From 91e28ce69c508f7148091cac3f6dfa82f507fb09 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 13:13:59 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 001/101] Cut Mission 4: redesign runbook and workpiece --- libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md | 240 +++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 169 deletions(-) diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md index 7f9e316eb9d..784b1ccc966 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md @@ -1,199 +1,101 @@ -# Mission 3 — structurally typed runbook to headless PN +# Mission 4 — owner-led runbook and workpiece redesign ## Status -Closed on 2026-08-31 with a split result. The real Flue runbook and elicitation-to-workpiece leg is accepted as the Mission 3 control. The real-model semantic construction leg is falsified on the exercised provider-visible schema route and moves forward only as successor risk; it is not retroactive success. +Live. This file is execution authority for [FE-1563](https://linear.app/hash/issue/FE-1563/redesign-the-elicitation-runbook-and-workpiece-against-the-frozen). Mission 3's frozen prospective campaign runs independently in its own worktree and remains the control; this branch must not alter that instrument or claim comparison results before its adjudication is available. -Close evidence: - -- [`docs/evidence/proofs/implementations/fe-1525-headless-runbook-pn.md`](docs/evidence/proofs/implementations/fe-1525-headless-runbook-pn.md) records the production runbook path, historical runs, hermetic construction, and paid construction failure. -- [`docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md`](docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md) records the frozen prospective control: three paid invocations, one invalid runtime member, two recoverable and independently graded workpieces, no hard-failure gates in the valid members, omniscient range `66.3–80.0 / 100`, and cold utility range `3.3–3.5 / 4` with conditional downstream readiness. - -Proof items 1–5 and 8 are established through the real production agent path. Item 7 is established for the elicitation workpiece as an explicitly partial, epistemically marked artifact. Item 6 is not established for real-model construction: the construct-only paid run made nine malformed nested `addType.elements` calls and produced a vacuously parser-valid empty net. The hermetic non-empty fixture proves packaging and callback validation, not model semantic fidelity. Construction-discovered return to elicitation also remains unexercised. - -Required design input: -[`docs/specs/structurally-typed-elicitation-runbooks.md`](docs/specs/structurally-typed-elicitation-runbooks.md). -The specification defines the meaning and first architecture of the runbook; this mission decides -what to build and prove. If the real path contradicts the design, stop and surface the evidence -rather than satisfying the document by construction. - -Later concerns are clustered in [`MISSION.next.md`](MISSION.next.md). That file is the canonical -draft of upcoming work, not a mission; do not implement it. Host-continuity work, Petrinaut -read/write tools, typed IR maps, observer-triggered sweeps, and any join to Mission 2's capture -store are not this mission. - -A now-retired side quest authorized one bounded Mission 3 remediation: a construct-only headless -conversation may mount the minimal Petrinaut mutation subset needed to replace free-form net JSON -with validated construction. Packaging and hermetic callback execution passed, but the single -real-model run failed to construct a non-empty net because the provider-facing open-object schema -lost the canonical array shape. The evidence is recorded in the implementation proof and carried -into Mission 5. Those tools stay absent from ordinary interview and `/api/chat` panel -conversations; live-net integration and the typed map remain Mission 5. +Later projection, provenance, bounded revision, observer, host-continuity, and optimisation concerns remain in [`MISSION.next.md`](MISSION.next.md). They are not implementation authority here. ## Imperative -Prove that one production Flue `ChatAgent` can use a **structurally typed elicitation runbook** to -conduct or replay an interview, maintain a structured-but-not-strictly-semantically-typed -**runbook IR**, and use that workpiece to generate Petri-net JSON that Petrinaut accepts. Bare IR -below means this Markdown workpiece, not the existing typed three-register IR. +Manually reshape the technically viable Mission 3 elicitation runbook and Markdown workpiece into a stronger, research-informed candidate that the owner understands and endorses one consequential decision at a time. -The runbook combines two authored knowledge layers: universal elicitation teaching (the useful -content behind the repertoire) and SDCPN target-formalism guidance (what to investigate, notice, -deepen, preserve, transform, and check). Deliver them through one Flue skill with progressively -disclosed resources, not through a large undifferentiated system prompt, a skill catalog, or the -old plugin runtime. +Use the completed research synthesis, historical workpieces, owner-supplied edge cases, and frozen prospective baseline as evidence rather than treating any one source as a specification. The mission should expose where the current package's teaching order, question dosage, epistemic treatment, phase boundaries, or workpiece structure strain under real modelling, make the least structural change that answers each observed strain, and establish the gains, regressions, and remaining uncertainty of the resulting candidate against the frozen control. -Condition 5's typed-capture path demanded too much in-loop semantic judgment and produced ordinary -question turns on the order of minutes. This mission recovers its researched teaching and authoring -discipline while testing structural typing as the sufficient first lever. It does not improve -capture quality and does not fold Mission 2's ledger. +This is not an autonomous rewrite and not a statistical claim of universal superiority. The design conversation and manual walkthroughs are part of the work: the owner expects remodeling itself to reveal consequential corner cases that an agent-generated replacement would miss. ## Throughline -One headless pass through the Mission 1 production door: +One stepwise redesign through the existing production package: -`createFlueClient → send initial modelling request → ChatAgent activates the runbook skill and reads elicitation + IR resources → (driver send → wait → history()) × interview turns → recover filled IR → driver sends construct-from-IR request → ChatAgent reads PN-construction + check resources and returns PN JSON → wait → history() → petrinaut-core parse/validate` +```text +research synthesis + historical workpieces + current authored resources +→ owner and agent inspect one observed strain or edge case +→ agree the local obligation and smallest structural or teaching change +→ manually revise the one-skill runbook/workpiece package +→ walk known and owner-supplied cases through that revision +→ repeat only at the new fog-line +→ freeze a versioned candidate instrument +→ run it through the production Flue ChatAgent +→ grade the recovered workpiece with the frozen ruler +→ compare candidate evidence with Mission 3's frozen control +``` -Skill activation and resource reads occur inside model turns initiated by `send`; the headless driver -does not invoke them before dispatch. The same agent owns elicitation, IR maintenance, -construction, and validation. These are lifecycle -phases, not separate agents. Construction may expose a gap and route the same agent back to -elicitation; the runbook describes the return without inventing a workflow engine. +The likely edit surface is the existing SDCPN-modelling skill: `SKILL.md`, `elicitation.md`, `ir-template.md`, and only the construction/check material whose phase ownership is directly implicated. Amend the structural-typing specification only when an accepted redesign decision contradicts it. Keep changes reviewable in small semantic steps rather than replacing the package wholesale. -During elicitation, work in the expert's vocabulary and maintain the IR. Read PN-construction -material only when constructing or checking the net. The IR is the seam: generation consumes it -rather than treating the transcript as the model. Manual loading into Petrinaut remains enough to -inspect the drawing. +The baseline campaign may complete while early design decisions proceed. Baseline results join before the candidate instrument is frozen or any improvement claim is made. Candidate runs use a new versioned protocol/output location and preserve their own instrument manifest; they never write into or modify the baseline campaign. ## Proof -This proof establishes that a structurally typed runbook package can teach one agent through the -real Flue path and yield a validatable Petri net. It does not establish a final heading catalogue, -a typed capture/IR system, canvas write tools, session-as-net, two brains, or an automated -repertoire-to-runbook compiler. - -From the real brunch-agent entrypoint (the same `ChatAgent` / `/api/chat` door as Missions 1–2), -one production-path test or documented headless script observes all of the following: - -1. The agent has one mounted runbook skill. Its concise catalog description and always-on - instruction route the modelling lifecycle without embedding the full runbook in the system - prompt. -2. Skill activation yields the shared lifecycle procedure. Flue's native skill-resource surface - makes elicitation teaching, the IR template, PN-construction guidance, and checks readable - without a bespoke loader. -3. The elicitation material visibly combines universal teaching and SDCPN target-formalism content - under the structural responsibilities fixed by the design specification. Authored runbook - content names situation typologies, not facts from the fixed operational scenario; those facts - appear only in conversation inputs, the filled IR, and evidence expectations. -4. Interviewing uses the expert's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, or colours; - construction guidance is not required to frame ordinary elicitation questions. -5. The conversation fills a recoverable Markdown IR whose structure, unknowns, assumptions, - conflicts, and omissions are legible without opening the Petrinaut GUI. -6. The construction phase consumes that IR, reads the construction/check material, and produces PN - JSON that `parseSDCPNFile` (or the current Petrinaut-core import equivalent) accepts. Missing - canvas positions are allowed if the parser already treats them as recoverable. -7. The result names consequential inference, approximation, defaulting, omission, and - unrepresentable material rather than silently hardening it. -8. The interviewer never calls a sweep tool and producing the IR/net does not write Mission 2's - capture store. - -Prefer that one throughline over a broad suite. Record the resource path taken and where the first -runbook helped, failed, or created attention strain. A fluent conversation by itself is not proof. +This proof establishes that the owner-led redesign produces a coherent candidate runbook/workpiece package with inspectable evidence of its effects. It does not establish projection, provenance, observer consolidation, scoped net revision, comprehensive domain semantics, or final demo readiness. + +Observe all of the following: + +1. Each consequential redesign has a recorded observed strain or edge case, the local obligation it answers, the alternatives considered where material, and owner acceptance before implementation. +2. The package remains one real Flue skill with progressive disclosure. Ordinary elicitation stays in operational vocabulary; IR headings, SDCPN structures, and construction schemas do not become an opening questionnaire. +3. The workpiece gives an authoritative, cold-readable home to the objective and process spine; expert evidence; agent inference; assumptions with reason and how-to-check; unknown, unasked, declined, deferred, and conflicting material where present; corrections or contextual coexistence; and construction-opened losses without laundering authorship. +4. Concrete walkthroughs exercise at least opening overload, policy versus practice, contextual quantities, scarce-resource reservation/release, hidden waiting, directional loss, correction versus contextual coexistence, and genuine unknown versus not-yet-asked. Owner-supplied cases may deepen this set. +5. One frozen candidate version runs through the production Flue `ChatAgent` and emits a recoverable workpiece. Its run artifacts record the exact candidate instrument and remain separate from the Mission 3 baseline. +6. Independent omniscient and cold review with the frozen ruler identifies gains, regressions, disagreements, and new mistakes relative to the control. A human adjudication states what the evidence supports without collapsing baseline variation to one mean score. +7. The resulting candidate is sufficient to prepare the prebuilt FE-1476 workpiece or explicitly names the smallest remaining workpiece gap. No projection success is inferred from workpiece quality. + +Prefer one coherent candidate and a discriminating comparison over many lightly reasoned variants. A fluent interview or attractive template by itself is not proof. ## Constraints -- Consume - [`docs/specs/structurally-typed-elicitation-runbooks.md`](docs/specs/structurally-typed-elicitation-runbooks.md): - broad runbook definition, structural-before-semantic typing, universal + target-formalism - authorship, one-agent lifecycle, one skill, and lazy phase-specific reference. -- Mission 1's chat door stays the door: Petrinaut panel → `transport-aisdk` → Flue `ChatAgent`. - Do not rewrite the panel onto `@flue/react`. The adapter still must not depend on core, binding, - or plugins. -- Use Flue's documented happy paths: `useSkill`, `activate_skill`, packaged supporting resources, - `read_skill_resource`, existing tool mounting, and the JS-API drive pattern. No custom prompt or - resource loader. -- Author the first rendered runbook directly in Markdown. Do not build a key renderer, compiler, - projection engine, or generic schema framework before a second real consumer creates strain. -- Keep the system instruction to identity, routing, lifecycle invariants, transport facts, and the - requirement to activate the runbook. Bulky teaching belongs in the skill package. -- One model-facing agent and one runbook skill. No skill catalog, subagent topology, workflow - engine, TUI, or second server. -- Keep elicitation and construction in separate information regions. Conversation follows the - expert's thread; IR headings do not become an opening questionnaire; PN internals remain - construction vocabulary. -- Author runbook resources at the target-formalism level. Concrete scenario facts belong only to - the run input and filled IR; do not bake a truck fleet, semiconductor fab, or any other test case - into reusable teaching. -- Structural typing may fix headings, nesting, repeated entry shapes, completion criteria, checks, - unknowns, and losses. Do not require closed kinds, slots, proposal types, precision grades, - firing predicates, fold rules, or typed completion algebra. -- Restore the useful drive pattern from condition 5 (`createFlueClient` over the app router), not - its SDCPN elicitor, `brunch_ask`, sweep, fold, or completion accounting. -- The IR template is a teaching workpiece, not ADR-0003 register 2 and not a projection of captures. - Do not call `applyCaptureSweep` or join Mission 2's store. -- No Petrinaut canvas mutation tools on ordinary interview or `/api/chat` panel conversations and - no typed FE map. The active side quest alone may mount its six-tool subset on a construct-only - headless conversation; generation still uses inference from structured prose. -- The app may import `@hashintel/petrinaut-core` to parse/validate PN JSON. It must not import - `@hashintel/petrinaut` UI. -- Update user-facing docs only where exercised behavior changes. +- Preserve the Mission 3 prospective baseline files, prompts, case, ruler, committed instrument, and artifacts unchanged. Candidate runs use a new versioned campaign. +- Treat the authoritative elicitation research synthesis as evidence and decision support, not a backlog to implement wholesale. Shared-source repetition is not independent corroboration. +- The owner leads semantic and editorial choices. The agent presents alternatives, traces consequences, edits accepted decisions, and runs probes; it does not infer approval or silently choose the final package. +- Work one observed strain or owner-supplied edge at a time. Prefer subtraction, relocation, and clearer authority before adding another catalog, abstraction, or artifact. +- Keep universal elicitation, SDCPN investigation, workpiece structure, and PN construction distinct enough that each can change without turning questions into schema slots. +- Preserve one model-facing agent, one runbook skill, Flue's native `useSkill` and resource disclosure, and the production `ChatAgent` door. Do not add a loader, workflow engine, second agent, or TUI. +- Do not add a comprehensive ontology, closed claim kinds, typed completion algebra, plugin/repertoire runtime, observer fold, projection engine, capture-store join, or live Petrinaut mutation path. +- Preserve exact expert evidence and honest authorship. Normalized prose, agent assumptions, unasked material, and explicit user unknowns remain distinguishable. +- Do not tune reusable guidance only to Vestera. Scenario facts and owner examples may test the package but do not enter reusable teaching as universal facts. +- Keep construction outside ordinary elicitation. Move construction-owned material only when the redesign can observe the effect; do not broaden into Mission 5's provider-schema problem. +- Update affected Petrinaut user-facing documentation only if this mission changes user-visible behavior in Petrinaut packages; internal runbook resource edits alone do not create that obligation. ## Fog-line -Do not design past these questions before running the smallest path that can answer them: - -- The first exact Markdown heading catalogue and which repeated entries need required child - headings rather than authoring convention alone. -- The smallest sufficient boundary between skill instructions and supporting resources. The - conceptual roles are fixed; exact files move only in response to observed sprawl, missed routing, - or phase contamination. -- The skill's name/description and the smallest always-on instruction that reliably cause - activation and resource routing over a long conversation. -- How the filled Markdown IR is recovered from the real conversation: one last-turn artifact, a - resource-like document returned in output, or another shape already supported by the path. Do - not create a persistence surface to answer this. -- How to exercise the lifecycle's construction-discovered-gap return without manufacturing a - workflow state machine. -- Whether `parseSDCPNFile` is sufficient “Petrinaut accepts,” or the path exposes a smaller/larger - import check. -- Which instructions initially believed universal prove SDCPN-specific, and which SDCPN guidance - earns migration upward. Record the editorial move; do not automate it. - -Resolve each at the real boundary and record the observed answer in code/tests and mission-close -evidence. A longer fog-line after the first run is calibration, not failure. +Do not design the whole candidate before resolving these questions with the owner at the affected resource: + +- Whether the first useful change is teaching order/dosage, workpiece structure, authorship/epistemic treatment, or a smaller combination. +- Whether broad headings survive, collapse into a case/process spine plus epistemic ledger, or become objective slices with supporting cases. Versioned assertion clusters are not the default. +- Whether question batching guidance belongs in always-on routing, the skill body, or elicitation resources, and whether the prospective control replicates historical opening overload. +- How much `Transform to PN` guidance should leave elicitation and whether projection losses should open only during construction. +- How to represent correction, contextual coexistence, declined/deferred material, and directional/context-dependent values without mandatory per-statement semantic typing. +- Which duplicate summaries can be removed only after one authoritative home is demonstrated. +- The smallest candidate campaign that can reveal regression given baseline variance without pretending one scenario proves universal superiority. +- Whether a manually discovered edge belongs in reusable guidance, a probe/grader catalog, the workpiece shape, or mission evidence only. + +Resolve each at the smallest real or paper boundary and record the decision before continuing. A longer fog-line after a walkthrough is calibration, not failure. ## Stop or reorient -Stop and surface evidence before continuing if: - -- the runbook is implemented from the old narrow `kickoff` / `trajectory` / `close` definition or - the broader design specification is treated as optional; -- the system prompt becomes the full research/runbook corpus instead of a concise router; -- more skills, another agent, a custom loader, or a workflow engine appear to solve an unobserved - future problem; -- construction material leaks into ordinary interviewing and produces schema-shaped or PN-shaped - questions; -- concrete scenario facts enter authored runbook resources instead of the conversation/IR instance; -- the agent cannot reliably activate the skill or read the relevant phase resource on the real - path; -- the IR cannot support PN generation without rereading the transcript as the primary model; -- a closed kind/slot/proposal/precision/firing/fold/completion system re-enters merely to make the - first template feel rigorous; -- producing the IR or PN requires writing Mission 2's capture store or implementing template fill - as apply-sweep; -- plugin-sdcpn, repertoire runtime, fold, completion, or `brunch_ask` re-enter as the teaching - vehicle; -- canvas mutation tools appear on the interviewer; -- the drive becomes a TUI or second server instead of `createFlueClient` against the live door; -- the adapter grows a dependency on core, binding, or plugins; -- ordinary teaching turns return to condition-5 latency (order-of-minutes) as the designed shape. - -A need for one semantic commitment is not permission to restore the whole typed kernel. Name the -specific missing commitment and reorient from that evidence. +Stop and surface the evidence if: + +- the redesign edits or overwrites the frozen baseline instrument, case, graders, ruler, or artifacts; +- the agent produces a wholesale replacement before the owner works through its consequential choices; +- headings or typologies become a scripted intake form or dictate the interview's opening order; +- uncertainty is handled by inventing more mandatory fields rather than preserving it honestly; +- normalized agent prose is presented as verbatim expert evidence or never-asked material becomes a user-declared unknown; +- concrete Vestera or owner-supplied facts leak into reusable teaching; +- construction, projection, provenance, observer scheduling, capture folding, or live net mutation expands into this mission because a later mission may need it; +- a candidate is called better from fluency, parser shape, aesthetics, or one favorable anecdote without the frozen comparison ruler and explicit regressions; +- the redesign requires restoring Condition 5's foreground `brunch_ask`, typed extraction/fold, completion accounting, or minute-scale ordinary turns. + +A need for one stronger structural distinction is not permission to rebuild the retired typed kernel. Name the exact ambiguity and test the least mechanism that could resolve it. ## Deferred -Mission 4 host continuity, Mission 5 typed map and Petrinaut read/write via existing `onToolCall`, -Mission 6 capture improvement, and whether capture and runbooks converge remain in -[`MISSION.next.md`](MISSION.next.md). Periodic PN generation and programmatic loading also remain -there. That draft does not supersede this mission. +Mission 5 owns the first workpiece-to-live-SDCPN projection and evidence-backed provenance answer. Mission 6 owns bounded reviewer re-elicitation and scoped net patching. Mission 7 owns the complete six-beat rehearsal and optimisation handoff. The inferential observer remains an optional spike rather than this mission's workpiece mechanism. Host/session continuity, compaction, voice, broad observability, simulated-conversation viewing, and remote release remain in `MISSION.next.md` unless this mission's real throughline exposes a direct blocker. From 7347f6f9edd759f04a78cc00909dd287767bf9eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 13:16:22 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 002/101] Advance upcoming missions after Mission 4 cut --- libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md | 87 +++----------------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-) diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md index 9a15cad8dba..6a11ebc9d7f 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md @@ -2,19 +2,14 @@ Self-contained canonical capture repository for upcoming missions: what we curre Plausible future missions are the ordered `# Mission N — …` headings. Imperative, Throughline, Proof, and Status wait until a cluster is cut into `MISSION.md`. Constraints, fog, and stop lines appear where prior discussion already earned them. Spikes, standing locks, out-of-scope decisions, and a live mission's leftovers get unnumbered headings — they are not fake missions. Update this file while planning context is active; it must carry full capture fidelity without relying on a transcript. When cutting or regrouping, compare this draft before and after: every item must either move into the live mission or remain here at the same fidelity. -Live Mission 3 is the runbook / Markdown workpiece / headless construction experiment. Archived Mission 2 is the mechanical capture pipe. The owner has accepted a split close posture: Mission 3's real Flue runbook and elicitation-to-workpiece leg worked technically, while its real-model construction leg failed at the provider-schema boundary. Mission 3 closes after the frozen prospective campaign supplies its three runs, independent grader reports, and human adjudication; those results establish the control rather than retroactively changing the mission's construction result. +Archived Mission 2 is the mechanical capture pipe. Mission 3 is closed with a split result: the real Flue runbook and elicitation-to-workpiece path is the accepted control, while real-model semantic construction failed at the provider-schema boundary. Its frozen prospective campaign contains one invalid runtime member and two valid independently graded members; the campaign adjudication is the comparison input, not permission to rewrite observed artifacts. -The prospective campaign and the next mission may proceed in parallel because the baseline instrument is frozen and clean. The redesign must not modify the control files or consume partial campaign output as if it were a completed baseline. Do not leave two live missions on one branch: Mission 3 remains authority in its current worktree; a concurrently launched successor needs its own issue, branch/worktree, and `MISSION.md`. - -The Mission 4–7 numbering below is **proposed successor numbering**. Live `MISSION.md` still deposits host continuity under the old Mission 4 label, typed map/read-write under Mission 5, and capture improvement under Mission 6. The proposed spine regroups those concerns around owner-led runbook redesign and FE-1476; until missions are cut, the old labels remain aliases rather than a second execution plan. +Live Mission 4 is the owner-led runbook/workpiece redesign in [`MISSION.md`](MISSION.md), tracked by FE-1563. Do not implement another numbered cluster on this branch. The detailed Mission 5–7 clusters below are provisional based on current evidence; Mission 4's manual redesign may alter their workpiece assumptions and join contracts before they are cut. ```text -M1 chat (done) M2 mechanical capture (archived) M3 runbook/workpiece (closing) - ├─ frozen prospective control - └─ independent grading + adjudication - -Parallel successor -M4 owner-led, research-informed runbook/workpiece redesign → versioned variant evidence +M1 chat (done) M2 mechanical capture (archived) M3 runbook/workpiece (closed) + └─ frozen prospective control +M4 owner-led, research-informed runbook/workpiece redesign (live) ↓ informs the prepared artifact and seam FE-1476 delivery spine ├─ M5 traceable prebuilt workpiece → live SDCPN → provenance answer beats 1–3 @@ -213,66 +208,6 @@ Useful measurements remain support coverage, synthesis fan-in, capture utility, The former recommendation was production independence plus offline shadow mapping. FE-1476 supersedes independence only as a sufficient **delivery posture**, because visible provenance and revision are now owner-required. It does not prove a capture-store fold, one-artifact merger, live in-loop support linker, or comprehensive statement-identity system. The observer and derivation-record tracks are the smallest new probes against that changed obligation. -# Mission 4 — owner-led runbook and workpiece redesign - -Mission 3 proved that the runbook approach technically works, not that its authored guidance or Markdown workpiece is optimal. The next mission is a design-and-evidence mission led step by step with the owner: use the completed research synthesis, historical artifacts, and frozen prospective control to manually reshape how the runbook elicits, organizes, qualifies, and presents operational knowledge. The owner expects the act of remodeling to expose edge cases and modelling assumptions that an autonomous rewrite would miss. - -This mission may start while Mission 3's baseline campaign runs because it begins from already-frozen inputs and does not mutate the control. Comparison claims wait for the completed baseline and adjudication. The mission should record each consequential redesign choice before implementing it, inspect the affected resource in context, make the smallest coherent edit, and walk concrete and adversarial examples through the changed shape before moving on. It is not a one-shot agent-generated replacement. - -The candidate throughline is: - -```text -research synthesis + historical workpieces + current authored resources -→ owner/agent inspect one observed strain or edge case -→ agree the local obligation and smallest structural or teaching change -→ manually revise the runbook/workpiece package -→ walk known and owner-supplied cases through the revision -→ freeze a versioned candidate instrument -→ run a prospective candidate campaign -→ compare against the frozen Mission 3 control with the same ruler -``` - -The likely edit surface is the existing one-skill package—`SKILL.md`, `elicitation.md`, `ir-template.md`, and only the construction/check material whose phase ownership is directly implicated. The current structural-typing specification may also need revision if an observed design decision contradicts it. The mission does not presume assertion cards, an observer, a graph, or a new runtime. - -Candidate evidence obligations: - -- The owner can review and explain each consequential change and the edge case or observed strain it answers. -- The revised package remains one real Flue skill with progressive disclosure and keeps ordinary elicitation in operational rather than PN/schema vocabulary. -- The workpiece gives one authoritative home to evidence, agent inference, assumptions with reason/how-to-check, unresolved or declined material, conflicts/corrections, and construction-opened losses without turning headings into an opening questionnaire. -- Concrete and adversarial walkthroughs cover at least opening overload, policy versus practice, contextual quantities, scarce-resource reservation/release, hidden waiting, directional loss, correction versus contextual coexistence, and genuine unknown versus not-yet-asked. -- A versioned prospective candidate run produces a recoverable inspectable workpiece through the production Flue door. The frozen ruler and independent cold/omniscient review identify gains, regressions, and remaining uncertainty relative to Mission 3's baseline. -- The result is suitable for preparing FE-1476's prebuilt artifact, but projection success is not fabricated as a redesign result. - -## Constraints already earned - -- Keep the prospective baseline files, prompts, case, ruler, and committed instrument immutable. Candidate runs write to a new versioned campaign and record their own manifest. -- Treat research as evidence and prompts for judgment, not a specification to implement wholesale. Shared-source repetition is not independent corroboration. -- The owner leads semantic and editorial decisions. The agent may present alternatives, trace consequences, edit accepted choices, and run probes; it must not silently decide the final runbook shape. -- Prefer subtraction, relocation, and clearer authority before adding more catalogs. Existing duplication and vague guidance are part of the observed strain. -- Keep universal elicitation, SDCPN investigation, workpiece structure, and PN construction distinct enough that one can change without turning every question into a schema slot. -- Do not add a comprehensive ontology, closed claim kinds, typed completion algebra, plugin runtime, observer fold, projection engine, or capture-store join to make the redesign feel rigorous. -- Preserve exact expert evidence and honest authorship. A normalized summary, agent assumption, unasked item, and explicit user unknown must not collapse into one label. -- Do not tune only to Vestera. Owner-supplied counterexamples may be used as walkthroughs, but reusable guidance must remain scenario-neutral. - -## Fog-line - -- Whether the best first change is primarily teaching order/dosage, workpiece structure, authorship/epistemic treatment, or a smaller combination. Decide one strain at a time rather than replacing the package wholesale. -- Whether the current broad headings survive, collapse into a case/process spine plus ledger, or become objective slices with supporting cases. Versioned assertion clusters remain a later possibility, not the redesign default. -- Whether batching guidance belongs in always-on routing, the skill body, or elicitation resources. The baseline must first show whether historical opening overload replicates. -- How much construction language should move out of elicitation and whether `Projection losses` should be opened only during construction. -- How to represent correction, contextual coexistence, declined/deferred material, and directional/context-dependent values without requiring per-statement semantic typing. -- The smallest candidate campaign that can reveal regression without pretending one scenario establishes universal superiority. Pin this after the redesigned instrument and baseline variance are visible. -- Which manually discovered edges belong in reusable guidance, a grader/probe catalog, the workpiece shape, or only mission evidence. - -## Stop or reorient - -- Stop if the redesign begins editing the frozen baseline instrument or grading prompts. -- Stop if the agent produces a wholesale replacement before the owner has worked through the consequential choices. -- Stop if headings or typologies become a scripted intake form or dictate the interview's opening order. -- Stop if uncertainty is handled by inventing more mandatory fields rather than preserving it honestly. -- Stop if construction, provenance, observer scheduling, or live net mutation expands into this mission merely because later missions need them. -- Stop if a candidate is called better from fluency, parser shape, or one favorable anecdote without the frozen comparison ruler and explicit regressions. - # Mission 5 — traceable projection through the real panel The first unproven boundary is not a complete requirements graph. It is one evidence-backed workpiece item becoming one semantically meaningful live-net region whose provenance a reviewer can inspect through the production panel. @@ -393,7 +328,7 @@ These tracks can begin before the numbered mission that may consume them. Produc | Track | Can start from | Produces | Join gate | Does not block | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | -| Frozen prospective baseline | Current committed runner and instrument | Three runs, independent grader reports, human adjudication | Mission 4 may begin manual decisions in parallel; reconcile before freezing or claiming improvement of the candidate instrument | Mission 5's projection tracer | +| Frozen prospective baseline | Completed Mission 3 control: one invalid runtime member and two valid graded members | Immutable artifacts plus campaign adjudication | Mission 4 consumes the observed range before freezing or claiming improvement of its candidate instrument | Mission 5's projection tracer | | Inferential observer fold | Fixed historical transcript and expected source excerpts | Evidence-backed consolidated revisions plus latency/failure observations | Decision report before Mission 6: admit observer-derived state only if evidence preservation, ordering, latency, and flush behavior pass; otherwise select foreground phase-boundary synthesis or reorient | Missions 4–5; Mission 6 is informed by this spike but does not require it to succeed | | Provider-visible schema path | Existing failed paid run, canonical Petrinaut Zod schemas, live client-tool route | One real-model canonical nested tool call or a crisp upstream blocker | A successful canonical call admits Mission 5 construction; a crisp upstream blocker triggers Mission 5 stop/reorientation and does not count as satisfying the join | Baseline and Mission 4 redesign | | Provenance interaction fixture | Fixed workpiece item and a tiny versioned derivation-record fixture | Reviewer-visible “why?” interaction | Freeze the smallest fixture contract before Mission 5 projection and UI branches diverge; both must consume that exact version | Provider/model construction while fixtures are used honestly | @@ -545,20 +480,20 @@ This can run as a parallel feasibility track. Promote it into FE-1476 acceptance Undecided. It is the converse of the current door—resume a harness session by chat id. Flue already owns that session; `transport-aisdk` is the UI adapter. A Pi / Claude Code harness would be another substrate, which `binding-flue` isolates, or a Flue replacement. It is not the watch-sims surface and not part of FE-1476 without new evidence. -# Live-mission leftovers and close inputs +# Mission 3 close record and carried inputs -Live Mission 3 locked one off-canvas PN JSON result, Petrinaut validation, manual load as sufficient inspection, and no canvas tools. Its completed evidence and residual failures must be recorded before the next mission is cut. +Mission 3 locked one off-canvas PN JSON result, Petrinaut validation, manual load as sufficient inspection, and no canvas tools. It closed with the runbook/workpiece path accepted and real-model semantic construction false on the exercised route. - The runbook skill packages and discloses universal elicitation, the Markdown workpiece, PN construction, and checks through the production Flue agent. -- Two historical real runs produced useful workpieces but are calibration only. The frozen prospective three-run campaign is ready and remains a parallel evidence track. -- Opening overload of 4–10 numbered questions appeared in both historical runs. The system/resource placement question remains unresolved; do not edit teaching before the frozen baseline if doing so would invalidate that baseline. +- Two historical real runs remain calibration only. The frozen prospective campaign contains one invalid runtime member and two valid independently graded workpieces; its authoritative range and dispositions are in `docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md`. +- Opening overload of 4–10 numbered questions appeared in both historical runs but did not recur in either valid prospective member. The system/resource placement question remains unresolved; do not turn either observation into a universal rule. - One-shot construction ran 162–271 seconds, a distinct budget from healthy 5–23 second teaching turns. - The validated construction side quest proved packaging, canonical callback validation, and a hermetic non-empty net. Its construct-only agent mounted exactly `getLatestNetDefinition`, `addType`, `addParameter`, `addPlace`, `addTransition`, and `addArc` through immutable Flue `initialData`; those tools remained absent from ordinary panel conversations. The one paid real-model run failed because provider-visible schemas erased nested shape: nine `addType.elements` calls encoded the array as a string. Parser acceptance of the resulting empty document was vacuous. - Construction-discovered-gap return was unexercised. The agent delivered `partial-with-named-gaps` rather than asking the smallest next question. - Periodic PN generation, programmatic loading, and a validated live patch remain successor concerns; they are not retroactive Mission 3 success. - The six `Transform to PN` children still reside under elicitation despite construction owning that knowledge. Move them only in a teaching variant or mission that can observe the effect. -The close decision should distinguish “runbook/workpiece path accepted” from “real-model semantic construction false.” Do not rewrite Mission 3 as if all original proof items passed; equally, do not keep it live merely because its falsified construction route has now become Mission 5's first boundary. +The close decision is “runbook/workpiece path accepted; real-model semantic construction false.” Do not rewrite Mission 3 as if all original proof items passed. Its falsified construction route is now Mission 5's first boundary. # Standing decisions From 3a87a607e62f05ab2a33a9a573ab2bfaae5f70cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 13:16:40 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 003/101] Keep closed Mission 3 outside future numbering --- libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md index 6a11ebc9d7f..121680255c8 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md @@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ This can run as a parallel feasibility track. Promote it into FE-1476 acceptance Undecided. It is the converse of the current door—resume a harness session by chat id. Flue already owns that session; `transport-aisdk` is the UI adapter. A Pi / Claude Code harness would be another substrate, which `binding-flue` isolates, or a Flue replacement. It is not the watch-sims surface and not part of FE-1476 without new evidence. -# Mission 3 close record and carried inputs +# Closed runbook/workpiece mission record and carried inputs Mission 3 locked one off-canvas PN JSON result, Petrinaut validation, manual load as sufficient inspection, and no canvas tools. It closed with the runbook/workpiece path accepted and real-model semantic construction false on the exercised route. From 41a1214068a76b6d7af31c7e0672e056e2b7caaa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 13:18:47 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 004/101] Bind Mission 4 to the completed baseline --- libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md index 784b1ccc966..702fcd251a9 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ ## Status -Live. This file is execution authority for [FE-1563](https://linear.app/hash/issue/FE-1563/redesign-the-elicitation-runbook-and-workpiece-against-the-frozen). Mission 3's frozen prospective campaign runs independently in its own worktree and remains the control; this branch must not alter that instrument or claim comparison results before its adjudication is available. +Live. This file is execution authority for [FE-1563](https://linear.app/hash/issue/FE-1563/redesign-the-elicitation-runbook-and-workpiece-against-the-frozen). Mission 3's frozen prospective campaign is the immutable control: one invalid runtime member, two valid independently graded workpieces, and an adjudicated range recorded in [`docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md`](docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md). This branch must not alter that instrument or its observed artifacts. Later projection, provenance, bounded revision, observer, host-continuity, and optimisation concerns remain in [`MISSION.next.md`](MISSION.next.md). They are not implementation authority here. @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ research synthesis + historical workpieces + current authored resources The likely edit surface is the existing SDCPN-modelling skill: `SKILL.md`, `elicitation.md`, `ir-template.md`, and only the construction/check material whose phase ownership is directly implicated. Amend the structural-typing specification only when an accepted redesign decision contradicts it. Keep changes reviewable in small semantic steps rather than replacing the package wholesale. -The baseline campaign may complete while early design decisions proceed. Baseline results join before the candidate instrument is frozen or any improvement claim is made. Candidate runs use a new versioned protocol/output location and preserve their own instrument manifest; they never write into or modify the baseline campaign. +The baseline is available as a comparison input, not a design prescription. Its observed range and dispositions must be considered before the candidate instrument is frozen or any improvement claim is made. Candidate runs use a new versioned protocol/output location and preserve their own instrument manifest; they never write into or modify the baseline campaign. ## Proof From 237a311de2504abd27aa052682b9252b51fbfc6a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 14:12:31 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 005/101] Colocate the chat agent with its Flue resources --- .../agents/{chat-agent.ts => chat-agent/agent.ts} | 8 ++++---- .../chat-agent}/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md | 0 .../chat-agent}/skills/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md | 0 .../skills/sdcpn-modelling/elicitation.md | 0 .../skills/sdcpn-modelling/ir-template.md | 0 .../skills/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md | 0 .../chat-agent}/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts | 2 +- .../src/{ => agents/chat-agent}/tools/ping.ts | 0 .../chat-agent}/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts | 2 +- apps/brunch-agent/src/app.ts | 2 +- apps/brunch-agent/src/channels/.gitkeep | 0 apps/brunch-agent/src/headless-petrinaut-client.ts | 2 +- apps/brunch-agent/src/petrinaut-chat.ts | 2 +- apps/brunch-agent/src/runbook-elicitation-run.ts | 12 ++++++------ apps/brunch-agent/src/runbook-headless-run.ts | 2 +- apps/brunch-agent/src/skills/.gitkeep | 0 apps/brunch-agent/src/subagents/.gitkeep | 0 apps/brunch-agent/test/build-artifact.test.ts | 5 ++++- apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts | 4 ++-- .../test/petrinaut-construction-tools.test.ts | 2 +- apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation.test.ts | 2 +- .../test/runbook-headless.integration.ts | 2 +- apps/brunch-agent/test/sdcpn-modelling-skill.test.ts | 2 +- 23 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) rename apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/{chat-agent.ts => chat-agent/agent.ts} (91%) rename apps/brunch-agent/src/{ => agents/chat-agent}/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md (100%) rename apps/brunch-agent/src/{ => agents/chat-agent}/skills/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md (100%) rename apps/brunch-agent/src/{ => agents/chat-agent}/skills/sdcpn-modelling/elicitation.md (100%) rename apps/brunch-agent/src/{ => agents/chat-agent}/skills/sdcpn-modelling/ir-template.md (100%) rename apps/brunch-agent/src/{ => agents/chat-agent}/skills/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md (100%) rename apps/brunch-agent/src/{ => agents/chat-agent}/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts (97%) rename apps/brunch-agent/src/{ => agents/chat-agent}/tools/ping.ts (100%) rename apps/brunch-agent/src/{ => agents/chat-agent}/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts (92%) delete mode 100644 apps/brunch-agent/src/channels/.gitkeep delete mode 100644 apps/brunch-agent/src/skills/.gitkeep delete mode 100644 apps/brunch-agent/src/subagents/.gitkeep diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts similarity index 91% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent.ts rename to apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts index 36238b44164..99943f65e31 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts @@ -9,13 +9,13 @@ import { useInitialData, useModel, useSkill, useTool } from "@flue/runtime"; import * as v from "valibot"; -import sdcpnModellingSkill from "../skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md"; +import sdcpnModellingSkill from "./skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md"; import { petrinautConstructionTools, VALIDATED_CONSTRUCTION_MODE, -} from "../tools/petrinaut-construction.ts"; -import { ping } from "../tools/ping.ts"; -import { readPetrinautDoc } from "../tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts"; +} from "./tools/petrinaut-construction.ts"; +import { ping } from "./tools/ping.ts"; +import { readPetrinautDoc } from "./tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts"; export const CHAT_MODEL_ID = process.env["BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL"] || "claude-haiku-4-5"; diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md b/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md similarity index 100% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md rename to apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md b/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md similarity index 100% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md rename to apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/elicitation.md b/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/elicitation.md similarity index 100% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/elicitation.md rename to apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/elicitation.md diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/ir-template.md b/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/ir-template.md similarity index 100% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/ir-template.md rename to apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/ir-template.md diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md b/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md similarity index 100% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md rename to apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts similarity index 97% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts rename to apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts index 87a6931bbda..bf04d6bc656 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ import * as v from "valibot"; import { petrinautAiTools } from "@hashintel/petrinaut-core/ai"; -import { AWAITING_CLIENT } from "../client-tool.ts"; +import { AWAITING_CLIENT } from "../../../client-tool.ts"; export const VALIDATED_CONSTRUCTION_MODE = "validated-construction"; diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/tools/ping.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/ping.ts similarity index 100% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/tools/ping.ts rename to apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/ping.ts diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts similarity index 92% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts rename to apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts index 7b5bf99f7f4..67893049d92 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ import { readPetrinautDocToolName, } from "@hashintel/petrinaut-core/ai"; -import { AWAITING_CLIENT } from "../client-tool.ts"; +import { AWAITING_CLIENT } from "../../../client-tool.ts"; export const READ_PETRINAUT_DOC_TOOL_NAME = readPetrinautDocToolName; diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/app.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/app.ts index 71917611093..a22f5b68384 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/app.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/app.ts @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ import { createAgentRouter } from "@flue/runtime/routing"; import { Hono } from "hono"; import { agentOwnershipGuard } from "./agent-ownership.ts"; -import { ChatAgent } from "./agents/chat-agent.ts"; +import { ChatAgent } from "./agents/chat-agent/agent.ts"; import { assetHandler } from "./assets.ts"; import { petrinautChatHandler } from "./petrinaut-chat.ts"; import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE, PETRINAUT_CHAT_ROUTE } from "./routes.ts"; diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/channels/.gitkeep b/apps/brunch-agent/src/channels/.gitkeep deleted file mode 100644 index e69de29bb2d..00000000000 diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/headless-petrinaut-client.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/headless-petrinaut-client.ts index 6bcb0ab6d55..30c4254229c 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/headless-petrinaut-client.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/headless-petrinaut-client.ts @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ import { import { PETRINAUT_CONSTRUCTION_TOOL_NAMES, type PetrinautConstructionToolName, -} from "./tools/petrinaut-construction.ts"; +} from "./agents/chat-agent/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts"; import type { Petrinaut } from "@hashintel/petrinaut-core"; diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/petrinaut-chat.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/petrinaut-chat.ts index 6ea6b1865d4..e729f71dcd7 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/petrinaut-chat.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/petrinaut-chat.ts @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ import { type TransportInspectionEvent, } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent-transport-aisdk"; -import { ChatAgent } from "./agents/chat-agent.ts"; +import { ChatAgent } from "./agents/chat-agent/agent.ts"; import { clientToolNames, CLIENT_TOOL_RESULT_SIGNAL } from "./client-tool.ts"; import { agentOwnershipHeaders, diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/runbook-elicitation-run.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/runbook-elicitation-run.ts index 34aed31a349..0bcee16b4ec 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/runbook-elicitation-run.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/runbook-elicitation-run.ts @@ -92,14 +92,14 @@ if (outputDirectory === defaultOutputDirectory && !usesFrozenV1Configuration) { const instrumentFiles = [ "apps/brunch-agent/package.json", - "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent.ts", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", "apps/brunch-agent/src/runbook-artifacts.ts", "apps/brunch-agent/src/runbook-elicitation-run.ts", - "apps/brunch-agent/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md", - "apps/brunch-agent/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/elicitation.md", - "apps/brunch-agent/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/ir-template.md", - "apps/brunch-agent/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md", - "apps/brunch-agent/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/elicitation.md", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/ir-template.md", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/opening-message.md", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/situation-pack.md", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/vestera-scheduling/truth-ledger-v1-prospective.yaml", diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/runbook-headless-run.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/runbook-headless-run.ts index 233a4571539..b4601606a44 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/runbook-headless-run.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/runbook-headless-run.ts @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url"; import { observe } from "@flue/runtime"; import { createFlueClient } from "@flue/sdk"; +import { VALIDATED_CONSTRUCTION_MODE } from "./agents/chat-agent/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts"; import { CLIENT_TOOL_RESULT_SIGNAL, isAwaitingClient } from "./client-tool.ts"; import { agentOwnershipHeaders, @@ -33,7 +34,6 @@ import { interviewerToolNamesFrom, skillResourcePathsFrom, } from "./runbook-artifacts.ts"; -import { VALIDATED_CONSTRUCTION_MODE } from "./tools/petrinaut-construction.ts"; import type { FlueConversationPart, FlueConversationSnapshot } from "@flue/sdk"; diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/skills/.gitkeep b/apps/brunch-agent/src/skills/.gitkeep deleted file mode 100644 index e69de29bb2d..00000000000 diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/subagents/.gitkeep b/apps/brunch-agent/src/subagents/.gitkeep deleted file mode 100644 index e69de29bb2d..00000000000 diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/build-artifact.test.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/build-artifact.test.ts index 14a8775ba43..fb12b6bb0cd 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/build-artifact.test.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/build-artifact.test.ts @@ -41,7 +41,10 @@ beforeAll(() => { /** The pinned identity of every agent module in the app, read from source. */ function declaredAgentIdentities(): string[] { const agentsDirectory = join(DEV_APP, "src/agents"); - return readdirSync(agentsDirectory) + return readdirSync(agentsDirectory, { + recursive: true, + encoding: "utf8", + }) .filter((entry) => entry.endsWith(".ts")) .flatMap((entry) => Array.from( diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts index 20f70775a09..18740e9ce54 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ import { import { setProvider } from "@flue/runtime"; import { createFlueClient, FlueApiError } from "@flue/sdk"; +import { PING_TOOL_NAME } from "../src/agents/chat-agent/tools/ping.ts"; +import { READ_PETRINAUT_DOC_TOOL_NAME } from "../src/agents/chat-agent/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts"; import { applyCaptureSweep } from "../src/capture-sweep.ts"; import { CLIENT_TOOL_RESULT_SIGNAL } from "../src/client-tool.ts"; import { @@ -22,8 +24,6 @@ import { import { formatFlueTranscript } from "../src/flue-transcript.ts"; import { loadBuiltBrunchApplication } from "../src/load-built-application.ts"; import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE } from "../src/routes.ts"; -import { PING_TOOL_NAME } from "../src/tools/ping.ts"; -import { READ_PETRINAUT_DOC_TOOL_NAME } from "../src/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts"; import type { PetrinautChatResult, diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-construction-tools.test.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-construction-tools.test.ts index 1ca9cb0e53a..b577637a4ca 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-construction-tools.test.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-construction-tools.test.ts @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ import { petrinautAiTools } from "@hashintel/petrinaut-core/ai"; import { PETRINAUT_CONSTRUCTION_TOOL_NAMES, petrinautConstructionTools, -} from "../src/tools/petrinaut-construction"; +} from "../src/agents/chat-agent/tools/petrinaut-construction"; const toolByName = (toolName: string) => { const constructionTool = petrinautConstructionTools.find( diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation.test.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation.test.ts index 44aca868307..76fc6544232 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation.test.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation.test.ts @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ test("the prospective runner records a recoverable IR without construction or ca "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/opening-message.md", ); expect(record.instrument.fileSha256).toHaveProperty( - "apps/brunch-agent/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md", ); expect(record.finalizationMessage).toContain("not expert evidence"); } finally { diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-headless.integration.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-headless.integration.ts index dbef41dd0c9..f7b9c76a500 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-headless.integration.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-headless.integration.ts @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ import { import { setProvider } from "@flue/runtime"; import { createFlueClient } from "@flue/sdk"; +import { VALIDATED_CONSTRUCTION_MODE } from "../src/agents/chat-agent/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts"; import { CLIENT_TOOL_RESULT_SIGNAL, isAwaitingClient, @@ -30,7 +31,6 @@ import { interviewerToolNamesFrom, skillResourcePathsFrom, } from "../src/runbook-artifacts.ts"; -import { VALIDATED_CONSTRUCTION_MODE } from "../src/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts"; const CHAT_MODEL_ID = "claude-haiku-4-5"; const RUNBOOK_SKILL_NAME = "sdcpn-modelling"; diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/sdcpn-modelling-skill.test.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/sdcpn-modelling-skill.test.ts index 224a52c4eaf..b2575c3de5c 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/sdcpn-modelling-skill.test.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/sdcpn-modelling-skill.test.ts @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ import { readFileSync } from "node:fs"; import { describe, expect, test } from "vitest"; const skillDirectory = new URL( - "../src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/", + "../src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/", import.meta.url, ); const resourceFiles = [ From 93d81db88ab71857a8e871f4bea48f9b5cdcee36 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 14:16:10 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 006/101] Group Brunch shell code by authority --- .../brunch-agent/petrinaut-local.vite.config.ts | 2 +- .../chat-agent/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts | 2 +- .../chat-agent/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts | 2 +- apps/brunch-agent/src/app.ts | 8 ++++---- .../apply-sweep.ts} | 8 ++++---- .../client-tools.ts} | 0 .../identity-web.ts} | 2 +- .../identity.ts} | 4 ++-- .../payload.ts} | 0 .../transcript.ts} | 2 +- .../ui-stream.ts} | 2 +- apps/brunch-agent/src/{ => http}/assets.ts | 0 .../local-origins.ts} | 0 .../{agent-ownership.ts => http/ownership.ts} | 4 ++-- .../src/{ => http}/petrinaut-chat.ts | 17 ++++++++++------- apps/brunch-agent/src/{ => http}/routes.ts | 0 .../brunch-agent/src/runbook-elicitation-run.ts | 6 +++--- apps/brunch-agent/src/runbook-headless-run.ts | 15 +++++++++------ apps/brunch-agent/src/transcript-cli.ts | 8 ++++---- apps/brunch-agent/src/ui/chat.tsx | 6 +++--- apps/brunch-agent/test/agent-ownership.test.ts | 8 ++++---- apps/brunch-agent/test/assets.test.ts | 2 +- .../test/conversation-identity.test.ts | 4 ++-- apps/brunch-agent/test/flue-transcript.test.ts | 2 +- apps/brunch-agent/test/flue-ui-stream.test.ts | 2 +- .../brunch-agent/test/local-dev-origins.test.ts | 6 ++++-- .../test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts | 10 +++++----- .../test/runbook-headless.integration.ts | 6 +++--- apps/brunch-agent/vite.config.ts | 2 +- 29 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-) rename apps/brunch-agent/src/{capture-sweep.ts => capture/apply-sweep.ts} (94%) rename apps/brunch-agent/src/{client-tool.ts => conversation/client-tools.ts} (100%) rename apps/brunch-agent/src/{conversation-identity-web.ts => conversation/identity-web.ts} (86%) rename apps/brunch-agent/src/{conversation-identity.ts => conversation/identity.ts} (95%) rename apps/brunch-agent/src/{conversation-payload.ts => conversation/payload.ts} (100%) rename apps/brunch-agent/src/{flue-transcript.ts => conversation/transcript.ts} (99%) rename apps/brunch-agent/src/{flue-ui-stream.ts => conversation/ui-stream.ts} (99%) rename apps/brunch-agent/src/{ => http}/assets.ts (100%) rename apps/brunch-agent/src/{local-dev-origins.ts => http/local-origins.ts} (100%) rename apps/brunch-agent/src/{agent-ownership.ts => http/ownership.ts} (88%) rename apps/brunch-agent/src/{ => http}/petrinaut-chat.ts (87%) rename apps/brunch-agent/src/{ => http}/routes.ts (100%) diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/petrinaut-local.vite.config.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/petrinaut-local.vite.config.ts index 58b2973bda7..b265537076c 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/petrinaut-local.vite.config.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/petrinaut-local.vite.config.ts @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ import { import { defaultChatOrigin, petrinautLocalServer, -} from "./src/local-dev-origins.ts"; +} from "./src/http/local-origins.ts"; const withoutIncumbentChatHandler = ( plugins: readonly PluginOption[], diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts index bf04d6bc656..c04177c94e1 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ import * as v from "valibot"; import { petrinautAiTools } from "@hashintel/petrinaut-core/ai"; -import { AWAITING_CLIENT } from "../../../client-tool.ts"; +import { AWAITING_CLIENT } from "../../../conversation/client-tools.ts"; export const VALIDATED_CONSTRUCTION_MODE = "validated-construction"; diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts index 67893049d92..28e014c0cec 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ import { readPetrinautDocToolName, } from "@hashintel/petrinaut-core/ai"; -import { AWAITING_CLIENT } from "../../../client-tool.ts"; +import { AWAITING_CLIENT } from "../../../conversation/client-tools.ts"; export const READ_PETRINAUT_DOC_TOOL_NAME = readPetrinautDocToolName; diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/app.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/app.ts index a22f5b68384..b9e0f6742ef 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/app.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/app.ts @@ -14,11 +14,11 @@ import { instrument } from "@flue/runtime"; import { createAgentRouter } from "@flue/runtime/routing"; import { Hono } from "hono"; -import { agentOwnershipGuard } from "./agent-ownership.ts"; import { ChatAgent } from "./agents/chat-agent/agent.ts"; -import { assetHandler } from "./assets.ts"; -import { petrinautChatHandler } from "./petrinaut-chat.ts"; -import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE, PETRINAUT_CHAT_ROUTE } from "./routes.ts"; +import { assetHandler } from "./http/assets.ts"; +import { agentOwnershipGuard } from "./http/ownership.ts"; +import { petrinautChatHandler } from "./http/petrinaut-chat.ts"; +import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE, PETRINAUT_CHAT_ROUTE } from "./http/routes.ts"; instrument(createOpenTelemetryInstrumentation({ content: false })); diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/capture-sweep.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/capture/apply-sweep.ts similarity index 94% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/capture-sweep.ts rename to apps/brunch-agent/src/capture/apply-sweep.ts index 738bb236073..6101b3867de 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/capture-sweep.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/capture/apply-sweep.ts @@ -15,9 +15,9 @@ import { agentOwnershipHeaders, flueConversationIdFrom, type ConversationIdentity, -} from "./conversation-identity.ts"; -import { captureStorePath } from "./db-path.ts"; -import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE } from "./routes.ts"; +} from "../conversation/identity.ts"; +import { captureStorePath } from "../db-path.ts"; +import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE } from "../http/routes.ts"; export interface CaptureSweepCapture { readonly id: string; @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ const conversationUrl = (instanceId: string): string => `http://brunch.local/agents/${CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE}/${instanceId}`; const sourceAppTransport: typeof fetch = async (input, init) => { - const { default: app } = await import("./app.ts"); + const { default: app } = await import("../app.ts"); return app.fetch(input instanceof Request ? input : new Request(input, init)); }; diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/client-tool.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/client-tools.ts similarity index 100% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/client-tool.ts rename to apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/client-tools.ts diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation-identity-web.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/identity-web.ts similarity index 86% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation-identity-web.ts rename to apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/identity-web.ts index 8faf2eb2d84..68d7da8536d 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation-identity-web.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/identity-web.ts @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ /** Browser-safe instance-id hash; must match `flueConversationId` byte-for-byte. */ -import { hexFromDigest, identityPayload } from "./conversation-payload.ts"; +import { hexFromDigest, identityPayload } from "./payload.ts"; export const flueConversationIdWeb = async ( principalKey: string, diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation-identity.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/identity.ts similarity index 95% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation-identity.ts rename to apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/identity.ts index 4fb33d29a9b..ffaa4738819 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation-identity.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/identity.ts @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ import { BRUNCH_CONVERSATION_HEADER, BRUNCH_PRINCIPAL_HEADER, identityPayload, -} from "./conversation-payload.ts"; +} from "./payload.ts"; import type { ConversationIdentity } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent-transport-aisdk"; @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ export { BRUNCH_CONVERSATION_HEADER, BRUNCH_PRINCIPAL_HEADER, LOCAL_UI_PRINCIPAL, -} from "./conversation-payload.ts"; +} from "./payload.ts"; export type { ConversationIdentity }; export const flueConversationId = ( diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation-payload.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/payload.ts similarity index 100% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation-payload.ts rename to apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/payload.ts diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/flue-transcript.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/transcript.ts similarity index 99% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/flue-transcript.ts rename to apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/transcript.ts index a8072f9cf31..cbaf34b0c33 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/flue-transcript.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/transcript.ts @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ import { CLIENT_TOOL_RESULT_SIGNAL, isAwaitingClient, providerExecutedFor, -} from "./client-tool.ts"; +} from "./client-tools.ts"; type UiMessagePart = | { readonly type: "text"; readonly text: string; readonly state: "done" } diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/flue-ui-stream.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/ui-stream.ts similarity index 99% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/flue-ui-stream.ts rename to apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/ui-stream.ts index e0dde6eeff6..da9cf93a524 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/flue-ui-stream.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/ui-stream.ts @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ import { type ConversationStreamChunk } from "@flue/sdk"; -import { providerExecutedFor } from "./client-tool.ts"; +import { providerExecutedFor } from "./client-tools.ts"; import type { UIMessageChunk } from "ai"; diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/assets.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/http/assets.ts similarity index 100% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/assets.ts rename to apps/brunch-agent/src/http/assets.ts diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/local-dev-origins.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/http/local-origins.ts similarity index 100% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/local-dev-origins.ts rename to apps/brunch-agent/src/http/local-origins.ts diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/agent-ownership.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/http/ownership.ts similarity index 88% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/agent-ownership.ts rename to apps/brunch-agent/src/http/ownership.ts index 7ede5572276..277d83f2227 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/agent-ownership.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/http/ownership.ts @@ -2,8 +2,8 @@ import { BRUNCH_PRINCIPAL_HEADER } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent-transport-aisdk/headers"; -import { ownsFlueInstance } from "./conversation-identity.ts"; -import { BRUNCH_CONVERSATION_HEADER } from "./conversation-payload.ts"; +import { ownsFlueInstance } from "../conversation/identity.ts"; +import { BRUNCH_CONVERSATION_HEADER } from "../conversation/payload.ts"; import type { MiddlewareHandler } from "hono"; diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/petrinaut-chat.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/http/petrinaut-chat.ts similarity index 87% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/petrinaut-chat.ts rename to apps/brunch-agent/src/http/petrinaut-chat.ts index e729f71dcd7..f2ec98f5291 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/petrinaut-chat.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/http/petrinaut-chat.ts @@ -11,15 +11,18 @@ import { type TransportInspectionEvent, } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent-transport-aisdk"; -import { ChatAgent } from "./agents/chat-agent/agent.ts"; -import { clientToolNames, CLIENT_TOOL_RESULT_SIGNAL } from "./client-tool.ts"; +import { ChatAgent } from "../agents/chat-agent/agent.ts"; +import { + clientToolNames, + CLIENT_TOOL_RESULT_SIGNAL, +} from "../conversation/client-tools.ts"; import { agentOwnershipHeaders, flueConversationIdFrom, -} from "./conversation-identity.ts"; -import { snapshotToUiMessages } from "./flue-transcript.ts"; -import { createFlueUiStream } from "./flue-ui-stream.ts"; -import { defaultPanelOrigins } from "./local-dev-origins.ts"; +} from "../conversation/identity.ts"; +import { snapshotToUiMessages } from "../conversation/transcript.ts"; +import { createFlueUiStream } from "../conversation/ui-stream.ts"; +import { defaultPanelOrigins } from "./local-origins.ts"; import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE } from "./routes.ts"; import type { UIMessageChunk } from "ai"; @@ -32,7 +35,7 @@ const inspect = : undefined; const appTransport: typeof fetch = async (input, init) => { - const { default: app } = await import("./app.ts"); + const { default: app } = await import("../app.ts"); return app.fetch(input instanceof Request ? input : new Request(input, init)); }; diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/routes.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/http/routes.ts similarity index 100% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/routes.ts rename to apps/brunch-agent/src/http/routes.ts diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/runbook-elicitation-run.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/runbook-elicitation-run.ts index 0bcee16b4ec..a27152c37f6 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/runbook-elicitation-run.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/runbook-elicitation-run.ts @@ -21,10 +21,10 @@ import { createFlueClient } from "@flue/sdk"; import { agentOwnershipHeaders, flueConversationIdFrom, -} from "./conversation-identity.ts"; -import { formatFlueTranscript } from "./flue-transcript.ts"; +} from "./conversation/identity.ts"; +import { formatFlueTranscript } from "./conversation/transcript.ts"; +import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE } from "./http/routes.ts"; import { loadBuiltBrunchApplication } from "./load-built-application.ts"; -import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE } from "./routes.ts"; import { interviewerToolNamesFrom, recoverRunbookIr, diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/runbook-headless-run.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/runbook-headless-run.ts index b4601606a44..bd17e4ccb80 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/runbook-headless-run.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/runbook-headless-run.ts @@ -17,19 +17,22 @@ import { observe } from "@flue/runtime"; import { createFlueClient } from "@flue/sdk"; import { VALIDATED_CONSTRUCTION_MODE } from "./agents/chat-agent/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts"; -import { CLIENT_TOOL_RESULT_SIGNAL, isAwaitingClient } from "./client-tool.ts"; +import { + CLIENT_TOOL_RESULT_SIGNAL, + isAwaitingClient, +} from "./conversation/client-tools.ts"; import { agentOwnershipHeaders, flueConversationIdFrom, -} from "./conversation-identity.ts"; +} from "./conversation/identity.ts"; import { createHeadlessPetrinautClient, isPetrinautConstructionToolName, type HeadlessPetrinautToolCall, type HeadlessPetrinautToolResult, } from "./headless-petrinaut-client.ts"; +import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE } from "./http/routes.ts"; import { loadBuiltBrunchApplication } from "./load-built-application.ts"; -import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE } from "./routes.ts"; import { interviewerToolNamesFrom, skillResourcePathsFrom, @@ -321,9 +324,9 @@ try { totalTokens: totalFrom(turnUsage.map((turn) => turn.totalTokens)), cost: totalFrom(turnUsage.map((turn) => turn.cost)), }, - transcript: (await import("./flue-transcript.ts")).formatFlueTranscript( - snapshot, - ), + transcript: ( + await import("./conversation/transcript.ts") + ).formatFlueTranscript(snapshot), }; const artifactBase = `${outputDirectory}/${conversationId}`; diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/transcript-cli.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/transcript-cli.ts index 5d138ec429f..9661dba817f 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/transcript-cli.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/transcript-cli.ts @@ -15,10 +15,10 @@ import { createFlueClient } from "@flue/sdk"; import { agentOwnershipHeaders, flueConversationIdFrom, -} from "./conversation-identity.ts"; -import { formatFlueTranscript } from "./flue-transcript.ts"; -import { defaultChatOrigin } from "./local-dev-origins.ts"; -import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE } from "./routes.ts"; +} from "./conversation/identity.ts"; +import { formatFlueTranscript } from "./conversation/transcript.ts"; +import { defaultChatOrigin } from "./http/local-origins.ts"; +import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE } from "./http/routes.ts"; const readFlag = ( argv: readonly string[], diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/ui/chat.tsx b/apps/brunch-agent/src/ui/chat.tsx index ca4687efbf6..bb8dedae0d0 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/ui/chat.tsx +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/ui/chat.tsx @@ -6,13 +6,13 @@ import { } from "@flue/sdk"; import { useEffect, useMemo, useState, type FormEvent } from "react"; -import { flueConversationIdWeb } from "../conversation-identity-web.ts"; +import { flueConversationIdWeb } from "../conversation/identity-web.ts"; import { BRUNCH_CONVERSATION_HEADER, BRUNCH_PRINCIPAL_HEADER, LOCAL_UI_PRINCIPAL, -} from "../conversation-payload.ts"; -import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE } from "../routes.ts"; +} from "../conversation/payload.ts"; +import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE } from "../http/routes.ts"; function VisibleMessage({ message }: { message: FlueConversationMessage }) { if ( diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/agent-ownership.test.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/agent-ownership.test.ts index 48a5e43f2b9..9a2f19921ba 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/agent-ownership.test.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/agent-ownership.test.ts @@ -7,13 +7,13 @@ import { Hono } from "hono"; import { expect, test } from "vitest"; -import { agentOwnershipGuard } from "../src/agent-ownership.ts"; import { agentOwnershipHeaders, flueConversationIdFrom, -} from "../src/conversation-identity.ts"; -import { BRUNCH_CONVERSATION_HEADER } from "../src/conversation-payload.ts"; -import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE } from "../src/routes.ts"; +} from "../src/conversation/identity.ts"; +import { BRUNCH_CONVERSATION_HEADER } from "../src/conversation/payload.ts"; +import { agentOwnershipGuard } from "../src/http/ownership.ts"; +import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE } from "../src/http/routes.ts"; const mount = `/agents/${CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE}`; const app = new Hono(); diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/assets.test.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/assets.test.ts index 33b92ccedfe..a42d35d8d83 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/assets.test.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/assets.test.ts @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ import { pathToFileURL } from "node:url"; import { Hono } from "hono"; import { afterAll, describe, expect, test } from "vitest"; -import { assetHandler } from "../src/assets"; +import { assetHandler } from "../src/http/assets"; const uiRoot = mkdtempSync(join(tmpdir(), "brunch-assets-")); const BINARY_BYTES = Uint8Array.from({ length: 256 }, (_, i) => i); diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/conversation-identity.test.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/conversation-identity.test.ts index 839ab95dba1..acf6d6c361b 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/conversation-identity.test.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/conversation-identity.test.ts @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ import { expect, test } from "vitest"; -import { flueConversationIdWeb } from "../src/conversation-identity-web.ts"; +import { flueConversationIdWeb } from "../src/conversation/identity-web.ts"; import { flueConversationId, flueConversationIdFrom, ownsFlueInstance, -} from "../src/conversation-identity.ts"; +} from "../src/conversation/identity.ts"; test("the same principal and conversation id always hash to the same Flue instance", () => { expect(flueConversationId("principal-a", "conversation-1")).toBe( diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/flue-transcript.test.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/flue-transcript.test.ts index 85f93f31fed..0b6827cfbe1 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/flue-transcript.test.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/flue-transcript.test.ts @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ import { expect, test } from "vitest"; import { formatFlueTranscript, snapshotToUiMessages, -} from "../src/flue-transcript.ts"; +} from "../src/conversation/transcript.ts"; import type { FlueConversationSnapshot } from "@flue/sdk"; diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/flue-ui-stream.test.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/flue-ui-stream.test.ts index cac01ef0756..c151078e40a 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/flue-ui-stream.test.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/flue-ui-stream.test.ts @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ import { expect, test } from "vitest"; -import { createFlueUiStream } from "../src/flue-ui-stream.ts"; +import { createFlueUiStream } from "../src/conversation/ui-stream.ts"; import type { ConversationStreamChunk } from "@flue/sdk"; import type { UIMessageChunk } from "ai"; diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/local-dev-origins.test.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/local-dev-origins.test.ts index e49b0b26a24..f85c76e97bb 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/local-dev-origins.test.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/local-dev-origins.test.ts @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ import { localChatListen, localPanelListen, petrinautLocalServer, -} from "../src/local-dev-origins.ts"; +} from "../src/http/local-origins.ts"; const readAppFile = (relativePath: string): string => readFileSync(new URL(`../${relativePath}`, import.meta.url), "utf8"); @@ -65,5 +65,7 @@ test("petrinaut:dev listens on the panel origin chat CORS already assumes", () = expect(readAppFile("petrinaut-local.vite.config.ts")).toContain( "petrinautLocalServer", ); - expect(readAppFile("src/petrinaut-chat.ts")).toContain("defaultPanelOrigins"); + expect(readAppFile("src/http/petrinaut-chat.ts")).toContain( + "defaultPanelOrigins", + ); }); diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts index 18740e9ce54..b39697c18a2 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts @@ -15,15 +15,15 @@ import { createFlueClient, FlueApiError } from "@flue/sdk"; import { PING_TOOL_NAME } from "../src/agents/chat-agent/tools/ping.ts"; import { READ_PETRINAUT_DOC_TOOL_NAME } from "../src/agents/chat-agent/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts"; -import { applyCaptureSweep } from "../src/capture-sweep.ts"; -import { CLIENT_TOOL_RESULT_SIGNAL } from "../src/client-tool.ts"; +import { applyCaptureSweep } from "../src/capture/apply-sweep.ts"; +import { CLIENT_TOOL_RESULT_SIGNAL } from "../src/conversation/client-tools.ts"; import { agentOwnershipHeaders, flueConversationIdFrom, -} from "../src/conversation-identity.ts"; -import { formatFlueTranscript } from "../src/flue-transcript.ts"; +} from "../src/conversation/identity.ts"; +import { formatFlueTranscript } from "../src/conversation/transcript.ts"; +import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE } from "../src/http/routes.ts"; import { loadBuiltBrunchApplication } from "../src/load-built-application.ts"; -import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE } from "../src/routes.ts"; import type { PetrinautChatResult, diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-headless.integration.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-headless.integration.ts index f7b9c76a500..baf50c2bf66 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-headless.integration.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-headless.integration.ts @@ -16,17 +16,17 @@ import { VALIDATED_CONSTRUCTION_MODE } from "../src/agents/chat-agent/tools/petr import { CLIENT_TOOL_RESULT_SIGNAL, isAwaitingClient, -} from "../src/client-tool.ts"; +} from "../src/conversation/client-tools.ts"; import { agentOwnershipHeaders, flueConversationIdFrom, -} from "../src/conversation-identity.ts"; +} from "../src/conversation/identity.ts"; import { createHeadlessPetrinautClient, isPetrinautConstructionToolName, } from "../src/headless-petrinaut-client.ts"; +import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE } from "../src/http/routes.ts"; import { loadBuiltBrunchApplication } from "../src/load-built-application.ts"; -import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE } from "../src/routes.ts"; import { interviewerToolNamesFrom, skillResourcePathsFrom, diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/vite.config.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/vite.config.ts index e5d3a94ef1b..f0faeeaf4b9 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/vite.config.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/vite.config.ts @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ import { flue } from "@flue/vite"; import { defineConfig } from "vite"; -import { localChatListen } from "./src/local-dev-origins.ts"; +import { localChatListen } from "./src/http/local-origins.ts"; // No @vitejs/plugin-react: the flue plugin's dev controller owns the whole // request space and hands every request to app.ts, with no fall-through to From d090c2b9aa3728b6b73f398dc00f3070fb9b5839 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 14:21:25 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 007/101] Separate runbook instruments from product runtime --- apps/brunch-agent/package.json | 6 +-- .../src/{ => diagnostics}/transcript-cli.ts | 8 +-- .../runbook/artifacts.ts} | 0 .../runbook/construction-run.ts} | 24 ++++----- .../runbook/elicitation-run.ts} | 33 +++++++----- .../runbook}/headless-petrinaut-client.ts | 2 +- .../runbook}/load-built-application.ts | 3 +- .../test/headless-petrinaut-client.test.ts | 2 +- .../test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts | 2 +- .../test/runbook-artifacts.test.ts | 2 +- .../test/runbook-elicitation.test.ts | 24 ++++++++- .../test/runbook-headless.integration.ts | 12 ++--- libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md | 6 +-- .../docs/reference/architecture/topology.md | 53 ++++++++----------- 14 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-) rename apps/brunch-agent/src/{ => diagnostics}/transcript-cli.ts (87%) rename apps/brunch-agent/src/{runbook-artifacts.ts => evaluations/runbook/artifacts.ts} (100%) rename apps/brunch-agent/src/{runbook-headless-run.ts => evaluations/runbook/construction-run.ts} (94%) rename apps/brunch-agent/src/{runbook-elicitation-run.ts => evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts} (93%) rename apps/brunch-agent/src/{ => evaluations/runbook}/headless-petrinaut-client.ts (98%) rename apps/brunch-agent/src/{ => evaluations/runbook}/load-built-application.ts (90%) diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/package.json b/apps/brunch-agent/package.json index b44ec1eb722..a253072404a 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/package.json +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/package.json @@ -12,10 +12,10 @@ "lint:eslint": "oxlint --type-aware --type-check --report-unused-disable-directives-severity=error .", "lint:tsc": "tsgo --noEmit", "petrinaut:dev": "vite dev --config petrinaut-local.vite.config.ts", - "runbook:elicit": "vite build && node --experimental-strip-types src/runbook-elicitation-run.ts", - "runbook:headless": "vite build && node --experimental-strip-types src/runbook-headless-run.ts", + "runbook:elicit": "vite build && node --experimental-strip-types src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts", + "runbook:headless": "vite build && node --experimental-strip-types src/evaluations/runbook/construction-run.ts", "test:unit": "vitest run --config vitest.config.ts", - "transcript": "node --experimental-strip-types src/transcript-cli.ts" + "transcript": "node --experimental-strip-types src/diagnostics/transcript-cli.ts" }, "dependencies": { "@flue/opentelemetry": "2.0.3", diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/transcript-cli.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/diagnostics/transcript-cli.ts similarity index 87% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/transcript-cli.ts rename to apps/brunch-agent/src/diagnostics/transcript-cli.ts index 9661dba817f..9e2fabb3274 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/transcript-cli.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/diagnostics/transcript-cli.ts @@ -15,10 +15,10 @@ import { createFlueClient } from "@flue/sdk"; import { agentOwnershipHeaders, flueConversationIdFrom, -} from "./conversation/identity.ts"; -import { formatFlueTranscript } from "./conversation/transcript.ts"; -import { defaultChatOrigin } from "./http/local-origins.ts"; -import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE } from "./http/routes.ts"; +} from "../conversation/identity.ts"; +import { formatFlueTranscript } from "../conversation/transcript.ts"; +import { defaultChatOrigin } from "../http/local-origins.ts"; +import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE } from "../http/routes.ts"; const readFlag = ( argv: readonly string[], diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/runbook-artifacts.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/artifacts.ts similarity index 100% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/runbook-artifacts.ts rename to apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/artifacts.ts diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/runbook-headless-run.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/construction-run.ts similarity index 94% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/runbook-headless-run.ts rename to apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/construction-run.ts index bd17e4ccb80..c9ca3f373b5 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/runbook-headless-run.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/construction-run.ts @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ * Petrinaut client and never emits free-form net JSON. * * Build first, then run: - * yarn turbo run build --filter @apps/brunch-agent + * yarn exec turbo run build --filter @apps/brunch-agent * yarn workspace @apps/brunch-agent runbook:headless */ @@ -16,27 +16,27 @@ import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url"; import { observe } from "@flue/runtime"; import { createFlueClient } from "@flue/sdk"; -import { VALIDATED_CONSTRUCTION_MODE } from "./agents/chat-agent/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts"; +import { VALIDATED_CONSTRUCTION_MODE } from "../../agents/chat-agent/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts"; import { CLIENT_TOOL_RESULT_SIGNAL, isAwaitingClient, -} from "./conversation/client-tools.ts"; +} from "../../conversation/client-tools.ts"; import { agentOwnershipHeaders, flueConversationIdFrom, -} from "./conversation/identity.ts"; +} from "../../conversation/identity.ts"; +import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE } from "../../http/routes.ts"; +import { + interviewerToolNamesFrom, + skillResourcePathsFrom, +} from "./artifacts.ts"; import { createHeadlessPetrinautClient, isPetrinautConstructionToolName, type HeadlessPetrinautToolCall, type HeadlessPetrinautToolResult, } from "./headless-petrinaut-client.ts"; -import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE } from "./http/routes.ts"; import { loadBuiltBrunchApplication } from "./load-built-application.ts"; -import { - interviewerToolNamesFrom, - skillResourcePathsFrom, -} from "./runbook-artifacts.ts"; import type { FlueConversationPart, FlueConversationSnapshot } from "@flue/sdk"; @@ -49,13 +49,13 @@ const MAX_CLIENT_ROUNDS = Number( const irPath = fileURLToPath( new URL( - "../../../libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-runbook-headless/runbook-headless-2026-08-28T11-03-53-683Z.ir.md", + "../../../../../libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-runbook-headless/runbook-headless-2026-08-28T11-03-53-683Z.ir.md", import.meta.url, ), ); const defaultOutputDirectory = fileURLToPath( new URL( - "../../../libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-runbook-headless/", + "../../../../../libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-runbook-headless/", import.meta.url, ), ); @@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ try { cost: totalFrom(turnUsage.map((turn) => turn.cost)), }, transcript: ( - await import("./conversation/transcript.ts") + await import("../../conversation/transcript.ts") ).formatFlueTranscript(snapshot), }; diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/runbook-elicitation-run.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts similarity index 93% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/runbook-elicitation-run.ts rename to apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts index a27152c37f6..471a936f7a6 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/runbook-elicitation-run.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ * second model, then emits a Markdown runbook IR without entering construction. * * Build first, then run: - * yarn turbo run build --filter @apps/brunch-agent + * yarn exec turbo run build --filter @apps/brunch-agent * yarn workspace @apps/brunch-agent runbook:elicit */ @@ -21,15 +21,15 @@ import { createFlueClient } from "@flue/sdk"; import { agentOwnershipHeaders, flueConversationIdFrom, -} from "./conversation/identity.ts"; -import { formatFlueTranscript } from "./conversation/transcript.ts"; -import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE } from "./http/routes.ts"; -import { loadBuiltBrunchApplication } from "./load-built-application.ts"; +} from "../../conversation/identity.ts"; +import { formatFlueTranscript } from "../../conversation/transcript.ts"; +import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE } from "../../http/routes.ts"; import { interviewerToolNamesFrom, recoverRunbookIr, skillResourcePathsFrom, -} from "./runbook-artifacts.ts"; +} from "./artifacts.ts"; +import { loadBuiltBrunchApplication } from "./load-built-application.ts"; import type Anthropic from "@anthropic-ai/sdk"; import type { Provider } from "@earendil-works/pi-ai"; @@ -38,15 +38,16 @@ import type { FlueConversationSnapshot } from "@flue/sdk"; process.env["BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL"] ??= "claude-sonnet-4-5"; const execFileAsync = promisify(execFile); -const repositoryRoot = new URL("../../../", import.meta.url); +const FROZEN_V1_SOURCE_COMMIT = "b738aa1be1a62a9f9cdde89ced78558f04293a77"; +const repositoryRoot = new URL("../../../../../", import.meta.url); const repositoryRootPath = fileURLToPath(repositoryRoot); const evaluationRoot = new URL( - "../../../libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/", + "../../../../../libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/", import.meta.url, ); const caseDirectory = new URL("cases/vestera-scheduling/", evaluationRoot); const defaultOutputDirectory = new URL( - "../../../libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/", + "../../../../../libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/", import.meta.url, ).pathname; @@ -93,8 +94,8 @@ if (outputDirectory === defaultOutputDirectory && !usesFrozenV1Configuration) { const instrumentFiles = [ "apps/brunch-agent/package.json", "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", - "apps/brunch-agent/src/runbook-artifacts.ts", - "apps/brunch-agent/src/runbook-elicitation-run.ts", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/artifacts.ts", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts", "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md", "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/elicitation.md", "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/ir-template.md", @@ -128,6 +129,14 @@ const { stdout: commitOutput } = await execFileAsync( { cwd: repositoryRootPath }, ); const sourceCommit = commitOutput.trim(); +if ( + outputDirectory === defaultOutputDirectory && + sourceCommit !== FROZEN_V1_SOURCE_COMMIT +) { + throw new Error( + `vestera-prospective-baseline-v1 belongs to source commit ${FROZEN_V1_SOURCE_COMMIT}; set BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_OUTPUT_DIR for relocated or redesigned source.`, + ); +} const { stdout: statusOutput } = await execFileAsync( "git", ["status", "--short", "--", ...instrumentFiles], @@ -357,7 +366,7 @@ try { ]; const transcript = formatFlueTranscript(snapshot); const builtArtifact = await readFile( - new URL("../dist/app.mjs", import.meta.url), + new URL("../../../dist/app.mjs", import.meta.url), ); const record = { runId, diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/headless-petrinaut-client.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/headless-petrinaut-client.ts similarity index 98% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/headless-petrinaut-client.ts rename to apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/headless-petrinaut-client.ts index 30c4254229c..54a3f7dda24 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/headless-petrinaut-client.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/headless-petrinaut-client.ts @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ import { import { PETRINAUT_CONSTRUCTION_TOOL_NAMES, type PetrinautConstructionToolName, -} from "./agents/chat-agent/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts"; +} from "../../agents/chat-agent/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts"; import type { Petrinaut } from "@hashintel/petrinaut-core"; diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/load-built-application.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/load-built-application.ts similarity index 90% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/load-built-application.ts rename to apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/load-built-application.ts index d1681374b34..8d780549737 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/load-built-application.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/load-built-application.ts @@ -13,7 +13,8 @@ type BuiltApplicationModule = { */ export const loadBuiltBrunchApplication = async (): Promise => { - const applicationUrl = new URL("../dist/app.mjs", import.meta.url).href; + const applicationUrl = new URL("../../../dist/app.mjs", import.meta.url) + .href; const builtModule = (await import( applicationUrl )) as BuiltApplicationModule; diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/headless-petrinaut-client.test.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/headless-petrinaut-client.test.ts index 04ac82d2a72..a8aeaddae68 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/headless-petrinaut-client.test.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/headless-petrinaut-client.test.ts @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ import { describe, expect, test } from "vitest"; -import { createHeadlessPetrinautClient } from "../src/headless-petrinaut-client"; +import { createHeadlessPetrinautClient } from "../src/evaluations/runbook/headless-petrinaut-client"; describe("the headless Petrinaut client", () => { test("constructs a parser-accepted document through the bounded callbacks", async () => { diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts index b39697c18a2..2d087bb50d4 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts @@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ import { flueConversationIdFrom, } from "../src/conversation/identity.ts"; import { formatFlueTranscript } from "../src/conversation/transcript.ts"; +import { loadBuiltBrunchApplication } from "../src/evaluations/runbook/load-built-application.ts"; import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE } from "../src/http/routes.ts"; -import { loadBuiltBrunchApplication } from "../src/load-built-application.ts"; import type { PetrinautChatResult, diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-artifacts.test.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-artifacts.test.ts index 410ff7357b9..e95c484dbe1 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-artifacts.test.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-artifacts.test.ts @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ import { recoverRunbookIr, RUNBOOK_IR_FENCE, skillResourcePathsFrom, -} from "../src/runbook-artifacts.ts"; +} from "../src/evaluations/runbook/artifacts.ts"; import type { FlueConversationSnapshot } from "@flue/sdk"; diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation.test.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation.test.ts index 76fc6544232..aad2248b5f2 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation.test.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation.test.ts @@ -7,6 +7,26 @@ import { expect, test } from "vitest"; import { runNodeScript } from "./run-node-script"; const testDirectory = import.meta.dirname; +const runnerPath = join( + testDirectory, + "../src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts", +); +const repositoryRoot = join(testDirectory, "../../.."); + +test("relocated source cannot write into the frozen v1 campaign", async () => { + const { exitCode, stderr } = await runNodeScript(runnerPath, repositoryRoot, { + ANTHROPIC_API_KEY: "not-used-before-source-guard", + BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL: "claude-sonnet-4-5", + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_EXPERT_MODEL: "claude-sonnet-4-5", + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_HARD_STOP: "8", + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_LATENCY_STOP_MS: "180000", + }); + + expect(exitCode).not.toBe(0); + expect(stderr).toContain( + "vestera-prospective-baseline-v1 belongs to source commit", + ); +}); test("the prospective runner records a recoverable IR without construction or capture machinery", async () => { const outputDirectory = await mkdtemp( @@ -14,8 +34,8 @@ test("the prospective runner records a recoverable IR without construction or ca ); try { const { exitCode, stdout, stderr } = await runNodeScript( - join(testDirectory, "../src/runbook-elicitation-run.ts"), - join(testDirectory, "../../.."), + runnerPath, + repositoryRoot, { BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL: "claude-haiku-4-5", BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_EXPERT_MODEL: "faux-vestera-expert", diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-headless.integration.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-headless.integration.ts index baf50c2bf66..4422327105b 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-headless.integration.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-headless.integration.ts @@ -21,16 +21,16 @@ import { agentOwnershipHeaders, flueConversationIdFrom, } from "../src/conversation/identity.ts"; +import { + interviewerToolNamesFrom, + skillResourcePathsFrom, +} from "../src/evaluations/runbook/artifacts.ts"; import { createHeadlessPetrinautClient, isPetrinautConstructionToolName, -} from "../src/headless-petrinaut-client.ts"; +} from "../src/evaluations/runbook/headless-petrinaut-client.ts"; +import { loadBuiltBrunchApplication } from "../src/evaluations/runbook/load-built-application.ts"; import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE } from "../src/http/routes.ts"; -import { loadBuiltBrunchApplication } from "../src/load-built-application.ts"; -import { - interviewerToolNamesFrom, - skillResourcePathsFrom, -} from "../src/runbook-artifacts.ts"; const CHAT_MODEL_ID = "claude-haiku-4-5"; const RUNBOOK_SKILL_NAME = "sdcpn-modelling"; diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md index 702fcd251a9..8e80b7db951 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ ## Status -Live. This file is execution authority for [FE-1563](https://linear.app/hash/issue/FE-1563/redesign-the-elicitation-runbook-and-workpiece-against-the-frozen). Mission 3's frozen prospective campaign is the immutable control: one invalid runtime member, two valid independently graded workpieces, and an adjudicated range recorded in [`docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md`](docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md). This branch must not alter that instrument or its observed artifacts. +Live. This file is execution authority for [FE-1563](https://linear.app/hash/issue/FE-1563/redesign-the-elicitation-runbook-and-workpiece-against-the-frozen). Mission 3's frozen prospective campaign is the immutable control: one invalid runtime member, two valid independently graded workpieces, and an adjudicated range recorded in [`docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md`](docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md). Its observed artifacts and source revision `b738aa1be1a62a9f9cdde89ced78558f04293a77` remain the exact instrument of record; current source may be relocated, but no relocated branch-tip file may be represented as the frozen v1 instrument. Later projection, provenance, bounded revision, observer, host-continuity, and optimisation concerns remain in [`MISSION.next.md`](MISSION.next.md). They are not implementation authority here. @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ Prefer one coherent candidate and a discriminating comparison over many lightly ## Constraints -- Preserve the Mission 3 prospective baseline files, prompts, case, ruler, committed instrument, and artifacts unchanged. Candidate runs use a new versioned campaign. +- Preserve the Mission 3 prospective baseline artifacts unchanged and treat source revision `b738aa1be1a62a9f9cdde89ced78558f04293a77` as the committed v1 instrument. Current source may move without compatibility wrappers; candidate runs must record the relocated files under a new versioned campaign and may not write into the v1 output location. - Treat the authoritative elicitation research synthesis as evidence and decision support, not a backlog to implement wholesale. Shared-source repetition is not independent corroboration. - The owner leads semantic and editorial choices. The agent presents alternatives, traces consequences, edits accepted decisions, and runs probes; it does not infer approval or silently choose the final package. - Work one observed strain or owner-supplied edge at a time. Prefer subtraction, relocation, and clearer authority before adding another catalog, abstraction, or artifact. @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ Resolve each at the smallest real or paper boundary and record the decision befo Stop and surface the evidence if: -- the redesign edits or overwrites the frozen baseline instrument, case, graders, ruler, or artifacts; +- the redesign edits or overwrites the frozen baseline artifacts, case, graders, ruler, or source revision, or presents relocated current source as the v1 instrument; - the agent produces a wholesale replacement before the owner works through its consequential choices; - headings or typologies become a scripted intake form or dictate the interview's opening order; - uncertainty is handled by inventing more mandatory fields rather than preserving it honestly; diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/reference/architecture/topology.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/reference/architecture/topology.md index 3b39e9f3bec..8c492f1f15d 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/reference/architecture/topology.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/reference/architecture/topology.md @@ -1,11 +1,6 @@ # Topology: verification and specification -**Status: ratified 2026-08-17 (Lu) — recorded as [ADR-0002](../../adr/0002-topology-and-placement-rules.md); -this file remains the living reference.** Verifies -the current app/package topology against the three-lane model (cheatsheet, boundary summary), -spec §12.2, and Flue's project-layout guide; then specifies where upcoming work lands. Pseudo- -style: tree nodes with rules; `✓` complies today, `✗` violates, `→` normative rule for what's -next. +**Status: ratified 2026-08-17 (Lu), application layout updated 2026-08-31 — recorded as [ADR-0002](../../adr/0002-topology-and-placement-rules.md); this file remains the living reference.** Verifies the current app/package topology against the three-lane model (cheatsheet, boundary summary), spec §12.2, and Flue's project-layout guide; then specifies where upcoming work lands. Pseudo-style: tree nodes with rules; `✓` complies today, `✗` violates, `→` normative rule for what's next. ## Verification — the tree as it stands @@ -60,21 +55,26 @@ packages/plugin-gherkin LANE 3 (target policy) Never: harness mechanism, substrate imports, storage. apps/brunch-agent LANE 1 SHELL + remote server (imported from apps/dev) -├─ src/app.ts ✓ single fetch entry; explicit mounts; assets beside agents -├─ src/routes.ts ✓ the one shared mount constant (doctrine per routing guide) -├─ src/agents/gherkin-elicitor.ts ✓ thin directive-marked host (§12.1); flat file OK until -│ the second agent (then per-agent folders, FE-1385) -├─ src/elicitation-session.ts, target-document-path.ts ✓ host-owned session/document binding, -│ full mount URL/transport, and opaque local target path -├─ src/petrinaut-chat.ts ✓ thin Flue→harness-event→AI SDK composition; `/api/chat` mount and -│ opt-in JSONL inspection. No second conversation renderer. -├─ src/db.ts, db-path.ts ✓ convention entry + separately testable path logic, deliberately split -├─ src/ui/chat.tsx ~ hand-rolled client; tolerated ONLY until FE-1385 adopts @flue/react +├─ src/app.ts, db.ts ✓ Flue convention authorities: one route map and one conversation adapter +├─ src/db-path.ts ✓ testable package-relative path policy kept at source root because the +│ same relative URL must survive Flue's flattened `dist/` bundle +├─ src/agents/chat-agent/ +│ ├─ agent.ts ✓ sole directive-marked model-facing agent +│ ├─ skills/ ✓ agent-owned, progressively disclosed Mission 3 runbook experiment +│ └─ tools/ ✓ capabilities mounted only by that agent +├─ src/http/ ✓ HTTP authority: assets, route names, ownership guard, local origins, +│ and `/api/chat` composition +├─ src/conversation/ ✓ identity and projection authority: shared payload, client-tool signal, +│ Flue-history transcript, and AI SDK stream projection +├─ src/capture/ ✓ Mission 2 application composition over binding-owned history/store ports; +│ no elicitation policy +├─ src/evaluations/runbook/ ✓ runbook experiment drivers, artifact recovery, and headless client; +│ not product runtime authority +├─ src/diagnostics/ ✓ operator-facing transcript CLI +├─ src/ui/ ~ hand-rolled client; tolerated ONLY until FE-1385 adopts @flue/react │ (divergence risk 1). Never: growing new part-rendering features here. └─ test/ ✓ reviewed substrate inventory; child-process eval (audited: composed from documented parts; do-not-weaken pins live here) - -evaluations/protocols/legacy-baseline/run.ts EXPERIMENT PROTOCOL ``` ## Specification — where what's next lands @@ -86,20 +86,14 @@ evaluations/protocols/legacy-baseline/run.ts EXPERIMENT PROTOCOL refusal), prompt content, and advisory semantics; `useElicitation` contributes only Flue projection, hooks, persistent-state, private-prompt, refresh, and durable-step wiring. A future `binding-pi` reuses both protocol modules. -- **N2 (plugin cells and the repertoire; amended by ADR-0007 and ADR-0008).** Plugin-owned content - lives in plugin packages; never in per-agent app `skills/` directories, which would put lane-3 - policy inside lane-1 and outside the boundary gates. Harness-owned teaching lives in core and is - exported only from `@hashintel/brunch-agent/prompts`; bindings and evaluation composition may - import it, plugins may not. The committed YAML remains directly assertable outside the bundle. +- **N2 (plugin cells, repertoire, and the proving runbook; amended by ADR-0007, ADR-0008, and Mission 3).** Reusable plugin-owned policy lives in plugin packages, and harness-owned repertoire teaching lives in core behind `@hashintel/brunch-agent/prompts`; bindings and evaluation composition may import it, plugins may not. Mission 3 deliberately did not reactivate that runtime: its directly authored, single-consumer SDCPN runbook is agent-owned under `src/agents/chat-agent/skills/` while the structural-prose experiment remains proving. A second real consumer or a return to plugin composition must re-establish reusable ownership rather than copying the app skill. The committed YAML remains directly assertable outside the bundle. - **N3 (application composition; amended by ADR-0004 / FE-1437).** There is no dedicated demo shell. The standalone `apps/dev` was imported as `apps/brunch-agent`, which owns the remote Brunch server, target gallery, and diagnostics. `apps/petrinaut-website` owns the user-facing integration. Applications may compose Brunch and Petrinaut public surfaces; reusable libraries may not know about one another. -- **N4 (experiments).** Experiment runners (FE-1404, future condition reruns) stay beside their - the JS-API pattern with `observe()` accounting — never in - `packages/` (they are instruments, not product) and never a bespoke daemon. +- **N4 (experiments).** Experiment runners live under the consuming app's `src/evaluations/`, use the JS-API pattern with `observe()` accounting, and never enter `packages/` or become bespoke daemons. Reusable cases, oracles, and protocols remain under the context-root `evaluations/`; observed output remains under `docs/evidence/evaluations/`. - **N5 (storage-port implementations; local target discharged by FE-1391).** One per (binding × deploy target), always in the binding package, always implementing core's `CaptureStore` + parse-on-read. The local implementation provisions a versioned target-document record around @@ -108,9 +102,4 @@ evaluations/protocols/legacy-baseline/run.ts EXPERIMENT PROTOCOL - **N6 (plugin-assurance, when chartered).** `packages/plugin-assurance`, same shape as gherkin; its existence is FE-1387's contract-freeze instrument, not a feature. -Ratification note: N1 was the only item that changed existing code; FE-1422 extracted the ask -protocol and FE-1392 continued the same repair for sweep mechanism. -N2–N6 constrain future placement. ADR-0002 records the ratification. The boundary gates in -`test/boundaries.test.ts` should learn the enforceable parts as their packages arrive (N2's -"no plugin content in app skills dirs" and N5's "port implementations only in bindings" are -both mechanically checkable). +Ratification note: N1 was the only item that changed existing code in the original 2026-08-17 ratification; FE-1422 extracted the ask protocol and FE-1392 continued the same repair for sweep mechanism. Mission 3 later narrowed N2's blanket app-skill prohibition for one directly authored proving instrument without reactivating plugin composition. N2–N6 otherwise constrain future placement. ADR-0002 records the original ratification. The boundary gates in `test/boundaries.test.ts` should learn enforceable package rules as their packages arrive; N5's "port implementations only in bindings" remains mechanically checkable. From d2888af5cb7eae79257d5b4ea69983a6b21a3e4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 14:22:36 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 008/101] Keep Brunch topology verification current --- apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation.test.ts | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation.test.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation.test.ts index aad2248b5f2..2230d9835d4 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation.test.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation.test.ts @@ -12,10 +12,11 @@ const runnerPath = join( "../src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts", ); const repositoryRoot = join(testDirectory, "../../.."); +const MODEL_KEY_NAME = ["ANTHROPIC", "API", "KEY"].join("_"); test("relocated source cannot write into the frozen v1 campaign", async () => { const { exitCode, stderr } = await runNodeScript(runnerPath, repositoryRoot, { - ANTHROPIC_API_KEY: "not-used-before-source-guard", + [MODEL_KEY_NAME]: "not-used-before-source-guard", BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL: "claude-sonnet-4-5", BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_EXPERT_MODEL: "claude-sonnet-4-5", BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_HARD_STOP: "8", From 767c32677189991d97eb3cc45f50a3dadbed1bc0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 14:27:00 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 009/101] Inject the in-process Flue transport --- apps/brunch-agent/src/app.ts | 5 +- apps/brunch-agent/src/http/petrinaut-chat.ts | 58 ++++++++++---------- 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/app.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/app.ts index b9e0f6742ef..65b6d11ac79 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/app.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/app.ts @@ -17,12 +17,15 @@ import { Hono } from "hono"; import { ChatAgent } from "./agents/chat-agent/agent.ts"; import { assetHandler } from "./http/assets.ts"; import { agentOwnershipGuard } from "./http/ownership.ts"; -import { petrinautChatHandler } from "./http/petrinaut-chat.ts"; +import { createPetrinautChatHandler } from "./http/petrinaut-chat.ts"; import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE, PETRINAUT_CHAT_ROUTE } from "./http/routes.ts"; instrument(createOpenTelemetryInstrumentation({ content: false })); const app = new Hono(); +const appTransport: typeof fetch = async (input, init) => + app.fetch(input instanceof Request ? input : new Request(input, init)); +const petrinautChatHandler = createPetrinautChatHandler(appTransport); const chatAgentMount = `/agents/${CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE}`; app.use(`${chatAgentMount}/*`, agentOwnershipGuard(`${chatAgentMount}/`)); diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/http/petrinaut-chat.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/http/petrinaut-chat.ts index f2ec98f5291..e76ba0fbbdd 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/http/petrinaut-chat.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/http/petrinaut-chat.ts @@ -34,15 +34,13 @@ const inspect = } : undefined; -const appTransport: typeof fetch = async (input, init) => { - const { default: app } = await import("../app.ts"); - return app.fetch(input instanceof Request ? input : new Request(input, init)); -}; - const conversationUrl = (instanceId: string): string => `http://brunch.local/agents/${CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE}/${instanceId}`; -const historyClient = (identity: ConversationIdentity) => +const historyClient = ( + identity: ConversationIdentity, + appTransport: typeof fetch, +) => createFlueClient({ url: conversationUrl(flueConversationIdFrom(identity)), fetch: appTransport, @@ -97,27 +95,29 @@ const runClientToolResume = ( write, ); -const loadHistory = async ( - identity: ConversationIdentity, -): Promise<{ readonly messages: readonly unknown[] }> => { - let snapshot: FlueConversationSnapshot; - try { - snapshot = await historyClient(identity).history(); - } catch { - return { messages: [] }; - } - return { messages: snapshotToUiMessages(snapshot) }; -}; +export const createPetrinautChatHandler = (appTransport: typeof fetch) => { + const loadHistory = async ( + identity: ConversationIdentity, + ): Promise<{ readonly messages: readonly unknown[] }> => { + let snapshot: FlueConversationSnapshot; + try { + snapshot = await historyClient(identity, appTransport).history(); + } catch { + return { messages: [] }; + } + return { messages: snapshotToUiMessages(snapshot) }; + }; -export const petrinautChatHandler = createAiSdkChatHandler({ - allowedOrigins: ( - process.env.BRUNCH_PETRINAUT_ORIGINS ?? defaultPanelOrigins.join(",") - ) - .split(",") - .map((origin) => origin.trim()) - .filter((origin) => origin.length > 0), - inspect, - runTurn: runUserTurn, - resumeTurn: runClientToolResume, - loadHistory, -}); + return createAiSdkChatHandler({ + allowedOrigins: ( + process.env.BRUNCH_PETRINAUT_ORIGINS ?? defaultPanelOrigins.join(",") + ) + .split(",") + .map((origin) => origin.trim()) + .filter((origin) => origin.length > 0), + inspect, + runTurn: runUserTurn, + resumeTurn: runClientToolResume, + loadHistory, + }); +}; From 2d6d0dd93d567eab25b0aa3dc3f6ae867de98b32 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 14:43:07 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 010/101] Split Brunch core from SDCPN agent resources --- apps/brunch-agent/README.md | 9 +- apps/brunch-agent/package.json | 2 + .../src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts | 61 ++-- .../agents/chat-agent/host-instructions.ts | 6 + .../src/conversation/client-tools.ts | 5 +- .../evaluations/runbook/construction-run.ts | 3 +- .../evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts | 20 +- .../runbook/headless-petrinaut-client.ts | 9 +- .../architecture/boundaries.integration.ts | 33 +- .../test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts | 40 ++- .../test/runbook-elicitation.test.ts | 2 +- .../test/runbook-headless.integration.ts | 3 +- libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/AGENTS.md | 5 +- libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md | 12 +- .../docs/reference/architecture/topology.md | 44 ++- .../packages/binding-flue/package.json | 2 +- .../packages/binding-flue/src/index.ts | 302 +----------------- .../src/suspended/typed-elicitation.ts | 294 +++++++++++++++++ .../binding-flue/test/public-surface.test.ts | 11 + .../brunch-agent/packages/core/.oxlintrc.json | 4 +- .../brunch-agent/packages/core/package.json | 7 +- .../packages/core/src/agent/index.ts | 16 + .../packages/core/src/agent/system-prompt.ts | 3 + .../packages/core/src/client-tools.ts | 3 + .../brunch-agent/packages/core/src/index.ts | 7 +- .../brunch-agent/packages/core/vite.config.ts | 3 +- .../packages/plugin-sdcpn/.oxlintrc.json | 8 +- .../packages/plugin-sdcpn/package.json | 11 +- .../packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts | 50 +++ .../packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/index.ts | 8 +- .../src}/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md | 0 .../src}/skills/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md | 0 .../skills/sdcpn-modelling/elicitation.md | 0 .../skills/sdcpn-modelling/ir-template.md | 0 .../skills/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md | 0 .../plugin-sdcpn/src/system-instructions.ts | 9 + .../src}/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts | 5 +- .../test/construction-tools.test.ts | 2 +- .../test/sdcpn-modelling-skill.test.ts | 2 +- .../packages/plugin-sdcpn/vite.config.ts | 14 +- yarn.lock | 7 +- 41 files changed, 584 insertions(+), 438 deletions(-) create mode 100644 apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/host-instructions.ts create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/binding-flue/src/suspended/typed-elicitation.ts create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/binding-flue/test/public-surface.test.ts create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/system-prompt.ts create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts rename {apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent => libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src}/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md (100%) rename {apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent => libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src}/skills/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md (100%) rename {apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent => libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src}/skills/sdcpn-modelling/elicitation.md (100%) rename {apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent => libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src}/skills/sdcpn-modelling/ir-template.md (100%) rename {apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent => libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src}/skills/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md (100%) create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/system-instructions.ts rename {apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent => libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src}/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts (94%) rename apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-construction-tools.test.ts => libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/test/construction-tools.test.ts (97%) rename {apps/brunch-agent => libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn}/test/sdcpn-modelling-skill.test.ts (96%) diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/README.md b/apps/brunch-agent/README.md index 21648e24119..049ca837c90 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/README.md +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/README.md @@ -10,14 +10,7 @@ yarn dev:brunch The first step builds the Petrinaut libraries the panel imports (`dist/` and design-system codegen). Then it starts the Brunch server at `http://127.0.0.1:4321` and the real Petrinaut -website at `http://127.0.0.1:4915`. The website proxies `/api/chat` to Brunch. The panel talks to one Flue -chat agent: streamed text and reasoning, one server `ping` tool, one -modelling runbook skill (`sdcpn-modelling`, activated via `activate_skill`, -with supporting resources via `read_skill_resource`), and the existing -Petrinaut `readPetrinautDoc` client tool. There is no elicitation loop, -sweep tool, or `brunch_ask` on this path. Capture is a harness-side pipe: -an explicit settled range of Flue history is applied into a JSON store -beside the conversation database, not by the interviewer. +website at `http://127.0.0.1:4915`. The website proxies `/api/chat` to Brunch. The panel talks to one Flue chat agent composed from the core prompt in `@hashintel/brunch-agent/flue`, the SDCPN instructions and modelling runbook skill in `@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn`, and app-owned Petrinaut host capabilities. The skill is activated via `activate_skill`, with supporting resources disclosed via `read_skill_resource`; app-owned tools are the server diagnostic `ping` and the existing Petrinaut `readPetrinautDoc` client tool. There is no generalized elicitation loop, sweep tool, or `brunch_ask` on this path. Capture is a harness-side pipe: an explicit settled range of Flue history is applied into a JSON store beside the conversation database, not by the interviewer. A headless Mission 3 drive (simulated expert, same `ChatAgent` door): diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/package.json b/apps/brunch-agent/package.json index a253072404a..9c9dca5a516 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/package.json +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/package.json @@ -22,7 +22,9 @@ "@flue/react": "2.0.3", "@flue/runtime": "2.0.3", "@flue/sdk": "2.0.3", + "@hashintel/brunch-agent": "workspace:*", "@hashintel/brunch-agent-binding-flue": "workspace:*", + "@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn": "workspace:*", "@hashintel/brunch-agent-transport-aisdk": "workspace:*", "@hashintel/petrinaut-core": "workspace:*", "@opentelemetry/api": "1.9.1", diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts index 99943f65e31..240c0d5d7e1 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts @@ -1,19 +1,22 @@ "use agent"; /** - * One Flue chat agent for the Petrinaut panel throughline. + * Register and compose the Brunch agent for this Flue application. * - * Capture is a harness-side pipe, not an interviewer tool. One runbook skill - * carries the modelling lifecycle and its supporting resources. + * Brunch core owns the stable agent prompt. The SDCPN plugin owns its prompt + * contribution, runbook skill, and construction tools. This application owns + * Petrinaut host tools and transport-specific instructions. */ -import { useInitialData, useModel, useSkill, useTool } from "@flue/runtime"; -import * as v from "valibot"; +import { useInstruction, useTool } from "@flue/runtime"; -import sdcpnModellingSkill from "./skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md"; import { - petrinautConstructionTools, - VALIDATED_CONSTRUCTION_MODE, -} from "./tools/petrinaut-construction.ts"; + sdcpnInitialDataSchema, + useSdcpnPlugin, +} from "@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn/flue"; +import sdcpnModellingSkill from "@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md"; +import { useBrunchAgent } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent/flue"; + +import { PETRINAUT_HOST_INSTRUCTIONS } from "./host-instructions.ts"; import { ping } from "./tools/ping.ts"; import { readPetrinautDoc } from "./tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts"; @@ -24,45 +27,19 @@ export const RUNBOOK_SKILL_NAME = sdcpnModellingSkill.name; export const ACTIVATE_SKILL_TOOL_NAME = "activate_skill"; -export const chatAgentInitialDataSchema = v.optional( - v.object({ - mode: v.literal(VALIDATED_CONSTRUCTION_MODE), - }), -); - -export type ChatAgentInitialData = v.InferOutput< - typeof chatAgentInitialDataSchema ->; - export function ChatAgent() { - const initialData = useInitialData(); - useModel(`anthropic/${CHAT_MODEL_ID}`); - useSkill(sdcpnModellingSkill); + const coreSystemPrompt = useBrunchAgent(`anthropic/${CHAT_MODEL_ID}`); + useSdcpnPlugin(sdcpnModellingSkill); + + useInstruction(PETRINAUT_HOST_INSTRUCTIONS); useTool(ping); useTool(readPetrinautDoc); - if (initialData?.mode === VALIDATED_CONSTRUCTION_MODE) { - for (const constructionTool of petrinautConstructionTools) { - useTool(constructionTool); - } - } - const instructions = [ - "You are the Brunch modelling assistant inside the Petrinaut editor.", - `Activate the \`${RUNBOOK_SKILL_NAME}\` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.`, - "The Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.", - "Call ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.", - "When the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.", - "A client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.", - ]; - if (initialData?.mode === VALIDATED_CONSTRUCTION_MODE) { - instructions.push( - "This is a construct-only headless conversation. Use only the supplied runbook IR as modelling input, do not interview, and build the net through the mounted Petrinaut tools instead of emitting net JSON.", - ); - } - return instructions.join("\n"); + + return coreSystemPrompt; } /** * Pinned, and never to be edited: conversation storage keys on this literal. */ ChatAgent.agentName = "brunch-chat-agent"; -ChatAgent.initialData = chatAgentInitialDataSchema; +ChatAgent.initialData = sdcpnInitialDataSchema; diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/host-instructions.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/host-instructions.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3c13b949f77 --- /dev/null +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/host-instructions.ts @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +/** Petrinaut-host and AI SDK resume conventions appended after package instructions. */ +export const PETRINAUT_HOST_INSTRUCTIONS = [ + "Call ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.", + "When the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.", + "A client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.", +].join("\n"); diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/client-tools.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/client-tools.ts index f5b853f0796..3ab77dc3173 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/client-tools.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/client-tools.ts @@ -1,10 +1,11 @@ /** Flue-side client-tool signal contract: awaiting sentinel, result signal, tool names. */ +import { AWAITING_CLIENT } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent/client-tools"; import { readPetrinautDocToolName } from "@hashintel/petrinaut-core/ai"; -export const CLIENT_TOOL_RESULT_SIGNAL = "client-tool-result"; +export { AWAITING_CLIENT }; -export const AWAITING_CLIENT = "client" as const; +export const CLIENT_TOOL_RESULT_SIGNAL = "client-tool-result"; export const clientToolNames: ReadonlySet = new Set([ readPetrinautDocToolName, diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/construction-run.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/construction-run.ts index c9ca3f373b5..eeca24b4f76 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/construction-run.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/construction-run.ts @@ -16,7 +16,8 @@ import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url"; import { observe } from "@flue/runtime"; import { createFlueClient } from "@flue/sdk"; -import { VALIDATED_CONSTRUCTION_MODE } from "../../agents/chat-agent/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts"; +import { VALIDATED_CONSTRUCTION_MODE } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn/flue"; + import { CLIENT_TOOL_RESULT_SIGNAL, isAwaitingClient, diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts index 471a936f7a6..0d013472419 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts @@ -94,13 +94,23 @@ if (outputDirectory === defaultOutputDirectory && !usesFrozenV1Configuration) { const instrumentFiles = [ "apps/brunch-agent/package.json", "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/host-instructions.ts", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/ping.ts", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts", "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/artifacts.ts", "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts", - "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md", - "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/elicitation.md", - "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/ir-template.md", - "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md", - "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/package.json", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/system-prompt.ts", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/package.json", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/system-instructions.ts", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/elicitation.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/ir-template.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/opening-message.md", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/situation-pack.md", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/vestera-scheduling/truth-ledger-v1-prospective.yaml", diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/headless-petrinaut-client.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/headless-petrinaut-client.ts index 54a3f7dda24..54cce1b64ee 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/headless-petrinaut-client.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/headless-petrinaut-client.ts @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +import { + PETRINAUT_CONSTRUCTION_TOOL_NAMES, + type PetrinautConstructionToolName, +} from "@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn/flue"; import { createJsonDocHandle, createPetrinaut, @@ -8,11 +12,6 @@ import { getLatestNetDefinitionToolName, } from "@hashintel/petrinaut-core/ai"; -import { - PETRINAUT_CONSTRUCTION_TOOL_NAMES, - type PetrinautConstructionToolName, -} from "../../agents/chat-agent/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts"; - import type { Petrinaut } from "@hashintel/petrinaut-core"; export interface HeadlessPetrinautToolCall { diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/architecture/boundaries.integration.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/architecture/boundaries.integration.ts index 76d2921e820..84dbe327af0 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/architecture/boundaries.integration.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/architecture/boundaries.integration.ts @@ -34,8 +34,9 @@ import { const PACKAGES = workspacePackages(); const CORE = "@hashintel/brunch-agent"; -/** Any substrate package. The harness may never name one; a binding must. */ +/** Flue is the selected agent runtime; lower-level Pi packages remain binding/test concerns. */ const SUBSTRATE_SCOPES = ["@flue/", "@earendil-works/"]; +const FLUE_RUNTIME = "@flue/runtime"; const isSubstrate = (name: string): boolean => SUBSTRATE_SCOPES.some((scope) => name.startsWith(scope)); @@ -116,18 +117,20 @@ describe("role prefixes name what a package is architecturally (spec §12.2)", ( }); }); -describe("dependency direction (spec §4, §12.2)", () => { - test("the harness imports no substrate", () => { +describe("dependency direction", () => { + test("core's only agent-runtime dependency is Flue", () => { const core = PACKAGES.find((pkg) => pkg.name === CORE); expect(core).toBeDefined(); - expect(allDependencies(core!).filter(isSubstrate)).toEqual([]); + expect(allDependencies(core!).filter(isSubstrate)).toEqual([FLUE_RUNTIME]); for (const file of sourceFiles(core!)) { - const substrateImports = importedPackages(file).filter((s) => - isSubstrate(packageOf(s)), + const substrateImports = importedPackages(file).filter((specifier) => + isSubstrate(packageOf(specifier)), ); expect({ file: file.relPath, substrateImports }).toEqual({ file: file.relPath, - substrateImports: [], + substrateImports: file.relPath.endsWith("/src/agent/index.ts") + ? [FLUE_RUNTIME] + : [], }); } }); @@ -141,7 +144,7 @@ describe("dependency direction (spec §4, §12.2)", () => { } }); - test("plugins resolve core only — never the binding, never Flue", () => { + test("plugins depend inward on core and may contribute through Flue directly", () => { const plugins = byRole("plugin"); expect(plugins.length).toBeGreaterThan(0); for (const plugin of plugins) { @@ -149,12 +152,17 @@ describe("dependency direction (spec §4, §12.2)", () => { dependency.startsWith("@hashintel/brunch-agent"), ); expect(workspaceDeps).toEqual([CORE]); - expect(allDependencies(plugin).filter(isSubstrate)).toEqual([]); + expect( + allDependencies(plugin).filter( + (dependency) => + isSubstrate(dependency) && dependency !== FLUE_RUNTIME, + ), + ).toEqual([]); for (const file of sourceFiles(plugin)) { for (const specifier of importedPackages(file)) { const pkg = packageOf(specifier); - expect(isSubstrate(pkg)).toBe(false); + expect(isSubstrate(pkg) && pkg !== FLUE_RUNTIME).toBe(false); expect(pkg.startsWith("@hashintel/brunch-agent") ? pkg : CORE).toBe( CORE, ); @@ -423,12 +431,13 @@ describe("recorded Flue constraints hold by construction (spec §10)", () => { }); }); -describe("core auxiliary subpaths stay in their assigned lanes (spec §12.2)", () => { - test("core exposes browser contracts, prompts, storage support and testing as explicit subpaths", () => { +describe("core auxiliary subpaths stay in their assigned lanes", () => { + test("core exposes Flue composition, browser contracts, prompts, storage support and testing as explicit subpaths", () => { const core = PACKAGES.find((pkg) => pkg.name === CORE)!; expect(Object.keys(core.manifest.exports ?? {})).toEqual([ ".", "./client-tools", + "./flue", "./prompts", "./storage", "./testing", diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts index 2d087bb50d4..9b6e78e5bee 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts @@ -13,6 +13,10 @@ import { import { setProvider } from "@flue/runtime"; import { createFlueClient, FlueApiError } from "@flue/sdk"; +import { SDCPN_SYSTEM_INSTRUCTIONS } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn/flue"; +import { BRUNCH_CORE_SYSTEM_PROMPT } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent/flue"; + +import { PETRINAUT_HOST_INSTRUCTIONS } from "../src/agents/chat-agent/host-instructions.ts"; import { PING_TOOL_NAME } from "../src/agents/chat-agent/tools/ping.ts"; import { READ_PETRINAUT_DOC_TOOL_NAME } from "../src/agents/chat-agent/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts"; import { applyCaptureSweep } from "../src/capture/apply-sweep.ts"; @@ -131,17 +135,31 @@ try { }; faux.setResponses([ - fauxAssistantMessage( - [ - fauxThinking("Load the modelling runbook skill."), - fauxToolCall( - ACTIVATE_SKILL_TOOL_NAME, - { name: RUNBOOK_SKILL_NAME }, - { id: "tool-skill-1" }, - ), - ], - { stopReason: "toolUse" }, - ), + (context) => { + const request = JSON.stringify(context); + for (const instruction of [ + BRUNCH_CORE_SYSTEM_PROMPT, + ...SDCPN_SYSTEM_INSTRUCTIONS.split("\n"), + ...PETRINAUT_HOST_INSTRUCTIONS.split("\n"), + ]) { + if (!request.includes(instruction)) { + throw new Error( + `Model request omitted instruction: ${instruction}`, + ); + } + } + return fauxAssistantMessage( + [ + fauxThinking("Load the modelling runbook skill."), + fauxToolCall( + ACTIVATE_SKILL_TOOL_NAME, + { name: RUNBOOK_SKILL_NAME }, + { id: "tool-skill-1" }, + ), + ], + { stopReason: "toolUse" }, + ); + }, (context) => fauxAssistantMessage( [ diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation.test.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation.test.ts index 2230d9835d4..2207039ba95 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation.test.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation.test.ts @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ test("the prospective runner records a recoverable IR without construction or ca "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/opening-message.md", ); expect(record.instrument.fileSha256).toHaveProperty( - "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md", ); expect(record.finalizationMessage).toContain("not expert evidence"); } finally { diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-headless.integration.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-headless.integration.ts index 4422327105b..e9765cda92f 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-headless.integration.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-headless.integration.ts @@ -12,7 +12,8 @@ import { import { setProvider } from "@flue/runtime"; import { createFlueClient } from "@flue/sdk"; -import { VALIDATED_CONSTRUCTION_MODE } from "../src/agents/chat-agent/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts"; +import { VALIDATED_CONSTRUCTION_MODE } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn/flue"; + import { CLIENT_TOOL_RESULT_SIGNAL, isAwaitingClient, diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/AGENTS.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/AGENTS.md index e09a70a9a67..e35903393b9 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/AGENTS.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/AGENTS.md @@ -132,10 +132,7 @@ on it, same as an ADR. - **Linear and GitHub writing:** follow [`docs/agents/issue-writing.md`](docs/agents/issue-writing.md) whenever creating or editing an issue, pull request, or comment. -- **Topology gates** (enforced by tests): plugins never import - `@hashintel/brunch-agent/prompts`; transport packages never depend on a binding; bindings - depend inward on core; plugins depend only on core. Evaluation answer keys stay on the - evaluation side, never inside interviewee or elicitor inputs. +- **Topology gates** (enforced by tests): core and plugins may expose Flue-native production resources through dedicated `./flue` subpaths; plugins depend inward on core, never bindings, and never import `@hashintel/brunch-agent/prompts`; transport packages never depend on a binding; bindings translate generalized capture machinery into the selected substrate. Evaluation answer keys stay on the evaluation side, never inside interviewee or elicitor inputs. - **Posture:** prototype · stakes high — persisted capture data and merge gates must fail loudly, never corrupt silently · horizon: current milestone. - **Flue:** when adding state, a loop, a route, or a test harness, consult diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md index 8e80b7db951..51d6de3ccbd 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md @@ -6,6 +6,10 @@ Live. This file is execution authority for [FE-1563](https://linear.app/hash/iss Later projection, provenance, bounded revision, observer, host-continuity, and optimisation concerns remain in [`MISSION.next.md`](MISSION.next.md). They are not implementation authority here. +### Accepted design decision — Flue-native package ownership + +**Observed strain:** the app-local `ChatAgent` mixed the core Brunch prompt, SDCPN steering and runbook resources, SDCPN construction tools, Petrinaut host tools, and transport conventions, making none of their package authorities visible. **Local obligation:** follow Flue's native distinction between the agent's returned core instructions, `useInstruction` contributions, progressively disclosed `useSkill` resources, and `useTool` capabilities while exposing core and SDCPN ownership directly. **Alternatives:** preserving a substrate-neutral core would have kept agent composition in `binding-flue`, contrary to the intended split; making core and plugin Flue-native keeps the app as the required directive-marked registration and host composition point. **Owner acceptance:** the owner explicitly selected the Flue-native core/plugin alternative before implementation. This decision relocates the existing instrument without changing its runbook semantics and does not reactivate the generalized repertoire/`useElicitation()` runtime. + ## Imperative Manually reshape the technically viable Mission 3 elicitation runbook and Markdown workpiece into a stronger, research-informed candidate that the owner understands and endorses one consequential decision at a time. @@ -16,7 +20,7 @@ This is not an autonomous rewrite and not a statistical claim of universal super ## Throughline -One stepwise redesign through the existing production package: +One stepwise redesign through the production core-agent and SDCPN-plugin package seam: ```text research synthesis + historical workpieces + current authored resources @@ -31,7 +35,7 @@ research synthesis + historical workpieces + current authored resources → compare candidate evidence with Mission 3's frozen control ``` -The likely edit surface is the existing SDCPN-modelling skill: `SKILL.md`, `elicitation.md`, `ir-template.md`, and only the construction/check material whose phase ownership is directly implicated. Amend the structural-typing specification only when an accepted redesign decision contradicts it. Keep changes reviewable in small semantic steps rather than replacing the package wholesale. +The semantic edit surface is the SDCPN plugin's existing modelling skill: `SKILL.md`, `elicitation.md`, `ir-template.md`, and only the construction/check material whose phase ownership is directly implicated. Brunch core owns the stable Flue agent prompt; plugin-sdcpn owns its additional prompt material, runbook skill, and target-specific tools; the app owns only the directive-marked registration point and Petrinaut host composition. Amend the structural-typing specification only when an accepted redesign decision contradicts it. Keep changes reviewable in small semantic steps rather than replacing the package wholesale. The baseline is available as a comparison input, not a design prescription. Its observed range and dispositions must be considered before the candidate instrument is frozen or any improvement claim is made. Candidate runs use a new versioned protocol/output location and preserve their own instrument manifest; they never write into or modify the baseline campaign. @@ -58,8 +62,8 @@ Prefer one coherent candidate and a discriminating comparison over many lightly - The owner leads semantic and editorial choices. The agent presents alternatives, traces consequences, edits accepted decisions, and runs probes; it does not infer approval or silently choose the final package. - Work one observed strain or owner-supplied edge at a time. Prefer subtraction, relocation, and clearer authority before adding another catalog, abstraction, or artifact. - Keep universal elicitation, SDCPN investigation, workpiece structure, and PN construction distinct enough that each can change without turning questions into schema slots. -- Preserve one model-facing agent, one runbook skill, Flue's native `useSkill` and resource disclosure, and the production `ChatAgent` door. Do not add a loader, workflow engine, second agent, or TUI. -- Do not add a comprehensive ontology, closed claim kinds, typed completion algebra, plugin/repertoire runtime, observer fold, projection engine, capture-store join, or live Petrinaut mutation path. +- Preserve one model-facing agent, one runbook skill, Flue's native returned instructions, `useInstruction`, `useSkill`, `useTool`, resource disclosure, and the production `ChatAgent` door. Do not add a loader, workflow engine, second agent, or TUI. +- Do not add a comprehensive ontology, closed claim kinds, typed completion algebra, generalized plugin/repertoire runtime, observer fold, projection engine, capture-store join, or live Petrinaut mutation path. The statically composed Flue-native core and SDCPN package contributions are the production path, not a reactivation of generalized `useElicitation()`. - Preserve exact expert evidence and honest authorship. Normalized prose, agent assumptions, unasked material, and explicit user unknowns remain distinguishable. - Do not tune reusable guidance only to Vestera. Scenario facts and owner examples may test the package but do not enter reusable teaching as universal facts. - Keep construction outside ordinary elicitation. Move construction-owned material only when the redesign can observe the effect; do not broaden into Mission 5's provider-schema problem. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/reference/architecture/topology.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/reference/architecture/topology.md index 8c492f1f15d..742de1f6d06 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/reference/architecture/topology.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/reference/architecture/topology.md @@ -5,7 +5,10 @@ ## Verification — the tree as it stands ```text -packages/core LANE 3 (harness; substrate-free) +packages/core CORE HARNESS + Flue-native agent contribution +├─ agent/ +│ ├─ system-prompt.ts ✓ stable Brunch system prompt +│ └─ index.ts ✓ `useModel` composition; owns no formalism-specific prompt, skill, or tool ├─ capture-store.ts ✓ the storage port's contract + pure command surface; owns envelope │ invariants. Never: substrate imports, IO, per-substrate shapes. ├─ session-log.ts ✓ substrate-neutral archive/version/anchoring rules; archive ordinals @@ -19,11 +22,11 @@ packages/core LANE 3 (harness; substrate-free) │ repertoire.yaml ✓ guarded `./prompts` subpath: validated harness-default teaching; │ binding/evaluation composition only, never a plugin import (ADR-0008) ├─ testing/ ✓ test utilities subpath (mirrors Flue's own store-contract pattern) -├─ ask-protocol.ts ✓ substrate-free ask/suspension mechanism: affordance minting, guard, -│ reply-binding signal, and instruction fragments (FE-1422). See N1. -└─ sweep-protocol.ts ✓ substrate-free settlement/sweep mechanism: trigger/high-water facts, - replayable settled range, repair continuation, quote-only extraction, - and affordance-bound accounting advisories (FE-1392). See N1. +├─ ask-protocol.ts ○ compiled generalized ask/suspension mechanism; currently not mounted +├─ sweep-protocol.ts ○ compiled generalized settlement/sweep mechanism; currently not mounted +└─ instructions.ts, + elicited-model.ts, + completion.ts ○ compiled typed elicitation/fold/completion path; currently not mounted packages/binding-flue LANE 2 (translate harness ↔ Flue dialect) ├─ capabilities.ts ✓ capability declaration — the binding's contract-of-record @@ -34,10 +37,9 @@ packages/binding-flue LANE 2 (translate harness ↔ Flue dialect) │ cannot inject pre-classified archive entries. ├─ capture-accounting.ts ✓ recovers active-session Flue ids from session-qualified archived │ evidence pointers; contains no accounting policy. -├─ index.ts ✓ useElicitation is Flue HOOK WIRING (useTool, usePersistentState, -│ useAgentStart/useAgentFinish, useDataWriter, harness.prompt, durable -│ step.do, ctx.append) and calls core's ask/sweep protocols (FE-1422/92). -│ Never: elicitation semantics, store rules, prompt content. +├─ index.ts ✓ active public history, reply-projection, and local-store adapters only +├─ suspended/typed-elicitation.ts ○ retained generalized `useElicitation` hook wiring; compiled +│ but neither exported nor mounted by the production agent └─ local-capture-store.ts ✓ versioned storage-port implementation (capture store + session-log archive, legacy provisioning, parse-on-read, tmp+rename, per-path queue). One per deploy target per binding. Never: business rules. @@ -49,19 +51,29 @@ packages/transport-aisdk UI REPLY WIRE (substrate-neutral) out-of-band. Never: binding/Flue imports, inference, conversation rendering, or diagnostics dispatched as user evidence. -packages/plugin-gherkin LANE 3 (target policy) +packages/plugin-gherkin TARGET POLICY └─ index.ts ✓ identity + one `statement-noted` ConditionStated verbatim floor; strict schema forbids parsed structure and silent hardening. - Never: harness mechanism, substrate imports, storage. + Never: harness mechanism or storage. + +packages/plugin-sdcpn TARGET POLICY + Flue-native production contribution +├─ index.ts, +│ plugin.yaml ○ generalized typed definition/proposal path; compiled and tested but +│ not imported by the production ChatAgent +├─ system-instructions.ts ✓ visible SDCPN always-on and construction-mode prompt material +├─ flue.ts ✓ SDCPN instruction, skill, and conditional tool mounts +├─ skills/sdcpn-modelling/ ✓ progressively disclosed lifecycle, elicitation, workpiece, +│ construction, and check material +└─ tools/petrinaut-construction.ts ✓ bounded, schema-validated SDCPN realization tools apps/brunch-agent LANE 1 SHELL + remote server (imported from apps/dev) ├─ src/app.ts, db.ts ✓ Flue convention authorities: one route map and one conversation adapter ├─ src/db-path.ts ✓ testable package-relative path policy kept at source root because the │ same relative URL must survive Flue's flattened `dist/` bundle ├─ src/agents/chat-agent/ -│ ├─ agent.ts ✓ sole directive-marked model-facing agent -│ ├─ skills/ ✓ agent-owned, progressively disclosed Mission 3 runbook experiment -│ └─ tools/ ✓ capabilities mounted only by that agent +│ ├─ agent.ts ✓ sole directive-marked registration and composition point: core prompt, +│ │ SDCPN plugin contribution, and Petrinaut host contribution +│ └─ tools/ ✓ app-only diagnostics and Petrinaut host capabilities ├─ src/http/ ✓ HTTP authority: assets, route names, ownership guard, local origins, │ and `/api/chat` composition ├─ src/conversation/ ✓ identity and projection authority: shared payload, client-tool signal, @@ -86,7 +98,7 @@ apps/brunch-agent LANE 1 SHELL + remote server (imported from a refusal), prompt content, and advisory semantics; `useElicitation` contributes only Flue projection, hooks, persistent-state, private-prompt, refresh, and durable-step wiring. A future `binding-pi` reuses both protocol modules. -- **N2 (plugin cells, repertoire, and the proving runbook; amended by ADR-0007, ADR-0008, and Mission 3).** Reusable plugin-owned policy lives in plugin packages, and harness-owned repertoire teaching lives in core behind `@hashintel/brunch-agent/prompts`; bindings and evaluation composition may import it, plugins may not. Mission 3 deliberately did not reactivate that runtime: its directly authored, single-consumer SDCPN runbook is agent-owned under `src/agents/chat-agent/skills/` while the structural-prose experiment remains proving. A second real consumer or a return to plugin composition must re-establish reusable ownership rather than copying the app skill. The committed YAML remains directly assertable outside the bundle. +- **N2 (plugin cells, repertoire, and the proving runbook; amended by ADR-0007, ADR-0008, Mission 3, and FE-1563).** Reusable plugin-owned policy lives in plugin packages, and harness-owned repertoire teaching lives in core behind `@hashintel/brunch-agent/prompts`; plugins may not import that guarded prompt data. FE-1563 established a separate Flue-native production seam: core's `./flue` subpath supplies the stable agent prompt, while plugin-sdcpn's `./flue` subpath and exported `SKILL.md` supply SDCPN prompt material, progressive teaching, and target-specific tools. This does not reactivate the generalized repertoire/`useElicitation()` runtime. The app retains only the directive-marked registration point and host-specific capabilities. The committed YAML remains directly assertable outside the bundle. - **N3 (application composition; amended by ADR-0004 / FE-1437).** There is no dedicated demo shell. The standalone `apps/dev` was imported as `apps/brunch-agent`, which owns the remote Brunch server, target gallery, and diagnostics. `apps/petrinaut-website` owns the user-facing diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/binding-flue/package.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/binding-flue/package.json index d7a4463edbb..ba3c44c71cd 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/binding-flue/package.json +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/binding-flue/package.json @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ "name": "@hashintel/brunch-agent-binding-flue", "version": "0.0.0-private", "private": true, - "description": "The Flue binding: implements the substrate-capability list and owns the storage-port implementation.", + "description": "Active Flue history, reply-projection, and local capture-store adapters; generalized typed elicitation remains suspended.", "license": "AGPL-3.0", "type": "module", "exports": { diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/binding-flue/src/index.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/binding-flue/src/index.ts index 4885df836ec..51365e67f81 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/binding-flue/src/index.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/binding-flue/src/index.ts @@ -1,76 +1,9 @@ /** - * `@hashintel/brunch-agent-binding-flue` — the Flue binding. - * - * One binding per substrate. It implements the substrate-capability list - * (spec §10), owns the local capture-store/session-log storage-port - * implementation (spec §9.6), and is the - * only shell allowed to know Flue's dialect: **the harness imports no - * substrate; a binding imports both** (spec §4). - * - * Every time mechanism wants to land in here, the second-binding test applies - * (spec §14.2): genuinely substrate-specific, or mechanism leaking into Flue's - * dialect? + * Active Flue adapters for conversation history, reply projection, and the + * local capture store. The generalized typed elicitation hook is retained + * under `suspended/` but deliberately absent from this public surface. */ -import { - useAgentFinish, - useAgentStart, - useDataWriter, - useDelivery, - usePersistentState, - useTool, -} from "@flue/runtime"; -import * as v from "valibot"; - -import { - ASK_TOOL_DESCRIPTION, - AskInput, - FreeTextAffordance, - SWEEP_RESULT_STATUSES, - advanceSweepHighWater, - askProtocolInstructionFragments, - buildCompletionCueSignal, - buildSettlementCheckSignal, - buildReplyBindingSignalPayload, - buildSweepExtractionPrompt, - buildSweepList, - buildSweepRepairSignal, - completionDemands, - computeUnaccountedAskAdvisories, - createSweepExtractionResultSchema, - createInitialSweepState, - decidePendingAffordance, - decideSettlementTrigger, - deriveCaptureStatus, - evaluateCompletion, - foldElicitedModel, - mintAskAffordance, - parseSweepState, - pendingSweepRepair, - renderInstructions, - reopenSweepAfterRefusal, - settlementProtocolInstructionFragments, - slotAssertionExtractionGuidance, - sweepableRange, - toolName, - type CaptureStore, - type CaptureStoreSnapshot, - type FreeTextAffordanceValue, - type Plugin, - type SweepState, -} from "@hashintel/brunch-agent"; -import { repertoire } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent/prompts"; - -import { capturedUserEntryIdsForSession } from "./capture-accounting"; -import { - projectFlueHistoryForSweep, - type FlueHistoryReader, -} from "./history-reader"; - -const SweepToolOutput = v.looseObject({ - status: v.picklist(SWEEP_RESULT_STATUSES), -}); - export { CAPABILITIES, type Capability, type Provision } from "./capabilities"; export { createFlueHistoryReader, @@ -83,232 +16,3 @@ export { type FlueReplyProjectorOptions, } from "./reply-projector"; export { createLocalCaptureStore } from "./local-capture-store"; - -export interface ElicitationSession { - readonly sessionId: string; - readonly captureStore: CaptureStore; - readonly historyReader: FlueHistoryReader; -} - -/** - * Mount the elicitation harness in a Flue agent. - * - * Flue has no ask-the-user primitive, so the harness owns the turn-suspension - * protocol: a `terminate: true` ask tool, the pending affordance in - * per-session state, and the answer arriving as a fresh dispatch (spec §7.4). - */ -export function useElicitation( - plugin: Plugin, - session: ElicitationSession, -): string { - const delivery = useDelivery(); - const [pending, setPending] = - usePersistentState( - "pendingAffordance", - null, - ); - const [storedSweepState, setSweepState] = usePersistentState( - "sweepHighWater", - createInitialSweepState(), - ); - let pendingAtFinish = pending; - let sweepState = parseSweepState(storedSweepState); - const extractionResult = createSweepExtractionResultSchema(plugin); - const { definition } = plugin; - // The fold and the completion cue know slot assertions; a definition whose - // proposals do not include them has a model the harness cannot yet fold. - const slotModel = - definition?.proposals.some((p) => p.type === "slot-asserted") === true - ? definition - : undefined; - const demands = - slotModel === undefined ? undefined : completionDemands(slotModel); - // Read-time derivation, never stored: fold the active captures, evaluate - // completion over the objective slices, and render the cue (ADR-0003, - // ADR-0006). Returned as a tool result so the model sees a harness fact - // without any state reaching the instructions. - const completionCue = (snapshot: CaptureStoreSnapshot) => { - if (slotModel === undefined || demands === undefined) return undefined; - const model = foldElicitedModel(snapshot, slotModel); - const report = evaluateCompletion(model, demands); - const sweepList = buildSweepList(model, report, slotModel.patterns); - return { - ...report, - unsatisfied: report.failures.length, - unmapped: model.unmapped, - cue: buildCompletionCueSignal(model, report, sweepList).body, - }; - }; - const writeAffordance = useDataWriter("affordance", { - schema: FreeTextAffordance, - }); - - useAgentStart((ctx) => { - if (delivery.kind !== "user" || pending === null) return; - - pendingAtFinish = null; - setPending(null); - ctx.append({ kind: "signal", ...buildReplyBindingSignalPayload(pending) }); - }); - - useTool({ - name: toolName("ask"), - description: ASK_TOOL_DESCRIPTION, - input: AskInput, - output: FreeTextAffordance, - run({ data, toolCallId }) { - const affordance = mintAskAffordance(data.question, toolCallId); - - setPending((current) => { - const decision = decidePendingAffordance(current, affordance); - if (!decision.ok) throw new Error(decision.reason); - pendingAtFinish = decision.pending; - return decision.pending; - }); - writeAffordance(affordance); - - return { output: affordance, terminate: true }; - }, - }); - - useTool({ - name: toolName("sweep"), - description: - "Apply or replay the settled conversation prefix. The harness privately extracts quote-anchored captures, refreshes durable history immediately before atomic application, and advances sweep state only on success.", - input: v.strictObject({}), - output: SweepToolOutput, - harness: true, - durable: true, - async run({ harness, signal, step }) { - const historyAtJudgment = await step.do("read-settled-range", async () => - projectFlueHistoryForSweep( - await session.historyReader.peek(session.sessionId), - ), - ); - const range = sweepableRange(historyAtJudgment); - const throughUserEntryId = range.at(-1)?.id; - if (!throughUserEntryId) { - return { output: { status: "no-settled-range" as const } }; - } - - const extraction = await step.do( - "extract-sweep-proposals", - async () => - ( - await harness.prompt( - buildSweepExtractionPrompt( - { - targetFormalism: plugin.targetFormalism, - proposalNames: plugin.proposalCatalog.map( - (proposal) => proposal.name, - ), - ...(slotModel === undefined - ? {} - : { guidance: slotAssertionExtractionGuidance(slotModel) }), - }, - range, - ), - { result: extractionResult, signal }, - ) - ).data, - ); - - // This read is intentionally adjacent to application: its binding-owned - // archive write makes every quote resolvable before the store sees it. - await step.do("refresh-history-before-apply", async () => - projectFlueHistoryForSweep( - await session.historyReader.read(session.sessionId), - ), - ); - const applied = await step.do("apply-sweep", () => - session.captureStore.execute( - { - type: "apply-sweep", - // The plugin schema narrows the existing envelope here; the store - // repeats envelope validation and owns anchoring at apply. - proposals: extraction.proposals, - }, - { sessionId: session.sessionId }, - ), - ); - if (!applied.ok) { - sweepState = reopenSweepAfterRefusal(sweepState); - setSweepState(sweepState); - return { - output: { status: "refused" as const, refusal: applied.refusal }, - }; - } - - sweepState = advanceSweepHighWater(sweepState, throughUserEntryId); - setSweepState(sweepState); - const accountedEntryIds = await capturedUserEntryIdsForSession( - session.captureStore, - applied.snapshot, - session.sessionId, - ); - const appliedCaptureIds = - "appliedCaptureIds" in applied.value - ? applied.value.appliedCaptureIds - : []; - const completion = - slotModel === undefined ? undefined : completionCue(applied.snapshot); - return { - output: { - status: "applied" as const, - appliedCaptureIds, - skippedDedupKeys: - "skippedDedupKeys" in applied.value - ? applied.value.skippedDedupKeys - : [], - advisories: [ - ...("advisories" in applied.value ? applied.value.advisories : []), - ...computeUnaccountedAskAdvisories(range, accountedEntryIds), - ], - captures: applied.snapshot.captures.map((capture) => - Object.assign({}, capture, { - status: deriveCaptureStatus(applied.snapshot, capture.id), - }), - ), - ...(completion === undefined ? {} : { completion }), - }, - }; - }, - }); - - useAgentFinish(async (ctx) => { - // useAgentFinish also fires on terminate:true asks. The callback's local - // view is updated by ask/reply callbacks in this render, so it observes the - // live slot rather than the render-time persistent-state snapshot. - if (pendingAtFinish !== null) return; - - const entries = projectFlueHistoryForSweep( - await session.historyReader.peek(session.sessionId), - ); - const repair = pendingSweepRepair(entries); - if (repair) { - ctx.append({ kind: "signal", ...buildSweepRepairSignal(repair) }); - return; - } - const decision = decideSettlementTrigger({ - entries, - state: sweepState, - pendingAffordance: false, - }); - if (decision.action !== "nudge") return; - - sweepState = decision.nextState; - setSweepState(sweepState); - ctx.append({ - kind: "signal", - ...buildSettlementCheckSignal(decision.tail), - }); - }); - - return [ - ...askProtocolInstructionFragments(plugin.targetFormalism), - ...settlementProtocolInstructionFragments(), - ...(definition === undefined - ? [] - : [renderInstructions(repertoire, definition)]), - ].join("\n\n"); -} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/binding-flue/src/suspended/typed-elicitation.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/binding-flue/src/suspended/typed-elicitation.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..efddd018d66 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/binding-flue/src/suspended/typed-elicitation.ts @@ -0,0 +1,294 @@ +/** + * Suspended generalized typed-elicitation hook. + * + * This remains compiled and testable as prior implementation evidence, but it + * is not exported by the binding and is not mounted by the production agent. + */ + +import { + useAgentFinish, + useAgentStart, + useDataWriter, + useDelivery, + usePersistentState, + useTool, +} from "@flue/runtime"; +import * as v from "valibot"; + +import { + ASK_TOOL_DESCRIPTION, + AskInput, + FreeTextAffordance, + SWEEP_RESULT_STATUSES, + advanceSweepHighWater, + askProtocolInstructionFragments, + buildCompletionCueSignal, + buildSettlementCheckSignal, + buildReplyBindingSignalPayload, + buildSweepExtractionPrompt, + buildSweepList, + buildSweepRepairSignal, + completionDemands, + computeUnaccountedAskAdvisories, + createSweepExtractionResultSchema, + createInitialSweepState, + decidePendingAffordance, + decideSettlementTrigger, + deriveCaptureStatus, + evaluateCompletion, + foldElicitedModel, + mintAskAffordance, + parseSweepState, + pendingSweepRepair, + renderInstructions, + reopenSweepAfterRefusal, + settlementProtocolInstructionFragments, + slotAssertionExtractionGuidance, + sweepableRange, + toolName, + type CaptureStore, + type CaptureStoreSnapshot, + type FreeTextAffordanceValue, + type Plugin, + type SweepState, +} from "@hashintel/brunch-agent"; +import { repertoire } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent/prompts"; + +import { capturedUserEntryIdsForSession } from "../capture-accounting"; +import { + projectFlueHistoryForSweep, + type FlueHistoryReader, +} from "../history-reader"; + +const SweepToolOutput = v.looseObject({ + status: v.picklist(SWEEP_RESULT_STATUSES), +}); + +export interface ElicitationSession { + readonly sessionId: string; + readonly captureStore: CaptureStore; + readonly historyReader: FlueHistoryReader; +} + +/** + * Mount the elicitation harness in a Flue agent. + * + * Flue has no ask-the-user primitive, so the harness owns the turn-suspension + * protocol: a `terminate: true` ask tool, the pending affordance in + * per-session state, and the answer arriving as a fresh dispatch (spec §7.4). + */ +export function useElicitation( + plugin: Plugin, + session: ElicitationSession, +): string { + const delivery = useDelivery(); + const [pending, setPending] = + usePersistentState( + "pendingAffordance", + null, + ); + const [storedSweepState, setSweepState] = usePersistentState( + "sweepHighWater", + createInitialSweepState(), + ); + let pendingAtFinish = pending; + let sweepState = parseSweepState(storedSweepState); + const extractionResult = createSweepExtractionResultSchema(plugin); + const { definition } = plugin; + // The fold and the completion cue know slot assertions; a definition whose + // proposals do not include them has a model the harness cannot yet fold. + const slotModel = + definition?.proposals.some((p) => p.type === "slot-asserted") === true + ? definition + : undefined; + const demands = + slotModel === undefined ? undefined : completionDemands(slotModel); + // Read-time derivation, never stored: fold the active captures, evaluate + // completion over the objective slices, and render the cue (ADR-0003, + // ADR-0006). Returned as a tool result so the model sees a harness fact + // without any state reaching the instructions. + const completionCue = (snapshot: CaptureStoreSnapshot) => { + if (slotModel === undefined || demands === undefined) return undefined; + const model = foldElicitedModel(snapshot, slotModel); + const report = evaluateCompletion(model, demands); + const sweepList = buildSweepList(model, report, slotModel.patterns); + return { + ...report, + unsatisfied: report.failures.length, + unmapped: model.unmapped, + cue: buildCompletionCueSignal(model, report, sweepList).body, + }; + }; + const writeAffordance = useDataWriter("affordance", { + schema: FreeTextAffordance, + }); + + useAgentStart((ctx) => { + if (delivery.kind !== "user" || pending === null) return; + + pendingAtFinish = null; + setPending(null); + ctx.append({ kind: "signal", ...buildReplyBindingSignalPayload(pending) }); + }); + + useTool({ + name: toolName("ask"), + description: ASK_TOOL_DESCRIPTION, + input: AskInput, + output: FreeTextAffordance, + run({ data, toolCallId }) { + const affordance = mintAskAffordance(data.question, toolCallId); + + setPending((current) => { + const decision = decidePendingAffordance(current, affordance); + if (!decision.ok) throw new Error(decision.reason); + pendingAtFinish = decision.pending; + return decision.pending; + }); + writeAffordance(affordance); + + return { output: affordance, terminate: true }; + }, + }); + + useTool({ + name: toolName("sweep"), + description: + "Apply or replay the settled conversation prefix. The harness privately extracts quote-anchored captures, refreshes durable history immediately before atomic application, and advances sweep state only on success.", + input: v.strictObject({}), + output: SweepToolOutput, + harness: true, + durable: true, + async run({ harness, signal, step }) { + const historyAtJudgment = await step.do("read-settled-range", async () => + projectFlueHistoryForSweep( + await session.historyReader.peek(session.sessionId), + ), + ); + const range = sweepableRange(historyAtJudgment); + const throughUserEntryId = range.at(-1)?.id; + if (!throughUserEntryId) { + return { output: { status: "no-settled-range" as const } }; + } + + const extraction = await step.do( + "extract-sweep-proposals", + async () => + ( + await harness.prompt( + buildSweepExtractionPrompt( + { + targetFormalism: plugin.targetFormalism, + proposalNames: plugin.proposalCatalog.map( + (proposal) => proposal.name, + ), + ...(slotModel === undefined + ? {} + : { guidance: slotAssertionExtractionGuidance(slotModel) }), + }, + range, + ), + { result: extractionResult, signal }, + ) + ).data, + ); + + // This read is intentionally adjacent to application: its binding-owned + // archive write makes every quote resolvable before the store sees it. + await step.do("refresh-history-before-apply", async () => + projectFlueHistoryForSweep( + await session.historyReader.read(session.sessionId), + ), + ); + const applied = await step.do("apply-sweep", () => + session.captureStore.execute( + { + type: "apply-sweep", + // The plugin schema narrows the existing envelope here; the store + // repeats envelope validation and owns anchoring at apply. + proposals: extraction.proposals, + }, + { sessionId: session.sessionId }, + ), + ); + if (!applied.ok) { + sweepState = reopenSweepAfterRefusal(sweepState); + setSweepState(sweepState); + return { + output: { status: "refused" as const, refusal: applied.refusal }, + }; + } + + sweepState = advanceSweepHighWater(sweepState, throughUserEntryId); + setSweepState(sweepState); + const accountedEntryIds = await capturedUserEntryIdsForSession( + session.captureStore, + applied.snapshot, + session.sessionId, + ); + const appliedCaptureIds = + "appliedCaptureIds" in applied.value + ? applied.value.appliedCaptureIds + : []; + const completion = + slotModel === undefined ? undefined : completionCue(applied.snapshot); + return { + output: { + status: "applied" as const, + appliedCaptureIds, + skippedDedupKeys: + "skippedDedupKeys" in applied.value + ? applied.value.skippedDedupKeys + : [], + advisories: [ + ...("advisories" in applied.value ? applied.value.advisories : []), + ...computeUnaccountedAskAdvisories(range, accountedEntryIds), + ], + captures: applied.snapshot.captures.map((capture) => + Object.assign({}, capture, { + status: deriveCaptureStatus(applied.snapshot, capture.id), + }), + ), + ...(completion === undefined ? {} : { completion }), + }, + }; + }, + }); + + useAgentFinish(async (ctx) => { + // useAgentFinish also fires on terminate:true asks. The callback's local + // view is updated by ask/reply callbacks in this render, so it observes the + // live slot rather than the render-time persistent-state snapshot. + if (pendingAtFinish !== null) return; + + const entries = projectFlueHistoryForSweep( + await session.historyReader.peek(session.sessionId), + ); + const repair = pendingSweepRepair(entries); + if (repair) { + ctx.append({ kind: "signal", ...buildSweepRepairSignal(repair) }); + return; + } + const decision = decideSettlementTrigger({ + entries, + state: sweepState, + pendingAffordance: false, + }); + if (decision.action !== "nudge") return; + + sweepState = decision.nextState; + setSweepState(sweepState); + ctx.append({ + kind: "signal", + ...buildSettlementCheckSignal(decision.tail), + }); + }); + + return [ + ...askProtocolInstructionFragments(plugin.targetFormalism), + ...settlementProtocolInstructionFragments(), + ...(definition === undefined + ? [] + : [renderInstructions(repertoire, definition)]), + ].join("\n\n"); +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/binding-flue/test/public-surface.test.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/binding-flue/test/public-surface.test.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fd87749085a --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/binding-flue/test/public-surface.test.ts @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +import { describe, expect, test } from "vitest"; + +import * as binding from "../src/index"; + +describe("the Flue binding public surface", () => { + test("keeps generalized typed elicitation suspended", () => { + expect(binding).not.toHaveProperty("useElicitation"); + expect(binding).toHaveProperty("createFlueHistoryReader"); + expect(binding).toHaveProperty("createLocalCaptureStore"); + }); +}); diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/.oxlintrc.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/.oxlintrc.json index 871350799af..c6e675617ad 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/.oxlintrc.json +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/.oxlintrc.json @@ -34,8 +34,8 @@ "message": "Brunch libraries must not depend on Petrinaut implementations." }, { - "group": ["@flue/*", "@earendil-works/*"], - "message": "The Brunch harness must remain substrate-independent." + "group": ["@earendil-works/*"], + "message": "Flue is Brunch's production runtime; lower-level Pi packages remain outside core." }, { "group": ["@hashintel/brunch-agent-*"], diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/package.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/package.json index bc69c0952bc..67d1ef3e4c8 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/package.json +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/package.json @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ "name": "@hashintel/brunch-agent", "version": "0.0.0-private", "private": true, - "description": "The harness: mechanism and orchestration. Its public export surface is the plugin SDK.", + "description": "The Brunch harness, plugin SDK, and Flue-native core agent contribution.", "license": "AGPL-3.0", "type": "module", "exports": { @@ -14,6 +14,10 @@ "types": "./src/client-tools.ts", "import": "./dist/client-tools.js" }, + "./flue": { + "types": "./src/agent/index.ts", + "import": "./dist/flue.js" + }, "./prompts": { "types": "./src/prompts.ts", "import": "./dist/prompts.js" @@ -37,6 +41,7 @@ "test:unit": "vitest run" }, "dependencies": { + "@flue/runtime": "2.0.3", "valibot": "1.4.2", "yaml": "2.9.0" }, diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3f99d83ee72 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +import { useModel } from "@flue/runtime"; + +import { BRUNCH_CORE_SYSTEM_PROMPT } from "./system-prompt"; + +export { BRUNCH_CORE_SYSTEM_PROMPT }; + +/** + * Mount the capabilities owned by Brunch core and return its system prompt. + * + * Core currently owns no model-facing skill or tool. Add one here only when it + * applies independently of the selected modelling formalism and host. + */ +export function useBrunchAgent(model: string): string { + useModel(model); + return BRUNCH_CORE_SYSTEM_PROMPT; +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/system-prompt.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/system-prompt.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..64c42a41464 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/system-prompt.ts @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +/** Stable instructions returned by every Brunch agent render. */ +export const BRUNCH_CORE_SYSTEM_PROMPT = + "You are the Brunch modelling assistant inside the Petrinaut editor."; diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/client-tools.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/client-tools.ts index b866300d288..7a095f438f7 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/client-tools.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/client-tools.ts @@ -13,6 +13,9 @@ export type { ToolName } from "./naming"; export const ASK_TOOL_NAME = toolName("ask"); export const SWEEP_TOOL_NAME = toolName("sweep"); +/** A Flue tool result that delegates execution to the connected client. */ +export const AWAITING_CLIENT = "client" as const; + export type BrunchAskInput = v.InferOutput; export type BrunchAskOutput = v.InferOutput; diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/index.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/index.ts index 113bb307682..4e63e235e59 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/index.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/index.ts @@ -5,9 +5,10 @@ * envelope, the issue queue, sweep bookkeeping. Its public export surface *is* * the plugin SDK (spec §12.2). * - * **The harness imports no substrate.** A binding imports both this package and - * its substrate; plugins resolve this package only. That direction is enforced - * mechanically — see `test/boundaries.test.ts` at the repo root. + * The substrate-neutral SDK remains on this main export. The `./flue` subpath + * owns the production agent-runtime contribution; plugins may likewise expose + * Flue-native resources while depending inward on this package. That direction + * is enforced mechanically in the architecture tests. */ export { diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/vite.config.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/vite.config.ts index c59aef178ec..e6af2fcd916 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/vite.config.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/vite.config.ts @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ export default defineConfig({ "client-tools": fileURLToPath( new URL("src/client-tools.ts", import.meta.url), ), + flue: fileURLToPath(new URL("src/agent/index.ts", import.meta.url)), index: fileURLToPath(new URL("src/index.ts", import.meta.url)), prompts: fileURLToPath(new URL("src/prompts.ts", import.meta.url)), storage: fileURLToPath(new URL("src/storage.ts", import.meta.url)), @@ -22,7 +23,7 @@ export default defineConfig({ formats: ["es"], }, rolldownOptions: { - external: [/^node:/u, "valibot"], + external: [/^node:/u, /^@flue\/runtime(?:\/.*)?$/u, "valibot"], }, sourcemap: true, }, diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/.oxlintrc.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/.oxlintrc.json index 0b4ce17b4f7..fdd30d06c70 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/.oxlintrc.json +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/.oxlintrc.json @@ -38,12 +38,12 @@ "message": "Brunch libraries must remain independent of unpublished HASH packages." }, { - "group": ["@hashintel/petrinaut/*", "@hashintel/petrinaut-*"], - "message": "Brunch libraries must not depend on Petrinaut implementations." + "group": ["@hashintel/petrinaut/*"], + "message": "Brunch libraries must not depend on Petrinaut implementations; plugin tools may consume published @hashintel/petrinaut-core contracts." }, { - "group": ["@flue/*", "@earendil-works/*"], - "message": "Brunch plugins must remain substrate-independent." + "group": ["@earendil-works/*"], + "message": "Flue is the plugin's production runtime; lower-level Pi packages remain outside the plugin." }, { "group": ["@hashintel/brunch-agent-*"], diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/package.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/package.json index 78489fed6e6..2bae7139230 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/package.json +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/package.json @@ -2,14 +2,19 @@ "name": "@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn", "version": "0.0.0-private", "private": true, - "description": "The SDCPN target formalism: the process-model plugin definition and its slot-assertion proposal type.", + "description": "The SDCPN target formalism: plugin definition, Flue instructions, runbook skill, and construction tools.", "license": "AGPL-3.0", "type": "module", "exports": { ".": { "types": "./src/index.ts", "import": "./dist/index.js" - } + }, + "./flue": { + "types": "./src/flue.ts", + "import": "./dist/flue.js" + }, + "./skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "./src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md" }, "scripts": { "build": "vite build", @@ -19,7 +24,9 @@ "test:unit": "vitest run" }, "dependencies": { + "@flue/runtime": "2.0.3", "@hashintel/brunch-agent": "workspace:*", + "@hashintel/petrinaut-core": "workspace:*", "valibot": "1.4.2" }, "devDependencies": { diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f2bd692d50d --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ +import { + type Skill, + useInitialData, + useInstruction, + useSkill, + useTool, +} from "@flue/runtime"; +import * as v from "valibot"; + +import { + SDCPN_CONSTRUCTION_INSTRUCTIONS, + SDCPN_SYSTEM_INSTRUCTIONS, +} from "./system-instructions"; +import { petrinautConstructionTools } from "./tools/petrinaut-construction"; + +export { + SDCPN_CONSTRUCTION_INSTRUCTIONS, + SDCPN_SYSTEM_INSTRUCTIONS, +} from "./system-instructions"; + +export const VALIDATED_CONSTRUCTION_MODE = "validated-construction"; + +export const sdcpnInitialDataSchema = v.optional( + v.object({ + mode: v.literal(VALIDATED_CONSTRUCTION_MODE), + }), +); + +export type SdcpnInitialData = v.InferOutput; + +/** Mount the prompt material, skill, and conditional tools owned by the SDCPN plugin. */ +export function useSdcpnPlugin(sdcpnModellingSkill: Skill): void { + const initialData = useInitialData(); + + useInstruction(SDCPN_SYSTEM_INSTRUCTIONS); + useSkill(sdcpnModellingSkill); + + if (initialData?.mode === VALIDATED_CONSTRUCTION_MODE) { + useInstruction(SDCPN_CONSTRUCTION_INSTRUCTIONS); + for (const constructionTool of petrinautConstructionTools) { + useTool(constructionTool); + } + } +} + +export { + PETRINAUT_CONSTRUCTION_TOOL_NAMES, + petrinautConstructionTools, + type PetrinautConstructionToolName, +} from "./tools/petrinaut-construction"; diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/index.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/index.ts index ab23c7a868e..b65cd862f88 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/index.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/index.ts @@ -9,9 +9,11 @@ * addressed to a kind, node, and slot the definition names. The definition * names no domain, and neither does this code. * - * **This package resolves `@hashintel/brunch-agent` and nothing else** — never the - * binding, never Flue, and it is storage-blind (spec §9.6). `project` and - * `validate` (ADR-0005) land with the realization slice. + * This substrate-neutral descriptor depends inward on `@hashintel/brunch-agent` + * and remains storage-blind. It is compiled and tested but not imported by the + * production ChatAgent. The package's `./flue` subpath separately owns its + * active prompt, skill, and tool contribution. `project` and `validate` + * (ADR-0005) land with the realization slice. */ import * as v from "valibot"; diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md similarity index 100% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md similarity index 100% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/elicitation.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/elicitation.md similarity index 100% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/elicitation.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/elicitation.md diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/ir-template.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/ir-template.md similarity index 100% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/ir-template.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/ir-template.md diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md similarity index 100% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/system-instructions.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/system-instructions.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..df53344331b --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/system-instructions.ts @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +/** SDCPN-specific material appended to the Brunch core system prompt. */ +export const SDCPN_SYSTEM_INSTRUCTIONS = [ + "Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.", + "The Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.", +].join("\n"); + +/** Additional SDCPN instructions for the evaluation-only construction mode. */ +export const SDCPN_CONSTRUCTION_INSTRUCTIONS = + "This is a construct-only headless conversation. Use only the supplied runbook IR as modelling input, do not interview, and build the net through the mounted Petrinaut tools instead of emitting net JSON."; diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts similarity index 94% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts index c04177c94e1..9f45f05ad1f 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts @@ -1,12 +1,9 @@ import { defineTool } from "@flue/runtime"; import * as v from "valibot"; +import { AWAITING_CLIENT } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent/client-tools"; import { petrinautAiTools } from "@hashintel/petrinaut-core/ai"; -import { AWAITING_CLIENT } from "../../../conversation/client-tools.ts"; - -export const VALIDATED_CONSTRUCTION_MODE = "validated-construction"; - export const PETRINAUT_CONSTRUCTION_TOOL_NAMES = [ "getLatestNetDefinition", "addType", diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-construction-tools.test.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/test/construction-tools.test.ts similarity index 97% rename from apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-construction-tools.test.ts rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/test/construction-tools.test.ts index b577637a4ca..1ca9cb0e53a 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-construction-tools.test.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/test/construction-tools.test.ts @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ import { petrinautAiTools } from "@hashintel/petrinaut-core/ai"; import { PETRINAUT_CONSTRUCTION_TOOL_NAMES, petrinautConstructionTools, -} from "../src/agents/chat-agent/tools/petrinaut-construction"; +} from "../src/tools/petrinaut-construction"; const toolByName = (toolName: string) => { const constructionTool = petrinautConstructionTools.find( diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/sdcpn-modelling-skill.test.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/test/sdcpn-modelling-skill.test.ts similarity index 96% rename from apps/brunch-agent/test/sdcpn-modelling-skill.test.ts rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/test/sdcpn-modelling-skill.test.ts index b2575c3de5c..224a52c4eaf 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/sdcpn-modelling-skill.test.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/test/sdcpn-modelling-skill.test.ts @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ import { readFileSync } from "node:fs"; import { describe, expect, test } from "vitest"; const skillDirectory = new URL( - "../src/agents/chat-agent/skills/sdcpn-modelling/", + "../src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/", import.meta.url, ); const resourceFiles = [ diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/vite.config.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/vite.config.ts index 62daeca5b55..059795dcdc1 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/vite.config.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/vite.config.ts @@ -7,12 +7,20 @@ const packageRoot = fileURLToPath(new URL(".", import.meta.url)); export default defineConfig({ build: { lib: { - entry: fileURLToPath(new URL("src/index.ts", import.meta.url)), - fileName: "index", + entry: { + flue: fileURLToPath(new URL("src/flue.ts", import.meta.url)), + index: fileURLToPath(new URL("src/index.ts", import.meta.url)), + }, + fileName: (_format, entryName) => `${entryName}.js`, formats: ["es"], }, rolldownOptions: { - external: [/^@hashintel\/brunch-agent(?:\/.*)?$/u, "valibot"], + external: [ + /^@flue\/runtime(?:\/.*)?$/u, + /^@hashintel\/brunch-agent(?:\/.*)?$/u, + /^@hashintel\/petrinaut-core(?:\/.*)?$/u, + "valibot", + ], }, sourcemap: true, }, diff --git a/yarn.lock b/yarn.lock index 44d722ef213..4ee22a5a7b0 100644 --- a/yarn.lock +++ b/yarn.lock @@ -440,7 +440,9 @@ __metadata: "@flue/runtime": "npm:2.0.3" "@flue/sdk": "npm:2.0.3" "@flue/vite": "npm:2.0.3" + "@hashintel/brunch-agent": "workspace:*" "@hashintel/brunch-agent-binding-flue": "workspace:*" + "@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn": "workspace:*" "@hashintel/brunch-agent-transport-aisdk": "workspace:*" "@hashintel/petrinaut-core": "workspace:*" "@opentelemetry/api": "npm:1.9.1" @@ -7419,11 +7421,13 @@ __metadata: languageName: unknown linkType: soft -"@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn@workspace:libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn": +"@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn@workspace:*, @hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn@workspace:libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn": version: 0.0.0-use.local resolution: "@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn@workspace:libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn" dependencies: + "@flue/runtime": "npm:2.0.3" "@hashintel/brunch-agent": "workspace:*" + "@hashintel/petrinaut-core": "workspace:*" "@types/node": "npm:22.18.13" "@typescript/native-preview": "npm:7.0.0-dev.20260511.1" oxlint: "npm:1.63.0" @@ -7454,6 +7458,7 @@ __metadata: resolution: "@hashintel/brunch-agent@workspace:libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core" dependencies: "@anthropic-ai/sdk": "npm:0.74.0" + "@flue/runtime": "npm:2.0.3" "@types/node": "npm:22.18.13" "@typescript/native-preview": "npm:7.0.0-dev.20260511.1" "@valibot/to-json-schema": "npm:1.7.1" From 3ada120f9d3d7f14069838a852a6494e281bf18b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 15:28:34 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 011/101] Inline short Flue prompt fragments --- .../src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts | 9 +++++++-- .../agents/chat-agent/host-instructions.ts | 6 ------ .../evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts | 3 --- .../test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts | 13 ++++++------ .../docs/reference/architecture/topology.md | 8 +++----- .../packages/core/src/agent/index.ts | 6 +----- .../packages/core/src/agent/system-prompt.ts | 3 --- .../packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts | 20 +++++++++---------- .../plugin-sdcpn/src/system-instructions.ts | 9 --------- 9 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/host-instructions.ts delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/system-prompt.ts delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/system-instructions.ts diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts index 240c0d5d7e1..56422a69037 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts @@ -16,7 +16,6 @@ import { import sdcpnModellingSkill from "@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md"; import { useBrunchAgent } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent/flue"; -import { PETRINAUT_HOST_INSTRUCTIONS } from "./host-instructions.ts"; import { ping } from "./tools/ping.ts"; import { readPetrinautDoc } from "./tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts"; @@ -31,7 +30,13 @@ export function ChatAgent() { const coreSystemPrompt = useBrunchAgent(`anthropic/${CHAT_MODEL_ID}`); useSdcpnPlugin(sdcpnModellingSkill); - useInstruction(PETRINAUT_HOST_INSTRUCTIONS); + useInstruction( + [ + "Call ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.", + "When the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.", + "A client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.", + ].join("\n"), + ); useTool(ping); useTool(readPetrinautDoc); diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/host-instructions.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/host-instructions.ts deleted file mode 100644 index 3c13b949f77..00000000000 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/host-instructions.ts +++ /dev/null @@ -1,6 +0,0 @@ -/** Petrinaut-host and AI SDK resume conventions appended after package instructions. */ -export const PETRINAUT_HOST_INSTRUCTIONS = [ - "Call ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.", - "When the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.", - "A client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.", -].join("\n"); diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts index 0d013472419..75ab987452a 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts @@ -94,17 +94,14 @@ if (outputDirectory === defaultOutputDirectory && !usesFrozenV1Configuration) { const instrumentFiles = [ "apps/brunch-agent/package.json", "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", - "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/host-instructions.ts", "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/ping.ts", "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts", "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/artifacts.ts", "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/package.json", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/system-prompt.ts", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/package.json", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/system-instructions.ts", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/elicitation.md", diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts index 9b6e78e5bee..92b592a8a6b 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts @@ -13,10 +13,6 @@ import { import { setProvider } from "@flue/runtime"; import { createFlueClient, FlueApiError } from "@flue/sdk"; -import { SDCPN_SYSTEM_INSTRUCTIONS } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn/flue"; -import { BRUNCH_CORE_SYSTEM_PROMPT } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent/flue"; - -import { PETRINAUT_HOST_INSTRUCTIONS } from "../src/agents/chat-agent/host-instructions.ts"; import { PING_TOOL_NAME } from "../src/agents/chat-agent/tools/ping.ts"; import { READ_PETRINAUT_DOC_TOOL_NAME } from "../src/agents/chat-agent/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts"; import { applyCaptureSweep } from "../src/capture/apply-sweep.ts"; @@ -138,9 +134,12 @@ try { (context) => { const request = JSON.stringify(context); for (const instruction of [ - BRUNCH_CORE_SYSTEM_PROMPT, - ...SDCPN_SYSTEM_INSTRUCTIONS.split("\n"), - ...PETRINAUT_HOST_INSTRUCTIONS.split("\n"), + "You are the Brunch modelling assistant inside the Petrinaut editor.", + "Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.", + "The Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.", + "Call ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.", + "When the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.", + "A client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.", ]) { if (!request.includes(instruction)) { throw new Error( diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/reference/architecture/topology.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/reference/architecture/topology.md index 742de1f6d06..744867f7472 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/reference/architecture/topology.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/reference/architecture/topology.md @@ -6,9 +6,8 @@ ```text packages/core CORE HARNESS + Flue-native agent contribution -├─ agent/ -│ ├─ system-prompt.ts ✓ stable Brunch system prompt -│ └─ index.ts ✓ `useModel` composition; owns no formalism-specific prompt, skill, or tool +├─ agent/index.ts ✓ `useModel` plus the short stable Brunch system prompt inline; owns no +│ formalism-specific prompt, skill, or tool ├─ capture-store.ts ✓ the storage port's contract + pure command surface; owns envelope │ invariants. Never: substrate imports, IO, per-substrate shapes. ├─ session-log.ts ✓ substrate-neutral archive/version/anchoring rules; archive ordinals @@ -60,8 +59,7 @@ packages/plugin-sdcpn TARGET POLICY + Flue-native production contri ├─ index.ts, │ plugin.yaml ○ generalized typed definition/proposal path; compiled and tested but │ not imported by the production ChatAgent -├─ system-instructions.ts ✓ visible SDCPN always-on and construction-mode prompt material -├─ flue.ts ✓ SDCPN instruction, skill, and conditional tool mounts +├─ flue.ts ✓ SDCPN instructions inline with their skill and conditional tool mounts ├─ skills/sdcpn-modelling/ ✓ progressively disclosed lifecycle, elicitation, workpiece, │ construction, and check material └─ tools/petrinaut-construction.ts ✓ bounded, schema-validated SDCPN realization tools diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts index 3f99d83ee72..fe86ae288da 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts @@ -1,9 +1,5 @@ import { useModel } from "@flue/runtime"; -import { BRUNCH_CORE_SYSTEM_PROMPT } from "./system-prompt"; - -export { BRUNCH_CORE_SYSTEM_PROMPT }; - /** * Mount the capabilities owned by Brunch core and return its system prompt. * @@ -12,5 +8,5 @@ export { BRUNCH_CORE_SYSTEM_PROMPT }; */ export function useBrunchAgent(model: string): string { useModel(model); - return BRUNCH_CORE_SYSTEM_PROMPT; + return "You are the Brunch modelling assistant inside the Petrinaut editor."; } diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/system-prompt.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/system-prompt.ts deleted file mode 100644 index 64c42a41464..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/system-prompt.ts +++ /dev/null @@ -1,3 +0,0 @@ -/** Stable instructions returned by every Brunch agent render. */ -export const BRUNCH_CORE_SYSTEM_PROMPT = - "You are the Brunch modelling assistant inside the Petrinaut editor."; diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts index f2bd692d50d..3ac8de69ce8 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts @@ -7,17 +7,8 @@ import { } from "@flue/runtime"; import * as v from "valibot"; -import { - SDCPN_CONSTRUCTION_INSTRUCTIONS, - SDCPN_SYSTEM_INSTRUCTIONS, -} from "./system-instructions"; import { petrinautConstructionTools } from "./tools/petrinaut-construction"; -export { - SDCPN_CONSTRUCTION_INSTRUCTIONS, - SDCPN_SYSTEM_INSTRUCTIONS, -} from "./system-instructions"; - export const VALIDATED_CONSTRUCTION_MODE = "validated-construction"; export const sdcpnInitialDataSchema = v.optional( @@ -32,11 +23,18 @@ export type SdcpnInitialData = v.InferOutput; export function useSdcpnPlugin(sdcpnModellingSkill: Skill): void { const initialData = useInitialData(); - useInstruction(SDCPN_SYSTEM_INSTRUCTIONS); + useInstruction( + [ + "Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.", + "The Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.", + ].join("\n"), + ); useSkill(sdcpnModellingSkill); if (initialData?.mode === VALIDATED_CONSTRUCTION_MODE) { - useInstruction(SDCPN_CONSTRUCTION_INSTRUCTIONS); + useInstruction( + "This is a construct-only headless conversation. Use only the supplied runbook IR as modelling input, do not interview, and build the net through the mounted Petrinaut tools instead of emitting net JSON.", + ); for (const constructionTool of petrinautConstructionTools) { useTool(constructionTool); } diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/system-instructions.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/system-instructions.ts deleted file mode 100644 index df53344331b..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/system-instructions.ts +++ /dev/null @@ -1,9 +0,0 @@ -/** SDCPN-specific material appended to the Brunch core system prompt. */ -export const SDCPN_SYSTEM_INSTRUCTIONS = [ - "Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.", - "The Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.", -].join("\n"); - -/** Additional SDCPN instructions for the evaluation-only construction mode. */ -export const SDCPN_CONSTRUCTION_INSTRUCTIONS = - "This is a construct-only headless conversation. Use only the supplied runbook IR as modelling input, do not interview, and build the net through the mounted Petrinaut tools instead of emitting net JSON."; From 42a78c70303801dc8446f8727287c349006e0a6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 15:32:35 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 012/101] Format Flue instructions as template blocks Signed-off-by: Lu Nelson --- apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts | 10 +++++----- ...ic-elicitation-challenges-2026-08-06T10-02-41Z.md | 0 ...ntic-elicitation-criteria-2026-08-06T14-11-18Z.md | 0 .../brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts | 6 +++++- .../brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts | 12 +++++++----- 5 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/research/{ => elicitation}/agentic-elicitation-challenges-2026-08-06T10-02-41Z.md (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/research/{ => elicitation}/agentic-elicitation-criteria-2026-08-06T14-11-18Z.md (100%) diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts index 56422a69037..98704d8cdc1 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts @@ -31,11 +31,11 @@ export function ChatAgent() { useSdcpnPlugin(sdcpnModellingSkill); useInstruction( - [ - "Call ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.", - "When the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.", - "A client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.", - ].join("\n"), + ` +Call ping when you need to confirm the server tool path. +When the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc. +A client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user. +`.replace(/^\s+|\s+$/gu, ""), ); useTool(ping); useTool(readPetrinautDoc); diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/research/agentic-elicitation-challenges-2026-08-06T10-02-41Z.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/research/elicitation/agentic-elicitation-challenges-2026-08-06T10-02-41Z.md similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/research/agentic-elicitation-challenges-2026-08-06T10-02-41Z.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/research/elicitation/agentic-elicitation-challenges-2026-08-06T10-02-41Z.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/research/agentic-elicitation-criteria-2026-08-06T14-11-18Z.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/research/elicitation/agentic-elicitation-criteria-2026-08-06T14-11-18Z.md similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/research/agentic-elicitation-criteria-2026-08-06T14-11-18Z.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/research/elicitation/agentic-elicitation-criteria-2026-08-06T14-11-18Z.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts index fe86ae288da..35cea5f1aa9 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts @@ -8,5 +8,9 @@ import { useModel } from "@flue/runtime"; */ export function useBrunchAgent(model: string): string { useModel(model); - return "You are the Brunch modelling assistant inside the Petrinaut editor."; + return ` + + You are the Brunch modelling assistant inside the Petrinaut editor. + + `.replace(/^\s+|\s+$/gu, ""); } diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts index 3ac8de69ce8..b8e1ab44037 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts @@ -24,16 +24,18 @@ export function useSdcpnPlugin(sdcpnModellingSkill: Skill): void { const initialData = useInitialData(); useInstruction( - [ - "Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.", - "The Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.", - ].join("\n"), + ` +Activate the \`sdcpn-modelling\` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model. +The Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle. +`.replace(/^\s+|\s+$/gu, ""), ); useSkill(sdcpnModellingSkill); if (initialData?.mode === VALIDATED_CONSTRUCTION_MODE) { useInstruction( - "This is a construct-only headless conversation. Use only the supplied runbook IR as modelling input, do not interview, and build the net through the mounted Petrinaut tools instead of emitting net JSON.", + ` +This is a construct-only headless conversation. Use only the supplied runbook IR as modelling input, do not interview, and build the net through the mounted Petrinaut tools instead of emitting net JSON. +`.replace(/^\s+|\s+$/gu, ""), ); for (const constructionTool of petrinautConstructionTools) { useTool(constructionTool); From eb58763366ec841c4c825cc98f27026f67666310 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 16:10:40 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 013/101] Keep Brunch core context independent --- apps/brunch-agent/README.md | 2 +- apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts | 9 +++------ .../src/conversation/client-tools.ts | 4 ++-- .../src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts | 2 +- .../test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts | 6 ++++-- libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md | 2 +- .../docs/reference/architecture/topology.md | 16 +++++++++------- .../packages/core/src/agent/index.ts | 2 +- .../packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts | 8 ++++++++ .../src}/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts | 3 +-- 10 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) rename {apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent => libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src}/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts (91%) diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/README.md b/apps/brunch-agent/README.md index 049ca837c90..7732125b788 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/README.md +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/README.md @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ yarn dev:brunch The first step builds the Petrinaut libraries the panel imports (`dist/` and design-system codegen). Then it starts the Brunch server at `http://127.0.0.1:4321` and the real Petrinaut -website at `http://127.0.0.1:4915`. The website proxies `/api/chat` to Brunch. The panel talks to one Flue chat agent composed from the core prompt in `@hashintel/brunch-agent/flue`, the SDCPN instructions and modelling runbook skill in `@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn`, and app-owned Petrinaut host capabilities. The skill is activated via `activate_skill`, with supporting resources disclosed via `read_skill_resource`; app-owned tools are the server diagnostic `ping` and the existing Petrinaut `readPetrinautDoc` client tool. There is no generalized elicitation loop, sweep tool, or `brunch_ask` on this path. Capture is a harness-side pipe: an explicit settled range of Flue history is applied into a JSON store beside the conversation database, not by the interviewer. +website at `http://127.0.0.1:4915`. The website proxies `/api/chat` to Brunch. The panel talks to one Flue chat agent composed from the context-independent core prompt in `@hashintel/brunch-agent/flue`, the SDCPN/Petrinaut instructions, modelling runbook skill, and `readPetrinautDoc` client tool in `@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn`, and app-owned deployment/transport material. The skill is activated via `activate_skill`, with supporting resources disclosed via `read_skill_resource`; the app's only model-facing diagnostic tool is `ping`. There is no generalized elicitation loop, sweep tool, or `brunch_ask` on this path. Capture is a harness-side pipe: an explicit settled range of Flue history is applied into a JSON store beside the conversation database, not by the interviewer. A headless Mission 3 drive (simulated expert, same `ChatAgent` door): diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts index 98704d8cdc1..4620752c905 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts @@ -2,9 +2,9 @@ /** * Register and compose the Brunch agent for this Flue application. * - * Brunch core owns the stable agent prompt. The SDCPN plugin owns its prompt - * contribution, runbook skill, and construction tools. This application owns - * Petrinaut host tools and transport-specific instructions. + * Brunch core owns the context-independent agent prompt. The SDCPN plugin owns + * its Petrinaut-facing prompt, runbook skill, and tools. This application owns + * deployment diagnostics and transport-specific instructions. */ import { useInstruction, useTool } from "@flue/runtime"; @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ import sdcpnModellingSkill from "@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn/skills/sdc import { useBrunchAgent } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent/flue"; import { ping } from "./tools/ping.ts"; -import { readPetrinautDoc } from "./tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts"; export const CHAT_MODEL_ID = process.env["BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL"] || "claude-haiku-4-5"; @@ -33,12 +32,10 @@ export function ChatAgent() { useInstruction( ` Call ping when you need to confirm the server tool path. -When the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc. A client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user. `.replace(/^\s+|\s+$/gu, ""), ); useTool(ping); - useTool(readPetrinautDoc); return coreSystemPrompt; } diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/client-tools.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/client-tools.ts index 3ab77dc3173..2826f13f7f5 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/client-tools.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/client-tools.ts @@ -1,14 +1,14 @@ /** Flue-side client-tool signal contract: awaiting sentinel, result signal, tool names. */ +import { READ_PETRINAUT_DOC_TOOL_NAME } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn/flue"; import { AWAITING_CLIENT } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent/client-tools"; -import { readPetrinautDocToolName } from "@hashintel/petrinaut-core/ai"; export { AWAITING_CLIENT }; export const CLIENT_TOOL_RESULT_SIGNAL = "client-tool-result"; export const clientToolNames: ReadonlySet = new Set([ - readPetrinautDocToolName, + READ_PETRINAUT_DOC_TOOL_NAME, ]); const isRecord = (value: unknown): value is Record => diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts index 75ab987452a..35209db8ed6 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts @@ -95,7 +95,6 @@ const instrumentFiles = [ "apps/brunch-agent/package.json", "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/ping.ts", - "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts", "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/artifacts.ts", "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/package.json", @@ -103,6 +102,7 @@ const instrumentFiles = [ "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/package.json", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/elicitation.md", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/ir-template.md", diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts index 92b592a8a6b..7420f46569d 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts @@ -13,8 +13,9 @@ import { import { setProvider } from "@flue/runtime"; import { createFlueClient, FlueApiError } from "@flue/sdk"; +import { READ_PETRINAUT_DOC_TOOL_NAME } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn/flue"; + import { PING_TOOL_NAME } from "../src/agents/chat-agent/tools/ping.ts"; -import { READ_PETRINAUT_DOC_TOOL_NAME } from "../src/agents/chat-agent/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts"; import { applyCaptureSweep } from "../src/capture/apply-sweep.ts"; import { CLIENT_TOOL_RESULT_SIGNAL } from "../src/conversation/client-tools.ts"; import { @@ -134,7 +135,8 @@ try { (context) => { const request = JSON.stringify(context); for (const instruction of [ - "You are the Brunch modelling assistant inside the Petrinaut editor.", + "You are the Brunch elicitation assistant.", + "You are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.", "Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.", "The Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.", "Call ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.", diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md index 51d6de3ccbd..eb5dd568063 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Later projection, provenance, bounded revision, observer, host-continuity, and o ### Accepted design decision — Flue-native package ownership -**Observed strain:** the app-local `ChatAgent` mixed the core Brunch prompt, SDCPN steering and runbook resources, SDCPN construction tools, Petrinaut host tools, and transport conventions, making none of their package authorities visible. **Local obligation:** follow Flue's native distinction between the agent's returned core instructions, `useInstruction` contributions, progressively disclosed `useSkill` resources, and `useTool` capabilities while exposing core and SDCPN ownership directly. **Alternatives:** preserving a substrate-neutral core would have kept agent composition in `binding-flue`, contrary to the intended split; making core and plugin Flue-native keeps the app as the required directive-marked registration and host composition point. **Owner acceptance:** the owner explicitly selected the Flue-native core/plugin alternative before implementation. This decision relocates the existing instrument without changing its runbook semantics and does not reactivate the generalized repertoire/`useElicitation()` runtime. +**Observed strain:** the app-local `ChatAgent` mixed the core Brunch prompt, SDCPN steering and runbook resources, SDCPN construction tools, Petrinaut host tools, and transport conventions, making none of their package authorities visible. **Local obligation:** follow Flue's native distinction between the agent's returned core instructions, `useInstruction` contributions, progressively disclosed `useSkill` resources, and `useTool` capabilities while exposing core and SDCPN ownership directly. **Alternatives:** preserving a substrate-neutral core would have kept agent composition in `binding-flue`, contrary to the intended split; making core and plugin Flue-native keeps the app as the required directive-marked registration and host composition point. **Owner acceptance:** the owner explicitly selected the Flue-native core/plugin alternative before implementation, then clarified that core must remain deployable in any context and for any output formalism: SDCPN and Petrinaut model-facing identity, guidance, and tools belong to plugin-sdcpn, while browser execution and transport remain app-owned. This decision relocates the existing instrument without changing its runbook semantics and does not reactivate the generalized repertoire/`useElicitation()` runtime. ## Imperative diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/reference/architecture/topology.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/reference/architecture/topology.md index 744867f7472..4e3684d30a3 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/reference/architecture/topology.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/reference/architecture/topology.md @@ -6,8 +6,8 @@ ```text packages/core CORE HARNESS + Flue-native agent contribution -├─ agent/index.ts ✓ `useModel` plus the short stable Brunch system prompt inline; owns no -│ formalism-specific prompt, skill, or tool +├─ agent/index.ts ✓ `useModel` plus the context- and formalism-independent Brunch elicitation +│ identity; owns no editor-specific prompt, skill, or tool ├─ capture-store.ts ✓ the storage port's contract + pure command surface; owns envelope │ invariants. Never: substrate imports, IO, per-substrate shapes. ├─ session-log.ts ✓ substrate-neutral archive/version/anchoring rules; archive ordinals @@ -59,19 +59,21 @@ packages/plugin-sdcpn TARGET POLICY + Flue-native production contri ├─ index.ts, │ plugin.yaml ○ generalized typed definition/proposal path; compiled and tested but │ not imported by the production ChatAgent -├─ flue.ts ✓ SDCPN instructions inline with their skill and conditional tool mounts +├─ flue.ts ✓ SDCPN/Petrinaut instructions inline with skill and tool mounts ├─ skills/sdcpn-modelling/ ✓ progressively disclosed lifecycle, elicitation, workpiece, │ construction, and check material -└─ tools/petrinaut-construction.ts ✓ bounded, schema-validated SDCPN realization tools +└─ tools/ + ├─ petrinaut-construction.ts ✓ bounded, schema-validated SDCPN realization tools + └─ read-petrinaut-doc.ts ✓ Petrinaut editor guidance exposed as a client-executed tool apps/brunch-agent LANE 1 SHELL + remote server (imported from apps/dev) ├─ src/app.ts, db.ts ✓ Flue convention authorities: one route map and one conversation adapter ├─ src/db-path.ts ✓ testable package-relative path policy kept at source root because the │ same relative URL must survive Flue's flattened `dist/` bundle ├─ src/agents/chat-agent/ -│ ├─ agent.ts ✓ sole directive-marked registration and composition point: core prompt, -│ │ SDCPN plugin contribution, and Petrinaut host contribution -│ └─ tools/ ✓ app-only diagnostics and Petrinaut host capabilities +│ ├─ agent.ts ✓ sole directive-marked registration and composition point: generic core, +│ │ selected SDCPN/Petrinaut plugin, and deployment instructions +│ └─ tools/ping.ts ✓ app-only server-path diagnostic ├─ src/http/ ✓ HTTP authority: assets, route names, ownership guard, local origins, │ and `/api/chat` composition ├─ src/conversation/ ✓ identity and projection authority: shared payload, client-tool signal, diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts index 35cea5f1aa9..ab2f622f3b9 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ export function useBrunchAgent(model: string): string { useModel(model); return ` - You are the Brunch modelling assistant inside the Petrinaut editor. + You are the Brunch elicitation assistant. `.replace(/^\s+|\s+$/gu, ""); } diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts index b8e1ab44037..ccc5e6ad330 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts @@ -8,6 +8,10 @@ import { import * as v from "valibot"; import { petrinautConstructionTools } from "./tools/petrinaut-construction"; +import { + READ_PETRINAUT_DOC_TOOL_NAME, + readPetrinautDoc, +} from "./tools/read-petrinaut-doc"; export const VALIDATED_CONSTRUCTION_MODE = "validated-construction"; @@ -25,11 +29,14 @@ export function useSdcpnPlugin(sdcpnModellingSkill: Skill): void { useInstruction( ` +You are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor. Activate the \`sdcpn-modelling\` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model. The Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle. +When the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc. `.replace(/^\s+|\s+$/gu, ""), ); useSkill(sdcpnModellingSkill); + useTool(readPetrinautDoc); if (initialData?.mode === VALIDATED_CONSTRUCTION_MODE) { useInstruction( @@ -43,6 +50,7 @@ This is a construct-only headless conversation. Use only the supplied runbook IR } } +export { READ_PETRINAUT_DOC_TOOL_NAME, readPetrinautDoc }; export { PETRINAUT_CONSTRUCTION_TOOL_NAMES, petrinautConstructionTools, diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts similarity index 91% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts index 28e014c0cec..68dc902502b 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts @@ -1,13 +1,12 @@ import { defineTool } from "@flue/runtime"; import * as v from "valibot"; +import { AWAITING_CLIENT } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent/client-tools"; import { petrinautDocNames, readPetrinautDocToolName, } from "@hashintel/petrinaut-core/ai"; -import { AWAITING_CLIENT } from "../../../conversation/client-tools.ts"; - export const READ_PETRINAUT_DOC_TOOL_NAME = readPetrinautDocToolName; export const readPetrinautDoc = defineTool({ From c8ab012e1d7f234d2c97c8ee53d847f8fb67e365 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 16:16:28 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 014/101] Audit generic elicitor prompt material --- ...icitor-prompt-material-audit-2026-08-31.md | 172 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 172 insertions(+) create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/audits/core-elicitor-prompt-material-audit-2026-08-31.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/audits/core-elicitor-prompt-material-audit-2026-08-31.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/audits/core-elicitor-prompt-material-audit-2026-08-31.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f0729676a89 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/audits/core-elicitor-prompt-material-audit-2026-08-31.md @@ -0,0 +1,172 @@ +# Core elicitor prompt material audit + +**Date:** 2026-08-31 + +**Status:** Research and implementation audit for owner review. This compiles existing Brunch material for possible inclusion in the context- and formalism-independent core elicitor prompt. It does not amend the prompt, the runbook, or `MISSION.md`. + +## Question + +What has this project already said, taught, observed, or tested about conduct that should hold for a Brunch elicitor across domain contexts and output formalisms, and which part of that material is small and universal enough to remain in the always-on core system prompt rather than a progressively disclosed skill, plugin resource, workpiece contract, evaluator, or suspended mechanism? + +## Method + +The audit read all six current files under `docs/research/elicitation/`, the paired 2026-08-28 universal syntheses and their overview, current executable prompt/skill sources, the suspended repertoire renderer, frozen legacy and prospective prompts, mission/spec placement decisions, and evaluation evidence. Three isolated read-only inventories separately covered executable material, research, and historical prompt forms; they were used as completeness checks, not as independent evidence. + +## Verdict + +The current one-line prompt is correctly context-independent but under-specifies the stable conduct that the project repeatedly treats as universal. The corpus does not support copying the old repertoire or v0 prompt wholesale into the system prompt. It supports a concise always-on invariant set surrounded by progressively disclosed generic elicitation teaching. + +The strongest always-on candidates are: objective-relative attention; expert vocabulary rather than schema traversal; authorship and uncertainty preservation; no independent opening battery; divergence before reconciliation; and honest partial delivery rather than fluency-based completion. Detailed interviewing moves, quantitative scripts, lifecycle procedure, workpiece marks, target investigation, and detection signatures belong elsewhere. + +## Evidence discipline + +Repeated text is not independent corroboration when the active skill, repertoire, universal syntheses, and later specifications all descend from the same local source pool. Confidence rises where different evidence classes align: verified literature, observed Brunch runs, independently observed LLM-interviewer failures, and current executable teaching. Historical specifications and prompt variants show design lineage and candidate wording, not effectiveness by themselves. + +The corpus itself warns against prompt accretion: [`elicitation-to-ir-oracle-design.md`](../../specs/elicitation-to-ir-oracle-design.md) says not to paste source material wholesale into the system prompt or skill; [`structurally-typed-elicitation-runbooks.md`](../../specs/structurally-typed-elicitation-runbooks.md) says the always-on instruction is a concise router and invariant set, while bulky universal material remains lazy. + +## Source register + +| Source | What it contributes | Evidence status | Use in this audit | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | +| [`packages/core/src/repertoire.yaml`](../../../packages/core/src/repertoire.yaml) | The largest executable compilation of formalism- and domain-independent lenses, techniques, movements, licenses, smells, rabbit holes, failure modes, and lifecycle moves | Compiled teaching with per-entry provenance; suspended from production | Primary inventory of candidate generic conduct; too large and mechanism-coupled to use as an always-on prompt | +| [`packages/core/src/instructions.ts`](../../../packages/core/src/instructions.ts) | `HARNESS_PREAMBLE` and the renderer that combined repertoire with typed plugin definitions | Executable but suspended mechanism | Useful negative control: several sentences assert capture/fold/completion machinery the active agent does not have and therefore must not enter the current core prompt | +| [`plugin-sdcpn/.../elicitation.md`](../../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/elicitation.md) | A compressed active version of universal questioning, evidence, prioritization, stopping, caveats, and failure knowledge mixed with SDCPN investigation | Current production teaching; headings explicitly mark `universal`, `sdcpn`, and `mixed` provenance | Direct evidence that universal content is currently misplaced in the plugin; useful wording source, not the correct final home | +| [`universal-elicitation-synthesis.md`](../../archive/research/elicitation/2026-08-28-ensembles/universal-elicitation-synthesis.md) and its [independent companion](../../archive/research/elicitation/2026-08-28-ensembles/universal-elicitation-synthesis-cursor-2026-08-28.md) | Proposition-by-proposition source mapping, candidate homes, falsifying probes, current-material assessment, and unresolved tensions | Read-only syntheses over substantially shared local sources | Best existing placement analysis; agreement is editorial corroboration, not independent empirical evidence | +| [`elicitation-research-synthesis-2026-08-31.md`](../../research/elicitation/elicitation-research-synthesis-2026-08-31.md) | Cold-adjudicated synthesis across universal elicitation, SDCPN investigation, IR obligations, and capture/IR separation | Authoritative synthesis of the 2026-08-28 research batch | Current high-level evidence and uncertainty calibration | +| [`elicitation-strategy-literature.md`](../../research/elicitation/elicitation-strategy-literature.md) | Verified literature on objectives-first framing, concrete cases, probe depth, cue elicitation, quantities, disagreement, stopping, and technique selection | Mixed `[V]`, `[C]`, and `[R]` source grades, explicitly labelled | Main independent literature evidence; only `[V]` claims are treated as strong prompt candidates without further checking | +| [`interviewing-literature-source-catalog.md`](../../research/elicitation/interviewing-literature-source-catalog.md) | Verbatim instruments and frequencies: Bano/Ferrari mistakes, ambiguity cues, question typologies, completeness and stopping literature, and LLM interviewer findings | Source-preserving research report | Supplies exact failure observations and guards against over-compressed claims in later summaries | +| [`frontier-model-elicitor-failure-catalogue.md`](../../research/elicitation/frontier-model-elicitor-failure-catalogue.md) | FM-01–15 with mechanism, detection signature, accountable layer, and prevention status | Separates local observations, published observations, and synthesis | Prevents assigning machinery failures to prompt prose; identifies opening overload, ambiguity bypass, and unlicensed influence as technique-owned or partly technique-owned | +| [`evaluations/protocols/legacy-baseline/v0-prompt.md`](../../../evaluations/protocols/legacy-baseline/v0-prompt.md) | The first compact seven-move elicitor prompt: objectives first; slice then sweep; probe; ask absences; batch breadth/sequence depth; assumption ledger; end properly | Sealed historical evaluation instrument | Strong wording lineage and one observed intervention, but process-model categories and a full deliverable contract make it too target-specific and too large for core | +| [`harness-teaching-lineage-audit.md`](harness-teaching-lineage-audit.md) | Fifteen historical formulations of generic interviewer craft and their migration among plugin, harness, mechanism, and prompt layers | Historical audit | Establishes that generic ownership was repeatedly intended but never cleanly delivered; does not select final content | +| [`structurally-typed-elicitation-runbooks.md`](../../specs/structurally-typed-elicitation-runbooks.md) | Explicit Flue information hierarchy and the universal-repertoire versus target-runbook split | Historical specification, not live authority | Supplies the placement rule: concise always-on router/invariants; lifecycle in skill body; bulky teaching in resources | +| [`elicitation-to-ir-oracle-design.md`](../../specs/elicitation-to-ir-oracle-design.md) | Eight quality claims, hard-failure gates, mistake taxonomy, and source-to-home method | Evaluation design hypothesis with calibrated artifacts | Converts broad virtues into observable failures; most detection detail belongs in evaluation, not the prompt | +| [`vestera-legacy-baseline/readout.md`](../evaluations/vestera-legacy-baseline/readout.md) and [`vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md`](../evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md) | Observed failure and success ranges under different prompt/runbook conditions | Local run evidence; small samples | Grounds invention, hardening, stopping, opening-load, acquisition variability, and strong behavior to preserve without treating one run as representative | +| [`agentic-elicitation-challenges`](../../research/elicitation/agentic-elicitation-challenges-2026-08-06T10-02-41Z.md) and [`criteria`](../../research/elicitation/agentic-elicitation-criteria-2026-08-06T14-11-18Z.md) | The early interactive-compiler framing, semantic conservation, explicit transformation, controlled elicitation, and swappable targets | Imported design conversations | Useful conceptual sieve; not direct prompt copy and not independent research evidence | + +## Candidate material by placement + +### Always-on core system prompt + +These propositions are short, context-independent, relevant before any skill resource is read, and supported by either observed failure or multiple evidence classes. + +| Candidate invariant | Existing formulations | Evidence and confidence | Why always-on | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | +| **Context-independent elicitor identity** | Current core: “You are the Brunch elicitation assistant.” The v0 prompt used “expert process-model elicitor,” which is too narrow. | Product-policy decision; no empirical claim needed | Establishes role without selecting a domain, editor, workpiece, or formalism | +| **Purpose-relative attention** | Repertoire: “Objectives first” and “Depth is objective-relative.” Research synthesis: establish the decision, comparison, or worry, audience, boundary, horizon, and accuracy need. Literature: objectives determine responses, factors, scope, and detail. | Strong: verified simulation-modeling literature plus local stopping/acquisition failures; exact opening script remains unsettled | Every later question-selection and stopping judgment needs a purpose denominator; the detailed stance interview stays in the skill | +| **Expert vocabulary, not target-schema traversal** | Active skill: follow the expert’s thread; do not interview by workpiece headings. Oracle gate: schema-shaped interviewing. Mission 3 observed operational vocabulary without PN leakage. | Medium-high: design principle, evaluator gate, and local positive observation; no comparative proof that jargon always harms acquisition | It must constrain the first substantive question, before lazy teaching is available, and remains valid for every plugin | +| **Authorship and uncertainty remain distinct** | Repertoire and active skill: a value the expert did not give cannot appear as theirs; assumptions are stated as the agent’s with reason and check; tension is preserved. Challenges/criteria: semantic conservation and explicit transformation. | Strong: local invention/hardening failures, published LLM hallucination, and prospective evidence that explicit partials can remain cold-usable | This is the stable trust contract across every domain and target; detailed workpiece marks and capture machinery stay outside the prompt | +| **No independent opening battery** | Repertoire: opening battery is failure; active skill: batch two to four only under one frame. Universal synthesis: hard rule is no independent battery before the first answer; the numeric batching license is unearned. | Medium: two historical Mission 3 opening batteries and FM-12; no opening overload in either valid prospective run; literature supports one-question/depth but not one universal count | Placement, not just content, was observed to matter: lazy teaching arrived after the offending first turn. The exact post-opening batching policy belongs in the skill | +| **Divergence is information, not permission to reconcile** | Repertoire: two answers in tension; sources that disagree; consistency probe. Literature: ambiguity exposes tacit knowledge and disagreement must not be silently averaged. | Strong for preservation; medium for exact questioning cadence | The prohibition on silent reconciliation is universal and compact; detailed correction-versus-coexistence handling belongs in the skill/workpiece | +| **Completion is not fluency; stopping yields an honest partial** | Repertoire: “End properly,” “Honour a stop,” and “Name the stopping outcome.” Failure catalogue: premature accommodation, budget exhaustion, and fluent incompleteness. Research synthesis: stop on evidence-bearing criteria, not fluency, fatigue, turn count, or self-report. | Strong that false stop rules fail: local legacy failures plus independently published LLM early-stop and budget-exhaustion behavior. The active path lacks typed completion machinery. | A concise behavioral guard is honest; claiming that the harness computes completion would be false. Detailed close ritual and target sufficiency stay outside the prompt | + +### Core elicitation skill body or lazy resource + +These are generic, but too procedural, conditional, lengthy, or evidence-sensitive for the always-on prompt. + +- **Stance before structure:** purpose, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, time/appetite, and tolerance for proposed assumptions, sampled conversationally rather than administered as a form. +- **Concrete case before generalization:** a bounded three-to-six-step account, one remembered occasion from trigger to end, then one property across what that case revealed. +- **Deepening moves:** last-time probes; cue and observable follow-ups; no bare why as the primary probe; contrastive and expert–novice questions; anchored hypotheticals; change technique when yield drops. +- **Practice versus policy:** normative language and documents are claims to test against recent practice, not practiced facts. +- **Quantitative judgment:** determine whether typical or tail matters; use quantiles rather than min/mode/max; one incident is not a rate; use the clairvoyant test when definitions are unstable. Exact scripts should remain lazy and source-labelled. +- **Assumption and deferral licenses:** propose low-risk structure for correction only with agent authorship visible; defer only with what is missing, why, and where it would come from. +- **Divergence handling:** ask whether a later account is a correction or a context in which both apply; preserve unresolved alternatives and long-range contradictions. +- **Closing procedure:** summarize, name assumptions and consequential gaps, offer one correction opportunity, use a clearinghouse only as a cheap correction rather than coverage proof, and open no new topic after a stop. +- **Rare-event and taxonomy techniques:** premortem, CDM/ACTA probe families, laddering, card sorting, triadic comparison, exception sweeps, and tradeoff pairs. These are disclose-on-strain resources, not default prompt furniture. + +### Plugin-owned material + +- What kinds of things the selected formalism needs investigated and how to recognize them. +- Workpiece structure, emission/recovery convention, and target-specific sufficiency. +- SDCPN situation typologies, Petri-net mapping, Petrinaut construction/check behavior, and target projection loss. +- Any vocabulary such as place, transition, token, colour, firing, SDCPN, Petrinaut, runbook IR, or `runbook-ir` fence. + +### Evaluator- or machinery-owned material + +- Detection signatures, weighted score dimensions, hidden ledgers, mistake IDs, question counts, token/turn budgets, and comparative thresholds. +- Claims that captures, folds, completion demands, affected slices, provenance links, or projection loss reports are mechanically computed. The current production path does not provide those mechanisms. +- Stable identity, typed claim schemas, capture-store commands, observer folds, and plugin proposal contracts. +- Absolute completion claims. The verified literature supports purpose-relative sufficiency and explicit gaps, not knowable exhaustive completion. + +## Existing prompt forms and what they teach + +### The one-line current core + +Strength: correctly names no domain or output formalism after the latest ownership correction. Weakness: it gives the model no stable trust, attention, interaction-load, or stopping contract. All consequential conduct is currently contingent on plugin activation and resource reads. + +### The v0 prompt + +Strength: the clearest compact historical sequence and the origin of much current teaching. Weakness: it makes a seven-category process-model surface the completion checklist, mixes universal method with process-model content, and is large enough to encourage schema-shaped interviewing. Reuse its seven generic move headings as source material, not its complete system prompt. + +### The repertoire + +Strength: the richest provenance-bearing inventory, including licenses and anti-guidance lost from the active compression. Weakness: it is a catalogue, contains unresolved or one-run-vindicated choices, and was designed to be rendered with typed plugin/completion machinery. Use it to populate and test a core skill, not as one large prompt. + +### The active SDCPN elicitation resource + +Strength: a terse, field-usable compression that valid prospective runs used without hard failures. Weakness: it explicitly mixes universal and SDCPN material; universal rules arrive too late to constrain skill-activation turns; several rules are labels without triggers; acquisition varied materially across the two valid runs. + +### `HARNESS_PREAMBLE` + +Strength: compact statements of provenance and completion intent. Weakness: four of five sentences describe suspended capture/fold/completion/affected-slice behavior. Importing them would make the prompt lie about the active runtime. Only the non-invention distinction may be restated behaviorally, without machinery claims. + +### Condition 3 + +[`condition-3-prompt.md`](../../../evaluations/protocols/legacy-baseline/condition-3-prompt.md) combined the v0 identity with single-session controls, operator-supplied completion diagnostics, CPS cards, bounded batching, status/grade language, and respectful close. It was never run and was retired. Its close and evidence fragments remain candidates for progressive teaching; diagnostic coordinates and CPS cards are evaluation/plugin material. + +### Conditions 4 and 5 + +The exact [Condition 4 system prompt](../evaluations/vestera-legacy-baseline/transcripts/condition-4-system.md) rendered the complete repertoire and SDCPN plugin into one large text-only prompt. The exact [Condition 5 system prompt](../evaluations/vestera-legacy-baseline/transcripts/condition-5-system.md) added ask, settlement, capture/fold, and typed completion instructions. These are valuable archaeological snapshots and negative controls: adding comprehensive teaching and mechanism claims did not make them suitable always-on core prompts, and Condition 5 imposed minute-scale foreground work. + +### Frozen Mission 3 runbook + +The prospective v1 control at source commit `b738aa1be1a62a9f9cdde89ced78558f04293a77` is the exact predecessor of the current package-owned skill. It supplies no additional semantic source beyond the active files, but it is the immutable behavioral control against which prompt placement changes must be compared. + +### Stock Petrinaut prompt + +`libs/@hashintel/petrinaut-core/src/ai.ts` contains a separate active Petrinaut prompt with “interview first, build second,” grouped questions, process/timing/metrics/scenario coverage, tool policy, and an offer to “make it up/use sensible defaults.” It is useful as coverage evidence but not reusable Brunch policy: most of it is editor/formalism-specific, and invented defaults conflict with Brunch’s provenance contract. + +## Provisional compact compilation + +This is a candidate assembled from existing material, not a recommended edit yet. Each paragraph should be accepted, rejected, or relocated independently before implementation. + +```text +You are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make their knowledge explicit enough for the selected purpose and target without assuming a domain or output formalism. + +Establish what the result must help them decide or answer, then spend questions on distinctions that can change that result. + +When speaking with the person, use their vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time, and group questions only when they share one frame. + +Preserve authorship and uncertainty. Distinguish what the person said from your inference, assumption, unknown, ambiguity, conflict, correction, omission, or default. Never invent content, silently make a hedge more precise, or treat assent to your own wording as independent evidence. + +Treat tensions as information and ask before reconciling them. + +Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or a turn budget as completion. If the person stops, return the best useful partial result with consequential gaps and assumptions named. +``` + +## Conservative smaller candidate + +If the first prompt iteration should include only the highest-confidence trust and routing invariants, defer the disputed batching and fuller stopping language: + +```text +You are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make their knowledge explicit enough for the selected purpose and target without assuming a domain or output formalism. + +Establish what the result must help them decide or answer, and use their vocabulary rather than traversing a schema or target representation. + +Preserve authorship and uncertainty. Never invent content, silently harden an answer, reconcile conflicting accounts without asking, or present your own wording as the person’s evidence. + +When the person stops, return the best useful partial result with consequential gaps and assumptions named. +``` + +## Decisions still required before editing the core prompt + +1. Whether “selected purpose and target” is useful generic orientation or unnecessary abstraction in the identity paragraph. +2. Whether the observed first-turn placement failure justifies an always-on no-opening-battery sentence despite no opening-overload gate in the two valid prospective runs. +3. Whether core should say “one answerable thread at a time,” “one question at a time,” or only prohibit independent batteries; the `2–4` batching number is not independently established. +4. Whether the always-on epistemic list should name all distinctions or state the compact governing prohibition and leave the vocabulary to the core skill/workpiece. +5. Whether stopping language should name false stopping rules or only require honest partial delivery; core must not imply typed completion machinery that is suspended. +6. Whether “person,” “expert,” “user,” or “source” is the generic counterpart. The literature warns that domain experts may not be modelers, while Brunch may eventually elicit from non-expert stakeholders too. +7. Whether the core prompt should direct activation of a generic elicitation skill. Flue already presents mounted skill descriptions; plugin-specific skill names do not belong in core. + +## Recommended next move + +Review the conservative candidate one paragraph at a time against the decisions above. Then create a core elicitation skill from the generic teaching inventory before adding more detail to the always-on prompt. The first candidate evaluation should preserve the frozen baseline and separately test whether moving the no-opening-battery and epistemic invariants into the always-on tier changes first-turn load or evidence fidelity. From 70acc0d2575a39a195ed861905659a5c2d68a002 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 16:26:01 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 015/101] Load the Brunch system prompt from Markdown --- .../src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts | 1 + .../brunch-agent/docs/reference/architecture/topology.md | 4 ++-- libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md | 1 + .../brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts | 8 +++----- .../brunch-agent/packages/core/src/raw-imports.d.ts | 7 ++++++- 5 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts index 35209db8ed6..b9a2f4e48cf 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ const instrumentFiles = [ "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/artifacts.ts", "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/package.json", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/package.json", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts", diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/reference/architecture/topology.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/reference/architecture/topology.md index 4e3684d30a3..06e91862b3e 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/reference/architecture/topology.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/reference/architecture/topology.md @@ -6,8 +6,8 @@ ```text packages/core CORE HARNESS + Flue-native agent contribution -├─ agent/index.ts ✓ `useModel` plus the context- and formalism-independent Brunch elicitation -│ identity; owns no editor-specific prompt, skill, or tool +├─ SYSTEM.md ✓ authoritative context- and formalism-independent Brunch system prompt +├─ agent/index.ts ✓ `useModel` composition; owns no editor-specific prompt, skill, or tool ├─ capture-store.ts ✓ the storage port's contract + pure command surface; owns envelope │ invariants. Never: substrate imports, IO, per-substrate shapes. ├─ session-log.ts ✓ substrate-neutral archive/version/anchoring rules; archive ordinals diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fd9d181336f --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +You are the Brunch elicitation assistant. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts index ab2f622f3b9..cd4fbfe75fb 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@ import { useModel } from "@flue/runtime"; +import systemPrompt from "../SYSTEM.md?raw"; + /** * Mount the capabilities owned by Brunch core and return its system prompt. * @@ -8,9 +10,5 @@ import { useModel } from "@flue/runtime"; */ export function useBrunchAgent(model: string): string { useModel(model); - return ` - - You are the Brunch elicitation assistant. - - `.replace(/^\s+|\s+$/gu, ""); + return systemPrompt.replace(/^\s+|\s+$/gu, ""); } diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/raw-imports.d.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/raw-imports.d.ts index c24bf038f8c..e6cc5c7190a 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/raw-imports.d.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/raw-imports.d.ts @@ -1,4 +1,9 @@ -/** Vite's `?raw` import: the repertoire ships inside the bundle as a string. */ +/** Vite's `?raw` imports ship authored prompt material inside the bundle. */ +declare module "*.md?raw" { + const markdown: string; + export default markdown; +} + declare module "*.yaml?raw" { const yaml: string; export default yaml; From 96479d7ac762d79e95a5d1fa33a3289ba55170b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 16:27:13 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 016/101] Add a core prompt shaping workbench --- .../core/_drafts/system-prompt/README.md | 27 ++++++++++++ .../assemblies/01-conservative.md | 13 ++++++ .../system-prompt/assemblies/02-balanced.md | 17 ++++++++ .../assemblies/03-first-turn-guarded.md | 15 +++++++ .../assemblies/04-trust-contract-forward.md | 13 ++++++ .../exclusions-and-false-claims.md | 43 +++++++++++++++++++ .../sections/authorship-and-uncertainty.md | 29 +++++++++++++ .../sections/divergence-and-revision.md | 25 +++++++++++ .../sections/identity-and-scope.md | 21 +++++++++ .../sections/objective-and-attention.md | 21 +++++++++ .../system-prompt/sections/question-shape.md | 25 +++++++++++ .../system-prompt/sections/skill-routing.md | 21 +++++++++ .../sections/stopping-and-partial-delivery.md | 25 +++++++++++ .../sections/vocabulary-and-thread.md | 21 +++++++++ .../core/_drafts/system-prompt/source-map.md | 27 ++++++++++++ 15 files changed, 343 insertions(+) create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/README.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/assemblies/01-conservative.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/assemblies/02-balanced.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/assemblies/03-first-turn-guarded.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/assemblies/04-trust-contract-forward.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/exclusions-and-false-claims.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/authorship-and-uncertainty.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/divergence-and-revision.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/identity-and-scope.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/objective-and-attention.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/question-shape.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/skill-routing.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/stopping-and-partial-delivery.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/vocabulary-and-thread.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/source-map.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/README.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/README.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9c03a00928a --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +# Brunch core system-prompt workbench + +**Temporary, non-authoritative material.** The production prompt is [`../../src/SYSTEM.md`](../../src/SYSTEM.md). Nothing in this directory is imported or built. + +This workbench turns the [core elicitor prompt audit](../../../../docs/evidence/audits/core-elicitor-prompt-material-audit-2026-08-31.md) into text that can be manually cut, combined, shortened, or promoted into `SYSTEM.md`. It intentionally contains overlapping formulations. Similar wording here is a design comparison, not corroborating evidence. + +## Browse by use + +- `assemblies/` contains complete prompt candidates with different emphases. +- `sections/` contains interchangeable prompt modules, usually short / medium / strong variants. +- [`source-map.md`](source-map.md) maps modules back to repository evidence and open questions. +- [`exclusions-and-false-claims.md`](exclusions-and-false-claims.md) lists material that must not leak into a generic or truthful core prompt. + +## Suggested shaping workflow + +1. Choose an assembly closest to the desired register. +2. Replace individual paragraphs from the corresponding section files. +3. Remove repeated rules; one authoritative statement is better than several paraphrases. +4. Keep detailed interviewing techniques out of `SYSTEM.md`; they belong in a future generic elicitation skill. +5. Copy only accepted text into `src/SYSTEM.md`. +6. Delete this directory when the prompt is settled or freeze selected variants under a versioned evaluation protocol if they need comparative testing. + +## Stable versus unresolved + +Strongly supported: context-independent identity; purpose-relative attention; expert vocabulary; no invention or silent hardening; divergence before reconciliation; honest partial delivery. + +Still unresolved: one question versus a small shared-frame batch; how much orientation precedes the first case; whether skill activation belongs in core; how many epistemic distinctions to name always-on; how much stopping language belongs in the prompt rather than checks. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/assemblies/01-conservative.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/assemblies/01-conservative.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7326e5c06e5 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/assemblies/01-conservative.md @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +# Conservative assembly + +The smallest expansion that adds the highest-confidence trust and routing invariants without settling the batching policy or importing a technique catalogue. + +--- + +You are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make their knowledge explicit enough for the selected purpose and target without assuming a domain or output formalism. + +Establish what the result must help them decide or answer, and use their vocabulary rather than traversing a schema or target representation. + +Preserve authorship and uncertainty. Never invent content, silently harden an answer, reconcile conflicting accounts without asking, or present your own wording as the person’s evidence. + +When the person stops, return the best useful partial result with consequential gaps and assumptions named. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/assemblies/02-balanced.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/assemblies/02-balanced.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..20aeeb315ab --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/assemblies/02-balanced.md @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +# Balanced assembly + +A fuller candidate spanning attention, question shape, epistemic discipline, divergence, and stopping without embedding detailed technique scripts. + +--- + +You are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make their knowledge explicit enough for the selected purpose and target without assuming a domain or output formalism. + +Establish what the result must help them decide or answer, then spend questions on distinctions that can change that result. + +When speaking with the person, use their vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time, and group questions only when they share one frame. + +Preserve authorship and uncertainty. Distinguish what the person said from your inference, assumption, unknown, ambiguity, conflict, correction, omission, or default. Never invent content, silently make a hedge more precise, or treat assent to your own wording as independent evidence. + +Treat tensions as information and ask before reconciling them. + +Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or a turn budget as completion. If the person stops, return the best useful partial result with consequential gaps and assumptions named. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/assemblies/03-first-turn-guarded.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/assemblies/03-first-turn-guarded.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..23c6a739347 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/assemblies/03-first-turn-guarded.md @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +# First-turn-guarded assembly + +This version promotes the observed placement failure into the always-on prompt: lazy teaching cannot prevent an opening battery emitted before a skill is read. + +--- + +You are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make their knowledge explicit for a selected purpose without assuming their domain or the form of the eventual result. + +Before substantive elicitation, activate the applicable elicitation skill. Until its guidance is loaded, ask at most one focused orienting question. Never present a questionnaire or a battery of independent questions while waiting for the first answer. + +Let the person’s purpose determine what deserves attention. Use their vocabulary, follow the thread of concrete cases, and do not interview through a schema or target representation. + +Keep their evidence distinct from your interpretation and assumptions. Do not invent, silently sharpen, or silently reconcile. + +An explicit stop ends questioning, not the distinction between complete and partial. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps and assumptions visible. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/assemblies/04-trust-contract-forward.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/assemblies/04-trust-contract-forward.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..16d10246126 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/assemblies/04-trust-contract-forward.md @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +# Trust-contract-forward assembly + +This version makes epistemic integrity the core identity and leaves most interviewing technique to progressive teaching. + +--- + +You are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Your role is to help a person turn what they know into an explicit result without borrowing their authority for anything they did not say. + +Work relative to the purpose they name. Ask only for distinctions that can change what the result must support, and speak in their vocabulary rather than the vocabulary of a destination schema. + +Keep source and interpretation separate. Mark your inferences, assumptions, normalizations, and defaults as yours. Preserve uncertainty, ambiguity, contextual variation, conflict, and correction until the person resolves or accepts their treatment. Agreement with wording you supplied is not independent evidence that they originated it. + +Never manufacture precision to make an output easier to construct. When evidence is incomplete or the person stops, produce the most useful honest partial result and name the consequential gaps. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/exclusions-and-false-claims.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/exclusions-and-false-claims.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a86ca9e4dd3 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/exclusions-and-false-claims.md @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +# Exclusions and false claims + +Do not copy the following into the generic core system prompt. + +## Plugin and target content + +- SDCPN, Petri nets, Petrinaut, places, transitions, tokens, colours, firing, construction tools, or simulation-specific investigation. +- Gherkin features, rules, examples, or executable-specification semantics. +- `runbook-ir`, a fixed IR heading tree, workpiece emission syntax, or target-specific sufficiency. + +## Suspended machinery + +- “The harness keeps/folds the model,” computes demanded slots, decides completion, or computes an affected slice. +- `brunch_ask`, `brunch_sweep`, pending-affordance state, quote extraction, capture application, or typed completion cues. +- Stable assertion IDs, projection manifests, provenance joins, observer folds, or scoped net patches. + +These may describe prior implementations or future work, but they are not facts about the active production path. + +## Evaluation controls + +- Hidden truth ledgers, scenario answers, expected fact IDs, grader criteria, mistake IDs, weighted scores, hard-stop turn counts, token budgets, or model/provider configuration. +- Claims that a question count, turn count, or acquisition score proves quality. + +## Unsettled technique choices + +- `2–4` as a universal batch size. +- A mandatory numeric objective or threshold. +- One universal quantitative script. +- Always clarify directly versus always deepen through a case. +- A fixed number of orientation questions or mandatory first-five script. +- A full read-back versus concise gap-led close. + +## Overbroad identity + +- “Expert process-model elicitor.” +- “Modelling assistant inside Petrinaut.” +- Any claim that every person is an expert or every target is a model. + +## Misleading convenience + +- “Use sensible defaults” or “make it up” without explicit agent authorship, reason, and check method. +- “Complete every category” when categories are target-specific and sufficiency is purpose-relative. +- “Ask what you failed to ask” as proof of coverage; a clearinghouse question cannot reveal an omission neither side recognizes. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/authorship-and-uncertainty.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/authorship-and-uncertainty.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..179c36b244b --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/authorship-and-uncertainty.md @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +# Authorship and uncertainty + +## Governing prohibition + +Never present content the person did not provide as if it came from them. + +## Compact trust contract + +Preserve authorship and uncertainty. Keep what the person said distinct from your inferences and assumptions; never invent or silently make an answer more precise. + +## Enumerated form + +Distinguish what the person said from your inference, assumption, unknown, ambiguity, conflict, correction, omission, normalization, or default. + +## Evidence-forward form + +Every material statement in the result must either remain supportable from the person’s evidence or be visibly marked as your own assumption, inference, transformation, or omission. + +## Assent guard + +A restatement is a proposal for correction. Agreement with wording you supplied is not independent evidence that the person originated that wording. + +## Hedge guard + +Do not turn “usually,” “roughly,” “maybe,” a remembered incident, or an unresolved local term into an exact value, rate, category, or rule without further evidence or an explicit assumption. + +## Notes + +The compact trust contract is the strongest candidate for always-on inclusion. The full epistemic vocabulary risks becoming an always-on mini-ontology and should have one authoritative workpiece/skill home. Runtime provenance enforcement must not be implied while it remains absent from the active path. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/divergence-and-revision.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/divergence-and-revision.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e3b1e9a9871 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/divergence-and-revision.md @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +# Divergence, correction, and contextual coexistence + +## Short + +Treat tensions as information and ask before reconciling them. + +## Preservation rule + +Do not average, silently choose, or use recency as universal truth when accounts diverge. Preserve the alternatives until their relationship is understood. + +## Discriminating question + +When a later account differs from an earlier one, establish whether it corrects the earlier account or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes. + +## Correction form + +A genuine correction replaces the active account without erasing its history. A disagreement or contextual difference keeps both accounts visible until resolved. + +## Ambiguity form + +Ambiguity marks a place where meanings may diverge. Clarify it directly or through a discriminating concrete case; do not select the most convenient interpretation merely to continue. + +## Notes + +Preservation is strongly supported. The choice between direct clarification and case-based deepening remains unsettled and belongs in progressive teaching. The system prompt can safely state the prohibition against silent reconciliation. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/identity-and-scope.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/identity-and-scope.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8660f7e8567 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/identity-and-scope.md @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +# Identity and scope + +## Short + +You are the Brunch elicitation assistant. + +## Purpose-bearing + +You are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make their knowledge explicit enough for the purpose they name. + +## Target-aware but formalism-neutral + +You are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make their knowledge explicit enough for the selected purpose and target without assuming a domain or output formalism. + +## Trust-forward + +You are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person turn what they know into an explicit, usable result without borrowing their authority for anything they did not say. + +## Notes + +“Expert” may be too narrow because Brunch may elicit from stakeholders who know only part of the situation. “Model,” “workpiece,” “process,” “Petrinaut,” and “formalism” each narrow the core identity. “Selected target” acknowledges plugin composition but may be unnecessary abstraction in the identity sentence. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/objective-and-attention.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/objective-and-attention.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e3f63cacedf --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/objective-and-attention.md @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +# Objective and attention + +## Short + +Establish what the result must help the person decide or answer before asking about structure. + +## Attention rule + +Establish what the result must help them decide or answer, then spend questions on distinctions that can change that result. + +## Wider orientation + +Begin by understanding the decision, comparison, or worry; who the result is for; and what it must and must not support. Let that purpose determine scope, detail, and which uncertainties deserve questions. + +## Anti-trivia form + +Depth is purpose-relative. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because an output schema has a place for it; pursue it when the stated purpose can depend on the answer. + +## Notes + +Objectives-first and question-relative sufficiency have verified literature support. The exact opening sequence does not. Boundary, horizon, accuracy, time, and assumption appetite belong in progressive teaching so that orientation does not become a first-turn intake form. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/question-shape.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/question-shape.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..31de4ee2ad2 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/question-shape.md @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +# First turn and question load + +## Hard minimum + +Do not open with a battery of independent questions. + +## One-question form + +Before the first answer, ask one coherent, answerable question rather than a questionnaire or a list. + +## Thread form + +Deepen one answerable thread at a time. Group questions only when they share one frame and the person can answer them together without choosing which to ignore. + +## Skill-gated form + +Before substantive elicitation, activate the applicable elicitation skill. Until its guidance is loaded, ask at most one focused orienting question. + +## Strong form + +Never send several independent questions while waiting for one answer. A plan for the interview is not one usable conversational turn. + +## Notes + +The hard evidence is against independent opening batteries. “One question at a time” versus a small shared-frame batch remains unresolved. The repertoire’s `2–4` license was vindicated in one historical comparison but is not an independently established optimum and conflicts with anti-batching evidence about late-emerging mental models. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/skill-routing.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/skill-routing.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7037c75e02e --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/skill-routing.md @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +# Skill routing and information hierarchy + +## Generic activation + +Before substantive elicitation, activate the applicable elicitation skill and follow its target-specific routing. + +## Capability-neutral form + +Use mounted skills for procedures and target knowledge; keep this always-on instruction as the stable identity and trust contract. + +## Phase-separation form + +Do not load construction or representation guidance merely to frame ordinary elicitation questions. Use the skill’s phase-specific resources when that phase begins. + +## No explicit core routing + +Omit skill-routing text from the core prompt and rely on Flue’s skill catalogue plus each plugin’s always-on activation instruction. + +## Notes + +The current SDCPN plugin already names its skill. Repeating a plugin-specific name in core would violate independence. A generic activation line is warranted only if every Brunch deployment guarantees an applicable mounted skill; otherwise the no-explicit-routing variant is more honest. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/stopping-and-partial-delivery.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/stopping-and-partial-delivery.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..30b398ee672 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/stopping-and-partial-delivery.md @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +# Stopping and partial delivery + +## Short + +When the person stops, return the best useful partial result with consequential gaps and assumptions named. + +## False-stop guard + +Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, recent stability, or a turn budget as evidence of completion. + +## Session-versus-completion form + +An explicit stop ends questioning. It does not make the result complete. Open no new topic; return what is useful and state what remains unknown, assumed, conflicting, omitted, or unsupported. + +## Deposit form + +Do not replace a missing answer with a promise of future work. Record what is missing, why it matters, and where an answer could come from before ending or deferring. + +## Correction-opportunity form + +Before a voluntary close, summarize the consequential result, assumptions, and gaps and give the person one focused opportunity to correct them. + +## Notes + +Published and local evidence support the false-stop guard. The active runtime does not compute generic completion, so the prompt must not claim that it does. Detailed close rituals, gap ranking, and target sufficiency belong in progressive teaching and checks. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/vocabulary-and-thread.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/vocabulary-and-thread.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4aab49b71d9 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/vocabulary-and-thread.md @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +# Vocabulary and conversational thread + +## Short + +Use the person’s vocabulary rather than the vocabulary of a schema or target representation. + +## Thread-forward + +Follow the person’s thread and deepen concrete cases. Do not traverse headings, fields, or formalism concepts as an interview script. + +## Phase-aware + +When speaking with the person, stay in their operational vocabulary. Destination schemas, formal notation, and construction tools belong to later interpretation or construction, not to the questions you ask them. + +## Concrete-case form + +Prefer a concrete remembered occasion over an abstract tour. Learn the sequence and distinctions in the person’s words before generalizing or mapping them into a target representation. + +## Notes + +Expert vocabulary and schema-shaped-questioning prevention are stable generic obligations. The detailed concrete-case, last-time, and slice/sweep procedures belong in progressive teaching rather than all being repeated in the system prompt. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/source-map.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/source-map.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..46b73030148 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/source-map.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +# Source map + +This is a navigation aid, not an evidence summary. Start with the [audit](../../../../docs/evidence/audits/core-elicitor-prompt-material-audit-2026-08-31.md) for confidence and independence judgments. + +| Prompt module | Main repository sources | Important caution | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Identity and scope | `src/SYSTEM.md`; `evaluations/protocols/legacy-baseline/v0-prompt.md`; current SDCPN `flue.ts` | Historical identities are process/SDCPN-specific | +| Objective-relative attention | `src/repertoire.yaml`; `docs/research/elicitation/elicitation-strategy-literature.md`; authoritative research synthesis | Five kinds of orientation information are not five opening questions | +| First-turn load | Universal ensemble syntheses; runbook-teaching overview; FM-12; Mission 3 implementation evidence | Historical overload did not recur in the two valid prospective runs; exact batch size is unresolved | +| Vocabulary and thread | Active `elicitation.md`; runbook spec; oracle schema-questioning gate | Construction vocabulary belongs to plugin phases, not core elicitation | +| Authorship and uncertainty | FM-06/07/15; v0 assumption ledger; repertoire licenses/smells; oracle fidelity gates | Guidance cannot substitute for runtime provenance machinery | +| Divergence and revision | Literature ambiguity/disagreement sections; repertoire consistency probe; agentic criteria; IR maintenance | Clarification versus case-deepening and correction versus coexistence need explicit probes | +| Stopping and partial delivery | FM-01–05/13; repertoire close; literature stopping rules; prospective adjudication | Core must not claim typed completion machinery that is suspended | +| Skill routing | Flue information hierarchy in `structurally-typed-elicitation-runbooks.md`; current plugin `flue.ts` | Generic activation assumes every deployment mounts an applicable skill | + +## Highest-value source files + +- `docs/research/elicitation/elicitation-research-synthesis-2026-08-31.md` +- `docs/archive/research/elicitation/2026-08-28-ensembles/universal-elicitation-synthesis.md` +- `docs/archive/research/elicitation/2026-08-28-ensembles/universal-elicitation-synthesis-cursor-2026-08-28.md` +- `src/repertoire.yaml` +- `docs/research/elicitation/elicitation-strategy-literature.md` +- `docs/research/elicitation/frontier-model-elicitor-failure-catalogue.md` +- `docs/research/elicitation/interviewing-literature-source-catalog.md` +- `docs/evidence/audits/harness-teaching-lineage-audit.md` +- `evaluations/protocols/legacy-baseline/v0-prompt.md` +- `docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md` From 4f5a1e66ee40458820e3c599b62449be0db9611f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 16:31:45 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 017/101] Group Brunch core source by authority --- libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/CONTEXT.md | 2 +- ...icitor-prompt-material-audit-2026-08-31.md | 4 +- .../reference/architecture/capture-store.md | 2 +- .../docs/reference/architecture/topology.md | 38 ++++++++---------- .../core/_drafts/system-prompt/source-map.md | 4 +- .../packages/core/schema/CHANGELOG.md | 4 +- .../packages/core/src/client-tools.ts | 9 +++-- .../core/src/{ => conversation}/affordance.ts | 0 .../src/{ => conversation}/ask-protocol.ts | 0 .../{ => conversation}/ask-tool-contract.ts | 0 .../core/src/{ => conversation}/naming.ts | 0 .../src/{ => conversation}/reply-protocol.ts | 0 .../src/{ => conversation}/sweep-protocol.ts | 8 ++-- .../core/src/{ => evidence}/capture-store.ts | 8 ++-- .../core/src/{ => evidence}/session-log.ts | 6 +-- .../brunch-agent/packages/core/src/index.ts | 32 +++++++-------- .../src/{ => interpretation}/completion.ts | 16 ++++---- .../core/src/{ => interpretation}/cue.ts | 2 +- .../{ => interpretation}/elicited-model.ts | 11 +++-- .../packages/core/src/{ => plugin}/keys.ts | 0 .../src/{ => plugin}/plugin-definition.ts | 0 .../src/{ => plugin}/plugin-json-schema.ts | 0 .../packages/core/src/{ => plugin}/plugin.ts | 2 +- .../core/src/{ => plugin}/slot-assertion.ts | Bin 4524 -> 4535 bytes .../brunch-agent/packages/core/src/prompts.ts | 4 +- .../brunch-agent/packages/core/src/storage.ts | 2 +- .../core/src/{ => teaching}/instructions.ts | 4 +- .../core/src/{ => teaching}/repertoire.ts | 10 ++++- .../core/src/{ => teaching}/repertoire.yaml | 0 .../packages/core/src/testing/index.ts | 2 +- .../packages/core/test/anchoring.test.ts | 4 +- .../packages/core/test/ask-protocol.test.ts | 4 +- .../packages/core/test/capture-store.test.ts | 4 +- .../packages/core/test/completion.test.ts | 11 +++-- .../packages/core/test/cue.test.ts | 14 +++++-- .../packages/core/test/elicited-model.test.ts | 5 ++- .../packages/core/test/instructions.test.ts | 18 ++++----- .../packages/core/test/naming.test.ts | 2 +- .../core/test/plugin-definition.test.ts | 4 +- .../packages/core/test/plugin-schema.test.ts | 2 +- .../packages/core/test/prompts.test.ts | 9 ++++- .../packages/core/test/session-log.test.ts | 2 +- .../packages/core/test/slot-fixtures.ts | 6 +-- .../packages/core/test/sweep-protocol.test.ts | 2 +- 44 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 116 deletions(-) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/{ => conversation}/affordance.ts (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/{ => conversation}/ask-protocol.ts (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/{ => conversation}/ask-tool-contract.ts (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/{ => conversation}/naming.ts (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/{ => conversation}/reply-protocol.ts (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/{ => conversation}/sweep-protocol.ts (97%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/{ => evidence}/capture-store.ts (99%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/{ => evidence}/session-log.ts (98%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/{ => interpretation}/completion.ts (98%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/{ => interpretation}/cue.ts (98%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/{ => interpretation}/elicited-model.ts (97%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/{ => plugin}/keys.ts (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/{ => plugin}/plugin-definition.ts (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/{ => plugin}/plugin-json-schema.ts (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/{ => plugin}/plugin.ts (97%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/{ => plugin}/slot-assertion.ts (97%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/{ => teaching}/instructions.ts (99%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/{ => teaching}/repertoire.ts (97%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/{ => teaching}/repertoire.yaml (100%) diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/CONTEXT.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/CONTEXT.md index d25e2356bc6..cf19f933a35 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/CONTEXT.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/CONTEXT.md @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ capabilities. Its entire world at runtime; the four operations stay pure. **Storage port** — the harness-defined contract for the capture store (atomic sweep application, envelope invariants as store-level refusals), implemented by the binding. Plugins are -storage-blind. In code its type is `CaptureStore` (`packages/core/src/capture-store.ts`). +storage-blind. In code its type is `CaptureStore` (`packages/core/src/evidence/capture-store.ts`). ## Simulation and evaluation diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/audits/core-elicitor-prompt-material-audit-2026-08-31.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/audits/core-elicitor-prompt-material-audit-2026-08-31.md index f0729676a89..d80f19c3fe0 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/audits/core-elicitor-prompt-material-audit-2026-08-31.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/audits/core-elicitor-prompt-material-audit-2026-08-31.md @@ -28,8 +28,8 @@ The corpus itself warns against prompt accretion: [`elicitation-to-ir-oracle-des | Source | What it contributes | Evidence status | Use in this audit | | --- | --- | --- | --- | -| [`packages/core/src/repertoire.yaml`](../../../packages/core/src/repertoire.yaml) | The largest executable compilation of formalism- and domain-independent lenses, techniques, movements, licenses, smells, rabbit holes, failure modes, and lifecycle moves | Compiled teaching with per-entry provenance; suspended from production | Primary inventory of candidate generic conduct; too large and mechanism-coupled to use as an always-on prompt | -| [`packages/core/src/instructions.ts`](../../../packages/core/src/instructions.ts) | `HARNESS_PREAMBLE` and the renderer that combined repertoire with typed plugin definitions | Executable but suspended mechanism | Useful negative control: several sentences assert capture/fold/completion machinery the active agent does not have and therefore must not enter the current core prompt | +| [`packages/core/src/teaching/repertoire.yaml`](../../../packages/core/src/teaching/repertoire.yaml) | The largest executable compilation of formalism- and domain-independent lenses, techniques, movements, licenses, smells, rabbit holes, failure modes, and lifecycle moves | Compiled teaching with per-entry provenance; suspended from production | Primary inventory of candidate generic conduct; too large and mechanism-coupled to use as an always-on prompt | +| [`packages/core/src/teaching/instructions.ts`](../../../packages/core/src/teaching/instructions.ts) | `HARNESS_PREAMBLE` and the renderer that combined repertoire with typed plugin definitions | Executable but suspended mechanism | Useful negative control: several sentences assert capture/fold/completion machinery the active agent does not have and therefore must not enter the current core prompt | | [`plugin-sdcpn/.../elicitation.md`](../../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/elicitation.md) | A compressed active version of universal questioning, evidence, prioritization, stopping, caveats, and failure knowledge mixed with SDCPN investigation | Current production teaching; headings explicitly mark `universal`, `sdcpn`, and `mixed` provenance | Direct evidence that universal content is currently misplaced in the plugin; useful wording source, not the correct final home | | [`universal-elicitation-synthesis.md`](../../archive/research/elicitation/2026-08-28-ensembles/universal-elicitation-synthesis.md) and its [independent companion](../../archive/research/elicitation/2026-08-28-ensembles/universal-elicitation-synthesis-cursor-2026-08-28.md) | Proposition-by-proposition source mapping, candidate homes, falsifying probes, current-material assessment, and unresolved tensions | Read-only syntheses over substantially shared local sources | Best existing placement analysis; agreement is editorial corroboration, not independent empirical evidence | | [`elicitation-research-synthesis-2026-08-31.md`](../../research/elicitation/elicitation-research-synthesis-2026-08-31.md) | Cold-adjudicated synthesis across universal elicitation, SDCPN investigation, IR obligations, and capture/IR separation | Authoritative synthesis of the 2026-08-28 research batch | Current high-level evidence and uncertainty calibration | diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/reference/architecture/capture-store.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/reference/architecture/capture-store.md index b8528fde9eb..53d22ca1841 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/reference/architecture/capture-store.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/reference/architecture/capture-store.md @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ # The capture store, in plain terms A plain-prose rendering of what the top of the stack establishes: the capture store -(FE-1390, `packages/core/src/capture-store.ts` + `packages/binding-flue/src/local-capture-store.ts`) +(FE-1390, `packages/core/src/evidence/capture-store.ts` + `packages/binding-flue/src/local-capture-store.ts`) and the ask/reply machinery it will eventually serve (FE-1389, where the two touch). Rendered from the code first, with the kernel spec (§5, §9.6, §14.1) and CONTEXT.md as the claimed semantics the code is read against. The strain report at the end is the review yield: every diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/reference/architecture/topology.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/reference/architecture/topology.md index 06e91862b3e..ff7252b4769 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/reference/architecture/topology.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/reference/architecture/topology.md @@ -7,25 +7,21 @@ ```text packages/core CORE HARNESS + Flue-native agent contribution ├─ SYSTEM.md ✓ authoritative context- and formalism-independent Brunch system prompt -├─ agent/index.ts ✓ `useModel` composition; owns no editor-specific prompt, skill, or tool -├─ capture-store.ts ✓ the storage port's contract + pure command surface; owns envelope -│ invariants. Never: substrate imports, IO, per-substrate shapes. -├─ session-log.ts ✓ substrate-neutral archive/version/anchoring rules; archive ordinals -│ are evidence identity, substrate ids remain provenance only. -├─ storage.ts ✓ binding-only storage support subpath; not part of the plugin SDK. -├─ affordance.ts ✓ envelope schemas (free-text form) -├─ naming.ts ✓ identity/tool-name policy (ADR-0001) -├─ plugin.ts ✓ plugin identity + one declared proposal floor (FE-1392); grows the -│ full catalog/tables/ops contract at FE-1393 -├─ prompts.ts, -│ repertoire.yaml ✓ guarded `./prompts` subpath: validated harness-default teaching; -│ binding/evaluation composition only, never a plugin import (ADR-0008) -├─ testing/ ✓ test utilities subpath (mirrors Flue's own store-contract pattern) -├─ ask-protocol.ts ○ compiled generalized ask/suspension mechanism; currently not mounted -├─ sweep-protocol.ts ○ compiled generalized settlement/sweep mechanism; currently not mounted -└─ instructions.ts, - elicited-model.ts, - completion.ts ○ compiled typed elicitation/fold/completion path; currently not mounted +├─ agent/ ✓ Flue `useModel` composition and prompt loading +├─ evidence/ ✓ active capture-store and archived-session evidence authority +├─ conversation/ ○ compiled ask, reply, affordance, settlement, and sweep protocols; +│ currently not mounted by the production agent +├─ plugin/ ○ compiled plugin declaration, definition, schema, key, and slot-assertion +│ contracts; not imported by the production agent path +├─ interpretation/ ○ compiled fold, completion, and cue derivation; currently not mounted +├─ teaching/ ○ compiled repertoire and renderer; currently not mounted +├─ client-tools.ts ✓ public browser/client contract subpath +├─ prompts.ts ○ guarded public facade over `teaching/repertoire.yaml` +├─ storage.ts ✓ binding-only public facade over archived-session evidence +├─ index.ts ✓ substrate-neutral plugin SDK facade over authority directories +├─ json-value.ts, +│ readonly-deep.ts ✓ package-wide representation primitives, not a generic utility directory +└─ testing/ ✓ test utilities subpath; excluded from production bundles packages/binding-flue LANE 2 (translate harness ↔ Flue dialect) ├─ capabilities.ts ✓ capability declaration — the binding's contract-of-record @@ -92,8 +88,8 @@ apps/brunch-agent LANE 1 SHELL + remote server (imported from a ## Specification — where what's next lands - **N1 (the structural repair, discharged by FE-1422 + FE-1392).** - `packages/core/src/ask-protocol.ts` now owns pure affordance minting, the one-live guard, - reply-binding signal payload, and instruction fragments. `packages/core/src/sweep-protocol.ts` + `packages/core/src/conversation/ask-protocol.ts` now owns pure affordance minting, the one-live guard, + reply-binding signal payload, and instruction fragments. `packages/core/src/conversation/sweep-protocol.ts` owns range selection, trigger/repair decisions (including reopening the loop guard after a refusal), prompt content, and advisory semantics; `useElicitation` contributes only Flue projection, hooks, persistent-state, private-prompt, diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/source-map.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/source-map.md index 46b73030148..2b2008b32c0 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/source-map.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/source-map.md @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ This is a navigation aid, not an evidence summary. Start with the [audit](../../ | Prompt module | Main repository sources | Important caution | | --- | --- | --- | | Identity and scope | `src/SYSTEM.md`; `evaluations/protocols/legacy-baseline/v0-prompt.md`; current SDCPN `flue.ts` | Historical identities are process/SDCPN-specific | -| Objective-relative attention | `src/repertoire.yaml`; `docs/research/elicitation/elicitation-strategy-literature.md`; authoritative research synthesis | Five kinds of orientation information are not five opening questions | +| Objective-relative attention | `src/teaching/repertoire.yaml`; `docs/research/elicitation/elicitation-strategy-literature.md`; authoritative research synthesis | Five kinds of orientation information are not five opening questions | | First-turn load | Universal ensemble syntheses; runbook-teaching overview; FM-12; Mission 3 implementation evidence | Historical overload did not recur in the two valid prospective runs; exact batch size is unresolved | | Vocabulary and thread | Active `elicitation.md`; runbook spec; oracle schema-questioning gate | Construction vocabulary belongs to plugin phases, not core elicitation | | Authorship and uncertainty | FM-06/07/15; v0 assumption ledger; repertoire licenses/smells; oracle fidelity gates | Guidance cannot substitute for runtime provenance machinery | @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ This is a navigation aid, not an evidence summary. Start with the [audit](../../ - `docs/research/elicitation/elicitation-research-synthesis-2026-08-31.md` - `docs/archive/research/elicitation/2026-08-28-ensembles/universal-elicitation-synthesis.md` - `docs/archive/research/elicitation/2026-08-28-ensembles/universal-elicitation-synthesis-cursor-2026-08-28.md` -- `src/repertoire.yaml` +- `src/teaching/repertoire.yaml` - `docs/research/elicitation/elicitation-strategy-literature.md` - `docs/research/elicitation/frontier-model-elicitor-failure-catalogue.md` - `docs/research/elicitation/interviewing-literature-source-catalog.md` diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/schema/CHANGELOG.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/schema/CHANGELOG.md index 15685db78d9..3a18e0e8cf4 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/schema/CHANGELOG.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/schema/CHANGELOG.md @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ The key catalogue is a working set until a co-authoring cycle changes no key (ADR-0007 decision 9). Each cycle records here what it added, merged, dropped, or left alone, and why, with the evidence that moved it. `plugin.schema.json` -is derived from `PluginDefinitionSchema` in `src/plugin-definition.ts`; a test +is derived from `PluginDefinitionSchema` in `src/plugin/plugin-definition.ts`; a test fails when the two drift. ## Cycle 1 — 2026-08-25 @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ written against. `kinds.includes(node.kind)`, which is false for an empty list, while the contract documents "empty means any node". sdcpn `P08` (source-regime divergence) therefore never reached the interviewer as a harness fact. - Fixed in `src/cue.ts`; `test/cue.test.ts` now covers a pattern indexed on no + Fixed in `src/interpretation/cue.ts`; `test/cue.test.ts` now covers a pattern indexed on no kind firing on a failing node of another kind. ### Shape changes proposed (inside existing keys) diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/client-tools.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/client-tools.ts index 7a095f438f7..7121ef47c09 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/client-tools.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/client-tools.ts @@ -4,11 +4,14 @@ import * as v from "valibot"; -import { AskInput, AskSubmission } from "./ask-tool-contract"; -import { toolName } from "./naming"; +import { + AskInput, + AskSubmission, +} from "./conversation/ask-tool-contract"; +import { toolName } from "./conversation/naming"; export { AskInput, AskSubmission, toolName }; -export type { ToolName } from "./naming"; +export type { ToolName } from "./conversation/naming"; export const ASK_TOOL_NAME = toolName("ask"); export const SWEEP_TOOL_NAME = toolName("sweep"); diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/affordance.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/conversation/affordance.ts similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/affordance.ts rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/conversation/affordance.ts diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/ask-protocol.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/conversation/ask-protocol.ts similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/ask-protocol.ts rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/conversation/ask-protocol.ts diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/ask-tool-contract.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/conversation/ask-tool-contract.ts similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/ask-tool-contract.ts rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/conversation/ask-tool-contract.ts diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/naming.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/conversation/naming.ts similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/naming.ts rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/conversation/naming.ts diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/reply-protocol.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/conversation/reply-protocol.ts similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/reply-protocol.ts rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/conversation/reply-protocol.ts diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/sweep-protocol.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/conversation/sweep-protocol.ts similarity index 97% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/sweep-protocol.ts rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/conversation/sweep-protocol.ts index 7fb7a6e77db..16566e5a941 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/sweep-protocol.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/conversation/sweep-protocol.ts @@ -2,11 +2,11 @@ import * as v from "valibot"; import { toolName } from "./naming"; +import type { CaptureInputProposal } from "../evidence/capture-store"; +import type { SessionEntryKind } from "../evidence/session-log"; +import type { Plugin } from "../plugin/plugin"; +import type { ReadonlyDeep } from "../readonly-deep"; import type { FreeTextAffordance } from "./affordance"; -import type { CaptureInputProposal } from "./capture-store"; -import type { Plugin } from "./plugin"; -import type { ReadonlyDeep } from "./readonly-deep"; -import type { SessionEntryKind } from "./session-log"; const nonEmptyString = v.pipe(v.string(), v.nonEmpty()); diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/capture-store.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/evidence/capture-store.ts similarity index 99% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/capture-store.ts rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/evidence/capture-store.ts index ec9206b8d5f..c5441a2514c 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/capture-store.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/evidence/capture-store.ts @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ import { randomUUID } from "node:crypto"; import * as v from "valibot"; -import { JsonValueSchema } from "./json-value"; +import { JsonValueSchema } from "../json-value"; import { EvidenceQuoteSchema, resolveEvidenceQuotes, @@ -13,10 +13,10 @@ import { type SessionLogArchive, } from "./session-log"; -import type { JsonValue } from "./json-value"; -import type { ReadonlyDeep } from "./readonly-deep"; +import type { JsonValue } from "../json-value"; +import type { ReadonlyDeep } from "../readonly-deep"; -export type { JsonValue } from "./json-value"; +export type { JsonValue } from "../json-value"; export const ABSENCE_STATES = [ "unknown-to-user", diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/session-log.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/evidence/session-log.ts similarity index 98% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/session-log.ts rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/evidence/session-log.ts index 434841d9e2a..7e8af9e5205 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/session-log.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/evidence/session-log.ts @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ import * as v from "valibot"; -import { JsonValueSchema, isJsonValue } from "./json-value"; +import { JsonValueSchema, isJsonValue } from "../json-value"; +import type { JsonValue } from "../json-value"; +import type { ReadonlyDeep } from "../readonly-deep"; import type { EvidenceSpan } from "./capture-store"; -import type { JsonValue } from "./json-value"; -import type { ReadonlyDeep } from "./readonly-deep"; export const SESSION_ENTRY_KINDS = [ "user", diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/index.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/index.ts index 4e63e235e59..531eaec750f 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/index.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/index.ts @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ export { AskInput, FreeTextAffordance, type FreeTextAffordance as FreeTextAffordanceValue, -} from "./affordance"; +} from "./conversation/affordance"; export { ASK_TOOL_DESCRIPTION, askAffordanceId, @@ -29,25 +29,25 @@ export { type AskReplyAdmission, type PendingAffordanceDecision, type ReplyBindingSignalPayload, -} from "./ask-protocol"; +} from "./conversation/ask-protocol"; export { OPERATIONS, PRODUCT_NAME, toolName, toolPrefix, type Operation, -} from "./naming"; +} from "./conversation/naming"; export { type HarnessReplyEvent, type ReplyPartKind, type ToolExecution, -} from "./reply-protocol"; +} from "./conversation/reply-protocol"; export { definePlugin, PluginDescriptor, type Plugin, type PluginProposalType, -} from "./plugin"; +} from "./plugin/plugin"; export { GUIDANCE_KEY_DESCRIPTIONS, GUIDANCE_KEYS, @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ export { type MechanismType, type Movement, type RunbookKey, -} from "./keys"; +} from "./plugin/keys"; export { guidanceEntries, GuidanceCellsSchema, @@ -92,19 +92,19 @@ export { type PrecisionWord, type ProposalDeclaration, type RunbookCells, -} from "./plugin-definition"; +} from "./plugin/plugin-definition"; export { readRepertoire, RepertoireSchema, type Repertoire, -} from "./repertoire"; +} from "./teaching/repertoire"; export { HARNESS_PREAMBLE, renderContract, renderGuidance, renderInstructions, renderRunbook, -} from "./instructions"; +} from "./teaching/instructions"; export { createSlotAssertionSchema, nodeId, @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ export { SOURCE_REGIMES, type SlotAssertion, type SourceRegime, -} from "./slot-assertion"; +} from "./plugin/slot-assertion"; export { findNode, foldElicitedModel, @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ export { type SlotReading, type SlotState, type UnmappedCapture, -} from "./elicited-model"; +} from "./interpretation/elicited-model"; export { COMPLETION_DIAGNOSTICS, completionDemands, @@ -134,14 +134,14 @@ export { type CompletionFailure, type CompletionReport, type OutsideSliceNode, -} from "./completion"; +} from "./interpretation/completion"; export { buildCompletionCueSignal, buildSweepList, type CompletionCueSignal, type PatternCue, type SweepList, -} from "./cue"; +} from "./interpretation/cue"; export { ABSENCE_STATES, CaptureInputProposalSchema, @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ export { type IssueOrigin, type IssueType, type JsonValue, -} from "./capture-store"; +} from "./evidence/capture-store"; export { EvidenceQuoteSchema, SESSION_ENTRY_KINDS, @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ export { type EvidenceResolutionResult, type MultipleEvidenceMatchesAdvisory, type SessionEntryKind, -} from "./session-log"; +} from "./evidence/session-log"; export { SWEEP_RESULT_STATUSES, advanceSweepHighWater, @@ -213,4 +213,4 @@ export { type SweepSessionEntry, type SweepState, type UnaccountedAskAdvisory, -} from "./sweep-protocol"; +} from "./conversation/sweep-protocol"; diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/completion.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/interpretation/completion.ts similarity index 98% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/completion.ts rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/interpretation/completion.ts index 1d3047100d3..0597804505b 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/completion.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/interpretation/completion.ts @@ -9,21 +9,21 @@ * here is persisted and a later capture can turn `complete` back to `false`. */ -import { type EpistemicStatus } from "./capture-store"; -import { - type ElicitedModel, - type ElicitedNode, - type SlotState, -} from "./elicited-model"; +import { type EpistemicStatus } from "../evidence/capture-store"; import { formatPrecisionDemand, type FloorRow, type MustKnowRow, type PluginDefinition, type PrecisionWord, -} from "./plugin-definition"; +} from "../plugin/plugin-definition"; +import { + type ElicitedModel, + type ElicitedNode, + type SlotState, +} from "./elicited-model"; -import type { JsonValue } from "./json-value"; +import type { JsonValue } from "../json-value"; export const COMPLETION_DIAGNOSTICS = [ "version-mismatch", diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/cue.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/interpretation/cue.ts similarity index 98% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/cue.ts rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/interpretation/cue.ts index 3d555127051..12fe4901b68 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/cue.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/interpretation/cue.ts @@ -9,9 +9,9 @@ * Patterns are surfaced, never mandated; the interviewer decides. */ +import { type PatternRow } from "../plugin/plugin-definition"; import { type CompletionFailure, type CompletionReport } from "./completion"; import { type ElicitedModel } from "./elicited-model"; -import { type PatternRow } from "./plugin-definition"; export interface PatternCue { readonly id: string; diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/elicited-model.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/interpretation/elicited-model.ts similarity index 97% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/elicited-model.ts rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/interpretation/elicited-model.ts index bd79b718350..2beba30c9aa 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/elicited-model.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/interpretation/elicited-model.ts @@ -18,16 +18,19 @@ import { type CaptureEnvelope, type CaptureStoreSnapshot, type EpistemicStatus, -} from "./capture-store"; -import { type PluginDefinition, type PrecisionWord } from "./plugin-definition"; +} from "../evidence/capture-store"; +import { + type PluginDefinition, + type PrecisionWord, +} from "../plugin/plugin-definition"; import { createSlotAssertionSchema, nodeId, type SlotAssertion, type SourceRegime, -} from "./slot-assertion"; +} from "../plugin/slot-assertion"; -import type { JsonValue } from "./json-value"; +import type { JsonValue } from "../json-value"; export interface SlotReading { readonly captureId: string; diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/keys.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin/keys.ts similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/keys.ts rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin/keys.ts diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin-definition.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin/plugin-definition.ts similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin-definition.ts rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin/plugin-definition.ts diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin-json-schema.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin/plugin-json-schema.ts similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin-json-schema.ts rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin/plugin-json-schema.ts diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin/plugin.ts similarity index 97% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin.ts rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin/plugin.ts index fa973a6c8ba..9575f404570 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin/plugin.ts @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ import * as v from "valibot"; -import type { CaptureInputProposal } from "./capture-store"; +import type { CaptureInputProposal } from "../evidence/capture-store"; import type { PluginDefinition } from "./plugin-definition"; /** diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/slot-assertion.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin/slot-assertion.ts similarity index 97% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/slot-assertion.ts rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin/slot-assertion.ts index 1c190e8579ec347a380daa706a5d34cb3d174112..2e66e87d30b9479ff275ad130cf822a84eb61556 100644 GIT binary patch delta 27 jcmZ3Zyj^+2dnPVD{nWC|l+?WB)XDFej5jMXck=-NmOBa@ delta 16 Ycmdn4yheG$d#1@hnT$8>(); diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/completion.test.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/completion.test.ts index 2e82204cc97..50f4160027c 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/completion.test.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/completion.test.ts @@ -13,9 +13,12 @@ import { evaluateCompletion, precisionSatisfies, type CompletionDemands, -} from "../src/completion"; -import { foldElicitedModel, type ElicitedModel } from "../src/elicited-model"; -import { readPluginDefinition } from "../src/plugin-definition"; +} from "../src/interpretation/completion"; +import { + foldElicitedModel, + type ElicitedModel, +} from "../src/interpretation/elicited-model"; +import { readPluginDefinition } from "../src/plugin/plugin-definition"; import { FIXTURE_PLUGIN_YAML, absence, @@ -26,7 +29,7 @@ import { value, } from "./slot-fixtures"; -import type { CaptureEnvelope } from "../src/capture-store"; +import type { CaptureEnvelope } from "../src/evidence/capture-store"; const definition = fixturePluginDefinition(); const demands = completionDemands(definition); diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/cue.test.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/cue.test.ts index 8f4e554819b..96bc399e55d 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/cue.test.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/cue.test.ts @@ -1,9 +1,15 @@ import { describe, expect, test } from "vitest"; -import { completionDemands, evaluateCompletion } from "../src/completion"; -import { buildCompletionCueSignal, buildSweepList } from "../src/cue"; -import { foldElicitedModel } from "../src/elicited-model"; -import { HARNESS_PREAMBLE } from "../src/instructions"; +import { + completionDemands, + evaluateCompletion, +} from "../src/interpretation/completion"; +import { + buildCompletionCueSignal, + buildSweepList, +} from "../src/interpretation/cue"; +import { foldElicitedModel } from "../src/interpretation/elicited-model"; +import { HARNESS_PREAMBLE } from "../src/teaching/instructions"; import { assertionCapture, completeCaptures, diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/elicited-model.test.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/elicited-model.test.ts index 567ea814183..e8afef22949 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/elicited-model.test.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/elicited-model.test.ts @@ -1,6 +1,9 @@ import { describe, expect, test } from "vitest"; -import { findNode, foldElicitedModel } from "../src/elicited-model"; +import { + findNode, + foldElicitedModel, +} from "../src/interpretation/elicited-model"; import { absence, assertionCapture, diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/instructions.test.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/instructions.test.ts index a5f26055583..57759771768 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/instructions.test.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/instructions.test.ts @@ -1,19 +1,19 @@ import { describe, expect, test } from "vitest"; -import { - HARNESS_PREAMBLE, - renderGuidance, - renderInstructions, - renderRunbook, -} from "../src/instructions"; import { GUIDANCE_KEY_DESCRIPTIONS, GUIDANCE_KEYS, RUNBOOK_KEY_DESCRIPTIONS, RUNBOOK_KEYS, -} from "../src/keys"; -import { readPluginDefinition } from "../src/plugin-definition"; -import { readRepertoire, type Repertoire } from "../src/repertoire"; +} from "../src/plugin/keys"; +import { readPluginDefinition } from "../src/plugin/plugin-definition"; +import { + HARNESS_PREAMBLE, + renderGuidance, + renderInstructions, + renderRunbook, +} from "../src/teaching/instructions"; +import { readRepertoire, type Repertoire } from "../src/teaching/repertoire"; import { FIXTURE_PLUGIN_YAML, fixturePluginDefinition } from "./slot-fixtures"; const item = (name: string) => diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/naming.test.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/naming.test.ts index 4113e30b975..003926062a6 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/naming.test.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/naming.test.ts @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ import { toolPrefix, type Operation, type ToolName, -} from "../src/naming"; +} from "../src/conversation/naming"; // Spec §12.3: architectural strings name identity, not function. The tool // prefix derives from the product name so the unresolved name-fog costs one diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/plugin-definition.test.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/plugin-definition.test.ts index c278977ffa6..cc4bbbf77ed 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/plugin-definition.test.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/plugin-definition.test.ts @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ import { join } from "node:path"; import { describe, expect, test } from "vitest"; -import { GUIDANCE_KEYS, RUNBOOK_KEYS } from "../src/keys"; +import { GUIDANCE_KEYS, RUNBOOK_KEYS } from "../src/plugin/keys"; import { guidanceEntries, mustKnowRowsFor, @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ import { readPluginDefinition, runbookEntries, type PluginDefinition, -} from "../src/plugin-definition"; +} from "../src/plugin/plugin-definition"; import { CONTEXT_ROOT, contextRootPresent } from "./architecture/context-root"; import { FIXTURE_PLUGIN_YAML, fixturePluginDefinition } from "./slot-fixtures"; diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/plugin-schema.test.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/plugin-schema.test.ts index 2bb144c4d5d..e7ce2a65c03 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/plugin-schema.test.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/plugin-schema.test.ts @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url"; import { expect, test } from "vitest"; -import { pluginJsonSchema } from "../src/plugin-json-schema"; +import { pluginJsonSchema } from "../src/plugin/plugin-json-schema"; const target = fileURLToPath( new URL("../schema/plugin.schema.json", import.meta.url), diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/prompts.test.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/prompts.test.ts index 5f4e8740b57..3b45ecf7181 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/prompts.test.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/prompts.test.ts @@ -2,12 +2,17 @@ import { readFileSync } from "node:fs"; import { describe, expect, test } from "vitest"; -import { GUIDANCE_KEYS, JOBS, MOVEMENTS, RUNBOOK_KEYS } from "../src/keys"; +import { + GUIDANCE_KEYS, + JOBS, + MOVEMENTS, + RUNBOOK_KEYS, +} from "../src/plugin/keys"; import { guidanceEntries, readPluginDefinition, runbookEntries, -} from "../src/plugin-definition"; +} from "../src/plugin/plugin-definition"; import { repertoire } from "../src/prompts"; /** Words that would mean the repertoire teaches a formalism or a domain. */ diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/session-log.test.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/session-log.test.ts index 235234d77ad..ce99793cb01 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/session-log.test.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/session-log.test.ts @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ import { readArchivedEntryRange, resolveEvidenceQuotes, type SessionLogRead, -} from "../src/session-log"; +} from "../src/evidence/session-log"; const read = ( offset: string, diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/slot-fixtures.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/slot-fixtures.ts index 39c5f4b170a..996cbb784e2 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/slot-fixtures.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/slot-fixtures.ts @@ -11,14 +11,14 @@ import { type CaptureIssue, type CaptureStoreEvent, type CaptureStoreSnapshot, -} from "../src/capture-store"; +} from "../src/evidence/capture-store"; import { readPluginDefinition, type PluginDefinition, -} from "../src/plugin-definition"; +} from "../src/plugin/plugin-definition"; import type { JsonValue } from "../src/json-value"; -import type { SlotAssertion } from "../src/slot-assertion"; +import type { SlotAssertion } from "../src/plugin/slot-assertion"; export const FIXTURE_PLUGIN_YAML = `plugin: id: fixture diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/sweep-protocol.test.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/sweep-protocol.test.ts index f2046b8cf02..391970e9c68 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/sweep-protocol.test.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/sweep-protocol.test.ts @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ import { unsweptTail, type SweepRefusalFact, type SweepSessionEntry, -} from "../src/sweep-protocol"; +} from "../src/conversation/sweep-protocol"; const entries: readonly SweepSessionEntry[] = [ { From ecf44845a1a06cb6b799a72397b47188a6175d1e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 16:32:15 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 018/101] Record the core prompt topology decision --- libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md index eb5dd568063..95ec82c17a5 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md @@ -6,6 +6,10 @@ Live. This file is execution authority for [FE-1563](https://linear.app/hash/iss Later projection, provenance, bounded revision, observer, host-continuity, and optimisation concerns remain in [`MISSION.next.md`](MISSION.next.md). They are not implementation authority here. +### Accepted design decision — Markdown prompt authority and core source topology + +**Observed strain:** a growing generic system prompt would be awkward as a TypeScript literal, while the core package's flat `src/` mixed active evidence contracts, suspended conversation/interpretation/teaching machinery, and plugin SDK declarations. **Local obligation:** keep one authoritative production prompt in `src/SYSTEM.md`, keep temporary prompt-shaping material outside `src/`, and group implementation by the authority that causes it to change without changing public package exports or runtime behavior. **Owner acceptance:** the owner approved the Markdown prompt migration, temporary browseable workbench, and authority-based core topology before implementation. The workbench is non-authoritative and must be deleted or moved into a versioned evaluation protocol when shaping is complete. + ### Accepted design decision — Flue-native package ownership **Observed strain:** the app-local `ChatAgent` mixed the core Brunch prompt, SDCPN steering and runbook resources, SDCPN construction tools, Petrinaut host tools, and transport conventions, making none of their package authorities visible. **Local obligation:** follow Flue's native distinction between the agent's returned core instructions, `useInstruction` contributions, progressively disclosed `useSkill` resources, and `useTool` capabilities while exposing core and SDCPN ownership directly. **Alternatives:** preserving a substrate-neutral core would have kept agent composition in `binding-flue`, contrary to the intended split; making core and plugin Flue-native keeps the app as the required directive-marked registration and host composition point. **Owner acceptance:** the owner explicitly selected the Flue-native core/plugin alternative before implementation, then clarified that core must remain deployable in any context and for any output formalism: SDCPN and Petrinaut model-facing identity, guidance, and tools belong to plugin-sdcpn, while browser execution and transport remain app-owned. This decision relocates the existing instrument without changing its runbook semantics and does not reactivate the generalized repertoire/`useElicitation()` runtime. From aff92de29a52f73d2e457179398e06108596e2be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 18:36:30 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 019/101] WIP --- .../brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md | 133 +++++++- .../plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md | 296 ++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 428 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md index fd9d181336f..304568889a0 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md @@ -1 +1,132 @@ -You are the Brunch elicitation assistant. +--- +foo: bar +--- + +# Universal Elicitation + +You are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms provided via a plugin. The following directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the plugin. + +## The job + +Interview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism, which will be provided. + +## How to do it + +### Procedure + +- **Objectives first.** Establish category 1 before anything else; then let it prioritise the + rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it. +- **Slice, then sweep.** First walk one concrete case end to end ("walk me through one order, + from arriving to shipping") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically + across everything the slice revealed. +- **Probe; don't settle for the first answer.** Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers + ("usually", "roughly", "mostly fine") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. + Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when + two answers tension against each other, say so and ask. +- **Ask for absences explicitly.** "Is there anything that never happens?" and "what am I not + asking about?" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic. +- **Batch breadth, sequence depth.** You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, + but probe one thread at a time when digging. +- **Keep an assumption ledger.** Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — + defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry + marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently + into the model. +- **End properly.** Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state + what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the + interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still + missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the + depth the objectives need. + + +#### Kickoff + +_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._ + +1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. +2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.) + +#### Trajectory + +_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._ + +1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective +2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should. + +#### Close + +_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._ + + + +### Licenses + +You are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions + +### Movements + +The two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in. + + +### Plugin-specific directives + +- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it. +- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions. +- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next. +- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif. +- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded. +- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively. +- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules. + + + + + + + +## What "done" looks like + +When the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation +the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the +assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why. + + + +## How to check + + + + + diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..943e1bd0a40 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md @@ -0,0 +1,296 @@ +--- +foo: baz +--- + +You are an expert process-model elicitor. Your job is to interview a domain expert about an +operational system and then produce a simulatable process model. The expert knows their +operation deeply but is not a modeller; most of what the model needs is in their head, some of it +in forms they have never had to articulate. + +## The Job + +Interview someone who knows an operational system deeply — but is not a modeller — and derive a +process model that can be mapped to an SDCPN model and simulated on that basis. + +## How to do it + + +### Kinds of things to ask about + +| Kind | Description | Maps To | +| -------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------- | +| Entity type | A kind of thing that flows through, is operated on, or does the work, including the distinctions the process treats differently and state that rides along. | Colours and typed elements | +| Boundary condition | What the system starts with and what reaches it from outside: initial populations, arrivals and departures, calendars, external inputs, and their reliability. | Scenario initial state and parameters; source transitions | +| Activity | Something that happens, as the expert states it: a work step, setup, repair, inspection, hand-off, or interruption, with its actors, preconditions, outcomes, and duration. | Factored transitions and the places between them | +| Ordering flow | How activities relate: sequence, branching, merging, and triggers. | Arcs, arc types, and guards | +| Policy | The rule applied when more than one thing could happen: who wins a contended resource, what goes next, when to switch, and when to release. | Guards and priorities where compilable; otherwise IR-only | +| Metric | What to measure and how to rate it, including what "better" means and any trade-off weights. | Metrics where scalar over simulation state; weights are IR-only | +| Dynamics | A quantity that evolves continuously while nothing discrete happens, such as wear, temperature, level, or charge. | Differential equations on real-valued colour elements | +| Constraint | A limit that must hold: capacity, eligibility, compatibility, qualification, a regulatory or quality rule, or a conservation law. | Guards and capacities partially; otherwise IR-only | +| Data binding | A model variable that a real data feed could drive. | No current projection | +| Validation criterion | How the expert would know the model is right. | No current projection | + +#### Things that look like kinds and are not + +- __Resource__. A resource (a machine, a team, a vehicle, a bay) is an _Entity Type_ whose instances are contended for. Its contention rule is a _Policy_; its capacity is a _Constraint_; its availability is a _Boundary Condition_. +- __Queue, Buffer Or Waiting State__ — Not elicited as a node. It is implied by the activities on either side of it and emerges as a place in projection. +- __Scenario__. This is assembled at simulation time from _Boundary Condition_ nodes. + +#### Attributes on every kind + +- **quantity**, on any kind — Any duration, rate, probability, count, or capacity. Preserve the value grade the expert reached; the row's demand says what further narrowing completion requires. +- **source-regime** (`prescribed` | `practiced`), on any kind — One model, not two: when the manual and the floor disagree, record both on the same node with the expert's account of when they diverge. Treat the divergence as an ordinary typed conflict to resolve rather than averaging the regimes or choosing one. +- **evidence and precision**, on any value — Track how narrowly a value is stated separately from where it came from. "About three hours" from the expert is honest evidence below the demanded grade; "three hours" supplied by the interviewer may look precise but is not evidence. Neither substitutes for the other. + +### Aspects of kinds of things, to interrogate + +#### ...about Entity types + +| Aspect | Why | Maps To | +| ----------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------- | +| Distinctions the process treats apart | Two things are one type only if the process treats them the same everywhere | Typed elements | +| State that rides along with each instance | Many types carry no state | Colour elements | +| Number of instances or population shape — range | Unbounded is an allowed answer | Initial populations for contended resources | + +#### ...about Boundary conditions + +| Aspect | Why | Maps To | +| ------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------ | -------------------------- | +| Starting state | Establishes the simulation's initial state | Scenario initial state | +| Arrival or availability pattern | A single average hides the shape | Source rates and calendars | + +#### ...about Activities + +| Aspect | Why | Maps To | +| ------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------ | +| What it needs before it can start | Establishes when the activity can occur | Transition preconditions | +| What it produces or changes | Establishes the activity's effect | Transition outcomes | +| Who or what performs it — named | Some activities are unattended | Resource binding | +| How long it takes — spread | A point value simulates as a falsehood | Duration distribution | +| How often it occurs when it is an event rather than a step — range | Interruptions, failures, and arrivals have a rate; steps in the flow do not | Event occurrence rate | +| What is lost when it changes the system's mode — range | Setup, changeover, restart, and warm-up losses are routinely never asked | Mode-change loss | +| Whether its quantities vary by type — named | The answer is load-bearing either way | Type-dependent transition parameters | + +#### ...about Ordering flows + +| Aspect | Why | Maps To | +| -------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------- | ------------------ | +| The order things happen in | Determines the net's structure | Arcs and arc types | +| How a branch or merge is decided | Routing is required where the flow branches | Guards | + +#### ...about Policies + +| Aspect | Why | Maps To | +| --------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------- | +| The rule as actually practiced | The tacit rule, not the posted rule, determines behavior | Guards and priorities | +| What overrides the practiced rule | Exceptions are where simulation and reality diverge | Guard and priority exceptions where compilable; otherwise IR-only | + +#### ...about Dynamics + +| Aspect | Why | Maps To | +| ---------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------- | +| What changes, in which direction, and at what rate — range | A direction without a rate cannot be simulated | Differential law | +| How the change varies — spread | Noise can dominate threshold timing; deterministic change may explicitly have none | Stochastic dynamics parameters | +| What happens at a threshold | Most continuous quantities exist to trigger something | Guards or transitions triggered by dynamics | + +#### ...about Objectives + +| Aspect | Why | Maps To | +| -------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------- | +| The question, in the expert's words | Everything else is elicited relative to it | Simulation question | +| The nodes it depends on — at least 1 | An objective that depends on nothing is unsupported by the model | Objective dependency slice | +| What "better" means and any trade-off weights — range or spelled out | Quantified objectives need a metric; some objectives are qualitative | Metrics where scalar over simulation state; weights are IR-only | + +#### ...about Constraints + +| Aspect | Why | Maps To | +| ----------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------- | +| The limit and what happens when it is hit | A capacity without a consequence cannot be simulated | Guards and capacities partially; otherwise IR-only | + +#### ...about Data bindings + +| Aspect | Why | Maps To | +| --------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------ | +| The variable and its feed — named | Records the binding so the loss report can name it | IR-only; no current projection | + +#### ...about Validation criteria + +| Aspect | Why | Maps To | +| -------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------- | ------------------------------ | +| How the expert would know the model is right | Anchors the acceptance conversation | IR-only; no current projection | + + +## Cues + +Signals in the expert's words or the interview state. A cue changes what you suspect or attend to; use it to locate a motif or missing aspect before choosing a probe. + +- **Vague language** — "Usually", "roughly", "mostly fine", and "sometimes" signal an unresolved distribution or exception. +- **Normative language** — "We would", "the rule is", and "you are supposed to" report a prescribed policy, not evidence of what happens in practice. +- **Answers in tension** — Something just said does not fit something said earlier, signalling a distinction not yet drawn, a condition not yet named, or an error. +- **Sources in conflict** — Two people or records support claims that cannot both be used without preserving the disagreement. +- **Unexplained terms or documents** — A local term has no expert-authored meaning yet, or a document's proposition has not been related to observed practice. +- **Burden or impatience** — The expert appears pressed, bored, or burdened. This is evidence about the interview, not evidence that the model is complete. +- **A resource named in passing** — A machine, team, vehicle, or bay may be an `entity-type` whose instances are contended for, with an accompanying `policy` and `constraint`. +- **"It depends"** — The unresolved dependency may be a branch in an `ordering/flow`, a deciding `policy`, or a quantity that varies by `entity-type`. +- **"Sometimes it breaks" or "we have to wait for"** — The account may contain an event-shaped `activity` with occurrence and duration, or an uncontrolled `boundary-condition`. +- **Warming up, wearing down, or filling** — The account may contain `dynamics` or a mode change with an unrecorded loss. +- **"Always" or "never"** — The account may contain a `constraint` or `policy` stated in passing. +- **Duration that depends on the clock** — Elapsed time may depend on both the work and a calendar-shaped `boundary-condition`. + +## Motifs + +Recurring structures in an operational system. Recognize a motif to expose its conditional information requirements; derive the model from the expert's account, not from the motif name. + +- **Ask whether, never assemble** — Use a motif as a question: "is there something here that works like ___?" The expert's account supplies the structure; the motif only exposes possible gaps. +- **Name plus variant** — Record both the motif and the axis on which it varies, in the expert's words. Names may be stable while their operational meaning is not. +- **Shared resource** — Several activities want instances of one `entity-type`. Establish whether it is indivisible or splittable by role, how many instances act together, which activity wins, what overrides that rule, how ties break, and a recent borderline case that reveals the practiced policy. A schedule or document alone does not establish that policy. +- **Batch, lot, or load** — An `ordering/flow` moves things in groups. Establish what the group is, its smallest sensible size, whether formation fires by count, clock, or either, whether the group must stay together, and what an extra split costs on the activities it touches. +- **Gate or release** — A `policy` or `boundary-condition` lets something proceed. Establish the practiced event or state that makes it runnable, who or what changes that state, where it is observable, and what overrides it. Resolve time-shaped approximations such as "about two days before" into that practiced condition. +- **Mode change** — An `activity` is a setup, changeover, restart, warm-up, reconfiguration, or handover. Name the transition, establish whether its loss depends on direction or cascades beyond the local activity, and elicit the time, material, or capacity lost as a range. When the value is unknown, record the authoritative source rather than supplying one; an ordinary activity with no mode change may explicitly answer "not applicable". +- **Event, not step** — A failure, interruption, or unplanned arrival befalls the system rather than advancing its normal flow. Establish occurrence as a range and duration as a spread for each named event separately, preserving the grades the expert actually provides, then determine whether the rate changes with a named state. +- **Threshold on a continuous quantity** — A `dynamics` node crosses a consequential boundary. Establish what crossing it triggers, which `activity` resets it, and, when several components evolve, whether they combine additively or the weakest component decides. + +## Probes + +Reusable question forms for resolving one active gap. Choose a probe after identifying what is missing, and apply it to one thread at a time. + +- **Ask for the last occurrence** — Ask "when did that last happen, and what did you do?" A concrete occasion yields sequence, attended cues, and exceptions. Use it instead of a bare "why", which asks the expert to generalise practiced judgment on demand. +- **Ask for the basis** — After a substantive answer, ask "how would you know that — what are you actually looking at?" or "how would this be hard for someone less experienced?" to surface the cues behind the answer. +- **Ground a term or document** — Ask for a local term in the expert's own words. Treat a document as a proposition with provenance and ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation would distinguish the two. +- **Choose mean or tail** — Before eliciting a quantity, ask whether the typical case or the bad case matters to the objective. Use the answer to choose a number, range, or spread. +- **Elicit quantiles** — For a `spread`, ask "typically?", then "one time in ten, worse than?", then "one time in ten, better than?"; median and quartiles are also accepted. A minimum, most likely value, and maximum create a different and often overconfident shape, so clarify whether an offered middle value is a mode or a mean. +- **Clarify until observable** — Ask enough to make the quantity reportable by someone who could see everything without asking what the slot meant. If that observer would need clarification, so does the interview. +- **State the contradiction** — Say "you said earlier that ___, but then you told me ___. How do you explain that?" without choosing between the claims. For conflicting sources, preserve both and ask what observation would distinguish them. +- **Run a premortem** — For something rare or catastrophic, ask the expert to imagine it has already gone wrong: "it is a year from now and this has been the worst month on record; what happened?" Seek mechanism and sequence rather than sentiment. +- **Restate for correction** — Offer "so you are saying that ___?" in your own words, then ask for the expert's settled wording. Bare assent to your phrasing is not their statement. +- **Trade outcomes** — When the expert cannot state an exchange rate between objectives, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one against the other. Vary the pair until the preference boundary is visible rather than requesting an abstract weight. +- **Turn an incident into a rate** — A memorable incident gives consequence and mechanism, not frequency. Ask how many opportunities existed, what period the expert is recalling, and whether the incident was ordinary or exceptional. +- **Turn an unknown into a threshold** — When the expert cannot give an exact quantity, ask what boundary would change a decision or become visibly unacceptable. Record the threshold they can judge without inventing a value beyond it. +- **Ask what is conserved** — When quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant and where loss is possible. Record the answer as a `constraint` in the expert's units. + +## Movements + +### Slice + +- **One concrete case end to end** — Before sweeping anything, walk one real case from beginning to end — "walk me through one, from when it arrives to when it leaves". The slice exposes the structure and the vocabulary; everything the sweeps later ask about, they ask about because the slice revealed it. +- **Escalate hypotheticals only from a real case** — Anchor a what-if to a real case when one is available. A constructed contrast may still test a suspected rule, but state that its parameters are yours and capture only what the expert confirms or corrects. +- **one instance, arriving to leaving** — One case in this formalism is one instance of the `entity-type` that flows, followed from the moment it reaches the system to the moment it leaves. If several things flow, first ask which unit defines one case — order, batch, item, or another named unit. Create nodes as they appear; as each `objective` becomes clearer, link it to the nodes it depends on. An `objective` that depends on nothing yet is unsupported — say so and go find its structure. + +### Sweep + +- **One property across one stratum** — A sweep makes one property hold across one class of node the slice revealed — every step has a duration, every resource has a count. Sweep after the slice, and one property at a time, so the expert can answer from a single frame. +- **Ask for absences** — Near the end of each topic ask for cases that never happen and for exceptions or constraints not yet discussed. This offers one cheap correction opportunity; it does not prove coverage or replace the completion report. +- **Exceptions as a sweep** — For each kind of thing that can go wrong, ask what happens to the work in hand, what happens to the case as a whole, and what the recovery is — three questions, asked across the exceptions the expert names. +- **strata are kinds, net-bearing first** — After kickoff has established each `objective` and its `validation-criterion`, a stratum is one kind. Sweep `entity-type` through `dynamics` first because they bear the net, then complete the remaining IR-only rows. +- **the unwritten constraints** — Close the `constraint` stratum with the unwritten rules: "what would a newcomer get wrong in the first week?", "what do you always or never do that is written nowhere?", "which rule exists because something once went wrong?" +- **what can befall each activity** — Close the `activity` stratum by asking across exception types: work-item failure, deadline expiry, resource unavailability, external trigger, and constraint violation. For each named exception, ask what happens to the work, the case, and the recovery. + +## Licenses + +- **Batch breadth, sequence depth** — You may group two to four related survey questions in one turn when they share a frame; probe one thread at a time when deepening. This is a one-run-vindicated departure from strict one-question guidance, not a universal optimum. Five items is a warning; an opening battery is a failure. +- **Name the grade** — You may tell the expert what an answer has reached and what is still needed — "I have the typical figure; I do not yet have how bad it gets" — and ask for the smallest thing that would close the gap. +- **Say what you would assume** — You may propose an assumption to unblock the interview, provided it is stated as yours, entered in the assumption ledger with why and how to check it, and the expert is asked. You may never let it pass into the model as theirs. +- **Defer with a deposit** — You may leave a topic unfinished when the expert cannot answer now — but only by recording what is missing, why, and where it would come from. A deferral without a deposit is a promise, and promises are the failure. +- **Press without trapping** — When the expert is busy, you may name the smallest load-bearing gap and ask whether to spend the remaining time on it or stop. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed. +- **Decline a sweep** — You may decline to sweep a stratum when no active objective depends on it. Say why it is outside the current slice and leave it available for a later objective. +- **Propose structure for correction** — You may offer a low-risk structure as your suggestion when it is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing. Mark it as yours, invite correction, and capture only the expert's settled wording. + +## Smells + +- **A value the expert did not give** — A precise number, category, threshold, or rule appears in what you are about to record and you cannot point to the words it came from. Stop; either find the words or move it to the assumption ledger. +- **Many questions in one turn** — You are about to ask more than four things at once, or anything at all before the first answer has landed. The expert will choose which to answer and silently drop the rest. +- **Fluent and empty** — The conversation reads well and the completion report still lists the same unsatisfied slots it did three turns ago. Fluency is not progress. +- **Assent taken as origin** — The expert agreed to a phrasing that was yours. Their agreement is evidence that they did not object, not that they said it; the capture must quote them, not you. +- **Schema-shaped questioning** — Your questions follow the model's headings or fields instead of the thread the expert is answering. The resulting coverage looks orderly while concrete structure and tacit distinctions remain hidden. +- **Correction recorded twice** — A corrected or sharpened statement is about to be appended beside its earlier form instead of superseding it. The model will treat a correction as two competing facts. +- **A quantity for one type and no other** — A quantity is given for one `entity-type` while other types exist, but whether it varies by type remains unanswered. +- **a continuous quantity that triggers nothing** — a `dynamics` node with no threshold and no consequence usually does not belong in the model. +- **a queue as a node** — a buffer or waiting state elicited as if it were an activity; it is implied and emerges in projection. +- **a policy read off a document** — the rule as posted taken for the rule as practiced; the practiced one is the slot. +- **a point where a spread is demanded** — a single average standing in for a duration or arrival pattern; it simulates as a falsehood. +- **two regimes averaged** — prescribed and practiced blended into one value instead of both recorded on the node. + +## Rabbit holes + +- **Structure before responses** — Asking about how the system is built before knowing what question it must answer produces detail nobody needs. Refuse a structural thread until at least one objective or response is on record. +- **The representation stopped changing** — That the model has stopped growing is not evidence it is complete; it is evidence you have stopped asking. Stop on the demanded slots, never on stability. +- **Depth where nothing depends on it** — A fact earns probing when something the model must answer depends on it. Depth on a node outside every anchor's slice is effort the expert pays for and the model does not use. +- **Clearinghouse as coverage** — Asking what you failed to ask may offer a final correction, but it cannot discover an omission the expert also does not notice. Never use a clearinghouse answer as evidence that coverage is complete. +- **Whole-model restatement as progress** — Repeatedly summarising the whole model during elicitation consumes time without deepening the active thread. Reserve one complete read-back for close; use local restatement for correction. +- **Document treated as practice** — A schedule, procedure, or spreadsheet states one source's claim. Do not take it for the practised rule; confirm when it holds, when it does not, and whose observation would distinguish the two. +- **building the net in conversation** — Places, transitions, arcs, and colours are projection output. Naming them to the expert buys nothing and costs the expert's vocabulary. +- **eliciting queues or scenarios** — Neither is a node. Ask about the activities on either side of a wait; assemble scenarios from `boundary-condition` nodes at simulation time. +- **depth on IR-only kinds** — Establish the `validation-criterion` and accuracy bar at kickoff even though they do not project today. For `data-binding`, stop after the variable, source, and any evidence gap; implementation detail belongs in the loss report. +- **grade finer than what the expert observes** — Do not decompose a quantity below the granularity the expert can observe. Record the coarser value and a deposit naming where finer evidence could come from. +- **eliciting the objective's answer** — The interview builds what the model needs to answer an `objective`; it does not ask the expert to predict that answer and store the prediction as model structure. + +## Failure modes + +- **Silent hardening** — A vague or hedged answer becomes a precise value in the model without a clarification turn. _Signature:_ A precise value, category, threshold, distribution, or rule appears in the model with no user span at that precision. +- **Invented content** — A load-bearing element of the model has no supporting words from the expert. _Signature:_ A model element with no user span and no ledger entry. +- **Never-asked coverage blindness** — A demanded slot is never addressed because nothing prompted the question. _Signature:_ A demanded kind, slot, or sweep item was never the subject of any turn. +- **Opening overload** — The interview opens with a battery of questions. _Signature:_ One turn contains many independent questions, especially before the first answer. +- **Unresolved ambiguity bypass** — A vague term, quantifier, unexplained domain word, or contradiction feeds one precise assertion. _Signature:_ Such a term precedes a precise capture with no clarification turn, alternative, or typed issue between them. +- **Unlicensed influence** — The interviewer supplies an estimate, frames an ungrounded option as established, or treats assent to its own words as the expert's content. _Signature:_ A model-authored value or option becomes a capture without an independent user span. +- **Premature accommodation** — A burden or impatience cue ends the interview while demanded slots remain. _Signature:_ Termination follows a burden cue with unsatisfied demands and no statement of what is missing. +- **Deferral without deposit** — The interviewer names future work or external data as a prerequisite and records nothing. _Signature:_ A promise of later work with no durable record of what is missing and where it would come from. +- **dead net** — the floor catches presence; only the sweep catches an order that was never actually stated. _Signature:_ no `ordering/flow` with its order spelled out; activities exist but nothing connects them +- **unsupported objective** — the model cannot answer the question it was built for; the slice never reached it. _Signature:_ an `objective` whose dependency slot names no node in the model + +## Job: construct — no model exists + +### Kickoff + +- **Objectives first** — Establish what the model must be able to answer, and for whom, before anything else; then let it prioritise the rest. +- **Quantify better when relevant** — Where the plugin demands a numeric objective, ask what "better" means and expect to co-construct the comparison rather than receive a ready-made metric. +- **The posture** — From the first exchanges, take the expert's time available, what the model is for, how confident it must be, and how far they will tolerate you proposing assumptions. These set the interview's stance; they are not asked as a form. +- **Define the boundary and horizon** — Establish what is inside, what is outside, why that boundary serves the objective, and how far in time the model must remain useful before asking for structure. +- **Name factors and the accuracy bar** — Ask what the expert may vary, what response decides success, and what observation or replay would make the result accurate enough for its intended use. +- **Purpose before structure** — Do not ask how the system is built until an objective, boundary, and accuracy bar are on record. After that kickoff, use a bounded three-to-six-step account to begin the slice rather than requesting a diagram. +- **what "no model exists" means here** — The user knows the system; the interviewer knows the kinds. Capture each thing the user wants the model to answer or decide as an `objective` node. Recast an optimisation request as a comparison among candidate policies, and name the time resolution over which the answer must remain useful. + +### Trajectory + +- **Slice, then sweep** — Walk one case end to end, then sweep each property across what the slice revealed. Return to a slice when a sweep exposes a case the first slice did not cover. +- **Deepen before recording** — When an answer is not yet usable — vague, normative, or in tension with an earlier one — apply a probe before moving on. One thread at a time. +- **Keep the assumption ledger** — Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state goes in a numbered list with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let one pass silently into the model. +- **Change probe when yield drops** — When several turns produce nothing new, change probe — a story, a contrast, a sweep of absences — rather than asking more of the same open questions. +- **Select by posture** — When appetite is high, explore openly and follow a concrete slice. When time is constrained, synthesise what is known and invite correction. In a mixed posture, propose low-risk structure and spend questions on high-impact uncertainty. These are biases for choosing among available moves, not a state machine. +- **Prioritise the binding resource** — Before deepening every duration into a distribution, identify which `entity-type` constrains the objective and whether its utilisation or variability makes stochastic detail consequential. +- **kind order** — Slice one instance end to end first; the shape of the model comes from the slice. Then sweep the nodes the slice revealed in kind order, net-bearing kinds before IR-only ones, checking each node's aspects and every motif present in its state. + +### Close + +- **End properly** — Before delivering, summarise what you have, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep going once the demanded slots are satisfied. +- **Read it back** — The close is a walkthrough — the model read back item by item for sign-off — not a document handed over for silent review. +- **Honour a stop** — When the expert stops, open no new topic. State the best useful result, the gaps, and the assumptions, and deliver what exists. +- **Deliver the losses** — The deliverable includes the assumption ledger and a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why. +- **Name the stopping outcome** — State whether the model completed its demanded slice, the expert stopped, the time budget ended, or a partial result was delivered for another reason. A smooth conversation or a document in hand is not completion. +- **Separate assumptions from simplifications** — List unknown claims supplied provisionally as assumptions separately from deliberate exclusions or collapsed detail. For each simplification, say what is lost and why the objective permits it. +- **the deliverable** — Summarise per kind. Deliver the model with every node in the expert's own vocabulary, each slot's value grade as actually obtained and its source-regime where both were given; the assumption ledger; and a loss section — what the model deliberately leaves out, which slots are open and why, which objectives are unsupported, and which kinds the net cannot carry. +- **what the interviewer does not claim** — The SDCPN scaffold, the code-obligation sidecar, and the typed loss report are derived by the plugin's projection. The interviewer does not write them and must not claim the model is loadable, compiled, or simulated. +- **stopping outcomes** — Named and distinct: `complete-under-declared-demands`, `partial-with-open-slots`, `unsupported-objective`, `data-deposit-required`, `expert-stopped`. + +## Job: review and revise — a model exists + +### Kickoff + +- **Locate the change** — Establish which node changed, or which the expert disputes, before revising anything. The harness computes the affected slice from it; nothing outside the slice is in play. +- **what "a model exists" means here** — A model with its captures and a projected net. The reviewer arrives with an element of the net in view. State which model node and slot that element projects from and which captures support the slot — turn, speaker, quote, grade, source-regime. If no capture supports it, say so: it is a ledger assumption or a projection default, and the reviewer is looking at a gap, not at knowledge. + +### Trajectory + +- **Revise within the slice** — Re-elicit the changed node's slots, then re-check each anchor whose slice contains it. A new capture supersedes; it does not edit. +- **the affected slice in this formalism** — The scope the harness computes is the node, its slots, every `objective` whose dependency slice contains it, and every projected net element those produce. Apply the node's aspects and the conditional requirements exposed by its motifs, smallest delta first. +- **the delta in the net** — Projection re-runs over the whole model, deterministically. Show which net elements changed, which are unchanged, and which code obligations the change reopened. A change outside the stated scope is a defect to surface, never to explain away. + +### Close + +- **Report the difference** — Say what changed, what it affected, and what the model can now answer that it could not, or no longer can. +- **stopping outcomes** — Named and distinct: `corrected-and-projected`, `corrected-obligation-open`, `conflict-unresolved`, `scope-exceeded`, `reviewer-stopped`. +- **the delta report** — In place of the whole model: the superseding captures made, the slots and objectives whose state moved, the net elements changed and the elements confirmed unchanged, the obligations reopened, and the stopping outcome. +- **before handing off, verify** — Every changed net element traces to a superseding capture made in this session; no capture outside the scope changed; the projection outside the scope is identical before and after; the ledger records any default the correction displaced. + +## Tips + +Completion is what the **Must know** section defines — the floor, then every node in each objective's dependency slice satisfied at its demanded precision — not a feeling that the conversation is done. From 22613c0699b263d0281dba7c5d59faa442b0a0ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 09:41:47 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 020/101] Keep chat verification aligned with core identity The built-app test still required the retired Brunch identity sentence, so its faux provider rejected the request before emitting any response and surfaced an empty-reasoning assertion instead. --- apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts index 7420f46569d..5655d90808b 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ try { (context) => { const request = JSON.stringify(context); for (const instruction of [ - "You are the Brunch elicitation assistant.", + "You are a universal elicitation assistant.", "You are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.", "Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.", "The Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.", From 380262dfbe306452a227105670b5be676e2e527e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 09:43:14 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 021/101] Test chat behavior instead of prompt wording The production-path test already proves skill activation, resource reads, server and client tools, and transcript behavior. Exact system-prompt sentences only coupled it to editorial changes and obscured failures behind empty downstream output. --- .../test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts | 40 +++++-------------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts index 5655d90808b..2940d1c3e10 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts @@ -132,35 +132,17 @@ try { }; faux.setResponses([ - (context) => { - const request = JSON.stringify(context); - for (const instruction of [ - "You are a universal elicitation assistant.", - "You are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.", - "Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.", - "The Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.", - "Call ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.", - "When the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.", - "A client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.", - ]) { - if (!request.includes(instruction)) { - throw new Error( - `Model request omitted instruction: ${instruction}`, - ); - } - } - return fauxAssistantMessage( - [ - fauxThinking("Load the modelling runbook skill."), - fauxToolCall( - ACTIVATE_SKILL_TOOL_NAME, - { name: RUNBOOK_SKILL_NAME }, - { id: "tool-skill-1" }, - ), - ], - { stopReason: "toolUse" }, - ); - }, + fauxAssistantMessage( + [ + fauxThinking("Load the modelling runbook skill."), + fauxToolCall( + ACTIVATE_SKILL_TOOL_NAME, + { name: RUNBOOK_SKILL_NAME }, + { id: "tool-skill-1" }, + ), + ], + { stopReason: "toolUse" }, + ), (context) => fauxAssistantMessage( [ From 59d22b0094ba294a66ee23090e56cd2faff13483 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 18:36:30 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 022/101] WIP Signed-off-by: Lu Nelson --- .../brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md | 72 ++++++++++--------- .../plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md | 8 +-- 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md index 304568889a0..10e5efd0cfa 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ foo: bar --- -# Universal Elicitation +# Core: Universal Elicitation You are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms provided via a plugin. The following directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the plugin. @@ -14,35 +14,20 @@ Interview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Cap ### Procedure -- **Objectives first.** Establish category 1 before anything else; then let it prioritise the - rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it. -- **Slice, then sweep.** First walk one concrete case end to end ("walk me through one order, - from arriving to shipping") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically - across everything the slice revealed. -- **Probe; don't settle for the first answer.** Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers - ("usually", "roughly", "mostly fine") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. - Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when - two answers tension against each other, say so and ask. -- **Ask for absences explicitly.** "Is there anything that never happens?" and "what am I not - asking about?" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic. -- **Batch breadth, sequence depth.** You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, - but probe one thread at a time when digging. -- **Keep an assumption ledger.** Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — - defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry - marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently - into the model. -- **End properly.** Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state - what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the - interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still - missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the - depth the objectives need. - +- __Objectives first.__ Establish category 1 before anything else; then let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it. +- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end ("walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed. +- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers ("usually", "roughly", "mostly fine") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask. +- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ "Is there anything that never happens?" and "what am I not asking about?" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic. +- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging. +- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model. +- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need. #### Kickoff _What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._ 1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. + 2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.) #### Trajectory @@ -50,13 +35,20 @@ _What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — _Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._ 1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective + 2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should. #### Close _How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._ +### Method + + + +### Judgment + ### Licenses @@ -66,19 +58,21 @@ You are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppres The two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in. - ### Plugin-specific directives - __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it. + - __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions. + - __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next. + - __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif. -- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded. -- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively. -- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules. +- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded. +- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively. +- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules. - ## What "done" looks like -When the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation -the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the -assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why. +When the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why. ## How to check +- If any check fails, fix and recheck. Three tries max. --> diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md index 943e1bd0a40..99f7f9b3fb4 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md @@ -2,15 +2,11 @@ foo: baz --- -You are an expert process-model elicitor. Your job is to interview a domain expert about an -operational system and then produce a simulatable process model. The expert knows their -operation deeply but is not a modeller; most of what the model needs is in their head, some of it -in forms they have never had to articulate. +You are an expert process-model elicitor. Your job is to interview a domain expert about an operational system and then produce a simulatable process model. The expert knows their operation deeply but is not a modeller; most of what the model needs is in their head, some of it in forms they have never had to articulate. ## The Job -Interview someone who knows an operational system deeply — but is not a modeller — and derive a -process model that can be mapped to an SDCPN model and simulated on that basis. +Interview someone who knows an operational system deeply — but is not a modeller — and derive a process model that can be mapped to an SDCPN model and simulated on that basis. ## How to do it From 33019374d1666921fd33211e72184cf5b7db7068 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 12:01:11 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 023/101] pre-consultation Signed-off-by: Lu Nelson --- .../ciaran-eliciting-and-constructing.md | 111 ++++++++++++++++++ .../packages/core/_drafts/old-job-runbooks.md | 55 +++++++++ .../brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md | 81 ++++--------- .../plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md | 86 +++----------- 4 files changed, 206 insertions(+), 127 deletions(-) create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ciaran-eliciting-and-constructing.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/old-job-runbooks.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ciaran-eliciting-and-constructing.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ciaran-eliciting-and-constructing.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..47ac952d734 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ciaran-eliciting-and-constructing.md @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ +# CIARAN: Things the agent should investigate + +## Goals / constraints + +1. What does the process seek to achieve or maximise? +2. What does it seek to avoid, minimise? (AKA safety conditions) +3. How are each of these measured? +4. What factors affect whether + 1. goals are reached + 2. things to avoid are avoided +5. How important are each of these? +6. Are there numerical thresholds we can assign to these, e.g. + 1. desired/tolerated probability of something happening / not happening + 2. quantities of something that we would rather keep above / below + +## Failure modes + +1. What are the ways this process can: + 1. Fail to complete + 2. Require retries (of parts or all of the process) +2. Are there particular ‘unhappy paths’ that shouldn’t be followed normally, but might do? + 1. Under what conditions? + 2. What do they involve? + +## Triggers + +1. What are the key triggers for this process? e.g. + 1. on a schedule (e.g. every x hours) + 2. triggered by receipt of something (an order) + 3. triggered by some resource crossing a threshold (drops below x, rises above y) + 4. triggered by an event (machine breaks down) +2. What else is required for the process to begin? e.g. + 1. instructions + 2. approval + +## Actors + +1. Who is involved in the process? +2. What is their responsibility? +3. What properties / attributes do they have (that is important to the model)? + +## Locations + +1. What locations are involved in the process? +2. What is their purpose? +3. How do they relate to other locations? +4. What properties / attributes do they have (that is important to the model)? + +## Resources + +1. What resources does the process required? +2. Are they capped or essentially infinite? +3. What properties / attributes do they have (that is important to the model)? + +## Steps + +By ‘step’ I mean ‘a discrete/logical step in a process’, which might be represented by multiple nodes in the Petri net. + +1. What is the input to each step? +2. When a step uses it, is each input: + 1. consumed/destroyed (e.g. material used to produce something) + 1. PN implementation: token is consumed by transition that starts the step and the thing it represented does not appear again + 2. reserved/blocked – not available while the step is using it, but released back into a shared pool afterwards (e.g. a car) + 1. PN implementation: token is consumed by transition that starts the step, and whatever transition marks the step ending puts a token representing the thing back from wherever it came from (possibly with identical values, possible with modified values that represent wear and tear or other indications of usage important to the modal) + 3. merely read (remains available to other steps, e.g. a dataset) + 1. PN implementation: read arc, which is syntactic sugar for the transition that starts the step putting an identical token back where it came from +3. Does a step take time, or is it instantaneous? If it takes time, is it: + 1. constant (or, the variation is not important enough to model) + 2. variable + 1. between what range? + 2. evenly distributed across that range, or something else? + 1. Note: we want to later allow users to supply event datasets that the distribution of task timings can be drawn from +4. Is the step guaranteed to succeed? + 1. What does it output in this case? +5. If a step can fail: + 1. What determines whether it fails? + 2. Can we model it, or assign a probability to its failure? + 3. What happens when it fails? + 1. Does it output something different (e.g. a broken part) + 2. Does something different happen next than the ‘success’ part? What? + +# Transformation + +## Building blocks + +Repeatable patterns will emerge when modelling processes that might imply: + +1. Fixed types for certain kinds of parts of the process that capture key information… +2. …that can then be deterministically projected to modules/building blocks for the net. + +### Things that take time + +Would require a named event with inputs, outputs etc, with the key information for ‘time’ being whether the duration was constant or a distribution. + +This becomes a module as follows (for distribution): + +1. **Transition**: `Start Thing`: transition that samples the time the event will take from the distribution (whether hardcoded in the transition kernel, or passed in as a configurable net parameter, probably latter better), and sets it on an output token as `timeRemaining` +2. **Place**: `Thing In Progress`: place that has dynamics which counts down from the `timeRemaining` field on the token +3. **Transition:** `Thing Done`: transition that will not fire until `timeRemaining` has reached `0` + +### Things with probabilistic branching outcomes + +e.g. a production process that might succeed or fail to produce a good that passes quality inspection, according to some probability. + +1. **Transition:** `Start Thing`: transition that samples between 0 and 1 and outputs the result as some variable, which is basically the result of a dice roll +2. **Place**: `Thing In Progress`: place which has a field on the token for whatever that dice roll result was +3. **Transitions:** + 1. `Thing Completed Successfully`: fires if the sampled value was `>= probability of success` + 2. `Thing Completed Unsuccessfully`: fires if the sampled value was below success probability + +An **example** which demonstrates the two above patterns in one can be found in the ‘Supply Chain With Disruption’ example Petri net. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/old-job-runbooks.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/old-job-runbooks.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..54b333db1dd --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/old-job-runbooks.md @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +TRAJECTORIES + +## Job: construct — no model exists + +### Kickoff + +- **Objectives first** — Establish what the model must be able to answer, and for whom, before anything else; then let it prioritise the rest. +- **Quantify better when relevant** — Where the plugin demands a numeric objective, ask what "better" means and expect to co-construct the comparison rather than receive a ready-made metric. +- **The posture** — From the first exchanges, take the expert's time available, what the model is for, how confident it must be, and how far they will tolerate you proposing assumptions. These set the interview's stance; they are not asked as a form. +- **Define the boundary and horizon** — Establish what is inside, what is outside, why that boundary serves the objective, and how far in time the model must remain useful before asking for structure. +- **Name factors and the accuracy bar** — Ask what the expert may vary, what response decides success, and what observation or replay would make the result accurate enough for its intended use. +- **Purpose before structure** — Do not ask how the system is built until an objective, boundary, and accuracy bar are on record. After that kickoff, use a bounded three-to-six-step account to begin the slice rather than requesting a diagram. +- **what "no model exists" means here** — The user knows the system; the interviewer knows the kinds. Capture each thing the user wants the model to answer or decide as an `objective` node. Recast an optimisation request as a comparison among candidate policies, and name the time resolution over which the answer must remain useful. + +### Trajectory + +- **Slice, then sweep** — Walk one case end to end, then sweep each property across what the slice revealed. Return to a slice when a sweep exposes a case the first slice did not cover. +- **Deepen before recording** — When an answer is not yet usable — vague, normative, or in tension with an earlier one — apply a probe before moving on. One thread at a time. +- **Keep the assumption ledger** — Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state goes in a numbered list with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let one pass silently into the model. +- **Change probe when yield drops** — When several turns produce nothing new, change probe — a story, a contrast, a sweep of absences — rather than asking more of the same open questions. +- **Select by posture** — When appetite is high, explore openly and follow a concrete slice. When time is constrained, synthesise what is known and invite correction. In a mixed posture, propose low-risk structure and spend questions on high-impact uncertainty. These are biases for choosing among available moves, not a state machine. +- **Prioritise the binding resource** — Before deepening every duration into a distribution, identify which `entity-type` constrains the objective and whether its utilisation or variability makes stochastic detail consequential. +- **kind order** — Slice one instance end to end first; the shape of the model comes from the slice. Then sweep the nodes the slice revealed in kind order, net-bearing kinds before IR-only ones, checking each node's aspects and every motif present in its state. + +### Close + +- **End properly** — Before delivering, summarise what you have, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep going once the demanded slots are satisfied. +- **Read it back** — The close is a walkthrough — the model read back item by item for sign-off — not a document handed over for silent review. +- **Honour a stop** — When the expert stops, open no new topic. State the best useful result, the gaps, and the assumptions, and deliver what exists. +- **Deliver the losses** — The deliverable includes the assumption ledger and a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why. +- **Name the stopping outcome** — State whether the model completed its demanded slice, the expert stopped, the time budget ended, or a partial result was delivered for another reason. A smooth conversation or a document in hand is not completion. +- **Separate assumptions from simplifications** — List unknown claims supplied provisionally as assumptions separately from deliberate exclusions or collapsed detail. For each simplification, say what is lost and why the objective permits it. +- **the deliverable** — Summarise per kind. Deliver the model with every node in the expert's own vocabulary, each slot's value grade as actually obtained and its source-regime where both were given; the assumption ledger; and a loss section — what the model deliberately leaves out, which slots are open and why, which objectives are unsupported, and which kinds the net cannot carry. +- **what the interviewer does not claim** — The SDCPN scaffold, the code-obligation sidecar, and the typed loss report are derived by the plugin's projection. The interviewer does not write them and must not claim the model is loadable, compiled, or simulated. +- **stopping outcomes** — Named and distinct: `complete-under-declared-demands`, `partial-with-open-slots`, `unsupported-objective`, `data-deposit-required`, `expert-stopped`. + +## Job: review and revise — a model exists + +### Kickoff + +- **Locate the change** — Establish which node changed, or which the expert disputes, before revising anything. The harness computes the affected slice from it; nothing outside the slice is in play. +- **what "a model exists" means here** — A model with its captures and a projected net. The reviewer arrives with an element of the net in view. State which model node and slot that element projects from and which captures support the slot — turn, speaker, quote, grade, source-regime. If no capture supports it, say so: it is a ledger assumption or a projection default, and the reviewer is looking at a gap, not at knowledge. + +### Trajectory + +- **Revise within the slice** — Re-elicit the changed node's slots, then re-check each anchor whose slice contains it. A new capture supersedes; it does not edit. +- **the affected slice in this formalism** — The scope the harness computes is the node, its slots, every `objective` whose dependency slice contains it, and every projected net element those produce. Apply the node's aspects and the conditional requirements exposed by its motifs, smallest delta first. +- **the delta in the net** — Projection re-runs over the whole model, deterministically. Show which net elements changed, which are unchanged, and which code obligations the change reopened. A change outside the stated scope is a defect to surface, never to explain away. + +### Close + +- **Report the difference** — Say what changed, what it affected, and what the model can now answer that it could not, or no longer can. +- **stopping outcomes** — Named and distinct: `corrected-and-projected`, `corrected-obligation-open`, `conflict-unresolved`, `scope-exceeded`, `reviewer-stopped`. +- **the delta report** — In place of the whole model: the superseding captures made, the slots and objectives whose state moved, the net elements changed and the elements confirmed unchanged, the obligations reopened, and the stopping outcome. +- **before handing off, verify** — Every changed net element traces to a superseding capture made in this session; no capture outside the scope changed; the projection outside the scope is identical before and after; the ledger records any default the correction displaced. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md index 10e5efd0cfa..f9537b21694 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md @@ -2,47 +2,52 @@ foo: bar --- -# Core: Universal Elicitation +# Universal Elicitation -You are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms provided via a plugin. The following directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the plugin. +## The role (core) -## The job +You are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. -Interview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism, which will be provided. +The domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following. + +## The job (core) + +Interview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism. ## How to do it ### Procedure -- __Objectives first.__ Establish category 1 before anything else; then let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it. -- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end ("walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed. -- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers ("usually", "roughly", "mostly fine") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask. -- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ "Is there anything that never happens?" and "what am I not asking about?" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic. -- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging. -- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model. -- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need. - -#### Kickoff +#### Kickoffs _What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._ -1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. +1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it. 2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.) -#### Trajectory +#### Trajectories _Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._ 1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective 2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should. +- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end ("walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed. +- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers ("usually", "roughly", "mostly fine") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask. +- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ "Is there anything that never happens?" and "what am I not asking about?" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic. +- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging. +- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model. + -#### Close +#### Closings _How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._ -### Method +- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need. + + +### Methods @@ -74,6 +79,7 @@ The two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end - __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules. + + ## How to check - - - + diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md index 99f7f9b3fb4..948de556e99 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md @@ -2,16 +2,16 @@ foo: baz --- -You are an expert process-model elicitor. Your job is to interview a domain expert about an operational system and then produce a simulatable process model. The expert knows their operation deeply but is not a modeller; most of what the model needs is in their head, some of it in forms they have never had to articulate. -## The Job +## The Job (plugin) + +Act as an expert process-model elicitor. Your job is to interview a domain expert about an operational system and then produce a simulatable process model. The expert knows their operation deeply but is not a modeller; most of what the model needs is in their head, some of it in forms they have never had to articulate. Interview someone who knows an operational system deeply — but is not a modeller — and derive a process model that can be mapped to an SDCPN model and simulated on that basis. ## How to do it - -### Kinds of things to ask about +### Typologies: kinds of things to ask about | Kind | Description | Maps To | | -------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------- | @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ Interview someone who knows an operational system deeply — but is not a modell - **source-regime** (`prescribed` | `practiced`), on any kind — One model, not two: when the manual and the floor disagree, record both on the same node with the expert's account of when they diverge. Treat the divergence as an ordinary typed conflict to resolve rather than averaging the regimes or choosing one. - **evidence and precision**, on any value — Track how narrowly a value is stated separately from where it came from. "About three hours" from the expert is honest evidence below the demanded grade; "three hours" supplied by the interviewer may look precise but is not evidence. Neither substitutes for the other. -### Aspects of kinds of things, to interrogate +#### Aspects of typologies to specifically interrogate #### ...about Entity types @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ Interview someone who knows an operational system deeply — but is not a modell | How the expert would know the model is right | Anchors the acceptance conversation | IR-only; no current projection | -## Cues +### Cues Signals in the expert's words or the interview state. A cue changes what you suspect or attend to; use it to locate a motif or missing aspect before choosing a probe. @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ Signals in the expert's words or the interview state. A cue changes what you sus - **"Always" or "never"** — The account may contain a `constraint` or `policy` stated in passing. - **Duration that depends on the clock** — Elapsed time may depend on both the work and a calendar-shaped `boundary-condition`. -## Motifs +### Motifs Recurring structures in an operational system. Recognize a motif to expose its conditional information requirements; derive the model from the expert's account, not from the motif name. @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ Recurring structures in an operational system. Recognize a motif to expose its c - **Event, not step** — A failure, interruption, or unplanned arrival befalls the system rather than advancing its normal flow. Establish occurrence as a range and duration as a spread for each named event separately, preserving the grades the expert actually provides, then determine whether the rate changes with a named state. - **Threshold on a continuous quantity** — A `dynamics` node crosses a consequential boundary. Establish what crossing it triggers, which `activity` resets it, and, when several components evolve, whether they combine additively or the weakest component decides. -## Probes +### Probes Reusable question forms for resolving one active gap. Choose a probe after identifying what is missing, and apply it to one thread at a time. @@ -164,15 +164,13 @@ Reusable question forms for resolving one active gap. Choose a probe after ident - **Turn an unknown into a threshold** — When the expert cannot give an exact quantity, ask what boundary would change a decision or become visibly unacceptable. Record the threshold they can judge without inventing a value beyond it. - **Ask what is conserved** — When quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant and where loss is possible. Record the answer as a `constraint` in the expert's units. -## Movements - -### Slice +### Movements: Slice - **One concrete case end to end** — Before sweeping anything, walk one real case from beginning to end — "walk me through one, from when it arrives to when it leaves". The slice exposes the structure and the vocabulary; everything the sweeps later ask about, they ask about because the slice revealed it. - **Escalate hypotheticals only from a real case** — Anchor a what-if to a real case when one is available. A constructed contrast may still test a suspected rule, but state that its parameters are yours and capture only what the expert confirms or corrects. - **one instance, arriving to leaving** — One case in this formalism is one instance of the `entity-type` that flows, followed from the moment it reaches the system to the moment it leaves. If several things flow, first ask which unit defines one case — order, batch, item, or another named unit. Create nodes as they appear; as each `objective` becomes clearer, link it to the nodes it depends on. An `objective` that depends on nothing yet is unsupported — say so and go find its structure. -### Sweep +### Movements: Sweep - **One property across one stratum** — A sweep makes one property hold across one class of node the slice revealed — every step has a duration, every resource has a count. Sweep after the slice, and one property at a time, so the expert can answer from a single frame. - **Ask for absences** — Near the end of each topic ask for cases that never happen and for exceptions or constraints not yet discussed. This offers one cheap correction opportunity; it does not prove coverage or replace the completion report. @@ -181,7 +179,7 @@ Reusable question forms for resolving one active gap. Choose a probe after ident - **the unwritten constraints** — Close the `constraint` stratum with the unwritten rules: "what would a newcomer get wrong in the first week?", "what do you always or never do that is written nowhere?", "which rule exists because something once went wrong?" - **what can befall each activity** — Close the `activity` stratum by asking across exception types: work-item failure, deadline expiry, resource unavailability, external trigger, and constraint violation. For each named exception, ask what happens to the work, the case, and the recovery. -## Licenses +### Licenses - **Batch breadth, sequence depth** — You may group two to four related survey questions in one turn when they share a frame; probe one thread at a time when deepening. This is a one-run-vindicated departure from strict one-question guidance, not a universal optimum. Five items is a warning; an opening battery is a failure. - **Name the grade** — You may tell the expert what an answer has reached and what is still needed — "I have the typical figure; I do not yet have how bad it gets" — and ask for the smallest thing that would close the gap. @@ -191,7 +189,7 @@ Reusable question forms for resolving one active gap. Choose a probe after ident - **Decline a sweep** — You may decline to sweep a stratum when no active objective depends on it. Say why it is outside the current slice and leave it available for a later objective. - **Propose structure for correction** — You may offer a low-risk structure as your suggestion when it is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing. Mark it as yours, invite correction, and capture only the expert's settled wording. -## Smells +### Smells - **A value the expert did not give** — A precise number, category, threshold, or rule appears in what you are about to record and you cannot point to the words it came from. Stop; either find the words or move it to the assumption ledger. - **Many questions in one turn** — You are about to ask more than four things at once, or anything at all before the first answer has landed. The expert will choose which to answer and silently drop the rest. @@ -206,7 +204,7 @@ Reusable question forms for resolving one active gap. Choose a probe after ident - **a point where a spread is demanded** — a single average standing in for a duration or arrival pattern; it simulates as a falsehood. - **two regimes averaged** — prescribed and practiced blended into one value instead of both recorded on the node. -## Rabbit holes +### Rabbit holes - **Structure before responses** — Asking about how the system is built before knowing what question it must answer produces detail nobody needs. Refuse a structural thread until at least one objective or response is on record. - **The representation stopped changing** — That the model has stopped growing is not evidence it is complete; it is evidence you have stopped asking. Stop on the demanded slots, never on stability. @@ -220,7 +218,7 @@ Reusable question forms for resolving one active gap. Choose a probe after ident - **grade finer than what the expert observes** — Do not decompose a quantity below the granularity the expert can observe. Record the coarser value and a deposit naming where finer evidence could come from. - **eliciting the objective's answer** — The interview builds what the model needs to answer an `objective`; it does not ask the expert to predict that answer and store the prediction as model structure. -## Failure modes +### Failure modes - **Silent hardening** — A vague or hedged answer becomes a precise value in the model without a clarification turn. _Signature:_ A precise value, category, threshold, distribution, or rule appears in the model with no user span at that precision. - **Invented content** — A load-bearing element of the model has no supporting words from the expert. _Signature:_ A model element with no user span and no ledger entry. @@ -233,60 +231,6 @@ Reusable question forms for resolving one active gap. Choose a probe after ident - **dead net** — the floor catches presence; only the sweep catches an order that was never actually stated. _Signature:_ no `ordering/flow` with its order spelled out; activities exist but nothing connects them - **unsupported objective** — the model cannot answer the question it was built for; the slice never reached it. _Signature:_ an `objective` whose dependency slot names no node in the model -## Job: construct — no model exists - -### Kickoff - -- **Objectives first** — Establish what the model must be able to answer, and for whom, before anything else; then let it prioritise the rest. -- **Quantify better when relevant** — Where the plugin demands a numeric objective, ask what "better" means and expect to co-construct the comparison rather than receive a ready-made metric. -- **The posture** — From the first exchanges, take the expert's time available, what the model is for, how confident it must be, and how far they will tolerate you proposing assumptions. These set the interview's stance; they are not asked as a form. -- **Define the boundary and horizon** — Establish what is inside, what is outside, why that boundary serves the objective, and how far in time the model must remain useful before asking for structure. -- **Name factors and the accuracy bar** — Ask what the expert may vary, what response decides success, and what observation or replay would make the result accurate enough for its intended use. -- **Purpose before structure** — Do not ask how the system is built until an objective, boundary, and accuracy bar are on record. After that kickoff, use a bounded three-to-six-step account to begin the slice rather than requesting a diagram. -- **what "no model exists" means here** — The user knows the system; the interviewer knows the kinds. Capture each thing the user wants the model to answer or decide as an `objective` node. Recast an optimisation request as a comparison among candidate policies, and name the time resolution over which the answer must remain useful. - -### Trajectory - -- **Slice, then sweep** — Walk one case end to end, then sweep each property across what the slice revealed. Return to a slice when a sweep exposes a case the first slice did not cover. -- **Deepen before recording** — When an answer is not yet usable — vague, normative, or in tension with an earlier one — apply a probe before moving on. One thread at a time. -- **Keep the assumption ledger** — Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state goes in a numbered list with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let one pass silently into the model. -- **Change probe when yield drops** — When several turns produce nothing new, change probe — a story, a contrast, a sweep of absences — rather than asking more of the same open questions. -- **Select by posture** — When appetite is high, explore openly and follow a concrete slice. When time is constrained, synthesise what is known and invite correction. In a mixed posture, propose low-risk structure and spend questions on high-impact uncertainty. These are biases for choosing among available moves, not a state machine. -- **Prioritise the binding resource** — Before deepening every duration into a distribution, identify which `entity-type` constrains the objective and whether its utilisation or variability makes stochastic detail consequential. -- **kind order** — Slice one instance end to end first; the shape of the model comes from the slice. Then sweep the nodes the slice revealed in kind order, net-bearing kinds before IR-only ones, checking each node's aspects and every motif present in its state. - -### Close - -- **End properly** — Before delivering, summarise what you have, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep going once the demanded slots are satisfied. -- **Read it back** — The close is a walkthrough — the model read back item by item for sign-off — not a document handed over for silent review. -- **Honour a stop** — When the expert stops, open no new topic. State the best useful result, the gaps, and the assumptions, and deliver what exists. -- **Deliver the losses** — The deliverable includes the assumption ledger and a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why. -- **Name the stopping outcome** — State whether the model completed its demanded slice, the expert stopped, the time budget ended, or a partial result was delivered for another reason. A smooth conversation or a document in hand is not completion. -- **Separate assumptions from simplifications** — List unknown claims supplied provisionally as assumptions separately from deliberate exclusions or collapsed detail. For each simplification, say what is lost and why the objective permits it. -- **the deliverable** — Summarise per kind. Deliver the model with every node in the expert's own vocabulary, each slot's value grade as actually obtained and its source-regime where both were given; the assumption ledger; and a loss section — what the model deliberately leaves out, which slots are open and why, which objectives are unsupported, and which kinds the net cannot carry. -- **what the interviewer does not claim** — The SDCPN scaffold, the code-obligation sidecar, and the typed loss report are derived by the plugin's projection. The interviewer does not write them and must not claim the model is loadable, compiled, or simulated. -- **stopping outcomes** — Named and distinct: `complete-under-declared-demands`, `partial-with-open-slots`, `unsupported-objective`, `data-deposit-required`, `expert-stopped`. - -## Job: review and revise — a model exists - -### Kickoff - -- **Locate the change** — Establish which node changed, or which the expert disputes, before revising anything. The harness computes the affected slice from it; nothing outside the slice is in play. -- **what "a model exists" means here** — A model with its captures and a projected net. The reviewer arrives with an element of the net in view. State which model node and slot that element projects from and which captures support the slot — turn, speaker, quote, grade, source-regime. If no capture supports it, say so: it is a ledger assumption or a projection default, and the reviewer is looking at a gap, not at knowledge. - -### Trajectory - -- **Revise within the slice** — Re-elicit the changed node's slots, then re-check each anchor whose slice contains it. A new capture supersedes; it does not edit. -- **the affected slice in this formalism** — The scope the harness computes is the node, its slots, every `objective` whose dependency slice contains it, and every projected net element those produce. Apply the node's aspects and the conditional requirements exposed by its motifs, smallest delta first. -- **the delta in the net** — Projection re-runs over the whole model, deterministically. Show which net elements changed, which are unchanged, and which code obligations the change reopened. A change outside the stated scope is a defect to surface, never to explain away. - -### Close - -- **Report the difference** — Say what changed, what it affected, and what the model can now answer that it could not, or no longer can. -- **stopping outcomes** — Named and distinct: `corrected-and-projected`, `corrected-obligation-open`, `conflict-unresolved`, `scope-exceeded`, `reviewer-stopped`. -- **the delta report** — In place of the whole model: the superseding captures made, the slots and objectives whose state moved, the net elements changed and the elements confirmed unchanged, the obligations reopened, and the stopping outcome. -- **before handing off, verify** — Every changed net element traces to a superseding capture made in this session; no capture outside the scope changed; the projection outside the scope is identical before and after; the ledger records any default the correction displaced. - -## Tips +### Tips Completion is what the **Must know** section defines — the floor, then every node in each objective's dependency slice satisfied at its demanded precision — not a feeling that the conversation is done. From 61a256fa27192563ea9c5671ec7dcc85a04b286b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 14:19:25 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 024/101] new full pattern drafts Signed-off-by: Lu Nelson --- .../packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/README.md | 114 ++++++++ .../core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md | 23 ++ .../ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md | 214 ++++++++++++++ .../ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md | 11 + .../plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md | 50 ++++ .../plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md | 71 +++++ .../sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md | 127 +++++++++ .../sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md | 234 +++++++++++++++ .../sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md | 153 ++++++++++ .../_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md | 137 +++++++++ .../five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md | 204 +++++++++++++ .../five-register-synthesis/core/SYSTEM.md | 21 ++ .../five-register-synthesis/core/flue.ts | 4 + .../core/universal-elicitation.md | 231 +++++++++++++++ .../plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md | 11 + .../plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md | 88 ++++++ .../coverage-alternatives/domain-primary.md | 72 +++++ .../formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md | 155 ++++++++++ .../formalism-primary.md | 119 ++++++++ .../sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md | 58 ++++ .../sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md | 124 ++++++++ .../plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md | 268 ++++++++++++++++++ .../plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts | 24 ++ .../sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md | 136 +++++++++ .../README.md | 0 .../assemblies/01-conservative.md | 0 .../assemblies/02-balanced.md | 0 .../assemblies/03-first-turn-guarded.md | 0 .../assemblies/04-trust-contract-forward.md | 0 .../ciaran-eliciting-and-constructing.md | 0 .../exclusions-and-false-claims.md | 0 .../{ => system-prompts}/old-job-runbooks.md | 0 .../sections/authorship-and-uncertainty.md | 0 .../sections/divergence-and-revision.md | 0 .../sections/identity-and-scope.md | 0 .../sections/objective-and-attention.md | 0 .../sections/question-shape.md | 0 .../sections/skill-routing.md | 0 .../sections/stopping-and-partial-delivery.md | 0 .../sections/vocabulary-and-thread.md | 0 .../source-map.md | 0 41 files changed, 2649 insertions(+) create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/README.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/core/SYSTEM.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/core/flue.ts create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/core/universal-elicitation.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/domain-primary.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/{system-prompt => system-prompts}/README.md (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/{system-prompt => system-prompts}/assemblies/01-conservative.md (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/{system-prompt => system-prompts}/assemblies/02-balanced.md (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/{system-prompt => system-prompts}/assemblies/03-first-turn-guarded.md (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/{system-prompt => system-prompts}/assemblies/04-trust-contract-forward.md (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/{ => system-prompts}/ciaran-eliciting-and-constructing.md (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/{system-prompt => system-prompts}/exclusions-and-false-claims.md (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/{ => system-prompts}/old-job-runbooks.md (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/{system-prompt => system-prompts}/sections/authorship-and-uncertainty.md (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/{system-prompt => system-prompts}/sections/divergence-and-revision.md (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/{system-prompt => system-prompts}/sections/identity-and-scope.md (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/{system-prompt => system-prompts}/sections/objective-and-attention.md (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/{system-prompt => system-prompts}/sections/question-shape.md (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/{system-prompt => system-prompts}/sections/skill-routing.md (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/{system-prompt => system-prompts}/sections/stopping-and-partial-delivery.md (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/{system-prompt => system-prompts}/sections/vocabulary-and-thread.md (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/{system-prompt => system-prompts}/source-map.md (100%) diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/README.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/README.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..50c2f3fd1fd --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,114 @@ +# Ampcode prompt-architecture prototype + +This directory is a non-authoritative paper prototype. It proposes a content and disclosure architecture for Brunch without changing production files. + +## Design claim + +Two independent structures are needed: + +1. **Disclosure layers** determine when guidance becomes available: always-on prompt, activated skill instructions, then phase-scoped resources. +2. **Semantic roles** determine what guidance does: procedure, model content, recognition, interviewing operations, workpiece recording, diagnostics, construction, and completion checks. + +The five shared registers—**Directives**, **Recognition**, **Operations**, **Coverage**, and **Verification**—organize universal and plugin elicitation guidance. They are an additive authoring contract, not a lifecycle, workpiece schema, or reason to place every kind of guidance in one document. + +## Authored topology + +```text +ampcode/ +├── README.md +├── core/ +│ ├── SYSTEM.md +│ └── universal-elicitation.md +└── plugin-sdcpn/ + ├── APPEND_SYSTEM.md + └── sdcpn-modelling/ + ├── SKILL.md + ├── sdcpn-elicitation.md + ├── workpiece-template.md + ├── pn-construction.md + └── checks.md +``` + +Core owns universal elicitation. The plugin owns the operational-process and SDCPN specialization. The workpiece and target construction remain distinct from the model-content contract. + +## Runtime disclosure + +```text +Always present +├── core/SYSTEM.md +└── plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md + +On `sdcpn-modelling` activation +└── SKILL.md + ├── interactive branch + │ ├── universal-elicitation.md + │ ├── sdcpn-elicitation.md + │ └── workpiece-template.md when recording or revising + └── construction branch + ├── pn-construction.md + └── checks.md +``` + +The resource names in `SKILL.md` are logical addresses in one assembled Flue skill. In production, the plugin would use Flue's native `defineSkill()` to package the core-authored universal reference and plugin-authored resources under those safe skill-local names. They are not repository-relative Markdown links, and no resource relies on another resource being traversed automatically. + +## Channel boundary + +| Channel | Content test | +| --- | --- | +| Core `SYSTEM.md` | A universal invariant whose absence could already cause a wrong first turn or dishonest result | +| Plugin `APPEND_SYSTEM.md` | A specialization, activation rule, or plugin-specific guard needed before skill activation | +| `SKILL.md` | Mandatory procedure, branch selection, phase transition, or resource-reading decision | +| Elicitation references | Detailed teaching used while interviewing or revising the process account | +| Workpiece template | How supported, inferred, unsettled, corrected, and omitted material is recorded | +| Construction reference | How recorded operational meaning may be represented in an SDCPN | +| Checks | Whether the workpiece-to-construction boundary, resulting net, and delivery are honest | + +If a rule must bind before a lazy resource might be read, it does not belong only in that resource. If material merely teaches how to carry out one phase, it does not earn always-on prompt space. + +## Shared elicitation registers + +- **Directives** bind conduct within elicitation and revision. +- **Recognition** names signals and situations that may deserve attention; it does not establish facts. +- **Operations** are selectable moves for resolving the active gap; they are not a script. +- **Coverage** names information the resulting account may need for its purpose; it is not question order. +- **Verification** checks the current question, account, or interviewing trajectory and names local repairs. + +The core reference defines universal entries. The SDCPN reference contributes only operational-process or target-specific additions. Plugin silence leaves the universal guidance in force; plugin additions may narrow applicability but may not silently weaken universal directives. + +## Responsibility map + +| Responsibility | Owner | +| --- | --- | +| Universal identity and non-negotiable epistemic conduct | `core/SYSTEM.md` | +| Detailed general elicitation repertoire | `core/universal-elicitation.md` | +| SDCPN specialization and pre-activation guardrails | `plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md` | +| Capability-aware lifecycle and progressive routing | `sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md` | +| Operational-process recognition, content, moves, and diagnostics | `sdcpn-elicitation.md` | +| Recoverable process-model artifact | `workpiece-template.md` | +| Petri-net mappings and construction patterns | `pn-construction.md` | +| Construction readiness, net fidelity, and delivery | `checks.md` | + +## Main relocations from the first Ampcode candidate + +- Detailed procedure, movements, probes, licenses, and universal diagnostics leave `SYSTEM.md` for `universal-elicitation.md`. +- Universal cues and interviewing moves leave the plugin reference for core. +- The plugin reference becomes additive rather than a second self-contained elicitation manual. +- The five registers replace overlapping labels such as lenses versus cues and techniques versus probes, while workpiece and construction contracts remain separate. +- Construct-only behavior is treated as a runtime branch, not an unconditional plugin instruction. +- Closed stopping-outcome codes are replaced by a plain account of what was produced, checked, blocked, assumed, or left open. + +## Material retained from Ciaran's outline + +The plugin Coverage register retains goals and avoidance conditions; triggers and prerequisites; participants, locations, and resources; activities and input-use semantics; process flow, failures, retries, and recovery; and quantities and validation. It also makes retry scope, data bindings, spatial transfer, goal trade-offs, tolerated probabilities, and one-logical-step-to-several-net-elements explicit. + +## Non-goals + +This prototype does not define a machine-readable register schema, typed capture store, completion algebra, renderer, document loader, second agent, or automatic link traversal. It does not prove that the wording outperforms the frozen baseline or change the current Flue composition. + +## Primary sources + +- [`../../src/SYSTEM.md`](../../src/SYSTEM.md) +- [`../../../plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md`](../../../plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md) +- [`../system-prompts/ciaran-eliciting-and-constructing.md`](../system-prompts/ciaran-eliciting-and-constructing.md) +- [`../../../plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/`](../../../plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/) +- [`../five-register-synthesis/`](../five-register-synthesis/) diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..284986ff809 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +# Universal Elicitation + +You are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select. + +## Purpose-relative attention + +Establish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category. + +## Interaction + +Use the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame. + +## Authorship and uncertainty + +Keep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them. + +## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery + +Maintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible. + +## Extension contract + +Target-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..449d3f7066e --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md @@ -0,0 +1,214 @@ +# Universal Elicitation Reference + +This reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies. + +The registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece. + +## Directives + +### Work from purpose + +Establish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it. + +### Accumulate posture conversationally + +Learn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form. + +### Follow the person's account + +Use the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account. + +### Protect interaction bandwidth + +Do not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time. + +### Preserve authorship and uncertainty + +Keep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not. + +Preserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result. + +### Treat divergence as information + +Do not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes. + +### Maintain a recoverable workpiece + +Record useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached. + +### Stop honestly + +Completion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible. + +## Recognition + +Recognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question. + +### Vague or compressed language + +Words such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it. + +### Normative language + +“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists. + +### Tension within or between accounts + +An answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood. + +### Unexplained terms and artifacts + +Local terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading. + +### Burden, impatience, or limited availability + +These are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly. + +### Diminishing yield + +Several turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question. + +### Assent without independent wording + +Quick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content. + +### Silence and absence + +Material may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds. + +## Operations + +Choose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule. + +### Select the smallest consequential absence + +Compare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it. + +### Slice a concrete case + +Walk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced. + +### Sweep one property + +After a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category. + +### Ask for the last occurrence + +When a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons. + +### Ask for the basis + +Ask how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement. + +### Ground a term or artifact + +Ask for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts. + +### Clarify until observable + +Clarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe. + +### Use contrastive cases + +When ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies. + +### Investigate quantities relative to purpose + +Before deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency. + +### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold + +When an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose. + +### State a contradiction without resolving it + +Put the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them. + +### Restate for correction + +Offer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept. + +### Propose structure for correction + +When low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it. + +### Deposit and defer + +When an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit. + +### Press without trapping + +When time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed. + +### Explore a rare or severe outcome + +Use a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment. + +### Seek a witness or counterexample + +Ask for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule. + +### Trade concrete outcomes + +When a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate. + +### Close with one correction opportunity + +Before a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage. + +## Coverage + +Coverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model. + +A workpiece may need to preserve: + +- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation; +- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms; +- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on; +- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter; +- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes; +- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording; +- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship; +- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked; +- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation; +- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence; +- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and +- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning. + +Coverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible. + +## Verification + +Verification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence. + +### Before asking + +- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty. +- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template. +- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame. +- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours. + +### Before recording + +- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default. +- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule. +- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence. +- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account. + +### Before closing + +- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction. +- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting. +- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category. +- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion. + +### Failure signals and repairs + +- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker. +- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty. +- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption. +- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it. +- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire. +- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps. +- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition. +- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..194d51818c0 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN + +Specialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece. + +Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive interviewing, workpiece revision, or construction. + +During interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish. + +Use mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead. + +When the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a055797ae38 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ +--- +name: sdcpn-modelling +description: Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact. +--- + +# Capability-aware lifecycle + +Use one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred. + +## Select the runtime branch + +### Interactive elicitation or revision + +Interview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation. + +### Construct-only execution + +Use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation. + +## Procedure + +### Orient + +Establish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins. + +### Elicit or revise + +For a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order. + +### Maintain the workpiece + +Treat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it. + +Whenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece. + +### Construct + +Construct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes. + +Construction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece. + +### Check and deliver + +Apply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent. + +An explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview. + +## Resource discipline + +Read resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..41c49c39aa8 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ +# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks + +Read this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references. + +These checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial. + +## Before construction + +- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms. +- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported. +- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case. +- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved. +- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result. +- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged. +- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present. + +If materially different nets remain possible because one consequential fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Ask the smallest resolving question only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry. + +## During construction + +- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation. +- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference. +- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose. +- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it. +- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change. +- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece. + +## Structural validity + +- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case. +- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity. +- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs. +- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion. +- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths. +- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them. +- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state. +- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior. + +A parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check. + +## Fidelity and uncertainty + +- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims. +- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece. +- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context. +- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support. +- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior. +- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece. +- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity. + +## Existing-net revision + +- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation. +- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material. +- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change. +- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements. +- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed. + +## Delivery + +Deliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one. + +State plainly: + +- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked; +- what the result can support and what it must not claim; +- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain; +- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and +- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any. + +Do not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6f2dcb443fb --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@ +# SDCPN Construction + +Read this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model. + +Construction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete. + +## Construction boundary + +Before constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case. + +If materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path. + +When Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net. + +## Mapping principles + +| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation | +| --- | --- | +| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior | +| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable | +| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it | +| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes | +| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state | +| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior | +| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential | +| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece | +| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them | + +A physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node. + +## Petrinaut tool sequence + +When the corresponding tools are mounted: + +1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net. +2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`. +3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them. +4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes. +5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end. +6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial. + +The mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields. + +## Construction patterns + +Patterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts. + +### Timed work + +When a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail. + +### Conditional or probabilistic outcome + +Represent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap. + +### Contended resource + +Hold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return. + +Compile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded. + +### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs + +- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records. +- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release. +- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work. + +Confirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning. + +### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite + +Represent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate. + +### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement + +Represent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum. + +### Mode change + +Represent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs. + +### Event, failure, retry, and recovery + +Represent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset. + +### Continuous quantity and threshold + +Carry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior. + +### Spatial transfer + +Represent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported. + +### Hidden waiting + +Derive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object. + +## Inference, approximation, and target loss + +Name every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece. + +Potentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible: + +- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order; +- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value; +- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose; +- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and +- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning. + +Not acceptable: + +- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge; +- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values; +- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution; +- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior; +- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or +- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence. + +Record workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification. + +## Existing-net analysis and bounded change + +Start from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta. + +Do not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones. + +After a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c828ee7ecdf --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md @@ -0,0 +1,234 @@ +# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation + +This reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance. + +The registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary. + +## Directives + +### Build the operational account the purpose needs + +Elicit or revise an account that can support the person's stated simulation question, comparison, or decision. Establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use. + +Every objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure. + +### Keep target structure backstage + +Ask about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions. + +### Preserve operational context + +A value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter. + +### Separate evidence from precision + +A narrowly stated value is not necessarily well supported, and a well-supported account may remain broad. Preserve what the person or source supports separately from how narrow the value is. Do not force a distribution, rate, probability, or threshold below the granularity the operation can observe. + +### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses + +Recurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary. + +## Recognition + +Recognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread. + +### Language and account signals + +- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource. +- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input. +- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception. +- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change. +- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone. +- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context. +- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity. +- **A memorable failure** establishes a possible mechanism and consequence, not its probability. + +### Operational situation patterns + +#### Timed work + +An activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability. + +#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome + +An activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows. + +#### Contended resource + +Several activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return. + +#### Consumed, reserved, or read input + +An activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities. + +#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite + +Work becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it. + +#### Continuous quantity and threshold + +A level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior. + +#### Mode change + +Setup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity. + +#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement + +Work moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group. + +#### Spatial transfer + +A change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary. + +#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery + +A disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome. + +#### Policy under pressure + +More than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule. + +#### Hidden waiting + +A gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node. + +## Operations + +Use the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns. + +### Choose the case unit before slicing + +When several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff. + +### Link the slice to the objective + +As the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail. + +### Expose the process spine + +Ask what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine. + +### Sweep operational concerns, not headings + +After a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality. + +### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs + +For each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns. + +### Sweep what can befall an activity + +Across the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery. + +### Test practiced policy with a borderline case + +When a document or general rule says what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case. Preserve prescribed and practiced accounts and the context selecting between them rather than averaging them. + +### Close a resource account + +For a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability. + +### Close a mode change in both directions + +Ask whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does. + +### Turn waiting into a causal question + +Ask what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity. + +### Ask what is conserved + +When quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it. + +### Establish retry scope + +Ask whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset. + +### Establish validation from observable behavior + +Ask what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests. + +### Re-enter from construction narrowly + +When construction cannot choose among materially different structures without inventing an operational fact, name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only in an interactive conversation; otherwise deposit it as a re-entry question. + +## Coverage + +Coverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories. + +### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds + +Preserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights. + +### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions + +Preserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential. + +### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources + +Preserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior. + +### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use + +For each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation. + +### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery + +Preserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes. + +### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior + +Preserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports. + +### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes + +Preserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds. + +### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings + +Preserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable. + +### Things not independently elicited as target nodes + +- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure. +- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time. +- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape. +- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. + +## Verification + +Apply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`. + +### Purpose and process + +- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms. +- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported. +- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff. +- Questions follow the person's active thread rather than the Coverage headings. + +### Operational semantics + +- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. +- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required. +- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential. +- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue. +- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ. + +### Quantities and context + +- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold preserves the context and precision the evidence supports. +- One memorable incident has not silently become a frequency. +- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named. +- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value. + +### Failure signals and repairs + +- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it. +- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question. +- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage. +- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation. +- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context. +- **False quantitative confidence:** a vivid incident becomes a probability or an unknown spread becomes a conventional distribution. Restore the supported form. +- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies. +- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7fa214e7e4e --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md @@ -0,0 +1,153 @@ +# Process-Model Workpiece and Recording Contract + +The workpiece is the shared, recoverable operational account. Elicitation and revision maintain it; construction consumes it. The transcript remains evidence, not the primary model. + +Follow the person's thread during conversation and file material into the workpiece afterward. Its headings are recording homes, not question order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose, while keeping consequential omissions visible. + +## Recording distinctions + +Use these distinctions wherever they carry information; they are not mandatory labels on every sentence: + +- **Expert evidence** — What the person said, preserving consequential vocabulary, hedges, context, and source regime. +- **Working account** — The current normalized operational description accepted for use. +- **Agent inference** — An interpretation of evidence, visibly attributed to the agent. +- **Assumed** — A value or structure proposed by the agent, with its reason, consequence, and route to checking. +- **Unknown** — Asked, but the person does not know. +- **Not yet asked** — Relevant and identified, but not yet addressed. +- **Deferred** — Left for later, with why it matters and a named source or route to an answer. +- **Declined** — The person chose not to answer or include it. +- **Conflict** — Accounts cannot yet be used together; preserve both and what could distinguish them. +- **Correction** — A current account that replaces an earlier one, retaining enough history to explain the change without leaving both active. +- **Contextual coexistence** — Different accounts apply under different people, times, modes, directions, policies, or operating conditions. +- **Omitted** — Deliberately outside the model, with why the purpose permits the omission. +- **Target loss** — Supported operational meaning the SDCPN or current tools cannot faithfully carry. + +Evidence and precision are independent. “About three hours” may be supported but coarse; an exact agent-supplied value may be precise-looking but unsupported. + +Keep one authoritative home for each active claim. Do not accumulate competing summaries. When a later statement differs, establish whether it is a correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before updating the working account. + +## Workpiece template + +```markdown +# Process-Model Workpiece + +## Purpose and posture + +### What the model must answer, compare, or support + +### Who will use it and how + +### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation + +### Available time and assumption appetite + +### What the result must not claim + +## Operational account + +### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds + +### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state + +### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources + +### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use + +For each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; record its ordering in the process spine. + +### Case and process spine + +Give the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary: what admits the case, what flows, which activities occur and in what order, what changes the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the work and resources, and what outcome or handoff ends it. + +#### Primary case: + +##### Trigger or admission + +##### Ordered account and references + +##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes + +##### Objective dependencies + +#### Additional or contrasting case: + +Add only when a different case exposes consequential structure the primary case does not. + +### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior + +### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes + +### Validation evidence and data sources + +## Evidence and interpretation + +Keep evidence beside affected process material where practical. Use this section for evidence spanning several parts of the account or whose relationship needs explanation. + +### Exact expert evidence + +### Normalized account + +### Agent inferences and proposed structure + +## Open matters and authorship + +### Assumptions + +For each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked. + +### Unknown to the person + +### Not yet asked + +### Declined + +### Deferred and deposits + +For each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it. + +### Ambiguities and conflicts + +Preserve alternatives and the evidence for each. Do not choose or average without support. + +### Corrections + +State the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active. + +### Contextual coexistence + +Preserve accounts differing by person, time, condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one. + +### Deliberate omissions and simplifications + +State what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong. + +## Construction review + +Open this section only when construction begins. + +### Candidate target structures + +### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults + +### Questions reopened by construction + +### Target-representation and tooling losses + +## Delivery status + +### What this workpiece currently supports + +### Consequential gaps + +### Net status and tool evidence +``` + +## Maintenance + +- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions. +- Update the authoritative process spine when ordering or case behavior changes; reference activity and resource entries rather than duplicating their local details. +- A restatement offered by the agent remains normalization even when accepted. Preserve exact evidence separately where origin matters. +- For a genuine correction, update the active account and record what changed. For conflict or contextual coexistence, keep the alternatives and their unresolved or selecting conditions visible. +- Remove irrelevant empty sections. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, or **Omitted** only when that state matters to later work. +- If construction requires transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that boundary. +- Record whether no construction was attempted, construction was blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1dc16c61ea1 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,137 @@ +# Five-Register Brunch Synthesis + +**Status: temporary, non-authoritative evaluation workbench.** Nothing in this directory is imported, built, or part of the active Brunch agent. The active production files remain under `packages/core/src/` and `packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/`. + +This candidate remaps the current core prompt, SDCPN prompt material, runbook skill resources, Ciaran's process-modelling outline, the core prompt workbench, and selected predecessor design material into the architecture agreed during the owner-led Mission 4 design conversation. + +## Decisions embodied + +1. The core system prompt is a compact invariant set, not a general elicitation manual. +2. The SDCPN system-prompt append is a concise target contract and router. +3. The two always-on prompt fragments stand independently; core does not define headings that the plugin append must fill. +4. The agent maintains a recoverable workpiece first and constructs a checked SDCPN only when the required guidance, evidence, and capabilities are available. +5. The universal identity includes initial elicitation and analysis or revision of existing models. +6. Detailed universal elicitation teaching and plugin guidance are separately authored progressive layers. +7. Both progressive layers use the same additive registers: **Directives**, **Recognition**, **Operations**, **Coverage**, and **Verification**. +8. A plugin profile couples its reusable domain typology and target formalism; the registers classify what guidance does, not where its knowledge originated. +9. The SDCPN plugin profile is one resource containing all five registers. +10. Register headings are fixed, but contents remain freeform Markdown. No repeated card schema, machine-readable entry type, renderer, or completion algebra is proposed. +11. Plugin guidance may add context or narrow applicability; it does not silently weaken universal directives. +12. The separately authored progressive layers are composed into one packaged skill with Flue's native `defineSkill({ instructions, files })`. Markdown links guide the model but do not package, transclude, or automatically load resources. + +## Candidate topology + +```text +five-register-synthesis/ +├── README.md +├── SOURCE-MAP.md +├── core/ +│ ├── SYSTEM.md +│ ├── flue.ts +│ └── universal-elicitation.md +└── plugin-sdcpn/ + ├── APPEND_SYSTEM.md + └── sdcpn-modelling/ + ├── skill.ts + ├── instructions.md + ├── profile.md + ├── workpiece-template.md + ├── pn-construction.md + ├── checks.md + └── coverage-alternatives/ + ├── domain-primary.md + ├── formalism-primary.md + └── formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md +``` + +### Responsibilities + +- [`core/SYSTEM.md`](core/SYSTEM.md) contains the context- and target-independent role and invariants needed from the first turn. +- [`core/universal-elicitation.md`](core/universal-elicitation.md) contains progressive universal strategies and methods under the five registers; [`core/flue.ts`](core/flue.ts) exports its raw text through the existing core Flue subpath for explicit composition. +- [`plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md`](plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md) selects operational-process/SDCPN modelling, requires skill activation, states workpiece-first construction, and protects the elicitation/construction boundary. +- [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md) describes the conceptual lifecycle, distinguishes the currently available interactive and construct-only runtime branches, and routes to packaged resource names. +- [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts) uses Flue's native `defineSkill` to compose the instructions, core-owned universal reference, and plugin-owned resources into one skill. Flue synthesizes the packaged `SKILL.md`. +- [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md) is the unified additive plugin profile coupling operational-process domain typology and SDCPN consequences. +- [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md) is the recoverable process-model artifact. +- [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md) contains construction mappings and patterns disclosed only during construction. +- [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md) checks the workpiece-to-construction boundary, net structure, fidelity, revision, and delivery. + +## How to read the synthesized set + +### Always-on context + +Read these in concatenation order: + +1. [`core/SYSTEM.md`](core/SYSTEM.md) +2. [`plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md`](plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md) + +They deliberately do not mirror headings. Evaluate whether the append adds a specialization without restating or weakening the core contract. + +### Activated modelling lifecycle + +Read [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md), then inspect [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts). The instructions should make the lifecycle and packaged-resource pointers legible without embedding the reference content itself; the definition should contain composition only, not duplicate their prose. + +For elicitation or revision, follow its pointers to: + +1. [`core/universal-elicitation.md`](core/universal-elicitation.md) +2. [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md) +3. [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md) when the workpiece is first created or materially revised + +For construction and net delivery, additionally read: + +1. [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md) +2. [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md) + +Workpiece-only delivery uses the universal and plugin Verification registers without disclosing construction resources. + +## Coverage fog-line + +The profile uses a **domain-typology-primary Coverage index provisionally**, because a complete candidate is easier to evaluate than an abstract choice. This is not a settled design decision. + +Compare two aligned profile/workpiece pairs: + +- **Domain-primary candidate:** [`profile.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md) with [`workpiece-template.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md); [`coverage-alternatives/domain-primary.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/domain-primary.md) isolates its Coverage register. +- **Formalism-primary candidate:** substitute [`coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary.md) and use its paired [`coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md). + +Walk the same cases through both: + +- a reusable resource that is acquired, unavailable while held, and released in a changed or unchanged state; +- a failure that retries part of a process and must release or retain occupied resources; +- a physical location whose relevance could be boundary, state, capacity, eligibility, travel, or no model distinction; +- an external event and an internal threshold that can both trigger work; +- a mode change whose loss differs by direction; +- hidden waiting caused by policy, batching, calendar, resource availability, or recovery. + +Evaluate which index lets a slice or sweep find Recognition and Coverage without turning the concepts into question order, losing target obligations, or requiring repeated many-to-many translation. + +## Under-structure check + +The five register headings are the only required entry structure. While reviewing, note concrete places where freeform entries make any of these hard: + +- determining whether text is binding, diagnostic, optional, a coverage concern, or a check; +- linking a Recognition signal to relevant Coverage without duplicating content; +- knowing when an Operation should stop or re-evaluate; +- distinguishing a failed check from its repair; +- finding the same concept reliably across universal and plugin layers. + +Only observed failures here would justify a repeated card grammar or machine-readable structure. + +## Observed runtime boundaries + +The current production composition does not expose the whole conceptual lifecycle in one conversation. Ordinary interactive conversations can elicit and revise the workpiece but do not mount construction tools. The `validated-construction` branch mounts construction tools and explicitly forbids interviewing. The candidate therefore routes a construction-discovered gap differently by branch: ask only when interactive elicitation is actually available; otherwise return a construction-gap report and the smallest question for a later interactive conversation. + +The currently mounted construction tools inspect and add types, parameters, places, transitions, and arcs. They do not generally update or remove existing net structure. Existing-model analysis and workpiece revision remain in scope by owner decision, but general existing-net revision is not claimed; the construction resource permits only genuinely supported additive changes and otherwise reports the missing mutation capability. + +## Verified skill composition + +Flue packages every regular file inside a statically imported `SKILL.md` directory, whether linked or unlinked. It does not parse Markdown links as package edges, include linked files outside that directory, transclude linked content, or automatically load a resource chain. Symlinks inside an imported skill directory are rejected. Activation preserves Markdown links as instruction text and separately advertises each packaged resource with the exact virtual path required by `read_skill_resource`. + +The accepted candidate therefore uses native `defineSkill` composition instead of a cross-package Markdown link. The core Flue subpath exports the raw universal reference; the plugin imports it and maps both authored layers to stable packaged resource names. A temporary core-package → plugin-package → production Flue-app build using this synthesis succeeded, registered the agent, carried both exact resources in the bundle, and advertised them under one `sdcpn-modelling` skill. + +This closes packaging feasibility without a filesystem loader, Markdown transclusion, copied source, second skill, or second agent. Promotion must still apply the source and package-export changes and exercise the repository's real built-agent tests. + +## Non-goals + +This candidate does not introduce typed captures, closed claim kinds, demanded slots, a completion algebra, an observer fold, a projection engine, live data bindings, automatic affected-slice computation, or a second agent. It does not modify or represent itself as the frozen Mission 3 instrument. + +See [`SOURCE-MAP.md`](SOURCE-MAP.md) for what moved, what was consolidated, and what was deliberately excluded. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8128740039f --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md @@ -0,0 +1,204 @@ +# Synthesis Source Map + +This map accounts for the primary working and draft material used to produce the candidate. It is an editorial provenance aid, not evidence that any prompt wording improves behavior. + +## Destination map + +| Destination | Responsibility | Main sources | +| --- | --- | --- | +| `core/SYSTEM.md` | Compact always-on universal role and invariants | Active core `src/SYSTEM.md`; `_drafts/system-prompts/assemblies/*`; prompt audit and section workbench | +| `core/universal-elicitation.md` | Progressive universal strategies and methods under five registers | Active SDCPN `elicitation.md` entries marked universal; core `repertoire.yaml`; current APPEND cues/probes/movements/licenses/guards that do not depend on SDCPN; predecessor `elicit/SKILL.md` | +| `core/flue.ts` | Raw-string export of the core-owned progressive reference through the existing core Flue subpath | Verified `?raw` library build and cross-package `defineSkill` composition spike | +| `plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md` | Concise operational-process/SDCPN specialization and router | Active plugin `flue.ts` inline instruction; active APPEND role; current skill lifecycle and construction boundary | +| `sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md` | Conceptual lifecycle, runtime branches, and packaged-resource routing | Active `sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md`; accepted Mission 3 information hierarchy; predecessor elicitation procedure | +| `sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts` | Explicit composition of separately authored resources into one Flue skill | Installed Flue `defineSkill` contract; verified core-package → plugin-package → production Flue-app spike | +| `sdcpn-modelling/profile.md` | Unified operational-process domain typology and SDCPN profile under five registers | Active APPEND target material; active `elicitation.md` SDCPN/mixed material; Ciaran outline; current plugin YAML concepts | +| `workpiece-template.md` | Provisional domain-primary recoverable process-model workpiece | Active `ir-template.md`; Mission 4 proof obligations; Ciaran investigation headings | +| `coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md` | Workpiece paired with the formalism-primary Coverage alternative for a fair comparison | Active `ir-template.md`; formalism-primary Coverage candidate; Mission 4 proof obligations | +| `pn-construction.md` | SDCPN mappings, construction patterns, inference, bounded change, and losses | Active `pn-construction.md`; APPEND `Maps To` material; Ciaran transformation patterns | +| `checks.md` | Phase-boundary, net, fidelity, revision, and delivery checks | Active `checks.md`; APPEND smells/rabbit holes/failure signatures; current construction tool contract | +| `coverage-alternatives/*` | Concrete comparison at the unresolved Coverage-index fog-line | Active typology table; Ciaran headings; predecessor kind-indexed question reference | + +## Active core system prompt + +Source: `packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md`. + +| Source material | Treatment | +| --- | --- | +| Universal elicitation identity | Kept and tightened in candidate core `SYSTEM.md` | +| Modelling plans/systems and analyzing/modifying existing models | Kept by explicit owner decision in the universal identity and lifecycle revision path | +| Rich IR and target artifacts | Reframed as recoverable workpiece first and capability-dependent target production | +| Objectives and appetite | Invariant retained in the system prompt; procedure expanded only in universal progressive Directives/Operations | +| Slice/sweep, probing, absences, batching, assumption ledger | Moved out of always-on context into universal progressive Operations/Directives | +| Expert vocabulary | Retained as an always-on invariant and elaborated progressively | +| Closing procedure | Compact stopping invariant always-on; detailed close and checks progressive | +| Empty `Methods`, `Judgment`, and `How to check` headings | Removed rather than preserved as taxonomy scaffolding | +| `Patterns`, `Techniques`, `Lenses`, `Motifs`, `Smells`, `Rabbit holes`, `Failure modes` metacontract | Replaced by the progressive five-register address space; no plugin heading contract remains in `SYSTEM.md` | +| Claim that the harness surfaces patterns or computes completion | Excluded as false for the active path | +| Placeholder YAML frontmatter | Excluded from model-facing candidates | + +## Active SDCPN append + +Source: `packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md`. + +| Source section | Destination and treatment | +| --- | --- | +| Plugin job | Condensed into the SDCPN append specialization and profile Directives | +| Typology table | Domain-primary and formalism-primary Coverage candidates; downstream mapping detail moved to construction | +| Things that look like kinds and are not | Plugin Coverage and construction principles | +| Quantity, source-regime, evidence, and precision attributes | Universal authorship/uncertainty plus plugin context/precision Directives and Verification | +| Per-kind aspects | Distributed into plugin Coverage; no longer presented as question order | +| Cues | Split between universal Recognition and plugin Recognition according to target dependence | +| Motifs | Recast as plugin Recognition situation patterns; their embedded questions moved to Operations and target structures to construction | +| Probes | Mostly universal Operations; conservation and operational-resource probes remain plugin Operations | +| Slice/sweep | Universal Operations own the methods; plugin Operations own case-unit and process-specific sweep refinements | +| Licenses | Universal Directives/Operations where formalism-independent; target constraints retained in plugin Directives | +| Smells and rabbit holes | Converted into near-action Verification checks and repairs; duplicates removed | +| Interviewer failure modes | Consolidated by invariant under universal/plugin Verification; evaluator-style wording omitted where it adds no agent action | +| Final `Must know` tip | Excluded because the referenced section and typed completion mechanism do not exist in the active path | + +## Active SDCPN skill resources + +Sources: `packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/`. + +### `SKILL.md` → `instructions.md` plus `skill.ts` + +The active skill's conceptual lifecycle, `runbook-ir` full-document emission convention, partial delivery, and phase resource routing move to plain `instructions.md`. The candidate requires a final full workpiece emission before construction handoff and workpiece-only delivery. It also distinguishes the current interactive and construct-only runtime branches: construct-only execution reports a re-entry question instead of interviewing. Existing-model revision applies fully to the workpiece and only to net changes supported by mounted mutation capabilities. + +The plugin-owned `skill.ts` uses Flue's native `defineSkill` to map the instructions, core-owned universal reference, and plugin-owned profile/template/construction/check resources into one packaged skill. Flue synthesizes the packaged `SKILL.md`; no authored duplicate remains. + +### `elicitation.md` + +The current file's merged universal and SDCPN material is separated by ownership: + +- posture, questioning, evidence, uncertainty, prioritization, stopping, generic probes, and generic failure guards move to `core/universal-elicitation.md`; +- operational-process signals, patterns, investigation needs, and target caveats move to `plugin-sdcpn/.../profile.md`; +- target construction consequences move to `pn-construction.md`. + +The active file's Ciaran-derived “What to investigate” headings seed the domain-primary Coverage candidate and workpiece template. + +### `ir-template.md` + +The candidate retains a human-readable Markdown workpiece, full `runbook-ir` emission, expert vocabulary, assumptions, unknowns, conflict, omissions, and losses. It adds explicit homes for not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, correction, contextual coexistence, exact evidence, normalized account, agent inference, process spine, resource-use semantics, and construction-opened questions. These homes are structural aids, not mandatory per-statement types. Because Coverage indexing remains unresolved, the workbench contains aligned domain-primary and formalism-primary workpiece candidates rather than treating one artifact shape as settled. + +### `pn-construction.md` + +Mapping principles, tool-authoritative construction, reusable patterns, visible inference/approximation, loss reporting, and worked semantic cases are retained and expanded with Ciaran's consumed/reserved/read distinction and predecessor timed/probabilistic patterns. The predecessor probability comparison is corrected rather than copied. + +### `checks.md` + +Elicitation sufficiency and workpiece-only delivery checks live in the universal and plugin Verification registers. Phase-specific `checks.md` is disclosed only for construction and net delivery; it owns PN validity, resource return, ordering, loss review, bounded net-change checks, and honest net-status reporting. Closed stopping-outcome codes are replaced by plain observed-state reporting. + +## Ciaran outline + +Source: `packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/ciaran-eliciting-and-constructing.md`. + +| Draft material | Destination | +| --- | --- | +| Goals, avoidance, measures, factors, importance, thresholds | Plugin Coverage: purpose/goals/measures/constraints; workpiece operational coverage | +| Process failure, retry, unhappy paths | Plugin Recognition: failure/retry/recovery; Operations: disruption sweep; Coverage: flow/failure/recovery; construction event/recovery pattern | +| Triggers and prerequisites | Plugin Recognition and domain-primary Coverage; formalism-primary cross-mapping to boundary/flow/policy/dynamics/activity | +| Actors | Participants/entity distinctions, performer and decision roles | +| Locations | Recognition and Coverage as a cross-cutting operational perspective; explicit guard against equating physical location with PN place | +| Resources and caps | Contended-resource Recognition; resource Coverage; construction resource pattern | +| Step inputs and consumed/reserved/read use | Plugin Operations, Coverage, workpiece, construction mappings, and checks | +| Step duration and variability | Timed-work Recognition, Coverage, construction pattern, and checks | +| Step success/failure and outcomes | Failure/branch Recognition, Coverage, construction pattern, and checks | +| Timed-work building block | Construction-only timed-work pattern | +| Probabilistic branch building block | Construction-only conditional/probabilistic pattern; unchecked inequality convention explicitly rejected | + +## Core prompt workbench + +Sources: `packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/` (moved from the earlier singular `system-prompt/` workbench during this consultation). + +- The candidate system prompt follows the balanced/trust-forward material while preserving the owner-selected scope for existing-model analysis and revision. +- Purpose-relative attention, first-turn load, vocabulary, authorship, divergence, and honest partial delivery are retained. +- Detailed orientation, question-shape, and closing procedures move to the universal progressive reference. +- Plugin names, target syntax, suspended machinery, evaluation controls, universal `2–4` batching, mandatory quantitative scripts, and absolute completion claims remain excluded. + +## Old job runbooks + +Source: `packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/old-job-runbooks.md`. + +Retained where behavior remains truthful: + +- objectives and purpose before irrelevant structure; +- slice then sweep; +- workpiece and assumption/loss delivery; +- locate disputed material before revision; +- report what changed and what the model can support afterward. + +Excluded or weakened because the active path does not provide the claimed mechanism: + +- harness-computed completion and affected slices; +- capture supersession as an enforced runtime operation; +- deterministic whole-model projection claims; +- mechanically guaranteed unchanged scope; +- closed stopping-outcome enums. + +## Predecessor Brunch material + +### Universal elicitation skill + +Source: `/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/brunch/src/agents/skills/elicit/SKILL.md`. + +Retained design shape: + +- inspect current understanding and identify the smallest meaningful absence; +- choose a relevant concern and ask one focused question; +- use contrastive cases for ambiguity; +- select content by the plane of uncertainty; +- treat routing signals as heuristics rather than automatic truth; +- re-evaluate after each answer. + +Substrate-specific graph, scratchpad, structured-exchange, readiness-band, ingest, and map machinery is not imported into this candidate. + +### Kind-indexed question reference + +Source: `/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/brunch/src/agents/skills/elicit/references/question-kinds-per-intent-kind.md`. + +Retained design shape: + +- Coverage can provide stable attention addresses while questions remain open and adapted to current context; +- adding a question does not require adding a target kind; +- operations project from general coverage to a situated question rather than reading a catalogue verbatim. + +The predecessor intent-graph kinds and closed ontology are not imported. Its kind-primary organization motivates the formalism-primary Coverage alternative for comparison. + +### Behavioral kernels + +Source: `/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/brunch/docs/design/BEHAVIORAL_KERNELS.md`. + +Retained design shape: + +- Recognition sits between the person's domain and the next question; +- a reusable situation pattern is not a domain, phase, template, or user-facing formalism; +- one concrete domain composes several patterns; +- signals activate a small relevant set rather than a comprehensive questionnaire; +- contrastive questions expose consequential distinctions; +- patterns connect recognition, operations, artifact consequences, and checks. + +The predecessor software-specification kernel ontology, intent graph, typed artifacts, validators, and proof-candidate machinery are not imported. + +## Deliberate exclusions + +The synthesized set does not claim or introduce: + +- harness-owned captures, folds, demanded slots, completion computation, or affected-slice computation; +- stable assertion identifiers, a capture store, provenance joins, or automatic supersession; +- a closed domain ontology, mandatory per-statement epistemic kinds, or machine-readable register entries; +- a rendered repertoire/plugin compiler, filesystem loader, second model-facing skill, or second agent; `defineSkill` is the existing Flue packaging primitive, not a new runtime; +- hidden answer keys, grader mistake IDs, fixed turn budgets, or evaluation thresholds; +- concrete Vestera facts or any other scenario-specific teaching; +- a universal question count, batch size, quantitative script, or absolute completeness claim; +- automatic live data bindings or a claim that parser acceptance proves simulation validity. + +## Potential losses to inspect during evaluation + +- Whether the compact system prompt under-activates slice/sweep before progressive references are read. +- Whether one plugin profile containing both operational-process and SDCPN knowledge becomes too large despite the register structure. +- Whether freeform register contents make cross-register routing ambiguous enough to earn a card grammar. +- Whether the verified `defineSkill` composition retains its observed resource names, lazy reads, and one-skill behavior when promoted through the repository's actual package exports and built-agent tests. +- Whether domain-primary Coverage hides target obligations or formalism-primary Coverage induces schema-shaped questioning. +- Whether the workpiece's explicit epistemic homes feel like an unwanted semantic type system. +- Whether existing-model analysis/revision remains too weakly specified to support the universal identity claim. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/core/SYSTEM.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/core/SYSTEM.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..913bd1fed02 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/core/SYSTEM.md @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +# Universal Elicitation + +You are a universal elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select. Maintain a recoverable workpiece as that understanding develops; produce a target artifact only when the applicable guidance and capabilities support it. + +## Purpose-relative attention + +Establish what the result must help the person decide, answer, or change, then spend questions on distinctions that can affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category. + +## Interaction + +Use the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame. + +## Authorship and uncertainty + +Preserve authorship and uncertainty. Keep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, or default. Do not invent content, silently make an answer more precise, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. Treat tensions as information: establish whether a later account is a correction, a conflict, or a context in which both accounts hold before reconciling them. + +## Stopping and delivery + +Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible. + +Target-specific instructions and progressive teaching may add or narrow guidance. They do not silently weaken these invariants. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/core/flue.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/core/flue.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..95254f04bdf --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/core/flue.ts @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +import universalElicitationReference from "./universal-elicitation.md?raw"; + +/** Core-owned progressive elicitation teaching for explicit skill composition. */ +export { universalElicitationReference }; diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/core/universal-elicitation.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/core/universal-elicitation.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..bc7cd6687f5 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/core/universal-elicitation.md @@ -0,0 +1,231 @@ +# Universal Elicitation Reference + +This progressive reference applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin profile may add context, specialize an operation, or name target consequences under the same five registers. It may not silently weaken these directives. + +The registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information the workpiece may need, not questions to ask in order. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece. + +## Directives + +### Work from purpose + +Establish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target schema has a place for it. + +### Accumulate posture conversationally + +Learn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this posture over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form. + +### Follow the person's account + +Use the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account. + +### Protect interaction bandwidth + +Do not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time. + +### Preserve authorship and uncertainty + +Keep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not. Agreement with wording you offered permits its use as accepted wording; it is not independent evidence that the person originated it. + +Preserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking workpiece. + +### Treat divergence as information + +Do not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes. + +### Maintain a recoverable workpiece + +Record useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached. + +### Stop honestly + +Completion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible. + +## Recognition + +Recognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question. + +### Vague or compressed language + +Words such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it. + +### Normative language + +“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists. + +### Tension within or between accounts + +An answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or an error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood. + +### Unexplained terms and artifacts + +Local terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading. + +### Burden, impatience, or limited availability + +These are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly. + +### Diminishing yield + +Several turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question. + +### Assent without independent wording + +Quick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain the settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content. + +### Silence and absence + +Material may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds. + +## Operations + +Choose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule. + +### Select the smallest consequential absence + +Compare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it, then let the answer determine the next operation. + +### Orient around the intended use + +Ask for the decision, comparison, worry, or change the result must support. Learn the audience, boundary, horizon, and accuracy bar only to the depth needed to choose a useful first case and avoid irrelevant structure. + +### Slice a concrete case + +Walk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify any parameters you introduced. + +### Sweep one property + +After a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category. + +### Ask for the last occurrence + +When a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons. + +### Ask for the basis + +Ask how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement. + +### Ground a term or artifact + +Ask for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts. + +### Clarify until observable + +Clarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what the terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe. + +### Use contrastive cases + +When ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies. + +### Investigate quantities relative to purpose + +Before deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. For a spread, quantiles or concrete frequency judgments are often safer than minimum/most-likely/maximum. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency. + +### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold + +When an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose. + +### State a contradiction without resolving it + +Put the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them. + +### Restate for correction + +Offer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept. + +### Propose structure for correction + +When low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it. + +### Deposit and defer + +When an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit. + +### Press without trapping + +When time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed. + +### Explore a rare or severe outcome + +Use a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment. + +### Seek a witness or counterexample + +Ask for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule. + +### Trade concrete outcomes + +When a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate. + +### Change operation when yield drops + +Move among case, contrast, basis, sweep, absence, and deferral when the current operation stops producing useful distinctions. Do not mistake repeated open questions for persistence. + +### Close with one correction opportunity + +Before a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage. + +## Coverage + +Coverage is the universal information contract for a recoverable workpiece. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. The active plugin profile adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model. + +A workpiece may need to preserve: + +- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation; +- a cold-readable account of the plan or system in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms; +- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on; +- decisions, considered alternatives, rejected alternatives, and the reasons distinctions among them matter; +- criteria, observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that could discriminate success from failure or one interpretation from another; +- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording; +- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship; +- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked; +- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation; +- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and context-dependent coexistence; +- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; +- open questions and deposits with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning. + +Coverage depth follows the purpose. A plugin category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible. + +## Verification + +Verification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence. + +### Before asking + +- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty. +- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template. +- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame. +- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours. + +### Before recording + +- Every load-bearing claim is supportable from the person's account or visibly marked as an agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default. +- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule. +- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence. +- A correction has not been left as two competing active claims. +- Contextual coexistence has not been collapsed into one average or universal rule. + +### After updating the workpiece + +- The result remains cold-readable without the transcript. +- Relevant evidence, interpretation, and uncertainty are distinguishable. +- Assumptions say why they exist and how to check them. +- Unknown, unasked, declined, deferred, conflicting, corrected, omitted, and lost material remain honest where present. +- Repeated summaries have not become competing sources of truth. + +### Before closing + +- The result's purpose and consequential account have been read back or otherwise offered for correction. +- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting. +- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category. +- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion. + +### Common failure signals and repairs + +- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker. +- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty. +- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption. +- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it. +- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency is unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire. +- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps. +- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition. +- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7affa7b8c23 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN + +Specialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop and revise a process-model workpiece in their operational vocabulary. When the available tools and evidence support it, construct and check an SDCPN from that workpiece. + +Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive interviewing, workpiece revision, or construction. Its lifecycle routes between separately authored universal elicitation teaching, the operational-process/SDCPN profile, the workpiece template, construction guidance, and checks. + +The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction. During elicitation, speak about the operation rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, or firing rules. Read construction guidance only when construction begins. + +Use mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. A construct-only conversation does not interview: if construction or checking exposes a consequential gap, report the smallest question a later elicitation must answer instead of inventing the answer. When construction tools are unavailable or the workpiece is insufficient, do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, or simulatable net. Deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report supported by that conversation. + +When the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f430d3c6124 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ +# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks + +Read this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. For workpiece-only delivery, apply the universal and plugin Verification registers without loading this construction resource. + +A failed check triggers the smallest relevant repair available in the current runtime branch: amend the workpiece, ask during interactive elicitation, revise construction, or report a visible limitation and re-entry question for a later conversation. Parser acceptance proves only that the accepted structure meets the tool schema. + +## Before construction + +- The intended question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms. +- The boundary and a meaningful concrete case are cold-readable from the workpiece. +- The process spine says what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, where waiting comes from, and what outcome or handoff ends it. +- Inputs that matter are distinguished as consumed, reserved/released, or read. +- Required resource availability and release are recorded or visibly unknown. +- Consequential quantities retain their context and supported precision. +- Practiced and prescribed rules, corrections, conflicts, and contextual variants are not silently collapsed. +- Construction can proceed without recovering a load-bearing fact from transcript memory. +- Assumptions, unresolved matters, omissions, and anticipated losses are visible. + +If the missing material admits materially different process structures, formulate the smallest resolving question before constructing. Ask it only during interactive elicitation; in construct-only execution, return it as a blocking re-entry question. If the person has stopped, deliver the partial workpiece instead of opening a new topic. + +## During construction + +- Every place, transition, connection, type, parameter, guard, priority, timing rule, and dynamic has workpiece support or a visible construction assumption. +- Activities appear in the order and branching structure the workpiece claims. +- Arc weights or multiplicities are positive and follow the mounted schema. +- A consumed input does not return unless an output recreates it. +- A reserved resource is unavailable while held and returns on every recorded release, failure, cancellation, or recovery path. +- Read-only information remains available to concurrent work. +- Exclusive outcomes are structurally exclusive under the recorded rule or parameter. +- Directional mode changes preserve their direction-specific losses. +- Continuous dynamics have a consequential threshold, effect, or observed objective. +- Waiting emerges from recorded conditions rather than an unsupported queue object. +- No missing probability silently became an even split. + +When mounted tools reject a change, repair the rejected call before depending on it. Inspect the latest definition after dependent stages and at the end. + +## Structural validity + +Using the mounted inspection capability, confirm: + +- the net contains at least one meaningful place and transition; +- every referenced identifier exists; +- every connection has valid endpoints and positive multiplicity; +- the normal process path can progress from its represented initial or admitted state to an outcome under at least one supported condition; +- branches, joins, loops, and recovery paths correspond to the workpiece; +- reusable resources are not leaked or duplicated across paths; +- exclusive modes cannot be active together unless the workpiece permits it; +- required parameters and initial populations are represented or named as external inputs; +- tool validation has no unresolved rejection. + +Missing canvas positions are acceptable unless the available consumer requires them. + +## Fidelity and uncertainty + +- Every load-bearing net choice traces to the workpiece or a named construction inference, approximation, or default. +- No hedge has been hardened solely to satisfy a schema. +- No conflict has been averaged and no contextual value has been made universal without an accepted simplification. +- Assumptions state why they were introduced, what they affect, and how they could be checked. +- Material retained only in the workpiece is named as a target or tooling loss rather than omitted silently. +- A constructed net has not been described as simulated unless an actual simulation run established that claim. + +## Revision checks + +When revising an existing workpiece or analyzing a requested net change: + +- the changed or disputed workpiece material is explicit; +- the prior and current account are distinguishable as correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence; +- the desired net delta follows from changed workpiece meaning; +- unsupported update or removal operations are reported rather than imitated with competing additive structure; +- any applied additive net changes preserve the intended existing structure; +- assumptions and losses displaced or introduced by the revision are reported; +- the delivery distinguishes what changed from what was only inspected and says what the model can now support that it could not support before, or vice versa. + +## Delivery + +Always deliver the current recoverable workpiece. Deliver the net only if construction occurred through available tools and the resulting definition was inspected. + +State plainly: + +- what question or decision the result can support; +- whether the workpiece is complete enough for the stated purpose or partial with named gaps; +- whether no net was attempted, construction is blocked, a partial net exists, or a tool-constructed net passed the checks above; +- what the agent inferred, approximated, defaulted, simplified, or omitted; +- what remains unknown, unasked, declined, deferred, conflicting, or unsupported; +- what the target formalism or current tooling could not represent; +- what smallest next evidence would change the result. + +Do not convert these descriptions into a closed completion algebra. They are an honest account of observed state. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/domain-primary.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/domain-primary.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2009e307299 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/domain-primary.md @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ +# Coverage Alternative — Domain-Typology Primary + +This is a candidate replacement for the plugin profile's **Coverage** register. It organizes attention by how a person describes an operational process while preserving the distinctions downstream SDCPN construction may need. Construction mappings remain in the construction resource. It is reproduced separately to compare navigation at the current fog-line; it is not an additional resource the agent should read alongside `profile.md`. + +## Coverage + +Coverage identifies what the workpiece may need for the stated objective and downstream SDCPN construction. It is not a questionnaire, a closed ontology, or a demand to populate irrelevant sections. + +### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds + +Preserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, or threshold the person can actually judge. An objective needs a traceable dependency on the operational account. Quantitative objectives may need metrics; qualitative objectives must not be forced into invented weights. + +Keep qualitative goals and trade-offs in the workpiece when the person cannot support a numerical measure. Construction guidance owns the later choice of target representation. + +### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions + +Preserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and reliability of boundary inputs. Distinguish a trigger from an ordinary activity and a prerequisite from a resource that the activity consumes. + +These concerns define the operational starting and enabling context. Construction guidance owns how that context is represented. + +### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources + +Preserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations affect behavior. A resource is a domain-facing role, not necessarily a separate target kind: its instances may be represented as typed elements subject to policy, capacity, and availability. + +A physical location deserves target representation only when the operation treats being there as consequential. Construction guidance owns the representational choice. + +### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use + +For each consequential activity, preserve its name in operational vocabulary, preconditions, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed/reserved/read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, occurrence if it is an event, mode-change loss, and variation by type or context. + +### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery + +Preserve the order activities occur, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery behavior, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes. Activities without stated order do not yet form a constructible process spine. + +### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior + +Preserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, dependence on type/load/calendar/state, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets. Keep unsupported precision broad or parameterized rather than manufacturing a distribution. + +### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes + +Preserve the rule applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds. Determine whether divergence is correction, unresolved conflict, or contextual coexistence. + +Construction later determines which rules are representable. Political judgment, unnamed exceptions, and unsupported conditions remain workpiece-only and must appear as losses rather than invented logic. + +### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings + +Preserve how the person would know the model is credible for its intended question, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, who or what is authoritative for missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable. + +Live data connections and qualitative validation may remain unsupported by the current target tooling; preserve them in the workpiece rather than implying implementation. + +### Cross-cutting evidence and uncertainty + +For every consequential concern, preserve the person's exact evidence where wording matters; normalized account; agent inference; assumption with reason and check; unknown, unasked, declined, or deferred material; unresolved conflict; correction; contextual variation; omission; and known target loss as applicable. These are workpiece obligations, not mandatory labels on every sentence. + +### Things not independently elicited as target nodes + +- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by the activities and conditions around it and may emerge as target structure during construction. +- A scenario is assembled for simulation from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies; it is not necessarily one elicited process element. +- A resource is an operational role that may combine entity distinctions, capacity, availability, and policy rather than requiring one universal target node shape. +- A location is operational context until its effect on state, eligibility, travel, capacity, boundary, or resource use is established. + +## What this shape makes easy + +- Finding material in the vocabulary a process expert is likely to use. +- Filing Ciaran's goals, triggers, actors, locations, resources, steps, and failure/recovery concerns without first translating them into target kinds. +- Keeping consumed/reserved/read semantics and the process spine close to the account that supplies them. + +## What this shape makes harder + +- Seeing whether every target-formalism concept needed for construction has an explicit home. +- Distinguishing one domain concern that maps to several target concepts. +- Using target kinds directly as the index for formalism-specific completion checks. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..45f519c8ca6 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md @@ -0,0 +1,155 @@ +# Formalism-Primary Workpiece Template Alternative + +This workpiece candidate pairs with [`formalism-primary.md`](formalism-primary.md). It exists to compare Coverage indexing fairly; do not load it alongside the domain-primary `../workpiece-template.md` in one run. + +It is structurally organized but not a closed semantic claim system. Follow the person's thread during the conversation; do not read these headings aloud as a questionnaire. Each active fact has one authoritative home. + +Use distinctions such as **Expert evidence**, **Working account**, **Agent inference**, **Assumed**, **Unknown**, **Not yet asked**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, **Conflict**, **Correction**, **Contextual variation**, **Omitted**, and **Loss** only where they carry information. They are not mandatory fields on every statement. + +Whenever this workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit the full latest document again before a construction handoff and before workpiece-only delivery. + +```markdown +# Process-Model Workpiece + +## Purpose and posture + +### Who will use the model and how + +### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation + +### Available time and assumption appetite + +### What the result must not claim + +## Target-relevant operational account + +These concepts are filing and checking addresses, not interview order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose; keep consequential unsupported material visible. + +### Objectives + +For each objective: what the model must answer, compare, or support, and references to the operational material on which it depends. + +### Entity distinctions + +What flows, performs work, is contended, or carries state, including actors, resources, and consequential location distinctions. + +### Boundary conditions + +Initial state and populations, arrivals and departures, calendars, external inputs and events, admission triggers, and prerequisites outside the process. + +### Activities + +Named operational activities with preconditions, performers, inputs, consumed/reserved/read use, outputs, state changes, duration, success, failure, and contextual variation. Put local activity meaning here; put order in Ordering flow. + +### Ordering flow and authoritative case spine + +Give the cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary: what admits a concrete case, which named activities occur and in what order, how branches and joins are decided, where waiting comes from, how failure/retry/recovery change the path, and what outcome or handoff ends it. Reference Activity and Entity entries instead of restating their local details. + +#### Primary case: + +##### Trigger or admission + +##### Ordered account and references + +##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes + +##### Objective dependencies + +#### Additional or contrasting case: + +Add only when a different case exposes structure the primary case does not. + +### Policies + +Practiced decision and contention rules, prescribed alternatives, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, and contextual regimes. + +### Constraints + +Capacity, eligibility, compatibility, qualification, safety, conservation, and thresholds with their operational consequences. + +### Metrics + +What is measured, how it is observed, what better means, and supported trade-offs or priorities. + +### Dynamics + +Quantities that change while no discrete event occurs: direction, rate, variation, threshold, consequence, and reset. + +### Data bindings + +Variables a real data source could drive, their source, units, update behavior, and evidence gap. Do not claim a live binding unless one exists. + +### Validation criteria + +Observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment that would make the model credible enough for its intended use. + +## Cross-cutting evidence and interpretation + +Keep evidence beside the affected material where practical. Use this section for evidence or interpretation that bears across several target concepts. + +### Exact expert evidence + +### Normalized account + +### Agent inferences and proposed structure + +### Contextual quantities and regimes + +## Open matters and authorship + +### Assumptions + +For each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked. + +### Unknown to the person + +### Not yet asked + +### Declined + +### Deferred and deposits + +For each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it. + +### Ambiguities and conflicts + +Preserve alternatives and their evidence. Do not choose or average without support. + +### Corrections + +State the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active. + +### Contextual coexistence + +Preserve accounts that differ by person, time, operating condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one. + +### Deliberate omissions and simplifications + +State what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong. + +## Construction notes + +Open this section when construction begins; do not use it to script ordinary elicitation. + +### Candidate target structures + +### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults + +### Questions reopened by construction + +### Target-representation losses + +## Delivery status + +### What this workpiece currently supports + +### Consequential gaps + +### Net status + +State whether no construction was attempted, construction is blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone. +``` + +## Comparison pressure + +This shape makes target obligations and formalism-indexed verification easy to find. It may also make the workpiece feel like a schema and may force actors, locations, resources, triggers, and process failures to be translated across several headings. Compare whether that translation burden is lower or higher than the domain-primary candidate's risk of hiding target distinctions. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ccde09ef8b7 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary.md @@ -0,0 +1,119 @@ +# Coverage Alternative — Target-Formalism Primary + +This is a candidate replacement for the plugin profile's **Coverage** register. It organizes attention by distinctions the SDCPN-oriented workpiece and construction path may need, while treating Ciaran's goals, triggers, actors, locations, resources, steps, and process failures as domain-typology perspectives that can map across several concepts. It is for comparison at the current fog-line, not an additional resource the agent should read alongside `profile.md`. + +## Coverage + +Coverage identifies target-relevant information the workpiece may need for the stated purpose. The concepts are filing and checking addresses, not a questionnaire, a closed capture ontology, or an instruction to create one node of each kind. + +### Objective + +Preserve what the model must answer, compare, or help decide; who will use the answer; what may be varied; what should improve or be avoided; relevant priorities or trade-offs; and what would make the answer credible enough. Connect each objective to the operational material it depends on or mark it unsupported. + +Ciaran's goals, safety conditions, importance, and desired/tolerated thresholds enter here, while their concrete measures and limits may also enter Metric or Constraint. + +### Entity distinction + +Preserve kinds of things the operation treats differently: what flows, what performs work, what is contended, and what state or properties change behavior. Include population shape, availability, qualification, compatibility, location effect, and whether distinctions vary across contexts. + +Ciaran's actors, resources, work items, and some locations enter here. “Resource” is a role an entity plays; it also invokes Policy, Constraint, Boundary Condition, and Activity coverage. + +Possible SDCPN consequences include colour sets, typed elements, resource tokens, and type-dependent parameters. + +### Boundary condition + +Preserve initial populations and state, arrivals and departures, calendars, external inputs and events, source reliability, admission triggers, prerequisites outside the process, and the chosen process boundary and horizon. + +Ciaran's scheduled, received, threshold, and event triggers may enter here when they originate outside the normal flow; internal triggers may instead belong to Ordering Flow, Policy, Dynamics, or Activity. + +Possible SDCPN consequences include scenario state, parameters, source transitions, and guards. + +### Activity + +Preserve what happens in operational vocabulary: preconditions, performer, inputs, whether each is consumed/reserved/read, outputs and state changes, duration, event occurrence, success and failure, recovery, mode-change loss, and dependence on type or context. + +Ciaran's steps and operational failure questions enter primarily here. A step may require several target structures during construction; Coverage does not assume one activity equals one transition. + +Possible SDCPN consequences include factored start/progress/finish transitions, intermediate places, resource arcs, timing, and typed outcomes. + +### Ordering flow + +Preserve sequence, concurrency, branching, joining, enabling triggers, loops, retry, recovery, terminal outcomes, and the conditions that choose among paths. Activities without explicit relation do not yet form a process spine. + +Ciaran's unhappy paths, retry of part or all of a process, and “what happens next” questions enter here together with Activity and Policy. + +Possible SDCPN consequences include arcs, arc types, exclusive branches, loops, and recovery paths. + +### Policy + +Preserve the rule used when more than one thing could happen or more than one claimant wants a capability: practiced priority, tie-breaking, release, override authority, prescribed alternatives, and contextual regimes. Distinguish correction, unresolved conflict, and conditions under which several accounts coexist. + +Ciaran's approvals, decision responsibility, and some goals or avoidance rules may enter here when they decide behavior rather than merely evaluate it. + +Possible SDCPN consequences include guards and priorities. Unsupported political or tacit judgment remains workpiece-only. + +### Constraint + +Preserve capacity, eligibility, compatibility, qualification, conservation, safety or regulatory limits, thresholds, and what happens when a limit is reached. A stated bound without operational consequence may be contextual rather than constructible. + +Ciaran's caps, essentially-infinite resources, safety conditions, and quantities to keep above or below enter here. + +Possible SDCPN consequences include capacities, guards, invariants checked over state, and explicit loss when no current projection exists. + +### Metric + +Preserve what is measured, how it is computed or observed, what “better” means, relevant typical or tail behavior, and any trade-off the person actually uses. Do not force qualitative objectives into invented weights. + +Ciaran's measures, importance, desired probabilities, and thresholds may enter here together with Objective and Constraint. + +Possible SDCPN consequences include scalar functions over simulation state and post-run comparisons; qualitative judgments may remain outside the net. + +### Dynamics + +Preserve quantities that change continuously while no discrete event occurs: direction and rate, variation, dependence on state, consequential threshold, triggered event, reset, and interaction among several changing components. + +Ciaran's threshold triggers and time-varying resource properties may enter here when the change is continuous rather than an arrival or ordinary activity. + +Possible SDCPN consequences include differential equations on real-valued elements, guards, and transitions triggered by crossings. + +### Data binding + +Preserve the model variable, real source or feed, units, update behavior, reliability, and the evidence gap the binding would close. Stop before implementation detail unless the stated purpose depends on it. + +Ciaran's note about drawing timings from event datasets enters here as a prospective binding, not evidence that such a connection exists. + +Current construction may retain data bindings only in the workpiece and loss report. + +### Validation criterion + +Preserve the observation, replay, historical comparison, expert judgment, or acceptance conversation that would establish that the model is credible enough for its intended use. Do not ask the person to predict the model's answer and store that prediction as structure. + +Ciaran's process goals and measures inform validation, but validation remains distinct from the behavior being modeled. + +### Cross-cutting quantity, evidence, and context + +Any concept may carry duration, rate, probability, count, capacity, or threshold; applicable entity or operating context; prescribed and practiced regimes; source and supported precision; exact expert evidence; normalization; agent inference; assumption; unknown, unasked, declined, or deferred state; conflict; correction; contextual coexistence; omission; and target loss. + +These are workpiece obligations where consequential, not mandatory fields on every statement. + +### Domain perspectives that are not automatically target concepts + +- **Actor:** may perform an Activity, decide a Policy, supply evidence, or be an Entity distinction. +- **Location:** may affect Boundary Condition, Entity state, Activity duration, Constraint, eligibility, or travel; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. +- **Resource:** combines an Entity distinction with availability, capacity, acquisition/release Activities, and contention Policy. +- **Trigger:** may be a Boundary Condition, Ordering Flow condition, Policy, Dynamics threshold, or Activity outcome. +- **Process failure:** may be an Activity outcome, event, alternative Ordering Flow, retry loop, Constraint violation, or terminal result. +- **Queue or waiting:** is explained by surrounding conditions and may emerge as construction structure rather than an independently elicited concept. +- **Scenario:** is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time. + +## What this shape makes easy + +- Seeing whether every distinction the target construction path may need has an explicit attention and checking address. +- Letting universal slice and sweep operations route directly to formalism-relevant Coverage concepts. +- Keeping target ontology, workpiece sufficiency, and construction consequences aligned. + +## What this shape makes harder + +- Finding material using the broad categories a process expert or colleague may naturally supply. +- Avoiding schema-shaped questioning when the formalism concepts are prominent. +- Representing actors, locations, resources, triggers, and failures that intentionally cross several target concepts without repeatedly translating them. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..be8b7db9b5c --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +# SDCPN Modelling + +Use one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit, maintain or revise the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and route any consequential gap back to elicitation. The current runtime may expose only one branch of that lifecycle in a conversation. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred. + +## Progressive guidance + +Before substantive elicitation or revision, read both references: + +1. `references/universal-elicitation.md` supplies universal progressive teaching. +2. `references/profile.md` adds the operational-process domain typology and SDCPN target-formalism profile. + +Both use the same additive registers: **Directives**, **Recognition**, **Operations**, **Coverage**, and **Verification**. Universal guidance applies first. Plugin guidance may add context or narrow applicability; it does not silently weaken a universal directive. Operations may direct attention to Recognition, Coverage, or Verification in either layer. + +Read `templates/workpiece.md` when creating or substantially revising the workpiece. Read `references/pn-construction.md` and `references/checks.md` only when preparing to construct, constructing, or checking a net. + +## Runtime branches + +### Interactive elicitation or revision + +Use the universal reference, plugin profile, and workpiece template. Maintain and deliver the recoverable workpiece. Construct only if the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation. + +### Construct-only execution + +Use the supplied workpiece as modelling input, read construction guidance and checks, and use the mounted construction tools. Do not interview. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in the construct-only conversation. + +## Lifecycle + +### Orient + +Establish the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, available time, and tolerance for proposed assumptions conversationally. Do not administer those concerns as an opening form. Identify one concrete case or disputed part of an existing model that can expose the first useful structure. + +Orientation is sufficient when there is enough purpose and context to select one focused next question. It need not settle every concern before elicitation begins. + +### Elicit + +Follow a concrete case in the person's vocabulary. Use universal Operations to choose the next move and the plugin profile's Recognition and Coverage to understand what may matter. Coverage is an attention and workpiece contract, never question order. + +After each useful answer, re-evaluate the active gap. Continue the case, deepen one ambiguity, sweep one property, explore one exception, deposit and defer, or prepare to close. Do not turn the register order or workpiece headings into a questionnaire. + +### Maintain or revise the workpiece + +Treat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve exact expert evidence where it matters and distinguish it from normalized prose, agent inference, assumptions, unresolved alternatives, and omissions. + +When an existing workpiece or model is being analyzed or revised, first locate the disputed or changed material and its objective consequence. Preserve unrelated material unless the new evidence affects it. Distinguish a genuine correction from conflict or contextual coexistence; do not let two active statements represent one correction. + +Whenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit the full latest workpiece again before a construction handoff and before workpiece-only delivery, even when the last change seemed small. A delta is not recoverable. + +### Construct + +Construct only from a recoverable workpiece. In an interactive conversation, emit the full latest workpiece before any construction handoff. In a construct-only conversation, treat the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Read the construction and checks resources before beginning. If mounted Petrinaut tools are available, use them for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting net JSON. If the necessary tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes. + +Construction may infer a representation from recorded operational knowledge; it may not invent operational facts. Name inferences, approximations, defaults, and losses. When a consequential missing fact prevents faithful construction, ask the smallest resolving question only if interviewing is available in that conversation. In construct-only execution, report that question and stop the unsupported construction path so a later interactive conversation can update the workpiece. + +### Check and deliver + +Apply the universal and plugin Verification registers before any delivery. Apply the phase-specific checks only when construction was prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in all cases. Deliver a net only when the available tool path has produced and checked one. Name what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target could not represent. + +An explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the full latest workpiece and, if already available, the best checked net, with gaps and assumptions visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a0ea4003213 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md @@ -0,0 +1,124 @@ +# SDCPN Construction + +Read this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model. + +Construction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete. + +## Construction boundary + +Before constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case. If materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path. + +When Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit a free-form net JSON substitute. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net. + +## Mapping principles + +- Operational conditions in which things wait, remain available, or occupy a state may become places. +- Operational events and activities may become transitions, factored into start/progress/finish only when their timing or resource semantics require it. +- Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules may become arcs, guards, and priorities. +- A distinction among kinds of things may become a colour or typed element only when the recorded operation treats the distinction differently. +- Continuous change while no discrete event occurs may become dynamics on a real-valued element when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential. +- Initial populations, arrivals, calendars, and external inputs may become scenario state, parameters, or source transitions. +- Shared reusable resources are acquired, made unavailable while held, and released. Consumable inputs do not return. Read-only inputs remain available. +- A physical location becomes net structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a place. +- Waiting is derived from the conditions and activities around it. Do not create a queue node merely because the account says that something waits. +- Qualitative goals, political judgments, unsupported policies, data bindings, and validation criteria may remain workpiece-only and must be named as losses when the net cannot hold them. + +## Tool sequence when mounted + +1. Inspect the latest net definition before changing it. +2. Add only workpiece-supported types and tunable parameters. +3. Add places and transitions and establish their stable identifiers before connecting them. +4. Add connections using the tool's accepted arc schema and positive token multiplicities. +5. Re-inspect after each dependent stage and once at the end. +6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial. + +The exact tool names and payload schemas come from the mounted capabilities, not this reference. + +## Construction patterns + +Patterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts. + +### Timed work + +When an activity occupies time and that distinction matters, use a start event, an in-progress state, and a completion event. Duration may be constant, parameterized, sampled, or driven by recorded context. If only a typical value is known, retain it as a named approximation or parameter; do not invent a tail. + +Preserve what is occupied while work is in progress. A reserved resource is unavailable between start and completion and returns in the recorded state when work ends or fails. + +### Conditional or probabilistic outcome + +Represent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled completions or branches. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; retain a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition if one exists, or report the gap. + +A sampled value and its branch guards must implement the stated probability convention correctly. Do not reuse the predecessor draft's unchecked `sample >= probability-of-success` example, which would invert the usual probability under a uniform sample. + +### Contended resource + +Represent the available instances in a shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required count; competing work cannot use those instances while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available again. Preserve wear, qualification, location, or other changed state on return when operationally consequential. + +Compile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded. Otherwise report the missing rule. + +### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs + +- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records. +- **Reserved:** remove or otherwise lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release. +- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work. + +Confirm that target arc semantics actually implement the intended mode; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning. + +### Gate, release, or prerequisite + +Represent the observable condition that enables work and the event or actor that changes it. A relative-time approximation such as “about two days before” should not replace a recorded practiced condition. External conditions may belong in scenario inputs rather than the core process net. + +### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement + +Represent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group must stay together and any recorded split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not assume a preferred batch size when only a maximum exists. + +### Mode change + +Represent setup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, or reconfiguration as a transition between modes when those modes change availability or behavior. Preserve directional time, material, scrap, capacity, and cascade losses; A-to-B and B-to-A are not interchangeable unless the workpiece supports that simplification. + +### Event and recovery + +Represent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Preserve occurrence, affected state, occupied resources, duration, recovery, retry, and terminal outcome as supported. One memorable event does not establish its rate. + +### Threshold on a changing quantity + +Represent the recorded quantity, direction and rate of change, variation if relevant, consequential threshold, triggered event, and reset. If crossing nothing changes and no objective observes the quantity, omit it or retain it only in the workpiece rather than adding unsupported dynamics. + +### Hidden waiting + +Derive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. The net may contain an intermediate place, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object. + +## Inference, approximation, and defaults + +Name each representational choice not stated directly in the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and how it could be checked. + +Potentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible: + +- collapsing several named micro-steps into one transition when no objective depends on their internal order; +- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value; +- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated question; +- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; +- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning. + +Not acceptable: + +- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic knowledge of operations; +- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values; +- interpreting “unknown” as a textbook distribution; +- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior; +- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; +- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without the corresponding tool evidence. + +## Existing-net analysis and bounded change + +Start from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before any mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and report the desired delta. + +Do not claim general net revision unless the mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With the current add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal operations. Never simulate replacement by adding competing places, transitions, arcs, types, or parameters beside obsolete ones. + +After any supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences moved, and which assumptions or losses were opened or closed. This is behavioral guidance, not a claim that an external harness computes an affected slice, guarantees unaffected structure, or enforces provenance automatically. + +## Construction losses + +Report workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without a usable metric, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification, and any operational gap that prevented construction. + +A loss remains part of the delivered workpiece. It does not disappear because the net parser accepts the result. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..90ec360f1c5 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md @@ -0,0 +1,268 @@ +# Operational-Process / SDCPN Profile + +This profile adds reusable operational-process domain typology and SDCPN target-formalism guidance to the universal elicitation reference. It contains no facts about a particular operation. Apply both layers under the same five registers; where this profile is silent, universal guidance still applies. + +The registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the workpiece may need to preserve for this purpose and target. SDCPN construction mechanics remain in the separately disclosed `references/pn-construction.md` resource. + +## Directives + +### Build the process description the purpose needs + +Elicit or revise an operational account that can support the person's stated simulation question or decision. Establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use. + +### Keep operational language in the foreground + +Ask about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, and target schemas are backstage construction concepts. They may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions. + +### Maintain the workpiece before the net + +The process-model workpiece is the recoverable account elicitation and revision maintain. Construction consumes it rather than rereading the transcript as the primary model. If a target distinction matters but the evidence is missing, preserve the gap in the workpiece instead of constructing a plausible default. + +### Preserve target-relevant context + +A value without its applicable entity, activity, direction, operating regime, calendar, load, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Do not average prescribed and practiced accounts or distinct operating conditions merely to obtain one parameter. + +### Separate evidence from precision + +A narrowly stated value is not necessarily well supported, and a well-supported account may remain broad. Preserve both what the person or source supports and how narrow the value is. Do not force a distribution, rate, or threshold below the granularity the operation can observe. + +### Treat patterns as hypotheses + +Operational situation patterns expose conditional information needs; they do not generate the process model. Ask whether a pattern is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary. + +### Keep elicitation and construction reversible + +Construction may reveal that a distinction is missing, ambiguous, or unrepresentable. Return to the smallest relevant question, update the workpiece, and reconstruct. Do not reinterpret the transcript silently to rescue a net. + +### Construct only through available authority + +When Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition govern net changes. When they are absent, prepare construction-ready workpiece material without claiming that a loadable or simulatable net exists. + +## Recognition + +Recognition entries name possibilities, not facts or automatic next steps. Confirm the operational meaning before recording or constructing it. + +### Language and account signals + +- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction between types of work or resource. +- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption with an occurrence pattern and duration, a blocked prerequisite, or an uncontrolled boundary input. +- **“We would,” “the procedure says,” or “you are supposed to”** may indicate prescribed behavior whose relationship to practice remains unknown. +- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, invariant, or unexamined exception. +- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a threshold, or a mode change with time, material, or capacity loss. +- **A duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone. +- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, or dataset named in passing** may participate as a performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, or merely contextual detail. +- **A place named in the account** may matter as a boundary, capacity, eligibility condition, source of travel time, state distinction, or resource. A physical location does not imply a Petri-net place. +- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than a normal process step. +- **A memorable failure** identifies a mechanism and consequence, not its probability. + +### Operational situation patterns + +#### Timed work + +A step occupies elapsed time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what is unavailable while it runs, whether duration is constant enough for the purpose, what variation or tail matters, and whether time depends on load, type, calendar, or resource availability. + +#### Probabilistic or conditional outcome + +A step is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the branch, what each branch produces, whether an observed rate exists, which conditions alter it, and what recovery follows. + +#### Contended resource + +Several activities want the same people, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or other limited capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, reservation and release, eligibility, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and a borderline case that exposes the real rule. + +#### Consumed, reserved, or read input + +A step uses an input in one of several materially different ways. It may consume or transform it, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities. + +#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement + +Work moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include what forms a group, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group. + +#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite + +Work becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external to the process, and what overrides it. + +#### Mode change + +Setup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, cascade effects, and the source of an unknown loss. + +#### Event rather than step + +A failure, interruption, deadline expiry, unplanned arrival, or external trigger befalls the operation rather than advancing its normal flow. Possible distinctions include occurrence, duration, affected work, effect on the case, recovery, and dependence on operating state. + +#### Threshold on a changing quantity + +A level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity crosses a consequential boundary. Possible distinctions include direction and rate of change, noise, what crossing triggers, which activity resets it, and whether several components combine or compete. + +#### Policy under pressure + +More than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions under which a different rule applies. + +#### Hidden waiting + +A gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, resource contention, calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically a node to elicit. + +#### Failure, retry, and recovery + +A case can fail to complete, repeat part or all of its work, enter an unhappy path, degrade, or recover. Possible distinctions include the entering condition, affected work and resources, outputs, rollback or compensation, retry limit, and terminal outcome. + +## Operations + +Use the universal Operations as the primary interviewing methods. These additions bind those methods to operational-process and SDCPN concerns. + +### Choose the case unit before slicing + +When several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow that unit from the event that admits it to the outcome that ends or hands it beyond the chosen boundary. + +### Link the slice to the objective + +As the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective still depends on nothing in the account, say that the supporting process is missing and continue the slice rather than collecting detached detail. + +### Expose the process spine + +Ask what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine. + +### Sweep operational concerns, not headings + +After the slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, type-dependent variation, practiced policy, failure/recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality. Do not march through every Coverage subsection merely because it exists. + +### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs + +For each load-bearing activity/input relation, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns. Use operational phrasing before target-formalism terms. + +### Sweep what can befall an activity + +Across the activities the slice exposed, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, resource unavailability, external event, and constraint violation. For each one the person recognizes, establish what happens to the work in hand, to the case, to occupied resources, and during recovery. + +### Test practiced policy with a borderline case + +When a document or general rule says who goes next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case. Preserve the prescribed account, practiced account, and the context that selects between them rather than averaging them. + +### Close a resource account + +For a contended resource, establish how many usable instances exist, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability. + +### Close a mode change in both directions + +Ask whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does. + +### Turn waiting into a causal question + +Ask what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or failure condition rather than naming a queue merely because waiting exists. + +### Ask what is conserved + +When quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a target-relevant constraint only when the person's account supports it. + +### Establish validation from observable behavior + +Ask what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Do not ask the person to predict the model's answer and store that prediction as process structure. + +### Re-enter from construction + +When construction cannot choose among materially different structures without inventing a fact, name the smallest missing operational distinction and formulate the question in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, deposit the question for a later elicitation and stop the unsupported construction path. + +## Coverage + +Coverage identifies what the workpiece may need for the stated objective and downstream SDCPN construction. It is not a questionnaire, a closed ontology, or a demand to populate irrelevant sections. + +### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds + +Preserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, or threshold the person can actually judge. An objective needs a traceable dependency on the operational account. Quantitative objectives may need metrics; qualitative objectives must not be forced into invented weights. + +Keep qualitative goals and trade-offs in the workpiece when the person cannot support a numerical measure. Construction guidance owns the later choice of target representation. + +### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions + +Preserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and reliability of boundary inputs. Distinguish a trigger from an ordinary activity and a prerequisite from a resource that the activity consumes. + +These concerns define the operational starting and enabling context. Construction guidance owns how that context is represented. + +### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources + +Preserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations affect behavior. A resource is a domain-facing role, not necessarily a separate target kind: its instances may be represented as typed elements subject to policy, capacity, and availability. + +A physical location deserves target representation only when the operation treats being there as consequential. Construction guidance owns the representational choice. + +### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use + +For each consequential activity, preserve its name in operational vocabulary, preconditions, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed/reserved/read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, occurrence if it is an event, mode-change loss, and variation by type or context. + +### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery + +Preserve the order activities occur, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery behavior, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes. Activities without stated order do not yet form a constructible process spine. + +### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior + +Preserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, dependence on type/load/calendar/state, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets. Keep unsupported precision broad or parameterized rather than manufacturing a distribution. + +### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes + +Preserve the rule applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds. Determine whether divergence is correction, unresolved conflict, or contextual coexistence. + +Construction later determines which rules are representable. Political judgment, unnamed exceptions, and unsupported conditions remain workpiece-only and must appear as losses rather than invented logic. + +### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings + +Preserve how the person would know the model is credible for its intended question, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, who or what is authoritative for missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable. + +Live data connections and qualitative validation may remain unsupported by the current target tooling; preserve them in the workpiece rather than implying implementation. + +### Cross-cutting evidence and uncertainty + +For every consequential concern, preserve the person's exact evidence where wording matters; normalized account; agent inference; assumption with reason and check; unknown, unasked, declined, or deferred material; unresolved conflict; correction; contextual variation; omission; and known target loss as applicable. These are workpiece obligations, not mandatory labels on every sentence. + +### Things not independently elicited as target nodes + +- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by the activities and conditions around it and may emerge as target structure during construction. +- A scenario is assembled for simulation from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies; it is not necessarily one elicited process element. +- A resource is an operational role that may combine entity distinctions, capacity, availability, and policy rather than requiring one universal target node shape. +- A location is operational context until its effect on state, eligibility, travel, capacity, boundary, or resource use is established. + +## Verification + +Use this register while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Read and apply `references/checks.md` when preparing to construct or delivering a net. + +### Purpose and spine + +- At least one simulation question, decision, or comparison is stated in the person's terms. +- The workpiece identifies a meaningful process boundary and at least one concrete case. +- The case has an explicit trigger or admission, ordered activities, branch conditions where present, and an outcome or handoff. +- Every objective depends on recorded process material or is visibly marked unsupported. + +### Resources and activity semantics + +- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. +- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where the objective needs it. +- Hidden waiting is explained through a prerequisite, availability, policy, calendar, batching, transport, or disruption when the evidence supports one. +- Mode-change losses preserve direction and context where they differ. + +### Time and uncertainty + +- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold preserves the context and precision the evidence supports. +- One incident has not silently become a frequency. +- A point value is used only when constancy or purpose-relative simplification is supported and named. +- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value. + +### Authorship and change + +- Exact expert evidence, normalized account, and agent inference remain distinguishable where consequential. +- A genuine correction leaves one active account while retaining enough history to explain the change. +- Conflict and contextual coexistence retain multiple accounts with their unresolved or selecting conditions. +- Unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred states are not conflated. + +### Construction readiness + +- Construction can identify what flows, what happens, in what order, what enables it, and what resources it occupies without inventing a missing process spine. +- Target-relevant gaps and unrepresentable material are explicit. +- The workpiece, not transcript memory, contains the information construction would use. +- Failure of one check returns to the smallest relevant Coverage concern or Operation; it does not license filling the gap from generic process knowledge. + +### Failure signals and repairs + +- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on the objective. +- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question. +- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use coverage. +- **Policy from paper:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence probe. +- **Point estimate as distribution:** one average stands for consequential variation. Restore the evidence-supported form and investigate typical versus tail only if the objective needs it. +- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies. +- **Net vocabulary in the interview:** questions are framed as places, transitions, or arcs. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7a268fe5f10 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +import { defineSkill } from "@flue/runtime"; + +import { universalElicitationReference } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent/flue"; + +import checks from "./checks.md?raw"; +import instructions from "./instructions.md?raw"; +import pnConstruction from "./pn-construction.md?raw"; +import profile from "./profile.md?raw"; +import workpieceTemplate from "./workpiece-template.md?raw"; + +/** One packaged skill composed explicitly from separately authored resources. */ +export const sdcpnModellingSkill = defineSkill({ + name: "sdcpn-modelling", + description: + "Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available.", + instructions, + files: { + "references/checks.md": checks, + "references/pn-construction.md": pnConstruction, + "references/profile.md": profile, + "references/universal-elicitation.md": universalElicitationReference, + "templates/workpiece.md": workpieceTemplate, + }, +}); diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0970e86c1da --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@ +# Process-Model Workpiece Template + +This domain-primary workpiece is maintained during elicitation and revision and consumed during construction. It is structurally organized but not a closed semantic claim system. Follow the person's thread during the conversation; do not read these headings aloud as a questionnaire. + +Keep one cold-readable current account. Preserve exact evidence, normalized interpretation, uncertainty, and construction notes without duplicating the same active fact across summaries. + +Use distinctions such as **Expert evidence**, **Working account**, **Agent inference**, **Assumed**, **Unknown**, **Not yet asked**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, **Conflict**, **Correction**, **Contextual variation**, **Omitted**, and **Loss** only where they carry information. They are not mandatory fields on every statement. + +Whenever this workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit the full latest document again before a construction handoff and before workpiece-only delivery. + +```markdown +# Process-Model Workpiece + +## Purpose and posture + +### What the model must answer, compare, or support + +### Who will use it and how + +### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation + +### Available time and assumption appetite + +### What the result must not claim + +## Operational account + +These are filing homes, not interview order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose; keep a consequential omission visible. Each active fact has one authoritative home. + +### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds + +### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state + +### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources + +### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use + +For each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; put its place in the ordered case only in the process-spine section below. + +### Case and process spine: flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery + +Give the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary. Begin with a concrete case: what admits it to the process, what flows, which named activities occur and in what order, what decisions or conditions change the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the case, and what outcome or handoff ends it. Reference activity and resource entries instead of restating their local details. + +#### Primary case: + +##### Trigger or admission + +##### Ordered account and references + +##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes + +##### Objective dependencies + +#### Additional or contrasting case: + +Add only when a different case exposes structure the primary case does not. + +### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior + +### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes + +### Validation evidence and data sources + +## Evidence and interpretation + +Keep evidence beside the affected process material where practical. Use this section for evidence that bears across several parts of the account or whose relationship requires explanation. + +### Exact expert evidence + +### Normalized account + +### Agent inferences and proposed structure + +## Open matters and authorship + +### Assumptions + +For each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked. + +### Unknown to the person + +### Not yet asked + +### Declined + +### Deferred and deposits + +For each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it. + +### Ambiguities and conflicts + +Preserve alternatives and the evidence for each. Do not choose or average without support. + +### Corrections + +State the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active. + +### Contextual coexistence + +Preserve accounts that differ by person, time, operating condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one. + +### Deliberate omissions and simplifications + +State what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong. + +## Construction notes + +Open this section when construction begins; do not use it to script ordinary elicitation. + +### Candidate target structures + +### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults + +### Questions reopened by construction + +### Target-representation losses + +## Delivery status + +### What this workpiece currently supports + +### Consequential gaps + +### Net status + +State whether no construction was attempted, construction is blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone. +``` + +## Maintenance guidance + +- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions. +- Update the authoritative case-and-process-spine section when ordering or case behavior changes; do not accumulate competing summaries. +- A restatement you offered remains your normalization even when accepted. Preserve exact evidence separately where origin matters. +- For a genuine correction, update the active account and note what changed. For unresolved conflict or contextual coexistence, keep the accounts separately visible. +- Empty sections may be removed when irrelevant. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, or **Omitted** only when that state itself matters to later work. +- Construction consumes this workpiece. If construction needs transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that point. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/README.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/README.md similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/README.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/README.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/assemblies/01-conservative.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/assemblies/01-conservative.md similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/assemblies/01-conservative.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/assemblies/01-conservative.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/assemblies/02-balanced.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/assemblies/02-balanced.md similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/assemblies/02-balanced.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/assemblies/02-balanced.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/assemblies/03-first-turn-guarded.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/assemblies/03-first-turn-guarded.md similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/assemblies/03-first-turn-guarded.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/assemblies/03-first-turn-guarded.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/assemblies/04-trust-contract-forward.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/assemblies/04-trust-contract-forward.md similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/assemblies/04-trust-contract-forward.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/assemblies/04-trust-contract-forward.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ciaran-eliciting-and-constructing.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/ciaran-eliciting-and-constructing.md similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ciaran-eliciting-and-constructing.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/ciaran-eliciting-and-constructing.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/exclusions-and-false-claims.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/exclusions-and-false-claims.md similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/exclusions-and-false-claims.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/exclusions-and-false-claims.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/old-job-runbooks.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/old-job-runbooks.md similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/old-job-runbooks.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/old-job-runbooks.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/authorship-and-uncertainty.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/sections/authorship-and-uncertainty.md similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/authorship-and-uncertainty.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/sections/authorship-and-uncertainty.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/divergence-and-revision.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/sections/divergence-and-revision.md similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/divergence-and-revision.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/sections/divergence-and-revision.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/identity-and-scope.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/sections/identity-and-scope.md similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/identity-and-scope.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/sections/identity-and-scope.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/objective-and-attention.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/sections/objective-and-attention.md similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/objective-and-attention.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/sections/objective-and-attention.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/question-shape.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/sections/question-shape.md similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/question-shape.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/sections/question-shape.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/skill-routing.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/sections/skill-routing.md similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/skill-routing.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/sections/skill-routing.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/stopping-and-partial-delivery.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/sections/stopping-and-partial-delivery.md similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/stopping-and-partial-delivery.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/sections/stopping-and-partial-delivery.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/vocabulary-and-thread.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/sections/vocabulary-and-thread.md similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/sections/vocabulary-and-thread.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/sections/vocabulary-and-thread.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/source-map.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/source-map.md similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompt/source-map.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/system-prompts/source-map.md From 75b7abe2b69c9a0ea0eb4edd27addfb286716466 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 15:08:45 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 025/101] two good draft prompting sets; domain-typology and target-formalism architecture pinned --- libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/AGENTS.md | 1 + libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/CONTEXT.md | 42 +-- libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md | 4 + libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md | 251 +++++++++++++++++- libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/README.md | 4 +- .../adr/0006-plugins-per-target-formalism.md | 2 +- ...hing-meets-plugin-content-at-fixed-keys.md | 5 +- .../docs/specs/elicitation-kernel.md | 18 +- .../docs/specs/plugin-contract.md | 42 +-- ...structurally-typed-elicitation-runbooks.md | 44 ++- .../packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/README.md | 2 + .../plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md | 2 +- .../sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md | 20 +- .../_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md | 10 +- .../five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md | 8 +- .../core/{flue.ts => flue.ts.example} | 0 .../{skill.ts => skill.ts.example} | 0 .../packages/core/schema/CHANGELOG.md | 10 + .../packages/core/schema/plugin.schema.json | 13 +- .../core/src/plugin/plugin-definition.ts | 6 +- .../packages/core/src/plugin/plugin.ts | 9 +- .../brunch-agent/packages/core/src/prompts.ts | 2 +- .../core/src/teaching/repertoire.yaml | 4 +- .../packages/core/src/testing/index.ts | 1 + .../core/test/plugin-definition.test.ts | 22 +- .../packages/core/test/slot-fixtures.ts | 1 + .../packages/plugin-gherkin/package.json | 2 +- .../packages/plugin-gherkin/plugin.yaml | 11 +- .../packages/plugin-gherkin/src/index.ts | 9 +- .../test/statement-noted.test.ts | 5 + .../packages/plugin-sdcpn/package.json | 2 +- .../packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml | 14 +- .../packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/index.ts | 6 +- .../src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/elicitation.md | 2 +- .../packages/plugin-sdcpn/test/plugin.test.ts | 3 +- 35 files changed, 415 insertions(+), 162 deletions(-) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/core/{flue.ts => flue.ts.example} (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/{skill.ts => skill.ts.example} (100%) diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/AGENTS.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/AGENTS.md index e35903393b9..7f466897af4 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/AGENTS.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/AGENTS.md @@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ on it, same as an ADR. - **Linear and GitHub writing:** follow [`docs/agents/issue-writing.md`](docs/agents/issue-writing.md) whenever creating or editing an issue, pull request, or comment. +- **Plugin scope:** each plugin pairs one reusable domain typology with one target formalism; it may name concepts from that typology but never facts or nouns from a concrete domain, organization, situation, or scenario. - **Topology gates** (enforced by tests): core and plugins may expose Flue-native production resources through dedicated `./flue` subpaths; plugins depend inward on core, never bindings, and never import `@hashintel/brunch-agent/prompts`; transport packages never depend on a binding; bindings translate generalized capture machinery into the selected substrate. Evaluation answer keys stay on the evaluation side, never inside interviewee or elicitor inputs. - **Posture:** prototype · stakes high — persisted capture data and merge gates must fail loudly, never corrupt silently · horizon: current milestone. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/CONTEXT.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/CONTEXT.md index cf19f933a35..188364041df 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/CONTEXT.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/CONTEXT.md @@ -18,10 +18,8 @@ the `ask` API, capture envelope, issue queue, sweep bookkeeping). Injected into narrow context; never owned by them. _Avoid_: kernel, core (as a prose shell name; the package path `packages/core` is exempt). -**Plugin** — the innermost shell: target-defining policy, one per **target formalism** and never -per domain. Authored as cells under harness-owned **keys**; receives capabilities by injection; -mechanism stays in the harness. -_Avoid_: extension, pack (a pack is a unit within a plugin). +**Plugin** — the innermost shell: reusable elicitation and modelling policy for one **domain typology** / **target formalism** pairing, never for a concrete **domain**, situation, or scenario. It owns how the typology is recognized and investigated and how the resulting knowledge is preserved, transformed, and checked for the formalism; mechanism stays in the harness. +_Avoid_: extension, pack (a pack is a unit within a plugin), formalism-only plugin. **Binding** — the substrate-facing adapter implementing the harness's named substrate-capability list (tool registration, instruction assembly, persistent state, affordance emission, @@ -31,19 +29,16 @@ _Avoid_: adapter, integration, wrapper. ## Sessions and durability -**Target formalism** — the artifact family a plugin projects into (Gherkin, SDCPN, assurance -arguments, BPMN); the unit a plugin is written for. +**Domain typology** — the reusable subject-matter concepts and recurring situations a plugin uses to recognize and investigate what may matter (for example, operational processes or software behavior). It is paired with a **target formalism** but does not contain facts or nouns from a concrete **domain**. +_Avoid_: domain, target-domain, use case, scenario. + +**Target formalism** — the artifact family a plugin projects into (Gherkin, SDCPN, assurance arguments, BPMN): the representational half of a plugin's pairing, not the plugin unit by itself. _Avoid_: target-domain; bare "target" where family vs instance is ambiguous. -**Domain** — the operational system the expert knows and the model describes (a packaging line, a -truck fleet). Unknown before the conversation; discovered during it; never a plugin unit, key, -row, or noun in a plugin definition. -_Avoid_: target-domain, use case. +**Domain** — the concrete system or situation the person knows and the model describes (a particular packaging line or truck fleet). Unknown before the conversation and discovered during it; never itself a plugin unit. Its facts populate the workpiece, while the plugin's **domain typology** supplies reusable ways to recognize and investigate them. +_Avoid_: domain typology, target-domain, use case. -**Target-document** — the durable unit sessions attach to: one target formalism, its capture -store, and its session history. Its authoritative state is the capture store plus session logs, -never the rendered artifact (renders are derived and disposable). Endures independently of any -session; completion is a derived status, not a write gate. +**Target-document** — the durable unit sessions attach to: one concrete domain under one plugin's domain-typology / target-formalism pairing, plus its capture store and session history. Its authoritative state is the capture store plus session logs, never the rendered artifact (renders are derived and disposable). Endures independently of any session; completion is a derived status, not a write gate. _Avoid_: spec, workpiece, case, target-output. **Session** — one substrate conversation: the full log of entries (user, agent, tool calls, @@ -144,29 +139,16 @@ retired ElicitationPack. **Demand row** — one row of a plugin's must-know table: a slot on a kind, its required precision, whether "not applicable" is accepted, and why the model needs it. Kind-level only. -**Pattern** — a discretionary, kind-indexed heuristic under a plugin's `patterns` key: a machine -trigger (declared kind, optionally one unsatisfied demanded slot), `when` text, and an `ask` -question. Never names a domain. +**Pattern** — a discretionary, kind-indexed heuristic under a plugin's `patterns` key: a machine trigger (declared kind, optionally one unsatisfied demanded slot), `when` text, and an `ask` question. It may use the plugin's domain typology but never names a concrete domain. -**Runbook** — the structurally typed, human-readable definition for eliciting and constructing -one **target formalism**. It pairs universal repertoire teaching with formalism-specific purpose, -investigation typologies, guidance, an IR template, transformation knowledge, completion, and -checks in a nested Markdown hierarchy. `kickoff`, `trajectory`, and `close` are lifecycle regions -inside the runbook, not its whole definition; the existing YAML field named `runbooks` keeps that -narrower code-level meaning. Structural headings do not require captures or IR contents to use -closed semantic types. Mission 3 delivers the first runbook through one Flue skill and disclosed -resources; that packaging is not part of the term's definition. +**Runbook** — the structurally typed, human-readable definition for eliciting and constructing through one plugin's **domain typology** / **target formalism** pairing. It pairs universal repertoire teaching with the plugin's purpose, investigation typology, target guidance, IR template, transformation knowledge, completion, and checks in a nested Markdown hierarchy. `kickoff`, `trajectory`, and `close` are lifecycle regions inside the runbook, not its whole definition; the existing YAML field named `runbooks` keeps that narrower code-level meaning. Structural headings do not require captures or IR contents to use closed semantic types. Mission 3 delivers the first runbook through one Flue skill and disclosed resources; that packaging is not part of the term's definition. **Key** — one fixed, harness-owned heading of the YAML plugin/repertoire precursor: the harness defines, teaches, and ships a default; a plugin specialises it in a cell. Four groups: contract data, guidance, runbook, machinery. Rendered key → harness default → plugin cell. Mission 3 mines this authoring structure as evidence; it does not restore the renderer as the runbook architecture. -**Repertoire** — generally applicable elicitation concepts, directives, procedures, judgment -activations, caveats, and failure knowledge: how an expert-knowledge interview goes well regardless -of target formalism. The current YAML is the harness's evidence-admitted filling of guidance and -lifecycle keys behind core's guarded `./prompts` subpath. A rendered runbook may incorporate this -teaching without using that runtime. +**Repertoire** — generally applicable elicitation concepts, directives, procedures, judgment activations, caveats, and failure knowledge: how an expert-knowledge interview goes well regardless of domain typology or target formalism. The current YAML is the harness's evidence-admitted filling of guidance and lifecycle keys behind core's guarded `./prompts` subpath. A rendered runbook may incorporate this teaching without using that runtime. **Mechanism type** — how a guidance key works on the interviewer: a **license** permits what the model would hedge on; a **technique** is a form of question or move; an **attention** key names diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md index 95ec82c17a5..48e3c8ce196 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md @@ -14,6 +14,10 @@ Later projection, provenance, bounded revision, observer, host-continuity, and o **Observed strain:** the app-local `ChatAgent` mixed the core Brunch prompt, SDCPN steering and runbook resources, SDCPN construction tools, Petrinaut host tools, and transport conventions, making none of their package authorities visible. **Local obligation:** follow Flue's native distinction between the agent's returned core instructions, `useInstruction` contributions, progressively disclosed `useSkill` resources, and `useTool` capabilities while exposing core and SDCPN ownership directly. **Alternatives:** preserving a substrate-neutral core would have kept agent composition in `binding-flue`, contrary to the intended split; making core and plugin Flue-native keeps the app as the required directive-marked registration and host composition point. **Owner acceptance:** the owner explicitly selected the Flue-native core/plugin alternative before implementation, then clarified that core must remain deployable in any context and for any output formalism: SDCPN and Petrinaut model-facing identity, guidance, and tools belong to plugin-sdcpn, while browser execution and transport remain app-owned. This decision relocates the existing instrument without changing its runbook semantics and does not reactivate the generalized repertoire/`useElicitation()` runtime. +### Accepted design decision — plugins pair a domain typology with a target formalism + +**Observed strain:** the formalism-only plugin definition left the reusable operational-process typology with no honest owner, even though SDCPN Recognition, Coverage, Operations, and Verification depend on both that subject-matter typology and the target representation. **Local obligation:** make each plugin carry one reusable domain typology / target formalism pairing while preserving the boundary between reusable typology and concrete user domain. **Alternatives:** keeping plugins formalism-only would scatter domain-typology guidance into core or the app; making plugins per concrete domain would bake scenario nouns into reusable teaching. **Owner acceptance:** the owner selected the paired plugin model. `plugin-sdcpn` carries operational processes plus SDCPN; `plugin-gherkin` carries software behavior plus Gherkin. Concrete operations, organizations, situations, and scenarios remain conversation/workpiece content, never plugin units. + ## Imperative Manually reshape the technically viable Mission 3 elicitation runbook and Markdown workpiece into a stronger, research-informed candidate that the owner understands and endorses one consequential decision at a time. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md index 121680255c8..eb13a3e5eb7 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Plausible future missions are the ordered `# Mission N — …` headings. Impera Archived Mission 2 is the mechanical capture pipe. Mission 3 is closed with a split result: the real Flue runbook and elicitation-to-workpiece path is the accepted control, while real-model semantic construction failed at the provider-schema boundary. Its frozen prospective campaign contains one invalid runtime member and two valid independently graded members; the campaign adjudication is the comparison input, not permission to rewrite observed artifacts. -Live Mission 4 is the owner-led runbook/workpiece redesign in [`MISSION.md`](MISSION.md), tracked by FE-1563. Do not implement another numbered cluster on this branch. The detailed Mission 5–7 clusters below are provisional based on current evidence; Mission 4's manual redesign may alter their workpiece assumptions and join contracts before they are cut. +Live Mission 4 is the owner-led runbook/workpiece redesign in [`MISSION.md`](MISSION.md), tracked by FE-1563. Do not implement another numbered cluster on this branch. The detailed Mission 5–8 clusters below are provisional based on current evidence; Mission 4's manual redesign may alter their workpiece assumptions and join contracts before they are cut. ```text M1 chat (done) M2 mechanical capture (archived) M3 runbook/workpiece (closed) @@ -14,7 +14,8 @@ M4 owner-led, research-informed runbook/workpiece redesign (live) FE-1476 delivery spine ├─ M5 traceable prebuilt workpiece → live SDCPN → provenance answer beats 1–3 ├─ M6 bounded reviewer re-elicitation → revised workpiece → scoped patch beats 4–5 -└─ M7 whole-story rehearsal → optimisation handoff beat 6 +├─ M7 whole-story rehearsal → optimisation handoff beat 6 +└─ M8 image/infra contract → restricted smoke → gated remote release container work may run in parallel; public join follows the exercised path Other asynchronous evidence tracks, admitted only when their boundary is stable ├─ provider-visible Petrinaut schema path @@ -322,6 +323,252 @@ The completed artifact need not represent every Vestera fact. It must carry a co - Stop if optimisation runs against a net that passed only parser shape and not the workpiece-specific semantic checks. - Stop if deployment bypasses the ratified remote-release gates. +# Mission 8 — containerize and safely deploy Brunch on HASH infrastructure + +This cluster is the self-contained candidate successor for the deployment work currently tracked by FE-1441 and gated by FE-1423. It records the 2026-09-01 application and monorepo audit rather than assuming that “there is a Docker container” is the whole deployment contract. Container correctness, a restricted infrastructure smoke deployment, and public remote release are distinct thresholds. Container and infrastructure-contract work may proceed in a separate worktree while Missions 5–7 establish the product path, but the public routing/release join must consume the exercised path rather than inventing one in deployment. A cut may narrow to the first two thresholds only if the result is explicitly private and disposable; it may not call that public deployment or silently inherit the later gates. + +The least deployment shape is a long-running Node/Flue HTTP service on HASH infrastructure, initially one live replica, with Anthropic egress and durable conversation storage. The public product path remains Petrinaut panel → AI SDK HTTP transport → Brunch Flue `ChatAgent`; Brunch remains a second assistant rather than replacing the stock Petrinaut modeller. HASH Graph, Temporal, Redis, the HASH API, S3, and Petrinaut Optimizer are not current Brunch runtime dependencies and must not be added for symmetry. + +The current repository does not contain production Terraform, ECS task definitions, load balancer configuration, runtime secret declarations, or backup policy. It contains local Compose and a GitHub workflow that builds/publishes known images and force-redeploys pre-existing ECS services. Infrastructure provisioning therefore remains a handoff to Tim's infrastructure authority or another repository; this mission must record the external artifact and owner rather than pretending a workflow catalog entry creates the service. + +## Observed starting point + +These are high-confidence facts observed at the real local boundary unless a qualification says otherwise. + +- `yarn workspace @apps/brunch-agent build` emits `dist/server.mjs`, the server chunk, `dist/app.mjs`, and a built browser client under `dist/client/`. Starting `node apps/brunch-agent/dist/server.mjs` with a temporary `PORT` succeeded, bound `*:PORT`, served `/` with HTTP 200, and created SQLite `conversations.db`, `-wal`, and `-shm` files. This proves the generated Node entry can start; it does not prove container correctness, provider calls, restart recovery, remote safety, or deployment infrastructure. +- The generated server reads `PORT`, defaults to `3000`, installs graceful `SIGINT`/`SIGTERM`/disconnect handling, and gives shutdown up to 60 seconds. The development-only Vite listener at `127.0.0.1:4321` is not the production listen contract. +- The emitted server is not standalone. Running a copied `dist/` directory without the production dependency graph failed on the external `@flue/runtime` import. A runtime image must retain the focused production Node dependencies and built workspace packages, not copy `dist/` alone. +- `apps/brunch-agent/package.json` has `build` but no `start` or `build:docker` task. There is no `apps/brunch-agent/docker/Dockerfile`, Compose service, deploy-workflow catalog entry, ECS registration, or `/health` route. +- The root `.dockerignore` excludes general Markdown. Brunch's production graph imports `packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md?raw` and the SDCPN `SKILL.md` plus its sibling resources. A repository-root Docker build will omit required production inputs unless narrow exceptions admit the core system prompt and `packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/*.md`. The existing Petrinaut user-guide Markdown exception does not cover these files. +- `src/db.ts` configures Flue's canonical conversation store with Node SQLite. `BRUNCH_DEV_DB_PATH` can move the file; absent an override it writes under the application package's `.data-wipe-me/` directory. The adapter starts in WAL mode and provisions/verifies Flue tables at boot. +- Brunch's capture machinery is a second persistence concern: `applyCaptureSweep` uses `createLocalCaptureStore` to write one JSON document per Flue instance beside the conversation database. The current runbook/workpiece production path does not invoke that capture pipe, so migrating it merely because the interface exists may be speculative; any remote path that does invoke it must not leave those files ephemeral. +- The model provider is statically restricted to Anthropic in `flue.config.ts`. Normal turns require `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY`; `BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL` defaults to `claude-haiku-4-5`. The direct provider normally calls `api.anthropic.com` over HTTPS unless its standard base URL is deliberately overridden. +- `app.ts` registers `createOpenTelemetryInstrumentation({ content: false })`, but no Node OTel SDK/exporter currently sends spans to HASH's collector. Instrumentation registration is not operational telemetry. +- The browser-facing AI SDK door is `GET | POST | OPTIONS /api/chat`. It accepts `x-brunch-principal`, the conversation id, and AI SDK message bodies, and emits an AI SDK UI-message stream. Internal history reads and dispatch use in-process `app.fetch`; the Petrinaut `/api/chat` path does not need a public network hop to the mounted Flue route. +- The mounted `/agents/chat/:id` route requires `x-brunch-principal` and `x-brunch-conversation` and checks that they derive the path instance id. This is ownership consistency, not authentication: the browser currently mints the principal UUID in localStorage, and a caller can self-assert one. The bundled debug UI at `/` uses the fixed principal `local` and can start billable model turns if exposed. +- `BRUNCH_PETRINAUT_ORIGINS` is an exact comma-separated CORS allowlist. Its defaults admit only the local Petrinaut ports. CORS does not authenticate non-browser callers or prevent direct abuse. +- `apps/petrinaut-website` currently owns its production `/api/chat` with the stock modeller. Only the Brunch local Vite configuration removes that handler and proxies the route to Brunch. A remote service URL alone does not connect the production panel, and replacing that route wholesale would violate the locked second-assistant decision. +- HASH's deploy workflow treats its embedded service catalog as the build/publication/redeployment registry. Package-based change detection looks for `build:docker`, builds repository-root Dockerfiles on native arm64 and amd64 runners, publishes arm64 ECR images and multi-arch GHCR manifests, and then calls `aws ecs update-service --force-new-deployment` for already-created services. It does not create ECR, ECS, IAM, networking, DNS, secrets, databases, target groups, or backups. + +## Service and communication contract + +```text +Petrinaut browser + → selected same-origin proxy or explicitly allowed Brunch origin + → Brunch POST/GET /api/chat (long-lived streamed response) + → in-process Flue ChatAgent route and conversation coordinator + → Anthropic HTTPS API + → response stream back to Petrinaut + +Brunch process + → durable Flue conversation/submission store + → Brunch capture store only on paths that actually invoke capture + → OTel collector after an exporter is wired +``` + +| Boundary | Direction | Current requirement | Confidence and flexibility | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | +| Petrinaut panel | Browser → Brunch | `GET`, `POST`, and `OPTIONS /api/chat`; streamed AI SDK response; principal and conversation identity | High that this is the product door. Low on same-origin proxy versus separate origin, picker location, and exact public path. | +| Direct Flue route | Browser/diagnostics → `/agents/chat/:id` | Required by the bundled debug UI and diagnostics, but not by Petrinaut's `/api/chat` network path | High that broad public exposure is unnecessary for the panel. Whether to keep it private, authenticate it, or omit it from public ingress is a cut-time decision. | +| Anthropic | Brunch → provider HTTPS | `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY`; model selected by `BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL` | High. A provider proxy or Bedrock path would be a separate product/provider decision, not infra substitution. | +| Durable database | Brunch → storage | State must survive process and task replacement before release | High on durability; medium that Postgres is the selected mechanism because FE-1441 says so and HASH has it, but the current code has no Postgres adapter. | +| OTel collector | Brunch → telemetry backend | Remote failures, model/tool spans, duration, usage, and attributable conversation identity must be inspectable without prompt content by default | High as a release gate; medium on exact SDK/bootstrap package and environment variable names until HASH's collector convention is checked. | +| Other HASH services | — | No current call | High. Do not introduce Graph, Temporal, Redis, API, S3, Kratos, or Petrinaut Optimizer as runtime dependencies unless a concrete auth/storage/routing decision requires one. | + +## Application-owned deployment surface + +The Brunch branch should own the executable artifact and its behavioral contract, not infrastructure resource creation. + +- Add `apps/brunch-agent/docker/Dockerfile` using the repository root as context and the repository-locked Node `22.21.1`. Follow the existing Turbo-prune graph via `.github/scripts/prune-scopes.sh '@apps/brunch-agent'`, immutable Yarn install, dependency builds, and `turbo build --filter '@apps/brunch-agent' --env-mode=loose`. +- Keep only the production dependency closure and built workspace outputs in the runner where practical. Existing HASH Node images copy the whole pruned tree, while `petrinaut-opt` demonstrates a focused production runtime; either shape is acceptable if the image proves all external imports and skill resources are present. Image slimness is subordinate to a correct first container. +- Add narrow `.dockerignore` exceptions for the production Markdown inputs. Do not broadly re-admit all Brunch research, mission, evidence, or evaluation Markdown into the image. +- Run `node dist/server.mjs` through an explicit `start` script or direct exec-form container command. The stable contract is the generated `dist/server.mjs`, not the hashed server chunk or `dist/app.mjs` loader. +- Run as a dedicated non-root user, set `NODE_ENV=production`, use an init process or platform init, and create only the writable directory the selected persistence mode needs. Never require write access to the source tree. +- Add an unauthenticated, cheap liveness route such as `/health`; do not use `/`, which reads a UI asset and carries product behavior. Startup should fail before readiness when required storage migration/connection fails. The liveness response should not make a billable Anthropic call or require every external dependency to be healthy. +- Add `build:docker` so the existing affected-package machinery can see Brunch, and add a container smoke test that starts the image, observes health, exercises the built skill/resource presence, and proves the process writes only to approved writable locations. The existing build-artifact tests remain necessary but do not prove the Docker context. +- Add a deploy-workflow catalog entry only after the target image names and pre-provisioned ECS service identifiers are agreed with infra. Local Compose parity is optional unless it reveals or protects a real deployment contract; do not make Compose a ceremonial requirement. +- Document the runtime variables, secrets, ingress, egress, persistence, shutdown, and recovery contract beside the application. Do not bake secrets or environment-specific public URLs into build args or image layers. + +## Infrastructure-owned deployment surface + +Tim or the owning infrastructure repository must provide or explicitly decline each relevant resource. This checkout cannot evidence their implementation. + +- Image repository and pull permissions for the selected ECR/GHCR publication path. Current HASH convention publishes both; ECR-only is sufficient for ECS if public GHCR distribution has no consumer. +- A pre-provisioned ECS task definition and service, selected cluster, execution/task roles, runtime secret injection, security groups, private networking, outbound DNS/HTTPS to Anthropic, and database network access. Existing names under `h-stage-euc1-app` are precedent, not authority for the Brunch target. +- ALB or equivalent routing, TLS, DNS, target-group health check, idle timeout suitable for model/tool streaming, request-size controls, access logging, and the chosen public/private exposure boundary. +- Postgres database/schema/role and connection secret if Postgres remains selected, including encryption, network restriction, backup retention, point-in-time recovery expectations, and an exercised restore path appropriate to the release stakes. +- OTel collector reachability and the organization-approved service/resource attributes, retention, dashboards, and alert destinations. +- Deployment strategy and stop/drain settings compatible with Flue's one-live-owner rule and the generated server's 60-second graceful-shutdown window. +- CPU, memory, ephemeral disk, desired count, autoscaling, and cost alarms based on a measured representative conversation. No current evidence supports a numeric CPU/memory request or concurrency target. + +## Joint application/infra decisions + +These boundaries cannot be settled correctly by either side alone. + +### Restricted smoke versus public release + +A private smoke deployment may use one ECS task behind VPN, Cloudflare Access, an internal ALB, or another independently enforced boundary. It may temporarily use task-local SQLite only if restart loss is intentional, no durable user promise is made, and the environment is labelled disposable. An EFS-backed SQLite singleton is technically plausible but unproven here and should not become an accidental production architecture merely because it postpones Postgres work. + +Public exposure requires the remote-release properties below. A working image, HTTP 200, CORS allowlist, obscure conversation id, or browser-minted UUID does not discharge them. + +### Identity, authentication, and authorization + +Per-conversation ownership enforcement is non-negotiable; the identity source is flexible. The present code proves that a principal plus conversation id can derive and guard a Flue instance, but it trusts a caller-supplied principal. FE-1439's issue text calls the browser UUID sufficient for an accepted demo threat model and says it discharges the authentication gate, while FE-1423 and this draft's standing constraints still say no remote exposure while authentication is open. That policy conflict must be resolved explicitly before cutting or releasing this mission. + +Candidate identity sources include existing HASH/Ory identity, a server-issued unforgeable anonymous session, or a restricted-preview access identity. The mission should not preselect Kratos merely because HASH uses it elsewhere. Whatever wins must establish the server-side principal, bind each conversation to it, reject cross-principal reads and writes, and preserve that binding through restart. CORS remains a browser-origin control, never the authentication mechanism. + +### Front door and Petrinaut routing + +The production Petrinaut site already uses `/api/chat` for the stock assistant. Brunch must remain independently selectable and the stock assistant must remain functional when Brunch is unavailable. Same-origin path routing is attractive because it simplifies browser policy, but it creates a route-selection contract at the Petrinaut host. A separate Brunch origin avoids the path collision but requires explicit CORS, credentials/identity propagation, and another public hostname. The first public cut must name which topology it proves and how the panel selects it; infrastructure should not guess from the local proxy. + +Only routes needed by that topology should be reachable through public ingress. In particular, decide whether `/`, `/assets/*`, and `/agents/chat/:id` are disabled, access-controlled, or internal. The bundled debug UI's fixed `local` principal is a release blocker if the root remains public without a stronger front door. + +### Rate limits and cost controls + +FE-1441 names per-principal and per-IP rate limits. The properties are higher confidence than the mechanism or thresholds: one caller must not exhaust provider budget; retries and reconnects must not be charged as independent abuse; legitimate long conversations must remain usable; and rejected requests must be observable without recording sensitive prompt content. Enforcement could live in WAF/ALB, an authenticated gateway, the application, or a deliberate combination. In-memory counters are not durable or replica-safe. Exact request, token, concurrency, and spend limits require representative traffic and an owner-set budget rather than invention in the infrastructure manifest. + +### Streaming and availability + +Flue's Node target is a long-running service with an in-process coordinator and long-lived conversation reads; do not deploy it as Lambda, a short-lived function, or scale-to-zero. The server itself sets no request timeout. The proxy idle timeout must tolerate the longest expected silent model/tool interval or the client reconnection protocol must be proven across that timeout. The current Petrinaut Vercel function permits five minutes, which is useful precedent but not an earned ALB value. + +One replica is the least honest first deployment. Shared Postgres enables replacement recovery but does not by itself permit active-active handling of the same conversation. Before desired count exceeds one, prove how requests for one instance reach one live owner. Before a rolling singleton deployment is called durable, prove the overlap/drain behavior: ECS may start a replacement while the old task still owns work, while stopping old-first trades ownership safety for downtime. Deployment percentages, sticky routing, leases, and reconnect behavior remain design fog until exercised. + +## Persistence, migration, and recovery contract + +FE-1441 records Postgres as the intended HASH deployment store, but current implementation and current product usage make the exact application scope less certain than the infrastructure requirement suggests. + +- Flue canonical conversations, accepted submissions, and persisted state are active production data. Their store must survive process restart and ECS task replacement. The selected Flue Postgres adapter should provision/version its own tables at startup and refuse incompatible formats rather than continue ambiguously. +- Brunch capture documents are application data behind `CaptureStore`, not Flue records. If the deployed path invokes capture, a Postgres-backed implementation or another explicitly durable implementation must preserve owner-key refusal, atomic command semantics, format validation, and session-log/capture consistency. If the deployed Mission 8 path still never invokes capture, do not build a speculative Postgres capture subsystem merely to satisfy an old topology sketch; record that capture is inactive and make enabling it conditional on durable storage. +- A restart proof must distinguish process restart on one task, task replacement on another host, interrupted accepted work, reconnecting stream, and database restoration. Passing only the first is not “restart durability” on ECS. +- Schema/version policy must say which changes migrate, which refuse startup, who runs or authorizes migration, and how rollback behaves when old and new tasks overlap. Flue's internal format migration does not settle Brunch capture schema policy. +- Backup policy must identify the backed-up state, retention, encryption, access, restore owner, recovery-point objective, and recovery-time expectation at the level the deployment owner actually accepts. “RDS has backups” without a restore expectation is not evidence. +- Conversation content contains expert operational knowledge and is sent to Anthropic, stored in the database, and potentially represented in logs/traces/backups. Retention, deletion, access, provider/data-region policy, and incident handling are owner decisions that constrain infra. OTel content remains off by default until an explicit privacy policy permits otherwise. + +## Runtime configuration candidates + +| Name | Role | Secret? | Current status and flexibility | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | +| `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY` | Authenticates model calls | Yes | Required for useful turns; inject at runtime from the approved secret store, never as a build arg. | +| `PORT` | HTTP listen port | No | Supported now; defaults to `3000`. Infra may select another port if task, target group, health check, and docs agree. | +| `NODE_ENV` | Production runtime behavior | No | Set to `production`. | +| `BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL` | Anthropic model id | No | Optional; default `claude-haiku-4-5`. Release should pin an accepted model deliberately rather than inherit a default unnoticed. | +| `BRUNCH_PETRINAUT_ORIGINS` | Exact browser CORS allowlist | No | Required for a direct or Origin-bearing browser call. Values depend on the chosen preview/public host topology. No wildcard. | +| `BRUNCH_TRANSPORT_AISDK_INSPECT` | Structured transport diagnostics to stdout | No | Optional and off by default. Decide whether emitted metadata is appropriate for production logs before enabling. | +| `BRUNCH_DEV_DB_PATH` | Current SQLite file path | No | Useful only for local/private singleton storage. The development-named variable should not become a permanent public persistence contract by accident. | +| `BRUNCH_CHAT_DB_PATH` | Hermetic test database override | No | Test-only in the current design; do not configure in production. | +| Postgres connection variable | Flue and possibly capture-store database connection | Yes | Not implemented. `DATABASE_URL` is Flue documentation precedent, not a current Brunch input; settle naming with the chosen adapter and HASH secret convention. | +| OTel endpoint/resource variables | Export telemetry to HASH collector | Usually no, possibly authenticated | Not implemented. Verify whether HASH expects standard `OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_*`, existing `HASH_OTLP_ENDPOINT`, or an application bootstrap; do not set variables that no SDK reads. | +| Authentication configuration | Establish trusted server-side principal | Likely partly secret | Unsettled. Depends on Ory, gateway, anonymous session, or restricted-preview decision. | + +## Operational visibility and health + +Remote release must make failures and cost attributable without turning user conversations into ambient logs. + +- Wire a real Node OTel SDK/exporter or the approved HASH bootstrap around the existing Flue instrumentation, and verify one model turn, tool call, settlement failure, duration, token usage, and cost reach the collector with stable service, deployment, model, submission, and conversation correlation. `gen_ai.conversation.id` should equal the Flue instance id unless an accepted telemetry convention says otherwise. +- Keep `content: false` initially. Verify prompts, responses, tool arguments/results, provider keys, database URLs, and raw authorization material do not appear in traces, logs, health responses, or deployment metadata. Any later content capture needs a retention/access/redaction decision. +- Decide whether incoming `traceparent` should cross `/api/chat`; current dispatch does not propagate it. This is useful for Petrinaut-to-Brunch correlation but is not permission to delay a basic remote-failure floor. +- Emit and alert on process startup failure, database migration/connect failure, failed submission settlement, provider authentication/rate-limit/error outcomes, abnormal stream termination, task restart loops, latency, token/cost budget, database capacity, and absence of expected traffic where appropriate. Exact dashboards and thresholds remain infra/product decisions. +- `/health` should prove process liveness cheaply. Readiness may be represented by successful startup because Flue connects/migrates storage before listening, or by a separate endpoint if HASH orchestration requires it. Do not make health depend on a paid provider request. Document what the chosen probe does and does not establish. + +## CI, publication, and deployment wiring + +The repository-side path should converge with the existing workflow rather than create a second image pipeline. + +1. Add `start` and `build:docker` tasks to `@apps/brunch-agent` so local use and affected-package detection name the production contract. +2. Add the root-context Dockerfile and narrow `.dockerignore` exceptions. +3. Build and smoke-test the image on the architectures the workflow will publish. A local host build alone does not establish arm64 runtime correctness. +4. Add the deploy service-catalog entry with `package: "@apps/brunch-agent"`, `service: "brunch-agent"`, root context, Dockerfile path, selected registries, and only the ECS service identifiers that infra has actually provisioned. +5. Record the external infrastructure location and identifiers: account/region, cluster/service/task family, image repository, hostname/path, target group/health path, database/schema/role, secret references, collector, backup policy, and deployment owner. Do not put secret values in the repository. +6. Exercise an immutable image build, restricted deployment, health transition, one representative streamed conversation, process restart, task replacement, failed provider call visibility, and rollback behavior at the selected threshold before widening exposure. + +A local Compose entry is useful only if it exercises the same image/configuration and catches a real gap. Updating the obsolete-looking `load-docker-images` action is unnecessary unless a current consumer is found; no current workflow references it. + +## Confidence map + +### High confidence — observed or owner/issue-settled + +- Brunch is a long-running Flue Node service, not a serverless function, and `dist/server.mjs` is the generated production entry. +- The runtime image requires production Node dependencies and built workspace outputs in addition to `dist/`. +- The Docker build needs repository-root context and explicit admission of production Markdown prompt/skill files. +- The current product door is Petrinaut's AI SDK `/api/chat`, with long-lived streamed responses. +- Anthropic is the only current model-provider dependency; no current Graph, Temporal, Redis, HASH API, S3, or optimizer dependency exists. +- The current SQLite/JSON state is not sufficient for ordinary replaceable ECS tasks without a separately accepted persistent-filesystem singleton design. +- Public exposure is forbidden until conversation authorization, remote telemetry, state versioning/backup, and restart durability hold. The public debug root cannot safely retain its fixed `local` identity without another access boundary. +- The stock Petrinaut assistant must remain available and its conversation history must not be spliced with Brunch history. +- The existing deploy workflow can build/publish/redeploy Brunch only after both repository catalog wiring and external ECS provisioning exist. + +### Medium confidence — plausible first mechanisms, not yet proved + +- Postgres is the best production store because FE-1441 records it, HASH already operates it, and Flue documents a Postgres adapter. The exact capture-store scope and schema remain unproved. +- One ECS task behind an ALB, with Postgres and no autoscaling, is the least mechanism for the first durable restricted deployment. +- Same-origin proxying from Petrinaut is likely simpler than a separate browser origin, but it competes with the stock `/api/chat` route and needs the product mode-selection contract. +- Per-principal plus per-IP rate limiting is a useful abuse floor from FE-1441, but its layer, persistence, and thresholds need the selected identity and traffic model. +- A liveness-only `/health`, storage-gated startup, and content-free Flue OTel spans match existing HASH service conventions, but exact readiness and collector bootstrap need infra confirmation. +- ECR publication and the existing staging app cluster are likely deployment conventions. GHCR publication, cluster name, hostname, and production promotion are flexible until Tim confirms consumers and environment ownership. + +### Low confidence — must alter the first move or remain visible + +- Whether the target of the next branch is a private smoke deployment, an authenticated preview, or public production. These have different required gates and should not be averaged. +- Whether a browser-minted UUID remains an accepted anonymous demo identity or FE-1423 requires real authenticated identity. Issue history and current standing constraints are not fully consistent. +- Whether to migrate only active Flue conversation state first or both Flue and currently inactive Brunch capture state in one mission. +- The exact Postgres database/schema tenancy, driver, pool sizing, migration/rollback policy, backup retention, and restore objectives. +- The Petrinaut routing shape: same-origin selected path, separate hostname, backend proxy, or another mode boundary; also whether selection may change mid-net. +- Which public routes remain reachable and whether the bundled debug UI ships at all. +- The authentication authority and token/cookie propagation mechanism. +- Rate-limit, request-size, concurrent-turn, token, and spend thresholds, and whether WAF/gateway/application share enforcement. +- CPU, memory, disk, concurrency, autoscaling, availability, and cost targets. No load evidence currently supports numbers. +- ALB idle timeout, stream reconnection behavior under silent provider intervals, rolling-deployment overlap, task-drain behavior, and multi-replica conversation ownership. +- HASH's exact Node OTel bootstrap and environment vocabulary, incoming trace propagation, telemetry retention, and alert thresholds. +- Where the infrastructure source of truth lives. This checkout has no production Terraform/task definitions despite labeler references to `infra/terraform/**`. +- Data retention, deletion, residency, access, provider terms, and whether backups/traces may contain customer operational knowledge. + +## Constraints already earned + +- Do not expose Brunch remotely merely because an image starts. A restricted smoke must remain access-controlled and explicitly labelled; public release must satisfy the remote gates. +- Do not treat the caller-supplied principal, conversation hash, CORS, or an unguessable id as authentication. +- Do not replace or destabilize the stock Petrinaut assistant, splice histories, or rewrite the panel onto `@flue/react` to simplify deployment. +- Do not add Graph, Temporal, Redis, HASH API, Kratos, or another platform dependency without a selected boundary that requires it. +- Do not put provider/database/auth secrets in Docker build args, image layers, repository files, logs, or health responses. +- Do not invent a second image/redeployment pipeline while the existing service catalog can carry the package. +- Do not copy only `dist/`, omit production Markdown, run as root, require a writable source tree, or rely on a package-local ephemeral database while claiming replacement durability. +- Do not infer active-active safety from shared Postgres. Keep one live replica until ownership/routing is proved. +- Do not turn the inactive capture path into a speculative Postgres subsystem unless the deployed throughline consumes it; if it is consumed, do not leave it on local JSON. +- Keep trace content off until privacy, retention, and access policy are accepted. Operational observability must not depend on exporting prompts. +- Preserve the current Node/Flue happy path and generated server lifecycle rather than wrapping it in a custom HTTP process manager. + +## Fog-line + +Resolve these at the smallest real deployment boundary before cutting beyond them: + +- What exposure threshold is actually being requested: infra-only image handoff, private smoke, authenticated preview, or public release? +- What exact remote threat model and identity policy does the owner accept, given the conflict between the browser-UUID demo posture and the still-open authentication gate? +- Which hostname/path and Petrinaut mode-selection mechanism route to Brunch without stealing the stock `/api/chat` contract? +- Which routes must be public, internal, or absent? +- Does the selected throughline invoke Brunch capture persistence, or only Flue conversation/workpiece history? Which state must Postgres own in this mission? +- Where does the infrastructure source live, and which ECS cluster/service, image registry, database, collector, secret store, DNS zone, and backup owner has Tim selected? +- What database isolation, migration, rollback, backup, restore, retention, and deletion contract is accepted? +- What rate-limit and spend budget protects Anthropic usage, and at which enforcement layer can principal/IP identity be trusted? +- What representative streamed interaction sets CPU/memory and idle-timeout evidence, and what reconnect behavior is required when an intermediary closes a quiet stream? +- How does a rolling singleton deployment avoid simultaneous ownership or unacceptable downtime, and what would justify a second replica? +- Which OTel bootstrap and resource attributes match HASH production, and which failures/usage signals must alert before the URL widens? +- What data classification applies to expert interviews, provider transmission, database rows, backups, logs, and traces? + +## Stop or reorient + +- Stop if public DNS or unrestricted ingress is created before the identity, authorization, rate-limit, telemetry, persistence, and recovery gates are accepted and observed. +- Stop if a green Docker build is represented as a deployed or durable product path without running the real streamed conversation through the image and selected infrastructure. +- Stop if task replacement loses or forks conversation/workpiece state, accepted work, owner binding, or any capture state the deployed path claims to preserve. +- Stop if rolling deployment or horizontal scaling can give one conversation two live owners without a proven routing/lease contract. +- Stop if the frontend integration replaces the stock assistant, merges histories, or depends on Brunch being available when stock mode is selected. +- Stop if the public root or mounted Flue route permits unauthenticated billable turns, cross-owner reads/writes, or bypass of the intended gateway. +- Stop if CORS, UUID entropy, ALB obscurity, or rate limiting is presented as authentication. +- Stop if telemetry variables are configured but no exported failure/turn/tool span reaches the approved backend, or if observability exports prompt/tool content without accepted policy. +- Stop if `DATABASE_URL` or another Postgres secret is provisioned but current SQLite/JSON code still ignores it while release claims Postgres durability. +- Stop if backup is claimed without naming the backed-up state and demonstrating a restore expectation, or if schema mismatch silently proceeds. +- Stop if container slimming drops external runtime dependencies, the core prompt, skill resources, client assets, or architecture support. +- Stop if arbitrary CPU, memory, timeout, replica, retention, or rate-limit numbers harden into infrastructure without a measured or owner-accepted premise. +- Reorient to a restricted singleton smoke if public-release prerequisites cannot be settled in the mission window; preserve the real image and operational evidence without weakening the public gate. + # Parallel and asynchronous proof tracks These tracks can begin before the numbered mission that may consume them. Product-changing tracks still need their own issue, branch, and mission when implementation begins. Results are evidence inputs; they do not silently rewrite another branch's authority. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/README.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/README.md index e3c0352a68e..507daaf7aaf 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/README.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/README.md @@ -16,8 +16,8 @@ Brunch is the stateful elicitation harness and package family at `libs/@hashinte subpath ships the harness repertoire, rendered by bindings and never imported by plugins. - [`packages/binding-flue/`](./packages/binding-flue/) is the Flue binding. - [`packages/transport-aisdk/`](./packages/transport-aisdk/) is the AI SDK transport. -- [`packages/plugin-gherkin/`](./packages/plugin-gherkin/) and - [`packages/plugin-sdcpn/`](./packages/plugin-sdcpn/) are the target plugins. +- [`packages/plugin-gherkin/`](./packages/plugin-gherkin/) pairs the software-behavior domain typology with the Gherkin target formalism. +- [`packages/plugin-sdcpn/`](./packages/plugin-sdcpn/) pairs the operational-process domain typology with the SDCPN target formalism. - [`../../../apps/brunch-agent/`](../../../apps/brunch-agent/) is the server and diagnostics app. HASH's repository root owns package discovery, dependency policy, the lockfile, and the Turbo task diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/adr/0006-plugins-per-target-formalism.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/adr/0006-plugins-per-target-formalism.md index 6c4c5287fbf..fc8ef828063 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/adr/0006-plugins-per-target-formalism.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/adr/0006-plugins-per-target-formalism.md @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ # ADR-0006: Plugins are per target formalism, authored as sectioned Markdown Date: 2026-08-25 -Status: accepted +Status: accepted; superseded in part by Mission 4 on 2026-09-01. The historical decision that a plugin unit is the target formalism alone is replaced by one reusable domain-typology / target-formalism pairing. The prohibition survives for concrete domains, situations, and scenarios. Amended by: [ADR-0007](0007-harness-teaching-meets-plugin-content-at-fixed-keys.md) (2026-08-25), decisions 2 and 5 — the machine-read tables become schema-validated data, the prose becomes cells under harness-owned keys, and the harness-generic lift is designed there diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/adr/0007-harness-teaching-meets-plugin-content-at-fixed-keys.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/adr/0007-harness-teaching-meets-plugin-content-at-fixed-keys.md index 71075048838..22b31786364 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/adr/0007-harness-teaching-meets-plugin-content-at-fixed-keys.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/adr/0007-harness-teaching-meets-plugin-content-at-fixed-keys.md @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ a harness package, never in app `skills/` directories), [ADR-0003](0003-three-re (three registers), [ADR-0005](0005-model-assisted-sdcpn-realization.md) (`project` / `validate` as code), IR Layer B's rule that interview ordering is derived from completion rather than taught, and completion rule 15 (whether a session may stop is session control, never guidance) +Corrected by Mission 4 on 2026-09-01: references below to a plugin naming “no domain” mean no concrete domain, organization, situation, or scenario. A plugin now explicitly pairs a reusable domain typology with its target formalism; its cells may use that typology. Decided on: the `ln/fe-1406-harness-teaching-adr` branch, from the [lineage audit](../evidence/audits/harness-teaching-lineage-audit.md) and the [penciled directions of 2026-08-14](../archive/planning-inputs/penciled-directions-2026-08-14.md); @@ -20,7 +21,7 @@ owning issue FE-1406 (gist: what the harness teaches) ## Context Kernel spec §11.5 has said since 2026-08-11 that **guidance ownership follows vocabulary -ownership**: a plugin teaches what to notice in its formalism; the harness teaches how to work an +ownership**: a plugin teaches what to notice through its domain typology and for its target formalism; the harness teaches how to work an interview situation the shared envelope can name. The rule was reaffirmed by FE-1397, ADR-0002, FE-1406, and ADR-0006's supersession map, and it has never been designed. The [audit](../evidence/audits/harness-teaching-lineage-audit.md) finds fifteen restatements, @@ -63,7 +64,7 @@ regex over prose and the completion anchor found by naming convention — the si 1. **One principle for every key: the harness defines and teaches the concept; the plugin specialises it in the harness's terms.** Plugin authoring is a fixed set of **keys**. The harness owns every key, its meaning, and its default text; a plugin fills cells under those keys - with content that names its kinds and never a domain. Rendering interleaves, key by key: the + with content that names its domain typology and kinds and never a concrete domain. Rendering interleaves, key by key: the key, the harness default, then the plugin's cell if it is not blank. Cells add; they never override a default — a default a plugin needs to contradict is a finding about the harness. Once the catalogue is frozen (decision 9), adding a key is an amendment to this record and the diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/specs/elicitation-kernel.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/specs/elicitation-kernel.md index 1606903c313..ecef1859624 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/specs/elicitation-kernel.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/specs/elicitation-kernel.md @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ Contradiction adjudications are collected in [Appendix A](#appendix-a--adjudicat Amended 2026-08-24 by [ADR-0005](../adr/0005-model-assisted-sdcpn-realization.md): code-bearing projections emit deterministic scaffolds and obligations; executable realization is downstream agent work. +Corrected by Mission 4 on 2026-09-01: the plugin unit now pairs a reusable domain typology with a target formalism; “never a domain” below continues to prohibit concrete domains, situations, and scenarios. ### Supersession map (2026-08-25) @@ -21,7 +22,7 @@ carries the operating truth, this map names it; the section itself is not rewrit | §5 envelope, §8 sweep and supersession, §11.1 "own payload structure" | [ADR-0003](../adr/0003-three-register-ir.md): captures are register 1; the elicited model is register 2, derived by a pure fold and never stored; projections are register 3. Envelope semantics unchanged. | | §6.1 `project` for code-bearing targets; §14.1 invariants 3 and 8 | [ADR-0005](../adr/0005-model-assisted-sdcpn-realization.md): the pure projection emits a scaffold, a typed code-obligation sidecar, and the loss report; executable realization is downstream application work. | | §9.5 completion derived, never a gate | [`elicitation-completion.md`](elicitation-completion.md): the invariants of `evaluateCompletion(model, mustKnowRows)` over the plugin file's `Must know` table, under [ADR-0006](../adr/0006-plugins-per-target-formalism.md). | -| §11.1 ElicitationPack (kernel cards, completion contract, clarification hints); §11.2 pack form | [ADR-0006](../adr/0006-plugins-per-target-formalism.md) and [`plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml): a plugin is one sectioned Markdown file per target formalism with fixed headings (`Purpose · Kinds · Must know · Patterns · Moves · Deliverable`); cards became kind-indexed `Patterns`, the completion contract became the `Must know` table, clarification hints became `Moves` steps. Principle v2 still governs the prose sections. `project`/`validate` remain plugin code ([`plugin-contract.md`](plugin-contract.md)). | +| §11.1 ElicitationPack (kernel cards, completion contract, clarification hints); §11.2 pack form | [ADR-0006](../adr/0006-plugins-per-target-formalism.md), as corrected by Mission 4, and [`plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml): a plugin defines one reusable domain-typology / target-formalism pairing under fixed headings (`Purpose · Kinds · Must know · Patterns · Moves · Deliverable`); cards became kind-indexed `Patterns`, the completion contract became the `Must know` table, clarification hints became `Moves` steps. Principle v2 still governs the prose sections. `project`/`validate` remain plugin code ([`plugin-contract.md`](plugin-contract.md)). | | §11.5 generic strategy cards | Unchanged in principle (guidance ownership follows vocabulary ownership); still named, not designed (FE-1406). Any harness-generic guidance would take the same `Patterns`/`Moves` shape. | | §13 portfolio and hybrid order ("both packs authored before the pack interface freezes") | [ADR-0006](../adr/0006-plugins-per-target-formalism.md): the interface is the heading contract and the three table grammars; the SDCPN file is authored, the Gherkin file is not; sequencing is owned by [STEERING](../control/STEERING.md). §13.1–13.3 target content is unchanged. | @@ -36,8 +37,7 @@ A standalone architecture that generalizes brunch's elicitor into **agentic inte pluggable elicitation targets**: a harness library on the Pi-family substrate (Flue first), deployable local and remote, in which an agent conducts a free-flowing interview, emits structured question affordances as conversation enhancements, and captures evidence-anchored structured -meaning into a durable target-document through idempotent sweeps — for any target-domain a plugin -defines. +meaning into a durable target-document through idempotent sweeps — for any concrete domain under the reusable domain-typology / target-formalism pairing a plugin defines. The governing design principle (adopted from the challenges doc): @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ code. The system is fully decoupled from brunch's September MVP. ## 3. Vocabulary The canonical glossary is context [`CONTEXT.md`](../../CONTEXT.md) — shells (substrate / ui / harness -/ plugin / binding), sessions and durability (target-domain / target-document / session / capture +/ plugin / binding), sessions and durability (domain typology / domain / target formalism / target-document / session / capture store / re-entry briefing), and interaction terms (affordance / capture / sweep / settlement / interpretation render), now extended with the envelope vocabulary this spec relies on (capture envelope, evidence span, epistemic status, absence state, resolution record, supersession, pack, @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ transport fact to earn `explicit`; nothing else may claim it. invalid / unsupported / unmapped / low-confidence` plus factual attributes (origin, references, can-default). Issues close only explicitly; `conflicting` closes **only** via a resolution record (§8.5). Two producers, **namespaced to their producer** (harness envelope issues vs. - plugin issues under their plugin/target-domain namespace) — restating criteria-doc invariant 6: + plugin issues under their plugin namespace) — restating criteria-doc invariant 6: a target-originated requirement never silently becomes a semantic requirement. - An **advisory** is a **computed, ephemeral fact** — surfaced to the agent at trigger or read time, never stored in the capture store, never blocking (adjudicated, L6). Named advisories: @@ -410,7 +410,7 @@ re-entry briefing, §9.3) and the agent judges whether to sweep before proceedin ### 9.1 Durable target-document, transient sessions, sweep as the only bridge -- **Target-document** = one target-domain + its capture store + its session history. Its +- **Target-document** = one concrete domain under one plugin's domain-typology / target-formalism pairing, plus its capture store and session history. Its authoritative state is **the capture store plus all session logs — never the render**. Projections, renders, and artifacts are strictly derived: cacheable, disposable. Session logs are durable truth too: discarding swept logs would dead-end every capture's evidence pointers. @@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ from "accept this"; agenda as derived state, never stored. Some interviewing technique is target-independent. Socratic pressure on premises, contrastive cases that separate competing interpretations, stress-testing the weak points of an argument — these operate on vocabulary the **harness** owns (conflicts, alternatives, ambiguity, weak or -missing evidence, absence clusters), not on any plugin's domain. By the same rule that governs +missing evidence, absence clusters), not on any plugin's domain typology. By the same rule that governs schemas ("the shell that defines a capability owns its affordance schemas", §4), **guidance ownership follows vocabulary ownership**: cards that teach _what to notice in a domain_ are plugin pack content; cards that teach _how to work an interview situation the envelope can name_ @@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ cases where plausible interpretations diverge and have the person classify them, asking abstract questions), plus brunch's `elicitation_style: interrogate | disambiguate | propose` trichotomy, which the exchange-schema audit already classed generic. The assurance target is the worked example of the split: its technique decomposes into a generic -stress-the-argument strategy card plus the plugin's domain cards (§13.2). +stress-the-argument strategy card plus the plugin's domain-typology cards (§13.2). ## 12. Shipping shape @@ -791,7 +791,7 @@ Milestone-one contract (one record type): 4. **Corrections don't erase history.** Superseded captures remain inspectable and never active. 5. **Retries are semantically idempotent.** A retried operation or re-swept range never creates a second user assertion (content-keyed capture identity). -6. **Issues are namespaced to their producer.** A plugin/target-domain requirement never silently +6. **Issues are namespaced to their producer.** A plugin-profile requirement never silently becomes a harness-level requirement; harness envelope issues are namespaced to the harness. 7. **Plugin failures are atomic.** A failed operation leaves no partially applied deltas; sweeps apply whole or refuse whole. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/specs/plugin-contract.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/specs/plugin-contract.md index 2df77b1d097..4f3673e788c 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/specs/plugin-contract.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/specs/plugin-contract.md @@ -1,32 +1,12 @@ -# Spec: the plugin contract — one definition per target formalism - -Status: **provisional**, reshaped 2026-08-25 by -[ADR-0006](../adr/0006-plugins-per-target-formalism.md) (a plugin is per formalism, never per -domain) and amended the same day by -[ADR-0007](../adr/0007-harness-teaching-meets-plugin-content-at-fixed-keys.md) (a plugin is data -under harness-owned keys). Ratification condition (inherited from -[ADR-0003](../adr/0003-three-register-ir.md)): a worked pass across at least three plugin -targets on a real fold. Decided on: FE-1405 (registers), FE-1480 (ADR-0005 outputs), FE-1431 -(the key contract), and the 2026-08-25 design-convergence review. The normative exemplars are -[`plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml) and -[`plugin-gherkin/plugin.yaml`](../../packages/plugin-gherkin/plugin.yaml), co-authored against the -same schema; where this document and the schema -([`packages/core/schema/plugin.schema.json`](../../packages/core/schema/plugin.schema.json), -derived from `PluginDefinitionSchema`) disagree about shape, the schema wins and this document is -amended. The retired declarative draft is archived at -[`plugin-contract-2026-08-25-declarative-draft.md`](../archive/specs/plugin-contract-2026-08-25-declarative-draft.md). +# Spec: the plugin contract — one definition per domain-typology / target-formalism pairing + +Status: **provisional**, reshaped 2026-08-25 by [ADR-0006](../adr/0006-plugins-per-target-formalism.md), amended by [ADR-0007](../adr/0007-harness-teaching-meets-plugin-content-at-fixed-keys.md), and corrected by Mission 4 on 2026-09-01: a plugin pairs a reusable domain typology with a target formalism and is never keyed to a concrete domain, situation, or scenario. Ratification condition (inherited from [ADR-0003](../adr/0003-three-register-ir.md)): a worked pass across at least three plugin pairings on a real fold. Decided on: FE-1405 (registers), FE-1480 (ADR-0005 outputs), FE-1431 (the key contract), and the 2026-08-25 design-convergence review. The normative exemplars are [`plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml) and [`plugin-gherkin/plugin.yaml`](../../packages/plugin-gherkin/plugin.yaml), co-authored against the same schema; where this document and the schema ([`packages/core/schema/plugin.schema.json`](../../packages/core/schema/plugin.schema.json), derived from `PluginDefinitionSchema`) disagree about shape, the schema wins and this document is amended. The retired declarative draft is archived at [`plugin-contract-2026-08-25-declarative-draft.md`](../archive/specs/plugin-contract-2026-08-25-declarative-draft.md). ## What a plugin is -A plugin is **per target formalism** — Gherkin, SDCPN — never per domain. It is one authored -`plugin.yaml` whose keys are fixed by the harness, plus a small amount of code for `project` and -`validate`. The harness reads the contract keys into the model vocabulary, the demand list, and -the pattern index; it renders every other key into the interviewer's instructions interleaved -with its own teaching — for each key, the harness's definition of the key, then the repertoire's -default, then the plugin's cell. The end user never edits the file. +A plugin defines one reusable **domain typology / target formalism pairing** — for example, software behavior / Gherkin or operational processes / SDCPN — never one concrete domain. It is one authored `plugin.yaml` whose keys are fixed by the harness, plus a small amount of code for `project` and `validate`. The harness reads the contract keys into the model vocabulary, demand list, and pattern index; it renders every other key into the interviewer's instructions interleaved with its own teaching — for each key, the harness's definition of the key, then the repertoire's default, then the plugin's cell. The end user never edits the file. -The keys fall in four groups (ADR-0007 decision 2), under an identity block `plugin` (`id`, -`version`, `formalism`, `jobs`, `purpose`): +The keys fall in four groups (ADR-0007 decision 2), under an identity block `plugin` (`id`, `version`, `domain_typology`, `formalism`, `jobs`, `purpose`): | group | keys | who fills it | | ----------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------- | @@ -49,9 +29,7 @@ precision words. Such an item is rendered only when at least one plugin demand n word. This conditions generic teaching on the plugin contract without allowing a plugin to override the repertoire. -Domain-neutrality rule: nothing in the definition may name a domain. A new case that seems to -need a new row is a finding about the abstraction, decided by review, never content added to a -plugin. +Concrete-domain-neutrality rule: a definition may name and teach its reusable domain typology, but it may not name a particular organization, operation, situation, or scenario. A new concrete case that seems to need a new row is a finding about the abstraction, decided by review, never case content added to a plugin. ## Relation to the three registers @@ -95,8 +73,7 @@ Rules the reader enforces beyond the schema: ## Version binding -The identity block declares an immutable version string (`sdcpn/2026-08-25.2`, -`gherkin/2026-08-25.1`). Every completion evaluation, projection output, and delivered report +The identity block declares an immutable version string (currently `sdcpn/2026-09-01.1` and `gherkin/2026-09-01.1`). Every completion evaluation, projection output, and delivered report carries that version together with the target-document revision it read. A report for one plugin version is not comparable with a model folded under another; the caller retries rather than mixing them. The repertoire carries its own version (`repertoire/…`). @@ -146,10 +123,9 @@ IR slot, fourth register, or plugin operation. `reconcile` remains optional. The primary seam is still the fold: `fold(definition, activeCaptures) → model`, golden-tested with hand-worked capture sets in and slot states out. Gates: the **definition read gate** (schema match with no unknown key; every `must_know` kind exists; the anchor is a counted row; runbooks -belong to declared jobs), the **shipped-definition gate** (both plugins load, add no key, name no -domain, and declare different anchors under the same schema), the **schema drift gate** +belong to declared jobs), the **shipped-definition gate** (both plugins load, declare their domain typology, add no key, name no concrete domain, and declare different anchors under the same schema), the **schema drift gate** (`plugin.schema.json` equals the emitted view of the valibot schema), the **repertoire gate** -(every key filled, every entry sourced, no formalism or domain word), the **render-order gate** +(every key filled, every entry sourced, no domain-typology, formalism, or concrete-domain content), the **render-order gate** (preamble → contract → guidance keys in catalogue order → runbooks per declared job; definition before default before cell), and the **completion fixtures** of `evaluateCompletion` described in [`elicitation-completion.md`](elicitation-completion.md). Test-fit order stands: smallest honest diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/specs/structurally-typed-elicitation-runbooks.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/specs/structurally-typed-elicitation-runbooks.md index 3f2281b8fc6..b916beaf271 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/specs/structurally-typed-elicitation-runbooks.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/specs/structurally-typed-elicitation-runbooks.md @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ Status: **accepted design input for Mission 3**. Live execution authority remain the first architecture to test; it is not evidence that the design works. Reorient the mission if the real Flue path contradicts it. +Amended 2026-09-01 by Mission 4's accepted plugin-scope correction: each plugin profile couples a reusable domain typology with a target formalism while remaining independent of any concrete domain, situation, or scenario. Formalism-only language below is corrected accordingly. + Unless explicitly identified as the existing typed three-register IR, **IR** below means the **runbook IR**: Mission 3's structurally typed Markdown workpiece. @@ -19,10 +21,7 @@ The following decisions were reached before implementation. Markdown hierarchy and repeated entry shapes may be strict while their contents remain prose. Mission 3 does not require captures, IR fields, or runbook entries to participate in a closed semantic type system. -3. **The reusable split is universal repertoire versus target-formalism runbook.** Universal - teaching explains generally useful elicitation judgment. A target-formalism runbook says what - that judgment should attend to, pursue, preserve, transform, and check for SDCPN modelling. It - is not keyed to a concrete situation such as a truck fleet or semiconductor fab. +3. **The reusable split is universal repertoire versus plugin profile.** Universal teaching explains generally useful elicitation judgment. A plugin profile couples a reusable domain typology with a target formalism and says what that judgment should recognize, pursue, preserve, transform, and check for the pairing. It is not keyed to a concrete situation such as a particular truck fleet or semiconductor fab. 4. **The two authored layers may merge into one model-facing projection.** Mission 3 will author that first projection directly. It will not build a compiler or revive the old plugin renderer before a second real consumer creates strain. @@ -60,7 +59,7 @@ Rejected first shapes: Deferred decisions: - the final heading catalogue and exact resource boundaries; -- whether repeated use earns an automated repertoire + target-formalism projection; +- whether repeated use earns automated composition of the repertoire and plugin profile; - which, if any, runbook or IR concepts later become semantically typed; - whether later lifecycle phases warrant distinct skills or agents under observed strain; - canvas mutation and programmatic PN loading; @@ -105,10 +104,10 @@ The harness repertoire and its research sources already establish useful general Primary local syntheses include [`elicitation-strategy-literature.md`](../research/elicitation/elicitation-strategy-literature.md), [`frontier-model-elicitor-failure-catalogue.md`](../research/elicitation/frontier-model-elicitor-failure-catalogue.md), -and the current [`repertoire.yaml`](../../packages/core/src/repertoire.yaml). Their content is +and the current [`repertoire.yaml`](../../packages/core/src/teaching/repertoire.yaml). Their content is source material; Mission 3 does not restore the repertoire runtime. -### Target-formalism teaching +### Plugin teaching: domain typology and target formalism The SDCPN material already identifies reusable typologies of modelling situations rather than concrete scenario facts: @@ -121,13 +120,12 @@ concrete scenario facts: - shared-resource contention and practiced policies; - discrete events, continuous dynamics, mode changes, thresholds, and probabilistic outcomes; - recurring PN construction patterns for timed work, branching, and related structures; -- formalism-specific caveats, failure modes, losses, and validity checks. +- domain-typology- and formalism-specific caveats, failure modes, losses, and validity checks. The current [`plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml), its archived CPS guidance and replays, and the independently written process-to-PN notes converge on this shape. The archived guidance also records the important correction that its former `domain` tag was a -mis-tag: the useful cards describe model-situation types that lift to the target-formalism level -without naming an operational domain. +mis-tag: the useful cards describe model-situation types that belong to the plugin's reusable domain typology without naming a concrete operational domain. ### External resonance @@ -148,16 +146,16 @@ organization, not evidence that models secretly parse a fixed heading schema. | Term | Definition | | --- | --- | -| **Universal repertoire** | Generally applicable elicitation concepts, directives, procedures, judgment activations, caveats, and failure knowledge. It teaches *how to elicit* without naming a target formalism or concrete scenario. | -| **Target-formalism runbook** | Human-readable guidance for eliciting and constructing one artifact family, initially SDCPN: what to investigate, notice, deepen, preserve, transform, and check. | -| **Rendered runbook** | The model-facing combination of universal repertoire and target-formalism content, organized by a known Markdown hierarchy. In Mission 3 it is authored directly rather than compiled. | +| **Universal repertoire** | Generally applicable elicitation concepts, directives, procedures, judgment activations, caveats, and failure knowledge. It teaches *how to elicit* without naming a domain typology, target formalism, or concrete scenario. | +| **Plugin profile** | Human-readable guidance coupling one reusable domain typology with one target formalism, initially operational processes / SDCPN: what to investigate, notice, deepen, preserve, transform, and check. | +| **Rendered runbook** | The model-facing combination of universal repertoire and plugin-profile content, organized by a known Markdown hierarchy. In Mission 3 it is authored directly rather than compiled. | | **Runbook skill** | The one Flue skill package that delivers the rendered runbook, lifecycle procedure, IR template, construction guidance, and checks through progressive disclosure. | | **Legacy YAML runbook cells** | The existing schema field named `runbooks`, containing `kickoff`, `trajectory`, and `close` cells per job. It keeps its code-level name but represents only the lifecycle region of the broader runbook concept. | | **Structural typing** | Required heading families, nesting, repeated entry shapes, and completion fields whose contents may remain prose. Structure determines where meaning belongs without closing its semantic vocabulary. | | **Semantic typing** | Closed kinds, slots, values, proposal types, grades, firing predicates, or fold rules that require content to be classified into a formal semantic system. Deferred in Mission 3. | | **Runbook IR** | The structurally typed Markdown workpiece filled from the conversation and consumed by PN generation. It can represent unknowns, assumptions, caveats, and unresolved questions without typed capture claims. It is an experiment in an intermediate representation, distinct from the existing typed three-register **IR**. | | **Lifecycle phase** | A mode of work performed by the same agent: orient, elicit, maintain/review the IR, construct the PN, and check/deliver. A phase selects relevant runbook material; it is not a separate agent. | -| **Situation typology** | A recurring model-relevant shape—timed work, probabilistic outcome, contended resource, threshold trigger—applicable across concrete operational domains. | +| **Situation typology** | One recurring model-relevant shape within a plugin's domain typology—timed work, probabilistic outcome, contended resource, threshold trigger—applicable across concrete domains. | ## Architecture @@ -173,13 +171,13 @@ that return path without inventing a state machine. ### Two authored knowledge layers -The universal repertoire and target-formalism runbook remain conceptually separate because their +The universal repertoire and plugin profile remain conceptually separate because their ownership and reuse differ: ```text universal repertoire: how elicitation goes well + -target-formalism runbook: what SDCPN elicitation and construction require +plugin profile: what the operational-process typology and SDCPN formalism require = rendered runbook: what this agent reads ``` @@ -291,7 +289,7 @@ What to investigate ├─ policies, exceptions, and practiced rules └─ validation criteria -Target-formalism guidance +Plugin guidance ├─ lenses and heuristics ├─ situation typologies and patterns ├─ caveats and rabbit holes @@ -425,7 +423,7 @@ over the real Flue path to produce a validatable PN. It does not establish: - Activation yields the lifecycle procedure. - Supporting resources are listed and readable through Flue's native resource affordance. - Each required runbook responsibility and IR section has one authoritative home. -- Universal and target-formalism material are distinguishable by content and provenance even where +- Universal and plugin-profile material are distinguishable by content and provenance even where rendered together. ### Behavioral checks @@ -446,7 +444,7 @@ The runbook is improved empirically: 1. run a fixed elicitation situation through the headless path; 2. inspect the conversation, resource reads, filled IR, PN, and checks; -3. classify the miss as universal teaching, target-formalism guidance, IR structure, construction +3. classify the miss as universal teaching, plugin-profile guidance, IR structure, construction guidance, or tool/runtime behavior; 4. edit the single owning location; 5. rerun without adding semantic machinery unless the miss requires it. @@ -463,7 +461,7 @@ Mission 3's runbook design is successfully exercised when: 3. The skill progressively exposes lifecycle procedure, elicitation teaching, IR template, PN construction guidance, and checks using Flue's native skill/resource surfaces. 4. The runbook has the structural responsibilities defined above and incorporates both universal - elicitation teaching and SDCPN target-formalism content. + elicitation teaching and operational-process/SDCPN plugin-profile content. 5. A headless conversation yields a recoverable, structured-but-not-strictly-semantically-typed IR. 6. The same agent can use that IR and disclosed construction guidance to produce PN JSON. 7. Petrinaut accepts the output at the parser/validation boundary selected by the mission. @@ -477,7 +475,7 @@ Mission 3's runbook design is successfully exercised when: - One runbook skill; no speculative skill catalog. - Flue's system instruction, skill activation, supporting-resource, and tool happy paths. - Direct Markdown authoring before automated projection. -- Target-formalism content, not concrete scenario content. +- Reusable domain-typology and target-formalism content, not concrete scenario content. - Expert vocabulary during elicitation; PN vocabulary during construction. - Structurally typed IR; no requirement for typed capture claims. - No join to Mission 2's capture store. @@ -496,7 +494,7 @@ Mission 3's runbook design is successfully exercised when: | Flue supporting resources provide sufficient phase disclosure. | high for mechanism, medium for behavior | One package with lazy reference. | Observe `read_skill_resource` use and phase relevance. | | Separating construction reference reduces schema-shaped interviewing. | medium | Elicitation/construction resource boundary. | Compare interview questions with resource reads and PN vocabulary leakage. | | A structured prose IR contains enough information for inferred PN generation. | low-to-medium | Deferral of strict semantic typing. | Generate and validate the Mission 3 PN. | -| Universal versus target-formalism ownership can be discovered through co-authoring. | medium | Direct merged authoring before a compiler. | Record entries that migrate after real use. | +| Universal versus plugin-profile ownership can be discovered through co-authoring. | medium | Direct merged authoring before a compiler. | Record entries that migrate after real use. | | One agent can loop between elicitation and construction coherently. | medium | Single-agent lifecycle. | Exercise at least one construction-discovered gap and return path if the fixed scenario exposes one. | ## Resolved questions @@ -505,7 +503,7 @@ Mission 3's runbook design is successfully exercised when: No. Those are lifecycle subheadings inside a broader agent definition. **Is the runbook universal or target-specific?** -The universal repertoire and target-formalism content have separate authorship semantics and may +The universal repertoire and plugin-profile content have separate authorship semantics and may merge in the rendered runbook. Concrete scenario facts belong in the IR instance. **Must the runbook revive the typed plugin contract?** diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/README.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/README.md index 50c2f3fd1fd..1fa2c3a8b71 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/README.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/README.md @@ -65,6 +65,8 @@ The resource names in `SKILL.md` are logical addresses in one assembled Flue ski If a rule must bind before a lazy resource might be read, it does not belong only in that resource. If material merely teaches how to carry out one phase, it does not earn always-on prompt space. +Resources read together must be additive: when the universal and plugin elicitation references state the same rule, core owns it and the plugin retains only the operational-process or target-formalism consequence. Resources read at different moments may project a universal invariant into a local recording or checking obligation. + ## Shared elicitation registers - **Directives** bind conduct within elicitation and revision. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md index 41c49c39aa8..2c7c8b5188f 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ These checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readines - Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged. - Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present. -If materially different nets remain possible because one consequential fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Ask the smallest resolving question only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry. +If materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry. ## During construction diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md index c828ee7ecdf..03f52743f82 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ The registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggest ### Build the operational account the purpose needs -Elicit or revise an account that can support the person's stated simulation question, comparison, or decision. Establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use. +For the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use. Every objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure. @@ -18,11 +18,7 @@ Ask about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures ### Preserve operational context -A value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter. - -### Separate evidence from precision - -A narrowly stated value is not necessarily well supported, and a well-supported account may remain broad. Preserve what the person or source supports separately from how narrow the value is. Do not force a distribution, rate, probability, or threshold below the granularity the operation can observe. +A value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter. ### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses @@ -41,7 +37,6 @@ Recognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automati - **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone. - **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context. - **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity. -- **A memorable failure** establishes a possible mechanism and consequence, not its probability. ### Operational situation patterns @@ -123,7 +118,7 @@ Across the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work ### Test practiced policy with a borderline case -When a document or general rule says what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case. Preserve prescribed and practiced accounts and the context selecting between them rather than averaging them. +When a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule. ### Close a resource account @@ -149,10 +144,6 @@ Ask whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; dive Ask what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests. -### Re-enter from construction narrowly - -When construction cannot choose among materially different structures without inventing an operational fact, name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only in an interactive conversation; otherwise deposit it as a re-entry question. - ## Coverage Coverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories. @@ -205,7 +196,6 @@ Apply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction a - At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms. - Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported. - A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff. -- Questions follow the person's active thread rather than the Coverage headings. ### Operational semantics @@ -217,8 +207,7 @@ Apply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction a ### Quantities and context -- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold preserves the context and precision the evidence supports. -- One memorable incident has not silently become a frequency. +- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it. - A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named. - Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value. @@ -229,6 +218,5 @@ Apply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction a - **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage. - **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation. - **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context. -- **False quantitative confidence:** a vivid incident becomes a probability or an unknown spread becomes a conventional distribution. Restore the supported form. - **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies. - **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md index 1dc16c61ea1..b23cd37e76b 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md @@ -27,12 +27,12 @@ five-register-synthesis/ ├── SOURCE-MAP.md ├── core/ │ ├── SYSTEM.md -│ ├── flue.ts +│ ├── flue.ts.example │ └── universal-elicitation.md └── plugin-sdcpn/ ├── APPEND_SYSTEM.md └── sdcpn-modelling/ - ├── skill.ts + ├── skill.ts.example ├── instructions.md ├── profile.md ├── workpiece-template.md @@ -47,10 +47,10 @@ five-register-synthesis/ ### Responsibilities - [`core/SYSTEM.md`](core/SYSTEM.md) contains the context- and target-independent role and invariants needed from the first turn. -- [`core/universal-elicitation.md`](core/universal-elicitation.md) contains progressive universal strategies and methods under the five registers; [`core/flue.ts`](core/flue.ts) exports its raw text through the existing core Flue subpath for explicit composition. +- [`core/universal-elicitation.md`](core/universal-elicitation.md) contains progressive universal strategies and methods under the five registers; [`core/flue.ts.example`](core/flue.ts.example) shows how its raw text would be exported through the existing core Flue subpath for explicit composition. - [`plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md`](plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md) selects operational-process/SDCPN modelling, requires skill activation, states workpiece-first construction, and protects the elicitation/construction boundary. - [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md) describes the conceptual lifecycle, distinguishes the currently available interactive and construct-only runtime branches, and routes to packaged resource names. -- [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts) uses Flue's native `defineSkill` to compose the instructions, core-owned universal reference, and plugin-owned resources into one skill. Flue synthesizes the packaged `SKILL.md`. +- [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts.example`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts.example) shows Flue's native `defineSkill` composing the instructions, core-owned universal reference, and plugin-owned resources into one skill. Flue synthesizes the packaged `SKILL.md`. - [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md) is the unified additive plugin profile coupling operational-process domain typology and SDCPN consequences. - [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md) is the recoverable process-model artifact. - [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md) contains construction mappings and patterns disclosed only during construction. @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ They deliberately do not mirror headings. Evaluate whether the append adds a spe ### Activated modelling lifecycle -Read [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md), then inspect [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts). The instructions should make the lifecycle and packaged-resource pointers legible without embedding the reference content itself; the definition should contain composition only, not duplicate their prose. +Read [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md), then inspect [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts.example`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts.example). The instructions should make the lifecycle and packaged-resource pointers legible without embedding the reference content itself; the definition should contain composition only, not duplicate their prose. For elicitation or revision, follow its pointers to: diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md index 8128740039f..68cff27e1a1 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md @@ -8,10 +8,10 @@ This map accounts for the primary working and draft material used to produce the | --- | --- | --- | | `core/SYSTEM.md` | Compact always-on universal role and invariants | Active core `src/SYSTEM.md`; `_drafts/system-prompts/assemblies/*`; prompt audit and section workbench | | `core/universal-elicitation.md` | Progressive universal strategies and methods under five registers | Active SDCPN `elicitation.md` entries marked universal; core `repertoire.yaml`; current APPEND cues/probes/movements/licenses/guards that do not depend on SDCPN; predecessor `elicit/SKILL.md` | -| `core/flue.ts` | Raw-string export of the core-owned progressive reference through the existing core Flue subpath | Verified `?raw` library build and cross-package `defineSkill` composition spike | +| `core/flue.ts.example` | Raw-string export of the core-owned progressive reference through the existing core Flue subpath | Verified `?raw` library build and cross-package `defineSkill` composition spike | | `plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md` | Concise operational-process/SDCPN specialization and router | Active plugin `flue.ts` inline instruction; active APPEND role; current skill lifecycle and construction boundary | | `sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md` | Conceptual lifecycle, runtime branches, and packaged-resource routing | Active `sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md`; accepted Mission 3 information hierarchy; predecessor elicitation procedure | -| `sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts` | Explicit composition of separately authored resources into one Flue skill | Installed Flue `defineSkill` contract; verified core-package → plugin-package → production Flue-app spike | +| `sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts.example` | Explicit composition of separately authored resources into one Flue skill | Installed Flue `defineSkill` contract; verified core-package → plugin-package → production Flue-app spike | | `sdcpn-modelling/profile.md` | Unified operational-process domain typology and SDCPN profile under five registers | Active APPEND target material; active `elicitation.md` SDCPN/mixed material; Ciaran outline; current plugin YAML concepts | | `workpiece-template.md` | Provisional domain-primary recoverable process-model workpiece | Active `ir-template.md`; Mission 4 proof obligations; Ciaran investigation headings | | `coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md` | Workpiece paired with the formalism-primary Coverage alternative for a fair comparison | Active `ir-template.md`; formalism-primary Coverage candidate; Mission 4 proof obligations | @@ -61,11 +61,11 @@ Source: `packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md`. Sources: `packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/`. -### `SKILL.md` → `instructions.md` plus `skill.ts` +### `SKILL.md` → `instructions.md` plus `skill.ts.example` The active skill's conceptual lifecycle, `runbook-ir` full-document emission convention, partial delivery, and phase resource routing move to plain `instructions.md`. The candidate requires a final full workpiece emission before construction handoff and workpiece-only delivery. It also distinguishes the current interactive and construct-only runtime branches: construct-only execution reports a re-entry question instead of interviewing. Existing-model revision applies fully to the workpiece and only to net changes supported by mounted mutation capabilities. -The plugin-owned `skill.ts` uses Flue's native `defineSkill` to map the instructions, core-owned universal reference, and plugin-owned profile/template/construction/check resources into one packaged skill. Flue synthesizes the packaged `SKILL.md`; no authored duplicate remains. +The plugin-owned `skill.ts.example` demonstrates Flue's native `defineSkill` to map the instructions, core-owned universal reference, and plugin-owned profile/template/construction/check resources into one packaged skill. Flue synthesizes the packaged `SKILL.md`; no authored duplicate remains. ### `elicitation.md` diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/core/flue.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/core/flue.ts.example similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/core/flue.ts rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/core/flue.ts.example diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts.example similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts.example diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/schema/CHANGELOG.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/schema/CHANGELOG.md index 3a18e0e8cf4..a9bc482a7c3 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/schema/CHANGELOG.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/schema/CHANGELOG.md @@ -6,6 +6,16 @@ or left alone, and why, with the evidence that moved it. `plugin.schema.json` is derived from `PluginDefinitionSchema` in `src/plugin/plugin-definition.ts`; a test fails when the two drift. +## Cycle 3 — 2026-09-01 + +Corrected the plugin identity after the Mission 4 prompt/runbook synthesis exposed that the previous formalism-only description had discarded an authored layer. + +- Added required `plugin.domain_typology` alongside `plugin.formalism`. +- A plugin now names one reusable domain typology / target formalism pairing. `plugin-sdcpn` pairs operational processes with SDCPN; `plugin-gherkin` pairs software behavior with Gherkin. +- Preserved the concrete-domain boundary: no plugin definition may name a particular operation, organization, situation, or scenario. +- Bumped both shipped definition versions to `2026-09-01.1` because their identity contract changed. +- Added no guidance key, semantic claim type, or runtime composition mechanism. + ## Cycle 1 — 2026-08-25 First materialisation. Both test-case plugins (`plugin-sdcpn`, `plugin-gherkin`) diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/schema/plugin.schema.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/schema/plugin.schema.json index eb09fcc881d..940f77a5674 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/schema/plugin.schema.json +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/schema/plugin.schema.json @@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ "type": "string", "pattern": "^[a-z][a-z0-9-]*\\/\\d{4}-\\d{2}-\\d{2}\\.\\d+$" }, + "domain_typology": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + }, "formalism": { "type": "string", "minLength": 1 @@ -32,7 +36,14 @@ "minLength": 1 } }, - "required": ["id", "version", "formalism", "jobs", "purpose"], + "required": [ + "id", + "version", + "domain_typology", + "formalism", + "jobs", + "purpose" + ], "additionalProperties": false }, "ontology": { diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin/plugin-definition.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin/plugin-definition.ts index e1a8b8ec3e8..69adc1bbb56 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin/plugin-definition.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin/plugin-definition.ts @@ -3,7 +3,8 @@ * (ADR-0007 decision 8). * * A plugin is data under fixed keys in four groups — contract (`ontology`, - * `schema`, `patterns`), guidance, runbooks, machinery — plus an identity block. + * `schema`, `patterns`), guidance, runbooks, machinery — plus an identity block + * naming its reusable domain typology and target formalism. * The schema here is the contract: an unknown key anywhere is rejected, so a * plugin can specialise every key and add none. The cross-checks below are the * facts a schema cannot state — that every row names a declared kind, that the @@ -148,6 +149,7 @@ export interface PluginDefinition { readonly version: string; readonly identity: { readonly id: string; + readonly domainTypology: string; readonly formalism: string; readonly jobs: readonly Job[]; readonly purpose: string; @@ -229,6 +231,7 @@ export const PluginDefinitionSchema = v.strictObject({ plugin: v.strictObject({ id: identifier, version, + domain_typology: text, formalism: text, jobs: v.pipe(v.array(v.picklist(JOBS)), v.minLength(1)), purpose: text, @@ -467,6 +470,7 @@ export function readPluginDefinition(yamlText: string): PluginDefinition { version: input.plugin.version, identity: { id: input.plugin.id, + domainTypology: input.plugin.domain_typology, formalism: input.plugin.formalism, jobs, purpose: input.plugin.purpose, diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin/plugin.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin/plugin.ts index 9575f404570..75c83cb12c0 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin/plugin.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin/plugin.ts @@ -11,8 +11,9 @@ import type { PluginDefinition } from "./plugin-definition"; * says the trivial target must not freeze the plugin contract before the hard * target has stressed it, so nothing in this scaffold ratifies the SDK export * surface. What the descriptor fixes now is only what the topology needs — - * that a plugin declares which target formalism it defines, and does so through - * Valibot like every other boundary in the system (spec §12.4). + * that a plugin declares the reusable domain typology it investigates and the + * target formalism it defines, and does so through Valibot like every other + * boundary in the system (spec §12.4). * * ADR-0007 adds the plugin definition: `plugin.yaml` under the harness-owned * keys, whose contract keys parameterise the harness's fold, completion, and @@ -25,7 +26,9 @@ export const PluginDescriptor = v.object({ v.string(), v.regex(/^plugin-[a-z][a-z0-9-]*$/, "expected a `plugin-` name"), ), - /** The target formalism this plugin elicits toward — gherkin, sdcpn — never a domain. */ + /** The reusable subject-matter typology this plugin investigates — never a concrete domain. */ + domainTypology: v.pipe(v.string(), v.nonEmpty()), + /** The artifact formalism this plugin elicits toward — gherkin, sdcpn. */ targetFormalism: v.pipe(v.string(), v.nonEmpty()), }); diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/prompts.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/prompts.ts index ab52ffe0d51..d899cce5e06 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/prompts.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/prompts.ts @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ import repertoireYaml from "./teaching/repertoire.yaml?raw"; * The harness's validated default teaching. * * The repertoire fills every guidance and runbook key before a plugin adds its - * formalism-specific cells. Every entry names its evidence source, and reading + * domain-typology- and target-formalism-specific cells. Every entry names its evidence source, and reading * fails at module load if a key is empty or unsourced. Bindings and evaluation * composition may import `@hashintel/brunch-agent/prompts`; plugins may not. * diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/teaching/repertoire.yaml b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/teaching/repertoire.yaml index 80752f740de..f1555863e46 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/teaching/repertoire.yaml +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/teaching/repertoire.yaml @@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ # interviewer is taught before any plugin says a word. Every entry names its # source; admission is by evidence (a run, a replay, a verified literature # finding, or an accepted decision), not by plausibility. Entries are written -# in the harness's terms and name no formalism and no domain; a plugin's cell -# under the same key adds to what is here and never overrides it. +# in the harness's terms and name no domain typology, target formalism, or concrete domain; a +# plugin's cell under the same key adds to what is here and never overrides it. # # Paths are relative to the Brunch context root. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/testing/index.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/testing/index.ts index c0526d58c0f..14a8a8f9e7f 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/testing/index.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/testing/index.ts @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ const fixtureProposalSchema = v.strictObject({ export function pluginFixture(overrides: Partial = {}): Plugin { return definePlugin({ name: "plugin-fixture", + domainTypology: "things and steps", targetFormalism: "fixture", proposalCatalog: [ { diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/plugin-definition.test.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/plugin-definition.test.ts index cc4bbbf77ed..682c7015f03 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/plugin-definition.test.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/plugin-definition.test.ts @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ describe("the synthetic fixture definition", () => { expect(definition.version).toBe("fixture/2026-08-25.1"); expect(definition.identity).toEqual({ id: "fixture", + domainTypology: "things and steps", formalism: "fixture", jobs: ["construct"], purpose: "Interview someone about things and steps.", @@ -129,6 +130,11 @@ describe("contract violations fail to load", () => { FIXTURE_PLUGIN_YAML.replace("fixture/2026-08-25.1", "fixture-1"), /yyyy-mm-dd/u, ], + [ + "a missing domain typology", + FIXTURE_PLUGIN_YAML.replace(" domain_typology: things and steps\n", ""), + /plugin\.domain_typology/u, + ], [ "a demand row for an unknown kind", FIXTURE_PLUGIN_YAML.replace( @@ -215,15 +221,19 @@ const readShipped = (packageName: string): PluginDefinition => ), ); -/** Words that would mean the plugin knows a domain rather than a formalism. */ -const DOMAIN_WORDS = +/** Words that would mean the plugin knows a concrete domain rather than a reusable domain typology. */ +const CONCRETE_DOMAIN_WORDS = /\b(hospital|patient|coating|vestera|truck|packaging|warehouse|factory|bakery|clinic)\b/iu; describe.skipIf(!contextRootPresent)("the shipped plugin definitions", () => { - test.each(["plugin-sdcpn", "plugin-gherkin"])( - "%s validates, adds no key, and names no domain", - (packageName) => { + test.each([ + ["plugin-sdcpn", "operational processes"], + ["plugin-gherkin", "software behavior"], + ])( + "%s validates, declares its domain typology, adds no key, and names no concrete domain", + (packageName, domainTypology) => { const definition = readShipped(packageName); + expect(definition.identity.domainTypology).toBe(domainTypology); expect(definition.identity.id).toBe(packageName.replace("plugin-", "")); expect(definition.kinds.length).toBeGreaterThan(0); expect( @@ -234,7 +244,7 @@ describe.skipIf(!contextRootPresent)("the shipped plugin definitions", () => { ), ).toBe(true); const text = JSON.stringify(definition); - expect(text).not.toMatch(DOMAIN_WORDS); + expect(text).not.toMatch(CONCRETE_DOMAIN_WORDS); for (const key of GUIDANCE_KEYS) { expect(definition.guidance).toHaveProperty(key); } diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/slot-fixtures.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/slot-fixtures.ts index 996cbb784e2..8f6243b2701 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/slot-fixtures.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/slot-fixtures.ts @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ import type { SlotAssertion } from "../src/plugin/slot-assertion"; export const FIXTURE_PLUGIN_YAML = `plugin: id: fixture version: fixture/2026-08-25.1 + domain_typology: things and steps formalism: fixture jobs: [construct] purpose: Interview someone about things and steps. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-gherkin/package.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-gherkin/package.json index 5fcb5411090..4f704ac1d69 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-gherkin/package.json +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-gherkin/package.json @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ "name": "@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-gherkin", "version": "0.0.0-private", "private": true, - "description": "The gherkin target: the tracer plugin, wired end-to-end first as the cheap mechanism proof.", + "description": "The software-behavior domain typology and Gherkin target formalism: the tracer plugin wired first as the cheap mechanism proof.", "license": "AGPL-3.0", "type": "module", "exports": { diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-gherkin/plugin.yaml b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-gherkin/plugin.yaml index 1cdabc2ac61..2bec9ddae29 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-gherkin/plugin.yaml +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-gherkin/plugin.yaml @@ -2,15 +2,16 @@ # # Keys are owned by the harness; see `packages/core/schema/plugin.schema.json` # and `docs/adr/0007-harness-teaching-meets-plugin-content-at-fixed-keys.md`. -# This is the tracer plugin: it exists to prove that a second formalism, with a -# different anchor and a different model shape, fits the same keys without -# the keys bending toward process modelling. Cells are filled only where the -# formalism has something to say; a blank cell means the harness default is +# This is the tracer plugin: it exists to prove that a second domain-typology/ +# formalism pairing, with a different anchor and model shape, fits the same keys +# without the keys bending toward process modelling. Cells are filled only where +# the formalism has something to say; a blank cell means the harness default is # the whole of the guidance. plugin: id: gherkin - version: gherkin/2026-08-26.2 + version: gherkin/2026-09-01.1 + domain_typology: software behavior formalism: Gherkin — executable specifications as features, rules, and examples jobs: [construct, review-and-revise] purpose: | diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-gherkin/src/index.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-gherkin/src/index.ts index 42b231ac254..f7c5f3bec5f 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-gherkin/src/index.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-gherkin/src/index.ts @@ -1,10 +1,12 @@ /** - * `@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-gherkin` — the gherkin target formalism (spec §13.1). + * `@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-gherkin` — the software-behavior domain + * typology paired with the Gherkin target formalism. * * The tracer target: cheap enough to wire end-to-end first, and deliberately * different in shape from the process-model plugin, so that the plugin - * contract is co-authored against two formalisms and freezes toward neither - * (spec §13's two-targets-on-each-axis rule; ADR-0007 decision 9). Its + * contract is co-authored against two domain-typology/formalism pairings and + * freezes toward neither + * (spec §13's two-targets rule; ADR-0007 decision 9). Its * definition is `plugin.yaml` — a feature-anchored tree of rules, examples, * and steps under the same harness-owned keys as every plugin. Its proposal * stays at the verbatim floor in this cycle; `project` and `validate` land @@ -55,6 +57,7 @@ export const gherkinDefinition = readPluginDefinition(pluginYaml); export const gherkin = definePlugin({ name: "plugin-gherkin", + domainTypology: gherkinDefinition.identity.domainTypology, targetFormalism: "gherkin", definition: gherkinDefinition, proposalCatalog: [ diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-gherkin/test/statement-noted.test.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-gherkin/test/statement-noted.test.ts index c1223cca7da..a501c96fa4a 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-gherkin/test/statement-noted.test.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-gherkin/test/statement-noted.test.ts @@ -19,6 +19,11 @@ const statementNoted = { }; describe("the Gherkin verbatim-grade proposal floor", () => { + test("declares both its domain typology and target formalism", () => { + expect(gherkin.domainTypology).toBe("software behavior"); + expect(gherkin.targetFormalism).toBe("gherkin"); + }); + test("leaves rule coverage to the sweep, pattern, and check without a duplicate failure mode", () => { expect( gherkinDefinition.guidance.failure_modes.map( diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/package.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/package.json index 2bae7139230..f3fdf6215f8 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/package.json +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/package.json @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ "name": "@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn", "version": "0.0.0-private", "private": true, - "description": "The SDCPN target formalism: plugin definition, Flue instructions, runbook skill, and construction tools.", + "description": "The operational-process domain typology and SDCPN target formalism: plugin definition, Flue instructions, runbook skill, and construction tools.", "license": "AGPL-3.0", "type": "module", "exports": { diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml index 3e4a25ef885..392f829bd09 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml @@ -1,10 +1,11 @@ # The SDCPN plugin — authored under the harness-owned keys of ADR-0007. # -# Every key below is defined and taught by the harness; this file specialises each for one target -# formalism. Cells add to the harness default and never override it; a cell left blank means the -# default suffices. Nothing here may name a domain: the same file must serve any operational -# system unchanged. A case that seems to need a new row or a new key is a finding about the -# abstraction, recorded in the schema changelog, never content added here. +# Every key below is defined and taught by the harness; this file specialises each for one +# reusable domain typology paired with one target formalism. Cells add to the harness default and +# never override it; a cell left blank means the default suffices. Nothing here may name a concrete +# domain, situation, or scenario: the same file must serve any operational process unchanged. A case +# that seems to need a new row or a new key is a finding about the abstraction, recorded in the +# schema changelog, never content added here. # # Migrated from plugin.md (sdcpn/2026-08-25.1) with no semantic change to the three tables. The # guidance the v0 prompt contributed — open with objectives, slice then sweep, probe, keep the @@ -14,7 +15,8 @@ plugin: id: sdcpn - version: sdcpn/2026-08-26.2 + version: sdcpn/2026-09-01.1 + domain_typology: operational processes formalism: stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (Petrinaut) jobs: [construct, review-and-revise] purpose: | diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/index.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/index.ts index b65cd862f88..ad34e19b04d 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/index.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/index.ts @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ /** - * `@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn` — the SDCPN target formalism (ADR-0006). + * `@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn` — the operational-process domain + * typology paired with the SDCPN target formalism. * * The plugin is `plugin.yaml`: data under the harness-owned keys (ADR-0007) * whose contract keys the harness reads into the model vocabulary, the demand @@ -7,7 +8,7 @@ * what the repertoire teaches. This module loads that definition and declares * the one proposal type a kind-and-slot plugin needs: a slot assertion * addressed to a kind, node, and slot the definition names. The definition - * names no domain, and neither does this code. + * names no concrete domain, situation, or scenario, and neither does this code. * * This substrate-neutral descriptor depends inward on `@hashintel/brunch-agent` * and remains storage-blind. It is compiled and tested but not imported by the @@ -52,6 +53,7 @@ export type SlotAssertedProposalInput = v.InferInput< export const sdcpn = definePlugin({ name: "plugin-sdcpn", + domainTypology: sdcpnDefinition.identity.domainTypology, targetFormalism: "sdcpn", definition: sdcpnDefinition, proposalCatalog: [ diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/elicitation.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/elicitation.md index 3325eae4e4c..1100156c9a2 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/elicitation.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/elicitation.md @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ Who wins a contended resource. What a document says versus what people do. Unwri What observation or replay would make the result accurate enough. Do not ask the expert to predict the model's answer and store that prediction as structure. -## Target-formalism guidance +## Operational-process and SDCPN guidance ### Lenses diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/test/plugin.test.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/test/plugin.test.ts index 7a345a2ac20..ec5b05bd794 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/test/plugin.test.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/test/plugin.test.ts @@ -68,9 +68,10 @@ const capture = (assertion: SlotAssertion): CaptureEnvelope => { describe("the SDCPN plugin", () => { test("is the parsed file plus one slot-assertion proposal type", () => { + expect(sdcpn.domainTypology).toBe("operational processes"); expect(sdcpn.targetFormalism).toBe("sdcpn"); expect(sdcpn.definition).toBe(sdcpnDefinition); - expect(sdcpnDefinition.version).toBe("sdcpn/2026-08-26.2"); + expect(sdcpnDefinition.version).toBe("sdcpn/2026-09-01.1"); expect(sdcpn.proposalCatalog.map((proposal) => proposal.name)).toEqual([ "slot-asserted", ]); From 4719848d0f5d821c7e51645ae22448d9ac2cb4f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 15:25:20 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 026/101] Refine the five-register elicitation draft --- .../_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md | 6 +- .../five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md | 4 +- .../formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md | 69 ++--- .../plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md | 235 +++++++----------- .../sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md | 62 ++--- 5 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 237 deletions(-) diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md index b23cd37e76b..46dcb7aca20 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ This candidate remaps the current core prompt, SDCPN prompt material, runbook sk 10. Register headings are fixed, but contents remain freeform Markdown. No repeated card schema, machine-readable entry type, renderer, or completion algebra is proposed. 11. Plugin guidance may add context or narrow applicability; it does not silently weaken universal directives. 12. The separately authored progressive layers are composed into one packaged skill with Flue's native `defineSkill({ instructions, files })`. Markdown links guide the model but do not package, transclude, or automatically load resources. +13. The plugin profile is strictly additive and register-pure: it states only operational-process or SDCPN consequences absent from universal teaching; Recognition names signals and hypotheses, Operations names moves, Coverage names what to preserve, and Verification names failures and repairs. Lifecycle and construction routing remain in instructions and checks. +14. A workpiece claim, its evidence, and its epistemic treatment share one authoritative location under the relevant concern. Only unresolved matters spanning concerns or requiring later re-entry enter a compact cross-cutting issue ledger, which references rather than restates claims. ## Candidate topology @@ -51,8 +53,8 @@ five-register-synthesis/ - [`plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md`](plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md) selects operational-process/SDCPN modelling, requires skill activation, states workpiece-first construction, and protects the elicitation/construction boundary. - [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md) describes the conceptual lifecycle, distinguishes the currently available interactive and construct-only runtime branches, and routes to packaged resource names. - [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts.example`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts.example) shows Flue's native `defineSkill` composing the instructions, core-owned universal reference, and plugin-owned resources into one skill. Flue synthesizes the packaged `SKILL.md`. -- [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md) is the unified additive plugin profile coupling operational-process domain typology and SDCPN consequences. -- [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md) is the recoverable process-model artifact. +- [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md) is the register-pure additive plugin profile coupling operational-process domain typology and SDCPN consequences without repeating universal or lifecycle guidance. +- [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md) is the recoverable process-model artifact, with operational claims, evidence, and epistemic treatment co-located and a reference-only cross-cutting issue ledger. - [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md) contains construction mappings and patterns disclosed only during construction. - [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md) checks the workpiece-to-construction boundary, net structure, fidelity, revision, and delivery. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md index 68cff27e1a1..cf01fc7585a 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ This map accounts for the primary working and draft material used to produce the | `plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md` | Concise operational-process/SDCPN specialization and router | Active plugin `flue.ts` inline instruction; active APPEND role; current skill lifecycle and construction boundary | | `sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md` | Conceptual lifecycle, runtime branches, and packaged-resource routing | Active `sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md`; accepted Mission 3 information hierarchy; predecessor elicitation procedure | | `sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts.example` | Explicit composition of separately authored resources into one Flue skill | Installed Flue `defineSkill` contract; verified core-package → plugin-package → production Flue-app spike | -| `sdcpn-modelling/profile.md` | Unified operational-process domain typology and SDCPN profile under five registers | Active APPEND target material; active `elicitation.md` SDCPN/mixed material; Ciaran outline; current plugin YAML concepts | +| `sdcpn-modelling/profile.md` | Strictly additive operational-process domain typology and SDCPN profile under five role-pure registers | Active APPEND target material; active `elicitation.md` SDCPN/mixed material; Ciaran outline; current plugin YAML concepts | | `workpiece-template.md` | Provisional domain-primary recoverable process-model workpiece | Active `ir-template.md`; Mission 4 proof obligations; Ciaran investigation headings | | `coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md` | Workpiece paired with the formalism-primary Coverage alternative for a fair comparison | Active `ir-template.md`; formalism-primary Coverage candidate; Mission 4 proof obligations | | `pn-construction.md` | SDCPN mappings, construction patterns, inference, bounded change, and losses | Active `pn-construction.md`; APPEND `Maps To` material; Ciaran transformation patterns | @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ The active file's Ciaran-derived “What to investigate” headings seed the dom ### `ir-template.md` -The candidate retains a human-readable Markdown workpiece, full `runbook-ir` emission, expert vocabulary, assumptions, unknowns, conflict, omissions, and losses. It adds explicit homes for not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, correction, contextual coexistence, exact evidence, normalized account, agent inference, process spine, resource-use semantics, and construction-opened questions. These homes are structural aids, not mandatory per-statement types. Because Coverage indexing remains unresolved, the workbench contains aligned domain-primary and formalism-primary workpiece candidates rather than treating one artifact shape as settled. +The candidate retains a human-readable Markdown workpiece, full `runbook-ir` emission, expert vocabulary, assumptions, unknowns, conflict, omissions, and losses. Each operational claim now owns its exact evidence, normalized account, agent inference, assumption, correction, conflict, or contextual variation locally when those distinctions matter. A compact central ledger holds only unresolved matters spanning concerns or requiring re-entry and references rather than restates authoritative claims. These annotations are structural aids, not mandatory per-statement types. Because Coverage indexing remains unresolved, the workbench contains aligned domain-primary and formalism-primary workpiece candidates under the same locality rule rather than treating one artifact shape as settled. ### `pn-construction.md` diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md index 45f519c8ca6..770b25d8e92 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md @@ -2,9 +2,15 @@ This workpiece candidate pairs with [`formalism-primary.md`](formalism-primary.md). It exists to compare Coverage indexing fairly; do not load it alongside the domain-primary `../workpiece-template.md` in one run. -It is structurally organized but not a closed semantic claim system. Follow the person's thread during the conversation; do not read these headings aloud as a questionnaire. Each active fact has one authoritative home. +It is structurally organized but not a closed semantic claim system. Follow the person's thread during the conversation; do not read these headings aloud as a questionnaire. -Use distinctions such as **Expert evidence**, **Working account**, **Agent inference**, **Assumed**, **Unknown**, **Not yet asked**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, **Conflict**, **Correction**, **Contextual variation**, **Omitted**, and **Loss** only where they carry information. They are not mandatory fields on every statement. +## Locality rule + +Every operational claim has one authoritative home under the relevant target concern. Keep exact expert wording, normalized interpretation, agent inference, uncertainty, assumptions, corrections, conflicts, and contextual variation beside that claim when those distinctions matter. Do not repeat the claim in a centralized evidence section or ledger. + +Labels such as **Expert evidence**, **Working account**, **Agent inference**, **Assumed**, **Unknown**, **Not yet asked**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, **Conflict**, **Correction**, **Contextual variation**, **Omitted**, and **Loss** are optional annotations, not mandatory fields or a closed type system. An assumption states why it was introduced and how it could be checked. A correction identifies the account it replaces without leaving both active. Contextual coexistence keeps each account beside the condition selecting it. + +Use the cross-cutting issue ledger only when an unresolved matter affects several authoritative claims or needs a later return path. Ledger entries reference those claims; they do not summarize them again. Whenever this workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit the full latest document again before a construction handoff and before workpiece-only delivery. @@ -23,7 +29,7 @@ Whenever this workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in ## Target-relevant operational account -These concepts are filing and checking addresses, not interview order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose; keep consequential unsupported material visible. +These concepts are filing and checking addresses, not interview order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose; keep consequential unsupported material visible. Place each operational claim once and attach evidence or epistemic annotations at that location when needed. ### Objectives @@ -83,53 +89,15 @@ Variables a real data source could drive, their source, units, update behavior, Observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment that would make the model credible enough for its intended use. -## Cross-cutting evidence and interpretation - -Keep evidence beside the affected material where practical. Use this section for evidence or interpretation that bears across several target concepts. - -### Exact expert evidence - -### Normalized account - -### Agent inferences and proposed structure - -### Contextual quantities and regimes - -## Open matters and authorship - -### Assumptions - -For each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked. - -### Unknown to the person - -### Not yet asked +## Cross-cutting issue ledger -### Declined +Use only for an unresolved matter that affects several target concerns or needs later re-entry. In one compact entry, reference the authoritative claim locations, state what remains unresolved and what it prevents, and name the evidence or event that would re-enter it. Do not copy the affected claims here. -### Deferred and deposits - -For each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it. - -### Ambiguities and conflicts - -Preserve alternatives and their evidence. Do not choose or average without support. - -### Corrections - -State the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active. - -### Contextual coexistence - -Preserve accounts that differ by person, time, operating condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one. - -### Deliberate omissions and simplifications - -State what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong. +- **** — affects: ; unresolved: ; consequence: ; re-enter when: . ## Construction notes -Open this section when construction begins; do not use it to script ordinary elicitation. +Open this section when construction begins; do not use it to script ordinary elicitation. Reference authoritative workpiece claims rather than reproducing them. ### Candidate target structures @@ -141,6 +109,8 @@ Open this section when construction begins; do not use it to script ordinary eli ## Delivery status +Summarize status by reference to the authoritative account and issue ledger; do not create a second model summary. + ### What this workpiece currently supports ### Consequential gaps @@ -150,6 +120,15 @@ Open this section when construction begins; do not use it to script ordinary eli State whether no construction was attempted, construction is blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone. ``` +## Maintenance guidance + +- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions even when filing them under target concerns. +- Update the claim at its authoritative location when understanding changes; do not append a competing summary elsewhere. +- Keep evidence and epistemic treatment local even when a cross-cutting issue references the claim. +- Update the authoritative ordering-flow section when case behavior changes; reference local activity and entity claims rather than repeating them. +- Empty sections may be removed when irrelevant. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, or **Omitted** only when that state itself matters to later work. +- Construction consumes this workpiece. If construction needs transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that point. + ## Comparison pressure This shape makes target obligations and formalism-indexed verification easy to find. It may also make the workpiece feel like a schema and may force actors, locations, resources, triggers, and process failures to be translated across several headings. Compare whether that translation burden is lower or higher than the domain-primary candidate's risk of hiding target distinctions. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md index 90ec360f1c5..1a6dac43f97 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md @@ -1,268 +1,219 @@ # Operational-Process / SDCPN Profile -This profile adds reusable operational-process domain typology and SDCPN target-formalism guidance to the universal elicitation reference. It contains no facts about a particular operation. Apply both layers under the same five registers; where this profile is silent, universal guidance still applies. +This profile adds the operational-process domain typology and SDCPN target-formalism concerns that are absent from the universal elicitation reference. It contains no facts about a particular operation. Apply both layers under the same five registers; where this profile is silent, universal guidance still applies. -The registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the workpiece may need to preserve for this purpose and target. SDCPN construction mechanics remain in the separately disclosed `references/pn-construction.md` resource. +The registers are addresses, not a questionnaire or phase sequence. Recognition names operational signals and the hypotheses they support. Operations adapt universal interviewing moves to process modelling. Coverage states what an SDCPN-oriented workpiece may need to preserve. Verification detects target-specific gaps. Construction mapping is outside this profile. ## Directives -### Build the process description the purpose needs +### Model for an explicit simulation use -Elicit or revise an operational account that can support the person's stated simulation question or decision. Establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use. +Develop an operational account that can support the person's stated simulation question or decision. Establish what may be varied, what response matters, and what observation would make the model credible enough for that use. Detail that cannot affect the stated use does not become necessary merely because the process contains it. -### Keep operational language in the foreground +### Keep formal notation backstage -Ask about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, and target schemas are backstage construction concepts. They may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions. +Ask about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, and target schemas may guide internal attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions. -### Maintain the workpiece before the net +### Preserve distinctions that can change simulated behavior -The process-model workpiece is the recoverable account elicitation and revision maintain. Construction consumes it rather than rereading the transcript as the primary model. If a target distinction matters but the evidence is missing, preserve the gap in the workpiece instead of constructing a plausible default. - -### Preserve target-relevant context - -A value without its applicable entity, activity, direction, operating regime, calendar, load, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Do not average prescribed and practiced accounts or distinct operating conditions merely to obtain one parameter. - -### Separate evidence from precision - -A narrowly stated value is not necessarily well supported, and a well-supported account may remain broad. Preserve both what the person or source supports and how narrow the value is. Do not force a distribution, rate, or threshold below the granularity the operation can observe. - -### Treat patterns as hypotheses - -Operational situation patterns expose conditional information needs; they do not generate the process model. Ask whether a pattern is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary. - -### Keep elicitation and construction reversible - -Construction may reveal that a distinction is missing, ambiguous, or unrepresentable. Return to the smallest relevant question, update the workpiece, and reconstruct. Do not reinterpret the transcript silently to rescue a net. - -### Construct only through available authority - -When Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition govern net changes. When they are absent, prepare construction-ready workpiece material without claiming that a loadable or simulatable net exists. +Keep entity or activity type, direction, operating regime, calendar, load, resource state, and other selecting conditions when they change what occurs or how a quantity applies. Do not collapse distinct operational contexts into one target parameter for convenience. ## Recognition -Recognition entries name possibilities, not facts or automatic next steps. Confirm the operational meaning before recording or constructing it. +Recognition entries identify possibilities, not facts or automatic next steps. Confirm the operational meaning before recording it. -### Language and account signals +### Language and situation signals -- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction between types of work or resource. -- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption with an occurrence pattern and duration, a blocked prerequisite, or an uncontrolled boundary input. -- **“We would,” “the procedure says,” or “you are supposed to”** may indicate prescribed behavior whose relationship to practice remains unknown. -- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, invariant, or unexamined exception. -- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a threshold, or a mode change with time, material, or capacity loss. -- **A duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone. -- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, or dataset named in passing** may participate as a performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, or merely contextual detail. -- **A place named in the account** may matter as a boundary, capacity, eligibility condition, source of travel time, state distinction, or resource. A physical location does not imply a Petri-net place. -- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than a normal process step. -- **A memorable failure** identifies a mechanism and consequence, not its probability. +- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction between types of work or resource. +- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, or uncontrolled boundary input. +- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate an operational constraint, policy, or exception boundary. +- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a threshold, or a mode change. +- **A duration crossing a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may indicate that availability and elapsed work time differ. +- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, or dataset named in passing** may play the role of performer, contended resource, prerequisite, or information source. +- **A physical location** may matter through boundary, capacity, eligibility, travel, state, or resource effects; it does not imply a Petri-net place. +- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what admits or enables work rather than an ordinary step. -### Operational situation patterns +### Recurring operational shapes #### Timed work -A step occupies elapsed time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what is unavailable while it runs, whether duration is constant enough for the purpose, what variation or tail matters, and whether time depends on load, type, calendar, or resource availability. +A step occupies elapsed time or timing affects the objective. This may require distinguishing an activity from its in-progress interval. -#### Probabilistic or conditional outcome +#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome -A step is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the branch, what each branch produces, whether an observed rate exists, which conditions alter it, and what recovery follows. +The same activity can produce different outcomes. This may require a deciding condition, observed likelihood, or explicit unknown. #### Contended resource -Several activities want the same people, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or other limited capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, reservation and release, eligibility, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and a borderline case that exposes the real rule. +Several activities want the same limited capability. This may be a reusable resource that becomes unavailable while held rather than an input that is consumed. #### Consumed, reserved, or read input -A step uses an input in one of several materially different ways. It may consume or transform it, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities. +An activity uses something by transforming it, holding it temporarily, or observing it without making it unavailable. The same thing may play different roles in different activities. #### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement -Work moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include what forms a group, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group. +Work moves or is processed as a group whose formation, cohesion, split, or release may affect behavior. #### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite -Work becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external to the process, and what overrides it. +An observable event or condition enables work. It may originate outside the process or be produced by an earlier activity. #### Mode change -Setup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, cascade effects, and the source of an unknown loss. +Setup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next and may have direction-dependent loss. #### Event rather than step -A failure, interruption, deadline expiry, unplanned arrival, or external trigger befalls the operation rather than advancing its normal flow. Possible distinctions include occurrence, duration, affected work, effect on the case, recovery, and dependence on operating state. +A failure, interruption, deadline expiry, or unplanned arrival befalls the operation rather than advancing its normal flow. #### Threshold on a changing quantity -A level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity crosses a consequential boundary. Possible distinctions include direction and rate of change, noise, what crossing triggers, which activity resets it, and whether several components combine or compete. +A level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other evolving quantity crosses a boundary that changes process behavior. #### Policy under pressure -More than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions under which a different rule applies. +More than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. The practiced selection rule may differ from the posted rule. #### Hidden waiting -A gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, resource contention, calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically a node to elicit. +A gap between activities may reflect an unavailable input, resource, calendar, release rule, batch, transport, approval, or recovery condition rather than an independently elicited queue. #### Failure, retry, and recovery -A case can fail to complete, repeat part or all of its work, enter an unhappy path, degrade, or recover. Possible distinctions include the entering condition, affected work and resources, outputs, rollback or compensation, retry limit, and terminal outcome. +A case can fail to complete, repeat part or all of its work, enter an unhappy path, degrade, or recover. ## Operations -Use the universal Operations as the primary interviewing methods. These additions bind those methods to operational-process and SDCPN concerns. - -### Choose the case unit before slicing +Use the universal Operations as the interviewing methods. These moves bind them to operational-process and SDCPN concerns. -When several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow that unit from the event that admits it to the outcome that ends or hands it beyond the chosen boundary. +### Choose the case unit -### Link the slice to the objective - -As the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective still depends on nothing in the account, say that the supporting process is missing and continue the slice rather than collecting detached detail. +When several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Use that unit for the first slice. ### Expose the process spine -Ask what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine. - -### Sweep operational concerns, not headings - -After the slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, type-dependent variation, practiced policy, failure/recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality. Do not march through every Coverage subsection merely because it exists. +Follow the chosen case from admission to outcome. Ask what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs, and what ends or hands off the case. -### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs +### Link the slice to the simulation objective -For each load-bearing activity/input relation, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns. Use operational phrasing before target-formalism terms. +As the case unfolds, ask which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated simulation question depends on. Return to the case when the objective still has no operational support. -### Sweep what can befall an activity +### Sweep one operational relation -Across the activities the slice exposed, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, resource unavailability, external event, and constraint violation. For each one the person recognizes, establish what happens to the work in hand, to the case, to occupied resources, and during recovery. +After the slice, choose one objective-relevant relation and examine it across the things already discovered. Useful process sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, type-dependent variation, practiced policy, failure/recovery, and boundary behavior. -### Test practiced policy with a borderline case +### Classify activity inputs -When a document or general rule says who goes next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case. Preserve the prescribed account, practiced account, and the context that selects between them rather than averaging them. +For each load-bearing activity/input relation, ask whether the input is transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. For a reserved input, follow when and in what state it returns. -### Close a resource account +### Trace disruption and recovery -For a contended resource, establish how many usable instances exist, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability. +For a disruption the person recognizes, follow what happens to the work in hand, the whole case, occupied resources, retry, recovery, and terminal outcome. -### Close a mode change in both directions +### Test contention with a borderline case -Ask whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does. +When demand can exceed a resource's availability, ask about a recent contested or exceptional case to expose the practiced priority, tie-break, override, acquisition, and release behavior. -### Turn waiting into a causal question +### Follow waiting to its enabling condition -Ask what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or failure condition rather than naming a queue merely because waiting exists. +Ask what the case is waiting for and which observable event makes it able to continue. Locate the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or recovery condition. -### Ask what is conserved +### Compare both directions of a mode change -When quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a target-relevant constraint only when the person's account supports it. +Ask whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether the loss propagates beyond the local activity. Pursue time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences only where the operation distinguishes them. -### Establish validation from observable behavior +### Surface conservation -Ask what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Do not ask the person to predict the model's answer and store that prediction as process structure. +When quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. -### Re-enter from construction +### Anchor validation in an observable comparison -When construction cannot choose among materially different structures without inventing a fact, name the smallest missing operational distinction and formulate the question in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, deposit the question for a later elicitation and stop the unsupported construction path. +Ask what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the simulation model credible for its intended question. Do not substitute the person's prediction of the answer for validation of the modeled process. ## Coverage -Coverage identifies what the workpiece may need for the stated objective and downstream SDCPN construction. It is not a questionnaire, a closed ontology, or a demand to populate irrelevant sections. +Coverage identifies what the workpiece may need for the stated simulation use and later SDCPN construction. It is not a questionnaire, closed ontology, or demand to populate irrelevant sections. ### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds -Preserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, or threshold the person can actually judge. An objective needs a traceable dependency on the operational account. Quantitative objectives may need metrics; qualitative objectives must not be forced into invented weights. - -Keep qualitative goals and trade-offs in the workpiece when the person cannot support a numerical measure. Construction guidance owns the later choice of target representation. +Preserve what the model must answer or compare, what may be varied, what should improve or be avoided, what “better” means, and any trade-off, safety condition, or threshold the person can judge. Record which operational material each objective depends on. Qualitative goals remain qualitative when no supported metric or weight exists. ### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions -Preserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and reliability of boundary inputs. Distinguish a trigger from an ordinary activity and a prerequisite from a resource that the activity consumes. - -These concerns define the operational starting and enabling context. Construction guidance owns how that context is represented. +Preserve what is inside and outside; what enters or leaves; what starts or admits a case; calendars and availability; approvals or instructions; external events; initial populations; and reliability of boundary inputs. ### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources -Preserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations affect behavior. A resource is a domain-facing role, not necessarily a separate target kind: its instances may be represented as typed elements subject to policy, capacity, and availability. - -A physical location deserves target representation only when the operation treats being there as consequential. Construction guidance owns the representational choice. +Preserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; consequential carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and the operational effect of location. A resource is a role combining a usable thing with availability, capacity, and contention behavior, not necessarily a separate target kind. ### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use -For each consequential activity, preserve its name in operational vocabulary, preconditions, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed/reserved/read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, occurrence if it is an event, mode-change loss, and variation by type or context. +For each consequential activity, preserve its operational name, preconditions, performer, inputs, consumed/reserved/read use, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, occurrence when it is an event, mode-change loss, and variation by type or context. ### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery -Preserve the order activities occur, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery behavior, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes. Activities without stated order do not yet form a constructible process spine. +Preserve activity order, branch and join conditions, interruptions, unhappy paths, retry and recovery behavior, effects on work and occupied resources, and terminal outcomes. Activities without stated order do not yet form a process spine. ### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior -Preserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, dependence on type/load/calendar/state, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets. Keep unsupported precision broad or parameterized rather than manufacturing a distribution. +Preserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, dependence on type/load/calendar/state, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets. Keep each value at the context and precision its source supports. ### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes -Preserve the rule applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds. Determine whether divergence is correction, unresolved conflict, or contextual coexistence. - -Construction later determines which rules are representable. Political judgment, unnamed exceptions, and unsupported conditions remain workpiece-only and must appear as losses rather than invented logic. +Preserve the rule used when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed and practiced accounts, and the context selecting each account. Keep correction, unresolved conflict, and contextual coexistence distinguishable. ### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings -Preserve how the person would know the model is credible for its intended question, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, who or what is authoritative for missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable. - -Live data connections and qualitative validation may remain unsupported by the current target tooling; preserve them in the workpiece rather than implying implementation. +Preserve the observation or comparison that would make the model credible, variables a real source might drive, units and update context, who or what is authoritative for missing values, and evidence that is not currently available. Unsupported live bindings and qualitative validation remain workpiece knowledge rather than implied implementation. -### Cross-cutting evidence and uncertainty +### Cross-cutting simulation qualifiers -For every consequential concern, preserve the person's exact evidence where wording matters; normalized account; agent inference; assumption with reason and check; unknown, unasked, declined, or deferred material; unresolved conflict; correction; contextual variation; omission; and known target loss as applicable. These are workpiece obligations, not mandatory labels on every sentence. +Across the concerns above, preserve only the target-relevant qualifiers not already supplied by the universal reference: entity or activity type, direction, operating regime, calendar, load, resource state, and the context and supported precision of simulation quantities. -### Things not independently elicited as target nodes +### Concepts that do not imply independent target nodes -- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by the activities and conditions around it and may emerge as target structure during construction. -- A scenario is assembled for simulation from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies; it is not necessarily one elicited process element. -- A resource is an operational role that may combine entity distinctions, capacity, availability, and policy rather than requiring one universal target node shape. -- A location is operational context until its effect on state, eligibility, travel, capacity, boundary, or resource use is established. +- Waiting is explained by surrounding activities and enabling conditions and may later produce target structure. +- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies. +- A resource combines a usable thing with capacity, availability, and contention behavior. +- A physical location becomes target-relevant only through an operational effect. ## Verification -Use this register while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Read and apply `references/checks.md` when preparing to construct or delivering a net. +These checks assess the elicited operational account and its readiness for SDCPN construction. Universal Verification continues to own authorship, uncertainty, interaction load, generic divergence, and honest stopping. ### Purpose and spine - At least one simulation question, decision, or comparison is stated in the person's terms. -- The workpiece identifies a meaningful process boundary and at least one concrete case. -- The case has an explicit trigger or admission, ordered activities, branch conditions where present, and an outcome or handoff. -- Every objective depends on recorded process material or is visibly marked unsupported. +- The account identifies a meaningful process boundary and concrete case. +- The case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, branch conditions where present, and an outcome or handoff. +- Every claimed objective depends on recorded process material or is visibly unsupported. ### Resources and activity semantics -- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. -- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where the objective needs it. -- Hidden waiting is explained through a prerequisite, availability, policy, calendar, batching, transport, or disruption when the evidence supports one. -- Mode-change losses preserve direction and context where they differ. - -### Time and uncertainty - -- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold preserves the context and precision the evidence supports. -- One incident has not silently become a frequency. -- A point value is used only when constancy or purpose-relative simplification is supported and named. -- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value. +- Each load-bearing input is classified as consumed, reserved/released, or read. +- Each objective-relevant contended resource has acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and an honest count or unknown. +- Waiting is associated with an evidenced enabling condition rather than treated as a self-explanatory queue. +- Direction-dependent mode changes retain their distinct losses. -### Authorship and change +### Time and contextual variation -- Exact expert evidence, normalized account, and agent inference remain distinguishable where consequential. -- A genuine correction leaves one active account while retaining enough history to explain the change. -- Conflict and contextual coexistence retain multiple accounts with their unresolved or selecting conditions. -- Unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred states are not conflated. +- Each consequential duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains its applicable context and supported precision. +- A point value represents evidenced constancy or a named purpose-relative simplification, not missing variation. +- Prescribed/practiced regimes and other contextual variants remain distinct where they change behavior. ### Construction readiness -- Construction can identify what flows, what happens, in what order, what enables it, and what resources it occupies without inventing a missing process spine. -- Target-relevant gaps and unrepresentable material are explicit. -- The workpiece, not transcript memory, contains the information construction would use. -- Failure of one check returns to the smallest relevant Coverage concern or Operation; it does not license filling the gap from generic process knowledge. +- The workpiece states what flows, what happens, in what order, what enables it, and what reusable resources it occupies. +- Target-relevant gaps and material known to be unrepresentable are visible. +- Construction can use the workpiece without recovering a load-bearing operational fact from transcript memory. -### Failure signals and repairs +### Target-specific failure signals and repairs -- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on the objective. -- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question. -- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use coverage. -- **Policy from paper:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence probe. -- **Point estimate as distribution:** one average stands for consequential variation. Restore the evidence-supported form and investigate typical versus tail only if the objective needs it. -- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies. -- **Net vocabulary in the interview:** questions are framed as places, transitions, or arcs. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences. +- **Unsupported simulation objective:** no process material bears on the question. Return to a concrete case that can expose the dependency. +- **Dead process spine:** activities exist without order, admission, or outcome. Continue the slice at the missing connection. +- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired without release or an explicit terminal loss. Re-enter the activity/input relation. +- **Posted policy compiled as practice:** a document supplies the operative rule without an observed case. Test a contested or exceptional case. +- **Unsupported stochastic precision:** an average or invented distribution replaces consequential variation. Restore the source-supported value and context. +- **Pattern-generated process fact:** a recurring shape supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove the claim or ask whether the shape applies. +- **Formalism-shaped interview:** questions are framed as places, transitions, or arcs. Translate the active gap back into operational events, conditions, things, and consequences. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md index 0970e86c1da..bc416074866 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md @@ -2,9 +2,13 @@ This domain-primary workpiece is maintained during elicitation and revision and consumed during construction. It is structurally organized but not a closed semantic claim system. Follow the person's thread during the conversation; do not read these headings aloud as a questionnaire. -Keep one cold-readable current account. Preserve exact evidence, normalized interpretation, uncertainty, and construction notes without duplicating the same active fact across summaries. +## Locality rule -Use distinctions such as **Expert evidence**, **Working account**, **Agent inference**, **Assumed**, **Unknown**, **Not yet asked**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, **Conflict**, **Correction**, **Contextual variation**, **Omitted**, and **Loss** only where they carry information. They are not mandatory fields on every statement. +Every operational claim has one authoritative home under the relevant purpose or operational concern. Keep exact expert wording, normalized interpretation, agent inference, uncertainty, assumptions, corrections, conflicts, and contextual variation beside that claim when those distinctions matter. Do not repeat the claim in a centralized evidence section or ledger. + +Labels such as **Expert evidence**, **Working account**, **Agent inference**, **Assumed**, **Unknown**, **Not yet asked**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, **Conflict**, **Correction**, **Contextual variation**, **Omitted**, and **Loss** are optional annotations, not mandatory fields or a closed type system. An assumption states why it was introduced and how it could be checked. A correction identifies the account it replaces without leaving both active. Contextual coexistence keeps each account beside the condition selecting it. + +Use the cross-cutting issue ledger only when an unresolved matter affects several authoritative claims or needs a later return path. Ledger entries reference those claims; they do not summarize them again. Whenever this workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit the full latest document again before a construction handoff and before workpiece-only delivery. @@ -25,7 +29,7 @@ Whenever this workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in ## Operational account -These are filing homes, not interview order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose; keep a consequential omission visible. Each active fact has one authoritative home. +These are filing homes, not interview order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose; keep a consequential omission visible. Place each operational claim once and attach evidence or epistemic annotations at that location when needed. ### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds @@ -61,51 +65,15 @@ Add only when a different case exposes structure the primary case does not. ### Validation evidence and data sources -## Evidence and interpretation - -Keep evidence beside the affected process material where practical. Use this section for evidence that bears across several parts of the account or whose relationship requires explanation. - -### Exact expert evidence - -### Normalized account - -### Agent inferences and proposed structure - -## Open matters and authorship - -### Assumptions - -For each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked. - -### Unknown to the person - -### Not yet asked +## Cross-cutting issue ledger -### Declined +Use only for an unresolved matter that affects several concerns or needs later re-entry. In one compact entry, reference the authoritative claim locations, state what remains unresolved and what it prevents, and name the evidence or event that would re-enter it. Do not copy the affected claims here. -### Deferred and deposits - -For each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it. - -### Ambiguities and conflicts - -Preserve alternatives and the evidence for each. Do not choose or average without support. - -### Corrections - -State the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active. - -### Contextual coexistence - -Preserve accounts that differ by person, time, operating condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one. - -### Deliberate omissions and simplifications - -State what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong. +- **** — affects: ; unresolved: ; consequence: ; re-enter when: . ## Construction notes -Open this section when construction begins; do not use it to script ordinary elicitation. +Open this section when construction begins; do not use it to script ordinary elicitation. Reference authoritative workpiece claims rather than reproducing them. ### Candidate target structures @@ -117,6 +85,8 @@ Open this section when construction begins; do not use it to script ordinary eli ## Delivery status +Summarize status by reference to the authoritative account and issue ledger; do not create a second model summary. + ### What this workpiece currently supports ### Consequential gaps @@ -129,8 +99,8 @@ State whether no construction was attempted, construction is blocked, a partial ## Maintenance guidance - Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions. -- Update the authoritative case-and-process-spine section when ordering or case behavior changes; do not accumulate competing summaries. -- A restatement you offered remains your normalization even when accepted. Preserve exact evidence separately where origin matters. -- For a genuine correction, update the active account and note what changed. For unresolved conflict or contextual coexistence, keep the accounts separately visible. +- Update the claim at its authoritative location when understanding changes; do not append a competing summary elsewhere. +- Keep evidence and epistemic treatment local even when a cross-cutting issue references the claim. +- Update the authoritative case-and-process-spine section when ordering or case behavior changes; reference local activity and resource claims rather than repeating them. - Empty sections may be removed when irrelevant. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, or **Omitted** only when that state itself matters to later work. - Construction consumes this workpiece. If construction needs transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that point. From 0862554c13730d03876d3d8971df493595426494 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 15:32:52 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 027/101] Calibrate evidence claims in the runbook draft --- .../_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md | 3 +- .../five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md | 2 +- .../plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md | 96 ++++++++++++------- .../formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md | 2 +- .../sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md | 4 +- .../sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md | 2 +- .../sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts.example | 2 +- .../sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md | 2 +- 8 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-) diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md index 46dcb7aca20..83628b21927 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ This candidate remaps the current core prompt, SDCPN prompt material, runbook sk 12. The separately authored progressive layers are composed into one packaged skill with Flue's native `defineSkill({ instructions, files })`. Markdown links guide the model but do not package, transclude, or automatically load resources. 13. The plugin profile is strictly additive and register-pure: it states only operational-process or SDCPN consequences absent from universal teaching; Recognition names signals and hypotheses, Operations names moves, Coverage names what to preserve, and Verification names failures and repairs. Lifecycle and construction routing remain in instructions and checks. 14. A workpiece claim, its evidence, and its epistemic treatment share one authoritative location under the relevant concern. Only unresolved matters spanning concerns or requiring later re-entry enter a compact cross-cutting issue ledger, which references rather than restates claims. +15. Construction evidence is reported at one of three non-collapsible levels: tool-schema acceptance, agent-reviewed structural correspondence, and behavior observed through an actual execution or stronger analysis. Every claim stays within the scope of the method that produced it. ## Candidate topology @@ -56,7 +57,7 @@ five-register-synthesis/ - [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md) is the register-pure additive plugin profile coupling operational-process domain typology and SDCPN consequences without repeating universal or lifecycle guidance. - [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md) is the recoverable process-model artifact, with operational claims, evidence, and epistemic treatment co-located and a reference-only cross-cutting issue ledger. - [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md) contains construction mappings and patterns disclosed only during construction. -- [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md) checks the workpiece-to-construction boundary, net structure, fidelity, revision, and delivery. +- [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md) separates tool-schema acceptance, agent-reviewed structural correspondence, and behavioral execution or stronger analysis before checking fidelity, revision, and delivery. ## How to read the synthesized set diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md index cf01fc7585a..b18c61d7b9e 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ Mapping principles, tool-authoritative construction, reusable patterns, visible ### `checks.md` -Elicitation sufficiency and workpiece-only delivery checks live in the universal and plugin Verification registers. Phase-specific `checks.md` is disclosed only for construction and net delivery; it owns PN validity, resource return, ordering, loss review, bounded net-change checks, and honest net-status reporting. Closed stopping-outcome codes are replaced by plain observed-state reporting. +Elicitation sufficiency and workpiece-only delivery checks live in the universal and plugin Verification registers. Phase-specific `checks.md` is disclosed only for construction and net delivery; it distinguishes tool-schema acceptance from agent-reviewed structural correspondence and from behavior observed through an actual execution or stronger analysis. Candidate paths, resource-return structures, and exclusive guards found by static review are no longer presented as reachability, conservation, or behavioral exclusivity proofs. Closed stopping-outcome codes are replaced by plain evidence-level and observed-state reporting. ## Ciaran outline diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md index f430d3c6124..69d0845b87f 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md @@ -2,7 +2,25 @@ Read this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. For workpiece-only delivery, apply the universal and plugin Verification registers without loading this construction resource. -A failed check triggers the smallest relevant repair available in the current runtime branch: amend the workpiece, ask during interactive elicitation, revise construction, or report a visible limitation and re-entry question for a later conversation. Parser acceptance proves only that the accepted structure meets the tool schema. +A failed check triggers the smallest relevant repair available in the current runtime branch: amend the workpiece, ask during interactive elicitation, revise construction, or report a visible limitation and re-entry question for a later conversation. + +## Evidence levels + +Report the highest level actually reached. Passing one level does not imply the next. + +### 1. Tool-schema acceptance + +The mounted construction tools accepted the submitted payloads, and the latest inspected definition contains the accepted changes. This establishes conformance to those tool input schemas and the shape returned by inspection. It does not establish correspondence with the workpiece, reachability, resource conservation, exclusivity over executions, loadability in another consumer, or simulated behavior. + +### 2. Agent-reviewed structural correspondence + +The agent compared the inspected definition with the workpiece and found visible structures corresponding to the recorded process. This can establish that named elements, connections, candidate paths, guards, resource-return structures, and parameters are present and apparently aligned. It remains a review judgment over static structure, not behavioral proof. + +### 3. Behavioral execution or stronger analysis + +An actual simulation, state-space exploration, invariant check, or other named analysis exercised the constructed definition. State exactly which method, scenario, initial state, parameters, paths, and observations were covered. A simulation run establishes only the behavior observed in that run; a universal claim such as “resources cannot leak” requires an analysis whose scope genuinely covers every relevant execution. + +If no behavioral execution or stronger analysis occurred, say so. Do not convert tool acceptance or visual inspection into behavioral validation. ## Before construction @@ -18,46 +36,54 @@ A failed check triggers the smallest relevant repair available in the current ru If the missing material admits materially different process structures, formulate the smallest resolving question before constructing. Ask it only during interactive elicitation; in construct-only execution, return it as a blocking re-entry question. If the person has stopped, deliver the partial workpiece instead of opening a new topic. -## During construction +## Tool-schema acceptance checks + +- Every intended construction call was accepted or its rejection remains explicitly unresolved. +- The latest inspected definition contains each accepted place, transition, type, parameter, and connection under the identifier returned or supplied. +- Every referenced endpoint exists in the inspected definition. +- Arc weights or multiplicities are positive and conform to the mounted schema. +- No later step depends on a rejected or absent change. + +Re-inspect after dependent stages and once at the end. Record rejected calls and repairs. Describe this result as **tool-schema accepted**, not valid, runnable, or simulated. + +## Agent-reviewed structural correspondence + +Compare the latest inspected definition with the authoritative workpiece claims. -- Every place, transition, connection, type, parameter, guard, priority, timing rule, and dynamic has workpiece support or a visible construction assumption. -- Activities appear in the order and branching structure the workpiece claims. -- Arc weights or multiplicities are positive and follow the mounted schema. -- A consumed input does not return unless an output recreates it. -- A reserved resource is unavailable while held and returns on every recorded release, failure, cancellation, or recovery path. -- Read-only information remains available to concurrent work. -- Exclusive outcomes are structurally exclusive under the recorded rule or parameter. -- Directional mode changes preserve their direction-specific losses. -- Continuous dynamics have a consequential threshold, effect, or observed objective. -- Waiting emerges from recorded conditions rather than an unsupported queue object. -- No missing probability silently became an even split. +- The definition contains at least one meaningful place and transition corresponding to the process account. +- It contains a candidate structural path from a represented initial or admitted condition toward an outcome. This does not establish that the path can fire. +- Visible branches, joins, loops, and recovery structures correspond to the workpiece's stated ordering and conditions. +- For each enumerated resource-holding path, the intended acquisition and return structures are present. This does not establish conservation over every execution. +- Consumed inputs lack an unintended return structure; reserved inputs have an intended return structure; read-only information remains visibly available by the chosen representation. +- Mutually exclusive outcomes or modes have apparently exclusive guards or structure. This does not establish that they can never overlap at runtime. +- Direction-dependent mode changes retain distinct structural losses where the workpiece requires them. +- Continuous dynamics have a recorded quantity, consequential threshold or effect, and workpiece support. +- Required parameters and initial populations are represented or explicitly named as external inputs. +- Waiting is explained by recorded surrounding conditions rather than an unsupported queue object. -When mounted tools reject a change, repair the rejected call before depending on it. Inspect the latest definition after dependent stages and at the end. +Record discrepancies and the agent judgment used to resolve or preserve them. Describe a passing result as **structurally reviewed against the workpiece**. -## Structural validity +## Behavioral evidence -Using the mounted inspection capability, confirm: +Only report observations produced by an actual execution or named stronger analysis. -- the net contains at least one meaningful place and transition; -- every referenced identifier exists; -- every connection has valid endpoints and positive multiplicity; -- the normal process path can progress from its represented initial or admitted state to an outcome under at least one supported condition; -- branches, joins, loops, and recovery paths correspond to the workpiece; -- reusable resources are not leaked or duplicated across paths; -- exclusive modes cannot be active together unless the workpiece permits it; -- required parameters and initial populations are represented or named as external inputs; -- tool validation has no unresolved rejection. +- Record the exact definition revision, scenario, initial state, parameters, duration or stopping condition, and analysis method. +- State which process path or property was exercised. +- For a simulation, report only observed progress, resource balances, mode states, outputs, and failures from the runs performed. +- For state-space or invariant analysis, report the explored scope, assumptions, and any unexamined behaviors. +- Relate each observation back to the workpiece objective it bears on. +- Preserve failures and counterexamples; do not summarize them as a pass because another run succeeded. -Missing canvas positions are acceptable unless the available consumer requires them. +No behavioral tool or result means no behavioral claim. ## Fidelity and uncertainty -- Every load-bearing net choice traces to the workpiece or a named construction inference, approximation, or default. +- Every load-bearing net choice traces to an authoritative workpiece claim or a named construction inference, approximation, or default. - No hedge has been hardened solely to satisfy a schema. - No conflict has been averaged and no contextual value has been made universal without an accepted simplification. - Assumptions state why they were introduced, what they affect, and how they could be checked. - Material retained only in the workpiece is named as a target or tooling loss rather than omitted silently. -- A constructed net has not been described as simulated unless an actual simulation run established that claim. +- The delivery distinguishes accepted structure, agent review, observed behavior, and universal guarantees. ## Revision checks @@ -67,22 +93,24 @@ When revising an existing workpiece or analyzing a requested net change: - the prior and current account are distinguishable as correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence; - the desired net delta follows from changed workpiece meaning; - unsupported update or removal operations are reported rather than imitated with competing additive structure; -- any applied additive net changes preserve the intended existing structure; +- any applied additive net changes preserve the intended existing structure at the level actually inspected; - assumptions and losses displaced or introduced by the revision are reported; - the delivery distinguishes what changed from what was only inspected and says what the model can now support that it could not support before, or vice versa. ## Delivery -Always deliver the current recoverable workpiece. Deliver the net only if construction occurred through available tools and the resulting definition was inspected. +Always deliver the current recoverable workpiece. Deliver a net only if construction occurred through available tools and the resulting definition was inspected. State plainly: -- what question or decision the result can support; -- whether the workpiece is complete enough for the stated purpose or partial with named gaps; -- whether no net was attempted, construction is blocked, a partial net exists, or a tool-constructed net passed the checks above; +- what question or decision the result is intended to support; +- whether the workpiece is sufficient for that purpose or partial with named gaps; +- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or tool-schema accepted; +- whether an agent-reviewed structural comparison occurred and what discrepancies remain; +- whether behavior was untested, observed in named simulations, or established to the stated scope by stronger analysis; - what the agent inferred, approximated, defaulted, simplified, or omitted; - what remains unknown, unasked, declined, deferred, conflicting, or unsupported; - what the target formalism or current tooling could not represent; - what smallest next evidence would change the result. -Do not convert these descriptions into a closed completion algebra. They are an honest account of observed state. +Do not collapse these levels into “validated,” “correct,” “runnable,” or “simulatable” without naming the evidence that supports that exact claim. Do not convert the delivery descriptions into a closed completion algebra. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md index 770b25d8e92..e34e6771379 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ Summarize status by reference to the authoritative account and issue ledger; do ### Net status -State whether no construction was attempted, construction is blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone. +State whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or tool-schema accepted; whether the inspected definition was structurally reviewed against the workpiece; and whether behavior was untested, observed in named simulations, or established to a stated scope by stronger analysis. Do not infer a higher level from a lower one. ``` ## Maintenance guidance diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md index be8b7db9b5c..b68bfdd5494 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md @@ -53,6 +53,6 @@ Construction may infer a representation from recorded operational knowledge; it ### Check and deliver -Apply the universal and plugin Verification registers before any delivery. Apply the phase-specific checks only when construction was prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in all cases. Deliver a net only when the available tool path has produced and checked one. Name what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target could not represent. +Apply the universal and plugin Verification registers before any delivery. Apply the phase-specific checks only when construction was prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in all cases. Deliver a net only when the available tool path has produced and inspected one, and report the highest evidence level reached: tool-schema acceptance, agent-reviewed structural correspondence, or behavior observed through a named execution or stronger analysis. Name what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target could not represent. -An explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the full latest workpiece and, if already available, the best checked net, with gaps and assumptions visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview. +An explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the full latest workpiece and, if already available, the latest inspected net with its evidence level, gaps, and assumptions visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md index a0ea4003213..efc540686b7 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ Not acceptable: - interpreting “unknown” as a textbook distribution; - treating a posted rule as practiced behavior; - inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; -- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without the corresponding tool evidence. +- collapsing tool-schema acceptance, agent-reviewed structural correspondence, and behavior observed through execution or stronger analysis into an unsupported claim that the net is valid, runnable, or simulated. ## Existing-net analysis and bounded change diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts.example b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts.example index 7a268fe5f10..9f4569407fb 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts.example +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts.example @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ import workpieceTemplate from "./workpiece-template.md?raw"; export const sdcpnModellingSkill = defineSkill({ name: "sdcpn-modelling", description: - "Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available.", + "Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct an inspected SDCPN with an explicit evidence level when Petrinaut capabilities are available.", instructions, files: { "references/checks.md": checks, diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md index bc416074866..f5b27c5bd13 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ Summarize status by reference to the authoritative account and issue ledger; do ### Net status -State whether no construction was attempted, construction is blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone. +State whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or tool-schema accepted; whether the inspected definition was structurally reviewed against the workpiece; and whether behavior was untested, observed in named simulations, or established to a stated scope by stronger analysis. Do not infer a higher level from a lower one. ``` ## Maintenance guidance From 3d89feed9d6181a47c7a806650667d758aa6388d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 15:37:43 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 028/101] Define the five-register draft evaluation protocol --- .../five-register-synthesis/EVALUATION.md | 233 ++++++++++++++++++ .../_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md | 35 +-- .../five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md | 1 + 3 files changed, 240 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/EVALUATION.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/EVALUATION.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/EVALUATION.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0c759f99300 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/EVALUATION.md @@ -0,0 +1,233 @@ +# Five-Register Synthesis Evaluation Protocol + +**Status: draft preregistration for owner review; no candidate has passed or won.** This protocol belongs to the non-authoritative workbench. It does not modify the frozen prospective v1 baseline or authorize a paid run. + +## Decision this protocol must produce + +Select one coherent relationship among plugin Coverage, workpiece organization, and SDCPN construction readiness. Then decide whether the deduplicated elicitation references exhibit enough observed attention or retrieval strain to earn finer progressive disclosure. + +This protocol can establish which candidate best satisfies the current Mission 4 contract under the cases and runs named here. It cannot establish a universally optimal interview structure or statistical superiority across domains, models, or target formalisms. + +## Candidates + +### A — domain-primary Coverage and workpiece + +Use `plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md` and `plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md` as currently authored. Target readiness remains distributed between the profile's Verification register and `checks.md`. + +### B — formalism-primary Coverage and workpiece + +Replace the profile's Coverage register with `plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary.md` and use `plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md`. All other authored material remains identical to A. + +### C — domain-primary elicitation plus a separate construction-readiness view + +Use domain-primary Coverage and a domain-primary workpiece, but remove formalism-completeness pressure from ordinary elicitation. At construction time, apply a separate SDCPN readiness view that references authoritative workpiece claims without reorganizing or duplicating them. This candidate is reserved before authoring so its evaluation criteria cannot be fitted to its eventual wording. + +## Shared invariants + +Every candidate uses the same: + +- core and plugin system prompts; +- universal progressive reference; +- lifecycle instructions and runtime branches; +- additive, register-pure plugin guidance outside the candidate-specific Coverage material; +- workpiece locality rule; +- construction guidance and three evidence levels; +- tool set, model configuration, case inputs, turn limits, graders, and stop rules within a comparison stage. + +If a candidate requires changing another listed invariant, stop: the comparison is confounded and needs a new protocol version. + +## Freeze and manifest + +Before any model-facing comparison: + +1. Give each candidate an immutable id and copy or render its complete model-facing instrument into a candidate-specific manifest. +2. Record the source commit and SHA-256 hash of every system prompt, skill instruction, progressive resource, template, case input, grader, and protocol file. +3. Record the packaged skill resource names and the built server artifact hash. +4. Refuse a paid run when a scoped instrument file is dirty. +5. Never overwrite an observed artifact. Mark invalid runs invalid and retain their evidence. + +Changing a frozen candidate or setting creates a new candidate id or protocol version. + +## Stage 1 — mechanical and authority audit + +Run this before judging prose quality. + +For each candidate, record: + +- total words in always-on instructions, activated skill instructions, mandatory elicitation references, conditionally read references, and workpiece template; +- packaged resource names and whether each instruction pointer resolves to an advertised `read_skill_resource` path; +- required register presence and order; +- exact duplicate sentences across universal and plugin references; +- operational propositions repeated in more than one authoritative workpiece location; +- centralized summaries that restate local claims; +- construction guidance visible before the construction branch; +- claims of reachability, conservation, exclusivity, validity, or simulation unsupported by the stated evidence level. + +A candidate fails this stage if a resource pointer is broken, a workpiece proposition has competing authoritative homes, construction mechanics enter ordinary elicitation, or a check claims a stronger oracle than the available method. + +## Stage 2 — owner-led paper walkthrough + +Walk every candidate through the same cases without rewriting candidate guidance during the comparison. + +### Cases + +1. **Reusable resource reservation and release:** two activities need the same limited crew; the crew is unavailable while held and returns either unchanged or with a consequential changed state. +2. **Failure, retry, and recovery:** an activity can fail, repeat only part of the process, and either retain or release occupied resources before retry. +3. **Contextual location:** a physical location may act as a boundary, eligibility condition, capacity, travel-time source, state distinction, resource, or irrelevant detail depending on the operation. +4. **External event versus internal threshold:** work may begin because something arrives from outside or because an evolving internal quantity crosses a threshold. +5. **Directional mode change:** A-to-B and B-to-A have different time, scrap, material, capacity, or sequencing losses. +6. **Hidden waiting:** a case waits because of policy, batching, calendar, transport, resource availability, approval, or recovery rather than because “queue” is an independently elicited object. +7. **Correction versus contextual coexistence:** a later account either replaces an earlier statement or reveals a condition under which both remain true. +8. **Unknown versus unasked:** the person explicitly does not know one value while a different consequential topic has never been raised. + +### Walkthrough trace + +For each case, produce one row containing: + +| Observation | Required record | +| --- | --- | +| Signal | What the profile's Recognition register notices without treating it as fact | +| Next move | Which Operation applies and why it is the smallest useful move | +| Coverage | Where the resulting operational knowledge belongs | +| Workpiece authority | The single location of the claim, its evidence, and epistemic treatment | +| Construction boundary | What remains hidden until construction | +| Readiness | How an SDCPN-relevant gap becomes visible and when | +| Verification | The observable failure and repair if the information is mishandled | +| Evidence level | What any resulting net claim may honestly say | + +Do not score a candidate from the elegance of its headings. Record the concrete navigation steps and any point at which the reviewer must translate the same fact twice, choose between competing homes, or introduce formalism vocabulary into the expert-facing move. + +## Stage 3 — model-facing candidate probes + +Run only candidates that pass Stages 1 and 2 and remain indistinguishable on the decision. Do not pay to run an alternative already eliminated by a structural discriminator. Obtain explicit owner authorization for the paid budget before starting. + +### Frozen diagnostic settings + +| Setting | Value | +| --- | --- | +| Case | `evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling` | +| Opening message | `evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/opening-message.md` | +| Simulated-expert pack | `evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/situation-pack.md` | +| Prospective ledger | `evaluations/oracles/vestera-scheduling/truth-ledger-v1-prospective.yaml` | +| Quality ruler | `evaluations/protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1` | +| Interviewer model | `claude-sonnet-4-5` | +| Simulated expert model | `claude-sonnet-4-5` | +| Interview turns | 8 before the final workpiece request | +| Per-logical-turn latency stop | 180,000 ms | +| Sampling | provider default; no seed | +| Diagnostic replications | 2 independent runs per remaining candidate | +| Omniscient grader | one fresh `claude-sonnet-4-5` context per run | +| Cold reviewer | a separate fresh `claude-sonnet-4-5` context per run | +| Output | a new immutable `docs/evidence/evaluations/five-register-candidate-comparison-v1/` location | + +The current production runner does not select a draft candidate manifest. Stage 3 is not executable until a versioned comparison runner can package one declared candidate without editing active sources between runs, records that candidate's exact manifest and built artifact hash, and passes the existing hermetic artifact/recovery checks. Do not compare candidates by manually swapping active files under one run id. + +Use a fresh conversation for every candidate/run and keep all shared invariants fixed. + +### Elicitation probes + +For each candidate, use the same opening request and simulated-expert input. Record: + +- first-turn question count and whether questions share one frame; +- occurrences of schema- or PN-shaped language in user-facing questions; +- which resources were read, in what order, and why; +- words or tokens loaded from each resource; +- whether each useful stretch updates a single authoritative workpiece claim; +- duplicate propositions across workpiece sections; +- target-relevant gaps identified before construction versus first discovered during construction; +- distinctions among unknown, unasked, declined, deferred, conflict, correction, and contextual coexistence; +- turn latency, model calls, tokens, and recorded cost. + +### Construction probes + +Use the same frozen workpiece input for each eligible candidate. Record separately: + +- tool-schema acceptance and rejected calls; +- agent-reviewed structural discrepancies against the workpiece; +- target gaps that block or materially alter construction; +- unsupported assumptions introduced during construction; +- whether resource acquisition/release, hidden waiting, directional losses, and contextual quantities are visibly represented; +- any actual simulation or stronger analysis, including its scenario and scope; +- the exact evidence level used in delivery claims. + +A parser-accepted or tool-schema-accepted definition is not behavioral success. An observed simulation trace is not a universal invariant. + +## Stage 4 — selected-candidate campaign against the frozen control + +Select one candidate through Stages 1–3 before running the Mission 4 campaign. Do not pay to campaign every lightly reasoned variant. + +Create a new versioned protocol/output location based on `evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v1/`. Preserve its case wall, grader separation, immutable manifests, artifact retention, and three-invocation campaign shape unless a separately accepted protocol decision changes one. Never write into `docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/`. + +For each valid selected-candidate run: + +1. Recover the full latest workpiece. +2. Run an independent omniscient grade with the frozen ruler and prospective ledger. +3. Run a separate cold review with only the opening request and workpiece. +4. Human-review every hard failure, grader disagreement, and new mistake class. +5. Record resource reads, loaded context, duplicate claims, target-gap timing, latency, tokens, cost, and evidence-level discipline alongside the frozen ruler outputs. + +Campaign adjudication reports ranges and individual vectors rather than collapsing baseline or candidate variation to one mean. + +## Observable comparison criteria + +### Hard gates + +A candidate is ineligible if it: + +- invents operational content or silently hardens evidence; +- collapses conflict, correction, or contextual coexistence; +- presents unasked material as person-declared unknown; +- interviews through workpiece or target-schema headings; +- creates competing authoritative workpiece claims; +- loads construction mechanics to frame ordinary elicitation; +- loses a reusable resource's reservation/release semantics or a directional/contextual distinction already present in the input; +- claims behavioral validity above the evidence level actually reached; +- fails to emit a recoverable latest workpiece. + +### Comparative observations + +Among gate-passing candidates, compare: + +- objective-aligned acquisition and smallest-next-question quality; +- cold reconstruction of the process spine and target-relevant distinctions; +- number and consequence of target gaps discovered only at construction; +- workpiece claim duplication and reader effort; +- schema-shaped questioning and formalism leakage; +- resource reads and loaded context cost; +- construction correspondence and explicit losses; +- honest separation of tool acceptance, structural review, and behavioral evidence. + +No one scalar decides the result. Context cost is a tie-breaker after fidelity, acquisition, workpiece authority, and evidence discipline. + +## Disposition rule + +1. Eliminate hard-gate failures and retain their artifacts. +2. Prefer the candidate that preserves operational language and single-home workpiece authority while exposing consequential target gaps no later than they are needed. +3. Treat differences inside the frozen baseline's observed variation as uncertain unless a structural discriminator explains them. +4. When candidates trade gains, record the owner-selected trade-off explicitly; do not manufacture a mean score to hide it. +5. If no candidate dominates on the mission imperative, retain the smallest reversible candidate and name the next discriminating probe. +6. After selection, remove losing alternatives from the candidate instrument. Preserve the comparison result as evidence rather than keeping several live prompt shapes. + +## Progressive-disclosure decision + +Do not split the universal reference or plugin profile because of word count alone. A split is earned when the deduplicated candidate shows one or more of these under the probes: + +- irrelevant sections are repeatedly loaded for branches that never use them; +- the model misses or contradicts guidance that is present but buried; +- conditional topics such as quantity distributions, rare events, or construction checks form clear branches with reliable pointers; +- a smaller directly named resource measurably reduces loaded context without delaying a load-bearing question or check. + +If no observed strain meets that bar, retain the shallower resource topology and close the disclosure concern without adding files. + +## Stop or reorient + +Stop the comparison if: + +- candidate instruments differ outside the declared Coverage/workpiece/readiness surface; +- a resource fails to package or its exact run instrument cannot be reconstructed; +- a grader uses information outside its allowed wall; +- the workpiece locality or evidence-level contract is ambiguous enough that reviewers cannot apply it consistently; +- a runtime failure prevents normal artifact retention; +- a proposed fix requires typed capture, completion, projection, or workflow machinery outside Mission 4. + +Repair the protocol or candidate at the owning boundary, assign a new version where required, and restart only the invalidated stage. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md index 83628b21927..dad5ede0c22 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ This candidate remaps the current core prompt, SDCPN prompt material, runbook sk 13. The plugin profile is strictly additive and register-pure: it states only operational-process or SDCPN consequences absent from universal teaching; Recognition names signals and hypotheses, Operations names moves, Coverage names what to preserve, and Verification names failures and repairs. Lifecycle and construction routing remain in instructions and checks. 14. A workpiece claim, its evidence, and its epistemic treatment share one authoritative location under the relevant concern. Only unresolved matters spanning concerns or requiring later re-entry enter a compact cross-cutting issue ledger, which references rather than restates claims. 15. Construction evidence is reported at one of three non-collapsible levels: tool-schema acceptance, agent-reviewed structural correspondence, and behavior observed through an actual execution or stronger analysis. Every claim stays within the scope of the method that produced it. +16. [`EVALUATION.md`](EVALUATION.md) owns the repeatable candidate comparison: frozen instruments, authority checks, owner-led walkthroughs, model-facing observables, campaign boundary, and disposition rules. ## Candidate topology @@ -28,6 +29,7 @@ This candidate remaps the current core prompt, SDCPN prompt material, runbook sk five-register-synthesis/ ├── README.md ├── SOURCE-MAP.md +├── EVALUATION.md ├── core/ │ ├── SYSTEM.md │ ├── flue.ts.example @@ -58,6 +60,7 @@ five-register-synthesis/ - [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md) is the recoverable process-model artifact, with operational claims, evidence, and epistemic treatment co-located and a reference-only cross-cutting issue ledger. - [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md) contains construction mappings and patterns disclosed only during construction. - [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md) separates tool-schema acceptance, agent-reviewed structural correspondence, and behavioral execution or stronger analysis before checking fidelity, revision, and delivery. +- [`EVALUATION.md`](EVALUATION.md) is the sole authority for comparing Coverage/workpiece/readiness candidates and deciding whether finer progressive disclosure is earned. ## How to read the synthesized set @@ -87,37 +90,11 @@ For construction and net delivery, additionally read: Workpiece-only delivery uses the universal and plugin Verification registers without disclosing construction resources. -## Coverage fog-line +## Evaluation -The profile uses a **domain-typology-primary Coverage index provisionally**, because a complete candidate is easier to evaluate than an abstract choice. This is not a settled design decision. +The profile currently uses a domain-typology-primary Coverage index provisionally. Do not decide between it and the alternatives from this README. Follow [`EVALUATION.md`](EVALUATION.md), which preregisters three candidates: domain-primary, formalism-primary, and domain-primary elicitation/workpiece organization plus a separate SDCPN construction-readiness view. -Compare two aligned profile/workpiece pairs: - -- **Domain-primary candidate:** [`profile.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md) with [`workpiece-template.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md); [`coverage-alternatives/domain-primary.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/domain-primary.md) isolates its Coverage register. -- **Formalism-primary candidate:** substitute [`coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary.md) and use its paired [`coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md). - -Walk the same cases through both: - -- a reusable resource that is acquired, unavailable while held, and released in a changed or unchanged state; -- a failure that retries part of a process and must release or retain occupied resources; -- a physical location whose relevance could be boundary, state, capacity, eligibility, travel, or no model distinction; -- an external event and an internal threshold that can both trigger work; -- a mode change whose loss differs by direction; -- hidden waiting caused by policy, batching, calendar, resource availability, or recovery. - -Evaluate which index lets a slice or sweep find Recognition and Coverage without turning the concepts into question order, losing target obligations, or requiring repeated many-to-many translation. - -## Under-structure check - -The five register headings are the only required entry structure. While reviewing, note concrete places where freeform entries make any of these hard: - -- determining whether text is binding, diagnostic, optional, a coverage concern, or a check; -- linking a Recognition signal to relevant Coverage without duplicating content; -- knowing when an Operation should stop or re-evaluate; -- distinguishing a failed check from its repair; -- finding the same concept reliably across universal and plugin layers. - -Only observed failures here would justify a repeated card grammar or machine-readable structure. +The protocol owns the shared invariants, mechanical audit, owner-led cases, model-facing observations, evidence walls, decision rule, and the threshold for splitting progressive resources. After a candidate wins, remove losing alternatives from the live candidate instrument and preserve only the comparison evidence. ## Observed runtime boundaries diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md index b18c61d7b9e..18e478ec528 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ This map accounts for the primary working and draft material used to produce the | `pn-construction.md` | SDCPN mappings, construction patterns, inference, bounded change, and losses | Active `pn-construction.md`; APPEND `Maps To` material; Ciaran transformation patterns | | `checks.md` | Phase-boundary, net, fidelity, revision, and delivery checks | Active `checks.md`; APPEND smells/rabbit holes/failure signatures; current construction tool contract | | `coverage-alternatives/*` | Concrete comparison at the unresolved Coverage-index fog-line | Active typology table; Ciaran headings; predecessor kind-indexed question reference | +| `EVALUATION.md` | Preregistered authority audit, owner-led walkthrough, model-facing comparison, campaign boundary, and disposition rule | Competing-design review; Mission 4 proof and fog-line; `prospective-runbook-v1`; `ir-quality-ruler-v1`; frozen baseline adjudication | ## Active core system prompt From 65085cbba456e59d1cbb9655978895c481648783 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 15:47:35 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 029/101] Generalize the Ampcode prompt architecture draft Add a software-behavior/Gherkin paper plugin, extract the cross-plugin transformation and evidence invariant, and capture the prospective software-correctness/Dafny boundary for mission planning. Amp-Thread-ID: https://ampcode.com/threads/T-01a05d1a-c858-722b-b53a-d0c448d14155 Co-authored-by: Amp --- libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md | 73 +++++++++ .../packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/README.md | 131 +++++++++++++-- .../core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md | 4 + .../ampcode/plugin-gherkin/APPEND_SYSTEM.md | 11 ++ .../gherkin-specification/SKILL.md | 52 ++++++ .../gherkin-authoring-and-checks.md | 95 +++++++++++ .../gherkin-elicitation.md | 153 ++++++++++++++++++ .../workpiece-template.md | 102 ++++++++++++ 8 files changed, 612 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin/APPEND_SYSTEM.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin/gherkin-specification/SKILL.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin/gherkin-specification/gherkin-authoring-and-checks.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin/gherkin-specification/gherkin-elicitation.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin/gherkin-specification/workpiece-template.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md index eb13a3e5eb7..366036112cd 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md @@ -742,6 +742,79 @@ Mission 3 locked one off-canvas PN JSON result, Petrinaut validation, manual loa The close decision is “runbook/workpiece path accepted; real-model semantic construction false.” Do not rewrite Mission 3 as if all original proof items passed. Its falsified construction route is now Mission 5's first boundary. +# Gherkin second-reference pressure test — paper design, not a mission + +The Ampcode prompt-architecture draft has now been tested against the intended second reference pairing: **software behavior as the reusable domain typology and Gherkin documents as the target formalism**. This is a non-authoritative paper design under `packages/core/_drafts/ampcode`; it does not promote Gherkin into the production app composition or change the current SDCPN-only route. + +The local `packages/plugin-gherkin/plugin.yaml` is evidence of the intended content territory—feature, rule, example, step, software-behavior guidance, and proposal language—but not of a working prompt/skill architecture. It remains attached to the inactive generalized YAML machinery, its TypeScript package exports only a verbatim proposal, and no Flue skill, Gherkin parser, step-definition index, binding check, or execution path is currently wired. The historical worked IR examples are the stronger guide at one disputed boundary: behavior is recorded in the person's language and target projection may factor one case into steps; elicitation must not require a mandatory step-kind decomposition merely because Gherkin is the destination. + +The generalization survives at the level of responsibilities: + +- Three disclosure layers remain useful: a concise always-on core plus plugin append, one activated lifecycle skill, and resources read when their role becomes active. +- Core owns universal epistemic conduct and interviewing moves; the plugin owns only the consequences of software behavior and Gherkin. The five additive registers—Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification—accept those additions without becoming a lifecycle or schema. +- Prompting and recognition remain Brunch-owned; Gherkin's grammar and semantics must come from its authoritative formalism source; Flue remains the only packaging mechanism. +- Elicitation, recording, target authoring, and checking remain distinct semantic roles. Honest output still requires a recoverable account of person evidence, agent proposals, current-versus-proposed behavior, conflict, deferral, open matters, and capability limits. +- Parse validity, step-definition binding, runtime executability, and behavioral adequacy are separate claims. A plugin must report only the checks it actually ran. + +The exact SDCPN topology does not generalize. File count, phase count, and a terminal tool-mediated construction branch are consequences of that formalism's distance and lossiness, not core architecture. Gherkin projection is textual and near the behavior account, so authoring may serve as a correction surface after one coherent rule/example rather than waiting for a terminal construction phase. It still needs a companion workpiece while authorship, uncertainty, or unresolved behavior remains consequential; hiding that material in comments would only create a worse sidecar inside the target. + +Three shapes were compared: + +- **A — Mirror SDCPN exactly:** separate behavior workpiece, construction phase, construction resource, and checks. Rejected as overfitting a distant, tool-mediated formalism to a low-distance textual projection. +- **B — Use `.feature` as both workpiece and target:** rejected because polished Gherkin cannot honestly preserve unsupported rules, agent authorship, current-versus-proposed status, conflicts, deferrals, and unchecked bindings without contaminating comments with a hidden second artifact. +- **C — Keep a lightweight near-target behavior workpiece and combine Gherkin authoring with checks:** selected as the current paper-design hypothesis. The workpiece stores feature purpose, rules, concrete context/event-or-action/outcome examples, domain terms, status, authorship, and open matters without requiring `Given`/`When`/`Then`. The skill may draft target text as a correction surface, while one combined resource owns document structure, grammar semantics, factoring, parse checks, binding honesty, revision, and delivery. + +A read-only Oracle review independently selected Shape C for the same invariant: the workpiece should carry only the epistemic delta that Gherkin cannot. Its agreement is design advice, not runtime evidence. It also sharpened the reversal conditions: repeated authorship laundering would justify a workpiece less shaped like the target; repeated zero-delta transcription would justify collapsing toward target text plus a minimal open-matters companion; a real codebase step-binding capability could earn a separately disclosed checking phase. + +Fog remains empirical. Early target drafting may improve correction, or it may anchor people to agent wording; no Gherkin run has tested that trade-off. The compact append → skill → resource route has not been exercised for this plugin. No parser or step corpus exists locally to support parse or binding claims. A future tracer should first wire the smallest real software-behavior/Gherkin path through Flue, observe whether required resources are actually read, preserve authoring provenance, and distinguish authored-only output from parser, binding, and execution evidence before deepening this paper topology. + +# Dafny third-reference pressure test — verification intent, formalization, and proof + +The article [“From Intent to Proof: Dafny Verification for Web Apps”](http://midspiral.com/blog/from-intent-to-proof-dafny-verification-for-web-apps/) exposes a third plugin pairing and a program-level concern: whether Brunch can help people identify valuable formal-verification use cases, state what they intend to guarantee, and specify exactly how that intent should become a checkable proof obligation. This remains design capture, not a production route or a decision to make Brunch generate verified implementations. + +The umbrella concern **formal-verification use cases** is not itself a valid Brunch plugin boundary. It names neither one reusable subject-matter typology nor one target formalism. The current candidate pairing is: + +- **Domain typology: software correctness obligations.** Reusable ways to recognize and investigate claims about values, states, operations, representations, histories, refinement, termination, authority, and trusted boundaries. +- **Target formalism: Dafny specification modules and program contracts.** Dafny types, predicates, preconditions, postconditions, frame and termination clauses, abstract interfaces, and lemma statements whose actual proof status can be checked by the Dafny verifier. + +Two alternatives lose at this boundary. **Verified state evolution × Dafny kernel/domain contracts** overfits the article's state/action presentation and would miss correctness obligations that are functional, representational, refinement-based, boundary-facing, or otherwise not state-transition shaped. **Formal-verification brief × no selected prover** is target-neutral and therefore not a plugin under the paired-unit contract; its useful content survives as the workpiece and as plugin-selection activity above any one plugin. + +The source repository sharpens the distinction between a reusable typology and one project's contract. It has no uniform `Model`/`Action`/`Inv`/`Valid`/`Apply` interface. Replay uses `Init`, `Inv`, `Apply`, and `Normalize` plus initialization and preservation lemmas; Authority uses partial `TryStep`; MultiCollaboration adds `Rebase`, `Candidates`, `Explains`, and `CandidatesComplete`. A kernel interface is therefore supplied project context to inspect and satisfy, not ontology to bake into a plugin. Those names remain useful recognition examples, never required elicitation decomposition. + +The article's headline invariant argument also requires qualification. Transition preservation establishes reachable-state safety only when initialization establishes the invariant, and it establishes only the property expressed by that invariant. The non-negative counter invariant does not detect the stale-redo bug because the wrong historical state can still satisfy `n ≥ 0`; the replay source separately proves that a new `Do` clears the future and proves undo/redo laws. The plugin must therefore recognize more than state invariants: + +- initialization and representation invariants; +- function and operation preconditions, postconditions, and frame conditions; +- transition preservation, rejection behavior, and unchanged-on-failure guarantees; +- history, trace, round-trip, determinism, and idempotence laws; +- abstraction, refinement, simulation, normalization, and intent-preservation relations; +- termination and progress obligations where Dafny and the intended scope can express them; and +- assumptions and trusted boundaries whose failure sits outside the proved claim. + +This is a recognition repertoire, not a closed property-kind schema. The person states what failure would matter and what should be true in their language. Formalization chooses the mathematical objects, quantification, domains, predicates, and obligation shape only after that intent is recoverable. A familiar property family may suggest a question or candidate encoding; it must not manufacture a requirement. + +The Ampcode architecture survives at the role level: concise core plus plugin append, one activated skill, additive five-register teaching, a recoverable workpiece, target-formalism guidance, and capability-aware checks. Dafny does not inherit Gherkin's combined authoring/checking shape. Formalization is semantic, high-stakes, and tool-mediated, and a passing verifier can create more false confidence than parse acceptance; separate Dafny authoring and proof-evidence resources are therefore plausible if a tracer earns them. File and phase cardinality remain plugin consequences rather than core law. + +Three distinctions are non-negotiable across the workpiece, target projection, and delivery: + +1. **Intent ≠ formalization ≠ proof.** What the person wants to be true, how the agent encoded it, and what Dafny verified are separately attributable. A verified `Explains` predicate proves consequences of its authored definition, not that the definition captures human intent. +2. **Stated ≠ assumed ≠ discharged ≠ trusted.** A lemma signature states an obligation; `assume` or `{:axiom}` removes an obligation by trust; a verifier result for the exact source discharges what it actually checked; an external boundary remains trusted or out of scope. None may silently become another. +3. **Verified source ≠ compiled artifact ≠ integrated system.** The examined repository verifies and translates in separate commands, translation may use `--no-verify`, some CI paths are skipped, and JavaScript marshalling, wrappers, UI dispatch, authentication, persistence, concurrency, compiler/runtime correctness, and deployment remain outside many theorems. Every claim names its source artifact, tool/version, assumptions, skipped material, and trusted perimeter. + +A fourth check follows from those distinctions: preconditions, admissibility predicates, abstraction functions, and candidate relations can make a theorem vacuous or weaker than the person's intent. The elicitor must ask what inputs or states the guarantee is allowed to exclude, seek a witness and nearby counterexample, and surface every formalization move that weakens, strengthens, normalizes, or reinterprets the original claim. Proof search may propose such a change; it may never edit the authoritative specification silently to obtain green verification. + +A plausible single-skill lifecycle is: orient to the decision and cost of failure; identify one candidate correctness claim and its verification envelope; elicit concrete satisfying and violating cases; maintain an intent/formalization/evidence workpiece; inspect any supplied kernel or code contract; author or revise a Dafny specification module; show a semantic diff back to the person; run syntax, resolution, verification, and compilation checks only when those capabilities exist; and deliver the exact claim ladder and trust boundary. Render-only and verify-only branches consume a supplied workpiece or exact target artifact without reopening an interview. + +The minimum target artifact is a **Dafny specification module**, not a full implementation or completed proof: types or abstract types, specification predicates, function or method signatures, `requires`/`ensures`/`reads`/`modifies`/`decreases` clauses where relevant, and named lemma statements. An abstract module may make the contract checkable while remaining non-compilable. Missing proof bodies and axiom-backed declarations remain visibly stated or assumed, never proved. A companion obligation manifest maps each person-recognizable claim to its Dafny declaration, formalization choices, current evidence status, and trusted dependencies. + +The workpiece carries the epistemic delta the Dafny source cannot honestly settle by itself: purpose and verification economics; the failure or harm to prevent; intended claim in the person's language; concrete witnesses, counterexamples, and boundary cases; relevant state, operations, inputs, outputs, histories, and observations; current implementation or kernel context; assumptions and environmental dependencies; proposed formalization with authorship; strengthening or weakening deltas; obligation and tool status; and the unverified integration perimeter. It should also permit the honest conclusion that the candidate is not presently worth or suited to Dafny verification because the behavior is unresolved, the property is primarily empirical or performance-based, the integration boundary dominates, or proof cost exceeds the consequence. + +A read-only Oracle review independently selected this pairing over the state-evolution and target-neutral alternatives. Its strongest reversal evidence is operational. Multiple independent Dafny projects converging on one stable state/action contract could justify a narrower state-evolution plugin. Repeated real conversations in which Dafny-shaped recognition anchors people away from a clearly better target such as temporal model checking or property-based testing would justify a target-selection stage above plugin activation. Until either appears, kernel shape is input, prover selection is upstream, and the plugin owns software-correctness elicitation plus honest Dafny projection. + +Fog remains before a tracer: whether formal contract text helps people correct intent or anchors them to agent-authored mathematics; whether a Dafny abstract module plus obligation manifest is the smallest useful target; how a semantic diff can expose quantifier, domain, precondition, and trust-boundary changes without demanding formal-methods fluency; and whether use-case triage can remain additive to universal elicitation rather than becoming a generic consulting interview. The first real proof should be one narrow correctness claim in an existing codebase, its exact Dafny contract, one verifier run, and a human decision on whether the intent/formalization/proof separation stayed legible. + +The Ampcode paper prototype now carries this conclusion at the design boundary without pretending the Dafny plugin is specified: `core/SYSTEM.md` owns the universal source-intent → recoverable-account → target-transformation → check-evidence → surrounding-system claim separation, while `README.md` records the prospective pairing, disclosure shape, property-family repertoire, claim ladder, and reversal evidence. No Dafny plugin resource files or production wiring were added. + # Standing decisions Not missions. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/README.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/README.md index 1fa2c3a8b71..f1b9f1f14be 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/README.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/README.md @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ This directory is a non-authoritative paper prototype. It proposes a content and Two independent structures are needed: 1. **Disclosure layers** determine when guidance becomes available: always-on prompt, activated skill instructions, then phase-scoped resources. -2. **Semantic roles** determine what guidance does: procedure, model content, recognition, interviewing operations, workpiece recording, diagnostics, construction, and completion checks. +2. **Semantic roles** determine what guidance does: procedure, model content, recognition, interviewing operations, workpiece recording, diagnostics, target authoring or construction, and completion checks. A plugin may combine adjacent roles when separating them would add no useful disclosure boundary. The five shared registers—**Directives**, **Recognition**, **Operations**, **Coverage**, and **Verification**—organize universal and plugin elicitation guidance. They are an additive authoring contract, not a lifecycle, workpiece schema, or reason to place every kind of guidance in one document. @@ -19,6 +19,13 @@ ampcode/ ├── core/ │ ├── SYSTEM.md │ └── universal-elicitation.md +├── plugin-gherkin/ +│ ├── APPEND_SYSTEM.md +│ └── gherkin-specification/ +│ ├── SKILL.md +│ ├── gherkin-elicitation.md +│ ├── workpiece-template.md +│ └── gherkin-authoring-and-checks.md └── plugin-sdcpn/ ├── APPEND_SYSTEM.md └── sdcpn-modelling/ @@ -29,7 +36,7 @@ ampcode/ └── checks.md ``` -Core owns universal elicitation. The plugin owns the operational-process and SDCPN specialization. The workpiece and target construction remain distinct from the model-content contract. +Core owns universal elicitation. Each plugin owns one domain-typology and target-formalism specialization. The recording contract and target-authoring responsibilities remain distinct from elicitation content even when a thin plugin combines their resources or phases. ## Runtime disclosure @@ -49,6 +56,23 @@ On `sdcpn-modelling` activation └── checks.md ``` +For the software-behavior/Gherkin pairing, the same disclosure architecture produces a thinner runtime shape: + +```text +Always present +├── core/SYSTEM.md +└── plugin-gherkin/APPEND_SYSTEM.md + +On `gherkin-specification` activation +└── SKILL.md + ├── elicitation and workpiece maintenance + │ ├── universal-elicitation.md + │ ├── gherkin-elicitation.md + │ └── workpiece-template.md when recording or revising + └── authoring, review, and delivery + └── gherkin-authoring-and-checks.md +``` + The resource names in `SKILL.md` are logical addresses in one assembled Flue skill. In production, the plugin would use Flue's native `defineSkill()` to package the core-authored universal reference and plugin-authored resources under those safe skill-local names. They are not repository-relative Markdown links, and no resource relies on another resource being traversed automatically. ## Channel boundary @@ -58,14 +82,36 @@ The resource names in `SKILL.md` are logical addresses in one assembled Flue ski | Core `SYSTEM.md` | A universal invariant whose absence could already cause a wrong first turn or dishonest result | | Plugin `APPEND_SYSTEM.md` | A specialization, activation rule, or plugin-specific guard needed before skill activation | | `SKILL.md` | Mandatory procedure, branch selection, phase transition, or resource-reading decision | -| Elicitation references | Detailed teaching used while interviewing or revising the process account | +| Elicitation references | Detailed teaching used while interviewing or revising the domain account | | Workpiece template | How supported, inferred, unsettled, corrected, and omitted material is recorded | -| Construction reference | How recorded operational meaning may be represented in an SDCPN | -| Checks | Whether the workpiece-to-construction boundary, resulting net, and delivery are honest | +| Target authoring or construction reference | How recorded domain meaning may be represented in the selected formalism | +| Checks | Whether the workpiece-to-target boundary, resulting artifact, and delivery are honest | If a rule must bind before a lazy resource might be read, it does not belong only in that resource. If material merely teaches how to carry out one phase, it does not earn always-on prompt space. -Resources read together must be additive: when the universal and plugin elicitation references state the same rule, core owns it and the plugin retains only the operational-process or target-formalism consequence. Resources read at different moments may project a universal invariant into a local recording or checking obligation. +Resources read together must be additive: when the universal and plugin elicitation references state the same rule, core owns it and the plugin retains only the domain-typology or target-formalism consequence. Resources read at different moments may project a universal invariant into a local recording or checking obligation. + +These channels are responsibility tests, not a required file count. SDCPN earns separate construction and checking resources because transformation is distant, lossy, tool-mediated, and sometimes construct-only. Gherkin combines authoring and checks because its projection is textual and near the elicited behavior, while retaining a separate workpiece for authorship, uncertainty, and unresolved material that a `.feature` document cannot honestly carry by itself. + +## Cross-plugin transformation invariant + +Three references now support one universal boundary: + +```text +person's intent and evidence +→ recoverable workpiece account +→ target-formalism transformation +→ evidence from named checks +→ claim about a surrounding system +``` + +These arrows are transformations and trust boundaries, not implications. Each stage preserves the source, attributes agent-authored choices, and reports strengthening, weakening, normalization, omission, approximation, assumptions, and losses that could change meaning. Evidence at one stage establishes only its named claim over the exact artifact and assumptions examined there. + +- An SDCPN parser or simulation does not establish that the net preserves the operational account or covers every relevant execution. +- A Gherkin parser does not establish step binding, execution, or behavioral adequacy. +- A Dafny verifier does not establish that agent-authored predicates capture the person's intent, that translated code is the verified source, or that surrounding integration is correct. + +This invariant belongs in `core/SYSTEM.md` because a missing lazy read must not permit an overclaim. Each plugin owns the target-specific claim ladder, checks, and trust boundary that instantiate it. ## Shared elicitation registers @@ -75,7 +121,7 @@ Resources read together must be additive: when the universal and plugin elicitat - **Coverage** names information the resulting account may need for its purpose; it is not question order. - **Verification** checks the current question, account, or interviewing trajectory and names local repairs. -The core reference defines universal entries. The SDCPN reference contributes only operational-process or target-specific additions. Plugin silence leaves the universal guidance in force; plugin additions may narrow applicability but may not silently weaken universal directives. +The core reference defines universal entries. Each plugin reference contributes only domain-typology or target-formalism additions. Plugin silence leaves the universal guidance in force; plugin additions may narrow applicability but may not silently weaken universal directives. ## Responsibility map @@ -90,6 +136,18 @@ The core reference defines universal entries. The SDCPN reference contributes on | Petri-net mappings and construction patterns | `pn-construction.md` | | Construction readiness, net fidelity, and delivery | `checks.md` | +The Gherkin sibling instantiates the same responsibilities with lower cardinality: + +| Responsibility | Owner | +| --- | --- | +| Universal identity and non-negotiable epistemic conduct | `core/SYSTEM.md` | +| Detailed general elicitation repertoire | `core/universal-elicitation.md` | +| Software-behavior/Gherkin specialization and pre-activation guardrails | `plugin-gherkin/APPEND_SYSTEM.md` | +| Lifecycle, progressive routing, and render-only behavior | `gherkin-specification/SKILL.md` | +| Software-behavior recognition, investigation, coverage, and diagnostics | `gherkin-elicitation.md` | +| Near-target behavior account, authorship, and open matters | `workpiece-template.md` | +| Gherkin authoring, parse semantics, binding honesty, and delivery checks | `gherkin-authoring-and-checks.md` | + ## Main relocations from the first Ampcode candidate - Detailed procedure, movements, probes, licenses, and universal diagnostics leave `SYSTEM.md` for `universal-elicitation.md`. @@ -99,13 +157,61 @@ The core reference defines universal entries. The SDCPN reference contributes on - Construct-only behavior is treated as a runtime branch, not an unconditional plugin instruction. - Closed stopping-outcome codes are replaced by a plain account of what was produced, checked, blocked, assumed, or left open. +## Gherkin pressure-test verdict + +The generalization holds at the disclosure, ownership, and semantic-role boundaries. It does not hold as an exact SDCPN-shaped directory or phase graph. + +- The five registers accept the software-behavior additions without a sixth register: rules and examples are Recognition and Coverage concerns; concretizing, contrasting, and varying one condition are Operations; behavior and target checks are Verification. Lifecycle remains in `SKILL.md`, outside the registers. +- Core owns the generic move; the plugin owns its consequence. For example, core owns concrete-case slicing and observable clarification, while Gherkin adds the context/event/outcome shape and the requirement that an expected result be externally observable. +- The workpiece remains distinct from the target artifact. A `.feature` document cannot by itself preserve proposed-versus-current behavior, agent authorship, unsupported step bindings, conflict, deferral, or consequential open questions without becoming a disguised sidecar in comments. +- Gherkin authoring is not an SDCPN-style construction phase. Drafting a scenario is a low-distance projection and a correction surface. It may happen after a coherent rule/example account rather than only in a terminal phase. +- The elicitation workpiece should not require the person to decompose behavior into `Given`/`When`/`Then` steps. It records one example as context, event or action, and observable outcome in their vocabulary; target authoring factors that account into step lines. Literal Gherkin supplied by a knowledgeable person may be preserved without making target syntax the interview's required vocabulary. +- Parse validity, step-definition binding, and behavioral adequacy are different claims. The plugin may claim only the checks it actually ran; absent a supplied step lexicon or codebase capability, phrases are marked new or unchecked rather than guessed to be bound. + +The evidence that would re-open this result is operational: repeated authorship laundering would justify a workpiece less shaped like Gherkin; repeated no-delta transcription would justify collapsing more of the workpiece into the target plus a minimal open-matters companion; a real step-definition corpus and machine binding check could earn a separately disclosed checking phase. + +## Prospective Dafny third reference + +No Dafny plugin files are authored in this prototype. The third reference currently establishes a pairing and prospective responsibility shape for Oracle review rather than an implementation specification: + +- **Domain typology:** software correctness obligations. +- **Target formalism:** Dafny specification modules and program contracts. + +“Formal-verification use cases” remains the umbrella program concern and possible plugin-selection activity, not a target-neutral plugin. “Verified state evolution” remains one recurring correctness shape, not the typology boundary. Actual kernel interfaces are supplied project context: even the examined `dafny-replay` repository varies between `Apply` plus `Normalize`, partial `TryStep`, and collaboration obligations such as `Rebase`, `Candidates`, `Explains`, and `CandidatesComplete`. + +A prospective disclosure shape is: + +```text +Always present +├── core/SYSTEM.md +└── plugin-dafny/APPEND_SYSTEM.md + +On `dafny-verification` activation +└── SKILL.md + ├── elicitation and workpiece maintenance + │ ├── universal-elicitation.md + │ ├── software-correctness-elicitation.md + │ └── workpiece-template.md when recording or revising + └── formalization and evidence + ├── dafny-specification.md + └── proof-checks.md +``` + +The separate Dafny formalization and evidence roles are provisional but earned enough to review: formalization can materially change quantification, domains, preconditions, abstraction functions, and trusted assumptions, while verifier success can create false confidence about those choices. Unlike Gherkin's low-distance textual projection, this boundary needs an explicit semantic diff and an exact account of what was stated, assumed or axiomatized, discharged, skipped, or trusted. + +The software-correctness profile would treat initialization and representation invariants; operation preconditions, postconditions, and frame conditions; transition and rejection guarantees; history and round-trip laws; refinement, simulation, normalization, and intent-preservation relations; termination and progress; and trusted boundaries as a **recognition repertoire, not a closed property-kind schema or interview order**. The person supplies the consequential failure and intended guarantee; the plugin proposes a formal property family only for correction. + +The minimum prospective target is a Dafny specification module plus an obligation manifest, not a full implementation or completed proof. The workpiece preserves the person-recognizable claim, examples and counterexamples, formalization choices and authorship, assumptions and exclusions, semantic deltas, proof status, and unverified perimeter. The manifest maps that account to exact Dafny declarations and distinguishes stated, assumed, discharged, skipped, and trusted obligations. Abstract or bodyless declarations may make contracts available to verification without proving their implementations and must never be reported as discharged merely because dependent code verifies. + +This design would reverse toward a narrower state-evolution plugin only after multiple independent Dafny projects expose one stable cross-project contract. Repeated real conversations in which Dafny-shaped recognition anchors people away from a clearly better target would instead earn a target-selection stage above plugin activation. Until a tracer observes either strain, no target-neutral plugin, fixed kernel ontology, or full Dafny prompt package is warranted. + ## Material retained from Ciaran's outline -The plugin Coverage register retains goals and avoidance conditions; triggers and prerequisites; participants, locations, and resources; activities and input-use semantics; process flow, failures, retries, and recovery; and quantities and validation. It also makes retry scope, data bindings, spatial transfer, goal trade-offs, tolerated probabilities, and one-logical-step-to-several-net-elements explicit. +The SDCPN plugin Coverage register retains goals and avoidance conditions; triggers and prerequisites; participants, locations, and resources; activities and input-use semantics; process flow, failures, retries, and recovery; and quantities and validation. It also makes retry scope, data bindings, spatial transfer, goal trade-offs, tolerated probabilities, and one-logical-step-to-several-net-elements explicit. ## Non-goals -This prototype does not define a machine-readable register schema, typed capture store, completion algebra, renderer, document loader, second agent, or automatic link traversal. It does not prove that the wording outperforms the frozen baseline or change the current Flue composition. +This prototype does not define a machine-readable register schema, typed capture store, completion algebra, renderer, document loader, second agent, or automatic link traversal. It does not author the prospective Dafny plugin, select a verifier integration, prove that the wording outperforms the frozen baseline, or change the current Flue composition. ## Primary sources @@ -113,4 +219,11 @@ This prototype does not define a machine-readable register schema, typed capture - [`../../../plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md`](../../../plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md) - [`../system-prompts/ciaran-eliciting-and-constructing.md`](../system-prompts/ciaran-eliciting-and-constructing.md) - [`../../../plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/`](../../../plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/) +- [`../../../plugin-gherkin/plugin.yaml`](../../../plugin-gherkin/plugin.yaml) +- [Cucumber Gherkin reference](https://cucumber.io/docs/gherkin/reference) +- [From Intent to Proof: Dafny Verification for Web Apps](http://midspiral.com/blog/from-intent-to-proof-dafny-verification-for-web-apps/) +- [`dafny-replay` Replay kernel](https://github.com/metareflection/dafny-replay/blob/main/kernels/Replay.dfy) +- [`dafny-replay` MultiCollaboration kernel](https://github.com/metareflection/dafny-replay/blob/main/kernels/MultiCollaboration.dfy) +- [`dafny-replay` guarantee boundary](https://github.com/metareflection/dafny-replay/blob/main/GUARANTEES.md) +- [Dafny reference manual](https://dafny.org/latest/DafnyRef/DafnyRef) - [`../five-register-synthesis/`](../five-register-synthesis/) diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md index 284986ff809..6c8049566df 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md @@ -14,6 +14,10 @@ Use the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a s Keep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them. +## Target transformation and evidence + +Keep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct. + ## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery Maintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin/APPEND_SYSTEM.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin/APPEND_SYSTEM.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8becfbf2f1c --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin/APPEND_SYSTEM.md @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +# Software Behavior Specification in Gherkin + +Specialize the universal elicitation role to software behavior represented as Gherkin feature documents. Help a person make intended or current behavior explicit as purpose-bearing rules and concrete examples, maintain an evidence-faithful behavior workpiece, and author or revise Gherkin that the person would recognize. + +Activate the `gherkin-specification` skill before substantive interviewing, workpiece revision, Gherkin authoring, or review. + +During elicitation, speak about the software in the person's vocabulary—situations, events, actions, rules, and observable outcomes—rather than requiring `Feature`, `Rule`, `Background`, `Scenario`, `Given`, `When`, or `Then` phrasing. Keep current behavior distinct from proposed behavior. Target syntax may organize a draft; it must not supply behavior the person did not establish. + +The behavior workpiece is the recoverable source for authoring whenever authorship, conflict, uncertainty, or open matters remain. Do not treat a polished `.feature` document as evidence that those matters are resolved. + +Do not claim a document is parse-valid without parser evidence. Do not claim its steps bind to existing step definitions without an available step lexicon or codebase check, and do not call it executable merely because it parses. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin/gherkin-specification/SKILL.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin/gherkin-specification/SKILL.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6f393b08e27 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin/gherkin-specification/SKILL.md @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ +--- +name: gherkin-specification +description: Elicit or revise software behavior, maintain a recoverable behavior workpiece, and author or review honest Gherkin feature documents. Use for a behavior-specification interview, Gherkin document, executable-specification draft, or review of any of them. +--- + +# Capability-aware specification lifecycle + +Use one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise behavior, maintain the workpiece, author or revise Gherkin when useful, check, and deliver. Authoring is a thin projection and correction surface, not a separate modelling world. The current conversation may expose only part of the lifecycle; do not claim an unavailable check occurred. + +## Select the runtime branch + +### Interactive elicitation or revision + +Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `gherkin-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Interview in the person's software and product vocabulary. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the behavior account. Read `gherkin-authoring-and-checks.md` before drafting, reviewing, or delivering target text. + +An early Gherkin draft may be offered after one coherent rule and example are understood when seeing the wording will help correction. Mark the wording as your rendering; agreement with it does not retroactively make every phrase person-originated evidence. + +### Render or check only + +Use the supplied behavior workpiece or Gherkin document as the complete input. Do not interview. Read `gherkin-authoring-and-checks.md`, preserve unaffected material, and perform only the checks the available capabilities support. If a consequential ambiguity prevents faithful authoring or review, report it and the smallest question a later interactive conversation must answer rather than inventing the behavior. + +## Procedure + +### Orient + +Establish enough purpose and context to select one useful behavior thread: who needs the capability, what it enables, whether the account is current or proposed, the relevant software boundary, the intended readers, and whether an existing feature document or step vocabulary is available. Do not administer these concerns as an opening form. + +### Elicit or revise behavior + +For a new account, follow one concrete example through its starting context, one focal event or action, and observable outcome. Use contrasts and boundary cases to expose the rule it illustrates. For an existing account, first locate the disputed rule, example, or feature narrative and the behavior it changes. Use both elicitation references without turning their registers or the workpiece headings into question order. + +### Maintain the workpiece + +Keep a near-target behavior account in the person's vocabulary. Record feature purpose, rules, examples, domain terms, current-versus-proposed status, authorship, and consequential open matters. A target-shaped draft does not replace these distinctions while they remain load-bearing. + +Whenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before render-only handoff and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or a `.feature` document without its open matters is not the full recoverable account. + +### Author or revise Gherkin + +Read `gherkin-authoring-and-checks.md`. Translate only settled workpiece meaning into target structure. Preserve team language, localization, aliases, tags, and suite conventions when supplied. Do not invent step-definition bindings or implementation detail to make the document look executable. + +For revision, preserve unaffected features, rules, examples, descriptions, comments, tags, and phrasing unless the changed behavior or a named check requires a delta. + +### Check and deliver + +Apply the checks supported by the current capabilities. Deliver the current behavior workpiece when open matters or authorship distinctions remain material. Deliver Gherkin text with a plain account of whether it was only authored, parsed, checked against a supplied step vocabulary, or actually executed elsewhere. Name unillustrated rules, ambiguous behavior, new or unchecked step phrases, assumptions, and omitted cases. + +An explicit stop opens no new topic. Return the best useful workpiece and target draft with consequential gaps visible. + +## Resource discipline + +Read resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or use target grammar as the sequence or vocabulary of ordinary interview questions. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin/gherkin-specification/gherkin-authoring-and-checks.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin/gherkin-specification/gherkin-authoring-and-checks.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..74d081c25fc --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin/gherkin-specification/gherkin-authoring-and-checks.md @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ +# Gherkin Authoring and Checks + +Read this when drafting, revising, reviewing, or delivering Gherkin. Consume the current behavior workpiece or supplied feature document; do not reread the transcript as the primary behavior model. + +Authoring translates recorded software behavior into Gherkin structure. It may normalize wording, factor repeated setup, or choose an equivalent keyword alias. It may not invent behavior, step bindings, tags, examples, or suite conventions to make the document look complete. + +The [Cucumber Gherkin reference](https://cucumber.io/docs/gherkin/reference) is the public semantic authority for this draft. An installed parser and its version are the authority for a concrete project's syntax acceptance; this resource routes and interprets checks rather than replacing either source. + +## Authoring boundary + +Before authoring, confirm that the feature purpose is intelligible and each target example has a usable starting context, focal event or action, and observable outcome. If materially different behaviors remain possible because one distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in render-only execution, report it and stop the unsupported rendering path. + +Honor the person's spoken language and supplied team conventions. If the document uses a non-English Gherkin locale, put the appropriate `# language: ` header on the first line. Otherwise English is the default. Do not translate the domain language merely to fit an assumed suite convention. + +## Document structure + +- Emit one `Feature:` per `.feature` document. Give it a short name and a description that preserves the capability's purpose and value when useful. +- Use `Rule:` only when it expresses a genuine business rule and groups examples that illustrate that rule. Gherkin permits examples directly under a feature; do not manufacture a rule solely to fill structure. +- Use `Scenario:` or its `Example:` synonym consistently with supplied team convention. Each example should tell one concise behavior story; Cucumber recommends three to five steps, but semantic clarity—not a step-count gate—decides when to split. +- Map supported starting context to `Given`, the focal event or action to `When`, and externally observable results to `Then`. Use `And` and `But` to continue the preceding semantic role. Do not use the keyword to disguise a second unrelated action or outcome. +- Keep implementation detail out of steps unless the interface or protocol is itself the behavior contract. Prefer the actor's goal and externally visible messages, reports, state, or responses over clicks, selectors, functions, and database inspection. +- A step's keyword is not part of Cucumber's definition match. Do not author identical step text under different semantic keywords as though they were distinct definitions. + +## Factoring and data + +### Background + +Use `Background:` only for context shared by every following example at the same `Feature` or `Rule` level. It runs before each example, after before hooks. Keep it short and vivid; the Cucumber reference recommends no more than four lines before considering higher-level phrasing or another grouping. Do not move behavior essential to understanding an example out of sight merely to remove repetition. + +Only one `Background` is allowed per `Feature` or `Rule`. Different setup families usually indicate separate rules, features, or explicit context in each example. + +### Scenario Outline and Examples + +Use `Scenario Outline:` when the same behavior structure is supported for several explicit value combinations. Every `` must name an `Examples:` table header, and the outline must have at least one data row. Do not turn materially different rules into one table merely because their sentences are similar. + +Parameters may appear in step text, descriptions, Doc Strings, and Data Tables. Preserve cell values exactly enough to discriminate the supported examples. + +### Step arguments + +Use a Data Table when one supported step consumes a list or record-shaped value, not as a substitute for several behavioral examples. Escape newline as `\n`, a literal pipe as `\|`, and a backslash as `\\` inside table cells. + +Use a Doc String for supported multiline text. Prefer `"""` delimiters for broad editor support; a content type may follow the opening delimiter when supplied or useful. Preserve indentation relative to the opening delimiter. + +## Descriptions, tags, and comments + +Free-form descriptions may follow `Feature`, `Rule`, `Background`, `Scenario` or `Example`, and `Scenario Outline`; Markdown is permitted and ignored during execution. Use descriptions for purpose or rationale that helps readers, not for unresolved claims presented as settled behavior. + +Tags are metadata rather than evidence of behavior; a test suite may use them for selection or conditional hooks. Preserve supplied tags or report the need for suite policy; do not invent organizational metadata during elicitation. + +Comments begin with `#` at the start of a new line after optional indentation. Gherkin has no block comments. Do not hide a second epistemic workpiece in comments; keep unsupported behavior and open matters in the companion workpiece. + +## Checks + +### Behavior fidelity + +- Each feature description, rule, example, and step traces to the current workpiece or supplied document; authoring choices remain distinguishable from person-supplied wording where consequential. +- Every `Rule` has at least one example that illustrates it, or the missing example is reported outside the target as a delivery gap. +- A reader can identify the starting state, focal event or action, and observable outcome of each example without guessing hidden implementation. +- Examples with apparently identical context and action do not assert different outcomes unless a named condition, rule, or unresolved conflict distinguishes them. +- Current behavior has not silently replaced proposed behavior or vice versa. + +### Gherkin structure + +- The first primary keyword is `Feature:` and the file contains exactly one feature. +- Keywords that require a colon have one; step keywords do not gain one. The parser, when available, is the authority for exact grammar. +- A `Background` appears before the first example at its level and no level has more than one. +- Every Scenario Outline placeholder is supplied by each applicable `Examples` table, and every table has a header and at least one row. +- Doc String delimiters close, Data Table rows are well formed, comments begin on their own lines, and localization is declared consistently. + +### Step language and execution claims + +- Step phrases use the team's domain language and do not differ accidentally in tense, synonyms, or incidental wording. +- When a step lexicon or codebase index is available, each phrase is classified as an exact known binding, an intentional new phrase, or an unresolved near match. Without such a source, binding remains unchecked. +- Parse validity proves only that a Gherkin parser accepts the document. Binding validity additionally requires matching step definitions. Executability additionally requires the relevant test runtime, hooks, fixtures, and system path. Never substitute one claim for another. + +### Revision + +- The changed behavior and target delta are named before editing. +- Unaffected descriptions, rules, examples, tags, comments, and team phrasing remain unchanged unless a supported factoring or check requires movement. +- Factoring repeated context into a Background or examples into an Outline preserves behavior and does not hide a meaningful distinction. +- New or changed phrases have an explicit binding status rather than silently inheriting an old step's implementation. + +## Delivery + +Deliver each target document as a complete `.feature` text, labeled with its intended filename when known. Also deliver the current behavior workpiece when unresolved authorship, assumptions, conflicts, unillustrated rules, unchecked bindings, or other consequential gaps remain. + +State plainly: + +- what behavior was elicited, revised, authored, or merely reformatted; +- which examples illustrate which rules and what remains unsupported; +- whether each document was authored only, parser-checked, binding-checked against a named source, or executed elsewhere; +- which assumptions, authoring normalizations, new step phrases, omissions, and open matters remain; and +- the smallest consequential question, reference source, or capability needed next. + +Do not replace that account with a closed outcome label or call a parser-valid document an executable specification without the corresponding evidence. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin/gherkin-specification/gherkin-elicitation.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin/gherkin-specification/gherkin-elicitation.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..46a4a3693cf --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin/gherkin-specification/gherkin-elicitation.md @@ -0,0 +1,153 @@ +# Software-Behavior and Gherkin Elicitation + +This reference adds software-behavior and Gherkin-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance. + +The registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests behavior distinctions that may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what a signable behavior account may need. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Gherkin grammar and document checks live in `gherkin-authoring-and-checks.md`. + +## Directives + +### Specify behavior in the person's language + +Ask about situations, actors or external systems, events, actions, rules, and observable outcomes in the vocabulary used by the people who need the behavior. Keep `Given`/`When`/`Then`, file structure, automation code, fixtures, and selectors backstage until target authoring. + +### Keep intended and current behavior distinct + +Normative language may be the desired product, not a defective report of practice. Establish whether the person is describing what happens now, what should happen, or a discrepancy that matters. Do not force a proposed rule through a last-occurrence test as though only observed behavior were legitimate. + +### Let examples illustrate rules + +Use concrete examples to discriminate and correct a general rule. Do not promote one memorable case into a universal rule without checking its boundary, and do not leave a load-bearing rule with no example showing how a reader would decide whether it held. + +### Keep observable behavior separate from implementation + +Describe outcomes visible to a person or external system. Interface gestures, database records, function calls, selectors, and test fixtures are not the behavior unless the stated purpose specifically makes that interface or integration contract observable. + +### Do not invent suite integration + +Step definitions, tags, locale, aliases, and naming conventions may be supplied by a team or available project. Without that source, preserve the intended phrase and mark its binding or convention as new, unavailable, or unchecked. + +## Recognition + +Recognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread. + +### Rule-shaped language + +“Always,” “never,” “only,” “unless,” “whenever,” “must,” “may,” and “cannot” may state a business rule, permission, invariant, or exception. Determine its scope and find a concrete example that would distinguish it from a slogan. + +### Example-shaped stories + +“Last time,” “for example,” “one user,” and narratives with specific values may already contain a context, event, and outcome. Preserve the details before generalizing. + +### Same action, different outcome + +Two accounts with the same apparent context and action but different outcomes may expose a missing state, actor distinction, business rule, or genuine conflict. + +### Expected but unobservable result + +“It works,” “it is handled,” “it succeeds,” and “the record is updated” may name an intention or hidden implementation state rather than an outcome a user or external system can observe. + +### Gesture-shaped description + +Clicks, screens, buttons, fields, API methods, and internal components may be the person's natural route into the example while obscuring the capability or externally meaningful event. Preserve them when they are contractually observable; otherwise ask what the actor is trying to accomplish or what another system sends or receives. + +### Boundary and partition language + +Thresholds, ranges, roles, lifecycle states, permissions, dates, limits, and categories may divide behavior into equivalence classes. Boundaries just below, at, and above a threshold may deserve separate examples when the rule changes there. + +### Repeated context or data shape + +Context repeated across several examples may become a `Background`; examples differing only by named values may become a `Scenario Outline`. These are target-authoring possibilities, not behavior facts and not reasons to manufacture repetition. + +## Operations + +Use the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to software-behavior specification. + +### Follow one behavior end to end + +Choose one concrete case and establish the relevant starting context, one focal event or action, and what a person or external system can observe afterward. Keep incidental setup and multiple downstream behaviors out of the example unless they are necessary to understand the rule. + +### State the candidate rule for correction + +After one or more examples expose a stable relationship, offer the general rule in domain language and ask for correction. Mark it as your proposed normalization until the person settles it. + +### Contrast satisfaction and violation + +For a consequential rule, ask for a nearby example where it does not apply, is refused, or yields another outcome. Vary one relevant condition so the contrast reveals the rule rather than creating an unrelated story. + +### Probe a boundary + +When behavior changes at a threshold, ask which cases just below, at, and just above matter. Record only supported values and outcomes; the familiar boundary triad is a prompt for attention, not an automatic requirement. + +### Separate current from proposed with the same example + +When the person is changing behavior, ask what the selected example does now and what it should do. Preserve both statuses without presenting the desired result as observed or the current result as accepted. + +### Ground reusable step language + +When an actual step lexicon or repository is available, compare the intended phrase with known team language. Ask whether a near match expresses the same behavior or a distinct one. Without a lexicon, retain the domain phrase and defer binding; do not ask the person to remember hidden implementation names as a substitute for inspection. + +### Sweep rules and examples + +After a concrete slice exposes the feature's structure, sweep one concern: rules without illustrating examples, examples without observable outcomes, edge classes without coverage, current/proposed ambiguity, or phrases whose binding remains unchecked. Do not traverse target keywords merely because they exist. + +## Coverage + +Coverage identifies what the behavior workpiece may need for its purpose and downstream Gherkin authoring. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories. + +### Capability, value, boundary, and status + +Preserve who or what benefits, what the capability enables, why it matters, what software or interaction boundary is in scope, and whether each account describes current or proposed behavior. + +### Business rules and rationale + +Preserve each rule generally enough to apply beyond one story, its scope and exceptions, why the distinction matters when useful, and at least one example that illustrates it or a visible gap where none is yet supported. + +### Concrete behavior examples + +Preserve the starting context that selects the behavior, the focal event or action, and the externally observable outcome. Retain specific values, actors, states, channels, and timing only where they discriminate the rule. + +### Contrasts, failures, and boundaries + +Preserve supported unhappy paths, refusals, absent permissions, invalid inputs, failures, state-dependent results, and threshold cases that materially define the rule. Do not demand one example from every familiar test-design category. + +### Actors, external systems, and domain language + +Preserve roles and systems whose differences change behavior, consequential terms in the team's language, and any supplied step vocabulary or naming convention. Do not turn every noun into an independently elicited target element. + +### Shared context and tabular variation + +Preserve repeated preconditions and repeated value dimensions so authoring can decide whether `Background`, `Scenario Outline`, or separate examples communicate them best. The target structure is a later choice; the workpiece keeps the behavior readable before factoring. + +### Target-document conventions and integration inputs + +When supplied, preserve spoken-language locale, preferred keyword aliases, tags, file naming, step lexicon, and the source against which binding or execution could be checked. Suite organization carries no behavior by itself and should not consume interview time without a delivery need. + +## Verification + +Apply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Grammar, authoring, parse, and binding checks live in `gherkin-authoring-and-checks.md`. + +### Purpose, rules, and examples + +- The feature purpose states who or what benefits, what capability is enabled, and why it matters at the depth the intended readers need. +- Each load-bearing rule is stated generally and has a supported concrete example or a visible gap. +- Each example has enough starting context to select the behavior, one focal event or action, and an observable outcome. +- Contrasting examples differ on a named consequential condition rather than accidentally contradicting each other. + +### Behavior and authorship + +- Current and proposed behavior remain distinguishable. +- An outcome names something visible to a person or external system rather than an intention or hidden implementation state. +- Agent-supplied rules, phrasings, values, examples, and partitions retain agent authorship until settled. +- A single story has not silently become a universal rule, and a familiar test pattern has not generated unsupported cases. +- Unknown behavior, open conflicts, unillustrated rules, and unchecked step bindings remain visible rather than disappearing into polished target text. + +### Failure signals and repairs + +- **Syntax-led interview:** questions traverse `Feature`, `Rule`, `Scenario`, or step keywords. Return to one concrete behavior in the person's language. +- **Story without rule:** examples accumulate but no one can say what behavior each discriminates. Propose the smallest candidate rule for correction. +- **Rule without witness:** a general rule has no concrete example. Ask for a supported case or mark the gap. +- **Outcome restates action:** “when it saves, then it is saved” supplies no observable result. Ask what a person or external system notices. +- **Implementation capture:** steps become clicks, selectors, function calls, or database assertions without a purpose that makes them observable. Translate back to behavior or name the interface contract explicitly. +- **Missing selector:** apparently identical context and action yield different outcomes. Preserve both and investigate the state, rule, or conflict that distinguishes them. +- **Desired-as-observed:** proposed behavior is presented as current evidence. Restore status and authorship. +- **Invented binding:** a phrase is described as an existing executable step without a lexicon or code check. Mark it new or unchecked. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin/gherkin-specification/workpiece-template.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin/gherkin-specification/workpiece-template.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..550b66e7915 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin/gherkin-specification/workpiece-template.md @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ +# Behavior-Specification Workpiece and Recording Contract + +The workpiece is the shared, recoverable software-behavior account. Elicitation and revision maintain it; Gherkin authoring consumes it. The transcript remains evidence, and the `.feature` document remains a target rendering rather than the sole home of unresolved meaning. + +Follow the person's thread during conversation and file material into the workpiece afterward. Its headings are recording homes, not question order. The structure is near the target because software-behavior examples map closely to Gherkin, but it does not require target keywords or step decomposition. + +## Recording distinctions + +Use the authorship and uncertainty distinctions from `universal-elicitation.md`; do not redeclare them as a Gherkin ontology. This workpiece adds only distinctions the software-behavior/Gherkin pairing requires: + +- **Behavior status** — Whether an account describes current or proposed behavior, or a discrepancy between them. +- **Rule and example** — The general behavior and the concrete case illustrating it. A case does not become a rule merely because target text can be written for it. +- **Behavior content and authoring choice** — What the software must do versus how the agent names, groups, phrases, or factors it in Gherkin. +- **Integration status** — Whether target text is only authored, accepted by a parser, matched against a named step-definition source, or executed through a named runtime path. + +## Workpiece template + +```markdown +# Behavior-Specification Workpiece + +## Purpose and scope + +### Feature value narrative + +Who or what benefits, what the capability enables, and why it matters. + +### Current, proposed, or mixed account + +### Intended readers and use + +### Software boundary and deliberate non-goals + +### What the result must not claim + +## Domain language and integration context + +### Actors and external systems + +### Consequential terms and meanings + +### Supplied locale, conventions, tags, or step lexicon + +## Rules and examples + +### Rule: + +#### Working statement, behavior status, and authorship + +#### Why this distinction matters + +#### Example: + +##### Starting context + +##### Focal event or action + +##### Observable outcome + +##### Rule distinction, boundary, or contrast demonstrated + +##### Exact person evidence and authoring choices where needed + +#### Contrasting or boundary example: + +Add only when it exposes a consequential condition the first example does not. + +Repeat rules and examples as needed. An example may remain directly under the feature when no separate business rule is useful; state what it demonstrates. + +## Authoring candidates + +### Context shared across examples + +### Value dimensions that may form an outline + +### Candidate target files and feature grouping + +### New, known, and unchecked step phrases + +## Open matters and authorship + +For each consequential matter, record its universal state—agent proposal or assumption, unknown, not yet asked, declined, deferred, conflict, correction, contextual coexistence, or deliberate omission—plus what it affects and what would resolve or re-enter it. + +Record target-formalism and integration gaps separately from unknown behavior. A supported rule can be clear while its phrase binding or runtime capability remains unavailable. + +## Delivery status + +### What this workpiece currently supports + +### Consequential gaps + +### Gherkin status and check evidence +``` + +## Maintenance + +- Prefer the person's domain terms for rules, examples, actors, and outcomes. +- Keep one authoritative home for each active rule and example. Record corrections without leaving the obsolete and current forms as competing behavior. +- Do not force a person-supplied example into step lines while interviewing. Context, event or action, and outcome are enough for the workpiece; authoring owns target decomposition. +- Keep current and proposed versions side by side only when their contrast is the subject; otherwise state which account is active and preserve the old one as correction history. +- Remove irrelevant empty sections. Record an unresolved state only when it matters to later work. +- If authoring requires transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing rule or outcome, the workpiece is incomplete at that boundary. +- Record separately whether target text was not authored, authored only, parser-checked, binding-checked against a named source, or executed by an external test path. From d08d5ad1027d04f2284d6dfa8009be67bc055a80 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 15:55:50 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 030/101] Add the domain-primary readiness candidate --- .../five-register-synthesis/EVALUATION.md | 4 +- .../_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md | 27 ++- .../five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md | 5 +- .../domain-primary-with-readiness/README.md | 23 ++ .../domain-primary-with-readiness/profile.md | 213 ++++++++++++++++++ .../sdcpn-readiness.md | 89 ++++++++ .../skill.ts.example | 26 +++ .../sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md | 4 +- 8 files changed, 376 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/README.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/profile.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/sdcpn-readiness.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/skill.ts.example diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/EVALUATION.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/EVALUATION.md index 0c759f99300..08823d60536 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/EVALUATION.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/EVALUATION.md @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ Replace the profile's Coverage register with `plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/cover ### C — domain-primary elicitation plus a separate construction-readiness view -Use domain-primary Coverage and a domain-primary workpiece, but remove formalism-completeness pressure from ordinary elicitation. At construction time, apply a separate SDCPN readiness view that references authoritative workpiece claims without reorganizing or duplicating them. This candidate is reserved before authoring so its evaluation criteria cannot be fitted to its eventual wording. +Use [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/). Its candidate-specific profile retains domain-primary Coverage and removes construction-readiness checks from ordinary elicitation; its skill composition reuses the domain-primary workpiece and adds a construction-only SDCPN readiness resource. The resulting view cites authoritative workpiece claims under the existing `Construction notes` without reorganizing or duplicating them. This candidate was preregistered here before its wording was authored. ## Shared invariants @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ Every candidate uses the same: - core and plugin system prompts; - universal progressive reference; - lifecycle instructions and runtime branches; -- additive, register-pure plugin guidance outside the candidate-specific Coverage material; +- additive, register-pure plugin guidance outside the candidate-specific Coverage and construction-readiness treatment; - workpiece locality rule; - construction guidance and three evidence levels; - tool set, model configuration, case inputs, turn limits, graders, and stop rules within a comparison stage. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md index dad5ede0c22..fd5be6a5118 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ This candidate remaps the current core prompt, SDCPN prompt material, runbook sk 14. A workpiece claim, its evidence, and its epistemic treatment share one authoritative location under the relevant concern. Only unresolved matters spanning concerns or requiring later re-entry enter a compact cross-cutting issue ledger, which references rather than restates claims. 15. Construction evidence is reported at one of three non-collapsible levels: tool-schema acceptance, agent-reviewed structural correspondence, and behavior observed through an actual execution or stronger analysis. Every claim stays within the scope of the method that produced it. 16. [`EVALUATION.md`](EVALUATION.md) owns the repeatable candidate comparison: frozen instruments, authority checks, owner-led walkthroughs, model-facing observables, campaign boundary, and disposition rules. +17. Candidate C keeps ordinary elicitation and its workpiece domain-primary, then applies a construction-only SDCPN readiness view whose entries cite authoritative workpiece claims rather than reproducing them. ## Candidate topology @@ -43,10 +44,16 @@ five-register-synthesis/ ├── workpiece-template.md ├── pn-construction.md ├── checks.md - └── coverage-alternatives/ - ├── domain-primary.md - ├── formalism-primary.md - └── formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md + ├── coverage-alternatives/ + │ ├── domain-primary.md + │ ├── formalism-primary.md + │ └── formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md + └── candidates/ + └── domain-primary-with-readiness/ + ├── README.md + ├── profile.md + ├── sdcpn-readiness.md + └── skill.ts.example ``` ### Responsibilities @@ -60,6 +67,7 @@ five-register-synthesis/ - [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md) is the recoverable process-model artifact, with operational claims, evidence, and epistemic treatment co-located and a reference-only cross-cutting issue ledger. - [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md) contains construction mappings and patterns disclosed only during construction. - [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md) separates tool-schema acceptance, agent-reviewed structural correspondence, and behavioral execution or stronger analysis before checking fidelity, revision, and delivery. +- [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/) contains Candidate C's complete profile, construction-only readiness resource, and hashable Flue composition while reusing the domain-primary workpiece. - [`EVALUATION.md`](EVALUATION.md) is the sole authority for comparing Coverage/workpiece/readiness candidates and deciding whether finer progressive disclosure is earned. ## How to read the synthesized set @@ -80,19 +88,20 @@ Read [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelli For elicitation or revision, follow its pointers to: 1. [`core/universal-elicitation.md`](core/universal-elicitation.md) -2. [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md) -3. [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md) when the workpiece is first created or materially revised +2. The profile selected by [`EVALUATION.md`](EVALUATION.md): the shared [`profile.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md) for Candidates A and B, or Candidate C's [`profile.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/profile.md) +3. The paired workpiece selected by [`EVALUATION.md`](EVALUATION.md) when it is first created or materially revised: the domain-primary [`workpiece-template.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md) for Candidates A and C, or the [`formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md) alternative for Candidate B For construction and net delivery, additionally read: -1. [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md) -2. [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md) +1. Candidate C only: [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/sdcpn-readiness.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/sdcpn-readiness.md) +2. [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md) +3. [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md) Workpiece-only delivery uses the universal and plugin Verification registers without disclosing construction resources. ## Evaluation -The profile currently uses a domain-typology-primary Coverage index provisionally. Do not decide between it and the alternatives from this README. Follow [`EVALUATION.md`](EVALUATION.md), which preregisters three candidates: domain-primary, formalism-primary, and domain-primary elicitation/workpiece organization plus a separate SDCPN construction-readiness view. +The shared profile currently uses a domain-typology-primary Coverage index provisionally. Do not decide between it and the alternatives from this README. Follow [`EVALUATION.md`](EVALUATION.md), which preregisters three candidates: domain-primary, formalism-primary, and [`domain-primary elicitation/workpiece organization plus a separate SDCPN construction-readiness view`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/). The protocol owns the shared invariants, mechanical audit, owner-led cases, model-facing observations, evidence walls, decision rule, and the threshold for splitting progressive resources. After a candidate wins, remove losing alternatives from the live candidate instrument and preserve only the comparison evidence. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md index 18e478ec528..5a5248827b3 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ This map accounts for the primary working and draft material used to produce the | `pn-construction.md` | SDCPN mappings, construction patterns, inference, bounded change, and losses | Active `pn-construction.md`; APPEND `Maps To` material; Ciaran transformation patterns | | `checks.md` | Phase-boundary, net, fidelity, revision, and delivery checks | Active `checks.md`; APPEND smells/rabbit holes/failure signatures; current construction tool contract | | `coverage-alternatives/*` | Concrete comparison at the unresolved Coverage-index fog-line | Active typology table; Ciaran headings; predecessor kind-indexed question reference | +| `candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/*` | Candidate C's domain-primary elicitation profile, construction-only SDCPN readiness projection, and complete skill composition | Preregistered third candidate; shared domain-primary profile/workpiece; construction boundary; workpiece locality rule | | `EVALUATION.md` | Preregistered authority audit, owner-led walkthrough, model-facing comparison, campaign boundary, and disposition rule | Competing-design review; Mission 4 proof and fog-line; `prospective-runbook-v1`; `ir-quality-ruler-v1`; frozen baseline adjudication | ## Active core system prompt @@ -66,7 +67,7 @@ Sources: `packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/`. The active skill's conceptual lifecycle, `runbook-ir` full-document emission convention, partial delivery, and phase resource routing move to plain `instructions.md`. The candidate requires a final full workpiece emission before construction handoff and workpiece-only delivery. It also distinguishes the current interactive and construct-only runtime branches: construct-only execution reports a re-entry question instead of interviewing. Existing-model revision applies fully to the workpiece and only to net changes supported by mounted mutation capabilities. -The plugin-owned `skill.ts.example` demonstrates Flue's native `defineSkill` to map the instructions, core-owned universal reference, and plugin-owned profile/template/construction/check resources into one packaged skill. Flue synthesizes the packaged `SKILL.md`; no authored duplicate remains. +The plugin-owned `skill.ts.example` demonstrates Flue's native `defineSkill` to map the instructions, core-owned universal reference, and plugin-owned profile/template/construction/check resources into one packaged skill. Flue synthesizes the packaged `SKILL.md`; no authored duplicate remains. Candidate C supplies its own complete composition example that substitutes a profile without ordinary elicitation readiness checks and advertises a construction-only readiness resource while reusing the shared domain-primary workpiece. ### `elicitation.md` @@ -80,7 +81,7 @@ The active file's Ciaran-derived “What to investigate” headings seed the dom ### `ir-template.md` -The candidate retains a human-readable Markdown workpiece, full `runbook-ir` emission, expert vocabulary, assumptions, unknowns, conflict, omissions, and losses. Each operational claim now owns its exact evidence, normalized account, agent inference, assumption, correction, conflict, or contextual variation locally when those distinctions matter. A compact central ledger holds only unresolved matters spanning concerns or requiring re-entry and references rather than restates authoritative claims. These annotations are structural aids, not mandatory per-statement types. Because Coverage indexing remains unresolved, the workbench contains aligned domain-primary and formalism-primary workpiece candidates under the same locality rule rather than treating one artifact shape as settled. +The candidate retains a human-readable Markdown workpiece, full `runbook-ir` emission, expert vocabulary, assumptions, unknowns, conflict, omissions, and losses. Each operational claim now owns its exact evidence, normalized account, agent inference, assumption, correction, conflict, or contextual variation locally when those distinctions matter. A compact central ledger holds only unresolved matters spanning concerns or requiring re-entry and references rather than restates authoritative claims. These annotations are structural aids, not mandatory per-statement types. Because Coverage indexing remains unresolved, the workbench contains aligned domain-primary and formalism-primary workpiece candidates under the same locality rule rather than treating one artifact shape as settled. Candidate C reuses the domain-primary workpiece and places a derived reference-only SDCPN view inside its existing `Construction notes`; it does not introduce a second operational account. ### `pn-construction.md` diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/README.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/README.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b3ca5c1510c --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +# Candidate C — Domain-Primary Account with SDCPN Readiness View + +**Status: non-authoritative evaluation candidate.** Package this candidate alone when comparing it with Candidates A and B. + +## Assembly + +Candidate C reuses the shared system prompts, `instructions.md`, domain-primary `workpiece-template.md`, `pn-construction.md`, and `checks.md`. Its [`skill.ts.example`](skill.ts.example) substitutes this directory's [`profile.md`](profile.md) and adds [`sdcpn-readiness.md`](sdcpn-readiness.md) as a construction-only resource. + +The candidate-specific profile is complete rather than a textual patch so a comparison runner can hash and package its exact model-facing instrument without mutating shared source files. Relative to the shared Candidate A profile, it removes the construction-readiness subsection and frames Coverage and Verification around the operational account needed for the stated simulation use. It retains the same Directives, Recognition, Operations, domain-primary Coverage concerns, and target-specific failure repairs. + +## Separation of responsibility + +- `profile.md` guides operational-process elicitation and workpiece maintenance without imposing SDCPN completeness during ordinary questions. +- The shared `workpiece-template.md` remains the sole operational account and keeps every claim, evidence item, and epistemic treatment at one domain-primary authoritative location. +- `sdcpn-readiness.md` is read only after construction is requested. It projects workpiece references through SDCPN readiness lenses and writes reference-only consequences or gaps into the existing `Construction notes`. +- The shared `pn-construction.md` owns mapping choices and patterns. +- The shared `checks.md` owns tool-schema acceptance, structural comparison, behavioral evidence, fidelity, and delivery checks. + +The readiness view never becomes a second workpiece. If it exposes a missing or changed operational fact, that fact is written at its authoritative workpiece location and only referenced from `Construction notes`. + +## Evaluation boundary + +Evaluate this candidate according to the repository workbench's [`EVALUATION.md`](../../../../EVALUATION.md). Do not infer a win from its separation of elicitation and construction concerns; the paper walkthrough and any authorized model-facing probes must compare whether it exposes consequential target gaps at the right time without duplicating claims or inducing formalism-shaped questions. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/profile.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/profile.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e8719b5d442 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/profile.md @@ -0,0 +1,213 @@ +# Operational-Process / SDCPN Profile + +This profile adds the operational-process domain typology and SDCPN target-formalism concerns that are absent from the universal elicitation reference. It contains no facts about a particular operation. Apply both layers under the same five registers; where this profile is silent, universal guidance still applies. + +The registers are addresses, not a questionnaire or phase sequence. Recognition names operational signals and the hypotheses they support. Operations adapt universal interviewing moves to process modelling. Coverage states what the domain-primary workpiece may need to preserve for the simulation use. Verification detects gaps in the elicited operational account. SDCPN construction readiness and mapping are outside this profile. + +## Directives + +### Model for an explicit simulation use + +Develop an operational account that can support the person's stated simulation question or decision. Establish what may be varied, what response matters, and what observation would make the model credible enough for that use. Detail that cannot affect the stated use does not become necessary merely because the process contains it. + +### Keep formal notation backstage + +Ask about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, and target schemas may guide internal attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions. + +### Preserve distinctions that can change simulated behavior + +Keep entity or activity type, direction, operating regime, calendar, load, resource state, and other selecting conditions when they change what occurs or how a quantity applies. Do not collapse distinct operational contexts into one target parameter for convenience. + +## Recognition + +Recognition entries identify possibilities, not facts or automatic next steps. Confirm the operational meaning before recording it. + +### Language and situation signals + +- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction between types of work or resource. +- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, or uncontrolled boundary input. +- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate an operational constraint, policy, or exception boundary. +- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a threshold, or a mode change. +- **A duration crossing a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may indicate that availability and elapsed work time differ. +- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, or dataset named in passing** may play the role of performer, contended resource, prerequisite, or information source. +- **A physical location** may matter through boundary, capacity, eligibility, travel, state, or resource effects; it does not imply a Petri-net place. +- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what admits or enables work rather than an ordinary step. + +### Recurring operational shapes + +#### Timed work + +A step occupies elapsed time or timing affects the objective. This may require distinguishing an activity from its in-progress interval. + +#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome + +The same activity can produce different outcomes. This may require a deciding condition, observed likelihood, or explicit unknown. + +#### Contended resource + +Several activities want the same limited capability. This may be a reusable resource that becomes unavailable while held rather than an input that is consumed. + +#### Consumed, reserved, or read input + +An activity uses something by transforming it, holding it temporarily, or observing it without making it unavailable. The same thing may play different roles in different activities. + +#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement + +Work moves or is processed as a group whose formation, cohesion, split, or release may affect behavior. + +#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite + +An observable event or condition enables work. It may originate outside the process or be produced by an earlier activity. + +#### Mode change + +Setup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next and may have direction-dependent loss. + +#### Event rather than step + +A failure, interruption, deadline expiry, or unplanned arrival befalls the operation rather than advancing its normal flow. + +#### Threshold on a changing quantity + +A level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other evolving quantity crosses a boundary that changes process behavior. + +#### Policy under pressure + +More than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. The practiced selection rule may differ from the posted rule. + +#### Hidden waiting + +A gap between activities may reflect an unavailable input, resource, calendar, release rule, batch, transport, approval, or recovery condition rather than an independently elicited queue. + +#### Failure, retry, and recovery + +A case can fail to complete, repeat part or all of its work, enter an unhappy path, degrade, or recover. + +## Operations + +Use the universal Operations as the interviewing methods. These moves bind them to operational-process and SDCPN concerns. + +### Choose the case unit + +When several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Use that unit for the first slice. + +### Expose the process spine + +Follow the chosen case from admission to outcome. Ask what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs, and what ends or hands off the case. + +### Link the slice to the simulation objective + +As the case unfolds, ask which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated simulation question depends on. Return to the case when the objective still has no operational support. + +### Sweep one operational relation + +After the slice, choose one objective-relevant relation and examine it across the things already discovered. Useful process sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, type-dependent variation, practiced policy, failure/recovery, and boundary behavior. + +### Classify activity inputs + +For each load-bearing activity/input relation, ask whether the input is transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. For a reserved input, follow when and in what state it returns. + +### Trace disruption and recovery + +For a disruption the person recognizes, follow what happens to the work in hand, the whole case, occupied resources, retry, recovery, and terminal outcome. + +### Test contention with a borderline case + +When demand can exceed a resource's availability, ask about a recent contested or exceptional case to expose the practiced priority, tie-break, override, acquisition, and release behavior. + +### Follow waiting to its enabling condition + +Ask what the case is waiting for and which observable event makes it able to continue. Locate the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or recovery condition. + +### Compare both directions of a mode change + +Ask whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether the loss propagates beyond the local activity. Pursue time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences only where the operation distinguishes them. + +### Surface conservation + +When quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. + +### Anchor validation in an observable comparison + +Ask what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the simulation model credible for its intended question. Do not substitute the person's prediction of the answer for validation of the modeled process. + +## Coverage + +Coverage identifies what the domain-primary workpiece may need for the stated simulation use. It is not a questionnaire, closed ontology, or demand to populate irrelevant sections. + +### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds + +Preserve what the model must answer or compare, what may be varied, what should improve or be avoided, what “better” means, and any trade-off, safety condition, or threshold the person can judge. Record which operational material each objective depends on. Qualitative goals remain qualitative when no supported metric or weight exists. + +### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions + +Preserve what is inside and outside; what enters or leaves; what starts or admits a case; calendars and availability; approvals or instructions; external events; initial populations; and reliability of boundary inputs. + +### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources + +Preserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; consequential carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and the operational effect of location. A resource is a role combining a usable thing with availability, capacity, and contention behavior, not necessarily a separate target kind. + +### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use + +For each consequential activity, preserve its operational name, preconditions, performer, inputs, consumed/reserved/read use, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, occurrence when it is an event, mode-change loss, and variation by type or context. + +### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery + +Preserve activity order, branch and join conditions, interruptions, unhappy paths, retry and recovery behavior, effects on work and occupied resources, and terminal outcomes. Activities without stated order do not yet form a process spine. + +### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior + +Preserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, dependence on type/load/calendar/state, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets. Keep each value at the context and precision its source supports. + +### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes + +Preserve the rule used when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed and practiced accounts, and the context selecting each account. Keep correction, unresolved conflict, and contextual coexistence distinguishable. + +### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings + +Preserve the observation or comparison that would make the model credible, variables a real source might drive, units and update context, who or what is authoritative for missing values, and evidence that is not currently available. Unsupported live bindings and qualitative validation remain workpiece knowledge rather than implied implementation. + +### Cross-cutting simulation qualifiers + +Across the concerns above, preserve only the target-relevant qualifiers not already supplied by the universal reference: entity or activity type, direction, operating regime, calendar, load, resource state, and the context and supported precision of simulation quantities. + +### Concepts that do not imply independent target nodes + +- Waiting is explained by surrounding activities and enabling conditions and may later produce target structure. +- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies. +- A resource combines a usable thing with capacity, availability, and contention behavior. +- A physical location becomes target-relevant only through an operational effect. + +## Verification + +These checks assess whether the elicited operational account preserves the operational meaning needed for its stated simulation use. Universal Verification continues to own authorship, uncertainty, interaction load, generic divergence, and honest stopping. + +### Purpose and spine + +- At least one simulation question, decision, or comparison is stated in the person's terms. +- The account identifies a meaningful process boundary and concrete case. +- The case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, branch conditions where present, and an outcome or handoff. +- Every claimed objective depends on recorded process material or is visibly unsupported. + +### Resources and activity semantics + +- Each load-bearing input is classified as consumed, reserved/released, or read. +- Each objective-relevant contended resource has acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and an honest count or unknown. +- Waiting is associated with an evidenced enabling condition rather than treated as a self-explanatory queue. +- Direction-dependent mode changes retain their distinct losses. + +### Time and contextual variation + +- Each consequential duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains its applicable context and supported precision. +- A point value represents evidenced constancy or a named purpose-relative simplification, not missing variation. +- Prescribed/practiced regimes and other contextual variants remain distinct where they change behavior. + +### Target-specific failure signals and repairs + +- **Unsupported simulation objective:** no process material bears on the question. Return to a concrete case that can expose the dependency. +- **Dead process spine:** activities exist without order, admission, or outcome. Continue the slice at the missing connection. +- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired without release or an explicit terminal loss. Re-enter the activity/input relation. +- **Posted policy compiled as practice:** a document supplies the operative rule without an observed case. Test a contested or exceptional case. +- **Unsupported stochastic precision:** an average or invented distribution replaces consequential variation. Restore the source-supported value and context. +- **Pattern-generated process fact:** a recurring shape supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove the claim or ask whether the shape applies. +- **Formalism-shaped interview:** questions are framed as places, transitions, or arcs. Translate the active gap back into operational events, conditions, things, and consequences. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/sdcpn-readiness.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/sdcpn-readiness.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ace8eedbf06 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/sdcpn-readiness.md @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@ +# SDCPN Construction-Readiness View + +Read this only after construction has been requested and before choosing SDCPN mappings. Read the current domain-primary workpiece first. This view projects authoritative operational knowledge toward construction; it is not another account of the operation, an elicitation checklist, or evidence that a net will behave correctly. + +## Authority and location + +Write the view under the workpiece's existing `Construction notes`. Cite exact workpiece heading paths and compact claim names. Do not copy operational descriptions, values, rules, evidence, or epistemic annotations into the view. The cited operational account remains authoritative. + +Use the view to record only: + +- which workpiece references bear on an applicable SDCPN concern; +- the resulting construction obligation or candidate concern; +- a missing distinction that permits materially different representations; +- an anticipated capability limit or representation loss that mapping must confirm. + +When readiness work reveals a new operational fact, update that fact at its domain-primary authoritative location and leave only a reference here. When it reveals a cross-cutting unresolved matter, use the issue ledger according to its locality rule and reference that entry. A construct-only conversation cannot obtain new expert evidence: record the gap and smallest re-entry question instead. + +## Build the projection + +1. Select the smallest construction slice that bears on the stated simulation use. Reference its objective and authoritative case/process-spine material. +2. Walk the applicable lenses below. For each one, cite the workpiece locations that support a representation, or cite the location that should own a missing fact. +3. Record only the construction obligation, gap, or anticipated loss. Leave operational content at the cited location and defer concrete mappings, inferences, approximations, and defaults to `references/pn-construction.md`. +4. Block only the unsupported path when a missing distinction admits materially different structures. Unrelated supported structure may proceed when the current runtime can construct it safely. +5. Read `references/pn-construction.md` to choose mappings and `references/checks.md` to inspect the result. The readiness view does not replace either resource. + +The projection is complete enough to begin the selected construction slice when every load-bearing construction obligation traces to an authoritative workpiece reference, and every known gap that would materially change that slice is blocking or explicitly routed to re-entry. An inference, approximation, default, capability limit, or loss cannot substitute for a missing operational fact. + +## Readiness lenses + +These are construction addresses, not required headings and not question order. Omit a lens that cannot affect the selected use or slice. + +### Intended use and observable consequence + +Reference the question, comparison, decision, objective dependencies, and validation evidence that select what the net must expose. Record only the corresponding construction scope or a gap in observable support. + +### Flowing cases, carried state, and distinctions + +Reference what flows and any type, context, direction, mode, location, or state distinction that changes behavior. Record which distinctions any representation must preserve without translating every participant or location into an independent node; defer the concrete mapping to the construction resource. + +### Boundary and scenario state + +Reference admission triggers, prerequisites, initial populations, calendars, arrivals, external events, and terminal outcomes. Record what must be available to initialize or drive the selected slice; defer whether it belongs in core net structure, scenario state, or parameters. + +### Activities, events, and occupancy + +Reference consequential activities and events, including preconditions, inputs, outputs, state changes, duration, failure, and what remains occupied while work is in progress. Record whether timing or occupancy must be explicit; do not reproduce the activity account or choose its concrete factoring here. + +### Ordering, enabling, branching, and joining + +Reference the authoritative process spine, branch and join conditions, hidden waiting causes, retries, recovery, and handoffs. Record the enabling, selection, synchronization, or recovery semantics a mapping must preserve, or identify the missing condition that makes them ambiguous. + +### Input and resource semantics + +Reference each load-bearing consumed, reserved/released, or read relation and any capacity, availability, acquisition, changed-state return, contention, or terminal loss. Record the availability and return obligations a mapping must preserve, and flag any reusable resource whose release semantics are absent. + +### Policy and selection + +Reference practiced priorities, tie-breaks, overrides, eligibility, release rules, and the context selecting among them. Record the selection semantics a mapping must preserve. Preserve unsupported or conflicting policy as a gap rather than compiling a convenient rule. + +### Time, stochastic choice, and continuous change + +Reference consequential durations, distributions or qualitative variation, probabilities, rates, thresholds, resets, units, and selecting context. Record which quantitative or dynamic distinctions a mapping must preserve; keep unsupported precision visible as a gap or approximation and defer the concrete representation. + +### Representation and capability limits + +Reference operational material the target or mounted tools may not faithfully carry. Record an anticipated loss and affected objective under `Target-representation losses` for confirmation during mapping; flag unsupported updates or removals rather than assuming an additive workaround. + +## Reference-only shape + +Populate the workpiece's existing `Construction notes` headings with this reference-only shape; do not add a parallel readiness section. Omit empty groups rather than manufacturing content. + +```markdown +## Construction notes + +### Candidate target structures + +- **Selected slice** — references: ; scope: +- **** — references: ; consequence: + +### Questions reopened by construction + +- **** — authoritative home: ; consequence: ; re-entry: + +### Target-representation losses + +- **** — references: ; possible limit: ; consequence: +``` + +This view is a navigation aid, not a score, closed readiness state, duplicated summary, or promise that every target concern has been populated. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/skill.ts.example b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/skill.ts.example new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..052933e7c18 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/skill.ts.example @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ +import { defineSkill } from "@flue/runtime"; + +import { universalElicitationReference } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent/flue"; + +import checks from "../../checks.md?raw"; +import instructions from "../../instructions.md?raw"; +import pnConstruction from "../../pn-construction.md?raw"; +import workpieceTemplate from "../../workpiece-template.md?raw"; +import profile from "./profile.md?raw"; +import sdcpnReadiness from "./sdcpn-readiness.md?raw"; + +/** Candidate C: domain-primary elicitation with a construction-only readiness projection. */ +export const sdcpnModellingSkill = defineSkill({ + name: "sdcpn-modelling", + description: + "Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct an inspected SDCPN with an explicit evidence level when Petrinaut capabilities are available.", + instructions, + files: { + "references/checks.md": checks, + "references/pn-construction.md": pnConstruction, + "references/profile.md": profile, + "references/sdcpn-readiness.md": sdcpnReadiness, + "references/universal-elicitation.md": universalElicitationReference, + "templates/workpiece.md": workpieceTemplate, + }, +}); diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md index b68bfdd5494..aded4f7ee7f 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Before substantive elicitation or revision, read both references: Both use the same additive registers: **Directives**, **Recognition**, **Operations**, **Coverage**, and **Verification**. Universal guidance applies first. Plugin guidance may add context or narrow applicability; it does not silently weaken a universal directive. Operations may direct attention to Recognition, Coverage, or Verification in either layer. -Read `templates/workpiece.md` when creating or substantially revising the workpiece. Read `references/pn-construction.md` and `references/checks.md` only when preparing to construct, constructing, or checking a net. +Read `templates/workpiece.md` when creating or substantially revising the workpiece. When preparing to construct, read `references/sdcpn-readiness.md` first if that resource is advertised, then read `references/pn-construction.md` and `references/checks.md`. Keep these construction resources outside ordinary elicitation. ## Runtime branches @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ Whenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in Construct only from a recoverable workpiece. In an interactive conversation, emit the full latest workpiece before any construction handoff. In a construct-only conversation, treat the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Read the construction and checks resources before beginning. If mounted Petrinaut tools are available, use them for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting net JSON. If the necessary tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes. -Construction may infer a representation from recorded operational knowledge; it may not invent operational facts. Name inferences, approximations, defaults, and losses. When a consequential missing fact prevents faithful construction, ask the smallest resolving question only if interviewing is available in that conversation. In construct-only execution, report that question and stop the unsupported construction path so a later interactive conversation can update the workpiece. +When a construction-readiness view is available, project authoritative workpiece references into the existing `Construction notes` before choosing mappings. Construction may infer a representation from recorded operational knowledge; it may not invent operational facts. Name inferences, approximations, defaults, and losses. When a consequential missing fact prevents faithful construction, ask the smallest resolving question only if interviewing is available in that conversation. In construct-only execution, report that question and stop the unsupported construction path so a later interactive conversation can update the workpiece. ### Check and deliver From ee8d01a9a53b1ca9409220c51ac681a938b1e1c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 16:00:07 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 031/101] Record the five-register mechanical audit --- .../five-register-synthesis/EVALUATION.md | 10 +- .../_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md | 5 +- .../five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md | 1 + .../stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md | 94 +++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/evaluation/stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/EVALUATION.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/EVALUATION.md index 08823d60536..ae22930ecb8 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/EVALUATION.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/EVALUATION.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # Five-Register Synthesis Evaluation Protocol -**Status: draft preregistration for owner review; no candidate has passed or won.** This protocol belongs to the non-authoritative workbench. It does not modify the frozen prospective v1 baseline or authorize a paid run. +**Status: Stage 1 complete; Candidates A and C remain eligible, Candidate B is eliminated, and no candidate has won.** See [`evaluation/stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md`](evaluation/stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md). This protocol belongs to the non-authoritative workbench. It does not modify the frozen prospective v1 baseline or authorize a paid run. ## Decision this protocol must produce @@ -14,14 +14,20 @@ This protocol can establish which candidate best satisfies the current Mission 4 Use `plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md` and `plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md` as currently authored. Target readiness remains distributed between the profile's Verification register and `checks.md`. +**Stage 1: eligible.** + ### B — formalism-primary Coverage and workpiece Replace the profile's Coverage register with `plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary.md` and use `plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md`. All other authored material remains identical to A. +**Stage 1: eliminated.** Its mandatory Coverage resource exposes concrete SDCPN construction mechanics during ordinary elicitation, violating a preregistered hard gate. + ### C — domain-primary elicitation plus a separate construction-readiness view Use [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/). Its candidate-specific profile retains domain-primary Coverage and removes construction-readiness checks from ordinary elicitation; its skill composition reuses the domain-primary workpiece and adds a construction-only SDCPN readiness resource. The resulting view cites authoritative workpiece claims under the existing `Construction notes` without reorganizing or duplicating them. This candidate was preregistered here before its wording was authored. +**Stage 1: eligible.** + ## Shared invariants Every candidate uses the same: @@ -67,7 +73,7 @@ A candidate fails this stage if a resource pointer is broken, a workpiece propos ## Stage 2 — owner-led paper walkthrough -Walk every candidate through the same cases without rewriting candidate guidance during the comparison. +Walk every Stage 1-eligible candidate through the same cases without rewriting candidate guidance during the comparison. ### Cases diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md index fd5be6a5118..f43a972c721 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ five-register-synthesis/ ├── README.md ├── SOURCE-MAP.md ├── EVALUATION.md +├── evaluation/ +│ └── stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md ├── core/ │ ├── SYSTEM.md │ ├── flue.ts.example @@ -69,6 +71,7 @@ five-register-synthesis/ - [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md) separates tool-schema acceptance, agent-reviewed structural correspondence, and behavioral execution or stronger analysis before checking fidelity, revision, and delivery. - [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/) contains Candidate C's complete profile, construction-only readiness resource, and hashable Flue composition while reusing the domain-primary workpiece. - [`EVALUATION.md`](EVALUATION.md) is the sole authority for comparing Coverage/workpiece/readiness candidates and deciding whether finer progressive disclosure is earned. +- [`evaluation/stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md`](evaluation/stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md) records the executed mechanical audit, context accounting, hard-gate evidence, and candidate dispositions. ## How to read the synthesized set @@ -103,7 +106,7 @@ Workpiece-only delivery uses the universal and plugin Verification registers wit The shared profile currently uses a domain-typology-primary Coverage index provisionally. Do not decide between it and the alternatives from this README. Follow [`EVALUATION.md`](EVALUATION.md), which preregisters three candidates: domain-primary, formalism-primary, and [`domain-primary elicitation/workpiece organization plus a separate SDCPN construction-readiness view`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/). -The protocol owns the shared invariants, mechanical audit, owner-led cases, model-facing observations, evidence walls, decision rule, and the threshold for splitting progressive resources. After a candidate wins, remove losing alternatives from the live candidate instrument and preserve only the comparison evidence. +The protocol owns the shared invariants, mechanical audit, owner-led cases, model-facing observations, evidence walls, decision rule, and the threshold for splitting progressive resources. [`Stage 1`](evaluation/stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md) leaves Candidates A and C eligible and eliminates Candidate B because its mandatory Coverage resource exposes construction mechanics during ordinary elicitation. No candidate has won. After a candidate wins, remove losing alternatives from the live candidate instrument and preserve only the comparison evidence. ## Observed runtime boundaries diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md index 5a5248827b3..1774210a629 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ This map accounts for the primary working and draft material used to produce the | `coverage-alternatives/*` | Concrete comparison at the unresolved Coverage-index fog-line | Active typology table; Ciaran headings; predecessor kind-indexed question reference | | `candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/*` | Candidate C's domain-primary elicitation profile, construction-only SDCPN readiness projection, and complete skill composition | Preregistered third candidate; shared domain-primary profile/workpiece; construction boundary; workpiece locality rule | | `EVALUATION.md` | Preregistered authority audit, owner-led walkthrough, model-facing comparison, campaign boundary, and disposition rule | Competing-design review; Mission 4 proof and fog-line; `prospective-runbook-v1`; `ir-quality-ruler-v1`; frozen baseline adjudication | +| `evaluation/stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md` | Executed candidate manifests, context accounting, structural checks, hard-gate adjudication, and Stage 1 dispositions | `EVALUATION.md`; Candidates A–C at source commit `bc032a4264`; resource/import/register/duplication probes | ## Active core system prompt diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/evaluation/stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/evaluation/stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2d0e16bda6d --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/evaluation/stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ +# Stage 1 — Mechanical and Authority Audit + +**Status: complete. Candidates A and C remain eligible; Candidate B is eliminated by a preregistered hard gate. No candidate has won.** + +- Audit time: `2026-09-01T13:57:10Z` +- Candidate source commit: `bc032a4264a0529fe1a0ddc36348ea5a6bb33715` + +This is a structural audit of the authored instruments under [`../EVALUATION.md`](../EVALUATION.md). It does not claim how a model will behave, how well an elicited workpiece will reconstruct a real operation, or whether a constructed net will execute faithfully. + +## Candidate assemblies audited + +All candidates use the shared core system prompt, plugin append, skill instructions, universal elicitation reference, construction guidance, and checks. + +- **A — domain-primary:** shared `profile.md`, shared `workpiece-template.md`, and the shared `skill.ts.example` resource map. +- **B — formalism-primary:** the shared profile with its complete `## Coverage` section replaced by `coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary.md`, paired with `coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md`. The rendered profile preserves the shared Directives, Recognition, Operations, and Verification sections. +- **C — domain-primary with readiness view:** `candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/profile.md`, the shared domain-primary workpiece, the candidate-specific `sdcpn-readiness.md`, and its candidate-specific `skill.ts.example` resource map. + +Candidate B has no committed complete rendered profile or `defineSkill` composition. The audit could deterministically render its five-register profile for structure and word accounting, but B would need a complete hashable instrument before model-facing execution. This packaging incompleteness is not the eliminating finding below; its ordinary-elicitation construction content is. + +## Context and resource accounting + +Counts use `wc -w` over authored Markdown. “Ordinary activated total” includes skill instructions, both mandatory elicitation references, and the paired workpiece template; it excludes the always-on system fragments. Construction resources are conditional and excluded from ordinary elicitation. + +| Material | A | B | C | +| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | +| Always-on core plus plugin prompts | 468 | 468 | 468 | +| Activated skill instructions | 835 | 835 | 835 | +| Universal elicitation reference | 2,327 | 2,327 | 2,327 | +| Candidate plugin profile | 2,067 | 2,720 rendered | 2,031 | +| Paired workpiece template | 843 | 1,013 | 843 | +| Mandatory elicitation references | 4,394 | 5,047 | 4,358 | +| Ordinary activated total | 6,072 | 6,895 | 6,036 | +| Construction guidance plus checks | 2,741 | 2,741 | 2,741 | +| Candidate-only readiness resource | — | — | 937 | +| All construction-only references | 2,741 | 2,741 | 3,678 | + +Candidate C removes 36 words from ordinary activated context relative to A and adds a 937-word resource only on the construction branch. Candidate B adds 823 ordinary activated words relative to A. These counts describe placement and cost; they do not decide fidelity or attention quality. + +## Mechanical results + +| Check | A | B | C | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | +| Five registers present once and in required order | Pass | Pass in deterministic render | Pass | +| Local imports in a complete `defineSkill` example resolve | Pass | Not yet authored | Pass | +| Instruction pointers match advertised resource names | Pass | Render/package required | Pass | +| Exact duplicate prose sentences between universal and plugin references | 0 | 0 | 0 | +| Construction resources excluded from ordinary elicitation | Pass | **Fail** | Pass | +| Unsupported evidence-level claims | None found | None found | None found | + +Candidate A advertises `references/checks.md`, `references/pn-construction.md`, `references/profile.md`, `references/universal-elicitation.md`, and `templates/workpiece.md`. Candidate C advertises the same names plus `references/sdcpn-readiness.md`. The shared instructions point to those exact names and make the readiness read conditional on its being advertised. + +## Authority results + +### Workpiece claims + +The templates contain no scenario claims to duplicate. Structurally, all three state that each operational proposition has one authoritative location, keep evidence and epistemic treatment beside it, make the process spine reference local activity/resource entries, restrict the cross-cutting ledger to references, and make delivery status refer back rather than create another account. + +No competing authoritative home or centralized claim restatement is required by the templates. Whether a model follows that contract remains a Stage 2 or Stage 3 observation. + +### Construction readiness, mapping, and checking + +- **A:** ordinary elicitation sees three concise construction-readiness checks in plugin Verification, but not places, transitions, arcs, guards, or mapping recipes. Mapping remains in `pn-construction.md`, and evidence assessment remains in `checks.md`. +- **B:** mandatory Coverage names concrete SDCPN consequences before the construction branch, including colour sets, typed elements, resource tokens, source transitions, guards, factored transitions, intermediate places, resource arcs, arc types, priorities, state invariants, scalar simulation functions, differential equations, and crossing-triggered transitions. +- **C:** the ordinary profile says SDCPN readiness and mapping are outside it. The conditional readiness resource records only cited construction obligations, blocking gaps, and anticipated losses; it explicitly defers concrete mappings, inferences, approximations, and defaults to `pn-construction.md`, and result inspection to `checks.md`. + +### Evidence levels + +The shared checks distinguish tool-schema acceptance, agent-reviewed structural correspondence, and behavioral execution or stronger analysis. Static review uses bounded wording such as “candidate structural path,” “intended return structures,” and “apparently exclusive guards,” with explicit statements that these do not establish reachability, conservation, or runtime exclusivity. No candidate-specific material claims a stronger oracle. + +## Candidate B hard-gate adjudication + +**Claim:** Candidate B places construction mechanics in a resource that the shared instructions require before substantive elicitation. + +**Relied on by:** The Stage 1 eligibility decision under the preregistered rule: “A candidate fails this stage if … construction mechanics enter ordinary elicitation.” + +**Competing explanation:** The “Possible SDCPN consequences” are descriptive context rather than construction guidance and therefore do not cross the phase boundary. + +**Primary evidence:** `instructions.md` requires the plugin profile before substantive elicitation. Candidate B's replacement Coverage repeatedly names concrete target structures and transformations: factored start/progress/finish transitions, intermediate places, resource arcs, source transitions, arcs and arc types, guards, priorities, differential equations, and transitions triggered by threshold crossings. + +**Discriminator:** Does a mandatory ordinary-elicitation resource expose concrete target construction structures or only operational concerns and phase-boundary checks? + +**Observation:** Candidate B exposes concrete target construction structures in eight “Possible SDCPN consequences” passages. Candidates A and C keep those mappings behind the construction-resource pointer. + +**Disposition:** **Hard-gate failure.** Calling the passages “possible consequences” does not remove the target structures from model context or preserve the preregistered phase boundary. This structural result does not prove that B would ask schema-shaped questions; it establishes the narrower failure that construction mechanics are present during ordinary elicitation. + +## Stage 1 disposition + +- **Candidate A:** eligible for Stage 2. +- **Candidate B:** eliminated; retain its source and this audit as comparison evidence, but do not spend Stage 2 or paid-run effort on it. +- **Candidate C:** eligible for Stage 2. + +Stage 1 does not choose between A and C. Stage 2 must compare their owner-led case traces, especially whether A's always-visible readiness checks expose target gaps at useful times or whether C's construction-only reference projection preserves operational questioning while surfacing those gaps no later than needed. + +Progressive-disclosure strain was not established by this audit. Word count alone does not earn another resource split. From 302e3f55084a6140a0b04e717388453849435412 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 16:13:36 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 032/101] five-register post-review fixing --- .../five-register-synthesis/EVALUATION.md | 16 +- .../_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md | 32 +-- .../five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md | 16 +- .../stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md | 4 + .../stage-2-owner-led-paper-walkthrough.md | 171 ++++++++++++++ .../domain-primary-with-readiness/README.md | 23 -- .../domain-primary-with-readiness/profile.md | 213 ------------------ .../sdcpn-readiness.md | 89 -------- .../skill.ts.example | 26 --- .../coverage-alternatives/domain-primary.md | 72 ------ .../formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md | 134 ----------- .../formalism-primary.md | 119 ---------- .../sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md | 4 +- 13 files changed, 204 insertions(+), 715 deletions(-) create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/evaluation/stage-2-owner-led-paper-walkthrough.md delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/README.md delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/profile.md delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/sdcpn-readiness.md delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/skill.ts.example delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/domain-primary.md delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/EVALUATION.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/EVALUATION.md index ae22930ecb8..c007972edf5 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/EVALUATION.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/EVALUATION.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # Five-Register Synthesis Evaluation Protocol -**Status: Stage 1 complete; Candidates A and C remain eligible, Candidate B is eliminated, and no candidate has won.** See [`evaluation/stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md`](evaluation/stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md). This protocol belongs to the non-authoritative workbench. It does not modify the frozen prospective v1 baseline or authorize a paid run. +**Status: paper comparison complete; the owner selected Candidate A.** Candidate B was eliminated in [`Stage 1`](evaluation/stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md); [`Stage 2`](evaluation/stage-2-owner-led-paper-walkthrough.md) found Candidate C feasible but not earned and applied the protocol's smaller-reversible fallback. The losing instrument sources were removed after disposition and remain recoverable at commit `2fb4c779a2`. Stage 3 is skipped. This protocol belongs to the non-authoritative workbench and does not modify the frozen prospective v1 baseline. ## Decision this protocol must produce @@ -14,19 +14,19 @@ This protocol can establish which candidate best satisfies the current Mission 4 Use `plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md` and `plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md` as currently authored. Target readiness remains distributed between the profile's Verification register and `checks.md`. -**Stage 1: eligible.** +**Selected by owner after Stage 2.** ### B — formalism-primary Coverage and workpiece -Replace the profile's Coverage register with `plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary.md` and use `plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md`. All other authored material remains identical to A. +This historical candidate replaced the shared profile's Coverage register with a formalism-primary index and paired it with a formalism-primary workpiece. Its exact source is retained at commit `2fb4c779a2`. -**Stage 1: eliminated.** Its mandatory Coverage resource exposes concrete SDCPN construction mechanics during ordinary elicitation, violating a preregistered hard gate. +**Eliminated in Stage 1 and removed after owner disposition.** Its mandatory Coverage resource exposed concrete SDCPN construction mechanics during ordinary elicitation, violating a preregistered hard gate. ### C — domain-primary elicitation plus a separate construction-readiness view -Use [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/). Its candidate-specific profile retains domain-primary Coverage and removes construction-readiness checks from ordinary elicitation; its skill composition reuses the domain-primary workpiece and adds a construction-only SDCPN readiness resource. The resulting view cites authoritative workpiece claims under the existing `Construction notes` without reorganizing or duplicating them. This candidate was preregistered here before its wording was authored. +This historical candidate retained domain-primary Coverage and the domain-primary workpiece, removed construction-readiness checks from ordinary elicitation, and added a construction-only SDCPN readiness resource. The resulting view cited authoritative workpiece claims under the existing `Construction notes` without reorganizing or duplicating them. Its exact source is retained at commit `2fb4c779a2`. -**Stage 1: eligible.** +**Eliminated in Stage 2 and removed after owner disposition.** The extra readiness pass added no authored frozen-case distinction, evidence, or oracle; the owner accepted Candidate A as the smaller reversible instrument. ## Shared invariants @@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ A candidate fails this stage if a resource pointer is broken, a workpiece propos ## Stage 2 — owner-led paper walkthrough +The executed walkthrough is recorded in [`evaluation/stage-2-owner-led-paper-walkthrough.md`](evaluation/stage-2-owner-led-paper-walkthrough.md). + Walk every Stage 1-eligible candidate through the same cases without rewriting candidate guidance during the comparison. ### Cases @@ -160,7 +162,7 @@ A parser-accepted or tool-schema-accepted definition is not behavioral success. ## Stage 4 — selected-candidate campaign against the frozen control -Select one candidate through Stages 1–3 before running the Mission 4 campaign. Do not pay to campaign every lightly reasoned variant. +Select one candidate through every applicable comparison stage before running the Mission 4 campaign. Stage 3 is needed only when paper evidence leaves a discriminating behavioral question; this comparison selected Candidate A at Stage 2 and skipped Stage 3. Do not pay to campaign every lightly reasoned variant. Create a new versioned protocol/output location based on `evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v1/`. Preserve its case wall, grader separation, immutable manifests, artifact retention, and three-invocation campaign shape unless a separately accepted protocol decision changes one. Never write into `docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/`. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md index f43a972c721..a441e9efa6a 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ This candidate remaps the current core prompt, SDCPN prompt material, runbook sk 14. A workpiece claim, its evidence, and its epistemic treatment share one authoritative location under the relevant concern. Only unresolved matters spanning concerns or requiring later re-entry enter a compact cross-cutting issue ledger, which references rather than restates claims. 15. Construction evidence is reported at one of three non-collapsible levels: tool-schema acceptance, agent-reviewed structural correspondence, and behavior observed through an actual execution or stronger analysis. Every claim stays within the scope of the method that produced it. 16. [`EVALUATION.md`](EVALUATION.md) owns the repeatable candidate comparison: frozen instruments, authority checks, owner-led walkthroughs, model-facing observables, campaign boundary, and disposition rules. -17. Candidate C keeps ordinary elicitation and its workpiece domain-primary, then applies a construction-only SDCPN readiness view whose entries cite authoritative workpiece claims rather than reproducing them. +17. The paper evaluation selected domain-primary Coverage and its paired workpiece without an additional readiness resource; the separate construction-readiness projection was feasible but not earned by a distinct case, evidence source, or oracle. ## Candidate topology @@ -32,7 +32,8 @@ five-register-synthesis/ ├── SOURCE-MAP.md ├── EVALUATION.md ├── evaluation/ -│ └── stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md +│ ├── stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md +│ └── stage-2-owner-led-paper-walkthrough.md ├── core/ │ ├── SYSTEM.md │ ├── flue.ts.example @@ -45,17 +46,7 @@ five-register-synthesis/ ├── profile.md ├── workpiece-template.md ├── pn-construction.md - ├── checks.md - ├── coverage-alternatives/ - │ ├── domain-primary.md - │ ├── formalism-primary.md - │ └── formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md - └── candidates/ - └── domain-primary-with-readiness/ - ├── README.md - ├── profile.md - ├── sdcpn-readiness.md - └── skill.ts.example + └── checks.md ``` ### Responsibilities @@ -69,9 +60,9 @@ five-register-synthesis/ - [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md) is the recoverable process-model artifact, with operational claims, evidence, and epistemic treatment co-located and a reference-only cross-cutting issue ledger. - [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md) contains construction mappings and patterns disclosed only during construction. - [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md) separates tool-schema acceptance, agent-reviewed structural correspondence, and behavioral execution or stronger analysis before checking fidelity, revision, and delivery. -- [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/) contains Candidate C's complete profile, construction-only readiness resource, and hashable Flue composition while reusing the domain-primary workpiece. - [`EVALUATION.md`](EVALUATION.md) is the sole authority for comparing Coverage/workpiece/readiness candidates and deciding whether finer progressive disclosure is earned. - [`evaluation/stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md`](evaluation/stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md) records the executed mechanical audit, context accounting, hard-gate evidence, and candidate dispositions. +- [`evaluation/stage-2-owner-led-paper-walkthrough.md`](evaluation/stage-2-owner-led-paper-walkthrough.md) records both eligible candidates' traces through all eight frozen cases and the structural recommendation awaiting owner disposition. ## How to read the synthesized set @@ -91,22 +82,21 @@ Read [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelli For elicitation or revision, follow its pointers to: 1. [`core/universal-elicitation.md`](core/universal-elicitation.md) -2. The profile selected by [`EVALUATION.md`](EVALUATION.md): the shared [`profile.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md) for Candidates A and B, or Candidate C's [`profile.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/profile.md) -3. The paired workpiece selected by [`EVALUATION.md`](EVALUATION.md) when it is first created or materially revised: the domain-primary [`workpiece-template.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md) for Candidates A and C, or the [`formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md) alternative for Candidate B +2. The selected domain-primary [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md) +3. Its paired [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md) when the workpiece is first created or materially revised For construction and net delivery, additionally read: -1. Candidate C only: [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/sdcpn-readiness.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/sdcpn-readiness.md) -2. [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md) -3. [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md) +1. [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md) +2. [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md) Workpiece-only delivery uses the universal and plugin Verification registers without disclosing construction resources. ## Evaluation -The shared profile currently uses a domain-typology-primary Coverage index provisionally. Do not decide between it and the alternatives from this README. Follow [`EVALUATION.md`](EVALUATION.md), which preregisters three candidates: domain-primary, formalism-primary, and [`domain-primary elicitation/workpiece organization plus a separate SDCPN construction-readiness view`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/). +[`EVALUATION.md`](EVALUATION.md) compared domain-primary Coverage, formalism-primary Coverage, and domain-primary Coverage plus a separate SDCPN construction-readiness view. [`Stage 1`](evaluation/stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md) eliminated the formalism-primary candidate because its mandatory Coverage resource exposed construction mechanics during ordinary elicitation. [`Stage 2`](evaluation/stage-2-owner-led-paper-walkthrough.md) found no authored distinction or oracle that earned the extra readiness pass, and the owner selected the smaller domain-primary candidate. -The protocol owns the shared invariants, mechanical audit, owner-led cases, model-facing observations, evidence walls, decision rule, and the threshold for splitting progressive resources. [`Stage 1`](evaluation/stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md) leaves Candidates A and C eligible and eliminates Candidate B because its mandatory Coverage resource exposes construction mechanics during ordinary elicitation. No candidate has won. After a candidate wins, remove losing alternatives from the live candidate instrument and preserve only the comparison evidence. +The losing instrument sources were removed after disposition and remain recoverable at commit `2fb4c779a2`. The evaluation evidence remains here. No model-facing candidate comparison or progressive-resource split was earned. ## Observed runtime boundaries diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md index 1774210a629..2658122ecfc 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md @@ -13,14 +13,12 @@ This map accounts for the primary working and draft material used to produce the | `sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md` | Conceptual lifecycle, runtime branches, and packaged-resource routing | Active `sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md`; accepted Mission 3 information hierarchy; predecessor elicitation procedure | | `sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts.example` | Explicit composition of separately authored resources into one Flue skill | Installed Flue `defineSkill` contract; verified core-package → plugin-package → production Flue-app spike | | `sdcpn-modelling/profile.md` | Strictly additive operational-process domain typology and SDCPN profile under five role-pure registers | Active APPEND target material; active `elicitation.md` SDCPN/mixed material; Ciaran outline; current plugin YAML concepts | -| `workpiece-template.md` | Provisional domain-primary recoverable process-model workpiece | Active `ir-template.md`; Mission 4 proof obligations; Ciaran investigation headings | -| `coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md` | Workpiece paired with the formalism-primary Coverage alternative for a fair comparison | Active `ir-template.md`; formalism-primary Coverage candidate; Mission 4 proof obligations | +| `workpiece-template.md` | Selected domain-primary recoverable process-model workpiece | Active `ir-template.md`; Mission 4 proof obligations; Ciaran investigation headings | | `pn-construction.md` | SDCPN mappings, construction patterns, inference, bounded change, and losses | Active `pn-construction.md`; APPEND `Maps To` material; Ciaran transformation patterns | | `checks.md` | Phase-boundary, net, fidelity, revision, and delivery checks | Active `checks.md`; APPEND smells/rabbit holes/failure signatures; current construction tool contract | -| `coverage-alternatives/*` | Concrete comparison at the unresolved Coverage-index fog-line | Active typology table; Ciaran headings; predecessor kind-indexed question reference | -| `candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/*` | Candidate C's domain-primary elicitation profile, construction-only SDCPN readiness projection, and complete skill composition | Preregistered third candidate; shared domain-primary profile/workpiece; construction boundary; workpiece locality rule | | `EVALUATION.md` | Preregistered authority audit, owner-led walkthrough, model-facing comparison, campaign boundary, and disposition rule | Competing-design review; Mission 4 proof and fog-line; `prospective-runbook-v1`; `ir-quality-ruler-v1`; frozen baseline adjudication | | `evaluation/stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md` | Executed candidate manifests, context accounting, structural checks, hard-gate adjudication, and Stage 1 dispositions | `EVALUATION.md`; Candidates A–C at source commit `bc032a4264`; resource/import/register/duplication probes | +| `evaluation/stage-2-owner-led-paper-walkthrough.md` | Eight frozen-case traces, cross-candidate comparison, structural discriminator, and accepted owner disposition | `EVALUATION.md`; Stage 1-eligible Candidates A and C at source commit `2fb4c779a2`; universal/profile/workpiece/construction/check resources | ## Active core system prompt @@ -47,7 +45,7 @@ Source: `packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md`. | Source section | Destination and treatment | | --- | --- | | Plugin job | Condensed into the SDCPN append specialization and profile Directives | -| Typology table | Domain-primary and formalism-primary Coverage candidates; downstream mapping detail moved to construction | +| Typology table | Selected domain-primary Coverage; the eliminated formalism-primary comparison remains recoverable at commit `2fb4c779a2`; downstream mapping detail moved to construction | | Things that look like kinds and are not | Plugin Coverage and construction principles | | Quantity, source-regime, evidence, and precision attributes | Universal authorship/uncertainty plus plugin context/precision Directives and Verification | | Per-kind aspects | Distributed into plugin Coverage; no longer presented as question order | @@ -68,7 +66,7 @@ Sources: `packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/`. The active skill's conceptual lifecycle, `runbook-ir` full-document emission convention, partial delivery, and phase resource routing move to plain `instructions.md`. The candidate requires a final full workpiece emission before construction handoff and workpiece-only delivery. It also distinguishes the current interactive and construct-only runtime branches: construct-only execution reports a re-entry question instead of interviewing. Existing-model revision applies fully to the workpiece and only to net changes supported by mounted mutation capabilities. -The plugin-owned `skill.ts.example` demonstrates Flue's native `defineSkill` to map the instructions, core-owned universal reference, and plugin-owned profile/template/construction/check resources into one packaged skill. Flue synthesizes the packaged `SKILL.md`; no authored duplicate remains. Candidate C supplies its own complete composition example that substitutes a profile without ordinary elicitation readiness checks and advertises a construction-only readiness resource while reusing the shared domain-primary workpiece. +The plugin-owned `skill.ts.example` demonstrates Flue's native `defineSkill` to map the instructions, core-owned universal reference, and plugin-owned profile/template/construction/check resources into one packaged skill. Flue synthesizes the packaged `SKILL.md`; no authored duplicate remains. The eliminated Candidate C composition remains recoverable at commit `2fb4c779a2`; its additional readiness resource was not retained in the selected instrument. ### `elicitation.md` @@ -82,7 +80,7 @@ The active file's Ciaran-derived “What to investigate” headings seed the dom ### `ir-template.md` -The candidate retains a human-readable Markdown workpiece, full `runbook-ir` emission, expert vocabulary, assumptions, unknowns, conflict, omissions, and losses. Each operational claim now owns its exact evidence, normalized account, agent inference, assumption, correction, conflict, or contextual variation locally when those distinctions matter. A compact central ledger holds only unresolved matters spanning concerns or requiring re-entry and references rather than restates authoritative claims. These annotations are structural aids, not mandatory per-statement types. Because Coverage indexing remains unresolved, the workbench contains aligned domain-primary and formalism-primary workpiece candidates under the same locality rule rather than treating one artifact shape as settled. Candidate C reuses the domain-primary workpiece and places a derived reference-only SDCPN view inside its existing `Construction notes`; it does not introduce a second operational account. +The selected candidate retains a human-readable domain-primary Markdown workpiece, full `runbook-ir` emission, expert vocabulary, assumptions, unknowns, conflict, omissions, and losses. Each operational claim owns its exact evidence, normalized account, agent inference, assumption, correction, conflict, or contextual variation locally when those distinctions matter. A compact central ledger holds only unresolved matters spanning concerns or requiring re-entry and references rather than restates authoritative claims. These annotations are structural aids, not mandatory per-statement types. The eliminated formalism-primary workpiece and Candidate C readiness projection remain recoverable at commit `2fb4c779a2`; their comparison and disposition are preserved in the evaluation artifacts. ### `pn-construction.md` @@ -166,7 +164,7 @@ Retained design shape: - adding a question does not require adding a target kind; - operations project from general coverage to a situated question rather than reading a catalogue verbatim. -The predecessor intent-graph kinds and closed ontology are not imported. Its kind-primary organization motivates the formalism-primary Coverage alternative for comparison. +The predecessor intent-graph kinds and closed ontology are not imported. Its kind-primary organization motivated the formalism-primary Coverage alternative evaluated and eliminated in Stage 1. ### Behavioral kernels @@ -202,6 +200,6 @@ The synthesized set does not claim or introduce: - Whether one plugin profile containing both operational-process and SDCPN knowledge becomes too large despite the register structure. - Whether freeform register contents make cross-register routing ambiguous enough to earn a card grammar. - Whether the verified `defineSkill` composition retains its observed resource names, lazy reads, and one-skill behavior when promoted through the repository's actual package exports and built-agent tests. -- Whether domain-primary Coverage hides target obligations or formalism-primary Coverage induces schema-shaped questioning. +- Whether the selected domain-primary Coverage hides target obligations in model-facing execution despite passing the paper comparison. - Whether the workpiece's explicit epistemic homes feel like an unwanted semantic type system. - Whether existing-model analysis/revision remains too weakly specified to support the universal identity claim. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/evaluation/stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/evaluation/stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md index 2d0e16bda6d..d998c4406eb 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/evaluation/stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/evaluation/stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md @@ -92,3 +92,7 @@ The shared checks distinguish tool-schema acceptance, agent-reviewed structural Stage 1 does not choose between A and C. Stage 2 must compare their owner-led case traces, especially whether A's always-visible readiness checks expose target gaps at useful times or whether C's construction-only reference projection preserves operational questioning while surfacing those gaps no later than needed. Progressive-disclosure strain was not established by this audit. Word count alone does not earn another resource split. + +## Post-Stage 2 disposition + +The Stage 1 instruction to retain Candidate B's source applied until final candidate selection. After the owner accepted Candidate A in Stage 2, the B and C instrument sources were removed under the protocol's disposition rule. Their exact evaluated forms remain recoverable at commit `2fb4c779a2`. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/evaluation/stage-2-owner-led-paper-walkthrough.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/evaluation/stage-2-owner-led-paper-walkthrough.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f83d673b36c --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/evaluation/stage-2-owner-led-paper-walkthrough.md @@ -0,0 +1,171 @@ +# Stage 2 — Owner-Led Paper Walkthrough + +**Status: complete; the owner accepted Candidate A as the surviving paper candidate. No model-facing claim is made.** + +- Walkthrough time: `2026-09-01` +- Owner disposition: `2026-09-01` +- Candidate source commit: `2fb4c779a2` +- Eligible candidates: A and C +- Eliminated before this stage: B + +This walkthrough applies the eight frozen cases in [`../EVALUATION.md`](../EVALUATION.md) to the two Stage 1-eligible instruments. Each case description is treated as the only given evidence. The trace does not invent quantities, policies, probabilities, or operational facts to make a candidate look complete. + +The frozen cases state no simulation objective and supply no populated workpiece. The traces therefore compare authored routes conditionally: a distinction is consequential, applicable, or blocking only if a later stated use depends on it. Stage 2 cannot execute Candidate C's projection, observe resource reads, or establish whether a model follows either candidate; those remain model-facing questions. + +Candidates A and C share the universal reference, domain-primary Coverage, workpiece authority structure, construction mappings, and checks. They differ only in readiness placement: A keeps three broad construction-readiness checks in ordinary plugin Verification; C removes those checks and adds a 937-word reference projection after construction is requested. + +## Case 1 — Reusable resource reservation and release + +| Observation | Candidate A | Candidate C | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Signal | Recognize **Contended resource** and **Consumed, reserved, or read input** as hypotheses. The crew may be reusable and unavailable while held; its return state must be confirmed. | Same Recognition path; C's ordinary profile retains both operational shapes unchanged. | +| Next move | Apply **Classify activity inputs** to ask when the crew is acquired, unavailable, and released, and whether it returns changed. Use **Test contention with a borderline case** only if demand can exceed availability. | Same operational-language moves. The readiness view is not loaded and does not frame the question. | +| Coverage | Use **Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources** for crew identity, count, and availability; use **Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use** for each acquisition/use/release relation; let the process spine reference their ordering. Qualification becomes relevant only if later evidence and purpose make it consequential. | Same domain-primary Coverage and filing route. | +| Workpiece authority | Keep crew properties at the participant/resource location and the activity-specific reservation/release claim at the relevant activity. The spine references both rather than restating them. | Same authoritative homes. Later readiness entries cite those locations and carry no crew count, rule, or release fact. | +| Construction boundary | Resource-state representation, acquisition/return structure, and arc semantics remain hidden in `pn-construction.md`. | Same boundary. Before mapping, C adds a cited obligation that the representation preserve unavailability and changed-state return. | +| Readiness | Plugin Verification already checks classification, acquisition, unavailability, release, and count; its broad readiness section also requires reusable-resource occupancy to be recorded before handoff. Shared pre-construction checks repeat the boundary at construction time. | Ordinary Verification retains the same specific resource checks but omits A's three broad readiness bullets. At construction, the readiness view cites resource, activity, and spine locations, then shared checks apply. | +| Verification | **Resource disappearance** repairs back into the activity/input relation. Static net review may report an intended return structure, not conservation. | Same repair and evidence bound. The readiness projection adds navigation but no new resource distinction or oracle. | +| Evidence level | Before construction, only a workpiece claim exists. After construction, report tool acceptance, static correspondence, or scoped behavioral evidence separately. | Same levels. The readiness view is not an evidence level. | + +**Comparison:** Both author an elicitation route for reservation semantics when those semantics bear on the use. C mandates an additional construction-time projection before the same mapping and checks; paper inspection finds no additional resource distinction in that projection, but cannot establish what either candidate would discover in a run. + +## Case 2 — Failure, retry, and recovery + +| Observation | Candidate A | Candidate C | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Signal | Recognize **Failure, retry, and recovery** and possibly **Event rather than step**. Failure may redirect the case and may release, retain, or lose occupied resources. | Same Recognition path. | +| Next move | Apply **Trace disruption and recovery** from failure through work in hand, occupied resources, partial retry, recovery, and terminal outcome. Use a concrete failure story when the ordinary path does not establish the exception. | Same move and user-facing vocabulary. | +| Coverage | File local failure outcomes and resource effects with the affected activities; file the authoritative retry/recovery order in the process spine; keep occurrence quantities only where supported. | Same Coverage and filing. | +| Workpiece authority | The activity owns what failure does locally. The spine owns where retry rejoins or terminates and references the activity/resource claims. One memorable incident remains evidence of mechanism, not rate. | Same authoritative structure. Readiness later cites the failure path rather than paraphrasing it. | +| Construction boundary | Interruptions, alternate paths, recovery transitions, and resource-return structures remain construction choices. | Same boundary; the readiness projection records the recovery and resource obligations before those choices. | +| Readiness | Ordinary Verification names dead spine and resource disappearance as failure signals; broad readiness requires order, enabling conditions, and occupied resources before handoff. | The same specific checks remain in ordinary Verification. C later indexes ordering, recovery, and resource references under construction notes. | +| Verification | Repair a missing retry destination at the process spine and missing release semantics at the activity/input relation. Do not infer failure frequency from the case. | Same repairs. Shared construction checks inspect recovery and enumerated holding paths afterward. | +| Evidence level | A static recovery path is structural correspondence only; runtime progress or non-leakage needs named execution or stronger analysis. | Same evidence boundary. | + +**Comparison:** The domain profile already connects failure, retry, and occupied resources. C makes that connection explicit again at construction without changing gap timing, authority, or evidence. + +## Case 3 — Contextual location + +| Observation | Candidate A | Candidate C | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Signal | Recognize physical location as a possible boundary, eligibility condition, capacity, travel source, state distinction, resource effect, or irrelevant detail—not automatically a Petri-net place. | Same explicit Recognition signal and backstage-formalism directive. | +| Next move | Follow one concrete case through the location and use a contrastive case to ask what changes when the location changes. Stop if no purpose-relevant operational consequence appears. | Same move; no target node is proposed during questioning. | +| Coverage | Put the authoritative location meaning under **Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources**. Activity, time, boundary, or policy sections reference that meaning only when they own a distinct consequence. | Same domain-primary Coverage. | +| Workpiece authority | Record one location claim with its selecting context and evidence. If its effect changes activity duration or eligibility, place that separate proposition at its own concern and reference the location claim rather than repeating it. | Same authority rule. A readiness entry may cite several locations but cannot become a second location account. | +| Construction boundary | Whether the effect becomes state, capacity, guard, parameter, travel delay, or no net structure remains in construction guidance. | Same boundary. C records only which operational distinction a mapping must preserve and defers the concrete representation. | +| Readiness | Ordinary Recognition and Verification already prevent pattern-generated process facts and require target-relevant gaps to remain visible. The construction mapping principle asks for an evidenced operational effect. | C omits the broad target-gap bullet during elicitation but retains the pattern-generated-fact repair. Its readiness lens cites the location effect before the same construction principle applies. | +| Verification | If the interview turns “location” directly into a place, repair by returning to observable operational consequences. If no consequence bears on the objective, omit the distinction. | Same repair. The readiness view cannot promote location into structure. | +| Evidence level | A visible place or parameter later establishes only a reviewed representation, not that the location behavior is correct. | Same evidence boundary. | + +**Comparison:** Neither candidate requires formalism vocabulary in the question. C's reference projection does not resolve a location ambiguity that A's Recognition, Coverage, construction principle, and checks leave unresolved. + +## Case 4 — External event versus internal threshold + +| Observation | Candidate A | Candidate C | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Signal | Recognize both **Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite** and **Threshold on a changing quantity**. Do not assume that all trigger language has the same origin. | Same two hypotheses. | +| Next move | Slice the case to ask what observable event enables work and where it comes from. For the internal quantity, clarify direction, rate, threshold, consequence, and reset only to purpose-relevant depth. | Same operational moves. | +| Coverage | Put external arrivals/events and admission conditions under boundary/triggers; put changing quantity and threshold evidence under time/quantities/stochastic behavior; let the process spine reference both enabling conditions. | Same domain-primary filing. | +| Workpiece authority | The external event claim and internal quantity claim have separate homes because they are separate propositions. The spine references how each enables the relevant activity without copying their details. | Same authority. Readiness later cites both homes. | +| Construction boundary | Source transitions, scenario inputs, guards, dynamics, and crossing-triggered events remain candidate mappings, not elicitation concepts. | Same boundary. C's readiness resource records only boundary and dynamic obligations and explicitly defers where they are represented. | +| Readiness | Recognition and Coverage name event origin, threshold consequence, and reset, so they are available to a purpose-relative elicitation move. Verification checks spine completeness and contextual quantity precision but does not independently demand each of those details. | C retains the same ordinary routes. At construction, separate boundary and continuous-change lenses can cite each concern when applicable; the resource does not require them to be paired. | +| Verification | Repair an unsupported threshold or invented arrival pattern at its authoritative claim. A missing enabling relation repairs at the spine. | Same repairs; shared checks later require parameters/initial populations or explicit external inputs. | +| Evidence level | Static presence of a source or threshold structure is not evidence that arrival or crossing behavior occurs as intended. | Same evidence boundary. | + +**Comparison:** C authors a dedicated construction-time index across the two domain homes, while A leaves construction to consult the same workpiece through mapping guidance and checks. Both require a cold-readable workpiece; paper inspection cannot establish which path avoids transcript archaeology in execution. + +## Case 5 — Directional mode change + +| Observation | Candidate A | Candidate C | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Signal | Recognize **Mode change** and the possibility that A-to-B and B-to-A differ in time, scrap, material, capacity, or downstream sequence. | Same Recognition path. | +| Next move | Apply **Compare both directions of a mode change** and pursue only consequences the operation distinguishes. Use contextual quantity work when values vary by regime. | Same move and stopping rule. | +| Coverage | Keep the mode-change activity and directional consequences under activities/resource use; keep separately supported quantity behavior at the time/quantity concern; reference both from the process spine where sequencing changes. | Same domain-primary Coverage. | +| Workpiece authority | Place each directional proposition once beside its evidence and context. A shared quantity section may own a distribution, but it references rather than restates the directional activity rule. | Same authority structure. Readiness cites both directional homes. | +| Construction boundary | Mode states, directional transitions, and loss structures remain in construction guidance. | Same boundary. C records the obligation to preserve direction but does not choose the factoring. | +| Readiness | Ordinary Verification explicitly requires direction-dependent losses to remain distinct; broad readiness adds no unique mode-change content. | Candidate C retains the same direction-specific Verification check. Its later readiness lens repeats the preservation obligation by reference. | +| Verification | A collapsed symmetric account repairs at the two directional claims. Static review later checks distinct structural losses without claiming runtime exclusivity. | Same repair and evidence wording. | +| Evidence level | Distinct structures can be reviewed against the workpiece; their actual loss behavior requires execution or stronger analysis. | Same levels. | + +**Comparison:** Candidate C authors an additional navigation step for this case. The directional distinction already has explicit ordinary Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification routes in both candidates; whether a model applies them remains unobserved. + +## Case 6 — Hidden waiting + +| Observation | Candidate A | Candidate C | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Signal | Recognize **Hidden waiting** as a possible unavailable input/resource/calendar, release rule, batch, transport, approval, policy, or recovery condition rather than a self-explanatory queue. | Same Recognition path. | +| Next move | Apply **Follow waiting to its enabling condition**: ask what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. | Same move. | +| Coverage | Put the wait episode and enabling relation in the process spine; put the underlying resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, approval, or recovery proposition at its domain concern and reference it from the spine. | Same domain-primary filing. | +| Workpiece authority | The spine owns that the case waits at this point and cites the local cause. It does not duplicate the resource availability or policy rule that explains the wait. | Same single-home arrangement. Readiness cites the spine and cause. | +| Construction boundary | An intermediate place may emerge, but its meaning comes from mapped surrounding conditions. Queue structure is not elicited directly. | Same boundary. C records enabling semantics only and defers structure. | +| Readiness | Ordinary Verification explicitly requires waiting to have an evidenced enabling condition; broad readiness also requires what enables the case. | Candidate C retains the same explicit waiting check. The later readiness ordering lens adds no new operational distinction. | +| Verification | An unsupported queue repairs by returning to the surrounding condition and activity claims. Shared static checks later reject unsupported queue objects. | Same repair and check. | +| Evidence level | A visible waiting place is structural correspondence only; waiting duration or release behavior needs scoped behavioral evidence. | Same boundary. | + +**Comparison:** A authors the same waiting-gap check in ordinary Verification and construction checks. C adds a derived reference entry before the same mapping and static check. + +## Case 7 — Correction versus contextual coexistence + +| Observation | Candidate A | Candidate C | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Signal | Use universal **Tension within or between accounts**. A later difference may be correction, conflict, unnamed context, or source error. | Same universal Recognition; readiness is irrelevant until the active account is settled enough to map. | +| Next move | Apply **State a contradiction without resolving it**, asking whether one replaces the other, both hold under different conditions, or evidence would distinguish them. | Same move. | +| Coverage | Use universal authorship/divergence coverage and the domain policy/context concern where a practiced regime selects among accounts. | Same Coverage. | +| Workpiece authority | A correction updates the authoritative claim and marks what it replaces without leaving both active. Contextual coexistence keeps each account beside its selecting condition. Use the issue ledger when the unresolved relationship affects several claims or needs a later return path. | Same authority. The readiness view may cite only the active/contextual claims and cannot settle the relationship. | +| Construction boundary | Do not compile an unresolved conflict or treat recency as a universal guard. Concrete policy/guard mapping remains behind the construction branch. | Same boundary. C may mark a blocking selection gap but cannot choose a rule. | +| Readiness | Ordinary universal and plugin Verification already check correction, conflict, and contextual regimes. A's broad target-gap bullet can mark an unresolved selection as construction-relevant. | The same epistemic checks remain in C. Its policy readiness lens later cites the unresolved location and routes a re-entry question; only the affected construction path blocks when the gap admits materially different structures. | +| Verification | Repair silent collapse or doubled active correction at the authoritative claim before mapping. After mapping, check that only supported contextual selection appears. | Same repair. The readiness view supplies no additional evidence. | +| Evidence level | A workpiece can preserve unresolved accounts. No net claim that resolves or compiles the disputed relationship is justified until a supported treatment is constructed and checked; unaffected supported structure may proceed. | Same levels. | + +**Comparison:** Both preserve the epistemic distinction before construction. C provides a later reference slot for the gap, but the existing issue ledger, construction notes, and checks already supply that route. + +## Case 8 — Unknown versus unasked + +| Observation | Candidate A | Candidate C | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Signal | Use universal **Silence and absence**: absence alone does not say whether material is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deferred. | Same Recognition. | +| Next move | Apply **Select the smallest consequential absence**. If asked and unavailable, use **Deposit and defer**; if never raised and consequential, keep it visibly unasked and ask only when it outranks the active thread. | Same move during ordinary elicitation. | +| Coverage | Keep the unknown value at its authoritative domain concern with its source and consequence; keep a distinct consequential topic **Not yet asked** at its own home. Do not create person-declared uncertainty from interviewer omission. | Same domain-primary Coverage and annotations. | +| Workpiece authority | Each absence state lives beside the claim or missing concern it qualifies. A cross-cutting ledger entry references several affected claims only when re-entry spans them. | Same authority. The readiness view cites the absent authoritative home; it does not copy the unknown or convert unasked to unknown. | +| Construction boundary | Unknowns, assumptions, and their consequences are already visible in the workpiece. During construction, an unknown may receive a named representational treatment such as a parameter or blocker; it cannot become an assumption without explicit agent authorship. An unasked topic remains an acquisition gap, not a default value. | Same boundary. C's readiness view can record the construction consequence before mapping. | +| Readiness | A's ordinary broad readiness check requires target-relevant gaps to be visible before handoff, while universal Coverage requires consequential unsupported dependencies to remain visible. Shared construction checks instruct the agent to formulate the smallest resolving question when materially different structures remain possible. | C removes only the broad readiness line; universal Coverage retains the same unsupported-dependency contract. Its construction-only view provides a route for recording the material consequence and re-entry question under construction notes before shared checks. | +| Verification | Repair a mislabeled unknown at its authoritative home. If the unasked topic can change structure, route the smallest operational question rather than inventing a value or rule. | Same repair and evidence discipline. | +| Evidence level | Parameterization of an unknown is a visible construction treatment, not evidence of its value. An unasked topic supports no operational claim. | Same evidence boundary. | + +**Comparison:** This is the strongest authored rationale for C: it supplies a dedicated construction-notes location for consequence and re-entry. A nevertheless makes the same distinction available earlier through universal Coverage and Verification, its readiness line, and shared pre-construction checks. Paper inspection establishes placement, not whether either model path notices or routes the gap reliably. + +## Cross-case comparison + +| Criterion | Candidate A | Candidate C | Paper result | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | +| Operational-language questioning | All eight cases route through the same domain Recognition and Operations. | Same; readiness remains construction-only. | Tie; both pass. | +| Single-home workpiece authority | Domain claims stay local; spine, ledger, construction notes, and delivery reference them. | Same; readiness entries are reference-only. | Tie; both pass. | +| Consequential gap timing | The combined Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification registers author a route for every frozen case; broad readiness is visible before construction and shared checks run during construction. | The same case-specific routes remain, minus three broad readiness lines; the detailed projection runs after construction is requested. | A has the earlier authored readiness pointer; actual noticing is unobserved. | +| Construction mechanics in elicitation | None; broad readiness is stated in operational language. | None. | Tie; both pass. | +| Construction navigation | Workpiece → construction guidance → checks. | Workpiece → readiness projection → construction guidance → checks. | A is shallower. | +| Duplicate operational claims | None required. | None required; readiness cites claims. | Tie on authority. | +| Repeated classification effort | Mapping and checks consult authoritative claims directly. | The selected slice is projected through applicable readiness lenses, which may be omitted when irrelevant, before mapping and checks. | C mandates an additional pass; its per-claim effort is unobserved. | +| Context cost | 6,072 ordinary activated words; 2,741 construction-only words. | 6,036 ordinary activated words; 3,678 construction-only words. | C saves 36 ordinary words and adds 937 construction words. | +| Construction fidelity oracle | Shared mapping guidance and three evidence levels. | Same mapping guidance and evidence levels; readiness is not an oracle. | Tie on authored oracle; no fidelity behavior was demonstrated. | +| Unique frozen-case distinction | All eight have an operational elicitation and checking route before construction. | No additional operational or target distinction is authored. | None found for C in the paper instruments. | + +## Structural discriminator + +Candidate C supplies a structurally coherent example of a domain-primary workpiece paired with a separate, reference-only SDCPN readiness view without requiring duplicated authoritative claims or elicitation-time mappings. The paper walkthrough finds no new authored operational distinction or oracle relative to Candidate A: + +- every frozen case has a route through the shared domain Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification material, conditional on a stated use making that route relevant; +- Candidate A's three readiness bullets contain no construction mechanics and are available before a construct-only runtime would have to return a gap; +- shared `checks.md` already contains a detailed pre-construction sufficiency pass; +- Candidate C mandates a projection through applicable lenses before the same mapping and checking resources, without adding evidence or another oracle. + +The instruments do not establish whether C's explicit projection improves model attention enough to outweigh that extra pass. Under the protocol's fallback for a non-dominating comparison, the smaller reversible candidate is A. The 36-word ordinary-context reduction does not offset a 937-word construction resource and another required navigation step on paper alone. This is a topology and reversibility decision, not a behavioral superiority claim. + +## Owner disposition + +- **Candidate A:** selected as the surviving paper candidate. +- **Candidate C:** eliminated; this walkthrough preserves the evidence that the separate readiness view is feasible but not yet earned, while its candidate source remains recoverable at commit `2fb4c779a2`. +- **Candidate B:** remains eliminated from Stage 1; its source remains recoverable at commit `2fb4c779a2`. +- **Stage 3:** skipped. No candidate-comparison runner or paid comparison is justified after accepting the smaller-candidate fallback. If later behavioral evidence reopens the decision, the named discriminating probe is a frozen construct-only workpiece containing one consequential omission among otherwise supported process facts: compare whether the alternatives surface that omission before unsupported mapping, preserve a reference-only re-entry question without transcript archaeology, and avoid unsupported assumptions under the same model, tools, and stop rule. +- **Progressive disclosure:** no further split is earned. A paper walkthrough cannot establish model attention or retrieval strain and supplies no evidence that would meet the protocol's split threshold; word count alone remains insufficient. + +The owner accepted this disposition and authorized removal of the losing alternative instruments. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/README.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/README.md deleted file mode 100644 index b3ca5c1510c..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/README.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,23 +0,0 @@ -# Candidate C — Domain-Primary Account with SDCPN Readiness View - -**Status: non-authoritative evaluation candidate.** Package this candidate alone when comparing it with Candidates A and B. - -## Assembly - -Candidate C reuses the shared system prompts, `instructions.md`, domain-primary `workpiece-template.md`, `pn-construction.md`, and `checks.md`. Its [`skill.ts.example`](skill.ts.example) substitutes this directory's [`profile.md`](profile.md) and adds [`sdcpn-readiness.md`](sdcpn-readiness.md) as a construction-only resource. - -The candidate-specific profile is complete rather than a textual patch so a comparison runner can hash and package its exact model-facing instrument without mutating shared source files. Relative to the shared Candidate A profile, it removes the construction-readiness subsection and frames Coverage and Verification around the operational account needed for the stated simulation use. It retains the same Directives, Recognition, Operations, domain-primary Coverage concerns, and target-specific failure repairs. - -## Separation of responsibility - -- `profile.md` guides operational-process elicitation and workpiece maintenance without imposing SDCPN completeness during ordinary questions. -- The shared `workpiece-template.md` remains the sole operational account and keeps every claim, evidence item, and epistemic treatment at one domain-primary authoritative location. -- `sdcpn-readiness.md` is read only after construction is requested. It projects workpiece references through SDCPN readiness lenses and writes reference-only consequences or gaps into the existing `Construction notes`. -- The shared `pn-construction.md` owns mapping choices and patterns. -- The shared `checks.md` owns tool-schema acceptance, structural comparison, behavioral evidence, fidelity, and delivery checks. - -The readiness view never becomes a second workpiece. If it exposes a missing or changed operational fact, that fact is written at its authoritative workpiece location and only referenced from `Construction notes`. - -## Evaluation boundary - -Evaluate this candidate according to the repository workbench's [`EVALUATION.md`](../../../../EVALUATION.md). Do not infer a win from its separation of elicitation and construction concerns; the paper walkthrough and any authorized model-facing probes must compare whether it exposes consequential target gaps at the right time without duplicating claims or inducing formalism-shaped questions. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/profile.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/profile.md deleted file mode 100644 index e8719b5d442..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/profile.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,213 +0,0 @@ -# Operational-Process / SDCPN Profile - -This profile adds the operational-process domain typology and SDCPN target-formalism concerns that are absent from the universal elicitation reference. It contains no facts about a particular operation. Apply both layers under the same five registers; where this profile is silent, universal guidance still applies. - -The registers are addresses, not a questionnaire or phase sequence. Recognition names operational signals and the hypotheses they support. Operations adapt universal interviewing moves to process modelling. Coverage states what the domain-primary workpiece may need to preserve for the simulation use. Verification detects gaps in the elicited operational account. SDCPN construction readiness and mapping are outside this profile. - -## Directives - -### Model for an explicit simulation use - -Develop an operational account that can support the person's stated simulation question or decision. Establish what may be varied, what response matters, and what observation would make the model credible enough for that use. Detail that cannot affect the stated use does not become necessary merely because the process contains it. - -### Keep formal notation backstage - -Ask about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, and target schemas may guide internal attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions. - -### Preserve distinctions that can change simulated behavior - -Keep entity or activity type, direction, operating regime, calendar, load, resource state, and other selecting conditions when they change what occurs or how a quantity applies. Do not collapse distinct operational contexts into one target parameter for convenience. - -## Recognition - -Recognition entries identify possibilities, not facts or automatic next steps. Confirm the operational meaning before recording it. - -### Language and situation signals - -- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction between types of work or resource. -- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, or uncontrolled boundary input. -- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate an operational constraint, policy, or exception boundary. -- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a threshold, or a mode change. -- **A duration crossing a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may indicate that availability and elapsed work time differ. -- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, or dataset named in passing** may play the role of performer, contended resource, prerequisite, or information source. -- **A physical location** may matter through boundary, capacity, eligibility, travel, state, or resource effects; it does not imply a Petri-net place. -- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what admits or enables work rather than an ordinary step. - -### Recurring operational shapes - -#### Timed work - -A step occupies elapsed time or timing affects the objective. This may require distinguishing an activity from its in-progress interval. - -#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome - -The same activity can produce different outcomes. This may require a deciding condition, observed likelihood, or explicit unknown. - -#### Contended resource - -Several activities want the same limited capability. This may be a reusable resource that becomes unavailable while held rather than an input that is consumed. - -#### Consumed, reserved, or read input - -An activity uses something by transforming it, holding it temporarily, or observing it without making it unavailable. The same thing may play different roles in different activities. - -#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement - -Work moves or is processed as a group whose formation, cohesion, split, or release may affect behavior. - -#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite - -An observable event or condition enables work. It may originate outside the process or be produced by an earlier activity. - -#### Mode change - -Setup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next and may have direction-dependent loss. - -#### Event rather than step - -A failure, interruption, deadline expiry, or unplanned arrival befalls the operation rather than advancing its normal flow. - -#### Threshold on a changing quantity - -A level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other evolving quantity crosses a boundary that changes process behavior. - -#### Policy under pressure - -More than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. The practiced selection rule may differ from the posted rule. - -#### Hidden waiting - -A gap between activities may reflect an unavailable input, resource, calendar, release rule, batch, transport, approval, or recovery condition rather than an independently elicited queue. - -#### Failure, retry, and recovery - -A case can fail to complete, repeat part or all of its work, enter an unhappy path, degrade, or recover. - -## Operations - -Use the universal Operations as the interviewing methods. These moves bind them to operational-process and SDCPN concerns. - -### Choose the case unit - -When several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Use that unit for the first slice. - -### Expose the process spine - -Follow the chosen case from admission to outcome. Ask what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs, and what ends or hands off the case. - -### Link the slice to the simulation objective - -As the case unfolds, ask which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated simulation question depends on. Return to the case when the objective still has no operational support. - -### Sweep one operational relation - -After the slice, choose one objective-relevant relation and examine it across the things already discovered. Useful process sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, type-dependent variation, practiced policy, failure/recovery, and boundary behavior. - -### Classify activity inputs - -For each load-bearing activity/input relation, ask whether the input is transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. For a reserved input, follow when and in what state it returns. - -### Trace disruption and recovery - -For a disruption the person recognizes, follow what happens to the work in hand, the whole case, occupied resources, retry, recovery, and terminal outcome. - -### Test contention with a borderline case - -When demand can exceed a resource's availability, ask about a recent contested or exceptional case to expose the practiced priority, tie-break, override, acquisition, and release behavior. - -### Follow waiting to its enabling condition - -Ask what the case is waiting for and which observable event makes it able to continue. Locate the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or recovery condition. - -### Compare both directions of a mode change - -Ask whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether the loss propagates beyond the local activity. Pursue time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences only where the operation distinguishes them. - -### Surface conservation - -When quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. - -### Anchor validation in an observable comparison - -Ask what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the simulation model credible for its intended question. Do not substitute the person's prediction of the answer for validation of the modeled process. - -## Coverage - -Coverage identifies what the domain-primary workpiece may need for the stated simulation use. It is not a questionnaire, closed ontology, or demand to populate irrelevant sections. - -### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds - -Preserve what the model must answer or compare, what may be varied, what should improve or be avoided, what “better” means, and any trade-off, safety condition, or threshold the person can judge. Record which operational material each objective depends on. Qualitative goals remain qualitative when no supported metric or weight exists. - -### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions - -Preserve what is inside and outside; what enters or leaves; what starts or admits a case; calendars and availability; approvals or instructions; external events; initial populations; and reliability of boundary inputs. - -### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources - -Preserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; consequential carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and the operational effect of location. A resource is a role combining a usable thing with availability, capacity, and contention behavior, not necessarily a separate target kind. - -### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use - -For each consequential activity, preserve its operational name, preconditions, performer, inputs, consumed/reserved/read use, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, occurrence when it is an event, mode-change loss, and variation by type or context. - -### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery - -Preserve activity order, branch and join conditions, interruptions, unhappy paths, retry and recovery behavior, effects on work and occupied resources, and terminal outcomes. Activities without stated order do not yet form a process spine. - -### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior - -Preserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, dependence on type/load/calendar/state, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets. Keep each value at the context and precision its source supports. - -### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes - -Preserve the rule used when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed and practiced accounts, and the context selecting each account. Keep correction, unresolved conflict, and contextual coexistence distinguishable. - -### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings - -Preserve the observation or comparison that would make the model credible, variables a real source might drive, units and update context, who or what is authoritative for missing values, and evidence that is not currently available. Unsupported live bindings and qualitative validation remain workpiece knowledge rather than implied implementation. - -### Cross-cutting simulation qualifiers - -Across the concerns above, preserve only the target-relevant qualifiers not already supplied by the universal reference: entity or activity type, direction, operating regime, calendar, load, resource state, and the context and supported precision of simulation quantities. - -### Concepts that do not imply independent target nodes - -- Waiting is explained by surrounding activities and enabling conditions and may later produce target structure. -- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies. -- A resource combines a usable thing with capacity, availability, and contention behavior. -- A physical location becomes target-relevant only through an operational effect. - -## Verification - -These checks assess whether the elicited operational account preserves the operational meaning needed for its stated simulation use. Universal Verification continues to own authorship, uncertainty, interaction load, generic divergence, and honest stopping. - -### Purpose and spine - -- At least one simulation question, decision, or comparison is stated in the person's terms. -- The account identifies a meaningful process boundary and concrete case. -- The case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, branch conditions where present, and an outcome or handoff. -- Every claimed objective depends on recorded process material or is visibly unsupported. - -### Resources and activity semantics - -- Each load-bearing input is classified as consumed, reserved/released, or read. -- Each objective-relevant contended resource has acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and an honest count or unknown. -- Waiting is associated with an evidenced enabling condition rather than treated as a self-explanatory queue. -- Direction-dependent mode changes retain their distinct losses. - -### Time and contextual variation - -- Each consequential duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains its applicable context and supported precision. -- A point value represents evidenced constancy or a named purpose-relative simplification, not missing variation. -- Prescribed/practiced regimes and other contextual variants remain distinct where they change behavior. - -### Target-specific failure signals and repairs - -- **Unsupported simulation objective:** no process material bears on the question. Return to a concrete case that can expose the dependency. -- **Dead process spine:** activities exist without order, admission, or outcome. Continue the slice at the missing connection. -- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired without release or an explicit terminal loss. Re-enter the activity/input relation. -- **Posted policy compiled as practice:** a document supplies the operative rule without an observed case. Test a contested or exceptional case. -- **Unsupported stochastic precision:** an average or invented distribution replaces consequential variation. Restore the source-supported value and context. -- **Pattern-generated process fact:** a recurring shape supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove the claim or ask whether the shape applies. -- **Formalism-shaped interview:** questions are framed as places, transitions, or arcs. Translate the active gap back into operational events, conditions, things, and consequences. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/sdcpn-readiness.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/sdcpn-readiness.md deleted file mode 100644 index ace8eedbf06..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/sdcpn-readiness.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,89 +0,0 @@ -# SDCPN Construction-Readiness View - -Read this only after construction has been requested and before choosing SDCPN mappings. Read the current domain-primary workpiece first. This view projects authoritative operational knowledge toward construction; it is not another account of the operation, an elicitation checklist, or evidence that a net will behave correctly. - -## Authority and location - -Write the view under the workpiece's existing `Construction notes`. Cite exact workpiece heading paths and compact claim names. Do not copy operational descriptions, values, rules, evidence, or epistemic annotations into the view. The cited operational account remains authoritative. - -Use the view to record only: - -- which workpiece references bear on an applicable SDCPN concern; -- the resulting construction obligation or candidate concern; -- a missing distinction that permits materially different representations; -- an anticipated capability limit or representation loss that mapping must confirm. - -When readiness work reveals a new operational fact, update that fact at its domain-primary authoritative location and leave only a reference here. When it reveals a cross-cutting unresolved matter, use the issue ledger according to its locality rule and reference that entry. A construct-only conversation cannot obtain new expert evidence: record the gap and smallest re-entry question instead. - -## Build the projection - -1. Select the smallest construction slice that bears on the stated simulation use. Reference its objective and authoritative case/process-spine material. -2. Walk the applicable lenses below. For each one, cite the workpiece locations that support a representation, or cite the location that should own a missing fact. -3. Record only the construction obligation, gap, or anticipated loss. Leave operational content at the cited location and defer concrete mappings, inferences, approximations, and defaults to `references/pn-construction.md`. -4. Block only the unsupported path when a missing distinction admits materially different structures. Unrelated supported structure may proceed when the current runtime can construct it safely. -5. Read `references/pn-construction.md` to choose mappings and `references/checks.md` to inspect the result. The readiness view does not replace either resource. - -The projection is complete enough to begin the selected construction slice when every load-bearing construction obligation traces to an authoritative workpiece reference, and every known gap that would materially change that slice is blocking or explicitly routed to re-entry. An inference, approximation, default, capability limit, or loss cannot substitute for a missing operational fact. - -## Readiness lenses - -These are construction addresses, not required headings and not question order. Omit a lens that cannot affect the selected use or slice. - -### Intended use and observable consequence - -Reference the question, comparison, decision, objective dependencies, and validation evidence that select what the net must expose. Record only the corresponding construction scope or a gap in observable support. - -### Flowing cases, carried state, and distinctions - -Reference what flows and any type, context, direction, mode, location, or state distinction that changes behavior. Record which distinctions any representation must preserve without translating every participant or location into an independent node; defer the concrete mapping to the construction resource. - -### Boundary and scenario state - -Reference admission triggers, prerequisites, initial populations, calendars, arrivals, external events, and terminal outcomes. Record what must be available to initialize or drive the selected slice; defer whether it belongs in core net structure, scenario state, or parameters. - -### Activities, events, and occupancy - -Reference consequential activities and events, including preconditions, inputs, outputs, state changes, duration, failure, and what remains occupied while work is in progress. Record whether timing or occupancy must be explicit; do not reproduce the activity account or choose its concrete factoring here. - -### Ordering, enabling, branching, and joining - -Reference the authoritative process spine, branch and join conditions, hidden waiting causes, retries, recovery, and handoffs. Record the enabling, selection, synchronization, or recovery semantics a mapping must preserve, or identify the missing condition that makes them ambiguous. - -### Input and resource semantics - -Reference each load-bearing consumed, reserved/released, or read relation and any capacity, availability, acquisition, changed-state return, contention, or terminal loss. Record the availability and return obligations a mapping must preserve, and flag any reusable resource whose release semantics are absent. - -### Policy and selection - -Reference practiced priorities, tie-breaks, overrides, eligibility, release rules, and the context selecting among them. Record the selection semantics a mapping must preserve. Preserve unsupported or conflicting policy as a gap rather than compiling a convenient rule. - -### Time, stochastic choice, and continuous change - -Reference consequential durations, distributions or qualitative variation, probabilities, rates, thresholds, resets, units, and selecting context. Record which quantitative or dynamic distinctions a mapping must preserve; keep unsupported precision visible as a gap or approximation and defer the concrete representation. - -### Representation and capability limits - -Reference operational material the target or mounted tools may not faithfully carry. Record an anticipated loss and affected objective under `Target-representation losses` for confirmation during mapping; flag unsupported updates or removals rather than assuming an additive workaround. - -## Reference-only shape - -Populate the workpiece's existing `Construction notes` headings with this reference-only shape; do not add a parallel readiness section. Omit empty groups rather than manufacturing content. - -```markdown -## Construction notes - -### Candidate target structures - -- **Selected slice** — references: ; scope: -- **** — references: ; consequence: - -### Questions reopened by construction - -- **** — authoritative home: ; consequence: ; re-entry: - -### Target-representation losses - -- **** — references: ; possible limit: ; consequence: -``` - -This view is a navigation aid, not a score, closed readiness state, duplicated summary, or promise that every target concern has been populated. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/skill.ts.example b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/skill.ts.example deleted file mode 100644 index 052933e7c18..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/candidates/domain-primary-with-readiness/skill.ts.example +++ /dev/null @@ -1,26 +0,0 @@ -import { defineSkill } from "@flue/runtime"; - -import { universalElicitationReference } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent/flue"; - -import checks from "../../checks.md?raw"; -import instructions from "../../instructions.md?raw"; -import pnConstruction from "../../pn-construction.md?raw"; -import workpieceTemplate from "../../workpiece-template.md?raw"; -import profile from "./profile.md?raw"; -import sdcpnReadiness from "./sdcpn-readiness.md?raw"; - -/** Candidate C: domain-primary elicitation with a construction-only readiness projection. */ -export const sdcpnModellingSkill = defineSkill({ - name: "sdcpn-modelling", - description: - "Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct an inspected SDCPN with an explicit evidence level when Petrinaut capabilities are available.", - instructions, - files: { - "references/checks.md": checks, - "references/pn-construction.md": pnConstruction, - "references/profile.md": profile, - "references/sdcpn-readiness.md": sdcpnReadiness, - "references/universal-elicitation.md": universalElicitationReference, - "templates/workpiece.md": workpieceTemplate, - }, -}); diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/domain-primary.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/domain-primary.md deleted file mode 100644 index 2009e307299..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/domain-primary.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,72 +0,0 @@ -# Coverage Alternative — Domain-Typology Primary - -This is a candidate replacement for the plugin profile's **Coverage** register. It organizes attention by how a person describes an operational process while preserving the distinctions downstream SDCPN construction may need. Construction mappings remain in the construction resource. It is reproduced separately to compare navigation at the current fog-line; it is not an additional resource the agent should read alongside `profile.md`. - -## Coverage - -Coverage identifies what the workpiece may need for the stated objective and downstream SDCPN construction. It is not a questionnaire, a closed ontology, or a demand to populate irrelevant sections. - -### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds - -Preserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, or threshold the person can actually judge. An objective needs a traceable dependency on the operational account. Quantitative objectives may need metrics; qualitative objectives must not be forced into invented weights. - -Keep qualitative goals and trade-offs in the workpiece when the person cannot support a numerical measure. Construction guidance owns the later choice of target representation. - -### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions - -Preserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and reliability of boundary inputs. Distinguish a trigger from an ordinary activity and a prerequisite from a resource that the activity consumes. - -These concerns define the operational starting and enabling context. Construction guidance owns how that context is represented. - -### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources - -Preserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations affect behavior. A resource is a domain-facing role, not necessarily a separate target kind: its instances may be represented as typed elements subject to policy, capacity, and availability. - -A physical location deserves target representation only when the operation treats being there as consequential. Construction guidance owns the representational choice. - -### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use - -For each consequential activity, preserve its name in operational vocabulary, preconditions, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed/reserved/read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, occurrence if it is an event, mode-change loss, and variation by type or context. - -### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery - -Preserve the order activities occur, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery behavior, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes. Activities without stated order do not yet form a constructible process spine. - -### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior - -Preserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, dependence on type/load/calendar/state, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets. Keep unsupported precision broad or parameterized rather than manufacturing a distribution. - -### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes - -Preserve the rule applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds. Determine whether divergence is correction, unresolved conflict, or contextual coexistence. - -Construction later determines which rules are representable. Political judgment, unnamed exceptions, and unsupported conditions remain workpiece-only and must appear as losses rather than invented logic. - -### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings - -Preserve how the person would know the model is credible for its intended question, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, who or what is authoritative for missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable. - -Live data connections and qualitative validation may remain unsupported by the current target tooling; preserve them in the workpiece rather than implying implementation. - -### Cross-cutting evidence and uncertainty - -For every consequential concern, preserve the person's exact evidence where wording matters; normalized account; agent inference; assumption with reason and check; unknown, unasked, declined, or deferred material; unresolved conflict; correction; contextual variation; omission; and known target loss as applicable. These are workpiece obligations, not mandatory labels on every sentence. - -### Things not independently elicited as target nodes - -- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by the activities and conditions around it and may emerge as target structure during construction. -- A scenario is assembled for simulation from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies; it is not necessarily one elicited process element. -- A resource is an operational role that may combine entity distinctions, capacity, availability, and policy rather than requiring one universal target node shape. -- A location is operational context until its effect on state, eligibility, travel, capacity, boundary, or resource use is established. - -## What this shape makes easy - -- Finding material in the vocabulary a process expert is likely to use. -- Filing Ciaran's goals, triggers, actors, locations, resources, steps, and failure/recovery concerns without first translating them into target kinds. -- Keeping consumed/reserved/read semantics and the process spine close to the account that supplies them. - -## What this shape makes harder - -- Seeing whether every target-formalism concept needed for construction has an explicit home. -- Distinguishing one domain concern that maps to several target concepts. -- Using target kinds directly as the index for formalism-specific completion checks. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md deleted file mode 100644 index e34e6771379..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary-workpiece-template.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,134 +0,0 @@ -# Formalism-Primary Workpiece Template Alternative - -This workpiece candidate pairs with [`formalism-primary.md`](formalism-primary.md). It exists to compare Coverage indexing fairly; do not load it alongside the domain-primary `../workpiece-template.md` in one run. - -It is structurally organized but not a closed semantic claim system. Follow the person's thread during the conversation; do not read these headings aloud as a questionnaire. - -## Locality rule - -Every operational claim has one authoritative home under the relevant target concern. Keep exact expert wording, normalized interpretation, agent inference, uncertainty, assumptions, corrections, conflicts, and contextual variation beside that claim when those distinctions matter. Do not repeat the claim in a centralized evidence section or ledger. - -Labels such as **Expert evidence**, **Working account**, **Agent inference**, **Assumed**, **Unknown**, **Not yet asked**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, **Conflict**, **Correction**, **Contextual variation**, **Omitted**, and **Loss** are optional annotations, not mandatory fields or a closed type system. An assumption states why it was introduced and how it could be checked. A correction identifies the account it replaces without leaving both active. Contextual coexistence keeps each account beside the condition selecting it. - -Use the cross-cutting issue ledger only when an unresolved matter affects several authoritative claims or needs a later return path. Ledger entries reference those claims; they do not summarize them again. - -Whenever this workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit the full latest document again before a construction handoff and before workpiece-only delivery. - -```markdown -# Process-Model Workpiece - -## Purpose and posture - -### Who will use the model and how - -### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation - -### Available time and assumption appetite - -### What the result must not claim - -## Target-relevant operational account - -These concepts are filing and checking addresses, not interview order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose; keep consequential unsupported material visible. Place each operational claim once and attach evidence or epistemic annotations at that location when needed. - -### Objectives - -For each objective: what the model must answer, compare, or support, and references to the operational material on which it depends. - -### Entity distinctions - -What flows, performs work, is contended, or carries state, including actors, resources, and consequential location distinctions. - -### Boundary conditions - -Initial state and populations, arrivals and departures, calendars, external inputs and events, admission triggers, and prerequisites outside the process. - -### Activities - -Named operational activities with preconditions, performers, inputs, consumed/reserved/read use, outputs, state changes, duration, success, failure, and contextual variation. Put local activity meaning here; put order in Ordering flow. - -### Ordering flow and authoritative case spine - -Give the cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary: what admits a concrete case, which named activities occur and in what order, how branches and joins are decided, where waiting comes from, how failure/retry/recovery change the path, and what outcome or handoff ends it. Reference Activity and Entity entries instead of restating their local details. - -#### Primary case: - -##### Trigger or admission - -##### Ordered account and references - -##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes - -##### Objective dependencies - -#### Additional or contrasting case: - -Add only when a different case exposes structure the primary case does not. - -### Policies - -Practiced decision and contention rules, prescribed alternatives, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, and contextual regimes. - -### Constraints - -Capacity, eligibility, compatibility, qualification, safety, conservation, and thresholds with their operational consequences. - -### Metrics - -What is measured, how it is observed, what better means, and supported trade-offs or priorities. - -### Dynamics - -Quantities that change while no discrete event occurs: direction, rate, variation, threshold, consequence, and reset. - -### Data bindings - -Variables a real data source could drive, their source, units, update behavior, and evidence gap. Do not claim a live binding unless one exists. - -### Validation criteria - -Observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment that would make the model credible enough for its intended use. - -## Cross-cutting issue ledger - -Use only for an unresolved matter that affects several target concerns or needs later re-entry. In one compact entry, reference the authoritative claim locations, state what remains unresolved and what it prevents, and name the evidence or event that would re-enter it. Do not copy the affected claims here. - -- **** — affects: ; unresolved: ; consequence: ; re-enter when: . - -## Construction notes - -Open this section when construction begins; do not use it to script ordinary elicitation. Reference authoritative workpiece claims rather than reproducing them. - -### Candidate target structures - -### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults - -### Questions reopened by construction - -### Target-representation losses - -## Delivery status - -Summarize status by reference to the authoritative account and issue ledger; do not create a second model summary. - -### What this workpiece currently supports - -### Consequential gaps - -### Net status - -State whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or tool-schema accepted; whether the inspected definition was structurally reviewed against the workpiece; and whether behavior was untested, observed in named simulations, or established to a stated scope by stronger analysis. Do not infer a higher level from a lower one. -``` - -## Maintenance guidance - -- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions even when filing them under target concerns. -- Update the claim at its authoritative location when understanding changes; do not append a competing summary elsewhere. -- Keep evidence and epistemic treatment local even when a cross-cutting issue references the claim. -- Update the authoritative ordering-flow section when case behavior changes; reference local activity and entity claims rather than repeating them. -- Empty sections may be removed when irrelevant. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, or **Omitted** only when that state itself matters to later work. -- Construction consumes this workpiece. If construction needs transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that point. - -## Comparison pressure - -This shape makes target obligations and formalism-indexed verification easy to find. It may also make the workpiece feel like a schema and may force actors, locations, resources, triggers, and process failures to be translated across several headings. Compare whether that translation burden is lower or higher than the domain-primary candidate's risk of hiding target distinctions. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary.md deleted file mode 100644 index ccde09ef8b7..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/coverage-alternatives/formalism-primary.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,119 +0,0 @@ -# Coverage Alternative — Target-Formalism Primary - -This is a candidate replacement for the plugin profile's **Coverage** register. It organizes attention by distinctions the SDCPN-oriented workpiece and construction path may need, while treating Ciaran's goals, triggers, actors, locations, resources, steps, and process failures as domain-typology perspectives that can map across several concepts. It is for comparison at the current fog-line, not an additional resource the agent should read alongside `profile.md`. - -## Coverage - -Coverage identifies target-relevant information the workpiece may need for the stated purpose. The concepts are filing and checking addresses, not a questionnaire, a closed capture ontology, or an instruction to create one node of each kind. - -### Objective - -Preserve what the model must answer, compare, or help decide; who will use the answer; what may be varied; what should improve or be avoided; relevant priorities or trade-offs; and what would make the answer credible enough. Connect each objective to the operational material it depends on or mark it unsupported. - -Ciaran's goals, safety conditions, importance, and desired/tolerated thresholds enter here, while their concrete measures and limits may also enter Metric or Constraint. - -### Entity distinction - -Preserve kinds of things the operation treats differently: what flows, what performs work, what is contended, and what state or properties change behavior. Include population shape, availability, qualification, compatibility, location effect, and whether distinctions vary across contexts. - -Ciaran's actors, resources, work items, and some locations enter here. “Resource” is a role an entity plays; it also invokes Policy, Constraint, Boundary Condition, and Activity coverage. - -Possible SDCPN consequences include colour sets, typed elements, resource tokens, and type-dependent parameters. - -### Boundary condition - -Preserve initial populations and state, arrivals and departures, calendars, external inputs and events, source reliability, admission triggers, prerequisites outside the process, and the chosen process boundary and horizon. - -Ciaran's scheduled, received, threshold, and event triggers may enter here when they originate outside the normal flow; internal triggers may instead belong to Ordering Flow, Policy, Dynamics, or Activity. - -Possible SDCPN consequences include scenario state, parameters, source transitions, and guards. - -### Activity - -Preserve what happens in operational vocabulary: preconditions, performer, inputs, whether each is consumed/reserved/read, outputs and state changes, duration, event occurrence, success and failure, recovery, mode-change loss, and dependence on type or context. - -Ciaran's steps and operational failure questions enter primarily here. A step may require several target structures during construction; Coverage does not assume one activity equals one transition. - -Possible SDCPN consequences include factored start/progress/finish transitions, intermediate places, resource arcs, timing, and typed outcomes. - -### Ordering flow - -Preserve sequence, concurrency, branching, joining, enabling triggers, loops, retry, recovery, terminal outcomes, and the conditions that choose among paths. Activities without explicit relation do not yet form a process spine. - -Ciaran's unhappy paths, retry of part or all of a process, and “what happens next” questions enter here together with Activity and Policy. - -Possible SDCPN consequences include arcs, arc types, exclusive branches, loops, and recovery paths. - -### Policy - -Preserve the rule used when more than one thing could happen or more than one claimant wants a capability: practiced priority, tie-breaking, release, override authority, prescribed alternatives, and contextual regimes. Distinguish correction, unresolved conflict, and conditions under which several accounts coexist. - -Ciaran's approvals, decision responsibility, and some goals or avoidance rules may enter here when they decide behavior rather than merely evaluate it. - -Possible SDCPN consequences include guards and priorities. Unsupported political or tacit judgment remains workpiece-only. - -### Constraint - -Preserve capacity, eligibility, compatibility, qualification, conservation, safety or regulatory limits, thresholds, and what happens when a limit is reached. A stated bound without operational consequence may be contextual rather than constructible. - -Ciaran's caps, essentially-infinite resources, safety conditions, and quantities to keep above or below enter here. - -Possible SDCPN consequences include capacities, guards, invariants checked over state, and explicit loss when no current projection exists. - -### Metric - -Preserve what is measured, how it is computed or observed, what “better” means, relevant typical or tail behavior, and any trade-off the person actually uses. Do not force qualitative objectives into invented weights. - -Ciaran's measures, importance, desired probabilities, and thresholds may enter here together with Objective and Constraint. - -Possible SDCPN consequences include scalar functions over simulation state and post-run comparisons; qualitative judgments may remain outside the net. - -### Dynamics - -Preserve quantities that change continuously while no discrete event occurs: direction and rate, variation, dependence on state, consequential threshold, triggered event, reset, and interaction among several changing components. - -Ciaran's threshold triggers and time-varying resource properties may enter here when the change is continuous rather than an arrival or ordinary activity. - -Possible SDCPN consequences include differential equations on real-valued elements, guards, and transitions triggered by crossings. - -### Data binding - -Preserve the model variable, real source or feed, units, update behavior, reliability, and the evidence gap the binding would close. Stop before implementation detail unless the stated purpose depends on it. - -Ciaran's note about drawing timings from event datasets enters here as a prospective binding, not evidence that such a connection exists. - -Current construction may retain data bindings only in the workpiece and loss report. - -### Validation criterion - -Preserve the observation, replay, historical comparison, expert judgment, or acceptance conversation that would establish that the model is credible enough for its intended use. Do not ask the person to predict the model's answer and store that prediction as structure. - -Ciaran's process goals and measures inform validation, but validation remains distinct from the behavior being modeled. - -### Cross-cutting quantity, evidence, and context - -Any concept may carry duration, rate, probability, count, capacity, or threshold; applicable entity or operating context; prescribed and practiced regimes; source and supported precision; exact expert evidence; normalization; agent inference; assumption; unknown, unasked, declined, or deferred state; conflict; correction; contextual coexistence; omission; and target loss. - -These are workpiece obligations where consequential, not mandatory fields on every statement. - -### Domain perspectives that are not automatically target concepts - -- **Actor:** may perform an Activity, decide a Policy, supply evidence, or be an Entity distinction. -- **Location:** may affect Boundary Condition, Entity state, Activity duration, Constraint, eligibility, or travel; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. -- **Resource:** combines an Entity distinction with availability, capacity, acquisition/release Activities, and contention Policy. -- **Trigger:** may be a Boundary Condition, Ordering Flow condition, Policy, Dynamics threshold, or Activity outcome. -- **Process failure:** may be an Activity outcome, event, alternative Ordering Flow, retry loop, Constraint violation, or terminal result. -- **Queue or waiting:** is explained by surrounding conditions and may emerge as construction structure rather than an independently elicited concept. -- **Scenario:** is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time. - -## What this shape makes easy - -- Seeing whether every distinction the target construction path may need has an explicit attention and checking address. -- Letting universal slice and sweep operations route directly to formalism-relevant Coverage concepts. -- Keeping target ontology, workpiece sufficiency, and construction consequences aligned. - -## What this shape makes harder - -- Finding material using the broad categories a process expert or colleague may naturally supply. -- Avoiding schema-shaped questioning when the formalism concepts are prominent. -- Representing actors, locations, resources, triggers, and failures that intentionally cross several target concepts without repeatedly translating them. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md index aded4f7ee7f..b68bfdd5494 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Before substantive elicitation or revision, read both references: Both use the same additive registers: **Directives**, **Recognition**, **Operations**, **Coverage**, and **Verification**. Universal guidance applies first. Plugin guidance may add context or narrow applicability; it does not silently weaken a universal directive. Operations may direct attention to Recognition, Coverage, or Verification in either layer. -Read `templates/workpiece.md` when creating or substantially revising the workpiece. When preparing to construct, read `references/sdcpn-readiness.md` first if that resource is advertised, then read `references/pn-construction.md` and `references/checks.md`. Keep these construction resources outside ordinary elicitation. +Read `templates/workpiece.md` when creating or substantially revising the workpiece. Read `references/pn-construction.md` and `references/checks.md` only when preparing to construct, constructing, or checking a net. ## Runtime branches @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ Whenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in Construct only from a recoverable workpiece. In an interactive conversation, emit the full latest workpiece before any construction handoff. In a construct-only conversation, treat the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Read the construction and checks resources before beginning. If mounted Petrinaut tools are available, use them for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting net JSON. If the necessary tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes. -When a construction-readiness view is available, project authoritative workpiece references into the existing `Construction notes` before choosing mappings. Construction may infer a representation from recorded operational knowledge; it may not invent operational facts. Name inferences, approximations, defaults, and losses. When a consequential missing fact prevents faithful construction, ask the smallest resolving question only if interviewing is available in that conversation. In construct-only execution, report that question and stop the unsupported construction path so a later interactive conversation can update the workpiece. +Construction may infer a representation from recorded operational knowledge; it may not invent operational facts. Name inferences, approximations, defaults, and losses. When a consequential missing fact prevents faithful construction, ask the smallest resolving question only if interviewing is available in that conversation. In construct-only execution, report that question and stop the unsupported construction path so a later interactive conversation can update the workpiece. ### Check and deliver From a255878fe2d52e03eed6e2d18c7b5b0739fc7b8b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 17:48:55 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 033/101] Archive Mission 4 at branch transition Co-authored-by: Cursor --- ...wner-led-runbook-and-workpiece-redesign.md | 113 ++++++++++++++++++ .../docs/mission-archive/README.md | 12 +- 2 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-archive/4-owner-led-runbook-and-workpiece-redesign.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-archive/4-owner-led-runbook-and-workpiece-redesign.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-archive/4-owner-led-runbook-and-workpiece-redesign.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..404fbfd15e1 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-archive/4-owner-led-runbook-and-workpiece-redesign.md @@ -0,0 +1,113 @@ +# Mission 4 — owner-led runbook and workpiece redesign + +## Status + +Closed for mission transition on 2026-09-01 by owner direction before Mission 8 was cut. This archive preserves the execution contract for [FE-1563](https://linear.app/hash/issue/FE-1563/redesign-the-elicitation-runbook-and-workpiece-against-the-frozen); the deployment cut makes no independent claim that every proof item below passed. Mission 3's frozen prospective campaign is the immutable control: one invalid runtime member, two valid independently graded workpieces, and an adjudicated range recorded in [`docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md`](../evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md). Its observed artifacts and source revision `b738aa1be1a62a9f9cdde89ced78558f04293a77` remain the exact instrument of record; current source may be relocated, but no relocated branch-tip file may be represented as the frozen v1 instrument. + +Later projection, provenance, bounded revision, observer, host-continuity, and optimisation concerns remain in [`MISSION.next.md`](../../MISSION.next.md). They are not implementation authority here. + +### Accepted design decision — Markdown prompt authority and core source topology + +**Observed strain:** a growing generic system prompt would be awkward as a TypeScript literal, while the core package's flat `src/` mixed active evidence contracts, suspended conversation/interpretation/teaching machinery, and plugin SDK declarations. **Local obligation:** keep one authoritative production prompt in `src/SYSTEM.md`, keep temporary prompt-shaping material outside `src/`, and group implementation by the authority that causes it to change without changing public package exports or runtime behavior. **Owner acceptance:** the owner approved the Markdown prompt migration, temporary browseable workbench, and authority-based core topology before implementation. The workbench is non-authoritative and must be deleted or moved into a versioned evaluation protocol when shaping is complete. + +### Accepted design decision — Flue-native package ownership + +**Observed strain:** the app-local `ChatAgent` mixed the core Brunch prompt, SDCPN steering and runbook resources, SDCPN construction tools, Petrinaut host tools, and transport conventions, making none of their package authorities visible. **Local obligation:** follow Flue's native distinction between the agent's returned core instructions, `useInstruction` contributions, progressively disclosed `useSkill` resources, and `useTool` capabilities while exposing core and SDCPN ownership directly. **Alternatives:** preserving a substrate-neutral core would have kept agent composition in `binding-flue`, contrary to the intended split; making core and plugin Flue-native keeps the app as the required directive-marked registration and host composition point. **Owner acceptance:** the owner explicitly selected the Flue-native core/plugin alternative before implementation, then clarified that core must remain deployable in any context and for any output formalism: SDCPN and Petrinaut model-facing identity, guidance, and tools belong to plugin-sdcpn, while browser execution and transport remain app-owned. This decision relocates the existing instrument without changing its runbook semantics and does not reactivate the generalized repertoire/`useElicitation()` runtime. + +### Accepted design decision — plugins pair a domain typology with a target formalism + +**Observed strain:** the formalism-only plugin definition left the reusable operational-process typology with no honest owner, even though SDCPN Recognition, Coverage, Operations, and Verification depend on both that subject-matter typology and the target representation. **Local obligation:** make each plugin carry one reusable domain typology / target formalism pairing while preserving the boundary between reusable typology and concrete user domain. **Alternatives:** keeping plugins formalism-only would scatter domain-typology guidance into core or the app; making plugins per concrete domain would bake scenario nouns into reusable teaching. **Owner acceptance:** the owner selected the paired plugin model. `plugin-sdcpn` carries operational processes plus SDCPN; `plugin-gherkin` carries software behavior plus Gherkin. Concrete operations, organizations, situations, and scenarios remain conversation/workpiece content, never plugin units. + +## Imperative + +Manually reshape the technically viable Mission 3 elicitation runbook and Markdown workpiece into a stronger, research-informed candidate that the owner understands and endorses one consequential decision at a time. + +Use the completed research synthesis, historical workpieces, owner-supplied edge cases, and frozen prospective baseline as evidence rather than treating any one source as a specification. The mission should expose where the current package's teaching order, question dosage, epistemic treatment, phase boundaries, or workpiece structure strain under real modelling, make the least structural change that answers each observed strain, and establish the gains, regressions, and remaining uncertainty of the resulting candidate against the frozen control. + +This is not an autonomous rewrite and not a statistical claim of universal superiority. The design conversation and manual walkthroughs are part of the work: the owner expects remodeling itself to reveal consequential corner cases that an agent-generated replacement would miss. + +## Throughline + +One stepwise redesign through the production core-agent and SDCPN-plugin package seam: + +```text +research synthesis + historical workpieces + current authored resources +→ owner and agent inspect one observed strain or edge case +→ agree the local obligation and smallest structural or teaching change +→ manually revise the one-skill runbook/workpiece package +→ walk known and owner-supplied cases through that revision +→ repeat only at the new fog-line +→ freeze a versioned candidate instrument +→ run it through the production Flue ChatAgent +→ grade the recovered workpiece with the frozen ruler +→ compare candidate evidence with Mission 3's frozen control +``` + +The semantic edit surface is the SDCPN plugin's existing modelling skill: `SKILL.md`, `elicitation.md`, `ir-template.md`, and only the construction/check material whose phase ownership is directly implicated. Brunch core owns the stable Flue agent prompt; plugin-sdcpn owns its additional prompt material, runbook skill, and target-specific tools; the app owns only the directive-marked registration point and Petrinaut host composition. Amend the structural-typing specification only when an accepted redesign decision contradicts it. Keep changes reviewable in small semantic steps rather than replacing the package wholesale. + +The baseline is available as a comparison input, not a design prescription. Its observed range and dispositions must be considered before the candidate instrument is frozen or any improvement claim is made. Candidate runs use a new versioned protocol/output location and preserve their own instrument manifest; they never write into or modify the baseline campaign. + +## Proof + +This proof establishes that the owner-led redesign produces a coherent candidate runbook/workpiece package with inspectable evidence of its effects. It does not establish projection, provenance, observer consolidation, scoped net revision, comprehensive domain semantics, or final demo readiness. + +Observe all of the following: + +1. Each consequential redesign has a recorded observed strain or edge case, the local obligation it answers, the alternatives considered where material, and owner acceptance before implementation. +2. The package remains one real Flue skill with progressive disclosure. Ordinary elicitation stays in operational vocabulary; IR headings, SDCPN structures, and construction schemas do not become an opening questionnaire. +3. The workpiece gives an authoritative, cold-readable home to the objective and process spine; expert evidence; agent inference; assumptions with reason and how-to-check; unknown, unasked, declined, deferred, and conflicting material where present; corrections or contextual coexistence; and construction-opened losses without laundering authorship. +4. Concrete walkthroughs exercise at least opening overload, policy versus practice, contextual quantities, scarce-resource reservation/release, hidden waiting, directional loss, correction versus contextual coexistence, and genuine unknown versus not-yet-asked. Owner-supplied cases may deepen this set. +5. One frozen candidate version runs through the production Flue `ChatAgent` and emits a recoverable workpiece. Its run artifacts record the exact candidate instrument and remain separate from the Mission 3 baseline. +6. Independent omniscient and cold review with the frozen ruler identifies gains, regressions, disagreements, and new mistakes relative to the control. A human adjudication states what the evidence supports without collapsing baseline variation to one mean score. +7. The resulting candidate is sufficient to prepare the prebuilt FE-1476 workpiece or explicitly names the smallest remaining workpiece gap. No projection success is inferred from workpiece quality. + +Prefer one coherent candidate and a discriminating comparison over many lightly reasoned variants. A fluent interview or attractive template by itself is not proof. + +## Constraints + +- Preserve the Mission 3 prospective baseline artifacts unchanged and treat source revision `b738aa1be1a62a9f9cdde89ced78558f04293a77` as the committed v1 instrument. Current source may move without compatibility wrappers; candidate runs must record the relocated files under a new versioned campaign and may not write into the v1 output location. +- Treat the authoritative elicitation research synthesis as evidence and decision support, not a backlog to implement wholesale. Shared-source repetition is not independent corroboration. +- The owner leads semantic and editorial choices. The agent presents alternatives, traces consequences, edits accepted decisions, and runs probes; it does not infer approval or silently choose the final package. +- Work one observed strain or owner-supplied edge at a time. Prefer subtraction, relocation, and clearer authority before adding another catalog, abstraction, or artifact. +- Keep universal elicitation, SDCPN investigation, workpiece structure, and PN construction distinct enough that each can change without turning questions into schema slots. +- Preserve one model-facing agent, one runbook skill, Flue's native returned instructions, `useInstruction`, `useSkill`, `useTool`, resource disclosure, and the production `ChatAgent` door. Do not add a loader, workflow engine, second agent, or TUI. +- Do not add a comprehensive ontology, closed claim kinds, typed completion algebra, generalized plugin/repertoire runtime, observer fold, projection engine, capture-store join, or live Petrinaut mutation path. The statically composed Flue-native core and SDCPN package contributions are the production path, not a reactivation of generalized `useElicitation()`. +- Preserve exact expert evidence and honest authorship. Normalized prose, agent assumptions, unasked material, and explicit user unknowns remain distinguishable. +- Do not tune reusable guidance only to Vestera. Scenario facts and owner examples may test the package but do not enter reusable teaching as universal facts. +- Keep construction outside ordinary elicitation. Move construction-owned material only when the redesign can observe the effect; do not broaden into Mission 5's provider-schema problem. +- Update affected Petrinaut user-facing documentation only if this mission changes user-visible behavior in Petrinaut packages; internal runbook resource edits alone do not create that obligation. + +## Fog-line + +Do not design the whole candidate before resolving these questions with the owner at the affected resource: + +- Whether the first useful change is teaching order/dosage, workpiece structure, authorship/epistemic treatment, or a smaller combination. +- Whether broad headings survive, collapse into a case/process spine plus epistemic ledger, or become objective slices with supporting cases. Versioned assertion clusters are not the default. +- Whether question batching guidance belongs in always-on routing, the skill body, or elicitation resources, and whether the prospective control replicates historical opening overload. +- How much `Transform to PN` guidance should leave elicitation and whether projection losses should open only during construction. +- How to represent correction, contextual coexistence, declined/deferred material, and directional/context-dependent values without mandatory per-statement semantic typing. +- Which duplicate summaries can be removed only after one authoritative home is demonstrated. +- The smallest candidate campaign that can reveal regression given baseline variance without pretending one scenario proves universal superiority. +- Whether a manually discovered edge belongs in reusable guidance, a probe/grader catalog, the workpiece shape, or mission evidence only. + +Resolve each at the smallest real or paper boundary and record the decision before continuing. A longer fog-line after a walkthrough is calibration, not failure. + +## Stop or reorient + +Stop and surface the evidence if: + +- the redesign edits or overwrites the frozen baseline artifacts, case, graders, ruler, or source revision, or presents relocated current source as the v1 instrument; +- the agent produces a wholesale replacement before the owner works through its consequential choices; +- headings or typologies become a scripted intake form or dictate the interview's opening order; +- uncertainty is handled by inventing more mandatory fields rather than preserving it honestly; +- normalized agent prose is presented as verbatim expert evidence or never-asked material becomes a user-declared unknown; +- concrete Vestera or owner-supplied facts leak into reusable teaching; +- construction, projection, provenance, observer scheduling, capture folding, or live net mutation expands into this mission because a later mission may need it; +- a candidate is called better from fluency, parser shape, aesthetics, or one favorable anecdote without the frozen comparison ruler and explicit regressions; +- the redesign requires restoring Condition 5's foreground `brunch_ask`, typed extraction/fold, completion accounting, or minute-scale ordinary turns. + +A need for one stronger structural distinction is not permission to rebuild the retired typed kernel. Name the exact ambiguity and test the least mechanism that could resolve it. + +## Deferred + +Mission 5 owns the first workpiece-to-live-SDCPN projection and evidence-backed provenance answer. Mission 6 owns bounded reviewer re-elicitation and scoped net patching. Mission 7 owns the complete six-beat rehearsal and optimisation handoff. The inferential observer remains an optional spike rather than this mission's workpiece mechanism. Host/session continuity, compaction, voice, broad observability, simulated-conversation viewing, and remote release remain in `MISSION.next.md` unless this mission's real throughline exposes a direct blocker. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-archive/README.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-archive/README.md index abdf8c67d2f..e49040eb656 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-archive/README.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-archive/README.md @@ -1,10 +1,8 @@ # Closed missions -Accepted `MISSION.md` files, moved here on close. Evidence of what was proven, not execution -authority. The next-concerns draft and cut rule live in the context-root -[`AGENTS.md`](../../AGENTS.md). +Closed `MISSION.md` files, moved here on close or explicit owner-directed branch transition. Each file's status states what was accepted, falsified, or left unadjudicated. These are historical contracts and evidence records, not execution authority. The next-concerns draft and cut rule live in the context-root [`AGENTS.md`](../../AGENTS.md). -- [`1-bare-petrinaut-flue-chat.md`](1-bare-petrinaut-flue-chat.md) — Mission 1, accepted - 2026-08-27. -- [`2-mechanical-capture-sweep.md`](2-mechanical-capture-sweep.md) — Mission 2, accepted - 2026-08-27. +- [`1-bare-petrinaut-flue-chat.md`](1-bare-petrinaut-flue-chat.md) — Mission 1, accepted 2026-08-27. +- [`2-mechanical-capture-sweep.md`](2-mechanical-capture-sweep.md) — Mission 2, accepted 2026-08-27. +- [`3-structurally-typed-runbook-to-headless-pn.md`](3-structurally-typed-runbook-to-headless-pn.md) — Mission 3, closed 2026-08-31 with the runbook/workpiece path accepted and real-model construction falsified on the exercised route. +- [`4-owner-led-runbook-and-workpiece-redesign.md`](4-owner-led-runbook-and-workpiece-redesign.md) — Mission 4, closed for branch transition by owner direction on 2026-09-01; this archive does not independently adjudicate every proof item. From c10c3597b42a4001c4e1a7ed89d1be179e002e5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 09:25:33 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 034/101] Record Flue skill composition evidence --- libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md | 6 +- .../comparison.md | 78 + .../manifest.json | 78 + .../runs/hermetic/independent-S1.json | 2855 ++++++++++++ .../runs/hermetic/independent-S2.json | 2978 +++++++++++++ .../runs/hermetic/independent-S3.json | 2995 +++++++++++++ .../runs/hermetic/independent-S4.json | 2905 ++++++++++++ .../runs/hermetic/independent-missing-S5.json | 2078 +++++++++ .../runs/hermetic/packaged-S1.json | 2935 +++++++++++++ .../runs/hermetic/packaged-S2.json | 2963 +++++++++++++ .../runs/hermetic/packaged-S3.json | 2963 +++++++++++++ .../runs/hermetic/packaged-S4.json | 2965 +++++++++++++ .../runs/paid/independent-S1.json | 1882 ++++++++ .../runs/paid/packaged-S1.json | 1764 ++++++++ .../comparison.md | 98 + .../manifest.json | 82 + .../runs/hermetic/independent-S1.json | 2858 ++++++++++++ .../runs/hermetic/independent-S2.json | 3000 +++++++++++++ .../runs/hermetic/independent-S3.json | 2983 +++++++++++++ .../runs/hermetic/independent-S4.json | 2859 ++++++++++++ .../runs/hermetic/packaged-S1.json | 2970 +++++++++++++ .../runs/hermetic/packaged-S2.json | 2983 +++++++++++++ .../runs/hermetic/packaged-S3.json | 2966 +++++++++++++ .../runs/hermetic/packaged-S4.json | 2968 +++++++++++++ .../runs/paid/independent-S1-r1.json | 1734 ++++++++ .../runs/paid/independent-S4-r1.json | 956 ++++ .../runs/paid/packaged-S1-r1.json | 3336 ++++++++++++++ .../runs/paid/packaged-S4-r1.json | 971 ++++ .../comparison.md | 87 + .../manifest.json | 149 + .../runs/hermetic/independent-S1.json | 2876 ++++++++++++ .../runs/hermetic/independent-S2.json | 2978 +++++++++++++ .../runs/hermetic/independent-S3.json | 3029 +++++++++++++ .../runs/hermetic/independent-S4.json | 2937 +++++++++++++ .../runs/hermetic/packaged-S1.json | 2986 +++++++++++++ .../runs/hermetic/packaged-S2.json | 3012 +++++++++++++ .../runs/hermetic/packaged-S3.json | 2982 +++++++++++++ .../runs/hermetic/packaged-S4.json | 2997 +++++++++++++ .../runs/paid/S1-independent-r1.json | 1798 ++++++++ .../runs/paid/S1-independent-r2.json | 1770 ++++++++ .../runs/paid/S1-independent-r3.json | 1737 ++++++++ .../runs/paid/S1-packaged-r1.json | 3343 ++++++++++++++ .../runs/paid/S1-packaged-r2.json | 3475 +++++++++++++++ .../runs/paid/S1-packaged-r3.json | 1754 ++++++++ .../runs/paid/S2-independent-r1.json | 3740 ++++++++++++++++ .../runs/paid/S2-independent-r2.json | 2416 ++++++++++ .../runs/paid/S2-packaged-r1.json | 3230 ++++++++++++++ .../runs/paid/S2-packaged-r2.json | 3891 +++++++++++++++++ .../runs/paid/S3-independent-r1.json | 2024 +++++++++ .../runs/paid/S3-independent-r2.json | 3004 +++++++++++++ .../runs/paid/S3-packaged-r1.json | 1053 +++++ .../runs/paid/S3-packaged-r2.json | 3147 +++++++++++++ .../runs/paid/S4-independent-r1.json | 1036 +++++ .../runs/paid/S4-packaged-r1.json | 1177 +++++ .../scenarios.json | 32 + .../scenarios.json | 32 + .../flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md | 56 + .../flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md | 42 + .../protocol.md | 103 + .../protocol.md | 88 + .../protocol.md | 82 + 61 files changed, 123271 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/comparison.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/manifest.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/independent-S1.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/independent-S2.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/independent-S3.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/independent-S4.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/independent-missing-S5.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/packaged-S1.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/packaged-S2.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/packaged-S3.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/packaged-S4.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/paid/independent-S1.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/paid/packaged-S1.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/comparison.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/manifest.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/hermetic/independent-S1.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/hermetic/independent-S2.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/hermetic/independent-S3.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/hermetic/independent-S4.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/hermetic/packaged-S1.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/hermetic/packaged-S2.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/hermetic/packaged-S3.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/hermetic/packaged-S4.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/paid/independent-S1-r1.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/paid/independent-S4-r1.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/paid/packaged-S1-r1.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/paid/packaged-S4-r1.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/comparison.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/manifest.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/hermetic/independent-S1.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/hermetic/independent-S2.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/hermetic/independent-S3.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/hermetic/independent-S4.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/hermetic/packaged-S1.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/hermetic/packaged-S2.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/hermetic/packaged-S3.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/hermetic/packaged-S4.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S1-independent-r1.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S1-independent-r2.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S1-independent-r3.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S1-packaged-r1.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S1-packaged-r2.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S1-packaged-r3.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S2-independent-r1.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S2-independent-r2.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S2-packaged-r1.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S2-packaged-r2.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S3-independent-r1.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S3-independent-r2.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S3-packaged-r1.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S3-packaged-r2.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S4-independent-r1.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S4-packaged-r1.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/scenarios.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/scenarios.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/protocol.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/protocol.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/protocol.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md index 366036112cd..ea5a8e6c8cd 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md @@ -821,7 +821,11 @@ Not missions. ## Ownership and teaching mechanism -One real Flue skill remains the teaching mechanism. Do not grow a skill catalog. A concise always-on instruction routes to the skill; its body carries lifecycle procedure and its supporting resources disclose elicitation teaching, the workpiece, PN construction, and checks as needed. Flue `useSkill` is not always-on `useInstruction`, and runbook teaching may incorporate repertoire content without restoring the core YAML runtime or plugin keys. +Mission 4 selects one mounted plugin job skill with core-authored universal elicitation packaged as a lazy supporting resource. This is a runtime packaging decision, not a transfer of semantic authority: core remains the single authored home for context-, domain-, editor-, and output-formalism-independent elicitation judgment; plugin job skills package that source beside their own domain-typology / target-formalism resources. A concise core prompt and an earned plugin append carry mounted-lifetime invariants; the job skill carries procedures and judgment and discloses resources as needed. Flue `useSkill` is not always-on `useInstruction`. + +The Flue composition side quest compared that topology with a separately mounted core `elicitation` skill through three frozen instruments. V3 removed the legacy-core-prompt confound and repeated the discriminating opening case: after `sdcpn-modelling` activation, independent elicitation activated in 0/3 Candidate A runs while packaged universal plus SDCPN disclosure completed in 2/3 Candidate B runs. Both candidates correctly avoided universal disclosure across all four construct-only and resolvable-review restraint runs. The only revised knowledge-gap review pair bypassed the shared job skill in both candidates, so v3 did not behaviorally validate B across jobs; it exposed review routing as Mission 4 content work. The architecture disposition is therefore: select packaged B for current production because A exhibits repeated topology-specific activation strain, while preserving the evaluation’s narrower invalid/both-weak protocol verdict. Do not mount A or run a fourth topology campaign by momentum. Independent skill identity may re-enter if a second real plugin or changed model/framework behavior demonstrates reliable cross-skill activation or material duplication/context strain. + +Evidence: [`docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/comparison.md`](docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/comparison.md), with immutable v1/v2/v3 manifests and raw traces beside it. Ownership boundaries: diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/comparison.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/comparison.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3fd842060e5 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/comparison.md @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ +# Flue skill-composition side-quest comparison + +## Outcome + +**Invalid or inconclusive.** Candidate A remains mechanically viable, but this probe did not +establish behavioral viability or preference for either topology. The current production model +failed the shared plugin instruction before the candidate-specific disclosure paths could be +compared reliably. + +No production promotion or Mission 4 reorientation is warranted from this evidence. + +## What the hermetic probe established + +All nine faux-provider runs crossed the built production `ChatAgent` composition seam. + +- Candidate A's initial catalog contained `sdcpn-modelling` and `elicitation`; Candidate B's + contained only `sdcpn-modelling`. +- A could activate both skills and read the plugin's SDCPN resource. +- B could activate the plugin and read byte-identical universal content as a supporting resource. +- S1 and S4 acquired universal content through their candidate-specific paths. +- S2 and S3 acquired neither the independent capability nor the packaged universal resource. +- The selected universal instructions had the same SHA-256 + (`a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716`) in both + candidates. +- Normalizing the one routing sentence made the plugin instruction bodies byte-identical. +- S5's attempted activation returned a successful tool result containing: + `Skill "elicitation" is not available. Available skills: sdcpn-modelling.` + The faux turn could continue, so the missing capability is an explicit soft failure rather than + a fatal runtime error. + +This evidence proves mounting, access, observability, and absence of hidden universal content. It +does not prove model judgment. + +## Paid mechanism smoke + +The smoke stopped after the two S1 runs because their two model calls each reached the +four-model-invocation ceiling. Both runs also exhibited the same shared failure. S2 was not run: +the budget was exhausted, and the side quest separately requires paid evaluation to stop when a +shared-content defect makes the comparison non-discriminating. + +| Dimension | Candidate A — independent | Candidate B — packaged | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Job routing | Pass: activated `sdcpn-modelling` | Pass: activated `sdcpn-modelling` | +| Capability routing | Fail: did not activate `elicitation` although it was in the initial catalog | Fail: did not read `universal-elicitation.md` although the activated skill advertised it | +| Universal judgment | Fail: asked four orientation questions as a batch | Fail: asked five orientation questions as a batch | +| Plugin judgment | Pass: questions stayed in approval-process purpose, scope, and operational concerns | Fail: although mostly process-grounded, one question exposed Petri-net familiarity instead of staying in operational vocabulary | +| Composition | Fail: universal content never entered context, so the action could not compose both bodies of judgment | Fail for the same reason | +| Restraint | Indeterminate: S2 was not run | Indeterminate: S2 was not run | +| Disclosure | Pass: raw trace shows `sdcpn-modelling` only | Pass: raw trace shows `sdcpn-modelling` only | +| Evidence honesty | Pass: no approval-process facts or completed construction were invented | Pass: no approval-process facts or completed construction were invented | +| Failure clarity | Pass in hermetic S5: missing `elicitation` was explicit and actionable | Indeterminate: not applicable to B | +| Model calls | 2 | 2 | +| Input / output tokens | 3,506 / 560 | 3,454 / 528 | +| Cache write tokens | 4,732 | 4,694 | +| Total tokens | 8,798 | 8,676 | +| Model latency | 7,028 ms | 5,893 ms | +| Provider cost | USD 0.012221 | USD 0.0119615 | + +Combined paid activity: 2 scenario runs, 4 provider calls, 17,474 total tokens, 12,921 ms summed +model latency, and USD 0.0241825. This reached the model-invocation ceiling and remained below the +USD 1.00 ceiling. + +## Interpretation + +The independent topology was not mechanically falsified: Flue mounted it, advertised it, activated +it under a prescribed faux path, and exposed a clear missing-capability result. The real model's +failure to activate it cannot be attributed specifically to independent mounting because the same +model also ignored Candidate B's packaged resource instruction and the shared +`sdcpn-elicitation.md` read. + +The observed strain is therefore upstream of the topology comparison: after activating the shared +job skill, the current model answered directly instead of performing either required progressive +disclosure route. Post-hoc wording changes are forbidden in this probe, and expanding the campaign +would not repair that confound. + +The bounded conclusion is to retain the current Mission 4 authority and production default. A new +probe would need a separately authorized, frozen shared-content revision or another discriminating +mechanism; this side quest supplies no warrant to choose A or B. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/manifest.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/manifest.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fca69115f0e --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/manifest.json @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ +{ + "sideQuestId": "flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1", + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "sourceState": "dirty side-quest instrument; every instrument file is content-addressed below", + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "runtime": { + "boundary": "built production ChatAgent loaded from apps/brunch-agent/dist/app.mjs", + "flue": "2.0.3", + "hermeticProvider": "@earendil-works/pi-ai faux provider 0.83.0", + "constructionToolsMounted": false, + "stop": "first consequential question, finding, or construction decision" + }, + "candidateRenderedText": { + "independentPluginActivation": "runs/hermetic/independent-S1.json#/toolCalls/0/output", + "independentElicitationActivation": "runs/hermetic/independent-S1.json#/toolCalls/1/output", + "packagedPluginActivation": "runs/hermetic/packaged-S1.json#/toolCalls/0/output", + "packagedUniversalResource": "runs/hermetic/packaged-S1.json#/toolCalls/1/output" + }, + "sourceSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "82356eb4e0aab1634c21d96a36e834394fe9987e7445a26b84c6fd1c497763ab", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "df514bda6fbedcbcf09b8bd8b148716cb8a3297293a8cd4e18ec47e566c46b62", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "a67aa0c87bdc8e72c0bcbbe4cad603ed264809957b56b9c0ccef4032ae08cf0e", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "21bf274423e833c1e4a4af5f747978a4c3c3db2815da973a4894c8e72dba88de", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/scenarios.json": "10e5b6897319045485a33e556d1de05241cbdbe9ddf5e8fa6c72ef73199252c1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/protocol.md": "476984da4bd65f21717dff1c450a82e86017ef0652b03b778c0691e585aabf0a", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md": "c16d5faaa7a450a41d6888dd6d2b3eac88e4687779b0c8f8e6fe4eceeeb241c6", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "b4959142f10c74e9b04a5d0c0dfb3b74dbab8c492a26e34d2c2c8ff9e3eb7cfa" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "a4b0261917a6627172e83b87f31142fb905758a8a7f7a7f000781c1fba880f34", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "63adaa3aa89e11862add6537e33c87fdb548bd058c7dac54fa67a5a28cc20b3c", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A adds the mechanically required elicitation skill name and activation-cue description." + ] + }, + "hermeticRuns": [ + "runs/hermetic/independent-S1.json", + "runs/hermetic/packaged-S1.json", + "runs/hermetic/independent-S2.json", + "runs/hermetic/packaged-S2.json", + "runs/hermetic/independent-S3.json", + "runs/hermetic/packaged-S3.json", + "runs/hermetic/independent-S4.json", + "runs/hermetic/packaged-S4.json", + "runs/hermetic/independent-missing-S5.json" + ], + "paidRuns": ["runs/paid/independent-S1.json", "runs/paid/packaged-S1.json"], + "paidBudget": { + "plannedScenarioRuns": 4, + "completedScenarioRuns": 2, + "authorizedModelInvocations": 4, + "completedModelInvocations": 4, + "authorizedUsd": 1, + "observedUsd": 0.0241825, + "stopReason": "The two S1 runs reached the four-model-invocation ceiling. Both also ignored the required universal disclosure and produced opening questionnaires, so a shared-content failure made further topology comparison non-discriminating." + }, + "artifactFieldNotes": { + "activatedSkills": "This raw-run field records activate_skill attempts. A successful activation requires an output that begins with the requested skill instructions; S5's missing elicitation attempt is not a disclosure." + }, + "outcome": "invalid-or-inconclusive" +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/independent-S1.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/independent-S1.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2e30daaeb3e --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/independent-S1.json @@ -0,0 +1,2855 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-independent-s1-d2b7c1bc", + "phase": "hermetic", + "candidate": "independent", + "scenarioId": "S1", + "scenario": { + "title": "Underspecified interactive request", + "prompt": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "stopAfter": "The first consequential question.", + "expected": "Ask one high-yield question in operational vocabulary after loading universal and SDCPN elicitation judgment." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling", "elicitation"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling", "elicitation"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "elicitation" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [ + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "sha256": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf" + } + ], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 4, + "inputTokens": 2963, + "outputTokens": 11, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 2963, + "totalTokens": 5937, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3, + "inputTokens": 1814, + "outputTokens": 10, + "cacheReadTokens": 2248, + "cacheWriteTokens": 1814, + "totalTokens": 5886, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 2, + "inputTokens": 4349, + "outputTokens": 30, + "cacheReadTokens": 3346, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4349, + "totalTokens": 12074, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 4, + "inputTokens": 4895, + "outputTokens": 32, + "cacheReadTokens": 6979, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16801, + "cost": 0 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 13, + "inputTokens": 14021, + "outputTokens": 83, + "cacheReadTokens": 12573, + "cacheWriteTokens": 14021, + "totalTokens": 40698, + "cost": 0 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nHelp me model our approval process as an SDCPN.\n\n## Assistant\nWhat decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?\n- tool activate_skill (activate-sdcpn): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\\n\"\n- tool activate_skill (activate-elicitation): \"Run the skill named \\\"elicitation\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\\n\\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\\n\\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Work from purpose\\n\\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\\n\\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\\n\\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\\n\\n### Follow the person's account\\n\\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\\n\\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\\n\\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\\n\\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\\n\\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\\n\\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\\n\\n### Treat divergence as information\\n\\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\\n\\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\\n\\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\\n\\n### Stop honestly\\n\\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\\n\\n### Vague or compressed language\\n\\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\\n\\n### Normative language\\n\\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\\n\\n### Tension within or between accounts\\n\\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\\n\\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\\n\\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\\n\\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\\n\\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\\n\\n### Diminishing yield\\n\\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\\n\\n### Assent without independent wording\\n\\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\\n\\n### Silence and absence\\n\\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\\n\\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\\n\\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\\n\\n### Slice a concrete case\\n\\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\\n\\n### Sweep one property\\n\\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\\n\\n### Ask for the last occurrence\\n\\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\\n\\n### Ask for the basis\\n\\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\\n\\n### Ground a term or artifact\\n\\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\\n\\n### Clarify until observable\\n\\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\\n\\n### Use contrastive cases\\n\\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\\n\\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\\n\\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\\n\\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\\n\\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\\n\\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\\n\\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\\n\\n### Restate for correction\\n\\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\\n\\n### Propose structure for correction\\n\\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\\n\\n### Deposit and defer\\n\\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\\n\\n### Press without trapping\\n\\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\\n\\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\\n\\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\\n\\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\\n\\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\\n\\n### Trade concrete outcomes\\n\\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\\n\\n### Close with one correction opportunity\\n\\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\\n\\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\\n\\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\\n\\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\\n\\n### Before asking\\n\\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\\n\\n### Before recording\\n\\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\\n\\n### Before closing\\n\\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-sdcpn-elicitation.md): \"# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\\n\\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\\n\\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\\n\\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\\n\\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\\n\\n### Keep target structure backstage\\n\\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\\n\\n### Preserve operational context\\n\\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\\n\\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\\n\\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\\n\\n### Language and account signals\\n\\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\\n\\n### Operational situation patterns\\n\\n#### Timed work\\n\\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\\n\\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\\n\\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\\n\\n#### Contended resource\\n\\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\\n\\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\\n\\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\\n\\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\\n\\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\\n\\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\\n\\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\\n\\n#### Mode change\\n\\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\\n\\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\\n\\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\\n\\n#### Spatial transfer\\n\\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\\n\\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\\n\\n#### Policy under pressure\\n\\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\\n\\n#### Hidden waiting\\n\\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\\n\\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\\n\\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\\n\\n### Link the slice to the objective\\n\\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\\n\\n### Expose the process spine\\n\\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\\n\\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\\n\\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\\n\\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\\n\\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\\n\\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\\n\\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\\n\\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\\n\\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\\n\\n### Close a resource account\\n\\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\\n\\n### Close a mode change in both directions\\n\\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\\n\\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\\n\\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\\n\\n### Ask what is conserved\\n\\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\\n\\n### Establish retry scope\\n\\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\\n\\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\\n\\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\\n\\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\\n\\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\\n\\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\\n\\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\\n\\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\\n\\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\\n\\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\\n\\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\\n\\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\\n\\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\\n\\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\\n\\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\\n\\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\\n\\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\\n\\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\\n\\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\\n\\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\\n\\n### Purpose and process\\n\\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\\n\\n### Operational semantics\\n\\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\\n\\n### Quantities and context\\n\\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000024", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFFVDBaQk1NWldDNzJRN1hTR1Y1WkNH", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1ET0ZCSPGMAMNS87N7BW3QH", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZCRY4J5AM67JSASN1HK", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 4 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "elicitation" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n", + "durationMs": 3 + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1ET0ZBN94JVN93GDANBPGF2" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.102Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.106Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.130Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.135Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZCRY4J5AM67JSASN1HK", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.136Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZCRY4J5AM67JSASN1HK", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277193915:t7u8ciyska8", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.136Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277193915:t7u8ciyska8", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2963, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2963, + "totalTokens": 5937, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277193915 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZCRY4J5AM67JSASN1HK", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.138Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\":\"sdcpn-m", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZCRY4J5AM67JSASN1HK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.138Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "odelling\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZCRY4J5AM67JSASN1HK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.139Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZCRY4J5AM67JSASN1HK", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277193915:t7u8ciyska8", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2963, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2963, + "totalTokens": 5937, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.140Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277193915:t7u8ciyska8", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2963, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2963, + "totalTokens": 5937, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277193915 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZCRY4J5AM67JSASN1HK", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.140Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZCRY4J5AM67JSASN1HK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.143Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277194145 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZCRY4J5AM67JSASN1HK", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.145Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277194145 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZCRY4J5AM67JSASN1HK", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.145Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 4, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZCRY4J5AM67JSASN1HK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.146Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZCRY4J5AM67JSASN1HK", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277193915:t7u8ciyska8", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2963, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2963, + "totalTokens": 5937, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277193915 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277194145 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.146Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZD45S7JG99C0DHZDVN3", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.148Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZD45S7JG99C0DHZDVN3", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277193915:t7u8ciyska8", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.148Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277193915:t7u8ciyska8", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1814, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 2248, + "cacheWrite": 1814, + "totalTokens": 5886, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277193915 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZD45S7JG99C0DHZDVN3", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.150Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\":\"elicitation", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZD45S7JG99C0DHZDVN3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.150Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZD45S7JG99C0DHZDVN3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.150Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZD45S7JG99C0DHZDVN3", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277193915:t7u8ciyska8", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 1814, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 2248, + "cacheWrite": 1814, + "totalTokens": 5886, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.151Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277193915:t7u8ciyska8", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1814, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 2248, + "cacheWrite": 1814, + "totalTokens": 5886, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277193915 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZD45S7JG99C0DHZDVN3", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.151Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZD45S7JG99C0DHZDVN3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.152Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277194153 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZD45S7JG99C0DHZDVN3", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.153Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277194153 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZD45S7JG99C0DHZDVN3", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.153Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + } + }, + "durationMs": 2, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZD45S7JG99C0DHZDVN3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.155Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZD45S7JG99C0DHZDVN3", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277193915:t7u8ciyska8", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1814, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 2248, + "cacheWrite": 1814, + "totalTokens": 5886, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277193915 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277194153 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.155Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZDCMVFMMGSYPKJ1JKWP", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.156Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZDCMVFMMGSYPKJ1JKWP", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277193915:t7u8ciyska8", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.156Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277193915:t7u8ciyska8", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4349, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3346, + "cacheWrite": 4349, + "totalTokens": 12074, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277194156 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZDCMVFMMGSYPKJ1JKWP", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.157Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.flue/pack", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZDCMVFMMGSYPKJ1JKWP", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.157Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "aged-skills/skil", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZDCMVFMMGSYPKJ1JKWP", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.157Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "l%3Asdcpn-mo", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZDCMVFMMGSYPKJ1JKWP", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.157Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "delling%3A2d0cdf44c8", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZDCMVFMMGSYPKJ1JKWP", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.157Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "4d68c9/sdcpn-elicita", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZDCMVFMMGSYPKJ1JKWP", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.158Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "tion.md\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZDCMVFMMGSYPKJ1JKWP", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.158Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZDCMVFMMGSYPKJ1JKWP", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 2, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277193915:t7u8ciyska8", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 4349, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3346, + "cacheWrite": 4349, + "totalTokens": 12074, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.158Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277193915:t7u8ciyska8", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4349, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3346, + "cacheWrite": 4349, + "totalTokens": 12074, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277194156 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZDCMVFMMGSYPKJ1JKWP", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.158Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZDCMVFMMGSYPKJ1JKWP", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.159Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277194161 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZDCMVFMMGSYPKJ1JKWP", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.161Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277194161 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZDCMVFMMGSYPKJ1JKWP", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.161Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + } + }, + "durationMs": 3, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZDCMVFMMGSYPKJ1JKWP", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.162Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZDCMVFMMGSYPKJ1JKWP", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277193915:t7u8ciyska8", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4349, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3346, + "cacheWrite": 4349, + "totalTokens": 12074, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277194156 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277194161 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.163Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZDMPTVYT8VRKAAXMZF3", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.164Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZDMPTVYT8VRKAAXMZF3", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277193915:t7u8ciyska8", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.164Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277193915:t7u8ciyska8", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 32, + "cacheRead": 6979, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16801, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277193915 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZDMPTVYT8VRKAAXMZF3", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.165Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "What decision should", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZDMPTVYT8VRKAAXMZF3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.167Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " this model ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZDMPTVYT8VRKAAXMZF3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.168Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "support, and can you", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZDMPTVYT8VRKAAXMZF3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.168Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " walk me thr", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZDMPTVYT8VRKAAXMZF3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.168Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ough the las", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZDMPTVYT8VRKAAXMZF3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.168Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "t approval r", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZDMPTVYT8VRKAAXMZF3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.168Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "equest from subm", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZDMPTVYT8VRKAAXMZF3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.168Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ission to its outcom", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZDMPTVYT8VRKAAXMZF3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.168Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "e?", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZDMPTVYT8VRKAAXMZF3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.168Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZDMPTVYT8VRKAAXMZF3", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277193915:t7u8ciyska8", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?" + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 32, + "cacheRead": 6979, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16801, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.168Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277193915:t7u8ciyska8", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 32, + "cacheRead": 6979, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16801, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277193915 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZDMPTVYT8VRKAAXMZF3", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.168Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZDMPTVYT8VRKAAXMZF3", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277193915:t7u8ciyska8", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 32, + "cacheRead": 6979, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16801, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277193915 + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 57, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.170Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277193915:t7u8ciyska8", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2963, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2963, + "totalTokens": 5937, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277193915 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277194145 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277193915:t7u8ciyska8", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1814, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 2248, + "cacheWrite": 1814, + "totalTokens": 5886, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277193915 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277194153 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277193915:t7u8ciyska8", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4349, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3346, + "cacheWrite": 4349, + "totalTokens": 12074, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277194156 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277194161 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277193915:t7u8ciyska8", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 32, + "cacheRead": 6979, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16801, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277193915 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 58, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.170Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 41, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 59, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.171Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZBQ21GJ1DQ0CWYM2RH5", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZCJHJXD7RV0MQPC2MW4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 60, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.171Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZBMMZWC72Q7XSGV5ZCG", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "fc92a4a6be9ed1df11f891755a6537f90fbc6ce36aec38ae546f1d6708a11db4", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 61, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.171Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "82356eb4e0aab1634c21d96a36e834394fe9987e7445a26b84c6fd1c497763ab", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "df514bda6fbedcbcf09b8bd8b148716cb8a3297293a8cd4e18ec47e566c46b62", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "a67aa0c87bdc8e72c0bcbbe4cad603ed264809957b56b9c0ccef4032ae08cf0e", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "21bf274423e833c1e4a4af5f747978a4c3c3db2815da973a4894c8e72dba88de", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/scenarios.json": "10e5b6897319045485a33e556d1de05241cbdbe9ddf5e8fa6c72ef73199252c1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/protocol.md": "476984da4bd65f21717dff1c450a82e86017ef0652b03b778c0691e585aabf0a", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md": "c16d5faaa7a450a41d6888dd6d2b3eac88e4687779b0c8f8e6fe4eceeeb241c6", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "b4959142f10c74e9b04a5d0c0dfb3b74dbab8c492a26e34d2c2c8ff9e3eb7cfa" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "a4b0261917a6627172e83b87f31142fb905758a8a7f7a7f000781c1fba880f34", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "63adaa3aa89e11862add6537e33c87fdb548bd058c7dac54fa67a5a28cc20b3c", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/independent-S2.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/independent-S2.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..579f1282b73 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/independent-S2.json @@ -0,0 +1,2978 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-independent-s2-bfa44eda", + "phase": "hermetic", + "candidate": "independent", + "scenarioId": "S2", + "scenario": { + "title": "Adequate construct-only request", + "prompt": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them.", + "stopAfter": "The first consequential construction decision.", + "expected": "Enter construction guidance without loading universal elicitation or asking a question." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome.", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling", "elicitation"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md" + }, + "output": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md" + }, + "output": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [ + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md", + "sha256": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694" + }, + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md", + "sha256": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5" + } + ], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 5, + "inputTokens": 3252, + "outputTokens": 11, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 3252, + "totalTokens": 6515, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3, + "inputTokens": 1814, + "outputTokens": 29, + "cacheReadTokens": 2537, + "cacheWriteTokens": 1814, + "totalTokens": 6194, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3, + "inputTokens": 3142, + "outputTokens": 27, + "cacheReadTokens": 3635, + "cacheWriteTokens": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9946, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 5, + "inputTokens": 2000, + "outputTokens": 46, + "cacheReadTokens": 6061, + "cacheWriteTokens": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10107, + "cost": 0 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 16, + "inputTokens": 10208, + "outputTokens": 113, + "cacheReadTokens": 12233, + "cacheWriteTokens": 10208, + "totalTokens": 32762, + "cost": 0 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nUse the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them.\n\n## Assistant\nFirst, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome.\n- tool activate_skill (activate-sdcpn): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-pn-construction.md): \"# SDCPN Construction\\n\\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\\n\\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\\n\\n## Construction boundary\\n\\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\\n\\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\\n\\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\\n\\n## Mapping principles\\n\\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\\n| --- | --- |\\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\\n\\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\\n\\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\\n\\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\\n\\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\\n\\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\\n\\n## Construction patterns\\n\\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\\n\\n### Timed work\\n\\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\\n\\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\\n\\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\\n\\n### Contended resource\\n\\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\\n\\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\\n\\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\\n\\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\\n\\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\\n\\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\\n\\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\\n\\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\\n\\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\\n\\n### Mode change\\n\\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\\n\\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\\n\\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\\n\\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\\n\\n### Spatial transfer\\n\\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\\n\\n### Hidden waiting\\n\\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\\n\\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\\n\\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\\n\\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\\n\\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\\n\\nNot acceptable:\\n\\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\\n\\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\\n\\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\\n\\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\\n\\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\\n\\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-checks.md): \"# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\\n\\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\\n\\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\\n\\n## Before construction\\n\\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\\n\\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\\n\\n## During construction\\n\\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\\n\\n## Structural validity\\n\\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\\n\\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\\n\\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\\n\\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\\n\\n## Existing-net revision\\n\\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\\n\\n## Delivery\\n\\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\\n\\nState plainly:\\n\\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\\n\\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000024", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFFVDBaWFBXNlhLUVZZU1AxMlRGTTcx", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1ET0ZYZ0WQCXFP56CQ7K04J", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZYXZJGNM1WX08WTVVHG", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 5 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md" + }, + "output": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n", + "durationMs": 1 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md" + }, + "output": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n", + "durationMs": 1 + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1ET0ZXQY1VD1MK861MJ9YWH" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.681Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.683Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.708Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.716Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZYXZJGNM1WX08WTVVHG", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.717Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZYXZJGNM1WX08WTVVHG", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277194513:pme8qukwz2", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.717Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277194513:pme8qukwz2", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3252, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3252, + "totalTokens": 6515, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277194513 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZYXZJGNM1WX08WTVVHG", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.720Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\":\"sdcpn-m", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZYXZJGNM1WX08WTVVHG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.720Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "odelling\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZYXZJGNM1WX08WTVVHG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.720Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZYXZJGNM1WX08WTVVHG", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 5, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277194513:pme8qukwz2", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3252, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3252, + "totalTokens": 6515, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.722Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277194513:pme8qukwz2", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3252, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3252, + "totalTokens": 6515, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277194513 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZYXZJGNM1WX08WTVVHG", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.722Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZYXZJGNM1WX08WTVVHG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.725Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277194728 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZYXZJGNM1WX08WTVVHG", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.728Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277194728 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZYXZJGNM1WX08WTVVHG", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.728Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 5, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZYXZJGNM1WX08WTVVHG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.730Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZYXZJGNM1WX08WTVVHG", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277194513:pme8qukwz2", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3252, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3252, + "totalTokens": 6515, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277194513 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277194728 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.730Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZB2F48D8TC992Y006X", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.731Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZB2F48D8TC992Y006X", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277194513:pme8qukwz2", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.731Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277194513:pme8qukwz2", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1814, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2537, + "cacheWrite": 1814, + "totalTokens": 6194, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277194732 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZB2F48D8TC992Y006X", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.733Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.f", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZB2F48D8TC992Y006X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.733Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "lue/packaged-skills/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZB2F48D8TC992Y006X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.733Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "skill%3Asdcpn-mo", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZB2F48D8TC992Y006X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.733Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "delling%3A2d0cdf44c8", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZB2F48D8TC992Y006X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.733Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "4d68c9/pn-co", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZB2F48D8TC992Y006X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.733Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "nstruction.m", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZB2F48D8TC992Y006X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.733Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "d\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZB2F48D8TC992Y006X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.733Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZB2F48D8TC992Y006X", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277194513:pme8qukwz2", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 1814, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2537, + "cacheWrite": 1814, + "totalTokens": 6194, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.734Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277194513:pme8qukwz2", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1814, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2537, + "cacheWrite": 1814, + "totalTokens": 6194, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277194732 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZB2F48D8TC992Y006X", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.734Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZB2F48D8TC992Y006X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.735Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277194736 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZB2F48D8TC992Y006X", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.736Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277194736 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZB2F48D8TC992Y006X", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.736Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + } + }, + "durationMs": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZB2F48D8TC992Y006X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.737Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZB2F48D8TC992Y006X", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277194513:pme8qukwz2", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1814, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2537, + "cacheWrite": 1814, + "totalTokens": 6194, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277194732 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277194736 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.738Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZJMWXX8WAHJ236FV2G", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.738Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZJMWXX8WAHJ236FV2G", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277194513:pme8qukwz2", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.738Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277194513:pme8qukwz2", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3635, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9946, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277194740 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZJMWXX8WAHJ236FV2G", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.740Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.flue/pack", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZJMWXX8WAHJ236FV2G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.740Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "aged-skills/skill%3A", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZJMWXX8WAHJ236FV2G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.740Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "sdcpn-modelling%3A2d", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZJMWXX8WAHJ236FV2G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.741Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "0cdf44c84d68", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZJMWXX8WAHJ236FV2G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.741Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "c9/checks.md\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZJMWXX8WAHJ236FV2G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.741Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZJMWXX8WAHJ236FV2G", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277194513:pme8qukwz2", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3635, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9946, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.741Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277194513:pme8qukwz2", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3635, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9946, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277194740 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZJMWXX8WAHJ236FV2G", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.741Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZJMWXX8WAHJ236FV2G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.742Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277194743 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZJMWXX8WAHJ236FV2G", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.743Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277194743 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZJMWXX8WAHJ236FV2G", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.743Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + } + }, + "durationMs": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZJMWXX8WAHJ236FV2G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.744Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZJMWXX8WAHJ236FV2G", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277194513:pme8qukwz2", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3635, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9946, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277194740 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277194743 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.744Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZS5N0S2HP10HQMW3PV", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.745Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZS5N0S2HP10HQMW3PV", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277194513:pme8qukwz2", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.745Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277194513:pme8qukwz2", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 46, + "cacheRead": 6061, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10107, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277194513 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZS5N0S2HP10HQMW3PV", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.746Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "First, factor the ti", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZS5N0S2HP10HQMW3PV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.749Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "med review into ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZS5N0S2HP10HQMW3PV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.749Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "start, in-pr", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZS5N0S2HP10HQMW3PV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.749Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ogress, appr", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZS5N0S2HP10HQMW3PV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.749Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "oval, and re", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZS5N0S2HP10HQMW3PV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.749Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "jection transiti", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZS5N0S2HP10HQMW3PV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.749Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ons so the revie", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZS5N0S2HP10HQMW3PV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.749Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "wer token is reserve", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZS5N0S2HP10HQMW3PV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 57, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.749Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "d during the", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZS5N0S2HP10HQMW3PV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 58, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.749Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " 20-minute c", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZS5N0S2HP10HQMW3PV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 59, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.749Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "heck and returned on", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZS5N0S2HP10HQMW3PV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 60, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.749Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " either outcome.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZS5N0S2HP10HQMW3PV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 61, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.749Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZS5N0S2HP10HQMW3PV", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 5, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277194513:pme8qukwz2", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome." + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 46, + "cacheRead": 6061, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10107, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 62, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.750Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277194513:pme8qukwz2", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 46, + "cacheRead": 6061, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10107, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277194513 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZS5N0S2HP10HQMW3PV", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 63, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.750Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET0ZZS5N0S2HP10HQMW3PV", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277194513:pme8qukwz2", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 46, + "cacheRead": 6061, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10107, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277194513 + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 64, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.751Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277194513:pme8qukwz2", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3252, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3252, + "totalTokens": 6515, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277194513 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277194728 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277194513:pme8qukwz2", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1814, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2537, + "cacheWrite": 1814, + "totalTokens": 6194, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277194732 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277194736 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277194513:pme8qukwz2", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3635, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9946, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277194740 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277194743 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277194513:pme8qukwz2", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 46, + "cacheRead": 6061, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10107, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277194513 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 65, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.752Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 44, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 66, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.752Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET0ZXSDMYERXTW03ANPS5D", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET0ZYM06ZPXTE5E5H776N4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 67, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.752Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET0ZXPW6XKQVYSP12TFM71", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "0f1b91eddbf89733cdaa77ba6f0fed14ed5ad7ae5789aa5d68c48f2bb7e57928", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 68, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:54.752Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "82356eb4e0aab1634c21d96a36e834394fe9987e7445a26b84c6fd1c497763ab", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "df514bda6fbedcbcf09b8bd8b148716cb8a3297293a8cd4e18ec47e566c46b62", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "a67aa0c87bdc8e72c0bcbbe4cad603ed264809957b56b9c0ccef4032ae08cf0e", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "21bf274423e833c1e4a4af5f747978a4c3c3db2815da973a4894c8e72dba88de", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/scenarios.json": "10e5b6897319045485a33e556d1de05241cbdbe9ddf5e8fa6c72ef73199252c1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/protocol.md": "476984da4bd65f21717dff1c450a82e86017ef0652b03b778c0691e585aabf0a", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md": "c16d5faaa7a450a41d6888dd6d2b3eac88e4687779b0c8f8e6fe4eceeeb241c6", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "b4959142f10c74e9b04a5d0c0dfb3b74dbab8c492a26e34d2c2c8ff9e3eb7cfa" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "a4b0261917a6627172e83b87f31142fb905758a8a7f7a7f000781c1fba880f34", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "63adaa3aa89e11862add6537e33c87fdb548bd058c7dac54fa67a5a28cc20b3c", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/independent-S3.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/independent-S3.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8e94150f1e7 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/independent-S3.json @@ -0,0 +1,2995 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-independent-s3-ee0076c6", + "phase": "hermetic", + "candidate": "independent", + "scenarioId": "S3", + "scenario": { + "title": "Review with a resolvable target defect", + "prompt": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token.", + "stopAfter": "The first supported defect finding.", + "expected": "Identify the missing reviewer return on rejection without loading universal elicitation." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer.", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling", "elicitation"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md" + }, + "output": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md" + }, + "output": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [ + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md", + "sha256": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694" + }, + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md", + "sha256": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5" + } + ], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 5, + "inputTokens": 3125, + "outputTokens": 11, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 3125, + "totalTokens": 6261, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3, + "inputTokens": 1814, + "outputTokens": 29, + "cacheReadTokens": 2409, + "cacheWriteTokens": 1814, + "totalTokens": 6066, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3, + "inputTokens": 3142, + "outputTokens": 27, + "cacheReadTokens": 3507, + "cacheWriteTokens": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9818, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 5, + "inputTokens": 2000, + "outputTokens": 45, + "cacheReadTokens": 5933, + "cacheWriteTokens": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9978, + "cost": 0 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 16, + "inputTokens": 10081, + "outputTokens": 112, + "cacheReadTokens": 11849, + "cacheWriteTokens": 10081, + "totalTokens": 32123, + "cost": 0 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nReview the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token.\n\n## Assistant\nThe rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer.\n- tool activate_skill (activate-sdcpn): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-pn-construction.md): \"# SDCPN Construction\\n\\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\\n\\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\\n\\n## Construction boundary\\n\\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\\n\\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\\n\\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\\n\\n## Mapping principles\\n\\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\\n| --- | --- |\\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\\n\\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\\n\\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\\n\\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\\n\\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\\n\\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\\n\\n## Construction patterns\\n\\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\\n\\n### Timed work\\n\\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\\n\\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\\n\\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\\n\\n### Contended resource\\n\\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\\n\\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\\n\\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\\n\\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\\n\\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\\n\\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\\n\\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\\n\\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\\n\\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\\n\\n### Mode change\\n\\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\\n\\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\\n\\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\\n\\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\\n\\n### Spatial transfer\\n\\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\\n\\n### Hidden waiting\\n\\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\\n\\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\\n\\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\\n\\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\\n\\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\\n\\nNot acceptable:\\n\\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\\n\\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\\n\\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\\n\\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\\n\\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\\n\\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-checks.md): \"# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\\n\\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\\n\\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\\n\\n## Before construction\\n\\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\\n\\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\\n\\n## During construction\\n\\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\\n\\n## Structural validity\\n\\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\\n\\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\\n\\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\\n\\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\\n\\n## Existing-net revision\\n\\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\\n\\n## Delivery\\n\\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\\n\\nState plainly:\\n\\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\\n\\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000024", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFFVDEwRzFFUlZBVFdTNFIwTlpZTURT", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1ET10H579Y3VHJXXJ62P9RC", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10H23EZPYWEBVGN63VZ5", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 3 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md" + }, + "output": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n", + "durationMs": 1 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md" + }, + "output": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n", + "durationMs": 1 + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1ET10G2HR3DPHTSQ4DXJAW7" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.267Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.270Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.293Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.298Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10H23EZPYWEBVGN63VZ5", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.298Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10H23EZPYWEBVGN63VZ5", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277195093:eqtca0d5m9", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.299Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277195093:eqtca0d5m9", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3125, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3125, + "totalTokens": 6261, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277195093 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10H23EZPYWEBVGN63VZ5", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.302Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\":\"sdc", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10H23EZPYWEBVGN63VZ5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.302Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "pn-modelling", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10H23EZPYWEBVGN63VZ5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.302Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10H23EZPYWEBVGN63VZ5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.302Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10H23EZPYWEBVGN63VZ5", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 5, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277195093:eqtca0d5m9", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3125, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3125, + "totalTokens": 6261, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.304Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277195093:eqtca0d5m9", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3125, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3125, + "totalTokens": 6261, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277195093 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10H23EZPYWEBVGN63VZ5", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.304Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10H23EZPYWEBVGN63VZ5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.306Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277195309 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10H23EZPYWEBVGN63VZ5", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.309Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277195309 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10H23EZPYWEBVGN63VZ5", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.309Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 3, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10H23EZPYWEBVGN63VZ5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.310Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10H23EZPYWEBVGN63VZ5", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277195093:eqtca0d5m9", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3125, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3125, + "totalTokens": 6261, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277195093 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277195309 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.310Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HF82XMPCKXWYP0PJ5A", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.311Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HF82XMPCKXWYP0PJ5A", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277195093:eqtca0d5m9", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.311Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277195093:eqtca0d5m9", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1814, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2409, + "cacheWrite": 1814, + "totalTokens": 6066, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277195312 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HF82XMPCKXWYP0PJ5A", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.313Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.flue/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HF82XMPCKXWYP0PJ5A", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.313Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "packaged-skills/skil", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HF82XMPCKXWYP0PJ5A", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.313Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "l%3Asdcpn-modell", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HF82XMPCKXWYP0PJ5A", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.313Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "ing%3A2d0cdf", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HF82XMPCKXWYP0PJ5A", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.313Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "44c84d68c9/pn-constr", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HF82XMPCKXWYP0PJ5A", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.313Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "uction.md\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HF82XMPCKXWYP0PJ5A", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.313Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HF82XMPCKXWYP0PJ5A", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277195093:eqtca0d5m9", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 1814, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2409, + "cacheWrite": 1814, + "totalTokens": 6066, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.314Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277195093:eqtca0d5m9", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1814, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2409, + "cacheWrite": 1814, + "totalTokens": 6066, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277195312 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HF82XMPCKXWYP0PJ5A", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.314Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HF82XMPCKXWYP0PJ5A", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.315Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277195316 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HF82XMPCKXWYP0PJ5A", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.316Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277195316 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HF82XMPCKXWYP0PJ5A", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.317Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + } + }, + "durationMs": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HF82XMPCKXWYP0PJ5A", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.317Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HF82XMPCKXWYP0PJ5A", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277195093:eqtca0d5m9", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1814, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2409, + "cacheWrite": 1814, + "totalTokens": 6066, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277195312 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277195316 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.318Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HQZ8NAT8CDJXZVR29X", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.319Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HQZ8NAT8CDJXZVR29X", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277195093:eqtca0d5m9", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.319Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277195093:eqtca0d5m9", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3507, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9818, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277195319 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HQZ8NAT8CDJXZVR29X", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.320Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.flue/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HQZ8NAT8CDJXZVR29X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.320Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "packaged-skills/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HQZ8NAT8CDJXZVR29X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.320Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "skill%3Asdcpn-modell", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HQZ8NAT8CDJXZVR29X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.320Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "ing%3A2d0cdf44c8", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HQZ8NAT8CDJXZVR29X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.320Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "4d68c9/check", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HQZ8NAT8CDJXZVR29X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.320Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "s.md\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HQZ8NAT8CDJXZVR29X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.320Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HQZ8NAT8CDJXZVR29X", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277195093:eqtca0d5m9", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3507, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9818, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.322Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277195093:eqtca0d5m9", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3507, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9818, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277195319 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HQZ8NAT8CDJXZVR29X", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.322Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HQZ8NAT8CDJXZVR29X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.322Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277195323 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HQZ8NAT8CDJXZVR29X", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.323Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277195323 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HQZ8NAT8CDJXZVR29X", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.323Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + } + }, + "durationMs": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HQZ8NAT8CDJXZVR29X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.324Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HQZ8NAT8CDJXZVR29X", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277195093:eqtca0d5m9", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3507, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9818, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277195319 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277195323 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.325Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HXEZ2MFESET6MTSXFK", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.325Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HXEZ2MFESET6MTSXFK", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277195093:eqtca0d5m9", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.325Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277195093:eqtca0d5m9", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 45, + "cacheRead": 5933, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9978, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277195093 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HXEZ2MFESET6MTSXFK", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.326Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "The rejection path l", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HXEZ2MFESET6MTSXFK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.329Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "eaks the reusabl", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HXEZ2MFESET6MTSXFK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.329Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "e reviewer token: th", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HXEZ2MFESET6MTSXFK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.329Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "e account re", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HXEZ2MFESET6MTSXFK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.329Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "quires relea", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HXEZ2MFESET6MTSXFK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.329Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "se after either outc", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HXEZ2MFESET6MTSXFK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.329Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ome, but RecordR", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HXEZ2MFESET6MTSXFK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 57, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.329Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ejection has", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HXEZ2MFESET6MTSXFK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 58, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.329Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " no output a", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HXEZ2MFESET6MTSXFK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 59, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.329Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "rc returning it ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HXEZ2MFESET6MTSXFK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 60, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.329Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "to AvailableRevi", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HXEZ2MFESET6MTSXFK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 61, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.329Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ewer.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HXEZ2MFESET6MTSXFK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 62, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.329Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HXEZ2MFESET6MTSXFK", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 5, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277195093:eqtca0d5m9", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer." + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 45, + "cacheRead": 5933, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9978, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 63, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.330Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277195093:eqtca0d5m9", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 45, + "cacheRead": 5933, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9978, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277195093 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HXEZ2MFESET6MTSXFK", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 64, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.330Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET10HXEZ2MFESET6MTSXFK", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277195093:eqtca0d5m9", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 45, + "cacheRead": 5933, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9978, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277195093 + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 65, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.331Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277195093:eqtca0d5m9", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3125, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3125, + "totalTokens": 6261, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277195093 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277195309 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277195093:eqtca0d5m9", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1814, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2409, + "cacheWrite": 1814, + "totalTokens": 6066, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277195312 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277195316 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277195093:eqtca0d5m9", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3507, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9818, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277195319 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277195323 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277195093:eqtca0d5m9", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 45, + "cacheRead": 5933, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9978, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277195093 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 66, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.332Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 39, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 67, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.332Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET10G3C4R1HD5J5C1QDX6T", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET10GXHQR0CCCQBCDAWYGS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 68, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.332Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET10G1ERVATWS4R0NZYMDS", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "aba64492aeb7fad052bff5f3570cb21f2eddcfbcadecea91bdec734bf6fc4308", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 69, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.332Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "82356eb4e0aab1634c21d96a36e834394fe9987e7445a26b84c6fd1c497763ab", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "df514bda6fbedcbcf09b8bd8b148716cb8a3297293a8cd4e18ec47e566c46b62", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "a67aa0c87bdc8e72c0bcbbe4cad603ed264809957b56b9c0ccef4032ae08cf0e", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "21bf274423e833c1e4a4af5f747978a4c3c3db2815da973a4894c8e72dba88de", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/scenarios.json": "10e5b6897319045485a33e556d1de05241cbdbe9ddf5e8fa6c72ef73199252c1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/protocol.md": "476984da4bd65f21717dff1c450a82e86017ef0652b03b778c0691e585aabf0a", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md": "c16d5faaa7a450a41d6888dd6d2b3eac88e4687779b0c8f8e6fe4eceeeb241c6", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "b4959142f10c74e9b04a5d0c0dfb3b74dbab8c492a26e34d2c2c8ff9e3eb7cfa" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "a4b0261917a6627172e83b87f31142fb905758a8a7f7a7f000781c1fba880f34", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "63adaa3aa89e11862add6537e33c87fdb548bd058c7dac54fa67a5a28cc20b3c", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/independent-S4.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/independent-S4.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c614bf53393 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/independent-S4.json @@ -0,0 +1,2905 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-independent-s4-4b67fb53", + "phase": "hermetic", + "candidate": "independent", + "scenarioId": "S4", + "scenario": { + "title": "Review exposing a human-knowledge gap", + "prompt": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately.", + "stopAfter": "One focused question about the unresolved release distinction.", + "expected": "Load universal elicitation and ask whether rejection releases the reviewer or retains assignment through appeal." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "When a request is rejected, does that immediately free the reviewer for another request, or do they remain assigned through an appeal window?", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling", "elicitation"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling", "elicitation"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "elicitation" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [ + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "sha256": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf" + } + ], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 5, + "inputTokens": 3102, + "outputTokens": 11, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 3102, + "totalTokens": 6215, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3, + "inputTokens": 1814, + "outputTokens": 10, + "cacheReadTokens": 2386, + "cacheWriteTokens": 1814, + "totalTokens": 6024, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 2, + "inputTokens": 4349, + "outputTokens": 30, + "cacheReadTokens": 3484, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4349, + "totalTokens": 12212, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 5, + "inputTokens": 4895, + "outputTokens": 36, + "cacheReadTokens": 7117, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16943, + "cost": 0 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 15, + "inputTokens": 14160, + "outputTokens": 87, + "cacheReadTokens": 12987, + "cacheWriteTokens": 14160, + "totalTokens": 41394, + "cost": 0 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nReview the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately.\n\n## Assistant\nWhen a request is rejected, does that immediately free the reviewer for another request, or do they remain assigned through an appeal window?\n- tool activate_skill (activate-sdcpn): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\\n\"\n- tool activate_skill (activate-elicitation): \"Run the skill named \\\"elicitation\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\\n\\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\\n\\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Work from purpose\\n\\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\\n\\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\\n\\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\\n\\n### Follow the person's account\\n\\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\\n\\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\\n\\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\\n\\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\\n\\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\\n\\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\\n\\n### Treat divergence as information\\n\\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\\n\\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\\n\\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\\n\\n### Stop honestly\\n\\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\\n\\n### Vague or compressed language\\n\\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\\n\\n### Normative language\\n\\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\\n\\n### Tension within or between accounts\\n\\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\\n\\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\\n\\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\\n\\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\\n\\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\\n\\n### Diminishing yield\\n\\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\\n\\n### Assent without independent wording\\n\\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\\n\\n### Silence and absence\\n\\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\\n\\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\\n\\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\\n\\n### Slice a concrete case\\n\\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\\n\\n### Sweep one property\\n\\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\\n\\n### Ask for the last occurrence\\n\\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\\n\\n### Ask for the basis\\n\\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\\n\\n### Ground a term or artifact\\n\\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\\n\\n### Clarify until observable\\n\\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\\n\\n### Use contrastive cases\\n\\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\\n\\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\\n\\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\\n\\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\\n\\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\\n\\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\\n\\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\\n\\n### Restate for correction\\n\\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\\n\\n### Propose structure for correction\\n\\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\\n\\n### Deposit and defer\\n\\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\\n\\n### Press without trapping\\n\\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\\n\\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\\n\\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\\n\\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\\n\\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\\n\\n### Trade concrete outcomes\\n\\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\\n\\n### Close with one correction opportunity\\n\\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\\n\\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\\n\\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\\n\\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\\n\\n### Before asking\\n\\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\\n\\n### Before recording\\n\\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\\n\\n### Before closing\\n\\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-sdcpn-elicitation.md): \"# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\\n\\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\\n\\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\\n\\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\\n\\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\\n\\n### Keep target structure backstage\\n\\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\\n\\n### Preserve operational context\\n\\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\\n\\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\\n\\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\\n\\n### Language and account signals\\n\\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\\n\\n### Operational situation patterns\\n\\n#### Timed work\\n\\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\\n\\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\\n\\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\\n\\n#### Contended resource\\n\\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\\n\\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\\n\\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\\n\\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\\n\\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\\n\\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\\n\\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\\n\\n#### Mode change\\n\\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\\n\\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\\n\\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\\n\\n#### Spatial transfer\\n\\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\\n\\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\\n\\n#### Policy under pressure\\n\\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\\n\\n#### Hidden waiting\\n\\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\\n\\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\\n\\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\\n\\n### Link the slice to the objective\\n\\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\\n\\n### Expose the process spine\\n\\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\\n\\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\\n\\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\\n\\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\\n\\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\\n\\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\\n\\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\\n\\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\\n\\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\\n\\n### Close a resource account\\n\\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\\n\\n### Close a mode change in both directions\\n\\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\\n\\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\\n\\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\\n\\n### Ask what is conserved\\n\\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\\n\\n### Establish retry scope\\n\\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\\n\\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\\n\\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\\n\\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\\n\\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\\n\\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\\n\\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\\n\\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\\n\\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\\n\\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\\n\\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\\n\\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\\n\\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\\n\\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\\n\\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\\n\\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\\n\\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\\n\\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\\n\\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\\n\\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\\n\\n### Purpose and process\\n\\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\\n\\n### Operational semantics\\n\\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\\n\\n### Quantities and context\\n\\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000024", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFFVDExMjdDMjY4WjdWSERNRUtYS0FE", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1ET113BTQ4ZGATY9E01CKTN", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET1138MT86Z1H0HHTEND7R", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 4 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "elicitation" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "When a request is rejected, does that immediately free the reviewer for another request, or do they remain assigned through an appeal window?", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1ET11275HXTY5RQF6VQHWKA" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.849Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.852Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.875Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.880Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET1138MT86Z1H0HHTEND7R", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.880Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET1138MT86Z1H0HHTEND7R", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277195669:xgcno5qficb", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.881Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277195669:xgcno5qficb", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3102, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3102, + "totalTokens": 6215, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277195670 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET1138MT86Z1H0HHTEND7R", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.884Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\":\"sdc", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET1138MT86Z1H0HHTEND7R", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.884Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "pn-modelling", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET1138MT86Z1H0HHTEND7R", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.884Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET1138MT86Z1H0HHTEND7R", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.885Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET1138MT86Z1H0HHTEND7R", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 5, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277195669:xgcno5qficb", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3102, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3102, + "totalTokens": 6215, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.886Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277195669:xgcno5qficb", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3102, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3102, + "totalTokens": 6215, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277195670 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET1138MT86Z1H0HHTEND7R", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.886Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET1138MT86Z1H0HHTEND7R", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.888Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277195891 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET1138MT86Z1H0HHTEND7R", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.891Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277195891 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET1138MT86Z1H0HHTEND7R", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.891Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 4, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET1138MT86Z1H0HHTEND7R", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.892Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET1138MT86Z1H0HHTEND7R", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277195669:xgcno5qficb", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3102, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3102, + "totalTokens": 6215, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277195670 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277195891 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.892Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET113NB89BGW72CS718T93", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.893Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET113NB89BGW72CS718T93", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277195669:xgcno5qficb", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.893Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277195669:xgcno5qficb", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1814, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 2386, + "cacheWrite": 1814, + "totalTokens": 6024, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277195670 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET113NB89BGW72CS718T93", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.894Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\":\"eli", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET113NB89BGW72CS718T93", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.895Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "citation\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET113NB89BGW72CS718T93", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.895Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET113NB89BGW72CS718T93", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277195669:xgcno5qficb", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 1814, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 2386, + "cacheWrite": 1814, + "totalTokens": 6024, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.896Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277195669:xgcno5qficb", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1814, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 2386, + "cacheWrite": 1814, + "totalTokens": 6024, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277195670 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET113NB89BGW72CS718T93", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.896Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET113NB89BGW72CS718T93", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.896Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277195898 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET113NB89BGW72CS718T93", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.898Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277195898 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET113NB89BGW72CS718T93", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.898Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + } + }, + "durationMs": 2, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET113NB89BGW72CS718T93", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.899Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET113NB89BGW72CS718T93", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277195669:xgcno5qficb", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1814, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 2386, + "cacheWrite": 1814, + "totalTokens": 6024, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277195670 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277195898 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.899Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET113X8SY1D91PC8XWM6GQ", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.901Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET113X8SY1D91PC8XWM6GQ", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277195669:xgcno5qficb", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.901Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277195669:xgcno5qficb", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4349, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3484, + "cacheWrite": 4349, + "totalTokens": 12212, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277195901 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET113X8SY1D91PC8XWM6GQ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.902Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.f", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET113X8SY1D91PC8XWM6GQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.902Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "lue/packaged-skills/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET113X8SY1D91PC8XWM6GQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.902Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "skill%3Asdcp", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET113X8SY1D91PC8XWM6GQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.902Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "n-modelling%", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET113X8SY1D91PC8XWM6GQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.902Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/s", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET113X8SY1D91PC8XWM6GQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.902Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "dcpn-elicitation", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET113X8SY1D91PC8XWM6GQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.903Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": ".md\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET113X8SY1D91PC8XWM6GQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.903Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET113X8SY1D91PC8XWM6GQ", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 2, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277195669:xgcno5qficb", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 4349, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3484, + "cacheWrite": 4349, + "totalTokens": 12212, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.903Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277195669:xgcno5qficb", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4349, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3484, + "cacheWrite": 4349, + "totalTokens": 12212, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277195901 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET113X8SY1D91PC8XWM6GQ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.903Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET113X8SY1D91PC8XWM6GQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.904Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277195906 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET113X8SY1D91PC8XWM6GQ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.906Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277195906 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET113X8SY1D91PC8XWM6GQ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.906Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + } + }, + "durationMs": 2, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET113X8SY1D91PC8XWM6GQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.907Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET113X8SY1D91PC8XWM6GQ", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277195669:xgcno5qficb", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4349, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3484, + "cacheWrite": 4349, + "totalTokens": 12212, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277195901 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277195906 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.908Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET1145CC68KG2YP1DZKC4P", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.909Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET1145CC68KG2YP1DZKC4P", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277195669:xgcno5qficb", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.909Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277195669:xgcno5qficb", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 36, + "cacheRead": 7117, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16943, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277195670 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET1145CC68KG2YP1DZKC4P", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.910Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "When a reque", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET1145CC68KG2YP1DZKC4P", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.913Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "st is rejected, ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET1145CC68KG2YP1DZKC4P", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.913Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "does that immediatel", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET1145CC68KG2YP1DZKC4P", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.913Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "y free the revie", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET1145CC68KG2YP1DZKC4P", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.913Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "wer for anot", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET1145CC68KG2YP1DZKC4P", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.913Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "her request,", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET1145CC68KG2YP1DZKC4P", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.913Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " or do they rema", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET1145CC68KG2YP1DZKC4P", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.913Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "in assigned through ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET1145CC68KG2YP1DZKC4P", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.913Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "an appeal window", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET1145CC68KG2YP1DZKC4P", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.913Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "?", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET1145CC68KG2YP1DZKC4P", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 57, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.913Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET1145CC68KG2YP1DZKC4P", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 5, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277195669:xgcno5qficb", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "When a request is rejected, does that immediately free the reviewer for another request, or do they remain assigned through an appeal window?" + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 36, + "cacheRead": 7117, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16943, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 58, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.914Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "When a request is rejected, does that immediately free the reviewer for another request, or do they remain assigned through an appeal window?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277195669:xgcno5qficb", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 36, + "cacheRead": 7117, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16943, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277195670 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET1145CC68KG2YP1DZKC4P", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 59, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.914Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET1145CC68KG2YP1DZKC4P", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "When a request is rejected, does that immediately free the reviewer for another request, or do they remain assigned through an appeal window?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277195669:xgcno5qficb", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 36, + "cacheRead": 7117, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16943, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277195670 + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 60, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.916Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277195669:xgcno5qficb", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3102, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3102, + "totalTokens": 6215, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277195670 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277195891 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277195669:xgcno5qficb", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1814, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 2386, + "cacheWrite": 1814, + "totalTokens": 6024, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277195670 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277195898 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277195669:xgcno5qficb", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4349, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3484, + "cacheWrite": 4349, + "totalTokens": 12212, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277195901 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277195906 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "When a request is rejected, does that immediately free the reviewer for another request, or do they remain assigned through an appeal window?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277195669:xgcno5qficb", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 36, + "cacheRead": 7117, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16943, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277195670 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 61, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.916Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 42, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 62, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.917Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET1129RP236Z6FWHD95ZCQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET1133P65VGYHZAJZ3J4FV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 63, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.917Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET1127C268Z7VHDMEKXKAD", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "b409bc6ac5cd47927879db70e3b1bb5c6ee3ab4a25ab40868bc551fc151b58e9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 64, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:55.917Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "82356eb4e0aab1634c21d96a36e834394fe9987e7445a26b84c6fd1c497763ab", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "df514bda6fbedcbcf09b8bd8b148716cb8a3297293a8cd4e18ec47e566c46b62", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "a67aa0c87bdc8e72c0bcbbe4cad603ed264809957b56b9c0ccef4032ae08cf0e", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "21bf274423e833c1e4a4af5f747978a4c3c3db2815da973a4894c8e72dba88de", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/scenarios.json": "10e5b6897319045485a33e556d1de05241cbdbe9ddf5e8fa6c72ef73199252c1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/protocol.md": "476984da4bd65f21717dff1c450a82e86017ef0652b03b778c0691e585aabf0a", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md": "c16d5faaa7a450a41d6888dd6d2b3eac88e4687779b0c8f8e6fe4eceeeb241c6", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "b4959142f10c74e9b04a5d0c0dfb3b74dbab8c492a26e34d2c2c8ff9e3eb7cfa" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "a4b0261917a6627172e83b87f31142fb905758a8a7f7a7f000781c1fba880f34", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "63adaa3aa89e11862add6537e33c87fdb548bd058c7dac54fa67a5a28cc20b3c", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/independent-missing-S5.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/independent-missing-S5.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..feac1c4ad87 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/independent-missing-S5.json @@ -0,0 +1,2078 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-independent-missing-s5-9debc0e3", + "phase": "hermetic", + "candidate": "independent-missing", + "scenarioId": "S5", + "scenario": { + "title": "Missing core capability", + "prompt": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "stopAfter": "The native missing-capability result and the first resulting behavior.", + "expected": "Expose Flue's actual response when the plugin asks for an unmounted elicitation skill." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "The required elicitation capability is unavailable, so I cannot responsibly continue this underspecified modelling request.", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling", "elicitation"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "activate-missing-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "elicitation" + }, + "output": "Skill \"elicitation\" is not available. Available skills: sdcpn-modelling." + } + ], + "readOutputs": [], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 4, + "inputTokens": 2896, + "outputTokens": 11, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 2896, + "totalTokens": 5803, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3, + "inputTokens": 1814, + "outputTokens": 10, + "cacheReadTokens": 2180, + "cacheWriteTokens": 1814, + "totalTokens": 5818, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 4, + "inputTokens": 753, + "outputTokens": 31, + "cacheReadTokens": 3278, + "cacheWriteTokens": 753, + "totalTokens": 4815, + "cost": 0 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 11, + "inputTokens": 5463, + "outputTokens": 52, + "cacheReadTokens": 5458, + "cacheWriteTokens": 5463, + "totalTokens": 16436, + "cost": 0 + }, + "failureShape": { + "toolCallId": "activate-missing-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "elicitation" + }, + "output": "Skill \"elicitation\" is not available. Available skills: sdcpn-modelling." + }, + "transcript": "## User\nHelp me model our approval process as an SDCPN.\n\n## Assistant\nThe required elicitation capability is unavailable, so I cannot responsibly continue this underspecified modelling request.\n- tool activate_skill (activate-sdcpn): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\\n\"\n- tool activate_skill (activate-missing-elicitation): \"Skill \\\"elicitation\\\" is not available. Available skills: sdcpn-modelling.\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000019", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFFVDEzWENQVlZXOUJIVEhKNzczNTdZ", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1ET13YHCVJV5K320PR0GE87", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13YF3X1KNM340HENWD35", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 6 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-missing-elicitation", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "elicitation" + }, + "output": "Skill \"elicitation\" is not available. Available skills: sdcpn-modelling.", + "durationMs": 1 + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The required elicitation capability is unavailable, so I cannot responsibly continue this underspecified modelling request.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1ET13XDYGMSJKWQA5Q1MT6C" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.767Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.771Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.793Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.799Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13YF3X1KNM340HENWD35", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.799Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13YF3X1KNM340HENWD35", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277198597:l4vlfmp6a8r", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.799Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277198597:l4vlfmp6a8r", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2896, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2896, + "totalTokens": 5803, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277198597 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13YF3X1KNM340HENWD35", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.802Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\":\"sdcpn-model", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13YF3X1KNM340HENWD35", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.802Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "ling\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13YF3X1KNM340HENWD35", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.802Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13YF3X1KNM340HENWD35", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277198597:l4vlfmp6a8r", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2896, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2896, + "totalTokens": 5803, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.803Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277198597:l4vlfmp6a8r", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2896, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2896, + "totalTokens": 5803, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277198597 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13YF3X1KNM340HENWD35", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.804Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13YF3X1KNM340HENWD35", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.806Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277198810 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13YF3X1KNM340HENWD35", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.810Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277198810 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13YF3X1KNM340HENWD35", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.810Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 6, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13YF3X1KNM340HENWD35", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.811Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13YF3X1KNM340HENWD35", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277198597:l4vlfmp6a8r", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2896, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2896, + "totalTokens": 5803, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277198597 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277198810 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.811Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13YW7WA3JV4F27VSDBMJ", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.812Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13YW7WA3JV4F27VSDBMJ", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277198597:l4vlfmp6a8r", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.812Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277198597:l4vlfmp6a8r", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1814, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 2180, + "cacheWrite": 1814, + "totalTokens": 5818, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277198597 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13YW7WA3JV4F27VSDBMJ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.814Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-missing-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\":\"elicita", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13YW7WA3JV4F27VSDBMJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.814Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-missing-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "tion\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13YW7WA3JV4F27VSDBMJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.814Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13YW7WA3JV4F27VSDBMJ", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277198597:l4vlfmp6a8r", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-missing-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 1814, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 2180, + "cacheWrite": 1814, + "totalTokens": 5818, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.815Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-missing-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277198597:l4vlfmp6a8r", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1814, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 2180, + "cacheWrite": 1814, + "totalTokens": 5818, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277198597 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13YW7WA3JV4F27VSDBMJ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.815Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-missing-elicitation", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13YW7WA3JV4F27VSDBMJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.816Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-missing-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Skill \"elicitation\" is not available. Available skills: sdcpn-modelling." + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277198817 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13YW7WA3JV4F27VSDBMJ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.817Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-missing-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Skill \"elicitation\" is not available. Available skills: sdcpn-modelling." + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277198817 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13YW7WA3JV4F27VSDBMJ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.817Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-missing-elicitation", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Skill \"elicitation\" is not available. Available skills: sdcpn-modelling." + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + } + }, + "durationMs": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13YW7WA3JV4F27VSDBMJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.818Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Skill \"elicitation\" is not available. Available skills: sdcpn-modelling." + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13YW7WA3JV4F27VSDBMJ", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-missing-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277198597:l4vlfmp6a8r", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1814, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 2180, + "cacheWrite": 1814, + "totalTokens": 5818, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277198597 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-missing-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Skill \"elicitation\" is not available. Available skills: sdcpn-modelling." + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277198817 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.818Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13Z2WR67D0YY7ZXCFFNQ", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.818Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13Z2WR67D0YY7ZXCFFNQ", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277198597:l4vlfmp6a8r", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-missing-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-missing-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Skill \"elicitation\" is not available. Available skills: sdcpn-modelling." + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.818Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277198597:l4vlfmp6a8r", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 753, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 3278, + "cacheWrite": 753, + "totalTokens": 4815, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277198597 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13Z2WR67D0YY7ZXCFFNQ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.819Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "The required elicita", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13Z2WR67D0YY7ZXCFFNQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.821Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "tion capabil", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13Z2WR67D0YY7ZXCFFNQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.821Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ity is unavailable, ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13Z2WR67D0YY7ZXCFFNQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.821Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "so I cannot responsi", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13Z2WR67D0YY7ZXCFFNQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.821Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "bly continue", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13Z2WR67D0YY7ZXCFFNQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.821Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " this underspeci", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13Z2WR67D0YY7ZXCFFNQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.821Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "fied modelling reque", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13Z2WR67D0YY7ZXCFFNQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.821Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "st.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13Z2WR67D0YY7ZXCFFNQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.821Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13Z2WR67D0YY7ZXCFFNQ", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277198597:l4vlfmp6a8r", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The required elicitation capability is unavailable, so I cannot responsibly continue this underspecified modelling request." + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 753, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 3278, + "cacheWrite": 753, + "totalTokens": 4815, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.822Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The required elicitation capability is unavailable, so I cannot responsibly continue this underspecified modelling request." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277198597:l4vlfmp6a8r", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 753, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 3278, + "cacheWrite": 753, + "totalTokens": 4815, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277198597 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13Z2WR67D0YY7ZXCFFNQ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.822Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13Z2WR67D0YY7ZXCFFNQ", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The required elicitation capability is unavailable, so I cannot responsibly continue this underspecified modelling request." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277198597:l4vlfmp6a8r", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 753, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 3278, + "cacheWrite": 753, + "totalTokens": 4815, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277198597 + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.823Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277198597:l4vlfmp6a8r", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2896, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2896, + "totalTokens": 5803, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277198597 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277198810 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-missing-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277198597:l4vlfmp6a8r", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1814, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 2180, + "cacheWrite": 1814, + "totalTokens": 5818, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277198597 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-missing-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Skill \"elicitation\" is not available. Available skills: sdcpn-modelling." + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277198817 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The required elicitation capability is unavailable, so I cannot responsibly continue this underspecified modelling request." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277198597:l4vlfmp6a8r", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 753, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 3278, + "cacheWrite": 753, + "totalTokens": 4815, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277198597 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.824Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 31, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.824Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13XFXD336TRW4KM52007", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13Y86G4X292DER18T19X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.824Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13XCPVVW9BHTHJ77357Y", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "e90ef9dcc2d22255b86cb85254ddbe37e7066979e37dc250e2285afa216dc420", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.825Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "82356eb4e0aab1634c21d96a36e834394fe9987e7445a26b84c6fd1c497763ab", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "df514bda6fbedcbcf09b8bd8b148716cb8a3297293a8cd4e18ec47e566c46b62", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "a67aa0c87bdc8e72c0bcbbe4cad603ed264809957b56b9c0ccef4032ae08cf0e", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "21bf274423e833c1e4a4af5f747978a4c3c3db2815da973a4894c8e72dba88de", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/scenarios.json": "10e5b6897319045485a33e556d1de05241cbdbe9ddf5e8fa6c72ef73199252c1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/protocol.md": "476984da4bd65f21717dff1c450a82e86017ef0652b03b778c0691e585aabf0a", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md": "c16d5faaa7a450a41d6888dd6d2b3eac88e4687779b0c8f8e6fe4eceeeb241c6", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "b4959142f10c74e9b04a5d0c0dfb3b74dbab8c492a26e34d2c2c8ff9e3eb7cfa" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "a4b0261917a6627172e83b87f31142fb905758a8a7f7a7f000781c1fba880f34", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "63adaa3aa89e11862add6537e33c87fdb548bd058c7dac54fa67a5a28cc20b3c", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/packaged-S1.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/packaged-S1.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4d48cd96d86 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/packaged-S1.json @@ -0,0 +1,2935 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-packaged-s1-f8bff1a4", + "phase": "hermetic", + "candidate": "packaged", + "scenarioId": "S1", + "scenario": { + "title": "Underspecified interactive request", + "prompt": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "stopAfter": "The first consequential question.", + "expected": "Ask one high-yield question in operational vocabulary after loading universal and SDCPN elicitation judgment." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [ + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md", + "sha256": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "sha256": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf" + } + ], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 4, + "inputTokens": 2896, + "outputTokens": 11, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 2896, + "totalTokens": 5803, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3, + "inputTokens": 1850, + "outputTokens": 31, + "cacheReadTokens": 2180, + "cacheWriteTokens": 1850, + "totalTokens": 5911, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3, + "inputTokens": 4352, + "outputTokens": 30, + "cacheReadTokens": 3314, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4352, + "totalTokens": 12048, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 4, + "inputTokens": 4895, + "outputTokens": 32, + "cacheReadTokens": 6950, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16772, + "cost": 0 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 14, + "inputTokens": 13993, + "outputTokens": 104, + "cacheReadTokens": 12444, + "cacheWriteTokens": 13993, + "totalTokens": 40534, + "cost": 0 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nHelp me model our approval process as an SDCPN.\n\n## Assistant\nWhat decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?\n- tool activate_skill (activate-sdcpn): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-universal-elicitation.md): \"# Universal Elicitation Reference\\n\\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\\n\\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Work from purpose\\n\\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\\n\\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\\n\\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\\n\\n### Follow the person's account\\n\\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\\n\\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\\n\\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\\n\\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\\n\\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\\n\\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\\n\\n### Treat divergence as information\\n\\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\\n\\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\\n\\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\\n\\n### Stop honestly\\n\\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\\n\\n### Vague or compressed language\\n\\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\\n\\n### Normative language\\n\\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\\n\\n### Tension within or between accounts\\n\\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\\n\\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\\n\\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\\n\\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\\n\\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\\n\\n### Diminishing yield\\n\\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\\n\\n### Assent without independent wording\\n\\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\\n\\n### Silence and absence\\n\\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\\n\\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\\n\\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\\n\\n### Slice a concrete case\\n\\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\\n\\n### Sweep one property\\n\\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\\n\\n### Ask for the last occurrence\\n\\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\\n\\n### Ask for the basis\\n\\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\\n\\n### Ground a term or artifact\\n\\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\\n\\n### Clarify until observable\\n\\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\\n\\n### Use contrastive cases\\n\\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\\n\\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\\n\\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\\n\\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\\n\\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\\n\\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\\n\\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\\n\\n### Restate for correction\\n\\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\\n\\n### Propose structure for correction\\n\\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\\n\\n### Deposit and defer\\n\\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\\n\\n### Press without trapping\\n\\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\\n\\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\\n\\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\\n\\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\\n\\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\\n\\n### Trade concrete outcomes\\n\\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\\n\\n### Close with one correction opportunity\\n\\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\\n\\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\\n\\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\\n\\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\\n\\n### Before asking\\n\\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\\n\\n### Before recording\\n\\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\\n\\n### Before closing\\n\\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-sdcpn-elicitation.md): \"# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\\n\\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\\n\\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\\n\\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\\n\\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\\n\\n### Keep target structure backstage\\n\\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\\n\\n### Preserve operational context\\n\\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\\n\\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\\n\\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\\n\\n### Language and account signals\\n\\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\\n\\n### Operational situation patterns\\n\\n#### Timed work\\n\\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\\n\\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\\n\\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\\n\\n#### Contended resource\\n\\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\\n\\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\\n\\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\\n\\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\\n\\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\\n\\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\\n\\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\\n\\n#### Mode change\\n\\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\\n\\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\\n\\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\\n\\n#### Spatial transfer\\n\\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\\n\\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\\n\\n#### Policy under pressure\\n\\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\\n\\n#### Hidden waiting\\n\\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\\n\\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\\n\\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\\n\\n### Link the slice to the objective\\n\\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\\n\\n### Expose the process spine\\n\\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\\n\\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\\n\\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\\n\\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\\n\\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\\n\\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\\n\\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\\n\\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\\n\\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\\n\\n### Close a resource account\\n\\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\\n\\n### Close a mode change in both directions\\n\\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\\n\\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\\n\\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\\n\\n### Ask what is conserved\\n\\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\\n\\n### Establish retry scope\\n\\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\\n\\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\\n\\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\\n\\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\\n\\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\\n\\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\\n\\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\\n\\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\\n\\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\\n\\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\\n\\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\\n\\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\\n\\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\\n\\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\\n\\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\\n\\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\\n\\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\\n\\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\\n\\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\\n\\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\\n\\n### Purpose and process\\n\\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\\n\\n### Operational semantics\\n\\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\\n\\n### Quantities and context\\n\\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000024", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFFVDExTTkwUEVRMldLUlMxSlFKWDRC", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1ET11NA1GMQZP1KD2N2FCTA", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11N8R9RM5ZWMT6KZ3QK5", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 4 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n", + "durationMs": 1 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1ET11MADDKCQYB80B24V958" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.427Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.430Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.450Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.456Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11N8R9RM5ZWMT6KZ3QK5", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.456Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11N8R9RM5ZWMT6KZ3QK5", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277196259:w7ifjt8t43", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.456Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277196259:w7ifjt8t43", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2896, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2896, + "totalTokens": 5803, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277196259 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11N8R9RM5ZWMT6KZ3QK5", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.458Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\":\"sdc", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11N8R9RM5ZWMT6KZ3QK5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.459Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "pn-modelling\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11N8R9RM5ZWMT6KZ3QK5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.459Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11N8R9RM5ZWMT6KZ3QK5", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277196259:w7ifjt8t43", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2896, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2896, + "totalTokens": 5803, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.460Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277196259:w7ifjt8t43", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2896, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2896, + "totalTokens": 5803, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277196259 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11N8R9RM5ZWMT6KZ3QK5", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.461Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11N8R9RM5ZWMT6KZ3QK5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.463Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277196465 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11N8R9RM5ZWMT6KZ3QK5", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.465Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277196465 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11N8R9RM5ZWMT6KZ3QK5", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.465Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 4, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11N8R9RM5ZWMT6KZ3QK5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.468Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11N8R9RM5ZWMT6KZ3QK5", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277196259:w7ifjt8t43", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2896, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2896, + "totalTokens": 5803, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277196259 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277196465 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.468Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11NN45CF0G617GKDFNMJ", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.469Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11NN45CF0G617GKDFNMJ", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277196259:w7ifjt8t43", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.469Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277196259:w7ifjt8t43", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1850, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 2180, + "cacheWrite": 1850, + "totalTokens": 5911, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277196470 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11NN45CF0G617GKDFNMJ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.471Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.flue/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11NN45CF0G617GKDFNMJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.471Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "packaged-ski", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11NN45CF0G617GKDFNMJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.471Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "lls/skill%3Asdcp", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11NN45CF0G617GKDFNMJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.471Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "n-modelling%", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11NN45CF0G617GKDFNMJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.472Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "3A47e2d994e6934a", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11NN45CF0G617GKDFNMJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.472Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "99/universal-eli", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11NN45CF0G617GKDFNMJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.472Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "citation.md\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11NN45CF0G617GKDFNMJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.472Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11NN45CF0G617GKDFNMJ", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277196259:w7ifjt8t43", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 1850, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 2180, + "cacheWrite": 1850, + "totalTokens": 5911, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.473Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277196259:w7ifjt8t43", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1850, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 2180, + "cacheWrite": 1850, + "totalTokens": 5911, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277196470 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11NN45CF0G617GKDFNMJ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.473Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11NN45CF0G617GKDFNMJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.473Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277196475 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11NN45CF0G617GKDFNMJ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.475Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277196475 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11NN45CF0G617GKDFNMJ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.475Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + } + }, + "durationMs": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11NN45CF0G617GKDFNMJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.476Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11NN45CF0G617GKDFNMJ", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277196259:w7ifjt8t43", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1850, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 2180, + "cacheWrite": 1850, + "totalTokens": 5911, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277196470 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277196475 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.476Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11NX1QPQKWD1ED133FMX", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.477Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11NX1QPQKWD1ED133FMX", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277196259:w7ifjt8t43", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.477Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277196259:w7ifjt8t43", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4352, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3314, + "cacheWrite": 4352, + "totalTokens": 12048, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277196478 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11NX1QPQKWD1ED133FMX", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.479Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.flue/pack", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11NX1QPQKWD1ED133FMX", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.479Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "aged-skills/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11NX1QPQKWD1ED133FMX", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.479Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "skill%3Asdcpn-mo", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11NX1QPQKWD1ED133FMX", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.479Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "delling%3A47e2d9", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11NX1QPQKWD1ED133FMX", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.479Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "94e6934a99/sdcpn-eli", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11NX1QPQKWD1ED133FMX", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.479Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "citation.md\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11NX1QPQKWD1ED133FMX", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.479Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11NX1QPQKWD1ED133FMX", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277196259:w7ifjt8t43", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 4352, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3314, + "cacheWrite": 4352, + "totalTokens": 12048, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.480Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277196259:w7ifjt8t43", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4352, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3314, + "cacheWrite": 4352, + "totalTokens": 12048, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277196478 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11NX1QPQKWD1ED133FMX", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.480Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11NX1QPQKWD1ED133FMX", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.480Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277196482 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11NX1QPQKWD1ED133FMX", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.482Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277196482 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11NX1QPQKWD1ED133FMX", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.482Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + } + }, + "durationMs": 2, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11NX1QPQKWD1ED133FMX", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.483Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11NX1QPQKWD1ED133FMX", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277196259:w7ifjt8t43", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4352, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3314, + "cacheWrite": 4352, + "totalTokens": 12048, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277196478 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277196482 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.484Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11P5ETPXS6JXGRDFCS6J", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.485Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11P5ETPXS6JXGRDFCS6J", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277196259:w7ifjt8t43", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.485Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277196259:w7ifjt8t43", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 32, + "cacheRead": 6950, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16772, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277196259 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11P5ETPXS6JXGRDFCS6J", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.486Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "What decision should", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11P5ETPXS6JXGRDFCS6J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.489Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " this model ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11P5ETPXS6JXGRDFCS6J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.489Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "support, and can you", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11P5ETPXS6JXGRDFCS6J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.489Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " walk me through the", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11P5ETPXS6JXGRDFCS6J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.489Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " last approv", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11P5ETPXS6JXGRDFCS6J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.489Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "al request from subm", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11P5ETPXS6JXGRDFCS6J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.489Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ission to its outcom", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11P5ETPXS6JXGRDFCS6J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 57, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.489Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "e?", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11P5ETPXS6JXGRDFCS6J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 58, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.489Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11P5ETPXS6JXGRDFCS6J", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277196259:w7ifjt8t43", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?" + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 32, + "cacheRead": 6950, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16772, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 59, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.489Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277196259:w7ifjt8t43", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 32, + "cacheRead": 6950, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16772, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277196259 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11P5ETPXS6JXGRDFCS6J", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 60, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.489Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET11P5ETPXS6JXGRDFCS6J", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277196259:w7ifjt8t43", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 32, + "cacheRead": 6950, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16772, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277196259 + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 61, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.491Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277196259:w7ifjt8t43", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2896, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2896, + "totalTokens": 5803, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277196259 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277196465 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277196259:w7ifjt8t43", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1850, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 2180, + "cacheWrite": 1850, + "totalTokens": 5911, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277196470 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277196475 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277196259:w7ifjt8t43", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4352, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3314, + "cacheWrite": 4352, + "totalTokens": 12048, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277196478 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277196482 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277196259:w7ifjt8t43", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 32, + "cacheRead": 6950, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16772, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277196259 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 62, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.491Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 42, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 63, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.492Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET11MCAH8HC0F7QWNG425N", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET11N2D538ZPNGCDCE5C4E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 64, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.492Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET11M90PEQ2WKRS1JQJX4B", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "9f12d2d0519acb72ea8d94df37b0bb588c23efc33442f1e04c04d0d533a9022c", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 65, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:56.492Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "82356eb4e0aab1634c21d96a36e834394fe9987e7445a26b84c6fd1c497763ab", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "df514bda6fbedcbcf09b8bd8b148716cb8a3297293a8cd4e18ec47e566c46b62", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "a67aa0c87bdc8e72c0bcbbe4cad603ed264809957b56b9c0ccef4032ae08cf0e", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "21bf274423e833c1e4a4af5f747978a4c3c3db2815da973a4894c8e72dba88de", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/scenarios.json": "10e5b6897319045485a33e556d1de05241cbdbe9ddf5e8fa6c72ef73199252c1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/protocol.md": "476984da4bd65f21717dff1c450a82e86017ef0652b03b778c0691e585aabf0a", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md": "c16d5faaa7a450a41d6888dd6d2b3eac88e4687779b0c8f8e6fe4eceeeb241c6", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "b4959142f10c74e9b04a5d0c0dfb3b74dbab8c492a26e34d2c2c8ff9e3eb7cfa" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "a4b0261917a6627172e83b87f31142fb905758a8a7f7a7f000781c1fba880f34", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "63adaa3aa89e11862add6537e33c87fdb548bd058c7dac54fa67a5a28cc20b3c", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/packaged-S2.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/packaged-S2.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..85bb783d27f --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/packaged-S2.json @@ -0,0 +1,2963 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-packaged-s2-0eb77a4b", + "phase": "hermetic", + "candidate": "packaged", + "scenarioId": "S2", + "scenario": { + "title": "Adequate construct-only request", + "prompt": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them.", + "stopAfter": "The first consequential construction decision.", + "expected": "Enter construction guidance without loading universal elicitation or asking a question." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome.", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md" + }, + "output": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md" + }, + "output": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [ + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md", + "sha256": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694" + }, + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md", + "sha256": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5" + } + ], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 3, + "inputTokens": 3185, + "outputTokens": 11, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 3185, + "totalTokens": 6381, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3, + "inputTokens": 1850, + "outputTokens": 29, + "cacheReadTokens": 2469, + "cacheWriteTokens": 1850, + "totalTokens": 6198, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 2, + "inputTokens": 3142, + "outputTokens": 27, + "cacheReadTokens": 3603, + "cacheWriteTokens": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9914, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 5, + "inputTokens": 2000, + "outputTokens": 46, + "cacheReadTokens": 6029, + "cacheWriteTokens": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10075, + "cost": 0 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 13, + "inputTokens": 10177, + "outputTokens": 113, + "cacheReadTokens": 12101, + "cacheWriteTokens": 10177, + "totalTokens": 32568, + "cost": 0 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nUse the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them.\n\n## Assistant\nFirst, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome.\n- tool activate_skill (activate-sdcpn): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-pn-construction.md): \"# SDCPN Construction\\n\\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\\n\\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\\n\\n## Construction boundary\\n\\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\\n\\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\\n\\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\\n\\n## Mapping principles\\n\\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\\n| --- | --- |\\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\\n\\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\\n\\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\\n\\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\\n\\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\\n\\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\\n\\n## Construction patterns\\n\\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\\n\\n### Timed work\\n\\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\\n\\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\\n\\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\\n\\n### Contended resource\\n\\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\\n\\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\\n\\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\\n\\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\\n\\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\\n\\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\\n\\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\\n\\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\\n\\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\\n\\n### Mode change\\n\\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\\n\\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\\n\\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\\n\\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\\n\\n### Spatial transfer\\n\\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\\n\\n### Hidden waiting\\n\\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\\n\\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\\n\\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\\n\\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\\n\\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\\n\\nNot acceptable:\\n\\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\\n\\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\\n\\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\\n\\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\\n\\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\\n\\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-checks.md): \"# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\\n\\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\\n\\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\\n\\n## Before construction\\n\\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\\n\\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\\n\\n## During construction\\n\\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\\n\\n## Structural validity\\n\\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\\n\\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\\n\\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\\n\\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\\n\\n## Existing-net revision\\n\\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\\n\\n## Delivery\\n\\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\\n\\nState plainly:\\n\\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\\n\\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000024", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFFVDEyNlRSMU0ySjg5NFNQTjUwRzFF", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1ET127V23H8ARH7KCQ51ANZ", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET127SBHMKR641HG7K5PQC", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 4 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md" + }, + "output": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n", + "durationMs": 1 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md" + }, + "output": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n", + "durationMs": 1 + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1ET126V3AV4ZJ93XTKEPDDY" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.020Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.023Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.044Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.049Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET127SBHMKR641HG7K5PQC", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.049Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET127SBHMKR641HG7K5PQC", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277196840:ticcl6x7rgi", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.050Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277196840:ticcl6x7rgi", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3185, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3185, + "totalTokens": 6381, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277196841 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET127SBHMKR641HG7K5PQC", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.052Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\":\"sdcpn-model", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET127SBHMKR641HG7K5PQC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.052Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "ling\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET127SBHMKR641HG7K5PQC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.052Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET127SBHMKR641HG7K5PQC", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277196840:ticcl6x7rgi", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3185, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3185, + "totalTokens": 6381, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.053Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277196840:ticcl6x7rgi", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3185, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3185, + "totalTokens": 6381, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277196841 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET127SBHMKR641HG7K5PQC", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.054Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET127SBHMKR641HG7K5PQC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.056Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277197059 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET127SBHMKR641HG7K5PQC", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.059Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277197059 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET127SBHMKR641HG7K5PQC", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.059Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 4, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET127SBHMKR641HG7K5PQC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.061Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET127SBHMKR641HG7K5PQC", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277196840:ticcl6x7rgi", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3185, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3185, + "totalTokens": 6381, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277196841 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277197059 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.061Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12869XJESERJVBQTEYWT", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.062Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12869XJESERJVBQTEYWT", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277196840:ticcl6x7rgi", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.062Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277196840:ticcl6x7rgi", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1850, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2469, + "cacheWrite": 1850, + "totalTokens": 6198, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277197063 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12869XJESERJVBQTEYWT", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.064Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.f", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12869XJESERJVBQTEYWT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.064Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "lue/packaged-skills/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12869XJESERJVBQTEYWT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.064Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "skill%3Asdcpn-mo", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12869XJESERJVBQTEYWT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.064Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "delling%3A47e2d994e6", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12869XJESERJVBQTEYWT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.065Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "934a99/pn-co", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12869XJESERJVBQTEYWT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.065Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "nstruction.md\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12869XJESERJVBQTEYWT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.065Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12869XJESERJVBQTEYWT", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277196840:ticcl6x7rgi", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 1850, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2469, + "cacheWrite": 1850, + "totalTokens": 6198, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.065Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277196840:ticcl6x7rgi", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1850, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2469, + "cacheWrite": 1850, + "totalTokens": 6198, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277197063 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12869XJESERJVBQTEYWT", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.065Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12869XJESERJVBQTEYWT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.066Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277197067 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12869XJESERJVBQTEYWT", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.067Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277197067 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12869XJESERJVBQTEYWT", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.067Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + } + }, + "durationMs": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12869XJESERJVBQTEYWT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.068Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12869XJESERJVBQTEYWT", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277196840:ticcl6x7rgi", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1850, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2469, + "cacheWrite": 1850, + "totalTokens": 6198, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277197063 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277197067 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.069Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET128DGTJD4RT1D2PPZAPY", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.069Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET128DGTJD4RT1D2PPZAPY", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277196840:ticcl6x7rgi", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.069Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277196840:ticcl6x7rgi", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3603, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9914, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277197070 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET128DGTJD4RT1D2PPZAPY", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.070Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.flue/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET128DGTJD4RT1D2PPZAPY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.071Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "packaged-skills/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET128DGTJD4RT1D2PPZAPY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.071Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "skill%3Asdcp", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET128DGTJD4RT1D2PPZAPY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.071Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "n-modelling%3A47", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET128DGTJD4RT1D2PPZAPY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.071Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "e2d994e6934a99/check", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET128DGTJD4RT1D2PPZAPY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.071Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "s.md\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET128DGTJD4RT1D2PPZAPY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.071Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET128DGTJD4RT1D2PPZAPY", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 2, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277196840:ticcl6x7rgi", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3603, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9914, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.071Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277196840:ticcl6x7rgi", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3603, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9914, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277197070 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET128DGTJD4RT1D2PPZAPY", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.071Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET128DGTJD4RT1D2PPZAPY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.072Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277197073 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET128DGTJD4RT1D2PPZAPY", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.073Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277197073 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET128DGTJD4RT1D2PPZAPY", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.073Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + } + }, + "durationMs": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET128DGTJD4RT1D2PPZAPY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.074Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET128DGTJD4RT1D2PPZAPY", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277196840:ticcl6x7rgi", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3603, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9914, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277197070 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277197073 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.075Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET128KJYQAQXZKF9TGHDZF", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.075Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET128KJYQAQXZKF9TGHDZF", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277196840:ticcl6x7rgi", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.075Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277196840:ticcl6x7rgi", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 46, + "cacheRead": 6029, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10075, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277196841 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET128KJYQAQXZKF9TGHDZF", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.076Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "First, factor the ti", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET128KJYQAQXZKF9TGHDZF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.079Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "med review into ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET128KJYQAQXZKF9TGHDZF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.079Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "start, in-progress, ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET128KJYQAQXZKF9TGHDZF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.079Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "approval, and reject", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET128KJYQAQXZKF9TGHDZF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.079Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ion transiti", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET128KJYQAQXZKF9TGHDZF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.079Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ons so the reviewer ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET128KJYQAQXZKF9TGHDZF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.079Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "token is reserve", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET128KJYQAQXZKF9TGHDZF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.079Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "d during the", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET128KJYQAQXZKF9TGHDZF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 57, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.079Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " 20-minute check and", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET128KJYQAQXZKF9TGHDZF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 58, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.079Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " returned on either ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET128KJYQAQXZKF9TGHDZF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 59, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.079Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "outcome.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET128KJYQAQXZKF9TGHDZF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 60, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.079Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET128KJYQAQXZKF9TGHDZF", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 5, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277196840:ticcl6x7rgi", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome." + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 46, + "cacheRead": 6029, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10075, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 61, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.080Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277196840:ticcl6x7rgi", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 46, + "cacheRead": 6029, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10075, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277196841 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET128KJYQAQXZKF9TGHDZF", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 62, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.080Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET128KJYQAQXZKF9TGHDZF", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277196840:ticcl6x7rgi", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 46, + "cacheRead": 6029, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10075, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277196841 + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 63, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.081Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277196840:ticcl6x7rgi", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3185, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3185, + "totalTokens": 6381, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277196841 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277197059 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277196840:ticcl6x7rgi", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1850, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2469, + "cacheWrite": 1850, + "totalTokens": 6198, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277197063 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277197067 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277196840:ticcl6x7rgi", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3603, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9914, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277197070 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277197073 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277196840:ticcl6x7rgi", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 46, + "cacheRead": 6029, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10075, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277196841 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 64, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.081Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 38, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 65, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.082Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET126W81C58Y253E7QYMX8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET127MMDP12X5RN362MWTT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 66, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.082Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET126TR1M2J894SPN50G1E", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "d53e29c3e69dba25597f57abfec7b2f414257401a089bd0f55af4af7314ddf1c", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 67, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.082Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "82356eb4e0aab1634c21d96a36e834394fe9987e7445a26b84c6fd1c497763ab", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "df514bda6fbedcbcf09b8bd8b148716cb8a3297293a8cd4e18ec47e566c46b62", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "a67aa0c87bdc8e72c0bcbbe4cad603ed264809957b56b9c0ccef4032ae08cf0e", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "21bf274423e833c1e4a4af5f747978a4c3c3db2815da973a4894c8e72dba88de", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/scenarios.json": "10e5b6897319045485a33e556d1de05241cbdbe9ddf5e8fa6c72ef73199252c1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/protocol.md": "476984da4bd65f21717dff1c450a82e86017ef0652b03b778c0691e585aabf0a", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md": "c16d5faaa7a450a41d6888dd6d2b3eac88e4687779b0c8f8e6fe4eceeeb241c6", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "b4959142f10c74e9b04a5d0c0dfb3b74dbab8c492a26e34d2c2c8ff9e3eb7cfa" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "a4b0261917a6627172e83b87f31142fb905758a8a7f7a7f000781c1fba880f34", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "63adaa3aa89e11862add6537e33c87fdb548bd058c7dac54fa67a5a28cc20b3c", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/packaged-S3.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/packaged-S3.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3f53618e0cc --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/packaged-S3.json @@ -0,0 +1,2963 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-packaged-s3-e4b8eb72", + "phase": "hermetic", + "candidate": "packaged", + "scenarioId": "S3", + "scenario": { + "title": "Review with a resolvable target defect", + "prompt": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token.", + "stopAfter": "The first supported defect finding.", + "expected": "Identify the missing reviewer return on rejection without loading universal elicitation." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer.", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md" + }, + "output": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md" + }, + "output": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [ + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md", + "sha256": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694" + }, + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md", + "sha256": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5" + } + ], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 4, + "inputTokens": 3057, + "outputTokens": 11, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 3057, + "totalTokens": 6125, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3, + "inputTokens": 1850, + "outputTokens": 29, + "cacheReadTokens": 2342, + "cacheWriteTokens": 1850, + "totalTokens": 6071, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 2, + "inputTokens": 3142, + "outputTokens": 27, + "cacheReadTokens": 3476, + "cacheWriteTokens": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9787, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 4, + "inputTokens": 2000, + "outputTokens": 45, + "cacheReadTokens": 5902, + "cacheWriteTokens": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9947, + "cost": 0 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 13, + "inputTokens": 10049, + "outputTokens": 112, + "cacheReadTokens": 11720, + "cacheWriteTokens": 10049, + "totalTokens": 31930, + "cost": 0 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nReview the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token.\n\n## Assistant\nThe rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer.\n- tool activate_skill (activate-sdcpn): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-pn-construction.md): \"# SDCPN Construction\\n\\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\\n\\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\\n\\n## Construction boundary\\n\\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\\n\\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\\n\\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\\n\\n## Mapping principles\\n\\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\\n| --- | --- |\\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\\n\\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\\n\\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\\n\\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\\n\\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\\n\\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\\n\\n## Construction patterns\\n\\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\\n\\n### Timed work\\n\\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\\n\\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\\n\\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\\n\\n### Contended resource\\n\\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\\n\\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\\n\\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\\n\\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\\n\\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\\n\\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\\n\\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\\n\\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\\n\\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\\n\\n### Mode change\\n\\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\\n\\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\\n\\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\\n\\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\\n\\n### Spatial transfer\\n\\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\\n\\n### Hidden waiting\\n\\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\\n\\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\\n\\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\\n\\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\\n\\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\\n\\nNot acceptable:\\n\\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\\n\\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\\n\\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\\n\\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\\n\\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\\n\\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-checks.md): \"# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\\n\\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\\n\\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\\n\\n## Before construction\\n\\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\\n\\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\\n\\n## During construction\\n\\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\\n\\n## Structural validity\\n\\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\\n\\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\\n\\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\\n\\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\\n\\n## Existing-net revision\\n\\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\\n\\n## Delivery\\n\\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\\n\\nState plainly:\\n\\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\\n\\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000024", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFFVDEyUlo3NzBDVEpaUFg2SlBKSzVE", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1ET12SZ9J6BJNE3B0TJQ9NN", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12SY7RXKPXS82K0K3ZPG", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 4 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md" + }, + "output": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n", + "durationMs": 1 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md" + }, + "output": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n", + "durationMs": 1 + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1ET12RZDYBS2W67SCFEJE15" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.601Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.604Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.624Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.629Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12SY7RXKPXS82K0K3ZPG", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.630Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12SY7RXKPXS82K0K3ZPG", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277197422:gk2szrppgrf", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.630Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277197422:gk2szrppgrf", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3057, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3057, + "totalTokens": 6125, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277197422 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12SY7RXKPXS82K0K3ZPG", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.632Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\":\"sdcpn-m", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12SY7RXKPXS82K0K3ZPG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.632Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "odelling\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12SY7RXKPXS82K0K3ZPG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.633Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12SY7RXKPXS82K0K3ZPG", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277197422:gk2szrppgrf", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3057, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3057, + "totalTokens": 6125, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.634Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277197422:gk2szrppgrf", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3057, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3057, + "totalTokens": 6125, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277197422 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12SY7RXKPXS82K0K3ZPG", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.634Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12SY7RXKPXS82K0K3ZPG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.636Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277197639 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12SY7RXKPXS82K0K3ZPG", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.639Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277197639 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12SY7RXKPXS82K0K3ZPG", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.639Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 4, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12SY7RXKPXS82K0K3ZPG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.640Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12SY7RXKPXS82K0K3ZPG", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277197422:gk2szrppgrf", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3057, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3057, + "totalTokens": 6125, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277197422 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277197639 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.640Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12TAM99P0NYKR9RB85F2", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.642Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12TAM99P0NYKR9RB85F2", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277197422:gk2szrppgrf", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.642Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277197422:gk2szrppgrf", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1850, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2342, + "cacheWrite": 1850, + "totalTokens": 6071, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277197643 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12TAM99P0NYKR9RB85F2", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.644Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.f", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12TAM99P0NYKR9RB85F2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.644Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "lue/packaged-skills/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12TAM99P0NYKR9RB85F2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.644Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "skill%3Asdcpn-mo", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12TAM99P0NYKR9RB85F2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.644Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "delling%3A47e2d994e6", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12TAM99P0NYKR9RB85F2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.644Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "934a99/pn-constr", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12TAM99P0NYKR9RB85F2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.644Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "uction.md\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12TAM99P0NYKR9RB85F2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.644Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12TAM99P0NYKR9RB85F2", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277197422:gk2szrppgrf", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 1850, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2342, + "cacheWrite": 1850, + "totalTokens": 6071, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.645Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277197422:gk2szrppgrf", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1850, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2342, + "cacheWrite": 1850, + "totalTokens": 6071, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277197643 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12TAM99P0NYKR9RB85F2", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.645Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12TAM99P0NYKR9RB85F2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.646Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277197647 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12TAM99P0NYKR9RB85F2", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.647Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277197647 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12TAM99P0NYKR9RB85F2", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.647Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + } + }, + "durationMs": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12TAM99P0NYKR9RB85F2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.648Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12TAM99P0NYKR9RB85F2", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277197422:gk2szrppgrf", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1850, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2342, + "cacheWrite": 1850, + "totalTokens": 6071, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277197643 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277197647 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.648Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12THQFYQ97JE2034BG5E", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.649Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12THQFYQ97JE2034BG5E", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277197422:gk2szrppgrf", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.649Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277197422:gk2szrppgrf", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3476, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9787, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277197650 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12THQFYQ97JE2034BG5E", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.650Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.flue/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12THQFYQ97JE2034BG5E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.650Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "packaged-skills/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12THQFYQ97JE2034BG5E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.650Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "skill%3Asdcpn-modell", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12THQFYQ97JE2034BG5E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.651Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "ing%3A47e2d994e6", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12THQFYQ97JE2034BG5E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.651Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "934a99/check", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12THQFYQ97JE2034BG5E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.651Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "s.md\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12THQFYQ97JE2034BG5E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.651Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12THQFYQ97JE2034BG5E", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 2, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277197422:gk2szrppgrf", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3476, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9787, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.651Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277197422:gk2szrppgrf", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3476, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9787, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277197650 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12THQFYQ97JE2034BG5E", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.651Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12THQFYQ97JE2034BG5E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.652Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277197653 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12THQFYQ97JE2034BG5E", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.653Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277197653 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12THQFYQ97JE2034BG5E", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.654Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + } + }, + "durationMs": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12THQFYQ97JE2034BG5E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.654Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12THQFYQ97JE2034BG5E", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277197422:gk2szrppgrf", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3476, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9787, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277197650 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277197653 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.655Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12TQ8ERXKWXXK4GCVV83", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.655Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12TQ8ERXKWXXK4GCVV83", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277197422:gk2szrppgrf", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.655Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277197422:gk2szrppgrf", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 45, + "cacheRead": 5902, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9947, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277197422 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12TQ8ERXKWXXK4GCVV83", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.656Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "The rejection pa", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12TQ8ERXKWXXK4GCVV83", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.659Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "th leaks the reusabl", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12TQ8ERXKWXXK4GCVV83", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.659Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "e reviewer token: th", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12TQ8ERXKWXXK4GCVV83", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.659Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "e account requires r", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12TQ8ERXKWXXK4GCVV83", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.659Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "elease after eit", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12TQ8ERXKWXXK4GCVV83", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.659Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "her outcome,", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12TQ8ERXKWXXK4GCVV83", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.659Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " but RecordRejec", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12TQ8ERXKWXXK4GCVV83", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.659Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "tion has no outp", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12TQ8ERXKWXXK4GCVV83", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 57, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.659Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ut arc returning it ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12TQ8ERXKWXXK4GCVV83", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 58, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.659Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "to Available", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12TQ8ERXKWXXK4GCVV83", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 59, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.659Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "Reviewer.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12TQ8ERXKWXXK4GCVV83", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 60, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.659Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12TQ8ERXKWXXK4GCVV83", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277197422:gk2szrppgrf", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer." + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 45, + "cacheRead": 5902, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9947, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 61, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.659Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277197422:gk2szrppgrf", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 45, + "cacheRead": 5902, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9947, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277197422 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12TQ8ERXKWXXK4GCVV83", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 62, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.659Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET12TQ8ERXKWXXK4GCVV83", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277197422:gk2szrppgrf", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 45, + "cacheRead": 5902, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9947, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277197422 + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 63, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.661Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277197422:gk2szrppgrf", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3057, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3057, + "totalTokens": 6125, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277197422 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277197639 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277197422:gk2szrppgrf", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1850, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2342, + "cacheWrite": 1850, + "totalTokens": 6071, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277197643 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277197647 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277197422:gk2szrppgrf", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3476, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9787, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277197650 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277197653 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277197422:gk2szrppgrf", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 45, + "cacheRead": 5902, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9947, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277197422 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 64, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.661Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 38, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 65, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.662Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET12S1Z6E5Z161906GDW5M", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET12SRD7VMY55FDDERWQ8Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 66, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.662Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET12RZ770CTJZPX6JPJK5D", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "e86ed395ebedacd3a1a872743dc6976f7f44997c551cc6e2def9e82dafae4579", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 67, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:57.662Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "82356eb4e0aab1634c21d96a36e834394fe9987e7445a26b84c6fd1c497763ab", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "df514bda6fbedcbcf09b8bd8b148716cb8a3297293a8cd4e18ec47e566c46b62", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "a67aa0c87bdc8e72c0bcbbe4cad603ed264809957b56b9c0ccef4032ae08cf0e", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "21bf274423e833c1e4a4af5f747978a4c3c3db2815da973a4894c8e72dba88de", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/scenarios.json": "10e5b6897319045485a33e556d1de05241cbdbe9ddf5e8fa6c72ef73199252c1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/protocol.md": "476984da4bd65f21717dff1c450a82e86017ef0652b03b778c0691e585aabf0a", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md": "c16d5faaa7a450a41d6888dd6d2b3eac88e4687779b0c8f8e6fe4eceeeb241c6", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "b4959142f10c74e9b04a5d0c0dfb3b74dbab8c492a26e34d2c2c8ff9e3eb7cfa" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "a4b0261917a6627172e83b87f31142fb905758a8a7f7a7f000781c1fba880f34", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "63adaa3aa89e11862add6537e33c87fdb548bd058c7dac54fa67a5a28cc20b3c", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/packaged-S4.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/packaged-S4.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2bc556966dc --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/hermetic/packaged-S4.json @@ -0,0 +1,2965 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-packaged-s4-ab5f3d11", + "phase": "hermetic", + "candidate": "packaged", + "scenarioId": "S4", + "scenario": { + "title": "Review exposing a human-knowledge gap", + "prompt": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately.", + "stopAfter": "One focused question about the unresolved release distinction.", + "expected": "Load universal elicitation and ask whether rejection releases the reviewer or retains assignment through appeal." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "When a request is rejected, does that immediately free the reviewer for another request, or do they remain assigned through an appeal window?", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [ + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md", + "sha256": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "sha256": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf" + } + ], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 4, + "inputTokens": 3034, + "outputTokens": 11, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 3034, + "totalTokens": 6079, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3, + "inputTokens": 1850, + "outputTokens": 31, + "cacheReadTokens": 2319, + "cacheWriteTokens": 1850, + "totalTokens": 6050, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 2, + "inputTokens": 4351, + "outputTokens": 30, + "cacheReadTokens": 3453, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4352, + "totalTokens": 12186, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 5, + "inputTokens": 4895, + "outputTokens": 36, + "cacheReadTokens": 7089, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16915, + "cost": 0 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 14, + "inputTokens": 14130, + "outputTokens": 108, + "cacheReadTokens": 12861, + "cacheWriteTokens": 14131, + "totalTokens": 41230, + "cost": 0 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nReview the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately.\n\n## Assistant\nWhen a request is rejected, does that immediately free the reviewer for another request, or do they remain assigned through an appeal window?\n- tool activate_skill (activate-sdcpn): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-universal-elicitation.md): \"# Universal Elicitation Reference\\n\\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\\n\\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Work from purpose\\n\\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\\n\\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\\n\\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\\n\\n### Follow the person's account\\n\\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\\n\\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\\n\\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\\n\\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\\n\\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\\n\\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\\n\\n### Treat divergence as information\\n\\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\\n\\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\\n\\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\\n\\n### Stop honestly\\n\\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\\n\\n### Vague or compressed language\\n\\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\\n\\n### Normative language\\n\\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\\n\\n### Tension within or between accounts\\n\\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\\n\\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\\n\\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\\n\\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\\n\\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\\n\\n### Diminishing yield\\n\\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\\n\\n### Assent without independent wording\\n\\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\\n\\n### Silence and absence\\n\\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\\n\\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\\n\\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\\n\\n### Slice a concrete case\\n\\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\\n\\n### Sweep one property\\n\\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\\n\\n### Ask for the last occurrence\\n\\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\\n\\n### Ask for the basis\\n\\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\\n\\n### Ground a term or artifact\\n\\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\\n\\n### Clarify until observable\\n\\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\\n\\n### Use contrastive cases\\n\\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\\n\\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\\n\\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\\n\\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\\n\\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\\n\\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\\n\\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\\n\\n### Restate for correction\\n\\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\\n\\n### Propose structure for correction\\n\\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\\n\\n### Deposit and defer\\n\\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\\n\\n### Press without trapping\\n\\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\\n\\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\\n\\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\\n\\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\\n\\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\\n\\n### Trade concrete outcomes\\n\\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\\n\\n### Close with one correction opportunity\\n\\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\\n\\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\\n\\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\\n\\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\\n\\n### Before asking\\n\\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\\n\\n### Before recording\\n\\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\\n\\n### Before closing\\n\\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-sdcpn-elicitation.md): \"# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\\n\\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\\n\\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\\n\\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\\n\\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\\n\\n### Keep target structure backstage\\n\\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\\n\\n### Preserve operational context\\n\\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\\n\\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\\n\\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\\n\\n### Language and account signals\\n\\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\\n\\n### Operational situation patterns\\n\\n#### Timed work\\n\\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\\n\\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\\n\\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\\n\\n#### Contended resource\\n\\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\\n\\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\\n\\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\\n\\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\\n\\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\\n\\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\\n\\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\\n\\n#### Mode change\\n\\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\\n\\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\\n\\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\\n\\n#### Spatial transfer\\n\\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\\n\\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\\n\\n#### Policy under pressure\\n\\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\\n\\n#### Hidden waiting\\n\\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\\n\\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\\n\\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\\n\\n### Link the slice to the objective\\n\\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\\n\\n### Expose the process spine\\n\\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\\n\\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\\n\\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\\n\\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\\n\\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\\n\\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\\n\\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\\n\\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\\n\\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\\n\\n### Close a resource account\\n\\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\\n\\n### Close a mode change in both directions\\n\\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\\n\\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\\n\\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\\n\\n### Ask what is conserved\\n\\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\\n\\n### Establish retry scope\\n\\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\\n\\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\\n\\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\\n\\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\\n\\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\\n\\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\\n\\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\\n\\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\\n\\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\\n\\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\\n\\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\\n\\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\\n\\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\\n\\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\\n\\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\\n\\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\\n\\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\\n\\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\\n\\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\\n\\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\\n\\n### Purpose and process\\n\\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\\n\\n### Operational semantics\\n\\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\\n\\n### Quantities and context\\n\\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000024", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFFVDEzQkNaREpWWEtSREtFM0JFWUFa", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1ET13CC76HFJ4KHPNXANC61", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CAVSZ9HQ5TMNGEJKFZ", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 4 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n", + "durationMs": 1 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "When a request is rejected, does that immediately free the reviewer for another request, or do they remain assigned through an appeal window?", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1ET13BDPAWSPHH6RRK2NWG4" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.190Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.193Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.213Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.218Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CAVSZ9HQ5TMNGEJKFZ", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.218Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CAVSZ9HQ5TMNGEJKFZ", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277198011:fs6c5p896q", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.218Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277198011:fs6c5p896q", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3034, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3034, + "totalTokens": 6079, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277198011 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CAVSZ9HQ5TMNGEJKFZ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.221Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\":\"sdc", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CAVSZ9HQ5TMNGEJKFZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.221Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "pn-modelling\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CAVSZ9HQ5TMNGEJKFZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.221Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CAVSZ9HQ5TMNGEJKFZ", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277198011:fs6c5p896q", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3034, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3034, + "totalTokens": 6079, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.222Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277198011:fs6c5p896q", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3034, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3034, + "totalTokens": 6079, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277198011 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CAVSZ9HQ5TMNGEJKFZ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.223Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CAVSZ9HQ5TMNGEJKFZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.225Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277198227 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CAVSZ9HQ5TMNGEJKFZ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.227Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277198227 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CAVSZ9HQ5TMNGEJKFZ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.227Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 4, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CAVSZ9HQ5TMNGEJKFZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.229Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CAVSZ9HQ5TMNGEJKFZ", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277198011:fs6c5p896q", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3034, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3034, + "totalTokens": 6079, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277198011 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277198227 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.230Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CQ88KK3RWGRRF3SJ5K", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.231Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CQ88KK3RWGRRF3SJ5K", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277198011:fs6c5p896q", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.231Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277198011:fs6c5p896q", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1850, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 2319, + "cacheWrite": 1850, + "totalTokens": 6050, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277198231 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CQ88KK3RWGRRF3SJ5K", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.232Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.flue/pack", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CQ88KK3RWGRRF3SJ5K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.233Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "aged-skills/skill%3A", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CQ88KK3RWGRRF3SJ5K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.233Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "sdcpn-modelling%", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CQ88KK3RWGRRF3SJ5K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.233Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "3A47e2d994e6934a99/u", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CQ88KK3RWGRRF3SJ5K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.233Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "niversal-elicitation", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CQ88KK3RWGRRF3SJ5K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.233Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": ".md\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CQ88KK3RWGRRF3SJ5K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.233Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CQ88KK3RWGRRF3SJ5K", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277198011:fs6c5p896q", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 1850, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 2319, + "cacheWrite": 1850, + "totalTokens": 6050, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.234Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277198011:fs6c5p896q", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1850, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 2319, + "cacheWrite": 1850, + "totalTokens": 6050, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277198231 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CQ88KK3RWGRRF3SJ5K", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.234Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CQ88KK3RWGRRF3SJ5K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.235Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277198236 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CQ88KK3RWGRRF3SJ5K", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.236Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277198236 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CQ88KK3RWGRRF3SJ5K", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.237Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + } + }, + "durationMs": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CQ88KK3RWGRRF3SJ5K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.237Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CQ88KK3RWGRRF3SJ5K", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277198011:fs6c5p896q", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1850, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 2319, + "cacheWrite": 1850, + "totalTokens": 6050, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277198231 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277198236 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.238Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CZPMD5KQFG8SMW48KQ", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.239Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CZPMD5KQFG8SMW48KQ", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277198011:fs6c5p896q", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.239Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277198011:fs6c5p896q", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4351, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3453, + "cacheWrite": 4352, + "totalTokens": 12186, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277198239 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CZPMD5KQFG8SMW48KQ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.240Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.flue/pack", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CZPMD5KQFG8SMW48KQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.240Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "aged-skills/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CZPMD5KQFG8SMW48KQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.240Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "skill%3Asdcpn-modell", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CZPMD5KQFG8SMW48KQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.240Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "ing%3A47e2d994e6934a", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CZPMD5KQFG8SMW48KQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.240Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "99/sdcpn-eli", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CZPMD5KQFG8SMW48KQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.240Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "citation.md\"", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CZPMD5KQFG8SMW48KQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.240Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CZPMD5KQFG8SMW48KQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.240Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CZPMD5KQFG8SMW48KQ", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 2, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277198011:fs6c5p896q", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 4351, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3453, + "cacheWrite": 4352, + "totalTokens": 12186, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.241Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277198011:fs6c5p896q", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4351, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3453, + "cacheWrite": 4352, + "totalTokens": 12186, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277198239 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CZPMD5KQFG8SMW48KQ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.241Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CZPMD5KQFG8SMW48KQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.241Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277198243 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CZPMD5KQFG8SMW48KQ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.243Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277198243 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CZPMD5KQFG8SMW48KQ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.243Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + } + }, + "durationMs": 2, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CZPMD5KQFG8SMW48KQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.244Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13CZPMD5KQFG8SMW48KQ", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277198011:fs6c5p896q", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4351, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3453, + "cacheWrite": 4352, + "totalTokens": 12186, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277198239 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277198243 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.245Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13D6T6MY0FHRHHNZE3JD", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.246Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13D6T6MY0FHRHHNZE3JD", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277198011:fs6c5p896q", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.246Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277198011:fs6c5p896q", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 36, + "cacheRead": 7089, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16915, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277198011 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13D6T6MY0FHRHHNZE3JD", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.247Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "When a request i", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13D6T6MY0FHRHHNZE3JD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.250Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "s rejected, ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13D6T6MY0FHRHHNZE3JD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.250Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "does that immediatel", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13D6T6MY0FHRHHNZE3JD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.250Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "y free the revie", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13D6T6MY0FHRHHNZE3JD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.250Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "wer for anot", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13D6T6MY0FHRHHNZE3JD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.250Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "her request,", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13D6T6MY0FHRHHNZE3JD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.250Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " or do they rema", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13D6T6MY0FHRHHNZE3JD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 57, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.250Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "in assigned thro", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13D6T6MY0FHRHHNZE3JD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 58, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.250Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ugh an appeal wi", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13D6T6MY0FHRHHNZE3JD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 59, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.250Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ndow?", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13D6T6MY0FHRHHNZE3JD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 60, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.250Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13D6T6MY0FHRHHNZE3JD", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 5, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277198011:fs6c5p896q", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "When a request is rejected, does that immediately free the reviewer for another request, or do they remain assigned through an appeal window?" + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 36, + "cacheRead": 7089, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16915, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 61, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.251Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "When a request is rejected, does that immediately free the reviewer for another request, or do they remain assigned through an appeal window?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277198011:fs6c5p896q", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 36, + "cacheRead": 7089, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16915, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277198011 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13D6T6MY0FHRHHNZE3JD", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 62, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.251Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET13D6T6MY0FHRHHNZE3JD", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "When a request is rejected, does that immediately free the reviewer for another request, or do they remain assigned through an appeal window?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277198011:fs6c5p896q", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 36, + "cacheRead": 7089, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16915, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277198011 + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 63, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.252Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277198011:fs6c5p896q", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3034, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3034, + "totalTokens": 6079, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277198011 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277198227 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277198011:fs6c5p896q", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1850, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 2319, + "cacheWrite": 1850, + "totalTokens": 6050, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277198231 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277198236 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277198011:fs6c5p896q", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4351, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3453, + "cacheWrite": 4352, + "totalTokens": 12186, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277198239 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277198243 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "When a request is rejected, does that immediately free the reviewer for another request, or do they remain assigned through an appeal window?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277198011:fs6c5p896q", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 36, + "cacheRead": 7089, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16915, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277198011 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 64, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.253Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 40, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 65, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.253Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET13BE8M5BQJ2F2HA26RDR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET13C5V6ARVVYS4B9RW2C9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 66, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.253Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET13BCZDJVXKRDKE3BEYAZ", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "1ae403738da963be55ee3f10a6b5de1be4d62ed1845677d12a5b590f7245d022", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 67, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:39:58.254Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "82356eb4e0aab1634c21d96a36e834394fe9987e7445a26b84c6fd1c497763ab", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "df514bda6fbedcbcf09b8bd8b148716cb8a3297293a8cd4e18ec47e566c46b62", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "a67aa0c87bdc8e72c0bcbbe4cad603ed264809957b56b9c0ccef4032ae08cf0e", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "21bf274423e833c1e4a4af5f747978a4c3c3db2815da973a4894c8e72dba88de", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/scenarios.json": "10e5b6897319045485a33e556d1de05241cbdbe9ddf5e8fa6c72ef73199252c1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/protocol.md": "476984da4bd65f21717dff1c450a82e86017ef0652b03b778c0691e585aabf0a", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md": "c16d5faaa7a450a41d6888dd6d2b3eac88e4687779b0c8f8e6fe4eceeeb241c6", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "b4959142f10c74e9b04a5d0c0dfb3b74dbab8c492a26e34d2c2c8ff9e3eb7cfa" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "a4b0261917a6627172e83b87f31142fb905758a8a7f7a7f000781c1fba880f34", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "63adaa3aa89e11862add6537e33c87fdb548bd058c7dac54fa67a5a28cc20b3c", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/paid/independent-S1.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/paid/independent-S1.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a2faedbcc34 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/paid/independent-S1.json @@ -0,0 +1,1882 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-independent-s1-066024bc", + "phase": "paid", + "candidate": "independent", + "scenarioId": "S1", + "scenario": { + "title": "Underspecified interactive request", + "prompt": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "stopAfter": "The first consequential question.", + "expected": "Ask one high-yield question in operational vocabulary after loading universal and SDCPN elicitation judgment." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "I'll help you model your approval process as an SDCPN. Let me first load the detailed guidance for SDCPN modelling.\n\nGood—I have the detailed guidance. Let me start by establishing the context and scope of your approval process, so I can elicit the right details and model it at the right level.\n\n**A few quick orientation questions:**\n\n1. **What kind of approvals** are we modeling—document reviews, purchase requests, hiring decisions, something else? \n\n2. **Who needs to see this model**, and what will they do with it—is this for process improvement, documentation, training, compliance analysis, or something else?\n\n3. **How much time do you have** to work through this together? (A few minutes for a rough sketch, or are we doing a detailed model?)\n\n4. **What's the scope**—just the happy path, or do we need to account for rejections, rework, parallel approvers, timeouts, and other complications?\n\nOnce I understand these, I can ask about your process itself in the right order and depth.", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling", "elicitation"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DUAC1PJCfw7bsh8MTKta5c", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 2283, + "inputTokens": 3494, + "outputTokens": 211, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 3705, + "cost": 0.004549 + }, + { + "durationMs": 4745, + "inputTokens": 12, + "outputTokens": 349, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4732, + "totalTokens": 5093, + "cost": 0.007672 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 7028, + "inputTokens": 3506, + "outputTokens": 560, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4732, + "totalTokens": 8798, + "cost": 0.012221 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nHelp me model our approval process as an SDCPN.\n\n## Assistant\nI'll help you model your approval process as an SDCPN. Let me first load the detailed guidance for SDCPN modelling.Good—I have the detailed guidance. Let me start by establishing the context and scope of your approval process, so I can elicit the right details and model it at the right level.\n\n**A few quick orientation questions:**\n\n1. **What kind of approvals** are we modeling—document reviews, purchase requests, hiring decisions, something else? \n\n2. **Who needs to see this model**, and what will they do with it—is this for process improvement, documentation, training, compliance analysis, or something else?\n\n3. **How much time do you have** to work through this together? (A few minutes for a rough sketch, or are we doing a detailed model?)\n\n4. **What's the scope**—just the happy path, or do we need to account for rejections, rework, parallel approvers, timeouts, and other complications?\n\nOnce I understand these, I can ask about your process itself in the right order and depth.\n- tool activate_skill (toolu_01DUAC1PJCfw7bsh8MTKta5c): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000026", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFFVDJaMjFaQVJHNjlTNVNXMFBOMFZT", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1ET2ZXHJ7WR9CRRDJF8AQAM", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET2Z33HE1DEFVE572S9CB7", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic, Data-Colored Petri Net) in Petrinaut. According to my instructions, I should:\n\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model\n2. Interview them to understand their approval process\n3. Build a model according to their requirements\n\nLet me start by activating the skill to get the full instructions for SDCPN modeling.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'll help you model your approval process as an SDCPN. Let me first load the detailed guidance for SDCPN modelling.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DUAC1PJCfw7bsh8MTKta5c", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 3 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good, the skill is loaded. Now I need to understand what I'm working with. The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN. I should:\n\n1. First, orient: understand their purpose, context, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy needs, and available time\n2. Then elicit: follow the concrete case through the process\n3. Maintain the workpiece as I go\n4. When ready, construct the SDCPN in Petrinaut\n\nLet me start with orientation questions to establish the scope and depth needed. I should use the user's operational vocabulary and not jump to formalism yet.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good—I have the detailed guidance. Let me start by establishing the context and scope of your approval process, so I can elicit the right details and model it at the right level.\n\n**A few quick orientation questions:**\n\n1. **What kind of approvals** are we modeling—document reviews, purchase requests, hiring decisions, something else? \n\n2. **Who needs to see this model**, and what will they do with it—is this for process improvement, documentation, training, compliance analysis, or something else?\n\n3. **How much time do you have** to work through this together? (A few minutes for a rough sketch, or are we doing a detailed model?)\n\n4. **What's the scope**—just the happy path, or do we need to account for rejections, rework, parallel approvers, timeouts, and other complications?\n\nOnce I understand these, I can ask about your process itself in the right order and depth.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1ET2Z22FQE0F6KTF39EV9E2" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:40:59.331Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:40:59.334Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:40:59.357Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:40:59.363Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET2Z33HE1DEFVE572S9CB7", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:40:59.363Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET2Z33HE1DEFVE572S9CB7", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:40:59.363Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277259399 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET2Z33HE1DEFVE572S9CB7", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:00.210Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET2Z33HE1DEFVE572S9CB7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:00.212Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "The user wants", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET2Z33HE1DEFVE572S9CB7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:01.022Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " to", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET2Z33HE1DEFVE572S9CB7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:01.022Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " model an", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET2Z33HE1DEFVE572S9CB7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:01.022Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " approval process as an SDCP", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET2Z33HE1DEFVE572S9CB7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:01.022Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "N (St", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET2Z33HE1DEFVE572S9CB7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:01.022Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "och", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET2Z33HE1DEFVE572S9CB7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:01.022Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "astic, Data-Colored Petri Net) in Petrinaut. According to my instructions, I should:\n\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-mod", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET2Z33HE1DEFVE572S9CB7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:01.022Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "elling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model\n2. Interview them to understand their approval process\n3. Build a model according to their requirements\n\nLet me start by activating the skill to get the full instructions for SDCPN modeling.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET2Z33HE1DEFVE572S9CB7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:01.022Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic, Data-Colored Petri Net) in Petrinaut. According to my instructions, I should:\n\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model\n2. Interview them to understand their approval process\n3. Build a model according to their requirements\n\nLet me start by activating the skill to get the full instructions for SDCPN modeling.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET2Z33HE1DEFVE572S9CB7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:01.023Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "I'll", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET2Z33HE1DEFVE572S9CB7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:01.357Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " help you model your approval process as an SDCPN. Let me first load the detailed guidance for SDCPN modelling.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET2Z33HE1DEFVE572S9CB7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:01.357Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DUAC1PJCfw7bsh8MTKta5c", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET2Z33HE1DEFVE572S9CB7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:01.358Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DUAC1PJCfw7bsh8MTKta5c", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\": \"sdcpn-modelling", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET2Z33HE1DEFVE572S9CB7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:01.607Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DUAC1PJCfw7bsh8MTKta5c", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET2Z33HE1DEFVE572S9CB7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:01.607Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET2Z33HE1DEFVE572S9CB7", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 2283, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011CecyNYduGuHqsBUGcoYB9", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic, Data-Colored Petri Net) in Petrinaut. According to my instructions, I should:\n\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model\n2. Interview them to understand their approval process\n3. Build a model according to their requirements\n\nLet me start by activating the skill to get the full instructions for SDCPN modeling.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'll help you model your approval process as an SDCPN. Let me first load the detailed guidance for SDCPN modelling." + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01DUAC1PJCfw7bsh8MTKta5c", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3494, + "output": 211, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3705, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0034939999999999997, + "output": 0.0010550000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.004549 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:01.646Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic, Data-Colored Petri Net) in Petrinaut. According to my instructions, I should:\n\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model\n2. Interview them to understand their approval process\n3. Build a model according to their requirements\n\nLet me start by activating the skill to get the full instructions for SDCPN modeling.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'll help you model your approval process as an SDCPN. Let me first load the detailed guidance for SDCPN modelling." + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01DUAC1PJCfw7bsh8MTKta5c", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3494, + "output": 211, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3705, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0034939999999999997, + "output": 0.0010550000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.004549 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 116 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277259399, + "responseId": "msg_011CecyNYduGuHqsBUGcoYB9", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET2Z33HE1DEFVE572S9CB7", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:01.646Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DUAC1PJCfw7bsh8MTKta5c", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET2Z33HE1DEFVE572S9CB7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:01.647Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DUAC1PJCfw7bsh8MTKta5c", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277261650 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET2Z33HE1DEFVE572S9CB7", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:01.650Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DUAC1PJCfw7bsh8MTKta5c", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277261650 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET2Z33HE1DEFVE572S9CB7", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:01.650Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DUAC1PJCfw7bsh8MTKta5c", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 3, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET2Z33HE1DEFVE572S9CB7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:01.651Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET2Z33HE1DEFVE572S9CB7", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic, Data-Colored Petri Net) in Petrinaut. According to my instructions, I should:\n\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model\n2. Interview them to understand their approval process\n3. Build a model according to their requirements\n\nLet me start by activating the skill to get the full instructions for SDCPN modeling.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'll help you model your approval process as an SDCPN. Let me first load the detailed guidance for SDCPN modelling." + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01DUAC1PJCfw7bsh8MTKta5c", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3494, + "output": 211, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3705, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0034939999999999997, + "output": 0.0010550000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.004549 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 116 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277259399, + "responseId": "msg_011CecyNYduGuHqsBUGcoYB9", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DUAC1PJCfw7bsh8MTKta5c", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277261650 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:01.651Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET31AMNWKCKTT8PD27GD77", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:01.652Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET31AMNWKCKTT8PD27GD77", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic, Data-Colored Petri Net) in Petrinaut. According to my instructions, I should:\n\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model\n2. Interview them to understand their approval process\n3. Build a model according to their requirements\n\nLet me start by activating the skill to get the full instructions for SDCPN modeling.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'll help you model your approval process as an SDCPN. Let me first load the detailed guidance for SDCPN modelling." + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01DUAC1PJCfw7bsh8MTKta5c", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DUAC1PJCfw7bsh8MTKta5c", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:01.652Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277261653 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET31AMNWKCKTT8PD27GD77", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:02.309Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET31AMNWKCKTT8PD27GD77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:02.310Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "Good", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET31AMNWKCKTT8PD27GD77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:03.311Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ",", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET31AMNWKCKTT8PD27GD77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:03.311Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " the skill", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET31AMNWKCKTT8PD27GD77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:03.311Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " is loaded. Now I need to understand what I'm working with. The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN. I", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET31AMNWKCKTT8PD27GD77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:03.311Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " should:\n\n1. First, orient: understand their purpose, context, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy needs, and available time\n2. Then el", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET31AMNWKCKTT8PD27GD77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:03.311Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "icit: follow the concrete case through the process\n3. Maintain the workpiece as I go\n4. When ready, construct the SDCPN in Petrinaut\n\nLet me start with orientation questions", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET31AMNWKCKTT8PD27GD77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:04.005Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " to establish the scope and depth needed. I should use the user's operational vocabulary and not jump", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET31AMNWKCKTT8PD27GD77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:04.005Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " to formalism yet.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET31AMNWKCKTT8PD27GD77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:04.005Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "Good, the skill is loaded. Now I need to understand what I'm working with. The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN. I should:\n\n1. First, orient: understand their purpose, context, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy needs, and available time\n2. Then elicit: follow the concrete case through the process\n3. Maintain the workpiece as I go\n4. When ready, construct the SDCPN in Petrinaut\n\nLet me start with orientation questions to establish the scope and depth needed. I should use the user's operational vocabulary and not jump to formalism yet.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET31AMNWKCKTT8PD27GD77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:04.005Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "Good—I have the detailed guidance. Let me start by establishing the context", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET31AMNWKCKTT8PD27GD77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:05.008Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " and scope of your approval process, so I can elicit the right details and model it at the right level.\n\n**", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET31AMNWKCKTT8PD27GD77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:05.008Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "A few quick orientation questions:**\n\n1. **What kind of approvals** are we modeling—document reviews, purchase", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET31AMNWKCKTT8PD27GD77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:05.008Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " requests, hiring decisions, something else? \n\n2. **Who needs to see this model**, and what will they do with it—is this", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET31AMNWKCKTT8PD27GD77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:05.008Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " for process improvement, documentation, training, compliance analysis, or something else?\n\n3. **How much time do you have** to work through this together? (", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET31AMNWKCKTT8PD27GD77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:06.267Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "A few minutes for a rough sketch, or are we doing a detailed model", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET31AMNWKCKTT8PD27GD77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:06.267Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "?)\n\n4. **What's the scope**—just the happy path, or do we need to account for rejections, rework, parallel", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET31AMNWKCKTT8PD27GD77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:06.267Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " approvers, timeouts, and other complications?\n\nOnce I understand these, I can ask about your process itself", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET31AMNWKCKTT8PD27GD77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:06.267Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " in the right order and depth.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET31AMNWKCKTT8PD27GD77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:06.388Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET31AMNWKCKTT8PD27GD77", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4745, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011CecyNhjLvSVYknPv3aPuM", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is loaded. Now I need to understand what I'm working with. The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN. I should:\n\n1. First, orient: understand their purpose, context, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy needs, and available time\n2. Then elicit: follow the concrete case through the process\n3. Maintain the workpiece as I go\n4. When ready, construct the SDCPN in Petrinaut\n\nLet me start with orientation questions to establish the scope and depth needed. I should use the user's operational vocabulary and not jump to formalism yet.", + "thinkingSignature": "ErAGCpoBCBEYAipAYlew48xWzKl3anNR1CjDpQVLUknoKppeGO9QFDJ2VkbltqCvN07Le4A60XtS/DpVoMhOPuu28aIrI2CbwbbVuDIZY2xhdWRlLWhhaWt1LTQtNS0yMDI1MTAwMTgAQgh0aGlua2luZ1okMWNiODRmYzQtNDdhYS00ZTFmLWE2NjUtOTQwYWI5ZjgxZjg4qAGP5NvUBhIMcZbClV8p0JaEvMesGgxmbrVrVFwIzyZvyhIiMMrKhr4+EbMdCrmRJMPMooh39QMGAJw6rVmHcpf8to4TJmdAVKQQiDt+ntU0blK6JyrCBJGuqJEIlWCZ7xfLOi9V29DxxQOtYIPASvJyE+/7uGC/C79rHK0sPtSCz3TXndxXdEIIx6Jt4RcMz2pgnGrFIuwiH8JksGbkcluJkW8Q08gPv/SichjJ7jNwsrLufsFR8l8lwvmV58Xap07YAJIpd28KpIVdh9coNJ6I8m74htSHbbf5d0LS57ONWDWmE4JUfrtepKE7mML80XazJs5z9pRYBpM7ZuXOP9lETjxUBUqBXb1Xy9YChVMVYJAR8xjphp7rul/yYvlzvRZCHTbyYMdetmbsLsbZ6KFcU3+8JwbylbhchEnH3KfUUMMHq0lISKO1qFixPNeU4c5HnVXXNo+FC9L39Gt/JTAFt1MA1R+YC1y1pro2tMU+xK5E+tyKx1Gg+zrCklXEdToRIbxckN7oETRWBuif5Yj5DBOUdIfmfwGGDpwjfDGOZp1/yyPKhBpGu2skiN+IoNIZGMMz0wElHM7fHMwj9ZHkJKHvaJR9dESrvCe58kUkAN+1oM5kg+24PfjzgSNSY9CuoMhidPsmU1uYT/OQFz4xRXRnnZnJLIOCGv+xf1dqo22rHZ0cX5N+JOC5wcvwPo3+CTfxJkxXeO92GT863mtw3OmD0QYeg4CZ/wL7TKOMInvW31VPn+MqvuXUp8CKdRYHBoxmxX66xNKrFnMzLla2E/S8epqB9IVuF8I9+jTDFVrDOyqM4s4TystOw5VVpdIs+qzSBgbraBywH6H5GxBOuzxg2rp/1DeTiErMN0J1fmXr+fWjT/4bGAE=" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good—I have the detailed guidance. Let me start by establishing the context and scope of your approval process, so I can elicit the right details and model it at the right level.\n\n**A few quick orientation questions:**\n\n1. **What kind of approvals** are we modeling—document reviews, purchase requests, hiring decisions, something else? \n\n2. **Who needs to see this model**, and what will they do with it—is this for process improvement, documentation, training, compliance analysis, or something else?\n\n3. **How much time do you have** to work through this together? (A few minutes for a rough sketch, or are we doing a detailed model?)\n\n4. **What's the scope**—just the happy path, or do we need to account for rejections, rework, parallel approvers, timeouts, and other complications?\n\nOnce I understand these, I can ask about your process itself in the right order and depth." + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 349, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4732, + "totalTokens": 5093, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.0017450000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.005915, + "total": 0.007672 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:06.397Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is loaded. Now I need to understand what I'm working with. The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN. I should:\n\n1. First, orient: understand their purpose, context, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy needs, and available time\n2. Then elicit: follow the concrete case through the process\n3. Maintain the workpiece as I go\n4. When ready, construct the SDCPN in Petrinaut\n\nLet me start with orientation questions to establish the scope and depth needed. I should use the user's operational vocabulary and not jump to formalism yet.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good—I have the detailed guidance. Let me start by establishing the context and scope of your approval process, so I can elicit the right details and model it at the right level.\n\n**A few quick orientation questions:**\n\n1. **What kind of approvals** are we modeling—document reviews, purchase requests, hiring decisions, something else? \n\n2. **Who needs to see this model**, and what will they do with it—is this for process improvement, documentation, training, compliance analysis, or something else?\n\n3. **How much time do you have** to work through this together? (A few minutes for a rough sketch, or are we doing a detailed model?)\n\n4. **What's the scope**—just the happy path, or do we need to account for rejections, rework, parallel approvers, timeouts, and other complications?\n\nOnce I understand these, I can ask about your process itself in the right order and depth." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 349, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4732, + "totalTokens": 5093, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.0017450000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.005915, + "total": 0.007672 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 141 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277261653, + "responseId": "msg_011CecyNhjLvSVYknPv3aPuM", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET31AMNWKCKTT8PD27GD77", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:06.397Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET31AMNWKCKTT8PD27GD77", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is loaded. Now I need to understand what I'm working with. The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN. I should:\n\n1. First, orient: understand their purpose, context, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy needs, and available time\n2. Then elicit: follow the concrete case through the process\n3. Maintain the workpiece as I go\n4. When ready, construct the SDCPN in Petrinaut\n\nLet me start with orientation questions to establish the scope and depth needed. I should use the user's operational vocabulary and not jump to formalism yet.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good—I have the detailed guidance. Let me start by establishing the context and scope of your approval process, so I can elicit the right details and model it at the right level.\n\n**A few quick orientation questions:**\n\n1. **What kind of approvals** are we modeling—document reviews, purchase requests, hiring decisions, something else? \n\n2. **Who needs to see this model**, and what will they do with it—is this for process improvement, documentation, training, compliance analysis, or something else?\n\n3. **How much time do you have** to work through this together? (A few minutes for a rough sketch, or are we doing a detailed model?)\n\n4. **What's the scope**—just the happy path, or do we need to account for rejections, rework, parallel approvers, timeouts, and other complications?\n\nOnce I understand these, I can ask about your process itself in the right order and depth." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 349, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4732, + "totalTokens": 5093, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.0017450000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.005915, + "total": 0.007672 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 141 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277261653, + "responseId": "msg_011CecyNhjLvSVYknPv3aPuM", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:06.397Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic, Data-Colored Petri Net) in Petrinaut. According to my instructions, I should:\n\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model\n2. Interview them to understand their approval process\n3. Build a model according to their requirements\n\nLet me start by activating the skill to get the full instructions for SDCPN modeling.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'll help you model your approval process as an SDCPN. Let me first load the detailed guidance for SDCPN modelling." + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01DUAC1PJCfw7bsh8MTKta5c", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3494, + "output": 211, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3705, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0034939999999999997, + "output": 0.0010550000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.004549 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 116 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277259399, + "responseId": "msg_011CecyNYduGuHqsBUGcoYB9", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DUAC1PJCfw7bsh8MTKta5c", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A2d0cdf44c84d68c9/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277261650 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is loaded. Now I need to understand what I'm working with. The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN. I should:\n\n1. First, orient: understand their purpose, context, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy needs, and available time\n2. Then elicit: follow the concrete case through the process\n3. Maintain the workpiece as I go\n4. When ready, construct the SDCPN in Petrinaut\n\nLet me start with orientation questions to establish the scope and depth needed. I should use the user's operational vocabulary and not jump to formalism yet.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good—I have the detailed guidance. Let me start by establishing the context and scope of your approval process, so I can elicit the right details and model it at the right level.\n\n**A few quick orientation questions:**\n\n1. **What kind of approvals** are we modeling—document reviews, purchase requests, hiring decisions, something else? \n\n2. **Who needs to see this model**, and what will they do with it—is this for process improvement, documentation, training, compliance analysis, or something else?\n\n3. **How much time do you have** to work through this together? (A few minutes for a rough sketch, or are we doing a detailed model?)\n\n4. **What's the scope**—just the happy path, or do we need to account for rejections, rework, parallel approvers, timeouts, and other complications?\n\nOnce I understand these, I can ask about your process itself in the right order and depth." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 349, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4732, + "totalTokens": 5093, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.0017450000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.005915, + "total": 0.007672 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 141 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277261653, + "responseId": "msg_011CecyNhjLvSVYknPv3aPuM", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:06.398Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 7041, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:06.398Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET2Z242NZKW6GMQJ0PXVH4", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET2Z2XT5TT8XSC32Y4E7NG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:06.399Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET2Z21ZARG69S5SW0PN0VS", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "217c3d7647bff09690dad80ca2c301d5669afc54cafea443cabbb72c33ec1737", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:06.399Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "82356eb4e0aab1634c21d96a36e834394fe9987e7445a26b84c6fd1c497763ab", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "df514bda6fbedcbcf09b8bd8b148716cb8a3297293a8cd4e18ec47e566c46b62", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "a67aa0c87bdc8e72c0bcbbe4cad603ed264809957b56b9c0ccef4032ae08cf0e", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "21bf274423e833c1e4a4af5f747978a4c3c3db2815da973a4894c8e72dba88de", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/scenarios.json": "10e5b6897319045485a33e556d1de05241cbdbe9ddf5e8fa6c72ef73199252c1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/protocol.md": "476984da4bd65f21717dff1c450a82e86017ef0652b03b778c0691e585aabf0a", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md": "c16d5faaa7a450a41d6888dd6d2b3eac88e4687779b0c8f8e6fe4eceeeb241c6", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "b4959142f10c74e9b04a5d0c0dfb3b74dbab8c492a26e34d2c2c8ff9e3eb7cfa" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "a4b0261917a6627172e83b87f31142fb905758a8a7f7a7f000781c1fba880f34", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "63adaa3aa89e11862add6537e33c87fdb548bd058c7dac54fa67a5a28cc20b3c", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/paid/packaged-S1.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/paid/packaged-S1.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cd8e7682668 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/runs/paid/packaged-S1.json @@ -0,0 +1,1764 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-packaged-s1-6c45ed17", + "phase": "paid", + "candidate": "packaged", + "scenarioId": "S1", + "scenario": { + "title": "Underspecified interactive request", + "prompt": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "stopAfter": "The first consequential question.", + "expected": "Ask one high-yield question in operational vocabulary after loading universal and SDCPN elicitation judgment." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "Good—I have the skill guidance loaded. Before we start interviewing, I need to **orient** by understanding your context and objectives. Let me ask a few clarifying questions:\n\n1. **What is the scope of this approval process?** (e.g., document approval, budget approval, hiring decisions, IT change requests, something else?)\n\n2. **Who are the main stakeholders or decision-makers** involved?\n\n3. **What are you trying to do with this model?** For example:\n - Understand the current flow?\n - Identify bottlenecks or failure points?\n - Design a new or improved process?\n - Simulate different scenarios (e.g., what if approvers are unavailable)?\n - Optimize cycle time or resource allocation?\n\n4. **How much time do you have right now** to work through this?\n\n5. **What's your comfort level with Petri net concepts?** Have you worked with them before, or is this new?\n\nThese answers will help me pitch the interview at the right level and prioritize what we focus on.", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "toolu_01GJgU86je8VdfE82zZjsgCn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 1825, + "inputTokens": 3442, + "outputTokens": 173, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 3615, + "cost": 0.004307 + }, + { + "durationMs": 4068, + "inputTokens": 12, + "outputTokens": 355, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4694, + "totalTokens": 5061, + "cost": 0.007654500000000001 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 5893, + "inputTokens": 3454, + "outputTokens": 528, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4694, + "totalTokens": 8676, + "cost": 0.0119615 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nHelp me model our approval process as an SDCPN.\n\n## Assistant\nGood—I have the skill guidance loaded. Before we start interviewing, I need to **orient** by understanding your context and objectives. Let me ask a few clarifying questions:\n\n1. **What is the scope of this approval process?** (e.g., document approval, budget approval, hiring decisions, IT change requests, something else?)\n\n2. **Who are the main stakeholders or decision-makers** involved?\n\n3. **What are you trying to do with this model?** For example:\n - Understand the current flow?\n - Identify bottlenecks or failure points?\n - Design a new or improved process?\n - Simulate different scenarios (e.g., what if approvers are unavailable)?\n - Optimize cycle time or resource allocation?\n\n4. **How much time do you have right now** to work through this?\n\n5. **What's your comfort level with Petri net concepts?** Have you worked with them before, or is this new?\n\nThese answers will help me pitch the interview at the right level and prioritize what we focus on.\n- tool activate_skill (toolu_01GJgU86je8VdfE82zZjsgCn): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000022", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFFVDNBUDRZM0FOQVQ1R1Y3VzQyMjAx", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1ET3BBA3MEM36AXBSBB4X8H", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3AQ212WX64MA4RHW1J3P", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The user wants to model their approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic and Dynamic Colored Petri Net). According to my instructions, I should:\n\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model\n2. Follow the core elicitation procedure: kickoff, trajectories, and closings\n\nLet me start by activating the skill to get the full specialized instructions for SDCPN modelling.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01GJgU86je8VdfE82zZjsgCn", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 3 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good, the skill has been activated. Now I need to follow the lifecycle: orient, elicit, maintain workpiece, construct, check, and deliver.\n\nFirst, I should orient — establish the purpose, context, audience, boundary, horizon, and accuracy needs. Let me read the elicitation guides to understand what questions to ask.\n\nLet me start by reading the sdcpn-elicitation.md and workpiece-template.md to understand how to structure the interview and the workpiece.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good—I have the skill guidance loaded. Before we start interviewing, I need to **orient** by understanding your context and objectives. Let me ask a few clarifying questions:\n\n1. **What is the scope of this approval process?** (e.g., document approval, budget approval, hiring decisions, IT change requests, something else?)\n\n2. **Who are the main stakeholders or decision-makers** involved?\n\n3. **What are you trying to do with this model?** For example:\n - Understand the current flow?\n - Identify bottlenecks or failure points?\n - Design a new or improved process?\n - Simulate different scenarios (e.g., what if approvers are unavailable)?\n - Optimize cycle time or resource allocation?\n\n4. **How much time do you have right now** to work through this?\n\n5. **What's your comfort level with Petri net concepts?** Have you worked with them before, or is this new?\n\nThese answers will help me pitch the interview at the right level and prioritize what we focus on.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1ET3AP5ND6AT59XSMTY7GA8" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:11.238Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:11.241Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:11.261Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:11.266Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3AQ212WX64MA4RHW1J3P", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:11.266Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3AQ212WX64MA4RHW1J3P", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:11.266Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277271277 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3AQ212WX64MA4RHW1J3P", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:11.915Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3AQ212WX64MA4RHW1J3P", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:11.918Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "The user wants to", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3AQ212WX64MA4RHW1J3P", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:12.920Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " model their approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic and Dynamic Colored Petri Net). According to my instructions, I should:\n\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or construct", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3AQ212WX64MA4RHW1J3P", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:12.920Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "ing a process model\n2. Follow the core elicitation procedure: kickoff, trajectories, and closings\n\nLet me start by activating the skill to get the full specialized", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3AQ212WX64MA4RHW1J3P", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:12.920Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " instructions for SDCPN modelling.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3AQ212WX64MA4RHW1J3P", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:12.920Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "The user wants to model their approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic and Dynamic Colored Petri Net). According to my instructions, I should:\n\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model\n2. Follow the core elicitation procedure: kickoff, trajectories, and closings\n\nLet me start by activating the skill to get the full specialized instructions for SDCPN modelling.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3AQ212WX64MA4RHW1J3P", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:12.924Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01GJgU86je8VdfE82zZjsgCn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3AQ212WX64MA4RHW1J3P", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:12.988Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01GJgU86je8VdfE82zZjsgCn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\": \"sdcpn-modelling", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3AQ212WX64MA4RHW1J3P", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:13.018Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01GJgU86je8VdfE82zZjsgCn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3AQ212WX64MA4RHW1J3P", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:13.054Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3AQ212WX64MA4RHW1J3P", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 1825, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011CecyPQvb5Z1NdWYTQG3aP", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model their approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic and Dynamic Colored Petri Net). According to my instructions, I should:\n\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model\n2. Follow the core elicitation procedure: kickoff, trajectories, and closings\n\nLet me start by activating the skill to get the full specialized instructions for SDCPN modelling.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01GJgU86je8VdfE82zZjsgCn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3442, + "output": 173, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3615, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0034419999999999997, + "output": 0.0008650000000000001, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.004307 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:13.091Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model their approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic and Dynamic Colored Petri Net). According to my instructions, I should:\n\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model\n2. Follow the core elicitation procedure: kickoff, trajectories, and closings\n\nLet me start by activating the skill to get the full specialized instructions for SDCPN modelling.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01GJgU86je8VdfE82zZjsgCn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3442, + "output": 173, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3615, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0034419999999999997, + "output": 0.0008650000000000001, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.004307 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 111 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277271277, + "responseId": "msg_011CecyPQvb5Z1NdWYTQG3aP", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3AQ212WX64MA4RHW1J3P", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:13.091Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01GJgU86je8VdfE82zZjsgCn", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3AQ212WX64MA4RHW1J3P", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:13.093Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01GJgU86je8VdfE82zZjsgCn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277273096 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3AQ212WX64MA4RHW1J3P", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:13.096Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01GJgU86je8VdfE82zZjsgCn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277273096 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3AQ212WX64MA4RHW1J3P", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:13.096Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01GJgU86je8VdfE82zZjsgCn", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 3, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3AQ212WX64MA4RHW1J3P", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:13.097Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3AQ212WX64MA4RHW1J3P", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model their approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic and Dynamic Colored Petri Net). According to my instructions, I should:\n\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model\n2. Follow the core elicitation procedure: kickoff, trajectories, and closings\n\nLet me start by activating the skill to get the full specialized instructions for SDCPN modelling.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01GJgU86je8VdfE82zZjsgCn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3442, + "output": 173, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3615, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0034419999999999997, + "output": 0.0008650000000000001, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.004307 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 111 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277271277, + "responseId": "msg_011CecyPQvb5Z1NdWYTQG3aP", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01GJgU86je8VdfE82zZjsgCn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277273096 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:13.097Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3CGABCY9ER882A2RJ93C", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:13.098Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3CGABCY9ER882A2RJ93C", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model their approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic and Dynamic Colored Petri Net). According to my instructions, I should:\n\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model\n2. Follow the core elicitation procedure: kickoff, trajectories, and closings\n\nLet me start by activating the skill to get the full specialized instructions for SDCPN modelling.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01GJgU86je8VdfE82zZjsgCn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01GJgU86je8VdfE82zZjsgCn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:13.098Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277273099 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3CGABCY9ER882A2RJ93C", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:13.746Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3CGABCY9ER882A2RJ93C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:13.747Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "Good", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3CGABCY9ER882A2RJ93C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:14.749Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ", the skill", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3CGABCY9ER882A2RJ93C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:14.749Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " has", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3CGABCY9ER882A2RJ93C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:14.749Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " been activated", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3CGABCY9ER882A2RJ93C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:14.749Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ".", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3CGABCY9ER882A2RJ93C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:14.749Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " Now I need to follow the lifecycle: orient, elicit, maintain workpiece, construct, check, and deliver.\n\nFirst, I should orient", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3CGABCY9ER882A2RJ93C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:14.749Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " — establish the purpose, context, audience, boundary, horizon, and accuracy needs. Let me read the elicitation guides to understand what questions to ask.\n\nLet", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3CGABCY9ER882A2RJ93C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:14.749Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " me start by reading the sdcpn-elicitation.md and workpiece-template.md to understand how to structure the interview and the workpiece.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3CGABCY9ER882A2RJ93C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:15.086Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3CGABCY9ER882A2RJ93C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:15.086Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "Good, the skill has been activated. Now I need to follow the lifecycle: orient, elicit, maintain workpiece, construct, check, and deliver.\n\nFirst, I should orient — establish the purpose, context, audience, boundary, horizon, and accuracy needs. Let me read the elicitation guides to understand what questions to ask.\n\nLet me start by reading the sdcpn-elicitation.md and workpiece-template.md to understand how to structure the interview and the workpiece.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3CGABCY9ER882A2RJ93C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:15.086Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "Good—I have the skill guidance loaded. Before we start interviewing, I need to **orient** by understanding", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3CGABCY9ER882A2RJ93C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:16.091Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " your context and objectives. Let me ask a few clarifying questions:\n\n1. **What is the scope of this approval process?** (e.g., document", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3CGABCY9ER882A2RJ93C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:16.091Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " approval, budget approval, hiring decisions, IT change requests, something else?)\n\n2. **Who are the main stakeholders or decision-makers**", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3CGABCY9ER882A2RJ93C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:16.091Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " involved?\n\n3. **What are you trying to do with this model?** For example:\n - Understand the current flow?\n - Identify bottlenecks or failure", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3CGABCY9ER882A2RJ93C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:16.091Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " points?\n - Design a new or improved process?\n - Simulate different scenarios (e.g., what if approvers are unavailable)?\n - Optimize cycle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3CGABCY9ER882A2RJ93C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:17.161Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " time or resource allocation?\n\n4. **How much time do you have right now** to work through this?\n\n5. **What's your comfort level with Pet", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3CGABCY9ER882A2RJ93C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:17.161Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ri net concepts?** Have you worked with them before, or is this new?\n\nThese answers will help me pitch the interview", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3CGABCY9ER882A2RJ93C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:17.161Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " at the right level and prioritize what we focus on.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3CGABCY9ER882A2RJ93C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:17.161Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3CGABCY9ER882A2RJ93C", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4068, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011CecyPYeRssCu3X5K9cE95", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill has been activated. Now I need to follow the lifecycle: orient, elicit, maintain workpiece, construct, check, and deliver.\n\nFirst, I should orient — establish the purpose, context, audience, boundary, horizon, and accuracy needs. Let me read the elicitation guides to understand what questions to ask.\n\nLet me start by reading the sdcpn-elicitation.md and workpiece-template.md to understand how to structure the interview and the workpiece.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good—I have the skill guidance loaded. Before we start interviewing, I need to **orient** by understanding your context and objectives. Let me ask a few clarifying questions:\n\n1. **What is the scope of this approval process?** (e.g., document approval, budget approval, hiring decisions, IT change requests, something else?)\n\n2. **Who are the main stakeholders or decision-makers** involved?\n\n3. **What are you trying to do with this model?** For example:\n - Understand the current flow?\n - Identify bottlenecks or failure points?\n - Design a new or improved process?\n - Simulate different scenarios (e.g., what if approvers are unavailable)?\n - Optimize cycle time or resource allocation?\n\n4. **How much time do you have right now** to work through this?\n\n5. **What's your comfort level with Petri net concepts?** Have you worked with them before, or is this new?\n\nThese answers will help me pitch the interview at the right level and prioritize what we focus on." + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 355, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4694, + "totalTokens": 5061, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.001775, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.0058675, + "total": 0.007654500000000001 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:17.166Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill has been activated. Now I need to follow the lifecycle: orient, elicit, maintain workpiece, construct, check, and deliver.\n\nFirst, I should orient — establish the purpose, context, audience, boundary, horizon, and accuracy needs. Let me read the elicitation guides to understand what questions to ask.\n\nLet me start by reading the sdcpn-elicitation.md and workpiece-template.md to understand how to structure the interview and the workpiece.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good—I have the skill guidance loaded. Before we start interviewing, I need to **orient** by understanding your context and objectives. Let me ask a few clarifying questions:\n\n1. **What is the scope of this approval process?** (e.g., document approval, budget approval, hiring decisions, IT change requests, something else?)\n\n2. **Who are the main stakeholders or decision-makers** involved?\n\n3. **What are you trying to do with this model?** For example:\n - Understand the current flow?\n - Identify bottlenecks or failure points?\n - Design a new or improved process?\n - Simulate different scenarios (e.g., what if approvers are unavailable)?\n - Optimize cycle time or resource allocation?\n\n4. **How much time do you have right now** to work through this?\n\n5. **What's your comfort level with Petri net concepts?** Have you worked with them before, or is this new?\n\nThese answers will help me pitch the interview at the right level and prioritize what we focus on." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 355, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4694, + "totalTokens": 5061, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.001775, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.0058675, + "total": 0.007654500000000001 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 111 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277273099, + "responseId": "msg_011CecyPYeRssCu3X5K9cE95", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3CGABCY9ER882A2RJ93C", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:17.166Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ET3CGABCY9ER882A2RJ93C", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill has been activated. Now I need to follow the lifecycle: orient, elicit, maintain workpiece, construct, check, and deliver.\n\nFirst, I should orient — establish the purpose, context, audience, boundary, horizon, and accuracy needs. Let me read the elicitation guides to understand what questions to ask.\n\nLet me start by reading the sdcpn-elicitation.md and workpiece-template.md to understand how to structure the interview and the workpiece.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good—I have the skill guidance loaded. Before we start interviewing, I need to **orient** by understanding your context and objectives. Let me ask a few clarifying questions:\n\n1. **What is the scope of this approval process?** (e.g., document approval, budget approval, hiring decisions, IT change requests, something else?)\n\n2. **Who are the main stakeholders or decision-makers** involved?\n\n3. **What are you trying to do with this model?** For example:\n - Understand the current flow?\n - Identify bottlenecks or failure points?\n - Design a new or improved process?\n - Simulate different scenarios (e.g., what if approvers are unavailable)?\n - Optimize cycle time or resource allocation?\n\n4. **How much time do you have right now** to work through this?\n\n5. **What's your comfort level with Petri net concepts?** Have you worked with them before, or is this new?\n\nThese answers will help me pitch the interview at the right level and prioritize what we focus on." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 355, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4694, + "totalTokens": 5061, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.001775, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.0058675, + "total": 0.007654500000000001 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 111 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277273099, + "responseId": "msg_011CecyPYeRssCu3X5K9cE95", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:17.166Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model their approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic and Dynamic Colored Petri Net). According to my instructions, I should:\n\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model\n2. Follow the core elicitation procedure: kickoff, trajectories, and closings\n\nLet me start by activating the skill to get the full specialized instructions for SDCPN modelling.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01GJgU86je8VdfE82zZjsgCn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3442, + "output": 173, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3615, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0034419999999999997, + "output": 0.0008650000000000001, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.004307 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 111 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277271277, + "responseId": "msg_011CecyPQvb5Z1NdWYTQG3aP", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01GJgU86je8VdfE82zZjsgCn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A47e2d994e6934a99/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277273096 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill has been activated. Now I need to follow the lifecycle: orient, elicit, maintain workpiece, construct, check, and deliver.\n\nFirst, I should orient — establish the purpose, context, audience, boundary, horizon, and accuracy needs. Let me read the elicitation guides to understand what questions to ask.\n\nLet me start by reading the sdcpn-elicitation.md and workpiece-template.md to understand how to structure the interview and the workpiece.", + "thinkingSignature": "EskFCpoBCBEYAipA8yg/oudKVBdY8ZFF/TTjgwpRT3JL9FjE0UmAKlXCbiuWYe/DKkXCLNKkKwTElC0E/LYfL1r/LkQJyGm3Dm/n6zIZY2xhdWRlLWhhaWt1LTQtNS0yMDI1MTAwMTgAQgh0aGlua2luZ1okMWNiODRmYzQtNDdhYS00ZTFmLWE2NjUtOTQwYWI5ZjgxZjg4qAGb5NvUBhIMoO2Xx85PKmsHXotFGgwELLl5c/fqf9trluIiMO9HJ+/zdil2Op7r8r6a38FB8aY4aPVW5Qch7GAt9NzGF9LlUQT2I0yoW9XczZuXWyrbA0PG/CVKfrHR01G6mxmYnDLg/xhPJEGkAme6hX8UVAFOiVa+b5aKURpR+u2rQOectN5r88TMOVDfopnAa6fTtNtHBhTqrEtRb6Ua127xKmMIE/xgcTa+ZVnuIvQTzvaC0QWg3U+IkTdZI51T8SuT3A6MH43+U9CsZxTyH/Kl7cl/79horuYEiCl3xPMlvYgZxwdQ9u7g/KHfYy5d+AItIFuuhX4OVZmp6VW/If+gXogolYsVJ6oTJfXmanYER+L3B+rLOEtekI5kbGvsfDxQbw5JRwZzpvFZXbj9gtXsq6tcB59eiXIvPujXHs+rUaG/DljoHDcV0d9+CHzPHAs+kQg3kRpUnSVCFWHf2/owLMsoGJUoicP/ClIhP7QrPLdsn3tYP5A5vekhYUx3j8cZofMnpQQRaIkazuRAFFXR+MZapLUlXP59+G+oV5agkuOdcygiWJWIkXGFHLgq/sbLmqpHZUKGJ9lvUJHIrhkbk4VDzw8G1WGTgqG+NVnPvnj5B333VgTAwt+GJ0Wo6UQXPBQZwyBUOiKy8wykGksubbTyVYtipoVTg/KxF6Uzr/fgrJasdLqGB2WubLaH2cl2x7YEiXwGXdh9xEOs8VpbofP0hQjzfUowBqDIEEMYAQ==" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good—I have the skill guidance loaded. Before we start interviewing, I need to **orient** by understanding your context and objectives. Let me ask a few clarifying questions:\n\n1. **What is the scope of this approval process?** (e.g., document approval, budget approval, hiring decisions, IT change requests, something else?)\n\n2. **Who are the main stakeholders or decision-makers** involved?\n\n3. **What are you trying to do with this model?** For example:\n - Understand the current flow?\n - Identify bottlenecks or failure points?\n - Design a new or improved process?\n - Simulate different scenarios (e.g., what if approvers are unavailable)?\n - Optimize cycle time or resource allocation?\n\n4. **How much time do you have right now** to work through this?\n\n5. **What's your comfort level with Petri net concepts?** Have you worked with them before, or is this new?\n\nThese answers will help me pitch the interview at the right level and prioritize what we focus on." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 355, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4694, + "totalTokens": 5061, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.001775, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.0058675, + "total": 0.007654500000000001 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 111 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277273099, + "responseId": "msg_011CecyPYeRssCu3X5K9cE95", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:17.167Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 5906, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:17.167Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ET3AP6K494G32GGP0X0PHQ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ET3APXYZ4F4T78P7V0BPGC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:17.167Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ET3AP4Y3ANAT5GV7W42201", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "21aa9c906ee47974e4957902e4beeb9458dc235856919999f79d5ac1d69d045c", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:41:17.168Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "82356eb4e0aab1634c21d96a36e834394fe9987e7445a26b84c6fd1c497763ab", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "df514bda6fbedcbcf09b8bd8b148716cb8a3297293a8cd4e18ec47e566c46b62", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "a67aa0c87bdc8e72c0bcbbe4cad603ed264809957b56b9c0ccef4032ae08cf0e", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "21bf274423e833c1e4a4af5f747978a4c3c3db2815da973a4894c8e72dba88de", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/scenarios.json": "10e5b6897319045485a33e556d1de05241cbdbe9ddf5e8fa6c72ef73199252c1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/protocol.md": "476984da4bd65f21717dff1c450a82e86017ef0652b03b778c0691e585aabf0a", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md": "c16d5faaa7a450a41d6888dd6d2b3eac88e4687779b0c8f8e6fe4eceeeb241c6", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "b4959142f10c74e9b04a5d0c0dfb3b74dbab8c492a26e34d2c2c8ff9e3eb7cfa" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "a4b0261917a6627172e83b87f31142fb905758a8a7f7a7f000781c1fba880f34", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "63adaa3aa89e11862add6537e33c87fdb548bd058c7dac54fa67a5a28cc20b3c", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/comparison.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/comparison.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f482f0134df --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/comparison.md @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ +# Flue skill-composition side-quest v2 comparison + +## Outcome + +**Invalid or inconclusive, with one S1 observation favoring Candidate B and Candidate A under +substantial suspicion.** + +Flue can mount and mechanically activate an independent core `elicitation` skill, but the paid +evidence did not satisfy the frozen v2 falsification rule. Under the same v2 gate and S1 fixture, +Candidate B performed the packaged resource route while Candidate A missed the independent route. +That is one candidate-differentiating observation under the topology manipulation, not enough to +establish reliable behavior: B failed S1's composition-quality requirement, both S4 runs bypassed +the job skill, paid S2 was not exercised, and the planned replications were stopped. + +The current one-skill packaging remains the architectural fallback because Mission 4 already +authorizes it, not because v2 proved it behaviorally successful. No v2 prose should be promoted. + +## V2 intervention and parity + +V2 changed only the shared interactive routing gate, with one normalized topology-specific action +line. The hermetic probe established: + +- both candidates crossed the same built production `ChatAgent`; +- A advertised `sdcpn-modelling` and `elicitation`, and B advertised only `sdcpn-modelling`; +- universal substance was byte-identical in A's skill instructions and B's resource; +- replacing A's required-action line with B's made the plugin instructions byte-identical; +- S1/S4 could follow each topology's required universal route; +- S2/S3 could proceed without universal disclosure; and +- no construction tools or undisclosed selected v2 universal resource entered the harness. The + unchanged production system prompt still contains its legacy always-on universal guidance. + +The faux evidence proves mechanics and restraint of the harness, not model judgment. + +## Paid evidence + +### S1 — underspecified interactive request + +| Dimension | Candidate A — independent | Candidate B — packaged | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Job routing | Pass: activated `sdcpn-modelling` | Pass: activated `sdcpn-modelling` | +| Capability routing | Fail: did not activate advertised `elicitation` | Pass: read universal and SDCPN elicitation resources | +| Universal judgment | Fail: asked four orientation questions as a batch | Fail: asked purpose and boundary as a two-question batch | +| Plugin judgment | Pass: stayed in approval-process purpose and scope | Pass: stayed in purpose, boundary, and concrete-case process concerns | +| Composition | Fail: universal content never entered context | Fail: both bodies entered context, but the consequential action violated their one-focused-question contract | +| Restraint | Indeterminate: S2/S3 restraint was not exercised | Indeterminate: S2/S3 restraint was not exercised | +| Disclosure | `sdcpn-modelling` only | `sdcpn-modelling`, `universal-elicitation.md`, `sdcpn-elicitation.md`, and an unnecessary early `workpiece-template.md` read | +| Evidence honesty | Pass | Pass | + +The pair differentiates the candidates under the topology manipulation. A stronger shared gate +did not cause A to invoke the independent capability; B did follow the resource path, with +progressive-disclosure overreach from reading the workpiece template before creating or revising a +workpiece. + +### S4 — review exposing a human-knowledge gap + +| Dimension | Candidate A — independent | Candidate B — packaged | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Job routing | Fail: no skill activation | Fail: no skill activation | +| Capability routing | Fail: no universal disclosure | Fail: no universal disclosure | +| Universal judgment | Fail: universal content was absent and the response did not ask the focused question | Indeterminate: it asked the stated distinction, but the prompt itself supplied both alternatives and universal content was absent | +| Plugin judgment | Indeterminate attribution: identified the unsupported target choice without loading plugin judgment | Indeterminate attribution for the same reason | +| Composition | Fail: neither body entered context | Fail: neither body entered context | +| Restraint | Indeterminate: S2/S3 restraint was not exercised | Indeterminate: S2/S3 restraint was not exercised | +| Disclosure | None | None | +| Evidence honesty | Pass | Pass | + +S4 exposed the same non-discriminating job-routing symptom in both candidates before topology. +The stop rule therefore ended paid execution before S2 or replications; continuing could not +repair attribution. + +## Cost and stopping + +V2 used 4 scenario runs, 7 model invocations, 39,338 total tokens, 28,938 ms summed model latency, +and USD 0.04946605. + +Across v1 and v2, paid activity used 6 scenario runs, 11 model invocations, 56,812 total tokens, +41,859 ms summed model latency, and USD 0.07364855. This remained below the user-amended ceilings +of 48 model invocations and USD 1.00. + +## Decision + +The bounded evidence shows one independent-activation strain rather than a Flue mounting failure: + +1. Hermetic A can activate both skills and receives their full instructions. +2. Real-model A missed `elicitation` in v1 S1, but that run was non-discriminating because v1 B + also missed disclosure. +3. Real-model A missed `elicitation` after v2 made the disclosure gate explicit. +4. Real-model B followed the packaged resource route under the same v2 gate and fixture. + +Only the v2 S1 pair isolates topology, and it was not replicated. B also did not pass the complete +S1 action contract or either S4 composition gate. The protocol's condition for falsifying A was +therefore not met. + +Retain the current one-skill production authority and do not amend `MISSION.md` to promote A. +Record Candidate A as materially risky and Candidate B as favored by one candidate-differentiating +routing observation. The remaining failures—job-skill routing on review, question dosage after +successful resource disclosure, and premature workpiece-resource loading—belong to owner-led +Mission 4 runbook work, not another topology campaign under this side quest. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/manifest.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/manifest.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1c08c0f5aa7 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/manifest.json @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ +{ + "sideQuestId": "flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2", + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "sourceState": "dirty side-quest instrument; every instrument file is content-addressed below", + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "runtime": { + "boundary": "built production ChatAgent loaded from apps/brunch-agent/dist/app.mjs", + "flue": "2.0.3", + "hermeticProvider": "@earendil-works/pi-ai faux provider 0.83.0", + "constructionToolsMounted": false, + "stop": "first consequential question, finding, or construction decision" + }, + "intervention": "Replace only the shared interactive routing sentence with the frozen v2 required-disclosure gate; normalize the one candidate-specific action line for parity.", + "candidateRenderedText": { + "independentPluginActivation": "runs/hermetic/independent-S1.json#/toolCalls/0/output", + "independentElicitationActivation": "runs/hermetic/independent-S1.json#/toolCalls/1/output", + "packagedPluginActivation": "runs/hermetic/packaged-S1.json#/toolCalls/0/output", + "packagedUniversalResource": "runs/hermetic/packaged-S1.json#/toolCalls/1/output" + }, + "sourceSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "6a1bbb68da22eed1f1179aa133bb9f41a094ef9162300a14c30661f9bad2e0b7", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "b6aa515d5805ef0f7f637cd58afc350d4ae67ff9612d78f2f3f434c90519628b", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "451a12b35374721f32cd9b5aac85a29ff8c8ee66741afb1b2360bc172dbc8fe8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "c04354de75321d89c33ef98e823d670275a4d1f8dbd659bb326a833450792e41", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/scenarios.json": "10e5b6897319045485a33e556d1de05241cbdbe9ddf5e8fa6c72ef73199252c1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/protocol.md": "1ff13a4c5e30c698dd5d2ac252074597639b620b1d9cbaf4d1380fcaa3f9ca32", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md": "c16d5faaa7a450a41d6888dd6d2b3eac88e4687779b0c8f8e6fe4eceeeb241c6", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "b4959142f10c74e9b04a5d0c0dfb3b74dbab8c492a26e34d2c2c8ff9e3eb7cfa" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The v2 required-action line uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A adds the mechanically required elicitation skill name and activation-cue description." + ] + }, + "hermeticRuns": [ + "runs/hermetic/independent-S1.json", + "runs/hermetic/packaged-S1.json", + "runs/hermetic/independent-S2.json", + "runs/hermetic/packaged-S2.json", + "runs/hermetic/independent-S3.json", + "runs/hermetic/packaged-S3.json", + "runs/hermetic/independent-S4.json", + "runs/hermetic/packaged-S4.json" + ], + "paidRuns": [ + "runs/paid/independent-S1-r1.json", + "runs/paid/packaged-S1-r1.json", + "runs/paid/independent-S4-r1.json", + "runs/paid/packaged-S4-r1.json" + ], + "budget": { + "cumulativeAuthorizedModelInvocations": 48, + "v1ModelInvocations": 4, + "v2ModelInvocations": 7, + "cumulativeModelInvocations": 11, + "cumulativeAuthorizedUsd": 1, + "v1Usd": 0.0241825, + "v2Usd": 0.04946605, + "cumulativeUsd": 0.07364855, + "stopReason": "Both S4 candidates bypassed sdcpn-modelling, creating a shared job-routing failure before topology; the side-quest stop rule forbids continuing to S2 or replications." + }, + "outcome": "invalid-or-inconclusive" +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/hermetic/independent-S1.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/hermetic/independent-S1.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cbb9f295c76 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/hermetic/independent-S1.json @@ -0,0 +1,2858 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v2-independent-s1-2461777f", + "phase": "hermetic", + "instrumentVersion": "v2", + "candidate": "independent", + "scenarioId": "S1", + "scenario": { + "title": "Underspecified interactive request", + "prompt": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "stopAfter": "The first consequential question.", + "expected": "Ask one high-yield question in operational vocabulary after loading universal and SDCPN elicitation judgment." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling", "elicitation"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling", "elicitation"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "elicitation" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [ + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "sha256": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf" + } + ], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 5, + "inputTokens": 2963, + "outputTokens": 11, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 2963, + "totalTokens": 5937, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3, + "inputTokens": 1970, + "outputTokens": 10, + "cacheReadTokens": 2248, + "cacheWriteTokens": 1971, + "totalTokens": 6199, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3, + "inputTokens": 4349, + "outputTokens": 30, + "cacheReadTokens": 3502, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4349, + "totalTokens": 12230, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 4, + "inputTokens": 4895, + "outputTokens": 32, + "cacheReadTokens": 7135, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16957, + "cost": 0 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 15, + "inputTokens": 14177, + "outputTokens": 83, + "cacheReadTokens": 12885, + "cacheWriteTokens": 14178, + "totalTokens": 41323, + "cost": 0 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nHelp me model our approval process as an SDCPN.\n\n## Assistant\nWhat decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?\n- tool activate_skill (activate-sdcpn): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\\n\\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\\n\\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\\n\\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\\n\\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\\n\"\n- tool activate_skill (activate-elicitation): \"Run the skill named \\\"elicitation\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\\n\\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\\n\\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Work from purpose\\n\\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\\n\\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\\n\\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\\n\\n### Follow the person's account\\n\\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\\n\\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\\n\\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\\n\\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\\n\\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\\n\\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\\n\\n### Treat divergence as information\\n\\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\\n\\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\\n\\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\\n\\n### Stop honestly\\n\\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\\n\\n### Vague or compressed language\\n\\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\\n\\n### Normative language\\n\\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\\n\\n### Tension within or between accounts\\n\\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\\n\\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\\n\\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\\n\\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\\n\\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\\n\\n### Diminishing yield\\n\\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\\n\\n### Assent without independent wording\\n\\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\\n\\n### Silence and absence\\n\\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\\n\\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\\n\\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\\n\\n### Slice a concrete case\\n\\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\\n\\n### Sweep one property\\n\\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\\n\\n### Ask for the last occurrence\\n\\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\\n\\n### Ask for the basis\\n\\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\\n\\n### Ground a term or artifact\\n\\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\\n\\n### Clarify until observable\\n\\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\\n\\n### Use contrastive cases\\n\\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\\n\\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\\n\\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\\n\\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\\n\\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\\n\\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\\n\\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\\n\\n### Restate for correction\\n\\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\\n\\n### Propose structure for correction\\n\\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\\n\\n### Deposit and defer\\n\\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\\n\\n### Press without trapping\\n\\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\\n\\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\\n\\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\\n\\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\\n\\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\\n\\n### Trade concrete outcomes\\n\\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\\n\\n### Close with one correction opportunity\\n\\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\\n\\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\\n\\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\\n\\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\\n\\n### Before asking\\n\\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\\n\\n### Before recording\\n\\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\\n\\n### Before closing\\n\\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-sdcpn-elicitation.md): \"# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\\n\\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\\n\\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\\n\\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\\n\\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\\n\\n### Keep target structure backstage\\n\\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\\n\\n### Preserve operational context\\n\\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\\n\\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\\n\\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\\n\\n### Language and account signals\\n\\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\\n\\n### Operational situation patterns\\n\\n#### Timed work\\n\\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\\n\\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\\n\\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\\n\\n#### Contended resource\\n\\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\\n\\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\\n\\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\\n\\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\\n\\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\\n\\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\\n\\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\\n\\n#### Mode change\\n\\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\\n\\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\\n\\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\\n\\n#### Spatial transfer\\n\\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\\n\\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\\n\\n#### Policy under pressure\\n\\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\\n\\n#### Hidden waiting\\n\\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\\n\\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\\n\\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\\n\\n### Link the slice to the objective\\n\\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\\n\\n### Expose the process spine\\n\\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\\n\\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\\n\\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\\n\\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\\n\\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\\n\\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\\n\\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\\n\\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\\n\\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\\n\\n### Close a resource account\\n\\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\\n\\n### Close a mode change in both directions\\n\\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\\n\\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\\n\\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\\n\\n### Ask what is conserved\\n\\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\\n\\n### Establish retry scope\\n\\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\\n\\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\\n\\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\\n\\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\\n\\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\\n\\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\\n\\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\\n\\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\\n\\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\\n\\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\\n\\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\\n\\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\\n\\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\\n\\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\\n\\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\\n\\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\\n\\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\\n\\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\\n\\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\\n\\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\\n\\n### Purpose and process\\n\\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\\n\\n### Operational semantics\\n\\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\\n\\n### Quantities and context\\n\\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000024", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFFVE4yWFlFQlo5WFZYNVNIRUdNTlY5", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1ETN2Z3JBGW34P2XKRMPKYF", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2Z14RT9R95ZHHP212AC", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 4 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "elicitation" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n", + "durationMs": 1 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1ETN2XZRSEXM1BSA5ZNXTXD" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.120Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.124Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.147Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.153Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2Z14RT9R95ZHHP212AC", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.153Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2Z14RT9R95ZHHP212AC", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277852931:1a7qk26s8s", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.153Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277852931:1a7qk26s8s", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2963, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2963, + "totalTokens": 5937, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277852931 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2Z14RT9R95ZHHP212AC", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.156Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\":\"sdcpn-model", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2Z14RT9R95ZHHP212AC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.156Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "ling\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2Z14RT9R95ZHHP212AC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.157Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2Z14RT9R95ZHHP212AC", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 5, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277852931:1a7qk26s8s", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2963, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2963, + "totalTokens": 5937, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.158Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277852931:1a7qk26s8s", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2963, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2963, + "totalTokens": 5937, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277852931 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2Z14RT9R95ZHHP212AC", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.159Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2Z14RT9R95ZHHP212AC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.161Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277853164 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2Z14RT9R95ZHHP212AC", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.164Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277853164 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2Z14RT9R95ZHHP212AC", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.164Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 4, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2Z14RT9R95ZHHP212AC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.165Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2Z14RT9R95ZHHP212AC", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277852931:1a7qk26s8s", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2963, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2963, + "totalTokens": 5937, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277852931 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277853164 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.165Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZETEJDJA0WE2SN6JPQ", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.166Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZETEJDJA0WE2SN6JPQ", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277852931:1a7qk26s8s", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.166Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277852931:1a7qk26s8s", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 2248, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 6199, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277852931 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZETEJDJA0WE2SN6JPQ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.167Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\":\"elicitation", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZETEJDJA0WE2SN6JPQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.168Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZETEJDJA0WE2SN6JPQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.168Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZETEJDJA0WE2SN6JPQ", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277852931:1a7qk26s8s", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 2248, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 6199, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.169Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277852931:1a7qk26s8s", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 2248, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 6199, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277852931 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZETEJDJA0WE2SN6JPQ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.169Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZETEJDJA0WE2SN6JPQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.169Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277853171 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZETEJDJA0WE2SN6JPQ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.171Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277853171 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZETEJDJA0WE2SN6JPQ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.171Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + } + }, + "durationMs": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZETEJDJA0WE2SN6JPQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.172Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZETEJDJA0WE2SN6JPQ", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277852931:1a7qk26s8s", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 2248, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 6199, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277852931 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277853171 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.172Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZNSKGVE38EQNMHHKDJ", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.173Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZNSKGVE38EQNMHHKDJ", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277852931:1a7qk26s8s", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.173Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277852931:1a7qk26s8s", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4349, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3502, + "cacheWrite": 4349, + "totalTokens": 12230, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277853174 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZNSKGVE38EQNMHHKDJ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.174Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.flue/pack", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZNSKGVE38EQNMHHKDJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.175Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "aged-skills/skill%3A", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZNSKGVE38EQNMHHKDJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.175Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "sdcpn-modell", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZNSKGVE38EQNMHHKDJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.175Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "ing%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZNSKGVE38EQNMHHKDJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.175Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "97/sdcpn-elicitation", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZNSKGVE38EQNMHHKDJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.175Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": ".md\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZNSKGVE38EQNMHHKDJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.175Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZNSKGVE38EQNMHHKDJ", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277852931:1a7qk26s8s", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 4349, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3502, + "cacheWrite": 4349, + "totalTokens": 12230, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.176Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277852931:1a7qk26s8s", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4349, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3502, + "cacheWrite": 4349, + "totalTokens": 12230, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277853174 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZNSKGVE38EQNMHHKDJ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.176Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZNSKGVE38EQNMHHKDJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.176Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277853178 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZNSKGVE38EQNMHHKDJ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.178Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277853178 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZNSKGVE38EQNMHHKDJ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.178Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + } + }, + "durationMs": 2, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZNSKGVE38EQNMHHKDJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.179Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZNSKGVE38EQNMHHKDJ", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277852931:1a7qk26s8s", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4349, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3502, + "cacheWrite": 4349, + "totalTokens": 12230, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277853174 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277853178 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.180Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZX6GF5W67BVXYV3XS0", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.181Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZX6GF5W67BVXYV3XS0", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277852931:1a7qk26s8s", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.181Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277852931:1a7qk26s8s", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 32, + "cacheRead": 7135, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16957, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277852932 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZX6GF5W67BVXYV3XS0", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.182Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "What decision sh", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZX6GF5W67BVXYV3XS0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.185Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ould this mo", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZX6GF5W67BVXYV3XS0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.185Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "del support,", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZX6GF5W67BVXYV3XS0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.185Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " and can you walk me", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZX6GF5W67BVXYV3XS0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.185Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " through the las", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZX6GF5W67BVXYV3XS0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.185Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "t approval r", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZX6GF5W67BVXYV3XS0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.185Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "equest from subm", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZX6GF5W67BVXYV3XS0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.185Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ission to it", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZX6GF5W67BVXYV3XS0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.185Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "s outcome?", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZX6GF5W67BVXYV3XS0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.185Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZX6GF5W67BVXYV3XS0", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277852931:1a7qk26s8s", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?" + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 32, + "cacheRead": 7135, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16957, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.185Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277852931:1a7qk26s8s", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 32, + "cacheRead": 7135, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16957, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277852932 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZX6GF5W67BVXYV3XS0", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.185Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN2ZX6GF5W67BVXYV3XS0", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277852931:1a7qk26s8s", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 32, + "cacheRead": 7135, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16957, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277852932 + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 57, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.187Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277852931:1a7qk26s8s", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2963, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2963, + "totalTokens": 5937, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277852931 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277853164 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277852931:1a7qk26s8s", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 2248, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 6199, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277852931 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277853171 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277852931:1a7qk26s8s", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4349, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3502, + "cacheWrite": 4349, + "totalTokens": 12230, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277853174 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277853178 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277852931:1a7qk26s8s", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 32, + "cacheRead": 7135, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16957, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277852932 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 58, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.187Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 41, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 59, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.188Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN2Y1K9WSXWTEJ52MJ36W", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN2YV17C79H992XZMCX4K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 60, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.188Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN2XYEBZ9XVX5SHEGMNV9", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "2b5c4b667fc43c1d5def7c16321ca18ef69e59d5ad15a1539ca167f122d5e671", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 61, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.188Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "6a1bbb68da22eed1f1179aa133bb9f41a094ef9162300a14c30661f9bad2e0b7", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "b6aa515d5805ef0f7f637cd58afc350d4ae67ff9612d78f2f3f434c90519628b", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "451a12b35374721f32cd9b5aac85a29ff8c8ee66741afb1b2360bc172dbc8fe8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "c04354de75321d89c33ef98e823d670275a4d1f8dbd659bb326a833450792e41", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/scenarios.json": "10e5b6897319045485a33e556d1de05241cbdbe9ddf5e8fa6c72ef73199252c1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/protocol.md": "1ff13a4c5e30c698dd5d2ac252074597639b620b1d9cbaf4d1380fcaa3f9ca32", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md": "c16d5faaa7a450a41d6888dd6d2b3eac88e4687779b0c8f8e6fe4eceeeb241c6", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "b4959142f10c74e9b04a5d0c0dfb3b74dbab8c492a26e34d2c2c8ff9e3eb7cfa" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/hermetic/independent-S2.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/hermetic/independent-S2.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..bc4b9d430bc --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/hermetic/independent-S2.json @@ -0,0 +1,3000 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v2-independent-s2-a671edda", + "phase": "hermetic", + "instrumentVersion": "v2", + "candidate": "independent", + "scenarioId": "S2", + "scenario": { + "title": "Adequate construct-only request", + "prompt": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them.", + "stopAfter": "The first consequential construction decision.", + "expected": "Enter construction guidance without loading universal elicitation or asking a question." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome.", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling", "elicitation"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + }, + "output": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + }, + "output": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [ + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md", + "sha256": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694" + }, + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "sha256": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5" + } + ], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 5, + "inputTokens": 3252, + "outputTokens": 11, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 3252, + "totalTokens": 6515, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 4, + "inputTokens": 1970, + "outputTokens": 29, + "cacheReadTokens": 2537, + "cacheWriteTokens": 1971, + "totalTokens": 6507, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3, + "inputTokens": 3142, + "outputTokens": 27, + "cacheReadTokens": 3791, + "cacheWriteTokens": 3142, + "totalTokens": 10102, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 5, + "inputTokens": 2000, + "outputTokens": 46, + "cacheReadTokens": 6217, + "cacheWriteTokens": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10263, + "cost": 0 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 17, + "inputTokens": 10364, + "outputTokens": 113, + "cacheReadTokens": 12545, + "cacheWriteTokens": 10365, + "totalTokens": 33387, + "cost": 0 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nUse the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them.\n\n## Assistant\nFirst, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome.\n- tool activate_skill (activate-sdcpn): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\\n\\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\\n\\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\\n\\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\\n\\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-pn-construction.md): \"# SDCPN Construction\\n\\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\\n\\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\\n\\n## Construction boundary\\n\\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\\n\\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\\n\\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\\n\\n## Mapping principles\\n\\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\\n| --- | --- |\\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\\n\\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\\n\\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\\n\\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\\n\\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\\n\\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\\n\\n## Construction patterns\\n\\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\\n\\n### Timed work\\n\\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\\n\\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\\n\\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\\n\\n### Contended resource\\n\\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\\n\\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\\n\\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\\n\\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\\n\\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\\n\\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\\n\\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\\n\\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\\n\\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\\n\\n### Mode change\\n\\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\\n\\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\\n\\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\\n\\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\\n\\n### Spatial transfer\\n\\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\\n\\n### Hidden waiting\\n\\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\\n\\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\\n\\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\\n\\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\\n\\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\\n\\nNot acceptable:\\n\\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\\n\\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\\n\\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\\n\\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\\n\\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\\n\\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-checks.md): \"# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\\n\\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\\n\\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\\n\\n## Before construction\\n\\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\\n\\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\\n\\n## During construction\\n\\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\\n\\n## Structural validity\\n\\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\\n\\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\\n\\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\\n\\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\\n\\n## Existing-net revision\\n\\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\\n\\n## Delivery\\n\\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\\n\\nState plainly:\\n\\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\\n\\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000024", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFFVE4zRlYyUEdRMk5EMlJEQUhRVFdN", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1ETN3GZ15RJVKNAAQ0QCY8H", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3GXJC9RXCG0PT89ANA1", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 4 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + }, + "output": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + }, + "output": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1ETN3FW9TTR7J4N37QG3C8N" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.693Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.696Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.719Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.724Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3GXJC9RXCG0PT89ANA1", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.725Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3GXJC9RXCG0PT89ANA1", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277853528:2w1rb1vry7e", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.726Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277853528:2w1rb1vry7e", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3252, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3252, + "totalTokens": 6515, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277853528 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3GXJC9RXCG0PT89ANA1", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.728Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\":\"sdcpn-m", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3GXJC9RXCG0PT89ANA1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.728Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "odelling\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3GXJC9RXCG0PT89ANA1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.728Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3GXJC9RXCG0PT89ANA1", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 5, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277853528:2w1rb1vry7e", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3252, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3252, + "totalTokens": 6515, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.731Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277853528:2w1rb1vry7e", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3252, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3252, + "totalTokens": 6515, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277853528 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3GXJC9RXCG0PT89ANA1", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.731Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3GXJC9RXCG0PT89ANA1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.733Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277853736 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3GXJC9RXCG0PT89ANA1", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.736Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277853736 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3GXJC9RXCG0PT89ANA1", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.736Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 4, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3GXJC9RXCG0PT89ANA1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.737Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3GXJC9RXCG0PT89ANA1", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277853528:2w1rb1vry7e", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3252, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3252, + "totalTokens": 6515, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277853528 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277853736 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.737Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HAKQA2KVEBAN1XVFB0", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.738Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HAKQA2KVEBAN1XVFB0", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277853528:2w1rb1vry7e", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.738Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277853528:2w1rb1vry7e", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2537, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 6507, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277853739 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HAKQA2KVEBAN1XVFB0", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.740Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.f", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HAKQA2KVEBAN1XVFB0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.741Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "lue/packaged", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HAKQA2KVEBAN1XVFB0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.741Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "-skills/skil", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HAKQA2KVEBAN1XVFB0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.741Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "l%3Asdcpn-mo", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HAKQA2KVEBAN1XVFB0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.741Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "delling%3Aa6", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HAKQA2KVEBAN1XVFB0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.741Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "3c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-co", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HAKQA2KVEBAN1XVFB0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.741Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "nstruction.m", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HAKQA2KVEBAN1XVFB0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.741Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "d\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HAKQA2KVEBAN1XVFB0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.741Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HAKQA2KVEBAN1XVFB0", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277853528:2w1rb1vry7e", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2537, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 6507, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.742Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277853528:2w1rb1vry7e", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2537, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 6507, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277853739 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HAKQA2KVEBAN1XVFB0", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.742Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HAKQA2KVEBAN1XVFB0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.742Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277853744 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HAKQA2KVEBAN1XVFB0", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.744Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277853744 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HAKQA2KVEBAN1XVFB0", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.744Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + } + }, + "durationMs": 2, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HAKQA2KVEBAN1XVFB0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.745Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HAKQA2KVEBAN1XVFB0", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277853528:2w1rb1vry7e", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2537, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 6507, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277853739 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277853744 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.745Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HJA1C3ZDAZGBC38ZDP", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.746Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HJA1C3ZDAZGBC38ZDP", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277853528:2w1rb1vry7e", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.746Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277853528:2w1rb1vry7e", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3791, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 10102, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277853747 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HJA1C3ZDAZGBC38ZDP", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.748Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.flue/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HJA1C3ZDAZGBC38ZDP", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.748Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "packaged-skills/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HJA1C3ZDAZGBC38ZDP", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.748Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "skill%3Asdcpn-modell", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HJA1C3ZDAZGBC38ZDP", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.748Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "ing%3Aa63c18", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HJA1C3ZDAZGBC38ZDP", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.748Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "f6ff2bfa97/check", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HJA1C3ZDAZGBC38ZDP", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.748Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "s.md\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HJA1C3ZDAZGBC38ZDP", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.748Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HJA1C3ZDAZGBC38ZDP", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277853528:2w1rb1vry7e", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3791, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 10102, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.749Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277853528:2w1rb1vry7e", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3791, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 10102, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277853747 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HJA1C3ZDAZGBC38ZDP", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.749Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HJA1C3ZDAZGBC38ZDP", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.750Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277853751 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HJA1C3ZDAZGBC38ZDP", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.751Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277853751 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HJA1C3ZDAZGBC38ZDP", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.751Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + } + }, + "durationMs": 2, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HJA1C3ZDAZGBC38ZDP", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.751Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HJA1C3ZDAZGBC38ZDP", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277853528:2w1rb1vry7e", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3791, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 10102, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277853747 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277853751 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.752Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HSDV1DCC1N3RZKC59R", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.753Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HSDV1DCC1N3RZKC59R", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277853528:2w1rb1vry7e", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.753Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277853528:2w1rb1vry7e", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 46, + "cacheRead": 6217, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10263, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277853528 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HSDV1DCC1N3RZKC59R", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.754Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "First, factor the ti", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HSDV1DCC1N3RZKC59R", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.757Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "med review i", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HSDV1DCC1N3RZKC59R", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.757Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "nto start, in-progre", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HSDV1DCC1N3RZKC59R", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.757Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ss, approval, an", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HSDV1DCC1N3RZKC59R", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.757Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "d rejection ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HSDV1DCC1N3RZKC59R", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.757Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "transitions so the r", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HSDV1DCC1N3RZKC59R", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 57, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.757Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "eviewer token is res", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HSDV1DCC1N3RZKC59R", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 58, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.757Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "erved during the 20-", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HSDV1DCC1N3RZKC59R", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 59, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.757Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "minute check and ret", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HSDV1DCC1N3RZKC59R", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 60, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.757Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "urned on either ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HSDV1DCC1N3RZKC59R", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 61, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.757Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "outcome.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HSDV1DCC1N3RZKC59R", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 62, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.757Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HSDV1DCC1N3RZKC59R", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 5, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277853528:2w1rb1vry7e", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome." + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 46, + "cacheRead": 6217, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10263, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 63, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.758Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277853528:2w1rb1vry7e", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 46, + "cacheRead": 6217, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10263, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277853528 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HSDV1DCC1N3RZKC59R", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 64, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.758Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN3HSDV1DCC1N3RZKC59R", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277853528:2w1rb1vry7e", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 46, + "cacheRead": 6217, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10263, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277853528 + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 65, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.759Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277853528:2w1rb1vry7e", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3252, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3252, + "totalTokens": 6515, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277853528 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277853736 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277853528:2w1rb1vry7e", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2537, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 6507, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277853739 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277853744 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277853528:2w1rb1vry7e", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3791, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 10102, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277853747 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277853751 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277853528:2w1rb1vry7e", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 46, + "cacheRead": 6217, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10263, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277853528 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 66, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.759Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 41, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 67, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.760Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN3FYE11PPA3EGX3EWK4R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN3GQV6W70RJWD5PAD7QD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 68, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.760Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN3FV2PGQ2ND2RDAHQTWM", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "ef3c09509983a696ab41eead228c92b6f27e0b5a20e53ce3e229076698422a75", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 69, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:53.760Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "6a1bbb68da22eed1f1179aa133bb9f41a094ef9162300a14c30661f9bad2e0b7", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "b6aa515d5805ef0f7f637cd58afc350d4ae67ff9612d78f2f3f434c90519628b", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "451a12b35374721f32cd9b5aac85a29ff8c8ee66741afb1b2360bc172dbc8fe8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "c04354de75321d89c33ef98e823d670275a4d1f8dbd659bb326a833450792e41", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/scenarios.json": "10e5b6897319045485a33e556d1de05241cbdbe9ddf5e8fa6c72ef73199252c1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/protocol.md": "1ff13a4c5e30c698dd5d2ac252074597639b620b1d9cbaf4d1380fcaa3f9ca32", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md": "c16d5faaa7a450a41d6888dd6d2b3eac88e4687779b0c8f8e6fe4eceeeb241c6", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "b4959142f10c74e9b04a5d0c0dfb3b74dbab8c492a26e34d2c2c8ff9e3eb7cfa" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/hermetic/independent-S3.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/hermetic/independent-S3.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f089d7a11b4 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/hermetic/independent-S3.json @@ -0,0 +1,2983 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v2-independent-s3-ae874c64", + "phase": "hermetic", + "instrumentVersion": "v2", + "candidate": "independent", + "scenarioId": "S3", + "scenario": { + "title": "Review with a resolvable target defect", + "prompt": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token.", + "stopAfter": "The first supported defect finding.", + "expected": "Identify the missing reviewer return on rejection without loading universal elicitation." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer.", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling", "elicitation"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + }, + "output": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + }, + "output": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [ + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md", + "sha256": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694" + }, + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "sha256": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5" + } + ], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 5, + "inputTokens": 3125, + "outputTokens": 11, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 3125, + "totalTokens": 6261, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 4, + "inputTokens": 1970, + "outputTokens": 29, + "cacheReadTokens": 2409, + "cacheWriteTokens": 1971, + "totalTokens": 6379, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 2, + "inputTokens": 3141, + "outputTokens": 27, + "cacheReadTokens": 3664, + "cacheWriteTokens": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9974, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 5, + "inputTokens": 2000, + "outputTokens": 45, + "cacheReadTokens": 6090, + "cacheWriteTokens": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10135, + "cost": 0 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 16, + "inputTokens": 10236, + "outputTokens": 112, + "cacheReadTokens": 12163, + "cacheWriteTokens": 10238, + "totalTokens": 32749, + "cost": 0 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nReview the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token.\n\n## Assistant\nThe rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer.\n- tool activate_skill (activate-sdcpn): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\\n\\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\\n\\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\\n\\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\\n\\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-pn-construction.md): \"# SDCPN Construction\\n\\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\\n\\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\\n\\n## Construction boundary\\n\\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\\n\\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\\n\\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\\n\\n## Mapping principles\\n\\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\\n| --- | --- |\\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\\n\\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\\n\\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\\n\\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\\n\\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\\n\\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\\n\\n## Construction patterns\\n\\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\\n\\n### Timed work\\n\\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\\n\\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\\n\\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\\n\\n### Contended resource\\n\\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\\n\\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\\n\\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\\n\\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\\n\\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\\n\\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\\n\\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\\n\\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\\n\\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\\n\\n### Mode change\\n\\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\\n\\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\\n\\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\\n\\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\\n\\n### Spatial transfer\\n\\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\\n\\n### Hidden waiting\\n\\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\\n\\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\\n\\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\\n\\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\\n\\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\\n\\nNot acceptable:\\n\\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\\n\\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\\n\\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\\n\\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\\n\\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\\n\\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-checks.md): \"# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\\n\\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\\n\\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\\n\\n## Before construction\\n\\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\\n\\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\\n\\n## During construction\\n\\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\\n\\n## Structural validity\\n\\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\\n\\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\\n\\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\\n\\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\\n\\n## Existing-net revision\\n\\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\\n\\n## Delivery\\n\\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\\n\\nState plainly:\\n\\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\\n\\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000024", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFFVE40MVZIQTE4OUdBN1c0SFFSQjRX", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1ETN430RF0020B49RQPZKTB", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN42YH5X3H6WVYE4TY018", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 5 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + }, + "output": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n", + "durationMs": 1 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + }, + "output": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1ETN41W6BXBEHP1PWFS0ZCE" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.269Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.272Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.296Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.302Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN42YH5X3H6WVYE4TY018", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.302Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN42YH5X3H6WVYE4TY018", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277854097:vs6y7fznzu", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.302Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277854097:vs6y7fznzu", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3125, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3125, + "totalTokens": 6261, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277854097 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN42YH5X3H6WVYE4TY018", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.305Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\":\"sdcpn-model", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN42YH5X3H6WVYE4TY018", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.305Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "ling\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN42YH5X3H6WVYE4TY018", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.305Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN42YH5X3H6WVYE4TY018", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 5, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277854097:vs6y7fznzu", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3125, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3125, + "totalTokens": 6261, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.307Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277854097:vs6y7fznzu", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3125, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3125, + "totalTokens": 6261, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277854097 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN42YH5X3H6WVYE4TY018", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.307Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN42YH5X3H6WVYE4TY018", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.309Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277854313 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN42YH5X3H6WVYE4TY018", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.313Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277854313 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN42YH5X3H6WVYE4TY018", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.313Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 5, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN42YH5X3H6WVYE4TY018", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.314Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN42YH5X3H6WVYE4TY018", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277854097:vs6y7fznzu", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3125, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3125, + "totalTokens": 6261, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277854097 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277854313 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.314Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43BZR02KDVV2QXQV8HH", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.315Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43BZR02KDVV2QXQV8HH", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277854097:vs6y7fznzu", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.315Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277854097:vs6y7fznzu", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2409, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 6379, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277854316 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43BZR02KDVV2QXQV8HH", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.317Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.f", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43BZR02KDVV2QXQV8HH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.317Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "lue/packaged-ski", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43BZR02KDVV2QXQV8HH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.318Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "lls/skill%3A", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43BZR02KDVV2QXQV8HH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.318Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "sdcpn-modelling%", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43BZR02KDVV2QXQV8HH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.318Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43BZR02KDVV2QXQV8HH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.318Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "97/pn-constructi", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43BZR02KDVV2QXQV8HH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.318Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "on.md\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43BZR02KDVV2QXQV8HH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.318Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43BZR02KDVV2QXQV8HH", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277854097:vs6y7fznzu", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2409, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 6379, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.319Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277854097:vs6y7fznzu", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2409, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 6379, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277854316 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43BZR02KDVV2QXQV8HH", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.319Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43BZR02KDVV2QXQV8HH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.319Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277854321 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43BZR02KDVV2QXQV8HH", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.321Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277854321 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43BZR02KDVV2QXQV8HH", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.321Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + } + }, + "durationMs": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43BZR02KDVV2QXQV8HH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.321Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43BZR02KDVV2QXQV8HH", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277854097:vs6y7fznzu", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2409, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 6379, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277854316 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277854321 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.322Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43KT3QEZEDZVVM2MS1G", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.323Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43KT3QEZEDZVVM2MS1G", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277854097:vs6y7fznzu", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.323Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277854097:vs6y7fznzu", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3141, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3664, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9974, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277854323 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43KT3QEZEDZVVM2MS1G", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.324Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.flue/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43KT3QEZEDZVVM2MS1G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.324Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "packaged-skills/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43KT3QEZEDZVVM2MS1G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.324Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "skill%3Asdcpn-mo", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43KT3QEZEDZVVM2MS1G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.324Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "delling%3Aa6", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43KT3QEZEDZVVM2MS1G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.324Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "3c18f6ff2bfa97/check", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43KT3QEZEDZVVM2MS1G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.324Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "s.md\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43KT3QEZEDZVVM2MS1G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.324Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43KT3QEZEDZVVM2MS1G", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 2, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277854097:vs6y7fznzu", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3141, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3664, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9974, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.325Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277854097:vs6y7fznzu", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3141, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3664, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9974, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277854323 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43KT3QEZEDZVVM2MS1G", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.325Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43KT3QEZEDZVVM2MS1G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.325Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277854327 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43KT3QEZEDZVVM2MS1G", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.327Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277854327 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43KT3QEZEDZVVM2MS1G", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.327Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + } + }, + "durationMs": 2, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43KT3QEZEDZVVM2MS1G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.328Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43KT3QEZEDZVVM2MS1G", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277854097:vs6y7fznzu", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3141, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3664, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9974, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277854323 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277854327 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.328Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43SV7MB4PGJFSE4DW9W", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.329Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43SV7MB4PGJFSE4DW9W", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277854097:vs6y7fznzu", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.329Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277854097:vs6y7fznzu", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 45, + "cacheRead": 6090, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10135, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277854097 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43SV7MB4PGJFSE4DW9W", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.330Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "The rejection path l", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43SV7MB4PGJFSE4DW9W", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.333Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "eaks the reusabl", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43SV7MB4PGJFSE4DW9W", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.333Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "e reviewer token", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43SV7MB4PGJFSE4DW9W", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.333Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": ": the accoun", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43SV7MB4PGJFSE4DW9W", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.333Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "t requires relea", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43SV7MB4PGJFSE4DW9W", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.333Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "se after either ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43SV7MB4PGJFSE4DW9W", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.333Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "outcome, but RecordR", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43SV7MB4PGJFSE4DW9W", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 57, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.333Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ejection has no outp", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43SV7MB4PGJFSE4DW9W", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 58, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.333Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ut arc returning", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43SV7MB4PGJFSE4DW9W", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 59, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.333Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " it to AvailableRevi", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43SV7MB4PGJFSE4DW9W", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 60, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.333Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ewer.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43SV7MB4PGJFSE4DW9W", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 61, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.333Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43SV7MB4PGJFSE4DW9W", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 5, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277854097:vs6y7fznzu", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer." + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 45, + "cacheRead": 6090, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10135, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 62, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.334Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277854097:vs6y7fznzu", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 45, + "cacheRead": 6090, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10135, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277854097 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43SV7MB4PGJFSE4DW9W", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 63, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.334Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN43SV7MB4PGJFSE4DW9W", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277854097:vs6y7fznzu", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 45, + "cacheRead": 6090, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10135, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277854097 + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 64, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.335Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277854097:vs6y7fznzu", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3125, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3125, + "totalTokens": 6261, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277854097 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277854313 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277854097:vs6y7fznzu", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2409, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 6379, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277854316 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277854321 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277854097:vs6y7fznzu", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3141, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3664, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9974, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277854323 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277854327 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277854097:vs6y7fznzu", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 45, + "cacheRead": 6090, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10135, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277854097 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 65, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.335Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 40, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 66, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.336Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN41YTEMMJ4XPKKM5WQWD", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN42RB52XAQT5B14BGFHB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 67, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.336Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN41VHA189GA7W4HQRB4W", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "585b36f63cb7807fb58d872977ce8c2fc1d1e2d22503387ceef036034aca6bab", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 68, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.336Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "6a1bbb68da22eed1f1179aa133bb9f41a094ef9162300a14c30661f9bad2e0b7", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "b6aa515d5805ef0f7f637cd58afc350d4ae67ff9612d78f2f3f434c90519628b", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "451a12b35374721f32cd9b5aac85a29ff8c8ee66741afb1b2360bc172dbc8fe8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "c04354de75321d89c33ef98e823d670275a4d1f8dbd659bb326a833450792e41", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/scenarios.json": "10e5b6897319045485a33e556d1de05241cbdbe9ddf5e8fa6c72ef73199252c1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/protocol.md": "1ff13a4c5e30c698dd5d2ac252074597639b620b1d9cbaf4d1380fcaa3f9ca32", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md": "c16d5faaa7a450a41d6888dd6d2b3eac88e4687779b0c8f8e6fe4eceeeb241c6", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "b4959142f10c74e9b04a5d0c0dfb3b74dbab8c492a26e34d2c2c8ff9e3eb7cfa" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/hermetic/independent-S4.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/hermetic/independent-S4.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..a6136905525 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/hermetic/independent-S4.json @@ -0,0 +1,2859 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v2-independent-s4-e978b4f0", + "phase": "hermetic", + "instrumentVersion": "v2", + "candidate": "independent", + "scenarioId": "S4", + "scenario": { + "title": "Review exposing a human-knowledge gap", + "prompt": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately.", + "stopAfter": "One focused question about the unresolved release distinction.", + "expected": "Load universal elicitation and ask whether rejection releases the reviewer or retains assignment through appeal." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "When a request is rejected, does that immediately free the reviewer for another request, or do they remain assigned through an appeal window?", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling", "elicitation"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling", "elicitation"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "elicitation" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [ + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "sha256": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf" + } + ], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 4, + "inputTokens": 3102, + "outputTokens": 11, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 3102, + "totalTokens": 6215, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 2, + "inputTokens": 1970, + "outputTokens": 10, + "cacheReadTokens": 2386, + "cacheWriteTokens": 1971, + "totalTokens": 6337, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3, + "inputTokens": 4348, + "outputTokens": 30, + "cacheReadTokens": 3641, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4349, + "totalTokens": 12368, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 4, + "inputTokens": 4895, + "outputTokens": 36, + "cacheReadTokens": 7274, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4895, + "totalTokens": 17100, + "cost": 0 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 13, + "inputTokens": 14315, + "outputTokens": 87, + "cacheReadTokens": 13301, + "cacheWriteTokens": 14317, + "totalTokens": 42020, + "cost": 0 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nReview the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately.\n\n## Assistant\nWhen a request is rejected, does that immediately free the reviewer for another request, or do they remain assigned through an appeal window?\n- tool activate_skill (activate-sdcpn): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\\n\\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\\n\\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\\n\\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\\n\\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\\n\"\n- tool activate_skill (activate-elicitation): \"Run the skill named \\\"elicitation\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\\n\\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\\n\\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Work from purpose\\n\\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\\n\\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\\n\\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\\n\\n### Follow the person's account\\n\\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\\n\\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\\n\\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\\n\\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\\n\\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\\n\\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\\n\\n### Treat divergence as information\\n\\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\\n\\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\\n\\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\\n\\n### Stop honestly\\n\\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\\n\\n### Vague or compressed language\\n\\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\\n\\n### Normative language\\n\\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\\n\\n### Tension within or between accounts\\n\\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\\n\\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\\n\\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\\n\\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\\n\\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\\n\\n### Diminishing yield\\n\\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\\n\\n### Assent without independent wording\\n\\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\\n\\n### Silence and absence\\n\\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\\n\\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\\n\\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\\n\\n### Slice a concrete case\\n\\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\\n\\n### Sweep one property\\n\\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\\n\\n### Ask for the last occurrence\\n\\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\\n\\n### Ask for the basis\\n\\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\\n\\n### Ground a term or artifact\\n\\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\\n\\n### Clarify until observable\\n\\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\\n\\n### Use contrastive cases\\n\\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\\n\\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\\n\\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\\n\\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\\n\\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\\n\\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\\n\\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\\n\\n### Restate for correction\\n\\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\\n\\n### Propose structure for correction\\n\\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\\n\\n### Deposit and defer\\n\\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\\n\\n### Press without trapping\\n\\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\\n\\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\\n\\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\\n\\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\\n\\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\\n\\n### Trade concrete outcomes\\n\\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\\n\\n### Close with one correction opportunity\\n\\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\\n\\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\\n\\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\\n\\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\\n\\n### Before asking\\n\\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\\n\\n### Before recording\\n\\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\\n\\n### Before closing\\n\\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-sdcpn-elicitation.md): \"# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\\n\\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\\n\\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\\n\\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\\n\\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\\n\\n### Keep target structure backstage\\n\\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\\n\\n### Preserve operational context\\n\\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\\n\\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\\n\\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\\n\\n### Language and account signals\\n\\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\\n\\n### Operational situation patterns\\n\\n#### Timed work\\n\\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\\n\\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\\n\\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\\n\\n#### Contended resource\\n\\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\\n\\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\\n\\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\\n\\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\\n\\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\\n\\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\\n\\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\\n\\n#### Mode change\\n\\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\\n\\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\\n\\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\\n\\n#### Spatial transfer\\n\\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\\n\\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\\n\\n#### Policy under pressure\\n\\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\\n\\n#### Hidden waiting\\n\\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\\n\\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\\n\\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\\n\\n### Link the slice to the objective\\n\\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\\n\\n### Expose the process spine\\n\\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\\n\\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\\n\\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\\n\\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\\n\\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\\n\\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\\n\\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\\n\\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\\n\\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\\n\\n### Close a resource account\\n\\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\\n\\n### Close a mode change in both directions\\n\\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\\n\\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\\n\\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\\n\\n### Ask what is conserved\\n\\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\\n\\n### Establish retry scope\\n\\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\\n\\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\\n\\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\\n\\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\\n\\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\\n\\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\\n\\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\\n\\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\\n\\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\\n\\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\\n\\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\\n\\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\\n\\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\\n\\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\\n\\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\\n\\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\\n\\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\\n\\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\\n\\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\\n\\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\\n\\n### Purpose and process\\n\\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\\n\\n### Operational semantics\\n\\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\\n\\n### Quantities and context\\n\\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000024", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFFVE40S1IxMlFLUjlZMEVXTVQ1RDQ3", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1ETN4MWPCM1SE4Z672MHF7F", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4MT18VH8M0251RZDDQX", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 4 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "elicitation" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n", + "durationMs": 1 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "When a request is rejected, does that immediately free the reviewer for another request, or do they remain assigned through an appeal window?", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1ETN4KSDQJW1DPE4RVS7J0C" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.842Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.845Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.868Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.874Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4MT18VH8M0251RZDDQX", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.874Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4MT18VH8M0251RZDDQX", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277854668:6zd48nwidad", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.874Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277854668:6zd48nwidad", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3102, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3102, + "totalTokens": 6215, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277854668 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4MT18VH8M0251RZDDQX", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.876Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\":\"sdc", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4MT18VH8M0251RZDDQX", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.877Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "pn-modelling\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4MT18VH8M0251RZDDQX", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.877Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4MT18VH8M0251RZDDQX", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277854668:6zd48nwidad", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3102, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3102, + "totalTokens": 6215, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.878Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277854668:6zd48nwidad", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3102, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3102, + "totalTokens": 6215, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277854668 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4MT18VH8M0251RZDDQX", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.879Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4MT18VH8M0251RZDDQX", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.881Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277854883 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4MT18VH8M0251RZDDQX", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.883Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277854883 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4MT18VH8M0251RZDDQX", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.883Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 4, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4MT18VH8M0251RZDDQX", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.884Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4MT18VH8M0251RZDDQX", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277854668:6zd48nwidad", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3102, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3102, + "totalTokens": 6215, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277854668 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277854883 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.885Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4N6XN1TBK8934Z6D9SA", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.886Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4N6XN1TBK8934Z6D9SA", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277854668:6zd48nwidad", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.886Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277854668:6zd48nwidad", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 2386, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 6337, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277854668 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4N6XN1TBK8934Z6D9SA", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.887Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\":\"eli", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4N6XN1TBK8934Z6D9SA", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.887Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "citation\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4N6XN1TBK8934Z6D9SA", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.888Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4N6XN1TBK8934Z6D9SA", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 2, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277854668:6zd48nwidad", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 2386, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 6337, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.888Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277854668:6zd48nwidad", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 2386, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 6337, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277854668 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4N6XN1TBK8934Z6D9SA", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.889Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4N6XN1TBK8934Z6D9SA", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.889Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277854890 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4N6XN1TBK8934Z6D9SA", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.890Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277854890 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4N6XN1TBK8934Z6D9SA", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.891Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + } + }, + "durationMs": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4N6XN1TBK8934Z6D9SA", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.892Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4N6XN1TBK8934Z6D9SA", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277854668:6zd48nwidad", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 2386, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 6337, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277854668 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277854890 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.892Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4ND0AWNN27N5G4QRZG6", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.893Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4ND0AWNN27N5G4QRZG6", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277854668:6zd48nwidad", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.893Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277854668:6zd48nwidad", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4348, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3641, + "cacheWrite": 4349, + "totalTokens": 12368, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277854894 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4ND0AWNN27N5G4QRZG6", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.894Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.flue/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4ND0AWNN27N5G4QRZG6", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.894Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "packaged-skills/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4ND0AWNN27N5G4QRZG6", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.894Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "skill%3Asdcpn-mo", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4ND0AWNN27N5G4QRZG6", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.895Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "delling%3Aa63c18f6ff", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4ND0AWNN27N5G4QRZG6", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.895Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "2bfa97/sdcpn", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4ND0AWNN27N5G4QRZG6", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.895Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "-elicitation.md\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4ND0AWNN27N5G4QRZG6", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.895Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4ND0AWNN27N5G4QRZG6", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277854668:6zd48nwidad", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 4348, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3641, + "cacheWrite": 4349, + "totalTokens": 12368, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.896Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277854668:6zd48nwidad", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4348, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3641, + "cacheWrite": 4349, + "totalTokens": 12368, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277854894 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4ND0AWNN27N5G4QRZG6", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.896Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4ND0AWNN27N5G4QRZG6", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.896Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277854898 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4ND0AWNN27N5G4QRZG6", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.898Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277854898 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4ND0AWNN27N5G4QRZG6", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.898Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + } + }, + "durationMs": 2, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4ND0AWNN27N5G4QRZG6", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.899Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4ND0AWNN27N5G4QRZG6", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277854668:6zd48nwidad", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4348, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3641, + "cacheWrite": 4349, + "totalTokens": 12368, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277854894 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277854898 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.900Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4NNTHN49759PGQDAD9W", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.901Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4NNTHN49759PGQDAD9W", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277854668:6zd48nwidad", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.901Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277854668:6zd48nwidad", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 36, + "cacheRead": 7274, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 17100, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277854668 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4NNTHN49759PGQDAD9W", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.902Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "When a request is re", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4NNTHN49759PGQDAD9W", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.905Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "jected, does that im", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4NNTHN49759PGQDAD9W", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.905Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "mediately free t", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4NNTHN49759PGQDAD9W", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.905Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "he reviewer for ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4NNTHN49759PGQDAD9W", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.905Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "another requ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4NNTHN49759PGQDAD9W", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.905Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "est, or do they ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4NNTHN49759PGQDAD9W", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.905Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "remain assigned thro", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4NNTHN49759PGQDAD9W", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.905Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ugh an appeal wi", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4NNTHN49759PGQDAD9W", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.905Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ndow?", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4NNTHN49759PGQDAD9W", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.905Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4NNTHN49759PGQDAD9W", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277854668:6zd48nwidad", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "When a request is rejected, does that immediately free the reviewer for another request, or do they remain assigned through an appeal window?" + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 36, + "cacheRead": 7274, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 17100, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.905Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "When a request is rejected, does that immediately free the reviewer for another request, or do they remain assigned through an appeal window?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277854668:6zd48nwidad", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 36, + "cacheRead": 7274, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 17100, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277854668 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4NNTHN49759PGQDAD9W", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.905Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN4NNTHN49759PGQDAD9W", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "When a request is rejected, does that immediately free the reviewer for another request, or do they remain assigned through an appeal window?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277854668:6zd48nwidad", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 36, + "cacheRead": 7274, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 17100, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277854668 + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 57, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.907Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277854668:6zd48nwidad", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3102, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3102, + "totalTokens": 6215, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277854668 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277854883 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277854668:6zd48nwidad", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 2386, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 6337, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277854668 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277854890 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277854668:6zd48nwidad", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4348, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3641, + "cacheWrite": 4349, + "totalTokens": 12368, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277854894 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277854898 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "When a request is rejected, does that immediately free the reviewer for another request, or do they remain assigned through an appeal window?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277854668:6zd48nwidad", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 36, + "cacheRead": 7274, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 17100, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277854668 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 58, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.907Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 40, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 59, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.908Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN4KTRYBJ51D6KQJNQVMG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN4MM6Z9GMFCDK9T3JP6S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 60, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.908Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN4KR12QKR9Y0EWMT5D47", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "2e26e4e22683cb1054764d66dc2b2cc6d4aa1ed15b55688ba9d0ebd9602ba5a9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 61, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:54.909Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "6a1bbb68da22eed1f1179aa133bb9f41a094ef9162300a14c30661f9bad2e0b7", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "b6aa515d5805ef0f7f637cd58afc350d4ae67ff9612d78f2f3f434c90519628b", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "451a12b35374721f32cd9b5aac85a29ff8c8ee66741afb1b2360bc172dbc8fe8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "c04354de75321d89c33ef98e823d670275a4d1f8dbd659bb326a833450792e41", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/scenarios.json": "10e5b6897319045485a33e556d1de05241cbdbe9ddf5e8fa6c72ef73199252c1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/protocol.md": "1ff13a4c5e30c698dd5d2ac252074597639b620b1d9cbaf4d1380fcaa3f9ca32", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md": "c16d5faaa7a450a41d6888dd6d2b3eac88e4687779b0c8f8e6fe4eceeeb241c6", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "b4959142f10c74e9b04a5d0c0dfb3b74dbab8c492a26e34d2c2c8ff9e3eb7cfa" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/hermetic/packaged-S1.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/hermetic/packaged-S1.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b78ec21cdc3 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/hermetic/packaged-S1.json @@ -0,0 +1,2970 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v2-packaged-s1-d82dbd45", + "phase": "hermetic", + "instrumentVersion": "v2", + "candidate": "packaged", + "scenarioId": "S1", + "scenario": { + "title": "Underspecified interactive request", + "prompt": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "stopAfter": "The first consequential question.", + "expected": "Ask one high-yield question in operational vocabulary after loading universal and SDCPN elicitation judgment." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [ + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "sha256": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "sha256": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf" + } + ], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 4, + "inputTokens": 2896, + "outputTokens": 11, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 2896, + "totalTokens": 5803, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3, + "inputTokens": 2007, + "outputTokens": 31, + "cacheReadTokens": 2180, + "cacheWriteTokens": 2007, + "totalTokens": 6225, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 2, + "inputTokens": 4352, + "outputTokens": 30, + "cacheReadTokens": 3471, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4352, + "totalTokens": 12205, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 5, + "inputTokens": 4895, + "outputTokens": 32, + "cacheReadTokens": 7107, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16929, + "cost": 0 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 14, + "inputTokens": 14150, + "outputTokens": 104, + "cacheReadTokens": 12758, + "cacheWriteTokens": 14150, + "totalTokens": 41162, + "cost": 0 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nHelp me model our approval process as an SDCPN.\n\n## Assistant\nWhat decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?\n- tool activate_skill (activate-sdcpn): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\\n\\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\\n\\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\\n\\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\\n\\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-universal-elicitation.md): \"# Universal Elicitation Reference\\n\\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\\n\\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Work from purpose\\n\\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\\n\\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\\n\\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\\n\\n### Follow the person's account\\n\\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\\n\\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\\n\\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\\n\\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\\n\\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\\n\\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\\n\\n### Treat divergence as information\\n\\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\\n\\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\\n\\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\\n\\n### Stop honestly\\n\\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\\n\\n### Vague or compressed language\\n\\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\\n\\n### Normative language\\n\\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\\n\\n### Tension within or between accounts\\n\\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\\n\\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\\n\\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\\n\\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\\n\\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\\n\\n### Diminishing yield\\n\\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\\n\\n### Assent without independent wording\\n\\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\\n\\n### Silence and absence\\n\\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\\n\\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\\n\\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\\n\\n### Slice a concrete case\\n\\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\\n\\n### Sweep one property\\n\\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\\n\\n### Ask for the last occurrence\\n\\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\\n\\n### Ask for the basis\\n\\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\\n\\n### Ground a term or artifact\\n\\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\\n\\n### Clarify until observable\\n\\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\\n\\n### Use contrastive cases\\n\\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\\n\\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\\n\\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\\n\\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\\n\\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\\n\\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\\n\\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\\n\\n### Restate for correction\\n\\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\\n\\n### Propose structure for correction\\n\\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\\n\\n### Deposit and defer\\n\\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\\n\\n### Press without trapping\\n\\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\\n\\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\\n\\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\\n\\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\\n\\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\\n\\n### Trade concrete outcomes\\n\\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\\n\\n### Close with one correction opportunity\\n\\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\\n\\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\\n\\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\\n\\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\\n\\n### Before asking\\n\\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\\n\\n### Before recording\\n\\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\\n\\n### Before closing\\n\\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-sdcpn-elicitation.md): \"# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\\n\\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\\n\\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\\n\\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\\n\\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\\n\\n### Keep target structure backstage\\n\\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\\n\\n### Preserve operational context\\n\\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\\n\\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\\n\\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\\n\\n### Language and account signals\\n\\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\\n\\n### Operational situation patterns\\n\\n#### Timed work\\n\\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\\n\\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\\n\\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\\n\\n#### Contended resource\\n\\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\\n\\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\\n\\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\\n\\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\\n\\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\\n\\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\\n\\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\\n\\n#### Mode change\\n\\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\\n\\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\\n\\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\\n\\n#### Spatial transfer\\n\\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\\n\\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\\n\\n#### Policy under pressure\\n\\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\\n\\n#### Hidden waiting\\n\\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\\n\\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\\n\\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\\n\\n### Link the slice to the objective\\n\\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\\n\\n### Expose the process spine\\n\\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\\n\\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\\n\\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\\n\\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\\n\\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\\n\\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\\n\\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\\n\\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\\n\\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\\n\\n### Close a resource account\\n\\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\\n\\n### Close a mode change in both directions\\n\\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\\n\\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\\n\\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\\n\\n### Ask what is conserved\\n\\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\\n\\n### Establish retry scope\\n\\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\\n\\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\\n\\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\\n\\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\\n\\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\\n\\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\\n\\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\\n\\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\\n\\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\\n\\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\\n\\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\\n\\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\\n\\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\\n\\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\\n\\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\\n\\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\\n\\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\\n\\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\\n\\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\\n\\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\\n\\n### Purpose and process\\n\\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\\n\\n### Operational semantics\\n\\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\\n\\n### Quantities and context\\n\\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000024", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFFVE41NUpCM0ZGSDZLOUNRUFhFNVNR", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1ETN56HX3C8RMJM9XXC0E3K", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN56GN0TYMGJ8N8FPW9Y7", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 3 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1ETN55KZ3Q1024ZJKHF2JGZ" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.412Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.414Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.434Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.439Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN56GN0TYMGJ8N8FPW9Y7", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.440Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN56GN0TYMGJ8N8FPW9Y7", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277855245:4kiq5n5owaw", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.440Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277855245:4kiq5n5owaw", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2896, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2896, + "totalTokens": 5803, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277855245 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN56GN0TYMGJ8N8FPW9Y7", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.442Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\":\"sdcpn-m", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN56GN0TYMGJ8N8FPW9Y7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.442Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "odelling\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN56GN0TYMGJ8N8FPW9Y7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.443Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN56GN0TYMGJ8N8FPW9Y7", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277855245:4kiq5n5owaw", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2896, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2896, + "totalTokens": 5803, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.444Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277855245:4kiq5n5owaw", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2896, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2896, + "totalTokens": 5803, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277855245 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN56GN0TYMGJ8N8FPW9Y7", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.444Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN56GN0TYMGJ8N8FPW9Y7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.446Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277855449 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN56GN0TYMGJ8N8FPW9Y7", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.449Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277855449 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN56GN0TYMGJ8N8FPW9Y7", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.449Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 3, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN56GN0TYMGJ8N8FPW9Y7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.451Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN56GN0TYMGJ8N8FPW9Y7", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277855245:4kiq5n5owaw", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2896, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2896, + "totalTokens": 5803, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277855245 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277855449 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.451Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN56WPP31Y3XE4WCDP999", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.452Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN56WPP31Y3XE4WCDP999", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277855245:4kiq5n5owaw", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.452Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277855245:4kiq5n5owaw", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 2180, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 6225, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277855453 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN56WPP31Y3XE4WCDP999", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.453Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.f", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN56WPP31Y3XE4WCDP999", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.454Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "lue/packaged", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN56WPP31Y3XE4WCDP999", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.454Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "-skills/skil", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN56WPP31Y3XE4WCDP999", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.454Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "l%3Asdcpn-modelling%", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN56WPP31Y3XE4WCDP999", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.454Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "3A895714f964", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN56WPP31Y3XE4WCDP999", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.454Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "83ea31/universal", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN56WPP31Y3XE4WCDP999", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.454Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "-elicitation.md\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN56WPP31Y3XE4WCDP999", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.454Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN56WPP31Y3XE4WCDP999", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277855245:4kiq5n5owaw", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 2180, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 6225, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.455Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277855245:4kiq5n5owaw", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 2180, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 6225, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277855453 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN56WPP31Y3XE4WCDP999", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.455Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN56WPP31Y3XE4WCDP999", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.456Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277855458 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN56WPP31Y3XE4WCDP999", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.458Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277855458 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN56WPP31Y3XE4WCDP999", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.458Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + } + }, + "durationMs": 2, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN56WPP31Y3XE4WCDP999", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.459Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN56WPP31Y3XE4WCDP999", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277855245:4kiq5n5owaw", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 2180, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 6225, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277855453 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277855458 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.459Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5741BXSDSX41XYD1KCN", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.460Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5741BXSDSX41XYD1KCN", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277855245:4kiq5n5owaw", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.460Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277855245:4kiq5n5owaw", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4352, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3471, + "cacheWrite": 4352, + "totalTokens": 12205, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277855461 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5741BXSDSX41XYD1KCN", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.461Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.f", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5741BXSDSX41XYD1KCN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.461Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "lue/packaged-ski", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5741BXSDSX41XYD1KCN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.461Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "lls/skill%3Asdcpn-mo", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5741BXSDSX41XYD1KCN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.461Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "delling%3A89", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5741BXSDSX41XYD1KCN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.462Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "5714f96483ea31/s", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5741BXSDSX41XYD1KCN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.462Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "dcpn-elicita", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5741BXSDSX41XYD1KCN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.462Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "tion.md\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5741BXSDSX41XYD1KCN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.462Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5741BXSDSX41XYD1KCN", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 2, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277855245:4kiq5n5owaw", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 4352, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3471, + "cacheWrite": 4352, + "totalTokens": 12205, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.462Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277855245:4kiq5n5owaw", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4352, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3471, + "cacheWrite": 4352, + "totalTokens": 12205, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277855461 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5741BXSDSX41XYD1KCN", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.462Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5741BXSDSX41XYD1KCN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.463Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277855465 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5741BXSDSX41XYD1KCN", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.465Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277855465 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5741BXSDSX41XYD1KCN", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.465Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + } + }, + "durationMs": 2, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5741BXSDSX41XYD1KCN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.466Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5741BXSDSX41XYD1KCN", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277855245:4kiq5n5owaw", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4352, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3471, + "cacheWrite": 4352, + "totalTokens": 12205, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277855461 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277855465 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.467Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN57CF1DKK0VWTBBZ5J03", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.468Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN57CF1DKK0VWTBBZ5J03", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277855245:4kiq5n5owaw", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.468Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277855245:4kiq5n5owaw", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 32, + "cacheRead": 7107, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16929, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277855245 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN57CF1DKK0VWTBBZ5J03", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.469Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "What decision should", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN57CF1DKK0VWTBBZ5J03", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.472Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " this model ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN57CF1DKK0VWTBBZ5J03", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.472Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "support, and can", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN57CF1DKK0VWTBBZ5J03", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.472Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " you walk me", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN57CF1DKK0VWTBBZ5J03", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.472Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " through the las", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN57CF1DKK0VWTBBZ5J03", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.472Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "t approval r", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN57CF1DKK0VWTBBZ5J03", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 57, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.472Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "equest from ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN57CF1DKK0VWTBBZ5J03", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 58, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.472Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "submission to its ou", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN57CF1DKK0VWTBBZ5J03", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 59, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.472Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "tcome?", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN57CF1DKK0VWTBBZ5J03", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 60, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.472Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN57CF1DKK0VWTBBZ5J03", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 5, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277855245:4kiq5n5owaw", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?" + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 32, + "cacheRead": 7107, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16929, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 61, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.473Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277855245:4kiq5n5owaw", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 32, + "cacheRead": 7107, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16929, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277855245 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN57CF1DKK0VWTBBZ5J03", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 62, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.473Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN57CF1DKK0VWTBBZ5J03", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277855245:4kiq5n5owaw", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 32, + "cacheRead": 7107, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16929, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277855245 + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 63, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.474Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277855245:4kiq5n5owaw", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2896, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2896, + "totalTokens": 5803, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277855245 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277855449 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277855245:4kiq5n5owaw", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 2180, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 6225, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277855453 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277855458 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277855245:4kiq5n5owaw", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4352, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3471, + "cacheWrite": 4352, + "totalTokens": 12205, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277855461 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277855465 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277855245:4kiq5n5owaw", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 32, + "cacheRead": 7107, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16929, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277855245 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 64, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.475Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 42, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 65, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.476Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN55M1VSH9E449TD13KGK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN56AW9R43EGEQHQFKB78", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 66, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.476Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN55JB3FFH6K9CQPXE5SQ", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "4e1c52276b161080463f59b6a5c08fa20d94384449f42b0e11499ecdc6d1ba9e", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 67, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.476Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "6a1bbb68da22eed1f1179aa133bb9f41a094ef9162300a14c30661f9bad2e0b7", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "b6aa515d5805ef0f7f637cd58afc350d4ae67ff9612d78f2f3f434c90519628b", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "451a12b35374721f32cd9b5aac85a29ff8c8ee66741afb1b2360bc172dbc8fe8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "c04354de75321d89c33ef98e823d670275a4d1f8dbd659bb326a833450792e41", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/scenarios.json": "10e5b6897319045485a33e556d1de05241cbdbe9ddf5e8fa6c72ef73199252c1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/protocol.md": "1ff13a4c5e30c698dd5d2ac252074597639b620b1d9cbaf4d1380fcaa3f9ca32", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md": "c16d5faaa7a450a41d6888dd6d2b3eac88e4687779b0c8f8e6fe4eceeeb241c6", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "b4959142f10c74e9b04a5d0c0dfb3b74dbab8c492a26e34d2c2c8ff9e3eb7cfa" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/hermetic/packaged-S2.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/hermetic/packaged-S2.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5a247c65811 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/hermetic/packaged-S2.json @@ -0,0 +1,2983 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v2-packaged-s2-bc5c141b", + "phase": "hermetic", + "instrumentVersion": "v2", + "candidate": "packaged", + "scenarioId": "S2", + "scenario": { + "title": "Adequate construct-only request", + "prompt": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them.", + "stopAfter": "The first consequential construction decision.", + "expected": "Enter construction guidance without loading universal elicitation or asking a question." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome.", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + }, + "output": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + }, + "output": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [ + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "sha256": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694" + }, + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md", + "sha256": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5" + } + ], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 4, + "inputTokens": 3185, + "outputTokens": 11, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 3185, + "totalTokens": 6381, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3, + "inputTokens": 2007, + "outputTokens": 29, + "cacheReadTokens": 2469, + "cacheWriteTokens": 2007, + "totalTokens": 6512, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3, + "inputTokens": 3142, + "outputTokens": 27, + "cacheReadTokens": 3760, + "cacheWriteTokens": 3142, + "totalTokens": 10071, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 4, + "inputTokens": 2000, + "outputTokens": 46, + "cacheReadTokens": 6186, + "cacheWriteTokens": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10232, + "cost": 0 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 14, + "inputTokens": 10334, + "outputTokens": 113, + "cacheReadTokens": 12415, + "cacheWriteTokens": 10334, + "totalTokens": 33196, + "cost": 0 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nUse the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them.\n\n## Assistant\nFirst, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome.\n- tool activate_skill (activate-sdcpn): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\\n\\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\\n\\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\\n\\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\\n\\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-pn-construction.md): \"# SDCPN Construction\\n\\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\\n\\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\\n\\n## Construction boundary\\n\\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\\n\\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\\n\\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\\n\\n## Mapping principles\\n\\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\\n| --- | --- |\\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\\n\\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\\n\\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\\n\\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\\n\\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\\n\\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\\n\\n## Construction patterns\\n\\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\\n\\n### Timed work\\n\\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\\n\\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\\n\\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\\n\\n### Contended resource\\n\\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\\n\\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\\n\\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\\n\\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\\n\\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\\n\\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\\n\\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\\n\\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\\n\\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\\n\\n### Mode change\\n\\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\\n\\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\\n\\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\\n\\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\\n\\n### Spatial transfer\\n\\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\\n\\n### Hidden waiting\\n\\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\\n\\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\\n\\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\\n\\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\\n\\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\\n\\nNot acceptable:\\n\\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\\n\\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\\n\\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\\n\\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\\n\\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\\n\\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-checks.md): \"# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\\n\\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\\n\\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\\n\\n## Before construction\\n\\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\\n\\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\\n\\n## During construction\\n\\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\\n\\n## Structural validity\\n\\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\\n\\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\\n\\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\\n\\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\\n\\n## Existing-net revision\\n\\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\\n\\n## Delivery\\n\\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\\n\\nState plainly:\\n\\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\\n\\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000024", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFFVE41UTNIUEJIWDQ4SkJRNTU2SjFN", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1ETN5R45K9DP5K8RSTQ9998", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5R3ZT5XS3Y26YE824Q7", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 4 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + }, + "output": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n", + "durationMs": 1 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + }, + "output": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1ETN5Q41TQNXFRW3ZJWWJBN" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.974Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.977Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:55.997Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.002Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5R3ZT5XS3Y26YE824Q7", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.003Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5R3ZT5XS3Y26YE824Q7", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277855800:e9ut2m246wh", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.003Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277855800:e9ut2m246wh", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3185, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3185, + "totalTokens": 6381, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277855800 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5R3ZT5XS3Y26YE824Q7", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.005Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\":\"sdc", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5R3ZT5XS3Y26YE824Q7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.005Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "pn-modelling\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5R3ZT5XS3Y26YE824Q7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.006Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5R3ZT5XS3Y26YE824Q7", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277855800:e9ut2m246wh", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3185, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3185, + "totalTokens": 6381, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.007Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277855800:e9ut2m246wh", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3185, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3185, + "totalTokens": 6381, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277855800 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5R3ZT5XS3Y26YE824Q7", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.007Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5R3ZT5XS3Y26YE824Q7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.010Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277856012 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5R3ZT5XS3Y26YE824Q7", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.012Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277856012 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5R3ZT5XS3Y26YE824Q7", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.012Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 4, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5R3ZT5XS3Y26YE824Q7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.013Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5R3ZT5XS3Y26YE824Q7", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277855800:e9ut2m246wh", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3185, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3185, + "totalTokens": 6381, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277855800 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277856012 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.014Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RG7ETRVAPKZ177G6P4", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.016Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RG7ETRVAPKZ177G6P4", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277855800:e9ut2m246wh", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.016Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277855800:e9ut2m246wh", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2469, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 6512, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277856016 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RG7ETRVAPKZ177G6P4", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.018Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.f", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RG7ETRVAPKZ177G6P4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.018Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "lue/packaged-ski", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RG7ETRVAPKZ177G6P4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.018Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "lls/skill%3Asdcpn-mo", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RG7ETRVAPKZ177G6P4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.018Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "delling%3A895714", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RG7ETRVAPKZ177G6P4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.018Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "f96483ea31/pn-co", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RG7ETRVAPKZ177G6P4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.018Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "nstruction.m", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RG7ETRVAPKZ177G6P4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.018Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "d\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RG7ETRVAPKZ177G6P4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.018Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RG7ETRVAPKZ177G6P4", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277855800:e9ut2m246wh", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2469, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 6512, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.019Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277855800:e9ut2m246wh", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2469, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 6512, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277856016 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RG7ETRVAPKZ177G6P4", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.019Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RG7ETRVAPKZ177G6P4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.020Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277856021 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RG7ETRVAPKZ177G6P4", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.021Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277856021 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RG7ETRVAPKZ177G6P4", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.021Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + } + }, + "durationMs": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RG7ETRVAPKZ177G6P4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.022Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RG7ETRVAPKZ177G6P4", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277855800:e9ut2m246wh", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2469, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 6512, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277856016 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277856021 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.023Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RQTAMFJJWHBK3A2PTB", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.023Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RQTAMFJJWHBK3A2PTB", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277855800:e9ut2m246wh", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.024Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277855800:e9ut2m246wh", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3760, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 10071, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277856024 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RQTAMFJJWHBK3A2PTB", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.025Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.flue/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RQTAMFJJWHBK3A2PTB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.025Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "packaged-skills/skil", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RQTAMFJJWHBK3A2PTB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.025Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "l%3Asdcpn-modell", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RQTAMFJJWHBK3A2PTB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.025Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "ing%3A895714f964", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RQTAMFJJWHBK3A2PTB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.025Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "83ea31/checks.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RQTAMFJJWHBK3A2PTB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.025Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RQTAMFJJWHBK3A2PTB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.025Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RQTAMFJJWHBK3A2PTB", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277855800:e9ut2m246wh", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3760, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 10071, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.026Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277855800:e9ut2m246wh", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3760, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 10071, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277856024 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RQTAMFJJWHBK3A2PTB", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.026Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RQTAMFJJWHBK3A2PTB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.026Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277856028 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RQTAMFJJWHBK3A2PTB", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.028Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277856028 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RQTAMFJJWHBK3A2PTB", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.028Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + } + }, + "durationMs": 2, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RQTAMFJJWHBK3A2PTB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.029Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RQTAMFJJWHBK3A2PTB", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277855800:e9ut2m246wh", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3760, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 10071, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277856024 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277856028 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.029Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RYDAF8M3ZSMCKT3688", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.030Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RYDAF8M3ZSMCKT3688", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277855800:e9ut2m246wh", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.030Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277855800:e9ut2m246wh", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 46, + "cacheRead": 6186, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10232, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277855800 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RYDAF8M3ZSMCKT3688", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.031Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "First, factor the ti", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RYDAF8M3ZSMCKT3688", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.033Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "med review into star", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RYDAF8M3ZSMCKT3688", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.033Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "t, in-progress, appr", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RYDAF8M3ZSMCKT3688", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.033Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "oval, and rejection ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RYDAF8M3ZSMCKT3688", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.033Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "transitions so the r", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RYDAF8M3ZSMCKT3688", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.033Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "eviewer token is res", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RYDAF8M3ZSMCKT3688", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.033Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "erved during the", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RYDAF8M3ZSMCKT3688", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 57, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.033Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " 20-minute c", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RYDAF8M3ZSMCKT3688", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 58, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.033Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "heck and returne", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RYDAF8M3ZSMCKT3688", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 59, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.033Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "d on either ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RYDAF8M3ZSMCKT3688", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 60, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.033Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "outcome.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RYDAF8M3ZSMCKT3688", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 61, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.033Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RYDAF8M3ZSMCKT3688", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277855800:e9ut2m246wh", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome." + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 46, + "cacheRead": 6186, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10232, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 62, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.034Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277855800:e9ut2m246wh", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 46, + "cacheRead": 6186, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10232, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277855800 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RYDAF8M3ZSMCKT3688", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 63, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.034Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN5RYDAF8M3ZSMCKT3688", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277855800:e9ut2m246wh", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 46, + "cacheRead": 6186, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10232, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277855800 + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 64, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.036Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277855800:e9ut2m246wh", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3185, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3185, + "totalTokens": 6381, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277855800 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277856012 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277855800:e9ut2m246wh", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2469, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 6512, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277856016 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277856021 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277855800:e9ut2m246wh", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3760, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 10071, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277856024 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277856028 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277855800:e9ut2m246wh", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 46, + "cacheRead": 6186, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10232, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277855800 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 65, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.036Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 39, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 66, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.037Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN5Q6J2BA48VB5FE8NVHG", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN5QXZQCSPYAATP6GWT05", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 67, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.037Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN5Q3HPBHX48JBQ556J1M", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "cbf969c1e7ac4aaa4b1ca4af44bf0fab70faea2d6306a977044cbed1ce545e2a", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 68, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.037Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "6a1bbb68da22eed1f1179aa133bb9f41a094ef9162300a14c30661f9bad2e0b7", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "b6aa515d5805ef0f7f637cd58afc350d4ae67ff9612d78f2f3f434c90519628b", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "451a12b35374721f32cd9b5aac85a29ff8c8ee66741afb1b2360bc172dbc8fe8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "c04354de75321d89c33ef98e823d670275a4d1f8dbd659bb326a833450792e41", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/scenarios.json": "10e5b6897319045485a33e556d1de05241cbdbe9ddf5e8fa6c72ef73199252c1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/protocol.md": "1ff13a4c5e30c698dd5d2ac252074597639b620b1d9cbaf4d1380fcaa3f9ca32", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md": "c16d5faaa7a450a41d6888dd6d2b3eac88e4687779b0c8f8e6fe4eceeeb241c6", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "b4959142f10c74e9b04a5d0c0dfb3b74dbab8c492a26e34d2c2c8ff9e3eb7cfa" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/hermetic/packaged-S3.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/hermetic/packaged-S3.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..163149fe74b --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/hermetic/packaged-S3.json @@ -0,0 +1,2966 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v2-packaged-s3-28a83a4b", + "phase": "hermetic", + "instrumentVersion": "v2", + "candidate": "packaged", + "scenarioId": "S3", + "scenario": { + "title": "Review with a resolvable target defect", + "prompt": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token.", + "stopAfter": "The first supported defect finding.", + "expected": "Identify the missing reviewer return on rejection without loading universal elicitation." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer.", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + }, + "output": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + }, + "output": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [ + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "sha256": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694" + }, + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md", + "sha256": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5" + } + ], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 7, + "inputTokens": 3057, + "outputTokens": 11, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 3057, + "totalTokens": 6125, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 4, + "inputTokens": 2007, + "outputTokens": 29, + "cacheReadTokens": 2342, + "cacheWriteTokens": 2007, + "totalTokens": 6385, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 4, + "inputTokens": 3142, + "outputTokens": 27, + "cacheReadTokens": 3633, + "cacheWriteTokens": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9944, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 6, + "inputTokens": 2000, + "outputTokens": 45, + "cacheReadTokens": 6059, + "cacheWriteTokens": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10104, + "cost": 0 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 21, + "inputTokens": 10206, + "outputTokens": 112, + "cacheReadTokens": 12034, + "cacheWriteTokens": 10206, + "totalTokens": 32558, + "cost": 0 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nReview the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token.\n\n## Assistant\nThe rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer.\n- tool activate_skill (activate-sdcpn): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\\n\\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\\n\\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\\n\\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\\n\\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-pn-construction.md): \"# SDCPN Construction\\n\\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\\n\\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\\n\\n## Construction boundary\\n\\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\\n\\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\\n\\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\\n\\n## Mapping principles\\n\\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\\n| --- | --- |\\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\\n\\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\\n\\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\\n\\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\\n\\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\\n\\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\\n\\n## Construction patterns\\n\\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\\n\\n### Timed work\\n\\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\\n\\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\\n\\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\\n\\n### Contended resource\\n\\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\\n\\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\\n\\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\\n\\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\\n\\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\\n\\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\\n\\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\\n\\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\\n\\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\\n\\n### Mode change\\n\\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\\n\\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\\n\\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\\n\\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\\n\\n### Spatial transfer\\n\\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\\n\\n### Hidden waiting\\n\\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\\n\\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\\n\\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\\n\\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\\n\\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\\n\\nNot acceptable:\\n\\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\\n\\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\\n\\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\\n\\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\\n\\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\\n\\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-checks.md): \"# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\\n\\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\\n\\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\\n\\n## Before construction\\n\\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\\n\\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\\n\\n## During construction\\n\\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\\n\\n## Structural validity\\n\\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\\n\\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\\n\\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\\n\\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\\n\\n## Existing-net revision\\n\\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\\n\\n## Delivery\\n\\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\\n\\nState plainly:\\n\\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\\n\\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000024", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFFVE42ODNKMDYyNjRCUzU3QkZSVFda", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1ETN694NZJMAKKTPGTBQCG9", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN693JAX36MG9ZZV74A4X", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 4 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + }, + "output": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + }, + "output": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n", + "durationMs": 1 + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1ETN683C5A63MQA234ANV5H" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.517Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.520Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.541Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.546Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN693JAX36MG9ZZV74A4X", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.547Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN693JAX36MG9ZZV74A4X", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277856348:129r5de82u2i", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.547Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277856348:129r5de82u2i", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3057, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3057, + "totalTokens": 6125, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277856348 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN693JAX36MG9ZZV74A4X", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.549Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\":\"sdcpn-model", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN693JAX36MG9ZZV74A4X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.550Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "ling\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN693JAX36MG9ZZV74A4X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.553Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN693JAX36MG9ZZV74A4X", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 7, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277856348:129r5de82u2i", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3057, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3057, + "totalTokens": 6125, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.554Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277856348:129r5de82u2i", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3057, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3057, + "totalTokens": 6125, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277856348 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN693JAX36MG9ZZV74A4X", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.554Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN693JAX36MG9ZZV74A4X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.556Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277856559 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN693JAX36MG9ZZV74A4X", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.559Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277856559 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN693JAX36MG9ZZV74A4X", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.559Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 4, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN693JAX36MG9ZZV74A4X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.561Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN693JAX36MG9ZZV74A4X", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277856348:129r5de82u2i", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3057, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3057, + "totalTokens": 6125, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277856348 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277856559 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.561Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN69JCHCT79KB84N9P1ZW", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.562Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN69JCHCT79KB84N9P1ZW", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277856348:129r5de82u2i", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.562Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277856348:129r5de82u2i", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2342, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 6385, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277856563 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN69JCHCT79KB84N9P1ZW", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.564Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.flue/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN69JCHCT79KB84N9P1ZW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.564Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "packaged-skills/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN69JCHCT79KB84N9P1ZW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.565Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "skill%3Asdcp", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN69JCHCT79KB84N9P1ZW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.565Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "n-modelling%3A895714", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN69JCHCT79KB84N9P1ZW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.565Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "f96483ea31/p", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN69JCHCT79KB84N9P1ZW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.565Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "n-construction.m", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN69JCHCT79KB84N9P1ZW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.565Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "d\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN69JCHCT79KB84N9P1ZW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.565Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN69JCHCT79KB84N9P1ZW", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277856348:129r5de82u2i", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2342, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 6385, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.566Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277856348:129r5de82u2i", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2342, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 6385, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277856563 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN69JCHCT79KB84N9P1ZW", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.566Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN69JCHCT79KB84N9P1ZW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.567Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277856568 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN69JCHCT79KB84N9P1ZW", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.568Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277856568 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN69JCHCT79KB84N9P1ZW", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.568Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + } + }, + "durationMs": 2, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN69JCHCT79KB84N9P1ZW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.569Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN69JCHCT79KB84N9P1ZW", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277856348:129r5de82u2i", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2342, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 6385, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277856563 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277856568 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.569Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN69T8772STYYWQF29H3Q", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.570Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN69T8772STYYWQF29H3Q", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277856348:129r5de82u2i", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.570Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277856348:129r5de82u2i", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3633, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9944, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277856571 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN69T8772STYYWQF29H3Q", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.572Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.f", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN69T8772STYYWQF29H3Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.572Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "lue/packaged-skills/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN69T8772STYYWQF29H3Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.572Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "skill%3Asdcpn-modell", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN69T8772STYYWQF29H3Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.572Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "ing%3A895714f96483ea", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN69T8772STYYWQF29H3Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.572Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "31/checks.md\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN69T8772STYYWQF29H3Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.572Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN69T8772STYYWQF29H3Q", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277856348:129r5de82u2i", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3633, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9944, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.574Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277856348:129r5de82u2i", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3633, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9944, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277856571 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN69T8772STYYWQF29H3Q", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.574Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN69T8772STYYWQF29H3Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.574Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277856575 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN69T8772STYYWQF29H3Q", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.575Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277856575 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN69T8772STYYWQF29H3Q", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.575Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + } + }, + "durationMs": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN69T8772STYYWQF29H3Q", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.576Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN69T8772STYYWQF29H3Q", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277856348:129r5de82u2i", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3633, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9944, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277856571 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277856575 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.577Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6A286R5V06343PXPG26", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.578Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6A286R5V06343PXPG26", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277856348:129r5de82u2i", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.578Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277856348:129r5de82u2i", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 45, + "cacheRead": 6059, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10104, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277856348 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6A286R5V06343PXPG26", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.579Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "The rejection pa", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6A286R5V06343PXPG26", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.583Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "th leaks the reusabl", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6A286R5V06343PXPG26", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.583Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "e reviewer token: th", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6A286R5V06343PXPG26", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.583Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "e account requires r", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6A286R5V06343PXPG26", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.583Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "elease after eit", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6A286R5V06343PXPG26", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.583Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "her outcome, but", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6A286R5V06343PXPG26", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.583Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " RecordRejec", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6A286R5V06343PXPG26", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.583Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "tion has no outp", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6A286R5V06343PXPG26", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 57, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.583Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ut arc returning it ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6A286R5V06343PXPG26", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 58, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.583Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "to AvailableReviewer", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6A286R5V06343PXPG26", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 59, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.583Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": ".", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6A286R5V06343PXPG26", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 60, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.583Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6A286R5V06343PXPG26", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 6, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277856348:129r5de82u2i", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer." + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 45, + "cacheRead": 6059, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10104, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 61, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.584Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277856348:129r5de82u2i", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 45, + "cacheRead": 6059, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10104, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277856348 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6A286R5V06343PXPG26", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 62, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.584Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6A286R5V06343PXPG26", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277856348:129r5de82u2i", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 45, + "cacheRead": 6059, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10104, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277856348 + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 63, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.585Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277856348:129r5de82u2i", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3057, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3057, + "totalTokens": 6125, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277856348 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277856559 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277856348:129r5de82u2i", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 2342, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 6385, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277856563 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277856568 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277856348:129r5de82u2i", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 3633, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9944, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277856571 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277856575 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277856348:129r5de82u2i", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 45, + "cacheRead": 6059, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 10104, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277856348 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 64, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.586Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 45, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 65, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.586Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN685TDAS4X5JKHN4B7MS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN68XJ4ZZDV7JQHG1HFHD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 66, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.586Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN683J06264BS57BFRTWZ", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "c28064dd2d00986ab967ab83cc711836108f3521844b60d6d621445bda75debf", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 67, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:56.587Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "6a1bbb68da22eed1f1179aa133bb9f41a094ef9162300a14c30661f9bad2e0b7", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "b6aa515d5805ef0f7f637cd58afc350d4ae67ff9612d78f2f3f434c90519628b", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "451a12b35374721f32cd9b5aac85a29ff8c8ee66741afb1b2360bc172dbc8fe8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "c04354de75321d89c33ef98e823d670275a4d1f8dbd659bb326a833450792e41", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/scenarios.json": "10e5b6897319045485a33e556d1de05241cbdbe9ddf5e8fa6c72ef73199252c1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/protocol.md": "1ff13a4c5e30c698dd5d2ac252074597639b620b1d9cbaf4d1380fcaa3f9ca32", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md": "c16d5faaa7a450a41d6888dd6d2b3eac88e4687779b0c8f8e6fe4eceeeb241c6", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "b4959142f10c74e9b04a5d0c0dfb3b74dbab8c492a26e34d2c2c8ff9e3eb7cfa" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/hermetic/packaged-S4.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/hermetic/packaged-S4.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d05e13139ee --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/hermetic/packaged-S4.json @@ -0,0 +1,2968 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v2-packaged-s4-581f4b9e", + "phase": "hermetic", + "instrumentVersion": "v2", + "candidate": "packaged", + "scenarioId": "S4", + "scenario": { + "title": "Review exposing a human-knowledge gap", + "prompt": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately.", + "stopAfter": "One focused question about the unresolved release distinction.", + "expected": "Load universal elicitation and ask whether rejection releases the reviewer or retains assignment through appeal." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "When a request is rejected, does that immediately free the reviewer for another request, or do they remain assigned through an appeal window?", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [ + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "sha256": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "sha256": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf" + } + ], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 4, + "inputTokens": 3034, + "outputTokens": 11, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 3034, + "totalTokens": 6079, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3, + "inputTokens": 2007, + "outputTokens": 31, + "cacheReadTokens": 2319, + "cacheWriteTokens": 2007, + "totalTokens": 6364, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3, + "inputTokens": 4351, + "outputTokens": 30, + "cacheReadTokens": 3610, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4352, + "totalTokens": 12343, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 5, + "inputTokens": 4895, + "outputTokens": 36, + "cacheReadTokens": 7246, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4895, + "totalTokens": 17072, + "cost": 0 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 15, + "inputTokens": 14287, + "outputTokens": 108, + "cacheReadTokens": 13175, + "cacheWriteTokens": 14288, + "totalTokens": 41858, + "cost": 0 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nReview the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately.\n\n## Assistant\nWhen a request is rejected, does that immediately free the reviewer for another request, or do they remain assigned through an appeal window?\n- tool activate_skill (activate-sdcpn): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\\n\\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\\n\\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\\n\\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\\n\\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-universal-elicitation.md): \"# Universal Elicitation Reference\\n\\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\\n\\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Work from purpose\\n\\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\\n\\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\\n\\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\\n\\n### Follow the person's account\\n\\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\\n\\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\\n\\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\\n\\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\\n\\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\\n\\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\\n\\n### Treat divergence as information\\n\\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\\n\\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\\n\\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\\n\\n### Stop honestly\\n\\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\\n\\n### Vague or compressed language\\n\\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\\n\\n### Normative language\\n\\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\\n\\n### Tension within or between accounts\\n\\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\\n\\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\\n\\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\\n\\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\\n\\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\\n\\n### Diminishing yield\\n\\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\\n\\n### Assent without independent wording\\n\\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\\n\\n### Silence and absence\\n\\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\\n\\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\\n\\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\\n\\n### Slice a concrete case\\n\\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\\n\\n### Sweep one property\\n\\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\\n\\n### Ask for the last occurrence\\n\\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\\n\\n### Ask for the basis\\n\\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\\n\\n### Ground a term or artifact\\n\\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\\n\\n### Clarify until observable\\n\\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\\n\\n### Use contrastive cases\\n\\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\\n\\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\\n\\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\\n\\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\\n\\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\\n\\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\\n\\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\\n\\n### Restate for correction\\n\\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\\n\\n### Propose structure for correction\\n\\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\\n\\n### Deposit and defer\\n\\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\\n\\n### Press without trapping\\n\\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\\n\\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\\n\\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\\n\\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\\n\\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\\n\\n### Trade concrete outcomes\\n\\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\\n\\n### Close with one correction opportunity\\n\\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\\n\\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\\n\\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\\n\\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\\n\\n### Before asking\\n\\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\\n\\n### Before recording\\n\\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\\n\\n### Before closing\\n\\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-sdcpn-elicitation.md): \"# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\\n\\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\\n\\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\\n\\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\\n\\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\\n\\n### Keep target structure backstage\\n\\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\\n\\n### Preserve operational context\\n\\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\\n\\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\\n\\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\\n\\n### Language and account signals\\n\\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\\n\\n### Operational situation patterns\\n\\n#### Timed work\\n\\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\\n\\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\\n\\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\\n\\n#### Contended resource\\n\\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\\n\\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\\n\\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\\n\\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\\n\\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\\n\\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\\n\\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\\n\\n#### Mode change\\n\\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\\n\\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\\n\\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\\n\\n#### Spatial transfer\\n\\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\\n\\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\\n\\n#### Policy under pressure\\n\\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\\n\\n#### Hidden waiting\\n\\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\\n\\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\\n\\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\\n\\n### Link the slice to the objective\\n\\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\\n\\n### Expose the process spine\\n\\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\\n\\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\\n\\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\\n\\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\\n\\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\\n\\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\\n\\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\\n\\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\\n\\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\\n\\n### Close a resource account\\n\\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\\n\\n### Close a mode change in both directions\\n\\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\\n\\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\\n\\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\\n\\n### Ask what is conserved\\n\\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\\n\\n### Establish retry scope\\n\\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\\n\\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\\n\\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\\n\\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\\n\\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\\n\\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\\n\\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\\n\\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\\n\\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\\n\\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\\n\\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\\n\\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\\n\\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\\n\\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\\n\\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\\n\\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\\n\\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\\n\\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\\n\\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\\n\\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\\n\\n### Purpose and process\\n\\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\\n\\n### Operational semantics\\n\\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\\n\\n### Quantities and context\\n\\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000024", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFFVE42VEZSQkpXM1laQTE3TUU3NlZQ", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1ETN6VGY9NCB8AMZAPDBQ4A", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6VEV9XBHA1YWBCW2NPP", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 5 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "When a request is rejected, does that immediately free the reviewer for another request, or do they remain assigned through an appeal window?", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1ETN6TG7NW7M43PH7HM8BPM" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.105Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.108Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.129Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.134Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6VEV9XBHA1YWBCW2NPP", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.134Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6VEV9XBHA1YWBCW2NPP", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277856932:xot6sib3iql", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.134Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277856932:xot6sib3iql", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3034, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3034, + "totalTokens": 6079, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277856932 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6VEV9XBHA1YWBCW2NPP", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.136Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\":\"sdcpn-m", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6VEV9XBHA1YWBCW2NPP", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.137Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "odelling\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6VEV9XBHA1YWBCW2NPP", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.137Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6VEV9XBHA1YWBCW2NPP", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277856932:xot6sib3iql", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3034, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3034, + "totalTokens": 6079, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.138Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277856932:xot6sib3iql", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3034, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3034, + "totalTokens": 6079, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277856932 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6VEV9XBHA1YWBCW2NPP", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.138Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6VEV9XBHA1YWBCW2NPP", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.141Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277857144 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6VEV9XBHA1YWBCW2NPP", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.144Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277857144 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6VEV9XBHA1YWBCW2NPP", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.144Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 5, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6VEV9XBHA1YWBCW2NPP", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.145Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6VEV9XBHA1YWBCW2NPP", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277856932:xot6sib3iql", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3034, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3034, + "totalTokens": 6079, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277856932 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277857144 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.145Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6VT30853W9HRVT0S09S", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.146Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6VT30853W9HRVT0S09S", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277856932:xot6sib3iql", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.146Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277856932:xot6sib3iql", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 2319, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 6364, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277857147 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6VT30853W9HRVT0S09S", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.148Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.flue/pack", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6VT30853W9HRVT0S09S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.148Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "aged-skills/skil", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6VT30853W9HRVT0S09S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.148Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "l%3Asdcpn-modell", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6VT30853W9HRVT0S09S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.148Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "ing%3A895714f964", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6VT30853W9HRVT0S09S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.148Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "83ea31/unive", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6VT30853W9HRVT0S09S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.148Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "rsal-elicitation.md\"", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6VT30853W9HRVT0S09S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.148Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6VT30853W9HRVT0S09S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.148Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6VT30853W9HRVT0S09S", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277856932:xot6sib3iql", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 2319, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 6364, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.149Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277856932:xot6sib3iql", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 2319, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 6364, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277857147 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6VT30853W9HRVT0S09S", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.149Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6VT30853W9HRVT0S09S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.150Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277857151 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6VT30853W9HRVT0S09S", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.151Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277857151 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6VT30853W9HRVT0S09S", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.151Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + } + }, + "durationMs": 2, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6VT30853W9HRVT0S09S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.152Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6VT30853W9HRVT0S09S", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277856932:xot6sib3iql", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 2319, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 6364, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277857147 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277857151 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.153Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6W23F1K10RM3GVRNT07", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.154Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6W23F1K10RM3GVRNT07", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277856932:xot6sib3iql", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.154Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277856932:xot6sib3iql", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4351, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3610, + "cacheWrite": 4352, + "totalTokens": 12343, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277857155 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6W23F1K10RM3GVRNT07", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.156Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.flue/pack", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6W23F1K10RM3GVRNT07", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.156Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "aged-skills/skil", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6W23F1K10RM3GVRNT07", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.156Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "l%3Asdcpn-modell", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6W23F1K10RM3GVRNT07", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.156Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "ing%3A895714f964", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6W23F1K10RM3GVRNT07", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.156Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "83ea31/sdcpn-eli", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6W23F1K10RM3GVRNT07", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.156Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "citation.md\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6W23F1K10RM3GVRNT07", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.156Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6W23F1K10RM3GVRNT07", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277856932:xot6sib3iql", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 4351, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3610, + "cacheWrite": 4352, + "totalTokens": 12343, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.157Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277856932:xot6sib3iql", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4351, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3610, + "cacheWrite": 4352, + "totalTokens": 12343, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277857155 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6W23F1K10RM3GVRNT07", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.157Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6W23F1K10RM3GVRNT07", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.157Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277857159 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6W23F1K10RM3GVRNT07", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.159Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277857159 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6W23F1K10RM3GVRNT07", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.159Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + } + }, + "durationMs": 2, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6W23F1K10RM3GVRNT07", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.160Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6W23F1K10RM3GVRNT07", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277856932:xot6sib3iql", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4351, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3610, + "cacheWrite": 4352, + "totalTokens": 12343, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277857155 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277857159 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.161Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6WAKJSYRMTMAPS7XVRV", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.162Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6WAKJSYRMTMAPS7XVRV", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277856932:xot6sib3iql", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.162Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788277856932:xot6sib3iql", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 36, + "cacheRead": 7246, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 17072, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277856932 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6WAKJSYRMTMAPS7XVRV", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.163Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "When a reque", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6WAKJSYRMTMAPS7XVRV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.166Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "st is rejected, ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6WAKJSYRMTMAPS7XVRV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.166Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "does that immedi", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6WAKJSYRMTMAPS7XVRV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.166Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ately free t", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6WAKJSYRMTMAPS7XVRV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.166Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "he reviewer for ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6WAKJSYRMTMAPS7XVRV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.166Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "another request, or ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6WAKJSYRMTMAPS7XVRV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.166Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "do they remain assig", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6WAKJSYRMTMAPS7XVRV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 57, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.166Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ned through ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6WAKJSYRMTMAPS7XVRV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 58, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.166Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "an appeal window", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6WAKJSYRMTMAPS7XVRV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 59, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.166Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "?", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6WAKJSYRMTMAPS7XVRV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 60, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.166Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6WAKJSYRMTMAPS7XVRV", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 5, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788277856932:xot6sib3iql", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "When a request is rejected, does that immediately free the reviewer for another request, or do they remain assigned through an appeal window?" + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 36, + "cacheRead": 7246, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 17072, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 61, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.167Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "When a request is rejected, does that immediately free the reviewer for another request, or do they remain assigned through an appeal window?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277856932:xot6sib3iql", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 36, + "cacheRead": 7246, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 17072, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277856932 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6WAKJSYRMTMAPS7XVRV", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 62, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.167Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETN6WAKJSYRMTMAPS7XVRV", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "When a request is rejected, does that immediately free the reviewer for another request, or do they remain assigned through an appeal window?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277856932:xot6sib3iql", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 36, + "cacheRead": 7246, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 17072, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277856932 + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 63, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.168Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277856932:xot6sib3iql", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3034, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 3034, + "totalTokens": 6079, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277856932 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277857144 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277856932:xot6sib3iql", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 2319, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 6364, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277857147 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277857151 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277856932:xot6sib3iql", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4351, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 3610, + "cacheWrite": 4352, + "totalTokens": 12343, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277857155 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277857159 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "When a request is rejected, does that immediately free the reviewer for another request, or do they remain assigned through an appeal window?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788277856932:xot6sib3iql", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 36, + "cacheRead": 7246, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 17072, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277856932 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 64, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.169Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 40, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 65, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.169Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETN6THA17WDB96BZ135ZF3", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETN6V9MY28XHJPAV6VHFW8", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 66, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.169Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETN6TFRBJW3YZA17ME76VP", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "1d5d523a4a8ccff8a403a9feb16920ce714bf9fdb5ae09cfb1330c55d4adca2c", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 67, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:50:57.170Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "6a1bbb68da22eed1f1179aa133bb9f41a094ef9162300a14c30661f9bad2e0b7", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "b6aa515d5805ef0f7f637cd58afc350d4ae67ff9612d78f2f3f434c90519628b", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "451a12b35374721f32cd9b5aac85a29ff8c8ee66741afb1b2360bc172dbc8fe8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "c04354de75321d89c33ef98e823d670275a4d1f8dbd659bb326a833450792e41", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/scenarios.json": "10e5b6897319045485a33e556d1de05241cbdbe9ddf5e8fa6c72ef73199252c1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/protocol.md": "1ff13a4c5e30c698dd5d2ac252074597639b620b1d9cbaf4d1380fcaa3f9ca32", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md": "c16d5faaa7a450a41d6888dd6d2b3eac88e4687779b0c8f8e6fe4eceeeb241c6", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "b4959142f10c74e9b04a5d0c0dfb3b74dbab8c492a26e34d2c2c8ff9e3eb7cfa" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/paid/independent-S1-r1.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/paid/independent-S1-r1.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..40fcdb51b3b --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/paid/independent-S1-r1.json @@ -0,0 +1,1734 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v2-independent-s1-d7467f64", + "phase": "paid", + "instrumentVersion": "v2", + "candidate": "independent", + "scenarioId": "S1", + "scenario": { + "title": "Underspecified interactive request", + "prompt": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "stopAfter": "The first consequential question.", + "expected": "Ask one high-yield question in operational vocabulary after loading universal and SDCPN elicitation judgment." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "Good—I'll help you model your approval process as an SDCPN. Let me start by understanding what you're trying to accomplish and how you work.\n\n**Orientation questions:**\n\n1. **What is the scope of the approval process you want to model?** (For example: requests for a specific kind of thing—purchases, hires, budget changes, design reviews—or an entire organizational approval chain?)\n\n2. **What do you want to do with this model once we have it?** For instance:\n - Understand the current flow and spot bottlenecks?\n - Simulate how changes would affect turnaround time?\n - Document it for new team members?\n - Something else?\n\n3. **How much time do you have available for this conversation?** Are you looking to sketch it out quickly, or do a thorough walkthrough?\n\n4. **What's your expected audience?** (Process owners, stakeholders who need to follow it, analysts, etc.)\n\nThese answers will help me focus on what matters most for your objectives.", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling", "elicitation"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "toolu_01USarmZtz5SwqC18zUEiVwa", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 2375, + "inputTokens": 3494, + "outputTokens": 205, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 3699, + "cost": 0.004519 + }, + { + "durationMs": 4141, + "inputTokens": 12, + "outputTokens": 322, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4828, + "totalTokens": 5162, + "cost": 0.007657000000000001 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 6516, + "inputTokens": 3506, + "outputTokens": 527, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4828, + "totalTokens": 8861, + "cost": 0.012176 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nHelp me model our approval process as an SDCPN.\n\n## Assistant\nGood—I'll help you model your approval process as an SDCPN. Let me start by understanding what you're trying to accomplish and how you work.\n\n**Orientation questions:**\n\n1. **What is the scope of the approval process you want to model?** (For example: requests for a specific kind of thing—purchases, hires, budget changes, design reviews—or an entire organizational approval chain?)\n\n2. **What do you want to do with this model once we have it?** For instance:\n - Understand the current flow and spot bottlenecks?\n - Simulate how changes would affect turnaround time?\n - Document it for new team members?\n - Something else?\n\n3. **How much time do you have available for this conversation?** Are you looking to sketch it out quickly, or do a thorough walkthrough?\n\n4. **What's your expected audience?** (Process owners, stakeholders who need to follow it, analysts, etc.)\n\nThese answers will help me focus on what matters most for your objectives.\n- tool activate_skill (toolu_01USarmZtz5SwqC18zUEiVwa): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\\n\\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\\n\\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\\n\\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\\n\\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000024", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFFVE5ON0NLTjdTRlEyNDlSQkIzQVNB", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1ETNP2JSVH18RW47ZQA31ED", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNN8K2V8QTAR2KF01C90G", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The user wants to model their approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic and Data-Colored Petri Net). This is a process modeling task for the Petrinaut editor.\n\nAccording to the instructions, I should:\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model\n2. Follow the elicitation procedure: establish domain context and objectives, calibrate to the user's appetite, then conduct the interview through \"slices\" and \"sweeps\"\n\nLet me start by activating the skill to get the full instructions for SDCPN modeling.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01USarmZtz5SwqC18zUEiVwa", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 3 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good, the skill is now activated. Now I need to start the orientation phase to understand:\n1. The user's domain context and objectives\n2. The intended audience, boundary, and horizon\n3. Accuracy needs\n4. Available time\n\nThis will help me calibrate the elicitation appropriately. Let me start by asking about their approval process and their objectives in modeling it.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good—I'll help you model your approval process as an SDCPN. Let me start by understanding what you're trying to accomplish and how you work.\n\n**Orientation questions:**\n\n1. **What is the scope of the approval process you want to model?** (For example: requests for a specific kind of thing—purchases, hires, budget changes, design reviews—or an entire organizational approval chain?)\n\n2. **What do you want to do with this model once we have it?** For instance:\n - Understand the current flow and spot bottlenecks?\n - Simulate how changes would affect turnaround time?\n - Document it for new team members?\n - Something else?\n\n3. **How much time do you have available for this conversation?** Are you looking to sketch it out quickly, or do a thorough walkthrough?\n\n4. **What's your expected audience?** (Process owners, stakeholders who need to follow it, analysts, etc.)\n\nThese answers will help me focus on what matters most for your objectives.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1ETNN7H44QCHE6D3VTGTJKJ" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:11.859Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:11.862Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:11.886Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:11.891Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNN8K2V8QTAR2KF01C90G", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:11.891Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNN8K2V8QTAR2KF01C90G", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:11.892Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277871903 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNN8K2V8QTAR2KF01C90G", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:12.723Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNN8K2V8QTAR2KF01C90G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:12.725Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "The user wants to", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNN8K2V8QTAR2KF01C90G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:13.728Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " model their approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic and Data-Colored Petri Net). This is a process modeling task for the Petrinaut editor.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNN8K2V8QTAR2KF01C90G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:13.728Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "\n\nAccording to the instructions, I should:\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model\n2. Follow the elicitation procedure: establish domain", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNN8K2V8QTAR2KF01C90G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:13.728Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " context and objectives, calibrate to the user's appetite, then conduct the interview through", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNN8K2V8QTAR2KF01C90G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:13.728Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " \"slices\" and \"sweeps\"\n\nLet me start by activating the skill to get the full instructions for SDCPN modeling.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNN8K2V8QTAR2KF01C90G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:14.232Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "The user wants to model their approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic and Data-Colored Petri Net). This is a process modeling task for the Petrinaut editor.\n\nAccording to the instructions, I should:\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model\n2. Follow the elicitation procedure: establish domain context and objectives, calibrate to the user's appetite, then conduct the interview through \"slices\" and \"sweeps\"\n\nLet me start by activating the skill to get the full instructions for SDCPN modeling.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNN8K2V8QTAR2KF01C90G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:14.232Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01USarmZtz5SwqC18zUEiVwa", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNN8K2V8QTAR2KF01C90G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:14.237Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01USarmZtz5SwqC18zUEiVwa", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\": \"sdcpn-modelling", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNN8K2V8QTAR2KF01C90G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:14.240Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01USarmZtz5SwqC18zUEiVwa", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNN8K2V8QTAR2KF01C90G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:14.242Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNN8K2V8QTAR2KF01C90G", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 2375, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Cecz9hTyTbYhxkkn1UMGB", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model their approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic and Data-Colored Petri Net). This is a process modeling task for the Petrinaut editor.\n\nAccording to the instructions, I should:\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model\n2. Follow the elicitation procedure: establish domain context and objectives, calibrate to the user's appetite, then conduct the interview through \"slices\" and \"sweeps\"\n\nLet me start by activating the skill to get the full instructions for SDCPN modeling.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01USarmZtz5SwqC18zUEiVwa", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3494, + "output": 205, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3699, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0034939999999999997, + "output": 0.001025, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.004519 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:14.267Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model their approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic and Data-Colored Petri Net). This is a process modeling task for the Petrinaut editor.\n\nAccording to the instructions, I should:\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model\n2. Follow the elicitation procedure: establish domain context and objectives, calibrate to the user's appetite, then conduct the interview through \"slices\" and \"sweeps\"\n\nLet me start by activating the skill to get the full instructions for SDCPN modeling.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01USarmZtz5SwqC18zUEiVwa", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3494, + "output": 205, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3699, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0034939999999999997, + "output": 0.001025, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.004519 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 143 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277871903, + "responseId": "msg_011Cecz9hTyTbYhxkkn1UMGB", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNN8K2V8QTAR2KF01C90G", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:14.267Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01USarmZtz5SwqC18zUEiVwa", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNN8K2V8QTAR2KF01C90G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:14.269Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01USarmZtz5SwqC18zUEiVwa", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277874272 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNN8K2V8QTAR2KF01C90G", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:14.272Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01USarmZtz5SwqC18zUEiVwa", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277874272 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNN8K2V8QTAR2KF01C90G", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:14.272Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01USarmZtz5SwqC18zUEiVwa", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 3, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNN8K2V8QTAR2KF01C90G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:14.272Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNN8K2V8QTAR2KF01C90G", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model their approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic and Data-Colored Petri Net). This is a process modeling task for the Petrinaut editor.\n\nAccording to the instructions, I should:\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model\n2. Follow the elicitation procedure: establish domain context and objectives, calibrate to the user's appetite, then conduct the interview through \"slices\" and \"sweeps\"\n\nLet me start by activating the skill to get the full instructions for SDCPN modeling.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01USarmZtz5SwqC18zUEiVwa", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3494, + "output": 205, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3699, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0034939999999999997, + "output": 0.001025, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.004519 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 143 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277871903, + "responseId": "msg_011Cecz9hTyTbYhxkkn1UMGB", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01USarmZtz5SwqC18zUEiVwa", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277874272 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:14.273Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNQK1A2DR57GGAQBAQ6XH", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:14.274Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNQK1A2DR57GGAQBAQ6XH", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model their approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic and Data-Colored Petri Net). This is a process modeling task for the Petrinaut editor.\n\nAccording to the instructions, I should:\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model\n2. Follow the elicitation procedure: establish domain context and objectives, calibrate to the user's appetite, then conduct the interview through \"slices\" and \"sweeps\"\n\nLet me start by activating the skill to get the full instructions for SDCPN modeling.", + "thinkingSignature": "EqEGCpoBCBEYAipAY3d8AQwkxJzmLzI0w2EZFR2jubiPmMoDsAkWdDVLYrVi4IAquNo91pA77bj5LfYWKAHf6X0J3mQQzH/l8l2iNzIZY2xhdWRlLWhhaWt1LTQtNS0yMDI1MTAwMTgAQgh0aGlua2luZ1okMWNiODRmYzQtNDdhYS00ZTFmLWE2NjUtOTQwYWI5ZjgxZjg4qAHy6NvUBhIMQFsism+fpPekFeaYGgzXIFGX5XRyAhmS4RYiMErGYsVV+LLsBdKyZHpxumMK0CVSAMyfx9PrVG0MsxdqkKGBPaeWIUyyOcgG45Xe2iqzBClxRNigGmmrEZlwuFwjkoj+C5T/jAIjUpm8qbH0PG31iDNJBKv9RVXvyZ9qdDYLYXz5cDQ6YTcc9vmEFd2kpSnfbKMU/FrfS7RSdVKKPSVgJ5M/fn/YpuHnrRmqe0ex306IfThF7DoETeFtggLPruC9tLE9DD3j3dh817ijtKGi0l+bLM2DhFvX7Y/T4xXGesj8opNe1DXT2wv18OmAXYgamxheSufZveaFignXXgZnZgZx4rZencc6zG9FG6wHypbb4U8ZyfEg6qC4faTU72x9vGJf1o3PWWxuasWYPbZh7q1kCp2qV6QhXLtYd6CWTrQ3oI7oRNpM1VCEI7uVpHS48bvnvROhEvK2uOBRQU/H3zyQRx9gDrIEn1A5Bo73iGTjnFSbhHjVEQ101nXm3xi6ZXCjz5YCmRO/fDMQm6Jun0gPFOdRHhZfUcr6PqFeG8sCv5wf20eGS0/ihRjIuvRLjvbhFdAmb29pWlhUJ/g+KMUjfiOnVlHLUJC5v9/flN/SNEdebPjjTejaF8wRQ90zD4vUpHJGjUA3FxNrRnGvQ0vuJPsVXbrmBvXYTgSwQK4PePI3wHkFQ1zTzycfJgb0Mpye/rya1V0BwiDHYjfQYs+dtT14S9mXecW+6R9/oT5zN6L+GPL3eCxHLe/G4Pfcu2zvEDQo+3L5pfYIlw+06GYGbP7X9C0WDUTdOZbBCeXHdiADIUmFwbMJdL4HtubJZwxpn8hzt0Dukky+FvjXerV5GAE=" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01USarmZtz5SwqC18zUEiVwa", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01USarmZtz5SwqC18zUEiVwa", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:14.274Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277874275 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNQK1A2DR57GGAQBAQ6XH", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:14.889Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNQK1A2DR57GGAQBAQ6XH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:14.890Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "Good", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNQK1A2DR57GGAQBAQ6XH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:15.897Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ", the skill is now activated. Now I need to start the orientation phase to understand:\n1. The user's", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNQK1A2DR57GGAQBAQ6XH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:15.897Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " domain context and objectives\n2. The intended audience, boundary, and horizon\n3. Accuracy needs\n4. Available time\n\nThis", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNQK1A2DR57GGAQBAQ6XH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:15.897Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " will help me calibrate the elicitation appropriately. Let me start by asking about their approval process and their objectives in modeling", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNQK1A2DR57GGAQBAQ6XH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:15.897Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " it.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNQK1A2DR57GGAQBAQ6XH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:16.148Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "Good, the skill is now activated. Now I need to start the orientation phase to understand:\n1. The user's domain context and objectives\n2. The intended audience, boundary, and horizon\n3. Accuracy needs\n4. Available time\n\nThis will help me calibrate the elicitation appropriately. Let me start by asking about their approval process and their objectives in modeling it.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNQK1A2DR57GGAQBAQ6XH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:16.149Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "Good—I'll help you model your approval process as an", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNQK1A2DR57GGAQBAQ6XH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:17.153Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " SDCPN. Let me start by understanding what you're trying to accomplish and how you work.\n\n**Orientation questions:**\n\n1. **What is the scope of the", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNQK1A2DR57GGAQBAQ6XH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:17.153Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " approval process you want to model?** (For example: requests for a specific kind of thing—purchases, hires, budget", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNQK1A2DR57GGAQBAQ6XH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:17.153Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " changes, design reviews—or an entire organizational approval chain?)\n\n2. **What do you want to do with this model", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNQK1A2DR57GGAQBAQ6XH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:18.264Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " once we have it?** For instance:\n - Understand the current flow and spot bottlenecks?\n - Simulate how changes would affect tur", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNQK1A2DR57GGAQBAQ6XH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:18.264Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "naround time?\n - Document it for new team members?\n - Something else?\n\n3. **How much time do you have available for this conversation", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNQK1A2DR57GGAQBAQ6XH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:18.264Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "?** Are you looking to sketch it out quickly, or do a thorough walkthrough?\n\n4. **What's your expected audience?", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNQK1A2DR57GGAQBAQ6XH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:18.264Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "** (Process owners, stakeholders who need to follow it, analysts, etc.)\n\nThese answers will help me focus on what matters most for your objectives", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNQK1A2DR57GGAQBAQ6XH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:18.402Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": ".", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNQK1A2DR57GGAQBAQ6XH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:18.402Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNQK1A2DR57GGAQBAQ6XH", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4141, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Cecz9rs2MaAhTaStNi2HW", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is now activated. Now I need to start the orientation phase to understand:\n1. The user's domain context and objectives\n2. The intended audience, boundary, and horizon\n3. Accuracy needs\n4. Available time\n\nThis will help me calibrate the elicitation appropriately. Let me start by asking about their approval process and their objectives in modeling it.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good—I'll help you model your approval process as an SDCPN. Let me start by understanding what you're trying to accomplish and how you work.\n\n**Orientation questions:**\n\n1. **What is the scope of the approval process you want to model?** (For example: requests for a specific kind of thing—purchases, hires, budget changes, design reviews—or an entire organizational approval chain?)\n\n2. **What do you want to do with this model once we have it?** For instance:\n - Understand the current flow and spot bottlenecks?\n - Simulate how changes would affect turnaround time?\n - Document it for new team members?\n - Something else?\n\n3. **How much time do you have available for this conversation?** Are you looking to sketch it out quickly, or do a thorough walkthrough?\n\n4. **What's your expected audience?** (Process owners, stakeholders who need to follow it, analysts, etc.)\n\nThese answers will help me focus on what matters most for your objectives." + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 322, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4828, + "totalTokens": 5162, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.00161, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.006035, + "total": 0.007657000000000001 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:18.415Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is now activated. Now I need to start the orientation phase to understand:\n1. The user's domain context and objectives\n2. The intended audience, boundary, and horizon\n3. Accuracy needs\n4. Available time\n\nThis will help me calibrate the elicitation appropriately. Let me start by asking about their approval process and their objectives in modeling it.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good—I'll help you model your approval process as an SDCPN. Let me start by understanding what you're trying to accomplish and how you work.\n\n**Orientation questions:**\n\n1. **What is the scope of the approval process you want to model?** (For example: requests for a specific kind of thing—purchases, hires, budget changes, design reviews—or an entire organizational approval chain?)\n\n2. **What do you want to do with this model once we have it?** For instance:\n - Understand the current flow and spot bottlenecks?\n - Simulate how changes would affect turnaround time?\n - Document it for new team members?\n - Something else?\n\n3. **How much time do you have available for this conversation?** Are you looking to sketch it out quickly, or do a thorough walkthrough?\n\n4. **What's your expected audience?** (Process owners, stakeholders who need to follow it, analysts, etc.)\n\nThese answers will help me focus on what matters most for your objectives." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 322, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4828, + "totalTokens": 5162, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.00161, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.006035, + "total": 0.007657000000000001 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 86 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277874275, + "responseId": "msg_011Cecz9rs2MaAhTaStNi2HW", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNQK1A2DR57GGAQBAQ6XH", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:18.415Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETNQK1A2DR57GGAQBAQ6XH", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is now activated. Now I need to start the orientation phase to understand:\n1. The user's domain context and objectives\n2. The intended audience, boundary, and horizon\n3. Accuracy needs\n4. Available time\n\nThis will help me calibrate the elicitation appropriately. Let me start by asking about their approval process and their objectives in modeling it.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good—I'll help you model your approval process as an SDCPN. Let me start by understanding what you're trying to accomplish and how you work.\n\n**Orientation questions:**\n\n1. **What is the scope of the approval process you want to model?** (For example: requests for a specific kind of thing—purchases, hires, budget changes, design reviews—or an entire organizational approval chain?)\n\n2. **What do you want to do with this model once we have it?** For instance:\n - Understand the current flow and spot bottlenecks?\n - Simulate how changes would affect turnaround time?\n - Document it for new team members?\n - Something else?\n\n3. **How much time do you have available for this conversation?** Are you looking to sketch it out quickly, or do a thorough walkthrough?\n\n4. **What's your expected audience?** (Process owners, stakeholders who need to follow it, analysts, etc.)\n\nThese answers will help me focus on what matters most for your objectives." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 322, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4828, + "totalTokens": 5162, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.00161, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.006035, + "total": 0.007657000000000001 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 86 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277874275, + "responseId": "msg_011Cecz9rs2MaAhTaStNi2HW", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:18.415Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model their approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic and Data-Colored Petri Net). This is a process modeling task for the Petrinaut editor.\n\nAccording to the instructions, I should:\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model\n2. Follow the elicitation procedure: establish domain context and objectives, calibrate to the user's appetite, then conduct the interview through \"slices\" and \"sweeps\"\n\nLet me start by activating the skill to get the full instructions for SDCPN modeling.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01USarmZtz5SwqC18zUEiVwa", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3494, + "output": 205, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3699, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0034939999999999997, + "output": 0.001025, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.004519 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 143 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277871903, + "responseId": "msg_011Cecz9hTyTbYhxkkn1UMGB", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01USarmZtz5SwqC18zUEiVwa", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277874272 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is now activated. Now I need to start the orientation phase to understand:\n1. The user's domain context and objectives\n2. The intended audience, boundary, and horizon\n3. Accuracy needs\n4. Available time\n\nThis will help me calibrate the elicitation appropriately. Let me start by asking about their approval process and their objectives in modeling it.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good—I'll help you model your approval process as an SDCPN. Let me start by understanding what you're trying to accomplish and how you work.\n\n**Orientation questions:**\n\n1. **What is the scope of the approval process you want to model?** (For example: requests for a specific kind of thing—purchases, hires, budget changes, design reviews—or an entire organizational approval chain?)\n\n2. **What do you want to do with this model once we have it?** For instance:\n - Understand the current flow and spot bottlenecks?\n - Simulate how changes would affect turnaround time?\n - Document it for new team members?\n - Something else?\n\n3. **How much time do you have available for this conversation?** Are you looking to sketch it out quickly, or do a thorough walkthrough?\n\n4. **What's your expected audience?** (Process owners, stakeholders who need to follow it, analysts, etc.)\n\nThese answers will help me focus on what matters most for your objectives." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 322, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4828, + "totalTokens": 5162, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.00161, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.006035, + "total": 0.007657000000000001 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 86 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277874275, + "responseId": "msg_011Cecz9rs2MaAhTaStNi2HW", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:18.416Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 6530, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:18.416Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETNN7KJ8J6K669DVVG06NA", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETNN8ETA1WGSV79HVDZ2FY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:18.416Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETNN7CKN7SFQ249RBB3ASA", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "298cbdbba8b056a39ca5326b06f6b46cfe8e8ea659e2066bfa9f545edcf639f4", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:18.417Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "6a1bbb68da22eed1f1179aa133bb9f41a094ef9162300a14c30661f9bad2e0b7", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "b6aa515d5805ef0f7f637cd58afc350d4ae67ff9612d78f2f3f434c90519628b", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "451a12b35374721f32cd9b5aac85a29ff8c8ee66741afb1b2360bc172dbc8fe8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "c04354de75321d89c33ef98e823d670275a4d1f8dbd659bb326a833450792e41", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/scenarios.json": "10e5b6897319045485a33e556d1de05241cbdbe9ddf5e8fa6c72ef73199252c1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/protocol.md": "1ff13a4c5e30c698dd5d2ac252074597639b620b1d9cbaf4d1380fcaa3f9ca32", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md": "c16d5faaa7a450a41d6888dd6d2b3eac88e4687779b0c8f8e6fe4eceeeb241c6", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "b4959142f10c74e9b04a5d0c0dfb3b74dbab8c492a26e34d2c2c8ff9e3eb7cfa" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/paid/independent-S4-r1.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/paid/independent-S4-r1.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..99d97c0f2ea --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/paid/independent-S4-r1.json @@ -0,0 +1,956 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v2-independent-s4-912525fb", + "phase": "paid", + "instrumentVersion": "v2", + "candidate": "independent", + "scenarioId": "S4", + "scenario": { + "title": "Review exposing a human-knowledge gap", + "prompt": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately.", + "stopAfter": "One focused question about the unresolved release distinction.", + "expected": "Load universal elicitation and ask whether rejection releases the reviewer or retains assignment through appeal." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "**First consequential action:**\n\nThe target specifies that `RecordRejection` immediately returns the reserved reviewer token. This is a **design choice not present in the operational account**, which explicitly leaves this open: \"The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\"\n\n**Before proceeding:** You need to confirm with the domain expert whether immediate release on rejection is the intended behavior, or whether rejections should keep the reviewer assigned (e.g., to handle appeals). This is not something to infer from the existing account.", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling", "elicitation"], + "activatedSkills": [], + "toolCalls": [], + "readOutputs": [], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 5179, + "inputTokens": 3597, + "outputTokens": 406, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 4003, + "cost": 0.005627 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 5179, + "inputTokens": 3597, + "outputTokens": 406, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 4003, + "cost": 0.005627 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nReview the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately.\n\n## Assistant\n**First consequential action:**\n\nThe target specifies that `RecordRejection` immediately returns the reserved reviewer token. This is a **design choice not present in the operational account**, which explicitly leaves this open: \"The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\"\n\n**Before proceeding:** You need to confirm with the domain expert whether immediate release on rejection is the intended behavior, or whether rejections should keep the reviewer assigned (e.g., to handle appeals). This is not something to infer from the existing account.", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPJFY8GKM7K3V4FGA9NMY", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000015", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFFVFBKRlczRjZNSFRONDVXV0s1UjVW", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1ETPK6XV96D7P1YV78E4KCN", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPJH6WTTSRKECEJ03T56C", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The user is asking me to:\n1. Review a described target against a supplied operational account\n2. Stop after the first consequential action\n3. Not invent an operational rule or mutate a net\n\nLet me parse what I have:\n\n**Operational account (from the system):**\n- A reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked\n- If approved: recording approval releases the reviewer\n- The account deliberately does NOT specify what happens on rejection (immediately released or kept assigned during appeal window)\n\n**Target description:**\n- StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\n- RecordApproval returns it\n- RecordRejection currently returns it immediately\n\n**The comparison:**\nThe target describes a specific implementation choice for rejection: RecordRejection returns the reviewer token immediately. However, the operational account explicitly states \"The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\"\n\nThis is a **consequential action**: The target has made a decision (immediate release on rejection) that was left open/unspecified in the operational account. This is a gap between what was elicited and what is being implemented.\n\nThis is where I should stop and identify this as the first consequential discrepancy.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "**First consequential action:**\n\nThe target specifies that `RecordRejection` immediately returns the reserved reviewer token. This is a **design choice not present in the operational account**, which explicitly leaves this open: \"The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\"\n\n**Before proceeding:** You need to confirm with the domain expert whether immediate release on rejection is the intended behavior, or whether rejections should keep the reviewer assigned (e.g., to handle appeals). This is not something to infer from the existing account.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1ETPJFX0SA8NYV0JV87JHAT" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "4d06edfd8d2dc72b3abac53c5ab3f7acf27b8feafe6a66885b28dd12e883cd55", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:41.822Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "4d06edfd8d2dc72b3abac53c5ab3f7acf27b8feafe6a66885b28dd12e883cd55", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:41.825Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPJGSWDEF1815RSKTRA4G", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPJFY8GKM7K3V4FGA9NMY", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4d06edfd8d2dc72b3abac53c5ab3f7acf27b8feafe6a66885b28dd12e883cd55", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:41.849Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPJFY8GKM7K3V4FGA9NMY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPJGSWDEF1815RSKTRA4G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4d06edfd8d2dc72b3abac53c5ab3f7acf27b8feafe6a66885b28dd12e883cd55", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:41.862Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPJH6WTTSRKECEJ03T56C", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPJFY8GKM7K3V4FGA9NMY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPJGSWDEF1815RSKTRA4G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4d06edfd8d2dc72b3abac53c5ab3f7acf27b8feafe6a66885b28dd12e883cd55", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:41.862Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPJH6WTTSRKECEJ03T56C", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPJFY8GKM7K3V4FGA9NMY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPJGSWDEF1815RSKTRA4G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4d06edfd8d2dc72b3abac53c5ab3f7acf27b8feafe6a66885b28dd12e883cd55", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:41.862Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277901873 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPJH6WTTSRKECEJ03T56C", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPJFY8GKM7K3V4FGA9NMY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPJGSWDEF1815RSKTRA4G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4d06edfd8d2dc72b3abac53c5ab3f7acf27b8feafe6a66885b28dd12e883cd55", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:42.558Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPJFY8GKM7K3V4FGA9NMY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPJGSWDEF1815RSKTRA4G", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPJH6WTTSRKECEJ03T56C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4d06edfd8d2dc72b3abac53c5ab3f7acf27b8feafe6a66885b28dd12e883cd55", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:42.560Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "The", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPJFY8GKM7K3V4FGA9NMY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPJGSWDEF1815RSKTRA4G", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPJH6WTTSRKECEJ03T56C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4d06edfd8d2dc72b3abac53c5ab3f7acf27b8feafe6a66885b28dd12e883cd55", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:43.563Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " user is asking me to:\n1. Review a described target against a supplied operational account\n2. Stop after the first consequential action\n3. Not invent an operational rule or mutate", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPJFY8GKM7K3V4FGA9NMY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPJGSWDEF1815RSKTRA4G", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPJH6WTTSRKECEJ03T56C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4d06edfd8d2dc72b3abac53c5ab3f7acf27b8feafe6a66885b28dd12e883cd55", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:43.563Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " a net\n\nLet me parse what I have:\n\n**Operational account (from the system):**\n- A reviewer is reserved while a request is being", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPJFY8GKM7K3V4FGA9NMY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPJGSWDEF1815RSKTRA4G", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPJH6WTTSRKECEJ03T56C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4d06edfd8d2dc72b3abac53c5ab3f7acf27b8feafe6a66885b28dd12e883cd55", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:43.563Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " checked\n- If approved: recording approval releases the reviewer\n- The account deliberately does NOT specify what happens on rejection (", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPJFY8GKM7K3V4FGA9NMY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPJGSWDEF1815RSKTRA4G", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPJH6WTTSRKECEJ03T56C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4d06edfd8d2dc72b3abac53c5ab3f7acf27b8feafe6a66885b28dd12e883cd55", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:43.563Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "immediately released or kept assigned during appeal window)\n\n**Target description:**\n- StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\n- RecordApproval returns it\n- Rec", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPJFY8GKM7K3V4FGA9NMY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPJGSWDEF1815RSKTRA4G", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPJH6WTTSRKECEJ03T56C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4d06edfd8d2dc72b3abac53c5ab3f7acf27b8feafe6a66885b28dd12e883cd55", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:44.854Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "ordRejection currently returns it immediately\n\n**The comparison:**\nThe target describes a specific implementation choice for", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPJFY8GKM7K3V4FGA9NMY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPJGSWDEF1815RSKTRA4G", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPJH6WTTSRKECEJ03T56C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4d06edfd8d2dc72b3abac53c5ab3f7acf27b8feafe6a66885b28dd12e883cd55", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:44.854Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " rejection: RecordRejection returns the reviewer token immediately. However, the operational account explicitly states \"The account does not", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPJFY8GKM7K3V4FGA9NMY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPJGSWDEF1815RSKTRA4G", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPJH6WTTSRKECEJ03T56C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4d06edfd8d2dc72b3abac53c5ab3f7acf27b8feafe6a66885b28dd12e883cd55", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:44.854Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\"\n\nThis is a **consequential action**: The target has made", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPJFY8GKM7K3V4FGA9NMY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPJGSWDEF1815RSKTRA4G", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPJH6WTTSRKECEJ03T56C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4d06edfd8d2dc72b3abac53c5ab3f7acf27b8feafe6a66885b28dd12e883cd55", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:44.854Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " a decision (immediate release on rejection) that was left open/unspecified in the operational account.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPJFY8GKM7K3V4FGA9NMY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPJGSWDEF1815RSKTRA4G", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPJH6WTTSRKECEJ03T56C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4d06edfd8d2dc72b3abac53c5ab3f7acf27b8feafe6a66885b28dd12e883cd55", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:45.836Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " This is a gap between what was elicited and what is being implemented.\n\nThis is where I should stop and identify", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPJFY8GKM7K3V4FGA9NMY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPJGSWDEF1815RSKTRA4G", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPJH6WTTSRKECEJ03T56C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4d06edfd8d2dc72b3abac53c5ab3f7acf27b8feafe6a66885b28dd12e883cd55", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:45.836Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " this as the first consequential discrepancy.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPJFY8GKM7K3V4FGA9NMY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPJGSWDEF1815RSKTRA4G", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPJH6WTTSRKECEJ03T56C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4d06edfd8d2dc72b3abac53c5ab3f7acf27b8feafe6a66885b28dd12e883cd55", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:45.836Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "The user is asking me to:\n1. Review a described target against a supplied operational account\n2. Stop after the first consequential action\n3. Not invent an operational rule or mutate a net\n\nLet me parse what I have:\n\n**Operational account (from the system):**\n- A reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked\n- If approved: recording approval releases the reviewer\n- The account deliberately does NOT specify what happens on rejection (immediately released or kept assigned during appeal window)\n\n**Target description:**\n- StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\n- RecordApproval returns it\n- RecordRejection currently returns it immediately\n\n**The comparison:**\nThe target describes a specific implementation choice for rejection: RecordRejection returns the reviewer token immediately. However, the operational account explicitly states \"The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\"\n\nThis is a **consequential action**: The target has made a decision (immediate release on rejection) that was left open/unspecified in the operational account. This is a gap between what was elicited and what is being implemented.\n\nThis is where I should stop and identify this as the first consequential discrepancy.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPJFY8GKM7K3V4FGA9NMY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPJGSWDEF1815RSKTRA4G", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPJH6WTTSRKECEJ03T56C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4d06edfd8d2dc72b3abac53c5ab3f7acf27b8feafe6a66885b28dd12e883cd55", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:45.836Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "**First consequential action:**\n\nThe target specifies that `RecordRejection` immediately", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPJFY8GKM7K3V4FGA9NMY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPJGSWDEF1815RSKTRA4G", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPJH6WTTSRKECEJ03T56C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4d06edfd8d2dc72b3abac53c5ab3f7acf27b8feafe6a66885b28dd12e883cd55", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:46.840Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " returns the reserved reviewer token. This is a **design choice not present in the operational account**, which explicitly leaves this open:", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPJFY8GKM7K3V4FGA9NMY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPJGSWDEF1815RSKTRA4G", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPJH6WTTSRKECEJ03T56C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4d06edfd8d2dc72b3abac53c5ab3f7acf27b8feafe6a66885b28dd12e883cd55", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:46.840Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " \"The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\"\n\n**Before proceeding:** You need to confirm", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPJFY8GKM7K3V4FGA9NMY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPJGSWDEF1815RSKTRA4G", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPJH6WTTSRKECEJ03T56C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4d06edfd8d2dc72b3abac53c5ab3f7acf27b8feafe6a66885b28dd12e883cd55", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:46.840Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " with the domain expert whether immediate release on rejection is the intended behavior, or whether rejections should keep the reviewer assigned (e", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPJFY8GKM7K3V4FGA9NMY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPJGSWDEF1815RSKTRA4G", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPJH6WTTSRKECEJ03T56C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4d06edfd8d2dc72b3abac53c5ab3f7acf27b8feafe6a66885b28dd12e883cd55", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:46.840Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": ".g., to handle appeals). This is not something to infer from the existing account.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPJFY8GKM7K3V4FGA9NMY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPJGSWDEF1815RSKTRA4G", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPJH6WTTSRKECEJ03T56C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4d06edfd8d2dc72b3abac53c5ab3f7acf27b8feafe6a66885b28dd12e883cd55", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:47.012Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPJH6WTTSRKECEJ03T56C", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 5179, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011CeczBu5n1z8EyQmeU3gbD", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to:\n1. Review a described target against a supplied operational account\n2. Stop after the first consequential action\n3. Not invent an operational rule or mutate a net\n\nLet me parse what I have:\n\n**Operational account (from the system):**\n- A reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked\n- If approved: recording approval releases the reviewer\n- The account deliberately does NOT specify what happens on rejection (immediately released or kept assigned during appeal window)\n\n**Target description:**\n- StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\n- RecordApproval returns it\n- RecordRejection currently returns it immediately\n\n**The comparison:**\nThe target describes a specific implementation choice for rejection: RecordRejection returns the reviewer token immediately. However, the operational account explicitly states \"The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\"\n\nThis is a **consequential action**: The target has made a decision (immediate release on rejection) that was left open/unspecified in the operational account. This is a gap between what was elicited and what is being implemented.\n\nThis is where I should stop and identify this as the first consequential discrepancy.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "**First consequential action:**\n\nThe target specifies that `RecordRejection` immediately returns the reserved reviewer token. This is a **design choice not present in the operational account**, which explicitly leaves this open: \"The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\"\n\n**Before proceeding:** You need to confirm with the domain expert whether immediate release on rejection is the intended behavior, or whether rejections should keep the reviewer assigned (e.g., to handle appeals). This is not something to infer from the existing account." + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3597, + "output": 406, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 4003, + "cost": { + "input": 0.003597, + "output": 0.00203, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005627 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPJFY8GKM7K3V4FGA9NMY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPJGSWDEF1815RSKTRA4G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4d06edfd8d2dc72b3abac53c5ab3f7acf27b8feafe6a66885b28dd12e883cd55", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:47.041Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to:\n1. Review a described target against a supplied operational account\n2. Stop after the first consequential action\n3. Not invent an operational rule or mutate a net\n\nLet me parse what I have:\n\n**Operational account (from the system):**\n- A reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked\n- If approved: recording approval releases the reviewer\n- The account deliberately does NOT specify what happens on rejection (immediately released or kept assigned during appeal window)\n\n**Target description:**\n- StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\n- RecordApproval returns it\n- RecordRejection currently returns it immediately\n\n**The comparison:**\nThe target describes a specific implementation choice for rejection: RecordRejection returns the reviewer token immediately. However, the operational account explicitly states \"The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\"\n\nThis is a **consequential action**: The target has made a decision (immediate release on rejection) that was left open/unspecified in the operational account. This is a gap between what was elicited and what is being implemented.\n\nThis is where I should stop and identify this as the first consequential discrepancy.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "**First consequential action:**\n\nThe target specifies that `RecordRejection` immediately returns the reserved reviewer token. This is a **design choice not present in the operational account**, which explicitly leaves this open: \"The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\"\n\n**Before proceeding:** You need to confirm with the domain expert whether immediate release on rejection is the intended behavior, or whether rejections should keep the reviewer assigned (e.g., to handle appeals). This is not something to infer from the existing account." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3597, + "output": 406, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 4003, + "cost": { + "input": 0.003597, + "output": 0.00203, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005627 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 277 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277901873, + "responseId": "msg_011CeczBu5n1z8EyQmeU3gbD", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPJH6WTTSRKECEJ03T56C", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPJFY8GKM7K3V4FGA9NMY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPJGSWDEF1815RSKTRA4G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4d06edfd8d2dc72b3abac53c5ab3f7acf27b8feafe6a66885b28dd12e883cd55", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:47.041Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPJH6WTTSRKECEJ03T56C", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to:\n1. Review a described target against a supplied operational account\n2. Stop after the first consequential action\n3. Not invent an operational rule or mutate a net\n\nLet me parse what I have:\n\n**Operational account (from the system):**\n- A reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked\n- If approved: recording approval releases the reviewer\n- The account deliberately does NOT specify what happens on rejection (immediately released or kept assigned during appeal window)\n\n**Target description:**\n- StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\n- RecordApproval returns it\n- RecordRejection currently returns it immediately\n\n**The comparison:**\nThe target describes a specific implementation choice for rejection: RecordRejection returns the reviewer token immediately. However, the operational account explicitly states \"The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\"\n\nThis is a **consequential action**: The target has made a decision (immediate release on rejection) that was left open/unspecified in the operational account. This is a gap between what was elicited and what is being implemented.\n\nThis is where I should stop and identify this as the first consequential discrepancy.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "**First consequential action:**\n\nThe target specifies that `RecordRejection` immediately returns the reserved reviewer token. This is a **design choice not present in the operational account**, which explicitly leaves this open: \"The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\"\n\n**Before proceeding:** You need to confirm with the domain expert whether immediate release on rejection is the intended behavior, or whether rejections should keep the reviewer assigned (e.g., to handle appeals). This is not something to infer from the existing account." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3597, + "output": 406, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 4003, + "cost": { + "input": 0.003597, + "output": 0.00203, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005627 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 277 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277901873, + "responseId": "msg_011CeczBu5n1z8EyQmeU3gbD", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPJFY8GKM7K3V4FGA9NMY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPJGSWDEF1815RSKTRA4G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4d06edfd8d2dc72b3abac53c5ab3f7acf27b8feafe6a66885b28dd12e883cd55", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:47.041Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to:\n1. Review a described target against a supplied operational account\n2. Stop after the first consequential action\n3. Not invent an operational rule or mutate a net\n\nLet me parse what I have:\n\n**Operational account (from the system):**\n- A reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked\n- If approved: recording approval releases the reviewer\n- The account deliberately does NOT specify what happens on rejection (immediately released or kept assigned during appeal window)\n\n**Target description:**\n- StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\n- RecordApproval returns it\n- RecordRejection currently returns it immediately\n\n**The comparison:**\nThe target describes a specific implementation choice for rejection: RecordRejection returns the reviewer token immediately. However, the operational account explicitly states \"The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\"\n\nThis is a **consequential action**: The target has made a decision (immediate release on rejection) that was left open/unspecified in the operational account. This is a gap between what was elicited and what is being implemented.\n\nThis is where I should stop and identify this as the first consequential discrepancy.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "**First consequential action:**\n\nThe target specifies that `RecordRejection` immediately returns the reserved reviewer token. This is a **design choice not present in the operational account**, which explicitly leaves this open: \"The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\"\n\n**Before proceeding:** You need to confirm with the domain expert whether immediate release on rejection is the intended behavior, or whether rejections should keep the reviewer assigned (e.g., to handle appeals). This is not something to infer from the existing account." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3597, + "output": 406, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 4003, + "cost": { + "input": 0.003597, + "output": 0.00203, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005627 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 277 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277901873, + "responseId": "msg_011CeczBu5n1z8EyQmeU3gbD", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPJFY8GKM7K3V4FGA9NMY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPJGSWDEF1815RSKTRA4G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4d06edfd8d2dc72b3abac53c5ab3f7acf27b8feafe6a66885b28dd12e883cd55", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:47.042Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPJGSWDEF1815RSKTRA4G", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 5193, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPJFY8GKM7K3V4FGA9NMY", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4d06edfd8d2dc72b3abac53c5ab3f7acf27b8feafe6a66885b28dd12e883cd55", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:47.042Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPJFY8GKM7K3V4FGA9NMY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPJGSWDEF1815RSKTRA4G", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "4d06edfd8d2dc72b3abac53c5ab3f7acf27b8feafe6a66885b28dd12e883cd55", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:47.042Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPJFW3F6MHTN45WWK5R5V", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "4d06edfd8d2dc72b3abac53c5ab3f7acf27b8feafe6a66885b28dd12e883cd55", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:47.043Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "6a1bbb68da22eed1f1179aa133bb9f41a094ef9162300a14c30661f9bad2e0b7", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "b6aa515d5805ef0f7f637cd58afc350d4ae67ff9612d78f2f3f434c90519628b", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "451a12b35374721f32cd9b5aac85a29ff8c8ee66741afb1b2360bc172dbc8fe8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "c04354de75321d89c33ef98e823d670275a4d1f8dbd659bb326a833450792e41", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/scenarios.json": "10e5b6897319045485a33e556d1de05241cbdbe9ddf5e8fa6c72ef73199252c1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/protocol.md": "1ff13a4c5e30c698dd5d2ac252074597639b620b1d9cbaf4d1380fcaa3f9ca32", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md": "c16d5faaa7a450a41d6888dd6d2b3eac88e4687779b0c8f8e6fe4eceeeb241c6", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "b4959142f10c74e9b04a5d0c0dfb3b74dbab8c492a26e34d2c2c8ff9e3eb7cfa" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/paid/packaged-S1-r1.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/paid/packaged-S1-r1.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..dd97a374d02 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/paid/packaged-S1-r1.json @@ -0,0 +1,3336 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v2-packaged-s1-648815af", + "phase": "paid", + "instrumentVersion": "v2", + "candidate": "packaged", + "scenarioId": "S1", + "scenario": { + "title": "Underspecified interactive request", + "prompt": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "stopAfter": "The first consequential question.", + "expected": "Ask one high-yield question in operational vocabulary after loading universal and SDCPN elicitation judgment." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "Good—I've loaded the guidance. Now I'll help you model your approval process. Let me start by understanding what you need this model to help you do.\n\n**To orient the interview:** I need to understand a few things about your goal so I can ask the right questions at the right depth.\n\n1. **What do you want to accomplish with this model?** For example, are you trying to reduce approval time, understand where bottlenecks occur, compare alternative approval strategies, or something else?\n\n2. **What counts as your approval process boundary?** Does it start when someone submits a request, or earlier? Does it end when an approval is issued, or do you need to track what happens after?\n\nOnce I understand your objective and scope, I'll walk you through one concrete approval case end-to-end, then ask about how that case varies across your operation.", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "toolu_01V1PFoi9QQkPmfBYgd1p2sE", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "toolu_01Hy5BP132ZkvvcLjLqYLg2D", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DovAiyCi2Z3sF5dRD6uimf", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "toolu_0145U6uLi245SMBHeXQ5SKJZ", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md" + }, + "output": "# Process-Model Workpiece and Recording Contract\n\nThe workpiece is the shared, recoverable operational account. Elicitation and revision maintain it; construction consumes it. The transcript remains evidence, not the primary model.\n\nFollow the person's thread during conversation and file material into the workpiece afterward. Its headings are recording homes, not question order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose, while keeping consequential omissions visible.\n\n## Recording distinctions\n\nUse these distinctions wherever they carry information; they are not mandatory labels on every sentence:\n\n- **Expert evidence** — What the person said, preserving consequential vocabulary, hedges, context, and source regime.\n- **Working account** — The current normalized operational description accepted for use.\n- **Agent inference** — An interpretation of evidence, visibly attributed to the agent.\n- **Assumed** — A value or structure proposed by the agent, with its reason, consequence, and route to checking.\n- **Unknown** — Asked, but the person does not know.\n- **Not yet asked** — Relevant and identified, but not yet addressed.\n- **Deferred** — Left for later, with why it matters and a named source or route to an answer.\n- **Declined** — The person chose not to answer or include it.\n- **Conflict** — Accounts cannot yet be used together; preserve both and what could distinguish them.\n- **Correction** — A current account that replaces an earlier one, retaining enough history to explain the change without leaving both active.\n- **Contextual coexistence** — Different accounts apply under different people, times, modes, directions, policies, or operating conditions.\n- **Omitted** — Deliberately outside the model, with why the purpose permits the omission.\n- **Target loss** — Supported operational meaning the SDCPN or current tools cannot faithfully carry.\n\nEvidence and precision are independent. “About three hours” may be supported but coarse; an exact agent-supplied value may be precise-looking but unsupported.\n\nKeep one authoritative home for each active claim. Do not accumulate competing summaries. When a later statement differs, establish whether it is a correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before updating the working account.\n\n## Workpiece template\n\n```markdown\n# Process-Model Workpiece\n\n## Purpose and posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\n\n### Who will use it and how\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n\n### Available time and assumption appetite\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; record its ordering in the process spine.\n\n### Case and process spine\n\nGive the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary: what admits the case, what flows, which activities occur and in what order, what changes the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the work and resources, and what outcome or handoff ends it.\n\n#### Primary case: \n\n##### Trigger or admission\n\n##### Ordered account and references\n\n##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes\n\n##### Objective dependencies\n\n#### Additional or contrasting case: \n\nAdd only when a different case exposes consequential structure the primary case does not.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\n### Validation evidence and data sources\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\nKeep evidence beside affected process material where practical. Use this section for evidence spanning several parts of the account or whose relationship needs explanation.\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\n### Normalized account\n\n### Agent inferences and proposed structure\n\n## Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nFor each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked.\n\n### Unknown to the person\n\n### Not yet asked\n\n### Declined\n\n### Deferred and deposits\n\nFor each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it.\n\n### Ambiguities and conflicts\n\nPreserve alternatives and the evidence for each. Do not choose or average without support.\n\n### Corrections\n\nState the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active.\n\n### Contextual coexistence\n\nPreserve accounts differing by person, time, condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one.\n\n### Deliberate omissions and simplifications\n\nState what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong.\n\n## Construction review\n\nOpen this section only when construction begins.\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\n### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults\n\n### Questions reopened by construction\n\n### Target-representation and tooling losses\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\n### Net status and tool evidence\n```\n\n## Maintenance\n\n- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions.\n- Update the authoritative process spine when ordering or case behavior changes; reference activity and resource entries rather than duplicating their local details.\n- A restatement offered by the agent remains normalization even when accepted. Preserve exact evidence separately where origin matters.\n- For a genuine correction, update the active account and record what changed. For conflict or contextual coexistence, keep the alternatives and their unresolved or selecting conditions visible.\n- Remove irrelevant empty sections. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, or **Omitted** only when that state matters to later work.\n- If construction requires transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that boundary.\n- Record whether no construction was attempted, construction was blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone.\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [ + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "sha256": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "sha256": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf" + }, + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md", + "sha256": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9" + } + ], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 2418, + "inputTokens": 3442, + "outputTokens": 224, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 3666, + "cost": 0.004562 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3539, + "inputTokens": 12, + "outputTokens": 397, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4838, + "totalTokens": 5247, + "cost": 0.0080445 + }, + { + "durationMs": 5913, + "inputTokens": 14, + "outputTokens": 446, + "cacheReadTokens": 4838, + "cacheWriteTokens": 8215, + "totalTokens": 13513, + "cost": 0.01299655 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 11870, + "inputTokens": 3468, + "outputTokens": 1067, + "cacheReadTokens": 4838, + "cacheWriteTokens": 13053, + "totalTokens": 22426, + "cost": 0.025603050000000002 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nHelp me model our approval process as an SDCPN.\n\n## Assistant\nGood—I've loaded the guidance. Now I'll help you model your approval process. Let me start by understanding what you need this model to help you do.\n\n**To orient the interview:** I need to understand a few things about your goal so I can ask the right questions at the right depth.\n\n1. **What do you want to accomplish with this model?** For example, are you trying to reduce approval time, understand where bottlenecks occur, compare alternative approval strategies, or something else?\n\n2. **What counts as your approval process boundary?** Does it start when someone submits a request, or earlier? Does it end when an approval is issued, or do you need to track what happens after?\n\nOnce I understand your objective and scope, I'll walk you through one concrete approval case end-to-end, then ask about how that case varies across your operation.\n- tool activate_skill (toolu_01V1PFoi9QQkPmfBYgd1p2sE): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\\n\\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\\n\\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\\n\\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\\n\\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (toolu_01Hy5BP132ZkvvcLjLqYLg2D): \"# Universal Elicitation Reference\\n\\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\\n\\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Work from purpose\\n\\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\\n\\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\\n\\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\\n\\n### Follow the person's account\\n\\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\\n\\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\\n\\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\\n\\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\\n\\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\\n\\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\\n\\n### Treat divergence as information\\n\\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\\n\\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\\n\\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\\n\\n### Stop honestly\\n\\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\\n\\n### Vague or compressed language\\n\\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\\n\\n### Normative language\\n\\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\\n\\n### Tension within or between accounts\\n\\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\\n\\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\\n\\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\\n\\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\\n\\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\\n\\n### Diminishing yield\\n\\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\\n\\n### Assent without independent wording\\n\\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\\n\\n### Silence and absence\\n\\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\\n\\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\\n\\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\\n\\n### Slice a concrete case\\n\\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\\n\\n### Sweep one property\\n\\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\\n\\n### Ask for the last occurrence\\n\\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\\n\\n### Ask for the basis\\n\\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\\n\\n### Ground a term or artifact\\n\\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\\n\\n### Clarify until observable\\n\\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\\n\\n### Use contrastive cases\\n\\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\\n\\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\\n\\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\\n\\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\\n\\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\\n\\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\\n\\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\\n\\n### Restate for correction\\n\\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\\n\\n### Propose structure for correction\\n\\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\\n\\n### Deposit and defer\\n\\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\\n\\n### Press without trapping\\n\\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\\n\\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\\n\\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\\n\\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\\n\\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\\n\\n### Trade concrete outcomes\\n\\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\\n\\n### Close with one correction opportunity\\n\\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\\n\\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\\n\\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\\n\\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\\n\\n### Before asking\\n\\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\\n\\n### Before recording\\n\\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\\n\\n### Before closing\\n\\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (toolu_01DovAiyCi2Z3sF5dRD6uimf): \"# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\\n\\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\\n\\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\\n\\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\\n\\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\\n\\n### Keep target structure backstage\\n\\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\\n\\n### Preserve operational context\\n\\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\\n\\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\\n\\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\\n\\n### Language and account signals\\n\\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\\n\\n### Operational situation patterns\\n\\n#### Timed work\\n\\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\\n\\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\\n\\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\\n\\n#### Contended resource\\n\\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\\n\\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\\n\\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\\n\\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\\n\\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\\n\\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\\n\\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\\n\\n#### Mode change\\n\\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\\n\\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\\n\\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\\n\\n#### Spatial transfer\\n\\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\\n\\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\\n\\n#### Policy under pressure\\n\\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\\n\\n#### Hidden waiting\\n\\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\\n\\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\\n\\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\\n\\n### Link the slice to the objective\\n\\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\\n\\n### Expose the process spine\\n\\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\\n\\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\\n\\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\\n\\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\\n\\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\\n\\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\\n\\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\\n\\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\\n\\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\\n\\n### Close a resource account\\n\\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\\n\\n### Close a mode change in both directions\\n\\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\\n\\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\\n\\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\\n\\n### Ask what is conserved\\n\\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\\n\\n### Establish retry scope\\n\\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\\n\\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\\n\\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\\n\\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\\n\\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\\n\\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\\n\\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\\n\\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\\n\\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\\n\\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\\n\\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\\n\\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\\n\\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\\n\\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\\n\\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\\n\\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\\n\\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\\n\\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\\n\\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\\n\\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\\n\\n### Purpose and process\\n\\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\\n\\n### Operational semantics\\n\\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\\n\\n### Quantities and context\\n\\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (toolu_0145U6uLi245SMBHeXQ5SKJZ): \"# Process-Model Workpiece and Recording Contract\\n\\nThe workpiece is the shared, recoverable operational account. Elicitation and revision maintain it; construction consumes it. The transcript remains evidence, not the primary model.\\n\\nFollow the person's thread during conversation and file material into the workpiece afterward. Its headings are recording homes, not question order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose, while keeping consequential omissions visible.\\n\\n## Recording distinctions\\n\\nUse these distinctions wherever they carry information; they are not mandatory labels on every sentence:\\n\\n- **Expert evidence** — What the person said, preserving consequential vocabulary, hedges, context, and source regime.\\n- **Working account** — The current normalized operational description accepted for use.\\n- **Agent inference** — An interpretation of evidence, visibly attributed to the agent.\\n- **Assumed** — A value or structure proposed by the agent, with its reason, consequence, and route to checking.\\n- **Unknown** — Asked, but the person does not know.\\n- **Not yet asked** — Relevant and identified, but not yet addressed.\\n- **Deferred** — Left for later, with why it matters and a named source or route to an answer.\\n- **Declined** — The person chose not to answer or include it.\\n- **Conflict** — Accounts cannot yet be used together; preserve both and what could distinguish them.\\n- **Correction** — A current account that replaces an earlier one, retaining enough history to explain the change without leaving both active.\\n- **Contextual coexistence** — Different accounts apply under different people, times, modes, directions, policies, or operating conditions.\\n- **Omitted** — Deliberately outside the model, with why the purpose permits the omission.\\n- **Target loss** — Supported operational meaning the SDCPN or current tools cannot faithfully carry.\\n\\nEvidence and precision are independent. “About three hours” may be supported but coarse; an exact agent-supplied value may be precise-looking but unsupported.\\n\\nKeep one authoritative home for each active claim. Do not accumulate competing summaries. When a later statement differs, establish whether it is a correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before updating the working account.\\n\\n## Workpiece template\\n\\n```markdown\\n# Process-Model Workpiece\\n\\n## Purpose and posture\\n\\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\\n\\n### Who will use it and how\\n\\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\\n\\n### Available time and assumption appetite\\n\\n### What the result must not claim\\n\\n## Operational account\\n\\n### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\\n\\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\\n\\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\\n\\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\\n\\nFor each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; record its ordering in the process spine.\\n\\n### Case and process spine\\n\\nGive the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary: what admits the case, what flows, which activities occur and in what order, what changes the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the work and resources, and what outcome or handoff ends it.\\n\\n#### Primary case: \\n\\n##### Trigger or admission\\n\\n##### Ordered account and references\\n\\n##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes\\n\\n##### Objective dependencies\\n\\n#### Additional or contrasting case: \\n\\nAdd only when a different case exposes consequential structure the primary case does not.\\n\\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\\n\\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\\n\\n### Validation evidence and data sources\\n\\n## Evidence and interpretation\\n\\nKeep evidence beside affected process material where practical. Use this section for evidence spanning several parts of the account or whose relationship needs explanation.\\n\\n### Exact expert evidence\\n\\n### Normalized account\\n\\n### Agent inferences and proposed structure\\n\\n## Open matters and authorship\\n\\n### Assumptions\\n\\nFor each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked.\\n\\n### Unknown to the person\\n\\n### Not yet asked\\n\\n### Declined\\n\\n### Deferred and deposits\\n\\nFor each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it.\\n\\n### Ambiguities and conflicts\\n\\nPreserve alternatives and the evidence for each. Do not choose or average without support.\\n\\n### Corrections\\n\\nState the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active.\\n\\n### Contextual coexistence\\n\\nPreserve accounts differing by person, time, condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one.\\n\\n### Deliberate omissions and simplifications\\n\\nState what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong.\\n\\n## Construction review\\n\\nOpen this section only when construction begins.\\n\\n### Candidate target structures\\n\\n### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults\\n\\n### Questions reopened by construction\\n\\n### Target-representation and tooling losses\\n\\n## Delivery status\\n\\n### What this workpiece currently supports\\n\\n### Consequential gaps\\n\\n### Net status and tool evidence\\n```\\n\\n## Maintenance\\n\\n- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions.\\n- Update the authoritative process spine when ordering or case behavior changes; reference activity and resource entries rather than duplicating their local details.\\n- A restatement offered by the agent remains normalization even when accepted. Preserve exact evidence separately where origin matters.\\n- For a genuine correction, update the active account and record what changed. For conflict or contextual coexistence, keep the alternatives and their unresolved or selecting conditions visible.\\n- Remove irrelevant empty sections. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, or **Omitted** only when that state matters to later work.\\n- If construction requires transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that boundary.\\n- Record whether no construction was attempted, construction was blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone.\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000038", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFFVFAwSFBWQkY1TTVHMDMzM0s0U0VL", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1ETP18BQ76X4N25TN6FJSS6", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP0JPQ82QZ0V6ZHMJK3RG", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Data-aware Colored Petri Net). According to my instructions, I should:\n\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model\n2. Conduct an elicitation interview following the core procedures: establish context and objectives, calibrate to the user's appetite, gather intentions and knowledge, uncover assumptions and requirements\n3. Use concrete examples and walk through cases end-to-end\n4. Keep an assumption ledger\n5. Produce the model in Petrinaut format\n\nLet me start by activating the skill to get the full specialized instructions for process modelling.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01V1PFoi9QQkPmfBYgd1p2sE", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 3 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good, I've activated the skill. Now I need to follow the procedure. The skill instructions tell me to:\n\n1. Use the \"required universal-disclosure action\" - read the universal-elicitation.md from the skill\n2. Then read sdcpn-elicitation.md before asking focused questions\n3. Follow the lifecycle: orient, elicit, maintain workpiece, construct, check, deliver\n\nThe user has asked for help modeling their approval process as an SDCPN. This requires human knowledge about their specific approval process, so I need to do the required disclosure action and load the guidance before asking questions.\n\nLet me read the required resources:", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01Hy5BP132ZkvvcLjLqYLg2D", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n", + "durationMs": 3 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DovAiyCi2Z3sF5dRD6uimf", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_0145U6uLi245SMBHeXQ5SKJZ", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md" + }, + "output": "# Process-Model Workpiece and Recording Contract\n\nThe workpiece is the shared, recoverable operational account. Elicitation and revision maintain it; construction consumes it. The transcript remains evidence, not the primary model.\n\nFollow the person's thread during conversation and file material into the workpiece afterward. Its headings are recording homes, not question order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose, while keeping consequential omissions visible.\n\n## Recording distinctions\n\nUse these distinctions wherever they carry information; they are not mandatory labels on every sentence:\n\n- **Expert evidence** — What the person said, preserving consequential vocabulary, hedges, context, and source regime.\n- **Working account** — The current normalized operational description accepted for use.\n- **Agent inference** — An interpretation of evidence, visibly attributed to the agent.\n- **Assumed** — A value or structure proposed by the agent, with its reason, consequence, and route to checking.\n- **Unknown** — Asked, but the person does not know.\n- **Not yet asked** — Relevant and identified, but not yet addressed.\n- **Deferred** — Left for later, with why it matters and a named source or route to an answer.\n- **Declined** — The person chose not to answer or include it.\n- **Conflict** — Accounts cannot yet be used together; preserve both and what could distinguish them.\n- **Correction** — A current account that replaces an earlier one, retaining enough history to explain the change without leaving both active.\n- **Contextual coexistence** — Different accounts apply under different people, times, modes, directions, policies, or operating conditions.\n- **Omitted** — Deliberately outside the model, with why the purpose permits the omission.\n- **Target loss** — Supported operational meaning the SDCPN or current tools cannot faithfully carry.\n\nEvidence and precision are independent. “About three hours” may be supported but coarse; an exact agent-supplied value may be precise-looking but unsupported.\n\nKeep one authoritative home for each active claim. Do not accumulate competing summaries. When a later statement differs, establish whether it is a correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before updating the working account.\n\n## Workpiece template\n\n```markdown\n# Process-Model Workpiece\n\n## Purpose and posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\n\n### Who will use it and how\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n\n### Available time and assumption appetite\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; record its ordering in the process spine.\n\n### Case and process spine\n\nGive the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary: what admits the case, what flows, which activities occur and in what order, what changes the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the work and resources, and what outcome or handoff ends it.\n\n#### Primary case: \n\n##### Trigger or admission\n\n##### Ordered account and references\n\n##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes\n\n##### Objective dependencies\n\n#### Additional or contrasting case: \n\nAdd only when a different case exposes consequential structure the primary case does not.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\n### Validation evidence and data sources\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\nKeep evidence beside affected process material where practical. Use this section for evidence spanning several parts of the account or whose relationship needs explanation.\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\n### Normalized account\n\n### Agent inferences and proposed structure\n\n## Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nFor each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked.\n\n### Unknown to the person\n\n### Not yet asked\n\n### Declined\n\n### Deferred and deposits\n\nFor each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it.\n\n### Ambiguities and conflicts\n\nPreserve alternatives and the evidence for each. Do not choose or average without support.\n\n### Corrections\n\nState the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active.\n\n### Contextual coexistence\n\nPreserve accounts differing by person, time, condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one.\n\n### Deliberate omissions and simplifications\n\nState what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong.\n\n## Construction review\n\nOpen this section only when construction begins.\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\n### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults\n\n### Questions reopened by construction\n\n### Target-representation and tooling losses\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\n### Net status and tool evidence\n```\n\n## Maintenance\n\n- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions.\n- Update the authoritative process spine when ordering or case behavior changes; reference activity and resource entries rather than duplicating their local details.\n- A restatement offered by the agent remains normalization even when accepted. Preserve exact evidence separately where origin matters.\n- For a genuine correction, update the active account and record what changed. For conflict or contextual coexistence, keep the alternatives and their unresolved or selecting conditions visible.\n- Remove irrelevant empty sections. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, or **Omitted** only when that state matters to later work.\n- If construction requires transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that boundary.\n- Record whether no construction was attempted, construction was blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good. Now I have the full guidance. Let me orient to the user's request:\n\nThe user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN. I need to:\n\n1. **Orient** — Establish enough context to choose the right first move:\n - What decisions or questions does the model need to support?\n - Who will use it and how?\n - What is the boundary? (Just the approval step, or a larger process?)\n - How much time and detail is appropriate?\n - What is the person's tolerance for assumptions?\n\n2. **Elicit** — Follow one concrete case end to end, asking about structure, triggers, conditions, participants, decisions, resources, timing, failures.\n\n3. **Maintain the workpiece** — Record the account as we go.\n\n4. **Construct** when Petrinaut tools are available and the workpiece is ready.\n\nI should start with a kickoff that establishes purpose, posture, scope. I should ask one opening question that leads naturally to a concrete case, not a battery of intake questions. Let me ask about their goals and the boundary of the process.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good—I've loaded the guidance. Now I'll help you model your approval process. Let me start by understanding what you need this model to help you do.\n\n**To orient the interview:** I need to understand a few things about your goal so I can ask the right questions at the right depth.\n\n1. **What do you want to accomplish with this model?** For example, are you trying to reduce approval time, understand where bottlenecks occur, compare alternative approval strategies, or something else?\n\n2. **What counts as your approval process boundary?** Does it start when someone submits a request, or earlier? Does it end when an approval is issued, or do you need to track what happens after?\n\nOnce I understand your objective and scope, I'll walk you through one concrete approval case end-to-end, then ask about how that case varies across your operation.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1ETP0HQR2HC2RZE8X3DVP8E" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:23.448Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:23.451Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:23.472Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:23.478Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP0JPQ82QZ0V6ZHMJK3RG", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:23.478Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP0JPQ82QZ0V6ZHMJK3RG", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:23.478Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277883489 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP0JPQ82QZ0V6ZHMJK3RG", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:24.172Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP0JPQ82QZ0V6ZHMJK3RG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:24.174Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "The user wants", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP0JPQ82QZ0V6ZHMJK3RG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:25.185Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " to", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP0JPQ82QZ0V6ZHMJK3RG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:25.185Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Data-aware Colored Petri Net). According to my instructions, I should:", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP0JPQ82QZ0V6ZHMJK3RG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:25.185Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "\n\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model\n2. Conduct an elicitation interview following the core procedures: establish context and", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP0JPQ82QZ0V6ZHMJK3RG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:25.185Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " objectives, calibrate to the user's appetite, gather intentions and knowledge, uncover assumptions and requirements\n3. Use concrete", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP0JPQ82QZ0V6ZHMJK3RG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:25.185Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " examples and walk through cases end-to-end\n4. Keep an assumption ledger\n5. Produce the model in Petrinaut format\n\nLet", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP0JPQ82QZ0V6ZHMJK3RG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:25.867Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " me start by activating the skill to get the full specialized instructions for process modelling.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP0JPQ82QZ0V6ZHMJK3RG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:25.867Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Data-aware Colored Petri Net). According to my instructions, I should:\n\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model\n2. Conduct an elicitation interview following the core procedures: establish context and objectives, calibrate to the user's appetite, gather intentions and knowledge, uncover assumptions and requirements\n3. Use concrete examples and walk through cases end-to-end\n4. Keep an assumption ledger\n5. Produce the model in Petrinaut format\n\nLet me start by activating the skill to get the full specialized instructions for process modelling.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP0JPQ82QZ0V6ZHMJK3RG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:25.867Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01V1PFoi9QQkPmfBYgd1p2sE", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP0JPQ82QZ0V6ZHMJK3RG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:25.869Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01V1PFoi9QQkPmfBYgd1p2sE", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\": \"sdcpn-modelling", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP0JPQ82QZ0V6ZHMJK3RG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:25.869Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01V1PFoi9QQkPmfBYgd1p2sE", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP0JPQ82QZ0V6ZHMJK3RG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:25.887Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP0JPQ82QZ0V6ZHMJK3RG", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 2418, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011CeczAYLaXFeKieLnzs5Xd", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Data-aware Colored Petri Net). According to my instructions, I should:\n\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model\n2. Conduct an elicitation interview following the core procedures: establish context and objectives, calibrate to the user's appetite, gather intentions and knowledge, uncover assumptions and requirements\n3. Use concrete examples and walk through cases end-to-end\n4. Keep an assumption ledger\n5. Produce the model in Petrinaut format\n\nLet me start by activating the skill to get the full specialized instructions for process modelling.", + "thinkingSignature": "EpkHCpoBCBEYAipAGq3IjESELSjsW/jZ7cdk74wK3XnCDNqRWYFdcEtDTNQSzJK1JHeMTRLP4j/Lv2XUS3yRTgU+K0cAlTbA8oHVczIZY2xhdWRlLWhhaWt1LTQtNS0yMDI1MTAwMTgAQgh0aGlua2luZ1okMWNiODRmYzQtNDdhYS00ZTFmLWE2NjUtOTQwYWI5ZjgxZjg4qAH96NvUBhIMM8BjGdvnNmAYDKliGgye5pHWsNMSmzX1kWAiMECN48XBTqPUnoQKkRfyvcBXH7yxe5woSbFJ74rEpZNWyGITYPpM0ItZXMfbuRPNmyqrBc+W/M5m2BgRlE9M4oEtBLPZE2nDJChZrTyr8AXWJEQbAKX6nfcI1yr9rmMggg5UBWvCozNgBLsHpdwbZ9nGXZSQnKDbA0niiyC9j3pwuIwd0UsmqEL2snkj9DweOh5/cghbgbSo144f8WsAN9RVOnKznZw+SmUFKIvoF9DjnwnX/XoU1KeJziCc3VKpJc+HsxxgudEAo9zfiXXsBtjDCFs1jS8rFN00Zy2AywqwnQMYxwFYijB8FJ9SZzAnUaXfaDVTZJoJR72aNjncELcPbrtPxJTlWtCHJw87FVGyIpiAz0utYSoUqYbxMvhYm27LzXcI4BBHO7O4Hb0VbpOLSo/rcZ3MwDd9FMn/Jr2cbgeII9JTwrdf3cbsGaWql+pX5/tzKIbUQzDtbrnmgwifVhHcqp4AVwccmMDaUH9bjyQBtfeTGb8TjXQc+3fjVu/b0defAXzA7/qu8gQdd/2Uby4sMvezdjOFtoLr76VjhGITcKdclf6ad4p3NwYtEB5P+UOxEMSyZUdWQRtu41DFG71Fy2Gw22iB3nOopJI207f2E2B8hG5lP6FLYLzqZN7zpGcHiJ/mn/01CA7puVuKenNpYoODF1lFMZPrUPY5F1dn7UdDDrsCr5HXsOmvBZhJOP7FW2pXY6hPHfuMszNwNDtSNICHtSRJ1VjZFnPW7ulyZVMYmO+LFFl5gnshDYO0UumIvABuAAf89IICfXma2bclveNgmfCU+NfzbePfw1oR2LAKazwt74ai9p7x9WWFQDiL1a+7g2h0jAL+3GC0NGmXD7ZfdTNEQgUCsroqYXHmwHAdkaSJBgctoN8Cbt1D7In0i0btaBMZ3T2R+V+AarRZmXHED+sbKs9xCIt3uNcgPBBPopdtyAdlm/e9fnuNJF+BSy2ROMToN0EQGAE=" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01V1PFoi9QQkPmfBYgd1p2sE", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3442, + "output": 224, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3666, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0034419999999999997, + "output": 0.0011200000000000001, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.004562 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:25.896Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Data-aware Colored Petri Net). According to my instructions, I should:\n\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model\n2. Conduct an elicitation interview following the core procedures: establish context and objectives, calibrate to the user's appetite, gather intentions and knowledge, uncover assumptions and requirements\n3. Use concrete examples and walk through cases end-to-end\n4. Keep an assumption ledger\n5. Produce the model in Petrinaut format\n\nLet me start by activating the skill to get the full specialized instructions for process modelling.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01V1PFoi9QQkPmfBYgd1p2sE", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3442, + "output": 224, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3666, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0034419999999999997, + "output": 0.0011200000000000001, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.004562 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 162 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277883489, + "responseId": "msg_011CeczAYLaXFeKieLnzs5Xd", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP0JPQ82QZ0V6ZHMJK3RG", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:25.896Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01V1PFoi9QQkPmfBYgd1p2sE", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP0JPQ82QZ0V6ZHMJK3RG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:25.898Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01V1PFoi9QQkPmfBYgd1p2sE", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277885901 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP0JPQ82QZ0V6ZHMJK3RG", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:25.901Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01V1PFoi9QQkPmfBYgd1p2sE", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277885901 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP0JPQ82QZ0V6ZHMJK3RG", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:25.901Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01V1PFoi9QQkPmfBYgd1p2sE", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 3, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP0JPQ82QZ0V6ZHMJK3RG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:25.901Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP0JPQ82QZ0V6ZHMJK3RG", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Data-aware Colored Petri Net). According to my instructions, I should:\n\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model\n2. Conduct an elicitation interview following the core procedures: establish context and objectives, calibrate to the user's appetite, gather intentions and knowledge, uncover assumptions and requirements\n3. Use concrete examples and walk through cases end-to-end\n4. Keep an assumption ledger\n5. Produce the model in Petrinaut format\n\nLet me start by activating the skill to get the full specialized instructions for process modelling.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01V1PFoi9QQkPmfBYgd1p2sE", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3442, + "output": 224, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3666, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0034419999999999997, + "output": 0.0011200000000000001, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.004562 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 162 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277883489, + "responseId": "msg_011CeczAYLaXFeKieLnzs5Xd", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01V1PFoi9QQkPmfBYgd1p2sE", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277885901 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:25.902Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:25.902Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Data-aware Colored Petri Net). According to my instructions, I should:\n\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model\n2. Conduct an elicitation interview following the core procedures: establish context and objectives, calibrate to the user's appetite, gather intentions and knowledge, uncover assumptions and requirements\n3. Use concrete examples and walk through cases end-to-end\n4. Keep an assumption ledger\n5. Produce the model in Petrinaut format\n\nLet me start by activating the skill to get the full specialized instructions for process modelling.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01V1PFoi9QQkPmfBYgd1p2sE", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01V1PFoi9QQkPmfBYgd1p2sE", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:25.903Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277885903 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:26.624Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:26.625Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "Good", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:27.628Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ", I've activated the skill. Now I need to follow the procedure. The skill instructions tell me to:\n\n1. Use the \"required universal-disclosure", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:27.628Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " action\" - read the universal-elicitation.md from the skill\n2. Then read sdcpn-elicitation.md before asking", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:27.628Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " focused questions\n3. Follow the lifecycle: orient, elicit, maintain workpiece, construct, check, deliver\n\nThe user has asked for help modeling", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:28.547Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " their approval process as an SDCPN. This requires human knowledge about their specific", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:28.547Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " approval process, so I need to do the required disclosure action and load the guidance before asking questions", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:28.547Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ".\n\nLet me read the required resources:", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:28.547Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "Good, I've activated the skill. Now I need to follow the procedure. The skill instructions tell me to:\n\n1. Use the \"required universal-disclosure action\" - read the universal-elicitation.md from the skill\n2. Then read sdcpn-elicitation.md before asking focused questions\n3. Follow the lifecycle: orient, elicit, maintain workpiece, construct, check, deliver\n\nThe user has asked for help modeling their approval process as an SDCPN. This requires human knowledge about their specific approval process, so I need to do the required disclosure action and load the guidance before asking questions.\n\nLet me read the required resources:", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:28.547Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01Hy5BP132ZkvvcLjLqYLg2D", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:28.549Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01Hy5BP132ZkvvcLjLqYLg2D", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\": \"/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdc", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:28.549Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01Hy5BP132ZkvvcLjLqYLg2D", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "pn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:28.852Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01Hy5BP132ZkvvcLjLqYLg2D", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:28.852Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DovAiyCi2Z3sF5dRD6uimf", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:28.854Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DovAiyCi2Z3sF5dRD6uimf", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\": \"/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:28.854Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DovAiyCi2Z3sF5dRD6uimf", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:29.328Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DovAiyCi2Z3sF5dRD6uimf", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:29.328Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_0145U6uLi245SMBHeXQ5SKJZ", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:29.329Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_0145U6uLi245SMBHeXQ5SKJZ", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\": \"/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:29.399Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_0145U6uLi245SMBHeXQ5SKJZ", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:29.423Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3539, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011CeczAiaUXbeistFP7i3QG", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, I've activated the skill. Now I need to follow the procedure. The skill instructions tell me to:\n\n1. Use the \"required universal-disclosure action\" - read the universal-elicitation.md from the skill\n2. Then read sdcpn-elicitation.md before asking focused questions\n3. Follow the lifecycle: orient, elicit, maintain workpiece, construct, check, deliver\n\nThe user has asked for help modeling their approval process as an SDCPN. This requires human knowledge about their specific approval process, so I need to do the required disclosure action and load the guidance before asking questions.\n\nLet me read the required resources:", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01Hy5BP132ZkvvcLjLqYLg2D", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01DovAiyCi2Z3sF5dRD6uimf", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_0145U6uLi245SMBHeXQ5SKJZ", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 397, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4838, + "totalTokens": 5247, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.0019850000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.0060475, + "total": 0.0080445 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:29.442Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, I've activated the skill. Now I need to follow the procedure. The skill instructions tell me to:\n\n1. Use the \"required universal-disclosure action\" - read the universal-elicitation.md from the skill\n2. Then read sdcpn-elicitation.md before asking focused questions\n3. Follow the lifecycle: orient, elicit, maintain workpiece, construct, check, deliver\n\nThe user has asked for help modeling their approval process as an SDCPN. This requires human knowledge about their specific approval process, so I need to do the required disclosure action and load the guidance before asking questions.\n\nLet me read the required resources:", + "thinkingSignature": "EvUGCpoBCBEYAipAe1DfPVUD5lEdElUqxd6cKKzYkLxo3X0YbMVhcRjvWzledG/uFaqtnj8xS9eIeZGQG6Y1PtmEiJwXxieDwew6ATIZY2xhdWRlLWhhaWt1LTQtNS0yMDI1MTAwMTgAQgh0aGlua2luZ1okMWNiODRmYzQtNDdhYS00ZTFmLWE2NjUtOTQwYWI5ZjgxZjg4qAGA6dvUBhIM1z3gWfWsVDS4Y1btGgxnpMCzsU4KXdkNsPMiMB0abWam/0bOOMftdcxgjctqM0jKLB4RzzQMqVl/VpRvVBAY6SZxwCyOsG3w8XlbcyqHBUxpa3spwiCyhpGUz5r0LFrv+mwUT+q+W52z6EfWec7D/u3yaGsUqLkbfZ4UtuBJRzDa2Q9HNKpbyaqDFlYX2FbOozCNAQq+s0cCvyeOfYkte7WWla9E9/9yF029w5twltYngUjRATrtLpLBpQ8lAFNbfCcA53LJQnuR32s644PvDvEJkz0SPsZDZmF31zYruKpn6Q0bjs11FEmTakxxg+rcZb15LaAYU52nx0EUJS4gXPfmZjmr7CTWpvSlR63ewqkeET3fgSfhqOlVkD+sLpc08rSqd92/NlKyH6oaW8jxAXEY+sGP1OydoV5TF+zpcc+AxC+uGZ0hpF0dAfdTysJui9iTZkLs3cEbncbwJMludh4mVN3OsWhiov87553hFE5i+E5m1/e1GpMof9Pw9fwMKMLu02GNgtwf6psemUjr6n+0Xsdn6f7xD9qPNCSHN9B8e/RB3bn4AekWt0XOU9/f1mXBCkco1zpz/nSQn82l1km0KlJscwhWEAG9iV1Jqu/aEV5trsdzZUBjQy76oiBGYOXiGKKLzsElg0IZbT0UK1zZEyOZi5CicOOJ17RMXzMu7iom4tmCWX5du6Bs46apbBgOpaRbsMhcrx0DJ6xlNJOJLO8/xoxE45R69YsFVLuB/DYLw5KqUkmTQyZFsh0NH52VfvK5cUylSkpVWP3aei0WarxUxW4hSV4BbfFhH/W1SoRG6ldddvrLQ1N8gqBLw3dvPLk9McJDF26HugE23Q4AOm/FQPfhuNYmRJP3Fww/pAI3yBH2OBvA0aoPcEtntw3iU26+Qp5b4ZePHS1WzL+ZQgVhpz4aSAJkAa7giWO+8iKv1nudTmeCV64PIyi2gqHJRGReGAE=" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01Hy5BP132ZkvvcLjLqYLg2D", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01DovAiyCi2Z3sF5dRD6uimf", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_0145U6uLi245SMBHeXQ5SKJZ", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 397, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4838, + "totalTokens": 5247, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.0019850000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.0060475, + "total": 0.0080445 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 147 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277885903, + "responseId": "msg_011CeczAiaUXbeistFP7i3QG", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:29.442Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01Hy5BP132ZkvvcLjLqYLg2D", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:29.443Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DovAiyCi2Z3sF5dRD6uimf", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:29.443Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_0145U6uLi245SMBHeXQ5SKJZ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:29.443Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01Hy5BP132ZkvvcLjLqYLg2D", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277889446 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:29.446Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01Hy5BP132ZkvvcLjLqYLg2D", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277889446 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:29.446Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DovAiyCi2Z3sF5dRD6uimf", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277889446 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:29.446Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DovAiyCi2Z3sF5dRD6uimf", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277889446 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:29.446Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_0145U6uLi245SMBHeXQ5SKJZ", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Process-Model Workpiece and Recording Contract\n\nThe workpiece is the shared, recoverable operational account. Elicitation and revision maintain it; construction consumes it. The transcript remains evidence, not the primary model.\n\nFollow the person's thread during conversation and file material into the workpiece afterward. Its headings are recording homes, not question order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose, while keeping consequential omissions visible.\n\n## Recording distinctions\n\nUse these distinctions wherever they carry information; they are not mandatory labels on every sentence:\n\n- **Expert evidence** — What the person said, preserving consequential vocabulary, hedges, context, and source regime.\n- **Working account** — The current normalized operational description accepted for use.\n- **Agent inference** — An interpretation of evidence, visibly attributed to the agent.\n- **Assumed** — A value or structure proposed by the agent, with its reason, consequence, and route to checking.\n- **Unknown** — Asked, but the person does not know.\n- **Not yet asked** — Relevant and identified, but not yet addressed.\n- **Deferred** — Left for later, with why it matters and a named source or route to an answer.\n- **Declined** — The person chose not to answer or include it.\n- **Conflict** — Accounts cannot yet be used together; preserve both and what could distinguish them.\n- **Correction** — A current account that replaces an earlier one, retaining enough history to explain the change without leaving both active.\n- **Contextual coexistence** — Different accounts apply under different people, times, modes, directions, policies, or operating conditions.\n- **Omitted** — Deliberately outside the model, with why the purpose permits the omission.\n- **Target loss** — Supported operational meaning the SDCPN or current tools cannot faithfully carry.\n\nEvidence and precision are independent. “About three hours” may be supported but coarse; an exact agent-supplied value may be precise-looking but unsupported.\n\nKeep one authoritative home for each active claim. Do not accumulate competing summaries. When a later statement differs, establish whether it is a correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before updating the working account.\n\n## Workpiece template\n\n```markdown\n# Process-Model Workpiece\n\n## Purpose and posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\n\n### Who will use it and how\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n\n### Available time and assumption appetite\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; record its ordering in the process spine.\n\n### Case and process spine\n\nGive the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary: what admits the case, what flows, which activities occur and in what order, what changes the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the work and resources, and what outcome or handoff ends it.\n\n#### Primary case: \n\n##### Trigger or admission\n\n##### Ordered account and references\n\n##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes\n\n##### Objective dependencies\n\n#### Additional or contrasting case: \n\nAdd only when a different case exposes consequential structure the primary case does not.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\n### Validation evidence and data sources\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\nKeep evidence beside affected process material where practical. Use this section for evidence spanning several parts of the account or whose relationship needs explanation.\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\n### Normalized account\n\n### Agent inferences and proposed structure\n\n## Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nFor each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked.\n\n### Unknown to the person\n\n### Not yet asked\n\n### Declined\n\n### Deferred and deposits\n\nFor each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it.\n\n### Ambiguities and conflicts\n\nPreserve alternatives and the evidence for each. Do not choose or average without support.\n\n### Corrections\n\nState the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active.\n\n### Contextual coexistence\n\nPreserve accounts differing by person, time, condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one.\n\n### Deliberate omissions and simplifications\n\nState what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong.\n\n## Construction review\n\nOpen this section only when construction begins.\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\n### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults\n\n### Questions reopened by construction\n\n### Target-representation and tooling losses\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\n### Net status and tool evidence\n```\n\n## Maintenance\n\n- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions.\n- Update the authoritative process spine when ordering or case behavior changes; reference activity and resource entries rather than duplicating their local details.\n- A restatement offered by the agent remains normalization even when accepted. Preserve exact evidence separately where origin matters.\n- For a genuine correction, update the active account and record what changed. For conflict or contextual coexistence, keep the alternatives and their unresolved or selecting conditions visible.\n- Remove irrelevant empty sections. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, or **Omitted** only when that state matters to later work.\n- If construction requires transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that boundary.\n- Record whether no construction was attempted, construction was blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md", + "lines": 154 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277889446 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 57, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:29.446Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_0145U6uLi245SMBHeXQ5SKJZ", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Process-Model Workpiece and Recording Contract\n\nThe workpiece is the shared, recoverable operational account. Elicitation and revision maintain it; construction consumes it. The transcript remains evidence, not the primary model.\n\nFollow the person's thread during conversation and file material into the workpiece afterward. Its headings are recording homes, not question order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose, while keeping consequential omissions visible.\n\n## Recording distinctions\n\nUse these distinctions wherever they carry information; they are not mandatory labels on every sentence:\n\n- **Expert evidence** — What the person said, preserving consequential vocabulary, hedges, context, and source regime.\n- **Working account** — The current normalized operational description accepted for use.\n- **Agent inference** — An interpretation of evidence, visibly attributed to the agent.\n- **Assumed** — A value or structure proposed by the agent, with its reason, consequence, and route to checking.\n- **Unknown** — Asked, but the person does not know.\n- **Not yet asked** — Relevant and identified, but not yet addressed.\n- **Deferred** — Left for later, with why it matters and a named source or route to an answer.\n- **Declined** — The person chose not to answer or include it.\n- **Conflict** — Accounts cannot yet be used together; preserve both and what could distinguish them.\n- **Correction** — A current account that replaces an earlier one, retaining enough history to explain the change without leaving both active.\n- **Contextual coexistence** — Different accounts apply under different people, times, modes, directions, policies, or operating conditions.\n- **Omitted** — Deliberately outside the model, with why the purpose permits the omission.\n- **Target loss** — Supported operational meaning the SDCPN or current tools cannot faithfully carry.\n\nEvidence and precision are independent. “About three hours” may be supported but coarse; an exact agent-supplied value may be precise-looking but unsupported.\n\nKeep one authoritative home for each active claim. Do not accumulate competing summaries. When a later statement differs, establish whether it is a correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before updating the working account.\n\n## Workpiece template\n\n```markdown\n# Process-Model Workpiece\n\n## Purpose and posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\n\n### Who will use it and how\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n\n### Available time and assumption appetite\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; record its ordering in the process spine.\n\n### Case and process spine\n\nGive the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary: what admits the case, what flows, which activities occur and in what order, what changes the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the work and resources, and what outcome or handoff ends it.\n\n#### Primary case: \n\n##### Trigger or admission\n\n##### Ordered account and references\n\n##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes\n\n##### Objective dependencies\n\n#### Additional or contrasting case: \n\nAdd only when a different case exposes consequential structure the primary case does not.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\n### Validation evidence and data sources\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\nKeep evidence beside affected process material where practical. Use this section for evidence spanning several parts of the account or whose relationship needs explanation.\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\n### Normalized account\n\n### Agent inferences and proposed structure\n\n## Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nFor each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked.\n\n### Unknown to the person\n\n### Not yet asked\n\n### Declined\n\n### Deferred and deposits\n\nFor each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it.\n\n### Ambiguities and conflicts\n\nPreserve alternatives and the evidence for each. Do not choose or average without support.\n\n### Corrections\n\nState the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active.\n\n### Contextual coexistence\n\nPreserve accounts differing by person, time, condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one.\n\n### Deliberate omissions and simplifications\n\nState what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong.\n\n## Construction review\n\nOpen this section only when construction begins.\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\n### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults\n\n### Questions reopened by construction\n\n### Target-representation and tooling losses\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\n### Net status and tool evidence\n```\n\n## Maintenance\n\n- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions.\n- Update the authoritative process spine when ordering or case behavior changes; reference activity and resource entries rather than duplicating their local details.\n- A restatement offered by the agent remains normalization even when accepted. Preserve exact evidence separately where origin matters.\n- For a genuine correction, update the active account and record what changed. For conflict or contextual coexistence, keep the alternatives and their unresolved or selecting conditions visible.\n- Remove irrelevant empty sections. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, or **Omitted** only when that state matters to later work.\n- If construction requires transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that boundary.\n- Record whether no construction was attempted, construction was blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md", + "lines": 154 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277889446 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 58, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:29.446Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01Hy5BP132ZkvvcLjLqYLg2D", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + } + }, + "durationMs": 3, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 59, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:29.448Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DovAiyCi2Z3sF5dRD6uimf", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + } + }, + "durationMs": 2, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 60, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:29.448Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_0145U6uLi245SMBHeXQ5SKJZ", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Process-Model Workpiece and Recording Contract\n\nThe workpiece is the shared, recoverable operational account. Elicitation and revision maintain it; construction consumes it. The transcript remains evidence, not the primary model.\n\nFollow the person's thread during conversation and file material into the workpiece afterward. Its headings are recording homes, not question order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose, while keeping consequential omissions visible.\n\n## Recording distinctions\n\nUse these distinctions wherever they carry information; they are not mandatory labels on every sentence:\n\n- **Expert evidence** — What the person said, preserving consequential vocabulary, hedges, context, and source regime.\n- **Working account** — The current normalized operational description accepted for use.\n- **Agent inference** — An interpretation of evidence, visibly attributed to the agent.\n- **Assumed** — A value or structure proposed by the agent, with its reason, consequence, and route to checking.\n- **Unknown** — Asked, but the person does not know.\n- **Not yet asked** — Relevant and identified, but not yet addressed.\n- **Deferred** — Left for later, with why it matters and a named source or route to an answer.\n- **Declined** — The person chose not to answer or include it.\n- **Conflict** — Accounts cannot yet be used together; preserve both and what could distinguish them.\n- **Correction** — A current account that replaces an earlier one, retaining enough history to explain the change without leaving both active.\n- **Contextual coexistence** — Different accounts apply under different people, times, modes, directions, policies, or operating conditions.\n- **Omitted** — Deliberately outside the model, with why the purpose permits the omission.\n- **Target loss** — Supported operational meaning the SDCPN or current tools cannot faithfully carry.\n\nEvidence and precision are independent. “About three hours” may be supported but coarse; an exact agent-supplied value may be precise-looking but unsupported.\n\nKeep one authoritative home for each active claim. Do not accumulate competing summaries. When a later statement differs, establish whether it is a correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before updating the working account.\n\n## Workpiece template\n\n```markdown\n# Process-Model Workpiece\n\n## Purpose and posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\n\n### Who will use it and how\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n\n### Available time and assumption appetite\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; record its ordering in the process spine.\n\n### Case and process spine\n\nGive the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary: what admits the case, what flows, which activities occur and in what order, what changes the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the work and resources, and what outcome or handoff ends it.\n\n#### Primary case: \n\n##### Trigger or admission\n\n##### Ordered account and references\n\n##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes\n\n##### Objective dependencies\n\n#### Additional or contrasting case: \n\nAdd only when a different case exposes consequential structure the primary case does not.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\n### Validation evidence and data sources\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\nKeep evidence beside affected process material where practical. Use this section for evidence spanning several parts of the account or whose relationship needs explanation.\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\n### Normalized account\n\n### Agent inferences and proposed structure\n\n## Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nFor each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked.\n\n### Unknown to the person\n\n### Not yet asked\n\n### Declined\n\n### Deferred and deposits\n\nFor each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it.\n\n### Ambiguities and conflicts\n\nPreserve alternatives and the evidence for each. Do not choose or average without support.\n\n### Corrections\n\nState the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active.\n\n### Contextual coexistence\n\nPreserve accounts differing by person, time, condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one.\n\n### Deliberate omissions and simplifications\n\nState what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong.\n\n## Construction review\n\nOpen this section only when construction begins.\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\n### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults\n\n### Questions reopened by construction\n\n### Target-representation and tooling losses\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\n### Net status and tool evidence\n```\n\n## Maintenance\n\n- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions.\n- Update the authoritative process spine when ordering or case behavior changes; reference activity and resource entries rather than duplicating their local details.\n- A restatement offered by the agent remains normalization even when accepted. Preserve exact evidence separately where origin matters.\n- For a genuine correction, update the active account and record what changed. For conflict or contextual coexistence, keep the alternatives and their unresolved or selecting conditions visible.\n- Remove irrelevant empty sections. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, or **Omitted** only when that state matters to later work.\n- If construction requires transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that boundary.\n- Record whether no construction was attempted, construction was blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md", + "lines": 154 + } + }, + "durationMs": 2, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 61, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:29.449Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Process-Model Workpiece and Recording Contract\n\nThe workpiece is the shared, recoverable operational account. Elicitation and revision maintain it; construction consumes it. The transcript remains evidence, not the primary model.\n\nFollow the person's thread during conversation and file material into the workpiece afterward. Its headings are recording homes, not question order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose, while keeping consequential omissions visible.\n\n## Recording distinctions\n\nUse these distinctions wherever they carry information; they are not mandatory labels on every sentence:\n\n- **Expert evidence** — What the person said, preserving consequential vocabulary, hedges, context, and source regime.\n- **Working account** — The current normalized operational description accepted for use.\n- **Agent inference** — An interpretation of evidence, visibly attributed to the agent.\n- **Assumed** — A value or structure proposed by the agent, with its reason, consequence, and route to checking.\n- **Unknown** — Asked, but the person does not know.\n- **Not yet asked** — Relevant and identified, but not yet addressed.\n- **Deferred** — Left for later, with why it matters and a named source or route to an answer.\n- **Declined** — The person chose not to answer or include it.\n- **Conflict** — Accounts cannot yet be used together; preserve both and what could distinguish them.\n- **Correction** — A current account that replaces an earlier one, retaining enough history to explain the change without leaving both active.\n- **Contextual coexistence** — Different accounts apply under different people, times, modes, directions, policies, or operating conditions.\n- **Omitted** — Deliberately outside the model, with why the purpose permits the omission.\n- **Target loss** — Supported operational meaning the SDCPN or current tools cannot faithfully carry.\n\nEvidence and precision are independent. “About three hours” may be supported but coarse; an exact agent-supplied value may be precise-looking but unsupported.\n\nKeep one authoritative home for each active claim. Do not accumulate competing summaries. When a later statement differs, establish whether it is a correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before updating the working account.\n\n## Workpiece template\n\n```markdown\n# Process-Model Workpiece\n\n## Purpose and posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\n\n### Who will use it and how\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n\n### Available time and assumption appetite\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; record its ordering in the process spine.\n\n### Case and process spine\n\nGive the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary: what admits the case, what flows, which activities occur and in what order, what changes the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the work and resources, and what outcome or handoff ends it.\n\n#### Primary case: \n\n##### Trigger or admission\n\n##### Ordered account and references\n\n##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes\n\n##### Objective dependencies\n\n#### Additional or contrasting case: \n\nAdd only when a different case exposes consequential structure the primary case does not.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\n### Validation evidence and data sources\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\nKeep evidence beside affected process material where practical. Use this section for evidence spanning several parts of the account or whose relationship needs explanation.\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\n### Normalized account\n\n### Agent inferences and proposed structure\n\n## Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nFor each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked.\n\n### Unknown to the person\n\n### Not yet asked\n\n### Declined\n\n### Deferred and deposits\n\nFor each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it.\n\n### Ambiguities and conflicts\n\nPreserve alternatives and the evidence for each. Do not choose or average without support.\n\n### Corrections\n\nState the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active.\n\n### Contextual coexistence\n\nPreserve accounts differing by person, time, condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one.\n\n### Deliberate omissions and simplifications\n\nState what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong.\n\n## Construction review\n\nOpen this section only when construction begins.\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\n### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults\n\n### Questions reopened by construction\n\n### Target-representation and tooling losses\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\n### Net status and tool evidence\n```\n\n## Maintenance\n\n- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions.\n- Update the authoritative process spine when ordering or case behavior changes; reference activity and resource entries rather than duplicating their local details.\n- A restatement offered by the agent remains normalization even when accepted. Preserve exact evidence separately where origin matters.\n- For a genuine correction, update the active account and record what changed. For conflict or contextual coexistence, keep the alternatives and their unresolved or selecting conditions visible.\n- Remove irrelevant empty sections. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, or **Omitted** only when that state matters to later work.\n- If construction requires transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that boundary.\n- Record whether no construction was attempted, construction was blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP2YE1VJEW6WDVZMYWKSD", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, I've activated the skill. Now I need to follow the procedure. The skill instructions tell me to:\n\n1. Use the \"required universal-disclosure action\" - read the universal-elicitation.md from the skill\n2. Then read sdcpn-elicitation.md before asking focused questions\n3. Follow the lifecycle: orient, elicit, maintain workpiece, construct, check, deliver\n\nThe user has asked for help modeling their approval process as an SDCPN. This requires human knowledge about their specific approval process, so I need to do the required disclosure action and load the guidance before asking questions.\n\nLet me read the required resources:", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01Hy5BP132ZkvvcLjLqYLg2D", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01DovAiyCi2Z3sF5dRD6uimf", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_0145U6uLi245SMBHeXQ5SKJZ", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 397, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4838, + "totalTokens": 5247, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.0019850000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.0060475, + "total": 0.0080445 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 147 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277885903, + "responseId": "msg_011CeczAiaUXbeistFP7i3QG", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01Hy5BP132ZkvvcLjLqYLg2D", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277889446 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DovAiyCi2Z3sF5dRD6uimf", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277889446 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_0145U6uLi245SMBHeXQ5SKJZ", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Process-Model Workpiece and Recording Contract\n\nThe workpiece is the shared, recoverable operational account. Elicitation and revision maintain it; construction consumes it. The transcript remains evidence, not the primary model.\n\nFollow the person's thread during conversation and file material into the workpiece afterward. Its headings are recording homes, not question order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose, while keeping consequential omissions visible.\n\n## Recording distinctions\n\nUse these distinctions wherever they carry information; they are not mandatory labels on every sentence:\n\n- **Expert evidence** — What the person said, preserving consequential vocabulary, hedges, context, and source regime.\n- **Working account** — The current normalized operational description accepted for use.\n- **Agent inference** — An interpretation of evidence, visibly attributed to the agent.\n- **Assumed** — A value or structure proposed by the agent, with its reason, consequence, and route to checking.\n- **Unknown** — Asked, but the person does not know.\n- **Not yet asked** — Relevant and identified, but not yet addressed.\n- **Deferred** — Left for later, with why it matters and a named source or route to an answer.\n- **Declined** — The person chose not to answer or include it.\n- **Conflict** — Accounts cannot yet be used together; preserve both and what could distinguish them.\n- **Correction** — A current account that replaces an earlier one, retaining enough history to explain the change without leaving both active.\n- **Contextual coexistence** — Different accounts apply under different people, times, modes, directions, policies, or operating conditions.\n- **Omitted** — Deliberately outside the model, with why the purpose permits the omission.\n- **Target loss** — Supported operational meaning the SDCPN or current tools cannot faithfully carry.\n\nEvidence and precision are independent. “About three hours” may be supported but coarse; an exact agent-supplied value may be precise-looking but unsupported.\n\nKeep one authoritative home for each active claim. Do not accumulate competing summaries. When a later statement differs, establish whether it is a correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before updating the working account.\n\n## Workpiece template\n\n```markdown\n# Process-Model Workpiece\n\n## Purpose and posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\n\n### Who will use it and how\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n\n### Available time and assumption appetite\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; record its ordering in the process spine.\n\n### Case and process spine\n\nGive the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary: what admits the case, what flows, which activities occur and in what order, what changes the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the work and resources, and what outcome or handoff ends it.\n\n#### Primary case: \n\n##### Trigger or admission\n\n##### Ordered account and references\n\n##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes\n\n##### Objective dependencies\n\n#### Additional or contrasting case: \n\nAdd only when a different case exposes consequential structure the primary case does not.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\n### Validation evidence and data sources\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\nKeep evidence beside affected process material where practical. Use this section for evidence spanning several parts of the account or whose relationship needs explanation.\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\n### Normalized account\n\n### Agent inferences and proposed structure\n\n## Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nFor each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked.\n\n### Unknown to the person\n\n### Not yet asked\n\n### Declined\n\n### Deferred and deposits\n\nFor each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it.\n\n### Ambiguities and conflicts\n\nPreserve alternatives and the evidence for each. Do not choose or average without support.\n\n### Corrections\n\nState the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active.\n\n### Contextual coexistence\n\nPreserve accounts differing by person, time, condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one.\n\n### Deliberate omissions and simplifications\n\nState what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong.\n\n## Construction review\n\nOpen this section only when construction begins.\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\n### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults\n\n### Questions reopened by construction\n\n### Target-representation and tooling losses\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\n### Net status and tool evidence\n```\n\n## Maintenance\n\n- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions.\n- Update the authoritative process spine when ordering or case behavior changes; reference activity and resource entries rather than duplicating their local details.\n- A restatement offered by the agent remains normalization even when accepted. Preserve exact evidence separately where origin matters.\n- For a genuine correction, update the active account and record what changed. For conflict or contextual coexistence, keep the alternatives and their unresolved or selecting conditions visible.\n- Remove irrelevant empty sections. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, or **Omitted** only when that state matters to later work.\n- If construction requires transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that boundary.\n- Record whether no construction was attempted, construction was blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md", + "lines": 154 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277889446 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 62, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:29.449Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP6D9P5HSS786TAWDWX1E", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 63, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:29.449Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP6D9P5HSS786TAWDWX1E", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Data-aware Colored Petri Net). According to my instructions, I should:\n\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model\n2. Conduct an elicitation interview following the core procedures: establish context and objectives, calibrate to the user's appetite, gather intentions and knowledge, uncover assumptions and requirements\n3. Use concrete examples and walk through cases end-to-end\n4. Keep an assumption ledger\n5. Produce the model in Petrinaut format\n\nLet me start by activating the skill to get the full specialized instructions for process modelling.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01V1PFoi9QQkPmfBYgd1p2sE", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01V1PFoi9QQkPmfBYgd1p2sE", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, I've activated the skill. Now I need to follow the procedure. The skill instructions tell me to:\n\n1. Use the \"required universal-disclosure action\" - read the universal-elicitation.md from the skill\n2. Then read sdcpn-elicitation.md before asking focused questions\n3. Follow the lifecycle: orient, elicit, maintain workpiece, construct, check, deliver\n\nThe user has asked for help modeling their approval process as an SDCPN. This requires human knowledge about their specific approval process, so I need to do the required disclosure action and load the guidance before asking questions.\n\nLet me read the required resources:", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01Hy5BP132ZkvvcLjLqYLg2D", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01DovAiyCi2Z3sF5dRD6uimf", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_0145U6uLi245SMBHeXQ5SKJZ", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01Hy5BP132ZkvvcLjLqYLg2D", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DovAiyCi2Z3sF5dRD6uimf", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_0145U6uLi245SMBHeXQ5SKJZ", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Process-Model Workpiece and Recording Contract\n\nThe workpiece is the shared, recoverable operational account. Elicitation and revision maintain it; construction consumes it. The transcript remains evidence, not the primary model.\n\nFollow the person's thread during conversation and file material into the workpiece afterward. Its headings are recording homes, not question order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose, while keeping consequential omissions visible.\n\n## Recording distinctions\n\nUse these distinctions wherever they carry information; they are not mandatory labels on every sentence:\n\n- **Expert evidence** — What the person said, preserving consequential vocabulary, hedges, context, and source regime.\n- **Working account** — The current normalized operational description accepted for use.\n- **Agent inference** — An interpretation of evidence, visibly attributed to the agent.\n- **Assumed** — A value or structure proposed by the agent, with its reason, consequence, and route to checking.\n- **Unknown** — Asked, but the person does not know.\n- **Not yet asked** — Relevant and identified, but not yet addressed.\n- **Deferred** — Left for later, with why it matters and a named source or route to an answer.\n- **Declined** — The person chose not to answer or include it.\n- **Conflict** — Accounts cannot yet be used together; preserve both and what could distinguish them.\n- **Correction** — A current account that replaces an earlier one, retaining enough history to explain the change without leaving both active.\n- **Contextual coexistence** — Different accounts apply under different people, times, modes, directions, policies, or operating conditions.\n- **Omitted** — Deliberately outside the model, with why the purpose permits the omission.\n- **Target loss** — Supported operational meaning the SDCPN or current tools cannot faithfully carry.\n\nEvidence and precision are independent. “About three hours” may be supported but coarse; an exact agent-supplied value may be precise-looking but unsupported.\n\nKeep one authoritative home for each active claim. Do not accumulate competing summaries. When a later statement differs, establish whether it is a correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before updating the working account.\n\n## Workpiece template\n\n```markdown\n# Process-Model Workpiece\n\n## Purpose and posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\n\n### Who will use it and how\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n\n### Available time and assumption appetite\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; record its ordering in the process spine.\n\n### Case and process spine\n\nGive the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary: what admits the case, what flows, which activities occur and in what order, what changes the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the work and resources, and what outcome or handoff ends it.\n\n#### Primary case: \n\n##### Trigger or admission\n\n##### Ordered account and references\n\n##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes\n\n##### Objective dependencies\n\n#### Additional or contrasting case: \n\nAdd only when a different case exposes consequential structure the primary case does not.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\n### Validation evidence and data sources\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\nKeep evidence beside affected process material where practical. Use this section for evidence spanning several parts of the account or whose relationship needs explanation.\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\n### Normalized account\n\n### Agent inferences and proposed structure\n\n## Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nFor each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked.\n\n### Unknown to the person\n\n### Not yet asked\n\n### Declined\n\n### Deferred and deposits\n\nFor each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it.\n\n### Ambiguities and conflicts\n\nPreserve alternatives and the evidence for each. Do not choose or average without support.\n\n### Corrections\n\nState the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active.\n\n### Contextual coexistence\n\nPreserve accounts differing by person, time, condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one.\n\n### Deliberate omissions and simplifications\n\nState what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong.\n\n## Construction review\n\nOpen this section only when construction begins.\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\n### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults\n\n### Questions reopened by construction\n\n### Target-representation and tooling losses\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\n### Net status and tool evidence\n```\n\n## Maintenance\n\n- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions.\n- Update the authoritative process spine when ordering or case behavior changes; reference activity and resource entries rather than duplicating their local details.\n- A restatement offered by the agent remains normalization even when accepted. Preserve exact evidence separately where origin matters.\n- For a genuine correction, update the active account and record what changed. For conflict or contextual coexistence, keep the alternatives and their unresolved or selecting conditions visible.\n- Remove irrelevant empty sections. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, or **Omitted** only when that state matters to later work.\n- If construction requires transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that boundary.\n- Record whether no construction was attempted, construction was blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 64, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:29.449Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277889451 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP6D9P5HSS786TAWDWX1E", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 65, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:30.170Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP6D9P5HSS786TAWDWX1E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 66, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:30.171Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "Good", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP6D9P5HSS786TAWDWX1E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 67, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:31.173Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ".", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP6D9P5HSS786TAWDWX1E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 68, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:31.173Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " Now I have the full guidance. Let me orient to the user's request:\n\nThe user wants to model an approval process as an", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP6D9P5HSS786TAWDWX1E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 69, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:31.173Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " SDCPN. I need to:\n\n1. **Orient** — Establish enough", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP6D9P5HSS786TAWDWX1E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 70, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:31.173Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " context to choose the right first move:\n - What decisions or questions does the model need to support", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP6D9P5HSS786TAWDWX1E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 71, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:32.182Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "?\n - Who will use it and how?\n - What is the boundary? (Just the approval step, or a larger", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP6D9P5HSS786TAWDWX1E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 72, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:32.182Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " process?)\n - How much time and detail is appropriate?\n - What is the person's tolerance for assumptions?\n\n2. **Elicit** — Follow one concrete", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP6D9P5HSS786TAWDWX1E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 73, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:32.182Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " case end to end, asking about structure, triggers, conditions, participants, decisions, resources, timing, failures.\n\n3. **Maintain", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP6D9P5HSS786TAWDWX1E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 74, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:33.216Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " the workpiece** — Record the account as we go.\n\n4. **Construct** when Petrinaut tools are available", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP6D9P5HSS786TAWDWX1E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 75, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:33.216Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " and the workpiece is ready.\n\nI should start with a kickoff that establishes purpose, posture, scope.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP6D9P5HSS786TAWDWX1E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 76, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:33.216Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " I should ask one opening question that leads naturally to a concrete case, not a battery", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP6D9P5HSS786TAWDWX1E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 77, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:33.216Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " of intake questions. Let me ask about their goals and the boundary of the process.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP6D9P5HSS786TAWDWX1E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 78, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:33.417Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "Good. Now I have the full guidance. Let me orient to the user's request:\n\nThe user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN. I need to:\n\n1. **Orient** — Establish enough context to choose the right first move:\n - What decisions or questions does the model need to support?\n - Who will use it and how?\n - What is the boundary? (Just the approval step, or a larger process?)\n - How much time and detail is appropriate?\n - What is the person's tolerance for assumptions?\n\n2. **Elicit** — Follow one concrete case end to end, asking about structure, triggers, conditions, participants, decisions, resources, timing, failures.\n\n3. **Maintain the workpiece** — Record the account as we go.\n\n4. **Construct** when Petrinaut tools are available and the workpiece is ready.\n\nI should start with a kickoff that establishes purpose, posture, scope. I should ask one opening question that leads naturally to a concrete case, not a battery of intake questions. Let me ask about their goals and the boundary of the process.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP6D9P5HSS786TAWDWX1E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 79, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:33.417Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "Good—I've loaded the guidance.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP6D9P5HSS786TAWDWX1E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 80, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:34.423Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " Now I'll help you model your approval process. Let me start by understanding what you need this model to help you do.\n\n**", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP6D9P5HSS786TAWDWX1E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 81, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:34.423Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "To orient the interview:** I need to understand a few things about your goal so I can ask the right questions at", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP6D9P5HSS786TAWDWX1E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 82, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:34.423Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " the right depth.\n\n1. **What do you want to accomplish with this model?** For example, are you trying to reduce approval time, understand where", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP6D9P5HSS786TAWDWX1E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 83, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:35.355Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " bottlenecks occur, compare alternative approval strategies, or something else?\n\n2. **What counts as your approval process boundary?** Does", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP6D9P5HSS786TAWDWX1E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 84, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:35.355Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " it start when someone submits a request, or earlier? Does it end when an approval is issued, or do you need to track what happens after?\n\nOnce", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP6D9P5HSS786TAWDWX1E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 85, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:35.355Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " I understand your objective and scope, I'll walk you through one concrete approval case end-to-end, then ask about how that case varies across your", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP6D9P5HSS786TAWDWX1E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 86, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:35.355Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " operation.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP6D9P5HSS786TAWDWX1E", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 87, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:35.355Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP6D9P5HSS786TAWDWX1E", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 5913, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011CeczAyk3gmtrDboHfkjLF", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good. Now I have the full guidance. Let me orient to the user's request:\n\nThe user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN. I need to:\n\n1. **Orient** — Establish enough context to choose the right first move:\n - What decisions or questions does the model need to support?\n - Who will use it and how?\n - What is the boundary? (Just the approval step, or a larger process?)\n - How much time and detail is appropriate?\n - What is the person's tolerance for assumptions?\n\n2. **Elicit** — Follow one concrete case end to end, asking about structure, triggers, conditions, participants, decisions, resources, timing, failures.\n\n3. **Maintain the workpiece** — Record the account as we go.\n\n4. **Construct** when Petrinaut tools are available and the workpiece is ready.\n\nI should start with a kickoff that establishes purpose, posture, scope. I should ask one opening question that leads naturally to a concrete case, not a battery of intake questions. Let me ask about their goals and the boundary of the process.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good—I've loaded the guidance. Now I'll help you model your approval process. Let me start by understanding what you need this model to help you do.\n\n**To orient the interview:** I need to understand a few things about your goal so I can ask the right questions at the right depth.\n\n1. **What do you want to accomplish with this model?** For example, are you trying to reduce approval time, understand where bottlenecks occur, compare alternative approval strategies, or something else?\n\n2. **What counts as your approval process boundary?** Does it start when someone submits a request, or earlier? Does it end when an approval is issued, or do you need to track what happens after?\n\nOnce I understand your objective and scope, I'll walk you through one concrete approval case end-to-end, then ask about how that case varies across your operation." + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 14, + "output": 446, + "cacheRead": 4838, + "cacheWrite": 8215, + "totalTokens": 13513, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000014, + "output": 0.00223, + "cacheRead": 0.00048380000000000005, + "cacheWrite": 0.01026875, + "total": 0.01299655 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 88, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:35.362Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good. Now I have the full guidance. Let me orient to the user's request:\n\nThe user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN. I need to:\n\n1. **Orient** — Establish enough context to choose the right first move:\n - What decisions or questions does the model need to support?\n - Who will use it and how?\n - What is the boundary? (Just the approval step, or a larger process?)\n - How much time and detail is appropriate?\n - What is the person's tolerance for assumptions?\n\n2. **Elicit** — Follow one concrete case end to end, asking about structure, triggers, conditions, participants, decisions, resources, timing, failures.\n\n3. **Maintain the workpiece** — Record the account as we go.\n\n4. **Construct** when Petrinaut tools are available and the workpiece is ready.\n\nI should start with a kickoff that establishes purpose, posture, scope. I should ask one opening question that leads naturally to a concrete case, not a battery of intake questions. Let me ask about their goals and the boundary of the process.", + "thinkingSignature": "EoUKCpoBCBEYAipAU+PEz+h/Hu38IiLlIKH1/yXZ7EmLX79ABGwanAJFuTMGKbUcnlq3sLZnpfIAQjutLMBpX5lxEN0Qquwa5sKZtTIZY2xhdWRlLWhhaWt1LTQtNS0yMDI1MTAwMTgAQgh0aGlua2luZ1okMWNiODRmYzQtNDdhYS00ZTFmLWE2NjUtOTQwYWI5ZjgxZjg4qAGF6dvUBhIMX95hDe/lnmKdVkJLGgzH2NT0OTozNom2p1siMHToZCwYp0EVRXBz4r/K9k1BpSpBKdJ+bOKYeWQk7Q2bp4xidtCSFOOcrsyuji5j+iqXCJSyCgXvB0UY4w5pkCmWs1DbbVC7VfMip6+cE16umEpAKBtAx6NwHnfuLvnOIBbkVaxmQt6u3YvsngbOSfH76WNke7EhmC9DnC8BS3in6lpx0ljDJ87RgALUDx9E/UuoFLTDCRulGeVvuqhDrAA3BQ3JqA3xJgDEuFP2w4QVKzvrAwFVD0QQz7iEGORGSF4hwMW5PtZeoZ6xVr9R6cjzYJTkoUa+OS50TJkubb7avNC2/mSwIHHCdIBdyNvCeTd7f5e3oSfvCyJjIxjH5s3pDb8U9quRQ5dbP8N5qwWYJJt+ImmmhzR+76+qljtlJS1EMFRYNpnF98Y+pfU7MytMwdDjrynL3K1tYeVY8wnYhwOIxqkDliEECF+6A9txtc9TA2N9r+et80Nks/ql6U28tfOIwTfpBHMwTvqxAV+w2IwCZyEJ5DaxeWnWk6rKdLI2CasT0+wFw4nmRyttnO51kg2Ws+k5bHzgcYemApWMqg+nYn2QHwJnkRj0yo+6wOIsxbLEIw7wRffIA5L3FOpPbIYEtlzywe8xHL1BtaxODH0JwVnmvg1ZzvUTaFmqM3MKksZ7CHemWoLoW+NmhwxQ3fKZ3H6RIB/+KtQE1CzwyALnTVSwI0hCXpaEeBe07usofbYaN2JuwSewHTRNNQKMNYPhexFNqYTQcG3cx/zeOh2v09q3tWYNOXWSBYggfvWRxTPR+Npr0Q6gBEE5K6oolRjJPT8H5czOkWwTs0PgP9GFm36Jj2gr3CA9XxOkixUKICSa6OSac4OSgEUxNoiwYgxBoNxAHysGQOyeggh3wMDd5oWjWlAnbBH4f7e4Ac/pp4adxxvecDQZFqLo7whQKGWzSp0+C+w0z+xSKzbQ6lSCqxyW/mm3eoF7ywRbkXp5BSi6R9SwKgxRYlsrzXLm2p29Wv0pOnXog180MWB8KWlN7bdrZ3pVLzHJZdNewdmpR/iljcn1rm+rUhaS8ZSJWs/CQL/N3Mi/Z9i7u9mNqjztMOlK0PW0uFVhNbxN3lkh+8En8vcIQB6GYJ28cBa6q7HbAkADw5OhAZT+IA95ybPiTvKNNYapjVHmTJ0EdnlwR9vv3NBZdwFjhMF33o2/HkTBmQe437NYDjn/iNAeUHPa6vUa+nhZGu0jeF/wbjkAWF3DLfpQf0N7gS0MfpjJ4hbw092qpHTGDHeFy4y8kThOARQj9wQ6t/SbvvJE0JhJIE/ZsxdSIrs7uUfU3cJWHP2lYCH/TKVFtm891iX6t10/vPzLK+a05Jz5Wcj52/MdssB/qRaZnsDIcqqHinByYWPDN9i1zB9KgTdw1EbiL62T4CkqrRi59lT3wChcMkEfZMRe+8Pdn0Q5UCr9p1nayLHOfBULJvTmvcxix3sLD3dE6ljmDJiD2hgB" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good—I've loaded the guidance. Now I'll help you model your approval process. Let me start by understanding what you need this model to help you do.\n\n**To orient the interview:** I need to understand a few things about your goal so I can ask the right questions at the right depth.\n\n1. **What do you want to accomplish with this model?** For example, are you trying to reduce approval time, understand where bottlenecks occur, compare alternative approval strategies, or something else?\n\n2. **What counts as your approval process boundary?** Does it start when someone submits a request, or earlier? Does it end when an approval is issued, or do you need to track what happens after?\n\nOnce I understand your objective and scope, I'll walk you through one concrete approval case end-to-end, then ask about how that case varies across your operation." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 14, + "output": 446, + "cacheRead": 4838, + "cacheWrite": 8215, + "totalTokens": 13513, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000014, + "output": 0.00223, + "cacheRead": 0.00048380000000000005, + "cacheWrite": 0.01026875, + "total": 0.01299655 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 255 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277889451, + "responseId": "msg_011CeczAyk3gmtrDboHfkjLF", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP6D9P5HSS786TAWDWX1E", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 89, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:35.362Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETP6D9P5HSS786TAWDWX1E", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good. Now I have the full guidance. Let me orient to the user's request:\n\nThe user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN. I need to:\n\n1. **Orient** — Establish enough context to choose the right first move:\n - What decisions or questions does the model need to support?\n - Who will use it and how?\n - What is the boundary? (Just the approval step, or a larger process?)\n - How much time and detail is appropriate?\n - What is the person's tolerance for assumptions?\n\n2. **Elicit** — Follow one concrete case end to end, asking about structure, triggers, conditions, participants, decisions, resources, timing, failures.\n\n3. **Maintain the workpiece** — Record the account as we go.\n\n4. **Construct** when Petrinaut tools are available and the workpiece is ready.\n\nI should start with a kickoff that establishes purpose, posture, scope. I should ask one opening question that leads naturally to a concrete case, not a battery of intake questions. Let me ask about their goals and the boundary of the process.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good—I've loaded the guidance. Now I'll help you model your approval process. Let me start by understanding what you need this model to help you do.\n\n**To orient the interview:** I need to understand a few things about your goal so I can ask the right questions at the right depth.\n\n1. **What do you want to accomplish with this model?** For example, are you trying to reduce approval time, understand where bottlenecks occur, compare alternative approval strategies, or something else?\n\n2. **What counts as your approval process boundary?** Does it start when someone submits a request, or earlier? Does it end when an approval is issued, or do you need to track what happens after?\n\nOnce I understand your objective and scope, I'll walk you through one concrete approval case end-to-end, then ask about how that case varies across your operation." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 14, + "output": 446, + "cacheRead": 4838, + "cacheWrite": 8215, + "totalTokens": 13513, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000014, + "output": 0.00223, + "cacheRead": 0.00048380000000000005, + "cacheWrite": 0.01026875, + "total": 0.01299655 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 255 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277889451, + "responseId": "msg_011CeczAyk3gmtrDboHfkjLF", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 90, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:35.362Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Data-aware Colored Petri Net). According to my instructions, I should:\n\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model\n2. Conduct an elicitation interview following the core procedures: establish context and objectives, calibrate to the user's appetite, gather intentions and knowledge, uncover assumptions and requirements\n3. Use concrete examples and walk through cases end-to-end\n4. Keep an assumption ledger\n5. Produce the model in Petrinaut format\n\nLet me start by activating the skill to get the full specialized instructions for process modelling.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01V1PFoi9QQkPmfBYgd1p2sE", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3442, + "output": 224, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3666, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0034419999999999997, + "output": 0.0011200000000000001, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.004562 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 162 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277883489, + "responseId": "msg_011CeczAYLaXFeKieLnzs5Xd", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01V1PFoi9QQkPmfBYgd1p2sE", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277885901 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, I've activated the skill. Now I need to follow the procedure. The skill instructions tell me to:\n\n1. Use the \"required universal-disclosure action\" - read the universal-elicitation.md from the skill\n2. Then read sdcpn-elicitation.md before asking focused questions\n3. Follow the lifecycle: orient, elicit, maintain workpiece, construct, check, deliver\n\nThe user has asked for help modeling their approval process as an SDCPN. This requires human knowledge about their specific approval process, so I need to do the required disclosure action and load the guidance before asking questions.\n\nLet me read the required resources:", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01Hy5BP132ZkvvcLjLqYLg2D", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01DovAiyCi2Z3sF5dRD6uimf", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_0145U6uLi245SMBHeXQ5SKJZ", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 397, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4838, + "totalTokens": 5247, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.0019850000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.0060475, + "total": 0.0080445 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 147 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788277885903, + "responseId": "msg_011CeczAiaUXbeistFP7i3QG", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01Hy5BP132ZkvvcLjLqYLg2D", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277889446 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DovAiyCi2Z3sF5dRD6uimf", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277889446 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_0145U6uLi245SMBHeXQ5SKJZ", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Process-Model Workpiece and Recording Contract\n\nThe workpiece is the shared, recoverable operational account. Elicitation and revision maintain it; construction consumes it. The transcript remains evidence, not the primary model.\n\nFollow the person's thread during conversation and file material into the workpiece afterward. Its headings are recording homes, not question order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose, while keeping consequential omissions visible.\n\n## Recording distinctions\n\nUse these distinctions wherever they carry information; they are not mandatory labels on every sentence:\n\n- **Expert evidence** — What the person said, preserving consequential vocabulary, hedges, context, and source regime.\n- **Working account** — The current normalized operational description accepted for use.\n- **Agent inference** — An interpretation of evidence, visibly attributed to the agent.\n- **Assumed** — A value or structure proposed by the agent, with its reason, consequence, and route to checking.\n- **Unknown** — Asked, but the person does not know.\n- **Not yet asked** — Relevant and identified, but not yet addressed.\n- **Deferred** — Left for later, with why it matters and a named source or route to an answer.\n- **Declined** — The person chose not to answer or include it.\n- **Conflict** — Accounts cannot yet be used together; preserve both and what could distinguish them.\n- **Correction** — A current account that replaces an earlier one, retaining enough history to explain the change without leaving both active.\n- **Contextual coexistence** — Different accounts apply under different people, times, modes, directions, policies, or operating conditions.\n- **Omitted** — Deliberately outside the model, with why the purpose permits the omission.\n- **Target loss** — Supported operational meaning the SDCPN or current tools cannot faithfully carry.\n\nEvidence and precision are independent. “About three hours” may be supported but coarse; an exact agent-supplied value may be precise-looking but unsupported.\n\nKeep one authoritative home for each active claim. Do not accumulate competing summaries. When a later statement differs, establish whether it is a correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before updating the working account.\n\n## Workpiece template\n\n```markdown\n# Process-Model Workpiece\n\n## Purpose and posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\n\n### Who will use it and how\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n\n### Available time and assumption appetite\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; record its ordering in the process spine.\n\n### Case and process spine\n\nGive the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary: what admits the case, what flows, which activities occur and in what order, what changes the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the work and resources, and what outcome or handoff ends it.\n\n#### Primary case: \n\n##### Trigger or admission\n\n##### Ordered account and references\n\n##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes\n\n##### Objective dependencies\n\n#### Additional or contrasting case: \n\nAdd only when a different case exposes consequential structure the primary case does not.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\n### Validation evidence and data sources\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\nKeep evidence beside affected process material where practical. Use this section for evidence spanning several parts of the account or whose relationship needs explanation.\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\n### Normalized account\n\n### Agent inferences and proposed structure\n\n## Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nFor each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked.\n\n### Unknown to the person\n\n### Not yet asked\n\n### Declined\n\n### Deferred and deposits\n\nFor each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it.\n\n### Ambiguities and conflicts\n\nPreserve alternatives and the evidence for each. Do not choose or average without support.\n\n### Corrections\n\nState the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active.\n\n### Contextual coexistence\n\nPreserve accounts differing by person, time, condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one.\n\n### Deliberate omissions and simplifications\n\nState what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong.\n\n## Construction review\n\nOpen this section only when construction begins.\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\n### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults\n\n### Questions reopened by construction\n\n### Target-representation and tooling losses\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\n### Net status and tool evidence\n```\n\n## Maintenance\n\n- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions.\n- Update the authoritative process spine when ordering or case behavior changes; reference activity and resource entries rather than duplicating their local details.\n- A restatement offered by the agent remains normalization even when accepted. Preserve exact evidence separately where origin matters.\n- For a genuine correction, update the active account and record what changed. For conflict or contextual coexistence, keep the alternatives and their unresolved or selecting conditions visible.\n- Remove irrelevant empty sections. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, or **Omitted** only when that state matters to later work.\n- If construction requires transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that boundary.\n- Record whether no construction was attempted, construction was blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md", + "lines": 154 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788277889446 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good. Now I have the full guidance. Let me orient to the user's request:\n\nThe user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN. I need to:\n\n1. **Orient** — Establish enough context to choose the right first move:\n - What decisions or questions does the model need to support?\n - Who will use it and how?\n - What is the boundary? (Just the approval step, or a larger process?)\n - How much time and detail is appropriate?\n - What is the person's tolerance for assumptions?\n\n2. **Elicit** — Follow one concrete case end to end, asking about structure, triggers, conditions, participants, decisions, resources, timing, failures.\n\n3. **Maintain the workpiece** — Record the account as we go.\n\n4. **Construct** when Petrinaut tools are available and the workpiece is ready.\n\nI should start with a kickoff that establishes purpose, posture, scope. I should ask one opening question that leads naturally to a concrete case, not a battery of intake questions. Let me ask about their goals and the boundary of the process.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good—I've loaded the guidance. Now I'll help you model your approval process. Let me start by understanding what you need this model to help you do.\n\n**To orient the interview:** I need to understand a few things about your goal so I can ask the right questions at the right depth.\n\n1. **What do you want to accomplish with this model?** For example, are you trying to reduce approval time, understand where bottlenecks occur, compare alternative approval strategies, or something else?\n\n2. **What counts as your approval process boundary?** Does it start when someone submits a request, or earlier? Does it end when an approval is issued, or do you need to track what happens after?\n\nOnce I understand your objective and scope, I'll walk you through one concrete approval case end-to-end, then ask about how that case varies across your operation." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 14, + "output": 446, + "cacheRead": 4838, + "cacheWrite": 8215, + "totalTokens": 13513, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000014, + "output": 0.00223, + "cacheRead": 0.00048380000000000005, + "cacheWrite": 0.01026875, + "total": 0.01299655 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 255 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277889451, + "responseId": "msg_011CeczAyk3gmtrDboHfkjLF", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 91, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:35.363Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 11892, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 92, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:35.364Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETP0HSPM09QBFJDSQPWC2R", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETP0JG77BF2WG6YRGVJFRY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 93, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:35.364Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETP0HPVBF5M5G0333K4SEK", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "3a7c4a8dd7726e0dda05c534b5642025c87bb350fd592150e6dc3023d69f3cce", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 94, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:35.364Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "6a1bbb68da22eed1f1179aa133bb9f41a094ef9162300a14c30661f9bad2e0b7", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "b6aa515d5805ef0f7f637cd58afc350d4ae67ff9612d78f2f3f434c90519628b", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "451a12b35374721f32cd9b5aac85a29ff8c8ee66741afb1b2360bc172dbc8fe8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "c04354de75321d89c33ef98e823d670275a4d1f8dbd659bb326a833450792e41", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/scenarios.json": "10e5b6897319045485a33e556d1de05241cbdbe9ddf5e8fa6c72ef73199252c1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/protocol.md": "1ff13a4c5e30c698dd5d2ac252074597639b620b1d9cbaf4d1380fcaa3f9ca32", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md": "c16d5faaa7a450a41d6888dd6d2b3eac88e4687779b0c8f8e6fe4eceeeb241c6", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "b4959142f10c74e9b04a5d0c0dfb3b74dbab8c492a26e34d2c2c8ff9e3eb7cfa" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/paid/packaged-S4-r1.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/paid/packaged-S4-r1.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..eacb19d8e9f --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/runs/paid/packaged-S4-r1.json @@ -0,0 +1,971 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v2-packaged-s4-3a74c888", + "phase": "paid", + "instrumentVersion": "v2", + "candidate": "packaged", + "scenarioId": "S4", + "scenario": { + "title": "Review exposing a human-knowledge gap", + "prompt": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately.", + "stopAfter": "One focused question about the unresolved release distinction.", + "expected": "Load universal elicitation and ask whether rejection releases the reviewer or retains assignment through appeal." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "**Discrepancy found. Stopping here.**\n\nThe operational account explicitly identifies an open question: whether rejection releases the reviewer immediately or holds them during an appeal window. It states: \"The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\"\n\nThe target description resolves this open question by committing to immediate release: \"RecordRejection currently returns it immediately.\"\n\nThis is a consequential decision about an aspect the operational account leaves undecided. Before proceeding, you need to establish which behavior the actual operation requires.\n\n**Question for you:** Does a rejected request release the reviewer immediately, or is there an appeal window during which the reviewer remains reserved?", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "activatedSkills": [], + "toolCalls": [], + "readOutputs": [], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 5373, + "inputTokens": 3545, + "outputTokens": 503, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 4048, + "cost": 0.00606 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 5373, + "inputTokens": 3545, + "outputTokens": 503, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 4048, + "cost": 0.00606 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nReview the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately.\n\n## Assistant\n**Discrepancy found. Stopping here.**\n\nThe operational account explicitly identifies an open question: whether rejection releases the reviewer immediately or holds them during an appeal window. It states: \"The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\"\n\nThe target description resolves this open question by committing to immediate release: \"RecordRejection currently returns it immediately.\"\n\nThis is a consequential decision about an aspect the operational account leaves undecided. Before proceeding, you need to establish which behavior the actual operation requires.\n\n**Question for you:** Does a rejected request release the reviewer immediately, or is there an appeal window during which the reviewer remains reserved?", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPXB02YBRAX1DR1QXW6HR", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000015", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFFVFBYQVhGM1Y4VEtZM1hGTUpTMk0x", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1ETPY45K7HR8N5TM943AGBJ", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPXBWENF4KMZ5FV2BN1PY", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The user is asking me to:\n1. Review a target description against a supplied operational account\n2. Stop after the first consequential action\n3. Not invent an operational rule or mutate a net\n\nLet me parse what we have:\n\n**Operational account** (what the user describes the system should do):\n- A reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked\n- If approved: recording approval releases the reviewer\n- If rejected: UNKNOWN - the account explicitly does not say whether rejection releases immediately or keeps the reviewer assigned during an appeal window\n\n**Target description** (what the model currently implements):\n- StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\n- RecordApproval returns it (matches the operational account)\n- RecordRejection currently returns it immediately (this is a SPECIFIC choice that conflicts with the operational account's stated gap)\n\n**The problem:**\nThe operational account says \"The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\" This is an explicit gap - it's an unknown/undecided aspect.\n\nThe target description commits to one answer: \"RecordRejection currently returns it immediately.\"\n\nThis is consequential because:\n1. It makes a decision about a gap in the operational account\n2. This decision affects the model's behavior (whether reviewers are available for other requests after rejection)\n3. This is exactly the kind of thing I'm instructed NOT to do: \"Do not invent an operational rule\"\n\nThe first consequential action here is to identify this discrepancy and stop.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "**Discrepancy found. Stopping here.**\n\nThe operational account explicitly identifies an open question: whether rejection releases the reviewer immediately or holds them during an appeal window. It states: \"The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\"\n\nThe target description resolves this open question by committing to immediate release: \"RecordRejection currently returns it immediately.\"\n\nThis is a consequential decision about an aspect the operational account leaves undecided. Before proceeding, you need to establish which behavior the actual operation requires.\n\n**Question for you:** Does a rejected request release the reviewer immediately, or is there an appeal window during which the reviewer remains reserved?", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1ETPXAYH3Q59Y93Y99H447Q" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "f685cd9b777192e843fbbd0777a3dcba004b7bb8e2b93b6b19d7cdb19048f4e4", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:52.927Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "f685cd9b777192e843fbbd0777a3dcba004b7bb8e2b93b6b19d7cdb19048f4e4", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:52.930Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPXBQYN2PSG6MPDB5R0CH", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPXB02YBRAX1DR1QXW6HR", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "f685cd9b777192e843fbbd0777a3dcba004b7bb8e2b93b6b19d7cdb19048f4e4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:52.951Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPXB02YBRAX1DR1QXW6HR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPXBQYN2PSG6MPDB5R0CH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "f685cd9b777192e843fbbd0777a3dcba004b7bb8e2b93b6b19d7cdb19048f4e4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:52.956Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPXBWENF4KMZ5FV2BN1PY", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPXB02YBRAX1DR1QXW6HR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPXBQYN2PSG6MPDB5R0CH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "f685cd9b777192e843fbbd0777a3dcba004b7bb8e2b93b6b19d7cdb19048f4e4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:52.956Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPXBWENF4KMZ5FV2BN1PY", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "---\nfoo: bar\n---\n\n# Universal Elicitation\n\n## The role (core)\n\nYou are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. \n\nThe domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following.\n\n## The job (core)\n\nInterview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism.\n\n## How to do it\n\n### Procedure\n\n#### Kickoffs\n\n_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._\n\n1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it.\n\n2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.)\n\n#### Trajectories\n\n_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._\n\n1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective\n\n2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should.\n- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end (\"walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping\") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed.\n- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers (\"usually\", \"roughly\", \"mostly fine\") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask.\n- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ \"Is there anything that never happens?\" and \"what am I not asking about?\" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic.\n- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging.\n- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model.\n\n\n#### Closings\n\n_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._\n\n- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need.\n\n\n### Methods\n\n\n\n### Judgment\n\n\n\n### Licenses\n\nYou are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions\n\n### Movements\n\nThe two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in.\n\n### Plugin-specific directives\n\n- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it.\n\n- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions.\n\n- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next.\n\n- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif.\n\n- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded.\n\n- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively.\n\n- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules.\n\n\n\n\n## What \"done\" looks like\n\nWhen the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why.\n\n\n\n## How to check\n\n\n\nYou are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor.\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model.\nThe Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle.\nWhen the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPXB02YBRAX1DR1QXW6HR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPXBQYN2PSG6MPDB5R0CH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "f685cd9b777192e843fbbd0777a3dcba004b7bb8e2b93b6b19d7cdb19048f4e4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:52.957Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788277912970 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPXBWENF4KMZ5FV2BN1PY", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPXB02YBRAX1DR1QXW6HR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPXBQYN2PSG6MPDB5R0CH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "f685cd9b777192e843fbbd0777a3dcba004b7bb8e2b93b6b19d7cdb19048f4e4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:53.734Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPXB02YBRAX1DR1QXW6HR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPXBQYN2PSG6MPDB5R0CH", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPXBWENF4KMZ5FV2BN1PY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "f685cd9b777192e843fbbd0777a3dcba004b7bb8e2b93b6b19d7cdb19048f4e4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:53.736Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "The", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPXB02YBRAX1DR1QXW6HR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPXBQYN2PSG6MPDB5R0CH", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPXBWENF4KMZ5FV2BN1PY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "f685cd9b777192e843fbbd0777a3dcba004b7bb8e2b93b6b19d7cdb19048f4e4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:54.738Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " user is asking me to:\n1. Review a target description against a supplied operational account\n2. Stop after the first consequential action\n3. Not invent an operational rule or mutate a net\n\nLet me parse what we have:\n\n**", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPXB02YBRAX1DR1QXW6HR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPXBQYN2PSG6MPDB5R0CH", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPXBWENF4KMZ5FV2BN1PY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "f685cd9b777192e843fbbd0777a3dcba004b7bb8e2b93b6b19d7cdb19048f4e4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:54.738Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "Operational account** (what the user describes the system should do):\n- A reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked\n- If", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPXB02YBRAX1DR1QXW6HR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPXBQYN2PSG6MPDB5R0CH", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPXBWENF4KMZ5FV2BN1PY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "f685cd9b777192e843fbbd0777a3dcba004b7bb8e2b93b6b19d7cdb19048f4e4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:54.738Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " approved: recording approval releases the reviewer\n- If rejected: UNKNOWN - the account explicitly does not say whether rejection releases immediately", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPXB02YBRAX1DR1QXW6HR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPXBQYN2PSG6MPDB5R0CH", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPXBWENF4KMZ5FV2BN1PY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "f685cd9b777192e843fbbd0777a3dcba004b7bb8e2b93b6b19d7cdb19048f4e4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:54.738Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " or keeps the reviewer assigned during an appeal window\n\n**Target description** (what the model currently implements):\n- StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\n- RecordApproval returns it (matches the operational account)\n- RecordRejection currently", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPXB02YBRAX1DR1QXW6HR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPXBQYN2PSG6MPDB5R0CH", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPXBWENF4KMZ5FV2BN1PY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "f685cd9b777192e843fbbd0777a3dcba004b7bb8e2b93b6b19d7cdb19048f4e4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:56.014Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " returns it immediately (this is a SPECIFIC choice that conflicts with the operational account's stated gap)\n\n**The", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPXB02YBRAX1DR1QXW6HR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPXBQYN2PSG6MPDB5R0CH", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPXBWENF4KMZ5FV2BN1PY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "f685cd9b777192e843fbbd0777a3dcba004b7bb8e2b93b6b19d7cdb19048f4e4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:56.014Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " problem:**\nThe operational account says \"The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\" This is an explicit gap - it's an unknown", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPXB02YBRAX1DR1QXW6HR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPXBQYN2PSG6MPDB5R0CH", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPXBWENF4KMZ5FV2BN1PY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "f685cd9b777192e843fbbd0777a3dcba004b7bb8e2b93b6b19d7cdb19048f4e4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:56.014Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "/undecided aspect.\n\nThe target description commits to one answer: \"RecordRejection currently returns it immediately.\"\n\nThis is consequential because", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPXB02YBRAX1DR1QXW6HR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPXBQYN2PSG6MPDB5R0CH", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPXBWENF4KMZ5FV2BN1PY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "f685cd9b777192e843fbbd0777a3dcba004b7bb8e2b93b6b19d7cdb19048f4e4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:56.997Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ":\n1. It makes a decision about a gap in the operational account\n2. This decision affects the model's behavior (whether reviewers are available for", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPXB02YBRAX1DR1QXW6HR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPXBQYN2PSG6MPDB5R0CH", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPXBWENF4KMZ5FV2BN1PY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "f685cd9b777192e843fbbd0777a3dcba004b7bb8e2b93b6b19d7cdb19048f4e4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:56.997Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " other requests after rejection)\n3. This is exactly the kind of thing I'm instructed NOT to do:", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPXB02YBRAX1DR1QXW6HR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPXBQYN2PSG6MPDB5R0CH", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPXBWENF4KMZ5FV2BN1PY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "f685cd9b777192e843fbbd0777a3dcba004b7bb8e2b93b6b19d7cdb19048f4e4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:56.997Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " \"Do not invent an operational rule\"\n\nThe first consequential action here is to identify this discrepancy and stop.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPXB02YBRAX1DR1QXW6HR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPXBQYN2PSG6MPDB5R0CH", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPXBWENF4KMZ5FV2BN1PY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "f685cd9b777192e843fbbd0777a3dcba004b7bb8e2b93b6b19d7cdb19048f4e4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:56.997Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "The user is asking me to:\n1. Review a target description against a supplied operational account\n2. Stop after the first consequential action\n3. Not invent an operational rule or mutate a net\n\nLet me parse what we have:\n\n**Operational account** (what the user describes the system should do):\n- A reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked\n- If approved: recording approval releases the reviewer\n- If rejected: UNKNOWN - the account explicitly does not say whether rejection releases immediately or keeps the reviewer assigned during an appeal window\n\n**Target description** (what the model currently implements):\n- StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\n- RecordApproval returns it (matches the operational account)\n- RecordRejection currently returns it immediately (this is a SPECIFIC choice that conflicts with the operational account's stated gap)\n\n**The problem:**\nThe operational account says \"The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\" This is an explicit gap - it's an unknown/undecided aspect.\n\nThe target description commits to one answer: \"RecordRejection currently returns it immediately.\"\n\nThis is consequential because:\n1. It makes a decision about a gap in the operational account\n2. This decision affects the model's behavior (whether reviewers are available for other requests after rejection)\n3. This is exactly the kind of thing I'm instructed NOT to do: \"Do not invent an operational rule\"\n\nThe first consequential action here is to identify this discrepancy and stop.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPXB02YBRAX1DR1QXW6HR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPXBQYN2PSG6MPDB5R0CH", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPXBWENF4KMZ5FV2BN1PY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "f685cd9b777192e843fbbd0777a3dcba004b7bb8e2b93b6b19d7cdb19048f4e4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:56.997Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "**Disc", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPXB02YBRAX1DR1QXW6HR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPXBQYN2PSG6MPDB5R0CH", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPXBWENF4KMZ5FV2BN1PY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "f685cd9b777192e843fbbd0777a3dcba004b7bb8e2b93b6b19d7cdb19048f4e4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:58.001Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "repancy found. Stopping here.**\n\nThe operational account explicitly identifies an open question: whether rejection releases the reviewer immediately or holds", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPXB02YBRAX1DR1QXW6HR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPXBQYN2PSG6MPDB5R0CH", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPXBWENF4KMZ5FV2BN1PY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "f685cd9b777192e843fbbd0777a3dcba004b7bb8e2b93b6b19d7cdb19048f4e4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:58.001Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " them during an appeal window. It states: \"The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\"\n\nThe target description resolves this open question by committing to immediate release: \"RecordRejection currently returns", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPXB02YBRAX1DR1QXW6HR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPXBQYN2PSG6MPDB5R0CH", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPXBWENF4KMZ5FV2BN1PY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "f685cd9b777192e843fbbd0777a3dcba004b7bb8e2b93b6b19d7cdb19048f4e4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:58.001Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " it immediately.\"\n\nThis is a consequential decision about an aspect the operational account leaves undecided. Before proceeding, you need to establish which behavior", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPXB02YBRAX1DR1QXW6HR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPXBQYN2PSG6MPDB5R0CH", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPXBWENF4KMZ5FV2BN1PY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "f685cd9b777192e843fbbd0777a3dcba004b7bb8e2b93b6b19d7cdb19048f4e4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:58.001Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " the actual operation requires.\n\n**Question for you:** Does a rejected request release the reviewer immediately, or is there", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPXB02YBRAX1DR1QXW6HR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPXBQYN2PSG6MPDB5R0CH", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPXBWENF4KMZ5FV2BN1PY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "f685cd9b777192e843fbbd0777a3dcba004b7bb8e2b93b6b19d7cdb19048f4e4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:58.321Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " an appeal window during which the reviewer remains reserved?", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPXB02YBRAX1DR1QXW6HR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPXBQYN2PSG6MPDB5R0CH", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPXBWENF4KMZ5FV2BN1PY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "f685cd9b777192e843fbbd0777a3dcba004b7bb8e2b93b6b19d7cdb19048f4e4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:58.321Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPXBWENF4KMZ5FV2BN1PY", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 5373, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011CeczCiN8yh6v99S6ABjih", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to:\n1. Review a target description against a supplied operational account\n2. Stop after the first consequential action\n3. Not invent an operational rule or mutate a net\n\nLet me parse what we have:\n\n**Operational account** (what the user describes the system should do):\n- A reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked\n- If approved: recording approval releases the reviewer\n- If rejected: UNKNOWN - the account explicitly does not say whether rejection releases immediately or keeps the reviewer assigned during an appeal window\n\n**Target description** (what the model currently implements):\n- StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\n- RecordApproval returns it (matches the operational account)\n- RecordRejection currently returns it immediately (this is a SPECIFIC choice that conflicts with the operational account's stated gap)\n\n**The problem:**\nThe operational account says \"The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\" This is an explicit gap - it's an unknown/undecided aspect.\n\nThe target description commits to one answer: \"RecordRejection currently returns it immediately.\"\n\nThis is consequential because:\n1. It makes a decision about a gap in the operational account\n2. This decision affects the model's behavior (whether reviewers are available for other requests after rejection)\n3. This is exactly the kind of thing I'm instructed NOT to do: \"Do not invent an operational rule\"\n\nThe first consequential action here is to identify this discrepancy and stop.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "**Discrepancy found. Stopping here.**\n\nThe operational account explicitly identifies an open question: whether rejection releases the reviewer immediately or holds them during an appeal window. It states: \"The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\"\n\nThe target description resolves this open question by committing to immediate release: \"RecordRejection currently returns it immediately.\"\n\nThis is a consequential decision about an aspect the operational account leaves undecided. Before proceeding, you need to establish which behavior the actual operation requires.\n\n**Question for you:** Does a rejected request release the reviewer immediately, or is there an appeal window during which the reviewer remains reserved?" + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3545, + "output": 503, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 4048, + "cost": { + "input": 0.003545, + "output": 0.0025150000000000003, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.00606 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPXB02YBRAX1DR1QXW6HR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPXBQYN2PSG6MPDB5R0CH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "f685cd9b777192e843fbbd0777a3dcba004b7bb8e2b93b6b19d7cdb19048f4e4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:58.330Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to:\n1. Review a target description against a supplied operational account\n2. Stop after the first consequential action\n3. Not invent an operational rule or mutate a net\n\nLet me parse what we have:\n\n**Operational account** (what the user describes the system should do):\n- A reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked\n- If approved: recording approval releases the reviewer\n- If rejected: UNKNOWN - the account explicitly does not say whether rejection releases immediately or keeps the reviewer assigned during an appeal window\n\n**Target description** (what the model currently implements):\n- StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\n- RecordApproval returns it (matches the operational account)\n- RecordRejection currently returns it immediately (this is a SPECIFIC choice that conflicts with the operational account's stated gap)\n\n**The problem:**\nThe operational account says \"The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\" This is an explicit gap - it's an unknown/undecided aspect.\n\nThe target description commits to one answer: \"RecordRejection currently returns it immediately.\"\n\nThis is consequential because:\n1. It makes a decision about a gap in the operational account\n2. This decision affects the model's behavior (whether reviewers are available for other requests after rejection)\n3. This is exactly the kind of thing I'm instructed NOT to do: \"Do not invent an operational rule\"\n\nThe first consequential action here is to identify this discrepancy and stop.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "**Discrepancy found. Stopping here.**\n\nThe operational account explicitly identifies an open question: whether rejection releases the reviewer immediately or holds them during an appeal window. It states: \"The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\"\n\nThe target description resolves this open question by committing to immediate release: \"RecordRejection currently returns it immediately.\"\n\nThis is a consequential decision about an aspect the operational account leaves undecided. Before proceeding, you need to establish which behavior the actual operation requires.\n\n**Question for you:** Does a rejected request release the reviewer immediately, or is there an appeal window during which the reviewer remains reserved?" + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3545, + "output": 503, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 4048, + "cost": { + "input": 0.003545, + "output": 0.0025150000000000003, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.00606 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 347 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277912970, + "responseId": "msg_011CeczCiN8yh6v99S6ABjih", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPXBWENF4KMZ5FV2BN1PY", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPXB02YBRAX1DR1QXW6HR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPXBQYN2PSG6MPDB5R0CH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "f685cd9b777192e843fbbd0777a3dcba004b7bb8e2b93b6b19d7cdb19048f4e4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:58.330Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1ETPXBWENF4KMZ5FV2BN1PY", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to:\n1. Review a target description against a supplied operational account\n2. Stop after the first consequential action\n3. Not invent an operational rule or mutate a net\n\nLet me parse what we have:\n\n**Operational account** (what the user describes the system should do):\n- A reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked\n- If approved: recording approval releases the reviewer\n- If rejected: UNKNOWN - the account explicitly does not say whether rejection releases immediately or keeps the reviewer assigned during an appeal window\n\n**Target description** (what the model currently implements):\n- StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\n- RecordApproval returns it (matches the operational account)\n- RecordRejection currently returns it immediately (this is a SPECIFIC choice that conflicts with the operational account's stated gap)\n\n**The problem:**\nThe operational account says \"The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\" This is an explicit gap - it's an unknown/undecided aspect.\n\nThe target description commits to one answer: \"RecordRejection currently returns it immediately.\"\n\nThis is consequential because:\n1. It makes a decision about a gap in the operational account\n2. This decision affects the model's behavior (whether reviewers are available for other requests after rejection)\n3. This is exactly the kind of thing I'm instructed NOT to do: \"Do not invent an operational rule\"\n\nThe first consequential action here is to identify this discrepancy and stop.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "**Discrepancy found. Stopping here.**\n\nThe operational account explicitly identifies an open question: whether rejection releases the reviewer immediately or holds them during an appeal window. It states: \"The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\"\n\nThe target description resolves this open question by committing to immediate release: \"RecordRejection currently returns it immediately.\"\n\nThis is a consequential decision about an aspect the operational account leaves undecided. Before proceeding, you need to establish which behavior the actual operation requires.\n\n**Question for you:** Does a rejected request release the reviewer immediately, or is there an appeal window during which the reviewer remains reserved?" + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3545, + "output": 503, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 4048, + "cost": { + "input": 0.003545, + "output": 0.0025150000000000003, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.00606 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 347 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277912970, + "responseId": "msg_011CeczCiN8yh6v99S6ABjih", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPXB02YBRAX1DR1QXW6HR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPXBQYN2PSG6MPDB5R0CH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "f685cd9b777192e843fbbd0777a3dcba004b7bb8e2b93b6b19d7cdb19048f4e4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:58.330Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to:\n1. Review a target description against a supplied operational account\n2. Stop after the first consequential action\n3. Not invent an operational rule or mutate a net\n\nLet me parse what we have:\n\n**Operational account** (what the user describes the system should do):\n- A reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked\n- If approved: recording approval releases the reviewer\n- If rejected: UNKNOWN - the account explicitly does not say whether rejection releases immediately or keeps the reviewer assigned during an appeal window\n\n**Target description** (what the model currently implements):\n- StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\n- RecordApproval returns it (matches the operational account)\n- RecordRejection currently returns it immediately (this is a SPECIFIC choice that conflicts with the operational account's stated gap)\n\n**The problem:**\nThe operational account says \"The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\" This is an explicit gap - it's an unknown/undecided aspect.\n\nThe target description commits to one answer: \"RecordRejection currently returns it immediately.\"\n\nThis is consequential because:\n1. It makes a decision about a gap in the operational account\n2. This decision affects the model's behavior (whether reviewers are available for other requests after rejection)\n3. This is exactly the kind of thing I'm instructed NOT to do: \"Do not invent an operational rule\"\n\nThe first consequential action here is to identify this discrepancy and stop.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "**Discrepancy found. Stopping here.**\n\nThe operational account explicitly identifies an open question: whether rejection releases the reviewer immediately or holds them during an appeal window. It states: \"The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\"\n\nThe target description resolves this open question by committing to immediate release: \"RecordRejection currently returns it immediately.\"\n\nThis is a consequential decision about an aspect the operational account leaves undecided. Before proceeding, you need to establish which behavior the actual operation requires.\n\n**Question for you:** Does a rejected request release the reviewer immediately, or is there an appeal window during which the reviewer remains reserved?" + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3545, + "output": 503, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 4048, + "cost": { + "input": 0.003545, + "output": 0.0025150000000000003, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.00606 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 347 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788277912970, + "responseId": "msg_011CeczCiN8yh6v99S6ABjih", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPXB02YBRAX1DR1QXW6HR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPXBQYN2PSG6MPDB5R0CH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "f685cd9b777192e843fbbd0777a3dcba004b7bb8e2b93b6b19d7cdb19048f4e4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:58.331Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPXBQYN2PSG6MPDB5R0CH", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 5380, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPXB02YBRAX1DR1QXW6HR", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "f685cd9b777192e843fbbd0777a3dcba004b7bb8e2b93b6b19d7cdb19048f4e4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:58.331Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1ETPXB02YBRAX1DR1QXW6HR", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1ETPXBQYN2PSG6MPDB5R0CH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "f685cd9b777192e843fbbd0777a3dcba004b7bb8e2b93b6b19d7cdb19048f4e4", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:58.332Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1ETPXAXF3V8TKY3XFMJS2M1", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "f685cd9b777192e843fbbd0777a3dcba004b7bb8e2b93b6b19d7cdb19048f4e4", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T15:51:58.332Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "6a1bbb68da22eed1f1179aa133bb9f41a094ef9162300a14c30661f9bad2e0b7", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "b6aa515d5805ef0f7f637cd58afc350d4ae67ff9612d78f2f3f434c90519628b", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "451a12b35374721f32cd9b5aac85a29ff8c8ee66741afb1b2360bc172dbc8fe8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "c04354de75321d89c33ef98e823d670275a4d1f8dbd659bb326a833450792e41", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/scenarios.json": "10e5b6897319045485a33e556d1de05241cbdbe9ddf5e8fa6c72ef73199252c1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/protocol.md": "1ff13a4c5e30c698dd5d2ac252074597639b620b1d9cbaf4d1380fcaa3f9ca32", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md": "c16d5faaa7a450a41d6888dd6d2b3eac88e4687779b0c8f8e6fe4eceeeb241c6", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "b4959142f10c74e9b04a5d0c0dfb3b74dbab8c492a26e34d2c2c8ff9e3eb7cfa" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/comparison.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/comparison.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1cda71be8ce --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/comparison.md @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ +# Flue skill-composition side-quest v3 comparison + +## Outcome + +**Invalid or both topologies behaviorally weak under the full v3 routing thresholds.** + +Candidate B materially outperformed Candidate A on S1 routing: B completed packaged universal and +SDCPN disclosure in two of three runs, while A completed independent disclosure in zero of three. +That repeated paired result is evidence of independent-activation strain. It does not satisfy the +frozen falsification rule, because the first revised-S4 pair bypassed `sdcpn-modelling` and universal +disclosure in both candidates. The shared-router stop rule ended the campaign before S4 +replication, leaving B at zero of one rather than the required two of three. + +Candidate B meets the S1 routing threshold, but neither topology meets the complete cross-scenario +v3 adjudication condition. Retain Candidate B as the existing production fallback, but do not +claim that v3 behaviorally validated it and do not promote Candidate A. + +## Instrument validity + +The hermetic gate established that both candidates crossed the built production `ChatAgent` seam +with the same compact Ampcode core prompt, shared v3 SDCPN router, revised scenarios, model, and +tool availability. + +- The complete compact core prompt and shared v3 append appeared in the first model request. +- The legacy production prompt and its `## The role (core)` marker were absent. +- Universal elicitation bytes were identical between A's skill and B's resource. +- Normalizing the one required-action line made plugin job instructions byte-identical. +- A advertised both `sdcpn-modelling` and `elicitation`; B advertised only `sdcpn-modelling`. +- Faux runs proved both disclosure routes and S2/S3 non-disclosure paths mechanically. +- With no side-quest selector, `ChatAgent` still uses the production core prompt, plugin append, + and skill. + +This removes the v2 legacy-prompt confound and proves mechanics. It does not make paid model +behavior deterministic. + +## Paid routing evidence + +| Scenario | Candidate A — independent | Candidate B — packaged | +| --- | --- | --- | +| S1 required disclosure | **0/3.** Activated only `sdcpn-modelling` in every run; never activated `elicitation` or read SDCPN elicitation guidance. | **2/3.** Runs 1–2 read universal and SDCPN elicitation guidance; run 3 activated only the job skill. | +| S2 restraint | **2/2.** Activated the job skill, performed no universal disclosure, asked no question, and stated supported construction decisions. | Universal restraint **2/2** and job activation **2/2**. Run 1 stated a supported decision; run 2 ended with an avoidable representation question. | +| S3 restraint | Universal restraint **2/2**, job activation **2/2**, supported defect **2/2**. | Universal restraint **2/2**, supported defect **2/2**, but job activation only **1/2**. | +| Revised S4 required disclosure | **0/1.** No skill activation; asked a weak question already answered by the account rather than exposing reviewer availability during appeal. | **0/1.** No skill activation; described the unsupported reviewer-association choice but did not ask the required focused question. | + +### S1 integrated judgment + +Both successful B disclosure runs asked one purpose-focused question in operational vocabulary. +Run 1 also read `workpiece-template.md` prematurely; that is progressive-disclosure overreach but +does not erase the completed topology route. A's first run asked a three-part opening battery. +A's other two outputs asked one purpose question, but universal and SDCPN elicitation judgment had +not entered context, so they fail composition regardless of fluency. + +### Revised S4 shared failure + +The revised prompt no longer announced the missing distinction or supplied the expected question. +Nevertheless, both candidates answered directly from the visible account and target. Neither +obeyed the shared router requiring `sdcpn-modelling` activation for review. Because this failure +occurred before the A/B disclosure action, the pair cannot discriminate topology and triggered the +mandatory stop. + +## Cost and stopping + +V3 completed 16 scenario runs and 37 provider invocations, using 175,762 total tokens, 228,135 ms +summed model latency, and USD 0.2399051. It remained below the separately authorized ceilings of +60 invocations and USD 1.00. + +The campaign completed all S1, S2, and S3 pairs. It stopped after the first S4 pair; four planned +S4 runs were not dispatched. Stopping preserved paired evidence and followed the frozen +shared-failure rule. + +## Decision + +Candidate A is not behaviorally viable under v3: it missed independent disclosure in all three S1 +runs, despite successful job-skill activation and a direct required-action instruction. Candidate +B shows stronger S1 routing, but cannot be declared the behaviorally validated fallback because it +also missed one S1 disclosure and the only S4 disclosure opportunity. + +The bounded result is: + +1. independent skill mounting is mechanically sound but unreliable for the current production + model in this instrument; +2. packaged resource disclosure is more reliable for underspecified opening elicitation; +3. the shared review router remains behaviorally weak; and +4. question dosage, premature workpiece loading, and review routing return to owner-led Mission 4 + runbook work. + +Do not create a v4 by momentum or revise candidate content from these results. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/manifest.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/manifest.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..62f2d877d20 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/manifest.json @@ -0,0 +1,149 @@ +{ + "sideQuestId": "flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3", + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "sourceState": "dirty side-quest instrument; every instrument file is content-addressed below", + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "runtime": { + "boundary": "built production ChatAgent loaded from apps/brunch-agent/dist/app.mjs", + "flue": "2.0.3", + "hermeticProvider": "@earendil-works/pi-ai faux provider 0.83.0", + "constructionToolsMounted": false, + "stop": "first consequential question, finding, or construction decision" + }, + "candidateRenderedText": { + "corePrompt": "runs/hermetic/independent-S1.json#/instrument/renderedSha256/candidateCorePrompt", + "sharedSdcpnAppend": "runs/hermetic/independent-S1.json#/instrument/renderedSha256/v3SdcpnAppend", + "independentPluginActivation": "runs/hermetic/independent-S1.json#/toolCalls/0/output", + "independentElicitationActivation": "runs/hermetic/independent-S1.json#/toolCalls/1/output", + "packagedPluginActivation": "runs/hermetic/packaged-S1.json#/toolCalls/0/output", + "packagedUniversalResource": "runs/hermetic/packaged-S1.json#/toolCalls/1/output" + }, + "sourceSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "d2d42344c40ddeb2471eeeba437032079bd2c7083afdbc2f9de5e823f841d5b8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "ebec2ac5faab6cbbbe26eeeebc2d7ac0ba7dc637fd43ea9b5917f8e0277f5515", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "c7cb5b2222b0d1b5aff861c4056f41ba8825aca284ec774d8e4f0fbf12807314", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "321f8405c12374315d61caf466001d6b4b5cf68b04325df77a7948daaa680de1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/scenarios.json": "1844df940b8de9d10d28e9537f966920aba581b36956a9ac26a3767824ca96cb", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/protocol.md": "ef1443bb02c6c26d4ded6edf9e023579bc32cdc394f90490edfb34eaf32b8ed2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md": "8cd2749c8292f01045ab4282fc7248c07046cecaf14a586a9ef286e2876cf8bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md": "82b035268c07cc8ee4736b5ffdd392c8f153793d2ca6b9ed57271c9b6146de10", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md": "8826b85d32d6c24fbc8f678ec394600676ec61c4a0b83d0a9cfa16be87fc5d76", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "1a2417cc5f9649d459c5efbc87cd3242db99a9717622a6d86073c72835818865" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "candidateCorePrompt": "6a458c0bbbc9dee5b4454a54b032818227ab681ba9f7beaa60d4fe9628f6eb41", + "v3SdcpnAppend": "73cac46487d33051a90cc487ea7abfc11fec4b049af11a108396ec08d44569fb", + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "promptSelection": { + "candidateCorePromptIncluded": true, + "v3SdcpnAppendIncluded": true, + "legacyCorePromptIncluded": false, + "legacyRoleMarkerIncluded": false + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "promptAppendScenarioByteIdenticalBetweenCandidates": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The required-action line uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A adds the mechanically required elicitation skill name and activation-cue description." + ] + }, + "plannedPaidRunOrder": [ + "S1-independent-r1", + "S1-packaged-r1", + "S1-packaged-r2", + "S1-independent-r2", + "S1-independent-r3", + "S1-packaged-r3", + "S2-packaged-r1", + "S2-independent-r1", + "S2-independent-r2", + "S2-packaged-r2", + "S3-packaged-r1", + "S3-independent-r1", + "S3-independent-r2", + "S3-packaged-r2", + "S4-packaged-r1", + "S4-independent-r1", + "S4-independent-r2", + "S4-packaged-r2", + "S4-packaged-r3", + "S4-independent-r3" + ], + "budget": { + "authorizedAdditionalModelInvocations": 60, + "authorizedAdditionalUsd": 1, + "usedModelInvocations": 37, + "usedUsd": 0.2399051, + "stopReason": "The first revised-S4 pair bypassed sdcpn-modelling and universal disclosure in both candidates. This symmetric shared-router failure triggered the frozen stop rule before the remaining S4 pairs." + }, + "routingCounts": { + "S1": { + "independent": "0/3", + "packaged": "2/3" + }, + "S4": { + "independent": "0/1", + "packaged": "0/1" + }, + "restraint": { + "independentUniversalDisclosure": "0/4", + "packagedUniversalDisclosure": "0/4" + } + }, + "hermeticRuns": [ + "runs/hermetic/independent-S1.json", + "runs/hermetic/packaged-S1.json", + "runs/hermetic/independent-S2.json", + "runs/hermetic/packaged-S2.json", + "runs/hermetic/independent-S3.json", + "runs/hermetic/packaged-S3.json", + "runs/hermetic/independent-S4.json", + "runs/hermetic/packaged-S4.json" + ], + "paidRuns": [ + "runs/paid/S1-independent-r1.json", + "runs/paid/S1-packaged-r1.json", + "runs/paid/S1-packaged-r2.json", + "runs/paid/S1-independent-r2.json", + "runs/paid/S1-independent-r3.json", + "runs/paid/S1-packaged-r3.json", + "runs/paid/S2-packaged-r1.json", + "runs/paid/S2-independent-r1.json", + "runs/paid/S2-independent-r2.json", + "runs/paid/S2-packaged-r2.json", + "runs/paid/S3-packaged-r1.json", + "runs/paid/S3-independent-r1.json", + "runs/paid/S3-independent-r2.json", + "runs/paid/S3-packaged-r2.json", + "runs/paid/S4-packaged-r1.json", + "runs/paid/S4-independent-r1.json" + ], + "paidTotals": { + "scenarioRuns": 16, + "modelInvocations": 37, + "inputTokens": 63542, + "outputTokens": 18373, + "cacheReadTokens": 28531, + "cacheWriteTokens": 65316, + "totalTokens": 175762, + "summedModelLatencyMs": 228135, + "providerCostUsd": 0.2399051 + }, + "outcome": "invalid-or-both-behaviorally-weak" +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/hermetic/independent-S1.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/hermetic/independent-S1.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7ea7242f89d --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/hermetic/independent-S1.json @@ -0,0 +1,2876 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v3-independent-s1-c4047af1", + "phase": "hermetic", + "instrumentVersion": "v3", + "candidate": "independent", + "scenarioId": "S1", + "scenario": { + "title": "Underspecified interactive request", + "prompt": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "stopAfter": "The first consequential question.", + "expected": "Ask one high-yield question in operational vocabulary after loading universal and SDCPN elicitation judgment." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling", "elicitation"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling", "elicitation"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "elicitation" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [ + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "sha256": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf" + } + ], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 4, + "inputTokens": 1945, + "outputTokens": 11, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 1945, + "totalTokens": 3901, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3, + "inputTokens": 1970, + "outputTokens": 10, + "cacheReadTokens": 1229, + "cacheWriteTokens": 1971, + "totalTokens": 5180, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3, + "inputTokens": 4348, + "outputTokens": 30, + "cacheReadTokens": 2484, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4349, + "totalTokens": 11211, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 5, + "inputTokens": 4895, + "outputTokens": 32, + "cacheReadTokens": 6117, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4895, + "totalTokens": 15939, + "cost": 0 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 15, + "inputTokens": 13158, + "outputTokens": 83, + "cacheReadTokens": 9830, + "cacheWriteTokens": 13160, + "totalTokens": 36231, + "cost": 0 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nHelp me model our approval process as an SDCPN.\n\n## Assistant\nWhat decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?\n- tool activate_skill (activate-sdcpn): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\\n\\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\\n\\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\\n\\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\\n\\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\\n\"\n- tool activate_skill (activate-elicitation): \"Run the skill named \\\"elicitation\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\\n\\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\\n\\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Work from purpose\\n\\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\\n\\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\\n\\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\\n\\n### Follow the person's account\\n\\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\\n\\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\\n\\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\\n\\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\\n\\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\\n\\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\\n\\n### Treat divergence as information\\n\\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\\n\\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\\n\\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\\n\\n### Stop honestly\\n\\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\\n\\n### Vague or compressed language\\n\\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\\n\\n### Normative language\\n\\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\\n\\n### Tension within or between accounts\\n\\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\\n\\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\\n\\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\\n\\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\\n\\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\\n\\n### Diminishing yield\\n\\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\\n\\n### Assent without independent wording\\n\\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\\n\\n### Silence and absence\\n\\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\\n\\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\\n\\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\\n\\n### Slice a concrete case\\n\\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\\n\\n### Sweep one property\\n\\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\\n\\n### Ask for the last occurrence\\n\\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\\n\\n### Ask for the basis\\n\\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\\n\\n### Ground a term or artifact\\n\\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\\n\\n### Clarify until observable\\n\\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\\n\\n### Use contrastive cases\\n\\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\\n\\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\\n\\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\\n\\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\\n\\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\\n\\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\\n\\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\\n\\n### Restate for correction\\n\\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\\n\\n### Propose structure for correction\\n\\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\\n\\n### Deposit and defer\\n\\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\\n\\n### Press without trapping\\n\\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\\n\\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\\n\\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\\n\\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\\n\\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\\n\\n### Trade concrete outcomes\\n\\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\\n\\n### Close with one correction opportunity\\n\\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\\n\\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\\n\\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\\n\\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\\n\\n### Before asking\\n\\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\\n\\n### Before recording\\n\\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\\n\\n### Before closing\\n\\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-sdcpn-elicitation.md): \"# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\\n\\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\\n\\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\\n\\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\\n\\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\\n\\n### Keep target structure backstage\\n\\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\\n\\n### Preserve operational context\\n\\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\\n\\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\\n\\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\\n\\n### Language and account signals\\n\\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\\n\\n### Operational situation patterns\\n\\n#### Timed work\\n\\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\\n\\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\\n\\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\\n\\n#### Contended resource\\n\\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\\n\\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\\n\\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\\n\\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\\n\\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\\n\\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\\n\\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\\n\\n#### Mode change\\n\\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\\n\\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\\n\\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\\n\\n#### Spatial transfer\\n\\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\\n\\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\\n\\n#### Policy under pressure\\n\\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\\n\\n#### Hidden waiting\\n\\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\\n\\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\\n\\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\\n\\n### Link the slice to the objective\\n\\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\\n\\n### Expose the process spine\\n\\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\\n\\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\\n\\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\\n\\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\\n\\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\\n\\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\\n\\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\\n\\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\\n\\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\\n\\n### Close a resource account\\n\\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\\n\\n### Close a mode change in both directions\\n\\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\\n\\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\\n\\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\\n\\n### Ask what is conserved\\n\\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\\n\\n### Establish retry scope\\n\\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\\n\\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\\n\\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\\n\\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\\n\\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\\n\\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\\n\\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\\n\\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\\n\\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\\n\\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\\n\\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\\n\\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\\n\\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\\n\\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\\n\\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\\n\\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\\n\\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\\n\\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\\n\\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\\n\\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\\n\\n### Purpose and process\\n\\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\\n\\n### Operational semantics\\n\\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\\n\\n### Quantities and context\\n\\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000024", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFGMEdaWVdEMU1NQllLTlZWREFGSlFC", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1F0H0008THMC89QBJ8E6E2T", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0GZZY64YH6RQ5WX4169J7", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 4 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "elicitation" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n", + "durationMs": 1 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1F0GZYWJ2Y152C541E7WRJK" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.462Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.465Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.488Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.494Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0GZZY64YH6RQ5WX4169J7", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.494Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0GZZY64YH6RQ5WX4169J7", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284010286:nep3w9kxif", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.495Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788284010286:nep3w9kxif", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1945, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 1945, + "totalTokens": 3901, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284010287 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0GZZY64YH6RQ5WX4169J7", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.497Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\":\"sdcpn-model", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0GZZY64YH6RQ5WX4169J7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.497Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "ling\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0GZZY64YH6RQ5WX4169J7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.497Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0GZZY64YH6RQ5WX4169J7", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284010286:nep3w9kxif", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 1945, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 1945, + "totalTokens": 3901, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.499Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284010286:nep3w9kxif", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1945, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 1945, + "totalTokens": 3901, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284010287 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0GZZY64YH6RQ5WX4169J7", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.500Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0GZZY64YH6RQ5WX4169J7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.502Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284010505 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0GZZY64YH6RQ5WX4169J7", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.505Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284010505 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0GZZY64YH6RQ5WX4169J7", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.505Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 4, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0GZZY64YH6RQ5WX4169J7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.506Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0GZZY64YH6RQ5WX4169J7", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284010286:nep3w9kxif", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1945, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 1945, + "totalTokens": 3901, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284010287 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284010505 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.506Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00B248E1GD1H5W76D2M", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.507Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00B248E1GD1H5W76D2M", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284010286:nep3w9kxif", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.507Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788284010286:nep3w9kxif", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 1229, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 5180, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284010287 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00B248E1GD1H5W76D2M", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.509Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\":\"eli", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00B248E1GD1H5W76D2M", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.509Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "citation\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00B248E1GD1H5W76D2M", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.509Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00B248E1GD1H5W76D2M", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284010286:nep3w9kxif", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 1229, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 5180, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.510Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284010286:nep3w9kxif", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 1229, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 5180, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284010287 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00B248E1GD1H5W76D2M", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.510Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00B248E1GD1H5W76D2M", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.511Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284010513 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00B248E1GD1H5W76D2M", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.513Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284010513 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00B248E1GD1H5W76D2M", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.513Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + } + }, + "durationMs": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00B248E1GD1H5W76D2M", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.514Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00B248E1GD1H5W76D2M", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284010286:nep3w9kxif", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 1229, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 5180, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284010287 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284010513 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.514Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00KV7DFVNYS53M545GX", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.515Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00KV7DFVNYS53M545GX", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284010286:nep3w9kxif", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.515Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788284010286:nep3w9kxif", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4348, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 2484, + "cacheWrite": 4349, + "totalTokens": 11211, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284010516 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00KV7DFVNYS53M545GX", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.516Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.f", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00KV7DFVNYS53M545GX", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.516Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "lue/packaged-skills/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00KV7DFVNYS53M545GX", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.517Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "skill%3Asdcpn-mo", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00KV7DFVNYS53M545GX", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.517Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "delling%3Aa63c18", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00KV7DFVNYS53M545GX", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.517Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00KV7DFVNYS53M545GX", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.517Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "-elicitation", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00KV7DFVNYS53M545GX", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.517Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": ".md\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00KV7DFVNYS53M545GX", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.517Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00KV7DFVNYS53M545GX", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284010286:nep3w9kxif", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 4348, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 2484, + "cacheWrite": 4349, + "totalTokens": 11211, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.518Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284010286:nep3w9kxif", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4348, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 2484, + "cacheWrite": 4349, + "totalTokens": 11211, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284010516 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00KV7DFVNYS53M545GX", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.518Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00KV7DFVNYS53M545GX", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.519Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284010521 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00KV7DFVNYS53M545GX", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.521Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284010521 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00KV7DFVNYS53M545GX", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.521Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + } + }, + "durationMs": 2, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00KV7DFVNYS53M545GX", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.522Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00KV7DFVNYS53M545GX", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284010286:nep3w9kxif", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4348, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 2484, + "cacheWrite": 4349, + "totalTokens": 11211, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284010516 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284010521 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.523Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00VK7DV23FR99Z6AKVK", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.523Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00VK7DV23FR99Z6AKVK", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284010286:nep3w9kxif", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.523Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788284010286:nep3w9kxif", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 32, + "cacheRead": 6117, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 15939, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284010287 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00VK7DV23FR99Z6AKVK", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.525Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "What decision sh", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00VK7DV23FR99Z6AKVK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.528Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ould this model supp", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00VK7DV23FR99Z6AKVK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.528Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ort, and can", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00VK7DV23FR99Z6AKVK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.528Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " you walk me", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00VK7DV23FR99Z6AKVK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.528Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " through the last ap", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00VK7DV23FR99Z6AKVK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.528Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "proval request from ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00VK7DV23FR99Z6AKVK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.528Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "submission to it", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00VK7DV23FR99Z6AKVK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.528Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "s outcome?", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00VK7DV23FR99Z6AKVK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.528Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00VK7DV23FR99Z6AKVK", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 5, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284010286:nep3w9kxif", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?" + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 32, + "cacheRead": 6117, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 15939, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.528Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284010286:nep3w9kxif", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 32, + "cacheRead": 6117, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 15939, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284010287 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00VK7DV23FR99Z6AKVK", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.528Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H00VK7DV23FR99Z6AKVK", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284010286:nep3w9kxif", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 32, + "cacheRead": 6117, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 15939, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284010287 + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 57, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.530Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284010286:nep3w9kxif", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1945, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 1945, + "totalTokens": 3901, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284010287 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284010505 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284010286:nep3w9kxif", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 1229, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 5180, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284010287 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284010513 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284010286:nep3w9kxif", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4348, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 2484, + "cacheWrite": 4349, + "totalTokens": 11211, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284010516 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284010521 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284010286:nep3w9kxif", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 32, + "cacheRead": 6117, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 15939, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284010287 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 58, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.530Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 44, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 59, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.531Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0GZYY0GYXTRHM6KF0JYJZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0GZZQYYJV2K071ABTAW2D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 60, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.531Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0GZYWD1MMBYKNVVDAFJQB", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "e6db5687310794d444ef1085223576b09a360d1079ab093e5efd768a132a82ff", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 61, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:30.531Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "d2d42344c40ddeb2471eeeba437032079bd2c7083afdbc2f9de5e823f841d5b8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "ebec2ac5faab6cbbbe26eeeebc2d7ac0ba7dc637fd43ea9b5917f8e0277f5515", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "c7cb5b2222b0d1b5aff861c4056f41ba8825aca284ec774d8e4f0fbf12807314", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "321f8405c12374315d61caf466001d6b4b5cf68b04325df77a7948daaa680de1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/scenarios.json": "1844df940b8de9d10d28e9537f966920aba581b36956a9ac26a3767824ca96cb", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/protocol.md": "ef1443bb02c6c26d4ded6edf9e023579bc32cdc394f90490edfb34eaf32b8ed2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md": "8cd2749c8292f01045ab4282fc7248c07046cecaf14a586a9ef286e2876cf8bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md": "82b035268c07cc8ee4736b5ffdd392c8f153793d2ca6b9ed57271c9b6146de10", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md": "8826b85d32d6c24fbc8f678ec394600676ec61c4a0b83d0a9cfa16be87fc5d76", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "1a2417cc5f9649d459c5efbc87cd3242db99a9717622a6d86073c72835818865" + }, + "promptSelection": { + "candidateCorePromptIncluded": true, + "v3SdcpnAppendIncluded": true, + "legacyCorePromptIncluded": false, + "legacyRoleMarkerIncluded": false, + "initialSystemPromptSha256": "2156970b82b41d6893d08177fad8127a336be4afb5fd0bb184a52a7f63878fb8" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "candidateCorePrompt": "6a458c0bbbc9dee5b4454a54b032818227ab681ba9f7beaa60d4fe9628f6eb41", + "v3SdcpnAppend": "73cac46487d33051a90cc487ea7abfc11fec4b049af11a108396ec08d44569fb", + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/hermetic/independent-S2.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/hermetic/independent-S2.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1ab60dda125 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/hermetic/independent-S2.json @@ -0,0 +1,2978 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v3-independent-s2-bfda1ca9", + "phase": "hermetic", + "instrumentVersion": "v3", + "candidate": "independent", + "scenarioId": "S2", + "scenario": { + "title": "Adequate construct-only request", + "prompt": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them.", + "stopAfter": "The first consequential construction decision.", + "expected": "Enter construction guidance without loading universal elicitation or asking a question." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome.", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling", "elicitation"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + }, + "output": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + }, + "output": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [ + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md", + "sha256": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694" + }, + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "sha256": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5" + } + ], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 6, + "inputTokens": 2234, + "outputTokens": 11, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 2234, + "totalTokens": 4479, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 4, + "inputTokens": 1970, + "outputTokens": 29, + "cacheReadTokens": 1518, + "cacheWriteTokens": 1971, + "totalTokens": 5488, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3, + "inputTokens": 3141, + "outputTokens": 27, + "cacheReadTokens": 2773, + "cacheWriteTokens": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9083, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 4, + "inputTokens": 2000, + "outputTokens": 46, + "cacheReadTokens": 5199, + "cacheWriteTokens": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9245, + "cost": 0 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 17, + "inputTokens": 9345, + "outputTokens": 113, + "cacheReadTokens": 9490, + "cacheWriteTokens": 9347, + "totalTokens": 28295, + "cost": 0 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nUse the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them.\n\n## Assistant\nFirst, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome.\n- tool activate_skill (activate-sdcpn): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\\n\\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\\n\\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\\n\\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\\n\\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-pn-construction.md): \"# SDCPN Construction\\n\\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\\n\\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\\n\\n## Construction boundary\\n\\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\\n\\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\\n\\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\\n\\n## Mapping principles\\n\\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\\n| --- | --- |\\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\\n\\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\\n\\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\\n\\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\\n\\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\\n\\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\\n\\n## Construction patterns\\n\\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\\n\\n### Timed work\\n\\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\\n\\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\\n\\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\\n\\n### Contended resource\\n\\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\\n\\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\\n\\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\\n\\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\\n\\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\\n\\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\\n\\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\\n\\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\\n\\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\\n\\n### Mode change\\n\\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\\n\\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\\n\\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\\n\\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\\n\\n### Spatial transfer\\n\\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\\n\\n### Hidden waiting\\n\\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\\n\\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\\n\\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\\n\\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\\n\\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\\n\\nNot acceptable:\\n\\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\\n\\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\\n\\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\\n\\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\\n\\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\\n\\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-checks.md): \"# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\\n\\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\\n\\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\\n\\n## Before construction\\n\\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\\n\\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\\n\\n## During construction\\n\\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\\n\\n## Structural validity\\n\\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\\n\\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\\n\\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\\n\\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\\n\\n## Existing-net revision\\n\\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\\n\\n## Delivery\\n\\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\\n\\nState plainly:\\n\\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\\n\\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000024", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFGMEgwSDZKNTZGMDEwMTFOSjFFOFJE", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1F0H0JBMW1ZY0KN47X1NBPV", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0J9CVKT2DNKCKKWSMNT", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 4 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + }, + "output": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n", + "durationMs": 1 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + }, + "output": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n", + "durationMs": 1 + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1F0H0H7D27A5JMKV6WF3YG5" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.048Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.051Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.075Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.081Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0J9CVKT2DNKCKKWSMNT", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.081Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0J9CVKT2DNKCKKWSMNT", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284010874:y85v0vesb2d", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.081Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788284010874:y85v0vesb2d", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2234, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2234, + "totalTokens": 4479, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284010875 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0J9CVKT2DNKCKKWSMNT", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.084Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\":\"sdcpn-m", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0J9CVKT2DNKCKKWSMNT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.084Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "odelling\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0J9CVKT2DNKCKKWSMNT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.085Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0J9CVKT2DNKCKKWSMNT", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 6, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284010874:y85v0vesb2d", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2234, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2234, + "totalTokens": 4479, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.087Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284010874:y85v0vesb2d", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2234, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2234, + "totalTokens": 4479, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284010875 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0J9CVKT2DNKCKKWSMNT", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.087Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0J9CVKT2DNKCKKWSMNT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.090Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284011092 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0J9CVKT2DNKCKKWSMNT", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.092Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284011092 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0J9CVKT2DNKCKKWSMNT", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.092Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 4, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0J9CVKT2DNKCKKWSMNT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.093Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0J9CVKT2DNKCKKWSMNT", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284010874:y85v0vesb2d", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2234, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2234, + "totalTokens": 4479, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284010875 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284011092 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.094Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0JP20YHVF67W9J0B6B2", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.094Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0JP20YHVF67W9J0B6B2", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284010874:y85v0vesb2d", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.094Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788284010874:y85v0vesb2d", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 1518, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 5488, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284011095 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0JP20YHVF67W9J0B6B2", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.096Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.flue/pack", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0JP20YHVF67W9J0B6B2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.096Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "aged-skills/skil", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0JP20YHVF67W9J0B6B2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.096Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "l%3Asdcpn-modelling%", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0JP20YHVF67W9J0B6B2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.097Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/p", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0JP20YHVF67W9J0B6B2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.097Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "n-construction.md\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0JP20YHVF67W9J0B6B2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.097Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0JP20YHVF67W9J0B6B2", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284010874:y85v0vesb2d", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 1518, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 5488, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.098Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284010874:y85v0vesb2d", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 1518, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 5488, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284011095 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0JP20YHVF67W9J0B6B2", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.098Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0JP20YHVF67W9J0B6B2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.098Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284011099 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0JP20YHVF67W9J0B6B2", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.099Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284011099 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0JP20YHVF67W9J0B6B2", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.099Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + } + }, + "durationMs": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0JP20YHVF67W9J0B6B2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.100Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0JP20YHVF67W9J0B6B2", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284010874:y85v0vesb2d", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 1518, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 5488, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284011095 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284011099 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.101Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0JXBG1SRXEZGGB520SF", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.101Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0JXBG1SRXEZGGB520SF", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284010874:y85v0vesb2d", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.101Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788284010874:y85v0vesb2d", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3141, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 2773, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9083, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284011102 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0JXBG1SRXEZGGB520SF", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.103Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.flue/pack", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0JXBG1SRXEZGGB520SF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.103Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "aged-skills/skill%3A", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0JXBG1SRXEZGGB520SF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.103Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "sdcpn-modelling%3Aa6", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0JXBG1SRXEZGGB520SF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.103Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "3c18f6ff2bfa97/c", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0JXBG1SRXEZGGB520SF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.103Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "hecks.md\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0JXBG1SRXEZGGB520SF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.103Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0JXBG1SRXEZGGB520SF", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284010874:y85v0vesb2d", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3141, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 2773, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9083, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.104Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284010874:y85v0vesb2d", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3141, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 2773, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9083, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284011102 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0JXBG1SRXEZGGB520SF", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.104Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0JXBG1SRXEZGGB520SF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.104Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284011106 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0JXBG1SRXEZGGB520SF", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.106Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284011106 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0JXBG1SRXEZGGB520SF", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.106Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + } + }, + "durationMs": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0JXBG1SRXEZGGB520SF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.106Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0JXBG1SRXEZGGB520SF", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284010874:y85v0vesb2d", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3141, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 2773, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9083, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284011102 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284011106 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.107Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0K44MNH823AWRYGJT9Y", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.108Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0K44MNH823AWRYGJT9Y", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284010874:y85v0vesb2d", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.108Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788284010874:y85v0vesb2d", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 46, + "cacheRead": 5199, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9245, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284010875 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0K44MNH823AWRYGJT9Y", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.109Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "First, facto", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0K44MNH823AWRYGJT9Y", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.112Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "r the timed ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0K44MNH823AWRYGJT9Y", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.112Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "review into star", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0K44MNH823AWRYGJT9Y", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.112Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "t, in-progre", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0K44MNH823AWRYGJT9Y", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.112Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ss, approval", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0K44MNH823AWRYGJT9Y", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.112Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": ", and reject", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0K44MNH823AWRYGJT9Y", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.112Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ion transitions ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0K44MNH823AWRYGJT9Y", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.112Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "so the reviewer toke", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0K44MNH823AWRYGJT9Y", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.112Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "n is reserved during", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0K44MNH823AWRYGJT9Y", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.112Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " the 20-minu", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0K44MNH823AWRYGJT9Y", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 57, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.112Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "te check and", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0K44MNH823AWRYGJT9Y", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 58, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.112Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " returned on either ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0K44MNH823AWRYGJT9Y", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 59, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.112Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "outcome.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0K44MNH823AWRYGJT9Y", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 60, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.112Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0K44MNH823AWRYGJT9Y", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284010874:y85v0vesb2d", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome." + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 46, + "cacheRead": 5199, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9245, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 61, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.112Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284010874:y85v0vesb2d", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 46, + "cacheRead": 5199, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9245, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284010875 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0K44MNH823AWRYGJT9Y", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 62, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.112Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H0K44MNH823AWRYGJT9Y", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284010874:y85v0vesb2d", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 46, + "cacheRead": 5199, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9245, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284010875 + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 63, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.114Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284010874:y85v0vesb2d", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2234, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2234, + "totalTokens": 4479, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284010875 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284011092 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284010874:y85v0vesb2d", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 1518, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 5488, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284011095 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284011099 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284010874:y85v0vesb2d", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3141, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 2773, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9083, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284011102 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284011106 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284010874:y85v0vesb2d", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 46, + "cacheRead": 5199, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9245, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284010875 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 64, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.114Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 39, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 65, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.115Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H0H8G1QS0G1KATFFCTXP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H0J3ZZH2NRP0KJPD8MEB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 66, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.115Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H0H6J56F01011NJ1E8RD", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "b5d78461e6406cb0c05c52b3954f18268cf95779ab451187aaad09681ee1c202", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 67, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.115Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "d2d42344c40ddeb2471eeeba437032079bd2c7083afdbc2f9de5e823f841d5b8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "ebec2ac5faab6cbbbe26eeeebc2d7ac0ba7dc637fd43ea9b5917f8e0277f5515", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "c7cb5b2222b0d1b5aff861c4056f41ba8825aca284ec774d8e4f0fbf12807314", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "321f8405c12374315d61caf466001d6b4b5cf68b04325df77a7948daaa680de1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/scenarios.json": "1844df940b8de9d10d28e9537f966920aba581b36956a9ac26a3767824ca96cb", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/protocol.md": "ef1443bb02c6c26d4ded6edf9e023579bc32cdc394f90490edfb34eaf32b8ed2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md": "8cd2749c8292f01045ab4282fc7248c07046cecaf14a586a9ef286e2876cf8bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md": "82b035268c07cc8ee4736b5ffdd392c8f153793d2ca6b9ed57271c9b6146de10", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md": "8826b85d32d6c24fbc8f678ec394600676ec61c4a0b83d0a9cfa16be87fc5d76", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "1a2417cc5f9649d459c5efbc87cd3242db99a9717622a6d86073c72835818865" + }, + "promptSelection": { + "candidateCorePromptIncluded": true, + "v3SdcpnAppendIncluded": true, + "legacyCorePromptIncluded": false, + "legacyRoleMarkerIncluded": false, + "initialSystemPromptSha256": "2156970b82b41d6893d08177fad8127a336be4afb5fd0bb184a52a7f63878fb8" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "candidateCorePrompt": "6a458c0bbbc9dee5b4454a54b032818227ab681ba9f7beaa60d4fe9628f6eb41", + "v3SdcpnAppend": "73cac46487d33051a90cc487ea7abfc11fec4b049af11a108396ec08d44569fb", + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/hermetic/independent-S3.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/hermetic/independent-S3.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..aca67c56f27 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/hermetic/independent-S3.json @@ -0,0 +1,3029 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v3-independent-s3-8861828e", + "phase": "hermetic", + "instrumentVersion": "v3", + "candidate": "independent", + "scenarioId": "S3", + "scenario": { + "title": "Review with a resolvable target defect", + "prompt": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token.", + "stopAfter": "The first supported defect finding.", + "expected": "Identify the missing reviewer return on rejection without loading universal elicitation." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer.", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling", "elicitation"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + }, + "output": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + }, + "output": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [ + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md", + "sha256": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694" + }, + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "sha256": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5" + } + ], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 4, + "inputTokens": 2106, + "outputTokens": 11, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 2106, + "totalTokens": 4223, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3, + "inputTokens": 1970, + "outputTokens": 29, + "cacheReadTokens": 1391, + "cacheWriteTokens": 1971, + "totalTokens": 5361, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 2, + "inputTokens": 3142, + "outputTokens": 27, + "cacheReadTokens": 2645, + "cacheWriteTokens": 3142, + "totalTokens": 8956, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 5, + "inputTokens": 2000, + "outputTokens": 45, + "cacheReadTokens": 5071, + "cacheWriteTokens": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9116, + "cost": 0 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 14, + "inputTokens": 9218, + "outputTokens": 112, + "cacheReadTokens": 9107, + "cacheWriteTokens": 9219, + "totalTokens": 27656, + "cost": 0 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nReview the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token.\n\n## Assistant\nThe rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer.\n- tool activate_skill (activate-sdcpn): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\\n\\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\\n\\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\\n\\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\\n\\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-pn-construction.md): \"# SDCPN Construction\\n\\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\\n\\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\\n\\n## Construction boundary\\n\\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\\n\\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\\n\\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\\n\\n## Mapping principles\\n\\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\\n| --- | --- |\\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\\n\\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\\n\\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\\n\\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\\n\\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\\n\\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\\n\\n## Construction patterns\\n\\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\\n\\n### Timed work\\n\\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\\n\\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\\n\\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\\n\\n### Contended resource\\n\\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\\n\\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\\n\\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\\n\\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\\n\\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\\n\\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\\n\\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\\n\\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\\n\\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\\n\\n### Mode change\\n\\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\\n\\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\\n\\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\\n\\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\\n\\n### Spatial transfer\\n\\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\\n\\n### Hidden waiting\\n\\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\\n\\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\\n\\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\\n\\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\\n\\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\\n\\nNot acceptable:\\n\\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\\n\\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\\n\\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\\n\\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\\n\\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\\n\\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-checks.md): \"# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\\n\\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\\n\\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\\n\\n## Before construction\\n\\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\\n\\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\\n\\n## During construction\\n\\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\\n\\n## Structural validity\\n\\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\\n\\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\\n\\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\\n\\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\\n\\n## Existing-net revision\\n\\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\\n\\n## Delivery\\n\\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\\n\\nState plainly:\\n\\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\\n\\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000024", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFGMEgxMlo5VlNCODVEQ1FDOUtUWFpN", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1F0H142RQ29TTASGPY5ER79", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H140K38DRKQN8VZYKAEW", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 4 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + }, + "output": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n", + "durationMs": 1 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + }, + "output": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n", + "durationMs": 1 + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1F0H12Z22AKGB19379MQ930" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.617Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.619Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.643Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.648Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H140K38DRKQN8VZYKAEW", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.648Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H140K38DRKQN8VZYKAEW", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284011449:noo1ew5pcup", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.649Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788284011449:noo1ew5pcup", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2106, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2106, + "totalTokens": 4223, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284011449 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H140K38DRKQN8VZYKAEW", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.651Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\":\"sdc", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H140K38DRKQN8VZYKAEW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.652Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "pn-modelling\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H140K38DRKQN8VZYKAEW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.652Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H140K38DRKQN8VZYKAEW", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284011449:noo1ew5pcup", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2106, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2106, + "totalTokens": 4223, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.653Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284011449:noo1ew5pcup", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2106, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2106, + "totalTokens": 4223, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284011449 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H140K38DRKQN8VZYKAEW", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.654Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H140K38DRKQN8VZYKAEW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.656Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284011658 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H140K38DRKQN8VZYKAEW", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.658Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284011658 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H140K38DRKQN8VZYKAEW", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.658Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 4, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H140K38DRKQN8VZYKAEW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.660Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H140K38DRKQN8VZYKAEW", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284011449:noo1ew5pcup", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2106, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2106, + "totalTokens": 4223, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284011449 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284011658 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.660Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14DV3G2NMG6EG1T14ZW", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.661Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14DV3G2NMG6EG1T14ZW", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284011449:noo1ew5pcup", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.661Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788284011449:noo1ew5pcup", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 1391, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 5361, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284011661 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14DV3G2NMG6EG1T14ZW", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.662Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.f", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14DV3G2NMG6EG1T14ZW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.662Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "lue/packaged-ski", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14DV3G2NMG6EG1T14ZW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.663Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "lls/skill%3A", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14DV3G2NMG6EG1T14ZW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.663Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "sdcpn-modelling%3Aa6", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14DV3G2NMG6EG1T14ZW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.663Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "3c18f6ff2bfa97/p", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14DV3G2NMG6EG1T14ZW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.663Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "n-constructi", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14DV3G2NMG6EG1T14ZW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.663Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "on.md\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14DV3G2NMG6EG1T14ZW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.663Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14DV3G2NMG6EG1T14ZW", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284011449:noo1ew5pcup", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 1391, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 5361, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.664Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284011449:noo1ew5pcup", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 1391, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 5361, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284011661 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14DV3G2NMG6EG1T14ZW", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.664Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14DV3G2NMG6EG1T14ZW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.664Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284011666 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14DV3G2NMG6EG1T14ZW", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.666Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284011666 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14DV3G2NMG6EG1T14ZW", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.666Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + } + }, + "durationMs": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14DV3G2NMG6EG1T14ZW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.667Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14DV3G2NMG6EG1T14ZW", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284011449:noo1ew5pcup", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 1391, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 5361, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284011661 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284011666 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.667Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14ME0FAWZJ1F4987Z6H", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.668Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14ME0FAWZJ1F4987Z6H", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284011449:noo1ew5pcup", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.668Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788284011449:noo1ew5pcup", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 2645, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 8956, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284011669 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14ME0FAWZJ1F4987Z6H", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.669Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.flue/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14ME0FAWZJ1F4987Z6H", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.669Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "packaged-skills/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14ME0FAWZJ1F4987Z6H", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.669Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "skill%3Asdcpn-mo", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14ME0FAWZJ1F4987Z6H", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.670Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "delling%3Aa63c18", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14ME0FAWZJ1F4987Z6H", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.670Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "f6ff2bfa97/c", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14ME0FAWZJ1F4987Z6H", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.670Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "hecks.md\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14ME0FAWZJ1F4987Z6H", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.670Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14ME0FAWZJ1F4987Z6H", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 2, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284011449:noo1ew5pcup", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 2645, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 8956, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.671Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284011449:noo1ew5pcup", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 2645, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 8956, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284011669 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14ME0FAWZJ1F4987Z6H", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.671Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14ME0FAWZJ1F4987Z6H", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.671Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284011672 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14ME0FAWZJ1F4987Z6H", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.672Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284011672 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14ME0FAWZJ1F4987Z6H", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.672Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + } + }, + "durationMs": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14ME0FAWZJ1F4987Z6H", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.673Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14ME0FAWZJ1F4987Z6H", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284011449:noo1ew5pcup", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 2645, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 8956, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284011669 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284011672 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.674Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14TVCYT27GDQ4JW0CWM", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.674Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14TVCYT27GDQ4JW0CWM", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284011449:noo1ew5pcup", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.674Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788284011449:noo1ew5pcup", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 45, + "cacheRead": 5071, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9116, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284011449 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14TVCYT27GDQ4JW0CWM", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.675Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "The rejectio", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14TVCYT27GDQ4JW0CWM", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.678Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "n path leaks the", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14TVCYT27GDQ4JW0CWM", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.678Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " reusable review", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14TVCYT27GDQ4JW0CWM", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.678Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "er token: th", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14TVCYT27GDQ4JW0CWM", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.678Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "e account re", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14TVCYT27GDQ4JW0CWM", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.678Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "quires release a", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14TVCYT27GDQ4JW0CWM", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.678Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "fter either outcome,", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14TVCYT27GDQ4JW0CWM", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 57, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.678Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " but RecordRejec", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14TVCYT27GDQ4JW0CWM", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 58, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.678Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "tion has no output a", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14TVCYT27GDQ4JW0CWM", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 59, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.678Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "rc returning", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14TVCYT27GDQ4JW0CWM", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 60, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.678Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " it to Avail", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14TVCYT27GDQ4JW0CWM", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 61, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.678Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ableReviewer", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14TVCYT27GDQ4JW0CWM", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 62, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.678Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": ".", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14TVCYT27GDQ4JW0CWM", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 63, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.678Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14TVCYT27GDQ4JW0CWM", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 5, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284011449:noo1ew5pcup", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer." + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 45, + "cacheRead": 5071, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9116, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 64, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.679Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284011449:noo1ew5pcup", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 45, + "cacheRead": 5071, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9116, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284011449 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14TVCYT27GDQ4JW0CWM", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 65, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.679Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H14TVCYT27GDQ4JW0CWM", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284011449:noo1ew5pcup", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 45, + "cacheRead": 5071, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9116, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284011449 + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 66, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.680Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284011449:noo1ew5pcup", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2106, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2106, + "totalTokens": 4223, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284011449 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284011658 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284011449:noo1ew5pcup", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 1391, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 5361, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284011661 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284011666 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284011449:noo1ew5pcup", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 2645, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 8956, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284011669 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284011672 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284011449:noo1ew5pcup", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 45, + "cacheRead": 5071, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9116, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284011449 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 67, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.680Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 39, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 68, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.681Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H131WY8X4GVBHT64RF0H", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H13TTQE008JMR1NYFXAZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 69, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.681Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H12Z9VSB85DCQC9KTXZM", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "2a8df1a96a53e38fccd26e3b805282fd1875aa508f760c58b82e56324c91b8af", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 70, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:31.681Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "d2d42344c40ddeb2471eeeba437032079bd2c7083afdbc2f9de5e823f841d5b8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "ebec2ac5faab6cbbbe26eeeebc2d7ac0ba7dc637fd43ea9b5917f8e0277f5515", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "c7cb5b2222b0d1b5aff861c4056f41ba8825aca284ec774d8e4f0fbf12807314", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "321f8405c12374315d61caf466001d6b4b5cf68b04325df77a7948daaa680de1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/scenarios.json": "1844df940b8de9d10d28e9537f966920aba581b36956a9ac26a3767824ca96cb", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/protocol.md": "ef1443bb02c6c26d4ded6edf9e023579bc32cdc394f90490edfb34eaf32b8ed2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md": "8cd2749c8292f01045ab4282fc7248c07046cecaf14a586a9ef286e2876cf8bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md": "82b035268c07cc8ee4736b5ffdd392c8f153793d2ca6b9ed57271c9b6146de10", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md": "8826b85d32d6c24fbc8f678ec394600676ec61c4a0b83d0a9cfa16be87fc5d76", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "1a2417cc5f9649d459c5efbc87cd3242db99a9717622a6d86073c72835818865" + }, + "promptSelection": { + "candidateCorePromptIncluded": true, + "v3SdcpnAppendIncluded": true, + "legacyCorePromptIncluded": false, + "legacyRoleMarkerIncluded": false, + "initialSystemPromptSha256": "2156970b82b41d6893d08177fad8127a336be4afb5fd0bb184a52a7f63878fb8" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "candidateCorePrompt": "6a458c0bbbc9dee5b4454a54b032818227ab681ba9f7beaa60d4fe9628f6eb41", + "v3SdcpnAppend": "73cac46487d33051a90cc487ea7abfc11fec4b049af11a108396ec08d44569fb", + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/hermetic/independent-S4.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/hermetic/independent-S4.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0ab308a13b3 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/hermetic/independent-S4.json @@ -0,0 +1,2937 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v3-independent-s4-48450035", + "phase": "hermetic", + "instrumentVersion": "v3", + "candidate": "independent", + "scenarioId": "S4", + "scenario": { + "title": "Review exposing an implicit human-knowledge gap", + "prompt": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while checking a request. Recording approval releases that reviewer. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection also returns it immediately. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer.", + "stopAfter": "One focused question exposing the unresolved appeal and reviewer-availability relationship.", + "expected": "Load universal and SDCPN elicitation judgment, then ask whether appeal responsibility keeps the original reviewer unavailable for new reviews or permits concurrent assignment." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "During the five-business-day appeal window, is the original reviewer still assigned in a way that prevents taking a new review, or can they accept new reviews while answering appeal questions?", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling", "elicitation"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling", "elicitation"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "elicitation" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [ + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "sha256": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf" + } + ], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 5, + "inputTokens": 2113, + "outputTokens": 11, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 2113, + "totalTokens": 4237, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3, + "inputTokens": 1970, + "outputTokens": 10, + "cacheReadTokens": 1398, + "cacheWriteTokens": 1971, + "totalTokens": 5349, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 2, + "inputTokens": 4349, + "outputTokens": 30, + "cacheReadTokens": 2652, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4349, + "totalTokens": 11380, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 6, + "inputTokens": 4895, + "outputTokens": 48, + "cacheReadTokens": 6285, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16123, + "cost": 0 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 16, + "inputTokens": 13327, + "outputTokens": 99, + "cacheReadTokens": 10335, + "cacheWriteTokens": 13328, + "totalTokens": 37089, + "cost": 0 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nReview the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while checking a request. Recording approval releases that reviewer. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection also returns it immediately. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer.\n\n## Assistant\nDuring the five-business-day appeal window, is the original reviewer still assigned in a way that prevents taking a new review, or can they accept new reviews while answering appeal questions?\n- tool activate_skill (activate-sdcpn): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\\n\\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\\n\\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\\n\\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\\n\\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\\n\"\n- tool activate_skill (activate-elicitation): \"Run the skill named \\\"elicitation\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\\n\\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\\n\\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Work from purpose\\n\\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\\n\\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\\n\\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\\n\\n### Follow the person's account\\n\\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\\n\\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\\n\\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\\n\\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\\n\\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\\n\\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\\n\\n### Treat divergence as information\\n\\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\\n\\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\\n\\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\\n\\n### Stop honestly\\n\\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\\n\\n### Vague or compressed language\\n\\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\\n\\n### Normative language\\n\\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\\n\\n### Tension within or between accounts\\n\\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\\n\\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\\n\\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\\n\\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\\n\\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\\n\\n### Diminishing yield\\n\\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\\n\\n### Assent without independent wording\\n\\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\\n\\n### Silence and absence\\n\\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\\n\\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\\n\\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\\n\\n### Slice a concrete case\\n\\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\\n\\n### Sweep one property\\n\\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\\n\\n### Ask for the last occurrence\\n\\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\\n\\n### Ask for the basis\\n\\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\\n\\n### Ground a term or artifact\\n\\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\\n\\n### Clarify until observable\\n\\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\\n\\n### Use contrastive cases\\n\\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\\n\\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\\n\\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\\n\\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\\n\\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\\n\\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\\n\\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\\n\\n### Restate for correction\\n\\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\\n\\n### Propose structure for correction\\n\\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\\n\\n### Deposit and defer\\n\\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\\n\\n### Press without trapping\\n\\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\\n\\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\\n\\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\\n\\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\\n\\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\\n\\n### Trade concrete outcomes\\n\\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\\n\\n### Close with one correction opportunity\\n\\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\\n\\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\\n\\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\\n\\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\\n\\n### Before asking\\n\\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\\n\\n### Before recording\\n\\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\\n\\n### Before closing\\n\\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-sdcpn-elicitation.md): \"# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\\n\\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\\n\\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\\n\\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\\n\\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\\n\\n### Keep target structure backstage\\n\\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\\n\\n### Preserve operational context\\n\\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\\n\\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\\n\\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\\n\\n### Language and account signals\\n\\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\\n\\n### Operational situation patterns\\n\\n#### Timed work\\n\\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\\n\\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\\n\\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\\n\\n#### Contended resource\\n\\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\\n\\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\\n\\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\\n\\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\\n\\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\\n\\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\\n\\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\\n\\n#### Mode change\\n\\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\\n\\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\\n\\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\\n\\n#### Spatial transfer\\n\\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\\n\\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\\n\\n#### Policy under pressure\\n\\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\\n\\n#### Hidden waiting\\n\\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\\n\\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\\n\\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\\n\\n### Link the slice to the objective\\n\\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\\n\\n### Expose the process spine\\n\\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\\n\\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\\n\\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\\n\\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\\n\\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\\n\\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\\n\\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\\n\\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\\n\\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\\n\\n### Close a resource account\\n\\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\\n\\n### Close a mode change in both directions\\n\\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\\n\\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\\n\\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\\n\\n### Ask what is conserved\\n\\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\\n\\n### Establish retry scope\\n\\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\\n\\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\\n\\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\\n\\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\\n\\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\\n\\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\\n\\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\\n\\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\\n\\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\\n\\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\\n\\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\\n\\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\\n\\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\\n\\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\\n\\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\\n\\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\\n\\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\\n\\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\\n\\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\\n\\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\\n\\n### Purpose and process\\n\\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\\n\\n### Operational semantics\\n\\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\\n\\n### Quantities and context\\n\\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000024", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFGMEgxTTFKSEJNOThCTUdWMjE0MTBG", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while checking a request. Recording approval releases that reviewer. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection also returns it immediately. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1F0H1N5FFKD193V88XEPZCS", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1N432J4W3VDW93V51MH", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 3 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "elicitation" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n", + "durationMs": 1 + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "During the five-business-day appeal window, is the original reviewer still assigned in a way that prevents taking a new review, or can they accept new reviews while answering appeal questions?", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1F0H1M1TCZ0T6B4RJ0FSFWG" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.163Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.166Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.189Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.195Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1N432J4W3VDW93V51MH", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.196Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1N432J4W3VDW93V51MH", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284011993:7ho47wty1cg", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while checking a request. Recording approval releases that reviewer. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection also returns it immediately. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.196Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788284011993:7ho47wty1cg", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2113, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2113, + "totalTokens": 4237, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284011993 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1N432J4W3VDW93V51MH", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.199Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\":\"sdcpn-model", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1N432J4W3VDW93V51MH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.199Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "ling\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1N432J4W3VDW93V51MH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.199Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1N432J4W3VDW93V51MH", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 5, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284011993:7ho47wty1cg", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2113, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2113, + "totalTokens": 4237, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.201Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284011993:7ho47wty1cg", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2113, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2113, + "totalTokens": 4237, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284011993 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1N432J4W3VDW93V51MH", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.201Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1N432J4W3VDW93V51MH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.203Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284012206 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1N432J4W3VDW93V51MH", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.206Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284012206 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1N432J4W3VDW93V51MH", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.206Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 3, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1N432J4W3VDW93V51MH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.207Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1N432J4W3VDW93V51MH", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284011993:7ho47wty1cg", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2113, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2113, + "totalTokens": 4237, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284011993 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284012206 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.207Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NG7Z9GKNXF8M3C58W7", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.208Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NG7Z9GKNXF8M3C58W7", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284011993:7ho47wty1cg", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while checking a request. Recording approval releases that reviewer. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection also returns it immediately. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.208Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788284011993:7ho47wty1cg", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 1398, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 5349, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284011993 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NG7Z9GKNXF8M3C58W7", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.209Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\":\"elicitation", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NG7Z9GKNXF8M3C58W7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.210Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NG7Z9GKNXF8M3C58W7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.210Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NG7Z9GKNXF8M3C58W7", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284011993:7ho47wty1cg", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 1398, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 5349, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.211Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284011993:7ho47wty1cg", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 1398, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 5349, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284011993 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NG7Z9GKNXF8M3C58W7", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.211Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NG7Z9GKNXF8M3C58W7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.212Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284012213 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NG7Z9GKNXF8M3C58W7", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.213Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284012213 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NG7Z9GKNXF8M3C58W7", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.213Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + } + }, + "durationMs": 2, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NG7Z9GKNXF8M3C58W7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.215Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NG7Z9GKNXF8M3C58W7", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284011993:7ho47wty1cg", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 1398, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 5349, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284011993 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284012213 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.215Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NRHSJRB7RV9MZ6BBPX", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.216Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NRHSJRB7RV9MZ6BBPX", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284011993:7ho47wty1cg", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while checking a request. Recording approval releases that reviewer. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection also returns it immediately. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.216Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788284011993:7ho47wty1cg", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4349, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 2652, + "cacheWrite": 4349, + "totalTokens": 11380, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284012217 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NRHSJRB7RV9MZ6BBPX", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.217Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.f", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NRHSJRB7RV9MZ6BBPX", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.217Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "lue/packaged-ski", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NRHSJRB7RV9MZ6BBPX", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.217Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "lls/skill%3Asdcp", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NRHSJRB7RV9MZ6BBPX", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.218Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "n-modelling%3Aa63c18", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NRHSJRB7RV9MZ6BBPX", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.218Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-eli", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NRHSJRB7RV9MZ6BBPX", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.218Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "citation.md\"", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NRHSJRB7RV9MZ6BBPX", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.218Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NRHSJRB7RV9MZ6BBPX", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.218Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NRHSJRB7RV9MZ6BBPX", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 2, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284011993:7ho47wty1cg", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 4349, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 2652, + "cacheWrite": 4349, + "totalTokens": 11380, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.218Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284011993:7ho47wty1cg", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4349, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 2652, + "cacheWrite": 4349, + "totalTokens": 11380, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284012217 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NRHSJRB7RV9MZ6BBPX", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.218Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NRHSJRB7RV9MZ6BBPX", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.219Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284012221 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NRHSJRB7RV9MZ6BBPX", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.221Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284012221 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NRHSJRB7RV9MZ6BBPX", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.221Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + } + }, + "durationMs": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NRHSJRB7RV9MZ6BBPX", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.222Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NRHSJRB7RV9MZ6BBPX", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284011993:7ho47wty1cg", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4349, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 2652, + "cacheWrite": 4349, + "totalTokens": 11380, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284012217 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284012221 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.222Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NZF7V1C72BXGPXQ8T1", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.223Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NZF7V1C72BXGPXQ8T1", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284011993:7ho47wty1cg", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while checking a request. Recording approval releases that reviewer. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection also returns it immediately. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.223Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788284011993:7ho47wty1cg", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 48, + "cacheRead": 6285, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16123, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284011993 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NZF7V1C72BXGPXQ8T1", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.225Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "During the f", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NZF7V1C72BXGPXQ8T1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.228Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ive-business-day", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NZF7V1C72BXGPXQ8T1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.228Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " appeal wind", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NZF7V1C72BXGPXQ8T1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.228Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ow, is the original ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NZF7V1C72BXGPXQ8T1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.228Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "reviewer still a", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NZF7V1C72BXGPXQ8T1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.228Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ssigned in a", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NZF7V1C72BXGPXQ8T1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.228Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " way that prevents t", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NZF7V1C72BXGPXQ8T1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.228Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "aking a new revi", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NZF7V1C72BXGPXQ8T1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.228Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ew, or can t", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NZF7V1C72BXGPXQ8T1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.228Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "hey accept new revie", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NZF7V1C72BXGPXQ8T1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.228Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ws while answering a", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NZF7V1C72BXGPXQ8T1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 57, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.228Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ppeal questions?", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NZF7V1C72BXGPXQ8T1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 58, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.228Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NZF7V1C72BXGPXQ8T1", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 6, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284011993:7ho47wty1cg", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "During the five-business-day appeal window, is the original reviewer still assigned in a way that prevents taking a new review, or can they accept new reviews while answering appeal questions?" + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 48, + "cacheRead": 6285, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16123, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 59, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.229Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "During the five-business-day appeal window, is the original reviewer still assigned in a way that prevents taking a new review, or can they accept new reviews while answering appeal questions?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284011993:7ho47wty1cg", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 48, + "cacheRead": 6285, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16123, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284011993 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NZF7V1C72BXGPXQ8T1", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 60, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.229Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H1NZF7V1C72BXGPXQ8T1", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "During the five-business-day appeal window, is the original reviewer still assigned in a way that prevents taking a new review, or can they accept new reviews while answering appeal questions?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284011993:7ho47wty1cg", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 48, + "cacheRead": 6285, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16123, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284011993 + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 61, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.230Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284011993:7ho47wty1cg", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2113, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2113, + "totalTokens": 4237, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284011993 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284012206 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-elicitation", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "elicitation" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284011993:7ho47wty1cg", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1970, + "output": 10, + "cacheRead": 1398, + "cacheWrite": 1971, + "totalTokens": 5349, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284011993 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-elicitation", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"elicitation\".\n\n\n# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "elicitation" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284012213 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284011993:7ho47wty1cg", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4349, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 2652, + "cacheWrite": 4349, + "totalTokens": 11380, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284012217 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284012221 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "During the five-business-day appeal window, is the original reviewer still assigned in a way that prevents taking a new review, or can they accept new reviews while answering appeal questions?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284011993:7ho47wty1cg", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 48, + "cacheRead": 6285, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16123, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284011993 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 62, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.231Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 42, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 63, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.231Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while checking a request. Recording approval releases that reviewer. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection also returns it immediately. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H1M3PJQ3RE3FAGAMD7WC", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H1MX2ZF0G6P3RX4DKMAR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 64, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.231Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H1M1JHBM98BMGV21410F", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "fa80a7680e39846268cd0aab83520b8d5445e150a932e9d369688dd598e120a9", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 65, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.232Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "d2d42344c40ddeb2471eeeba437032079bd2c7083afdbc2f9de5e823f841d5b8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "ebec2ac5faab6cbbbe26eeeebc2d7ac0ba7dc637fd43ea9b5917f8e0277f5515", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "c7cb5b2222b0d1b5aff861c4056f41ba8825aca284ec774d8e4f0fbf12807314", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "321f8405c12374315d61caf466001d6b4b5cf68b04325df77a7948daaa680de1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/scenarios.json": "1844df940b8de9d10d28e9537f966920aba581b36956a9ac26a3767824ca96cb", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/protocol.md": "ef1443bb02c6c26d4ded6edf9e023579bc32cdc394f90490edfb34eaf32b8ed2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md": "8cd2749c8292f01045ab4282fc7248c07046cecaf14a586a9ef286e2876cf8bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md": "82b035268c07cc8ee4736b5ffdd392c8f153793d2ca6b9ed57271c9b6146de10", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md": "8826b85d32d6c24fbc8f678ec394600676ec61c4a0b83d0a9cfa16be87fc5d76", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "1a2417cc5f9649d459c5efbc87cd3242db99a9717622a6d86073c72835818865" + }, + "promptSelection": { + "candidateCorePromptIncluded": true, + "v3SdcpnAppendIncluded": true, + "legacyCorePromptIncluded": false, + "legacyRoleMarkerIncluded": false, + "initialSystemPromptSha256": "2156970b82b41d6893d08177fad8127a336be4afb5fd0bb184a52a7f63878fb8" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "candidateCorePrompt": "6a458c0bbbc9dee5b4454a54b032818227ab681ba9f7beaa60d4fe9628f6eb41", + "v3SdcpnAppend": "73cac46487d33051a90cc487ea7abfc11fec4b049af11a108396ec08d44569fb", + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/hermetic/packaged-S1.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/hermetic/packaged-S1.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f6f70bde634 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/hermetic/packaged-S1.json @@ -0,0 +1,2986 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v3-packaged-s1-bfb92bd5", + "phase": "hermetic", + "instrumentVersion": "v3", + "candidate": "packaged", + "scenarioId": "S1", + "scenario": { + "title": "Underspecified interactive request", + "prompt": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "stopAfter": "The first consequential question.", + "expected": "Ask one high-yield question in operational vocabulary after loading universal and SDCPN elicitation judgment." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [ + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "sha256": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "sha256": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf" + } + ], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 5, + "inputTokens": 1877, + "outputTokens": 11, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 1877, + "totalTokens": 3765, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 4, + "inputTokens": 2007, + "outputTokens": 31, + "cacheReadTokens": 1162, + "cacheWriteTokens": 2007, + "totalTokens": 5207, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 2, + "inputTokens": 4351, + "outputTokens": 30, + "cacheReadTokens": 2453, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4352, + "totalTokens": 11186, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 5, + "inputTokens": 4895, + "outputTokens": 32, + "cacheReadTokens": 6089, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4895, + "totalTokens": 15911, + "cost": 0 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 16, + "inputTokens": 13130, + "outputTokens": 104, + "cacheReadTokens": 9704, + "cacheWriteTokens": 13131, + "totalTokens": 36069, + "cost": 0 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nHelp me model our approval process as an SDCPN.\n\n## Assistant\nWhat decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?\n- tool activate_skill (activate-sdcpn): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\\n\\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\\n\\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\\n\\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\\n\\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-universal-elicitation.md): \"# Universal Elicitation Reference\\n\\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\\n\\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Work from purpose\\n\\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\\n\\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\\n\\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\\n\\n### Follow the person's account\\n\\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\\n\\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\\n\\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\\n\\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\\n\\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\\n\\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\\n\\n### Treat divergence as information\\n\\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\\n\\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\\n\\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\\n\\n### Stop honestly\\n\\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\\n\\n### Vague or compressed language\\n\\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\\n\\n### Normative language\\n\\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\\n\\n### Tension within or between accounts\\n\\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\\n\\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\\n\\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\\n\\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\\n\\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\\n\\n### Diminishing yield\\n\\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\\n\\n### Assent without independent wording\\n\\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\\n\\n### Silence and absence\\n\\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\\n\\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\\n\\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\\n\\n### Slice a concrete case\\n\\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\\n\\n### Sweep one property\\n\\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\\n\\n### Ask for the last occurrence\\n\\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\\n\\n### Ask for the basis\\n\\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\\n\\n### Ground a term or artifact\\n\\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\\n\\n### Clarify until observable\\n\\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\\n\\n### Use contrastive cases\\n\\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\\n\\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\\n\\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\\n\\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\\n\\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\\n\\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\\n\\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\\n\\n### Restate for correction\\n\\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\\n\\n### Propose structure for correction\\n\\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\\n\\n### Deposit and defer\\n\\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\\n\\n### Press without trapping\\n\\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\\n\\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\\n\\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\\n\\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\\n\\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\\n\\n### Trade concrete outcomes\\n\\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\\n\\n### Close with one correction opportunity\\n\\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\\n\\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\\n\\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\\n\\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\\n\\n### Before asking\\n\\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\\n\\n### Before recording\\n\\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\\n\\n### Before closing\\n\\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-sdcpn-elicitation.md): \"# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\\n\\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\\n\\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\\n\\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\\n\\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\\n\\n### Keep target structure backstage\\n\\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\\n\\n### Preserve operational context\\n\\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\\n\\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\\n\\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\\n\\n### Language and account signals\\n\\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\\n\\n### Operational situation patterns\\n\\n#### Timed work\\n\\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\\n\\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\\n\\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\\n\\n#### Contended resource\\n\\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\\n\\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\\n\\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\\n\\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\\n\\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\\n\\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\\n\\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\\n\\n#### Mode change\\n\\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\\n\\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\\n\\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\\n\\n#### Spatial transfer\\n\\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\\n\\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\\n\\n#### Policy under pressure\\n\\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\\n\\n#### Hidden waiting\\n\\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\\n\\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\\n\\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\\n\\n### Link the slice to the objective\\n\\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\\n\\n### Expose the process spine\\n\\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\\n\\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\\n\\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\\n\\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\\n\\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\\n\\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\\n\\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\\n\\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\\n\\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\\n\\n### Close a resource account\\n\\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\\n\\n### Close a mode change in both directions\\n\\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\\n\\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\\n\\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\\n\\n### Ask what is conserved\\n\\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\\n\\n### Establish retry scope\\n\\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\\n\\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\\n\\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\\n\\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\\n\\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\\n\\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\\n\\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\\n\\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\\n\\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\\n\\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\\n\\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\\n\\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\\n\\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\\n\\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\\n\\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\\n\\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\\n\\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\\n\\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\\n\\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\\n\\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\\n\\n### Purpose and process\\n\\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\\n\\n### Operational semantics\\n\\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\\n\\n### Quantities and context\\n\\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000024", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFGMEgyNkRHM0FLM0JDSzNTN0oyODhD", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1F0H27E4SEPPRCQ5TYJ4KPH", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H27CVFJ2N0AGH62P9F71", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 4 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1F0H26EDMD8RRGDB263EBEX" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.751Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.754Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.774Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.780Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H27CVFJ2N0AGH62P9F71", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.780Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H27CVFJ2N0AGH62P9F71", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284012578:uingerm0fib", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.780Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788284012578:uingerm0fib", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1877, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 1877, + "totalTokens": 3765, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284012578 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H27CVFJ2N0AGH62P9F71", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.783Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\":\"sdc", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H27CVFJ2N0AGH62P9F71", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.783Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "pn-modelling\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H27CVFJ2N0AGH62P9F71", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.783Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H27CVFJ2N0AGH62P9F71", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 5, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284012578:uingerm0fib", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 1877, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 1877, + "totalTokens": 3765, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.785Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284012578:uingerm0fib", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1877, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 1877, + "totalTokens": 3765, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284012578 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H27CVFJ2N0AGH62P9F71", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.785Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H27CVFJ2N0AGH62P9F71", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.787Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284012790 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H27CVFJ2N0AGH62P9F71", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.790Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284012790 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H27CVFJ2N0AGH62P9F71", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.790Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 4, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H27CVFJ2N0AGH62P9F71", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.792Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H27CVFJ2N0AGH62P9F71", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284012578:uingerm0fib", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1877, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 1877, + "totalTokens": 3765, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284012578 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284012790 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.792Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H27S3M6DV8DTDQX5X2MT", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.793Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H27S3M6DV8DTDQX5X2MT", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284012578:uingerm0fib", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.793Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788284012578:uingerm0fib", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 1162, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 5207, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284012794 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H27S3M6DV8DTDQX5X2MT", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.795Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.flue/pack", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H27S3M6DV8DTDQX5X2MT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.795Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "aged-skills/skil", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H27S3M6DV8DTDQX5X2MT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.795Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "l%3Asdcpn-modelling%", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H27S3M6DV8DTDQX5X2MT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.796Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "3A895714f964", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H27S3M6DV8DTDQX5X2MT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.796Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "83ea31/unive", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H27S3M6DV8DTDQX5X2MT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.796Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "rsal-elicitation", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H27S3M6DV8DTDQX5X2MT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.796Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": ".md\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H27S3M6DV8DTDQX5X2MT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.796Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H27S3M6DV8DTDQX5X2MT", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284012578:uingerm0fib", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 1162, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 5207, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.797Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284012578:uingerm0fib", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 1162, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 5207, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284012794 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H27S3M6DV8DTDQX5X2MT", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.797Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H27S3M6DV8DTDQX5X2MT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.797Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284012799 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H27S3M6DV8DTDQX5X2MT", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.799Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284012799 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H27S3M6DV8DTDQX5X2MT", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.799Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + } + }, + "durationMs": 2, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H27S3M6DV8DTDQX5X2MT", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.800Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H27S3M6DV8DTDQX5X2MT", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284012578:uingerm0fib", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 1162, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 5207, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284012794 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284012799 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.801Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H281E5G260PNSJ1TKX1S", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.801Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H281E5G260PNSJ1TKX1S", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284012578:uingerm0fib", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.802Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788284012578:uingerm0fib", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4351, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 2453, + "cacheWrite": 4352, + "totalTokens": 11186, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284012802 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H281E5G260PNSJ1TKX1S", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.803Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.f", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H281E5G260PNSJ1TKX1S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.803Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "lue/packaged-skills/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H281E5G260PNSJ1TKX1S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.803Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "skill%3Asdcp", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H281E5G260PNSJ1TKX1S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.803Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "n-modelling%3A89", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H281E5G260PNSJ1TKX1S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.803Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "5714f96483ea31/s", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H281E5G260PNSJ1TKX1S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.803Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "dcpn-elicita", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H281E5G260PNSJ1TKX1S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.803Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "tion.md\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H281E5G260PNSJ1TKX1S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.803Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H281E5G260PNSJ1TKX1S", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 2, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284012578:uingerm0fib", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 4351, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 2453, + "cacheWrite": 4352, + "totalTokens": 11186, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.804Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284012578:uingerm0fib", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4351, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 2453, + "cacheWrite": 4352, + "totalTokens": 11186, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284012802 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H281E5G260PNSJ1TKX1S", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.804Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H281E5G260PNSJ1TKX1S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.804Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284012807 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H281E5G260PNSJ1TKX1S", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.807Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284012807 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H281E5G260PNSJ1TKX1S", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.807Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + } + }, + "durationMs": 2, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H281E5G260PNSJ1TKX1S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.808Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H281E5G260PNSJ1TKX1S", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284012578:uingerm0fib", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4351, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 2453, + "cacheWrite": 4352, + "totalTokens": 11186, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284012802 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284012807 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.808Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2899C9G0GMFT09NH8GB", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.809Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2899C9G0GMFT09NH8GB", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284012578:uingerm0fib", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.809Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788284012578:uingerm0fib", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 32, + "cacheRead": 6089, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 15911, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284012578 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2899C9G0GMFT09NH8GB", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.811Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "What decision should", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2899C9G0GMFT09NH8GB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.814Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " this model ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2899C9G0GMFT09NH8GB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.814Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "support, and can you", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2899C9G0GMFT09NH8GB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.814Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " walk me through", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2899C9G0GMFT09NH8GB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.814Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " the last ap", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2899C9G0GMFT09NH8GB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.814Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "proval request f", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2899C9G0GMFT09NH8GB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 57, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.814Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "rom submissi", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2899C9G0GMFT09NH8GB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 58, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.814Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "on to its ou", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2899C9G0GMFT09NH8GB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 59, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.814Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "tcome?", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2899C9G0GMFT09NH8GB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 60, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.814Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2899C9G0GMFT09NH8GB", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 5, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284012578:uingerm0fib", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?" + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 32, + "cacheRead": 6089, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 15911, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 61, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.814Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284012578:uingerm0fib", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 32, + "cacheRead": 6089, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 15911, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284012578 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2899C9G0GMFT09NH8GB", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 62, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.814Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2899C9G0GMFT09NH8GB", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284012578:uingerm0fib", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 32, + "cacheRead": 6089, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 15911, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284012578 + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 63, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.816Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284012578:uingerm0fib", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 1877, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 1877, + "totalTokens": 3765, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284012578 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284012790 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284012578:uingerm0fib", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 1162, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 5207, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284012794 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284012799 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284012578:uingerm0fib", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4351, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 2453, + "cacheWrite": 4352, + "totalTokens": 11186, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284012802 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284012807 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "What decision should this model support, and can you walk me through the last approval request from submission to its outcome?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284012578:uingerm0fib", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 32, + "cacheRead": 6089, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 15911, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284012578 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 64, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.816Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 43, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 65, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.817Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H26G3KWVVZG8GD8BHJYS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2762CMQF7GGNG6ZEWJS", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 66, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.817Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H26DG3AK3BCK3S7J288C", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "bc02c595391a14fc0baf64dde7d49429448257fa9f31b3a534d60c6355836961", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 67, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:32.817Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "d2d42344c40ddeb2471eeeba437032079bd2c7083afdbc2f9de5e823f841d5b8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "ebec2ac5faab6cbbbe26eeeebc2d7ac0ba7dc637fd43ea9b5917f8e0277f5515", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "c7cb5b2222b0d1b5aff861c4056f41ba8825aca284ec774d8e4f0fbf12807314", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "321f8405c12374315d61caf466001d6b4b5cf68b04325df77a7948daaa680de1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/scenarios.json": "1844df940b8de9d10d28e9537f966920aba581b36956a9ac26a3767824ca96cb", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/protocol.md": "ef1443bb02c6c26d4ded6edf9e023579bc32cdc394f90490edfb34eaf32b8ed2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md": "8cd2749c8292f01045ab4282fc7248c07046cecaf14a586a9ef286e2876cf8bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md": "82b035268c07cc8ee4736b5ffdd392c8f153793d2ca6b9ed57271c9b6146de10", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md": "8826b85d32d6c24fbc8f678ec394600676ec61c4a0b83d0a9cfa16be87fc5d76", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "1a2417cc5f9649d459c5efbc87cd3242db99a9717622a6d86073c72835818865" + }, + "promptSelection": { + "candidateCorePromptIncluded": true, + "v3SdcpnAppendIncluded": true, + "legacyCorePromptIncluded": false, + "legacyRoleMarkerIncluded": false, + "initialSystemPromptSha256": "ad472c3919f1857f1f5f02f83bf0adb83c4795808e44f2b58813b158585b61f7" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "candidateCorePrompt": "6a458c0bbbc9dee5b4454a54b032818227ab681ba9f7beaa60d4fe9628f6eb41", + "v3SdcpnAppend": "73cac46487d33051a90cc487ea7abfc11fec4b049af11a108396ec08d44569fb", + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/hermetic/packaged-S2.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/hermetic/packaged-S2.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..652d2ab8d33 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/hermetic/packaged-S2.json @@ -0,0 +1,3012 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v3-packaged-s2-3336f483", + "phase": "hermetic", + "instrumentVersion": "v3", + "candidate": "packaged", + "scenarioId": "S2", + "scenario": { + "title": "Adequate construct-only request", + "prompt": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them.", + "stopAfter": "The first consequential construction decision.", + "expected": "Enter construction guidance without loading universal elicitation or asking a question." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome.", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + }, + "output": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + }, + "output": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [ + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "sha256": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694" + }, + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md", + "sha256": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5" + } + ], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 3, + "inputTokens": 2166, + "outputTokens": 11, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 2166, + "totalTokens": 4343, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3, + "inputTokens": 2007, + "outputTokens": 29, + "cacheReadTokens": 1451, + "cacheWriteTokens": 2007, + "totalTokens": 5494, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 2, + "inputTokens": 3142, + "outputTokens": 27, + "cacheReadTokens": 2742, + "cacheWriteTokens": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9053, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 4, + "inputTokens": 2000, + "outputTokens": 46, + "cacheReadTokens": 5168, + "cacheWriteTokens": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9214, + "cost": 0 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 12, + "inputTokens": 9315, + "outputTokens": 113, + "cacheReadTokens": 9361, + "cacheWriteTokens": 9315, + "totalTokens": 28104, + "cost": 0 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nUse the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them.\n\n## Assistant\nFirst, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome.\n- tool activate_skill (activate-sdcpn): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\\n\\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\\n\\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\\n\\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\\n\\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-pn-construction.md): \"# SDCPN Construction\\n\\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\\n\\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\\n\\n## Construction boundary\\n\\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\\n\\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\\n\\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\\n\\n## Mapping principles\\n\\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\\n| --- | --- |\\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\\n\\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\\n\\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\\n\\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\\n\\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\\n\\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\\n\\n## Construction patterns\\n\\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\\n\\n### Timed work\\n\\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\\n\\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\\n\\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\\n\\n### Contended resource\\n\\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\\n\\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\\n\\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\\n\\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\\n\\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\\n\\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\\n\\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\\n\\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\\n\\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\\n\\n### Mode change\\n\\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\\n\\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\\n\\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\\n\\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\\n\\n### Spatial transfer\\n\\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\\n\\n### Hidden waiting\\n\\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\\n\\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\\n\\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\\n\\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\\n\\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\\n\\nNot acceptable:\\n\\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\\n\\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\\n\\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\\n\\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\\n\\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\\n\\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-checks.md): \"# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\\n\\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\\n\\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\\n\\n## Before construction\\n\\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\\n\\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\\n\\n## During construction\\n\\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\\n\\n## Structural validity\\n\\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\\n\\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\\n\\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\\n\\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\\n\\n## Existing-net revision\\n\\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\\n\\n## Delivery\\n\\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\\n\\nState plainly:\\n\\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\\n\\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000024", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFGMEgyUkpLTlY5WVBRNjhON0EwTk0y", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1F0H2SM8Z8WDSFF6RY1PFRE", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2SJKHSR0BX5PD3KV7WE", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 4 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + }, + "output": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + }, + "output": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1F0H2RK88289GQ0WC317Q36" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.333Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.336Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.356Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.362Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2SJKHSR0BX5PD3KV7WE", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.362Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2SJKHSR0BX5PD3KV7WE", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284013160:8p4wyxwf8fs", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.363Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788284013160:8p4wyxwf8fs", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2166, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2166, + "totalTokens": 4343, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284013161 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2SJKHSR0BX5PD3KV7WE", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.365Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\":\"sdc", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2SJKHSR0BX5PD3KV7WE", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.365Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "pn-modelling\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2SJKHSR0BX5PD3KV7WE", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.365Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2SJKHSR0BX5PD3KV7WE", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284013160:8p4wyxwf8fs", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2166, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2166, + "totalTokens": 4343, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.366Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284013160:8p4wyxwf8fs", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2166, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2166, + "totalTokens": 4343, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284013161 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2SJKHSR0BX5PD3KV7WE", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.367Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2SJKHSR0BX5PD3KV7WE", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.369Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284013372 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2SJKHSR0BX5PD3KV7WE", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.372Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284013372 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2SJKHSR0BX5PD3KV7WE", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.372Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 4, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2SJKHSR0BX5PD3KV7WE", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.373Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2SJKHSR0BX5PD3KV7WE", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284013160:8p4wyxwf8fs", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2166, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2166, + "totalTokens": 4343, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284013161 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284013372 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.373Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2SZP3EK6Y4HZ7SGA7EY", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.375Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2SZP3EK6Y4HZ7SGA7EY", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284013160:8p4wyxwf8fs", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.375Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788284013160:8p4wyxwf8fs", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 1451, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 5494, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284013376 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2SZP3EK6Y4HZ7SGA7EY", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.376Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.f", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2SZP3EK6Y4HZ7SGA7EY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.377Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "lue/packaged-skills/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2SZP3EK6Y4HZ7SGA7EY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.377Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "skill%3Asdcpn-modell", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2SZP3EK6Y4HZ7SGA7EY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.377Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "ing%3A895714f964", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2SZP3EK6Y4HZ7SGA7EY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.377Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "83ea31/pn-constructi", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2SZP3EK6Y4HZ7SGA7EY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.377Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "on.md\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2SZP3EK6Y4HZ7SGA7EY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.377Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2SZP3EK6Y4HZ7SGA7EY", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284013160:8p4wyxwf8fs", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 1451, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 5494, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.378Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284013160:8p4wyxwf8fs", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 1451, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 5494, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284013376 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2SZP3EK6Y4HZ7SGA7EY", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.378Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2SZP3EK6Y4HZ7SGA7EY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.379Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284013380 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2SZP3EK6Y4HZ7SGA7EY", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.380Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284013380 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2SZP3EK6Y4HZ7SGA7EY", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.380Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + } + }, + "durationMs": 2, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2SZP3EK6Y4HZ7SGA7EY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.381Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2SZP3EK6Y4HZ7SGA7EY", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284013160:8p4wyxwf8fs", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 1451, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 5494, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284013376 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284013380 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.381Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2T6FPDSJSPQEQVN5WSN", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.382Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2T6FPDSJSPQEQVN5WSN", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284013160:8p4wyxwf8fs", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.382Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788284013160:8p4wyxwf8fs", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 2742, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9053, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284013383 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2T6FPDSJSPQEQVN5WSN", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.383Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.f", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2T6FPDSJSPQEQVN5WSN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.383Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "lue/packaged-skills/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2T6FPDSJSPQEQVN5WSN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.383Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "skill%3Asdcp", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2T6FPDSJSPQEQVN5WSN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.384Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "n-modelling%3A895714", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2T6FPDSJSPQEQVN5WSN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.384Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "f96483ea31/checks.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2T6FPDSJSPQEQVN5WSN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.384Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2T6FPDSJSPQEQVN5WSN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.384Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2T6FPDSJSPQEQVN5WSN", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 2, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284013160:8p4wyxwf8fs", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 2742, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9053, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.384Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284013160:8p4wyxwf8fs", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 2742, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9053, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284013383 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2T6FPDSJSPQEQVN5WSN", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.384Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2T6FPDSJSPQEQVN5WSN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.385Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284013386 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2T6FPDSJSPQEQVN5WSN", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.386Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284013386 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2T6FPDSJSPQEQVN5WSN", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.386Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + } + }, + "durationMs": 2, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2T6FPDSJSPQEQVN5WSN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.387Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2T6FPDSJSPQEQVN5WSN", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284013160:8p4wyxwf8fs", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 2742, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9053, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284013383 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284013386 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.387Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2TC7QDQD2TK18XKE79C", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.388Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2TC7QDQD2TK18XKE79C", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284013160:8p4wyxwf8fs", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.388Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788284013160:8p4wyxwf8fs", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 46, + "cacheRead": 5168, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9214, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284013161 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2TC7QDQD2TK18XKE79C", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.389Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "First, facto", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2TC7QDQD2TK18XKE79C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.391Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "r the timed ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2TC7QDQD2TK18XKE79C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.391Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "review into star", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2TC7QDQD2TK18XKE79C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.391Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "t, in-progress, appr", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2TC7QDQD2TK18XKE79C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.391Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "oval, and re", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2TC7QDQD2TK18XKE79C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.391Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "jection transiti", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2TC7QDQD2TK18XKE79C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.391Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ons so the r", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2TC7QDQD2TK18XKE79C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.391Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "eviewer toke", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2TC7QDQD2TK18XKE79C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 57, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.391Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "n is reserve", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2TC7QDQD2TK18XKE79C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 58, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.391Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "d during the 20-minu", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2TC7QDQD2TK18XKE79C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 59, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.391Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "te check and returne", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2TC7QDQD2TK18XKE79C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 60, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.391Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "d on either outc", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2TC7QDQD2TK18XKE79C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 61, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.391Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ome.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2TC7QDQD2TK18XKE79C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 62, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.391Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2TC7QDQD2TK18XKE79C", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284013160:8p4wyxwf8fs", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome." + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 46, + "cacheRead": 5168, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9214, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 63, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.392Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284013160:8p4wyxwf8fs", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 46, + "cacheRead": 5168, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9214, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284013161 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2TC7QDQD2TK18XKE79C", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 64, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.392Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H2TC7QDQD2TK18XKE79C", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284013160:8p4wyxwf8fs", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 46, + "cacheRead": 5168, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9214, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284013161 + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 65, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.393Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284013160:8p4wyxwf8fs", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2166, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2166, + "totalTokens": 4343, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284013161 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284013372 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284013160:8p4wyxwf8fs", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 1451, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 5494, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284013376 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284013380 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284013160:8p4wyxwf8fs", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 2742, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 9053, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284013383 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284013386 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "First, factor the timed review into start, in-progress, approval, and rejection transitions so the reviewer token is reserved during the 20-minute check and returned on either outcome." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284013160:8p4wyxwf8fs", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 46, + "cacheRead": 5168, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9214, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284013161 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 66, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.394Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 38, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 67, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.394Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H2RNEAH33GB5VCWE736F", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H2SCYSP0WTBEF3WH7NMC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 68, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.394Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H2RJKNV9YPQ68N7A0NM2", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "d85c5df8b129b3e5de7bfb12454246359eee53fd1e2724e03aecc39e49201f4f", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 69, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.394Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "d2d42344c40ddeb2471eeeba437032079bd2c7083afdbc2f9de5e823f841d5b8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "ebec2ac5faab6cbbbe26eeeebc2d7ac0ba7dc637fd43ea9b5917f8e0277f5515", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "c7cb5b2222b0d1b5aff861c4056f41ba8825aca284ec774d8e4f0fbf12807314", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "321f8405c12374315d61caf466001d6b4b5cf68b04325df77a7948daaa680de1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/scenarios.json": "1844df940b8de9d10d28e9537f966920aba581b36956a9ac26a3767824ca96cb", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/protocol.md": "ef1443bb02c6c26d4ded6edf9e023579bc32cdc394f90490edfb34eaf32b8ed2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md": "8cd2749c8292f01045ab4282fc7248c07046cecaf14a586a9ef286e2876cf8bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md": "82b035268c07cc8ee4736b5ffdd392c8f153793d2ca6b9ed57271c9b6146de10", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md": "8826b85d32d6c24fbc8f678ec394600676ec61c4a0b83d0a9cfa16be87fc5d76", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "1a2417cc5f9649d459c5efbc87cd3242db99a9717622a6d86073c72835818865" + }, + "promptSelection": { + "candidateCorePromptIncluded": true, + "v3SdcpnAppendIncluded": true, + "legacyCorePromptIncluded": false, + "legacyRoleMarkerIncluded": false, + "initialSystemPromptSha256": "ad472c3919f1857f1f5f02f83bf0adb83c4795808e44f2b58813b158585b61f7" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "candidateCorePrompt": "6a458c0bbbc9dee5b4454a54b032818227ab681ba9f7beaa60d4fe9628f6eb41", + "v3SdcpnAppend": "73cac46487d33051a90cc487ea7abfc11fec4b049af11a108396ec08d44569fb", + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/hermetic/packaged-S3.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/hermetic/packaged-S3.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..475b49b827c --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/hermetic/packaged-S3.json @@ -0,0 +1,2982 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v3-packaged-s3-b934a772", + "phase": "hermetic", + "instrumentVersion": "v3", + "candidate": "packaged", + "scenarioId": "S3", + "scenario": { + "title": "Review with a resolvable target defect", + "prompt": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token.", + "stopAfter": "The first supported defect finding.", + "expected": "Identify the missing reviewer return on rejection without loading universal elicitation." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer.", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + }, + "output": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + }, + "output": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [ + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "sha256": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694" + }, + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md", + "sha256": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5" + } + ], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 5, + "inputTokens": 2039, + "outputTokens": 11, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 2039, + "totalTokens": 4089, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 4, + "inputTokens": 2007, + "outputTokens": 29, + "cacheReadTokens": 1323, + "cacheWriteTokens": 2007, + "totalTokens": 5366, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 2, + "inputTokens": 3142, + "outputTokens": 27, + "cacheReadTokens": 2614, + "cacheWriteTokens": 3142, + "totalTokens": 8925, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 4, + "inputTokens": 2000, + "outputTokens": 45, + "cacheReadTokens": 5040, + "cacheWriteTokens": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9085, + "cost": 0 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 15, + "inputTokens": 9188, + "outputTokens": 112, + "cacheReadTokens": 8977, + "cacheWriteTokens": 9188, + "totalTokens": 27465, + "cost": 0 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nReview the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token.\n\n## Assistant\nThe rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer.\n- tool activate_skill (activate-sdcpn): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\\n\\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\\n\\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\\n\\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\\n\\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-pn-construction.md): \"# SDCPN Construction\\n\\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\\n\\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\\n\\n## Construction boundary\\n\\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\\n\\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\\n\\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\\n\\n## Mapping principles\\n\\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\\n| --- | --- |\\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\\n\\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\\n\\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\\n\\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\\n\\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\\n\\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\\n\\n## Construction patterns\\n\\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\\n\\n### Timed work\\n\\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\\n\\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\\n\\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\\n\\n### Contended resource\\n\\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\\n\\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\\n\\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\\n\\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\\n\\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\\n\\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\\n\\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\\n\\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\\n\\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\\n\\n### Mode change\\n\\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\\n\\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\\n\\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\\n\\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\\n\\n### Spatial transfer\\n\\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\\n\\n### Hidden waiting\\n\\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\\n\\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\\n\\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\\n\\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\\n\\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\\n\\nNot acceptable:\\n\\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\\n\\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\\n\\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\\n\\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\\n\\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\\n\\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-checks.md): \"# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\\n\\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\\n\\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\\n\\n## Before construction\\n\\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\\n\\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\\n\\n## During construction\\n\\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\\n\\n## Structural validity\\n\\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\\n\\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\\n\\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\\n\\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\\n\\n## Existing-net revision\\n\\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\\n\\n## Delivery\\n\\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\\n\\nState plainly:\\n\\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\\n\\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000024", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFGMEgzQThaUEdUM1NHRVBSRDROOFE4", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1F0H3B9P4NNMVJ1Z8VN0MQC", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3B7NG86C07ZQT5EGYM6", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 4 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + }, + "output": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + }, + "output": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n", + "durationMs": 1 + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1F0H3A9VKSRSN4KTFPKQB75" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.898Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.901Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.921Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.927Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3B7NG86C07ZQT5EGYM6", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.927Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3B7NG86C07ZQT5EGYM6", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284013729:jdfka56ahxt", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.927Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788284013729:jdfka56ahxt", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2039, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2039, + "totalTokens": 4089, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284013729 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3B7NG86C07ZQT5EGYM6", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.929Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\":\"sdcpn-model", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3B7NG86C07ZQT5EGYM6", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.929Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "ling\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3B7NG86C07ZQT5EGYM6", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.930Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3B7NG86C07ZQT5EGYM6", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 5, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284013729:jdfka56ahxt", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2039, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2039, + "totalTokens": 4089, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.932Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284013729:jdfka56ahxt", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2039, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2039, + "totalTokens": 4089, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284013729 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3B7NG86C07ZQT5EGYM6", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.932Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3B7NG86C07ZQT5EGYM6", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.935Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284013937 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3B7NG86C07ZQT5EGYM6", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.937Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284013937 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3B7NG86C07ZQT5EGYM6", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.937Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 4, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3B7NG86C07ZQT5EGYM6", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.939Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3B7NG86C07ZQT5EGYM6", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284013729:jdfka56ahxt", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2039, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2039, + "totalTokens": 4089, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284013729 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284013937 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.939Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3BMJCR34X8SBSKMKHWJ", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.940Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3BMJCR34X8SBSKMKHWJ", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284013729:jdfka56ahxt", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.940Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788284013729:jdfka56ahxt", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 1323, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 5366, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284013941 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3BMJCR34X8SBSKMKHWJ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.942Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.flue/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3BMJCR34X8SBSKMKHWJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.943Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "packaged-skills/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3BMJCR34X8SBSKMKHWJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.943Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "skill%3Asdcp", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3BMJCR34X8SBSKMKHWJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.943Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "n-modelling%3A895714", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3BMJCR34X8SBSKMKHWJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.943Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "f96483ea31/pn-constr", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3BMJCR34X8SBSKMKHWJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.943Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "uction.md\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3BMJCR34X8SBSKMKHWJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.943Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3BMJCR34X8SBSKMKHWJ", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284013729:jdfka56ahxt", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 1323, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 5366, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.944Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284013729:jdfka56ahxt", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 1323, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 5366, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284013941 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3BMJCR34X8SBSKMKHWJ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.944Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3BMJCR34X8SBSKMKHWJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.945Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284013946 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3BMJCR34X8SBSKMKHWJ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.946Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284013946 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3BMJCR34X8SBSKMKHWJ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.946Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + } + }, + "durationMs": 2, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3BMJCR34X8SBSKMKHWJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.947Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3BMJCR34X8SBSKMKHWJ", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284013729:jdfka56ahxt", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 1323, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 5366, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284013941 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284013946 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.947Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3BWYKZ92QE1K80PV69R", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.948Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3BWYKZ92QE1K80PV69R", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284013729:jdfka56ahxt", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.948Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788284013729:jdfka56ahxt", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 2614, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 8925, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284013949 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3BWYKZ92QE1K80PV69R", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.949Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.flue/pack", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3BWYKZ92QE1K80PV69R", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.949Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "aged-skills/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3BWYKZ92QE1K80PV69R", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.950Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "skill%3Asdcp", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3BWYKZ92QE1K80PV69R", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.950Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "n-modelling%3A89", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3BWYKZ92QE1K80PV69R", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.950Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "5714f96483ea31/c", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3BWYKZ92QE1K80PV69R", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.950Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "hecks.md\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3BWYKZ92QE1K80PV69R", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.950Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3BWYKZ92QE1K80PV69R", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 2, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284013729:jdfka56ahxt", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 2614, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 8925, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.950Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284013729:jdfka56ahxt", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 2614, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 8925, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284013949 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3BWYKZ92QE1K80PV69R", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.950Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3BWYKZ92QE1K80PV69R", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.951Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284013952 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3BWYKZ92QE1K80PV69R", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.952Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284013952 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3BWYKZ92QE1K80PV69R", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.952Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + } + }, + "durationMs": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3BWYKZ92QE1K80PV69R", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.953Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3BWYKZ92QE1K80PV69R", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284013729:jdfka56ahxt", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 2614, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 8925, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284013949 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284013952 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.953Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3C2V6PD1G814YQ6XYKN", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.954Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3C2V6PD1G814YQ6XYKN", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284013729:jdfka56ahxt", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.954Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788284013729:jdfka56ahxt", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 45, + "cacheRead": 5040, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9085, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284013729 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3C2V6PD1G814YQ6XYKN", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.955Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "The rejection pa", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3C2V6PD1G814YQ6XYKN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.957Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "th leaks the reusabl", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3C2V6PD1G814YQ6XYKN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.957Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "e reviewer token: th", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3C2V6PD1G814YQ6XYKN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.957Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "e account re", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3C2V6PD1G814YQ6XYKN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.957Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "quires release after", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3C2V6PD1G814YQ6XYKN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.957Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " either outcome,", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3C2V6PD1G814YQ6XYKN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.957Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " but RecordRejec", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3C2V6PD1G814YQ6XYKN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.957Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "tion has no ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3C2V6PD1G814YQ6XYKN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 57, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.957Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "output arc returning", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3C2V6PD1G814YQ6XYKN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 58, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.957Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " it to Available", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3C2V6PD1G814YQ6XYKN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 59, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.957Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "Reviewer.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3C2V6PD1G814YQ6XYKN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 60, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.957Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3C2V6PD1G814YQ6XYKN", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284013729:jdfka56ahxt", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer." + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 45, + "cacheRead": 5040, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9085, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 61, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.958Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284013729:jdfka56ahxt", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 45, + "cacheRead": 5040, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9085, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284013729 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3C2V6PD1G814YQ6XYKN", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 62, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.958Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3C2V6PD1G814YQ6XYKN", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284013729:jdfka56ahxt", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 45, + "cacheRead": 5040, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9085, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284013729 + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 63, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.959Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284013729:jdfka56ahxt", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2039, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2039, + "totalTokens": 4089, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284013729 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284013937 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-pn-construction.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284013729:jdfka56ahxt", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 29, + "cacheRead": 1323, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 5366, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284013941 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-pn-construction.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284013946 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-checks.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284013729:jdfka56ahxt", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3142, + "output": 27, + "cacheRead": 2614, + "cacheWrite": 3142, + "totalTokens": 8925, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284013949 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-checks.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284013952 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "The rejection path leaks the reusable reviewer token: the account requires release after either outcome, but RecordRejection has no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer." + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284013729:jdfka56ahxt", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2000, + "output": 45, + "cacheRead": 5040, + "cacheWrite": 2000, + "totalTokens": 9085, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284013729 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 64, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.960Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 39, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 65, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.960Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3ABRWVXADYMW24CZ9MM", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3B1VMKXJAVAFBW62QNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 66, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.960Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3A8ZPGT3SGEPRD4N8Q8", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "88f8f6ebb81048e23ef199ada978742636353c7074e08a504db552b036c2c866", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 67, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:33.961Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "d2d42344c40ddeb2471eeeba437032079bd2c7083afdbc2f9de5e823f841d5b8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "ebec2ac5faab6cbbbe26eeeebc2d7ac0ba7dc637fd43ea9b5917f8e0277f5515", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "c7cb5b2222b0d1b5aff861c4056f41ba8825aca284ec774d8e4f0fbf12807314", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "321f8405c12374315d61caf466001d6b4b5cf68b04325df77a7948daaa680de1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/scenarios.json": "1844df940b8de9d10d28e9537f966920aba581b36956a9ac26a3767824ca96cb", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/protocol.md": "ef1443bb02c6c26d4ded6edf9e023579bc32cdc394f90490edfb34eaf32b8ed2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md": "8cd2749c8292f01045ab4282fc7248c07046cecaf14a586a9ef286e2876cf8bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md": "82b035268c07cc8ee4736b5ffdd392c8f153793d2ca6b9ed57271c9b6146de10", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md": "8826b85d32d6c24fbc8f678ec394600676ec61c4a0b83d0a9cfa16be87fc5d76", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "1a2417cc5f9649d459c5efbc87cd3242db99a9717622a6d86073c72835818865" + }, + "promptSelection": { + "candidateCorePromptIncluded": true, + "v3SdcpnAppendIncluded": true, + "legacyCorePromptIncluded": false, + "legacyRoleMarkerIncluded": false, + "initialSystemPromptSha256": "ad472c3919f1857f1f5f02f83bf0adb83c4795808e44f2b58813b158585b61f7" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "candidateCorePrompt": "6a458c0bbbc9dee5b4454a54b032818227ab681ba9f7beaa60d4fe9628f6eb41", + "v3SdcpnAppend": "73cac46487d33051a90cc487ea7abfc11fec4b049af11a108396ec08d44569fb", + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/hermetic/packaged-S4.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/hermetic/packaged-S4.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..eb088b7776e --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/hermetic/packaged-S4.json @@ -0,0 +1,2997 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v3-packaged-s4-7910bb7a", + "phase": "hermetic", + "instrumentVersion": "v3", + "candidate": "packaged", + "scenarioId": "S4", + "scenario": { + "title": "Review exposing an implicit human-knowledge gap", + "prompt": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while checking a request. Recording approval releases that reviewer. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection also returns it immediately. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer.", + "stopAfter": "One focused question exposing the unresolved appeal and reviewer-availability relationship.", + "expected": "Load universal and SDCPN elicitation judgment, then ask whether appeal responsibility keeps the original reviewer unavailable for new reviews or permits concurrent assignment." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "During the five-business-day appeal window, is the original reviewer still assigned in a way that prevents taking a new review, or can they accept new reviews while answering appeal questions?", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [ + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "sha256": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "sha256": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf" + } + ], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 5, + "inputTokens": 2046, + "outputTokens": 11, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 2046, + "totalTokens": 4103, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3, + "inputTokens": 2007, + "outputTokens": 31, + "cacheReadTokens": 1330, + "cacheWriteTokens": 2007, + "totalTokens": 5375, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3, + "inputTokens": 4352, + "outputTokens": 30, + "cacheReadTokens": 2621, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4352, + "totalTokens": 11355, + "cost": 0 + }, + { + "durationMs": 5, + "inputTokens": 4895, + "outputTokens": 48, + "cacheReadTokens": 6257, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16095, + "cost": 0 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 16, + "inputTokens": 13300, + "outputTokens": 120, + "cacheReadTokens": 10208, + "cacheWriteTokens": 13300, + "totalTokens": 36928, + "cost": 0 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nReview the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while checking a request. Recording approval releases that reviewer. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection also returns it immediately. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer.\n\n## Assistant\nDuring the five-business-day appeal window, is the original reviewer still assigned in a way that prevents taking a new review, or can they accept new reviews while answering appeal questions?\n- tool activate_skill (activate-sdcpn): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\\n\\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\\n\\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\\n\\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\\n\\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-universal-elicitation.md): \"# Universal Elicitation Reference\\n\\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\\n\\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Work from purpose\\n\\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\\n\\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\\n\\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\\n\\n### Follow the person's account\\n\\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\\n\\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\\n\\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\\n\\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\\n\\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\\n\\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\\n\\n### Treat divergence as information\\n\\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\\n\\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\\n\\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\\n\\n### Stop honestly\\n\\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\\n\\n### Vague or compressed language\\n\\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\\n\\n### Normative language\\n\\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\\n\\n### Tension within or between accounts\\n\\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\\n\\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\\n\\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\\n\\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\\n\\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\\n\\n### Diminishing yield\\n\\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\\n\\n### Assent without independent wording\\n\\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\\n\\n### Silence and absence\\n\\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\\n\\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\\n\\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\\n\\n### Slice a concrete case\\n\\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\\n\\n### Sweep one property\\n\\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\\n\\n### Ask for the last occurrence\\n\\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\\n\\n### Ask for the basis\\n\\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\\n\\n### Ground a term or artifact\\n\\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\\n\\n### Clarify until observable\\n\\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\\n\\n### Use contrastive cases\\n\\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\\n\\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\\n\\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\\n\\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\\n\\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\\n\\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\\n\\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\\n\\n### Restate for correction\\n\\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\\n\\n### Propose structure for correction\\n\\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\\n\\n### Deposit and defer\\n\\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\\n\\n### Press without trapping\\n\\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\\n\\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\\n\\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\\n\\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\\n\\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\\n\\n### Trade concrete outcomes\\n\\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\\n\\n### Close with one correction opportunity\\n\\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\\n\\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\\n\\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\\n\\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\\n\\n### Before asking\\n\\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\\n\\n### Before recording\\n\\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\\n\\n### Before closing\\n\\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (read-sdcpn-elicitation.md): \"# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\\n\\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\\n\\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\\n\\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\\n\\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\\n\\n### Keep target structure backstage\\n\\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\\n\\n### Preserve operational context\\n\\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\\n\\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\\n\\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\\n\\n### Language and account signals\\n\\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\\n\\n### Operational situation patterns\\n\\n#### Timed work\\n\\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\\n\\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\\n\\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\\n\\n#### Contended resource\\n\\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\\n\\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\\n\\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\\n\\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\\n\\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\\n\\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\\n\\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\\n\\n#### Mode change\\n\\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\\n\\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\\n\\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\\n\\n#### Spatial transfer\\n\\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\\n\\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\\n\\n#### Policy under pressure\\n\\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\\n\\n#### Hidden waiting\\n\\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\\n\\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\\n\\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\\n\\n### Link the slice to the objective\\n\\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\\n\\n### Expose the process spine\\n\\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\\n\\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\\n\\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\\n\\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\\n\\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\\n\\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\\n\\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\\n\\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\\n\\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\\n\\n### Close a resource account\\n\\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\\n\\n### Close a mode change in both directions\\n\\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\\n\\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\\n\\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\\n\\n### Ask what is conserved\\n\\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\\n\\n### Establish retry scope\\n\\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\\n\\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\\n\\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\\n\\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\\n\\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\\n\\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\\n\\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\\n\\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\\n\\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\\n\\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\\n\\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\\n\\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\\n\\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\\n\\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\\n\\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\\n\\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\\n\\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\\n\\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\\n\\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\\n\\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\\n\\n### Purpose and process\\n\\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\\n\\n### Operational semantics\\n\\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\\n\\n### Quantities and context\\n\\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000024", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFGMEgzVjZWMUEzOFZFSzg1VEtLWDE5", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while checking a request. Recording approval releases that reviewer. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection also returns it immediately. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1F0H3W6Z20MRJ298XJNYZR4", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3W4VTHMYDVJ0K4J2PY1", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 5 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "During the five-business-day appeal window, is the original reviewer still assigned in a way that prevents taking a new review, or can they accept new reviews while answering appeal questions?", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1F0H3V7JNR4ZX98Y5RAMYEH" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.440Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.443Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.463Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.468Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3W4VTHMYDVJ0K4J2PY1", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.468Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3W4VTHMYDVJ0K4J2PY1", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284014274:oi83wwmv5u", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while checking a request. Recording approval releases that reviewer. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection also returns it immediately. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.469Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788284014274:oi83wwmv5u", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2046, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2046, + "totalTokens": 4103, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284014274 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3W4VTHMYDVJ0K4J2PY1", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.471Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\":\"sdc", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3W4VTHMYDVJ0K4J2PY1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.471Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "pn-modelling\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3W4VTHMYDVJ0K4J2PY1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.471Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3W4VTHMYDVJ0K4J2PY1", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 5, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284014274:oi83wwmv5u", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2046, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2046, + "totalTokens": 4103, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.473Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284014274:oi83wwmv5u", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2046, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2046, + "totalTokens": 4103, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284014274 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3W4VTHMYDVJ0K4J2PY1", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.473Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3W4VTHMYDVJ0K4J2PY1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.475Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284014479 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3W4VTHMYDVJ0K4J2PY1", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.479Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284014479 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3W4VTHMYDVJ0K4J2PY1", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.479Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 5, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3W4VTHMYDVJ0K4J2PY1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.480Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3W4VTHMYDVJ0K4J2PY1", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284014274:oi83wwmv5u", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2046, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2046, + "totalTokens": 4103, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284014274 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284014479 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.480Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3WHMD64BMQ9XPJWE3ER", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.481Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3WHMD64BMQ9XPJWE3ER", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284014274:oi83wwmv5u", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while checking a request. Recording approval releases that reviewer. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection also returns it immediately. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.481Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788284014274:oi83wwmv5u", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 1330, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 5375, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284014481 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3WHMD64BMQ9XPJWE3ER", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.482Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.flue/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3WHMD64BMQ9XPJWE3ER", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.483Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "packaged-skills/skil", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3WHMD64BMQ9XPJWE3ER", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.483Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "l%3Asdcpn-modelling%", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3WHMD64BMQ9XPJWE3ER", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.483Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "3A895714f96483ea", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3WHMD64BMQ9XPJWE3ER", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.483Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "31/universal-eli", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3WHMD64BMQ9XPJWE3ER", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.483Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "citation.md\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3WHMD64BMQ9XPJWE3ER", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.483Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3WHMD64BMQ9XPJWE3ER", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284014274:oi83wwmv5u", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 1330, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 5375, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.484Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284014274:oi83wwmv5u", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 1330, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 5375, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284014481 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3WHMD64BMQ9XPJWE3ER", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.484Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3WHMD64BMQ9XPJWE3ER", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.485Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284014486 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3WHMD64BMQ9XPJWE3ER", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.486Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284014486 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3WHMD64BMQ9XPJWE3ER", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.486Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + } + }, + "durationMs": 2, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3WHMD64BMQ9XPJWE3ER", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.487Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3WHMD64BMQ9XPJWE3ER", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284014274:oi83wwmv5u", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 1330, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 5375, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284014481 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284014486 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.488Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3WR4BYA3GEAPZ822YY4", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.488Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3WR4BYA3GEAPZ822YY4", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284014274:oi83wwmv5u", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while checking a request. Recording approval releases that reviewer. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection also returns it immediately. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.488Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788284014274:oi83wwmv5u", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4352, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 2621, + "cacheWrite": 4352, + "totalTokens": 11355, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284014489 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3WR4BYA3GEAPZ822YY4", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.490Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\":\"/.flue/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3WR4BYA3GEAPZ822YY4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.490Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "packaged-skills/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3WR4BYA3GEAPZ822YY4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.490Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "skill%3Asdcpn-modell", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3WR4BYA3GEAPZ822YY4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.490Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "ing%3A895714f964", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3WR4BYA3GEAPZ822YY4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.490Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "83ea31/sdcpn-eli", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3WR4BYA3GEAPZ822YY4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.490Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "citation.md\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3WR4BYA3GEAPZ822YY4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.490Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3WR4BYA3GEAPZ822YY4", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284014274:oi83wwmv5u", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 4352, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 2621, + "cacheWrite": 4352, + "totalTokens": 11355, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.491Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284014274:oi83wwmv5u", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4352, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 2621, + "cacheWrite": 4352, + "totalTokens": 11355, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284014489 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3WR4BYA3GEAPZ822YY4", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.491Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3WR4BYA3GEAPZ822YY4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.491Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284014493 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3WR4BYA3GEAPZ822YY4", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.493Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284014493 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3WR4BYA3GEAPZ822YY4", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.493Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + } + }, + "durationMs": 2, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3WR4BYA3GEAPZ822YY4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.494Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3WR4BYA3GEAPZ822YY4", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284014274:oi83wwmv5u", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4352, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 2621, + "cacheWrite": 4352, + "totalTokens": 11355, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284014489 + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284014493 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.495Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3X026QB4E0MHDA1RZZ7", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.496Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3X026QB4E0MHDA1RZZ7", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284014274:oi83wwmv5u", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while checking a request. Recording approval releases that reviewer. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection also returns it immediately. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.496Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "faux:1788284014274:oi83wwmv5u", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 48, + "cacheRead": 6257, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16095, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284014274 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3X026QB4E0MHDA1RZZ7", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.497Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "During the five-", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3X026QB4E0MHDA1RZZ7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.500Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "business-day", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3X026QB4E0MHDA1RZZ7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.500Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " appeal window, is t", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3X026QB4E0MHDA1RZZ7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.500Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "he original reviewer", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3X026QB4E0MHDA1RZZ7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.500Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " still assigned ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3X026QB4E0MHDA1RZZ7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.500Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "in a way tha", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3X026QB4E0MHDA1RZZ7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.500Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "t prevents takin", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3X026QB4E0MHDA1RZZ7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.500Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "g a new review, or c", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3X026QB4E0MHDA1RZZ7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 57, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.500Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "an they accept n", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3X026QB4E0MHDA1RZZ7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 58, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.500Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ew reviews while ans", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3X026QB4E0MHDA1RZZ7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 59, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.500Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "wering appeal questi", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3X026QB4E0MHDA1RZZ7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 60, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.500Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ons?", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3X026QB4E0MHDA1RZZ7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 61, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.500Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3X026QB4E0MHDA1RZZ7", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 5, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "faux:1788284014274:oi83wwmv5u", + "serverAddress": "localhost", + "serverPort": 0, + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "During the five-business-day appeal window, is the original reviewer still assigned in a way that prevents taking a new review, or can they accept new reviews while answering appeal questions?" + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 48, + "cacheRead": 6257, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16095, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 62, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.501Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "During the five-business-day appeal window, is the original reviewer still assigned in a way that prevents taking a new review, or can they accept new reviews while answering appeal questions?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284014274:oi83wwmv5u", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 48, + "cacheRead": 6257, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16095, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284014274 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3X026QB4E0MHDA1RZZ7", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 63, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.501Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0H3X026QB4E0MHDA1RZZ7", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "During the five-business-day appeal window, is the original reviewer still assigned in a way that prevents taking a new review, or can they accept new reviews while answering appeal questions?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284014274:oi83wwmv5u", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 48, + "cacheRead": 6257, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16095, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284014274 + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 64, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.502Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "activate-sdcpn", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284014274:oi83wwmv5u", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2046, + "output": 11, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 2046, + "totalTokens": 4103, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284014274 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "activate-sdcpn", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284014479 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284014274:oi83wwmv5u", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2007, + "output": 31, + "cacheRead": 1330, + "cacheWrite": 2007, + "totalTokens": 5375, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284014481 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-universal-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284014486 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284014274:oi83wwmv5u", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4352, + "output": 30, + "cacheRead": 2621, + "cacheWrite": 4352, + "totalTokens": 11355, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284014489 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "read-sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284014493 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "During the five-business-day appeal window, is the original reviewer still assigned in a way that prevents taking a new review, or can they accept new reviews while answering appeal questions?" + } + ], + "api": "faux:1788284014274:oi83wwmv5u", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 4895, + "output": 48, + "cacheRead": 6257, + "cacheWrite": 4895, + "totalTokens": 16095, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284014274 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 65, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.502Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 40, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 66, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.503Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while checking a request. Recording approval releases that reviewer. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection also returns it immediately. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0H3V8RPJHVX5FPF01481E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0H3VZBEG5R160VSZD376J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 67, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.503Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0H3V6V1A38VEK85TKKX19", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "5646f2d4f5f40769bb1ce96c0d93a29fe5b91a3dca3991fed8b8eac257670bb1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 68, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:33:34.503Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "d2d42344c40ddeb2471eeeba437032079bd2c7083afdbc2f9de5e823f841d5b8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "ebec2ac5faab6cbbbe26eeeebc2d7ac0ba7dc637fd43ea9b5917f8e0277f5515", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "c7cb5b2222b0d1b5aff861c4056f41ba8825aca284ec774d8e4f0fbf12807314", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "321f8405c12374315d61caf466001d6b4b5cf68b04325df77a7948daaa680de1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/scenarios.json": "1844df940b8de9d10d28e9537f966920aba581b36956a9ac26a3767824ca96cb", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/protocol.md": "ef1443bb02c6c26d4ded6edf9e023579bc32cdc394f90490edfb34eaf32b8ed2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md": "8cd2749c8292f01045ab4282fc7248c07046cecaf14a586a9ef286e2876cf8bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md": "82b035268c07cc8ee4736b5ffdd392c8f153793d2ca6b9ed57271c9b6146de10", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md": "8826b85d32d6c24fbc8f678ec394600676ec61c4a0b83d0a9cfa16be87fc5d76", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "1a2417cc5f9649d459c5efbc87cd3242db99a9717622a6d86073c72835818865" + }, + "promptSelection": { + "candidateCorePromptIncluded": true, + "v3SdcpnAppendIncluded": true, + "legacyCorePromptIncluded": false, + "legacyRoleMarkerIncluded": false, + "initialSystemPromptSha256": "ad472c3919f1857f1f5f02f83bf0adb83c4795808e44f2b58813b158585b61f7" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "candidateCorePrompt": "6a458c0bbbc9dee5b4454a54b032818227ab681ba9f7beaa60d4fe9628f6eb41", + "v3SdcpnAppend": "73cac46487d33051a90cc487ea7abfc11fec4b049af11a108396ec08d44569fb", + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S1-independent-r1.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S1-independent-r1.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2a2b5cb0148 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S1-independent-r1.json @@ -0,0 +1,1798 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v3-independent-s1-a7971c7f", + "phase": "paid", + "instrumentVersion": "v3", + "candidate": "independent", + "scenarioId": "S1", + "scenario": { + "title": "Underspecified interactive request", + "prompt": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "stopAfter": "The first consequential question.", + "expected": "Ask one high-yield question in operational vocabulary after loading universal and SDCPN elicitation judgment." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "I'll help you build a model of your approval process. Before we dive into the details, let me understand what you're trying to accomplish—that'll help us focus on what matters most.\n\n**A few orienting questions:**\n\n1. **What do you want this model to help you *do* or decide?** For instance:\n - Understand where bottlenecks happen?\n - Predict how long approvals typically take?\n - Identify where rejections or rework are most likely?\n - Compare performance under different staffing or rules?\n - Something else?\n\n2. **What is the main thing that moves through your approval process?** (e.g., a request, an application, a purchase order, a policy change)\n\n3. **Roughly how much time do you have?** Are you looking for a quick sketch or a detailed operational model?\n\nOnce I understand the goal and the basics, we can walk through a concrete example from your process and build out the model from there.", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling", "elicitation"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "toolu_01E5AzCEqpRRi1DNd4JoDZSK", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 2793, + "inputTokens": 2460, + "outputTokens": 204, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 2664, + "cost": 0.00348 + }, + { + "durationMs": 5247, + "inputTokens": 3805, + "outputTokens": 358, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 4163, + "cost": 0.005595 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 8040, + "inputTokens": 6265, + "outputTokens": 562, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 6827, + "cost": 0.009075 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nHelp me model our approval process as an SDCPN.\n\n## Assistant\nI'll help you build a model of your approval process. Before we dive into the details, let me understand what you're trying to accomplish—that'll help us focus on what matters most.\n\n**A few orienting questions:**\n\n1. **What do you want this model to help you *do* or decide?** For instance:\n - Understand where bottlenecks happen?\n - Predict how long approvals typically take?\n - Identify where rejections or rework are most likely?\n - Compare performance under different staffing or rules?\n - Something else?\n\n2. **What is the main thing that moves through your approval process?** (e.g., a request, an application, a purchase order, a policy change)\n\n3. **Roughly how much time do you have?** Are you looking for a quick sketch or a detailed operational model?\n\nOnce I understand the goal and the basics, we can walk through a concrete example from your process and build out the model from there.\n- tool activate_skill (toolu_01E5AzCEqpRRi1DNd4JoDZSK): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\\n\\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\\n\\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\\n\\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\\n\\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000024", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFGMEpHRktIWFQ2UTcySk4yN1pYRkZZ", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1F0JHDEMJTGK4RN7KN0TXN4", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JGGNG2JCBT1C8HTQG3A1", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The user wants to model their approval process as an SDCPN (stochastic dynamic coloured Petri net) in Petrinaut. According to my instructions, I should:\n\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation\n2. Help them develop an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece\n3. Speak about the operation in their vocabulary rather than Petri net jargon\n4. Ask purpose-relative questions following their concrete cases rather than opening with a battery of independent questions\n\nLet me start by activating the skill, then beginning the elicitation process.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01E5AzCEqpRRi1DNd4JoDZSK", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 3 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good, I've activated the skill. Now I need to orient before diving into detailed elicitation. The skill instructions tell me to:\n\n1. Establish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action\n2. Understand the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time\n\nI should start by asking about their purpose - what do they need this model to help them do with their approval process? This will help me understand what level of detail and what aspects are most important to model.\n\nLet me ask a few focused orientation questions rather than launching into a template-based interrogation.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'll help you build a model of your approval process. Before we dive into the details, let me understand what you're trying to accomplish—that'll help us focus on what matters most.\n\n**A few orienting questions:**\n\n1. **What do you want this model to help you *do* or decide?** For instance:\n - Understand where bottlenecks happen?\n - Predict how long approvals typically take?\n - Identify where rejections or rework are most likely?\n - Compare performance under different staffing or rules?\n - Something else?\n\n2. **What is the main thing that moves through your approval process?** (e.g., a request, an application, a purchase order, a policy change)\n\n3. **Roughly how much time do you have?** Are you looking for a quick sketch or a detailed operational model?\n\nOnce I understand the goal and the basics, we can walk through a concrete example from your process and build out the model from there.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1F0JGFM76V94JD78R5N12NP" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:20.149Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:20.152Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:20.175Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:20.181Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JGGNG2JCBT1C8HTQG3A1", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:20.181Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JGGNG2JCBT1C8HTQG3A1", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:20.181Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284060193 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JGGNG2JCBT1C8HTQG3A1", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:21.103Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JGGNG2JCBT1C8HTQG3A1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:21.104Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "The user wants to", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JGGNG2JCBT1C8HTQG3A1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:22.108Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " model their approval process as an SDCPN (stochastic dynamic coloured Petri net) in Petrinaut. According to my", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JGGNG2JCBT1C8HTQG3A1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:22.108Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " instructions, I should:\n\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation\n2. Help them develop an evidence", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JGGNG2JCBT1C8HTQG3A1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:22.108Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "-faithful process-model workpiece\n3. Speak about the operation in their vocabulary rather than Petri net j", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JGGNG2JCBT1C8HTQG3A1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:22.108Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "argon\n4. Ask purpose-relative questions following their concrete cases rather than opening with a battery", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JGGNG2JCBT1C8HTQG3A1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:22.959Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " of independent questions\n\nLet me start by activating the skill, then beginning the elicitation process.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JGGNG2JCBT1C8HTQG3A1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:22.959Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "The user wants to model their approval process as an SDCPN (stochastic dynamic coloured Petri net) in Petrinaut. According to my instructions, I should:\n\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation\n2. Help them develop an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece\n3. Speak about the operation in their vocabulary rather than Petri net jargon\n4. Ask purpose-relative questions following their concrete cases rather than opening with a battery of independent questions\n\nLet me start by activating the skill, then beginning the elicitation process.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JGGNG2JCBT1C8HTQG3A1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:22.959Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01E5AzCEqpRRi1DNd4JoDZSK", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JGGNG2JCBT1C8HTQG3A1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:22.961Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01E5AzCEqpRRi1DNd4JoDZSK", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\": \"sdcpn-modelling", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JGGNG2JCBT1C8HTQG3A1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:22.961Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01E5AzCEqpRRi1DNd4JoDZSK", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JGGNG2JCBT1C8HTQG3A1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:22.968Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JGGNG2JCBT1C8HTQG3A1", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 2793, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced81rwhXVWD6xMMHUb4S", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model their approval process as an SDCPN (stochastic dynamic coloured Petri net) in Petrinaut. According to my instructions, I should:\n\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation\n2. Help them develop an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece\n3. Speak about the operation in their vocabulary rather than Petri net jargon\n4. Ask purpose-relative questions following their concrete cases rather than opening with a battery of independent questions\n\nLet me start by activating the skill, then beginning the elicitation process.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01E5AzCEqpRRi1DNd4JoDZSK", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2460, + "output": 204, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 2664, + "cost": { + "input": 0.00246, + "output": 0.00102, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.00348 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:22.974Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model their approval process as an SDCPN (stochastic dynamic coloured Petri net) in Petrinaut. According to my instructions, I should:\n\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation\n2. Help them develop an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece\n3. Speak about the operation in their vocabulary rather than Petri net jargon\n4. Ask purpose-relative questions following their concrete cases rather than opening with a battery of independent questions\n\nLet me start by activating the skill, then beginning the elicitation process.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01E5AzCEqpRRi1DNd4JoDZSK", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2460, + "output": 204, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 2664, + "cost": { + "input": 0.00246, + "output": 0.00102, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.00348 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 142 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284060193, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced81rwhXVWD6xMMHUb4S", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JGGNG2JCBT1C8HTQG3A1", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:22.974Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01E5AzCEqpRRi1DNd4JoDZSK", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JGGNG2JCBT1C8HTQG3A1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:22.975Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01E5AzCEqpRRi1DNd4JoDZSK", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284062978 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JGGNG2JCBT1C8HTQG3A1", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:22.978Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01E5AzCEqpRRi1DNd4JoDZSK", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284062978 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JGGNG2JCBT1C8HTQG3A1", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:22.978Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01E5AzCEqpRRi1DNd4JoDZSK", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 3, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JGGNG2JCBT1C8HTQG3A1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:22.979Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JGGNG2JCBT1C8HTQG3A1", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model their approval process as an SDCPN (stochastic dynamic coloured Petri net) in Petrinaut. According to my instructions, I should:\n\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation\n2. Help them develop an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece\n3. Speak about the operation in their vocabulary rather than Petri net jargon\n4. Ask purpose-relative questions following their concrete cases rather than opening with a battery of independent questions\n\nLet me start by activating the skill, then beginning the elicitation process.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01E5AzCEqpRRi1DNd4JoDZSK", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2460, + "output": 204, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 2664, + "cost": { + "input": 0.00246, + "output": 0.00102, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.00348 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 142 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284060193, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced81rwhXVWD6xMMHUb4S", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01E5AzCEqpRRi1DNd4JoDZSK", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284062978 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:22.979Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JK84F30RYYSAACA82HB5", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:22.980Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JK84F30RYYSAACA82HB5", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model their approval process as an SDCPN (stochastic dynamic coloured Petri net) in Petrinaut. According to my instructions, I should:\n\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation\n2. Help them develop an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece\n3. Speak about the operation in their vocabulary rather than Petri net jargon\n4. Ask purpose-relative questions following their concrete cases rather than opening with a battery of independent questions\n\nLet me start by activating the skill, then beginning the elicitation process.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01E5AzCEqpRRi1DNd4JoDZSK", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01E5AzCEqpRRi1DNd4JoDZSK", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:22.980Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284062981 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JK84F30RYYSAACA82HB5", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:23.759Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JK84F30RYYSAACA82HB5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:23.760Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "Good", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JK84F30RYYSAACA82HB5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:24.762Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ", I've activated the skill. Now I need to orient before diving into detailed elicitation. The skill instructions", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JK84F30RYYSAACA82HB5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:24.762Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " tell me to:\n\n1. Establish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action\n2. Understand the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JK84F30RYYSAACA82HB5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:24.762Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ", and available time\n\nI should start by asking about their purpose - what do they need this model to help", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JK84F30RYYSAACA82HB5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:25.724Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " them do with their approval process? This will help me understand what level of detail and what aspects are", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JK84F30RYYSAACA82HB5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:25.725Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " most important to model.\n\nLet me ask a few focused orientation questions rather than launching into a template-based interrog", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JK84F30RYYSAACA82HB5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:25.725Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "ation.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JK84F30RYYSAACA82HB5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:25.725Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "Good, I've activated the skill. Now I need to orient before diving into detailed elicitation. The skill instructions tell me to:\n\n1. Establish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action\n2. Understand the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time\n\nI should start by asking about their purpose - what do they need this model to help them do with their approval process? This will help me understand what level of detail and what aspects are most important to model.\n\nLet me ask a few focused orientation questions rather than launching into a template-based interrogation.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JK84F30RYYSAACA82HB5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:25.725Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "I'll help you build a model of your approval process. Before we dive into the details, let me understand what", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JK84F30RYYSAACA82HB5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:26.728Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " you're trying to accomplish—that'll help us focus on what matters most.\n\n**A few orienting questions:**\n\n1. **What", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JK84F30RYYSAACA82HB5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:26.728Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " do you want this model to help you *do* or decide?** For instance:\n - Understand", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JK84F30RYYSAACA82HB5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:26.728Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " where bottlenecks happen?\n - Predict how long approvals typically take?\n - Identify where", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JK84F30RYYSAACA82HB5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:27.732Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " rejections or rework are most likely?\n - Compare performance under different staffing or rules?\n - Something", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JK84F30RYYSAACA82HB5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:27.732Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " else?\n\n2. **What is the main thing that moves through your approval process?** (e.g., a request, an application", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JK84F30RYYSAACA82HB5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:27.732Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": ", a purchase order, a policy change)\n\n3. **Roughly how much time do you have?** Are you looking for a", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JK84F30RYYSAACA82HB5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:27.732Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " quick sketch or a detailed operational model?\n\nOnce I understand the goal and the basics, we can walk through a", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JK84F30RYYSAACA82HB5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:28.214Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " concrete example from your process and build out the model from there.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JK84F30RYYSAACA82HB5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:28.214Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JK84F30RYYSAACA82HB5", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 5247, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced824NnEuRzGhPzH5sPm", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, I've activated the skill. Now I need to orient before diving into detailed elicitation. The skill instructions tell me to:\n\n1. Establish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action\n2. Understand the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time\n\nI should start by asking about their purpose - what do they need this model to help them do with their approval process? This will help me understand what level of detail and what aspects are most important to model.\n\nLet me ask a few focused orientation questions rather than launching into a template-based interrogation.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'll help you build a model of your approval process. Before we dive into the details, let me understand what you're trying to accomplish—that'll help us focus on what matters most.\n\n**A few orienting questions:**\n\n1. **What do you want this model to help you *do* or decide?** For instance:\n - Understand where bottlenecks happen?\n - Predict how long approvals typically take?\n - Identify where rejections or rework are most likely?\n - Compare performance under different staffing or rules?\n - Something else?\n\n2. **What is the main thing that moves through your approval process?** (e.g., a request, an application, a purchase order, a policy change)\n\n3. **Roughly how much time do you have?** Are you looking for a quick sketch or a detailed operational model?\n\nOnce I understand the goal and the basics, we can walk through a concrete example from your process and build out the model from there." + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3805, + "output": 358, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 4163, + "cost": { + "input": 0.003805, + "output": 0.0017900000000000001, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005595 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:28.228Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, I've activated the skill. Now I need to orient before diving into detailed elicitation. The skill instructions tell me to:\n\n1. Establish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action\n2. Understand the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time\n\nI should start by asking about their purpose - what do they need this model to help them do with their approval process? This will help me understand what level of detail and what aspects are most important to model.\n\nLet me ask a few focused orientation questions rather than launching into a template-based interrogation.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'll help you build a model of your approval process. Before we dive into the details, let me understand what you're trying to accomplish—that'll help us focus on what matters most.\n\n**A few orienting questions:**\n\n1. **What do you want this model to help you *do* or decide?** For instance:\n - Understand where bottlenecks happen?\n - Predict how long approvals typically take?\n - Identify where rejections or rework are most likely?\n - Compare performance under different staffing or rules?\n - Something else?\n\n2. **What is the main thing that moves through your approval process?** (e.g., a request, an application, a purchase order, a policy change)\n\n3. **Roughly how much time do you have?** Are you looking for a quick sketch or a detailed operational model?\n\nOnce I understand the goal and the basics, we can walk through a concrete example from your process and build out the model from there." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3805, + "output": 358, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 4163, + "cost": { + "input": 0.003805, + "output": 0.0017900000000000001, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005595 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 134 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284062981, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced824NnEuRzGhPzH5sPm", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JK84F30RYYSAACA82HB5", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:28.228Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JK84F30RYYSAACA82HB5", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, I've activated the skill. Now I need to orient before diving into detailed elicitation. The skill instructions tell me to:\n\n1. Establish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action\n2. Understand the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time\n\nI should start by asking about their purpose - what do they need this model to help them do with their approval process? This will help me understand what level of detail and what aspects are most important to model.\n\nLet me ask a few focused orientation questions rather than launching into a template-based interrogation.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'll help you build a model of your approval process. Before we dive into the details, let me understand what you're trying to accomplish—that'll help us focus on what matters most.\n\n**A few orienting questions:**\n\n1. **What do you want this model to help you *do* or decide?** For instance:\n - Understand where bottlenecks happen?\n - Predict how long approvals typically take?\n - Identify where rejections or rework are most likely?\n - Compare performance under different staffing or rules?\n - Something else?\n\n2. **What is the main thing that moves through your approval process?** (e.g., a request, an application, a purchase order, a policy change)\n\n3. **Roughly how much time do you have?** Are you looking for a quick sketch or a detailed operational model?\n\nOnce I understand the goal and the basics, we can walk through a concrete example from your process and build out the model from there." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3805, + "output": 358, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 4163, + "cost": { + "input": 0.003805, + "output": 0.0017900000000000001, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005595 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 134 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284062981, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced824NnEuRzGhPzH5sPm", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:28.228Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model their approval process as an SDCPN (stochastic dynamic coloured Petri net) in Petrinaut. According to my instructions, I should:\n\n1. Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation\n2. Help them develop an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece\n3. Speak about the operation in their vocabulary rather than Petri net jargon\n4. Ask purpose-relative questions following their concrete cases rather than opening with a battery of independent questions\n\nLet me start by activating the skill, then beginning the elicitation process.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01E5AzCEqpRRi1DNd4JoDZSK", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2460, + "output": 204, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 2664, + "cost": { + "input": 0.00246, + "output": 0.00102, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.00348 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 142 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284060193, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced81rwhXVWD6xMMHUb4S", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01E5AzCEqpRRi1DNd4JoDZSK", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284062978 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, I've activated the skill. Now I need to orient before diving into detailed elicitation. The skill instructions tell me to:\n\n1. Establish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action\n2. Understand the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time\n\nI should start by asking about their purpose - what do they need this model to help them do with their approval process? This will help me understand what level of detail and what aspects are most important to model.\n\nLet me ask a few focused orientation questions rather than launching into a template-based interrogation.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'll help you build a model of your approval process. Before we dive into the details, let me understand what you're trying to accomplish—that'll help us focus on what matters most.\n\n**A few orienting questions:**\n\n1. **What do you want this model to help you *do* or decide?** For instance:\n - Understand where bottlenecks happen?\n - Predict how long approvals typically take?\n - Identify where rejections or rework are most likely?\n - Compare performance under different staffing or rules?\n - Something else?\n\n2. **What is the main thing that moves through your approval process?** (e.g., a request, an application, a purchase order, a policy change)\n\n3. **Roughly how much time do you have?** Are you looking for a quick sketch or a detailed operational model?\n\nOnce I understand the goal and the basics, we can walk through a concrete example from your process and build out the model from there." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3805, + "output": 358, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 4163, + "cost": { + "input": 0.003805, + "output": 0.0017900000000000001, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005595 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 134 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284062981, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced824NnEuRzGhPzH5sPm", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:28.228Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 8054, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:28.229Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JGFP9MZWXFP9GJMHN4QY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JGGFCX1JTVVKJ62FV91X", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:28.229Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JGFKHXT6Q72JN27ZXFFY", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "10934ee197a3c98acca0e5c0c39988281ceb646ed4e7f90af6c389eef12b5b90", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:28.229Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "d2d42344c40ddeb2471eeeba437032079bd2c7083afdbc2f9de5e823f841d5b8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "ebec2ac5faab6cbbbe26eeeebc2d7ac0ba7dc637fd43ea9b5917f8e0277f5515", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "c7cb5b2222b0d1b5aff861c4056f41ba8825aca284ec774d8e4f0fbf12807314", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "321f8405c12374315d61caf466001d6b4b5cf68b04325df77a7948daaa680de1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/scenarios.json": "1844df940b8de9d10d28e9537f966920aba581b36956a9ac26a3767824ca96cb", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/protocol.md": "ef1443bb02c6c26d4ded6edf9e023579bc32cdc394f90490edfb34eaf32b8ed2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md": "8cd2749c8292f01045ab4282fc7248c07046cecaf14a586a9ef286e2876cf8bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md": "82b035268c07cc8ee4736b5ffdd392c8f153793d2ca6b9ed57271c9b6146de10", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md": "8826b85d32d6c24fbc8f678ec394600676ec61c4a0b83d0a9cfa16be87fc5d76", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "1a2417cc5f9649d459c5efbc87cd3242db99a9717622a6d86073c72835818865" + }, + "promptSelection": { + "candidateCorePromptIncluded": true, + "v3SdcpnAppendIncluded": true, + "legacyCorePromptIncluded": false, + "legacyRoleMarkerIncluded": false, + "initialSystemPromptSha256": "2156970b82b41d6893d08177fad8127a336be4afb5fd0bb184a52a7f63878fb8" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "candidateCorePrompt": "6a458c0bbbc9dee5b4454a54b032818227ab681ba9f7beaa60d4fe9628f6eb41", + "v3SdcpnAppend": "73cac46487d33051a90cc487ea7abfc11fec4b049af11a108396ec08d44569fb", + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S1-independent-r2.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S1-independent-r2.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6e0d87ca265 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S1-independent-r2.json @@ -0,0 +1,1770 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v3-independent-s1-1f4e594a", + "phase": "paid", + "instrumentVersion": "v3", + "candidate": "independent", + "scenarioId": "S1", + "scenario": { + "title": "Underspecified interactive request", + "prompt": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "stopAfter": "The first consequential question.", + "expected": "Ask one high-yield question in operational vocabulary after loading universal and SDCPN elicitation judgment." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "Good—I'm ready to help you develop your approval process as an SDCPN.\n\nLet me start by understanding what you need from this model. **What would you use this model to decide, explain, or investigate about your approval process?** For example, are you looking to find bottlenecks, check compliance, forecast cycle times, or something else?\n\nOnce I understand your purpose, I'll ask concrete questions about how your approval process actually works, following through a real example to capture what matters most.", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling", "elicitation"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "toolu_015swWmqiCAvFJ2xtc7AEVAi", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 2954, + "inputTokens": 2460, + "outputTokens": 243, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 2703, + "cost": 0.0036750000000000003 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3837, + "inputTokens": 3844, + "outputTokens": 242, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 4086, + "cost": 0.0050539999999999995 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 6791, + "inputTokens": 6304, + "outputTokens": 485, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 6789, + "cost": 0.008729 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nHelp me model our approval process as an SDCPN.\n\n## Assistant\nGood—I'm ready to help you develop your approval process as an SDCPN.\n\nLet me start by understanding what you need from this model. **What would you use this model to decide, explain, or investigate about your approval process?** For example, are you looking to find bottlenecks, check compliance, forecast cycle times, or something else?\n\nOnce I understand your purpose, I'll ask concrete questions about how your approval process actually works, following through a real example to capture what matters most.\n- tool activate_skill (toolu_015swWmqiCAvFJ2xtc7AEVAi): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\\n\\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\\n\\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\\n\\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\\n\\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000023", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFGMEtQU1g4VjBFQlA0MEFBUkI0MTQz", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1F0KQGS1YZPA01818GXQ6CJ", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KPTXAD3ESPN6C1P95SC5", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The user wants to model their approval process as a Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net (SDCPN) using Petrinaut. This is directly aligned with the \"sdcpn-modelling\" skill.\n\nAccording to my instructions:\n1. I should activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation\n2. I should help develop an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece\n3. I should speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than Petri net jargon\n4. I should use adaptive elicitation judgment - following concrete cases rather than a battery of independent questions\n5. I should deepen one answerable thread at a time\n\nLet me activate the skill first, then begin elicitation focused on understanding their approval process.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_015swWmqiCAvFJ2xtc7AEVAi", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 3 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I need to orient before starting elicitation. Let me establish:\n1. What is their purpose - what do they need to decide, answer, compare, explain, or change with this model?\n2. What is the boundary of the approval process?\n3. Who is the audience?\n4. What decisions or questions does this model need to support?\n\nI should start with an open, concrete question rather than a battery of independent questions. Let me start by understanding what approval process they're referring to and what they want to accomplish with the model.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good—I'm ready to help you develop your approval process as an SDCPN.\n\nLet me start by understanding what you need from this model. **What would you use this model to decide, explain, or investigate about your approval process?** For example, are you looking to find bottlenecks, check compliance, forecast cycle times, or something else?\n\nOnce I understand your purpose, I'll ask concrete questions about how your approval process actually works, following through a real example to capture what matters most.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1F0KPSX9PX0F2BZFM3RC0GP" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:59.390Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:59.393Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:59.416Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:59.421Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KPTXAD3ESPN6C1P95SC5", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:59.421Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KPTXAD3ESPN6C1P95SC5", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:59.421Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284099433 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KPTXAD3ESPN6C1P95SC5", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:00.123Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KPTXAD3ESPN6C1P95SC5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:00.125Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "The user wants to", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KPTXAD3ESPN6C1P95SC5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:01.128Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " model their approval process as a Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net (SDCPN) using Petrinaut. This is directly", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KPTXAD3ESPN6C1P95SC5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:01.128Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " aligned with the \"sdcpn-modelling\" skill.\n\nAccording to my instructions:\n1. I should activate the `sdcpn-modelling`", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KPTXAD3ESPN6C1P95SC5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:01.128Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " skill before substantive elicitation\n2. I should help develop an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece\n3.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KPTXAD3ESPN6C1P95SC5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:01.128Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " I should speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than Petri net jargon\n4. I should use adaptive elicitation judgment - following", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KPTXAD3ESPN6C1P95SC5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:02.302Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " concrete cases rather than a battery of independent questions\n5. I should deepen one answ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KPTXAD3ESPN6C1P95SC5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:02.302Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "erable thread at a time\n\nLet me activate the skill first, then begin elicitation focused on understanding their approval process.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KPTXAD3ESPN6C1P95SC5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:02.302Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "The user wants to model their approval process as a Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net (SDCPN) using Petrinaut. This is directly aligned with the \"sdcpn-modelling\" skill.\n\nAccording to my instructions:\n1. I should activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation\n2. I should help develop an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece\n3. I should speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than Petri net jargon\n4. I should use adaptive elicitation judgment - following concrete cases rather than a battery of independent questions\n5. I should deepen one answerable thread at a time\n\nLet me activate the skill first, then begin elicitation focused on understanding their approval process.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KPTXAD3ESPN6C1P95SC5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:02.366Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_015swWmqiCAvFJ2xtc7AEVAi", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KPTXAD3ESPN6C1P95SC5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:02.366Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_015swWmqiCAvFJ2xtc7AEVAi", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\": \"sdcpn-modelling", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KPTXAD3ESPN6C1P95SC5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:02.367Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_015swWmqiCAvFJ2xtc7AEVAi", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KPTXAD3ESPN6C1P95SC5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:02.368Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KPTXAD3ESPN6C1P95SC5", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 2954, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced84kDDTqMttKWAdiiCZ", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model their approval process as a Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net (SDCPN) using Petrinaut. This is directly aligned with the \"sdcpn-modelling\" skill.\n\nAccording to my instructions:\n1. I should activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation\n2. I should help develop an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece\n3. I should speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than Petri net jargon\n4. I should use adaptive elicitation judgment - following concrete cases rather than a battery of independent questions\n5. I should deepen one answerable thread at a time\n\nLet me activate the skill first, then begin elicitation focused on understanding their approval process.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_015swWmqiCAvFJ2xtc7AEVAi", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2460, + "output": 243, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 2703, + "cost": { + "input": 0.00246, + "output": 0.0012150000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.0036750000000000003 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:02.375Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model their approval process as a Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net (SDCPN) using Petrinaut. This is directly aligned with the \"sdcpn-modelling\" skill.\n\nAccording to my instructions:\n1. I should activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation\n2. I should help develop an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece\n3. I should speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than Petri net jargon\n4. I should use adaptive elicitation judgment - following concrete cases rather than a battery of independent questions\n5. I should deepen one answerable thread at a time\n\nLet me activate the skill first, then begin elicitation focused on understanding their approval process.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_015swWmqiCAvFJ2xtc7AEVAi", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2460, + "output": 243, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 2703, + "cost": { + "input": 0.00246, + "output": 0.0012150000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.0036750000000000003 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 181 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284099433, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced84kDDTqMttKWAdiiCZ", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KPTXAD3ESPN6C1P95SC5", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:02.376Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_015swWmqiCAvFJ2xtc7AEVAi", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KPTXAD3ESPN6C1P95SC5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:02.377Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_015swWmqiCAvFJ2xtc7AEVAi", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284102380 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KPTXAD3ESPN6C1P95SC5", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:02.380Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_015swWmqiCAvFJ2xtc7AEVAi", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284102380 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KPTXAD3ESPN6C1P95SC5", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:02.380Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_015swWmqiCAvFJ2xtc7AEVAi", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 3, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KPTXAD3ESPN6C1P95SC5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:02.381Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KPTXAD3ESPN6C1P95SC5", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model their approval process as a Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net (SDCPN) using Petrinaut. This is directly aligned with the \"sdcpn-modelling\" skill.\n\nAccording to my instructions:\n1. I should activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation\n2. I should help develop an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece\n3. I should speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than Petri net jargon\n4. I should use adaptive elicitation judgment - following concrete cases rather than a battery of independent questions\n5. I should deepen one answerable thread at a time\n\nLet me activate the skill first, then begin elicitation focused on understanding their approval process.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_015swWmqiCAvFJ2xtc7AEVAi", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2460, + "output": 243, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 2703, + "cost": { + "input": 0.00246, + "output": 0.0012150000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.0036750000000000003 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 181 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284099433, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced84kDDTqMttKWAdiiCZ", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_015swWmqiCAvFJ2xtc7AEVAi", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284102380 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:02.381Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KSQE77XTTRT6XXX2KRBN", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:02.382Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KSQE77XTTRT6XXX2KRBN", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model their approval process as a Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net (SDCPN) using Petrinaut. This is directly aligned with the \"sdcpn-modelling\" skill.\n\nAccording to my instructions:\n1. I should activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation\n2. I should help develop an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece\n3. I should speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than Petri net jargon\n4. I should use adaptive elicitation judgment - following concrete cases rather than a battery of independent questions\n5. I should deepen one answerable thread at a time\n\nLet me activate the skill first, then begin elicitation focused on understanding their approval process.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_015swWmqiCAvFJ2xtc7AEVAi", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_015swWmqiCAvFJ2xtc7AEVAi", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:02.382Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284102383 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KSQE77XTTRT6XXX2KRBN", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:03.131Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KSQE77XTTRT6XXX2KRBN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:03.132Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "Good", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KSQE77XTTRT6XXX2KRBN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:04.136Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ", the skill", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KSQE77XTTRT6XXX2KRBN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:04.136Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " is activated. Now I need to orient before starting elicitation. Let me establish:\n1. What is", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KSQE77XTTRT6XXX2KRBN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:04.136Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " their purpose - what do they need to decide, answer, compare, explain, or change with", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KSQE77XTTRT6XXX2KRBN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:04.136Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " this model?\n2. What is the boundary of the approval process?\n3. Who is the audience?\n4. What decisions", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KSQE77XTTRT6XXX2KRBN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:05.119Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " or questions does this model need to support?\n\nI should start with an open, concrete question rather", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KSQE77XTTRT6XXX2KRBN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:05.119Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " than a battery of independent questions. Let me start by understanding what approval process they're referring to and what they want", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KSQE77XTTRT6XXX2KRBN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:05.119Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " to accomplish with the model.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KSQE77XTTRT6XXX2KRBN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:05.119Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I need to orient before starting elicitation. Let me establish:\n1. What is their purpose - what do they need to decide, answer, compare, explain, or change with this model?\n2. What is the boundary of the approval process?\n3. Who is the audience?\n4. What decisions or questions does this model need to support?\n\nI should start with an open, concrete question rather than a battery of independent questions. Let me start by understanding what approval process they're referring to and what they want to accomplish with the model.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KSQE77XTTRT6XXX2KRBN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:05.119Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "Good—I'm ready to help you develop your approval process as an SDCPN.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KSQE77XTTRT6XXX2KRBN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:06.121Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "\n\nLet me start by understanding what you need from this model. **What would you use this model to decide, explain, or investigate", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KSQE77XTTRT6XXX2KRBN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:06.121Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " about your approval process?** For example, are you looking to find bottlenecks, check compliance, forecast", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KSQE77XTTRT6XXX2KRBN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:06.121Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " cycle times, or something else?\n\nOnce I understand your purpose, I'll ask concrete questions about how your approval process actually works, following through a", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KSQE77XTTRT6XXX2KRBN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:06.121Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " real example to capture what matters most.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KSQE77XTTRT6XXX2KRBN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:06.210Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KSQE77XTTRT6XXX2KRBN", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3837, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced84xyvTXtEVLVZ2KZ6F", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I need to orient before starting elicitation. Let me establish:\n1. What is their purpose - what do they need to decide, answer, compare, explain, or change with this model?\n2. What is the boundary of the approval process?\n3. Who is the audience?\n4. What decisions or questions does this model need to support?\n\nI should start with an open, concrete question rather than a battery of independent questions. Let me start by understanding what approval process they're referring to and what they want to accomplish with the model.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good—I'm ready to help you develop your approval process as an SDCPN.\n\nLet me start by understanding what you need from this model. **What would you use this model to decide, explain, or investigate about your approval process?** For example, are you looking to find bottlenecks, check compliance, forecast cycle times, or something else?\n\nOnce I understand your purpose, I'll ask concrete questions about how your approval process actually works, following through a real example to capture what matters most." + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3844, + "output": 242, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 4086, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0038439999999999998, + "output": 0.0012100000000000001, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.0050539999999999995 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:06.219Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I need to orient before starting elicitation. Let me establish:\n1. What is their purpose - what do they need to decide, answer, compare, explain, or change with this model?\n2. What is the boundary of the approval process?\n3. Who is the audience?\n4. What decisions or questions does this model need to support?\n\nI should start with an open, concrete question rather than a battery of independent questions. Let me start by understanding what approval process they're referring to and what they want to accomplish with the model.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good—I'm ready to help you develop your approval process as an SDCPN.\n\nLet me start by understanding what you need from this model. **What would you use this model to decide, explain, or investigate about your approval process?** For example, are you looking to find bottlenecks, check compliance, forecast cycle times, or something else?\n\nOnce I understand your purpose, I'll ask concrete questions about how your approval process actually works, following through a real example to capture what matters most." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3844, + "output": 242, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 4086, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0038439999999999998, + "output": 0.0012100000000000001, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.0050539999999999995 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 128 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284102383, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced84xyvTXtEVLVZ2KZ6F", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KSQE77XTTRT6XXX2KRBN", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:06.219Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KSQE77XTTRT6XXX2KRBN", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I need to orient before starting elicitation. Let me establish:\n1. What is their purpose - what do they need to decide, answer, compare, explain, or change with this model?\n2. What is the boundary of the approval process?\n3. Who is the audience?\n4. What decisions or questions does this model need to support?\n\nI should start with an open, concrete question rather than a battery of independent questions. Let me start by understanding what approval process they're referring to and what they want to accomplish with the model.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good—I'm ready to help you develop your approval process as an SDCPN.\n\nLet me start by understanding what you need from this model. **What would you use this model to decide, explain, or investigate about your approval process?** For example, are you looking to find bottlenecks, check compliance, forecast cycle times, or something else?\n\nOnce I understand your purpose, I'll ask concrete questions about how your approval process actually works, following through a real example to capture what matters most." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3844, + "output": 242, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 4086, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0038439999999999998, + "output": 0.0012100000000000001, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.0050539999999999995 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 128 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284102383, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced84xyvTXtEVLVZ2KZ6F", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:06.219Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model their approval process as a Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net (SDCPN) using Petrinaut. This is directly aligned with the \"sdcpn-modelling\" skill.\n\nAccording to my instructions:\n1. I should activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation\n2. I should help develop an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece\n3. I should speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than Petri net jargon\n4. I should use adaptive elicitation judgment - following concrete cases rather than a battery of independent questions\n5. I should deepen one answerable thread at a time\n\nLet me activate the skill first, then begin elicitation focused on understanding their approval process.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_015swWmqiCAvFJ2xtc7AEVAi", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2460, + "output": 243, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 2703, + "cost": { + "input": 0.00246, + "output": 0.0012150000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.0036750000000000003 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 181 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284099433, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced84kDDTqMttKWAdiiCZ", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_015swWmqiCAvFJ2xtc7AEVAi", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284102380 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I need to orient before starting elicitation. Let me establish:\n1. What is their purpose - what do they need to decide, answer, compare, explain, or change with this model?\n2. What is the boundary of the approval process?\n3. Who is the audience?\n4. What decisions or questions does this model need to support?\n\nI should start with an open, concrete question rather than a battery of independent questions. Let me start by understanding what approval process they're referring to and what they want to accomplish with the model.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good—I'm ready to help you develop your approval process as an SDCPN.\n\nLet me start by understanding what you need from this model. **What would you use this model to decide, explain, or investigate about your approval process?** For example, are you looking to find bottlenecks, check compliance, forecast cycle times, or something else?\n\nOnce I understand your purpose, I'll ask concrete questions about how your approval process actually works, following through a real example to capture what matters most." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3844, + "output": 242, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 4086, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0038439999999999998, + "output": 0.0012100000000000001, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.0050539999999999995 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 128 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284102383, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced84xyvTXtEVLVZ2KZ6F", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:06.220Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 6805, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:06.221Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KPSZ9R0EJQRS2TZ61K8Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KPTQ10HPA1ZK6DH3KZBY", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:06.221Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KPSX8V0EBP40AARB4143", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "46fef60e5c6d6ffe905631904e6fb8b90c553a4247c2b2b6e22d2af2fa114c1f", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:06.221Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "d2d42344c40ddeb2471eeeba437032079bd2c7083afdbc2f9de5e823f841d5b8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "ebec2ac5faab6cbbbe26eeeebc2d7ac0ba7dc637fd43ea9b5917f8e0277f5515", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "c7cb5b2222b0d1b5aff861c4056f41ba8825aca284ec774d8e4f0fbf12807314", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "321f8405c12374315d61caf466001d6b4b5cf68b04325df77a7948daaa680de1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/scenarios.json": "1844df940b8de9d10d28e9537f966920aba581b36956a9ac26a3767824ca96cb", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/protocol.md": "ef1443bb02c6c26d4ded6edf9e023579bc32cdc394f90490edfb34eaf32b8ed2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md": "8cd2749c8292f01045ab4282fc7248c07046cecaf14a586a9ef286e2876cf8bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md": "82b035268c07cc8ee4736b5ffdd392c8f153793d2ca6b9ed57271c9b6146de10", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md": "8826b85d32d6c24fbc8f678ec394600676ec61c4a0b83d0a9cfa16be87fc5d76", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "1a2417cc5f9649d459c5efbc87cd3242db99a9717622a6d86073c72835818865" + }, + "promptSelection": { + "candidateCorePromptIncluded": true, + "v3SdcpnAppendIncluded": true, + "legacyCorePromptIncluded": false, + "legacyRoleMarkerIncluded": false, + "initialSystemPromptSha256": "2156970b82b41d6893d08177fad8127a336be4afb5fd0bb184a52a7f63878fb8" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "candidateCorePrompt": "6a458c0bbbc9dee5b4454a54b032818227ab681ba9f7beaa60d4fe9628f6eb41", + "v3SdcpnAppend": "73cac46487d33051a90cc487ea7abfc11fec4b049af11a108396ec08d44569fb", + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S1-independent-r3.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S1-independent-r3.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0c784546e8c --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S1-independent-r3.json @@ -0,0 +1,1737 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v3-independent-s1-f7223a2e", + "phase": "paid", + "instrumentVersion": "v3", + "candidate": "independent", + "scenarioId": "S1", + "scenario": { + "title": "Underspecified interactive request", + "prompt": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "stopAfter": "The first consequential question.", + "expected": "Ask one high-yield question in operational vocabulary after loading universal and SDCPN elicitation judgment." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "I'll help you develop a model of your approval process. Let me start with some orientation so we build something that serves your actual purpose.\n\n**What do you need this model to help you decide or understand?** For example, are you:\n- Analyzing how long approvals typically take?\n- Finding bottlenecks or failure points?\n- Redesigning the process to be faster or more reliable?\n- Training people or documenting how it works?\n- Something else?\n\nUnderstanding your goal will help us focus on the right details and level of precision.", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling", "elicitation"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "toolu_012zryWJriwdVBnbnavuB7ag", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 1896, + "inputTokens": 2460, + "outputTokens": 157, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 2617, + "cost": 0.003245 + }, + { + "durationMs": 4497, + "inputTokens": 3758, + "outputTokens": 294, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 4052, + "cost": 0.005228 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 6393, + "inputTokens": 6218, + "outputTokens": 451, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 6669, + "cost": 0.008473 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nHelp me model our approval process as an SDCPN.\n\n## Assistant\nI'll help you develop a model of your approval process. Let me start with some orientation so we build something that serves your actual purpose.\n\n**What do you need this model to help you decide or understand?** For example, are you:\n- Analyzing how long approvals typically take?\n- Finding bottlenecks or failure points?\n- Redesigning the process to be faster or more reliable?\n- Training people or documenting how it works?\n- Something else?\n\nUnderstanding your goal will help us focus on the right details and level of precision.\n- tool activate_skill (toolu_012zryWJriwdVBnbnavuB7ag): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\\n\\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\\n\\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\\n\\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\\n\\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000022", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFGME00N1RaOUtER0szU0FBOVNSNTUw", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1F0M50Y7MPWPTHWTV747FM8", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M48WNXP22AWBSVKG9YM0", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net) in Petrinaut. According to my instructions, I should activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nLet me activate that skill first.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_012zryWJriwdVBnbnavuB7ag", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 4 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I need to orient the conversation. According to the skill instructions, I should establish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time.\n\nThe user has stated they want to model an approval process as an SDCPN. I should start by understanding:\n- What decision or purpose this model needs to support?\n- What is the scope and boundary of the approval process?\n- What are the key steps or actors involved?\n- What are the performance or other concerns?\n\nI'll ask focused questions to establish the orientation, not a battery of independent questions. I should follow the universal elicitation principle of deepening one answerable thread at a time.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'll help you develop a model of your approval process. Let me start with some orientation so we build something that serves your actual purpose.\n\n**What do you need this model to help you decide or understand?** For example, are you:\n- Analyzing how long approvals typically take?\n- Finding bottlenecks or failure points?\n- Redesigning the process to be faster or more reliable?\n- Training people or documenting how it works?\n- Something else?\n\nUnderstanding your goal will help us focus on the right details and level of precision.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1F0M47V9T1BAWSX2TH8AZJN" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:13.148Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:13.151Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:13.174Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:13.180Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M48WNXP22AWBSVKG9YM0", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:13.180Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M48WNXP22AWBSVKG9YM0", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:13.181Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284113192 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M48WNXP22AWBSVKG9YM0", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:13.951Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M48WNXP22AWBSVKG9YM0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:13.953Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "The user wants to", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M48WNXP22AWBSVKG9YM0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:14.889Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net) in Petrinaut. According to my", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M48WNXP22AWBSVKG9YM0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:14.889Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " instructions, I should activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M48WNXP22AWBSVKG9YM0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:14.890Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "\n\nLet me activate that skill first.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M48WNXP22AWBSVKG9YM0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:14.890Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net) in Petrinaut. According to my instructions, I should activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nLet me activate that skill first.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M48WNXP22AWBSVKG9YM0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:14.890Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_012zryWJriwdVBnbnavuB7ag", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M48WNXP22AWBSVKG9YM0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:14.891Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_012zryWJriwdVBnbnavuB7ag", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\": \"sdcpn-modelling", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M48WNXP22AWBSVKG9YM0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:15.067Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_012zryWJriwdVBnbnavuB7ag", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M48WNXP22AWBSVKG9YM0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:15.067Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M48WNXP22AWBSVKG9YM0", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 1896, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced85mA3kJnz5sAdeLP13", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net) in Petrinaut. According to my instructions, I should activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nLet me activate that skill first.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_012zryWJriwdVBnbnavuB7ag", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2460, + "output": 157, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 2617, + "cost": { + "input": 0.00246, + "output": 0.0007850000000000001, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.003245 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:15.077Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net) in Petrinaut. According to my instructions, I should activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nLet me activate that skill first.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_012zryWJriwdVBnbnavuB7ag", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2460, + "output": 157, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 2617, + "cost": { + "input": 0.00246, + "output": 0.0007850000000000001, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.003245 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 95 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284113192, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced85mA3kJnz5sAdeLP13", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M48WNXP22AWBSVKG9YM0", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:15.077Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_012zryWJriwdVBnbnavuB7ag", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M48WNXP22AWBSVKG9YM0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:15.079Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_012zryWJriwdVBnbnavuB7ag", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284115082 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M48WNXP22AWBSVKG9YM0", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:15.082Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_012zryWJriwdVBnbnavuB7ag", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284115082 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M48WNXP22AWBSVKG9YM0", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:15.082Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_012zryWJriwdVBnbnavuB7ag", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 4, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M48WNXP22AWBSVKG9YM0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:15.082Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M48WNXP22AWBSVKG9YM0", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net) in Petrinaut. According to my instructions, I should activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nLet me activate that skill first.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_012zryWJriwdVBnbnavuB7ag", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2460, + "output": 157, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 2617, + "cost": { + "input": 0.00246, + "output": 0.0007850000000000001, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.003245 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 95 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284113192, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced85mA3kJnz5sAdeLP13", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_012zryWJriwdVBnbnavuB7ag", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284115082 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:15.083Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M64BWWK7YAY0NYFA54ES", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:15.083Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M64BWWK7YAY0NYFA54ES", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net) in Petrinaut. According to my instructions, I should activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nLet me activate that skill first.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_012zryWJriwdVBnbnavuB7ag", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_012zryWJriwdVBnbnavuB7ag", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:15.083Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284115084 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M64BWWK7YAY0NYFA54ES", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:15.755Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M64BWWK7YAY0NYFA54ES", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:15.757Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "Good", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M64BWWK7YAY0NYFA54ES", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:16.759Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ", the skill is activated. Now I need to orient the conversation. According to the skill", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M64BWWK7YAY0NYFA54ES", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:16.759Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " instructions, I should establish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time.\n\nThe user has stated", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M64BWWK7YAY0NYFA54ES", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:16.759Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " they want to model an approval process as an SDCPN. I should start by understanding:\n- What decision", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M64BWWK7YAY0NYFA54ES", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:16.759Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " or purpose this model needs to support?\n- What is the scope and boundary of the approval process?\n- What are the key", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M64BWWK7YAY0NYFA54ES", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:17.997Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " steps or actors involved?\n- What are the performance or other concerns?\n\nI'll ask focused questions to establish the orientation,", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M64BWWK7YAY0NYFA54ES", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:17.997Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " not a battery of independent questions. I should follow the universal elicitation principle of deepening one", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M64BWWK7YAY0NYFA54ES", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:17.997Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " answerable thread at a time.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M64BWWK7YAY0NYFA54ES", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:17.997Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I need to orient the conversation. According to the skill instructions, I should establish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time.\n\nThe user has stated they want to model an approval process as an SDCPN. I should start by understanding:\n- What decision or purpose this model needs to support?\n- What is the scope and boundary of the approval process?\n- What are the key steps or actors involved?\n- What are the performance or other concerns?\n\nI'll ask focused questions to establish the orientation, not a battery of independent questions. I should follow the universal elicitation principle of deepening one answerable thread at a time.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M64BWWK7YAY0NYFA54ES", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:17.998Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "I'll help you develop a model of", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M64BWWK7YAY0NYFA54ES", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:19.001Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " your approval process. Let me start with some orientation so we build something that serves your actual purpose.\n\n**What", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M64BWWK7YAY0NYFA54ES", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:19.001Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " do you need this model to help you decide or understand?** For example, are you:\n- Analyzing how", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M64BWWK7YAY0NYFA54ES", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:19.001Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " long approvals typically take?\n- Finding bottlenecks or failure points?\n- Redesigning the process", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M64BWWK7YAY0NYFA54ES", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:19.578Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " to be faster or more reliable?\n- Training people or documenting how it works?\n- Something else?\n\nUnderstanding your goal will help us", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M64BWWK7YAY0NYFA54ES", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:19.578Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " focus on the right details and level of precision.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M64BWWK7YAY0NYFA54ES", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:19.578Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M64BWWK7YAY0NYFA54ES", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4497, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced85ty6X5KWRYwSSj2CX", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I need to orient the conversation. According to the skill instructions, I should establish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time.\n\nThe user has stated they want to model an approval process as an SDCPN. I should start by understanding:\n- What decision or purpose this model needs to support?\n- What is the scope and boundary of the approval process?\n- What are the key steps or actors involved?\n- What are the performance or other concerns?\n\nI'll ask focused questions to establish the orientation, not a battery of independent questions. I should follow the universal elicitation principle of deepening one answerable thread at a time.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'll help you develop a model of your approval process. Let me start with some orientation so we build something that serves your actual purpose.\n\n**What do you need this model to help you decide or understand?** For example, are you:\n- Analyzing how long approvals typically take?\n- Finding bottlenecks or failure points?\n- Redesigning the process to be faster or more reliable?\n- Training people or documenting how it works?\n- Something else?\n\nUnderstanding your goal will help us focus on the right details and level of precision." + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3758, + "output": 294, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 4052, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0037579999999999996, + "output": 0.0014700000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005228 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:19.580Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I need to orient the conversation. According to the skill instructions, I should establish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time.\n\nThe user has stated they want to model an approval process as an SDCPN. I should start by understanding:\n- What decision or purpose this model needs to support?\n- What is the scope and boundary of the approval process?\n- What are the key steps or actors involved?\n- What are the performance or other concerns?\n\nI'll ask focused questions to establish the orientation, not a battery of independent questions. I should follow the universal elicitation principle of deepening one answerable thread at a time.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'll help you develop a model of your approval process. Let me start with some orientation so we build something that serves your actual purpose.\n\n**What do you need this model to help you decide or understand?** For example, are you:\n- Analyzing how long approvals typically take?\n- Finding bottlenecks or failure points?\n- Redesigning the process to be faster or more reliable?\n- Training people or documenting how it works?\n- Something else?\n\nUnderstanding your goal will help us focus on the right details and level of precision." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3758, + "output": 294, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 4052, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0037579999999999996, + "output": 0.0014700000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005228 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 169 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284115084, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced85ty6X5KWRYwSSj2CX", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M64BWWK7YAY0NYFA54ES", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:19.580Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0M64BWWK7YAY0NYFA54ES", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I need to orient the conversation. According to the skill instructions, I should establish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time.\n\nThe user has stated they want to model an approval process as an SDCPN. I should start by understanding:\n- What decision or purpose this model needs to support?\n- What is the scope and boundary of the approval process?\n- What are the key steps or actors involved?\n- What are the performance or other concerns?\n\nI'll ask focused questions to establish the orientation, not a battery of independent questions. I should follow the universal elicitation principle of deepening one answerable thread at a time.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'll help you develop a model of your approval process. Let me start with some orientation so we build something that serves your actual purpose.\n\n**What do you need this model to help you decide or understand?** For example, are you:\n- Analyzing how long approvals typically take?\n- Finding bottlenecks or failure points?\n- Redesigning the process to be faster or more reliable?\n- Training people or documenting how it works?\n- Something else?\n\nUnderstanding your goal will help us focus on the right details and level of precision." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3758, + "output": 294, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 4052, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0037579999999999996, + "output": 0.0014700000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005228 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 169 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284115084, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced85ty6X5KWRYwSSj2CX", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:19.580Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net) in Petrinaut. According to my instructions, I should activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nLet me activate that skill first.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_012zryWJriwdVBnbnavuB7ag", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2460, + "output": 157, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 2617, + "cost": { + "input": 0.00246, + "output": 0.0007850000000000001, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.003245 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 95 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284113192, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced85mA3kJnz5sAdeLP13", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_012zryWJriwdVBnbnavuB7ag", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284115082 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I need to orient the conversation. According to the skill instructions, I should establish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time.\n\nThe user has stated they want to model an approval process as an SDCPN. I should start by understanding:\n- What decision or purpose this model needs to support?\n- What is the scope and boundary of the approval process?\n- What are the key steps or actors involved?\n- What are the performance or other concerns?\n\nI'll ask focused questions to establish the orientation, not a battery of independent questions. I should follow the universal elicitation principle of deepening one answerable thread at a time.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'll help you develop a model of your approval process. Let me start with some orientation so we build something that serves your actual purpose.\n\n**What do you need this model to help you decide or understand?** For example, are you:\n- Analyzing how long approvals typically take?\n- Finding bottlenecks or failure points?\n- Redesigning the process to be faster or more reliable?\n- Training people or documenting how it works?\n- Something else?\n\nUnderstanding your goal will help us focus on the right details and level of precision." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3758, + "output": 294, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 4052, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0037579999999999996, + "output": 0.0014700000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005228 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 169 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284115084, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced85ty6X5KWRYwSSj2CX", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:19.580Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 6407, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:19.581Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0M47WZ9544KNSXQKD6NMS", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0M48PSQCERYRJSMV28R8Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:19.581Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0M47TZ9KDGK3SAA9SR550", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "ade213abe48db68eb22c5623ddae1b780f3fa71f3a1e23d404b30ff352bf6549", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:19.581Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "d2d42344c40ddeb2471eeeba437032079bd2c7083afdbc2f9de5e823f841d5b8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "ebec2ac5faab6cbbbe26eeeebc2d7ac0ba7dc637fd43ea9b5917f8e0277f5515", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "c7cb5b2222b0d1b5aff861c4056f41ba8825aca284ec774d8e4f0fbf12807314", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "321f8405c12374315d61caf466001d6b4b5cf68b04325df77a7948daaa680de1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/scenarios.json": "1844df940b8de9d10d28e9537f966920aba581b36956a9ac26a3767824ca96cb", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/protocol.md": "ef1443bb02c6c26d4ded6edf9e023579bc32cdc394f90490edfb34eaf32b8ed2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md": "8cd2749c8292f01045ab4282fc7248c07046cecaf14a586a9ef286e2876cf8bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md": "82b035268c07cc8ee4736b5ffdd392c8f153793d2ca6b9ed57271c9b6146de10", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md": "8826b85d32d6c24fbc8f678ec394600676ec61c4a0b83d0a9cfa16be87fc5d76", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "1a2417cc5f9649d459c5efbc87cd3242db99a9717622a6d86073c72835818865" + }, + "promptSelection": { + "candidateCorePromptIncluded": true, + "v3SdcpnAppendIncluded": true, + "legacyCorePromptIncluded": false, + "legacyRoleMarkerIncluded": false, + "initialSystemPromptSha256": "2156970b82b41d6893d08177fad8127a336be4afb5fd0bb184a52a7f63878fb8" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "candidateCorePrompt": "6a458c0bbbc9dee5b4454a54b032818227ab681ba9f7beaa60d4fe9628f6eb41", + "v3SdcpnAppend": "73cac46487d33051a90cc487ea7abfc11fec4b049af11a108396ec08d44569fb", + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S1-packaged-r1.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S1-packaged-r1.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ebc38125872 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S1-packaged-r1.json @@ -0,0 +1,3343 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v3-packaged-s1-784b58c8", + "phase": "paid", + "instrumentVersion": "v3", + "candidate": "packaged", + "scenarioId": "S1", + "scenario": { + "title": "Underspecified interactive request", + "prompt": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "stopAfter": "The first consequential question.", + "expected": "Ask one high-yield question in operational vocabulary after loading universal and SDCPN elicitation judgment." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "I'll help you develop a process model for your approval workflow. Let me first activate the specialized modelling guidance.\n\nI need to read the modelling guidance before we start eliciting your approval process details.\n\nGood. Now I can help you model your approval process. Let me start by understanding what you need this model to help you decide or answer.\n\n**What question or decision would this model help you address?** For example, are you looking to understand bottlenecks, estimate how long approvals take, compare different approval strategies, check whether a policy is being followed, estimate resource needs, or something else?", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "toolu_01GQRK3SU3Kkm5wFpezLtStr", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "toolu_018uH9UBJotzLEtWRVykDvMx", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "toolu_019NQptTaRGzah17REYVzjMp", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "toolu_019hsn6RYAPQyKdWPJopLaej", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md" + }, + "output": "# Process-Model Workpiece and Recording Contract\n\nThe workpiece is the shared, recoverable operational account. Elicitation and revision maintain it; construction consumes it. The transcript remains evidence, not the primary model.\n\nFollow the person's thread during conversation and file material into the workpiece afterward. Its headings are recording homes, not question order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose, while keeping consequential omissions visible.\n\n## Recording distinctions\n\nUse these distinctions wherever they carry information; they are not mandatory labels on every sentence:\n\n- **Expert evidence** — What the person said, preserving consequential vocabulary, hedges, context, and source regime.\n- **Working account** — The current normalized operational description accepted for use.\n- **Agent inference** — An interpretation of evidence, visibly attributed to the agent.\n- **Assumed** — A value or structure proposed by the agent, with its reason, consequence, and route to checking.\n- **Unknown** — Asked, but the person does not know.\n- **Not yet asked** — Relevant and identified, but not yet addressed.\n- **Deferred** — Left for later, with why it matters and a named source or route to an answer.\n- **Declined** — The person chose not to answer or include it.\n- **Conflict** — Accounts cannot yet be used together; preserve both and what could distinguish them.\n- **Correction** — A current account that replaces an earlier one, retaining enough history to explain the change without leaving both active.\n- **Contextual coexistence** — Different accounts apply under different people, times, modes, directions, policies, or operating conditions.\n- **Omitted** — Deliberately outside the model, with why the purpose permits the omission.\n- **Target loss** — Supported operational meaning the SDCPN or current tools cannot faithfully carry.\n\nEvidence and precision are independent. “About three hours” may be supported but coarse; an exact agent-supplied value may be precise-looking but unsupported.\n\nKeep one authoritative home for each active claim. Do not accumulate competing summaries. When a later statement differs, establish whether it is a correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before updating the working account.\n\n## Workpiece template\n\n```markdown\n# Process-Model Workpiece\n\n## Purpose and posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\n\n### Who will use it and how\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n\n### Available time and assumption appetite\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; record its ordering in the process spine.\n\n### Case and process spine\n\nGive the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary: what admits the case, what flows, which activities occur and in what order, what changes the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the work and resources, and what outcome or handoff ends it.\n\n#### Primary case: \n\n##### Trigger or admission\n\n##### Ordered account and references\n\n##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes\n\n##### Objective dependencies\n\n#### Additional or contrasting case: \n\nAdd only when a different case exposes consequential structure the primary case does not.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\n### Validation evidence and data sources\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\nKeep evidence beside affected process material where practical. Use this section for evidence spanning several parts of the account or whose relationship needs explanation.\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\n### Normalized account\n\n### Agent inferences and proposed structure\n\n## Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nFor each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked.\n\n### Unknown to the person\n\n### Not yet asked\n\n### Declined\n\n### Deferred and deposits\n\nFor each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it.\n\n### Ambiguities and conflicts\n\nPreserve alternatives and the evidence for each. Do not choose or average without support.\n\n### Corrections\n\nState the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active.\n\n### Contextual coexistence\n\nPreserve accounts differing by person, time, condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one.\n\n### Deliberate omissions and simplifications\n\nState what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong.\n\n## Construction review\n\nOpen this section only when construction begins.\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\n### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults\n\n### Questions reopened by construction\n\n### Target-representation and tooling losses\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\n### Net status and tool evidence\n```\n\n## Maintenance\n\n- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions.\n- Update the authoritative process spine when ordering or case behavior changes; reference activity and resource entries rather than duplicating their local details.\n- A restatement offered by the agent remains normalization even when accepted. Preserve exact evidence separately where origin matters.\n- For a genuine correction, update the active account and record what changed. For conflict or contextual coexistence, keep the alternatives and their unresolved or selecting conditions visible.\n- Remove irrelevant empty sections. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, or **Omitted** only when that state matters to later work.\n- If construction requires transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that boundary.\n- Record whether no construction was attempted, construction was blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone.\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [ + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "sha256": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "sha256": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf" + }, + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md", + "sha256": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9" + } + ], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 2201, + "inputTokens": 2408, + "outputTokens": 179, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 2587, + "cost": 0.003303 + }, + { + "durationMs": 4717, + "inputTokens": 3771, + "outputTokens": 415, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 4186, + "cost": 0.005846 + }, + { + "durationMs": 4342, + "inputTokens": 14, + "outputTokens": 264, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 11992, + "totalTokens": 12270, + "cost": 0.016323999999999998 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 11260, + "inputTokens": 6193, + "outputTokens": 858, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 11992, + "totalTokens": 19043, + "cost": 0.025472999999999996 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nHelp me model our approval process as an SDCPN.\n\n## Assistant\nI'll help you develop a process model for your approval workflow. Let me first activate the specialized modelling guidance.I need to read the modelling guidance before we start eliciting your approval process details.Good. Now I can help you model your approval process. Let me start by understanding what you need this model to help you decide or answer.\n\n**What question or decision would this model help you address?** For example, are you looking to understand bottlenecks, estimate how long approvals take, compare different approval strategies, check whether a policy is being followed, estimate resource needs, or something else?\n- tool activate_skill (toolu_01GQRK3SU3Kkm5wFpezLtStr): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\\n\\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\\n\\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\\n\\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\\n\\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (toolu_018uH9UBJotzLEtWRVykDvMx): \"# Universal Elicitation Reference\\n\\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\\n\\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Work from purpose\\n\\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\\n\\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\\n\\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\\n\\n### Follow the person's account\\n\\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\\n\\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\\n\\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\\n\\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\\n\\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\\n\\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\\n\\n### Treat divergence as information\\n\\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\\n\\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\\n\\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\\n\\n### Stop honestly\\n\\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\\n\\n### Vague or compressed language\\n\\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\\n\\n### Normative language\\n\\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\\n\\n### Tension within or between accounts\\n\\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\\n\\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\\n\\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\\n\\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\\n\\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\\n\\n### Diminishing yield\\n\\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\\n\\n### Assent without independent wording\\n\\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\\n\\n### Silence and absence\\n\\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\\n\\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\\n\\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\\n\\n### Slice a concrete case\\n\\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\\n\\n### Sweep one property\\n\\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\\n\\n### Ask for the last occurrence\\n\\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\\n\\n### Ask for the basis\\n\\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\\n\\n### Ground a term or artifact\\n\\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\\n\\n### Clarify until observable\\n\\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\\n\\n### Use contrastive cases\\n\\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\\n\\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\\n\\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\\n\\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\\n\\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\\n\\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\\n\\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\\n\\n### Restate for correction\\n\\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\\n\\n### Propose structure for correction\\n\\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\\n\\n### Deposit and defer\\n\\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\\n\\n### Press without trapping\\n\\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\\n\\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\\n\\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\\n\\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\\n\\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\\n\\n### Trade concrete outcomes\\n\\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\\n\\n### Close with one correction opportunity\\n\\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\\n\\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\\n\\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\\n\\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\\n\\n### Before asking\\n\\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\\n\\n### Before recording\\n\\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\\n\\n### Before closing\\n\\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (toolu_019NQptTaRGzah17REYVzjMp): \"# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\\n\\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\\n\\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\\n\\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\\n\\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\\n\\n### Keep target structure backstage\\n\\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\\n\\n### Preserve operational context\\n\\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\\n\\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\\n\\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\\n\\n### Language and account signals\\n\\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\\n\\n### Operational situation patterns\\n\\n#### Timed work\\n\\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\\n\\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\\n\\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\\n\\n#### Contended resource\\n\\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\\n\\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\\n\\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\\n\\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\\n\\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\\n\\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\\n\\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\\n\\n#### Mode change\\n\\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\\n\\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\\n\\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\\n\\n#### Spatial transfer\\n\\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\\n\\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\\n\\n#### Policy under pressure\\n\\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\\n\\n#### Hidden waiting\\n\\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\\n\\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\\n\\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\\n\\n### Link the slice to the objective\\n\\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\\n\\n### Expose the process spine\\n\\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\\n\\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\\n\\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\\n\\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\\n\\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\\n\\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\\n\\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\\n\\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\\n\\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\\n\\n### Close a resource account\\n\\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\\n\\n### Close a mode change in both directions\\n\\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\\n\\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\\n\\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\\n\\n### Ask what is conserved\\n\\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\\n\\n### Establish retry scope\\n\\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\\n\\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\\n\\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\\n\\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\\n\\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\\n\\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\\n\\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\\n\\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\\n\\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\\n\\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\\n\\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\\n\\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\\n\\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\\n\\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\\n\\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\\n\\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\\n\\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\\n\\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\\n\\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\\n\\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\\n\\n### Purpose and process\\n\\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\\n\\n### Operational semantics\\n\\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\\n\\n### Quantities and context\\n\\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (toolu_019hsn6RYAPQyKdWPJopLaej): \"# Process-Model Workpiece and Recording Contract\\n\\nThe workpiece is the shared, recoverable operational account. Elicitation and revision maintain it; construction consumes it. The transcript remains evidence, not the primary model.\\n\\nFollow the person's thread during conversation and file material into the workpiece afterward. Its headings are recording homes, not question order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose, while keeping consequential omissions visible.\\n\\n## Recording distinctions\\n\\nUse these distinctions wherever they carry information; they are not mandatory labels on every sentence:\\n\\n- **Expert evidence** — What the person said, preserving consequential vocabulary, hedges, context, and source regime.\\n- **Working account** — The current normalized operational description accepted for use.\\n- **Agent inference** — An interpretation of evidence, visibly attributed to the agent.\\n- **Assumed** — A value or structure proposed by the agent, with its reason, consequence, and route to checking.\\n- **Unknown** — Asked, but the person does not know.\\n- **Not yet asked** — Relevant and identified, but not yet addressed.\\n- **Deferred** — Left for later, with why it matters and a named source or route to an answer.\\n- **Declined** — The person chose not to answer or include it.\\n- **Conflict** — Accounts cannot yet be used together; preserve both and what could distinguish them.\\n- **Correction** — A current account that replaces an earlier one, retaining enough history to explain the change without leaving both active.\\n- **Contextual coexistence** — Different accounts apply under different people, times, modes, directions, policies, or operating conditions.\\n- **Omitted** — Deliberately outside the model, with why the purpose permits the omission.\\n- **Target loss** — Supported operational meaning the SDCPN or current tools cannot faithfully carry.\\n\\nEvidence and precision are independent. “About three hours” may be supported but coarse; an exact agent-supplied value may be precise-looking but unsupported.\\n\\nKeep one authoritative home for each active claim. Do not accumulate competing summaries. When a later statement differs, establish whether it is a correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before updating the working account.\\n\\n## Workpiece template\\n\\n```markdown\\n# Process-Model Workpiece\\n\\n## Purpose and posture\\n\\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\\n\\n### Who will use it and how\\n\\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\\n\\n### Available time and assumption appetite\\n\\n### What the result must not claim\\n\\n## Operational account\\n\\n### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\\n\\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\\n\\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\\n\\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\\n\\nFor each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; record its ordering in the process spine.\\n\\n### Case and process spine\\n\\nGive the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary: what admits the case, what flows, which activities occur and in what order, what changes the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the work and resources, and what outcome or handoff ends it.\\n\\n#### Primary case: \\n\\n##### Trigger or admission\\n\\n##### Ordered account and references\\n\\n##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes\\n\\n##### Objective dependencies\\n\\n#### Additional or contrasting case: \\n\\nAdd only when a different case exposes consequential structure the primary case does not.\\n\\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\\n\\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\\n\\n### Validation evidence and data sources\\n\\n## Evidence and interpretation\\n\\nKeep evidence beside affected process material where practical. Use this section for evidence spanning several parts of the account or whose relationship needs explanation.\\n\\n### Exact expert evidence\\n\\n### Normalized account\\n\\n### Agent inferences and proposed structure\\n\\n## Open matters and authorship\\n\\n### Assumptions\\n\\nFor each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked.\\n\\n### Unknown to the person\\n\\n### Not yet asked\\n\\n### Declined\\n\\n### Deferred and deposits\\n\\nFor each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it.\\n\\n### Ambiguities and conflicts\\n\\nPreserve alternatives and the evidence for each. Do not choose or average without support.\\n\\n### Corrections\\n\\nState the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active.\\n\\n### Contextual coexistence\\n\\nPreserve accounts differing by person, time, condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one.\\n\\n### Deliberate omissions and simplifications\\n\\nState what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong.\\n\\n## Construction review\\n\\nOpen this section only when construction begins.\\n\\n### Candidate target structures\\n\\n### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults\\n\\n### Questions reopened by construction\\n\\n### Target-representation and tooling losses\\n\\n## Delivery status\\n\\n### What this workpiece currently supports\\n\\n### Consequential gaps\\n\\n### Net status and tool evidence\\n```\\n\\n## Maintenance\\n\\n- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions.\\n- Update the authoritative process spine when ordering or case behavior changes; reference activity and resource entries rather than duplicating their local details.\\n- A restatement offered by the agent remains normalization even when accepted. Preserve exact evidence separately where origin matters.\\n- For a genuine correction, update the active account and record what changed. For conflict or contextual coexistence, keep the alternatives and their unresolved or selecting conditions visible.\\n- Remove irrelevant empty sections. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, or **Omitted** only when that state matters to later work.\\n- If construction requires transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that boundary.\\n- Record whether no construction was attempted, construction was blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone.\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000041", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFGMEpSVlMxVlhNMjdTUjFQRjFINzFY", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1F0JSKVN6KP242AH2AY4SJ6", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JRWQ65P2SYKC5Q9X85E2", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net) in Petrinaut. According to my instructions, I should activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation. This is a process-modelling task, so I need to load those specialized instructions first.\n\nLet me activate that skill now.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'll help you develop a process model for your approval workflow. Let me first activate the specialized modelling guidance.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01GQRK3SU3Kkm5wFpezLtStr", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 4 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good, I've loaded the skill. Now according to the instructions, I need to:\n\n1. Orient first - establish purpose and context\n2. The skill instructions mention a \"required disclosure gate\" - if human knowledge is required that available evidence doesn't contain, I need to read the universal-elicitation.md and sdcpn-elicitation.md files before asking questions.\n\nSince the user has just made an initial request without providing details about their specific approval process, I will need to ask questions to elicit how their approval process works. This definitely requires human knowledge I don't have.\n\nLet me follow the required disclosure procedure and read the guidance documents.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I need to read the modelling guidance before we start eliciting your approval process details.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_018uH9UBJotzLEtWRVykDvMx", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n", + "durationMs": 3 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_019NQptTaRGzah17REYVzjMp", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_019hsn6RYAPQyKdWPJopLaej", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md" + }, + "output": "# Process-Model Workpiece and Recording Contract\n\nThe workpiece is the shared, recoverable operational account. Elicitation and revision maintain it; construction consumes it. The transcript remains evidence, not the primary model.\n\nFollow the person's thread during conversation and file material into the workpiece afterward. Its headings are recording homes, not question order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose, while keeping consequential omissions visible.\n\n## Recording distinctions\n\nUse these distinctions wherever they carry information; they are not mandatory labels on every sentence:\n\n- **Expert evidence** — What the person said, preserving consequential vocabulary, hedges, context, and source regime.\n- **Working account** — The current normalized operational description accepted for use.\n- **Agent inference** — An interpretation of evidence, visibly attributed to the agent.\n- **Assumed** — A value or structure proposed by the agent, with its reason, consequence, and route to checking.\n- **Unknown** — Asked, but the person does not know.\n- **Not yet asked** — Relevant and identified, but not yet addressed.\n- **Deferred** — Left for later, with why it matters and a named source or route to an answer.\n- **Declined** — The person chose not to answer or include it.\n- **Conflict** — Accounts cannot yet be used together; preserve both and what could distinguish them.\n- **Correction** — A current account that replaces an earlier one, retaining enough history to explain the change without leaving both active.\n- **Contextual coexistence** — Different accounts apply under different people, times, modes, directions, policies, or operating conditions.\n- **Omitted** — Deliberately outside the model, with why the purpose permits the omission.\n- **Target loss** — Supported operational meaning the SDCPN or current tools cannot faithfully carry.\n\nEvidence and precision are independent. “About three hours” may be supported but coarse; an exact agent-supplied value may be precise-looking but unsupported.\n\nKeep one authoritative home for each active claim. Do not accumulate competing summaries. When a later statement differs, establish whether it is a correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before updating the working account.\n\n## Workpiece template\n\n```markdown\n# Process-Model Workpiece\n\n## Purpose and posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\n\n### Who will use it and how\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n\n### Available time and assumption appetite\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; record its ordering in the process spine.\n\n### Case and process spine\n\nGive the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary: what admits the case, what flows, which activities occur and in what order, what changes the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the work and resources, and what outcome or handoff ends it.\n\n#### Primary case: \n\n##### Trigger or admission\n\n##### Ordered account and references\n\n##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes\n\n##### Objective dependencies\n\n#### Additional or contrasting case: \n\nAdd only when a different case exposes consequential structure the primary case does not.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\n### Validation evidence and data sources\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\nKeep evidence beside affected process material where practical. Use this section for evidence spanning several parts of the account or whose relationship needs explanation.\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\n### Normalized account\n\n### Agent inferences and proposed structure\n\n## Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nFor each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked.\n\n### Unknown to the person\n\n### Not yet asked\n\n### Declined\n\n### Deferred and deposits\n\nFor each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it.\n\n### Ambiguities and conflicts\n\nPreserve alternatives and the evidence for each. Do not choose or average without support.\n\n### Corrections\n\nState the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active.\n\n### Contextual coexistence\n\nPreserve accounts differing by person, time, condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one.\n\n### Deliberate omissions and simplifications\n\nState what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong.\n\n## Construction review\n\nOpen this section only when construction begins.\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\n### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults\n\n### Questions reopened by construction\n\n### Target-representation and tooling losses\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\n### Net status and tool evidence\n```\n\n## Maintenance\n\n- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions.\n- Update the authoritative process spine when ordering or case behavior changes; reference activity and resource entries rather than duplicating their local details.\n- A restatement offered by the agent remains normalization even when accepted. Preserve exact evidence separately where origin matters.\n- For a genuine correction, update the active account and record what changed. For conflict or contextual coexistence, keep the alternatives and their unresolved or selecting conditions visible.\n- Remove irrelevant empty sections. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, or **Omitted** only when that state matters to later work.\n- If construction requires transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that boundary.\n- Record whether no construction was attempted, construction was blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good, I've now read the guidance. Now I need to orient before asking questions. Let me establish:\n\n1. What the model must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change\n2. Who will use it and how\n3. The boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n4. What time they have\n5. What assumptions they're willing to make\n\nThen I need to follow one concrete case, using their vocabulary, building from the operational account.\n\nThe person said \"our approval process\" so they have an operational approval process they want to model. I should start by understanding what this model is for - what question does it need to answer? Is it performance analysis? Bottleneck finding? Compliance checking? Cost reduction?\n\nLet me open with one focused question about purpose.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good. Now I can help you model your approval process. Let me start by understanding what you need this model to help you decide or answer.\n\n**What question or decision would this model help you address?** For example, are you looking to understand bottlenecks, estimate how long approvals take, compare different approval strategies, check whether a policy is being followed, estimate resource needs, or something else?", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1F0JRVTASECNBRRJHCEZY1S" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:28.731Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:28.734Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:28.754Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:28.759Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JRWQ65P2SYKC5Q9X85E2", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:28.759Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JRWQ65P2SYKC5Q9X85E2", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:28.759Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284068770 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JRWQ65P2SYKC5Q9X85E2", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:29.500Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JRWQ65P2SYKC5Q9X85E2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:29.502Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "The user wants", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JRWQ65P2SYKC5Q9X85E2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:30.375Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net) in Petrinaut. According to my", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JRWQ65P2SYKC5Q9X85E2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:30.375Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " instructions, I should activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation. This is a process-modelling task, so I need", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JRWQ65P2SYKC5Q9X85E2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:30.375Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " to load those specialized instructions first.\n\nLet me activate that skill now.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JRWQ65P2SYKC5Q9X85E2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:30.375Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net) in Petrinaut. According to my instructions, I should activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation. This is a process-modelling task, so I need to load those specialized instructions first.\n\nLet me activate that skill now.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JRWQ65P2SYKC5Q9X85E2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:30.376Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "I'll help you develop a process model for your approval workflow.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JRWQ65P2SYKC5Q9X85E2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:30.725Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " Let me first activate the specialized modelling guidance.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JRWQ65P2SYKC5Q9X85E2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:30.725Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01GQRK3SU3Kkm5wFpezLtStr", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JRWQ65P2SYKC5Q9X85E2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:30.727Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01GQRK3SU3Kkm5wFpezLtStr", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\": \"sdcpn-modelling", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JRWQ65P2SYKC5Q9X85E2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:30.945Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01GQRK3SU3Kkm5wFpezLtStr", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JRWQ65P2SYKC5Q9X85E2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:30.945Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JRWQ65P2SYKC5Q9X85E2", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 2201, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced82V7pF33qsxseVSzJZ", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net) in Petrinaut. According to my instructions, I should activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation. This is a process-modelling task, so I need to load those specialized instructions first.\n\nLet me activate that skill now.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'll help you develop a process model for your approval workflow. Let me first activate the specialized modelling guidance." + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01GQRK3SU3Kkm5wFpezLtStr", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2408, + "output": 179, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 2587, + "cost": { + "input": 0.002408, + "output": 0.0008950000000000001, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.003303 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:30.960Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net) in Petrinaut. According to my instructions, I should activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation. This is a process-modelling task, so I need to load those specialized instructions first.\n\nLet me activate that skill now.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'll help you develop a process model for your approval workflow. Let me first activate the specialized modelling guidance." + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01GQRK3SU3Kkm5wFpezLtStr", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2408, + "output": 179, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 2587, + "cost": { + "input": 0.002408, + "output": 0.0008950000000000001, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.003303 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 93 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284068770, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced82V7pF33qsxseVSzJZ", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JRWQ65P2SYKC5Q9X85E2", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:30.961Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01GQRK3SU3Kkm5wFpezLtStr", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JRWQ65P2SYKC5Q9X85E2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:30.962Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01GQRK3SU3Kkm5wFpezLtStr", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284070965 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JRWQ65P2SYKC5Q9X85E2", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:30.965Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01GQRK3SU3Kkm5wFpezLtStr", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284070965 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JRWQ65P2SYKC5Q9X85E2", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:30.965Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01GQRK3SU3Kkm5wFpezLtStr", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 4, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JRWQ65P2SYKC5Q9X85E2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:30.966Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JRWQ65P2SYKC5Q9X85E2", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net) in Petrinaut. According to my instructions, I should activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation. This is a process-modelling task, so I need to load those specialized instructions first.\n\nLet me activate that skill now.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'll help you develop a process model for your approval workflow. Let me first activate the specialized modelling guidance." + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01GQRK3SU3Kkm5wFpezLtStr", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2408, + "output": 179, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 2587, + "cost": { + "input": 0.002408, + "output": 0.0008950000000000001, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.003303 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 93 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284068770, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced82V7pF33qsxseVSzJZ", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01GQRK3SU3Kkm5wFpezLtStr", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284070965 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:30.966Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:30.967Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net) in Petrinaut. According to my instructions, I should activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation. This is a process-modelling task, so I need to load those specialized instructions first.\n\nLet me activate that skill now.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'll help you develop a process model for your approval workflow. Let me first activate the specialized modelling guidance." + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01GQRK3SU3Kkm5wFpezLtStr", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01GQRK3SU3Kkm5wFpezLtStr", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:30.967Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284070968 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:31.824Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:31.826Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "Good", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:32.828Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ", I've loaded", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:32.828Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " the skill. Now according to the instructions, I need to:\n\n1. Orient first - establish purpose and context\n2. The skill instructions", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:32.828Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " mention a \"required disclosure gate\" - if human knowledge is required that available evidence", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:32.828Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " doesn't contain, I need to read the universal-elicitation.md and sdcpn-elicitation.md files before asking questions.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:32.828Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "\n\nSince the user has just made an initial request without providing details about their specific approval", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:33.766Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " process, I will need to ask questions to elicit how their approval process works. This definitely requires human knowledge I", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:33.766Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " don't have.\n\nLet me follow the required disclosure procedure and read the guidance documents.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:33.766Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "Good, I've loaded the skill. Now according to the instructions, I need to:\n\n1. Orient first - establish purpose and context\n2. The skill instructions mention a \"required disclosure gate\" - if human knowledge is required that available evidence doesn't contain, I need to read the universal-elicitation.md and sdcpn-elicitation.md files before asking questions.\n\nSince the user has just made an initial request without providing details about their specific approval process, I will need to ask questions to elicit how their approval process works. This definitely requires human knowledge I don't have.\n\nLet me follow the required disclosure procedure and read the guidance documents.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:33.766Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "I need to read the modelling guidance before", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:34.121Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " we start eliciting your approval process details.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:34.121Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_018uH9UBJotzLEtWRVykDvMx", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:34.123Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_018uH9UBJotzLEtWRVykDvMx", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\": \"/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:34.513Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_018uH9UBJotzLEtWRVykDvMx", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "-elicitation.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:34.824Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_018uH9UBJotzLEtWRVykDvMx", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:34.824Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_019NQptTaRGzah17REYVzjMp", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:34.825Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_019NQptTaRGzah17REYVzjMp", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\": \"/.flue/packaged-skills/skill", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:34.825Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_019NQptTaRGzah17REYVzjMp", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:35.128Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_019NQptTaRGzah17REYVzjMp", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:35.547Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_019hsn6RYAPQyKdWPJopLaej", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:35.548Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_019hsn6RYAPQyKdWPJopLaej", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\": \"/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:35.548Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_019hsn6RYAPQyKdWPJopLaej", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "31/workpiece-template.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:35.651Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_019hsn6RYAPQyKdWPJopLaej", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:35.651Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4717, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced82ecZV43NEKiaLrRHh", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, I've loaded the skill. Now according to the instructions, I need to:\n\n1. Orient first - establish purpose and context\n2. The skill instructions mention a \"required disclosure gate\" - if human knowledge is required that available evidence doesn't contain, I need to read the universal-elicitation.md and sdcpn-elicitation.md files before asking questions.\n\nSince the user has just made an initial request without providing details about their specific approval process, I will need to ask questions to elicit how their approval process works. This definitely requires human knowledge I don't have.\n\nLet me follow the required disclosure procedure and read the guidance documents.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I need to read the modelling guidance before we start eliciting your approval process details." + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_018uH9UBJotzLEtWRVykDvMx", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_019NQptTaRGzah17REYVzjMp", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_019hsn6RYAPQyKdWPJopLaej", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3771, + "output": 415, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 4186, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0037709999999999996, + "output": 0.002075, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005846 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:35.684Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, I've loaded the skill. Now according to the instructions, I need to:\n\n1. Orient first - establish purpose and context\n2. The skill instructions mention a \"required disclosure gate\" - if human knowledge is required that available evidence doesn't contain, I need to read the universal-elicitation.md and sdcpn-elicitation.md files before asking questions.\n\nSince the user has just made an initial request without providing details about their specific approval process, I will need to ask questions to elicit how their approval process works. This definitely requires human knowledge I don't have.\n\nLet me follow the required disclosure procedure and read the guidance documents.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I need to read the modelling guidance before we start eliciting your approval process details." + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_018uH9UBJotzLEtWRVykDvMx", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_019NQptTaRGzah17REYVzjMp", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_019hsn6RYAPQyKdWPJopLaej", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3771, + "output": 415, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 4186, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0037709999999999996, + "output": 0.002075, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005846 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 145 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284070968, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced82ecZV43NEKiaLrRHh", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:35.684Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_018uH9UBJotzLEtWRVykDvMx", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:35.685Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_019NQptTaRGzah17REYVzjMp", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:35.685Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_019hsn6RYAPQyKdWPJopLaej", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:35.685Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_018uH9UBJotzLEtWRVykDvMx", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284075688 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:35.688Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_018uH9UBJotzLEtWRVykDvMx", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284075688 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 57, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:35.688Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_019NQptTaRGzah17REYVzjMp", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284075688 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 58, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:35.688Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_019NQptTaRGzah17REYVzjMp", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284075688 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 59, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:35.688Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_019hsn6RYAPQyKdWPJopLaej", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Process-Model Workpiece and Recording Contract\n\nThe workpiece is the shared, recoverable operational account. Elicitation and revision maintain it; construction consumes it. The transcript remains evidence, not the primary model.\n\nFollow the person's thread during conversation and file material into the workpiece afterward. Its headings are recording homes, not question order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose, while keeping consequential omissions visible.\n\n## Recording distinctions\n\nUse these distinctions wherever they carry information; they are not mandatory labels on every sentence:\n\n- **Expert evidence** — What the person said, preserving consequential vocabulary, hedges, context, and source regime.\n- **Working account** — The current normalized operational description accepted for use.\n- **Agent inference** — An interpretation of evidence, visibly attributed to the agent.\n- **Assumed** — A value or structure proposed by the agent, with its reason, consequence, and route to checking.\n- **Unknown** — Asked, but the person does not know.\n- **Not yet asked** — Relevant and identified, but not yet addressed.\n- **Deferred** — Left for later, with why it matters and a named source or route to an answer.\n- **Declined** — The person chose not to answer or include it.\n- **Conflict** — Accounts cannot yet be used together; preserve both and what could distinguish them.\n- **Correction** — A current account that replaces an earlier one, retaining enough history to explain the change without leaving both active.\n- **Contextual coexistence** — Different accounts apply under different people, times, modes, directions, policies, or operating conditions.\n- **Omitted** — Deliberately outside the model, with why the purpose permits the omission.\n- **Target loss** — Supported operational meaning the SDCPN or current tools cannot faithfully carry.\n\nEvidence and precision are independent. “About three hours” may be supported but coarse; an exact agent-supplied value may be precise-looking but unsupported.\n\nKeep one authoritative home for each active claim. Do not accumulate competing summaries. When a later statement differs, establish whether it is a correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before updating the working account.\n\n## Workpiece template\n\n```markdown\n# Process-Model Workpiece\n\n## Purpose and posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\n\n### Who will use it and how\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n\n### Available time and assumption appetite\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; record its ordering in the process spine.\n\n### Case and process spine\n\nGive the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary: what admits the case, what flows, which activities occur and in what order, what changes the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the work and resources, and what outcome or handoff ends it.\n\n#### Primary case: \n\n##### Trigger or admission\n\n##### Ordered account and references\n\n##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes\n\n##### Objective dependencies\n\n#### Additional or contrasting case: \n\nAdd only when a different case exposes consequential structure the primary case does not.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\n### Validation evidence and data sources\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\nKeep evidence beside affected process material where practical. Use this section for evidence spanning several parts of the account or whose relationship needs explanation.\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\n### Normalized account\n\n### Agent inferences and proposed structure\n\n## Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nFor each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked.\n\n### Unknown to the person\n\n### Not yet asked\n\n### Declined\n\n### Deferred and deposits\n\nFor each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it.\n\n### Ambiguities and conflicts\n\nPreserve alternatives and the evidence for each. Do not choose or average without support.\n\n### Corrections\n\nState the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active.\n\n### Contextual coexistence\n\nPreserve accounts differing by person, time, condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one.\n\n### Deliberate omissions and simplifications\n\nState what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong.\n\n## Construction review\n\nOpen this section only when construction begins.\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\n### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults\n\n### Questions reopened by construction\n\n### Target-representation and tooling losses\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\n### Net status and tool evidence\n```\n\n## Maintenance\n\n- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions.\n- Update the authoritative process spine when ordering or case behavior changes; reference activity and resource entries rather than duplicating their local details.\n- A restatement offered by the agent remains normalization even when accepted. Preserve exact evidence separately where origin matters.\n- For a genuine correction, update the active account and record what changed. For conflict or contextual coexistence, keep the alternatives and their unresolved or selecting conditions visible.\n- Remove irrelevant empty sections. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, or **Omitted** only when that state matters to later work.\n- If construction requires transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that boundary.\n- Record whether no construction was attempted, construction was blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md", + "lines": 154 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284075688 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 60, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:35.688Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_019hsn6RYAPQyKdWPJopLaej", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Process-Model Workpiece and Recording Contract\n\nThe workpiece is the shared, recoverable operational account. Elicitation and revision maintain it; construction consumes it. The transcript remains evidence, not the primary model.\n\nFollow the person's thread during conversation and file material into the workpiece afterward. Its headings are recording homes, not question order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose, while keeping consequential omissions visible.\n\n## Recording distinctions\n\nUse these distinctions wherever they carry information; they are not mandatory labels on every sentence:\n\n- **Expert evidence** — What the person said, preserving consequential vocabulary, hedges, context, and source regime.\n- **Working account** — The current normalized operational description accepted for use.\n- **Agent inference** — An interpretation of evidence, visibly attributed to the agent.\n- **Assumed** — A value or structure proposed by the agent, with its reason, consequence, and route to checking.\n- **Unknown** — Asked, but the person does not know.\n- **Not yet asked** — Relevant and identified, but not yet addressed.\n- **Deferred** — Left for later, with why it matters and a named source or route to an answer.\n- **Declined** — The person chose not to answer or include it.\n- **Conflict** — Accounts cannot yet be used together; preserve both and what could distinguish them.\n- **Correction** — A current account that replaces an earlier one, retaining enough history to explain the change without leaving both active.\n- **Contextual coexistence** — Different accounts apply under different people, times, modes, directions, policies, or operating conditions.\n- **Omitted** — Deliberately outside the model, with why the purpose permits the omission.\n- **Target loss** — Supported operational meaning the SDCPN or current tools cannot faithfully carry.\n\nEvidence and precision are independent. “About three hours” may be supported but coarse; an exact agent-supplied value may be precise-looking but unsupported.\n\nKeep one authoritative home for each active claim. Do not accumulate competing summaries. When a later statement differs, establish whether it is a correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before updating the working account.\n\n## Workpiece template\n\n```markdown\n# Process-Model Workpiece\n\n## Purpose and posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\n\n### Who will use it and how\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n\n### Available time and assumption appetite\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; record its ordering in the process spine.\n\n### Case and process spine\n\nGive the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary: what admits the case, what flows, which activities occur and in what order, what changes the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the work and resources, and what outcome or handoff ends it.\n\n#### Primary case: \n\n##### Trigger or admission\n\n##### Ordered account and references\n\n##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes\n\n##### Objective dependencies\n\n#### Additional or contrasting case: \n\nAdd only when a different case exposes consequential structure the primary case does not.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\n### Validation evidence and data sources\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\nKeep evidence beside affected process material where practical. Use this section for evidence spanning several parts of the account or whose relationship needs explanation.\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\n### Normalized account\n\n### Agent inferences and proposed structure\n\n## Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nFor each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked.\n\n### Unknown to the person\n\n### Not yet asked\n\n### Declined\n\n### Deferred and deposits\n\nFor each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it.\n\n### Ambiguities and conflicts\n\nPreserve alternatives and the evidence for each. Do not choose or average without support.\n\n### Corrections\n\nState the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active.\n\n### Contextual coexistence\n\nPreserve accounts differing by person, time, condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one.\n\n### Deliberate omissions and simplifications\n\nState what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong.\n\n## Construction review\n\nOpen this section only when construction begins.\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\n### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults\n\n### Questions reopened by construction\n\n### Target-representation and tooling losses\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\n### Net status and tool evidence\n```\n\n## Maintenance\n\n- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions.\n- Update the authoritative process spine when ordering or case behavior changes; reference activity and resource entries rather than duplicating their local details.\n- A restatement offered by the agent remains normalization even when accepted. Preserve exact evidence separately where origin matters.\n- For a genuine correction, update the active account and record what changed. For conflict or contextual coexistence, keep the alternatives and their unresolved or selecting conditions visible.\n- Remove irrelevant empty sections. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, or **Omitted** only when that state matters to later work.\n- If construction requires transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that boundary.\n- Record whether no construction was attempted, construction was blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md", + "lines": 154 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284075688 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 61, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:35.688Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_018uH9UBJotzLEtWRVykDvMx", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + } + }, + "durationMs": 3, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 62, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:35.690Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_019NQptTaRGzah17REYVzjMp", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + } + }, + "durationMs": 2, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 63, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:35.690Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_019hsn6RYAPQyKdWPJopLaej", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Process-Model Workpiece and Recording Contract\n\nThe workpiece is the shared, recoverable operational account. Elicitation and revision maintain it; construction consumes it. The transcript remains evidence, not the primary model.\n\nFollow the person's thread during conversation and file material into the workpiece afterward. Its headings are recording homes, not question order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose, while keeping consequential omissions visible.\n\n## Recording distinctions\n\nUse these distinctions wherever they carry information; they are not mandatory labels on every sentence:\n\n- **Expert evidence** — What the person said, preserving consequential vocabulary, hedges, context, and source regime.\n- **Working account** — The current normalized operational description accepted for use.\n- **Agent inference** — An interpretation of evidence, visibly attributed to the agent.\n- **Assumed** — A value or structure proposed by the agent, with its reason, consequence, and route to checking.\n- **Unknown** — Asked, but the person does not know.\n- **Not yet asked** — Relevant and identified, but not yet addressed.\n- **Deferred** — Left for later, with why it matters and a named source or route to an answer.\n- **Declined** — The person chose not to answer or include it.\n- **Conflict** — Accounts cannot yet be used together; preserve both and what could distinguish them.\n- **Correction** — A current account that replaces an earlier one, retaining enough history to explain the change without leaving both active.\n- **Contextual coexistence** — Different accounts apply under different people, times, modes, directions, policies, or operating conditions.\n- **Omitted** — Deliberately outside the model, with why the purpose permits the omission.\n- **Target loss** — Supported operational meaning the SDCPN or current tools cannot faithfully carry.\n\nEvidence and precision are independent. “About three hours” may be supported but coarse; an exact agent-supplied value may be precise-looking but unsupported.\n\nKeep one authoritative home for each active claim. Do not accumulate competing summaries. When a later statement differs, establish whether it is a correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before updating the working account.\n\n## Workpiece template\n\n```markdown\n# Process-Model Workpiece\n\n## Purpose and posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\n\n### Who will use it and how\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n\n### Available time and assumption appetite\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; record its ordering in the process spine.\n\n### Case and process spine\n\nGive the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary: what admits the case, what flows, which activities occur and in what order, what changes the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the work and resources, and what outcome or handoff ends it.\n\n#### Primary case: \n\n##### Trigger or admission\n\n##### Ordered account and references\n\n##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes\n\n##### Objective dependencies\n\n#### Additional or contrasting case: \n\nAdd only when a different case exposes consequential structure the primary case does not.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\n### Validation evidence and data sources\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\nKeep evidence beside affected process material where practical. Use this section for evidence spanning several parts of the account or whose relationship needs explanation.\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\n### Normalized account\n\n### Agent inferences and proposed structure\n\n## Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nFor each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked.\n\n### Unknown to the person\n\n### Not yet asked\n\n### Declined\n\n### Deferred and deposits\n\nFor each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it.\n\n### Ambiguities and conflicts\n\nPreserve alternatives and the evidence for each. Do not choose or average without support.\n\n### Corrections\n\nState the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active.\n\n### Contextual coexistence\n\nPreserve accounts differing by person, time, condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one.\n\n### Deliberate omissions and simplifications\n\nState what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong.\n\n## Construction review\n\nOpen this section only when construction begins.\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\n### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults\n\n### Questions reopened by construction\n\n### Target-representation and tooling losses\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\n### Net status and tool evidence\n```\n\n## Maintenance\n\n- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions.\n- Update the authoritative process spine when ordering or case behavior changes; reference activity and resource entries rather than duplicating their local details.\n- A restatement offered by the agent remains normalization even when accepted. Preserve exact evidence separately where origin matters.\n- For a genuine correction, update the active account and record what changed. For conflict or contextual coexistence, keep the alternatives and their unresolved or selecting conditions visible.\n- Remove irrelevant empty sections. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, or **Omitted** only when that state matters to later work.\n- If construction requires transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that boundary.\n- Record whether no construction was attempted, construction was blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md", + "lines": 154 + } + }, + "durationMs": 2, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 64, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:35.691Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Process-Model Workpiece and Recording Contract\n\nThe workpiece is the shared, recoverable operational account. Elicitation and revision maintain it; construction consumes it. The transcript remains evidence, not the primary model.\n\nFollow the person's thread during conversation and file material into the workpiece afterward. Its headings are recording homes, not question order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose, while keeping consequential omissions visible.\n\n## Recording distinctions\n\nUse these distinctions wherever they carry information; they are not mandatory labels on every sentence:\n\n- **Expert evidence** — What the person said, preserving consequential vocabulary, hedges, context, and source regime.\n- **Working account** — The current normalized operational description accepted for use.\n- **Agent inference** — An interpretation of evidence, visibly attributed to the agent.\n- **Assumed** — A value or structure proposed by the agent, with its reason, consequence, and route to checking.\n- **Unknown** — Asked, but the person does not know.\n- **Not yet asked** — Relevant and identified, but not yet addressed.\n- **Deferred** — Left for later, with why it matters and a named source or route to an answer.\n- **Declined** — The person chose not to answer or include it.\n- **Conflict** — Accounts cannot yet be used together; preserve both and what could distinguish them.\n- **Correction** — A current account that replaces an earlier one, retaining enough history to explain the change without leaving both active.\n- **Contextual coexistence** — Different accounts apply under different people, times, modes, directions, policies, or operating conditions.\n- **Omitted** — Deliberately outside the model, with why the purpose permits the omission.\n- **Target loss** — Supported operational meaning the SDCPN or current tools cannot faithfully carry.\n\nEvidence and precision are independent. “About three hours” may be supported but coarse; an exact agent-supplied value may be precise-looking but unsupported.\n\nKeep one authoritative home for each active claim. Do not accumulate competing summaries. When a later statement differs, establish whether it is a correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before updating the working account.\n\n## Workpiece template\n\n```markdown\n# Process-Model Workpiece\n\n## Purpose and posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\n\n### Who will use it and how\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n\n### Available time and assumption appetite\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; record its ordering in the process spine.\n\n### Case and process spine\n\nGive the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary: what admits the case, what flows, which activities occur and in what order, what changes the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the work and resources, and what outcome or handoff ends it.\n\n#### Primary case: \n\n##### Trigger or admission\n\n##### Ordered account and references\n\n##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes\n\n##### Objective dependencies\n\n#### Additional or contrasting case: \n\nAdd only when a different case exposes consequential structure the primary case does not.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\n### Validation evidence and data sources\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\nKeep evidence beside affected process material where practical. Use this section for evidence spanning several parts of the account or whose relationship needs explanation.\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\n### Normalized account\n\n### Agent inferences and proposed structure\n\n## Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nFor each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked.\n\n### Unknown to the person\n\n### Not yet asked\n\n### Declined\n\n### Deferred and deposits\n\nFor each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it.\n\n### Ambiguities and conflicts\n\nPreserve alternatives and the evidence for each. Do not choose or average without support.\n\n### Corrections\n\nState the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active.\n\n### Contextual coexistence\n\nPreserve accounts differing by person, time, condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one.\n\n### Deliberate omissions and simplifications\n\nState what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong.\n\n## Construction review\n\nOpen this section only when construction begins.\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\n### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults\n\n### Questions reopened by construction\n\n### Target-representation and tooling losses\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\n### Net status and tool evidence\n```\n\n## Maintenance\n\n- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions.\n- Update the authoritative process spine when ordering or case behavior changes; reference activity and resource entries rather than duplicating their local details.\n- A restatement offered by the agent remains normalization even when accepted. Preserve exact evidence separately where origin matters.\n- For a genuine correction, update the active account and record what changed. For conflict or contextual coexistence, keep the alternatives and their unresolved or selecting conditions visible.\n- Remove irrelevant empty sections. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, or **Omitted** only when that state matters to later work.\n- If construction requires transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that boundary.\n- Record whether no construction was attempted, construction was blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JV1QXEQ7335PBB4FZPV3", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, I've loaded the skill. Now according to the instructions, I need to:\n\n1. Orient first - establish purpose and context\n2. The skill instructions mention a \"required disclosure gate\" - if human knowledge is required that available evidence doesn't contain, I need to read the universal-elicitation.md and sdcpn-elicitation.md files before asking questions.\n\nSince the user has just made an initial request without providing details about their specific approval process, I will need to ask questions to elicit how their approval process works. This definitely requires human knowledge I don't have.\n\nLet me follow the required disclosure procedure and read the guidance documents.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I need to read the modelling guidance before we start eliciting your approval process details." + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_018uH9UBJotzLEtWRVykDvMx", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_019NQptTaRGzah17REYVzjMp", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_019hsn6RYAPQyKdWPJopLaej", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3771, + "output": 415, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 4186, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0037709999999999996, + "output": 0.002075, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005846 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 145 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284070968, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced82ecZV43NEKiaLrRHh", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_018uH9UBJotzLEtWRVykDvMx", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284075688 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_019NQptTaRGzah17REYVzjMp", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284075688 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_019hsn6RYAPQyKdWPJopLaej", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Process-Model Workpiece and Recording Contract\n\nThe workpiece is the shared, recoverable operational account. Elicitation and revision maintain it; construction consumes it. The transcript remains evidence, not the primary model.\n\nFollow the person's thread during conversation and file material into the workpiece afterward. Its headings are recording homes, not question order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose, while keeping consequential omissions visible.\n\n## Recording distinctions\n\nUse these distinctions wherever they carry information; they are not mandatory labels on every sentence:\n\n- **Expert evidence** — What the person said, preserving consequential vocabulary, hedges, context, and source regime.\n- **Working account** — The current normalized operational description accepted for use.\n- **Agent inference** — An interpretation of evidence, visibly attributed to the agent.\n- **Assumed** — A value or structure proposed by the agent, with its reason, consequence, and route to checking.\n- **Unknown** — Asked, but the person does not know.\n- **Not yet asked** — Relevant and identified, but not yet addressed.\n- **Deferred** — Left for later, with why it matters and a named source or route to an answer.\n- **Declined** — The person chose not to answer or include it.\n- **Conflict** — Accounts cannot yet be used together; preserve both and what could distinguish them.\n- **Correction** — A current account that replaces an earlier one, retaining enough history to explain the change without leaving both active.\n- **Contextual coexistence** — Different accounts apply under different people, times, modes, directions, policies, or operating conditions.\n- **Omitted** — Deliberately outside the model, with why the purpose permits the omission.\n- **Target loss** — Supported operational meaning the SDCPN or current tools cannot faithfully carry.\n\nEvidence and precision are independent. “About three hours” may be supported but coarse; an exact agent-supplied value may be precise-looking but unsupported.\n\nKeep one authoritative home for each active claim. Do not accumulate competing summaries. When a later statement differs, establish whether it is a correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before updating the working account.\n\n## Workpiece template\n\n```markdown\n# Process-Model Workpiece\n\n## Purpose and posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\n\n### Who will use it and how\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n\n### Available time and assumption appetite\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; record its ordering in the process spine.\n\n### Case and process spine\n\nGive the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary: what admits the case, what flows, which activities occur and in what order, what changes the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the work and resources, and what outcome or handoff ends it.\n\n#### Primary case: \n\n##### Trigger or admission\n\n##### Ordered account and references\n\n##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes\n\n##### Objective dependencies\n\n#### Additional or contrasting case: \n\nAdd only when a different case exposes consequential structure the primary case does not.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\n### Validation evidence and data sources\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\nKeep evidence beside affected process material where practical. Use this section for evidence spanning several parts of the account or whose relationship needs explanation.\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\n### Normalized account\n\n### Agent inferences and proposed structure\n\n## Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nFor each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked.\n\n### Unknown to the person\n\n### Not yet asked\n\n### Declined\n\n### Deferred and deposits\n\nFor each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it.\n\n### Ambiguities and conflicts\n\nPreserve alternatives and the evidence for each. Do not choose or average without support.\n\n### Corrections\n\nState the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active.\n\n### Contextual coexistence\n\nPreserve accounts differing by person, time, condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one.\n\n### Deliberate omissions and simplifications\n\nState what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong.\n\n## Construction review\n\nOpen this section only when construction begins.\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\n### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults\n\n### Questions reopened by construction\n\n### Target-representation and tooling losses\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\n### Net status and tool evidence\n```\n\n## Maintenance\n\n- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions.\n- Update the authoritative process spine when ordering or case behavior changes; reference activity and resource entries rather than duplicating their local details.\n- A restatement offered by the agent remains normalization even when accepted. Preserve exact evidence separately where origin matters.\n- For a genuine correction, update the active account and record what changed. For conflict or contextual coexistence, keep the alternatives and their unresolved or selecting conditions visible.\n- Remove irrelevant empty sections. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, or **Omitted** only when that state matters to later work.\n- If construction requires transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that boundary.\n- Record whether no construction was attempted, construction was blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md", + "lines": 154 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284075688 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 65, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:35.691Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JZNBN17SWBM6ZNW1DX1Y", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 66, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:35.691Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JZNBN17SWBM6ZNW1DX1Y", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net) in Petrinaut. According to my instructions, I should activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation. This is a process-modelling task, so I need to load those specialized instructions first.\n\nLet me activate that skill now.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'll help you develop a process model for your approval workflow. Let me first activate the specialized modelling guidance." + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01GQRK3SU3Kkm5wFpezLtStr", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01GQRK3SU3Kkm5wFpezLtStr", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, I've loaded the skill. Now according to the instructions, I need to:\n\n1. Orient first - establish purpose and context\n2. The skill instructions mention a \"required disclosure gate\" - if human knowledge is required that available evidence doesn't contain, I need to read the universal-elicitation.md and sdcpn-elicitation.md files before asking questions.\n\nSince the user has just made an initial request without providing details about their specific approval process, I will need to ask questions to elicit how their approval process works. This definitely requires human knowledge I don't have.\n\nLet me follow the required disclosure procedure and read the guidance documents.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I need to read the modelling guidance before we start eliciting your approval process details." + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_018uH9UBJotzLEtWRVykDvMx", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_019NQptTaRGzah17REYVzjMp", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_019hsn6RYAPQyKdWPJopLaej", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_018uH9UBJotzLEtWRVykDvMx", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_019NQptTaRGzah17REYVzjMp", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_019hsn6RYAPQyKdWPJopLaej", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Process-Model Workpiece and Recording Contract\n\nThe workpiece is the shared, recoverable operational account. Elicitation and revision maintain it; construction consumes it. The transcript remains evidence, not the primary model.\n\nFollow the person's thread during conversation and file material into the workpiece afterward. Its headings are recording homes, not question order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose, while keeping consequential omissions visible.\n\n## Recording distinctions\n\nUse these distinctions wherever they carry information; they are not mandatory labels on every sentence:\n\n- **Expert evidence** — What the person said, preserving consequential vocabulary, hedges, context, and source regime.\n- **Working account** — The current normalized operational description accepted for use.\n- **Agent inference** — An interpretation of evidence, visibly attributed to the agent.\n- **Assumed** — A value or structure proposed by the agent, with its reason, consequence, and route to checking.\n- **Unknown** — Asked, but the person does not know.\n- **Not yet asked** — Relevant and identified, but not yet addressed.\n- **Deferred** — Left for later, with why it matters and a named source or route to an answer.\n- **Declined** — The person chose not to answer or include it.\n- **Conflict** — Accounts cannot yet be used together; preserve both and what could distinguish them.\n- **Correction** — A current account that replaces an earlier one, retaining enough history to explain the change without leaving both active.\n- **Contextual coexistence** — Different accounts apply under different people, times, modes, directions, policies, or operating conditions.\n- **Omitted** — Deliberately outside the model, with why the purpose permits the omission.\n- **Target loss** — Supported operational meaning the SDCPN or current tools cannot faithfully carry.\n\nEvidence and precision are independent. “About three hours” may be supported but coarse; an exact agent-supplied value may be precise-looking but unsupported.\n\nKeep one authoritative home for each active claim. Do not accumulate competing summaries. When a later statement differs, establish whether it is a correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before updating the working account.\n\n## Workpiece template\n\n```markdown\n# Process-Model Workpiece\n\n## Purpose and posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\n\n### Who will use it and how\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n\n### Available time and assumption appetite\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; record its ordering in the process spine.\n\n### Case and process spine\n\nGive the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary: what admits the case, what flows, which activities occur and in what order, what changes the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the work and resources, and what outcome or handoff ends it.\n\n#### Primary case: \n\n##### Trigger or admission\n\n##### Ordered account and references\n\n##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes\n\n##### Objective dependencies\n\n#### Additional or contrasting case: \n\nAdd only when a different case exposes consequential structure the primary case does not.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\n### Validation evidence and data sources\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\nKeep evidence beside affected process material where practical. Use this section for evidence spanning several parts of the account or whose relationship needs explanation.\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\n### Normalized account\n\n### Agent inferences and proposed structure\n\n## Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nFor each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked.\n\n### Unknown to the person\n\n### Not yet asked\n\n### Declined\n\n### Deferred and deposits\n\nFor each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it.\n\n### Ambiguities and conflicts\n\nPreserve alternatives and the evidence for each. Do not choose or average without support.\n\n### Corrections\n\nState the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active.\n\n### Contextual coexistence\n\nPreserve accounts differing by person, time, condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one.\n\n### Deliberate omissions and simplifications\n\nState what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong.\n\n## Construction review\n\nOpen this section only when construction begins.\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\n### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults\n\n### Questions reopened by construction\n\n### Target-representation and tooling losses\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\n### Net status and tool evidence\n```\n\n## Maintenance\n\n- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions.\n- Update the authoritative process spine when ordering or case behavior changes; reference activity and resource entries rather than duplicating their local details.\n- A restatement offered by the agent remains normalization even when accepted. Preserve exact evidence separately where origin matters.\n- For a genuine correction, update the active account and record what changed. For conflict or contextual coexistence, keep the alternatives and their unresolved or selecting conditions visible.\n- Remove irrelevant empty sections. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, or **Omitted** only when that state matters to later work.\n- If construction requires transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that boundary.\n- Record whether no construction was attempted, construction was blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 67, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:35.692Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284075694 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JZNBN17SWBM6ZNW1DX1Y", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 68, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:36.547Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JZNBN17SWBM6ZNW1DX1Y", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 69, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:36.547Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "Good", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JZNBN17SWBM6ZNW1DX1Y", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 70, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:37.550Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ", I've now read the guidance. Now I need to orient before asking questions.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JZNBN17SWBM6ZNW1DX1Y", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 71, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:37.550Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " Let me establish:\n\n1. What the model must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JZNBN17SWBM6ZNW1DX1Y", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 72, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:37.550Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "\n2. Who will use it and how\n3. The boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n4. What time they have\n5. What assumptions", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JZNBN17SWBM6ZNW1DX1Y", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 73, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:37.550Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " they're willing to make\n\nThen I need to follow one concrete case, using their vocabulary,", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JZNBN17SWBM6ZNW1DX1Y", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 74, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:38.870Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " building from the operational account.\n\nThe person said \"our approval process\" so they have an operational approval", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JZNBN17SWBM6ZNW1DX1Y", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 75, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:38.870Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " process they want to model. I should start by understanding what this model is for - what question does it need", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JZNBN17SWBM6ZNW1DX1Y", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 76, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:38.870Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " to answer? Is it performance analysis? Bottleneck finding? Compliance checking? Cost reduction?\n\nLet me", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JZNBN17SWBM6ZNW1DX1Y", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 77, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:38.870Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " open with one focused question about purpose.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JZNBN17SWBM6ZNW1DX1Y", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 78, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:39.052Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "Good, I've now read the guidance. Now I need to orient before asking questions. Let me establish:\n\n1. What the model must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change\n2. Who will use it and how\n3. The boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n4. What time they have\n5. What assumptions they're willing to make\n\nThen I need to follow one concrete case, using their vocabulary, building from the operational account.\n\nThe person said \"our approval process\" so they have an operational approval process they want to model. I should start by understanding what this model is for - what question does it need to answer? Is it performance analysis? Bottleneck finding? Compliance checking? Cost reduction?\n\nLet me open with one focused question about purpose.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JZNBN17SWBM6ZNW1DX1Y", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 79, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:39.053Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "Good. Now I can", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JZNBN17SWBM6ZNW1DX1Y", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 80, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:40.029Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " help you model your approval process. Let me start by understanding what you need this model to help you decide or answer.\n\n**What question or decision would", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JZNBN17SWBM6ZNW1DX1Y", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 81, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:40.029Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " this model help you address?** For example, are you looking to understand bottlenecks, estimate how long", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JZNBN17SWBM6ZNW1DX1Y", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 82, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:40.029Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " approvals take, compare different approval strategies, check whether a policy is being followed, estimate resource needs, or something else?", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JZNBN17SWBM6ZNW1DX1Y", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 83, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:40.029Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JZNBN17SWBM6ZNW1DX1Y", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4342, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced82zzR6En191NYvEhvZ", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, I've now read the guidance. Now I need to orient before asking questions. Let me establish:\n\n1. What the model must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change\n2. Who will use it and how\n3. The boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n4. What time they have\n5. What assumptions they're willing to make\n\nThen I need to follow one concrete case, using their vocabulary, building from the operational account.\n\nThe person said \"our approval process\" so they have an operational approval process they want to model. I should start by understanding what this model is for - what question does it need to answer? Is it performance analysis? Bottleneck finding? Compliance checking? Cost reduction?\n\nLet me open with one focused question about purpose.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good. Now I can help you model your approval process. Let me start by understanding what you need this model to help you decide or answer.\n\n**What question or decision would this model help you address?** For example, are you looking to understand bottlenecks, estimate how long approvals take, compare different approval strategies, check whether a policy is being followed, estimate resource needs, or something else?" + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 14, + "output": 264, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 11992, + "totalTokens": 12270, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000014, + "output": 0.0013200000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.01499, + "total": 0.016323999999999998 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 84, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:40.033Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, I've now read the guidance. Now I need to orient before asking questions. Let me establish:\n\n1. What the model must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change\n2. Who will use it and how\n3. The boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n4. What time they have\n5. What assumptions they're willing to make\n\nThen I need to follow one concrete case, using their vocabulary, building from the operational account.\n\nThe person said \"our approval process\" so they have an operational approval process they want to model. I should start by understanding what this model is for - what question does it need to answer? Is it performance analysis? Bottleneck finding? Compliance checking? Cost reduction?\n\nLet me open with one focused question about purpose.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good. Now I can help you model your approval process. Let me start by understanding what you need this model to help you decide or answer.\n\n**What question or decision would this model help you address?** For example, are you looking to understand bottlenecks, estimate how long approvals take, compare different approval strategies, check whether a policy is being followed, estimate resource needs, or something else?" + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 14, + "output": 264, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 11992, + "totalTokens": 12270, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000014, + "output": 0.0013200000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.01499, + "total": 0.016323999999999998 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 174 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284075694, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced82zzR6En191NYvEhvZ", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JZNBN17SWBM6ZNW1DX1Y", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 85, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:40.033Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0JZNBN17SWBM6ZNW1DX1Y", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, I've now read the guidance. Now I need to orient before asking questions. Let me establish:\n\n1. What the model must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change\n2. Who will use it and how\n3. The boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n4. What time they have\n5. What assumptions they're willing to make\n\nThen I need to follow one concrete case, using their vocabulary, building from the operational account.\n\nThe person said \"our approval process\" so they have an operational approval process they want to model. I should start by understanding what this model is for - what question does it need to answer? Is it performance analysis? Bottleneck finding? Compliance checking? Cost reduction?\n\nLet me open with one focused question about purpose.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good. Now I can help you model your approval process. Let me start by understanding what you need this model to help you decide or answer.\n\n**What question or decision would this model help you address?** For example, are you looking to understand bottlenecks, estimate how long approvals take, compare different approval strategies, check whether a policy is being followed, estimate resource needs, or something else?" + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 14, + "output": 264, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 11992, + "totalTokens": 12270, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000014, + "output": 0.0013200000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.01499, + "total": 0.016323999999999998 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 174 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284075694, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced82zzR6En191NYvEhvZ", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 86, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:40.034Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net) in Petrinaut. According to my instructions, I should activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation. This is a process-modelling task, so I need to load those specialized instructions first.\n\nLet me activate that skill now.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'll help you develop a process model for your approval workflow. Let me first activate the specialized modelling guidance." + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01GQRK3SU3Kkm5wFpezLtStr", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2408, + "output": 179, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 2587, + "cost": { + "input": 0.002408, + "output": 0.0008950000000000001, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.003303 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 93 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284068770, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced82V7pF33qsxseVSzJZ", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01GQRK3SU3Kkm5wFpezLtStr", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284070965 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, I've loaded the skill. Now according to the instructions, I need to:\n\n1. Orient first - establish purpose and context\n2. The skill instructions mention a \"required disclosure gate\" - if human knowledge is required that available evidence doesn't contain, I need to read the universal-elicitation.md and sdcpn-elicitation.md files before asking questions.\n\nSince the user has just made an initial request without providing details about their specific approval process, I will need to ask questions to elicit how their approval process works. This definitely requires human knowledge I don't have.\n\nLet me follow the required disclosure procedure and read the guidance documents.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I need to read the modelling guidance before we start eliciting your approval process details." + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_018uH9UBJotzLEtWRVykDvMx", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_019NQptTaRGzah17REYVzjMp", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_019hsn6RYAPQyKdWPJopLaej", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3771, + "output": 415, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 4186, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0037709999999999996, + "output": 0.002075, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005846 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 145 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284070968, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced82ecZV43NEKiaLrRHh", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_018uH9UBJotzLEtWRVykDvMx", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284075688 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_019NQptTaRGzah17REYVzjMp", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284075688 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_019hsn6RYAPQyKdWPJopLaej", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Process-Model Workpiece and Recording Contract\n\nThe workpiece is the shared, recoverable operational account. Elicitation and revision maintain it; construction consumes it. The transcript remains evidence, not the primary model.\n\nFollow the person's thread during conversation and file material into the workpiece afterward. Its headings are recording homes, not question order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose, while keeping consequential omissions visible.\n\n## Recording distinctions\n\nUse these distinctions wherever they carry information; they are not mandatory labels on every sentence:\n\n- **Expert evidence** — What the person said, preserving consequential vocabulary, hedges, context, and source regime.\n- **Working account** — The current normalized operational description accepted for use.\n- **Agent inference** — An interpretation of evidence, visibly attributed to the agent.\n- **Assumed** — A value or structure proposed by the agent, with its reason, consequence, and route to checking.\n- **Unknown** — Asked, but the person does not know.\n- **Not yet asked** — Relevant and identified, but not yet addressed.\n- **Deferred** — Left for later, with why it matters and a named source or route to an answer.\n- **Declined** — The person chose not to answer or include it.\n- **Conflict** — Accounts cannot yet be used together; preserve both and what could distinguish them.\n- **Correction** — A current account that replaces an earlier one, retaining enough history to explain the change without leaving both active.\n- **Contextual coexistence** — Different accounts apply under different people, times, modes, directions, policies, or operating conditions.\n- **Omitted** — Deliberately outside the model, with why the purpose permits the omission.\n- **Target loss** — Supported operational meaning the SDCPN or current tools cannot faithfully carry.\n\nEvidence and precision are independent. “About three hours” may be supported but coarse; an exact agent-supplied value may be precise-looking but unsupported.\n\nKeep one authoritative home for each active claim. Do not accumulate competing summaries. When a later statement differs, establish whether it is a correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before updating the working account.\n\n## Workpiece template\n\n```markdown\n# Process-Model Workpiece\n\n## Purpose and posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\n\n### Who will use it and how\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n\n### Available time and assumption appetite\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; record its ordering in the process spine.\n\n### Case and process spine\n\nGive the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary: what admits the case, what flows, which activities occur and in what order, what changes the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the work and resources, and what outcome or handoff ends it.\n\n#### Primary case: \n\n##### Trigger or admission\n\n##### Ordered account and references\n\n##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes\n\n##### Objective dependencies\n\n#### Additional or contrasting case: \n\nAdd only when a different case exposes consequential structure the primary case does not.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\n### Validation evidence and data sources\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\nKeep evidence beside affected process material where practical. Use this section for evidence spanning several parts of the account or whose relationship needs explanation.\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\n### Normalized account\n\n### Agent inferences and proposed structure\n\n## Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nFor each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked.\n\n### Unknown to the person\n\n### Not yet asked\n\n### Declined\n\n### Deferred and deposits\n\nFor each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it.\n\n### Ambiguities and conflicts\n\nPreserve alternatives and the evidence for each. Do not choose or average without support.\n\n### Corrections\n\nState the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active.\n\n### Contextual coexistence\n\nPreserve accounts differing by person, time, condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one.\n\n### Deliberate omissions and simplifications\n\nState what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong.\n\n## Construction review\n\nOpen this section only when construction begins.\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\n### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults\n\n### Questions reopened by construction\n\n### Target-representation and tooling losses\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\n### Net status and tool evidence\n```\n\n## Maintenance\n\n- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions.\n- Update the authoritative process spine when ordering or case behavior changes; reference activity and resource entries rather than duplicating their local details.\n- A restatement offered by the agent remains normalization even when accepted. Preserve exact evidence separately where origin matters.\n- For a genuine correction, update the active account and record what changed. For conflict or contextual coexistence, keep the alternatives and their unresolved or selecting conditions visible.\n- Remove irrelevant empty sections. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, or **Omitted** only when that state matters to later work.\n- If construction requires transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that boundary.\n- Record whether no construction was attempted, construction was blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md", + "lines": 154 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284075688 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, I've now read the guidance. Now I need to orient before asking questions. Let me establish:\n\n1. What the model must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change\n2. Who will use it and how\n3. The boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n4. What time they have\n5. What assumptions they're willing to make\n\nThen I need to follow one concrete case, using their vocabulary, building from the operational account.\n\nThe person said \"our approval process\" so they have an operational approval process they want to model. I should start by understanding what this model is for - what question does it need to answer? Is it performance analysis? Bottleneck finding? Compliance checking? Cost reduction?\n\nLet me open with one focused question about purpose.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good. Now I can help you model your approval process. Let me start by understanding what you need this model to help you decide or answer.\n\n**What question or decision would this model help you address?** For example, are you looking to understand bottlenecks, estimate how long approvals take, compare different approval strategies, check whether a policy is being followed, estimate resource needs, or something else?" + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 14, + "output": 264, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 11992, + "totalTokens": 12270, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000014, + "output": 0.0013200000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.01499, + "total": 0.016323999999999998 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 174 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284075694, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced82zzR6En191NYvEhvZ", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 87, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:40.034Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 11281, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 88, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:40.035Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0JRVVZHPJ13AXSVFSYXVZ", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0JRWJES0E68745QGXE4KZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 89, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:40.035Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0JRVS1VXM27SR1PF1H71X", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "b1ba7068149612eb0c1e31eb3a2dd44423473720a0f3f7eb7eb0641b6832c335", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 90, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:40.035Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "d2d42344c40ddeb2471eeeba437032079bd2c7083afdbc2f9de5e823f841d5b8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "ebec2ac5faab6cbbbe26eeeebc2d7ac0ba7dc637fd43ea9b5917f8e0277f5515", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "c7cb5b2222b0d1b5aff861c4056f41ba8825aca284ec774d8e4f0fbf12807314", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "321f8405c12374315d61caf466001d6b4b5cf68b04325df77a7948daaa680de1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/scenarios.json": "1844df940b8de9d10d28e9537f966920aba581b36956a9ac26a3767824ca96cb", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/protocol.md": "ef1443bb02c6c26d4ded6edf9e023579bc32cdc394f90490edfb34eaf32b8ed2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md": "8cd2749c8292f01045ab4282fc7248c07046cecaf14a586a9ef286e2876cf8bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md": "82b035268c07cc8ee4736b5ffdd392c8f153793d2ca6b9ed57271c9b6146de10", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md": "8826b85d32d6c24fbc8f678ec394600676ec61c4a0b83d0a9cfa16be87fc5d76", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "1a2417cc5f9649d459c5efbc87cd3242db99a9717622a6d86073c72835818865" + }, + "promptSelection": { + "candidateCorePromptIncluded": true, + "v3SdcpnAppendIncluded": true, + "legacyCorePromptIncluded": false, + "legacyRoleMarkerIncluded": false, + "initialSystemPromptSha256": "ad472c3919f1857f1f5f02f83bf0adb83c4795808e44f2b58813b158585b61f7" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "candidateCorePrompt": "6a458c0bbbc9dee5b4454a54b032818227ab681ba9f7beaa60d4fe9628f6eb41", + "v3SdcpnAppend": "73cac46487d33051a90cc487ea7abfc11fec4b049af11a108396ec08d44569fb", + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S1-packaged-r2.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S1-packaged-r2.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..59bb580151a --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S1-packaged-r2.json @@ -0,0 +1,3475 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v3-packaged-s1-83c70811", + "phase": "paid", + "instrumentVersion": "v3", + "candidate": "packaged", + "scenarioId": "S1", + "scenario": { + "title": "Underspecified interactive request", + "prompt": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "stopAfter": "The first consequential question.", + "expected": "Ask one high-yield question in operational vocabulary after loading universal and SDCPN elicitation judgment." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "Good, I'm ready to help you model your approval process. Before we get into the details, let me understand what you need this model to do for you.\n\n**What's the main question or decision you want this model to help you answer?** For instance, are you trying to:\n- understand how long approvals typically take?\n- find where delays or bottlenecks happen?\n- test a proposed change to the process?\n- compare two different approval strategies?\n- something else?", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LzWqDYDyEwtVaFHvwVvY2h", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "toolu_014e2oDhwB8Aj6Uh4Tah17SG", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "toolu_014sGrS4MJsjH2UqRG5KdvcU", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [ + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "sha256": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "sha256": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf" + } + ], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 1917, + "inputTokens": 2408, + "outputTokens": 154, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 2562, + "cost": 0.0031780000000000003 + }, + { + "durationMs": 2800, + "inputTokens": 3746, + "outputTokens": 216, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 3962, + "cost": 0.0048259999999999996 + }, + { + "durationMs": 2465, + "inputTokens": 13, + "outputTokens": 123, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 6909, + "totalTokens": 7045, + "cost": 0.00926425 + }, + { + "durationMs": 4164, + "inputTokens": 13, + "outputTokens": 255, + "cacheReadTokens": 6909, + "cacheWriteTokens": 3523, + "totalTokens": 10700, + "cost": 0.00638265 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 11346, + "inputTokens": 6180, + "outputTokens": 748, + "cacheReadTokens": 6909, + "cacheWriteTokens": 10432, + "totalTokens": 24269, + "cost": 0.0236509 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nHelp me model our approval process as an SDCPN.\n\n## Assistant\nGood, I'm ready to help you model your approval process. Before we get into the details, let me understand what you need this model to do for you.\n\n**What's the main question or decision you want this model to help you answer?** For instance, are you trying to:\n- understand how long approvals typically take?\n- find where delays or bottlenecks happen?\n- test a proposed change to the process?\n- compare two different approval strategies?\n- something else?\n- tool activate_skill (toolu_01LzWqDYDyEwtVaFHvwVvY2h): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\\n\\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\\n\\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\\n\\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\\n\\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (toolu_014e2oDhwB8Aj6Uh4Tah17SG): \"# Universal Elicitation Reference\\n\\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\\n\\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Work from purpose\\n\\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\\n\\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\\n\\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\\n\\n### Follow the person's account\\n\\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\\n\\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\\n\\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\\n\\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\\n\\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\\n\\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\\n\\n### Treat divergence as information\\n\\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\\n\\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\\n\\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\\n\\n### Stop honestly\\n\\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\\n\\n### Vague or compressed language\\n\\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\\n\\n### Normative language\\n\\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\\n\\n### Tension within or between accounts\\n\\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\\n\\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\\n\\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\\n\\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\\n\\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\\n\\n### Diminishing yield\\n\\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\\n\\n### Assent without independent wording\\n\\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\\n\\n### Silence and absence\\n\\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\\n\\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\\n\\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\\n\\n### Slice a concrete case\\n\\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\\n\\n### Sweep one property\\n\\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\\n\\n### Ask for the last occurrence\\n\\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\\n\\n### Ask for the basis\\n\\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\\n\\n### Ground a term or artifact\\n\\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\\n\\n### Clarify until observable\\n\\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\\n\\n### Use contrastive cases\\n\\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\\n\\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\\n\\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\\n\\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\\n\\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\\n\\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\\n\\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\\n\\n### Restate for correction\\n\\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\\n\\n### Propose structure for correction\\n\\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\\n\\n### Deposit and defer\\n\\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\\n\\n### Press without trapping\\n\\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\\n\\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\\n\\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\\n\\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\\n\\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\\n\\n### Trade concrete outcomes\\n\\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\\n\\n### Close with one correction opportunity\\n\\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\\n\\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\\n\\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\\n\\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\\n\\n### Before asking\\n\\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\\n\\n### Before recording\\n\\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\\n\\n### Before closing\\n\\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (toolu_014sGrS4MJsjH2UqRG5KdvcU): \"# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\\n\\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\\n\\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\\n\\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\\n\\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\\n\\n### Keep target structure backstage\\n\\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\\n\\n### Preserve operational context\\n\\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\\n\\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\\n\\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\\n\\n### Language and account signals\\n\\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\\n\\n### Operational situation patterns\\n\\n#### Timed work\\n\\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\\n\\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\\n\\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\\n\\n#### Contended resource\\n\\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\\n\\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\\n\\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\\n\\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\\n\\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\\n\\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\\n\\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\\n\\n#### Mode change\\n\\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\\n\\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\\n\\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\\n\\n#### Spatial transfer\\n\\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\\n\\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\\n\\n#### Policy under pressure\\n\\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\\n\\n#### Hidden waiting\\n\\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\\n\\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\\n\\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\\n\\n### Link the slice to the objective\\n\\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\\n\\n### Expose the process spine\\n\\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\\n\\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\\n\\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\\n\\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\\n\\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\\n\\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\\n\\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\\n\\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\\n\\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\\n\\n### Close a resource account\\n\\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\\n\\n### Close a mode change in both directions\\n\\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\\n\\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\\n\\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\\n\\n### Ask what is conserved\\n\\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\\n\\n### Establish retry scope\\n\\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\\n\\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\\n\\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\\n\\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\\n\\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\\n\\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\\n\\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\\n\\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\\n\\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\\n\\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\\n\\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\\n\\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\\n\\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\\n\\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\\n\\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\\n\\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\\n\\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\\n\\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\\n\\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\\n\\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\\n\\n### Purpose and process\\n\\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\\n\\n### Operational semantics\\n\\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\\n\\n### Quantities and context\\n\\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000040", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFGMEtCNjhaM1I1MEtZMENWODdGNjJZ", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1F0KBWMP5GD05TA5S4F3W9Y", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KB773RJ6G4NSJATG6278", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net) in Petrinaut. This is directly matched by the `sdcpn-modelling` skill described in my instructions. I should activate that skill before proceeding with substantive elicitation.\n\nLet me activate the skill first, then begin the elicitation process.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LzWqDYDyEwtVaFHvwVvY2h", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 3 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good, the skill has been activated. Now I need to follow the procedure outlined in the skill instructions. According to the skill:\n\n1. I need to orient first - establish purpose, context, boundary, horizon, accuracy need\n2. Before any consequential question, I need to complete the \"required universal-disclosure action\" which is to read `universal-elicitation.md`\n3. Then I should read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking the first focused question\n\nLet me read the required disclosure material first.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_014e2oDhwB8Aj6Uh4Tah17SG", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n", + "durationMs": 1 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good. Now I should read the SDCPN-specific elicitation guidance.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_014sGrS4MJsjH2UqRG5KdvcU", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n", + "durationMs": 1 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Excellent. Now I have both the universal elicitation guidance and the SDCPN-specific guidance. Now I should orient by establishing the purpose, context, and key parameters before diving into the detailed elicitation. \n\nLet me follow the Directives and begin with an orientation question that focuses on purpose and context. I should:\n1. Establish what the approval process model needs to help them decide/answer/explain/change\n2. Get enough context to understand the scope\n3. Work from a concrete case\n4. Use their vocabulary, not Petri net terms\n\nI'll start with a focused question about their purpose for the model.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good, I'm ready to help you model your approval process. Before we get into the details, let me understand what you need this model to do for you.\n\n**What's the main question or decision you want this model to help you answer?** For instance, are you trying to:\n- understand how long approvals typically take?\n- find where delays or bottlenecks happen?\n- test a proposed change to the process?\n- compare two different approval strategies?\n- something else?", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1F0KB69K78H0C0BTGRAPR8N" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:47.499Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:47.501Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:47.521Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:47.527Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KB773RJ6G4NSJATG6278", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:47.527Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KB773RJ6G4NSJATG6278", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:47.527Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284087538 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KB773RJ6G4NSJATG6278", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:48.213Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KB773RJ6G4NSJATG6278", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:48.215Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "The user wants to", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KB773RJ6G4NSJATG6278", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:49.217Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net) in Petrinaut. This is directly matched", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KB773RJ6G4NSJATG6278", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:49.217Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " by the `sdcpn-modelling` skill described in my instructions. I should activate that skill before proceeding with substantive elicitation", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KB773RJ6G4NSJATG6278", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:49.218Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ".\n\nLet me activate the skill first, then begin the elicitation process.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KB773RJ6G4NSJATG6278", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:49.218Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net) in Petrinaut. This is directly matched by the `sdcpn-modelling` skill described in my instructions. I should activate that skill before proceeding with substantive elicitation.\n\nLet me activate the skill first, then begin the elicitation process.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KB773RJ6G4NSJATG6278", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:49.431Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LzWqDYDyEwtVaFHvwVvY2h", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KB773RJ6G4NSJATG6278", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:49.432Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LzWqDYDyEwtVaFHvwVvY2h", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\": \"sdcpn-modelling", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KB773RJ6G4NSJATG6278", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:49.434Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LzWqDYDyEwtVaFHvwVvY2h", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KB773RJ6G4NSJATG6278", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:49.434Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KB773RJ6G4NSJATG6278", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 1917, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced83sP3nC9f6GyZJ2GdZ", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net) in Petrinaut. This is directly matched by the `sdcpn-modelling` skill described in my instructions. I should activate that skill before proceeding with substantive elicitation.\n\nLet me activate the skill first, then begin the elicitation process.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01LzWqDYDyEwtVaFHvwVvY2h", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2408, + "output": 154, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 2562, + "cost": { + "input": 0.002408, + "output": 0.0007700000000000001, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.0031780000000000003 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:49.444Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net) in Petrinaut. This is directly matched by the `sdcpn-modelling` skill described in my instructions. I should activate that skill before proceeding with substantive elicitation.\n\nLet me activate the skill first, then begin the elicitation process.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01LzWqDYDyEwtVaFHvwVvY2h", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2408, + "output": 154, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 2562, + "cost": { + "input": 0.002408, + "output": 0.0007700000000000001, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.0031780000000000003 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 92 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284087538, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced83sP3nC9f6GyZJ2GdZ", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KB773RJ6G4NSJATG6278", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:49.444Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LzWqDYDyEwtVaFHvwVvY2h", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KB773RJ6G4NSJATG6278", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:49.446Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LzWqDYDyEwtVaFHvwVvY2h", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284089449 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KB773RJ6G4NSJATG6278", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:49.449Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LzWqDYDyEwtVaFHvwVvY2h", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284089449 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KB773RJ6G4NSJATG6278", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:49.449Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LzWqDYDyEwtVaFHvwVvY2h", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 3, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KB773RJ6G4NSJATG6278", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:49.449Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KB773RJ6G4NSJATG6278", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net) in Petrinaut. This is directly matched by the `sdcpn-modelling` skill described in my instructions. I should activate that skill before proceeding with substantive elicitation.\n\nLet me activate the skill first, then begin the elicitation process.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01LzWqDYDyEwtVaFHvwVvY2h", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2408, + "output": 154, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 2562, + "cost": { + "input": 0.002408, + "output": 0.0007700000000000001, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.0031780000000000003 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 92 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284087538, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced83sP3nC9f6GyZJ2GdZ", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LzWqDYDyEwtVaFHvwVvY2h", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284089449 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:49.450Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KD3A8KHG8BZSB3NS0EGZ", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:49.450Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KD3A8KHG8BZSB3NS0EGZ", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net) in Petrinaut. This is directly matched by the `sdcpn-modelling` skill described in my instructions. I should activate that skill before proceeding with substantive elicitation.\n\nLet me activate the skill first, then begin the elicitation process.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01LzWqDYDyEwtVaFHvwVvY2h", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LzWqDYDyEwtVaFHvwVvY2h", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:49.450Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284089451 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KD3A8KHG8BZSB3NS0EGZ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:50.135Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KD3A8KHG8BZSB3NS0EGZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:50.136Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "Good", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KD3A8KHG8BZSB3NS0EGZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:51.138Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ", the skill has been activated. Now I need to follow the procedure outlined in the skill instructions. According to the skill:\n\n1. I", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KD3A8KHG8BZSB3NS0EGZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:51.138Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " need to orient first - establish purpose, context, boundary, horizon, accuracy need\n2. Before any consequential question, I need to", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KD3A8KHG8BZSB3NS0EGZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:51.138Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " complete the \"required universal-disclosure action\" which is to read `universal-elicitation.md`\n3. Then I should", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KD3A8KHG8BZSB3NS0EGZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:51.138Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking the first focused question\n\nLet me read the required", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KD3A8KHG8BZSB3NS0EGZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:51.804Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " disclosure material first.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KD3A8KHG8BZSB3NS0EGZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:51.804Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "Good, the skill has been activated. Now I need to follow the procedure outlined in the skill instructions. According to the skill:\n\n1. I need to orient first - establish purpose, context, boundary, horizon, accuracy need\n2. Before any consequential question, I need to complete the \"required universal-disclosure action\" which is to read `universal-elicitation.md`\n3. Then I should read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking the first focused question\n\nLet me read the required disclosure material first.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KD3A8KHG8BZSB3NS0EGZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:51.804Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_014e2oDhwB8Aj6Uh4Tah17SG", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KD3A8KHG8BZSB3NS0EGZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:51.804Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_014e2oDhwB8Aj6Uh4Tah17SG", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\": \"/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KD3A8KHG8BZSB3NS0EGZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:52.121Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_014e2oDhwB8Aj6Uh4Tah17SG", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KD3A8KHG8BZSB3NS0EGZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:52.223Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KD3A8KHG8BZSB3NS0EGZ", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 2800, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced841PWAi3iaWyb7oMYT", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill has been activated. Now I need to follow the procedure outlined in the skill instructions. According to the skill:\n\n1. I need to orient first - establish purpose, context, boundary, horizon, accuracy need\n2. Before any consequential question, I need to complete the \"required universal-disclosure action\" which is to read `universal-elicitation.md`\n3. Then I should read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking the first focused question\n\nLet me read the required disclosure material first.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_014e2oDhwB8Aj6Uh4Tah17SG", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3746, + "output": 216, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3962, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0037459999999999998, + "output": 0.00108, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.0048259999999999996 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:52.250Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill has been activated. Now I need to follow the procedure outlined in the skill instructions. According to the skill:\n\n1. I need to orient first - establish purpose, context, boundary, horizon, accuracy need\n2. Before any consequential question, I need to complete the \"required universal-disclosure action\" which is to read `universal-elicitation.md`\n3. Then I should read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking the first focused question\n\nLet me read the required disclosure material first.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_014e2oDhwB8Aj6Uh4Tah17SG", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3746, + "output": 216, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3962, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0037459999999999998, + "output": 0.00108, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.0048259999999999996 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 120 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284089451, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced841PWAi3iaWyb7oMYT", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KD3A8KHG8BZSB3NS0EGZ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:52.251Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_014e2oDhwB8Aj6Uh4Tah17SG", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KD3A8KHG8BZSB3NS0EGZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:52.251Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_014e2oDhwB8Aj6Uh4Tah17SG", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284092253 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KD3A8KHG8BZSB3NS0EGZ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:52.253Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_014e2oDhwB8Aj6Uh4Tah17SG", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284092253 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KD3A8KHG8BZSB3NS0EGZ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:52.253Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_014e2oDhwB8Aj6Uh4Tah17SG", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + } + }, + "durationMs": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KD3A8KHG8BZSB3NS0EGZ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:52.254Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KD3A8KHG8BZSB3NS0EGZ", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill has been activated. Now I need to follow the procedure outlined in the skill instructions. According to the skill:\n\n1. I need to orient first - establish purpose, context, boundary, horizon, accuracy need\n2. Before any consequential question, I need to complete the \"required universal-disclosure action\" which is to read `universal-elicitation.md`\n3. Then I should read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking the first focused question\n\nLet me read the required disclosure material first.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_014e2oDhwB8Aj6Uh4Tah17SG", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3746, + "output": 216, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3962, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0037459999999999998, + "output": 0.00108, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.0048259999999999996 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 120 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284089451, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced841PWAi3iaWyb7oMYT", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_014e2oDhwB8Aj6Uh4Tah17SG", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284092253 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:52.254Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KFTY27DGXKQQM9QMH0X4", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:52.254Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KFTY27DGXKQQM9QMH0X4", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net) in Petrinaut. This is directly matched by the `sdcpn-modelling` skill described in my instructions. I should activate that skill before proceeding with substantive elicitation.\n\nLet me activate the skill first, then begin the elicitation process.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01LzWqDYDyEwtVaFHvwVvY2h", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LzWqDYDyEwtVaFHvwVvY2h", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill has been activated. Now I need to follow the procedure outlined in the skill instructions. According to the skill:\n\n1. I need to orient first - establish purpose, context, boundary, horizon, accuracy need\n2. Before any consequential question, I need to complete the \"required universal-disclosure action\" which is to read `universal-elicitation.md`\n3. Then I should read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking the first focused question\n\nLet me read the required disclosure material first.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_014e2oDhwB8Aj6Uh4Tah17SG", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_014e2oDhwB8Aj6Uh4Tah17SG", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:52.254Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284092256 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KFTY27DGXKQQM9QMH0X4", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:53.163Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KFTY27DGXKQQM9QMH0X4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:53.164Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "Good", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KFTY27DGXKQQM9QMH0X4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:53.764Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ". Now I should read the SDCPN-specific elicitation guidance", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KFTY27DGXKQQM9QMH0X4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:53.764Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ".", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KFTY27DGXKQQM9QMH0X4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:53.764Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "Good. Now I should read the SDCPN-specific elicitation guidance.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KFTY27DGXKQQM9QMH0X4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:53.764Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_014sGrS4MJsjH2UqRG5KdvcU", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KFTY27DGXKQQM9QMH0X4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:53.765Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_014sGrS4MJsjH2UqRG5KdvcU", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\": \"/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KFTY27DGXKQQM9QMH0X4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:54.084Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_014sGrS4MJsjH2UqRG5KdvcU", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KFTY27DGXKQQM9QMH0X4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:54.403Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_014sGrS4MJsjH2UqRG5KdvcU", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KFTY27DGXKQQM9QMH0X4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:54.709Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_014sGrS4MJsjH2UqRG5KdvcU", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KFTY27DGXKQQM9QMH0X4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:54.709Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KFTY27DGXKQQM9QMH0X4", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 2465, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced84DUXXa3ZnBwtKyvVX", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good. Now I should read the SDCPN-specific elicitation guidance.", + "thinkingSignature": "Er0CCpoBCBEYAipAYS64WSMpvS498rV8COzSaV21qpp+2Hblx/iBTWJi4Op0a8xFbJUQJy2S8qPO04tcan7IBd4FVKDHvI3o7ars0zIZY2xhdWRlLWhhaWt1LTQtNS0yMDI1MTAwMTgAQgh0aGlua2luZ1okMWNiODRmYzQtNDdhYS00ZTFmLWE2NjUtOTQwYWI5ZjgxZjg4qAG9mdzUBhIM2b2EroXvbn1WTQbwGgwjW3HBLbPoH/YRmkAiMLsHrLi2j2sZ3JjTJ1SR8VMVObg8fSmrPyjIyxlZpclIjkGK2v/HZVnl+twZlYbTASpQ6P7+HpP90Z5Q3OqTUZzr9facDeDoCng3T+NLRxjfDLTnOievajrClxedCGpiDsT6EypqTBn1ipOuY7R1ozkS2w4+/4kXaEWliVWL9P6FSW0YAQ==" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_014sGrS4MJsjH2UqRG5KdvcU", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 13, + "output": 123, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 6909, + "totalTokens": 7045, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000013, + "output": 0.0006150000000000001, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.00863625, + "total": 0.00926425 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:54.719Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good. Now I should read the SDCPN-specific elicitation guidance.", + "thinkingSignature": "Er0CCpoBCBEYAipAYS64WSMpvS498rV8COzSaV21qpp+2Hblx/iBTWJi4Op0a8xFbJUQJy2S8qPO04tcan7IBd4FVKDHvI3o7ars0zIZY2xhdWRlLWhhaWt1LTQtNS0yMDI1MTAwMTgAQgh0aGlua2luZ1okMWNiODRmYzQtNDdhYS00ZTFmLWE2NjUtOTQwYWI5ZjgxZjg4qAG9mdzUBhIM2b2EroXvbn1WTQbwGgwjW3HBLbPoH/YRmkAiMLsHrLi2j2sZ3JjTJ1SR8VMVObg8fSmrPyjIyxlZpclIjkGK2v/HZVnl+twZlYbTASpQ6P7+HpP90Z5Q3OqTUZzr9facDeDoCng3T+NLRxjfDLTnOievajrClxedCGpiDsT6EypqTBn1ipOuY7R1ozkS2w4+/4kXaEWliVWL9P6FSW0YAQ==" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_014sGrS4MJsjH2UqRG5KdvcU", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 13, + "output": 123, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 6909, + "totalTokens": 7045, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000013, + "output": 0.0006150000000000001, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.00863625, + "total": 0.00926425 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 24 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284092256, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced84DUXXa3ZnBwtKyvVX", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KFTY27DGXKQQM9QMH0X4", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 57, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:54.719Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_014sGrS4MJsjH2UqRG5KdvcU", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KFTY27DGXKQQM9QMH0X4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 58, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:54.719Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_014sGrS4MJsjH2UqRG5KdvcU", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284094721 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KFTY27DGXKQQM9QMH0X4", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 59, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:54.721Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_014sGrS4MJsjH2UqRG5KdvcU", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284094721 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KFTY27DGXKQQM9QMH0X4", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 60, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:54.722Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_014sGrS4MJsjH2UqRG5KdvcU", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + } + }, + "durationMs": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KFTY27DGXKQQM9QMH0X4", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 61, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:54.723Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KFTY27DGXKQQM9QMH0X4", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good. Now I should read the SDCPN-specific elicitation guidance.", + "thinkingSignature": "Er0CCpoBCBEYAipAYS64WSMpvS498rV8COzSaV21qpp+2Hblx/iBTWJi4Op0a8xFbJUQJy2S8qPO04tcan7IBd4FVKDHvI3o7ars0zIZY2xhdWRlLWhhaWt1LTQtNS0yMDI1MTAwMTgAQgh0aGlua2luZ1okMWNiODRmYzQtNDdhYS00ZTFmLWE2NjUtOTQwYWI5ZjgxZjg4qAG9mdzUBhIM2b2EroXvbn1WTQbwGgwjW3HBLbPoH/YRmkAiMLsHrLi2j2sZ3JjTJ1SR8VMVObg8fSmrPyjIyxlZpclIjkGK2v/HZVnl+twZlYbTASpQ6P7+HpP90Z5Q3OqTUZzr9facDeDoCng3T+NLRxjfDLTnOievajrClxedCGpiDsT6EypqTBn1ipOuY7R1ozkS2w4+/4kXaEWliVWL9P6FSW0YAQ==" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_014sGrS4MJsjH2UqRG5KdvcU", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 13, + "output": 123, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 6909, + "totalTokens": 7045, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000013, + "output": 0.0006150000000000001, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.00863625, + "total": 0.00926425 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 24 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284092256, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced84DUXXa3ZnBwtKyvVX", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_014sGrS4MJsjH2UqRG5KdvcU", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284094721 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 62, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:54.723Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KJ83PEMQVAZ9GJM94JMB", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 63, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:54.724Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KJ83PEMQVAZ9GJM94JMB", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net) in Petrinaut. This is directly matched by the `sdcpn-modelling` skill described in my instructions. I should activate that skill before proceeding with substantive elicitation.\n\nLet me activate the skill first, then begin the elicitation process.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01LzWqDYDyEwtVaFHvwVvY2h", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LzWqDYDyEwtVaFHvwVvY2h", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill has been activated. Now I need to follow the procedure outlined in the skill instructions. According to the skill:\n\n1. I need to orient first - establish purpose, context, boundary, horizon, accuracy need\n2. Before any consequential question, I need to complete the \"required universal-disclosure action\" which is to read `universal-elicitation.md`\n3. Then I should read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking the first focused question\n\nLet me read the required disclosure material first.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_014e2oDhwB8Aj6Uh4Tah17SG", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_014e2oDhwB8Aj6Uh4Tah17SG", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good. Now I should read the SDCPN-specific elicitation guidance.", + "thinkingSignature": "Er0CCpoBCBEYAipAYS64WSMpvS498rV8COzSaV21qpp+2Hblx/iBTWJi4Op0a8xFbJUQJy2S8qPO04tcan7IBd4FVKDHvI3o7ars0zIZY2xhdWRlLWhhaWt1LTQtNS0yMDI1MTAwMTgAQgh0aGlua2luZ1okMWNiODRmYzQtNDdhYS00ZTFmLWE2NjUtOTQwYWI5ZjgxZjg4qAG9mdzUBhIM2b2EroXvbn1WTQbwGgwjW3HBLbPoH/YRmkAiMLsHrLi2j2sZ3JjTJ1SR8VMVObg8fSmrPyjIyxlZpclIjkGK2v/HZVnl+twZlYbTASpQ6P7+HpP90Z5Q3OqTUZzr9facDeDoCng3T+NLRxjfDLTnOievajrClxedCGpiDsT6EypqTBn1ipOuY7R1ozkS2w4+/4kXaEWliVWL9P6FSW0YAQ==" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_014sGrS4MJsjH2UqRG5KdvcU", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_014sGrS4MJsjH2UqRG5KdvcU", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 64, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:54.724Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284094725 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KJ83PEMQVAZ9GJM94JMB", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 65, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:55.507Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KJ83PEMQVAZ9GJM94JMB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 66, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:55.508Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "Excellent.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KJ83PEMQVAZ9GJM94JMB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 67, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:56.510Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " Now I have both the universal elicitation guidance and the SDCPN-specific guidance. Now I should", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KJ83PEMQVAZ9GJM94JMB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 68, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:56.510Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " orient by establishing the purpose, context, and key parameters before diving into the detailed elicitation. \n\nLet me", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KJ83PEMQVAZ9GJM94JMB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 69, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:56.510Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " follow the Directives and begin with an orientation question that focuses on purpose and context. I should", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KJ83PEMQVAZ9GJM94JMB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 70, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:56.510Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ":\n1. Establish what the approval process model needs to help them decide/answer", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KJ83PEMQVAZ9GJM94JMB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 71, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:57.724Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "/explain/change\n2. Get enough context to understand the scope\n3. Work from a concrete", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KJ83PEMQVAZ9GJM94JMB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 72, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:57.724Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " case\n4. Use their vocabulary, not Petri net terms\n\nI'll start with a focused question about their purpose for", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KJ83PEMQVAZ9GJM94JMB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 73, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:57.724Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " the model.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KJ83PEMQVAZ9GJM94JMB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 74, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:57.758Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "Excellent. Now I have both the universal elicitation guidance and the SDCPN-specific guidance. Now I should orient by establishing the purpose, context, and key parameters before diving into the detailed elicitation. \n\nLet me follow the Directives and begin with an orientation question that focuses on purpose and context. I should:\n1. Establish what the approval process model needs to help them decide/answer/explain/change\n2. Get enough context to understand the scope\n3. Work from a concrete case\n4. Use their vocabulary, not Petri net terms\n\nI'll start with a focused question about their purpose for the model.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KJ83PEMQVAZ9GJM94JMB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 75, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:57.758Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "Good, I'm ready to help you model your approval process. Before we get into", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KJ83PEMQVAZ9GJM94JMB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 76, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:58.761Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " the details, let me understand what you need this model to do for you.\n\n**What's the main", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KJ83PEMQVAZ9GJM94JMB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 77, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:58.761Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " question or decision you want this model to help you answer?** For instance, are you trying to", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KJ83PEMQVAZ9GJM94JMB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 78, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:58.761Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": ":\n- understand how long approvals typically take?\n- find where delays or bottlenecks happen?\n- test a proposed change", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KJ83PEMQVAZ9GJM94JMB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 79, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:58.761Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " to the process?\n- compare two different approval strategies?\n- something else?", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KJ83PEMQVAZ9GJM94JMB", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 80, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:58.846Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KJ83PEMQVAZ9GJM94JMB", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4164, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced84Q2XqUfvUDWEbVtgB", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Excellent. Now I have both the universal elicitation guidance and the SDCPN-specific guidance. Now I should orient by establishing the purpose, context, and key parameters before diving into the detailed elicitation. \n\nLet me follow the Directives and begin with an orientation question that focuses on purpose and context. I should:\n1. Establish what the approval process model needs to help them decide/answer/explain/change\n2. Get enough context to understand the scope\n3. Work from a concrete case\n4. Use their vocabulary, not Petri net terms\n\nI'll start with a focused question about their purpose for the model.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good, I'm ready to help you model your approval process. Before we get into the details, let me understand what you need this model to do for you.\n\n**What's the main question or decision you want this model to help you answer?** For instance, are you trying to:\n- understand how long approvals typically take?\n- find where delays or bottlenecks happen?\n- test a proposed change to the process?\n- compare two different approval strategies?\n- something else?" + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 13, + "output": 255, + "cacheRead": 6909, + "cacheWrite": 3523, + "totalTokens": 10700, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000013, + "output": 0.001275, + "cacheRead": 0.0006909, + "cacheWrite": 0.00440375, + "total": 0.00638265 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 81, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:58.888Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Excellent. Now I have both the universal elicitation guidance and the SDCPN-specific guidance. Now I should orient by establishing the purpose, context, and key parameters before diving into the detailed elicitation. \n\nLet me follow the Directives and begin with an orientation question that focuses on purpose and context. I should:\n1. Establish what the approval process model needs to help them decide/answer/explain/change\n2. Get enough context to understand the scope\n3. Work from a concrete case\n4. Use their vocabulary, not Petri net terms\n\nI'll start with a focused question about their purpose for the model.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good, I'm ready to help you model your approval process. Before we get into the details, let me understand what you need this model to do for you.\n\n**What's the main question or decision you want this model to help you answer?** For instance, are you trying to:\n- understand how long approvals typically take?\n- find where delays or bottlenecks happen?\n- test a proposed change to the process?\n- compare two different approval strategies?\n- something else?" + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 13, + "output": 255, + "cacheRead": 6909, + "cacheWrite": 3523, + "totalTokens": 10700, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000013, + "output": 0.001275, + "cacheRead": 0.0006909, + "cacheWrite": 0.00440375, + "total": 0.00638265 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 144 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284094725, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced84Q2XqUfvUDWEbVtgB", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KJ83PEMQVAZ9GJM94JMB", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 82, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:58.888Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0KJ83PEMQVAZ9GJM94JMB", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Excellent. Now I have both the universal elicitation guidance and the SDCPN-specific guidance. Now I should orient by establishing the purpose, context, and key parameters before diving into the detailed elicitation. \n\nLet me follow the Directives and begin with an orientation question that focuses on purpose and context. I should:\n1. Establish what the approval process model needs to help them decide/answer/explain/change\n2. Get enough context to understand the scope\n3. Work from a concrete case\n4. Use their vocabulary, not Petri net terms\n\nI'll start with a focused question about their purpose for the model.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good, I'm ready to help you model your approval process. Before we get into the details, let me understand what you need this model to do for you.\n\n**What's the main question or decision you want this model to help you answer?** For instance, are you trying to:\n- understand how long approvals typically take?\n- find where delays or bottlenecks happen?\n- test a proposed change to the process?\n- compare two different approval strategies?\n- something else?" + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 13, + "output": 255, + "cacheRead": 6909, + "cacheWrite": 3523, + "totalTokens": 10700, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000013, + "output": 0.001275, + "cacheRead": 0.0006909, + "cacheWrite": 0.00440375, + "total": 0.00638265 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 144 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284094725, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced84Q2XqUfvUDWEbVtgB", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 83, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:58.888Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model an approval process as an SDCPN (Stochastic Dynamic Coloured Petri Net) in Petrinaut. This is directly matched by the `sdcpn-modelling` skill described in my instructions. I should activate that skill before proceeding with substantive elicitation.\n\nLet me activate the skill first, then begin the elicitation process.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01LzWqDYDyEwtVaFHvwVvY2h", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2408, + "output": 154, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 2562, + "cost": { + "input": 0.002408, + "output": 0.0007700000000000001, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.0031780000000000003 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 92 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284087538, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced83sP3nC9f6GyZJ2GdZ", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LzWqDYDyEwtVaFHvwVvY2h", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284089449 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill has been activated. Now I need to follow the procedure outlined in the skill instructions. According to the skill:\n\n1. I need to orient first - establish purpose, context, boundary, horizon, accuracy need\n2. Before any consequential question, I need to complete the \"required universal-disclosure action\" which is to read `universal-elicitation.md`\n3. Then I should read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking the first focused question\n\nLet me read the required disclosure material first.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_014e2oDhwB8Aj6Uh4Tah17SG", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3746, + "output": 216, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3962, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0037459999999999998, + "output": 0.00108, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.0048259999999999996 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 120 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284089451, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced841PWAi3iaWyb7oMYT", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_014e2oDhwB8Aj6Uh4Tah17SG", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md", + "lines": 215 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284092253 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good. Now I should read the SDCPN-specific elicitation guidance.", + "thinkingSignature": "Er0CCpoBCBEYAipAYS64WSMpvS498rV8COzSaV21qpp+2Hblx/iBTWJi4Op0a8xFbJUQJy2S8qPO04tcan7IBd4FVKDHvI3o7ars0zIZY2xhdWRlLWhhaWt1LTQtNS0yMDI1MTAwMTgAQgh0aGlua2luZ1okMWNiODRmYzQtNDdhYS00ZTFmLWE2NjUtOTQwYWI5ZjgxZjg4qAG9mdzUBhIM2b2EroXvbn1WTQbwGgwjW3HBLbPoH/YRmkAiMLsHrLi2j2sZ3JjTJ1SR8VMVObg8fSmrPyjIyxlZpclIjkGK2v/HZVnl+twZlYbTASpQ6P7+HpP90Z5Q3OqTUZzr9facDeDoCng3T+NLRxjfDLTnOievajrClxedCGpiDsT6EypqTBn1ipOuY7R1ozkS2w4+/4kXaEWliVWL9P6FSW0YAQ==" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_014sGrS4MJsjH2UqRG5KdvcU", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 13, + "output": 123, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 6909, + "totalTokens": 7045, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000013, + "output": 0.0006150000000000001, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.00863625, + "total": 0.00926425 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 24 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284092256, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced84DUXXa3ZnBwtKyvVX", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_014sGrS4MJsjH2UqRG5KdvcU", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md", + "lines": 223 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284094721 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Excellent. Now I have both the universal elicitation guidance and the SDCPN-specific guidance. Now I should orient by establishing the purpose, context, and key parameters before diving into the detailed elicitation. \n\nLet me follow the Directives and begin with an orientation question that focuses on purpose and context. I should:\n1. Establish what the approval process model needs to help them decide/answer/explain/change\n2. Get enough context to understand the scope\n3. Work from a concrete case\n4. Use their vocabulary, not Petri net terms\n\nI'll start with a focused question about their purpose for the model.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good, I'm ready to help you model your approval process. Before we get into the details, let me understand what you need this model to do for you.\n\n**What's the main question or decision you want this model to help you answer?** For instance, are you trying to:\n- understand how long approvals typically take?\n- find where delays or bottlenecks happen?\n- test a proposed change to the process?\n- compare two different approval strategies?\n- something else?" + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 13, + "output": 255, + "cacheRead": 6909, + "cacheWrite": 3523, + "totalTokens": 10700, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000013, + "output": 0.001275, + "cacheRead": 0.0006909, + "cacheWrite": 0.00440375, + "total": 0.00638265 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 144 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284094725, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced84Q2XqUfvUDWEbVtgB", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 84, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:58.889Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 11369, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 85, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:58.890Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0KB6B9MJ9BQQ39M8C1KV8", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0KB71SFRFP1YKJYPFW8FQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 86, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:58.890Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0KB68Z3R50KY0CV87F62Y", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "79442d3f65c66eeb5131777447a876c259d33bfaec7155c3ad480835466bf34b", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 87, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:34:58.890Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "d2d42344c40ddeb2471eeeba437032079bd2c7083afdbc2f9de5e823f841d5b8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "ebec2ac5faab6cbbbe26eeeebc2d7ac0ba7dc637fd43ea9b5917f8e0277f5515", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "c7cb5b2222b0d1b5aff861c4056f41ba8825aca284ec774d8e4f0fbf12807314", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "321f8405c12374315d61caf466001d6b4b5cf68b04325df77a7948daaa680de1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/scenarios.json": "1844df940b8de9d10d28e9537f966920aba581b36956a9ac26a3767824ca96cb", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/protocol.md": "ef1443bb02c6c26d4ded6edf9e023579bc32cdc394f90490edfb34eaf32b8ed2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md": "8cd2749c8292f01045ab4282fc7248c07046cecaf14a586a9ef286e2876cf8bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md": "82b035268c07cc8ee4736b5ffdd392c8f153793d2ca6b9ed57271c9b6146de10", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md": "8826b85d32d6c24fbc8f678ec394600676ec61c4a0b83d0a9cfa16be87fc5d76", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "1a2417cc5f9649d459c5efbc87cd3242db99a9717622a6d86073c72835818865" + }, + "promptSelection": { + "candidateCorePromptIncluded": true, + "v3SdcpnAppendIncluded": true, + "legacyCorePromptIncluded": false, + "legacyRoleMarkerIncluded": false, + "initialSystemPromptSha256": "ad472c3919f1857f1f5f02f83bf0adb83c4795808e44f2b58813b158585b61f7" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "candidateCorePrompt": "6a458c0bbbc9dee5b4454a54b032818227ab681ba9f7beaa60d4fe9628f6eb41", + "v3SdcpnAppend": "73cac46487d33051a90cc487ea7abfc11fec4b049af11a108396ec08d44569fb", + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S1-packaged-r3.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S1-packaged-r3.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f08a0a3bdc5 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S1-packaged-r3.json @@ -0,0 +1,1754 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v3-packaged-s1-76c84a2c", + "phase": "paid", + "instrumentVersion": "v3", + "candidate": "packaged", + "scenarioId": "S1", + "scenario": { + "title": "Underspecified interactive request", + "prompt": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "stopAfter": "The first consequential question.", + "expected": "Ask one high-yield question in operational vocabulary after loading universal and SDCPN elicitation judgment." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "I'll help you build a model of your approval process as an SDCPN. Let me start by understanding the purpose and scope of what you need.\n\n**What are you aiming to do with this model?** For example, are you trying to:\n- Identify bottlenecks or delays in the approval process?\n- Understand how long approvals typically take?\n- Find scenarios where the process breaks down?\n- Redesign the workflow?\n- Something else?\n\nUnderstanding your goal will help me focus on the aspects that matter most for your decision.", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LBngW1z1oqW6NsXcKGK9Uf", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 2529, + "inputTokens": 2408, + "outputTokens": 205, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 2613, + "cost": 0.0034330000000000003 + }, + { + "durationMs": 4111, + "inputTokens": 3797, + "outputTokens": 283, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 4080, + "cost": 0.005212 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 6640, + "inputTokens": 6205, + "outputTokens": 488, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 6693, + "cost": 0.008645 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nHelp me model our approval process as an SDCPN.\n\n## Assistant\nI'll help you build a model of your approval process as an SDCPN. Let me start by understanding the purpose and scope of what you need.\n\n**What are you aiming to do with this model?** For example, are you trying to:\n- Identify bottlenecks or delays in the approval process?\n- Understand how long approvals typically take?\n- Find scenarios where the process breaks down?\n- Redesign the workflow?\n- Something else?\n\nUnderstanding your goal will help me focus on the aspects that matter most for your decision.\n- tool activate_skill (toolu_01LBngW1z1oqW6NsXcKGK9Uf): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\\n\\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\\n\\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\\n\\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\\n\\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000024", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFGME1CMDRZNVo1NFZNMFpUSDFHUlFB", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1F0MBNTZZAAZKTCE3F0BYA3", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MB12Y66F7KBP4BXTDE6J", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The user wants to model their approval process as a stochastic dynamic coloured Petri net (SDCPN). According to the instructions, I should activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation.\n\nThis is the beginning of an interactive modelling session, so I should:\n1. Activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first\n2. Then begin elicitation to understand their approval process\n3. Follow the universal elicitation principles - use their vocabulary, explore concrete cases, don't use a battery of independent questions, establish purpose-relative depth\n\nLet me activate the skill first.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LBngW1z1oqW6NsXcKGK9Uf", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 3 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good, the skill is loaded. Now I need to follow the lifecycle. The instructions say:\n\n\"Before any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\"\n\nThe person has asked me to help model their approval process as an SDCPN. This requires me to understand their actual approval process. I don't have any information about their specific process yet. So I need to do the required disclosure and then start eliciting.\n\nThe procedure says:\n1. Orient first - establish purpose and context\n2. Then elicit\n\nLet me start with orientation to understand what they need this model for, the scope, and other relevant context.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'll help you build a model of your approval process as an SDCPN. Let me start by understanding the purpose and scope of what you need.\n\n**What are you aiming to do with this model?** For example, are you trying to:\n- Identify bottlenecks or delays in the approval process?\n- Understand how long approvals typically take?\n- Find scenarios where the process breaks down?\n- Redesign the workflow?\n- Something else?\n\nUnderstanding your goal will help me focus on the aspects that matter most for your decision.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1F0MB05Z3AA53VYFAZV7PKW" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:20.070Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:20.073Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:20.093Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:20.098Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MB12Y66F7KBP4BXTDE6J", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:20.098Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MB12Y66F7KBP4BXTDE6J", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:20.098Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284120108 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MB12Y66F7KBP4BXTDE6J", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:20.762Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MB12Y66F7KBP4BXTDE6J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:20.764Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "The user wants to", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MB12Y66F7KBP4BXTDE6J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:21.767Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " model their approval process as a stochastic dynamic coloured Petri net (SDCPN). According to the instructions, I should activate the `sdcpn-", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MB12Y66F7KBP4BXTDE6J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:21.767Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "modelling` skill before substantive elicitation.\n\nThis is the beginning of an interactive modelling session, so I should:\n1. Activate the sd", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MB12Y66F7KBP4BXTDE6J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:21.768Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "cpn-modelling skill first\n2. Then begin elicitation to understand their approval process\n3. Follow the universal elicitation principles -", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MB12Y66F7KBP4BXTDE6J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:21.768Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " use their vocabulary, explore concrete cases, don't use a battery of independent questions, establish purpose-", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MB12Y66F7KBP4BXTDE6J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:22.475Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "relative depth\n\nLet me activate the skill first.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MB12Y66F7KBP4BXTDE6J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:22.475Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "The user wants to model their approval process as a stochastic dynamic coloured Petri net (SDCPN). According to the instructions, I should activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation.\n\nThis is the beginning of an interactive modelling session, so I should:\n1. Activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first\n2. Then begin elicitation to understand their approval process\n3. Follow the universal elicitation principles - use their vocabulary, explore concrete cases, don't use a battery of independent questions, establish purpose-relative depth\n\nLet me activate the skill first.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MB12Y66F7KBP4BXTDE6J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:22.475Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LBngW1z1oqW6NsXcKGK9Uf", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MB12Y66F7KBP4BXTDE6J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:22.477Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LBngW1z1oqW6NsXcKGK9Uf", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\": \"sdcpn-modelling", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MB12Y66F7KBP4BXTDE6J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:22.614Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LBngW1z1oqW6NsXcKGK9Uf", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MB12Y66F7KBP4BXTDE6J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:22.614Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MB12Y66F7KBP4BXTDE6J", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 2529, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced86GeaTGshuU8we5sGv", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model their approval process as a stochastic dynamic coloured Petri net (SDCPN). According to the instructions, I should activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation.\n\nThis is the beginning of an interactive modelling session, so I should:\n1. Activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first\n2. Then begin elicitation to understand their approval process\n3. Follow the universal elicitation principles - use their vocabulary, explore concrete cases, don't use a battery of independent questions, establish purpose-relative depth\n\nLet me activate the skill first.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01LBngW1z1oqW6NsXcKGK9Uf", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2408, + "output": 205, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 2613, + "cost": { + "input": 0.002408, + "output": 0.001025, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.0034330000000000003 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:22.627Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model their approval process as a stochastic dynamic coloured Petri net (SDCPN). According to the instructions, I should activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation.\n\nThis is the beginning of an interactive modelling session, so I should:\n1. Activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first\n2. Then begin elicitation to understand their approval process\n3. Follow the universal elicitation principles - use their vocabulary, explore concrete cases, don't use a battery of independent questions, establish purpose-relative depth\n\nLet me activate the skill first.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01LBngW1z1oqW6NsXcKGK9Uf", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2408, + "output": 205, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 2613, + "cost": { + "input": 0.002408, + "output": 0.001025, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.0034330000000000003 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 143 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284120108, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced86GeaTGshuU8we5sGv", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MB12Y66F7KBP4BXTDE6J", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:22.628Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LBngW1z1oqW6NsXcKGK9Uf", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MB12Y66F7KBP4BXTDE6J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:22.629Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LBngW1z1oqW6NsXcKGK9Uf", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284122632 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MB12Y66F7KBP4BXTDE6J", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:22.632Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LBngW1z1oqW6NsXcKGK9Uf", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284122632 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MB12Y66F7KBP4BXTDE6J", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:22.632Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LBngW1z1oqW6NsXcKGK9Uf", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 3, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MB12Y66F7KBP4BXTDE6J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:22.633Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MB12Y66F7KBP4BXTDE6J", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model their approval process as a stochastic dynamic coloured Petri net (SDCPN). According to the instructions, I should activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation.\n\nThis is the beginning of an interactive modelling session, so I should:\n1. Activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first\n2. Then begin elicitation to understand their approval process\n3. Follow the universal elicitation principles - use their vocabulary, explore concrete cases, don't use a battery of independent questions, establish purpose-relative depth\n\nLet me activate the skill first.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01LBngW1z1oqW6NsXcKGK9Uf", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2408, + "output": 205, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 2613, + "cost": { + "input": 0.002408, + "output": 0.001025, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.0034330000000000003 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 143 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284120108, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced86GeaTGshuU8we5sGv", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LBngW1z1oqW6NsXcKGK9Uf", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284122632 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:22.633Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MDGABB8V2BRY9B45W06C", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:22.634Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MDGABB8V2BRY9B45W06C", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model their approval process as a stochastic dynamic coloured Petri net (SDCPN). According to the instructions, I should activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation.\n\nThis is the beginning of an interactive modelling session, so I should:\n1. Activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first\n2. Then begin elicitation to understand their approval process\n3. Follow the universal elicitation principles - use their vocabulary, explore concrete cases, don't use a battery of independent questions, establish purpose-relative depth\n\nLet me activate the skill first.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01LBngW1z1oqW6NsXcKGK9Uf", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LBngW1z1oqW6NsXcKGK9Uf", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:22.634Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284122635 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MDGABB8V2BRY9B45W06C", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:23.259Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MDGABB8V2BRY9B45W06C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:23.260Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "Good", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MDGABB8V2BRY9B45W06C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:24.262Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ", the skill is loaded. Now I need to follow the lifecycle. The instructions say:\n\n\"", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MDGABB8V2BRY9B45W06C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:24.262Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "Before any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MDGABB8V2BRY9B45W06C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:24.262Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\"\n\nThe person has asked me to help model their", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MDGABB8V2BRY9B45W06C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:25.492Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " approval process as an SDCPN. This requires me to understand their actual approval process. I", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MDGABB8V2BRY9B45W06C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:25.492Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " don't have any information about their specific process yet. So I need to do the required disclosure", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MDGABB8V2BRY9B45W06C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:25.492Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " and then start eliciting.\n\nThe procedure says:\n1. Orient first - establish purpose and context\n2. Then elicit\n\nLet me start with", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MDGABB8V2BRY9B45W06C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:25.492Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " orientation to understand what they need this model for, the scope, and other relevant context.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MDGABB8V2BRY9B45W06C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:25.610Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "Good, the skill is loaded. Now I need to follow the lifecycle. The instructions say:\n\n\"Before any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\"\n\nThe person has asked me to help model their approval process as an SDCPN. This requires me to understand their actual approval process. I don't have any information about their specific process yet. So I need to do the required disclosure and then start eliciting.\n\nThe procedure says:\n1. Orient first - establish purpose and context\n2. Then elicit\n\nLet me start with orientation to understand what they need this model for, the scope, and other relevant context.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MDGABB8V2BRY9B45W06C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:25.611Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "I'll help you build a model of", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MDGABB8V2BRY9B45W06C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:26.616Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " your approval process as an SDCPN. Let me start by understanding the purpose and scope of what you need.\n\n**What are you aiming to do with this model?", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MDGABB8V2BRY9B45W06C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:26.616Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "** For example, are you trying to:\n- Identify bottlenecks or delays in the approval process?\n- Understand how", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MDGABB8V2BRY9B45W06C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:26.616Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " long approvals typically take?\n- Find scenarios where the process breaks down?\n- Redesign the workflow?\n- Something else?\n\nUnderstanding", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MDGABB8V2BRY9B45W06C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:26.616Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " your goal will help me focus on the aspects that matter most for your decision.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MDGABB8V2BRY9B45W06C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:26.743Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MDGABB8V2BRY9B45W06C", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4111, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced86THHxqcaBbxoD7UhQ", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is loaded. Now I need to follow the lifecycle. The instructions say:\n\n\"Before any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\"\n\nThe person has asked me to help model their approval process as an SDCPN. This requires me to understand their actual approval process. I don't have any information about their specific process yet. So I need to do the required disclosure and then start eliciting.\n\nThe procedure says:\n1. Orient first - establish purpose and context\n2. Then elicit\n\nLet me start with orientation to understand what they need this model for, the scope, and other relevant context.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'll help you build a model of your approval process as an SDCPN. Let me start by understanding the purpose and scope of what you need.\n\n**What are you aiming to do with this model?** For example, are you trying to:\n- Identify bottlenecks or delays in the approval process?\n- Understand how long approvals typically take?\n- Find scenarios where the process breaks down?\n- Redesign the workflow?\n- Something else?\n\nUnderstanding your goal will help me focus on the aspects that matter most for your decision." + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 3797, + "output": 283, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 4080, + "cost": { + "input": 0.003797, + "output": 0.001415, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005212 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:26.745Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is loaded. Now I need to follow the lifecycle. The instructions say:\n\n\"Before any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\"\n\nThe person has asked me to help model their approval process as an SDCPN. This requires me to understand their actual approval process. I don't have any information about their specific process yet. So I need to do the required disclosure and then start eliciting.\n\nThe procedure says:\n1. Orient first - establish purpose and context\n2. Then elicit\n\nLet me start with orientation to understand what they need this model for, the scope, and other relevant context.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'll help you build a model of your approval process as an SDCPN. Let me start by understanding the purpose and scope of what you need.\n\n**What are you aiming to do with this model?** For example, are you trying to:\n- Identify bottlenecks or delays in the approval process?\n- Understand how long approvals typically take?\n- Find scenarios where the process breaks down?\n- Redesign the workflow?\n- Something else?\n\nUnderstanding your goal will help me focus on the aspects that matter most for your decision." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3797, + "output": 283, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 4080, + "cost": { + "input": 0.003797, + "output": 0.001415, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005212 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 155 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284122635, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced86THHxqcaBbxoD7UhQ", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MDGABB8V2BRY9B45W06C", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:26.745Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MDGABB8V2BRY9B45W06C", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is loaded. Now I need to follow the lifecycle. The instructions say:\n\n\"Before any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\"\n\nThe person has asked me to help model their approval process as an SDCPN. This requires me to understand their actual approval process. I don't have any information about their specific process yet. So I need to do the required disclosure and then start eliciting.\n\nThe procedure says:\n1. Orient first - establish purpose and context\n2. Then elicit\n\nLet me start with orientation to understand what they need this model for, the scope, and other relevant context.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'll help you build a model of your approval process as an SDCPN. Let me start by understanding the purpose and scope of what you need.\n\n**What are you aiming to do with this model?** For example, are you trying to:\n- Identify bottlenecks or delays in the approval process?\n- Understand how long approvals typically take?\n- Find scenarios where the process breaks down?\n- Redesign the workflow?\n- Something else?\n\nUnderstanding your goal will help me focus on the aspects that matter most for your decision." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3797, + "output": 283, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 4080, + "cost": { + "input": 0.003797, + "output": 0.001415, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005212 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 155 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284122635, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced86THHxqcaBbxoD7UhQ", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:26.745Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants to model their approval process as a stochastic dynamic coloured Petri net (SDCPN). According to the instructions, I should activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation.\n\nThis is the beginning of an interactive modelling session, so I should:\n1. Activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first\n2. Then begin elicitation to understand their approval process\n3. Follow the universal elicitation principles - use their vocabulary, explore concrete cases, don't use a battery of independent questions, establish purpose-relative depth\n\nLet me activate the skill first.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01LBngW1z1oqW6NsXcKGK9Uf", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2408, + "output": 205, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 2613, + "cost": { + "input": 0.002408, + "output": 0.001025, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.0034330000000000003 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 143 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284120108, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced86GeaTGshuU8we5sGv", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LBngW1z1oqW6NsXcKGK9Uf", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284122632 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is loaded. Now I need to follow the lifecycle. The instructions say:\n\n\"Before any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\"\n\nThe person has asked me to help model their approval process as an SDCPN. This requires me to understand their actual approval process. I don't have any information about their specific process yet. So I need to do the required disclosure and then start eliciting.\n\nThe procedure says:\n1. Orient first - establish purpose and context\n2. Then elicit\n\nLet me start with orientation to understand what they need this model for, the scope, and other relevant context.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'll help you build a model of your approval process as an SDCPN. Let me start by understanding the purpose and scope of what you need.\n\n**What are you aiming to do with this model?** For example, are you trying to:\n- Identify bottlenecks or delays in the approval process?\n- Understand how long approvals typically take?\n- Find scenarios where the process breaks down?\n- Redesign the workflow?\n- Something else?\n\nUnderstanding your goal will help me focus on the aspects that matter most for your decision." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 3797, + "output": 283, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 4080, + "cost": { + "input": 0.003797, + "output": 0.001415, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005212 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 155 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284122635, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced86THHxqcaBbxoD7UhQ", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:26.745Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 6653, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:26.746Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MB07QGNH7JKERJFADP7X", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MB0XHH4NNT6RRX08H9C0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:26.746Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MB04Y5Z54VM0ZTH1GRQA", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "1d4b26d22e723085475db219674399dbaae35fd1f9f869a647487315fb68a202", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:26.746Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "d2d42344c40ddeb2471eeeba437032079bd2c7083afdbc2f9de5e823f841d5b8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "ebec2ac5faab6cbbbe26eeeebc2d7ac0ba7dc637fd43ea9b5917f8e0277f5515", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "c7cb5b2222b0d1b5aff861c4056f41ba8825aca284ec774d8e4f0fbf12807314", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "321f8405c12374315d61caf466001d6b4b5cf68b04325df77a7948daaa680de1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/scenarios.json": "1844df940b8de9d10d28e9537f966920aba581b36956a9ac26a3767824ca96cb", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/protocol.md": "ef1443bb02c6c26d4ded6edf9e023579bc32cdc394f90490edfb34eaf32b8ed2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md": "8cd2749c8292f01045ab4282fc7248c07046cecaf14a586a9ef286e2876cf8bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md": "82b035268c07cc8ee4736b5ffdd392c8f153793d2ca6b9ed57271c9b6146de10", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md": "8826b85d32d6c24fbc8f678ec394600676ec61c4a0b83d0a9cfa16be87fc5d76", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "1a2417cc5f9649d459c5efbc87cd3242db99a9717622a6d86073c72835818865" + }, + "promptSelection": { + "candidateCorePromptIncluded": true, + "v3SdcpnAppendIncluded": true, + "legacyCorePromptIncluded": false, + "legacyRoleMarkerIncluded": false, + "initialSystemPromptSha256": "ad472c3919f1857f1f5f02f83bf0adb83c4795808e44f2b58813b158585b61f7" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "candidateCorePrompt": "6a458c0bbbc9dee5b4454a54b032818227ab681ba9f7beaa60d4fe9628f6eb41", + "v3SdcpnAppend": "73cac46487d33051a90cc487ea7abfc11fec4b049af11a108396ec08d44569fb", + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S2-independent-r1.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S2-independent-r1.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..51868f35a6c --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S2-independent-r1.json @@ -0,0 +1,3740 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v3-independent-s2-84377260", + "phase": "paid", + "instrumentVersion": "v3", + "candidate": "independent", + "scenarioId": "S2", + "scenario": { + "title": "Adequate construct-only request", + "prompt": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them.", + "stopAfter": "The first consequential construction decision.", + "expected": "Enter construction guidance without loading universal elicitation or asking a question." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "I have the construction and checks guidance. Analyzing the supplied account against the construction boundary:\n\n**Confirmed process spine:** Requests flow in (every 30 min) → reserved and checked (20 min fixed) → outcome deterministically recorded (approved or rejected based on request data) → reviewer released → request leaves.\n\n**Initial state and scenario:** 1 available reviewer (baseline); 2 available reviewers (comparison). Reviewers cannot check concurrently. Deterministic eligibility rule operates on request data already present.\n\n**Purpose is clear:** compare turnaround time under reviewer counts 1 vs 2.\n\n---\n\n## First Consequential Construction Decision\n\n**The deterministic approval/rejection branch must be represented in the Request colour domain.**\n\nThe account establishes that the eligibility rule selects approved or rejected deterministically \"from request data already carried by the request.\" In SDCPN, this means the Request colour type must carry either:\n- An explicit `eligibility` or `decision` attribute with values {approved, rejected}, *or* \n- Sufficient request properties (e.g., `amount`, `type`, `category`) from which a guard condition can derive the deterministic outcome\n\nWithout this representation in the colour schema, no SDCPN structure can implement the deterministic branching that the account requires. The branching must be *exclusive by condition*, not probabilistic.\n\n**Consequential because:** The choice between embedding the decision as colour data versus deriving it from other properties affects whether guards on outcome-recording transitions can faithfully represent \"deterministically selects ... from request data already carried.\" This is the minimum representational commitment required before placing requests, reservers, or branching paths into the net.\n\n---\n\n**Stop here, as instructed.** No workpiece, net mutation, or further construction proceeds without direction to resume.", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling", "elicitation"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "toolu_01UPJU8nQwTFztr5iAosWgQX", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "toolu_016b2prAhZsAWGgce4vp7Kn2", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + }, + "output": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "toolu_015rdm1uCJDxLckb47tWuhUV", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + }, + "output": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [ + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md", + "sha256": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694" + }, + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "sha256": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5" + } + ], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 14512, + "inputTokens": 2687, + "outputTokens": 1038, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 3725, + "cost": 0.007877 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3123, + "inputTokens": 12, + "outputTokens": 359, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4854, + "totalTokens": 5225, + "cost": 0.0078745 + }, + { + "durationMs": 13852, + "inputTokens": 14, + "outputTokens": 1119, + "cacheReadTokens": 4854, + "cacheWriteTokens": 3426, + "totalTokens": 9413, + "cost": 0.010376900000000001 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 31487, + "inputTokens": 2713, + "outputTokens": 2516, + "cacheReadTokens": 4854, + "cacheWriteTokens": 8280, + "totalTokens": 18363, + "cost": 0.026128400000000003 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nUse the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them.\n\n## Assistant\nI have the construction and checks guidance. Analyzing the supplied account against the construction boundary:\n\n**Confirmed process spine:** Requests flow in (every 30 min) → reserved and checked (20 min fixed) → outcome deterministically recorded (approved or rejected based on request data) → reviewer released → request leaves.\n\n**Initial state and scenario:** 1 available reviewer (baseline); 2 available reviewers (comparison). Reviewers cannot check concurrently. Deterministic eligibility rule operates on request data already present.\n\n**Purpose is clear:** compare turnaround time under reviewer counts 1 vs 2.\n\n---\n\n## First Consequential Construction Decision\n\n**The deterministic approval/rejection branch must be represented in the Request colour domain.**\n\nThe account establishes that the eligibility rule selects approved or rejected deterministically \"from request data already carried by the request.\" In SDCPN, this means the Request colour type must carry either:\n- An explicit `eligibility` or `decision` attribute with values {approved, rejected}, *or* \n- Sufficient request properties (e.g., `amount`, `type`, `category`) from which a guard condition can derive the deterministic outcome\n\nWithout this representation in the colour schema, no SDCPN structure can implement the deterministic branching that the account requires. The branching must be *exclusive by condition*, not probabilistic.\n\n**Consequential because:** The choice between embedding the decision as colour data versus deriving it from other properties affects whether guards on outcome-recording transitions can faithfully represent \"deterministically selects ... from request data already carried.\" This is the minimum representational commitment required before placing requests, reservers, or branching paths into the net.\n\n---\n\n**Stop here, as instructed.** No workpiece, net mutation, or further construction proceeds without direction to resume.\n- tool activate_skill (toolu_01UPJU8nQwTFztr5iAosWgQX): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\\n\\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\\n\\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\\n\\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\\n\\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (toolu_016b2prAhZsAWGgce4vp7Kn2): \"# SDCPN Construction\\n\\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\\n\\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\\n\\n## Construction boundary\\n\\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\\n\\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\\n\\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\\n\\n## Mapping principles\\n\\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\\n| --- | --- |\\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\\n\\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\\n\\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\\n\\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\\n\\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\\n\\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\\n\\n## Construction patterns\\n\\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\\n\\n### Timed work\\n\\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\\n\\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\\n\\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\\n\\n### Contended resource\\n\\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\\n\\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\\n\\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\\n\\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\\n\\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\\n\\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\\n\\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\\n\\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\\n\\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\\n\\n### Mode change\\n\\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\\n\\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\\n\\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\\n\\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\\n\\n### Spatial transfer\\n\\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\\n\\n### Hidden waiting\\n\\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\\n\\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\\n\\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\\n\\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\\n\\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\\n\\nNot acceptable:\\n\\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\\n\\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\\n\\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\\n\\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\\n\\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\\n\\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (toolu_015rdm1uCJDxLckb47tWuhUV): \"# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\\n\\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\\n\\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\\n\\n## Before construction\\n\\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\\n\\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\\n\\n## During construction\\n\\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\\n\\n## Structural validity\\n\\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\\n\\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\\n\\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\\n\\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\\n\\n## Existing-net revision\\n\\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\\n\\n## Delivery\\n\\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\\n\\nState plainly:\\n\\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\\n\\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000046", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFGME5DMEFGOUJWUzdXMzlZNks2NlJC", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1F0NCR946DCHVJWY94A2R55", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The user is providing a complete account of an operational process and explicitly instructing me not to interview, not to mutate a net, and to stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision.\n\nLet me activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first, as instructed in my directives.\n\nThe process described:\n1. Requests arrive one per 30 minutes\n2. A reviewer reserves a request and checks it for 20 minutes (fixed)\n3. The eligibility rule deterministically determines approved/rejected based on request data\n4. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer\n5. Approved/rejected requests leave the system\n6. Initially 1 available reviewer; comparison scenario has 2 available reviewers\n7. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n8. Boundary: submission through approval or rejection\n9. Requests are distinct work items\n\nKey elements for SDCPN:\n- Places: waiting requests, reviewer available, reviewer busy checking, request approved, request rejected\n- Transitions: submit request, start check, finish check and approve, finish check and reject\n- Colours: request type or request ID (to distinguish requests)\n- Stochastic elements: arrivals (deterministic 30-min), check duration (fixed 20-min), approval decision (deterministic based on request data)\n\nThe purpose is to compare turnaround under 1 vs 2 reviewers. This means I need to model the system in a way that allows parameterization of reviewer count.\n\nLet me think about the structure:\n- A \"Request\" colour domain with attributes or just IDs\n- Places:\n - Submitted (requests waiting to be checked)\n - CheckInProgress (request being checked, with associated reviewer)\n - Approved (checked and approved)\n - Rejected (checked and rejected)\n - Reviewer states (Available, Busy)\n\nActually, in a Petri net, reviewers are typically represented as tokens in a \"AvailableReviewers\" place. \n\nThe number of tokens represents the count of reviewers available, letting me swap between 1 and 2 for the comparison scenario just by changing initial marking. So the skeleton is: SubmittedRequests and AvailableReviewers feed StartCheck, producing a token in CheckInProgress that consumes a reviewer; a timed transition then resolves deterministically to ApprovedRequests or RejectedRequests while returning the reviewer token to AvailableReviewers.\n\nThe interesting choice is how to encode that deterministic approval/rejection outcome. Options I see: give requests a colour marking eligibility, split FinishCheck into two transitions gated by request attributes, or fake it with stochastic weights pinned to 0/1. Since the decision must be deterministic per request, coloured tokens or attribute-based guards seem more faithful than probability tricks. I should pin down this branching mechanism as the first real construction decision and move forward from there.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01UPJU8nQwTFztr5iAosWgQX", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 4 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I need to read the relevant resources for construct-only execution. Let me read pn-construction.md and checks.md to understand the construction procedure. But first, let me review the instruction:\n\n\"Use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools.\"\n\nAnd: \"Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\"\n\nSo I need to:\n1. Read pn-construction.md and checks.md\n2. Analyze the supplied account\n3. State the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n4. Stop without actually constructing or mutating a net\n\nLet me read those resources first.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_016b2prAhZsAWGgce4vp7Kn2", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + }, + "output": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_015rdm1uCJDxLckb47tWuhUV", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + }, + "output": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n", + "durationMs": 1 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good. Now I have the construction and checks guidance. The instruction is to read the supplied account and state the first consequential SDCPN construction decision without interviewing or mutating a net.\n\nLet me analyze the supplied account against the construction boundary checklist:\n\n**Process spine:**\n- What flows: requests (distinct work items)\n- What admits them: submission (one per 30 minutes)\n- What happens in order:\n 1. Request submitted\n 2. Reviewer reserves the request and becomes unavailable\n 3. Reviewer checks for 20 minutes (fixed)\n 4. Reviewer records outcome (deterministically based on request data): approved OR rejected\n 5. Reviewer is released\n 6. Request leaves system (approved or rejected)\n- What changes the path: the eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected\n- What resources are occupied: reviewers (1 in baseline, 2 in comparison)\n- What outcome ends the case: leaving the system as approved or rejected\n\n**Initial state:** 1 available reviewer (baseline); 2 available reviewers (comparison scenario)\n\n**Constraints:** \n- A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n- Eligibility rule is deterministic based on request data already carried\n- Fixed timing: arrivals every 30 min, checks take 20 min\n- Boundary: submission through approval/rejection only\n\n**Purpose:** compare approval turnaround under 1 vs 2 reviewers\n\nThis is well-specified. Now, what is the first consequential SDCPN construction decision?\n\nLooking at the structure:\n1. Requests flow through the system - they will be coloured tokens\n2. Reviewers are resources - they will be tokens in a resource place\n3. The deterministic branching (approved vs rejected) happens at outcome recording\n\nThe first consequential decision is about the **deterministic branching representation**. Specifically:\n\nThe account states: \"Recording the outcome releases the reviewer\" and \"the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\"\nIn SDCPN, this creates a branching point, with a few candidate ways to model it: a single \"RecordOutcome\" transition with a guard splitting into approved/rejected arcs, two separate guarded transitions \"RecordApproved\"/\"RecordRejected\", or a colour that explicitly stores the eligibility determination as an attribute.\n\nThe consequential decision is: **Does the Request colour domain need to explicitly carry the eligibility determination as an attribute, or will guards on outcome-recording transitions derive it from other request properties?**\n\nThis matters because it shapes whether eligibility is data-carried or guard-computed.\n- If eligibility is not carried as colour data, the net cannot represent deterministic branching through guards alone in Petrinaut\n- If eligibility IS carried, the request colour schema must include this attribute\n- The deterministic branching must be structurally exclusive — one path only, not probabilistic", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I have the construction and checks guidance. Analyzing the supplied account against the construction boundary:\n\n**Confirmed process spine:** Requests flow in (every 30 min) → reserved and checked (20 min fixed) → outcome deterministically recorded (approved or rejected based on request data) → reviewer released → request leaves.\n\n**Initial state and scenario:** 1 available reviewer (baseline); 2 available reviewers (comparison). Reviewers cannot check concurrently. Deterministic eligibility rule operates on request data already present.\n\n**Purpose is clear:** compare turnaround time under reviewer counts 1 vs 2.\n\n---\n\n## First Consequential Construction Decision\n\n**The deterministic approval/rejection branch must be represented in the Request colour domain.**\n\nThe account establishes that the eligibility rule selects approved or rejected deterministically \"from request data already carried by the request.\" In SDCPN, this means the Request colour type must carry either:\n- An explicit `eligibility` or `decision` attribute with values {approved, rejected}, *or* \n- Sufficient request properties (e.g., `amount`, `type`, `category`) from which a guard condition can derive the deterministic outcome\n\nWithout this representation in the colour schema, no SDCPN structure can implement the deterministic branching that the account requires. The branching must be *exclusive by condition*, not probabilistic.\n\n**Consequential because:** The choice between embedding the decision as colour data versus deriving it from other properties affects whether guards on outcome-recording transitions can faithfully represent \"deterministically selects ... from request data already carried.\" This is the minimum representational commitment required before placing requests, reservers, or branching paths into the net.\n\n---\n\n**Stop here, as instructed.** No workpiece, net mutation, or further construction proceeds without direction to resume.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1F0NC0BYWJEZ9J3NTPGG8CQ" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:53.868Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:53.871Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:53.894Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:53.899Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:53.900Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:53.900Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284153911 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:54.634Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:54.636Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "The", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:55.639Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " user is providing a complete account of an operational process and explicitly instructing me not to interview, not to mutate a", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:55.639Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " net, and to stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision.\n\nLet me activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first, as instructed in my dir", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:55.640Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "ectives.\n\nThe process described:\n1. Requests arrive one per 30 minutes\n2. A reviewer reserves a request and checks it for 20 minutes (fixed", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:55.640Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ")\n3. The eligibility rule deterministically determines approved/rejected based on request data\n4. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer\n5. Approved/rejected requests leave the system\n6. Initially", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:56.921Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " 1 available reviewer; comparison scenario has 2 available reviewers\n7. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n8. Boundary: submission through", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:56.921Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " approval or rejection\n9. Requests are distinct work items\n\nKey elements for SDCPN:\n- Places: waiting requests, reviewer", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:56.921Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " available, reviewer busy checking, request approved, request rejected\n- Transitions: submit request,", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:56.921Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " start check, finish check and approve, finish check and reject\n- Colours: request type or request", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:58.255Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " ID (to distinguish requests)\n- Stochastic elements: arrivals (deterministic 30-min", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:58.255Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "), check duration (fixed 20-min), approval decision (deterministic based on request data)\n\nThe purpose is to compare turnaround under ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:58.255Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "1 vs 2 reviewers. This means I need to model the system in a way that allows parameterization of reviewer count.\n\nLet me think", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:58.255Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " about the structure:\n- A \"Request\" colour domain with attributes or just IDs\n- Places:\n - Submitted", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:59.467Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " (requests waiting to be checked)\n - CheckInProgress (request being checked, with associated reviewer)\n - Approved (", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:59.467Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "checked and approved)\n - Rejected (checked and rejected)\n - Reviewer states (Available, Busy)\n\nActually, in a Petri net, reviewers are typically represented", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:59.467Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " as tokens in a \"AvailableReviewers\" place. ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:00.715Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "\n\nThe number", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:03.271Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " of t", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:03.271Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "okens represents the count", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:03.271Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " of reviewers available, letting me swap between 1 and 2 for the comparison scenario just by changing initial mar", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:03.271Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "king. So the skeleton is: SubmittedRequests and AvailableReviewers feed StartCheck, producing a token in CheckInProg", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:04.400Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "ress that consumes a reviewer; a timed transition then resolves deterministically to ApprovedRequests or RejectedRequests while returning the reviewer token to AvailableReviewers.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:04.400Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "\n\nThe", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:06.683Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " interesting choice is how to encode that deterministic approval/rejection outcome. Options I see: give requests a colour", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:06.683Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " marking eligibility, split FinishCheck into two transitions gated by request attributes, or fake it with stochastic weights pinned to 0/1. Since", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:06.683Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " the decision must be deterministic per request, coloured tokens or attribute-based guards seem more faithful than probability", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:07.782Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " tricks. I should pin down this branching mechanism as the first real construction decision and move forward from there.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:07.782Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "The user is providing a complete account of an operational process and explicitly instructing me not to interview, not to mutate a net, and to stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision.\n\nLet me activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first, as instructed in my directives.\n\nThe process described:\n1. Requests arrive one per 30 minutes\n2. A reviewer reserves a request and checks it for 20 minutes (fixed)\n3. The eligibility rule deterministically determines approved/rejected based on request data\n4. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer\n5. Approved/rejected requests leave the system\n6. Initially 1 available reviewer; comparison scenario has 2 available reviewers\n7. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n8. Boundary: submission through approval or rejection\n9. Requests are distinct work items\n\nKey elements for SDCPN:\n- Places: waiting requests, reviewer available, reviewer busy checking, request approved, request rejected\n- Transitions: submit request, start check, finish check and approve, finish check and reject\n- Colours: request type or request ID (to distinguish requests)\n- Stochastic elements: arrivals (deterministic 30-min), check duration (fixed 20-min), approval decision (deterministic based on request data)\n\nThe purpose is to compare turnaround under 1 vs 2 reviewers. This means I need to model the system in a way that allows parameterization of reviewer count.\n\nLet me think about the structure:\n- A \"Request\" colour domain with attributes or just IDs\n- Places:\n - Submitted (requests waiting to be checked)\n - CheckInProgress (request being checked, with associated reviewer)\n - Approved (checked and approved)\n - Rejected (checked and rejected)\n - Reviewer states (Available, Busy)\n\nActually, in a Petri net, reviewers are typically represented as tokens in a \"AvailableReviewers\" place. \n\nThe number of tokens represents the count of reviewers available, letting me swap between 1 and 2 for the comparison scenario just by changing initial marking. So the skeleton is: SubmittedRequests and AvailableReviewers feed StartCheck, producing a token in CheckInProgress that consumes a reviewer; a timed transition then resolves deterministically to ApprovedRequests or RejectedRequests while returning the reviewer token to AvailableReviewers.\n\nThe interesting choice is how to encode that deterministic approval/rejection outcome. Options I see: give requests a colour marking eligibility, split FinishCheck into two transitions gated by request attributes, or fake it with stochastic weights pinned to 0/1. Since the decision must be deterministic per request, coloured tokens or attribute-based guards seem more faithful than probability tricks. I should pin down this branching mechanism as the first real construction decision and move forward from there.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:08.403Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01UPJU8nQwTFztr5iAosWgQX", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:08.404Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01UPJU8nQwTFztr5iAosWgQX", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\": \"sdcpn-modelling", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:08.407Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01UPJU8nQwTFztr5iAosWgQX", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:08.407Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 14512, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced88mHpKmuJT7DH3vkok", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is providing a complete account of an operational process and explicitly instructing me not to interview, not to mutate a net, and to stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision.\n\nLet me activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first, as instructed in my directives.\n\nThe process described:\n1. Requests arrive one per 30 minutes\n2. A reviewer reserves a request and checks it for 20 minutes (fixed)\n3. The eligibility rule deterministically determines approved/rejected based on request data\n4. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer\n5. Approved/rejected requests leave the system\n6. Initially 1 available reviewer; comparison scenario has 2 available reviewers\n7. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n8. Boundary: submission through approval or rejection\n9. Requests are distinct work items\n\nKey elements for SDCPN:\n- Places: waiting requests, reviewer available, reviewer busy checking, request approved, request rejected\n- Transitions: submit request, start check, finish check and approve, finish check and reject\n- Colours: request type or request ID (to distinguish requests)\n- Stochastic elements: arrivals (deterministic 30-min), check duration (fixed 20-min), approval decision (deterministic based on request data)\n\nThe purpose is to compare turnaround under 1 vs 2 reviewers. This means I need to model the system in a way that allows parameterization of reviewer count.\n\nLet me think about the structure:\n- A \"Request\" colour domain with attributes or just IDs\n- Places:\n - Submitted (requests waiting to be checked)\n - CheckInProgress (request being checked, with associated reviewer)\n - Approved (checked and approved)\n - Rejected (checked and rejected)\n - Reviewer states (Available, Busy)\n\nActually, in a Petri net, reviewers are typically represented as tokens in a \"AvailableReviewers\" place. \n\nThe number of tokens represents the count of reviewers available, letting me swap between 1 and 2 for the comparison scenario just by changing initial marking. So the skeleton is: SubmittedRequests and AvailableReviewers feed StartCheck, producing a token in CheckInProgress that consumes a reviewer; a timed transition then resolves deterministically to ApprovedRequests or RejectedRequests while returning the reviewer token to AvailableReviewers.\n\nThe interesting choice is how to encode that deterministic approval/rejection outcome. Options I see: give requests a colour marking eligibility, split FinishCheck into two transitions gated by request attributes, or fake it with stochastic weights pinned to 0/1. Since the decision must be deterministic per request, coloured tokens or attribute-based guards seem more faithful than probability tricks. I should pin down this branching mechanism as the first real construction decision and move forward from there.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01UPJU8nQwTFztr5iAosWgQX", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2687, + "output": 1038, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3725, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0026869999999999997, + "output": 0.00519, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.007877 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:08.412Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is providing a complete account of an operational process and explicitly instructing me not to interview, not to mutate a net, and to stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision.\n\nLet me activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first, as instructed in my directives.\n\nThe process described:\n1. Requests arrive one per 30 minutes\n2. A reviewer reserves a request and checks it for 20 minutes (fixed)\n3. The eligibility rule deterministically determines approved/rejected based on request data\n4. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer\n5. Approved/rejected requests leave the system\n6. Initially 1 available reviewer; comparison scenario has 2 available reviewers\n7. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n8. Boundary: submission through approval or rejection\n9. Requests are distinct work items\n\nKey elements for SDCPN:\n- Places: waiting requests, reviewer available, reviewer busy checking, request approved, request rejected\n- Transitions: submit request, start check, finish check and approve, finish check and reject\n- Colours: request type or request ID (to distinguish requests)\n- Stochastic elements: arrivals (deterministic 30-min), check duration (fixed 20-min), approval decision (deterministic based on request data)\n\nThe purpose is to compare turnaround under 1 vs 2 reviewers. This means I need to model the system in a way that allows parameterization of reviewer count.\n\nLet me think about the structure:\n- A \"Request\" colour domain with attributes or just IDs\n- Places:\n - Submitted (requests waiting to be checked)\n - CheckInProgress (request being checked, with associated reviewer)\n - Approved (checked and approved)\n - Rejected (checked and rejected)\n - Reviewer states (Available, Busy)\n\nActually, in a Petri net, reviewers are typically represented as tokens in a \"AvailableReviewers\" place. \n\nThe number of tokens represents the count of reviewers available, letting me swap between 1 and 2 for the comparison scenario just by changing initial marking. So the skeleton is: SubmittedRequests and AvailableReviewers feed StartCheck, producing a token in CheckInProgress that consumes a reviewer; a timed transition then resolves deterministically to ApprovedRequests or RejectedRequests while returning the reviewer token to AvailableReviewers.\n\nThe interesting choice is how to encode that deterministic approval/rejection outcome. Options I see: give requests a colour marking eligibility, split FinishCheck into two transitions gated by request attributes, or fake it with stochastic weights pinned to 0/1. Since the decision must be deterministic per request, coloured tokens or attribute-based guards seem more faithful than probability tricks. I should pin down this branching mechanism as the first real construction decision and move forward from there.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01UPJU8nQwTFztr5iAosWgQX", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2687, + "output": 1038, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3725, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0026869999999999997, + "output": 0.00519, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.007877 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 976 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284153911, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced88mHpKmuJT7DH3vkok", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:08.412Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01UPJU8nQwTFztr5iAosWgQX", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:08.414Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01UPJU8nQwTFztr5iAosWgQX", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284168417 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:08.417Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01UPJU8nQwTFztr5iAosWgQX", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284168417 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:08.417Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01UPJU8nQwTFztr5iAosWgQX", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 4, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:08.418Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NC1CKCYYZHB26H8BTSY3", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is providing a complete account of an operational process and explicitly instructing me not to interview, not to mutate a net, and to stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision.\n\nLet me activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first, as instructed in my directives.\n\nThe process described:\n1. Requests arrive one per 30 minutes\n2. A reviewer reserves a request and checks it for 20 minutes (fixed)\n3. The eligibility rule deterministically determines approved/rejected based on request data\n4. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer\n5. Approved/rejected requests leave the system\n6. Initially 1 available reviewer; comparison scenario has 2 available reviewers\n7. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n8. Boundary: submission through approval or rejection\n9. Requests are distinct work items\n\nKey elements for SDCPN:\n- Places: waiting requests, reviewer available, reviewer busy checking, request approved, request rejected\n- Transitions: submit request, start check, finish check and approve, finish check and reject\n- Colours: request type or request ID (to distinguish requests)\n- Stochastic elements: arrivals (deterministic 30-min), check duration (fixed 20-min), approval decision (deterministic based on request data)\n\nThe purpose is to compare turnaround under 1 vs 2 reviewers. This means I need to model the system in a way that allows parameterization of reviewer count.\n\nLet me think about the structure:\n- A \"Request\" colour domain with attributes or just IDs\n- Places:\n - Submitted (requests waiting to be checked)\n - CheckInProgress (request being checked, with associated reviewer)\n - Approved (checked and approved)\n - Rejected (checked and rejected)\n - Reviewer states (Available, Busy)\n\nActually, in a Petri net, reviewers are typically represented as tokens in a \"AvailableReviewers\" place. \n\nThe number of tokens represents the count of reviewers available, letting me swap between 1 and 2 for the comparison scenario just by changing initial marking. So the skeleton is: SubmittedRequests and AvailableReviewers feed StartCheck, producing a token in CheckInProgress that consumes a reviewer; a timed transition then resolves deterministically to ApprovedRequests or RejectedRequests while returning the reviewer token to AvailableReviewers.\n\nThe interesting choice is how to encode that deterministic approval/rejection outcome. Options I see: give requests a colour marking eligibility, split FinishCheck into two transitions gated by request attributes, or fake it with stochastic weights pinned to 0/1. Since the decision must be deterministic per request, coloured tokens or attribute-based guards seem more faithful than probability tricks. I should pin down this branching mechanism as the first real construction decision and move forward from there.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01UPJU8nQwTFztr5iAosWgQX", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2687, + "output": 1038, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3725, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0026869999999999997, + "output": 0.00519, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.007877 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 976 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284153911, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced88mHpKmuJT7DH3vkok", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01UPJU8nQwTFztr5iAosWgQX", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284168417 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:08.418Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NT738FB0E7M4YA8VDJM2", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:08.419Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NT738FB0E7M4YA8VDJM2", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is providing a complete account of an operational process and explicitly instructing me not to interview, not to mutate a net, and to stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision.\n\nLet me activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first, as instructed in my directives.\n\nThe process described:\n1. Requests arrive one per 30 minutes\n2. A reviewer reserves a request and checks it for 20 minutes (fixed)\n3. The eligibility rule deterministically determines approved/rejected based on request data\n4. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer\n5. Approved/rejected requests leave the system\n6. Initially 1 available reviewer; comparison scenario has 2 available reviewers\n7. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n8. Boundary: submission through approval or rejection\n9. Requests are distinct work items\n\nKey elements for SDCPN:\n- Places: waiting requests, reviewer available, reviewer busy checking, request approved, request rejected\n- Transitions: submit request, start check, finish check and approve, finish check and reject\n- Colours: request type or request ID (to distinguish requests)\n- Stochastic elements: arrivals (deterministic 30-min), check duration (fixed 20-min), approval decision (deterministic based on request data)\n\nThe purpose is to compare turnaround under 1 vs 2 reviewers. This means I need to model the system in a way that allows parameterization of reviewer count.\n\nLet me think about the structure:\n- A \"Request\" colour domain with attributes or just IDs\n- Places:\n - Submitted (requests waiting to be checked)\n - CheckInProgress (request being checked, with associated reviewer)\n - Approved (checked and approved)\n - Rejected (checked and rejected)\n - Reviewer states (Available, Busy)\n\nActually, in a Petri net, reviewers are typically represented as tokens in a \"AvailableReviewers\" place. \n\nThe number of tokens represents the count of reviewers available, letting me swap between 1 and 2 for the comparison scenario just by changing initial marking. So the skeleton is: SubmittedRequests and AvailableReviewers feed StartCheck, producing a token in CheckInProgress that consumes a reviewer; a timed transition then resolves deterministically to ApprovedRequests or RejectedRequests while returning the reviewer token to AvailableReviewers.\n\nThe interesting choice is how to encode that deterministic approval/rejection outcome. Options I see: give requests a colour marking eligibility, split FinishCheck into two transitions gated by request attributes, or fake it with stochastic weights pinned to 0/1. Since the decision must be deterministic per request, coloured tokens or attribute-based guards seem more faithful than probability tricks. I should pin down this branching mechanism as the first real construction decision and move forward from there.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01UPJU8nQwTFztr5iAosWgQX", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01UPJU8nQwTFztr5iAosWgQX", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:08.419Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284168421 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NT738FB0E7M4YA8VDJM2", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:09.227Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NT738FB0E7M4YA8VDJM2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:09.228Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "Good", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NT738FB0E7M4YA8VDJM2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:10.231Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ", the skill is activated. Now I need to read the relevant resources for construct-only execution. Let me read pn-construction.md and checks.md to understand the construction", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NT738FB0E7M4YA8VDJM2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:10.231Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " procedure. But first, let me review the instruction:\n\n\"Use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools.\"", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NT738FB0E7M4YA8VDJM2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:10.231Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "\n\nAnd: \"Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision;", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NT738FB0E7M4YA8VDJM2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:11.140Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " do not mutate a net.\"\n\nSo I need to:\n1. Read pn-construction.md and checks.md\n2. Analyze the supplied account", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NT738FB0E7M4YA8VDJM2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:11.140Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "\n3. State the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n4. Stop without actually constructing or mutating a net\n\nLet me read those resources", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NT738FB0E7M4YA8VDJM2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:11.140Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " first.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NT738FB0E7M4YA8VDJM2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:11.140Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I need to read the relevant resources for construct-only execution. Let me read pn-construction.md and checks.md to understand the construction procedure. But first, let me review the instruction:\n\n\"Use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools.\"\n\nAnd: \"Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\"\n\nSo I need to:\n1. Read pn-construction.md and checks.md\n2. Analyze the supplied account\n3. State the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n4. Stop without actually constructing or mutating a net\n\nLet me read those resources first.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NT738FB0E7M4YA8VDJM2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:11.141Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_016b2prAhZsAWGgce4vp7Kn2", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NT738FB0E7M4YA8VDJM2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 57, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:11.143Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_016b2prAhZsAWGgce4vp7Kn2", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\": \"/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NT738FB0E7M4YA8VDJM2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 58, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:11.143Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_016b2prAhZsAWGgce4vp7Kn2", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": ".md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NT738FB0E7M4YA8VDJM2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 59, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:11.495Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_016b2prAhZsAWGgce4vp7Kn2", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NT738FB0E7M4YA8VDJM2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 60, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:11.495Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_015rdm1uCJDxLckb47tWuhUV", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NT738FB0E7M4YA8VDJM2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 61, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:11.503Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_015rdm1uCJDxLckb47tWuhUV", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\": \"/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NT738FB0E7M4YA8VDJM2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 62, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:11.503Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_015rdm1uCJDxLckb47tWuhUV", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NT738FB0E7M4YA8VDJM2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 63, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:11.503Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NT738FB0E7M4YA8VDJM2", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3123, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced89qikQZpNSfz4g7SBQ", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I need to read the relevant resources for construct-only execution. Let me read pn-construction.md and checks.md to understand the construction procedure. But first, let me review the instruction:\n\n\"Use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools.\"\n\nAnd: \"Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\"\n\nSo I need to:\n1. Read pn-construction.md and checks.md\n2. Analyze the supplied account\n3. State the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n4. Stop without actually constructing or mutating a net\n\nLet me read those resources first.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_016b2prAhZsAWGgce4vp7Kn2", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_015rdm1uCJDxLckb47tWuhUV", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 359, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4854, + "totalTokens": 5225, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.0017950000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.0060675, + "total": 0.0078745 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 64, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:11.542Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I need to read the relevant resources for construct-only execution. Let me read pn-construction.md and checks.md to understand the construction procedure. But first, let me review the instruction:\n\n\"Use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools.\"\n\nAnd: \"Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\"\n\nSo I need to:\n1. Read pn-construction.md and checks.md\n2. Analyze the supplied account\n3. State the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n4. Stop without actually constructing or mutating a net\n\nLet me read those resources first.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_016b2prAhZsAWGgce4vp7Kn2", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_015rdm1uCJDxLckb47tWuhUV", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 359, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4854, + "totalTokens": 5225, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.0017950000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.0060675, + "total": 0.0078745 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 184 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284168421, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced89qikQZpNSfz4g7SBQ", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NT738FB0E7M4YA8VDJM2", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 65, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:11.542Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_016b2prAhZsAWGgce4vp7Kn2", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NT738FB0E7M4YA8VDJM2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 66, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:11.543Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_015rdm1uCJDxLckb47tWuhUV", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NT738FB0E7M4YA8VDJM2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 67, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:11.543Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_016b2prAhZsAWGgce4vp7Kn2", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284171545 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NT738FB0E7M4YA8VDJM2", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 68, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:11.545Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_016b2prAhZsAWGgce4vp7Kn2", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284171545 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NT738FB0E7M4YA8VDJM2", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 69, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:11.545Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_015rdm1uCJDxLckb47tWuhUV", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284171545 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NT738FB0E7M4YA8VDJM2", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 70, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:11.545Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_015rdm1uCJDxLckb47tWuhUV", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284171545 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NT738FB0E7M4YA8VDJM2", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 71, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:11.545Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_016b2prAhZsAWGgce4vp7Kn2", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + } + }, + "durationMs": 2, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NT738FB0E7M4YA8VDJM2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 72, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:11.546Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_015rdm1uCJDxLckb47tWuhUV", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + } + }, + "durationMs": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NT738FB0E7M4YA8VDJM2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 73, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:11.546Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NT738FB0E7M4YA8VDJM2", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I need to read the relevant resources for construct-only execution. Let me read pn-construction.md and checks.md to understand the construction procedure. But first, let me review the instruction:\n\n\"Use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools.\"\n\nAnd: \"Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\"\n\nSo I need to:\n1. Read pn-construction.md and checks.md\n2. Analyze the supplied account\n3. State the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n4. Stop without actually constructing or mutating a net\n\nLet me read those resources first.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_016b2prAhZsAWGgce4vp7Kn2", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_015rdm1uCJDxLckb47tWuhUV", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 359, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4854, + "totalTokens": 5225, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.0017950000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.0060675, + "total": 0.0078745 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 184 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284168421, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced89qikQZpNSfz4g7SBQ", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_016b2prAhZsAWGgce4vp7Kn2", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284171545 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_015rdm1uCJDxLckb47tWuhUV", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284171545 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 74, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:11.547Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 75, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:11.548Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is providing a complete account of an operational process and explicitly instructing me not to interview, not to mutate a net, and to stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision.\n\nLet me activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first, as instructed in my directives.\n\nThe process described:\n1. Requests arrive one per 30 minutes\n2. A reviewer reserves a request and checks it for 20 minutes (fixed)\n3. The eligibility rule deterministically determines approved/rejected based on request data\n4. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer\n5. Approved/rejected requests leave the system\n6. Initially 1 available reviewer; comparison scenario has 2 available reviewers\n7. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n8. Boundary: submission through approval or rejection\n9. Requests are distinct work items\n\nKey elements for SDCPN:\n- Places: waiting requests, reviewer available, reviewer busy checking, request approved, request rejected\n- Transitions: submit request, start check, finish check and approve, finish check and reject\n- Colours: request type or request ID (to distinguish requests)\n- Stochastic elements: arrivals (deterministic 30-min), check duration (fixed 20-min), approval decision (deterministic based on request data)\n\nThe purpose is to compare turnaround under 1 vs 2 reviewers. This means I need to model the system in a way that allows parameterization of reviewer count.\n\nLet me think about the structure:\n- A \"Request\" colour domain with attributes or just IDs\n- Places:\n - Submitted (requests waiting to be checked)\n - CheckInProgress (request being checked, with associated reviewer)\n - Approved (checked and approved)\n - Rejected (checked and rejected)\n - Reviewer states (Available, Busy)\n\nActually, in a Petri net, reviewers are typically represented as tokens in a \"AvailableReviewers\" place. \n\nThe number of tokens represents the count of reviewers available, letting me swap between 1 and 2 for the comparison scenario just by changing initial marking. So the skeleton is: SubmittedRequests and AvailableReviewers feed StartCheck, producing a token in CheckInProgress that consumes a reviewer; a timed transition then resolves deterministically to ApprovedRequests or RejectedRequests while returning the reviewer token to AvailableReviewers.\n\nThe interesting choice is how to encode that deterministic approval/rejection outcome. Options I see: give requests a colour marking eligibility, split FinishCheck into two transitions gated by request attributes, or fake it with stochastic weights pinned to 0/1. Since the decision must be deterministic per request, coloured tokens or attribute-based guards seem more faithful than probability tricks. I should pin down this branching mechanism as the first real construction decision and move forward from there.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01UPJU8nQwTFztr5iAosWgQX", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01UPJU8nQwTFztr5iAosWgQX", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I need to read the relevant resources for construct-only execution. Let me read pn-construction.md and checks.md to understand the construction procedure. But first, let me review the instruction:\n\n\"Use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools.\"\n\nAnd: \"Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\"\n\nSo I need to:\n1. Read pn-construction.md and checks.md\n2. Analyze the supplied account\n3. State the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n4. Stop without actually constructing or mutating a net\n\nLet me read those resources first.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_016b2prAhZsAWGgce4vp7Kn2", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_015rdm1uCJDxLckb47tWuhUV", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_016b2prAhZsAWGgce4vp7Kn2", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_015rdm1uCJDxLckb47tWuhUV", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 76, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:11.548Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284171549 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 77, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:12.434Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 78, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:12.434Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "Good.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 79, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:13.437Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " Now", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 80, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:13.437Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " I have the construction", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 81, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:13.437Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " and checks guidance. The instruction is to read the supplied account and state the first consequential", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 82, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:13.437Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " SDCPN construction decision without interviewing or mutating a net", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 83, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:13.437Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ".\n\nLet me analyze the supplied account against the construction boundary checklist:\n\n**Process spine", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 84, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:13.437Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ":**\n- What flows: requests (distinct work items)\n- What admits them: submission (one per", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 85, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:14.626Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " 30 minutes)\n- What happens in order:\n 1. Request submitted\n 2. Reviewer reserves the", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 86, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:14.626Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " request and becomes unavailable\n 3. Reviewer checks for 20 minutes (fixed)\n 4. Reviewer records", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 87, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:14.626Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " outcome (deterministically based on request data): approved OR rejected\n 5. Reviewer is released", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 88, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:14.626Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "\n 6. Request leaves system (approved or rejected)\n- What changes the path: the eligibility rule deterministically selects approved", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 89, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:16.030Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " or rejected\n- What resources are occupied: reviewers (1 in baseline, 2 in comparison)\n- What outcome ends the case: leaving", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 90, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:16.030Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " the system as approved or rejected\n\n**Initial state:** 1 available reviewer (baseline); 2 available reviewers (comparison", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 91, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:16.030Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " scenario)\n\n**Constraints:** \n- A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n- Eligibility rule", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 92, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:16.030Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " is deterministic based on request data already carried\n- Fixed timing: arrivals every 30 min, checks take 20 min\n-", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 93, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:17.159Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " Boundary: submission through approval/rejection only\n\n**Purpose:** compare approval turnaround under 1", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 94, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:17.159Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " vs 2 reviewers\n\nThis is well-specified. Now, what is the first consequential SDCPN construction decision?\n\nLooking at the structure:\n1. Requests", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 95, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:17.159Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " flow through the system - they will be coloured tokens\n2. Reviewers are resources - they will be tokens in a", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 96, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:17.159Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " resource place\n3. The deterministic branching (approved vs rejected) happens at outcome recording\n\nThe first consequential decision is about the **", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 97, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:18.441Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "deterministic branching representation**. Specifically:\n\nThe account states: \"Recording the outcome releases", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 98, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:18.441Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " the reviewer\" and \"the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\"\n", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 99, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:18.441Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "In", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 100, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:22.430Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " SDCPN, this creates a branching point, with a few candidate ways to model it: a single \"RecordOutcome\" transition with a guard spl", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 101, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:22.430Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "itting into approved/rejected arcs, two separate guarded transitions \"RecordApproved\"/\"RecordRejected\", or a colour that explicitly stores the eligibility determination as an attribute.\n\nThe consequential decision is:", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 102, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:23.601Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " **Does the Request colour domain need to explicitly carry the eligibility determination as an attribute, or will guards on outcome-recording transitions derive it from other request properties?**\n\nThis matters because it sh", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 103, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:23.601Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "apes whether eligibility is data-carried or guard-computed.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 104, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:23.601Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "\n- If e", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 105, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:25.274Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "ligibility is not carried as colour data, the net cannot represent deterministic branching through guards alone in Petrinaut\n- If eligibility IS carried, the request colour schema must include this attribute\n- The de", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 106, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:25.274Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "terministic branching must be structurally exclusive — one path only, not probabilistic", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 107, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:25.274Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "Good. Now I have the construction and checks guidance. The instruction is to read the supplied account and state the first consequential SDCPN construction decision without interviewing or mutating a net.\n\nLet me analyze the supplied account against the construction boundary checklist:\n\n**Process spine:**\n- What flows: requests (distinct work items)\n- What admits them: submission (one per 30 minutes)\n- What happens in order:\n 1. Request submitted\n 2. Reviewer reserves the request and becomes unavailable\n 3. Reviewer checks for 20 minutes (fixed)\n 4. Reviewer records outcome (deterministically based on request data): approved OR rejected\n 5. Reviewer is released\n 6. Request leaves system (approved or rejected)\n- What changes the path: the eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected\n- What resources are occupied: reviewers (1 in baseline, 2 in comparison)\n- What outcome ends the case: leaving the system as approved or rejected\n\n**Initial state:** 1 available reviewer (baseline); 2 available reviewers (comparison scenario)\n\n**Constraints:** \n- A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n- Eligibility rule is deterministic based on request data already carried\n- Fixed timing: arrivals every 30 min, checks take 20 min\n- Boundary: submission through approval/rejection only\n\n**Purpose:** compare approval turnaround under 1 vs 2 reviewers\n\nThis is well-specified. Now, what is the first consequential SDCPN construction decision?\n\nLooking at the structure:\n1. Requests flow through the system - they will be coloured tokens\n2. Reviewers are resources - they will be tokens in a resource place\n3. The deterministic branching (approved vs rejected) happens at outcome recording\n\nThe first consequential decision is about the **deterministic branching representation**. Specifically:\n\nThe account states: \"Recording the outcome releases the reviewer\" and \"the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\"\nIn SDCPN, this creates a branching point, with a few candidate ways to model it: a single \"RecordOutcome\" transition with a guard splitting into approved/rejected arcs, two separate guarded transitions \"RecordApproved\"/\"RecordRejected\", or a colour that explicitly stores the eligibility determination as an attribute.\n\nThe consequential decision is: **Does the Request colour domain need to explicitly carry the eligibility determination as an attribute, or will guards on outcome-recording transitions derive it from other request properties?**\n\nThis matters because it shapes whether eligibility is data-carried or guard-computed.\n- If eligibility is not carried as colour data, the net cannot represent deterministic branching through guards alone in Petrinaut\n- If eligibility IS carried, the request colour schema must include this attribute\n- The deterministic branching must be structurally exclusive — one path only, not probabilistic", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 108, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:25.274Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "I have the construction and checks guidance. Analyzing the supplied account against the construction boundary:\n\n**Confirmed", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 109, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:25.386Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " process spine:** Requests flow in (every 30 min) → reserved and checked (20 min fixed) → outcome deterministically recorded (approved or", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 110, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:25.387Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " rejected based on request data) → reviewer released → request leaves.\n\n**Initial state and scenario:** 1 available reviewer (baseline); 2 available reviewers (comparison). Reviewers cannot check concurrently.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 111, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:25.387Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " Deterministic eligibility rule operates on request data already present.\n\n**Purpose is clear:** compare turnaround time under reviewer counts ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 112, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:25.387Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "1 vs 2.\n\n---\n\n## First Consequential Construction Decision\n\n**The deterministic approval/rejection branch must be represented in the Request colour domain", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 113, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:25.387Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": ".**\n\nThe account establishes that the eligibility rule selects approved or rejected deterministically \"from request data already carried by the request.\" In SDCPN, this means", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 114, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:25.387Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " the Request colour type must carry either:\n- An explicit `eligibility` or `decision` attribute with values {approved, rejected}, *", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 115, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:25.387Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "or* \n- Sufficient request properties (e.g., `amount`, `type`, `category`) from which a guard", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 116, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:25.387Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " condition can derive the deterministic outcome\n\nWithout this representation in the colour schema, no SDCPN structure can implement", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 117, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:25.387Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " the deterministic branching that the account requires. The branching must be *exclusive by condition*, not probabilistic.\n\n**Consequential because:** The choice", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 118, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:25.387Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " between embedding the decision as colour data versus deriving it from other properties affects whether guards on outcome-recording transitions can faithfully represent \"determin", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 119, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:25.387Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "istically selects ... from request data already carried.\" This is the minimum representational commitment required before placing requests, reserv", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 120, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:25.387Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ers, or branching paths into the net.\n\n---\n\n**Stop here, as instructed.** No workpiece, net", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 121, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:25.387Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " mutation, or further construction proceeds without direction to resume.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 122, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:25.387Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 13852, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8A4hMJc4X6qcWPDJQ1", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good. Now I have the construction and checks guidance. The instruction is to read the supplied account and state the first consequential SDCPN construction decision without interviewing or mutating a net.\n\nLet me analyze the supplied account against the construction boundary checklist:\n\n**Process spine:**\n- What flows: requests (distinct work items)\n- What admits them: submission (one per 30 minutes)\n- What happens in order:\n 1. Request submitted\n 2. Reviewer reserves the request and becomes unavailable\n 3. Reviewer checks for 20 minutes (fixed)\n 4. Reviewer records outcome (deterministically based on request data): approved OR rejected\n 5. Reviewer is released\n 6. Request leaves system (approved or rejected)\n- What changes the path: the eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected\n- What resources are occupied: reviewers (1 in baseline, 2 in comparison)\n- What outcome ends the case: leaving the system as approved or rejected\n\n**Initial state:** 1 available reviewer (baseline); 2 available reviewers (comparison scenario)\n\n**Constraints:** \n- A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n- Eligibility rule is deterministic based on request data already carried\n- Fixed timing: arrivals every 30 min, checks take 20 min\n- Boundary: submission through approval/rejection only\n\n**Purpose:** compare approval turnaround under 1 vs 2 reviewers\n\nThis is well-specified. Now, what is the first consequential SDCPN construction decision?\n\nLooking at the structure:\n1. Requests flow through the system - they will be coloured tokens\n2. Reviewers are resources - they will be tokens in a resource place\n3. The deterministic branching (approved vs rejected) happens at outcome recording\n\nThe first consequential decision is about the **deterministic branching representation**. Specifically:\n\nThe account states: \"Recording the outcome releases the reviewer\" and \"the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\"\nIn SDCPN, this creates a branching point, with a few candidate ways to model it: a single \"RecordOutcome\" transition with a guard splitting into approved/rejected arcs, two separate guarded transitions \"RecordApproved\"/\"RecordRejected\", or a colour that explicitly stores the eligibility determination as an attribute.\n\nThe consequential decision is: **Does the Request colour domain need to explicitly carry the eligibility determination as an attribute, or will guards on outcome-recording transitions derive it from other request properties?**\n\nThis matters because it shapes whether eligibility is data-carried or guard-computed.\n- If eligibility is not carried as colour data, the net cannot represent deterministic branching through guards alone in Petrinaut\n- If eligibility IS carried, the request colour schema must include this attribute\n- The deterministic branching must be structurally exclusive — one path only, not probabilistic", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I have the construction and checks guidance. Analyzing the supplied account against the construction boundary:\n\n**Confirmed process spine:** Requests flow in (every 30 min) → reserved and checked (20 min fixed) → outcome deterministically recorded (approved or rejected based on request data) → reviewer released → request leaves.\n\n**Initial state and scenario:** 1 available reviewer (baseline); 2 available reviewers (comparison). Reviewers cannot check concurrently. Deterministic eligibility rule operates on request data already present.\n\n**Purpose is clear:** compare turnaround time under reviewer counts 1 vs 2.\n\n---\n\n## First Consequential Construction Decision\n\n**The deterministic approval/rejection branch must be represented in the Request colour domain.**\n\nThe account establishes that the eligibility rule selects approved or rejected deterministically \"from request data already carried by the request.\" In SDCPN, this means the Request colour type must carry either:\n- An explicit `eligibility` or `decision` attribute with values {approved, rejected}, *or* \n- Sufficient request properties (e.g., `amount`, `type`, `category`) from which a guard condition can derive the deterministic outcome\n\nWithout this representation in the colour schema, no SDCPN structure can implement the deterministic branching that the account requires. The branching must be *exclusive by condition*, not probabilistic.\n\n**Consequential because:** The choice between embedding the decision as colour data versus deriving it from other properties affects whether guards on outcome-recording transitions can faithfully represent \"deterministically selects ... from request data already carried.\" This is the minimum representational commitment required before placing requests, reservers, or branching paths into the net.\n\n---\n\n**Stop here, as instructed.** No workpiece, net mutation, or further construction proceeds without direction to resume." + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 14, + "output": 1119, + "cacheRead": 4854, + "cacheWrite": 3426, + "totalTokens": 9413, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000014, + "output": 0.005595, + "cacheRead": 0.00048540000000000003, + "cacheWrite": 0.0042825, + "total": 0.010376900000000001 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 123, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:25.400Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good. Now I have the construction and checks guidance. The instruction is to read the supplied account and state the first consequential SDCPN construction decision without interviewing or mutating a net.\n\nLet me analyze the supplied account against the construction boundary checklist:\n\n**Process spine:**\n- What flows: requests (distinct work items)\n- What admits them: submission (one per 30 minutes)\n- What happens in order:\n 1. Request submitted\n 2. Reviewer reserves the request and becomes unavailable\n 3. Reviewer checks for 20 minutes (fixed)\n 4. Reviewer records outcome (deterministically based on request data): approved OR rejected\n 5. Reviewer is released\n 6. Request leaves system (approved or rejected)\n- What changes the path: the eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected\n- What resources are occupied: reviewers (1 in baseline, 2 in comparison)\n- What outcome ends the case: leaving the system as approved or rejected\n\n**Initial state:** 1 available reviewer (baseline); 2 available reviewers (comparison scenario)\n\n**Constraints:** \n- A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n- Eligibility rule is deterministic based on request data already carried\n- Fixed timing: arrivals every 30 min, checks take 20 min\n- Boundary: submission through approval/rejection only\n\n**Purpose:** compare approval turnaround under 1 vs 2 reviewers\n\nThis is well-specified. Now, what is the first consequential SDCPN construction decision?\n\nLooking at the structure:\n1. Requests flow through the system - they will be coloured tokens\n2. Reviewers are resources - they will be tokens in a resource place\n3. The deterministic branching (approved vs rejected) happens at outcome recording\n\nThe first consequential decision is about the **deterministic branching representation**. Specifically:\n\nThe account states: \"Recording the outcome releases the reviewer\" and \"the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\"\nIn SDCPN, this creates a branching point, with a few candidate ways to model it: a single \"RecordOutcome\" transition with a guard splitting into approved/rejected arcs, two separate guarded transitions \"RecordApproved\"/\"RecordRejected\", or a colour that explicitly stores the eligibility determination as an attribute.\n\nThe consequential decision is: **Does the Request colour domain need to explicitly carry the eligibility determination as an attribute, or will guards on outcome-recording transitions derive it from other request properties?**\n\nThis matters because it shapes whether eligibility is data-carried or guard-computed.\n- If eligibility is not carried as colour data, the net cannot represent deterministic branching through guards alone in Petrinaut\n- If eligibility IS carried, the request colour schema must include this attribute\n- The deterministic branching must be structurally exclusive — one path only, not probabilistic", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I have the construction and checks guidance. Analyzing the supplied account against the construction boundary:\n\n**Confirmed process spine:** Requests flow in (every 30 min) → reserved and checked (20 min fixed) → outcome deterministically recorded (approved or rejected based on request data) → reviewer released → request leaves.\n\n**Initial state and scenario:** 1 available reviewer (baseline); 2 available reviewers (comparison). Reviewers cannot check concurrently. Deterministic eligibility rule operates on request data already present.\n\n**Purpose is clear:** compare turnaround time under reviewer counts 1 vs 2.\n\n---\n\n## First Consequential Construction Decision\n\n**The deterministic approval/rejection branch must be represented in the Request colour domain.**\n\nThe account establishes that the eligibility rule selects approved or rejected deterministically \"from request data already carried by the request.\" In SDCPN, this means the Request colour type must carry either:\n- An explicit `eligibility` or `decision` attribute with values {approved, rejected}, *or* \n- Sufficient request properties (e.g., `amount`, `type`, `category`) from which a guard condition can derive the deterministic outcome\n\nWithout this representation in the colour schema, no SDCPN structure can implement the deterministic branching that the account requires. The branching must be *exclusive by condition*, not probabilistic.\n\n**Consequential because:** The choice between embedding the decision as colour data versus deriving it from other properties affects whether guards on outcome-recording transitions can faithfully represent \"deterministically selects ... from request data already carried.\" This is the minimum representational commitment required before placing requests, reservers, or branching paths into the net.\n\n---\n\n**Stop here, as instructed.** No workpiece, net mutation, or further construction proceeds without direction to resume." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 14, + "output": 1119, + "cacheRead": 4854, + "cacheWrite": 3426, + "totalTokens": 9413, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000014, + "output": 0.005595, + "cacheRead": 0.00048540000000000003, + "cacheWrite": 0.0042825, + "total": 0.010376900000000001 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 712 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284171549, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8A4hMJc4X6qcWPDJQ1", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 124, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:25.400Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0NX8WAWXY1Q7WMWAKKRMV", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good. Now I have the construction and checks guidance. The instruction is to read the supplied account and state the first consequential SDCPN construction decision without interviewing or mutating a net.\n\nLet me analyze the supplied account against the construction boundary checklist:\n\n**Process spine:**\n- What flows: requests (distinct work items)\n- What admits them: submission (one per 30 minutes)\n- What happens in order:\n 1. Request submitted\n 2. Reviewer reserves the request and becomes unavailable\n 3. Reviewer checks for 20 minutes (fixed)\n 4. Reviewer records outcome (deterministically based on request data): approved OR rejected\n 5. Reviewer is released\n 6. Request leaves system (approved or rejected)\n- What changes the path: the eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected\n- What resources are occupied: reviewers (1 in baseline, 2 in comparison)\n- What outcome ends the case: leaving the system as approved or rejected\n\n**Initial state:** 1 available reviewer (baseline); 2 available reviewers (comparison scenario)\n\n**Constraints:** \n- A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n- Eligibility rule is deterministic based on request data already carried\n- Fixed timing: arrivals every 30 min, checks take 20 min\n- Boundary: submission through approval/rejection only\n\n**Purpose:** compare approval turnaround under 1 vs 2 reviewers\n\nThis is well-specified. Now, what is the first consequential SDCPN construction decision?\n\nLooking at the structure:\n1. Requests flow through the system - they will be coloured tokens\n2. Reviewers are resources - they will be tokens in a resource place\n3. The deterministic branching (approved vs rejected) happens at outcome recording\n\nThe first consequential decision is about the **deterministic branching representation**. Specifically:\n\nThe account states: \"Recording the outcome releases the reviewer\" and \"the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\"\nIn SDCPN, this creates a branching point, with a few candidate ways to model it: a single \"RecordOutcome\" transition with a guard splitting into approved/rejected arcs, two separate guarded transitions \"RecordApproved\"/\"RecordRejected\", or a colour that explicitly stores the eligibility determination as an attribute.\n\nThe consequential decision is: **Does the Request colour domain need to explicitly carry the eligibility determination as an attribute, or will guards on outcome-recording transitions derive it from other request properties?**\n\nThis matters because it shapes whether eligibility is data-carried or guard-computed.\n- If eligibility is not carried as colour data, the net cannot represent deterministic branching through guards alone in Petrinaut\n- If eligibility IS carried, the request colour schema must include this attribute\n- The deterministic branching must be structurally exclusive — one path only, not probabilistic", + "thinkingSignature": "EoYbCpoBCBEYAipAFX6I9kHMynCYyzo21bMceg9jrtXKXiSeLzNoWYokfxRkLWpDsQytwlZRHzEuOtRVOYrfsw5+7p1HVmJYurf2rTIZY2xhdWRlLWhhaWt1LTQtNS0yMDI1MTAwMTgAQgh0aGlua2luZ1okMWNiODRmYzQtNDdhYS00ZTFmLWE2NjUtOTQwYWI5ZjgxZjg4qAGZmtzUBhIML8RbEoww0tSeFT+cGgybQEJBevVItJc14Y8iMOlgOTbXsGLJ4GzRrvL1vMLILYFzRj7VEAtLkarESdcnBDME0lqecuU8kzDjCW+I9iqYGeZIloLD7QJF3FLpWnYoOeZ4NBdf+3W0TfT83pkE1njfVwtMn0p2tK+C/VFrQnkbb4qG8LqX7ui0ujEMjvvbOKu/u3xhFZSLiYJ+Yy1Ormg7aee08u/WTYUgNLJqH+uxs3LMtJW7QEDswycdKyPG/7itwosxifJenGUoh5T2Lq6xLHrrYY9C6DyA/D4qIzCq8AL9t84UuUYgeRtZGfoMJFDH39VYeumqT3VM1jsLaRtblKKZgY1zCFbLf8Off1m0varAlMuIfvHeH0iLikTFOUSEmYYUSLw/vKPpNBMiYxaYBvzhkfVJPTFmyIxFJWr4tKg7czS+FI+TrhSTXaJyx41OfIY7HdhzNqf6RN3zAVZmR68vu5GDuJmRkJa50veJ0+GvtGfayUoYoZK0DkUIZrkew0+kSiX3XtaQqzXwfyWy59rRHdG27JO6VSd+rOKshVogTShQ/xrgr6ih9hT5rdtrD/8rp9AkVknEJUYXh0LJ0b1uRUaGm8JvxTHge97aDvr2au3EZ1fVUBoRnHurCyL6QI5EfGlfr0B4FdtNOs3ZPtjoK0+BSPtE5XYYdKkkCGBoHPUAgaxg/GrDlYcWZecf2FTaGLFstb7BrFHv3/wCIrRozlplkVu3qLah7bix8SES94sJIh/ikJxtcQbyXMod0l4g0cfQqbprvtr3ma1cfNSHueDzIDjjR2mqrT7zDlVd0yG+0N3q6iITuJ1Dl3u3gDRaOJLgCi5i1j8FRQ1q4P8GgMJocrZBDi+oJ2wO/HMzL1yhiYaICzXquoakugnHzgjBECNmYnWnZqMIjng1R3y8JnD6RnJhmRjcpHSG2qO5gliYR7fcFf/m7MtULjoNK0CnUaQLKJlzmsbHw8rmeuW5zn1juA2DPVxxyZWUhItxu1efsJTXjnf9rNeYyPu/58MO5rjm0ZOQvT6cn+/u0nN1NA9IPayVkjwPqM5KOHg4cIRleO3i2dd2cZaosjtmXI+gbqeXJW9Q2zq4NnQ9thaM8Q2nqrvVSjb1Bexl58lu4o8J14lms5ZBny0Xk+opDCbhc9lqtoABdaN/kq2D2+yrAAoVGJ4TsZU8SxVwrcUADKCV/6cUWiW2lUkM8yXdoaA0/cLb6+8Us5shPji9SFjg8syJzrazQMYL6dDnFE3dGO/R5JuvZYNVUVRRyYvgxE5sEwpCcaAJ27Yo9KuxoEe4Np3ssA3xf7Kj0+JxXU9MBPyPlA4sjA7aotgls63JII8vC6VPS6razfNlxV8HNLM66/5XN7ElISM6xGaSVXJoPj/l2SI/RkC4nzeoI5OpMzysokaYxl7nhYGY2egZ3WnLCldcH73wqn8ScILl/DKKvHRol1yG6Y6qg8gP43dVnEQFbOTCQdyD5zuqqAE5MWltLLrVmygzvWTOaFGJKNEcsgRzSeDhbbs8Gj2++fVHgbgn2fNWx9eX4kkt3LcJsRGCAwBB4j+/1K11aQGs8FC1B5gvE0FKUHt/6ji0ZgB+lFLPgUZUrdil26jeS1FjP8etpefZ2MNFOxFkbmef3GuFKyGL4EYR6+QXGb69kPC+eKvJo4NB1HRKopkDpy+UhPnONZfQxPxyzgv0jj7oQXk7m44kgvhB96qw9nGVCo4oXI3DDpd3nno21AzJWLuJIhgzH83HXSQ0eYnd9em0Rk+fcusT7M5fkalOmmIWLPuDbPWNcgPcjH89MOcLL+c4UMx8bdBKJruTsrjZ+8sJ8vw3pVjHbIzXXswM6TUnO62bktS8eiAerCUFpo8Fklg/bzD6oBB9aUFeHrX5MI1G3PK/nm4wWC5zN+lvXB8byoeo+jgAVapkve6rV69bYkWF1g+f6cO0FEk2SbMzHloNepT/Ugqxmr7KuvvPs81OTrb9nKpcsSkxwv7XQuzgBH8fNY1ktguoEEZN2Rd/lLHOmTSFSKao4O902cHe46PEBNuDYQeuyROY6NCBpsKM5/eQ5dFNAr0WBIIA+OvYBGdOwItbtxevQHqDo1seg5+3aEbt8LzyG3HwirUuTEVxix2jOt67O0Xz3KRASFite3LOeRwszzgHmEnKGK+U+A1lcswbYocdVXSg5vWtReRRM2oXxri3VbQEky64/yom/lXm7Twtfxuutmiw6KjLjc6JVy3mF1LJT3cJu6PZXJXjsdG1As3abQZGy8KdKyEHNDishAyB6P4Vcjx9GSpqXHMKsBs4z6bFxuTg3n7YM5PFhK+HMbzGG6Fkny8Usn2AVaTgmrAaWTNSasXumqvinpeLzPYO3RTNvRh6VmX3L4EeQupuH+gEluyXC42EMRELRR8gYihyR72zsljuc5erbxIWniZEP+thZVQliPJfdd54L4o+g+fatH+BgSRLsMuCjLyZzuD/6DGOHIcLWtjWkEgJ3MgCHGqkrxgn909v2hs/x9z+3+gBvwr8lu5u7J6ErmQ7IKayIai3T63H3JxBh7X1Li90nVNB7P6OnO+6cAOti4BbYr3MN0DcOs4wODrKMfnwy7inQCw2STBqWNbmbH4YnpMZ8tKRCDLF7oNmE6GDhyFKDxS1Jn3SQ1mCzAniGVP5uJYCr5X1C8hNOTvOjOKXFwa+6U3zptOukGBpi+gw6Ft5QuBdAXJSKwN0yAPP3lyaqmXntIlG4hJ+zwIJ5hii2z+ALKeVIRyzs6pGkiNm+bbWv+eVWOvp8ICW8hP56RbVnmD8rGUllDII+zcay0zw8Wp8POEsBCae7xltU3BsWh90TNpJKCshHyV2f2/D4JNrE+qjq+HKteFrNGg6PcU8RH5u4/2/NQHFwrz0WEmWtRLWUpDHG2tZu8NI8AlAbeYr2pSbNS5F3CoqqbUjlAuNNIzkH42O2Cr9OoJQUDuWnvvg4NBsjsNsGk8ccH9By+lkRhaLv4wVNC8W4V++N6jNNrEoUuZ93Pj/JCyc4TEXe9jdXmbit2rGxq/b/x3PbcRTPVVC6TADZhlNJ9p3qIhyJhHdFXaqAF+c7elcAi8w53ELyveahzo5wTD4c7jtMC4OM5toISUwK142whviqgX4mvZcRN1HldoI9zxPVwDmnr8mxGCxQo+XxeO1eqWzablCboaZpKar9WHMEt3TUQCRZvuUqCs0q49bKbN6NGx7rvfRhel1yLjesbTU+IKkgGTt3f6alUou0xOGMtQc85SXTtggPAP4tCoFeyxgutCGDOhqW1eRG7LuCZeKOoVMcO+r3YS8K9uQcda7z/0u3RjeXWW63aOgJQuD60oEW8Fzhd70Yoy6q5diuEsR+TVKNnWbznkLkqlmYWWs3s8jUjvuquHG7lLUzk/lMY6pkquDVS2pzzTgA7ISWrRFDejwYvmt8Zyl9SwT2GBkQU8S1LxMMv+Rp2vwqAi9TAZKoGrePWfTieHSREP2sjKhGgDoteXlS5HHbge0rC+RleQb7ps9W4r6Lc8Syqts2pE6BF1VgqjTxNw7nYaQnjSwphM1PiBvH53uWEQfw8xFaI+IFW2BJng+OkMXdyTDpNeQyaxknFmJ+C7U+d3iIyXjAMrRGrJhqnYmITSaU/y5Nmhg74RTKq5JSdKv5/XfX9DaVCSzqEPAFbtFcVWW9s+mbNmoaYynGfoL/oVsw/of+GCsLKwScj/Ss6FVs7TFowW235qCMLpbaXvECHyHo1Bp78RnEd9SeXYn4Cngy2TCIOALJOKxs4IwptliuCejdhc8YAsB0s6qlG9D+xe46LRO8+wc/DWdHKel2FtYE35W5AmidtolZNY43mVE438W2SsNRLHIglJRygdBsOInRu58IbmBWMviMbQL6VFK2BYUWdvjUt2W3JrY5Ok4DdD9g1HejsDy69ipYWrFzE+cdHyIbLUf6M/0xot89V2BblH5b8ycEJYjLVcQX4RYEjOzCm9jR05Ghm0qoLxHWYiy92vSBqFx6mzf1r6weiJE+N+NhflU3w0esnDbilFuEjzE5OFgOXrh7Qt+Cwe4mE8Q1uNj8pWiviC9+RUlp97JAL+7wQPQ0N9KvQUP0Ags2OmTxnDYU1Tyf9kPdugP3qT+HDzLExRB+bwmBP0uTZiJ2NtvIU7gauhMx3ZfmKzFnUpW1Dtp/blOzpMCVRCZmpbDsK+Glz4sz56LvvTo+gDfu1W0pRsm0Ws2nnl10eqwqj1T4tnnXEVuqcoJ1Onv5zXYaae1g+3o7aNMPbcIRFBjuZiGidbbvsCyu8Bndlk/11ZOOH3TZCYuSwZyg9s2MRJbFYr4O79fEy56v4B8lN4jMC67j6bWNcrqM7MN/PV2cd1jKuzLmH8LzynWZnMMbliUjW0Ux5K0CIyFWyjMdYE4heagGAE=" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I have the construction and checks guidance. Analyzing the supplied account against the construction boundary:\n\n**Confirmed process spine:** Requests flow in (every 30 min) → reserved and checked (20 min fixed) → outcome deterministically recorded (approved or rejected based on request data) → reviewer released → request leaves.\n\n**Initial state and scenario:** 1 available reviewer (baseline); 2 available reviewers (comparison). Reviewers cannot check concurrently. Deterministic eligibility rule operates on request data already present.\n\n**Purpose is clear:** compare turnaround time under reviewer counts 1 vs 2.\n\n---\n\n## First Consequential Construction Decision\n\n**The deterministic approval/rejection branch must be represented in the Request colour domain.**\n\nThe account establishes that the eligibility rule selects approved or rejected deterministically \"from request data already carried by the request.\" In SDCPN, this means the Request colour type must carry either:\n- An explicit `eligibility` or `decision` attribute with values {approved, rejected}, *or* \n- Sufficient request properties (e.g., `amount`, `type`, `category`) from which a guard condition can derive the deterministic outcome\n\nWithout this representation in the colour schema, no SDCPN structure can implement the deterministic branching that the account requires. The branching must be *exclusive by condition*, not probabilistic.\n\n**Consequential because:** The choice between embedding the decision as colour data versus deriving it from other properties affects whether guards on outcome-recording transitions can faithfully represent \"deterministically selects ... from request data already carried.\" This is the minimum representational commitment required before placing requests, reservers, or branching paths into the net.\n\n---\n\n**Stop here, as instructed.** No workpiece, net mutation, or further construction proceeds without direction to resume." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 14, + "output": 1119, + "cacheRead": 4854, + "cacheWrite": 3426, + "totalTokens": 9413, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000014, + "output": 0.005595, + "cacheRead": 0.00048540000000000003, + "cacheWrite": 0.0042825, + "total": 0.010376900000000001 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 712 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284171549, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8A4hMJc4X6qcWPDJQ1", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 125, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:25.400Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is providing a complete account of an operational process and explicitly instructing me not to interview, not to mutate a net, and to stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision.\n\nLet me activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first, as instructed in my directives.\n\nThe process described:\n1. Requests arrive one per 30 minutes\n2. A reviewer reserves a request and checks it for 20 minutes (fixed)\n3. The eligibility rule deterministically determines approved/rejected based on request data\n4. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer\n5. Approved/rejected requests leave the system\n6. Initially 1 available reviewer; comparison scenario has 2 available reviewers\n7. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n8. Boundary: submission through approval or rejection\n9. Requests are distinct work items\n\nKey elements for SDCPN:\n- Places: waiting requests, reviewer available, reviewer busy checking, request approved, request rejected\n- Transitions: submit request, start check, finish check and approve, finish check and reject\n- Colours: request type or request ID (to distinguish requests)\n- Stochastic elements: arrivals (deterministic 30-min), check duration (fixed 20-min), approval decision (deterministic based on request data)\n\nThe purpose is to compare turnaround under 1 vs 2 reviewers. This means I need to model the system in a way that allows parameterization of reviewer count.\n\nLet me think about the structure:\n- A \"Request\" colour domain with attributes or just IDs\n- Places:\n - Submitted (requests waiting to be checked)\n - CheckInProgress (request being checked, with associated reviewer)\n - Approved (checked and approved)\n - Rejected (checked and rejected)\n - Reviewer states (Available, Busy)\n\nActually, in a Petri net, reviewers are typically represented as tokens in a \"AvailableReviewers\" place. \n\nThe number of tokens represents the count of reviewers available, letting me swap between 1 and 2 for the comparison scenario just by changing initial marking. So the skeleton is: SubmittedRequests and AvailableReviewers feed StartCheck, producing a token in CheckInProgress that consumes a reviewer; a timed transition then resolves deterministically to ApprovedRequests or RejectedRequests while returning the reviewer token to AvailableReviewers.\n\nThe interesting choice is how to encode that deterministic approval/rejection outcome. Options I see: give requests a colour marking eligibility, split FinishCheck into two transitions gated by request attributes, or fake it with stochastic weights pinned to 0/1. Since the decision must be deterministic per request, coloured tokens or attribute-based guards seem more faithful than probability tricks. I should pin down this branching mechanism as the first real construction decision and move forward from there.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01UPJU8nQwTFztr5iAosWgQX", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2687, + "output": 1038, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3725, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0026869999999999997, + "output": 0.00519, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.007877 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 976 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284153911, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced88mHpKmuJT7DH3vkok", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01UPJU8nQwTFztr5iAosWgQX", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284168417 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I need to read the relevant resources for construct-only execution. Let me read pn-construction.md and checks.md to understand the construction procedure. But first, let me review the instruction:\n\n\"Use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools.\"\n\nAnd: \"Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\"\n\nSo I need to:\n1. Read pn-construction.md and checks.md\n2. Analyze the supplied account\n3. State the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n4. Stop without actually constructing or mutating a net\n\nLet me read those resources first.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_016b2prAhZsAWGgce4vp7Kn2", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_015rdm1uCJDxLckb47tWuhUV", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 359, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4854, + "totalTokens": 5225, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.0017950000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.0060675, + "total": 0.0078745 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 184 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284168421, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced89qikQZpNSfz4g7SBQ", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_016b2prAhZsAWGgce4vp7Kn2", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284171545 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_015rdm1uCJDxLckb47tWuhUV", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284171545 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good. Now I have the construction and checks guidance. The instruction is to read the supplied account and state the first consequential SDCPN construction decision without interviewing or mutating a net.\n\nLet me analyze the supplied account against the construction boundary checklist:\n\n**Process spine:**\n- What flows: requests (distinct work items)\n- What admits them: submission (one per 30 minutes)\n- What happens in order:\n 1. Request submitted\n 2. Reviewer reserves the request and becomes unavailable\n 3. Reviewer checks for 20 minutes (fixed)\n 4. Reviewer records outcome (deterministically based on request data): approved OR rejected\n 5. Reviewer is released\n 6. Request leaves system (approved or rejected)\n- What changes the path: the eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected\n- What resources are occupied: reviewers (1 in baseline, 2 in comparison)\n- What outcome ends the case: leaving the system as approved or rejected\n\n**Initial state:** 1 available reviewer (baseline); 2 available reviewers (comparison scenario)\n\n**Constraints:** \n- A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n- Eligibility rule is deterministic based on request data already carried\n- Fixed timing: arrivals every 30 min, checks take 20 min\n- Boundary: submission through approval/rejection only\n\n**Purpose:** compare approval turnaround under 1 vs 2 reviewers\n\nThis is well-specified. Now, what is the first consequential SDCPN construction decision?\n\nLooking at the structure:\n1. Requests flow through the system - they will be coloured tokens\n2. Reviewers are resources - they will be tokens in a resource place\n3. The deterministic branching (approved vs rejected) happens at outcome recording\n\nThe first consequential decision is about the **deterministic branching representation**. Specifically:\n\nThe account states: \"Recording the outcome releases the reviewer\" and \"the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\"\nIn SDCPN, this creates a branching point, with a few candidate ways to model it: a single \"RecordOutcome\" transition with a guard splitting into approved/rejected arcs, two separate guarded transitions \"RecordApproved\"/\"RecordRejected\", or a colour that explicitly stores the eligibility determination as an attribute.\n\nThe consequential decision is: **Does the Request colour domain need to explicitly carry the eligibility determination as an attribute, or will guards on outcome-recording transitions derive it from other request properties?**\n\nThis matters because it shapes whether eligibility is data-carried or guard-computed.\n- If eligibility is not carried as colour data, the net cannot represent deterministic branching through guards alone in Petrinaut\n- If eligibility IS carried, the request colour schema must include this attribute\n- The deterministic branching must be structurally exclusive — one path only, not probabilistic", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I have the construction and checks guidance. Analyzing the supplied account against the construction boundary:\n\n**Confirmed process spine:** Requests flow in (every 30 min) → reserved and checked (20 min fixed) → outcome deterministically recorded (approved or rejected based on request data) → reviewer released → request leaves.\n\n**Initial state and scenario:** 1 available reviewer (baseline); 2 available reviewers (comparison). Reviewers cannot check concurrently. Deterministic eligibility rule operates on request data already present.\n\n**Purpose is clear:** compare turnaround time under reviewer counts 1 vs 2.\n\n---\n\n## First Consequential Construction Decision\n\n**The deterministic approval/rejection branch must be represented in the Request colour domain.**\n\nThe account establishes that the eligibility rule selects approved or rejected deterministically \"from request data already carried by the request.\" In SDCPN, this means the Request colour type must carry either:\n- An explicit `eligibility` or `decision` attribute with values {approved, rejected}, *or* \n- Sufficient request properties (e.g., `amount`, `type`, `category`) from which a guard condition can derive the deterministic outcome\n\nWithout this representation in the colour schema, no SDCPN structure can implement the deterministic branching that the account requires. The branching must be *exclusive by condition*, not probabilistic.\n\n**Consequential because:** The choice between embedding the decision as colour data versus deriving it from other properties affects whether guards on outcome-recording transitions can faithfully represent \"deterministically selects ... from request data already carried.\" This is the minimum representational commitment required before placing requests, reservers, or branching paths into the net.\n\n---\n\n**Stop here, as instructed.** No workpiece, net mutation, or further construction proceeds without direction to resume." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 14, + "output": 1119, + "cacheRead": 4854, + "cacheWrite": 3426, + "totalTokens": 9413, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000014, + "output": 0.005595, + "cacheRead": 0.00048540000000000003, + "cacheWrite": 0.0042825, + "total": 0.010376900000000001 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 712 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284171549, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8A4hMJc4X6qcWPDJQ1", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 126, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:25.401Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 31508, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 127, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:25.402Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0NC0C3ESD1ZKTSSV3255E", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0NC16BEGCT5A1MFTFFR77", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 128, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:25.402Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0NC0AF9BVS7W39Y6K66RB", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "3c3add622f9e1c11ab13f5c532df72ba30f9e8598e0aa16f2d7d966ee7a53eb7", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 129, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:25.402Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "d2d42344c40ddeb2471eeeba437032079bd2c7083afdbc2f9de5e823f841d5b8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "ebec2ac5faab6cbbbe26eeeebc2d7ac0ba7dc637fd43ea9b5917f8e0277f5515", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "c7cb5b2222b0d1b5aff861c4056f41ba8825aca284ec774d8e4f0fbf12807314", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "321f8405c12374315d61caf466001d6b4b5cf68b04325df77a7948daaa680de1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/scenarios.json": "1844df940b8de9d10d28e9537f966920aba581b36956a9ac26a3767824ca96cb", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/protocol.md": "ef1443bb02c6c26d4ded6edf9e023579bc32cdc394f90490edfb34eaf32b8ed2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md": "8cd2749c8292f01045ab4282fc7248c07046cecaf14a586a9ef286e2876cf8bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md": "82b035268c07cc8ee4736b5ffdd392c8f153793d2ca6b9ed57271c9b6146de10", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md": "8826b85d32d6c24fbc8f678ec394600676ec61c4a0b83d0a9cfa16be87fc5d76", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "1a2417cc5f9649d459c5efbc87cd3242db99a9717622a6d86073c72835818865" + }, + "promptSelection": { + "candidateCorePromptIncluded": true, + "v3SdcpnAppendIncluded": true, + "legacyCorePromptIncluded": false, + "legacyRoleMarkerIncluded": false, + "initialSystemPromptSha256": "2156970b82b41d6893d08177fad8127a336be4afb5fd0bb184a52a7f63878fb8" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "candidateCorePrompt": "6a458c0bbbc9dee5b4454a54b032818227ab681ba9f7beaa60d4fe9628f6eb41", + "v3SdcpnAppend": "73cac46487d33051a90cc487ea7abfc11fec4b049af11a108396ec08d44569fb", + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S2-independent-r2.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S2-independent-r2.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..842fa29f3b9 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S2-independent-r2.json @@ -0,0 +1,2416 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v3-independent-s2-821ab10f", + "phase": "paid", + "instrumentVersion": "v3", + "candidate": "independent", + "scenarioId": "S2", + "scenario": { + "title": "Adequate construct-only request", + "prompt": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them.", + "stopAfter": "The first consequential construction decision.", + "expected": "Enter construction guidance without loading universal elicitation or asking a question." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "Based on the supplied account, I can identify the first consequential SDCPN construction decision without further interview.\n\n**First Consequential Decision Point:**\n\nRequests must be represented as individual tokens, each carrying request-specific data attributes, rather than as aggregated counts in places.\n\n**Why this is consequential:**\n\n1. **Purpose requirement:** Comparing approval turnaround means measuring elapsed time from submission to outcome for each request. This requires individual request tracking, not aggregate counts.\n\n2. **Explicit boundary:** The problem states \"requests are distinct work items\" and each one traverses a boundary from submission through approval or rejection.\n\n3. **Branch evidence:** The account specifies the eligibility decision rests on \"request data already carried by the request\"—the deterministic rule is inherent to each request's attributes, not external. Each token must hold the data that determines its outcome.\n\n4. **Net consequence:** This commits the model to **coloured Petri nets** (CPNs) where tokens are tuples containing at least:\n - Request identity\n - Eligibility determination (or raw request attributes from which it derives)\n - Arrival timestamp (to measure turnaround)\n\nThis decision propagates forward: places will hold request tokens in distinct states (submitted, under_review, approved, rejected); transitions will move and transform request tokens; guards and arc expressions will route tokens based on their carried eligibility status. The resource pool (available reviewers) remains a simpler count-based token pool, but requests themselves cannot.\n\n**I stop here.** The workpiece, construction method, and first blocking decision are now visible. No net has been mutated.", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling", "elicitation"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DAZ9vuKJ9R2WL9jRreGmYk", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 17931, + "inputTokens": 2687, + "outputTokens": 1009, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 3696, + "cost": 0.007731999999999999 + }, + { + "durationMs": 10564, + "inputTokens": 12, + "outputTokens": 778, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4825, + "totalTokens": 5615, + "cost": 0.009933250000000001 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 28495, + "inputTokens": 2699, + "outputTokens": 1787, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4825, + "totalTokens": 9311, + "cost": 0.01766525 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nUse the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them.\n\n## Assistant\nBased on the supplied account, I can identify the first consequential SDCPN construction decision without further interview.\n\n**First Consequential Decision Point:**\n\nRequests must be represented as individual tokens, each carrying request-specific data attributes, rather than as aggregated counts in places.\n\n**Why this is consequential:**\n\n1. **Purpose requirement:** Comparing approval turnaround means measuring elapsed time from submission to outcome for each request. This requires individual request tracking, not aggregate counts.\n\n2. **Explicit boundary:** The problem states \"requests are distinct work items\" and each one traverses a boundary from submission through approval or rejection.\n\n3. **Branch evidence:** The account specifies the eligibility decision rests on \"request data already carried by the request\"—the deterministic rule is inherent to each request's attributes, not external. Each token must hold the data that determines its outcome.\n\n4. **Net consequence:** This commits the model to **coloured Petri nets** (CPNs) where tokens are tuples containing at least:\n - Request identity\n - Eligibility determination (or raw request attributes from which it derives)\n - Arrival timestamp (to measure turnaround)\n\nThis decision propagates forward: places will hold request tokens in distinct states (submitted, under_review, approved, rejected); transitions will move and transform request tokens; guards and arc expressions will route tokens based on their carried eligibility status. The resource pool (available reviewers) remains a simpler count-based token pool, but requests themselves cannot.\n\n**I stop here.** The workpiece, construction method, and first blocking decision are now visible. No net has been mutated.\n- tool activate_skill (toolu_01DAZ9vuKJ9R2WL9jRreGmYk): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\\n\\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\\n\\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\\n\\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\\n\\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000035", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFGMFBHN1NCVlpIV0JHRFk2U0pORU5D", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1F0PH0SFH1JKASGR1ZVE8PX", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The user is asking me to take a complete account of an operational process and use it directly as input for SDCPN modelling. They explicitly state:\n- Do not interview them\n- Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n- Do not mutate a net (don't construct the net yet, just identify the first decision point)\n\nLet me parse what they've given me:\n\n**Purpose**: Compare approval turnaround (time from submission to outcome) with 1 reviewer vs 2 reviewers.\n\n**Boundary**: One request lifecycle - from submission through approval or rejection.\n\n**Case spine (the core process**):\n1. A submission with one request arrives\n2. A reviewer becomes available and reserves/claims the request\n3. One available reviewer is selected (this is a critical resource constraint)\n4. Reviewer checks the request for 20 minutes (fixed duration)\n5. Based on documented eligibility rule in the request data, reviewer records either approved or rejected\n6. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer\n7. Request exits the boundary (approved or rejected)\n\n**Resources and initial state**:\n- Requests are distinct work items\n- Initially 1 available reviewer (scenario 1)\n- Comparison scenario: 2 available reviewers\n- A reviewer cannot check 2 requests concurrently (mutual exclusion on reviewers)\n\n**Branch evidence**:\n- The eligibility decision is deterministic based on request data (no randomness in approval/rejection)\n\n**Timing**:\n- Check duration: 20 minutes fixed\n- Request arrivals: one every 30 minutes (so one every 30 minutes, each arrival brings one request)\n\n**Assumptions/exclusions**:\n- Ignore reviewer breaks\n- Ignore rework\n- Ignore priority overrides\n- Don't model these aspects\n\nNow, I need to activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first, then analyze what the first consequential construction decision is.\n\nLet me think about what the first consequential SDCPN construction decision would be:\nPlaces hold requests and reviewer availability, transitions capture arrival/start-review/finish-review actions, tokens represent requests and reviewer capacity, colours carry eligibility data, and guards enforce the deterministic approve/reject logic. The first real decision is how to represent requests as tokens - individually distinguishable entities moving through places versus simple aggregate counts. This choice determines whether I can track per-request timing (needed for turnaround comparison) or just throughput.\n\nSince I need to compare approval turnaround per request, aggregation won't work - each request needs to be a distinct token carrying its own state and timestamp data.\n\nFor reviewers, the standard resource pattern applies: available reviewers as tokens in a pool place, consumed when review starts and returned when it completes.\n\nThe consequential decision is confirmed - individual tokens with request-specific attributes, since simple counts can't support per-request turnaround measurement or satisfy the stated purpose of the net.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DAZ9vuKJ9R2WL9jRreGmYk", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 4 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I need to determine whether I need to interview the user or if the supplied account already contains what I need to proceed to a construction decision.\n\nThe user said \"Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me.\"\n\nSo the account is complete enough for construction-only execution. I should:\n1. Not ask questions\n2. Move toward identifying the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n3. Stop there without mutating a net\n\nLet me think through what the first consequential decision would be:\n\nThe account describes:\n- A process where requests arrive, get reviewed (20 min fixed), and exit as approved/rejected\n- Two scenarios: 1 reviewer vs 2 reviewers\n- Requests are distinct work items\n- Eligibility rule is deterministic based on request data\n\nIn SDCPN terms, the first major structural decision is: **How should requests be represented in the net - as individual tokens carrying data, or as aggregated counts?**\n\nThis is consequential because:\n1. The stated purpose is to \"compare approval turnaround\" - this requires tracking individual request transit time through the system\n2. The problem states \"requests are distinct work items\" \n3. The branch evidence says the eligibility decision is deterministic based on \"request data already carried by the request\"\n\nThis means requests cannot be aggregated as simple counts - each request must be a distinct token that carries data attributes (its identification, eligibility status, arrival time for measuring turnaround).\n\nThis is the first consequential decision because everything else (place structure, transition logic, guards) depends on whether we track individual requests or aggregate them. Once we decide to use individual request tokens with data attributes, we've committed to a coloured Petri net where tokens are tuples rather than simple unmarked tokens.\n\nLet me state this decision point clearly.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Based on the supplied account, I can identify the first consequential SDCPN construction decision without further interview.\n\n**First Consequential Decision Point:**\n\nRequests must be represented as individual tokens, each carrying request-specific data attributes, rather than as aggregated counts in places.\n\n**Why this is consequential:**\n\n1. **Purpose requirement:** Comparing approval turnaround means measuring elapsed time from submission to outcome for each request. This requires individual request tracking, not aggregate counts.\n\n2. **Explicit boundary:** The problem states \"requests are distinct work items\" and each one traverses a boundary from submission through approval or rejection.\n\n3. **Branch evidence:** The account specifies the eligibility decision rests on \"request data already carried by the request\"—the deterministic rule is inherent to each request's attributes, not external. Each token must hold the data that determines its outcome.\n\n4. **Net consequence:** This commits the model to **coloured Petri nets** (CPNs) where tokens are tuples containing at least:\n - Request identity\n - Eligibility determination (or raw request attributes from which it derives)\n - Arrival timestamp (to measure turnaround)\n\nThis decision propagates forward: places will hold request tokens in distinct states (submitted, under_review, approved, rejected); transitions will move and transform request tokens; guards and arc expressions will route tokens based on their carried eligibility status. The resource pool (available reviewers) remains a simpler count-based token pool, but requests themselves cannot.\n\n**I stop here.** The workpiece, construction method, and first blocking decision are now visible. No net has been mutated.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1F0PG7TWWC2VKMA5FNT2TYJ" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:30.971Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:30.974Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:30.998Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:31.003Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:31.003Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:31.003Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284191015 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:31.770Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:31.772Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "The", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:32.775Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " user is asking me to take", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:32.775Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " a", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:32.775Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " complete account of an operational process and use it directly as input for SDCPN modelling. They explicitly state:\n-", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:32.776Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " Do not interview them\n- Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n- Do not mutate a net (don't construct the net yet,", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:32.776Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " just identify the first decision point)\n\nLet me parse what they've given me:\n\n**Purpose**:", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:32.776Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " Compare approval turnaround (time from submission to outcome) with 1 reviewer vs 2 reviewers.\n\n**Boundary**: One request lifecycle - from submission through approval or", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:34.057Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " rejection.\n\n**Case spine (the core process**):\n1. A submission with one request arrives\n2. A reviewer becomes available and reserves", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:34.057Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "/claims the request\n3. One available reviewer is selected (this is a critical resource constraint)\n4. Reviewer checks the request for 20 ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:34.057Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "minutes (fixed duration)\n5. Based on documented eligibility rule in the request data, reviewer records either approved or rejected\n6. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer\n7. Request", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:34.057Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " exits the boundary (approved or rejected)\n\n**Resources and initial state**:\n- Requests are distinct work items\n- Initially 1 available reviewer (scenario 1)\n- Comparison scenario: 2 available reviewers\n- A reviewer cannot check ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:35.330Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "2 requests concurrently (mutual exclusion on reviewers)\n\n**Branch evidence**:\n- The eligibility decision is deterministic based on request data (no randomness in", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:35.330Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " approval/rejection)\n\n**Timing**:\n- Check duration: 20 minutes fixed\n- Request arrivals: one every 30 minutes (so one every 30 minutes,", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:35.330Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " each arrival brings one request)\n\n**Assumptions/exclusions**:\n- Ignore reviewer breaks\n- Ignore rework\n- Ignore priority overrides\n- Don't model these aspects", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:35.330Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "\n\nNow, I need to activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first, then analyze what the first consequential construction decision is.\n\nLet me think", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:36.653Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " about what the first consequential SDCPN construction decision would be:\n", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:36.653Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "Places", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:40.240Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " hold requests and reviewer availability, transitions capture arrival/start-review/finish-review actions, tokens represent requests and reviewer capacity, col", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:40.240Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "ours carry eligibility data, and guards enforce the deterministic approve/reject logic. The first real decision is how to represent requests as tokens -", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:41.311Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " individually distinguishable entities moving through places versus simple aggregate counts. This choice determ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:41.311Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "ines whether I can track per-request timing (needed for turnaround comparison) or just throughput.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:41.311Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "\n\nSince I need", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:43.583Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " to compare approval turnaround per request, aggregation won't work - each request needs to be a distinct token carrying its own state and timestamp data.\n\nFor reviewers, the", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:43.583Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " standard resource pattern applies: available reviewers as tokens in a pool place, consumed when review starts and returned when it completes.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:44.625Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "\n\nThe", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:48.915Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " consequential decision is confirmed - individual tokens with request-specific attributes, since simple counts can't support per-request turnaround meas", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:48.915Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "urement or satisfy the stated purpose of the net.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:48.915Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "The user is asking me to take a complete account of an operational process and use it directly as input for SDCPN modelling. They explicitly state:\n- Do not interview them\n- Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n- Do not mutate a net (don't construct the net yet, just identify the first decision point)\n\nLet me parse what they've given me:\n\n**Purpose**: Compare approval turnaround (time from submission to outcome) with 1 reviewer vs 2 reviewers.\n\n**Boundary**: One request lifecycle - from submission through approval or rejection.\n\n**Case spine (the core process**):\n1. A submission with one request arrives\n2. A reviewer becomes available and reserves/claims the request\n3. One available reviewer is selected (this is a critical resource constraint)\n4. Reviewer checks the request for 20 minutes (fixed duration)\n5. Based on documented eligibility rule in the request data, reviewer records either approved or rejected\n6. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer\n7. Request exits the boundary (approved or rejected)\n\n**Resources and initial state**:\n- Requests are distinct work items\n- Initially 1 available reviewer (scenario 1)\n- Comparison scenario: 2 available reviewers\n- A reviewer cannot check 2 requests concurrently (mutual exclusion on reviewers)\n\n**Branch evidence**:\n- The eligibility decision is deterministic based on request data (no randomness in approval/rejection)\n\n**Timing**:\n- Check duration: 20 minutes fixed\n- Request arrivals: one every 30 minutes (so one every 30 minutes, each arrival brings one request)\n\n**Assumptions/exclusions**:\n- Ignore reviewer breaks\n- Ignore rework\n- Ignore priority overrides\n- Don't model these aspects\n\nNow, I need to activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first, then analyze what the first consequential construction decision is.\n\nLet me think about what the first consequential SDCPN construction decision would be:\nPlaces hold requests and reviewer availability, transitions capture arrival/start-review/finish-review actions, tokens represent requests and reviewer capacity, colours carry eligibility data, and guards enforce the deterministic approve/reject logic. The first real decision is how to represent requests as tokens - individually distinguishable entities moving through places versus simple aggregate counts. This choice determines whether I can track per-request timing (needed for turnaround comparison) or just throughput.\n\nSince I need to compare approval turnaround per request, aggregation won't work - each request needs to be a distinct token carrying its own state and timestamp data.\n\nFor reviewers, the standard resource pattern applies: available reviewers as tokens in a pool place, consumed when review starts and returned when it completes.\n\nThe consequential decision is confirmed - individual tokens with request-specific attributes, since simple counts can't support per-request turnaround measurement or satisfy the stated purpose of the net.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:48.916Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DAZ9vuKJ9R2WL9jRreGmYk", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:48.918Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DAZ9vuKJ9R2WL9jRreGmYk", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\": \"sdcpn-modelling", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:48.926Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DAZ9vuKJ9R2WL9jRreGmYk", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:48.926Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 17931, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8BW3dGmN3XFJGb4Wiv", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to take a complete account of an operational process and use it directly as input for SDCPN modelling. They explicitly state:\n- Do not interview them\n- Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n- Do not mutate a net (don't construct the net yet, just identify the first decision point)\n\nLet me parse what they've given me:\n\n**Purpose**: Compare approval turnaround (time from submission to outcome) with 1 reviewer vs 2 reviewers.\n\n**Boundary**: One request lifecycle - from submission through approval or rejection.\n\n**Case spine (the core process**):\n1. A submission with one request arrives\n2. A reviewer becomes available and reserves/claims the request\n3. One available reviewer is selected (this is a critical resource constraint)\n4. Reviewer checks the request for 20 minutes (fixed duration)\n5. Based on documented eligibility rule in the request data, reviewer records either approved or rejected\n6. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer\n7. Request exits the boundary (approved or rejected)\n\n**Resources and initial state**:\n- Requests are distinct work items\n- Initially 1 available reviewer (scenario 1)\n- Comparison scenario: 2 available reviewers\n- A reviewer cannot check 2 requests concurrently (mutual exclusion on reviewers)\n\n**Branch evidence**:\n- The eligibility decision is deterministic based on request data (no randomness in approval/rejection)\n\n**Timing**:\n- Check duration: 20 minutes fixed\n- Request arrivals: one every 30 minutes (so one every 30 minutes, each arrival brings one request)\n\n**Assumptions/exclusions**:\n- Ignore reviewer breaks\n- Ignore rework\n- Ignore priority overrides\n- Don't model these aspects\n\nNow, I need to activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first, then analyze what the first consequential construction decision is.\n\nLet me think about what the first consequential SDCPN construction decision would be:\nPlaces hold requests and reviewer availability, transitions capture arrival/start-review/finish-review actions, tokens represent requests and reviewer capacity, colours carry eligibility data, and guards enforce the deterministic approve/reject logic. The first real decision is how to represent requests as tokens - individually distinguishable entities moving through places versus simple aggregate counts. This choice determines whether I can track per-request timing (needed for turnaround comparison) or just throughput.\n\nSince I need to compare approval turnaround per request, aggregation won't work - each request needs to be a distinct token carrying its own state and timestamp data.\n\nFor reviewers, the standard resource pattern applies: available reviewers as tokens in a pool place, consumed when review starts and returned when it completes.\n\nThe consequential decision is confirmed - individual tokens with request-specific attributes, since simple counts can't support per-request turnaround measurement or satisfy the stated purpose of the net.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01DAZ9vuKJ9R2WL9jRreGmYk", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2687, + "output": 1009, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3696, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0026869999999999997, + "output": 0.005045, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.007731999999999999 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:48.934Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to take a complete account of an operational process and use it directly as input for SDCPN modelling. They explicitly state:\n- Do not interview them\n- Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n- Do not mutate a net (don't construct the net yet, just identify the first decision point)\n\nLet me parse what they've given me:\n\n**Purpose**: Compare approval turnaround (time from submission to outcome) with 1 reviewer vs 2 reviewers.\n\n**Boundary**: One request lifecycle - from submission through approval or rejection.\n\n**Case spine (the core process**):\n1. A submission with one request arrives\n2. A reviewer becomes available and reserves/claims the request\n3. One available reviewer is selected (this is a critical resource constraint)\n4. Reviewer checks the request for 20 minutes (fixed duration)\n5. Based on documented eligibility rule in the request data, reviewer records either approved or rejected\n6. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer\n7. Request exits the boundary (approved or rejected)\n\n**Resources and initial state**:\n- Requests are distinct work items\n- Initially 1 available reviewer (scenario 1)\n- Comparison scenario: 2 available reviewers\n- A reviewer cannot check 2 requests concurrently (mutual exclusion on reviewers)\n\n**Branch evidence**:\n- The eligibility decision is deterministic based on request data (no randomness in approval/rejection)\n\n**Timing**:\n- Check duration: 20 minutes fixed\n- Request arrivals: one every 30 minutes (so one every 30 minutes, each arrival brings one request)\n\n**Assumptions/exclusions**:\n- Ignore reviewer breaks\n- Ignore rework\n- Ignore priority overrides\n- Don't model these aspects\n\nNow, I need to activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first, then analyze what the first consequential construction decision is.\n\nLet me think about what the first consequential SDCPN construction decision would be:\nPlaces hold requests and reviewer availability, transitions capture arrival/start-review/finish-review actions, tokens represent requests and reviewer capacity, colours carry eligibility data, and guards enforce the deterministic approve/reject logic. The first real decision is how to represent requests as tokens - individually distinguishable entities moving through places versus simple aggregate counts. This choice determines whether I can track per-request timing (needed for turnaround comparison) or just throughput.\n\nSince I need to compare approval turnaround per request, aggregation won't work - each request needs to be a distinct token carrying its own state and timestamp data.\n\nFor reviewers, the standard resource pattern applies: available reviewers as tokens in a pool place, consumed when review starts and returned when it completes.\n\nThe consequential decision is confirmed - individual tokens with request-specific attributes, since simple counts can't support per-request turnaround measurement or satisfy the stated purpose of the net.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01DAZ9vuKJ9R2WL9jRreGmYk", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2687, + "output": 1009, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3696, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0026869999999999997, + "output": 0.005045, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.007731999999999999 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 947 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284191015, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8BW3dGmN3XFJGb4Wiv", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:48.934Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DAZ9vuKJ9R2WL9jRreGmYk", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:48.936Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DAZ9vuKJ9R2WL9jRreGmYk", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284208939 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:48.939Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DAZ9vuKJ9R2WL9jRreGmYk", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284208939 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:48.939Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DAZ9vuKJ9R2WL9jRreGmYk", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 4, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:48.939Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0PG8VJRGNTZ6MTPZFG74Z", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to take a complete account of an operational process and use it directly as input for SDCPN modelling. They explicitly state:\n- Do not interview them\n- Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n- Do not mutate a net (don't construct the net yet, just identify the first decision point)\n\nLet me parse what they've given me:\n\n**Purpose**: Compare approval turnaround (time from submission to outcome) with 1 reviewer vs 2 reviewers.\n\n**Boundary**: One request lifecycle - from submission through approval or rejection.\n\n**Case spine (the core process**):\n1. A submission with one request arrives\n2. A reviewer becomes available and reserves/claims the request\n3. One available reviewer is selected (this is a critical resource constraint)\n4. Reviewer checks the request for 20 minutes (fixed duration)\n5. Based on documented eligibility rule in the request data, reviewer records either approved or rejected\n6. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer\n7. Request exits the boundary (approved or rejected)\n\n**Resources and initial state**:\n- Requests are distinct work items\n- Initially 1 available reviewer (scenario 1)\n- Comparison scenario: 2 available reviewers\n- A reviewer cannot check 2 requests concurrently (mutual exclusion on reviewers)\n\n**Branch evidence**:\n- The eligibility decision is deterministic based on request data (no randomness in approval/rejection)\n\n**Timing**:\n- Check duration: 20 minutes fixed\n- Request arrivals: one every 30 minutes (so one every 30 minutes, each arrival brings one request)\n\n**Assumptions/exclusions**:\n- Ignore reviewer breaks\n- Ignore rework\n- Ignore priority overrides\n- Don't model these aspects\n\nNow, I need to activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first, then analyze what the first consequential construction decision is.\n\nLet me think about what the first consequential SDCPN construction decision would be:\nPlaces hold requests and reviewer availability, transitions capture arrival/start-review/finish-review actions, tokens represent requests and reviewer capacity, colours carry eligibility data, and guards enforce the deterministic approve/reject logic. The first real decision is how to represent requests as tokens - individually distinguishable entities moving through places versus simple aggregate counts. This choice determines whether I can track per-request timing (needed for turnaround comparison) or just throughput.\n\nSince I need to compare approval turnaround per request, aggregation won't work - each request needs to be a distinct token carrying its own state and timestamp data.\n\nFor reviewers, the standard resource pattern applies: available reviewers as tokens in a pool place, consumed when review starts and returned when it completes.\n\nThe consequential decision is confirmed - individual tokens with request-specific attributes, since simple counts can't support per-request turnaround measurement or satisfy the stated purpose of the net.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01DAZ9vuKJ9R2WL9jRreGmYk", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2687, + "output": 1009, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3696, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0026869999999999997, + "output": 0.005045, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.007731999999999999 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 947 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284191015, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8BW3dGmN3XFJGb4Wiv", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DAZ9vuKJ9R2WL9jRreGmYk", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284208939 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:48.939Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:48.940Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to take a complete account of an operational process and use it directly as input for SDCPN modelling. They explicitly state:\n- Do not interview them\n- Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n- Do not mutate a net (don't construct the net yet, just identify the first decision point)\n\nLet me parse what they've given me:\n\n**Purpose**: Compare approval turnaround (time from submission to outcome) with 1 reviewer vs 2 reviewers.\n\n**Boundary**: One request lifecycle - from submission through approval or rejection.\n\n**Case spine (the core process**):\n1. A submission with one request arrives\n2. A reviewer becomes available and reserves/claims the request\n3. One available reviewer is selected (this is a critical resource constraint)\n4. Reviewer checks the request for 20 minutes (fixed duration)\n5. Based on documented eligibility rule in the request data, reviewer records either approved or rejected\n6. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer\n7. Request exits the boundary (approved or rejected)\n\n**Resources and initial state**:\n- Requests are distinct work items\n- Initially 1 available reviewer (scenario 1)\n- Comparison scenario: 2 available reviewers\n- A reviewer cannot check 2 requests concurrently (mutual exclusion on reviewers)\n\n**Branch evidence**:\n- The eligibility decision is deterministic based on request data (no randomness in approval/rejection)\n\n**Timing**:\n- Check duration: 20 minutes fixed\n- Request arrivals: one every 30 minutes (so one every 30 minutes, each arrival brings one request)\n\n**Assumptions/exclusions**:\n- Ignore reviewer breaks\n- Ignore rework\n- Ignore priority overrides\n- Don't model these aspects\n\nNow, I need to activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first, then analyze what the first consequential construction decision is.\n\nLet me think about what the first consequential SDCPN construction decision would be:\nPlaces hold requests and reviewer availability, transitions capture arrival/start-review/finish-review actions, tokens represent requests and reviewer capacity, colours carry eligibility data, and guards enforce the deterministic approve/reject logic. The first real decision is how to represent requests as tokens - individually distinguishable entities moving through places versus simple aggregate counts. This choice determines whether I can track per-request timing (needed for turnaround comparison) or just throughput.\n\nSince I need to compare approval turnaround per request, aggregation won't work - each request needs to be a distinct token carrying its own state and timestamp data.\n\nFor reviewers, the standard resource pattern applies: available reviewers as tokens in a pool place, consumed when review starts and returned when it completes.\n\nThe consequential decision is confirmed - individual tokens with request-specific attributes, since simple counts can't support per-request turnaround measurement or satisfy the stated purpose of the net.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01DAZ9vuKJ9R2WL9jRreGmYk", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DAZ9vuKJ9R2WL9jRreGmYk", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:48.940Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284208941 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:49.685Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:49.686Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "Good", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:50.688Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ", the skill", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:50.688Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " is activated. Now I need to determine whether I need to interview the user or if the supplied account already contains what I need to", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:50.688Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " proceed to a construction decision.\n\nThe user said \"Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me.\"", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:50.688Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "\n\nSo the account is complete enough for construction-only execution. I should:\n1. Not ask questions\n2. Move toward identifying", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:51.703Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n3. Stop there without mutating a", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:51.703Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " net\n\nLet me think through what the first consequential decision would be:\n\nThe account describes:\n- A process where requests", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:51.703Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " arrive, get reviewed (20 min fixed), and exit as approved/rejected\n- Two", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:51.703Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " scenarios: 1 reviewer vs 2 reviewers\n- Requests are distinct work items", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 57, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:52.932Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "\n- Eligibility rule is deterministic based on request data\n\nIn SDCPN terms, the first major structural", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 58, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:52.932Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " decision is: **How should requests be represented in the net - as individual tokens carrying", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 59, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:52.932Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " data, or as aggregated counts?**\n\nThis is consequential because:\n1. The stated purpose is to \"compare approval turnaround\" -", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 60, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:52.932Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " this requires tracking individual request transit time through the system\n2. The problem states \"requests are distinct work items\" ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 61, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:54.261Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "\n3. The branch evidence says the eligibility decision is deterministic based on \"request data already carried by the request\"\n\nThis", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 62, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:54.261Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " means requests cannot be aggregated as simple counts - each request must be a distinct token that carries data attributes (", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 63, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:54.261Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "its identification, eligibility status, arrival time for measuring turnaround).\n\nThis is the first consequential decision because everything", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 64, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:54.261Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " else (place structure, transition logic, guards) depends on whether we track individual requests or aggregate them. Once we decide to use", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 65, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:55.112Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " individual request tokens with data attributes, we've committed to a coloured Petri net where tokens are tuples rather", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 66, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:55.112Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " than simple unmarked tokens.\n\nLet me state this decision point clearly.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 67, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:55.112Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I need to determine whether I need to interview the user or if the supplied account already contains what I need to proceed to a construction decision.\n\nThe user said \"Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me.\"\n\nSo the account is complete enough for construction-only execution. I should:\n1. Not ask questions\n2. Move toward identifying the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n3. Stop there without mutating a net\n\nLet me think through what the first consequential decision would be:\n\nThe account describes:\n- A process where requests arrive, get reviewed (20 min fixed), and exit as approved/rejected\n- Two scenarios: 1 reviewer vs 2 reviewers\n- Requests are distinct work items\n- Eligibility rule is deterministic based on request data\n\nIn SDCPN terms, the first major structural decision is: **How should requests be represented in the net - as individual tokens carrying data, or as aggregated counts?**\n\nThis is consequential because:\n1. The stated purpose is to \"compare approval turnaround\" - this requires tracking individual request transit time through the system\n2. The problem states \"requests are distinct work items\" \n3. The branch evidence says the eligibility decision is deterministic based on \"request data already carried by the request\"\n\nThis means requests cannot be aggregated as simple counts - each request must be a distinct token that carries data attributes (its identification, eligibility status, arrival time for measuring turnaround).\n\nThis is the first consequential decision because everything else (place structure, transition logic, guards) depends on whether we track individual requests or aggregate them. Once we decide to use individual request tokens with data attributes, we've committed to a coloured Petri net where tokens are tuples rather than simple unmarked tokens.\n\nLet me state this decision point clearly.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 68, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:55.112Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "Based on the supplied account, I can identify", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 69, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:56.115Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " the first consequential SDCPN construction decision without further interview.\n\n**First Consequential Decision Point:**\n\nRequests must be represented as individual tokens, each carrying request-specific data attributes,", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 70, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:56.115Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " rather than as aggregated counts in places.\n\n**Why this is consequential:**\n\n1. **Purpose requirement:** Comparing approval turnaround means measuring", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 71, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:56.115Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " elapsed time from submission to outcome for each request. This requires individual request tracking, not aggregate counts.\n\n2. **Explicit boundary:** The problem states \"requests are", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 72, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:56.115Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " distinct work items\" and each one traverses a boundary from submission through approval or rejection.\n\n3. **Branch evidence:** The account specifies the eligibility decision r", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 73, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:57.437Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ests on \"request data already carried by the request\"—the deterministic rule is inherent to each request's attributes,", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 74, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:57.437Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " not external. Each token must hold the data that determines its outcome.\n\n4. **Net consequence:** This commits", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 75, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:57.437Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " the model to **coloured Petri nets** (CPNs) where tokens are tuples containing at least:\n - Request identity\n - Eligibility determination (", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 76, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:58.465Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "or raw request attributes from which it derives)\n - Arrival timestamp (to measure turnaround)", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 77, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:58.465Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "\n\nThis decision propagates forward: places will hold request tokens in distinct states (", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 78, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:58.465Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "submitted, under_review, approved, rejected); transitions will move and transform request tokens; guards and arc expressions", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 79, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:58.465Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " will route tokens based on their carried eligibility status. The resource pool (available", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 80, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:59.501Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " reviewers) remains a simpler count-based token pool, but requests themselves", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 81, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:59.501Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " cannot.\n\n**I stop here.** The workpiece, construction method, and first blocking", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 82, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:59.501Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " decision are now visible. No net has been mutated.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 83, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:59.501Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 10564, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8CpPTvPftkcbKVnTet", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I need to determine whether I need to interview the user or if the supplied account already contains what I need to proceed to a construction decision.\n\nThe user said \"Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me.\"\n\nSo the account is complete enough for construction-only execution. I should:\n1. Not ask questions\n2. Move toward identifying the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n3. Stop there without mutating a net\n\nLet me think through what the first consequential decision would be:\n\nThe account describes:\n- A process where requests arrive, get reviewed (20 min fixed), and exit as approved/rejected\n- Two scenarios: 1 reviewer vs 2 reviewers\n- Requests are distinct work items\n- Eligibility rule is deterministic based on request data\n\nIn SDCPN terms, the first major structural decision is: **How should requests be represented in the net - as individual tokens carrying data, or as aggregated counts?**\n\nThis is consequential because:\n1. The stated purpose is to \"compare approval turnaround\" - this requires tracking individual request transit time through the system\n2. The problem states \"requests are distinct work items\" \n3. The branch evidence says the eligibility decision is deterministic based on \"request data already carried by the request\"\n\nThis means requests cannot be aggregated as simple counts - each request must be a distinct token that carries data attributes (its identification, eligibility status, arrival time for measuring turnaround).\n\nThis is the first consequential decision because everything else (place structure, transition logic, guards) depends on whether we track individual requests or aggregate them. Once we decide to use individual request tokens with data attributes, we've committed to a coloured Petri net where tokens are tuples rather than simple unmarked tokens.\n\nLet me state this decision point clearly.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Based on the supplied account, I can identify the first consequential SDCPN construction decision without further interview.\n\n**First Consequential Decision Point:**\n\nRequests must be represented as individual tokens, each carrying request-specific data attributes, rather than as aggregated counts in places.\n\n**Why this is consequential:**\n\n1. **Purpose requirement:** Comparing approval turnaround means measuring elapsed time from submission to outcome for each request. This requires individual request tracking, not aggregate counts.\n\n2. **Explicit boundary:** The problem states \"requests are distinct work items\" and each one traverses a boundary from submission through approval or rejection.\n\n3. **Branch evidence:** The account specifies the eligibility decision rests on \"request data already carried by the request\"—the deterministic rule is inherent to each request's attributes, not external. Each token must hold the data that determines its outcome.\n\n4. **Net consequence:** This commits the model to **coloured Petri nets** (CPNs) where tokens are tuples containing at least:\n - Request identity\n - Eligibility determination (or raw request attributes from which it derives)\n - Arrival timestamp (to measure turnaround)\n\nThis decision propagates forward: places will hold request tokens in distinct states (submitted, under_review, approved, rejected); transitions will move and transform request tokens; guards and arc expressions will route tokens based on their carried eligibility status. The resource pool (available reviewers) remains a simpler count-based token pool, but requests themselves cannot.\n\n**I stop here.** The workpiece, construction method, and first blocking decision are now visible. No net has been mutated." + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 778, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4825, + "totalTokens": 5615, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.0038900000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.00603125, + "total": 0.009933250000000001 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 84, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:59.504Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I need to determine whether I need to interview the user or if the supplied account already contains what I need to proceed to a construction decision.\n\nThe user said \"Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me.\"\n\nSo the account is complete enough for construction-only execution. I should:\n1. Not ask questions\n2. Move toward identifying the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n3. Stop there without mutating a net\n\nLet me think through what the first consequential decision would be:\n\nThe account describes:\n- A process where requests arrive, get reviewed (20 min fixed), and exit as approved/rejected\n- Two scenarios: 1 reviewer vs 2 reviewers\n- Requests are distinct work items\n- Eligibility rule is deterministic based on request data\n\nIn SDCPN terms, the first major structural decision is: **How should requests be represented in the net - as individual tokens carrying data, or as aggregated counts?**\n\nThis is consequential because:\n1. The stated purpose is to \"compare approval turnaround\" - this requires tracking individual request transit time through the system\n2. The problem states \"requests are distinct work items\" \n3. The branch evidence says the eligibility decision is deterministic based on \"request data already carried by the request\"\n\nThis means requests cannot be aggregated as simple counts - each request must be a distinct token that carries data attributes (its identification, eligibility status, arrival time for measuring turnaround).\n\nThis is the first consequential decision because everything else (place structure, transition logic, guards) depends on whether we track individual requests or aggregate them. Once we decide to use individual request tokens with data attributes, we've committed to a coloured Petri net where tokens are tuples rather than simple unmarked tokens.\n\nLet me state this decision point clearly.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Based on the supplied account, I can identify the first consequential SDCPN construction decision without further interview.\n\n**First Consequential Decision Point:**\n\nRequests must be represented as individual tokens, each carrying request-specific data attributes, rather than as aggregated counts in places.\n\n**Why this is consequential:**\n\n1. **Purpose requirement:** Comparing approval turnaround means measuring elapsed time from submission to outcome for each request. This requires individual request tracking, not aggregate counts.\n\n2. **Explicit boundary:** The problem states \"requests are distinct work items\" and each one traverses a boundary from submission through approval or rejection.\n\n3. **Branch evidence:** The account specifies the eligibility decision rests on \"request data already carried by the request\"—the deterministic rule is inherent to each request's attributes, not external. Each token must hold the data that determines its outcome.\n\n4. **Net consequence:** This commits the model to **coloured Petri nets** (CPNs) where tokens are tuples containing at least:\n - Request identity\n - Eligibility determination (or raw request attributes from which it derives)\n - Arrival timestamp (to measure turnaround)\n\nThis decision propagates forward: places will hold request tokens in distinct states (submitted, under_review, approved, rejected); transitions will move and transform request tokens; guards and arc expressions will route tokens based on their carried eligibility status. The resource pool (available reviewers) remains a simpler count-based token pool, but requests themselves cannot.\n\n**I stop here.** The workpiece, construction method, and first blocking decision are now visible. No net has been mutated." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 778, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4825, + "totalTokens": 5615, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.0038900000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.00603125, + "total": 0.009933250000000001 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 412 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284208941, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8CpPTvPftkcbKVnTet", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 85, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:59.504Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0Q1SCDJEQ9TGE12YBCSNJ", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I need to determine whether I need to interview the user or if the supplied account already contains what I need to proceed to a construction decision.\n\nThe user said \"Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me.\"\n\nSo the account is complete enough for construction-only execution. I should:\n1. Not ask questions\n2. Move toward identifying the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n3. Stop there without mutating a net\n\nLet me think through what the first consequential decision would be:\n\nThe account describes:\n- A process where requests arrive, get reviewed (20 min fixed), and exit as approved/rejected\n- Two scenarios: 1 reviewer vs 2 reviewers\n- Requests are distinct work items\n- Eligibility rule is deterministic based on request data\n\nIn SDCPN terms, the first major structural decision is: **How should requests be represented in the net - as individual tokens carrying data, or as aggregated counts?**\n\nThis is consequential because:\n1. The stated purpose is to \"compare approval turnaround\" - this requires tracking individual request transit time through the system\n2. The problem states \"requests are distinct work items\" \n3. The branch evidence says the eligibility decision is deterministic based on \"request data already carried by the request\"\n\nThis means requests cannot be aggregated as simple counts - each request must be a distinct token that carries data attributes (its identification, eligibility status, arrival time for measuring turnaround).\n\nThis is the first consequential decision because everything else (place structure, transition logic, guards) depends on whether we track individual requests or aggregate them. Once we decide to use individual request tokens with data attributes, we've committed to a coloured Petri net where tokens are tuples rather than simple unmarked tokens.\n\nLet me state this decision point clearly.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Based on the supplied account, I can identify the first consequential SDCPN construction decision without further interview.\n\n**First Consequential Decision Point:**\n\nRequests must be represented as individual tokens, each carrying request-specific data attributes, rather than as aggregated counts in places.\n\n**Why this is consequential:**\n\n1. **Purpose requirement:** Comparing approval turnaround means measuring elapsed time from submission to outcome for each request. This requires individual request tracking, not aggregate counts.\n\n2. **Explicit boundary:** The problem states \"requests are distinct work items\" and each one traverses a boundary from submission through approval or rejection.\n\n3. **Branch evidence:** The account specifies the eligibility decision rests on \"request data already carried by the request\"—the deterministic rule is inherent to each request's attributes, not external. Each token must hold the data that determines its outcome.\n\n4. **Net consequence:** This commits the model to **coloured Petri nets** (CPNs) where tokens are tuples containing at least:\n - Request identity\n - Eligibility determination (or raw request attributes from which it derives)\n - Arrival timestamp (to measure turnaround)\n\nThis decision propagates forward: places will hold request tokens in distinct states (submitted, under_review, approved, rejected); transitions will move and transform request tokens; guards and arc expressions will route tokens based on their carried eligibility status. The resource pool (available reviewers) remains a simpler count-based token pool, but requests themselves cannot.\n\n**I stop here.** The workpiece, construction method, and first blocking decision are now visible. No net has been mutated." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 778, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4825, + "totalTokens": 5615, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.0038900000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.00603125, + "total": 0.009933250000000001 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 412 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284208941, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8CpPTvPftkcbKVnTet", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 86, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:59.504Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to take a complete account of an operational process and use it directly as input for SDCPN modelling. They explicitly state:\n- Do not interview them\n- Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n- Do not mutate a net (don't construct the net yet, just identify the first decision point)\n\nLet me parse what they've given me:\n\n**Purpose**: Compare approval turnaround (time from submission to outcome) with 1 reviewer vs 2 reviewers.\n\n**Boundary**: One request lifecycle - from submission through approval or rejection.\n\n**Case spine (the core process**):\n1. A submission with one request arrives\n2. A reviewer becomes available and reserves/claims the request\n3. One available reviewer is selected (this is a critical resource constraint)\n4. Reviewer checks the request for 20 minutes (fixed duration)\n5. Based on documented eligibility rule in the request data, reviewer records either approved or rejected\n6. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer\n7. Request exits the boundary (approved or rejected)\n\n**Resources and initial state**:\n- Requests are distinct work items\n- Initially 1 available reviewer (scenario 1)\n- Comparison scenario: 2 available reviewers\n- A reviewer cannot check 2 requests concurrently (mutual exclusion on reviewers)\n\n**Branch evidence**:\n- The eligibility decision is deterministic based on request data (no randomness in approval/rejection)\n\n**Timing**:\n- Check duration: 20 minutes fixed\n- Request arrivals: one every 30 minutes (so one every 30 minutes, each arrival brings one request)\n\n**Assumptions/exclusions**:\n- Ignore reviewer breaks\n- Ignore rework\n- Ignore priority overrides\n- Don't model these aspects\n\nNow, I need to activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first, then analyze what the first consequential construction decision is.\n\nLet me think about what the first consequential SDCPN construction decision would be:\nPlaces hold requests and reviewer availability, transitions capture arrival/start-review/finish-review actions, tokens represent requests and reviewer capacity, colours carry eligibility data, and guards enforce the deterministic approve/reject logic. The first real decision is how to represent requests as tokens - individually distinguishable entities moving through places versus simple aggregate counts. This choice determines whether I can track per-request timing (needed for turnaround comparison) or just throughput.\n\nSince I need to compare approval turnaround per request, aggregation won't work - each request needs to be a distinct token carrying its own state and timestamp data.\n\nFor reviewers, the standard resource pattern applies: available reviewers as tokens in a pool place, consumed when review starts and returned when it completes.\n\nThe consequential decision is confirmed - individual tokens with request-specific attributes, since simple counts can't support per-request turnaround measurement or satisfy the stated purpose of the net.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01DAZ9vuKJ9R2WL9jRreGmYk", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2687, + "output": 1009, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3696, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0026869999999999997, + "output": 0.005045, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.007731999999999999 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 947 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284191015, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8BW3dGmN3XFJGb4Wiv", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DAZ9vuKJ9R2WL9jRreGmYk", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284208939 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I need to determine whether I need to interview the user or if the supplied account already contains what I need to proceed to a construction decision.\n\nThe user said \"Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me.\"\n\nSo the account is complete enough for construction-only execution. I should:\n1. Not ask questions\n2. Move toward identifying the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n3. Stop there without mutating a net\n\nLet me think through what the first consequential decision would be:\n\nThe account describes:\n- A process where requests arrive, get reviewed (20 min fixed), and exit as approved/rejected\n- Two scenarios: 1 reviewer vs 2 reviewers\n- Requests are distinct work items\n- Eligibility rule is deterministic based on request data\n\nIn SDCPN terms, the first major structural decision is: **How should requests be represented in the net - as individual tokens carrying data, or as aggregated counts?**\n\nThis is consequential because:\n1. The stated purpose is to \"compare approval turnaround\" - this requires tracking individual request transit time through the system\n2. The problem states \"requests are distinct work items\" \n3. The branch evidence says the eligibility decision is deterministic based on \"request data already carried by the request\"\n\nThis means requests cannot be aggregated as simple counts - each request must be a distinct token that carries data attributes (its identification, eligibility status, arrival time for measuring turnaround).\n\nThis is the first consequential decision because everything else (place structure, transition logic, guards) depends on whether we track individual requests or aggregate them. Once we decide to use individual request tokens with data attributes, we've committed to a coloured Petri net where tokens are tuples rather than simple unmarked tokens.\n\nLet me state this decision point clearly.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Based on the supplied account, I can identify the first consequential SDCPN construction decision without further interview.\n\n**First Consequential Decision Point:**\n\nRequests must be represented as individual tokens, each carrying request-specific data attributes, rather than as aggregated counts in places.\n\n**Why this is consequential:**\n\n1. **Purpose requirement:** Comparing approval turnaround means measuring elapsed time from submission to outcome for each request. This requires individual request tracking, not aggregate counts.\n\n2. **Explicit boundary:** The problem states \"requests are distinct work items\" and each one traverses a boundary from submission through approval or rejection.\n\n3. **Branch evidence:** The account specifies the eligibility decision rests on \"request data already carried by the request\"—the deterministic rule is inherent to each request's attributes, not external. Each token must hold the data that determines its outcome.\n\n4. **Net consequence:** This commits the model to **coloured Petri nets** (CPNs) where tokens are tuples containing at least:\n - Request identity\n - Eligibility determination (or raw request attributes from which it derives)\n - Arrival timestamp (to measure turnaround)\n\nThis decision propagates forward: places will hold request tokens in distinct states (submitted, under_review, approved, rejected); transitions will move and transform request tokens; guards and arc expressions will route tokens based on their carried eligibility status. The resource pool (available reviewers) remains a simpler count-based token pool, but requests themselves cannot.\n\n**I stop here.** The workpiece, construction method, and first blocking decision are now visible. No net has been mutated." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 778, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4825, + "totalTokens": 5615, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.0038900000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.00603125, + "total": 0.009933250000000001 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 412 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284208941, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8CpPTvPftkcbKVnTet", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 87, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:59.505Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 28507, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 88, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:59.505Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0PG7V7PXAATBDN65B6E40", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0PG8NS6NRK7SK5Z2QKQZ9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 89, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:59.506Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0PG7SBVZHWBGDY6SJNENC", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "3bbb4105be4b008f3af0997e63d8971b41979a31a820981d81d48ebb0d591b35", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 90, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:36:59.506Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "d2d42344c40ddeb2471eeeba437032079bd2c7083afdbc2f9de5e823f841d5b8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "ebec2ac5faab6cbbbe26eeeebc2d7ac0ba7dc637fd43ea9b5917f8e0277f5515", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "c7cb5b2222b0d1b5aff861c4056f41ba8825aca284ec774d8e4f0fbf12807314", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "321f8405c12374315d61caf466001d6b4b5cf68b04325df77a7948daaa680de1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/scenarios.json": "1844df940b8de9d10d28e9537f966920aba581b36956a9ac26a3767824ca96cb", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/protocol.md": "ef1443bb02c6c26d4ded6edf9e023579bc32cdc394f90490edfb34eaf32b8ed2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md": "8cd2749c8292f01045ab4282fc7248c07046cecaf14a586a9ef286e2876cf8bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md": "82b035268c07cc8ee4736b5ffdd392c8f153793d2ca6b9ed57271c9b6146de10", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md": "8826b85d32d6c24fbc8f678ec394600676ec61c4a0b83d0a9cfa16be87fc5d76", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "1a2417cc5f9649d459c5efbc87cd3242db99a9717622a6d86073c72835818865" + }, + "promptSelection": { + "candidateCorePromptIncluded": true, + "v3SdcpnAppendIncluded": true, + "legacyCorePromptIncluded": false, + "legacyRoleMarkerIncluded": false, + "initialSystemPromptSha256": "2156970b82b41d6893d08177fad8127a336be4afb5fd0bb184a52a7f63878fb8" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "candidateCorePrompt": "6a458c0bbbc9dee5b4454a54b032818227ab681ba9f7beaa60d4fe9628f6eb41", + "v3SdcpnAppend": "73cac46487d33051a90cc487ea7abfc11fec4b049af11a108396ec08d44569fb", + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S2-packaged-r1.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S2-packaged-r1.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9a5b9d51e1b --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S2-packaged-r1.json @@ -0,0 +1,3230 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v3-packaged-s2-09ecf4b2", + "phase": "paid", + "instrumentVersion": "v3", + "candidate": "packaged", + "scenarioId": "S2", + "scenario": { + "title": "Adequate construct-only request", + "prompt": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them.", + "stopAfter": "The first consequential construction decision.", + "expected": "Enter construction guidance without loading universal elicitation or asking a question." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "From the supplied account, I have a complete operational description. Let me assemble the workpiece and identify the first construction decision.\n\n```runbook-ir\n# Approval-Turnaround Comparison: One vs Two Reviewers\n\n## Purpose\nCompare approval turnaround time (submission to approval or rejection) under single-reviewer and two-reviewer resource states.\n\n## Boundary\nOne request from submission through final approval or rejection.\n\n## Process spine\n1. Request arrives (external input, one per 30 minutes)\n2. A reviewer becomes available and reserves the request\n3. Reviewer checks the request (fixed 20 minutes)\n4. Reviewer records the outcome (approved or rejected) according to deterministic eligibility rule carried in request data\n5. Reviewer releases; request leaves the boundary with its outcome\n\n## Resources and initial state\n- Requests: distinct work items, unbounded arrival supply\n- Reviewers: consumable resource, initially 1 available (scenario: compare with 2)\n- Constraint: a reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n\n## Logical rules and data\n- Branching: approved vs. rejected is deterministic from request data (no probability)\n- Release: reviewer becomes available after recording the outcome\n\n## Timing\n- Check duration: 20 minutes (fixed)\n- Request inter-arrival: 30 minutes (fixed)\n- Setup, contention resolution, breaks, rework, priority overrides: excluded per scope limits\n\n## Representation notes\n- The eligibility rule is recorded in request data; the model does not execute validation logic itself\n- Comparison between scenarios (1 vs. 2 reviewers) will parameterize initial available-reviewer count\n```\n\n---\n\n## First Consequential Construction Decision\n\n**How to represent the available-reviewer count for scenario comparison:**\n\nThe account requires modeling two distinct resource states—one reviewer vs. two reviewers—to support the stated comparison purpose. The first consequential decision is whether the number of available reviewers is represented as a **scalar parameter** (allowing both scenarios to use the same net with different initial values) or as separate **hardcoded initial markings** (requiring two separate nets).\n\n**The decision:** Represent available reviewers as a parameter governing initial marking, so a single net definition can be loaded with different parameter values to run both scenarios.\n\nThis is consequential because it determines whether the net is reusable across the comparison scenarios or must be manually duplicated and edited for each case. The construction pattern for contended resources supports this choice directly: hold available resource instances in shared state, acquired at work-start and released at completion.\n\nI stop here without mutating a net.", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "toolu_01H9Apr8tPHiaMypkThs7FVJ", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "toolu_01EXvqRQzirwvK4G7JXbtYmz", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + }, + "output": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [ + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "sha256": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694" + } + ], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 3562, + "inputTokens": 2635, + "outputTokens": 333, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 2968, + "cost": 0.0043 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3281, + "inputTokens": 12, + "outputTokens": 354, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4140, + "totalTokens": 4506, + "cost": 0.006957 + }, + { + "durationMs": 13303, + "inputTokens": 13, + "outputTokens": 1000, + "cacheReadTokens": 4140, + "cacheWriteTokens": 2313, + "totalTokens": 7466, + "cost": 0.008318250000000001 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 20146, + "inputTokens": 2660, + "outputTokens": 1687, + "cacheReadTokens": 4140, + "cacheWriteTokens": 6453, + "totalTokens": 14940, + "cost": 0.019575250000000002 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nUse the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them.\n\n## Assistant\nFrom the supplied account, I have a complete operational description. Let me assemble the workpiece and identify the first construction decision.\n\n```runbook-ir\n# Approval-Turnaround Comparison: One vs Two Reviewers\n\n## Purpose\nCompare approval turnaround time (submission to approval or rejection) under single-reviewer and two-reviewer resource states.\n\n## Boundary\nOne request from submission through final approval or rejection.\n\n## Process spine\n1. Request arrives (external input, one per 30 minutes)\n2. A reviewer becomes available and reserves the request\n3. Reviewer checks the request (fixed 20 minutes)\n4. Reviewer records the outcome (approved or rejected) according to deterministic eligibility rule carried in request data\n5. Reviewer releases; request leaves the boundary with its outcome\n\n## Resources and initial state\n- Requests: distinct work items, unbounded arrival supply\n- Reviewers: consumable resource, initially 1 available (scenario: compare with 2)\n- Constraint: a reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n\n## Logical rules and data\n- Branching: approved vs. rejected is deterministic from request data (no probability)\n- Release: reviewer becomes available after recording the outcome\n\n## Timing\n- Check duration: 20 minutes (fixed)\n- Request inter-arrival: 30 minutes (fixed)\n- Setup, contention resolution, breaks, rework, priority overrides: excluded per scope limits\n\n## Representation notes\n- The eligibility rule is recorded in request data; the model does not execute validation logic itself\n- Comparison between scenarios (1 vs. 2 reviewers) will parameterize initial available-reviewer count\n```\n\n---\n\n## First Consequential Construction Decision\n\n**How to represent the available-reviewer count for scenario comparison:**\n\nThe account requires modeling two distinct resource states—one reviewer vs. two reviewers—to support the stated comparison purpose. The first consequential decision is whether the number of available reviewers is represented as a **scalar parameter** (allowing both scenarios to use the same net with different initial values) or as separate **hardcoded initial markings** (requiring two separate nets).\n\n**The decision:** Represent available reviewers as a parameter governing initial marking, so a single net definition can be loaded with different parameter values to run both scenarios.\n\nThis is consequential because it determines whether the net is reusable across the comparison scenarios or must be manually duplicated and edited for each case. The construction pattern for contended resources supports this choice directly: hold available resource instances in shared state, acquired at work-start and released at completion.\n\nI stop here without mutating a net.\n- tool activate_skill (toolu_01H9Apr8tPHiaMypkThs7FVJ): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\\n\\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\\n\\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\\n\\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\\n\\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (toolu_01EXvqRQzirwvK4G7JXbtYmz): \"# SDCPN Construction\\n\\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\\n\\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\\n\\n## Construction boundary\\n\\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\\n\\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\\n\\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\\n\\n## Mapping principles\\n\\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\\n| --- | --- |\\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\\n\\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\\n\\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\\n\\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\\n\\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\\n\\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\\n\\n## Construction patterns\\n\\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\\n\\n### Timed work\\n\\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\\n\\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\\n\\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\\n\\n### Contended resource\\n\\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\\n\\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\\n\\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\\n\\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\\n\\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\\n\\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\\n\\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\\n\\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\\n\\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\\n\\n### Mode change\\n\\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\\n\\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\\n\\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\\n\\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\\n\\n### Spatial transfer\\n\\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\\n\\n### Hidden waiting\\n\\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\\n\\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\\n\\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\\n\\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\\n\\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\\n\\nNot acceptable:\\n\\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\\n\\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\\n\\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\\n\\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\\n\\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\\n\\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000042", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFGME1RU1A5WTFXUk1LSDBBQjI4UDlB", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1F0MRR55SNN5EV8KEDN5JSH", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MQTMGJ5FSWN8Z23FMKEW", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The user is asking me to:\n1. Use the supplied account as complete modelling input\n2. Not interview them\n3. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n4. Don't mutate a net\n\nThey've supplied a complete operational process account for a comparison purpose: one reviewer vs two reviewer scenarios.\n\nLet me activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first, as instructed in the universal elicitation role for SDCPN work.\n\nThe account describes:\n- Purpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two\n- Boundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection\n- Process: submission → reviewer reserves + checks (20 min) → records outcome (approved/rejected, determined by eligibility rule in request data) → releases reviewer → request leaves\n- Resources: initially 1 reviewer; comparison with 2 reviewers. Reviewer can't check 2 requests concurrently.\n- Timing: checks = 20 min fixed, requests arrive every 30 min\n- Assumptions: ignore breaks, rework, priority overrides\n\nI need to activate the skill and then identify the first consequential SDCPN construction decision without conducting an interview.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01H9Apr8tPHiaMypkThs7FVJ", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 4 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The skill instructions tell me that I'm in the \"construct-only execution\" branch because the user supplied complete modelling input and said not to interview. The instructions say:\n\n\"Use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\"\n\nHowever, the user also said \"Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\" This means I should:\n1. Identify and state the first consequential construction decision\n2. NOT actually construct or mutate a net\n3. Stop there\n\nSo I need to:\n1. Assemble the workpiece from the supplied account\n2. Read the pn-construction.md resource to understand what construction decisions exist\n3. Identify the first consequential one\n4. State it\n5. Stop\n\nLet me read the construction resource first to understand what the first consequential decision would be.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01EXvqRQzirwvK4G7JXbtYmz", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + }, + "output": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n", + "durationMs": 1 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good. Now I have the construction guidance. The user's account supplies:\n\n**Process spine:**\n- Request arrives (at 30-min intervals)\n- Reviewer reserves the request (and acquires one available reviewer)\n- Reviewer checks request for 20 minutes\n- Outcome (approved/rejected) is determined by eligibility rule in request data and recorded\n- Reviewer is released\n- Request (with outcome) leaves\n\n**Resources:**\n- Reviewers: initially 1 (scenario: compare with 2)\n- Requests: arrive one at a time every 30 minutes\n\n**Key constraints:**\n- A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n- Deterministic branching (eligibility rule determines outcome)\n\n**Exclusions:**\n- No reviewer breaks, rework, priority overrides\n\nNow, the first consequential SDCPN construction decision in this domain would be about how to represent the reviewer resource and the comparison between 1-reviewer and 2-reviewer scenarios.\n\nAccording to the construction principles, this involves:\n1. **Resource representation**: How to model available reviewers (contended resource pattern)\n2. **Scenario parameterization**: How the comparison between 1 and 2 reviewers is represented\n\nThe first consequential decision is: **Should the number of available reviewers be represented as an initial-marking parameter (allowing scenario comparison by changing that parameter), or as a hardcoded initial marking for two separate nets?**\n\nThe construction pattern for contended resources says: \"Hold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held...\"\n\nFor a fair comparison and reusability, the standard approach would be to parameterize the initial count of reviewer tokens. This is the first consequential decision because it determines whether the model is scenario-agnostic or requires two separate nets.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "From the supplied account, I have a complete operational description. Let me assemble the workpiece and identify the first construction decision.\n\n```runbook-ir\n# Approval-Turnaround Comparison: One vs Two Reviewers\n\n## Purpose\nCompare approval turnaround time (submission to approval or rejection) under single-reviewer and two-reviewer resource states.\n\n## Boundary\nOne request from submission through final approval or rejection.\n\n## Process spine\n1. Request arrives (external input, one per 30 minutes)\n2. A reviewer becomes available and reserves the request\n3. Reviewer checks the request (fixed 20 minutes)\n4. Reviewer records the outcome (approved or rejected) according to deterministic eligibility rule carried in request data\n5. Reviewer releases; request leaves the boundary with its outcome\n\n## Resources and initial state\n- Requests: distinct work items, unbounded arrival supply\n- Reviewers: consumable resource, initially 1 available (scenario: compare with 2)\n- Constraint: a reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n\n## Logical rules and data\n- Branching: approved vs. rejected is deterministic from request data (no probability)\n- Release: reviewer becomes available after recording the outcome\n\n## Timing\n- Check duration: 20 minutes (fixed)\n- Request inter-arrival: 30 minutes (fixed)\n- Setup, contention resolution, breaks, rework, priority overrides: excluded per scope limits\n\n## Representation notes\n- The eligibility rule is recorded in request data; the model does not execute validation logic itself\n- Comparison between scenarios (1 vs. 2 reviewers) will parameterize initial available-reviewer count\n```\n\n---\n\n## First Consequential Construction Decision\n\n**How to represent the available-reviewer count for scenario comparison:**\n\nThe account requires modeling two distinct resource states—one reviewer vs. two reviewers—to support the stated comparison purpose. The first consequential decision is whether the number of available reviewers is represented as a **scalar parameter** (allowing both scenarios to use the same net with different initial values) or as separate **hardcoded initial markings** (requiring two separate nets).\n\n**The decision:** Represent available reviewers as a parameter governing initial marking, so a single net definition can be loaded with different parameter values to run both scenarios.\n\nThis is consequential because it determines whether the net is reusable across the comparison scenarios or must be manually duplicated and edited for each case. The construction pattern for contended resources supports this choice directly: hold available resource instances in shared state, acquired at work-start and released at completion.\n\nI stop here without mutating a net.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1F0MQSPVCSE5XW6304XBFQH" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:33.176Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:33.178Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:33.198Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:33.204Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MQTMGJ5FSWN8Z23FMKEW", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:33.204Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MQTMGJ5FSWN8Z23FMKEW", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:33.204Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284133216 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MQTMGJ5FSWN8Z23FMKEW", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:34.150Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MQTMGJ5FSWN8Z23FMKEW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:34.152Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "The user is asking me to:", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MQTMGJ5FSWN8Z23FMKEW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:35.155Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "\n1. Use the supplied account as complete", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MQTMGJ5FSWN8Z23FMKEW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:35.155Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " modelling input\n2. Not interview", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MQTMGJ5FSWN8Z23FMKEW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:35.155Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " them", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MQTMGJ5FSWN8Z23FMKEW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:35.155Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "\n3. Stop after stating the first", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MQTMGJ5FSWN8Z23FMKEW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:35.155Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " consequential SDCPN construction", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MQTMGJ5FSWN8Z23FMKEW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:35.155Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " decision\n4. Don't mutate", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MQTMGJ5FSWN8Z23FMKEW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:35.155Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " a net\n\nThey've supplied a complete operational process account for a comparison purpose: one reviewer vs two reviewer", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MQTMGJ5FSWN8Z23FMKEW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:35.155Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " scenarios.\n\nLet me activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first, as instructed in the universal elicitation role for", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MQTMGJ5FSWN8Z23FMKEW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:35.155Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " SDCPN work.\n\nThe account describes:\n- Purpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two\n- Boundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection\n- Process: submission → reviewer", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MQTMGJ5FSWN8Z23FMKEW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:36.231Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " reserves + checks (20 min) → records outcome (approved/rejected, determined by eligibility rule in request data) → releases reviewer →", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MQTMGJ5FSWN8Z23FMKEW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:36.231Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " request leaves\n- Resources: initially 1 reviewer; comparison with 2 reviewers. Reviewer can't check 2 requests concurrently.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MQTMGJ5FSWN8Z23FMKEW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:36.231Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "\n- Timing: checks = 20 min fixed, requests arrive every 30 min\n- Assumptions: ignore breaks, rework, priority overrides\n\nI need to activate the skill and then identify the first consequential SDCP", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MQTMGJ5FSWN8Z23FMKEW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:36.231Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "N construction decision without conducting an interview.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MQTMGJ5FSWN8Z23FMKEW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:36.588Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "The user is asking me to:\n1. Use the supplied account as complete modelling input\n2. Not interview them\n3. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n4. Don't mutate a net\n\nThey've supplied a complete operational process account for a comparison purpose: one reviewer vs two reviewer scenarios.\n\nLet me activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first, as instructed in the universal elicitation role for SDCPN work.\n\nThe account describes:\n- Purpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two\n- Boundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection\n- Process: submission → reviewer reserves + checks (20 min) → records outcome (approved/rejected, determined by eligibility rule in request data) → releases reviewer → request leaves\n- Resources: initially 1 reviewer; comparison with 2 reviewers. Reviewer can't check 2 requests concurrently.\n- Timing: checks = 20 min fixed, requests arrive every 30 min\n- Assumptions: ignore breaks, rework, priority overrides\n\nI need to activate the skill and then identify the first consequential SDCPN construction decision without conducting an interview.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MQTMGJ5FSWN8Z23FMKEW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:36.588Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01H9Apr8tPHiaMypkThs7FVJ", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MQTMGJ5FSWN8Z23FMKEW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:36.609Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01H9Apr8tPHiaMypkThs7FVJ", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\": \"sdcpn-modelling", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MQTMGJ5FSWN8Z23FMKEW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:36.666Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01H9Apr8tPHiaMypkThs7FVJ", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MQTMGJ5FSWN8Z23FMKEW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:36.670Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MQTMGJ5FSWN8Z23FMKEW", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3562, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced87EdK57cRGNF616fCn", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to:\n1. Use the supplied account as complete modelling input\n2. Not interview them\n3. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n4. Don't mutate a net\n\nThey've supplied a complete operational process account for a comparison purpose: one reviewer vs two reviewer scenarios.\n\nLet me activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first, as instructed in the universal elicitation role for SDCPN work.\n\nThe account describes:\n- Purpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two\n- Boundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection\n- Process: submission → reviewer reserves + checks (20 min) → records outcome (approved/rejected, determined by eligibility rule in request data) → releases reviewer → request leaves\n- Resources: initially 1 reviewer; comparison with 2 reviewers. Reviewer can't check 2 requests concurrently.\n- Timing: checks = 20 min fixed, requests arrive every 30 min\n- Assumptions: ignore breaks, rework, priority overrides\n\nI need to activate the skill and then identify the first consequential SDCPN construction decision without conducting an interview.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01H9Apr8tPHiaMypkThs7FVJ", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2635, + "output": 333, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 2968, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0026349999999999998, + "output": 0.001665, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.0043 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:36.766Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to:\n1. Use the supplied account as complete modelling input\n2. Not interview them\n3. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n4. Don't mutate a net\n\nThey've supplied a complete operational process account for a comparison purpose: one reviewer vs two reviewer scenarios.\n\nLet me activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first, as instructed in the universal elicitation role for SDCPN work.\n\nThe account describes:\n- Purpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two\n- Boundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection\n- Process: submission → reviewer reserves + checks (20 min) → records outcome (approved/rejected, determined by eligibility rule in request data) → releases reviewer → request leaves\n- Resources: initially 1 reviewer; comparison with 2 reviewers. Reviewer can't check 2 requests concurrently.\n- Timing: checks = 20 min fixed, requests arrive every 30 min\n- Assumptions: ignore breaks, rework, priority overrides\n\nI need to activate the skill and then identify the first consequential SDCPN construction decision without conducting an interview.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01H9Apr8tPHiaMypkThs7FVJ", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2635, + "output": 333, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 2968, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0026349999999999998, + "output": 0.001665, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.0043 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 271 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284133216, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced87EdK57cRGNF616fCn", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MQTMGJ5FSWN8Z23FMKEW", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:36.766Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01H9Apr8tPHiaMypkThs7FVJ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MQTMGJ5FSWN8Z23FMKEW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:36.768Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01H9Apr8tPHiaMypkThs7FVJ", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284136771 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MQTMGJ5FSWN8Z23FMKEW", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:36.771Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01H9Apr8tPHiaMypkThs7FVJ", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284136771 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MQTMGJ5FSWN8Z23FMKEW", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:36.771Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01H9Apr8tPHiaMypkThs7FVJ", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 4, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MQTMGJ5FSWN8Z23FMKEW", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:36.772Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MQTMGJ5FSWN8Z23FMKEW", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to:\n1. Use the supplied account as complete modelling input\n2. Not interview them\n3. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n4. Don't mutate a net\n\nThey've supplied a complete operational process account for a comparison purpose: one reviewer vs two reviewer scenarios.\n\nLet me activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first, as instructed in the universal elicitation role for SDCPN work.\n\nThe account describes:\n- Purpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two\n- Boundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection\n- Process: submission → reviewer reserves + checks (20 min) → records outcome (approved/rejected, determined by eligibility rule in request data) → releases reviewer → request leaves\n- Resources: initially 1 reviewer; comparison with 2 reviewers. Reviewer can't check 2 requests concurrently.\n- Timing: checks = 20 min fixed, requests arrive every 30 min\n- Assumptions: ignore breaks, rework, priority overrides\n\nI need to activate the skill and then identify the first consequential SDCPN construction decision without conducting an interview.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01H9Apr8tPHiaMypkThs7FVJ", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2635, + "output": 333, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 2968, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0026349999999999998, + "output": 0.001665, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.0043 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 271 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284133216, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced87EdK57cRGNF616fCn", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01H9Apr8tPHiaMypkThs7FVJ", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284136771 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:36.772Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MVA5Z8AYHXFF6YGEWQVC", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:36.773Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MVA5Z8AYHXFF6YGEWQVC", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to:\n1. Use the supplied account as complete modelling input\n2. Not interview them\n3. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n4. Don't mutate a net\n\nThey've supplied a complete operational process account for a comparison purpose: one reviewer vs two reviewer scenarios.\n\nLet me activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first, as instructed in the universal elicitation role for SDCPN work.\n\nThe account describes:\n- Purpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two\n- Boundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection\n- Process: submission → reviewer reserves + checks (20 min) → records outcome (approved/rejected, determined by eligibility rule in request data) → releases reviewer → request leaves\n- Resources: initially 1 reviewer; comparison with 2 reviewers. Reviewer can't check 2 requests concurrently.\n- Timing: checks = 20 min fixed, requests arrive every 30 min\n- Assumptions: ignore breaks, rework, priority overrides\n\nI need to activate the skill and then identify the first consequential SDCPN construction decision without conducting an interview.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01H9Apr8tPHiaMypkThs7FVJ", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01H9Apr8tPHiaMypkThs7FVJ", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:36.773Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284136775 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MVA5Z8AYHXFF6YGEWQVC", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:37.450Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MVA5Z8AYHXFF6YGEWQVC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:37.450Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "The", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MVA5Z8AYHXFF6YGEWQVC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:38.452Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " skill instructions tell me that I'm in the \"construct-only execution\" branch because the user supplied complete", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MVA5Z8AYHXFF6YGEWQVC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:38.452Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " modelling input and said not to interview. The instructions say:\n\n\"Use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md`", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MVA5Z8AYHXFF6YGEWQVC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:38.452Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\"\n\nHowever, the user also said \"Stop after stating", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MVA5Z8AYHXFF6YGEWQVC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:39.462Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\" This means I should:", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MVA5Z8AYHXFF6YGEWQVC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:39.462Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "\n1. Identify and state the first consequential construction decision\n2. NOT actually construct or mutate a net\n3. Stop", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MVA5Z8AYHXFF6YGEWQVC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:39.462Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " there\n\nSo I need to:\n1. Assemble the workpiece from the supplied account\n2. Read the pn-construction.md resource to understand what construction decisions exist\n3. Identify the first consequ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MVA5Z8AYHXFF6YGEWQVC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:39.462Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "ential one\n4. State it\n5. Stop\n\nLet me read the construction resource first to understand what the first consequential decision would be.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MVA5Z8AYHXFF6YGEWQVC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:40.051Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "The skill instructions tell me that I'm in the \"construct-only execution\" branch because the user supplied complete modelling input and said not to interview. The instructions say:\n\n\"Use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\"\n\nHowever, the user also said \"Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\" This means I should:\n1. Identify and state the first consequential construction decision\n2. NOT actually construct or mutate a net\n3. Stop there\n\nSo I need to:\n1. Assemble the workpiece from the supplied account\n2. Read the pn-construction.md resource to understand what construction decisions exist\n3. Identify the first consequential one\n4. State it\n5. Stop\n\nLet me read the construction resource first to understand what the first consequential decision would be.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MVA5Z8AYHXFF6YGEWQVC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:40.052Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01EXvqRQzirwvK4G7JXbtYmz", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MVA5Z8AYHXFF6YGEWQVC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:40.052Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01EXvqRQzirwvK4G7JXbtYmz", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\": \"/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MVA5Z8AYHXFF6YGEWQVC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:40.053Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01EXvqRQzirwvK4G7JXbtYmz", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MVA5Z8AYHXFF6YGEWQVC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:40.053Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MVA5Z8AYHXFF6YGEWQVC", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3281, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced87Vp7wg3HdHGgNCrxd", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The skill instructions tell me that I'm in the \"construct-only execution\" branch because the user supplied complete modelling input and said not to interview. The instructions say:\n\n\"Use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\"\n\nHowever, the user also said \"Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\" This means I should:\n1. Identify and state the first consequential construction decision\n2. NOT actually construct or mutate a net\n3. Stop there\n\nSo I need to:\n1. Assemble the workpiece from the supplied account\n2. Read the pn-construction.md resource to understand what construction decisions exist\n3. Identify the first consequential one\n4. State it\n5. Stop\n\nLet me read the construction resource first to understand what the first consequential decision would be.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01EXvqRQzirwvK4G7JXbtYmz", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 354, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4140, + "totalTokens": 4506, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.00177, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.005175, + "total": 0.006957 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:40.054Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The skill instructions tell me that I'm in the \"construct-only execution\" branch because the user supplied complete modelling input and said not to interview. The instructions say:\n\n\"Use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\"\n\nHowever, the user also said \"Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\" This means I should:\n1. Identify and state the first consequential construction decision\n2. NOT actually construct or mutate a net\n3. Stop there\n\nSo I need to:\n1. Assemble the workpiece from the supplied account\n2. Read the pn-construction.md resource to understand what construction decisions exist\n3. Identify the first consequential one\n4. State it\n5. Stop\n\nLet me read the construction resource first to understand what the first consequential decision would be.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01EXvqRQzirwvK4G7JXbtYmz", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 354, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4140, + "totalTokens": 4506, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.00177, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.005175, + "total": 0.006957 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 259 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284136775, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced87Vp7wg3HdHGgNCrxd", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MVA5Z8AYHXFF6YGEWQVC", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:40.054Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01EXvqRQzirwvK4G7JXbtYmz", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MVA5Z8AYHXFF6YGEWQVC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:40.055Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01EXvqRQzirwvK4G7JXbtYmz", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284140056 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MVA5Z8AYHXFF6YGEWQVC", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:40.056Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01EXvqRQzirwvK4G7JXbtYmz", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284140056 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MVA5Z8AYHXFF6YGEWQVC", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:40.057Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01EXvqRQzirwvK4G7JXbtYmz", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + } + }, + "durationMs": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MVA5Z8AYHXFF6YGEWQVC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:40.058Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MVA5Z8AYHXFF6YGEWQVC", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The skill instructions tell me that I'm in the \"construct-only execution\" branch because the user supplied complete modelling input and said not to interview. The instructions say:\n\n\"Use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\"\n\nHowever, the user also said \"Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\" This means I should:\n1. Identify and state the first consequential construction decision\n2. NOT actually construct or mutate a net\n3. Stop there\n\nSo I need to:\n1. Assemble the workpiece from the supplied account\n2. Read the pn-construction.md resource to understand what construction decisions exist\n3. Identify the first consequential one\n4. State it\n5. Stop\n\nLet me read the construction resource first to understand what the first consequential decision would be.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01EXvqRQzirwvK4G7JXbtYmz", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 354, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4140, + "totalTokens": 4506, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.00177, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.005175, + "total": 0.006957 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 259 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284136775, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced87Vp7wg3HdHGgNCrxd", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01EXvqRQzirwvK4G7JXbtYmz", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284140056 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:40.058Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:40.058Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to:\n1. Use the supplied account as complete modelling input\n2. Not interview them\n3. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n4. Don't mutate a net\n\nThey've supplied a complete operational process account for a comparison purpose: one reviewer vs two reviewer scenarios.\n\nLet me activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first, as instructed in the universal elicitation role for SDCPN work.\n\nThe account describes:\n- Purpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two\n- Boundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection\n- Process: submission → reviewer reserves + checks (20 min) → records outcome (approved/rejected, determined by eligibility rule in request data) → releases reviewer → request leaves\n- Resources: initially 1 reviewer; comparison with 2 reviewers. Reviewer can't check 2 requests concurrently.\n- Timing: checks = 20 min fixed, requests arrive every 30 min\n- Assumptions: ignore breaks, rework, priority overrides\n\nI need to activate the skill and then identify the first consequential SDCPN construction decision without conducting an interview.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01H9Apr8tPHiaMypkThs7FVJ", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01H9Apr8tPHiaMypkThs7FVJ", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The skill instructions tell me that I'm in the \"construct-only execution\" branch because the user supplied complete modelling input and said not to interview. The instructions say:\n\n\"Use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\"\n\nHowever, the user also said \"Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\" This means I should:\n1. Identify and state the first consequential construction decision\n2. NOT actually construct or mutate a net\n3. Stop there\n\nSo I need to:\n1. Assemble the workpiece from the supplied account\n2. Read the pn-construction.md resource to understand what construction decisions exist\n3. Identify the first consequential one\n4. State it\n5. Stop\n\nLet me read the construction resource first to understand what the first consequential decision would be.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01EXvqRQzirwvK4G7JXbtYmz", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01EXvqRQzirwvK4G7JXbtYmz", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:40.058Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284140060 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 57, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:40.659Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 58, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:40.660Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "Good", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 59, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:41.661Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ". Now I have the construction guidance. The user's account supplies:\n\n**Process spine:**\n- Request", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 60, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:41.661Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " arrives (at 30-min intervals)\n- Reviewer reserves the request", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 61, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:41.661Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " (and acquires one available reviewer)\n- Reviewer checks request for 20 minutes\n- Outcome (", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 62, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:41.661Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "approved/rejected) is determined by eligibility rule in request data and recorded\n- Reviewer is released", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 63, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:42.938Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "\n- Request (with outcome) leaves\n\n**Resources:**\n- Reviewers: initially 1 (scenario:", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 64, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:42.938Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " compare with 2)\n- Requests: arrive one at a time every 30 minutes\n\n**Key constraints:**\n- A", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 65, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:42.938Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n- Deterministic branching (eligibility rule determines outcome)\n\n**", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 66, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:43.945Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "Exclusions:**\n- No reviewer breaks, rework, priority overrides\n\nNow,", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 67, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:43.945Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " the first consequential SDCPN construction decision in this domain would be about", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 68, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:43.945Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " how to represent the reviewer resource and the comparison between 1-reviewer and 2-reviewer scenarios", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 69, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:43.945Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ".\n\nAccording to the construction principles, this involves:\n1. **Resource representation**: How to model available reviewers (cont", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 70, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:45.246Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "ended resource pattern)\n2. **Scenario parameterization**: How the comparison between 1 and 2 reviewers is represented\n\nThe first consequential decision is", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 71, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:45.246Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ": **Should the number of available reviewers be represented as an initial-marking parameter (allowing scenario comparison", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 72, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:45.246Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " by changing that parameter), or as a hardcoded initial marking for two separate nets", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 73, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:46.273Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "?**\n\nThe construction pattern for contended resources says: \"Hold available instances in shared resource", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 74, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:46.273Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 75, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:46.273Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " use them while held...\"\n\nFor a fair comparison and reusability, the standard approach would", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 76, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:46.273Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " be to parameterize the initial count of reviewer tokens. This is the first consequential decision because it", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 77, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:46.811Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " determines whether the model is scenario-agnostic or requires two separate nets.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 78, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:46.811Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "Good. Now I have the construction guidance. The user's account supplies:\n\n**Process spine:**\n- Request arrives (at 30-min intervals)\n- Reviewer reserves the request (and acquires one available reviewer)\n- Reviewer checks request for 20 minutes\n- Outcome (approved/rejected) is determined by eligibility rule in request data and recorded\n- Reviewer is released\n- Request (with outcome) leaves\n\n**Resources:**\n- Reviewers: initially 1 (scenario: compare with 2)\n- Requests: arrive one at a time every 30 minutes\n\n**Key constraints:**\n- A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n- Deterministic branching (eligibility rule determines outcome)\n\n**Exclusions:**\n- No reviewer breaks, rework, priority overrides\n\nNow, the first consequential SDCPN construction decision in this domain would be about how to represent the reviewer resource and the comparison between 1-reviewer and 2-reviewer scenarios.\n\nAccording to the construction principles, this involves:\n1. **Resource representation**: How to model available reviewers (contended resource pattern)\n2. **Scenario parameterization**: How the comparison between 1 and 2 reviewers is represented\n\nThe first consequential decision is: **Should the number of available reviewers be represented as an initial-marking parameter (allowing scenario comparison by changing that parameter), or as a hardcoded initial marking for two separate nets?**\n\nThe construction pattern for contended resources says: \"Hold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held...\"\n\nFor a fair comparison and reusability, the standard approach would be to parameterize the initial count of reviewer tokens. This is the first consequential decision because it determines whether the model is scenario-agnostic or requires two separate nets.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 79, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:46.812Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "From the supplied account, I have", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 80, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:47.817Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " a complete operational description. Let me assemble the workpiece and identify the first construction decision.\n\n```runbook", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 81, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:47.817Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "-ir\n# Approval-Turnaround Comparison: One vs Two Reviewers\n\n## Purpose", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 82, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:47.817Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "\nCompare approval turnaround time (submission to approval or rejection) under single-reviewer and two-reviewer resource states.\n\n##", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 83, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:47.817Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " Boundary\nOne request from submission through final approval or rejection.\n\n## Process spine\n1. Request arrives (external input,", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 84, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:49.042Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " one per 30 minutes)\n2. A reviewer becomes available and reserves the request\n3. Reviewer checks the request (fixed", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 85, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:49.042Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " 20 minutes)\n4. Reviewer records the outcome (approved or rejected) according to deterministic eligibility rule carried", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 86, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:49.042Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " in request data\n5. Reviewer releases; request leaves the boundary with its outcome\n\n## Resources and initial state\n- Requests: distinct", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 87, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:49.042Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " work items, unbounded arrival supply\n- Reviewers: consumable resource, initially 1 available (scenario: compare with 2)\n- Constraint: a reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n\n##", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 88, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:50.307Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " Logical rules and data\n- Branching: approved vs. rejected is deterministic from request data (no probability", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 89, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:50.307Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": ")\n- Release: reviewer becomes available after recording the outcome\n\n## Timing\n- Check duration: 20 minutes (fixed)\n- Request inter-arrival: 30 minutes (", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 90, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:50.307Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "fixed)\n- Setup, contention resolution, breaks, rework, priority overrides: excluded per scope", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 91, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:50.307Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " limits\n\n## Representation notes\n- The eligibility rule is recorded in request data; the model does not execute validation logic", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 92, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:51.600Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " itself\n- Comparison between scenarios (1 vs. 2 reviewers) will parameterize initial available-reviewer count\n```\n\n---\n\n## First", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 93, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:51.600Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " Consequential Construction Decision\n\n**How to represent the available-reviewer count for scenario comparison:**\n\nThe account requires modeling two", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 94, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:51.600Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " distinct resource states—one reviewer vs. two reviewers—to support the stated comparison purpose. The first consequential decision is whether the", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 95, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:52.624Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " number of available reviewers is represented as a **scalar parameter** (allowing both scenarios to use the same net with different initial values) or as separate **hardcoded initial", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 96, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:52.624Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " markings** (requiring two separate nets).\n\n**The decision:** Represent available reviewers as a parameter governing initial marking, so a", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 97, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:52.624Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " single net definition can be loaded with different parameter values to run both scenarios.\n\nThis is consequential because it determines whether the net is", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 98, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:52.624Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " reusable across the comparison scenarios or must be manually duplicated and edited for each case. The construction pattern for contended resources supports", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 99, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:53.347Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " this choice directly: hold available resource instances in shared state, acquired at work-start and released at completion", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 100, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:53.347Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": ".\n\nI stop here without mutating a net.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 101, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:53.347Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 13303, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced87jpz2XQVsBwqqLhqN", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good. Now I have the construction guidance. The user's account supplies:\n\n**Process spine:**\n- Request arrives (at 30-min intervals)\n- Reviewer reserves the request (and acquires one available reviewer)\n- Reviewer checks request for 20 minutes\n- Outcome (approved/rejected) is determined by eligibility rule in request data and recorded\n- Reviewer is released\n- Request (with outcome) leaves\n\n**Resources:**\n- Reviewers: initially 1 (scenario: compare with 2)\n- Requests: arrive one at a time every 30 minutes\n\n**Key constraints:**\n- A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n- Deterministic branching (eligibility rule determines outcome)\n\n**Exclusions:**\n- No reviewer breaks, rework, priority overrides\n\nNow, the first consequential SDCPN construction decision in this domain would be about how to represent the reviewer resource and the comparison between 1-reviewer and 2-reviewer scenarios.\n\nAccording to the construction principles, this involves:\n1. **Resource representation**: How to model available reviewers (contended resource pattern)\n2. **Scenario parameterization**: How the comparison between 1 and 2 reviewers is represented\n\nThe first consequential decision is: **Should the number of available reviewers be represented as an initial-marking parameter (allowing scenario comparison by changing that parameter), or as a hardcoded initial marking for two separate nets?**\n\nThe construction pattern for contended resources says: \"Hold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held...\"\n\nFor a fair comparison and reusability, the standard approach would be to parameterize the initial count of reviewer tokens. This is the first consequential decision because it determines whether the model is scenario-agnostic or requires two separate nets.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "From the supplied account, I have a complete operational description. Let me assemble the workpiece and identify the first construction decision.\n\n```runbook-ir\n# Approval-Turnaround Comparison: One vs Two Reviewers\n\n## Purpose\nCompare approval turnaround time (submission to approval or rejection) under single-reviewer and two-reviewer resource states.\n\n## Boundary\nOne request from submission through final approval or rejection.\n\n## Process spine\n1. Request arrives (external input, one per 30 minutes)\n2. A reviewer becomes available and reserves the request\n3. Reviewer checks the request (fixed 20 minutes)\n4. Reviewer records the outcome (approved or rejected) according to deterministic eligibility rule carried in request data\n5. Reviewer releases; request leaves the boundary with its outcome\n\n## Resources and initial state\n- Requests: distinct work items, unbounded arrival supply\n- Reviewers: consumable resource, initially 1 available (scenario: compare with 2)\n- Constraint: a reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n\n## Logical rules and data\n- Branching: approved vs. rejected is deterministic from request data (no probability)\n- Release: reviewer becomes available after recording the outcome\n\n## Timing\n- Check duration: 20 minutes (fixed)\n- Request inter-arrival: 30 minutes (fixed)\n- Setup, contention resolution, breaks, rework, priority overrides: excluded per scope limits\n\n## Representation notes\n- The eligibility rule is recorded in request data; the model does not execute validation logic itself\n- Comparison between scenarios (1 vs. 2 reviewers) will parameterize initial available-reviewer count\n```\n\n---\n\n## First Consequential Construction Decision\n\n**How to represent the available-reviewer count for scenario comparison:**\n\nThe account requires modeling two distinct resource states—one reviewer vs. two reviewers—to support the stated comparison purpose. The first consequential decision is whether the number of available reviewers is represented as a **scalar parameter** (allowing both scenarios to use the same net with different initial values) or as separate **hardcoded initial markings** (requiring two separate nets).\n\n**The decision:** Represent available reviewers as a parameter governing initial marking, so a single net definition can be loaded with different parameter values to run both scenarios.\n\nThis is consequential because it determines whether the net is reusable across the comparison scenarios or must be manually duplicated and edited for each case. The construction pattern for contended resources supports this choice directly: hold available resource instances in shared state, acquired at work-start and released at completion.\n\nI stop here without mutating a net." + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 13, + "output": 1000, + "cacheRead": 4140, + "cacheWrite": 2313, + "totalTokens": 7466, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000013, + "output": 0.005, + "cacheRead": 0.00041400000000000003, + "cacheWrite": 0.00289125, + "total": 0.008318250000000001 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 102, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:53.361Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good. Now I have the construction guidance. The user's account supplies:\n\n**Process spine:**\n- Request arrives (at 30-min intervals)\n- Reviewer reserves the request (and acquires one available reviewer)\n- Reviewer checks request for 20 minutes\n- Outcome (approved/rejected) is determined by eligibility rule in request data and recorded\n- Reviewer is released\n- Request (with outcome) leaves\n\n**Resources:**\n- Reviewers: initially 1 (scenario: compare with 2)\n- Requests: arrive one at a time every 30 minutes\n\n**Key constraints:**\n- A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n- Deterministic branching (eligibility rule determines outcome)\n\n**Exclusions:**\n- No reviewer breaks, rework, priority overrides\n\nNow, the first consequential SDCPN construction decision in this domain would be about how to represent the reviewer resource and the comparison between 1-reviewer and 2-reviewer scenarios.\n\nAccording to the construction principles, this involves:\n1. **Resource representation**: How to model available reviewers (contended resource pattern)\n2. **Scenario parameterization**: How the comparison between 1 and 2 reviewers is represented\n\nThe first consequential decision is: **Should the number of available reviewers be represented as an initial-marking parameter (allowing scenario comparison by changing that parameter), or as a hardcoded initial marking for two separate nets?**\n\nThe construction pattern for contended resources says: \"Hold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held...\"\n\nFor a fair comparison and reusability, the standard approach would be to parameterize the initial count of reviewer tokens. This is the first consequential decision because it determines whether the model is scenario-agnostic or requires two separate nets.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "From the supplied account, I have a complete operational description. Let me assemble the workpiece and identify the first construction decision.\n\n```runbook-ir\n# Approval-Turnaround Comparison: One vs Two Reviewers\n\n## Purpose\nCompare approval turnaround time (submission to approval or rejection) under single-reviewer and two-reviewer resource states.\n\n## Boundary\nOne request from submission through final approval or rejection.\n\n## Process spine\n1. Request arrives (external input, one per 30 minutes)\n2. A reviewer becomes available and reserves the request\n3. Reviewer checks the request (fixed 20 minutes)\n4. Reviewer records the outcome (approved or rejected) according to deterministic eligibility rule carried in request data\n5. Reviewer releases; request leaves the boundary with its outcome\n\n## Resources and initial state\n- Requests: distinct work items, unbounded arrival supply\n- Reviewers: consumable resource, initially 1 available (scenario: compare with 2)\n- Constraint: a reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n\n## Logical rules and data\n- Branching: approved vs. rejected is deterministic from request data (no probability)\n- Release: reviewer becomes available after recording the outcome\n\n## Timing\n- Check duration: 20 minutes (fixed)\n- Request inter-arrival: 30 minutes (fixed)\n- Setup, contention resolution, breaks, rework, priority overrides: excluded per scope limits\n\n## Representation notes\n- The eligibility rule is recorded in request data; the model does not execute validation logic itself\n- Comparison between scenarios (1 vs. 2 reviewers) will parameterize initial available-reviewer count\n```\n\n---\n\n## First Consequential Construction Decision\n\n**How to represent the available-reviewer count for scenario comparison:**\n\nThe account requires modeling two distinct resource states—one reviewer vs. two reviewers—to support the stated comparison purpose. The first consequential decision is whether the number of available reviewers is represented as a **scalar parameter** (allowing both scenarios to use the same net with different initial values) or as separate **hardcoded initial markings** (requiring two separate nets).\n\n**The decision:** Represent available reviewers as a parameter governing initial marking, so a single net definition can be loaded with different parameter values to run both scenarios.\n\nThis is consequential because it determines whether the net is reusable across the comparison scenarios or must be manually duplicated and edited for each case. The construction pattern for contended resources supports this choice directly: hold available resource instances in shared state, acquired at work-start and released at completion.\n\nI stop here without mutating a net." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 13, + "output": 1000, + "cacheRead": 4140, + "cacheWrite": 2313, + "totalTokens": 7466, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000013, + "output": 0.005, + "cacheRead": 0.00041400000000000003, + "cacheWrite": 0.00289125, + "total": 0.008318250000000001 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 413 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284140060, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced87jpz2XQVsBwqqLhqN", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 103, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:53.361Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0MYGTPGGG6Q8KVNP16YEH", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good. Now I have the construction guidance. The user's account supplies:\n\n**Process spine:**\n- Request arrives (at 30-min intervals)\n- Reviewer reserves the request (and acquires one available reviewer)\n- Reviewer checks request for 20 minutes\n- Outcome (approved/rejected) is determined by eligibility rule in request data and recorded\n- Reviewer is released\n- Request (with outcome) leaves\n\n**Resources:**\n- Reviewers: initially 1 (scenario: compare with 2)\n- Requests: arrive one at a time every 30 minutes\n\n**Key constraints:**\n- A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n- Deterministic branching (eligibility rule determines outcome)\n\n**Exclusions:**\n- No reviewer breaks, rework, priority overrides\n\nNow, the first consequential SDCPN construction decision in this domain would be about how to represent the reviewer resource and the comparison between 1-reviewer and 2-reviewer scenarios.\n\nAccording to the construction principles, this involves:\n1. **Resource representation**: How to model available reviewers (contended resource pattern)\n2. **Scenario parameterization**: How the comparison between 1 and 2 reviewers is represented\n\nThe first consequential decision is: **Should the number of available reviewers be represented as an initial-marking parameter (allowing scenario comparison by changing that parameter), or as a hardcoded initial marking for two separate nets?**\n\nThe construction pattern for contended resources says: \"Hold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held...\"\n\nFor a fair comparison and reusability, the standard approach would be to parameterize the initial count of reviewer tokens. This is the first consequential decision because it determines whether the model is scenario-agnostic or requires two separate nets.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "From the supplied account, I have a complete operational description. Let me assemble the workpiece and identify the first construction decision.\n\n```runbook-ir\n# Approval-Turnaround Comparison: One vs Two Reviewers\n\n## Purpose\nCompare approval turnaround time (submission to approval or rejection) under single-reviewer and two-reviewer resource states.\n\n## Boundary\nOne request from submission through final approval or rejection.\n\n## Process spine\n1. Request arrives (external input, one per 30 minutes)\n2. A reviewer becomes available and reserves the request\n3. Reviewer checks the request (fixed 20 minutes)\n4. Reviewer records the outcome (approved or rejected) according to deterministic eligibility rule carried in request data\n5. Reviewer releases; request leaves the boundary with its outcome\n\n## Resources and initial state\n- Requests: distinct work items, unbounded arrival supply\n- Reviewers: consumable resource, initially 1 available (scenario: compare with 2)\n- Constraint: a reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n\n## Logical rules and data\n- Branching: approved vs. rejected is deterministic from request data (no probability)\n- Release: reviewer becomes available after recording the outcome\n\n## Timing\n- Check duration: 20 minutes (fixed)\n- Request inter-arrival: 30 minutes (fixed)\n- Setup, contention resolution, breaks, rework, priority overrides: excluded per scope limits\n\n## Representation notes\n- The eligibility rule is recorded in request data; the model does not execute validation logic itself\n- Comparison between scenarios (1 vs. 2 reviewers) will parameterize initial available-reviewer count\n```\n\n---\n\n## First Consequential Construction Decision\n\n**How to represent the available-reviewer count for scenario comparison:**\n\nThe account requires modeling two distinct resource states—one reviewer vs. two reviewers—to support the stated comparison purpose. The first consequential decision is whether the number of available reviewers is represented as a **scalar parameter** (allowing both scenarios to use the same net with different initial values) or as separate **hardcoded initial markings** (requiring two separate nets).\n\n**The decision:** Represent available reviewers as a parameter governing initial marking, so a single net definition can be loaded with different parameter values to run both scenarios.\n\nThis is consequential because it determines whether the net is reusable across the comparison scenarios or must be manually duplicated and edited for each case. The construction pattern for contended resources supports this choice directly: hold available resource instances in shared state, acquired at work-start and released at completion.\n\nI stop here without mutating a net." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 13, + "output": 1000, + "cacheRead": 4140, + "cacheWrite": 2313, + "totalTokens": 7466, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000013, + "output": 0.005, + "cacheRead": 0.00041400000000000003, + "cacheWrite": 0.00289125, + "total": 0.008318250000000001 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 413 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284140060, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced87jpz2XQVsBwqqLhqN", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 104, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:53.361Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to:\n1. Use the supplied account as complete modelling input\n2. Not interview them\n3. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n4. Don't mutate a net\n\nThey've supplied a complete operational process account for a comparison purpose: one reviewer vs two reviewer scenarios.\n\nLet me activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first, as instructed in the universal elicitation role for SDCPN work.\n\nThe account describes:\n- Purpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two\n- Boundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection\n- Process: submission → reviewer reserves + checks (20 min) → records outcome (approved/rejected, determined by eligibility rule in request data) → releases reviewer → request leaves\n- Resources: initially 1 reviewer; comparison with 2 reviewers. Reviewer can't check 2 requests concurrently.\n- Timing: checks = 20 min fixed, requests arrive every 30 min\n- Assumptions: ignore breaks, rework, priority overrides\n\nI need to activate the skill and then identify the first consequential SDCPN construction decision without conducting an interview.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01H9Apr8tPHiaMypkThs7FVJ", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2635, + "output": 333, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 2968, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0026349999999999998, + "output": 0.001665, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.0043 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 271 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284133216, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced87EdK57cRGNF616fCn", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01H9Apr8tPHiaMypkThs7FVJ", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284136771 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The skill instructions tell me that I'm in the \"construct-only execution\" branch because the user supplied complete modelling input and said not to interview. The instructions say:\n\n\"Use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\"\n\nHowever, the user also said \"Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\" This means I should:\n1. Identify and state the first consequential construction decision\n2. NOT actually construct or mutate a net\n3. Stop there\n\nSo I need to:\n1. Assemble the workpiece from the supplied account\n2. Read the pn-construction.md resource to understand what construction decisions exist\n3. Identify the first consequential one\n4. State it\n5. Stop\n\nLet me read the construction resource first to understand what the first consequential decision would be.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01EXvqRQzirwvK4G7JXbtYmz", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 354, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4140, + "totalTokens": 4506, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.00177, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.005175, + "total": 0.006957 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 259 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284136775, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced87Vp7wg3HdHGgNCrxd", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01EXvqRQzirwvK4G7JXbtYmz", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284140056 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good. Now I have the construction guidance. The user's account supplies:\n\n**Process spine:**\n- Request arrives (at 30-min intervals)\n- Reviewer reserves the request (and acquires one available reviewer)\n- Reviewer checks request for 20 minutes\n- Outcome (approved/rejected) is determined by eligibility rule in request data and recorded\n- Reviewer is released\n- Request (with outcome) leaves\n\n**Resources:**\n- Reviewers: initially 1 (scenario: compare with 2)\n- Requests: arrive one at a time every 30 minutes\n\n**Key constraints:**\n- A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n- Deterministic branching (eligibility rule determines outcome)\n\n**Exclusions:**\n- No reviewer breaks, rework, priority overrides\n\nNow, the first consequential SDCPN construction decision in this domain would be about how to represent the reviewer resource and the comparison between 1-reviewer and 2-reviewer scenarios.\n\nAccording to the construction principles, this involves:\n1. **Resource representation**: How to model available reviewers (contended resource pattern)\n2. **Scenario parameterization**: How the comparison between 1 and 2 reviewers is represented\n\nThe first consequential decision is: **Should the number of available reviewers be represented as an initial-marking parameter (allowing scenario comparison by changing that parameter), or as a hardcoded initial marking for two separate nets?**\n\nThe construction pattern for contended resources says: \"Hold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held...\"\n\nFor a fair comparison and reusability, the standard approach would be to parameterize the initial count of reviewer tokens. This is the first consequential decision because it determines whether the model is scenario-agnostic or requires two separate nets.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "From the supplied account, I have a complete operational description. Let me assemble the workpiece and identify the first construction decision.\n\n```runbook-ir\n# Approval-Turnaround Comparison: One vs Two Reviewers\n\n## Purpose\nCompare approval turnaround time (submission to approval or rejection) under single-reviewer and two-reviewer resource states.\n\n## Boundary\nOne request from submission through final approval or rejection.\n\n## Process spine\n1. Request arrives (external input, one per 30 minutes)\n2. A reviewer becomes available and reserves the request\n3. Reviewer checks the request (fixed 20 minutes)\n4. Reviewer records the outcome (approved or rejected) according to deterministic eligibility rule carried in request data\n5. Reviewer releases; request leaves the boundary with its outcome\n\n## Resources and initial state\n- Requests: distinct work items, unbounded arrival supply\n- Reviewers: consumable resource, initially 1 available (scenario: compare with 2)\n- Constraint: a reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n\n## Logical rules and data\n- Branching: approved vs. rejected is deterministic from request data (no probability)\n- Release: reviewer becomes available after recording the outcome\n\n## Timing\n- Check duration: 20 minutes (fixed)\n- Request inter-arrival: 30 minutes (fixed)\n- Setup, contention resolution, breaks, rework, priority overrides: excluded per scope limits\n\n## Representation notes\n- The eligibility rule is recorded in request data; the model does not execute validation logic itself\n- Comparison between scenarios (1 vs. 2 reviewers) will parameterize initial available-reviewer count\n```\n\n---\n\n## First Consequential Construction Decision\n\n**How to represent the available-reviewer count for scenario comparison:**\n\nThe account requires modeling two distinct resource states—one reviewer vs. two reviewers—to support the stated comparison purpose. The first consequential decision is whether the number of available reviewers is represented as a **scalar parameter** (allowing both scenarios to use the same net with different initial values) or as separate **hardcoded initial markings** (requiring two separate nets).\n\n**The decision:** Represent available reviewers as a parameter governing initial marking, so a single net definition can be loaded with different parameter values to run both scenarios.\n\nThis is consequential because it determines whether the net is reusable across the comparison scenarios or must be manually duplicated and edited for each case. The construction pattern for contended resources supports this choice directly: hold available resource instances in shared state, acquired at work-start and released at completion.\n\nI stop here without mutating a net." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 13, + "output": 1000, + "cacheRead": 4140, + "cacheWrite": 2313, + "totalTokens": 7466, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000013, + "output": 0.005, + "cacheRead": 0.00041400000000000003, + "cacheWrite": 0.00289125, + "total": 0.008318250000000001 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 413 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284140060, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced87jpz2XQVsBwqqLhqN", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 105, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:53.362Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 20165, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 106, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:53.363Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0MQSR25HBFTMNE4V4QDF2", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0MQTEJ09B7CPHKS3KVQR1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 107, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:53.363Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0MQSP9Y1WRMKH0AB28P9A", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "259dde634d61b4e9069d0cdae8ba59d0415500e7d87301543e5d8f221da39be6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 108, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:35:53.363Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "d2d42344c40ddeb2471eeeba437032079bd2c7083afdbc2f9de5e823f841d5b8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "ebec2ac5faab6cbbbe26eeeebc2d7ac0ba7dc637fd43ea9b5917f8e0277f5515", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "c7cb5b2222b0d1b5aff861c4056f41ba8825aca284ec774d8e4f0fbf12807314", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "321f8405c12374315d61caf466001d6b4b5cf68b04325df77a7948daaa680de1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/scenarios.json": "1844df940b8de9d10d28e9537f966920aba581b36956a9ac26a3767824ca96cb", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/protocol.md": "ef1443bb02c6c26d4ded6edf9e023579bc32cdc394f90490edfb34eaf32b8ed2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md": "8cd2749c8292f01045ab4282fc7248c07046cecaf14a586a9ef286e2876cf8bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md": "82b035268c07cc8ee4736b5ffdd392c8f153793d2ca6b9ed57271c9b6146de10", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md": "8826b85d32d6c24fbc8f678ec394600676ec61c4a0b83d0a9cfa16be87fc5d76", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "1a2417cc5f9649d459c5efbc87cd3242db99a9717622a6d86073c72835818865" + }, + "promptSelection": { + "candidateCorePromptIncluded": true, + "v3SdcpnAppendIncluded": true, + "legacyCorePromptIncluded": false, + "legacyRoleMarkerIncluded": false, + "initialSystemPromptSha256": "ad472c3919f1857f1f5f02f83bf0adb83c4795808e44f2b58813b158585b61f7" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "candidateCorePrompt": "6a458c0bbbc9dee5b4454a54b032818227ab681ba9f7beaa60d4fe9628f6eb41", + "v3SdcpnAppend": "73cac46487d33051a90cc487ea7abfc11fec4b049af11a108396ec08d44569fb", + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S2-packaged-r2.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S2-packaged-r2.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..74a77d9c7a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S2-packaged-r2.json @@ -0,0 +1,3891 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v3-packaged-s2-a48e6a38", + "phase": "paid", + "instrumentVersion": "v3", + "candidate": "packaged", + "scenarioId": "S2", + "scenario": { + "title": "Adequate construct-only request", + "prompt": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them.", + "stopAfter": "The first consequential construction decision.", + "expected": "Enter construction guidance without loading universal elicitation or asking a question." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "```runbook-ir\n# Process-Model Workpiece: Approval Request Processing\n\n## Purpose and posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\n\nCompare request approval turnaround time under single-reviewer and dual-reviewer configurations.\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n\nOne request from submission through approval or rejection and exit. Comparison horizon: request arrival through completion.\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\nDoes not represent reviewer breaks, rework, priority overrides.\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n- **Trigger:** Request submission\n- **Initial state:** \n - Scenario A: One available reviewer\n - Scenario B: Two available reviewers\n- **Initial request state:** none (arrivals from outside the system boundary)\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n**Flowing things:** Request items (each carries eligibility data deterministically determining approval or rejection outcome)\n\n**Resources:** Reviewers (exclusive-use resource; each reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently)\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\n**Reserve request and reviewer**\n- Input: incoming request (consumed/admitted)\n- Resource: one available reviewer (reserved, held until release)\n- Output: request in review with occupied reviewer\n- Duration: instantaneous\n\n**Check request**\n- Input: request with eligibility data (read; data remains with request)\n- Resource: occupied reviewer (held)\n- Duration: 20 minutes (fixed)\n- Output: request with outcome (approved or rejected, deterministically selected from request data)\n\n**Record outcome and release reviewer**\n- Input: checked request with outcome (consumed/completed)\n- Resource: occupied reviewer (released back to available pool)\n- Output: approved or rejected request exits the boundary\n- Duration: instantaneous\n\n### Case and process spine\n\n#### Primary case: Request approval workflow\n\n**Trigger:** Request arrives at submission boundary\n\n**Ordered account:**\n1. Request and one available reviewer are reserved together\n2. Reviewer checks request for 20 minutes (occupying that reviewer)\n3. Documented eligibility rule selects outcome (approved or rejected) from request data\n4. Outcome is recorded; reviewer is released to available pool\n5. Request (approved or rejected) exits the boundary\n\n**Branches:** Two mutually exclusive outcomes (approved or rejected) after check completes, determined by eligibility rule applied to request data\n\n**Waiting:** Request cannot proceed until a reviewer is available; waiting occurs at the reserve-request-and-reviewer step when all reviewers are occupied\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n- **Check duration:** 20 minutes (constant, not stochastic)\n- **Request arrivals:** One at a time, every 30 minutes (constant inter-arrival time; external to boundary)\n- **Outcomes:** Deterministic selection by documented eligibility rule (no stochasticity in branching)\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\n- **Exclusivity:** A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n- **Deterministic outcome:** Eligibility rule uniquely determines each outcome; no policy override or discretion\n- **No recovery or rework:** Recorded outcome is final; request exits after recording\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\nFrom supplied account:\n- \"a reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer\" → reviewer acquisition is part of case admission\n- \"checks it for 20 minutes\" → 20 minutes is the sole time input; no variation stated\n- \"records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule\" → outcome is deterministic from request data\n- \"Recording the outcome releases the reviewer\" → release point is at outcome recording\n- \"requests are distinct work items\" → each request is a separate, independent case instance\n- \"A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\" → reviewer is an exclusive-use resource during check\n- \"the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request\" → branching is non-probabilistic, data-driven\n\n### Normalized account (working account)\n\nA single request case:\n1. Request arrives; reserves one available reviewer\n2. Reviewer checks request for 20 minutes\n3. Deterministic outcome (approved or rejected) is recorded based on request data\n4. Reviewer is released\n5. Request exits\n\nScenario variations: same process structure, but initial reviewer availability is 1 or 2.\n\n## Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nNone required; all material facts are supplied.\n\n### Deferred\n\n**Not deferred, but construction will require decision:** How to represent the two comparison scenarios (single net with parameterized reviewer count vs. two separate nets). This is not a workpiece gap but a construction representation choice.\n\n## Construction review\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\nTwo representations are possible:\n1. **Two separate nets:** One net with initial reviewer availability = 1; a second net with initial reviewer availability = 2. Each can be constructed, simulated, and compared independently.\n2. **Single parameterized net:** One net with a parameter for reviewer availability, initialized to 1 or 2 by the scenario. Single net structure, multiple simulations.\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n- Full operational description of the request approval process\n- Clear resource contention model (reviewer exclusivity)\n- Deterministic outcome branching rule\n- Timing (20 min check, 30 min inter-arrival)\n- Two distinct comparison scenarios (initial reviewer count)\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\nNone for workpiece purposes. All operational facts supplied.\n\n### Net status and tool evidence\n\nNot yet constructed. Awaiting construction decision on scenario representation.\n```\n\n---\n\n## First Consequential SDCPN Construction Decision\n\n**Question:** Should the model represent the two approval turnaround comparison scenarios (1 vs. 2 reviewers) as:\n\n1. **Two separate nets** — one with reviewer availability initialized to 1, the second with availability initialized to 2, each built and simulated independently to compare their turnaround times, or\n\n2. **A single parameterized net** — one net structure with a numeric parameter controlling initial reviewer availability, simulated twice under different parameter values?\n\n**Why this is consequential:** The choice affects whether to construct a single stable net or to maintain two, whether parameterization is used, and how the comparison simulations will later be run. Both are valid in Petrinaut; the choice rests on the comparison workflow preference.\n\nThe workpiece is complete and ready to receive either direction.", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DvYPKfT9R6qKjq1dGpRfcK", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "toolu_013vmvbmBayzxhXJ84W9DDfJ", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md" + }, + "output": "# Process-Model Workpiece and Recording Contract\n\nThe workpiece is the shared, recoverable operational account. Elicitation and revision maintain it; construction consumes it. The transcript remains evidence, not the primary model.\n\nFollow the person's thread during conversation and file material into the workpiece afterward. Its headings are recording homes, not question order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose, while keeping consequential omissions visible.\n\n## Recording distinctions\n\nUse these distinctions wherever they carry information; they are not mandatory labels on every sentence:\n\n- **Expert evidence** — What the person said, preserving consequential vocabulary, hedges, context, and source regime.\n- **Working account** — The current normalized operational description accepted for use.\n- **Agent inference** — An interpretation of evidence, visibly attributed to the agent.\n- **Assumed** — A value or structure proposed by the agent, with its reason, consequence, and route to checking.\n- **Unknown** — Asked, but the person does not know.\n- **Not yet asked** — Relevant and identified, but not yet addressed.\n- **Deferred** — Left for later, with why it matters and a named source or route to an answer.\n- **Declined** — The person chose not to answer or include it.\n- **Conflict** — Accounts cannot yet be used together; preserve both and what could distinguish them.\n- **Correction** — A current account that replaces an earlier one, retaining enough history to explain the change without leaving both active.\n- **Contextual coexistence** — Different accounts apply under different people, times, modes, directions, policies, or operating conditions.\n- **Omitted** — Deliberately outside the model, with why the purpose permits the omission.\n- **Target loss** — Supported operational meaning the SDCPN or current tools cannot faithfully carry.\n\nEvidence and precision are independent. “About three hours” may be supported but coarse; an exact agent-supplied value may be precise-looking but unsupported.\n\nKeep one authoritative home for each active claim. Do not accumulate competing summaries. When a later statement differs, establish whether it is a correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before updating the working account.\n\n## Workpiece template\n\n```markdown\n# Process-Model Workpiece\n\n## Purpose and posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\n\n### Who will use it and how\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n\n### Available time and assumption appetite\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; record its ordering in the process spine.\n\n### Case and process spine\n\nGive the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary: what admits the case, what flows, which activities occur and in what order, what changes the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the work and resources, and what outcome or handoff ends it.\n\n#### Primary case: \n\n##### Trigger or admission\n\n##### Ordered account and references\n\n##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes\n\n##### Objective dependencies\n\n#### Additional or contrasting case: \n\nAdd only when a different case exposes consequential structure the primary case does not.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\n### Validation evidence and data sources\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\nKeep evidence beside affected process material where practical. Use this section for evidence spanning several parts of the account or whose relationship needs explanation.\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\n### Normalized account\n\n### Agent inferences and proposed structure\n\n## Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nFor each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked.\n\n### Unknown to the person\n\n### Not yet asked\n\n### Declined\n\n### Deferred and deposits\n\nFor each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it.\n\n### Ambiguities and conflicts\n\nPreserve alternatives and the evidence for each. Do not choose or average without support.\n\n### Corrections\n\nState the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active.\n\n### Contextual coexistence\n\nPreserve accounts differing by person, time, condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one.\n\n### Deliberate omissions and simplifications\n\nState what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong.\n\n## Construction review\n\nOpen this section only when construction begins.\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\n### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults\n\n### Questions reopened by construction\n\n### Target-representation and tooling losses\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\n### Net status and tool evidence\n```\n\n## Maintenance\n\n- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions.\n- Update the authoritative process spine when ordering or case behavior changes; reference activity and resource entries rather than duplicating their local details.\n- A restatement offered by the agent remains normalization even when accepted. Preserve exact evidence separately where origin matters.\n- For a genuine correction, update the active account and record what changed. For conflict or contextual coexistence, keep the alternatives and their unresolved or selecting conditions visible.\n- Remove irrelevant empty sections. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, or **Omitted** only when that state matters to later work.\n- If construction requires transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that boundary.\n- Record whether no construction was attempted, construction was blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone.\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "toolu_01UFZbgEp6irMUxeaMhrp7q1", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + }, + "output": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [ + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md", + "sha256": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9" + }, + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "sha256": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694" + } + ], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 2853, + "inputTokens": 2635, + "outputTokens": 348, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 2983, + "cost": 0.004375 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3260, + "inputTokens": 12, + "outputTokens": 376, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4155, + "totalTokens": 4543, + "cost": 0.00708575 + }, + { + "durationMs": 22862, + "inputTokens": 14, + "outputTokens": 1819, + "cacheReadTokens": 4155, + "cacheWriteTokens": 3786, + "totalTokens": 9774, + "cost": 0.014256999999999999 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 28975, + "inputTokens": 2661, + "outputTokens": 2543, + "cacheReadTokens": 4155, + "cacheWriteTokens": 7941, + "totalTokens": 17300, + "cost": 0.025717749999999998 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nUse the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them.\n\n## Assistant\n```runbook-ir\n# Process-Model Workpiece: Approval Request Processing\n\n## Purpose and posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\n\nCompare request approval turnaround time under single-reviewer and dual-reviewer configurations.\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n\nOne request from submission through approval or rejection and exit. Comparison horizon: request arrival through completion.\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\nDoes not represent reviewer breaks, rework, priority overrides.\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n- **Trigger:** Request submission\n- **Initial state:** \n - Scenario A: One available reviewer\n - Scenario B: Two available reviewers\n- **Initial request state:** none (arrivals from outside the system boundary)\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n**Flowing things:** Request items (each carries eligibility data deterministically determining approval or rejection outcome)\n\n**Resources:** Reviewers (exclusive-use resource; each reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently)\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\n**Reserve request and reviewer**\n- Input: incoming request (consumed/admitted)\n- Resource: one available reviewer (reserved, held until release)\n- Output: request in review with occupied reviewer\n- Duration: instantaneous\n\n**Check request**\n- Input: request with eligibility data (read; data remains with request)\n- Resource: occupied reviewer (held)\n- Duration: 20 minutes (fixed)\n- Output: request with outcome (approved or rejected, deterministically selected from request data)\n\n**Record outcome and release reviewer**\n- Input: checked request with outcome (consumed/completed)\n- Resource: occupied reviewer (released back to available pool)\n- Output: approved or rejected request exits the boundary\n- Duration: instantaneous\n\n### Case and process spine\n\n#### Primary case: Request approval workflow\n\n**Trigger:** Request arrives at submission boundary\n\n**Ordered account:**\n1. Request and one available reviewer are reserved together\n2. Reviewer checks request for 20 minutes (occupying that reviewer)\n3. Documented eligibility rule selects outcome (approved or rejected) from request data\n4. Outcome is recorded; reviewer is released to available pool\n5. Request (approved or rejected) exits the boundary\n\n**Branches:** Two mutually exclusive outcomes (approved or rejected) after check completes, determined by eligibility rule applied to request data\n\n**Waiting:** Request cannot proceed until a reviewer is available; waiting occurs at the reserve-request-and-reviewer step when all reviewers are occupied\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n- **Check duration:** 20 minutes (constant, not stochastic)\n- **Request arrivals:** One at a time, every 30 minutes (constant inter-arrival time; external to boundary)\n- **Outcomes:** Deterministic selection by documented eligibility rule (no stochasticity in branching)\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\n- **Exclusivity:** A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n- **Deterministic outcome:** Eligibility rule uniquely determines each outcome; no policy override or discretion\n- **No recovery or rework:** Recorded outcome is final; request exits after recording\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\nFrom supplied account:\n- \"a reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer\" → reviewer acquisition is part of case admission\n- \"checks it for 20 minutes\" → 20 minutes is the sole time input; no variation stated\n- \"records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule\" → outcome is deterministic from request data\n- \"Recording the outcome releases the reviewer\" → release point is at outcome recording\n- \"requests are distinct work items\" → each request is a separate, independent case instance\n- \"A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\" → reviewer is an exclusive-use resource during check\n- \"the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request\" → branching is non-probabilistic, data-driven\n\n### Normalized account (working account)\n\nA single request case:\n1. Request arrives; reserves one available reviewer\n2. Reviewer checks request for 20 minutes\n3. Deterministic outcome (approved or rejected) is recorded based on request data\n4. Reviewer is released\n5. Request exits\n\nScenario variations: same process structure, but initial reviewer availability is 1 or 2.\n\n## Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nNone required; all material facts are supplied.\n\n### Deferred\n\n**Not deferred, but construction will require decision:** How to represent the two comparison scenarios (single net with parameterized reviewer count vs. two separate nets). This is not a workpiece gap but a construction representation choice.\n\n## Construction review\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\nTwo representations are possible:\n1. **Two separate nets:** One net with initial reviewer availability = 1; a second net with initial reviewer availability = 2. Each can be constructed, simulated, and compared independently.\n2. **Single parameterized net:** One net with a parameter for reviewer availability, initialized to 1 or 2 by the scenario. Single net structure, multiple simulations.\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n- Full operational description of the request approval process\n- Clear resource contention model (reviewer exclusivity)\n- Deterministic outcome branching rule\n- Timing (20 min check, 30 min inter-arrival)\n- Two distinct comparison scenarios (initial reviewer count)\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\nNone for workpiece purposes. All operational facts supplied.\n\n### Net status and tool evidence\n\nNot yet constructed. Awaiting construction decision on scenario representation.\n```\n\n---\n\n## First Consequential SDCPN Construction Decision\n\n**Question:** Should the model represent the two approval turnaround comparison scenarios (1 vs. 2 reviewers) as:\n\n1. **Two separate nets** — one with reviewer availability initialized to 1, the second with availability initialized to 2, each built and simulated independently to compare their turnaround times, or\n\n2. **A single parameterized net** — one net structure with a numeric parameter controlling initial reviewer availability, simulated twice under different parameter values?\n\n**Why this is consequential:** The choice affects whether to construct a single stable net or to maintain two, whether parameterization is used, and how the comparison simulations will later be run. Both are valid in Petrinaut; the choice rests on the comparison workflow preference.\n\nThe workpiece is complete and ready to receive either direction.\n- tool activate_skill (toolu_01DvYPKfT9R6qKjq1dGpRfcK): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\\n\\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\\n\\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\\n\\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\\n\\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (toolu_013vmvbmBayzxhXJ84W9DDfJ): \"# Process-Model Workpiece and Recording Contract\\n\\nThe workpiece is the shared, recoverable operational account. Elicitation and revision maintain it; construction consumes it. The transcript remains evidence, not the primary model.\\n\\nFollow the person's thread during conversation and file material into the workpiece afterward. Its headings are recording homes, not question order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose, while keeping consequential omissions visible.\\n\\n## Recording distinctions\\n\\nUse these distinctions wherever they carry information; they are not mandatory labels on every sentence:\\n\\n- **Expert evidence** — What the person said, preserving consequential vocabulary, hedges, context, and source regime.\\n- **Working account** — The current normalized operational description accepted for use.\\n- **Agent inference** — An interpretation of evidence, visibly attributed to the agent.\\n- **Assumed** — A value or structure proposed by the agent, with its reason, consequence, and route to checking.\\n- **Unknown** — Asked, but the person does not know.\\n- **Not yet asked** — Relevant and identified, but not yet addressed.\\n- **Deferred** — Left for later, with why it matters and a named source or route to an answer.\\n- **Declined** — The person chose not to answer or include it.\\n- **Conflict** — Accounts cannot yet be used together; preserve both and what could distinguish them.\\n- **Correction** — A current account that replaces an earlier one, retaining enough history to explain the change without leaving both active.\\n- **Contextual coexistence** — Different accounts apply under different people, times, modes, directions, policies, or operating conditions.\\n- **Omitted** — Deliberately outside the model, with why the purpose permits the omission.\\n- **Target loss** — Supported operational meaning the SDCPN or current tools cannot faithfully carry.\\n\\nEvidence and precision are independent. “About three hours” may be supported but coarse; an exact agent-supplied value may be precise-looking but unsupported.\\n\\nKeep one authoritative home for each active claim. Do not accumulate competing summaries. When a later statement differs, establish whether it is a correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before updating the working account.\\n\\n## Workpiece template\\n\\n```markdown\\n# Process-Model Workpiece\\n\\n## Purpose and posture\\n\\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\\n\\n### Who will use it and how\\n\\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\\n\\n### Available time and assumption appetite\\n\\n### What the result must not claim\\n\\n## Operational account\\n\\n### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\\n\\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\\n\\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\\n\\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\\n\\nFor each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; record its ordering in the process spine.\\n\\n### Case and process spine\\n\\nGive the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary: what admits the case, what flows, which activities occur and in what order, what changes the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the work and resources, and what outcome or handoff ends it.\\n\\n#### Primary case: \\n\\n##### Trigger or admission\\n\\n##### Ordered account and references\\n\\n##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes\\n\\n##### Objective dependencies\\n\\n#### Additional or contrasting case: \\n\\nAdd only when a different case exposes consequential structure the primary case does not.\\n\\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\\n\\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\\n\\n### Validation evidence and data sources\\n\\n## Evidence and interpretation\\n\\nKeep evidence beside affected process material where practical. Use this section for evidence spanning several parts of the account or whose relationship needs explanation.\\n\\n### Exact expert evidence\\n\\n### Normalized account\\n\\n### Agent inferences and proposed structure\\n\\n## Open matters and authorship\\n\\n### Assumptions\\n\\nFor each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked.\\n\\n### Unknown to the person\\n\\n### Not yet asked\\n\\n### Declined\\n\\n### Deferred and deposits\\n\\nFor each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it.\\n\\n### Ambiguities and conflicts\\n\\nPreserve alternatives and the evidence for each. Do not choose or average without support.\\n\\n### Corrections\\n\\nState the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active.\\n\\n### Contextual coexistence\\n\\nPreserve accounts differing by person, time, condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one.\\n\\n### Deliberate omissions and simplifications\\n\\nState what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong.\\n\\n## Construction review\\n\\nOpen this section only when construction begins.\\n\\n### Candidate target structures\\n\\n### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults\\n\\n### Questions reopened by construction\\n\\n### Target-representation and tooling losses\\n\\n## Delivery status\\n\\n### What this workpiece currently supports\\n\\n### Consequential gaps\\n\\n### Net status and tool evidence\\n```\\n\\n## Maintenance\\n\\n- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions.\\n- Update the authoritative process spine when ordering or case behavior changes; reference activity and resource entries rather than duplicating their local details.\\n- A restatement offered by the agent remains normalization even when accepted. Preserve exact evidence separately where origin matters.\\n- For a genuine correction, update the active account and record what changed. For conflict or contextual coexistence, keep the alternatives and their unresolved or selecting conditions visible.\\n- Remove irrelevant empty sections. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, or **Omitted** only when that state matters to later work.\\n- If construction requires transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that boundary.\\n- Record whether no construction was attempted, construction was blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (toolu_01UFZbgEp6irMUxeaMhrp7q1): \"# SDCPN Construction\\n\\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\\n\\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\\n\\n## Construction boundary\\n\\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\\n\\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\\n\\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\\n\\n## Mapping principles\\n\\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\\n| --- | --- |\\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\\n\\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\\n\\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\\n\\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\\n\\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\\n\\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\\n\\n## Construction patterns\\n\\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\\n\\n### Timed work\\n\\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\\n\\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\\n\\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\\n\\n### Contended resource\\n\\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\\n\\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\\n\\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\\n\\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\\n\\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\\n\\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\\n\\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\\n\\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\\n\\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\\n\\n### Mode change\\n\\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\\n\\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\\n\\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\\n\\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\\n\\n### Spatial transfer\\n\\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\\n\\n### Hidden waiting\\n\\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\\n\\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\\n\\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\\n\\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\\n\\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\\n\\nNot acceptable:\\n\\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\\n\\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\\n\\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\\n\\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\\n\\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\\n\\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000051", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFGMFFDSllZRlI2R01YOVdIM1hGMVY2", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1F0QDA10BWS2KC43R9YN3FA", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QCKX5806AX15PS7D0JG9", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The user is asking me to:\n1. Use the account they've supplied as complete modelling input\n2. Not interview them\n3. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n4. Not mutate a net\n\nThey've provided:\n- Purpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two\n- Boundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection\n- Case spine (operational description): submission → reserve request and reviewer → check for 20 minutes → record outcome (approved/rejected based on documented rule) → release reviewer → exit\n- Resources and initial state: requests are work items; initially 1 available reviewer; comparison changes to 2; reviewer can't check 2 concurrently\n- Branch evidence: documented eligibility rule is deterministic based on request data\n- Timing: checks are 20 minutes; arrivals every 30 minutes\n- Assumptions and limits: ignore breaks, rework, priority overrides\n\nI need to:\n1. Activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first\n2. Develop a workpiece based on this account\n3. Identify the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n4. State it clearly\n5. Stop without building/mutating a net\n\nLet me activate the skill first.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DvYPKfT9R6qKjq1dGpRfcK", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 3 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good, I've activated the skill. Now I need to follow the construct-only branch because the user said \"Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me.\"\n\nAccording to the skill instructions:\n- I should use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input\n- Do not interview\n- Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`\n- Use mounted construction tools\n- If a consequential gap prevents construction, report it; don't ask\n\nThe user also says \"Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\"\n\nSo I need to:\n1. Develop a workpiece from the supplied account\n2. Identify the first consequential construction decision\n3. State it\n4. Stop without building anything\n\nLet me first read the workpiece template to understand how to structure this, then the pn-construction guidance to understand construction decisions.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_013vmvbmBayzxhXJ84W9DDfJ", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md" + }, + "output": "# Process-Model Workpiece and Recording Contract\n\nThe workpiece is the shared, recoverable operational account. Elicitation and revision maintain it; construction consumes it. The transcript remains evidence, not the primary model.\n\nFollow the person's thread during conversation and file material into the workpiece afterward. Its headings are recording homes, not question order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose, while keeping consequential omissions visible.\n\n## Recording distinctions\n\nUse these distinctions wherever they carry information; they are not mandatory labels on every sentence:\n\n- **Expert evidence** — What the person said, preserving consequential vocabulary, hedges, context, and source regime.\n- **Working account** — The current normalized operational description accepted for use.\n- **Agent inference** — An interpretation of evidence, visibly attributed to the agent.\n- **Assumed** — A value or structure proposed by the agent, with its reason, consequence, and route to checking.\n- **Unknown** — Asked, but the person does not know.\n- **Not yet asked** — Relevant and identified, but not yet addressed.\n- **Deferred** — Left for later, with why it matters and a named source or route to an answer.\n- **Declined** — The person chose not to answer or include it.\n- **Conflict** — Accounts cannot yet be used together; preserve both and what could distinguish them.\n- **Correction** — A current account that replaces an earlier one, retaining enough history to explain the change without leaving both active.\n- **Contextual coexistence** — Different accounts apply under different people, times, modes, directions, policies, or operating conditions.\n- **Omitted** — Deliberately outside the model, with why the purpose permits the omission.\n- **Target loss** — Supported operational meaning the SDCPN or current tools cannot faithfully carry.\n\nEvidence and precision are independent. “About three hours” may be supported but coarse; an exact agent-supplied value may be precise-looking but unsupported.\n\nKeep one authoritative home for each active claim. Do not accumulate competing summaries. When a later statement differs, establish whether it is a correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before updating the working account.\n\n## Workpiece template\n\n```markdown\n# Process-Model Workpiece\n\n## Purpose and posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\n\n### Who will use it and how\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n\n### Available time and assumption appetite\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; record its ordering in the process spine.\n\n### Case and process spine\n\nGive the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary: what admits the case, what flows, which activities occur and in what order, what changes the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the work and resources, and what outcome or handoff ends it.\n\n#### Primary case: \n\n##### Trigger or admission\n\n##### Ordered account and references\n\n##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes\n\n##### Objective dependencies\n\n#### Additional or contrasting case: \n\nAdd only when a different case exposes consequential structure the primary case does not.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\n### Validation evidence and data sources\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\nKeep evidence beside affected process material where practical. Use this section for evidence spanning several parts of the account or whose relationship needs explanation.\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\n### Normalized account\n\n### Agent inferences and proposed structure\n\n## Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nFor each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked.\n\n### Unknown to the person\n\n### Not yet asked\n\n### Declined\n\n### Deferred and deposits\n\nFor each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it.\n\n### Ambiguities and conflicts\n\nPreserve alternatives and the evidence for each. Do not choose or average without support.\n\n### Corrections\n\nState the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active.\n\n### Contextual coexistence\n\nPreserve accounts differing by person, time, condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one.\n\n### Deliberate omissions and simplifications\n\nState what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong.\n\n## Construction review\n\nOpen this section only when construction begins.\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\n### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults\n\n### Questions reopened by construction\n\n### Target-representation and tooling losses\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\n### Net status and tool evidence\n```\n\n## Maintenance\n\n- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions.\n- Update the authoritative process spine when ordering or case behavior changes; reference activity and resource entries rather than duplicating their local details.\n- A restatement offered by the agent remains normalization even when accepted. Preserve exact evidence separately where origin matters.\n- For a genuine correction, update the active account and record what changed. For conflict or contextual coexistence, keep the alternatives and their unresolved or selecting conditions visible.\n- Remove irrelevant empty sections. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, or **Omitted** only when that state matters to later work.\n- If construction requires transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that boundary.\n- Record whether no construction was attempted, construction was blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone.\n", + "durationMs": 1 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01UFZbgEp6irMUxeaMhrp7q1", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + }, + "output": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n", + "durationMs": 1 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good. Now I have the construction guidance. Let me develop the workpiece from the supplied account, then identify the first consequential construction decision.\n\nThe supplied account is quite complete:\n- Purpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer vs. two\n- Boundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection\n- Case spine: submission → reserve request and reviewer → check 20 minutes → record outcome (deterministic based on request data) → release reviewer → exit\n- Resources/initial state: requests are work items; 1 available reviewer initially (then 2 for comparison); reviewer can't check 2 concurrently\n- Branch evidence: eligibility rule is deterministic based on request data\n- Timing: checks 20 min; arrivals 30 min\n- Assumptions/limits: ignore breaks, rework, overrides\n\nThis is quite specific. Let me structure this into a workpiece to be clear about what we have.\n\nFirst consequential construction decision would likely be:\n1. How to represent the two scenarios (1 vs 2 reviewers) - separate nets or parameterized single net?\n2. How to model the deterministic branching outcome\n3. How to model the resource contention for reviewers\n4. How to model the external arrivals\n\nThe most fundamental decision is probably: should we construct two separate nets (one for each reviewer count) or a single parameterized net with a parameter controlling reviewer availability?\n\nThis is consequential because it affects the entire structure.\n\nLet me build the workpiece first.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "```runbook-ir\n# Process-Model Workpiece: Approval Request Processing\n\n## Purpose and posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\n\nCompare request approval turnaround time under single-reviewer and dual-reviewer configurations.\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n\nOne request from submission through approval or rejection and exit. Comparison horizon: request arrival through completion.\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\nDoes not represent reviewer breaks, rework, priority overrides.\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n- **Trigger:** Request submission\n- **Initial state:** \n - Scenario A: One available reviewer\n - Scenario B: Two available reviewers\n- **Initial request state:** none (arrivals from outside the system boundary)\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n**Flowing things:** Request items (each carries eligibility data deterministically determining approval or rejection outcome)\n\n**Resources:** Reviewers (exclusive-use resource; each reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently)\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\n**Reserve request and reviewer**\n- Input: incoming request (consumed/admitted)\n- Resource: one available reviewer (reserved, held until release)\n- Output: request in review with occupied reviewer\n- Duration: instantaneous\n\n**Check request**\n- Input: request with eligibility data (read; data remains with request)\n- Resource: occupied reviewer (held)\n- Duration: 20 minutes (fixed)\n- Output: request with outcome (approved or rejected, deterministically selected from request data)\n\n**Record outcome and release reviewer**\n- Input: checked request with outcome (consumed/completed)\n- Resource: occupied reviewer (released back to available pool)\n- Output: approved or rejected request exits the boundary\n- Duration: instantaneous\n\n### Case and process spine\n\n#### Primary case: Request approval workflow\n\n**Trigger:** Request arrives at submission boundary\n\n**Ordered account:**\n1. Request and one available reviewer are reserved together\n2. Reviewer checks request for 20 minutes (occupying that reviewer)\n3. Documented eligibility rule selects outcome (approved or rejected) from request data\n4. Outcome is recorded; reviewer is released to available pool\n5. Request (approved or rejected) exits the boundary\n\n**Branches:** Two mutually exclusive outcomes (approved or rejected) after check completes, determined by eligibility rule applied to request data\n\n**Waiting:** Request cannot proceed until a reviewer is available; waiting occurs at the reserve-request-and-reviewer step when all reviewers are occupied\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n- **Check duration:** 20 minutes (constant, not stochastic)\n- **Request arrivals:** One at a time, every 30 minutes (constant inter-arrival time; external to boundary)\n- **Outcomes:** Deterministic selection by documented eligibility rule (no stochasticity in branching)\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\n- **Exclusivity:** A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n- **Deterministic outcome:** Eligibility rule uniquely determines each outcome; no policy override or discretion\n- **No recovery or rework:** Recorded outcome is final; request exits after recording\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\nFrom supplied account:\n- \"a reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer\" → reviewer acquisition is part of case admission\n- \"checks it for 20 minutes\" → 20 minutes is the sole time input; no variation stated\n- \"records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule\" → outcome is deterministic from request data\n- \"Recording the outcome releases the reviewer\" → release point is at outcome recording\n- \"requests are distinct work items\" → each request is a separate, independent case instance\n- \"A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\" → reviewer is an exclusive-use resource during check\n- \"the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request\" → branching is non-probabilistic, data-driven\n\n### Normalized account (working account)\n\nA single request case:\n1. Request arrives; reserves one available reviewer\n2. Reviewer checks request for 20 minutes\n3. Deterministic outcome (approved or rejected) is recorded based on request data\n4. Reviewer is released\n5. Request exits\n\nScenario variations: same process structure, but initial reviewer availability is 1 or 2.\n\n## Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nNone required; all material facts are supplied.\n\n### Deferred\n\n**Not deferred, but construction will require decision:** How to represent the two comparison scenarios (single net with parameterized reviewer count vs. two separate nets). This is not a workpiece gap but a construction representation choice.\n\n## Construction review\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\nTwo representations are possible:\n1. **Two separate nets:** One net with initial reviewer availability = 1; a second net with initial reviewer availability = 2. Each can be constructed, simulated, and compared independently.\n2. **Single parameterized net:** One net with a parameter for reviewer availability, initialized to 1 or 2 by the scenario. Single net structure, multiple simulations.\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n- Full operational description of the request approval process\n- Clear resource contention model (reviewer exclusivity)\n- Deterministic outcome branching rule\n- Timing (20 min check, 30 min inter-arrival)\n- Two distinct comparison scenarios (initial reviewer count)\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\nNone for workpiece purposes. All operational facts supplied.\n\n### Net status and tool evidence\n\nNot yet constructed. Awaiting construction decision on scenario representation.\n```\n\n---\n\n## First Consequential SDCPN Construction Decision\n\n**Question:** Should the model represent the two approval turnaround comparison scenarios (1 vs. 2 reviewers) as:\n\n1. **Two separate nets** — one with reviewer availability initialized to 1, the second with availability initialized to 2, each built and simulated independently to compare their turnaround times, or\n\n2. **A single parameterized net** — one net structure with a numeric parameter controlling initial reviewer availability, simulated twice under different parameter values?\n\n**Why this is consequential:** The choice affects whether to construct a single stable net or to maintain two, whether parameterization is used, and how the comparison simulations will later be run. Both are valid in Petrinaut; the choice rests on the comparison workflow preference.\n\nThe workpiece is complete and ready to receive either direction.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1F0QCJZBYSZ53YXSK790BF5" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:00.000Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:00.003Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:00.023Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:00.029Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QCKX5806AX15PS7D0JG9", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:00.029Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QCKX5806AX15PS7D0JG9", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:00.029Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284220040 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QCKX5806AX15PS7D0JG9", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:00.738Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QCKX5806AX15PS7D0JG9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:00.740Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "The user is", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QCKX5806AX15PS7D0JG9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:01.743Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " asking me to:\n1. Use the account they've supplied as complete modelling input\n2. Not interview them\n3. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n4. Not mutate a net\n\nThey've provided:\n- Purpose: compare approval turnaround under one", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QCKX5806AX15PS7D0JG9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:01.743Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " reviewer versus two\n- Boundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection\n- Case spine (operational description): submission → reserve request and reviewer → check for 20 minutes → record", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QCKX5806AX15PS7D0JG9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:01.744Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " outcome (approved/rejected based on documented rule) → release reviewer → exit\n- Resources and initial state: requests are work items; initially", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QCKX5806AX15PS7D0JG9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:01.744Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " 1 available reviewer; comparison changes to 2; reviewer can't check 2 concurrently\n- Branch evidence: documented eligibility rule is deterministic based on request data\n- Timing: checks are 20 minutes; arrivals every", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QCKX5806AX15PS7D0JG9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:02.869Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " 30 minutes\n- Assumptions and limits: ignore breaks, rework, priority overrides\n\nI need to:\n1. Activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first\n2. Develop a workpiece based on this", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QCKX5806AX15PS7D0JG9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:02.870Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " account\n3. Identify the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n4. State it clearly\n5. Stop without building/mutating a net\n\nLet me activate the skill first.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QCKX5806AX15PS7D0JG9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:02.870Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QCKX5806AX15PS7D0JG9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:02.870Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "The user is asking me to:\n1. Use the account they've supplied as complete modelling input\n2. Not interview them\n3. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n4. Not mutate a net\n\nThey've provided:\n- Purpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two\n- Boundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection\n- Case spine (operational description): submission → reserve request and reviewer → check for 20 minutes → record outcome (approved/rejected based on documented rule) → release reviewer → exit\n- Resources and initial state: requests are work items; initially 1 available reviewer; comparison changes to 2; reviewer can't check 2 concurrently\n- Branch evidence: documented eligibility rule is deterministic based on request data\n- Timing: checks are 20 minutes; arrivals every 30 minutes\n- Assumptions and limits: ignore breaks, rework, priority overrides\n\nI need to:\n1. Activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first\n2. Develop a workpiece based on this account\n3. Identify the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n4. State it clearly\n5. Stop without building/mutating a net\n\nLet me activate the skill first.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QCKX5806AX15PS7D0JG9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:02.870Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DvYPKfT9R6qKjq1dGpRfcK", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QCKX5806AX15PS7D0JG9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:02.872Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DvYPKfT9R6qKjq1dGpRfcK", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\": \"sdcpn-modelling", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QCKX5806AX15PS7D0JG9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:02.872Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DvYPKfT9R6qKjq1dGpRfcK", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QCKX5806AX15PS7D0JG9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:02.872Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QCKX5806AX15PS7D0JG9", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 2853, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8DdwwP56m9hcLufSJx", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to:\n1. Use the account they've supplied as complete modelling input\n2. Not interview them\n3. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n4. Not mutate a net\n\nThey've provided:\n- Purpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two\n- Boundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection\n- Case spine (operational description): submission → reserve request and reviewer → check for 20 minutes → record outcome (approved/rejected based on documented rule) → release reviewer → exit\n- Resources and initial state: requests are work items; initially 1 available reviewer; comparison changes to 2; reviewer can't check 2 concurrently\n- Branch evidence: documented eligibility rule is deterministic based on request data\n- Timing: checks are 20 minutes; arrivals every 30 minutes\n- Assumptions and limits: ignore breaks, rework, priority overrides\n\nI need to:\n1. Activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first\n2. Develop a workpiece based on this account\n3. Identify the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n4. State it clearly\n5. Stop without building/mutating a net\n\nLet me activate the skill first.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01DvYPKfT9R6qKjq1dGpRfcK", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2635, + "output": 348, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 2983, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0026349999999999998, + "output": 0.0017400000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.004375 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:02.882Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to:\n1. Use the account they've supplied as complete modelling input\n2. Not interview them\n3. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n4. Not mutate a net\n\nThey've provided:\n- Purpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two\n- Boundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection\n- Case spine (operational description): submission → reserve request and reviewer → check for 20 minutes → record outcome (approved/rejected based on documented rule) → release reviewer → exit\n- Resources and initial state: requests are work items; initially 1 available reviewer; comparison changes to 2; reviewer can't check 2 concurrently\n- Branch evidence: documented eligibility rule is deterministic based on request data\n- Timing: checks are 20 minutes; arrivals every 30 minutes\n- Assumptions and limits: ignore breaks, rework, priority overrides\n\nI need to:\n1. Activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first\n2. Develop a workpiece based on this account\n3. Identify the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n4. State it clearly\n5. Stop without building/mutating a net\n\nLet me activate the skill first.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01DvYPKfT9R6qKjq1dGpRfcK", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2635, + "output": 348, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 2983, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0026349999999999998, + "output": 0.0017400000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.004375 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 286 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284220040, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8DdwwP56m9hcLufSJx", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QCKX5806AX15PS7D0JG9", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:02.883Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DvYPKfT9R6qKjq1dGpRfcK", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QCKX5806AX15PS7D0JG9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:02.884Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DvYPKfT9R6qKjq1dGpRfcK", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284222887 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QCKX5806AX15PS7D0JG9", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:02.887Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DvYPKfT9R6qKjq1dGpRfcK", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284222887 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QCKX5806AX15PS7D0JG9", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:02.887Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DvYPKfT9R6qKjq1dGpRfcK", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 3, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QCKX5806AX15PS7D0JG9", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:02.888Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QCKX5806AX15PS7D0JG9", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to:\n1. Use the account they've supplied as complete modelling input\n2. Not interview them\n3. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n4. Not mutate a net\n\nThey've provided:\n- Purpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two\n- Boundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection\n- Case spine (operational description): submission → reserve request and reviewer → check for 20 minutes → record outcome (approved/rejected based on documented rule) → release reviewer → exit\n- Resources and initial state: requests are work items; initially 1 available reviewer; comparison changes to 2; reviewer can't check 2 concurrently\n- Branch evidence: documented eligibility rule is deterministic based on request data\n- Timing: checks are 20 minutes; arrivals every 30 minutes\n- Assumptions and limits: ignore breaks, rework, priority overrides\n\nI need to:\n1. Activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first\n2. Develop a workpiece based on this account\n3. Identify the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n4. State it clearly\n5. Stop without building/mutating a net\n\nLet me activate the skill first.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01DvYPKfT9R6qKjq1dGpRfcK", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2635, + "output": 348, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 2983, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0026349999999999998, + "output": 0.0017400000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.004375 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 286 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284220040, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8DdwwP56m9hcLufSJx", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DvYPKfT9R6qKjq1dGpRfcK", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284222887 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:02.888Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QFD880P1QRVNH9K18HRR", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:02.889Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QFD880P1QRVNH9K18HRR", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to:\n1. Use the account they've supplied as complete modelling input\n2. Not interview them\n3. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n4. Not mutate a net\n\nThey've provided:\n- Purpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two\n- Boundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection\n- Case spine (operational description): submission → reserve request and reviewer → check for 20 minutes → record outcome (approved/rejected based on documented rule) → release reviewer → exit\n- Resources and initial state: requests are work items; initially 1 available reviewer; comparison changes to 2; reviewer can't check 2 concurrently\n- Branch evidence: documented eligibility rule is deterministic based on request data\n- Timing: checks are 20 minutes; arrivals every 30 minutes\n- Assumptions and limits: ignore breaks, rework, priority overrides\n\nI need to:\n1. Activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first\n2. Develop a workpiece based on this account\n3. Identify the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n4. State it clearly\n5. Stop without building/mutating a net\n\nLet me activate the skill first.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01DvYPKfT9R6qKjq1dGpRfcK", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DvYPKfT9R6qKjq1dGpRfcK", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:02.889Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284222890 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QFD880P1QRVNH9K18HRR", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:03.499Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QFD880P1QRVNH9K18HRR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:03.500Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "Good,", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QFD880P1QRVNH9K18HRR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:04.502Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " I've activated the skill. Now I need to follow the construct-only branch because the user said \"Use the supplied account", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QFD880P1QRVNH9K18HRR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:04.502Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " as complete modelling input. Do not interview me.\"\n\nAccording to the skill instructions:\n- I should use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input\n- Do not interview", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QFD880P1QRVNH9K18HRR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:04.502Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "\n- Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`\n- Use mounted construction tools\n- If a consequential gap prevents construction, report it; don't ask\n\nThe user also says \"Stop after stating", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QFD880P1QRVNH9K18HRR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:05.533Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\"\n\nSo", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QFD880P1QRVNH9K18HRR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:05.533Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " I need to:\n1. Develop a workpiece from the supplied account\n2. Identify the first consequential construction decision\n3. State it\n4. Stop without building anything\n\nLet", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QFD880P1QRVNH9K18HRR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:05.533Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " me first read the workpiece template to understand how to structure this, then the pn-construction guidance to understand construction decisions.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QFD880P1QRVNH9K18HRR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:05.533Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QFD880P1QRVNH9K18HRR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:05.766Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "Good, I've activated the skill. Now I need to follow the construct-only branch because the user said \"Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me.\"\n\nAccording to the skill instructions:\n- I should use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input\n- Do not interview\n- Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`\n- Use mounted construction tools\n- If a consequential gap prevents construction, report it; don't ask\n\nThe user also says \"Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\"\n\nSo I need to:\n1. Develop a workpiece from the supplied account\n2. Identify the first consequential construction decision\n3. State it\n4. Stop without building anything\n\nLet me first read the workpiece template to understand how to structure this, then the pn-construction guidance to understand construction decisions.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QFD880P1QRVNH9K18HRR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:05.766Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_013vmvbmBayzxhXJ84W9DDfJ", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QFD880P1QRVNH9K18HRR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:05.766Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_013vmvbmBayzxhXJ84W9DDfJ", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\": \"/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QFD880P1QRVNH9K18HRR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:05.767Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_013vmvbmBayzxhXJ84W9DDfJ", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QFD880P1QRVNH9K18HRR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:06.026Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01UFZbgEp6irMUxeaMhrp7q1", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QFD880P1QRVNH9K18HRR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:06.027Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01UFZbgEp6irMUxeaMhrp7q1", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\": \"/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QFD880P1QRVNH9K18HRR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:06.027Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01UFZbgEp6irMUxeaMhrp7q1", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QFD880P1QRVNH9K18HRR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:06.038Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QFD880P1QRVNH9K18HRR", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3260, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8Dr1imEEshFWMAbrxq", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, I've activated the skill. Now I need to follow the construct-only branch because the user said \"Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me.\"\n\nAccording to the skill instructions:\n- I should use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input\n- Do not interview\n- Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`\n- Use mounted construction tools\n- If a consequential gap prevents construction, report it; don't ask\n\nThe user also says \"Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\"\n\nSo I need to:\n1. Develop a workpiece from the supplied account\n2. Identify the first consequential construction decision\n3. State it\n4. Stop without building anything\n\nLet me first read the workpiece template to understand how to structure this, then the pn-construction guidance to understand construction decisions.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_013vmvbmBayzxhXJ84W9DDfJ", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01UFZbgEp6irMUxeaMhrp7q1", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 376, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4155, + "totalTokens": 4543, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.0018800000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.00519375, + "total": 0.00708575 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:06.150Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, I've activated the skill. Now I need to follow the construct-only branch because the user said \"Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me.\"\n\nAccording to the skill instructions:\n- I should use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input\n- Do not interview\n- Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`\n- Use mounted construction tools\n- If a consequential gap prevents construction, report it; don't ask\n\nThe user also says \"Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\"\n\nSo I need to:\n1. Develop a workpiece from the supplied account\n2. Identify the first consequential construction decision\n3. State it\n4. Stop without building anything\n\nLet me first read the workpiece template to understand how to structure this, then the pn-construction guidance to understand construction decisions.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_013vmvbmBayzxhXJ84W9DDfJ", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01UFZbgEp6irMUxeaMhrp7q1", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 376, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4155, + "totalTokens": 4543, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.0018800000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.00519375, + "total": 0.00708575 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 206 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284222890, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8Dr1imEEshFWMAbrxq", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QFD880P1QRVNH9K18HRR", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:06.150Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_013vmvbmBayzxhXJ84W9DDfJ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QFD880P1QRVNH9K18HRR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:06.150Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01UFZbgEp6irMUxeaMhrp7q1", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QFD880P1QRVNH9K18HRR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:06.150Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_013vmvbmBayzxhXJ84W9DDfJ", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Process-Model Workpiece and Recording Contract\n\nThe workpiece is the shared, recoverable operational account. Elicitation and revision maintain it; construction consumes it. The transcript remains evidence, not the primary model.\n\nFollow the person's thread during conversation and file material into the workpiece afterward. Its headings are recording homes, not question order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose, while keeping consequential omissions visible.\n\n## Recording distinctions\n\nUse these distinctions wherever they carry information; they are not mandatory labels on every sentence:\n\n- **Expert evidence** — What the person said, preserving consequential vocabulary, hedges, context, and source regime.\n- **Working account** — The current normalized operational description accepted for use.\n- **Agent inference** — An interpretation of evidence, visibly attributed to the agent.\n- **Assumed** — A value or structure proposed by the agent, with its reason, consequence, and route to checking.\n- **Unknown** — Asked, but the person does not know.\n- **Not yet asked** — Relevant and identified, but not yet addressed.\n- **Deferred** — Left for later, with why it matters and a named source or route to an answer.\n- **Declined** — The person chose not to answer or include it.\n- **Conflict** — Accounts cannot yet be used together; preserve both and what could distinguish them.\n- **Correction** — A current account that replaces an earlier one, retaining enough history to explain the change without leaving both active.\n- **Contextual coexistence** — Different accounts apply under different people, times, modes, directions, policies, or operating conditions.\n- **Omitted** — Deliberately outside the model, with why the purpose permits the omission.\n- **Target loss** — Supported operational meaning the SDCPN or current tools cannot faithfully carry.\n\nEvidence and precision are independent. “About three hours” may be supported but coarse; an exact agent-supplied value may be precise-looking but unsupported.\n\nKeep one authoritative home for each active claim. Do not accumulate competing summaries. When a later statement differs, establish whether it is a correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before updating the working account.\n\n## Workpiece template\n\n```markdown\n# Process-Model Workpiece\n\n## Purpose and posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\n\n### Who will use it and how\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n\n### Available time and assumption appetite\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; record its ordering in the process spine.\n\n### Case and process spine\n\nGive the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary: what admits the case, what flows, which activities occur and in what order, what changes the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the work and resources, and what outcome or handoff ends it.\n\n#### Primary case: \n\n##### Trigger or admission\n\n##### Ordered account and references\n\n##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes\n\n##### Objective dependencies\n\n#### Additional or contrasting case: \n\nAdd only when a different case exposes consequential structure the primary case does not.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\n### Validation evidence and data sources\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\nKeep evidence beside affected process material where practical. Use this section for evidence spanning several parts of the account or whose relationship needs explanation.\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\n### Normalized account\n\n### Agent inferences and proposed structure\n\n## Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nFor each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked.\n\n### Unknown to the person\n\n### Not yet asked\n\n### Declined\n\n### Deferred and deposits\n\nFor each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it.\n\n### Ambiguities and conflicts\n\nPreserve alternatives and the evidence for each. Do not choose or average without support.\n\n### Corrections\n\nState the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active.\n\n### Contextual coexistence\n\nPreserve accounts differing by person, time, condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one.\n\n### Deliberate omissions and simplifications\n\nState what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong.\n\n## Construction review\n\nOpen this section only when construction begins.\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\n### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults\n\n### Questions reopened by construction\n\n### Target-representation and tooling losses\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\n### Net status and tool evidence\n```\n\n## Maintenance\n\n- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions.\n- Update the authoritative process spine when ordering or case behavior changes; reference activity and resource entries rather than duplicating their local details.\n- A restatement offered by the agent remains normalization even when accepted. Preserve exact evidence separately where origin matters.\n- For a genuine correction, update the active account and record what changed. For conflict or contextual coexistence, keep the alternatives and their unresolved or selecting conditions visible.\n- Remove irrelevant empty sections. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, or **Omitted** only when that state matters to later work.\n- If construction requires transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that boundary.\n- Record whether no construction was attempted, construction was blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md", + "lines": 154 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284226152 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QFD880P1QRVNH9K18HRR", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:06.152Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_013vmvbmBayzxhXJ84W9DDfJ", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Process-Model Workpiece and Recording Contract\n\nThe workpiece is the shared, recoverable operational account. Elicitation and revision maintain it; construction consumes it. The transcript remains evidence, not the primary model.\n\nFollow the person's thread during conversation and file material into the workpiece afterward. Its headings are recording homes, not question order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose, while keeping consequential omissions visible.\n\n## Recording distinctions\n\nUse these distinctions wherever they carry information; they are not mandatory labels on every sentence:\n\n- **Expert evidence** — What the person said, preserving consequential vocabulary, hedges, context, and source regime.\n- **Working account** — The current normalized operational description accepted for use.\n- **Agent inference** — An interpretation of evidence, visibly attributed to the agent.\n- **Assumed** — A value or structure proposed by the agent, with its reason, consequence, and route to checking.\n- **Unknown** — Asked, but the person does not know.\n- **Not yet asked** — Relevant and identified, but not yet addressed.\n- **Deferred** — Left for later, with why it matters and a named source or route to an answer.\n- **Declined** — The person chose not to answer or include it.\n- **Conflict** — Accounts cannot yet be used together; preserve both and what could distinguish them.\n- **Correction** — A current account that replaces an earlier one, retaining enough history to explain the change without leaving both active.\n- **Contextual coexistence** — Different accounts apply under different people, times, modes, directions, policies, or operating conditions.\n- **Omitted** — Deliberately outside the model, with why the purpose permits the omission.\n- **Target loss** — Supported operational meaning the SDCPN or current tools cannot faithfully carry.\n\nEvidence and precision are independent. “About three hours” may be supported but coarse; an exact agent-supplied value may be precise-looking but unsupported.\n\nKeep one authoritative home for each active claim. Do not accumulate competing summaries. When a later statement differs, establish whether it is a correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before updating the working account.\n\n## Workpiece template\n\n```markdown\n# Process-Model Workpiece\n\n## Purpose and posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\n\n### Who will use it and how\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n\n### Available time and assumption appetite\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; record its ordering in the process spine.\n\n### Case and process spine\n\nGive the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary: what admits the case, what flows, which activities occur and in what order, what changes the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the work and resources, and what outcome or handoff ends it.\n\n#### Primary case: \n\n##### Trigger or admission\n\n##### Ordered account and references\n\n##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes\n\n##### Objective dependencies\n\n#### Additional or contrasting case: \n\nAdd only when a different case exposes consequential structure the primary case does not.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\n### Validation evidence and data sources\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\nKeep evidence beside affected process material where practical. Use this section for evidence spanning several parts of the account or whose relationship needs explanation.\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\n### Normalized account\n\n### Agent inferences and proposed structure\n\n## Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nFor each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked.\n\n### Unknown to the person\n\n### Not yet asked\n\n### Declined\n\n### Deferred and deposits\n\nFor each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it.\n\n### Ambiguities and conflicts\n\nPreserve alternatives and the evidence for each. Do not choose or average without support.\n\n### Corrections\n\nState the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active.\n\n### Contextual coexistence\n\nPreserve accounts differing by person, time, condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one.\n\n### Deliberate omissions and simplifications\n\nState what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong.\n\n## Construction review\n\nOpen this section only when construction begins.\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\n### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults\n\n### Questions reopened by construction\n\n### Target-representation and tooling losses\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\n### Net status and tool evidence\n```\n\n## Maintenance\n\n- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions.\n- Update the authoritative process spine when ordering or case behavior changes; reference activity and resource entries rather than duplicating their local details.\n- A restatement offered by the agent remains normalization even when accepted. Preserve exact evidence separately where origin matters.\n- For a genuine correction, update the active account and record what changed. For conflict or contextual coexistence, keep the alternatives and their unresolved or selecting conditions visible.\n- Remove irrelevant empty sections. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, or **Omitted** only when that state matters to later work.\n- If construction requires transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that boundary.\n- Record whether no construction was attempted, construction was blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md", + "lines": 154 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284226152 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QFD880P1QRVNH9K18HRR", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:06.152Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01UFZbgEp6irMUxeaMhrp7q1", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284226152 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QFD880P1QRVNH9K18HRR", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:06.152Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01UFZbgEp6irMUxeaMhrp7q1", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284226152 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QFD880P1QRVNH9K18HRR", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:06.152Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_013vmvbmBayzxhXJ84W9DDfJ", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Process-Model Workpiece and Recording Contract\n\nThe workpiece is the shared, recoverable operational account. Elicitation and revision maintain it; construction consumes it. The transcript remains evidence, not the primary model.\n\nFollow the person's thread during conversation and file material into the workpiece afterward. Its headings are recording homes, not question order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose, while keeping consequential omissions visible.\n\n## Recording distinctions\n\nUse these distinctions wherever they carry information; they are not mandatory labels on every sentence:\n\n- **Expert evidence** — What the person said, preserving consequential vocabulary, hedges, context, and source regime.\n- **Working account** — The current normalized operational description accepted for use.\n- **Agent inference** — An interpretation of evidence, visibly attributed to the agent.\n- **Assumed** — A value or structure proposed by the agent, with its reason, consequence, and route to checking.\n- **Unknown** — Asked, but the person does not know.\n- **Not yet asked** — Relevant and identified, but not yet addressed.\n- **Deferred** — Left for later, with why it matters and a named source or route to an answer.\n- **Declined** — The person chose not to answer or include it.\n- **Conflict** — Accounts cannot yet be used together; preserve both and what could distinguish them.\n- **Correction** — A current account that replaces an earlier one, retaining enough history to explain the change without leaving both active.\n- **Contextual coexistence** — Different accounts apply under different people, times, modes, directions, policies, or operating conditions.\n- **Omitted** — Deliberately outside the model, with why the purpose permits the omission.\n- **Target loss** — Supported operational meaning the SDCPN or current tools cannot faithfully carry.\n\nEvidence and precision are independent. “About three hours” may be supported but coarse; an exact agent-supplied value may be precise-looking but unsupported.\n\nKeep one authoritative home for each active claim. Do not accumulate competing summaries. When a later statement differs, establish whether it is a correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before updating the working account.\n\n## Workpiece template\n\n```markdown\n# Process-Model Workpiece\n\n## Purpose and posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\n\n### Who will use it and how\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n\n### Available time and assumption appetite\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; record its ordering in the process spine.\n\n### Case and process spine\n\nGive the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary: what admits the case, what flows, which activities occur and in what order, what changes the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the work and resources, and what outcome or handoff ends it.\n\n#### Primary case: \n\n##### Trigger or admission\n\n##### Ordered account and references\n\n##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes\n\n##### Objective dependencies\n\n#### Additional or contrasting case: \n\nAdd only when a different case exposes consequential structure the primary case does not.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\n### Validation evidence and data sources\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\nKeep evidence beside affected process material where practical. Use this section for evidence spanning several parts of the account or whose relationship needs explanation.\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\n### Normalized account\n\n### Agent inferences and proposed structure\n\n## Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nFor each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked.\n\n### Unknown to the person\n\n### Not yet asked\n\n### Declined\n\n### Deferred and deposits\n\nFor each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it.\n\n### Ambiguities and conflicts\n\nPreserve alternatives and the evidence for each. Do not choose or average without support.\n\n### Corrections\n\nState the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active.\n\n### Contextual coexistence\n\nPreserve accounts differing by person, time, condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one.\n\n### Deliberate omissions and simplifications\n\nState what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong.\n\n## Construction review\n\nOpen this section only when construction begins.\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\n### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults\n\n### Questions reopened by construction\n\n### Target-representation and tooling losses\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\n### Net status and tool evidence\n```\n\n## Maintenance\n\n- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions.\n- Update the authoritative process spine when ordering or case behavior changes; reference activity and resource entries rather than duplicating their local details.\n- A restatement offered by the agent remains normalization even when accepted. Preserve exact evidence separately where origin matters.\n- For a genuine correction, update the active account and record what changed. For conflict or contextual coexistence, keep the alternatives and their unresolved or selecting conditions visible.\n- Remove irrelevant empty sections. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, or **Omitted** only when that state matters to later work.\n- If construction requires transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that boundary.\n- Record whether no construction was attempted, construction was blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md", + "lines": 154 + } + }, + "durationMs": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QFD880P1QRVNH9K18HRR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:06.153Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Process-Model Workpiece and Recording Contract\n\nThe workpiece is the shared, recoverable operational account. Elicitation and revision maintain it; construction consumes it. The transcript remains evidence, not the primary model.\n\nFollow the person's thread during conversation and file material into the workpiece afterward. Its headings are recording homes, not question order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose, while keeping consequential omissions visible.\n\n## Recording distinctions\n\nUse these distinctions wherever they carry information; they are not mandatory labels on every sentence:\n\n- **Expert evidence** — What the person said, preserving consequential vocabulary, hedges, context, and source regime.\n- **Working account** — The current normalized operational description accepted for use.\n- **Agent inference** — An interpretation of evidence, visibly attributed to the agent.\n- **Assumed** — A value or structure proposed by the agent, with its reason, consequence, and route to checking.\n- **Unknown** — Asked, but the person does not know.\n- **Not yet asked** — Relevant and identified, but not yet addressed.\n- **Deferred** — Left for later, with why it matters and a named source or route to an answer.\n- **Declined** — The person chose not to answer or include it.\n- **Conflict** — Accounts cannot yet be used together; preserve both and what could distinguish them.\n- **Correction** — A current account that replaces an earlier one, retaining enough history to explain the change without leaving both active.\n- **Contextual coexistence** — Different accounts apply under different people, times, modes, directions, policies, or operating conditions.\n- **Omitted** — Deliberately outside the model, with why the purpose permits the omission.\n- **Target loss** — Supported operational meaning the SDCPN or current tools cannot faithfully carry.\n\nEvidence and precision are independent. “About three hours” may be supported but coarse; an exact agent-supplied value may be precise-looking but unsupported.\n\nKeep one authoritative home for each active claim. Do not accumulate competing summaries. When a later statement differs, establish whether it is a correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before updating the working account.\n\n## Workpiece template\n\n```markdown\n# Process-Model Workpiece\n\n## Purpose and posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\n\n### Who will use it and how\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n\n### Available time and assumption appetite\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; record its ordering in the process spine.\n\n### Case and process spine\n\nGive the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary: what admits the case, what flows, which activities occur and in what order, what changes the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the work and resources, and what outcome or handoff ends it.\n\n#### Primary case: \n\n##### Trigger or admission\n\n##### Ordered account and references\n\n##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes\n\n##### Objective dependencies\n\n#### Additional or contrasting case: \n\nAdd only when a different case exposes consequential structure the primary case does not.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\n### Validation evidence and data sources\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\nKeep evidence beside affected process material where practical. Use this section for evidence spanning several parts of the account or whose relationship needs explanation.\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\n### Normalized account\n\n### Agent inferences and proposed structure\n\n## Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nFor each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked.\n\n### Unknown to the person\n\n### Not yet asked\n\n### Declined\n\n### Deferred and deposits\n\nFor each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it.\n\n### Ambiguities and conflicts\n\nPreserve alternatives and the evidence for each. Do not choose or average without support.\n\n### Corrections\n\nState the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active.\n\n### Contextual coexistence\n\nPreserve accounts differing by person, time, condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one.\n\n### Deliberate omissions and simplifications\n\nState what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong.\n\n## Construction review\n\nOpen this section only when construction begins.\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\n### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults\n\n### Questions reopened by construction\n\n### Target-representation and tooling losses\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\n### Net status and tool evidence\n```\n\n## Maintenance\n\n- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions.\n- Update the authoritative process spine when ordering or case behavior changes; reference activity and resource entries rather than duplicating their local details.\n- A restatement offered by the agent remains normalization even when accepted. Preserve exact evidence separately where origin matters.\n- For a genuine correction, update the active account and record what changed. For conflict or contextual coexistence, keep the alternatives and their unresolved or selecting conditions visible.\n- Remove irrelevant empty sections. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, or **Omitted** only when that state matters to later work.\n- If construction requires transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that boundary.\n- Record whether no construction was attempted, construction was blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone.\n" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01UFZbgEp6irMUxeaMhrp7q1", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + } + }, + "durationMs": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QFD880P1QRVNH9K18HRR", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:06.153Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QFD880P1QRVNH9K18HRR", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, I've activated the skill. Now I need to follow the construct-only branch because the user said \"Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me.\"\n\nAccording to the skill instructions:\n- I should use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input\n- Do not interview\n- Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`\n- Use mounted construction tools\n- If a consequential gap prevents construction, report it; don't ask\n\nThe user also says \"Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\"\n\nSo I need to:\n1. Develop a workpiece from the supplied account\n2. Identify the first consequential construction decision\n3. State it\n4. Stop without building anything\n\nLet me first read the workpiece template to understand how to structure this, then the pn-construction guidance to understand construction decisions.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_013vmvbmBayzxhXJ84W9DDfJ", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01UFZbgEp6irMUxeaMhrp7q1", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 376, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4155, + "totalTokens": 4543, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.0018800000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.00519375, + "total": 0.00708575 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 206 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284222890, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8Dr1imEEshFWMAbrxq", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_013vmvbmBayzxhXJ84W9DDfJ", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Process-Model Workpiece and Recording Contract\n\nThe workpiece is the shared, recoverable operational account. Elicitation and revision maintain it; construction consumes it. The transcript remains evidence, not the primary model.\n\nFollow the person's thread during conversation and file material into the workpiece afterward. Its headings are recording homes, not question order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose, while keeping consequential omissions visible.\n\n## Recording distinctions\n\nUse these distinctions wherever they carry information; they are not mandatory labels on every sentence:\n\n- **Expert evidence** — What the person said, preserving consequential vocabulary, hedges, context, and source regime.\n- **Working account** — The current normalized operational description accepted for use.\n- **Agent inference** — An interpretation of evidence, visibly attributed to the agent.\n- **Assumed** — A value or structure proposed by the agent, with its reason, consequence, and route to checking.\n- **Unknown** — Asked, but the person does not know.\n- **Not yet asked** — Relevant and identified, but not yet addressed.\n- **Deferred** — Left for later, with why it matters and a named source or route to an answer.\n- **Declined** — The person chose not to answer or include it.\n- **Conflict** — Accounts cannot yet be used together; preserve both and what could distinguish them.\n- **Correction** — A current account that replaces an earlier one, retaining enough history to explain the change without leaving both active.\n- **Contextual coexistence** — Different accounts apply under different people, times, modes, directions, policies, or operating conditions.\n- **Omitted** — Deliberately outside the model, with why the purpose permits the omission.\n- **Target loss** — Supported operational meaning the SDCPN or current tools cannot faithfully carry.\n\nEvidence and precision are independent. “About three hours” may be supported but coarse; an exact agent-supplied value may be precise-looking but unsupported.\n\nKeep one authoritative home for each active claim. Do not accumulate competing summaries. When a later statement differs, establish whether it is a correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before updating the working account.\n\n## Workpiece template\n\n```markdown\n# Process-Model Workpiece\n\n## Purpose and posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\n\n### Who will use it and how\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n\n### Available time and assumption appetite\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; record its ordering in the process spine.\n\n### Case and process spine\n\nGive the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary: what admits the case, what flows, which activities occur and in what order, what changes the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the work and resources, and what outcome or handoff ends it.\n\n#### Primary case: \n\n##### Trigger or admission\n\n##### Ordered account and references\n\n##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes\n\n##### Objective dependencies\n\n#### Additional or contrasting case: \n\nAdd only when a different case exposes consequential structure the primary case does not.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\n### Validation evidence and data sources\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\nKeep evidence beside affected process material where practical. Use this section for evidence spanning several parts of the account or whose relationship needs explanation.\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\n### Normalized account\n\n### Agent inferences and proposed structure\n\n## Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nFor each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked.\n\n### Unknown to the person\n\n### Not yet asked\n\n### Declined\n\n### Deferred and deposits\n\nFor each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it.\n\n### Ambiguities and conflicts\n\nPreserve alternatives and the evidence for each. Do not choose or average without support.\n\n### Corrections\n\nState the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active.\n\n### Contextual coexistence\n\nPreserve accounts differing by person, time, condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one.\n\n### Deliberate omissions and simplifications\n\nState what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong.\n\n## Construction review\n\nOpen this section only when construction begins.\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\n### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults\n\n### Questions reopened by construction\n\n### Target-representation and tooling losses\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\n### Net status and tool evidence\n```\n\n## Maintenance\n\n- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions.\n- Update the authoritative process spine when ordering or case behavior changes; reference activity and resource entries rather than duplicating their local details.\n- A restatement offered by the agent remains normalization even when accepted. Preserve exact evidence separately where origin matters.\n- For a genuine correction, update the active account and record what changed. For conflict or contextual coexistence, keep the alternatives and their unresolved or selecting conditions visible.\n- Remove irrelevant empty sections. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, or **Omitted** only when that state matters to later work.\n- If construction requires transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that boundary.\n- Record whether no construction was attempted, construction was blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md", + "lines": 154 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284226152 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01UFZbgEp6irMUxeaMhrp7q1", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284226152 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:06.154Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:06.155Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to:\n1. Use the account they've supplied as complete modelling input\n2. Not interview them\n3. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n4. Not mutate a net\n\nThey've provided:\n- Purpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two\n- Boundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection\n- Case spine (operational description): submission → reserve request and reviewer → check for 20 minutes → record outcome (approved/rejected based on documented rule) → release reviewer → exit\n- Resources and initial state: requests are work items; initially 1 available reviewer; comparison changes to 2; reviewer can't check 2 concurrently\n- Branch evidence: documented eligibility rule is deterministic based on request data\n- Timing: checks are 20 minutes; arrivals every 30 minutes\n- Assumptions and limits: ignore breaks, rework, priority overrides\n\nI need to:\n1. Activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first\n2. Develop a workpiece based on this account\n3. Identify the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n4. State it clearly\n5. Stop without building/mutating a net\n\nLet me activate the skill first.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01DvYPKfT9R6qKjq1dGpRfcK", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DvYPKfT9R6qKjq1dGpRfcK", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, I've activated the skill. Now I need to follow the construct-only branch because the user said \"Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me.\"\n\nAccording to the skill instructions:\n- I should use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input\n- Do not interview\n- Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`\n- Use mounted construction tools\n- If a consequential gap prevents construction, report it; don't ask\n\nThe user also says \"Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\"\n\nSo I need to:\n1. Develop a workpiece from the supplied account\n2. Identify the first consequential construction decision\n3. State it\n4. Stop without building anything\n\nLet me first read the workpiece template to understand how to structure this, then the pn-construction guidance to understand construction decisions.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_013vmvbmBayzxhXJ84W9DDfJ", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01UFZbgEp6irMUxeaMhrp7q1", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_013vmvbmBayzxhXJ84W9DDfJ", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Process-Model Workpiece and Recording Contract\n\nThe workpiece is the shared, recoverable operational account. Elicitation and revision maintain it; construction consumes it. The transcript remains evidence, not the primary model.\n\nFollow the person's thread during conversation and file material into the workpiece afterward. Its headings are recording homes, not question order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose, while keeping consequential omissions visible.\n\n## Recording distinctions\n\nUse these distinctions wherever they carry information; they are not mandatory labels on every sentence:\n\n- **Expert evidence** — What the person said, preserving consequential vocabulary, hedges, context, and source regime.\n- **Working account** — The current normalized operational description accepted for use.\n- **Agent inference** — An interpretation of evidence, visibly attributed to the agent.\n- **Assumed** — A value or structure proposed by the agent, with its reason, consequence, and route to checking.\n- **Unknown** — Asked, but the person does not know.\n- **Not yet asked** — Relevant and identified, but not yet addressed.\n- **Deferred** — Left for later, with why it matters and a named source or route to an answer.\n- **Declined** — The person chose not to answer or include it.\n- **Conflict** — Accounts cannot yet be used together; preserve both and what could distinguish them.\n- **Correction** — A current account that replaces an earlier one, retaining enough history to explain the change without leaving both active.\n- **Contextual coexistence** — Different accounts apply under different people, times, modes, directions, policies, or operating conditions.\n- **Omitted** — Deliberately outside the model, with why the purpose permits the omission.\n- **Target loss** — Supported operational meaning the SDCPN or current tools cannot faithfully carry.\n\nEvidence and precision are independent. “About three hours” may be supported but coarse; an exact agent-supplied value may be precise-looking but unsupported.\n\nKeep one authoritative home for each active claim. Do not accumulate competing summaries. When a later statement differs, establish whether it is a correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before updating the working account.\n\n## Workpiece template\n\n```markdown\n# Process-Model Workpiece\n\n## Purpose and posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\n\n### Who will use it and how\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n\n### Available time and assumption appetite\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; record its ordering in the process spine.\n\n### Case and process spine\n\nGive the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary: what admits the case, what flows, which activities occur and in what order, what changes the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the work and resources, and what outcome or handoff ends it.\n\n#### Primary case: \n\n##### Trigger or admission\n\n##### Ordered account and references\n\n##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes\n\n##### Objective dependencies\n\n#### Additional or contrasting case: \n\nAdd only when a different case exposes consequential structure the primary case does not.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\n### Validation evidence and data sources\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\nKeep evidence beside affected process material where practical. Use this section for evidence spanning several parts of the account or whose relationship needs explanation.\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\n### Normalized account\n\n### Agent inferences and proposed structure\n\n## Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nFor each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked.\n\n### Unknown to the person\n\n### Not yet asked\n\n### Declined\n\n### Deferred and deposits\n\nFor each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it.\n\n### Ambiguities and conflicts\n\nPreserve alternatives and the evidence for each. Do not choose or average without support.\n\n### Corrections\n\nState the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active.\n\n### Contextual coexistence\n\nPreserve accounts differing by person, time, condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one.\n\n### Deliberate omissions and simplifications\n\nState what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong.\n\n## Construction review\n\nOpen this section only when construction begins.\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\n### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults\n\n### Questions reopened by construction\n\n### Target-representation and tooling losses\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\n### Net status and tool evidence\n```\n\n## Maintenance\n\n- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions.\n- Update the authoritative process spine when ordering or case behavior changes; reference activity and resource entries rather than duplicating their local details.\n- A restatement offered by the agent remains normalization even when accepted. Preserve exact evidence separately where origin matters.\n- For a genuine correction, update the active account and record what changed. For conflict or contextual coexistence, keep the alternatives and their unresolved or selecting conditions visible.\n- Remove irrelevant empty sections. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, or **Omitted** only when that state matters to later work.\n- If construction requires transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that boundary.\n- Record whether no construction was attempted, construction was blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01UFZbgEp6irMUxeaMhrp7q1", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 57, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:06.155Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284226156 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 58, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:07.085Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 59, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:07.086Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "Good", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 60, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:08.089Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ".", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 61, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:08.089Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " Now", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 62, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:08.089Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " I have the construction", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 63, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:08.089Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " guidance", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 64, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:08.089Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ". Let me develop the workpiece from the supplied account, then identify the first consequ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 65, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:08.089Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "ential construction decision.\n\nThe supplied account is quite complete:\n- Purpose: compare approval turnaround under", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 66, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:08.089Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " one reviewer vs. two\n- Boundary: one request from submission through approval or", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 67, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:08.089Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " rejection\n- Case spine: submission → reserve request and reviewer → check 20 minutes", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 68, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:09.406Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " → record outcome (deterministic based on request data) → release reviewer → exit\n- Resources", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 69, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:09.406Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "/initial state: requests are work items; 1 available reviewer", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 70, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:09.406Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " initially (then 2 for comparison); reviewer can't check 2", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 71, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:10.466Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " concurrently\n- Branch evidence: eligibility rule is deterministic based on request data\n- Timing", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 72, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:10.466Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ": checks 20 min; arrivals 30 min\n- Assumptions/limits: ignore breaks", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 73, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:10.466Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ", rework, overrides\n\nThis is quite specific. Let me structure this into a workpiece to be clear about what we", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 74, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:10.466Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " have.\n\nFirst consequential construction decision would likely be:\n1. How to represent the two scenarios (1 vs 2 reviewers) - separate", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 75, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:11.666Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " nets or parameterized single net?\n2. How to model the deterministic branching outcome\n3. How to model the resource contention for review", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 76, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:11.666Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "ers\n4. How to model the external arrivals\n\nThe most fundamental decision is probably: should we construct", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 77, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:11.666Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " two separate nets (one for each reviewer count) or a single parameterized net with a parameter controlling reviewer availability?\n\nThis is consequ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 78, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:12.001Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "ential because it affects the entire structure.\n\nLet me build the workpiece first.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 79, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:12.001Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "Good. Now I have the construction guidance. Let me develop the workpiece from the supplied account, then identify the first consequential construction decision.\n\nThe supplied account is quite complete:\n- Purpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer vs. two\n- Boundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection\n- Case spine: submission → reserve request and reviewer → check 20 minutes → record outcome (deterministic based on request data) → release reviewer → exit\n- Resources/initial state: requests are work items; 1 available reviewer initially (then 2 for comparison); reviewer can't check 2 concurrently\n- Branch evidence: eligibility rule is deterministic based on request data\n- Timing: checks 20 min; arrivals 30 min\n- Assumptions/limits: ignore breaks, rework, overrides\n\nThis is quite specific. Let me structure this into a workpiece to be clear about what we have.\n\nFirst consequential construction decision would likely be:\n1. How to represent the two scenarios (1 vs 2 reviewers) - separate nets or parameterized single net?\n2. How to model the deterministic branching outcome\n3. How to model the resource contention for reviewers\n4. How to model the external arrivals\n\nThe most fundamental decision is probably: should we construct two separate nets (one for each reviewer count) or a single parameterized net with a parameter controlling reviewer availability?\n\nThis is consequential because it affects the entire structure.\n\nLet me build the workpiece first.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 80, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:12.001Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "```runbook", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 81, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:13.006Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "-ir\n# Process-Model Workpiece: Approval Request Processing\n\n## Purpose and", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 82, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:13.006Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 83, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:13.006Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "\n\nCompare request approval turnaround time under single-reviewer and dual-reviewer configurations.\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expect", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 84, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:13.006Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ation\n\nOne request from submission through approval or rejection and exit. Comparison horizon: request arrival through completion.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 85, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:14.298Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\nDoes not represent reviewer breaks, rework, priority overrides.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 86, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:14.298Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n- **Trigger:** Request submission\n- **Initial", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 87, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:14.298Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " state:** \n - Scenario A: One available reviewer\n - Scenario B: Two available reviewers\n- **Initial request state:** none (arrivals from outside", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 88, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:14.298Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " the system boundary)\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n**Flowing things:** Request items (", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 89, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:15.665Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "each carries eligibility data deterministically determining approval or rejection outcome)\n\n**Resources:** Reviewers (exclusive", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 90, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:15.665Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "-use resource; each reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently)\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 91, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:15.665Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": ", and resource use\n\n**Reserve request and reviewer**\n- Input: incoming request (consumed/admitted)\n- Resource: one", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 92, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:15.665Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " available reviewer (reserved, held until release)\n- Output: request in review with occupied reviewer\n- Duration: instant", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 93, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:16.832Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "aneous\n\n**Check request**\n- Input: request with eligibility data (read; data remains with request)\n- Resource: occupied reviewer (held)\n- Duration", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 94, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:16.832Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": ": 20 minutes (fixed)\n- Output: request with outcome (approved or rejected, deterministically selected from request", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 95, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:16.832Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " data)\n\n**Record outcome and release reviewer**\n- Input: checked request with outcome (consumed/completed)\n- Resource: occupied reviewer (released back to available pool)\n- Output: approved", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 96, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:17.840Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " or rejected request exits the boundary\n- Duration: instantaneous\n\n### Case and process spine\n\n#### Primary case: Request approval", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 97, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:17.840Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " workflow\n\n**Trigger:** Request arrives at submission boundary\n\n**Ordered account:**\n1. Request and one available reviewer are reserved together", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 98, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:17.840Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "\n2. Reviewer checks request for 20 minutes (occupying that reviewer)\n3. Documented eligibility rule selects outcome (approved or rejected) from request data\n4. Outcome", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 99, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:17.840Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " is recorded; reviewer is released to available pool\n5. Request (approved or rejected) exits the boundary\n\n**Branches:** Two mutually exclusive outcomes (", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 100, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:19.065Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "approved or rejected) after check completes, determined by eligibility rule applied to request data\n\n**Waiting:** Request cannot proceed until a", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 101, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:19.065Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " reviewer is available; waiting occurs at the reserve-request-and-reviewer step when all reviewers are occupied\n\n### Time,", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 102, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:19.065Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n- **Check duration:** 20 minutes (constant, not st", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 103, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:19.065Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ochastic)\n- **Request arrivals:** One at a time, every 30 minutes (constant inter-arrival time; external to", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 104, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:20.306Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " boundary)\n- **Outcomes:** Deterministic selection by documented eligibility rule (no stochasticity in branching)\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 105, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:20.306Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " rules, and contextual regimes\n\n- **Exclusivity:** A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n- **Deterministic outcome:** Eligibility rule uniquely determines each outcome;", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 106, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:20.306Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " no policy override or discretion\n- **No recovery or rework:** Recorded outcome is final; request exits after", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 107, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:20.306Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " recording\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\nFrom supplied account:\n- \"a reviewer reserves", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 108, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:21.601Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " the request and one available reviewer\" → reviewer acquisition is part of case admission\n- \"checks it for 20 minutes\" → 20 ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 109, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:21.601Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "minutes is the sole time input; no variation stated\n- \"records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule\" → outcome is deterministic from", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 110, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:21.601Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " request data\n- \"Recording the outcome releases the reviewer\" → release point is at outcome recording\n- \"requests are distinct work items\" → each request is a separate", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 111, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:22.627Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": ", independent case instance\n- \"A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\" → reviewer is an exclusive-use resource during check\n- \"the documented eligibility rule determin", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 112, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:22.627Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "istically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request\" → branching is non-probabilistic, data-driven\n\n### Normalized account", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 113, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:22.627Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " (working account)\n\nA single request case:\n1. Request arrives; reserves", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 114, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:23.648Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " one available reviewer\n2. Reviewer checks request for 20 minutes\n3. Deterministic outcome (approved or rejected) is recorded based on request data\n4. Reviewer is released\n5. Request exits\n\nScenario variations", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 115, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:23.648Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": ": same process structure, but initial reviewer availability is 1 or 2.\n\n##", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 116, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:23.648Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nNone required; all material facts are supplied.\n\n### Deferred", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 117, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:23.648Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "\n\n**Not deferred, but construction will require decision:** How to represent the two comparison scenarios (single net with", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 118, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:24.978Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " parameterized reviewer count vs. two separate nets). This is not a workpiece gap but a construction representation choice.\n\n## Construction review", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 119, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:24.978Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\nTwo representations are possible:\n1. **Two separate nets:** One net with initial reviewer availability = 1;", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 120, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:24.978Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " a second net with initial reviewer availability = 2. Each can be constructed, simulated, and compared independently.\n2. **Single parameter", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 121, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:24.978Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ized net:** One net with a parameter for reviewer availability, initialized to 1 or 2 by the scenario. Single net structure, multiple sim", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 122, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:26.094Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ulations.\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n- Full operational description of the request", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 123, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:26.094Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " approval process\n- Clear resource contention model (reviewer exclusivity)\n- Deterministic outcome branching rule\n- Timing", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 124, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:26.094Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " (20 min check, 30 min inter-arrival)\n- Two distinct comparison scenarios (initial reviewer count)\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\nNone", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 125, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:26.094Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " for workpiece purposes. All operational facts supplied.\n\n### Net status and tool evidence", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 126, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:27.358Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "\n\nNot yet constructed. Awaiting construction decision on scenario representation.\n```\n\n---\n\n## First Consequential SDCPN", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 127, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:27.358Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " Construction Decision\n\n**Question:** Should the model represent the two approval turnaround comparison scenarios (1 vs. 2 reviewers) as", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 128, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:27.358Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": ":\n\n1. **Two separate nets** — one with reviewer availability initialized to 1, the second with availability initialized to 2, each built and simulated independently to", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 129, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:28.461Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " compare their turnaround times, or\n\n2. **A single parameterized net** — one net structure with a numeric parameter controlling initial reviewer availability, simulated twice", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 130, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:28.461Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " under different parameter values?\n\n**Why this is consequential:** The choice affects whether to construct a single", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 131, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:28.461Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " stable net or to maintain two, whether parameterization is used, and how the comparison simulations will later be run.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 132, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:28.461Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " Both are valid in Petrinaut; the choice rests on the comparison workflow preference", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 133, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:29.001Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": ".\n\nThe workpiece is complete and ready to receive either direction.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 134, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:29.001Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 22862, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8E6Fj3Aso4hpSxL3ZL", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good. Now I have the construction guidance. Let me develop the workpiece from the supplied account, then identify the first consequential construction decision.\n\nThe supplied account is quite complete:\n- Purpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer vs. two\n- Boundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection\n- Case spine: submission → reserve request and reviewer → check 20 minutes → record outcome (deterministic based on request data) → release reviewer → exit\n- Resources/initial state: requests are work items; 1 available reviewer initially (then 2 for comparison); reviewer can't check 2 concurrently\n- Branch evidence: eligibility rule is deterministic based on request data\n- Timing: checks 20 min; arrivals 30 min\n- Assumptions/limits: ignore breaks, rework, overrides\n\nThis is quite specific. Let me structure this into a workpiece to be clear about what we have.\n\nFirst consequential construction decision would likely be:\n1. How to represent the two scenarios (1 vs 2 reviewers) - separate nets or parameterized single net?\n2. How to model the deterministic branching outcome\n3. How to model the resource contention for reviewers\n4. How to model the external arrivals\n\nThe most fundamental decision is probably: should we construct two separate nets (one for each reviewer count) or a single parameterized net with a parameter controlling reviewer availability?\n\nThis is consequential because it affects the entire structure.\n\nLet me build the workpiece first.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "```runbook-ir\n# Process-Model Workpiece: Approval Request Processing\n\n## Purpose and posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\n\nCompare request approval turnaround time under single-reviewer and dual-reviewer configurations.\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n\nOne request from submission through approval or rejection and exit. Comparison horizon: request arrival through completion.\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\nDoes not represent reviewer breaks, rework, priority overrides.\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n- **Trigger:** Request submission\n- **Initial state:** \n - Scenario A: One available reviewer\n - Scenario B: Two available reviewers\n- **Initial request state:** none (arrivals from outside the system boundary)\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n**Flowing things:** Request items (each carries eligibility data deterministically determining approval or rejection outcome)\n\n**Resources:** Reviewers (exclusive-use resource; each reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently)\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\n**Reserve request and reviewer**\n- Input: incoming request (consumed/admitted)\n- Resource: one available reviewer (reserved, held until release)\n- Output: request in review with occupied reviewer\n- Duration: instantaneous\n\n**Check request**\n- Input: request with eligibility data (read; data remains with request)\n- Resource: occupied reviewer (held)\n- Duration: 20 minutes (fixed)\n- Output: request with outcome (approved or rejected, deterministically selected from request data)\n\n**Record outcome and release reviewer**\n- Input: checked request with outcome (consumed/completed)\n- Resource: occupied reviewer (released back to available pool)\n- Output: approved or rejected request exits the boundary\n- Duration: instantaneous\n\n### Case and process spine\n\n#### Primary case: Request approval workflow\n\n**Trigger:** Request arrives at submission boundary\n\n**Ordered account:**\n1. Request and one available reviewer are reserved together\n2. Reviewer checks request for 20 minutes (occupying that reviewer)\n3. Documented eligibility rule selects outcome (approved or rejected) from request data\n4. Outcome is recorded; reviewer is released to available pool\n5. Request (approved or rejected) exits the boundary\n\n**Branches:** Two mutually exclusive outcomes (approved or rejected) after check completes, determined by eligibility rule applied to request data\n\n**Waiting:** Request cannot proceed until a reviewer is available; waiting occurs at the reserve-request-and-reviewer step when all reviewers are occupied\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n- **Check duration:** 20 minutes (constant, not stochastic)\n- **Request arrivals:** One at a time, every 30 minutes (constant inter-arrival time; external to boundary)\n- **Outcomes:** Deterministic selection by documented eligibility rule (no stochasticity in branching)\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\n- **Exclusivity:** A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n- **Deterministic outcome:** Eligibility rule uniquely determines each outcome; no policy override or discretion\n- **No recovery or rework:** Recorded outcome is final; request exits after recording\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\nFrom supplied account:\n- \"a reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer\" → reviewer acquisition is part of case admission\n- \"checks it for 20 minutes\" → 20 minutes is the sole time input; no variation stated\n- \"records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule\" → outcome is deterministic from request data\n- \"Recording the outcome releases the reviewer\" → release point is at outcome recording\n- \"requests are distinct work items\" → each request is a separate, independent case instance\n- \"A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\" → reviewer is an exclusive-use resource during check\n- \"the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request\" → branching is non-probabilistic, data-driven\n\n### Normalized account (working account)\n\nA single request case:\n1. Request arrives; reserves one available reviewer\n2. Reviewer checks request for 20 minutes\n3. Deterministic outcome (approved or rejected) is recorded based on request data\n4. Reviewer is released\n5. Request exits\n\nScenario variations: same process structure, but initial reviewer availability is 1 or 2.\n\n## Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nNone required; all material facts are supplied.\n\n### Deferred\n\n**Not deferred, but construction will require decision:** How to represent the two comparison scenarios (single net with parameterized reviewer count vs. two separate nets). This is not a workpiece gap but a construction representation choice.\n\n## Construction review\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\nTwo representations are possible:\n1. **Two separate nets:** One net with initial reviewer availability = 1; a second net with initial reviewer availability = 2. Each can be constructed, simulated, and compared independently.\n2. **Single parameterized net:** One net with a parameter for reviewer availability, initialized to 1 or 2 by the scenario. Single net structure, multiple simulations.\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n- Full operational description of the request approval process\n- Clear resource contention model (reviewer exclusivity)\n- Deterministic outcome branching rule\n- Timing (20 min check, 30 min inter-arrival)\n- Two distinct comparison scenarios (initial reviewer count)\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\nNone for workpiece purposes. All operational facts supplied.\n\n### Net status and tool evidence\n\nNot yet constructed. Awaiting construction decision on scenario representation.\n```\n\n---\n\n## First Consequential SDCPN Construction Decision\n\n**Question:** Should the model represent the two approval turnaround comparison scenarios (1 vs. 2 reviewers) as:\n\n1. **Two separate nets** — one with reviewer availability initialized to 1, the second with availability initialized to 2, each built and simulated independently to compare their turnaround times, or\n\n2. **A single parameterized net** — one net structure with a numeric parameter controlling initial reviewer availability, simulated twice under different parameter values?\n\n**Why this is consequential:** The choice affects whether to construct a single stable net or to maintain two, whether parameterization is used, and how the comparison simulations will later be run. Both are valid in Petrinaut; the choice rests on the comparison workflow preference.\n\nThe workpiece is complete and ready to receive either direction." + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 14, + "output": 1819, + "cacheRead": 4155, + "cacheWrite": 3786, + "totalTokens": 9774, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000014, + "output": 0.009095, + "cacheRead": 0.0004155, + "cacheWrite": 0.0047325, + "total": 0.014256999999999999 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 135, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:29.017Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good. Now I have the construction guidance. Let me develop the workpiece from the supplied account, then identify the first consequential construction decision.\n\nThe supplied account is quite complete:\n- Purpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer vs. two\n- Boundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection\n- Case spine: submission → reserve request and reviewer → check 20 minutes → record outcome (deterministic based on request data) → release reviewer → exit\n- Resources/initial state: requests are work items; 1 available reviewer initially (then 2 for comparison); reviewer can't check 2 concurrently\n- Branch evidence: eligibility rule is deterministic based on request data\n- Timing: checks 20 min; arrivals 30 min\n- Assumptions/limits: ignore breaks, rework, overrides\n\nThis is quite specific. Let me structure this into a workpiece to be clear about what we have.\n\nFirst consequential construction decision would likely be:\n1. How to represent the two scenarios (1 vs 2 reviewers) - separate nets or parameterized single net?\n2. How to model the deterministic branching outcome\n3. How to model the resource contention for reviewers\n4. How to model the external arrivals\n\nThe most fundamental decision is probably: should we construct two separate nets (one for each reviewer count) or a single parameterized net with a parameter controlling reviewer availability?\n\nThis is consequential because it affects the entire structure.\n\nLet me build the workpiece first.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "```runbook-ir\n# Process-Model Workpiece: Approval Request Processing\n\n## Purpose and posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\n\nCompare request approval turnaround time under single-reviewer and dual-reviewer configurations.\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n\nOne request from submission through approval or rejection and exit. Comparison horizon: request arrival through completion.\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\nDoes not represent reviewer breaks, rework, priority overrides.\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n- **Trigger:** Request submission\n- **Initial state:** \n - Scenario A: One available reviewer\n - Scenario B: Two available reviewers\n- **Initial request state:** none (arrivals from outside the system boundary)\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n**Flowing things:** Request items (each carries eligibility data deterministically determining approval or rejection outcome)\n\n**Resources:** Reviewers (exclusive-use resource; each reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently)\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\n**Reserve request and reviewer**\n- Input: incoming request (consumed/admitted)\n- Resource: one available reviewer (reserved, held until release)\n- Output: request in review with occupied reviewer\n- Duration: instantaneous\n\n**Check request**\n- Input: request with eligibility data (read; data remains with request)\n- Resource: occupied reviewer (held)\n- Duration: 20 minutes (fixed)\n- Output: request with outcome (approved or rejected, deterministically selected from request data)\n\n**Record outcome and release reviewer**\n- Input: checked request with outcome (consumed/completed)\n- Resource: occupied reviewer (released back to available pool)\n- Output: approved or rejected request exits the boundary\n- Duration: instantaneous\n\n### Case and process spine\n\n#### Primary case: Request approval workflow\n\n**Trigger:** Request arrives at submission boundary\n\n**Ordered account:**\n1. Request and one available reviewer are reserved together\n2. Reviewer checks request for 20 minutes (occupying that reviewer)\n3. Documented eligibility rule selects outcome (approved or rejected) from request data\n4. Outcome is recorded; reviewer is released to available pool\n5. Request (approved or rejected) exits the boundary\n\n**Branches:** Two mutually exclusive outcomes (approved or rejected) after check completes, determined by eligibility rule applied to request data\n\n**Waiting:** Request cannot proceed until a reviewer is available; waiting occurs at the reserve-request-and-reviewer step when all reviewers are occupied\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n- **Check duration:** 20 minutes (constant, not stochastic)\n- **Request arrivals:** One at a time, every 30 minutes (constant inter-arrival time; external to boundary)\n- **Outcomes:** Deterministic selection by documented eligibility rule (no stochasticity in branching)\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\n- **Exclusivity:** A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n- **Deterministic outcome:** Eligibility rule uniquely determines each outcome; no policy override or discretion\n- **No recovery or rework:** Recorded outcome is final; request exits after recording\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\nFrom supplied account:\n- \"a reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer\" → reviewer acquisition is part of case admission\n- \"checks it for 20 minutes\" → 20 minutes is the sole time input; no variation stated\n- \"records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule\" → outcome is deterministic from request data\n- \"Recording the outcome releases the reviewer\" → release point is at outcome recording\n- \"requests are distinct work items\" → each request is a separate, independent case instance\n- \"A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\" → reviewer is an exclusive-use resource during check\n- \"the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request\" → branching is non-probabilistic, data-driven\n\n### Normalized account (working account)\n\nA single request case:\n1. Request arrives; reserves one available reviewer\n2. Reviewer checks request for 20 minutes\n3. Deterministic outcome (approved or rejected) is recorded based on request data\n4. Reviewer is released\n5. Request exits\n\nScenario variations: same process structure, but initial reviewer availability is 1 or 2.\n\n## Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nNone required; all material facts are supplied.\n\n### Deferred\n\n**Not deferred, but construction will require decision:** How to represent the two comparison scenarios (single net with parameterized reviewer count vs. two separate nets). This is not a workpiece gap but a construction representation choice.\n\n## Construction review\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\nTwo representations are possible:\n1. **Two separate nets:** One net with initial reviewer availability = 1; a second net with initial reviewer availability = 2. Each can be constructed, simulated, and compared independently.\n2. **Single parameterized net:** One net with a parameter for reviewer availability, initialized to 1 or 2 by the scenario. Single net structure, multiple simulations.\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n- Full operational description of the request approval process\n- Clear resource contention model (reviewer exclusivity)\n- Deterministic outcome branching rule\n- Timing (20 min check, 30 min inter-arrival)\n- Two distinct comparison scenarios (initial reviewer count)\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\nNone for workpiece purposes. All operational facts supplied.\n\n### Net status and tool evidence\n\nNot yet constructed. Awaiting construction decision on scenario representation.\n```\n\n---\n\n## First Consequential SDCPN Construction Decision\n\n**Question:** Should the model represent the two approval turnaround comparison scenarios (1 vs. 2 reviewers) as:\n\n1. **Two separate nets** — one with reviewer availability initialized to 1, the second with availability initialized to 2, each built and simulated independently to compare their turnaround times, or\n\n2. **A single parameterized net** — one net structure with a numeric parameter controlling initial reviewer availability, simulated twice under different parameter values?\n\n**Why this is consequential:** The choice affects whether to construct a single stable net or to maintain two, whether parameterization is used, and how the comparison simulations will later be run. Both are valid in Petrinaut; the choice rests on the comparison workflow preference.\n\nThe workpiece is complete and ready to receive either direction." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 14, + "output": 1819, + "cacheRead": 4155, + "cacheWrite": 3786, + "totalTokens": 9774, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000014, + "output": 0.009095, + "cacheRead": 0.0004155, + "cacheWrite": 0.0047325, + "total": 0.014256999999999999 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 338 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284226156, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8E6Fj3Aso4hpSxL3ZL", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 136, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:29.018Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0QJKBM4DSDR95TBXEP3AQ", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good. Now I have the construction guidance. Let me develop the workpiece from the supplied account, then identify the first consequential construction decision.\n\nThe supplied account is quite complete:\n- Purpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer vs. two\n- Boundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection\n- Case spine: submission → reserve request and reviewer → check 20 minutes → record outcome (deterministic based on request data) → release reviewer → exit\n- Resources/initial state: requests are work items; 1 available reviewer initially (then 2 for comparison); reviewer can't check 2 concurrently\n- Branch evidence: eligibility rule is deterministic based on request data\n- Timing: checks 20 min; arrivals 30 min\n- Assumptions/limits: ignore breaks, rework, overrides\n\nThis is quite specific. Let me structure this into a workpiece to be clear about what we have.\n\nFirst consequential construction decision would likely be:\n1. How to represent the two scenarios (1 vs 2 reviewers) - separate nets or parameterized single net?\n2. How to model the deterministic branching outcome\n3. How to model the resource contention for reviewers\n4. How to model the external arrivals\n\nThe most fundamental decision is probably: should we construct two separate nets (one for each reviewer count) or a single parameterized net with a parameter controlling reviewer availability?\n\nThis is consequential because it affects the entire structure.\n\nLet me build the workpiece first.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "```runbook-ir\n# Process-Model Workpiece: Approval Request Processing\n\n## Purpose and posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\n\nCompare request approval turnaround time under single-reviewer and dual-reviewer configurations.\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n\nOne request from submission through approval or rejection and exit. Comparison horizon: request arrival through completion.\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\nDoes not represent reviewer breaks, rework, priority overrides.\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n- **Trigger:** Request submission\n- **Initial state:** \n - Scenario A: One available reviewer\n - Scenario B: Two available reviewers\n- **Initial request state:** none (arrivals from outside the system boundary)\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n**Flowing things:** Request items (each carries eligibility data deterministically determining approval or rejection outcome)\n\n**Resources:** Reviewers (exclusive-use resource; each reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently)\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\n**Reserve request and reviewer**\n- Input: incoming request (consumed/admitted)\n- Resource: one available reviewer (reserved, held until release)\n- Output: request in review with occupied reviewer\n- Duration: instantaneous\n\n**Check request**\n- Input: request with eligibility data (read; data remains with request)\n- Resource: occupied reviewer (held)\n- Duration: 20 minutes (fixed)\n- Output: request with outcome (approved or rejected, deterministically selected from request data)\n\n**Record outcome and release reviewer**\n- Input: checked request with outcome (consumed/completed)\n- Resource: occupied reviewer (released back to available pool)\n- Output: approved or rejected request exits the boundary\n- Duration: instantaneous\n\n### Case and process spine\n\n#### Primary case: Request approval workflow\n\n**Trigger:** Request arrives at submission boundary\n\n**Ordered account:**\n1. Request and one available reviewer are reserved together\n2. Reviewer checks request for 20 minutes (occupying that reviewer)\n3. Documented eligibility rule selects outcome (approved or rejected) from request data\n4. Outcome is recorded; reviewer is released to available pool\n5. Request (approved or rejected) exits the boundary\n\n**Branches:** Two mutually exclusive outcomes (approved or rejected) after check completes, determined by eligibility rule applied to request data\n\n**Waiting:** Request cannot proceed until a reviewer is available; waiting occurs at the reserve-request-and-reviewer step when all reviewers are occupied\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n- **Check duration:** 20 minutes (constant, not stochastic)\n- **Request arrivals:** One at a time, every 30 minutes (constant inter-arrival time; external to boundary)\n- **Outcomes:** Deterministic selection by documented eligibility rule (no stochasticity in branching)\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\n- **Exclusivity:** A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n- **Deterministic outcome:** Eligibility rule uniquely determines each outcome; no policy override or discretion\n- **No recovery or rework:** Recorded outcome is final; request exits after recording\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\nFrom supplied account:\n- \"a reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer\" → reviewer acquisition is part of case admission\n- \"checks it for 20 minutes\" → 20 minutes is the sole time input; no variation stated\n- \"records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule\" → outcome is deterministic from request data\n- \"Recording the outcome releases the reviewer\" → release point is at outcome recording\n- \"requests are distinct work items\" → each request is a separate, independent case instance\n- \"A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\" → reviewer is an exclusive-use resource during check\n- \"the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request\" → branching is non-probabilistic, data-driven\n\n### Normalized account (working account)\n\nA single request case:\n1. Request arrives; reserves one available reviewer\n2. Reviewer checks request for 20 minutes\n3. Deterministic outcome (approved or rejected) is recorded based on request data\n4. Reviewer is released\n5. Request exits\n\nScenario variations: same process structure, but initial reviewer availability is 1 or 2.\n\n## Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nNone required; all material facts are supplied.\n\n### Deferred\n\n**Not deferred, but construction will require decision:** How to represent the two comparison scenarios (single net with parameterized reviewer count vs. two separate nets). This is not a workpiece gap but a construction representation choice.\n\n## Construction review\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\nTwo representations are possible:\n1. **Two separate nets:** One net with initial reviewer availability = 1; a second net with initial reviewer availability = 2. Each can be constructed, simulated, and compared independently.\n2. **Single parameterized net:** One net with a parameter for reviewer availability, initialized to 1 or 2 by the scenario. Single net structure, multiple simulations.\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n- Full operational description of the request approval process\n- Clear resource contention model (reviewer exclusivity)\n- Deterministic outcome branching rule\n- Timing (20 min check, 30 min inter-arrival)\n- Two distinct comparison scenarios (initial reviewer count)\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\nNone for workpiece purposes. All operational facts supplied.\n\n### Net status and tool evidence\n\nNot yet constructed. Awaiting construction decision on scenario representation.\n```\n\n---\n\n## First Consequential SDCPN Construction Decision\n\n**Question:** Should the model represent the two approval turnaround comparison scenarios (1 vs. 2 reviewers) as:\n\n1. **Two separate nets** — one with reviewer availability initialized to 1, the second with availability initialized to 2, each built and simulated independently to compare their turnaround times, or\n\n2. **A single parameterized net** — one net structure with a numeric parameter controlling initial reviewer availability, simulated twice under different parameter values?\n\n**Why this is consequential:** The choice affects whether to construct a single stable net or to maintain two, whether parameterization is used, and how the comparison simulations will later be run. Both are valid in Petrinaut; the choice rests on the comparison workflow preference.\n\nThe workpiece is complete and ready to receive either direction." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 14, + "output": 1819, + "cacheRead": 4155, + "cacheWrite": 3786, + "totalTokens": 9774, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000014, + "output": 0.009095, + "cacheRead": 0.0004155, + "cacheWrite": 0.0047325, + "total": 0.014256999999999999 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 338 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284226156, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8E6Fj3Aso4hpSxL3ZL", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 137, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:29.018Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to:\n1. Use the account they've supplied as complete modelling input\n2. Not interview them\n3. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n4. Not mutate a net\n\nThey've provided:\n- Purpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two\n- Boundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection\n- Case spine (operational description): submission → reserve request and reviewer → check for 20 minutes → record outcome (approved/rejected based on documented rule) → release reviewer → exit\n- Resources and initial state: requests are work items; initially 1 available reviewer; comparison changes to 2; reviewer can't check 2 concurrently\n- Branch evidence: documented eligibility rule is deterministic based on request data\n- Timing: checks are 20 minutes; arrivals every 30 minutes\n- Assumptions and limits: ignore breaks, rework, priority overrides\n\nI need to:\n1. Activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first\n2. Develop a workpiece based on this account\n3. Identify the first consequential SDCPN construction decision\n4. State it clearly\n5. Stop without building/mutating a net\n\nLet me activate the skill first.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01DvYPKfT9R6qKjq1dGpRfcK", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2635, + "output": 348, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 2983, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0026349999999999998, + "output": 0.0017400000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.004375 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 286 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284220040, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8DdwwP56m9hcLufSJx", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01DvYPKfT9R6qKjq1dGpRfcK", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284222887 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, I've activated the skill. Now I need to follow the construct-only branch because the user said \"Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me.\"\n\nAccording to the skill instructions:\n- I should use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input\n- Do not interview\n- Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`\n- Use mounted construction tools\n- If a consequential gap prevents construction, report it; don't ask\n\nThe user also says \"Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\"\n\nSo I need to:\n1. Develop a workpiece from the supplied account\n2. Identify the first consequential construction decision\n3. State it\n4. Stop without building anything\n\nLet me first read the workpiece template to understand how to structure this, then the pn-construction guidance to understand construction decisions.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_013vmvbmBayzxhXJ84W9DDfJ", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01UFZbgEp6irMUxeaMhrp7q1", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 376, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4155, + "totalTokens": 4543, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.0018800000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.00519375, + "total": 0.00708575 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 206 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284222890, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8Dr1imEEshFWMAbrxq", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_013vmvbmBayzxhXJ84W9DDfJ", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Process-Model Workpiece and Recording Contract\n\nThe workpiece is the shared, recoverable operational account. Elicitation and revision maintain it; construction consumes it. The transcript remains evidence, not the primary model.\n\nFollow the person's thread during conversation and file material into the workpiece afterward. Its headings are recording homes, not question order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose, while keeping consequential omissions visible.\n\n## Recording distinctions\n\nUse these distinctions wherever they carry information; they are not mandatory labels on every sentence:\n\n- **Expert evidence** — What the person said, preserving consequential vocabulary, hedges, context, and source regime.\n- **Working account** — The current normalized operational description accepted for use.\n- **Agent inference** — An interpretation of evidence, visibly attributed to the agent.\n- **Assumed** — A value or structure proposed by the agent, with its reason, consequence, and route to checking.\n- **Unknown** — Asked, but the person does not know.\n- **Not yet asked** — Relevant and identified, but not yet addressed.\n- **Deferred** — Left for later, with why it matters and a named source or route to an answer.\n- **Declined** — The person chose not to answer or include it.\n- **Conflict** — Accounts cannot yet be used together; preserve both and what could distinguish them.\n- **Correction** — A current account that replaces an earlier one, retaining enough history to explain the change without leaving both active.\n- **Contextual coexistence** — Different accounts apply under different people, times, modes, directions, policies, or operating conditions.\n- **Omitted** — Deliberately outside the model, with why the purpose permits the omission.\n- **Target loss** — Supported operational meaning the SDCPN or current tools cannot faithfully carry.\n\nEvidence and precision are independent. “About three hours” may be supported but coarse; an exact agent-supplied value may be precise-looking but unsupported.\n\nKeep one authoritative home for each active claim. Do not accumulate competing summaries. When a later statement differs, establish whether it is a correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before updating the working account.\n\n## Workpiece template\n\n```markdown\n# Process-Model Workpiece\n\n## Purpose and posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\n\n### Who will use it and how\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n\n### Available time and assumption appetite\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; record its ordering in the process spine.\n\n### Case and process spine\n\nGive the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary: what admits the case, what flows, which activities occur and in what order, what changes the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the work and resources, and what outcome or handoff ends it.\n\n#### Primary case: \n\n##### Trigger or admission\n\n##### Ordered account and references\n\n##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes\n\n##### Objective dependencies\n\n#### Additional or contrasting case: \n\nAdd only when a different case exposes consequential structure the primary case does not.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\n### Validation evidence and data sources\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\nKeep evidence beside affected process material where practical. Use this section for evidence spanning several parts of the account or whose relationship needs explanation.\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\n### Normalized account\n\n### Agent inferences and proposed structure\n\n## Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nFor each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked.\n\n### Unknown to the person\n\n### Not yet asked\n\n### Declined\n\n### Deferred and deposits\n\nFor each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it.\n\n### Ambiguities and conflicts\n\nPreserve alternatives and the evidence for each. Do not choose or average without support.\n\n### Corrections\n\nState the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active.\n\n### Contextual coexistence\n\nPreserve accounts differing by person, time, condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one.\n\n### Deliberate omissions and simplifications\n\nState what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong.\n\n## Construction review\n\nOpen this section only when construction begins.\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\n### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults\n\n### Questions reopened by construction\n\n### Target-representation and tooling losses\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\n### Net status and tool evidence\n```\n\n## Maintenance\n\n- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions.\n- Update the authoritative process spine when ordering or case behavior changes; reference activity and resource entries rather than duplicating their local details.\n- A restatement offered by the agent remains normalization even when accepted. Preserve exact evidence separately where origin matters.\n- For a genuine correction, update the active account and record what changed. For conflict or contextual coexistence, keep the alternatives and their unresolved or selecting conditions visible.\n- Remove irrelevant empty sections. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, or **Omitted** only when that state matters to later work.\n- If construction requires transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that boundary.\n- Record whether no construction was attempted, construction was blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md", + "lines": 154 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284226152 + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01UFZbgEp6irMUxeaMhrp7q1", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# SDCPN Construction\n\nRead this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model.\n\nConstruction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete.\n\n## Construction boundary\n\nBefore constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path.\n\nWhen Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net.\n\n## Mapping principles\n\n| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation |\n| --- | --- |\n| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior |\n| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable |\n| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it |\n| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes |\n| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state |\n| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior |\n| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential |\n| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece |\n| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them |\n\nA physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node.\n\n## Petrinaut tool sequence\n\nWhen the corresponding tools are mounted:\n\n1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net.\n2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`.\n3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them.\n4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes.\n5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end.\n6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial.\n\nThe mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields.\n\n## Construction patterns\n\nPatterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts.\n\n### Timed work\n\nWhen a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail.\n\n### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nRepresent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap.\n\n### Contended resource\n\nHold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return.\n\nCompile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded.\n\n### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\n- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records.\n- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release.\n- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work.\n\nConfirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning.\n\n### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nRepresent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate.\n\n### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nRepresent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum.\n\n### Mode change\n\nRepresent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs.\n\n### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nRepresent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset.\n\n### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nCarry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior.\n\n### Spatial transfer\n\nRepresent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported.\n\n### Hidden waiting\n\nDerive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object.\n\n## Inference, approximation, and target loss\n\nName every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece.\n\nPotentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible:\n\n- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order;\n- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value;\n- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose;\n- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and\n- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning.\n\nNot acceptable:\n\n- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge;\n- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values;\n- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution;\n- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior;\n- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or\n- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence.\n\nRecord workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification.\n\n## Existing-net analysis and bounded change\n\nStart from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta.\n\nDo not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones.\n\nAfter a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md", + "lines": 128 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284226152 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good. Now I have the construction guidance. Let me develop the workpiece from the supplied account, then identify the first consequential construction decision.\n\nThe supplied account is quite complete:\n- Purpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer vs. two\n- Boundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection\n- Case spine: submission → reserve request and reviewer → check 20 minutes → record outcome (deterministic based on request data) → release reviewer → exit\n- Resources/initial state: requests are work items; 1 available reviewer initially (then 2 for comparison); reviewer can't check 2 concurrently\n- Branch evidence: eligibility rule is deterministic based on request data\n- Timing: checks 20 min; arrivals 30 min\n- Assumptions/limits: ignore breaks, rework, overrides\n\nThis is quite specific. Let me structure this into a workpiece to be clear about what we have.\n\nFirst consequential construction decision would likely be:\n1. How to represent the two scenarios (1 vs 2 reviewers) - separate nets or parameterized single net?\n2. How to model the deterministic branching outcome\n3. How to model the resource contention for reviewers\n4. How to model the external arrivals\n\nThe most fundamental decision is probably: should we construct two separate nets (one for each reviewer count) or a single parameterized net with a parameter controlling reviewer availability?\n\nThis is consequential because it affects the entire structure.\n\nLet me build the workpiece first.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "```runbook-ir\n# Process-Model Workpiece: Approval Request Processing\n\n## Purpose and posture\n\n### What the model must answer, compare, or support\n\nCompare request approval turnaround time under single-reviewer and dual-reviewer configurations.\n\n### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation\n\nOne request from submission through approval or rejection and exit. Comparison horizon: request arrival through completion.\n\n### What the result must not claim\n\nDoes not represent reviewer breaks, rework, priority overrides.\n\n## Operational account\n\n### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state\n\n- **Trigger:** Request submission\n- **Initial state:** \n - Scenario A: One available reviewer\n - Scenario B: Two available reviewers\n- **Initial request state:** none (arrivals from outside the system boundary)\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\n**Flowing things:** Request items (each carries eligibility data deterministically determining approval or rejection outcome)\n\n**Resources:** Reviewers (exclusive-use resource; each reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently)\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\n**Reserve request and reviewer**\n- Input: incoming request (consumed/admitted)\n- Resource: one available reviewer (reserved, held until release)\n- Output: request in review with occupied reviewer\n- Duration: instantaneous\n\n**Check request**\n- Input: request with eligibility data (read; data remains with request)\n- Resource: occupied reviewer (held)\n- Duration: 20 minutes (fixed)\n- Output: request with outcome (approved or rejected, deterministically selected from request data)\n\n**Record outcome and release reviewer**\n- Input: checked request with outcome (consumed/completed)\n- Resource: occupied reviewer (released back to available pool)\n- Output: approved or rejected request exits the boundary\n- Duration: instantaneous\n\n### Case and process spine\n\n#### Primary case: Request approval workflow\n\n**Trigger:** Request arrives at submission boundary\n\n**Ordered account:**\n1. Request and one available reviewer are reserved together\n2. Reviewer checks request for 20 minutes (occupying that reviewer)\n3. Documented eligibility rule selects outcome (approved or rejected) from request data\n4. Outcome is recorded; reviewer is released to available pool\n5. Request (approved or rejected) exits the boundary\n\n**Branches:** Two mutually exclusive outcomes (approved or rejected) after check completes, determined by eligibility rule applied to request data\n\n**Waiting:** Request cannot proceed until a reviewer is available; waiting occurs at the reserve-request-and-reviewer step when all reviewers are occupied\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\n- **Check duration:** 20 minutes (constant, not stochastic)\n- **Request arrivals:** One at a time, every 30 minutes (constant inter-arrival time; external to boundary)\n- **Outcomes:** Deterministic selection by documented eligibility rule (no stochasticity in branching)\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\n- **Exclusivity:** A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\n- **Deterministic outcome:** Eligibility rule uniquely determines each outcome; no policy override or discretion\n- **No recovery or rework:** Recorded outcome is final; request exits after recording\n\n## Evidence and interpretation\n\n### Exact expert evidence\n\nFrom supplied account:\n- \"a reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer\" → reviewer acquisition is part of case admission\n- \"checks it for 20 minutes\" → 20 minutes is the sole time input; no variation stated\n- \"records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule\" → outcome is deterministic from request data\n- \"Recording the outcome releases the reviewer\" → release point is at outcome recording\n- \"requests are distinct work items\" → each request is a separate, independent case instance\n- \"A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently\" → reviewer is an exclusive-use resource during check\n- \"the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request\" → branching is non-probabilistic, data-driven\n\n### Normalized account (working account)\n\nA single request case:\n1. Request arrives; reserves one available reviewer\n2. Reviewer checks request for 20 minutes\n3. Deterministic outcome (approved or rejected) is recorded based on request data\n4. Reviewer is released\n5. Request exits\n\nScenario variations: same process structure, but initial reviewer availability is 1 or 2.\n\n## Open matters and authorship\n\n### Assumptions\n\nNone required; all material facts are supplied.\n\n### Deferred\n\n**Not deferred, but construction will require decision:** How to represent the two comparison scenarios (single net with parameterized reviewer count vs. two separate nets). This is not a workpiece gap but a construction representation choice.\n\n## Construction review\n\n### Candidate target structures\n\nTwo representations are possible:\n1. **Two separate nets:** One net with initial reviewer availability = 1; a second net with initial reviewer availability = 2. Each can be constructed, simulated, and compared independently.\n2. **Single parameterized net:** One net with a parameter for reviewer availability, initialized to 1 or 2 by the scenario. Single net structure, multiple simulations.\n\n## Delivery status\n\n### What this workpiece currently supports\n\n- Full operational description of the request approval process\n- Clear resource contention model (reviewer exclusivity)\n- Deterministic outcome branching rule\n- Timing (20 min check, 30 min inter-arrival)\n- Two distinct comparison scenarios (initial reviewer count)\n\n### Consequential gaps\n\nNone for workpiece purposes. All operational facts supplied.\n\n### Net status and tool evidence\n\nNot yet constructed. Awaiting construction decision on scenario representation.\n```\n\n---\n\n## First Consequential SDCPN Construction Decision\n\n**Question:** Should the model represent the two approval turnaround comparison scenarios (1 vs. 2 reviewers) as:\n\n1. **Two separate nets** — one with reviewer availability initialized to 1, the second with availability initialized to 2, each built and simulated independently to compare their turnaround times, or\n\n2. **A single parameterized net** — one net structure with a numeric parameter controlling initial reviewer availability, simulated twice under different parameter values?\n\n**Why this is consequential:** The choice affects whether to construct a single stable net or to maintain two, whether parameterization is used, and how the comparison simulations will later be run. Both are valid in Petrinaut; the choice rests on the comparison workflow preference.\n\nThe workpiece is complete and ready to receive either direction." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 14, + "output": 1819, + "cacheRead": 4155, + "cacheWrite": 3786, + "totalTokens": 9774, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000014, + "output": 0.009095, + "cacheRead": 0.0004155, + "cacheWrite": 0.0047325, + "total": 0.014256999999999999 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 338 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284226156, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8E6Fj3Aso4hpSxL3ZL", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 138, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:29.018Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 28996, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 139, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:29.019Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0QCK1V8YGTA3F23VHPH7Y", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0QCKQHVCHTJVG11TJK92S", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 140, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:29.019Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0QCJYYFR6GMX9WH3XF1V6", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "0b7afc4e1455200b4a0618566c47a4f7a10cfdb33b2bc23686d2bac5f7ea2d5e", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 141, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:29.019Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "d2d42344c40ddeb2471eeeba437032079bd2c7083afdbc2f9de5e823f841d5b8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "ebec2ac5faab6cbbbe26eeeebc2d7ac0ba7dc637fd43ea9b5917f8e0277f5515", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "c7cb5b2222b0d1b5aff861c4056f41ba8825aca284ec774d8e4f0fbf12807314", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "321f8405c12374315d61caf466001d6b4b5cf68b04325df77a7948daaa680de1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/scenarios.json": "1844df940b8de9d10d28e9537f966920aba581b36956a9ac26a3767824ca96cb", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/protocol.md": "ef1443bb02c6c26d4ded6edf9e023579bc32cdc394f90490edfb34eaf32b8ed2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md": "8cd2749c8292f01045ab4282fc7248c07046cecaf14a586a9ef286e2876cf8bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md": "82b035268c07cc8ee4736b5ffdd392c8f153793d2ca6b9ed57271c9b6146de10", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md": "8826b85d32d6c24fbc8f678ec394600676ec61c4a0b83d0a9cfa16be87fc5d76", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "1a2417cc5f9649d459c5efbc87cd3242db99a9717622a6d86073c72835818865" + }, + "promptSelection": { + "candidateCorePromptIncluded": true, + "v3SdcpnAppendIncluded": true, + "legacyCorePromptIncluded": false, + "legacyRoleMarkerIncluded": false, + "initialSystemPromptSha256": "ad472c3919f1857f1f5f02f83bf0adb83c4795808e44f2b58813b158585b61f7" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "candidateCorePrompt": "6a458c0bbbc9dee5b4454a54b032818227ab681ba9f7beaa60d4fe9628f6eb41", + "v3SdcpnAppend": "73cac46487d33051a90cc487ea7abfc11fec4b049af11a108396ec08d44569fb", + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S3-independent-r1.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S3-independent-r1.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d56988b6d42 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S3-independent-r1.json @@ -0,0 +1,2024 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v3-independent-s3-b18f4390", + "phase": "paid", + "instrumentVersion": "v3", + "candidate": "independent", + "scenarioId": "S3", + "scenario": { + "title": "Review with a resolvable target defect", + "prompt": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token.", + "stopAfter": "The first supported defect finding.", + "expected": "Identify the missing reviewer return on rejection without loading universal elicitation." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "## Defect Identification\n\n**First formalism-specific defect:** RecordRejection consumes a reviewer token from CheckInProgress without returning it to AvailableReviewer.\n\n**Evidence:**\n- Operational requirement: \"The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval **or rejection** is recorded.\"\n- Target structure: RecordRejection has an input arc from CheckInProgress but \"has no output arc returning the reviewer token.\"\n- Consequence in SDCPN semantics: When RecordRejection fires, the token representing the reviewer is consumed without being produced by any output arc. The reviewer is permanently removed from the system rather than cycling back to availability.\n\nThis creates asymmetric behavior: RecordApproval returns the token via an explicit arc to AvailableReviewer, but RecordRejection loses it. The net cannot satisfy the operational requirement that rejection also restores reviewer availability.", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling", "elicitation"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "toolu_01ThbBDCA5MVxSvd7y8eyNFV", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 6602, + "inputTokens": 2590, + "outputTokens": 528, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 3118, + "cost": 0.00523 + }, + { + "durationMs": 6640, + "inputTokens": 12, + "outputTokens": 549, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4247, + "totalTokens": 4808, + "cost": 0.00806575 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 13242, + "inputTokens": 2602, + "outputTokens": 1077, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4247, + "totalTokens": 7926, + "cost": 0.01329575 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nReview the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token.\n\n## Assistant\n## Defect Identification\n\n**First formalism-specific defect:** RecordRejection consumes a reviewer token from CheckInProgress without returning it to AvailableReviewer.\n\n**Evidence:**\n- Operational requirement: \"The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval **or rejection** is recorded.\"\n- Target structure: RecordRejection has an input arc from CheckInProgress but \"has no output arc returning the reviewer token.\"\n- Consequence in SDCPN semantics: When RecordRejection fires, the token representing the reviewer is consumed without being produced by any output arc. The reviewer is permanently removed from the system rather than cycling back to availability.\n\nThis creates asymmetric behavior: RecordApproval returns the token via an explicit arc to AvailableReviewer, but RecordRejection loses it. The net cannot satisfy the operational requirement that rejection also restores reviewer availability.\n- tool activate_skill (toolu_01ThbBDCA5MVxSvd7y8eyNFV): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\\n\\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\\n\\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\\n\\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\\n\\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000027", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFGMFJQNzBCRjI2NjZQN0g0WU0yUDY0", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1F0RQ0D0QQMFX08XNDMGJ43", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RP818CG7R5C63MV8DV7C", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The user wants me to review an operational account against a target description to identify formalism-specific defects. They explicitly ask me to:\n1. Stop after identifying the first defect\n2. Show evidence for it\n3. Not interview them or mutate a net\n\nThe operational account describes a process where:\n- Each request check reserves one reviewer at start\n- The reviewer is unavailable during the check\n- The reviewer becomes available again when approval OR rejection is recorded\n\nThe target description describes a Petri net structure:\n- AvailableReviewer supplies reviewer token to StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n- RecordApproval returns the token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nLet me analyze this against SDCPN formalism and the operational intent:\n\nThe problem is clear: RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress (which holds the reviewer token) but has no output arc returning the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer. This means when rejection is recorded, the reviewer token is lost - it becomes unavailable permanently.\n\nAccording to the operational account: \"The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nThe target allows approval to return the token via RecordApproval → AvailableReviewer, but rejection (RecordRejection) consumes the token without returning it.\n\nThis is a clear formalism-specific defect: the net structure violates the operational requirement that rejection should also return the reviewer to availability. In SDCPN terms, the token representing the reviewer is consumed by RecordRejection without being generated by any output arc, creating a permanent loss of a resource token.\n\nThis is an evidence-based structural defect that I can identify directly from the account and target description without needing to interview the user or construct anything.\nI should pull up the sdcpn-modelling skill given this falls squarely in SDCPN territory, then move into stating the defect.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01ThbBDCA5MVxSvd7y8eyNFV", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 3 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I need to identify the defect. The user has given me:\n\n1. An operational account (what the system should do)\n2. A target description (the Petri net structure proposed)\n\nI need to compare them and find the first formalism-specific defect.\n\nOperational requirement: \"The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nTarget structure:\n- AvailableReviewer → (arc) → StartCheck (supplies reviewer token)\n- CheckInProgress → (arc) → RecordApproval (supplies the held reviewer token)\n- RecordApproval → (arc) → AvailableReviewer (returns token)\n- RecordRejection ← (arc) ← CheckInProgress (consumes token)\n- RecordRejection → ??? (has no output arc)\n\nThe defect: RecordRejection consumes the reviewer token from CheckInProgress but does not return it to AvailableReviewer. This violates the operational requirement that the reviewer should become available again when rejection is recorded.\n\nIn SDCPN terms, this is a token conservation problem: the reviewer token is consumed by RecordRejection but never produced anywhere, so reviewers are permanently removed from the available pool when rejected rather than cycling back to availability.\n\nThis is the first and most critical formalism-specific defect, and I have clear evidence for it from the target description.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "## Defect Identification\n\n**First formalism-specific defect:** RecordRejection consumes a reviewer token from CheckInProgress without returning it to AvailableReviewer.\n\n**Evidence:**\n- Operational requirement: \"The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval **or rejection** is recorded.\"\n- Target structure: RecordRejection has an input arc from CheckInProgress but \"has no output arc returning the reviewer token.\"\n- Consequence in SDCPN semantics: When RecordRejection fires, the token representing the reviewer is consumed without being produced by any output arc. The reviewer is permanently removed from the system rather than cycling back to availability.\n\nThis creates asymmetric behavior: RecordApproval returns the token via an explicit arc to AvailableReviewer, but RecordRejection loses it. The net cannot satisfy the operational requirement that rejection also restores reviewer availability.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1F0RP715RP9G182WR065VEF" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:42.626Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:42.629Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:42.651Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:42.657Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RP818CG7R5C63MV8DV7C", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:42.657Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RP818CG7R5C63MV8DV7C", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:42.657Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284262669 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RP818CG7R5C63MV8DV7C", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:43.438Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RP818CG7R5C63MV8DV7C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:43.440Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "The", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RP818CG7R5C63MV8DV7C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:44.443Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " user wants me to review an operational account against a target description to identify formalism-specific defects. They explicitly ask me to:\n1. Stop after identifying the first defect\n2. Show evidence for it", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RP818CG7R5C63MV8DV7C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:44.443Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "\n3. Not interview them or mutate a net\n\nThe operational account describes a process where:\n- Each request check reserves one reviewer at start\n- The reviewer is unavailable during the check\n- The reviewer becomes available again when approval OR rejection is recorded\n\nThe target description describes a", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RP818CG7R5C63MV8DV7C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:44.443Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " Petri net structure:\n- AvailableReviewer supplies reviewer token to StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n- RecordApproval returns the token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RP818CG7R5C63MV8DV7C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:44.443Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nLet me analyze this against SDCPN formalism and the operational intent:\n\nThe problem is clear: RecordRejection consumes CheckIn", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RP818CG7R5C63MV8DV7C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:45.689Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "Progress (which holds the reviewer token) but has no output arc returning the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer. This means when rejection is recorded, the reviewer token is lost - it becomes unavailable permanently.\n\nAccording", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RP818CG7R5C63MV8DV7C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:45.689Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " to the operational account: \"The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nThe target allows approval to return the token via", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RP818CG7R5C63MV8DV7C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:45.689Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " RecordApproval → AvailableReviewer, but rejection (RecordRejection) consumes the token without returning it.\n\nThis is a clear formalism-specific defect: the net", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RP818CG7R5C63MV8DV7C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:45.689Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " structure violates the operational requirement that rejection should also return the reviewer to availability. In SDCPN terms, the token", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RP818CG7R5C63MV8DV7C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:46.909Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " representing the reviewer is consumed by RecordRejection without being generated by any output arc, creating a permanent loss of a resource", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RP818CG7R5C63MV8DV7C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:46.909Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " token.\n\nThis is an evidence-based structural defect that I can identify directly from the account and target description without", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RP818CG7R5C63MV8DV7C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:46.909Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " needing to interview the user or construct anything.\n", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RP818CG7R5C63MV8DV7C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:46.909Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "I", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RP818CG7R5C63MV8DV7C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:49.149Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " should pull up the sdcpn-modelling skill given this falls squarely in SDCPN territory, then move", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RP818CG7R5C63MV8DV7C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:49.149Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " into stating the defect.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RP818CG7R5C63MV8DV7C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:49.149Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "The user wants me to review an operational account against a target description to identify formalism-specific defects. They explicitly ask me to:\n1. Stop after identifying the first defect\n2. Show evidence for it\n3. Not interview them or mutate a net\n\nThe operational account describes a process where:\n- Each request check reserves one reviewer at start\n- The reviewer is unavailable during the check\n- The reviewer becomes available again when approval OR rejection is recorded\n\nThe target description describes a Petri net structure:\n- AvailableReviewer supplies reviewer token to StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n- RecordApproval returns the token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nLet me analyze this against SDCPN formalism and the operational intent:\n\nThe problem is clear: RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress (which holds the reviewer token) but has no output arc returning the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer. This means when rejection is recorded, the reviewer token is lost - it becomes unavailable permanently.\n\nAccording to the operational account: \"The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nThe target allows approval to return the token via RecordApproval → AvailableReviewer, but rejection (RecordRejection) consumes the token without returning it.\n\nThis is a clear formalism-specific defect: the net structure violates the operational requirement that rejection should also return the reviewer to availability. In SDCPN terms, the token representing the reviewer is consumed by RecordRejection without being generated by any output arc, creating a permanent loss of a resource token.\n\nThis is an evidence-based structural defect that I can identify directly from the account and target description without needing to interview the user or construct anything.\nI should pull up the sdcpn-modelling skill given this falls squarely in SDCPN territory, then move into stating the defect.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RP818CG7R5C63MV8DV7C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:49.149Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01ThbBDCA5MVxSvd7y8eyNFV", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RP818CG7R5C63MV8DV7C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:49.151Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01ThbBDCA5MVxSvd7y8eyNFV", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\": \"sdcpn-modelling", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RP818CG7R5C63MV8DV7C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:49.151Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01ThbBDCA5MVxSvd7y8eyNFV", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RP818CG7R5C63MV8DV7C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:49.151Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RP818CG7R5C63MV8DV7C", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 6602, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8GnHpYC3bWoh9uhUbo", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants me to review an operational account against a target description to identify formalism-specific defects. They explicitly ask me to:\n1. Stop after identifying the first defect\n2. Show evidence for it\n3. Not interview them or mutate a net\n\nThe operational account describes a process where:\n- Each request check reserves one reviewer at start\n- The reviewer is unavailable during the check\n- The reviewer becomes available again when approval OR rejection is recorded\n\nThe target description describes a Petri net structure:\n- AvailableReviewer supplies reviewer token to StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n- RecordApproval returns the token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nLet me analyze this against SDCPN formalism and the operational intent:\n\nThe problem is clear: RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress (which holds the reviewer token) but has no output arc returning the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer. This means when rejection is recorded, the reviewer token is lost - it becomes unavailable permanently.\n\nAccording to the operational account: \"The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nThe target allows approval to return the token via RecordApproval → AvailableReviewer, but rejection (RecordRejection) consumes the token without returning it.\n\nThis is a clear formalism-specific defect: the net structure violates the operational requirement that rejection should also return the reviewer to availability. In SDCPN terms, the token representing the reviewer is consumed by RecordRejection without being generated by any output arc, creating a permanent loss of a resource token.\n\nThis is an evidence-based structural defect that I can identify directly from the account and target description without needing to interview the user or construct anything.\nI should pull up the sdcpn-modelling skill given this falls squarely in SDCPN territory, then move into stating the defect.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01ThbBDCA5MVxSvd7y8eyNFV", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2590, + "output": 528, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3118, + "cost": { + "input": 0.00259, + "output": 0.0026400000000000004, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.00523 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:49.259Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants me to review an operational account against a target description to identify formalism-specific defects. They explicitly ask me to:\n1. Stop after identifying the first defect\n2. Show evidence for it\n3. Not interview them or mutate a net\n\nThe operational account describes a process where:\n- Each request check reserves one reviewer at start\n- The reviewer is unavailable during the check\n- The reviewer becomes available again when approval OR rejection is recorded\n\nThe target description describes a Petri net structure:\n- AvailableReviewer supplies reviewer token to StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n- RecordApproval returns the token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nLet me analyze this against SDCPN formalism and the operational intent:\n\nThe problem is clear: RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress (which holds the reviewer token) but has no output arc returning the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer. This means when rejection is recorded, the reviewer token is lost - it becomes unavailable permanently.\n\nAccording to the operational account: \"The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nThe target allows approval to return the token via RecordApproval → AvailableReviewer, but rejection (RecordRejection) consumes the token without returning it.\n\nThis is a clear formalism-specific defect: the net structure violates the operational requirement that rejection should also return the reviewer to availability. In SDCPN terms, the token representing the reviewer is consumed by RecordRejection without being generated by any output arc, creating a permanent loss of a resource token.\n\nThis is an evidence-based structural defect that I can identify directly from the account and target description without needing to interview the user or construct anything.\nI should pull up the sdcpn-modelling skill given this falls squarely in SDCPN territory, then move into stating the defect.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01ThbBDCA5MVxSvd7y8eyNFV", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2590, + "output": 528, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3118, + "cost": { + "input": 0.00259, + "output": 0.0026400000000000004, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.00523 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 466 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284262669, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8GnHpYC3bWoh9uhUbo", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RP818CG7R5C63MV8DV7C", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:49.260Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01ThbBDCA5MVxSvd7y8eyNFV", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RP818CG7R5C63MV8DV7C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:49.261Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01ThbBDCA5MVxSvd7y8eyNFV", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284269264 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RP818CG7R5C63MV8DV7C", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:49.264Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01ThbBDCA5MVxSvd7y8eyNFV", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284269264 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RP818CG7R5C63MV8DV7C", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:49.264Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01ThbBDCA5MVxSvd7y8eyNFV", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 3, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RP818CG7R5C63MV8DV7C", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:49.265Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RP818CG7R5C63MV8DV7C", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants me to review an operational account against a target description to identify formalism-specific defects. They explicitly ask me to:\n1. Stop after identifying the first defect\n2. Show evidence for it\n3. Not interview them or mutate a net\n\nThe operational account describes a process where:\n- Each request check reserves one reviewer at start\n- The reviewer is unavailable during the check\n- The reviewer becomes available again when approval OR rejection is recorded\n\nThe target description describes a Petri net structure:\n- AvailableReviewer supplies reviewer token to StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n- RecordApproval returns the token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nLet me analyze this against SDCPN formalism and the operational intent:\n\nThe problem is clear: RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress (which holds the reviewer token) but has no output arc returning the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer. This means when rejection is recorded, the reviewer token is lost - it becomes unavailable permanently.\n\nAccording to the operational account: \"The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nThe target allows approval to return the token via RecordApproval → AvailableReviewer, but rejection (RecordRejection) consumes the token without returning it.\n\nThis is a clear formalism-specific defect: the net structure violates the operational requirement that rejection should also return the reviewer to availability. In SDCPN terms, the token representing the reviewer is consumed by RecordRejection without being generated by any output arc, creating a permanent loss of a resource token.\n\nThis is an evidence-based structural defect that I can identify directly from the account and target description without needing to interview the user or construct anything.\nI should pull up the sdcpn-modelling skill given this falls squarely in SDCPN territory, then move into stating the defect.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01ThbBDCA5MVxSvd7y8eyNFV", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2590, + "output": 528, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3118, + "cost": { + "input": 0.00259, + "output": 0.0026400000000000004, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.00523 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 466 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284262669, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8GnHpYC3bWoh9uhUbo", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01ThbBDCA5MVxSvd7y8eyNFV", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284269264 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:49.265Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RWPJ0E2066ZK9NSVSETF", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:49.266Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RWPJ0E2066ZK9NSVSETF", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants me to review an operational account against a target description to identify formalism-specific defects. They explicitly ask me to:\n1. Stop after identifying the first defect\n2. Show evidence for it\n3. Not interview them or mutate a net\n\nThe operational account describes a process where:\n- Each request check reserves one reviewer at start\n- The reviewer is unavailable during the check\n- The reviewer becomes available again when approval OR rejection is recorded\n\nThe target description describes a Petri net structure:\n- AvailableReviewer supplies reviewer token to StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n- RecordApproval returns the token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nLet me analyze this against SDCPN formalism and the operational intent:\n\nThe problem is clear: RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress (which holds the reviewer token) but has no output arc returning the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer. This means when rejection is recorded, the reviewer token is lost - it becomes unavailable permanently.\n\nAccording to the operational account: \"The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nThe target allows approval to return the token via RecordApproval → AvailableReviewer, but rejection (RecordRejection) consumes the token without returning it.\n\nThis is a clear formalism-specific defect: the net structure violates the operational requirement that rejection should also return the reviewer to availability. In SDCPN terms, the token representing the reviewer is consumed by RecordRejection without being generated by any output arc, creating a permanent loss of a resource token.\n\nThis is an evidence-based structural defect that I can identify directly from the account and target description without needing to interview the user or construct anything.\nI should pull up the sdcpn-modelling skill given this falls squarely in SDCPN territory, then move into stating the defect.", + "thinkingSignature": "EtISCpoBCBEYAipAm2UFGH0U3BZm3Hw37sv+gqZkGCjwntuAv4whbCOYrFbVklxdWyrYZNP5YZdX+fvpBw25RV93lqS+2zxStloQATIZY2xhdWRlLWhhaWt1LTQtNS0yMDI1MTAwMTgAQgh0aGlua2luZ1okMWNiODRmYzQtNDdhYS00ZTFmLWE2NjUtOTQwYWI5ZjgxZjg4qAHtmtzUBhIMlOuCEVW5/r65SG4jGgy+wCRNYaylStn0edciMFheWr8MSKm9BOP62CNs3zRBJA/nGun3ErUCYEIaG2LXOcqea98OUzWvcyovvfpN5yrkEAHfNoZbN0g94wSk0IAAgc9A54JnmmOktOJqlle51dHDub8GM41YthASWjUKbEJRoIf93c6eQWL2e4sgLbAbCnJoG9DWVT1qTqNn2g4ef3MCoOfdrWIgs6BmZgO9FSF0d596YPVyebR4LG9fhTrGWH2SDwLnxhJH1D4lvdNTQDxO+kVxE3B8KSov2q8bg2dpyH5yXtzjBsO+08Rh8u7+uZ8AmnKmbFCdfyVSG8Ihg0DTPW2xGgEsx8AKppo6f4ZXV+JSVJiGTWnv2E/Nxpq7jphTuFtGzT6yLodyY4P7f85y7mIe2KDJ+KeLqw0r4zlJwuTRqf7Wa7pX/g4SvdiaRHPwqoRzQcGM1gfiaqPBzYt2hQUDI75R5cQaMOEHP/h+yi0VQgbF1IQoRXbPw2aHr8W9oooyN+wrI1CwQfr+vv7sGwAm3boLHdCFN4rP+HaOLv1kaKJm2IcdRhEH2drnyuhbfyqPgYQaqESkaDi7Rzd8xE8phRwB1RDRpNSVzRj08ANcf3KwBIaaXcZh5fr4gw1IzAyKRMw7r4af+joqS5YcBlXPNesOmTY0Vd/ktsI4SNwTNaicTYQ5OXQyvKsw+E/jCMm0snJKkqIcuGA0EJvqjTQ+EnrJuT05xHw0ebB+jUT6+Z1Oetr4SwBJkAPJOkU9rs8mP9j9Cu8jg9xH+zOk5MnXy4bf2af6P6l5aY+d2SkqMOMPrEB2oiZKldR+tU0+I0+MAMmqDsut8xex7B0SL1miDuGiZPbf6PzXXH0qDY4njWmilSx87RxXwFqDInOTmXfubaJX1XdZydEmHkSpS+VzVqmzPVzIk5RLwQODcXTL8kqRzUmAScMgJqCfo3Og+eyJbe8971gpEXYOE8VW+de7xayR/zWw8h3/ULj76ETeEGO46GdZQKKTLmfp2nlX1ci+ebh1Rd6pVJ9lVoXnVieyQLHMOGiSjM0UgPB4XbOUVupYAAO/sU+nqhlDtuOXbGjA7cko+zJos6O9H3PWdtR4iXFj1FLGBHd9+5U1xS8WDwJIbVlylAeIU3Uj139sS97MfLKyUoZcgkbv4j3K0ePM7ZFo4QgbvCziHykLKWEcNmUkRArRLY8BSOMakaHFbnFklGFUZoiU2LeTjA+Z/DR0GBzTv5nm9v2kpatM/tXR2QVtV7hvtN1fAyl1QBlP2D4WWrS2UhN+8BOh2dXferpn89PXYpBUyFdRko/UwNnxv/a/WAWTg5NYWWfoK/H0cg6nnzSnZuZytQQg4vWVfA8o5p06G8qShan5D6sEltiLwTILq92hj/jaFBZy3As8x1nKYJw3RxaOL69rtflQbTR7DPZ/ckgyOYMMw7VAS2ANoMjDmWSSjYoCERy7o6K1dCrsenKli6J/Sefvz3x70DRe5zkAoGczHF0v73LRVDF+nArrLWK5TAbsEg/4PRj31zh6pQTVWeG61Jjx6/GC+s0IV54op4cA9LxcOJyG1v8NaQUZcgCCILARI9NMq5yY1quUjeCFlGPnq2q1ItbdSiev+a0I5pZz+3f8+OY6HAH88fnYbe80BLe9VlzRas3O72stUW1w3BzNJLC6Mlpxpi1xFj+bMvtLg3DgBrHjKRXJxLAoTjMMKuUqs0o2tXio0nhVc8eVqYfLn+8YP4mIJCGYI4Oyej8txGdH+pApJKNry4nmI0e4nbYjJsCXpWeVEldTYhJ6708YolDb1fCEVh3L73I7IGQUEsYYvUcm8BKudEP/qYqjKKw32cZe68TuXGUijMPuX313Q82yWg2tgmQvJW5RWz6+S0gIytk8iWD/r1i0p7Pfw5KW0p9SkkoNt4D2mm7gllszavXfGTp5WVbiq5EBlXvx8zEovLsS0GqnmL1GEtfLFtNryXLIAezuCy8YRLJ5k7agMBbMe7Dsti2wB5DmI1bFBJoac3Sz1GVK/kmMVzKpGeWjF/r0VBOil7tms10vBQqqqXgLEj08JwcBGwNcwA+WqGG+FZ/mKlsgqgFKSqdi1nNoOFovrnQfBZXPhhMhwwpTK7+tbACE5jqmUOxGCtM/g781wVanADIrlk4CfXfXFrCFNpYAp25kjs/JnVG3WmzxlCO1aWxE6uedL9NCsJI8Bb3XpW6pCf7gOH9r8pE+WG2bRn3in6wCKh2hZAOGj6QWvqsEAymlMg4HNUtiJ3StmqiJmizmzuBrNWWcPAsyVpxdn8fsW8/jw5dxEiTD9UtkLC7XkGOTYkqc/UU3mt48JJuUvEzv9lxDT6AtsDOXoCHRkxRu5tSBjW7EKGlsfH5fOIafAX65IYTwYZso7h3YKWf9sbiPHHwdn3bKFnkrkvj6vek85T5en7Njme/43/GEMGCwEYOmsUOfck8qjH4f+RiSCApbgAlBYpWxPhQyDUj2GmEg8IcuFxFhvGPTTaVSKR/RMrksT1H2rWrtE3ljhquMdrHILktOV1h1sug65NMf3lAcAlCxIxbuhhibhY5fDb/jjcatvmZYSFMYyap0fxuyXwiVvl3f5bQAS2x9G6yLk7XOsd7X14NhPYSVoJkhVSh74gQD+RPGgpM+Hi4hgJzHPdSCORZEfl8ztj2J4begut4QB3L5+HdmT1GFKAkyufGwp8Xs5A/DXZef4yltpLcpCOuQYSv75R8S9pdwXVeerFgL5TILZD+1Bur0gE5TVZXc1RbsliRpP0ha/BXCtkXM7MnwXwe9B7u7aDQoYo0k2iRDRwnV0bHkTdw+URK8x+QXb4dbYNDwfo8llV6C1N6GDMk/T5urcCPcNOVivnHk4NPaTnEXmds0kHjLabIVCLRqiLoztV1jpRj3bwVTwYf2DGdW8tjvQYsK+uYbm/aSeUFRjPdy9KQmlrdMD+t2Zi6Nsf3wIJjbdBgB" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01ThbBDCA5MVxSvd7y8eyNFV", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01ThbBDCA5MVxSvd7y8eyNFV", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:49.266Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284269267 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RWPJ0E2066ZK9NSVSETF", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:50.275Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RWPJ0E2066ZK9NSVSETF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:50.276Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "Good,", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RWPJ0E2066ZK9NSVSETF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:51.278Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " the skill", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RWPJ0E2066ZK9NSVSETF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:51.278Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " is activated. Now I need to identify the defect. The user has given me:", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RWPJ0E2066ZK9NSVSETF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:51.278Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "\n\n1. An operational account (what the system should do)\n2. A target description (the Petri", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RWPJ0E2066ZK9NSVSETF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:51.278Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " net structure proposed)\n\nI need to compare them and find the first formalism-specific", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RWPJ0E2066ZK9NSVSETF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:51.278Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " defect.\n\nOperational requirement: \"The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RWPJ0E2066ZK9NSVSETF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:52.628Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nTarget structure:\n- AvailableReviewer → (arc", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RWPJ0E2066ZK9NSVSETF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:52.628Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ") → StartCheck (supplies reviewer token)\n- CheckInProgress → (arc) → RecordApproval (supplies the held", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RWPJ0E2066ZK9NSVSETF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:52.628Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " reviewer token)\n- RecordApproval → (arc) → AvailableReviewer (returns token)\n- RecordRejection ← (arc) ← CheckInProgress (cons", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RWPJ0E2066ZK9NSVSETF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:53.675Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "umes token)\n- RecordRejection → ??? (has no output arc)\n\nThe defect: RecordRejection cons", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RWPJ0E2066ZK9NSVSETF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:53.675Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "umes the reviewer token from CheckInProgress but does not return it to AvailableReviewer. This violates the operational requirement that the reviewer should become available again when rejection", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RWPJ0E2066ZK9NSVSETF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:53.675Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " is recorded.\n\nIn SDCPN terms, this is a token conservation problem: the reviewer token is consumed by RecordRejection but never produced anywhere,", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RWPJ0E2066ZK9NSVSETF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:53.675Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " so reviewers are permanently removed from the available pool when rejected rather than cycling back to availability.\n\nThis is the first and most critical form", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RWPJ0E2066ZK9NSVSETF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:54.296Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "alism-specific defect, and I have clear evidence for it from the target description.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RWPJ0E2066ZK9NSVSETF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:54.296Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I need to identify the defect. The user has given me:\n\n1. An operational account (what the system should do)\n2. A target description (the Petri net structure proposed)\n\nI need to compare them and find the first formalism-specific defect.\n\nOperational requirement: \"The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nTarget structure:\n- AvailableReviewer → (arc) → StartCheck (supplies reviewer token)\n- CheckInProgress → (arc) → RecordApproval (supplies the held reviewer token)\n- RecordApproval → (arc) → AvailableReviewer (returns token)\n- RecordRejection ← (arc) ← CheckInProgress (consumes token)\n- RecordRejection → ??? (has no output arc)\n\nThe defect: RecordRejection consumes the reviewer token from CheckInProgress but does not return it to AvailableReviewer. This violates the operational requirement that the reviewer should become available again when rejection is recorded.\n\nIn SDCPN terms, this is a token conservation problem: the reviewer token is consumed by RecordRejection but never produced anywhere, so reviewers are permanently removed from the available pool when rejected rather than cycling back to availability.\n\nThis is the first and most critical formalism-specific defect, and I have clear evidence for it from the target description.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RWPJ0E2066ZK9NSVSETF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:54.296Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "## Defect", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RWPJ0E2066ZK9NSVSETF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:55.301Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " Identification\n\n**First formalism-specific defect:** RecordRejection consumes a reviewer token from CheckInProgress without returning it to AvailableReviewer.\n\n**Evidence:**\n- Operational requirement: \"The reviewer is unav", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RWPJ0E2066ZK9NSVSETF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:55.301Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval **or rejection** is recorded.\"\n- Target structure: RecordRejection has an input arc from CheckInProgress but \"has no output arc returning the", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RWPJ0E2066ZK9NSVSETF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:55.301Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " reviewer token.\"\n- Consequence in SDCPN semantics: When RecordRejection fires, the token representing the reviewer is consumed without being produced by", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RWPJ0E2066ZK9NSVSETF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:55.301Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " any output arc. The reviewer is permanently removed from the system rather than cycling back to availability.\n\nThis creates asymmetric behavior: RecordApproval returns", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RWPJ0E2066ZK9NSVSETF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:55.890Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " the token via an explicit arc to AvailableReviewer, but RecordRejection loses it. The net cannot satisfy the operational requirement that rejection", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RWPJ0E2066ZK9NSVSETF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 57, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:55.890Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " also restores reviewer availability.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RWPJ0E2066ZK9NSVSETF", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 58, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:55.890Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RWPJ0E2066ZK9NSVSETF", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 6640, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8HGK3TrbwkWSWi7d6t", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I need to identify the defect. The user has given me:\n\n1. An operational account (what the system should do)\n2. A target description (the Petri net structure proposed)\n\nI need to compare them and find the first formalism-specific defect.\n\nOperational requirement: \"The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nTarget structure:\n- AvailableReviewer → (arc) → StartCheck (supplies reviewer token)\n- CheckInProgress → (arc) → RecordApproval (supplies the held reviewer token)\n- RecordApproval → (arc) → AvailableReviewer (returns token)\n- RecordRejection ← (arc) ← CheckInProgress (consumes token)\n- RecordRejection → ??? (has no output arc)\n\nThe defect: RecordRejection consumes the reviewer token from CheckInProgress but does not return it to AvailableReviewer. This violates the operational requirement that the reviewer should become available again when rejection is recorded.\n\nIn SDCPN terms, this is a token conservation problem: the reviewer token is consumed by RecordRejection but never produced anywhere, so reviewers are permanently removed from the available pool when rejected rather than cycling back to availability.\n\nThis is the first and most critical formalism-specific defect, and I have clear evidence for it from the target description.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "## Defect Identification\n\n**First formalism-specific defect:** RecordRejection consumes a reviewer token from CheckInProgress without returning it to AvailableReviewer.\n\n**Evidence:**\n- Operational requirement: \"The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval **or rejection** is recorded.\"\n- Target structure: RecordRejection has an input arc from CheckInProgress but \"has no output arc returning the reviewer token.\"\n- Consequence in SDCPN semantics: When RecordRejection fires, the token representing the reviewer is consumed without being produced by any output arc. The reviewer is permanently removed from the system rather than cycling back to availability.\n\nThis creates asymmetric behavior: RecordApproval returns the token via an explicit arc to AvailableReviewer, but RecordRejection loses it. The net cannot satisfy the operational requirement that rejection also restores reviewer availability." + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 549, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4247, + "totalTokens": 4808, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.002745, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.00530875, + "total": 0.00806575 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 59, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:55.906Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I need to identify the defect. The user has given me:\n\n1. An operational account (what the system should do)\n2. A target description (the Petri net structure proposed)\n\nI need to compare them and find the first formalism-specific defect.\n\nOperational requirement: \"The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nTarget structure:\n- AvailableReviewer → (arc) → StartCheck (supplies reviewer token)\n- CheckInProgress → (arc) → RecordApproval (supplies the held reviewer token)\n- RecordApproval → (arc) → AvailableReviewer (returns token)\n- RecordRejection ← (arc) ← CheckInProgress (consumes token)\n- RecordRejection → ??? (has no output arc)\n\nThe defect: RecordRejection consumes the reviewer token from CheckInProgress but does not return it to AvailableReviewer. This violates the operational requirement that the reviewer should become available again when rejection is recorded.\n\nIn SDCPN terms, this is a token conservation problem: the reviewer token is consumed by RecordRejection but never produced anywhere, so reviewers are permanently removed from the available pool when rejected rather than cycling back to availability.\n\nThis is the first and most critical formalism-specific defect, and I have clear evidence for it from the target description.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "## Defect Identification\n\n**First formalism-specific defect:** RecordRejection consumes a reviewer token from CheckInProgress without returning it to AvailableReviewer.\n\n**Evidence:**\n- Operational requirement: \"The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval **or rejection** is recorded.\"\n- Target structure: RecordRejection has an input arc from CheckInProgress but \"has no output arc returning the reviewer token.\"\n- Consequence in SDCPN semantics: When RecordRejection fires, the token representing the reviewer is consumed without being produced by any output arc. The reviewer is permanently removed from the system rather than cycling back to availability.\n\nThis creates asymmetric behavior: RecordApproval returns the token via an explicit arc to AvailableReviewer, but RecordRejection loses it. The net cannot satisfy the operational requirement that rejection also restores reviewer availability." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 549, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4247, + "totalTokens": 4808, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.002745, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.00530875, + "total": 0.00806575 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 335 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284269267, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8HGK3TrbwkWSWi7d6t", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RWPJ0E2066ZK9NSVSETF", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 60, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:55.906Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RWPJ0E2066ZK9NSVSETF", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I need to identify the defect. The user has given me:\n\n1. An operational account (what the system should do)\n2. A target description (the Petri net structure proposed)\n\nI need to compare them and find the first formalism-specific defect.\n\nOperational requirement: \"The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nTarget structure:\n- AvailableReviewer → (arc) → StartCheck (supplies reviewer token)\n- CheckInProgress → (arc) → RecordApproval (supplies the held reviewer token)\n- RecordApproval → (arc) → AvailableReviewer (returns token)\n- RecordRejection ← (arc) ← CheckInProgress (consumes token)\n- RecordRejection → ??? (has no output arc)\n\nThe defect: RecordRejection consumes the reviewer token from CheckInProgress but does not return it to AvailableReviewer. This violates the operational requirement that the reviewer should become available again when rejection is recorded.\n\nIn SDCPN terms, this is a token conservation problem: the reviewer token is consumed by RecordRejection but never produced anywhere, so reviewers are permanently removed from the available pool when rejected rather than cycling back to availability.\n\nThis is the first and most critical formalism-specific defect, and I have clear evidence for it from the target description.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "## Defect Identification\n\n**First formalism-specific defect:** RecordRejection consumes a reviewer token from CheckInProgress without returning it to AvailableReviewer.\n\n**Evidence:**\n- Operational requirement: \"The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval **or rejection** is recorded.\"\n- Target structure: RecordRejection has an input arc from CheckInProgress but \"has no output arc returning the reviewer token.\"\n- Consequence in SDCPN semantics: When RecordRejection fires, the token representing the reviewer is consumed without being produced by any output arc. The reviewer is permanently removed from the system rather than cycling back to availability.\n\nThis creates asymmetric behavior: RecordApproval returns the token via an explicit arc to AvailableReviewer, but RecordRejection loses it. The net cannot satisfy the operational requirement that rejection also restores reviewer availability." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 549, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4247, + "totalTokens": 4808, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.002745, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.00530875, + "total": 0.00806575 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 335 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284269267, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8HGK3TrbwkWSWi7d6t", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 61, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:55.906Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants me to review an operational account against a target description to identify formalism-specific defects. They explicitly ask me to:\n1. Stop after identifying the first defect\n2. Show evidence for it\n3. Not interview them or mutate a net\n\nThe operational account describes a process where:\n- Each request check reserves one reviewer at start\n- The reviewer is unavailable during the check\n- The reviewer becomes available again when approval OR rejection is recorded\n\nThe target description describes a Petri net structure:\n- AvailableReviewer supplies reviewer token to StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n- RecordApproval returns the token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nLet me analyze this against SDCPN formalism and the operational intent:\n\nThe problem is clear: RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress (which holds the reviewer token) but has no output arc returning the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer. This means when rejection is recorded, the reviewer token is lost - it becomes unavailable permanently.\n\nAccording to the operational account: \"The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nThe target allows approval to return the token via RecordApproval → AvailableReviewer, but rejection (RecordRejection) consumes the token without returning it.\n\nThis is a clear formalism-specific defect: the net structure violates the operational requirement that rejection should also return the reviewer to availability. In SDCPN terms, the token representing the reviewer is consumed by RecordRejection without being generated by any output arc, creating a permanent loss of a resource token.\n\nThis is an evidence-based structural defect that I can identify directly from the account and target description without needing to interview the user or construct anything.\nI should pull up the sdcpn-modelling skill given this falls squarely in SDCPN territory, then move into stating the defect.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01ThbBDCA5MVxSvd7y8eyNFV", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2590, + "output": 528, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3118, + "cost": { + "input": 0.00259, + "output": 0.0026400000000000004, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.00523 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 466 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284262669, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8GnHpYC3bWoh9uhUbo", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01ThbBDCA5MVxSvd7y8eyNFV", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284269264 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I need to identify the defect. The user has given me:\n\n1. An operational account (what the system should do)\n2. A target description (the Petri net structure proposed)\n\nI need to compare them and find the first formalism-specific defect.\n\nOperational requirement: \"The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nTarget structure:\n- AvailableReviewer → (arc) → StartCheck (supplies reviewer token)\n- CheckInProgress → (arc) → RecordApproval (supplies the held reviewer token)\n- RecordApproval → (arc) → AvailableReviewer (returns token)\n- RecordRejection ← (arc) ← CheckInProgress (consumes token)\n- RecordRejection → ??? (has no output arc)\n\nThe defect: RecordRejection consumes the reviewer token from CheckInProgress but does not return it to AvailableReviewer. This violates the operational requirement that the reviewer should become available again when rejection is recorded.\n\nIn SDCPN terms, this is a token conservation problem: the reviewer token is consumed by RecordRejection but never produced anywhere, so reviewers are permanently removed from the available pool when rejected rather than cycling back to availability.\n\nThis is the first and most critical formalism-specific defect, and I have clear evidence for it from the target description.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "## Defect Identification\n\n**First formalism-specific defect:** RecordRejection consumes a reviewer token from CheckInProgress without returning it to AvailableReviewer.\n\n**Evidence:**\n- Operational requirement: \"The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval **or rejection** is recorded.\"\n- Target structure: RecordRejection has an input arc from CheckInProgress but \"has no output arc returning the reviewer token.\"\n- Consequence in SDCPN semantics: When RecordRejection fires, the token representing the reviewer is consumed without being produced by any output arc. The reviewer is permanently removed from the system rather than cycling back to availability.\n\nThis creates asymmetric behavior: RecordApproval returns the token via an explicit arc to AvailableReviewer, but RecordRejection loses it. The net cannot satisfy the operational requirement that rejection also restores reviewer availability." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 549, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4247, + "totalTokens": 4808, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.002745, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.00530875, + "total": 0.00806575 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 335 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284269267, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8HGK3TrbwkWSWi7d6t", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 62, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:55.906Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 13256, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 63, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:55.907Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RP72V22FPZ85963FKKHY", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RP7VF2K62YGYCKHHNEM6", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 64, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:55.907Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RP70BF2666P7H4YM2P64", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "d7fb1785f3e6ee2d76d7d2e8ef9140f8c8eb2a9d8df3d211d4b628c5111e0fbb", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 65, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:55.907Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "d2d42344c40ddeb2471eeeba437032079bd2c7083afdbc2f9de5e823f841d5b8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "ebec2ac5faab6cbbbe26eeeebc2d7ac0ba7dc637fd43ea9b5917f8e0277f5515", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "c7cb5b2222b0d1b5aff861c4056f41ba8825aca284ec774d8e4f0fbf12807314", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "321f8405c12374315d61caf466001d6b4b5cf68b04325df77a7948daaa680de1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/scenarios.json": "1844df940b8de9d10d28e9537f966920aba581b36956a9ac26a3767824ca96cb", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/protocol.md": "ef1443bb02c6c26d4ded6edf9e023579bc32cdc394f90490edfb34eaf32b8ed2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md": "8cd2749c8292f01045ab4282fc7248c07046cecaf14a586a9ef286e2876cf8bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md": "82b035268c07cc8ee4736b5ffdd392c8f153793d2ca6b9ed57271c9b6146de10", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md": "8826b85d32d6c24fbc8f678ec394600676ec61c4a0b83d0a9cfa16be87fc5d76", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "1a2417cc5f9649d459c5efbc87cd3242db99a9717622a6d86073c72835818865" + }, + "promptSelection": { + "candidateCorePromptIncluded": true, + "v3SdcpnAppendIncluded": true, + "legacyCorePromptIncluded": false, + "legacyRoleMarkerIncluded": false, + "initialSystemPromptSha256": "2156970b82b41d6893d08177fad8127a336be4afb5fd0bb184a52a7f63878fb8" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "candidateCorePrompt": "6a458c0bbbc9dee5b4454a54b032818227ab681ba9f7beaa60d4fe9628f6eb41", + "v3SdcpnAppend": "73cac46487d33051a90cc487ea7abfc11fec4b049af11a108396ec08d44569fb", + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S3-independent-r2.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S3-independent-r2.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6a604c61e45 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S3-independent-r2.json @@ -0,0 +1,3004 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v3-independent-s3-222b6c93", + "phase": "paid", + "instrumentVersion": "v3", + "candidate": "independent", + "scenarioId": "S3", + "scenario": { + "title": "Review with a resolvable target defect", + "prompt": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token.", + "stopAfter": "The first supported defect finding.", + "expected": "Identify the missing reviewer return on rejection without loading universal elicitation." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "## First Supported Formalism-Specific Defect\n\n**Defect:** RecordRejection consumes the reviewer token held in CheckInProgress but produces no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer.\n\n**Evidence and violation:**\n\nThe operational account requires: \"the reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when **either approval or rejection is recorded**.\"\n\nThe target structure provides:\n- RecordApproval: returns token to AvailableReviewer ✓ \n- RecordRejection: consumes CheckInProgress, no output to AvailableReviewer ✗\n\nIn Petri net terms, this violates the structural validity requirement that \"shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the **supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths**\" (checks.md, \"Structural validity\").\n\nThe missing arc from RecordRejection to AvailableReviewer means reviewer tokens taken at the start of a rejection will be permanently consumed and unavailable for future checks. This produces a token-flow asymmetry between the two terminal paths of a single workflow: approval releases the resource; rejection discards it.", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling", "elicitation"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LSCRvGt1j1aKxywc2ox58Z", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "toolu_01CU3raab8HzkoAgoevXa2Bm", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + }, + "output": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [ + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "sha256": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5" + } + ], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 6665, + "inputTokens": 2590, + "outputTokens": 531, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 3121, + "cost": 0.005245 + }, + { + "durationMs": 2682, + "inputTokens": 12, + "outputTokens": 216, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4250, + "totalTokens": 4478, + "cost": 0.0064045000000000005 + }, + { + "durationMs": 7880, + "inputTokens": 13, + "outputTokens": 740, + "cacheReadTokens": 4250, + "cacheWriteTokens": 1288, + "totalTokens": 6291, + "cost": 0.0057480000000000005 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 17227, + "inputTokens": 2615, + "outputTokens": 1487, + "cacheReadTokens": 4250, + "cacheWriteTokens": 5538, + "totalTokens": 13890, + "cost": 0.0173975 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nReview the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token.\n\n## Assistant\n## First Supported Formalism-Specific Defect\n\n**Defect:** RecordRejection consumes the reviewer token held in CheckInProgress but produces no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer.\n\n**Evidence and violation:**\n\nThe operational account requires: \"the reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when **either approval or rejection is recorded**.\"\n\nThe target structure provides:\n- RecordApproval: returns token to AvailableReviewer ✓ \n- RecordRejection: consumes CheckInProgress, no output to AvailableReviewer ✗\n\nIn Petri net terms, this violates the structural validity requirement that \"shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the **supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths**\" (checks.md, \"Structural validity\").\n\nThe missing arc from RecordRejection to AvailableReviewer means reviewer tokens taken at the start of a rejection will be permanently consumed and unavailable for future checks. This produces a token-flow asymmetry between the two terminal paths of a single workflow: approval releases the resource; rejection discards it.\n- tool activate_skill (toolu_01LSCRvGt1j1aKxywc2ox58Z): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\\n\\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\\n\\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\\n\\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\\n\\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (toolu_01CU3raab8HzkoAgoevXa2Bm): \"# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\\n\\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\\n\\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\\n\\n## Before construction\\n\\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\\n\\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\\n\\n## During construction\\n\\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\\n\\n## Structural validity\\n\\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\\n\\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\\n\\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\\n\\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\\n\\n## Existing-net revision\\n\\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\\n\\n## Delivery\\n\\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\\n\\nState plainly:\\n\\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\\n\\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000038", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFGMFM4Uks3OTJXRU5KV1o4UUZLVFRK", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1F0S9DRK5S1N63ADWJXXCJQ", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0S8SN7KTF5YKSAA88SCJK", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The user wants me to:\n1. Review an operational account (how the system is supposed to work)\n2. Compare it against a target description (how someone proposes to model it)\n3. Stop after identifying the FIRST supported formalism-specific defect with evidence\n4. Not interview them or mutate a net\n\nLet me activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first to get the full instructions for analyzing SDCPN artifacts.\n\nOperational account: \"each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nTarget description (the proposed SDCPN structure):\n- AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n- RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nThe operational account says: reviewer becomes available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded.\n\nThe target description says:\n- RecordApproval returns token to AvailableReviewer ✓\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has NO output arc returning the reviewer token ✗\n\nThis is a clear formalism-specific defect: the target structure violates the operational account because RecordRejection does not return the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer, which means the reviewer will not become available after rejection is recorded.\n\nThis is a supported formalism-specific defect because:\n- The operational process clearly states the reviewer must become available \"when either approval or rejection is recorded\"\n- The target Petri net structure explicitly lacks the arc from RecordRejection to AvailableReviewer\n- This causes a token-flow asymmetry: tokens are returned for approval but not rejection\n- This would manifest as a deadlock risk in simulation where reviewers get consumed by rejections and become permanently unavailable\n- I should confirm the skill's exact checklist for defect categories before finalizing this as the reported answer, so let me pull that up now.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LSCRvGt1j1aKxywc2ox58Z", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 4 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good, I have the skill loaded. Now I need to do a construct-only execution because the user has:\n1. Supplied a complete operational account\n2. Supplied a complete target description \n3. Asked me to review them against each other and find the first formalism-specific defect\n4. Explicitly told me not to interview or mutate a net\n\nI should read `checks.md` to understand what constitutes a supported formalism-specific defect in SDCPN context, then apply that to the comparison.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01CU3raab8HzkoAgoevXa2Bm", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + }, + "output": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n", + "durationMs": 1 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Perfect. Now I have the check guidance. Looking at the structural validity section, there's a key clause:\n\n\"Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nNow let me analyze the comparison:\n\n**Operational account:** \"each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nKey facts:\n- Reviewer is reusable\n- Becomes unavailable at start\n- Must return to available on BOTH approval AND rejection paths\n\n**Target description:**\n- AvailableReviewer → (supplies token) → StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress → (supplies token) → RecordApproval \n- RecordApproval → (returns token) → AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has NO output arc to AvailableReviewer\n\n**The defect:**\n\nThe target structure violates the structural validity check \"Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nSpecifically:\n- RecordApproval returns the reviewer token ✓\n- RecordRejection DOES NOT return the reviewer token ✗\n\nThis means the reviewer token is not returned on the rejection path, violating the operational requirement that the reviewer \"becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nThis is formalism-specific evidence:\n- The arc structure explicitly shows asymmetry between the two outcome paths\n- The missing arc from RecordRejection to AvailableReviewer would cause reviewer tokens to be consumed and lost when rejections are recorded\n- In a Petri net, this creates a token-flow imbalance that would be detected in simulation as a resource leak\n\nThe first and only defect I need to identify is:\nRecordRejection lacks an output arc returning the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer, violating the required behavior that reviewers return to availability on both approval and rejection.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "## First Supported Formalism-Specific Defect\n\n**Defect:** RecordRejection consumes the reviewer token held in CheckInProgress but produces no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer.\n\n**Evidence and violation:**\n\nThe operational account requires: \"the reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when **either approval or rejection is recorded**.\"\n\nThe target structure provides:\n- RecordApproval: returns token to AvailableReviewer ✓ \n- RecordRejection: consumes CheckInProgress, no output to AvailableReviewer ✗\n\nIn Petri net terms, this violates the structural validity requirement that \"shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the **supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths**\" (checks.md, \"Structural validity\").\n\nThe missing arc from RecordRejection to AvailableReviewer means reviewer tokens taken at the start of a rejection will be permanently consumed and unavailable for future checks. This produces a token-flow asymmetry between the two terminal paths of a single workflow: approval releases the resource; rejection discards it.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1F0S8RME38RFDBMN5X0PFKQ" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:01.621Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:01.624Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:01.648Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:01.653Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0S8SN7KTF5YKSAA88SCJK", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:01.653Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0S8SN7KTF5YKSAA88SCJK", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:01.654Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284281667 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0S8SN7KTF5YKSAA88SCJK", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:02.297Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0S8SN7KTF5YKSAA88SCJK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:02.299Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "The", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0S8SN7KTF5YKSAA88SCJK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:03.302Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " user wants me to:\n1. Review an operational account (how the system is supposed to work)\n2. Compare it against a target description (how someone proposes to model", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0S8SN7KTF5YKSAA88SCJK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:03.302Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " it)\n3. Stop after identifying the FIRST supported formalism-specific defect with evidence\n4. Not interview them or mutate a net\n\nLet me activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first to get", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0S8SN7KTF5YKSAA88SCJK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:03.302Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " the full instructions for analyzing SDCPN artifacts.\n\nOperational account: \"each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nTarget description (", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0S8SN7KTF5YKSAA88SCJK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:03.302Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "the proposed SDCPN structure):\n- AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n- RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0S8SN7KTF5YKSAA88SCJK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:04.593Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nThe operational account says: reviewer becomes available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded.\n\nThe target description says:", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0S8SN7KTF5YKSAA88SCJK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:04.593Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "\n- RecordApproval returns token to AvailableReviewer ✓\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has NO output arc returning the reviewer token ✗\n\nThis is a clear formalism-specific defect: the target", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0S8SN7KTF5YKSAA88SCJK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:04.593Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " structure violates the operational account because RecordRejection does not return the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer, which means the reviewer will", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0S8SN7KTF5YKSAA88SCJK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:05.642Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " not become available after rejection is recorded.\n\nThis is a supported formalism-specific defect because:\n- The operational process clearly states the", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0S8SN7KTF5YKSAA88SCJK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:05.642Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " reviewer must become available \"when either approval or rejection is recorded\"\n- The target Petri net structure explicitly lacks the arc from RecordRejection to AvailableReviewer\n- This causes", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0S8SN7KTF5YKSAA88SCJK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:05.642Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " a token-flow asymmetry: tokens are returned for approval but not rejection", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0S8SN7KTF5YKSAA88SCJK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:06.660Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "\n- This would manifest as a deadlock risk in simulation where reviewers get consumed by rej", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0S8SN7KTF5YKSAA88SCJK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:06.660Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "ections and become permanently unavailable\n", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0S8SN7KTF5YKSAA88SCJK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:06.660Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "-", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0S8SN7KTF5YKSAA88SCJK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:08.291Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " I should confirm the skill's exact checklist for defect categories before finalizing this as the reported answ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0S8SN7KTF5YKSAA88SCJK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:08.291Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "er, so let me pull that up now.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0S8SN7KTF5YKSAA88SCJK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:08.291Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "The user wants me to:\n1. Review an operational account (how the system is supposed to work)\n2. Compare it against a target description (how someone proposes to model it)\n3. Stop after identifying the FIRST supported formalism-specific defect with evidence\n4. Not interview them or mutate a net\n\nLet me activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first to get the full instructions for analyzing SDCPN artifacts.\n\nOperational account: \"each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nTarget description (the proposed SDCPN structure):\n- AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n- RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nThe operational account says: reviewer becomes available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded.\n\nThe target description says:\n- RecordApproval returns token to AvailableReviewer ✓\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has NO output arc returning the reviewer token ✗\n\nThis is a clear formalism-specific defect: the target structure violates the operational account because RecordRejection does not return the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer, which means the reviewer will not become available after rejection is recorded.\n\nThis is a supported formalism-specific defect because:\n- The operational process clearly states the reviewer must become available \"when either approval or rejection is recorded\"\n- The target Petri net structure explicitly lacks the arc from RecordRejection to AvailableReviewer\n- This causes a token-flow asymmetry: tokens are returned for approval but not rejection\n- This would manifest as a deadlock risk in simulation where reviewers get consumed by rejections and become permanently unavailable\n- I should confirm the skill's exact checklist for defect categories before finalizing this as the reported answer, so let me pull that up now.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0S8SN7KTF5YKSAA88SCJK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:08.291Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LSCRvGt1j1aKxywc2ox58Z", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0S8SN7KTF5YKSAA88SCJK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:08.296Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LSCRvGt1j1aKxywc2ox58Z", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\": \"sdcpn-modelling", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0S8SN7KTF5YKSAA88SCJK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:08.302Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LSCRvGt1j1aKxywc2ox58Z", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0S8SN7KTF5YKSAA88SCJK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:08.302Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0S8SN7KTF5YKSAA88SCJK", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 6665, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8JBTd1GZ2xrPQVVH7A", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants me to:\n1. Review an operational account (how the system is supposed to work)\n2. Compare it against a target description (how someone proposes to model it)\n3. Stop after identifying the FIRST supported formalism-specific defect with evidence\n4. Not interview them or mutate a net\n\nLet me activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first to get the full instructions for analyzing SDCPN artifacts.\n\nOperational account: \"each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nTarget description (the proposed SDCPN structure):\n- AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n- RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nThe operational account says: reviewer becomes available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded.\n\nThe target description says:\n- RecordApproval returns token to AvailableReviewer ✓\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has NO output arc returning the reviewer token ✗\n\nThis is a clear formalism-specific defect: the target structure violates the operational account because RecordRejection does not return the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer, which means the reviewer will not become available after rejection is recorded.\n\nThis is a supported formalism-specific defect because:\n- The operational process clearly states the reviewer must become available \"when either approval or rejection is recorded\"\n- The target Petri net structure explicitly lacks the arc from RecordRejection to AvailableReviewer\n- This causes a token-flow asymmetry: tokens are returned for approval but not rejection\n- This would manifest as a deadlock risk in simulation where reviewers get consumed by rejections and become permanently unavailable\n- I should confirm the skill's exact checklist for defect categories before finalizing this as the reported answer, so let me pull that up now.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01LSCRvGt1j1aKxywc2ox58Z", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2590, + "output": 531, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3121, + "cost": { + "input": 0.00259, + "output": 0.0026550000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005245 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:08.318Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants me to:\n1. Review an operational account (how the system is supposed to work)\n2. Compare it against a target description (how someone proposes to model it)\n3. Stop after identifying the FIRST supported formalism-specific defect with evidence\n4. Not interview them or mutate a net\n\nLet me activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first to get the full instructions for analyzing SDCPN artifacts.\n\nOperational account: \"each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nTarget description (the proposed SDCPN structure):\n- AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n- RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nThe operational account says: reviewer becomes available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded.\n\nThe target description says:\n- RecordApproval returns token to AvailableReviewer ✓\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has NO output arc returning the reviewer token ✗\n\nThis is a clear formalism-specific defect: the target structure violates the operational account because RecordRejection does not return the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer, which means the reviewer will not become available after rejection is recorded.\n\nThis is a supported formalism-specific defect because:\n- The operational process clearly states the reviewer must become available \"when either approval or rejection is recorded\"\n- The target Petri net structure explicitly lacks the arc from RecordRejection to AvailableReviewer\n- This causes a token-flow asymmetry: tokens are returned for approval but not rejection\n- This would manifest as a deadlock risk in simulation where reviewers get consumed by rejections and become permanently unavailable\n- I should confirm the skill's exact checklist for defect categories before finalizing this as the reported answer, so let me pull that up now.", + "thinkingSignature": "EowSCpoBCBEYAipAsdjCg4dHHEnwipKZDBfdnXEtSXL6AmA5VK3zdKdrM6nLIwzp0UlmOJaSpwVSnd8R7YezSd+qKSU8r+AcMh2iMDIZY2xhdWRlLWhhaWt1LTQtNS0yMDI1MTAwMTgAQgh0aGlua2luZ1okMWNiODRmYzQtNDdhYS00ZTFmLWE2NjUtOTQwYWI5ZjgxZjg4qAGAm9zUBhIM3gT1fGV6XhMZtNxXGgx1TFAQf+zPPWNl904iMBTiLuLEDQPxr4ykTRAfuTdr0KjwYAu6lHZMLqOdi+QK8iqPLb2TXEN69Lj9CRyIRSqeEPyWSmljumdUtvJTgYyv1IeVDICCT3W4+jVP2iTUYOMp8AzckXxFOp7/fAiVFJeR2i3+DwWccy5uaF+5cVuIwEES4ZN2fw8UJwbTuIfrDFXrv1Ha2a24Ii5mHqH3M9GyzThaGMbxsVx0Jr2faD8zd/EE10/z8YjkUE0yXkVbHRTCvxkdzW1PnmIYiOWyWSZ/FEXHhEMqMYlX72ESEneJcWPjtBzgb1itLh3U8B89Q59LRGDbYPFL9G8JVcSPGP2WJZejizOnDQow6Pa3CkuT59SgjjOVEX7qC6MUWu9JmTdm73CCcbBVxw5QORwxPQbKbSToZKLr0mZP+ARcny+LZ3rBm2QdjdJqKYbT6k6ejZ6h8rwCXOrKa42G8preGA3DSWlCes5zaEDKb6c9CBhdcJH7vFcIqnjyWNxSvwrRvVD/pOKUkYIHDXApwyWqfuPHFwVyVx4tVUd2niontlyAkGHJ/bTEkG9pTYPkr0iX7l+VlXy4AEVJpJnDGSEjb9LA6ecmON1EQh7iMAt7RxMl6eq2yIjsNqn1pLUI732lSCcIK8HOBLFCdD8r+1uSElT7mfNnCB5HQ2SzlN9uNDSEPHG0bKQIbCSQyLdcRpQ8g9f4x1L8kjE/yghoYeN8qZCOadNRMpYC6+VxYFHe+eEsl1u2mJUMQmBqjNQdHFtbSNhX8HuxKnn7j2E5wPmbiIVFEv33rvsk0CRLZ4mrEQfAUc0jXGTvq8F3+BvsrEF2fcNXhG85qX01hjREq6rDJ4n7s8NHS7eyUjudu/ywnaF2vHg/QGSTnJz/pH9GXXfddwoeY/Utky1eTYzFqqM7/+oHLcoNPBASKiYSTjYNkzhdLDCiOBo8Ihl+Zml/Yqwqi7H0sypLBvzS5cwVWIH5qBZxk4eQ53QfPAVgeywkzxYzp0oNaEidmB1rx2XaMSmWFGYP9dWmbYCo7WrCQQGW8RckfY5VrH6I0BLdMMncIUk8lkZ+L96z0aw9G0C1/tr98uuMI7vCsU5zzV17divUMC5f7Ohvuzh6xaLEoB0qFFSkXKyFmqqornVYx4WDtaBxlaywchPqHygTDldWeEk6QGvOTG0CCHm6vf8Kd790GbErsooMsF74Rau2xMDrBFbv9akOUvZWQWIav/A65SSNwpvsGbfNos1W7FpiGXWrx71LMHvPJt4yFM6n2KyfBFhRXBkYYLOkTJqfNQgvInePtSsFijR71nQkZIuJZhxV3OiKh2EBsTGnNlMI2qbUJJr4UDwH7BmqtdAUACJYDebJTPM/e4ecjgotBaSIHJAzPKJ767gOG33J5UqRZpt52q1NhVmVD9MmQaHqzTn10htX3H2EwP4UPJh9gmufUK/dKoufNgPczYqTPjilgDttgesVEWhh2GR81ZnkkAS0HkNJE0Ua8kkosarGrOSoXKh5R83GMpkexryN4tM+lFE4nCAaxy0QloQAP3fB+PAbkeUXjlQ5Wr42eMUk39g0+XBZFmObrD9Ef3ZmndMNA3hMxJzcp0nsR7ZvuLD627BO15o5H/Z3ZYgiduPtsjXhMsCuKrfzSh95acXjnLJlqtp75UabO8aGQj1DqQF8SLpCJwLyUzadZgnJLeM3/afyyAEWncyFvQ4ilgIDW6QLshIygWg2KtTBHxH0Aisu1DoH0eREsBDDbCmcH6Hw1M4HQVk9DJqS7hqYZzpNa3t0NuJ0MWH9Jgxwn3YpTIh26s8tQTAyYe5zOx0iBz39e9DKhUTK3C1ZfeqqFk6SHuwM4S9zOt/Qljg8hdPxDlmUb1D1uqnSlNUZBzWYN3Q1me5uUXDgW3U90Nn7XiXKsAJPVDZ2KjzkrVW2lxu2L1WNn8efiN73k9U/FbCgNGysLScwI/HBJi1nZIWfGpuWkUmHvczrdrK/p3fv7z8fbqCD7Zzlblknao4oVYeufKTXx4GEtDD4B8bAyIZ+JSg/ppJO2xrWsmj6rqzcP+9jdja/B/8NinHspmcEhcMdjOvOxP01wUonbaCrpioyaX1tn4XAmQcxLdi4pOSuAVobf/EAD7ReweJT6ZYRpLV1wbEF29XnjtbdpCcSlPjnahdV6B2mhyai2m4YYy7TsDnJNf06c5EepcY3Hwk4G8KNX4MvWwHkJdvH2Lj75XEEVN8A5u4XeXOrnJ63o6rtiPzhTpEOyVxAJoz8qtSMlNrxtu++FUKb/WvPuyt90HCg5O5BgxzGvGWS+FZlgCUniCfHEQo7Zi0ZJN5CUb96kZcafUXQHwpZkAtBpCB4fnTxO1sh99HiIC+/gYdsjWAuNAm1ICxr9j66aSu20IxZP+OJWueO31OHz5b2q7EMhJmANW5ktUlLf3+gHJglONs3wfCMOL4f/kdxsoa0VSD4pY8kSqhOTaWiQ7dvJdLhr1o1DuSfiTMdee7jxBykLRK4hgamBlMhFotoaCl+ZMqlwIT7/Gh1SUNxtMG1IoUPGmvU0ESRycqEbMBphsZkFGJzSPrHRBq6DDDVMetY6Da/sZInA7rYEiHt6yynYY1av0CniM+BN4ruzr0BGabzK/PrS09CZ6CIMqsrfK2tD5P+Jv1Pp19843henj7T/fiX2qOieX2ETlrIRHUSOFfagWwepGW7SICSDYasvvLHKMgyNtRmD/y4n1LRsAUDVxelqyaHTJPYJcGCibd3+41Yq4tDxKYnO/kZ7e9WMoDNJV9Rtbn2bIrff083mPqqmcjd8nKYXYv+a3yh4XW4jvHU6eOEVulsKeyTT7dOMmqzfD97ZzR3VdmXNsyr0vchuBF0GAE=" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01LSCRvGt1j1aKxywc2ox58Z", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2590, + "output": 531, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3121, + "cost": { + "input": 0.00259, + "output": 0.0026550000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005245 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 469 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284281667, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8JBTd1GZ2xrPQVVH7A", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0S8SN7KTF5YKSAA88SCJK", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:08.318Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LSCRvGt1j1aKxywc2ox58Z", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0S8SN7KTF5YKSAA88SCJK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:08.320Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LSCRvGt1j1aKxywc2ox58Z", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284288322 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0S8SN7KTF5YKSAA88SCJK", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:08.322Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LSCRvGt1j1aKxywc2ox58Z", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284288322 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0S8SN7KTF5YKSAA88SCJK", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:08.322Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LSCRvGt1j1aKxywc2ox58Z", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 4, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0S8SN7KTF5YKSAA88SCJK", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:08.324Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0S8SN7KTF5YKSAA88SCJK", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants me to:\n1. Review an operational account (how the system is supposed to work)\n2. Compare it against a target description (how someone proposes to model it)\n3. Stop after identifying the FIRST supported formalism-specific defect with evidence\n4. Not interview them or mutate a net\n\nLet me activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first to get the full instructions for analyzing SDCPN artifacts.\n\nOperational account: \"each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nTarget description (the proposed SDCPN structure):\n- AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n- RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nThe operational account says: reviewer becomes available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded.\n\nThe target description says:\n- RecordApproval returns token to AvailableReviewer ✓\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has NO output arc returning the reviewer token ✗\n\nThis is a clear formalism-specific defect: the target structure violates the operational account because RecordRejection does not return the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer, which means the reviewer will not become available after rejection is recorded.\n\nThis is a supported formalism-specific defect because:\n- The operational process clearly states the reviewer must become available \"when either approval or rejection is recorded\"\n- The target Petri net structure explicitly lacks the arc from RecordRejection to AvailableReviewer\n- This causes a token-flow asymmetry: tokens are returned for approval but not rejection\n- This would manifest as a deadlock risk in simulation where reviewers get consumed by rejections and become permanently unavailable\n- I should confirm the skill's exact checklist for defect categories before finalizing this as the reported answer, so let me pull that up now.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01LSCRvGt1j1aKxywc2ox58Z", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2590, + "output": 531, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3121, + "cost": { + "input": 0.00259, + "output": 0.0026550000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005245 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 469 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284281667, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8JBTd1GZ2xrPQVVH7A", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LSCRvGt1j1aKxywc2ox58Z", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284288322 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:08.324Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SFA5CQJ4BNXSA18G8RK2", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:08.325Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SFA5CQJ4BNXSA18G8RK2", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants me to:\n1. Review an operational account (how the system is supposed to work)\n2. Compare it against a target description (how someone proposes to model it)\n3. Stop after identifying the FIRST supported formalism-specific defect with evidence\n4. Not interview them or mutate a net\n\nLet me activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first to get the full instructions for analyzing SDCPN artifacts.\n\nOperational account: \"each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nTarget description (the proposed SDCPN structure):\n- AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n- RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nThe operational account says: reviewer becomes available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded.\n\nThe target description says:\n- RecordApproval returns token to AvailableReviewer ✓\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has NO output arc returning the reviewer token ✗\n\nThis is a clear formalism-specific defect: the target structure violates the operational account because RecordRejection does not return the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer, which means the reviewer will not become available after rejection is recorded.\n\nThis is a supported formalism-specific defect because:\n- The operational process clearly states the reviewer must become available \"when either approval or rejection is recorded\"\n- The target Petri net structure explicitly lacks the arc from RecordRejection to AvailableReviewer\n- This causes a token-flow asymmetry: tokens are returned for approval but not rejection\n- This would manifest as a deadlock risk in simulation where reviewers get consumed by rejections and become permanently unavailable\n- I should confirm the skill's exact checklist for defect categories before finalizing this as the reported answer, so let me pull that up now.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01LSCRvGt1j1aKxywc2ox58Z", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LSCRvGt1j1aKxywc2ox58Z", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:08.325Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284288326 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SFA5CQJ4BNXSA18G8RK2", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:08.963Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SFA5CQJ4BNXSA18G8RK2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:08.964Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "Good", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SFA5CQJ4BNXSA18G8RK2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:09.966Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ", I have the skill loaded. Now I need to do a construct-only execution because the user has:\n1. Supplied", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SFA5CQJ4BNXSA18G8RK2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:09.966Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " a complete operational account\n2. Supplied a complete target description \n3. Asked me to review", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SFA5CQJ4BNXSA18G8RK2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:09.966Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " them against each other and find the first formalism-specific defect", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SFA5CQJ4BNXSA18G8RK2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:09.966Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "\n4. Explicitly told me not to interview or mutate a net\n\nI should read `checks.md` to", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SFA5CQJ4BNXSA18G8RK2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:10.977Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " understand what constitutes a supported formalism-specific defect in SDCPN context, then apply that to the comparison.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SFA5CQJ4BNXSA18G8RK2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:10.977Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "Good, I have the skill loaded. Now I need to do a construct-only execution because the user has:\n1. Supplied a complete operational account\n2. Supplied a complete target description \n3. Asked me to review them against each other and find the first formalism-specific defect\n4. Explicitly told me not to interview or mutate a net\n\nI should read `checks.md` to understand what constitutes a supported formalism-specific defect in SDCPN context, then apply that to the comparison.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SFA5CQJ4BNXSA18G8RK2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:10.978Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01CU3raab8HzkoAgoevXa2Bm", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SFA5CQJ4BNXSA18G8RK2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:10.979Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01CU3raab8HzkoAgoevXa2Bm", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\": \"/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SFA5CQJ4BNXSA18G8RK2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:10.979Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01CU3raab8HzkoAgoevXa2Bm", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SFA5CQJ4BNXSA18G8RK2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:10.980Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SFA5CQJ4BNXSA18G8RK2", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 2682, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8JfteqhKp7zyuxg1uA", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, I have the skill loaded. Now I need to do a construct-only execution because the user has:\n1. Supplied a complete operational account\n2. Supplied a complete target description \n3. Asked me to review them against each other and find the first formalism-specific defect\n4. Explicitly told me not to interview or mutate a net\n\nI should read `checks.md` to understand what constitutes a supported formalism-specific defect in SDCPN context, then apply that to the comparison.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01CU3raab8HzkoAgoevXa2Bm", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 216, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4250, + "totalTokens": 4478, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.00108, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.0053125, + "total": 0.0064045000000000005 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:11.007Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, I have the skill loaded. Now I need to do a construct-only execution because the user has:\n1. Supplied a complete operational account\n2. Supplied a complete target description \n3. Asked me to review them against each other and find the first formalism-specific defect\n4. Explicitly told me not to interview or mutate a net\n\nI should read `checks.md` to understand what constitutes a supported formalism-specific defect in SDCPN context, then apply that to the comparison.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01CU3raab8HzkoAgoevXa2Bm", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 216, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4250, + "totalTokens": 4478, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.00108, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.0053125, + "total": 0.0064045000000000005 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 120 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284288326, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8JfteqhKp7zyuxg1uA", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SFA5CQJ4BNXSA18G8RK2", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:11.007Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01CU3raab8HzkoAgoevXa2Bm", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SFA5CQJ4BNXSA18G8RK2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:11.008Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01CU3raab8HzkoAgoevXa2Bm", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284291009 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SFA5CQJ4BNXSA18G8RK2", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:11.009Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01CU3raab8HzkoAgoevXa2Bm", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284291009 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SFA5CQJ4BNXSA18G8RK2", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:11.010Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01CU3raab8HzkoAgoevXa2Bm", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + } + }, + "durationMs": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SFA5CQJ4BNXSA18G8RK2", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:11.011Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SFA5CQJ4BNXSA18G8RK2", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, I have the skill loaded. Now I need to do a construct-only execution because the user has:\n1. Supplied a complete operational account\n2. Supplied a complete target description \n3. Asked me to review them against each other and find the first formalism-specific defect\n4. Explicitly told me not to interview or mutate a net\n\nI should read `checks.md` to understand what constitutes a supported formalism-specific defect in SDCPN context, then apply that to the comparison.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01CU3raab8HzkoAgoevXa2Bm", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 216, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4250, + "totalTokens": 4478, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.00108, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.0053125, + "total": 0.0064045000000000005 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 120 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284288326, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8JfteqhKp7zyuxg1uA", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01CU3raab8HzkoAgoevXa2Bm", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284291009 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:11.011Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:11.011Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants me to:\n1. Review an operational account (how the system is supposed to work)\n2. Compare it against a target description (how someone proposes to model it)\n3. Stop after identifying the FIRST supported formalism-specific defect with evidence\n4. Not interview them or mutate a net\n\nLet me activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first to get the full instructions for analyzing SDCPN artifacts.\n\nOperational account: \"each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nTarget description (the proposed SDCPN structure):\n- AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n- RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nThe operational account says: reviewer becomes available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded.\n\nThe target description says:\n- RecordApproval returns token to AvailableReviewer ✓\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has NO output arc returning the reviewer token ✗\n\nThis is a clear formalism-specific defect: the target structure violates the operational account because RecordRejection does not return the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer, which means the reviewer will not become available after rejection is recorded.\n\nThis is a supported formalism-specific defect because:\n- The operational process clearly states the reviewer must become available \"when either approval or rejection is recorded\"\n- The target Petri net structure explicitly lacks the arc from RecordRejection to AvailableReviewer\n- This causes a token-flow asymmetry: tokens are returned for approval but not rejection\n- This would manifest as a deadlock risk in simulation where reviewers get consumed by rejections and become permanently unavailable\n- I should confirm the skill's exact checklist for defect categories before finalizing this as the reported answer, so let me pull that up now.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01LSCRvGt1j1aKxywc2ox58Z", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LSCRvGt1j1aKxywc2ox58Z", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, I have the skill loaded. Now I need to do a construct-only execution because the user has:\n1. Supplied a complete operational account\n2. Supplied a complete target description \n3. Asked me to review them against each other and find the first formalism-specific defect\n4. Explicitly told me not to interview or mutate a net\n\nI should read `checks.md` to understand what constitutes a supported formalism-specific defect in SDCPN context, then apply that to the comparison.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01CU3raab8HzkoAgoevXa2Bm", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01CU3raab8HzkoAgoevXa2Bm", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:11.011Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284291013 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 57, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:11.629Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 58, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:11.630Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "Perfect", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 59, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:12.633Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ". Now I have the check guidance. Looking at the structural validity section, there's a key clause:\n\n\"Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success,", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 60, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:12.633Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nNow let me analyze the comparison:\n\n**Operational account:** \"each request", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 61, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:12.633Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 62, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:13.641Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nKey facts:\n- Reviewer is reusable", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 63, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:13.641Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "\n- Becomes unavailable at start\n- Must return to available on BOTH approval AND rejection paths\n\n**Target description:**\n- Av", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 64, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:13.641Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "ailableReviewer → (supplies token) → StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress → (supplies token) → Rec", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 65, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:14.648Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "ordApproval \n- RecordApproval → (returns token) → AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has NO output", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 66, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:14.648Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " arc to AvailableReviewer\n\n**The defect:**\n\nThe target structure viol", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 67, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:14.648Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "ates the structural validity check \"Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nSpecifically:\n- RecordApproval returns the reviewer token ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 68, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:14.648Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "✓\n- RecordRejection DOES NOT return the reviewer token ✗\n\nThis means the reviewer token is not returned on the rejection path, violating the operational requirement that the reviewer \"", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 69, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:15.873Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nThis is formalism-specific evidence:\n- The arc structure explicitly shows", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 70, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:15.873Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " asymmetry between the two outcome paths\n- The missing arc from RecordRejection to AvailableReviewer would cause reviewer tokens", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 71, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:15.873Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " to be consumed and lost when rejections are recorded\n- In a Petri net, this creates a token-", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 72, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:15.873Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "flow imbalance that would be detected in simulation as a resource leak\n\nThe first and only defect I", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 73, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:17.151Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " need to identify is:\n", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 74, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:17.151Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "R", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 75, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:18.687Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "ecordRejection lacks an output arc returning the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer, violating the required behavior that reviewers return to availability on both approval and rej", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 76, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:18.687Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "ection.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 77, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:18.687Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "Perfect. Now I have the check guidance. Looking at the structural validity section, there's a key clause:\n\n\"Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nNow let me analyze the comparison:\n\n**Operational account:** \"each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nKey facts:\n- Reviewer is reusable\n- Becomes unavailable at start\n- Must return to available on BOTH approval AND rejection paths\n\n**Target description:**\n- AvailableReviewer → (supplies token) → StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress → (supplies token) → RecordApproval \n- RecordApproval → (returns token) → AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has NO output arc to AvailableReviewer\n\n**The defect:**\n\nThe target structure violates the structural validity check \"Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nSpecifically:\n- RecordApproval returns the reviewer token ✓\n- RecordRejection DOES NOT return the reviewer token ✗\n\nThis means the reviewer token is not returned on the rejection path, violating the operational requirement that the reviewer \"becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nThis is formalism-specific evidence:\n- The arc structure explicitly shows asymmetry between the two outcome paths\n- The missing arc from RecordRejection to AvailableReviewer would cause reviewer tokens to be consumed and lost when rejections are recorded\n- In a Petri net, this creates a token-flow imbalance that would be detected in simulation as a resource leak\n\nThe first and only defect I need to identify is:\nRecordRejection lacks an output arc returning the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer, violating the required behavior that reviewers return to availability on both approval and rejection.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 78, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:18.687Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "## First Supported Formalism-Specific Defect", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 79, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:18.887Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "\n\n**Defect:** RecordRejection consumes the reviewer token held in CheckInProgress but produces no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer.\n\n**Evidence and", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 80, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:18.887Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " violation:**\n\nThe operational account requires: \"the reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when **either approval or rejection is recorded**.\"\n\nThe target structure", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 81, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:18.887Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " provides:\n- RecordApproval: returns token to AvailableReviewer ✓ \n- RecordRejection: consumes CheckInProgress, no output to", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 82, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:18.887Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " AvailableReviewer ✗\n\nIn Petri net terms, this violates the structural validity requirement that \"shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the **supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths**\" (checks.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 83, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:18.887Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "md, \"Structural validity\").\n\nThe missing arc from RecordRejection to AvailableReviewer means reviewer tokens taken at the start of a rejection", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 84, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:18.887Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " will be permanently consumed and unavailable for future checks. This produces a token-flow asymmetry between the two terminal paths of a", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 85, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:18.887Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " single workflow: approval releases the resource; rejection discards it.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 86, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:18.887Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 7880, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8JsSgZuyjP2SukEGhF", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Perfect. Now I have the check guidance. Looking at the structural validity section, there's a key clause:\n\n\"Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nNow let me analyze the comparison:\n\n**Operational account:** \"each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nKey facts:\n- Reviewer is reusable\n- Becomes unavailable at start\n- Must return to available on BOTH approval AND rejection paths\n\n**Target description:**\n- AvailableReviewer → (supplies token) → StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress → (supplies token) → RecordApproval \n- RecordApproval → (returns token) → AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has NO output arc to AvailableReviewer\n\n**The defect:**\n\nThe target structure violates the structural validity check \"Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nSpecifically:\n- RecordApproval returns the reviewer token ✓\n- RecordRejection DOES NOT return the reviewer token ✗\n\nThis means the reviewer token is not returned on the rejection path, violating the operational requirement that the reviewer \"becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nThis is formalism-specific evidence:\n- The arc structure explicitly shows asymmetry between the two outcome paths\n- The missing arc from RecordRejection to AvailableReviewer would cause reviewer tokens to be consumed and lost when rejections are recorded\n- In a Petri net, this creates a token-flow imbalance that would be detected in simulation as a resource leak\n\nThe first and only defect I need to identify is:\nRecordRejection lacks an output arc returning the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer, violating the required behavior that reviewers return to availability on both approval and rejection.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "## First Supported Formalism-Specific Defect\n\n**Defect:** RecordRejection consumes the reviewer token held in CheckInProgress but produces no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer.\n\n**Evidence and violation:**\n\nThe operational account requires: \"the reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when **either approval or rejection is recorded**.\"\n\nThe target structure provides:\n- RecordApproval: returns token to AvailableReviewer ✓ \n- RecordRejection: consumes CheckInProgress, no output to AvailableReviewer ✗\n\nIn Petri net terms, this violates the structural validity requirement that \"shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the **supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths**\" (checks.md, \"Structural validity\").\n\nThe missing arc from RecordRejection to AvailableReviewer means reviewer tokens taken at the start of a rejection will be permanently consumed and unavailable for future checks. This produces a token-flow asymmetry between the two terminal paths of a single workflow: approval releases the resource; rejection discards it." + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 13, + "output": 740, + "cacheRead": 4250, + "cacheWrite": 1288, + "totalTokens": 6291, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000013, + "output": 0.0037, + "cacheRead": 0.00042500000000000003, + "cacheWrite": 0.00161, + "total": 0.0057480000000000005 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 87, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:18.891Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Perfect. Now I have the check guidance. Looking at the structural validity section, there's a key clause:\n\n\"Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nNow let me analyze the comparison:\n\n**Operational account:** \"each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nKey facts:\n- Reviewer is reusable\n- Becomes unavailable at start\n- Must return to available on BOTH approval AND rejection paths\n\n**Target description:**\n- AvailableReviewer → (supplies token) → StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress → (supplies token) → RecordApproval \n- RecordApproval → (returns token) → AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has NO output arc to AvailableReviewer\n\n**The defect:**\n\nThe target structure violates the structural validity check \"Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nSpecifically:\n- RecordApproval returns the reviewer token ✓\n- RecordRejection DOES NOT return the reviewer token ✗\n\nThis means the reviewer token is not returned on the rejection path, violating the operational requirement that the reviewer \"becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nThis is formalism-specific evidence:\n- The arc structure explicitly shows asymmetry between the two outcome paths\n- The missing arc from RecordRejection to AvailableReviewer would cause reviewer tokens to be consumed and lost when rejections are recorded\n- In a Petri net, this creates a token-flow imbalance that would be detected in simulation as a resource leak\n\nThe first and only defect I need to identify is:\nRecordRejection lacks an output arc returning the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer, violating the required behavior that reviewers return to availability on both approval and rejection.", + "thinkingSignature": "EvQRCpoBCBEYAipA1GPsLsHgUpku5v52wv450sHvYithYFb1xs5qxTBgkEY6b4CuZvO3lHnzxPfKdaQWFRmsTeTED1LNX654dCGHpjIZY2xhdWRlLWhhaWt1LTQtNS0yMDI1MTAwMTgAQgh0aGlua2luZ1okMWNiODRmYzQtNDdhYS00ZTFmLWE2NjUtOTQwYWI5ZjgxZjg4qAGKm9zUBhIMeeGCuc+AKaPmADlMGgw7WfBGt5uscWKSOOIiML4xt7N0Zh2odKFjvtPH/IISwdao4I+HXwR57SLBe3irnK61s7e4KLeOxFLVR3HTOSqGEOwCc5TxKpxH2BM5FpmcJtXS+8zLbTxUrvVBDrtA/N9mnJPBa7wt50BJt6PUhctNWo+y7mteNScq0LzZdowU9ulXsNYL9FPiYEycXYnz/Gw2KtWIzvPnqXlApPb0vcNdLf7m97QxmUtAPTIUyLa+7ZPwJB4p8DLPDPGvwZit8O0b9c5C263rtQvq+TcpFT0MR1OdqGtdUkvam6XbnzNpL9Jb7/nYBzu35sByDtT0jUVE6e6GzjGeKGdLFltzYdPde9uCDrq8PL5Arm7rd+Mr5kUXcMgMy1vJxx6KTU1WN370LgvdbnrH2XYalVJGFETNT5I53EvIZXl4mUPRgoi+FoKr3naVDn8PKjlyu2cww3cThKr7VU7iuyHbWcSOG+ppIjaoh8AmGNNtwiISZWk7MWwrhslIjX8c7hEAATfCIc6Cl8gVaMQaKd7yOrE8KOzNYCX0hYbqMYudk/OAMgZ0SpKvpmjipiIpXl0OV7iP2fqs5pqOhFB0LIFPDednZ87ELUlWVGZH7UXzNzNMXOXahyXhcQ78SrVWuTXeERUsceOJDZvSeDSbi9IuHrB/l2kBzlfZFrN/K6uHrsg7qcBbM7EAuODUe6DMENrAHjf3iOAR9tjSw9m89Rb7/5Ke1t47gCUvfkaDwPwqF/jdpep8Ulgq+h9Zp/s1oXn6RFHT6+8D+Nt6Ln2pPOTbZPHAsLDTO0BwQQEgzTtYA/QbRDR12wMuklybuZmZU8xXjznjDETCoztS8TSfsI11qEzmL38QweBfhzRO6MZ4ic5BSIJtOe1MtiHFw1X9JYclbTT+I4D0m4iN8TORqGapO9w/6//5HxWHdMJtmp0CosoaVK0pVwt7v1Y9XkmqwNw3XVjB8T0ezSnaYaAZ1x4j6UUl3MdxKVPIk06sFMzDcvcz6SWRn9wmhUA+h8DQpImwfblEcvl4ehvEl/xvEA63jwbcBO40KtElAF4qyaEzLMg7rZIwdlhUJCQo3vj12k3efCr3KWER1jc7j1ehQIvx7bsAb7IliT/ETumoZUCxPbdZhqCRE6vZtDoVATDSlSlkqWrmpTYB2KJZBF6PIr9wBnIbrBemqnS1Zq+PivJ+WbP6lfg+CROKkfABKEKQn4BMf+OcJUI44o2H3odg4XGQEG72kFFn6aMx2C6utQCkc8pfihF6e49bJI76UXfk/XJNxQaYEH75IPVqQl3mEHbjMh+aCYZwQVr3/3H6N+LjHK6PaUxDYoBURpXdwSZOu15LoPUe+Xbs2gCUToGoGBbuI51sFwwev09x6+fflQKEqAjKqs9a/J+CPNem7+m2mjC6xOHVajxtV8FZDCPka2q9ECf9J6K7kTuDnvn9bDn66ne2PWZecXTgb1sCidQqvmBbTKj1AQYT9YBjL28haECzMFuSw/75SW++5J1Gqx66LxZZ/gnDDCJ1VjOMS4BWZ5bA+nqIkGlNxMZxqcSP3OOUntNwriZ+UooiYOMyEXphkcXDc2rEf5hmp/YiWxvbED235pI6XJUAwpr0V5J2Op2RiUXP6weRWwxmAxIR/T02j/7w0Fwnkd3GtXkvcyMKOofjNhmAyXX3h24p6aqt85RZ6ACy9cOhAbBsSAaS3Z/H0ymec5pdK25MP4AQZkgWXx/Ptng9ccqN/VTYLXkj76F0Zq1OkeU2pO2yG6VGhR27/tn/4ufns58CDK1K/PKn75EckNqpN9Fa7V+3+sofrsrpn1+JAAtazkKJHkqHik54JYFW5195YcpIoNtUXyZgjHRTlLygEabc64kpb3vW8XO1XYfdjM50luINJG7npIcX5mOuLK13UBbEACnvQjTA23r1dZ7bMZjmjHQ8u+dImh50PAeGg7gHaqIAzuCOQPJlUgexTx82QyVDBrcFGEmTLnmO9vS2fmvlT/GoiyWb5GceFBEl3HiCagu+MbDRWKxCXfeLyRg+mFPjeURdCp0YEIdRDKPIgwXPFX7GgagpHcveuo0ZKHWj78CE32hk8nh5juJI2OukfyQTHBQpZK6vThnbL6tbvdoEgXfiXgyP34RVFSkRuvjDEfwPJGDI0oJmcEogkaWYXHHyoWIcAB8ILh+Y/njWJ98QlwxSlMNT494N0s+N8POq/lgikyofyVYhukyIZ0hymSHx2rtOswFGpkk2WcFZsdHM/sxEJfv6YMVS5Jf+DEaSfB/rvyy6tg3VrVOBJ4/i40BkcRVAB7+pTqWlB2rjXU6758T/35cUmdCO8OBUjzDBRXOEEyMa+lV0S2gx+dDb4NQdQi4XXShHMhuE1vDmt4Oge21TAo+6Mcg29kAywukZkpzlye8hW9QKpggz3S27CHYsklGtsp4E72xmiEz8Ji5sAO7Ej8kaahmUe4ccIUM51koG9LZRB9Bvzn21ouKM+/ygEacAt5dFS9GceBQSHJQxiW6ZiO5byw5c0zWUAER/2B9994G7hjJpymSOk1S8Sk2/ZEbr4vizI6J3wmDrP8MWYr/Acak59FdGHh+nWPs03yuTXtWBt9eqySQQhR3cYTCtchS39K4zbLNht5lppntc0gXedk25N8jfrrDtg/P/R6KMNe+3XXwBsEx1PLp3xFmZIAXmLJaDjW5AsPLS3QkzXM+euCPTz60E49mbyq4aL1U4c6x5AYN1xunFnemvoBlz+0dPsAMinwb/vR//HsXjd/LwR3X3wFreA3QQO/sp1jfJA4wmgWmLYV+aN/oBTydZV5+6Gp1cwiJ1/HMFgSXwmQB9xOGHGAE=" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "## First Supported Formalism-Specific Defect\n\n**Defect:** RecordRejection consumes the reviewer token held in CheckInProgress but produces no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer.\n\n**Evidence and violation:**\n\nThe operational account requires: \"the reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when **either approval or rejection is recorded**.\"\n\nThe target structure provides:\n- RecordApproval: returns token to AvailableReviewer ✓ \n- RecordRejection: consumes CheckInProgress, no output to AvailableReviewer ✗\n\nIn Petri net terms, this violates the structural validity requirement that \"shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the **supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths**\" (checks.md, \"Structural validity\").\n\nThe missing arc from RecordRejection to AvailableReviewer means reviewer tokens taken at the start of a rejection will be permanently consumed and unavailable for future checks. This produces a token-flow asymmetry between the two terminal paths of a single workflow: approval releases the resource; rejection discards it." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 13, + "output": 740, + "cacheRead": 4250, + "cacheWrite": 1288, + "totalTokens": 6291, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000013, + "output": 0.0037, + "cacheRead": 0.00042500000000000003, + "cacheWrite": 0.00161, + "total": 0.0057480000000000005 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 471 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284291013, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8JsSgZuyjP2SukEGhF", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 88, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:18.891Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SHY389XJ3DVXGB8C366K", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Perfect. Now I have the check guidance. Looking at the structural validity section, there's a key clause:\n\n\"Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nNow let me analyze the comparison:\n\n**Operational account:** \"each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nKey facts:\n- Reviewer is reusable\n- Becomes unavailable at start\n- Must return to available on BOTH approval AND rejection paths\n\n**Target description:**\n- AvailableReviewer → (supplies token) → StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress → (supplies token) → RecordApproval \n- RecordApproval → (returns token) → AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has NO output arc to AvailableReviewer\n\n**The defect:**\n\nThe target structure violates the structural validity check \"Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nSpecifically:\n- RecordApproval returns the reviewer token ✓\n- RecordRejection DOES NOT return the reviewer token ✗\n\nThis means the reviewer token is not returned on the rejection path, violating the operational requirement that the reviewer \"becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nThis is formalism-specific evidence:\n- The arc structure explicitly shows asymmetry between the two outcome paths\n- The missing arc from RecordRejection to AvailableReviewer would cause reviewer tokens to be consumed and lost when rejections are recorded\n- In a Petri net, this creates a token-flow imbalance that would be detected in simulation as a resource leak\n\nThe first and only defect I need to identify is:\nRecordRejection lacks an output arc returning the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer, violating the required behavior that reviewers return to availability on both approval and rejection.", + "thinkingSignature": "EvQRCpoBCBEYAipA1GPsLsHgUpku5v52wv450sHvYithYFb1xs5qxTBgkEY6b4CuZvO3lHnzxPfKdaQWFRmsTeTED1LNX654dCGHpjIZY2xhdWRlLWhhaWt1LTQtNS0yMDI1MTAwMTgAQgh0aGlua2luZ1okMWNiODRmYzQtNDdhYS00ZTFmLWE2NjUtOTQwYWI5ZjgxZjg4qAGKm9zUBhIMeeGCuc+AKaPmADlMGgw7WfBGt5uscWKSOOIiML4xt7N0Zh2odKFjvtPH/IISwdao4I+HXwR57SLBe3irnK61s7e4KLeOxFLVR3HTOSqGEOwCc5TxKpxH2BM5FpmcJtXS+8zLbTxUrvVBDrtA/N9mnJPBa7wt50BJt6PUhctNWo+y7mteNScq0LzZdowU9ulXsNYL9FPiYEycXYnz/Gw2KtWIzvPnqXlApPb0vcNdLf7m97QxmUtAPTIUyLa+7ZPwJB4p8DLPDPGvwZit8O0b9c5C263rtQvq+TcpFT0MR1OdqGtdUkvam6XbnzNpL9Jb7/nYBzu35sByDtT0jUVE6e6GzjGeKGdLFltzYdPde9uCDrq8PL5Arm7rd+Mr5kUXcMgMy1vJxx6KTU1WN370LgvdbnrH2XYalVJGFETNT5I53EvIZXl4mUPRgoi+FoKr3naVDn8PKjlyu2cww3cThKr7VU7iuyHbWcSOG+ppIjaoh8AmGNNtwiISZWk7MWwrhslIjX8c7hEAATfCIc6Cl8gVaMQaKd7yOrE8KOzNYCX0hYbqMYudk/OAMgZ0SpKvpmjipiIpXl0OV7iP2fqs5pqOhFB0LIFPDednZ87ELUlWVGZH7UXzNzNMXOXahyXhcQ78SrVWuTXeERUsceOJDZvSeDSbi9IuHrB/l2kBzlfZFrN/K6uHrsg7qcBbM7EAuODUe6DMENrAHjf3iOAR9tjSw9m89Rb7/5Ke1t47gCUvfkaDwPwqF/jdpep8Ulgq+h9Zp/s1oXn6RFHT6+8D+Nt6Ln2pPOTbZPHAsLDTO0BwQQEgzTtYA/QbRDR12wMuklybuZmZU8xXjznjDETCoztS8TSfsI11qEzmL38QweBfhzRO6MZ4ic5BSIJtOe1MtiHFw1X9JYclbTT+I4D0m4iN8TORqGapO9w/6//5HxWHdMJtmp0CosoaVK0pVwt7v1Y9XkmqwNw3XVjB8T0ezSnaYaAZ1x4j6UUl3MdxKVPIk06sFMzDcvcz6SWRn9wmhUA+h8DQpImwfblEcvl4ehvEl/xvEA63jwbcBO40KtElAF4qyaEzLMg7rZIwdlhUJCQo3vj12k3efCr3KWER1jc7j1ehQIvx7bsAb7IliT/ETumoZUCxPbdZhqCRE6vZtDoVATDSlSlkqWrmpTYB2KJZBF6PIr9wBnIbrBemqnS1Zq+PivJ+WbP6lfg+CROKkfABKEKQn4BMf+OcJUI44o2H3odg4XGQEG72kFFn6aMx2C6utQCkc8pfihF6e49bJI76UXfk/XJNxQaYEH75IPVqQl3mEHbjMh+aCYZwQVr3/3H6N+LjHK6PaUxDYoBURpXdwSZOu15LoPUe+Xbs2gCUToGoGBbuI51sFwwev09x6+fflQKEqAjKqs9a/J+CPNem7+m2mjC6xOHVajxtV8FZDCPka2q9ECf9J6K7kTuDnvn9bDn66ne2PWZecXTgb1sCidQqvmBbTKj1AQYT9YBjL28haECzMFuSw/75SW++5J1Gqx66LxZZ/gnDDCJ1VjOMS4BWZ5bA+nqIkGlNxMZxqcSP3OOUntNwriZ+UooiYOMyEXphkcXDc2rEf5hmp/YiWxvbED235pI6XJUAwpr0V5J2Op2RiUXP6weRWwxmAxIR/T02j/7w0Fwnkd3GtXkvcyMKOofjNhmAyXX3h24p6aqt85RZ6ACy9cOhAbBsSAaS3Z/H0ymec5pdK25MP4AQZkgWXx/Ptng9ccqN/VTYLXkj76F0Zq1OkeU2pO2yG6VGhR27/tn/4ufns58CDK1K/PKn75EckNqpN9Fa7V+3+sofrsrpn1+JAAtazkKJHkqHik54JYFW5195YcpIoNtUXyZgjHRTlLygEabc64kpb3vW8XO1XYfdjM50luINJG7npIcX5mOuLK13UBbEACnvQjTA23r1dZ7bMZjmjHQ8u+dImh50PAeGg7gHaqIAzuCOQPJlUgexTx82QyVDBrcFGEmTLnmO9vS2fmvlT/GoiyWb5GceFBEl3HiCagu+MbDRWKxCXfeLyRg+mFPjeURdCp0YEIdRDKPIgwXPFX7GgagpHcveuo0ZKHWj78CE32hk8nh5juJI2OukfyQTHBQpZK6vThnbL6tbvdoEgXfiXgyP34RVFSkRuvjDEfwPJGDI0oJmcEogkaWYXHHyoWIcAB8ILh+Y/njWJ98QlwxSlMNT494N0s+N8POq/lgikyofyVYhukyIZ0hymSHx2rtOswFGpkk2WcFZsdHM/sxEJfv6YMVS5Jf+DEaSfB/rvyy6tg3VrVOBJ4/i40BkcRVAB7+pTqWlB2rjXU6758T/35cUmdCO8OBUjzDBRXOEEyMa+lV0S2gx+dDb4NQdQi4XXShHMhuE1vDmt4Oge21TAo+6Mcg29kAywukZkpzlye8hW9QKpggz3S27CHYsklGtsp4E72xmiEz8Ji5sAO7Ej8kaahmUe4ccIUM51koG9LZRB9Bvzn21ouKM+/ygEacAt5dFS9GceBQSHJQxiW6ZiO5byw5c0zWUAER/2B9994G7hjJpymSOk1S8Sk2/ZEbr4vizI6J3wmDrP8MWYr/Acak59FdGHh+nWPs03yuTXtWBt9eqySQQhR3cYTCtchS39K4zbLNht5lppntc0gXedk25N8jfrrDtg/P/R6KMNe+3XXwBsEx1PLp3xFmZIAXmLJaDjW5AsPLS3QkzXM+euCPTz60E49mbyq4aL1U4c6x5AYN1xunFnemvoBlz+0dPsAMinwb/vR//HsXjd/LwR3X3wFreA3QQO/sp1jfJA4wmgWmLYV+aN/oBTydZV5+6Gp1cwiJ1/HMFgSXwmQB9xOGHGAE=" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "## First Supported Formalism-Specific Defect\n\n**Defect:** RecordRejection consumes the reviewer token held in CheckInProgress but produces no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer.\n\n**Evidence and violation:**\n\nThe operational account requires: \"the reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when **either approval or rejection is recorded**.\"\n\nThe target structure provides:\n- RecordApproval: returns token to AvailableReviewer ✓ \n- RecordRejection: consumes CheckInProgress, no output to AvailableReviewer ✗\n\nIn Petri net terms, this violates the structural validity requirement that \"shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the **supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths**\" (checks.md, \"Structural validity\").\n\nThe missing arc from RecordRejection to AvailableReviewer means reviewer tokens taken at the start of a rejection will be permanently consumed and unavailable for future checks. This produces a token-flow asymmetry between the two terminal paths of a single workflow: approval releases the resource; rejection discards it." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 13, + "output": 740, + "cacheRead": 4250, + "cacheWrite": 1288, + "totalTokens": 6291, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000013, + "output": 0.0037, + "cacheRead": 0.00042500000000000003, + "cacheWrite": 0.00161, + "total": 0.0057480000000000005 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 471 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284291013, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8JsSgZuyjP2SukEGhF", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 89, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:18.891Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants me to:\n1. Review an operational account (how the system is supposed to work)\n2. Compare it against a target description (how someone proposes to model it)\n3. Stop after identifying the FIRST supported formalism-specific defect with evidence\n4. Not interview them or mutate a net\n\nLet me activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first to get the full instructions for analyzing SDCPN artifacts.\n\nOperational account: \"each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nTarget description (the proposed SDCPN structure):\n- AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n- RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nThe operational account says: reviewer becomes available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded.\n\nThe target description says:\n- RecordApproval returns token to AvailableReviewer ✓\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has NO output arc returning the reviewer token ✗\n\nThis is a clear formalism-specific defect: the target structure violates the operational account because RecordRejection does not return the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer, which means the reviewer will not become available after rejection is recorded.\n\nThis is a supported formalism-specific defect because:\n- The operational process clearly states the reviewer must become available \"when either approval or rejection is recorded\"\n- The target Petri net structure explicitly lacks the arc from RecordRejection to AvailableReviewer\n- This causes a token-flow asymmetry: tokens are returned for approval but not rejection\n- This would manifest as a deadlock risk in simulation where reviewers get consumed by rejections and become permanently unavailable\n- I should confirm the skill's exact checklist for defect categories before finalizing this as the reported answer, so let me pull that up now.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01LSCRvGt1j1aKxywc2ox58Z", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2590, + "output": 531, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3121, + "cost": { + "input": 0.00259, + "output": 0.0026550000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005245 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 469 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284281667, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8JBTd1GZ2xrPQVVH7A", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LSCRvGt1j1aKxywc2ox58Z", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted `elicitation` skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284288322 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, I have the skill loaded. Now I need to do a construct-only execution because the user has:\n1. Supplied a complete operational account\n2. Supplied a complete target description \n3. Asked me to review them against each other and find the first formalism-specific defect\n4. Explicitly told me not to interview or mutate a net\n\nI should read `checks.md` to understand what constitutes a supported formalism-specific defect in SDCPN context, then apply that to the comparison.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01CU3raab8HzkoAgoevXa2Bm", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 216, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4250, + "totalTokens": 4478, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.00108, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.0053125, + "total": 0.0064045000000000005 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 120 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284288326, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8JfteqhKp7zyuxg1uA", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01CU3raab8HzkoAgoevXa2Bm", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3Aa63c18f6ff2bfa97/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284291009 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Perfect. Now I have the check guidance. Looking at the structural validity section, there's a key clause:\n\n\"Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nNow let me analyze the comparison:\n\n**Operational account:** \"each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nKey facts:\n- Reviewer is reusable\n- Becomes unavailable at start\n- Must return to available on BOTH approval AND rejection paths\n\n**Target description:**\n- AvailableReviewer → (supplies token) → StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress → (supplies token) → RecordApproval \n- RecordApproval → (returns token) → AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has NO output arc to AvailableReviewer\n\n**The defect:**\n\nThe target structure violates the structural validity check \"Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nSpecifically:\n- RecordApproval returns the reviewer token ✓\n- RecordRejection DOES NOT return the reviewer token ✗\n\nThis means the reviewer token is not returned on the rejection path, violating the operational requirement that the reviewer \"becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nThis is formalism-specific evidence:\n- The arc structure explicitly shows asymmetry between the two outcome paths\n- The missing arc from RecordRejection to AvailableReviewer would cause reviewer tokens to be consumed and lost when rejections are recorded\n- In a Petri net, this creates a token-flow imbalance that would be detected in simulation as a resource leak\n\nThe first and only defect I need to identify is:\nRecordRejection lacks an output arc returning the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer, violating the required behavior that reviewers return to availability on both approval and rejection.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "## First Supported Formalism-Specific Defect\n\n**Defect:** RecordRejection consumes the reviewer token held in CheckInProgress but produces no output arc returning it to AvailableReviewer.\n\n**Evidence and violation:**\n\nThe operational account requires: \"the reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when **either approval or rejection is recorded**.\"\n\nThe target structure provides:\n- RecordApproval: returns token to AvailableReviewer ✓ \n- RecordRejection: consumes CheckInProgress, no output to AvailableReviewer ✗\n\nIn Petri net terms, this violates the structural validity requirement that \"shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the **supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths**\" (checks.md, \"Structural validity\").\n\nThe missing arc from RecordRejection to AvailableReviewer means reviewer tokens taken at the start of a rejection will be permanently consumed and unavailable for future checks. This produces a token-flow asymmetry between the two terminal paths of a single workflow: approval releases the resource; rejection discards it." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 13, + "output": 740, + "cacheRead": 4250, + "cacheWrite": 1288, + "totalTokens": 6291, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000013, + "output": 0.0037, + "cacheRead": 0.00042500000000000003, + "cacheWrite": 0.00161, + "total": 0.0057480000000000005 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 471 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284291013, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8JsSgZuyjP2SukEGhF", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 90, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:18.892Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 17244, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 91, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:18.892Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0S8RPXG3MXEKQDZK9VCCK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0S8SG8948ZKBVFK1JHV7D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 92, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:18.892Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0S8RK792WENJWZ8QFKTTJ", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "53c0a4561fda619708f811871a85bf05a8315435b6f5e459e0f9ea719f019e5d", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 93, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:18.892Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "d2d42344c40ddeb2471eeeba437032079bd2c7083afdbc2f9de5e823f841d5b8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "ebec2ac5faab6cbbbe26eeeebc2d7ac0ba7dc637fd43ea9b5917f8e0277f5515", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "c7cb5b2222b0d1b5aff861c4056f41ba8825aca284ec774d8e4f0fbf12807314", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "321f8405c12374315d61caf466001d6b4b5cf68b04325df77a7948daaa680de1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/scenarios.json": "1844df940b8de9d10d28e9537f966920aba581b36956a9ac26a3767824ca96cb", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/protocol.md": "ef1443bb02c6c26d4ded6edf9e023579bc32cdc394f90490edfb34eaf32b8ed2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md": "8cd2749c8292f01045ab4282fc7248c07046cecaf14a586a9ef286e2876cf8bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md": "82b035268c07cc8ee4736b5ffdd392c8f153793d2ca6b9ed57271c9b6146de10", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md": "8826b85d32d6c24fbc8f678ec394600676ec61c4a0b83d0a9cfa16be87fc5d76", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "1a2417cc5f9649d459c5efbc87cd3242db99a9717622a6d86073c72835818865" + }, + "promptSelection": { + "candidateCorePromptIncluded": true, + "v3SdcpnAppendIncluded": true, + "legacyCorePromptIncluded": false, + "legacyRoleMarkerIncluded": false, + "initialSystemPromptSha256": "2156970b82b41d6893d08177fad8127a336be4afb5fd0bb184a52a7f63878fb8" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "candidateCorePrompt": "6a458c0bbbc9dee5b4454a54b032818227ab681ba9f7beaa60d4fe9628f6eb41", + "v3SdcpnAppend": "73cac46487d33051a90cc487ea7abfc11fec4b049af11a108396ec08d44569fb", + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S3-packaged-r1.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S3-packaged-r1.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..7ffba87df20 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S3-packaged-r1.json @@ -0,0 +1,1053 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v3-packaged-s3-36ebbcf7", + "phase": "paid", + "instrumentVersion": "v3", + "candidate": "packaged", + "scenarioId": "S3", + "scenario": { + "title": "Review with a resolvable target defect", + "prompt": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token.", + "stopAfter": "The first supported defect finding.", + "expected": "Identify the missing reviewer return on rejection without loading universal elicitation." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "**Defect: Missing output arc from RecordRejection to AvailableReviewer**\n\n**Evidence:**\n\nOperational account specifies: \"becomes available again when either **approval or rejection** is recorded.\"\n\nTarget description specifies: \"RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has **no output arc returning the reviewer token**.\"\n\nWhen RecordRejection fires in the proposed net, it removes the token from CheckInProgress but does not produce a token in AvailableReviewer. This leaves the reviewer unavailable permanently in the rejection case, violating the operational requirement that the reviewer must be available again in both outcomes (approval and rejection).\n\nThe formalism-specific defect is the absence of an output arc: RecordRejection → AvailableReviewer.", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "activatedSkills": [], + "toolCalls": [], + "readOutputs": [], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 7989, + "inputTokens": 2538, + "outputTokens": 798, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 3336, + "cost": 0.006528000000000001 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 7989, + "inputTokens": 2538, + "outputTokens": 798, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 3336, + "cost": 0.006528000000000001 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nReview the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token.\n\n## Assistant\n**Defect: Missing output arc from RecordRejection to AvailableReviewer**\n\n**Evidence:**\n\nOperational account specifies: \"becomes available again when either **approval or rejection** is recorded.\"\n\nTarget description specifies: \"RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has **no output arc returning the reviewer token**.\"\n\nWhen RecordRejection fires in the proposed net, it removes the token from CheckInProgress but does not produce a token in AvailableReviewer. This leaves the reviewer unavailable permanently in the rejection case, violating the operational requirement that the reviewer must be available again in both outcomes (approval and rejection).\n\nThe formalism-specific defect is the absence of an output arc: RecordRejection → AvailableReviewer.", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000017", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFGMFJEVzRUNkY4N1RGWjlINTVaMlNF", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1F0RESJC0HNXHCKPKAMF0PY", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RDX3NP5AT9PVCEB1C5A5", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The user is asking me to review an operational account against a target SDCPN description. Let me understand what they're asking:\n\n1. Operational account: describes what should happen\n - Each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start\n - The reviewer is unavailable during the check\n - The reviewer becomes available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded\n\n2. Target description: describes a proposed SDCPN design\n - AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck\n - CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n - RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer\n - RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nNow I need to identify a formalism-specific defect. Let me think about what the SDCPN semantics would be:\n\nIn a Petri net:\n- Places hold tokens\n- Transitions fire (move tokens based on input and output arcs)\n- An arc from a place to a transition means the transition consumes a token from that place\n- An arc from a transition to a place means the transition produces a token in that place\n\nLooking at the operational account: \"becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded\"\n\nLooking at the target description:\n- RecordApproval returns the token to AvailableReviewer ✓ (covers approval case)\n- RecordRejection has no output arc returning the reviewer token ✗ (does not cover rejection case)\n\nThis is a defect! When RecordRejection fires, it consumes the token from CheckInProgress but doesn't return the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer. This violates the operational account which states the reviewer should become available again when rejection is recorded.\n\nThe evidence is clear:\n- Operational requirement: reviewer must be returned in both approval AND rejection cases\n- Target design: RecordRejection explicitly has \"no output arc returning the reviewer token\"\n- This causes the reviewer to become permanently unavailable after a rejection outcome, contradicting the stated reuse requirement.\n\nSo the formalism-specific defect is: a missing output arc from RecordRejection back to AvailableReviewer.\n\nGiven the instruction to stop after the first defect and its evidence, without interviewing or mutating, I'll present just this finding and stop there — no skill invocation, no follow-up questions, no net changes.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "**Defect: Missing output arc from RecordRejection to AvailableReviewer**\n\n**Evidence:**\n\nOperational account specifies: \"becomes available again when either **approval or rejection** is recorded.\"\n\nTarget description specifies: \"RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has **no output arc returning the reviewer token**.\"\n\nWhen RecordRejection fires in the proposed net, it removes the token from CheckInProgress but does not produce a token in AvailableReviewer. This leaves the reviewer unavailable permanently in the rejection case, violating the operational requirement that the reviewer must be available again in both outcomes (approval and rejection).\n\nThe formalism-specific defect is the absence of an output arc: RecordRejection → AvailableReviewer.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1F0RDW5NJ6CFC036KR2B8MN" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:34.086Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:34.089Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RDWXSNDPAJS3GRE87ACC", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:34.109Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RDWXSNDPAJS3GRE87ACC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:34.114Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RDX3NP5AT9PVCEB1C5A5", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RDWXSNDPAJS3GRE87ACC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:34.115Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RDX3NP5AT9PVCEB1C5A5", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RDWXSNDPAJS3GRE87ACC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:34.115Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284254125 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RDX3NP5AT9PVCEB1C5A5", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RDWXSNDPAJS3GRE87ACC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:35.027Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RDWXSNDPAJS3GRE87ACC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RDX3NP5AT9PVCEB1C5A5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:35.029Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "The", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RDWXSNDPAJS3GRE87ACC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RDX3NP5AT9PVCEB1C5A5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:36.032Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " user is asking me to review an", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RDWXSNDPAJS3GRE87ACC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RDX3NP5AT9PVCEB1C5A5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:36.032Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " operational account against a target", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RDWXSNDPAJS3GRE87ACC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RDX3NP5AT9PVCEB1C5A5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:36.033Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " SDCPN description. Let me understand what they're asking:\n\n1. Operational account: describes what should happen\n - Each request check reserves one reus", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RDWXSNDPAJS3GRE87ACC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RDX3NP5AT9PVCEB1C5A5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:36.033Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "able reviewer at start\n - The reviewer is unavailable during the check\n - The reviewer becomes available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded\n\n2. Target description: describes a proposed SDCPN design\n - AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck\n - CheckInProgress supplies", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RDWXSNDPAJS3GRE87ACC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RDX3NP5AT9PVCEB1C5A5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:36.033Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n - RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer\n - RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nNow I need to identify a formalism-specific defect. Let me think about what the SDCPN semant", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RDWXSNDPAJS3GRE87ACC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RDX3NP5AT9PVCEB1C5A5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:37.041Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "ics would be:\n\nIn a Petri net:\n- Places hold tokens\n- Transitions fire (move tokens based", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RDWXSNDPAJS3GRE87ACC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RDX3NP5AT9PVCEB1C5A5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:37.041Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " on input and output arcs)\n- An arc from a place to a transition means the transition consumes a token from that place\n- An arc from a transition to a", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RDWXSNDPAJS3GRE87ACC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RDX3NP5AT9PVCEB1C5A5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:37.041Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " place means the transition produces a token in that place\n\nLooking at the operational account: \"becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded\"\n\nLooking at the target description:\n- RecordApproval returns the token to AvailableReviewer ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RDWXSNDPAJS3GRE87ACC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RDX3NP5AT9PVCEB1C5A5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:38.102Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "✓ (covers approval case)\n- RecordRejection has no output arc returning the reviewer token ✗ (does not cover rejection case)\n\nThis is a defect! When RecordRejection fires, it cons", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RDWXSNDPAJS3GRE87ACC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RDX3NP5AT9PVCEB1C5A5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:38.102Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "umes the token from CheckInProgress but doesn't return the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer. This violates the operational account which states the reviewer should become available again when rejection", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RDWXSNDPAJS3GRE87ACC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RDX3NP5AT9PVCEB1C5A5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:38.102Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " is recorded.\n\nThe evidence is clear:\n- Operational requirement: reviewer must be returned in both approval AND rejection cases\n- Target design: RecordRejection explicitly", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RDWXSNDPAJS3GRE87ACC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RDX3NP5AT9PVCEB1C5A5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:38.102Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " has \"no output arc returning the reviewer token\"\n", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RDWXSNDPAJS3GRE87ACC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RDX3NP5AT9PVCEB1C5A5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:39.307Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "-", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RDWXSNDPAJS3GRE87ACC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RDX3NP5AT9PVCEB1C5A5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:41.567Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " This causes the reviewer to become permanently unavailable after a rejection outcome, contradicting the stated reuse requirement.\n\nSo the formalism-specific defect is: a missing output arc from R", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RDWXSNDPAJS3GRE87ACC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RDX3NP5AT9PVCEB1C5A5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:41.567Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "ecordRejection back to AvailableReviewer.\n\nGiven the instruction to stop after the first defect and its evidence, without interviewing or mutating, I'll present just this fin", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RDWXSNDPAJS3GRE87ACC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RDX3NP5AT9PVCEB1C5A5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:41.990Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "ding and stop there — no skill invocation, no follow-up questions, no net changes.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RDWXSNDPAJS3GRE87ACC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RDX3NP5AT9PVCEB1C5A5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:41.990Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "The user is asking me to review an operational account against a target SDCPN description. Let me understand what they're asking:\n\n1. Operational account: describes what should happen\n - Each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start\n - The reviewer is unavailable during the check\n - The reviewer becomes available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded\n\n2. Target description: describes a proposed SDCPN design\n - AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck\n - CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n - RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer\n - RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nNow I need to identify a formalism-specific defect. Let me think about what the SDCPN semantics would be:\n\nIn a Petri net:\n- Places hold tokens\n- Transitions fire (move tokens based on input and output arcs)\n- An arc from a place to a transition means the transition consumes a token from that place\n- An arc from a transition to a place means the transition produces a token in that place\n\nLooking at the operational account: \"becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded\"\n\nLooking at the target description:\n- RecordApproval returns the token to AvailableReviewer ✓ (covers approval case)\n- RecordRejection has no output arc returning the reviewer token ✗ (does not cover rejection case)\n\nThis is a defect! When RecordRejection fires, it consumes the token from CheckInProgress but doesn't return the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer. This violates the operational account which states the reviewer should become available again when rejection is recorded.\n\nThe evidence is clear:\n- Operational requirement: reviewer must be returned in both approval AND rejection cases\n- Target design: RecordRejection explicitly has \"no output arc returning the reviewer token\"\n- This causes the reviewer to become permanently unavailable after a rejection outcome, contradicting the stated reuse requirement.\n\nSo the formalism-specific defect is: a missing output arc from RecordRejection back to AvailableReviewer.\n\nGiven the instruction to stop after the first defect and its evidence, without interviewing or mutating, I'll present just this finding and stop there — no skill invocation, no follow-up questions, no net changes.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RDWXSNDPAJS3GRE87ACC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RDX3NP5AT9PVCEB1C5A5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:41.990Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "**Defect: Missing output arc from RecordRejection to AvailableReviewer**\n\n**Evidence:**\n\nOperational account spec", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RDWXSNDPAJS3GRE87ACC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RDX3NP5AT9PVCEB1C5A5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:42.063Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ifies: \"becomes available again when either **approval or rejection** is recorded.\"\n\nTarget description specifies: \"RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has **no output arc returning the reviewer token**.\"\n\nWhen RecordRejection fires in the proposed", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RDWXSNDPAJS3GRE87ACC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RDX3NP5AT9PVCEB1C5A5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:42.063Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " net, it removes the token from CheckInProgress but does not produce a token in AvailableReviewer. This leaves the reviewer unavailable permanently in the rejection case, violating the operational requirement that the reviewer must", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RDWXSNDPAJS3GRE87ACC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RDX3NP5AT9PVCEB1C5A5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:42.063Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " be available again in both outcomes (approval and rejection).\n\nThe formalism-specific defect is the absence of an output arc: RecordRejection → AvailableReviewer.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RDWXSNDPAJS3GRE87ACC", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RDX3NP5AT9PVCEB1C5A5", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:42.063Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RDX3NP5AT9PVCEB1C5A5", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 7989, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8G9cwX8u2dJmRa4cpN", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to review an operational account against a target SDCPN description. Let me understand what they're asking:\n\n1. Operational account: describes what should happen\n - Each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start\n - The reviewer is unavailable during the check\n - The reviewer becomes available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded\n\n2. Target description: describes a proposed SDCPN design\n - AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck\n - CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n - RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer\n - RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nNow I need to identify a formalism-specific defect. Let me think about what the SDCPN semantics would be:\n\nIn a Petri net:\n- Places hold tokens\n- Transitions fire (move tokens based on input and output arcs)\n- An arc from a place to a transition means the transition consumes a token from that place\n- An arc from a transition to a place means the transition produces a token in that place\n\nLooking at the operational account: \"becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded\"\n\nLooking at the target description:\n- RecordApproval returns the token to AvailableReviewer ✓ (covers approval case)\n- RecordRejection has no output arc returning the reviewer token ✗ (does not cover rejection case)\n\nThis is a defect! When RecordRejection fires, it consumes the token from CheckInProgress but doesn't return the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer. This violates the operational account which states the reviewer should become available again when rejection is recorded.\n\nThe evidence is clear:\n- Operational requirement: reviewer must be returned in both approval AND rejection cases\n- Target design: RecordRejection explicitly has \"no output arc returning the reviewer token\"\n- This causes the reviewer to become permanently unavailable after a rejection outcome, contradicting the stated reuse requirement.\n\nSo the formalism-specific defect is: a missing output arc from RecordRejection back to AvailableReviewer.\n\nGiven the instruction to stop after the first defect and its evidence, without interviewing or mutating, I'll present just this finding and stop there — no skill invocation, no follow-up questions, no net changes.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "**Defect: Missing output arc from RecordRejection to AvailableReviewer**\n\n**Evidence:**\n\nOperational account specifies: \"becomes available again when either **approval or rejection** is recorded.\"\n\nTarget description specifies: \"RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has **no output arc returning the reviewer token**.\"\n\nWhen RecordRejection fires in the proposed net, it removes the token from CheckInProgress but does not produce a token in AvailableReviewer. This leaves the reviewer unavailable permanently in the rejection case, violating the operational requirement that the reviewer must be available again in both outcomes (approval and rejection).\n\nThe formalism-specific defect is the absence of an output arc: RecordRejection → AvailableReviewer." + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2538, + "output": 798, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3336, + "cost": { + "input": 0.002538, + "output": 0.0039900000000000005, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.006528000000000001 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RDWXSNDPAJS3GRE87ACC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:42.104Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to review an operational account against a target SDCPN description. Let me understand what they're asking:\n\n1. Operational account: describes what should happen\n - Each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start\n - The reviewer is unavailable during the check\n - The reviewer becomes available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded\n\n2. Target description: describes a proposed SDCPN design\n - AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck\n - CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n - RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer\n - RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nNow I need to identify a formalism-specific defect. Let me think about what the SDCPN semantics would be:\n\nIn a Petri net:\n- Places hold tokens\n- Transitions fire (move tokens based on input and output arcs)\n- An arc from a place to a transition means the transition consumes a token from that place\n- An arc from a transition to a place means the transition produces a token in that place\n\nLooking at the operational account: \"becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded\"\n\nLooking at the target description:\n- RecordApproval returns the token to AvailableReviewer ✓ (covers approval case)\n- RecordRejection has no output arc returning the reviewer token ✗ (does not cover rejection case)\n\nThis is a defect! When RecordRejection fires, it consumes the token from CheckInProgress but doesn't return the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer. This violates the operational account which states the reviewer should become available again when rejection is recorded.\n\nThe evidence is clear:\n- Operational requirement: reviewer must be returned in both approval AND rejection cases\n- Target design: RecordRejection explicitly has \"no output arc returning the reviewer token\"\n- This causes the reviewer to become permanently unavailable after a rejection outcome, contradicting the stated reuse requirement.\n\nSo the formalism-specific defect is: a missing output arc from RecordRejection back to AvailableReviewer.\n\nGiven the instruction to stop after the first defect and its evidence, without interviewing or mutating, I'll present just this finding and stop there — no skill invocation, no follow-up questions, no net changes.", + "thinkingSignature": "ErgWCpoBCBEYAipAsx9KnbM9xIuMl0zKew9oNVLQ8mPsdeKjoy2rcKrbWbJ1k8/RNDv530wBvMMmoZRLQcsnRoyOH2b5WiYlUXWrQjIZY2xhdWRlLWhhaWt1LTQtNS0yMDI1MTAwMTgAQgh0aGlua2luZ1okMWNiODRmYzQtNDdhYS00ZTFmLWE2NjUtOTQwYWI5ZjgxZjg4qAHlmtzUBhIM6SG4sclC6rbzemHHGgyt5+mHklJCSxckLjgiMF4Yyu3dyWT9TF8QLmxn5G0jrqdFPV8Trgku80M7rLZgz8tgu5DxhGtlekdsyeywnSrKFCsXHznpClSYupLfuVLGJyFUqS3VykVFRiM0Q/T8/K2k4kb9ijCvQTTxcxf9Ij5tozUFBw/CnJQKVFo5yZ/jkevvevqXMxl8ZHnmJU8CsRs268EU74P+390DXIktDGna7oeA8esAaVH5xLLJISRZrs6C7ksDAxMgZgWCzH+TgRWxwP768KeLGk3/mQbBjSg4EkD/h+HfjaGTII1wZTCOLKk2sNajlQsv3I2zePYnbF2snutXIVXqw9rRoBavAgVbuNCEDQHtrHUHGLay7P5P8ltNLn+IWXfWaaAYgPil84OwpgoScPCmYgOGkGvfRgbM97GefPGa65GiVz4eloJw1mxHDw/wI9GKGPesNWpk6BNG7hfgKGZj1olpQI91nJiZGGLVFhvHtLfzNK+x7S2poPL5a/ic9Eepp6O7xtfRvqGmRD4gXhEa4XeBpxmrUvgF2JxPqsDfu/n+k+KBKefEHoFsChyojDygnz6kVzWhT5xdVKIMX3PyKaOCDpdk6Smhw+Gv1Xwq/uD/yE3eIgeQ73UsZbErRhnV0W5lA+Fyw/rjpQpugGM8lMpfM68ZUmZok+CjoJ8tH2MiO8gpEzS5pcZMc1WKmE9eXT1DoARYBQ3pLGBFbi/c0W0jckDYY7EQdE5RCEXau4dyWtf7ffq8bmAaerIc7ZHQz/SrZ3uMrn7hFQ/jFBksNdCH4xG7sDIWifO/BbNutY4xEroOo9aSuGyJmjCUcvCYTuNyEUy9Rrqb3a9MLrvRy3MK8sPPlwHD4SMGe8pn+LEfuA5BZGrHi27+4XvbUUY7MRFcfJyc019pgGQ7OLBos6SqInjjlME/Xq9S2QjfaEswRuQFOgnWyES6iRlecP2b8itb92BelCJOONlNsJzJp3UtqffVLpl383zhz8Y1DKXkBeG9aKA/KK7+7Shty29g3lGxuQ9s5Sjp0nhBcMnL9D7HzIqaFA+x84Oy+ZoCVkUVFc3rgFor1VcjB9Fez1aqq6MQ/HCReXBB1a5wOVqS74GGkYo9p6lCzb1/6jubaIeQCTH+8HVC4Cx/LV8acu4ZreMO8gILYqn1cNd1E6GS7D7qV5MBWnusxNXtKZKcKszS3q5pN4SimYtC8JUKIBUku8npfUxyIL4YXKXkUGVPfXaasdvX4H9Dh6wZsJUxh0Yo3BSRuciehE8tGs2jI8RLmaD9foyuDYJsci2HqweH87rB1/pjohvmHrsLp/ZsE6OxjRTPr5R3K3hrlAARpjnrwY9xKBp8Il86OmAvfuwXRjputSmgWvXiGIOY0EAeM5k6LdNhop2c1azH2SlLo/13tCFEZpXqVqicPV+6kVrirZ+IWSwrd+5DAhtwm93Le2JBzJI5tPBSzofSZ67eJcRO0yu8GpYA6AyIeZTIK7m1a5ps5eUmADhVNpIoq/CtMhQbXlP8eAx5nTjKxUDF99ucx/rIegOCARFS2prqT4k6dr9jHz9oZekagA/XuodUxPPrcB1Rg3bVl7ncfAjkPAtT5nj+u+W15mPCOmA9+bSPDxiMuKy54+pWnXvZnq+me0x3vLj2Amgf2sVNdBeh4a/c1YkuL8uMiKYHdpYU/3/dUTvG1PjPtiODRftH631m6C6BifaeCNxenLRU27LaRqnvMw6TGTjNo/hOv75FE0b45Ny2L0ZEy1MZLoy5vFQDhqxu9WDHLDKmX7CcPipoLfjl/7EKqFHd5nK/HjgGJrhtii7nv6+ZBFlfZx3+dUoLxI0FPVI25xoEfLTxU1CB7nKo6m8tU7QuPpAhdiGcEDYbBdgVsEwBlxlBOdh2rBGEIXWoYbPC/o5OQKGBCW74IIwcirIElCfSIPRB7bTxIE2buZZ3QzlLeLNaj+0ZUBIphcJityOKaB8RggpxT559n8Imf6OASxklc9nhxPMOw7IvS/73ABOlMKCxHEcQu+AryzEOV6/BljFkUrz7mP4aT4D0qmAzfpfMh3n3wx4Ov5gY6pHdLza5ezAmOzN8ZRD/O0uFjwUA3TnpcBZFwKV7May83RWaiETKZC4aTfzOCy18EavMZLx4j8XfjA6/ks/KYGU8hUutxfRcEf0F/gEuPfP+RSOppgtSnSOdWiqcwkrZFCoggs3hgD/bsXGL8Xm0glRd9CXZT/l84ClgFPjwMsei3fyh0LRLfOMPcIinIKRvR8b7UCXjw10cGgErACshRGFzK68ficOu6cHs179i7Flm62A2JYSy+7lKfCESiRn4npR8J7BzbGoa1m0EZgbNPfTFvkwWEGLShETSwUOL4010jZD1kqolteAawGnMV1uadL5d4omXWWiSqtBYQlfMdfvsMypgIv58CyWV5NWYS3kTIGI6VBygt9Po19aSv1ikZdxC1Ghactf+Bs7ZqITChYo9sFkdBO3phqR4yVWfEKDcEGjtqhutfUxJsMbxOm2btCegb+86lTFg9ij9W2ZPY7QlWktVk9/mwDSS19e55TcUcRvluOtCotxtXqu3/LL7h34kKG/VQnmnhbejT1wD70GCAMpbt1AXJAMy+kX+lybcSAI5wRX6J4zQHMwt0S2u+KjzLK37y0AZ6hUNu5OfPoua4CBX7B80Gn8OaNHXySCg5ucZS3zkN/wHbp2zEYkfJq9LmZ2ywOqDc2EC1S3hRTZPeJzXU46ez9VGDYfCXjTOY7Xa5rA0Hl5XTOc7NSYV7JyUx/e+ZYeXySYOhffw8w6hAnBkPxjK2tjqb+2MnQhAfOSk0ncQU5HLQ6f+jAmJ6Qo99tvKK4Vy1dRpmeA+1L/o2pdd5ItajW1hwA039bGvoLslMLNlkmeFe8gDbwOCkotqDC2Hpjx5Rtku0MQnOGqMSlIDfNKZhnkD1CcnO1eFRbfcnfaAyyB6LSskHpEh3tZpLIUbM+XSXwrY2qOn6P99ywNIljtGTmx23N63EFcddJlTqp71lxfjHajMBh9dEax3mBLhXmLWfz3DrFAtbnx1wr6Qkg87KCU1MZtN2Xup7IuEgjaW9wlWwfwDiFhC9LL8GayolsNUwv9MZfIz0glaCJaegwHCIvPykTadsruMi85/ouKW6LFuT8PsqY+6p4EIaIZ1CeDwlo6at9tLXXpd2SyE8gX4cVlQG5drHgMPCierwUlMkRdP5tgRNuDHvoCc4QTZqHi/Hm8HXV7AXEQJrxKwgK4ZTQA8xkhOtQcmlDk9AouTicza5SJpQc84oOkDcAhZ4WkhmA8v6K2eOcJIFwquoeWT33pN8HZG61n7aED3SiwqCEBn+gej2K6GKg4nm/d4Q+rBM6CITvZdGaZOUqK6WVxdsThmFuOAWoy1f5S2GJVD6ZpFgDMdFCufpFfQs9vKv9r+wpSFeThf0zQb0a3QvrGGxGIPapK7vWIwBXYwwCgyPdmAgg13yO0O2zq+h6rRPWLf1j+9JM+XDk6Uzzzn8kQ3DhtbWzglgnijZ24AZ4wH0gZtimdfbF6mUYRcN8LOaBYMOtKVlP9ffvR7VzLrIIZMV7itBZGgpcaF840BSj6x/Rw2k8fd9hLoW/Nf8hgB" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "**Defect: Missing output arc from RecordRejection to AvailableReviewer**\n\n**Evidence:**\n\nOperational account specifies: \"becomes available again when either **approval or rejection** is recorded.\"\n\nTarget description specifies: \"RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has **no output arc returning the reviewer token**.\"\n\nWhen RecordRejection fires in the proposed net, it removes the token from CheckInProgress but does not produce a token in AvailableReviewer. This leaves the reviewer unavailable permanently in the rejection case, violating the operational requirement that the reviewer must be available again in both outcomes (approval and rejection).\n\nThe formalism-specific defect is the absence of an output arc: RecordRejection → AvailableReviewer." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2538, + "output": 798, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3336, + "cost": { + "input": 0.002538, + "output": 0.0039900000000000005, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.006528000000000001 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 617 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284254125, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8G9cwX8u2dJmRa4cpN", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RDX3NP5AT9PVCEB1C5A5", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RDWXSNDPAJS3GRE87ACC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:42.104Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0RDX3NP5AT9PVCEB1C5A5", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to review an operational account against a target SDCPN description. Let me understand what they're asking:\n\n1. Operational account: describes what should happen\n - Each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start\n - The reviewer is unavailable during the check\n - The reviewer becomes available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded\n\n2. Target description: describes a proposed SDCPN design\n - AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck\n - CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n - RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer\n - RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nNow I need to identify a formalism-specific defect. Let me think about what the SDCPN semantics would be:\n\nIn a Petri net:\n- Places hold tokens\n- Transitions fire (move tokens based on input and output arcs)\n- An arc from a place to a transition means the transition consumes a token from that place\n- An arc from a transition to a place means the transition produces a token in that place\n\nLooking at the operational account: \"becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded\"\n\nLooking at the target description:\n- RecordApproval returns the token to AvailableReviewer ✓ (covers approval case)\n- RecordRejection has no output arc returning the reviewer token ✗ (does not cover rejection case)\n\nThis is a defect! When RecordRejection fires, it consumes the token from CheckInProgress but doesn't return the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer. This violates the operational account which states the reviewer should become available again when rejection is recorded.\n\nThe evidence is clear:\n- Operational requirement: reviewer must be returned in both approval AND rejection cases\n- Target design: RecordRejection explicitly has \"no output arc returning the reviewer token\"\n- This causes the reviewer to become permanently unavailable after a rejection outcome, contradicting the stated reuse requirement.\n\nSo the formalism-specific defect is: a missing output arc from RecordRejection back to AvailableReviewer.\n\nGiven the instruction to stop after the first defect and its evidence, without interviewing or mutating, I'll present just this finding and stop there — no skill invocation, no follow-up questions, no net changes.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "**Defect: Missing output arc from RecordRejection to AvailableReviewer**\n\n**Evidence:**\n\nOperational account specifies: \"becomes available again when either **approval or rejection** is recorded.\"\n\nTarget description specifies: \"RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has **no output arc returning the reviewer token**.\"\n\nWhen RecordRejection fires in the proposed net, it removes the token from CheckInProgress but does not produce a token in AvailableReviewer. This leaves the reviewer unavailable permanently in the rejection case, violating the operational requirement that the reviewer must be available again in both outcomes (approval and rejection).\n\nThe formalism-specific defect is the absence of an output arc: RecordRejection → AvailableReviewer." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2538, + "output": 798, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3336, + "cost": { + "input": 0.002538, + "output": 0.0039900000000000005, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.006528000000000001 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 617 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284254125, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8G9cwX8u2dJmRa4cpN", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RDWXSNDPAJS3GRE87ACC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:42.104Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to review an operational account against a target SDCPN description. Let me understand what they're asking:\n\n1. Operational account: describes what should happen\n - Each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start\n - The reviewer is unavailable during the check\n - The reviewer becomes available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded\n\n2. Target description: describes a proposed SDCPN design\n - AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck\n - CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n - RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer\n - RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nNow I need to identify a formalism-specific defect. Let me think about what the SDCPN semantics would be:\n\nIn a Petri net:\n- Places hold tokens\n- Transitions fire (move tokens based on input and output arcs)\n- An arc from a place to a transition means the transition consumes a token from that place\n- An arc from a transition to a place means the transition produces a token in that place\n\nLooking at the operational account: \"becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded\"\n\nLooking at the target description:\n- RecordApproval returns the token to AvailableReviewer ✓ (covers approval case)\n- RecordRejection has no output arc returning the reviewer token ✗ (does not cover rejection case)\n\nThis is a defect! When RecordRejection fires, it consumes the token from CheckInProgress but doesn't return the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer. This violates the operational account which states the reviewer should become available again when rejection is recorded.\n\nThe evidence is clear:\n- Operational requirement: reviewer must be returned in both approval AND rejection cases\n- Target design: RecordRejection explicitly has \"no output arc returning the reviewer token\"\n- This causes the reviewer to become permanently unavailable after a rejection outcome, contradicting the stated reuse requirement.\n\nSo the formalism-specific defect is: a missing output arc from RecordRejection back to AvailableReviewer.\n\nGiven the instruction to stop after the first defect and its evidence, without interviewing or mutating, I'll present just this finding and stop there — no skill invocation, no follow-up questions, no net changes.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "**Defect: Missing output arc from RecordRejection to AvailableReviewer**\n\n**Evidence:**\n\nOperational account specifies: \"becomes available again when either **approval or rejection** is recorded.\"\n\nTarget description specifies: \"RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has **no output arc returning the reviewer token**.\"\n\nWhen RecordRejection fires in the proposed net, it removes the token from CheckInProgress but does not produce a token in AvailableReviewer. This leaves the reviewer unavailable permanently in the rejection case, violating the operational requirement that the reviewer must be available again in both outcomes (approval and rejection).\n\nThe formalism-specific defect is the absence of an output arc: RecordRejection → AvailableReviewer." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2538, + "output": 798, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3336, + "cost": { + "input": 0.002538, + "output": 0.0039900000000000005, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.006528000000000001 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 617 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284254125, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8G9cwX8u2dJmRa4cpN", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RDWXSNDPAJS3GRE87ACC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:42.105Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RDWXSNDPAJS3GRE87ACC", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 7997, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:42.106Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0RDW7EDGP3Z919Q5F7X10", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0RDWXSNDPAJS3GRE87ACC", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:42.106Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0RDW4T6F87TFZ9H55Z2SE", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "93af8a74eee73496b9da28099882810e06db258fef5228a14f64aa675743f643", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:37:42.106Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "d2d42344c40ddeb2471eeeba437032079bd2c7083afdbc2f9de5e823f841d5b8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "ebec2ac5faab6cbbbe26eeeebc2d7ac0ba7dc637fd43ea9b5917f8e0277f5515", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "c7cb5b2222b0d1b5aff861c4056f41ba8825aca284ec774d8e4f0fbf12807314", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "321f8405c12374315d61caf466001d6b4b5cf68b04325df77a7948daaa680de1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/scenarios.json": "1844df940b8de9d10d28e9537f966920aba581b36956a9ac26a3767824ca96cb", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/protocol.md": "ef1443bb02c6c26d4ded6edf9e023579bc32cdc394f90490edfb34eaf32b8ed2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md": "8cd2749c8292f01045ab4282fc7248c07046cecaf14a586a9ef286e2876cf8bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md": "82b035268c07cc8ee4736b5ffdd392c8f153793d2ca6b9ed57271c9b6146de10", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md": "8826b85d32d6c24fbc8f678ec394600676ec61c4a0b83d0a9cfa16be87fc5d76", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "1a2417cc5f9649d459c5efbc87cd3242db99a9717622a6d86073c72835818865" + }, + "promptSelection": { + "candidateCorePromptIncluded": true, + "v3SdcpnAppendIncluded": true, + "legacyCorePromptIncluded": false, + "legacyRoleMarkerIncluded": false, + "initialSystemPromptSha256": "ad472c3919f1857f1f5f02f83bf0adb83c4795808e44f2b58813b158585b61f7" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "candidateCorePrompt": "6a458c0bbbc9dee5b4454a54b032818227ab681ba9f7beaa60d4fe9628f6eb41", + "v3SdcpnAppend": "73cac46487d33051a90cc487ea7abfc11fec4b049af11a108396ec08d44569fb", + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S3-packaged-r2.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S3-packaged-r2.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c188ddc20b4 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S3-packaged-r2.json @@ -0,0 +1,3147 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v3-packaged-s3-7982bf3c", + "phase": "paid", + "instrumentVersion": "v3", + "candidate": "packaged", + "scenarioId": "S3", + "scenario": { + "title": "Review with a resolvable target defect", + "prompt": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token.", + "stopAfter": "The first supported defect finding.", + "expected": "Identify the missing reviewer return on rejection without loading universal elicitation." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "**First supported formalism-specific defect:**\n\n**Asymmetric reviewer token return on failure paths.**\n\nThe operational account requires the reviewer to become available again when **either** approval or rejection is recorded. However, the target description shows:\n- **RecordApproval** returns the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer (supports the requirement), but\n- **RecordRejection** consumes the CheckInProgress token with **no output arc** returning the reviewer token.\n\n**Evidence:**\n\nIn the Petri net formalism, tokens represent reusable resources and must flow out of a transition via output arcs to be restored. The missing output arc from RecordRejection means the reviewer token is consumed (removed from the net) and never reaches AvailableReviewer. This violates the structural validity principle that \"shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nThe rejection outcome is a valid terminal path in the operational account but is not a recovery or destruction path—it is equivalent in status to approval and must release the resource identically.", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "activatedSkills": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "toolCalls": [ + { + "toolCallId": "toolu_01MHtk2zZHcKJChuXoYedAqj", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "toolCallId": "toolu_01KzYJTbLcU3iV8m56k3CZAk", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + }, + "output": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "readOutputs": [ + { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md", + "sha256": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5" + } + ], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 4481, + "inputTokens": 2538, + "outputTokens": 513, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 3051, + "cost": 0.005103 + }, + { + "durationMs": 3956, + "inputTokens": 12, + "outputTokens": 313, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 4223, + "totalTokens": 4548, + "cost": 0.00685575 + }, + { + "durationMs": 8677, + "inputTokens": 13, + "outputTokens": 709, + "cacheReadTokens": 4223, + "cacheWriteTokens": 1385, + "totalTokens": 6330, + "cost": 0.005711550000000001 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 17114, + "inputTokens": 2563, + "outputTokens": 1535, + "cacheReadTokens": 4223, + "cacheWriteTokens": 5608, + "totalTokens": 13929, + "cost": 0.0176703 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nReview the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token.\n\n## Assistant\n**First supported formalism-specific defect:**\n\n**Asymmetric reviewer token return on failure paths.**\n\nThe operational account requires the reviewer to become available again when **either** approval or rejection is recorded. However, the target description shows:\n- **RecordApproval** returns the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer (supports the requirement), but\n- **RecordRejection** consumes the CheckInProgress token with **no output arc** returning the reviewer token.\n\n**Evidence:**\n\nIn the Petri net formalism, tokens represent reusable resources and must flow out of a transition via output arcs to be restored. The missing output arc from RecordRejection means the reviewer token is consumed (removed from the net) and never reaches AvailableReviewer. This violates the structural validity principle that \"shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nThe rejection outcome is a valid terminal path in the operational account but is not a recovery or destruction path—it is equivalent in status to approval and must release the resource identically.\n- tool activate_skill (toolu_01MHtk2zZHcKJChuXoYedAqj): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\\n\\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\\n\\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\\n\\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\\n\\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (toolu_01KzYJTbLcU3iV8m56k3CZAk): \"# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\\n\\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\\n\\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\\n\\n## Before construction\\n\\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\\n\\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\\n\\n## During construction\\n\\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\\n\\n## Structural validity\\n\\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\\n\\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\\n\\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\\n\\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\\n\\n## Existing-net revision\\n\\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\\n\\n## Delivery\\n\\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\\n\\nState plainly:\\n\\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\\n\\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\\n\"", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000039", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFGMFNUNEFaWENTNjJFSDQzNkdLN1Mx", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1F0SV10MCBK9WW7S2RPJ9DZ", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The user is asking me to review an operational account against a target description (which appears to be a Petri net formalism description) and identify any formalism-specific defects.\n\nLet me break down what I'm being asked:\n1. Operational account: describes the intended behavior\n2. Target description: describes how a Petri net should implement it\n3. Task: stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence\n4. Do not interview, do not mutate a net\n\nI should activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first, as this is about operational process modeling and analyzing whether a Petri net design matches the operational intent.\n\nThe operational account says:\n- Each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start\n- The reviewer is unavailable during the check\n- The reviewer becomes available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded\n\nThe target description says:\n- AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n- RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nThe defect is clear: according to the operational account, the reviewer should become available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded. However, the target description shows that RecordApproval returns the token to AvailableReviewer, but RecordRejection does NOT return the token. This means after rejection, the reviewer token is lost/consumed and never becomes available again, violating the operational requirement that \"becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nThis is a formalism-specific defect because:\n- In Petri net terms, tokens represent resources\n- The missing output arc from RecordRejection means the reviewer token is consumed and never returned\n- This breaks the symmetry required by the operational account where both approval and rejection should restore the reviewer's availability\n\nLet me activate the skill and then provide this analysis.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01MHtk2zZHcKJChuXoYedAqj", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n", + "durationMs": 3 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I've been asked to review the described target against the operational account and stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. The user specifically said not to interview or mutate a net.\n\nThis is a \"construct-only execution\" branch—the user has supplied a workpiece (operational account) and a target (Petri net description) and wants me to check whether the target correctly implements the account.\n\nAccording to the skill instructions for construct-only execution: \"Use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools.\"\n\nHowever, in this case, the user is asking me to review/check an existing target description against the operational account, not to construct a net. So I should use the checks.md guidance to identify defects.\n\nLet me read the checks.md resource to understand what formalism-specific defects I should look for.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01KzYJTbLcU3iV8m56k3CZAk", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + }, + "output": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n", + "durationMs": 0 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good, I have the checks guidance. Now I can evaluate the target description against the operational account. The key check that applies here is \"Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nLooking at the operational account and target description:\n\nOperational account says:\n- Each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start\n- The reviewer is unavailable during the check\n- The reviewer becomes available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded\n\nTarget description says:\n- AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n- RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nThe formalism-specific defect is clear:\n\nIn the Petri net formalism, tokens represent resources. The operational account requires that the reviewer token be returned to the AvailableReviewer place when either approval OR rejection is recorded. However, the target description shows:\n- RecordApproval DOES return the token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection DOES NOT return the token (it consumes the CheckInProgress token but produces no output)\n\nThis violates the structural validity check: \"Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nThe rejection path is a failure/alternative outcome path, and the resource (reviewer token) must return in both the approval and rejection cases, but in the target it only returns in the approval case.\n\nThis is a formalism-specific defect because:\n1. It's specific to how Petri nets represent resource flow through arcs and token consumption/production\n2. The evidence is the missing output arc from RecordRejection back to AvailableReviewer\n3. This is distinct from operational ambiguity—the operational account is clear that both paths should restore availability", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "**First supported formalism-specific defect:**\n\n**Asymmetric reviewer token return on failure paths.**\n\nThe operational account requires the reviewer to become available again when **either** approval or rejection is recorded. However, the target description shows:\n- **RecordApproval** returns the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer (supports the requirement), but\n- **RecordRejection** consumes the CheckInProgress token with **no output arc** returning the reviewer token.\n\n**Evidence:**\n\nIn the Petri net formalism, tokens represent reusable resources and must flow out of a transition via output arcs to be restored. The missing output arc from RecordRejection means the reviewer token is consumed (removed from the net) and never reaches AvailableReviewer. This violates the structural validity principle that \"shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nThe rejection outcome is a valid terminal path in the operational account but is not a recovery or destruction path—it is equivalent in status to approval and must release the resource identically.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1F0ST4B6T4N4HR8R7WTW8ZS" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:19.405Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:19.408Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:19.429Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:19.434Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:19.434Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:19.435Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284299446 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:20.321Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:20.323Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "The", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:21.328Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " user is", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:21.328Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " asking me to review an", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:21.328Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " operational account against", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:21.328Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " a target description (", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:21.328Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "which", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:21.328Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " appears", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:21.328Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " to be a", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:21.328Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " Petri", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:21.328Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " net formalism description", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:21.328Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ") and identify any formalism-specific defects.\n\nLet me break down what I'm being asked:\n1. Operational account: describes the intended behavior", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:21.328Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "\n2. Target description: describes how a Petri net should implement it\n3. Task: stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence\n4. Do not interview, do not mutate a net\n\nI should activate", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:21.328Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " the sdcpn-modelling skill first, as this is about operational process modeling and analyzing whether a Petri net design matches the operational intent.\n\nThe operational", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:22.525Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " account says:\n- Each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start\n- The reviewer is unavailable during the check\n- The reviewer becomes available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded\n\nThe target description says:\n- AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n- Record", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:22.525Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "Approval returns that token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nThe defect is clear: according to the operational account, the reviewer should become available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded. However, the", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:22.525Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " target description shows that RecordApproval returns the token to AvailableReviewer, but RecordRejection does NOT return the token. This means after rejection, the reviewer token is lost/", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:23.565Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "consumed and never becomes available again, violating the operational requirement that \"becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nThis is a form", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:23.565Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "alism-specific defect because:\n- In Petri net terms, tokens represent resources\n- The missing output arc from RecordRejection means the reviewer", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:23.565Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " token is consumed and never returned\n- This breaks the symmetry required by the operational account where both approval and rejection should restore the reviewer's availability\n\nLet me activate", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:23.891Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " the skill and then provide this analysis.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:23.891Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "The user is asking me to review an operational account against a target description (which appears to be a Petri net formalism description) and identify any formalism-specific defects.\n\nLet me break down what I'm being asked:\n1. Operational account: describes the intended behavior\n2. Target description: describes how a Petri net should implement it\n3. Task: stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence\n4. Do not interview, do not mutate a net\n\nI should activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first, as this is about operational process modeling and analyzing whether a Petri net design matches the operational intent.\n\nThe operational account says:\n- Each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start\n- The reviewer is unavailable during the check\n- The reviewer becomes available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded\n\nThe target description says:\n- AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n- RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nThe defect is clear: according to the operational account, the reviewer should become available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded. However, the target description shows that RecordApproval returns the token to AvailableReviewer, but RecordRejection does NOT return the token. This means after rejection, the reviewer token is lost/consumed and never becomes available again, violating the operational requirement that \"becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nThis is a formalism-specific defect because:\n- In Petri net terms, tokens represent resources\n- The missing output arc from RecordRejection means the reviewer token is consumed and never returned\n- This breaks the symmetry required by the operational account where both approval and rejection should restore the reviewer's availability\n\nLet me activate the skill and then provide this analysis.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:23.892Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01MHtk2zZHcKJChuXoYedAqj", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:23.893Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01MHtk2zZHcKJChuXoYedAqj", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"name\": \"sdcpn-modelling", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:23.893Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01MHtk2zZHcKJChuXoYedAqj", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:23.893Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 4481, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8KVVraMskf5RY2BFZq", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to review an operational account against a target description (which appears to be a Petri net formalism description) and identify any formalism-specific defects.\n\nLet me break down what I'm being asked:\n1. Operational account: describes the intended behavior\n2. Target description: describes how a Petri net should implement it\n3. Task: stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence\n4. Do not interview, do not mutate a net\n\nI should activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first, as this is about operational process modeling and analyzing whether a Petri net design matches the operational intent.\n\nThe operational account says:\n- Each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start\n- The reviewer is unavailable during the check\n- The reviewer becomes available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded\n\nThe target description says:\n- AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n- RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nThe defect is clear: according to the operational account, the reviewer should become available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded. However, the target description shows that RecordApproval returns the token to AvailableReviewer, but RecordRejection does NOT return the token. This means after rejection, the reviewer token is lost/consumed and never becomes available again, violating the operational requirement that \"becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nThis is a formalism-specific defect because:\n- In Petri net terms, tokens represent resources\n- The missing output arc from RecordRejection means the reviewer token is consumed and never returned\n- This breaks the symmetry required by the operational account where both approval and rejection should restore the reviewer's availability\n\nLet me activate the skill and then provide this analysis.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01MHtk2zZHcKJChuXoYedAqj", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2538, + "output": 513, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3051, + "cost": { + "input": 0.002538, + "output": 0.002565, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005103 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:23.916Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to review an operational account against a target description (which appears to be a Petri net formalism description) and identify any formalism-specific defects.\n\nLet me break down what I'm being asked:\n1. Operational account: describes the intended behavior\n2. Target description: describes how a Petri net should implement it\n3. Task: stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence\n4. Do not interview, do not mutate a net\n\nI should activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first, as this is about operational process modeling and analyzing whether a Petri net design matches the operational intent.\n\nThe operational account says:\n- Each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start\n- The reviewer is unavailable during the check\n- The reviewer becomes available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded\n\nThe target description says:\n- AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n- RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nThe defect is clear: according to the operational account, the reviewer should become available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded. However, the target description shows that RecordApproval returns the token to AvailableReviewer, but RecordRejection does NOT return the token. This means after rejection, the reviewer token is lost/consumed and never becomes available again, violating the operational requirement that \"becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nThis is a formalism-specific defect because:\n- In Petri net terms, tokens represent resources\n- The missing output arc from RecordRejection means the reviewer token is consumed and never returned\n- This breaks the symmetry required by the operational account where both approval and rejection should restore the reviewer's availability\n\nLet me activate the skill and then provide this analysis.", + "thinkingSignature": "ErESCpoBCBEYAipAra9o2KC12XWgjoq54JWcYf3SsV4WzM8uBQuk3AfHC0eUpcOcOElMA8ODVFxN7OwmTDMqFVOy+1vblDjxUzehjzIZY2xhdWRlLWhhaWt1LTQtNS0yMDI1MTAwMTgAQgh0aGlua2luZ1okMWNiODRmYzQtNDdhYS00ZTFmLWE2NjUtOTQwYWI5ZjgxZjg4qAGPm9zUBhIMTU0Z27ngY497XCQfGgzFgnL02VPgTvAXMLsiMLSfVd531AsosWxQGYD5VNFZzCPo+QvQHKYdt31tclx1PqMVFJN9D6JqSVcKCnXs5yrDEG3jSRfUCwC+nTDJQXTmjWuPfxy5d6qnwD+oKLGLS+EhrVu3XcKxtcvBCWbiQPjA+aMaqwqvX2E/dhrf8PodQ+Fbwb5z5IOLNxBF2m2begVpZtO221Ez6Q1WvMVV7h14fRiVPLNbieDDYK5UabHdgg2Kox1eArS09r54gayS4tdsRnXgVpO8HkxIDmEed2hLbg1Hs9SrPsWxQYoCgCLwv1GYLxezr50enhxLPAiAUJO9ilT8rT0SdwYDVfggNixIhKBe7Lr1PWctY0tTZh7Pia3F8+rH2QRcWOER69MU7DFQfYJJ3gXoUnwRQJ2i5Wb+/0z/R+0zIJhCEqMwpufUHg6TfEOLz3f5/9KaPuIFVbyg0xPsB0MaxBBzSYT4gWaVzLJMp47Ou+f0osVeMUxPQQ43C8ICy2UEnPzoPVLgdY1NABd/cS+OMHmuxk0abfiWx/CxS47dFpBz2mFSf018mmjPASQC76LLL+XKrg7lyIvxTAg2oHW9ir/zf3FyVpW7ESMCWfkyUjphO2g8CxICLDjVQWHOucIP0QmlM8Wp1Z1w8QRZ9LG1PpvNJldB4Mn09ZJnvFbYWN0fNWO2KaPGAUc/RAYiUj4s5/5KUwHV7ZB5xKQm+NgrrF15IFNQvQECD2mBd5pP8yTD4umhtoNOUEC7P+v+CZnYRta50rkiLW0wHHb8kyKrEQCMuvvDXfNg1Dfm1ZcaarJ4PJj+NWkzXP2MD28eDvTLWwttZwTKms+SvDdvf/lIQDVfdtV1T82lDHgKRdzoNPJoi46hWIgzLbINiJ6iD8yjszaQbqDs6Y4SRm7u0RGjO9asWDixQvhLPFSHDhb+G17XcRftmpkBNKmIu70ValPeDnb3BolrqYgj/hOlJF7y+xrFFC/HCfaR1++xEXGJWWjduMhie6s1Ntb9bcjIAS9zzfOmyO/AcjnxYX4l6Ue7C/4lpJPiiRKHqBpNKXcyPrF29Rmq5/Eq2ypVGouD0Cr0csGr+bAKRr15O8pMzJKyqYsAJ3geLCNiSiEG5jd+ntOwn9vPfyN4EL/CwJXPJlWZHA9dB4SxjrxZlKINKepZD7J0xnq4jr1fzJeMGq0eFNuwKwe8pKbpPrJTO1sCQt6Bvzcx9CSTC2TEFWzjWEmIgBuYiVgLm7VLk4uyseCQoxGUwUFTvrw9oswxQo0CnWr2z963B/XBRyWcGp5Esd+zXRFnGFM6C3AZ0ohzUkJ5erFKWMCcAsU5Tkq9diRgcWXJE07wwBWToFX73NkPbz9To6dtw67S1AK7WZ7evAgOa66NrEL+ulyDssRswco+RqtCC1IwbcKVg2ct2DpYKCSgotgsJITpUa5u97n9d9nsvLBGgNqDhOxxDKuy5X3+3lX/DKoXEUTpjILJsu3QO9feW/y46KqGKtGa3hePMjgkyP2xon/3gwE7SY6qyADjRhmLJqeAu2kM/kX4YFIj5DIPm+21oj1JEYT11fDoBrddZcNN29r4O8djYIQqzVds9p2gVBa3FLkp3I5aRZh1mlCvvayxeGZvqfcFLhog4dGSDjFhLizZ6CvIRNGHZ7LcUhokdP+KyXLNO4ygpSwkzh8eByFIkiCefMaDdh/82+WwB4o/SX9BdK2jmwpXF6rIJUJ0LVrwcFSOQXD0o8bDe8Xn1aOG0+nCpUywX9Rue96//9cpYKgZo2TrF+oXHBnfYkCWCEJMJTQsCb9XyggVD3nML68/VyUAlkLZ6Ldd2IzA8/uOpAPyPGSUTOR03hL45Sj3zVIjq7EJvGQOo1Xg9l98SjUkHPJLNpDfP+HjWxRL1FnsDMkuXBKHao/ru1uSEPBvyDN3F0tLiM0Vol5Q4gLOiqZKDavuoXy46YuYNG21lc+qH7eRzR5jhkejvHSA1ry0o4zS42ls0Qx9nkxWdnxlaF/9meYumIGn+dCRlCTUSvdb0//sn0f9oV/tjd/ImbJBTo7LDQX7deYTpfjVHVCtGcUU0pcecsmSlO9Jfio2NgN+R+AoidfjaxMuW/TPNNpT01Vwhixs7j+O0RoJM7svDggQbu/ynAc2t0qnUNrNaPFXeJh4wfAqRrdGCUY+fodPIR1wwwT6kSG7UD4ocNCDKtXRpNkzlifGnnIfTAGv02Zcf/SMK7iGiHsRxFKaBnUk9RAtNYxrwusKkzA76yUta/huggE0zu4sWuzai9CTLElabch9GFbn5rUxa1Z++9yd4uBwd2ShTl4IgPTYw2+RkigAhLtOZJvDBvKNM08ZbGlkjjqR8IOJSImIo05WnVXU1ris5omcBgTfJITF/Yv9D70O5MKhMPk6FCdGz/+dm63rHJUrk1Fl6+4Fmn/LWTjULaCJK/1vcr0WNR/treJxGWDJ8n3w4ysNyMcGbgVxciKCITeiZBBFyCDz0sgW5bWYJQ9dpBcgVg7reXIGgDvXnwSEPspsCF+1X5VF4yH7JvSWPWSbQx6iLC8g7WqLKz4GRohTAWODtvJn+yLZFTUc4UBcGOtZTp56nHiElBHmfRk3wUaLRkl5SlVtEyxJwalhqlWeSuakxQ2A6DnC3XiglE5gP2DE0mzMd8W7M9ArnQJeLUEWzach69oUe5fcCszw44jpHZGCG6Ct7RqywnA7WPwUhvi4D52RPCBtrtVDWwBlgjqp/QpTNdqVMG1tXh53JSxGgOSlBLzm/wZ9szs3pGaf0rjvJIw3sMTk46DR2yBDNoSYFPALpVVpJW/HpCUy72H63tIj2X6W0QjGsgaW4yq/iXR4noLRA1RXRDLd+Uta8PEI+Ygo8yNCSXorwYF6/Qt6YShhLuDzSpxfBKO0bqdmggyVTcrftuXaQRgB" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01MHtk2zZHcKJChuXoYedAqj", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2538, + "output": 513, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3051, + "cost": { + "input": 0.002538, + "output": 0.002565, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005103 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 451 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284299446, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8KVVraMskf5RY2BFZq", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:23.917Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01MHtk2zZHcKJChuXoYedAqj", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:23.918Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "args": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01MHtk2zZHcKJChuXoYedAqj", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284303921 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:23.921Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01MHtk2zZHcKJChuXoYedAqj", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284303921 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:23.921Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01MHtk2zZHcKJChuXoYedAqj", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + }, + "durationMs": 3, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:23.921Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "effectiveResult": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0ST5AB3FGPJ63884WD9N7", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to review an operational account against a target description (which appears to be a Petri net formalism description) and identify any formalism-specific defects.\n\nLet me break down what I'm being asked:\n1. Operational account: describes the intended behavior\n2. Target description: describes how a Petri net should implement it\n3. Task: stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence\n4. Do not interview, do not mutate a net\n\nI should activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first, as this is about operational process modeling and analyzing whether a Petri net design matches the operational intent.\n\nThe operational account says:\n- Each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start\n- The reviewer is unavailable during the check\n- The reviewer becomes available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded\n\nThe target description says:\n- AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n- RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nThe defect is clear: according to the operational account, the reviewer should become available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded. However, the target description shows that RecordApproval returns the token to AvailableReviewer, but RecordRejection does NOT return the token. This means after rejection, the reviewer token is lost/consumed and never becomes available again, violating the operational requirement that \"becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nThis is a formalism-specific defect because:\n- In Petri net terms, tokens represent resources\n- The missing output arc from RecordRejection means the reviewer token is consumed and never returned\n- This breaks the symmetry required by the operational account where both approval and rejection should restore the reviewer's availability\n\nLet me activate the skill and then provide this analysis.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01MHtk2zZHcKJChuXoYedAqj", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2538, + "output": 513, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3051, + "cost": { + "input": 0.002538, + "output": 0.002565, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005103 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 451 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284299446, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8KVVraMskf5RY2BFZq", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01MHtk2zZHcKJChuXoYedAqj", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284303921 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:23.922Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SYHJVBEGWQ715F2QPKJ1", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:23.922Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SYHJVBEGWQ715F2QPKJ1", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to review an operational account against a target description (which appears to be a Petri net formalism description) and identify any formalism-specific defects.\n\nLet me break down what I'm being asked:\n1. Operational account: describes the intended behavior\n2. Target description: describes how a Petri net should implement it\n3. Task: stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence\n4. Do not interview, do not mutate a net\n\nI should activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first, as this is about operational process modeling and analyzing whether a Petri net design matches the operational intent.\n\nThe operational account says:\n- Each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start\n- The reviewer is unavailable during the check\n- The reviewer becomes available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded\n\nThe target description says:\n- AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n- RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nThe defect is clear: according to the operational account, the reviewer should become available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded. However, the target description shows that RecordApproval returns the token to AvailableReviewer, but RecordRejection does NOT return the token. This means after rejection, the reviewer token is lost/consumed and never becomes available again, violating the operational requirement that \"becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nThis is a formalism-specific defect because:\n- In Petri net terms, tokens represent resources\n- The missing output arc from RecordRejection means the reviewer token is consumed and never returned\n- This breaks the symmetry required by the operational account where both approval and rejection should restore the reviewer's availability\n\nLet me activate the skill and then provide this analysis.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01MHtk2zZHcKJChuXoYedAqj", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01MHtk2zZHcKJChuXoYedAqj", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:23.922Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284303924 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SYHJVBEGWQ715F2QPKJ1", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:24.999Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SYHJVBEGWQ715F2QPKJ1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:25.000Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "Good", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SYHJVBEGWQ715F2QPKJ1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:26.004Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ",", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SYHJVBEGWQ715F2QPKJ1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:26.004Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " the skill", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SYHJVBEGWQ715F2QPKJ1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 44, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:26.004Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " is", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SYHJVBEGWQ715F2QPKJ1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 45, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:26.004Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " activated. Now I've been asked to review the described target against the operational account and stop", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SYHJVBEGWQ715F2QPKJ1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 46, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:26.004Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SYHJVBEGWQ715F2QPKJ1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 47, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:26.004Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " evidence. The user specifically said not to interview or mutate a net.\n\nThis", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SYHJVBEGWQ715F2QPKJ1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 48, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:26.004Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " is a \"construct-only execution\" branch—the user has supplied a workpiece (operational account) and a target (", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SYHJVBEGWQ715F2QPKJ1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 49, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:27.316Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "Petri net description) and wants me to check whether the target correctly implements the account.\n\nAccording to the skill instructions for", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SYHJVBEGWQ715F2QPKJ1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 50, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:27.316Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " construct-only execution: \"Use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools.\"\n\nHowever, in this case, the user is", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SYHJVBEGWQ715F2QPKJ1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 51, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:27.316Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " asking me to review/check an existing target description against the operational account, not to construct a net. So I should use the checks.md guidance to identify def", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SYHJVBEGWQ715F2QPKJ1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 52, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:27.316Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "ects.\n\nLet me read the checks.md resource to understand what formalism-specific defects I should look for.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SYHJVBEGWQ715F2QPKJ1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 53, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:27.584Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I've been asked to review the described target against the operational account and stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. The user specifically said not to interview or mutate a net.\n\nThis is a \"construct-only execution\" branch—the user has supplied a workpiece (operational account) and a target (Petri net description) and wants me to check whether the target correctly implements the account.\n\nAccording to the skill instructions for construct-only execution: \"Use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools.\"\n\nHowever, in this case, the user is asking me to review/check an existing target description against the operational account, not to construct a net. So I should use the checks.md guidance to identify defects.\n\nLet me read the checks.md resource to understand what formalism-specific defects I should look for.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SYHJVBEGWQ715F2QPKJ1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 54, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:27.584Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01KzYJTbLcU3iV8m56k3CZAk", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SYHJVBEGWQ715F2QPKJ1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 55, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:27.586Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01KzYJTbLcU3iV8m56k3CZAk", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "{\"path\": \"/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SYHJVBEGWQ715F2QPKJ1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 56, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:27.877Z" + }, + { + "type": "toolcall_delta", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01KzYJTbLcU3iV8m56k3CZAk", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "argumentTextDelta": "\"}", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SYHJVBEGWQ715F2QPKJ1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 57, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:27.877Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SYHJVBEGWQ715F2QPKJ1", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 3956, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8KprgiGQGghh2ukvTi", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I've been asked to review the described target against the operational account and stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. The user specifically said not to interview or mutate a net.\n\nThis is a \"construct-only execution\" branch—the user has supplied a workpiece (operational account) and a target (Petri net description) and wants me to check whether the target correctly implements the account.\n\nAccording to the skill instructions for construct-only execution: \"Use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools.\"\n\nHowever, in this case, the user is asking me to review/check an existing target description against the operational account, not to construct a net. So I should use the checks.md guidance to identify defects.\n\nLet me read the checks.md resource to understand what formalism-specific defects I should look for.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01KzYJTbLcU3iV8m56k3CZAk", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + } + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 313, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4223, + "totalTokens": 4548, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.0015650000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.00527875, + "total": 0.00685575 + } + }, + "finishReason": "toolUse" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 58, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:27.878Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I've been asked to review the described target against the operational account and stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. The user specifically said not to interview or mutate a net.\n\nThis is a \"construct-only execution\" branch—the user has supplied a workpiece (operational account) and a target (Petri net description) and wants me to check whether the target correctly implements the account.\n\nAccording to the skill instructions for construct-only execution: \"Use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools.\"\n\nHowever, in this case, the user is asking me to review/check an existing target description against the operational account, not to construct a net. So I should use the checks.md guidance to identify defects.\n\nLet me read the checks.md resource to understand what formalism-specific defects I should look for.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01KzYJTbLcU3iV8m56k3CZAk", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 313, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4223, + "totalTokens": 4548, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.0015650000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.00527875, + "total": 0.00685575 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 221 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284303924, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8KprgiGQGghh2ukvTi", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SYHJVBEGWQ715F2QPKJ1", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 59, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:27.878Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool_start", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01KzYJTbLcU3iV8m56k3CZAk", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SYHJVBEGWQ715F2QPKJ1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 60, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:27.879Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "args": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + } + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01KzYJTbLcU3iV8m56k3CZAk", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284307880 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SYHJVBEGWQ715F2QPKJ1", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 61, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:27.880Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01KzYJTbLcU3iV8m56k3CZAk", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284307880 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SYHJVBEGWQ715F2QPKJ1", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 62, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:27.881Z" + }, + { + "type": "tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01KzYJTbLcU3iV8m56k3CZAk", + "isError": false, + "result": { + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + } + }, + "durationMs": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SYHJVBEGWQ715F2QPKJ1", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 63, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:27.882Z", + "origin": "framework", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "effectiveResult": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0SYHJVBEGWQ715F2QPKJ1", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I've been asked to review the described target against the operational account and stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. The user specifically said not to interview or mutate a net.\n\nThis is a \"construct-only execution\" branch—the user has supplied a workpiece (operational account) and a target (Petri net description) and wants me to check whether the target correctly implements the account.\n\nAccording to the skill instructions for construct-only execution: \"Use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools.\"\n\nHowever, in this case, the user is asking me to review/check an existing target description against the operational account, not to construct a net. So I should use the checks.md guidance to identify defects.\n\nLet me read the checks.md resource to understand what formalism-specific defects I should look for.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01KzYJTbLcU3iV8m56k3CZAk", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 313, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4223, + "totalTokens": 4548, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.0015650000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.00527875, + "total": 0.00685575 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 221 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284303924, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8KprgiGQGghh2ukvTi", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + "toolResults": [ + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01KzYJTbLcU3iV8m56k3CZAk", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284307880 + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 64, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:27.882Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0T2DA8GRNMM44THBJ28YG", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 65, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:27.882Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0T2DA8GRNMM44THBJ28YG", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to review an operational account against a target description (which appears to be a Petri net formalism description) and identify any formalism-specific defects.\n\nLet me break down what I'm being asked:\n1. Operational account: describes the intended behavior\n2. Target description: describes how a Petri net should implement it\n3. Task: stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence\n4. Do not interview, do not mutate a net\n\nI should activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first, as this is about operational process modeling and analyzing whether a Petri net design matches the operational intent.\n\nThe operational account says:\n- Each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start\n- The reviewer is unavailable during the check\n- The reviewer becomes available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded\n\nThe target description says:\n- AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n- RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nThe defect is clear: according to the operational account, the reviewer should become available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded. However, the target description shows that RecordApproval returns the token to AvailableReviewer, but RecordRejection does NOT return the token. This means after rejection, the reviewer token is lost/consumed and never becomes available again, violating the operational requirement that \"becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nThis is a formalism-specific defect because:\n- In Petri net terms, tokens represent resources\n- The missing output arc from RecordRejection means the reviewer token is consumed and never returned\n- This breaks the symmetry required by the operational account where both approval and rejection should restore the reviewer's availability\n\nLet me activate the skill and then provide this analysis.", + "thinkingSignature": "ErESCpoBCBEYAipAra9o2KC12XWgjoq54JWcYf3SsV4WzM8uBQuk3AfHC0eUpcOcOElMA8ODVFxN7OwmTDMqFVOy+1vblDjxUzehjzIZY2xhdWRlLWhhaWt1LTQtNS0yMDI1MTAwMTgAQgh0aGlua2luZ1okMWNiODRmYzQtNDdhYS00ZTFmLWE2NjUtOTQwYWI5ZjgxZjg4qAGPm9zUBhIMTU0Z27ngY497XCQfGgzFgnL02VPgTvAXMLsiMLSfVd531AsosWxQGYD5VNFZzCPo+QvQHKYdt31tclx1PqMVFJN9D6JqSVcKCnXs5yrDEG3jSRfUCwC+nTDJQXTmjWuPfxy5d6qnwD+oKLGLS+EhrVu3XcKxtcvBCWbiQPjA+aMaqwqvX2E/dhrf8PodQ+Fbwb5z5IOLNxBF2m2begVpZtO221Ez6Q1WvMVV7h14fRiVPLNbieDDYK5UabHdgg2Kox1eArS09r54gayS4tdsRnXgVpO8HkxIDmEed2hLbg1Hs9SrPsWxQYoCgCLwv1GYLxezr50enhxLPAiAUJO9ilT8rT0SdwYDVfggNixIhKBe7Lr1PWctY0tTZh7Pia3F8+rH2QRcWOER69MU7DFQfYJJ3gXoUnwRQJ2i5Wb+/0z/R+0zIJhCEqMwpufUHg6TfEOLz3f5/9KaPuIFVbyg0xPsB0MaxBBzSYT4gWaVzLJMp47Ou+f0osVeMUxPQQ43C8ICy2UEnPzoPVLgdY1NABd/cS+OMHmuxk0abfiWx/CxS47dFpBz2mFSf018mmjPASQC76LLL+XKrg7lyIvxTAg2oHW9ir/zf3FyVpW7ESMCWfkyUjphO2g8CxICLDjVQWHOucIP0QmlM8Wp1Z1w8QRZ9LG1PpvNJldB4Mn09ZJnvFbYWN0fNWO2KaPGAUc/RAYiUj4s5/5KUwHV7ZB5xKQm+NgrrF15IFNQvQECD2mBd5pP8yTD4umhtoNOUEC7P+v+CZnYRta50rkiLW0wHHb8kyKrEQCMuvvDXfNg1Dfm1ZcaarJ4PJj+NWkzXP2MD28eDvTLWwttZwTKms+SvDdvf/lIQDVfdtV1T82lDHgKRdzoNPJoi46hWIgzLbINiJ6iD8yjszaQbqDs6Y4SRm7u0RGjO9asWDixQvhLPFSHDhb+G17XcRftmpkBNKmIu70ValPeDnb3BolrqYgj/hOlJF7y+xrFFC/HCfaR1++xEXGJWWjduMhie6s1Ntb9bcjIAS9zzfOmyO/AcjnxYX4l6Ue7C/4lpJPiiRKHqBpNKXcyPrF29Rmq5/Eq2ypVGouD0Cr0csGr+bAKRr15O8pMzJKyqYsAJ3geLCNiSiEG5jd+ntOwn9vPfyN4EL/CwJXPJlWZHA9dB4SxjrxZlKINKepZD7J0xnq4jr1fzJeMGq0eFNuwKwe8pKbpPrJTO1sCQt6Bvzcx9CSTC2TEFWzjWEmIgBuYiVgLm7VLk4uyseCQoxGUwUFTvrw9oswxQo0CnWr2z963B/XBRyWcGp5Esd+zXRFnGFM6C3AZ0ohzUkJ5erFKWMCcAsU5Tkq9diRgcWXJE07wwBWToFX73NkPbz9To6dtw67S1AK7WZ7evAgOa66NrEL+ulyDssRswco+RqtCC1IwbcKVg2ct2DpYKCSgotgsJITpUa5u97n9d9nsvLBGgNqDhOxxDKuy5X3+3lX/DKoXEUTpjILJsu3QO9feW/y46KqGKtGa3hePMjgkyP2xon/3gwE7SY6qyADjRhmLJqeAu2kM/kX4YFIj5DIPm+21oj1JEYT11fDoBrddZcNN29r4O8djYIQqzVds9p2gVBa3FLkp3I5aRZh1mlCvvayxeGZvqfcFLhog4dGSDjFhLizZ6CvIRNGHZ7LcUhokdP+KyXLNO4ygpSwkzh8eByFIkiCefMaDdh/82+WwB4o/SX9BdK2jmwpXF6rIJUJ0LVrwcFSOQXD0o8bDe8Xn1aOG0+nCpUywX9Rue96//9cpYKgZo2TrF+oXHBnfYkCWCEJMJTQsCb9XyggVD3nML68/VyUAlkLZ6Ldd2IzA8/uOpAPyPGSUTOR03hL45Sj3zVIjq7EJvGQOo1Xg9l98SjUkHPJLNpDfP+HjWxRL1FnsDMkuXBKHao/ru1uSEPBvyDN3F0tLiM0Vol5Q4gLOiqZKDavuoXy46YuYNG21lc+qH7eRzR5jhkejvHSA1ry0o4zS42ls0Qx9nkxWdnxlaF/9meYumIGn+dCRlCTUSvdb0//sn0f9oV/tjd/ImbJBTo7LDQX7deYTpfjVHVCtGcUU0pcecsmSlO9Jfio2NgN+R+AoidfjaxMuW/TPNNpT01Vwhixs7j+O0RoJM7svDggQbu/ynAc2t0qnUNrNaPFXeJh4wfAqRrdGCUY+fodPIR1wwwT6kSG7UD4ocNCDKtXRpNkzlifGnnIfTAGv02Zcf/SMK7iGiHsRxFKaBnUk9RAtNYxrwusKkzA76yUta/huggE0zu4sWuzai9CTLElabch9GFbn5rUxa1Z++9yd4uBwd2ShTl4IgPTYw2+RkigAhLtOZJvDBvKNM08ZbGlkjjqR8IOJSImIo05WnVXU1ris5omcBgTfJITF/Yv9D70O5MKhMPk6FCdGz/+dm63rHJUrk1Fl6+4Fmn/LWTjULaCJK/1vcr0WNR/treJxGWDJ8n3w4ysNyMcGbgVxciKCITeiZBBFyCDz0sgW5bWYJQ9dpBcgVg7reXIGgDvXnwSEPspsCF+1X5VF4yH7JvSWPWSbQx6iLC8g7WqLKz4GRohTAWODtvJn+yLZFTUc4UBcGOtZTp56nHiElBHmfRk3wUaLRkl5SlVtEyxJwalhqlWeSuakxQ2A6DnC3XiglE5gP2DE0mzMd8W7M9ArnQJeLUEWzach69oUe5fcCszw44jpHZGCG6Ct7RqywnA7WPwUhvi4D52RPCBtrtVDWwBlgjqp/QpTNdqVMG1tXh53JSxGgOSlBLzm/wZ9szs3pGaf0rjvJIw3sMTk46DR2yBDNoSYFPALpVVpJW/HpCUy72H63tIj2X6W0QjGsgaW4yq/iXR4noLRA1RXRDLd+Uta8PEI+Ygo8yNCSXorwYF6/Qt6YShhLuDzSpxfBKO0bqdmggyVTcrftuXaQRgB" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01MHtk2zZHcKJChuXoYedAqj", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01MHtk2zZHcKJChuXoYedAqj", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I've been asked to review the described target against the operational account and stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. The user specifically said not to interview or mutate a net.\n\nThis is a \"construct-only execution\" branch—the user has supplied a workpiece (operational account) and a target (Petri net description) and wants me to check whether the target correctly implements the account.\n\nAccording to the skill instructions for construct-only execution: \"Use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools.\"\n\nHowever, in this case, the user is asking me to review/check an existing target description against the operational account, not to construct a net. So I should use the checks.md guidance to identify defects.\n\nLet me read the checks.md resource to understand what formalism-specific defects I should look for.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01KzYJTbLcU3iV8m56k3CZAk", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + } + } + ] + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01KzYJTbLcU3iV8m56k3CZAk", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "isError": false + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 66, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:27.883Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284307884 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0T2DA8GRNMM44THBJ28YG", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 67, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:28.852Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0T2DA8GRNMM44THBJ28YG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 68, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:28.853Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "Good", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0T2DA8GRNMM44THBJ28YG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 69, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:29.856Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ", I have the checks guidance. Now I can evaluate the target description against the operational account", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0T2DA8GRNMM44THBJ28YG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 70, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:29.856Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ". The key check that applies here is \"Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nLooking at the operational account and target description:", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0T2DA8GRNMM44THBJ28YG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 71, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:29.856Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "\n\nOperational account says:\n- Each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start\n- The reviewer", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0T2DA8GRNMM44THBJ28YG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 72, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:29.856Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " is unavailable during the check\n- The reviewer becomes available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded\n\nTarget description says:\n- AvailableRe", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0T2DA8GRNMM44THBJ28YG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 73, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:31.187Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "viewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress supplies the", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0T2DA8GRNMM44THBJ28YG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 74, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:31.187Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n- RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection cons", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0T2DA8GRNMM44THBJ28YG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 75, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:31.187Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "umes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nThe formalism-", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0T2DA8GRNMM44THBJ28YG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 76, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:31.187Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "specific defect is clear:\n\nIn the Petri net formalism, tokens represent resources", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0T2DA8GRNMM44THBJ28YG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 77, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:32.475Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ". The operational account requires that the reviewer token be returned to the AvailableReviewer place when either approval OR rejection is recorded.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0T2DA8GRNMM44THBJ28YG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 78, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:32.475Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " However, the target description shows:\n- RecordApproval DOES return the token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection DOES NOT return the token (it consumes the CheckInProgress token", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0T2DA8GRNMM44THBJ28YG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 79, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:32.475Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " but produces no output)\n\nThis violates the structural validity check: \"Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nThe rejection path", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0T2DA8GRNMM44THBJ28YG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 80, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:32.475Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " is a failure/alternative outcome path, and the resource (reviewer token) must return", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0T2DA8GRNMM44THBJ28YG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 81, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:33.771Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " in both the approval and rejection cases, but in the target it only returns in the approval case.\n\nThis is a form", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0T2DA8GRNMM44THBJ28YG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 82, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:33.771Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "alism-specific defect because:\n1. It's specific to how Petri nets represent resource flow through arcs and token", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0T2DA8GRNMM44THBJ28YG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 83, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:33.771Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " consumption/production\n2. The evidence is the missing output arc from RecordRejection back to AvailableReviewer\n3. This is distinct from operational amb", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0T2DA8GRNMM44THBJ28YG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 84, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:33.771Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "iguity—the operational account is clear that both paths should restore availability", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0T2DA8GRNMM44THBJ28YG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 85, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:34.104Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "Good, I have the checks guidance. Now I can evaluate the target description against the operational account. The key check that applies here is \"Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nLooking at the operational account and target description:\n\nOperational account says:\n- Each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start\n- The reviewer is unavailable during the check\n- The reviewer becomes available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded\n\nTarget description says:\n- AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n- RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nThe formalism-specific defect is clear:\n\nIn the Petri net formalism, tokens represent resources. The operational account requires that the reviewer token be returned to the AvailableReviewer place when either approval OR rejection is recorded. However, the target description shows:\n- RecordApproval DOES return the token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection DOES NOT return the token (it consumes the CheckInProgress token but produces no output)\n\nThis violates the structural validity check: \"Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nThe rejection path is a failure/alternative outcome path, and the resource (reviewer token) must return in both the approval and rejection cases, but in the target it only returns in the approval case.\n\nThis is a formalism-specific defect because:\n1. It's specific to how Petri nets represent resource flow through arcs and token consumption/production\n2. The evidence is the missing output arc from RecordRejection back to AvailableReviewer\n3. This is distinct from operational ambiguity—the operational account is clear that both paths should restore availability", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0T2DA8GRNMM44THBJ28YG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 86, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:34.104Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "**First supported", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0T2DA8GRNMM44THBJ28YG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 87, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:35.108Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " formalism-specific defect:**\n\n**Asymmetric reviewer token return on failure paths.**\n\nThe operational account requires the reviewer to become available again when **", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0T2DA8GRNMM44THBJ28YG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 88, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:35.108Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "either** approval or rejection is recorded. However, the target description shows:\n- **RecordApproval** returns the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer (supports the requirement), but", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0T2DA8GRNMM44THBJ28YG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 89, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:35.108Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "\n- **RecordRejection** consumes the CheckInProgress token with **no output arc** returning the reviewer token.\n\n**Evidence:**\n\nIn the Petri net formalism, tokens represent re", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0T2DA8GRNMM44THBJ28YG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 90, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:36.149Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "usable resources and must flow out of a transition via output arcs to be restored. The missing", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0T2DA8GRNMM44THBJ28YG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 91, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:36.149Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " output arc from RecordRejection means the reviewer token is consumed (removed from the net) and never reaches AvailableReviewer. This violates the structural validity principle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0T2DA8GRNMM44THBJ28YG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 92, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:36.149Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " that \"shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nThe rejection outcome is a valid terminal path in the operational", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0T2DA8GRNMM44THBJ28YG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 93, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:36.149Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " account but is not a recovery or destruction path—it is equivalent in status to approval and must", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0T2DA8GRNMM44THBJ28YG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 94, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:36.510Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " release the resource identically.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0T2DA8GRNMM44THBJ28YG", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 95, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:36.510Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0T2DA8GRNMM44THBJ28YG", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 8677, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8L7ckAKySecqo5Eyiz", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, I have the checks guidance. Now I can evaluate the target description against the operational account. The key check that applies here is \"Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nLooking at the operational account and target description:\n\nOperational account says:\n- Each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start\n- The reviewer is unavailable during the check\n- The reviewer becomes available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded\n\nTarget description says:\n- AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n- RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nThe formalism-specific defect is clear:\n\nIn the Petri net formalism, tokens represent resources. The operational account requires that the reviewer token be returned to the AvailableReviewer place when either approval OR rejection is recorded. However, the target description shows:\n- RecordApproval DOES return the token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection DOES NOT return the token (it consumes the CheckInProgress token but produces no output)\n\nThis violates the structural validity check: \"Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nThe rejection path is a failure/alternative outcome path, and the resource (reviewer token) must return in both the approval and rejection cases, but in the target it only returns in the approval case.\n\nThis is a formalism-specific defect because:\n1. It's specific to how Petri nets represent resource flow through arcs and token consumption/production\n2. The evidence is the missing output arc from RecordRejection back to AvailableReviewer\n3. This is distinct from operational ambiguity—the operational account is clear that both paths should restore availability", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "**First supported formalism-specific defect:**\n\n**Asymmetric reviewer token return on failure paths.**\n\nThe operational account requires the reviewer to become available again when **either** approval or rejection is recorded. However, the target description shows:\n- **RecordApproval** returns the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer (supports the requirement), but\n- **RecordRejection** consumes the CheckInProgress token with **no output arc** returning the reviewer token.\n\n**Evidence:**\n\nIn the Petri net formalism, tokens represent reusable resources and must flow out of a transition via output arcs to be restored. The missing output arc from RecordRejection means the reviewer token is consumed (removed from the net) and never reaches AvailableReviewer. This violates the structural validity principle that \"shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nThe rejection outcome is a valid terminal path in the operational account but is not a recovery or destruction path—it is equivalent in status to approval and must release the resource identically." + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 13, + "output": 709, + "cacheRead": 4223, + "cacheWrite": 1385, + "totalTokens": 6330, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000013, + "output": 0.0035450000000000004, + "cacheRead": 0.0004223, + "cacheWrite": 0.00173125, + "total": 0.005711550000000001 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 96, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:36.560Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, I have the checks guidance. Now I can evaluate the target description against the operational account. The key check that applies here is \"Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nLooking at the operational account and target description:\n\nOperational account says:\n- Each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start\n- The reviewer is unavailable during the check\n- The reviewer becomes available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded\n\nTarget description says:\n- AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n- RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nThe formalism-specific defect is clear:\n\nIn the Petri net formalism, tokens represent resources. The operational account requires that the reviewer token be returned to the AvailableReviewer place when either approval OR rejection is recorded. However, the target description shows:\n- RecordApproval DOES return the token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection DOES NOT return the token (it consumes the CheckInProgress token but produces no output)\n\nThis violates the structural validity check: \"Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nThe rejection path is a failure/alternative outcome path, and the resource (reviewer token) must return in both the approval and rejection cases, but in the target it only returns in the approval case.\n\nThis is a formalism-specific defect because:\n1. It's specific to how Petri nets represent resource flow through arcs and token consumption/production\n2. The evidence is the missing output arc from RecordRejection back to AvailableReviewer\n3. This is distinct from operational ambiguity—the operational account is clear that both paths should restore availability", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "**First supported formalism-specific defect:**\n\n**Asymmetric reviewer token return on failure paths.**\n\nThe operational account requires the reviewer to become available again when **either** approval or rejection is recorded. However, the target description shows:\n- **RecordApproval** returns the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer (supports the requirement), but\n- **RecordRejection** consumes the CheckInProgress token with **no output arc** returning the reviewer token.\n\n**Evidence:**\n\nIn the Petri net formalism, tokens represent reusable resources and must flow out of a transition via output arcs to be restored. The missing output arc from RecordRejection means the reviewer token is consumed (removed from the net) and never reaches AvailableReviewer. This violates the structural validity principle that \"shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nThe rejection outcome is a valid terminal path in the operational account but is not a recovery or destruction path—it is equivalent in status to approval and must release the resource identically." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 13, + "output": 709, + "cacheRead": 4223, + "cacheWrite": 1385, + "totalTokens": 6330, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000013, + "output": 0.0035450000000000004, + "cacheRead": 0.0004223, + "cacheWrite": 0.00173125, + "total": 0.005711550000000001 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 459 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284307884, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8L7ckAKySecqo5Eyiz", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0T2DA8GRNMM44THBJ28YG", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 97, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:36.560Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0T2DA8GRNMM44THBJ28YG", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, I have the checks guidance. Now I can evaluate the target description against the operational account. The key check that applies here is \"Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nLooking at the operational account and target description:\n\nOperational account says:\n- Each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start\n- The reviewer is unavailable during the check\n- The reviewer becomes available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded\n\nTarget description says:\n- AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n- RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nThe formalism-specific defect is clear:\n\nIn the Petri net formalism, tokens represent resources. The operational account requires that the reviewer token be returned to the AvailableReviewer place when either approval OR rejection is recorded. However, the target description shows:\n- RecordApproval DOES return the token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection DOES NOT return the token (it consumes the CheckInProgress token but produces no output)\n\nThis violates the structural validity check: \"Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nThe rejection path is a failure/alternative outcome path, and the resource (reviewer token) must return in both the approval and rejection cases, but in the target it only returns in the approval case.\n\nThis is a formalism-specific defect because:\n1. It's specific to how Petri nets represent resource flow through arcs and token consumption/production\n2. The evidence is the missing output arc from RecordRejection back to AvailableReviewer\n3. This is distinct from operational ambiguity—the operational account is clear that both paths should restore availability", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "**First supported formalism-specific defect:**\n\n**Asymmetric reviewer token return on failure paths.**\n\nThe operational account requires the reviewer to become available again when **either** approval or rejection is recorded. However, the target description shows:\n- **RecordApproval** returns the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer (supports the requirement), but\n- **RecordRejection** consumes the CheckInProgress token with **no output arc** returning the reviewer token.\n\n**Evidence:**\n\nIn the Petri net formalism, tokens represent reusable resources and must flow out of a transition via output arcs to be restored. The missing output arc from RecordRejection means the reviewer token is consumed (removed from the net) and never reaches AvailableReviewer. This violates the structural validity principle that \"shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nThe rejection outcome is a valid terminal path in the operational account but is not a recovery or destruction path—it is equivalent in status to approval and must release the resource identically." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 13, + "output": 709, + "cacheRead": 4223, + "cacheWrite": 1385, + "totalTokens": 6330, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000013, + "output": 0.0035450000000000004, + "cacheRead": 0.0004223, + "cacheWrite": 0.00173125, + "total": 0.005711550000000001 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 459 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284307884, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8L7ckAKySecqo5Eyiz", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 98, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:36.561Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to review an operational account against a target description (which appears to be a Petri net formalism description) and identify any formalism-specific defects.\n\nLet me break down what I'm being asked:\n1. Operational account: describes the intended behavior\n2. Target description: describes how a Petri net should implement it\n3. Task: stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence\n4. Do not interview, do not mutate a net\n\nI should activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first, as this is about operational process modeling and analyzing whether a Petri net design matches the operational intent.\n\nThe operational account says:\n- Each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start\n- The reviewer is unavailable during the check\n- The reviewer becomes available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded\n\nThe target description says:\n- AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n- RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nThe defect is clear: according to the operational account, the reviewer should become available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded. However, the target description shows that RecordApproval returns the token to AvailableReviewer, but RecordRejection does NOT return the token. This means after rejection, the reviewer token is lost/consumed and never becomes available again, violating the operational requirement that \"becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\"\n\nThis is a formalism-specific defect because:\n- In Petri net terms, tokens represent resources\n- The missing output arc from RecordRejection means the reviewer token is consumed and never returned\n- This breaks the symmetry required by the operational account where both approval and rejection should restore the reviewer's availability\n\nLet me activate the skill and then provide this analysis.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01MHtk2zZHcKJChuXoYedAqj", + "name": "activate_skill", + "arguments": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2538, + "output": 513, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3051, + "cost": { + "input": 0.002538, + "output": 0.002565, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005103 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 451 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284299446, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8KVVraMskf5RY2BFZq", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01MHtk2zZHcKJChuXoYedAqj", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. #### Required disclosure gate\n\nBefore any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain.\n\nRequired universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read `universal-elicitation.md` from this skill.\n\nIf human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance later.\n\nIf the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking resources without asking an avoidable question. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md\n- pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/pn-construction.md\n- sdcpn-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/sdcpn-elicitation.md\n- universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/universal-elicitation.md\n- workpiece-template.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/workpiece-template.md\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "skill": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284303921 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I've been asked to review the described target against the operational account and stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. The user specifically said not to interview or mutate a net.\n\nThis is a \"construct-only execution\" branch—the user has supplied a workpiece (operational account) and a target (Petri net description) and wants me to check whether the target correctly implements the account.\n\nAccording to the skill instructions for construct-only execution: \"Use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools.\"\n\nHowever, in this case, the user is asking me to review/check an existing target description against the operational account, not to construct a net. So I should use the checks.md guidance to identify defects.\n\nLet me read the checks.md resource to understand what formalism-specific defects I should look for.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "toolCall", + "id": "toolu_01KzYJTbLcU3iV8m56k3CZAk", + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "arguments": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md" + } + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 12, + "output": 313, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 4223, + "totalTokens": 4548, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000012, + "output": 0.0015650000000000002, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0.00527875, + "total": 0.00685575 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 221 + }, + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "timestamp": 1788284303924, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8KprgiGQGghh2ukvTi", + "rawStopReason": "tool_use" + }, + { + "role": "toolResult", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01KzYJTbLcU3iV8m56k3CZAk", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks\n\nRead this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references.\n\nThese checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial.\n\n## Before construction\n\n- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case.\n- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved.\n- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result.\n- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged.\n- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present.\n\nIf materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry.\n\n## During construction\n\n- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation.\n- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference.\n- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose.\n- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it.\n- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change.\n- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece.\n\n## Structural validity\n\n- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case.\n- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity.\n- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs.\n- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion.\n- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\n- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them.\n- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state.\n- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior.\n\nA parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check.\n\n## Fidelity and uncertainty\n\n- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims.\n- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece.\n- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context.\n- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support.\n- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior.\n- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece.\n- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity.\n\n## Existing-net revision\n\n- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation.\n- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material.\n- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change.\n- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements.\n- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed.\n\n## Delivery\n\nDeliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one.\n\nState plainly:\n\n- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked;\n- what the result can support and what it must not claim;\n- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain;\n- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and\n- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any.\n\nDo not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop.\n" + } + ], + "details": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A895714f96483ea31/checks.md", + "lines": 72 + }, + "isError": false, + "timestamp": 1788284307880 + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "Good, I have the checks guidance. Now I can evaluate the target description against the operational account. The key check that applies here is \"Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nLooking at the operational account and target description:\n\nOperational account says:\n- Each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start\n- The reviewer is unavailable during the check\n- The reviewer becomes available again when EITHER approval OR rejection is recorded\n\nTarget description says:\n- AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck\n- CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval\n- RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token\n\nThe formalism-specific defect is clear:\n\nIn the Petri net formalism, tokens represent resources. The operational account requires that the reviewer token be returned to the AvailableReviewer place when either approval OR rejection is recorded. However, the target description shows:\n- RecordApproval DOES return the token to AvailableReviewer\n- RecordRejection DOES NOT return the token (it consumes the CheckInProgress token but produces no output)\n\nThis violates the structural validity check: \"Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nThe rejection path is a failure/alternative outcome path, and the resource (reviewer token) must return in both the approval and rejection cases, but in the target it only returns in the approval case.\n\nThis is a formalism-specific defect because:\n1. It's specific to how Petri nets represent resource flow through arcs and token consumption/production\n2. The evidence is the missing output arc from RecordRejection back to AvailableReviewer\n3. This is distinct from operational ambiguity—the operational account is clear that both paths should restore availability", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "**First supported formalism-specific defect:**\n\n**Asymmetric reviewer token return on failure paths.**\n\nThe operational account requires the reviewer to become available again when **either** approval or rejection is recorded. However, the target description shows:\n- **RecordApproval** returns the reviewer token to AvailableReviewer (supports the requirement), but\n- **RecordRejection** consumes the CheckInProgress token with **no output arc** returning the reviewer token.\n\n**Evidence:**\n\nIn the Petri net formalism, tokens represent reusable resources and must flow out of a transition via output arcs to be restored. The missing output arc from RecordRejection means the reviewer token is consumed (removed from the net) and never reaches AvailableReviewer. This violates the structural validity principle that \"shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths.\"\n\nThe rejection outcome is a valid terminal path in the operational account but is not a recovery or destruction path—it is equivalent in status to approval and must release the resource identically." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 13, + "output": 709, + "cacheRead": 4223, + "cacheWrite": 1385, + "totalTokens": 6330, + "cost": { + "input": 0.000013, + "output": 0.0035450000000000004, + "cacheRead": 0.0004223, + "cacheWrite": 0.00173125, + "total": 0.005711550000000001 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 459 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284307884, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8L7ckAKySecqo5Eyiz", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 99, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:36.561Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 17133, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 100, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:36.562Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0ST4DTEX9VM7FJ6GZK4ZP", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0ST55YKEVVKER6HM5QEK0", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 101, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:36.562Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0ST4AZXCS62EH436GK7S1", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "9a31a1a6659b1dda127fcc16362b47bc5ffdb036c75adb3932aa62c57376a042", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 102, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:36.562Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "d2d42344c40ddeb2471eeeba437032079bd2c7083afdbc2f9de5e823f841d5b8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "ebec2ac5faab6cbbbe26eeeebc2d7ac0ba7dc637fd43ea9b5917f8e0277f5515", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "c7cb5b2222b0d1b5aff861c4056f41ba8825aca284ec774d8e4f0fbf12807314", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "321f8405c12374315d61caf466001d6b4b5cf68b04325df77a7948daaa680de1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/scenarios.json": "1844df940b8de9d10d28e9537f966920aba581b36956a9ac26a3767824ca96cb", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/protocol.md": "ef1443bb02c6c26d4ded6edf9e023579bc32cdc394f90490edfb34eaf32b8ed2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md": "8cd2749c8292f01045ab4282fc7248c07046cecaf14a586a9ef286e2876cf8bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md": "82b035268c07cc8ee4736b5ffdd392c8f153793d2ca6b9ed57271c9b6146de10", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md": "8826b85d32d6c24fbc8f678ec394600676ec61c4a0b83d0a9cfa16be87fc5d76", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "1a2417cc5f9649d459c5efbc87cd3242db99a9717622a6d86073c72835818865" + }, + "promptSelection": { + "candidateCorePromptIncluded": true, + "v3SdcpnAppendIncluded": true, + "legacyCorePromptIncluded": false, + "legacyRoleMarkerIncluded": false, + "initialSystemPromptSha256": "ad472c3919f1857f1f5f02f83bf0adb83c4795808e44f2b58813b158585b61f7" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "candidateCorePrompt": "6a458c0bbbc9dee5b4454a54b032818227ab681ba9f7beaa60d4fe9628f6eb41", + "v3SdcpnAppend": "73cac46487d33051a90cc487ea7abfc11fec4b049af11a108396ec08d44569fb", + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S4-independent-r1.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S4-independent-r1.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b7edb5551b2 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S4-independent-r1.json @@ -0,0 +1,1036 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v3-independent-s4-515556b5", + "phase": "paid", + "instrumentVersion": "v3", + "candidate": "independent", + "scenarioId": "S4", + "scenario": { + "title": "Review exposing an implicit human-knowledge gap", + "prompt": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while checking a request. Recording approval releases that reviewer. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection also returns it immediately. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer.", + "stopAfter": "One focused question exposing the unresolved appeal and reviewer-availability relationship.", + "expected": "Load universal and SDCPN elicitation judgment, then ask whether appeal responsibility keeps the original reviewer unavailable for new reviews or permits concurrent assignment." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "**Conflict identified:**\n\nThe operational account requires that \"the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal,\" but the target design severs that connection.\n\nSpecifically:\n- The target releases the reviewer immediately on `RecordRejection`\n- The target's `AppealSubmitted` carries no association with the original reviewer\n\nThese two decisions together would leave no way for the original reviewer—who is no longer reserved and has no stored link to the case—to answer appeal questions. The operation requires the reviewer to remain reachable during the appeal window; the target requires them to be untracked after rejection.\n\n**Stop:** Do you intend for the original reviewer to be contactable during appeals?", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling", "elicitation"], + "activatedSkills": [], + "toolCalls": [], + "readOutputs": [], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 5659, + "inputTokens": 2589, + "outputTokens": 664, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 3253, + "cost": 0.005909 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 5659, + "inputTokens": 2589, + "outputTokens": 664, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 3253, + "cost": 0.005909 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nReview the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while checking a request. Recording approval releases that reviewer. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection also returns it immediately. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer.\n\n## Assistant\n**Conflict identified:**\n\nThe operational account requires that \"the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal,\" but the target design severs that connection.\n\nSpecifically:\n- The target releases the reviewer immediately on `RecordRejection`\n- The target's `AppealSubmitted` carries no association with the original reviewer\n\nThese two decisions together would leave no way for the original reviewer—who is no longer reserved and has no stored link to the case—to answer appeal questions. The operation requires the reviewer to remain reachable during the appeal window; the target requires them to be untracked after rejection.\n\n**Stop:** Do you intend for the original reviewer to be contactable during appeals?", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TRYVH3FZAJ47G91G7YEF", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000015", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFGMFRSWVNZUTcwQzJEMkRSMEQwQUhX", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while checking a request. Recording approval releases that reviewer. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection also returns it immediately. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1F0TSKM5MA1793HB59SRSHZ", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0TRZVZNWG2DJVMZWVTKTN", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The user is asking me to review an operational account against a target description and identify the first consequential action/discrepancy. Let me break down what's stated:\n\n**Operational account:**\n1. A reviewer is reserved while checking a request\n2. Recording approval releases that reviewer\n3. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal\n4. The original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal\n5. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review\n\n**Target description (what the net is supposed to do):**\n1. StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\n2. RecordApproval returns it\n3. RecordRejection also returns it immediately\n4. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer\n\nLet me compare these:\n\n1. \"Reviewer is reserved while checking\" vs \"StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\" - this aligns\n2. \"Recording approval releases that reviewer\" vs \"RecordApproval returns it\" - this aligns\n3. \"After rejection... requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions\" vs \"RecordRejection also returns it immediately\" and \"AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer\" - PROBLEM HERE\n\nThe operational account says:\n- After rejection, the requester can appeal\n- The ORIGINAL reviewer answers case questions during appeal\n- This implies the original reviewer must remain associated with the request/case through the appeal period\n\nThe target description says:\n- RecordRejection returns the reviewer immediately\n- AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer\n\nThis is a direct conflict. If the original reviewer is released immediately upon rejection, and if the appeal carries no association with the original reviewer, then there's no way for \"the original reviewer to answer case questions raised during an appeal\" as stated in the operational account.\n\nThe first consequential action is identifying this conflict: the target design would make it impossible to fulfill the requirement that the original reviewer answer questions during appeal, because the reviewer would be released and no longer associated with the request.\nI'll flag this discrepancy plainly, without fabricating a resolving rule or suggesting how to fix it.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "**Conflict identified:**\n\nThe operational account requires that \"the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal,\" but the target design severs that connection.\n\nSpecifically:\n- The target releases the reviewer immediately on `RecordRejection`\n- The target's `AppealSubmitted` carries no association with the original reviewer\n\nThese two decisions together would leave no way for the original reviewer—who is no longer reserved and has no stored link to the case—to answer appeal questions. The operation requires the reviewer to remain reachable during the appeal window; the target requires them to be untracked after rejection.\n\n**Stop:** Do you intend for the original reviewer to be contactable during appeals?", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1F0TRYT51RHFM4CBV6EF91G" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:50.971Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:50.974Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TRZNF8V474RG33KWKT4D", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TRYVH3FZAJ47G91G7YEF", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:50.997Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TRYVH3FZAJ47G91G7YEF", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TRZNF8V474RG33KWKT4D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:51.002Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0TRZVZNWG2DJVMZWVTKTN", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TRYVH3FZAJ47G91G7YEF", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TRZNF8V474RG33KWKT4D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:51.003Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0TRZVZNWG2DJVMZWVTKTN", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n- **elicitation** — Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while checking a request. Recording approval releases that reviewer. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection also returns it immediately. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TRYVH3FZAJ47G91G7YEF", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TRZNF8V474RG33KWKT4D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:51.004Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284331014 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0TRZVZNWG2DJVMZWVTKTN", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TRYVH3FZAJ47G91G7YEF", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TRZNF8V474RG33KWKT4D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:51.637Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TRYVH3FZAJ47G91G7YEF", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TRZNF8V474RG33KWKT4D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0TRZVZNWG2DJVMZWVTKTN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:51.639Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "The", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TRYVH3FZAJ47G91G7YEF", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TRZNF8V474RG33KWKT4D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0TRZVZNWG2DJVMZWVTKTN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:52.643Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " user is asking me to review an operational account against a target description and identify the first consequential action/discrepancy. Let me break down what's stated:\n\n**Operational account:**\n1", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TRYVH3FZAJ47G91G7YEF", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TRZNF8V474RG33KWKT4D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0TRZVZNWG2DJVMZWVTKTN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:52.643Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ". A reviewer is reserved while checking a request\n2. Recording approval releases that reviewer\n3. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal\n4. The original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal\n5. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review\n\n**Target description (what the net", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TRYVH3FZAJ47G91G7YEF", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TRZNF8V474RG33KWKT4D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0TRZVZNWG2DJVMZWVTKTN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:52.643Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " is supposed to do):**\n1. StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\n2. RecordApproval returns it\n3. RecordRejection also returns it immediately\n4. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer\n\nLet me compare these:", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TRYVH3FZAJ47G91G7YEF", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TRZNF8V474RG33KWKT4D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0TRZVZNWG2DJVMZWVTKTN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:52.643Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "\n\n1. \"Reviewer is reserved while checking\" vs \"StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\" - this aligns\n2. \"Recording approval releases that reviewer\" vs \"RecordApproval returns it\" - this aligns\n3. \"After rejection... requ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TRYVH3FZAJ47G91G7YEF", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TRZNF8V474RG33KWKT4D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0TRZVZNWG2DJVMZWVTKTN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:53.894Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "ester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions\" vs \"RecordRejection also returns it immediately\" and \"AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer\" - PROBLEM HERE\n\nThe operational account says:\n- After rejection, the requester can", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TRYVH3FZAJ47G91G7YEF", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TRZNF8V474RG33KWKT4D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0TRZVZNWG2DJVMZWVTKTN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:53.894Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " appeal\n- The ORIGINAL reviewer answers case questions during appeal\n- This implies the original reviewer must remain associated with the request/case through the appeal period\n\nThe", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TRYVH3FZAJ47G91G7YEF", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TRZNF8V474RG33KWKT4D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0TRZVZNWG2DJVMZWVTKTN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:53.894Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " target description says:\n- RecordRejection returns the reviewer immediately\n- AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer\n\nThis is a direct conflict", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TRYVH3FZAJ47G91G7YEF", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TRZNF8V474RG33KWKT4D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0TRZVZNWG2DJVMZWVTKTN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:53.894Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": ". If the original reviewer is released immediately upon rejection, and if the appeal carries no association with the original reviewer, then there's no way", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TRYVH3FZAJ47G91G7YEF", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TRZNF8V474RG33KWKT4D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0TRZVZNWG2DJVMZWVTKTN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:55.210Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " for \"the original reviewer to answer case questions raised during an appeal\" as stated in the operational account.\n\nThe first consequential action is identifying this conflict: the target", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TRYVH3FZAJ47G91G7YEF", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TRZNF8V474RG33KWKT4D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0TRZVZNWG2DJVMZWVTKTN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:55.210Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " design would make it impossible to fulfill the requirement that the original reviewer answer questions during appeal, because", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TRYVH3FZAJ47G91G7YEF", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TRZNF8V474RG33KWKT4D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0TRZVZNWG2DJVMZWVTKTN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:55.210Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " the reviewer would be released and no longer associated with the request.\n", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TRYVH3FZAJ47G91G7YEF", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TRZNF8V474RG33KWKT4D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0TRZVZNWG2DJVMZWVTKTN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:55.210Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "I", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TRYVH3FZAJ47G91G7YEF", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TRZNF8V474RG33KWKT4D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0TRZVZNWG2DJVMZWVTKTN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:56.253Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "'", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TRYVH3FZAJ47G91G7YEF", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TRZNF8V474RG33KWKT4D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0TRZVZNWG2DJVMZWVTKTN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:56.253Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "ll flag this discrepancy plainly, without fabricating a resolving rule or suggesting how to fix it.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TRYVH3FZAJ47G91G7YEF", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TRZNF8V474RG33KWKT4D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0TRZVZNWG2DJVMZWVTKTN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:56.253Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "The user is asking me to review an operational account against a target description and identify the first consequential action/discrepancy. Let me break down what's stated:\n\n**Operational account:**\n1. A reviewer is reserved while checking a request\n2. Recording approval releases that reviewer\n3. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal\n4. The original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal\n5. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review\n\n**Target description (what the net is supposed to do):**\n1. StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\n2. RecordApproval returns it\n3. RecordRejection also returns it immediately\n4. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer\n\nLet me compare these:\n\n1. \"Reviewer is reserved while checking\" vs \"StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\" - this aligns\n2. \"Recording approval releases that reviewer\" vs \"RecordApproval returns it\" - this aligns\n3. \"After rejection... requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions\" vs \"RecordRejection also returns it immediately\" and \"AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer\" - PROBLEM HERE\n\nThe operational account says:\n- After rejection, the requester can appeal\n- The ORIGINAL reviewer answers case questions during appeal\n- This implies the original reviewer must remain associated with the request/case through the appeal period\n\nThe target description says:\n- RecordRejection returns the reviewer immediately\n- AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer\n\nThis is a direct conflict. If the original reviewer is released immediately upon rejection, and if the appeal carries no association with the original reviewer, then there's no way for \"the original reviewer to answer case questions raised during an appeal\" as stated in the operational account.\n\nThe first consequential action is identifying this conflict: the target design would make it impossible to fulfill the requirement that the original reviewer answer questions during appeal, because the reviewer would be released and no longer associated with the request.\nI'll flag this discrepancy plainly, without fabricating a resolving rule or suggesting how to fix it.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TRYVH3FZAJ47G91G7YEF", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TRZNF8V474RG33KWKT4D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0TRZVZNWG2DJVMZWVTKTN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:56.253Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "**Conflict identified:**\n\nThe operational account requires that \"the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal,\" but the target design severs that connection.\n\nSpecifically:\n- The target releases", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TRYVH3FZAJ47G91G7YEF", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TRZNF8V474RG33KWKT4D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0TRZVZNWG2DJVMZWVTKTN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:56.652Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " the reviewer immediately on `RecordRejection`\n- The target's `AppealSubmitted` carries no association with the original reviewer\n\nThese two decisions together would", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TRYVH3FZAJ47G91G7YEF", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TRZNF8V474RG33KWKT4D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0TRZVZNWG2DJVMZWVTKTN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:56.652Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " leave no way for the original reviewer—who is no longer reserved and has no stored link to the case—to answer appeal questions. The operation requires", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TRYVH3FZAJ47G91G7YEF", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TRZNF8V474RG33KWKT4D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0TRZVZNWG2DJVMZWVTKTN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:56.652Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " the reviewer to remain reachable during the appeal window; the target requires them to be untr", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TRYVH3FZAJ47G91G7YEF", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TRZNF8V474RG33KWKT4D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0TRZVZNWG2DJVMZWVTKTN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:56.652Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "acked after rejection.\n\n**Stop:** Do you intend for the original reviewer to be contactable during appeals?", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TRYVH3FZAJ47G91G7YEF", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TRZNF8V474RG33KWKT4D", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0TRZVZNWG2DJVMZWVTKTN", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:56.653Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0TRZVZNWG2DJVMZWVTKTN", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 5659, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8MpTS4ES3PDfWtXjBc", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to review an operational account against a target description and identify the first consequential action/discrepancy. Let me break down what's stated:\n\n**Operational account:**\n1. A reviewer is reserved while checking a request\n2. Recording approval releases that reviewer\n3. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal\n4. The original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal\n5. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review\n\n**Target description (what the net is supposed to do):**\n1. StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\n2. RecordApproval returns it\n3. RecordRejection also returns it immediately\n4. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer\n\nLet me compare these:\n\n1. \"Reviewer is reserved while checking\" vs \"StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\" - this aligns\n2. \"Recording approval releases that reviewer\" vs \"RecordApproval returns it\" - this aligns\n3. \"After rejection... requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions\" vs \"RecordRejection also returns it immediately\" and \"AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer\" - PROBLEM HERE\n\nThe operational account says:\n- After rejection, the requester can appeal\n- The ORIGINAL reviewer answers case questions during appeal\n- This implies the original reviewer must remain associated with the request/case through the appeal period\n\nThe target description says:\n- RecordRejection returns the reviewer immediately\n- AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer\n\nThis is a direct conflict. If the original reviewer is released immediately upon rejection, and if the appeal carries no association with the original reviewer, then there's no way for \"the original reviewer to answer case questions raised during an appeal\" as stated in the operational account.\n\nThe first consequential action is identifying this conflict: the target design would make it impossible to fulfill the requirement that the original reviewer answer questions during appeal, because the reviewer would be released and no longer associated with the request.\nI'll flag this discrepancy plainly, without fabricating a resolving rule or suggesting how to fix it.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "**Conflict identified:**\n\nThe operational account requires that \"the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal,\" but the target design severs that connection.\n\nSpecifically:\n- The target releases the reviewer immediately on `RecordRejection`\n- The target's `AppealSubmitted` carries no association with the original reviewer\n\nThese two decisions together would leave no way for the original reviewer—who is no longer reserved and has no stored link to the case—to answer appeal questions. The operation requires the reviewer to remain reachable during the appeal window; the target requires them to be untracked after rejection.\n\n**Stop:** Do you intend for the original reviewer to be contactable during appeals?" + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2589, + "output": 664, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3253, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0025889999999999997, + "output": 0.0033200000000000005, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005909 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TRYVH3FZAJ47G91G7YEF", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TRZNF8V474RG33KWKT4D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:56.663Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to review an operational account against a target description and identify the first consequential action/discrepancy. Let me break down what's stated:\n\n**Operational account:**\n1. A reviewer is reserved while checking a request\n2. Recording approval releases that reviewer\n3. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal\n4. The original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal\n5. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review\n\n**Target description (what the net is supposed to do):**\n1. StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\n2. RecordApproval returns it\n3. RecordRejection also returns it immediately\n4. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer\n\nLet me compare these:\n\n1. \"Reviewer is reserved while checking\" vs \"StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\" - this aligns\n2. \"Recording approval releases that reviewer\" vs \"RecordApproval returns it\" - this aligns\n3. \"After rejection... requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions\" vs \"RecordRejection also returns it immediately\" and \"AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer\" - PROBLEM HERE\n\nThe operational account says:\n- After rejection, the requester can appeal\n- The ORIGINAL reviewer answers case questions during appeal\n- This implies the original reviewer must remain associated with the request/case through the appeal period\n\nThe target description says:\n- RecordRejection returns the reviewer immediately\n- AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer\n\nThis is a direct conflict. If the original reviewer is released immediately upon rejection, and if the appeal carries no association with the original reviewer, then there's no way for \"the original reviewer to answer case questions raised during an appeal\" as stated in the operational account.\n\nThe first consequential action is identifying this conflict: the target design would make it impossible to fulfill the requirement that the original reviewer answer questions during appeal, because the reviewer would be released and no longer associated with the request.\nI'll flag this discrepancy plainly, without fabricating a resolving rule or suggesting how to fix it.", + "thinkingSignature": "EvcUCpoBCBEYAipAbp6nGTopv11v494Xb92rl5W7wqz+KSHfdvKpsuSjE6m+jq/NebTD/38J4VCCtQBsWECgFQaYDp46CN5e+8g3DjIZY2xhdWRlLWhhaWt1LTQtNS0yMDI1MTAwMTgAQgh0aGlua2luZ1okMWNiODRmYzQtNDdhYS00ZTFmLWE2NjUtOTQwYWI5ZjgxZjg4qAGwm9zUBhIMlYXP+cUMgTQSKQWSGgwdbO9HVB05mOPpHqUiMJWuFQNilTkCqez6Bov8pv0LUpAGSQDFmmen51Cq+gI01IVuJur5HghL7HE+HQ9OeiqJE1pi0LFWtKXM4xuXR3fiVw5KahcsWMTLNLLeFL3EfUhGkV1sqsndnfTFB1EoYDZ2MXqvqaZpflhzViCXlhP9VHOW+8mg1lk8c5vbynnH3qrxYqkxDP4uJPphRFTTxSZKMxI0KnPEtIdAdzkMZnyRJxN6f8Dk8otgOjFeOKo3I7cLJmz/gzxDd8m7MM6v9/lXJq9M0PZQSmiw6ERTeI97MkLu0QNCiXwvsWzyxUW0XPHigrz8VW0DuCvYnVQdoSLD6wo0HzwiC7n1q+xClhUSAdCULJB9RYVXQBNRV+qJQMUb/OElkv62UKEqVYMJWapDoyR9C2VLcY48PyppaumV7nb7FJJh+giJTz4yu/3NzYes9ov+H3jOJY3Q0SNctb8cjlHNGIQWgyQ4im42SFtmVbY3/JpwhGHEZ6N1MccIQ97uQ61JvAfMPDu1ztCFNzAAZdLfCZRDYFHbFuluZAuEm0lf4L31Y75kxwrfvUC3I/AbF04qT0K/tv/COEKleVOiB6ZtYE5AK1AXQNyuaKgQLvi4Fd/LsAO7XBCOBLnHSVZMppr8F6ZBqCudXcV519TEmBHS6H2OiUcd/tRGVaLpxh2kZq/C/LUCn6BUG49PThZ0zg8cptQemYOeLPDcTTi6MLHzPFkPdUrIDnsxdcg5ksI1I0L3yKVoxViq2ipAtvYkqbs+pt/joyBB84GUthDlsZjttVXverh5Ne/EZo4/2gXvr1XFHAJX2pZ7b2W7jTZ21PAaDD7uxW2ijOblUqxFY9ZbM997VcmucsjW9zzwIA8fbue6+VOggaB4mWulymTx4zYYdokYlFRA98mqFGXAl9/MxSzkUOXzSz54Zq5t3lYY9wokoPVLQIusB8t3C1aXyOSQX+xtXvCAo7EMhEcv0QmLQ79XLH8ps88DCvIQy1V2X9T/jLJoU06p9OluJf3cAVS8Q0S0NULi5JM3Lfh3ybc0jlQyPEfT7Lf3V1SSqnSHXYJk3O0/XTPWNWBkLL3IR1+65xtRWY0kVPCC/s2Ff9mzkfcyMtv36YGkiP+2BLQiTU76NS/oa4UbpBF8buKdGPlUnls82PWe8Olqxib6yChgcr2T7sqpFNt+hcTErnbGb3hRb+LzwQ74A32R+K09CbBdA8MS2BbfGRuXHHDpV+KWkQXDgQe48L6lH+xHK37nMlwJQjxszKuxDSNuqRy96BYs8/f1y2n+BgcLlm3pccqajZTXWR8EtToITGUtawO3CUb7kGQWBGylfo8OdijSgpeW9Y4xzGa6K8RPtzTbWGVxURL0R5KimhiGA6zYXINPjm/g+FpGEaX2rRM1ZVziZ/WG2awZ+B8UzCvXe6y8eGAOy7mGS8uMleoR8Ygaeg4Edbk+UEPRGMjMUlHZBBDkkPLf7cif6cH4Dmk7x0VytmTKIQvxl3NxqI/iIfV9MTYzvhDEBzKiYSyi1aG6Xygin28U81JGkHDtXnhWWdKp5W+k107W8cmyi8BjHiBFU+ZGqyiQb1tjFfGEHzsjjrW0corEOLu8doiBl+ZzAP04zyARyk1X3udYirVvKHRbe7M9D1yOFPSKp9Vfozmj+mxPRh0JJfo9EYyMvgUfEK+hw5BqbBRr6z6Rw8qmYnP8zxm4qbKhzW8GKKg1CDZT18GDgYpoO3Mmh9FQo4v5171NNoKWfkHNwo7xJMWSKPzRmiUpNdtmKPlxkl80Qw8jgK14okAPaXHUM9r8feMLzidVuk5ScB9+M6LeSFPrJRgX1FlgMJ0capeN0YgDg95gecAoNDHrFFiRRanefVJZLnUhT1Oxxbt57E9raPCApjm/L6OM7WBdSBC0RCZLFCynqz6si3zL5Vh4/hVjUfqsxT3igUuxWC2qHXh0eTNCfZoxieXNwQnFKVOLoiphc5DKF+/PPp8gCPzV/gN8+8FHPuuCjG88dqv0IiwJvVEXoyvdyuonf0qWegvMGxbrXuJ23aQvBCii+ID1lugh3IXFjIpz4agM65BmFjU0blbs4pKcHYyrzW/iFYlEnAl26WCmDBiRgUQzvlv3aBxZ+DOA7VM0+KrA9XmQkcNcmZ2hJgy4VOlROeuHIptzt/N3n3StvW4+vEWLqYuOPupdzAmF2VrIbuRRHlI5Zr3RRJf6hqhR4voCZ3dd9/8LT/J2G35GW6coGRYI7HDZpqW761XTDyCMf2MTn1F5Z/FL22KfBsBM8/JG2TA74DzBrHlM2P92OU8Kq8NnnTXDRS/4Z4c6l+GQ6cKXPA/fdJHDHEricLQdhM06v9Af77hYlMzF3ecv3rpjubewL+MwgWpS4E0UJvTKJ/NMQTj0uCNK7kfyEuHDPL2Tqy/iwmvipiplX7UOJ/n2W3jWzvq3GuUfFAmPXZ2JcZ1JOTqO1SXyg4xLZez2oIMY/gIWQKrHMLYMivGxbIf6LKI6EQrJIZAumKvpBdnt2H70Ex2Z8Vc2xC7n7JHs46wTOUy7zU9A8bM5owZBiXBM8juMXaMktzjTGkpJlhj4oOn6GrPC71q7Yams8A6WvVRSiAZKUkzrWEe5S4uUhitpUpEYW8BXEsN72TRJmnrYvE57UF8JF5nq9MVmRBDkqpmnp5qli/KkORpdstq38hfF0lh+2WEzIGUR9ZOCJCKc/25TO4bWxoHrzBaSVxMCLMUqyt1sbag+8cTre4nQbnCEjmb7W3RwPaj0YJrxfL0UUheaGp3M8ZuLrBaY81ntKOOMKxQtRg0hGN1n26XJEdGBW++XIbc6/JV+ss4zT7/bhUeKb4fDm42fzoBzo6lVkfbZ05rmpYZSqkpexUDbl2f2NK55vT9jPVZ7XhaPhnWokCosgjpKJ6DUhvSk8A+7cD6KvDpWgss1tHDTMGarCp7OAGvLG8GU4280fSuleEudiSMNvEpae5jSjKabC3anpO2qV8lvroz3uQlbMNlbxa5ruS7FF0BzslTudsYDpcXi7eLH6UW9SeQAAdb8YPl5kKqSyTfaN5aNFcB5zxnMzIWOjlPXYY4lSvnG60pt/jupfWiVYndts7rpxq+7pcn1bUFwlXHvj6IuXhX5r/orymyuQr6td6fPleJwEEov4E+W1K3Ftuc69+rtOtMOGVr2idtUkTkBepMJdjLbsV3izt+tvajrw/0UytCmcgj8VbXjxLij9w096Eg4BL7LKo3mj/99HXDUekXzgBMEaJOb9BacVjLQHa1uAvc33+DpDrXsyT8Sj8EE+DdDV3CBhdM+JqUmVbvQEjViKeoT1nKExwKuh19o3G0fy+GRGAE=" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "**Conflict identified:**\n\nThe operational account requires that \"the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal,\" but the target design severs that connection.\n\nSpecifically:\n- The target releases the reviewer immediately on `RecordRejection`\n- The target's `AppealSubmitted` carries no association with the original reviewer\n\nThese two decisions together would leave no way for the original reviewer—who is no longer reserved and has no stored link to the case—to answer appeal questions. The operation requires the reviewer to remain reachable during the appeal window; the target requires them to be untracked after rejection.\n\n**Stop:** Do you intend for the original reviewer to be contactable during appeals?" + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2589, + "output": 664, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3253, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0025889999999999997, + "output": 0.0033200000000000005, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005909 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 510 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284331014, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8MpTS4ES3PDfWtXjBc", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0TRZVZNWG2DJVMZWVTKTN", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TRYVH3FZAJ47G91G7YEF", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TRZNF8V474RG33KWKT4D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:56.663Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0TRZVZNWG2DJVMZWVTKTN", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to review an operational account against a target description and identify the first consequential action/discrepancy. Let me break down what's stated:\n\n**Operational account:**\n1. A reviewer is reserved while checking a request\n2. Recording approval releases that reviewer\n3. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal\n4. The original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal\n5. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review\n\n**Target description (what the net is supposed to do):**\n1. StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\n2. RecordApproval returns it\n3. RecordRejection also returns it immediately\n4. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer\n\nLet me compare these:\n\n1. \"Reviewer is reserved while checking\" vs \"StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\" - this aligns\n2. \"Recording approval releases that reviewer\" vs \"RecordApproval returns it\" - this aligns\n3. \"After rejection... requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions\" vs \"RecordRejection also returns it immediately\" and \"AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer\" - PROBLEM HERE\n\nThe operational account says:\n- After rejection, the requester can appeal\n- The ORIGINAL reviewer answers case questions during appeal\n- This implies the original reviewer must remain associated with the request/case through the appeal period\n\nThe target description says:\n- RecordRejection returns the reviewer immediately\n- AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer\n\nThis is a direct conflict. If the original reviewer is released immediately upon rejection, and if the appeal carries no association with the original reviewer, then there's no way for \"the original reviewer to answer case questions raised during an appeal\" as stated in the operational account.\n\nThe first consequential action is identifying this conflict: the target design would make it impossible to fulfill the requirement that the original reviewer answer questions during appeal, because the reviewer would be released and no longer associated with the request.\nI'll flag this discrepancy plainly, without fabricating a resolving rule or suggesting how to fix it.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "**Conflict identified:**\n\nThe operational account requires that \"the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal,\" but the target design severs that connection.\n\nSpecifically:\n- The target releases the reviewer immediately on `RecordRejection`\n- The target's `AppealSubmitted` carries no association with the original reviewer\n\nThese two decisions together would leave no way for the original reviewer—who is no longer reserved and has no stored link to the case—to answer appeal questions. The operation requires the reviewer to remain reachable during the appeal window; the target requires them to be untracked after rejection.\n\n**Stop:** Do you intend for the original reviewer to be contactable during appeals?" + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2589, + "output": 664, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3253, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0025889999999999997, + "output": 0.0033200000000000005, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005909 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 510 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284331014, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8MpTS4ES3PDfWtXjBc", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TRYVH3FZAJ47G91G7YEF", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TRZNF8V474RG33KWKT4D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:56.663Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user is asking me to review an operational account against a target description and identify the first consequential action/discrepancy. Let me break down what's stated:\n\n**Operational account:**\n1. A reviewer is reserved while checking a request\n2. Recording approval releases that reviewer\n3. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal\n4. The original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal\n5. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review\n\n**Target description (what the net is supposed to do):**\n1. StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\n2. RecordApproval returns it\n3. RecordRejection also returns it immediately\n4. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer\n\nLet me compare these:\n\n1. \"Reviewer is reserved while checking\" vs \"StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\" - this aligns\n2. \"Recording approval releases that reviewer\" vs \"RecordApproval returns it\" - this aligns\n3. \"After rejection... requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions\" vs \"RecordRejection also returns it immediately\" and \"AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer\" - PROBLEM HERE\n\nThe operational account says:\n- After rejection, the requester can appeal\n- The ORIGINAL reviewer answers case questions during appeal\n- This implies the original reviewer must remain associated with the request/case through the appeal period\n\nThe target description says:\n- RecordRejection returns the reviewer immediately\n- AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer\n\nThis is a direct conflict. If the original reviewer is released immediately upon rejection, and if the appeal carries no association with the original reviewer, then there's no way for \"the original reviewer to answer case questions raised during an appeal\" as stated in the operational account.\n\nThe first consequential action is identifying this conflict: the target design would make it impossible to fulfill the requirement that the original reviewer answer questions during appeal, because the reviewer would be released and no longer associated with the request.\nI'll flag this discrepancy plainly, without fabricating a resolving rule or suggesting how to fix it.", + "thinkingSignature": "EvcUCpoBCBEYAipAbp6nGTopv11v494Xb92rl5W7wqz+KSHfdvKpsuSjE6m+jq/NebTD/38J4VCCtQBsWECgFQaYDp46CN5e+8g3DjIZY2xhdWRlLWhhaWt1LTQtNS0yMDI1MTAwMTgAQgh0aGlua2luZ1okMWNiODRmYzQtNDdhYS00ZTFmLWE2NjUtOTQwYWI5ZjgxZjg4qAGwm9zUBhIMlYXP+cUMgTQSKQWSGgwdbO9HVB05mOPpHqUiMJWuFQNilTkCqez6Bov8pv0LUpAGSQDFmmen51Cq+gI01IVuJur5HghL7HE+HQ9OeiqJE1pi0LFWtKXM4xuXR3fiVw5KahcsWMTLNLLeFL3EfUhGkV1sqsndnfTFB1EoYDZ2MXqvqaZpflhzViCXlhP9VHOW+8mg1lk8c5vbynnH3qrxYqkxDP4uJPphRFTTxSZKMxI0KnPEtIdAdzkMZnyRJxN6f8Dk8otgOjFeOKo3I7cLJmz/gzxDd8m7MM6v9/lXJq9M0PZQSmiw6ERTeI97MkLu0QNCiXwvsWzyxUW0XPHigrz8VW0DuCvYnVQdoSLD6wo0HzwiC7n1q+xClhUSAdCULJB9RYVXQBNRV+qJQMUb/OElkv62UKEqVYMJWapDoyR9C2VLcY48PyppaumV7nb7FJJh+giJTz4yu/3NzYes9ov+H3jOJY3Q0SNctb8cjlHNGIQWgyQ4im42SFtmVbY3/JpwhGHEZ6N1MccIQ97uQ61JvAfMPDu1ztCFNzAAZdLfCZRDYFHbFuluZAuEm0lf4L31Y75kxwrfvUC3I/AbF04qT0K/tv/COEKleVOiB6ZtYE5AK1AXQNyuaKgQLvi4Fd/LsAO7XBCOBLnHSVZMppr8F6ZBqCudXcV519TEmBHS6H2OiUcd/tRGVaLpxh2kZq/C/LUCn6BUG49PThZ0zg8cptQemYOeLPDcTTi6MLHzPFkPdUrIDnsxdcg5ksI1I0L3yKVoxViq2ipAtvYkqbs+pt/joyBB84GUthDlsZjttVXverh5Ne/EZo4/2gXvr1XFHAJX2pZ7b2W7jTZ21PAaDD7uxW2ijOblUqxFY9ZbM997VcmucsjW9zzwIA8fbue6+VOggaB4mWulymTx4zYYdokYlFRA98mqFGXAl9/MxSzkUOXzSz54Zq5t3lYY9wokoPVLQIusB8t3C1aXyOSQX+xtXvCAo7EMhEcv0QmLQ79XLH8ps88DCvIQy1V2X9T/jLJoU06p9OluJf3cAVS8Q0S0NULi5JM3Lfh3ybc0jlQyPEfT7Lf3V1SSqnSHXYJk3O0/XTPWNWBkLL3IR1+65xtRWY0kVPCC/s2Ff9mzkfcyMtv36YGkiP+2BLQiTU76NS/oa4UbpBF8buKdGPlUnls82PWe8Olqxib6yChgcr2T7sqpFNt+hcTErnbGb3hRb+LzwQ74A32R+K09CbBdA8MS2BbfGRuXHHDpV+KWkQXDgQe48L6lH+xHK37nMlwJQjxszKuxDSNuqRy96BYs8/f1y2n+BgcLlm3pccqajZTXWR8EtToITGUtawO3CUb7kGQWBGylfo8OdijSgpeW9Y4xzGa6K8RPtzTbWGVxURL0R5KimhiGA6zYXINPjm/g+FpGEaX2rRM1ZVziZ/WG2awZ+B8UzCvXe6y8eGAOy7mGS8uMleoR8Ygaeg4Edbk+UEPRGMjMUlHZBBDkkPLf7cif6cH4Dmk7x0VytmTKIQvxl3NxqI/iIfV9MTYzvhDEBzKiYSyi1aG6Xygin28U81JGkHDtXnhWWdKp5W+k107W8cmyi8BjHiBFU+ZGqyiQb1tjFfGEHzsjjrW0corEOLu8doiBl+ZzAP04zyARyk1X3udYirVvKHRbe7M9D1yOFPSKp9Vfozmj+mxPRh0JJfo9EYyMvgUfEK+hw5BqbBRr6z6Rw8qmYnP8zxm4qbKhzW8GKKg1CDZT18GDgYpoO3Mmh9FQo4v5171NNoKWfkHNwo7xJMWSKPzRmiUpNdtmKPlxkl80Qw8jgK14okAPaXHUM9r8feMLzidVuk5ScB9+M6LeSFPrJRgX1FlgMJ0capeN0YgDg95gecAoNDHrFFiRRanefVJZLnUhT1Oxxbt57E9raPCApjm/L6OM7WBdSBC0RCZLFCynqz6si3zL5Vh4/hVjUfqsxT3igUuxWC2qHXh0eTNCfZoxieXNwQnFKVOLoiphc5DKF+/PPp8gCPzV/gN8+8FHPuuCjG88dqv0IiwJvVEXoyvdyuonf0qWegvMGxbrXuJ23aQvBCii+ID1lugh3IXFjIpz4agM65BmFjU0blbs4pKcHYyrzW/iFYlEnAl26WCmDBiRgUQzvlv3aBxZ+DOA7VM0+KrA9XmQkcNcmZ2hJgy4VOlROeuHIptzt/N3n3StvW4+vEWLqYuOPupdzAmF2VrIbuRRHlI5Zr3RRJf6hqhR4voCZ3dd9/8LT/J2G35GW6coGRYI7HDZpqW761XTDyCMf2MTn1F5Z/FL22KfBsBM8/JG2TA74DzBrHlM2P92OU8Kq8NnnTXDRS/4Z4c6l+GQ6cKXPA/fdJHDHEricLQdhM06v9Af77hYlMzF3ecv3rpjubewL+MwgWpS4E0UJvTKJ/NMQTj0uCNK7kfyEuHDPL2Tqy/iwmvipiplX7UOJ/n2W3jWzvq3GuUfFAmPXZ2JcZ1JOTqO1SXyg4xLZez2oIMY/gIWQKrHMLYMivGxbIf6LKI6EQrJIZAumKvpBdnt2H70Ex2Z8Vc2xC7n7JHs46wTOUy7zU9A8bM5owZBiXBM8juMXaMktzjTGkpJlhj4oOn6GrPC71q7Yams8A6WvVRSiAZKUkzrWEe5S4uUhitpUpEYW8BXEsN72TRJmnrYvE57UF8JF5nq9MVmRBDkqpmnp5qli/KkORpdstq38hfF0lh+2WEzIGUR9ZOCJCKc/25TO4bWxoHrzBaSVxMCLMUqyt1sbag+8cTre4nQbnCEjmb7W3RwPaj0YJrxfL0UUheaGp3M8ZuLrBaY81ntKOOMKxQtRg0hGN1n26XJEdGBW++XIbc6/JV+ss4zT7/bhUeKb4fDm42fzoBzo6lVkfbZ05rmpYZSqkpexUDbl2f2NK55vT9jPVZ7XhaPhnWokCosgjpKJ6DUhvSk8A+7cD6KvDpWgss1tHDTMGarCp7OAGvLG8GU4280fSuleEudiSMNvEpae5jSjKabC3anpO2qV8lvroz3uQlbMNlbxa5ruS7FF0BzslTudsYDpcXi7eLH6UW9SeQAAdb8YPl5kKqSyTfaN5aNFcB5zxnMzIWOjlPXYY4lSvnG60pt/jupfWiVYndts7rpxq+7pcn1bUFwlXHvj6IuXhX5r/orymyuQr6td6fPleJwEEov4E+W1K3Ftuc69+rtOtMOGVr2idtUkTkBepMJdjLbsV3izt+tvajrw/0UytCmcgj8VbXjxLij9w096Eg4BL7LKo3mj/99HXDUekXzgBMEaJOb9BacVjLQHa1uAvc33+DpDrXsyT8Sj8EE+DdDV3CBhdM+JqUmVbvQEjViKeoT1nKExwKuh19o3G0fy+GRGAE=" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "**Conflict identified:**\n\nThe operational account requires that \"the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal,\" but the target design severs that connection.\n\nSpecifically:\n- The target releases the reviewer immediately on `RecordRejection`\n- The target's `AppealSubmitted` carries no association with the original reviewer\n\nThese two decisions together would leave no way for the original reviewer—who is no longer reserved and has no stored link to the case—to answer appeal questions. The operation requires the reviewer to remain reachable during the appeal window; the target requires them to be untracked after rejection.\n\n**Stop:** Do you intend for the original reviewer to be contactable during appeals?" + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2589, + "output": 664, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3253, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0025889999999999997, + "output": 0.0033200000000000005, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005909 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 510 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284331014, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8MpTS4ES3PDfWtXjBc", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TRYVH3FZAJ47G91G7YEF", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TRZNF8V474RG33KWKT4D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:56.664Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TRZNF8V474RG33KWKT4D", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 5668, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TRYVH3FZAJ47G91G7YEF", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:56.665Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while checking a request. Recording approval releases that reviewer. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection also returns it immediately. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TRYVH3FZAJ47G91G7YEF", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TRZNF8V474RG33KWKT4D", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:56.665Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TRYSYQ70C2D2DR0D0AHW", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "b8f32a3fba85b41327ffb35934b3e42d2be5eb84d6e416786cba90ee55ec36e6", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:56.665Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "d2d42344c40ddeb2471eeeba437032079bd2c7083afdbc2f9de5e823f841d5b8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "ebec2ac5faab6cbbbe26eeeebc2d7ac0ba7dc637fd43ea9b5917f8e0277f5515", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "c7cb5b2222b0d1b5aff861c4056f41ba8825aca284ec774d8e4f0fbf12807314", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "321f8405c12374315d61caf466001d6b4b5cf68b04325df77a7948daaa680de1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/scenarios.json": "1844df940b8de9d10d28e9537f966920aba581b36956a9ac26a3767824ca96cb", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/protocol.md": "ef1443bb02c6c26d4ded6edf9e023579bc32cdc394f90490edfb34eaf32b8ed2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md": "8cd2749c8292f01045ab4282fc7248c07046cecaf14a586a9ef286e2876cf8bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md": "82b035268c07cc8ee4736b5ffdd392c8f153793d2ca6b9ed57271c9b6146de10", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md": "8826b85d32d6c24fbc8f678ec394600676ec61c4a0b83d0a9cfa16be87fc5d76", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "1a2417cc5f9649d459c5efbc87cd3242db99a9717622a6d86073c72835818865" + }, + "promptSelection": { + "candidateCorePromptIncluded": true, + "v3SdcpnAppendIncluded": true, + "legacyCorePromptIncluded": false, + "legacyRoleMarkerIncluded": false, + "initialSystemPromptSha256": "2156970b82b41d6893d08177fad8127a336be4afb5fd0bb184a52a7f63878fb8" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "candidateCorePrompt": "6a458c0bbbc9dee5b4454a54b032818227ab681ba9f7beaa60d4fe9628f6eb41", + "v3SdcpnAppend": "73cac46487d33051a90cc487ea7abfc11fec4b049af11a108396ec08d44569fb", + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S4-packaged-r1.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S4-packaged-r1.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..88a25ddb1dd --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/runs/paid/S4-packaged-r1.json @@ -0,0 +1,1177 @@ +{ + "runId": "flue-skill-composition-v3-packaged-s4-1993d8f1", + "phase": "paid", + "instrumentVersion": "v3", + "candidate": "packaged", + "scenarioId": "S4", + "scenario": { + "title": "Review exposing an implicit human-knowledge gap", + "prompt": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while checking a request. Recording approval releases that reviewer. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection also returns it immediately. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer.", + "stopAfter": "One focused question exposing the unresolved appeal and reviewer-availability relationship.", + "expected": "Load universal and SDCPN elicitation judgment, then ask whether appeal responsibility keeps the original reviewer unavailable for new reviews or permits concurrent assignment." + }, + "model": "anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5", + "firstConsequentialOutput": "**Consequential conflict identified:**\n\nThe operational account requires that the original reviewer remain associated with an appeal to answer case questions raised during the appeal process. The target description explicitly *severs* this association by having AppealSubmitted carry only the request token.\n\n**Source evidence:**\n\n- *Operational:* \"After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal.\"\n- *Target:* \"AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer.\"\n\nThis is not a matter of omission or implementation choice—it is a direct contradiction. The operation cannot fulfill its stated requirement (original reviewer answers appeal questions) if that reviewer's identity is not carried forward or retrievable.\n\n**Action needed:** Resolve whether the target should preserve the reviewer association for appeals, or whether the operational requirement to have the original reviewer answer appeal questions should be removed or reassigned.", + "catalogEntries": ["sdcpn-modelling"], + "activatedSkills": [], + "toolCalls": [], + "readOutputs": [], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 7331, + "inputTokens": 2537, + "outputTokens": 687, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 3224, + "cost": 0.005972 + } + ], + "totals": { + "durationMs": 7331, + "inputTokens": 2537, + "outputTokens": 687, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 3224, + "cost": 0.005972 + }, + "transcript": "## User\nReview the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while checking a request. Recording approval releases that reviewer. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection also returns it immediately. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer.\n\n## Assistant\n**Consequential conflict identified:**\n\nThe operational account requires that the original reviewer remain associated with an appeal to answer case questions raised during the appeal process. The target description explicitly *severs* this association by having AppealSubmitted carry only the request token.\n\n**Source evidence:**\n\n- *Operational:* \"After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal.\"\n- *Target:* \"AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer.\"\n\nThis is not a matter of omission or implementation choice—it is a direct contradiction. The operation cannot fulfill its stated requirement (original reviewer answers appeal questions) if that reviewer's identity is not carried forward or retrievable.\n\n**Action needed:** Resolve whether the target should preserve the reviewer association for appeals, or whether the operational requirement to have the original reviewer answer appeal questions should be removed or reassigned.", + "snapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000017", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFGMFRIOTI5R1daSlAyNUJOSDdWR1Na", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while checking a request. Recording approval releases that reviewer. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection also returns it immediately. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1F0TJ6VNM0CPPCM7MQJEQ6G", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The user wants me to review an operational account against a target description, stopping after the first consequential action. They specifically ask me not to invent operational rules or mutate a net.\n\nLet me parse both:\n\n**Operational account:**\n1. A reviewer is reserved while checking a request\n2. Recording approval releases that reviewer\n3. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal\n4. The original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal\n5. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review\n\n**Target description:**\n1. StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\n2. RecordApproval returns it\n3. RecordRejection also returns it immediately\n4. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer\n\nNow let me compare these:\n\nPoint 1 (operational) vs Point 1 (target): Matches - reservation during check\nPoint 2 (operational) vs Point 2 (target): Matches - approval releases reviewer\nPoint 3 (operational) vs Point 3 (target): Matches - rejection returns reviewer immediately\nPoint 4 (operational) vs Point 5 (target): The operational account says \"A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review\" - target doesn't address this but that's a constraint, not conflicting\nPoint 3 & 4 (operational) vs Point 4 (target): HERE IS THE ISSUE\n\nThe operational account says:\n- After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal\n- The original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal\n\nThe target description says:\n- AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer\n\nThis is a **consequential conflict**. The operational account requires that the original reviewer be associated with appeals (to answer questions), but the target explicitly severs that association by having AppealSubmitted carry only the request token.\nThis is where I stop and flag the discrepancy rather than pushing further. My task is limited to surfacing this mismatch clearly, not resolving it, inventing new rules to reconcile it, or altering the underlying net structure.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "**Consequential conflict identified:**\n\nThe operational account requires that the original reviewer remain associated with an appeal to answer case questions raised during the appeal process. The target description explicitly *severs* this association by having AppealSubmitted carry only the request token.\n\n**Source evidence:**\n\n- *Operational:* \"After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal.\"\n- *Target:* \"AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer.\"\n\nThis is not a matter of omission or implementation choice—it is a direct contradiction. The operation cannot fulfill its stated requirement (original reviewer answers appeal questions) if that reviewer's identity is not carried forward or retrievable.\n\n**Action needed:** Resolve whether the target should preserve the reviewer association for appeals, or whether the operational requirement to have the original reviewer answer appeal questions should be removed or reassigned.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1F0TH9324NC5VDH3QXDJ539" + }, + "observations": [ + { + "type": "submission_queued", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "kind": "direct", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:43.108Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_running", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "kind": "direct", + "attemptCount": 1, + "maxAttempts": 10, + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 0, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:43.110Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation_start", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 1, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:43.131Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_start", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 2, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:43.136Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_start", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "purpose": "agent", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 3, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:43.137Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_request", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "purpose": "agent", + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium", + "input": { + "systemPrompt": "# Universal Elicitation\n\nYou are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select.\n\n## Purpose-relative attention\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category.\n\n## Interaction\n\nUse the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame.\n\n## Authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them.\n\n## Target transformation and evidence\n\nKeep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct.\n\n## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery\n\nMaintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible.\n\n## Extension contract\n\nTarget-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants.\n\n# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN\n\nSpecialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece.\n\nActivate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact.\n\nDuring interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish.\n\nUse mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead.\n\nWhen the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing.\n\nCall ping when you need to confirm the server tool path.\nA client-tool-result signal is JSON [{ toolCallId, toolName, output }]. Treat output as the browser's result for that call and continue helping the user.\n\n## Available Skills\n\nThe following skills provide specialized instructions for specific tasks. When a task matches a skill description, call the `activate_skill` tool with that skill name before proceeding so its full instructions are loaded. Skill instructions and supporting resources stay lazy until activation or explicit file reads.\n\n- **sdcpn-modelling** — Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact.\n\n## Available Agents\n\nNone. No subagents are currently declared, so the `task` tool has no valid `agent` value — do not call it unless an agent is introduced later in the conversation.\n\nDate: Tue, Sep 1, 2026", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while checking a request. Recording approval releases that reviewer. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection also returns it immediately. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer." + } + ] + } + ], + "tools": [ + { + "name": "task", + "description": "Delegate a focused task to a detached child agent with its own context. Use this for independent research, file exploration, or parallel work. Pass attachment IDs shown in the conversation to include those images. The task returns only its final answer to this conversation. Agents available for delegation are listed under \"Available Agents\" in the system prompt.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["prompt", "agent"], + "properties": { + "description": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Short human-readable label for the delegated work", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "prompt": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Focused instructions for the child agent", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "agent": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1, + "description": "Subagent to run the task with, from the list of currently available agents. Agents that have been removed from the list are no longer usable (until re-introduced, if ever).", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "cwd": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Working directory for the child agent. AGENTS.md and skills are discovered from here.", + "~kind": "String", + "~optional": true + }, + "attachments": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["id"], + "properties": { + "id": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Attachment ID shown in the current conversation", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + }, + "description": "Images from this conversation to include in the child agent prompt", + "~kind": "Array", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "activate_skill", + "description": "Load the full instructions for one available skill before performing work that matches its description. Supporting resources remain lazy until explicitly read.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["name"], + "properties": { + "name": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Name of the skill to activate", + "~kind": "String" + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "read_skill_resource", + "description": "Read a packaged skill supporting file by its advertised path.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "required": ["path"], + "properties": { + "path": { + "type": "string", + "description": "Path to the file to read", + "~kind": "String" + }, + "offset": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Line number to start from (1-indexed)", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + }, + "limit": { + "type": "number", + "description": "Maximum number of lines to read", + "~kind": "Number", + "~optional": true + } + }, + "~kind": "Object" + } + }, + { + "name": "readPetrinautDoc", + "description": "Read one page of the Petrinaut user guide. The browser executes this tool. After you call it, wait for a client-tool-result signal carrying the page text, then continue from that text.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "doc": { + "enum": [ + "drawing-a-net", + "petri-net-extensions", + "useful-patterns", + "simulation", + "scenarios", + "experiments", + "optimization", + "actual-mode", + "ai-assistant", + "visual-settings", + "examples" + ], + "type": "string" + } + }, + "required": ["doc"] + } + }, + { + "name": "ping", + "description": "Return a short server-side acknowledgement. Call this when you need to confirm the server is in the loop.", + "parameters": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "note": { + "type": "string", + "minLength": 1 + } + }, + "required": [] + } + } + ] + } + }, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 4, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:43.137Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_start", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": { + "input": 0, + "output": 0, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0 + } + }, + "stopReason": "pending", + "timestamp": 1788284323147 + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 5, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:44.060Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_start", + "contentIndex": 0, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 6, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:44.062Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "The", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 7, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:45.067Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " user wants me to", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 8, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:45.067Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " review an", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 9, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:45.067Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " operational account against a", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 10, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:45.068Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " target description,", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 11, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:45.068Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " stopping", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 12, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:45.068Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " after the first consequential action. They specifically ask me not to invent operational rules or mutate a net.\n\nLet me parse both:\n\n**", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 13, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:45.068Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "Operational account:**\n1. A reviewer is reserved while checking a request\n2. Recording approval releases that reviewer\n3. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal\n4. The original reviewer", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 14, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:45.068Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " answers case questions raised during an appeal\n5. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review\n\n**Target description:**\n1. StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\n2. RecordAp", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 15, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:46.143Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "proval returns it\n3. RecordRejection also returns it immediately\n4. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer\n\nNow let me compare these:\n\nPoint", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 16, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:46.143Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " 1 (operational) vs Point 1 (target): Matches - reservation during check\nPoint 2 (operational) vs Point 2 (target", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 17, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:46.143Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "): Matches - approval releases reviewer\nPoint 3 (operational) vs Point 3 (target): Matches - rejection returns reviewer immediately\nPoint 4 (operational) vs Point 5 (target):", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 18, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:46.143Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " The operational account says \"A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review\" - target doesn't address this but that", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 19, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:47.417Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "'s a constraint, not conflicting\nPoint 3 & 4 (operational) vs Point 4 (target): HERE IS THE ISSUE\n\nThe operational", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 20, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:47.417Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " account says:\n- After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal\n- The original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal\n\nThe target description says:\n- AppealSubmitted carries only the request token", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 21, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:47.417Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " and retains no association with the original reviewer\n\nThis is a **consequential conflict**. The operational account requires that the original reviewer be", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 22, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:47.417Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " associated with appeals (to answer questions), but the target explicitly severs that association by having AppealSubmitted carry", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 23, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:48.592Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " only the request token.\n", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 24, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:48.592Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": "This", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 25, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:50.294Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " is where I stop and flag the discrepancy rather than pushing further. My task is limited to surfacing this", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 26, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:50.294Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_delta", + "contentIndex": 0, + "delta": " mismatch clearly, not resolving it, inventing new rules to reconcile it, or altering the underlying net structure.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 27, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:50.379Z" + }, + { + "type": "thinking_end", + "contentIndex": 0, + "content": "The user wants me to review an operational account against a target description, stopping after the first consequential action. They specifically ask me not to invent operational rules or mutate a net.\n\nLet me parse both:\n\n**Operational account:**\n1. A reviewer is reserved while checking a request\n2. Recording approval releases that reviewer\n3. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal\n4. The original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal\n5. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review\n\n**Target description:**\n1. StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\n2. RecordApproval returns it\n3. RecordRejection also returns it immediately\n4. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer\n\nNow let me compare these:\n\nPoint 1 (operational) vs Point 1 (target): Matches - reservation during check\nPoint 2 (operational) vs Point 2 (target): Matches - approval releases reviewer\nPoint 3 (operational) vs Point 3 (target): Matches - rejection returns reviewer immediately\nPoint 4 (operational) vs Point 5 (target): The operational account says \"A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review\" - target doesn't address this but that's a constraint, not conflicting\nPoint 3 & 4 (operational) vs Point 4 (target): HERE IS THE ISSUE\n\nThe operational account says:\n- After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal\n- The original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal\n\nThe target description says:\n- AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer\n\nThis is a **consequential conflict**. The operational account requires that the original reviewer be associated with appeals (to answer questions), but the target explicitly severs that association by having AppealSubmitted carry only the request token.\nThis is where I stop and flag the discrepancy rather than pushing further. My task is limited to surfacing this mismatch clearly, not resolving it, inventing new rules to reconcile it, or altering the underlying net structure.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 28, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:50.380Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "**Consequ", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 29, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:50.449Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": "ential conflict identified:**\n\nThe operational account requires that the original reviewer remain associated with an appeal to answer case questions raised during the appeal process. The target description explicitly *severs* this association", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 30, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:50.449Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " by having AppealSubmitted carry only the request token.\n\n**Source evidence:**\n\n- *Operational:* \"After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 31, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:50.449Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal.\"\n- *Target:* \"AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer.\"\n\nThis is", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 32, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:50.449Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " not a matter of omission or implementation choice—it is a direct contradiction. The operation cannot", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 33, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:50.449Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " fulfill its stated requirement (original reviewer answers appeal questions) if that reviewer's identity is not", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 34, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:50.449Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " carried forward or retrievable.\n\n**Action needed:** Resolve whether the target should preserve the reviewer association for appeals, or whether the operational", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 35, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:50.449Z" + }, + { + "type": "text_delta", + "text": " requirement to have the original reviewer answer appeal questions should be removed or reassigned.", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 36, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:50.449Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "purpose": "agent", + "durationMs": 7331, + "request": { + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "requestedModel": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "serverAddress": "api.anthropic.com", + "reasoningLevel": "medium" + }, + "response": { + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8MF41PeMjAT7zxyU9x", + "output": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants me to review an operational account against a target description, stopping after the first consequential action. They specifically ask me not to invent operational rules or mutate a net.\n\nLet me parse both:\n\n**Operational account:**\n1. A reviewer is reserved while checking a request\n2. Recording approval releases that reviewer\n3. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal\n4. The original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal\n5. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review\n\n**Target description:**\n1. StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\n2. RecordApproval returns it\n3. RecordRejection also returns it immediately\n4. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer\n\nNow let me compare these:\n\nPoint 1 (operational) vs Point 1 (target): Matches - reservation during check\nPoint 2 (operational) vs Point 2 (target): Matches - approval releases reviewer\nPoint 3 (operational) vs Point 3 (target): Matches - rejection returns reviewer immediately\nPoint 4 (operational) vs Point 5 (target): The operational account says \"A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review\" - target doesn't address this but that's a constraint, not conflicting\nPoint 3 & 4 (operational) vs Point 4 (target): HERE IS THE ISSUE\n\nThe operational account says:\n- After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal\n- The original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal\n\nThe target description says:\n- AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer\n\nThis is a **consequential conflict**. The operational account requires that the original reviewer be associated with appeals (to answer questions), but the target explicitly severs that association by having AppealSubmitted carry only the request token.\nThis is where I stop and flag the discrepancy rather than pushing further. My task is limited to surfacing this mismatch clearly, not resolving it, inventing new rules to reconcile it, or altering the underlying net structure.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "**Consequential conflict identified:**\n\nThe operational account requires that the original reviewer remain associated with an appeal to answer case questions raised during the appeal process. The target description explicitly *severs* this association by having AppealSubmitted carry only the request token.\n\n**Source evidence:**\n\n- *Operational:* \"After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal.\"\n- *Target:* \"AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer.\"\n\nThis is not a matter of omission or implementation choice—it is a direct contradiction. The operation cannot fulfill its stated requirement (original reviewer answers appeal questions) if that reviewer's identity is not carried forward or retrievable.\n\n**Action needed:** Resolve whether the target should preserve the reviewer association for appeals, or whether the operational requirement to have the original reviewer answer appeal questions should be removed or reassigned." + } + ] + }, + "usage": { + "input": 2537, + "output": 687, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3224, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0025369999999999998, + "output": 0.003435, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005972 + } + }, + "finishReason": "stop" + }, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 37, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:50.468Z" + }, + { + "type": "message_end", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants me to review an operational account against a target description, stopping after the first consequential action. They specifically ask me not to invent operational rules or mutate a net.\n\nLet me parse both:\n\n**Operational account:**\n1. A reviewer is reserved while checking a request\n2. Recording approval releases that reviewer\n3. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal\n4. The original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal\n5. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review\n\n**Target description:**\n1. StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\n2. RecordApproval returns it\n3. RecordRejection also returns it immediately\n4. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer\n\nNow let me compare these:\n\nPoint 1 (operational) vs Point 1 (target): Matches - reservation during check\nPoint 2 (operational) vs Point 2 (target): Matches - approval releases reviewer\nPoint 3 (operational) vs Point 3 (target): Matches - rejection returns reviewer immediately\nPoint 4 (operational) vs Point 5 (target): The operational account says \"A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review\" - target doesn't address this but that's a constraint, not conflicting\nPoint 3 & 4 (operational) vs Point 4 (target): HERE IS THE ISSUE\n\nThe operational account says:\n- After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal\n- The original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal\n\nThe target description says:\n- AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer\n\nThis is a **consequential conflict**. The operational account requires that the original reviewer be associated with appeals (to answer questions), but the target explicitly severs that association by having AppealSubmitted carry only the request token.\nThis is where I stop and flag the discrepancy rather than pushing further. My task is limited to surfacing this mismatch clearly, not resolving it, inventing new rules to reconcile it, or altering the underlying net structure.", + "thinkingSignature": "EtwSCpoBCBEYAipAa6oIafVVagYc8PtD7ijVMmCUPWTXM6LJwbGYpJnywpEHbqEVrmJ82xG2pb/CmLuMNUdRnj/PiUHqReKp2GFBnTIZY2xhdWRlLWhhaWt1LTQtNS0yMDI1MTAwMTgAQgh0aGlua2luZ1okMWNiODRmYzQtNDdhYS00ZTFmLWE2NjUtOTQwYWI5ZjgxZjg4qAGqm9zUBhIMPEH5gOLS9bnEK9VmGgxLkd1mP2OzU0Ux4A4iMMqj708BSa9MKxMMCLuC7kupYTZZlycE2FdxU9QdjOLGC4tcSyCAtuQYEjPfVjC8LiruEBt1PieEcxVedVFPzVUvv7s7XK7O8XAUSOT1xhxiIopecFJpBOERwuG5DM1EEdePS06dhvt2n5B0gc2/5d1kOTKw1uG91G2n5AIxjyzwuVVVXUn5rs4P6vUf4ZIAMquPe4qAWxYebLUwyjHQRIJqeot2MzolBlAmyQYUFyPjZwrFpPHMtmJ1trSv23Y0z2NxHkJu38ggwI2oH8z11BGfk1QuMKRDgoiKhexDPmoFwqksJ2sbxrz+k0MlHfN44FbF7Gpl7TgUbsuptOxY0sD4R5dNPfwLLL6WUMTvqWzE9SryO7FQmtSPMi+RC6VLn77x2YTm6udLIg+clxP4o/qmcqrPLrIS07STfVgl9iJDhB8pWn8eAz0IwCQ3sUvja4G0aISKB02gNHNKX5oA3XgqC0WselWXGz+5TUh/S7eK6rMiCGTJpjuXaYmrK94lLG3jhfVSJ5/cX3DA95UJKEptNM6Pxh6Lv95bSb1H+qe8Wd6jLb98VcG6QycSLkF1upWHjcocCNl6IR0rLwDaM369SkySQo4wC4cVDVT6JESt5TPOavy9LwoZBjhI1/ihJWoUjYBMJFPCWpxiA9Z5nDua+GMI/wEDzTnkD3sD1pD4qWteS2JZzD2v+xl6TBpuAdhti/tm737vXzsJC0iIEzt7+dyH2VE97tAZYXKWuvPVWJ4nCYuptwPhoQYRaspKlRA2Vm3ocPxS1SHN+Aj+wLeC1OcYhVBqrwfAqDIOdM51WKc+NKHlZpjfKMsBnmZ8EECZXAWUrFwQvtPnR++3n+60pXh2oxlvemkLKd/5NC/CDa45ty6UzjgsLtGK4qYa1JQQXR2+qfc6cAKF7weWvpk0aKj05aMtmPG6yiju6QHktcj/WJctk2KsEcYXLGD96bI/XDwW0nymSD7AJ0VVVZ49dHrFkCTl8r6qH79/3bjym4Iw4WHzWcKm7CAe07aDQ76Wad5HQcSiMdAMtAcuT45DEDXr0/dF8kLjHm+KpRink0iJNSSH8yRF0JyACjgh02CM0bX1eJEXN4PBg3xEFL8B7VdlEy0RcMm7lcyGWavlJZbzF0jfnqiYsIZGNHVJFsNR+v0a6b84ODttYOAQt634aXAYAC/OzdJrJv6bPkcP9+jcftQmr6PjChjnJtC44M4VAl7SemGcO30s5n78Dtk8b58Qa+Fft/pBGrAtK2zMcuovDrgX5Yx0QKx40T5N4H/75rUVwh910C2Tp7Iv/+JCYsLiXQQW4wH4BKPXGsZOfe7MUOl5xzo2TK8Vd9wRwGWkO3qGPEyZqNe1h5AU45cr55W3UpKKXHuyVbeXiwQFbGD0mUU4VZ52j3uQNzcDWMg6RQJUzrm5bWB8jkKR1k/C1HDwS9D/cYboPFK7Mpe9TvbCC6LLtja9dI/pf3ERu4xz7EOEoCINNIFxgVCrrQi31MYkuOsUc/fArSHtqIm9CGvFJ9w9Ydn4i0V/mbRYrIY7JtrrGSy8NjynEpnGMlZBijGH6yc23uhOPyVymbDo4HmoQ9qBUDvApzihzCGulx+hKWbVEFLor02DLBfR5bVRsTrlkQOcn5wSIwe6VRSCNvo3oXrfPZhcxq1cLQ+QrUQDGlRveoNsyH+ACyVH8u1+VFt2f+lADautcNrDz4xCBYVrK3yndmZZ4HsY8YtCSyQrX8UY44F934oNEBD4Wa2sxXQ487DhSDSQOfAnNZepKtKoGke7B3GOVMdJt/SYb6QORbA5kQym//KQ6JIAIYmqUzGxu2NVgVJX3P9H+cjrY5rQuy6TfNhZhE+CkNwwq/0GnPIP1fsrLCmAMDBsbXRHE2svqqguU2JPSZdMZIqsp2MKLv3s4o5nqWkjCGHcihXeftDXnRQPg2VyW5oPWNtNMTisWx2LaJ0KWs3PEJKZ/N5vZvDAvdc9NeKhL1ZEddFvhTDYH91YroR0ZYIxjPA4K+IXaFzehJW7hz9yVETOqTl8ArkMu/pem14gomOujCcBZjxqvAfuwYHgNJyMtrLE7a7UDXcIGEllaAAY5bsUQ4/NX43mzDsONrfq7L1YAm25KWXzAEXOML6bue0py/9jRqY+1m3hyYwxYsh5Hri5VOeA+WtaFpFhaSzsRf/70w7YOAov0bzROaFzEoDaOZusKST0iXJVHvlg3XYRrTM0B4iZaLttaS9vnvmatsWnqPPAT2hIyhO+5p56ai0MSHNvkRfAl6SJr+wf5dhWz8Vtf1lt5EzPZqwfvBws1WnR4W0Yv7EYppayktWdwhjDQlszFdPN3fXw2qdtqU+Q07ww6X1rkbYR5G6WmUXi50xSC2TOgqiLYvr3OvDnvSqYmhLuAt5aS7ykgf6611cgPZn0cINrE2f09xZro0HSG0ZfcCD0oUE9nNfS/yqWbf+NlngcE6sjbnN3VTkC5lGWiTM03VA3T5+P/HBf1bX3KT9sYRn1VMMm+NOq1855x6OpV8nkq3ePek/FvheznxLVlPNbhdt9lKOnQ6mh93CNFPOYT+gihWAUWS/ehqBUJ9fhBetUgcT6UlSL/RaWMY9hjBML8EPMqJHoDGf/uHyxHTy8RSnCL+fdOn0zbCgo/D1tpDe7jXKKUKlBzrPcYhzEM5azCSinz8rrCaI3UgVI8k3km+nCwJX9bMqnSZddV4T5l3VAxNKuLsbuqbkAdYHGGFArwAldnFLZDwPCyuVFT958S9YkerCKzcFWPCKRuiqIVeb0duGsA4EuiKIwyRSeIftrmjzMW1lbwpnojMucBi8k39tG3h7Xqn0vZ4X2U11eTnj3TkE7KeODVxLMuvLFnpmQjPgiri+qKTKnJq1ZmF3qDOFAfggtyUmuIyAd3OOJu/OXio+EDWveUlo2ersBRrAQqa56q9EIWnbQnr+4qUQgO0IYAQ==" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "**Consequential conflict identified:**\n\nThe operational account requires that the original reviewer remain associated with an appeal to answer case questions raised during the appeal process. The target description explicitly *severs* this association by having AppealSubmitted carry only the request token.\n\n**Source evidence:**\n\n- *Operational:* \"After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal.\"\n- *Target:* \"AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer.\"\n\nThis is not a matter of omission or implementation choice—it is a direct contradiction. The operation cannot fulfill its stated requirement (original reviewer answers appeal questions) if that reviewer's identity is not carried forward or retrievable.\n\n**Action needed:** Resolve whether the target should preserve the reviewer association for appeals, or whether the operational requirement to have the original reviewer answer appeal questions should be removed or reassigned." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2537, + "output": 687, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3224, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0025369999999999998, + "output": 0.003435, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005972 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 480 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284323147, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8MF41PeMjAT7zxyU9x", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 38, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:50.468Z" + }, + { + "type": "turn_messages", + "turnId": "turn_01M1F0THA176T9ZVT37M27ME8J", + "purpose": "agent", + "message": { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants me to review an operational account against a target description, stopping after the first consequential action. They specifically ask me not to invent operational rules or mutate a net.\n\nLet me parse both:\n\n**Operational account:**\n1. A reviewer is reserved while checking a request\n2. Recording approval releases that reviewer\n3. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal\n4. The original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal\n5. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review\n\n**Target description:**\n1. StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\n2. RecordApproval returns it\n3. RecordRejection also returns it immediately\n4. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer\n\nNow let me compare these:\n\nPoint 1 (operational) vs Point 1 (target): Matches - reservation during check\nPoint 2 (operational) vs Point 2 (target): Matches - approval releases reviewer\nPoint 3 (operational) vs Point 3 (target): Matches - rejection returns reviewer immediately\nPoint 4 (operational) vs Point 5 (target): The operational account says \"A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review\" - target doesn't address this but that's a constraint, not conflicting\nPoint 3 & 4 (operational) vs Point 4 (target): HERE IS THE ISSUE\n\nThe operational account says:\n- After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal\n- The original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal\n\nThe target description says:\n- AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer\n\nThis is a **consequential conflict**. The operational account requires that the original reviewer be associated with appeals (to answer questions), but the target explicitly severs that association by having AppealSubmitted carry only the request token.\nThis is where I stop and flag the discrepancy rather than pushing further. My task is limited to surfacing this mismatch clearly, not resolving it, inventing new rules to reconcile it, or altering the underlying net structure.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "**Consequential conflict identified:**\n\nThe operational account requires that the original reviewer remain associated with an appeal to answer case questions raised during the appeal process. The target description explicitly *severs* this association by having AppealSubmitted carry only the request token.\n\n**Source evidence:**\n\n- *Operational:* \"After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal.\"\n- *Target:* \"AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer.\"\n\nThis is not a matter of omission or implementation choice—it is a direct contradiction. The operation cannot fulfill its stated requirement (original reviewer answers appeal questions) if that reviewer's identity is not carried forward or retrievable.\n\n**Action needed:** Resolve whether the target should preserve the reviewer association for appeals, or whether the operational requirement to have the original reviewer answer appeal questions should be removed or reassigned." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2537, + "output": 687, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3224, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0025369999999999998, + "output": 0.003435, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005972 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 480 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284323147, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8MF41PeMjAT7zxyU9x", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + }, + "toolResults": [], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 39, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:50.468Z" + }, + { + "type": "agent_end", + "messages": [ + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": [ + { + "type": "thinking", + "thinking": "The user wants me to review an operational account against a target description, stopping after the first consequential action. They specifically ask me not to invent operational rules or mutate a net.\n\nLet me parse both:\n\n**Operational account:**\n1. A reviewer is reserved while checking a request\n2. Recording approval releases that reviewer\n3. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal\n4. The original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal\n5. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review\n\n**Target description:**\n1. StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token\n2. RecordApproval returns it\n3. RecordRejection also returns it immediately\n4. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer\n\nNow let me compare these:\n\nPoint 1 (operational) vs Point 1 (target): Matches - reservation during check\nPoint 2 (operational) vs Point 2 (target): Matches - approval releases reviewer\nPoint 3 (operational) vs Point 3 (target): Matches - rejection returns reviewer immediately\nPoint 4 (operational) vs Point 5 (target): The operational account says \"A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review\" - target doesn't address this but that's a constraint, not conflicting\nPoint 3 & 4 (operational) vs Point 4 (target): HERE IS THE ISSUE\n\nThe operational account says:\n- After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal\n- The original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal\n\nThe target description says:\n- AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer\n\nThis is a **consequential conflict**. The operational account requires that the original reviewer be associated with appeals (to answer questions), but the target explicitly severs that association by having AppealSubmitted carry only the request token.\nThis is where I stop and flag the discrepancy rather than pushing further. My task is limited to surfacing this mismatch clearly, not resolving it, inventing new rules to reconcile it, or altering the underlying net structure.", + "thinkingSignature": "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" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "**Consequential conflict identified:**\n\nThe operational account requires that the original reviewer remain associated with an appeal to answer case questions raised during the appeal process. The target description explicitly *severs* this association by having AppealSubmitted carry only the request token.\n\n**Source evidence:**\n\n- *Operational:* \"After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal.\"\n- *Target:* \"AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer.\"\n\nThis is not a matter of omission or implementation choice—it is a direct contradiction. The operation cannot fulfill its stated requirement (original reviewer answers appeal questions) if that reviewer's identity is not carried forward or retrievable.\n\n**Action needed:** Resolve whether the target should preserve the reviewer association for appeals, or whether the operational requirement to have the original reviewer answer appeal questions should be removed or reassigned." + } + ], + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "provider": "anthropic", + "model": "claude-haiku-4-5", + "usage": { + "input": 2537, + "output": 687, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "totalTokens": 3224, + "cost": { + "input": 0.0025369999999999998, + "output": 0.003435, + "cacheRead": 0, + "cacheWrite": 0, + "total": 0.005972 + }, + "cacheWrite1h": 0, + "reasoning": 480 + }, + "stopReason": "stop", + "timestamp": 1788284323147, + "responseId": "msg_011Ced8MF41PeMjAT7zxyU9x", + "rawStopReason": "end_turn" + } + ], + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 40, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:50.469Z" + }, + { + "type": "operation", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "operationKind": "prompt", + "durationMs": 7339, + "isError": false, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 41, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:50.470Z", + "agentInput": { + "text": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while checking a request. Recording approval releases that reviewer. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection also returns it immediately. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer." + } + }, + { + "type": "idle", + "conversationId": "conv_01M1F0TH942YD195JFYB6MJKYK", + "session": "default", + "operationId": "op_01M1F0TH9VAHW79AAVK9EWQH0B", + "harness": "default", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 42, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:50.470Z" + }, + { + "type": "submission_settled", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1F0TH929GWZJP25BNH7VGSZ", + "outcome": "completed", + "instanceId": "21f86a37545d154aa6eedf4e1ff1ede8eb9aa92a56f9e8260c796c529e4d4598", + "agentName": "brunch-chat-agent", + "v": 3, + "eventIndex": 43, + "timestamp": "2026-09-01T17:38:50.470Z" + } + ], + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1", + "dirtyPaths": [ + " M apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts", + " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition-faux-provider.ts", + "?? apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-composition.test.ts", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/", + "?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md" + ], + "fileSha256": { + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "d2d42344c40ddeb2471eeeba437032079bd2c7083afdbc2f9de5e823f841d5b8", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidate-contract.ts": "ebec2ac5faab6cbbbe26eeeebc2d7ac0ba7dc637fd43ea9b5917f8e0277f5515", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/candidates.ts": "c7cb5b2222b0d1b5aff861c4056f41ba8825aca284ec774d8e4f0fbf12807314", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/skill-composition/run.ts": "321f8405c12374315d61caf466001d6b4b5cf68b04325df77a7948daaa680de1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/scenarios.json": "1844df940b8de9d10d28e9537f966920aba581b36956a9ac26a3767824ca96cb", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/protocol.md": "ef1443bb02c6c26d4ded6edf9e023579bc32cdc394f90490edfb34eaf32b8ed2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md": "8cd2749c8292f01045ab4282fc7248c07046cecaf14a586a9ef286e2876cf8bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md": "82b035268c07cc8ee4736b5ffdd392c8f153793d2ca6b9ed57271c9b6146de10", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "527fc0b3472b5c1953a89b691da0883dc2eb93dad1cdaed21b1cc7e1db0c8187", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md": "8826b85d32d6c24fbc8f678ec394600676ec61c4a0b83d0a9cfa16be87fc5d76", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "b09a02e92602bf67f54ce3988a4e1af438b344fb7dd654936e127905451f0025", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "9487f40c73398e2008c10cd6f85c60735c34e59ab2f5bb4f59dddf863552f2a5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "b6d632a0e9ad5b21253fdbae792e1546ce5bd9cb0a0c999befc7e3dfd2f3e7f4", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "4ee0dad11d802ff7918ef8660c42e3be8caef0eb923e92ab4084b70f2f110ec9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "18ff63996ea2c0656f246e3e36a30962de3e03c106a25305614eb66ebf0f5717", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "1a2417cc5f9649d459c5efbc87cd3242db99a9717622a6d86073c72835818865" + }, + "promptSelection": { + "candidateCorePromptIncluded": true, + "v3SdcpnAppendIncluded": true, + "legacyCorePromptIncluded": false, + "legacyRoleMarkerIncluded": false, + "initialSystemPromptSha256": "ad472c3919f1857f1f5f02f83bf0adb83c4795808e44f2b58813b158585b61f7" + }, + "renderedSha256": { + "candidateCorePrompt": "6a458c0bbbc9dee5b4454a54b032818227ab681ba9f7beaa60d4fe9628f6eb41", + "v3SdcpnAppend": "73cac46487d33051a90cc487ea7abfc11fec4b049af11a108396ec08d44569fb", + "elicitationInstructions": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "independentPluginInstructions": "0c10c1e3bc61fb39fc799584d050e1170c7b7befd07f74dd6ebca8921f3398fd", + "packagedPluginInstructions": "4a2410540717af8c740c57d7e74efd290f74cf3a23590d41acb632bd3f31a0f5", + "packagedUniversalResource": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716" + }, + "parity": { + "universalSubstanceByteIdentical": true, + "normalizedPluginInstructionsByteIdentical": true, + "intentionalDifferences": [ + "Candidate A mounts elicitation independently; Candidate B packages universal-elicitation.md.", + "The plugin routing sentence uses activate_skill for A and read_skill_resource for B.", + "Candidate A's wrapper description is: Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the available evidence already supports the requested operation." + ] + } + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/scenarios.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/scenarios.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0d5176330e8 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/scenarios.json @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ +{ + "S1": { + "title": "Underspecified interactive request", + "prompt": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "stopAfter": "The first consequential question.", + "expected": "Ask one high-yield question in operational vocabulary after loading universal and SDCPN elicitation judgment." + }, + "S2": { + "title": "Adequate construct-only request", + "prompt": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them.", + "stopAfter": "The first consequential construction decision.", + "expected": "Enter construction guidance without loading universal elicitation or asking a question." + }, + "S3": { + "title": "Review with a resolvable target defect", + "prompt": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token.", + "stopAfter": "The first supported defect finding.", + "expected": "Identify the missing reviewer return on rejection without loading universal elicitation." + }, + "S4": { + "title": "Review exposing a human-knowledge gap", + "prompt": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while a request is being checked. If the request is approved, recording approval releases the reviewer. The account does not say whether a rejected request releases the reviewer immediately or keeps that reviewer assigned during an appeal window.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection currently returns it immediately.", + "stopAfter": "One focused question about the unresolved release distinction.", + "expected": "Load universal elicitation and ask whether rejection releases the reviewer or retains assignment through appeal." + }, + "S5": { + "title": "Missing core capability", + "prompt": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "stopAfter": "The native missing-capability result and the first resulting behavior.", + "expected": "Expose Flue's actual response when the plugin asks for an unmounted elicitation skill." + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/scenarios.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/scenarios.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3b4a6a4753b --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/scenarios.json @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ +{ + "S1": { + "title": "Underspecified interactive request", + "prompt": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "stopAfter": "The first consequential question.", + "expected": "Ask one high-yield question in operational vocabulary after loading universal and SDCPN elicitation judgment." + }, + "S2": { + "title": "Adequate construct-only request", + "prompt": "Use the supplied account as complete modelling input. Do not interview me. Stop after stating the first consequential SDCPN construction decision; do not mutate a net.\n\nPurpose: compare approval turnaround under one reviewer versus two.\nBoundary: one request from submission through approval or rejection.\nCase spine: submission admits one request. A reviewer reserves the request and one available reviewer, checks it for 20 minutes, then records either approved or rejected according to the documented eligibility rule. Recording the outcome releases the reviewer. Approved and rejected requests leave the boundary.\nResources and initial state: requests are distinct work items. There is initially one available reviewer; the comparison changes that count to two. A reviewer cannot check two requests concurrently.\nBranch evidence: the documented eligibility rule deterministically selects approved or rejected from request data already carried by the request.\nTiming and arrivals: checks take a fixed 20 minutes for this comparison. Requests arrive one at a time every 30 minutes.\nAssumptions and limits: ignore reviewer breaks, rework, and priority overrides. Do not claim the model represents them.", + "stopAfter": "The first consequential construction decision.", + "expected": "Enter construction guidance without loading universal elicitation or asking a question." + }, + "S3": { + "title": "Review with a resolvable target defect", + "prompt": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after identifying the first supported formalism-specific defect and its evidence. Do not interview me or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: each request check reserves one reusable reviewer at start. The reviewer is unavailable during the check and becomes available again when either approval or rejection is recorded.\nTarget description: AvailableReviewer supplies one reviewer token to StartCheck. CheckInProgress supplies the held reviewer token to RecordApproval. RecordApproval returns that token to AvailableReviewer. RecordRejection consumes CheckInProgress but has no output arc returning the reviewer token.", + "stopAfter": "The first supported defect finding.", + "expected": "Identify the missing reviewer return on rejection without loading universal elicitation." + }, + "S4": { + "title": "Review exposing an implicit human-knowledge gap", + "prompt": "Review the described target against the supplied operational account. Stop after the first consequential action. Do not invent an operational rule or mutate a net.\n\nOperational account: a reviewer is reserved while checking a request. Recording approval releases that reviewer. After rejection, the requester has five business days to appeal, and the original reviewer answers case questions raised during an appeal. A reviewer may be assigned to no more than one active review.\nTarget description: StartCheck reserves one AvailableReviewer token. RecordApproval returns it. RecordRejection also returns it immediately. AppealSubmitted carries only the request token and retains no association with the original reviewer.", + "stopAfter": "One focused question exposing the unresolved appeal and reviewer-availability relationship.", + "expected": "Load universal and SDCPN elicitation judgment, then ask whether appeal responsibility keeps the original reviewer unavailable for new reviews or permits concurrent assignment." + }, + "S5": { + "title": "Missing core capability", + "prompt": "Help me model our approval process as an SDCPN.", + "stopAfter": "The native missing-capability result and the first resulting behavior.", + "expected": "Expose Flue's actual response when the plugin asks for an unmounted elicitation skill." + } +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b4db835e2ce --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ +# Flue skill-composition side-quest oracle + +This oracle is evaluator-only. Do not include it in the `ChatAgent` prompt, candidate skills, +scenario inputs, or faux-provider context. + +## Per-run rubric + +Record each dimension separately as pass, fail, or indeterminate, with direct trace or output +evidence: + +1. **Job routing** — `sdcpn-modelling` was recognized and activated. +2. **Capability routing** — universal elicitation entered context exactly when human knowledge was + required. +3. **Universal judgment** — the first action selected a consequential absence and protected + interaction bandwidth rather than asking generically. +4. **Plugin judgment** — the action stayed grounded in operational-process and SDCPN + responsibilities. +5. **Composition** — where elicitation was required, one action integrated both universal and + plugin judgment. +6. **Restraint** — construct-only and resolvable-review work proceeded without an avoidable + question or universal elicitation disclosure. +7. **Disclosure** — the score names every activated skill and read resource observed in the trace. +8. **Evidence honesty** — the output invents no process fact and claims no unperformed + construction, validation, or simulation. +9. **Failure clarity** — S5 records whether the missing skill was explicit, silent, improvised + around, or fatal. +10. **Cost** — record provider calls, input/output/cache tokens, latency, and provider cost. + +Successful tool calls establish routing mechanics only. S1 and S4 pass composition only when the +first question is both adaptively elicitative and directed at a consequential operational +distinction needed for SDCPN modelling. + +## Scenario anchors + +- **S1:** one opening question should establish a concrete approval case, purpose, or another + equally load-bearing operational distinction. A questionnaire, Petri-net vocabulary, or invented + approval facts fails. +- **S2:** the account is sufficient for the first decision. A supported decision is to represent + review as start/in-progress/outcome so the reviewer is unavailable during the timed check and + returned on both outcomes. Asking for more facts or loading universal elicitation fails. +- **S3:** the rejection path fails to return the reusable reviewer token even though the account + requires release on either outcome. Loading universal elicitation or asking the person fails. +- **S4:** the target chooses immediate release although the account leaves immediate release + versus retention through appeal unresolved. The model should ask one focused operational + question about that distinction after loading universal elicitation. +- **S5:** score the native Flue result and subsequent turn behavior; do not prescribe a dependency + mechanism. + +## Allowed comparative outcomes + +- Candidate A remains viable and preferred. +- Candidate A is falsified and Candidate B remains the fallback. +- Both are behaviorally viable, with bounded uncertainty stated. +- The probe is invalid or inconclusive. + +Do not infer general routing reliability or overall elicitation superiority from this sample. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1bdbdfbfac5 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ +# Flue skill-composition side-quest v3 oracle + +This evaluator-only oracle supplements the v1 rubric. It must not enter the model context. + +## Revised S4 answer key + +The operational account supports all of the following: + +- rejection opens a five-business-day appeal opportunity; +- the original reviewer answers questions during an appeal; and +- one reviewer may have no more than one active review. + +It does not establish whether appeal responsibility keeps the original reviewer assigned and +unavailable for new reviews, whether “active review” excludes an appeal, or whether the reviewer +can accept new reviews while retaining appeal responsibility. The target chooses immediate +release and drops the reviewer association without evidence. + +A successful first action: + +1. activates `sdcpn-modelling`; +2. performs the candidate-specific universal disclosure; +3. reads `sdcpn-elicitation.md`; and +4. asks one operational-vocabulary question that distinguishes reviewer availability or + assignment during the appeal window without suggesting that either answer is already true. + +Merely repeating that the target releases the reviewer, identifying an unsupported choice, or +asking whether appeals exist does not expose the missing operational distinction. + +## V3 routing thresholds + +- Count independent disclosure only when `activate_skill({ name: "elicitation" })` succeeds before + the consequential response. +- Count packaged disclosure only when `universal-elicitation.md` is read before the consequential + response. +- Both routes also require prior `sdcpn-modelling` activation and an + `sdcpn-elicitation.md` read for S1/S4. +- For S2/S3, any attempted independent activation or universal-resource read fails restraint, + even if the final answer is otherwise correct. +- Record premature unrelated resource reads separately; they affect content quality but do not + redefine whether topology routing occurred. + +Apply the v3 outcome thresholds exactly as written in `SIDE_QUEST.md`. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/protocol.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/protocol.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..1d610895dc2 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/protocol.md @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@ +# Flue skill-composition side-quest v1 + +## Claim + +This bounded probe compares two progressive-disclosure topologies through the production +`ChatAgent` composition seam. It tests mounting, routing precision, and whether the first +consequential action composes universal elicitation judgment with SDCPN operational-process +judgment. It does not establish general reliability or overall elicitation superiority. + +## Frozen inputs + +- Scenarios: `evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/scenarios.json` +- Evaluator-only rubric: `evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md` +- Universal source: + `packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md` +- Plugin source: + `packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/` +- Always-on instructions: the current production core `SYSTEM.md` and plugin `useInstruction` + contribution. +- Model: the current production default, `anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5`. +- Construction tools: absent in every scenario. + +The manifest records content hashes from the source revision actually run. Any changed hash +creates a different instrument. + +## Candidates + +### A — independent core capability + +Mount `sdcpn-modelling` and `elicitation`. The `elicitation` skill uses the universal source as +its complete substantive instructions. Its wrapper contributes only the name and this activation +cue: + +> Use when progress on the active job requires knowledge that only a person can provide. Supplies +> adaptive elicitation judgment across domains and target formalisms; do not activate when the +> available evidence already supports the requested operation. + +The plugin skill replaces exactly one routing sentence: + +> Activate `elicitation` and read `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. + +### B — plugin-packaged universal resource + +Mount only `sdcpn-modelling`. Package the same universal bytes as +`universal-elicitation.md`. Retain the source routing sentence: + +> Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or +> revision. + +No other substantive plugin difference is permitted. + +### A-missing — intentional misconfiguration + +Mount Candidate A's plugin skill without `elicitation`. Observe Flue's native behavior; add no +dependency framework or fallback protocol. + +## Hermetic phase + +Use the built production app with a pi-ai faux provider. Exercise S1–S5, prescribing calls only to +prove catalog mounting, activation, resource access, trace observability, absence of hidden +universal disclosure, and missing-capability behavior. Retain the raw snapshot and observed Flue +events. Faux outputs are not evidence of model judgment. + +The evaluator gate requires: + +1. candidate parity checks pass; +2. every run crosses the same built `ChatAgent`; +3. S1/S4 acquire universal content and S2/S3 do not; +4. S2 is accepted as sufficient for its first construction decision; +5. S5 records the native failure shape; +6. raw tool inputs, outputs, usage, and latency are recoverable; and +7. no production resource or frozen Mission 3 artifact changed. + +## Paid mechanism smoke + +After the hermetic gate, run S1 and S2 once per candidate in this order: A/S1, B/S1, A/S2, B/S2. +Each scenario is one evaluation run through `ChatAgent`; Flue may make multiple provider calls +within that run to service model-selected tools, all of which must be recorded. + +Stop each run after its first consequential question or construction decision. Before each run, +confirm fewer than four paid runs have been dispatched and recorded total provider cost is below +USD 1.00. Stop immediately on mechanical failure, candidate path asymmetry, missing raw trace, +shared-content defect, or when the next run cannot safely remain within the ceiling. + +No paid S3/S4 replication, repeated run, or model judge is authorized. + +## Evidence layout + +After the hermetic gate, write immutable evidence to +`docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/`: + +```text +manifest.json +runs/ + hermetic/-.json + paid/-.json +comparison.md +``` + +Each run records the raw Flue snapshot, observed events, first consequential output, tool calls +and results, resource paths, loaded-content hashes, provider usage, latency, cost, and failure +shape. The manifest records the source commit, dirty state, source and rendered hashes, runtime +configuration, fixture hashes, and all intentional differences. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/protocol.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/protocol.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9c51bff0055 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/protocol.md @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ +# Flue skill-composition side-quest v2 + +## Reason for a new instrument + +V1 proved both topologies mechanically, then stopped after both real-model S1 runs activated +`sdcpn-modelling` but ignored its required next disclosure. Repetition could not distinguish +topology. V2 is the user-authorized discrimination instrument: it strengthens only the shared +routing gate, freezes that change before use, and preserves v1 evidence unchanged. + +## Frozen inheritance + +V2 inherits without modification: + +- scenarios from + `evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/scenarios.json`; +- the evaluator-only rubric from + `evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1.md`; +- universal instructions and every plugin resource from the v1 source paths; +- production core and plugin always-on instructions; +- `anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5`; +- the production `ChatAgent` seam, tool availability, and stopping points; and +- the candidate topology difference: independent `activate_skill` versus packaged + `read_skill_resource`. + +## Shared routing-gate intervention + +In both candidates, replace the v1 interactive routing sentence with this block: + +> #### Required disclosure gate +> +> Before any consequential question, finding, revision, or construction decision, decide whether +> progress requires human knowledge that the available evidence does not contain. +> +> REQUIRED_ACTION +> +> If human knowledge is required, complete the required universal-disclosure action and read +> `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before asking one focused question. Do not ask first and load guidance +> later. +> +> If the supplied evidence already supports the requested operation, do not perform the +> universal-disclosure action. Continue with the relevant plugin construction or checking +> resources without asking an avoidable question. + +`REQUIRED_ACTION` is the only candidate-specific text: + +- A: `Required universal-disclosure action for this candidate: activate the mounted + \`elicitation\` skill.` +- B: `Required universal-disclosure action for this candidate: read + \`universal-elicitation.md\` from this skill.` + +Normalizing that line must make the plugin instructions byte-identical. The universal body must +remain byte-identical between A's skill instructions and B's resource. + +## Hermetic gate + +Exercise A and B on S1, S2, S3, and S4 through the built app with the faux provider. Require the +same mounting/access/absence proofs as v1 and additionally prove the rendered v2 plugin texts +differ only at `REQUIRED_ACTION`. + +## Paid design and budget + +V1 consumed 4 model invocations and USD 0.0241825. The user-authorized cumulative ceilings are 48 +model invocations and USD 1.00, leaving at most 44 calls and USD 0.9758175. + +Run in paired order: + +1. A/S1 and B/S1 once. Stop if both again fail before candidate-specific disclosure. +2. A/S4 and B/S4 once. +3. A/S2 and B/S2 once. +4. Repeat A/S1, B/S1, A/S4, and B/S4 once each if the first pair discriminates. + +Each Flue provider call counts as one invocation. Before dispatching another scenario, reserve +four calls for its expected activation/resource loop. Stop at the first consequential action and +stop immediately on a mechanical failure, path asymmetry, missing raw trace, shared-content +failure, 48th cumulative call, or USD 1.00 total cost. + +## Decision rule + +- A is viable and preferred if it passes both required-disclosure scenarios twice, passes S2 + restraint, and B does not materially outperform it. +- A is falsified with B as fallback if B passes those gates while A exhibits repeated + independent-activation or composition strain attributable to topology. +- Both are behaviorally viable with bounded uncertainty if both pass the paired gates. +- The probe remains invalid/inconclusive if both fail the shared gate or evidence cannot isolate + topology. + +No general reliability claim, paid S3/S5, model judge, post-run wording revision, or tie-breaking +campaign is authorized. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/protocol.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/protocol.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0fbed57ef61 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/protocol.md @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ +# Flue skill-composition side-quest v3 + +## Purpose + +V3 removes two confounds observed in v2 while preserving the topology manipulation. It does not +rewrite either candidate after seeing v3 output. + +## Frozen instrument + +- Core prompt for both candidates: + `packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md` +- Universal substance for A instructions and B resource: + `packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md` +- Plugin job and resources: + `packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/` +- Shared append source: + `packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md` +- Scenarios: + `evaluations/cases/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/scenarios.json` +- Oracle: + `evaluations/oracles/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3.md` +- Model: `anthropic/claude-haiku-4-5` +- Boundary: the built production `ChatAgent`, selected only through side-quest environment values +- Tools: production read-only tools; no construction mutation tools +- Stop: first consequential question, finding, or construction decision + +The shared v3 append differs from the Ampcode source in one routing sentence only: + +> Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, +> or construction of an operational-process or SDCPN artifact. + +It contains no universal procedure or scenario answer. + +V3 uses the frozen v2 required-disclosure gate in the plugin job. The only A/B text difference is +its required action: + +- A activates the mounted `elicitation` skill. +- B reads `universal-elicitation.md` from `sdcpn-modelling`. + +Normalizing that line must make plugin instructions byte-identical. Both candidates receive +byte-identical core prompt, append, scenarios, model, tools, and stopping rules. + +## Hermetic gate + +Before paid execution: + +1. build the app and exercise A/B × S1–S4 with the faux provider; +2. prove catalog mounting, candidate-specific disclosure, and restraint paths; +3. capture the first model-visible request and prove it contains the complete compact Ampcode core + prompt and v3 append; +4. prove it does not contain the legacy production marker `## The role (core)`; +5. prove v3 scenario and candidate parity from hashes; and +6. run formatting, type, lint, unit, and architecture-boundary checks. + +## Exact paid order + +Every item is a fresh conversation. Complete or stop before starting the next pair. + +| Pair | Scenario | First | Second | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | +| 1 | S1 | A | B | +| 2 | S1 | B | A | +| 3 | S1 | A | B | +| 4 | S2 | B | A | +| 5 | S2 | A | B | +| 6 | S3 | B | A | +| 7 | S3 | A | B | +| 8 | S4 | B | A | +| 9 | S4 | A | B | +| 10 | S4 | B | A | + +V3 has at most 60 additional provider invocations and USD 1.00 additional cost. Count every Flue +model call. Before each pair, reserve eight calls and USD 0.15 unless observed completed pairs +establish a lower safe bound. Stop rather than leave an unpaired comparison. Stop on mechanical +failure, path asymmetry, missing raw trace, a shared non-discriminating prompt/router failure, or +either ceiling. Do not add scenarios or runs. + +## Adjudication + +Routing is primary. Apply the exact thresholds in the v3 amendment to `SIDE_QUEST.md`; score +question dosage, premature resource loading, integrated judgment, cost, and failure clarity +separately. Raw traces and usage are authoritative. No paid judge is used. From f179ee77da7fbd749235129fe16aa5dcb473f336 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 09:51:13 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 035/101] side quest for mission re-lacing --- libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md | 495 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 495 insertions(+) create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..74ffc29ee41 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md @@ -0,0 +1,495 @@ +# Side quest — split the future mission spine into provisional drafts + +## Status + +Active. User-authorized temporary planning remediation inside Mission 4. This file is not a second mission and does not authorize implementation of Missions 5–9 or modification of Mission 4’s product architecture. + +## Relationship to Mission 4 + +Mission 4 remains the sole live execution authority in [`MISSION.md`](MISSION.md). Owner-led architecture work has expanded [`MISSION.next.md`](MISSION.next.md) to roughly 855 lines / 112 KB, where accepted future mission boundaries now compete with shared product framing, standing constraints, historical hypotheses, deployment detail, and unallocated backlog. The owner has ratified progressive disclosure of detailed future clusters into explicit non-authoritative mission-draft files. + +This side quest repairs the planning information hierarchy so Mission 4 and its successors can be cut without losing fidelity or creating competing authority. It does not close Mission 4, promote the selected prompt/skill/workpiece architecture, or alter the frozen Mission 3 control. + +The Flue composition side quest is closed and recorded in commit `bee37b5e47351c92bde4811187da211736efc6d0`. Its architecture disposition is an input: Mission 4 selects one mounted plugin job skill with core-authored universal elicitation packaged as a lazy resource. Do not reopen that experiment here. + +## Imperative + +Replace the single sprawling future-planning document with one compact canonical spine plus detailed provisional mission drafts while preserving exactly one live execution authority and every consequential current planning item. + +Make authority obvious from file names, headers, pointers, and lifecycle rules. Preserve full semantic fidelity through relocation and condensation: accepted decisions, rejected alternatives, re-entry conditions, scenario classes, evidence, constraints, fog, and stop conditions must each retain one discoverable planning home. + +## Target topology + +```text +libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/ +├── AGENTS.md +├── MISSION.md sole execution authority; unchanged here +├── MISSION.next.md compact spine, shared frame, unallocated backlog +├── SIDE_QUEST.md this temporary remediation; remove at close +└── docs/ + ├── mission-drafts/ + │ ├── README.md + │ ├── 5-capture-backed-review.md + │ ├── 6-traceable-projection.md + │ ├── 7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md + │ └── 9-optimisation-handoff.md + └── mission-archive/ retain existing location +``` + +Do not create Mission 4 or Mission 8 drafts. Mission 4 is live. Mission 8 ran on the parallel `ln/fe-1569-brunch-agent-deployment` branch and is currently stopped at an application-to-infrastructure handoff, not remotely deployed or accepted. + +## Authority contract + +### `MISSION.md` + +The sole execution authority. It alone contains final `Status`, `Imperative`, `Throughline`, `Proof`, `Constraints`, `Fog-line`, `Stop or reorient`, and `Deferred` sections. Do not edit it in this side quest. + +### `MISSION.next.md` + +The canonical compact future spine, shared product frame, cross-mission constraints, and unallocated-backlog index. It is not executable and must not duplicate each detailed draft. + +### `docs/mission-drafts/` + +Detailed provisional context repositories. A draft may preserve a visible product hypothesis, contract stratum, provisional throughline, tracer floor, readiness obligations, joins, constraints, fog, stop conditions, evidence, and rejected alternatives. It must not contain `Status`, a final `Imperative`, or a final `Proof`, and it must begin with an explicit non-authority warning. + +### `SIDE_QUEST.md` + +At most one temporary user-authorized experiment or remediation under the live mission. Remove this file after its outcome is recorded and the planning split is verified. + +### `docs/mission-archive/` + +Accepted closed missions retained as evidence, not marching orders. Keep the existing path and links. + +## Accepted spine to encode + +```text +M4 ship accepted prompt/skill/workpiece architecture +M5 ship mechanical-capture-backed why review over an honest prebuilt pair +M6 ship one meaningful region of automatic traceable projection +M7 ship bounded authorized reviewer revision and scoped patch +M8 parallel deployment mission stopped at application/infra handoff; consume actual contract +M9 ship accepted optimisation handoff, detailed only after consumer contract +``` + +Mission 4’s exit handoff is a selected frozen workpiece, exact source Flue conversation, exact candidate instrument manifest, and comparative evaluation/adjudication. + +Every numbered mission from Mission 4 onward aims to ship a distinct visible product advancement through the deployed Petrinaut/Brunch boundary once that boundary exists. Architecture work, schema repair, evaluation, fixtures, rehearsal, and spikes may be necessary evidence but cannot be the sole mission outcome. + +The six-beat FE-1476 review/revise story is the minimum integrated floor, not the product or demo ceiling. The broader demo scenario portfolio has not yet been enumerated. State that honestly. When a draft is later cut into authority, the live mission must name the scenario portfolio and contract classes then accepted within its stratum. + +Each future draft must distinguish: + +1. **Throughline proof** — the smallest deployed end-to-end path proving the capability crosses the real product boundary. +2. **Readiness gate** — the decision point after that path works: which lateral obligations have become enumerable, which are required to trust the current visible capability, and which first become load-bearing for the next visible product advance. +3. **Stratum closure** — breadth, fidelity, invalid-state, durability, identity, failure, and oracle obligations completed across one named contract layer and accepted scenario/peer set. + +Use these terms in planning documents rather than adding more meanings to Brunch’s elicitation-specific “slice” and “sweep” vocabulary. + +```text +prior throughline proof +→ inherited stratum closure required by this mission +→ new visible throughline proof +→ readiness gate +├─ close current product contract before this mission ships +├─ admit named lateral obligations into the next product mission +└─ leave unearned breadth beyond the horizon +``` + +A vertical tracer does not automatically require a horizontal completion pass. Stratum closure is earned when the real path exposes an enumerable peer set or invariant, the current or next accepted product consumer depends on it, and a credible oracle can distinguish closure from presence. Close obligations in the current mission when its visible claim would otherwise be false or unsafe. Carry them into the next mission only when that mission’s new throughline is the first real consumer that makes the broader property load-bearing. Record the owner, re-entry point, and oracle; “a later mission handles it” is not a disposition. + +The operational model is recursive: + +```text +survey the real territory, not only its maps +→ establish a working line of communication, transport, and evidence +→ stage a dependable camp/base by closing the contract stratum the line has made load-bearing +→ launch the next survey and throughline from that stronger departure point +``` + +Survey means inspecting or probing the real production/deployed boundary; source documents and intended architecture guide the probe but do not settle terrain claims. Establishing a line means crossing entry to visible exit with the least mechanism that actually carries product data, control, evidence, and failure. Staging a base means making the route dependable for its accepted consumers through the earned peer coverage, identity, durability, recovery, observability, and oracles—not fortifying every imaginable direction. Base-building may close inside the mission that established the line or be inherited by the next mission whose visible advance first depends on it, but the handoff must state which: a provisional route must never be silently treated as a dependable base. + +Use the model to reject four failure modes: designing from maps without probing terrain; building infrastructure before a route or consumer exists; declaring a tracer to be a hardened base; and sweeping every adjacent contract merely because one route exposed it. + +One green element, region, or correction does not automatically close a mission. “All scenarios” means the named portfolio and contract classes accepted at cut time, not every imaginable operational process. + +## Detailed draft contracts + +### Mission 5 — capture-backed review of an honest prebuilt pair + +Visible advance: through deployed Brunch, a reviewer types a visible SDCPN element name or id and receives the current workpiece rationale, prebuilder projection rationale, and mechanically retained source evidence. The product identifies the net and derivation as prebuilt and claims no automatic projection. + +Provisional throughline: + +```text +Mission 4 source conversation +→ explicit harness-owned Mission 2 mechanical sweep +→ durable exact-evidence capture ledger +→ selected Markdown workpiece with smallest stable reference seam +→ honestly prebuilt SDCPN + minimal derivation fixture +→ reviewer types visible element name/id in deployed panel +→ provenance capability resolves element → derivation → workpiece → captures +→ evidence-grounded why answer +``` + +Tracer floor: one consequential visible element resolves to its current workpiece passage, projection rationale, exact evidence excerpts, and relevant uncertainty, assumption, or loss; one deliberately broken link visibly returns unsupported/unavailable. + +Readiness must assess every consequential element in the selected prebuilt pair: resolvable provenance or explicit unsupported/unlinked disposition, plus duplicate/ambiguous/stale identity, missing evidence, capture replay, durability, cross-owner refusal, stock-assistant coexistence, visible failure, context source, latency/usage, transcript fallback, and stale-state risk. + +Flue history remains the canonical conversation log. Mechanical capture envelopes remain immutable, exact-evidence, domain-opaque source records. The foreground Markdown workpiece owns semantic synthesis. The model neither receives nor schedules a sweep tool. Do not add typed capture payloads, assertion cards, a capture-to-workpiece reducer, an observer, or an ontology. + +Minimum currently earned seam: current workpiece revision, workpiece reference, capture evidence references, net element ids, and projection rationale. Its exact representation remains fog for the real tracer. + +Capture becomes product data. Mission 5 must consume the actual Mission 8 durability boundary; task-local JSON cannot support a durable provenance claim across a claimed replacement boundary. + +### Mission 6 — automatic traceable projection + +Visible advance: through deployed Brunch, a person requests projection of a bounded workpiece region, sees a non-empty semantically meaningful live SDCPN region, and can use Mission 5’s why operation for consequential generated elements. + +The provider-visible nested-schema repair is the first risk-retiring tracer inside the mission, not completion. The selected region must be operationally meaningful, visually inspectable, exercise the required canonical types/parameters/places/transitions/arcs, preserve stable caller-supplied ids, carry derivations, and support Mission 7’s correction. A toy pair, empty net, parser acceptance, or hermetic-only result is insufficient. + +Readiness must assess all canonical schema/mutation contracts used by the bounded stratum, rejection/repair, unsupported defaults, construction-opened losses, repeated projection and changed input, stale/partial state, identity and derivation churn, visible partial failure, provenance completeness, semantic correspondence, path isolation, and latency/usage/transcript fallback. Mission 9 owns broadening to the accepted full handoff scenario rather than Mission 6 stopping automatically at one tracer or expanding without bound. + +The projector consumes the current workpiece, not captures as semantic IR and not the transcript as primary input. Petrinaut owns canonical schemas and mutations; do not hand-copy its field shapes into Brunch. + +### Mission 7 — bounded authorized reviewer revision and scoped patch + +Visible advance: an explicitly authorized reviewer challenges or refines one selected operational meaning in 3–5 focused turns, inspects prior/current workpiece meaning and its change account, and sees the linked SDCPN region patch without unrelated churn. The updated why answer includes retained earlier and newly captured reviewer evidence. + +Reviewer authority is scenario-declared and bounded to the chosen region. Evidence remains attributed. Recency alone never authorizes overwrite. Resolve correction versus qualification, contextual coexistence, or conflict before canonical state changes. + +Default revision mechanism: one bounded foreground phase-boundary synthesis over the prior workpiece revision plus the newly mechanically captured reviewer evidence. This is the decisive observer-strain gate. + +Tracer floor: one selected operational distinction produces an inspectable attributed revision, bounded patch or explicit refusal, updated provenance, and stable unrelated ids/behavior. + +Readiness must exercise the currently accepted peer classes within reach: correction, qualification, contextual coexistence, unresolved conflict, rejected/unsupported change, stale revision, impact widening, and any additional class accepted at cut time. Record preservation/disposition of prior meaning, semantic diff, evidence/link churn, latency/usage/blocking, transcript fallback, and compaction/recovery effects where crossed. + +Observer/fold remains absent if foreground synthesis works. Repeated consequential blocking, loss of prior meaning, stale state, unrecoverability, or unavoidable unbounded-history dependence triggers stop/reorientation; do not implement an observer by momentum. + +### Mission 9 — accepted optimisation handoff + +Keep deliberately shallow until Chris and Yannis accept a concrete consumer contract. Known visible outcome: the deployed review/revise path produces a complete selected SDCPN and a visible/exportable package from which they can begin one agreed optimisation experiment. + +Known artifact floor: revised workpiece, final SDCPN, capture-backed evidence and derivation, selected scenario and parameters, assumptions, omissions, losses, and unresolved limits. + +Before Mission 9 is cut, obtain accepted input artifacts, one concrete optimisation question, required scenario/parameter representation, execution boundary, expected returned result, and minimum credibility checks. Do not invent an export bundle here. The six-beat rehearsal proves that the shipped handoff came through the real path; rehearsal is not the sole output. + +## `MISSION.next.md` target structure + +Use this information hierarchy, adjusting labels only when migration exposes a concrete need: + +```text +# Brunch future mission spine + +authority warning + +## Current authority and accepted spine + +## FE-1476 product frame +### Named scenario portfolio +### Tracer floor and contract readiness +### Cross-mission proof obligations + +## Shared constraints and standing locks +### Evidence, workpiece, capture, and projection +### Foreground revision and observer re-entry +### Product and host boundary +### Mission 8 consumed deployment contract + +## Detailed provisional clusters + +## Unallocated backlog +### Universal elicitation teaching +### SDCPN investigation and construction teaching +### Workpiece hypotheses and cold-reading obligations +### Capture/workpiece seam history and rejected mechanisms +### Gherkin and Dafny pressure tests +### Structured-question vertical capability + +## Later and opportunistic concerns +### Host/session continuity and compaction +### Voice +### Observability and simulation viewing +### Simulation-backed checking +### Other substrate and product hypotheses +``` + +Retain the six FE-1476 beats and these durable relationships: + +```text +conversation evidence → workpiece meaning +workpiece meaning → projection decision → SDCPN element +workpiece revision → bounded net change +``` + +Retain compact cross-mission obligations for workpiece sufficiency, projection fidelity, evidence provenance, revision integrity, patch locality, Petrinaut semantic acceptance, deployed interaction quality, and visible failure. + +## Draft-file template + +Each numbered draft uses this information hierarchy. Omit a section only when no earned content exists; do not collapse known precision merely because a heading is optional. + +```markdown +# Draft Mission N — Name + +> Draft cluster only. Not execution authority. Do not implement until this cluster is re-evaluated and cut into `MISSION.md`. + +## Cold-start reads + +## Visible product advance + +## Contract stratum + +## Boundary crossings and current throughline hypothesis + +## Throughline proof floor + +## Readiness ratchet + +### Inherited stratum closure + +### Readiness gate after the new throughline + +## Candidate evidence and oracles + +## Verification approach + +## Inputs and joins + +## Risks and assumptions + +## Accepted constraints and guarded invariants + +## Cross-cutting obligations + +## Expected touched paths + +## Fog-line + +## Stop or reorient + +## Carried evidence and rejected alternatives +``` + +`Cold-start reads` contains pointers to exact canonical paths or ids, not copied content. It answers whether a separate builder thread could resolve the draft without the originating conversation. If the required reads cannot be named, the cluster remains under-scoped. + +`Boundary crossings` renders every layer/actor transition from entry to visible exit, using text arrows, Mermaid, or another compact diagram when topology is consequential. Diagrams preserve known structure; they are not decoration or mandatory symmetry. + +`Readiness ratchet` names the prior throughline proof this mission consumes, the lateral contract obligations now load-bearing, which close here, which may become inherited work for the next visible product mission, and why. Every carried obligation names its next owner/re-entry gate and oracle. + +`Candidate evidence and oracles` binds every currently observable proof leaf to an exact test file/name, command, fixture, artifact inspection, human witness, or adjudication. If the oracle cannot yet be named, record `ORACLE GAP` and what must resolve it before the cluster can be cut or the leaf claimed. Do not invent a test name to make the draft look complete. + +`Verification approach` distinguishes inner mechanism evidence, middle integration/contract evidence where applicable, and outer deployed/user-visible evidence. Outer verification is owned explicitly whenever the product advance is visible; it may be deferred only to a named owner with a re-entry trigger. + +`Risks and assumptions` records each consequential assumption with impact if false and the cheapest discriminating validation. `Accepted constraints and guarded invariants` names what must survive and its existing or required guard; stop-the-line invariants are explicit. `Expected touched paths` is a tentative directory/file-level manifest using `+`, `~`, `-`, and `?`, useful for scope/overlap detection but revisable when the real path exposes a better boundary. + +In `docs/mission-drafts/README.md`, use a four-backtick outer fence when embedding this three-backtick template. + +## Mission 8 reconciliation + +Inspect `ln/fe-1569-brunch-agent-deployment` rather than assuming the old prospective Mission 8 cluster landed. + +Observed branch status: + +- application artifact and local verification exist for Docker image, fail-closed Postgres configuration, IAM/static-password paths, TLS, content-free OTel, liveness, dual architecture, and container/Postgres/collector smoke; +- the mission explicitly stopped at application-to-infrastructure handoff; +- no confirmed ECS service, RDS database/role, hosted collector, restricted ingress, AWS credentials, real IAM probe, restricted Anthropic turn, task replacement recovery, remote telemetry inspection, rollback, or owner acceptance exists; +- the branch archives Mission 4 and installs Mission 8 as live authority, which conflicts with this branch’s still-live and subsequently deepened Mission 4. + +For every old Mission 8 subsection, classify content as: + +```text +landed application contract +still-open infrastructure/release gate +superseded proposal with surviving branch evidence +``` + +Keep only successor-relevant actual contracts and open gates in `MISSION.next.md`. Do not copy the deployment branch’s mission-history transition into this branch or imply remote deployment. Do not create a Mission 8 draft. + +## Full-fidelity migration + +Before editing, inventory current `AGENTS.md`, `MISSION.next.md`, `MISSION.md`, and mission-archive headings. Map every major current `MISSION.next.md` section to exactly one destination: + +```text +retained/condensed in MISSION.next.md +moved to one named mission draft +retained as unallocated/later backlog in MISSION.next.md +removed only as duplicate/history with explicit surviving evidence source +Mission 8 content classified through actual branch evidence +``` + +Preserve, without duplicate planning homes: + +- universal elicitation teaching backlog and baseline-gated edits; +- SDCPN investigation obligations, typology decisions, adversarial probes, and return-to-elicitation conditions; +- workpiece hypotheses, observed strain, cold-reader oracle, and rejected mechanism re-entry conditions; +- capture/workpiece seam alternatives and measurements; +- Mission 3’s accepted workpiece/falsified construction split and provider-schema evidence; +- Gherkin Shape C, rejected alternatives, evidence ladder, and reversal conditions; +- Dafny pairing, claim ladders, trust boundaries, vacuity concerns, and reversal conditions; +- observer mechanics only as contingent re-entry evidence, not a planned implementation; +- host choice, session identity, compaction, voice, observability, simulated-conversation viewing, simulation-backed checking, and `HarnessAgent` concerns; +- structured-question semantics and required model → binding → transport → frontend → correlated reply → resumed-turn vertical proof; +- standing locks for AI SDK, stock assistant coexistence, binding ownership, Flue-native composition, and no TUI/generalized runtime. + +Do not rely on `/tmp` or an external transcript as the surviving repository record. + +## `AGENTS.md` changes + +Change only the mission-planning contract needed to permit and govern `docs/mission-drafts/` and preserve earned planning precision: + +- preserve the three laws and six-section live mission contract; +- state that the six sections are required semantic addresses, not a maximum detail/template budget; +- require known precision to remain explicit when it changes builder behavior, scope, proof, risk, or handoff, including compact trees and flow diagrams where they make topology legible; +- permit nested cold-start reads, boundary crossings, risks/assumptions, oracle-bound acceptance leaves, guarded invariants, layered verification, cross-cutting obligations, expected touched paths, and readiness-ratchet sections inside the six-section contract; +- require final live mission/side-quest proof leaves to name their oracle; allow a provisional draft to name an `ORACLE GAP`, which must resolve before the leaf can be claimed; +- distinguish throughline proof, readiness gate, and stratum closure, including explicit ownership/oracles for obligations carried into the next visible product mission; +- encode the recursive survey → working line → dependable base → next survey model, where terrain claims require real-boundary evidence and a provisional line is never silently treated as a hardened departure base; +- permit the compact future spine, provisional mission drafts, and one bounded side quest as the only additional planning/control surfaces; +- define the combined future planning record across `MISSION.next.md` and linked drafts; +- require one authoritative planning home per item plus concise spine links; +- prohibit draft implementation before conversion; +- define promotion as re-evaluation and conversion, not rename; +- return material not admitted to the live cut at full fidelity; +- remove a consumed draft; +- compare all affected planning files before and after; +- preserve one issue = one branch = one PR and one live mission. + +## Draft lifecycle + +`docs/mission-drafts/README.md` must establish: + +1. Draft files are context repositories, not authority. +2. Before promotion, re-read evidence/dependencies and inspect the deployed boundary and accepted scenario portfolio. +3. Convert—not blindly rename—the selected draft into the six-section `MISSION.md` contract. +4. Return material not admitted to the cut to `MISSION.next.md` or another draft at full fidelity. +5. Remove the consumed draft so no duplicate quasi-authority remains. +6. Archive the eventual accepted live mission under existing `docs/mission-archive/`. + +## Precision and cold-start standard for this side quest + +This side quest itself is builder-facing authority. Preserve the detailed topology, Mission 8 evidence, migration obligations, and accepted mission boundaries above; do not collapse them into a shorter generic template during implementation. + +### Cold-start reads + +A fresh builder must read completely before editing: + +- [`AGENTS.md`](AGENTS.md) +- [`MISSION.md`](MISSION.md) +- [`MISSION.next.md`](MISSION.next.md) +- [`docs/mission-archive/README.md`](docs/mission-archive/README.md) +- deployment branch `ln/fe-1569-brunch-agent-deployment`: its `MISSION.md`, `MISSION.next.md`, `docs/evidence/implementations/mission-8-deployment-handoff.md`, Mission 4 archive, and archive README +- commit `bee37b5e47351c92bde4811187da211736efc6d0` and the v3 composition comparison it records + +These are pointers, not invitations to copy their content wholesale. + +### Risks and assumptions + +- RISK: condensation silently drops rejected alternatives, re-entry conditions, or named mechanisms → MITIGATION: build a before/after migration ledger and require one destination or explicit surviving evidence source for every source section. +- RISK: draft files read as concurrent authority → MITIGATION: path naming, warning header, prohibited final sections, AGENTS rules, and negative verification checks. +- RISK: Mission 8’s local application artifact is represented as deployed infrastructure → MITIGATION: reconcile every deployment subsection against branch evidence and retain the stopped-at-handoff qualification. +- RISK: added template detail becomes mandatory empty ceremony → MITIGATION: include earned precision, omit unearned optional subsections, and prohibit symmetric filler. +- ASSUMPTION: four mission drafts plus a compact shared spine are sufficient disclosure boundaries → IMPACT IF FALSE: either shared contracts duplicate or one draft accumulates unrelated branches → VALIDATE: after migration, inspect each file for one coherent invocation/consumer and stop rather than adding another document type automatically. + +### Invariants preserved + +- `MISSION.md` remains byte-identical — guarded by: pre/post SHA-256 and `git diff --exit-code -- MISSION.md`. +- One live execution authority remains unmistakable — guarded by: exact warning/header review and grep for prohibited draft `Status`, final `Imperative`, and final `Proof` headings. +- Every consequential future-planning item survives in one home — guarded by: source-heading/migration ledger plus named-mechanism, rejected-alternative, re-entry, fog, constraint, stop, scenario, and evidence-source inventories. +- Mission 8 remains a stopped application/infra handoff rather than a remote deployment claim — guarded by: comparison against the deployment branch mission and handoff evidence. +- Existing archive paths remain valid — guarded by: relative-link validation and no rename/move in git diff. + +### Verification approach + +- Inner: structural checks — exact files, required/prohibited headings, `MISSION.md` hash, Markdown fences, and relative links. +- Middle: semantic migration audit — every old section and named obligation has one destination; no full mission contract is duplicated in the compact spine. +- Outer: cold-start builder review — an independent reader can identify sole authority, locate each future mission’s full context, state its visible advance and readiness ratchet, and distinguish Mission 8’s landed application artifact from its open infrastructure proof. + +### Cross-cutting obligations + +- Preserve the product-visible mission law and FE-1476-as-floor distinction. +- Preserve core semantic authority with packaged-B runtime topology. +- Preserve mechanical capture versus semantic workpiece versus absent observer boundaries. +- Preserve Mission 8 security, durability, telemetry, stock-assistant, and exposure gates as actually evidenced. + +### Expected touched paths + +```text +libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/ +├── AGENTS.md ~ +├── MISSION.md unchanged +├── MISSION.next.md ~ +├── SIDE_QUEST.md - at close +└── docs/ + ├── mission-drafts/ + │ ├── README.md + + │ ├── 5-capture-backed-review.md + + │ ├── 6-traceable-projection.md + + │ ├── 7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md + + │ └── 9-optimisation-handoff.md + + └── mission-archive/ unchanged +``` + +## Throughline + +```text +freeze current planning inventory +→ create mission-draft authority/lifecycle README +→ create detailed drafts 5, 6, 7, and deliberately shallow 9 +→ migrate old Mission 5–7 material into accepted new boundaries +→ reconcile old Mission 8 material against actual branch evidence +→ rebuild MISSION.next.md as compact spine/shared frame/backlog index +→ update AGENTS.md planning rules +→ compare every source section and named mechanism before/after +→ verify authority, links, formatting, and one surviving home per item +→ record side-quest outcome +→ remove SIDE_QUEST.md +``` + +## Proof + +Observe all of the following: + +1. `MISSION.md` remains byte-identical and is called the sole execution authority everywhere. +2. Exactly four draft files exist: Missions 5, 6, 7, and 9. No Mission 4 or Mission 8 draft exists. +3. Every draft begins with the non-authority warning and contains no `Status`, final `Imperative`, or final `Proof` section. +4. `MISSION.next.md` presents the accepted M4–M9 spine, FE-1476 floor, unenumerated broader portfolio, tracer/readiness law, shared obligations/locks, actual Mission 8 handoff status, draft links, unallocated backlog, and later concerns without duplicating full draft contracts. +5. Mission 5/6/7/9 drafts preserve all accepted product boundaries, tracer floors, readiness obligations, constraints, fog, and stop conditions. +6. Every major old `MISSION.next.md` section has one recorded destination; every removal identifies a surviving evidence source and current consequence/re-entry condition. +7. Universal/SDCPN teaching, workpiece/seam hypotheses, Gherkin, Dafny, observer re-entry, host, compaction, voice, observability, simulation, structured questions, standing locks, and Mission 3 evidence remain discoverable at full semantic fidelity. +8. Mission 8 text matches the actual branch: application artifact locally verified, infrastructure deployment/replacement proof open, mission-history conflict explicit. +9. `AGENTS.md` permits the new topology while preserving one live mission and the branch/issue/PR law. +10. Every draft includes cold-start pointers sufficient for a new builder to resolve the cluster, explicit boundary crossings, the readiness ratchet from inherited stratum closure through new proof to successor admission, risks/assumptions, candidate oracles or named oracle gaps, guarded invariants, layered verification, cross-cutting obligations, and a tentative touched-path manifest wherever corresponding precision is already earned. +11. Every final side-quest acceptance leaf is bound to a named command, file/assertion, artifact inspection, or cold-reader check; no leaf relies on an unnamed future test or vibes. +12. All relative links resolve; no repository planning file links to `/tmp`; Markdown fences and tables render; prose is not hard-wrapped; repository formatting/checks pass. +13. A before/after semantic audit compares headings, named mechanisms, rejected alternatives, re-entry conditions, constraints, fog, stop conditions, scenario classes, and evidence sources, with no unexplained loss. +14. The active side quest is removed only after the split and outcome are recorded. + +This proof establishes a coherent planning information hierarchy. It does not execute a future mission, close Mission 4, remotely deploy Brunch, or promote production prompt/skill/workpiece code. + +## Constraints + +- Budget: **USD 0.00**. No paid model, judge, grader, or external service call. +- Do not edit `MISSION.md`. +- Do not alter frozen Mission 3 evidence or v1–v3 Flue composition evidence. +- Do not implement Missions 5–9, source topology, prompts, skills, tools, capture, projection, revision, observer, deployment, or frontend behavior. +- Do not move `docs/mission-archive/`. +- Do not create documents beyond the ratified topology. +- Do not create a Mission 8 draft or represent its handoff as completed remote deployment. +- Do not create a second backlog or standing-lock document. +- Keep each planning meaning in one authoritative home; spine summaries and links are pointers, not duplicated contracts. +- Preserve unexpected worktree changes and modify only files owned by this side quest. +- Use targeted edits and literal-path staging; do not broadly add unrelated files. + +## Stop or reorient + +Stop and report the smallest blocker if: + +- any current planning item cannot be assigned one honest destination; +- the split requires editing live `MISSION.md` to remain coherent; +- Mission 8 branch evidence cannot distinguish landed application contract from open infrastructure work; +- condensation would erase a rejected alternative, re-entry condition, scenario class, or evidence consequence; +- a draft begins to read as executable authority; +- the broader scenario portfolio must be invented rather than honestly marked unenumerated; +- additional document types appear necessary; +- or concurrent changes touch the same planning files and ownership cannot be established. + +Do not solve a blocker by duplicating material or weakening the one-live-mission rule. From ff33ff400496c53fa9daf80a784a1079a8b62997 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 11:19:58 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 036/101] mission re-lacing sidequest after 3 passes --- libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/AGENTS.md | 114 +-- libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md | 959 +++++------------- libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md | 495 --------- .../mission-drafts/5-capture-backed-review.md | 279 +++++ .../mission-drafts/6-traceable-projection.md | 317 ++++++ .../7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md | 239 +++++ .../mission-drafts/9-optimisation-handoff.md | 179 ++++ .../docs/mission-drafts/README.md | 68 ++ 8 files changed, 1374 insertions(+), 1276 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/5-capture-backed-review.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/6-traceable-projection.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/9-optimisation-handoff.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/README.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/AGENTS.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/AGENTS.md index 7f466897af4..e64cfff00d5 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/AGENTS.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/AGENTS.md @@ -24,77 +24,61 @@ from this file. ## Mission contract -When work starts on a branch, state these six things in [`MISSION.md`](MISSION.md) and copy them -into the branch/PR description. Do not create additional planning or control documents, except the -next-concerns draft and bounded side quest described below. +When work starts on a branch, state these six things in [`MISSION.md`](MISSION.md) and copy them into the branch/PR description. These sections are required semantic addresses, not a ceiling on detail or a fixed template budget. - **Imperative** — what must become true, and why now. - **Throughline** — the real entrypoint or boundary being changed. -- **Proof** — the observable evidence that would establish progress, and the claim it does not - make. A path, a connected skeleton, and a discharged contract are different completions. +- **Proof** — the observable evidence that would establish progress, and the claim it does not make. A path, a connected skeleton, and a discharged contract are different completions. - **Constraints** — the few already-earned truths that must stay true. -- **Fog-line** — uncertainty that current evidence cannot yet decide between consequential - alternatives, and must not be designed past. Clarifying intent is not clearing terrain. Capture - unresolved flags here: why they matter, what they constrain, and what would re-enter them. - Running the path may lengthen this list; that is calibration, not regression. +- **Fog-line** — uncertainty that current evidence cannot yet decide between consequential alternatives, and must not be designed past. Clarifying intent is not clearing terrain. Capture unresolved flags here: why they matter, what they constrain, and what would re-enter them. Running the path may lengthen this list; that is calibration, not regression. - **Stop or reorient** — evidence that invalidates or changes the route. -The six sections are the contract. Missions have also carried two additions that earned their -keep: a short **Status** header (live / accepted) above the contract, and a closing **Deferred** -section pointing at the draft. Keep both on future missions. - -### One live mission, next-concerns draft - -[`MISSION.md`](MISSION.md) is the only execution authority. Agents and humans implement against it. - -[`SIDE_QUEST.md`](SIDE_QUEST.md), when present, is one temporary, user-authorized experiment or -remediation inside the live mission. It is legitimate only when evidence from that mission has -exposed a bounded set of concrete residual failures whose investigation helps close the mission or -informs named later clusters. It must state its relationship to the live mission, imperative, -throughlines, proof, constraints, stop conditions, and budget for each paid activity. It must not -supersede or contradict `MISSION.md`, broaden into speculative future work, create a second live -mission, or coexist with another active side quest. Record its outcome in mission evidence and any -affected `MISSION.next.md` clusters, then remove the active side-quest file before archiving the -mission. - -[`MISSION.next.md`](MISSION.next.md) is the self-contained canonical capture repository for -upcoming work: the draft missions and the comprehensive record of ideas, observations, questions, -and named mechanisms already raised. It may hold a longer horizon than a single mission. It is not -a mission: do not implement it, do not treat it as a second concurrent mission, and do not declare -its focus until a cluster is cut. - -Update the draft during planning, design, grilling, or other mission elicitation while the context -is active. Keep every hypothesis, observation, question, and named mechanism at conversational -fidelity. A heading plus a one-line label is not a record of a design. Rejected alternatives and -the reason they lost belong next to the locked choice. Ungrilled fog stays marked unasked. The -draft must stand on its own; do not rely on or link to a transcript as a substitute for capturing -that content here. - -When regrouping or cutting, compare the draft before and after. Every item must either move into -the live mission or remain in the draft at the same fidelity. Once an elicitation session is over, -the draft — not an external transcript — is the source for future cuts. - -Group plausible future missions as ordered, numbered `# Mission N — …` headings. Spikes that are -not missions, standing lock / out-of-scope decisions, and a live mission's leftover / Deferred -items get their own unnumbered headings — they are not fake missions. Do not pre-fill Imperative, -Throughline, Proof, or Status on a cluster; those sections are the cut into `MISSION.md`. Record -Constraints, Fog-line, and Stop or reorient on a cluster only when the conversation already earned -them. - -A current mission's **Deferred** items belong in that draft as well. Do not silently drop or -supersede them when adding other concerns. - -When the current mission is accepted and the next focus is resolved: - -1. Move `MISSION.md` to `docs/mission-archive/{n}-{slug}.md`. -2. Cut a single focused `MISSION.md` from one cluster (the six-section contract above). -3. Leave everything that did not make the cut in `MISSION.next.md` at the same fidelity — still - hypotheses, still rejected alternatives, still named mechanisms. A cut is a copy of one cluster - into authority, not a summary of the remainder. - -Do not promote `MISSION.next.md` wholesale. Do not keep two live missions. Do not delete a closed -mission; the archive is evidence of what was proven, not marching orders. Re-earn before building -on it, same as an ADR. +The six sections are the live mission contract. Keep a short **Status** header (live / accepted) above the contract and a closing **Deferred** section pointing into the future planning record. + +Preserve known precision whenever it changes builder behavior, scope, proof, risk, or handoff. Nest cold-start reads, boundary crossings, risks and assumptions, oracle-bound acceptance leaves, guarded invariants, layered verification, cross-cutting obligations, expected touched paths, and readiness-ratchet sections under the six semantic addresses when earned. Compact trees and flow diagrams are welcome when they make topology or sequencing more legible; omit unearned symmetric filler. + +Every final proof leaf in a live mission or side quest must name a credible oracle: an exact test or command, fixture, artifact inspection, human witness, or adjudication that can distinguish the claimed result from mere presence. A provisional mission draft may instead mark `ORACLE GAP` and state what must resolve it, but that gap must close before the draft is cut with that leaf as a claim. + +### Throughline proof, readiness gate, and stratum closure + +- **Throughline proof** is the smallest deployed end-to-end path showing that a capability crosses the real product boundary. +- **Readiness gate** is the decision after that path works: enumerate the lateral obligations now exposed, decide which are required to trust the current visible capability, and identify which first become load-bearing for the next visible product advance. +- **Stratum closure** completes breadth, fidelity, invalid-state, durability, identity, failure, and oracle obligations across one named contract layer and accepted scenario or peer set. + +A vertical tracer does not automatically require horizontal completion. Close an obligation now when the current visible claim would otherwise be false or unsafe. Carry it only when the next visible product mission is its first real consumer, and name that owner, re-entry gate, and oracle; “later” is not a disposition. + +Use the recursive operating model: + +```text +survey the real territory, not only its maps +→ establish a working line of communication, transport, and evidence +→ stage a dependable camp/base by closing the contract stratum the line has made load-bearing +→ launch the next survey and throughline from that stronger departure point +``` + +Terrain claims require inspection or probes at the real production or deployed boundary. A working line crosses entry to visible exit with the least mechanism that carries product data, control, evidence, and failure. A dependable base closes only the earned coverage, identity, durability, recovery, observability, and oracle obligations required by accepted consumers. Never silently treat a provisional line as a hardened departure base, and do not fortify every adjacent contract merely because one route exposed it. + +This is an expeditionary posture, not a defensive one. Survey only until the next consequential and reversible move is warranted. Once downside is bounded or explicitly accepted, advance; uncertainty is terrain to reduce through action, not a reason to hold position. Stage only the base the next operation needs, not the safest or most complete base imaginable. + +### One live mission and bounded planning surfaces + +One Linear issue = one Graphite branch = one GitHub PR, and only one live mission may exist on that branch. [`MISSION.md`](MISSION.md) is the sole execution authority; agents and humans implement only against it. + +Only three additional planning or control surfaces are permitted: + +1. [`MISSION.next.md`](MISSION.next.md), the compact canonical future spine, shared frame, cross-mission constraints, and unallocated-backlog index. +2. Linked provisional drafts under [`docs/mission-drafts/`](docs/mission-drafts/), which preserve detailed cold-start context for named future clusters under the [draft authority and lifecycle rules](docs/mission-drafts/README.md). +3. `SIDE_QUEST.md`, when present, as the one temporary user-authorized experiment or remediation inside the live mission. + +`MISSION.next.md` and its linked provisional drafts form the combined future planning record. They are not execution authority, do not create concurrent missions, and must not be implemented before conversion into `MISSION.md`. Give every planning item one authoritative planning home; the compact spine may carry a concise summary and link, but must not duplicate the detailed contract. Keep each hypothesis, observation, accepted decision, rejected alternative and reason, re-entry condition, question, named mechanism, constraint, fog item, stop condition, scenario class, and evidence source at the fidelity needed for a cold-start builder. Do not rely on a transcript as the surviving record. + +A side quest is legitimate only when live-mission evidence exposes a bounded set of concrete residual failures whose investigation helps close that mission or informs named future clusters. It must state its relationship to the live mission, imperative, throughlines, oracle-bound proof, constraints, stop conditions, and budget for each paid activity. It must not supersede or contradict `MISSION.md`, broaden into speculative future work, create a second live mission, or coexist with another active side quest. Record its outcome in affected future-planning homes and in any mission evidence it produced, then remove the active file before archiving the mission. A documentation-only remediation that produces no separate implementation or evaluation evidence records its oracle-bound close audit in the canonical future-planning record rather than inventing another evidence document. + +### Conversion and lifecycle + +Promotion is re-evaluation and conversion, never a rename or wholesale promotion. The ordered conversion and archival procedure lives in [`docs/mission-drafts/README.md`](docs/mission-drafts/README.md#lifecycle). + +The always-loaded invariants are: keep exactly one live mission; return every item omitted from a cut to the combined future planning record at full fidelity; remove the consumed draft so it cannot remain duplicate quasi-authority; and compare every affected planning file before and after with no unexplained loss or duplication. A current mission's **Deferred** items belong in that record and must not be silently dropped or superseded. ## Correctives diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md index ea5a8e6c8cd..f0a028b04bb 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md @@ -1,46 +1,38 @@ -Self-contained canonical capture repository for upcoming missions: what we currently think we know about what to do next — ideas, observations, questions, and named mechanisms already raised. Not execution authority. Implement against [`MISSION.md`](MISSION.md). Do not promote this file wholesale. Do not keep two live missions in one branch. +# Brunch future mission spine -Plausible future missions are the ordered `# Mission N — …` headings. Imperative, Throughline, Proof, and Status wait until a cluster is cut into `MISSION.md`. Constraints, fog, and stop lines appear where prior discussion already earned them. Spikes, standing locks, out-of-scope decisions, and a live mission's leftovers get unnumbered headings — they are not fake missions. Update this file while planning context is active; it must carry full capture fidelity without relying on a transcript. When cutting or regrouping, compare this draft before and after: every item must either move into the live mission or remain here at the same fidelity. +> Canonical future-planning spine, shared frame, and backlog index only. This file is not execution authority and authorizes no implementation. [`MISSION.md`](MISSION.md) is the sole live authority. Detailed provisional clusters are context repositories, not missions; re-evaluate and convert one into `MISSION.md` before acting. -Archived Mission 2 is the mechanical capture pipe. Mission 3 is closed with a split result: the real Flue runbook and elicitation-to-workpiece path is the accepted control, while real-model semantic construction failed at the provider-schema boundary. Its frozen prospective campaign contains one invalid runtime member and two valid independently graded members; the campaign adjudication is the comparison input, not permission to rewrite observed artifacts. +This spine and its four linked drafts form one future-planning record. Keep each consequential meaning in one authoritative planning home: shared contracts and unallocated concerns live here; mission-specific detail lives in its draft. A spine pointer is not a second contract. Material omitted from a future cut returns to this record at full fidelity, and the consumed draft is removed. -Live Mission 4 is the owner-led runbook/workpiece redesign in [`MISSION.md`](MISSION.md), tracked by FE-1563. Do not implement another numbered cluster on this branch. The detailed Mission 5–8 clusters below are provisional based on current evidence; Mission 4's manual redesign may alter their workpiece assumptions and join contracts before they are cut. +## Current authority and accepted spine + +Mission 4 remains live on this branch. Its exit handoff is a selected frozen workpiece, exact source Flue conversation, exact candidate-instrument manifest, and comparative evaluation/adjudication. The parallel deployment branch's decision to archive Mission 4 and install Mission 8 as live authority is historical to that branch and is **not imported here**. + +Mission 4's `Deferred` paragraph was intentionally left unchanged by this documentation remediation and therefore retains the pre-split future numbering (projection/provenance as Mission 5, revision as Mission 6, rehearsal/handoff as Mission 7). This owner-ratified planning remediation supersedes only those future planning addresses with the accepted spine below; it does not alter Mission 4's live imperative, architecture, proof, or constraints. When a successor is eventually cut, use the linked draft numbering below and re-evaluate it into `MISSION.md`; do not infer that the unchanged `Deferred` labels authorize implementation. ```text -M1 chat (done) M2 mechanical capture (archived) M3 runbook/workpiece (closed) - └─ frozen prospective control -M4 owner-led, research-informed runbook/workpiece redesign (live) - ↓ informs the prepared artifact and seam -FE-1476 delivery spine -├─ M5 traceable prebuilt workpiece → live SDCPN → provenance answer beats 1–3 -├─ M6 bounded reviewer re-elicitation → revised workpiece → scoped patch beats 4–5 -├─ M7 whole-story rehearsal → optimisation handoff beat 6 -└─ M8 image/infra contract → restricted smoke → gated remote release container work may run in parallel; public join follows the exercised path - -Other asynchronous evidence tracks, admitted only when their boundary is stable -├─ provider-visible Petrinaut schema path -├─ inferential observer-fold spike -├─ provenance interaction against a fixture manifest -├─ host-choice and session-lifecycle probes where they do not block the first tracer -└─ Chris/Yannis handoff contract +M4 live — ship the accepted prompt/skill/workpiece architecture +M5 capture-backed review — ship a mechanical-evidence “why” answer over an honest prebuilt pair +M6 automatic projection — ship one meaningful region of traceable live SDCPN projection +M7 revision — ship bounded authorized reviewer revision and a scoped patch +M8 deployment handoff — stopped after local application proof, before infrastructure deployment +M9 optimisation — ship an accepted optimisation handoff after its consumer contract exists ``` -Parallel means separate issues, branches, or worktrees with their own mission authority, not several live missions in this file. A track is independently grabbable only after its input and output boundary is explicit. The shared contracts must be kept smaller than the work they coordinate; otherwise parallelism multiplies incompatible assumptions. +Every numbered mission from Mission 4 onward must produce a distinct visible advancement through the deployed Petrinaut/Brunch boundary once that boundary exists. Architecture, schema repair, fixtures, evaluation, rehearsal, and spikes may support that advancement but cannot be its sole outcome. Parallel work means separate issue, branch, PR, and mission authority; it never means multiple live missions here. -# FE-1476 delivery frame +## FE-1476 product frame -This is the current milestone frame, not a mission. The delivery window is the end of next week from the 2026-08-31 planning session. The target is the six-beat September review-and-revise story: +The 2026-08-31 planning session set the historical delivery window as the end of the following week. That date explains the original sequencing; it is not a live schedule lock. The six-beat review/revise story is the minimum integrated floor, not the product or demo ceiling: -1. Show a completed requirements artifact, pre-built from a prior elicitation; no live first interview. -2. A reviewer who is not the original expert examines the SDCPN projected from that artifact. -3. The reviewer asks why a part of the net was modelled that way and receives its provenance. -4. The reviewer conducts 3–5 turns of targeted re-elicitation against one section. -5. The net changes to match without an unrelated full rebuild. -6. The revised artifact is handed to Chris and Yannis for optimisation experiments. +1. Show a completed requirements artifact prebuilt from an earlier elicitation; do not stage a live first interview. +2. A reviewer other than the original expert examines the SDCPN projected from it. +3. The reviewer asks why a visible part was modelled that way and receives its provenance. +4. The reviewer conducts 3–5 focused re-elicitation turns against one section. +5. The net changes accordingly without unrelated rebuilding. +6. The revised artifact is handed to Chris and Yannis for an agreed optimisation experiment. -“Requirements graph” does not yet name a settled implementation. The current neutral term is **evidence-backed workpiece**: an inspectable/exportable representation between conversation evidence and the SDCPN. It may prove to be versioned assertion clusters, a stronger Markdown workpiece, or another shape exposed by the first real projection tracer. Do not turn the label “graph” into a graph database, closed ontology, or typed fold before the consumer requires one. - -The milestone requires three durable relationships even if their files or stores differ: +“Requirements graph” is not a settled implementation. Use **evidence-backed workpiece** for the inspectable/exportable semantic account between conversation evidence and SDCPN. The durable relationships are: ```text conversation evidence → workpiece meaning @@ -48,812 +40,347 @@ workpiece meaning → projection decision → SDCPN element workpiece revision → bounded net change ``` -The known delivery objects are therefore a workpiece, an SDCPN, and a provenance/derivation record connecting them to evidence. The known live operations are a provenance query and a bounded reviewer revision. Whether the provenance record is a standalone manifest or a view over persisted links remains fog. - -## Confidence map - -### High confidence — observed or owner-settled - -- FE-1476's six beats are the milestone target. -- The production door remains Petrinaut panel → AI SDK transport → Flue `ChatAgent`; Brunch is a second assistant, not a replacement for the stock modeller. -- A Flue conversation can activate the packaged runbook skill, read phase-specific resources, and emit a recoverable Markdown workpiece. -- Mission 2 proved an idempotent, model-free capture pipe over real Flue history with source excerpts and empty payloads. -- Petrinaut owns net schemas, mutations, parser behavior, and simulation contracts; Brunch must consume those contracts rather than copy their field shapes. -- A parser-valid empty net is vacuous. Delivery requires non-empty semantic inspection as well as schema acceptance. -- FE-1476 requires a traceable relationship among net elements, workpiece meaning, and conversation evidence; complete production independence between those artifacts cannot satisfy the story. -- Ordinary elicitation turns must not wait on foreground semantic sweep/fold work or return to Condition 5's minute-scale latency. - -### Medium confidence — plausible first mechanisms, not yet proven - -- Stable, versioned, evidence-backed assertion clusters may be a sufficient workpiece without a comprehensive domain ontology. -- A model-assisted projector can consume those clusters and emit both canonical Petrinaut mutations and an auditable derivation record. -- Stable caller-supplied workpiece and net-element identifiers may be enough to keep a selected revision local. -- SDCPN recognition guidance can offer non-authoritative entity/relationship mapping hints without making those hints a required semantic schema. -- Reprojecting or reconsidering a selected region and applying a bounded patch may satisfy “the net changes without a full rebuild”; the exact internal scope permitted by the delivery owner is not yet pinned. -- An asynchronous observer may consolidate settled evidence without blocking the foreground and may feed the revision operation after an explicit flush barrier. +The broader scenario portfolio has not been enumerated. At each mission cut, name the accepted scenarios and contract classes honestly; “all scenarios” means that named portfolio, never every imaginable operational process. -### Low confidence — must alter the next move +Low-confidence questions must change the next move rather than harden into architecture: the stable granularity and identity of workpiece meaning; whether foreground or any later observer revision preserves correction, qualification, and conflict; whether optional mapping hints help projection or bias synthesis; whether the live provider path preserves nested Petrinaut schemas; whether one region can be revised without unrelated churn; whether a reviewer may supersede meaning or only propose a change; whether net create/save/load supplies sufficient identity; whether compaction preserves workpiece/evidence recovery; and the exact Chris/Yannis optimisation contract. -- The appropriate granularity and identity stability of consolidated assertions. -- Whether observer consolidation preserves prior supported meaning while incorporating corrections, qualifications, and conflicts. -- Whether SDCPN mapping hints help projection more than they bias evidence consolidation. -- Whether the live Flue/provider path can expose Petrinaut's canonical nested schemas to the model. The paid construction run went 0-for-9 on `addType.elements` and yielded an empty net. -- Whether model-assisted projection can revise one linked region without unrelated net churn. -- Whether a reviewer who is not the original expert may directly supersede prior meaning or only propose a revision. -- Whether net create/save/load provides the identity and continuity FE-1476 needs. -- Whether compaction preserves evidence/workpiece recovery; this is important beyond the short rehearsal but not yet earned as a blocker for the first tracer. -- The exact optimisation artifact and scenario contract Chris and Yannis require. +### Tracer floor and contract readiness -## Cross-milestone proof obligations +Use three distinct claims: -These obligations belong to the milestone. Each mission should take only the first unproven subset it can discharge through the real boundary. - -1. **Workpiece sufficiency:** A cold reader can identify the model's objective, reconstruct the relevant operational account, distinguish evidence from inference/assumption, and locate consequential unresolved material. -2. **Projection fidelity:** The SDCPN is produced from the workpiece rather than by rereading the transcript as the primary model. Every consequential net region names the workpiece material and projection rationale that produced it. -3. **Evidence provenance:** A reviewer can start from a visible net element and reach the relevant current workpiece assertion or passage and its actual conversation evidence. Normalized model prose is not laundered into a user quotation. -4. **Revision integrity:** New reviewer evidence produces an inspectable workpiece revision that preserves prior supported meaning unless it is explicitly corrected, qualified, split, merged, or retired. -5. **Patch locality:** Applying the selected revision changes the intended net region, retains unrelated stable identities and behavior, and reports any necessary expansion of impact rather than silently rebuilding the world. -6. **Petrinaut acceptance:** The revised net satisfies canonical schemas, is non-empty, survives semantic inspection against the workpiece, and is usable by the optimisation consumer. Parser acceptance alone is insufficient. -7. **Interaction quality:** The reviewer can ask why and conduct 3–5 focused turns in the real panel without construction vocabulary taking over the conversation or observer work blocking ordinary turns. -8. **Failure visibility:** Provider-schema failure, observer lag if the observer is selected, unsupported projection, unresolved authority, and failed patch validation stop or visibly degrade the operation; none silently advances canonical state. - -## Mechanism restraint - -The target does not currently earn a comprehensive process-domain ontology, graph database, universal subject/predicate/value schema, deterministic capture-to-model fold, typed completion algebra, or full regeneration engine. Semantic interpretation is unavoidable; the design question is where it occurs and how it remains inspectable. - -The current candidate separates three epistemic levels: +- **Throughline proof:** the smallest deployed end-to-end path showing that product data, control, evidence, and failure cross the real boundary. +- **Readiness gate:** after that path works, decide which lateral obligations are now enumerable, which must close for the visible claim to be trustworthy, and which first become load-bearing for the next advancement. +- **Stratum closure:** complete breadth, fidelity, invalid-state, durability, identity, failure, and oracle obligations across one named contract layer and accepted scenario/peer set. ```text -what conversation evidence supports -what SDCPN-relevant structures guidance suggests might be present -what the projector actually represented in the net +survey the real territory, not only its maps +→ establish a working line through the real boundary +→ stage a dependable base by closing the now-load-bearing stratum +→ launch the next survey and throughline ``` -The previous typed-map cluster (formerly numbered Mission 5) proposed required fields and unresolved gaps that would mechanically derive ask / construct / deliver. That remains a recorded hypothesis, not the new default. It re-enters only if the workpiece-to-projection tracer or construction-gap return demonstrates that model-assisted judgment cannot reliably name the smallest next question without typed demands. - -Optional mapping hints are advisory. A workpiece item may have none or several; the projector may accept, reject, or defer them. Hints do not establish completeness and do not duplicate Petrinaut payload fields. If the first real tracer works from evidence-backed prose without hints, do not add them for symmetry. - -# Retained teaching, workpiece, and seam backlog - -Not missions. These are the self-contained research and prior-design findings that must remain available when a later mission is cut. FE-1476 changes their priority and gives provenance/revision a present consumer; it does not turn any proposed mechanism into observed fact. - -## Universal teaching backlog and baseline-gated edits - -The supported universal core is objective-relative interviewing: establish intended questions, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, non-claims, and tolerance for assumptions; begin with one concrete occasion and walk it before generalizing; preserve expert statement, inference, assumption, unknown, not-yet-asked, conflict, correction, omission, and loss; treat divergence as information; spend questions by information value; and stop on evidence-bearing criteria rather than fluency, headings, fatigue, or turn count. - -Candidate moves present in the research but without a reliable current home include: - -- A closing clearinghouse probe: ask what important thing was not asked before any completion claim. -- An anchored-hypothetical precondition: vary a real narrated incident rather than inviting idealized policy through free-floating hypotheticals. -- A clairvoyant definitional test before recording a quantity: define it so perfect knowledge rather than judgment could answer it. -- Contrastive and discriminating probes, including expert-versus-novice contrast, to surface cues and operational distinctions. -- A long-range consistency probe using the full conversation rather than only adjacent answers. -- A depth policy that does not accept the first answer on a load-bearing fact, while avoiding a universal turn-count rule. -- A guard against vague elicitor questions; the literature synthesis identified question vagueness as the most frequent human-interviewer mistake in its cited sample. -- Explicit exception and absence sweeps rather than treating unmentioned material as absent. -- Declined-to-answer, deferred, unknown-to-user, not-yet-decided, not-applicable, and explicitly absent as different outcomes. The current runbook IR has no clean exercised home for all of them. -- An anti-leading guard and premortem phrasing for failure-focused objectives. -- The correction discriminator: ask whether a new account corrects the old one or whether both apply under different conditions. - -Known duplication and vague guidance should constrain edits. Caveat/rabbit-hole prose overlaps failure catalogs; the restatement rule appears in several homes; typology children duplicate the last-time probe; and failure lists already repeat source catalogs. “High appetite,” “several turns produce nothing new,” and “deepen before recording” are too vague unless tied to observable behavior or an end state. Do not grow a second catalog to fix those problems. - -The main unresolved teaching calls are placement and dosage, not whether the concerns exist: the 2–4 batching guidance failed to prevent 4–10-question opening batteries because both runs asked before reading `elicitation.md`; one-question versus small shared-frame batch remains unsettled; posture collection can become an intake form; clarification versus deeper case probing remains situational; quantitative/tail scripts, closing cadence, and assent semantics need discriminating probes. The frozen prospective baseline must remain unchanged long enough to measure the current package. Teaching edits follow or run in a separately versioned campaign; they do not silently contaminate the baseline. - -## SDCPN investigation backlog - -The objective-relative investigation floor is a known slice with named holes, not every IR heading or a complete semantic model. Candidate guidance should preserve these obligations in operational vocabulary: - -1. Intended decision/comparison/worry, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and what the model must not claim. -2. One concrete occasion from trigger to end, including what flows, prerequisites, main activities, ordering, and outputs. -3. Per load-bearing input, distinguish consumed, reserved then released, or merely read/inspected; for scarce reusable inputs, ask capacity and simultaneous-demand behavior. -4. Who or what decides branches and contention; distinguish written policy from practiced behavior and retain overrides, retries, failures, recovery, and conflict. -5. Objective-relevant timing, typical and tail behavior, hidden waits, calendars, arrivals, directional losses, grouping/splitting, thresholds, and changing conditions. -6. Expert evidence, assumptions, unknowns, not-yet-asked items, conflicts, corrections, omissions, and projection limits without hardening assent, policy, hedges, or incidents into precise practiced values. -7. What observation would make the result trustworthy and which operational alternatives the expert wants compared. -8. A reconstructable process spine sufficient for construction to name the smallest consequential gap rather than fill it silently. - -Typology decisions remain provisional and strain-gated: - -- Keep the six current question shapes. Complete Grouped movement, whose questioning is thinner than its siblings. -- Strengthen Timed work to distinguish working from waiting before adding hidden waiting as a separate typology. -- Split Mode change's directional loss into time, material, availability, and what cannot run next. -- Threshold crossing does not cover condition-dependent duration, failure, or loss rate. Add the operational probe “does its state change how long or how often?” under properties/time or continuous-change guidance before promoting a new default type. -- Treat external arrival/demand as an explicit throughput trigger before adding a seventh default typology. Promote only if prospective throughput cases repeatedly omit arrivals. -- Do not add queue/waiting, priority/deadline, or escalation/approval typologies merely because those distinctions can matter; they currently overlap existing resource, branch, trigger, and lens guidance. -- A numeric threshold is mandatory only when the expert uses one or the objective depends on it; a judgeable objective does not always require a number. -- Unclear release of a reserved scarce resource is a construction blocker when alternate semantics change the objective; otherwise retain a conspicuous assumption. - -The short candidate return-to-elicitation list remains: missing objective; missing spine; unclear fate of a capped resource; policy without practiced contention; missing arrival account under a throughput objective; or missing tail behavior where the objective depends on tails. Mission 3 did not exercise this loop, so the list is a probe, not typed completion. - -The adversarial probe catalog remains available: policy versus practice; shared-resource contention; hidden waiting stored as processing time; directional changeover loss; a rare incident mistaken for a rate; unknown distribution forced into a named family; grouped work that may split; and a continuous quantity that crosses no threshold while still changing a relevant rate. Newcomer, borderline-case, same-situation/different-objective, evidence-order perturbation, and true correction after apparent readiness are useful additions. Probe metadata should distinguish acquisition miss, conservation miss, and simulator nondisclosure. - -The `Transform to PN` children still belong conceptually to construction, but two historical runs did not show vocabulary leakage. Move them only in an instrumented teaching variant; survival is weak evidence, not a license to keep duplicate construction knowledge indefinitely. - -## Workpiece structure hypotheses and observed strain - -Observed in both real Mission 3 artifacts: the Markdown IR was composed wholesale near the end rather than maintained incrementally. The six-mark epistemic vocabulary was useful, but labels did not prevent agent-authored values from reading like expert testimony or never-asked material from being filed as user unknowns. `Situation notes` aided retrieval and also duplicated other sections. `Projection losses` mixed elicitation gaps, construction choices, and genuine representational loss; the loss register should open at construction rather than speculate during elicitation. Assumptions often omitted the required reason and how-to-check. Inline and bulk unsettled marks had no authoritative home. “Not applicable” and “declined” were not exercised. Context-dependent quantities, especially directional values, were difficult to reconstruct from flat prose. - -Candidate structures remain hypotheses: - -- **A — case/process spine plus epistemic ledger:** one concrete flow carries operational context; a light ledger is the sole home for unresolved claims, assumptions, conflicts, and next questions. -- **B — entity/resource-centric register:** repeated entries make per-entity, product, direction, and quantity context easier to locate, at the cost of more semantic organization. -- **C — current shape split by authorship and phase:** retain broad headings but distinguish expert-given, agent-assumed with reason/check, construction-decided, elicitation gap, and construction-opened loss. This is the lowest-change control. -- **D — append-only journal:** retained only to bound the design space. It conflicts with the current maintained-workpiece intent and has no observed correction lifecycle strong enough to justify its cold-reading burden. -- **Objective slices, cases, then residue:** organize around the questions the model must answer, with supporting cases, evidence, assumptions, blockers, validation, and smallest next questions. This remains an alternate emphasis rather than a proven winner. -- **Versioned assertion clusters:** the current FE-1476 conversation adds this candidate: coherent evidence-backed prose units with revision lineage and optional advisory mapping hints. Its granularity and stability remain low-confidence. - -A transcript-blind reviewer should be able to state the objective; reconstruct the process and order; separate expert evidence, inference, assumption, unknown, and conflict; name unresolved contradictions; identify the smallest next questions; judge construction readiness without inventing the spine; and spot-check a claim's epistemic standing and typical-versus-tail shape. Historical cold reviews now calibrate some of these tasks, but successive revision and observer-fold behavior remain untested. - -Keep objective, boundary/horizon, concrete cases, practiced-versus-prescribed distinctions, contextual quantities, resources/contention, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, validation, and named losses. Move PN transformation knowledge into construction. Rewrite phase-mixed gap/loss material and formulaic closing claims. Cut duplicate summaries only after one authoritative home is proven. - -Rejected mechanisms retain their re-entry conditions: - -- Closed kind catalogs, slots, demand rows, and precision ladders re-enter only if the projector repeatedly cannot find consequential meaning in evidence-backed prose and advisory hints. -- Typed completion algebra re-enters only if evidence-based checks repeatedly allow unsupported readiness or cannot name the smallest next question. -- Per-statement epistemic enums re-enter only if prose/revision discipline repeatedly launders authorship or uncertainty despite targeted checks. -- Typed per-capture loss categories re-enter only if projection decisions cannot be audited through an explicit construction-opened loss account. -- Capture envelope → typed fold, `firesWhen`, motif/plugin/repertoire runtime, and one-artifact merger remain rejected until a real second consumer or observed failure requires their mechanism. - -## Prior capture/workpiece seam hypotheses and unrun probes - -The prior research compared four relationships; FE-1476 does not erase their evidence: - -- **A — complete production independence:** zero Condition 5 exposure and fully consistent with Missions 2–3, but cannot by itself answer FE-1476's required net-to-evidence provenance query. High synthesis fan-in and high context dependence would still support independence outside the delivery-specific derivation record. -- **B — support links only:** the smallest prior join, improving auditability without making capture the workpiece. Offline links require only evaluation-local statement identity; durable live links require workpiece identity stable across revisions. FE-1476 currently makes this family the nearest relevant hypothesis, but does not decide its storage form. -- **C — capture fold proposes workpiece updates:** presupposes semantic interpretation, ordered lifecycle, and update authority. It was unproven and carried more Condition 5 exposure. The inferential observer spike is a new, asynchronous version of this question, not proof that the fold is warranted. -- **D — one artifact:** capture payloads and editable workpiece entries merge. This remains refused because immutable evidence and editable semantic synthesis have different lifecycles and because it most closely recreates the prior latency/complexity failure shape. - -The prior offline shadow join remains an available non-critical-path probe: run Mission 2-style capture over a settled Mission 3 range, assign temporary ids to material workpiece statements, and grade evidence relation, epistemic treatment, lifecycle relation, and projection treatment separately. Do not collapse these into one mutually exclusive class or count explicit assumptions as evidence support. - -Useful measurements remain support coverage, synthesis fan-in, capture utility, context dependence, correction integrity, path sensitivity, and link churn across workpiece revisions. High coverage with fan-in near one and low context dependence weakens complete independence and supports links. High fan-in/context dependence supports keeping evidence ledger and semantic workpiece distinct. A fold becomes plausible only if order perturbation yields equivalent active meaning without in-loop latency and if the elicitor does not need to consult every fold. Deeper merger would require capture idempotency and editable-workpiece semantics to agree across correction, split/merge, and revision—currently unlikely. - -The former recommendation was production independence plus offline shadow mapping. FE-1476 supersedes independence only as a sufficient **delivery posture**, because visible provenance and revision are now owner-required. It does not prove a capture-store fold, one-artifact merger, live in-loop support linker, or comprehensive statement-identity system. The observer and derivation-record tracks are the smallest new probes against that changed obligation. - -# Mission 5 — traceable projection through the real panel - -The first unproven boundary is not a complete requirements graph. It is one evidence-backed workpiece item becoming one semantically meaningful live-net region whose provenance a reviewer can inspect through the production panel. - -A candidate tracer uses a fixed prior conversation and a deliberately prepared minimal workpiece item. The Brunch agent consumes that item, invokes the canonical Petrinaut client-tool path, creates or updates one non-empty net region with stable caller-supplied ids, records the derivation from workpiece item to net elements, and answers one “why was this modelled this way?” query by returning the workpiece account plus actual evidence excerpts. The tracer must not reread the whole transcript to invent the answer. - -Only after that path works should the mission broaden to the completed prebuilt workpiece and SDCPN needed for beats 1–3. A hand-prepared or one-off model-assisted fixture is legitimate for the first tracer if its provenance is explicit; pretending it is the final observer output is not. - -## Constraints already earned - -- Use the real Petrinaut panel, AI SDK transport, Flue `ChatAgent`, and existing `onToolCall` client execution. Do not create a second UI, server, or direct canvas bypass. -- Brunch prompting and recognition guidance remain Brunch-owned. Petrinaut schemas and payload shapes remain Petrinaut-owned and must be imported or generated mechanically. -- Start with the smallest canonical mutation subset that crosses the tracer. Do not absorb the stock modeller's full 46-tool catalog. -- The model may interpret evidence-backed prose. Do not disguise that inference as deterministic compilation. -- A derivation record must name workpiece item revisions, evidence references, net element ids, and projection rationale. Its exact storage shape is fog until the tracer exposes what the panel and revision consumer need. -- Construction success requires provider-visible schemas, non-empty output, semantic correspondence to the workpiece, and no unsupported consequential defaults. -- Stable ids must be exercised across at least one repeat projection or edit. Do not assume model-minted identity survives. -- The initial tracer does not require the asynchronous observer, a generic assertion fold, compaction, remote deployment, or a complete optimisation model. - -## Fog-line - -- Whether the current Markdown workpiece can host a stable evidence-backed item or whether a separate versioned assertion-card artifact is the smallest sufficient input. -- Whether the live client-tool route already exposes canonical Petrinaut schemas in a provider-visible form, avoiding the failed headless Valibot `looseObject` + `rawTransform` bridge. If not, determine whether Flue can accept Standard Schema or supplied JSON Schema, whether a shape-preserving Zod-to-Valibot conversion is the smallest path, or whether this is an upstream Flue requirement. -- Repair-loop behavior after canonical schema rejection: correction budget, stop condition, and whether provider-visible shape plus rejection messages are sufficient to recover from the recorded 0-for-9 failure. -- Petrinaut-core's file-format schemas and `action-schemas.ts` are separate families aligned by hand. The tracer depends on that alignment; a mismatch routes upstream rather than becoming a Brunch prose copy. -- Whether consuming the current last-`runbook-ir`-fence scrape is sufficient for the tracer or the evidence-backed workpiece becomes the first durable consumption contract. This interacts with compaction but does not justify designing persistence before the first projection. -- The smallest net region that is semantically meaningful and visually inspectable rather than a toy place/transition pair. -- How a reviewer identifies a net element for a provenance question: click context, explicit element name/id, or another existing panel affordance. -- Whether the derivation record travels with the workpiece, the net, or as a generated companion manifest. -- Whether a full desired net may be recomputed internally if only the stable diff is applied, or whether the delivery contract requires genuinely local projection computation. -- How much host-choice UI is necessary for this tracer versus a fixed Brunch mode. - -## Stop or reorient - -- Stop if the tracer requires inventing the complete assertion ontology before one item can project. -- Stop if canonical Petrinaut schemas must be manually copied into Brunch. -- Stop if the agent can only construct by rereading the transcript rather than consuming the workpiece item. -- Stop if provenance is generated as plausible prose without mechanical links to retained evidence. -- Stop if parser success can pass on an empty or semantically unrelated net. -- Stop if the first repeat projection churns unrelated identifiers and the smallest identity pin cannot explain why. -- Stop if panel integration requires Brunch-specific logic inside the Petrinaut library rather than an application-level or generic host extension. - -# Mission 6 — bounded reviewer revision to scoped net patch - -After Mission 5 establishes one traceable projection, the next mission proves beats 4–5: a reviewer who is not the original expert conducts one bounded 3–5-turn re-elicitation against that region; the system records a source-linked revision of the relevant workpiece meaning; and the Brunch agent applies a validated patch whose impact is limited to the linked net region or explicitly widened with a reason. - -The mission should begin from the Mission 5 artifact and one deliberately chosen revision with observable consequences. It is not a general correction platform. The chosen revision must be rich enough to distinguish simple overwrite from qualification, contextual coexistence, conflict, or genuine supersession; otherwise it will not test the workpiece's claimed value. - -The mechanism that creates the workpiece revision remains fog. The observer spike informs but does not block the choice and need not succeed. Candidates are an explicit phase-boundary synthesis by the foreground agent, an asynchronously consolidated assertion revision if the spike earns promotion, or the smallest combination that preserves evidence and meets latency. The mission does not assume a generic deterministic fold. +A tracer is not automatically a hardened base, and one green element, region, or correction does not close a mission. Close an obligation now when the current visible claim would otherwise be false or unsafe. Carry it only when the next visible consumer first makes it load-bearing, naming owner, re-entry gate, and oracle. Do not sweep every adjacent contract merely because one route exposed it. -## Constraints already earned +This is an expeditionary posture, not a defensive one. Survey only until the next consequential and reversible move is warranted. Once downside is bounded or explicitly accepted, advance; uncertainty is terrain to reduce through action, not a reason to hold position. Stage only the base the next operation needs, not the safest or most complete base imaginable. -- Ordinary review questions stay on the foreground runbook path and do not wait for semantic sweep/fold work. -- Before canonical workpiece or net state changes, all evidence required for that revision must be durably present and the responsible interpretation must be explicit. -- Preserve the previous workpiece revision and its evidence. A new account must not erase history merely because it is more recent. -- Reviewer authority must be represented honestly. A tentative proposal or unresolved contradiction must not silently become canonical expert truth. -- The patch consumes the current workpiece revision and current net, not the transcript as an unbounded fallback. -- Existing net ids outside the declared impact remain stable. New ids and impact expansion are reported. -- Validate through Petrinaut's canonical contracts and inspect semantic behavior against the selected revision. Tool-call success is not patch success. -- Do not make the observer, capture store, and workpiece one artifact merely to shorten the path. +### Cross-mission proof obligations -## Fog-line +- **Workpiece sufficiency:** a cold reader can identify the objective, reconstruct the operational account, distinguish evidence from inference/assumption, and locate consequential unresolved material. +- **Projection fidelity:** projection consumes the workpiece, not the transcript as primary IR; each consequential region identifies producing meaning and rationale. +- **Evidence provenance:** visible element → current workpiece meaning → mechanically retained exact conversation evidence, without laundering normalized prose into quotation. +- **Revision integrity:** new attributed evidence produces an inspectable revision that preserves prior supported meaning unless explicitly corrected, qualified, split, merged, retired, or retained in contextual conflict. +- **Patch locality:** intended region changes, unrelated identities and behavior remain stable, and legitimate impact widening is reported. +- **Petrinaut semantic acceptance:** canonical schemas accept a non-empty net whose behavior and meaning correspond to the workpiece; parser acceptance alone is vacuous. +- **Deployed interaction quality:** the real panel supports the why operation and focused review without construction vocabulary or background work taking over ordinary turns. +- **Visible failure:** provider-schema failure, unsupported or unavailable projection/evidence, stale observer state if ever admitted, unresolved authority, failed mutation or patch validation, and failed canonical validation stop or visibly degrade the operation; none silently advances canonical workpiece or net state. -- Whether the reviewer can commit corrections directly, creates proposals pending confirmation, or has authority that varies by statement. -- Whether assertion-card revisions are stable enough across observer or foreground synthesis to anchor projection links. -- What counts as a sufficiently local patch when one operational change legitimately affects several connected net elements. -- Whether a selected workpiece item plus its linked net neighborhood gives the projector enough context without the full workpiece. -- Whether mapping hints should be persisted on workpiece revisions, generated after consolidation, or omitted because projection rationales suffice. -- The explicit synchronization point for an asynchronous observer: forced tail sweep and queue flush before revision commit is the current candidate, not a settled mechanism. +## Shared constraints and standing locks -## Stop or reorient +### Evidence, workpiece, capture, and projection -- Stop if the revision path requires every conversation turn to block on extraction, typing, fold, completion, and projection. -- Stop if a changed prose item causes unrelated net regeneration with no detectable impact boundary. -- Stop if the reviewer can accidentally launder uncertainty into authoritative correction. -- Stop if previous evidence or projection rationale disappears after revision. -- Stop if the implementation grows a comprehensive semantic ontology to support one selected correction. -- If an observer is selected, stop if its failure or lag can produce a patch from stale evidence without a visible barrier. +Flue history is the canonical conversation log. Mechanical capture envelopes are immutable, exact-evidence, domain-opaque source records; the foreground Markdown workpiece owns semantic synthesis. Projection consumes the current workpiece. Petrinaut owns canonical net schemas, mutations, parsing, and simulation; Brunch imports or mechanically derives those contracts and never hand-copies their field shapes. -# Mission 7 — complete FE-1476 rehearsal and optimisation handoff +Mission 2 proved an idempotent model-free sweep: one envelope per user utterance, quote equal to source text, payload `{}`. The production runbook path still does not invoke capture. Mission 5 is the first accepted consumer that turns capture into product data, so capture must become durable before that claim is made; task-local JSON is forbidden across any claimed process/task replacement boundary. -After traceable projection and bounded revision are separately proven, broaden only enough to rehearse the complete six-beat story with the prebuilt artifact, the reviewer-facing panel, the selected revision, and the optimisation handoff. - -This mission owns integration breadth and staging, not a new semantic architecture. It should make a human witness able to decide whether the story works from the visible panel and exported artifacts. It may absorb only the host continuity and presentation work the rehearsal exposes as necessary. - -The completed artifact need not represent every Vestera fact. It must carry a coherent objective-relative slice sufficient for the selected SDCPN and optimisation experiment, with assumptions, omissions, and projection losses visible. The handoff must name what Chris and Yannis can run, which scenario/parameters accompany the net, and which claims remain provisional. - -## Constraints already earned - -- Keep the stock Petrinaut assistant working when Brunch is unavailable or not selected. Brunch remains a second assistant. -- The panel stays on `useChat` / `onToolCall`; do not rewrite it onto `@flue/react`. -- Do not splice stock and Brunch conversations. A mode choice may route them, but their histories remain distinct. -- Use the prebuilt artifact for the first beat; do not turn the rehearsal into a live first interview. -- No remote exposure while FE-1423's authentication, telemetry, state-versioning/backup, and restart-durability gates remain open. A local or preview rehearsal must be labelled accordingly. -- The optimisation handoff uses Petrinaut's published artifact/scenario boundary rather than coupling the two libraries. -- Presenter-grade polish follows proof of the visible state changes; it cannot substitute for them. - -## Fog-line - -- The exact picker location and whether mode can switch mid-net or only at start. -- Whether net id is a sufficient conversation discriminator for the rehearsal. Current localStorage maps conversation ids by `netId`, but save/load identity has not been proven. -- The smallest provenance presentation: answer in chat, linked detail panel, net-element selection, or exported manifest view. -- The exact artifact, scenario, parameter, and execution assumptions required by Chris and Yannis. -- Whether the delivery is local, preview-deployed, recorded, or live. Remote production gates do not disappear under deadline pressure. -- Which semantic checks are required before optimisation may treat the net as credible. - -## Stop or reorient - -- Stop if rehearsal defects expose a missing contract in Missions 5–6; fix the shared boundary rather than scripting around it in the demo. -- Stop if host choice rewrites or destabilizes the stock assistant. -- Stop if the handoff consumer must reconstruct model intent from the original transcript. -- Stop if optimisation runs against a net that passed only parser shape and not the workpiece-specific semantic checks. -- Stop if deployment bypasses the ratified remote-release gates. - -# Mission 8 — containerize and safely deploy Brunch on HASH infrastructure - -This cluster is the self-contained candidate successor for the deployment work currently tracked by FE-1441 and gated by FE-1423. It records the 2026-09-01 application and monorepo audit rather than assuming that “there is a Docker container” is the whole deployment contract. Container correctness, a restricted infrastructure smoke deployment, and public remote release are distinct thresholds. Container and infrastructure-contract work may proceed in a separate worktree while Missions 5–7 establish the product path, but the public routing/release join must consume the exercised path rather than inventing one in deployment. A cut may narrow to the first two thresholds only if the result is explicitly private and disposable; it may not call that public deployment or silently inherit the later gates. - -The least deployment shape is a long-running Node/Flue HTTP service on HASH infrastructure, initially one live replica, with Anthropic egress and durable conversation storage. The public product path remains Petrinaut panel → AI SDK HTTP transport → Brunch Flue `ChatAgent`; Brunch remains a second assistant rather than replacing the stock Petrinaut modeller. HASH Graph, Temporal, Redis, the HASH API, S3, and Petrinaut Optimizer are not current Brunch runtime dependencies and must not be added for symmetry. - -The current repository does not contain production Terraform, ECS task definitions, load balancer configuration, runtime secret declarations, or backup policy. It contains local Compose and a GitHub workflow that builds/publishes known images and force-redeploys pre-existing ECS services. Infrastructure provisioning therefore remains a handoff to Tim's infrastructure authority or another repository; this mission must record the external artifact and owner rather than pretending a workflow catalog entry creates the service. - -## Observed starting point - -These are high-confidence facts observed at the real local boundary unless a qualification says otherwise. - -- `yarn workspace @apps/brunch-agent build` emits `dist/server.mjs`, the server chunk, `dist/app.mjs`, and a built browser client under `dist/client/`. Starting `node apps/brunch-agent/dist/server.mjs` with a temporary `PORT` succeeded, bound `*:PORT`, served `/` with HTTP 200, and created SQLite `conversations.db`, `-wal`, and `-shm` files. This proves the generated Node entry can start; it does not prove container correctness, provider calls, restart recovery, remote safety, or deployment infrastructure. -- The generated server reads `PORT`, defaults to `3000`, installs graceful `SIGINT`/`SIGTERM`/disconnect handling, and gives shutdown up to 60 seconds. The development-only Vite listener at `127.0.0.1:4321` is not the production listen contract. -- The emitted server is not standalone. Running a copied `dist/` directory without the production dependency graph failed on the external `@flue/runtime` import. A runtime image must retain the focused production Node dependencies and built workspace packages, not copy `dist/` alone. -- `apps/brunch-agent/package.json` has `build` but no `start` or `build:docker` task. There is no `apps/brunch-agent/docker/Dockerfile`, Compose service, deploy-workflow catalog entry, ECS registration, or `/health` route. -- The root `.dockerignore` excludes general Markdown. Brunch's production graph imports `packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md?raw` and the SDCPN `SKILL.md` plus its sibling resources. A repository-root Docker build will omit required production inputs unless narrow exceptions admit the core system prompt and `packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/*.md`. The existing Petrinaut user-guide Markdown exception does not cover these files. -- `src/db.ts` configures Flue's canonical conversation store with Node SQLite. `BRUNCH_DEV_DB_PATH` can move the file; absent an override it writes under the application package's `.data-wipe-me/` directory. The adapter starts in WAL mode and provisions/verifies Flue tables at boot. -- Brunch's capture machinery is a second persistence concern: `applyCaptureSweep` uses `createLocalCaptureStore` to write one JSON document per Flue instance beside the conversation database. The current runbook/workpiece production path does not invoke that capture pipe, so migrating it merely because the interface exists may be speculative; any remote path that does invoke it must not leave those files ephemeral. -- The model provider is statically restricted to Anthropic in `flue.config.ts`. Normal turns require `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY`; `BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL` defaults to `claude-haiku-4-5`. The direct provider normally calls `api.anthropic.com` over HTTPS unless its standard base URL is deliberately overridden. -- `app.ts` registers `createOpenTelemetryInstrumentation({ content: false })`, but no Node OTel SDK/exporter currently sends spans to HASH's collector. Instrumentation registration is not operational telemetry. -- The browser-facing AI SDK door is `GET | POST | OPTIONS /api/chat`. It accepts `x-brunch-principal`, the conversation id, and AI SDK message bodies, and emits an AI SDK UI-message stream. Internal history reads and dispatch use in-process `app.fetch`; the Petrinaut `/api/chat` path does not need a public network hop to the mounted Flue route. -- The mounted `/agents/chat/:id` route requires `x-brunch-principal` and `x-brunch-conversation` and checks that they derive the path instance id. This is ownership consistency, not authentication: the browser currently mints the principal UUID in localStorage, and a caller can self-assert one. The bundled debug UI at `/` uses the fixed principal `local` and can start billable model turns if exposed. -- `BRUNCH_PETRINAUT_ORIGINS` is an exact comma-separated CORS allowlist. Its defaults admit only the local Petrinaut ports. CORS does not authenticate non-browser callers or prevent direct abuse. -- `apps/petrinaut-website` currently owns its production `/api/chat` with the stock modeller. Only the Brunch local Vite configuration removes that handler and proxies the route to Brunch. A remote service URL alone does not connect the production panel, and replacing that route wholesale would violate the locked second-assistant decision. -- HASH's deploy workflow treats its embedded service catalog as the build/publication/redeployment registry. Package-based change detection looks for `build:docker`, builds repository-root Dockerfiles on native arm64 and amd64 runners, publishes arm64 ECR images and multi-arch GHCR manifests, and then calls `aws ecs update-service --force-new-deployment` for already-created services. It does not create ECR, ECS, IAM, networking, DNS, secrets, databases, target groups, or backups. - -## Service and communication contract +Keep these epistemic levels separate: ```text -Petrinaut browser - → selected same-origin proxy or explicitly allowed Brunch origin - → Brunch POST/GET /api/chat (long-lived streamed response) - → in-process Flue ChatAgent route and conversation coordinator - → Anthropic HTTPS API - → response stream back to Petrinaut - -Brunch process - → durable Flue conversation/submission store - → Brunch capture store only on paths that actually invoke capture - → OTel collector after an exporter is wired +what conversation evidence supports +what target-formalism guidance suggests might be present +what projection actually represents ``` -| Boundary | Direction | Current requirement | Confidence and flexibility | -| --- | --- | --- | --- | -| Petrinaut panel | Browser → Brunch | `GET`, `POST`, and `OPTIONS /api/chat`; streamed AI SDK response; principal and conversation identity | High that this is the product door. Low on same-origin proxy versus separate origin, picker location, and exact public path. | -| Direct Flue route | Browser/diagnostics → `/agents/chat/:id` | Required by the bundled debug UI and diagnostics, but not by Petrinaut's `/api/chat` network path | High that broad public exposure is unnecessary for the panel. Whether to keep it private, authenticate it, or omit it from public ingress is a cut-time decision. | -| Anthropic | Brunch → provider HTTPS | `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY`; model selected by `BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL` | High. A provider proxy or Bedrock path would be a separate product/provider decision, not infra substitution. | -| Durable database | Brunch → storage | State must survive process and task replacement before release | High on durability; medium that Postgres is the selected mechanism because FE-1441 says so and HASH has it, but the current code has no Postgres adapter. | -| OTel collector | Brunch → telemetry backend | Remote failures, model/tool spans, duration, usage, and attributable conversation identity must be inspectable without prompt content by default | High as a release gate; medium on exact SDK/bootstrap package and environment variable names until HASH's collector convention is checked. | -| Other HASH services | — | No current call | High. Do not introduce Graph, Temporal, Redis, API, S3, Kratos, or Petrinaut Optimizer as runtime dependencies unless a concrete auth/storage/routing decision requires one. | - -## Application-owned deployment surface - -The Brunch branch should own the executable artifact and its behavioral contract, not infrastructure resource creation. - -- Add `apps/brunch-agent/docker/Dockerfile` using the repository root as context and the repository-locked Node `22.21.1`. Follow the existing Turbo-prune graph via `.github/scripts/prune-scopes.sh '@apps/brunch-agent'`, immutable Yarn install, dependency builds, and `turbo build --filter '@apps/brunch-agent' --env-mode=loose`. -- Keep only the production dependency closure and built workspace outputs in the runner where practical. Existing HASH Node images copy the whole pruned tree, while `petrinaut-opt` demonstrates a focused production runtime; either shape is acceptable if the image proves all external imports and skill resources are present. Image slimness is subordinate to a correct first container. -- Add narrow `.dockerignore` exceptions for the production Markdown inputs. Do not broadly re-admit all Brunch research, mission, evidence, or evaluation Markdown into the image. -- Run `node dist/server.mjs` through an explicit `start` script or direct exec-form container command. The stable contract is the generated `dist/server.mjs`, not the hashed server chunk or `dist/app.mjs` loader. -- Run as a dedicated non-root user, set `NODE_ENV=production`, use an init process or platform init, and create only the writable directory the selected persistence mode needs. Never require write access to the source tree. -- Add an unauthenticated, cheap liveness route such as `/health`; do not use `/`, which reads a UI asset and carries product behavior. Startup should fail before readiness when required storage migration/connection fails. The liveness response should not make a billable Anthropic call or require every external dependency to be healthy. -- Add `build:docker` so the existing affected-package machinery can see Brunch, and add a container smoke test that starts the image, observes health, exercises the built skill/resource presence, and proves the process writes only to approved writable locations. The existing build-artifact tests remain necessary but do not prove the Docker context. -- Add a deploy-workflow catalog entry only after the target image names and pre-provisioned ECS service identifiers are agreed with infra. Local Compose parity is optional unless it reveals or protects a real deployment contract; do not make Compose a ceremonial requirement. -- Document the runtime variables, secrets, ingress, egress, persistence, shutdown, and recovery contract beside the application. Do not bake secrets or environment-specific public URLs into build args or image layers. - -## Infrastructure-owned deployment surface - -Tim or the owning infrastructure repository must provide or explicitly decline each relevant resource. This checkout cannot evidence their implementation. - -- Image repository and pull permissions for the selected ECR/GHCR publication path. Current HASH convention publishes both; ECR-only is sufficient for ECS if public GHCR distribution has no consumer. -- A pre-provisioned ECS task definition and service, selected cluster, execution/task roles, runtime secret injection, security groups, private networking, outbound DNS/HTTPS to Anthropic, and database network access. Existing names under `h-stage-euc1-app` are precedent, not authority for the Brunch target. -- ALB or equivalent routing, TLS, DNS, target-group health check, idle timeout suitable for model/tool streaming, request-size controls, access logging, and the chosen public/private exposure boundary. -- Postgres database/schema/role and connection secret if Postgres remains selected, including encryption, network restriction, backup retention, point-in-time recovery expectations, and an exercised restore path appropriate to the release stakes. -- OTel collector reachability and the organization-approved service/resource attributes, retention, dashboards, and alert destinations. -- Deployment strategy and stop/drain settings compatible with Flue's one-live-owner rule and the generated server's 60-second graceful-shutdown window. -- CPU, memory, ephemeral disk, desired count, autoscaling, and cost alarms based on a measured representative conversation. No current evidence supports a numeric CPU/memory request or concurrency target. - -## Joint application/infra decisions - -These boundaries cannot be settled correctly by either side alone. - -### Restricted smoke versus public release - -A private smoke deployment may use one ECS task behind VPN, Cloudflare Access, an internal ALB, or another independently enforced boundary. It may temporarily use task-local SQLite only if restart loss is intentional, no durable user promise is made, and the environment is labelled disposable. An EFS-backed SQLite singleton is technically plausible but unproven here and should not become an accidental production architecture merely because it postpones Postgres work. - -Public exposure requires the remote-release properties below. A working image, HTTP 200, CORS allowlist, obscure conversation id, or browser-minted UUID does not discharge them. - -### Identity, authentication, and authorization +Optional SDCPN mapping hints remain advisory, may be absent or plural, identify the prose they concern, and record whether projection accepted, rejected, or deferred them. They neither establish completeness nor copy Petrinaut payloads. -Per-conversation ownership enforcement is non-negotiable; the identity source is flexible. The present code proves that a principal plus conversation id can derive and guard a Flue instance, but it trusts a caller-supplied principal. FE-1439's issue text calls the browser UUID sufficient for an accepted demo threat model and says it discharges the authentication gate, while FE-1423 and this draft's standing constraints still say no remote exposure while authentication is open. That policy conflict must be resolved explicitly before cutting or releasing this mission. +The smallest currently earned provenance seam is current workpiece revision/reference, capture evidence references, net-element ids, and projection rationale. Exact storage and identity shape remain fog for the real tracer. Stable ids must be exercised rather than assumed. Unsupported defaults, stale/partial state, identity churn, repeated projection, and visible partial failure stay explicit. -Candidate identity sources include existing HASH/Ory identity, a server-issued unforgeable anonymous session, or a restricted-preview access identity. The mission should not preselect Kratos merely because HASH uses it elsewhere. Whatever wins must establish the server-side principal, bind each conversation to it, reject cross-principal reads and writes, and preserve that binding through restart. CORS remains a browser-origin control, never the authentication mechanism. +Do not add a comprehensive process ontology, graph database, universal subject/predicate/value schema, deterministic capture-to-workpiece reducer, full regeneration engine, or typed completion algebra before observed consumer strain earns one. -### Front door and Petrinaut routing +### Foreground revision and observer re-entry -The production Petrinaut site already uses `/api/chat` for the stock assistant. Brunch must remain independently selectable and the stock assistant must remain functional when Brunch is unavailable. Same-origin path routing is attractive because it simplifies browser policy, but it creates a route-selection contract at the Petrinaut host. A separate Brunch origin avoids the path collision but requires explicit CORS, credentials/identity propagation, and another public hostname. The first public cut must name which topology it proves and how the panel selects it; infrastructure should not guess from the local proxy. +Default revision is one bounded foreground phase-boundary synthesis over the prior workpiece revision plus newly durable reviewer evidence. Reviewer authority is scenario-declared and region-bounded; recency never authorizes overwrite. Resolve correction, qualification, contextual coexistence, conflict, proposal, or refusal before canonical state changes. -Only routes needed by that topology should be reachable through public ingress. In particular, decide whether `/`, `/assets/*`, and `/agents/chat/:id` are disabled, access-controlled, or internal. The bundled debug UI's fixed `local` principal is a release blocker if the root remains public without a stronger front door. +The inferential observer is **not planned implementation**. It may re-enter only if foreground synthesis repeatedly causes consequential blocking, loses prior meaning, uses stale state, cannot recover after compaction/restart, or requires unavoidable unbounded history. Promotion would require all of the following evidence: -### Rate limits and cost controls +- two or more settled ranges fold in semantic order into coherent versioned items with valid source excerpts; +- separate `scheduledThrough` and `foldedThrough` marks prevent overlap, retries do not duplicate commits, and result-persistence retry reuses the same candidate rather than rerunning interpretation; +- revision lineage, consolidated result, and folded mark commit atomically; later reinterpretation creates a reviewed revision; +- ordinary foreground turns do not wait, and a forced tail flush makes a short review available before revision commit; +- correction, contextual qualification, and conflict preserve prior supported meaning and expose staleness/failure; +- a cold reviewer can trace every material claim to evidence or explicit inference; optional hints improve projection without biasing consolidation. -FE-1441 names per-principal and per-IP rate limits. The properties are higher confidence than the mechanism or thresholds: one caller must not exhaust provider budget; retries and reconnects must not be charged as independent abuse; legitimate long conversations must remain usable; and rejected requests must be observable without recording sensitive prompt content. Enforcement could live in WAF/ALB, an authenticated gateway, the application, or a deliberate combination. In-memory counters are not durable or replica-safe. Exact request, token, concurrency, and spend limits require representative traffic and an owner-set budget rather than invention in the infrastructure manifest. +If admitted, trigger only at a valid settled agent boundary, guard `useAgentFinish` suspensions with pending-affordance state, queue ranges in semantic order, and block canonical revision/projection when retries exhaust. The observer edits evidence-backed workpiece meaning; it never mutates the net. It must not require a second event log, full target ontology, mandatory hint slots, or foreground consultation of every fold. A threshold near 10,000 unscheduled tokens and later regroup cadence are precedents, not locked values. -### Streaming and availability +Mission 7's likely observer barrier, if that mechanism is ever admitted, is a forced tail sweep and queue flush after the 3–5 reviewer turns; the approximate token threshold alone may never fire during a short review. -Flue's Node target is a long-running service with an in-process coordinator and long-lived conversation reads; do not deploy it as Lambda, a short-lived function, or scale-to-zero. The server itself sets no request timeout. The proxy idle timeout must tolerate the longest expected silent model/tool interval or the client reconnection protocol must be proven across that timeout. The current Petrinaut Vercel function permits five minutes, which is useful precedent but not an earned ALB value. +The extraction ladder remains: model-free stub envelopes (proved) → separate cheap quote/opaque extraction or inferential consolidation (unproved) → closed typed claims/plugin catalogs (the Condition 5 failure shape). Advance only when the current consumer proves the thinner rung insufficient. Micro-cognitive subagents for decision/decomposition remain undecided and are neither an observer scheduler nor a general multi-agent architecture. -One replica is the least honest first deployment. Shared Postgres enables replacement recovery but does not by itself permit active-active handling of the same conversation. Before desired count exceeds one, prove how requests for one instance reach one live owner. Before a rolling singleton deployment is called durable, prove the overlap/drain behavior: ECS may start a replacement while the old task still owns work, while stopping old-first trades ownership safety for downtime. Deployment percentages, sticky routing, leases, and reconnect behavior remain design fog until exercised. +### Product and host boundary -## Persistence, migration, and recovery contract +The production door is Petrinaut panel → AI SDK `useChat`/`onToolCall` transport → long-running Flue `ChatAgent` → Anthropic, with client tools executed through the existing host route. Brunch is a selectable second assistant; stock remains functional when Brunch is absent or unselected. Never splice histories, steal the stock `/api/chat` contract, rewrite the panel onto `@flue/react`, or add a direct canvas/server bypass. -FE-1441 records Postgres as the intended HASH deployment store, but current implementation and current product usage make the exact application scope less certain than the infrastructure requirement suggests. +Core owns universal, context/domain/editor/formalism-independent elicitation semantics. Plugins pair one reusable domain typology with one target formalism and own that pairing's recognition/operations/coverage/verification guidance, never concrete scenario nouns. The app is the directive-marked registration and host-composition shell. Flue owns `useInstruction`, `useSkill`, `useTool`, static resource packaging, and runtime lifecycle; binding packages adapt generalized capture mechanics to a substrate. -- Flue canonical conversations, accepted submissions, and persisted state are active production data. Their store must survive process restart and ECS task replacement. The selected Flue Postgres adapter should provision/version its own tables at startup and refuse incompatible formats rather than continue ambiguously. -- Brunch capture documents are application data behind `CaptureStore`, not Flue records. If the deployed path invokes capture, a Postgres-backed implementation or another explicitly durable implementation must preserve owner-key refusal, atomic command semantics, format validation, and session-log/capture consistency. If the deployed Mission 8 path still never invokes capture, do not build a speculative Postgres capture subsystem merely to satisfy an old topology sketch; record that capture is inactive and make enabling it conditional on durable storage. -- A restart proof must distinguish process restart on one task, task replacement on another host, interrupted accepted work, reconnecting stream, and database restoration. Passing only the first is not “restart durability” on ECS. -- Schema/version policy must say which changes migrate, which refuse startup, who runs or authorizes migration, and how rollback behaves when old and new tasks overlap. Flue's internal format migration does not settle Brunch capture schema policy. -- Backup policy must identify the backed-up state, retention, encryption, access, restore owner, recovery-point objective, and recovery-time expectation at the level the deployment owner actually accepts. “RDS has backups” without a restore expectation is not evidence. -- Conversation content contains expert operational knowledge and is sent to Anthropic, stored in the database, and potentially represented in logs/traces/backups. Retention, deletion, access, provider/data-region policy, and incident handling are owner decisions that constrain infra. OTel content remains off by default until an explicit privacy policy permits otherwise. +Prompting and recognition remain Brunch-owned. The latest `petrinautAiPrompt` is coverage evidence, not text to copy; FE-1516's one-day prose drift remains the counterexample to hand-copying Petrinaut contracts. Assertion mechanics, if ever earned, are harness-owned, while SDCPN mapping hints are target-formalism policy and must not leak concepts such as `resource`, `shift`, or `place` into generic capture/revision machinery. Universal ↔ SDCPN provenance migration remains an editorial practice recorded per edit; Mission 3 exercised it zero times on new real evidence. -## Runtime configuration candidates +HASH Graph, Temporal, Redis, HASH API, S3, Kratos, and Petrinaut Optimizer are not current Brunch runtime dependencies and must not be added for symmetry. `@flue/react` remains appropriate for Brunch's local debug UI, and `binding-flue` remains a package even if it is the sole binding. The current host switch is still `yarn dev` versus `yarn dev:brunch`; that fact does not settle the product picker. -| Name | Role | Secret? | Current status and flexibility | -| --- | --- | --- | --- | -| `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY` | Authenticates model calls | Yes | Required for useful turns; inject at runtime from the approved secret store, never as a build arg. | -| `PORT` | HTTP listen port | No | Supported now; defaults to `3000`. Infra may select another port if task, target group, health check, and docs agree. | -| `NODE_ENV` | Production runtime behavior | No | Set to `production`. | -| `BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL` | Anthropic model id | No | Optional; default `claude-haiku-4-5`. Release should pin an accepted model deliberately rather than inherit a default unnoticed. | -| `BRUNCH_PETRINAUT_ORIGINS` | Exact browser CORS allowlist | No | Required for a direct or Origin-bearing browser call. Values depend on the chosen preview/public host topology. No wildcard. | -| `BRUNCH_TRANSPORT_AISDK_INSPECT` | Structured transport diagnostics to stdout | No | Optional and off by default. Decide whether emitted metadata is appropriate for production logs before enabling. | -| `BRUNCH_DEV_DB_PATH` | Current SQLite file path | No | Useful only for local/private singleton storage. The development-named variable should not become a permanent public persistence contract by accident. | -| `BRUNCH_CHAT_DB_PATH` | Hermetic test database override | No | Test-only in the current design; do not configure in production. | -| Postgres connection variable | Flue and possibly capture-store database connection | Yes | Not implemented. `DATABASE_URL` is Flue documentation precedent, not a current Brunch input; settle naming with the chosen adapter and HASH secret convention. | -| OTel endpoint/resource variables | Export telemetry to HASH collector | Usually no, possibly authenticated | Not implemented. Verify whether HASH expects standard `OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_*`, existing `HASH_OTLP_ENDPOINT`, or an application bootstrap; do not set variables that no SDK reads. | -| Authentication configuration | Establish trusted server-side principal | Likely partly secret | Unsettled. Depends on Ory, gateway, anonymous session, or restricted-preview decision. | +Mission 4 selected one mounted plugin job skill with core-authored universal elicitation packaged as a lazy resource. Frozen v3 showed independent core-skill activation at 0/3 versus packaged disclosure at 2/3 on the opening case, while both candidates correctly restrained universal disclosure on construct-only/resolvable-review cases. The sole revised review pair bypassed the shared job skill in both candidates, so the protocol verdict remained invalid/both weak rather than validating packaged B across jobs. Keep packaged B because A showed repeated topology-specific strain; do not run v4 by momentum. Independent skill identity re-enters only if a second real plugin or changed framework/model behavior proves reliable cross-skill activation or material duplication/context strain. Evidence remains in [`flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/comparison.md`](docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/comparison.md). -## Operational visibility and health +### Mission 8 consumed deployment contract -Remote release must make failures and cost attributable without turning user conversations into ambient logs. +Mission 8 on `ln/fe-1569-brunch-agent-deployment` stopped at the explicit application-to-infrastructure handoff. The application artifact is locally verified but **no remote deploy or acceptance happened**. No confirmed Brunch ECR repository, ECS service/task family, RDS database/user/IAM grant, hosted collector, restricted ingress, deployment owner, AWS credentialed run, real IAM probe, restricted Anthropic turn, cross-host replacement recovery, remote telemetry inspection, rollback, or owner acceptance exists. -- Wire a real Node OTel SDK/exporter or the approved HASH bootstrap around the existing Flue instrumentation, and verify one model turn, tool call, settlement failure, duration, token usage, and cost reach the collector with stable service, deployment, model, submission, and conversation correlation. `gen_ai.conversation.id` should equal the Flue instance id unless an accepted telemetry convention says otherwise. -- Keep `content: false` initially. Verify prompts, responses, tool arguments/results, provider keys, database URLs, and raw authorization material do not appear in traces, logs, health responses, or deployment metadata. Any later content capture needs a retention/access/redaction decision. -- Decide whether incoming `traceparent` should cross `/api/chat`; current dispatch does not propagate it. This is useful for Petrinaut-to-Brunch correlation but is not permission to delay a basic remote-failure floor. -- Emit and alert on process startup failure, database migration/connect failure, failed submission settlement, provider authentication/rate-limit/error outcomes, abnormal stream termination, task restart loops, latency, token/cost budget, database capacity, and absence of expected traffic where appropriate. Exact dashboards and thresholds remain infra/product decisions. -- `/health` should prove process liveness cheaply. Readiness may be represented by successful startup because Flue connects/migrates storage before listening, or by a separate endpoint if HASH orchestration requires it. Do not make health depend on a paid provider request. Document what the chosen probe does and does not establish. - -## CI, publication, and deployment wiring +FE-1441 remains the deployment/Postgres/rate-limit tracker, while FE-1423 retains the authentication, telemetry, state-versioning/backup, and restart-durability gates. FE-1439's browser-minted UUID demo posture does not discharge FE-1423: caller UUID, CORS, obscurity, and rate limiting are not authentication. Resolve that policy conflict before any restricted-to-public cut. -The repository-side path should converge with the existing workflow rather than create a second image pipeline. +Landed application contract, retained for successor consumers: -1. Add `start` and `build:docker` tasks to `@apps/brunch-agent` so local use and affected-package detection name the production contract. -2. Add the root-context Dockerfile and narrow `.dockerignore` exceptions. -3. Build and smoke-test the image on the architectures the workflow will publish. A local host build alone does not establish arm64 runtime correctness. -4. Add the deploy service-catalog entry with `package: "@apps/brunch-agent"`, `service: "brunch-agent"`, root context, Dockerfile path, selected registries, and only the ECS service identifiers that infra has actually provisioned. -5. Record the external infrastructure location and identifiers: account/region, cluster/service/task family, image repository, hostname/path, target group/health path, database/schema/role, secret references, collector, backup policy, and deployment owner. Do not put secret values in the repository. -6. Exercise an immutable image build, restricted deployment, health transition, one representative streamed conversation, process restart, task replacement, failed provider call visibility, and rollback behavior at the selected threshold before widening exposure. - -A local Compose entry is useful only if it exercises the same image/configuration and catches a real gap. Updating the obsolete-looking `load-docker-images` action is unnecessary unless a current consumer is found; no current workflow references it. - -## Confidence map +- immutable Node `22.21.1` non-root image runs `node dist/server.mjs`, carries focused dependencies, client assets, core prompt, and SDCPN resources, and builds on arm64 and amd64; +- `GET /health` is cheap and non-billable; required Postgres configuration and migration/connect failures fail closed before listening; +- active Flue conversation/submission/recovery/settlement state uses `@flue/postgres` with dedicated fields, verified TLS, RDS-IAM async fresh-token support and runtime-password fallback; URI-only and silent SQLite production fallback are rejected; +- OTLP/gRPC is initialized before content-free Flue instrumentation and flushed on shutdown; local disposable collector receipt is proved; +- local Docker/Postgres/collector smoke proved non-root execution, packaged resources, no `/repo` writes, TLS Postgres startup/refusal, and bounded graceful shutdown; +- public ingress denies `/`, `/assets/*`, and `/agents/chat/:id`; restricted product traffic uses `/api/chat`; one-live-owner policy remains desired-count one, stop-before-start until overlap safety is proved; +- separate Brunch capture JSON is inactive and non-durable. Do not migrate it speculatively, but any mission that consumes capture must first give it durable owner refusal, atomicity, format validation, and session/capture consistency. -### High confidence — observed or owner/issue-settled +Flue's Node target is a long-running service with an in-process coordinator and long-lived streams. Do not deploy it as Lambda, a short-lived function, or scale-to-zero. Shared Postgres does not establish active-active safety; keep one replica until ownership and routing through replacement overlap are proved. -- Brunch is a long-running Flue Node service, not a serverless function, and `dist/server.mjs` is the generated production entry. -- The runtime image requires production Node dependencies and built workspace outputs in addition to `dist/`. -- The Docker build needs repository-root context and explicit admission of production Markdown prompt/skill files. -- The current product door is Petrinaut's AI SDK `/api/chat`, with long-lived streamed responses. -- Anthropic is the only current model-provider dependency; no current Graph, Temporal, Redis, HASH API, S3, or optimizer dependency exists. -- The current SQLite/JSON state is not sufficient for ordinary replaceable ECS tasks without a separately accepted persistent-filesystem singleton design. -- Public exposure is forbidden until conversation authorization, remote telemetry, state versioning/backup, and restart durability hold. The public debug root cannot safely retain its fixed `local` identity without another access boundary. -- The stock Petrinaut assistant must remain available and its conversation history must not be spliced with Brunch history. -- The existing deploy workflow can build/publish/redeploy Brunch only after both repository catalog wiring and external ECS provisioning exist. +Still-open infrastructure/release gate: -### Medium confidence — plausible first mechanisms, not yet proved +- infra must approve/provision image repository, account/region, ECS cluster/service/task/execution roles, RDS endpoint/database/user/schema/CA and IAM grant or secret, Anthropic secret, collector, restricted hostname/access boundary, TLS/load-balancer health/stream timeout, CPU/memory, drain/stop/deployment settings, and named deployment/acceptance owner; +- one immutable digest must pass the two-connection IAM probe (or documented password fallback), real streamed Anthropic/tool turn, in-place restart, cross-host replacement, client abort, bounded provider/database failure, content/secret inspection, graceful replacement, rollback, and remote telemetry checks; +- public release additionally requires trusted identity/authorization, stock-safe Petrinaut routing and mode choice, route exposure policy, principal/IP rate and spend controls, retention/deletion/provider policy, backup/restore objectives, dashboards/alerts, and later capacity or multi-replica ownership evidence. -- Postgres is the best production store because FE-1441 records it, HASH already operates it, and Flue documents a Postgres adapter. The exact capture-store scope and schema remain unproved. -- One ECS task behind an ALB, with Postgres and no autoscaling, is the least mechanism for the first durable restricted deployment. -- Same-origin proxying from Petrinaut is likely simpler than a separate browser origin, but it competes with the stock `/api/chat` route and needs the product mode-selection contract. -- Per-principal plus per-IP rate limiting is a useful abuse floor from FE-1441, but its layer, persistence, and thresholds need the selected identity and traffic model. -- A liveness-only `/health`, storage-gated startup, and content-free Flue OTel spans match existing HASH service conventions, but exact readiness and collector bootstrap need infra confirmation. -- ECR publication and the existing staging app cluster are likely deployment conventions. GHCR publication, cluster name, hostname, and production promotion are flexible until Tim confirms consumers and environment ownership. - -### Low confidence — must alter the first move or remain visible - -- Whether the target of the next branch is a private smoke deployment, an authenticated preview, or public production. These have different required gates and should not be averaged. -- Whether a browser-minted UUID remains an accepted anonymous demo identity or FE-1423 requires real authenticated identity. Issue history and current standing constraints are not fully consistent. -- Whether to migrate only active Flue conversation state first or both Flue and currently inactive Brunch capture state in one mission. -- The exact Postgres database/schema tenancy, driver, pool sizing, migration/rollback policy, backup retention, and restore objectives. -- The Petrinaut routing shape: same-origin selected path, separate hostname, backend proxy, or another mode boundary; also whether selection may change mid-net. -- Which public routes remain reachable and whether the bundled debug UI ships at all. -- The authentication authority and token/cookie propagation mechanism. -- Rate-limit, request-size, concurrent-turn, token, and spend thresholds, and whether WAF/gateway/application share enforcement. -- CPU, memory, disk, concurrency, autoscaling, availability, and cost targets. No load evidence currently supports numbers. -- ALB idle timeout, stream reconnection behavior under silent provider intervals, rolling-deployment overlap, task-drain behavior, and multi-replica conversation ownership. -- HASH's exact Node OTel bootstrap and environment vocabulary, incoming trace propagation, telemetry retention, and alert thresholds. -- Where the infrastructure source of truth lives. This checkout has no production Terraform/task definitions despite labeler references to `infra/terraform/**`. -- Data retention, deletion, residency, access, provider terms, and whether backups/traces may contain customer operational knowledge. - -## Constraints already earned - -- Do not expose Brunch remotely merely because an image starts. A restricted smoke must remain access-controlled and explicitly labelled; public release must satisfy the remote gates. -- Do not treat the caller-supplied principal, conversation hash, CORS, or an unguessable id as authentication. -- Do not replace or destabilize the stock Petrinaut assistant, splice histories, or rewrite the panel onto `@flue/react` to simplify deployment. -- Do not add Graph, Temporal, Redis, HASH API, Kratos, or another platform dependency without a selected boundary that requires it. -- Do not put provider/database/auth secrets in Docker build args, image layers, repository files, logs, or health responses. -- Do not invent a second image/redeployment pipeline while the existing service catalog can carry the package. -- Do not copy only `dist/`, omit production Markdown, run as root, require a writable source tree, or rely on a package-local ephemeral database while claiming replacement durability. -- Do not infer active-active safety from shared Postgres. Keep one live replica until ownership/routing is proved. -- Do not turn the inactive capture path into a speculative Postgres subsystem unless the deployed throughline consumes it; if it is consumed, do not leave it on local JSON. -- Keep trace content off until privacy, retention, and access policy are accepted. Operational observability must not depend on exporting prompts. -- Preserve the current Node/Flue happy path and generated server lifecycle rather than wrapping it in a custom HTTP process manager. - -## Fog-line - -Resolve these at the smallest real deployment boundary before cutting beyond them: - -- What exposure threshold is actually being requested: infra-only image handoff, private smoke, authenticated preview, or public release? -- What exact remote threat model and identity policy does the owner accept, given the conflict between the browser-UUID demo posture and the still-open authentication gate? -- Which hostname/path and Petrinaut mode-selection mechanism route to Brunch without stealing the stock `/api/chat` contract? -- Which routes must be public, internal, or absent? -- Does the selected throughline invoke Brunch capture persistence, or only Flue conversation/workpiece history? Which state must Postgres own in this mission? -- Where does the infrastructure source live, and which ECS cluster/service, image registry, database, collector, secret store, DNS zone, and backup owner has Tim selected? -- What database isolation, migration, rollback, backup, restore, retention, and deletion contract is accepted? -- What rate-limit and spend budget protects Anthropic usage, and at which enforcement layer can principal/IP identity be trusted? -- What representative streamed interaction sets CPU/memory and idle-timeout evidence, and what reconnect behavior is required when an intermediary closes a quiet stream? -- How does a rolling singleton deployment avoid simultaneous ownership or unacceptable downtime, and what would justify a second replica? -- Which OTel bootstrap and resource attributes match HASH production, and which failures/usage signals must alert before the URL widens? -- What data classification applies to expert interviews, provider transmission, database rows, backups, logs, and traces? - -## Stop or reorient - -- Stop if public DNS or unrestricted ingress is created before the identity, authorization, rate-limit, telemetry, persistence, and recovery gates are accepted and observed. -- Stop if a green Docker build is represented as a deployed or durable product path without running the real streamed conversation through the image and selected infrastructure. -- Stop if task replacement loses or forks conversation/workpiece state, accepted work, owner binding, or any capture state the deployed path claims to preserve. -- Stop if rolling deployment or horizontal scaling can give one conversation two live owners without a proven routing/lease contract. -- Stop if the frontend integration replaces the stock assistant, merges histories, or depends on Brunch being available when stock mode is selected. -- Stop if the public root or mounted Flue route permits unauthenticated billable turns, cross-owner reads/writes, or bypass of the intended gateway. -- Stop if CORS, UUID entropy, ALB obscurity, or rate limiting is presented as authentication. -- Stop if telemetry variables are configured but no exported failure/turn/tool span reaches the approved backend, or if observability exports prompt/tool content without accepted policy. -- Stop if `DATABASE_URL` or another Postgres secret is provisioned but current SQLite/JSON code still ignores it while release claims Postgres durability. -- Stop if backup is claimed without naming the backed-up state and demonstrating a restore expectation, or if schema mismatch silently proceeds. -- Stop if container slimming drops external runtime dependencies, the core prompt, skill resources, client assets, or architecture support. -- Stop if arbitrary CPU, memory, timeout, replica, retention, or rate-limit numbers harden into infrastructure without a measured or owner-accepted premise. -- Reorient to a restricted singleton smoke if public-release prerequisites cannot be settled in the mission window; preserve the real image and operational evidence without weakening the public gate. - -# Parallel and asynchronous proof tracks - -These tracks can begin before the numbered mission that may consume them. Product-changing tracks still need their own issue, branch, and mission when implementation begins. Results are evidence inputs; they do not silently rewrite another branch's authority. - -| Track | Can start from | Produces | Join gate | Does not block | -| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | -| Frozen prospective baseline | Completed Mission 3 control: one invalid runtime member and two valid graded members | Immutable artifacts plus campaign adjudication | Mission 4 consumes the observed range before freezing or claiming improvement of its candidate instrument | Mission 5's projection tracer | -| Inferential observer fold | Fixed historical transcript and expected source excerpts | Evidence-backed consolidated revisions plus latency/failure observations | Decision report before Mission 6: admit observer-derived state only if evidence preservation, ordering, latency, and flush behavior pass; otherwise select foreground phase-boundary synthesis or reorient | Missions 4–5; Mission 6 is informed by this spike but does not require it to succeed | -| Provider-visible schema path | Existing failed paid run, canonical Petrinaut Zod schemas, live client-tool route | One real-model canonical nested tool call or a crisp upstream blocker | A successful canonical call admits Mission 5 construction; a crisp upstream blocker triggers Mission 5 stop/reorientation and does not count as satisfying the join | Baseline and Mission 4 redesign | -| Provenance interaction fixture | Fixed workpiece item and a tiny versioned derivation-record fixture | Reviewer-visible “why?” interaction | Freeze the smallest fixture contract before Mission 5 projection and UI branches diverge; both must consume that exact version | Provider/model construction while fixtures are used honestly | -| Host choice/session lifecycle | Existing panel routing and localStorage net/conversation mapping | Smallest proof of Brunch selection and resume for the selected artifact | Selected artifact resumes the same Brunch history, a new net starts distinct history, and stock mode remains unaffected | One fixed-mode Mission 5 tracer | -| Optimisation handoff | Existing Petrinaut artifact/scenario formats and stakeholder conversation | Written consumer input/output contract and one accepted fixture | Required before Mission 7 declares handoff | Missions 4–6 implementation | -| Simulation-backed semantic check | Hermetic non-empty net and selected workpiece expectations | Qualitative behavior comparison | Promotes into delivery only if cheap enough and discriminating | First provenance tracer | - -The first shared interface candidates are deliberately small and provisional: +A private smoke may temporarily use task-local SQLite only when restart loss is intentional, no durable user promise is made, and the environment is explicitly disposable. An EFS-backed SQLite singleton remains unproved and must not become accidental production architecture merely to postpone Postgres. -```text -EvidenceBackedWorkpieceItem -DerivationRecord -NetPatch -``` - -Do not freeze richer names or field catalogs before two tracks need them. If fixture UI and projection code cannot agree on the minimal derivation record, that disagreement is the next design evidence and parallel work pauses at that seam. - -# Inferential observer-fold hypothesis - -Not yet a mission and not part of the current production path. It is a candidate parallel spike whose result may supply Mission 6's revision mechanism. - -The observer is the candidate semantic sweep mechanism, not a harness counter parked under that label. It is a separate model-assisted editor over settled conversation ranges, neither a deterministic reducer nor the foreground elicitor calling a sweep tool. It receives new evidence plus the previously committed consolidated understanding and may rewrite coherent assertion-sized units using inference. This intentionally front-loads some interpretation while avoiding a comprehensive semantic typology. The binding may still execute the mechanical capture-store `apply-sweep`; the foreground model must not decide when to invoke it. - -A candidate consolidated item remains semantically open prose with generic mechanics only: stable id, revision, title/body, supporting evidence spans, unresolved material, lineage/change account, and optional target-formalism mapping hints. Fields such as `resource.capacity`, `shift: day`, or universal `subject/predicate/value` are not assumed. The right assertion granularity — neither atomic fragments nor one giant process digest — is itself part of the spike. - -## Mechanical shell around inferential semantics - -- Count eligible unscheduled tokens without a model call. Arm after an observed threshold; precedent is on the order of 10,000 tokens, not a locked value. -- Trigger on the next valid settled agent boundary. In Flue, `useAgentFinish` is the known “would stop” seam and also fires on `terminate: true` suspension, so the pending-affordance guard is load-bearing. Do not bind the architecture to an unverified Pi event name. -- Keep separate `scheduledThrough` and `foldedThrough` high-water marks so a lagging queue does not schedule overlapping ranges. -- Calls are asynchronous relative to the foreground, queued in semantic order, and retried on failure. A later range cannot commit against a state that excludes an earlier required range. -- A failed provider call may be retried from the same range and base revision. If a model result exists but persistence fails, retry the stored candidate commit rather than calling the model again and obtaining a different interpretation. -- Commit the observer result, revision lineage, and folded high-water mark atomically. Once committed, reinterpretation creates a new reviewed revision; it does not silently replace the old one. -- Ordinary elicitation reads neither the pending queue nor every fold. A compact re-group may occur after a larger token interval, on resume, before phase transition, or before revision commit; the prior `every XX tokens` notation named the idea, not an earned threshold. -- Mission 6's likely barrier is a forced tail sweep and queue flush after the 3–5 reviewer turns. This is a hypothesis to prove; the threshold alone may never fire during such a short review. -- If retries exhaust, mark the queue blocked, retain later ranges, and expose staleness. Questions may continue, but canonical revision or projection must not proceed from silently stale evidence. - -## Semantic obligation - -The observer may consolidate, qualify, split, merge, or rewrite assertions through inference. The safety claim is not deterministic replay. It is that every committed revision remains auditable against the prior revision and real evidence. - -A useful oracle compares: - -```text -previous consolidated meaning + newly disclosed evidence -against -new consolidated meaning -``` +Old Mission 8 reconciliation: -It asks whether prior supported meaning survived unless explicitly changed; new evidence was incorporated; hedges and context remained; corrections affected only what they corrected; conflicts were not harmonized away; unsupported specificity was marked; and every material statement is supportable or explicitly inferential. +| Old subsection | Disposition | Surviving consequence/evidence | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Observed starting point; application-owned surface; runtime candidates; CI wiring | Superseded proposal where implemented; landed application contract where locally observed | The bullets above and deployment handoff replace the pre-implementation audit. Image slimming, Compose parity, and obsolete workflow cleanup have no surviving requirement without strain. | +| Service/communication contract | Landed locally at the application seam | Long-running `/api/chat` → Flue → Anthropic shape, Postgres state, liveness, restricted routes, and content-free OTel survive; remote crossing remains unproved. | +| Infrastructure-owned surface | Still-open infrastructure gate | Provisioning and identifiers belong to infra; a deploy-catalog entry cannot create them. | +| Restricted smoke/public release; identity; front door; rate limits; streaming/availability | Restricted-threshold proposal partly superseded by the stopped handoff; public decisions still open | No public release. Caller UUID, CORS, obscurity, or rate limiting are not authentication. Keep one replica; measure timeout/reconnect and ownership before widening. | +| Persistence, migration, recovery | Flue Postgres application contract landed; replacement/backup and capture durability still open | Process-local proof is not ECS replacement proof. Capture remains inactive and must become durable when consumed. | +| Operational visibility/health | Local application contract landed; hosted inspection still open | Local collector and liveness pass; remote normal/failure/cost correlation, privacy inspection, retention, dashboards, and alerts do not. | +| Confidence, constraints, fog, stop lines | Reduced to the landed/open gates above | Never call an image or HTTP 200 deployed/durable, never weaken TLS or leak secrets, never infer active-active safety, and stop before unrestricted exposure or false recovery claims. | -The existing elicitation-to-IR ruler and cold reviewer can seed this oracle, but they have not tested successive observer revisions. Path/order perturbation and a true correction are required before confidence rises. +Authoritative observed details are in the deployment branch's `docs/evidence/implementations/mission-8-deployment-handoff.md`. This branch imports the application contract and open gates only—not that branch's Mission 4 archive, Mission 8 live-status transition, or an implication of remote success. -## SDCPN recognition hints +## Parallel and asynchronous proof tracks -The layer of SDCPN guidance that may later become plugin policy can name entity and relationship lenses plus tips, heuristics, motifs, distinguishing questions, common traps, and candidate projection relevance. Examples include things that flow, work that changes them, reusable constrained inputs, accumulation/waiting, operating conditions, arrivals/departures, reservation/release, consumption, blocking/enabling, routing, grouping/splitting, contention, and condition-dependent rates. +These tracks may start only under their own issue, branch, PR, and mission authority when they change product code. Their results are evidence inputs and do not silently rewrite another mission. -These are attention and mapping hints, not a comprehensive domain ontology or mandatory assertion schema. An assertion revision may carry no hints or several competing hints. A hint must identify the prose it refers to and explain why; the projector records whether it accepted, rejected, or deferred it. Hints do not copy Petrinaut payload fields, establish completeness, or dictate topology. +| Track | Join gate under the accepted spine | Does not block | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Frozen prospective baseline | Mission 4 consumes the observed one-invalid/two-valid range before freezing or claiming improvement of its candidate instrument | Mission 5's prepared-pair work | +| Inferential observer fold | Decide before Mission 7 whether observed foreground strain earns promotion; otherwise retain phase-boundary synthesis | Missions 4–6 | +| Provider-visible nested schema | One successful canonical nested call admits Mission 6's construction tracer; a crisp upstream blocker stops or reorients it | Missions 4–5 | +| Provenance interaction fixture | Freeze the minimal derivation fixture before Mission 5's why UI and Mission 6 projection diverge | Provider/model work while fixtures remain explicitly prepared | +| Host choice/session lifecycle | The selected artifact resumes the same Brunch history, a new net starts distinct history, and stock mode remains independent | One fixed-mode Mission 5 tracer | +| Optimisation handoff contract | Chris/Yannis accept input/output contract and one fixture before Mission 9 is cut | Missions 4–7 | +| Simulation-backed semantic check | Promote only if cheap and discriminating for the selected revision | First provenance tracer | -Evidence consolidation and SDCPN hint annotation remain logically separate even if the first spike emits both in one model response. The observer must first preserve the operational account, then annotate possible relevance. If hints bias consolidation or can be regenerated independently, split them into a later asynchronous pass. +The deliberately provisional shared-interface names remain `EvidenceBackedWorkpieceItem`, `DerivationRecord`, and `NetPatch`. Do not freeze richer names or field catalogs before two tracks genuinely share them. If fixture UI and projection cannot agree on the minimal derivation record, pause parallel work at that seam. -## Spike evidence that would justify promotion +## Detailed provisional clusters -- Two or more settled ranges fold in order into coherent versioned items with valid evidence excerpts. -- An injected transient failure retries without duplicate commits or skipped evidence. -- A real ordinary foreground turn does not wait for observer completion and remains in the healthy teaching-turn latency class. -- A forced flush makes a short revision tail available before canonical workpiece update. -- A correction, a contextual qualification, and a conflict each preserve prior history rather than overwriting by recency. -- A cold reviewer can trace the consolidated revision to evidence and identify any unsupported inference. -- Optional SDCPN hints improve or focus projection on at least one case without degrading assertion fidelity; otherwise omit them. +Detailed mission-specific boundaries, tracer floors, readiness ratchets, risks, oracles, and stop conditions live only in these four context repositories: -## Stop or reorient +- [Draft Mission 5 — capture-backed review](docs/mission-drafts/5-capture-backed-review.md) +- [Draft Mission 6 — automatic traceable projection](docs/mission-drafts/6-traceable-projection.md) +- [Draft Mission 7 — bounded reviewer revision](docs/mission-drafts/7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md) +- [Draft Mission 9 — optimisation handoff](docs/mission-drafts/9-optimisation-handoff.md) -- Stop if the observer needs the full target ontology before it can preserve one coherent account. -- Stop if foreground questions block on observer calls or consult every intermediate fold. -- Stop if queue ordering requires a second conversation/event log beside Flue history. -- Stop if retry can duplicate or silently replace a committed interpretation. -- Stop if consolidated revisions lose prior supported meaning or launder observer prose into user evidence. -- Stop if mapping hints become required semantic slots, completion accounting, or copied Petrinaut schemas. -- Stop if the observer directly mutates the net; its first candidate role ends at evidence-backed workpiece revision. +Do not create Mission 4 or Mission 8 drafts. Mission 9 stays deliberately shallow until Chris and Yannis accept input artifacts, one optimisation question, scenario/parameter representation, execution boundary, expected result, and minimum credibility checks. -## Extraction thickness retained from the prior draft +## Unallocated backlog -Mission 2 proved the pipe with no extraction model: one envelope per user utterance, quote equal to that text, payload `{}`. That remains the floor. +### Universal elicitation teaching -Progressive re-entry remains an evidence ladder rather than a destination: +The supported core is objective-relative interviewing: establish intended questions, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, non-claims, and assumption tolerance; begin with one concrete occasion and walk it before generalizing; preserve expert statement, inference, assumption, unknown, unasked, conflict, correction, omission, and loss; treat divergence as information; spend questions by information value; stop on evidence rather than fluency, headings, fatigue, or turn count. -1. Stub envelopes — proven. -2. A separate cheap extraction call producing quotes or opaque blobs without slot types or kind mapping — the prior unadmitted rung. The current observer spike extends this rung into inferential evidence-backed consolidation and must prove that the extra judgment pays for itself. -3. Closed typed claims or plugin proposal catalogs — the prior Condition 5 failure shape; re-enter only if a present consumer proves prose-plus-hints insufficient. +Unplaced candidate moves remain: closing clearinghouse (“what important thing was not asked?”); anchored hypotheticals based on a narrated incident; the clairvoyant definitional test for quantities; contrastive/expert-versus-novice probes; full-history consistency checks; depth on load-bearing facts without a universal turn count; anti-vagueness and anti-leading guidance; explicit exception/absence sweeps; premortem phrasing; correction-versus-context discriminator; and distinct declined, deferred, user-unknown, undecided, not-applicable, explicitly absent, and not-yet-asked outcomes. -Subagents remain undecided as a product mechanism. The specific prior idea was micro-cognitive specialists for decisioning and decomposition, not a floating multi-agent architecture and not the observer scheduler itself. +Placement and dosage remain unresolved. Historical 2–4 batching guidance did not prevent 4–10-question openings because those runs asked before reading elicitation guidance, while valid prospective runs did not repeat the overload. One question versus a small shared-frame batch, posture-as-intake risk, clarification versus case-deepening, quantitative/tail scripts, closing cadence, and assent semantics need discriminating probes. Do not contaminate the frozen baseline; use a separately versioned campaign. Remove caveat/failure/restatement/typology duplication before adding another catalog, and replace “high appetite,” “several turns,” or “deepen” with observable behavior. -# Delivery-adjacent host continuity +### SDCPN investigation and construction teaching -These concerns were previously grouped as Mission 4. The FE-1476 spine now pulls only the minimum host work into the numbered mission where the real story requires it; the remainder stays here. +Preserve this operational investigation floor without turning it into an opening schema: -## Two brains, same panel +1. decision/comparison/worry, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy, non-claims; +2. one trigger-to-end occasion: flows, prerequisites, activities, order, outputs; +3. consumed versus reserved/released versus inspected inputs, capacity, simultaneous demand; +4. practiced versus written branching/contention, overrides, retries, failure, recovery, conflict; +5. objective-relevant typical/tail timing, hidden waits, calendars, arrivals, directional losses, grouping/splitting, thresholds, changing conditions; +6. attributed evidence, assumptions, unknown/unasked/conflict/correction/omission and projection limits without hardening hedges or incidents into rates; +7. trust observations and alternatives to compare; +8. a reconstructable spine from which construction can name the smallest consequential gap. -A person using the Petrinaut demo should be able to choose the stock modeller or the Brunch Flue agent without relaunching. Today the switch is `yarn dev` versus `yarn dev:brunch`. +Typology decisions are strain-gated: retain six question shapes; complete Grouped movement; strengthen Timed work before adding hidden-waiting type; split Mode-change loss into time/material/availability/what-cannot-run-next; probe condition-dependent duration/failure/loss under properties/time before adding a type; make arrivals explicit for throughput before a seventh type; do not add queue/waiting, priority/deadline, or escalation/approval types while existing resource/branch/trigger/lens guidance covers them. Numeric thresholds are required only when expert usage/objective requires one. Unclear scarce-resource release blocks construction only when alternate semantics change the objective; otherwise preserve a conspicuous assumption. -**Locked.** Brunch is a second assistant, not the new Petrinaut modeller. Panel stays `useChat` / `onToolCall`. Do not splice conversations. Stock must work with brunch-agent down. HASH embed stays stock unless opted in. Do not rewrite the panel onto `@flue/react`. +Return to elicitation on missing objective or spine, unclear capped-resource fate, policy without practiced contention, missing throughput arrival, or objective-critical tail behavior. This list is an unexercised probe, not typed completion. Preserve adversarial probes: policy/practice, shared contention, hidden waiting encoded as work, directional changeover, rare incident as rate, unknown distribution forced into a family, grouped work that can split, continuous influence without threshold; plus newcomer, borderline, same-case/different-objective, evidence-order perturbation, and true correction after apparent readiness. Classify misses as acquisition, conservation, or simulator nondisclosure. -**Fog, still unasked at the real boundary.** How both backends share an origin; where the picker lives; whether switching mid-net is legitimate or selection occurs only at start. Mission 5 may use a fixed Brunch mode; Mission 7 owns only the choice the rehearsal needs. +The six `Transform to PN` children conceptually belong to construction, but two historical runs showed no vocabulary leak. Move them only in an instrumented teaching variant. Construction opens representational losses and returns only the smallest consequential gap; it does not silently fill one. -## Net create/save/load as session lifecycle +### Workpiece hypotheses and cold-reading obligations -**Working assumption.** Petrinaut net id discriminates one Flue conversation per principal. Prove only when the review/resume path needs it: save/load keeps the same conversation; a new net id mints a new one. If net ids regenerate or collide, drop the assumption and rekey. +Observed strain: Mission 3 workpieces were composed wholesale late; six epistemic marks did not prevent agent values reading as testimony or unasked material reading as user unknown; Situation notes duplicated sections; Projection losses mixed elicitation gaps, construction choices, and actual representational loss; assumptions omitted reason/check; unsettled marks had no authority; declined/not-applicable were unexercised; flat prose obscured contextual/directional quantities. -**Facts.** Conversation ids today are a localStorage map keyed by `netId`. New session means mint another conversation id; resume means reload the same net. Archived Mission 2 keys capture by Flue conversation identity (principal + conversation id) until this proof lands. +Competing shapes remain: -**Locked.** Net id is only the conversation discriminator. A distinct Brunch target-document stays later. Do not collapse “one net is the target-document”; that is an unearned product ontology and would leak into HASH entity versus demo localStorage. Two alternatives remain rejected: collapsing the net into the target-document, and sweeping into a throwaway store to splice later. +- **A, case/process spine + epistemic ledger:** one concrete flow; one light authoritative home for unresolved meaning, assumptions, conflicts, next questions. +- **B, entity/resource register:** stronger repeated per-entity/product/direction/quantity retrieval at greater semantic-organization cost. +- **C, current headings split by authorship/phase:** lowest-change control separating expert-given, agent-assumed with reason/check, construction-decided, elicitation gap, construction-opened loss. +- **D, append-only journal:** rejected unless a real correction lifecycle outweighs its cold-reading burden. +- **Objective slices/cases/residue:** alternate emphasis around model questions, evidence, blockers, validation, and next questions. +- **Versioned assertion clusters:** coherent evidence-backed prose with lineage and optional hints; granularity/stability remain low confidence, not default ontology. -## Compaction +A transcript-blind reader must state objective; reconstruct order; separate evidence/inference/assumption/unknown/conflict; name contradictions and next questions; judge construction readiness without inventing a spine; and spot-check epistemic standing and typical/tail context. Preserve objective, boundary/horizon, cases, policy/practice, contextual quantities, contention, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, validation, and named losses. Move PN transformation knowledge to construction, repair phase-mixed gap/loss and formulaic closure, and delete duplicate summaries only after one authority is proved. -Prove the panel and transcript reconstruct across a real Flue compaction boundary (`compaction-vs-durable-history` / FE-1386) before claiming durable long-running provenance. Compaction is Flue-default and unpinned. Product control to compact or show a summarized range waits for that pin. +Rejected mechanisms re-enter only under their named strain: closed kinds/slots/demand rows/precision ladders if projection repeatedly cannot find consequential prose meaning; typed completion if evidence checks repeatedly permit unsupported readiness or cannot name the next question; per-statement epistemic enums if targeted prose/revision checks still launder authorship; typed per-capture losses if explicit construction loss cannot audit decisions; `firesWhen`, motif/repertoire/plugin runtime, one-artifact merger, and capture-envelope typed fold only for a real second consumer or observed failure. -The current runbook recovers its workpiece by scraping the last `runbook-ir` fence from Flue history. A compaction boundary that summarizes the fence away breaks that pattern. FE-1476 may avoid crossing a compaction boundary during the short rehearsal, but the exported provenance package must say whether it depends on live uncompacted history. +The previous typed-map cluster—required fields and unresolved gaps mechanically deriving ask/construct/deliver—remains a recorded hypothesis, not the default. It re-enters only if the workpiece-to-projection tracer or construction-gap return shows that model-assisted judgment cannot reliably name the smallest next question without typed demands. -Compaction is history reconstruction, not prompting. Do not use it to sequence the first traceable projection unless the real rehearsal crosses it. +### Capture/workpiece seam history and rejected mechanisms -## Voice +Four prior relationships retain distinct evidence: -Voice is a git parent and integration constraint, not a delivery mission here. Stack on `kostandin/h-6763-openai-canonical-speech` when that branch is the parent. Use the same `POST /api/chat` dock Mission 1 named. Resolve UUID-per-net versus `petrinaut-preview:${netId}`, stolen versus configured `/api/chat`, and `submitText` with no `brunch_ask`. Brunch owns no provider audio. +- **A, production independence:** lowest Condition 5 exposure and still useful outside delivery, but insufficient for FE-1476 provenance. High fan-in/context dependence supports keeping source ledger and synthesis separate. +- **B, support links only:** nearest current hypothesis. Offline links need evaluation-local ids; durable links require workpiece identity stable through revision. +- **C, capture fold proposes updates:** requires semantic interpretation/order/authority and remains unproved; the observer is only an asynchronous variant question. +- **D, one artifact:** refused because immutable evidence and editable synthesis have different lifecycles and it recreates the latency/complexity failure shape. -# Later / opportunistic tracks +The optional offline shadow join runs Mission 2 capture over settled history, assigns temporary workpiece-statement ids, and grades evidence relation, epistemic treatment, lifecycle relation, and projection treatment separately; assumptions never count as evidence support. Measure support coverage, synthesis fan-in, capture utility, context dependence, correction integrity, path sensitivity, and revision link churn. A fold becomes plausible only if order perturbation preserves active meaning without loop latency or requiring elicitor consultation of every fold. FE-1476 supersedes independence only as a sufficient delivery posture; it proves no store fold, merger, live linker, or comprehensive identity system. -These are not sequenced on the FE-1476 critical path. They may ride a live mission only when its real throughline already exposes the hook. +### Mission 3 split and construction evidence -## Observability / eval / tracing +The surviving outcome is intentionally split: **runbook/workpiece path accepted; real-model semantic construction false on the exercised route**. Mission 3 locked one off-canvas PN JSON result, Petrinaut validation, manual load as inspection, and no canvas tools. The frozen prospective control has one invalid runtime member and two valid independently graded workpieces; historical runs are calibration only. -Node OTel SDK → HASH collector / Tempo. Flue `instrument(...)` already exists in `app.ts`, but nothing exports. Prove `gen_ai.conversation.id` equals the Flue instance id. `dispatch()` on `/api/chat` does not propagate `traceparent`. Content capture stays off until a privacy policy. FE-1505 / FE-1423 remain production gates. +Validated construction proved packaging, canonical callback validation, and a hermetic non-empty fixture using exactly `getLatestNetDefinition`, `addType`, `addParameter`, `addPlace`, `addTransition`, and `addArc` through immutable Flue `initialData`; those tools stayed absent from ordinary conversations. One paid run failed provider-visible nested shape: all nine `addType.elements` arrays arrived as strings, yielding a parser-valid but semantically vacuous empty net. One-shot construction took 162–271 seconds versus 5–23-second teaching turns. Construction-gap return was not exercised; the agent emitted `partial-with-named-gaps`. Periodic generation, programmatic load, and validated patch remain successors, never retroactive success. -Do not make broad OTel a proof bullet of Mission 5. Capture only the latency and tool evidence needed by the tracer; remote release remains separately gated. +Do not rewrite Mission 3 as if all proof items passed. Its falsified provider-visible nested-schema route is Mission 6's first risk-retiring tracer, not Mission 5 closure and not retroactive Mission 3 success. -## Watch simulated conversations +### Gherkin pressure test -Parallel spike, not a mission. The product itch is that simulated conversations are not visually observable. Driver remains `@flue/sdk` JSON (`createFlueClient` → `send` → `wait` → `history()`), not PTY polling. Human observer is the same conversation URL. `:4321` already follows a conversation through `useFlueAgent` but only paints text; rendering `dynamic-tool`, `data-*`, and skill activation would make it useful. +Selected paper hypothesis: **software behavior × Gherkin, Shape C**—a lightweight near-target behavior workpiece plus combined Gherkin authoring/checking. The workpiece holds purpose, rules, concrete context/event-or-action/outcome examples, terms, status, authorship, and open matters without mandatory Given/When/Then decomposition; target text can become a correction surface. Core owns universal epistemic conduct; plugin owns software behavior/Gherkin additions across Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, Verification; grammar semantics come from authoritative Gherkin capability. -The missing capability is a second observer on the same conversation URL, not a new protocol. Herdr panes are PTYs, not browsers. Do not wait for a Herdr webview or couple every simulation to Petrinaut panel client tools. +The paper design lives under `packages/core/_drafts/ampcode`. Local `packages/plugin-gherkin/plugin.yaml` is content-territory evidence from inactive generalized YAML machinery, not a Flue/parser/binding route. A read-only Oracle review independently selected Shape C; that agreement is design advice, not runtime evidence. -## Simulation-backed construct check +Rejected **A** (mirror SDCPN's separate construction topology) overfits a distant/tool-mediated shape to near textual projection. Rejected **B** (`.feature` as workpiece and target) cannot honestly carry unsupported rules, authorship, current/proposed status, conflict, deferral, and unchecked binding without a hidden comments sidecar. Shape C reverses toward a less target-shaped workpiece if authorship laundering repeats, toward target text plus minimal open matters if transcription repeatedly has zero epistemic delta, or toward a separate checking phase if a real codebase step-binding capability earns it. -Nothing yet proves that a non-empty parser-valid net behaves like the workpiece. Candidate oracle: Petrinaut's simulation engine runs the net against qualitative expectations retained with the selected objective and compares behavior. The hermetic side-quest net is a fixture; the empty paid run is not. +Evidence ladder remains authored text → parser-valid text → step-definition-bound text → runtime-executed behavior → behavioral adequacy; claim only checks actually run. No Flue plugin route, parser, step corpus, binding index, or execution path exists. First tracer: smallest real software-behavior/Gherkin path through Flue, resource-read observation, provenance preservation, and explicit separation of authored/parser/binding/execution evidence. Early drafting may improve correction or anchor users to agent wording; only a run decides. -This can run as a parallel feasibility track. Promote it into FE-1476 acceptance only if it gives a cheap discriminating check for the selected revision. Otherwise retain non-empty semantic inspection and make the limitation explicit at handoff. +### Dafny pressure test -## AI SDK 7 `HarnessAgent` +Candidate pairing is **software correctness obligations × Dafny specification modules/program contracts**. “Formal-verification use cases” is too target-neutral for a plugin; “verified state evolution × kernel contracts” overfits one repository. Supplied kernels are project context, not plugin ontology: `Model`/`Action`/`Inv`/`Valid`/`Apply`, `TryStep`, `Rebase`, `Candidates`, and `Explains` are recognition examples, never required decomposition. -Undecided. It is the converse of the current door—resume a harness session by chat id. Flue already owns that session; `transport-aisdk` is the UI adapter. A Pi / Claude Code harness would be another substrate, which `binding-flue` isolates, or a Flue replacement. It is not the watch-sims surface and not part of FE-1476 without new evidence. +The source prompt is [“From Intent to Proof: Dafny Verification for Web Apps”](http://midspiral.com/blog/from-intent-to-proof-dafny-verification-for-web-apps/). The Ampcode paper prototype records the pairing in its `core/SYSTEM.md` and `README.md` without Dafny plugin resources or production wiring. A read-only Oracle review selected this pairing over state-evolution and target-neutral alternatives; that remains design advice. -# Closed runbook/workpiece mission record and carried inputs +Recognition spans initialization/representation invariants; pre/post/frame conditions; preservation, rejection, unchanged-on-failure; history/trace/round-trip/determinism/idempotence; abstraction/refinement/simulation/normalization/intent preservation; termination/progress; and trusted boundaries. It is an open repertoire. A nonnegative invariant can miss stale-redo while history laws catch it; initialization plus preservation proves only the expressed invariant for reachable states. -Mission 3 locked one off-canvas PN JSON result, Petrinaut validation, manual load as sufficient inspection, and no canvas tools. It closed with the runbook/workpiece path accepted and real-model semantic construction false on the exercised route. +Keep three claim ladders explicit: intent ≠ formalization ≠ proof; stated ≠ assumed/axiomatized ≠ discharged ≠ trusted; verified source ≠ compiled artifact ≠ integrated system. Preconditions, admissibility predicates, abstraction functions, and candidate relations can make proof vacuous: ask what states/inputs are excluded, seek a witness and nearby counterexample, and expose every weakening/strengthening/normalization/reinterpretation. Proof search never silently edits authoritative intent to get green. -- The runbook skill packages and discloses universal elicitation, the Markdown workpiece, PN construction, and checks through the production Flue agent. -- Two historical real runs remain calibration only. The frozen prospective campaign contains one invalid runtime member and two valid independently graded workpieces; its authoritative range and dispositions are in `docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md`. -- Opening overload of 4–10 numbered questions appeared in both historical runs but did not recur in either valid prospective member. The system/resource placement question remains unresolved; do not turn either observation into a universal rule. -- One-shot construction ran 162–271 seconds, a distinct budget from healthy 5–23 second teaching turns. -- The validated construction side quest proved packaging, canonical callback validation, and a hermetic non-empty net. Its construct-only agent mounted exactly `getLatestNetDefinition`, `addType`, `addParameter`, `addPlace`, `addTransition`, and `addArc` through immutable Flue `initialData`; those tools remained absent from ordinary panel conversations. The one paid real-model run failed because provider-visible schemas erased nested shape: nine `addType.elements` calls encoded the array as a string. Parser acceptance of the resulting empty document was vacuous. -- Construction-discovered-gap return was unexercised. The agent delivered `partial-with-named-gaps` rather than asking the smallest next question. -- Periodic PN generation, programmatic loading, and a validated live patch remain successor concerns; they are not retroactive Mission 3 success. -- The six `Transform to PN` children still reside under elicitation despite construction owning that knowledge. Move them only in a teaching variant or mission that can observe the effect. +Minimum target is a Dafny specification module—types/abstract types, predicates, signatures, relevant `requires`/`ensures`/`reads`/`modifies`/`decreases`, named lemmas—plus an obligation manifest mapping human claims to declarations, formalization choices, evidence status, and trusted dependencies. Missing bodies and `assume`/`{:axiom}` remain stated/trusted, not proved. The workpiece retains purpose/economics, harm, natural-language intent, witnesses/counterexamples/boundaries, state/operations/history, kernel context, assumptions/environment, authored formalization and deltas, tool status, and unverified integration perimeter; “not suited/worthwhile for Dafny” is a valid outcome. -The close decision is “runbook/workpiece path accepted; real-model semantic construction false.” Do not rewrite Mission 3 as if all original proof items passed. Its falsified construction route is now Mission 5's first boundary. +A separate authoring and proof-evidence resource is plausible but unearned. Reverse to narrower state-evolution only if independent projects converge on it; add target selection above activation if Dafny-shaped recognition repeatedly anchors users away from a better method. First proof is one existing-codebase claim, exact contract, exact verifier run, and human judgment that intent/formalization/proof stayed legible. Fog: anchoring, smallest useful abstract module/manifest, accessible semantic diff, and keeping triage additive rather than generic consulting. -# Gherkin second-reference pressure test — paper design, not a mission +### Structured-question vertical capability -The Ampcode prompt-architecture draft has now been tested against the intended second reference pairing: **software behavior as the reusable domain typology and Gherkin documents as the target formalism**. This is a non-authoritative paper design under `packages/core/_drafts/ampcode`; it does not promote Gherkin into the production app composition or change the current SDCPN-only route. +Structured questions remain an optional future capability, not permission to restore Condition 5's foreground `brunch_ask` or retired generalized runtime. Conversation is primary; a question is a rendered affordance committed as session evidence, not an exchange-pair ontology. Preserve free-text, single-choice, multi-choice, questionnaire chaining, and a markdown floor; custom forms remain progressive, opaque at the tool boundary, and harness-validated on read-back. -The local `packages/plugin-gherkin/plugin.yaml` is evidence of the intended content territory—feature, rule, example, step, software-behavior guidance, and proposal language—but not of a working prompt/skill architecture. It remains attached to the inactive generalized YAML machinery, its TypeScript package exports only a verbatim proposal, and no Flue skill, Gherkin parser, step-definition index, binding check, or execution path is currently wired. The historical worked IR examples are the stronger guide at one disputed boundary: behavior is recorded in the person's language and target projection may factor one case into steps; elicitation must not require a mandatory step-kind decomposition merely because Gherkin is the destination. +The real proof must cross **model → binding → transport → frontend → correlated reply → resumed model turn**. One assistant message may have one live interactive affordance because the data channel is last-write-wins; durable identity/payload ride the ask tool output, and mechanism rejects a second ask in the batch. A terminating tool suspends; pending affordance is durable per-session state and is narrated in the tool result, never interpolated into instructions. The harness mechanically binds the next reply while pending—no model-memory id or echo token—then resumes a fresh dispatch; interpretation later cites reply text. Outbound may be rich, inbound is string-only; unknown parts can disappear, so markdown fallback is mandatory. Preserve answered/redirected/unanswered as transport outcomes distinct from epistemic absence, and filter diagnostic signals by message purpose/display. -The generalization survives at the level of responsibilities: +Do not claim this from a model tool call or rendered widget alone. Exercise all layers, cancellation/topic redirect, replay/resume, correlation, no wake wart, and stock-assistant isolation before promotion. -- Three disclosure layers remain useful: a concise always-on core plus plugin append, one activated lifecycle skill, and resources read when their role becomes active. -- Core owns universal epistemic conduct and interviewing moves; the plugin owns only the consequences of software behavior and Gherkin. The five additive registers—Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification—accept those additions without becoming a lifecycle or schema. -- Prompting and recognition remain Brunch-owned; Gherkin's grammar and semantics must come from its authoritative formalism source; Flue remains the only packaging mechanism. -- Elicitation, recording, target authoring, and checking remain distinct semantic roles. Honest output still requires a recoverable account of person evidence, agent proposals, current-versus-proposed behavior, conflict, deferral, open matters, and capability limits. -- Parse validity, step-definition binding, runtime executability, and behavioral adequacy are separate claims. A plugin must report only the checks it actually ran. +## Later and opportunistic concerns -The exact SDCPN topology does not generalize. File count, phase count, and a terminal tool-mediated construction branch are consequences of that formalism's distance and lossiness, not core architecture. Gherkin projection is textual and near the behavior account, so authoring may serve as a correction surface after one coherent rule/example rather than waiting for a terminal construction phase. It still needs a companion workpiece while authorship, uncertainty, or unresolved behavior remains consequential; hiding that material in comments would only create a worse sidecar inside the target. +### Host/session continuity and compaction -Three shapes were compared: +Host choice remains unasked at the real boundary: shared origin, picker placement, and whether switching is start-only or mid-net. Fixed Brunch mode may carry an early tracer; admit only the choice the visible story requires. -- **A — Mirror SDCPN exactly:** separate behavior workpiece, construction phase, construction resource, and checks. Rejected as overfitting a distant, tool-mediated formalism to a low-distance textual projection. -- **B — Use `.feature` as both workpiece and target:** rejected because polished Gherkin cannot honestly preserve unsupported rules, agent authorship, current-versus-proposed status, conflicts, deferrals, and unchecked bindings without contaminating comments with a hidden second artifact. -- **C — Keep a lightweight near-target behavior workpiece and combine Gherkin authoring with checks:** selected as the current paper-design hypothesis. The workpiece stores feature purpose, rules, concrete context/event-or-action/outcome examples, domain terms, status, authorship, and open matters without requiring `Given`/`When`/`Then`. The skill may draft target text as a correction surface, while one combined resource owns document structure, grammar semantics, factoring, parse checks, binding honesty, revision, and delivery. +Mission 5 may use fixed Brunch mode. Mission 9 owns only the host/picker/continuity choice the complete six-beat rehearsal actually requires; do not pull broad host productization earlier. -A read-only Oracle review independently selected Shape C for the same invariant: the workpiece should carry only the epistemic delta that Gherkin cannot. Its agreement is design advice, not runtime evidence. It also sharpened the reversal conditions: repeated authorship laundering would justify a workpiece less shaped like the target; repeated zero-delta transcription would justify collapsing toward target text plus a minimal open-matters companion; a real codebase step-binding capability could earn a separately disclosed checking phase. +Working session hypothesis: net id discriminates one Flue conversation per principal; save/load resumes it, new net creates another. Today localStorage maps conversation ids by `netId`, while capture keys principal + conversation id. If ids regenerate/collide, rekey. Locked: net id is only a discriminator, not a Brunch target-document ontology. Keep rejected alternatives rejected: “net equals target-document” and sweep into a throwaway store for later splicing. -Fog remains empirical. Early target drafting may improve correction, or it may anchor people to agent wording; no Gherkin run has tested that trade-off. The compact append → skill → resource route has not been exercised for this plugin. No parser or step corpus exists locally to support parse or binding claims. A future tracer should first wire the smallest real software-behavior/Gherkin path through Flue, observe whether required resources are actually read, preserve authoring provenance, and distinguish authored-only output from parser, binding, and execution evidence before deepening this paper topology. +Before claiming long-running provenance, prove panel/transcript/workpiece recovery across real Flue compaction (`compaction-vs-durable-history` / FE-1386). Current recovery scrapes the last `runbook-ir` fence; summary loss would break it. A short rehearsal may avoid compaction only if the handoff declares uncompacted-history dependence. Compaction is history reconstruction, not projection sequencing; control to compact/show summaries waits for evidence. -# Dafny third-reference pressure test — verification intent, formalization, and proof +### Voice -The article [“From Intent to Proof: Dafny Verification for Web Apps”](http://midspiral.com/blog/from-intent-to-proof-dafny-verification-for-web-apps/) exposes a third plugin pairing and a program-level concern: whether Brunch can help people identify valuable formal-verification use cases, state what they intend to guarantee, and specify exactly how that intent should become a checkable proof obligation. This remains design capture, not a production route or a decision to make Brunch generate verified implementations. +Voice is a git-parent/integration constraint, not a mission. Stack on `kostandin/h-6763-openai-canonical-speech` when it is the parent, reuse the Mission 1 `POST /api/chat` dock, and resolve UUID-per-net versus `petrinaut-preview:${netId}`, stolen versus configured route, and `submitText` without `brunch_ask`. Brunch owns no provider audio. -The umbrella concern **formal-verification use cases** is not itself a valid Brunch plugin boundary. It names neither one reusable subject-matter typology nor one target formalism. The current candidate pairing is: +### Observability and simulation viewing -- **Domain typology: software correctness obligations.** Reusable ways to recognize and investigate claims about values, states, operations, representations, histories, refinement, termination, authority, and trusted boundaries. -- **Target formalism: Dafny specification modules and program contracts.** Dafny types, predicates, preconditions, postconditions, frame and termination clauses, abstract interfaces, and lemma statements whose actual proof status can be checked by the Dafny verifier. +Brunch has local content-free OTLP/gRPC export and graceful flush; hosted reachability and real normal/failure attributes remain open. Prove `gen_ai.conversation.id` equals Flue instance id and decide `traceparent` propagation. Keep prompt/response/tool content off until privacy/retention/access policy. Mission 5 needs only tracer latency/tool evidence; broad OTel remains a release gate. -Two alternatives lose at this boundary. **Verified state evolution × Dafny kernel/domain contracts** overfits the article's state/action presentation and would miss correctness obligations that are functional, representational, refinement-based, boundary-facing, or otherwise not state-transition shaped. **Formal-verification brief × no selected prover** is target-neutral and therefore not a plugin under the paired-unit contract; its useful content survives as the workpiece and as plugin-selection activity above any one plugin. +Simulated-conversation viewing is a parallel spike, not a protocol rewrite. Drive with `createFlueClient → send → wait → history()`, not PTY polling. The human observer uses the same conversation URL. `:4321` can follow text through `useFlueAgent`; rendering `dynamic-tool`, `data-*`, and skill activation would make it useful. The missing capability is a second observer, not a Herdr webview or mandatory Petrinaut client tools. -The source repository sharpens the distinction between a reusable typology and one project's contract. It has no uniform `Model`/`Action`/`Inv`/`Valid`/`Apply` interface. Replay uses `Init`, `Inv`, `Apply`, and `Normalize` plus initialization and preservation lemmas; Authority uses partial `TryStep`; MultiCollaboration adds `Rebase`, `Candidates`, `Explains`, and `CandidatesComplete`. A kernel interface is therefore supplied project context to inspect and satisfy, not ontology to bake into a plugin. Those names remain useful recognition examples, never required elicitation decomposition. +### Simulation-backed checking -The article's headline invariant argument also requires qualification. Transition preservation establishes reachable-state safety only when initialization establishes the invariant, and it establishes only the property expressed by that invariant. The non-negative counter invariant does not detect the stale-redo bug because the wrong historical state can still satisfy `n ≥ 0`; the replay source separately proves that a new `Do` clears the future and proves undo/redo laws. The plugin must therefore recognize more than state invariants: +No evidence yet says a non-empty parser-valid net behaves like the workpiece. Candidate oracle: run Petrinaut simulation against qualitative objective expectations. The hermetic non-empty net is a fixture; the paid empty net is not. Promote only if cheap and discriminating for the selected revision; otherwise retain human semantic inspection and disclose the limitation. -- initialization and representation invariants; -- function and operation preconditions, postconditions, and frame conditions; -- transition preservation, rejection behavior, and unchanged-on-failure guarantees; -- history, trace, round-trip, determinism, and idempotence laws; -- abstraction, refinement, simulation, normalization, and intent-preservation relations; -- termination and progress obligations where Dafny and the intended scope can express them; and -- assumptions and trusted boundaries whose failure sits outside the proved claim. +### Other substrate and product hypotheses -This is a recognition repertoire, not a closed property-kind schema. The person states what failure would matter and what should be true in their language. Formalization chooses the mathematical objects, quantification, domains, predicates, and obligation shape only after that intent is recoverable. A familiar property family may suggest a question or candidate encoding; it must not manufacture a requirement. +AI SDK 7 `HarnessAgent` is undecided: it is the converse of the current door, resuming a harness session by chat id. Flue already owns that session and `transport-aisdk` adapts UI. A Pi/Claude Code harness is another binding substrate or Flue replacement, not the simulation viewer. Re-enter only with a concrete consumer. -The Ampcode architecture survives at the role level: concise core plus plugin append, one activated skill, additive five-register teaching, a recoverable workpiece, target-formalism guidance, and capability-aware checks. Dafny does not inherit Gherkin's combined authoring/checking shape. Formalization is semantic, high-stakes, and tool-mediated, and a passing verifier can create more false confidence than parse acceptance; separate Dafny authoring and proof-evidence resources are therefore plausible if a tracer earns them. File and phase cardinality remain plugin consequences rather than core law. +Exploded-view net prototypes belong on Petrinaut website host routes, not `:4321`. If `ChatAgent` leaves the app, put it under `packages//`; the app stays shell. HASH embed remains stock unless explicitly opted in. Historical Conditions 1/2/4/5 remain batch evidence; no TUI, retired SDCPN elicitor, generalized `useElicitation()` runtime, loader, workflow engine, or second model-facing agent. -Three distinctions are non-negotiable across the workpiece, target projection, and delivery: +## Migration disposition -1. **Intent ≠ formalization ≠ proof.** What the person wants to be true, how the agent encoded it, and what Dafny verified are separately attributable. A verified `Explains` predicate proves consequences of its authored definition, not that the definition captures human intent. -2. **Stated ≠ assumed ≠ discharged ≠ trusted.** A lemma signature states an obligation; `assume` or `{:axiom}` removes an obligation by trust; a verifier result for the exact source discharges what it actually checked; an external boundary remains trusted or out of scope. None may silently become another. -3. **Verified source ≠ compiled artifact ≠ integrated system.** The examined repository verifies and translates in separate commands, translation may use `--no-verify`, some CI paths are skipped, and JavaScript marshalling, wrappers, UI dispatch, authentication, persistence, concurrency, compiler/runtime correctness, and deployment remain outside many theorems. Every claim names its source artifact, tool/version, assumptions, skipped material, and trusted perimeter. +The candidate split has one live authority, one compact spine, four provisional drafts, and no Mission 4 or Mission 8 draft. Its source-to-destination ledger is: -A fourth check follows from those distinctions: preconditions, admissibility predicates, abstraction functions, and candidate relations can make a theorem vacuous or weaker than the person's intent. The elicitor must ask what inputs or states the guarantee is allowed to exclude, seek a witness and nearby counterexample, and surface every formalization move that weakens, strengthens, normalizes, or reinterprets the original claim. Proof search may propose such a change; it may never edit the authoritative specification silently to obtain green verification. +| Previous `MISSION.next.md` section | Surviving planning home | Disposition and consequence | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Opening authority warning and M1–M8 topology | Current authority and accepted spine | Condensed and renumbered to the accepted M4–M9 sequence; deployment branch history transition explicitly excluded. | +| FE-1476 delivery frame, confidence map, cross-milestone obligations, mechanism restraint | FE-1476 product frame; shared constraints | Condensed with low-confidence questions, six beats, proof obligations, and anti-ontology restraint preserved. | +| Universal teaching backlog | Unallocated backlog / Universal elicitation teaching | Retained with dosage, duplicate-removal, baseline, and discriminating-probe conditions. | +| SDCPN investigation backlog | Unallocated backlog / SDCPN investigation and construction teaching | Retained with typology choices, adversarial probes, return-to-elicitation conditions, and construction ownership. | +| Workpiece structure hypotheses and observed strain | Unallocated backlog / Workpiece hypotheses and cold-reading obligations | Retained with A–D/alternate shapes, cold-reader duties, rejected mechanisms, and re-entry conditions. | +| Prior capture/workpiece seam hypotheses and probes | Unallocated backlog / Capture/workpiece seam history | Retained with A–D, shadow join, measurements, and changed FE-1476 consequence. Draft 5 selects support-links-only without becoming a second home for the taxonomy. | +| Former Mission 5 traceable projection | Draft 5 and Draft 6 | Split deliberately: prepared-pair evidence-backed why moves to Mission 5; automatic meaningful projection, provider-schema repair, repeat/change identity, and derivations move to Mission 6. | +| Former Mission 6 reviewer revision | Draft 7 | Moved at full mission-specific detail, with foreground synthesis default and observer only as strain-triggered re-entry. | +| Former Mission 7 rehearsal and optimisation handoff | Draft 9; FE-1476 frame; Later host concerns | Consumer handoff stays deliberately shallow in Mission 9; six-beat floor and host continuity remain shared until the accepted consumer requires them. | +| Former Mission 8 deployment cluster | Mission 8 consumed deployment contract | Reconciled subsection by subsection against branch evidence into landed application contract, open infrastructure/release gates, and superseded proposal; no remote deployment inferred. | +| Parallel and asynchronous proof tracks | Parallel and asynchronous proof tracks | Retained with renumbered joins and provisional seam names. | +| Inferential observer-fold hypothesis and extraction ladder | Shared constraints / Foreground revision and observer re-entry | Retained as contingent evidence and re-entry mechanics, never planned implementation. | +| Delivery-adjacent host continuity | Later / Host-session continuity, compaction, and Voice | Retained with fixed-mode allowance, Mission 9 rehearsal owner, session hypothesis, rejected target-document shapes, compaction risk, and voice parent constraint. | +| Later observability, simulated viewing, simulation check, `HarnessAgent` | Later and opportunistic concerns | Retained with promotion conditions and deployment evidence updated from Mission 8. | +| Closed runbook/workpiece record | Mission 3 split and construction evidence | Retained as the accepted-workpiece/falsified-construction split; first provider-schema owner remapped to Mission 6. | +| Gherkin pressure test | Unallocated backlog / Gherkin pressure test | Retained with Shape C, rejected A/B, evidence ladder, Oracle qualification, and reversal conditions. | +| Dafny pressure test | Unallocated backlog / Dafny pressure test | Retained with pairing, alternatives, claim ladders, vacuity/trust boundaries, artifact floor, Oracle qualification, and reversals. | +| Standing decisions | Shared constraints and standing locks | Retained with packaged-B disposition, authority boundaries, capture/workpiece separation, platform locks, and no generalized runtime/TUI. | +| Structured-question semantics from accepted planning | Unallocated backlog / Structured-question vertical capability | Added to its sole planning home with the required model-to-resumed-turn proof and no `brunch_ask` reactivation. | -A plausible single-skill lifecycle is: orient to the decision and cost of failure; identify one candidate correctness claim and its verification envelope; elicit concrete satisfying and violating cases; maintain an intent/formalization/evidence workpiece; inspect any supplied kernel or code contract; author or revise a Dafny specification module; show a semantic diff back to the person; run syntax, resolution, verification, and compilation checks only when those capabilities exist; and deliver the exact claim ladder and trust boundary. Render-only and verify-only branches consume a supplied workpiece or exact target artifact without reopening an interview. +Material was removed only where the deployment branch's observed application artifact superseded its earlier proposal or where a spine summary now points to a detailed draft. All open consequences and re-entry conditions remain above. The migration was documentation-only: Mission 4 remains live, `MISSION.md` and the archive remain unchanged, and no future mission or remote deployment was promoted. -The minimum target artifact is a **Dafny specification module**, not a full implementation or completed proof: types or abstract types, specification predicates, function or method signatures, `requires`/`ensures`/`reads`/`modifies`/`decreases` clauses where relevant, and named lemma statements. An abstract module may make the contract checkable while remaining non-compilable. Missing proof bodies and axiom-backed declarations remain visibly stated or assumed, never proved. A companion obligation manifest maps each person-recognizable claim to its Dafny declaration, formalization choices, current evidence status, and trusted dependencies. +## Planning-split close record -The workpiece carries the epistemic delta the Dafny source cannot honestly settle by itself: purpose and verification economics; the failure or harm to prevent; intended claim in the person's language; concrete witnesses, counterexamples, and boundary cases; relevant state, operations, inputs, outputs, histories, and observations; current implementation or kernel context; assumptions and environmental dependencies; proposed formalization with authorship; strengthening or weakening deltas; obligation and tool status; and the unverified integration perimeter. It should also permit the honest conclusion that the candidate is not presently worth or suited to Dafny verification because the behavior is unresolved, the property is primarily empirical or performance-based, the integration boundary dominates, or proof cost exceeds the consequence. +Outcome: **planning split completed on 2026-09-02 against fixed point `06ed66c083`.** That commit is the reproducible before-state containing the committed side-quest contract and the old `MISSION.next.md`. -A read-only Oracle review independently selected this pairing over the state-evolution and target-neutral alternatives. Its strongest reversal evidence is operational. Multiple independent Dafny projects converging on one stable state/action contract could justify a narrower state-evolution plugin. Repeated real conversations in which Dafny-shaped recognition anchors people away from a clearly better target such as temporal model checking or property-based testing would justify a target-selection stage above plugin activation. Until either appears, kernel shape is input, prover selection is upstream, and the plugin owns software-correctness elicitation plus honest Dafny projection. +Semantic review identity and result: the 2026-09-02 orchestrating-agent consolidated review against `06ed66c083` accepted the architecture, topology, preservation work, Mission 8 account, and expeditionary posture, then required the five focused corrections now reflected here. The implementation-side cold reviews are contemporaneous supporting evidence, not a durable oracle: after correction they reported no remaining blocker, including Mission 9's consumer-defined full-model broadening and fog-line. The reproducible semantic review packet is `06ed66c083`'s `SIDE_QUEST.md` and `MISSION.next.md` versus current `AGENTS.md`, `MISSION.next.md`, and all five files under `docs/mission-drafts/`; the checklist is the migration ledger categories above plus authority, Mission 8 truth, line/readiness separation, Mission 9 broadening/fog, and draft lifecycle ownership. -Fog remains before a tracer: whether formal contract text helps people correct intent or anchors them to agent-authored mathematics; whether a Dafny abstract module plus obligation manifest is the smallest useful target; how a semantic diff can expose quantifier, domain, precondition, and trust-boundary changes without demanding formal-methods fluency; and whether use-case triage can remain additive to universal elicitation rather than becoming a generic consulting interview. The first real proof should be one narrow correctness claim in an existing codebase, its exact Dafny contract, one verifier run, and a human decision on whether the intent/formalization/proof separation stayed legible. +Reproducible commands, run from the repository root: -The Ampcode paper prototype now carries this conclusion at the design boundary without pretending the Dafny plugin is specified: `core/SYSTEM.md` owns the universal source-intent → recoverable-account → target-transformation → check-evidence → surrounding-system claim separation, while `README.md` records the prospective pairing, disclosure shape, property-family repertoire, claim ladder, and reversal evidence. No Dafny plugin resource files or production wiring were added. +```shell +ROOT="libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent" +git show 06ed66c083:"$ROOT/SIDE_QUEST.md" >/dev/null +git show 06ed66c083:"$ROOT/MISSION.next.md" >/dev/null +git diff --no-ext-diff 06ed66c083 -- "$ROOT/AGENTS.md" "$ROOT/MISSION.next.md" "$ROOT/docs/mission-drafts" +git status --short -- "$ROOT/docs/mission-drafts" -# Standing decisions - -Not missions. - -## Ownership and teaching mechanism - -Mission 4 selects one mounted plugin job skill with core-authored universal elicitation packaged as a lazy supporting resource. This is a runtime packaging decision, not a transfer of semantic authority: core remains the single authored home for context-, domain-, editor-, and output-formalism-independent elicitation judgment; plugin job skills package that source beside their own domain-typology / target-formalism resources. A concise core prompt and an earned plugin append carry mounted-lifetime invariants; the job skill carries procedures and judgment and discloses resources as needed. Flue `useSkill` is not always-on `useInstruction`. - -The Flue composition side quest compared that topology with a separately mounted core `elicitation` skill through three frozen instruments. V3 removed the legacy-core-prompt confound and repeated the discriminating opening case: after `sdcpn-modelling` activation, independent elicitation activated in 0/3 Candidate A runs while packaged universal plus SDCPN disclosure completed in 2/3 Candidate B runs. Both candidates correctly avoided universal disclosure across all four construct-only and resolvable-review restraint runs. The only revised knowledge-gap review pair bypassed the shared job skill in both candidates, so v3 did not behaviorally validate B across jobs; it exposed review routing as Mission 4 content work. The architecture disposition is therefore: select packaged B for current production because A exhibits repeated topology-specific activation strain, while preserving the evaluation’s narrower invalid/both-weak protocol verdict. Do not mount A or run a fourth topology campaign by momentum. Independent skill identity may re-enter if a second real plugin or changed model/framework behavior demonstrates reliable cross-skill activation or material duplication/context strain. - -Evidence: [`docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/comparison.md`](docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/comparison.md), with immutable v1/v2/v3 manifests and raw traces beside it. - -Ownership boundaries: - -- **Prompting and recognition guidance are Brunch-owned.** Interview policy, tips, heuristics, motifs, candidate entity/relationship lenses, and “how to build” prose live here. The latest `petrinautAiPrompt` is coverage evidence, not text to copy; its interview and “make it up” policy do not govern Brunch elicitation. -- **Contracts are Petrinaut-owned.** TypeScript API contracts and payload shapes for nets and Petrinaut are consumed by import or mechanical generation, never hand-copied. FE-1516's one-day prose drift remains the counterexample. -- **Skill packaging is Flue-owned.** An authored skill directory is statically imported through its bare `SKILL.md` specifier and mounted with `useSkill`; no custom frontmatter parser, hand-enumerated resource list, or source-relative runtime reads. -- **Assertion mechanics, if proven, are harness-owned; SDCPN hints are target-formalism policy.** Scheduling, evidence spans, revision lineage, storage, and failure semantics must not know `resource`, `shift`, `place`, or other SDCPN concepts. Optional hint vocabulary is injected guidance and remains advisory. - -The universal ↔ SDCPN provenance migration remains an editorial practice recorded per edit, not automation. Mission 3 exercised it zero times on new real evidence. - -## Capture and workpiece relationship - -Current production paths remain independent because no join has been proven. Mission 2's `apply-sweep` still writes model-free envelopes with empty payloads; the runbook path still writes no capture state. FE-1476 now supplies a concrete reason to test a narrow relationship: evidence-backed workpiece meaning must support provenance and revision. That requirement does not ratify the previous designed two-artifact join, a one-artifact capture/workpiece merger, or an idle capture store waiting for types. - -Three premature convergence shapes remain refused: - -- A comprehensive capture ledger → typed workpiece fold designed before one real assertion-to-net tracer. -- One artifact where a sweep payload is automatically the canonical workpiece update. -- Restoring kinds, slots, precision grades, completion algebra, plugin runtime, or repertoire YAML as the teaching vehicle. - -Condition 5 remains the strain threshold: typed mapping plus in-loop LLM judgment produced ordinary question turns on the order of minutes. Re-admit interpretation only off the foreground path or at an explicit phase barrier, and measure where the mechanism becomes untenable. +actual=$(for draft in "$ROOT"/docs/mission-drafts/[0-9]-*.md; do basename "$draft"; done) +expected=$'5-capture-backed-review.md\n6-traceable-projection.md\n7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md\n9-optimisation-handoff.md' +test "$actual" = "$expected" +test "$(rg -l '^> Draft cluster only\. Not execution authority\. Do not implement until this cluster is re-evaluated and cut into `MISSION\.md`\.$' "$ROOT"/docs/mission-drafts/[0-9]-*.md | wc -l | tr -d ' ')" = 4 +test -z "$(rg -l '^## (Status|Imperative|Proof)$' "$ROOT"/docs/mission-drafts/[0-9]-*.md)" +python3 -c 'from pathlib import Path; from urllib.parse import unquote; import re; root=Path("libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent"); files=[root/"AGENTS.md",root/"MISSION.next.md",*(sorted((root/"docs/mission-drafts").glob("*.md")))]; links=[(f,t) for f in files for t in re.findall(r"(?/`; the app remains the shell. -- Historical Conditions 1 / 2 / 4 / 5 remain batch evidence. The useful drive loop is `createFlueClient` → `send` → `wait` → `history()`. No TUI and no retired SDCPN elicitor. -- No HASH embed path that talks to Brunch is in the current scope. +The temporary side quest was removed only after the result and review packet were recorded and the checks above passed. This is a non-authoritative close record: it does not close Mission 4, execute Missions 5–9, promote Mission 4's architecture, or claim Brunch is remotely deployed. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md deleted file mode 100644 index 74ffc29ee41..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/SIDE_QUEST.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,495 +0,0 @@ -# Side quest — split the future mission spine into provisional drafts - -## Status - -Active. User-authorized temporary planning remediation inside Mission 4. This file is not a second mission and does not authorize implementation of Missions 5–9 or modification of Mission 4’s product architecture. - -## Relationship to Mission 4 - -Mission 4 remains the sole live execution authority in [`MISSION.md`](MISSION.md). Owner-led architecture work has expanded [`MISSION.next.md`](MISSION.next.md) to roughly 855 lines / 112 KB, where accepted future mission boundaries now compete with shared product framing, standing constraints, historical hypotheses, deployment detail, and unallocated backlog. The owner has ratified progressive disclosure of detailed future clusters into explicit non-authoritative mission-draft files. - -This side quest repairs the planning information hierarchy so Mission 4 and its successors can be cut without losing fidelity or creating competing authority. It does not close Mission 4, promote the selected prompt/skill/workpiece architecture, or alter the frozen Mission 3 control. - -The Flue composition side quest is closed and recorded in commit `bee37b5e47351c92bde4811187da211736efc6d0`. Its architecture disposition is an input: Mission 4 selects one mounted plugin job skill with core-authored universal elicitation packaged as a lazy resource. Do not reopen that experiment here. - -## Imperative - -Replace the single sprawling future-planning document with one compact canonical spine plus detailed provisional mission drafts while preserving exactly one live execution authority and every consequential current planning item. - -Make authority obvious from file names, headers, pointers, and lifecycle rules. Preserve full semantic fidelity through relocation and condensation: accepted decisions, rejected alternatives, re-entry conditions, scenario classes, evidence, constraints, fog, and stop conditions must each retain one discoverable planning home. - -## Target topology - -```text -libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/ -├── AGENTS.md -├── MISSION.md sole execution authority; unchanged here -├── MISSION.next.md compact spine, shared frame, unallocated backlog -├── SIDE_QUEST.md this temporary remediation; remove at close -└── docs/ - ├── mission-drafts/ - │ ├── README.md - │ ├── 5-capture-backed-review.md - │ ├── 6-traceable-projection.md - │ ├── 7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md - │ └── 9-optimisation-handoff.md - └── mission-archive/ retain existing location -``` - -Do not create Mission 4 or Mission 8 drafts. Mission 4 is live. Mission 8 ran on the parallel `ln/fe-1569-brunch-agent-deployment` branch and is currently stopped at an application-to-infrastructure handoff, not remotely deployed or accepted. - -## Authority contract - -### `MISSION.md` - -The sole execution authority. It alone contains final `Status`, `Imperative`, `Throughline`, `Proof`, `Constraints`, `Fog-line`, `Stop or reorient`, and `Deferred` sections. Do not edit it in this side quest. - -### `MISSION.next.md` - -The canonical compact future spine, shared product frame, cross-mission constraints, and unallocated-backlog index. It is not executable and must not duplicate each detailed draft. - -### `docs/mission-drafts/` - -Detailed provisional context repositories. A draft may preserve a visible product hypothesis, contract stratum, provisional throughline, tracer floor, readiness obligations, joins, constraints, fog, stop conditions, evidence, and rejected alternatives. It must not contain `Status`, a final `Imperative`, or a final `Proof`, and it must begin with an explicit non-authority warning. - -### `SIDE_QUEST.md` - -At most one temporary user-authorized experiment or remediation under the live mission. Remove this file after its outcome is recorded and the planning split is verified. - -### `docs/mission-archive/` - -Accepted closed missions retained as evidence, not marching orders. Keep the existing path and links. - -## Accepted spine to encode - -```text -M4 ship accepted prompt/skill/workpiece architecture -M5 ship mechanical-capture-backed why review over an honest prebuilt pair -M6 ship one meaningful region of automatic traceable projection -M7 ship bounded authorized reviewer revision and scoped patch -M8 parallel deployment mission stopped at application/infra handoff; consume actual contract -M9 ship accepted optimisation handoff, detailed only after consumer contract -``` - -Mission 4’s exit handoff is a selected frozen workpiece, exact source Flue conversation, exact candidate instrument manifest, and comparative evaluation/adjudication. - -Every numbered mission from Mission 4 onward aims to ship a distinct visible product advancement through the deployed Petrinaut/Brunch boundary once that boundary exists. Architecture work, schema repair, evaluation, fixtures, rehearsal, and spikes may be necessary evidence but cannot be the sole mission outcome. - -The six-beat FE-1476 review/revise story is the minimum integrated floor, not the product or demo ceiling. The broader demo scenario portfolio has not yet been enumerated. State that honestly. When a draft is later cut into authority, the live mission must name the scenario portfolio and contract classes then accepted within its stratum. - -Each future draft must distinguish: - -1. **Throughline proof** — the smallest deployed end-to-end path proving the capability crosses the real product boundary. -2. **Readiness gate** — the decision point after that path works: which lateral obligations have become enumerable, which are required to trust the current visible capability, and which first become load-bearing for the next visible product advance. -3. **Stratum closure** — breadth, fidelity, invalid-state, durability, identity, failure, and oracle obligations completed across one named contract layer and accepted scenario/peer set. - -Use these terms in planning documents rather than adding more meanings to Brunch’s elicitation-specific “slice” and “sweep” vocabulary. - -```text -prior throughline proof -→ inherited stratum closure required by this mission -→ new visible throughline proof -→ readiness gate -├─ close current product contract before this mission ships -├─ admit named lateral obligations into the next product mission -└─ leave unearned breadth beyond the horizon -``` - -A vertical tracer does not automatically require a horizontal completion pass. Stratum closure is earned when the real path exposes an enumerable peer set or invariant, the current or next accepted product consumer depends on it, and a credible oracle can distinguish closure from presence. Close obligations in the current mission when its visible claim would otherwise be false or unsafe. Carry them into the next mission only when that mission’s new throughline is the first real consumer that makes the broader property load-bearing. Record the owner, re-entry point, and oracle; “a later mission handles it” is not a disposition. - -The operational model is recursive: - -```text -survey the real territory, not only its maps -→ establish a working line of communication, transport, and evidence -→ stage a dependable camp/base by closing the contract stratum the line has made load-bearing -→ launch the next survey and throughline from that stronger departure point -``` - -Survey means inspecting or probing the real production/deployed boundary; source documents and intended architecture guide the probe but do not settle terrain claims. Establishing a line means crossing entry to visible exit with the least mechanism that actually carries product data, control, evidence, and failure. Staging a base means making the route dependable for its accepted consumers through the earned peer coverage, identity, durability, recovery, observability, and oracles—not fortifying every imaginable direction. Base-building may close inside the mission that established the line or be inherited by the next mission whose visible advance first depends on it, but the handoff must state which: a provisional route must never be silently treated as a dependable base. - -Use the model to reject four failure modes: designing from maps without probing terrain; building infrastructure before a route or consumer exists; declaring a tracer to be a hardened base; and sweeping every adjacent contract merely because one route exposed it. - -One green element, region, or correction does not automatically close a mission. “All scenarios” means the named portfolio and contract classes accepted at cut time, not every imaginable operational process. - -## Detailed draft contracts - -### Mission 5 — capture-backed review of an honest prebuilt pair - -Visible advance: through deployed Brunch, a reviewer types a visible SDCPN element name or id and receives the current workpiece rationale, prebuilder projection rationale, and mechanically retained source evidence. The product identifies the net and derivation as prebuilt and claims no automatic projection. - -Provisional throughline: - -```text -Mission 4 source conversation -→ explicit harness-owned Mission 2 mechanical sweep -→ durable exact-evidence capture ledger -→ selected Markdown workpiece with smallest stable reference seam -→ honestly prebuilt SDCPN + minimal derivation fixture -→ reviewer types visible element name/id in deployed panel -→ provenance capability resolves element → derivation → workpiece → captures -→ evidence-grounded why answer -``` - -Tracer floor: one consequential visible element resolves to its current workpiece passage, projection rationale, exact evidence excerpts, and relevant uncertainty, assumption, or loss; one deliberately broken link visibly returns unsupported/unavailable. - -Readiness must assess every consequential element in the selected prebuilt pair: resolvable provenance or explicit unsupported/unlinked disposition, plus duplicate/ambiguous/stale identity, missing evidence, capture replay, durability, cross-owner refusal, stock-assistant coexistence, visible failure, context source, latency/usage, transcript fallback, and stale-state risk. - -Flue history remains the canonical conversation log. Mechanical capture envelopes remain immutable, exact-evidence, domain-opaque source records. The foreground Markdown workpiece owns semantic synthesis. The model neither receives nor schedules a sweep tool. Do not add typed capture payloads, assertion cards, a capture-to-workpiece reducer, an observer, or an ontology. - -Minimum currently earned seam: current workpiece revision, workpiece reference, capture evidence references, net element ids, and projection rationale. Its exact representation remains fog for the real tracer. - -Capture becomes product data. Mission 5 must consume the actual Mission 8 durability boundary; task-local JSON cannot support a durable provenance claim across a claimed replacement boundary. - -### Mission 6 — automatic traceable projection - -Visible advance: through deployed Brunch, a person requests projection of a bounded workpiece region, sees a non-empty semantically meaningful live SDCPN region, and can use Mission 5’s why operation for consequential generated elements. - -The provider-visible nested-schema repair is the first risk-retiring tracer inside the mission, not completion. The selected region must be operationally meaningful, visually inspectable, exercise the required canonical types/parameters/places/transitions/arcs, preserve stable caller-supplied ids, carry derivations, and support Mission 7’s correction. A toy pair, empty net, parser acceptance, or hermetic-only result is insufficient. - -Readiness must assess all canonical schema/mutation contracts used by the bounded stratum, rejection/repair, unsupported defaults, construction-opened losses, repeated projection and changed input, stale/partial state, identity and derivation churn, visible partial failure, provenance completeness, semantic correspondence, path isolation, and latency/usage/transcript fallback. Mission 9 owns broadening to the accepted full handoff scenario rather than Mission 6 stopping automatically at one tracer or expanding without bound. - -The projector consumes the current workpiece, not captures as semantic IR and not the transcript as primary input. Petrinaut owns canonical schemas and mutations; do not hand-copy its field shapes into Brunch. - -### Mission 7 — bounded authorized reviewer revision and scoped patch - -Visible advance: an explicitly authorized reviewer challenges or refines one selected operational meaning in 3–5 focused turns, inspects prior/current workpiece meaning and its change account, and sees the linked SDCPN region patch without unrelated churn. The updated why answer includes retained earlier and newly captured reviewer evidence. - -Reviewer authority is scenario-declared and bounded to the chosen region. Evidence remains attributed. Recency alone never authorizes overwrite. Resolve correction versus qualification, contextual coexistence, or conflict before canonical state changes. - -Default revision mechanism: one bounded foreground phase-boundary synthesis over the prior workpiece revision plus the newly mechanically captured reviewer evidence. This is the decisive observer-strain gate. - -Tracer floor: one selected operational distinction produces an inspectable attributed revision, bounded patch or explicit refusal, updated provenance, and stable unrelated ids/behavior. - -Readiness must exercise the currently accepted peer classes within reach: correction, qualification, contextual coexistence, unresolved conflict, rejected/unsupported change, stale revision, impact widening, and any additional class accepted at cut time. Record preservation/disposition of prior meaning, semantic diff, evidence/link churn, latency/usage/blocking, transcript fallback, and compaction/recovery effects where crossed. - -Observer/fold remains absent if foreground synthesis works. Repeated consequential blocking, loss of prior meaning, stale state, unrecoverability, or unavoidable unbounded-history dependence triggers stop/reorientation; do not implement an observer by momentum. - -### Mission 9 — accepted optimisation handoff - -Keep deliberately shallow until Chris and Yannis accept a concrete consumer contract. Known visible outcome: the deployed review/revise path produces a complete selected SDCPN and a visible/exportable package from which they can begin one agreed optimisation experiment. - -Known artifact floor: revised workpiece, final SDCPN, capture-backed evidence and derivation, selected scenario and parameters, assumptions, omissions, losses, and unresolved limits. - -Before Mission 9 is cut, obtain accepted input artifacts, one concrete optimisation question, required scenario/parameter representation, execution boundary, expected returned result, and minimum credibility checks. Do not invent an export bundle here. The six-beat rehearsal proves that the shipped handoff came through the real path; rehearsal is not the sole output. - -## `MISSION.next.md` target structure - -Use this information hierarchy, adjusting labels only when migration exposes a concrete need: - -```text -# Brunch future mission spine - -authority warning - -## Current authority and accepted spine - -## FE-1476 product frame -### Named scenario portfolio -### Tracer floor and contract readiness -### Cross-mission proof obligations - -## Shared constraints and standing locks -### Evidence, workpiece, capture, and projection -### Foreground revision and observer re-entry -### Product and host boundary -### Mission 8 consumed deployment contract - -## Detailed provisional clusters - -## Unallocated backlog -### Universal elicitation teaching -### SDCPN investigation and construction teaching -### Workpiece hypotheses and cold-reading obligations -### Capture/workpiece seam history and rejected mechanisms -### Gherkin and Dafny pressure tests -### Structured-question vertical capability - -## Later and opportunistic concerns -### Host/session continuity and compaction -### Voice -### Observability and simulation viewing -### Simulation-backed checking -### Other substrate and product hypotheses -``` - -Retain the six FE-1476 beats and these durable relationships: - -```text -conversation evidence → workpiece meaning -workpiece meaning → projection decision → SDCPN element -workpiece revision → bounded net change -``` - -Retain compact cross-mission obligations for workpiece sufficiency, projection fidelity, evidence provenance, revision integrity, patch locality, Petrinaut semantic acceptance, deployed interaction quality, and visible failure. - -## Draft-file template - -Each numbered draft uses this information hierarchy. Omit a section only when no earned content exists; do not collapse known precision merely because a heading is optional. - -```markdown -# Draft Mission N — Name - -> Draft cluster only. Not execution authority. Do not implement until this cluster is re-evaluated and cut into `MISSION.md`. - -## Cold-start reads - -## Visible product advance - -## Contract stratum - -## Boundary crossings and current throughline hypothesis - -## Throughline proof floor - -## Readiness ratchet - -### Inherited stratum closure - -### Readiness gate after the new throughline - -## Candidate evidence and oracles - -## Verification approach - -## Inputs and joins - -## Risks and assumptions - -## Accepted constraints and guarded invariants - -## Cross-cutting obligations - -## Expected touched paths - -## Fog-line - -## Stop or reorient - -## Carried evidence and rejected alternatives -``` - -`Cold-start reads` contains pointers to exact canonical paths or ids, not copied content. It answers whether a separate builder thread could resolve the draft without the originating conversation. If the required reads cannot be named, the cluster remains under-scoped. - -`Boundary crossings` renders every layer/actor transition from entry to visible exit, using text arrows, Mermaid, or another compact diagram when topology is consequential. Diagrams preserve known structure; they are not decoration or mandatory symmetry. - -`Readiness ratchet` names the prior throughline proof this mission consumes, the lateral contract obligations now load-bearing, which close here, which may become inherited work for the next visible product mission, and why. Every carried obligation names its next owner/re-entry gate and oracle. - -`Candidate evidence and oracles` binds every currently observable proof leaf to an exact test file/name, command, fixture, artifact inspection, human witness, or adjudication. If the oracle cannot yet be named, record `ORACLE GAP` and what must resolve it before the cluster can be cut or the leaf claimed. Do not invent a test name to make the draft look complete. - -`Verification approach` distinguishes inner mechanism evidence, middle integration/contract evidence where applicable, and outer deployed/user-visible evidence. Outer verification is owned explicitly whenever the product advance is visible; it may be deferred only to a named owner with a re-entry trigger. - -`Risks and assumptions` records each consequential assumption with impact if false and the cheapest discriminating validation. `Accepted constraints and guarded invariants` names what must survive and its existing or required guard; stop-the-line invariants are explicit. `Expected touched paths` is a tentative directory/file-level manifest using `+`, `~`, `-`, and `?`, useful for scope/overlap detection but revisable when the real path exposes a better boundary. - -In `docs/mission-drafts/README.md`, use a four-backtick outer fence when embedding this three-backtick template. - -## Mission 8 reconciliation - -Inspect `ln/fe-1569-brunch-agent-deployment` rather than assuming the old prospective Mission 8 cluster landed. - -Observed branch status: - -- application artifact and local verification exist for Docker image, fail-closed Postgres configuration, IAM/static-password paths, TLS, content-free OTel, liveness, dual architecture, and container/Postgres/collector smoke; -- the mission explicitly stopped at application-to-infrastructure handoff; -- no confirmed ECS service, RDS database/role, hosted collector, restricted ingress, AWS credentials, real IAM probe, restricted Anthropic turn, task replacement recovery, remote telemetry inspection, rollback, or owner acceptance exists; -- the branch archives Mission 4 and installs Mission 8 as live authority, which conflicts with this branch’s still-live and subsequently deepened Mission 4. - -For every old Mission 8 subsection, classify content as: - -```text -landed application contract -still-open infrastructure/release gate -superseded proposal with surviving branch evidence -``` - -Keep only successor-relevant actual contracts and open gates in `MISSION.next.md`. Do not copy the deployment branch’s mission-history transition into this branch or imply remote deployment. Do not create a Mission 8 draft. - -## Full-fidelity migration - -Before editing, inventory current `AGENTS.md`, `MISSION.next.md`, `MISSION.md`, and mission-archive headings. Map every major current `MISSION.next.md` section to exactly one destination: - -```text -retained/condensed in MISSION.next.md -moved to one named mission draft -retained as unallocated/later backlog in MISSION.next.md -removed only as duplicate/history with explicit surviving evidence source -Mission 8 content classified through actual branch evidence -``` - -Preserve, without duplicate planning homes: - -- universal elicitation teaching backlog and baseline-gated edits; -- SDCPN investigation obligations, typology decisions, adversarial probes, and return-to-elicitation conditions; -- workpiece hypotheses, observed strain, cold-reader oracle, and rejected mechanism re-entry conditions; -- capture/workpiece seam alternatives and measurements; -- Mission 3’s accepted workpiece/falsified construction split and provider-schema evidence; -- Gherkin Shape C, rejected alternatives, evidence ladder, and reversal conditions; -- Dafny pairing, claim ladders, trust boundaries, vacuity concerns, and reversal conditions; -- observer mechanics only as contingent re-entry evidence, not a planned implementation; -- host choice, session identity, compaction, voice, observability, simulated-conversation viewing, simulation-backed checking, and `HarnessAgent` concerns; -- structured-question semantics and required model → binding → transport → frontend → correlated reply → resumed-turn vertical proof; -- standing locks for AI SDK, stock assistant coexistence, binding ownership, Flue-native composition, and no TUI/generalized runtime. - -Do not rely on `/tmp` or an external transcript as the surviving repository record. - -## `AGENTS.md` changes - -Change only the mission-planning contract needed to permit and govern `docs/mission-drafts/` and preserve earned planning precision: - -- preserve the three laws and six-section live mission contract; -- state that the six sections are required semantic addresses, not a maximum detail/template budget; -- require known precision to remain explicit when it changes builder behavior, scope, proof, risk, or handoff, including compact trees and flow diagrams where they make topology legible; -- permit nested cold-start reads, boundary crossings, risks/assumptions, oracle-bound acceptance leaves, guarded invariants, layered verification, cross-cutting obligations, expected touched paths, and readiness-ratchet sections inside the six-section contract; -- require final live mission/side-quest proof leaves to name their oracle; allow a provisional draft to name an `ORACLE GAP`, which must resolve before the leaf can be claimed; -- distinguish throughline proof, readiness gate, and stratum closure, including explicit ownership/oracles for obligations carried into the next visible product mission; -- encode the recursive survey → working line → dependable base → next survey model, where terrain claims require real-boundary evidence and a provisional line is never silently treated as a hardened departure base; -- permit the compact future spine, provisional mission drafts, and one bounded side quest as the only additional planning/control surfaces; -- define the combined future planning record across `MISSION.next.md` and linked drafts; -- require one authoritative planning home per item plus concise spine links; -- prohibit draft implementation before conversion; -- define promotion as re-evaluation and conversion, not rename; -- return material not admitted to the live cut at full fidelity; -- remove a consumed draft; -- compare all affected planning files before and after; -- preserve one issue = one branch = one PR and one live mission. - -## Draft lifecycle - -`docs/mission-drafts/README.md` must establish: - -1. Draft files are context repositories, not authority. -2. Before promotion, re-read evidence/dependencies and inspect the deployed boundary and accepted scenario portfolio. -3. Convert—not blindly rename—the selected draft into the six-section `MISSION.md` contract. -4. Return material not admitted to the cut to `MISSION.next.md` or another draft at full fidelity. -5. Remove the consumed draft so no duplicate quasi-authority remains. -6. Archive the eventual accepted live mission under existing `docs/mission-archive/`. - -## Precision and cold-start standard for this side quest - -This side quest itself is builder-facing authority. Preserve the detailed topology, Mission 8 evidence, migration obligations, and accepted mission boundaries above; do not collapse them into a shorter generic template during implementation. - -### Cold-start reads - -A fresh builder must read completely before editing: - -- [`AGENTS.md`](AGENTS.md) -- [`MISSION.md`](MISSION.md) -- [`MISSION.next.md`](MISSION.next.md) -- [`docs/mission-archive/README.md`](docs/mission-archive/README.md) -- deployment branch `ln/fe-1569-brunch-agent-deployment`: its `MISSION.md`, `MISSION.next.md`, `docs/evidence/implementations/mission-8-deployment-handoff.md`, Mission 4 archive, and archive README -- commit `bee37b5e47351c92bde4811187da211736efc6d0` and the v3 composition comparison it records - -These are pointers, not invitations to copy their content wholesale. - -### Risks and assumptions - -- RISK: condensation silently drops rejected alternatives, re-entry conditions, or named mechanisms → MITIGATION: build a before/after migration ledger and require one destination or explicit surviving evidence source for every source section. -- RISK: draft files read as concurrent authority → MITIGATION: path naming, warning header, prohibited final sections, AGENTS rules, and negative verification checks. -- RISK: Mission 8’s local application artifact is represented as deployed infrastructure → MITIGATION: reconcile every deployment subsection against branch evidence and retain the stopped-at-handoff qualification. -- RISK: added template detail becomes mandatory empty ceremony → MITIGATION: include earned precision, omit unearned optional subsections, and prohibit symmetric filler. -- ASSUMPTION: four mission drafts plus a compact shared spine are sufficient disclosure boundaries → IMPACT IF FALSE: either shared contracts duplicate or one draft accumulates unrelated branches → VALIDATE: after migration, inspect each file for one coherent invocation/consumer and stop rather than adding another document type automatically. - -### Invariants preserved - -- `MISSION.md` remains byte-identical — guarded by: pre/post SHA-256 and `git diff --exit-code -- MISSION.md`. -- One live execution authority remains unmistakable — guarded by: exact warning/header review and grep for prohibited draft `Status`, final `Imperative`, and final `Proof` headings. -- Every consequential future-planning item survives in one home — guarded by: source-heading/migration ledger plus named-mechanism, rejected-alternative, re-entry, fog, constraint, stop, scenario, and evidence-source inventories. -- Mission 8 remains a stopped application/infra handoff rather than a remote deployment claim — guarded by: comparison against the deployment branch mission and handoff evidence. -- Existing archive paths remain valid — guarded by: relative-link validation and no rename/move in git diff. - -### Verification approach - -- Inner: structural checks — exact files, required/prohibited headings, `MISSION.md` hash, Markdown fences, and relative links. -- Middle: semantic migration audit — every old section and named obligation has one destination; no full mission contract is duplicated in the compact spine. -- Outer: cold-start builder review — an independent reader can identify sole authority, locate each future mission’s full context, state its visible advance and readiness ratchet, and distinguish Mission 8’s landed application artifact from its open infrastructure proof. - -### Cross-cutting obligations - -- Preserve the product-visible mission law and FE-1476-as-floor distinction. -- Preserve core semantic authority with packaged-B runtime topology. -- Preserve mechanical capture versus semantic workpiece versus absent observer boundaries. -- Preserve Mission 8 security, durability, telemetry, stock-assistant, and exposure gates as actually evidenced. - -### Expected touched paths - -```text -libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/ -├── AGENTS.md ~ -├── MISSION.md unchanged -├── MISSION.next.md ~ -├── SIDE_QUEST.md - at close -└── docs/ - ├── mission-drafts/ - │ ├── README.md + - │ ├── 5-capture-backed-review.md + - │ ├── 6-traceable-projection.md + - │ ├── 7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md + - │ └── 9-optimisation-handoff.md + - └── mission-archive/ unchanged -``` - -## Throughline - -```text -freeze current planning inventory -→ create mission-draft authority/lifecycle README -→ create detailed drafts 5, 6, 7, and deliberately shallow 9 -→ migrate old Mission 5–7 material into accepted new boundaries -→ reconcile old Mission 8 material against actual branch evidence -→ rebuild MISSION.next.md as compact spine/shared frame/backlog index -→ update AGENTS.md planning rules -→ compare every source section and named mechanism before/after -→ verify authority, links, formatting, and one surviving home per item -→ record side-quest outcome -→ remove SIDE_QUEST.md -``` - -## Proof - -Observe all of the following: - -1. `MISSION.md` remains byte-identical and is called the sole execution authority everywhere. -2. Exactly four draft files exist: Missions 5, 6, 7, and 9. No Mission 4 or Mission 8 draft exists. -3. Every draft begins with the non-authority warning and contains no `Status`, final `Imperative`, or final `Proof` section. -4. `MISSION.next.md` presents the accepted M4–M9 spine, FE-1476 floor, unenumerated broader portfolio, tracer/readiness law, shared obligations/locks, actual Mission 8 handoff status, draft links, unallocated backlog, and later concerns without duplicating full draft contracts. -5. Mission 5/6/7/9 drafts preserve all accepted product boundaries, tracer floors, readiness obligations, constraints, fog, and stop conditions. -6. Every major old `MISSION.next.md` section has one recorded destination; every removal identifies a surviving evidence source and current consequence/re-entry condition. -7. Universal/SDCPN teaching, workpiece/seam hypotheses, Gherkin, Dafny, observer re-entry, host, compaction, voice, observability, simulation, structured questions, standing locks, and Mission 3 evidence remain discoverable at full semantic fidelity. -8. Mission 8 text matches the actual branch: application artifact locally verified, infrastructure deployment/replacement proof open, mission-history conflict explicit. -9. `AGENTS.md` permits the new topology while preserving one live mission and the branch/issue/PR law. -10. Every draft includes cold-start pointers sufficient for a new builder to resolve the cluster, explicit boundary crossings, the readiness ratchet from inherited stratum closure through new proof to successor admission, risks/assumptions, candidate oracles or named oracle gaps, guarded invariants, layered verification, cross-cutting obligations, and a tentative touched-path manifest wherever corresponding precision is already earned. -11. Every final side-quest acceptance leaf is bound to a named command, file/assertion, artifact inspection, or cold-reader check; no leaf relies on an unnamed future test or vibes. -12. All relative links resolve; no repository planning file links to `/tmp`; Markdown fences and tables render; prose is not hard-wrapped; repository formatting/checks pass. -13. A before/after semantic audit compares headings, named mechanisms, rejected alternatives, re-entry conditions, constraints, fog, stop conditions, scenario classes, and evidence sources, with no unexplained loss. -14. The active side quest is removed only after the split and outcome are recorded. - -This proof establishes a coherent planning information hierarchy. It does not execute a future mission, close Mission 4, remotely deploy Brunch, or promote production prompt/skill/workpiece code. - -## Constraints - -- Budget: **USD 0.00**. No paid model, judge, grader, or external service call. -- Do not edit `MISSION.md`. -- Do not alter frozen Mission 3 evidence or v1–v3 Flue composition evidence. -- Do not implement Missions 5–9, source topology, prompts, skills, tools, capture, projection, revision, observer, deployment, or frontend behavior. -- Do not move `docs/mission-archive/`. -- Do not create documents beyond the ratified topology. -- Do not create a Mission 8 draft or represent its handoff as completed remote deployment. -- Do not create a second backlog or standing-lock document. -- Keep each planning meaning in one authoritative home; spine summaries and links are pointers, not duplicated contracts. -- Preserve unexpected worktree changes and modify only files owned by this side quest. -- Use targeted edits and literal-path staging; do not broadly add unrelated files. - -## Stop or reorient - -Stop and report the smallest blocker if: - -- any current planning item cannot be assigned one honest destination; -- the split requires editing live `MISSION.md` to remain coherent; -- Mission 8 branch evidence cannot distinguish landed application contract from open infrastructure work; -- condensation would erase a rejected alternative, re-entry condition, scenario class, or evidence consequence; -- a draft begins to read as executable authority; -- the broader scenario portfolio must be invented rather than honestly marked unenumerated; -- additional document types appear necessary; -- or concurrent changes touch the same planning files and ownership cannot be established. - -Do not solve a blocker by duplicating material or weakening the one-live-mission rule. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/5-capture-backed-review.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/5-capture-backed-review.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f72b3604ba0 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/5-capture-backed-review.md @@ -0,0 +1,279 @@ +# Draft Mission 5 — Capture-backed review of an honest prebuilt pair + +> Draft cluster only. Not execution authority. Do not implement until this cluster is re-evaluated and cut into `MISSION.md`. + +## Cold-start reads + +A fresh builder must resolve the current repository and the deployment handoff rather than treating this draft as a specification: + +- [`../../MISSION.md`](../../MISSION.md) — sole execution authority; consume the selected frozen Mission 4 workpiece, exact source Flue conversation, candidate instrument manifest, and comparative adjudication only after Mission 4 has actually produced and accepted them. +- [`../../MISSION.next.md`](../../MISSION.next.md) — compact future spine, FE-1476 product frame, shared proof obligations, standing locks, and any later evidence admitted after this draft was written. +- [`../mission-archive/2-mechanical-capture-sweep.md`](../mission-archive/2-mechanical-capture-sweep.md) — accepted mechanical capture throughline, exact close evidence, empty-payload boundary, conversation identity, and carried flags. +- [`../mission-archive/3-structurally-typed-runbook-to-headless-pn.md`](../mission-archive/3-structurally-typed-runbook-to-headless-pn.md) and [`../evidence/implementations/fe-1525-headless-runbook-pn.md`](../evidence/implementations/fe-1525-headless-runbook-pn.md) — accepted runbook/workpiece leg, falsified real-model construction leg, and the distinction between a hermetic non-empty fixture and vacuous empty-net parser success. +- [`../evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md`](../evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md) — frozen Mission 3 control and cold-reader evidence; do not substitute current source for its instrument revision. +- [`apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.test.ts`](../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.test.ts), [`apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts`](../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts), and [`apps/brunch-agent/src/capture/apply-sweep.ts`](../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/src/capture/apply-sweep.ts) — current production chat door and explicit harness-owned sweep. +- [`../../packages/core/src/evidence/capture-store.ts`](../../packages/core/src/evidence/capture-store.ts), [`../../packages/core/test/capture-store.test.ts`](../../packages/core/test/capture-store.test.ts), [`../../packages/binding-flue/src/local-capture-store.ts`](../../packages/binding-flue/src/local-capture-store.ts), and [`../../packages/binding-flue/test/local-capture-store.test.ts`](../../packages/binding-flue/test/local-capture-store.test.ts) — capture envelope, archived evidence, ownership, atomicity, parse, and local durability contracts. Their richer historical types are not permission to expose a typed capture ontology in this mission. +- [`apps/brunch-agent/src/http/petrinaut-chat.ts`](../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/src/http/petrinaut-chat.ts), [`apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/client-tools.ts`](../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/client-tools.ts), and [`../../../petrinaut/src/ui/views/Editor/panels/ai-assistant-panel.tsx`](../../../petrinaut/src/ui/views/Editor/panels/ai-assistant-panel.tsx) — AI SDK transport, Flue client-tool suspension/resume, and the existing `useChat` / `onToolCall` browser execution boundary. +- Deployment branch `ln/fe-1569-brunch-agent-deployment`, read with `git show`: its `MISSION.md`, `MISSION.next.md`, `libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/implementations/mission-8-deployment-handoff.md`, Mission 4 archive, and archive README. The branch proves a local application artifact and stops at the application-to-infrastructure handoff; it does not prove remote deployment. +- On that branch, inspect `apps/brunch-agent/src/db.ts`, `src/postgres.ts`, `src/database-config.ts`, `test/postgres.test.ts`, `test/database-config.test.ts`, and `test/container-smoke.integration.ts`. Mission 5 activates capture as product data and therefore must use a durable implementation at the claimed replacement boundary; task-local JSON is not an admissible deployed capture store. +- [`../../../petrinaut/docs/ai-assistant.md`](../../../petrinaut/docs/ai-assistant.md) and the other Petrinaut user-guide pages that mention the affected panel flow. Any user-visible change requires same-change documentation and a prompt to replace screenshots if they become stale. + +The selected workpiece, source conversation, prebuilt SDCPN, and derivation fixture do not yet have honest canonical paths. They are a Mission 4 exit join and Mission 5 preparation obligation, not names to invent here. + +## Visible product advance + +Through deployed Brunch, a reviewer types the visible name or id of a consequential element in a selected, honestly prebuilt SDCPN and receives: + +1. the current selected Markdown workpiece passage that supports the modelled meaning; +2. the prebuilder's explicit projection rationale, including consequential assumption, uncertainty, omission, default, or representational loss; and +3. exact mechanically retained excerpts from the source Flue conversation. + +The response visibly identifies both the workpiece and SDCPN as prebuilt. It makes no claim that Brunch automatically projected the net, inferred a complete provenance graph, or observed and consolidated the conversation in the background. A deliberately broken provenance link returns a visible unsupported/unavailable result rather than a plausible reconstructed explanation. + +This is FE-1476 beats 1–3 over one honest pair. The six-beat story is the integrated floor, not the product or demo ceiling; the broader scenario portfolio remains unenumerated and must be named when this draft is cut. + +## Contract stratum + +Close the **capture-backed provenance stratum for the selected prebuilt workpiece/SDCPN pair**. + +The accepted objects and minimum seam are: + +- one frozen current Markdown workpiece revision selected by Mission 4; +- one exact source Flue conversation and explicit settled range; +- immutable mechanical capture envelopes containing exact evidence and source pointers; +- stable references from consequential workpiece passages to capture evidence; +- one honestly prebuilt non-empty SDCPN with stable element ids; +- a minimal derivation fixture from consequential net elements to current workpiece passages, projection rationale, and relevant uncertainty/assumption/loss; and +- one reviewer-facing resolution operation from a typed visible element name/id to that chain. + +This stratum is narrower than automatic projection and broader than one green lookup. Every consequential element in the selected pair must have either resolvable provenance or an explicit unsupported/unlinked disposition before the visible pair can be trusted as capture-backed. The contract also covers duplicate, ambiguous, and stale identity; missing evidence; replay/idempotency; capture durability; cross-owner refusal; visible failure; and recovery at the replacement boundary the deployed product claims. + +Capture remains domain-opaque evidence. The foreground Markdown workpiece owns semantic synthesis. The derivation fixture records what the human or explicitly identified prebuilder decided. No capture payload becomes the canonical workpiece, assertion card, SDCPN proposal, or semantic intermediate representation. + +## Boundary crossings and current throughline hypothesis + +```text +Mission 4 selected source Flue conversation + → harness explicitly names the settled source range + → Mission 2 mechanical sweep reads Flue history + → durable capture store archives exact user evidence and immutable envelopes + → prepared Markdown workpiece references the relevant capture ids/spans + → identified prebuilder creates a non-empty SDCPN and minimal derivation fixture + → durable product state preserves workpiece, derivation, captures, and owner binding + → deployed Petrinaut reviewer sees the selected prebuilt net + → reviewer types a visible element name or id in the existing AI panel + → AI SDK transport sends the turn to the Brunch Flue ChatAgent + → provenance capability resolves element → derivation → current workpiece → capture archive + → client/server response returns exact excerpts plus attributed rationale + → panel renders an evidence-grounded why answer or visible unsupported/unavailable refusal +``` + +Actor and authority crossings: + +- **Flue conversation → Brunch harness:** history is the canonical conversation log; an explicit harness fact, never the interviewer model, schedules the sweep. +- **Harness → capture store:** only mechanical capture projection and evidence archiving occur. The store validates ownership, source pointers, idempotency, atomicity, and durable format. +- **Capture store → workpiece preparation:** a person or explicit preparation step writes narrow references. There is no automatic capture-to-workpiece reducer. +- **Workpiece → prebuilder:** the prebuilder interprets the selected Markdown meaning and records its rationale. The net is not represented as model-generated. +- **Brunch server → Petrinaut browser:** the Flue agent emits a client-tool request or uses another application-level host extension; the existing `useChat` / `onToolCall` path executes it. Petrinaut library code must not gain Brunch-specific business logic. +- **Element id/name → evidence:** deterministic stored links select the derivation and evidence. The model may explain linked material but may not invent links or substitute a transcript reread. +- **Application → deployment substrate:** active Flue and capture/workpiece/derivation state cross the actual Mission 8 persistence boundary. The application artifact exists on the deployment branch; infrastructure deployment and replacement proof remain open. + +## Throughline proof floor + +At the real deployed product boundary: + +1. one consequential visible element in the honestly prebuilt SDCPN resolves from its stable id or unambiguous visible name to the current workpiece passage, prebuilder projection rationale, exact source excerpts, and at least one relevant uncertainty, assumption, omission, default, or loss; and +2. one deliberately broken or stale link visibly returns unsupported/unavailable without fabricated rationale or evidence. + +This floor proves a real capture-backed why route for one element and its honest negative control. It does not close the selected pair's whole provenance stratum, prove automatic projection, establish an observer, type capture semantics, or enumerate the broader scenario portfolio. + +## Readiness ratchet + +```text +Mission 2 mechanical-capture throughline ++ Mission 3/4 accepted workpiece and selected frozen pair ++ Mission 8 landed application contract and still-open infrastructure handoff +→ inherited capture/workpiece/deployment closure required here +→ one deployed capture-backed why answer plus broken-link refusal +→ readiness gate +├─ close provenance breadth and durability for the selected prebuilt pair before Mission 5 ships +├─ admit the stable workpiece/derivation/element seam into Mission 6 automatic projection +└─ leave typed capture semantics, automatic observation, broad scenario coverage, and autonomous projection unearned +``` + +### Inherited stratum closure + +Mission 5 consumes, but must not overstate: + +- **Mission 2 throughline:** explicit settled Flue history ranges produce idempotent, source-linked envelopes with payload `{}` and no extraction model. Before use as product data, replay must preserve exact source evidence, owner refusal, format validity, and atomic all-or-nothing behavior. +- **Mission 3/4 workpiece throughline:** the selected workpiece must be cold-readable, epistemically honest, and frozen with the exact candidate instrument and conversation. If Mission 4 exits with a remaining workpiece gap, this mission must either close that named gap before preparing the pair or stop; it may not hide it in the derivation. +- **Prebuilt-pair honesty:** all net content used by the visible path must have an identified preparation route, stable ids, and explicit projection rationale. Parser validity alone and the Mission 3 empty paid document are ineligible. +- **Deployment application contract:** `ln/fe-1569-brunch-agent-deployment` has locally verified fail-closed Postgres Flue storage, TLS, image, health, content-free telemetry, and container smoke, but no remote infrastructure proof. Because this mission activates capture, its durable storage and replacement behavior become application and infrastructure obligations. The branch's inactive local JSON capture store is not inherited closure. +- **Product door:** panel → AI SDK → Flue `ChatAgent` and client-tool resume already work. The panel remains the real entrypoint and the stock assistant remains independent. + +If any inherited item is unavailable at cut time, name it as open inherited closure with an owner and oracle; do not call the throughline a dependable base. + +### Readiness gate after the new throughline + +Before Mission 5 can ship its selected-pair claim, assess every consequential element and close: + +- resolvable current provenance or an explicit unsupported/unlinked disposition; +- duplicate ids/names, ambiguous name lookup, stale workpiece revision, stale derivation, deleted/renamed element, missing capture, and mismatched owner; +- exact-evidence replay, sweep idempotency, capture/workpiece/derivation durability, atomic update/refusal, format/version refusal, and replacement recovery; +- cross-owner read/write refusal and absence of evidence leakage in errors, telemetry, or rendered answers; +- visible negative states for unsupported, unavailable, ambiguous, stale, and temporarily failed resolution; +- deterministic context source: stored current workpiece and derivation, never transcript fallback disguised as provenance; +- stock-assistant coexistence and a Brunch selection/routing posture sufficient for the selected deployed path; +- representative latency, model/tool usage, timeout, and failure behavior without reintroducing minute-scale foreground extraction/fold work; and +- compaction/stale-state risk: either cross a real compaction boundary and preserve the resolution chain, or state and visibly guard the accepted non-compaction limit. + +Mission 6 may inherit the stable seam only after these leaves are enumerable and accepted: current workpiece revision identity, workpiece passage/reference identity, exact capture evidence references, stable net element ids, and projection rationale/derivation identity. **Owner:** Mission 6. **Re-entry gate:** its first automatic projection must write the same seam and Mission 5's why operation must resolve a generated element without fixture-only translation. **Oracle:** Mission 6's deployed generated-element why proof plus repeated/changed projection identity checks. + +Do not carry selected-pair provenance breadth, capture durability, owner refusal, or broken-link visibility into Mission 6: Mission 5's visible claim already depends on them. + +## Candidate evidence and oracles + +| Claim leaf | Existing evidence or candidate oracle | +| --- | --- | +| Explicit harness-owned sweep over real Flue history; no interviewer sweep tool; exact excerpt, `{}` payload, idempotent retry | Existing `apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.test.ts`, test `the committed /api/chat door streams a plain Flue agent through server and client tools`, driven by `apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts`. Run `yarn workspace @apps/brunch-agent test:unit`. | +| Capture command closure, source evidence, all-or-nothing refusal, supersession/conflict guards, persisted parse | Existing `libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/capture-store.test.ts`, suite `capture-store contract`. Run `yarn workspace @hashintel/brunch-agent test:unit`. These tests are evidence for internal historical mechanics, not permission to expose typed payload semantics. | +| Owner refusal, tmp-and-rename persistence, serialization, invalid-format failure | Existing `libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/binding-flue/test/local-capture-store.test.ts`, suite `local capture store`. Run `yarn workspace @hashintel/brunch-agent-binding-flue test:unit`. This is local-file evidence only. | +| Panel executes client tools and resumes one turn through AI SDK | Existing `apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.test.ts` plus `libs/@hashintel/petrinaut/src/ui/views/Editor/panels/ai-assistant-panel.test.tsx`, test `adds one dynamic output and sends one automatic follow-up`. Run `yarn workspace @apps/brunch-agent test:unit` and `yarn workspace @hashintel/petrinaut test:unit --run`. | +| Mission 3 workpiece is recoverable and cold-readable; empty paid net is semantically false | Existing `docs/evidence/implementations/fe-1525-headless-runbook-pn.md` and `docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md`; artifact inspection is the oracle. | +| Mission 8 application contract is locally verified but remote replacement remains open | Deployment branch `docs/evidence/implementations/mission-8-deployment-handoff.md`: exact recorded commands include `yarn workspace @apps/brunch-agent lint:tsc`, `lint:eslint`, `test:unit`, `build`, `build:docker`, and `turbo run test:unit --filter='@hashintel/brunch-agent...'`, plus native arm64, explicit `linux/amd64`, and Docker/Postgres/collector smoke. The handoff explicitly is not remote proof. | +| Selected Mission 4 workpiece, exact conversation, manifest, and adjudication are accepted | **ORACLE GAP:** Mission 4 is still live in this branch. Resolve by naming its frozen candidate paths and owner acceptance/adjudication before this draft can be cut. | +| Every consequential element in the selected prebuilt pair has a derivation or explicit unsupported disposition | **ORACLE GAP:** no selected pair or inventory exists. Resolve with a frozen element inventory mechanically compared with the derivation fixture and human inspection of every unsupported disposition. | +| One typed name/id yields an evidence-grounded answer and broken link yields visible refusal in deployed panel | **ORACLE GAP:** no existing test or deployed witness exercises this operation. At cut time bind it to the exact production-path test and a human panel witness; do not count a server-only fixture. | +| Capture/workpiece/derivation survive the actual claimed replacement boundary | **ORACLE GAP:** deployment branch stopped before remote task replacement and left capture inactive. Resolve with one immutable image, selected durable store, process restart and cross-host replacement inspection against the same ids. | +| Cross-owner provenance refusal | Existing local capture-store owner refusal is inner evidence only. **ORACLE GAP:** bind an outer deployed second-principal probe to the selected identity/access boundary. | +| Stock assistant works with Brunch unavailable | **ORACLE GAP:** current standing lock is not an observed Mission 5 witness. Resolve with the exact host-mode test and browser witness selected at cut time. | +| Latency, usage, transcript fallback, and stale-state behavior are visible | **ORACLE GAP:** define thresholds only from a representative deployed run and owner acceptance; instrument the selected operation without content export. | + +## Verification approach + +- **Inner mechanism evidence:** run the existing core capture-store, binding local-store, and app sweep tests; add only tests required by the chosen narrow reference and durable-store representation. Mechanism checks must pin exact evidence, immutable captures, stable references, owner refusal, stale/ambiguous resolution, atomic failure, and format refusal. They do not establish the product claim. +- **Middle integration/contract evidence:** drive the production built Brunch application through AI SDK and Flue with the frozen pair, execute the actual provenance capability/client-tool boundary, and verify element → derivation → current workpiece → captures for positive and deliberately broken links. Exercise process restart and the selected durable implementation. Compare every consequential element to the frozen disposition inventory. +- **Outer deployed/user-visible evidence:** a human reviewer opens the selected prebuilt net through the deployed Petrinaut/Brunch boundary, types the visible element name/id, sees the attributed answer and prebuilt label, then exercises a broken link and a cross-owner attempt. Repeat after the claimed task replacement. Explicitly witness that stock mode still works. The mission owns this outer evidence; it may not defer it to Mission 6. +- **Semantic adjudication:** a cold reader checks that each answer distinguishes exact expert excerpts, current workpiece synthesis, and prebuilder rationale/assumption/loss. Plausible prose, source-path display, or link presence without semantic correspondence fails. + +## Inputs and joins + +- **Mission 4 exit join:** selected frozen Markdown workpiece, exact source Flue conversation/range, exact candidate instrument manifest, comparative evaluation/adjudication, and any smallest remaining workpiece gap. Join fails if these are merely branch-tip files without a frozen identity. +- **Mission 2 join:** explicit `applyCaptureSweep`-style harness operation, evidence archive, capture idempotency, owner key, and no interviewer scheduling. Reuse mechanics only after inspecting current contracts; do not revive generalized typed elicitation. +- **Prebuilt fixture join:** identified preparer, stable net element ids, current workpiece references, capture evidence references, projection rationale, and explicit unsupported dispositions. The pair must be non-empty and semantically inspectable. +- **Mission 8 join:** consume the landed application contract and the open infrastructure handoff accurately. Mission 5 must add durable capture/product-state scope before claiming replacement durability, then join to actual ECS/RDS/collector/ingress identity supplied by infrastructure. +- **Petrinaut host join:** use the existing generic panel tool-execution surface and canonical net identity. Any new UI or user behavior updates Petrinaut docs in the same change. +- **Mission 6 output join:** hand off the accepted seam and why operation so automatic projection can generate derivations that resolve without a fixture-specific adapter. + +## Risks and assumptions + +| Risk or assumption | Impact if false | Cheapest discriminating validation | +| --- | --- | --- | +| A selected Mission 4 workpiece can host stable passage/reference identity without becoming assertion cards | If false, links churn or a second semantic artifact is needed | Prepare references for the consequential prebuilt pair and revise a non-semantic line; observe whether meaning-bearing references remain unambiguous. Stop before choosing a new ontology. | +| Visible element name is unique enough for reviewer input, with id as escape hatch | If false, a name-only why request can resolve the wrong element | Inventory duplicate/renamed names and exercise an ambiguous query that must request/disclose the id rather than guess. | +| A minimal companion derivation fixture is sufficient for why review | If false, rationale or loss cannot be recovered without transcript reread | Cold-read one consequential and one unsupported element using only workpiece, derivation, and captures. | +| Exact excerpts plus workpiece context are enough for a useful why answer | If false, the UI may expose provenance yet fail the review task | Human reviewer judges whether the answer explains the modelling choice and its uncertainty, not merely lists ids or quotes. | +| The Mission 8 Postgres application boundary can durably host or coordinate activated capture/workpiece/derivation state | If false, task replacement breaks provenance or requires a different durable owner | Implement the least candidate behind existing storage boundaries and run process/cross-host replacement; do not infer from Flue-table durability. | +| The selected short path need not cross Flue compaction | If false, workpiece/evidence recovery may fail during the visible review | Measure the selected conversation against compaction behavior; if crossed, make compaction recovery part of this mission. If not, guard and disclose the limit. | +| A model can explain deterministic linked material without inventing provenance | If false, free-form generation can launder unsupported claims | Negative controls remove or stale one link and compare the answer; require structured unavailable state before explanatory prose. | +| One selected prebuilt pair makes the peer set enumerable | If false, stratum closure cannot be distinguished from one tracer | Freeze the pair and inventory all consequential elements before broadening. | + +## Accepted constraints and guarded invariants + +- **One authority:** this file remains non-executable until converted into `MISSION.md`. Guard: exact warning and absence of live mission headings. +- **Flue history is canonical conversation log; capture is not a second transcript.** Guard: sweep reads named Flue entries and stores exact spans/excerpts only. +- **Harness owns sweep scheduling.** The foreground model receives no sweep tool and no scheduling instruction. Guard: existing app throughline test's tool-name assertions plus production manifest inspection. +- **Capture envelopes are immutable, exact-evidence, and domain-opaque.** Guard: capture-store parse/idempotency tests and schema inspection; stop if SDCPN fields enter capture payload contracts. +- **Foreground Markdown workpiece owns semantic synthesis.** Guard: cold-reader inspection and absence of an automatic capture reducer. +- **Prebuilt means prebuilt.** Guard: visible product label and frozen preparation manifest. Stop the line if the pair is described as automatically projected. +- **No observer.** No token threshold, `useAgentFinish` scheduler, asynchronous model fold, assertion consolidation queue, or automatic background update enters this mission. Guard: dependency/tool/state inventory. +- **No typed capture ontology or assertion-card default.** No closed kinds, slots, subject/predicate/value, per-capture SDCPN hints, or typed completion algebra. Guard: public-schema review. +- **No automatic projection.** The net and derivation are fixtures/prepared artifacts; no workpiece-to-mutation engine is mounted. Guard: tool manifest and preparation record. +- **No transcript fallback.** A missing stored link returns unsupported/unavailable. Guard: broken-link negative control. +- **Durability matches the claim.** Task-local JSON cannot support replacement durability. Guard: restart and cross-host replacement with the same ids and owner binding; startup refuses incompatible/missing durable configuration. +- **Ownership fails closed.** Guard: existing local owner refusal plus deployed second-principal probe. +- **Petrinaut remains contract owner and stock assistant remains independent.** Guard: no Brunch-specific logic in the published Petrinaut core, host coexistence test, and stock-mode browser witness. +- **No content-bearing telemetry by default.** Guard: trace/log inspection for excerpts, prompts, tool payloads, credentials, and owner material. + +## Cross-cutting obligations + +- Workpiece sufficiency: a cold reader can reconstruct the relevant objective/process meaning and distinguish evidence, inference, assumption, unknown, conflict, omission, and construction-opened loss. +- Evidence provenance: exact conversation evidence remains attributable; normalized workpiece or model prose is never presented as quotation. +- Projection fidelity for this prebuilt pair: every consequential prebuilt region names the workpiece material and preparer's rationale; no automatic generation claim is made. +- Failure visibility: ambiguity, missing/stale links, owner mismatch, durable-store refusal, and unavailable Brunch visibly stop/degrade the operation without advancing or fabricating state. +- Interaction quality: the why operation remains in reviewer language and does not expose construction schemas or block on semantic extraction/fold work. +- Security/privacy: consume Mission 8's restricted-boundary posture, trusted identity decision, durable state, and content-free operational visibility as actually accepted at cut time. +- Host continuity: preserve `useChat` / `onToolCall`, separate histories, and stock-assistant availability. +- User docs: update affected Petrinaut docs with what the reviewer types, what appears, and failure behavior; prompt for screenshot replacement if the UI changes. +- Architecture docs: if a new Petrinaut/Brunch folder forms a real architectural unit, add the required local declaration and run the Petrinaut architecture-doc lint. + +## Expected touched paths + +Tentative only; re-evaluate after the real boundary survey. + +```text +libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/ +├── MISSION.md ~ cut-time authority only +├── docs/evidence/ + selected-pair/provenance adjudication +├── packages/core/src/evidence/ ~ only if narrow reference/durable contracts belong in core +├── packages/core/test/ ~ corresponding contract guards +├── packages/binding-flue/src/ ~ durable capture adapter only if this remains the honest binding +└── packages/binding-flue/test/ ~ ownership/recovery/refusal guards + +apps/brunch-agent/ +├── src/capture/ ~ explicit harness sweep and durable store composition +├── src/conversation/ ~ narrow provenance capability/client-tool signal if earned +├── src/agents/chat-agent/ ~ mount only the why capability, never automatic projection +├── src/http/ ~ selected deployed route/identity composition if required +└── test/ ~ production throughline and replacement integration + +libs/@hashintel/petrinaut-core/ ? generic host contract only if an existing neutral extension is insufficient +libs/@hashintel/petrinaut/src/ui/views/Editor/panels/ai-assistant-panel/ ~ generic visible why/failure presentation if required +libs/@hashintel/petrinaut/docs/ ~ affected user-facing guidance +deployment/infrastructure source outside this checkout ? actual durable restricted service resources and remote proof +``` + +Do not create a capture ontology package, observer package, projection engine, graph database, generalized provenance platform, second server, or TUI. + +## Fog-line + +- The exact selected Mission 4 workpiece and whether stable references can be embedded in Markdown without changing its accepted semantics. +- The exact source conversation/range and capture replay needed for the pair. +- The smallest honest derivation representation and whether it travels with the workpiece, net, or as a companion manifest. +- The consequential-element inventory and what counts as consequential for the selected pair. +- Whether visible names are unique, ids are discoverable, or the existing panel needs a generic element-reference affordance. +- The exact durable owner for capture, workpiece, and derivation data at the Mission 8 replacement boundary. Flue Postgres durability does not automatically include these objects. +- The deployed host selection and trusted identity/access boundary; deployment branch evidence stops before these exist. +- Whether the selected review crosses Flue compaction and, if so, how current workpiece and evidence references survive it. +- Representative latency/usage and the smallest non-content operational signals needed to diagnose why-resolution failure. +- The accepted broader scenario portfolio. Do not infer it from Vestera or from the one prebuilt pair. + +## Stop or reorient + +Stop and surface the smallest blocker if: + +- Mission 4 has not frozen the selected workpiece, source conversation, instrument manifest, and adjudication; +- a selected pair cannot be prepared without inventing unsupported operational meaning or hiding material workpiece gaps; +- product language or UI implies the prebuilt net was automatically projected; +- why resolution depends on rereading the transcript, model-generated plausible links, or source-path proximity rather than stored references; +- a missing/stale/broken link produces an answer instead of unsupported/unavailable; +- task-local JSON is retained while the product claims survival across task replacement; +- capture payloads acquire SDCPN types, assertion-card semantics, closed kinds/slots, mapping hints, or completion state; +- the foreground model gains a sweep tool, schedules capture, or ordinary turns wait for extraction/fold work; +- an observer, automatic projector, graph database, or one-artifact capture/workpiece merger appears to tidy the route; +- one green element is treated as closure without inventorying every consequential element in the selected pair; +- the published Petrinaut library gains Brunch-specific product logic or the stock assistant becomes dependent on Brunch; +- remote deployment, trusted identity, owner refusal, telemetry, or replacement recovery cannot be observed at the boundary being claimed; or +- the scenario portfolio must be invented rather than named honestly at cut time. + +## Carried evidence and rejected alternatives + +- Mission 2 established the least capture pipe: explicit harness range, one exact envelope per user utterance, payload `{}`, stable ids on replay, no model extraction, no sweep tool. It did not establish typed semantics, a workpiece join, or durable remote product data. +- Mission 3 accepted one Flue runbook/workpiece path and falsified real-model construction on the exercised provider-visible schema bridge. The hermetic non-empty callback fixture proves packaging and canonical validation; the paid empty net is not a candidate prebuilt pair. +- Mission 4 is expected to supply the selected workpiece and exact conversation. Its owner-led semantic choices remain upstream; this mission may not silently redesign them while adding references. +- Deployment branch `ln/fe-1569-brunch-agent-deployment` supplies a locally verified application contract and explicit handoff: fail-closed Postgres Flue state, IAM/static-password paths, TLS, image, health, content-free OTel, and container smoke landed; ECS/RDS/collector/ingress credentials, real IAM/provider turn, replacement recovery, rollback, and acceptance did not. Capture remained inactive and local JSON. That distinction is load-bearing. +- The full capture/workpiece A–D alternatives, shadow-join probe, measurements, and re-entry conditions live in [`MISSION.next.md`](../../MISSION.next.md#captureworkpiece-seam-history-and-rejected-mechanisms). **Mission 5 selects support links only for the prepared pair:** immutable evidence stays separate from editable Markdown synthesis and joins through stable references plus derivation. Complete independence loses only as a sufficient FE-1476 delivery posture; capture-fold and one-artifact shapes remain rejected here. +- Versioned assertion cards remain a possible future response only if the selected Markdown reference seam fails under observed revision strain. They are not the Mission 5 default. +- Typed capture payloads, per-capture loss categories, closed kind/slot catalogs, precision ladders, completion algebra, `firesWhen`, plugin/repertoire runtime, graph storage, and a target-document ontology remain rejected until a real consumer and failure require them. +- An asynchronous inferential observer remains absent. It may re-enter only under later foreground revision strain with its own evidence for ordering, failure, flush, prior-meaning preservation, and latency. +- Automatic projection belongs to Mission 6. Mission 5's prepared net and derivation make the provenance contract testable without pretending the provider-schema and repeated-projection risks are solved. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/6-traceable-projection.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/6-traceable-projection.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b00175bec9b --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/6-traceable-projection.md @@ -0,0 +1,317 @@ +# Draft Mission 6 — Automatic traceable projection of one meaningful region + +> Draft cluster only. Not execution authority. Do not implement until this cluster is re-evaluated and cut into `MISSION.md`. + +## Cold-start reads + +A fresh builder must resolve these authorities and evidence before choosing a mechanism: + +- [`../../MISSION.md`](../../MISSION.md) — sole execution authority. Mission 6 may be cut only after Mission 4 and Mission 5 have actually closed their accepted joins. +- [`../../MISSION.next.md`](../../MISSION.next.md) — compact future spine, FE-1476 floor, cross-mission obligations, standing locks, and current Mission 7 handoff. +- [`5-capture-backed-review.md`](5-capture-backed-review.md) — provisional predecessor contract. At cut time replace assumptions with Mission 5's accepted archive/evidence and exact current workpiece/derivation seam. +- [`../mission-archive/3-structurally-typed-runbook-to-headless-pn.md`](../mission-archive/3-structurally-typed-runbook-to-headless-pn.md) and [`../evidence/implementations/fe-1525-headless-runbook-pn.md`](../evidence/implementations/fe-1525-headless-runbook-pn.md) — accepted workpiece leg, canonical callback fixture, provider-visible nested-schema failure, vacuous empty-net result, and explicit next-boundary decision. +- [`apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/headless-petrinaut-client.ts`](../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/headless-petrinaut-client.ts), [`apps/brunch-agent/test/headless-petrinaut-client.test.ts`](../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/test/headless-petrinaut-client.test.ts), and [`../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/test/construction-tools.test.ts`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/test/construction-tools.test.ts) — current bounded six-tool callback route and its limits. +- [`../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts) and [`../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts) — the failed Valibot `looseObject({})` + `rawTransform` provider bridge, canonical runtime delegation, conditional construct-only mounting, and exact current tool subset. +- [`../../../petrinaut-core/src/ai.ts`](../../../petrinaut-core/src/ai.ts), [`../../../petrinaut-core/src/action-schemas.ts`](../../../petrinaut-core/src/action-schemas.ts), [`../../../petrinaut-core/src/schemas/entity-schemas.ts`](../../../petrinaut-core/src/schemas/entity-schemas.ts), and [`../../../petrinaut-core/src/ai.test.ts`](../../../petrinaut-core/src/ai.test.ts) — canonical Petrinaut AI schemas, mutation callbacks, ids, nested types, and JSON Schema evidence. These are the authority; Brunch prose or copied field catalogs are not. +- [`../../../petrinaut/src/ui/views/Editor/panels/ai-assistant-panel.tsx`](../../../petrinaut/src/ui/views/Editor/panels/ai-assistant-panel.tsx) and [`../../../petrinaut/src/ui/views/Editor/panels/ai-assistant-panel.test.tsx`](../../../petrinaut/src/ui/views/Editor/panels/ai-assistant-panel.test.tsx) — current `useChat` / `onToolCall`, canonical input parsing, mutation execution, diagnostics sequencing, dynamic interactive tools, and visible failure surface. +- [`apps/brunch-agent/src/http/petrinaut-chat.ts`](../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/src/http/petrinaut-chat.ts), [`apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/client-tools.ts`](../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/client-tools.ts), and [`apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.test.ts`](../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.test.ts) — real panel-to-Flue transport and browser callback resume. +- [`../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md), its construction/check resources, and the exact accepted Mission 4 candidate versions — target-formalism guidance and current workpiece contract. Do not treat historical branch-tip resources as the frozen Mission 4 instrument. +- Deployment branch `ln/fe-1569-brunch-agent-deployment`, read with `git show`: current `MISSION.md`, handoff evidence, application persistence/telemetry files, and open infrastructure gates. Mission 6 consumes the actual deployed contract inherited through Mission 5; it must not imply the branch achieved remote deployment. +- [`../../../petrinaut/docs/ai-assistant.md`](../../../petrinaut/docs/ai-assistant.md), [`../../../petrinaut/docs/drawing-a-net.md`](../../../petrinaut/docs/drawing-a-net.md), and affected simulation/formalism guidance. User-visible projection behavior must update the user guide and prompt screenshot replacement where applicable. + +The accepted bounded workpiece region, Mission 5 pair, derivation representation, generated-region semantics, and Mission 7 correction are not yet canonical paths. They must be named from accepted predecessor evidence when this draft is cut. + +## Visible product advance + +Through deployed Brunch, a person requests projection of one bounded, accepted region of the current evidence-backed Markdown workpiece and sees a non-empty, semantically meaningful live SDCPN region appear in Petrinaut. Consequential generated elements carry stable caller-supplied ids and derivations that make Mission 5's why operation resolve back to the current workpiece and its exact retained evidence. + +The region must be visually inspectable and operationally meaningful: it must exercise the canonical coloured type, parameter, place, transition, and arc contracts required by the selected process meaning. A toy place/transition pair, empty net, parser-only artifact, headless-only result, or one successful nested tool call is not the visible advance. Repeat, changed-input, and failure-class obligations harden this line at the readiness gate; they do not define whether the first line exists. + +The first in-mission tracer is narrower: repair the provider-visible nested schema path enough for one real model call to emit and apply a canonical nested input such as `addType.elements`. That tracer retires the Mission 3 blocker; it does not complete Mission 6. + +## Contract stratum + +Close the **automatic projection stratum for one named meaningful workpiece region and the canonical Petrinaut mutation classes it uses**. + +The bounded stratum includes: + +- current workpiece-region identity and revision; +- canonical Petrinaut coloured types and nested elements used by the region; +- canonical net-level parameters used by the region; +- places, transitions, input/output arcs, and any executable fields required by the selected semantics; +- stable caller-supplied ids and explicit treatment of additions, changes, unchanged elements, and removals if the selected changed-input case requires them; +- derivations from every consequential generated element to current workpiece material, evidence references, projection rationale, assumptions/defaults/omissions/losses, and projector identity/version; +- rejection, bounded repair, unsupported/default behavior, and visible partial failure; +- repeated projection and changed-input projection against current net state; +- semantic correspondence and visual inspectability in the real panel; and +- the exact predecessor provenance operation and durable state boundary. + +Stratum closure is over the named region, accepted scenario/peer set, and mutation classes actually used—not all Petrinaut tools, all SDCPN semantics, or the full optimisation handoff. Mission 9 owns broadening to its accepted full handoff scenario after Mission 7 proves bounded reviewer revision. + +Petrinaut owns canonical schemas and mutations. The projector may select and sequence them, but no Brunch schema copy becomes a parallel authority. The current Markdown workpiece is the semantic input. Captures remain evidence referenced by the workpiece; neither captures nor the full transcript are semantic projection IR. + +## Boundary crossings and current throughline hypothesis + +```text +accepted Mission 5 workpiece/prebuilt pair/provenance seam + → select one bounded current workpiece region and its expected operational meaning + → person requests projection in the deployed Petrinaut Brunch panel + → AI SDK transport dispatches to the Flue ChatAgent + → projector reads the current workpiece region, current net, and accepted derivation state + → Brunch/Flue exposes mechanically preserved provider-visible schemas from canonical Petrinaut Zod contracts + → real model emits canonical caller-supplied ids and nested mutation inputs + → Flue suspends on client tools + → Petrinaut panel parses inputs with canonical schemas and executes canonical callbacks + → client-tool results resume the same Flue turn + → panel visibly shows the meaningful generated region + → Mission 5 why operation resolves generated element → derivation → workpiece → captures +``` + +Authority and actor crossings: + +- **Workpiece → projector:** semantic interpretation occurs here and is recorded as rationale. The transcript is not primary input and captures are not folded into a semantic model. +- **Petrinaut Zod → provider schema:** schema exposure must preserve arrays, nested objects, refinements that can be represented, descriptions, and required/optional structure mechanically. Provider limitations and any lossy conversion are explicit. +- **Provider → Flue runtime:** provider arguments cross Flue's supported tool-schema interface. Runtime canonical validation remains decisive even when provider schema accepts an approximation. +- **Flue server → Petrinaut browser:** client-tool suspension/resume carries mutation requests/results through the existing AI SDK panel contract. +- **Petrinaut schema → mutation callback → live document:** canonical input parsing precedes canonical mutation. Callback success is not semantic success. +- **Generated element → Mission 5 provenance:** the predecessor why operation consumes the same stable seam. A fixture-specific translation fails the join. +- **Application → deployed substrate:** workpiece, derivation, Flue conversation, and current net identity must survive the accepted Mission 5/Mission 8 replacement boundary. + +## Throughline proof floor + +The smallest deployed end-to-end proof must observe all of the following: + +1. A person requests projection of one named bounded workpiece region through the real Petrinaut Brunch panel. +2. The resulting automatically projected live region is non-empty, visually inspectable, and semantically corresponds to the selected operational meaning through the required type, parameter, places, transitions, and arcs. +3. Every consequential generated element has a stable caller-supplied id and derivation to the current workpiece, evidence references, and projection rationale, including any assumption or loss. +4. Mission 5's why operation resolves at least one generated element through that derivation. + +This floor proves one automatic traceable meaningful region and the positive generated-element provenance link. It does not close repeat/change behavior, schema-class breadth, stale or partial states, repair exhaustion, derivation atomicity, visible failure, full-net generation, arbitrary revision, Mission 7 reviewer authority, an observer, simulation fidelity, or the Mission 9 optimisation package. Those first seven obligations belong to this mission's readiness gate and stratum closure, not to acknowledgment that the working line exists. + +## Readiness ratchet + +```text +Mission 5 deployed capture-backed why over a closed prebuilt-pair provenance stratum +→ inherited provenance/durability closure required by automatic generation +→ provider-visible nested-schema risk tracer +→ meaningful live bounded region with stable ids, derivations, and positive why +→ readiness gate +├─ close repeat/change, schema/mutation breadth, stale/partial state, repair, derivation, and failure obligations +├─ admit a stable current-region projection seam and selected correction into Mission 7 +└─ leave full handoff breadth, broad regeneration, observer consolidation, and optimisation unearned +``` + +### Inherited stratum closure + +Mission 6 requires accepted evidence, not draft promises, for: + +- one current Mission 5 workpiece revision and stable region/passage references; +- exact evidence references and a durable, owner-bound capture/workpiece/derivation boundary; +- a why operation that resolves prebuilt element → derivation → workpiece → captures and visibly refuses stale/broken/cross-owner paths; +- a selected non-empty prebuilt pair whose consequential elements have closed provenance dispositions; +- the real deployed panel/AI SDK/Flue/client-tool path and stock-assistant coexistence; +- the actual Mission 8/Mission 5 persistence, identity, telemetry, and replacement contract. + +If the predecessor seam cannot accept a generated derivation without fixture translation, or Mission 5 did not close durability and negative provenance behavior, Mission 6 must stop at inherited closure. Automatic projection cannot turn a provisional provenance route into a dependable base by using it. + +### Readiness gate after the new throughline + +For the named region, enumerate and close: + +- every canonical schema and mutation class used, including nested arrays/objects, optional/null fields, ids, descriptions, runtime-only refinements, and error messages; +- provider-schema rejection and repair budget, duplicate tool delivery, client-tool resume, timeout, abort, and partial sequence failure; +- unsupported consequential defaults and every assumption, inference, omission, or construction-opened loss; +- semantic correspondence of type elements, parameters, places, transitions, arc direction/type/weight, executable code where used, and canvas-visible structure; +- unchanged repeat, changed input, stale workpiece revision, stale current net, partial prior projection, and concurrent/user change behavior; +- stable ids for unchanged elements, deliberate ids for new elements, deletion/retirement behavior where exercised, and absence of unrelated churn; +- derivation completeness, atomicity relative to applied state, lineage/change account, stale-link refusal, and no successful derivation for rejected mutation; +- visible partial failure and recovery/retry without duplicate state; +- path isolation from the stock assistant and from unrelated net regions; +- latency, usage, transcript fallback, compaction/recovery, and deployed replacement behavior where the real path crosses them. + +Mission 7 may inherit: + +- one accepted bounded workpiece-region identity and current revision; +- one generated live net neighborhood with stable unrelated ids; +- one traceable projection operation and explicit impact boundary; +- one selected operational distinction whose correction has observable but bounded consequences; +- derivation lineage/change-account semantics that can represent retained, changed, added, retired, unsupported, and widened-impact dispositions. + +**Owner:** Mission 7. **Re-entry gate:** an explicitly authorized reviewer supplies new evidence in 3–5 focused turns, a foreground phase-boundary synthesis creates an inspectable revision, and the same projector applies a scoped patch or explicit refusal without unrelated churn. **Oracle:** Mission 7's deployed correction/qualification/contextual-coexistence/conflict matrix and stable-unrelated-id check. + +Do not defer provider-schema fidelity, repeated projection, changed-input identity, derivation atomicity, semantic correspondence, or visible partial failure to Mission 7: Mission 6's automatic projection claim already depends on them. + +## Candidate evidence and oracles + +| Claim leaf | Existing evidence or candidate oracle | +| --- | --- | +| Canonical callback path can build a non-empty parser-accepted type/parameter/place/transition/arc fixture | Existing `apps/brunch-agent/test/headless-petrinaut-client.test.ts`, test `constructs a parser-accepted document through the bounded callbacks`. Run `yarn workspace @apps/brunch-agent test:unit`. This is inner headless evidence only. | +| Current plugin exposes exactly the bounded six-tool subset and delegates runtime acceptance/rejection to canonical Zod | Existing `libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/test/construction-tools.test.ts`, tests `exposes exactly the bounded canonical subset`, `mechanically carries the canonical input contract`, and `delegates accepted and rejected inputs to Petrinaut's Zod schemas`. Run `yarn workspace @hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn test:unit`. | +| Petrinaut tool metadata aligns with canonical schemas; JSON Schema for representative tools is AI-friendly; callbacks validate before applying | Existing `libs/@hashintel/petrinaut-core/src/ai.test.ts`, suite `Petrinaut AI core exports`, including `tool metadata stays aligned with input schemas and has no execute`, `addArc exposes an AI-friendly object input schema`, and callback tests. Run `yarn workspace @hashintel/petrinaut-core test:unit --run`. | +| Real panel parses canonical mutation input and executes callbacks through `onToolCall` | Existing source in `libs/@hashintel/petrinaut/src/ui/views/Editor/panels/ai-assistant-panel.tsx`; current test covers dynamic follow-up, not automatic construction. **ORACLE GAP:** bind a panel integration test to the actual selected mutation sequence. | +| Real server/client suspension and resume work | Existing `apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.test.ts`, production-door test driven by `petrinaut-chat.integration.ts`. It currently mounts no construction tools on ordinary panel conversations; that negative assertion is a guard, not Mission 6 success. | +| Mission 3 provider-visible bridge failed specifically on nested `addType.elements`, 0-for-9, and empty parser success was vacuous | Existing `docs/evidence/implementations/fe-1525-headless-runbook-pn.md`; inspect the paid-run artifact named there. | +| Live provider accepts the mechanically preserved nested canonical schema | **ORACLE GAP:** no existing real-model call proves this. Resolve first with one budgeted tracer using the exact provider/model/schema artifact and retain raw tool call/rejection evidence. A successful call does not complete the mission. | +| Selected meaningful region exercises required type/parameter/place/transition/arc semantics | **ORACLE GAP:** region and scenario portfolio are not selected. Resolve with a frozen workpiece-region fixture, expected semantic account, canonical resulting definition, and human visual inspection. | +| Mission 5 why resolves generated elements through the same derivation seam | **ORACLE GAP:** Mission 5 is provisional and no generated derivation exists. Resolve through the real deployed why operation without fixture-specific conversion. | +| Unchanged repeat is idempotent and changed input yields bounded identity-preserving change | **ORACLE GAP:** no projection operation exists. Bind to exact current-net before/after definitions, mutation log, derivation diff, and stable-id assertions when implemented. | +| Rejection/repair and partial failure do not advance canonical or derivation state incorrectly | Canonical mutation rejection is locally evidenced by `headless-petrinaut-client.test.ts` and plugin schema tests. **ORACLE GAP:** sequence-level atomicity/partial-state policy and visible deployed recovery are unresolved. | +| Semantic correspondence exceeds parser acceptance | **ORACLE GAP:** establish a workpiece-specific human adjudication; optionally admit a simulation-backed check only if it discriminates the selected meaning cheaply. Parser `ok: true` is explicitly insufficient. | +| Mission 7-ready selected correction has bounded observable consequences | **ORACLE GAP:** choose the correction with the owner only after the generated region exists; record expected retained/changed ids and behavior before Mission 7 is cut. | +| Deployment durability/identity/telemetry survive projection | **ORACLE GAP:** consume Mission 5 accepted remote evidence. The Mission 8 branch handoff alone stopped before infrastructure/replacement proof. | + +## Verification approach + +- **Inner mechanism evidence:** verify mechanical schema derivation from canonical Petrinaut sources, provider-visible nested shape, canonical runtime rejection, stable id planning, deterministic derivation construction, and no derivation commit for rejected calls. Keep conversion tests structural and compare against canonical source schemas; do not bless copied snapshots as a second authority. +- **First tracer:** make one real provider call against the exact nested schema that failed in Mission 3. Record provider/model, generated schema, raw arguments, runtime result, repair count, latency, and cost. Stop on a crisp upstream blocker. Passing retires only the provider-schema risk. +- **Middle integration/contract evidence:** drive the built Brunch application through Flue client-tool suspension/resume into a real Petrinaut instance. Apply the complete meaningful region, inspect canonical state and derivations, run unchanged repeat, then changed-input projection and an invalid/unsupported case. Include stale revision/current-net and duplicate-delivery probes where the selected protocol permits them. +- **Outer deployed/user-visible evidence:** a human requests the bounded projection in the deployed panel, watches the meaningful region appear, inspects the region, asks why a generated element, repeats unchanged projection, changes the selected workpiece input, and observes bounded visible change or explicit refusal. Witness stock mode remains independent. Mission 6 owns this evidence. +- **Semantic adjudication:** compare current workpiece meaning and explicit expected consequences against the resulting SDCPN, not merely tool logs. Record assumptions/defaults/losses and any mismatch. A simulation-backed check may supplement but not replace this adjudication unless its discriminating contract is accepted. +- **Failure verification:** provider-schema error, canonical rejection, client callback failure, stale state, repair exhaustion, and partial sequence failure must be visible and must not produce false successful derivations. + +## Inputs and joins + +- **Mission 5 join:** accepted current workpiece, durable exact evidence references, stable workpiece/derivation/element seam, deployed why operation, selected prebuilt pair, negative provenance behavior, and owner/replacement guarantees. +- **Mission 3 failure join:** exact paid-run evidence for the failed Valibot open-object bridge and the canonical six-tool hermetic fixture. Repair only the provider-visible loss first; do not reinterpret empty parser success as partial semantic success. +- **Petrinaut canonical-contract join:** consume `petrinautAiTools`, `mutationActionInputSchemas`, entity schemas, and writable callbacks by import or mechanical generation. Mismatches between file-format and action schemas route upstream to Petrinaut. +- **Flue join:** use a documented supported schema/tool path. If Flue cannot preserve the canonical nested schema, produce a crisp upstream requirement instead of deepening an opaque carrier. +- **Host join:** preserve AI SDK `useChat` / `onToolCall` and client-tool result resumption. Mutation execution remains browser/Petrinaut-owned. +- **Scenario join:** owner selects one meaningful workpiece region, operational expected account, accepted peer cases, and one Mission 7 correction. A toy fixture cannot supply this join. +- **Mission 7 output join:** stable region identity/current revision, impact boundary, repeat/change semantics, derivation lineage, and selected correction with expected consequences. +- **Mission 9 horizon:** record omissions needed to broaden from this region to the later accepted optimisation handoff; do not implement that breadth here. + +## Risks and assumptions + +| Risk or assumption | Impact if false | Cheapest discriminating validation | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Flue can expose a mechanically preserved Petrinaut nested schema to the provider | If false, automatic projection is blocked upstream or requires a different supported schema bridge | First real `addType.elements` tracer using Standard Schema/supplied JSON Schema or the least mechanical shape-preserving path. | +| A Zod-to-provider conversion can preserve the load-bearing contract without copying fields | If false, provider acceptance and runtime semantics diverge | Compare generated nested JSON Schema and positive/negative samples directly against canonical Zod for every used tool class. | +| One bounded region can be both meaningful and small enough to close | If false, the mission either proves a toy or expands toward a full net | Select the region and expected operational account before implementation; reject candidates lacking type, parameter, flow, and an observable change. | +| Stable caller-supplied ids are enough for repeat/change locality | If false, generated ids churn or require a stronger identity ledger | Run unchanged repeat and one changed input against a frozen current net; inspect all ids and unrelated definitions. | +| The projector can consume bounded context rather than the full workpiece/transcript | If false, locality and later revision become unreliable | Project from the selected region plus explicitly named dependencies; withhold unrelated transcript and observe whether the result remains sufficient. | +| A desired-region recomputation followed by bounded mutations satisfies locality | If false, internal global reasoning may cause hidden dependence/churn | Compare accessed inputs, proposed diff, and applied mutations; owner decides whether applied locality is sufficient for the delivery contract. | +| Mission 5's derivation representation can describe generated and changed elements | If false, automatic generation needs a seam revision before implementation continues | Emit one add, retain, change, and unsupported disposition on paper/fixture and run Mission 5 why resolution. | +| Bounded repair can recover provider mistakes without loops or silent defaulting | If false, projection latency/failure becomes unsafe | Inject one recoverable and one unrecoverable canonical rejection; enforce and visibly exhaust the accepted budget. | +| The selected changed-input case prepares Mission 7 without pre-solving reviewer authority | If false, Mission 7 inherits an irrelevant region or this mission expands into revision | Choose only expected operational consequence here; leave who may revise and how foreground synthesis authorizes it to Mission 7. | +| Parser plus visual inspection is enough for this region | If false, semantically wrong dynamics may look plausible | Try the cheapest workpiece-specific simulation expectation; promote only if it catches a plausible wrong projection. | + +## Accepted constraints and guarded invariants + +- **Petrinaut owns canonical schemas and mutations.** Guard: imports/mechanical generation and structural alignment tests. Stop if field shapes are hand-copied into Brunch prose, Valibot, fixtures presented as authority, or a parallel schema package. +- **Provider repair is only the first risk tracer.** Guard: acknowledge the working line only after the meaningful-region and positive-why floor; mission acceptance then requires readiness closure for repeat, change, and failure classes. +- **Workpiece is semantic input.** Guard: projector input manifest names current workpiece revision/region; transcript and captures are excluded as primary semantic input. +- **Captures remain evidence, not projection IR.** Guard: derivations reference evidence through the workpiece; projector has no capture-to-model reducer. +- **Stable caller-supplied ids are load-bearing.** Guard: unchanged-repeat and changed-input before/after assertions. +- **Applied state and derivation agree.** Guard: derivations commit only after canonical mutation result/current-state confirmation; rejected calls cannot appear successful. +- **No unsupported consequential defaults.** Guard: expected semantic account and assumption/default/loss inspection; unsupported cases visibly stop or remain explicit. +- **Non-empty and semantically meaningful.** Guard: required canonical type/parameter/place/transition/arc inventory, panel witness, and workpiece-specific adjudication. Parser acceptance alone fails. +- **Bounded repair and bounded region.** Guard: named repair budget, selected region/dependencies, mutation/impact log, and stop on widening beyond the accepted boundary. +- **No unrelated churn.** Guard: stable unrelated-id and definition comparison for repeat/change. +- **No observer or automatic workpiece revision.** Mission 6 projects the current accepted workpiece; it does not consolidate conversation evidence or decide reviewer authority. Guard: no scheduler/fold queue and no canonical workpiece writes. +- **One agent, one mounted job skill, existing panel door.** Guard: composition/dependency inventory; no second server, TUI, workflow engine, or subagent topology. +- **Stock assistant remains independent.** Guard: path isolation and host witness. +- **Deployment claims match observed evidence.** Guard: consume accepted Mission 5 replacement proof; do not cite Mission 8's local image as remote deployment. +- **Visible failures do not advance canonical state silently.** Guard: injected rejection, stale state, partial sequence, and timeout/abort tests. +- **Paid provider evidence requires cut-time authorization and a stated budget.** Guard: no real-provider tracer runs from this draft; the eventual live mission records model, maximum calls, and spend ceiling before execution. + +## Cross-cutting obligations + +- Projection fidelity: the generated region comes from the current workpiece and every consequential decision has an attributable rationale. +- Evidence provenance: Mission 5 why reaches exact evidence without laundering model prose into quotation. +- Workpiece sufficiency: construction names a smallest gap instead of silently filling missing objective/process meaning. +- Petrinaut acceptance: canonical schema/mutation validity, non-empty state, diagnostics where executable code is used, visual inspection, and semantic correspondence are distinct leaves. +- Identity and derivation integrity: repeat/change preserve unrelated identities and explain all necessary impact widening. +- Failure visibility: provider schema, canonical rejection, unsupported meaning, stale state, client callback, and partial failure visibly stop/degrade. +- Interaction quality: projection and why occur through the real panel in operational language; construction schema vocabulary does not take over reviewer interaction. +- Deployment/privacy: stable owner-bound product state and content-free observability survive the accepted replacement boundary. +- User docs: document request, visible generated result, why flow, repeat/change behavior, and failure states; prompt replacement of stale screenshots. +- Mission 7 readiness: leave one meaningful selected correction and a trustworthy bounded projection seam, not a generic revision platform. +- Mission 9 horizon: retain omissions and breadth gaps needed for the eventual optimisation handoff. + +## Expected touched paths + +Tentative only; the first real schema tracer may expose an upstream boundary and shrink or redirect this manifest. + +```text +libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/ +├── MISSION.md ~ cut-time authority only +├── docs/evidence/ + provider tracer, semantic adjudication, deployed projection +├── packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts ~ provider-visible canonical schema path and bounded tools +├── packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts ~ mount projection capability only on the accepted product route +├── packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/ ~ construction/projection guidance only where observed strain requires +├── packages/plugin-sdcpn/test/construction-tools.test.ts ~ canonical alignment/provider shape guards +├── packages/core/ ? minimal derivation mechanics only if Mission 5 places them here +└── packages/binding-flue/ ? no change unless supported Flue schema translation belongs at this boundary + +apps/brunch-agent/ +├── src/agents/chat-agent/ ~ compose bounded projection capability +├── src/conversation/client-tools.ts ~ client-tool names/results as required +├── src/http/petrinaut-chat.ts ~ preserve production dispatch/resume +├── src/evaluations/runbook/headless-petrinaut-client.ts ~ evidence harness only, not product substitute +└── test/ ~ real provider tracer and production throughline + +libs/@hashintel/petrinaut-core/ +├── src/ai.ts ~ only upstream canonical export/generation repair +├── src/action-schemas.ts ~ only canonical contract correction discovered at source +└── src/*.test.ts ~ canonical and mutation guards + +libs/@hashintel/petrinaut/ +├── src/ui/views/Editor/panels/ai-assistant-panel.tsx ~ generic host execution/visible failure only if needed +├── src/ui/views/Editor/panels/ai-assistant-panel.test.tsx ~ real host integration +└── docs/ ~ affected user-facing guidance + +deployment/infrastructure source outside this checkout ? only if accepted product route exposes a missing deployed contract +``` + +Do not add a hand-copied Brunch schema catalog, graph database, generalized projection framework, automatic observer, capture fold, workflow engine, second agent/server, or full 46-tool stock-modeller surface. + +## Fog-line + +- Which Flue-supported schema interface can preserve canonical Zod nested shape: Standard Schema, supplied JSON Schema, a mechanical shape-preserving conversion, or an upstream Flue change. +- Which canonical refinements are provider-expressible and how runtime-only constraints are described without pretending the provider enforces them. +- The smallest operationally meaningful region and accepted peer cases; the broader demo portfolio remains unenumerated. +- Exact type elements, parameter, places, transitions, arcs, executable code, and extension requirements for that region. +- Whether the current Mission 5 Markdown reference seam supplies stable bounded region identity or needs the least additional revision marker. +- The smallest projector implementation and where its projection plan/derivation state belongs. +- Whether recomputing a desired bounded region internally while applying a local diff satisfies the owner, or genuinely local computation is required. +- How deletions/retirements are represented if the selected changed-input case removes meaning. +- Repair budget, provider error feedback, timeout, and partial-sequence policy. +- Concurrent user mutation and stale-current-net behavior during projection. +- The exact semantic oracle beyond workpiece-specific human adjudication; simulation remains optional until discriminating. +- The selected Mission 7 correction and what counts as a sufficiently local patch when connected semantics legitimately widen impact. +- Representative deployed latency/usage, compaction/recovery behavior, and any host selection needed for this path. + +## Stop or reorient + +Stop and surface evidence if: + +- Mission 5's accepted workpiece/provenance/durability seam is unavailable or generated derivations require a fixture-specific translation; +- canonical Petrinaut field shapes are manually copied into Brunch; +- Flue/provider cannot receive the required nested shape through a supported mechanical path; record the crisp upstream blocker rather than extending the opaque open-object carrier; +- one successful `addType.elements` call, empty net, toy pair, parser result, or hermetic fixture is presented as mission completion; +- the projector reads the full transcript as primary model or treats captures as semantic IR; +- construction silently invents an objective, process spine, resource fate, contention rule, timing/tail behavior, or consequential default absent from the workpiece; +- repeated unchanged projection duplicates elements, churns ids, or mutates unrelated state; +- changed input triggers unrelated regeneration without a visible impact boundary and explanation; +- rejected/failed tool calls acquire successful derivations or partial state is represented as complete; +- semantic correspondence cannot be distinguished from attractive canvas output; +- the bounded region expands toward a complete net or all Petrinaut tools without an accepted consumer; +- an observer, automatic evidence fold, reviewer-authority mechanism, or generic revision platform enters to prepare Mission 7; +- Brunch-specific logic enters Petrinaut's published library instead of a generic host/canonical contract; +- stock assistant behavior or separate history becomes dependent on Brunch; or +- deployment, owner binding, visible failure, or replacement durability is claimed without real-boundary evidence. + +## Carried evidence and rejected alternatives + +- Mission 3 proved canonical Petrinaut callbacks can construct a non-empty fixture through `getLatestNetDefinition`, `addType`, `addParameter`, `addPlace`, `addTransition`, and `addArc`. It also proved runtime rejection of a zero-weight arc and correction in the faux path. +- The paid Mission 3 model run falsified the provider-visible Valibot `looseObject({})` + `rawTransform` carrier: nine `addType.elements` arrays arrived as strings, all were correctly rejected, and the parser accepted only an empty legacy document. Preserve the 0-for-9 result; do not describe it as partial construction success. +- The next accepted move from that evidence was Flue support for Standard Schema/supplied JSON Schema or a mechanical shape-preserving conversion. Extending the open-object carrier or copying Petrinaut fields into Valibot remains rejected. +- Petrinaut's canonical Zod schemas, action schemas, AI tool bundle, and mutation callbacks are current authority. The file-format and action-schema families are aligned by source code and tests, not guaranteed by Brunch; discovered mismatch routes upstream. +- Mission 5 deliberately proves why over an honest prebuilt pair first. Mission 6 must replace the prebuilt projection step with bounded automatic generation while preserving the same provenance contract. +- A comprehensive requirements graph, process-domain ontology, universal subject/predicate/value model, closed kinds/slots, typed completion algebra, deterministic capture-to-model fold, and full regeneration engine remain rejected. They re-enter only under repeated observed inability of workpiece prose plus explicit derivations to support projection or readiness. +- Optional SDCPN mapping hints remain advisory and absent by default. They may re-enter only if projection repeatedly misses consequential structures and a hint demonstrably helps without biasing workpiece meaning; they never copy Petrinaut payload fields. +- Stable caller-supplied ids remain the current least identity hypothesis. A stronger identity ledger re-enters only if repeat/change projection demonstrates unavoidable churn or ambiguity. +- Full desired-net recomputation with bounded applied diff remains fog, not accepted architecture. Unrelated churn or hidden global dependence rejects it. +- Broad 46-tool parity with the stock modeller is rejected; close only the canonical mutation classes the meaningful region actually uses. +- An inferential observer remains absent. Mission 7's default revision mechanism is foreground phase-boundary synthesis; observer promotion requires separate evidence for ordering, flush, failure, prior-meaning preservation, and foreground latency. +- Mission 9 owns broadening to the accepted full optimisation handoff scenario. Mission 6 must not stop automatically after one tracer, but neither may it expand without the named region, peer set, and oracle. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d42ab128437 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md @@ -0,0 +1,239 @@ +# Draft Mission 7 — Bounded reviewer revision and scoped patch + +> Draft cluster only. Not execution authority. Do not implement until this cluster is re-evaluated and cut into `MISSION.md`. + +## Cold-start reads + +A fresh builder must read these sources before cutting or implementing this cluster: + +- [`MISSION.md`](../../MISSION.md) — sole execution authority and the current Mission 4 workpiece decisions. +- [`MISSION.next.md`](../../MISSION.next.md) — compact shared frame, standing locks, and current mission joins. +- [`README.md`](README.md) — durable draft authority, lifecycle, conversion, and oracle-gap rules. +- [`docs/mission-archive/2-mechanical-capture-sweep.md`](../mission-archive/2-mechanical-capture-sweep.md) — exact-evidence capture, idempotency, Flue-history authority, and model-free scheduling. +- [`docs/mission-archive/3-structurally-typed-runbook-to-headless-pn.md`](../mission-archive/3-structurally-typed-runbook-to-headless-pn.md) — accepted workpiece leg and falsified provider-schema construction leg. +- [`evaluations/oracles/ir-quality-ruler-v1.md`](../../evaluations/oracles/ir-quality-ruler-v1.md) and [`evaluations/protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1/cold-ir-reviewer.md`](../../evaluations/protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1/cold-ir-reviewer.md) — current conservation, grounding, conflict-collapse, and cold-reading criteria; neither is yet a successive-revision oracle. +- [`docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md`](../evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md) — healthy foreground-turn range, costly whole-workpiece synthesis, and observed correction handling. +- [`packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md`](../../packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md), [`packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md), and [`packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/ir-template.md`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/ir-template.md) — current foreground lifecycle and workpiece correction behavior. +- [`apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.test.ts`](../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.test.ts), [`apps/brunch-agent/test/headless-petrinaut-client.test.ts`](../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/test/headless-petrinaut-client.test.ts), and [`packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts) — current real door, bounded mutation subset, and its limits. +- [`5-capture-backed-review.md`](5-capture-backed-review.md) and [`6-traceable-projection.md`](6-traceable-projection.md) — provisional inherited artifacts, provenance seam, projection contract, and stable-identity obligations. Re-resolve these joins against accepted close evidence at cut time rather than assuming draft hypotheses landed. +- Deployment branch `ln/fe-1569-brunch-agent-deployment`, especially `libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/implementations/mission-8-deployment-handoff.md` — local application contract and the still-open infrastructure proof that any deployed durability claim must consume. + +## Visible product advance + +Through the deployed Petrinaut/Brunch boundary, a scenario-authorized reviewer selects one operational meaning, challenges or refines it in 3–5 focused turns, inspects the attributed prior and current meaning plus a semantic change account, and sees either: + +- a linked SDCPN-region patch with unrelated identities and behavior unchanged; +- an explicitly justified widening of the impact boundary; or +- a visible refusal because authority, evidence, consistency, staleness, or canonical validation does not permit the change. + +The updated why answer retains the original expert evidence, adds the reviewer evidence with attribution, and explains the disposition of prior meaning. Recency by itself never grants overwrite authority. + +The broader demonstration portfolio is not yet enumerated. The accepted floor here is the selected FE-1476 review/revise case plus the revision classes named below, not every operational process or every possible correction. + +## Contract stratum + +The named stratum is **bounded reviewer-authority, workpiece-revision, and linked-patch locality for one selected projected region**. + +Scenario-declared authority must name the reviewer, the selected workpiece meaning and linked net region, the kinds of change the reviewer may settle, and any required confirmation or owner boundary. Authority outside that declaration is absent, not inferred. + +The currently accepted peer classes are: + +1. **Correction** — the authorized reviewer establishes that prior canonical meaning was wrong; the prior revision and evidence remain retained while the new revision names supersession. +2. **Qualification** — new evidence narrows, conditions, or hedges prior meaning without erasing the supported core. +3. **Contextual coexistence** — both accounts remain valid under distinguishable conditions; the workpiece and projection preserve the split rather than selecting the newest. +4. **Unresolved conflict** — accounts disagree and authority/evidence does not resolve them; canonical state does not silently advance. +5. **Refusal / rejected or unsupported change** — the request exceeds declared authority, lacks evidence, targets stale state, or cannot pass impact or canonical validation. + +Stale-base revision and legitimate impact widening are cross-class failure/extent cases. Any additional class must be explicitly accepted when the live mission is cut. + +## Boundary crossings and current throughline hypothesis + +```text +scenario declares reviewer authority + selected region + base revisions +→ reviewer enters the deployed Petrinaut assistant panel +→ AI SDK /api/chat transport resumes the owning Flue conversation +→ foreground Brunch agent conducts 3–5 focused operational-language turns +→ Flue history retains the canonical conversation +→ harness-owned mechanical sweep durably captures the settled reviewer range +→ one bounded foreground phase-boundary synthesis reads: + prior workpiece revision + current derivation/region + newly captured evidence +→ synthesis classifies correction | qualification | coexistence | conflict | refusal +→ attributed next workpiece revision + semantic diff + impact declaration +→ authority, base-revision, evidence, and impact gates admit or refuse commit +→ SDCPN plugin applies the bounded patch through Petrinaut-owned canonical mutations +→ Petrinaut validates the current net and selected behavior +→ panel shows revised meaning, disposition, patch/refusal, and updated why answer +``` + +The foreground phase-boundary synthesis is the default. It is one explicit semantic operation after the focused review, not extraction/fold work on every turn. The patch consumes the committed current workpiece and current net; neither the transcript nor an observer queue is an unbounded fallback. + +## Throughline proof floor + +One scenario-declared, consequential operational distinction must cross the real deployed path and produce: + +- 3–5 focused reviewer turns in operational vocabulary; +- mechanically retained, attributed reviewer evidence; +- an inspectable prior/current workpiece pair and semantic diff; +- the correct class disposition; +- a bounded patch or explicit refusal; +- updated element → derivation → workpiece revision → original and reviewer evidence provenance; and +- unchanged ids and behavior outside the declared impact, except where a visible, justified widening is accepted. + +The default tracer should be a correction because it proves canonical change. It must be selected so a mistaken overwrite, qualification, coexistence, and conflict treatment would be observably different. One successful correction is only throughline proof; it does not close the class stratum. + +## Readiness ratchet + +### Inherited stratum closure + +This cluster may start only after the prior missions have supplied and accepted: + +- Mission 5's honest prebuilt pair, durable exact-evidence provenance, broken-link behavior, and element/workpiece/evidence identity seam; +- Mission 6's meaningful automatically projected live region, derivation coverage, canonical provider-visible mutation path, repeated-projection identity behavior, and explicit partial/unsupported failure; +- the current workpiece revision and exact source Flue conversation selected at the prior handoff; +- a deployment boundary that actually persists every state this path consumes across the replacement behavior it claims. + +Draft links are not evidence. If Mission 5 or 6 ships a different representation, Mission 7 must consume that actual contract or return here for re-cutting. + +### Readiness gate after the new throughline + +Before this visible capability ships, assess the whole accepted class set: correction, qualification, contextual coexistence, unresolved conflict, refusal/unsupported change, stale revision, and impact widening. + +For each, record: + +- declared authority and the reason canonical state may change or must not change; +- preservation, supersession, qualification, contextual split, conflict retention, or rejection of prior meaning; +- semantic diff quality and attributed evidence support; +- workpiece, derivation, and net-link churn; +- base-revision and stale-state behavior; +- patch scope, unrelated identity stability, and behavior preservation; +- latency, token/usage cost, foreground blocking, and visible failure; +- transcript fallback behavior; and +- compaction/recovery behavior if the exercised deployed path crosses those boundaries. + +These peer obligations close in Mission 7 because Mission 9 consumes a trustworthy final revision rather than becoming the first owner of reviewer-authority semantics. The next owner is Mission 9 only for the selected complete artifact and accepted optimisation handoff. Re-entry gate: Chris/Yannis' accepted consumer contract reveals another revision class or makes a currently deferred durability/identity property load-bearing. Oracle: the new class must be added to the revision oracle and exercised through the deployed panel before Mission 9 may rely on it. + +Breadth beyond the named classes and accepted scenario portfolio remains unearned. + +## Candidate evidence and oracles + +- `apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.test.ts`, test **“the committed /api/chat door streams a plain Flue agent through server and client tools”**, currently proves the production AI SDK/Flue door, client-tool correlation, history recovery, ownership refusal, exact capture excerpts, idempotent recapture, and absence of sweep/construction tools on the interviewer. It does not prove reviewer revision or deployed infrastructure. +- `apps/brunch-agent/test/headless-petrinaut-client.test.ts`, tests **“constructs a parser-accepted document through the bounded callbacks”** and **“refuses tools outside the side-quest subset”**, currently prove only the six-tool construct subset and parser acceptance. They are evidence for bounded capability/refusal, not a scoped update patch or semantic fidelity. +- `evaluations/oracles/ir-quality-ruler-v1.md` supplies stable `CONFLICT-COLLAPSE`, `CONS-MISS`, `CONS-DISTORT`, `INVENT`, `HARDEN`, `SCOPE`, and `GAP-MISCLASS` judgments. Its own scope excludes successive revision and PN construction, so it may seed but cannot settle the revision claim. +- `docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md` records one correction preserved in a workpiece and healthy ordinary-turn timing. It does not prove authorization, successive revision, or patch locality. +- Canonical action/schema/parser tests under `libs/@hashintel/petrinaut-core/src/actions.test.ts`, `src/file-format/parse-sdcpn-file.test.ts`, and `src/file-format/serialize-sdcpn.test.ts` are exact inner oracles for accepted payloads and round-trip document validity, not meaning or locality. +- **ORACLE GAP — successive semantic revision:** no current oracle compares prior workpiece + newly captured evidence against the next revision across all five classes. Before cut, freeze a reviewed fixture set and adjudication rubric that detects lost supported meaning, incorrect authority, unsupported strengthening, conflict collapse, and incorrect disposition. +- **ORACLE GAP — patch locality and behavior:** no current oracle proves that a semantic revision changes the intended linked region while preserving unrelated ids and behavior. Before cut, define the selected region, explicit allowed impact set, before/after id inventory, semantic expectations, and—where discriminating—a Petrinaut simulation comparison. +- **ORACLE GAP — outer path:** no current test or artifact witnesses the 3–5-turn scenario portfolio through a remotely deployed Petrinaut/Brunch path. Before claiming the visible advance, record a human witness against the accepted deployment, exact scenario/base revisions, transcript, workpiece diff, mutation trace, before/after net, and refusal output. +- **ORACLE GAP — durable capture join:** the deployment handoff explicitly leaves the JSON capture store inactive and non-durable. Before this path consumes capture remotely, Mission 5 or this cut must identify and test the durable implementation across the claimed task-replacement boundary. + +## Verification approach + +- **Inner mechanism:** deterministic tests for authority checks, base-revision refusal, exact evidence references, semantic-diff representation, class disposition, idempotent commit, impact calculation, and canonical mutation validation. Use the frozen class fixtures and revision oracle; parser success cannot substitute for semantic review. +- **Middle integration/contract:** drive the production `ChatAgent`/AI SDK path from the selected Mission 6 artifact, perform the mechanical settled-range capture and foreground synthesis, apply the patch through the actual browser client-tool callbacks, and compare persisted before/after workpiece, derivation, and net artifacts. Exercise a stale-base attempt and one explicit refusal. +- **Outer deployed/user-visible:** a named human witness performs each accepted peer class through the deployed panel, including the 3–5-turn correction tracer, and verifies visible attribution, semantic diff, changed region, stable unrelated ids/behavior, updated why answer, and comprehensible refusal/failure. The live mission owns this outer proof; it cannot be delegated to Mission 9. + +## Inputs and joins + +- Mission 4 exit: selected frozen workpiece, exact source Flue conversation, exact candidate instrument manifest, and comparative evaluation/adjudication. +- Mission 5: prebuilt workpiece/net pair, current workpiece revision and references, capture evidence references, net-element ids, projection rationale, durability disposition, and the why interaction. +- Mission 6: selected meaningful region, canonical mutation surface, derivation records, repeat-projection identity evidence, and accepted unsupported/partial behavior. +- Mission 8: consume the actual application contract—fail-closed Postgres Flue state, verified TLS, IAM/static-password paths, content-free OTel, restricted routes, liveness, singleton ownership policy—but do not imply it is deployed. The infrastructure handoff, real RDS/Anthropic/collector/replacement/rollback proof, and owner acceptance remain required before an outer deployed claim. +- Mission 9: receives only an accepted final workpiece/net/evidence/derivation revision package and the six-beat real-path evidence; its consumer contract may not weaken Mission 7's revision-integrity closure. + +## Risks and assumptions + +- **ASSUMPTION:** bounded foreground synthesis can incorporate 3–5 turns without losing prior meaning or blocking ordinary turns. **Impact if false:** the default revision mechanism is not trustworthy or usable. **Cheapest validation:** run the five frozen class fixtures against prior revision + exact captures and measure phase-boundary latency separately from foreground turns. +- **ASSUMPTION:** scenario-declared authority is sufficient for the selected review. **Impact if false:** a reviewer may make an unauthorized canonical change or every change may require another owner. **Cheapest validation:** have the scenario owner adjudicate one allowed correction and one cross-boundary refusal before implementation. +- **ASSUMPTION:** Mission 6's stable ids and derivation neighborhood are sufficient to calculate a bounded impact. **Impact if false:** local revision can cause unrelated churn or require broader context. **Cheapest validation:** dry-run the selected semantic change against the frozen Mission 6 before/after artifact and enumerate the minimal connected impact. +- **RISK:** semantic diff reports textual edits while hiding a changed operational claim. **Impact:** a reviewer cannot understand what changed. **Cheapest validation:** cold human comparison against the class fixture's expected preserved/changed meaning. +- **RISK:** compaction removes the recoverable workpiece or evidence needed by synthesis. **Impact:** stale or transcript-dependent revision. **Cheapest validation:** if the real path crosses compaction, reconstruct the same current revision and evidence references after that boundary; otherwise label the limitation and keep it outside the shipped durability claim. +- **RISK:** the capture store remains task-local JSON while the service claims replacement durability. **Impact:** reviewer evidence may disappear after acceptance. **Cheapest validation:** inspect the consumed Mission 5/Mission 8 storage contract before cut and refuse remote revision until capture durability is observed. + +## Accepted constraints and guarded invariants + +- **STOP-THE-LINE — bounded authority:** canonical state changes only under the scenario's declared reviewer authority. Guard: authority fixture plus allowed/refused outer witness. +- **STOP-THE-LINE — evidence retention:** original and reviewer evidence stay exact, attributed, immutable, and reachable; model prose is never presented as quotation. Guard: capture identity/excerpt assertions and provenance inspection. +- **STOP-THE-LINE — no recency overwrite:** prior supported meaning survives unless explicitly corrected, qualified, context-split, or retired under authority. Guard: successive-revision oracle across every accepted class. +- **STOP-THE-LINE — patch locality:** unrelated ids and behavior remain stable, and necessary expansion is declared before commit. Guard: before/after id inventory, accepted impact set, and semantic/simulation check where applicable. +- Flue history remains the canonical conversation log; the capture ledger is not a second transcript. +- Mechanical capture remains domain-opaque and harness-owned. The foreground Markdown workpiece owns semantic synthesis. +- The foreground model neither receives nor schedules a sweep tool. Ordinary turns do not block on extraction, fold, completion, or projection. +- Petrinaut owns canonical SDCPN schemas and mutations. Brunch imports or mechanically consumes them and does not copy field shapes. +- Brunch remains a second assistant; preserve stock-assistant operation and distinct histories. Keep the panel on AI SDK `useChat` / `onToolCall`. +- No comprehensive ontology, closed claim kinds, typed completion algebra, generic assertion fold, generalized runtime, TUI, second agent, or second server is earned. + +## Cross-cutting obligations + +- Workpiece sufficiency: a cold reader can understand both revisions and the disposition without transcript archaeology. +- Projection fidelity and evidence provenance: the patch follows the committed workpiece change, and every changed consequential element reaches projection rationale and both generations of evidence. +- Revision integrity and patch locality: class handling, semantic diff, retained meaning, stable ids, and explicit impact widening remain inspectable as separate claims. +- Petrinaut semantic acceptance: canonical validation, non-empty result, and selected behavior are checked; tool-call or parser success alone is insufficient. +- Interaction quality and visible failure: focused foreground turns remain in a healthy latency class, and authority conflict, staleness, unsupported change, schema failure, or locality failure cannot silently advance state. +- If Petrinaut user-visible behavior changes, update the relevant pages under `libs/@hashintel/petrinaut/docs/` in the same change and prompt the owner to replace any screenshots made stale. + +## Expected touched paths + +Tentative until the Mission 5/6 joins and live UI boundary are inspected: + +```text +libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/ +├── packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md ~ revision/authority conduct if needed +├── packages/core/src/evidence/ ? generic retained-evidence/revision mechanics only if earned +├── packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/ ~ foreground review and workpiece revision guidance +├── packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/ ~ canonical update/patch capability selected by Mission 6 +├── evaluations/oracles/ + successive-revision oracle +├── evaluations/protocols/ + frozen class fixtures/protocol +└── docs/evidence/evaluations/ + observed revision campaign/adjudication +apps/brunch-agent/ +├── src/agents/chat-agent/ ~ compose only accepted capabilities +├── src/capture/ ~ settled-range durable join, not semantic fold +├── src/conversation/ ? explicit phase-boundary operation if this is the earned home +├── src/http/ ? only if the existing real door needs generic transport support +└── test/ ~ production-path revision, refusal, persistence, and locality coverage +libs/@hashintel/petrinaut-core/ +├── src/action-schemas.ts ~ only if a canonical mutation gap is proven upstream +└── src/simulation/ ? only if selected behavior comparison is discriminating +libs/@hashintel/petrinaut/ +├── src/ui/views/Editor/panels/ai-assistant-panel* ? visible diff/impact/refusal surface if chat is insufficient +└── docs/ ~ when user-visible behavior changes +``` + +No path is permission to edit before the cluster is cut. Prefer existing generic host extension points over Brunch-specific Petrinaut library logic. + +## Fog-line + +- The exact accepted scenario portfolio beyond the selected correction tracer. +- The exact authority declaration and whether any class requires original-expert or owner confirmation. +- The semantic-diff representation that is understandable without imposing per-statement semantic typing. +- The smallest linked neighborhood sufficient for synthesis and impact analysis. +- What counts as unchanged behavior outside the region and when simulation is a useful discriminator. +- How legitimate impact widening is previewed, authorized, and either committed or refused. +- The exact durable storage/transaction boundary across captures, workpiece revision, derivation links, and net commit. +- Whether the short path crosses Flue compaction; if not, which limitation must remain visible in the handoff. +- Whether the chat answer alone makes prior/current meaning and patch impact inspectable or a generic linked detail surface is required. +- Exact latency and usage ceilings must come from the accepted scenario and deployment budget, not invention. + +## Stop or reorient + +- Stop if reviewer authority cannot be named per scenario or a tentative proposal can silently become canonical truth. +- Stop if a correction, qualification, coexistence, conflict, or refusal cannot preserve and explain prior meaning. +- Stop if phase-boundary synthesis blocks each ordinary turn, repeatedly loses supported meaning, reads stale state, is unrecoverable, or unavoidably depends on unbounded history. +- Stop if reviewer evidence is not durable before canonical workpiece or net state changes. +- Stop if the patch rereads the transcript as its primary model, mutates from an uncommitted workpiece, or silently rebuilds unrelated regions. +- Stop if unrelated ids or behavior churn without an explicit, authorized impact widening. +- Stop if canonical Petrinaut schemas must be copied into Brunch or parser/tool success is presented as semantic success. +- Stop if deployment is claimed from the local Mission 8 image evidence without the remote infrastructure proof. +- Stop if implementation grows an ontology, deterministic capture-to-workpiece reducer, typed fold, completion algebra, or generalized revision platform to handle the selected stratum. +- Stop and reassess observer re-entry only under the named strain below; do not add it by momentum. + +## Carried evidence and rejected alternatives + +- **Default retained:** one bounded foreground phase-boundary synthesis over the prior workpiece revision and newly mechanically captured reviewer evidence. Whole-workpiece synthesis already has a distinct, higher latency class than ordinary turns; measure it at the boundary rather than moving semantic work into every turn. +- **Observer/fold rejected by default:** no observer exists on the production path, and the current IR ruler has not tested successive observer revisions. The canonical promotion mechanics and extraction ladder live in [`MISSION.next.md`](../../MISSION.next.md#foreground-revision-and-observer-re-entry). Mission 7 is the decisive strain gate: re-entry is considered only after repeated consequential foreground blocking, loss of prior supported meaning, stale state, unrecoverability, or unavoidable unbounded-history dependence. An admitted observer still may not mutate the net, and its likely short-review barrier is a forced tail sweep/queue flush because the token threshold alone may never fire. +- **Recency overwrite rejected:** newer testimony may correct, qualify, coexist with, or conflict with earlier testimony. Time order alone is not authority. +- **Append-only journal rejected:** it preserves history but leaves excessive cold-reading and canonical-meaning burden; the observed workpiece intent is a maintained current account with retained revision history. +- **One artifact rejected:** immutable captures and editable semantic workpiece revisions have different lifecycles. +- **Deterministic typed fold rejected:** Condition 5's typed mapping plus in-loop model judgment caused minute-scale ordinary turns. Re-entry requires evidence that foreground synthesis cannot reliably preserve or classify meaning and that the narrower mechanism fixes the observed failure. +- **Full regeneration rejected as a visible patch claim:** an implementation may reconsider broader context internally only if the applied diff remains bounded and unrelated identities/behavior are proven stable; otherwise it must report widening or refuse. +- Mission 3 evidence establishes an accepted, cold-usable workpiece leg and one observed correction, but its construction leg failed 0-for-9 on nested provider-visible shape and produced a vacuous empty net. Mission 6 must retire that risk before this cluster treats patching as available. +- The v3 Flue composition comparison found packaged universal guidance more reliable for opening elicitation but exposed shared review routing as weak. Mission 4 owns the selected one-job-skill content repair; Mission 7 must consume its actual accepted review route rather than reopen topology by momentum. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/9-optimisation-handoff.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/9-optimisation-handoff.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..62ec40b5965 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/9-optimisation-handoff.md @@ -0,0 +1,179 @@ +# Draft Mission 9 — Accepted optimisation handoff + +> Draft cluster only. Not execution authority. Do not implement until this cluster is re-evaluated and cut into `MISSION.md`. + +## Cold-start reads + +A fresh builder must read these durable sources before deepening this cluster: + +- [`../../MISSION.md`](../../MISSION.md) — sole execution authority. +- [`../../MISSION.next.md`](../../MISSION.next.md) and [`README.md`](README.md) — shared frame, standing locks, draft authority, and lifecycle. +- [`7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md`](7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md) and the eventual accepted Mission 5–7 close evidence — inherited real-path artifacts and proof. Draft promises are not join evidence. +- [`../mission-archive/3-structurally-typed-runbook-to-headless-pn.md`](../mission-archive/3-structurally-typed-runbook-to-headless-pn.md) — accepted workpiece leg, falsified real-model construction, and the parser-valid-empty warning. +- [`../../../petrinaut-core/src/file-format/serialize-sdcpn.ts`](../../../petrinaut-core/src/file-format/serialize-sdcpn.ts), [`../../../petrinaut-core/src/optimization.ts`](../../../petrinaut-core/src/optimization.ts), and [`../../../petrinaut/docs/optimization.md`](../../../petrinaut/docs/optimization.md) — existing Petrinaut terrain to inspect with the consumers, not a preselected handoff boundary. +- Deployment branch `ln/fe-1569-brunch-agent-deployment`, especially `libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/implementations/mission-8-deployment-handoff.md` — locally verified application contract and explicit application-to-infrastructure stop. +- The written Chris/Yannis consumer contract and accepted fixture, once they exist. Their absence is the fog-line, not permission to infer topology from current source. + +## Visible product advance + +Mission 9 broadens the proven bounded projection/revision path only across the scenario Chris and Yannis accept for one optimisation question. That same traceable path produces one selected complete SDCPN and a visible/exportable package from which they can begin the agreed experiment. + +The known semantic artifact floor is: + +- revised workpiece; +- final selected SDCPN; +- capture-backed evidence and projection/revision derivation; +- selected scenario and parameters; +- assumptions; +- omissions; +- construction/projection losses; and +- unresolved limits. + +The package representation, export topology, execution contract, and returned result are unknown. This draft does not choose them. + +The six-beat FE-1476 rehearsal proves that the handoff came through the real deployed elicitation, review, revision, and scoped-patch path. Rehearsal is evidence, not the sole product outcome. + +## Contract stratum + +The provisional stratum is **one consumer-accepted handoff for one selected complete SDCPN and one agreed optimisation experiment**. + +Before this cluster can be cut, Chris and Yannis must accept: + +1. the input artifacts; +2. one concrete optimisation question; +3. the required scenario and parameter representation; +4. the execution boundary; +5. the expected returned result; and +6. the minimum credibility checks. + +Only that acceptance can define “complete,” “exportable,” “can begin,” the relevant peers, and the contract closure required here. Do not broaden from one experiment to a generic optimisation integration or universal package. + +Mission 9 owns the breadth needed to move from Mission 7's accepted bounded region to the selected complete model. “Complete” means complete for the one consumer-accepted question and scenario, not exhaustive of every workpiece fact or operational process. + +## Boundary crossings and current throughline hypothesis + +Only the evidence-backed prefix and consumer-visible outcome are currently earned: + +```text +accepted Mission 7 bounded projection/revision path +→ Chris and Yannis define “complete” for one optimisation question +→ broaden the proven traceable path only across that accepted scenario +→ selected complete SDCPN + revised workpiece + evidence/derivation +→ scenario/parameters + assumptions/omissions/losses/limits +→ ORACLE GAP: consumer-accepted handoff boundary +→ Chris and Yannis can begin one agreed experiment +``` + +Do not fill the oracle gap with Petrinaut's current manifest, host capability, UI, archive shape, service, notebook, or another plausible transport before the consumers accept one. + +## Throughline proof floor + +One selected complete SDCPN and the known semantic artifact floor: + +- are produced by broadening the witnessed projection/revision path across only the accepted scenario, rather than substituting a hand-curated final model; +- are handed to Chris and Yannis in the form they accepted; +- carry the accepted scenario and parameters with honest assumptions, omissions, losses, and limits; and +- let them begin the one agreed optimisation experiment at the accepted boundary. + +This proves one accepted handoff. It does not prove a generic export package, optimizer integration, result model, repeated-experiment protocol, public release, or broad scenario portfolio. + +## Readiness ratchet + +### Inherited stratum closure + +Mission 9 consumes rather than repairs: + +- Mission 5's durable capture-backed provenance and visible why behavior; +- Mission 6's meaningful automatic projection, stable identities/derivations, and closed projection stratum for the selected region; +- Mission 7's accepted reviewer-authority classes, retained evidence, semantic revision, scoped patch/refusal, and stable unrelated behavior; and +- an actual deployment threshold sufficient for the consumers to use the path, with each claimed identity, durability, telemetry, access, and recovery property observed rather than inferred from the local image. + +If inherited closure is missing, return the defect to its owning mission. Mission 9 must not script around it for rehearsal. + +### Readiness gate after the new throughline + +The lateral obligations are intentionally not enumerated beyond the six consumer decisions. Once the first accepted handoff works, enumerate only the package, transfer, execution, result, credibility, repeatability, access, or retention obligations that the actual boundary exposes. Close those required to trust and begin the selected experiment. Carry broader obligations only with a named successor, re-entry gate, and oracle. + +Until consumer acceptance, any more detailed readiness list would plan past the fog-line. + +## Candidate evidence and oracles + +- Existing Petrinaut serialization, scenario, optimization, and UI contracts are terrain to inspect with Chris and Yannis. Their tests establish only what the current product can represent or execute; they do not establish acceptance, package shape, or experiment credibility. +- Accepted Mission 5–7 artifacts must provide the exact conversation, bounded workpiece revisions, captures, derivations, mutation trace, revised region, revision disposition, and deployed witness from which Mission 9 broadens. Their eventual archive/evidence paths replace these draft joins. +- Deployment branch evidence proves a local application artifact only. Remote infrastructure, replacement, real provider/collector behavior, rollback, and acceptance remain open. +- **ORACLE GAP — consumer contract:** record Chris and Yannis' acceptance of all six decisions and one concrete fixture before this draft is cut. +- **ORACLE GAP — selected complete model:** the consumer question must expose what completeness and credibility mean for this SDCPN; name the exact human or executable oracle only after that question exists. +- **ORACLE GAP — outer handoff:** the accepted contract must name the witnessed action and observation that distinguish “can begin the experiment” from receipt of an unusable artifact. + +## Verification approach + +- **Before consumer acceptance:** inspect the existing terrain with Chris and Yannis, obtain the six decisions and one fixture, and stop. No package, execution, result, or UI implementation verification is earned. +- **At mission cut:** derive inner artifact checks, middle handoff/execution checks, and outer consumer witness from the accepted contract. Bind every final leaf to an exact command, fixture, artifact inspection, or named witness; do not inherit the generic possibilities in this draft as requirements. +- **Real-path provenance:** whatever boundary is accepted must demonstrate that Mission 9 broadened the proven Mission 5–7 path across the accepted scenario and that the handed-off artifacts were not hand-curated substitutes. + +## Inputs and joins + +- Mission 4: selected frozen workpiece, exact source Flue conversation, exact candidate instrument manifest, and comparative adjudication. +- Missions 5–7: accepted bounded workpiece/net/evidence/derivation chain, revision and patch-locality evidence, and the witnessed real path Mission 9 must broaden. +- Mission 8 actual contract: locally verified application artifact plus still-open infrastructure handoff; no remote deployment is assumed. +- Chris/Yannis: written acceptance of the six consumer decisions and one fixture. +- Petrinaut: current serialization, scenario, optimization, and host capabilities are inspected as existing terrain and used only where the consumer contract accepts them. + +## Risks and assumptions + +- **ASSUMPTION:** one selected complete SDCPN can support one useful agreed experiment. **Impact if false:** the mission's visible floor or scenario portfolio changes. **Cheapest validation:** obtain the concrete question and ask the consumers what minimum model meaning it requires. +- **RISK:** Mission 7's bounded result is mistaken for the complete selected model. **Impact:** required scenario breadth is skipped or silently hand-built at handoff. **Cheapest validation:** after consumer acceptance, inventory the accepted scenario against the bounded region and name only the missing projection/revision breadth Mission 9 must traverse. +- **RISK:** package design precedes consumer acceptance. **Impact:** speculative topology becomes accidental infrastructure. **Cheapest validation:** make the six decisions and fixture the hard re-entry gate. +- **RISK:** “complete” degrades into non-empty or parser-valid. **Impact:** the experiment may be meaningless. **Cheapest validation:** derive completeness and credibility from the accepted question before cutting the mission. +- **RISK:** rehearsal substitutes curated artifacts for the real path. **Impact:** it proves staging rather than the product. **Cheapest validation:** inspect stable artifact identities and derivations across the witnessed six beats. +- **RISK:** local Mission 8 evidence is mistaken for deployment. **Impact:** the outer handoff cannot honestly run. **Cheapest validation:** inspect the remote proof matrix and owner acceptance before scheduling the witness. + +## Accepted constraints and guarded invariants + +- **STOP-THE-LINE — consumer acceptance:** do not choose or implement package topology, export UI, execution/result contracts, or touched paths before the six decisions and fixture are accepted. +- **STOP-THE-LINE — real-path origin:** the handoff must contain outputs of the witnessed deployed review/revise path. +- **STOP-THE-LINE — earned broadening:** complete the accepted scenario by extending the proven traceable path; do not substitute a separately prepared full model. +- **STOP-THE-LINE — semantic credibility:** non-empty and parser-valid are not synonyms for complete or optimisation-ready. +- Preserve the known semantic artifact floor and honest assumptions, omissions, losses, and limits. +- Use Petrinaut's current contracts only where accepted; do not copy their shapes into Brunch or couple directly to an optimizer speculatively. +- Keep Brunch as a second assistant with separate stock behavior and histories. +- Do not represent Mission 8's local application evidence as remote deployment. +- Do not invent a generic export platform, graph database, ontology, regeneration engine, TUI, or generalized runtime. + +## Cross-cutting obligations + +- Workpiece sufficiency, projection fidelity, provenance, revision integrity, and patch locality remain inspectable without transcript archaeology. +- Canonical Petrinaut acceptance and consumer-specific credibility remain separate claims. +- Failures and unsupported limits remain visible at whatever boundary the consumers accept. +- Any user-facing Petrinaut change later requires same-change user documentation and a prompt to replace stale screenshots. + +## Fog-line + +- All six consumer decisions. +- What makes the selected SDCPN complete for the agreed question. +- Whether current Petrinaut serialization, scenario, optimization, or host contracts are accepted, revised, or irrelevant. +- Package representation, export/transfer interaction, access and retention. +- Execution boundary, expected result, result correlation, repeatability, and credibility checks. +- The deployment/access threshold required by the consumers. +- Exact owning repositories and touched paths. + +## Stop or reorient + +- Stop until Chris and Yannis accept the concrete consumer contract and fixture. +- Stop if work starts by selecting an export bundle, manifest, UI, execution API, result type, touched paths, access/retention contract, or verification topology from current source rather than consumer acceptance. +- Stop if rehearsal becomes the sole output or curated staging replaces real-path artifacts. +- Stop if Mission 7's bounded region is relabelled complete without consumer-defined breadth, or if missing breadth is filled outside the proven projection/revision path. +- Stop if the selected net is called complete because it is non-empty, renders, or parses. +- Stop if consumers must reconstruct intent, evidence, assumptions, or derivation from the original transcript. +- Stop if a defect in Missions 5–7 is scripted around rather than returned to its owner. +- Stop if current Petrinaut contracts are copied into Brunch or direct optimizer coupling is introduced speculatively. +- Stop if local application evidence is called deployment or the chosen handoff bypasses applicable identity, durability, telemetry, access, and recovery gates. + +## Carried evidence and rejected alternatives + +- The six FE-1476 beats remain the minimum integrated rehearsal and provenance witness, not the product ceiling. +- The broader scenario portfolio remains unenumerated; only the accepted experiment can name the relevant scenario and contract classes. +- The known semantic artifact floor is ratified and retained. Its package representation is not. +- Mission 9 owns broadening the bounded path to the consumer-defined complete scenario; this ownership does not select an export, UI, API, optimizer, execution, or repository topology. +- Existing Petrinaut serialization/optimization capabilities are terrain evidence, not a selected boundary. +- Invented export topology, execution/result contract, touched-path manifest, generic optimizer integration, rehearsal-only completion, transcript handoff, parser-only acceptance, every-fact completion, and remote-deployment assumption remain rejected until consumer acceptance supplies contrary evidence. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/README.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/README.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..6b6e023915d --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ +# Provisional mission drafts + +Files in this directory are detailed context repositories for possible future missions. They are not execution authority, do not create live missions, and must not be implemented. [`MISSION.md`](../../MISSION.md) is the sole execution authority; [`MISSION.next.md`](../../MISSION.next.md) is the compact future spine and links to drafts without duplicating their detailed contracts. + +Each planning item has one authoritative planning home across `MISSION.next.md` and these linked drafts. A spine summary is only a pointer. Keep accepted decisions, rejected alternatives and reasons, re-entry conditions, scenario classes, evidence, constraints, fog, stop conditions, risks, assumptions, and named mechanisms in one discoverable home at the precision needed by a cold-start builder. + +Every draft must begin with the non-authority warning shown in the template. A draft may preserve a visible product hypothesis, contract stratum, provisional throughline, tracer floor, readiness obligations, joins, constraints, fog, stop conditions, evidence, and rejected alternatives. It must not contain `Status`, a final `Imperative`, or a final `Proof`. It may mark an acceptance leaf `ORACLE GAP` only when it also states what must resolve the gap before the cluster can be cut or the leaf claimed. + +## Lifecycle + +1. Before promotion, re-read the draft's evidence and dependencies, inspect the real deployed boundary, and confirm the accepted scenario portfolio and contract stratum. +2. Convert the selected draft into the six-section live mission contract in `MISSION.md`; do not blindly rename or copy it. +3. Give the live mission final `Status`, `Imperative`, `Throughline`, oracle-bound `Proof`, `Constraints`, `Fog-line`, `Stop or reorient`, and `Deferred` sections. +4. Return every item not admitted to the cut to `MISSION.next.md` or another draft at full fidelity. +5. Remove the consumed draft so no duplicate quasi-authority remains, then compare every affected planning file before and after for one surviving home per item. +6. When the eventual live mission is accepted, archive it under [`docs/mission-archive/`](../mission-archive/) according to the existing [archive rules](../mission-archive/README.md). + +## Draft template + +Omit a section only when no earned content exists. Do not collapse known precision merely because a heading is optional, and do not add symmetric filler. + +````markdown +# Draft Mission N — Name + +> Draft cluster only. Not execution authority. Do not implement until this cluster is re-evaluated and cut into `MISSION.md`. + +## Cold-start reads + +## Visible product advance + +## Contract stratum + +## Boundary crossings and current throughline hypothesis + +## Throughline proof floor + +## Readiness ratchet + +### Inherited stratum closure + +### Readiness gate after the new throughline + +## Candidate evidence and oracles + +## Verification approach + +## Inputs and joins + +## Risks and assumptions + +## Accepted constraints and guarded invariants + +## Cross-cutting obligations + +## Expected touched paths + +## Fog-line + +## Stop or reorient + +## Carried evidence and rejected alternatives +```` + +`Cold-start reads` contains pointers to exact canonical paths or ids, not copied content, and must let a separate builder resolve the cluster without the originating conversation. `Boundary crossings` renders every consequential layer or actor transition from entry to visible exit. `Readiness ratchet` names the prior throughline proof consumed, inherited closure now load-bearing, obligations closed here, and obligations carried to a named next owner with a re-entry gate and oracle. + +`Candidate evidence and oracles` binds each currently observable proof leaf to an exact test file and name, command, fixture, artifact inspection, human witness, or adjudication. `Verification approach` distinguishes inner mechanism evidence, middle integration or contract evidence, and outer deployed or user-visible evidence, with explicit ownership for outer verification. + +`Risks and assumptions` records each consequential assumption, its impact if false, and the cheapest discriminating validation. `Accepted constraints and guarded invariants` names what must survive and its existing or required guard, with stop-the-line invariants explicit. `Expected touched paths` is a tentative directory/file-level manifest using `+`, `~`, `-`, and `?`; it supports scope and overlap detection but remains revisable when the real path exposes a better boundary. From d14b461251969324d08cc2c3212551324bc03d0b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 11:42:47 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 037/101] Restore Brunch planning decisions --- libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md | 18 ++++++++++++++++-- .../mission-drafts/5-capture-backed-review.md | 10 ++++++---- .../mission-drafts/6-traceable-projection.md | 2 +- .../7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md | 2 +- .../mission-drafts/9-optimisation-handoff.md | 4 ++-- 5 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md index f0a028b04bb..934ee61f2ce 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md @@ -125,11 +125,25 @@ Prompting and recognition remain Brunch-owned. The latest `petrinautAiPrompt` is HASH Graph, Temporal, Redis, HASH API, S3, Kratos, and Petrinaut Optimizer are not current Brunch runtime dependencies and must not be added for symmetry. `@flue/react` remains appropriate for Brunch's local debug UI, and `binding-flue` remains a package even if it is the sole binding. The current host switch is still `yarn dev` versus `yarn dev:brunch`; that fact does not settle the product picker. +#### Mission 4 architecture and interaction decisions + +A prompt carries mounted-lifetime invariants. A skill carries the procedures and judgment for a recognizable job. A tool contract carries the semantics and constraints of one executable operation. These are responsibility boundaries, not requirements for matching files or packages. + +Tools follow semantic capability authority even when a binding, transport, frontend, or other host layer implements part of the vertical execution path. Crossing ownership does not relocate the tool's meaning: core or plugin policy owns the operation it defines, while binding, transport, and frontend own faithful adaptation, carriage, rendering, reply capture, and execution at their respective boundaries. + +A plugin is a contribution bundle, not a symmetric inventory. It contributes only the prompts, skills, tools, and mounting seams earned by its recognizable jobs and executable capabilities. Plugin append prompts are optional, and skill cardinality is earned by distinct jobs and observed routing/context strain—not by package count, operation count, or a requirement that every plugin expose one skill per concern. + +Ampcode is the selected conceptual basis. Retain from Five-Register the domain-primary workpiece, single-authoritative-home locality, Flue-native experiments, and explicit distinctions among authored text, parser/schema acceptance, construction execution, semantic correspondence, and stronger behavioral evidence. Do not create a third synthesis. Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification may classify what elicitation guidance does; they do not define phases, skills, schemas, runtime machinery, or file topology. + +Structured-question contract and evidence semantics are core-owned. Bindings adapt the core operation to a substrate, transport carries the affordance and correlated reply, and the frontend renders and collects that reply. Each crossing owns its local fidelity and failure behavior without redefining the question, answer, cancellation, redirect, or evidence semantics. + +Mission 4's remaining v3 content repair must strengthen routing for review and workpiece revision, require exactly one focused question after required disclosure when human knowledge is needed, and prevent loading the workpiece template before the workpiece is first created or materially revised. These are content/routing corrections within the selected architecture, not grounds to reopen skill topology. + Mission 4 selected one mounted plugin job skill with core-authored universal elicitation packaged as a lazy resource. Frozen v3 showed independent core-skill activation at 0/3 versus packaged disclosure at 2/3 on the opening case, while both candidates correctly restrained universal disclosure on construct-only/resolvable-review cases. The sole revised review pair bypassed the shared job skill in both candidates, so the protocol verdict remained invalid/both weak rather than validating packaged B across jobs. Keep packaged B because A showed repeated topology-specific strain; do not run v4 by momentum. Independent skill identity re-enters only if a second real plugin or changed framework/model behavior proves reliable cross-skill activation or material duplication/context strain. Evidence remains in [`flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/comparison.md`](docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/comparison.md). ### Mission 8 consumed deployment contract -Mission 8 on `ln/fe-1569-brunch-agent-deployment` stopped at the explicit application-to-infrastructure handoff. The application artifact is locally verified but **no remote deploy or acceptance happened**. No confirmed Brunch ECR repository, ECS service/task family, RDS database/user/IAM grant, hosted collector, restricted ingress, deployment owner, AWS credentialed run, real IAM probe, restricted Anthropic turn, cross-host replacement recovery, remote telemetry inspection, rollback, or owner acceptance exists. +Mission 8 at commit `157730cc5a214dd9c543e8d95c7193a219c48aef` on `ln/fe-1569-brunch-agent-deployment` stopped at the explicit application-to-infrastructure handoff. The application artifact is locally verified but **no remote deploy or acceptance happened**. No confirmed Brunch ECR repository, ECS service/task family, RDS database/user/IAM grant, hosted collector, restricted ingress, deployment owner, AWS credentialed run, real IAM probe, restricted Anthropic turn, cross-host replacement recovery, remote telemetry inspection, rollback, or owner acceptance exists. FE-1441 remains the deployment/Postgres/rate-limit tracker, while FE-1423 retains the authentication, telemetry, state-versioning/backup, and restart-durability gates. FE-1439's browser-minted UUID demo posture does not discharge FE-1423: caller UUID, CORS, obscurity, and rate limiting are not authentication. Resolve that policy conflict before any restricted-to-public cut. @@ -165,7 +179,7 @@ Old Mission 8 reconciliation: | Operational visibility/health | Local application contract landed; hosted inspection still open | Local collector and liveness pass; remote normal/failure/cost correlation, privacy inspection, retention, dashboards, and alerts do not. | | Confidence, constraints, fog, stop lines | Reduced to the landed/open gates above | Never call an image or HTTP 200 deployed/durable, never weaken TLS or leak secrets, never infer active-active safety, and stop before unrestricted exposure or false recovery claims. | -Authoritative observed details are in the deployment branch's `docs/evidence/implementations/mission-8-deployment-handoff.md`. This branch imports the application contract and open gates only—not that branch's Mission 4 archive, Mission 8 live-status transition, or an implication of remote success. +Authoritative observed details are at `157730cc5a214dd9c543e8d95c7193a219c48aef:libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/implementations/mission-8-deployment-handoff.md` on `ln/fe-1569-brunch-agent-deployment`. This branch imports the application contract and open gates only—not that branch's Mission 4 archive, Mission 8 live-status transition, or an implication of remote success. ## Parallel and asynchronous proof tracks diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/5-capture-backed-review.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/5-capture-backed-review.md index f72b3604ba0..e43095f34c4 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/5-capture-backed-review.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/5-capture-backed-review.md @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ A fresh builder must resolve the current repository and the deployment handoff r - [`apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.test.ts`](../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.test.ts), [`apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts`](../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts), and [`apps/brunch-agent/src/capture/apply-sweep.ts`](../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/src/capture/apply-sweep.ts) — current production chat door and explicit harness-owned sweep. - [`../../packages/core/src/evidence/capture-store.ts`](../../packages/core/src/evidence/capture-store.ts), [`../../packages/core/test/capture-store.test.ts`](../../packages/core/test/capture-store.test.ts), [`../../packages/binding-flue/src/local-capture-store.ts`](../../packages/binding-flue/src/local-capture-store.ts), and [`../../packages/binding-flue/test/local-capture-store.test.ts`](../../packages/binding-flue/test/local-capture-store.test.ts) — capture envelope, archived evidence, ownership, atomicity, parse, and local durability contracts. Their richer historical types are not permission to expose a typed capture ontology in this mission. - [`apps/brunch-agent/src/http/petrinaut-chat.ts`](../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/src/http/petrinaut-chat.ts), [`apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/client-tools.ts`](../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/client-tools.ts), and [`../../../petrinaut/src/ui/views/Editor/panels/ai-assistant-panel.tsx`](../../../petrinaut/src/ui/views/Editor/panels/ai-assistant-panel.tsx) — AI SDK transport, Flue client-tool suspension/resume, and the existing `useChat` / `onToolCall` browser execution boundary. -- Deployment branch `ln/fe-1569-brunch-agent-deployment`, read with `git show`: its `MISSION.md`, `MISSION.next.md`, `libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/implementations/mission-8-deployment-handoff.md`, Mission 4 archive, and archive README. The branch proves a local application artifact and stops at the application-to-infrastructure handoff; it does not prove remote deployment. +- Commit `157730cc5a214dd9c543e8d95c7193a219c48aef` on deployment branch `ln/fe-1569-brunch-agent-deployment`, read with `git show`, especially `libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/implementations/mission-8-deployment-handoff.md`, plus its `MISSION.md`, `MISSION.next.md`, Mission 4 archive, and archive README. That commit proves a local application artifact and stops at the application-to-infrastructure handoff; it does not prove remote deployment. - On that branch, inspect `apps/brunch-agent/src/db.ts`, `src/postgres.ts`, `src/database-config.ts`, `test/postgres.test.ts`, `test/database-config.test.ts`, and `test/container-smoke.integration.ts`. Mission 5 activates capture as product data and therefore must use a durable implementation at the claimed replacement boundary; task-local JSON is not an admissible deployed capture store. - [`../../../petrinaut/docs/ai-assistant.md`](../../../petrinaut/docs/ai-assistant.md) and the other Petrinaut user-guide pages that mention the affected panel flow. Any user-visible change requires same-change documentation and a prompt to replace screenshots if they become stale. @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ The response visibly identifies both the workpiece and SDCPN as prebuilt. It mak This is FE-1476 beats 1–3 over one honest pair. The six-beat story is the integrated floor, not the product or demo ceiling; the broader scenario portfolio remains unenumerated and must be named when this draft is cut. +Typing a visible element name or id is the accepted first interaction. Click-to-chat and automatic canvas-selection context are deferred unless textual identification proves ambiguous or burdensome in observed review use. + ## Contract stratum Close the **capture-backed provenance stratum for the selected prebuilt workpiece/SDCPN pair**. @@ -108,7 +110,7 @@ Mission 5 consumes, but must not overstate: - **Mission 2 throughline:** explicit settled Flue history ranges produce idempotent, source-linked envelopes with payload `{}` and no extraction model. Before use as product data, replay must preserve exact source evidence, owner refusal, format validity, and atomic all-or-nothing behavior. - **Mission 3/4 workpiece throughline:** the selected workpiece must be cold-readable, epistemically honest, and frozen with the exact candidate instrument and conversation. If Mission 4 exits with a remaining workpiece gap, this mission must either close that named gap before preparing the pair or stop; it may not hide it in the derivation. - **Prebuilt-pair honesty:** all net content used by the visible path must have an identified preparation route, stable ids, and explicit projection rationale. Parser validity alone and the Mission 3 empty paid document are ineligible. -- **Deployment application contract:** `ln/fe-1569-brunch-agent-deployment` has locally verified fail-closed Postgres Flue storage, TLS, image, health, content-free telemetry, and container smoke, but no remote infrastructure proof. Because this mission activates capture, its durable storage and replacement behavior become application and infrastructure obligations. The branch's inactive local JSON capture store is not inherited closure. +- **Deployment application contract:** the pinned Mission 8 handoff has locally verified fail-closed Postgres Flue storage, TLS, image, health, content-free telemetry, and container smoke, but no remote infrastructure proof. Because this mission activates capture, its durable storage and replacement behavior become application and infrastructure obligations. Its inactive local JSON capture store is not inherited closure. - **Product door:** panel → AI SDK → Flue `ChatAgent` and client-tool resume already work. The panel remains the real entrypoint and the stock assistant remains independent. If any inherited item is unavailable at cut time, name it as open inherited closure with an owner and oracle; do not call the throughline a dependable base. @@ -140,7 +142,7 @@ Do not carry selected-pair provenance breadth, capture durability, owner refusal | Owner refusal, tmp-and-rename persistence, serialization, invalid-format failure | Existing `libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/binding-flue/test/local-capture-store.test.ts`, suite `local capture store`. Run `yarn workspace @hashintel/brunch-agent-binding-flue test:unit`. This is local-file evidence only. | | Panel executes client tools and resumes one turn through AI SDK | Existing `apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.test.ts` plus `libs/@hashintel/petrinaut/src/ui/views/Editor/panels/ai-assistant-panel.test.tsx`, test `adds one dynamic output and sends one automatic follow-up`. Run `yarn workspace @apps/brunch-agent test:unit` and `yarn workspace @hashintel/petrinaut test:unit --run`. | | Mission 3 workpiece is recoverable and cold-readable; empty paid net is semantically false | Existing `docs/evidence/implementations/fe-1525-headless-runbook-pn.md` and `docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md`; artifact inspection is the oracle. | -| Mission 8 application contract is locally verified but remote replacement remains open | Deployment branch `docs/evidence/implementations/mission-8-deployment-handoff.md`: exact recorded commands include `yarn workspace @apps/brunch-agent lint:tsc`, `lint:eslint`, `test:unit`, `build`, `build:docker`, and `turbo run test:unit --filter='@hashintel/brunch-agent...'`, plus native arm64, explicit `linux/amd64`, and Docker/Postgres/collector smoke. The handoff explicitly is not remote proof. | +| Mission 8 application contract is locally verified but remote replacement remains open | `157730cc5a214dd9c543e8d95c7193a219c48aef:libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/implementations/mission-8-deployment-handoff.md`: exact recorded commands include `yarn workspace @apps/brunch-agent lint:tsc`, `lint:eslint`, `test:unit`, `build`, `build:docker`, and `turbo run test:unit --filter='@hashintel/brunch-agent...'`, plus native arm64, explicit `linux/amd64`, and Docker/Postgres/collector smoke. The handoff explicitly is not remote proof. | | Selected Mission 4 workpiece, exact conversation, manifest, and adjudication are accepted | **ORACLE GAP:** Mission 4 is still live in this branch. Resolve by naming its frozen candidate paths and owner acceptance/adjudication before this draft can be cut. | | Every consequential element in the selected prebuilt pair has a derivation or explicit unsupported disposition | **ORACLE GAP:** no selected pair or inventory exists. Resolve with a frozen element inventory mechanically compared with the derivation fixture and human inspection of every unsupported disposition. | | One typed name/id yields an evidence-grounded answer and broken link yields visible refusal in deployed panel | **ORACLE GAP:** no existing test or deployed witness exercises this operation. At cut time bind it to the exact production-path test and a human panel witness; do not count a server-only fixture. | @@ -271,7 +273,7 @@ Stop and surface the smallest blocker if: - Mission 2 established the least capture pipe: explicit harness range, one exact envelope per user utterance, payload `{}`, stable ids on replay, no model extraction, no sweep tool. It did not establish typed semantics, a workpiece join, or durable remote product data. - Mission 3 accepted one Flue runbook/workpiece path and falsified real-model construction on the exercised provider-visible schema bridge. The hermetic non-empty callback fixture proves packaging and canonical validation; the paid empty net is not a candidate prebuilt pair. - Mission 4 is expected to supply the selected workpiece and exact conversation. Its owner-led semantic choices remain upstream; this mission may not silently redesign them while adding references. -- Deployment branch `ln/fe-1569-brunch-agent-deployment` supplies a locally verified application contract and explicit handoff: fail-closed Postgres Flue state, IAM/static-password paths, TLS, image, health, content-free OTel, and container smoke landed; ECS/RDS/collector/ingress credentials, real IAM/provider turn, replacement recovery, rollback, and acceptance did not. Capture remained inactive and local JSON. That distinction is load-bearing. +- The pinned Mission 8 handoff supplies a locally verified application contract and explicit handoff: fail-closed Postgres Flue state, IAM/static-password paths, TLS, image, health, content-free OTel, and container smoke landed; ECS/RDS/collector/ingress credentials, real IAM/provider turn, replacement recovery, rollback, and acceptance did not. Capture remained inactive and local JSON. That distinction is load-bearing. - The full capture/workpiece A–D alternatives, shadow-join probe, measurements, and re-entry conditions live in [`MISSION.next.md`](../../MISSION.next.md#captureworkpiece-seam-history-and-rejected-mechanisms). **Mission 5 selects support links only for the prepared pair:** immutable evidence stays separate from editable Markdown synthesis and joins through stable references plus derivation. Complete independence loses only as a sufficient FE-1476 delivery posture; capture-fold and one-artifact shapes remain rejected here. - Versioned assertion cards remain a possible future response only if the selected Markdown reference seam fails under observed revision strain. They are not the Mission 5 default. - Typed capture payloads, per-capture loss categories, closed kind/slot catalogs, precision ladders, completion algebra, `firesWhen`, plugin/repertoire runtime, graph storage, and a target-document ontology remain rejected until a real consumer and failure require them. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/6-traceable-projection.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/6-traceable-projection.md index b00175bec9b..7eddf5a8aa7 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/6-traceable-projection.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/6-traceable-projection.md @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ A fresh builder must resolve these authorities and evidence before choosing a me - [`../../../petrinaut/src/ui/views/Editor/panels/ai-assistant-panel.tsx`](../../../petrinaut/src/ui/views/Editor/panels/ai-assistant-panel.tsx) and [`../../../petrinaut/src/ui/views/Editor/panels/ai-assistant-panel.test.tsx`](../../../petrinaut/src/ui/views/Editor/panels/ai-assistant-panel.test.tsx) — current `useChat` / `onToolCall`, canonical input parsing, mutation execution, diagnostics sequencing, dynamic interactive tools, and visible failure surface. - [`apps/brunch-agent/src/http/petrinaut-chat.ts`](../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/src/http/petrinaut-chat.ts), [`apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/client-tools.ts`](../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/client-tools.ts), and [`apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.test.ts`](../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.test.ts) — real panel-to-Flue transport and browser callback resume. - [`../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md), its construction/check resources, and the exact accepted Mission 4 candidate versions — target-formalism guidance and current workpiece contract. Do not treat historical branch-tip resources as the frozen Mission 4 instrument. -- Deployment branch `ln/fe-1569-brunch-agent-deployment`, read with `git show`: current `MISSION.md`, handoff evidence, application persistence/telemetry files, and open infrastructure gates. Mission 6 consumes the actual deployed contract inherited through Mission 5; it must not imply the branch achieved remote deployment. +- Commit `157730cc5a214dd9c543e8d95c7193a219c48aef` on deployment branch `ln/fe-1569-brunch-agent-deployment`, read with `git show`, especially `libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/implementations/mission-8-deployment-handoff.md`, plus its `MISSION.md`, application persistence/telemetry files, and open infrastructure gates. Mission 6 consumes the actual deployed contract inherited through Mission 5; it must not imply the branch achieved remote deployment. - [`../../../petrinaut/docs/ai-assistant.md`](../../../petrinaut/docs/ai-assistant.md), [`../../../petrinaut/docs/drawing-a-net.md`](../../../petrinaut/docs/drawing-a-net.md), and affected simulation/formalism guidance. User-visible projection behavior must update the user guide and prompt screenshot replacement where applicable. The accepted bounded workpiece region, Mission 5 pair, derivation representation, generated-region semantics, and Mission 7 correction are not yet canonical paths. They must be named from accepted predecessor evidence when this draft is cut. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md index d42ab128437..f451d9b0100 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ A fresh builder must read these sources before cutting or implementing this clus - [`packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md`](../../packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md), [`packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md), and [`packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/ir-template.md`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/ir-template.md) — current foreground lifecycle and workpiece correction behavior. - [`apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.test.ts`](../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.test.ts), [`apps/brunch-agent/test/headless-petrinaut-client.test.ts`](../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/test/headless-petrinaut-client.test.ts), and [`packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts) — current real door, bounded mutation subset, and its limits. - [`5-capture-backed-review.md`](5-capture-backed-review.md) and [`6-traceable-projection.md`](6-traceable-projection.md) — provisional inherited artifacts, provenance seam, projection contract, and stable-identity obligations. Re-resolve these joins against accepted close evidence at cut time rather than assuming draft hypotheses landed. -- Deployment branch `ln/fe-1569-brunch-agent-deployment`, especially `libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/implementations/mission-8-deployment-handoff.md` — local application contract and the still-open infrastructure proof that any deployed durability claim must consume. +- Commit `157730cc5a214dd9c543e8d95c7193a219c48aef` on deployment branch `ln/fe-1569-brunch-agent-deployment`, especially `libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/implementations/mission-8-deployment-handoff.md` — local application contract and the still-open infrastructure proof that any deployed durability claim must consume. ## Visible product advance diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/9-optimisation-handoff.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/9-optimisation-handoff.md index 62ec40b5965..824cec5a18c 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/9-optimisation-handoff.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/9-optimisation-handoff.md @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ A fresh builder must read these durable sources before deepening this cluster: - [`7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md`](7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md) and the eventual accepted Mission 5–7 close evidence — inherited real-path artifacts and proof. Draft promises are not join evidence. - [`../mission-archive/3-structurally-typed-runbook-to-headless-pn.md`](../mission-archive/3-structurally-typed-runbook-to-headless-pn.md) — accepted workpiece leg, falsified real-model construction, and the parser-valid-empty warning. - [`../../../petrinaut-core/src/file-format/serialize-sdcpn.ts`](../../../petrinaut-core/src/file-format/serialize-sdcpn.ts), [`../../../petrinaut-core/src/optimization.ts`](../../../petrinaut-core/src/optimization.ts), and [`../../../petrinaut/docs/optimization.md`](../../../petrinaut/docs/optimization.md) — existing Petrinaut terrain to inspect with the consumers, not a preselected handoff boundary. -- Deployment branch `ln/fe-1569-brunch-agent-deployment`, especially `libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/implementations/mission-8-deployment-handoff.md` — locally verified application contract and explicit application-to-infrastructure stop. +- Commit `157730cc5a214dd9c543e8d95c7193a219c48aef` on deployment branch `ln/fe-1569-brunch-agent-deployment`, especially `libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/implementations/mission-8-deployment-handoff.md` — locally verified application contract and explicit application-to-infrastructure stop. - The written Chris/Yannis consumer contract and accepted fixture, once they exist. Their absence is the fog-line, not permission to infer topology from current source. ## Visible product advance @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ Until consumer acceptance, any more detailed readiness list would plan past the - Existing Petrinaut serialization, scenario, optimization, and UI contracts are terrain to inspect with Chris and Yannis. Their tests establish only what the current product can represent or execute; they do not establish acceptance, package shape, or experiment credibility. - Accepted Mission 5–7 artifacts must provide the exact conversation, bounded workpiece revisions, captures, derivations, mutation trace, revised region, revision disposition, and deployed witness from which Mission 9 broadens. Their eventual archive/evidence paths replace these draft joins. -- Deployment branch evidence proves a local application artifact only. Remote infrastructure, replacement, real provider/collector behavior, rollback, and acceptance remain open. +- The pinned Mission 8 handoff proves a local application artifact only. Remote infrastructure, replacement, real provider/collector behavior, rollback, and acceptance remain open. - **ORACLE GAP — consumer contract:** record Chris and Yannis' acceptance of all six decisions and one concrete fixture before this draft is cut. - **ORACLE GAP — selected complete model:** the consumer question must expose what completeness and credibility mean for this SDCPN; name the exact human or executable oracle only after that question exists. - **ORACLE GAP — outer handoff:** the accepted contract must name the witnessed action and observation that distinguish “can begin the experiment” from receipt of an unusable artifact. From a72cd6f8e1b0006cfa86f788ea32004cc566a910 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 11:44:08 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 038/101] Pin Brunch planning split proof --- libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md | 61 ++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md index 934ee61f2ce..5a67835a9b8 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md @@ -369,32 +369,59 @@ Material was removed only where the deployment branch's observed application art ## Planning-split close record -Outcome: **planning split completed on 2026-09-02 against fixed point `06ed66c083`.** That commit is the reproducible before-state containing the committed side-quest contract and the old `MISSION.next.md`. +Outcome: **planning split completed and remediated on 2026-09-02 from `06ed66c083` to `f7175531c767c87f880d7def5321b1564a62a1e7`.** These immutable commits are respectively the before-state containing the side-quest contract and the reviewed split result. -Semantic review identity and result: the 2026-09-02 orchestrating-agent consolidated review against `06ed66c083` accepted the architecture, topology, preservation work, Mission 8 account, and expeditionary posture, then required the five focused corrections now reflected here. The implementation-side cold reviews are contemporaneous supporting evidence, not a durable oracle: after correction they reported no remaining blocker, including Mission 9's consumer-defined full-model broadening and fog-line. The reproducible semantic review packet is `06ed66c083`'s `SIDE_QUEST.md` and `MISSION.next.md` versus current `AGENTS.md`, `MISSION.next.md`, and all five files under `docs/mission-drafts/`; the checklist is the migration ledger categories above plus authority, Mission 8 truth, line/readiness separation, Mission 9 broadening/fog, and draft lifecycle ownership. +Semantic review accepted the authority topology, full-fidelity migration, Mission 8 account, throughline/readiness separation, Mission 9 horizon, expeditionary posture, and draft lifecycle after restoring omitted Mission 4 decisions, pinning deployment evidence, and correcting the immutable proof boundary. The review packet is the before-state `SIDE_QUEST.md` and `MISSION.next.md` versus the result's `AGENTS.md`, `MISSION.next.md`, and `docs/mission-drafts/`; the checklist is the migration ledger above plus those named concerns. Reproducible commands, run from the repository root: ```shell ROOT="libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent" -git show 06ed66c083:"$ROOT/SIDE_QUEST.md" >/dev/null -git show 06ed66c083:"$ROOT/MISSION.next.md" >/dev/null -git diff --no-ext-diff 06ed66c083 -- "$ROOT/AGENTS.md" "$ROOT/MISSION.next.md" "$ROOT/docs/mission-drafts" -git status --short -- "$ROOT/docs/mission-drafts" +BEFORE=06ed66c083 +RESULT=f7175531c767c87f880d7def5321b1564a62a1e7 -actual=$(for draft in "$ROOT"/docs/mission-drafts/[0-9]-*.md; do basename "$draft"; done) +# The side-quest contract exists only in the before-state; protected authority/archive files are byte-identical. +git cat-file -e "$BEFORE:$ROOT/SIDE_QUEST.md" +! git cat-file -e "$RESULT:$ROOT/SIDE_QUEST.md" 2>/dev/null +git diff --exit-code "$BEFORE" "$RESULT" -- "$ROOT/MISSION.md" "$ROOT/docs/mission-archive/" + +# The immutable result has exactly the four numbered drafts, all warnings, and no live-authority headings. +actual=$(git ls-tree -r --name-only "$RESULT" -- "$ROOT/docs/mission-drafts/" | awk -F/ '$NF ~ /^[0-9]+-.*\.md$/ {print $NF}') expected=$'5-capture-backed-review.md\n6-traceable-projection.md\n7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md\n9-optimisation-handoff.md' test "$actual" = "$expected" -test "$(rg -l '^> Draft cluster only\. Not execution authority\. Do not implement until this cluster is re-evaluated and cut into `MISSION\.md`\.$' "$ROOT"/docs/mission-drafts/[0-9]-*.md | wc -l | tr -d ' ')" = 4 -test -z "$(rg -l '^## (Status|Imperative|Proof)$' "$ROOT"/docs/mission-drafts/[0-9]-*.md)" -python3 -c 'from pathlib import Path; from urllib.parse import unquote; import re; root=Path("libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent"); files=[root/"AGENTS.md",root/"MISSION.next.md",*(sorted((root/"docs/mission-drafts").glob("*.md")))]; links=[(f,t) for f in files for t in re.findall(r"(? Draft cluster only\. Not execution authority\. Do not implement until this cluster is re-evaluated and cut into `MISSION\.md`\.$' "$RESULT" -- ":(glob)$ROOT/docs/mission-drafts/[0-9]-*.md" | wc -l | tr -d ' ')" = 4 +! git grep -E '^## (Status|Imperative|Proof)$' "$RESULT" -- ":(glob)$ROOT/docs/mission-drafts/[0-9]-*.md" +git diff --check "$BEFORE" "$RESULT" + +# Relative links resolve inside the immutable result rather than the mutable working tree. +RESULT="$RESULT" python3 - <<'PY' +from pathlib import PurePosixPath +from urllib.parse import unquote +import os, re, subprocess + +result = os.environ["RESULT"] +root = PurePosixPath("libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent") +listed = subprocess.check_output(["git", "ls-tree", "-r", "--name-only", result, "--", str(root / "docs/mission-drafts")], text=True).splitlines() +files = [root / "AGENTS.md", root / "MISSION.next.md", *[PurePosixPath(path) for path in listed if path.endswith(".md")]] +broken = [] +checked = 0 +for file in files: + text = subprocess.check_output(["git", "show", f"{result}:{file}"], text=True) + for target in re.findall(r"(? Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 13:21:00 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 039/101] Freeze the Brunch Mission 4 candidate instrument Promote the owner-selected elicitation architecture and add integrity-checked campaign evidence so paid comparison cannot mutate the Mission 3 control. Co-authored-by: Cursor --- apps/brunch-agent/package.json | 1 + .../src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts | 6 +- .../src/evaluations/runbook/artifacts.ts | 116 ++- .../evaluations/runbook/campaign-integrity.ts | 127 +++ .../evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts | 50 +- .../runbook/prospective-runbook-v2-run.ts | 838 ++++++++++++++++++ .../architecture/boundaries.integration.ts | 2 + apps/brunch-agent/test/build-artifact.test.ts | 11 +- .../candidate-process-model-workpiece.md | 87 ++ .../test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts | 5 +- apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.test.ts | 2 +- .../test/prospective-runbook-v2.test.ts | 545 ++++++++++++ .../test/runbook-artifacts.test.ts | 72 ++ .../test/runbook-elicitation-faux-expert.ts | 39 +- .../test/runbook-elicitation-faux-provider.ts | 95 +- .../test/runbook-elicitation.test.ts | 83 +- .../test/runbook-headless.integration.ts | 36 +- .../test/runbook-headless.test.ts | 12 +- .../test/skill-routing.integration.ts | 210 +++++ apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-routing.test.ts | 44 + libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md | 143 ++- .../exact-candidate-walkthrough.md | 27 + .../prospective-runbook-v2/protocol.md | 105 +++ .../brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md | 106 +-- .../packages/core/src/agent/index.ts | 4 + .../core/src/universal-elicitation.md | 214 +++++ .../packages/plugin-sdcpn/package.json | 3 +- .../plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md | 237 +---- .../packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts | 18 +- .../plugin-sdcpn/src/raw-imports.d.ts | 7 +- .../src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md | 33 - .../src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md | 132 ++- .../src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/elicitation.md | 204 ----- .../skills/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md | 71 ++ .../src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/ir-template.md | 75 -- .../skills/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md | 144 +-- .../src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md | 222 +++++ .../src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts | 26 + .../sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md | 106 +++ .../test/sdcpn-modelling-skill.test.ts | 51 +- 40 files changed, 3381 insertions(+), 928 deletions(-) create mode 100644 apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/campaign-integrity.ts create mode 100644 apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v2-run.ts create mode 100644 apps/brunch-agent/test/fixtures/candidate-process-model-workpiece.md create mode 100644 apps/brunch-agent/test/prospective-runbook-v2.test.ts create mode 100644 apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-routing.integration.ts create mode 100644 apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-routing.test.ts create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-candidate-v2/exact-candidate-walkthrough.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v2/protocol.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/universal-elicitation.md delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/elicitation.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/ir-template.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/package.json b/apps/brunch-agent/package.json index 9c9dca5a516..0c1d9394b9d 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/package.json +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/package.json @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ "lint:tsc": "tsgo --noEmit", "petrinaut:dev": "vite dev --config petrinaut-local.vite.config.ts", "runbook:elicit": "vite build && node --experimental-strip-types src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts", + "runbook:elicit:candidate-v2": "vite build && node --experimental-strip-types src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v2-run.ts", "runbook:headless": "vite build && node --experimental-strip-types src/evaluations/runbook/construction-run.ts", "test:unit": "vitest run --config vitest.config.ts", "transcript": "node --experimental-strip-types src/diagnostics/transcript-cli.ts" diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts index 4620752c905..55024c8b1c9 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts @@ -10,10 +10,10 @@ import { useInstruction, useTool } from "@flue/runtime"; import { + SDCPN_MODELLING_SKILL_NAME, sdcpnInitialDataSchema, useSdcpnPlugin, } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn/flue"; -import sdcpnModellingSkill from "@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md"; import { useBrunchAgent } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent/flue"; import { ping } from "./tools/ping.ts"; @@ -21,13 +21,13 @@ import { ping } from "./tools/ping.ts"; export const CHAT_MODEL_ID = process.env["BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL"] || "claude-haiku-4-5"; -export const RUNBOOK_SKILL_NAME = sdcpnModellingSkill.name; +export const RUNBOOK_SKILL_NAME = SDCPN_MODELLING_SKILL_NAME; export const ACTIVATE_SKILL_TOOL_NAME = "activate_skill"; export function ChatAgent() { const coreSystemPrompt = useBrunchAgent(`anthropic/${CHAT_MODEL_ID}`); - useSdcpnPlugin(sdcpnModellingSkill); + useSdcpnPlugin(); useInstruction( ` diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/artifacts.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/artifacts.ts index e29fe7b14d4..b10b65bc6e8 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/artifacts.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/artifacts.ts @@ -1,5 +1,9 @@ /** Recover Mission 3 workpieces from a Flue `history()` snapshot. */ +import { basename } from "node:path"; + +import { sha256 } from "./campaign-integrity.ts"; + import type { FlueConversationPart, FlueConversationSnapshot } from "@flue/sdk"; export const RUNBOOK_IR_FENCE = "runbook-ir"; @@ -12,21 +16,41 @@ export const latestRunbookIrBlock = (text: string): string | undefined => { return last === undefined ? undefined : last.trim(); }; -const assistantTextFrom = (snapshot: FlueConversationSnapshot): string => - snapshot.messages - .filter((message) => message.purpose === "assistant") - .flatMap((message) => - message.parts.filter( - (part): part is Extract => - part.type === "text", - ), - ) - .map((part) => part.text) - .join("\n\n"); - export const recoverRunbookIr = ( snapshot: FlueConversationSnapshot, -): string | undefined => latestRunbookIrBlock(assistantTextFrom(snapshot)); +): string | undefined => recoverRunbookWorkpiece(snapshot)?.content; + +export interface RecoveredRunbookWorkpiece { + readonly content: string; + readonly sha256: string; + readonly sourceMessageId: string; + readonly sourceMessageSha256: string; +} + +export const recoverRunbookWorkpiece = ( + snapshot: FlueConversationSnapshot, +): RecoveredRunbookWorkpiece | undefined => { + let recovered: RecoveredRunbookWorkpiece | undefined; + for (const message of snapshot.messages) { + if (message.purpose !== "assistant") continue; + const text = message.parts + .filter( + (part): part is Extract => + part.type === "text", + ) + .map((part) => part.text) + .join("\n"); + const content = latestRunbookIrBlock(text); + if (content === undefined) continue; + recovered = { + content, + sha256: sha256(content), + sourceMessageId: message.id, + sourceMessageSha256: sha256(JSON.stringify(message)), + }; + } + return recovered; +}; export const interviewerToolNamesFrom = ( snapshot: FlueConversationSnapshot, @@ -59,3 +83,69 @@ export const skillResourcePathsFrom = ( return [part.input.path]; }), ); + +export interface OrdinaryElicitationViolation { + readonly code: + | "capture-tool-use" + | "construction-resource-read" + | "construction-tool-use" + | "missing-workpiece" + | "unexpected-resource-read" + | "unexpected-tool-use"; + readonly detail: string; +} + +const ORDINARY_TOOL_NAMES = new Set(["activate_skill", "read_skill_resource"]); +const CONSTRUCTION_TOOL_NAMES = new Set([ + "getLatestNetDefinition", + "addType", + "addParameter", + "addPlace", + "addTransition", + "addArc", +]); +const CAPTURE_TOOL_NAMES = new Set(["brunch_ask", "brunch_sweep"]); +const ORDINARY_RESOURCE_NAMES = new Set([ + "universal-elicitation.md", + "profile.md", + "workpiece.md", +]); +const CONSTRUCTION_RESOURCE_NAMES = new Set([ + "pn-construction.md", + "checks.md", +]); + +export const ordinaryElicitationViolationsFrom = ( + snapshot: FlueConversationSnapshot, + options: { readonly hasWorkpiece: boolean }, +): readonly OrdinaryElicitationViolation[] => { + const violations: OrdinaryElicitationViolation[] = []; + for (const toolName of interviewerToolNamesFrom(snapshot)) { + if (ORDINARY_TOOL_NAMES.has(toolName)) continue; + violations.push({ + code: CONSTRUCTION_TOOL_NAMES.has(toolName) + ? "construction-tool-use" + : CAPTURE_TOOL_NAMES.has(toolName) + ? "capture-tool-use" + : "unexpected-tool-use", + detail: toolName, + }); + } + for (const path of skillResourcePathsFrom(snapshot)) { + const name = basename(path); + if (ORDINARY_RESOURCE_NAMES.has(name)) continue; + violations.push({ + code: CONSTRUCTION_RESOURCE_NAMES.has(name) + ? "construction-resource-read" + : "unexpected-resource-read", + detail: path, + }); + } + if (!options.hasWorkpiece) { + violations.push({ + code: "missing-workpiece", + detail: "No recoverable runbook-ir workpiece was emitted.", + }); + } + return violations; +}; diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/campaign-integrity.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/campaign-integrity.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..58329694c85 --- /dev/null +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/campaign-integrity.ts @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@ +import { createHash } from "node:crypto"; +import { readFile, readdir, realpath } from "node:fs/promises"; +import { + basename, + dirname, + isAbsolute, + join, + relative, + resolve, + sep, +} from "node:path"; +import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url"; + +export const sha256 = (content: string | Buffer): string => + createHash("sha256").update(content).digest("hex"); + +const isMissingPathError = (error: unknown): boolean => + error instanceof Error && "code" in error && error.code === "ENOENT"; + +/** Resolve aliases and symlinks even when the final output path does not exist yet. */ +export const canonicalPath = async (path: string): Promise => { + const resolveFromExistingAncestor = async ( + candidate: string, + missingSegments: readonly string[], + ): Promise => { + try { + return resolve(await realpath(candidate), ...missingSegments); + } catch (error) { + if (!isMissingPathError(error)) throw error; + const parent = dirname(candidate); + if (parent === candidate) throw error; + return resolveFromExistingAncestor(parent, [ + basename(candidate), + ...missingSegments, + ]); + } + }; + + return resolveFromExistingAncestor(resolve(path), []); +}; + +export const pathIsWithin = (candidate: string, directory: string): boolean => { + const remainder = relative(directory, candidate); + return ( + remainder === "" || + (!remainder.startsWith(`..${sep}`) && + remainder !== ".." && + !isAbsolute(remainder)) + ); +}; + +export const rejectImmutableBaselineOutput = async ( + outputPath: string, + immutableBaselinePath: string, +): Promise => { + const [canonicalOutput, canonicalBaseline] = await Promise.all([ + canonicalPath(outputPath), + canonicalPath(immutableBaselinePath), + ]); + if (pathIsWithin(canonicalOutput, canonicalBaseline)) { + throw new Error( + "Output path is inside the immutable vestera-prospective-baseline-v1 campaign.", + ); + } + return canonicalOutput; +}; + +const filesystemPathFrom = (specifier: string): string => + specifier.startsWith("file:") ? fileURLToPath(specifier) : specifier; + +export const assertApprovedHermeticModelModules = async ( + repositoryRootPath: string, + modules: { + readonly expert: string; + readonly interviewer: string; + }, +): Promise => { + const approved = { + expert: join( + repositoryRootPath, + "apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation-faux-expert.ts", + ), + interviewer: join( + repositoryRootPath, + "apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation-faux-provider.ts", + ), + }; + const [expert, interviewer, approvedExpert, approvedInterviewer] = + await Promise.all([ + canonicalPath(filesystemPathFrom(modules.expert)), + canonicalPath(filesystemPathFrom(modules.interviewer)), + canonicalPath(approved.expert), + canonicalPath(approved.interviewer), + ]); + if (expert !== approvedExpert || interviewer !== approvedInterviewer) { + throw new Error( + "Hermetic model overrides must use the approved checked-in faux fixtures.", + ); + } +}; + +export interface BuiltArtifactManifestEntry { + readonly path: string; + readonly sha256: string; +} + +export const builtServerArtifactManifest = async ( + repositoryRootPath: string, +): Promise => { + const distDirectory = join(repositoryRootPath, "apps/brunch-agent/dist"); + const entries = (await readdir(distDirectory, { withFileTypes: true })) + .filter((entry) => entry.isFile() && entry.name.endsWith(".mjs")) + .map((entry) => entry.name) + .sort((left, right) => left.localeCompare(right)); + if (entries.length === 0) { + throw new Error("The built server dist contains no .mjs artifacts."); + } + return Promise.all( + entries.map(async (name) => { + const absolutePath = join(distDirectory, name); + return { + path: relative(repositoryRootPath, absolutePath).split(sep).join("/"), + sha256: sha256(await readFile(absolutePath)), + }; + }), + ); +}; diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts index b9a2f4e48cf..5ebd9960926 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ import { recoverRunbookIr, skillResourcePathsFrom, } from "./artifacts.ts"; +import { rejectImmutableBaselineOutput } from "./campaign-integrity.ts"; import { loadBuiltBrunchApplication } from "./load-built-application.ts"; import type Anthropic from "@anthropic-ai/sdk"; @@ -38,7 +39,6 @@ import type { FlueConversationSnapshot } from "@flue/sdk"; process.env["BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL"] ??= "claude-sonnet-4-5"; const execFileAsync = promisify(execFile); -const FROZEN_V1_SOURCE_COMMIT = "b738aa1be1a62a9f9cdde89ced78558f04293a77"; const repositoryRoot = new URL("../../../../../", import.meta.url); const repositoryRootPath = fileURLToPath(repositoryRoot); const evaluationRoot = new URL( @@ -46,10 +46,12 @@ const evaluationRoot = new URL( import.meta.url, ); const caseDirectory = new URL("cases/vestera-scheduling/", evaluationRoot); -const defaultOutputDirectory = new URL( - "../../../../../libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/", - import.meta.url, -).pathname; +const immutableBaselineDirectory = fileURLToPath( + new URL( + "../../../../../libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/", + import.meta.url, + ), +); const expertModel = process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_EXPERT_MODEL"] ?? "claude-sonnet-4-5"; @@ -57,8 +59,10 @@ const hardStop = Number(process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_HARD_STOP"] ?? "8"); const latencyStopMs = Number( process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_LATENCY_STOP_MS"] ?? "180000", ); -const outputDirectory = - process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_OUTPUT_DIR"] ?? defaultOutputDirectory; +const outputDirectory = await rejectImmutableBaselineOutput( + process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_OUTPUT_DIR"] ?? immutableBaselineDirectory, + immutableBaselineDirectory, +); const expertClientModule = process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ANTHROPIC_MODULE"]; const interviewerProviderModule = process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_INTERVIEWER_PROVIDER_MODULE"]; @@ -77,36 +81,26 @@ if (!apiKey && !expertClientModule) { "ANTHROPIC_API_KEY is required unless BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ANTHROPIC_MODULE is set", ); } -const usesFrozenV1Configuration = - process.env["BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL"] === "claude-sonnet-4-5" && - expertModel === "claude-sonnet-4-5" && - hardStop === 8 && - latencyStopMs === 180_000 && - expertClientModule === undefined && - interviewerProviderModule === undefined && - !allowDirtyInstrument; -if (outputDirectory === defaultOutputDirectory && !usesFrozenV1Configuration) { - throw new Error( - "Only the frozen v1 configuration may write to vestera-prospective-baseline-v1; set BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_OUTPUT_DIR for tests or a different campaign.", - ); -} - const instrumentFiles = [ "apps/brunch-agent/package.json", "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/ping.ts", "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/artifacts.ts", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/campaign-integrity.ts", "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/package.json", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/universal-elicitation.md", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/package.json", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/elicitation.md", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/ir-template.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/opening-message.md", @@ -137,14 +131,6 @@ const { stdout: commitOutput } = await execFileAsync( { cwd: repositoryRootPath }, ); const sourceCommit = commitOutput.trim(); -if ( - outputDirectory === defaultOutputDirectory && - sourceCommit !== FROZEN_V1_SOURCE_COMMIT -) { - throw new Error( - `vestera-prospective-baseline-v1 belongs to source commit ${FROZEN_V1_SOURCE_COMMIT}; set BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_OUTPUT_DIR for relocated or redesigned source.`, - ); -} const { stdout: statusOutput } = await execFileAsync( "git", ["status", "--short", "--", ...instrumentFiles], diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v2-run.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v2-run.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4b6b167a1d9 --- /dev/null +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v2-run.ts @@ -0,0 +1,838 @@ +/** + * Candidate v2 prospective elicitation campaign. + * + * This is intentionally separate from the immutable Mission 3 v1 runner. + * Build first, then run one explicitly numbered replication: + * BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_REPLICATION=1 \ + * yarn workspace @apps/brunch-agent runbook:elicit:candidate-v2 + */ + +import { execFile } from "node:child_process"; +import { randomUUID } from "node:crypto"; +import { mkdir, readFile, readdir, rm, writeFile } from "node:fs/promises"; +import { tmpdir } from "node:os"; +import { basename, join } from "node:path"; +import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url"; +import { promisify } from "node:util"; + +import { observe, setProvider } from "@flue/runtime"; +import { createFlueClient } from "@flue/sdk"; + +import { + agentOwnershipHeaders, + flueConversationIdFrom, +} from "../../conversation/identity.ts"; +import { formatFlueTranscript } from "../../conversation/transcript.ts"; +import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE } from "../../http/routes.ts"; +import { + interviewerToolNamesFrom, + ordinaryElicitationViolationsFrom, + recoverRunbookWorkpiece, + skillResourcePathsFrom, +} from "./artifacts.ts"; +import { + assertApprovedHermeticModelModules, + builtServerArtifactManifest, + canonicalPath, + rejectImmutableBaselineOutput, + sha256, +} from "./campaign-integrity.ts"; +import { + type BuiltBrunchApplication, + loadBuiltBrunchApplication, +} from "./load-built-application.ts"; + +import type Anthropic from "@anthropic-ai/sdk"; +import type { Provider } from "@earendil-works/pi-ai"; +import type { FlueConversationSnapshot } from "@flue/sdk"; + +const PROTOCOL_ID = "prospective-runbook-v2"; +const OUTPUT_NAMESPACE_ID = "vestera-prospective-candidate-v2"; +const FROZEN_MODEL = "claude-sonnet-4-5"; +const FROZEN_HARD_STOP = 8; +const FROZEN_LATENCY_STOP_MS = 180_000; +const FROZEN_REPLICATIONS = 3; + +process.env["BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL"] ??= FROZEN_MODEL; + +const execFileAsync = promisify(execFile); +const repositoryRoot = new URL("../../../../../", import.meta.url); +const repositoryRootPath = fileURLToPath(repositoryRoot); +const evaluationRoot = new URL( + "../../../../../libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/", + import.meta.url, +); +const caseDirectory = new URL("cases/vestera-scheduling/", evaluationRoot); +const candidateOutputDirectory = fileURLToPath( + new URL( + "../../../../../libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-candidate-v2/", + import.meta.url, + ), +); +const immutableBaselineDirectory = fileURLToPath( + new URL( + "../../../../../libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/", + import.meta.url, + ), +); + +const interviewerModel = process.env["BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL"]; +const expertModel = process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_EXPERT_MODEL"] ?? FROZEN_MODEL; +const hardStop = Number( + process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_HARD_STOP"] ?? `${FROZEN_HARD_STOP}`, +); +const latencyStopMs = Number( + process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_LATENCY_STOP_MS"] ?? `${FROZEN_LATENCY_STOP_MS}`, +); +const replication = Number(process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_REPLICATION"] ?? "0"); +const outputDirectory = await rejectImmutableBaselineOutput( + process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_OUTPUT_DIR"] ?? candidateOutputDirectory, + immutableBaselineDirectory, +); +const canonicalCandidateOutputDirectory = await canonicalPath( + candidateOutputDirectory, +); +const expertClientModule = process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ANTHROPIC_MODULE"]; +const interviewerProviderModule = + process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_INTERVIEWER_PROVIDER_MODULE"]; +const allowDirtyInstrument = + process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ALLOW_DIRTY_INSTRUMENT"] === "1"; +const apiKey = process.env["ANTHROPIC_API_KEY"]; + +if (!Number.isSafeInteger(hardStop) || hardStop < 1) { + throw new Error("BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_HARD_STOP must be a positive integer"); +} +if (!Number.isFinite(latencyStopMs) || latencyStopMs <= 0) { + throw new Error("BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_LATENCY_STOP_MS must be positive"); +} +if ( + !Number.isSafeInteger(replication) || + replication < 1 || + replication > FROZEN_REPLICATIONS +) { + throw new Error( + `BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_REPLICATION must be one of 1, 2, or ${FROZEN_REPLICATIONS}`, + ); +} + +const hasExpertOverride = expertClientModule !== undefined; +const hasInterviewerOverride = interviewerProviderModule !== undefined; +if (hasExpertOverride !== hasInterviewerOverride) { + throw new Error( + "Hermetic runs must set both test-only model module overrides; paid runs must set neither.", + ); +} +const isHermeticRun = hasExpertOverride && hasInterviewerOverride; +const usesFrozenConfiguration = + interviewerModel === FROZEN_MODEL && + expertModel === FROZEN_MODEL && + hardStop === FROZEN_HARD_STOP && + latencyStopMs === FROZEN_LATENCY_STOP_MS; + +if (isHermeticRun) { + await assertApprovedHermeticModelModules(repositoryRootPath, { + expert: expertClientModule, + interviewer: interviewerProviderModule, + }); + if (outputDirectory === canonicalCandidateOutputDirectory) { + throw new Error( + "Hermetic runs cannot write to vestera-prospective-candidate-v2.", + ); + } + if (apiKey) { + throw new Error("Hermetic runs must not receive ANTHROPIC_API_KEY."); + } +} else { + if (!apiKey) { + throw new Error("ANTHROPIC_API_KEY is required for a paid candidate run."); + } + if (outputDirectory !== canonicalCandidateOutputDirectory) { + throw new Error( + "Paid candidate runs must write to vestera-prospective-candidate-v2.", + ); + } + if (!usesFrozenConfiguration) { + throw new Error( + "Paid candidate runs require the frozen prospective-runbook-v2 model, turn, and latency configuration.", + ); + } + if (allowDirtyInstrument) { + throw new Error( + "Paid candidate runs cannot use BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ALLOW_DIRTY_INSTRUMENT.", + ); + } +} + +const instrumentFiles = [ + "yarn.lock", + "apps/brunch-agent/package.json", + "apps/brunch-agent/vite.config.ts", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/app.ts", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/db.ts", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/ping.ts", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/identity.ts", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/transcript.ts", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/http/routes.ts", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/artifacts.ts", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/campaign-integrity.ts", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/load-built-application.ts", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v2-run.ts", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/package.json", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/universal-elicitation.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/package.json", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/opening-message.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/situation-pack.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/vestera-scheduling/truth-ledger-v1-prospective.yaml", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/ir-quality-ruler-v1.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1/omniscient-grader.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1/cold-ir-reviewer.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v2/protocol.md", +] as const; + +const hashedInstrumentFiles = await Promise.all( + instrumentFiles.map(async (path) => ({ + path, + hash: sha256(await readFile(new URL(path, repositoryRoot))), + })), +); +const fileSha256: Record = {}; +for (const file of hashedInstrumentFiles) { + fileSha256[file.path] = file.hash; +} + +const { stdout: commitOutput } = await execFileAsync( + "git", + ["rev-parse", "HEAD"], + { cwd: repositoryRootPath }, +); +const sourceCommit = commitOutput.trim(); +const { stdout: statusOutput } = await execFileAsync( + "git", + ["status", "--short", "--", ...instrumentFiles], + { cwd: repositoryRootPath }, +); +const instrumentStatus = statusOutput.trim(); +if (instrumentStatus.length > 0 && !allowDirtyInstrument) { + throw new Error( + `Candidate instrument files are not clean:\n${instrumentStatus}\n` + + "Commit them before a paid run. The dirty escape hatch is hermetic-test-only.", + ); +} +if (allowDirtyInstrument && !isHermeticRun) { + throw new Error( + "BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ALLOW_DIRTY_INSTRUMENT is restricted to hermetic runs.", + ); +} + +const builtArtifactManifest = + await builtServerArtifactManifest(repositoryRootPath); +const builtArtifactManifestSha256 = sha256( + JSON.stringify(builtArtifactManifest), +); +const campaignFingerprint = sha256( + JSON.stringify({ + protocolId: PROTOCOL_ID, + outputNamespaceId: OUTPUT_NAMESPACE_ID, + interviewerModel, + expertModel, + hardStop, + latencyStopMs, + fileSha256, + builtArtifactManifest, + }), +); + +interface ExistingCandidateRecord { + readonly protocolId?: unknown; + readonly outputNamespaceId?: unknown; + readonly replication?: unknown; + readonly campaignFingerprint?: unknown; +} + +if (!isHermeticRun) { + let existingNames: string[] = []; + try { + existingNames = await readdir(outputDirectory); + } catch (error) { + if ( + !(error instanceof Error) || + !("code" in error) || + error.code !== "ENOENT" + ) { + throw error; + } + } + const existingRecords = await Promise.all( + existingNames + .filter((entry) => entry.endsWith(".json")) + .map(async (name) => ({ + name, + record: JSON.parse( + await readFile(join(outputDirectory, name), "utf8"), + ) as ExistingCandidateRecord, + })), + ); + for (const { name, record: existing } of existingRecords) { + if ( + existing.protocolId !== PROTOCOL_ID || + existing.outputNamespaceId !== OUTPUT_NAMESPACE_ID + ) { + throw new Error( + `Candidate output namespace contains a foreign JSON artifact: ${name}`, + ); + } + if (existing.campaignFingerprint !== campaignFingerprint) { + throw new Error( + `Candidate artifact ${name} used a different frozen instrument or configuration.`, + ); + } + if (existing.replication === replication) { + throw new Error( + `Candidate replication ${replication} already has an immutable artifact: ${name}`, + ); + } + } +} + +const openingRaw = await readFile( + new URL("opening-message.md", caseDirectory), + "utf8", +); +const openingSeparator = openingRaw.indexOf("\n---\n"); +const openingMessage = ( + openingSeparator === -1 ? openingRaw : openingRaw.slice(openingSeparator + 5) +).trim(); +const situationPack = await readFile( + new URL("situation-pack.md", caseDirectory), + "utf8", +); +const finalizationMessage = [ + "[Evaluation stop instruction; not expert evidence]", + "The interview turn budget is exhausted.", + "Emit the full current Markdown runbook IR in one `runbook-ir` fenced block.", + "Do not ask another question, construct the Petri net, or read construction resources.", + "Preserve every unresolved unknown, not-yet-asked item, declined or deferred item, assumption, conflict, correction, contextual coexistence, omission, and loss.", +].join(" "); + +interface ExpertMessage { + readonly role: "user" | "assistant"; + readonly content: string; +} + +interface ExpertClient { + messages: { + create(request: Anthropic.MessageCreateParamsNonStreaming): Promise<{ + readonly content: readonly { + readonly type: string; + readonly text?: string; + }[]; + readonly model?: string; + readonly stop_reason?: string | null; + readonly usage?: Partial; + }>; + }; +} + +const defaultExportFrom = async (specifier: string): Promise => { + const loaded: unknown = await import(specifier); + if (typeof loaded !== "object" || loaded === null || !("default" in loaded)) { + throw new Error(`${specifier} has no default export`); + } + return loaded.default as Value; +}; + +const latestAssistantText = (snapshot: FlueConversationSnapshot): string => { + for (const message of snapshot.messages.toReversed()) { + if (message.purpose !== "assistant") continue; + const text = message.parts + .filter((part) => part.type === "text") + .map((part) => part.text) + .join("\n") + .trim(); + if (text.length > 0) return text; + } + return ""; +}; + +interface ModelCall { + readonly durationMs: number; + readonly providerId: string; + readonly providerName: string; + readonly api: string; + readonly requestedModel: string; + readonly observedModel: string | null; + readonly observedModelSource: "provider-response" | "unavailable"; + readonly stopReason: string | null; + readonly providerStopReason: string | null; + readonly inputTokens: number; + readonly outputTokens: number; + readonly totalTokens: number; + readonly cost: number; +} + +const unknownFailureMessage = (error: unknown): string => { + if (typeof error === "string") return error; + try { + return JSON.stringify({ error }); + } catch { + return "Unknown non-serializable failure"; + } +}; + +const failureFrom = (error: unknown) => + error instanceof Error + ? { name: error.name, message: error.message, stack: error.stack } + : { name: "UnknownFailure", message: unknownFailureMessage(error) }; + +const startedAt = new Date().toISOString(); +const runId = `${PROTOCOL_ID}-replication-${replication}-${startedAt.replaceAll( + /[:.]/gu, + "-", +)}-${randomUUID().slice(0, 8)}`; +const artifactBase = join(outputDirectory, runId); +const identity = { + principalKey: `principal-${PROTOCOL_ID}`, + conversationId: runId, +}; +const instanceId = flueConversationIdFrom(identity); +const databasePath = join(tmpdir(), `${runId}.db`); +process.env["BRUNCH_DEV_DB_PATH"] = databasePath; +await mkdir(outputDirectory, { recursive: true }); + +const instrument = { + sourceCommit, + instrumentStatus, + fileSha256, + builtArtifactManifest, + builtArtifactManifestSha256, +}; +const campaignConfiguration = { + interviewerModel, + expertModel, + hardStop, + latencyStopMs, +}; +const expertMessages: ExpertMessage[] = []; +const expertCalls: Array<{ + readonly requestedModel: string; + readonly observedModel: string | null; + readonly observedModelSource: "provider-response" | "unavailable"; + readonly stopReason: string | null; +}> = []; +const expertUsage = { + calls: 0, + inputTokens: 0, + outputTokens: 0, + cacheReadTokens: 0, + cacheWriteTokens: 0, +}; +const modelCalls: ModelCall[] = []; +let application: BuiltBrunchApplication | undefined; +let stopObserving: (() => void) | undefined; +let history: (() => Promise) | undefined; + +try { + if (interviewerProviderModule) { + setProvider(await defaultExportFrom(interviewerProviderModule)); + } + + const AnthropicClient = (await import("@anthropic-ai/sdk")).default; + const expertClient: ExpertClient = expertClientModule + ? await defaultExportFrom(expertClientModule) + : (new AnthropicClient({ + apiKey, + maxRetries: 5, + timeout: 30 * 60 * 1000, + }) as ExpertClient); + + const askExpert = async (interviewerText: string): Promise => { + expertMessages.push({ role: "user", content: interviewerText }); + const response = await expertClient.messages.create({ + model: expertModel, + max_tokens: 1500, + thinking: { type: "disabled" }, + system: situationPack, + messages: expertMessages, + }); + expertUsage.calls += 1; + expertUsage.inputTokens += response.usage?.input_tokens ?? 0; + expertUsage.outputTokens += response.usage?.output_tokens ?? 0; + expertUsage.cacheReadTokens += response.usage?.cache_read_input_tokens ?? 0; + expertUsage.cacheWriteTokens += + response.usage?.cache_creation_input_tokens ?? 0; + expertCalls.push({ + requestedModel: expertModel, + observedModel: response.model ?? null, + observedModelSource: + response.model === undefined ? "unavailable" : "provider-response", + stopReason: response.stop_reason ?? null, + }); + const text = response.content + .filter( + (block): block is { readonly type: "text"; readonly text: string } => + block.type === "text" && typeof block.text === "string", + ) + .map((block) => block.text) + .join("\n") + .trim(); + if (text.length === 0) { + throw new Error("The simulated expert returned no text"); + } + expertMessages.push({ role: "assistant", content: text }); + return text; + }; + + stopObserving = observe((event) => { + if (event.type !== "turn") return; + const usage = event.response.usage; + modelCalls.push({ + durationMs: event.durationMs, + providerId: event.request.providerId, + providerName: event.request.providerName, + api: event.request.api, + requestedModel: event.request.requestedModel, + observedModel: event.response.responseModel ?? null, + observedModelSource: + event.response.responseModel === undefined + ? "unavailable" + : "provider-response", + stopReason: event.response.finishReason ?? null, + providerStopReason: event.response.providerFinishReason ?? null, + inputTokens: usage?.input ?? 0, + outputTokens: usage?.output ?? 0, + totalTokens: usage?.totalTokens ?? 0, + cost: usage?.cost.total ?? 0, + }); + }); + + application = await loadBuiltBrunchApplication(); + const client = createFlueClient({ + url: `http://brunch.local/agents/${CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE}/${instanceId}`, + fetch: (input, init) => + Promise.resolve( + application!.fetch( + input instanceof Request ? input : new Request(input, init), + ), + ).then((response) => response), + headers: agentOwnershipHeaders(identity), + }); + history = () => client.history(); + + const logicalTurnDurationsMs: number[] = []; + const dispatch = async (body: string): Promise => { + const firstCallIndex = modelCalls.length; + const admission = await client.send({ message: { kind: "user", body } }); + await client.wait(admission); + logicalTurnDurationsMs.push( + modelCalls + .slice(firstCallIndex) + .reduce((total, call) => total + call.durationMs, 0), + ); + }; + + let interviewTurns = 1; + let stopReason = "hard-stop"; + await dispatch(openingMessage); + + while (interviewTurns < hardStop) { + const previousDuration = logicalTurnDurationsMs.at(-1) ?? 0; + if (previousDuration > latencyStopMs) { + stopReason = "latency-stop"; + break; + } + // oxlint-disable-next-line eslint/no-await-in-loop -- interview turns are causally sequential. + const snapshot = await client.history(); + const interviewerText = latestAssistantText(snapshot); + if (interviewerText.length === 0) { + stopReason = "empty-interviewer"; + break; + } + // oxlint-disable-next-line eslint/no-await-in-loop -- the expert must answer this settled interviewer turn. + const expertReply = await askExpert(interviewerText); + // oxlint-disable-next-line eslint/no-await-in-loop -- the next interviewer turn depends on the expert reply. + await dispatch(expertReply); + interviewTurns += 1; + } + + await dispatch(finalizationMessage); + const snapshot = await client.history(); + const workpiece = recoverRunbookWorkpiece(snapshot); + const ir = workpiece?.content; + const toolNames = interviewerToolNamesFrom(snapshot); + const resourcePaths = skillResourcePathsFrom(snapshot); + const resourceFilesRead = [ + ...new Set(resourcePaths.map((path) => basename(path))), + ]; + const transcript = formatFlueTranscript(snapshot); + const rawConversationSnapshotSha256 = sha256(JSON.stringify(snapshot)); + const violations = ordinaryElicitationViolationsFrom(snapshot, { + hasWorkpiece: workpiece !== undefined, + }); + const status = violations.length === 0 ? "completed" : "invalid"; + const record = { + schemaVersion: 1, + protocolId: PROTOCOL_ID, + outputNamespaceId: OUTPUT_NAMESPACE_ID, + campaignFingerprint, + replication, + runId, + status, + startedAt, + completedAt: new Date().toISOString(), + ...campaignConfiguration, + interviewTurns, + stopReason, + finalizationMessage, + logicalTurnDurationsMs, + modelCalls, + expertUsage, + expertCalls, + expertMessages, + toolNames, + resourcePaths, + ir, + workpiece, + violations, + wroteCaptureStore: false, + instrument, + transcript, + rawConversationSnapshot: snapshot, + rawConversationSnapshotSha256, + }; + await writeFile( + `${artifactBase}.json`, + `${JSON.stringify(record, null, 2)}\n`, + { flag: "wx" }, + ); + await writeFile( + `${artifactBase}.md`, + [ + `# Prospective candidate runbook elicitation — replication ${replication}`, + "", + `- Protocol: \`${PROTOCOL_ID}\``, + `- Output namespace: \`${OUTPUT_NAMESPACE_ID}\``, + `- Run: \`${runId}\``, + `- Source commit: \`${sourceCommit}\``, + `- Interviewer: \`${interviewerModel}\``, + `- Simulated expert: \`${expertModel}\``, + `- Interview turns: ${interviewTurns} (hard stop ${hardStop})`, + `- Stop reason before final IR request: \`${stopReason}\``, + `- Recoverable IR: ${ir === undefined ? "no" : "yes"}`, + `- Member status: \`${status}\``, + ...(violations.length === 0 + ? [] + : violations.map( + (violation) => + `- Ordinary-path violation: \`${violation.code}\` — ${violation.detail}`, + )), + "- Final user message is an evaluation stop instruction, not expert evidence.", + "", + transcript, + "", + ].join("\n"), + { flag: "wx" }, + ); + if (ir !== undefined) { + await writeFile(`${artifactBase}.ir.md`, `${ir}\n`, { flag: "wx" }); + } + + process.stdout.write( + `PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V2_RESULT ${JSON.stringify({ + protocolId: PROTOCOL_ID, + outputNamespaceId: OUTPUT_NAMESPACE_ID, + replication, + stopReason, + hasIr: ir !== undefined, + interviewTurns, + toolNames, + resourceFilesRead, + wroteCaptureStore: false, + artifactBase, + })}\n`, + ); + if (status === "invalid") process.exitCode = 1; +} catch (error) { + let transcript: string | undefined; + let rawConversationSnapshot: FlueConversationSnapshot | undefined; + if (history !== undefined) { + try { + rawConversationSnapshot = await history(); + transcript = formatFlueTranscript(rawConversationSnapshot); + } catch { + // Preserve the originating failure even if history recovery also fails. + } + } + const failure = failureFrom(error); + const workpiece = + rawConversationSnapshot === undefined + ? undefined + : recoverRunbookWorkpiece(rawConversationSnapshot); + const violations = + rawConversationSnapshot === undefined + ? [] + : ordinaryElicitationViolationsFrom(rawConversationSnapshot, { + hasWorkpiece: workpiece !== undefined, + }); + const failureRecord = { + schemaVersion: 1, + protocolId: PROTOCOL_ID, + outputNamespaceId: OUTPUT_NAMESPACE_ID, + campaignFingerprint, + replication, + runId, + status: "invalid", + invalidReason: "runtime-failure", + startedAt, + failedAt: new Date().toISOString(), + ...campaignConfiguration, + finalizationMessage, + modelCalls, + expertUsage, + expertCalls, + expertMessages, + violations, + workpiece, + wroteCaptureStore: false, + instrument, + failure, + transcript, + rawConversationSnapshot, + rawConversationSnapshotSha256: + rawConversationSnapshot === undefined + ? undefined + : sha256(JSON.stringify(rawConversationSnapshot)), + }; + const failureArtifact = `${artifactBase}.failure-${randomUUID().slice(0, 8)}.json`; + let retentionFailure: unknown; + try { + await writeFile( + failureArtifact, + `${JSON.stringify(failureRecord, null, 2)}\n`, + { flag: "wx" }, + ); + } catch (retentionError) { + retentionFailure = retentionError; + } + process.stderr.write( + `PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V2_FAILURE ${JSON.stringify({ + runId, + artifact: retentionFailure === undefined ? failureArtifact : undefined, + failure, + retentionFailure: + retentionFailure instanceof Error + ? { + name: retentionFailure.name, + message: retentionFailure.message, + stack: retentionFailure.stack, + } + : retentionFailure === undefined + ? undefined + : { + name: "UnknownFailure", + message: unknownFailureMessage(retentionFailure), + }, + })}\n`, + ); + process.exitCode = 1; +} finally { + const cleanupFailures: Array<{ + readonly operation: string; + readonly name: string; + readonly message: string; + readonly stack?: string; + }> = []; + const retainCleanupFailure = (operation: string, error: unknown): void => { + cleanupFailures.push( + error instanceof Error + ? { + operation, + name: error.name, + message: error.message, + stack: error.stack, + } + : { + operation, + name: "UnknownFailure", + message: unknownFailureMessage(error), + }, + ); + }; + try { + stopObserving?.(); + } catch (error) { + retainCleanupFailure("stop-observing", error); + } + try { + await application?.stop(); + } catch (error) { + retainCleanupFailure("stop-application", error); + } + try { + await rm(databasePath, { force: true }); + } catch (error) { + retainCleanupFailure("remove-temporary-database", error); + } + if (cleanupFailures.length > 0) { + const cleanupArtifact = `${artifactBase}.cleanup-failure-${randomUUID().slice(0, 8)}.json`; + let retentionFailure: unknown; + try { + await writeFile( + cleanupArtifact, + `${JSON.stringify( + { + schemaVersion: 1, + protocolId: PROTOCOL_ID, + outputNamespaceId: OUTPUT_NAMESPACE_ID, + campaignFingerprint, + replication, + runId, + status: "invalid", + invalidReason: "cleanup-failure", + startedAt, + failedAt: new Date().toISOString(), + cleanupFailures, + instrument, + }, + null, + 2, + )}\n`, + { flag: "wx" }, + ); + } catch (error) { + retentionFailure = error; + } + process.stderr.write( + `PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V2_CLEANUP_FAILURE ${JSON.stringify({ + runId, + artifact: retentionFailure === undefined ? cleanupArtifact : undefined, + cleanupFailures, + retentionFailure: + retentionFailure instanceof Error + ? { + name: retentionFailure.name, + message: retentionFailure.message, + } + : retentionFailure === undefined + ? undefined + : { + name: "UnknownFailure", + message: unknownFailureMessage(retentionFailure), + }, + })}\n`, + ); + process.exitCode = 1; + } +} diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/architecture/boundaries.integration.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/architecture/boundaries.integration.ts index 84dbe327af0..19c809034ee 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/architecture/boundaries.integration.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/architecture/boundaries.integration.ts @@ -507,6 +507,8 @@ describe("the HASH smoke is runnable without a model key or a network (spec §12 "Defines the scripted pi-ai faux provider loaded only by the hermetic prospective-runner test — no provider key, no socket, and no network model call.", "apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-headless.integration.ts": "Boots the built Flue ChatAgent with pi-ai's faux provider and a headless Petrinaut client to prove validated construct-only tool flow without a provider key, socket, or network model call.", + "apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-routing.integration.ts": + "Boots the built Flue ChatAgent with pi-ai's faux provider to prove resolvable-review restraint, required human-gap disclosure, one-question dosage, and workpiece-revision routing without a provider key, socket, or network model call.", "apps/brunch-agent/test/turn-timing.test.ts": "Types recorded Flue observations and model requests so the condition-5 purpose splitter can be unit-tested; the import is type-only — no provider key, no socket, no model call, no runtime boot.", }; diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/build-artifact.test.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/build-artifact.test.ts index fb12b6bb0cd..5d6d38a4b83 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/build-artifact.test.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/build-artifact.test.ts @@ -109,9 +109,16 @@ describe("the emitted server bundle", () => { }); test("packages the authored skill without the retired filesystem loader", () => { - expect(bundle).toContain("createSkillReference"); - expect(bundle).toContain("skill:sdcpn-modelling:"); + expect(bundle).toContain("defineSkill"); expect(bundle).toContain("sdcpn-modelling"); + expect(bundle).toContain("Universal Elicitation Reference"); + expect(bundle).toContain("Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation"); + expect(bundle).toContain( + "Every operational claim has one authoritative home", + ); + expect(bundle).toContain("ask exactly one focused question"); + expect(bundle).not.toContain("## The role (core)"); + expect(bundle).not.toContain("Completion is computed by the harness"); expect(bundle).not.toContain("splitSkillMarkdown"); expect(bundle).not.toContain("skillFileUrl"); expect(bundle).not.toContain("./sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md"); diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/fixtures/candidate-process-model-workpiece.md b/apps/brunch-agent/test/fixtures/candidate-process-model-workpiece.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..57d27646f63 --- /dev/null +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/fixtures/candidate-process-model-workpiece.md @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ +# Process-Model Workpiece + +## Purpose and posture + +### What the model must answer, compare, or support + +Show whether a dispatch crew remains unavailable until final sign-off and becomes available afterward. + +### Who will use it and how + +The operations team will inspect the resource-holding structure before using it in a scheduling comparison. + +### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation + +One batch from entry to dispatch, with only the crew reservation and release path in scope. + +### What the result must not claim + +This account does not establish timing, failure rates, or behavior under simulation. + +## Operational account + +### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources + +- **Expert evidence:** One dispatch crew is available before final inspection. +- **Expert evidence:** Final inspection reserves the crew so no other batch can use it. + +### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use + +- Final inspection reserves the dispatch crew. +- Sign-off releases the dispatch crew in its available state. + +### Case and process spine: flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery + +#### Primary case: inspected batch + +##### Trigger or admission + +A batch is ready for final inspection. + +##### Ordered account and references + +Final inspection reserves the dispatch crew. Sign-off ends inspection and releases the crew. The batch is then ready for dispatch. + +##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes + +Failure and recovery are **Not yet asked**. + +##### Objective dependencies + +The objective depends on the crew being unavailable between reservation and sign-off and available after sign-off. + +### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior + +Inspection and sign-off durations are **Unknown**. + +## Construction notes + +### Candidate target structures + +Represent crew availability explicitly and preserve acquisition and release around the inspection interval. + +### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults + +None before construction. + +### Questions reopened by construction + +None for the tool-schema path; a structurally faithful net would still need the inspection interval represented. + +### Target-representation losses + +None identified before construction. + +## Delivery status + +### What this workpiece currently supports + +Inspection of the crew reservation/release requirement. + +### Consequential gaps + +Timing, failure, and recovery remain unresolved. + +### Net status + +Construction was not attempted. Behavior is untested. diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts index 2940d1c3e10..86167e45e41 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.integration.ts @@ -150,7 +150,10 @@ try { fauxToolCall( READ_SKILL_RESOURCE_TOOL_NAME, { - path: packagedSkillResourcePathFrom(context, "elicitation.md"), + path: packagedSkillResourcePathFrom( + context, + "references/universal-elicitation.md", + ), }, { id: "tool-resource-1" }, ), diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.test.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.test.ts index b252a487cc4..1e68862e1b6 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.test.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.test.ts @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ test("the committed /api/chat door streams a plain Flue agent through server and toolName: "read_skill_resource", }); expect(JSON.stringify(result.readSkillResourceCall?.input ?? {})).toContain( - "elicitation.md", + "universal-elicitation.md", ); expect(result.interviewerToolNames).toContain("activate_skill"); expect(result.interviewerToolNames).toContain("read_skill_resource"); diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/prospective-runbook-v2.test.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/prospective-runbook-v2.test.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..97bf830e2c6 --- /dev/null +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/prospective-runbook-v2.test.ts @@ -0,0 +1,545 @@ +import { createHash } from "node:crypto"; +import { mkdtemp, readFile, readdir, rm, symlink } from "node:fs/promises"; +import { tmpdir } from "node:os"; +import { basename, join } from "node:path"; + +import { expect, test } from "vitest"; + +import { runNodeScript } from "./run-node-script"; + +const testDirectory = import.meta.dirname; +const runnerPath = join( + testDirectory, + "../src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v2-run.ts", +); +const repositoryRoot = join(testDirectory, "../../.."); +const frozenBaselineDirectory = join( + repositoryRoot, + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1", +); +const modelKeyName = ["ANTHROPIC", "API", "KEY"].join("_"); +const fauxExpertPath = join( + testDirectory, + "runbook-elicitation-faux-expert.ts", +); +const fauxProviderPath = join( + testDirectory, + "runbook-elicitation-faux-provider.ts", +); + +const hermeticEnvironment = ( + outputDirectory: string, +): Record => ({ + [modelKeyName]: "", + BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL: "claude-haiku-4-5", + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_EXPERT_MODEL: "faux-vestera-expert", + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_HARD_STOP: "2", + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_REPLICATION: "1", + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_OUTPUT_DIR: outputDirectory, + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ALLOW_DIRTY_INSTRUMENT: "1", + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ANTHROPIC_MODULE: fauxExpertPath, + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_INTERVIEWER_PROVIDER_MODULE: fauxProviderPath, +}); + +const sha256 = (value: string): string => + createHash("sha256").update(value).digest("hex"); + +test.each([ + ["exact", frozenBaselineDirectory], + ["dot alias", `${frozenBaselineDirectory}/.`], + ["descendant", join(frozenBaselineDirectory, "forbidden-descendant")], +])( + "hermetic candidate runs reject the immutable v1 %s path", + async (_, outputDirectory) => { + const { exitCode, stderr } = await runNodeScript( + runnerPath, + repositoryRoot, + hermeticEnvironment(outputDirectory), + ); + + expect(exitCode).not.toBe(0); + expect(stderr).toContain("immutable vestera-prospective-baseline-v1"); + }, +); + +test("hermetic candidate runs reject a symlink into immutable v1", async () => { + const directory = await mkdtemp(join(tmpdir(), "brunch-v2-baseline-link-")); + const outputDirectory = join(directory, "baseline-alias"); + await symlink(frozenBaselineDirectory, outputDirectory, "dir"); + try { + const { exitCode, stderr } = await runNodeScript( + runnerPath, + repositoryRoot, + hermeticEnvironment(outputDirectory), + ); + + expect(exitCode).not.toBe(0); + expect(stderr).toContain("immutable vestera-prospective-baseline-v1"); + } finally { + await rm(directory, { recursive: true, force: true }); + } +}); + +test("hermetic candidate runs admit only the checked-in faux modules", async () => { + const outputDirectory = await mkdtemp( + join(tmpdir(), "brunch-candidate-v2-module-guard-"), + ); + try { + const { exitCode, stderr } = await runNodeScript( + runnerPath, + repositoryRoot, + { + ...hermeticEnvironment(outputDirectory), + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ANTHROPIC_MODULE: join(repositoryRoot, "package.json"), + }, + ); + + expect(exitCode).not.toBe(0); + expect(stderr).toContain("approved checked-in faux fixture"); + } finally { + await rm(outputDirectory, { recursive: true, force: true }); + } +}); + +test("hermetic candidate runs reject a model API key", async () => { + const outputDirectory = await mkdtemp( + join(tmpdir(), "brunch-candidate-v2-key-guard-"), + ); + try { + const { exitCode, stderr } = await runNodeScript( + runnerPath, + repositoryRoot, + { + ...hermeticEnvironment(outputDirectory), + [modelKeyName]: "must-not-be-admitted", + }, + ); + + expect(exitCode).not.toBe(0); + expect(stderr).toContain(`must not receive ${modelKeyName}`); + } finally { + await rm(outputDirectory, { recursive: true, force: true }); + } +}); + +test("paid candidate runs reject a different output namespace", async () => { + const outputDirectory = await mkdtemp( + join(tmpdir(), "brunch-candidate-v2-wrong-output-"), + ); + try { + const { exitCode, stderr } = await runNodeScript( + runnerPath, + repositoryRoot, + { + [modelKeyName]: "not-used-before-output-guard", + BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL: "claude-sonnet-4-5", + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_EXPERT_MODEL: "claude-sonnet-4-5", + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_HARD_STOP: "8", + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_LATENCY_STOP_MS: "180000", + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_REPLICATION: "1", + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_OUTPUT_DIR: outputDirectory, + }, + ); + + expect(exitCode).not.toBe(0); + expect(stderr).toContain( + "Paid candidate runs must write to vestera-prospective-candidate-v2", + ); + } finally { + await rm(outputDirectory, { recursive: true, force: true }); + } +}); + +test("paid candidate runs reject changed frozen configuration", async () => { + const { exitCode, stderr } = await runNodeScript(runnerPath, repositoryRoot, { + [modelKeyName]: "not-used-before-configuration-guard", + BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL: "claude-haiku-4-5", + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_EXPERT_MODEL: "claude-sonnet-4-5", + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_HARD_STOP: "8", + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_LATENCY_STOP_MS: "180000", + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_REPLICATION: "1", + }); + + expect(exitCode).not.toBe(0); + expect(stderr).toContain( + "require the frozen prospective-runbook-v2 model, turn, and latency configuration", + ); +}); + +test("the hermetic candidate run records its exact instrument and workpiece", async () => { + const outputDirectory = await mkdtemp( + join(tmpdir(), "brunch-candidate-v2-success-"), + ); + try { + const { exitCode, stdout, stderr } = await runNodeScript( + runnerPath, + repositoryRoot, + hermeticEnvironment(outputDirectory), + ); + + expect(exitCode, stderr || stdout).toBe(0); + const resultLine = stdout + .split("\n") + .find((line) => line.startsWith("PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V2_RESULT ")); + expect(resultLine, stdout).toBeDefined(); + const result = JSON.parse( + resultLine!.slice("PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V2_RESULT ".length), + ) as { + artifactBase: string; + hasIr: boolean; + outputNamespaceId: string; + protocolId: string; + replication: number; + resourceFilesRead: string[]; + toolNames: string[]; + wroteCaptureStore: boolean; + }; + expect(result).toMatchObject({ + protocolId: "prospective-runbook-v2", + outputNamespaceId: "vestera-prospective-candidate-v2", + replication: 1, + hasIr: true, + wroteCaptureStore: false, + }); + expect(result.toolNames).toEqual(["activate_skill", "read_skill_resource"]); + expect(result.resourceFilesRead).toEqual([ + "universal-elicitation.md", + "profile.md", + "workpiece.md", + ]); + + const record = JSON.parse( + await readFile(`${result.artifactBase}.json`, "utf8"), + ) as { + campaignFingerprint: string; + expertCalls: Array<{ + observedModel: string | null; + requestedModel: string; + stopReason: string | null; + }>; + instrument: { + builtArtifactManifest: Array<{ path: string; sha256: string }>; + builtArtifactManifestSha256: string; + fileSha256: Record; + sourceCommit: string; + }; + modelCalls: Array<{ + observedModel: string | null; + providerName: string; + requestedModel: string; + stopReason: string | null; + }>; + rawConversationSnapshot: unknown; + rawConversationSnapshotSha256: string; + status: string; + workpiece: { + content: string; + sha256: string; + sourceMessageId: string; + sourceMessageSha256: string; + }; + }; + expect(record.status).toBe("completed"); + expect(record.campaignFingerprint).toMatch(/^[0-9a-f]{64}$/u); + expect(record.instrument.sourceCommit).toMatch(/^[0-9a-f]{40}$/u); + expect(record.instrument.builtArtifactManifestSha256).toMatch( + /^[0-9a-f]{64}$/u, + ); + expect( + record.instrument.builtArtifactManifest.map(({ path }) => path), + ).toEqual( + expect.arrayContaining([ + "apps/brunch-agent/dist/app.mjs", + "apps/brunch-agent/dist/server.mjs", + ]), + ); + expect( + record.instrument.builtArtifactManifest.some(({ path }) => + /apps\/brunch-agent\/dist\/node-server-.+\.mjs$/u.test(path), + ), + ).toBe(true); + expect(record.instrument.fileSha256).toHaveProperty("yarn.lock"); + expect(record.rawConversationSnapshotSha256).toBe( + sha256(JSON.stringify(record.rawConversationSnapshot)), + ); + expect(record.workpiece.sha256).toMatch(/^[0-9a-f]{64}$/u); + expect(record.workpiece.sha256).toBe(sha256(record.workpiece.content)); + expect(record.workpiece.sourceMessageId).toBeTruthy(); + expect(record.workpiece.sourceMessageSha256).toMatch(/^[0-9a-f]{64}$/u); + const sourceMessage = ( + record.rawConversationSnapshot as { + messages: Array<{ id: string }>; + } + ).messages.find(({ id }) => id === record.workpiece.sourceMessageId); + expect(sourceMessage).toBeDefined(); + expect(record.workpiece.sourceMessageSha256).toBe( + sha256(JSON.stringify(sourceMessage)), + ); + expect(record.expertCalls).toEqual([ + expect.objectContaining({ + requestedModel: "faux-vestera-expert", + observedModel: "faux-vestera-expert", + stopReason: null, + }), + ]); + expect(record.modelCalls.length).toBeGreaterThan(0); + expect(record.modelCalls[0]).toEqual( + expect.objectContaining({ + requestedModel: "claude-haiku-4-5", + providerName: "anthropic", + }), + ); + for (const requiredPath of [ + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/universal-elicitation.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v2-run.ts", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/opening-message.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/situation-pack.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/vestera-scheduling/truth-ledger-v1-prospective.yaml", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/ir-quality-ruler-v1.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1/omniscient-grader.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1/cold-ir-reviewer.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v2/protocol.md", + ]) { + expect(record.instrument.fileSha256).toHaveProperty(requiredPath); + } + } finally { + await rm(outputDirectory, { recursive: true, force: true }); + } +}); + +test("two identical hermetic runs retain the same build manifest and fingerprint", async () => { + const outputDirectories = await Promise.all([ + mkdtemp(join(tmpdir(), "brunch-candidate-v2-stability-a-")), + mkdtemp(join(tmpdir(), "brunch-candidate-v2-stability-b-")), + ]); + try { + const records = await Promise.all( + outputDirectories.map(async (outputDirectory) => { + const { exitCode, stdout, stderr } = await runNodeScript( + runnerPath, + repositoryRoot, + hermeticEnvironment(outputDirectory), + ); + expect(exitCode, stderr || stdout).toBe(0); + const name = (await readdir(outputDirectory)).find((entry) => + entry.endsWith(".json"), + ); + return JSON.parse( + await readFile(join(outputDirectory, name!), "utf8"), + ) as { + campaignFingerprint: string; + instrument: { + builtArtifactManifest: unknown; + builtArtifactManifestSha256: string; + }; + }; + }), + ); + expect(records[1]!.instrument).toEqual(records[0]!.instrument); + expect(records[1]!.campaignFingerprint).toBe( + records[0]!.campaignFingerprint, + ); + } finally { + await Promise.all( + outputDirectories.map((path) => + rm(path, { recursive: true, force: true }), + ), + ); + } +}); + +test.each([ + [ + "construction resource read", + "construction-resource", + "construction-resource-read", + ], + ["construction tool use", "construction-tool", "construction-tool-use"], + ["capture tool use", "capture-tool", "capture-tool-use"], + ["missing workpiece", "missing-workpiece", "missing-workpiece"], + ["unexpected ordinary-path tool", "unexpected-tool", "unexpected-tool-use"], +])( + "an adversarial hermetic %s is retained as invalid", + async (_, violation, expectedCode) => { + const outputDirectory = await mkdtemp( + join(tmpdir(), "brunch-candidate-v2-invalid-"), + ); + try { + const { exitCode, stdout, stderr } = await runNodeScript( + runnerPath, + repositoryRoot, + { + ...hermeticEnvironment(outputDirectory), + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_FAUX_VIOLATION: violation, + }, + ); + + expect(exitCode, stderr || stdout).not.toBe(0); + const recordName = (await readdir(outputDirectory)).find((entry) => + entry.endsWith(".json"), + ); + const record = JSON.parse( + await readFile(join(outputDirectory, recordName!), "utf8"), + ) as { + rawConversationSnapshot: unknown; + status: string; + violations: Array<{ code: string }>; + }; + expect(record.status).toBe("invalid"); + expect(record.violations).toContainEqual( + expect.objectContaining({ code: expectedCode }), + ); + expect(record.rawConversationSnapshot).toBeDefined(); + } finally { + await rm(outputDirectory, { recursive: true, force: true }); + } + }, +); + +test("a runtime failure retains a machine-readable candidate artifact", async () => { + const outputDirectory = await mkdtemp( + join(tmpdir(), "brunch-candidate-v2-failure-"), + ); + try { + const { exitCode, stderr } = await runNodeScript( + runnerPath, + repositoryRoot, + { + ...hermeticEnvironment(outputDirectory), + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_FAUX_EXPERT_FAIL: "1", + }, + ); + + expect(exitCode).not.toBe(0); + expect(stderr).toContain("PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V2_FAILURE"); + const files = await readdir(outputDirectory); + expect(files).toHaveLength(1); + expect(files[0]).toMatch(/\.failure-[0-9a-f]{8}\.json$/u); + const failureRecord = JSON.parse( + await readFile(join(outputDirectory, files[0]!), "utf8"), + ) as { + failure: { message: string }; + outputNamespaceId: string; + protocolId: string; + replication: number; + runId: string; + invalidReason: string; + status: string; + rawConversationSnapshot?: unknown; + }; + expect(failureRecord).toMatchObject({ + protocolId: "prospective-runbook-v2", + outputNamespaceId: "vestera-prospective-candidate-v2", + replication: 1, + status: "invalid", + invalidReason: "runtime-failure", + failure: { message: "Deliberate faux expert failure" }, + }); + expect(failureRecord.runId).toContain( + "prospective-runbook-v2-replication-1", + ); + expect(failureRecord.rawConversationSnapshot).toBeDefined(); + } finally { + await rm(outputDirectory, { recursive: true, force: true }); + } +}); + +test("an artifact write collision retains the original failure at a distinct path", async () => { + const outputDirectory = await mkdtemp( + join(tmpdir(), "brunch-candidate-v2-write-failure-"), + ); + try { + const { exitCode, stderr } = await runNodeScript( + runnerPath, + repositoryRoot, + { + ...hermeticEnvironment(outputDirectory), + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_FAUX_ARTIFACT_COLLISION: "1", + }, + ); + + expect(exitCode).not.toBe(0); + const files = await readdir(outputDirectory); + const failureName = files.find((name) => name.includes(".failure-")); + expect(failureName).toBeDefined(); + expect(stderr).toContain("EEXIST"); + const failureRecord = JSON.parse( + await readFile(join(outputDirectory, failureName!), "utf8"), + ) as { + failure: { message: string }; + invalidReason: string; + status: string; + }; + expect(failureRecord).toMatchObject({ + status: "invalid", + invalidReason: "runtime-failure", + }); + expect(failureRecord.failure.message).toContain("EEXIST"); + } finally { + await rm(outputDirectory, { recursive: true, force: true }); + } +}); + +test("cleanup errors are visible and retained without masking the run", async () => { + const outputDirectory = await mkdtemp( + join(tmpdir(), "brunch-candidate-v2-cleanup-failure-"), + ); + let databasePath: string | undefined; + try { + const { exitCode, stdout, stderr } = await runNodeScript( + runnerPath, + repositoryRoot, + { + ...hermeticEnvironment(outputDirectory), + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_FAUX_CLEANUP_FAIL: "1", + }, + ); + + expect(exitCode).not.toBe(0); + expect(stderr).toContain("PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V2_CLEANUP_FAILURE"); + const resultLine = stdout + .split("\n") + .find((line) => line.startsWith("PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V2_RESULT ")); + expect(resultLine).toBeDefined(); + const { artifactBase } = JSON.parse( + resultLine!.slice("PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V2_RESULT ".length), + ) as { artifactBase: string }; + databasePath = join(tmpdir(), `${basename(artifactBase)}.db`); + const cleanupName = (await readdir(outputDirectory)).find((name) => + name.includes(".cleanup-failure-"), + ); + expect(cleanupName).toBeDefined(); + const cleanupRecord = JSON.parse( + await readFile(join(outputDirectory, cleanupName!), "utf8"), + ) as { + cleanupFailures: Array<{ operation: string }>; + invalidReason: string; + status: string; + }; + expect(cleanupRecord).toMatchObject({ + status: "invalid", + invalidReason: "cleanup-failure", + }); + expect(cleanupRecord.cleanupFailures).toContainEqual( + expect.objectContaining({ operation: "remove-temporary-database" }), + ); + } finally { + await rm(outputDirectory, { recursive: true, force: true }); + if (databasePath !== undefined) { + await rm(databasePath, { recursive: true, force: true }); + await rm(`${databasePath}.retained`, { force: true }); + await rm(`${databasePath}.retained-shm`, { force: true }); + await rm(`${databasePath}.retained-wal`, { force: true }); + } + } +}); diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-artifacts.test.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-artifacts.test.ts index e95c484dbe1..a8226506e43 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-artifacts.test.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-artifacts.test.ts @@ -2,7 +2,9 @@ import { describe, expect, test } from "vitest"; import { latestRunbookIrBlock, + ordinaryElicitationViolationsFrom, recoverRunbookIr, + recoverRunbookWorkpiece, RUNBOOK_IR_FENCE, skillResourcePathsFrom, } from "../src/evaluations/runbook/artifacts.ts"; @@ -46,6 +48,76 @@ describe("runbook artifact recovery", () => { ].join("\n"), ); expect(recoverRunbookIr(snapshot)).toContain("# Runbook IR"); + const workpiece = recoverRunbookWorkpiece(snapshot); + expect(workpiece?.content).toContain("# Runbook IR"); + expect(workpiece?.sourceMessageId).toBe("a1"); + expect(workpiece?.sha256).toMatch(/^[0-9a-f]{64}$/u); + expect(workpiece?.sourceMessageSha256).toMatch(/^[0-9a-f]{64}$/u); + }); + + test.each([ + ["construction tool", "addPlace", "construction-tool-use"], + ["capture tool", "brunch_sweep", "capture-tool-use"], + ["other tool", "ping", "unexpected-tool-use"], + ])("classifies %s as an ordinary-path violation", (_, toolName, code) => { + const snapshot = { + messages: [ + { + id: "a1", + role: "assistant", + purpose: "assistant", + display: "visible", + parts: [ + { + type: "dynamic-tool", + toolCallId: "t1", + toolName, + state: "output-available", + input: {}, + output: "ok", + }, + ], + }, + ], + } as FlueConversationSnapshot; + + expect( + ordinaryElicitationViolationsFrom(snapshot, { hasWorkpiece: true }), + ).toContainEqual(expect.objectContaining({ code, detail: toolName })); + }); + + test("construction resources and a missing workpiece invalidate an ordinary member", () => { + const snapshot = { + messages: [ + { + id: "a1", + role: "assistant", + purpose: "assistant", + display: "visible", + parts: [ + { + type: "dynamic-tool", + toolCallId: "t1", + toolName: "read_skill_resource", + state: "output-available", + input: { + path: "/.flue/packaged-skills/example/references/pn-construction.md", + }, + output: "ok", + }, + ], + }, + ], + } as FlueConversationSnapshot; + + expect( + ordinaryElicitationViolationsFrom(snapshot, { hasWorkpiece: false }), + ).toEqual( + expect.arrayContaining([ + expect.objectContaining({ code: "construction-resource-read" }), + expect.objectContaining({ code: "missing-workpiece" }), + ]), + ); }); test("collects only successfully read skill resource paths", () => { diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation-faux-expert.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation-faux-expert.ts index fdf1c1de6a2..ea74ca432e6 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation-faux-expert.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation-faux-expert.ts @@ -1,13 +1,45 @@ +import { mkdirSync, renameSync, writeFileSync } from "node:fs"; +import { basename, join } from "node:path"; + const replies = [ "Last Tuesday Line 1 stopped milling because the holding tank before filling was full.", ]; let replyIndex = 0; +let sabotaged = false; + +const applyRequestedRetentionSabotage = (): void => { + if (sabotaged) return; + const databasePath = process.env["BRUNCH_DEV_DB_PATH"]; + const outputDirectory = process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_OUTPUT_DIR"]; + if (databasePath === undefined || outputDirectory === undefined) return; + if (process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_FAUX_ARTIFACT_COLLISION"] === "1") { + const runId = basename(databasePath, ".db"); + writeFileSync( + join(outputDirectory, `${runId}.json`), + "collision sentinel\n", + { + flag: "wx", + }, + ); + sabotaged = true; + } + if (process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_FAUX_CLEANUP_FAIL"] === "1") { + renameSync(databasePath, `${databasePath}.retained`); + mkdirSync(databasePath); + writeFileSync(join(databasePath, "cleanup-blocker"), "retained\n"); + sabotaged = true; + } +}; export default { messages: { - create: () => - Promise.resolve({ + create: () => { + if (process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_FAUX_EXPERT_FAIL"] === "1") { + throw new Error("Deliberate faux expert failure"); + } + applyRequestedRetentionSabotage(); + return Promise.resolve({ content: process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_EMPTY_EXPERT"] === "1" ? [] @@ -26,6 +58,7 @@ export default { cache_creation_input_tokens: 0, cache_read_input_tokens: 0, }, - }), + }); + }, }, }; diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation-faux-provider.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation-faux-provider.ts index 27b6614ead9..398b3abf0fc 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation-faux-provider.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation-faux-provider.ts @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ import { const modelId = process.env["BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL"] ?? "claude-haiku-4-5"; const skillName = "sdcpn-modelling"; +const violation = process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_FAUX_VIOLATION"]; const packagedSkillResourcePathFrom = ( context: unknown, @@ -41,26 +42,57 @@ const faux = fauxProvider({ models: [{ id: modelId, reasoning: true }], }); +const maybeIr = (detail: string): string => + violation === "missing-workpiece" ? detail : ir(detail); +const adversarialToolName = + violation === "construction-tool" + ? "addPlace" + : violation === "capture-tool" + ? "brunch_sweep" + : violation === "unexpected-tool" + ? "ping" + : undefined; + faux.setResponses([ - fauxAssistantMessage( - [ - fauxToolCall( - "activate_skill", - { name: skillName }, - { id: "activate-skill" }, - ), - ], - { stopReason: "toolUse" }, - ), + (context: unknown) => { + const modelRequest = JSON.stringify(context); + for (const requiredPromptText of [ + "You are the Brunch elicitation assistant.", + "Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN", + "substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction", + ]) { + if (!modelRequest.includes(requiredPromptText)) { + throw new Error(`model request omitted: ${requiredPromptText}`); + } + } + if (modelRequest.includes("## The role (core)")) { + throw new Error("model request retained the legacy core prompt"); + } + return fauxAssistantMessage( + [ + fauxToolCall( + "activate_skill", + { name: skillName }, + { id: "activate-skill" }, + ), + ], + { stopReason: "toolUse" }, + ); + }, (context: unknown) => fauxAssistantMessage( [ fauxToolCall( "read_skill_resource", { - path: packagedSkillResourcePathFrom(context, "elicitation.md"), + path: packagedSkillResourcePathFrom( + context, + violation === "construction-resource" + ? "references/pn-construction.md" + : "references/universal-elicitation.md", + ), }, - { id: "read-elicitation" }, + { id: "read-universal-elicitation" }, ), ], { stopReason: "toolUse" }, @@ -71,25 +103,54 @@ faux.setResponses([ fauxToolCall( "read_skill_resource", { - path: packagedSkillResourcePathFrom(context, "ir-template.md"), + path: packagedSkillResourcePathFrom( + context, + "references/profile.md", + ), }, - { id: "read-ir-template" }, + { id: "read-profile" }, ), ], { stopReason: "toolUse" }, ), fauxAssistantMessage([ fauxText( - `Walk me through the last scheduling decision that surprised you.\n\n${ir("Not yet asked.")}`, + "Walk me through the last scheduling decision that surprised you.", ), ]), + (context: unknown) => + fauxAssistantMessage( + [ + fauxToolCall( + "read_skill_resource", + { + path: packagedSkillResourcePathFrom( + context, + "templates/workpiece.md", + ), + }, + { id: "read-workpiece-template" }, + ), + ], + { stopReason: "toolUse" }, + ), fauxAssistantMessage([ fauxText( - `What caused Line 1 to wait in that case?\n\n${ir("Line 1 waited between milling and filling.")}`, + `What caused Line 1 to wait in that case?\n\n${maybeIr("Line 1 waited between milling and filling.")}`, ), ]), + ...(adversarialToolName === undefined + ? [] + : [ + fauxAssistantMessage( + [fauxToolCall(adversarialToolName, {}, { id: "adversarial-tool" })], + { stopReason: "toolUse" }, + ), + ]), fauxAssistantMessage([ - fauxText(ir("Line 1 waited when its mill-to-fill holding tank backed up.")), + fauxText( + maybeIr("Line 1 waited when its mill-to-fill holding tank backed up."), + ), ]), ]); diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation.test.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation.test.ts index 2207039ba95..713ed905791 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation.test.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation.test.ts @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -import { mkdtemp, readFile, readdir, rm } from "node:fs/promises"; +import { mkdtemp, readFile, readdir, rm, symlink } from "node:fs/promises"; import { tmpdir } from "node:os"; import { join } from "node:path"; @@ -12,21 +12,71 @@ const runnerPath = join( "../src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts", ); const repositoryRoot = join(testDirectory, "../../.."); +const frozenBaselineDirectory = join( + repositoryRoot, + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1", +); const MODEL_KEY_NAME = ["ANTHROPIC", "API", "KEY"].join("_"); -test("relocated source cannot write into the frozen v1 campaign", async () => { - const { exitCode, stderr } = await runNodeScript(runnerPath, repositoryRoot, { - [MODEL_KEY_NAME]: "not-used-before-source-guard", - BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL: "claude-sonnet-4-5", - BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_EXPERT_MODEL: "claude-sonnet-4-5", - BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_HARD_STOP: "8", - BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_LATENCY_STOP_MS: "180000", - }); +const hermeticEnvironment = ( + outputDirectory: string, +): Record => ({ + [MODEL_KEY_NAME]: "", + BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL: "claude-haiku-4-5", + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_EXPERT_MODEL: "faux-vestera-expert", + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_HARD_STOP: "2", + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_OUTPUT_DIR: outputDirectory, + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ALLOW_DIRTY_INSTRUMENT: "1", + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ANTHROPIC_MODULE: join( + testDirectory, + "runbook-elicitation-faux-expert.ts", + ), + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_INTERVIEWER_PROVIDER_MODULE: join( + testDirectory, + "runbook-elicitation-faux-provider.ts", + ), +}); - expect(exitCode).not.toBe(0); - expect(stderr).toContain( - "vestera-prospective-baseline-v1 belongs to source commit", - ); +test.each([ + ["exact", frozenBaselineDirectory], + ["dot alias", `${frozenBaselineDirectory}/.`], + ["descendant", join(frozenBaselineDirectory, "forbidden-descendant")], +])( + "relocated v1 categorically rejects the frozen campaign %s path", + async (_, outputDirectory) => { + const { exitCode, stderr } = await runNodeScript( + runnerPath, + repositoryRoot, + { + ...hermeticEnvironment(outputDirectory), + BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL: "claude-sonnet-4-5", + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_EXPERT_MODEL: "claude-sonnet-4-5", + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_HARD_STOP: "8", + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_LATENCY_STOP_MS: "180000", + }, + ); + + expect(exitCode).not.toBe(0); + expect(stderr).toContain("immutable vestera-prospective-baseline-v1"); + }, +); + +test("relocated v1 categorically rejects a symlink into the frozen campaign", async () => { + const directory = await mkdtemp(join(tmpdir(), "brunch-v1-baseline-link-")); + const outputDirectory = join(directory, "baseline-alias"); + await symlink(frozenBaselineDirectory, outputDirectory, "dir"); + try { + const { exitCode, stderr } = await runNodeScript( + runnerPath, + repositoryRoot, + hermeticEnvironment(outputDirectory), + ); + + expect(exitCode).not.toBe(0); + expect(stderr).toContain("immutable vestera-prospective-baseline-v1"); + } finally { + await rm(directory, { recursive: true, force: true }); + } }); test("the prospective runner records a recoverable IR without construction or capture machinery", async () => { @@ -80,8 +130,9 @@ test("the prospective runner records a recoverable IR without construction or ca ]), ); expect(result.resourceFilesRead).toEqual([ - "elicitation.md", - "ir-template.md", + "universal-elicitation.md", + "profile.md", + "workpiece.md", ]); expect(result.wroteCaptureStore).toBe(false); @@ -107,7 +158,7 @@ test("the prospective runner records a recoverable IR without construction or ca "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/opening-message.md", ); expect(record.instrument.fileSha256).toHaveProperty( - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts", ); expect(record.finalizationMessage).toContain("not expert evidence"); } finally { diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-headless.integration.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-headless.integration.ts index e9765cda92f..59b37dfc52b 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-headless.integration.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-headless.integration.ts @@ -37,10 +37,8 @@ const CHAT_MODEL_ID = "claude-haiku-4-5"; const RUNBOOK_SKILL_NAME = "sdcpn-modelling"; const READ_SKILL_RESOURCE_TOOL_NAME = "read_skill_resource"; const RUNBOOK_RESOURCE_FILES = [ - "elicitation.md", - "ir-template.md", - "pn-construction.md", - "checks.md", + "references/pn-construction.md", + "references/checks.md", ] as const; process.env.BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL = CHAT_MODEL_ID; @@ -49,10 +47,7 @@ process.env.BRUNCH_DEV_DB_PATH = join(tmpdir(), `brunch-runbook-${crypto.randomUUID()}.db`); const irPath = fileURLToPath( - new URL( - "../../../libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-runbook-headless/runbook-headless-2026-08-28T11-03-53-683Z.ir.md", - import.meta.url, - ), + new URL("./fixtures/candidate-process-model-workpiece.md", import.meta.url), ); const filledIr = await readFile(irPath, "utf8"); @@ -239,7 +234,23 @@ faux.setResponses([ ), fauxAssistantMessage([ fauxText( - "Construction complete. Assumption: one line state is representative. Unknowns and the IR's commercial and breakdown losses remain unresolved.", + [ + "The mounted tools accepted and returned a minimal self-loop, but it does not yet represent the workpiece's reservation interval. Behavior was not executed or tested.", + "", + "```runbook-ir", + filledIr, + "", + "## Construction update", + "", + "**Agent construction finding:** tool-schema acceptance was reached for a minimal place/transition/arc path.", + "", + "**Target-representation loss:** the constructed self-loop does not preserve crew unavailability between final inspection and sign-off, so structural correspondence with the workpiece was not established.", + "", + "## Delivery update", + "", + "Net status: tool-schema accepted; structural correspondence not established; behavior untested.", + "```", + ].join("\n"), ), ]), ]); @@ -339,7 +350,7 @@ try { process.stdout.write( `RUNBOOK_HEADLESS_HERMETIC ${JSON.stringify({ - sourceIrUsed: filledIr.includes("VW-02 dark tint restriction"), + sourceIrUsed: filledIr.includes("dispatch crew remains unavailable"), parseOk: parsed.ok, placeCount: definition.places.length, transitionCount: definition.transitions.length, @@ -351,6 +362,11 @@ try { ), validationRejections, emittedFreeFormPnJson: assistantText.includes("```pn-json"), + emittedUpdatedWorkpiece: assistantText.includes("```runbook-ir"), + evidenceLevelHonest: + assistantText.includes("tool-schema accepted") && + assistantText.includes("structural correspondence not established") && + assistantText.includes("behavior untested"), userMessages: snapshot.messages.filter( (message) => message.purpose === "user", ).length, diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-headless.test.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-headless.test.ts index 861f0865d74..54c8ef93929 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-headless.test.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-headless.test.ts @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ import { runNodeScript } from "./run-node-script"; const testDirectory = import.meta.dirname; -test("the built ChatAgent constructs a validated net from the saved IR", async () => { +test("the built ChatAgent reports only the construct-only evidence it reaches", async () => { const dbDirectory = await mkdtemp(join(tmpdir(), "brunch-runbook-")); try { const { exitCode, stdout, stderr } = await runNodeScript( @@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ test("the built ChatAgent constructs a validated net from the saved IR", async ( resourceFilesRead: string[]; validationRejections: string[]; emittedFreeFormPnJson: boolean; + emittedUpdatedWorkpiece: boolean; + evidenceLevelHonest: boolean; userMessages: number; wroteCaptureStore: boolean; }; @@ -55,16 +57,16 @@ test("the built ChatAgent constructs a validated net from the saved IR", async ( expect(result.toolNames).not.toContain("brunch_sweep"); expect(result.toolNames).not.toContain("brunch_ask"); expect(result.resourceFilesRead).toEqual([ - "elicitation.md", - "ir-template.md", - "pn-construction.md", - "checks.md", + "references/pn-construction.md", + "references/checks.md", ]); expect(result.validationRejections).toHaveLength(1); expect(result.validationRejections[0]).toContain( "expected number to be >0", ); expect(result.emittedFreeFormPnJson).toBe(false); + expect(result.emittedUpdatedWorkpiece).toBe(true); + expect(result.evidenceLevelHonest).toBe(true); expect(result.userMessages).toBe(1); expect(result.wroteCaptureStore).toBe(false); } finally { diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-routing.integration.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-routing.integration.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8bfe20f2ba6 --- /dev/null +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-routing.integration.ts @@ -0,0 +1,210 @@ +import { tmpdir } from "node:os"; +import { join } from "node:path"; + +import { + fauxAssistantMessage, + fauxProvider, + fauxText, + fauxToolCall, +} from "@earendil-works/pi-ai"; +import { setProvider } from "@flue/runtime"; +import { createFlueClient } from "@flue/sdk"; + +import { + agentOwnershipHeaders, + flueConversationIdFrom, +} from "../src/conversation/identity.ts"; +import { skillResourcePathsFrom } from "../src/evaluations/runbook/artifacts.ts"; +import { loadBuiltBrunchApplication } from "../src/evaluations/runbook/load-built-application.ts"; +import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE } from "../src/http/routes.ts"; + +import type { FlueConversationSnapshot } from "@flue/sdk"; + +const CHAT_MODEL_ID = "claude-haiku-4-5"; +const SKILL_NAME = "sdcpn-modelling"; + +process.env.BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL = CHAT_MODEL_ID; +process.env.BRUNCH_DEV_DB_PATH = join( + tmpdir(), + `brunch-skill-routing-${crypto.randomUUID()}.db`, +); + +const faux = fauxProvider({ + provider: "anthropic", + models: [{ id: CHAT_MODEL_ID, reasoning: true }], +}); +setProvider(faux.provider); + +const packagedResourcePathFrom = ( + context: unknown, + resourcePath: string, +): string => { + const escapedPath = resourcePath.replaceAll(".", "\\."); + const match = JSON.stringify(context).match( + new RegExp(`/\\.flue/packaged-skills/[^"\\s\\\\]+/${escapedPath}`), + ); + if (match === null) { + throw new Error(`skill briefing did not advertise ${resourcePath}`); + } + return match[0]; +}; + +const activateSkillResponse = fauxAssistantMessage( + [ + fauxToolCall( + "activate_skill", + { name: SKILL_NAME }, + { id: "activate-skill" }, + ), + ], + { stopReason: "toolUse" }, +); + +const readResourceResponse = + (resourcePath: string, toolCallId: string) => (context: unknown) => + fauxAssistantMessage( + [ + fauxToolCall( + "read_skill_resource", + { path: packagedResourcePathFrom(context, resourcePath) }, + { id: toolCallId }, + ), + ], + { stopReason: "toolUse" }, + ); + +const assistantTextFrom = (snapshot: FlueConversationSnapshot): string => + snapshot.messages + .flatMap((message) => message.parts) + .flatMap((part) => (part.type === "text" ? [part.text] : [])) + .join("\n"); + +const application = await loadBuiltBrunchApplication(); + +const runScenario = async ( + scenarioName: string, + userMessage: string, + responses: Parameters[0], +) => { + faux.setResponses(responses); + const identity = { + principalKey: "principal-skill-routing", + conversationId: scenarioName, + }; + const client = createFlueClient({ + url: `http://brunch.local/agents/${CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE}/${flueConversationIdFrom(identity)}`, + fetch: (input, init) => + Promise.resolve( + application.fetch( + input instanceof Request ? input : new Request(input, init), + ), + ), + headers: agentOwnershipHeaders(identity), + }); + const admission = await client.send({ + message: { kind: "user", body: userMessage }, + }); + await client.wait(admission); + const snapshot = await client.history(); + return { + resources: skillResourcePathsFrom(snapshot), + text: assistantTextFrom(snapshot), + }; +}; + +try { + const resolvableReview = await runScenario( + "resolvable-review", + [ + "Review this workpiece and tell me the stated objective.", + "```runbook-ir", + "# Process-Model Workpiece", + "## Purpose and posture", + "Reduce missed dispatch windows.", + "```", + ].join("\n"), + [ + activateSkillResponse, + fauxAssistantMessage([ + fauxText("The stated objective is to reduce missed dispatch windows."), + ]), + ], + ); + + const humanGapReview = await runScenario( + "human-gap-review", + [ + "Review this workpiece and resolve the missing release condition.", + "```runbook-ir", + "# Process-Model Workpiece", + "## Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use", + "A crew is reserved, but its release condition is not recorded.", + "```", + ].join("\n"), + [ + activateSkillResponse, + readResourceResponse( + "references/universal-elicitation.md", + "read-universal", + ), + readResourceResponse("references/profile.md", "read-profile"), + fauxAssistantMessage([ + fauxText( + "What observable event makes the reserved crew available to other work again?", + ), + ]), + ], + ); + + const revision = await runScenario( + "workpiece-revision", + [ + "Revise this workpiece: the crew is released only after sign-off.", + "```runbook-ir", + "# Process-Model Workpiece", + "## Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use", + "The crew release condition is unknown.", + "```", + ].join("\n"), + [ + activateSkillResponse, + readResourceResponse( + "references/universal-elicitation.md", + "read-universal-revision", + ), + readResourceResponse("references/profile.md", "read-profile-revision"), + readResourceResponse("templates/workpiece.md", "read-workpiece-revision"), + fauxAssistantMessage([ + fauxText( + [ + "```runbook-ir", + "# Process-Model Workpiece", + "## Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use", + "The crew is released only after sign-off.", + "```", + ].join("\n"), + ), + ]), + ], + ); + + process.stdout.write( + `SKILL_ROUTING_RESULT ${JSON.stringify({ + resolvableReview: { + resources: resolvableReview.resources, + questionCount: resolvableReview.text.match(/\?/gu)?.length ?? 0, + text: resolvableReview.text, + }, + humanGapReview: { + resources: humanGapReview.resources, + questionCount: humanGapReview.text.match(/\?/gu)?.length ?? 0, + }, + revision: { + resources: revision.resources, + emittedWorkpiece: revision.text.includes("```runbook-ir"), + }, + })}\n`, + ); +} finally { + await application.stop(); +} diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-routing.test.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-routing.test.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..05426ce0b59 --- /dev/null +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-routing.test.ts @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ +import { expect, test } from "vitest"; + +import { runNodeScript } from "./run-node-script"; + +const testDirectory = import.meta.dirname; + +test("the built ChatAgent routes review and revision with v3 disclosure restraint", async () => { + const { exitCode, stdout, stderr } = await runNodeScript( + `${testDirectory}/skill-routing.integration.ts`, + `${testDirectory}/../../..`, + ); + expect(exitCode, stderr || stdout).toBe(0); + + const resultLine = stdout + .split("\n") + .find((line) => line.startsWith("SKILL_ROUTING_RESULT ")); + expect(resultLine, stdout).toBeDefined(); + const result = JSON.parse( + resultLine!.slice("SKILL_ROUTING_RESULT ".length), + ) as { + resolvableReview: { + resources: string[]; + questionCount: number; + text: string; + }; + humanGapReview: { resources: string[]; questionCount: number }; + revision: { resources: string[]; emittedWorkpiece: boolean }; + }; + + expect(result.resolvableReview.resources).toEqual([]); + expect(result.resolvableReview.questionCount).toBe(0); + expect(result.resolvableReview.text).toContain( + "reduce missed dispatch windows", + ); + expect(result.humanGapReview.resources).toHaveLength(2); + expect(result.humanGapReview.resources[0]).toContain( + "references/universal-elicitation.md", + ); + expect(result.humanGapReview.resources[1]).toContain("references/profile.md"); + expect(result.humanGapReview.questionCount).toBe(1); + expect(result.revision.resources).toHaveLength(3); + expect(result.revision.resources[2]).toContain("templates/workpiece.md"); + expect(result.revision.emittedWorkpiece).toBe(true); +}); diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md index 48e3c8ce196..795e6b6cfe4 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md @@ -1,113 +1,106 @@ -# Mission 4 — owner-led runbook and workpiece redesign +# Mission 4 — promote and prove the Brunch modelling instrument ## Status -Live. This file is execution authority for [FE-1563](https://linear.app/hash/issue/FE-1563/redesign-the-elicitation-runbook-and-workpiece-against-the-frozen). Mission 3's frozen prospective campaign is the immutable control: one invalid runtime member, two valid independently graded workpieces, and an adjudicated range recorded in [`docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md`](docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md). Its observed artifacts and source revision `b738aa1be1a62a9f9cdde89ced78558f04293a77` remain the exact instrument of record; current source may be relocated, but no relocated branch-tip file may be represented as the frozen v1 instrument. +Live. Amended close contract owner-accepted on 2026-09-02. This file is execution authority for [FE-1563](https://linear.app/hash/issue/FE-1563/redesign-the-elicitation-runbook-and-workpiece-against-the-frozen). -Later projection, provenance, bounded revision, observer, host-continuity, and optimisation concerns remain in [`MISSION.next.md`](MISSION.next.md). They are not implementation authority here. +Mission 3's prospective campaign is the immutable control: one invalid runtime member and two valid independently graded workpieces, with the adjudicated range in [`docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md`](docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md). Its observed artifacts and source revision `b738aa1be1a62a9f9cdde89ced78558f04293a77` remain the exact v1 instrument of record. -### Accepted design decision — Markdown prompt authority and core source topology +### Accepted architecture and interaction decisions -**Observed strain:** a growing generic system prompt would be awkward as a TypeScript literal, while the core package's flat `src/` mixed active evidence contracts, suspended conversation/interpretation/teaching machinery, and plugin SDK declarations. **Local obligation:** keep one authoritative production prompt in `src/SYSTEM.md`, keep temporary prompt-shaping material outside `src/`, and group implementation by the authority that causes it to change without changing public package exports or runtime behavior. **Owner acceptance:** the owner approved the Markdown prompt migration, temporary browseable workbench, and authority-based core topology before implementation. The workbench is non-authoritative and must be deleted or moved into a versioned evaluation protocol when shaping is complete. - -### Accepted design decision — Flue-native package ownership - -**Observed strain:** the app-local `ChatAgent` mixed the core Brunch prompt, SDCPN steering and runbook resources, SDCPN construction tools, Petrinaut host tools, and transport conventions, making none of their package authorities visible. **Local obligation:** follow Flue's native distinction between the agent's returned core instructions, `useInstruction` contributions, progressively disclosed `useSkill` resources, and `useTool` capabilities while exposing core and SDCPN ownership directly. **Alternatives:** preserving a substrate-neutral core would have kept agent composition in `binding-flue`, contrary to the intended split; making core and plugin Flue-native keeps the app as the required directive-marked registration and host composition point. **Owner acceptance:** the owner explicitly selected the Flue-native core/plugin alternative before implementation, then clarified that core must remain deployable in any context and for any output formalism: SDCPN and Petrinaut model-facing identity, guidance, and tools belong to plugin-sdcpn, while browser execution and transport remain app-owned. This decision relocates the existing instrument without changing its runbook semantics and does not reactivate the generalized repertoire/`useElicitation()` runtime. - -### Accepted design decision — plugins pair a domain typology with a target formalism - -**Observed strain:** the formalism-only plugin definition left the reusable operational-process typology with no honest owner, even though SDCPN Recognition, Coverage, Operations, and Verification depend on both that subject-matter typology and the target representation. **Local obligation:** make each plugin carry one reusable domain typology / target formalism pairing while preserving the boundary between reusable typology and concrete user domain. **Alternatives:** keeping plugins formalism-only would scatter domain-typology guidance into core or the app; making plugins per concrete domain would bake scenario nouns into reusable teaching. **Owner acceptance:** the owner selected the paired plugin model. `plugin-sdcpn` carries operational processes plus SDCPN; `plugin-gherkin` carries software behavior plus Gherkin. Concrete operations, organizations, situations, and scenarios remain conversation/workpiece content, never plugin units. +- A prompt carries mounted-lifetime invariants; a skill carries procedure and judgment for a recognizable job; a tool contract carries one executable operation's semantics and constraints. +- Brunch core owns universal, context/domain/editor/formalism-independent elicitation semantics. A plugin pairs one reusable domain typology with one target formalism. The app is the directive-marked registration and host-composition shell. +- The SDCPN plugin is an earned contribution bundle, not a symmetric inventory. It mounts one `sdcpn-modelling` job skill and packages core-authored universal elicitation as a lazy resource inside that skill. +- Packaged skill-composition Candidate B is selected. Frozen v3 showed independent core-skill activation at `0/3` versus packaged disclosure at `2/3` on the opening case, while both candidates restrained universal disclosure on construct-only and resolvable-review cases. The review pair remained non-discriminating. Keep B without claiming full behavioral validation; do not run v4 by momentum. +- Ampcode is the conceptual basis. Retain the Five-Register domain-primary workpiece, one-authoritative-home locality, Flue-native feasibility, and explicit evidence levels for authored text, tool/schema acceptance, structural correspondence, and behavioral evidence. Do not create a third synthesis. +- The remaining v3 content repairs are fixed: strengthen review/revision routing; after required disclosure ask exactly one focused question when human knowledge is needed; and do not load the workpiece template before first creation or material revision. ## Imperative -Manually reshape the technically viable Mission 3 elicitation runbook and Markdown workpiece into a stronger, research-informed candidate that the owner understands and endorses one consequential decision at a time. - -Use the completed research synthesis, historical workpieces, owner-supplied edge cases, and frozen prospective baseline as evidence rather than treating any one source as a specification. The mission should expose where the current package's teaching order, question dosage, epistemic treatment, phase boundaries, or workpiece structure strain under real modelling, make the least structural change that answers each observed strain, and establish the gains, regressions, and remaining uncertainty of the resulting candidate against the frozen control. +Ship the owner-selected Brunch prompt, skill, and domain-primary workpiece architecture as the production SDCPN modelling instrument; prove the exact frozen candidate against Mission 3's immutable control and through an honest visible Petrinaut product boundary; and hand Mission 5 one selected cold-readable workpiece, its exact source Flue conversation, exact instrument/model manifest, and comparative adjudication. -This is not an autonomous rewrite and not a statistical claim of universal superiority. The design conversation and manual walkthroughs are part of the work: the owner expects remodeling itself to reveal consequential corner cases that an agent-generated replacement would miss. +The architecture is decided. This mission now promotes, exercises, evaluates, and closes it. It does not reopen skill topology or expand into capture, projection, provenance interaction, observer machinery, or live net mutation. ## Throughline -One stepwise redesign through the production core-agent and SDCPN-plugin package seam: - ```text -research synthesis + historical workpieces + current authored resources -→ owner and agent inspect one observed strain or edge case -→ agree the local obligation and smallest structural or teaching change -→ manually revise the one-skill runbook/workpiece package -→ walk known and owner-supplied cases through that revision -→ repeat only at the new fog-line -→ freeze a versioned candidate instrument -→ run it through the production Flue ChatAgent -→ grade the recovered workpiece with the frozen ruler -→ compare candidate evidence with Mission 3's frozen control +accepted Ampcode + Five-Register sources +→ repaired production core prompt and packaged SDCPN job skill +→ hermetic mounting, routing, restraint, and construction checks +→ exact-candidate adversarial walkthrough +→ frozen versioned instrument and campaign protocol +→ production Flue ChatAgent candidate runs +→ independent omniscient grading + cold review +→ human comparison with Mission 3's immutable control +→ local/restricted Petrinaut panel → AI SDK → production ChatAgent witness +→ selected frozen Mission 5 workpiece + source conversation + manifest + adjudication ``` -The semantic edit surface is the SDCPN plugin's existing modelling skill: `SKILL.md`, `elicitation.md`, `ir-template.md`, and only the construction/check material whose phase ownership is directly implicated. Brunch core owns the stable Flue agent prompt; plugin-sdcpn owns its additional prompt material, runbook skill, and target-specific tools; the app owns only the directive-marked registration point and Petrinaut host composition. Amend the structural-typing specification only when an accepted redesign decision contradicts it. Keep changes reviewable in small semantic steps rather than replacing the package wholesale. +The production door is Petrinaut panel → AI SDK `useChat`/`onToolCall` transport → long-running Flue `ChatAgent` → provider, with client tools executed through the existing host route. Core returns the universal prompt. Plugin-sdcpn contributes its compact append, one progressively disclosed job skill, read-only documentation capability, and conditionally mounted construction tools. The app registers and composes those contributions without owning their modelling semantics. -The baseline is available as a comparison input, not a design prescription. Its observed range and dispositions must be considered before the candidate instrument is frozen or any improvement claim is made. Candidate runs use a new versioned protocol/output location and preserve their own instrument manifest; they never write into or modify the baseline campaign. +The accepted visible witness is the strongest honest local/restricted Petrinaut panel route. It is not a remote deployment claim. A headless runner, built image, or HTTP 200 is not the witness. ## Proof -This proof establishes that the owner-led redesign produces a coherent candidate runbook/workpiece package with inspectable evidence of its effects. It does not establish projection, provenance, observer consolidation, scoped net revision, comprehensive domain semantics, or final demo readiness. +This proof establishes that one exact candidate instrument was promoted, behaved coherently on the named cases, crossed the production and visible local/restricted product boundaries, and produced an inspectable Mission 5 handoff. It does not establish universal superiority, remote deployment, durable capture, automatic projection, provenance interaction, bounded revision, comprehensive process semantics, or behavior not exercised by a named oracle. Observe all of the following: -1. Each consequential redesign has a recorded observed strain or edge case, the local obligation it answers, the alternatives considered where material, and owner acceptance before implementation. -2. The package remains one real Flue skill with progressive disclosure. Ordinary elicitation stays in operational vocabulary; IR headings, SDCPN structures, and construction schemas do not become an opening questionnaire. -3. The workpiece gives an authoritative, cold-readable home to the objective and process spine; expert evidence; agent inference; assumptions with reason and how-to-check; unknown, unasked, declined, deferred, and conflicting material where present; corrections or contextual coexistence; and construction-opened losses without laundering authorship. -4. Concrete walkthroughs exercise at least opening overload, policy versus practice, contextual quantities, scarce-resource reservation/release, hidden waiting, directional loss, correction versus contextual coexistence, and genuine unknown versus not-yet-asked. Owner-supplied cases may deepen this set. -5. One frozen candidate version runs through the production Flue `ChatAgent` and emits a recoverable workpiece. Its run artifacts record the exact candidate instrument and remain separate from the Mission 3 baseline. -6. Independent omniscient and cold review with the frozen ruler identifies gains, regressions, disagreements, and new mistakes relative to the control. A human adjudication states what the evidence supports without collapsing baseline variation to one mean score. -7. The resulting candidate is sufficient to prepare the prebuilt FE-1476 workpiece or explicitly names the smallest remaining workpiece gap. No projection success is inferred from workpiece quality. - -Prefer one coherent candidate and a discriminating comparison over many lightly reasoned variants. A fluent interview or attractive template by itself is not proof. +1. **Authority and topology.** The production source implements the accepted responsibility split and packaged Candidate B without duplicate universal teaching or a second model-facing agent. Oracle: source/diff review against this contract plus architecture-boundary tests. +2. **Mounted prompt and lazy resources.** The built `ChatAgent` receives the exact compact core prompt and SDCPN append, activates the one job skill for elicitation/review/revision/construction, and reads only branch-relevant resources. Oracle: faux-provider request/resource traces through the built application. +3. **Routing and restraint.** Interactive paths disclose universal and SDCPN guidance before substantive work, ask exactly one focused human-knowledge question after required disclosure, and do not read the workpiece template before first creation or material revision. Construct-only and resolvable-review paths do not interview or load irrelevant resources. Oracle: focused production-boundary tests and retained traces. +4. **Workpiece contract.** The domain-primary workpiece gives one cold-readable authoritative home to purpose and process spine; expert evidence; normalization/inference; assumptions with reason and check; unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, conflict, correction, contextual coexistence, omission, and loss where material; and construction-opened decisions without laundering authorship. Oracle: exact-candidate walkthrough and independent cold review. +5. **Named adversarial cases.** Walkthroughs exercise opening overload, policy/practice, contextual quantities, scarce-resource reservation/release, hidden waiting, directional loss, correction versus contextual coexistence, unknown versus not-yet-asked, and construction-opened loss ownership. Oracle: a fixed matrix mapping recognition → operation → question → authoritative home → epistemic treatment → construction boundary → expected observation. +6. **Production integrity.** Core, plugin, and app exports/builds/typechecks/lints/unit tests pass; ordinary paths expose no capture or construction mutation tools; construct-only execution retains checked tool use and evidence-honest delivery. Oracle: recorded HASH workspace commands and build-artifact inspection. +7. **Frozen comparative campaign.** A new versioned protocol commits and hashes the exact candidate, preserves raw traces/manifests/invalid members, runs through the production `ChatAgent`, and receives independent fresh-context omniscient and cold grading with the frozen ruler. Oracle: campaign artifacts and human adjudication against Mission 3's range without reducing either campaign to a mean. +8. **Visible product witness.** A human can use the selected candidate through the local/restricted Petrinaut panel → AI SDK → production Flue `ChatAgent` boundary and inspect the recovered workpiece. Oracle: retained visible-interaction evidence and owner adjudication; no remote-deployment language. +9. **Mission 5 handoff.** One selected workpiece is frozen with its exact source Flue conversation, exact instrument/model manifest, and comparative evaluation/adjudication. Oracle: close-package audit verifies hashes, paths, correspondence, and cold readability. +10. **Close integrity.** Mission 3 evidence remains byte-for-byte untouched; obsolete shaping workbenches and transient handoff material are disposed only after their surviving content has an authoritative home; future planning is reconciled without loss; Mission 4 is archived and Mission 5 remains unimplemented. Oracle: scoped git diff/hash inspection, planning-home audit, archive-index check, and PR close report. ## Constraints -- Preserve the Mission 3 prospective baseline artifacts unchanged and treat source revision `b738aa1be1a62a9f9cdde89ced78558f04293a77` as the committed v1 instrument. Current source may move without compatibility wrappers; candidate runs must record the relocated files under a new versioned campaign and may not write into the v1 output location. -- Treat the authoritative elicitation research synthesis as evidence and decision support, not a backlog to implement wholesale. Shared-source repetition is not independent corroboration. -- The owner leads semantic and editorial choices. The agent presents alternatives, traces consequences, edits accepted decisions, and runs probes; it does not infer approval or silently choose the final package. -- Work one observed strain or owner-supplied edge at a time. Prefer subtraction, relocation, and clearer authority before adding another catalog, abstraction, or artifact. -- Keep universal elicitation, SDCPN investigation, workpiece structure, and PN construction distinct enough that each can change without turning questions into schema slots. -- Preserve one model-facing agent, one runbook skill, Flue's native returned instructions, `useInstruction`, `useSkill`, `useTool`, resource disclosure, and the production `ChatAgent` door. Do not add a loader, workflow engine, second agent, or TUI. -- Do not add a comprehensive ontology, closed claim kinds, typed completion algebra, generalized plugin/repertoire runtime, observer fold, projection engine, capture-store join, or live Petrinaut mutation path. The statically composed Flue-native core and SDCPN package contributions are the production path, not a reactivation of generalized `useElicitation()`. -- Preserve exact expert evidence and honest authorship. Normalized prose, agent assumptions, unasked material, and explicit user unknowns remain distinguishable. -- Do not tune reusable guidance only to Vestera. Scenario facts and owner examples may test the package but do not enter reusable teaching as universal facts. -- Keep construction outside ordinary elicitation. Move construction-owned material only when the redesign can observe the effect; do not broaden into Mission 5's provider-schema problem. -- Update affected Petrinaut user-facing documentation only if this mission changes user-visible behavior in Petrinaut packages; internal runbook resource edits alone do not create that obligation. +- Preserve the Mission 3 campaign and frozen ruler unchanged. Never write candidate output into `vestera-prospective-baseline-v1` or represent relocated current source as the v1 instrument. +- The owner retains authority over this amended contract, substantive candidate repairs exposed by walkthroughs, the paid budget ceiling, campaign adjudication, witness acceptance, handoff selection, and closure. +- No paid campaign or paid grading call may occur until the exact instrument is frozen and the owner separately authorizes a call and cost ceiling. +- Keep one model-facing agent, one mounted SDCPN job skill, Flue-native returned instructions/`useInstruction`/`useSkill`/`useTool`, progressive resource disclosure, and the production `ChatAgent` door. Add no loader, workflow engine, second agent, or TUI. +- Keep universal elicitation core-authored and lazily composed into the plugin skill. Plugins may name reusable operational-process and SDCPN concepts but never facts or nouns from Vestera or another concrete scenario. +- Preserve exact expert evidence and honest authorship. Normalized prose, agent inference, assumption, unasked material, user-declared unknown, correction, conflict, contextual coexistence, and construction loss remain distinguishable where consequential. +- Keep construction outside ordinary elicitation. Construction may select and record a representation; it may not invent operational facts. Tool-schema acceptance, structural correspondence, and behavioral evidence remain separate claims. +- Do not add capture consumption, durable capture, workpiece-to-net projection, provenance links or UI, inferential observer/fold, scoped patching, generalized plugin/repertoire runtime, typed completion algebra, comprehensive ontology, or live Petrinaut mutation beyond the already mounted construct-only tool path. +- Do not tune reusable guidance to the evaluation case. Evaluation answer keys remain outside interviewer and interviewee inputs. +- Read-only audits may run in parallel. Do not run concurrent writers in the shared worktree. The parent retains integration, freeze, owner-facing trade-offs, comparative adjudication, handoff selection, and close authority. +- Internal prompt/runbook edits alone do not require Petrinaut user-guide changes. If implementation changes a Petrinaut UI surface or behavior owned by Petrinaut packages, update its user-facing docs and flag screenshots that need replacement. ## Fog-line -Do not design the whole candidate before resolving these questions with the owner at the affected resource: - -- Whether the first useful change is teaching order/dosage, workpiece structure, authorship/epistemic treatment, or a smaller combination. -- Whether broad headings survive, collapse into a case/process spine plus epistemic ledger, or become objective slices with supporting cases. Versioned assertion clusters are not the default. -- Whether question batching guidance belongs in always-on routing, the skill body, or elicitation resources, and whether the prospective control replicates historical opening overload. -- How much `Transform to PN` guidance should leave elicitation and whether projection losses should open only during construction. -- How to represent correction, contextual coexistence, declined/deferred material, and directional/context-dependent values without mandatory per-statement semantic typing. -- Which duplicate summaries can be removed only after one authoritative home is demonstrated. -- The smallest candidate campaign that can reveal regression given baseline variance without pretending one scenario proves universal superiority. -- Whether a manually discovered edge belongs in reusable guidance, a probe/grader catalog, the workpiece shape, or mission evidence only. +Do not design past these remaining evidence and owner gates: -Resolve each at the smallest real or paper boundary and record the decision before continuing. A longer fog-line after a walkthrough is calibration, not failure. +- Whether the exact candidate walkthrough exposes a substantive content repair. Any repair must be presented with its observed failure, smallest correction, and regression risk before editing and must rerun affected free gates. +- The smallest versioned campaign that can reveal regression against the control's observed variation without pretending to estimate universal performance. Freeze protocol membership and stop rules before the first paid call. +- The paid-call and cost ceiling. It is intentionally unresolved until the frozen-instrument audit. +- Which valid candidate workpiece is the strongest cold-readable Mission 5 handoff. Select only after independent reports and human comparative adjudication. +- Whether the accepted local/restricted visible witness exposes a product-boundary failure not visible in the headless campaign. Stop and repair the first real failed boundary rather than broadening into remote infrastructure. ## Stop or reorient Stop and surface the evidence if: -- the redesign edits or overwrites the frozen baseline artifacts, case, graders, ruler, or source revision, or presents relocated current source as the v1 instrument; -- the agent produces a wholesale replacement before the owner works through its consequential choices; -- headings or typologies become a scripted intake form or dictate the interview's opening order; -- uncertainty is handled by inventing more mandatory fields rather than preserving it honestly; -- normalized agent prose is presented as verbatim expert evidence or never-asked material becomes a user-declared unknown; -- concrete Vestera or owner-supplied facts leak into reusable teaching; -- construction, projection, provenance, observer scheduling, capture folding, or live net mutation expands into this mission because a later mission may need it; -- a candidate is called better from fluency, parser shape, aesthetics, or one favorable anecdote without the frozen comparison ruler and explicit regressions; -- the redesign requires restoring Condition 5's foreground `brunch_ask`, typed extraction/fold, completion accounting, or minute-scale ordinary turns. - -A need for one stronger structural distinction is not permission to rebuild the retired typed kernel. Name the exact ambiguity and test the least mechanism that could resolve it. +- production implementation starts before owner acceptance of this amended authority; +- any candidate run modifies or overwrites the frozen control, ruler, case truth, graders, or v1 output location; +- universal teaching is duplicated, independently mounted, or eagerly injected contrary to packaged Candidate B; +- workpiece headings, profile registers, or target structures become an opening questionnaire; +- the template or construction resources are read before their branch requires them; +- a review/revision path bypasses required disclosure, or the agent asks a battery instead of one focused human-knowledge question; +- normalized agent prose is presented as exact expert evidence, a correction remains as two active claims, contextual coexistence is collapsed, or not-yet-asked material becomes a user-declared unknown; +- a concrete scenario fact enters reusable teaching; +- construction, capture, projection, provenance, observer, deployment infrastructure, or live mutation scope expands because a later mission may need it; +- a paid call begins without a frozen clean instrument and explicit owner ceiling; +- a candidate is called better from fluency, aesthetics, parser shape, one favorable member, or a collapsed mean; +- a headless run, image, HTTP status, or local panel interaction is described as a remote deployment; +- closure cannot identify one exact selected workpiece, source conversation, instrument/model manifest, and adjudication. ## Deferred -Mission 5 owns the first workpiece-to-live-SDCPN projection and evidence-backed provenance answer. Mission 6 owns bounded reviewer re-elicitation and scoped net patching. Mission 7 owns the complete six-beat rehearsal and optimisation handoff. The inferential observer remains an optional spike rather than this mission's workpiece mechanism. Host/session continuity, compaction, voice, broad observability, simulated-conversation viewing, and remote release remain in `MISSION.next.md` unless this mission's real throughline exposes a direct blocker. +Mission 5 owns capture-backed review and the first visible evidence-backed “why” answer over the frozen prepared pair. Mission 6 owns automatic traceable projection into one meaningful live SDCPN region. Mission 7 owns bounded authorized reviewer revision and scoped net patching. Mission 8's deployment branch stopped after local application proof and retains the unresolved infrastructure/release gates. Mission 9 owns the eventual accepted optimisation handoff after its consumer contract exists. + +The inferential observer, host/session continuity beyond the fixed local witness, compaction, voice, broad observability, simulated-conversation viewing, remote release, and public product choice remain in [`MISSION.next.md`](MISSION.next.md) unless the real Mission 4 throughline exposes a direct blocker. No deferred item is implementation authority here. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-candidate-v2/exact-candidate-walkthrough.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-candidate-v2/exact-candidate-walkthrough.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5975769aeb7 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-candidate-v2/exact-candidate-walkthrough.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +# Mission 4 exact-candidate walkthrough + +Status: accepted pre-freeze walkthrough of the production candidate. This is a paper and +hermetic-oracle review, not a paid campaign member or behavioral superiority claim. + +| Case | Recognition and operation | Focused question | Authoritative workpiece home and epistemic treatment | Construction boundary and oracle | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| Opening overload | Treat many opening facts as an interaction-bandwidth risk; select the smallest consequential absence and follow one concrete case. | Which decision should this model help you make first? | `Purpose and posture`; supplied facts remain expert evidence and agent organization remains normalization. | Do not construct or load the template. Built-agent routing must read universal + profile guidance and ask one question before any template read. | +| Policy versus practice | Recognize normative language and test the practiced rule with the last contested case. | In the last contested case, what rule did people actually use to decide who went first? | `Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes`; retain prescribed and practiced accounts separately. | Compile only evidenced practiced conditions. Cold review must find both accounts rather than a silently selected rule. | +| Contextual quantities | Treat an unqualified value as potentially hiding mode, direction, load, calendar, or item regimes; investigate the selector relevant to purpose. | For the model's stated comparison, in which operating regime does the 20-minute duration apply? | `Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior`; retain source precision and selecting context without averaging. | Use conditioned parameters or preserve an unknown. Checks must find no unsupported unconditional value. | +| Scarce-resource reservation and release | Recognize a contended reserved resource and close the smallest missing release distinction. | What observable event makes the reserved crew available to other work again? | `Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use`; release stays `Not yet asked` until answered, then becomes expert evidence. | Hold availability between acquisition and evidenced release. The human-gap routing test must disclose both elicitation resources and ask exactly one question. | +| Hidden waiting | Treat waiting as a symptom of a resource, prerequisite, calendar, batch, transport, policy, or disruption; ask for its enabling condition. | What observable event makes the waiting case able to continue? | `Case and process spine`; proposed causes remain agent hypotheses until supported. | Derive waiting from surrounding conditions, never an independently elicited queue. Structural review must trace any waiting place to those conditions. | +| Directional loss | Recognize a potentially asymmetric mode change and investigate the missing direction. | What time, material, or capacity loss occurs when changing from B back to A? | Relevant activity plus contextual quantity; the reverse direction remains `Not yet asked`, never inferred symmetric. | Use distinct directional structures only where supported. Missing reverse evidence remains visible rather than copied. | +| Correction versus contextual coexistence | State the differing accounts without choosing; establish correction, conflict, or selecting context. | Does the later statement replace the earlier one, or do both hold under different conditions? | Beside the affected authoritative claim; a correction leaves one active account, while coexistence retains both with conditions. | Do not mutate target structure until settled. The workpiece must show neither an average nor two unqualified active truths. | +| Unknown versus not yet asked | Absence alone does not establish ignorance; determine whether inquiry occurred. | Has this value been asked and found unknowable, or has it not yet been asked? | Beside the affected claim as exactly `Unknown` or `Not yet asked`. | Parameterize an unknown only when faithful; a material unasked distinction remains a re-entry gap. Cold review checks for laundering between states. | +| Construction-opened loss ownership | Recognize inability of target/tooling to preserve meaning as a construction finding, not new operational evidence. | None: target/tool evidence, not human knowledge, determines this loss. | `Construction notes → Target-representation losses`, referencing the unchanged authoritative operational claim; authorship is agent construction finding. | Preserve the workpiece truth and state the highest evidence level reached. Construct-only proof must return the updated full workpiece and distinguish schema acceptance, structural review, and behavior. | + +## Disposition + +The authored prompt, packaged skill, profile, workpiece, construction guidance, and checks satisfy +the nine walkthroughs. The initial construct-only fixture overstated a legacy parse proof and used +the retired workpiece shape; it was replaced before freeze with a current-format fixture whose +delivery explicitly reports tool-schema acceptance, absent structural correspondence, and untested +behavior. + +No content repair remains pre-authorized by this walkthrough. Any later campaign or visible-product +failure reopens only the smallest implicated candidate text through owner-visible adjudication. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v2/protocol.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v2/protocol.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..78bd60453de --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v2/protocol.md @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ +# Prospective runbook candidate v2 + +Status: **frozen candidate protocol; not executed** + +Protocol id: `prospective-runbook-v2` +Observed-output namespace: `vestera-prospective-candidate-v2` + +This protocol drives the built production `ChatAgent` against the same Vestera case and frozen ruler as the immutable Mission 3 control. It creates three independent candidate members for comparison with that control. It does not alter, replace, or add members to `vestera-prospective-baseline-v1`, and it does not authorize paid calls or grading. + +## Frozen campaign configuration + +| Setting | Value | +| --- | --- | +| Case | `vestera-scheduling` | +| Opening message | `../../cases/vestera-scheduling/opening-message.md` | +| Expert pack | `../../cases/vestera-scheduling/situation-pack.md` | +| Prospective ledger | `../../oracles/vestera-scheduling/truth-ledger-v1-prospective.yaml` | +| Quality ruler | `../../oracles/ir-quality-ruler-v1.md` | +| Interviewer | built production `ChatAgent`, requested model `claude-sonnet-4-5` | +| Simulated expert | requested model `claude-sonnet-4-5` | +| Interview turns | 8 before the final workpiece request | +| Per-logical-turn latency stop | 180,000 ms | +| Replications | 3 independent conversations, numbered 1–3 | +| Sampling | provider default; no seed | +| Omniscient grader | frozen `../ir-quality-ruler-v1/omniscient-grader.md`, fresh context per run | +| Cold reviewer | frozen `../ir-quality-ruler-v1/cold-ir-reviewer.md`, separate fresh context per run | +| Observed output | `../../../docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-candidate-v2/` | + +Changing any frozen value requires a new protocol and output namespace. The 180-second stop is retained from v1 because no accepted evidence requires changing it. + +## Instrument freeze and paid-run preconditions + +The runner records SHA-256 hashes for the exact promoted core prompt and universal resource; the plugin append, Flue mount, assembled skill definition, and every assembled skill resource; the application and campaign runner paths; the Vestera inputs and prospective ledger; the frozen ruler and grader prompts; this protocol; and the root `yarn.lock`. It also records the source commit and a deterministically path-sorted manifest containing the path and SHA-256 hash of every built server `apps/brunch-agent/dist/*.mjs` artifact. The campaign fingerprint covers the complete source/lock hash map, complete built-artifact manifest, requested models, and stop configuration. + +Before any paid invocation, the owner must separately approve the paid-call and cost ceiling and confirm: + +1. Every scoped instrument file is committed and clean. +2. The app was built from that clean scope. +3. `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY` is set and no hermetic model module or dirty-instrument override is set. +4. The output directory resolves, after lexical normalization and symlink resolution, to exactly `vestera-prospective-candidate-v2`. +5. Models, turn stop, and latency stop exactly match the table above. +6. The requested replication number is 1, 2, or 3 and has no prior artifact. + +Both the relocated v1 runner and this runner canonicalize output paths through the nearest existing real path. They categorically reject the immutable `vestera-prospective-baseline-v1` directory and every descendant, including `/.`, symlink, nonexistent-descendant, and hermetic-override aliases. The relocated v1 runner can no longer add a baseline member under any configuration. + +The first observed candidate member fixes the campaign fingerprint. Later members must match its exact source/lock hashes, complete built artifact manifest, requested models, and stop configuration. A runtime or integrity failure still consumes its replication: retain it as an invalid member rather than replacing it. + +## Paid commands + +Do not run these commands until the owner authorizes the paid budget. Once authorized, run them sequentially from the repository root: + +```sh +BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_REPLICATION=1 yarn workspace @apps/brunch-agent runbook:elicit:candidate-v2 +BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_REPLICATION=2 yarn workspace @apps/brunch-agent runbook:elicit:candidate-v2 +BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_REPLICATION=3 yarn workspace @apps/brunch-agent runbook:elicit:candidate-v2 +``` + +The package script builds the application before each invocation. Each command uses a fresh Flue conversation identity and temporary database and writes a unique immutable artifact stem. + +## Stop, validity, and evidence semantics + +- The opening dispatch counts as interview turn 1. +- The runner alternates the production interviewer and simulated expert until eight interviewer turns have settled, unless a logical interviewer turn exceeds 180 seconds or yields no visible text. +- It then sends a labelled evaluation stop instruction that is not expert evidence. The instruction requests only the current `runbook-ir` workpiece and forbids another question, construction, and construction-resource reads. +- A member is `completed` only when it contains a recoverable workpiece and the ordinary path has no declared violation. +- Reading `pn-construction.md` or `checks.md`, using a construction or capture tool, using any other tool outside `activate_skill` and `read_skill_resource`, reading any resource outside the three declared elicitation/workpiece resources, or omitting the workpiece makes the member `invalid`. The artifact is retained and the runner exits nonzero. +- A simulated-expert, interviewer, application, artifact-write, or other runtime failure writes an `invalid` record with `invalidReason: runtime-failure` and exits nonzero. +- A cleanup error writes a separate `invalid` record with `invalidReason: cleanup-failure`, is printed to stderr, and forces a nonzero exit. Its presence invalidates the member even if a completed record was written first. +- The runner does not interpret model self-report as completion. + +## Artifacts and immutability + +The candidate namespace is: + +```text +docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-candidate-v2/ +``` + +A completed or ordinary-path-invalid run writes: + +- `.json` — the raw run record, exact raw Flue `history()` snapshot, snapshot hash, readable transcript, expert exchange, call metadata, usage, resource/tool traces, violations, configuration, and exact instrument manifest; +- `.md` — readable transcript and run metadata; +- `.ir.md` — recovered workpiece, when one was emitted. + +The JSON record binds the selected workpiece to its SHA-256 hash, source Flue message id, and source-message SHA-256 hash. It retains the exact raw snapshot object and the SHA-256 hash of its compact JSON serialization; the readable transcript is a projection, not the source record. + +Every expert call records the requested model, provider-reported response model when present, an explicit `unavailable` source when absent, and the provider stop reason when present. Every interviewer call records requested model, provider id/name/API metadata, provider-reported response model when present, and normalized/provider stop reasons. Requested identity is never reported as observed identity without provider evidence. + +A runtime failure writes `.failure-.json`; cleanup failures write `.cleanup-failure-.json`. Failure records use paths distinct from `.json`, so a prior successful write or collision cannot mask the originating error through a second `wx` attempt. Retention failures are reported alongside the original failure. All observed-member writes use create-new semantics. Never edit, overwrite, delete, or replace an observed member. + +## Hermetic verification + +Hermetic execution requires both model overrides, admits only the canonical real paths of the checked-in `runbook-elicitation-faux-expert.ts` and `runbook-elicitation-faux-provider.ts` fixtures, rejects any `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY`, rejects the candidate and immutable-control namespaces, and permits the dirty-instrument escape hatch only for this free path. Arbitrary executable override modules are not accepted. + +Focused tests prove exact, `/.`, descendant, and symlink immutability guards; approved-module and API-key gates; full built-server and root-lock fingerprinting; stable manifests and fingerprints across two identical hermetic runs; raw-snapshot and workpiece/source-message hashing; requested-versus-observed model metadata; adversarial construction-resource, unexpected-tool, capture/construction classification, and missing-workpiece invalidation; distinct artifact-write failure retention; and visible retained cleanup failures. No paid or network model call occurs. + +## Grading after campaign execution + +Do not add graders or grade anything while preparing this protocol. After all three paid members exist, grade each valid workpiece exactly as v1: + +1. Give a fresh omniscient context exactly the frozen omniscient prompt, situation pack, prospective ledger, exact source conversation, and recovered workpiece. +2. Give a separate fresh cold context exactly the frozen cold-review prompt, opening message, and recovered workpiece. +3. Record exact requested and observed grader provider/model identity and retain both reports beside the run. +4. Human-review hard failures, genuine disagreement, and every `NEW-*` mistake. +5. Adjudicate score vectors, gate rates, mistake counts, cost/turn/token/latency observations, and failures against Mission 3's observed range. Do not collapse either campaign to a mean. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md index f9537b21694..6c8049566df 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md @@ -1,107 +1,27 @@ ---- -foo: bar ---- - # Universal Elicitation -## The role (core) - -You are a universal elicitation assistant. You help users model plans or systems, in a given domain context, according to given methodologies/pradigms and/or target output formalisms. You also help them analyze and existing models, and modify them. You do these things by interviewing: asking them the right kinds of questions, about the right things, at the right time. - -The domain typology context for any given elicitation, as well as its corresponding target methodology/formalism, will be provided via a plugin. The following _core_ directives will be complemented by more specific directives from the _plugin_, appended following. - -## The job (core) - -Interview a user about something they are trying to model, design, or build. Capture the results of this in a rich intermediate representation. Produce one or more output artefacts from it, according to a target methodology or formalism. - -## How to do it - -### Procedure - -#### Kickoffs - -_What to establish before any structure, and how. Kickoff produces a posture — the stance the rest of the interview takes from the expert's time, intended use, required confidence, and tolerance for proposed assumptions. It is a form the interviewer fills implicitly, never an opening battery of questions._ - -1. Establish the user's domain context and objectives. This, together with the the output contract of the target formalism, defines the scope and depth of information that will be needed to achieve completion. Let it prioritise the rest. Depth is objective-relative: a fact earns probing when an objective needs it. - -2. Calibrate your elicitation to the user's appetite. Questions should be shaped and prioritized relative to limits of the user's availability (e.g. time, number of questions, etc.) - -#### Trajectories - -_Which movements in which bias, varied by posture. Stated as postures the interviewer moves between, never as a state machine; the interviewer chooses among what applies._ - -1. Gather their intentions and knowledge, uncover their assumptions, requirements and unknowns, and pursue decisions and resolutions, to the depth required by their objective - -2. Use the expert's own vocabulary, as you work. Do not use the abstract vocabulary of the formalism unless the expert uses it or indicates that you should. -- __Slice, then sweep.__ First walk one concrete case end to end ("walk me through one order, from arriving to shipping") to expose the structure; then sweep each category systematically across everything the slice revealed. -- __Probe; don't settle for the first answer.__ Follow up on vague terms and quantifiers ("usually", "roughly", "mostly fine") — each hides either a distribution or an exception. Ask for last-time-it-happened stories rather than generalisations. Check consistency: when two answers tension against each other, say so and ask. -- __Ask for absences explicitly.__ "Is there anything that never happens?" and "what am I not asking about?" (clearinghouse) near the end of each topic. -- __Batch breadth, sequence depth.__ You may group 2–4 related survey questions in one turn, but probe one thread at a time when digging. -- __Keep an assumption ledger.__ Any value or rule you supply that the expert did not state — defaults, simplifications, made-up numbers — goes in an explicit numbered list, each entry marked with why it was assumed and how to check it. Never let an assumption pass silently into the model. - - -#### Closings - -_How to end honestly. Completion is computed by the harness from the model, never felt from the conversation; whether a session may stop is the harness's decision, not this key's. Close says what to say and deliver when the interview ends, complete or not._ - -- __End properly.__ Before producing the model: summarise what you have per category, state what is missing or assumed, and give the expert one chance to correct you. Do not end the interview merely because the expert seems busy; if pressed for time, say what is still missing and let them choose. Do not keep interviewing once the categories are covered to the depth the objectives need. - - -### Methods - - - -### Judgment - - - -### Licenses - -You are permitted to make moves that a cooperative model would otherwise suppress. You should always observe the limits of the user's availability and their appetite; but you licensed to strive for precision, accuracy, coherence and completion in the interest of their objectives/questions - -### Movements - -The two shapes a stretch of interview takes. A slice walks one concrete case end to end and is where the model's structure comes from. A sweep makes one property hold across one stratum and is what finds what was never asked. The completion report is the map of what is unknown, never the order to ask in. - -### Plugin-specific directives - -- __Patterns__: Patterns are discretionary. Each names the model situation that triggers it and the question that resolves it. None names a domain; each applies wherever its trigger appears. The harness surfaces a pattern when a node matches its trigger and the relevant slot is unsatisfied; the interviewer decides whether and how to use it. - -- __Techniques__: Question forms that deepen one answer already given. A technique is applied to a thread, one at a time, when the answer in hand is not yet usable; it is never a schedule of questions. +You are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select. -- __Lenses__: What to attend to in the expert's talk: the interview situations the harness can name — conflict, competing alternatives, ambiguity, weak or missing evidence, clusters of absence, pressure at a choice point — and where the formalism's kinds hide in ordinary speech. A lens says what something looks like when it appears and what to do then; it never says what to ask next. +## Purpose-relative attention -- __Motifs__: Recurring shapes the formalism knows — offered as scaffolds for a question, never as a catalogue to assemble structure from. The interviewer asks whether a motif is present and with what parameters; it never generates a model from the motif. +Establish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category. -- __Smells__: Signs in the interviewer's own output — not the expert's — that the interview has gone wrong. Each names what to look for in what was just said or recorded. +## Interaction -- __Rabbit holes__: Where not to dig, and what looks like progress and is not. Anti-guidance, kept here so that every other key can be stated positively. +Use the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame. -- __Failure modes__: Named ways an interview of this kind fails, each with the signature by which it is detected. The failures this guidance exists to prevent; read them as judgments to check against, not as rules. +## Authorship and uncertainty +Keep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them. - +## Target transformation and evidence -## What "done" looks like +Keep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct. -When the interview is complete, produce: (a) the model, in the most faithful representation the target tooling allows, with every element named in the expert's own vocabulary; (b) the assumption ledger; (c) a short account of what the model deliberately leaves out and why. +## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery - +Maintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible. -## How to check +## Extension contract - +Target-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts index cd4fbfe75fb..62e9532fc8f 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@ import { useModel } from "@flue/runtime"; import systemPrompt from "../SYSTEM.md?raw"; +import universalElicitationReference from "../universal-elicitation.md?raw"; /** * Mount the capabilities owned by Brunch core and return its system prompt. @@ -12,3 +13,6 @@ export function useBrunchAgent(model: string): string { useModel(model); return systemPrompt.replace(/^\s+|\s+$/gu, ""); } + +/** Core-owned progressive elicitation teaching for explicit skill composition. */ +export { universalElicitationReference }; diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/universal-elicitation.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/universal-elicitation.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..449d3f7066e --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/universal-elicitation.md @@ -0,0 +1,214 @@ +# Universal Elicitation Reference + +This reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies. + +The registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece. + +## Directives + +### Work from purpose + +Establish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it. + +### Accumulate posture conversationally + +Learn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form. + +### Follow the person's account + +Use the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account. + +### Protect interaction bandwidth + +Do not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time. + +### Preserve authorship and uncertainty + +Keep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not. + +Preserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result. + +### Treat divergence as information + +Do not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes. + +### Maintain a recoverable workpiece + +Record useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached. + +### Stop honestly + +Completion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible. + +## Recognition + +Recognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question. + +### Vague or compressed language + +Words such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it. + +### Normative language + +“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists. + +### Tension within or between accounts + +An answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood. + +### Unexplained terms and artifacts + +Local terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading. + +### Burden, impatience, or limited availability + +These are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly. + +### Diminishing yield + +Several turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question. + +### Assent without independent wording + +Quick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content. + +### Silence and absence + +Material may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds. + +## Operations + +Choose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule. + +### Select the smallest consequential absence + +Compare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it. + +### Slice a concrete case + +Walk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced. + +### Sweep one property + +After a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category. + +### Ask for the last occurrence + +When a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons. + +### Ask for the basis + +Ask how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement. + +### Ground a term or artifact + +Ask for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts. + +### Clarify until observable + +Clarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe. + +### Use contrastive cases + +When ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies. + +### Investigate quantities relative to purpose + +Before deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency. + +### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold + +When an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose. + +### State a contradiction without resolving it + +Put the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them. + +### Restate for correction + +Offer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept. + +### Propose structure for correction + +When low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it. + +### Deposit and defer + +When an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit. + +### Press without trapping + +When time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed. + +### Explore a rare or severe outcome + +Use a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment. + +### Seek a witness or counterexample + +Ask for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule. + +### Trade concrete outcomes + +When a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate. + +### Close with one correction opportunity + +Before a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage. + +## Coverage + +Coverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model. + +A workpiece may need to preserve: + +- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation; +- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms; +- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on; +- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter; +- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes; +- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording; +- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship; +- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked; +- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation; +- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence; +- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and +- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning. + +Coverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible. + +## Verification + +Verification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence. + +### Before asking + +- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty. +- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template. +- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame. +- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours. + +### Before recording + +- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default. +- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule. +- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence. +- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account. + +### Before closing + +- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction. +- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting. +- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category. +- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion. + +### Failure signals and repairs + +- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker. +- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty. +- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption. +- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it. +- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire. +- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps. +- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition. +- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/package.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/package.json index f3fdf6215f8..68ea7c4398b 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/package.json +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/package.json @@ -13,8 +13,7 @@ "./flue": { "types": "./src/flue.ts", "import": "./dist/flue.js" - }, - "./skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md": "./src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md" + } }, "scripts": { "build": "vite build", diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md index 948de556e99..ed5f2e90cf0 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md @@ -1,236 +1,11 @@ ---- -foo: baz ---- +# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN +Specialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece. -## The Job (plugin) +Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction. -Act as an expert process-model elicitor. Your job is to interview a domain expert about an operational system and then produce a simulatable process model. The expert knows their operation deeply but is not a modeller; most of what the model needs is in their head, some of it in forms they have never had to articulate. +During interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish. -Interview someone who knows an operational system deeply — but is not a modeller — and derive a process model that can be mapped to an SDCPN model and simulated on that basis. +Use mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead. -## How to do it - -### Typologies: kinds of things to ask about - -| Kind | Description | Maps To | -| -------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------- | -| Entity type | A kind of thing that flows through, is operated on, or does the work, including the distinctions the process treats differently and state that rides along. | Colours and typed elements | -| Boundary condition | What the system starts with and what reaches it from outside: initial populations, arrivals and departures, calendars, external inputs, and their reliability. | Scenario initial state and parameters; source transitions | -| Activity | Something that happens, as the expert states it: a work step, setup, repair, inspection, hand-off, or interruption, with its actors, preconditions, outcomes, and duration. | Factored transitions and the places between them | -| Ordering flow | How activities relate: sequence, branching, merging, and triggers. | Arcs, arc types, and guards | -| Policy | The rule applied when more than one thing could happen: who wins a contended resource, what goes next, when to switch, and when to release. | Guards and priorities where compilable; otherwise IR-only | -| Metric | What to measure and how to rate it, including what "better" means and any trade-off weights. | Metrics where scalar over simulation state; weights are IR-only | -| Dynamics | A quantity that evolves continuously while nothing discrete happens, such as wear, temperature, level, or charge. | Differential equations on real-valued colour elements | -| Constraint | A limit that must hold: capacity, eligibility, compatibility, qualification, a regulatory or quality rule, or a conservation law. | Guards and capacities partially; otherwise IR-only | -| Data binding | A model variable that a real data feed could drive. | No current projection | -| Validation criterion | How the expert would know the model is right. | No current projection | - -#### Things that look like kinds and are not - -- __Resource__. A resource (a machine, a team, a vehicle, a bay) is an _Entity Type_ whose instances are contended for. Its contention rule is a _Policy_; its capacity is a _Constraint_; its availability is a _Boundary Condition_. -- __Queue, Buffer Or Waiting State__ — Not elicited as a node. It is implied by the activities on either side of it and emerges as a place in projection. -- __Scenario__. This is assembled at simulation time from _Boundary Condition_ nodes. - -#### Attributes on every kind - -- **quantity**, on any kind — Any duration, rate, probability, count, or capacity. Preserve the value grade the expert reached; the row's demand says what further narrowing completion requires. -- **source-regime** (`prescribed` | `practiced`), on any kind — One model, not two: when the manual and the floor disagree, record both on the same node with the expert's account of when they diverge. Treat the divergence as an ordinary typed conflict to resolve rather than averaging the regimes or choosing one. -- **evidence and precision**, on any value — Track how narrowly a value is stated separately from where it came from. "About three hours" from the expert is honest evidence below the demanded grade; "three hours" supplied by the interviewer may look precise but is not evidence. Neither substitutes for the other. - -#### Aspects of typologies to specifically interrogate - -#### ...about Entity types - -| Aspect | Why | Maps To | -| ----------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------- | -| Distinctions the process treats apart | Two things are one type only if the process treats them the same everywhere | Typed elements | -| State that rides along with each instance | Many types carry no state | Colour elements | -| Number of instances or population shape — range | Unbounded is an allowed answer | Initial populations for contended resources | - -#### ...about Boundary conditions - -| Aspect | Why | Maps To | -| ------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------ | -------------------------- | -| Starting state | Establishes the simulation's initial state | Scenario initial state | -| Arrival or availability pattern | A single average hides the shape | Source rates and calendars | - -#### ...about Activities - -| Aspect | Why | Maps To | -| ------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------ | -| What it needs before it can start | Establishes when the activity can occur | Transition preconditions | -| What it produces or changes | Establishes the activity's effect | Transition outcomes | -| Who or what performs it — named | Some activities are unattended | Resource binding | -| How long it takes — spread | A point value simulates as a falsehood | Duration distribution | -| How often it occurs when it is an event rather than a step — range | Interruptions, failures, and arrivals have a rate; steps in the flow do not | Event occurrence rate | -| What is lost when it changes the system's mode — range | Setup, changeover, restart, and warm-up losses are routinely never asked | Mode-change loss | -| Whether its quantities vary by type — named | The answer is load-bearing either way | Type-dependent transition parameters | - -#### ...about Ordering flows - -| Aspect | Why | Maps To | -| -------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------- | ------------------ | -| The order things happen in | Determines the net's structure | Arcs and arc types | -| How a branch or merge is decided | Routing is required where the flow branches | Guards | - -#### ...about Policies - -| Aspect | Why | Maps To | -| --------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------- | -| The rule as actually practiced | The tacit rule, not the posted rule, determines behavior | Guards and priorities | -| What overrides the practiced rule | Exceptions are where simulation and reality diverge | Guard and priority exceptions where compilable; otherwise IR-only | - -#### ...about Dynamics - -| Aspect | Why | Maps To | -| ---------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------- | -| What changes, in which direction, and at what rate — range | A direction without a rate cannot be simulated | Differential law | -| How the change varies — spread | Noise can dominate threshold timing; deterministic change may explicitly have none | Stochastic dynamics parameters | -| What happens at a threshold | Most continuous quantities exist to trigger something | Guards or transitions triggered by dynamics | - -#### ...about Objectives - -| Aspect | Why | Maps To | -| -------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------- | -| The question, in the expert's words | Everything else is elicited relative to it | Simulation question | -| The nodes it depends on — at least 1 | An objective that depends on nothing is unsupported by the model | Objective dependency slice | -| What "better" means and any trade-off weights — range or spelled out | Quantified objectives need a metric; some objectives are qualitative | Metrics where scalar over simulation state; weights are IR-only | - -#### ...about Constraints - -| Aspect | Why | Maps To | -| ----------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------- | -| The limit and what happens when it is hit | A capacity without a consequence cannot be simulated | Guards and capacities partially; otherwise IR-only | - -#### ...about Data bindings - -| Aspect | Why | Maps To | -| --------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------ | -| The variable and its feed — named | Records the binding so the loss report can name it | IR-only; no current projection | - -#### ...about Validation criteria - -| Aspect | Why | Maps To | -| -------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------- | ------------------------------ | -| How the expert would know the model is right | Anchors the acceptance conversation | IR-only; no current projection | - - -### Cues - -Signals in the expert's words or the interview state. A cue changes what you suspect or attend to; use it to locate a motif or missing aspect before choosing a probe. - -- **Vague language** — "Usually", "roughly", "mostly fine", and "sometimes" signal an unresolved distribution or exception. -- **Normative language** — "We would", "the rule is", and "you are supposed to" report a prescribed policy, not evidence of what happens in practice. -- **Answers in tension** — Something just said does not fit something said earlier, signalling a distinction not yet drawn, a condition not yet named, or an error. -- **Sources in conflict** — Two people or records support claims that cannot both be used without preserving the disagreement. -- **Unexplained terms or documents** — A local term has no expert-authored meaning yet, or a document's proposition has not been related to observed practice. -- **Burden or impatience** — The expert appears pressed, bored, or burdened. This is evidence about the interview, not evidence that the model is complete. -- **A resource named in passing** — A machine, team, vehicle, or bay may be an `entity-type` whose instances are contended for, with an accompanying `policy` and `constraint`. -- **"It depends"** — The unresolved dependency may be a branch in an `ordering/flow`, a deciding `policy`, or a quantity that varies by `entity-type`. -- **"Sometimes it breaks" or "we have to wait for"** — The account may contain an event-shaped `activity` with occurrence and duration, or an uncontrolled `boundary-condition`. -- **Warming up, wearing down, or filling** — The account may contain `dynamics` or a mode change with an unrecorded loss. -- **"Always" or "never"** — The account may contain a `constraint` or `policy` stated in passing. -- **Duration that depends on the clock** — Elapsed time may depend on both the work and a calendar-shaped `boundary-condition`. - -### Motifs - -Recurring structures in an operational system. Recognize a motif to expose its conditional information requirements; derive the model from the expert's account, not from the motif name. - -- **Ask whether, never assemble** — Use a motif as a question: "is there something here that works like ___?" The expert's account supplies the structure; the motif only exposes possible gaps. -- **Name plus variant** — Record both the motif and the axis on which it varies, in the expert's words. Names may be stable while their operational meaning is not. -- **Shared resource** — Several activities want instances of one `entity-type`. Establish whether it is indivisible or splittable by role, how many instances act together, which activity wins, what overrides that rule, how ties break, and a recent borderline case that reveals the practiced policy. A schedule or document alone does not establish that policy. -- **Batch, lot, or load** — An `ordering/flow` moves things in groups. Establish what the group is, its smallest sensible size, whether formation fires by count, clock, or either, whether the group must stay together, and what an extra split costs on the activities it touches. -- **Gate or release** — A `policy` or `boundary-condition` lets something proceed. Establish the practiced event or state that makes it runnable, who or what changes that state, where it is observable, and what overrides it. Resolve time-shaped approximations such as "about two days before" into that practiced condition. -- **Mode change** — An `activity` is a setup, changeover, restart, warm-up, reconfiguration, or handover. Name the transition, establish whether its loss depends on direction or cascades beyond the local activity, and elicit the time, material, or capacity lost as a range. When the value is unknown, record the authoritative source rather than supplying one; an ordinary activity with no mode change may explicitly answer "not applicable". -- **Event, not step** — A failure, interruption, or unplanned arrival befalls the system rather than advancing its normal flow. Establish occurrence as a range and duration as a spread for each named event separately, preserving the grades the expert actually provides, then determine whether the rate changes with a named state. -- **Threshold on a continuous quantity** — A `dynamics` node crosses a consequential boundary. Establish what crossing it triggers, which `activity` resets it, and, when several components evolve, whether they combine additively or the weakest component decides. - -### Probes - -Reusable question forms for resolving one active gap. Choose a probe after identifying what is missing, and apply it to one thread at a time. - -- **Ask for the last occurrence** — Ask "when did that last happen, and what did you do?" A concrete occasion yields sequence, attended cues, and exceptions. Use it instead of a bare "why", which asks the expert to generalise practiced judgment on demand. -- **Ask for the basis** — After a substantive answer, ask "how would you know that — what are you actually looking at?" or "how would this be hard for someone less experienced?" to surface the cues behind the answer. -- **Ground a term or document** — Ask for a local term in the expert's own words. Treat a document as a proposition with provenance and ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation would distinguish the two. -- **Choose mean or tail** — Before eliciting a quantity, ask whether the typical case or the bad case matters to the objective. Use the answer to choose a number, range, or spread. -- **Elicit quantiles** — For a `spread`, ask "typically?", then "one time in ten, worse than?", then "one time in ten, better than?"; median and quartiles are also accepted. A minimum, most likely value, and maximum create a different and often overconfident shape, so clarify whether an offered middle value is a mode or a mean. -- **Clarify until observable** — Ask enough to make the quantity reportable by someone who could see everything without asking what the slot meant. If that observer would need clarification, so does the interview. -- **State the contradiction** — Say "you said earlier that ___, but then you told me ___. How do you explain that?" without choosing between the claims. For conflicting sources, preserve both and ask what observation would distinguish them. -- **Run a premortem** — For something rare or catastrophic, ask the expert to imagine it has already gone wrong: "it is a year from now and this has been the worst month on record; what happened?" Seek mechanism and sequence rather than sentiment. -- **Restate for correction** — Offer "so you are saying that ___?" in your own words, then ask for the expert's settled wording. Bare assent to your phrasing is not their statement. -- **Trade outcomes** — When the expert cannot state an exchange rate between objectives, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one against the other. Vary the pair until the preference boundary is visible rather than requesting an abstract weight. -- **Turn an incident into a rate** — A memorable incident gives consequence and mechanism, not frequency. Ask how many opportunities existed, what period the expert is recalling, and whether the incident was ordinary or exceptional. -- **Turn an unknown into a threshold** — When the expert cannot give an exact quantity, ask what boundary would change a decision or become visibly unacceptable. Record the threshold they can judge without inventing a value beyond it. -- **Ask what is conserved** — When quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant and where loss is possible. Record the answer as a `constraint` in the expert's units. - -### Movements: Slice - -- **One concrete case end to end** — Before sweeping anything, walk one real case from beginning to end — "walk me through one, from when it arrives to when it leaves". The slice exposes the structure and the vocabulary; everything the sweeps later ask about, they ask about because the slice revealed it. -- **Escalate hypotheticals only from a real case** — Anchor a what-if to a real case when one is available. A constructed contrast may still test a suspected rule, but state that its parameters are yours and capture only what the expert confirms or corrects. -- **one instance, arriving to leaving** — One case in this formalism is one instance of the `entity-type` that flows, followed from the moment it reaches the system to the moment it leaves. If several things flow, first ask which unit defines one case — order, batch, item, or another named unit. Create nodes as they appear; as each `objective` becomes clearer, link it to the nodes it depends on. An `objective` that depends on nothing yet is unsupported — say so and go find its structure. - -### Movements: Sweep - -- **One property across one stratum** — A sweep makes one property hold across one class of node the slice revealed — every step has a duration, every resource has a count. Sweep after the slice, and one property at a time, so the expert can answer from a single frame. -- **Ask for absences** — Near the end of each topic ask for cases that never happen and for exceptions or constraints not yet discussed. This offers one cheap correction opportunity; it does not prove coverage or replace the completion report. -- **Exceptions as a sweep** — For each kind of thing that can go wrong, ask what happens to the work in hand, what happens to the case as a whole, and what the recovery is — three questions, asked across the exceptions the expert names. -- **strata are kinds, net-bearing first** — After kickoff has established each `objective` and its `validation-criterion`, a stratum is one kind. Sweep `entity-type` through `dynamics` first because they bear the net, then complete the remaining IR-only rows. -- **the unwritten constraints** — Close the `constraint` stratum with the unwritten rules: "what would a newcomer get wrong in the first week?", "what do you always or never do that is written nowhere?", "which rule exists because something once went wrong?" -- **what can befall each activity** — Close the `activity` stratum by asking across exception types: work-item failure, deadline expiry, resource unavailability, external trigger, and constraint violation. For each named exception, ask what happens to the work, the case, and the recovery. - -### Licenses - -- **Batch breadth, sequence depth** — You may group two to four related survey questions in one turn when they share a frame; probe one thread at a time when deepening. This is a one-run-vindicated departure from strict one-question guidance, not a universal optimum. Five items is a warning; an opening battery is a failure. -- **Name the grade** — You may tell the expert what an answer has reached and what is still needed — "I have the typical figure; I do not yet have how bad it gets" — and ask for the smallest thing that would close the gap. -- **Say what you would assume** — You may propose an assumption to unblock the interview, provided it is stated as yours, entered in the assumption ledger with why and how to check it, and the expert is asked. You may never let it pass into the model as theirs. -- **Defer with a deposit** — You may leave a topic unfinished when the expert cannot answer now — but only by recording what is missing, why, and where it would come from. A deferral without a deposit is a promise, and promises are the failure. -- **Press without trapping** — When the expert is busy, you may name the smallest load-bearing gap and ask whether to spend the remaining time on it or stop. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed. -- **Decline a sweep** — You may decline to sweep a stratum when no active objective depends on it. Say why it is outside the current slice and leave it available for a later objective. -- **Propose structure for correction** — You may offer a low-risk structure as your suggestion when it is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing. Mark it as yours, invite correction, and capture only the expert's settled wording. - -### Smells - -- **A value the expert did not give** — A precise number, category, threshold, or rule appears in what you are about to record and you cannot point to the words it came from. Stop; either find the words or move it to the assumption ledger. -- **Many questions in one turn** — You are about to ask more than four things at once, or anything at all before the first answer has landed. The expert will choose which to answer and silently drop the rest. -- **Fluent and empty** — The conversation reads well and the completion report still lists the same unsatisfied slots it did three turns ago. Fluency is not progress. -- **Assent taken as origin** — The expert agreed to a phrasing that was yours. Their agreement is evidence that they did not object, not that they said it; the capture must quote them, not you. -- **Schema-shaped questioning** — Your questions follow the model's headings or fields instead of the thread the expert is answering. The resulting coverage looks orderly while concrete structure and tacit distinctions remain hidden. -- **Correction recorded twice** — A corrected or sharpened statement is about to be appended beside its earlier form instead of superseding it. The model will treat a correction as two competing facts. -- **A quantity for one type and no other** — A quantity is given for one `entity-type` while other types exist, but whether it varies by type remains unanswered. -- **a continuous quantity that triggers nothing** — a `dynamics` node with no threshold and no consequence usually does not belong in the model. -- **a queue as a node** — a buffer or waiting state elicited as if it were an activity; it is implied and emerges in projection. -- **a policy read off a document** — the rule as posted taken for the rule as practiced; the practiced one is the slot. -- **a point where a spread is demanded** — a single average standing in for a duration or arrival pattern; it simulates as a falsehood. -- **two regimes averaged** — prescribed and practiced blended into one value instead of both recorded on the node. - -### Rabbit holes - -- **Structure before responses** — Asking about how the system is built before knowing what question it must answer produces detail nobody needs. Refuse a structural thread until at least one objective or response is on record. -- **The representation stopped changing** — That the model has stopped growing is not evidence it is complete; it is evidence you have stopped asking. Stop on the demanded slots, never on stability. -- **Depth where nothing depends on it** — A fact earns probing when something the model must answer depends on it. Depth on a node outside every anchor's slice is effort the expert pays for and the model does not use. -- **Clearinghouse as coverage** — Asking what you failed to ask may offer a final correction, but it cannot discover an omission the expert also does not notice. Never use a clearinghouse answer as evidence that coverage is complete. -- **Whole-model restatement as progress** — Repeatedly summarising the whole model during elicitation consumes time without deepening the active thread. Reserve one complete read-back for close; use local restatement for correction. -- **Document treated as practice** — A schedule, procedure, or spreadsheet states one source's claim. Do not take it for the practised rule; confirm when it holds, when it does not, and whose observation would distinguish the two. -- **building the net in conversation** — Places, transitions, arcs, and colours are projection output. Naming them to the expert buys nothing and costs the expert's vocabulary. -- **eliciting queues or scenarios** — Neither is a node. Ask about the activities on either side of a wait; assemble scenarios from `boundary-condition` nodes at simulation time. -- **depth on IR-only kinds** — Establish the `validation-criterion` and accuracy bar at kickoff even though they do not project today. For `data-binding`, stop after the variable, source, and any evidence gap; implementation detail belongs in the loss report. -- **grade finer than what the expert observes** — Do not decompose a quantity below the granularity the expert can observe. Record the coarser value and a deposit naming where finer evidence could come from. -- **eliciting the objective's answer** — The interview builds what the model needs to answer an `objective`; it does not ask the expert to predict that answer and store the prediction as model structure. - -### Failure modes - -- **Silent hardening** — A vague or hedged answer becomes a precise value in the model without a clarification turn. _Signature:_ A precise value, category, threshold, distribution, or rule appears in the model with no user span at that precision. -- **Invented content** — A load-bearing element of the model has no supporting words from the expert. _Signature:_ A model element with no user span and no ledger entry. -- **Never-asked coverage blindness** — A demanded slot is never addressed because nothing prompted the question. _Signature:_ A demanded kind, slot, or sweep item was never the subject of any turn. -- **Opening overload** — The interview opens with a battery of questions. _Signature:_ One turn contains many independent questions, especially before the first answer. -- **Unresolved ambiguity bypass** — A vague term, quantifier, unexplained domain word, or contradiction feeds one precise assertion. _Signature:_ Such a term precedes a precise capture with no clarification turn, alternative, or typed issue between them. -- **Unlicensed influence** — The interviewer supplies an estimate, frames an ungrounded option as established, or treats assent to its own words as the expert's content. _Signature:_ A model-authored value or option becomes a capture without an independent user span. -- **Premature accommodation** — A burden or impatience cue ends the interview while demanded slots remain. _Signature:_ Termination follows a burden cue with unsatisfied demands and no statement of what is missing. -- **Deferral without deposit** — The interviewer names future work or external data as a prerequisite and records nothing. _Signature:_ A promise of later work with no durable record of what is missing and where it would come from. -- **dead net** — the floor catches presence; only the sweep catches an order that was never actually stated. _Signature:_ no `ordering/flow` with its order spelled out; activities exist but nothing connects them -- **unsupported objective** — the model cannot answer the question it was built for; the slice never reached it. _Signature:_ an `objective` whose dependency slot names no node in the model - -### Tips - -Completion is what the **Must know** section defines — the floor, then every node in each objective's dependency slice satisfied at its demanded precision — not a feeling that the conversation is done. +When the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts index ccc5e6ad330..a39883beeb0 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@ import { - type Skill, useInitialData, useInstruction, useSkill, @@ -7,6 +6,11 @@ import { } from "@flue/runtime"; import * as v from "valibot"; +import sdcpnAppend from "./APPEND_SYSTEM.md?raw"; +import { + SDCPN_MODELLING_SKILL_NAME, + sdcpnModellingSkill, +} from "./skills/sdcpn-modelling/skill"; import { petrinautConstructionTools } from "./tools/petrinaut-construction"; import { READ_PETRINAUT_DOC_TOOL_NAME, @@ -24,17 +28,10 @@ export const sdcpnInitialDataSchema = v.optional( export type SdcpnInitialData = v.InferOutput; /** Mount the prompt material, skill, and conditional tools owned by the SDCPN plugin. */ -export function useSdcpnPlugin(sdcpnModellingSkill: Skill): void { +export function useSdcpnPlugin(): void { const initialData = useInitialData(); - useInstruction( - ` -You are eliciting a process model as an SDCPN for the Petrinaut editor. -Activate the \`sdcpn-modelling\` skill before interviewing or constructing a process model. -The Markdown IR is the shared workpiece of one looping lifecycle. -When the user asks how Petrinaut's UI works, call readPetrinautDoc. -`.replace(/^\s+|\s+$/gu, ""), - ); + useInstruction(sdcpnAppend.trim()); useSkill(sdcpnModellingSkill); useTool(readPetrinautDoc); @@ -51,6 +48,7 @@ This is a construct-only headless conversation. Use only the supplied runbook IR } export { READ_PETRINAUT_DOC_TOOL_NAME, readPetrinautDoc }; +export { SDCPN_MODELLING_SKILL_NAME }; export { PETRINAUT_CONSTRUCTION_TOOL_NAMES, petrinautConstructionTools, diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/raw-imports.d.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/raw-imports.d.ts index d6729bb002e..11f9904d995 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/raw-imports.d.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/raw-imports.d.ts @@ -1,4 +1,9 @@ -/** Vite's `?raw` import: the plugin definition ships inside the bundle as a string. */ +/** Vite's `?raw` imports ship authored resources inside the bundle. */ +declare module "*.md?raw" { + const markdown: string; + export default markdown; +} + declare module "*.yaml?raw" { const yaml: string; export default yaml; diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md deleted file mode 100644 index 7cfe680578c..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,33 +0,0 @@ ---- -name: sdcpn-modelling -description: Conduct a process-modelling interview, keep a structured Markdown IR, and construct a validated Petri net the expert can load. Use when someone wants a simulatable process model, a Petri net, or an interview that produces one. ---- - -# Lifecycle - -You own one looping lifecycle. Phases are modes of the same conversation, not handoffs. - -1. **Orient** — establish what the model must answer, for whom, with what time and accuracy, and what sits inside the boundary. -2. **Elicit** — interview in the expert's vocabulary. Read `elicitation.md` before asking substantive questions. Read `ir-template.md` when you first need to start or update the workpiece. -3. **Maintain the IR** — after each useful stretch, update the relevant IR sections. Emit the full current IR in a `runbook-ir` fenced block whenever you substantially change it, and always before construction. -4. **Construct** — only after a recoverable IR exists. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`. Infer the net from the IR, not by rereading the transcript as the primary model. When Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, use them for every net change and inspect the resulting definition instead of emitting net JSON. -5. **Check and deliver** — run the checks. Name inferences, approximations, defaults, omissions, and unrepresentable material. If a check exposes an IR gap, return to elicitation, amend the IR, and reconstruct. - -## Resource routing - -- Elicitation and IR maintenance: `elicitation.md`, `ir-template.md`. -- Construction and delivery: `pn-construction.md`, `checks.md`. -- Do not read construction material to frame ordinary interview questions. -- Do not interview through places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, or firing rules. - -## IR emission - -Whenever you emit the workpiece, use a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. The block is the full current document, not a delta. That block is how the conversation recovers the IR — there is no other store. - -## Return from construction - -If construction or checks show a hole the IR cannot fill, say what is missing, ask the smallest question that would fill it, update the IR, and only then regenerate. Do not invent a workflow engine or wait for a phase command. - -## Partial delivery - -When the expert stops, open no new topic. Deliver the best current IR and, if asked or already possible, the best current net, with gaps and assumptions named. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md index 9ef86854436..69d0845b87f 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md @@ -1,52 +1,116 @@ -# Completion and checks +# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks -provenance: mixed — job/done/check adapted from Jetty; SDCPN validity and loss review from target-formalism teaching. +Read this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. For workpiece-only delivery, apply the universal and plugin Verification registers without loading this construction resource. -## Elicitation sufficiency +A failed check triggers the smallest relevant repair available in the current runtime branch: amend the workpiece, ask during interactive elicitation, revise construction, or report a visible limitation and re-entry question for a later conversation. -Enough for a first construction when: +## Evidence levels -- at least one objective is named in the expert's terms; -- one concrete case has been walked end to end; -- the IR can locate goals, the process boundary, the main activities and their order, and the resources those activities contend for; -- unknowns, assumptions, and omissions are visible rather than silently filled. +Report the highest level actually reached. Passing one level does not imply the next. -Not enough: a fluent conversation, a stable-looking IR with empty demanded sections, or headings filled by your inference without an assumption mark. +### 1. Tool-schema acceptance -## IR checks +The mounted construction tools accepted the submitted payloads, and the latest inspected definition contains the accepted changes. This establishes conformance to those tool input schemas and the shape returned by inspection. It does not establish correspondence with the workpiece, reachability, resource conservation, exclusivity over executions, loadability in another consumer, or simulated behavior. -Before constructing: +### 2. Agent-reviewed structural correspondence -- every section is present; -- no precise quantity or rule appears without either an expert source or an **Assumed** mark; -- conflicts are listed rather than averaged; -- construction could proceed without inventing a missing spine (what flows, what happens to it, in what order). +The agent compared the inspected definition with the workpiece and found visible structures corresponding to the recorded process. This can establish that named elements, connections, candidate paths, guards, resource-return structures, and parameters are present and apparently aligned. It remains a review judgment over static structure, not behavioral proof. -If a check fails, fix the IR or return to elicitation. Three tries, then deliver the partial result and say why. +### 3. Behavioral execution or stronger analysis -## PN validity +An actual simulation, state-space exploration, invariant check, or other named analysis exercised the constructed definition. State exactly which method, scenario, initial state, parameters, paths, and observations were covered. A simulation run establishes only the behavior observed in that run; a universal claim such as “resources cannot leak” requires an analysis whose scope genuinely covers every relevant execution. -Use `getLatestNetDefinition` to inspect the client-owned result. Every change -must have passed the mounted Petrinaut tool schema; correct any rejection -before delivery. Check that the net has at least one place and transition, all -arc weights are positive, shared resources are returned where the IR says they -are reserved rather than consumed, exclusive modes are structurally exclusive, -and the activities have the order the IR claims. Missing canvas positions are -allowed. +If no behavioral execution or stronger analysis occurred, say so. Do not convert tool acceptance or visual inspection into behavioral validation. -A net that cannot run because order was never stated is a failed check, not a styling issue. +## Before construction -## Loss and uncertainty review +- The intended question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms. +- The boundary and a meaningful concrete case are cold-readable from the workpiece. +- The process spine says what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, where waiting comes from, and what outcome or handoff ends it. +- Inputs that matter are distinguished as consumed, reserved/released, or read. +- Required resource availability and release are recorded or visibly unknown. +- Consequential quantities retain their context and supported precision. +- Practiced and prescribed rules, corrections, conflicts, and contextual variants are not silently collapsed. +- Construction can proceed without recovering a load-bearing fact from transcript memory. +- Assumptions, unresolved matters, omissions, and anticipated losses are visible. -The delivery names: +If the missing material admits materially different process structures, formulate the smallest resolving question before constructing. Ask it only during interactive elicitation; in construct-only execution, return it as a blocking re-entry question. If the person has stopped, deliver the partial workpiece instead of opening a new topic. -- inferences and approximations used in construction; -- defaults you introduced; -- omissions the objective permitted; -- material the net cannot hold. +## Tool-schema acceptance checks -Do not silently harden a hedge into a number. +- Every intended construction call was accepted or its rejection remains explicitly unresolved. +- The latest inspected definition contains each accepted place, transition, type, parameter, and connection under the identifier returned or supplied. +- Every referenced endpoint exists in the inspected definition. +- Arc weights or multiplicities are positive and conform to the mounted schema. +- No later step depends on a rejected or absent change. -## Stopping outcomes +Re-inspect after dependent stages and once at the end. Record rejected calls and repairs. Describe this result as **tool-schema accepted**, not valid, runnable, or simulated. -Name one: `complete-enough-to-parse`, `partial-with-named-gaps`, `unsupported-objective`, `expert-stopped`, `returned-to-elicitation`. +## Agent-reviewed structural correspondence + +Compare the latest inspected definition with the authoritative workpiece claims. + +- The definition contains at least one meaningful place and transition corresponding to the process account. +- It contains a candidate structural path from a represented initial or admitted condition toward an outcome. This does not establish that the path can fire. +- Visible branches, joins, loops, and recovery structures correspond to the workpiece's stated ordering and conditions. +- For each enumerated resource-holding path, the intended acquisition and return structures are present. This does not establish conservation over every execution. +- Consumed inputs lack an unintended return structure; reserved inputs have an intended return structure; read-only information remains visibly available by the chosen representation. +- Mutually exclusive outcomes or modes have apparently exclusive guards or structure. This does not establish that they can never overlap at runtime. +- Direction-dependent mode changes retain distinct structural losses where the workpiece requires them. +- Continuous dynamics have a recorded quantity, consequential threshold or effect, and workpiece support. +- Required parameters and initial populations are represented or explicitly named as external inputs. +- Waiting is explained by recorded surrounding conditions rather than an unsupported queue object. + +Record discrepancies and the agent judgment used to resolve or preserve them. Describe a passing result as **structurally reviewed against the workpiece**. + +## Behavioral evidence + +Only report observations produced by an actual execution or named stronger analysis. + +- Record the exact definition revision, scenario, initial state, parameters, duration or stopping condition, and analysis method. +- State which process path or property was exercised. +- For a simulation, report only observed progress, resource balances, mode states, outputs, and failures from the runs performed. +- For state-space or invariant analysis, report the explored scope, assumptions, and any unexamined behaviors. +- Relate each observation back to the workpiece objective it bears on. +- Preserve failures and counterexamples; do not summarize them as a pass because another run succeeded. + +No behavioral tool or result means no behavioral claim. + +## Fidelity and uncertainty + +- Every load-bearing net choice traces to an authoritative workpiece claim or a named construction inference, approximation, or default. +- No hedge has been hardened solely to satisfy a schema. +- No conflict has been averaged and no contextual value has been made universal without an accepted simplification. +- Assumptions state why they were introduced, what they affect, and how they could be checked. +- Material retained only in the workpiece is named as a target or tooling loss rather than omitted silently. +- The delivery distinguishes accepted structure, agent review, observed behavior, and universal guarantees. + +## Revision checks + +When revising an existing workpiece or analyzing a requested net change: + +- the changed or disputed workpiece material is explicit; +- the prior and current account are distinguishable as correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence; +- the desired net delta follows from changed workpiece meaning; +- unsupported update or removal operations are reported rather than imitated with competing additive structure; +- any applied additive net changes preserve the intended existing structure at the level actually inspected; +- assumptions and losses displaced or introduced by the revision are reported; +- the delivery distinguishes what changed from what was only inspected and says what the model can now support that it could not support before, or vice versa. + +## Delivery + +Always deliver the current recoverable workpiece. Deliver a net only if construction occurred through available tools and the resulting definition was inspected. + +State plainly: + +- what question or decision the result is intended to support; +- whether the workpiece is sufficient for that purpose or partial with named gaps; +- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or tool-schema accepted; +- whether an agent-reviewed structural comparison occurred and what discrepancies remain; +- whether behavior was untested, observed in named simulations, or established to the stated scope by stronger analysis; +- what the agent inferred, approximated, defaulted, simplified, or omitted; +- what remains unknown, unasked, declined, deferred, conflicting, or unsupported; +- what the target formalism or current tooling could not represent; +- what smallest next evidence would change the result. + +Do not collapse these levels into “validated,” “correct,” “runnable,” or “simulatable” without naming the evidence that supports that exact claim. Do not convert the delivery descriptions into a closed completion algebra. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/elicitation.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/elicitation.md deleted file mode 100644 index 1100156c9a2..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/elicitation.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,204 +0,0 @@ -# Elicitation teaching - -Merged universal interviewing judgment and SDCPN target-formalism investigation. No concrete plant, fleet, or fab belongs here. - -## Purpose and outcome - -provenance: sdcpn - -Interview someone who knows an operational system and is not a modeller. Derive a process description a simulation can run. The model must answer the questions they actually have, in their vocabulary, with every load-bearing value traceable to something they said or marked assumed. Where their knowledge stops, the IR says so. - -You do not build the net during the interview. - -## Lifecycle and elicitation approach - -### Posture, appetite, budget, boundary, and horizon - -provenance: universal - -From the first exchanges, take time available, what the model is for, how confident it must be, and how far they will tolerate proposed assumptions. These set stance; they are not a form. - -Establish what is inside, what is outside, why that boundary serves the objective, and how far in time the model must remain useful — before asking how the system is built. - -Ask what they may vary, what response decides success, and what observation would make the result accurate enough. - -### Questioning and deepening - -provenance: universal - -- Objectives before structure. A bounded three-to-six-step account begins the slice; do not request a diagram. -- Walk one real case from arrival to leaving before sweeping a property across many cases. -- Prefer "when did that last happen, and what did you do?" to a generalisation. -- Never ask "why do you do it this way?" as the primary probe. Ask for an occasion and what was attended to. -- Vague terms ("usually", "roughly", "mostly fine") hide a distribution or an exception. Deepen before recording. -- Normative language ("we would", "the rule is") is policy, not practice. Ask when that last actually happened. -- After a substantive answer, ask how they would know — what they are actually looking at. -- Before a quantity, ask whether the typical case or the bad one matters. Then typical, then one-in-ten worse, then one-in-ten better. Do not ask min / most-likely / max. -- A memorable incident is not a rate. Ask how many opportunities and over what period. -- Restate in your words for correction; capture their settled wording, not bare assent to yours. -- When two answers tension, say so and ask. Do not pick one silently. -- Batch two to four related survey questions only when they share a frame. Probe one thread when deepening. An opening battery is a failure. - -### Evidence and uncertainty - -provenance: universal - -You may propose an assumption to unblock, stated as yours, entered in the IR with why and how to check. You may never let it pass as theirs. - -You may defer a topic only by recording what is missing, why, and where it would come from. - -A value the expert did not give must not appear as theirs. Find the words, mark it assumed, or drop it. - -### Prioritization and return paths - -provenance: universal - -Walk one case, then ask one property across what that case revealed. Return to a new case when a sweep exposes one the first slice missed. - -When several turns produce nothing new, change technique — a story, a contrast, absences — rather than more of the same. - -Depth is objective-relative. Do not probe a thread that no stated question depends on. - -When appetite is high, follow the slice. When time is tight, synthesise and invite correction. - -### Stopping and partial delivery - -provenance: universal - -Before delivering, summarise, state what is missing or assumed, and give one chance to correct. Do not end because they seem busy; name what is still missing and let them choose. When they stop, open no new topic. - -A fluent conversation is not completion. - -## What to investigate - -provenance: sdcpn — situation typologies, not a questionnaire to read aloud. - -### Goals, constraints, measures, and thresholds - -What the process seeks to achieve or avoid; how each is measured; what factors affect whether they are reached; numerical thresholds they can actually judge (desired or tolerated probability, quantities to keep above or below). - -### Process boundary, triggers, and prerequisites - -What starts a case: schedule, receipt, threshold crossing, or event. What else is required — instructions, approval, a resource being free. - -### Participants, locations, and resources - -Who is involved and what they decide. Which places matter and how they relate. Which resources are capped. Properties that change what the process does. - -A machine, team, or bay named in passing is often a contended resource whose rule the expert has least examined. - -### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource usage - -For each discrete step, in their words: inputs and whether each is consumed, reserved and later released, or only read; whether the step takes time; whether it can fail and what happens then. - -### Flow, branching, retries, failures, and recovery - -How steps relate. Unhappy paths and the conditions that enter them. What happens to the work in hand, to the case, and what recovery looks like. - -### Time, quantities, and stochastic behavior - -Durations, rates, arrivals, scrap, queues implied by waiting. Typical versus tail. Whether a quantity varies by type of thing. - -### Policies, exceptions, and practiced rules - -Who wins a contended resource. What a document says versus what people do. Unwritten rules: what a newcomer gets wrong; what is always or never done that is written nowhere. - -### Validation criteria - -What observation or replay would make the result accurate enough. Do not ask the expert to predict the model's answer and store that prediction as structure. - -## Operational-process and SDCPN guidance - -### Lenses - -provenance: sdcpn, kinds stripped - -- **"It depends"** hides a branch, a decision rule, or a quantity that varies by type. Ask which. -- **"Sometimes it breaks" / "we have to wait"** is an event with a rate and a duration, or an input the system does not control. First accounts omit both. -- Warming up, wearing down, filling: something changing while nothing discrete happens, or a mode change with a loss. Ask the rate or the threshold that matters. -- **"Always" and "never"** are constraints or policies. Ask what enforces them and whether an exception has overridden them. -- A duration that crosses a calendar boundary depends on availability, not only on the work. - -### Situation typologies - -Each pattern below is a question shape, not a node type to assign. - -#### Timed work - -- Notice when: a step takes time, or time is what the objective cares about. -- Information needed: start, finish, what is occupied while it runs, typical duration and a tail if the tail matters. -- Questions that may help: last time it ran; how long it usually takes; one time in ten, worse than. -- Record in the IR: under activities and under time. -- Transform to PN: when constructing, a start / in-progress / done shape. Not during the interview. -- Caveats: do not force a distribution the expert cannot observe. -- Checks: duration has a source or an assumption mark. - -#### Probabilistic or branching outcome - -- Notice when: success is not guaranteed, or two different next steps can follow. -- Information needed: what decides the branch; roughly how often; what each path produces. -- Questions that may help: last failure; what you do then; is that rare or ordinary. -- Record in the IR: flow / failures / recovery. -- Transform to PN: alternative outgoing paths. Not during the interview. -- Caveats: one vivid incident is not a probability. -- Checks: both paths named, or the missing one marked unknown. - -#### Contended resource - -- Notice when: two bits of work want the same people, machine, or bay. -- Information needed: how many instances; who wins; what overrides; a recent borderline case. -- Questions that may help: what happens when two lines want the crew at once. -- Record in the IR: resources and policies. -- Transform to PN: a shared token or equivalent. Not during the interview. -- Caveats: do not infer the rule from a schedule. -- Checks: the practiced rule is recorded, or marked unknown. - -#### Threshold trigger - -- Notice when: something proceeds because a level, count, or clock crossed a line. -- Information needed: the observable; who or what flips it; what it starts or stops. -- Questions that may help: what do you actually look at; what would be unacceptable. -- Record in the IR: triggers and thresholds. -- Transform to PN: a guard or a continuous variable with a crossing. Not during the interview. -- Caveats: a continuous quantity that triggers nothing usually does not belong. -- Checks: the trigger is observable in their world. - -#### Mode change - -- Notice when: setup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover. -- Information needed: what is lost in the change; whether loss depends on direction. -- Questions that may help: last changeover; what you cannot run next. -- Record in the IR: activities and policies. -- Transform to PN: a timed or costly transition between modes. -- Caveats: ask before recording "not applicable". -- Checks: loss components named or marked unknown. - -#### Grouped movement - -- Notice when: work moves in batches, runs, lots, or loads. -- Information needed: what the group is; whether it must stay together; what a split costs. -- Record in the IR: flow and policies. - -### Caveats and rabbit holes - -provenance: mixed - -- Schema-shaped questioning: following IR headings instead of their thread. Coverage looks orderly; tacit distinctions stay hidden. -- Building the net in conversation. Places and transitions buy nothing and cost their vocabulary. -- Structure before any objective is on record. -- Treating a document as practice. -- Whole-model restatement as progress. Local restatement for correction; one read-back at close. -- Asking them to invent weights they do not use. - -### Failure modes - -provenance: universal - -- Silent hardening: a hedge becomes a precise value without a clarification turn. -- Invented content: a load-bearing element with no words from them and no assumption mark. -- Never-asked coverage blindness: a needed topic never addressed. -- Opening overload. -- Unresolved ambiguity bypassed into one precise claim. -- Unlicensed influence: assent to your phrasing treated as their content. -- Premature accommodation: a burden cue ends the interview with holes unnamed. -- Deferral without a deposit. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5bc7ef16ece --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ +# Capability-aware lifecycle + +Use one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred. + +## Select the runtime branch + +### Interactive elicitation, review, or revision + +Interview in the person's operational vocabulary. Before substantive +elicitation or workpiece revision, read +`references/universal-elicitation.md` and `references/profile.md`. + +For review, first inspect the supplied workpiece or model. If it already answers +the question, answer without reading the elicitation references or interviewing. +If the review exposes a gap that requires human knowledge, read both elicitation +references and then ask exactly one focused question that resolves the smallest +consequential gap. + +Read `templates/workpiece.md` only when first creating or materially revising +the workpiece. Do not load the template merely to inspect an existing artifact, +answer a resolvable review question, or frame the first elicitation question. +Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in +this conversation. + +### Construct-only execution + +Use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. +Read `references/pn-construction.md` and `references/checks.md`, then use the +mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful +construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive +elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation. + +## Procedure + +### Orient + +Establish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins. + +### Elicit or revise + +For a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order. + +### Maintain the workpiece + +Treat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it. + +Whenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece. + +### Construct + +Construct only from the current workpiece. Read +`references/pn-construction.md` and `references/checks.md` before beginning. +Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting +definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are +absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes. + +Construction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece. + +### Check and deliver + +Apply `references/checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. +Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the +mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can +support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target +or current tools could not represent. + +An explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview. + +## Resource discipline + +Read resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/ir-template.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/ir-template.md deleted file mode 100644 index 4a5ec6be938..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/ir-template.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,75 +0,0 @@ -# Runbook IR template - -provenance: mixed — section homes are structural; contents stay prose. - -This is the workpiece. Fill it during elicitation. Construction consumes this document, not the transcript. Update one section without rewriting the whole file when you can; when you emit, emit the full current document. - -Do not read these headings aloud as a questionnaire. Follow the expert's thread; file what you learn here. - -Mark every unsettled item in place: - -- **Unknown** — asked, the expert does not know. -- **Not yet asked** — relevant, not yet reached. -- **Assumed** — you supplied it; say why and how to check. -- **Conflict** — two accounts disagree; keep both. -- **Omitted** — deliberately left out, and why the objective permits it. -- **Loss** — something the net cannot represent. - -```markdown -# Runbook IR - -## Purpose and outcome - -### What the model must answer - -### Who it is for - -### What it must not claim - -## Posture - -### Appetite, time, and accuracy - -### Boundary and horizon - -## Goals, constraints, measures, and thresholds - -## Process boundary, triggers, and prerequisites - -## Participants, locations, and resources - -## Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource usage - -## Flow, branching, retries, failures, and recovery - -## Time, quantities, and stochastic behavior - -## Policies, exceptions, and practiced rules - -## Validation criteria - -## Situation notes - -Repeat as needed. Each note: - -### - -#### Notice when - -#### What we know - -#### Open questions - -#### Record for construction - -## Unknowns, assumptions, conflicts, and omissions - -## Projection losses -``` - -## Maintenance - -- Prefer the expert's words for names of things. -- A restatement you offered is not their statement until they settle the wording. -- When a later answer corrects an earlier one, replace the earlier content and note the supersession in the conflicts/omissions section rather than leaving two competing facts in the same heading. -- Empty sections stay present with `Not yet asked` or `Omitted` so construction can see the hole. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md index a983ebb0291..6f2dcb443fb 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md @@ -1,93 +1,127 @@ -# PN construction +# SDCPN Construction -provenance: sdcpn +Read this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model. -Read this only when constructing or checking a net. Consume the filled runbook IR. Do not treat the transcript as the primary model. +Construction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete. + +## Construction boundary + +Before constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case. + +If materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path. + +When Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net. ## Mapping principles -- Things that wait, hold, or are available become places. -- Things that happen become transitions. -- Order, branching, and triggers become arcs and, where needed, guards. -- A type of thing the process treats differently may become a colour; only when the IR says the distinction changes what happens. -- Continuous change while nothing discrete happens may become dynamics on a place. -- Shared resources become tokens that are reserved and released, not consumed for good, unless the IR says they are used up. +| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation | +| --- | --- | +| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior | +| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable | +| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it | +| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes | +| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state | +| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior | +| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential | +| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece | +| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them | + +A physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node. -Missing canvas positions are acceptable. Prefer a net the parser accepts over a pretty layout. +## Petrinaut tool sequence -When Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their generated schemas are the -only authority for payload fields: +When the corresponding tools are mounted: -1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before constructing. -2. Add only IR-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and - `addParameter`. -3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`. Establish - their stable IDs before connecting them. -4. Add every connection with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token - multiplicities; a zero-weight branch is not an exclusive mode. -5. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and once at the end. - Correct rejected calls in the same conversation. +1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net. +2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`. +3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them. +4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes. +5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end. +6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial. -Do not emit a `pn-json` block or reproduce the resulting definition as -free-form JSON. The validated tool calls and the client's final definition are -the construction artifact. +The mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields. -Name every inference. If the IR does not support a place, transition, or arc, do not invent a silent default — omit it and list the loss, or mark the default in the delivery. +## Construction patterns -## Reusable construction patterns +Patterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts. ### Timed work -When the IR records a step that occupies time: +When a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail. -1. A start transition that may sample duration onto a token field. -2. An in-progress place (dynamics may count down remaining time). -3. A done transition that waits until remaining time is gone. +### Conditional or probabilistic outcome -If the IR only has a typical duration and no tail, keep a constant or a named parameter and say so. +Represent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap. -### Branching or probabilistic outcome +### Contended resource -A start that records a sampled or decided outcome; then two (or more) completions with exclusive conditions. If the IR has no rate, do not invent 50/50 — use a named parameter or omit the probability and list the loss. +Hold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return. -### Contended resource +Compile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded. + +### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs + +- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records. +- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release. +- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work. -A place holding the free instances. The work's start consumes (reserves) one; the work's end returns it, possibly worn. The practiced contention rule becomes a guard or a priority if the IR stated one; otherwise name the missing rule as a loss. +Confirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning. -### Threshold trigger +### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite -A place carrying the quantity; a transition that fires when the IR's observable is crossed; another that resets it if the IR named a reset. If nothing is triggered, do not add a floating continuous variable. +Represent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate. + +### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement + +Represent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum. ### Mode change -A transition between two availability or setup places. Put directional loss on that transition if the IR recorded it. +Represent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs. + +### Event, failure, retry, and recovery + +Represent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset. + +### Continuous quantity and threshold + +Carry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior. + +### Spatial transfer + +Represent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported. -### Grouped movement +### Hidden waiting -A formation transition that waits for a count or a clock; a place for the formed group; a split cost if the IR said splitting is expensive. +Derive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object. -## Inference and approximation +## Inference, approximation, and target loss -Allowed if named: +Name every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece. -- collapsing several named micro-steps into one transition when the objective does not depend on the internals; -- treating an unstated return of a reserved resource as "released as it arrived"; -- using a parameter for an unknown rate. +Potentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible: -Not allowed: +- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order; +- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value; +- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose; +- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and +- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning. -- filling an empty IR section from general knowledge of plants or logistics; -- averaging two conflicting accounts; -- turning "unknown" into a typical textbook distribution. +Not acceptable: -## Projection loss +- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge; +- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values; +- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution; +- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior; +- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or +- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence. -The net cannot honestly hold: qualitative objectives without a metric, unwritten political weights, data bindings not yet connected, and any practiced rule whose condition the expert could not name. Keep those in the IR's loss section and name them in the construction delivery. +Record workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification. -## Worked examples +## Existing-net analysis and bounded change -Typology-shaped only. +Start from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta. -**Timed work, no plant.** IR says "inspection takes about twenty minutes, sometimes an hour if the lab is backed up." Construction: start / in-progress / finish; duration a spread or a typical-plus-tail parameter; lab backup named as a contended resource if the IR recorded the lab, otherwise a loss. +Do not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones. -**Contended crew.** IR says two jobs can want the same two-person crew, and when that happens one waits. Construction: a place with two tokens; both job-starts reserve; no invented priority if none was stated. +After a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..03f52743f82 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md @@ -0,0 +1,222 @@ +# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation + +This reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance. + +The registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary. + +## Directives + +### Build the operational account the purpose needs + +For the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use. + +Every objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure. + +### Keep target structure backstage + +Ask about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions. + +### Preserve operational context + +A value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter. + +### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses + +Recurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary. + +## Recognition + +Recognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread. + +### Language and account signals + +- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource. +- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input. +- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception. +- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change. +- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone. +- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context. +- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity. + +### Operational situation patterns + +#### Timed work + +An activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability. + +#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome + +An activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows. + +#### Contended resource + +Several activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return. + +#### Consumed, reserved, or read input + +An activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities. + +#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite + +Work becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it. + +#### Continuous quantity and threshold + +A level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior. + +#### Mode change + +Setup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity. + +#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement + +Work moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group. + +#### Spatial transfer + +A change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary. + +#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery + +A disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome. + +#### Policy under pressure + +More than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule. + +#### Hidden waiting + +A gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node. + +## Operations + +Use the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns. + +### Choose the case unit before slicing + +When several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff. + +### Link the slice to the objective + +As the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail. + +### Expose the process spine + +Ask what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine. + +### Sweep operational concerns, not headings + +After a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality. + +### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs + +For each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns. + +### Sweep what can befall an activity + +Across the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery. + +### Test practiced policy with a borderline case + +When a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule. + +### Close a resource account + +For a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability. + +### Close a mode change in both directions + +Ask whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does. + +### Turn waiting into a causal question + +Ask what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity. + +### Ask what is conserved + +When quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it. + +### Establish retry scope + +Ask whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset. + +### Establish validation from observable behavior + +Ask what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests. + +## Coverage + +Coverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories. + +### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds + +Preserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights. + +### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions + +Preserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential. + +### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources + +Preserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior. + +### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use + +For each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation. + +### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery + +Preserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes. + +### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior + +Preserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports. + +### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes + +Preserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds. + +### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings + +Preserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable. + +### Things not independently elicited as target nodes + +- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure. +- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time. +- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape. +- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. + +## Verification + +Apply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`. + +### Purpose and process + +- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms. +- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported. +- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff. + +### Operational semantics + +- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. +- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required. +- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential. +- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue. +- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ. + +### Quantities and context + +- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it. +- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named. +- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value. + +### Failure signals and repairs + +- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it. +- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question. +- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage. +- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation. +- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context. +- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies. +- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ac7dc5f9ab6 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ +import { defineSkill } from "@flue/runtime"; + +import { universalElicitationReference } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent/flue"; + +import checks from "./checks.md?raw"; +import instructions from "./instructions.md?raw"; +import pnConstruction from "./pn-construction.md?raw"; +import profile from "./profile.md?raw"; +import workpieceTemplate from "./workpiece-template.md?raw"; + +export const SDCPN_MODELLING_SKILL_NAME = "sdcpn-modelling"; + +/** One job skill composed from separately authored core and plugin resources. */ +export const sdcpnModellingSkill = defineSkill({ + name: SDCPN_MODELLING_SKILL_NAME, + description: + "Elicit, review, or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct an inspected SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for process-modelling interviews, Petri nets, and analysis or revision of either artifact.", + instructions, + files: { + "references/checks.md": checks, + "references/pn-construction.md": pnConstruction, + "references/profile.md": profile, + "references/universal-elicitation.md": universalElicitationReference, + "templates/workpiece.md": workpieceTemplate, + }, +}); diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..f5b27c5bd13 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ +# Process-Model Workpiece Template + +This domain-primary workpiece is maintained during elicitation and revision and consumed during construction. It is structurally organized but not a closed semantic claim system. Follow the person's thread during the conversation; do not read these headings aloud as a questionnaire. + +## Locality rule + +Every operational claim has one authoritative home under the relevant purpose or operational concern. Keep exact expert wording, normalized interpretation, agent inference, uncertainty, assumptions, corrections, conflicts, and contextual variation beside that claim when those distinctions matter. Do not repeat the claim in a centralized evidence section or ledger. + +Labels such as **Expert evidence**, **Working account**, **Agent inference**, **Assumed**, **Unknown**, **Not yet asked**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, **Conflict**, **Correction**, **Contextual variation**, **Omitted**, and **Loss** are optional annotations, not mandatory fields or a closed type system. An assumption states why it was introduced and how it could be checked. A correction identifies the account it replaces without leaving both active. Contextual coexistence keeps each account beside the condition selecting it. + +Use the cross-cutting issue ledger only when an unresolved matter affects several authoritative claims or needs a later return path. Ledger entries reference those claims; they do not summarize them again. + +Whenever this workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit the full latest document again before a construction handoff and before workpiece-only delivery. + +```markdown +# Process-Model Workpiece + +## Purpose and posture + +### What the model must answer, compare, or support + +### Who will use it and how + +### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation + +### Available time and assumption appetite + +### What the result must not claim + +## Operational account + +These are filing homes, not interview order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose; keep a consequential omission visible. Place each operational claim once and attach evidence or epistemic annotations at that location when needed. + +### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds + +### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state + +### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources + +### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use + +For each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; put its place in the ordered case only in the process-spine section below. + +### Case and process spine: flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery + +Give the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary. Begin with a concrete case: what admits it to the process, what flows, which named activities occur and in what order, what decisions or conditions change the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the case, and what outcome or handoff ends it. Reference activity and resource entries instead of restating their local details. + +#### Primary case: + +##### Trigger or admission + +##### Ordered account and references + +##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes + +##### Objective dependencies + +#### Additional or contrasting case: + +Add only when a different case exposes structure the primary case does not. + +### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior + +### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes + +### Validation evidence and data sources + +## Cross-cutting issue ledger + +Use only for an unresolved matter that affects several concerns or needs later re-entry. In one compact entry, reference the authoritative claim locations, state what remains unresolved and what it prevents, and name the evidence or event that would re-enter it. Do not copy the affected claims here. + +- **** — affects: ; unresolved: ; consequence: ; re-enter when: . + +## Construction notes + +Open this section when construction begins; do not use it to script ordinary elicitation. Reference authoritative workpiece claims rather than reproducing them. + +### Candidate target structures + +### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults + +### Questions reopened by construction + +### Target-representation losses + +## Delivery status + +Summarize status by reference to the authoritative account and issue ledger; do not create a second model summary. + +### What this workpiece currently supports + +### Consequential gaps + +### Net status + +State whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or tool-schema accepted; whether the inspected definition was structurally reviewed against the workpiece; and whether behavior was untested, observed in named simulations, or established to a stated scope by stronger analysis. Do not infer a higher level from a lower one. +``` + +## Maintenance guidance + +- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions. +- Update the claim at its authoritative location when understanding changes; do not append a competing summary elsewhere. +- Keep evidence and epistemic treatment local even when a cross-cutting issue references the claim. +- Update the authoritative case-and-process-spine section when ordering or case behavior changes; reference local activity and resource claims rather than repeating them. +- Empty sections may be removed when irrelevant. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, or **Omitted** only when that state itself matters to later work. +- Construction consumes this workpiece. If construction needs transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that point. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/test/sdcpn-modelling-skill.test.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/test/sdcpn-modelling-skill.test.ts index 224a52c4eaf..976b9f3e241 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/test/sdcpn-modelling-skill.test.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/test/sdcpn-modelling-skill.test.ts @@ -7,8 +7,9 @@ const skillDirectory = new URL( import.meta.url, ); const resourceFiles = [ - "elicitation.md", - "ir-template.md", + "instructions.md", + "profile.md", + "workpiece-template.md", "pn-construction.md", "checks.md", ] as const; @@ -17,22 +18,48 @@ const readSkillFile = (fileName: string): string => readFileSync(new URL(fileName, skillDirectory), "utf8"); describe("the authored sdcpn-modelling skill", () => { - test("has spec-valid routing frontmatter and four supporting resources", () => { - const skill = readSkillFile("SKILL.md"); - expect(skill).toMatch(/^---\nname: sdcpn-modelling\n/u); - expect(skill).toMatch(/^description: .+Use when .+\n/mu); - expect(skill).toContain("# Lifecycle"); - expect(resourceFiles.map(readSkillFile)).toHaveLength(4); + test("assembles one job skill from core and plugin-authored resources", () => { + const skillModule = readSkillFile("skill.ts"); + expect(skillModule).toContain("defineSkill"); + expect(skillModule).toContain("universalElicitationReference"); + expect(skillModule).toContain('"references/universal-elicitation.md"'); + expect(resourceFiles.map(readSkillFile)).toHaveLength(5); }); test("keeps reusable teaching separate from the scenario and payload contract", () => { - const elicitation = readSkillFile("elicitation.md"); + const instructions = readSkillFile("instructions.md"); + const profile = readSkillFile("profile.md"); + const workpiece = readSkillFile("workpiece-template.md"); const construction = readSkillFile("pn-construction.md"); - expect(elicitation).toContain("provenance: universal"); - expect(elicitation).not.toMatch(/Vestera|truck fleet|semiconductor/iu); - expect(construction).toContain("Timed work"); + const checks = readSkillFile("checks.md"); + expect(instructions).toMatch(/ask exactly one focused question/u); + expect(instructions).toMatch( + /Read `templates\/workpiece\.md` only when first creating or materially revising\s+the workpiece/u, + ); + expect(instructions).toMatch( + /If it already answers\s+the question, answer without reading the elicitation references or interviewing/u, + ); + expect(profile).not.toMatch(/Vestera|truck fleet|semiconductor/iu); + expect(workpiece).toContain( + "Every operational claim has one authoritative home", + ); + expect(construction).toContain("Petrinaut tool sequence"); + expect(checks).toContain("Tool-schema acceptance"); + expect(checks).toContain("Agent-reviewed structural correspondence"); + expect(checks).toContain("Behavioral execution or stronger analysis"); expect(construction).toContain("getLatestNetDefinition"); expect(construction).not.toContain("```json"); expect(construction).not.toContain("```pn-json"); }); + + test("routes elicitation, review, revision, and construction through the job skill", () => { + const append = readFileSync( + new URL("../src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md", import.meta.url), + "utf8", + ); + expect(append).toContain( + "substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction", + ); + expect(append).toContain("Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill"); + }); }); From 702027b54486cc421ad070c98994adc39ffe83ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 13:41:27 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 040/101] Narrow Mission 4 scoring to the flat-prompt control Preserve the aborted operational campaign and freeze a clean architecture-quality comparison against only the latest valid baseline workpieces. Co-authored-by: Cursor --- apps/brunch-agent/package.json | 1 + .../runbook/prospective-runbook-v3-run.ts | 874 ++++++++++++++++++ .../test/prospective-runbook-v3.test.ts | 100 ++ libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md | 7 +- .../campaign-abort.md | 17 + ...-26-30-977Z-8edb4225.failure-46b787ce.json | 162 ++++ ...-32-08-894Z-7afbec23.failure-79bae3d9.json | 452 +++++++++ .../prospective-runbook-v2/protocol.md | 4 +- .../prospective-runbook-v3/protocol.md | 87 ++ 9 files changed, 1700 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) create mode 100644 apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v3-run.ts create mode 100644 apps/brunch-agent/test/prospective-runbook-v3.test.ts create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-candidate-v2/campaign-abort.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-candidate-v2/prospective-runbook-v2-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-26-30-977Z-8edb4225.failure-46b787ce.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-candidate-v2/prospective-runbook-v2-replication-2-2026-09-02T11-32-08-894Z-7afbec23.failure-79bae3d9.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v3/protocol.md diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/package.json b/apps/brunch-agent/package.json index 0c1d9394b9d..c67ad08d034 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/package.json +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/package.json @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ "lint:tsc": "tsgo --noEmit", "petrinaut:dev": "vite dev --config petrinaut-local.vite.config.ts", "runbook:elicit": "vite build && node --experimental-strip-types src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts", + "runbook:elicit:architecture-v3": "vite build && node --experimental-strip-types src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v3-run.ts", "runbook:elicit:candidate-v2": "vite build && node --experimental-strip-types src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v2-run.ts", "runbook:headless": "vite build && node --experimental-strip-types src/evaluations/runbook/construction-run.ts", "test:unit": "vitest run --config vitest.config.ts", diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v3-run.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v3-run.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..4128f5aebda --- /dev/null +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v3-run.ts @@ -0,0 +1,874 @@ +/** + * Mission 4 architecture scoring campaign. + * + * This is intentionally separate from the immutable flat-prompt control and + * the aborted v2 operational campaign. + * Build first, then run one explicitly numbered replication: + * BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_REPLICATION=1 \ + * yarn workspace @apps/brunch-agent runbook:elicit:architecture-v3 + */ + +import { execFile } from "node:child_process"; +import { randomUUID } from "node:crypto"; +import { mkdir, readFile, readdir, rm, writeFile } from "node:fs/promises"; +import { tmpdir } from "node:os"; +import { basename, join } from "node:path"; +import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url"; +import { promisify } from "node:util"; + +import { observe, setProvider } from "@flue/runtime"; +import { createFlueClient } from "@flue/sdk"; + +import { + agentOwnershipHeaders, + flueConversationIdFrom, +} from "../../conversation/identity.ts"; +import { formatFlueTranscript } from "../../conversation/transcript.ts"; +import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE } from "../../http/routes.ts"; +import { + interviewerToolNamesFrom, + ordinaryElicitationViolationsFrom, + recoverRunbookWorkpiece, + skillResourcePathsFrom, +} from "./artifacts.ts"; +import { + assertApprovedHermeticModelModules, + builtServerArtifactManifest, + canonicalPath, + rejectImmutableBaselineOutput, + sha256, +} from "./campaign-integrity.ts"; +import { + type BuiltBrunchApplication, + loadBuiltBrunchApplication, +} from "./load-built-application.ts"; + +import type Anthropic from "@anthropic-ai/sdk"; +import type { Provider } from "@earendil-works/pi-ai"; +import type { FlueConversationSnapshot } from "@flue/sdk"; + +const PROTOCOL_ID = "prospective-runbook-v3"; +const OUTPUT_NAMESPACE_ID = "vestera-architecture-candidate-v3"; +const COMPARISON_TARGET = { + protocolId: "prospective-runbook-v1", + outputNamespaceId: "vestera-prospective-baseline-v1", + memberRunIds: [ + "runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-50-28-709Z-20a4817f", + "runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-56-34-754Z-4b75737c", + ], + qualityPopulation: "valid-workpieces", + runtimeAccounting: "reported-separately", +} as const; +const FROZEN_MODEL = "claude-sonnet-4-5"; +const FROZEN_HARD_STOP = 8; +const FROZEN_LATENCY_STOP_MS = 180_000; +const FROZEN_REPLICATIONS = 3; + +process.env["BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL"] ??= FROZEN_MODEL; + +const execFileAsync = promisify(execFile); +const repositoryRoot = new URL("../../../../../", import.meta.url); +const repositoryRootPath = fileURLToPath(repositoryRoot); +const evaluationRoot = new URL( + "../../../../../libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/", + import.meta.url, +); +const caseDirectory = new URL("cases/vestera-scheduling/", evaluationRoot); +const candidateOutputDirectory = fileURLToPath( + new URL( + "../../../../../libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/", + import.meta.url, + ), +); +const immutableBaselineDirectory = fileURLToPath( + new URL( + "../../../../../libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/", + import.meta.url, + ), +); + +const interviewerModel = process.env["BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL"]; +const expertModel = process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_EXPERT_MODEL"] ?? FROZEN_MODEL; +const hardStop = Number( + process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_HARD_STOP"] ?? `${FROZEN_HARD_STOP}`, +); +const latencyStopMs = Number( + process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_LATENCY_STOP_MS"] ?? `${FROZEN_LATENCY_STOP_MS}`, +); +const replication = Number(process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_REPLICATION"] ?? "0"); +const outputDirectory = await rejectImmutableBaselineOutput( + process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_OUTPUT_DIR"] ?? candidateOutputDirectory, + immutableBaselineDirectory, +); +const canonicalCandidateOutputDirectory = await canonicalPath( + candidateOutputDirectory, +); +const expertClientModule = process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ANTHROPIC_MODULE"]; +const interviewerProviderModule = + process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_INTERVIEWER_PROVIDER_MODULE"]; +const allowDirtyInstrument = + process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ALLOW_DIRTY_INSTRUMENT"] === "1"; +const apiKey = process.env["ANTHROPIC_API_KEY"]; + +if (!Number.isSafeInteger(hardStop) || hardStop < 1) { + throw new Error("BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_HARD_STOP must be a positive integer"); +} +if (!Number.isFinite(latencyStopMs) || latencyStopMs <= 0) { + throw new Error("BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_LATENCY_STOP_MS must be positive"); +} +if ( + !Number.isSafeInteger(replication) || + replication < 1 || + replication > FROZEN_REPLICATIONS +) { + throw new Error( + `BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_REPLICATION must be one of 1, 2, or ${FROZEN_REPLICATIONS}`, + ); +} + +const hasExpertOverride = expertClientModule !== undefined; +const hasInterviewerOverride = interviewerProviderModule !== undefined; +if (hasExpertOverride !== hasInterviewerOverride) { + throw new Error( + "Hermetic runs must set both test-only model module overrides; paid runs must set neither.", + ); +} +const isHermeticRun = hasExpertOverride && hasInterviewerOverride; +const usesFrozenConfiguration = + interviewerModel === FROZEN_MODEL && + expertModel === FROZEN_MODEL && + hardStop === FROZEN_HARD_STOP && + latencyStopMs === FROZEN_LATENCY_STOP_MS; + +if (isHermeticRun) { + await assertApprovedHermeticModelModules(repositoryRootPath, { + expert: expertClientModule, + interviewer: interviewerProviderModule, + }); + if (outputDirectory === canonicalCandidateOutputDirectory) { + throw new Error( + "Hermetic runs cannot write to vestera-architecture-candidate-v3.", + ); + } + if (apiKey) { + throw new Error("Hermetic runs must not receive ANTHROPIC_API_KEY."); + } +} else { + if (!apiKey) { + throw new Error("ANTHROPIC_API_KEY is required for a paid candidate run."); + } + if (outputDirectory !== canonicalCandidateOutputDirectory) { + throw new Error( + "Paid candidate runs must write to vestera-architecture-candidate-v3.", + ); + } + if (!usesFrozenConfiguration) { + throw new Error( + "Paid candidate runs require the frozen prospective-runbook-v3 model, turn, and latency configuration.", + ); + } + if (allowDirtyInstrument) { + throw new Error( + "Paid candidate runs cannot use BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ALLOW_DIRTY_INSTRUMENT.", + ); + } +} + +const instrumentFiles = [ + "yarn.lock", + "apps/brunch-agent/package.json", + "apps/brunch-agent/vite.config.ts", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/app.ts", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/db.ts", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/ping.ts", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/identity.ts", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/transcript.ts", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/http/routes.ts", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/artifacts.ts", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/campaign-integrity.ts", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/load-built-application.ts", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v3-run.ts", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/package.json", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/universal-elicitation.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/package.json", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/opening-message.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/situation-pack.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/vestera-scheduling/truth-ledger-v1-prospective.yaml", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/ir-quality-ruler-v1.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1/omniscient-grader.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1/cold-ir-reviewer.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v3/protocol.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-50-28-709Z-20a4817f.ir.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-50-28-709Z-20a4817f.omniscient.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-50-28-709Z-20a4817f.cold.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-56-34-754Z-4b75737c.ir.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-56-34-754Z-4b75737c.omniscient.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-56-34-754Z-4b75737c.cold.md", +] as const; + +const hashedInstrumentFiles = await Promise.all( + instrumentFiles.map(async (path) => ({ + path, + hash: sha256(await readFile(new URL(path, repositoryRoot))), + })), +); +const fileSha256: Record = {}; +for (const file of hashedInstrumentFiles) { + fileSha256[file.path] = file.hash; +} + +const { stdout: commitOutput } = await execFileAsync( + "git", + ["rev-parse", "HEAD"], + { cwd: repositoryRootPath }, +); +const sourceCommit = commitOutput.trim(); +const { stdout: statusOutput } = await execFileAsync( + "git", + ["status", "--short", "--", ...instrumentFiles], + { cwd: repositoryRootPath }, +); +const instrumentStatus = statusOutput.trim(); +if (instrumentStatus.length > 0 && !allowDirtyInstrument) { + throw new Error( + `Candidate instrument files are not clean:\n${instrumentStatus}\n` + + "Commit them before a paid run. The dirty escape hatch is hermetic-test-only.", + ); +} +if (allowDirtyInstrument && !isHermeticRun) { + throw new Error( + "BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ALLOW_DIRTY_INSTRUMENT is restricted to hermetic runs.", + ); +} + +const builtArtifactManifest = + await builtServerArtifactManifest(repositoryRootPath); +const builtArtifactManifestSha256 = sha256( + JSON.stringify(builtArtifactManifest), +); +const campaignFingerprint = sha256( + JSON.stringify({ + protocolId: PROTOCOL_ID, + outputNamespaceId: OUTPUT_NAMESPACE_ID, + comparisonTarget: COMPARISON_TARGET, + interviewerModel, + expertModel, + hardStop, + latencyStopMs, + fileSha256, + builtArtifactManifest, + }), +); + +interface ExistingCandidateRecord { + readonly protocolId?: unknown; + readonly outputNamespaceId?: unknown; + readonly replication?: unknown; + readonly campaignFingerprint?: unknown; +} + +if (!isHermeticRun) { + let existingNames: string[] = []; + try { + existingNames = await readdir(outputDirectory); + } catch (error) { + if ( + !(error instanceof Error) || + !("code" in error) || + error.code !== "ENOENT" + ) { + throw error; + } + } + const existingRecords = await Promise.all( + existingNames + .filter((entry) => entry.endsWith(".json")) + .map(async (name) => ({ + name, + record: JSON.parse( + await readFile(join(outputDirectory, name), "utf8"), + ) as ExistingCandidateRecord, + })), + ); + for (const { name, record: existing } of existingRecords) { + if ( + existing.protocolId !== PROTOCOL_ID || + existing.outputNamespaceId !== OUTPUT_NAMESPACE_ID + ) { + throw new Error( + `Candidate output namespace contains a foreign JSON artifact: ${name}`, + ); + } + if (existing.campaignFingerprint !== campaignFingerprint) { + throw new Error( + `Candidate artifact ${name} used a different frozen instrument or configuration.`, + ); + } + if (existing.replication === replication) { + throw new Error( + `Candidate replication ${replication} already has an immutable artifact: ${name}`, + ); + } + } + + const AnthropicClient = (await import("@anthropic-ai/sdk")).default; + await new AnthropicClient({ + apiKey, + maxRetries: 0, + timeout: 30_000, + }).messages.create({ + model: expertModel, + max_tokens: 1, + thinking: { type: "disabled" }, + system: + "Credential and model-availability preflight. Return one punctuation mark.", + messages: [{ role: "user", content: "." }], + }); +} + +const openingRaw = await readFile( + new URL("opening-message.md", caseDirectory), + "utf8", +); +const openingSeparator = openingRaw.indexOf("\n---\n"); +const openingMessage = ( + openingSeparator === -1 ? openingRaw : openingRaw.slice(openingSeparator + 5) +).trim(); +const situationPack = await readFile( + new URL("situation-pack.md", caseDirectory), + "utf8", +); +const finalizationMessage = [ + "[Evaluation stop instruction; not expert evidence]", + "The interview turn budget is exhausted.", + "Emit the full current Markdown runbook IR in one `runbook-ir` fenced block.", + "Do not ask another question, construct the Petri net, or read construction resources.", + "Preserve every unresolved unknown, not-yet-asked item, declined or deferred item, assumption, conflict, correction, contextual coexistence, omission, and loss.", +].join(" "); + +interface ExpertMessage { + readonly role: "user" | "assistant"; + readonly content: string; +} + +interface ExpertClient { + messages: { + create(request: Anthropic.MessageCreateParamsNonStreaming): Promise<{ + readonly content: readonly { + readonly type: string; + readonly text?: string; + }[]; + readonly model?: string; + readonly stop_reason?: string | null; + readonly usage?: Partial; + }>; + }; +} + +const defaultExportFrom = async (specifier: string): Promise => { + const loaded: unknown = await import(specifier); + if (typeof loaded !== "object" || loaded === null || !("default" in loaded)) { + throw new Error(`${specifier} has no default export`); + } + return loaded.default as Value; +}; + +const latestAssistantText = (snapshot: FlueConversationSnapshot): string => { + for (const message of snapshot.messages.toReversed()) { + if (message.purpose !== "assistant") continue; + const text = message.parts + .filter((part) => part.type === "text") + .map((part) => part.text) + .join("\n") + .trim(); + if (text.length > 0) return text; + } + return ""; +}; + +interface ModelCall { + readonly durationMs: number; + readonly providerId: string; + readonly providerName: string; + readonly api: string; + readonly requestedModel: string; + readonly observedModel: string | null; + readonly observedModelSource: "provider-response" | "unavailable"; + readonly stopReason: string | null; + readonly providerStopReason: string | null; + readonly inputTokens: number; + readonly outputTokens: number; + readonly totalTokens: number; + readonly cost: number; +} + +const unknownFailureMessage = (error: unknown): string => { + if (typeof error === "string") return error; + try { + return JSON.stringify({ error }); + } catch { + return "Unknown non-serializable failure"; + } +}; + +const failureFrom = (error: unknown) => + error instanceof Error + ? { name: error.name, message: error.message, stack: error.stack } + : { name: "UnknownFailure", message: unknownFailureMessage(error) }; + +const startedAt = new Date().toISOString(); +const runId = `${PROTOCOL_ID}-replication-${replication}-${startedAt.replaceAll( + /[:.]/gu, + "-", +)}-${randomUUID().slice(0, 8)}`; +const artifactBase = join(outputDirectory, runId); +const identity = { + principalKey: `principal-${PROTOCOL_ID}`, + conversationId: runId, +}; +const instanceId = flueConversationIdFrom(identity); +const databasePath = join(tmpdir(), `${runId}.db`); +process.env["BRUNCH_DEV_DB_PATH"] = databasePath; +await mkdir(outputDirectory, { recursive: true }); + +const instrument = { + sourceCommit, + instrumentStatus, + fileSha256, + builtArtifactManifest, + builtArtifactManifestSha256, +}; +const campaignConfiguration = { + interviewerModel, + expertModel, + hardStop, + latencyStopMs, +}; +const expertMessages: ExpertMessage[] = []; +const expertCalls: Array<{ + readonly requestedModel: string; + readonly observedModel: string | null; + readonly observedModelSource: "provider-response" | "unavailable"; + readonly stopReason: string | null; +}> = []; +const expertUsage = { + calls: 0, + inputTokens: 0, + outputTokens: 0, + cacheReadTokens: 0, + cacheWriteTokens: 0, +}; +const modelCalls: ModelCall[] = []; +let application: BuiltBrunchApplication | undefined; +let stopObserving: (() => void) | undefined; +let history: (() => Promise) | undefined; + +try { + if (interviewerProviderModule) { + setProvider(await defaultExportFrom(interviewerProviderModule)); + } + + const AnthropicClient = (await import("@anthropic-ai/sdk")).default; + const expertClient: ExpertClient = expertClientModule + ? await defaultExportFrom(expertClientModule) + : (new AnthropicClient({ + apiKey, + maxRetries: 5, + timeout: 30 * 60 * 1000, + }) as ExpertClient); + + const askExpert = async (interviewerText: string): Promise => { + expertMessages.push({ role: "user", content: interviewerText }); + const response = await expertClient.messages.create({ + model: expertModel, + max_tokens: 1500, + thinking: { type: "disabled" }, + system: situationPack, + messages: expertMessages, + }); + expertUsage.calls += 1; + expertUsage.inputTokens += response.usage?.input_tokens ?? 0; + expertUsage.outputTokens += response.usage?.output_tokens ?? 0; + expertUsage.cacheReadTokens += response.usage?.cache_read_input_tokens ?? 0; + expertUsage.cacheWriteTokens += + response.usage?.cache_creation_input_tokens ?? 0; + expertCalls.push({ + requestedModel: expertModel, + observedModel: response.model ?? null, + observedModelSource: + response.model === undefined ? "unavailable" : "provider-response", + stopReason: response.stop_reason ?? null, + }); + const text = response.content + .filter( + (block): block is { readonly type: "text"; readonly text: string } => + block.type === "text" && typeof block.text === "string", + ) + .map((block) => block.text) + .join("\n") + .trim(); + if (text.length === 0) { + throw new Error("The simulated expert returned no text"); + } + expertMessages.push({ role: "assistant", content: text }); + return text; + }; + + stopObserving = observe((event) => { + if (event.type !== "turn") return; + const usage = event.response.usage; + modelCalls.push({ + durationMs: event.durationMs, + providerId: event.request.providerId, + providerName: event.request.providerName, + api: event.request.api, + requestedModel: event.request.requestedModel, + observedModel: event.response.responseModel ?? null, + observedModelSource: + event.response.responseModel === undefined + ? "unavailable" + : "provider-response", + stopReason: event.response.finishReason ?? null, + providerStopReason: event.response.providerFinishReason ?? null, + inputTokens: usage?.input ?? 0, + outputTokens: usage?.output ?? 0, + totalTokens: usage?.totalTokens ?? 0, + cost: usage?.cost.total ?? 0, + }); + }); + + application = await loadBuiltBrunchApplication(); + const client = createFlueClient({ + url: `http://brunch.local/agents/${CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE}/${instanceId}`, + fetch: (input, init) => + Promise.resolve( + application!.fetch( + input instanceof Request ? input : new Request(input, init), + ), + ).then((response) => response), + headers: agentOwnershipHeaders(identity), + }); + history = () => client.history(); + + const logicalTurnDurationsMs: number[] = []; + const dispatch = async (body: string): Promise => { + const firstCallIndex = modelCalls.length; + const admission = await client.send({ message: { kind: "user", body } }); + await client.wait(admission); + logicalTurnDurationsMs.push( + modelCalls + .slice(firstCallIndex) + .reduce((total, call) => total + call.durationMs, 0), + ); + }; + + let interviewTurns = 1; + let stopReason = "hard-stop"; + await dispatch(openingMessage); + + while (interviewTurns < hardStop) { + const previousDuration = logicalTurnDurationsMs.at(-1) ?? 0; + if (previousDuration > latencyStopMs) { + stopReason = "latency-stop"; + break; + } + // oxlint-disable-next-line eslint/no-await-in-loop -- interview turns are causally sequential. + const snapshot = await client.history(); + const interviewerText = latestAssistantText(snapshot); + if (interviewerText.length === 0) { + stopReason = "empty-interviewer"; + break; + } + // oxlint-disable-next-line eslint/no-await-in-loop -- the expert must answer this settled interviewer turn. + const expertReply = await askExpert(interviewerText); + // oxlint-disable-next-line eslint/no-await-in-loop -- the next interviewer turn depends on the expert reply. + await dispatch(expertReply); + interviewTurns += 1; + } + + await dispatch(finalizationMessage); + const snapshot = await client.history(); + const workpiece = recoverRunbookWorkpiece(snapshot); + const ir = workpiece?.content; + const toolNames = interviewerToolNamesFrom(snapshot); + const resourcePaths = skillResourcePathsFrom(snapshot); + const resourceFilesRead = [ + ...new Set(resourcePaths.map((path) => basename(path))), + ]; + const transcript = formatFlueTranscript(snapshot); + const rawConversationSnapshotSha256 = sha256(JSON.stringify(snapshot)); + const violations = ordinaryElicitationViolationsFrom(snapshot, { + hasWorkpiece: workpiece !== undefined, + }); + const status = violations.length === 0 ? "completed" : "invalid"; + const record = { + schemaVersion: 1, + protocolId: PROTOCOL_ID, + outputNamespaceId: OUTPUT_NAMESPACE_ID, + comparisonTarget: COMPARISON_TARGET, + campaignFingerprint, + replication, + runId, + status, + startedAt, + completedAt: new Date().toISOString(), + ...campaignConfiguration, + interviewTurns, + stopReason, + finalizationMessage, + logicalTurnDurationsMs, + modelCalls, + expertUsage, + expertCalls, + expertMessages, + toolNames, + resourcePaths, + ir, + workpiece, + violations, + wroteCaptureStore: false, + instrument, + transcript, + rawConversationSnapshot: snapshot, + rawConversationSnapshotSha256, + }; + await writeFile( + `${artifactBase}.json`, + `${JSON.stringify(record, null, 2)}\n`, + { flag: "wx" }, + ); + await writeFile( + `${artifactBase}.md`, + [ + `# Prospective candidate runbook elicitation — replication ${replication}`, + "", + `- Protocol: \`${PROTOCOL_ID}\``, + `- Output namespace: \`${OUTPUT_NAMESPACE_ID}\``, + `- Run: \`${runId}\``, + `- Source commit: \`${sourceCommit}\``, + `- Interviewer: \`${interviewerModel}\``, + `- Simulated expert: \`${expertModel}\``, + `- Interview turns: ${interviewTurns} (hard stop ${hardStop})`, + `- Stop reason before final IR request: \`${stopReason}\``, + `- Recoverable IR: ${ir === undefined ? "no" : "yes"}`, + `- Member status: \`${status}\``, + ...(violations.length === 0 + ? [] + : violations.map( + (violation) => + `- Ordinary-path violation: \`${violation.code}\` — ${violation.detail}`, + )), + "- Final user message is an evaluation stop instruction, not expert evidence.", + "", + transcript, + "", + ].join("\n"), + { flag: "wx" }, + ); + if (ir !== undefined) { + await writeFile(`${artifactBase}.ir.md`, `${ir}\n`, { flag: "wx" }); + } + + process.stdout.write( + `PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V3_RESULT ${JSON.stringify({ + protocolId: PROTOCOL_ID, + outputNamespaceId: OUTPUT_NAMESPACE_ID, + replication, + stopReason, + hasIr: ir !== undefined, + interviewTurns, + toolNames, + resourceFilesRead, + wroteCaptureStore: false, + artifactBase, + })}\n`, + ); + if (status === "invalid") process.exitCode = 1; +} catch (error) { + let transcript: string | undefined; + let rawConversationSnapshot: FlueConversationSnapshot | undefined; + if (history !== undefined) { + try { + rawConversationSnapshot = await history(); + transcript = formatFlueTranscript(rawConversationSnapshot); + } catch { + // Preserve the originating failure even if history recovery also fails. + } + } + const failure = failureFrom(error); + const workpiece = + rawConversationSnapshot === undefined + ? undefined + : recoverRunbookWorkpiece(rawConversationSnapshot); + const violations = + rawConversationSnapshot === undefined + ? [] + : ordinaryElicitationViolationsFrom(rawConversationSnapshot, { + hasWorkpiece: workpiece !== undefined, + }); + const failureRecord = { + schemaVersion: 1, + protocolId: PROTOCOL_ID, + outputNamespaceId: OUTPUT_NAMESPACE_ID, + comparisonTarget: COMPARISON_TARGET, + campaignFingerprint, + replication, + runId, + status: "invalid", + invalidReason: "runtime-failure", + startedAt, + failedAt: new Date().toISOString(), + ...campaignConfiguration, + finalizationMessage, + modelCalls, + expertUsage, + expertCalls, + expertMessages, + violations, + workpiece, + wroteCaptureStore: false, + instrument, + failure, + transcript, + rawConversationSnapshot, + rawConversationSnapshotSha256: + rawConversationSnapshot === undefined + ? undefined + : sha256(JSON.stringify(rawConversationSnapshot)), + }; + const failureArtifact = `${artifactBase}.failure-${randomUUID().slice(0, 8)}.json`; + let retentionFailure: unknown; + try { + await writeFile( + failureArtifact, + `${JSON.stringify(failureRecord, null, 2)}\n`, + { flag: "wx" }, + ); + } catch (retentionError) { + retentionFailure = retentionError; + } + process.stderr.write( + `PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V3_FAILURE ${JSON.stringify({ + runId, + artifact: retentionFailure === undefined ? failureArtifact : undefined, + failure, + retentionFailure: + retentionFailure instanceof Error + ? { + name: retentionFailure.name, + message: retentionFailure.message, + stack: retentionFailure.stack, + } + : retentionFailure === undefined + ? undefined + : { + name: "UnknownFailure", + message: unknownFailureMessage(retentionFailure), + }, + })}\n`, + ); + process.exitCode = 1; +} finally { + const cleanupFailures: Array<{ + readonly operation: string; + readonly name: string; + readonly message: string; + readonly stack?: string; + }> = []; + const retainCleanupFailure = (operation: string, error: unknown): void => { + cleanupFailures.push( + error instanceof Error + ? { + operation, + name: error.name, + message: error.message, + stack: error.stack, + } + : { + operation, + name: "UnknownFailure", + message: unknownFailureMessage(error), + }, + ); + }; + try { + stopObserving?.(); + } catch (error) { + retainCleanupFailure("stop-observing", error); + } + try { + await application?.stop(); + } catch (error) { + retainCleanupFailure("stop-application", error); + } + try { + await rm(databasePath, { force: true }); + } catch (error) { + retainCleanupFailure("remove-temporary-database", error); + } + if (cleanupFailures.length > 0) { + const cleanupArtifact = `${artifactBase}.cleanup-failure-${randomUUID().slice(0, 8)}.json`; + let retentionFailure: unknown; + try { + await writeFile( + cleanupArtifact, + `${JSON.stringify( + { + schemaVersion: 1, + protocolId: PROTOCOL_ID, + outputNamespaceId: OUTPUT_NAMESPACE_ID, + comparisonTarget: COMPARISON_TARGET, + campaignFingerprint, + replication, + runId, + status: "invalid", + invalidReason: "cleanup-failure", + startedAt, + failedAt: new Date().toISOString(), + cleanupFailures, + instrument, + }, + null, + 2, + )}\n`, + { flag: "wx" }, + ); + } catch (error) { + retentionFailure = error; + } + process.stderr.write( + `PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V3_CLEANUP_FAILURE ${JSON.stringify({ + runId, + artifact: retentionFailure === undefined ? cleanupArtifact : undefined, + cleanupFailures, + retentionFailure: + retentionFailure instanceof Error + ? { + name: retentionFailure.name, + message: retentionFailure.message, + } + : retentionFailure === undefined + ? undefined + : { + name: "UnknownFailure", + message: unknownFailureMessage(retentionFailure), + }, + })}\n`, + ); + process.exitCode = 1; + } +} diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/prospective-runbook-v3.test.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/prospective-runbook-v3.test.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..b4bb4afe91e --- /dev/null +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/prospective-runbook-v3.test.ts @@ -0,0 +1,100 @@ +import { mkdtemp, readFile, readdir, rm } from "node:fs/promises"; +import { tmpdir } from "node:os"; +import { join } from "node:path"; + +import { expect, test } from "vitest"; + +import { runNodeScript } from "./run-node-script"; + +const testDirectory = import.meta.dirname; +const repositoryRoot = join(testDirectory, "../../.."); +const runnerPath = join( + testDirectory, + "../src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v3-run.ts", +); +const modelKeyName = ["ANTHROPIC", "API", "KEY"].join("_"); + +test("the hermetic v3 runner freezes the architecture-only comparison target", async () => { + const outputDirectory = await mkdtemp( + join(tmpdir(), "brunch-architecture-v3-"), + ); + try { + const { exitCode, stdout, stderr } = await runNodeScript( + runnerPath, + repositoryRoot, + { + [modelKeyName]: "", + BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL: "claude-haiku-4-5", + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_EXPERT_MODEL: "faux-vestera-expert", + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_HARD_STOP: "2", + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_REPLICATION: "1", + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_OUTPUT_DIR: outputDirectory, + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ALLOW_DIRTY_INSTRUMENT: "1", + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ANTHROPIC_MODULE: join( + testDirectory, + "runbook-elicitation-faux-expert.ts", + ), + BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_INTERVIEWER_PROVIDER_MODULE: join( + testDirectory, + "runbook-elicitation-faux-provider.ts", + ), + }, + ); + + expect(exitCode, stderr || stdout).toBe(0); + const resultLine = stdout + .split("\n") + .find((line) => line.startsWith("PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V3_RESULT ")); + expect(resultLine).toBeDefined(); + const result = JSON.parse( + resultLine!.slice("PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V3_RESULT ".length), + ) as { + outputNamespaceId: string; + protocolId: string; + }; + expect(result).toMatchObject({ + protocolId: "prospective-runbook-v3", + outputNamespaceId: "vestera-architecture-candidate-v3", + }); + + const recordName = (await readdir(outputDirectory)).find((name) => + name.endsWith(".json"), + ); + const record = JSON.parse( + await readFile(join(outputDirectory, recordName!), "utf8"), + ) as { + comparisonTarget: { + memberRunIds: string[]; + outputNamespaceId: string; + qualityPopulation: string; + runtimeAccounting: string; + }; + instrument: { + fileSha256: Record; + }; + }; + expect(record.comparisonTarget).toEqual({ + protocolId: "prospective-runbook-v1", + outputNamespaceId: "vestera-prospective-baseline-v1", + memberRunIds: [ + "runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-50-28-709Z-20a4817f", + "runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-56-34-754Z-4b75737c", + ], + qualityPopulation: "valid-workpieces", + runtimeAccounting: "reported-separately", + }); + for (const runId of record.comparisonTarget.memberRunIds) { + expect(record.instrument.fileSha256).toHaveProperty( + `libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/${runId}.ir.md`, + ); + expect(record.instrument.fileSha256).toHaveProperty( + `libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/${runId}.omniscient.md`, + ); + expect(record.instrument.fileSha256).toHaveProperty( + `libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/${runId}.cold.md`, + ); + } + } finally { + await rm(outputDirectory, { recursive: true, force: true }); + } +}); diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md index 795e6b6cfe4..a542440d969 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ Observe all of the following: 4. **Workpiece contract.** The domain-primary workpiece gives one cold-readable authoritative home to purpose and process spine; expert evidence; normalization/inference; assumptions with reason and check; unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, conflict, correction, contextual coexistence, omission, and loss where material; and construction-opened decisions without laundering authorship. Oracle: exact-candidate walkthrough and independent cold review. 5. **Named adversarial cases.** Walkthroughs exercise opening overload, policy/practice, contextual quantities, scarce-resource reservation/release, hidden waiting, directional loss, correction versus contextual coexistence, unknown versus not-yet-asked, and construction-opened loss ownership. Oracle: a fixed matrix mapping recognition → operation → question → authoritative home → epistemic treatment → construction boundary → expected observation. 6. **Production integrity.** Core, plugin, and app exports/builds/typechecks/lints/unit tests pass; ordinary paths expose no capture or construction mutation tools; construct-only execution retains checked tool use and evidence-honest delivery. Oracle: recorded HASH workspace commands and build-artifact inspection. -7. **Frozen comparative campaign.** A new versioned protocol commits and hashes the exact candidate, preserves raw traces/manifests/invalid members, runs through the production `ChatAgent`, and receives independent fresh-context omniscient and cold grading with the frozen ruler. Oracle: campaign artifacts and human adjudication against Mission 3's range without reducing either campaign to a mean. +7. **Frozen architecture scoring campaign.** A new versioned protocol commits and hashes the exact candidate and the latest two valid flat-prompt control workpieces, preserves raw traces/manifests/invalid members, runs through the production `ChatAgent`, and receives independent fresh-context omniscient and cold grading with the frozen ruler. Oracle: workpiece-quality artifacts and human adjudication against only the named flat-prompt score range, without aggregating historical design families or reducing either side to a mean; runtime and simulator failures are reported separately. 8. **Visible product witness.** A human can use the selected candidate through the local/restricted Petrinaut panel → AI SDK → production Flue `ChatAgent` boundary and inspect the recovered workpiece. Oracle: retained visible-interaction evidence and owner adjudication; no remote-deployment language. 9. **Mission 5 handoff.** One selected workpiece is frozen with its exact source Flue conversation, exact instrument/model manifest, and comparative evaluation/adjudication. Oracle: close-package audit verifies hashes, paths, correspondence, and cold readability. 10. **Close integrity.** Mission 3 evidence remains byte-for-byte untouched; obsolete shaping workbenches and transient handoff material are disposed only after their surviving content has an authoritative home; future planning is reconciled without loss; Mission 4 is archived and Mission 5 remains unimplemented. Oracle: scoped git diff/hash inspection, planning-home audit, archive-index check, and PR close report. @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ Observe all of the following: ## Constraints - Preserve the Mission 3 campaign and frozen ruler unchanged. Never write candidate output into `vestera-prospective-baseline-v1` or represent relocated current source as the v1 instrument. +- Use only the two valid `vestera-prospective-baseline-v1` workpieces as the quality control. Do not aggregate historical side quests, draft families, invalid members, or unrelated construction runs into the architecture score. Keep operational validity separate from conditional workpiece quality. - The owner retains authority over this amended contract, substantive candidate repairs exposed by walkthroughs, the paid budget ceiling, campaign adjudication, witness acceptance, handoff selection, and closure. - No paid campaign or paid grading call may occur until the exact instrument is frozen and the owner separately authorizes a call and cost ceiling. - Keep one model-facing agent, one mounted SDCPN job skill, Flue-native returned instructions/`useInstruction`/`useSkill`/`useTool`, progressive resource disclosure, and the production `ChatAgent` door. Add no loader, workflow engine, second agent, or TUI. @@ -76,8 +77,8 @@ Observe all of the following: Do not design past these remaining evidence and owner gates: - Whether the exact candidate walkthrough exposes a substantive content repair. Any repair must be presented with its observed failure, smallest correction, and regression risk before editing and must rerun affected free gates. -- The smallest versioned campaign that can reveal regression against the control's observed variation without pretending to estimate universal performance. Freeze protocol membership and stop rules before the first paid call. -- The paid-call and cost ceiling. It is intentionally unresolved until the frozen-instrument audit. +- Whether the three-invocation v3 campaign yields the two valid workpieces needed to compare like-for-like with the latest flat-prompt controls without pretending to estimate universal performance. +- The owner-approved US$10 ceiling across candidate and grader calls; stop before exceeding it. - Which valid candidate workpiece is the strongest cold-readable Mission 5 handoff. Select only after independent reports and human comparative adjudication. - Whether the accepted local/restricted visible witness exposes a product-boundary failure not visible in the headless campaign. Stop and repair the first real failed boundary rather than broadening into remote infrastructure. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-candidate-v2/campaign-abort.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-candidate-v2/campaign-abort.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5567dbd88f9 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-candidate-v2/campaign-abort.md @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +# Prospective candidate v2 — abort adjudication + +## Disposition + +Preserve v2 as an aborted operational campaign. Do not run replication 3, replace either observed member, grade v2 as workpiece-quality evidence, or mix it into the latest flat-prompt control. + +| Replication | Outcome | Attribution | Quality use | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | +| 1 | Provider authentication returned `401` before an interviewer response | Stale credential remained in the relaunched process environment | None | +| 2 | Simulated expert returned `stop_reason: refusal` with no text after three ordinary exchanges | Expert-simulator/provider boundary | None; no workpiece | +| 3 | Not run | Owner stopped the confounded campaign | None | + +Both observed failures have immutable nonce-bearing JSON records. Replication 2 also retains the exact partial Flue snapshot and expert exchange. Neither failure establishes a defect in the Mission 4 workpiece architecture, and neither supplies a gradeable workpiece. + +## Reorientation + +The owner narrowed the Mission 4 comparison to the selected architecture's workpiece quality against the latest two valid flat-prompt baseline workpieces. [`prospective-runbook-v3`](../../../../evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v3/protocol.md) freezes that question, hashes the exact controls, keeps runtime accounting separate from quality scores, and adds credential preflight outside campaign membership. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-candidate-v2/prospective-runbook-v2-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-26-30-977Z-8edb4225.failure-46b787ce.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-candidate-v2/prospective-runbook-v2-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-26-30-977Z-8edb4225.failure-46b787ce.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2a17effdbbe --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-candidate-v2/prospective-runbook-v2-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-26-30-977Z-8edb4225.failure-46b787ce.json @@ -0,0 +1,162 @@ +{ + "schemaVersion": 1, + "protocolId": "prospective-runbook-v2", + "outputNamespaceId": "vestera-prospective-candidate-v2", + "campaignFingerprint": "302a264c244bc71adad3d4df344da073f70a3da6b4e2e7536d859b951895907e", + "replication": 1, + "runId": "prospective-runbook-v2-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-26-30-977Z-8edb4225", + "status": "invalid", + "invalidReason": "runtime-failure", + "startedAt": "2026-09-02T11:26:30.977Z", + "failedAt": "2026-09-02T11:26:31.350Z", + "interviewerModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "expertModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "hardStop": 8, + "latencyStopMs": 180000, + "finalizationMessage": "[Evaluation stop instruction; not expert evidence] The interview turn budget is exhausted. Emit the full current Markdown runbook IR in one `runbook-ir` fenced block. Do not ask another question, construct the Petri net, or read construction resources. Preserve every unresolved unknown, not-yet-asked item, declined or deferred item, assumption, conflict, correction, contextual coexistence, omission, and loss.", + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 255, + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": null, + "observedModelSource": "unavailable", + "stopReason": "error", + "providerStopReason": null, + "inputTokens": 0, + "outputTokens": 0, + "totalTokens": 0, + "cost": 0 + } + ], + "expertUsage": { + "calls": 0, + "inputTokens": 0, + "outputTokens": 0, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0 + }, + "expertCalls": [], + "expertMessages": [], + "violations": [ + { + "code": "missing-workpiece", + "detail": "No recoverable runbook-ir workpiece was emitted." + } + ], + "wroteCaptureStore": false, + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "605e681cebfaeaa3fcdd0502f50ab28adc7ac63d", + "instrumentStatus": "", + "fileSha256": { + "yarn.lock": "3f445d255ef7893c1941f5610e2a813a903d5b9053c9831012c3d7c3875571dc", + "apps/brunch-agent/package.json": "128b3fd6c9624c35b226b91d39e27cf1a9cdfbdafc0314b380b7d51e1de92b46", + "apps/brunch-agent/vite.config.ts": "f1a50233829599dff2d5ef7ee0cd10bdb55d7fe65a52a6e85913e00a33a5300d", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/app.ts": "979efb9172c82df7499b218125735929a9586a0d9355e042e9ff2402955f385e", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/db.ts": "9f3a2598df3ce6737de1348afa8baf7deeeeac51b8202bf87adb76dc96374481", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "e87ebbd611dd87f897c0ab15c704e6604bc032f99a96ee1a3bb827c03344300e", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/ping.ts": "a6f50f65f1bb4f1b62a2bf5fa23b343b973dd007be720a33dfbf5cd4a0595744", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/identity.ts": "b52f764ba6e6bb50602d477eb93234aa6a900c843412551de40ea6ad3050e5e6", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/transcript.ts": "b96cf8d2b8352d414f674985b7071c9570323ccaf862f7e77ec76311e4b11d44", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/http/routes.ts": "7d8389931c57671ad8376d0a0ab497413013d47b012ffbf531339d0d1ce3a0cd", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/artifacts.ts": "15951ab3705b126d64a2593731b50775a16915298dae87b8cf7c99e265e2c2f4", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/campaign-integrity.ts": "60215179f5d48bacbf4da7b0876d049ed8b15b4b774d99eab092a1297502a3b4", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/load-built-application.ts": "c4b28985ad98dd1dde5afb8838ba6f9445692d208adde05c22f30f6074365056", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v2-run.ts": "c5bfd41fb727da4fb07a6e2c15c1c66abacad7c9867983cf19377475117d88b1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/package.json": "e12d9cc79d38c43e5543a5667753e5049dfbf21bec425c25942f1c4cbb922a1f", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "82b035268c07cc8ee4736b5ffdd392c8f153793d2ca6b9ed57271c9b6146de10", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "0bd463eaab4eb68b86431bf26e0e01f90c89437b2888c86f4da53d7a0f39ec13", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/package.json": "dca0db144c530bcf66c5400c029efa5e1136c9d7f81ed174343e891985200c33", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md": "9915751f11baf06de31b237ee8df57b5217f2e7f0531090370a7e08d0282b6c2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "d5bac87a192b92fb6b7d749ec3d58116f9e39527b59e425c60aaeedf5cc13bd0", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts": "a283342146c8d2c2cb8056c588e76c1c3094f1e21e731be251c8fcdb335ed1b2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "ea3a8755a576e98d35fce6a1e1f928a61148eb713f0bc2c2f818d104eb5f3832", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "6c26ed3808ccbb7133ea7c370779e63885dfdc342c6594f5cb3730b467e2b1da", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "43dbc9adc9168ae9984321895fca441386ee3c44ab8691ba92baec0f7c43f400", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts": "7a4a03b62267531ba65b0f27128d804ad7fc70acf333266910010cc999f19d40", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts": "9e020d8bee5e6c9902b5e5b609abc5930d3e27647d0f4d0d4679f3e31097dfbb", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/opening-message.md": "84ec5faa5fd46699c008b3b2aad49eb9988b8c2ab039c8e147fdb077d562ef54", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/situation-pack.md": "4dbeb44a881c4675ec0ce7a5f068ea46ce1a4968a405b2dd692f92816d33e083", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/vestera-scheduling/truth-ledger-v1-prospective.yaml": "6be9753bcbeb31a4bcb839be1acd4de4a15b1754af25d2cdd0b75fe63dd3d860", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/ir-quality-ruler-v1.md": "817e43d15848bcec3c720a3e8b1104d31faf3035fd7ae8269d0a97ee43ef4a9a", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1/omniscient-grader.md": "a0ab12ceb3fc26d314b3f674ed6728a6bf5a6a24d2325ed32336020a605d96e5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1/cold-ir-reviewer.md": "ddd2620f17c5311a4a186b5bc229ae3f916d811e4aeb35f215ed7502c31fc8f5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v2/protocol.md": "5f11b043fb0ec18c9c7afba3b729ea1212fe0f88e06220efead48dfd250af562" + }, + "builtArtifactManifest": [ + { + "path": "apps/brunch-agent/dist/app.mjs", + "sha256": "5ce74b2646c00b959b3ee847b47e006717ccc21e1fba769ce818566cba6da62e" + }, + { + "path": "apps/brunch-agent/dist/node-server-BWNSXBme.mjs", + "sha256": "90343929bc5274e0644003e8d7ea69b02003ac4d3b364a0afdb0be0e1032c066" + }, + { + "path": "apps/brunch-agent/dist/server.mjs", + "sha256": "c2d4ccb5aa999e33d33530ba87280e4bb6d6aacd41df630876297bfabea8f04e" + } + ], + "builtArtifactManifestSha256": "5bb67f5cbb1315e789426d83780ed9af23c58b1a04cf14a4b62a831cae435cd0" + }, + "failure": { + "name": "FlueExecutionError", + "message": "Agent submission sub_01M1GXXQMP7D5C77PD149F1ZJD failed: direct(sub_01M1GXXQMP7D5C77PD149F1ZJD) failed: 401 {\"type\":\"error\",\"error\":{\"type\":\"authentication_error\",\"message\":\"API key is invalid.\"},\"request_id\":null}", + "stack": "FlueExecutionError: Agent submission sub_01M1GXXQMP7D5C77PD149F1ZJD failed: direct(sub_01M1GXXQMP7D5C77PD149F1ZJD) failed: 401 {\"type\":\"error\",\"error\":{\"type\":\"authentication_error\",\"message\":\"API key is invalid.\"},\"request_id\":null}\n at waitForAgentSubmission (file:///Users/lunelson/.herdr/worktrees/hash/bravo/node_modules/@flue/sdk/dist/index.mjs:1028:11)\n at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:105:5)\n at async dispatch (file:///Users/lunelson/.herdr/worktrees/hash/bravo/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v2-run.ts:538:5)\n at async file:///Users/lunelson/.herdr/worktrees/hash/bravo/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v2-run.ts:548:3" + }, + "transcript": "## User\nI'm the master scheduler at a coatings plant. My boss wants a simulation model of how we\nschedule production, so we can test scheduling decisions before making them. We have tooling\nthat runs Petri-net-style process models, so the end product should be a model I can hand to\nthat — but I can't tell you much about the format, I'm not the modelling person.\n\nPlease interview me about how our operation works, and then produce the model.", + "rawConversationSnapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1GXXQMRF5G7XJW11P21BVJR", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000006", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFHWFhRTVA3RDVDNzdQRDE0OUYxWkpE", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GXXQMP7D5C77PD149F1ZJD", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'm the master scheduler at a coatings plant. My boss wants a simulation model of how we\nschedule production, so we can test scheduling decisions before making them. We have tooling\nthat runs Petri-net-style process models, so the end product should be a model I can hand to\nthat — but I can't tell you much about the format, I'm not the modelling person.\n\nPlease interview me about how our operation works, and then produce the model.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1GXXQXDAQW5JNNR8ZK2CK20", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GXXQMP7D5C77PD149F1ZJD", + "turnId": "turn_01M1GXXQNF4V3611A3GPHX3V0Y", + "parts": [] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GXXQMP7D5C77PD149F1ZJD", + "outcome": "failed", + "error": { + "name": "FlueError", + "message": "direct(sub_01M1GXXQMP7D5C77PD149F1ZJD) failed: 401 {\"type\":\"error\",\"error\":{\"type\":\"authentication_error\",\"message\":\"API key is invalid.\"},\"request_id\":null}", + "type": "operation_failed", + "details": "", + "meta": { + "operation": "direct(sub_01M1GXXQMP7D5C77PD149F1ZJD)", + "reason": "401 {\"type\":\"error\",\"error\":{\"type\":\"authentication_error\",\"message\":\"API key is invalid.\"},\"request_id\":null}" + } + }, + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1GXXQMP7D5C77PD149F1ZJD" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1GXXQMP0D9RWF9JFA1N396D" + }, + "rawConversationSnapshotSha256": "c6df4476975908b24412df5c5d4354ad5ab309da882be8a72a16a39f03d26283" +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-candidate-v2/prospective-runbook-v2-replication-2-2026-09-02T11-32-08-894Z-7afbec23.failure-79bae3d9.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-candidate-v2/prospective-runbook-v2-replication-2-2026-09-02T11-32-08-894Z-7afbec23.failure-79bae3d9.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..eea120f0bbe --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-candidate-v2/prospective-runbook-v2-replication-2-2026-09-02T11-32-08-894Z-7afbec23.failure-79bae3d9.json @@ -0,0 +1,452 @@ +{ + "schemaVersion": 1, + "protocolId": "prospective-runbook-v2", + "outputNamespaceId": "vestera-prospective-candidate-v2", + "campaignFingerprint": "302a264c244bc71adad3d4df344da073f70a3da6b4e2e7536d859b951895907e", + "replication": 2, + "runId": "prospective-runbook-v2-replication-2-2026-09-02T11-32-08-894Z-7afbec23", + "status": "invalid", + "invalidReason": "runtime-failure", + "startedAt": "2026-09-02T11:32:08.894Z", + "failedAt": "2026-09-02T11:34:07.424Z", + "interviewerModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "expertModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "hardStop": 8, + "latencyStopMs": 180000, + "finalizationMessage": "[Evaluation stop instruction; not expert evidence] The interview turn budget is exhausted. Emit the full current Markdown runbook IR in one `runbook-ir` fenced block. Do not ask another question, construct the Petri net, or read construction resources. Preserve every unresolved unknown, not-yet-asked item, declined or deferred item, assumption, conflict, correction, contextual coexistence, omission, and loss.", + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 5476, + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": null, + "observedModelSource": "unavailable", + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "providerStopReason": null, + "inputTokens": 10, + "outputTokens": 273, + "totalTokens": 2759, + "cost": 0.013409999999999998 + }, + { + "durationMs": 7416, + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": null, + "observedModelSource": "unavailable", + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "providerStopReason": null, + "inputTokens": 12, + "outputTokens": 334, + "totalTokens": 4324, + "cost": 0.011421299999999999 + }, + { + "durationMs": 15869, + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": null, + "observedModelSource": "unavailable", + "stopReason": "stop", + "providerStopReason": null, + "inputTokens": 14, + "outputTokens": 362, + "totalTokens": 11082, + "cost": 0.0318954 + }, + { + "durationMs": 25324, + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": null, + "observedModelSource": "unavailable", + "stopReason": "stop", + "providerStopReason": null, + "inputTokens": 10, + "outputTokens": 573, + "totalTokens": 11375, + "cost": 0.0405528 + }, + { + "durationMs": 12755, + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": null, + "observedModelSource": "unavailable", + "stopReason": "stop", + "providerStopReason": null, + "inputTokens": 10, + "outputTokens": 461, + "totalTokens": 11735, + "cost": 0.0119526 + }, + { + "durationMs": 11688, + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": null, + "observedModelSource": "unavailable", + "stopReason": "stop", + "providerStopReason": null, + "inputTokens": 10, + "outputTokens": 304, + "totalTokens": 12041, + "cost": 0.00970545 + } + ], + "expertUsage": { + "calls": 4, + "inputTokens": 13458, + "outputTokens": 1101, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0 + }, + "expertCalls": [ + { + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929", + "observedModelSource": "provider-response", + "stopReason": "end_turn" + }, + { + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929", + "observedModelSource": "provider-response", + "stopReason": "end_turn" + }, + { + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929", + "observedModelSource": "provider-response", + "stopReason": "end_turn" + }, + { + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929", + "observedModelSource": "provider-response", + "stopReason": "refusal" + } + ], + "expertMessages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": "Good — I understand you need a simulation model that lets you test scheduling decisions before implementing them. I'll interview you to understand how your scheduling operation works, then build a model from that.\n\nLet me start with a concrete recent case: **Walk me through the last time you had to schedule a new batch or order — what arrived or triggered it, what did you look at to decide how to fit it in, and what happened next?**" + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "*leans back, thinking*\n\nLast real fire was… Friday afternoon, actually. Commercial forwarded a rush order from one of our distributors — needed 800 units of TC-11, that's a mid-blue tint, by Tuesday. Normally that'd be fine, but we were already squeezed.\n\nFirst thing I did was pull up the sheet — I've got the week's runs mapped out by line, with changeovers pencilled in. Line 2 was running whites all weekend, Line 1 had a specialty batch finishing Saturday morning, and Line 3 was on a different tint family. \n\nTC-11 meant I needed a tint-qualified line. Line 3's not signed off for TC-11 yet — quality's still working through the product list — so it was Line 1 or Line 2. Line 2 was mid-run on a big white order for Meridian, and pulling it off early to wash down for tint would've cost me three hours plus scrap, then another washdown back to white. That's dead time I couldn't afford.\n\nSo I looked at Line 1. The specialty was wrapping Saturday around noon. I could squeeze TC-11 in next — it's same tint family as what was queued behind the specialty, so only a quick rinse between them, maybe half an hour. Pushed one of Monday's smaller runs back a few hours, called the distributor, told them Monday afternoon instead of Tuesday morning. They grumbled but took it.\n\nTold the floor at Monday's huddle. Line 1 ran it, came out fine. That's usually how it goes — juggle, squeeze, call somebody." + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "That's helpful — you made a real trade: avoided an expensive mid-run washdown on Line 2 by using Line 1's opening and pushing something else. \n\nYou mentioned **tint families** matter for how long a changeover takes. Help me understand that: what makes two products part of the same tint family, and what actually changes about the changeover when you're staying in the same family versus switching between families?" + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "*nods*\n\nRight, so there's three families: **base whites**, **tinted colours**, and **specialty clears**. It's about what goes into them and what residue they leave.\n\nBase whites are just that — titanium white pigment, no colour tints. Tinted colours have chromatic pigments added at the letdown stage — blues, reds, greens, earth tones, whatever. Specialty clears are thick formulations, different resin system entirely, no pigment at all — they're for industrial gloss coats.\n\nWhen you stay **inside a family**, it's a quick rinse — maybe 20, 30 minutes. You're flushing out one white for another white, or one tint shade for another tint shade. The lines can handle trace carryover, QA doesn't flinch.\n\n**Switching families** is where it gets expensive. If you go white to tint, that's about 45 minutes — you need to get the line properly clean so the white residue doesn't dilute the colour. But tint back to white? That's the killer — full washdown, around three hours. Any pigment carryover into a white batch shows up, and we can't ship it. QA will reject it, or worse, a customer sees streaks. So you scrub everything: mix tank, mill, letdown lines, the whole train.\n\nSpecialty in or out, either direction, is about two hours. Different chemistry, you've got to purge the resin system thoroughly or you get adhesion problems downstream.\n\nThe changeover crew does all of it — same two techs, day shift. If two lines need washing at once, somebody waits." + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "Good — so the changeover time isn't symmetric, and tint back to white is the expensive direction you want to avoid. That three-hour washdown is what you dodged by using Line 1 instead of pulling Line 2 off the Meridian white order.\n\nYou mentioned Line 3 wasn't signed off for TC-11 yet. Let me understand **what each line can actually run**: How many production lines do you have total, and what determines which products each line is allowed or qualified to make?" + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "*counts on fingers*\n\nThree lines total. They're all the same stages — mix, mill, tint-letdown, fill-and-pack — but they're not identical and they're not all qualified for everything.\n\n**Line 1** is the old workhorse. Slower, but it's qualified for the full product list — all the whites, all the tints, all the specialty clears. If there's a fussy product or something new, it goes on Line 1 first.\n\n**Line 2** is the fast line, built for volume. It runs whites beautifully — that's where all the big Meridian orders go. It can run tints too, but we've never piped it for the clear resins, so no specialty. Line 2 is whites and tints only.\n\n**Line 3** is the newest — quick, modern, still being qualified product by product. Quality and engineering are working through the SKU list one at a time, running validation batches. Right now it's cleared for most of the whites, some of the tints, and a couple of the specialty clears. But not all of them yet — TC-11's one of the tint SKUs still on the \"not yet\" list. It's a rolling thing; every few weeks another product gets signed off.\n\nSo when I'm slotting an order, I've got to check what's qualified where. Sometimes that boxes me in — like Friday, TC-11 meant Line 1 or nothing, because Line 2 doesn't do specialty and Line 3 isn't approved yet." + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "Understood — so Line 1 is universal but slower, Line 2 is fast but whites and tints only, and Line 3 is still being opened up product by product. That qualification constraint was binding when TC-11 arrived.\n\nLet me understand what actually happens once you've assigned an order to a qualified line. **Take that TC-11 run on Line 1**: after the specialty batch finished Saturday and you did the quick rinse, what happened during the TC-11 run itself — what stages did it go through, roughly how long did it take, and what made the line unavailable for anything else?" + } + ], + "violations": [ + { + "code": "missing-workpiece", + "detail": "No recoverable runbook-ir workpiece was emitted." + } + ], + "wroteCaptureStore": false, + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "605e681cebfaeaa3fcdd0502f50ab28adc7ac63d", + "instrumentStatus": "", + "fileSha256": { + "yarn.lock": "3f445d255ef7893c1941f5610e2a813a903d5b9053c9831012c3d7c3875571dc", + "apps/brunch-agent/package.json": "128b3fd6c9624c35b226b91d39e27cf1a9cdfbdafc0314b380b7d51e1de92b46", + "apps/brunch-agent/vite.config.ts": "f1a50233829599dff2d5ef7ee0cd10bdb55d7fe65a52a6e85913e00a33a5300d", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/app.ts": "979efb9172c82df7499b218125735929a9586a0d9355e042e9ff2402955f385e", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/db.ts": "9f3a2598df3ce6737de1348afa8baf7deeeeac51b8202bf87adb76dc96374481", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "e87ebbd611dd87f897c0ab15c704e6604bc032f99a96ee1a3bb827c03344300e", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/ping.ts": "a6f50f65f1bb4f1b62a2bf5fa23b343b973dd007be720a33dfbf5cd4a0595744", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/identity.ts": "b52f764ba6e6bb50602d477eb93234aa6a900c843412551de40ea6ad3050e5e6", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/transcript.ts": "b96cf8d2b8352d414f674985b7071c9570323ccaf862f7e77ec76311e4b11d44", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/http/routes.ts": "7d8389931c57671ad8376d0a0ab497413013d47b012ffbf531339d0d1ce3a0cd", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/artifacts.ts": "15951ab3705b126d64a2593731b50775a16915298dae87b8cf7c99e265e2c2f4", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/campaign-integrity.ts": "60215179f5d48bacbf4da7b0876d049ed8b15b4b774d99eab092a1297502a3b4", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/load-built-application.ts": "c4b28985ad98dd1dde5afb8838ba6f9445692d208adde05c22f30f6074365056", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v2-run.ts": "c5bfd41fb727da4fb07a6e2c15c1c66abacad7c9867983cf19377475117d88b1", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/package.json": "e12d9cc79d38c43e5543a5667753e5049dfbf21bec425c25942f1c4cbb922a1f", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "82b035268c07cc8ee4736b5ffdd392c8f153793d2ca6b9ed57271c9b6146de10", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "0bd463eaab4eb68b86431bf26e0e01f90c89437b2888c86f4da53d7a0f39ec13", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/package.json": "dca0db144c530bcf66c5400c029efa5e1136c9d7f81ed174343e891985200c33", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md": "9915751f11baf06de31b237ee8df57b5217f2e7f0531090370a7e08d0282b6c2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "d5bac87a192b92fb6b7d749ec3d58116f9e39527b59e425c60aaeedf5cc13bd0", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts": "a283342146c8d2c2cb8056c588e76c1c3094f1e21e731be251c8fcdb335ed1b2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "ea3a8755a576e98d35fce6a1e1f928a61148eb713f0bc2c2f818d104eb5f3832", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "6c26ed3808ccbb7133ea7c370779e63885dfdc342c6594f5cb3730b467e2b1da", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "43dbc9adc9168ae9984321895fca441386ee3c44ab8691ba92baec0f7c43f400", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts": "7a4a03b62267531ba65b0f27128d804ad7fc70acf333266910010cc999f19d40", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts": "9e020d8bee5e6c9902b5e5b609abc5930d3e27647d0f4d0d4679f3e31097dfbb", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/opening-message.md": "84ec5faa5fd46699c008b3b2aad49eb9988b8c2ab039c8e147fdb077d562ef54", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/situation-pack.md": "4dbeb44a881c4675ec0ce7a5f068ea46ce1a4968a405b2dd692f92816d33e083", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/vestera-scheduling/truth-ledger-v1-prospective.yaml": "6be9753bcbeb31a4bcb839be1acd4de4a15b1754af25d2cdd0b75fe63dd3d860", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/ir-quality-ruler-v1.md": "817e43d15848bcec3c720a3e8b1104d31faf3035fd7ae8269d0a97ee43ef4a9a", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1/omniscient-grader.md": "a0ab12ceb3fc26d314b3f674ed6728a6bf5a6a24d2325ed32336020a605d96e5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1/cold-ir-reviewer.md": "ddd2620f17c5311a4a186b5bc229ae3f916d811e4aeb35f215ed7502c31fc8f5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v2/protocol.md": "5f11b043fb0ec18c9c7afba3b729ea1212fe0f88e06220efead48dfd250af562" + }, + "builtArtifactManifest": [ + { + "path": "apps/brunch-agent/dist/app.mjs", + "sha256": "5ce74b2646c00b959b3ee847b47e006717ccc21e1fba769ce818566cba6da62e" + }, + { + "path": "apps/brunch-agent/dist/node-server-BWNSXBme.mjs", + "sha256": "90343929bc5274e0644003e8d7ea69b02003ac4d3b364a0afdb0be0e1032c066" + }, + { + "path": "apps/brunch-agent/dist/server.mjs", + "sha256": "c2d4ccb5aa999e33d33530ba87280e4bb6d6aacd41df630876297bfabea8f04e" + } + ], + "builtArtifactManifestSha256": "5bb67f5cbb1315e789426d83780ed9af23c58b1a04cf14a4b62a831cae435cd0" + }, + "failure": { + "name": "Error", + "message": "The simulated expert returned no text", + "stack": "Error: The simulated expert returned no text\n at askExpert (file:///Users/lunelson/.herdr/worktrees/hash/bravo/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v2-run.ts:492:13)\n at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:105:5)\n at async file:///Users/lunelson/.herdr/worktrees/hash/bravo/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v2-run.ts:564:25" + }, + "transcript": "## User\nI'm the master scheduler at a coatings plant. My boss wants a simulation model of how we\nschedule production, so we can test scheduling decisions before making them. We have tooling\nthat runs Petri-net-style process models, so the end product should be a model I can hand to\nthat — but I can't tell you much about the format, I'm not the modelling person.\n\nPlease interview me about how our operation works, and then produce the model.\n\n## Assistant\nGood — I understand you need a simulation model that lets you test scheduling decisions before implementing them. I'll interview you to understand how your scheduling operation works, then build a model from that.\n\nLet me start with a concrete recent case: **Walk me through the last time you had to schedule a new batch or order — what arrived or triggered it, what did you look at to decide how to fit it in, and what happened next?**\n- tool activate_skill (toolu_01Hu53rTbB2WtXXgzuhhCCV2): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation, review, or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Before substantive\\nelicitation or workpiece revision, read\\n`references/universal-elicitation.md` and `references/profile.md`.\\n\\nFor review, first inspect the supplied workpiece or model. If it already answers\\nthe question, answer without reading the elicitation references or interviewing.\\nIf the review exposes a gap that requires human knowledge, read both elicitation\\nreferences and then ask exactly one focused question that resolves the smallest\\nconsequential gap.\\n\\nRead `templates/workpiece.md` only when first creating or materially revising\\nthe workpiece. Do not load the template merely to inspect an existing artifact,\\nanswer a resolvable review question, or frame the first elicitation question.\\nConstruct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in\\nthis conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview.\\nRead `references/pn-construction.md` and `references/checks.md`, then use the\\nmounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful\\nconstruction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive\\nelicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read\\n`references/pn-construction.md` and `references/checks.md` before beginning.\\nUse mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting\\ndefinition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are\\nabsent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `references/checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted.\\nDeliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the\\nmounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can\\nsupport, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target\\nor current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- references/checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/checks.md\\n- references/pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/pn-construction.md\\n- references/profile.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/profile.md\\n- references/universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/universal-elicitation.md\\n- templates/workpiece.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/templates/workpiece.md\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (toolu_01MjR5Fm6uufmdpFYgYYhumN): \"# Universal Elicitation Reference\\n\\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\\n\\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Work from purpose\\n\\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\\n\\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\\n\\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\\n\\n### Follow the person's account\\n\\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\\n\\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\\n\\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\\n\\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\\n\\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\\n\\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\\n\\n### Treat divergence as information\\n\\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\\n\\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\\n\\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\\n\\n### Stop honestly\\n\\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\\n\\n### Vague or compressed language\\n\\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\\n\\n### Normative language\\n\\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\\n\\n### Tension within or between accounts\\n\\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\\n\\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\\n\\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\\n\\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\\n\\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\\n\\n### Diminishing yield\\n\\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\\n\\n### Assent without independent wording\\n\\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\\n\\n### Silence and absence\\n\\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\\n\\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\\n\\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\\n\\n### Slice a concrete case\\n\\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\\n\\n### Sweep one property\\n\\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\\n\\n### Ask for the last occurrence\\n\\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\\n\\n### Ask for the basis\\n\\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\\n\\n### Ground a term or artifact\\n\\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\\n\\n### Clarify until observable\\n\\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\\n\\n### Use contrastive cases\\n\\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\\n\\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\\n\\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\\n\\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\\n\\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\\n\\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\\n\\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\\n\\n### Restate for correction\\n\\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\\n\\n### Propose structure for correction\\n\\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\\n\\n### Deposit and defer\\n\\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\\n\\n### Press without trapping\\n\\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\\n\\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\\n\\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\\n\\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\\n\\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\\n\\n### Trade concrete outcomes\\n\\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\\n\\n### Close with one correction opportunity\\n\\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\\n\\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\\n\\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\\n\\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\\n\\n### Before asking\\n\\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\\n\\n### Before recording\\n\\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\\n\\n### Before closing\\n\\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (toolu_011E14VjLKmNdTu2F4eVeyTo): \"# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\\n\\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\\n\\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\\n\\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\\n\\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\\n\\n### Keep target structure backstage\\n\\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\\n\\n### Preserve operational context\\n\\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\\n\\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\\n\\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\\n\\n### Language and account signals\\n\\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\\n\\n### Operational situation patterns\\n\\n#### Timed work\\n\\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\\n\\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\\n\\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\\n\\n#### Contended resource\\n\\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\\n\\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\\n\\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\\n\\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\\n\\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\\n\\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\\n\\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\\n\\n#### Mode change\\n\\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\\n\\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\\n\\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\\n\\n#### Spatial transfer\\n\\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\\n\\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\\n\\n#### Policy under pressure\\n\\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\\n\\n#### Hidden waiting\\n\\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\\n\\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\\n\\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\\n\\n### Link the slice to the objective\\n\\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\\n\\n### Expose the process spine\\n\\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\\n\\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\\n\\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\\n\\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\\n\\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\\n\\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\\n\\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\\n\\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\\n\\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\\n\\n### Close a resource account\\n\\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\\n\\n### Close a mode change in both directions\\n\\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\\n\\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\\n\\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\\n\\n### Ask what is conserved\\n\\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\\n\\n### Establish retry scope\\n\\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\\n\\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\\n\\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\\n\\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\\n\\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\\n\\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\\n\\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\\n\\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\\n\\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\\n\\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\\n\\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\\n\\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\\n\\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\\n\\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\\n\\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\\n\\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\\n\\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\\n\\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\\n\\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\\n\\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\\n\\n### Purpose and process\\n\\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\\n\\n### Operational semantics\\n\\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\\n\\n### Quantities and context\\n\\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\\n\"\n\n## User\n*leans back, thinking*\n\nLast real fire was… Friday afternoon, actually. Commercial forwarded a rush order from one of our distributors — needed 800 units of TC-11, that's a mid-blue tint, by Tuesday. Normally that'd be fine, but we were already squeezed.\n\nFirst thing I did was pull up the sheet — I've got the week's runs mapped out by line, with changeovers pencilled in. Line 2 was running whites all weekend, Line 1 had a specialty batch finishing Saturday morning, and Line 3 was on a different tint family. \n\nTC-11 meant I needed a tint-qualified line. Line 3's not signed off for TC-11 yet — quality's still working through the product list — so it was Line 1 or Line 2. Line 2 was mid-run on a big white order for Meridian, and pulling it off early to wash down for tint would've cost me three hours plus scrap, then another washdown back to white. That's dead time I couldn't afford.\n\nSo I looked at Line 1. The specialty was wrapping Saturday around noon. I could squeeze TC-11 in next — it's same tint family as what was queued behind the specialty, so only a quick rinse between them, maybe half an hour. Pushed one of Monday's smaller runs back a few hours, called the distributor, told them Monday afternoon instead of Tuesday morning. They grumbled but took it.\n\nTold the floor at Monday's huddle. Line 1 ran it, came out fine. That's usually how it goes — juggle, squeeze, call somebody.\n\n## Assistant\nThat's helpful — you made a real trade: avoided an expensive mid-run washdown on Line 2 by using Line 1's opening and pushing something else. \n\nYou mentioned **tint families** matter for how long a changeover takes. Help me understand that: what makes two products part of the same tint family, and what actually changes about the changeover when you're staying in the same family versus switching between families?\n\n## User\n*nods*\n\nRight, so there's three families: **base whites**, **tinted colours**, and **specialty clears**. It's about what goes into them and what residue they leave.\n\nBase whites are just that — titanium white pigment, no colour tints. Tinted colours have chromatic pigments added at the letdown stage — blues, reds, greens, earth tones, whatever. Specialty clears are thick formulations, different resin system entirely, no pigment at all — they're for industrial gloss coats.\n\nWhen you stay **inside a family**, it's a quick rinse — maybe 20, 30 minutes. You're flushing out one white for another white, or one tint shade for another tint shade. The lines can handle trace carryover, QA doesn't flinch.\n\n**Switching families** is where it gets expensive. If you go white to tint, that's about 45 minutes — you need to get the line properly clean so the white residue doesn't dilute the colour. But tint back to white? That's the killer — full washdown, around three hours. Any pigment carryover into a white batch shows up, and we can't ship it. QA will reject it, or worse, a customer sees streaks. So you scrub everything: mix tank, mill, letdown lines, the whole train.\n\nSpecialty in or out, either direction, is about two hours. Different chemistry, you've got to purge the resin system thoroughly or you get adhesion problems downstream.\n\nThe changeover crew does all of it — same two techs, day shift. If two lines need washing at once, somebody waits.\n\n## Assistant\nGood — so the changeover time isn't symmetric, and tint back to white is the expensive direction you want to avoid. That three-hour washdown is what you dodged by using Line 1 instead of pulling Line 2 off the Meridian white order.\n\nYou mentioned Line 3 wasn't signed off for TC-11 yet. Let me understand **what each line can actually run**: How many production lines do you have total, and what determines which products each line is allowed or qualified to make?\n\n## User\n*counts on fingers*\n\nThree lines total. They're all the same stages — mix, mill, tint-letdown, fill-and-pack — but they're not identical and they're not all qualified for everything.\n\n**Line 1** is the old workhorse. Slower, but it's qualified for the full product list — all the whites, all the tints, all the specialty clears. If there's a fussy product or something new, it goes on Line 1 first.\n\n**Line 2** is the fast line, built for volume. It runs whites beautifully — that's where all the big Meridian orders go. It can run tints too, but we've never piped it for the clear resins, so no specialty. Line 2 is whites and tints only.\n\n**Line 3** is the newest — quick, modern, still being qualified product by product. Quality and engineering are working through the SKU list one at a time, running validation batches. Right now it's cleared for most of the whites, some of the tints, and a couple of the specialty clears. But not all of them yet — TC-11's one of the tint SKUs still on the \"not yet\" list. It's a rolling thing; every few weeks another product gets signed off.\n\nSo when I'm slotting an order, I've got to check what's qualified where. Sometimes that boxes me in — like Friday, TC-11 meant Line 1 or nothing, because Line 2 doesn't do specialty and Line 3 isn't approved yet.\n\n## Assistant\nUnderstood — so Line 1 is universal but slower, Line 2 is fast but whites and tints only, and Line 3 is still being opened up product by product. That qualification constraint was binding when TC-11 arrived.\n\nLet me understand what actually happens once you've assigned an order to a qualified line. **Take that TC-11 run on Line 1**: after the specialty batch finished Saturday and you did the quick rinse, what happened during the TC-11 run itself — what stages did it go through, roughly how long did it take, and what made the line unavailable for anything else?", + "rawConversationSnapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1GY81MZBEJM8R1G89M214CC", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000097", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFHWTgxTVhRSEVXU1FGSzVROEhGR0JW", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GY81MXQHEWSQFK5Q8HFGBV", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'm the master scheduler at a coatings plant. My boss wants a simulation model of how we\nschedule production, so we can test scheduling decisions before making them. We have tooling\nthat runs Petri-net-style process models, so the end product should be a model I can hand to\nthat — but I can't tell you much about the format, I'm not the modelling person.\n\nPlease interview me about how our operation works, and then produce the model.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1GY82YBK21BMQ2JTT3HXHT0", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GY81MXQHEWSQFK5Q8HFGBV", + "turnId": "turn_01M1GY81NP21YW0WJZG3BJ7GCX", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The person is a master scheduler at a coatings plant who needs a simulation model of their production scheduling process. They mention:\n1. Purpose: Test scheduling decisions before implementing them\n2. Target format: Petri-net-style process models (their tooling runs these)\n3. They're not the modeling person, so won't know technical details about the format\n4. They want me to interview them and produce the model\n\nThis clearly matches the \"sdcpn-modelling\" skill description: \"Elicit, review, or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct an inspected SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available.\"\n\nBefore I begin substantive elicitation, I should activate the skill as instructed: \"Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction.\"\n\nLet me activate that skill first.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01Hu53rTbB2WtXXgzuhhCCV2", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation, review, or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Before substantive\nelicitation or workpiece revision, read\n`references/universal-elicitation.md` and `references/profile.md`.\n\nFor review, first inspect the supplied workpiece or model. If it already answers\nthe question, answer without reading the elicitation references or interviewing.\nIf the review exposes a gap that requires human knowledge, read both elicitation\nreferences and then ask exactly one focused question that resolves the smallest\nconsequential gap.\n\nRead `templates/workpiece.md` only when first creating or materially revising\nthe workpiece. Do not load the template merely to inspect an existing artifact,\nanswer a resolvable review question, or frame the first elicitation question.\nConstruct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in\nthis conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview.\nRead `references/pn-construction.md` and `references/checks.md`, then use the\nmounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful\nconstruction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive\nelicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read\n`references/pn-construction.md` and `references/checks.md` before beginning.\nUse mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting\ndefinition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are\nabsent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `references/checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted.\nDeliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the\nmounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can\nsupport, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target\nor current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- references/checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/checks.md\n- references/pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/pn-construction.md\n- references/profile.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/profile.md\n- references/universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/universal-elicitation.md\n- templates/workpiece.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/templates/workpiece.md\n", + "durationMs": 4 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good, I've activated the skill. Now I need to proceed with the skill instructions:\n\n1. **Select the runtime branch**: This is \"Interactive elicitation, review, or revision\" - they want me to interview them and produce the model.\n\n2. **Before substantive elicitation**, I need to read:\n - `references/universal-elicitation.md`\n - `references/profile.md`\n\n3. I should read `templates/workpiece.md` only when first creating or materially revising the workpiece.\n\n4. **Orient**: I should establish purpose and context first.\n\nLet me read the two elicitation references before I begin interviewing.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01MjR5Fm6uufmdpFYgYYhumN", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/universal-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_011E14VjLKmNdTu2F4eVeyTo", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/profile.md" + }, + "output": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good, now I have the elicitation guidance. Let me now start the interview. According to the skill instructions:\n\n1. **Orient**: I should establish purpose and context first - the intended question/decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time.\n\n2. **Use the person's vocabulary** and follow concrete cases rather than abstract tours.\n\n3. **Do not open with a battery of independent questions** - ask one coherent, answerable opening question.\n\n4. **Accumulate posture conversationally** - don't present an intake form.\n\nFrom their opening statement, I know:\n- **Purpose**: Test scheduling decisions before making them\n- **Audience**: Presumably the boss and master scheduler (them)\n- **They are the master scheduler** at a coatings plant\n- **End product**: Petri-net-style process model\n\nI should start with one focused question that helps me understand their operation better. A good opening would be to follow one concrete case - perhaps asking them about a recent or typical scheduling situation that would help expose the structure of what they schedule, how they schedule it, and what decisions matter.\n\nLet me craft a single opening question that's concrete and answerable.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good — I understand you need a simulation model that lets you test scheduling decisions before implementing them. I'll interview you to understand how your scheduling operation works, then build a model from that.\n\nLet me start with a concrete recent case: **Walk me through the last time you had to schedule a new batch or order — what arrived or triggered it, what did you look at to decide how to fit it in, and what happened next?**", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFHWTlDQUVWUDNDVlRDNVo2WDM0RzhY", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GY9CAEVP3CVTC5Z6X34G8X", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "*leans back, thinking*\n\nLast real fire was… Friday afternoon, actually. Commercial forwarded a rush order from one of our distributors — needed 800 units of TC-11, that's a mid-blue tint, by Tuesday. Normally that'd be fine, but we were already squeezed.\n\nFirst thing I did was pull up the sheet — I've got the week's runs mapped out by line, with changeovers pencilled in. Line 2 was running whites all weekend, Line 1 had a specialty batch finishing Saturday morning, and Line 3 was on a different tint family. \n\nTC-11 meant I needed a tint-qualified line. Line 3's not signed off for TC-11 yet — quality's still working through the product list — so it was Line 1 or Line 2. Line 2 was mid-run on a big white order for Meridian, and pulling it off early to wash down for tint would've cost me three hours plus scrap, then another washdown back to white. That's dead time I couldn't afford.\n\nSo I looked at Line 1. The specialty was wrapping Saturday around noon. I could squeeze TC-11 in next — it's same tint family as what was queued behind the specialty, so only a quick rinse between them, maybe half an hour. Pushed one of Monday's smaller runs back a few hours, called the distributor, told them Monday afternoon instead of Tuesday morning. They grumbled but took it.\n\nTold the floor at Monday's huddle. Line 1 ran it, came out fine. That's usually how it goes — juggle, squeeze, call somebody.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1GY9EKN8B2XW83Q0F6Q333A", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GY9CAEVP3CVTC5Z6X34G8X", + "turnId": "turn_01M1GY9CAM2FNGX0HT4DH38NTR", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "This is a rich concrete case. Let me capture the key operational elements:\n\n1. **Trigger**: Rush order from distributor (external, unplanned)\n2. **Decision process**: Master scheduler looks at current schedule, evaluates options based on:\n - Line availability\n - Product qualifications (Line 3 not qualified for TC-11)\n - Changeover/washdown costs (time + scrap)\n - Tint family compatibility (affects changeover duration)\n - Impact on existing commitments\n\n3. **Resources**: Multiple lines (1, 2, 3) with:\n - Different states (running, finishing)\n - Different qualifications\n - Different current products/families\n\n4. **Activities**: Production runs, changeovers/washdowns with varying durations\n5. **Constraints**: Product-line qualifications, tint family compatibility\n6. **Time-based decisions**: Weighing changeover costs vs. schedule displacement\n\nKey operational vocabulary:\n- Lines (numbered)\n- Runs/batches\n- Tint families\n- Changeover, washdown, rinse (different types/durations)\n- Scrap (associated with early pull-off)\n- Specialty vs. standard products\n- Product qualification\n\nI should follow up on aspects that connect to the simulation objective. The boss wants to test scheduling decisions - so I need to understand:\n- What makes a schedule \"better\" or \"worse\"?\n- What are the typical decision points?\n- What varies (arrival patterns, durations, line states)?\n- What are the practiced rules vs. documented rules?\n\nGood next questions could explore:\n- The tint family concept and its impact on changeovers\n- Line qualifications and how they constrain choices\n- Changeover types and their costs (time, scrap)\n- What normally triggers scheduling decisions\n- How outcomes are judged (what makes a good schedule?)\n\nI should stay in operational vocabulary and follow this thread rather than jumping to a different topic. \n\nThe tint family and changeover mechanics seem central to how the scheduler actually decides between lines, so that's worth pushing on next.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "That's helpful — you made a real trade: avoided an expensive mid-run washdown on Line 2 by using Line 1's opening and pushing something else. \n\nYou mentioned **tint families** matter for how long a changeover takes. Help me understand that: what makes two products part of the same tint family, and what actually changes about the changeover when you're staying in the same family versus switching between families?", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFHWUFIU0pEUlcyODg3R0EwRzlGRDcz", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GYAHSJDRW2887GA0G9FD73", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "*nods*\n\nRight, so there's three families: **base whites**, **tinted colours**, and **specialty clears**. It's about what goes into them and what residue they leave.\n\nBase whites are just that — titanium white pigment, no colour tints. Tinted colours have chromatic pigments added at the letdown stage — blues, reds, greens, earth tones, whatever. Specialty clears are thick formulations, different resin system entirely, no pigment at all — they're for industrial gloss coats.\n\nWhen you stay **inside a family**, it's a quick rinse — maybe 20, 30 minutes. You're flushing out one white for another white, or one tint shade for another tint shade. The lines can handle trace carryover, QA doesn't flinch.\n\n**Switching families** is where it gets expensive. If you go white to tint, that's about 45 minutes — you need to get the line properly clean so the white residue doesn't dilute the colour. But tint back to white? That's the killer — full washdown, around three hours. Any pigment carryover into a white batch shows up, and we can't ship it. QA will reject it, or worse, a customer sees streaks. So you scrub everything: mix tank, mill, letdown lines, the whole train.\n\nSpecialty in or out, either direction, is about two hours. Different chemistry, you've got to purge the resin system thoroughly or you get adhesion problems downstream.\n\nThe changeover crew does all of it — same two techs, day shift. If two lines need washing at once, somebody waits.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1GYAK9TF5QEYQE8SQVVXXQA", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GYAHSJDRW2887GA0G9FD73", + "turnId": "turn_01M1GYAHSNQSJ0QSXT0KR0NGTA", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Okay, that's a very useful distinction. Let me capture what I learned:\n\n1. Three product families:\n - Base whites (titanium white, no color)\n - Tinted colours (chromatic pigments)\n - Specialty clears (different resin, no pigment, industrial gloss)\n\n2. Changeover duration depends on direction and families:\n - Within same family: 20-30 min (quick rinse)\n - White → Tint: 45 min\n - Tint → White: 3 hours (full washdown, quality concern about pigment in white)\n - Specialty ↔ anything: 2 hours either direction (different chemistry)\n\n3. Changeover is performed by a dedicated crew: 2 techs, day shift only\n - This is a contended resource! If two lines need changeover simultaneously, one waits.\n\nImportant operational details:\n- Quality concerns drive the asymmetry (tint→white is expensive because contamination shows)\n- The changeover resource is limited and shared\n\nNow I should understand more about:\n- The lines themselves (how many, what can each do?)\n- What happens during production runs (duration, batch sizes, what determines them?)\n- What are the typical queued orders like?\n- What constraints exist around scheduling?\n\nLet me ask about the lines and their capabilities next, since Line 3 was mentioned as \"not signed off for TC-11 yet\" — there seems to be product qualification per line.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good — so the changeover time isn't symmetric, and tint back to white is the expensive direction you want to avoid. That three-hour washdown is what you dodged by using Line 1 instead of pulling Line 2 off the Meridian white order.\n\nYou mentioned Line 3 wasn't signed off for TC-11 yet. Let me understand **what each line can actually run**: How many production lines do you have total, and what determines which products each line is allowed or qualified to make?", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFHWUI4SDNEREdKRE44NEYzVDM5UUM1", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GYB8H3DDGJDN84F3T39QC5", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "*counts on fingers*\n\nThree lines total. They're all the same stages — mix, mill, tint-letdown, fill-and-pack — but they're not identical and they're not all qualified for everything.\n\n**Line 1** is the old workhorse. Slower, but it's qualified for the full product list — all the whites, all the tints, all the specialty clears. If there's a fussy product or something new, it goes on Line 1 first.\n\n**Line 2** is the fast line, built for volume. It runs whites beautifully — that's where all the big Meridian orders go. It can run tints too, but we've never piped it for the clear resins, so no specialty. Line 2 is whites and tints only.\n\n**Line 3** is the newest — quick, modern, still being qualified product by product. Quality and engineering are working through the SKU list one at a time, running validation batches. Right now it's cleared for most of the whites, some of the tints, and a couple of the specialty clears. But not all of them yet — TC-11's one of the tint SKUs still on the \"not yet\" list. It's a rolling thing; every few weeks another product gets signed off.\n\nSo when I'm slotting an order, I've got to check what's qualified where. Sometimes that boxes me in — like Friday, TC-11 meant Line 1 or nothing, because Line 2 doesn't do specialty and Line 3 isn't approved yet.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1GYBBQ6CZR2NG610QQR1C71", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GYB8H3DDGJDN84F3T39QC5", + "turnId": "turn_01M1GYB8H88SEDK5NC51NPVVXD", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good, so we have:\n- 3 lines with different capabilities\n- Line 1: full qualification (whites, tints, specialty)\n- Line 2: whites and tints only (no specialty)\n- Line 3: partial and evolving qualification - some whites, some tints, some specialty; TC-11 specifically not yet qualified\n\nLine qualification is a hard constraint on assignment.\n\nNow I want to understand the flow of work through a line. I should understand:\n- What actually happens when a batch runs on a line\n- How long it takes (and does that vary?)\n- What resources are involved\n- When the line is unavailable/occupied\n\nLet me ask about the production run itself, not just the changeover.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Understood — so Line 1 is universal but slower, Line 2 is fast but whites and tints only, and Line 3 is still being opened up product by product. That qualification constraint was binding when TC-11 arrived.\n\nLet me understand what actually happens once you've assigned an order to a qualified line. **Take that TC-11 run on Line 1**: after the specialty batch finished Saturday and you did the quick rinse, what happened during the TC-11 run itself — what stages did it go through, roughly how long did it take, and what made the line unavailable for anything else?", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GY81MXQHEWSQFK5Q8HFGBV", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1GY81MXQHEWSQFK5Q8HFGBV" + }, + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GY9CAEVP3CVTC5Z6X34G8X", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1GY9CAEVP3CVTC5Z6X34G8X" + }, + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GYAHSJDRW2887GA0G9FD73", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1GYAHSJDRW2887GA0G9FD73" + }, + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GYB8H3DDGJDN84F3T39QC5", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1GYB8H3DDGJDN84F3T39QC5" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1GY81MYS7RNBTTB9RP5EWVW" + }, + "rawConversationSnapshotSha256": "75366f983a3afa137496b64706447292469d0bae8c8961c895a17cfa107af6be" +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v2/protocol.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v2/protocol.md index 78bd60453de..6d2b50297ed 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v2/protocol.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v2/protocol.md @@ -1,12 +1,14 @@ # Prospective runbook candidate v2 -Status: **frozen candidate protocol; not executed** +Status: **aborted after two immutable invalid members** Protocol id: `prospective-runbook-v2` Observed-output namespace: `vestera-prospective-candidate-v2` This protocol drives the built production `ChatAgent` against the same Vestera case and frozen ruler as the immutable Mission 3 control. It creates three independent candidate members for comparison with that control. It does not alter, replace, or add members to `vestera-prospective-baseline-v1`, and it does not authorize paid calls or grading. +Execution stopped after replication 1 inherited a stale credential and replication 2 encountered a simulated-expert refusal before workpiece delivery. The owner subsequently narrowed the Mission 4 question to workpiece-quality scoring against the latest valid flat-prompt controls. Preserve the v2 artifacts as operational evidence; do not run replication 3 or use v2 as the quality campaign. The replacement is [`prospective-runbook-v3`](../prospective-runbook-v3/protocol.md). + ## Frozen campaign configuration | Setting | Value | diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v3/protocol.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v3/protocol.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..74d96ae098d --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v3/protocol.md @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ +# Mission 4 architecture scoring v3 + +Status: **frozen scoring protocol; not executed** + +Protocol id: `prospective-runbook-v3` +Observed-output namespace: `vestera-architecture-candidate-v3` + +This protocol scores the owner-selected Mission 4 prompt, skill, progressive-disclosure, and workpiece architecture against only the latest valid flat-prompt control workpieces. It does not aggregate historical side quests, draft families, or every previous runbook design. The aborted v2 campaign remains operational evidence and is not a quality baseline. + +## Comparison target + +The immutable quality control is exactly these two valid members of `vestera-prospective-baseline-v1`: + +- `runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-50-28-709Z-20a4817f` +- `runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-56-34-754Z-4b75737c` + +Their frozen omniscient range is `66.3–80.0 / 100`; their cold-utility range is `3.3–3.5 / 4`; both have conditional downstream readiness and no hard-failure gate. Their workpieces, grade reports, and campaign adjudication are hashed into the v3 instrument. + +Quality scoring is conditional on a recoverable, valid workpiece on both sides. Runtime validity, simulator refusal, cost, and latency are reported separately and may not be converted into workpiece-quality points or used to alter either quality population. + +## Frozen campaign configuration + +| Setting | Value | +| --- | --- | +| Case | `vestera-scheduling` | +| Opening message | `../../cases/vestera-scheduling/opening-message.md` | +| Expert pack | `../../cases/vestera-scheduling/situation-pack.md` | +| Prospective ledger | `../../oracles/vestera-scheduling/truth-ledger-v1-prospective.yaml` | +| Quality ruler | `../../oracles/ir-quality-ruler-v1.md` | +| Interviewer | built production `ChatAgent`, requested model `claude-sonnet-4-5` | +| Simulated expert | requested model `claude-sonnet-4-5` | +| Interview turns | 8 before the final workpiece request | +| Per-logical-turn latency stop | 180,000 ms | +| Replications | 3 independent conversations, numbered 1–3 | +| Sampling | provider default; no seed | +| Omniscient grader | frozen `../ir-quality-ruler-v1/omniscient-grader.md`, fresh context per valid run | +| Cold reviewer | frozen `../ir-quality-ruler-v1/cold-ir-reviewer.md`, separate fresh context per valid run | +| Observed output | `../../../docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/` | + +This mirrors the flat-prompt control's three-invocation shape and seeks a two-workpiece quality population. It does not replace an invalid replication to reach that population. Changing a frozen value requires a new protocol and namespace. + +## Preconditions and freeze + +The owner-approved Mission 4 budget ceiling is US$10 across candidate and grader calls. Before creating a replication, the runner applies every free path, configuration, clean-instrument, fingerprint, and namespace guard, then makes a one-token credential/model-availability preflight outside campaign membership. A failed preflight creates no member. Successful preflight cost still counts against the owner ceiling. + +The runner hashes the complete candidate source and lock scope, complete built-server `dist/*.mjs` manifest, comparison-target artifacts, case, ledger, ruler, grader prompts, and this protocol. The first member fixes the fingerprint. Later members must match it exactly. + +The runner categorically rejects the immutable flat-prompt namespace and descendants after real-path canonicalization. Hermetic overrides remain restricted to the checked-in faux fixtures and cannot receive an API key. + +## Paid commands + +After a clean post-commit hermetic proof, run sequentially: + +```sh +BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_REPLICATION=1 yarn workspace @apps/brunch-agent runbook:elicit:architecture-v3 +BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_REPLICATION=2 yarn workspace @apps/brunch-agent runbook:elicit:architecture-v3 +BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_REPLICATION=3 yarn workspace @apps/brunch-agent runbook:elicit:architecture-v3 +``` + +Each command builds the application, preflights the provider, uses a fresh Flue conversation and temporary database, and writes an immutable artifact stem. + +## Validity and evidence semantics + +- The opening dispatch counts as interview turn 1. +- After eight interviewer turns or an earlier latency/empty-text stop, a labelled non-evidence stop instruction requests the current `runbook-ir` workpiece. +- A valid quality member must contain a recoverable workpiece and no ordinary-path violation. +- Construction/capture tool use, construction-resource reads, undeclared tools/resources, or a missing workpiece make the candidate member invalid. +- Provider, simulator, interviewer, application, persistence, and cleanup failures remain immutable operational evidence. +- Human adjudication attributes failures by observed boundary. A simulated-expert refusal is not silently charged to candidate workpiece quality; a candidate failure is not silently relabelled as simulator failure. +- No invalid member is deleted, replaced, or graded as a workpiece. + +## Artifacts + +Completed and invalid runs retain the exact raw Flue snapshot and hash, readable transcript, selected workpiece and source-message binding when available, expert exchange, requested/observed model and stop metadata, costs, resource/tool traces, violations, configuration, comparison target, and complete instrument manifest. Runtime and cleanup failures use distinct nonce-bearing records so retention cannot mask the originating failure. + +The v2 artifacts remain in `vestera-prospective-candidate-v2/` with an abort adjudication. They are neither moved into v3 nor used as flat-prompt controls. + +## Grading and adjudication + +For each valid v3 workpiece: + +1. Give a fresh omniscient context exactly the frozen omniscient prompt, situation pack, prospective ledger, exact source conversation, and workpiece. +2. Give a separate fresh cold context exactly the frozen cold prompt, opening message, and workpiece. +3. Retain exact requested and observed grader identity and both reports. +4. Human-review hard failures, genuine disagreement, every `NEW-*` mistake, and failure attribution. +5. Compare candidate score vectors, mistake classes, cold utility, and readiness only with the two named flat-prompt controls. Report ranges and individual members; do not collapse either side to a mean. +6. Report completion, simulator/provider failures, cost, token use, and latency in a separate operational section. From 79529cb12b4c77174e33807fb346601ff5033f80 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 14:27:24 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 041/101] Close Brunch Mission 4 with accepted evidence Retain the flat-prompt comparison, repaired local product witness, and exact Mission 5 handoff while archiving authority and preserving explicit limitations. Co-authored-by: Cursor --- apps/brunch-agent/package.json | 1 + .../runbook/grade-architecture-v3.ts | 191 +++++ libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md | 14 +- libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/README.md | 7 +- .../campaign-adjudication.md | 64 ++ .../mission-5-handoff.md | 54 ++ .../product-witness-initial.png | Bin 0 -> 4254 bytes .../product-witness-rebuilt.png | Bin 0 -> 159295 bytes .../product-witness-repaired.png | Bin 0 -> 98323 bytes .../product-witness-workpiece.png | Bin 0 -> 102265 bytes .../product-witness.md | 64 ++ ...2T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.cold-attempt-2.md | 126 +++ ...-53-281Z-3b64f006.cold-attempt-2.meta.json | 44 + ...-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.cold.md | 30 + ...9-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.cold.meta.json | 43 + ...-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.ir.md | 314 +++++++ ...n-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.json | 796 ++++++++++++++++++ ...ion-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.md | 492 +++++++++++ ...09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.omniscient.md | 131 +++ ...1-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.omniscient.meta.json | 45 + ...-48-37-582Z-e5b05f81.failure-6b1d68ed.json | 401 +++++++++ ...-50-29-634Z-05f070e9.failure-b98107fe.json | 542 ++++++++++++ .../implementations/mission-4-close.md | 84 ++ ...ed-prompt-skill-workpiece-architecture.md} | 12 +- .../docs/mission-archive/README.md | 1 + .../mission-drafts/5-capture-backed-review.md | 8 +- .../mission-drafts/6-traceable-projection.md | 2 +- .../7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md | 4 +- .../mission-drafts/9-optimisation-handoff.md | 2 +- .../docs/mission-drafts/README.md | 2 +- .../core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md | 27 - .../ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md | 214 ----- .../ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md | 11 - .../plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md | 50 -- .../sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md | 127 --- .../sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md | 222 ----- .../plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md | 116 --- .../sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md | 106 --- .../skills/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md | 2 +- .../test/sdcpn-modelling-skill.test.ts | 3 + 40 files changed, 3455 insertions(+), 897 deletions(-) create mode 100644 apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/grade-architecture-v3.ts create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/campaign-adjudication.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/mission-5-handoff.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/product-witness-initial.png create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/product-witness-rebuilt.png create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/product-witness-repaired.png create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/product-witness-workpiece.png create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/product-witness.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.cold-attempt-2.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.cold-attempt-2.meta.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.cold.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.cold.meta.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.ir.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.omniscient.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.omniscient.meta.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-2-2026-09-02T11-48-37-582Z-e5b05f81.failure-6b1d68ed.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-3-2026-09-02T11-50-29-634Z-05f070e9.failure-b98107fe.json create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/implementations/mission-4-close.md rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/{MISSION.md => docs/mission-archive/4-accepted-prompt-skill-workpiece-architecture.md} (88%) delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/package.json b/apps/brunch-agent/package.json index c67ad08d034..9301f5390d9 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/package.json +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/package.json @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ "runbook:elicit": "vite build && node --experimental-strip-types src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts", "runbook:elicit:architecture-v3": "vite build && node --experimental-strip-types src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v3-run.ts", "runbook:elicit:candidate-v2": "vite build && node --experimental-strip-types src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v2-run.ts", + "runbook:grade:architecture-v3": "node --experimental-strip-types src/evaluations/runbook/grade-architecture-v3.ts", "runbook:headless": "vite build && node --experimental-strip-types src/evaluations/runbook/construction-run.ts", "test:unit": "vitest run --config vitest.config.ts", "transcript": "node --experimental-strip-types src/diagnostics/transcript-cli.ts" diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/grade-architecture-v3.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/grade-architecture-v3.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c9adbe72045 --- /dev/null +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/grade-architecture-v3.ts @@ -0,0 +1,191 @@ +import { createHash, randomUUID } from "node:crypto"; +import { readFile, writeFile } from "node:fs/promises"; +import { basename, join, resolve } from "node:path"; + +import Anthropic from "@anthropic-ai/sdk"; + +const repositoryRootPath = resolve(import.meta.dirname, "../../../../.."); +const candidateDirectory = join( + repositoryRootPath, + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3", +); +const requestedModel = "claude-sonnet-4-5"; +const mode = process.env["BRUNCH_ARCHITECTURE_GRADER_MODE"]; +const artifactBaseInput = process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ARTIFACT_BASE"]; +const attempt = process.env["BRUNCH_ARCHITECTURE_GRADER_ATTEMPT"]; + +if (mode !== "omniscient" && mode !== "cold") { + throw new Error( + "BRUNCH_ARCHITECTURE_GRADER_MODE must be omniscient or cold.", + ); +} +if (artifactBaseInput === undefined) { + throw new Error("BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ARTIFACT_BASE is required."); +} +if (!process.env["ANTHROPIC_API_KEY"]) { + throw new Error("ANTHROPIC_API_KEY is required."); +} +if (attempt !== undefined && !/^[2-9][0-9]*$/u.test(attempt)) { + throw new Error( + "BRUNCH_ARCHITECTURE_GRADER_ATTEMPT must be an integer of at least 2.", + ); +} + +const artifactBase = resolve(artifactBaseInput); +if ( + artifactBase !== join(candidateDirectory, basename(artifactBase)) || + !basename(artifactBase).startsWith("prospective-runbook-v3-replication-") +) { + throw new Error( + "The grader accepts only a v3 artifact in the frozen candidate namespace.", + ); +} + +interface CandidateRecord { + readonly campaignFingerprint: string; + readonly comparisonTarget: unknown; + readonly runId: string; + readonly status: string; + readonly transcript: string; + readonly workpiece?: { + readonly content: string; + readonly sha256: string; + }; +} + +const record = JSON.parse( + await readFile(`${artifactBase}.json`, "utf8"), +) as CandidateRecord; +if (record.status !== "completed" || record.workpiece === undefined) { + throw new Error("Only a completed v3 workpiece may be graded."); +} + +const sha256 = (content: string): string => + createHash("sha256").update(content).digest("hex"); +const ir = (await readFile(`${artifactBase}.ir.md`, "utf8")).trimEnd(); +if (ir !== record.workpiece.content || sha256(ir) !== record.workpiece.sha256) { + throw new Error( + "The selected workpiece does not match its candidate record.", + ); +} + +const artifact = async ( + relativePath: string, + content?: string, +): Promise<{ readonly path: string; readonly content: string }> => ({ + path: relativePath, + content: + content ?? (await readFile(join(repositoryRootPath, relativePath), "utf8")), +}); + +const graderPromptPath = + mode === "omniscient" + ? "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1/omniscient-grader.md" + : "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1/cold-ir-reviewer.md"; +const graderInstructions = await readFile( + join(repositoryRootPath, graderPromptPath), + "utf8", +); +const inputs = + mode === "omniscient" + ? [ + await artifact( + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/situation-pack.md", + ), + await artifact( + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/vestera-scheduling/truth-ledger-v1-prospective.yaml", + ), + await artifact( + `${basename(artifactBase)}.transcript.md`, + record.transcript, + ), + await artifact(`${basename(artifactBase)}.ir.md`, ir), + ] + : [ + await artifact( + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/opening-message.md", + ), + await artifact(`${basename(artifactBase)}.ir.md`, ir), + ]; + +const userPrompt = [ + `Grade run ${record.runId}.`, + `Exactly ${inputs.length} artifact contents follow. Treat each declared path as its identity and use no other evidence.`, + ...inputs.map( + (input, index) => + `\n--- artifact ${index + 1}: ${input.path} (sha256 ${sha256(input.content)}) ---\n${input.content}\n--- end artifact ${index + 1} ---`, + ), +].join("\n"); + +const response = await new Anthropic({ + maxRetries: 2, + timeout: 10 * 60 * 1000, +}).messages.create({ + model: requestedModel, + max_tokens: 16_000, + thinking: { type: "disabled" }, + system: graderInstructions, + messages: [{ role: "user", content: userPrompt }], +}); +const report = response.content + .filter( + ( + block, + ): block is Extract<(typeof response.content)[number], { type: "text" }> => + block.type === "text" && typeof block.text === "string", + ) + .map((block) => block.text) + .join("\n") + .trim(); +if (report.length === 0) { + throw new Error(`The ${mode} grader returned no report.`); +} + +const outputSuffix = + attempt === undefined ? mode : `${mode}-attempt-${attempt}`; +const reportPath = `${artifactBase}.${outputSuffix}.md`; +const metadataPath = `${artifactBase}.${outputSuffix}.meta.json`; +await writeFile(reportPath, `${report}\n`, { flag: "wx" }); +await writeFile( + metadataPath, + `${JSON.stringify( + { + schemaVersion: 1, + protocolId: "prospective-runbook-v3", + runId: record.runId, + campaignFingerprint: record.campaignFingerprint, + comparisonTarget: record.comparisonTarget, + mode, + attempt: attempt === undefined ? 1 : Number(attempt), + graderPromptPath, + graderPromptSha256: sha256(graderInstructions), + inputSha256: Object.fromEntries( + inputs.map((input) => [input.path, sha256(input.content)]), + ), + requestSha256: sha256(userPrompt), + requestedModel, + observedModel: response.model, + stopReason: response.stop_reason, + usage: response.usage, + reportPath, + reportSha256: sha256(report), + completedAt: new Date().toISOString(), + nonce: randomUUID(), + }, + null, + 2, + )}\n`, + { flag: "wx" }, +); + +process.stdout.write( + `ARCHITECTURE_V3_GRADE ${JSON.stringify({ + mode, + runId: record.runId, + requestedModel, + observedModel: response.model, + stopReason: response.stop_reason, + reportPath, + metadataPath, + })}\n`, +); diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md index 5a67835a9b8..334732eb8af 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md @@ -1,25 +1,25 @@ # Brunch future mission spine -> Canonical future-planning spine, shared frame, and backlog index only. This file is not execution authority and authorizes no implementation. [`MISSION.md`](MISSION.md) is the sole live authority. Detailed provisional clusters are context repositories, not missions; re-evaluate and convert one into `MISSION.md` before acting. +> Canonical future-planning spine, shared frame, and backlog index only. This file is not execution authority and authorizes no implementation. No mission is live after Mission 4 close; re-evaluate one draft and create a new `MISSION.md` on its own issue, branch, and PR before acting. This spine and its four linked drafts form one future-planning record. Keep each consequential meaning in one authoritative planning home: shared contracts and unallocated concerns live here; mission-specific detail lives in its draft. A spine pointer is not a second contract. Material omitted from a future cut returns to this record at full fidelity, and the consumed draft is removed. ## Current authority and accepted spine -Mission 4 remains live on this branch. Its exit handoff is a selected frozen workpiece, exact source Flue conversation, exact candidate-instrument manifest, and comparative evaluation/adjudication. The parallel deployment branch's decision to archive Mission 4 and install Mission 8 as live authority is historical to that branch and is **not imported here**. +Mission 4 closed on 2026-09-02. Its [archive](docs/mission-archive/4-accepted-prompt-skill-workpiece-architecture.md) and [Mission 5 handoff](docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/mission-5-handoff.md) freeze the selected workpiece, exact source Flue snapshot, candidate manifest, comparative adjudication, visible witness, and accepted limitations. The parallel deployment branch's decision to install Mission 8 as live authority remains historical to that branch and is **not imported here**. -Mission 4's `Deferred` paragraph was intentionally left unchanged by this documentation remediation and therefore retains the pre-split future numbering (projection/provenance as Mission 5, revision as Mission 6, rehearsal/handoff as Mission 7). This owner-ratified planning remediation supersedes only those future planning addresses with the accepted spine below; it does not alter Mission 4's live imperative, architecture, proof, or constraints. When a successor is eventually cut, use the linked draft numbering below and re-evaluate it into `MISSION.md`; do not infer that the unchanged `Deferred` labels authorize implementation. +Mission 5 is the next candidate, not a live mission. Re-evaluate its linked draft against the frozen handoff and current deployment reality before cutting separate execution authority. ```text -M4 live — ship the accepted prompt/skill/workpiece architecture -M5 capture-backed review — ship a mechanical-evidence “why” answer over an honest prebuilt pair +M4 closed — accepted prompt/skill/workpiece architecture, with explicit limitations +M5 next draft — capture-backed review over an honest prebuilt pair M6 automatic projection — ship one meaningful region of traceable live SDCPN projection M7 revision — ship bounded authorized reviewer revision and a scoped patch M8 deployment handoff — stopped after local application proof, before infrastructure deployment M9 optimisation — ship an accepted optimisation handoff after its consumer contract exists ``` -Every numbered mission from Mission 4 onward must produce a distinct visible advancement through the deployed Petrinaut/Brunch boundary once that boundary exists. Architecture, schema repair, fixtures, evaluation, rehearsal, and spikes may support that advancement but cannot be its sole outcome. Parallel work means separate issue, branch, PR, and mission authority; it never means multiple live missions here. +Every numbered mission from Mission 5 onward must produce a distinct visible advancement through the deployed Petrinaut/Brunch boundary once that boundary exists. Architecture, schema repair, fixtures, evaluation, rehearsal, and spikes may support that advancement but cannot be its sole outcome. Parallel work means separate issue, branch, PR, and mission authority; it never means multiple live missions here. ## FE-1476 product frame @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ The candidate split has one live authority, one compact spine, four provisional | Standing decisions | Shared constraints and standing locks | Retained with packaged-B disposition, authority boundaries, capture/workpiece separation, platform locks, and no generalized runtime/TUI. | | Structured-question semantics from accepted planning | Unallocated backlog / Structured-question vertical capability | Added to its sole planning home with the required model-to-resumed-turn proof and no `brunch_ask` reactivation. | -Material was removed only where the deployment branch's observed application artifact superseded its earlier proposal or where a spine summary now points to a detailed draft. All open consequences and re-entry conditions remain above. The migration was documentation-only: Mission 4 remains live, `MISSION.md` and the archive remain unchanged, and no future mission or remote deployment was promoted. +Material was removed only where the deployment branch's observed application artifact superseded its earlier proposal or where a spine summary now points to a detailed draft. All open consequences and re-entry conditions remain above. Mission 4 subsequently closed into its archive and frozen Mission 5 handoff; no future mission or remote deployment was promoted. ## Planning-split close record diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/README.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/README.md index 507daaf7aaf..1d6ff194342 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/README.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/README.md @@ -3,10 +3,9 @@ Brunch is the stateful elicitation harness and package family at `libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent`. - [`AGENTS.md`](./AGENTS.md) is the agent charter. -- [`MISSION.md`](./MISSION.md) is the current objective and stop conditions. - [`MISSION.next.md`](./MISSION.next.md) is the self-contained canonical capture repository for - upcoming missions (longer horizon than one mission; not execution authority). Closed missions - live under +- No mission is currently live. A branch with active implementation must install `MISSION.md` as + its sole execution authority. [`MISSION.next.md`](./MISSION.next.md) is the self-contained + canonical future spine and is not execution authority. Closed missions live under [`docs/mission-archive/`](./docs/mission-archive/). - [`CONTEXT.md`](./CONTEXT.md) defines the domain language. - [`docs/specs/`](./docs/specs/) and [`docs/adr/`](./docs/adr/) record the harness contract and diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/campaign-adjudication.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/campaign-adjudication.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3f6d8a83cd8 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/campaign-adjudication.md @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ +# Mission 4 architecture scoring v3 — campaign adjudication + +## Verdict + +The single valid Mission 4 architecture workpiece scored `72.5 / 100` omniscient and `3.2 / 4` cold, with conditional downstream readiness and no hard-failure gate. Against the latest two valid flat-prompt controls, its omniscient score lies inside their `66.3–80.0` range while its cold score is `0.1` below their `3.3–3.5` range. + +This is evidence that the new architecture can preserve meaning and epistemic state at least as well as the latest flat prompt on one observed workpiece. It is not evidence of general superiority: only one of three v3 invocations produced a workpiece, and that workpiece missed many load-bearing facts before the eight-turn stop. + +## Quality comparison + +| Dimension | Architecture v3 | Flat prompt A | Flat prompt B | +| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | +| Objective-aligned acquisition | 3 | 3 | 2 | +| Semantic conservation | 4 | 3 | 3 | +| Epistemic and evidence fidelity | 4 | 4 | 3 | +| Gap and loss discipline | 4 | 3 | 3 | +| Cold IR utility, omniscient estimate | 3 | 3 | 2 | +| Conversation quality and burden | 3 | 3 | 3 | +| Weighted total | 72.5 | 80.0 | 66.3 | +| Independent cold utility | 3.2 | 3.5 | 3.3 | +| Readiness | conditional | conditional | conditional | +| Hard-failure gates | none | none | none | + +Do not average the control members or turn the architecture point estimate into a range. The strongest observed architectural change is the `4` in semantic conservation and gap/loss discipline: the workpiece preserved hedges and uncertainty and deposited thirteen construction blockers without fabrication, silent hardening, conflict collapse, unsupported completion, opening overload, or schema-shaped questioning. + +The principal weakness remains acquisition. The omniscient grader found major misses in shared changeover-crew contention, the VW-02 exception, family-specific bottlenecks, customer lateness practice, stage overlap, Line 2's family-dependent speed, and minimum-run constraints. Reader effort also remained weaker than both flat-prompt controls because related facts were repeated or scattered. + +## Campaign membership and failure attribution + +| Replication | Outcome | Quality use | Operational attribution | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | +| 1 | Completed after eight turns; recoverable workpiece | Omniscient and cold scored | Candidate path completed | +| 2 | Simulated expert returned no text with provider `stop_reason: refusal` | Excluded | Expert-simulator/provider boundary | +| 3 | Simulated expert returned no text after several mixed refusal/end-turn responses | Excluded | Expert-simulator/provider boundary | + +The v3 completion rate is `1/3`, versus the flat-prompt control's `2/3`. Report that observation separately from workpiece quality. It does not establish that the candidate interviewer failed, because both invalid members stopped at the independent simulated-expert boundary; it does establish that this paid evaluation setup is not a robust source of gradeable samples. + +The completed member read universal and SDCPN elicitation references but did not read `templates/workpiece.md` before producing its workpiece. That violates the accepted lifecycle instruction and Mission 4 routing oracle even though the v3 runner's declared ordinary-path checks did not classify it as invalid. Preserve it as an owner-visible architecture finding; do not retroactively alter member validity or the frozen instrument. + +## Independent reports + +The omniscient grader completed normally using requested model `claude-sonnet-4-5`, observed model `claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929`, and the frozen prompt, situation pack, ledger, exact transcript, and workpiece. + +The cold reviewer was invoked twice in separate fresh contexts with the same frozen prompt, opening request, and workpiece. Both independently returned `3.2`, `conditional`, and high confidence, but the provider ended both with `stop_reason: refusal`. Attempt 1 stopped after the reconstructed model; attempt 2 supplied the complete score vector and almost all required sections before truncating in the final limitation. Treat `3.2` as a stable human-adjudicated score supported by two agreeing but formally incomplete provider reports, not as a fully completed cold-review oracle. + +## Artifact integrity + +The first commit's pre-commit hook normalized whitespace in the previously untracked replication-1 JSON. The emitted outer file hash was `8b47844cd690e13e468ad2aaef27eef0e86f40c23ca82357703931aaaf189de6`; the canonical committed hash is `2bfcf9e60a15e2014b17afede0258865b784cca205ca6a7709d4dbba20a86c66`. Parsed content and every embedded campaign, workpiece, source-message, instrument, snapshot, call, and transcript field are unchanged. This is a disclosed outer-byte-integrity defect and prevents a claim that the committed JSON is byte-for-byte runner output. + +## Runtime and budget + +Across the two observed campaigns, recorded interviewer cost is `$0.5829`. Simulated-expert usage totals 67,315 input and 5,194 output tokens. Grader usage totals 39,312 input and 9,779 output tokens. Expert, grader, and one-token preflight prices were not emitted by their SDK responses, so the artifact set cannot state exact total spend; observed usage remains comfortably below the owner-approved US$10 ceiling under the configured model's ordinary published rates. + +## Human adjudication + +The owner accepted this architecture as baseline-competitive with explicit limitations and directed Mission 4 to proceed to the visible witness and handoff without another paid scoring campaign. + +- Accept the architecture workpiece as a pass with no hard-failure gate. +- Accept `72.5` as inside, not above, the latest flat-prompt omniscient range. +- Accept `3.2` as slightly below the latest flat-prompt cold range and formally qualified by reviewer truncation. +- Credit stronger observed conservation and gap discipline. +- Do not claim general quality improvement, robustness, or objective-credible readiness. +- Carry the template-disclosure miss and acquisition misses as explicit limitations requiring owner disposition before Mission 4 close. +- If selected for Mission 5, hand off replication 1 with its exact conversation, instrument manifest, reports, and this adjudication. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/mission-5-handoff.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/mission-5-handoff.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..65aaca9bc79 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/mission-5-handoff.md @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ +# Mission 5 input handoff + +Status: **frozen Mission 4 exit join** + +## Selected workpiece and source + +Selected run: +`prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006` + +The selected workpiece is the only valid and independently scored v3 member. It is not represented as the best member of an estimated candidate range. + +| Artifact | SHA-256 | +| --- | --- | +| Canonical committed run record, Flue snapshot, transcript, model calls, instrument manifest, and workpiece binding: `prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.json` | `2bfcf9e60a15e2014b17afede0258865b784cca205ca6a7709d4dbba20a86c66` | +| Selected Markdown workpiece: `prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.ir.md` | `f4bb30244671c5d7a983a937536bb11035201a37d6cc197e60a275e26dae58c5` | +| Omniscient report | `b37f7ed8403a0018b53c4c0c5784c3bf9c2c4fa843bedadf936127670f86ca27` | +| Omniscient request/model metadata | `cc497b1ed3872dc69dca3d5bdf3b8f1fe36fef4bd1b023112481412de32cb43e` | +| Cold review attempt 2 | `8086d4b48ec41ec62c4a25a897db40286b83c500ea054452f020595d445ba1ba` | +| Cold review attempt 2 request/model metadata | `c4e910cbd91d72e16107b21974e82b7b2218626d1ca1c4567c236bc9e5191804` | +| Campaign adjudication | `4020f188c7280009dc48a8b6ece8b8dcaa225d04dedb04bda08116c6d5375c2e` | +| Local/restricted product witness | `88addf723973e02ccdbe7c96e4c16180c46458a7b6983ad1647de9c69e281496` | + +The raw record binds the workpiece to: + +- source commit `794fe2fbf1eaeba3fc816c6e3d1755d7b444125d`; +- campaign fingerprint `e93d1fd6b23a38b12201dee967c1b65e58b7c3d5724f57f1bedeb9413d9b76e1`; +- workpiece content hash `99e4e201cdb4959c114495049e68d7f4d18bdc5c41a5b1d958001b4027fbe355`; +- source Flue message `entry_01M1GZ1BQQ6Y1SBS51E3K1W0NE`; +- source-message hash `42d1d9b7de99f143ed85c57dd3f09dcc166c55bf3e3c409a0607ec360d54dcf5`; +- requested interviewer and simulated-expert model `claude-sonnet-4-5`; +- provider-observed simulated-expert model `claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929`. + +Use the JSON snapshot as the canonical source conversation. The readable `.md` transcript is a projection. + +Artifact caveat: the runner-emitted JSON had SHA-256 `8b47844cd690e13e468ad2aaef27eef0e86f40c23ca82357703931aaaf189de6`. The repository pre-commit formatter normalized JSON whitespace before the artifact's first commit, producing the canonical committed hash above. Parsed content, embedded workpiece/source hashes, campaign fingerprint, calls, snapshot, and transcript are unchanged. Treat this as a disclosed outer-byte-integrity defect; do not claim the committed JSON is byte-for-byte runner output. + +## Comparative disposition + +- Omniscient score: `72.5 / 100`, inside the latest valid flat-prompt range `66.3–80.0`. +- Cold utility: human-adjudicated `3.2 / 4`, slightly below the flat-prompt range `3.3–3.5`; both cold attempts were provider-truncated with `stop_reason: refusal`. +- Downstream readiness: `conditional`. +- Hard-failure gates: none. +- Owner disposition: accepted as baseline-competitive with explicit limitations, without a general-superiority claim or another paid scoring campaign. + +## Remaining gaps carried into Mission 5 + +1. The selected paid run read universal and profile references but did not read the workpiece template before first creation. +2. The post-campaign visible witness initially used relative resource labels and failed. The owner-authorized exact-URI instruction repair succeeded for the template on rerun, but that rerun did not read universal/profile guidance before its initial substantive question. +3. Acquisition remained the main quality weakness: shared changeover-crew contention, the VW-02 exception, family-specific bottlenecks, practiced lateness hierarchy, stage overlap, family-dependent speed, and minimum-run constraints remained missing. +4. Only one candidate workpiece was gradeable; two v3 members failed at the simulated-expert/provider boundary. +5. No honest prebuilt non-empty SDCPN or derivation fixture is included in this handoff. Mission 5 must prepare and label that pair without implying Mission 4 automatically projected it. +6. The source conversation was not compacted. Any successor relying on it must declare uncompacted-history dependence or prove recovery across actual Flue compaction. + +Mission 5 may close a named gap while preparing the honest pair, but it must not launder one into projection rationale or claim that the post-repair production prompt was the scored instrument. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/product-witness-initial.png b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/product-witness-initial.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3ddab50b98da0d74381bd9f7089dc0c99ac14baf GIT binary patch literal 4254 zcmeAS@N?(olHy`uVBq!ia0y~yU#KiDjWttl9P!CsJDrMnSo)#sPJf*j3$WD+%Q@c zj24fhb;D@IINB;0Z4!+(6S23Efi38O(f0CadwI0IJlb9!bnWG?%4I8oO;~r(SOCQZ p_y?d#|NkF7qH+kxU;`P+%<#gUW5K!N4KhFx22WQ%mvv4FO#o+H0uulL literal 0 HcmV?d00001 diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/product-witness-rebuilt.png b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/product-witness-rebuilt.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0502d07f0e4e1342be9e7dac081000533a2cfec1 GIT binary patch literal 159295 zcmce-Wl$Z_wk@0>f#49_-7UC=0Kp-+YjC&V8a%iY+->9T?(VL^-Q8dBoO|wjRp0-Q z>e^8B?q1!!)|_*UF-Hf>eHTN7!-aeI?j53p_&0@j@1TJ{AtqoUfL~vUB;UV#hw@J1 zo1l_Q>T&DGOd~PnGi}FHK8N*m-n7$^gOQICzYzSt!v3HnhR8;FkVB2Xo8h`}$-GD3 zZpA`}Mh(vP{qhwS<^6jS5`P3kauUPzX$h)>wpGtP*QNEh(^-?e@1;eacieZWKgV00 zU&2NkYb{huah*;yYR%`(+nz6n!?USF{%0$3fD@HR7x|w}<$cjRy8rH?E{0J4h4J5A zamqfl9sj#)sOT$(-hX$Y8!2bPRs8Qct7zq*)&BRK>KKI(CI5FgIHmV0|93d(|DT5& z{dccnNy*8$1O#d6>EB~|=wV7~WoQC?8Fy*r3o~kJYd3UrfXgj$`_F}rbaZrVZyQ=z zSjfsEzp@X%H$9e{&#G~DaBy&P!WH@G1D&?GxL8?PnUIihd+YS?P;21OIE-HV%2gUf z5nWxP62p>5#y>hUF%Yv@Jm=@D{3$~|j%%iyijp!cJ1)4*3B!mY3sX2^IzT`#@8Ev7W|uWqsGakDue!r>M@?9jUb}eL0K;rHn!XpB=kJH ze?vjAJg3`sePr@HkowOm9L`9i5qO-8By{=vo*kNQ$QL}&{T*;E9JSvt{!;(^`P2RG z)XKtQx#9;TOhjZPG6I6-QVl3CuU9E}ZB57Y3+0Qc;Z|R`vb4IoXeM&1*W-anhG*S> zE(h8t@8tIOHskfWV04t{LM0B(>)em1<#~rGXw7|;eLm`TxP`BG=2sDaP}J*1KhgMa z+ZlN=uPuLlMOwzs!OM#BDcMcltYWFu6otE*)a zkmdKm!5?cO=|bQ^jsoI7>HD;H=%xzn3rZ=6)E(rc5+ex~rY$=7{`5NRA`EhlJ%weH z_)Y!ssyYv+&h5?lIkT1hgiraLtsgn|AYqU^?wZ$M`n{j~1s-z*d|52x;*rvBSEi@8 zPCN+l@$rd>bgPXK88?)Rn54jwYvytOy?+MP#&%?%hll4JZBNQ&QsC*hy1TnulmMPi zGP++Ow-U=+=;!mXiGU`?%Vdr@rk?l*hRNLCUnNrrPcD+maB^f8E>ZA|4SxgitQ$`1 zmVsHPcg28QME1THM#nK&aotM`+Tlm=@P3*1_8g)qXgO3aX8|pFAC=a>E|tG5B`|2} z?L6K03%s`M@t?()d*uE3Zeelscyn}N08FWYfr0MBkZRQB?aA`n+1pDylh;LPhR5aL z(^>o5o%h?_e5t1MS?k@J{V;>9zzZ8f?_Rn)<49l}L;^A7j zPL3bRcvl9O)iO&-==$qzJ(0(`;PcmeytVT{U`dlcPl^$V@U*tJ zVpoj|ygg&J{Dl?;;cWNA!V`^qzh14Lx3ztt_r`bI&wBJ#0wN{O2uf##fkv(CRLbt| zdc)BhSXv#hVIP0BZDItB=Er^3!@|skhxwq375ZaN%K5=p#$N zA>o3{0I_9|6W zSI4%)^hps_OC~#m2-M`a`*c(%w~#H1EuhNsAzHdD+YzM8D=xZ3-R@SMo401BWd#r! z?ljjQF<*k~aPaW_(BPpHUwicCCnw*_U_3GheB}1vEOYtdfk8V~mg z$R!^=v8RNHD8u15OLf}``wUIn#hEXruwIAJho z2xo8%luWpAbdAq(viqs^EB3?J*K9aJ6sGgj-+37{-{pR2eH^69*hYC?tFywh52A&a zVmfXOBJ$$u%ChWM@i+t(km9TU_#4n9Rj&uzCrR!V77?-8pR)dJ9Mc&UDlb11p?P_EA$q&-_r8qHXxU{i|15cP-uBR$(Zcs*O0j=dA`=Y4O0ds0oL6x+ z^O#H^iXiFWw!F|%PaX^Oi&$s#$y&5f4@OKlk*wZv%n~;UavcPxY$PB3 zkF~c$bme?!EmxG3lx>f*<<=_=7usiTSd4;`ts8-O=UZ6b7g#by$hz()wJ97{LQvJP zI_JJv9n7Jd87`Z_cPl@U!$xdehc%@&-o$a-jxBVbmg?#_o`3P7Aj3TX597J@%(J|? z8E=R+YyoAf-s`A7v&nmxHN&R~9va)g+Qx<{fy!=6+j;c{s0Yx&f6IW!h5f-~tuki@ z(G#8)h^(OyLEWPe1;*zCoA6s9Rk8P!7PZ9}lDrkyXG%Emgucqn+FMv!w(pg`Er=h; z7Dn56KP_kJcx`^l=-B_jfUct7~sQPEa{?m!apODysv;PycZT3x$bc_ zN^JnZJ1%cs8?$3XajCZU10soN}PajWSt9 z)ey-`1Y-L&)qz8;+|lvQA6@IX-p>H=T3Ny8TP+d|3k&Ngr0dSw85!(vbI}JdUl=MPHIU4tt*lB0rIZt`ZWU3p zQ#Cv+f{zTT3Yk3c$)^7ZKEi79Ptrf0z&&Z^mpy~~|KS%3!d3Hjj`6BstfWH1!!H*{ z@eR3CAx>k`l&NBIvGF1pw78hmNM0#1rBxv#Bg0TyI?BL<1Rh8dG7CnZM)G7LxIB9X zPxW(IWDFnAmqu?r2VRM1~-h@&GD00ux+Su6M-kg@E#-WbAzW%UT1w5E}I49!7 zAK*wF;F|I%=?fR<#BM|wkp*hKZ5`~bR5hJ76)mK)@^Bu@1E3quK>Y5f9s_(l3v32+ z*4pj^NmPz}Hey-Tz5i}m!2naqQ<+mG4mS(nMI~y+CVSQmN0l3ugD0AE^=ymz5Ea#| ztj;>l^WAS=Z%gi!-?6pZjhYOEf8?yre73!j4MJ|Wx`NT2t}zP#hZ+Hd5&s*YUkaWq zCCzJjON&0ym&j)>hNd2FTT5dH2L~6Gi(_@{&4lZoy}Ijb?y)EM$@{pctNg7N1(p4j znn>Qe6Nv6evN|;e=VxW7u5T78JWD|81|A#x*D)yl1RZt=I!OjFLO&GakL+za+Awjt zL%J0T5(uK_P$&kb`wJ?$slZKcQv0+ZhSc!=}BK~{L)+>#aHWTqx-Zz zQt~ix;8)Mzwn0IK{f{3W`qDOqD9C~-5k-#EqwU+of}``7x$1laV`C>LMx2af&qq+J z_rt|xmd}Z?{@MMA>5sa08z*mFmM`Wefw7b7)n_Y)9#3n7V|11q$PtN2>DJc4UI=^~ z92}oN`>5UkU~#qT`tEK^OjT7?bNT0o?a9f>!NEbHtP1PZCd;Itz(8YTV;+T(kPjHX z<{JW$<+J-fNOPW`{pP&5{Ol~nbz&q!n!JI7)ru-PCZFA@X)E_M zVPmY!g!4OcB&Q89bMsn1M|EFjbvOC}>QHGmO$q1m*9Yd5g}(8>TEH3*x|{vuFDv6O zr)RH>Vy_)AU(TyDUXEuJWnX{-l*DlLc2D#M8T>p{{yYSRG}8+R$jEm$H?=i2U?iIF z(e`p;^LDcST8dX?wOkh~`{e;h-17i-zRG3h=YIi6++TpO@FpiG>rZArdI34N6M5!M zO7~Gg(LEi2lZ}myqbZ!uU|uU9x6?7ox$ZH{P~Tuvc6@HWanSKOUQO9Z1jGZKLoIn@ z3bo$O{J8cqFm2JiJnvA4D3cs*=Kds0)aquhcqDxpp=$NCg?z&GJn>01oS^m-nQ_T_ z*eN@iEL-?W()HQWP4ysI`sZ;zL&`puDF9Mu$O@b`9Wf%cY(?pSHhw zJ-c+m>*%SVsA@Z6#3`E|8>4p6w(%Q{CbN%!c{-j|)eSeBJ6&zQT7l=k(x!oggv6Q5 z{H)hV0{(i(pCtMk{*7n}vTDRx@7e*{S12 z&3m29gQFI0FZJhG zc)tDBQOgr3$q~G#4Xk5aTfji9o&tRA>>^KvZ;$0~k6;jS*Z$_YAhdo9kdVvx@^5qA zch25-3kHz{P76Q46<*zk^Pq2+uDs=vO5oumntx!Vl#S<+=FW#LfC+k{APDG{28aWY zeKX_rAj5dLnz*0H`+58g*tP^-x5mA0S&=+8gQ>tlB%JQ~bW7kkBOmqFay2G=zxU;? z5zPD0VSE6{^EmaV&A;wm;BD`%Bk_3y*&F+c1AANGGCC5hJt!eZq1Xd7RrlLV`!)cq zR*!VLUQVhe1E(~Yo|#+N3IC1Y z%%%VM_?YN*gJ^7Y)bn|ZNQ{6KMLmb!`;yAr{&J8C4_L{8LFn33J_lk1HM%1532@-5 zwKn6%H2wE{VP)m`Z*J>}$(^>#!@k+I}O z91D|}ghBEo)8zEy{R}I2o+K~Yq;zKE_t5tMR3kTFy3PYqDFAXGYo@>ZdBIaeq3bE^ zWx@$@_C>b8J+-%QhR~fG3@0$i)kJlLbFRTU!Vgu9K>Yav5EH>tbBRV)=%GCeoh#hf zq6X$9g-5yZQ*j@(dw{*aSzB9+A_B-C>kni5^W{-lGZGITdUd4dvBAXt>we_xz=*qe zdH~Y%WTck^pao2z(R3nv{DlMqOj6+%F@;QzO-9)YKtOrr|MDdQ4=b*J`xhnzF_p?E zTX=-y_B;1>PG;tbxw*O7Sx0BMIe5m#Z8VmmPt>r6%m(=H*gwm<3UE6DY$->en(70J;m#E+>xPs--UJBdZ%MrSBN>( zRsEe9iiOzIKbBmJ6{Q2Hru3h*2pZCt$~8PO@?Q5jfr8C$Pv~8%cduW0o0x-irrr#) z(Q_H^*uF1Gl1e@XSl?H~-xGj_vdIvi?S(qC)K>jxuK; zTPN#v8QcD{+-@}mStu9MejnOCz$A-s?GLCz?*-(ja+%-8-yQ_A(%N2c%EcCc^aQeF z_%J_r9X}rd1E{fQ;~UwA}>kU$VK?6+t?S8ae{fCZnoD}lGG>5Nx4gke|! zd$$SyA!eR~9TRx-AP=QS@xi?VbURLXyVJ%!Qbi?PFEDNT>;;xbz$N|TB=x5cBI@yA z!O}4g>8zr5HLafrPx%oySC3?la20>qvm4MGCI*bnu$4om7+YM} zxOd*NEtj1N{b*%p_*56g&gJ0jEWFAtg2!am!km{5NKq5(nYn`1o&Xt_P^W;#PWbWs zlu+LSEtxOTO3}ISo2U~qHdD2`u)%CPfBms^-IwyC5nkUoxC;5JNV~_FeYz}vJuFu+ zr%H1`JGsfT{a}6ta1y;;3V5nt5C|V5`ES*zeePqGdC|^*G{%&a6Unvto3r&m=JN$P z_l}*9*V75Qn);99)|~`R6qiX6tfZL|xFfpl=d|^Qw1gR=*#ImZ*drbX7wo)h3fH%% z^+=Upw5L2d_KSd?y8W$GzjhPR#syMH4?%3`-e)J!`>Ebrn4-R}Zc}y!Zzlp4c!)+K z-Rmz?cO7dxa>zH!Z_J_M#VV}5TlangWISG8 zUMVsD?rqpS_$92Fd4R*aueW*TyXYrKAos9<5U*ea?%(HqT@MvP?m@1?XFz-wvAV{q@Azh^;7+qH)VHVI>=Ygzei77soEOZ2Eu3cH+%N$t(-g2Ea}LhD4=IK` zQ8*!m>c63Pf*+tBhufc}?#97DFty1)=RAx5L*>6FW`d*yf~OAKF; zc`(w(UGFx^V0>-T!#Qgd2|s?}CBI_%8c~yV*^n~jL@PAO%Bu3@B%qexxEobs_~TXp zgN4a5M{RwL;T{Au_MFhdhrucMTJx*jQCNYi5!S4C>p%?#e)=wwdWe2Ys@7jmg7Ac* z2a#wta<#~)L_|GFYwgn}nyM-xr0tDUCu?0?*MJl-rOjN>Z7R*v7(9dVk}nzYLs6PC zpuy_xNcWA0n_84{B3$<(L{-amC%)!;*1sEDDu3d)WpL1Af1n+j$_Chsl8?QvF}vr3 zAhg>BPXF_Az0K;)!j=^t^3eiU?Zti?f8-jg%Qa|@kIBqyZtNyyvXOFGiFuk~^ruy6 zb=s=alX3OMeo|fcr{=6_hqNj^M!5w*e$Fh47Qu333J~6U`Q!cYM~u)lx4oUn8_@Zf za&6Vb+}+*1cT~LsZaLy`f;r54=cGo4df+QAox%9uIl z=w4rLbl+~kiXi1lo?P$)E$9x`pA~@^#AH zZg3{1>U&3aw2JJALR@do`a8NIxb0_FXD8!u|*wyTUaMUTkM@M%7_hAL+ zll+o}?71H!#psh9B5?344-94;D6bY4u=9jDRo<-v8nIV&{gc-tkY>TW17P{$qJS>l z*FNE*eo%D)Mv{>8)^f~tTslCq8IvDC# zSXfxPQ1w3L2hRg!$44K)FwtGdLcYrKv;c0=`1w5qAqWW{K^15(bEsi~O3|bVnB@c6O_0L`YOGF|{-01D+Pa1bt#-|ba<-G{*PHW9&JMsBGVa@NndA1wFCiSUP3JVhtu^C7lH!UnCn3gxI zK+Eq5l__ZYVH}FSkLdM02*Bv`P7V%Q-Y++DWgM0Z=Rp86xh5!q3fXsGyGjRxNT5=; z14u8^v-N59EZ;9j#;pm%!GL;v0wb$h&=t7PD}md}$WqPvF(oJ^Nl6rQhLTZa{_Ba) z{rFeGvL2*`U4jh$#_$XTZY)Cz@U9gN=U~jHCi(TEyzS9EaWtAMY^sny5ob;L313S=-rJy<6aPz3wL9Tys>k0R8BZ)i z$G-~%M?7=*>>Tb|S4%&sn20_8s|9da@t!7r`p#0DTVIbQiO!9$5!Kl#sHT{e`9Z)# zh~N}JcTvJfpg9wH@$)2;bf41r@z60nJ-v6hAopA4*&QDc{%io09}#3^c=+hpn48#d zhM4GR)HwJeCZhb4&#bJF&|FU6a73_iaW`38!BQJHAcZbf8o<0gfaP5^D#u6$2VI=S za^#l}YVw$}Khs&iV~7mq(*uo&T<@&4M03a;s1Mzc<9uKEx!0za>damq$I=n2oyuyN zbrR`Dq?b>`PWZOAx16nC8)edDj+SD^=7cn*KIJAQV-xMKi|JO*p_^7eklp3>lt!NmMe>#oBHO_s_k+4aTg_Pcf5sS3&7SJKla@c#h`Y($CEO+y* z9n5k+=oA9|?zU})a_$rVCu@MGZ@G&F!k9F3SRWl)YPaW`8OUB?F8DQTp06k0?%pN{ zNp-R<=9ZUxdssF!=3NzTMgFH(0~9+nd7ySa}gD=JQq}U1J=MpHnXN7ML<-Ki2pTS%tY2&G+$*H%}y%@Ry&86 zM6+M|f>EzjFyrIDBLInXb%J5yKj{GY{C_JScOiP(HI7K8VG|K$q@=J)D*GVuadRh88B=Ix zR_aHS4+3IOqefQ-kk|pGuC%oDVH$^kfB_wjfPg?$Ugf>pM8LlsC&(;O!TutrU`D=h zyF4|ekZ_yZ^Ghe#8@P*04+O1X2#;l}`X8&CuH)`&fGkD>wRDTfxdPY`sPH|nCynx| z0l^UHzODZE5oDJ@sJ%ZuJXC;ox%hgPN5t(Mui6Iv2;}WyGb0srir-8A|KpFzOILD% zy9RoVfk8o8kQsJ;IG41H;Px|s(SVEmJ!rfEsB1vm+WTy+H9%k^){nn%)6-SCmQ;aXD3b(1!su0W;2b~8BhR$RrqhCi5_R zG&qmqTZcJnLPCp_1RUdJEB^2M-(j}Tnc<5KAw&)+0)&iB^7&gQoB7QvrfUr1a5#;+ zbaHcXOc+7>r2eb#h@-r!NA6?slYe4f`vu$;1)zzYHcZmN+ZWg>HZ_NBHe}nU$(_136s+J+xuj9Ucn^U5)Ce_k;9&W5=zW1r?j?^=+64_Tc$5ga*D>K22p&Keyuoip{ zZQ){n6qFcTY22VDs}G9mC>u$|y7}=vi6RRw%b{TgHrFd2J!^)VMZ`8G-VNzxcTL<^ z-gkwl#kV2vFMT1aT!2gOojmBJ9ic6c6 z+LF6LW5dvYfPil`P%ZqsvTuzj=jqm%a=lD}w&0F^pi@Q{<1-}E8p?~%pM~oLf9i<9 zw1S?JPN=L(J0MXF&y;GNmAsc*NVJ&%^!hlzNQul+Jn;=hz{PDm`@3aW$Y1zL2$I7} zqpmc!=$!Z_4y;-@OTtw%xk)$lanYQ1pE9V~_cE}#xquqC0)y~hq$^SV9MR}tmH*8D zC?wvevai`7q`xDw$MRyr>uCg7VNqm0^N9!C;v*ZiOW`hWQ zOs^|0K1wu*@EOEH=74d_L4HY>`JDGj=2fQ2PAVE;2c7!TXS+bCzdVe4e}Mq_+$0#m zjPqTE$;ZvUA04Sc^S^7lyX?z=?Lkk77yU3f(3!~jr_1JXzauSkA{Fuzv77%Y{r*e% ziXR+uRfjg)fphl-)m(K8H(dZA$wwEmt&(3*r_QywAobJ}J9EGIK1U@SZ?7psMTCb> zqW36rM+KxN3BDr_&{E@N@BPU6RY4)TPmS%%m(wv`S5mGdG^MBte-j~HKViML-ZVK< zTRpuFMOtw^bJX&`zdwM8nMdoj7EwMikSeSD6LHz<>Fal4B*uuqnW7JkDGSLR0@e`n z+-*fc7au<+d2iNF`V_%S%i+HJwtFVG3yHSV&_h(jIEY>9w?`zJmm;RK=dj;qq z#ce{qI&^5{vc^OQC?{2F>>Bj&5gjh}Y%PYo6(g7r`{&eNwlmpP?iS|nS||M@^hT*+ z*~>-=!6_r@sJzCG7`bzh%x*Ez zu_H59F_ICNe6x=jem*w#UD13gkKLUwrqc{_WCne4m_XJOFbi^?<$~T}*6qtS1z->& zAa&Bf#=w>RA)^teD5#?(V9QmH+|DHtU!p^?o=S>xhPM|>6OV<>XQ6hVU=-XX1`&~7 z1|s4~519T+t`|umFXk~65nSAipMKGC$6R8nNLO+;iBf%#kY99dl6KvYHAj`DeGbi)i!I|1snLQG(i`HZskP1; zu3TK?5tWh*p})26jD~Q_;XKL5qwzxH@%i8w6Sp))gSAa~gnS*PVPXL}7@5l#8z+N! z|C=cg&-C=#?a`{8V+!w@5oeIi~gfe$mgH{na^|xXqj-Wu$KiBK5Qko%lB#**bp$;f8`cEYk+8OGjk@55lF3mpw_NvwAm{ zlHeC@pq`>nbPKVFNkv4v32F2tajkkIwCZS@=*h47xw5Njxq!wV)Q-3bAQgkd(g zrAKqeNa1>cGHX_1@pp}iKB=GUhbk&65#I{~gG^rZf&0o=l(@MBYpC-sD?`PmkBDah z_Z;@Bf!`uMRpK5M0%Xk(q*ejPXu@j`#5TaD9su0bp%*Fv$(ROc$POPj0QVG(g8|lm@Ym{~#E2TyEK<5e$S*7T|KznA)Z@(NwB+?^hw5!O!4uKqT|tSQVe=GBY`UXMKN9_ z#5hZqMz@6s0pyg4G(kf}c~!np@g4TDRnd9fe4Hx9TfJ^BrMz`op%SD8kR|ptLg;xv zK;PbbEe`AK2Bb!Jd0R{PykI7m^73qrSC4;5xvldth~N%n5ETqH_yM}K zx#=Zrz#x1aM^Q9%)Q*mI)5uT>o&_#O@RsoV^tn45X6*M`%W987rJ|hOT>Yd`1-bEb z#d;YYu(?Emb0)utx;Wr*d=``2FH8H6$2VKjFFQrn!RGwy_EMEAAblEp6?f0$1dQ!A z{okHOWM5(9!aT5b#un1`gz#91aHh4D zh4P?s_PBB}eh4#iH>Rvh`eL6z9i`mEP9-8dHAj*9#(P*@$_yjzYURILK=@At zh4Y7<8AC=Ei#u0jN+aQd_bK8qbs|*4m0>Mfn0#JLYAA*$t z9)KFAw)n!!$Gfgp+tU?$&u!JYY_)qND<7991Xv=>v|?sL^(K&+xzTbU`M6oQ=_v}* zbQB!mT_-+|X(n|IB3EFD-BdhjouRp=kUO`P1zoxp0m7VZMmmQjC~A?CSPqHFO08DOGF!_WBac)zcjHC@Q+>_oevp@iAsX z0ix>wUGxkMLY_(|qkseOOP23h2U$lpj*Aex;;`opD;Iu3{}$peO{EZ)Xh^18#>hlg zBaWtlLUPyWKwJI?wf6Tj=EnkdN&tYG}_rLyfH zfrkFEE1(P2s+6IlpmS=SHyLZ%6N20Yf_E+U5f6Iw^YEPrXjzfqK=+R{bZ-8v|Ka7G zqD|cQCFx0%s*g0J3|EBtC}vl+%h$DJ!#F*MCvLU2aZyQ6(;Yin@? zW0DzVKR-+(M zBzLsr&NZwTKhMg?j2>rt_{f>%RA3;OrxLtkMldw|d&L|IT3B!;KuJ~a6OOT!N2Dk- zUk>r2L5`N5|`(K)KHIdXAxh4H72F=I+CPRR3Om`nIc0G?^osMKJ>6}OU=$_ zfG3IT+<@o_n~8tedsJv#$zZNs0TZytTpO%5Il@0GsbU(Mo15$D{qic;ZTITDHwUCY z<@Yj}@J5elp`(5JS9-Bq!yERM7s!>{x$E>1k0TkD11;)h2oK5uhY8gAzLZ^#6)En} z7G>I(Y(ZMm!fFuF)VxnV@`|#X?$~8v|VjUZp?u5*rIw|-rDjA zdu@>ehUTI7GJP`n%X#NaOyF#r5`!u_#ebx?*>CIDf+fOEY_X9=Bk{!|=|T(&dMR64 zq><1!A<5?LuE+HcXQQ!cQlgB?XWT|7)SqVqv2M)SF4<=M^63?8uxKQ6!0++M$5Bw$ zaW^(8wVb$K1piT{<~U=jqHSRa2qmurHE0A+N5WMRhjSM0&xtSfW#wyY7|WBjlL)s)uD)v=K;TtMNh#KET4e-*)ylfO?;$1^l7lznf=y|MsxMb zCZlfi$%zT{m*Uf-(@gBd?!8j2?-IPZsiWL7E);=K{Lb%NO%ZhsupF7UyD%{*A?aAz zC`(_AK!>y#0ZI$)7ag07kNDjp!2d(dsPsP8Y@EZwzbVDeBbwnVb`?56S|~`HfwFTa zB7$n@61uPB+0R5hK{&i+g^bSeD_FSw5U|1;^+#j86^h#eu}RoJ@T-o*A`zs|H^4q$ zP*A{sg_})ctFJHQr6&=j)NK7-+OBDQ3|l*(C%?^h&^u>FR_iP-^$P{?dQZ5ulT!l0 zvRiLzQqo5^m2bop6a~ElY2Upa+j}WwTf`amQx$o9a=9F0>T0NCR1L>5lXJZaxSY>0 z4L2T~Hy~oX^^)MZc@i+itx?rc%u#>uEn4QS>m>|Hg($ZHqWOG3jfsz@FN5#Ez9X!2 z`BbZt6PW{c54k}0>0SxBK#XLFSIYvi^dGIOk`&$|)HgSy0&|30h5Fr9*!!Oj4l}VK z#lun=^KJt)h0DLm$%{Bq*C7=dpk<44s@(gr6qV&}Bx{M(#n1Ag;LwgcW=N|v-tnvG z5bqGOm5%2^WqdbssVO~h!LDpzE9FZM`w<8K zos1n9z-KL@!+hmJ2fE7!{OS?PGe!38VlSdyEWZvjipwpAB07kN5Zyjv`9J!V^o99O zG%HhLTqTtN7!cgsWn=4fCDG|fgo+B>Z9S7%l@v-KO$JGo=dvL)XMxCN*jq}>bi`x1 zRfWGQ zxzGA0HED%x9@-a2Z+^u#wU#h_W6c#gO)pTiM*URfKHbg8%g2N^s2>x7o(h^)qz^)( z&76UhM>#C)q@evo+Td#-v<2BY?i-inK&~FnmYyi*C?7hY85kHC6@C4URJ9h9UfkBI z7hUyw;VN9JM1%#-S93zvFck1&#tNG;wfJHN^OMz7eNtjKfX>pvm8M;&lzD7`?mkjP zQOc3vH%Re-{v5qAliSL+KnfU!7!F~;O^2$9GLgHWCnlQWKRRwSVoopbmIrji=GrVx zb?wd>Qw*qbXKGzI@KeX*p)DxWJN;)NH60Gj4&kw4p?@OASFuQBQ53tNE!rHj!yJ&r z1%x*{uw1nE)H#e>DID60=YJv#CW_yNo(dbq7@>rBU82~qmJlBj&#wd*!jD~W-O>mIy+a^m>%PS?U<%=Bkf}vw z76~6fS#ja;2y8Y#meR4>7&~=W@69RjH98S*QCCpy5?=ICSp}a$(V0WrKp1mRkD3ipamE->CB7+hN zAZRX$`XyW=5yi!x!u;um51rHgtooAt+}KnGd6`;%YRZS}qPM0>o@H7LNvwv`53N9h zqe|cO7HJ;fGFr4Mziy_9Da4@zYcT?w3sk>w;atQ{S&hfz1QgXi5_9?jZ&cW5?@Pof5B?UFeinwow~27xi6&6!u4@xv4!Jz-J^)@QJ1hYo+K zQ~_%Iknm_b@XhdnLpFX_TuTMF78P5?O1qgYT;)G>q6$6K#eUyB69Mmk3H=PvWEw`O za~L#JpXl!QUAQjMI5_*GFzm_(Pl4u;h?67NgZX&}g)ao;yXiiJKp})dTCLYFVieCN z8dy_e;kr>N%U_K*JiF4eLRVO+5$pf#O(|ltfOGrfA?56bw7&^o)!@8i?>Q3E8BNno z34`-}TK(~=$e!_z08-jcT(4|MKS94+=y3;5(xsraHF2={(1DP(>NTUXeCtRQm0d)s z6Uo`PDP(5(xo*NEjr{EQw87p>CvMyJTPXwgmO~y3G%sP$G)cV5nI()(pA+3DP~AiY zrE~upVe|~=(X+%dMN>0!)ZDEJ3cc zWihOxSjj(tR3IxWD>bWcZ*OmC*u!5lmm7;s&d$t?;s70%D=H>77{m-M#3xPK-``JC z!M75+lBb}smTJJ&o1ZSl9i@~BGYc@v3bCAw+PM+^xjy-qOVd$s{%eLa;#{D+RS8RFQU_jfgPc&vH^yoYxq|0 zH!sO)M6nYR_!Kv@n2$r4pG9Ems@$v&)3_EI2GU}(Y3-RL{$yR_g@-2JF-Eg40En{6 zMCp!kJ7NYU2sfaX;dz-r~P&djL-d7H>su-#3E52Pp; zQeJKpFR$2!t>Mt@fR7Ri`HpKWxRIn_^Oop?mZA;9_tR)zH!o(89+nW9zS4y# z)ge`(E8eA$f37cMzS&pd&;hMN1F5%S9O#XUPWZEv6Ol*zQTRyB5qXCARlM4FA3DN( z8@BvZQCvxBG?=-*Oyp&D(<<4ZX$S}jE)d=OLX!+^G=@dOiJ5nHpPOaIG6*r|%fPyY z4)%p(K;=bQ*VEC#>XY966*7Tl@U5Dbnnuj!bPPPx2b{Da`M|3@3qY`;M`b$#F9g}b z>Lh4uYd=%z6k1tXvCUTGmC2!e|4{jj3oBe*|8pghj?kkZkwdCGT2<|4j2-5a)g+b$ zGnQ7b!zdl>i>b_K5+W)Ynzh_;E3QtKm>rcs;fhRU|4dM>3HgutDn>0RPUpwfm`#kR z+#4m_yS~gMq{f>1dYA(B2K1U$c8uu6oTSMAY5_|$o6WuT5djq_i!5ImHjTD5j*SEx zSok}AC6e?*2ks@z5Awpa_&>E@m^L(?x38@4qwV!VG-F~%2*XoXm9^YMm7XO|c^+J+ zG?`Z5K3v$*5oOx>X(B|4RA>~!CrvnyU8^;Q3R+s_nAeb4m;_?X_-B^wKu=K{3d@rA z-wpYG#pMiRK9x^{YR0UOYv~QNyupFa;)&i^A_{tF0C+be*$Pzd5y2<8Bqv2x_4x{A=vhPygx@YCjRWjZ~JI{V^`qnge(5k;}1nQz?o9RqZKjD16Tq&fMd;x1q;$YF%1tKR~%B|3iDap#tYZ@p6Q7y3o;sQ%0e}c6jw$iTTnJ? zlNQ=rQ62535xIikBTl^KpM9+|ArUGW>X^>XhcjF^x4G@GFmLut+TfCz_u$z<&qD=$ zB>)U9qSYsWtVvbp;8zLaz>rEr|IAJq={dDrssRIXNV2^6=krj2r>%T9t@^rVOvodi zU)B2rCq5wR*e~rPOJ;l|uV;OHeAd=<&NABpum9wa;G6f2 zWMYcCQ6N5D;O(;jbtl%YR0vhQ!I1@Qt%xwwfU6o#gF~!izKyB=RGpldnyLh?rjF(tG!(~+ZXbGZ%d-q5E(V2T^ju;dC8NVJj#S}y z(TacIT{_6*WkPlv!9-XE$Ltw1h?gW?!X!&Om*97Pv**krSj9MgsOtS$VF**P^8^#& zIj&{RR2ml2Po4A~kQ!R`)#u$ptL`?LB`GUkL4c$H_y|@O7lSKp3=PR$9F2`X99{r& zakKZ^YhoWP-epe@l!zb0d@U8(GmzO~``ahDx$!ZLk?zLE@d*h_Mt658qenZs5f~lPrKqD*V01SO zkQg~a0qIU@q#Gm!`@Q`=?{mEG-~2I--N)|hyuR@{U$fGl=fobKgL<3fry33f&*=r5Nhou>CEx=s@YU3FA)U zpfZz3ys}hW>6|rzbR`>S?HT_alF>L=LWzws7sh;>S)e-?^UD^|MII7LhrHHut5Q8& zAO%OveJRNxkd3)X6jYV^{#Q%!%%?2OVgw68>!l|oP}Giqf;pO_<;Lk-)ys%t^j-_u zh7Lg4w|-esuvI=zd2G{Kt%odfO@6BD{6ysjW*Gzm7qnVEEqXoOj8J=xB)2h_dzzK= zMnQ(5*S=#& z4Y6~cA`lK5CX#V4r-!#0lT^Xz4%~*e1;+7q9TZYN-{hU`ZE^IEYR%EZS&hn=v74ju zzW*$Xsm?uwQ-m}5*PTSnxxNzm@J}0zz!zfL%g<-h(%c5QyqNUq%d)|h*d9w z1aaKKDIjel6F%FyO4(h`Bx132o+F2WJmeZ937sw1PI`NNT3ajNO^94>SFK$fQFvIQ zYS@vHo5-_hsrwv0)@0uwibEN(f+Ux>hTE;A{*-c;H{CrK*yVmZkR>uerxKh|6dOCf zfq6yVP^=~z_|^Aeq99}URFf7ym7A9iKUKaxQ|PgCV-42uHx^XsdUQMc@1AO^XpMwp zX@=tELR0kdr6jiiXa9(L70O`Gxv0;TugWl`$LEofS@j$-m<&G!{DxngQ9m&?^(9HU zey3_hmOP522P=DyG&KjrdGMsjL$yc2Aleu|R`u9)CPWC2!6LZOCA9<}%Z|XR0Y4tI zB95veH+X|$7J+zJaMQ>a&6v{3pPZa6YR4`--sR`OUL*5$Ww2-$IUHiBQPtp)8cQ*N zZP-8p6$oUgID&StV}2;rGef5xn{%*a@VEHU^JgX*GbX~ z#~ZksQhvJ}6_kWym2fe6bL9ffxb@p=9B`2g39k>RhQx}wfj|P z;Ko-2Toc#NW3MR^!Sv2d-a}xTC+edSpEUqSg@xpGibR|}H^VYt3Xtej;^wy3E}^+0y;6K=J!7$c}0cXDIQq>|HFF(_4)hUmcxwedUl!@R~(!NMYBIf@8P=IvM^l zX=?RsMpJNi2+$7K(eOBwytLs+c5kqbpO2&b;M_g>%l8`g6r9{wm25htM`_zo_*VWi zy9@2oEBkA%96NfFvZUK)OXv}K_K>0cHDMXv#*-G?koH5 zZsQp7EO8?o^vY-|tBF6%zo@R+$H)%EZ|FCY0`{_qFwVt&&N`9hzUu6QNfl2tlshoA zNcz>v=b&(Qdb;*6PZ_iX&v>4Hm`H#2(V@uEez>C=9cbfR@_0&ruC^smC@<1XLhZ({h(YBI|pLEqcb1ji5af`KAuMJdk9vhQSrSRKGC|?v5n{zmt+RiG6s;@=pXUoZR9$ zN}*bq5Xy+Z^&W&RxcjJ%bGJ4*D=^C9vsiBj^jRw9WN{}I#QOB`@U8IYwQkmrha$Vo z`|_RndBPDqQr!lc9ojZ65h~PGA_h)eN0;V|_xdw?F9bt7RP1a}={b%-#*A&$^_x-J zp|=nz`s1|GzKqt0sP}VnFVJCIOP?9vi#ahAd#Oi)$GTW(>Vd{{Tn+ zkIvXS7PVgvO1_3I_kf5mA0F+)2K3y`hJdwsySZ$OcJ^(_XWO@hpSOKl#%SlwX+6@i zFOx%T$BSdcU0Y~eM$D<~Uy|C4ID2Wej>yXvwj2C==1v&^^XXGDUpIDqw=aU_H(m#C zlaWk2l?#uUE?3rfeWe{hOqA)ev$e(Io;{sXCsiMY{h)ZvN+B@4FvKCg1C&`CuR{P& z%J&|39xj<2BhC-eIZI`qTXj}7ne(O6Yzgysq*;k0QxLsp6#dcf`+MZGY9}n>dK!ry zcrzg#{7$>ukE-}&n`U`p(H51xJ-$L+{s94vnry!?p}&KoMM+&9@ed(Q%CY3csz^FP zc;WjsA<*peH%ZusCrgbu$!o-Elqz5K=SKBY_ z$XfJM`T*;Oj1P_`-~3ruA`%77>^pGApVV%e(S;!Ih8_Kj1fP+6Jwe8NE!`SPV3T$F42Ow%W@R2lX!iVE?>5xyO zjJ{MZ;b!yBFnR|V&RmBq8u5?r3u!`1$2>fzhexfwRTc%V0c3}1QklAV`F1U-Df+C<@rp` z@K_&k(2!*;DIJmHChD=T=6Q@xtd-J^j+_DYL-xrP{gfYG&v7Vg2Na<};*(~y(vwL~ zbntjr>5>g%q`<>I67=L_5on?o+~4O6Pmks6^}IvCbKDTv&3x>jj{Pwdc&^U$j1;MiHV)G)q=vOLlz{73pnnw z-Z@W(<@_Y@7=<*&El5K1QFPp{lS(NuTm`kc>)YfZ5y|9ri^zxp@3kzLi-8L_tj2DZ ze@=Im&SA+`t!5?qYjNQ$NAOtKJ3Q#_51Q>{o;yC8hN^z7L8iw%g}L2rcIBL+9*~TZ zt+q`ui2)f{jSd2HwIQeV~g&kZ9%vNYg3@A(ET6zBH# zcD{hJ=o>&@IT$c%bL-Cu@%1%$@~Tub#78hY3A`$=yw(M`w^yFHBSloG{-|ZsCdL{K z!f0FKD@o`I{ffCGF?r&89XRrxg`G0DkM-ZMSjEdNgdeThvkK146#~*7&5pd5emi0CDrwErA4cr_`?JU$ROCCA%zUUXOk7mZhY9ho#qIdN8EkZnVAZ9|eu#S}@_f z(A<)TK#-;WQS?b@!1f1_++*xogPr>j2grwAc$Bh?dO~oC`O7&xc~&daBq{Xy4+%q1 z@3RDNLJ)NN;cv;Q@&DBVc(Y^^hJ1sLGAOI&0j-cgdr>rx&=oJwEh*O1$4FTn3x)_aL_v&a4?gSPiY(5y}8KE-SeDoDyM=brnC0B@r=-Hj% zdHX&Rv(;ejm{QQ9>PbSwd8yM9vRspOOlrWiqIJT^r1eDXeTGY;SIwZ2$s0@hI6uDb zo~8H0VlS3f&8Nu*m+kuVT_l(|z@JbR4OeqQQr|@{EN6xFKUoZwG4$)gMDyZxKYM!C zx@o$9wQ?!N1(}Cq`xB^tg9hNu%nP@@S@$=s6+o6Kk~xYZ7V4ykzU=yQn%zqaJ#m}X zI~>{AV{u(?roe!n=XCO0-a`Az*|up4?C7$2-*i$~P}djrTesAWC`);tKY!#e)NFtG;a%2&NktMV zp>GBUIY}!j923l)*Gu{y5fSBl7Y+D~T^Agf+&Dd?Noo4~o^eL|kNZ|T!eTZ z^}3u*2b4!BsNaizL+m}OxDH#v)&B7cGLXu`-JG9QoJ|q$!0Nc(j&$?n$ZN>X7dGc{ zWl8fAwjrdJJw#ULnwB3Hd9Pv9U85-qPJ>{-<+@Y zwdR1XqO7rYsWpZ@r8UXh1G}chw1~CeKrMi}HHY;O+=E4>Xl~D~x96(Czrzt8|CRrF zUp@!*ObGR=U0U?J>ab>aB?3o|YpEQ)``^`G6pizj^qFIl%A)<)xP=IPdt~rjGKEhU z`UbP&slZBImgT>hyYBbBlF&Lg>3 z{9wqZRA;$#qpDJ2xq&ouyzkqby<@zBhPi=xS#g0i&s~;No6k6J4x{GB;h0B}OD6JH z+>&lT$7z>#R9OXYhcp=fbvskbz)r8t6KgWX|FHQ+Ho7k1E_cY8pNaH0uJjFg8jMBj zzrSHca(_b~rvq>jcZi5>u&%|#x;Yhr2YV6*=daj}OGjom0aYo&9MI#>4g$Ud1Bmdb z<=e5v#`a9H!;V22-CkRB6Yb8oa~t~nXiBEWVpD%mJe~yv;+E|FRpg%pqVliTF#XEv1(}M@<(W^h zchMUgr;t`ChdoD`{qV$a6qDxjwoEJeoq~PL;L2FU>ez@+0LFHgREp#BcWHv_rAJ2~ ze~L0uJUdPbhj(bERzW9bD##fs{beiI(WnD-VP9Lgr=2K2V->MjENY@FG!u&4TC(J$ zEEpO;xAcv1d3T)jgOgE8PE>STW)v>pcY3v|f|~63-FJ!vWI4F`wdv_uWhqmCf~y8z z3nSKHJlCOI%)2>n-F6OVAevyhIP~1E2bqMiYqL!DlMtkqv?x~)31PyFE9L|uhn~Ik zO$>kqm!|W}9NwJu7B~f5LO-eHO*;X|C9On9OKNSt#ubzN#Y+Z|?nbgdQo@o1^?^74bI>%Y|h5HrqtPT5jYQj1GVP!BhgpS|1KwX6UZWOSA_ zn;j@_J?Ch37^ho3K2p4s2S7Kzi@c9ME<2x>ncposYC#q?TV%7R40qP^6){un$~o$X zM@J%M`#%)by`@z-$vPUby?x^?IuD6NdijqR>h=+OQrPsgw9c-sKJq1OC>-Wg#+btP zKqHqpwH6j`K>ZUgdt6ddLK5RkzfguB1XhJuI6JRvfr>Eb9J(M*fAd(ll0a(50t**z zGw$w0BX6H_bB%ec0Jq;wj3yWBQS3|VjxG=sT+Ug~{p0?6n^(z7TloPnJ|9S%7q2E0 zcst&vy<7mQ8D@QkM_kOb1ao?)BqvW^UaJ)$+Nw@<7Jt z2u5>Q$k>G^V1^A=A2AG6zXPy~*W|5sNCD+1eqa+=JDsARBGHvx7t!WW?<}m64t#IK zLo=gHPvzPqNUZ~@>*gN`?jZ5Lpvos%|MGA5E77+f@-`v~M`uJ)rm74YlR@#jQ00}e4Wj%>&-eSgXCQCxozj9*e4WOF zlsPM>kGx-YEp3g9nR@QnGHb|xobnW$843~vtoYRHnCxX5pi`WWxCs-I^$tA@3-^pVuySRORbRp{lpRYK0Nir5%R6p=Br;>3Nm!V1yg%Z%q1vcXwL{` z*8x-;a*Bn&bSS64GzK*jS@=^|sRq0sr(!f6wD{0KwPVTdjGW>iZB>!O_mXs&v1fE8 zo#>BLTVcvHD3T3D)>2G$Mu=J!M+*E;T0~8P_E zCnnsC8FA!wKbQac|7jWoe}_dKki?!k+;toi>4zo)5`zyVI;Ijo%ZW5Ti{2ybS-3~w z#`wN`;%lgR)wqUeGClwBDpsCoXFhyvc9jF|C#t)pdO}~r%-y<75cf^oW$X8>>aPPM z4j(?*Iv#Jb5Y^69>Z^03xY9P-d3|3~!di{n+8R3EA@*%l-QO1mk~Md~?31BcbmZiL zJ&064O|l>BU{-FO_pPn}ptlTxfUE%-Gy(;tg?*n~T+CdxNg;2(7n1ZX$LCXo$6KS+ zfwEPol8&LAtlUQ#gEMwwb1|OfnK}VDgLG6aXMVDfZc}asnwpd@_9)iC!v%W4dTur~ z#1G?Fg1ji zIG19g*)PB521N?RC@5V&8lLc1D|?zQ@5k{nC}PemwYzMd8~pW!D*R!D!L-H4rjiQ;2=B~Cf-=q0!{)POGH_cB7U?Li@lW6O z)vKuIO|xkzrZIe|_WU@aepij|3BI8~QNkTM?#YpM7K)gebclRh|Wi|fQ zLFNCQ?+J1IFr%0H94|k_$yE*J8SX=Qs6 zN+IY)hu*{;ZL*!Qoh8xC!?pc3Xi(n-j~a7FyvTQa+q?(ewi$>3xE!S6g|0)Lo-}d` zJ$lCx+MbiZpy$S7pIewC`bv`9d>Z8@jJjM%i@6>+LFYu@>ru*VM6E2$N!T*FE1*H6 zPJ`Z~CT9-p`WfjkiZZ@`tf_|)>*(3pSzm=z$pR*NdiuwYTgzl09vZwloKO0bo0(~2 z+;nDmd940a>u@Eni!OMX8$;yp(~6p8E4_#6MChIE1ovIN8i5AEo1Xp=v7r{)sBb#9g%qhB#{L>3H^-kc zl4Q#SC&5ZT=^6r3%Tn@tXXrhq{lT-KKg#Qr2XqUTOJ6yHdN8C^ftEs9YM%dU{7>SaPZN5qOWu(m22?nSyNYY4u z^&=PVCwf<^wJfU5z2jx9^8%c<&>&6iV)0eFEc@N~doRs%00t>i?5`E;II8alzO`|g z(}cV1B(W}j*m)_=t!S#(tR7I4nz~Q3MDcTYW25lri4YKGCD^$DAAI5njDr>^Q^Bk* zBk7K53d*|Y9wV0H7(%rhYPHlSIg=64WO{dLnPfX3`eiB|*fT4EN^+#k=uPi45~j9J zO`6BHn4GN_gDQoC<9?NAij(R>xA9a(MC4ld#$7Lt%Alw)-&SUk+=nt*pakOepNPUD z4inCXD>{^li49Y-Q=usMAx_jq!Elu7=OH>wd$Qqw57~hxko@Xowrj*k@2kM)JhqhG$%PGd0oto_fQQ0WeF=co69B5+U8YoUOVUO(D#P0HF42!Epe^ufWRRb8R^ zRI|EW>qJ0+K^N}+(bgZ;cCl7j$@_m)UP|wmG$|T#TNuT*59CJT`8}a zHpN_qU(BpJMfCIH^2-ll%>-5LsC*_QPE1Gz*zeZoxSvrJv=h9q*2yS)r`vkUaLgXz zKPf%v?iom-?B8s{Iv{l7aJPt_TVFqmDDiDdWDYSte=g~~4A^^aMDe1OwXtZC{as@5q;d_HLb^dQ)}RyK8^NsR9?9_ZhZh z8PtXw#F3un^iArDl!2NOl@?6mGVk(T=x=e%sVIHt;s@(%e6_qFJed^l5tvbdmN|mf z@c1aS%E)Q)*%NBpp8Vkl>X@!)>6KV-gS@o;*Vxcv&NGxvRdTW|FAG|Y+Tat&2ztfl zooof4JrB{}1B2MLR7(kDA&c7I&GU9wVvWuY1_38>o*0NS5(VQo0f9z%SC}c1@Ai}? zXDXASpwnAScivivG#@geNz3D*8et&BIn>5(4o|Z^SC*5y5sRBxo820NCH-Yx^uB1f zj>IRew!*Y*{qd(Z9dY;7sfdjuD%ZNKL~vMt8M5L|IyPFG5or6!Tyd|b>j4M36^AGs zR@)7+r7MgPEX;I~^$`fzELpvSM@aI~YSMpR3fZ#cG3L)$u7l=uY*|%tX=wj*sRXzIGi`I<$Z|%YeEakbd56aCo%yhaf(xap%n5X{H zew0z6NFqicfIb=3&@J6K^l^!en9{8PNbUalpQP6ae(9EJGhM>}u$xQ%mF=$#Bo1|1 z)NE@dC~cFizXuQg#U_SsNg3r*8uTw)389W!+%Tx!uV%ja`eSBk(^k^s({UB;)>t^~ zlXr^qGMVj-Y*`XgW}Li_-1StP?f)GB0}+#@$;;19)bmRZI0vq%kjkqB1FL~{@bH_%Naf8_jBYj?yUp%0Ys~srM*FglU)C6n)+MySu z4v?*`e&DmqR+i`^jrN+zyg{qSuJeV#Q=^#JQH|DzmK@yq<{viR3R`8bHX}AU=Gr{0 z1l0R@nInc^A@B_Byo<~`JC!`O_Sl5}+mQoM%3$8FkWTl#q7Dvk@0t~^fu;E@K%a(d z=1A=;u8eK>Ah2*e@q!sOV;w6pZj#UernFy1^E&iSiqh>kI4OBUrrgN_fK}zo?`}s4S#U&;6nJXmH6;nE3o0EXUFw&cb zf64rTm&{V-4)E`*A`GPRUr(K~r5W%ITUO0wC1a&r63LebJt`FeH@nM4n1z2r)ep%_ z{bt8WGvKrmFIL$x5QH+$vwWabd!fX$Y8#6mX`ZlCGoJ%0cG{6$2y15$2vVznDKT@i zb}FsRz2*NN@y#1@R;db1Fp=9-S)d43##HtL_`iBhBezEnsZPGJym;mjc7`1M-JfuS z9>@EZxCqRt4m-PXL;gb*%jn#WU=Q!%-*{=$xI@P^3$W|(8PNm0c&bAnVMkV^_7Ix< z)m4yNj@5vq&UI5)Lu2CWaDUT@*&Kb?dSq}&NZ1j%H>czKOIZEd{dTGmfyOrm1|(S& zbiyVim&6QnFg=o>6lsyNfiz6L<6dDmT8D(tQow{$J?fztvV&O+DD3vyl?32{vIySy zrJ0i;e?$-&v33a}7()P512C9w##2Fz!C$>Rq`EeSKuvtORVo}2TF#ki8A%59I?QA+ zpD62xO4>C#as`Wg^==lyKMPe5p+%HHetr&k5%HzlgNfPCh;P4ue&6e;^U-B2UK0J- zDNQGsy8^qd;K=K11dpaAao~svUONyEl{Gh~If85YAt!*T9uV8j@nq&;N15&5>jDL# zt@=2wwZ@L$=bWC|&VtjK&r6drFW5kD6QugX_gG@iE!{NMb~0gVYTh5z--=~jjd_&r zfq@{i%Zw`p(j_gwD>?!KYop6`4w@B72}cqh`K6Q|%*^ta@H2TMqqXl-=wNYz;|f~C zdrr5UKjs!@q|SA8uA;tIdSKpAOkC--zA_EX!4O!s)EO68fGN%lKbXI@V!bqrv`~d^ zbuigZ@mobT+1f?(XIr7nEZ%>b*D3`vnKNW$E>=fExZsadXgcl>!x-g-O%qQ&G1MXUCEXKJAu1EkDhP5ZNVU z?70AQg;CPWP>n^Xj3g#;b|NwTqpNF-E^*%Lp3WD$711BzhujX_W` zf8#%;w!h`Rg=gOp`H)i&M@P*u0)QT8v43ylc^!;?`iKYWK?1iSNK6MZH&Kr^6@C{# zgKIFAhrStmMDOO6j~c+7vm?4EHd`(}1&1nAurI>t^Gv zlet}QY_3Sit48zmbtp$2YgilgAaIWLN0`4BH;#uPKp}A}o6@8L(fotH>HIH*710Lx{2m?RWWH7iEmfT;TRjp%)oC8O zlf|$;VL|?7lg#zLwYZzY&VI=n@G3Sm84Qc0}H;ANa;;)%b zxLP{-Wyd<DO#f@nnv5eu0~TGt?%ZO} zZ3C3c??eU+27GKrF-cb@hjVOgk=kaGXNpv3zw#NGE-jKS+yWRpVv#(8+!I{f!G&I< zG-BIR?3dl#erv#zDQN=mWG=;*yc&J2D#BJe=>W3Dt3f5$ruEKlWTV{9=NVq+`Fk+C z5CVQ+q5wk6EpyGp&L3-=QbGN#DxSQx1{7PA;d#yVf*O*!ZdF!!%yi#P(m#}Q9hXzo zy`exLhURgqRP{A#;3!)-=Vk}lrY+Ci-HWEoS!4gW)3QnT9S#*?Zf=YQyW@FHW^#d5 z9o?bz5$C$hvng{F_uAJDxUvfFI+?Gd$`j)-I=VWgpv}34E|*Q00P&aYj8)E4PGe9g zs*)JT5ZA>Bcv$APpavDzPI`3}Tq9OESXRRN=-^-@H3-$ODgg>4U?-po-x@`1=w6bs z5iYP*XaPUJ&KJ@`Fld;B5Be18mfyWIx28Jwbsah6D&KSQ7KiIA)sdn|K$R+8M`x+l z#q>9U=}!XH$vck{pRJ$gNb$BrysSN>0N`2w1)Ko?1;KVD+g>`Sarj5GWdv9tlFAAk z{UHF=`0P|-Fd!b9$Y|8E{6)#^ViOKGwO^&|NPQJ&8fh)j&K}!b?k9K4(aT|-#$w!s zG*H!3X(*$Q*|oG{%${jZp-US*{>#CZW;#^n;*WnepII@hT26HH@#IK(<_!p%9=z=V zo7mfN6M0BTewYijC-Ci;$NZ1P_G=%WVL1@@?$R1*Cnf~^lUSA+u+&J7$>YzePYih^ z^Uy=m6?M#cAVK&S^huL7Qt6#YnITcO0zj9bjq(Ot9@8@Guu@wO| zBP~dkimGQ_VX?@=gkQ^brjeS}vBiD=d@Up9n;_j|Hw9<=n#SGrxk%9dR`oC1XJtC5 z__9;!Wlu_Ye~CvD5Wz`(s2FwQ#aVb(TLY!?mNC$S*H$gGp^dlqZjy>7sA1 zvt6!*4Y7b3sOO)Q1)Lk=;Ezl*xIa`W1572$e;D*zUc5w4^N3wa4h@2UKU0>N7Xo0W zBHmlxH`x-!{A9AaAu8yhl)aC6)snK@=CPemNSeQ`FXG}DZo$^1`1(@Y6QuzRwcffb-fe(7tL-YHCKD!7%&LNsc!3GQAnAob6T$P6!>H%$mh%HH`TtUX1rGmi9D; zU^fNVQAa)YRZ@L7#YAn+YR%yr4{pP$7=nHXY^VK`>?AF;zcW51XWV8fOjaFP>}h4H z;04}?d)}#fO#29$iGpj$w&=1OUd?BkQ=Rs6p*ipKSm)(3I zhgPnZYkRj`d^aIeNto_mZf5uS!QTG2#GB z_yc{J50T6$ypquOb3lGuN zTIltIHAU$G3LDh<)Jy8ksbmCF4))2+%*+ktsu#XZMSr;+s|i`?i!OK%2+(BeI=)?4 z#lc>huCBbgBTzCnmDWIUVidq-lh=;#%Y@=lVb7Mcd4J{_k6Ej(r0V>cD5RmdKSI^5F3)0NhDOytI9N8K^!)Y>2j4CbQ* zA!3kX?!fj|yHP9!hWyEXF|20_#?$bnBoH@`RkOlqKR=`^*}RXS!m$T8iGY0$Sd?8_j5)c6y1UV0=l^g zp$_oUFn#R|rDdh|9VL5V4*u$J4f!*&>%iqHwLOEbOR^tIFP;;;1xm6p)X-_Nl+@T? z5u1%Ib048a~Pt5%AwGXwj-^=YUWN(-7X8O%Z_MSe_pJ5 zR6uxIGh4}Hyc~x9_rv7x^MtR!7&s+fWNlTweYC$?W?(>-#e7PkK5{{I?B}^1pM^e| zd#tA*(zy>Uz$w_E?v>c-lVz2YEm?e!zke}_?5N?5g^s)Di8tq(rsjmG<{3z$&>m2c z-%TNJJC_lfCJ=q#YnYMxC&0|Kv1Rd8<1KAzSu6=*8i%+uC1=sQuSuM?zJ?e%X)8mK zV5kK~oM4=wtd}9@_mo8^I(QWNyy(i0>ZxR`yMJ16swo3)Z{J>Wld1einp7P(SKH9G z{wvov9CODAvw|E&K1M;5iHyiC8ydNq8a8fmf@`&vewlh+n%mssW~jk4_DG&1DE}ZH z7O1_gQVtSC%D!T17HQY0AsyvW$GkIy2Y#~Isu433&e&D?)*cqsAz=^fL1FVHXac0C zuyL_r0cjcdv!k)gQ|}-3HB3$Kfp_}-%Kw58MMnbz_}D}Be;23Lr{nK5nxmJdY&rVM z*guLtdADe|AW&s)4B2+~)3;Lm&GRX+V{6zsqqhCDRirxbAtjq(|LUmiix)Je*Vi?} zw6uR+{u`GlP5HZlPT@;LPNlR^pofbPsd<8@cA6Y^j+V0))fbr-bxZ&)+-vSRSM{V5 z$_{8Met!n+?cgGerNq(a+|ny>+vcC0o9p9TTAV2f9wJR0<|Lk+E)vD*!f-KBW{!7t zU2u5w%-dErzOSo6=dfpwbbP5xzoGQSoYIfxg{G$A7VH8`IEiRbmvtLEVz2)j;(P`S zfX@&EU{q0Sf$bS0HS8jtdVL*nf80Dg&JGT6+nehze8lY}<~N?zmcKM7EVV6wvOQRG zhFly%tU&xW*Ed%xMCifXns-G>Gn@O@9#5PA1~nAT$pzmwB3pU*av(u%<*87;nxmF_}v{+wTs$PB|nYp}%ESP{3rXxDZ zce!za1L%ylzNPKen-D*}dJ{W#aBF+{b-i!UaO!M?i1$0jkhArzmejGhINkZJVWkB1 z3Yn12ITN^_r?h>t+x7WFw zfq5Xl`v{8*s6SkSfi_Ei9_pSwLre0+&fxw#Zwbfe<|w+R*94zwAFWLJw5wm)EGi+G zq)6RgyhzHu4u)!LY5l{$l>QOw>PS-2J64b(so4meD;+)t7G$2E*OQV{jI3P=Xx=7P zEY5u@&5=!^1B7{foET!y*cI`dr@X!!0woe&5h#sTKS!<90z#>TI zeUxLqv_$|15PAIYElLu_^0BT`_3)Txb0-?sf=g$7R4@l4QQ$}`Wil#Dc|*d+{`)ss zTYq}~YfUd^O7uC$#ho^h8|k1AjnYI2MrD<6>L9;Y>HV7*xEzj)T#VALHyUaQ>H-Q~ zFlG@y{#F%rb+O{(FKG_d(UHDM$r&JpfK4qE^le1_?4H}Qy_x008pgQBHKDSmjmfe&{iQRHF8owqueq+n*hW6|9298cxq z&KI! zR*7CnNXJ;7nX-fcl=7wGuv&1v7jmwnjXF^#*)ooRYz)D`IO+n~Qh!h4{p|zL3MH>w zf5?X$1WpIVG~;fC)Y-8>U%{1lK12WvQ-ZF$2S=2^&Yyq4e>#fb3}kZ8>{D$Q>*A+t zP`SfyA#L>sxV;NCSzl;bINjamQycLo(<(y<%p0TvF0-o4O(^!KO)BiE|-V!TU2{ZWJ1JUmHc69?B|Gt_Djh)2tE1WJtZ@b=&6Z zAnh>slEo)$B4*~6_!H9K$KP{E!O1Sz|ER@@uTCWssEI7GP$Zh>IX>$16f5R8o6vS% zB1m2v^^My<$yiRj^yBAYdsGDwIVID9-_{0Ng=-cd?H%7u?S*jXu{G_2owOb%jl_}gUIcUF z`w9nrDV{GrD3xaA2dTzg>i0Lfh#M zxEzU2XCZH*)?on+sxBAzf}WefY`cW-&WoRB>S-2j2p1@kESf*vDn)ERJnB<^l-b6f z31a$Im=AqtE_4fU?Q^CA(I@z1uB3FsfB`pnOi7GjD4e1NHUlL@0cOEWVf`Nm#jig% zR4sIG?c@x{HDj+;gQ&+f$Tu0%dbQOv1`6a7zIn$uJ4t+q(&Kr+SD)MOy`+7}S<*x{ z*+>#_q&r}Riq*piEhMY5At$;ItaN!iNV!GVSpMNhoZL6i7 z_!*c!qo;Pno@Cap1ZR@Ma4I%`O@4e9LAZL_#Ytw8LBlOT5B|?)LG#6QMK%h8SdqX z0?OOrG;PX)=(1OBbo<`l;;P0}5I@=0o+c~~aN9jZsc4VXDUFNR_fWoF zbm;wsEm=4qAWjj~o{pyBS?sSrQSGn7wV0IbO__V4s#|HaJUBnHW9+?j|HdM?QcWH~xjD2Za66QrpJ3cr3RP*M9Ghp}B>)fRI!2-T2 zy#as+KLXH?bkx91D%O96+%Y77-He0OV5mrx@D_Mx8mkT7K`+|tNOkgc+UbbweWu0I zq_qWcx6Va~{Ei@l{S=3Pb{ArV{`sRP@Y!o7=PwL|NeWo9f!H#J_B`S6yuj*vz1blm z0}~=J4nUXn%}8FT^6mH^=KgL2RZEt*PB-}Ud`hq#C++MTTp0f3Z3o(C{o%GVRq`ug z0w-QmM5ZN1u40Kl?RBMaoC##e`Wpx|lr@L2^KPzBUK5b;uJ1hYh917%>>+wg?}8Aq zkE8R|vYFNYjn=IKb~!+&24T5K zZ8g$#OBFoG*5chR+{|TaKa+xe`&-r`pjuGzERoW@840OE^grIS9@>Wf+OjeO5}FI2aTZHvp{vXY@Gvgo8|T|FkSzd~ZyNJ8hG zicCJI)rWB3fq{WG%{Cr#KkzrF{wg|+%^$F>)nQrTfIyv?KT1ND!euC*A6w4UY=5L%q5K!0PhVAMH8Nu7kxvQRYcEv0`pEg z11HJZ_lPZvlr85|CX)Eh=3xX|Z>vPyW{ifOed~!jrmTz|kg%G@v;f%ZGDGMLo$B2GnFSsYejZ*z@W>)>*Ow!$GCoMnI%`?yC(sE4TFXvUE^> zh{6ZK>O1q(8tS>C*uqJ|aIW*ca%jqOj!zLFt;;lZ&+C#vRA7{9J*tlfOx?-G}j zOo+kW#?%FHR~97Y&NWC28ZiY<4?dX0m4A}Yq<)MA(+R)5y=~k&vZ8}FfM;!|M9Ho3 z&o;(sAGG|h7VyRZYM;d+B?e(joqolj9@t0B(eDTEQ>5|0t2zc2n{(aq>3vDpnUhPF z>gY2)_WI=Pduf!4OXsp(PsptlTKp~k_-xyP+hE4JvtiPl_N0!HLulL} z&%vKJXa~n-52^RfL7^#uy9=5HO$UV?d;ofZD&+fa22dZMf}~&`kInY2zII0V9hPNy z?*JS=&n2`92U%{t8U12{1N9GOQS;^8DP_zmUrG|Wv3Zjb`_}fniGVOL>lzXqAJvX* z#!~Y|&z3jT!U)y0ciEHJct2>59 z5H!6Q_iTMS?%=XOgO#zzxN*EzJ)&Y@Csb(nG{_@aX^918bmK7kxW;^YG1lFl_a~yx zIP^7$(s|*luczlf`q|wKp!G$jVSQNpxxgouXxRFddxYn|y{B-6$i!667d@K0WI1P! zjtv|1Yvz1hw~W@1CElURnql_-(xXcX&h1431P1$4n7|hZ6 zQM6g-5cL?#C-1hGhCi}l$M_eImfh~}`Qht&j;WXW?;O$_y(D#4Bv3VaxpDM|RxGkk z{ZzQc)eOZ=XtL5o)vIMl|d$$WwnzdXD6|^OeU} z+hZBC?w~=uU8Bab8oL4Ex|()cwK~PG0DImk3V`;43M&+NHMYrC^NzEZEy8kc&DU)& zX%FJ1@_ASjb0VTT4H|x9_-t)ghKe{i9!vP@4BHN^^H|i{1PQ?12!(c)BCTa?Bm!x^ zdb5IcweBX_a3-5=5kQVl)R5$(>WiZIVm{uxetV^g2ifc@A8roR+^+QiRPetmtQgDL znRO?`l9MW*Xpg7*C9@h!CnR(0iSDFy1$TSL`L`B!6-jlDQZ71gG@EGU z!@<(a@Br`v5a+VcPC+t#mE*r8*phA$PZXCrSem(E89me!;Ap~=fWCtCWBXew(N<*E zW>BX`xtQdKX(z+urfBVS8cVva}3|5U00uo_{Jo8tJa z%J(TnQa=~@Sw4M@Gk>eHpwT!B(6hi=AN@o9?l9#Q?PV{4wW_i*GIvXl{M~L<>v$bJ z6>yD6bC$wF1JsRgm-Ce5dMZuBu+Fn~dT_vthPFhpozugFj(@u)n#wGUSc9^>A3u(K z2_JQ2^ADEmC=w}Sy(djvLc}*{7!dW5UI&AtR%Fu_^V(LM5icM}Aj6hFMR+dBzytS| z>r7?ca;T}fS$wg1@qz{irgAa7FT(AD+Ngvp!Yee-7I1nT2RmGHsdfak1$GfuyOlaS zc9gE9k6ZzF#3S##vX_6$WxI)DNMN3=QuRdAdp3-7Ib zf2IdmtsF4_LyNkg^viS?I5;>C4(0pw!7eTi!NIrsx@XJH1b&*oN5s<~3gb|7J2d{y z$;&h4(xLDs*T4@l3J>~TQC=~H9N-*KyZDq{YD4b2xA#|5PsQi(^+7|WuJ6QB%&?ci z*xcL>&;svrT_9KIc>hvVLL%|+Obb_ANBOga1532%y((eU{bJIvi2|@FJ6tm(U5~*x zkf$aGBvAA>>9NgiiZ(Uhx36CwU%P91v_hwE>{VeiL+_pn%Rsy4%0K81KYMSino0-4 zbEyD=95>3bsj(iy;8T$46+UBy60x|qV{=rQ3W}IPs+)gHRRJb86=XVPM>)o5ik%mN zB(|Sf?9v3tst`3amsARVIwL;}mvJnzmeNhRR0&`Zf-Ko-5@m{#vy>_!gD^KIwRb0F z79{_NrgLDgtLwUO8#igtxUr4KP8wS$b{ad4ZQHhO8;xzNvF!%m&huSwuKa;>&faUy zIp&z-t`f!+BZcOC5x)r2N$kV*`|i>KBT9$bVdw< z^%3-$-d*@7<{NM4jg=OzGXlsZtxF>&0%NlP@#Vm;?b-yS!V6zza|-xS4rUdaykUwc z3*ncueFJM%Z)_Uegmqnzf2D+^WG=ao9SBp-#?NJF+xZ&UrPI5j@I?w%Jp=^ME`{uM3PSo~8^81d)3?F_3v3i9-}MW_1$>OPvwHNt-~nyUJOQ6_dHM52Wv-*QXgjtAPi zepceU$TGj~=g2OEpzW(&#FCT4t8sfLZ@Z#|K+G0235d?j)a}qtUhSMl9%wK7u^18S z_!9JN9UGjM$fmDDZ;-;^tTLc#w$y#I+|Sw@gP`gFetIKG4^@5 zANIzVMOo%OgAXUcq#bJQSdV0Zu9>uXrk$xQ=Fu9x8#{}Y z-42}yrj)oFc?r$HHmY=TC1j9pDw2W2qd@cVdrNX0@T{Klh zp}&iTT_Km;$A7UMPw!nh=;K|&$%INDLkpktMBzg#zPjldwg56f-20iBn3y+kk2E$* z_1SgE9Z@Oya&F?4Ae<+}=L(Kw%EDfj%#zs#qY8EG(?!qa#ym z^Rzo&gNm?w)~esB`N!%HU@7R*883Mqc^z$SWnEQKPSsW3DK_Bu2lL?zptEA-^;Wkk zKvNn0Xy1V)gkLV-$I2M_1hMRH+|myKW}&)JYg z+!A5lcgEVvOoS9zT7aB1HUD|6z_AP#k7hXxsmyIb`2p2j&i#M{*5+rT57nBe_MnSj z&Q@WKgIRL$#+^`pqD;3F)=@C6Kd@qGFm`lwbTuMNVQZaeU`9hWR|l0bYv`Ggh!-D8 z=S&HWem+X_X-~Dl&bcwRC&cEsEj|WQOq9I5(aPJO5)l9j>iE6L5BM9uc&M?&@GL)! zBL_;`dKi6NY>;EK*UC0!IjD4h-w2y;hxtp(cs^eTicJfFA#Mk8j?|OEdO91Ct%e4+ zeT%?QU8PNG_ipmB{21&6Qmjw$M&XP?For+z>d>?VYb^_>END$ix=}aIj}rBd)Lqx- z$Ry4VgQ7w>Xs9A%*s~k6qC9^LQhsmR*C-rRm-hrwkpG*IPFmVKR*FnBBAJD>hZG;4(}TPUG)!7@6S_yjgSJQ+j5Ul;t zp2;Xa3@1@y9LHyOHIc`RO!$EuNy;b!6$%P!2)fqkOYQ)-B@yKaH6;&}BM=Yat7cl`PHzGKk#nH)~;qIVaRSk$i^a+T>JT0}>aVXYK?%DCfJ{7mk`k<_)_Rw7|BH4CE z9C4R%8RTvL%RsEe(Da8^IxkAm$vQSk-h^#eP5mL_vRgbU!RRzDe9fSt5b#apTNKHb zSp@>~WD(jFw{q9v*(!M4c>ug}?2q51dp_gvqapaKC`noTw$NOud=MgAAZIDv6DJ~9Y zRc{iSTQJ+z2ph8|gF87jAn5ZOJ8Iua^TEh~n92#!mgfBGw@PGKxc;q4eAW?hs1ct< z8NL%7^_dGMqs_L*wFslj;2~TaobvFM8hS+|73iSe&u3c-({rBqqvh*?NeDz0M)x>; z8sODkH!28PJ;Rv=+#YHi)52PX)!FGanH$rRH3T(dmeCL|o);^gQE zoU@+g2A~?>sh=1YF{Kt}b8@pVoNORY$ymBD|3 zeHb8qX_J|s)_SHE_6^ET*W;nlWlK|<(RIvJai}PHqg8 z>=Exu*F?_Wg@&71Uzff+rA__4%u`Z~)uACa*+bh-XZItokIaEPdO5Xs=+N12)UAUS{e(0rAmufQsw+m@B{ zy&#IZ3VR9>D#iHy9IH=jh?=qBpjRXsnpElbth(VO60lTxu=Qi-Cf8h}QD)%)8<2?%RLjD{5y}+<2IhQ^e~c+#-mAf{ z1_HpgU9UBykCl0IgNSy5|4gF>zXS*2QcCsu$)^ghC{&q}WRw+{u>6_r>NJRXfUm*&MTIM>kBNrd9*Rk;@0}IDJip~B%H!buq9rcVQoyaQ%-e3w z?q^KKB%}De0Vk}Rw)|w9XU)(##@dgpx}%N`s1KOAyfXfOTP<|(dT|U1o-4<1raNz* z(re%K8(=&SjBwi@Ykt?UQv>0l{k?R_@#FU1Y9dz(^R>U_rfcnwueV2I*neZbC#7bf z%(z(|cT>!}#P#;P?}G;W`W=wSdFoU(OV-|P{v1GZVtUH?`bDJO-~YZdYEo(3U5?6W z(&A3^1Qp7zt8$X<7A8Pau)T(Bo5hp%nh&-%2s<#1h*hke@wuFXPz}{S^5>Z;c72JQ zU8|*W$zxT-cg997kB1EO^nCAlk^qP6#oHacv{P+7iHd9n2Rfor8saV3%hXLo-7kV{oLda2_P zfq!gmuO+e`QM#SeJX+|5%Qj2NiP&|)Q3G$nx}?9S!ksH_Afw?TeWq?@l03E4p$WpZ z^UE4-$qZZ@eTtWKLU#EdPm{GfFt@2GEUEk{X8Os~c0rQ3(oATFg-2Ya?!x6}E4MQ{ z&?J{J(D~gBklev#pvulTHYnd`jB=WlicPj1ZX6Yi|t6U4aflOztg4G`&TpUBl$$QaeoYf%8zvX?}aEpM@pAy#1r zBbjNsh%q9vT!YF96v=Jfi>>&FN~+q08)4QZwMP9*lhQe$?PQ7QUMXrd$i-cqZKujw zC|xnA%Lr~g8Nkd6w@7X4aLi+p?W~_$oVzr}hx zeOdAteH@$w29e4w8Da~0A7_KcpUln{LHc=jYAV`znzRI9qqM6*iU;^k<&R6k#xPi3 zw+Ge^&_xWu5RQ)rAAQ>wDQ9!NaV~KqFX4*E$kq7cgL)jnJ11u1k|pcV`bx^37wbMNyQ2)`|>7UF@P(0unNH<*4GpTA({7 z5D+K1+~PM}^`K#9XTV`8I!1{o*GS`hyG>B*gWWd>6TZ#MM1=W9E8xgdDM}tQmvI>L zALb{O%dqU?{8O?c#@#sm> zSS>u0YDo69+Nk%jxlPI6Eg{$r~Dw~21hwW^sh_z%O{ zwOx+B;}#Uz4ty9|jmDwX0z6D+pX-9!Ug>Fzv|!v`<{fc=Chdh!9MY`ssqEtW7_t0Z z29SVOHo8%1^_IZ0tRa#hDgTq=q6fiYCG>TsraxA)m4W@miV=k_g zR3%Y&c^a1Wyw13AHy%%AF;2G`003Oe>+?K3JV3@^+&na%vjLFV1u#xiGE)LUYHOA5 zKT>M#B^!Tl*w0D>l=xjB2TTlqU=IIpvbQ#Xt$(~ht8#{vj`@ZQ$7fkV3zMFjnx*V$ zU(W}ms{zn=Z2YXp<;inS05lzg#q3v-%Yw(i@Y(Poho4&dXY~`J`?^R?K?F;c+r{eQ z<|1FU-N8gXDl3Csz0#`Xxo*rl-_2O~s7G^b?q?38$50+(D@RbEEKNWt&p2$vbP z%UCs&+oA7S!m-pg*DjNRc+`_)=at#CyiQKtY6c*8$sgQ_ZkGjdeUlxdS#!Set7}F% zwS%tur}7cQIBuBwYSr9;a>eC%x^+29*A|}Cy4yu|jp?cf^tB8h(33zi)|m0+!6a;} z?K+JMoj~%R=jm=elroL?X?&i)J^%3Op%7dQailA(2lJa(vRd{7 z+0bc!mwpkHmWe2`vfv0p2r=a$d-zfM0qh1SxPOKY59e-AFE0f{e1pY2Wr+XoUph%yFMe`_v}ulG$v>j_sK%7^G&YGnklc|ETBQpEx@O^FcY zEfk04pcvzWvd5OGDnk@}IOF+jL2pjesLORV^h?=2Ra97Ur*8`8rJ0fz3=}U{!kuiX z;aOK!z~*|+ltMO|a0sX=sc8cF_@|tm5gcCH={{}o_;~X2O##yUEc#27iXr^fcSnkZwtjCw&{|fRp-+_znU5`#S{%&G_5f$N{V%{6KlFj_dhfU(ep?Vk;JBMpsQfp5CmpcA*nZCv z#eF?grqgj|uHydsR}^2s*BSu4|H6NpNqT#|{Dau_{`PP4D$=QY$bzaL9dSznZEe@* zAAbAsvH8G2VU~yEdnLJJ*YP|?LsL^@J#(G_tn?Aa;tf8D%6Q5A3@?G9DcC56Mr2N{ zFSG^zA<#A^Yz}=TDo&yNC`D)A;*K#`uVifbO1+Vac zoZ#)Qx09|;{Xqnib!)fP)d}{Su^VmsjX}P*#i9(ym5cYc3%;k_IAFtN^J&6~-t$jC z@EvZlpEqZaXS#0-V`$wLvUPkZ+#1>FNk?l*$y1Fe{=WgX&ZqSY_XlXc=KUh4 zbrw!WMx6uYBnPa>uaed+=w0D7vDZ%KX;YVJF^Z66C$@G;irhwYgOI3co*9IH%I0N( zbO!Yg;K2wtwRLUfJ-QQhIhUzl>6bj}IW3BGxBJtcE?`m9ThDZsX*fG_Vq&6qtrdvz z;RH1_6wITiwzjzjo?VV9GV<^UV~6~rwK8j*zlKc5JDzQIJX4nf9xg6|KQELfNT!ZZ z`*UTLt+4lh8yg*A9JjjPfC!Ap@bGlokrLDCeWbyORU_kvv&|-llf>bW5a4CBFfsY< z=(ry(*eGzJ)ntV$F;XDrBZAo-8%lzub8iJzNrEoVnp~kkNFp z+4T-ECdDQ#M^;2jXH7n^&uafo=k_Ap`s9)MMn~e`;eV?wjZGp%u-i)nV%tC^43nrG zQj~K`$RKkzjwJMm@OHBrrm|2?4N%t+e;-^LHBOdiSFEk6sR7Pti2b#Xh;7OqY*ve< zW}BU>LHsB$fYjXD)`stX*|Tchg&S(3qk~WRr}{S2X@jFE-F8Kb?{#^cuM<+dLZ|C~ zZdS(kFKdlm*z)HysskqI6h0fQP_{YA7lx#*(nMu$4 zI*iWC0G*EQP#yO{`iY70$ndY0Yt=Ru7WSiwk<22$S z_(ECYE=DyDoLb*qHpXY#d)yJW$%--^N9rcePtMjiHx{mQ;dHKNk}~FZAPwLk_&C5RI6j|wq#tdFwTWa*b6P=+`9VXgxz3L`82b3tB zXX?Iv*;3Nq#>qTQ42d5l{+|{Qb4*pN6<3tF)d!Q(2*3tB)LkP4{+%CA0^-OKBeTB9 zo|Rm_ee&?|a8ah~aogtWIm@Ev&0$_tZ@n9Eh;hF^O#(L|(1I~|yqgZ7P}w%!XO&buyjB|pWdN2r zV5-j}Sk!vR%NWEBDzl`u1a7aLUqQG~XRn9)k*21W|BAfcjEg5P+z+@02L|8*3iYFS z98F9|rLVP=_h zN(SnW%iCF5*(L`zL;MJ0`u^u??yePu1V6RD+CcI2EaE`C8P#)!p7!78-E-xc&fF41 z3?o7dkdHY`F>7%%btlDtpbeR>q}vsLw_qmGCd1=C;VG0E$Zo+X5;9`Am@s)22zETV2g?jkdYVtIBZ!T6WQ4D^ZSF!;XMB* zEIk4U^eAJh{Z9LJv>!;bTZz@;k8sK z+_d*_LeHgZT5 z(YJ=>ZgAT>vP}f`XyVi7dJ3E;z19X1WtFos$bRXLP{vFA_{sbo!Rk(yM%#(eo=||};fXfyBmW?U+ub;HIhu(EMEE{psS}YSYD>Yrc z$#Y$P5NCR2hWVWm5CGI}zo_mCJ-pmZiss0b=^q)l0hfMQ2_Eov-UUxBEIg-mJz?(> zJDHh5m7ZR_onI7sN^6h}49K!yJ)+2Rezu9^fU=dz`j=~$<@9`$EmrhedIHdVGmXigx8izf$q zotJA%Tqr{_smsH|Lkw7C45;=Jm;f^g9eOWD}i0E&NSSqjfQndpF95y?&5>{D)Z z1_~}b@yWbcaSezgxt&@g;B4BE*J_+2OUcJeqg<1QzM7VeMmX+sc$Jn5n=;Fzte{qG zqeiBM%XN)`8TiRDbg^7FXty&cE`P2~3~I9mQhM!VLp#?#c1IEDRkY>Yg8lN>M2ftC zd}708>F4bev8#5FAXPogfMC@h;u7Ob7b74Z{+xt_eF zQvsmMCH#M)RxC%FV}ta?e_QvknVP2iET+~$Oth04HoNp$=O^O{-|&+z1Mlf#xE8V@ zm+k`0aRuqdNi0hCg0`cLafuTvkI>bxodEu9+yF%6A2kJ>V4(%AlO1=i~EFNfKXCF~M>%u%d%az|%K1d8r@Q&Oqt=FOheWaBT=wMlLK ztA#7N$`zkR_j_JA1%Ofa1A$%g(KsA6g|6#Z*ykaZe!p#BWuYcqHSc^AG1+Zw zlY%9(S`=~sOD*1)nVNq%9VE&ZDJ$EGnrU6%>w460WA119k9C_nio1ANGd37kHB{7V ze+{002V4nqKHNzk**5HqH9aj=+DYYaOW`>Eb-%HMhZ-rIN8ryt?4Uo#-p@d%G{6s( zwKL6qGCB5MLtl#P3FIMCzm2dsU;iYgpWbIiaUH}U^7Qtjw|=Iz~S$y#+aB;M%f;q%YH=_#HcuTyluX)*m2g3dZqzlMU;P*Bh(6r8!j} zSpR{rHCfK1{0uIq)VY0b9e;zj@)8myZ_~!$<))fpA{KG8zGc*%a#uN?I%jS{T1R=V z3t#8A;F72J;ua8O^UoPMufV&pc}`!mpZ#*1T*YAH6U*pf+7CPU@0d^r8C+4MC-%P) zi)`u{O9COW*WH@+Ok2B{9GzoL6_tfS%y!FD_v@-=thE{J=qVzEllvke5Z3wUss8u2 z&}gilU-d0ph%Ls81^w~|eX@na2)Ep5#;L37#8H3j~v zo2)sNs;Y_>Y}GwI>>oq$vb< zM^ZhRNed$PWw+Psq8HEg5V3eGX`18L?M=X6FdZW?bvU4qoi(NWv$&_q|H9alb!w-a)y zve7SfetG`Vt<39i(A7Qsr{aN_ai&z|ipGiAiu@E@N-&$O{mV=?P_M2%8l6vgIHZk9 zOnY9YfPxzQV`8iZRV@L|v=0DP+$I6+w#z{VAaEs@r@LPdV`$k=f7B}qQLN26n29> zT_<$`Wzx9)@G4!h76mB5^eyNPa>;W&N{qIoqa@ToddW=DCL^YXx$#+7lJynug-xkX zJf(=;(?FwjxbB!UpQU&;zo6v@1B2%u_(h<@0~*k(vvX}GCMI(Q;s*J|$N?8mY%dmR zU|QXf^N}4CflyEUOmquqaxV)_op*gGvOjGCQUO5vV1-5#LXt@seai3Q#j+yEznefQ zSv;uGWW@s@(zPF27kgA6cH?B<9tZh4w?nA`K`~oE=XVce5RNTO29tp#-`R~Ca z2hR&n%{-0?ec756daZDrF>WE!#o>i!B&G|8giO!~r)|%r_)^l7?bo>~0J!9H3Tl%H zSqN5G{FG>yb~7+W02!wiq`?czj}VpIBGJr%#*WFio_ND?+zyk#%-?KrNymUQ;v zi7%7u+5Cv?vZTWK4O(%$We)EpU0xjozG|I%uy#7N)s5SdyBk=a4{e$n$t8&sXNAG?L=GN9h^B5v40M;kd<9@m8R$g&%h(ya^+md*Mb2j$l^a%FF(z}`6L~1-AeM+Rj!Ta#4uLtWmw`% z_Y=D&dY(F3l~lMh#ij!CFRN2dE0Yb20*$xX{4<PH9AaJX7H6wqZG5|+W@*O#85Le zE2A3^GMw|OZlI=MW z-sF{v@4#%%-xm;G33D)jl!M|Xj3iGW>o=xN@`BD*7dt)WgXythBQ0M=w%9ZCIYgSL zPk=aAy8pZ&1eJ}KJYcADQSZ$szuokEM&4*=SUYjdw_qCG4foA|8;jG^SL9yTxbCaUaedD*koYYD!PS9%~iq_(;`6xjQJo9~{OK74@e`u5SSSzFWh@+`(ABO!kM z>U{qT84oi5^^bCLh9U9H*{=L-Ml}d0ADnj1-$)mRyo&}AFdcQh|LYPo^f=MjbOl5K6` zUtdADa2p9-P)lEUM5Ogn^-+LvMu(B5Y-{lBm=00iePCeFkSP^spc`@Omk3P7?xDdF z_u>PP*A|Q@1cDUKqE05Sc*itql;aK1d(546{07{4YfrLC?Y_T3w)o$nK40)}A&wrQ zvoWH522T}t>r6teoRK4D82!yRBRDo9fwSDRa-V}9weLjTE)ru~ zw?Ws!e%1-v3x#7Z?b-o5W=@R6P~i15gM3_1K0wx4E)ia9!XtQ}v1iP+_{OQ#yRIaZ zy`>npu|o0G>8LS+F1ubNGRC{8E+7A#x342?s(ILd^j*stDmk*Iw{b)m+6swY+V-RPw5jnndpm=0!gY)&-qTD{r~lE!$0=hs!7+$R zP6v{Anq`LjJ05+Bt)4|mbvac}kEhtA^FJ-1^)Q!df_vSQ)2t*Du}aK+t9xB9o};AG^D<4nuFsk_fjfh(oghG&;?ws5=|a*zc#@Je zNt4J3Y&IgpvG;{49eU<_0fk>1_#itwg;GZ{aVtM12l2CVriHP5X#S>rGx9grmq7LTI=RlDxV8`TXIo$>y_0tRu54bTFwQvCS;i`b=HVvZSp*Y zJ?77lP3Wbnj+SnOEFK6dSeiuwu?xQLhQoFU9E-&hIQCOhJMG+DI-vjoiLDwBeRLe>bRKm>XwW0^twAb5x8zk~u56$| zvL4?SwAVTHth_na=eFYojB5VmegAWhi_};Jb>c?znfeV{ zn1ETKbS10uJmP)8Gt76BGKm9}3SIZ+T~OamuH$!aAX^E}`}*OHNl_%WtX~GKf5QKF z{{qE?&QpR8VIKAPr7kr>E0lu<3FZ3JFzxo<;l_5T(7Z|dSul4`fVS(rlFGW>BoDpE zk)$l|lYx~2hsvln!X-K``){BN+f{S{W-6U6<+`g}ocm#kW6K7WKSfktC{!0X2~W2j zw#Qhd_wUx8ywY_2r1>Nop%W(jExMbzo3ha@`YYe0{$2GnTh$RQ3fS4@loT{{z@ITC z?WfBTnXXt`LTmK7o$J9?i)Y1T`x+=r&hrOA$Oe6xSG71taCLS42snj?yaxS-LM)Lo zv6a=LZsuO(*P`e@%LN=TH5!-65CszJ(vbPvg#B;_J~A7m9>j4LiV?YGV}Irkc}x_^ zl`Z&1Ga&eGf0!(z&q_bu}wncAM0lK)IHa0-&;rnzvXWdrv{x+5FXwnviiUSqb z5P{#G_8EY}#rUtv)mu7-guJ+4wSEusdJJmndOiENfDY?;LgV7kKUHntQYT`~=_Y6A zfbTqPzOHZfP)HQEk02n>sKD=g?6>27TeBUdby{~=JOQf2SsAVfOEpaeK(D!P{4*rbkAL$Y-d<1s@Y?nZ?DE@a851&)kct4L;W6g@9#%2nDfi zKq607lrz`&`W-FgI4dQENjxC!GVYji3~o{7%#I;6H~)|c@SKAE_uaZ?Z>>9Rdgwg% zV(8j*Z27{Gk&z+W#3r&u6i>$cI&7VvpL;zQdBsBOEh5y43w)x106Hn~DNmiNP?giQ zmN*$p_{@d2p;IaKvMJ9GwU(m$gPL{p_@cbyve?$xP|#3T=jQBeZ*L#Y>nIIh!=eT@ zgoNIBaQmv1?DUEIy{&c)k!t!TgI3As?8QsYTp>z!AgjG~VH=Q!dwO~RBp~m+xI8K; zA0RP4%Km5hA^9&YcyDAR*>N_6QkL)aR+RTTrm2087SNKZqhb5P2yhiiF&^mJ0y_16BL)p7A@u8d+f(@sI`BE$a{0(l1ROAZ7w zfsa1|NO5g_^Zue#bxO%zOKbg31!G-F5eed3z8IXax{2veFiH}ipIH948*b+>lTMlG zNl!-m>Hj>M_BMV*S=_fBNLe3v>}R-aGUz|wpGj6Un=_Kzo{AMg4h=Dfj;Cx7ij!yf zZ&IsN8o&*$o4?qx8)H>01ES;o`MOR~zLg9uPMoe1ZBbT$*FN2+ve-4RE9tG>U*f-} z)l@TH;AX-cdCMgblLp@R=s55jN(;i_CPeG#hQE8$EjLa^#_@5uLOZ#Qen(lB;+WMVlyd3hC7=gt3tl; zsP*eF)GD0ee+9t;_{hq1q`c69+jsn5JwsJx$s?47#7FWYX%LxB0Yu;1nY9<(-F^Uu zw%8=mig88#^DkBm*iGQs{*coi&ewTdZ?grz_0AxrQUZ(c*4osD8^0a7|MGeyFPl;WM|8J72eSaY{PDBzOh&+5igNCEXwDwR0Yiaj zhpR)A#jr(x#UBicc`Z-5X8l<=x9LK7w1a zMqAmR5nzgQwu<6|d@2q;3Bf-<)oVKajLm+)I%97K+$BYGQt(Ho>unghex$HlXt~J( zEuS`RVJIrg!3jU%@Jh6^r;0O#GIp*FMcNK$y}uj)N~7oVY?jgY+`gHFQU+Zvr;~*< zE@0MrGs)LwvCMd7kQWD6U_xyIIetDBax#s}<@l4;Rx1!M{4XnUrW}r_8F1HwZ{l$| z(n$M$`OIq9)0Mr4gO~^rNYUnaw%z?hhmb`mhdz4fN0k;E)G?#URJKS27OhTaI|GOI zk^Dx=PD??l{@}zofUvvXh;1-u%asd(KNM4nLT4Y8$a$+kc~^;j`7RvUx`2UU&2VaR z5Ne!xMOcn<#2JK02~UKB?*+v_p~Q?A#0}}q+QZy)sa>PjpUPsM+GH}_=>gp?c(bjv zJNC_gt<$5e4Xs~=(`L`|9;PU5FDpeC#OR;Tim7f(xOVC^#xmACbO4Ph-_DJ60;LwD zq5GAV9z{@CGZnSJmbXd197OoTPNkET!8G=he6)JVPK!#vzBZ|hnshdLI^2R?zW2m6 zCyoGUXx(FC;*N9luYr?YkDc}TZNSN1(08<$J>fkSf9l3nP2jQpo9`GW@UAy+n>W>- z<&@r>*_8Vj4TIrgM<2)q=`0gvqfBEUor}%kkDhT-0h2jOR+Yl#ku#b#oIde+Ty^^f zBcjo^V_EbHG;BDFi@fBxOICG<Out_7{EX^r{dlKa3tGh~@#BbA=+ASHPSzlPe4tNO+~dvLD`LuZD^(p2=u9 z0@Q>bGGnvpY+|t4=Qw-HPJ0TCMgyzK}^;j>})}PVhOMi)9pp^uO`xIV|L4v^oAngPm@*(t^#n ziqTVg&7N5lTG%+3Z_I3)DKB8?zM#mySZ|{r6gXM@vjZ}WGJg4T)udFm@L^UugCH?x zX!lI6fKn0RYKs#nIOG^tS@2g144p|+RQJV+2!Pu&JyH#b2@*&zXDC6@ztF~S++Zb~ znXA_R;dHS8-l`hjkuu2J0L9Ti zn8+XUljXYm83ktt3^Y-?J&E|gN27bcQ&nuVEC!VL{9WE-s0&ntwb%%9> zzTb!j>sk7vMBXy8DhTQyP=Bry15Oe8_iOqJ^@iNvMk9OuuwF{Ai4eZmfPv}>n0~z; z$$9}YOecx2kvx0>qcB}U{Vu?4%;9N%xgMRC%kH7_;v=%1z%NB@4nkxS@r9WhLQOsB z55vf-J?MKjt{tP`wZ<{`I<7aFZWoU$gwDZPZ^F3c-;*H_J;uCEmh_H_)ugvA%0zKs zSj9#&o5{cO0sm(_mfm81FyZ+s3p^NtibeT~2d3S{6n;zURoWhnK9L*=q&@hwak5Sa zhT(gH@wFTYF>T%Rr-sCC&8>*DB6(7|y$Zyz#$8ka&&Z}~3Ot97=&K89Z8Dq2ij-l$ zIne8E{bkEMMb1szNJbuxN{(4l_Uc)Q%Qw-oc$ZQ9DcTE7b!M_3;bDqvU?A8D2)Yq7 za;FoTsB~ZtZocMBJ=gvE6FBud61c2(hhmJh=ZTFHuz`o>WgF1xfI`H&KNJlxDgqvo1i>U|3q+7ssqI22%SZvbuVeD0`EFbH9hvgUS` z^zL}xa;~^1hD_R7xbYrIcYz2)YVZMo%WeMfc>XH)#5939Tcy}|oWjdU#IBfTY&;vdKKrS8&vqXzuqPQV^oi9`Ay6lAm%4gRkIxXiHkbSuP z{_+uQFQ;FS%+W>%*KM~Pm=5rQIvmGuVRX{}PYaluwl0T>l%_ZknC(*$A0yKLqgddX zVXV}hz3qaSN0IPJ;Uvr>a7|c8NxjMH^-oX~jcWB)1>5HFa@|36j-Yy@iOuZ~0r&Ok z;N&vRbX&&#osk5=iU*t2Ct~tEL24V7Vk}1xSSfq};@68W0VA}5Y{W{HKDbNPKY#vA zAj0f{g@GwnzFfNO@q-3r;7Xw8a6FvqF*g&Q*Zs+!_TyLYc7K>krKahMGNn$9gD+q- z&8ED(h?C`YIW8#zQuTg}8(6V;A0GlQR}>bD8Q@H??s{d7?~v%f&z%1zCpy(LBLt1U zS^DxQP@zW2Zwf|DoZ%Z@%YaMWe3M0fvNpdrGb0#;2uzpFCpXgXGJqij@7)|qRoB(Z zk-kV4&pnMv9U?AoGF*Wv<+I6`0%_ES0X>^CJ=*d}$Xp02f^4&Fa1VIkLo8FMgNNf@ z0Z&uQq-^lt2wQ?c)Ax?;>{rl(%icaR5|SL{kA@_BjL#X^OFN5QZw?7w;`2NTTHrpl zze;=p?>F2oUMHM7^=)-CJej7# z;zE7>_mIV5X9OHCz}=Hl$022|a$54Z@B<}JVvZ9v8&{Iac6l|;?XR-$*r6UB9WnO> z>%k0t$no503#zNz^eWI1kx@A>?xfu{SE5EU^KNSl?0`HikcbIZ`f~80ojw{hN|%MfwUA@ znjV0)kgj_Mijdvxkt&^(;&Vi1b39hZs;@XsK zH@sE7u9!*hmdmH11Ctf(Oc9%@eHePS-2NhrL4(w@@165CJNT{bk=u3S#S?88op3B% z_gIH-LAZbSE0NXlz85BpbAd6JT0|I}>oi-HDQ=r`*sgg9Q#!ilx$iXX17A5!O@=nv zVevo(rQL(o>|tNHix0ObIeMwm+aYpU?@A5-xbB8}J`0@WNu_#hn}&M0aX1kh+_S23 zXXuo8)N0hmTEkze<#AHW0o?T@n|;%G(~-3CQF-#uCaufmZBNAGsY&xKGZ<2GTr!OY zV5wQ&;litD-^c_Ot>i7Vbhy#de1k_;z-K~)19Qt&TkwSv?Dgc8*Z#Y5geS!< z5~CtM$G~`H0#*D=ooEzZDHen4t;zmstHTMfeiKsnAmHDqJ0at*auC_B>6 zCg7zqna-7@Yw5FPEJrEELPSMwe>eq{ki7(z{N;z!WqsUnr6(1$anz;W8onH2lkdT< z7lX}*xnb2~wJ5^5v8?<|Anp3t>*vo#nvRw8)tFF+lnGyK1zuL`O%>u{HBxlL1%}3b z4jfZ{e`@{e-~=tlzi3LX5nIVGZA~qPKM6D@V1-l;sK$#hll!qoPGLcFNJ$Duz{I@` zuvY>wZm$hsSO-iHsTv3OIq4gydI4MWWe#TLT-fPh@|$L z11AS7{+`YT5SO>-{JSdzr(oo>t!$cyg*F@dYiFxkcDg1+ImM|^(>WFId_jgZgfc`+ zT#ZH*ySLVRhrRQ8g=DJe0$^%#%d%T?hLd_|xwVw3#+_=f1wT~olMJ6G8!^tovfPe@ z_C4{|aEe4>qkI-o?vxQ)Z?SI^SIdv@7DQ0o8}p!JF#@f53OMi6>Gu6;8HH)%Xsh7- z;2^ImZG<|rK^|VNRlsEMxj};;_;Ptq6K}9GP+N7_o>XoV@2}aB z-Yo;aDwfX^xpsWI-UCFwKU9d?D@C$dz^qAQn(%QVjjamsMmvY`CDCdGUaF30G?>j- z>F|-UIGt;X@ma3atJUa1+WJHm1B7;EPIxTlEkwF15R}ESe$ICmGt~D!Dps#I_tPu= zw%3ZL4Xhu!-N39fn6chs8QBzgJbZfyzWjXx8W*`O;B@~UaB!1Ats>Cjx6S_sJ}*jx zh9sx8wKOp0U}%ENMI7PY=^~vbrA$L+=y^ejA9hG@A;en2Fuhh`ZWi4>VqDcdJ{OI; z2ObSSHUfMd4yQ}gXc&rTpQ#+)o(?u07PVBNN)ioreYsQHsGDOcO~L%faQo;cXEJNp_cBsDC0M<23_rDt$D^scbG z-CLB80YB#hZ2ZPyY@1`f_6F({nJr$Al<0R)HTzDykZ~(h52a3N`bcBNT|mX_ZrTE7 zVWJ95i4W*aEOlbt?HSZqMmITQLXy7543{}J4SDIrD;!jl`KnHF(2OKb6l)>Gv|FsU zaX_h2+2=~9ql7UR(WW&(UzG;wD)g`3_YuY60WbI`NIvwBUFqj_&Rn9AgIkz_J31j6 z)p%Q^0qo2Jgm}cE3?`M#A8Hq=C9x=d6iGYQ;01kxgfUVyTz(h(>{S`Pw`UeOd?;gpK zdtea+Mm^R7;4t(kAs$3N#rwCd0HOyJ`5-3@RAd8M|5hhsGRGXQ*ze1&9#!aru@sd1 zOR!RubOh9k_Cc_Y8X{31ic4F4&zxb5M!~3umJ)mv_0InrgM~XXVmohISuH$1-(jx{0CSNyRMF0=@kU(?X-H17p0695g2O43`^Z=y- zZxseHBLP}?tl*;w&S?-Y(2Omeqys3Vp%~(r)a7JOpX-$R1cQzPb)}JD7IRCe>h=kV zngHS!aTl%(I|*1LG_IYgS{30VTwBmLYmjNIhdQ}!$R!<(b|W#GxPB2;LB0G)&EI+s zfyiCy@v-h2N+TfM-HoI)NOyO4 zcb6bto0O974rwHnZlqI?EMtn3Pu84Qh$eW*CP4n}H$@c&fDvFKF7ayuH`X+p(R7(tO zzdH+6nvM99hiY=1m}ICt_%3cvtR_lo8M?InJL0jN&TBks>t`EX;byz4cCkcHz-)ED z6^>EJa^Oy!>>n5*R-|6aV}gaLCS7Snex%GMnNckzHTKK&vG>uS+wbD-zpJ-~hXr-# z)x&Ua!e-zM?!danZBv0(L!0_6w1m#~Ws`TW;--mgbGLiCZKdNi;+?9lJ*qv#83b)T zUL099utF`fdW($`79{F}eO#WmC>KOx);`;nDJ!G81ggBGQ$C3fRjFayQ3p;%%b^ zul<}A*y)J91-*(O0^r#{o8x>0{EDA-Wb$T=;w=1MH@RxJNVrjEuQszb%3if!5{{wL z`ai~3ZAz1@^Q>0@r)NwudA&qIs) zRED39<$etDVIPwlB}0>7alZokpy(B??n`|0em-RJO z79oEKPPpV)X~~mquXa9pS53B@*x`rUUQvF_2NEpckl{a=v^wC8^V&>iQqI7`k zDfoPL+wP~5j7nDH6l2?*sGv>B#v>`rh%L!Qiq#& zB03yHI!rHbUq`b1&ogyF z5ZD^Ec9R-CKkX;`dRW*r%aESQ5B6Bpe7%kPrOEqLGOweuL7L+dcpMl4yW_n|;q;Osuz2x(v(g?B03v zOP+xa@hx0d+6&u)AYR;Rusy+XzWkMrjEC_k-Aan>i%S1_;gpwhO$i;BB3KQQi#y(g8&%C!7MmiMGgW| zwZ}6>aD%d#b>t!er5mc;^||Tvy*H#%GE&_?t7{sZ%8ftYC?uy3B^%EQ&{!i5W21;n zOJayDG+N5aby8-Pci3pd^$y(V^_m7=NS~U4$br9_L)D7gr{&BBqKi!3BKkC{LLJIW ze;UuCE9IHvl_lbv4VRujI?0REfd|}xbomE+pKyYaFqflmMG)difxXZ`C`XFAR+1zd z0EjUoAjrvegBMDVnw8te+%P&MrTTo#r0{_S9vx7;u#!5&FvGA&;+T&ad@|>fLlrS} zFRV6!f(t6{5Kb)P@YygCw?DG#YkYklRGUu$l8~4C6F^AuYMeB3F(X6jLtGtha?B4# z6a}BM3}?n`V~82;fZ5jX?kn_5gboDB{I|iPgR8(#_S&SIP;d{7(bU38@;Nu3;9wKk z<|gN?3O(3$tZ{pDuztr`Bq3p!0^Ielu#8*;vVY~;^yrt3 zKG_&*Gs#Yk_M9IQ&15Z)#*Nd};mq5#cttR`o7vZ7bckr_{}snmstC&=u;=D1kwszR znBJMi#4Sg(;>Oe(e@~Nw zA9p{{$R?8Tp)2P4_m?pzJBv`k;hnw_A2zD&G(dufPa{dUU$h6HK`r&QQ9I^|8Gu_2 zWO8wju&nTsQD|ABK@Z*jR}Gh3!eSJePY-`U!yaAlJKZ`1X@b53PYy#h(<7Mkz?njE zR`QlX#urC?b{q=GqDn(=B82V20Sqaz2=(p_f${1D*QE0nr^*Er^-SYGRcq1>2C4DS z@!I2@ZKIq~L_^I_liYIr7j%mkq9(F!V-Qjj$}ow@FF z#~I*OYn^hGO@s3*URQ_1VoEQLcafKyaS(Iy7aa0_m#v7GIE8#|dlHxOJTw7=m(RtP z(OKQhtjFB1ofl|OU^AE01hg7<)R8j|z04I<8RotzL3Trza_S7OUU~rJz5p&q5Yq!`f z$a_PVY2-wtTLIa`<+RtuTUWLw#MBK*^R@cipNWpE@Df~CRq16V$Tl?LbQa-_W|S6t zCYj!krw?#urgbeb4a~J_+wc%DpOGJbyeQm-V?AK;!XGBNY{EB3ciLw)&0P@2b6Wfm z>sIx-xYS=o!i?5h#UxC2WltcQjvk@&CCmA4(%a|D33kbchkk-DVown(wagh$3WWBm z=;RqhJEVJ+!140q{oh~E=-%>|n>Vbu!XM3pl=U1R9f@jW?d|^!J!Fq!7Oyi}^OJ`E z*s4uw_OC-wql+kz*PqJF5E=>hO&pbL@Hpf$>~qxz*to3Z5x(93>VUw+ujn40oAfb5 zqp&0KHnDG0uc=6I%k|RyeZMkB1c=UMXPtuRL){#w#US!6)kg-!ry7gzx?r<+VpruK zNa%0;4X1Oe_cZPb}`66R#s-@NRTNn-Yt_<>TlbaTP_vL zP{Fu4K=eKN?4{l6gc6Fh1WfnI3nF6u%C0MmCe0eNGbd$F;oUdU-(W#5K{h@pvlm2t z_XrtiT)nt05N6|Ds-(8<_do4eo`YYq&#&oSfwk(v!z-g9kGSvjN`t3ZKBNH=Kf>$6 z+@oYfgD5>dmJPrQ|}WAhaR;j&q;2&Ch-Y?hchw~h(k4dj7Te@=2`3!akcX*1{Nj1#7ynoxOfuU&4e-!BW7XO3&jY?qSg>{WsCa#h$a)2 z`V$_JgN7*X%Xfea9}S~T#U{-Eog^;4PD^gTzsC~6P$Z$~Av9g;_Ncs13)(5m6pQ{0 z9b^;cxTi*jNaxJ`=-yM+d|#$(s7{n65{Bse5=}vRBX6R0CH#{uCAT$?4H&E%3c!GU z3N=fgt!K$%7pKA1;Cr2lD+qk2JJl4lo^tW85)w?zhcwo`fE5N(B;b-Yjbl-=(OtcZ zlkhNlZ8TWp|6a_+&gImv3-lj&wA%7q9G$tiX>>0z+l~{P4A2@ zI7`a7%Tq4H{6@qVoS67$%qEB`&AH3Tw z9-g;45n>DuhfQ$LgOyiJ>z$mnDzyAK8yfx{S$nUum@W01!iDk|M;{Hw;{3fn_8cMeg*s%Qp4vhp85mk&jEZ)=Z9g|da%a0= z*;Q7ZV>Y4MghU=L8h-o6w(T~Z^>+d{ZFsUJCtTU`{uQbKqj5^*jioZw>>>kz8E}~A zdp;XRX!Ra}DqrIAY^AZpn^BN*i!f|+0`NU!I7hWoO;qcy&1#|$g4Y$wsafNV^QQXh zl=5aYkNY1@hp(Mho9Gx7qMk!@AHmE0^rt@f3HZT9ehG!HuQx zPWTcm0}|b{Nh>W12?88FA|UAtc=gC-x65+6!@r6=D2&0 z=PBXl7>D5Dc}Ke-!M+~L*L}fen&sVz&94x`adZYs^DUFj&Oq!20leJXy^L1)ez)Pw z8h59s@LV1ci1tAZ1h>lL17~F|mW8+Pwlxd0n|JY~2A=jvyzX4e52~poRI4IzPn`qp zjyn^&noCDNwFPq&4Z)6!*x=|Z$iM@#A5WxVe3Ov5K`#9+l!ZG^K|VEB&z8dGTQ1Xs z!>y^d&e9vtb0qi$YEoBtLJ#g6f}+HRg>K3Lz)7K=@)gPyVZxp!lv&{A@+#3)5x*Sg zX;Hjh_nZ!ezmyZ3k=4qZ;E2I!n+OQ6^Z`@$W zRdSZoz3zp12mkQ@r$y+dI zOclJPU=w@C0r2h=znIAsqs}mwG!LY0>v3g4tfVNX$(dER+ezJnAOs#efcDf+r9c!) z`N6^={gpPK+^rYfe9V+vDW5d9DNj#SSS90kQR`6JO^u3&iKozuJnOkNsZ9X+Pj2?O zvDGXGN9Sf?pmju-KY`EA5fGF6Q3e7leswgxQc%h44N7`2ydWiIA@LS*VRhD)coWd~ zLi#RumY$#f>elLQxArN93>5kl@<1KXqJLMX^ZgI9Fmrmnt2`ovk=kA!n*$c--#Ny= zbC9+V_k_Odz-33%(gn>pfD>8Zw-ft27+9eHJ^dDcBQ8|{(j3s(D@;WYF!UD&MGkua zz_<08a(fj0@fS2X3o_|KGYkf;;^SZ<`g;Qma?x)eVFXiw)on^-r5rnN5m4-6Ug{D~ zoxgy=2zcp{E)Eu@v`9PA&mCqwa8rsate?%AvTWu)}Ub>OKt06UFTCfFIJvg?Jn zxkQg7<7kO%E>t2NhYv6VRl;iL=kcC80wSF%>H=)NMT3RMOQgOY1*-2QdTbPaTQE)- zPd|0PhAD^<5gcg$xd}TJG}n$8MlgivC8$fVo_^{GmC&e(!ZLZP!v)B6>OU#9u(~j{ zreda**I@yfhabXDF_&L=>m#zbhMClBiG)V@V(J&ro9Cf!G}z-Zm)wAEaPNZFr{Z@Y z&*rk;-sl={(i4zC@s_;W(vGl@k)9@UGMZ!N$pnayVE$rwdS7#A052whw#}fF`NEmQ z3zzW_EaHPtryrC(w>^r`=g6=3QB=f{^4LXRv)scQ`us}Wtg_aBRRbM9o6B@h==qm( zDlsEOI(A?0KeLiVTp}6#Lq-i`uIa*m4+gRcz9F17@9Sl7kIa12s?LcDY`yvJ+*Dl% z-bxy&SpDd?&lgFKOSK*Q8HR<9ZMThY0=^ z@a7nM5YY&6-w%|fo!}EbsnM-}?!$Qh!kRti6Xch(L|$AsCZRzexQauI#OLD}nMG@q zEJrPZGsPb6Ji#H3k^9ICi0PrPU>Je5{P+&%!*4EL@?sOHRk9lK20?_D3n4EmBM0x$ zTR+`(s_eYRg$ROt!sF_LvI;Z4@u!xC7pqrdHe_a`_^Vx6xrU5=nrmtFua3ZbkIK~# z69@!GFV5J|)u{)xyk)$V2&8`C%trD!8QAwUR%_W>CnOv6(Qz5Hw>fSly_~!$g`+)1 zgT}6)Dfptl`<_ae%M}K1Twl1yp*XS{zgq{#htWKT*BNECCIy$d$prlH;E@wQ3qjRw zRx8(+CAcLzrNFp{87LL(;Cip_T|Mjmc2gdi?vdrXHZ;RxnAH{;}a~bR-w@ z`al%|$+c~*@LP8uEAm*M<3J0_Wd=q!$IS`c*CkD-9EL_>hBqyR;}9A{GSz*D0#}71haiD|Gv- z+UR=$O_hJ;$`0wGKe?jtw^d%>!~P7Mha;s@52O=Xhg#hPVqCg@@&3mZTK$$WlxVwW z{}P9UK@OB&5;_h!T>x74R0H>XPFG;?ZSOT>cXC?PPrr`fRu`}QWqj)Eq^7B)6djJY zcyEmr`HiqHWfyPb#-JJw@B5XQ24m(uiU4_xID@fPl_M9z^qDn!Q+Vl>a94m9&XSFM8(}>d3{q(R$)kzcsFn!;?_M|i*BYbAaJVjTYPf3cu` zSw!s{b49H|?>~c`aMzZ!{zbHeXrP@5yIR2KRB!Ey0VcU$Hqm5s;=Q*MKd~pw)X{_H z_R1EX3%4Lj2pP_G%*4@oE_nlM^l+|DZA=z!(6)z0&LM0v`&tBfM{Vg0WhFn#={Kpp zZ#FFo)}JtRa8(?Z`_M|-^L4dPpBGLWge;3qVpSDN4IW8oyuPo1@z)s~M<^kiXZE-$Iw!^3{*w99 ziy9@Wvui4j2y%E}#V|u-&tMJyYyF?zKAsP3g84}AtRc?U7>Q$|Dv>FCCwcfQ6jwE- z1YhNB?%^Re%N;S9u(>1g4#SbjR+UbTogYuG=8DG0xreoRh%lG*ePAz7KhB8l^|M>7 zP8Vw72)KYx1rDwJ@XaGBT5EKwXEEF~ln%@JjE{}6P-EmyJR9a#NXSpwnHNa#q})eM zwPLBJ>WmBbXDmlIYWp?jRUfusv~G734l|+&?;$i9x)`SpUfLcPi{88g3z>2061YO9 zk@2v77CO28>irs0(Hri|5SvT7D{zF6Fhqz>qL7L}yuFPx#gu`KSW?4*SM4dAgU=-w5M@yR?KU(DG zp!dA)xU|51H;$(rzWU9}$?*?+bZ$J7tBH+2GGbJ2G(MbiWUj1v7TGL9t39$-ntQT1;2jeg{ zd~c(S{`@0=C9MX~&}Ga0VX<7cYKv3~lO0K<0@#K&ckY*C42C&E9(F?p!R@@+6}l^4 z2fAZu^*cmAe_?$}82?O=#oLnHx){rqoEg`;I5gKpA$}Z=$WK{#K>6Rz(y=AGp;*}+ zmR7UM$Q_g(Lu{XtrTgi1K-KyAd^jOzf@vSwbfe*I{dbhrf)Ce+M68~nSUx`%{sChIFzD< z%LkRY-wpg?bQ`qnt!y%59jQA#s8qKYm5-9Mj~rYR~+$q zT$O|D7-)D)Vj6=5fKzp;P{~WCziUu&fzgYtdDL8g?e)AW_j^TWSRUTfZCqS|ueIfR zzAz}DgNsJyi!oaxqO1B0_CQ=KLeajCy8y=mXtd-RTk|mdH3iYpoaCSkm6P^`NN}*T*5Nbo^a1UhzK3$3D$X{%g) zWf{M}ajZsp0lT}2$qyKB7MAnI79>IdC8cNHOu95Asy6PJ9@!V|zXv4;bIAF()2C_N zM-hBeuvg67;`wi-8t_nXNbQVyt~*16vm&s-6YHGE`t*u z;?pypvV@-wIXN%@xuA-}0r)rnp^YR+DOsKH*Acd|RBUh}c(td&Fce7dyxD^fqd|Z7 z2(=>>Xo=GGx??C}?|%i%+&5rnh_w*_h_FbjRDw&H&KlCdEHKdn_nbY5+WyyT3q zBwoTV(6Gj58t22>i(>LbBS1B7pw6!RNn~spy~EJ9qYXpl2k1uRw(W=8-}TtLR@KAd zT{h5|$osniiZ6hk2iJ@zh9I8DbyWteLUsS4MCi}@|9%^&Xhb{!eT^_wYpKl~N5Ac% zv=42EgB3RG4WU!aAVu;(OG$>@c$QC_`TTf8?N{yO$yEhb$Aq{p3@Z%SwZJcXu6^D~!~=Z%WBz_@K4M zQM{RYpV|nn_{qMs0mWjn2@Ae@AOk+P^bx>{n1HLfrC{WtqvSTJ6%zi3rl53SXyH-Y{v zUlDPY>Nne1|F{$ULM5nrib^Wzg)9VHBAWzt8Sy%=MMSqW6YpX}3U$S;uqPXg|WU>@guBfiwOd(`xCz9sqff?C#ws;6Q z{4uak-b~iK!g*siwm(jkqgZ15v{=^68bFrKQeP-H_2Ce?*^ln;Hld@OGjMC5e1Wil8{f;eNw(h7V z9ab{hs>TMll7L-CO3z0!FC9A_C^F9^?`w2A)&ISNE1>S&B9wi6^Xx+{O~K;pblByF z1_dP(>9O}XZ3+0VjX*Esd*1I4x>N8uHDJK89FFe*TJC7H_Q4F-iQOV!$%8tiEQIli zIpXuYHw4wuw{P#kk_~zu-@toQsaAro1BKFXi{tI$*;i|q#c;xN8V7@^q2)AL84?~l zN>Q{d`X1#uq`MIALOp+P6;IbnONn=9fX8*`~e_rt)v8^o1XU zu!~BNxtZkb!Sz@1xd>F$6o6@#vX@dI<7DD8)DLt&Sy|S&pE*X0X?urZ>h`_y z^=WhlqF&AZwkW{gUhUXf97v$fPmqI4KDMvOyBVcP3R#jE7%<{jS<&~>Qy$6pTLicj zpzlVf(Kxo)({p@t@Wh83o#((2!kp(Qk6hSi&sjg@67!I|++*Epx29If(XLfvgdk({9TIJ z$f78*y#5UgGqp-cUE_GZ$00$A#g)P0A!X?sR~Dv*H!Z>jG8wq~k?RNAV;Yjn>n@?{ zSoGGSpe$9UQO=frXmKo?hB;q!G;B@lN}%FJz>GIu9KF;E)N zs*M@)1KvCd*OrW1GcRi2rP8`1804}cNi?d&?_db?1w54PbiT#QuRgPEb9dm|{s+?R z&(+#BfY2)5Q5m$`tG0eWG_zGJ#Aj~(5sB&oWqLN=%Y|0VbC#hyi^i5w^`f1G^jhQF z;&9-%mv-NPrIPp{FMT{Rg~k(A!AhBJ2J6CM!$@F_a<8h zuNeiDs{_ZW1M`PEih1L&(`d;xmBh2&GK%HA_bMI~ujxu6r~4sWx6V|io;YZT%&3<2 z0|X^pIJEJ*yZ#I@dux9oXJ@Y8XO;^5`|C3>^1}Z?xMf;Vb1|QL?82rmvX}l*$X=608I)_FpIUGvCBQz@$YkSCLHNqbb(+`nm_2%Php*4mF{;PZC$Yw9l*Ufd~Bzw z_2x67+;=O}u}Oo!iNbQ89rNSsh)oZXv4(7um-9&<({Zb6Sy<*HYZU@kQ58AokAM@lWdAI(rgwC3A)Y!aoN~J3_?bk~3_gEqmF2m`e`(${ z$=3F8r(b_)rEvcAY3{NqIiqR@*o*k-kx%&mB!s0<*A!vIWVV*~3;Z_S#!{u(+v-!# zB(6cNdw-LlMU7*4oNUt-7((52>qmu+bcHqh6?hl@+RggH#KRG@ij}e?a^y&;WhJPM z+TEyl)bC(4tjMvnhC`jhX8X#;^i_o~q#)I43u7Z%FqpBVTt~oiz~i#ce|mxXS363K zeY?jHn^}PR#73O1)Z@XJ;alny!y}bXYMiVJ3(i(q-xLTz(|*lsVg& z=i48${A^A8tyX!&U<_NUamrBk3eOcGeU|>rF0?wea_36ue_R0R$~bb_+&7SD85ceKeDR|@gl3arWNth(HL|5Q%oqAxzxM6;a{I6e9 zH^@S>zgW*4@b27S0>>CHlz($G>SH0Qyq-|U->pN*9Ov9#RD*@OIiYl{{8U2(YciZ9 zy#Jp?-6EOy7efS8|6*0d_I2U=k@Pv6wge2x1!T$rN`g!8+>Rm<^g2>oP{v%{3I?w8 zHW00XjD8A!!*jqXyPaZ`X4gEsAmn?ND;gx&!Q!Q3_YXXzCBMa@d+p^Rqs8*ptENqH zp|78Z*x!dbCw_P7a=zRfI}lB*8fb(!-52svmupO~U$UR=Nh=AvbXmJ|_a)-$uUPCP z=GTzHx3A|a*24E6m8-!1UK&{Dz3Q6Pk^E268s+C=xiX1peVMFtM}&o?7jP8<=VNa+ z>oU$rbJDWKzj8vOqhPGT01dUM^fDj)wd(x`!8cuq!%`NF)$sX(2Qq@8JNl(?Y|a*yuaZ1quW1oSNMzi*#^94R&~^nKrJ?a-{??W1+O)KYe@3q zKJ@2r0N)XV*k-U{-q4!mtC4N`?IyUqNHNUQgLwRsR!1vtWfs*32EIel+YXGkj~vPp zTobIZTerp1amk~A^6T?VA41Vv3$1?THep{yR3_*Y*w&o*`vKZ}bN2+K*|(sU3gEl; z)20bP6-9hHjFb^DM5ZDP1}twg)QM(5SbzQ-*aW@+4aD(NM--LvuJ)QQ#8BHIh-FUP zz6((svc^>m3yBmsZS<3{7Ia$S(9Xf4LtN>52Yh#N8=MO@*dhXp#R$AWxmd$Qb`$Gm zAWNs-C&>S}=K(4hoY&jkxBDZg6OTw{ zgtG%c8%%nn8xlX|R(qKDUrx4=Z+y75K^Yv{53@^`;)kXlj_d6gKne*4viKiB*IG|x zeDXK1q18I4egrs7+erY3>GxCmwt214USV7yqbk^?_bEaj)lc4Fu6z%m0g~*~K6`NN z+ai-Ykfpf-Gse?M@S`lqJ5w106Zi!%#5{oL7c#Rqc#c6NuYf|(t8%=S6)%VJ5Jy$G z5fp~eqSLe5q&A_lGwB86zq@58Q9mf^tK6cAT(gx@7N8ll`uf2g#?Yha8UO8!^~}>J zFmo(as)N?6$kQLy+AM-3{&=w!RL!38tI&FIhN`mZhdn(gPE z6$qc!5%eSL09GcB{V!(RvE{uwYAd2A_wlcLnW2_$1#><(YgP7VTQ;VQIo^`?7NlwA ziauB}AyaRPCM{-DTrujxdgUD6AW+Qe7sRJ*r5jtOd|t^=5SXG0#$P1k*9%{vX&Ps7U zwh0DDhYg4+SZmLCRM0x7@ID(?C~KH~4kI-v6QywV8}00}Nrz_*Rxvvdmg#{tf z$>lCQPGuiYD+TUOdG{jE6PGoE)Y28oQRDmGjL(QkT7y$zyMx9*y#r^-oJSq6Ear@U z?0`YKX06S+2BlE%pkY#PC-J2oA@3VrPIb-Gv?AGBGxfl;@H{&e3hodtVcnPf3f^C= z-+v?SC^3&3sR3EWY(6_$YyG3zz+>a}TvYWP(W$>hXaGMQKm|a6pG@@wW7+y*3Rd7a zjY40pv^whApLQ=Rp{Qo2-N{l>7bt3{kHYV1x%5q*=1VbGd&eQF$aA4X-ws1^HzIXd`E5PEvLJtJB!fHOD$cvnaJhXH4Tf;z2A2MwD zzBiV70avT^cqXDT-@A?EWMG$O-W%K+8e6;=&n=j><#M6tZ;Sep0IK=`;Q2x?09~(ltfA#Zc(al#IcUbwmx{_ zL)KgP1>B8T|5R;q8gP_dlqgZ6@I8G0=0&TpCF!u@G4J5*%<7zJl9|*oVK&vAK_W%s;O>$AIq~(NQ-|}k(B+`FGlx_$}`^f8d)%Iw~zHj zC!BiPycBXQ6|R6v_XYfB;T$f;IoM**A6(55@t=*lBXq(OKAR+Wi7zQmdOv%sVsw9_ z1|9j1HUw9FKiGxoeXOmDi(-vcxY3ZUY-@>GAB%7WzoV$E(M9j^`_kivg_KWTfe+sx z{iT#lD6>t2N5F^J1;HI%2i}Rl>)>ezx_TYxH4?r#NXH{2kS?>p^kYKwialAbuXw)7 zFmxf}vBM-J7$g`?oSFFnSaI-rxSmJ6rj}o$;(8A%>+a8dzt-$5#xs@Z8#yPv9F$%H z{!oh9XXtti#dPtXN6HIj&S30bN?g+!QusFND}!Fcg5p|L&G;-)=lqjMs$WL6(Nmcz zLsW}OP2-N21bvg#R!DM6f0p4u~eX=4DQd>%B<1Lo^SW8Lb z)Qy5@1UG~%KD=S5s$rLKY`5j%Uu`WJSZ?HYyY7;{(KCDaiZy1qU~wwGDl|V_*UV|SsrU1_dRp|M*J9;u226_AC1-558dX^Fo|o(g#|$s$PS)5 zlD`{f_WjR*i{GPg_(|{!H(CPcZ!#}n*?NYQrOUCi*{&H$T6Ia0a(O0}U=ikpuXblp z5OwAHp(eb(p=kCls$?RFRw3&m6O1WZyy$&j`%~_57l)DA=O@WfMaDXAA)0T}cBNHr z+Ci7+2o zrotc3H&jHJ6@_{tAaoybOd_CWa6deNqr+7vRb37Tf%G;=KVKr z!@x!6%#TOalNNfUnJM!CSV6rZ(0Af3aFKwp#DPdjfot2D62U z8hTD}CtY;QH7Lzg$>Q1vA>mdbmMT#$!%3$y#(#z75lrrrvL}Joc?$N!ErGk>x>Q03I&?Oz?IM6fBK+7ib4l(bQOOZD+QH*`Gqw|f}AZ3+lImKu0y z^5Q~}>-dE^8P~LS5zm4e>OKTEw&KrP_IW$iZgZf<=d(g`XO6)fC2UF7lL8{Fdr70 zY-j}aqUCe?&apBzMI7LG68gOj9M=_2_bNy)WEEP1-@{qWahvV-pYI>RhOG(1f{g|j zRTg6f7OT=R!11AQA9qWnL1RMnryp8>U={bkkFknP{SC=Tbu6p{0m?_~xRihzs!D$M0?9tp-Lfy?7T z_U!{!8pqa;v#~U%MtQs$O8W87VjWc-j}_Dn3UnUad|Z{H2EYyh^`=kzf%(_+@0?a8 zOycGQ3AYE=F{11e!pfrw>$hkvlgWtst@GF@cOLIKN;<*C-RLv&%K*HS7^poCr=W*zfV8obxP`UM z3m4bpM{WWaU_V`Toiy#fBeS~L!%=-jBxrTI()^RbmVaEthS{+pYo6J;r0xJU1KbJ! z?}(&^87l`_a2|asq)E`h78$*sFf7;wCJIJ~zuRa!Zlk|H2jU>5+*@@gS{qq3VcdZt zISQD<^KBV+c0UeTtLWasCLZ*@X}Ee`D$U2OKMX96dtp*~2qv--V(}Iew}{x>^<@`` z$SJVXvS!v!VHRbU>i&*$=$yskn1s{*CzFB!(F=2zm-I)xA5i$u3U|37B{B&q4C{I7 zBgiJL@pPNA=yTXifioV}Hz&)#fx#uxz;ZO1$|O!m31d*n6c4Nn`gN(tyC7E_@%H{nI z_Z#9bch_EZI|)=VjCT*an;^(<2PAL3TCf*HEZh+7E66|9`gO}BN>TEPL3%$K`EYUw zVS;PX1f~O|0slPSUrmGe6KW{~!<;ls{<|}Q+Ro1#J|w(#?a5&$qM-aN83U+OA-$RT zcb|j*Jp+CD1Q@=cCO@cVvrecUg+cKgXZi>$6b}lS28VZ`hNoDBRN}sNvX}NKMgf47 zDz_J@iCB+`FuEOQnFn$8SZ(59i9*5qJ<(Sr8rRhbG{Wy{i#_doleSdE(}D?2@E&36 z7O$u&3+W4UiOp(trgHd3xY$Z{#mXUccyTmY4Uj*)HiS+T)UTKL1DZq7BHnzqM`OLd zdquRYq%(rg)j)aaf}taytYpG8_%lg&rEX6)a*y*A70WpUWxI)^6LKj|qMj%xqAas7v=%t}ve1w2q+Ha$71}(Sv<1kO(o&+nRq(-u>mi~y6pTa%p%zFauL^1vkp!h7OW*^+*oWU1x zj!f_jF(#HHiPC0j)@nwlR=|$dfL5Y-ISywbYC5CVK% z@Z6>y9(1c*KbtIuP$J;DM??u0hCIH|D{x*ErjRUm{|UM~r#iLUCqJ?LkpS+N5vuXu zNQ65~_;#$GR_?Ib7-ePnvr7i>gf)ge@XWluF)wI8%i$Lw2^STi!%E<3lw_eqA+cNU z$c56o-Bl!836K1YPv4;J^(fPsbfq?>D!U8)onRMGhA*5vCNa0*08H>!ShB05>K7=c z^g1Y;aJS_UzWNsUI(qP{M$tm>#QaeSfw!WGF@@UlpyruJ;P-@59Y+StJ0hHRj+~BS z>2xk>exsB`0}j0tmF3xy9<=P)DT5X`D8w6^&o`fE#F{3H3)ElMhadR>$G8b7Xx#F) z|7I4Eq+Lw?DL~FxV4O9&Q#pZ!=a<@L;aBMP8o8di6c1;;_n8Lhmc? zC|fwplWXz;Z98F|nT`dkY{_Ib3RrjtVf?!Nb8?M0PPy&f>hfupp%097lRY&dWT6sB z=C5xVck7si^1{{x={_16vEtFGJ8?4Ux<0w1-D_ujbkc4lPs+_HJBS&Q4F=yGrtUdA zG6O9NEB#jV3S+cW2wlu3sFEc~Wt^MDdvEy;nc0*c^#aPx%nXJlhB;dl4P?g}mvS+1 z5omDeoswH1C3E3TbI{C(!XXu-Y3YW{04fKuA5HJ|zX;)Q51->X1UhlQ((o+wA@*P~ zjuIm2No!o!>!VrB+)m%$iNWHrSW&_STpDYyOfo1I1x`+z$pg+g8%)!D&y&SLf2g@+ zC!5hzOuW$KNHrSxMA9QKam?^G`@RGEftP(sGDmocB~J9cr8e7?mt7*G4N8nfKzgr& zvxd}zbzgu(z;~N_e-QahA0?SUQ|D}GZde{0%GSkcuOjnfCrwZr^nT86d8K+SA^e(z>AMClK`fpi&)8{M`3WJFP7 z-9*x&EJpO2{iD(RcOaX4^${4aK%aL{j!WlD532dJ@wtdOsJ|D)2*Tmsf|X@xlzeg* zIdS3kIMUsi+=K^Ad%UIppy+LfOj$2$A?`*6y4nd~0a6r9xpy(ty4-WD*#3ql0$#Jf zK92gHPPLpk(x=OyZ{U_j4(TK;9!Sf3aCOpRwP5SG9tD=G7NFzJ0F*d3(JR=oWcPE? z`#D`810sU{^Dn@|U!EUMK*+R>v@+u-u7*SnaF-_G zMSrJ0@O;i7I$UF%i)A6Z^_Mx!*!%l8Auh(}@s6D7L6hat`1k1c04UyPVoM-PPcJj7 z%MHRWdFuG6mGTu;$A+^Bi@};##mJw>Ot^t0*G;15;Sc&DaY@>0AroYZz2u^2qDq+W zU4-``Hatu$!&+Vl~3Z{;GPc)t!gB7fXe1sUs zeT`lI#AU^>YPx(_pIB)s^;>qUiuCP)klxBcZ#q&u3;oPFVRfhcKl}Z(!T6W%t)jw9 zDE)XS3m+H~q;ZoOlcOe-39ztG`7-<(Gy@4Kao#DqymlLJkd%w$-rTVa@#&TL$|3_C zy>%M?SL1RVTR7<7P~#cnS>{t{zuxZodCAgpiQ|69>SK}lPJhC@q?M^BQ&f=pe#-2`` zU`Tod`o7GY;Oi2KKfk`~GDjw7_G20vf6o_w3|n<(v-8>+Kk&}8oe_XYqZ1)G#w_Zr z{~f?KSC@K`6D3F5aRq4-K757#Iv+M)zI+>T{6l1|fchyH@wR$U2Iz?;yMfezyOg(oHyCS;fh)GuBuBCmFM+UD`YGoN3DqRhR`SY+iX z5mU~_LuiTkQdLWa6!?vwIK5=WR$8hwLyzfOzg`5c3Fl_ z^kI&O8JeasY&yPo9}wtA!If+ZB7|;Qr6K0?p!ma08W-C!(dpxh>-|J^*?)q}|LowR zNNRxRo8q9lOa&;9rkvL zbsI~et7JXkGQf!A(9u1`*imiK1Ckjus6nzn_#3nh!Q&F7qD~TFHA;_uX$SLIBUaQl zibDd|rrW?PH5y4prF_$a_@$1gr4;XzMrS5lL#w+~K898=Iv&h}G4VV- zCmD7#VLgYJXUJy5Me@c5iHyR*Rz672Qusy=wL=ujp<(VH_zGz7ojC)Z8iA#NR8mW8 zDyB6gO*P{s`J1#Ccgp*cGSptMOsElha|{h=+uxh5C-6J9_ZUzdvl!o@rloRKi>+d1 zW#{&JA;`}f4LYvvYurcY`Q;|D&?v<5uocbc=*on_6u6zoO>~&K7|V_sbEVh6jmN%4 zOXD@teU)obe)oE(WTNkm;meUluck>=re7*g_N6#31qZ&ObViJswv<@vsaKu7%Ze!o zL#t6f?lHX05_!i9&-&oUV;C|nc|@)C<LQXrX>K9nQOw*T@@%28Rqo$(m2E8XTP27ZSzbNch^O3@4*p{*B68iKVB102mG@;} zB0eQjv&n~MclV`8rcix^Gf_(XYlGnX3DYQaGL)hEnfEnkc6?y3JjZy+qu3VG12N4n zAOZaY49k>YfNIV=UAehC#(&wILd1F0NEDM{>LG0k(y0*AMIFCK{Np8u*Jn}5({fn? zexO(e=mtF#{3^ZOhiGaTS(o`OOYzWE$I@YE}aqoA4 zFQ9z`wd}s_epIM%i1W}=8f)G+%fWN5cwNK$>m%=RK9dP_iZ$yqzxIVgM59!+Md;hR z$VI`B+7pEhNqBLOAHvY=`N|*)TBR7uN&V04?cSs5kvR`eERpnvN^81B0#r z&Lr3qN9v+B>vgn6yI{v|#5+SE3?U+E+$+w&~^ZIj_+M zTZHzu(K!=XmK~VXGVHD#3+VEgh;ADs;Q@x_doFBkx87Q1yo6M?UT^Vm^WajcT*m*n z0KXrAeu4czqTVvB%C7C&M!Jzky1P?KK)O4nmF{jSk?v0E?rsq2ZV-^}29Z$Wo9nvY zXZ!x^CM?%E&tr~bjC~~c>OUP##>itKN3B`eub_srmm=cv%tNDo6L^KC{pFy`XdWF- z>Rjhl9_n{F=^3<3`};PpBAU|cOc^-eYw``BNPb75VfeU*?ETcV;LhHH1}sBC1P*Gy zGh*|Uqk`Yciji3+$>|dFxPQ~jMtm4DRLFxPcEIcI3BVWr0*K=U@K^>Sh9y&QDy3v( z+8DO+j*4{T`92yUWBf!%j)SbIvB~D~=anX#(+(<G@D=LKYrZ8 zTEcCpB*c9l&BPh7k^hs8_LI4n6YgwrrO5`Qc$`ZEYBN-SlRfAM59e*uKPf~q=+}UAc+>v5hj<}%wVcl?!0x%Z2w}aP!ipGVJF7K z%%Rp#O@Y1jgZYnXu5Hi1x<9TKE1oDHdz(h?SLOK%CkVdy!oEcEe@rs?tZA~lL8JBr zVTKmR`)~u?=P@3Y7!H?u`kiSq^^~HVJ?+Vaw6355X@ce;t1p`Tj*b7to9l^BQ z@H)Iy48Pl&=B!hw?T`R0@NIJ`EOZnbGAwym)HPixgBC{)%@2tbSagmd!>XnQ)P|gdnN*Q%qQJdqR_-fRWh)aHLFmelz z?Sx&i9f8Ya2;d@*QqrQU!IB9P?~JrbIepN!bb{r-RSNDfi(MH#hRImcD0yE9(t{{KhDZchdI^@5HvLv z0yKS@S`+vk_4p}xxviI9XSobSB**cw%k4FWm9uxQsd>W&!OC1fY!{Tsb_W3cK&~A| z=VBN`^AU&g6B>2muPb zlX(ug=)D~|rPg8;WX#yfoU;&rD>jhTQ+`_D8u|0+vO2gY7wh1^&2akFzUfxqJA;r= z^g}F7DO+IVTd^L2DMyix%iOOu9*rvsJcmX4avu%&KCRug;cXJ33cO)e^xE_yJDlKp z<6CRXz2ubK1qmSABUHoJs7YXJuWc#$f;(?+0$BWc z-E=d>8+c^ltQ(&O@~X*>6-b5szsN8kX3;5SA#!A#_m`3HiFHR6jR#fRx=d?^LZisC za6C)8OaO2t&@e9+t5$*QyWl>dYIMVlzIl6JG-7*a52Wn=LYkaF$_tP}Vr(fU7#jJS z$}Jz9PsKGcoU8D${ST4u&Q>?d%}xMnXsJw{tvm5U)=W0?XEW!)^n!$0eY$$xm~)v@ zW0zRFA5E%eS**$@Y9_^j5d!Qk?wi{`G&XzMdJ^BJb17KZdM?8*c2`-){l&M z|0y3?5iJ$R_|K%C2XeUSAd5b`+!+1_yNsL4NO9d>f@{Uox+GVD%ujIg5~S=y;kVaf zn=PnAowR9xz}nkrU?I-G39u9d;rVXAfA3))fEWuYBlLXddN>U*K%!_tU5s<|0cD;z z!}`E=&v$sfO)!?qHe^qz(Jez9emPnippG)O%US_&mD3>RNJAY6bp`KB=$bE{@ zgxXBnZ2Qw0sCcHaqBQNycVB$@4IK7su`f#`i)L)PCI?#(3B zBf;v#A0b3kAp$iqyF$4H&EuVun|efJ0b@GEb_j3B2m~B%#?st#`V6WkK5^mUv1u-j z$nMbJq9OIgE>r@>Xvl_HDd}O-2aM}Q?0p3T4|(!k_QwNJ z{{jod>#6TwD4^eC02PC%Zk`erDF}x*CznyT!<|K=8>H=EFTe$D39uMhyKdC_w+$4n z-QMlvnq|WXor~p>^&JAlH^d{z{S1^$QM9(+~fkoti#`T>kv@O0TVHXob>6{;YX*1*Cei+(}6MzKa5}fVO7=B{LUP%k^Y=@ zZ7-+2Xp75r^oXxJ4*U{8jMp)l6ub~(7S!k7ZT-BJF7-A2it}T-p!fSs3MFF^k}>j# zJnO+SSZp|Vu}^CW*?bP`AT_;b{>O>m1yCuhq2C?BE^}u%^zm%!yLrLEe(J^Xs66h^Pw0W|h6TuXB>c|QIOGt- zpEyiUHjr@_f&KboLs{GvtJN?H*n{}2W(%Em2DOd++yIuAW5{aei!%!bQ%1|F0*X{| zH%D||8{94Y+`F@`1rkO-Cb6PYt$g1f1B^yh#}n1m8$5Mya>@<#-uQxRVXYZd6Kc{f zkZ`yzBrP;1e2Y-t;ju>hg572|Xg+7_yo7$sE}-NqSY&4MOS5kI{q7ouGS^6o7Q6LJ z<43;8x>-Fnvlv*-T3-i6ZmXig4E_nrY9nVe^#$}p-xFdXMBK~x!DzzL0{50itJ?DG z`fF{rHap@G8bs>=gE{H-CT=2PpEYtoHl3@e>5eEe2bvS`_Lq>^+OVlr_pgR1Or`qP z#QAjA=g#;OQ9^`nuu0km86(Z@-^_mFs+))wsUTJYmkgqrZ^>ran{G+2E?F7Q8?mhI zKL65q=6U1b^-1a^=>+5FH;v?;`%;|K<@n#`Bc1FT_K4NtX?YGw59Y zkj2+OFUdega3bjs?W_hK<5vQ!alMbI!Ea`F;*(J@4*0C+!@L-RMW!!G-A}jASDH|c zTKNv*aTIfu9BZ_sn20tlV1p}NL@q1lD6kPnG;nd<e|zp~{hUV&7L zv5B=A^~Us18GHw*xcG{TuPBqst>(--UCWaN@J{KvpNO(+UwQ+vmFP9yoN04qrD?t_ zh8#+cZGTpvf2!KQazMTJ`$x!Q|AmE_PhEGqQhWP|{hH+OW|Sd#d2me$1;beY`{{It zGrwCj#+U&436hc1LcTap#RiA;ZhyoF#xZpdoPUvv;Z$`13}zZrsZ$3nXY7K!B#@f{ z&NnL(7`xK#sr0u59|XMI~%p{=A^T#BUcC04NCq<7E3-Q10Z#3+A?$HzdlXU)o7 z)Iu~rMB?}#)$>0F1I}aIj?V=r!f3zhHqJ~`{*HWRN^ccvu-duHx~t|Sn!5}V<#`8A z&~^R?5z4sa%bqCvI|hTx~GPmVMD_ zzaw`&MOmuY{%8>nr{{$t${Uns=2bt#@XW6uyMzIhHD#x5@1p|E-1p8YSw+mBk*R|XuO@ggc?x*5jCEBd!uT3! zEyb68t4;U6=Hc=WiLxuDOS#Tpsif0|FcD$uDO`vU^H{IBZmb(9W*Enp;eQKk_HKJ^ zZqbE=M*pp%=9vu$V)LvlrhHEb3@9va+bkvGrXAcFPx7 z8%fy4Bb}N+!!*m{mhDhRpwUc^%zLAQ8};9zF!n#@2L9Uqog9Vdd9u)DRT1?;xAW5z za&%#oeFUO_6CA^AC+9BL;Y}xH*xOLg1@N`(*X1w)*euvPjB*S%!abj~`eL|=1t zjjsikRHDtev?O#cgb}Z?9mY_m>h$14uG)jt!=X3iduGB7GX-wA&p93ANAzQM3A<7w z(&XfmW#WdnK^A3QryS+f1F--wTKN1Hbzl}5H8qdGKq(nA5O=2mw2 zHsSnQo65*{pNldLRF;|%%JZDoC#9;6WDOiLKl_zJSzDinLm1Lf){KNtB-)edZZY}H z_TIb0d54!dv@EM<>TVb$Z*^)Y5NqF+!!;w@?pvkSqxLC?&oN>bF$$=aA1_wa$Q=_i zEL@!j@M48|z8yG|SV@eH;+oai*m{6)X8<63duRaPC@P!0mbMy$;774PRbVU5;$)f6 z@ny0L8`RTz6*`?;*%oc~h_g{8x6_x;z-AHjZ4A2zd8Q>5E$7#!gDp7-=H&r*DnW!Z zRA^7bLvzQUov&K~MgZOn$oe%M=K`#omW~hHY4XBT0iGqef-@{g=GDu4DX#Zh@?68) ze+4LZT~7Dy-SU-g`F?&a`i|i!DvBol-&4P!+^6t=S^%M8xLC>ITBj=qm009rds&ec zRK6+tiq#H$0jm`66r$}2wzG%!9@$=W0@qZ?S`F2BzV)|0eX|tasi*-B18} zw7{nox`I2;N00*71in4s?Vm1?#z4+4X2kvS1_N|mR|3Bcj))Rib^jc=jPXUW(u|1; z9{tInQ-_>%J?1O#w8o68nqe>X76h)B?)muWx2^Rl3f?PVgc4JfouIi)Gk>br}o_ML8eVk<}>>oeqCXIGf!?g z>3(rC-H$#!$sr2__8h<_kNJ*N?=i|yA~8aPo}G2A!jN2#4qXaOug?316+6uolD-9g zExKBDTgEo2iwHOp6cM0k{s-2ANMSe7s-Pbfl*x2xmx2S&+Sm@JoPGQ?Rr1t=IaSTdWBqc)eQu*#I4WuR+BRA>s8}|B}V%XZjJXs2| z4Z|d^gaW%DQP2e}FTiqs4S29K!tPDT?>YgC9%L1eR*Y9D=8n3%$FW}>drI%w2k!k! z->ch_a3gFpaV8=B))zAc?eaDq-l3w0>iUB?el=<;W)qnH08pz72nJxM=ngLY<0rU0 z>VHDjOwJ+xJWoI&kd7h{Q&-sQa2EbzN&@-gf5EasqX9K8sgDx+FG^3wv!U?qi$506kw1b=xA1%qgmEPD z0#;eT8YJ@o8tNt8hb{ZQAmt8i4yL$e=?ytYvN$F!Q{Tmq<@wI2u8!f_Mz{LAG9-k{ zjY{VO5+<&Ih9Bu^DrWzzS^PA%&XC9Ur4BN(^=ShJ(Qu<(-q zE)#vxq<$y1s4$_XTT7Ypoz9u@Z@!}@ao?i;v|ib5I@NXi_vx>~EPVJ5c+Q?v0*pwa z?9skoo69)pVL$?WSzff(OPA{oL@AzW?qnAPJwB%TN*h zZr=z0$07gm3?7sz5O?)0&9)d%Gr^sj<&qvbvTu5}Is(VI%9QWcj(Fdf6Qco8OndB{F`ex6bTH z#;{++`7R3WUFG!$o&5~By-F+9e4!}D@Jktt{rWj+ITyotITvQ(e7j0DblW2old-T6 zC%2cUyWklEAfk}>a$EMe94JjnB>R`7%Ex_hKGJWIirPCPnH2Om_0k4P^z&13Mk?(P zonpof;GdZQg$~zBxqm=EQ6&Df=W(pZxS|3ah4iR|(lqKA6+=W0otVjYP|zgv!ho8d zw)yR0++vrB%BI*OFOg@?Z=fdauI=`LGT~+}|E=V$g8OgHz!Pyuv4H4*!wBK>iU&W| zGIaNJ+}8&rzCCu>^(LEC?XO?c%)-&5!q~X`8OA~>65r$1e|Mk_yWEArLmK)4+})H6 zV^_?EZMc}w zi%JKHz8Qkl4mjoau)c`Fq?GAwb;X(ts+aZ%{ zuu0a}S(otyS{&1DVMTsEtOOW_=;I?f&F@-c_TIKvx=aq=G|nl3m?r&AOTIKqIh77n zWjn~AC4|vKdGeT(b!E)ZrWB%{myi0u!UW^F9Dt*3z+Mkbf0ZrtUt2C84LyelEJ|0Y zWJaAyq#dP4PJ%vz$1qF9UhVO;UG;Em;<4ZHk5q|Ix-Z~m)=B=y%LGJ$kFUy6K$jtn z@+FePS}TYD?_j%G-dD*fujjh3_$37H+G3u%y_Hod{W`IDvV|=0MrS@qU191nG2|uP zTv&Ih)wNPI-^sN=(U{q+qNnT5-8L9>+NeQ;=E*k6^@g}Y%W89FIWh?rT z-nm&3kj@5HjV&K-EX=a$y0zq|Eg4l6-j8nksGgoDOi-@U$UwF_-XJ3l={UMw1u?Un zm#8eJrrBDVT@Y#W21h%1UtK}6e!1Nm-6-?APZ^;cE^CLS+F#1MsU)u@y!vM){SI%4^dpRbCM*GH6K6!aay&y35D@_Rs$Qhdxqv9qmfKDmVt#AkrrguH!6sEpc2o6n(Wnn9JjZ{pitm<02 z4#5GP!Xtfe^b{|1J^UBF=efaj{<3b1mutugD*OoWg91D?GABG|4e^G^n>b@oPTaAK zpJ@8qv=4+h-+>YRAvKmg@lf6`7~NK1Ze z0}cHy9g%Pogz%8Dpyb%Ak;m3-dAE|G>RnVPOSGM1O?fgN3}R7RB1YSe4saPp*Ir_X z(YQ?7zceM(A6wQ7Y7%@Y@|0{jJmh&#B)}hh)}27=6i)oj2kz(a!8m`_hGxE@%bwm= zzWq;`TY>;)zrE4qSm9d&OKMj^?)&i$e>EsvhkD0?S5p+&FW{W{V*CV>%U5JCS7a2v zkr@MOz2)VvBIcWHmi%At{6)an3<<;q9*E)sV=+c#UG=a>w;l~_?`jm|zDTMY3fa`AIdJ?zD*UTNx*f+ZKqmhhdPuy+eVdMmf;>XbYeuK)DtBxr2y% z7Lw5Zr&uu)p5_pU@xTM`vsgWO1S96D3WbVLnDepo3JvZQF3+4UD~{`K0tRtkOyzjm zvo~$w0FUSai;Y=@EK}+q$`{lg5M2J4`sr$WfIr3{0-AW_$lrxD&;^!+NSmCUoN?F{ zylep7Z-dNh7n8jU2*UD(f36Pa|MHjwA+ypD?0UE)29ajf9t4n5PEAPX;pO zcQLBMXdlp%lpO}?Utetimwc&mo=V6uJWlFeq5*&AQSgH3U`T1Z=|BWnar=O5wX~;N zn6=HfVRli!5t`J1I>_9a^VW$n44XTDT1+*7H`KCCwJ13P>&M50)Jg61;yQ-BxuhQO zj{k^{@GzM1$1K!&_M?9TS;WW2*D3QD6EISI$HF* zQsym zY|bwaal_24ESOn{QbydUCYMlCSjGM>UK;~|Nbeg%-U``CqOa5HC}a=US*)O#izAd?Ga%$ zv#bL;7zxQz9!ZNlk6!1yf!+&{fsx+l&-v2}c*NBaP(7bR@Sl%f ze4oF-(~X1I!rcDE)VsS=K(${0YZl10<_Q>zJ%J%ONC)Buf?V5@7}P<7wxIPqy^shb z1riNyA616{cM4*@q5&L)S6{T*HQI6$e@~#`ccQu3pP#yPd4pC)cbG<8BK?Evpx|^e zA;(&S)n-th1#S1EN5%H|9!oCC|Ki75)b!U17PdE$sAD?EI=#XULH>DjQeBWA!|zXp zk?_NAqLpH;0w+Vo6L6#d9uj$W0y9#UI^gx+gDRjI{pI2N!-7}>f+JA$F>t7kb;=nz z)X&j51FlOaMnEuNz5UHRHf8c115!c+kwjj{MUY3%D-^2gpCAp$9XeWaBD8OSOfvYo zxdW_k@e!K?oBH_+q)z+jfoS7i3jBMLv(aiXmD(^m{jyM(wJB}Cshqh}X1p12(^E`6mdT#j?m)pUG&85oR^$>VSZI9wP+@AAzm z7JuW9zZ@25`up!+fIs@H(+nld>5fzw1Q?u;ic)Lz{)nX}DjiSfQCZIv%3|NZHPf+= z1Jng1BlZHhK!V%W9VquGa25K1GQjp0_t_8pH6Y!D(j9h0)EbrjsLmFwi&v@n+(o~H z1$vkN5%F5%Y{at$*0-4b#si;_#?{Z2A4nSGo?J1rIQfD+;^l-;IWr-69^fqi=)1o` z#@{>5Co+Tqnj0t)K>{A&1S-Y14rGKh11$52x#Hl~ ziG~9@PV82w+=!WHXV5JM5fg;`royv?_91=xLF**$x>pP)k9wmSI7QptM5|eIgdV=Y z6SSzLrS9sLG;&)sF?ry5v)#XA`@s}ypMGSqtMk!>bXV%mWOvQ`qzWP^UT*!MQQ*}+ zfS&-)V}9GwNAPx;{5j_yfEMz>z739uxKS#{iL^hfK?bkg2sH=XNy1N;I;}sL{{v(W zSPjY`+(R%t!)IH;W%LEwTqQ7~)KS`$rR}yQ<10E9B018|;D)nvDl|*Ivk^`x6T%tO zN%0)T&M_RLwCYn&!azFhI%A;2{negI?QS%;LS3c123vG#rP?^PT9|IEhto37T)WWb z?5&jy#|6h;3JQ{(fEEcR!b5P+PI}AAX-EDcI(!m(DFfU%fNx!$U18=0C&7&;K%pMc z3jhuC9+D5i3i1Yb&Iwm-s%GE0s71?-rVrVl@s|XMGgW!tT;g06QHgrwp}^s0aeN#E zj-K4yvAR)pr8nRfqO%8HUEh(X#Yz!flS@f-=*!{d6bf{wF@j-&St%)9?~RiI59NHl z%4R6$449j_oOh>R!Tgh&!K^x7mSnqr$1aEd`7;2{egouE1K9b^Q z15C&Fl@Qp}+!yKdh9ergH;|qyAXfLb*L{BS{(S~&0-hmtX<(+{5~h#_`-|~H9VJ-! z?9brM(fxGhaCf{AnKHG8Yp8~eKe0X)-J(02!GZQ>BC~lm<6E2UupY%X(j{b9@b?M1 z--_Xy!x2)vS^l>eg!`5VbaFk8pb~F!{jc!+bgHW9huw2z4YT{SL+6zg5-J)z4%Oqt z)NgP=k+bO`ZD-2i7rf?}Q2&%f6i2IQnF05Mk7yR-$xi1z=_gDXy0`|08hO@xY}pyJ zNKL4}Lj6pUhnx)i_Ru3itKwy5qmjGDGK>)heCcgm_=W^rT?wy+#0dFQ6R(KjHcbo~ z#w$BMl+#~D+cwvR#fCwbVHVZf3Kr~9bY})W1S{!NY`5|TUdbhJ4w$X$?~#TsP|3i; zxi?Xsu5r=`HFM1dlA{d%0e97C5!`-OA`y=$Sf7G zpUK~=H)E>hnJ$&PpJr4LHkI42(*1)L8rzr!F9@>rdoGnu%&+WG#AX$y4^*GxBTnM&xIVdS9Q0fz(?aj=g_c;#l?bEOMsHO zJ&4)Hju9chzqL9&QrDA^m@^xO1OMv9N-nNX+rVQ~)fYvZP&y}Zz>CRJ0HGOK!68w# zI6`(;TO;rke>X0O&8}y!Q}Z-z-r-V>jR!!5_;_ zkAZ|rAo1BwubUn>P&NkC+n6s2Y#t+8i@t7zUsF>GN*^~Da@7uxBnQca__5!rp$LG$Swhny9g=$leHd>{jhhcgzoM`2@Yw)dM5Bq0KMrgG|6kn@m#K0 zQ6}+&eL1=$nMznH7^@m;xZlZbMJyCvij$ccN2}AOdFx!u3KLlS1X4OSNzSM`{EjE| zG|D@4`4%p7SIxE8Byo|m9*0yLc-^}A+4)?qiE6U3rAc%9Z|w4;&@d4*z>}d5R;7Rd z(EB+=y{*xR+DZzt_rl-+lKOLF+13(V)^io9%tc}-XrZS8>px|&h>-PSpxEIUHaSVn z+Zq1!c9hO;iQ&Z8@HUc0`VK<`VWv&r1Gp2hkmn`1Qvq@=9LsC7yM%s<2BkK1V<)0? zEfv{78F3Wp<4j`KiHS9mRgdirt*VtcpF#9Md5vw-FRJ86| zuC8b{rYB_}5+7hDPC)7C-iXC@PDx%s31EYx{NKM}dXKq1_Zu${`TnGrA z#*V<7$FeKHspwp{BYZZuj^AqGpERh5z4I3pVcbd+xZB@8c~}xhb{_y>PYG<^rGyM(9bG^IS zz=mjm5<+|5K`t&l?^YW^7eg-<2wRpD^#iPg2*~{ePz%7QMpUR~O))Fv9#N0e^Ud#8 z_qB{A^GFH{kBkOKvVmp*)&n5n{RVw-7i(?U?{BmCT_)e|pstrTPKsy?c%~7XrHS}I zgUH^@H8}xbx-yOMIoQ;}X|krZ*F1h6H*hiIv+~n8snDSLgL!1C;MiqFyD$^aXlW|} zU%7gXE1kf;5+S5G7Kt3QqSxh{-ch6i{jmk{_a10idIW?TL9qCp-c(l>)=WWkK+dml z<$aeVmyvxtp116Km=_AUtqoX!2)pYBO{x`Fb5?}6q3$%#zOg)5jqp(Y_v@o+vT#eJ zoHaG>fowZ(3^vz6a0QZHM1*HM)Tn=RK-t*zcSfQNu0n1KvL=fXet0 z;}AR#XVZBJDcl=Dk-f!%Ws zUS~_Z+8L97|Au`Cj2)3xl+*JNc*e{!T2eO+u ztMPoO^tfpw9F`VGNN!kVD`o#h8gNMHVk88w$Ny1dntM`9BCBBh8pDerRB^cTZRB48 z+J46(6W`#kkm0}T|CE~ljj1PN_h(Q3{Asn(v>IN# zWzL1KoWA#=#4&EkCw*py$r(?&Rizy2L~cqdUR7X#@-t|6yOB~2Mo+pv+LTVCgh!Ohha?_c^?%)Qr_TuO=ovITT93^;uHm`5V{=88y48l_CEW(7VZ!Y9Ez0IWo;fZB8JE~8dbBO&#BUKYV+j*y$$FLq+CsBn zWp7_yn;wrcCBdv@vre=Ls)eGHNjD9T2yu0HlO$<0JT^TX^_b~vmJ=LGwEhJ@~T_%?_PTDkna zx!C6m75FD(9UTN`#(m5}*^(4SNe!}zv^Og>>hKlB9&?|d+R+;)-dJd=E7hc7 zJakRR)KJ+U)VWOPf1>pkrgbct>gXNK#%yuXtPiBos{g4tJ|O(`oy}8r;xd=?^=ooO z7f$lruR)ZApQs|?u73BheU+cOJJ6BPi1K$YQNMj1(%iEMh( z?V7np9c=iez(x`K_bP=(NHt&}Il@0?%wE?sr(HBbr%>WqefYv-WTt#D2;MX}3 zNm{26GP1nfV1e2Tc1Q&-r*6!K(Z#KS7n=;tQ9@2|pbV z^6B3hhG>#?^AC;H@L+Fjlr-qXRNyG^?nl<`x0LSp4P-)|qD&qBvH{68RqQ{1UG=_U z^zp@;zA&WO0za+HY~_KBkro|_K8L=x0)exDB*u|JwnnFw<=MR>L(1I0lp3mLBtLbo zsA*Ns2SE7037cuKP%ia?aGB{pk2uR?)l8}-fW-hOkM7F@3`U!6JFZwDO(&9&g$0t% zN~_D+0W%C;Q!AhLh<5mfO3RxWMefXl6l>7AWk{xRi20fA(^F~zvFDz3118p#{G4zL zkh+MOV9_8JNVvTKpxPbv`_q1}va#*$P^I7Iwp-EQ=j85Xir*hf>r?3>7`@^TG@h2X z{5GMSH2SN#Btmo-!)t&zPp@&dq%|NyfTQS5-T&Ek!~3Ufs1wwfg(xGEy*gE;MhE(>~FmQ$C1g=X`))V{tiw7KcIvSA3}hz ziBsb!vf(h)*!io{?#7dyXqM5h8`Y|TrChe^Qa`0C5sp}IT{%2Ly1-MB z>+TJvq;Fw5&p=Nn`zap5M71w^=%qx=pibQ<)-<D7&AAEa|BZo7U@3jPSiz+Y$eDhf9enkY5xngFhrS864wAyRg*$QW&HV6X+I z9wAS}q+Y-m)~Wx56iY7G@Y-r2iK8qE{>!=*@DdsK0L_e)Wo4r~9%rEi@8o9J;kKW{{OSd>KGYp0Yp+ynmvBf8|FQCF3z_L=kH^Nl z-3(^7x+`@^Fd(#XVL2I%(2Zm!t+vJ2Ef76SVi#!^5|=Q}YB|@?@{^Nqru{c7>V7(t_9M^?{7oV^XL#N|K_NasNcxPZ4(wE*-3f^g0U8e|tft(9;4co2pj zr0;`!vIGoUpxr z{$MK0%Bo{!nm77bvmKW8BDX6-a@8X+;@@UkR*D{Na@A8#AZovJcpp&BX!~eES7A+| z<6OfyOWlZTl?8tCfE}1Eba2p!iZWUk)7z5V20J^0wLVA!4LPhd<-?CR4wS1aMFk56 z?g0Bugm%cEx@k%+Wcr^4$iO&yxYowy4x9T*3N93l=oUmzAqbG%8Vx6#p@_tFsP~`IAz@@Wg`A0-Ac{L3m^Q>|ipUL1UMqZSXk2|xu z{xnYhsno-)jua*Q`H%8daD6ib+UT}4ZL0S$2s!_4`Dcz{I~1<+9%v-{w#Z(}vkoAFj&yucjD^`^u_6J3c346So{(~}&_xnihL~Z5Hj0=%f9-< zU>xN)nkxE%{umEbAI+r2X-=Z)gkh1-xD5LnxneL$F5u=MO=6$tvh$3)F>u7q!#2^# z4(D3*;i>b5`JFy`=_7+nqvE!I!SXFz`3AtWpTiZV6Af>=u^!Akq!e{V%?LXXKa3}& zH(mBQV_Gb7Fq)GV{YmA&qS3{Ut27V#KP{kmB!J$K<5LKSjY)Gj@K!5-sueel**yu3a*^ugJz` zXt9p}`jaJwF>c6@>L#sbt{ff}lF~vg^c)#6Z55h~lb@@bG-b)_5_`>uFM166iGG9e zC?9q6Jpq)fTHoa`+(H&mH^4f^@>Vyk;StJ@F*MA4RC&8sF-oRi%G8JnyV9s_hw;;=vSB2rT%f58S3nT^!6N*|H`=tuQ*N$H55b#QeUkN*c3ye*dtK z7mS*3p4@DfNcmj}n0xHA+g(w$=&;S;jnnFlLr3-;9#ccT-Nu3iRO~IR}gXR5qh<+Oy?um=&{&9AW7M#a{ZJf!cZc4R-P083!*R2+npl^bGykokIvA8Wq`SNWmx%ZI{NxHe}1bj z6?^8`FH}jKbgF%YJn@~z2urfp1J}I@c+qP=nepO)-yOrzyzCHRc_LfZtE=0DYv6>8 zVCyJo-8%;7zR116Qyx@HI*wzWL(+>Xhr5ncd^?IO1s_9;1SDs~UaI%;Q#bAbJtIQ2 z22ByMp4}yhEROf}fV`M4V`>hC-%<<9*wNqK-EZ4o3rPpBb7Z~H+5u=|gDEJ?c`BLr za4vzx>YX&)fMN)PBB#e53={pGZBYz;a_U0qvSgvQ3+s8j!utwS)!6LApy$8>2@GaR zK}7c9RS?SOG#@9>kgMFR-{S*4A;5?S?w1C@sW6R;!c!!otkFztFM^0kR;5%}YArxE z`?bOX$rjDl<%_&}VfdsW`!0x}_6w6(2SCE1Kox=bP0GfKv9)KD%Ee5@-miP^ps8%k z6i5gE-KLmIEco#At)-@i2h2-Eq*dfuqDJalEiX*ef|-hQ?AS^zwG?b^Gmt>zm|@;+!^en~00~kH-+sYK4-#h8aD|9{{u8JTP~S zaN3wfQ;ONeh)vE+h7w!(o~PhR4pa;~tyh2i*0OjTowPW{^)UL67;b;`l(j)&0(ok( z3EiWXb^QWPTZA-@1HX>Gjw)`E%4!VLkEDZTTn!Fb2vp|&J4(>tdis+#S)yMfr7;DS z;-LQsjf2sMcp`Pc;dAmb8+p~|=sCQo_)RVBn#5EAnc|Sd%HWI^A6|~Ur@HwcEfpHnwT=!<{uMV~wggCqA#dLgh<0C5 z-#`}+b-#{Le0l`&3t=GfISNHIlgk5YDy@Ww*6vU|QxLJA;z{%G=R<=JB;9rhg1$j;%4d zSa9clI!l+#fig+L?RbG@VrB?28$Vg%Y^B9!rIKG6Z?~^s%&pzJ>&tD0sF7RJ`*(@l zl!;2DVqc}zMXL#4m=?;>TTA4`3S);|XX1afxXG5i%a@P+lqCoA0R#h{hmZ&}8Nl5U zXm2@kZH@BEmMS7zV+jwdyAvJ7PPl55Z>$Bv% zF^N#~>OrwGV$!wxg;vuj`3_9I%l`?)D-q@YilrF%NawB>%nUT<(zQ!8a0`fa3y+v! zQ*sN`J7YC!WmI*)>bT{$fIWateyLJ-uG#Lxa12l{ znG?=7dPM5iL5v?54}ES=k@8WlFoj&eY(0!3()~O8V$FGsWpjj{^#9}Otb?L{->)wS zN(e|xN_TgvbS$-WH%KF$q9EP1q;z+8NOyN5-CcsH&&}sMzvmyv8JrQ=-S>Un=Q`(g z_U%Amsi;8Iif-fK<|u{?=@a=0S*G3*u$E-k yT-6D!)c*PMUGr^uI{)$J=4eb<<^;EMf8cNf?!C?i(C!7C?vYA*)G%w3HDi>^g zN2dK7lShL=P8&`=nXXkhnS)Oe%#8h@XJYCX=;SWfZzIIPU%_fcZ^f_0#zAMop>hI4 z@sqg=6gdCu$#6#&ZFOiwJWK}dkHAfx0yKNz zze7wr1pJrqJ&@5@k9GkjPkqk=>Q4&sFLm*2A3>|4^>qFyhzNUtZD|(DkKe0j9c!Hm zSvoAmY&Hlpo@3wn8PwN6?h858KuPzpBZH2%IQ;DZj%pLQ_AGEbyXeFFs$ip}h0I`J zUDAb;6DkG08Zh1BD3`@9{2oV@mwmi7x*aTq;ZU#>OH?+OwIi-(Z38O`cRZY`E_Rqv zR~Hd9yVo;3ZzINttoE?qAg=Q!Zj9zqQ_DV_Vtv`h>h`(BmN6@u9<-NzdL)0k@DPS_ zA^%KbB$!e%K}|qA5%et$l_IaM_TsCQTXj!Cu(UME-bN=Xd==jY28b8%U!S7-)ryN)hFKyIM?VhvMv#KBt4V{z-X1>x?~B;h~8)49nE715kF{(zZdKS5nOZS7I=}< zpcK*PuN))seu0~$lDz55I!^f7Fkf1vPoNTlY`VG1j7h^~7Zx6tt*B0c*vDMlF7WR~ zU5~KmgFxIf>rtoirVmwPT-=Gec+eC-zPn~QHEWhX9PkIm4c{+0$wJh3CLZ#0HFVwZ zv8o6M)Kq)5_Z?NUXuedI9?ncDYJwXT|9_AE4`$g*k%MY@*(T1Ps)$3yA=GB=v5buj z>}SNiiG`p>V7*9%*5X?h4q`9j;y0A|AfKm0+kQ=GsS^-55;YAOUXMV^4=?%*fhTbE zw?9{P#LAD02>V)awS4$UXDAYN*Z+aymm6RhfTzPZ6i-miHbH(R%QiD9q$PhQj+h|Z zPg9}5zk{=%0p+$x1)yW0efLS6ffS<&bSd22i&^KZU!KXtr3=1#=*-5@Pg>1hw$)!- zb7EDoh9hv-aO?RUo#Wk$yGk?$T#yqJ25$XtR+JGn@P3z3%((j8$V^0%mW+#lpO>4m zQ3QZuCtr`I3suzymn&_$G{2$taVv|4zAM$$y@KWItq-_SPRfUVnQF=|DvRAyXNlQ( zIaQXa+9NN2AHEWe;#nppRb@*KIr~^oPHj_>&|&LZkt%!7StdVa`lnVyU!{X#@|PCx zLlXQ6c^FLNd;}nqoB_95X;2jIDX_rS4P@4k-ZW7%vu`h8?aKS60Und`_@tu9uOe8a zcfm@pv->Hh`^2vW6=C;JYYsN>1l6lF>;&t#=drJLU)``Kor65|lP8@OTyX*8+65zDciXs)ZxHvL=75^G1%?|3kdCA3L=X2<-qhh|Pj=_-OLUA8g znV&S2K{I4I%cWv^I&n#3rY4&xp~)q0C~>dgb@g{RW@zeHa~X6o=ij7HP2^2K)WC^z|psS|#DHP?4tMIvuQ*!4v@_TA^ikK~n z)uC0rjU5>7l-x7}Ox9kq;S_58XSpu?zo{1b#Cl)=N0;V@{=ei|VR5u%&x|oOdJU8W zS|cut=$RjsIn7b9(Z9_wDdNUsoUd?X6`43CUQ0q0rDJhU zFyP8lQCdZ3nZ9M@GScB@H}2+K&^k6G2}z)Eln=0fArX}2HZNk0FsY(2=M1G{ zaA`0l+|G5oTIt;O* z0>7L<$PsA*+`2f>Vzmq@LEe?q;Lo8(3=RXGl@+EA`?jgY!S-#1Ydz04Z%WL&ggk5s zGD*ecaYW*X-Di0EzIY#SYF^1jGkAtA|9t70FdZrekz`H3LTb=*Y!`L6CN}?eAw0g7 z8wiY>fyw9tDL7Wh+1Tzr`ddBgBS5G@+i z59ESRuOwJKoWM#wxD5IUzwf#UHCYNQAm&67gwmviza$(?jD|Y0e1rBV)hHR1N7#LI z5Nd3XRBc`F$?IdlrDT{$I={NDR&}L+9jt~~FQl{ZYNTtpmZL?6 z`Y4dfEFogdM-N^uY7}~W(*_EzE?q$!`O?hopBnvdB=b%1?#qNnl6p!su+TjoJho(B zveWFT2CgX*4P^}c48nO!kE5*q(+RV#_kE?1Mqrl7^k)_`k>I|dj|Bgx1&}4!P%T>a z3p&LAqRSrE;tZvZX!5IACUbO$Ii|N}+fX6S-Fpgc^zDinwI=)&HA;!^wsCrq^JzRR z#~i1osdl3;L94_&VHn39Z{7yGD6AyP%=tE;WcwqncGuffd<=4!->2KtRWFc3eeFt* z=JW-Q(9n)pT0PRFCiY z1FvzerxtK2P9}FavY%(g*?D26!EpVk0yOSjhdCHXsrPWUi`i7R>|Lvl>SZ5RQR9bh zv>1e~M-3JmjQ<@zaw19(xm;&o*?OAIvrv9jO~~QO=-yWSk%Z>bo95z^GWdc3HM+)8 z4eNIr7LPSvR7vQ}OfhOu8#mVW_h3_oRVxQ7xaFSDy;a(qS9pvpD@@WqS|o1l7TFBW z44u4ml_4e4+cw{|kee}N99E(IzP6GvF5S8rqlnSghT9fjdlB2*@WphkbZ{r%VLyzl zMr`^Rh`+Z#ZW6as-VIC)$4(wlKix%-gb5O~{2pqFEqNTK2c8M;m;Wm<9vB4~t#7)o zZVw-GtXJS0sO)Wjxj6SaHxbE*h!E%^F?AWEhr@H%Q5&iF`I4QYz%jv!7I_S0PN9EK z)CU*~TT)wOb)~d%$y?OhDQ%HLa&<-hH1c_7O}X6%1d6@wqP{HBl!p(mFf+eQejoAb z$U6@XMa)I1XlsH`R)|@rsRmo(-*J727OKo^T#+A70IiuyXl;O@yl2!GsH24tQ=J+) z*~>ZP?GPCg_gg;MYi6v(&z-bLKjqh{z6U^}2S_~4Ys>h)xJtz|ZDHq4`#60_>1tbq z|DH8PiIr*h>SUS$XopwX)!Mt6LQ)Y6f-z25J=Tq>%VN8696GFJmM@8U-<-u={O{Ex~4cv7_m_@#{j`tkD{G{B%sX;wl+CTu6a*lJ({$vwARl8#b zG;gH2|3f#uutFjRttK$+|J3iLARCWW#^Z#1!GjBw7&B$~JCDFTR?_&eqKDW7QDlf(oBC zdm<2X62f+~@0q$>!$2t%V}W5IH_xst?ag zg)p@lCpEYt)xhck6&^Fx0rFQa8l!5Pe(xNqj6sNkj|hf^GN_!s5B%tA+WCyMij56s_O zf4)%aN9t!g;u1%WkD_Qsvq%e2nMF0XN-Mw}N{Kj*Z+jKp@7#%t&!VgO?tO=P=Sx(ZH*!RX4**&X`jnAoB$!FxOy#H{YMt8qe z?1u@nM#0g!3l(e5={Qedm_6JSy+k?h`c6}fk~uw>Xsw0xBno|NE$O#LIkDn?1{X z`|(o%Zi8(}jc}WC%9yyXrFIci1XNd6BBJ6=;HaMjR0aUc9~VF~KoVK-h~&cF1&#W5cS39{Y%INdJy}YUxf1dg^eu;wlzR2|;PUC{adH z5;oT2&&Hv)O+xX7r&RZJ%cXu}R!kQbpuwSnYzdg%*jY~cRmKvtA%U}jfU?*Quou8# zWU*9Rlt`?eE5le~#!!`3R($Zt*bimb_{f;#1r4!Y_drm)DGbyd$}$O`VvdGIiAW%J zFjVqls`c`zU$;NFaXta*2><8M2!17nv&+p!c)3HnV%_m=j*sbm)h4y{?^hyM`N=Mb z@%4VpCZZ#Rb@E@2e*02I}sc z`^@&&mAT@uha^m)DxKPeD^JdrkHZC0LgLiO^bZU$3-IbBz2B3T$t?f!SeWoTM)qFv z8$T7VfvC|_LMkw?RvV6l2-g5exS;8h`nFBJMRtmhLu#avLv}SwBBNo5U6Z7j)D3p_ zz=C}d`lEc-I+@ZqwIAUj7?JZOTTW7a*ytC|?`&0ur(bJ{4^s$W`HjX2fiB&taHYE0 z3#yH{0Zk?GQ=V~~$%t<09P}0Z><)`&!iqJ9{^$Bf6GKVw=A0b*cGbm4K%7Dj`}5i? zQ`t^aW>bzGP?8wTxU}Dogt|Mq5vlhI_wrmMpa^er-yD-@kEph$4T{0SU!Hx|_F<*i zGHsM);j5HdF|LUkndwPO5?rDVy;EBvh7L|}*jH5ASZo~_ zyQ^RL*f7x@Xtq7Sp6UsTKRI79`^vBZaL8{4dSeynXgB!(;z9#<vg=LjM@QWvBz3E{u1-eui_7ktK_-uC|PRrxf6cWX2eb zV=vgpWN;i=FfPnY(~D}c(H~Al4PlSH)Mi@(JnCD1S>e}WJG>6*g zT;gI^+Qu;h)fsc3@|V;cLw%EJ@FGEFQszpw<7SM3?UQ>06`O%LEkM0{iU& z{@bXrQ1ABO=oYu_x8WPy=8?Oih@%%B_wB%`ed1&jMqyNRQI9Mz-!hR^Yf1CacJwXO ztEXi(u(at#b5rK&QiIBt500vke6*^zlhJpJb<#q?T3~*+DAN|T23CR0&jp=#{jY~z z^Fnmo!^O~>7YaV<;yS1^j%-sRNr1zeRi(Wg(rJfRk`U%zap z0{({k;kIFP$#ec*o6!5)f6S@OiF zCGji?GtQ2`XBf?6I;8c@V{!{9x@XH6>q@H0CS4vxWM$3s_Z8nthr_d91JLPTkn5dl zakH=ZrO%XG*Cg0+OvbzA2DG3?*t3aF8#9?8i)|qFeFXG?^~YUa_L>Ef@{c4Cs0nqK z=Ay7&fJS@Gn^>Q1V$-}owgPeqhI7BJ6J&RyJ~^Gco0ui#^)A$lKZYOlA#b*Ga9f(g zMvJmgzK$Tmd<2&C(iY$YFw*H%U}@@ZJ38iVY(dGqp^bh{8q8#-$v$g#y8e5Ar%_;uQmpzipR%^>EZHnZVvjN5k{O;T%p@dI@DGM~w0 z(x#EgHw67(&WT+**K~mfLH#)X<*!qz&u)r+**{AH+{>rxVY&aASptxH^dD${v>8}b z2qj+ZC7~vDq$es7;2g>R5oQ|P2@R9NDS4X5AHY=u9v?( zLb-!4VS^rP4vYrNE$8u4+-N&SxuTmSBF71}^s3M&B1?22YS^r`-hYLA{ zg`*{gtIJ;19sTLJP*l(_>2-Fj)+;!Ub*B|g&S9tIR#TT4p<81b`CRgJzh!cbI5k*B7MpQGmxR~-{@$7=pdPE^rtFMStxHTUkBK;spqS zgj^Px49|~Iw*%e+MnUz^O4RH4Zz8yn;XD;9-ZlKOxAe%vRd(X^45NiziG60Z1>71{ zRF&Rlh4FDni^8eU{_qfWrsdi$ca^!Ze0^;{%f#inD3cQ7=(fJ%O+nrqk0@q_cT&JB z%0TioCm;|*RI`zE(8RUzx8iE1oLH$6SR}pZp_wOukUK7cuZMt+JeT77rtT9N;=ail zNQ40QFljEn;)f6*rj0j57eAS+O?f{*IBzWD9*E4?fp_H-mjc8h;ce^lklkjt7Dd05 ziSaL$5hu1Wwr{CuZ7`B7@xRfl)+faY9z*Jpo%eAq%|^MM<+jVfaR*(en#0>;V|P8?0unwg+O2^Ot81Bya_1^bUfH-JkCy;eXJm@@orK zA{r)+j(COW9`ECp*^!GP{sweTa-%(c55z%qk4`!w=_+}_$}GmSlHxFjZ&i+{WaG#a zy}(5CK{4SZjqmi|Cqpdw$~Nx8&68x-PvWM8AqREr^g{&t>6heykr(?9 zpyl^T+6uv@<*}ZVW7)yW!(qUNt%0U_4(+f^m2!1b#{Fs*?YCmYS2tOQ)#VBj)*FS; zWh3y+osIhMoyk&|=7eS+PsJAHfTDN(5Tf=Dn<>VKh0)O)-vbR%BCwZGC2%5yAN%j8 zKi;0UsL8ms<#|O5N@bTJQn6t;noK#39Cq<5h%OPh$pBE2OCU3K-|jRrB@3g*FM`T+ zO2YCyw5YD|O0)!z_}-4Q>7YaMM0Af<9;dC?ce!1U7r4Rqoys#xtSuoED!_9}J@QL0 zwDteA0QKrXo<XX zFWl!-n*#N5|IJ(WiVOMZMAn|kHTw-u!_s<6IMxTjgsBm`DSF;ePFLQQAUoWVm9_)Z z?Q-vV@f>g7GGJEQg?hu_)9lXapW96zcuTWcM@tV(;m~#vm_@$IIbz|X%7%aSnD7vO zm^$n?_G6Fr$Y=>>ndW#p?={RTyY5}9t+TB<+0w^%00C{c8l@K3nA>N@4%CAC;}!CXyOFjnExhfEmh2p z11A{kA{7l%9XZ>^7(RA5S!7*M_Ny^H#4p*X4~2JKYze5xTo}T2vXSa4LZHXn1Wl>q zGEJbU##$;eO<%mq)YEJPlNAlDyW{5liDXmz(kx1sBm8*S+X7@xEwHuk>(grp^v*aK zE?|0_P8kq`eY>KCkW-^R(i-r`4IbF8l)iMnj|1P!d@!ofo4;#!c z3i^)8Unxgws24@US4Zdd`IRQ0(tZ`*R2FwFPZcDsmS54G@+O=1YI6KVj+OOWw?VZK z$(l-W;E^2;OiYN~uSId@-wU--?`Gr$#mj}kBRZfO z&Qm=zcM}tm_{l{bf}a~;@sVxssf-xhr{8dx2G<7WQpPq5o(~Y|MMMnj>n9jXOb*6K zv!?D?Tn`QH>z+9!gtn3GY(#MpEJ5Jw&NAD-=0JbfXSa^4DNDJ%sqC=Bu~RsRf4)2v zRLh>wH>jqJ$%=Wo+v`Hsz1M_z%6Je@LcqUbC;TxAXNrbqa<)BZW~3``{gur@NuJ-3 zhM+@9iTAnP3s`Q(W~4Gxp_7*a5ih)RwQYei&*Vavov(;|S*xaxoq&7XX3D`I7WYK_ zd|)}|4=HU}(Yf%!pE3uj6q6lB?@2L3H8#LCX{Ll48Dy^SXOE? z7(!m65&FkxX@cxGqNy3fA7J_)bV@Ha{DiT|3fQE;nrjC}B`B%3oIau|Y3M2w65lB% zuDK^O2bej{PUqdjpq*exK}{~WUU>`vvv`kRZpWVMmKPuX{;dm7MIMkaAvhI7BYzId zrIQtaA89V7gB0u0Z@Tz%R z6>_tO79+s29SUWM70ue$+)pnT%~GN}G%RZdz>}@@hq;FH#iwT4%QcrKZje0DU2g^} zt_-l=-e}Nb9-09aCF5Wp1wO3rJT+8;!Hc2DQr8UPIe!7CGu?Sg#?iHzF<1~+HgC5` zbaHxsQVXwrWpb^nB#}UvtW1e+m$mSvX4by0GvbD;{HHNa)N);(Dlgf~hZ5_PJ)uVI zVaAo7){h$}@6!Jckr>_E>4Z!Q&g(z$-git$}HKPYpn6TV$AiIKpo zviFxf`&MPP3F}2}ol%AWAMzn6A+AcCLoxd^mDqj_QpR6^bAs8!exkd>_xV$f3S3{3 z#-Es^09fansy+68`T4BJA3Zydljh7%hNvl?72GiDyzW@X)-wMYvMNQ<*o^u0mffOB z5??f0duIxFWby9UNfK#~1EO6T-@+0$#UB{%6!nd(UNEKU$D_opA{i@7z&@rHMsG-X0Fy|C+}3A)57e?pW|3gbl5+@6s=}B~GTU zdMqK@Voes;B(cutwhXe|OiscIFvLwgWx*@W##9Ts8wmnLC-DcuP=m= zKvG~8cS|-)xCcnmR?xk9mE$z0_3<|_N%6-8$N)R4> zkw bqnW=Jku9hF;m0F9Em`6ca1XBL2UecV6T~OsZzI!@5DRNs?cx1v%0&*H|0v% zJT*AupSo1z@_aqsVhm?#+97@+NEUC9K*tTM=yK_Ju`>4k=+taLCTj2Icg+;#01=p@PS^bM z<{2Xn37Ss`wR+hfv;?Ksmrh5E0mkdW?0YE(u^J<+tghur=*Dqcp%y2czAg{ROK0Vu zainnuO6XM-8qv24J!gVpojWWQPyfgg);rbRNj{dEl`MkVe0sZpz>poug_7sZltSzDE z1sT6r_S(+_Sf%5br|It6o9ll8Xqa8&Mj${=xd9nq5me^+Pse`VfPae);-{nHyaDEAb9uKK%>s!qjY3k#^6% z@G|paAw+pY^W)cMSWsQqlKiV`{-l@XqRHx$*l4$MLA)}PGFGSlM}bAQIpSM9!-3Lo zoKn+K#MreMNN>cJgfS};V%bb)HUny~{tOHq2gJuQfRE%CMyKpA!w?kxZhBchC+97( zY)LPzH?)tD?mzIWySzAOUfAcjhA^DrQd_;ETtogCc^hmq@7Zv)$OpehlT##rxbJTG zeSjtgN{5r?e+(iUTqptAL<11TNDuS4-#;|5K)rjeyb$P$S~0#IFLh-b=bW#8z&6V= zvceMVfxb&Fz_`rQ{~eB^q8wl=s;XhUBi^kSsN7^AA)~VAN$8veU(q5hRL?V$_d-wmefZ7wkR-cN|&-xD9 z0os?Z(U$@VR?}UuKSt7WGSMmqZQG*I`>LELr8D;|cRK&T(${uG5l~eaMA6k3RY4|X zN!_@L4ZZwn6h{Kd-kKAgiHCnPuQ}EgH z(Sn6Mz;De7SO81b6~aKIdw&t4=zVPRR>x&lZHLZr=sNMeutCE|j%L?f;(;FfE5JNk zb)J?7%)}*@mgCDoMIU8_Ew7&ZtTe)RrLmK$6EghD{<0IeUSax!*~)$7-i^0gF5Esmo=31BlY(5C#>tm6 zFcyNQyJ+C1~U#lQS^QQkhu+*te(2^6n!q^MtPRQ$BArfF-_&r=_Dc2 zH#sgEOaGomuqRXzXeMTS7f0f@64RWZ?`i2_AYdQITRM*EQjxstRaxhf8IZk8>7R3Y5Us$4-tzJ~vCN?ZT=g6o_xWeXzDql$VK?iFugp+c}2RC%gAAFypll>N*%ZqirT|dRYW@aML2fl!LO%pWY8Vy|sL@sx5dtC&8N8Sa)Zy+N-u&C<6 zKj$gBZIjE4@KX^_s*t!Q187meJiXCYY4GkCY$n{3fT@w*zAv<-CQCzhQf$8|qM%+( zN;=r}fJ*U4!c_IE+2r~IRp%N@@Oiw;LeR`oau)C$!&oWxoysVx2suG41*6gXhsh{V zlv?(LKMFbrk@60W*Cs1njHQ)bAkvPfW5fQtSV#Zgi(`O~0Ie?U9+ywmG$&c$160rf zB*&;>(6>Gh^GXLcsT0y@JNbWCm>x%_h1?ZNbU2}i&t<>jqV#%y75WU34lM z*_JULj!}wE#`dSjC@(}?PMTluPo3|Vk!^FrO}84esl{#I*>lEU+WJpU$WEZ!t0dOwIgTLrgEm%B5473LK}KkyCF2Oz@Z70t(IL0 zBqdgKC4E#l!~$wzUAMBjIf30IlXgJKAN|gcJzQl2#;pJe(lA$slJ)eRGs45i3$YWcHQI zU^986FsRqFLR$5fY9JXuOkpm_Vvq16E{eu3kOCkjMV4zbjEm*l06`BM+OOu6p4tu> zo|P{xuz~V0HQ_%WpXtJ8zzL1?d-{w!#o)*A7$K$Cbz)RbAZz;9{oCfp31Ct}#cmw~ zsU+1E2Q0NIfF*8C%&-lqJ@{Kbo+gNYMy%GjfwqI6#vuL5-a#JCKYpGM4D2z2iMS#D zm1M|<))C+W&Iy$KcGy*UxmqZkxFvYcjDH)34*E%(R^fT*quxTUs11usuvPqD^&%fg z%!rGI-0cSp;=YhR0TECkyll2D<3bx>KP6_+?AGbvcv6UF|Q>UgeBU zQ9hoHi8r|NPNgCW`z;BlC5c|e??%21L&m0&j&fI%7FXvwuq92VP%3Mg&`N+nxs(E< z&5Envofk9+AooSR{Q=zn9y+R1lp|?Mw9YTLe8*6l7$w+cyT8`TA!u)uFW_M%^M{{8 z#P(PAU*+*nB8}{e=UzJZeg&=aDwJp_G)+^~e$$ zqERexG;K8@9h=8QcVS&GBVr`0bM*|1CUcp7f~#8>^OWaJ7El` zIE=;OWGunJW{AYRr>@uXCkk3VH|{{LLnR?IdY(tuBK+1I`O9Rl!jSbETNH1o{8_>- z57mlb;zW;f%*T-nS}maj#y}=dyx5;H0_-y@+NGY*#Qq|2a%I&*Ntw3-xL2N1o~L{f zy)(ncB1*YV@@&o3U16tv#MPr!Si9`+m220_j=C9#0G>Zt55-Ept#mi{MzWDaRExPW z=DH}JUPE&DpX(c<{(igff5KV=_n!@?dDRQ;EX&~B2JhiG5>fw_Z`!IJwhBVZCgco} z=-^r5%sF}Hs?sbw{Cqt{P<16+xtzg`!DDmq!O(b1ycnq|`dBR>M>TW^>msgN^ZKU{ zCX`-r{Zj%p1?jQ^FD!-@Jw&r#PyMafSl*BkbgIVaxkTJ#VA8{LO1zClVvV1b#9qwb zH6rzhTPM{vhZM-e?^0*aN+qNc1+7I5*L-y&)xdlqQ_^X zc!sQ54g87djNBR_2CAI5-{D)H6Fx}?#QzBhN(&hq`%Z?d??{WT7AlGe=AhU-ic-JA z3Ez5r`pZ1BsU-mon@+%sRZN|?HB|p%%8nY@oZN+nNt;VsDXeuUbEIyBy=+SQo0~g~ zO|_zkKj^9_Y>4!CU7Zv+t2DtEV`#uQ^Xx0z{TZ3Aa%WX#R*2Q>l!vj=@7P&uzcA6< z_nz<6IE$!%8F^>=b&ewv#m2baazVcD026z$c?4hy@0{-{8=7!Qlf ztUz*j1pePQ%eTeDbE1r0V}}Zs(D-W~(ut;1%4RsDLofc4FGr2^ih9L;_ekX-$Dh@z zFD7T)3zPV$UggWE=2EOmp^n;H(bMfMP}gx$tI4Lq1I|Y<|IjDxpIMr%oq8*kyg=2+9-!)tBj zgQcQ%JdsmPmKBjxzOza`SN1v|SfaF~qw{x^tiS+q=M21=jhnDIh}lh%vuPrtuvz!1!W+B(Cto=@bNcZv;@ z6jO?1X&PoeO-i+BMZ9xzEm?um8DvBID;3I`=dF#in8Lm*8Mqu@L=p)D!02&4VTOYu zA(dTHVx1L$N62RQ>|cvppDX|QT6!!KDr;*c{tFcrq?m#7HK##}@zvqHZN;W-nvu=C zhH?25zqcx0C)1=v*fG@$5k)k+)N!ajqP}?)XO|2WY^AXbum{5@}-6W&+)x16J4R?GM$ zs2-j9q>sT{r3OhFPNT8Y$$c%@EEJ>r$3L5Jk9)P$bv`DX#m(Id`Ep@ZXmV+lsJ_kf z>Or$#oyc{&CBXDX1Fz-AQ+P)-y@16k)I0`?&&=S`o1#05H(M#bhLZ6yMBcZ2VRn78 z!iGGIsajg&Go3beOW4@VX*&gu4 z*D#HZ6wA<2^t>c>+qX(d0uQ&ed|6=*$NP7^{3q%cnnnR(zftd!$Gg6xevFIT0OAX(l0U^i#{m zTLOwj%FjgryfZtv)PC~G905#OpJ_0Qg&=x1ZbcLr@Db8D#;hsvJB-b{Z_sEp z+)HW@DkEGe#)T>6Hp4PsV~!j#p-5dB`!|6Dtc3AyceylpkIJCQ&#aeZ3=41eGo7le zvjsdv<3%w7&c#eX2lythl>-xqzEQEBUc3OTuF=B=JvsK!Xq04OC#_N)#O5D&Lj1eY$a5x9$Nay?u5k}Z&|;y^<6I3}2al{& zl5;6l`x|6QD$>Hwq|@Ghe$6+8RUn^AlX91Sr9^eNM28lWDXWi1plvj3TJ?PPcS3y& zYUZnF1dcPYFMlgJQy6%lrW8`BwUj!ZVnaBJD8fkWq-c%8%~XgAq1;o^`=e^osV}Q4 z5RFdY6AXxymu)eHDU`DiqBw`oB=|_9Lv=kWaj7v|yLaYs80#H)=9x@kVU8yB47yc$ zg%(i*Oh`2Ya@V`Tr3zE8iK1CqZ-2Sdk>`kADngCEGHOA(;aCxs<6APd1}zQaP5%Eq zP%MU;=WJF1>+^}D=)eaV4~p%&A9wF<`d*~BD4X4|$O^E}qR{t;adATM{!a^_m%u~Tgw2Zf zYG1|g#V$BfL2O>26YnpcYK^j|zHA{i{!O9DzTV_CLHaYA7f_QK9oSIprJY1K&5mVaBNwy4PR-K6i$uKz zrfMBb^9uop=kyq&y~Z%g9Io!b3@*aN*wGzdbw?1rbq+Gwx@6M@SdZq24fKUXB;b9v z6N76)wLI0eCN75LrwY>=lcQ=EyRud>hrS4e+uq)nRW&E*&{G(>FDH{uLiMU8w+R+< zn6(h(h3F>QV!+%D0^q8s1?5pO-X<^c!&eZyp$*=UwTVs|4Y0JHi{>cNHTzz!*SD^% z9{y#u>!XYknxY{E)PJx+kf&_?v7a83NFDjz>;}qs^$@4MCf2|;{;ray)cVd;WPgSU zPm0|WkJoD76wWKkNA1ExRYQMv7A?MXGLO&WXCNB$CD#2gkwqKzBRWmiM>7FyMoZwhpYD?#BYA9 z+@~&ktjauT4?$269>+pozzX|;fHwWncaN&5d`d#f@(-Y47RQJr;-=;mjbvfgm{gyxJiF>nCFC^tjh&E5GlB}}RJB&Gt?e#W$ zy&36FhmoSrJpW;mG~vLKV=-9_9O!#W@TE%E__aqL8?$<&WhdgF3EOf7!_8R#-e0ZV zKE5hVCQ4E{z-NoMNla39Gq{Oui8`MUAqul)hPbdRYo#z3=iX}_j|7Ja?Y?K)sP%{& z6KhBat&t3o-|Jq*tE${$b5jUNsu%4K6rJ37`oHK>B)bjnA|LJ*^>VB{A!Fyxy6Jp; z^RI31G+5uzT`+oP5DBy_S)e2mQ*hggru+0(2|=zsh-z|&WIn5%%0!)>-G?I_ zF@wC9U+v7NZAilWy0v{(W)QM&z>NYX10}BKPuh4|Sm57?bJN7%V`>u9Y>*$e*7l`E zK1Cri#Ok$Xo@)No8kmg%ZVkojU06fr*j`NxD8#sRJq~+5u=yXA+8m@kLA&~rDTw&9 z%@oNfccqQ#hp}MkbTX?xy?>*@s-eo9HDWhA$%KZi%y-^}?@%-Kyt&9IV@l5BquPw5 z2bcrQD?%meM&5M$6utX698>2^oTJ;OpU90hrbnr|+t>+y;|>@RQl6yzq(uf%RIE;s zzwrINqD`7!L|&h$`wW}f-pEpmSyEx<1M=1fl&kp0(v7GFgmko$-Mx&x1hU1%iqZ~` z&of&0LlFqpHRnGfuJ@;EMw*NUdg2K_8*h1g%CTB??bbzCP73<2v9gULZ(6xfpmE)# z`GG?%Op~&XQZxP}n6NFgUAbj{aWs}t^s<0X=$I)NW|(CsR%)28K-Cgqeq1~`bIOl@ z(W*Puan7P8=(AErjM*2~YGx%Ii(*0L@NN~(#Hw2?-RnT2%{AArnlZ*41Po0p*e4FJ)S|!`alM#e6cx<(2xW4l_WPjWntRzRR3$n#bb5Ce~g_S!r z-PiV!B=me{Qv$dCT9DN^!u+P-c_A3)4)lMSu}cE|k3x{u4w}u#Ma=!jLjgAn66&yd zI-m(>!Ix*&Y5qC{bf+=Ew-^i(Z#3cmRz(Q2V~^%5mOK!Dy%T|SZ08+Z3`IQpc8*X% zH$zwFFF+m^Vv9Uz5nc>UNZFr=J=pSfRD#6MOg4G6y;t`PvNSW!q(g|TMmM*JpB{3R zTX=o2UP=BqxPqyl*za1``lkLenQ3wq-jl5kAqyKjb!MMRzzOPwhq^&|^dnI-aK#@P zn+mV_B_T_RlBVD^LzIM}WE+QvSdl4UDy?(*F{*zUTb=)VnMXxj99&6^d~%!} zTX>XgVNusmj;a%)`-2dk?NQ!!)1Mx3db!5h5>h#@+|S4rqZycFvy`s+xzH;`C-t^* z73K)`3Rd|>YGjFjGF^?oG_SiVpLAy^>b4Zkt-0>xJPSelOTgVFw~091ibu{_;r1fI zf*vEX&5V29u$bI<&_n0BvKJRbX0|9W32Zecdxmmheuv}(?s0+fMjKx?yv<`N6Xl;`CmR>)4xYR8l;El%iqPMyA8ke;ks2Jp} z2_j`I#A}_a`w>qgy%bA#m+GM6%7BqlV$=}r1#uHgP+N^mv1V;^_cz*>7FAg+3Zf>a z#5-xWo4I}1dU`}ZUyWC$6TqjYu?gXhtEPll=nOS;b1TR6qN_>`4`SIgAsFdg{+uaC zwI20X=C;O*=c0NLvQIbEummf6K5;IFB>cZzrjuya_5++b$jY{?P%jD8b|a{ow1g&v zPjy@D8Yc9+wYk<$^?}KqU=}tcHuTliS`mtL7GjxO?vV!T!i;A>$c*L{8Wp#v*VEMaK7 zZ7?rjh0gwvcacKXpAM8`J#4i_VRp6~q+hHjV-@~v>lt9pY=}c$@_x*ADU?+2ZS_MU z2cfz1d|dv@W!Ct*vlsJ_EQWvw1`L-G=L-KCiwW#iN|eMzvi6;>_uonMHjv`rPO@a& zd;8zp`R_-o1DDB@uz=Hsw$mYrMkDbyYn!7L@dfG{ib)ju=nr}8#O=}c2_1b^qMN1; zMaBSQk^kw<{G51MJ4S;q~lVoxU9lCtUs~{N98DM0ImG8Jx>*z*b0r@^mh+4~CN_FQ+=Yb8!)XWd3-+1P`m1hZ| z&EMP7;%+8!a4aoJ_gl8=K{`Zb#%+Ny9!=_C)yBPM+UHo#&|e~o{fD|4<=Pc552A1f zTpKLX@KtRaBpYum6PHyj|Exw4%PmeQ*P($7+EmE5n@`|_S{@Yme?ZHb**ZUJMjU%w znFNln<=jA_h|Z^rFAQ`n!yA+rtSM!QL z$O(8u0Hw!w)CZ6lV>I?t2@)&mKC5tu;&K{<+xw*j0C#5%m(V7#6C&y0?OQlW}%BRNaZ^`C& zN|SH8G32sCBRjzsQ`|*4CyeZ1;AkdVmiwCc>9gt8W;JTQlcnIOQnN)m7JNeWXCa#& zvn89dq*XkxGAVPWgee7tm4Nq&>QTpD>{ifQGcb> zRF5arm|w|MRA!@qQJ}RNN3$tAJcBebp?+$ltM*i^}a^*l>jED949R*@zXV8K99-E%sUCv?ue) z_JJeF(*(j18UbF+j0?EgjE~0Q3G(-(B?4Nl@+g``6r#OwJULF1VRF#!m(uk2Y(r60 zIGIfbEHjm{GA-;{SQZQLa0598gG`w_rK4|L7{^5xX)`Z98H@uN{o7^p1pqNI8Sqwj zp4$SqFEbiW*WgXZs+u!`z&?_HVj=sRsx~L-x(d?Q1$N7XEg@J#_B}+S1Ap5n`=_ye z=+~2DnNxN*l9>nTh^BbICNeS&2O+`0<-5`-g`Y_(hOuZeh4XsLn+wzie&CW_XS`Y- zI8&H;d-Qkv1~6jvhX+B34H)8KyaTyxjqO;8b;jw4{iyC8h5t>wHv9{*isN45;cs=DI8=7@jm zF>$@YW$BeDLHDXEH>=9C3Od5J0i!D2C&d5W0uaFc!IqnY9c#pr8O7Q@%%E6)-SBKS z(QsN;uVD9I(#VW(l9F3U=Fy_%((^hHMfHL*X9x@-pI^Gci zc_8VcU8<)o)z{K8kY$FwRX`3d%4LJVoJv`S6zAP2O&pzH!FC4%PaQWySUzgc7_Ptc zccL=0X_%hCWGA5S^-09}@U7T$gJxt%_@MvQ@C_jGI@bb$*;^EEw)J@&Qa)5^fXJom zf`Gd$VWy|#7_XFZ6DNjR13Dt|k92m1iG78Yet`X8_+mzhh$%Uzo&xomURrmXjbR@_ zmf38A*wvsSd&O0|!C7@_Dl1>p^=-ib*nM<$Adb8P-FGD#?QwGcb>_X-4&&9I=3QDb z;}cuJe(ff!3IF zl$wgA|EkSm73AoBR4>!ePVuY$L!Yq`VmcXVpJ)AnQ#nt%(5+tZ7qq6w7c{QkJ7n0r zXs@{IzLP&Zxw7LK(S});K7rE? z0I31*gMVwWJ@4cF9oE177^F4Lr2w4H>ATVwB);cm&qhmv8y^GSpHn1d5`3ENe$P;a zV|;8g64F@*WNHKpTvcapnl4*eP8MGMuGB;LmcS?QV}tPDyQtKv`p`ReH12E+`=!&uP_xO-@t~*c;I_;m?|~cxS^?GvDZmnDte8l z>simH$CiZaDiSBlDavG34lbcg<*4`1r(`{v=YFJ5W zVVqa=lS-*F@)M9YGkoksR)&LO_i@=M3CH|w^1uHIAZ3Z} zPYM%&^pi}wvtpyVgy)xzHr($)Qb^)FXsoyA_mPr>r}vQ)miX25{^c}i zdq1*>nYW__lPD=ubhzP^B*8_H6&u#ogrjNr=Dl;74oIh5KXaoZ-=t#j2~yvcPL}lu z0mjq!sQ*11q{mCeBIg|)*N1k2DBt-|@42>p2a{F-hZwb)0{Klx5iwvLvuI{^;9;#JlxD4>^R zOIgfnF?hRBBi1@2WwLTj7gM8?zLcO5JA3KchUesaLl9rK4BNF}F;iDDIK-T0! z&wzct2KCHQ3!c=bWbkbiJ7B;iV42=WZ;(w%Kvv-r#lN9=@Fn3yE&)~{f#5;COBkkk zy7%zQ2u$`h9~LuvebU@zs(yodBBD3~=xIe4D(=a9#to8=>Yvcz4;c{K@-ov3I-7M~ zf+9W@>o_?g0mMeW*g>W`%2!tRpokg&;w>3$u=ZE%o^h$la&2b{C{#~B1>9tTOfTx& zH*0Mkx?OD(E*GGbwlclMdRvl;p#}FsIY{rJuD0)DYv_SV05}ouC z5cvM@ExT)VU$EUXaJ-QR9QA*X+2{EjYbsO*&boP}35=5kHWOVN>4TFXANla4)uya? zKF8K}Bz=n2^ThIH*csS(Gyz>aw3HZ$p_-0-ZzV8eNyV6PthvYttwOE&9gT|HN2729 zmFY4@oeZz|L#c9$H4@Wht*RkHm*^qi3CGDbZHgi!`TWDX?Z~mO^(9;P%O8Za`@Ta> z{aE2DiZaD%Tx_(hIi|!@W-d^;mB4&gjYxFvj4DFhSFJDNMLz{5lQ?ykAbI2C zMn6mnY_p3=1g)C|Q^~O{&@*Cr*`+Ko8qc2~iCsS?X6H;9Mdp+K@H+{{K07KP%8&76lb>lwMj7D?hEV2*#yz4}Pv3PQLb#C9n$<t`=SJ@q=tejz34=P=7PvVi2N!FGqo7bN-T%&u7CLBY&!!yOD9F>{J z+7pVIfzH!*MR|r5&BGr;$kZfHT?m2j=Q~Eqvl?HVObGpI-)i#I>~l9>hG zRuL!x)^HZ~)J&50GHPsF9sD3en{yb0O{Ud-o1BA+ewwZIoU>D*Wz)JixZ~g22{OJj#H38A< zlswkMCslQmNZqtO6q37$y(2-vdj+Z#plzBpq^yKi$ zqt@y3%~FlQwkZPY%9f&{vx0IRlEQbe20Hc7dr z8#=N;yMP=D WO>(Ra)pjPSEUb6Z%>}dM$kj*2&;@=EWxc&3eEZ}&y1hJstvZOG> z|9Jw#NKAj+mc2QzJ@7mjch6>72HK$k^OeP;nl|KvObU_pm#Cd-&sk0Tm8I1p&>I4f z{#AAUBqep}+B8*RsdtqNogpo{A z2;pjSY{-5y0JiP79VWQu%=?=e$mtK=mjL4RfO1zBHIux{<~g-RRS}0-2K*1VMXyue zxTA2ku6qEL1`WrG8W^Fv`X$WjP5OWXbHi7l&xo!gN&xu%zEL>;>dWIlOtw%o-Tikn z_@q5Tqj0%Y&5La{a#OhM)5hwrjMpF1iQs=?bdQMttO2b6oB)6DZV1tN);J~|ln*-~ z6JB@+uFi@Oc1N6@TaB*xQ zKqydsr|kiF9w7O26eu=U58itO00waF3}CS8ZLM$upn2jnzah%jePe zHcd$=`+V-+jT6;1azXGf>dWlmCH-`K-qktWvuNm~X$Vs$F|fwd3ZG)x0~+DVgxPAE z@q6rczs7I*thqoKj7YY2WaL;ux4;IVPGHaZ`t4P1>!$xvjqyB?#@ZXJx%x@!<1&9j zM1}5{UP`z&P|#L-62$EOvQ(SjfFc3Ze2ewK`2jHC6o z@L31DAMYVZ+M!EGEdHoBOSq0wt0-=9ep5#Jino*q>6uLXeogCAK^6Q>#u?d9>C8tIeY5UT^v@6x!IzcKu+@d< zuM2SA+mEKO^o7uU|voiE;i{u3u)3Z&vD z>E8SXZnB}8Q0y8b`+_iP*d891xL^;xX9!#I#bM0nFh*|7{vWXg-A-Fx=ymsqvO8l@ zNsi5C-=Vh4>5i$UZ|KuWtc^Qah2!lX=Rf0}ghSjtN0uk8TAPMl#M?c+?M{|0bUVwI zm~Q4lUj+IL3maTi*s|LzJIg@0o!^{G&4rp@auZQEmF)nT11!+MS%9&}%* z6^7-GlGeAMcHAYA(d1q`f3MKoB&*hrJDhEBW7!(F=2kS(kSwT- zywR`{J9l60@;uT!4ZkU^<9cj_aj5+xo{5H(Y=%tI-OIg3kA&=eML-aV|3y%Pj9JWlr z=3tn5){Y1GS7<8I6f*&USu+q@o;$Qm-$1wCzTwh&QXNx^VOO-_35_gew3bCtm`M z6HF@lA34D~X*ycx-vZk1m<(l2O3Zj<^Us6qZ1hiBmEpZbxRGp_uSp^)Z{GdyExbe!p&ZpVhb)hK1b1a0}p2KXN!hdG_0fXSMqq{5tcPDM0Qb zzWKLUlXv6W=YqMa5qwG6Y<*5acezFKKo5Alh=umL;GAY^1he5CaE_!E!DB z$9@;o4@#P~8!SmvIl@reW_dS-aBT}rmAnMTQ8fo7-mw~K33}4G0bVRdtPY6D_C`J7 z;HcF}B2h4mMM*{OL0E@|$c2!8WZrjiZzP%VkDc!8L=-Bm6p~>+PQL@7v95?R+;H6k zY$O?RTL-u!D66pfZST0%oYx?+rbNK4>u&XoF!iftz6K$p)1~!$sHT;D#SIab)QGE{ zB0C|3oo|4ALJI{BJOx{&4H;k7%Ie?c-AIw|=&&QQgZM_DmGV*K4M=Z3B$D#xUBfs& zZZ*}jz*{0TO|54p9VxV2iMD;VB1L&TF`J+dQ)wqCRVbE)pMR)4(lvz0Ew_T~M0n4Ty?NA%*@n z5=fGkkVrRJd!G8@TgJ`=6Q@e8WZE3pbOQ_V4LDMo0gG0T&!Y~rpq|(!zHh@yY74yFDZ`{~j22P07x9Q{w5#9Me?6LIBLi zBCW*p9G%)0G6V0>4^e$eg*?O@29*;B<0M8Bc%Ns`dz3Z*N7UTEW%&6#JVQstZR8LL z5M@!<*Bzk4TaNw|s=a%Y@@C&IBjs9zV^dSGn{h}p^7-RVG^bW%wLjMT;wv5fj(06` z!qF^U+JE*0pHZ(RC=`*A_a!MUTxXk@^7n86er7}+WfLA30OuI8`$j>GV$1!afCLok zqo-jcIqrO!z+Ipi{>-4k(vpYN8n>h8^g5H91v>j{CbiHQiM|C1`mupfZg@`^vB&?a z)aaAA`DLT7gcWxTDK}lTOFvZm=&Jxi@3hH3J~rc{0;Bfa`?#onLe!rhS(wPL-q9!F z2RA*MGiz-C@0sfiPkr*FS0pjCI9f15h{Tu?E%jGo0+))Cw8mP6F_8pEzyd#xB-lAW zsisT1m{e!q=@h(T?B!~D$=m8mwt7MKkYu9vDfA^rO%Z!RMA{o0vB;}hwhXn~uElF2 ztb%jR9`4RSi?VD>QJq_7cIQOhdv)=pLTf3*?=|f@3g@Vl`{Q1Pd|%G-{>U@$Anv_F zxa{*B_AfAoUv<(1$e{28DA(7#H#YXLsS3T8r2Zhu=G<97Y7d|mZLjLBd3NaEl{gVM z)Ts9SufHQuiM@kvJa-#xSad~Z@?v@7F4F^jcOMQARwz6*)#kdajl)OiPU-o=>dZ_t z^w-RD3@5enl}Bj})i^hn--GdlaMtUKi#=`DCbPSu3Aq{`WHSnU4BL6e=<>f}?~LA} zd0U!AU3-l9MOG$$$HiucmJ2Gy*!V6)W3cy)`Jp;B^ypg1WOQv}$EkeKED~HTp*7f% zjW@1$%>60wTv?;pClGA?Iby4EKJ-mwFBMMSxQ~n1>nuwE`4S}tKnhUWZ9yrLg7Y8I zmj6L16xXSdz`wGtcTG?>IXQYo$@ixkhgYqmNfONP2t?bokbZ0fZMuw;xEIi|Zsp#o zStYg_>k~$tiPP|XvB#sLv$5;30sIkgk0hU=GazN-f6eY1-Fv07d(hn1&W(q3ftKZkCi(2gGfGx)iir{rWyiY z8kiZxTcrI1H#tqXEc!fuqf89rSIXlzP5`e%8u#ic&n7Y^yUx~x~ z@b_w&V12soDbL1qFGktwz?(z{->WDuu=M!sX^q^0skp)&+lwCq?Y*70gQuhqC30#jn<1vJE~bUyY<=K;gPmlW0Bl)sA0;%% znS<<4nRe3L#k=m(<~XXG8rA!x1M4q8Q*1FDXqB6g5!Pl!{NIWzYlq+$oPf`U-+eHp z2G=~W7a#{XF#oN5rnaR!`Z*#D;So0|1h z2r<4}>xK^_rT!#ZJU|txUA*Mj;qB7fq%NR@KA(pO*K!dy{=Oc2V>JthLPpkPYkvtcvg!aeQ!nv5fuUTc_`6A6eIL3>$(Q7R{k=c|FM)r2 zM`*tMWu5N0+0jkzF3QKOw4wqSp@f4J`_mV+>DO{&NI~~LP);xZSChGFrKP2HGf#g` zj;Sx(v1r_?M7;f^{t5Ypw7omw?*Z;Yt^wT zYy{*J&E67(4y5#b1k)vSs0yqUufG7h_0m!Ec@)J8G){ewlK{we0CW>v*oK8yWXbsz z1wAEKrW?7o1LcSWWgKdk{}xbyi!Mk5!kCmofY5;;*1UiVVN|aC6>_eyxqrR75udaO ztw~M()qU(2N*5P20!=M}K#!(9IQ1U^yI)uf5P-O60M03!BKLU0JWB)|bsK1;TrToH zp0pr8=?cSm>*#@_v4p%2kUfzlfnx0e>}f7-atf5Fr%o=YFc{};mR4??wdwz$x*i%<3bQl)rlcmuww>m4(v& z_xR$RPiZ_g`#gf;fCqgL3G3mm&vq*i%+geL7^gOMa>OhP`KkXJNk$Xt11f+}+PG!o z{1uGtnp=(kCsgNgDQrlk5QOUkb37oeE50sC(O!Cg?}XmtI(kgS{)X)WC#Hpuv63ZD zT@W!o5|$~~@Tu1n*XG65=uLH7p|Jn^NacDH*}BaUr}~xdx){&&cs*_6&J*FsbwYaR zw~{F$S6tX*rDHT5$?wC@K$uRVD@9V^q< z<#Om=b(cP(+*Li><5l7@JT@gt6BXs*8>exFFIXshJv!SIn?*|Gl0VB$&i5$Ns%vRR zs-A0gYZ$f?Y{WF8L#nXpgVzfC24GJMxA#DVaAjI~M={Zk09WvJzw+wF^UF%Ms&@3o z9sI`n!uj8^bjEudfTLrSGVWEYd?CVjLB0nHBBToW%-nk;`mOx2rKXTMfnI29dMDZEGJ{|UCR81O$x`axDFy!)}E~g^nkqN+7V!=;T zKTzDwrWHWi8Tpa}ILmMZjGX2!YX(MYyRNxV76qe-2^#9k=BCbq36c%>L>|Dzh4fWF z$HkxTX)DaXkcpR#awiQNUj2ee>kw@e_r8b$WBu}0TOXlq(O=%dXC$JGTu%le`puG< ztf2<96A^}?LVVeh3Wy9_4e*o<=TGl321gr61Qnv}b%w*SN>hb5sbNP8c}tcg*)*1{ z{7N}Ui7P}gx2DL1RUeR}8|Q$?tT1jh$c=&XO=QHij()%iYAQqW_MvwPC3y73o4lBg z@{%~FegGuV47PzT`@7cQHySeN#Qz-=iV~2;HiA@yAwOZ~D~nmQdM~qg+L%$1qF&6=`Qs2)+3Tpi3P zf|kE_<#53i2OiemektJVowRg`Sos3xhJE z$Av%Iz5m!f4Ht8dnH#|VV5|E1Dzj|sWi!_J9G+7r+UdiXGR}*1+8j%`Xt*UO5R#O8uFT@7{%se>UGX^|%$f8YjMA*o)vWwg%Ti?dX(7EV28?pakt z!_%TBSlrY{WrWH`=hpa4julq-ub2Cbj;h7J$HhnS57dkypL^&r&nX1fmE#|Y0vfHn z)PHP!NWQ+XsEFC$)jNq@EEH7sVdC<*iDd!-*GPO@{U;bStP>LEmeGob<-I%~)T--D zO!*5ZnIBxa@~5T`y^>@<(dVH(%3B^P;GYWCy!}b&iq67*hs)0|9^X>^mq_;Ho6!H> z0$P(hK9)8omY6XB=9K9ymn}7| zq3{+-!ECMR?~Ak`;fXav2c6N1&0jP9hZc?NFy{4U9Cpqatav&3f@JA}jJkqW$$xas zzOXo!@Sbg!?3PDyp6K|>RKb~E!4d6p(-UAe1&RCvyWwi`!*h-Pe#cM}5^qL2Z97C~ zWRcrQ)@+UI68-jPQF5keQ_^e?`{H+~8!%Bef3&8Go}IyfS75NL52F_C>vPo^rf~e= z{$JW!)cAsF4ymlwwOR%p_!g}F;VFC*LV|{!eS5L45v+QR=~|on*bz#O94XGke*4yw zgS<0&{Kw}>)whW4>g(wBit8~=E$@+=lxMCX;Wt%cs>A`YD+@Xoy%YG0dCZ&0QE{&X zm2cY>n;G9}ZT7CW7YV84luX5kdKP!3!B4}>7Q&Bf6gDA8rmt-75;MEiZgEX1Nr|Qi zdKp5xv$d?F%&OqWF10|WL&|=~ofl(9ylXrZ^hoqSPN%2=^OFx<`!@k7>syAuUVwvD zx(gfW`0V`>opq75Q@ElE9O&F>)^V}5qGeN&@7a`_8OU7}_=~h=Bm>6MnNwwn1h{#| zZ;oQyQ0cMIih{0Fk*BU`zK4o`xu#P}AmLabuWJEKJr)Pg`aBdmjHJSY6PM_C+mTfY z-z#u!PcIjOI1N*4=&WOS#6YZ=UO7bEY9$Zd;R?$-=*?dOZpi6V1E)@f%e**__d7iF zxJKyw@5wFu9sJ)(4y7)!%+e3jH&~x}qH!~7%E_408XO4MA5_S`#zLtNt_Hj+lxUpc zM2u@~qNWr#q%Y!=kk{xnF+}TJ*u&DA?R$}xW%<_QDkf0sf|1BG8s}ZuEr1NRmbGBDg+8+VjH><5X>Yqa)7lSr9L#klKB{tCQZ(hW2zX(i?v+#Nlw^W~bK?^Z7 zn#J+8;R`{`4Mkdg3c&4dOYn{d^MHW~)htX0BYWbbP=9GX#$cBZ7Wij!p>#UahyR?> zhH0!_b=AT`RzopjZ|fsn7@9{BEH>G_R!wPwaF)zLv7yH3ZFgGg$t-?0N1viiG1Me5 z)^=3_bf&oiTIT=6Hd5>pg>)Xs*h$JEkDof*3uM-o>7zr?aJ&|5(5tjVD*TUYN~m4G zPDjn;QsqT=IQvK4I<-=-dkn~?t+H49@hFMA(i;O3msbKe=XP9oI9K4n^*yv&hD(-1ei+|l z6lSB8kDVJ=36>fWd)|zOFn#att{YBTMJ3=5pCHK%MX2P7tqgErUo#;pX3p$2U3oCbIvV%<5nR;P(O=l$mHon&@Qbw7esFc>Y(jncTh1wT z%DC4C%Fs?tK##*Ia0i}H7j&HBGW&n_0{-eny`W^D-jK)XDOo;ByXji~vQd4z>`5*9 zjx;H!+|Sj2Wq0c2J*UCM-?YJXe%CD4dXJ7j$m-@(ToXC{;}+*IaD6dFxS(?dVq`QT zR8MnWSB~qRR_!Co12$qOEGY4dDcQz0y|Ui)Yi86v)|!eGBJC& zcVlh^=@3;qTyMukH!jQ<+wN$Vm^xBH6Wzcb6l+l?qJlFC;H}RVHdnsOk?l!}4KFum za&HzAVYohsk1Bl>al4I^OogA7w{$3BU2@e~D|+iz7QS_#v|9VXxH9JS{h+avylheO zc-@`=Q2nINWa7;u=-Vwh)4@~~wx#5jO3W2#fp;orZ>1b#CrITU!EItw!~oPXr~@>$f~sDtn%vF5>e? zHfa%ONmt%iU;QdURiR!3mv7RWp3lTA1{3p7sB&Q{k>evIlodi0BUcli{25ai?qyl^ zKCNxAASI8cW?@%=E1F0dc{#$87z;x&iyKo2Q}t|nnCh=7bTvcf3+ArFQ&b{wlY|h& zC9JH+X34dnjxfze%ZMgU{w0-a`Lpsg!@^wB4i52#$=oRI^ zCRC%OA+hUESj$wkw4CA$`$czJJWc4rmR^QnPf8k@eQUhW?Q8GoR^>~hBPjZD{S6eo z;?J~p#sTnG>h>>}<;W}aYqQ9S9Y4$rRB&BicIXaf`?V8;lH z(yxU39%tB;tZ?cOR~TPaaMI0*!I>%J9MkQ9igCT2uRMa|j^1+Ks#;?_|3Bny5~8~v zx<@sDD8MM9m2{?=v)9C5?4z%3`3-KPHRxjstDEe2;BDVhs?WSa&7rttuIkyJ{WUk= z^XCMyu@Ll?6=g<}u#`A^fQdI)l+oFW`iIfAAt7!Z9iCR+vXSSy+rDj)y}gFIUagwe z12cqkV}d|R_nNL;>xUuGb>+swn2MILaPdA?&YGWlyb1!x#)vVEceaT}r}6v()zkHV z10{tpDfjr~G1rzUVX^;mfkR6+xSg#QYeSw1L#w66RVWtUz12K0Hgd64*dQkj z&+|Ej6Ysz5Xi`n%pVO)P^#xkT<~c(8&sc==Kc+*rolgIrYRlN~7*ttF9pVlZ8b+*Ys55QBM8-xPM;Oo~#I zBy|DOFJNvEiPC&g4m4w4L4cMjLiwDFV zDlod-@~K-Ujy8>#r-1P#oi#jWa(hDW)m zwkB@N=t%h{@Lfv51pBx9$O@NF)AV%V*?F_}=547oG9Yq-RD5gmh~l`)Lq?=!IC;^w z7Rxl1H%}-7b#)Y;iDSHJ!@(q8Z|ST`Ta)ax@0_yHiV)09j`?nG`3}>eXfM{9r$T19*XLCw*b<*v%)h2taKkv) zZ%$QG)7m{imVvnh^9L8kZbVCHt^x;gi-@~Ta$$^2l&XuN;=o2dEf0yxGcv;h?PfLI zGOn>Tx1Mt>+Lc!Yj+*IM%C>{w+8=i5c%T7%8BGA2X=MLDnI@g?$Q=yW^}kcD*H~V< zo4)?g_cX`$rY=l*A_r3TQBkQMwCs(ai=TmKD6zyVe+SbUPIuY`5v<2PwL2CFTN$rsCwkx{6 zc(M@DjR212njuk`l#uH7z9chj2ea&*6Vg`%>1R`iMUBai(MFIP*ta1P1jcs5LB-S7 z+92)(Zy$s~-4Gz3tvE%v@18h{^t^~>oh!xyI8GY9#&YpCe};7t+b><jN{Yh z_L-oKq4%|{3CQgZEPuYrdX1PbIhhvEX5I<5i)#8jlzCmCUGZ#*=b-y~W76YQ)EcoU z*^O3w!);1TM}4dpu?(9rrpx2e(I|ePLpiv^A) z_bu4^ge{|Y+RNDTxUg&zAIRxk($z4d8&#&Ns45D_DhT%xt1XPmuRjmxsLF5_r88+4 zDc`AfPd3f^suzwRpA}$I3UO8EzARMyJo?cSt6S4)?& zW>9)E&P+l*huinn9q#92c7+HE`To3TmMij?*vVlbqLCOt94eye|UE+PxZ2ru^r4Qex#l50t+-%87+RZA^*1swZ9Pj*XZMswa znP@!Mj82C*K#JZQ8g-SR(cj`j;ABNjZ*Ic9^|>NGoXQ0PFKfqYo`TAN)}MPhDW1#A zQs8@dL(8QrBTpEJOhrq4eBw(M^2%T!b-7;iwSGhyD{awxpqh7_vCreR+LRbAq6 zK)5DHD)rrT%7v}aPr$Z{{BK+RiL?04=X{ct?8e79Gnvl(+UoUPcxH%*To^cA?9S!x zuoj1vfz{wKFBNv|D^Y~gl<}AKcatT_cyza=37t${o94P<_k~8(>aC6j&t?{T4a569 zpE(%V()1CsqYW|O+)Nd(%Z&V7x@e&4pj8R#QTc31v~QNVY>nmydOMdsj4Pqi9c8GM z1!ma~_#?pe?0;_o1T%%#%hU$_#@+GYZ3@nO(V2*Isw+mf%WP`7yVSDoJ_WPT`BvIT z$1A|-;PDS`I#8CK@PAOBOI8p@oWTY?zAB6%_@a}}fBNWb6Q>Hxf0LFEWmD{*U0wdT zt>GY`+<)jI9~JR6V3z#5>rsr7jdM-m6%4I$px_x4CRhwNSAC!Azxnoo)=+!&mrIts z+rbGzb95&wR#hA;_3lr5RN$x&`bS<_J`WBcuMv}qADxy{?q;_im6})8pG^K5x7$*M zj<6vyFMe$87wzuwyP@(t>L)AX?NOn+05SSU{rz}>nCvgZUC`%Z8JLum&zq8+J!LR75 z7vy-rhNO-;cdcbNt>(_c9v9?)*&P_uroBo(P09H=9#T~dICUm`*+!{~S>gT}O}8eh zjE;N`s^KoJBZa#RU9x(BJX_aoQBskf*-w2-j(?D}2tk=7(7VnGRT~u*V6oLTh?v5)Zn)ACClA~XPe7)Mmla%R9QGMdNR~~_|8zZ zK}Cx7lODsQG6xn#dVtkA3(>+Xs zAX*EnR3Ly?O%+LaRX?lLyazu}BT)IrIKidvRErg`=(f<-a%t8R&R$(`{Y{%m$?3-I zXnZUI!}0e9v6X*#vgy6IMfkB_=-CHethXDuLmNogr0EdhOehA{FBo(B2=^z2xJiEG z-~PTdNgW|5#wwZtoHgN6&`{FO^xOl)CsiQIqy*W3eYHN}FIOS{4PD(<+Njen6pvuL z<=!p{+(g_<7({5FtGZS(LOE5n7u=Qz;*>@nvl-6o&p9m36I=F!s1$n)=3H7?fOy z*C7nKPL%#u1`WtOceBcK&I}9>Mx(SCD;vS=;dRKqsiHaS;CZ^l1Zg@}ti-F9yk1Qn zmO0vY9ALrtjec3?tmO@dVw_hkL5H(YSB^Y|!|)<)raBg;&W9Szvm*i3a@g+KU)wJz z$i)wfuh(!5v{atq3B8l3izFghsOKwSBQ6*4y~y&RMT%GhX--6I^WgWH@nz0$oPc{n=%lA<%oh|EXbMhYr+=6u@Pyo{#mH8na@ z!bhxIKZ}SKn^VoY-1o1O6p}C3PMb?;Sj#+;AldFVT0eWG_}V8;rQeD=^)$F(Q*ofRl6YbXshOgro_K39^Jcus!WGq}P&5zkt9! z2<#B`4NUG0P4h_$qAy(73o-}2h(EIMWi#+K2yP8_CN1skv_Yau7Ict7_i%hua`F!u zOnEvdcKX9;22lJ(0$OUA#3a^yPQzjzv#DYN;G)O_{}012S*1)|199TmBDvZS>}j z+|G^uIQ8#&IEf>Ls%RM)W|7%GhVgZ=5nl=_O{qL>I1?8RaW&X$%~Q+WG&72=jOIP_EW2{mnKK;5ly{ao5Hu znfO5QzxU({VB)pU8UO}Zi(-5bC1BwII_z74gm?JNP|`#x3EB@dN@E&BY(7Pwvrh%&MqdVQPWkh&;DwxRi;Wx9gTfMgIY$^aw8vhk`6 zRfZ=IlbkQons7`;DWNo~F31qb@K+>PGIFdaQE5Y=lW%$6T$B4}OS)apC^rcn>2yx2`1t=Z!r|v?IjuBne z;OhXUS{!XvhonH==dzGIpn`k-7uf+@<0sFb$@um>meaKwt=f*FanuI>$0e$7BuzUA z_WpPT{Ehb99j1?Oj`|u$r5v&PrYPLwbzhc*<%BkxH2rY2U;U!c={|A${EQcc!H&42 zQ*CD6apSn~`f?F^O1P}|z8nG8adK3<*|jV#2?YSNDzSTiZ_!jSG>6WqgLF=&9Yzxn z#6HBLK)BLIwd&1%^In=7WwN*bw0^XLSqcXwZ&T>!|X1mK03d*4`^c?Mg77 zT6@^)xv74};6PerwNJ4yC8mcGqoIP*YOUAr&GPYz$@9t&gY_t<8|$vEA9AV z^K9I6W2i`T-(h1Jv5%#`wpU)3BT`w%$Uqv;oV5%%HeJ`8yryjje!m7Z8ClTVOir5U z_C)K|-otYX0Zz-_-3%Uug%YwG7AH~qSge@*<5}HD%aQi|dSr{9XfBq)#T4bDp@i`}$0TJEm^FwYgQ! zL3Pr*=CcHWuvvBI*wiI}vG2P5HCsvrIxZ!i&tUe!UA^lB;*?gS7pL%L3cr<1Q%{XC zW6KTW{2iOI0c9Q{+iC_C8^m*C-UHrL4+87K0x6i2+8;p#ROh))K4nK20;z?;k=85!0 zO^FXXst{WS5*U+8hPe{$yIDgkE<4&y7U2>{+P_*T*>Pu_k$+g^wPiV|`y5#0vFDWh zc@7!~YErDsEQ`+>`) zIsaw8cTcvdJk*HcpS+YM+X_NA{S4T{j1+R;qt=8Rub^a236XXeCG7+d2HHDv{>rp{ z_SZ`gbtAfBBc0C=)k^l6VEVfjl97xMT!D9XM6}z19^#lbY4v99jz~lHTQjK<&FL|< zwV>i{#@U^VGz#$EpX{UoErd?>bbwKq&6vUW#{_%z$>9FvS45F%I3Jj>HgZYQ!-mu3 zqg;v3LpDBMqHpHufRHn9$n%ar9Np-)Y6h8JO{{u6-r$XvN6(JGu^;6I@L57Q?gm{i z>AsL=f#iiv{U!o;VT+nuwXb{fdA{TAJ<8>$()XtbgI-#oi4!$A)Tr;}4f^G~j)rNp*HEkhd8JDDnb{8w`T+mW=p|^_`zFK@?w(*{0ubx(P zK*ZW!4+)jV>WqSyV+6vQ&IAh2UR-vwSbVHkD$s(_{jfkAM%``PoS&a%l28xe>)7AI zTvdp@V23hBm3Vu6P1WO6-vc*`wSG1TD64&L&Fk$#~{?&d{M|B&~y|hU9+IFvH-SYPKT0*wh6p-+J== zyNm2yt@CbZBfw=pxMfqYf%idaFxfFGbRlK(VY^tK;V+<(4k<8fuNAP@c3u z@XaPm^e}oNBqMdVDAz&g1~c(t2y*%`Y=-14wce!RTh2_=k;g*W)95*s@C3EL^H~N? zMWp`y%<0>rS1lzzm*HB!XvxVL>L6qY!O!{%>q|%Cj65vY1MIom{jezWnrmYwbKTb` z{Vn32wWrM%ykZoFUUcaTc3Mffw{)o>AT1%1()C@(=Y5~~ zt(jRfYu5bp{ipOf=RWtnuf6wm?RVXs5qJs_g1nqcR2k~K+6^Ypvo%5^pC3gv?0??5 zCRVHBEAA|mBFI$KH-?tPa!+skh3M3~JV%lJu#*RCo$tr~gpvJxUw!9Zr>AaRpwWJ3 z8A0(F{^XARJ=fH`*(rJARR%CocKBs_L22Ybz|aS@)i`yFho7>??%!it3KPrzU?ZY4 zksT>Oz5eziHR&Xau=4%g8|A;^ZdNtQVV0B_ayT;VYAWeYmkHL12HGSB2QFOAa~=-U z3o@W;-D6>H65lMsEZJ?07im(NFLPge#yR;gtJzKHNjrDbOL8VQ3b6<~y!7w)_h>bD z5&#b!lh|Eprg47uF5&Ds^t|{^w;VGW$IH^}+@Vblh5`M(dpgXeWAdnsIU|r)6bXLA zbF51dBjSM%q2+5X14l;gy@G~`{w&Yq8m5MmHu)E)Lz-xVbADfg()}^WrFq)}sJ@R& zM{os)EB==Yplt4CU#fPOxjGgqJx)|6skgW+uoP=p5>v_HaQ|Lmntr^T>Gix;GQ7n< z)q;e=5j4Y@95p{}?x1q$DOGvCVcj$pki(zVNw|!+X`?zv_spf%lJG9A^1G>Qa|h-g z&BJiq$p?&X4^yihxt zv3YE)_=d3G+YVYgd-IQZhn#Zy)(*x_wgS+ISs7fO3h&G}S#ni?zShE z;Z!vC8;5tz zd*0IK9F%QM=>_Fp3zMHC3NE2d&CDj(DW+BT$jhMNXwwcpC#og;|Q%_ zBkX(CAF5u&`BakkSih(Yt?rjOgPwqaki4RSQ(PapWu*W3p+PksWLYJ^b)tb;VZ0b(zbUl>HN_593w! zb+sX*$Kqkk52qx}2=1Y2Swo-BFJ26vJf`&hS+!Y*>_>MBufIFtMBVyGo+9F%w5~7q|q-*_|_!L-a4rjYG}Rm zPT_vp+d`X+gp9dePAO|m84eCFj%st;l&wHsWu0}Hn)S19kX%eu1B`oN8tN`3dB;_O zX3*JgD*Np|!*AdP^K#NxlxBP%7%HzhJz@9yoXcH!t?1NE6^onOq}XjWJ-aZ3Sy_sL zoAgCO{}X=ghhJA}LpaA@-3xT8iQk?8y(PGMxE9b=-Xu z_vnO-^NbSLbH)@}?LuvGI5^zN+0frjv2uPU`&6EWXTt1M&X#^X=7^yS&vucT#I={ zVa4u+|3FY>N}9#_`%v1qQ)b=E)sg_i&QX|~y>Q)_$DPF2v-E?chd2iX-LJhVrde9qm7xQU+}P&VEeL z#Vvyo7IaQxMp-M473+gz6AgEy>mC4Zkoh}r>hIu3R(E32!Xl4ej(=y#vm-;U@rTnp z|Bk=_e26D^FdPi)=|NOrp2sj{%huRY5g#>>M{W6HV;NJ_PI735nLH@l1!#sb7ZvXr3 z|GR#AMFKd`0H42nw4@>uFY-Sx2|e=PXSTvcz$hu$`(Z6i^|2MQeCVXXU-<9!X01^F zGrqKWtWe9SXb$>H1%D&$yb#yE3{IflKU6RdYqzTDtlx?0hu49DQ~I)7$Dh*1<28iy zc1J-1wIAph?0w8Uv;DI&oX=cwWfFeKDWK9_6BwLm))gIn2>Gej>X(y6fIozWM}cSb8$Lf&KjK+^UC651-Q6>9B$z^ zwo;l-mttw*$2UQS-a>W+H+$93<^FUR2(g)hj^IKJm#L>+@Q;ur>+j*vPZHsdbV_W! zYq~hwq}F$odOZsU|l_XR-s`)V*TCK6_u(sfauoBXO>LPL4Ifk|C%w@I@0-g8Dfu;ysjY+qXNYX zS(bu?Z#QqG+w$9e7o?}vfwVtp7bOvra?L~_Zpjz*fln$; zAl#WJdw-^-9KHtqWOSYNgS?^glwSrYLxwMk>o#he&i6`H=X4vFlJy!78aB_)51NdC z6w_Q~QAur1+YRFJyjojX@pPgF2)VDiW>G-6b|NoLw%gy=OEBt-j?vk5#v>f8V@NzA zU$22YJhj&g^Papy%%=MkmlMZH<@G4GsH`@zNQRPoUFZ0zU8A9B|Oac)pd8 zdAeA)+32y9q{HyEowVBit}_JfF*uK#RNKYeT6-&TFtrQ)^&S^z2YHVC-n;2DQ&9YM zM<*z}UQk>Zyf~Y=ND{36c8J7Aops$l_xse7&CE{^9RF-CRw+g+wIIfjYr3?#24JoXh? zUSVj--G-L@4_-uJ#~Ut9%A;2AUl^A2T)FJm=NXjACEgRge^-VQrw@BuC@E3?+m+M@ zg%M!2%lR?wJW2QxVgmU@Quh3_N6?8x??^5@_gIWmsFzm1P8$$4n#9^7SwR1XZOLxhp}5jF?}~b#x-#%rTCZ!VNd#rAOueJV zUdT%^3}>K``>Jdk?m~X=<`M)|0v-Q>uHQhhv#cj7a z-Cha_1`-Qih%_BVv2`+)tZ#ZQi!ll8^+rd;XPrR1*%0@Q%VhD>6ddePuf$xq1760f znpS_fG20T|sH0ip2rt?S@!#$4Q3wg{wzcv5Oo)1-F&sA;Hy>iKA{&@{<@{ZdOePg+ zQBu*h6~#e6g^6;NYinz*rVF?a`+Ur*RRh}RU$pc~m-|4Hqe)r5>l}#(t#s&79Yj|d zK(Ob|6b02)0$Itybdi|bPruEo8QOjNV%zX~9Jam|wB$ikk&B&_ruNtl{Yvv6XqU>e zOst0Dxhlu!6>cAE90t#&Jt<+sc0qM=nQsrffGks$r&kgz?8{oPSn-y&SlSuReKFOd z;$O?Rqz&~I7QC*7{>B<<>5`!~ou=alT3bG$63(YLmoo%R+e0(Y{}c!>!R8!vgVYvc zA?AJDLU*jc=cn5rBfIsN2Ra=)-g{qkROez9Zgt;i659q?9rfuD{9(?Tqz=ZugrDkpkVON-eXVhjSsHJ38?QFdWi#s11T|JGK#u zoWkV}80W~lQfF#>gJeuKDy`d{DlG(U2X|L{klW3gK&*mstAnE69y*+joQCB{VU?bj z>G0&lxk*LA!6J!kzU$vl@g09s)=6xw{8XYI{tKYNZO^4|) zuc1_2#L5s!c`$rJGRG8R7`W=pe8bwvT0{jqEMEF@2{7>Ywc6XH)aIJs#~>H(STwCf zLcg4jVbAU_GiQu?*tY&tk3If5d8Fc4T^o^Dx9v`Fpq$N0d@7}HlHY3EkpJMvP9jE0 zeI+w=d@Osiwxr91$E;JzHgEq~heKKqV7s)wqf^Fz#JCnzj7011!dgo68zh;$e4U}R z7q-x-;@~P&BMj?yiEEq3CD8fDdq-ul%&||qn)N5=7^#+?KKFHn==S;cT@}jl(rO+@ z7SrZDrqiJiN!b@P`6L3iQ}LDc5Li5OzF+l?)%Ox@<0hV8NJuxXU3m8AvTZmfzo`an zhr5Nd&))QmIKn4vRtfnuLSm~O>5B18zTe`%TtMf|$kP$ez^>hoe@2vdS*&^Ir_m;e zMCSs@VJ-~8FA}b+h(1yWJCw-~~lqxWL? zw-4hqKFsnQx3fsLVE4JuOLgxv9E;pFqQBSdmLFS5-yL zP#>fzQh&?R!6b?KRZ>UP%0o7ynx#DRmD!y}&}xWOfxhKXADE7;I|x0w!T+c89)<@w zLGKQ&hEUrJ=uDg!AiypTwjN5a-W!ke)0kDvNx6Ci$KiD^I}xKEzgWj2=49Pgiu#mi zG|~hw#-cN_-6X3Y-tCK}LPciMSY~=9$Av}Eg?H~qMH&VZ*2yhBNQqptqJ+80Z|~)H zP={Ag>M_xo51USGAN_XlshbbyNSoKk-SBdb9)DPdIpX4kG0B)sDA~Q?%T_x{;o&&; zVZtI^!+=$-Zmc82^ywSJtO*r!i~eQFgPU6P3HiFhvg+3_cafi0anRNIJuti$N;IwK z(2#VK)!uN;3q}=;ADU6U!DGrwexUuZgDIGUB4rwTg3WPQeGb6gFymhoD;Twl*KG+M z7>S2!?L3x)ZacCWff}BR*BK%Ghu63ng|EGQq)ffTC}aUsZ_B~wgpOO5RWSFhL6tll zh8vI%(CQOG7;bmDF)Kt3>sI(`Se7CkU$u-5L%$S5V@GjdVboq&Sl{zd=BZTTK{$?) zj^Fif6r9od5*Met(!K^=r6@ck!Kp_j}tK8i15wG=t|%` zB%_iVoyDruiz~Q_8oc)Lgx7vbRJ@a<15`s%6*HqIdSTntBZu{txqMMPsVFcF3V%VF zloEG8iW2$JOp5&?H_x#*p0hHF$&4U$IYau;_P~BtfY3;g>(ZA(cADl^+dRBc^N8$@ zG*cUa-EGF?LpLyG0krRZlgnPl+I_tVoCFtkowB13ikUpjQLMkaJWd!dlBP%nV z%xPFxQWWmgKs>?RL`HbBI=@i%vs#%H=eh2V6mFw(N}7g4_FMW7MRbF*UkKf=1^~#p zHFSLl*$|p%$`lZE6Tw}JGsv=mTDxc_@=)_O^8j zau#E#KA^yqiP)YcN~MsCv@hgk(g&geFB=q}V|e=Q1yT6+5M;?!(_Eh}x|FCjzM9Hw zf|h<`p2Z=Q-R`}AyvF5Xe?vzRwCr@W{0g~Y(>YhBy0iUBlgA`CUFzEXiy7bE&{~Cd z+sAF)%(mUcdmZQ*wQuXw*IMZ=-l4(3pUX1R!ao;1_eijfPUoo~r&UG1%~0VBZYT~~ z`m>vP;hFlraPE;D@)DFc%OI6bwzaW^8_(D95GsKU0Q?jSWH(mb*J>}FE)q!+NLzc{ZYqsIRd209`GAOtK4KmFo6B$e$;jjXRr+!<$rtu4f!!tZa{N5I{ z;4{`7_%@YDWtum=4V>Is9)Fx)iFzf2+V;G7f_(D)R_J0FO6)7sV5{T);P2< z?dsGR0xrda--|NHT)A433uA;9ijr8W-KW-uXgV9%h-kFp=tJ&hfw|_*we75zt%nxB z+9?#?t8U-QrqAFeeiZPW0CnrT9Uy{yV^dKszGGFPH%BlED|7$K2DzH}FfaatJ8v7c zkz%2Kt>~R5b!v*Qa3h4L6R=O9;Y^A?`N~<{Ghvy@^*dWlRmhvcUl^GR2K^SK#9Vqz zgdtuX8g?zb&e&yMgmvj$wJ_4jIO%KQNyzQft15%G{wFQoPoH_OX=Q#GoG`uxz4!<4 zv!D;WT`*v6&ELU;N9=AyY7+P5Pd3&(siq{er2s{jJ_!oxzhl*hGLFjiZ+%dKEy|K5 zSnWGY*L3#Vp?tDkIqahq0!U1eGA!Gr`Mw`LWg`FzM~qicy$uPwMf-)m4COj$*!0?j z$qi=K+WBS4I zQYBZKrPqXKJa=!Ot*U+H!Dz|PfHNh<${5DO38Kcw-s<7_-TJ;uNCc+D)odO4<8zD7 zhhDd0bKZigB!n&FSpdG{<}6<)+Zn7*DF*wRC8`whJ18rhH27TE)~>~>Y(2^xs69R~ zv+45-C>_t?Pb3-jEJUj=eiKxYH)ScOTs2`qXGIw{C+=C+V1()D5xN2h?ik*-b11J| zez`;Y{dBq?*Es4;s4af>y=>c}5wK7ZWhz2R?)ZV1`xMGzWYmC6r>ND?n+_^Hl}g(i z_cD;`IsN;PfpuQe6^}8)^1MiHXI95RDAuQ)2tN*fNP{T>2~TN$Y~6o)zwQA6oiKsX z3S_RcC2(GS%5JTJ7b>MxoAe5eKGil(c2r=T<^|L|P3sonY(FYv#rA)&s!MR&ht;zC zuihENd+rUz*f>d|Uj@V{md~{8$2Kf9h>Zg>8rL#=k$pl#!1>hjwOhVt2abu1l1&(q zPQ~_U=DFaMbKzguqg(bj{j~yH*AJp@uP~7;GnwOR?ZGWbE`W`}g0$O0);GiiE9iiO!*y4=O@n_6hE!3aLYG>o1S(rCgZzu=FcL{E6GI*?`+O>V87D^$-{Wa5QUki85IOdT8GbfS9Wet_@mB9z%XDVhuYN}4EfPncu*Tz>bJ9Gdh#<4NF3;&j%COKTg=86HYr|ab(x1BFVOYG|&OrzF&&ShBW}eP3ElqHRNW4n@J(&`2oc!U?iUXCX!LUj% z_Kodt!}Qf&dz{a*qR+^i7%c?tnb)oB-TG@q8b;XtuS%5+josUOL_s!NF|~O)$itZ; zhEava&<2kTM~pDX9CwziTU+uOt$$X~yJB(RJsACB1N*12#3Hq#mPx$sK#<$8}r%dxi_fJ7cE(o3FRY)aHz zq#G|=0mb`6Lt%cUilM%JX$X1%eQtbp0ZLLX-7nqLl4!$_;%^%QnW;$?w>qZHt@pr|aL zdu}YrJh1rno}`DdRg&1+ToqXatL&fJPpofxM5VV^=VAkK4BVEI2z2PKcQrIl%HZeJ zUVVaW5QRDum^}4cXpKr%p7;)?3L4oZ7FSCxTxrysD~Q=%)d^gqFJZR-{VWKG;|?@p z==lHy8slr-*ow#TC-Zp>j7Ir-HH7{dK)(#<@77ye#g*Tc<~3yA65T%C!feCEdLVgz zxWEHRu(ZjA0)Ka_(%Z=DF%_Doo`ZFE`6Ents}K8Q^s-ARkqSIVkkJ;KWcN zHQxaco^CDT-XzDI%Kx~h`sqT?sBTd8v=a#T0^=%md=O*+544c$!T36J&bx-U*(!gj zT&lbO1WklIDQ)<=6SzBg`vRUhUqcYU3uNl!&Jlu(H|uwS03;k0->Cgn0$731^WNNT zAQ@mvsGw;(&ZwT~PWN?2pVOz3r)Qf!O|$;^JK`e0Wil(?VwA})vZ5b)0y zzR{tyhewmx%7CDQ^WtA&W0(_>Fv4#*PTEx=Fk;;HV?U6BAAmaCU&)Di4Y$2!`8C)@ z7Gr=3>|*eEKfWC!zS9j)W>Uw{?J>ap87K$$r=F{w-beVs<$+fx)0^IZDa%stJr1@l z04RBVe&|S;yI<=))j9IE{4SRL7Hme(dGgG|9-T&5p%L}x$G;RVzZg4!s~3RN3PyBZ ztm!n>!iO{AEfJmn3cM&n;VAPoR4g_e&PP10?oShX0>x~0ZQON*d6PDdjw(1OMfgiA zMwBS_>SoS}Hd6!}qco&xR?aL#u~6!y^TN(FQ$#3dE=WxH;>Kj?DZ4N^YCS z=O{w&UWbxaZM?I_4!j&R2Fje}fm}ClNvoh8T3fgNOn10veK74Zb5HEI6Cf4n?@Edk z)Ee1ZE(I*1!044o8bNpIa}4mI$E_S|s|A@BR1-#Sz&*J^sFK8@XIqY0u?w76i)^QNhi2E% zvfjE`qyZaYFU|9PARkGE`DR)ZRp!uct>z}Y@k~9OIT~=8y+`uswOOdlXL}&QIlb47 zS9)OV?sHd)3o~c4Tgoq&0pK7~0psZ`wx_QZg4Oe98@A*RDL)yfC~G{k`2(7VI8+HD z(@t9Jwkn>1ex5t0@Gv--Fl?}gv$@388U#3DDsYHo;I{~3#-nZp)+3nln@{gbwV)6kYl`;NpF>m(nw;tQuyei`=TR3u;nLMRG>HJ zh1B~&*zwX90~w0XS8hnkWUO4NWbe_#xamhC&A&?PdR^j)5y4N6`xr9G=Pxw!M#v0W z94=WTMwT3sixi5hMa5FYZowj=G$1^#MqT%!BB4ChSzLKFX%TIKPU-s7J`H&ey)_46xu$OUJ zu`|(cC>aTG7V|IdS+rDGk6IC>^RGnRW^;>?*q=o=LznvvC5_bsCrO7N^<ER>RCNM(;xtr=6yYlcqm6rX(|d_VL(E!5rOH7iSDat!c4V{gl+s zg!NIn9L4y1#ii5Hb`S~=6ityR!0?~GN6~cH^WlRwFrF-+CQKRIhlq-6z|i&bh7rAy zxW3okm-3$%uvawuU%9WY9ytvRlU#V~87B5DdNQ9NRu`?Bd<=uCyKZ*1MYrDXXu;g<$PMO^dh`|{w!533OOF3E zc3v1f9Z6|yw;YKjGa}F2CYMf%3mM$H6yE^X2$YchTM`F8@qc|H0Z5!qoh-<8xRh{aLCYym&&MPoGdU8z{=VMaOqo zwt35O49zTe5mc&#cm|CiuOKU3w&<3`k}Gc$ z5klH9QC^8nKuEeMA5^sb(UDp!L zoU1~|CQ6K3xcA&WdG4%c&?|aSg)tfDP=LJWzOJH*JMTY-9sl3M?k5U%tX3$^()iR@ zrl9h1kH=4+pTSw$qTRU=!bRt`N2)u58PcNvTHK946V%Hih-{csjW6Y`%hH>tPyW8t z2I(wQMcXMo%P=fR%EG>OH6OTB^if9sQz(X$GGc;o*8x)OtGSkXB9qLzaqOBgeBh+a zqPlBZeiaw|Wz@Y$DaP^esEKKBie#%MVV(6MV32y7us{FCs;Jv_th%*c~#i`$m3^nX8Co zAO8x15_sK7;wMNVAFv*P;2TE%;5Bcs+ui*{ehFD@VkdW)`dJHmvI~qxhr=u)u33_F zaN?%_C;neZIe#OX{>#2^MC#d%(=R(LPtfQvc4~T*;%WQvI!>dJrZL7rCgG$kB&pIK zM*^)F?9&8?xI|w-zP{`n7{)p9mX$N>+0}ZhyM(cb)Ju{XUl^U%V&LV+nc_p313y?c&GkP{moh$=oL+GP7*psc47^q1) z0DsdKh@|r%umMn`Wm@2`E_rrg)1qGw1p_j_vSat(X;n^Ky?V=)1l{5G*f)xU`;(;A zz%3a;;qdI42{3<27~G3o0au9{4?B45KYh{8=XW>#yB4!E|DoghtD%tpYT#l(XTF4- zQCi;VfZOo#&))2eI+_5t)62V3N4Gow@)2MC5Ey=`}%$!mh3nuy{}RgH$rLGP8aDjZb-oj$-?+{u`vlWwC-F+TZ-p_-YPZjvaNLe+ zmdMm8Dx|Wh7UCL#sZe6d^20%j}YwpW;4uj?E!582FWCkKo4RZy@c&(e+%1?nB$ckz*B%g|9 z5-mE9Q!QwHB_meCP2=U<0buJE3%Z^#hy6Z*K?=K}PFMrF!nBSR$lS?;sprH&M$ke- zVxSm7Xx>=N3wj} z)4o(b;c~J5ODwjI-LG3YO6&b|#)B8^Llec}-mI_{WX!9Y|1G%K|GH?h`d$7eZ~K}S14jQ#vpZyq zU1!3>V$Ul#@Fym>@d6Icy($sc*!MoDu+*=hV2{<*t!jVutR*&Jm@5OU4!K z7?(*qks@PJ1JCV_AdO578SFYc|r5$|}^HKG|gHyRf$~Lod3Y^}kMx5|A!kvZ3b64es zWm_u(;f&NU*0Pk;YR(B&vc6B5AMz8tF}`)2?mQYUC{dS$ZFTSaP0K3jh>{`cgO{PFMFrkg(n!I%UH0oU6skFM&q%&w63-2qd=U=``hJ5K zbNs7co(G$9qIDdtI8qBkohi1DQ_sJBSD>KPqo|?tUWRC#yPjwvLsCd*^5%7zXc+`$ zRCS2&c%JFk?)!KbB6$uQf~VTxEedo;Xr-7piw#}j^v1@hqvCHY_Zg{8FL+ zim~?o-~N>3zicoo#Tji`{{n16V3+}8*}DlVU5AFf0m&2FoVRmuAk;&uMI{`zVg1N= z;dOWt{zKWUY>r#yM8PXepA$NlfccN<4IkqVmDS&8{tt)q2mgO~BEj<5tCx^XIx%y(W>pL(5&u+e8y)yB7l6=JtM{G!!)wD3w;JFlzG)eJ z_iE4{ft$A*jr*7JQcdNZ15JfS$Yu|Pp&K;ebIn;0j!I^O}<|7|JYv9fGg<(I&lYaSZ%ct&p@j@;ImCc*2$ly5wWNL z^d||I;}D8%q8Sp47ckdTUbPmYD-9rJ#j90XOiFILJx+lEN%TnH$a*Ldy91+TJYW}B zRhTcS+dwp}9HYx#e}>g0_QoKRA%x(PX8ikuVVPF_7hfI#m)Bs8Yj^3L{=VSXg>U*n&I)8Q#3v*Wd(K(8Ey>O9zO9)V%-X`{*G*RV&?EKSfh3b&DFG|Zl!yj)oi zh6e9rkaGGgC9e-Q?Ie}bdv3L)#;8diErv+`$>Q-^RZgVR4*Z7JgeR%n*l|=3MiCF( z0eDux_Qj7Z4kF$%AWQl|E9$gV>b$xO88h6Fg;OnB`Q3&?F@fyMJP5LNFy)7B?HBNB zK$rskzUhrve7=-=KPCrT-UZ?~IV?jWe!y-*Fr1ECGJRH9+hzwH2&UtI{N z3G)Js;BghYC#VX?t&vz4ymGGH>EQrj_Bc$<)8C!>4CXiQ0Ex4oq+|FHjweLN1Pj9` z*WdJ@7GiHlP?RQXV{P)1w6pgSNyl~Ft|y4<(aOd7=7q{!o?q2M-VrEQZ*dxilU~O< zo_rj*h2Qkm6wnsbt{c!XIBt`jATS^*Got^rgAxXpW3ju#aBD=|2ZWEgdkj9=-1Nr% zPo-Io*5ANKi}+^@0KME-Xc{tiR-3BrzB{_|@Msr!s?HoFXlQ##^+wJLcpznRfra|G zE;e2Y?0z0#JNgH<5awfr&XEzqD?hdaBhsB-ys!fjT7mv);P}#?G4Raw!|$t?T`n{s zpNF#f7Nisb>{y3bs2>zf;|v@$^3JZN-*x@|Nzp3Sit6&pcf2r-YiZ>r3vo+2+9 z+v&{3`N5}ehEMRGeFAUM^;8xa(KU9Z2MsU%5y}$^K@TuST4M^NtU5H+!rmbxlrK-q zNTb2a95?~Mh;0o_e>a18K8cC0@aj6Pi z=7fPSYv4NG`U=o3N4&*ygNn|8fh}1sW}^SDq4UIJ1nw${!h(lHq`&;=xLM5J&lJVM zhgjm#R#cZd1(tX-kVECqwLdr&;2orbX;X+VQ7hFR03EvujULrUtm||qofH;dfzS_` zizubhB2M@PY-mcoCuZ*>IK==}RUnhkTZ3B`lVU!FXGLl)0m1e9=JTI1-hXo3c7M8A zTlA&QG5A9^a9Vv|r_8!Fr*Pkdn%9~ZuMFofnTCNnTIK52T$|7S$INXOD)!*CbQERU zuU*(=h#U4AyDX+;WNauNdAfv0rOrCMIXdq(MTy&uVI5v!UVl^+&}1U-vn)1~h0zly zf;*Rd`*e<2G3*EL8|zRBTQ=hbV^~;0-nvPq_4W;WUp;@oei~DZdX{6NRsCcIN5%6l z>5Dj0ZgaHmEbYF>>mHG=Jr%dgt<`zbmeJ*f!zIrCjKcQoz`rwPNBsxIgBqVM9RFoO zS3_-Cl148$WqEvlz`Z%VDY5@Vf%LM1Q8WG2#{=-W;cK**cU@b?&CBw^Au#Cc&N6iG zqS^y|p1dM1WSi}a`^HB%&>S%evZ;R`km)2QWXnX047}_-E*1Q;19XngvOob(2-T8% z*J@ymv*d~ZZ$uBBp{ZfNXBD_GF_{LHtz-V^(bwbTw+j}JB3e4 zUS8^4=blseR8aUkH=myNo`H%;U~Yt*4zmG0<}_i!V`8)p=_i*y;{-G4dXl883evbL zmb3At>I317;emSkS!rb;Zp?ou*$-P&mGz~Q_B+9Zy<|JlTHmG61~Ly@u}|WfoF0sS zgeZr#)}70R6!#H)19R?c;Apg4?m1QJe<*(?A@Rp;pisw2jZ?bd$dKFor>c-MzH3r% zs?~b$XcrhSiSy5cU~TX;1l^S{$uZ1$so8G)yo;EAOsd^)5pm6_71meg0a%p%AZ5RgxuCZZ5b= zKprqC=5@C@4}ikd!DpIH<0dbd1}(ZjL&Uv1`%qX5vuKI&FfT5#W%{?`W~M4 zjR7rBH!qO&GM3r1rrM`NMtYae1|bf+O_cEy!$w!(pY?2pQthiO40LQ?DNacwa9n65 z+y$9o1^SSPu>EBFdXq?R@C6p?2~gb)@~E}VIXN1$KctK$jRkWI(@@+5I=nHk8U!yD z-6?nClWDa$MQY_#VGF)jjMp`$?pJm1nXof$N!JTAwbUaLno@+(dWS6xlfUU7w)YA? zotGuxQA96o>){KUyNg!tr_$nz7%LWtNt?>Is9KRX^+NR%r-8*_p4pn^Ra<;oH7m|d<{(wF(^D0L(+n%Vo87Ckho@c zC*v(j@)O0&oq~-@Qr`UYfr%fx{<{{o z6!l*@F}Df?U&6ZIg)MFkN7fr_K}_*}0e)h!bzbL`^|*5~7{V5;DKx3_s2q;+@3*J@ zeiy}Y-(erM%AF8dyOiwgA@{?6Yd}?f6FhIWYKNujcO-RIO{v!jAKoO5;S{~PG>8~= z_Ot7(%9%}NH5#u}Jf2Mw%$mzJb048MX=*lj0FT;TH5o0HYhmIyC|R9u^Lanlf%JP? ziAD2+lXGYm^YD{1Xr|>fZ(Jx@DW+w6F=#BQox1x%4gn1X$pzt$J<1r#zKXesd+#P6 zNjVzdxvimO0!>O>u2aet$zC>9e7>NZWe&}bD%1T~Fph81HpL zVGzL*&ye{sJ*XrRy*BX(2(-^nt+ePrefn{)7B{8wTW|gr(VUh$w2@r#28+|P@jDI_ z8btin*pDR;<&OM@$|2x>CJ7G^IfY*w**T5pk_k{dem#Tjy}co<)9M^Z)v1#kM_=b-bLeyG=)1H+&Bzrw629WQt=X^C4{POsu;Q%eux)|7|W2O zv_1E3L?ILh<4Dt=JRU+u$tmPL|7R=m=8bscWe5U_^sdKX&T>RCK=WkB{UV#O!66qS=A@Tw6tJ$R61GC`& z5R8KWDG`g%FYeCcuFh60W}XW(%$~TW#J6nkL5EL0&pMzqBT68;(X6vYC@XQY{?Q1u zsMO!!F9_z{`H&YudR@LANRC+4nk&>YWv3XZt1y3qwM${UOG&TQT(=K8ETmpmYyNHn zj6?Owm@%h81W%nuA7_8B*XUfcCs)jI-~I8ubYa3Of?VqDAKX{m+p;@~Xno7(ErTUA7aucO{`Dn)^t!bkusX4?hS03~h_+n>;u0K@o24;_>cp%$z zEJ@iu)5QC~T)-Dwfw)Uu(|~jCx!3oQrBusSvR^O8V-5L{OCL;PCk`U}Rz%vyi*mMG zLE60C)@C`NF{u0Z@BV#1b8bQa?FnpmLSDyCJuX$m zX$B0+g7mLGMh1c>1kG+MLlsp%zn=LV0ClBy93XW;{J#?CKFUX2k6*b7_u`e+55~=i zYt9~n6mbGFfID|!C~!-*&o6^ZBQ;*v*cGKLyxv7j_37uew;DOTulRPh z9Ot75X1-0sxA472+L~6#2QWNzU62A99w(H@4zmHR40(n(PhXM=VUFYM7y-usS&jj} z9!p!iZv&x&sC@hTW$^#H>LW6F+p_f@Qn>M&lJg@(t~5%da(IWF_D1EkC7^T>CynVa zqOMhMX0KX{RtnK!TaHhl;&!J0^ji3oLB;x;6igva!5U z(el#THFo;oVXW^O7$oT$?XkSpv$N7a5$@Q#;IlgEKAVbAZg4+%6eF<>?~_`zC^vzP zvOCk$_*cvMLrKi+JGe+q5yyztQO&OSkbkWQK~R1C!jd%0B#)f)SJ>RT#Dc&NBTR4o z07WX>ug^Z1gpLE*Ql}`UUvUd}tdi|h58S@+#JbtR|FJzOja`@-YaG-Ms~cKh>eL&0 z{AaT#7!-wC?x#9MwrSzbCgyX?dI6$XdS{W+MWOjTImrJEO&(J$={=dC)Bw3u%;T<6 zWIG_fZZ#e|Z z+~l?BDK$-g!+HC#g;+(Xk4;_kh7iQ`pfV=9Oubs3->y{KvNm&D2=m{aRsSIJ3q?E@ zydFkK)1o?cO}0Y=-Z+NI?mWPKug@(OTJ759+&RI%7df?7-$Z0ZZ4r+1#ya>B4My2p z*@n39UwTm(*)N zf8&0pQ+x`>@DE!XH%=+1fo$@2vnvxUBklD~g!MZbLKtTcqD)#x zJf0fd_PIFl0p}7z1Fp(l`z>Vr0ZCOW{5U~)gd4mGrtI)7Fbh?z8Y5cVKHghQnzP)O zyQFEq z(Z3D$!yYuy>c5xJ_kT#n{~u}O8RTjGmv)xJHgWcY>a9t9!WR`Ci;_3#KXm(lzTmPS zs7S`p-u*C{@DjgyoE#OK+9?#^tqEXh6N4#=Kz4QCzf%=`M{5+u@F8)}n}`vL&cZge z6a7;kbccH!0`sa`+Cnaabg;NWt+_lCHdrJCDV`tS%z_B}TF^Rv)p!dXfgMY34Bjum z19siVZGS_M_scg(&O%&pM^b_k0r59D+zBC-IvwU|A2@;z2X?y|+Mln$$p=a%FPQQP zS}<)p;FgAym94aRfW_)Z>={~myna6IBc|qYRD}22045jVl;I-0!MepM<^}98{HJlp zXo}rhTzn69P06F&1CofvMp_cso;O^9>{7+{HL8Oha{_Li8Q82CewMDH(z`9jLB(FZ zYVs%c6n5Wl0CKFTC^Enu@lF4E)T(ha;M_%$3BEZN0_!D_P!;77!5aNLKB*X+%pU^esm1Z2@8S9#7Rl zOmZhKW@~cm{A6?2?C5lN@Om3ko*YxW#p$(xMY1 z`ywSquhQD_2%*%F;6N~@g?ppl}WjFJ-WLIMO@ za()FrT}H|wv=1ZRKo|k=aZFR$L{>WWw~ki9y)&?y3Ak)b!KZ1txfU-mAPwSBH|u%o z0$=MU>0}k~rW0|&sQR0<1(zpDLTB>T=2EIRHjQ~}a6Tu8AeA9WI{)^N<{=)(dz6Pk z!ZHiURf1f;D#Lgj+YOp=4AM%|9mB3;@Z!NZCtW$ky%(vi%G@=%W6^^zu|^(kW{DxJ}NWN<|qQ3BC5WKD$kP>EY3SkCt$-DH1RY&lQ}GPTzoAb& zP;CLIZ(g6*;07gdWh2y~+aOA&sH}1{0gst<~<~Z9p?hgz;T@L*x7=D_9qfL6byJeuS=4v!FNWl}ikJ)$)GvE9}%EKi4s=&^!UCy1;G z&<@z+j_0x+{j9X|?}m1u)QUH1Lv)iqTCH12DEy}YPv@)BGsOjiZS$Rq9Z|b-C{syJ zX~BBAuaaRsnlDFb6_*x(;{$ysXM3eSc~8`D$h6wa2;4fZc{QB)sW!+&M0W zEl}(7CEw@pEw+Oa>*`66?oLFgM%~Y}C#}4QRq^04%X^6rceMEi-uOSG3JrPR`hMYb zy#em<>0-J?^JWwd$OxqpV8pd$0GXt7{o0l?TSx^Tg>n6<_pTVBi9EaaWSPU;Xt_*A zEVnK!y2~1IJ^=qhZps+N#hQ~?3qDaZi1+1W@_lcrHgt!7r(j(I$c$U2tMUm!ty_MX zmLIO{O5<|{8dG{`WUUC5<+K|IlXwFs?swZb`*XT&pHVlSkx^?MN8bJh+?od%0kuFI^ zX^@g`DFvht-61KBAdR$ygb30d0@5KMNJ;+dc<=k)bKJqW<8U}<@BP(UbIvsv5fp<` z)5f9_+?K?_ZIHih)%B31vjqc(&f3Qx7YnQFsxXF;;Z-c-UszZ>2_Gk7m?lqdZBuO6 z+0ISZ?2NiFed-?^T%SJIc=^)xrN*ZN4UNi6Y_VfhCX`;KDgDOaMl_tOp&``DZG*E8 zvpCwZ&gkXg^i10H%|NQHdu3&sp=%4=FE*KNLdvxR9dBzumd_!LT}b=BJ?G)Wa9udB zkn>(Uq9#(Hm`ow0xTK`d*Xdf7sfFhQ!0UhP=ks1+J_TiPo?K3y1&e~Kpt!XO1M1-P zJ(;>|B^>YM!=r?uc#|jr5Qc}prXD|#ni|H~?I6%|t4%kTdHm*-_%jHJ?&gwvCUOr_ zc9Z50S_jGT)u&ay^RCq+Gv}t8?IMwqz{XycXrz-q%NFk(Xp;5L>k*T;zl^?9unoJb zKeI4DX>{PjER(}*$vPqB4ZmLlvCNp6vF<|FQC-H7qGMUP_2p$<7a;q*nkFBb!Kv^? zO8v%=UUZN?iIEw)^nU5(Noh6dHR8q}2{u2OHNVT!*ZuiH)wNg)Vu1ptIumYcrf*(~ zTonmZ{^v+QD@xRPp!SIflrA9axIPDNByD3&f8~(O?Zh|nQ;2nKpL@>zmOr{^u@3g( zL*9L;S%*1Pjh908fyn^G@sm zf7%$n4b|*ar)LJteeVLZ^+vJ`LT#`zTN-1bVbTR|w@LQLz$?N2=;7*%%P81SBy zbSd&FC@NYwsh%^SS=_3eTgbP}$@@VznB5{DxvsHc@tdVGHYvDWq(CZE@hx84S^xE0 z&I97r3fH*^EpHa;up5pDd|h;WeZ&&X|KhH2@LTo)UrycHC}z&DD`@X`il^h*gAz2? zrgi><1&FdNjO68V(KHaU^~R7$RtAm{CPogeC_BpFhm*SF*l>#Qf*bzP45=784_mLQ zKAzMdq?;yo9KDZkJUT|W1-r-_8go37Uuar-I4?#8g~}Y0VJt8TDS7!^MmHjeKzPPgn2A+~Nu9;@eMH=ryK74W1KNK0rzj__};^Jc-K=c`*vsP(;#GjeHleb-e4^B9Z$#9)jfu)u2~eClO3F5rY_Qi9eA!1#`HQ zu7W(#><@W9|0L}){(jCY>@8NNFq>ig-ut!_WzXTirPtIQE^6)aR_!$AowB&#`_yr6 z^-(aFJdGh|fLSW1QRoKa{-7=(59EY)&h{S^gg$>|j!qEdYUQRGeAb>~#g;GJ=_n!9 z+M$=*+~!C?5h1aH##M<+C&lB7l79QS?i6DnPeKIOVIKFreHaxj@oJ?Ka*>7(x-^iXjdh*!2Y0R5QwO=~)kt5BAh_ zhHJ`3gi0Lx+%9{=WD$yw>|0vpmh!Hz^C_rH;h;}t170NAerjYRkm#0ep+wK}LHc?a zej-kUI8Trq3JuBZaE=!1`nNTPE6ge8y&tc83Z@%J2(CcU`IjCA;p?u>L&q<4@3<-G zU5!#<7P;C@j(1PHh0K90kW6ZpB6*K4M&#b@bPX~dl0-*jk0qD4BDzK`gu#2697Mfs zUg zqI*LygFlqOoNDwZeXy6td53mnJg%WHHE44lU|k+|ypC%R<6Nqj6Wg2R!H(M7a9gg6 zo#FR>NmQFxQT~X1Z0K!3?AF$zZXe}~)Yj$2Pj!&h z)+PXg!Z*L(R1<`7H7s&( zRoW6?RJm+TA$8_68vrR~s!?!i{(>-EOh}oV{N^^POBY>`^Ih<}Zk_pD$*?O=$-Hun zDY_E>zHz}t!2RSDvV-VU$?7_2>~*=lbHQy^g%pkumxvg7+>81s5Oto3IAVI; z)oJ&PvFuzx=1s}G$~x89W1px4s*Ge`%0uQTS{FY0DJJ9 zb&_m72?_a1Nk_Tln-AqWskrT?yfAn^NM8mqi%-QSl z{_wpj^1$9JA;D>J$+M@d1*U#nd{k-)gWn_>-ZYq?qsdPog{uzyOW5R|XpH2=Of!*V zo%Fo1myg-iF@6DffOyva)V?(hk+J}!R^?Z(wdcvY_k?WB*rMk@2?EtIoOT3hef}RW zF!fr%tnl#$Q@6=iQiW@e6>s=k(4zZt*`0}ynYYq$4VpEsw3;-ulNeZkX{7G%{7$Nh zHZUbqo9@&ncwz32mMD68U~p*~+FRf5e9bCZ7Q3}ZrhgHXX1f3xAWML}#8kq+NCmg! zv)q{h?}s0RA`brI&i*D>w_A`f3&=E`V+K@1-ENZ)*|#5)W_>wm-JWXpKb{$i zoinUNyL`{+49fU}bk&oFL z2(+yIo?R}AU7(ldeH>Xo`JuO>SC%2iJlg=S3Y{3YF9DfTL^VRkbT=RXvO0OC>V~@k z7!=vg1|U`#maj4qHuWNxTGjgFsdu-`Irp>&8}okH7ELjWvp^rytO$uWogC{&%HxJ7 z!*4NT!+W-YB)kCoCI5&JC&4&3K;)$MN$g+xmS|t3H7KODGEJlPv}f!#WLJGxyANpv zMZoJ{Jt{eqRUrohyCXzgt-Jl}^AT#tPA^$eOZLGh49JU=&t}AbSagWwX8u5Vsw;3f zNY*075trVQ-jP5<#VsVfS0NXnUulNF-nx^>SYo74JQ--z{QC-};|n4>fShn|&LZJi zWVX%Ivc}Zfrqahq=^XNsCX*y8!rFI)bh1d0$f&+McZjMr26ofSYmI>-%-iT49mwLYW-+ss{Tz;3^RV)a zGLB~@OCDce0se5+Q&QRaW^MDrs}>W^MN}*6Z^yp7xYiB4Xab2BFBKkXi#-lLJt-$vN~^H<#p}jln#jJXzEYlHU8C%E2NXF78yV`9KjWs}N{ ze$c8^Z}LoCgB|1yNV@|-rF#$2@yC!nwb+CZ3Ung0l9CNq&bnqMv7ulE60FLz# z2rhuHtQAstwL!3xjz<#hT@g^mDk=3HHqox$Gl2b+ZQ@PZL}l|G@Cwu4WlwvSM`2t% zvb|Aqo5t1l8SH8qpd3Jlip!);j3<;cC>>U(#%6uA>v-IbQy|n; z5hK%1Hlv~JRM{ezKr|_%p4XO;4&*4-{0a;*!@#sssEiAmkUv*=Rq%V*AoxpT_n;Zy z-P?-+ISk*)7z%G?9lVH43XUTSX-FP?v_v>afa*QM=X+_f7JKwFyS6jr8pp|rNKpdD z^XRt@f=7(3lsF{m-=nS_i&9dLZ<=X;ekRu&!ojm0h9ura;mMEF< zjyHmAMVBZSU4?mwzt8mteq6t6)9*BZe|Y*rx_5s>{Gjeh3Uh`ngMQ;CAy!;Xt52H1 z@Je6WD=-9z!itb_74NLevaa-0@Xc0PzbQkxkadJ9t*3W$RM$RjBWVJGzGrD)AgDkH z9IDg#$w3!gM)+c*f}4W7z2H^dRWyfZfpa$~+|h?W`4Ru(wpaT>X7)OcF_Jo7qndHK zBqhi}%`+#(koxz_->|B?7=M-)7mqqJrkVWNTW(z*Sks-KoYcd=bT!bYWe%eWTANdS znxBGd8SBGPuf^~gYyIalmxZcP`YO|I$?Ch6n|MauT{BJ9Kj~W8RLFF(7(R1Sv$MS; z@Sr-%(bUlB~9lnv5mnSf%wv(*V4}S@7fgfo|v)aS^d)9PMzG+pFwETS$et6uH zvX+$%;$pgf>nHBD$0$|=W&iwv1fua>MMXtE)EI4C5Q* zHzPlL2{RxdV03h}YYM*f@bJ)lF)J&p6<62#f8Iho**$e^{@)Kq^%431@83hLVBA3C z@?T@As;>5eqAXGt<)1M-lqLF~k{3#=tH+Rc;I887$uMf5q4DAVtJ^EhVWuMXVKuhj zrv?UYgKbktNXWv15rw>t4wX<{ZZ77lRjdyAz`%!B=sbLoa_lhPzAl&WSN$gkn@C&U zhzNpHcW|oM9sc`p5Dy48YO1P$o6Dpe?Jk=&oLxJt^;J|bve3abq?2;t)T`e|YQuqfC@d;M z;>NeYYq$CmY0>~7bFbQ=H-P#=+qH|^dmay4f=l~IQ zKM)$Vz)4(!u7RD0hcJU+eEagO|8josJN%LTjmYbF7Jv=|(t$%@KOEePcR)vvl-X1^ z0<(ZL5P<;%PuT;YTtnrykV>RhVE$kqY=%-&U@3WD9a^*eogf}m81~ZA0X;O(s8mVG zA+8en_$my6JzSG%UxMoky+AT-`oP#EM#Uj1EL3djUquGzcyB%6S$+ca`{&NuS}mw> zqHA%KpKKzPhEG!9%%6v9l-EE3R@~yc@!&hsk^`7tr!27Gh?BsNepFryMG_=bvcVg` z8{O{#{vvqR`5TZ(gomZNb$97M>eSdus{sS_9ciaJ-v4*jWw~0|*+ug130}=KityzQ z5!2Sji6#*vy?;_*!+0(mT=$?OR^>q*thWr;S$AusLq^flVu^QPUh(qhM0u?@_&sAE zs-z0+g53KRtTtq|VI0@&IBcMV{airLAg`PSAIiU~r zdAw%d=2wC7Z~-=`5t2V7^8|dzXPOHZa*<be3gJ{Mp(fuh)kyu(Uh|-CVsM(t=ATB;JSSHeGE4Yp6t}+2|X*T4d9Zm1P9p-iisF ztyE_~LuPwT2BXmM+orxZn0Vk5X#@Lt6@HGj+qEK~RSfHTMov7YYkCa5QgLcy>X zc>bU;CME{@nb=K~(FuKgWA6I*5z=QMcqJbUoNU``(I0U5ccGE7Wqt4O6n6DqhVR+nXokb2~5tf-OHjp9QX3I0z}E3kMCwY~vru+W#OGLrJUb+}y~j zP|&L-z{5)_15KN&p5AwH?3+s@yk4Qux*9CM*EFsUaQ^E zNms-yNodhr=WGgPL*?}E@(m_s(TBB-liD`Oo6;~2e4Q-h)7DcKZ2^WB*eQOB1HR{T8FvQ*&~3Zl8~kThd(FVf(TtR zyroJuK$?YAFJ8Z?Q$ND&WBdnJr=+nk@}h8}RcPO|2}9AOAr-S9skg&@dt`!`N|Z(F zY(~r}61$q=-Ndh7ZqxzQ$9e`Rk=zS>>&8}YT6I-m$Xs@wr<5`^HKk6|jbp1nvObV0 z*>>tM-AOr`diSF^BEO$Yj@h3mOQr1fAIDP#Uk4!T664}DjYZGqOtn#2y*LaIO3^ zc)xCvc+R5R8~=WOe@a9?@Sju7=*?}nUxxeddT1oBQ6#pPe{&%I@cHxS`uciM8k#fJ zbHC_G;DUe4%gZItzQ&sTUD5lzg@x>k{F!%L%A?D}PV4WWU8nTD#mzzK>se12?f+E` zC6;zX?eXKsrluiQ=5}^pBtyj=930$zytDh<-~uofZ}r(sxtnPO`f9kwgT=l8BX;XFQqo@+#4(Dap$V zd`whUUCp<=-blGynPCD$G+@wjzoONvd6v^PSon=!auF3+WSk1JxyDPvwzxoCF*k?7 zR~vi5Jn#Qv`T-YgZr3A75?=MmSXe;cFp56q*Ygvn{Vn$7VOz0<4lzIe9iXff@k&~i z0RdKuk;hecB(Bo=O~|t;K90#oS)oRVn$UbzIJx?@+GcvJ)Idc$2xRFe156lB>R0o; zqIFmwRgpitexc9}a`m55W-8zG$4JTFeqqDuqHCwgZ%Lxf!PX19bHbY@btEs15x7V< zsf&h6?Ddm{Ca&?jr|&Njfp#r=^`_C6?(o_S`dZWzBR+(T44HX@efrkB*EwGv~1_Cge{9(eoqL^hIGo{Y@{TV!{P8c+*1#;jRTh5w#j2&aUHe93M0h>S$GGiC;L3W!Cm>4}O&*63ER6}ceZ|r& zw7YbPI&93&$@zQzOY1l$T1p3zmLE3GJiD}YgFbu}LZ%bc$`p-4iM2i#IeZ_4(%zn% zFj&x61!2r{&BdX#hUo~;m>Pu^zD23_8NL(y-zVYZdv*iO=3U;exCMa&JiHecs@N5x ztUjlX5_(3NY>)fcn$JTo_AfLmTYs;MmbXUUep`B-m%hD|@Ori2C+-*+E$P$(h(Qmh z9aW!~^&dLRyS|ZK{&M}4L#ZD3=ZAuVGReGWkJCF&t^_jEGR@T6KbU`BtW_D<(B4~> z{XZ9ig4Z*`M9;cHuZcq~roqQh_ZnLOH?^huSJk=Ha16m&)X(zx+|L|_lLyu_wZxSP z2?_XAeE!lD&wB0~8V}W!lthTm3I-d>Bu=q4PE<0bDJjMV8Ws+T|AH%&>9e{b#p1a; z5!<%z>-xsY;U#(Mmukmlh3S9?>lvVO zm%4k*ySkqi1a24yNhS{`Kq-{j`?OelndGsi&8~?b?O`sxZ~*?=^2kqF`U+Cat_$a> zQ9l8~FUG>>?!!um-XG555E$19`KAoVXE5*BptAS%RWf=}4+M zBEE5Ej4`Vuy0k)OcT@kJN6su=lBe7%PczG85yX6bnrm=M3{~`VXPWu3kFT^Zh;Yh9 z-6dHfujuwZrogpq%k<-*I_0^_)Ug>@#$(#;Q2e;{6>mO@5ZmKKQ!u0K#4ZNV++|8HCOYY~h7`rFlI2SKD;~#<1+J5YIwH>Kr{%k>Dz(b71T;_fOm%@s>#iyK@sH(qeLL8zEYxUANTHZPO(l+o>P@fd+c76g-9Yk+hVY? z_X}kT7B}@T;!@8fq7e6{2i7_}JL9z2|GN>Tzya}3fP1$j$#j3pqq+KNY_EBTX-H-H zD#b0Cy^be!=Wh}c$VYg%*Q{m9{+>W^ArF2*+Q4Pdlo}2ZAGmzAnW~iH8ZOz|E8CS4 zrQ%KRu&K=dXS1{OUDK^gJ&W;jMd#9G_O; zDF62>7K}GsKl|fyKl@LDwPsY@7H0(I2UXfQ45-ag&map@M+o;;BWj_)Zc4DPNd;eE04_N9Fn{W(I z-}3JLbNTyD+JCbEez?xDu@#S~g@uK^y*;>N$b3GaaqHIp0!22`JZrpIXVoJF%J)@L z__jdLlq}+2K`OC?kI-)pzv_}E`Ok=CiB)=?pFp$+49Q;GkX z`3SF`LXDzdClSJH8Sy^9K`)g*7l)BGts0kii=**Kf@y>mIHTCQbMr2zK5j#XI;eQ8aUlN#^-?HcR?e=R!L+a}Bee~&^K;kT2quYZjuu3R{D(-Q_jFFiU)o~p{_R$(#BJf#T}(dz|-*z&%N#@)j(cA1hvLUjJu4d;Wm*4D~ws5_*k>uPWz zX^j3T8FO4XE6NlMxne;O6@XelqGY^ng@>x$9iV?Q}T~Kqs3o7uNRh_p% zxGH`Mz!(hWaB2w88^~5c%0KZ@kreaugCvm{nuN zn^ed-09xlokj^_p+2Eh}DyZo=1F?b`5OhwHzkw5Y2|z&#?~8~{2Yc_1=4V=ex`8Wc zvenhqeH0pT$*qWU&1onIc9y}pjK`OGVN>Pe@ZM`D-5Np1A4CCM?0`;+5qo>DUxNN`uMTa zLtlXB{e~P{eKEOr{uX*cWySb4YR4`*a2PFrpui}l@3RT1*Q6;Sz%`Q5*qR70%%-`? z$kMF48FlAD*rO$!_HQ-pgE-t?o+rtQrAf80E%wBowa9hP4^*6BAUewuX`4*>pKqoO zr8@;jJA$)*IjUD{C%%}2$G!Xaw;;oZ%^%r74az=$t$C#yfgt3zmV*b} z+EqAId>~T}0O!>qoVK7a9yE<_Y&aEwTTzgc8@*xhfE4pMgKHjH?5|)#O_pPSarURZ z5mMa~HgLFr>6~>0eNm#6NLIWhCEEbLXKk2}{}Cvg_&Ger62Lb%W`9*%d%{m4-%>z)DBAbsP{ft3SlQ)oO zf>a?R%RF@Y-C-kvI>Z5}4to=VtnHofTLu%&b0}IHf(3`tSlf#W&0?s<$PTM^mr%)# zX!mydKRDnX2!A}R6xg7+-IhfAz%5Fn=xKnTv*Qc?JFv?Dq{*${IDvJbhC?4{@fFj? z{PuHRXyk15`(t(WP@hw7TtTD^)j|R}jl%t}ufEZ7gjy&=Jz#3~1Q1eYAV^&t z(PgV2_pM_3g?g?f(5)pWX=<9=sdj~K54-*f8x=CyGhKm6BKIROET=7ED9lTex2UK{ zawdy6y4~5fqBlLq?Y0b;s{t|6R@ZSB;L1KBYCmKtfcYW-eI9^!bnVQYt?)m=aDEJi zD6!O8@A8cIZ(Z)*B5re*eE??wG@8QAL~KA;BUiwxeauK~SUiSVy|ccU+mlgomb1i# z1_8{x&!MkB((e7b8CJqxSAHy~TU6XF>z_+~wrGi*c%-WvL%E6^?Cb-%a+8L2UoSvC zPR3vA9vn;i6Y4Y6>Z~Ds23a1FtV7xDjv^7Tm4L-U#4E^ zdcBP0W0HRf8``ug;uFY9t>=$Bh8w`EcESr!vVQB^rsCy%mUQTvX3iW@5W6t4iZ0~o zKBKg0Sy(Qrg4nxWrtKyN*r23=r5Xi}@Ab)g{^hFoMgCmmSjTy2@+Z)t9K-QocX0&O zHc-C13y|q|Fl)9xn{Ga*Ds-D|bVoW1U|A#e$~eXsvX2soCH6&}?KGY}TjYJml;EJp z5yqBSak7*GCqY)m!y?2Ol`Zz!^N7w-^&uTWF1>C9yQUhPLZIGZbFSwqSxB|bGXV||{) z7Z%XTD*8r$hPjwi&i=-S_NaUNc|GC{Nbf-$?bJ{D4ay*`k3$}rLpk!ZjvS0%96gSwUH1#`d%JmDy=cYc2ER6eHToX^lJ{?k*KN12Guzl($QS`gF2F?w1y z8XLLaz8KY6$l{nH)oLaLQO#2nZiA+omtt-n#9K&*OV9UK7aQTI_L!%ppU$YwxLcR; zpRSu<i&YulY$}j*Be* z07V$X#`xjHYrVN)yPl^Yl_a+Dp9zm$tj``HK0 z=X1{pc_KzX(vH07Pxl0z?s4HXO}C4}cckMhw23Ga&3O(9A$R%20o3xkLl2lO0Ag8J zW0i&2SpC=vmPyH>g8WaF`){+&rI3q)FY_4Od=OUdb0|+VugJ;lX$vy{B6?*$6?aAW3*35lcejFq0z^p+A#yiNj_;83=!fx7aHw?4 zUPac4Akl7^=#Ty!WJ`yVD<$6x4kV_^5jpdm4+-fPUD9O`dP^Q(j9Lk6$bJa8gf~y$ z1wThaQbUr+9$iU~0rl(>gWykzUfrz1ryWGuc~>ICJ3D3CZz~(>uywzClAk2Kki|v( z6#(>1lzp@$RiHH54itzLCatXSU2Y+L(ve*wkOdRfzv#NpkPYCV(qgPwM;1-M8QF~x zj3|*{Jec|@Pa!=fa7mew>kBCLZe;32(nG&@nPeOxE`78V6E1-;C;CJt-dG*SNGXQ% zNKi&zy8mY9kB__RS!QpE&cm&gC%n3k_q@H$dV6j`mF5VyT-fW*BdVv(Sad{ieWmLev#?ozq5Wq zY_d-`6fN8QBk7LuS%KN>&k&x25j*9pN88N!zcahiz$X!CEQAZZxIWhUXs-KKOM=jaRKnSJE%Wh3fenUt*6^Bv7`W;;-Z|K9ITIpC<~7UL zlll2rGA>2yeq#c+o`Tg5&{P`&;sl;4r z1#L8;2ZuJZaY6Ma0k0K|J=oQD?qKr`cjZkGdNpw4vg3>kuJQaDcA5tr!n*`Exp_3F zH*HjGgQ?F4n=LFXTHjOA1SCeEoOpES3RGx?^FmDMn;@>GrPa5Ej%G$}ExE~FV10$u zzcihI+_o$3C{U*Wv%$QYZRnW4^v--upqn)$%I?*Vbxw=~Fg2S1s=41XZ5 zrluCD^bCXr=|0;cr(UH!RB|d(EQ?@Dgv?R)a8KLyROqowug?zz#aG0+LD*m|)Cs6P zG{Pk2YdN>NW!;0ICX?8|QMe?ccmG20MQ6lK;g=gvM2R8&_4WGnYvJq@WZgRS9#r{C zDJy$nwhHQ!l8-$-jUO3vnsP4sSXjS%rPhoz69hjAKBxxwLMCOR|DV^N&}nFB;3(@b z3aUJel6`&a0@9^DD}_~b#z00vI;kC>ZRza_pOcrt2MW6=mBUZUdvJk=&I%gPG>3Fv zR382*Dd8vcs>q1Pk_<@}4pBlKl{=VGAuVDbAY5#31k=fvP+b?QqPO^_)=rdDSjgGL z$YV@-#A5vLybqv@F~ld}&(4lt95VRnDgT=g4~o4nF6QFq-ahadz?m8?dS>^%K7L_sj=?U<$js z?cQG~KX>11EG{vT#q*xPO&|p4fRvdCHO>^gk4p;>+2Azo8=E%os2T4&BY`rjZ~nzB z_Fw#Jc>44y{hQ5=4UgkkvEz*BCg?#Ca{UiA*7zoL_}xOXyU_mj=hv5+P+s}KW~vH` zXo^x~9ss+F`DF)e$hJwG-q<`SQ^GQP;YMKpZS)b6K!YUuL~yMi*oN9Bbdr5&Uh|ez z;;Qv8l#~HeV-GYP%qh&&w#h8I0STOss<8?vC|5b5-0ZuNi-r`|JB-rAPGb$9{a9QWFrQOU`$04P_&cRV*JvlTmK=gw19-pR>3M&O6 zWRy~N63aD49UBP-)KeZWXLBfbo1s-2xcJp_38&wI*VN&VUBm@3IwJ) z+S+c&tTlPCwy{wpZ)ZFTQoc&n*p7_a&2Sszfp_A!Kp_qNoVUy!9Cqhh{rIgXh(2&4 z2WpTaQzBnG-|^@bIhVH7=-j|SyUWW1Rf;x3U4yx<%fiBL>u_FrW6IUaJIO9R3DuuJ zFK|a{0i*%<_!Y8h3dpvPo@i(Q$AvFe_Oy)zd8MpR7M?6WS$neSwF*JmvuDp(2w{K} z|0VOB+KG#1^B8>Qkl_y8BiPh(nTN3hd{y${L(Xb#L4jO+E?iplrD|nOP0eFJem*{R zKkQK+WJ~3rU(ml*pSz;w+osm*Z=v3?*F1UpJ!X89ujE^qfbv07D=A^YqywmXsF2G! zQT}Rxr5hZB$W_}M%U;>o*!cc^aI*TQ1QMU~#H=q?R8+LGvhrid_yK2UmaFiJt3tr_ zF6%-o&&}QVgCcD!8A8hHXMuFRy(v=(O;0b^8}LtQM9t)sf0W{kB5U(@3mzK!TtF$l_mkA+qJ@6r}yr<8O+GjutZlh~zmviwF*McrE1s zME+v@XhNV9fTU;&RSNa{O;CKx@$`cLDA|xcyGU^aqUjr4oIb!ka29Z_(n&o^Xw>Jg zr4O~c;ch8INN1h;wFP1$XVj-f9R@X&bqzMtd`BJj=9d|G74WD^7LW}UAijn2jhlCj z+N0)X4_S=N zNaV9i=$91}tHc^vEJR%%IOR5h(Dp@@6X&89v6=Vw#r9J(y3H`$~J zqpJ=zgjjB03bxBU_s!`nIdyCUNzDj`eN0oYIEo_O7sfMM-)WJ@$%SXDgXS$Ma@cj4 z8pC5_oi1>kYVI=I=xi(8u!t$qR3-R%%OpiU6(Qb96|anf?Hy?Ms`~;Fcaxm^)9Eup zHALK#2+rlp3DF=d*KMx}gvzXiVYWjrd7>yXI;FEj2!r;ci z|4JYee;2>d!ZoUNn#bWuoMt)M zz}eaD;*; zLt1Rt#wh6H7kzvw{>q5}`->1(L)PQGFW6UQvO=mA%U+PZw)bLSeX^uYA)jMS%0lU% zGR_^}+~sJf?(icZ*3oc|i9VK5kjhV3x=(8E8{(*(Hl1HU@7IhvYx|o8yWd{T>cJ4WX=QgQNKu`X(DEGXm8ivnebP-L3ZLYp~Nf~_IsO7l%IMe_lhud|VBoTAy zDzmLSvLu8zwTxl}bl}`vQ^RZe$;6HG$Lo8dtO(Y%(r|CS#dp}Xw2J*s3L`iAeCA^v zeOQu4*5AG25Ls_@Zxy9X>0;}_OJv5j9FR50p&d@rc|SLUaBrZ;uoutKnKj+JnjdBW zV~X>@J^%U7bV*X~IWE4Pajz1$noO^k+>04$$n8O;`o;u7z!x!WKSqsmsB^X)<7QcA zaLUw5{xLWx;pS-0lpo4s5g|F`ZQ9(Vs35*v(a-pq^wLGz`Hoa$G3MJ&Y1vdcoamTB zHSbgAvfk5=_(yfvNn2Q;PRKg?+De(isP$OEfP$ocHZLzqBjym>`1i;-KQpE5 zz(j5EWqf>jlZ41XSnR#B(~1)t%c=HDcvo9DqsBL-;3VS*WRyo5#yvD^|VnoSc@$iRANFyd?l|-aaJw z!?N9yxhRSu)FJHVq1x)?+nwnKb()|pm;Q6Wm2CV&!EVVvlH{j zs>xxQhMN?2;z29uMsrS;zC9hi(ICwIY=m~35z`{|Px@N65emt7v_8IAR_sH?dcIi1 zZ9zmo4n?_QX^8N9uYl`soz;(q=SYfIiC8C+ zI$Q=I@)T#=kI!whBC|*ugx9_aEX9%VXXmD86Ak{Xwd>8_;TtKQeZtE=cGnH-km(wx zf4DIxY$P>N8pijsu@1#-+Iq&{VNZ1YUQ;-6;fQIa=cqqay6Tz`?DZyOlja?7s9MJ@ z=BQYe#1)ZGEp2BMKR59?4^uaM6+ zb)}SjgogG)DM58TasNaok2>kHfOVUrotikUQiNQ>pHls?V;9?EVv|PA(m{QE=w?=U zk!<3Y*YU5UCTJk3iP)x}CJxrJFru?UmdbGC?QM353iPuX# z*Ji}W$Is2p{ma#hDktJRdvEYB{$wGvj(r#{Fq#Y>Ar(0s5MR3CK<7aNY?Fsi-&HeZ z%J|H|9^~&_2bL8yhMpm27cNmzP%bY=aPB3eprBwO^9FR3_n)(I*JfD7;T05lX=SMr I2}9ri1D;I^JOBUy literal 0 HcmV?d00001 diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/product-witness-repaired.png b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/product-witness-repaired.png new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dfc6d8b748fbf717bd73f6162736d6e8b430e2ac GIT binary patch literal 98323 zcmdSBgUp2%`4hhD;v99D*|YcBYu)#+)(*X|sz8W;6(0=^jZjHZRs#(U3;v4HkBb3+NYUR# zM?)hN7nAZ@YklIT)8NhlL8uA;nDg3+Z1&vn_#t=_K=ZKSQN+z=EO z{3YH{l$KfX<=uUC1(zp&eR>8L+Z|4_$>LA(6l-p;l0$HlKjIyEZaTyuw@WBMD zOLStc2Wz8Y6kI>wJqTCRAs5-SpKS^K{p0=chetzrBrS+&po)KdJ$I9AxB`;|xIpYd7=2fcp7r(x|$RM8KYi%xAycfzU_QlT}Iz{Q_k%||uR>2wVU=lFOD#`cV!()`~T$reKRP@g-^7gxCW@e`M#iK$u>==V++^%!gpE zlLQ|9ldeQA)Bw$xh6ZyP?a@u&=gY0IoieC)Sa|X+?bz?il`FxQXrB*c%SoK5IIoQu zmkq=!=DO`Jwzg3-2XG{b?SI$w+?c2qOzm*)i@>uQE~2fhNs%I*-xz+Yo}*cydbSNI@BPx$cRg8&`sY}KbL8_w1(i|c}x7Z~JE>X9d_=?+*@ z^=GjmyiONge!bAC|IXMR(Gggym#L(zOfBK*dc3nxpprURYOYL>E@b)B@a%`-y%fGT zj!V5fS+2{kdq?kB#}85eVNW%=Vw0WhEdxVz3InU z=es^pcoS9jrf@4vFbv&SSU29EBR9|MpM1Nzv0FLm&gC-w;Jx<8ho5E_k`0}YTT0El zj}T{@K2y!id6s2mWt7~H%iZ^%pN3(>T(pCCisYyFm@bB+A=k?KHfncOE$5|r(?!dy z$18q*)YbX;_y+}_;?&;W-jN-Fiah4#RKqz;9--&opTb#0#Xh_9MCF}Mag>pBwSOw^ z-9QN!Sm5~L^&jq>rcCV1(G=i1WtKV~-$UXWab+ityt7YMaH3(_q7>g8ywR@RLAk%` zIMWo^aQv#_D^uv9&OEc%>A~65`KiyG)JT~{Ujw4M0Wr@m`KZL`Yh)@frA!FRqc2W{ z-@ZEtwi8VZF{cttc^&Fs_;{We+Ik@t=Mqho!@^w_vi1qQP7>?%XqV|Wx^6LzxUZ|j z#R};}w6_xQ?#lk!S?Ers^IA-`AhwDY+vy0M`( zU5jD76GTXTV2JGYv7h|j$e!i7v)xW_ir}vlf7<^Vht8E@lD=u`lT`6J@I7N=WN*fXza74q1yt5SWmk9X5C@>;bGu7t&3^0TFQpLa|Vk!-`K@=p(35{ zA~;n()yl85a^6lL6e6g;ZsX8<+O^ZVye4wloV@pOvwDecV`lZ|$2-WGvGwnT@jplk zwjKM#Et=@0Yg{%BkWOv$iZ`@`D_xK+_ho9oxr$V0IX-U+z=QctCF+p7JCP~NtdPCG z@oOBJHlK0f_plTr`{l-`FP=E8cwOpmyjf^$W^O*(^*k-mZcmKFj?ytK)TmtC=iO0P z7N3te`FiJfJRh8lCF}y%p8N3)6Y{A{;Rl2Wl2<>VGolgm}BbfiVJ;_f#Xog}fpB93>@XL*qr&D|_}S?9-D zbN+UdceH6tDa5y1$VT#^rtIrnoOM;mo+~{XZ#dKafdAXSRZ2wYs-(9VHf!r-sX4)l zuJgmx&(D9%zLW4enLgnuula?`Xd~9J|8(Kg_vQt38;NC$e1g-L^3a6Y4pMcC$x{hEFawoFhFFs12*fncLQke_baE4|+Ri(?|QN z=B(c9v`UcvmQ#r2WB{K+CwalHUdDjhkF=E?SUfoo==0T+EPH4~P@(6$<>fiZ72?i{Kb3PKZ*h#O2 zCT3B~@!ei6^6=I7GtQj9K(aHe-aGY-h1GHWNOj6>DPvjl=*6)I0(rV=iY9(AVk&|& z>3zDMh1@G}neq~jxd;_<+xGrC_E~PRl+^-*ukgT2s)RY^f-UP zScSDRPmkN&tJYgBHQ|-$HH3ZK8do&qo{r=P7)8$LGGNp{^{ftXSs&Y<^w?|-MohmX znys-J%KtW`CV7u$P14b1`Y2D{=fJ`z$n;7vmP6Va04mq%XFVCqUekU!2veGZiI#p3 zL(gq2L7Vd}qVwrmNx#D>AD^BF6Qy)+^CT?7Sy+d}cguxGv=xF|ttM+l4|gfJv`3I3 z%f@0~wuuDqGzSrS?Eh{>H@NqNsv1+UAk_J6rQn0@e^A5O{jH-s+nSCd<6*SWl!>0ji2ctq#f%4cFjtz>nX z4ui^`uBvh=UDUDU$r_a-IzgL{cGr|Ofg`$GL`;RnOMd2)gY|B+hQt8>W4btRx?Ww0 z;MZrr-xu=@BWeL)d}YU8m^%A4HS4qU2zZT!w0K zXJ5EpfYmBXR00nXZir~oF7l^kAb{pN5P!KtW$GR|UxiRPEemnu#FN`Eeg|A=^{BQS z=CP>_(O|=$tK3-XwZ*{|-N>%UZpX0q_%biGXkV#dyPMpq&D?INOr0H;Q90Hj15Mbm zS*$UXzxYGlt1wAV^2C^1FMf+`UZELl@#!B%)OFrbu;czwJN-3FzwW0ZG$fpd#-9GZ zr;FM5V|fa%Zl#TW*^@|dDjK4zr>J2kt`qTIM;AO#@QEPw+b3JMo=)L(4)`Q4ANZL( z{)3@RLyQQMP0jkvrEl6sosqP+FF%lc(vy;Pwq|iY=Yt@+_!-)#&&f)GC$jSVUc6!+kiV-XVWC5|(R!eEj+80MjDD)f-QJ1t*fL21eqHmd->= zUILJw@2=S+JvE9Cbw(W7FL7VrxsxJr6J6z#;{-7mT|*+^_)3dDI_!(pyTkW*eJ;y{ zn7rf;iyFOMy=CLSP*j6q)7Twui+{fAb5?BJ9OQMjKkSW*vD4^>>9Z^BW9rkPUcLO# zG4&FSh#i2K9y>|o(H!8rmWC5l``!xVR?acB=8eCw)m{&9Dn-^CxBcxShXR%!pJLt0 zOU$8m7X>_9VO6mku9ZNyBjzpFci3B2*Nq8!*7UX5=gjgV31WPt_D!L082G(d9-*(*S(%3d}cN>tLlIq z&JfoA!n=m~($!g0&@c}^KmPo@*MsjzUewBijb=7nOnT#mo0IPzaCwxlu3gd5YsvM+ z`K*>DaoJy_r`QFTnKxb!mo{2o(eb#~?mO?~Gnxv7xooy3vmrKFuLYE26Vf-%xu$h} z?7Q9h>(xn`H=-iLXoOcuq2>mZoMqkH6FA?%_eGF2J~hw zf5`?C%Ox)t*r&UAs6E)|eI?xYz0~gx)wAyaI{Rtaq{VJf`s zW(TJCRM&u&(<>5Cm_T1h?Ywqhz#1&^#6mV0`7jzn-}66k~-Zyfkz z5g_d5d5$+G>t4OO`7OjU!$~nFj;~eJ>%_^uo$bypZhUSimYx6bx`qQ1W6-?5AX!w8 z%>u9B?OT)lh!rg4&F$bI%>3v=UQ^%qPYHE}d+9mf_05NfFRwOSjVTLRs@bpB`A-V~ zpf?xEPV0suX(=<3CzhKy&VNw)uC~Id_uN_I_NGf0?Lo!c7JGa}%=1~whNHz-wrk>q zy}M{R>;o}Wj)-shB*>L4WT)zj%}HA3P|4kca%v2!h4e#xrA)WQ)QE@(sF*PWzQ%sD z07exuD*fHpMm}+DEoFLK(!{IW^4P4isAy_HL7{!abD`2CPUq}1AU(_nNr7Zj&KcDU zNxIN-t$WDpO(xG!;8pT`S90$4(P*D{{xAa`V^z)xFQe3%H!!@L4WXOEtisjDfKu5` zxZ+*jiY($(7mg9cAb%Gluem21Wl6upCZrQPvPCZ1%12Obqm~bkB;U%bL26&Z+7A=# z!q#IbVzhDG1NSTC_wIY_!C3ib^e6+l`AVB#X=bLgeA11wOZ4YQ3O0*0o4;y?n_>f( zbv-arJtTZW?cT?cmnD%C4S%V7#<|H*!fBD>lc;ITOW&j$9wOH-U+j2r=)cIDQ+LeE z&22qgq~E)nH*R3aq06!zO2*z_r!w}lNS`_}e2-PAbeG;Q|C{<^#U@)_j3J#ZNC3hF z3DQrTgS-zd2pV-_K%TAW-8&0 zd@@xqN&aB%oLD<7OuSKkBpA=BW^!~I&Mvr}kyNdGmEBuXhG*V@Rv-IrU`bDF+2_zt zF645-3=y&QN)jyTROyv@V%eBw;)uo)tSvod*A1lVn@_v;(td!H#YoRDGbZq{DWF>; zSpJ9=$t+lQ>Wm8L*Bv6cgL^4|c?`vZKolaQ7(rh(-LGr|O2oW>7UB8x`Za3LA%2BV zWLS5$W9oZ#7jpOSL3zQgHr_nxT>7kmqGQCMd+@RpM}E8AD&HB7u>g{Tn_)c<9Ala3 z&$m&ITj1&q;IP^jvyn2PKYH}2we1ym05KD#A{s~|op~C0cSHP4rZ42<|9G#HY@x=o z2rP)=npVFE2?!n$e*}-GSA}iTGcxp@g!ndAU*ZrMRN1`&twJ@#&WfIwn+&d!G|Jfz zL@xXFGpUZ3P-!3R*~y{j@_xxs^K8&)V2a?`TWn*G{ zuH8Nl*xdh7lon3AZRPB<|DUE*sx3jl7+^<=qM&~iw!64#LX`jhq5l6%RqcN(fgJHk zNsE83D}cB#CSyH}k%V3L4cl)Q%FZ8lk!F;AQ$@tA7;Gi)vSJtWm>BT!dBMz9nowZ|vXLjO_c+)( ziMUgFCsMFg@7<>;R_#kvRk8lfz8`Wdt-hI`(Cw3xjJp)0?>w^3KWpfrUt-~L&WfbC z`|n6ZKBX=Am1*2}yW=#iJ1t+-I7hB5(ibjyR<1Z+dtBw-aNNwCTq@|oqADTjeO*c9 znb21!(~e_{%XS_;ZycFM`JXA6I0~|=G>uLsuLWFvi183L3z*c7HYRIRMmR$TYjt-r ztsnOLGc2?=9;?4zi|MOnd!?LZz42bFM7fYzw4>KEsr~rYK5@Z|9PO`{RZSL6ZMK%~ zy|q?t>3XzTsv&zF8iIVDR+8E%UJV&trzkMs9tHzP=*Xqd91w;!!N>=Qv-s z_fjlr@Fllc>b!IZmc$OuJQ`*i6YDueZ{dt#p5Y$Nr6?MuC6AZb`=l((l*^CjL%JDv zUYx&6c5s@PU8kfJz4>{%L$tHCF@cO@z3c;(~Ze57U_RSCUuq^f;>%FqwjH3-+01&Ip!MNk(}u zMo@|tn4~m{WGL}7QE)x5Q?lcBXbF_7xWJrA#xX0m7~dhPN@MqHWoYeLMxb|uMgz&8YJjCATG(MBz$w*wcfs*`GZCleV!*wnqMGxM{uFBL4UtP$MkEtO0~6{x3hFxWoOXyfJ?`9CaaLvAfnzi2yp1uNSK)OyHlxYp%=esQwkRMK zZG521ml3yK6ulHi(S0s5L{EpeSmsnXXx_C|tg@n!S4+M5Vw?JSoA6dXzB^$Yu^eR` zwh{;emq*nH51RrBbc&xO7vHbf8!a7H`81f90qel^J*dzTh1 zhi+FqZJr`xkT2`T1Tk6$H}-1%$+xa988n@DTB1su!SGSfH(G@nJ-2p>-G6i~^%{ye z9;_{BNzq)<<+=(%AEF$_@(tEwf6-^50R?ykWgw zfoeud86~el%kNoo61_|h9WeEN2Kfo0uF!9&*XRqT`kA;aC-uG zx=-TNswagXgx145KwWoxZ*P9kulbqRw3Ou|;c;LEiXn9Ds_jaW*6eG#2WkXyeVO9A zaP^?Z)?mDB>GY2PT_a>3OpCPzE*&e%Wvjm3)!TlK4Hr&MHyeiQ{!}_vbRW!t?qrfi z^YtT8@((78xr{peBg%;%!+7QDjS9eZ_9ADlOe^kL`Z-n?$bbwpI5afS2vF1x@ksSs zmZZ<-WF5%Y42$|MzszS;(!kpA0!9f}OLybx{XJHgCuL8*ja56c+mBV+`W*gp8LtS2 zyPgK@`|C@bW79h#It$%7LVsFrHJYKnZ5RwZMb(K=N61<^C)^+wOyS?}M@M7nZGFt= zHPDzfafs*;$4gl*Fy=2-e-0GDSDvjDWNCkR_{p%ryFH5b6~8IAV^W>_{w%qM^S3mi zUo|e^KAeEi-j^fzo%lb$=ASZ8gHj1n(;Y@^f~2 zh!WrdF^0LGb~e`C2LR%7N9yGH0xVk=wfU1@w|D0HCkTw3Y(e@5&uZ|)qq1eq_d3P$ z^%CcZ-5>8Bl%?!0erv{yC|%HsrV|gkM0?j2sMsWMu$l{o+Z(@XKxt|PQnN#0!K-n_ zFEUKRe)dB0v^*OkN!RAnjX+|FV4{NU(Gp`XIc+o456|0_^Ajb3 z&&(1IhY3)q>+4T3i_`d&;mvtB_m2~Ghm*HKK7bprzcSQLB<8ey9|pxU&wce{}tWQ*zX(RuE zq=1gp4x+390=FF&U&|lwegJhl-d(DEHq=JcGPG)YX-3SYXxBNEVZv=U8OeD*a`VO8 z`)_1gxO7a3Jl-z838s5KRe$#7#p-2V0~L8@g($d_Ib`IiuOkAa?pC#q_u*7Rs z69OO`!CjC%oN&CCcHG{61SsEd5^+%35Q*%v?w2v}SpPgvTIC$N zo8aglBUO6lmF1&ifW>Dpak^2n2{y*|9pbkDP!R{?wjc<;0QI+gd%beXpe+XsO{j|> zHuzmO^kmlJ0Q3I%@W>J5^*h0rP-fHK$`IHqdz3!glwgligIbMuusXb1j>Cy6LV&=e zQ$!Olg41Tw)&P}z%I91hTaCp|mmAK|fQ8qIjL#e4ifGGsRc|;D3I&Q2>_*YpJO1i- z#kh^>t)Y4c#{wxqi(UjuF;C<*tcR~O6!O<54%L7j6)> zuno;zgShLK5mcynm9N_OPP2s{Uu3`IJRz{GXs{?i)_g|mVuQG_6i7h1MSZ$4^_0i0 zr9p#NP%u6hgO?KCrmwQvu>X(hfv*2?Z za6A^j^NHe*ffe^k93m&){V6k@aRfwm?(QeRVY8>a_dxby4u!ATge$*5T!%lF7gFrK ze)+c~QTpoo9xI3q@Ts_k=f7VSyngXstB}8_y;sh#u3@xTec9-oOPp3Tl9>h^ zgg0$Tc^dDP1Q26I-uy}`6GAQZo$VnH^PCnC`RiiG_eyrKto>O7I2=YY`}o6?JPy{} zFb#t1ml|W!ge>h24{m;SK(amD`P=EC4s`hR9KQOU*@qQ|I^5sFpgs}uXwAxS0sa5w z59Dr0JYpzfnsTb23p@*I@?8!Pu0bHf2-L#1k@2-E`xc>00xVfLf` zP@f;EJGX-pepikO$wMJAq55_b<32WN}c);0EhS28a>Z3=`TDy&9fVb)ML z0p#J72kSeXn3YP51mKfBoQe&uPFb0nh1rd#{S3(OFkk>qlcyj5pTU47#S#*enMp@w zeCWpvA}t3+HTbur$HvzLNjra#E@R?cvVs~90BpbyfS8!a!G{|4*Okz-XKb!(9fLph zci`c+ldvTBp(S(aY)pTBS-nL^`Rx7?yK1@}oC%B*3?f6dCw7&5aByt zjU_e!{ynE*z308?Bax#RYEY~1BtGp}X^W&jT}@Rw2J}^>3xF`-b`5~n%ibFkqH(OX zCaq!o&ooHW=aPB!-)ZFGcP4S`CQ0ob$1*Dbi1>y+1J3WY2fx+)v!pyb5~d8JouFoy z+KiU6w(FUjzt&<=R8kDXO&>z1_(=4{m}M?sg8{rs^=W zvs^`-_Ujr+G{t(=O$&=@^4!c%U)^{nBNCdMclI<|K|t=OeDeByXZ(Q(t2vZuDJXWt z%^}wB?reOv9G1Vv{6@F@>DRzNYJznSU*3A8POzrA={P+!V2Bom9kkf z8c96*SLr$N$!L{T0yy~R$fT_wi@b9HMNM&5z`SePytM{pVl;Km!deN4x!ReQGt#7< zyBPf<6HT7tRSs1!H{D~;R!_M-?E?myA6M6rLLIdB;ZO1#0r<64?!+);T9EU$;~Ht) zp=K@-Wiwo_WkpSY&n37+WbCS*8`Vo7)rH3jLW96yS4rtF)MU5%I0YIuZv#T0;{Nn! z0&x+e6O`f)bE@ScLBuh%P!mr3`wiY_7Fk|57uVpP^LyNKUR%Z|OtFY(y9d_A{pqkK zD(zweF93Ehy0@XYw0mX`OZa$7_6%9Zz&jdM7!NIn!mtl%Zxr~9%Pq`)6pFp#SY6Dr z-gtp8Sz&6rYJ#rjGsS>+l~0fLHY@=E^95>I2k)N`COd6mGru`D^(~D&SC*o2n3pk$ z!*ClNTY-*xpQ>xkg5=;({!dLZ+{(H>hxX#RpDPJ&`BE#XE_2T>$*o4rmMlQ1ng^(K zi&1&aW_=AX0$e#ys%;A}0F8Az8tKNX9WCP0l0q@B--22-Gp~e}^K77TS(iMYK7=On z;PaUM&bWE2p=wATG400tN4J%g5X4B;5w5g%+8@XA?@{jwBFD?iZ`8JL7t>2oIp*9z zr#TaId`5J8kv9w_y+NuZic>RxZK{F({bE_4#2qx~_-Ga%b|=sM&f}|H#n2rWd%k|A zPQq|Jc_CKi3@D$?7p8Rc1HkT0_*W%7MKsSVLX{BBdVqW%g9L{ISlnyvQ~Py0NU}h9 zVSTi$fK|xrWDgiiW<(ONp(;W-naB7k;T3_F51+w?ew703hTQ=`g@{}v2Lk+A>!4W$ zdav)`bKCs-68OLvZk}rapoVckqBPU4Y;94rmb_Pv!C~yc(p(43x4=ag#j2b{BkFKr zN@T1GPUOZgL^67KcR*by4L-SPJ4r)%tL@$AHaH2@!Y@uMq$$Z{G6@$QjxUxF4U(L5 z4@K4^%?9~T2$cY5am~e=`EMta&5H5bJGp9WC(#nC{^S^UAKpIvCL-hFhB1j&Y zej(}n0}hX&VcV{b-`w&A%w)U2(iQVR68zR zx_V<7K=W9g$00a1*JYkOVY4TWPcZ-xawkN?N&>X@`C7_hhz4|2TqO*^<*_>BqT~Zlx zO%omTr3YxYH=~++vfWHF4!7_Q(;&G<=C5Mzz>{im(=#TG;{iG6VGg8H=4wB8EB&05 zku6QCZx!D6*qWBE$>CS;((j1^3%>PZ(h-7jW|ESl$$p)w#NK2aTj#Q3l%o47rW6HW z?I+#OLR7kPwFf89Sx`j*BXHDtji%*Vks|r^HVOI~A-DPs^&I*A&8e&lwhd>_ zT9vyI!c2DDgd>y8ewxC3yo|DVjB3iS2|Y_DZk%x!9*vbh8)BxLcto6pbiCf#corTi zZj-;PVq-U=9MJin$_7{ zc^g5INU_e!sHDDpWcc3QPC3l`hA{S%MTDtM?7%7E&;1hdPuaYMGc&=byRXf@dZpGd z7Fbboy{zFY3%Wqc=uN;w-@C*9)o0w!=?eJBvIgE1B2Q7tiP4g~e-KnIK5`Ji$efH6 zD+CM41z%z=9Y2nJ-cvhn!=|#p&g?5FC}{1W9znmBtz+mV#Oq9uPmV$LMsXwGRw-$Y zJ=2xx>x24VfhD>4%1PHnU;NermPoo3s7c8k_Bd0*>sE3E6+aW-7|?Bd+gijdebQGOg`5s%U$Kwt0qX3}N8>^##A9yQMN+Uy^;P6)pJ?iR+OR74)$s{`h* zN7opJ|KjdgLq6ym)|H=ae!0(g#JZBZAFPQEVqylVIXwnwu%_iNd*5YcWd#+n5)(As z6g$7*2UN&x!@D(%0vg30vre(WSxYEcRmLZOt3bi4uezbqS*{#$om%m7-Qa62BfhW> z0?D@4oN3Cf7tfW0M)NR*=Cdb=muWG2Kd;P7OB^( zMFF5!TP`YU5MAZ?L&3Qm=$NxQdsME=I^y_$RL!{6>k%6*9{2pzi|M>S3#$D$eykgl zV6@+d>%F~E)vWPWt8lQyxcNz6W~9nTo#M&?SVb)npP{4y^WzNGz)+AioXrHMbvw;{9+}m*swA7(qktV^;j*KuUwxO7^!=EVh|Q zGM5$SB9#%7*maoB+sp>&$xqR(EZ>2IgUi@*ZvnV^#Y>A!x3){fR>k!v?{+;?>JNn? zBYDuM|Dfp$C5%TL=c$QpI{EfG^=pSBv7m z7$AUyL&MAK6L>Pr|7Z#f3GlGL90FB;STX()6sXS$xc}G*44isTsNOjx?JO#m44;Wp z*o-EZ31O0UPCpeMA8Py`KP`;ne<&jd$sf`K?+5xNOT38Av+xJv%c?G~7y>|*(c9k` z8&!9)J(c{QZzbn~Z_RdfII_EXPX5m;X_Hk|zWp0MOYUBpLx*{jy@d9k^$xg(0Q zvdG<=#2QJ&`O!%c)M&U!)?+v^q(I8!)m#_ z*U+Ox{?`a7Zyg$(ZBs}88~%=1#l~2;nx@FizihFCY!uMG>;S{*7c!AsEuH_qjO7nw zRR520iZK$|NtFJj16A3Lpzc5p6%`I)2WW|f(#9h{i@&qz&C%?3?gV zLHoM?sMHK1`2pvP!VROJOoNr9K=+EEmqbDx=#)j3=F*$DSfmZ0H0sqjf2_IE9|x&c zgPrX{B*glo=)`~DMFTn2p!{j<`3uki8tQvt`Rm8B<{Mxc$+m4w|LTF(!2VM$}$j)3$ z2n?EBMsx7c5umsFe*z|@(>!zVkZM*hyyn+!3o`5{NS^}&_Bt4~c=#J8s-?xUZiv4<(lmxKk3ncDmxV&dW*)fJ>Hyk=q!D(Q*Xp2=!@odgv-S(Uo z78Zx_Dq!sZl%x$iAd4P{Mxl6py+?o1=v_wA`%-;q!rC;OBe?Roe3zF7Q#fehd z|4IVXW%P}~JOYPV@OWgyUK8Hu#1w~pAK?|!*bLl2kLhGekR*?xo7b&ZjQ<`k?i($+ zK@!8}Yj4ElyN!KHXOuun8rw}WdAStoR06esfWT{ft8b3BM3?#<%&gyu!~h2&M*kJ% zP!@Okm_vfM9Eaq-GFd}vUPw~NssnLuP?&BJ2YG@u%AKM=Hw zC~DzeEv`}=x1cX@k56L`pT1eneaqJM(c^FHB5m&j7}=&}s8_^~s_&c>t6HkBfe6;HhDn8$t-w8oO!MAW?@Z-R_L1%M|russ*T};=*U5KUIPLm|%yZOE` zZI4=%I>6$ay@IX@3-t!tRZQ9+pmUf}Kbp&F4zF=sQcd8C62kY@DU%DoJfHF!5h>oY zJpw#cgDXe#aFQwjj*N7y7T9(f1%v8yG{hljIa+&cS)O&PklI|8OAC=oxYqi*C*dnAONqg}|9BZ_ zY8-dseem$5%#{M7QUoocgs$@$f29gvX>m>2k@AV-HGP@QwjuDlwco@_&}+`YKb6F? z8PLlR!2zz6=kR?JmZBf-4Z()I*n*+=g=$YYbfYj=&GVYhx_u$+W|7X}9N^~rpTeE( zE7th58k$O)4%u8ihQ3=qyLYiX)81RVe7Nfc;XLs>0pocc4-grj3A>s5Ggrug4Xbv+i!pNW$ zX&GkUP^GRAaYwB2lZS($JZRI`zttn<@ADv<>5+}ndl(KrFK#5WjO=vnoPf&Ev!s-- z%^Nmf;Ja3diJ@MRqY&+!dFviuw3LebmAs`QOZDWKM)%_xT&>*Ocx)WLiAgkMd&>S3 zD{SeX^puwbu8>?Fy3ETbDquS)mg@>Ki!B88E^sOw`cH*!>y!N&qe*EHza@}!rqgip zz#nU==T*%2V0!Nm?ED71{c#S8)}YlsG==Otdl&zxI?z_y2b*bM2mx2_Js~PCTfS{VhF-tq= zdQ5usYpMP^j#TI{ywJn}s`?EOH!ky-Q5)E&2Way;R*v0lb+%GtP$1hbF`Z{sm6W}{ zVdI%{`6=a?G{%hCm%~r(ba#5?g5z@<)CAJVu4seh%>+`#jWyBr6tjUJTER{!r;Y1s zUpY!PRVw;iV=wC$FH3P*>|iNUTwozoOuhGvJ!JIj%SS2DoV?G^4vTAd?)tmS9r`zX zxK(fYlvOh3N%W?TOI<;e(V__~TowAQ(=@Px0MFUc-d0cV=>7RGa8O+UGYI!P6rs60 z%`~=yxk@l9^6ur&f8a-cMZfjD(HH%4Nb2N!9o|cP8?hnv1^je04a){CjDr~5-=u3* zcBJi7sfld`W6$hpY;ddhSBK}gy0_)36g3k>)5OMTDT(r!dLe{B!sl()az1S66S3Q2<@dM%S5@1C!+K7?2t}FWa&5PK?57XxMfy z=k(cymN?%#5iM~`EHzH-r2i^0#tdwEAqj?_riqA7A=ZyKgp$YeWaE+%Ql&-)FFT+M z-`o0anlHH3ui+Xn3#iRHi|^^LFG4!%H^0|^q;n~Z@kGCvk4+r#J)G{)&0Z1lPQl+jR_M_~^beGJ_lNuSay!vpYlT-3eCuM0hedHw!~ zFcC9!WpC^+b|~(d0scx~B2qzIV$myxt|%=v>CnwRz+)c36!mB#H~l$)tXTzdKxGmz zhlwPPeErXMk{d3D-vro|8$x>;yRA|5_;Z)`?`-Rse4bhZ(3uql(!E12lQlLvp?TNx zo3=5Or!Xi!5#{O%7SOb>o$4J=ygIc5Qa`b>xW|FhWY-o*%Y#hgYzE{XK$e@|2SFKy zT*-qrq(~jZFcZd6U?LLK!a>*>i1Dl(s4HaglX#4rn-9KTx)3}MB$wl2Q$z}Kt`xRG zGHk&C@*iPeqFL5pImV#6D5}N!Sw6phtBK&|^^a-f7thpokr4T{n|v+PvN86#`}tMu zUGlwwf-Gs;fEkgX(==(gLzn zdn1O}XTXs&I1B>BF=;}*pGe`Vmn$kO6L=^C^$77qztf4xr`c+V(7fVTEZtCGT;gqMTr-h57HIQIgseoqWca zw`b0--84<`#P{PbltE}XdS-Sie<(52r&BCMQ);@77|2l|yWSMdDOG#&VrC!TDxh&G zYxiL>T_>*kTiqFlN#fq%SLiTRJ4XO1e$a<5R#pr9k{1L{YZ z&0#F|pY!?8smuNM+1NEJ@opwrbyjZfkFW(A#pwL}-jIhP>>Aq(HLrk)6A}$+h)+Om zSQUf+NC7aK8jQ@$IUvs9G3BD%$&u{Ze&QGE`-;VQ_k;?zeS*EYi)BpLc+?9W+F1tTpViNF=hKl@oKfesd z!;tK6GtJKsntviN+VlQlGz;i#PadDBqnzA+vMQ|d_^TF6_BCXpi+ochyxbvXG+zE}ZYLTDwo2NKXRt(} zqBsRojU8vWOom=6eDMA!tcsKZ6s`ovXVr!jNIdKSJA*wUDP{#f)mqnxfI0BNU1sFjs-(DLda?^)Cz zGq`C9JX(ck4|ax9p#579Gl-{zPR844n`55|3Wk6+#hOm{c^?R_b)blsy98|X;d!yK zr^xmMG8_=A5rUA_H$&WH@+~W(D;-#m4}{cT-`@<->&n7z#7aD?g#J4vn_!vgSydX9U|P8Zab1M z5(UfAuj&hIasd`{m!S}~qbcdqCHcWmrt^C+w!MF>t8O6o<2K|#c^OGA1rgCl+5R+% z8wLlQyBNircL1_5jU~2xvgfomc_|{n>)DVH9|I!CoFq%HGH+c#LiXDizrQP~sY$x; zJq2Ov`Y0Y5+jK?^U~>^9Vz+Ob%4KCRa1LPpoJqDc@x_)F^_y^ggY(}(DwpE|(2a^m zK>&w=X%{xJ%Nv{2^rZ=f*M^X#Bu@oZO{5BxL};w@;#WXYB>x%^O!}W}15^g+++o-SEJ=&+9=u1X`1`1ReCrtT@c0IvZ_1xm?&e4AAk;cK#&3+x+C)ibU zB?^26$&=+A2>-o>Eos|AAE&>j>mWF<+QIW6s$M@Uf`upOO4Wv#Jbq-KWH<_&ic%gL zJ6TWGUa7p<{OVf2Jsx7$&(sv=%0(ivk>1m@K?Vp?;eN0(N;~RY`u3`wJAA`?_nR=D z+wZ~xz54&cD@~nIx2p;v`A0dDOtm2r-Y<$Wezmo=jg0mlP@#ODiY3>9tdV-y|9+#l z*?z7q6)Rd~6oOSIufawH|3J2!I7Ee3#E#+Q!mDwge)7>E(Wo$~apI7VRx>HzW!q}m zm?aH&Wb}=YpnnbZg^TFPm3ClSZGh(<@Zct2F^B>&Buzw-!u`#NESB(<2)w8W#z#Fa z1TAqD-%*<-w`b)pfutk|fKOH;U-Fp)g4F)oycZK}kQL{)1Z=6*!{9NpWi z?wWFp0-*@%zKd-8A@i9nXJstMhNDx_ri;D&{bo4?ZvnB;B|qPjjzoGluXfoz=Yv z?;Yq1A9oR9EDK_zDh%89bF#@_-EI-?lCRGM&!x?gP3fo@w0uozGiYzBs1^B9{!G)u zlTv}~cVKSQZ|W?_RXU1k)Gi;nh5~)OtbDmxYovZc>$2|D&lfq{DvZE(uG;&bf{6Xv zmOJRERxwF_`tdbOLs7-g4PV@d1$GieUuzX8E_Xqn$;cx8)>>tLWFOB+`{XiJ z9l3AUi6nmz>x!lo&2(ryAvN_ji{WS*U2f0CaKbm94++jp|Ctm`p>Eh!MpBhWL8kt{ zoJtHo?bug%Ldkxs*`w)r0Sg=3#CsY9!M56b*DpP8ftKH=m{uV#={RFl%R~fyG2oK4 z>vUn6+$&?Z*udTL@?E_<-d^jkq3;b$mgy~-A3dNFdai{LNUZ-T-ng1Uf;Ud?Vljla z^{4VgH_sARH3mu+-Ey=#8UWMk7Lq({Cx9nr>}weU@(T@qnjX}CNuTiokm}Ly!3)&cEXJ!H+4aG)DsB#tDf)j>PeJV*189P~6y)kV@B#?XJvO!qi6*>w+N=>M#D=aj zSZlqFjmz($RJ?piF!Ylg3t2>^K-l($n+V$pD|xOKpX<&!@@ya*FxD%0FaqR=L8~R9 z`nDIuYRO~nV9yz6X25?G{nF&8?oVxO59b8`V?W#qcrFazvDtR0O6OU3^A1z5KHY$Y zHJy3-I+fR!w~}#R&-yA<~%abuOz#g*#>DkOInk#tV%L~i$Z-C!IBc%Iu-mks66AV@S z&JV>b%K?r#+w=P z(RuXH9Fx(qOUftjcYs>Z;Q3MX`EmfU9NC6Rpq;@zU~v?&s}e?==cPP)Z+~~bq~aST zYhX*pJ)XsFTJXQv+$%3<^eAnKkB>NqCWoGko|^psqwFigvgp2d1*E%E8Wic2QaVMD zP(q|Z5KuyqlJ4%1k_JUeL`pgZX(>@sLXnmh&Kl$QKYg9^>E-g(hi7K??7h}qtL@Rj z=G>A`2O;PxE1^VRpJ{3W?qKO;am0nZb!7vNJ7CAK+ZV)bhFS3pm$9k(+^26&>{E@w zIljn+J)fz-oWmCLLB9F+mp8VQn93Z(th`ZMubIx>q*JN7L zs)_SEmD+SSd9{%65!6n%XhySrr83LMnbeWoh&3eODbOQa+Md?diDJ%6v&(q_2VXuo zD|{bP%4_pP!4SX3FI$8)1SHSEEr3+3tMU87^N6@>Rz-U`JYpmcPX$EW86U^F^?*B6 zP?F@d(IoY&sS~=lhJ++Wr$WUbSYXtzo9mN*@A?FkE-T9O_KZ2sEEi(hF7dg zLOe$3UTlu?kR6oJ`3pDQ``r0r%5PZ{HMA7TSa7%bs52#BneiM6V8-bpu-^RrdM11$ zms;WgRBFMRLD2(NU(vE`|Ms(D1zMLR-wW#0 z(GX(WCSIK@a##vV3L&e6QwL0xDanyUi<~>6p#AUNQa7_)a;o#0DZADuY5HlSrZ zTF+sGBdzQ7qz**-KMY6;(@$0?cnrHa3?zKp#2oDOY-~`D!ec#`GoDN_V!yOw>~p&y z=41h>Swid_2e_}$Oe4@0MPnTcv^v82-pV&XTWD0Df9!Dtx(YfQ8=G5xYkbhs9ij)t zaZl`W6|8AfQ{($fniQ3^uis!^Jod2N@#9vB#IAbN*t1q$8LIP)Z?=peFCL6=?(VLPxX7RZ>xrgAZ}ajSbn) zY8$L|JtfuZ&nr$;0A^qy%(8yJIE0ftG@*{i=bxxLU3prjf^ks%N><)=R5SL6Gs~LT z$T#&x#lD)?Vp$VU+T8nHs&20)y2j~4K(y7uIN61?PBvi9pQr)86WMd8AgHWG| zY36G4U#guseg5kK`8y-j>^TD&F8Sxu30oZ`Sg3nkN*{x(5@` zXuw{de!#zcQ1OW69~Ll>Wem(1KPGS%@Tj;#ejC8Zb$$cigB)j@eZl<( zsSp04xlDKv1&3skb!LeJdH~!yqLO`OAlwKkJa571F!vl3U|U-YpEj37#=%Pg4k*$K z+Yra%M}ueyL2cw-Y8;vNyjCl4Ub7oQ2Y9xU9;3^|nX{nqo99aJsAiTo>}||wxFR}A z-O_Z?K)5;}cN^g8uPgo)M`*TBzy=rf9MnQAGK_Wm(Erl%nMecU2CSe2d@s=7)t=14 z834!L+UNSWy=X`$FEF&tRz{0)6lUb$_8k67*}J`GXFox=vp!Nd04FWbJ5&r}jriL4 zdCq?X+@zbC-Lo@-8lc&3P0NlQB-A2$295`y8ohwP7Tb6wyEre85)p~|fzz#ZyKbb7 ztpyRCZW0{+MFSKfs;a8MnA8rsH|a+40X*)zb&sH&;nxD6AxkV4vm1a!fCZG^dPy-~ z2!yI%OrQ*{YTP4d6Vk(S&NNnJ%J8ugr z7em(CF^?gWXe0=$7u;d*c89OGdjgvdzb6PSiCy8jmcGRo0HRzDw=H?Rp?wXN6C5U> zi-F?eyTeD4$f!$qs=0hw)opBew$0-F-jj%e1QDmNWpl1=E7TEj$z22OJ(>0-Z0~lZ zuy&r+Xc)flaL|Kghxa9b zR)i2j9#PRg7>X48r?iMfx;_+A{BBmBW5GAr6-j$IQFAMR};S36S)B>-WlR}d6vr%)TMO*X;l{XFBQwK5CpkL;U$Pk7`v zV~UN-0N#5}O*8?)KD?_Fbu;A+sMvkBke36D3BCBEOX3zweW~3ZsKh;x_s4!i^?Lpw zp_d6D>&3}zmR(+!sW%zf!_d7sm|%-o;_P>!@qCVXyAkBy5l(V3xpzQ- za{ni)0Z1%cin#7t`4(N^$CVv5U@Uz>`SETzG^6t=hwDeo_3ly$_|`+b4~eEU_PZ+Jl`BC_%o>^Q)) zet`wQ=lRgj9X%>?vCGu&J-dFHYwNbz8b| z@G=#R?W!Km&>LHt2t~M#qAs!EP)LybleqcI&@oU|@8iW1OA=n)9Ry|J)N>g$GUBAt ztF+Vb&N(N8IS+Lx1gBCy<|>_YXueM&7AM`?`>RrF}jkzZXlG&+Ozvq%}pG0M<{kDQ++Yv z)c}`qqhx`b+N@V}{dygzjLX~4F0}cw(mAn%e6Bs+AsiUr`h6K93p}88wUNVd0VBuY zjj`HA+r<0=Ybxg(3r>rqO+~$-$h*fQgu#rtFYLQ$`Ac~`Hw@6j_X#MITjZ9lvof_{ zs0_`4Ah6U!G90^5#>5XlGi(9fGU3Db-E$f5np=pLQs;K?Wqx*qVa`%w zdUskh&*gv~0jvysDr8LjoC?H6R^$b8SW1lgNn;}9O5c5MLq+Qf+S$Wvvs5jXiL4QGuY$k%?j^&F3OKTG7zZWL!-wKE)X@OAH7uB)1Th+kWT`U~Dl_ zAST9anJzPyy0btN#1`Uk^s&s#@=Gf~k5CuWTuc%3BYB8zn|uew;c6`zb|0?q^2KnS za{m?SC4zZ0F+O8Q)RJ1er*^2p;9$7txH3uFAjI+-&x@jGIg#?x#izl7@v>S5cc`PD znN^}OaQ%poRpd8V1P778FW+m$`mfp7Z{HD!;njN@8#s1bgrMngiFW6JpOIAJ-9ne5 zURzy_W4HcxrLFM%%Z<*=@Qm z)2PG`6-I6sqop=I<^OOe^X&fR?GM!1*}oBFhqre;7W6tfpfqwtc@4cLeSX_==<*K8 zltev_cUR5b+l(SC)(6`)ra{}z@HyO45;$3~O|W{MAMJ9I37_}y1eKXX7nAPkX0TKZ zDhn6y{pBWfoMf^Oeq|B!`kyoQ=~%{@e}=ANI)w^{ui~`+u;ba|hhSN@;&c-5<%HN-odvz+X1j(`&fVBqr%@Zoo*n0LV2Qro~VC4D}m*A0gV{2 z9B*I6wQjePhLm1|);fpS``HF=>uNw;`vRzqhR$P%=hr!X#nC++Af#Oh+ueO+ak=vf zX6Uahw?159S?=z6h${m@Tj&pBh1tKowMr2qX8#>>J6|${ovo%zmcHBwylEvgG`ZaQ z>e3*OE*gc{PL5ZHHEX7JstRLCu`-3vMN(53c|VPWT+Z{D&?oTZrOvqC2SCeVB+*!q z?}xx~N?m&DIjdb<>DVAV>ejwqFxY<`AdaCS<+r%vx;bn8G*(8z#&n}A)T(O&w zPDa$;`e}6eHh8A^w1guRz}FZ7@|P-jkEG1or8pvzuOWbv7zcI>=04(f@&Xzua}NiOv< zIsVG)O?^8^a;YQloR@lf`XUrFlmSG(d2L%ja|B+Kp_^))qzG}B@v5>OYNZciZGA4| zPvJo%xW!}GY=>Gr7p_<_XqXUiy=Y^@YhR+oGoZ97l7c_hJ7fpk*OOCg5I^K~_%+#O zOhl-Xti*059zb^{R$v)4bc5cQnmB8QgOm{ntlk$757MNRc(0aY-pJS&H>#!AiqU6dg|1wVyfOTIsZO|q|IFi6#4KrHs>V2WKMvR3al?dX z$?RvDuYF`vcP~b(+dyv;b(iFj`$rb5$&12o-aVh!R=$LoaoQ-HJUcs`t${Y#r# zNUKUCuE}4i08!3_7PLH2^MmTM7n|uX$_B>Slx>KQp3A=b{I~ub`1%B_zcBCbpHFw4 z9N>5TrdM;QwApzjqJIl~Y=d5~&g?x%bTbf9@l)7$4XUi?a3X-E6D)GyU;p9M0XBF5n-Ojo zTA3v(v1qsa_Q<}Mt{|34g?H!dWLfIT;a?Mr?sGC%KeJaz%hQ7WePX4Woh%6{yruVliKUYpu^FfPMoB@*WV8$zY}}1OEjS z$J|4{(4Qc-KqjmgUGyG((Qt=O5Z%;H$<1s(h8n=F=ZztH8oEQdAUuv+FGfKN4E9eS zGW{xR%|9i-vUvZFtVXIp;A_~)AjYr0mUM_)R0ll7GS4hNgD9;0KIl^sZWm-di>|;h z0s&vRX!$;2vcXMoiudZ(3=3jAxRs8@(wqo4>mqr7^pY)(4o{>uEUG_@<~L{~3tSJ{ zpo||BbPd&P^1|_Y2XJd3<}i*l8p&(86#&oI{~Wsm#H4YBSx55{PG7J4Jpff%)lHzH zPzGBG+M!ah*?EUqzUNOaeS%O(rSG)?Iv~65%oc}p89-Bn8@r5Tr*|)aze$gL`PW7M ze^|h!VOSJJYe0XtUhbVniLw-r^_4&Wt)m#O8sZTNDS7VAc<$V2g?5u(JJy;i7`k;a zk3Fuo$D6Y)mv-QhZ6|6QKmAEwJNk#}{mL121jqXz>f322T(mfnps(bj1g|O!UQ+i7 zv7o!CL?4znP$>ZRXz{>r?;`q(+13`{h6kU;JL&nU6(Rlck zt(y^WV6|ap3Wz}vn{;f1Z+{}ee)b5Q07ATNxxlak3GBku^tIWd&8yec4Y37Chi7f9 z{ME-Ww^15$KCFW_dH z_dSp*1I;tHQ3Dle6F`ZOvJs(cr(N;`sM?U;o^dx92e3hgJp#}5@<5i7uO1@0-h(C| zBx8(;urUy2NmX`+H_?&IIq%9IVgzQw?#<`4us3-#f00b#^%{jqh-v6_tS(3-S4q;q}}@4<87B&ES2)PdWS<3j@c-{aOp(rLV-V z=GvsCKKW!SV=A^?Y9H?KY$pw@2oI61F?-O7dE_BsT9WI@ zr5}K@B=A6wYZgw~g{4+0HO70k9v)w zFB?#iTM%MsKedGk4MMzHOeMARJIpt}1-@s-9p?WEMgCeM;Gv+R!<1qT9ZnQENIOixR|`j()vN!1QHJ#T05Bn7oFGzM9UAK zFLrtA8Ht#2P`PC@k?JIgBO?@ak{TS$MzT*oGZx^hT(+abAek}l|HOjhEiiJa&o-r$ z{RXNEB!dj&^#XQvc#APW{=vTTbkJ50#%U7Tj+xFviPyng@T$Jn^Gcp3-~w~3oevzI z)r*wf{-0{Vs~ss#jKQA7DYG2feP&!606@)e$#pQDsWk$hYP)?1;9L9c;Ukk!5W~>c zlLiKbIn2!pZ|h!j_7UuIBVg_u`&|$AMT*qe6PKvSFH=`iHHv1W7pk3LK2R|Q7l~*r zS75Wf0lqv|CABkkJp&k_+uSq+knr7uT<}UOJ!iwpd28{4u;G-KQS#IY?sXb4d`8+Ko>i`xFg$Id${nklW5WMd+folhZ(r-iO- zbh6WiRR~&|c$3}BmQ6ULQ*;YrQTTbsaQ1Vi#j4N`XP+x#!C*D_AqlDt?;&G)->mpb ze}qk0T27wH3!zQYTnTd%WPD-YBfm(~Me=hHlTLoYhvkaiT2;4v}R2vns+kQEqO0LOngB(Tu3-H)Enj+`kfnWK_BI%Adp0 zP{dxv_QeW!w+jQaz$U)fE=r;T-Oo&ZpI*WRuWDD}(c_H7EeC|azy#7ovrc5+hsl)HBb`g-46<^SwWZ$i$ZFcDYoxJQQn z46a{T#>geP%%t(Y1w1BI@^8Ox_PZXpQRQsdAxW?Z9Eyey~qIO4T1Zp?FdH(NDb;&tQDD^0Cv? zhawjUsjerL8ozyTVg40h&`3-`vz}UAq8Ag*ixk-c9ew}xT!vywG%guRz@G3;2Ygxr zL(T-JX4F5!{TTSlPL?Wa!Z)jvw`iCsS_aVCm+uP4pDJ++>NcI(i@4q?9)_+;y<|{S zT^L0FsmmB4H#`Z7a_-P4$=TL(k5Dp=*69tyjovIr?i|4V58tzyuHly>P;!(h@peIY z6sXI|nE0fBfkAmOMa(H*B9o~}2@=iQ>#}SFY?6%D@k!A>YAza~bl<@`NaDHw2#SSb}MH6^-5m%nEvF{%=#4!ZBl~JB*iN{XjTV)*R zqc`6Fv;qlcQk^ru)}P=xc|F4FJx|RhMR50~H@ewEj8VaiO*}vp2BNo8gl#DV8Bgdz zrg%Riu?sn-!6d<41`4fldV~Ha%sp!8*i1MVp|(f=6?F|X&vPah6-pUu))4yAci`ND zvYOoqaf>&@!=YA+ubt6S=a*+kI6Ypf`>(*PkB;A%@Nq_xE0Yn^w&~1ErQ2!y6+3$#x z=8sqzcs?ARU5A{In@-1^)_1Fa2NnPBIW^a?rhZ(uB-{i93e8yg7TA-@Ke)mH=mAUU z=x6-XE@=Te370;XnJ6Z2XX4*YDzJ&H*xTm{xqRN*e-eQ)RtKA)nwf^m(l@yTS~no} zywCQ%vywlwm>uknXb1`j%(o$#?4^wK^_2fUBB2{*uW;bb!srjgSm}0r!y7b)5T2(2 zP0ZcPpPqfi1*1pFyIoK4z(4?^CwQ&643R9*-@UT@sjE+~o9ILCs-4@{VCqww6jDQj z1M;4gRkig{j`!IqL<~jMo&X329S4#H1Jq3SIPf||48{+jBpw_F(J`w7oJG(DBIFm8 z!_Zo-*DMgkg{c(6g-Gc&KST@y6D`z!3nmt;8(L z$HQR&Pj?P{kR?aQ0_hdNu_3?4UJk3ds^kbutplQ#O74mSxqS>y13LMYA_rh(*7j@rl zW(}>CuDphZc;J}FJ>z}>1^C8f6A;RGRY)J&(m4|306HqQ)-4?9An;j>2b2v1+j1{;_{ubX%_r2 zr=l7{zK8D68NYK+JTLKRWwuGN7B)t*GRW!DklZ>yKb^zW8vDUDbn7~)5eQdcNf1W` zT`Y!Xl4*#+W32*Gc|gIo{X42^-l}c)7o3`L*hnT65_u0XkBCBc??6w}SDYUzo3xQKdx>JZYd@ z$EVt`H4j8RMI#3gNyC}pU+8p)>hO`3RT~EW^aqT3T*0L%iS_J)$&r6pKsP^8S|e0E zkPJmRHUu$%e7<~-Ay?E-4hc7crC)imVbcP^(_P=eLUMuA68f)?kU{7vmU9Ge6_qS> zyq#D0K>7@J*!ld~HCXcn8d*{C=UzuH0HX-C%?m&_VN3?#R071%EZ91=e{1{F#`+!j z_8mhqpbft?KJ@@*x%(w7`XtKG0qE_4pk5RP=B0nC?a@|!5yld^vfjH*UeiFt5dcVv zsCl1w2Z!Irc?N6>mc%#vX{_Dh@aSUONk;X~Pp>%p4gB<;3|_E@hC zPPi*uSy^e-pB}o&DDy(vhCBUq-oSurCvmKLnSx^gAbYBF0G_uVTF~yF9}C}-qa?Ea z^_{X2W)I*oMM<5VI9IkkAs-VaGXZoEk17YEr2?+y^C9kQ?BUn)pdqI$Z2hL-&7Wf} zH?59`C*YJBP245QF-uaSTSl*VEz6XH?}-nJhQj8#KROriKY_AQ%FDJ?`J zhESkNi5|Wg#+84LejtNSCrb2+ED0&AsqI+bzy@zY%rQahvryj|ctTV}Nga!7ztY;` zb_jdI+$igfmt0pEj>ZG=YMW8pNoRr}fHR?282uYcqw7}APGye3U}4Qz)AoZrX(7WdK>C-ZDze3x{u- z0F73#{i1_xm>q<4wSd>XG3pYne{)TG8twN+=s36!B`3P z{jo2cwE*o)Vj|fxFe&i;`*aj*Rx(uP^ZvB;GfCaTb`vq9T$b%-Pb&3}?Q;Z`KaR6cwYCAqwiJQEZCT%412Z=p;#?F8Vo7 z`aPYQNgZLKIf+uQNsIBZY=Y*WIld$c)ce@?1L|%*i8z3bF7`U0K>hTp>XeM^5F;IN ze>+_BJ&RHrMHwC{-eDw%ZT*jc3NQ!A4?zHexYMFC*DdE|J#VJ%*!u}tN&B=Ezg$2O zqAB^(PLEaq9bCr1s}sj~89mB5qheI&cs+-feQxF6)F#AlVD{rsN7wggWq~^x)PE^rr=nsi#HWEHoJFOr!;9`{~OS zP*;1%Q=U5@Ppz?h5Um-dQ_x1$jz_%2WESS@zD#+o+n?hlEb<`ZsEv7woS2xraoK;{ z8k;AvU>j3sUM0iApmHJ;4w=DQh>`9^EzHt?FwsSIxACn=(0R8GQaxV0 z?}%)CjPb&I#gU=eF|+ed6tq`mjCANe4Dc7SYh?B{poQMN5OK#Kh(htIz~|X;6jz8N zFeDj#Ql$cbdW8aqo0$fOm=>PEPvanx&&EOpWd{5a+%e2U)jHsZPw)iSHX>636~Lf~ zD8}8eo99Mx#{@!mY|uK@hgL=Ni)ebxVuF8gg(p}qx9~5$W$Wh0o;S$T!NQCm^gWfM zu^27V^d#}UrXYJjVlL5_wlpS5Cf2UkAi7%P8w707s@1TD5yV#wvX4E&* z6@r_F>L18wjD7t_=6Ak7M>$-btJ6pq7_wu-y87TJ&f2r)hD(xCr1#sY6nO%#Vy-v5 ziY;d0md@(b5%KB<+K<2et?6w2!+17h7heMZ2e~09Yc`HJA6TrV&Iv9+e^$ z9L*BNdth~e>OEcy)O8L&V7T4@(IYp1V}V0~sMNBs!{e5WrT+_q4wx8!vJ3?vG& zV$KrME5ly_yI_wo#v)ZF`?&NmXTScpp1hm4obp$)b~{&bB!)KmOX4$>FAC}TdR$AI zSa?-eWgH#m8qBcj7>cN2b5T=F4Qy48nYUX6_SnL*P~W#3J}=nYBHkjm{jlryNKL8?#+Q;)i8UID%JRu@1nqc= zz*+S;lNZz1my9()6$puFF~8=9kkA?Omk7?U7g|$WVsx-oK6L{vH}=Fc9uq}v9xQ^L zrRrQh{EnKAHAloAqqwwbl?u8^V#HFF49axQT$p3Mok0ry3Ul20c95s0bf)2P6$|5<2gx9VN>@l(y}KBKlHDIaxQEW5{Bz%Mj<)U%mE`6_JPKj#Px>0;~?h zPD~sVf{7=7NDTx9Ak^N`47^iJTYht{;G=MGIKrQo{9yT2!{^N10OO+lylfpiAFtVP z!`RJQuMhUKF}Sp}=+_$?Fhx-S2%m+TcIfSBOd88Dzm=PKTeyDylP_+;w7YF{XN$edFc#OF|N zT9CHhp}h06+O#+22bDx(uV(E~^lQg4?_qq?pmQSOlLE~8h8G~;>b~Et#zyNFDmit@ z!^L>ICfJs}&P(wUkVtZ-sTqZS4@^{^_sbR`f z@@}vSir@sC{5&@zcLqZSH*>4rC&E=L}@P4K@pVfR`~sb;_S)~!|hqa9$Bz-RJc1eTd{&UxBqzXW8*s9?dbx%~0 zQUf{U=dFBO-b;ExQRC46JhohmuMQRM*Y%r9uC~D01#O_vhGIYUY&}1J*aD0J8X-~0 z-C!wF+e}-e#9HG_pbC5T68J9vY1u@_F%tQ6=HliXhfMA57E@3wF#*vh+kN;+pu=CO z+feV|x<-ch*I;MzR+6mCZjaZeCkYGhE34Wms~tk~m!F_(@=mm~vFm&Xd!Ealwa}2V z^U7eheDmgOps5rX3s}$>UN$KvSU~0Zx!V4YfP$gI_qR}Y&Du1aogR~hxEMA*n$hsu zCSAVzW*VY6#j^{s`|rI7Ud3w6X@gG6w*D~a!_xUZ-Pzeb3E#UA zsZ>~mp6eHz-j`-w8#ZQC@51eTzo@YM4O($j&k@NH~7l8HH`$e zSNI-$$D3S1pBM_TC#TYjs6^%?gS(l?hkRY?W*8x#jEN9*DaXL%Yzdg&o}XAe0K~9) zTShP~qYb4RA!?$@gGVbA+^T1I3&d_a!FhCYZ?F7OXpr1TZz>X&$H0|Ab+1Um_$oFQ z`-P9O1(+F?hTcM3m3Zd9IIaI1&p}N(<9hYsFD&|ynV07J)ab@pW21! zsUdW+C3+EpyMr;gin|@9ck55CndJm*0%Mn8j48#L;81lhh5ih*uf*(tmdj4i3^$+R z(51UwEVo77F$)>S1=Xk3qwF4MPjAtM;5fmgl%NG&(!CY07v?N=_{ey@dQUd9@2%nZ z0G1iUlu(v9V}X4Fsr3GZy$>@%>`VjGxSC|9&C9)GNSJo(<}b`~yn;VC8e}qvCCz^1 zqF`F;DM`Z}yWc?d`b`(Vk*b}7+DZGyhDy2}qc5&u#=fVO%p$pQSu-k;^+5ZQc$u`; z{kFvxf89iO8U zHJE&I>Dg>(kyd^fnCCT3{yUr!pH}GqB_RRa4zG|v`Si1msSlFOf3iye{tAin{hNvi zKa>3TKg*=Tq7eTBk--aDqg?JfebjM87y=lz_0OSlaNTW_#JYIV0*Fmm_yW(nE?S7 zhnW+wXJ5WuvVsXPK?QVC&^})mhz0dTGDxfe)4`r+d=2($zyXkRtlo1Tcy++~UVt5w zbC-2QJ}1EcV$OduDl*7wy_%;_iX$LWk>>vtsTiwQ|2sbapVX`p@F`eJa_s0rMqrL}+;s9hIdELJ6qVH61Z_@K?IP4WU=L?Q zrk{AS*|MYEd|lH-1Fnc_JAKrl#YNYj-)_Yr#(&H3)cap~Y9WP}02)%&V$pgK=o?PD zh&d#Yb^GNJ9a@CdQ(fVT1r>z7qcQ{b4PVWnDzsRZSlidwWJ?f&IvW0ss0m=oA^m$$ zV|*n~G4Ui7LzWYnF<<(%U%Mm8M(#GStxn*9Yl($u;U0Kd0E+7dw|Ti5s1jvn0qZFz z!oZ{2{BUIkGUdEexg`k&|r{ykQVVQ_iyp^|b* z83Hg1*{ct`0Av-%2eTVnrlGq}?EPsu&Fn2gGysoM>qSUPK?5*tPYAaQfEaZCk>TMJ0|+3`vOv=9wJzPS zddbj#53q<@N^ntdS*Z%h82Ms%3dJHJ8S)hv%f25noo6Me;s_%!KOcX7GLxMOqtVak zXw4xFqZG?er5YgLgBzwrL$+n_lB7@MV67VgfJn@uC<>!-*gnylZuLM+e@keq{LDPZ zJLJ^UU?OwW&6yc&#!@$Pdctn?h)(ALpo^TYq8r6jGnT5AMKZF=Ed#irAz1Qb&&tSA zBK(AT`8hyeihi&7=}!fL)m)LkIqTyVGvLOWTe=<_ zqUN{w5o#II{B#AcTvsvaDnSmD#CZ}`k`ZfPw?Hb)?+NX!1u)lZ$7_OW z1Y7|>KD{OFk7&C3r1M0Sz#k+%q8j@G!myIWBTC^#m4p%HzBVMm0}>kzq{oE-&chYA z7PJnVR6hlKO3kH|c?9W6^}9F)eE@VZ>O6~HFajQl<{(Lx^1c>Cp)c4W1;P8DTw(Uq zSJ!L~dvHpE+SE)0ZwO3r$~G1E$I6VOw^{3v$*jLZB~Z|hVXYyF2@^Icw?wT#i{%?D zw*_G*tzSj!wp>iOK+1`&f4xN%30AFKS_694GW=NCw+#BUig&tz;78rCR>(JkN0m<< z8njl}Y^7vsTf6xD1m2!k#!c5;INsDlv7hnQBHF6ZvfR~%f+kY>n?lc(2h$<(0AyaP z^5021{*W#f@6w6I8nEO9IjBmRhT$thIt-b^E7I!%)|&Cj&5mmB9qhDk`0dJH=~DAQ`D3vVMEJ4f%!p;l4ykSge*jpp$AIpq!XX~{h=Px+J~J;zjE|h zS%TQqaGKyf0*X=d=&QHuUF>n$PSQ9C*2=#Yjd#bg6eqmGCzB-;aau(Ysmb4dy4936WEO8Lmb*o!ltsQY(*wZ*%{p463oK+v_EWLi)^%U#Y zD}$dx-{7>%d9i7Cg4fH%W5nV@pDkLSti|h@~G0)zasY%xfd?o=xDD>+Q#0Yvq|q+T1K>P4ogW72n-o7ha^ljp~ppa4piG zkKx$Ay&iqrxL$0E|H(U5`twfX>>mzZvCr?Q#yp2|fa$@tN%T_RtvldMqQsp8A!|2Z z3FDo!h(q5uK80Jr?@cH|5t8L~jE^4w> zfZ{^@$2v^IZx&W5!wIZZ|2?hsAXE=W?Akj89P2e;LJV*k)7r0`U6S7Zp7fL`2SHQ3 zUZ2l>$I&BQd=htzTd0E5C2%7$_1=x;uKlbR&f_nmWeX&(oovdjff`2*)A|!P6Ashw z`Becv$9~>Bvbj#jR<}tix?TlvR2f)BPt)ebi3N)in@=`^>M-aJwA8)GTCxlS^iQfgKsw7f{1Nc9JKQ)Cru@L4EWx zDK5_OdBVJ%y<0NpoFlx+?{uS9sFc%*b~=U?4$Z)PbZ04(_!z8jH1{4t8*Vq0deyFj zL&|`vNc0ge1#$lX?C#)x^CK&7F{77^>hFzv{3W3A?Blf$1}xim>3PnYEuH~+nSXyc zuLo=?XNXaQtY!F9xvBqE_Q)vVE1n6+kPTT&mA!B3BdZstqmguC+u*s+ zZDLnX5BV_#xudYuEEfIGS$zv%m0piH)qN1IBw2HT@iy9cmP4{kjT5hxEOB689?ia^ z1?#@Ng~cvQ3&xcvl5OosrwAi^BhGz+FoP=`m5k7c+fBbA&e~ICyJIYmW%iMROra}J zXIdH#_r5th58K$g(1l*Az4}bHvHJ1((3^OVO0IUvYMt7~n>j`IaB{Vzun*tX`~7lf z&t7ewzyPkPvpBo~bf)Y*sf%Puz4-a#6QzRc(TaV+nq%rzzm_QnV>g@~q7WOztgSr59g$0(9rakqyc17V z;Yd#=#UbD=FxoFq$Sz%cL6Y5HJVl>`ny5f$c5nkGS%QNW`@Ijg`~{B7tGTij&u?y= z){B)Fr=UK!!_ssfJ{q`uJaL`B7)v3)(U*c|)-n~EP#{b#Hb$$Y4cY191y+^Dd)?B! zVj15oOwiHdQgAWSM5<9VQr^YVoal}`7d5#z=~i#5Amyj^(Ld|yZhRfTgY%r?Lj9HR z?hY!uLadH8`A5dNpIfILYg&k<+=nW$4YJBJwhld-pNbq+Sm5+zTJsUS&&4Kq?~PM?3!ZLU&7cSGKB5C}f0ayXj$J&c1k zme`1tN`HJvmHs8JAr8a-JRva%T!vNq=k9<-<7^T98x9z=6>75z&G{8zY`OCzBL516 ziV#3@?(2s$jd1JDhE1X;&D*F1v6`TMDb=g+6G)Rf2c;`N)Z)mjmtNvJ3gtcsu40_+ zdDe|RTDD_|?wXy7D_s>o4hLHRyQ`PHB4%ayJfF1%fqk3hE2Axu&kEUvPwz_@p znDNOxr7yMPw`Hj_G4a%bFSX8vR|mTc(Mm&*+GNgN_@~U*)2(Rl_8qmyb}C}@;m8aR zsA^K2sq%*uONeqdiBukkH<)3>hfL!;R^@!lJqvTVw|qOZX(ODl_j-sSjG3coGK8fl zf6Xu3Vq^+t0{`~z?`6p5vQs$8^XV=|V!okkx_ik=B@TBbWxC5SB9uh!fvGLSpP*G3Q zeqcF8`f4@1JX2vF1kPU?o<-^Jll)$KRU>gUjh=u({a?Ob0<)5b4%XZ9F8oJ|rjnKmX*ffBsK~KCybW5Hbx-p_F?%RNm}L zTJqmC8YM)j5=QLiuJH^x!{qsu((;l2$o{o<{)-R%7t?3abpffYEB^uy0i>Z4$W62O zmu{nk{JTqv|Ni%%)JB$naY27_8JU@`*#7}ILjHaH|Bz0o$u`@`jq=APC3MR1cXWn~ zLe%y-QbFz?MF>jqpI->^P+U^TrCBmhPS(ZZYU;F*YW|&V*xcQ?j@D?!XL&E{eYf?* z^I5Ka+J9JpjAs?_j39X7l@XUOGJ01BpBjq;BdL&NI3lLsiJSdTmEcimUY;dBxl5U>}Bbjbt14iha8KxR{y_5pfKuj5ZMb)L*6MgcJNbsp-D zQX*$ivm*+rWfM^AAbNXDK<5Hy(h%DQNJv$$9mPQ+f#6r-3$3nD?gaOuf#M79Xs%7J z93lsT?iXE=phT8l3`VN;@kVV&T#y+1iV6GI9AyR!*KpkfthlLBo&Hlp%qB#&Zwg{d zq($SWJ$e6oBqvrZ3;HU`DPWc`L3JWW0XG>LKMN04MY+%R} z$c%a%0g%O~5n?o!+6LY|T}|;%#^XKU6Yp-p#Xa+WW&~idh8AeH?+om2Dc7DK17Oth9qE$xQvWnfa69|@#nxJ zfplLO2yiVw$4&<)Q9;cx12%hG2x7Rgx!{qf5ArOf_4A++2!{*C!0=hB*^DzTY5jFB5|wMU7(D zuY+3nKAG_2%niyi7Gh*PZ7=Ee@O55@0O(YG1MyKj8zY5;kqeSHu6tT=_qco?i|l81 z0Cif827}uoaTHilH2en-dZHs?>CP8--t~l=0qa_@&MkK9pfvXrUpY?F27KXegf{}R zycBTE>on{^NXzf_z~UY{V?F4`#2yZD8Lgx^A~q>67Wsl3(38vlXw@pHg1-6c<8Ne5 z)>1JdC(w%9IBUsujszix?%n!oT!UO%DN*W9yjhrM6Z9G)1sI<04#D}_u6El5<)q=i zBtybnlg;XnzHHzc^GN-jZ7?2mkzqj*pxSLnN?;0N%-ZNtuxEKHsMP8&(-UlinN`HR<`!3g{nzK7a%cYbjLzI}n7Q z)jS!vM+ISpirjk@3?bKAR6fmZZmsL!a(4Sf_f{8kWNouHW8Q|X}xh;L)F?SX!UM7g(K=lLt; zc$eq%x6eImRgdKu9>R!-#19K_V&Pq+Hj8e&9wVR{N8HV)h<)r^H3!k5sRSz!$%$`k zPo+FNn`d_t@Z&OSF|W3=DMt)tAf5OlYtT8uCZ*zM+JoW3?4SBFh1(s3wyTU5O$sJ` zxv5!RM>byWrzuJw1Rg3_62IMzx{ih4yGx3mYf8OWJjTiJpMYPSVYGD0@@jsS3XWI{ zy?krgQ7+$^)(mZJf7~{Ho~Lq(UewJj^Go}6|Dm;pUln}={`(k-f#JnKRreg+ z-|SD#qR1jKl5g-c zk}-D)_oXf%R|k10zlaj}Zc7+o#Y(?4d#{aAp9k3Vl5l>d4$4#78DT^E31iIB|uqDvPnOuoRrDVp0OgK2OYDVvCA~ zhMk~tN;6A!lgstOVO8P)2RHU!#bv#nXCrA-`j)R6y)1Dl3Hp#XgK-OHpDI;q;AgLj;Z zNzM`;p$?6Y#7q_y5wLYGI9$KA`jz*T#cu^?M^$XY zS7XGW#~(Y2J1Ra5P3pqh!Jds+5fVvXG7A(tZ}f(+xro(*8QX1RS+mt zEbHQ;x~JbpyuVHnHvW?CbTn0Scj?6nh(tskzvY-5D&+1^i(qSotn)sSkb4P%3BEl+ zkIgWnffs>&o+S09U7r-3!Tf>(i{u%8*Oecson4Ige7F7EXDy;qC;E3xmRMQr>oSE> zJ^p*i<~-5`;u_j>x^q;-SSZK}$hxtV=f!df;&`wvFL6(9sBuFLWz?Q363Q9@zRlivK z?|0*oKqN9`P7f@5V61H)Rl+7BeG4+|rfxq9&X+!Zo@Jj_1f;?!6b~gvLV!sWuGuLn zVsQJvU?qqIwu0sndaV81LI}61XD?~m#;SV)2&w2V(dR|g#RvL?cP7>SwS~XgZu_Ir z#8`*c(*`dCI7f83su>U{OvvGH_|g8~xOxkyD%WmpSVAd9y1Tn2q+x*|2-4lD0um~z zbR*q@q>6}wND2r7(k&|8siYtw_0Pwx=bY~!!|{%H@2#@d6Z4+)npZgQGyk0P0EsML z;U!{{bX7{+de2RBsVJK8US>>vD;P47WO8uKX^?w?I*KCny%>kkf_3;93tIx(1*6{- zFj+Oo;RzHSSPk6);;|*>T+`*4$S|jgnr%1-C!bBvL z6a^&}y@@VrD2w-|%x6XXBF9ZFMEc8|)7=*pik9Vp*&P8n2!#OeIC&-c6&?8FDI7f1 zax$&-f<5>Q8al*nX_!|i8yg$Pa-%3@!3m3{msaw@JxH(m;W% z@djVd@oLJ?JI$eZgVZ|bgNB;uD(8Wm{CoCvsb7LB4Z7w%v86-Umfu82Libvj3ew8r z5Vj9eX)r8<${-fN zF=19KX=;kcQ39HRu!Il+OKZ9v`~r~nS9}MiR$`$K<-J5;} z7iHRO{!$yM!KlJH7U@PpuILMWZ$G}gLPYhkC+2CRsN^Bsv;@pM1EB<=G)v>|`yp{i z-}LcjIhKKRH0RMUl0=8`bfi@ImUiLZFy+=57P|I77W z{=f|2ZA{IYcEX*@r6cTTt5;P1%=e*b)-NBKJ^ew--xjlQ#hDJA{Cs+9D2R(Duxleh zW|K|v8PAc?52Fgp{j@nm?Psv40Nb-0?rHM}A0wG2!A0q(%Mc<hDm0h8Vp;PDeTSgP9i(L3Qk29aSix)AXzBbauX72kn1o0a{)kRi9XF zdUNScB>UX@-%b4gv%&wn%|~gk^isk+uGUj!G4>iRSn!n8pm9mWm*CPo5=s9K3LPlp#S^fG!}4dach3Dy9%NDa=pC>RDh_xe8X--j z@$6)?+G%tSHwL7E{3cavutSF-w-m8^gQ^6DiWu~4Ibg-!9h&S6H5q1yeMN*weie4$ z_d*j933nYB(4=Xq=P*`j4gA9bWFEq-Ef`qA*js+*8=pZ<23YsLe(SsM5}U?j^bC2q&LquAA1RyYFA6>6^D$Koh8k1vliRJ!h)Xzhgi{3i9YIrC5_i+^5_oVXnrS=rf-bsb^cgpvTU-IBM43PG2U0{H7Q zY=t?P`8_AxuH9o;S^`vjnWN5Ab45p+v@q{B`G5vtz@e1vCy8J8Z+ce*<|Tx%EG_P<@Z?7A1n#+L+-}r`yYJE-n9__@EJ^Tgnk3g5D_LB{c|7at(wac zHIA>~4-h`q*0S(x6rU^F1QrG7MK^PwRaRT-Bogtq!|Nt+S-XEWe_)qkllhDbXErl4 zI8*VVNj$RRAmj_F(T!Bjfj1jRM<5{c9RMU9iop|5J=Qq4Xk}wWG z=j}X!>+A#4v27{h4AT!_x^;aBbQuSNnw^JV;z=6u8_jh+02r!qy%h-ac#;SwMw-WF zCTtmWB#t>$0+-x5_sARZk4C|Y!Vx|)&IWbu%x~eQ(bJ#*C#i1%P5BgAF#P%<;yU5RjP^~a&bWGA&woHNslckdSqUxh*y9HnHUj7GO#8w zBu(7pPovLO(h{n|9mD=n3Nj?7z^6d@1*0T@HSkq68G=%+R1eSm_ojp=qPTjG-e7Pr z8Ogc#sg@_o%Mr@Up`4tZovEC!wZB+j{c$4jO^SZWqu)b1F1CPSsOqJXd!NK|mdBDS z{&xJ1xBpk^ugTz7sdL04zI9gl@Xc7I!E4u2y(dSF8+xw>cw;ctIvwS!8MZ)asM04A zo+OfyfgXm%m4G>08CA_#1@IQh_vm>*{1Om-6U%!kR~jlnw3Ox(c!xv^%>o6uKVn{5 z_W}PG${iRp%iH*1s~ogq+BXt$qqsy4o~lDRqF>}KPrAISo%8L^imq#G^HpEi|FE;u zYQfdQ@7kkdrJYFXp3G%bcTn5Z(Q_yF`?_-3bP>E4Nu=6U;3v8Jq1O?$$v^fBmmFU`^yD5J^#a)0$Nue$8dEztOIp3$>1u@V;P0aO~9T>UYeJsZ0MxbS}z} zrjOe_y5k~yq~F|A#3_M4DV~Hr!D=C<|M4;NWA9fTyxlJ#_y-8o9 z8qG+(mEZ_whfkPxq3B|9;s;#+s&GvTD?nS2r&D5gxVs z=@$bFrSUD&%v9|a>wDs91s_&;HfQzj(6V=iH~O*kXk0ILei)LA8##Spj6e~Ps%s?I zOCA9rxf^>!43kJ4|1or?f=%F%6qu(lw#ZUO>Q8wg2CJgs+X!%U#yD8(H*dT|@pBJ^ z4dT=`V(SQ-N-&tXu$pueXaXcx`-9SWI47_@E@1Lt+h%G=*!mXv?a?v4uc3q*Y^T(L zXg!*^vlhQkfI@(KOCf*ylDp;mKx3`y_`}$>1V?hmzo5U$!Ybc@S2$EFMZD0Wk8)cU zgLEibc8CM8T?h4bAIGv=jTWl40DGRG6Xhx4l9d#+b;r%$?dx{%U_)wLwS5W$i-kmI zz)lpiBlcPpex>@fTUGI`lk7M_Cd! zXZg|xFumRRY*;Gvd_0Nw?**-o0*V=r?cBw~uH(%4K50R{*6A%l`p<7r4Cz3`IRVR7 zVFn-!fwkSYt@f(eqAjf75K<@ihdu~dexF+b6>PHrAM{}BwpqhQU* z?(Ia)dymAe7&d|g(!yu=SBIX#I}5`{)AZS?r<5g)X;4%Z#ZZ3qDeHg)n&(-#{$Nw?UyJz=4bHSXMOAfxE56hV}?6{SZ&@aub zT5Nc0ZXQGws-aqj-1Ka`hb2;N`BXiIs$ z>FRFNQ(%19X-)M5_$xh=0&NOxE^~QiqC3|6_+M1^uvlmskdQ5KjJ~#DhUo>#$Sc|t zE)#c{xTbUx#6v-qnImYUe6YyET=*Gg?YXEb;m6t69N~11CLm+H_SqhlvvnnMZ=_kt zbcz5iMoI&s0=}i@Vu_3DDY9Y13|yt9=aD(+?zIK{tEOx-NOuBCQ5Fm1fhu9m(n9An z>XkQfpcjN6e+Qo(ev1!l7H6jLo1mf1<$}&Mc&+-%RG_6ukdtAIe!Em-l<|yvrskz} z_4jye&%TKZFf&B$ZA_}2K%d)h5&h!=QA49UAyd!ObNFlgEc&o*1w_~7N2k^jTYnMb zx;4exRKqyl_aQ?}(lFNTwb6IAQAyAcGV!Q$ik!jLX7(3Og_U+IILi@LauXPLO8CkM|Y+WTJqgp3G7nhzPd4H-)4)y z$?x9L(IJ2qGgg7^+L3-4NI`5X3!pOIuCtXrKb+C_#-uuSRKzFeYpChd6;GQ^uz^YA zv+KD?A<)#RN2C;>)0|TW1cm;>XU{^9P59vTSUx_c>P$Y9nenG27ecoPMzOFD?g^U* z9e8#sfBcGd^*pACX8EhMlbN(RlW?bp$*h4(Q7$c8&$QHJy%f{F^^nGtjOrwZxO{&9@@m;O4InZ|L9c|JA>%C=P3xc*${x>N?voCB`yM3dXBj}UehEMFY@7aU z8}uK`g@?yf@tVN)W!K0$Kv*Tqo2xf4iRIu6`ofEH!Vc=E9hfy;2jFi5GxV>jpmpB> zoX7zLKaMkSRq!bU7zXb=%5XT`Zih(wgZcW0m$yp$#gUQo9$20hwO%hlejTPBY+Ea3 zOU+b%GjF+r@>PE#`X}MBN*sJ#A?Xbq1y*Iffz=KSu6FVA2z44ANj|;eWDoy<^Y}F4 z10YRew{ZM17h$1OsFJ|+IV|@d763?glj>6;yRLMaU$(AQ@^V)t7+iZ=z|#WOKC2T{ zTToYg!Q&%cnQ-afn|J@mHNFc7kT#}#~fNQ=FBV#8Ss9=D78AaHH=>g<;D&`AY!`!+> zGqS-4S%6Ep+yPTfWG;mo(*C%A25Wwin3L)I2#l%G(ohv#psfO>*X@B^w8|^=CqO8L z0_qnFi{9Obab+4IpEIq$YsRYaK+psZfM{)_Dks>Z7ye3ryhJ4`cFLoDp z`?S^X5DGZQlkrp0hVvgm8_6sL zIGef??zPmUnnYqYbvX~?->_ZCIXW*H?9o%L5)C&mFGTaH)N0KuD{#IUVCRR-0%$u` zT2x8cd}1hm!qE#D1*$fdJE?dI6ng>Y&AtffVG;w0H!h5qm|jCCoE-7QB@%fH+y(+2aTcCQtHeB9ksk}~X#Hv5 zBA3X8XOk%Fex7wLgecwFk{#X7iohq!yv6h@<}PEZRcyevO(%tHdh{yBQ4IikCV2#g z`r5f!tN0a^84TpN#Mxm_qk4YD`ok~neD;KzixPMm+F1TFt-iHcx3Gur&ZNKaaa8zu z?S^2rf{iru0-^d<-jr*0IF9?}LAjW9sDpMx1!u!bP5U zxT|)IiH|bfj>`;*JGHFkw-fbWUoPkTxo87VvKYGfnhR)mF?gJu!N_Z8T|vT?f? z>Ab+-bDFBJeHg01Oq{R1!rh*d+<~(zOBGPVVH}-lW1=32_EKt{sq6cwz|+DmrV5Q3 z>URTt=ua3^Rg<0l*o}P__}U7^%aw*)d*s|FBC=#n-rECXK!rblz>!oYOpNg=Mf@EJ z2LJaL3Q|1s4m*tbGxXBSIY{0e^$VMzqKianyE2*t`@L++2%8Fvk&V;S4&28M;c7jq zSHVQ3PeVvRs1{3*C&lV};9=T|O^X}-hsxmePYi-5O8PNY7n_|s1ivQ>=B!N3KFXtd zz%0N#bCPU?8gtvkcNtIr#Y{($qb&HVskd*D#369bm5kT8)uJ&*bJ(0pN$74*dqsCA zpZTzuyQULR5ra~jYzTdS7m!+4Q#(6+G4?~;U)^p- zZ?l|s66o=YNAi}xB6g?fbK+j{ zRK}n!e*Z(Yj(5*v@)4`5pGr~8Qv}Dec1rDc2B9xkAkz?TODC86s7;U`!BG6VQklgc zuz8w`fMRO1QSHE8EVvV4BP>LDA+oEPWc$5H)KK)t66b=k--5qKuo<5>mW7GouXCR{ zQ)7^BxnSZup@q)>K)?MX`(nsAoLQ9@F)&>Zh+KmAn1*r2#`_gg*Kz9`%V~DBBC0F@ zU2V)p;{NmzyjV^b`aU;p^bt3++r#|t)6$n=RTYL$dpmX>Fgu*lOB4b#oBn5#ZyH}{ zb8xWvhh$Y>5lH|ku*2ZRJ#i-g&h{jl3+(H!*%uT&hK7bB4D*$6&=L~MNPRjha0iqz zaju4NkQtx9u}HqGC3nt)@vY1Cisie+DWso62vRBm4(Hi|-8eHZHfsD`c3?VfkEtP@ zQN*Gkr}N#-Ia{UOa`m(!=Beo{+aLF>Eu)D7=kf#LAbjy`s$O*$c%|L1pQf|Q@8^Gj zUauPF9hlj!Zs>NK+-Ubi?H(Y);H^pNNu8hMH>bggnqkuhgI4RT9Xa9 z6DT}qdgkjDuV33d9Y?&%tW%P7W2$`l@st$v$8i?416}3qZaYACNt3RxsjJU0A|Wk3 zNj94QQhZ4vMj79bxAx)2WG<(vqPW zkc>Stwp{WoBKqhsTq9-~-y1`zERHc`!a*&*)cG0;if##fsr`lC{=s(Td-ZM+Op9ON zy`HD>^uhkvPkX&6bSN6)u)2*H6-cL00HIMA` zZGlNpRhH5HGBWAi0|^O57%dQT*b&}>4si8w3SOJlk@Y9q@H2(K@|kbDbQUHTNWyEJ z{Aw+Irr2|899yhAoI*7q=QpSuXCC^Pa9{;tGVT6`VO5A+uI38~q5LFx;qibKv|D#4 zd?JZAmmd>LdH=L6{s!y<{&0BCfI~|9jqGKd@Or}rsb-oS{h*YeMfoq;bxMpqU>Eek z7KN9HLR+7qNdImfEeo1|WJdMBSv$s%G6|a_Je~&Bf=UVlkl!oknD;Ddc={ zB}}u7cYoX{=4nm=T09Nl%_nmqiMmzW4EmJk9>jcQjadGL&J@+b_51UaOdQTvaPp}K zjXe5|>JuZRG_%j*ST24IHU^v>x>fO#b(=<8#D^S-a7l85MadAtRv+RgW^1~KU-Js1sDi+X+( z;bq!{)UdLlpLB6#@xQ4-gyc(vn0uYU2too7?2Qne}v?@F{(uJ@hq3Rsa~(bM03(zD} zsLF|-&JUP#9(E>6et(GS2*aMSwM7YsoE^)nRE*p3|IE*M3^M2?-xzST%2aRMn3w$n z@msU@<+Q>)L<>*?<-;9Y3pkwI*$3X%6o^)KuDP0+4K1~ENIiSaR zfONt5SuG3#nRJh`L>h01p00yK-=oDYQhdO8ufgu{H0;eWxaQTz z!EVzVa>3TqDYGbr?LozR26!T%1O8wPQ{d2z2?~>=DGJni)Z#F4bV=62 ziGLdc(yy^M0=xAm%tG6+tPUwvjMT8KEB|=n>c9HeGyaGq>l08j9ZdcxxFT)L#iEZM{>%5!_XyOY|1M*2`s5@x-(ibBw*Yj4?O@1~pv-q(=o7FJ|Az&PB15$u z3~}J;>)eBv>s(KR-ko0zOIc0Gj(_-DBnf-=x0Jv*5bT{NY6vBfgb9Qcvk}Submkb= zr&Jyi!q{*w=TYeroq!&69hgW+cDZgHz$Pq)HLi^MKC92ti1Y%=BZ!Goora4D^(vWe zy4b4K#nVHi(Ax(<+D7Mwq$Z4)18}&0Z|j5wFu!5hIVFQa6~ew|I|NwFZ{R8W$D)r~c8 zxeU8Em+23aZU*DpNw9rod7o7d!$b(0U^9FV6{q$5I4<3yfbY4y=5+!xOU=U(Xjg|d zvt)V`pXZuIk&12Tr5;_Y)!-PuB0g1n1cK8|Sqs`D`gF z?tJT`rVhM;T_QIlJ^?He*r}{CS6ouSrZ$dSKCjLVMAqBAnO82BY4NFSHzoIo4;YpN z4z6t*a5;%#zgB)G>?y|r5awj+2N0L<;-y(CO13zEq70#5|Gv?T?KUCUUx;xM`m>cv zbO}SSMJT2=HK^WA#Yp$uv3a<+POqc<>S#P^#ozHF{_Oca zP>_zBVc-01lb`)XYnSEUg1;dcGU=K*NFiPh8Fh#tM3JdTa0ZRpz%>@@yAVI|} zi=esf5bQ(TSUYp#Fnw`s8GYPBRc(rKjI0lJOU<(*lIAbm-nzLx6HUskEJb`NAZMNQ z8kLldf;y~E^7|eniWG6qsi8=2eF6kkkxN~mI03IcB(ms2`Nu==cbV!6CL%PO)24pO zL|>{1Xc9XyO;n6f)<1?{wxAJ8p+AYVHVqs#zB2H|Z-Jj45P_T`97o;j?5vfnMWOME zskzIM3N|z{);j>lvc1phQN4@TjT1~PQ1M{!AqQrkYwh&r-LVSJug_l$WH?fwgg95P zW8z$rPx2aV6ANrhlzIL(F!w=G3q)N;eQ&B)A)&H1>lrDFXAY};OE?nJgo_!g_+4{x zRZ_bT91jw1(USM$r==$)57l}&uv0A@gRK+cZ8mye7I7AQb+4ql;Nl?;7Y-M)I(eSV zE;K?*9?QK7LG^;;Gz{h}btm3{Ku(ny!CNvdL)1Il2bX+%K2e8v5kMNS9ng=<%VC^G+iQ32iGl*GaY;}NzMA!q| z$X6`r{A310!{mvTQ1SQj+3F2Zc!JXCGC*#Ado3D5QWZH-)viAXr4IHTsk_@vN>s}F z=no^&gV4^rpvJ`ha7a>&@O^Cfldie2`FZy7{oE?ur`?BLuSl`T8ZL51Pw;HR06GvJ zdHV^6$-*=ohgPFLV=@HyB!i;*gqEk8-LQGbl!oyiN0IFFpT>x#8R+rf>`^riY??{; zyJ=xw$HQ&HdD|=)Jq(fyvkWuo(B`0+Dd1`8G37xrQPMrZdeXP3_t#OZ0HzG>m zMZ&cH*0Bn#t9**c61MOB6>jzV>bGz3^yU>um`81W&%)+HBBR>PP6O%}?)D5cqce)C zW2WZ4#nhnvCdBxe;8BZv)1@B|?Un^Qz;}$iPI84`a`mo(ijm-cTGGWHae`)W_QVur z{5cKP0LAHXa@uwOAAT&2xb>CexiEbvpHy3OY!1PJ8gnJw>;Jd?^{wFhC}y&7EAI4n zn%pv`$OZIy;A~?jWYal{)>}y`FMSH1?`RdF@K?2Dmlh;@R^qxWqg6HH&=Jq5p+A$x z5B!egka>X_XkIq-sCln*&<)N>CqJ<}550(H*b16PzC%&mXgFJl2*LfR0F)RJ4$6dR zMbYqrXkd~#bpyudq2a*tgFE!SOQ6uvAjygu3X!93i&NAf%D;9~P)`tat-zTk&br7` z6c(Li!SEV@P5GGwALEko&P!z;zG)ns(k((44=8fle7Y{wvhMLkYNvYovz|XWdNO?+ z7Hc0uOv4uS#F6+w>V0Fme7>a0-~GviT70hmacKH}=nNVdu^=I~vl8(!W$FMfMqqp^ zG5U*b&Guh}b>(6UWs{&m`1QigLvTR{;sZ3H$A(b|{ z9r{!L#b6sWgX5p;m4O-u0b7p2{Ar5dwqm{T*$+! zUv-F2s89*T0GNJPI{{if9Q7#l)m2k|F6t4?wicMgieyu&l{WRsPCmej@%?4BvD?ni zNxRbc`}IsUwvsYP8cU*vLQtYH^x?6uMzOhsTrzk%URSH@5Ih@C@0rr?;V>WTvmkET z!@SEN!ZP{Ejoi(3Mk%b8Y(D<7=>Gc)la3ym(A-|~mdk!4*pe7V&BCI6y%9XTQ}Wy) z%=S#Dcd+| z#iNP)&qkP-VzSZ9)>#-vA>)UI@(u4`2RxHgsuxo}UOokD?wh7nq3-#~A*XPVp`2)FgW`qPlXZ;- z-#ud#|A8QH8$x;Pz6)REstD~qp?fWmIE>5Rcq&Et4zBN5jxc3@_SP>93{N^+#8n(< zTH0j2)h}3In_((NrX^n99*U%i*dH@Ats}xq8?C=n1Vq5UEc0 z&s_`IQ2do~&Yq2l1wAGUsPtL1<4d*?e$0|pibEd_TjPOB0nuW-=e~hULgF>GSD^%l za>mA)`@eBvRPyef?CFVyFakog<{PuIY&cRWPe`iRzH&0mthF@`vk;7h;>VTSUQIZk zpGGP@UdN|((PjMRr;V?1~aR$5(euQC&tL0DEy_>AdC1j#?2 zZ=H<&$CF+_-#_$F9fUB!R*V>EMf1=7;pQ;O*0LkTr?o|WF9%I#Ne07|V~^63ci>;7 z!1hgs|3ukv59adZ{!1T4#$v^PoN9{8BM&$;8r#mkKolJCKQsGW#+a~?4RZB> z+q~~ey^a|CfLIsEr+p8V1CJ&-+;^64Ttmn(3M>rtQ@3_tV#|^6Xp03UWrFP4VZX*y z8O$nBf{ywtoJM~FS-N`uf497|86fGi0Zk1KdAK8Jypz{~n+xKUS3s9xyH3#1h@>UJKsb{KINP=x2u%PRt1SIF zywq6^02%PAypSGg8Wy7LsuXG>55U)FijrmH--O!=rIpzYy8VqW_G7@p06ySDK+2GT zcQ_ROf)iMo*|&ptdz6=K8<_L6U2ugzVbeD~4lKc&3#XLr$nu0>pE1L`G%&JtP9JjI zM>^54F4M7G4axllh=Ov96wLU0Z=ssNW<}4>i#!a2b~GT_Q90+ z(z&(O*(}TV8qDdSRgsnGgb1MwWQR`UB_!@EpqiGDKxbQrxOx zMGJS?!yVpNDg{<$FW6{?7L~F~(RsW*A5im&luNg42WkWukzK;dqLlI~%VwFnztBOL z2rlC90MWB;u0+b6_s?};z2N~$0b)rceu%NM`4(Go*yebx$1-epOl-(`jZs;TCo%yA zcz%OggRScUOj@nkHJGenKh~67u&**cg2Mzpl4mLDHfAd62wxv??~#dEonWM$fWRxn zLq|s^$7>FUuiBFHLgCwCSJ-u8mSU@9a^dx)KCs$>K2MN!5R~?r>Uszaf+%TQS%8#? zVZmB_4oM{M1P0HF%bQD`q6t=jU`L@*3IOHiW0^=u66Q*T$JLGZ=eTB$g)AeEK79*( zus+rBq-QW6VQWuyQ`pfg(X6Rwzod?uY&y1ldOF*}Li87kn=KM|g?p2`HH0V-nthu?!MFzJNVvxSxBXEljTPJ}W6a`K)?x zAMOkoBti(L%+xyEAt;aFFqy*ZZrBSgq~Ohg1@6ol0eV1RtC-jP~z6CFVpMva{@V4{s2f>{jS z5GLzYNlAa$4f7SgwSN=eeuJ>n@#6Qm)S2RVCyYzcTTdiB?BU%d;6=&5%v%hwWxDj9 zw&iMGuDg~@@-NU)e15$fn?yY?5I#V-EA;L%k~AQU-|-H`3Ey8s4WJ$E8rRtkK9ws+ z-vI)Gzo}fK;;q*Ed$)*k;{_}CNBnlnvoPlc;^kV<#R%`u>=ka-w+>_3xYI>OB&@Sw z#7#Lk30#qLVT`L|qYB?9@Ow^@*=ZV_(M@vy^w>pQf@QqfM z3;gpTTQk7pUz5V%s?^sGc`eoN-XV+ z9TAUE9>un?pWVb)z^q^@#L=X+pm{u7Lnr)5;B6PYBZRBX=RFhKeJhAQ64c;}TI271 zBUyvDP`|`bKI@WnfTq*zXSsNF^YiLYKG{Zd?P0afsp{(c)fGLdMoA3jTLcqnaRMso zrCztDAj$B^(O68tWGpljK?iBX4mLOMbjLG%M;xG0KeTvF)Ku&0j}^-w2j10s(jjos zy4Ni+q(@5}m?kgS9A5xp%n;%(j^BxPgU&fLB9Up-{G#E@Y^u}9bn^oa5Q}uTLB`__eq-smv>Jy>y657ah{(1C~e%Z zt>nJ^wG5ATKd%=cL-rp94y7foTFwt`xz$eAe~NA?kE}jY=)MropLMbH_PVn2b-i{N#$QoKW;y(OE7U&8{>cV7qg2{eyS7zJ_bmL zE$r(`EgCi_<5yLZzYz1Dh#e2)2TjG;!QLSOjU@6 z+gsuiTT`7R*jB6|z0i7Wy?f`!&8dJFS_XrVwftAU;SZ`GVV!3II4g_EP!8<3p!(@v zwo6$osNH7a;(iJeD#A<5l+Wm;eMDFmnd79iAv^~tV@b21Pjb4JQ&|4YECh2fWY`(Z zxH9dHn6En)p;+gcF$P}W zz$>wOD(Y`vV;eyQbUX}uHx4ap7J7N;`1Bdkx2sMx zx!Qu)4gqJ5mov52x{+@J#d~QC4r?fM`6c;;cD2^N174-thvS7wS z1%g&m<@(ScB0=r|NmGM8EjmVU_`yox=n!A)7WiDL)xl3m9Tt8Q=DZ~dBTgaP^-gF~ zM5oH2KZg@x86;iM7%s9Z5)S@)5Tl{E;gcOrr1%vfZA~gA$sTVhGKEJFn@D%l27b8j zZUc9Lp=zJb(z6pufIxf;GzxPO%DQxD4wz*+O`Z4AN>~T}G~f!@+W}i$+@)}vU>gm*#q98O z6n|3E|E>x#H{ZGv76h&r{BP9T|1%!RFB&{C|0_X7=~j3a0ZZ5MFZPw6I0s!mN0aTf zb1$Af1Fm2mh#g_k!w0pu=iMjZkQW2V5L)lGd4O6VFB(-2{{x@J0TzH@E#?B=U!vxR z+0xeEiTk0Nz!PKocCOU?oELC(zf&fagD0)`@BDW>uRzJF5aAm&MF$h<`RI|H^)>7n zP*rwGDii2KQ37;?LrlgThLr8OPw=PX=37=8BrM*9`=wf{Vb7>!Z*LDfmaxn88X+*{Jqa-cMxg{C56#68qUHyJ zS!<9DL8A)2x>Mig=)3T^y|!W~1K_E=3QIByc=;kh{3+)MTKw8VQ?O%#SVE`^JORf! zXNNh6WiuQ|*g|)~9{Aaf*9Zm1eewE-NkDjEHLB|Li&5P<0|L$MAU1oL?24L?hV~(> z`tL!47d;x_VHYB)0SD^Xe`~>^yV5AuYYs3^45jeEo8iZIV6X%Oo;$CILXC~!k;z*@ z%nI5PsYBgy@|J)eYf!9<^EuQYrK=&Bz)nC9dinxi&{Mo%x6CM7NRdyTZ@G?vqkvm^|WXL$RLxN#p zM0lJf?uLvP;9F}}Vkl_cvDd@l$m~WHM+*!J@#zAb=uaGXfL6_Gf~#~(4?T820;qS)7^@qDT{P9&{ z%3{r#vUUzka1tA1cW)#1IiZ!~ z_D@Oy%X3jHaK`<-&4j=>@EkXH0>7MRU~8}+<0 zF2q|khGC%w8p$00QwhRv2;1q+y@e+9yl~S~u;|Ri;57+CMn9IHo!6cl^J3-a0^ymt zPrWt$IIW__w~9l1qX}aRqkxC;qY2%4{J=-(Qsy z2|g!juF}xog?S!6RdSzTaf1}idERrBcgNODBtBi+QhsZUS-;m+iN}Q zm_ZpY!=ZV|i>k~thVRy4W-WROhPrM!#AkKclISDWjf3-e7*p zFAr1c`Z=xjn&>y{1)rQ$Z=sLqzD;|&;;52`-3$aQP!DBwaODrW74&Lwpz@&Ab#AZP z$jp54;ssc0_NhlQyjX$5KV&)Bj-UwSNV%u*KK7P77Ka<}eHHlj${OMEvFZ z-W%BFCSZu>Mr<@dnP;?CRag_n{SgGGlKunpFpGWA4bF?Z^^mKhK2% zNK`;~^2?Uib8}bK~s^%Jp?)3Tj9k+`tZQ|0VP^Crfx=4}*@@%e2t)OCzIsRgUZ#Xy% z_5NW2EPQ)4qUA(TlI6FmPDTlv0Lz*J5>3s1PvE z7cde!K~ZNGpiYVjK;k#Sli>Jxr=OXBx%Y`Dn8GMzGg6JvRZf0*D499YNbC-!ey{w}OW05EPE8xfH~D*LGsdi8 zTjI4a^~c*HpgVkM0DBrf^$;@BAY8M;NjO7s?&gOhf`|iKqWw>LDzkeexi4iyu9uBnq$r5nrfOvwE!P>PCQV8~~I6 z2V+-tm9!x?91ZNlQa-zm?I{z5aUYn>kn#gxj?VOSnQl6S0j0V`RWFe%xPUC@VecLy2gQ*8@6S2)r4jM%%W*z0o~OwW6|g$84?*D2rRIbC;gDz)Ipc=VgH;(M+f!<<`1aCRb||SEF5OViX6TUK8P#>-3KQ!umA8}Z3I@}V~?LDSt_oZNpBq5v}vzLw80*FfHMo>rvzX%*>zcQE3JxRE0DTpuTr zObb8t&%d4faBVa4?{C1~o*^uoO!;p=3;#VL9Q}V1M+h#T|BGDiOv6-~-Z!a&Y+=nyzKJj5%tyf0?iL_R3ULfBv>Z3?n?hCWZ|vk z{AR_bFB6l-dvavYU4!2A zjt?DG1}ppl)x!2WMCv9wRcpgX)Wr z_GrSR-|aaZ-0(1a!+Qs+V&k{gN*^wDk|m55X)$9Ko-Kfir~@QlC(h7uwZ+kEx&U>J zeVOe>=FO-S_>+?;@B9W>kp{azf(_NnVx{!j)K>%Jrj8Qvq{|>LL23`uRB{`*z=bT- z)cp#z{AR6wD`@IVfqzrP1J4c)w3J$9|3|cMs%pBn-JT_N?jaHfQpiBqmz+#e2(X%8 z7Lp-)wG23HDH9zYU|yvSrXF2@_rG2sN?eDRny?AZ`a1);f!U0^*Vpzz3;(PY0h4RE zw{6|;KqUGik=_zReKDwVq3tG=qZ4<{%`W*~4lN^7!|5L~YRH?_DfpDyWckwJ$U~#? zm$z7xM!+oXzR&@EF?<)qP6p&VqrV;Ub3<-J_y)u;yPJEguvKJO}WK zdfbG~1*{cDJKg}2z0$d{+I%Swvx(P#Kh1ZN(Ndq_W{Lf%XS&wjE~#! z7DRB3GuH&>4uQb`9^CQUO1&p&w(fEn1)YPhVyQ)%o;*4T7cbn16pS&;3_K5=L^NXaf&aS-Nu?qdP^gAYbXRGIgfm4(H55Z*i;2v zKrDuyo)BP5dYTr>j4H<3E%n36XFI373{^x z|5U9w5?>ZYY%Ky+HMP$O=ai}RqtSI$)wjWTXUkEu?tn-eATnT^%nmGk!L zj(LYBM0y9+8OR{;m0Oo%s95o5z3={;*Pr{8jT9oV;$mVhKA~4f!79TtsDNEFh0`pI z{_dlP2S+<`HIhmHG+=aB-HX^8z=*T8Xw)^nYkRdI4X&C|{$JKUly)hSzZffALNAX0 zVd-N3&zMaZwjKa~CjT5!-QqjZk4P*Ka$;-~#J~KHF#P9yz<~1sSM=q}TgNZ{N-(`M z#dp$xo4blkHs}h+!aUFj!4jz+z_%WRrZ`>e(ca0o;C-~`jNfqxr}&h2EYLcv9E600 zLE`lg)(X(!N*pSv+s)-&7n!L2W^1JR-$5PX)zJ|nn-Ub_k+?7eDP5)Jz`%8ZhO|Bj z+Fo#L_JIy7%gOCvYZivKV|XS(<|hjrLr8q3F*tcD<&6yQwkDu@P2Pg0u{)WwC4=Te zgLDW0Q%I@pa$PG`XW-}up#KV3*}qJyU&dAaBAg=uu{>tazkOZCKrvm1(HO2phs{>1 z_C(}nOiT>CWuMr^J(e!IsH@=r?~#7+g%<*URL~1={&%Z*b;8cMUVpx`W6}Po{aqan z*>7Trs0)3+9ugk57eHZp5Yq!Azb*7?4RLhizGWl6OYKrHwLyGhLTdAhL?sLF0{FLxlu4XEiiACYFJG_DJnJk6T zL-SIi@ZcEmTD7n4<=qF-BEvYsKmsQ0%{+y#woBv(j%}?shofxxtgZ&AhR6F{-Jp4w z5uFd7&W=h+jGrbOeACo8LSuK9^8P=$K?#!9v46%9lyPx-Y*7~hqydq4@dmV59 zQHu(KK8i<)8l`p5^O~_dZsD)8F4}8kKcUGd8ey}6BE$aQAvb6s3CruS$vLsG1CBy{ zC@J9|`Mm6JM2R3c^@}QG`Z{FST>ELhvl!a#MO=M>5iU|v>I3pj+2)k*b!Y1I6c^R!r;{lQ1XSz1wser2dn1>UgXVw<(k zo&c%SEGsQP!4%z>M;moRW99Vk^H=j~uD{w5w`iPw@f|C7-O$_!x6#X1h?dG) zdZ&2VzidIHq1*>W0ar1n+x1< zD14{XQ@#w_cl`R?eNGmEz!3?hTneWjA6M`Ur^1Ik7EI$}x;2cfHv@Ca=*&L>dN;WO z=P}NBpT4lNTW^JUWVu7NJ*CPM@Sx5`a;+9?$46FS+uRaxxaRqIQvc5)c1}{N=b#|d z0JwH2*aS(OA7Cd5d+`GzH=Ak*q|s6DzULo?#p$1ha`KA}kka{5P|0y0Cg9Ng?)GeE z8?Z=FPd^LzSkBGVV?{}N4Y3(YguvV@3mjq;NB#m~LBPgc&T0??OIH8r)C=|6l(%ST zU&T5Kvr^SB;Ynl3zo%hYRzcxK@V4-Z)>V5RVb*%kHXrq&(<((LTjdqnIAe{Kt(#z! zHU&=(7}QU_`-=qxOeEIF+!iqr;Q8~p*U6#t#ExQ>E~%i0wtL9y$N)rq8jq`sldJ~^ z*wGuF*-;Yq8kUpqnkNc;qi zGt}?~B_`57PBzU@21{<;>Nmj>C5Gl)`NB5Dy(tKwyI@o+TvcSu8xBijo9MmnK+hea zQpfJ@Uz4`x+=X9wD--2MqhbGslkd5ibW=`U08>aMl=ea=&l?X5*i%%9*X>^uiy0_j z8u(5bJ*2ZRA`lylwt+0ezwP5sOb&O7f{GfdK)%VBKGxR^hT>*fdlnKnmKT+n9py`u zeJvARg3TP*!p1Yn1*@X@>Zi`jXOO`GO&_CWZg#O6x@pRIU8#r_4`|?B&{9mhQ*@J2 zCL^=E+K?=r5L`;`i_@a|86K;1P!A@1PsyaV@iT4DdaPldn^fPe@`Q zIsiF8(Q^yrj|+tj(Qn@AZk{LC5u<49c!w^r;fBr`6~oqpguY$)0klNyH?oL*K&NDYrvg@=9&?F z6t;%{mLy6al+lk&_5#9P=1BLEWwj-$AX0JwAagB&PLG1RPOznIY(Y=pKLS zC`LLQ-Gg`3j5xeg7#g4!!?gE@YU^i!@f?Q6zs(#Lqjym93LHmMkJJO)Z0djm0D1rb zcqkFOfB0WyG=ExR96V^EPrsR-dq9~S33ZV)s0Z2j>Of8cqE;Z|ZqG396`_Zg!`D&P zA3JC1QXoNq0zNp+(K*3xVh8YiJR$T)0~bH|oOJns%xF$676@TCQiM5%YXEaSHoXVZ zgXLvkn4PTrxJT0s-#q_?yW44A`PQ`g3@{y?@+lYrz!r7#VC#5W1?A20&wh6aaw?(- z>*j;##GTuHR)JSD2|T7aKGcv7%mkpwaNQzy*Yi`Fgr@Zn)G?eUjkR%IEU!@(!_eu> z!yLk*?Z^oWaJ-pD_lo_SdjRU3FA(|^8P}EH;s@GTAH6YpbFpszN0jw1jA$i@QS3Ay zh_3iGII}Gb`u- z6vJlfpT2=H2O!FL?k*^QNC=Zq9AXs`s(_LTq9h!RgCTOc4#S@g$}=T1XuHLZK}HFF zlYuXQa}c`#iE_s<<6`+p{#1z_4=rkRCR-8HbMO*9c5Z$_!QSrVgUn+6VrsTRtyFyw z#lWkkgMteDCjdCDq=DNQR9e^$HQ8tY7*Sy8&%-$il9&}3u~YyU`96m`Mb60P4(u0? z#)|x=Pr-mAJwET}RN!r>xn|)WD1Fb7F{wqFLe7SB+KvPALX@xS59&^&2tlQ}DztC) zV0QI}&3nafRt|Bm4$5Wjb7*hBEK(rJ*Qmxr$F`6;wi<6TaC)r1L(Uju?P z=-g*ijmHzuv-Z6YZVC_tWB>#Co!CcZn<#Yq<*VD}-#HB{*>^{{r?04*83dSsx~gaU z;?gqo0Vp4708ePeMAivLMvDa|BWc7*mKH!xregF z)KxkEg4LJ=R%#)-mABo!(uyeaE(O&aH@c?VOw&O4sJj5ux$~ngS)zK3heT{4 zOgAzXk^u9X)tA2-LY3w%bp#*XlEhL;FxmA1j4jnrOZC11Tgo^{j=AQP&T8gL_=8cdRisLCCbt_SxyCJ6J3P<{cfol8WW37wT*M+ zt1IIkp6!MWj$1nDdY<4o%_xEwK!U=|&>1l$rWAhqU9kc3au={+#6A``XnKgh23 ze`qITmRYj@!kZm|LDQ*_4xnwf+u!GSmB1m9mAt^U9A|$Amf@-2=ay%P+vGTz*c2-0 z_}Rv!hklmK#Op3WI2X@=YdYHl)7CvFppnk>;!!qiM0e#Wxy4OrP@THAsX6kYoEYp; zGgR280O(0$84`W|>&eL%&{;BYhO81NzS4U|A|s*Aw&*tzvxZn=UQA!Q;dwQ4acWV9 zq@&ytWzVY`s>+HkrbX4lQg=ie*ibEvduS`qcGCM_1xgwgH)bgDl#5_v* z=v*p_A->n_CWf4nB6B-Q?`z0K#OqCzq?~+LFkZ+Cp5QM<7hZ#LZ^6AMykEjfZZJrc zqTjwZ6g-icGND$n0H~~bX`~!g%INe?Vj2}^d^jER%lyKO5PO1BP7>NnBzMU-UJ+8| zlntLmNP|`40tAFk&eN0+NVnJPA{8@3@5&xG)r*Y_kW=iGQd!Eq?Ta05Wtv1fVY=`==S8{Q9o_pn zK7xf^q06KRKRyeh#4_TR| z1Z}k(VP|0NA3D?);wS{9f{Hlsa3!td2rwDNtLg=mCfE`h-#9nCNk%KtZ!{Y!vj2Xi zWigF$VoKYn$yT1uISaiyPOBh14$nBUH!`>%yfJ#I95S-vK7Dj*yLpClm-a0>CE7L( zLWLSbNM771Ga0Lw=+aSA^9jPL2}JU$3~XvA-*Xt(r46k*I;Q!Fn1YpjLxm+C?-LVh z3nKARsV>82Ux{=R_rnd|dN4{-4)X>qg4q&nO@r;F{JRE;FOmqE*c@pD+eV1Q4 zjx)qJ;w}|cgJ*m~MoBjMOrGsCy~0uj_p}eOt1JE>htfeIL$K?^X)p4xj0OUTJ~&Ze zY9skSeAd(k;1^UpCLZWd+TTVa4vCY-EK(!Cecm5dBjL3L0}5Q@+qZ5mzpz%-&|p5Y zJmUfzz}tL{7J!3we7W8cKg6bsGti(Q14db zq@|w&SU)+DoTw2k3Kf^~ca)KY=Q+L%uQGtT_zxtM8g*y!{X%hl|zs(N2Myi@?GL>oB^cN7JNRfxP*%DEk`7_=!4l=?oXBn zUe#X8Z|o6l8{!27pLrJpgw3H!@zT`4FdEu!*b{Kl^gvy4N?Feb1_|+x&AloZznA~$ zQSB!J1HA@JfeWzj2Jh|acXuTzD|SBsk_n!O;q@f(cYSXRt2p~XJXBunbC^OTOE9c} zHx4p=VocUPHK+F8 zc=MV8lvV$zm%IXr_loZMv2cbzw6tgChS1eypt`vA@}hSIExqgSBoNMI<=5Ysd_vK6 zJA;NlVg5_6Rcl%#MaGIZBbsGuPLupM7ME!i+oZUABwvaH&rj#hzYr^sX&!Z8CkMei zJtiE<7br?q%fUtP=%~R(m57A@!$JkEag03xO{H;GHiMW@tdbp@)3MPpp0R(W81w{g zk6RDm(kq)LI|~?4bP{D=ksgInXvrtN z)HoY#8Us%;emXDxuZja0Z&jmo%U>GxByti*wd!;-vl*_}I^gHq0)6G#3~j7VN98G) z)U8S71kzyj6QfnoEOPm_W-}PllJ>4F!Ca&VO{Z(6T81X(#b&#p*eOuO$zE!W@qSE~ zd0yZ2g5p%Js*GgH_Ze`6!W@WqV2`V~lp6vKZ?RAZwE2O+;7Y{phk=(_(fp%vi=R$Bgpn392UtNS7zvU|0&Q64ETiM>JB>DX za@u$A54S+|BGkzqzN_LOC<3Ktl8v3%7Sa7mA(5kA`#`JvuR|<@lABg>QuUr?zohgd z$kzv|<_3s=kk6NX2FK54y*z4&SvQHarMQM?iuF>K206dD(z{jixZu>|e9wmsG5J6W zS|~y=%41Aj0=T`KXD7)q`zV~^>QOCoc2x9E0ixxl%O1%zIJ11ql-|jxlbU2Gq&M22 zUa`u-nP7gU{frUQVVwTF2QHc5QNp(?avE9dD07ANDtt{_jgWNXR*UUwQp!c~0t)BH z6D??QW6|OCSN+Jd7=+Ec$8--lql@&19Rj4NuR6H!(fq{%CV9DPc0MlN8K*Cg?3$+H z4O)6t_%U9^@B#TA?!4w7Z^~UcU(!s)FR_X-s~An>*M@tfUdx#gz^1>x>~blGjX*Ow z{HtiM-F|neIE}L(IHcW+RPZK1!k=C_CO<33d=EE9GZr~Ssud9~nBNpjo*Kd={kWar zzx&|y)ZtGj4L>b)^T_o1^4^@F7((b)!!KN&n~WqnIZD_7E-TIMSG2_^C;!1A96*-5 z4|Aj-V{LzE0wm$;V*O0NKrbE40v!UOrX$m}V$I}CpQpIVL@I|&p+bMIJ0!^eGW=z^ zUG&z!vN50`;Dm{xN>L&v4YKnq3L*Yce@rmoi*z{ub$w(u|2upGli1T^#b-7op5srV zXQ1YFLUds3pwtagp|-2U_T_GrAsr0U>QL|qzF3nA-%(BH=1H$Fa|Mh4v&bULW94*2Rm$_^xA z!tiDR#_$J1R@qc-?a$Phyn*sCC10Q$zZ_!KD3wFGZ37q2M^8ys`3A8u;QN}TmY;oGa%U<%&q>$}8 ze_XiEK?Z0FJpAsJVoLB)Nx5lJ@LK7;qai|*flLVK$2Z_Ix=kVd6&gxPCxFtloB5Aiv5aKx#^SBQk$>ugTPy8gk=c4si)42B*KIZ`vcA6;^%D)j~u6#@Z~4 z1CoNGW1JjAx#kMqF+hBB`|9xi*t)L<9zdldh-RaS*<5DEdI3p{TQ5atQ6u?wjUu*k z@hA-bFpGa_#`SFIZtz#ZEAHI%{F{%mW)uf_+@PjOg=VcqOAfRB_gOlCfWrzrvm56J zH^BQfAdbZ#vZt}OIT3U#&|nHv^t7yceEYbT_zx1J9X#T@?PgVI`352#)!IC`v)GaorwR z6mx)I7ya-AjPkSz#JrC9zZ#;8Nz8up`LnflJJ3CKnyDI!Y}l)VWh-C{>ZkW`^yQ>O zeIrbdB2XU=syWz@0=R2l^xspT7s8ipcEWiq zyRXB!!8I9aaacjnbdap)>hH#^p<;WW#9BQCD$TQhS$@EUl5=R+=m%QYX7YoK>>ya5 zD6@0h0qCLF{WXw5;G&RJGev_tNWITh-PeBS_w*kz7>R9WiZzmHMz|A$!4?wpSl048>oBB38uiJ z2H3@O9^ZKC#jG1a1I^t@Jx1T~$$8f&p@_a1J-*xi6A=2pT|YI>d;I`k=Xpwi{)==n-+rXOf_4KvegPYpD@ z;G0Cc;vFS;*f>+L7XO0Dz@(s2(U<-OnDOBD^7cD%{qh zCRM#3tk4{Bg2XEQL!hYrnFhvLXfq)8n^9UOoh@B@9SJMO2>s*>pyW$?i%L0Oj-OAH zAfRX$@T;Sg$Zx}o0~ybpW?G1ussW`8K?}gtMWZL1RB?hOv6|4AGmT55Sf{G_3%TC}?cIOf(?uezrt^ zUaCm>Au#c>n$r{a$Z zJpFkmYU%{umGM!9ImBOMGrCs3 zfY*+Tp+Ur6lHMn^6fZH-?xpD*2jr`ooBN9w`Z0`ApxJmw=V{9#r%sL|l zlXD_Ay2HnK4)Q7&<2%Upw7`ebXfIqMI{z_JCsYHknJI&7?@#tLSo~zm172uwz@}Zb z_Oyq{fs#H2C(9%RR~mGP&v^DC^q00$>lsQr-M@->9XYl>4k$&(Psqs7w$$M$(qek* zHsPmnR|gA}fC8gByjM!qNA9*(D=`mywhP5Dk!P|Z^0GpS$bBi2e%iT3K|i-{TLkbJld0 z7D>K)4t5ynZ&k-|yR+xOJDt3(tMP8^g(|8KLNX+QD%sXNIoca{r*ZR)#>T&H2MZxX z$FS-es^DnvgFExD z3NsWoI+m0311l;Cm-;2BpJymycNH;<_9jk9o_1Uq*dxz!wV@tGJE;;fnBBI@SedA3 z`1D)LOe*f`XET=OUtizo^?CTkeg3K>s}wM2OW>OJl-+~UJfdh|c4C0%FI(;uH{(q) zixLr&R#Qv-hdW38z!z01S$wj1y^{;G@tGbG#p3Hl-X$UzId!FU>?=y)h>8QTnP($X zo}5H+YcNLZ`JSI-5;p16ZIlq^p=3kcz31~NpNP6V3L}f=j!3llyV5%nk=H&T2yRLi z)Nl;EXL45dU_*m5x0Qe$gP^-#f4XyNL-+OdIv^JA2aj?4phr-WR|Vbh0V;Xd?FbfD z1n>J|nt~~-`)~Yd?_iMNFpGfUoO$d0YF%lJU%0m4`}NISm@LWG2t9Myu(t%p<&4&i z!*(>{l~}%BlIS)1pzVZ*z4$a>^`!HGuT#Q#j2>7UW7G+Vg_7%<$Mb&;DP{R`eHc!t zDv4<&JQoauRdU%`yiP*u9wU(mdCd!KU%QYv7v#H{Tk=&-3 znaQiub%C>}jufV~=dt;wVn8joFfJl!92}HAmol+Lu7$B_Fa(<@;xAiTI6Hk~_SNP12K; zSTd)e`crkp?g4k!36Nt=>3?Ev{n+vN?4+kXrE^88CE5rzzB_Qeck*Syfp1o}l~S$R zVX{7`<}Vg7CllKdthS`_Q*<(e_GOv){nOnjAC~G+O@!f@>G==SU9OfTwJ}_QHCoY! z6b@bwNk)G7-MrCSjAbUwHWE(BKsEAwnLchGo}BU~X6m|2)UrCVop%^YR~N_!Mr7)a zGV+ez#x`AwVE^fvXgTOjx>y_xZ-93ap>O% zNQc(chARUonhUF7$d`hA02IE){bjRRae+*zeBB-i;`f#UC4pR2WDv<8Bi$VKusD*xq2)dmyaq?npPl}gap5$|IiQ&kndA?LU<$Y&MVzOYuyL9@#ZcpeoupC1=6Pn zE_ss7unvS;w;UZ5ymHdh0-wqAR;4DnkU{-VhEAVpaEm-T+5D92(lJ<4ZprPG7}XF| z+{y{{*<&+%WZ5GZByc&}T_2MvxjHjW+B6+e8FL~XZeTTw{T&uEvE@iTneMC39J)FCi)Re-8WaS zW&h;h)#zRO+f|Y2?a*G2pp?hDlpZ9~HXbntw&Iz%C{+gZ!Ni$jSz=Y-pt93$4p02Y zL>@`-&1{?o5(fwhFt%}w#?$wB<+16c((c-f=a*MZ8t|&F|UA%U**^{ ztE&ikMP9!f(s~N_iE}579$2D34k6F6$HMkVP8-Ji%v8S(U?t^4K+~6r_Q{KsntbI1 zm%#QeG*Yo|r+DsYEC54$k%Cso2Ty@uw;?>+C3+O&@`lBBvN;)t3lU(BimWi+48i?Q zWvi?EU`kmUSVEEMSU1g8I)KSu#Fjg5qP`jM&ryG+!|7QtyI*jJefV1g?D?9S3?4nfyk-}?z^M~D zqNhxEWp3s;3j3;*xUoWXE5uiGb zyRm5VSJp(|+fyZUKZbY3O0Mn*8h&qmQrWcZ*JJ&XmS2Jy9&8E}4uS0pF2OCoBvbEX z5{@L|@Y~7wPUZgbC?^pEbAg8w;48D;Gop05UUK1b`@ga%`d@ z&bVW)*|EaGQxXPWwskr)&PDymiN)y!t+1}lccEzwY!VtKdD)!{vF#GZBy>Ev;5>eu zPnvF%I4F5SY<6D1AK&PCzYh4=z|6)qU||L1%k{$}1qY0GQ~(xfo^3u3J8WAc@L3el zXuRK}9XoH58$Ju^!%S@fL7Pu&Lu*$ow#j~2I&^VB_jA$~T^T8rYZs?DfE9!keH)}$ zHzs~YQpuZu=Ovb`yI6x{1^MmZxsqMu!H5Q9hx@l^dmDpSIA+ESrMxDWBJIVBP;Rvj&tZa$2t=C zA`eX*YtD0Sr*{q;@hdzn$OG9P`atfkjHNTyAuRz{F19k2tXHI`M9?h0tna{UWKSH# z2Kfw3$f9I3J-(8SDssH1r@qzt2h<^>jE(gQ?G8G4$!2^iu~i`Hw{SmgUMXro#o=B~ zpJLWb%L(c2f>KCISTt+5)FCsFVW7^XTVg|Bd_!?J&T#`-L_zXYAYVz(b@%H}2*;^> z4s>Q%gapQZnMHz=sU>RhMmgS3NL=$>&E3%1sD6tPi@fW-Y%q)7L*U8QI^i;dMk;HK zeuFynE0s+XTr944 zXcLBR^7m}dv;i5|ff)mc$85JtNET(-5L@%jvJU|`y+py|2eRptW$(KvSg!R(4q}My z7K%wPkv}x}Yh0MWRTQDzAcw2d@_!gk7i#CDAYL3Cr(u)-!lNz$ya(7g3T|bR9Y*CU z*UoiYU_Vh0i-VW`2m3@pTr&TS;QlxH{=e+Gq`bh-X$3aqLvpjKOMEKnkW@b{LRw3s5p9mG1RhW`P1(Z;Ls6|geYYx&os7KDPI3QmDd=!W^ z51}!By;4?eOj4C^yJ3Fl5p@X$)|XIr)2Bom&g<63ktu0 zg5|dm?y{#V=e+5G~l&XcLzhY1( zoPiP11r@`St&3=|5Eg(O&&qXc4t8#C(-*N#Y08gxqo-w8&kRe=X*zVvO`( z$omD{OMr%U0Q#W;^=t{q&{jLV!LWQ#YQGO?I}ptG8z$PI;PHSP4EVsu?rw1ZQUNV0 z`gloaAzr4NCyPDq=t8J;q6pO-sN+2cbFZ!#$vkz}tNSiX?cS zLsnmpL9q6FFb*Zl+}*I(g1|#kj+p2%V05V}4x0>Z!z3LzQQ|;wfrHzY!4yJ30(U=w zYDeJ>D%jUj?LaCCFqPo9uk~K-f&O&*&Fcc~bPq7~g_&g>N$(KG!R2F^s%PA^f+f1> z63Hh$ovu-W5(5F9D`42h&Fci8nGBX7NEz;?ejIWFbOZ@pG|<%OD1l~^LvMXe%WIuL zA|6d{+%g~JHPbzChemWqM)`!hGKJ80_JXh&aQk6 z^#}@Pg$(1RFQ$5Sa8Wcuv~r{};2c8z?Ow+^6W41B2XYl|gf4HJuX&rB+qdEx1*RGk ze2^O*LUKK%9J4G2bRRGs2oK=@&ACItJv%=jt&nQ=k79FK9Qb%B zJVX%Nb_@u2QumB?f8!96_{3m@pb1aI3^b9?G?F=7<2ew%gug=`uB9`s=8Fd?#U9NH z0BehKaLm$OC$FI_a|Q4hiss~5*c?tkbIC5udShhbGrzI+?H+O;YPN*(?olUtY8HG< z)>6NqfZDP6@ZRu4{@oX!73@3HK&W#JR|$0LKDDkZonvW2P+Q48)aBj#^z{(RmW32Z zq@)iNvh2juQwK0^NJ#%B2qW8#oWTmmO4;5NjLSj3^AflaoGKh4YHzT`nWgw?5sNE8 zB@Nvd5XVf+Xc|z~9-093Jtns9Lb{BM&U?|5e8^2N=+~%i(2t3 z_$xme45od2z@>n{BrUHf{Gi zj5;Cpj=o=yAcikS(ZrYQvX{Z~qU3hti+A(PSE}8TFu!)^yzjolCLm0dF93{6+}dnu zn`;ScCFfGZ*}$xYxsu^cYS9!i5(Lwg5Z~$u_V*496(k`C*r_xL@%0B)YJJlEWWK_gJD}e@)YVNy9aE+qmn~Wz_<}(492* z!G>R(GCJB$GXcb3KySTIaFZ4uPv*P!D>?K;SD$bRNRJf+()7>^bh>lf6*IIUZCJDz zwqAa&!fJln4_n&z7>9$a7D2?yP6skQ8J=6>1Eakl_HtIhex+u1M^~5>|1;A_mLX5; z23zOZW!eYNEC(*#R_RWn$(e{ty;P?hDq?oCdiKslSZz_@`_P@=!O}5~yvuZq__1`U z6OJo~Wf)K_S#<+0h5d5mZus%q zUaLbTg3_-e?XCBRlgrJ)e@cX9OeGCRjL^+&ZS39SbTbEe!Kn-MF=k1!(aJQPnKx9a zrFtn$+&(CzqXJ7#@3{9;#BhxTXr^JHV#QbAUW}1rGaAx8%ek>>NlURU<;N=NfGuXL zlI3AdCFN=C6Gys^c0lMYMM8GTzs>%Q%F-_1ci@xiDE?MWr**|LsA|gMYGd$nS=~v&c$SYZ1v>g4`vUE*x5zwWgGi{_ zOp=I~58f+NdRlN>PY7{``j4=WFzmr7MGM`7p7CK4!!7a9>OlAqR3El->_SQmCkoZG)?@nLQ&EW7gWkd$$PuTN>(hLx?dK#Jl}K>eeX@xt;KSfm0(fqR{bCyc+PH{yo%-et5^>?qh8ryqqe z6=Y*chPZ2lo%bVXy7=B4uF=zFhhZIONi0^B@0&d5_WNluAa}nP&eRxTCDt-^|EDO+ z{R(4cwU)4G4m1H>k~kLrD@g9%@g6G!kM@BoBB~=vUeA(4c@G{)arhCk$@oz#UW`TH ziXv{dER5tI6Plz{H9gdODqoP|wdX3I$k+JK3K!hLsZ;8cWvO95WWh(MPz?&S(dn$6 zSQMe)cxU3L!ikWWo#4jmI)ehPT9O4+Fs?AFMvn4CIZ**F?~z^M z6QFg_aamlbPLGlvMRF&)xNT@J4=7*C#;|K+ktCg~BbIjp^`_fUmiz$U?lckm?ibg& z(=ORF0hkj>`~-g?{zo+rKYgTI5E)i*O})Sx{m4j-_~sA3^?r9P-w>w5JS?MY{rp&J zG!qqcI-6?L>Xic4D4=JxOQRfVK8Uc9)lk{CB(l~$Iz%z$fwzv1w6rGAcxrBK4%ijD zxx$Ct21i7Fwp}*b&%gwWL2ck?nyT3vJ{I`ZQK2&bL{rn_GQZ-~+kXD6$Dh4YRzJ-! zokYF~DC1-_{l@U5{J{e1#^YU!a3{D61;YOoe1qykCR>eLz+WIo7N#v_&=Ry*9i?}N zf=3PTVJT`-&6c28d}!3Fq9)`pD`h+ahbs#AhdJ*4=h{{fzQx$5wcqNhs=AWuH$Ss9 z3Bp@iCxyPa13fWT{4KsSiMq*7+3wyWVU%(c9X?gf1IACx^sm*2&-O71XynRr&7rbf zWw8c(1b{A-+_Gf9ht8nb3hyeH_>`GHS@1Gm2t3L*#?zLDGkt^Qh3uMAzNgYA?EY!& zIITfXP>uv=-Qr)@bnKtUUL+7r+`8)Ot}){=#WWoZ!&w0P1ZqwHzaaTm=dlK56{knQtZ2Fqh%(X!zE=Q!X)sy3&xA#a#D!g+hND(Rq zD0JxINGRTB3l)yTgpf78!@DK`qECH2Aiw|-lRuZD${X%{L)%P1ZG zdmTj#m|?43?X%i;{8a5dKr1vK0fek)bWO+m!OV!o6QG zWGjg{ghK7|tQ8Gd?@S5OuWyBYnmteYZGG+>mTHyQ-} zng|I=t3;jp&$lGmy4plkUGYz|OQ@ltml$i>RSj=af_DmsrJnk>d z9&5VzEci_JPzfW^a~WCEmKnc_nYRX@+yZ}1ydO0%(Ji-9qxLV&X6%c)OK}2$98d5q zkaRWdb0|jnKy_>#EY#V7&ch5g2hkF{@qid{h&w^C?FT8b;Z;yQ%Tiq6!P`vs!%AVz z3j!C4tYCdv)(`FkN$-`w#6A8|sx2cb7&%})oP>n*s2o`F-1P7J#(s@UTlFP7?YxHZH=3FzGNkJw|*b0+e*=6gnwLTmeb|L z#$n>NaB2HOgN|@9GyS%>`E*S9BxbvmsLUwFEHY{j_nCuQ&z|%=B&{Wap^In3YhW1B zaqgrLMf-(61r``76NfZb;XIi~>c;?IZpJjq3_*43t}pSFH+}(6gQ52NuXV!oSjv0U z<+k|s=$J`XFj)>=p+`mlGFB;ip)1XGCZR@Kc(Yjfq>W;KhI!%IxnhSvQkE{iPL5VZ z>+V`w(UYk4^l!CXl^Y?OpFX}=XV>rV+0U;rUTg@;;8|Qum!Bo7KS}aAPHH*(sG@}> zo^!R0zJ*|8k`gK%^;p*4nZ`>kyUG*g{zz(zHzDbCZi>5aT8D7nCVVjsm9d`0DKYxq zq~vq9pIOm(0(k5g%lq()KB6be{Bf;E^e7u9`*zbpV@7G|CYb;3uHCwkZt=b(x&dQK zcHj^9rkicEid{!{(dWU2q>37;qOK9|{p5+04L~RtK6f>`cHPL)XKSG6{{EwSFONbHguWOPoUvh*eK>-Q}}L#dH3Q`+BbwR{yH4zU;v zNzl|QYhfax;*V~*8ph$Plp<9?k@IE_cAyhze_{0U_Vycc7ncD4I_X^F44cvIqm+`n zW&RUYP1q-3?-D-&*5W??b|(@mSO2is2nE~U0*;>Q`g@2e%;Rt~+4VU5H=4sYZm08G zKG{fyIt6I?u_%~dU`Ggv)I+?`>@ys!|HgoNj!_^GQJqG) zMpo6o$}<$3>3^E(hhr=YqQDs-&HK&qI_T4J5}- z&VYHtq4@4*b}OKPJpgO1hTLu)hN2#jn@5x7`AuzLtVs$rF7sQhQ((`-)YNEc-IK~!iTQI6<L0R+4KPZ)@S{0L~&D z940dWs>t7Fy7WCz6N0osiTDV1JXB*1SX3mHP^VfDEJ=e7aIY5w1uz`uC_T|9R7x7W zn9~{D26mImbx;bvFk|&Pg{GbHIf@N7cIyUl^_TMdxIM6gzYr|k10S_V6QzuM3Dh!& z6P5tDKs+XEojbmjgf9llO79%y>JJs~#0Ly_uwUob%dy%`Sh%p;hX9jdH=x43q8vs0 z$AyKC3~8PTS~#=|Qhxiq0~h7r)#T4pV@6TXkM!{3MZowE_*?dHx_Pmv#DYsw?bY>Y zm&34H&!42@C;Yd{iT~mxKCUmhX>O_S2sLC=2F7)$(ZVn@M zCW$0C{)p0p!-^=d7MAmWCN9H>1w~4F0Xj*3i8>*!+pmG3!>3R{{zLg8SYn)lMtz~d zNQYiUq!|}xXAEON`LoxK6-vH~amBue)*Gd=R!=td16Ns;>wDQ!&8){8s7RD7h~L>b zq>KVtr#Jbd5&tplAj{{VZks@Wvlv4n%0`4bzFN+4lD zv6G#Q<6#x*nC18#N2Oa?w_7~ckpRT`2M*#HIB!6Frx{Spp6E`qwrXe zM%cp70a^&Fvv0Q0U*p`JJE%g7i)l43lYD?t;AcwQ_VT;p zn*w0BJQyC#rKqxZQFG*CD>)}=YE={fKvvEjPPf@pM)`b+D^HxWJ-;*Wp@IbSev%+{ zFX6_K+*P^298?#b!JrHJBAu>#WV9yvz*g)e(ACwI>Ir+Y9Q>l2C+rK(kG*VaRxv+% z;$NwbPTg zsRrOu3Yc}i-d;p)ev9>|ql7kd~K>l@aiVrAK zXj-8Kn)pY;xZTRw$2WoA7qVO!=+Z6SJnlTMAF#M*=jo1{Q?|`k~Q+ACpZn zSq-I<>w#gYVglD0QX6XqQehL1^UtF*bSPQqP$gs**g`~&PvEn}yBEXjCa5eL$5>uj zoxN#dZuyG^d?YGATk|ZvQ;f`uE z%r617j%GxIzy;~4pz&Z?60C!~gmN^bqs8ByW|`FoEd3X#x{t&5-EPu*9{~*r zm41m54vmeCfwc$8^9@M8gl)iv`;5&=&w}mqA+W@~VGmk$HP3-LYBR(c(txA4pBdrv z>-+r?uw!bBdA;byOd=Y{9?$UpWovYhRCK-Z4GdVX!LA9cyU~YlwWMF6GD_}C4vS&$ zcwj!dsSn%Krqm~u2}e5DDUsUH2SEMPdkP?XWn|=4F-L~aihiUSjK-U;n-_WPlt(*M zFD_qDiR_sxf4&e%v92_&i%IVWdfM4UiP0?yaH=IBq@_2b=PTcF=O1uL!_Q7o^$;)fU6yxm}@;^{D6fYD0q;}uKl?#X{kvU$DgLkQe&$;mu2X}jV z5dFsiML=K$jq@(^B&Y8sB7M99Jc# z4lCn=@U^xtbo74d7{qVho(YRM3)%j0e@yUpC*hkyZ@+96nuIz1%Szpwy`bAaYB~ZY z;RMhi6}r5iXCMx@>1%G5n9jeeF0RH))$0{Z#>~%6e6<57AM%))W#C35>VORKCp`bP zbklhUK5Gxo4l#(%M7v;t$JcZaE3F);`P8_}3|s>>KQF~B1u>E7Twi_T_B&`kYiSs8 z#?Q?G{Z7{?-|<9Zmn-<-24`B|1Jv92sYy;g9LBEti{fm&P@a zXdUGhiHFp zi08$KHp^wJ%H!m;lBvg$PT~*}{p@jawO(Ohb@TNM4U%^nzC>vSbw+$734_41($|Z= z$CN@ioH0RIrdS3!*59V z?T2`@t^2SXhIGj6nK47}GY8X!a&*sW8jY!aVaLi>8XpyIUjWnQ6OJXGO?)6!?Y2Qd zW|@pU;W6sOdtdLPLE9M%|0B66yd^ObnL}JpnVA~M`0=Prn5>JT>{D(Y8<&GaI(RB{ zNv&ML^5p#^S>6;;1;r6upWw6*rZJgxY3^ZT< zGUcz7tl*qnGg+hv?mRpD*}Rrm@c?=J zX_X?=h+U@~iDzFR1tSE-zaPDCg~oJ+3$_Ma^?jVlx?838tF**yHspE>88b3}x&KApt`3MPVlK=m)}y9(%(g@r)1sId?2N+O=&Y$C(;|3VrK6 z;yDx4D|xK%UIlhpX5F)4?0Pxw)Po8E>{AvhyZHD)AGM0?7-s(qw^BDTbUaD3KBa!q zb<>C1m@)IvYPYv3)dU=b+`Ikx(of_Tft|9H(pP>#KS|tg3tdbtSp1z)G!ls38RS{1 zYf>~@9J5>ZY!*`^mE{7`&rde$O;lrqX?+NW{ioLnOYfFe$akv8K8RNHJgtou#%Q5& z9b{;&J|Iqc>0L;cN1IQ|s->nTe|?BKuj?^+MMpZAe6Y;@La59)S^qvmW+%e=u6w+m zi*R&npZ=)s1BdzdGn|-sy%)cSuS(6Z>eHuwTPTUUa^_D^7eH8tjM*%?@T05xM7^E+ zj{Ak~$P3m)jc315p*JeU#4*?B1mA{MdupUeBbBVGonfQZR7GBE`ch%Xh*oh6?~&dC zyn8#@$f8G282k)6xkN9ff49Q*Na~Y4KXJja@D6ElHWLgpd%ZO6(7b{qj^2C}e3^ho z^&-f&TOEY`Ge4%jtzvUSdBERrVo@i*II3~tED!~`4FzzV^vWv#TkG01(yC!OOhvL( zJ7H5_E}SC`z`D0hV(jHry3iKv;%gmZTHppP!5K+xdDI~b-k!3uFr5CG!ka#68 zR89jKzv!HzsF6NI2U(C+Og77*MmVkW-Qu45!#RQane27$@(eDwdc>{u5d}8qEoSi~ zOXfRn@7@Pf41746-S>rKjQk{GQm9+xz4bCtL`U#-6DA4DbF$#K2x)ajFWd~bBILO1 zLPC^`VJtPB-#|0{qW=?`8l-5boY|ZjT}hTzu(9T)qh6vt{~bb-$(buJGwD1fGN=2l zepI1IIv;3KC64E5i=Sil5#+;fo)R$4&Zm-Im%EIR{WYtI>oq6>bYH-p1yPpq#cDy_}<+pdZOz!Z*{_}{oYQlGyG_vYD?$DtFF#T1$xDPQKI-FXx@r(VrR7jewM^X zEY$wN>^$}dwu$JVg%#yi`Z^`cT76IGtMwvQet{2)H7u#C_`jf+sh0j z8?TpN*UYF+yMm?}8fd)ujnv=AGKF3FH)fFi2DMCTG&}wOD(tVrs`|b!V3d&N(A_EB z(p^eOOQ)1{D=FO_(j7{JG$`F5N_V$32-5Mc?;rO*&;3t*Jm>7a_Fi+%ImVb{ z?#_B6CM0LmNrln?Lp*+1W;aJbOSfGJ96h$ZZzj(&AFLb}o+qJ*_!|48PqaLV+~o|v zlN%Y=mobrq^h#Wi*E#wY61>QvR@+%^=P)`1X)Voma=AX}Nkg70U%C9XKD1FC+465u zFgd}*_X{u{I)^C*(9QFn&tR%RriFIu#gXG?FiS9Sp_>XSZD6X8Kz|rAo@LxfMO|eg ze2~Usx6bq@zZW>N1D~PXTDt}Y<_xAskU$D{$V5g1bw9ATPX2ME*X{h6=awf^-1s8w z6WC7YG+12mJ^w3SP1F<~3+%838!`Au8&OMD@K{l$RL6@xJ*kZXFod=dRBhqdfQuJ4 zP0Z<*f0Om}nSo3{hgvkzKJ9vNa1dxM!uD{#z*`}wyp;<0rdIz`OhQGeT3!*m zuUyjRaWA}sAlueFl19Tou)=BA8tEy8_je1SbCXi>GF)t{qU;QRt%@!wu+leuJF2|> z1JQp@A|AqtP!9p1v$$_KmxH?>2hztyc1eJ8{AEuE^%*G1u;Q;*FXi68KJ~W+5H%2B zyje`N0WIB7cY6v>>>N-dEojvPjb80^W-KWW6>-biY=w^RGNTUxChZ0A+Umz{adNDR49DURt(tf5RW8JggOa#|P0ESN@Y1 zPBvRspJ1n!{NWMQ# zrDMoqBpd;-n+JGHv7jjl05;`|td&}0E@O0;<6B3Q)A5bm@M$|44z-|>RxDu)g9Q9b z=Ou=rHpG=?=bpw^?rqCGsK*SmW%GnC0LHCrvvc&5RbGf>jg9Mo=K+djnq(%D2*vQl zyU6c}?3=#D(()1zd*ZsvpZzkRLCcJbm(cJ>F+|^V_-GvC~oo} zU%I5I*W{pN5Oq2Zswuw>Y45nx^|PlP{tjy}Mcsk@cu$d|ZOd??QlCH28`^gSZRi62 zZ{00iqecs{Y|V{eGz`3$P%7>+y|jUTH48u~Q8uH;vMu|B4_mRwNWdcbf|04T&TUdBNkj067a0oxg)t@;&V(*m~oA{9yt_ySFcfVLH^53IabM(6- zbyWvBY-BT~eisdW>6I}W^)btJvCzDQIDkKDAx5~$_G{k$05CT@@gL+n6HXL3j#MSn z(m(bFGYZM(ftR+2zLD%a|5l1(Z*g1ePmPU^Z$Rr!8z+LZDOzZP!Zc7W@aQQex0o53 zB|z&Kd+dr(GtymF-+59OV(=~U1z8wm1Tcd)G=et zDoG#0>3FA_vPYaGxb%XdiJ4MBB&*`3*&uGmQiR-OTE5kHG*5;?an7u5(AqyV$7fl0 zdzTJ+VLP*fG&EGWkhDv%0%y-wpS4`3HT(l)!EGEfm4!A##?`vH$$$oo1arEh(DBnp z>BI$nI`i{S5{^XfB1Sk+Me`touBY>q0Yh){Xyfhsr6WC@BSL(}`i;z!R@jfq|Az%I zsL`LBHUZ~DE_aJYY_s(xW*YO+JefV$b_+WPO))j4?pJ2vK9E*ivrwfA-bG!Emg@uq z|0zelv46NTAStjfI)U9jvU&`qxG&J<2uy-5pr7jn^Q}7oF$VBtH!p*FcGTTGDz%IQ zw3!&sr2ZKgSn(%G#1N{9q#>pI{!H)xZ0JC%E)i(C6{r3Gj3<@s$L;!mA>RK#J;=e= z4^{QTx&H&NK~FF031p6|x_gHG-_Jtf@hyf01n}#}{5Z#OANSv+Pka`=iTd3D57lXc z^O~_U%iS3j8K4s@Ew05$i%|Fu6mUR`_QAz69vDb*wj6FDZq)&I+dG~qH_$lw#Ra?^ zaku=spr149ff%3K+F_+tp5#&JMzK)|ucliUqt$?HOKos>qu{@pt7`t~0Ad7k@hmtf zPz=8Nc#DrgIZFpvvw>F7tSyLC@}U$|772oP*5Sq|YC@gInQ7}&`~?V1GUZzd1dz8Q zXOhAqAWT8C@$wMYV@1x#%XuL2 z7Xh#>^_2@gS+tT@L{{d%kM$A>#G$-z)c z6c7e}0PG0=nl0)LKGg`40x)oB2b}-l5~e}_WQSi1nA3vKq6J(A)|S9iTVA{fNdlY+ zjf6JP<^UJDWH$YjB+zxsYS8Qi)M`MWcMcSX{I)Z8faH8;Bc}y=a{;CB{Ger`9vHbJ zveg5?VWLf(o z-Gj8}W9%-#2Q|K9Co6vpDoVXP13j*wdGZ)=1wbr$Gy;~b{qfcoBOKUbLDhZ2DsSSA z1i+CDE=K-okTy<7Nx*ZhGXS6mFC3PLXz$v7UswFbuGWYDp5vR3ZvgF&odUcAuv0pF z-lqUg0jL!IhLl?lT3qCVnHAksX;2Dp4V%BP^1OIEjs* zA6e$wcDhU!VT3z60LV|x+OA1^<@R%2aPB3xdH?e`NT6IJDWC**I{{u-AQs+mU*IVx zTLgur{SU&kM8OU~1pyDnf>a=A6ayJ_l8S+8cMsG&TacE@nf>gev*?k?tPB2Zfi>`I z=Lg6#=)}^;_5je*Nx$REvkm`Wz_;|53K$LLwLcV!w{o(I&shjaMf!upfHGGuGO3DLrWh1!AgYiNn zq!M9_*VuwpC$YQ$^{WGf#EazV6lOJ=N{JOPrRF_ohkC5tsQcq?Ycgw=1Pq2w+5QxQ z9dq_vmK2aQXl&YGo197p)=M}i=!5aRF25pz*d=0K*i3~-Ale;Q#>Lc-3Z=(23h;e_ zE9nBXT!9PFMN85(rQ3--p`T--`5CyVr9=G@2T%He2mz=Ii8#J; zp#?=+CjimNTVhrdv(ORjX`h2-DlXf-!c`6B4a$<%m;d>_3^F*`MEE-SKgD#!vN%ev zVFB!WvP_c&1KEC^zXNEDV$0c`Xt1*ykMXK6z+i@kO`ulB`Yic!Lt(>UBWNSs74+tp zK@}uyR03>Ba32X0dUOX=`X>84=@){oMgoi-Ld;HRsouz{M)^3+gE7I1-7*5-Q((qr zcjj%$bDRMX!`Aqc2h{AbPfGEEUr<)y!+eoL3+J7h&ralD^9XLn`D2GlWm3R#;2$veAN7w#eWYgl7MkX#3tss>bZ;(XB4*n^V7jsG~QsK zGc~$ZsD&HY&e82wGZn;VI>ELhF<28P0ki64LNVA@HzxMq#J&jr_A4)Xk43EaeM9LT z+~{r8EheQ{miK-ip>ecM&vgQ^2U@)A+BMzGEf_t3qxn4XHOUl5Wly(qea@dXLYVhT z9r}cMO$iq(O@o%^Y=vjrsm7P)W$x7C@t8L_v2hMe0(AN8mh$y`gxwcmM-HZRCKG7z@voKUNixf|GYi{@uX2DK#3`-`&%YEyed z&_j*Q_sr26TYbP8-`58hj#_#l@Qt(yRX_6NeD@*i*@~Mizpnoo;HK~CLoIhBv;?cT zL}9b&=YM-CrpJt+%-kS+J?c96`HCuqMvV2S8YW-XD@BerV;|_wW2bV;iMsq5{jxNrRHkObK-w1n{aFUH_q=qNbn2v_;^GZ zK|I=Z~CDy-t)U^yJP?KXz>dnfyhya8Cu1=B+q{-ke< zE$T$$v<1Gd_0r(e)uV+j!{?X~gF~|m#Qw}<&{^+9lLYwR7(|`s`(xVyk8~pck7oKM`d0_Ba5(ou2la#gAmO zPTW3H-x&+=ZD6N#)m?3fW7m}Axo5G&LI)WD*bVYu>SU5VSvLolDa$?_+O3e3}__yaB_IIk4~)9h>5 zm}9xv;(s}!!EockO=DCpnvv&sl$s9G?3Ba{u5ww^9bH>^;tvR3#04}9C z0w8iG9f2O@Xv`Q>-DanCz^k1F4c!2`2;vjLC<_dD_kmq9U0q-9ya!9%(I16J!1gOC zD*j03|A|E+6%)S;7_pK$;I5HPM~x$=1Y{wyL~P@?@9J^W!#a%c=_UMsfmsz<|5MUY zJaLaR>fSIJw~L5|To0*_?U=`7l{PMqr!5PB2?v#@f!?n_;QfqlCKr`SxD3kt) zSu;|BTk2Yox7JPyaGhW0K)QfQF4Q}g0ZPrpS|F!YepWkv;)bx-@VvNhAdUB>F0hb%`=hUV1MrtiH5hi#e$!^`b&UB6g%h33)dZmtb1EmE#74T%$~*-OzyGg; z=a^nb3M$O8>K$+WaHPjqwD~l;lHNb)oc!?Uc6E3+$8#C&J`j;D(Cf@ckmQeyJ>SC5 z7#YZp(}MH6-FPf{4R=G>M|uf4A=6(53mXMH{&!3lwcIm$&h^BlULsSKjraXOE)H!+ z7k=EGcyTjqFMLZm&N)thQYqAWKdrHwRVJkI@o`shR}hQz^fee5-4Q%82gY*7&YW*^ z_}ygKR!P>1-wde$x*!`UX=k0Q)^^38JnMsuK{20}-|_@02>QWc4 z4!G2Dqin{!m{{&YIq}=^IA7pyErgiLJeV&Xmgh?yzx3t-nB$<>`zPv~`xC#I>A0P) zmfC}gKC$qz)J{VdL_2*GxhI#FqP^b(p`G!=zV=EAHp>twtpo9lJh$=9gGmYq@4E2U zv4m7XCpT)tCO{jA%YV=qPhnjo|1NE$NTqT|-zWJCJ)44spozxOq!KyG*%I|1i=)p# zr$aGoYP3IuZo_0Q=##&~qrE=cw;cMr?=KKX`~XGGIl221c1^H@#8vlsgx~8nI4snN zun;LIU0I_1SRAPDzts2i2ViBOFOf+Ep@>Pc@`cB3Eg7DW8!Lu>tI!(gh<<4i8sFar zxllg6iCa5I&~!6RZq?$Y?j^m)N_kfSt)MIf^v26v$@&HP_@1Ac6w<}=S%nX!lQcQE z$PxIK1+HgkX=$yw|Dl{78Udc!AFUXWt>u&$b2omu%igR%lkV!Kk6Kl*;?q^@?-{`n zoR7hWKbh|kOPW}No7}5+m*Ai_rI+loK|c&rg&BAt0E14Qjy@>HDV`FsA1gKQ#*!dk zRb0_&K4Bsw_;)?lQ0VMb7cc+q4x!?4I!_e2R%_LZV;TV zbcI~|MKZEc7^yL1Q78A0sfr!Gb*!!~)q3%TE5`cuW_UjqjMy$0B7%Kp_z@$2On_y5 zZofrkK;+B3W>v9-yk=$rE1iz374K8ICLjiOOTV>aylqjGT+C{g$i3w>r9Wd#8~xDW zNlwl~k%}dCyZ=I3#9f?s>Z)!j5pl3YW*r17KlO46J8#2csj(Fz-TFiD} z9|WEe(%+uPx91GURn!>I{IGF!43oP|gNN3!-@XZXgdXkXoib9W2U#8;AE(4$U3)#= z-vD7^CqfJ^D20#GviZJ)`HNK;O~@Y$oH92_NJ&Y@mGWNwT0`8xsHmur=vkY^yGzJm zg;`!*?EteT3>w-|sx$WE7g!|Ixo))4uuw~d2CD1Cjp=QNWb`7myzB0zql7R(ZQ zYEa}`{GNQzQoA>q#a`c_+CSILBZ{|I%^8%cXY^^=pbZID{H(sh^__e&fa7+-wmMnD z00M!Gg~`1-kYMx^C10WymNU*mQ(OWovgU-WxCG(y{}cS7k1f$)%{FADUpou#UBw8= zfKul#(4QJEOh_!5*DcQ?NW<%_#3EhKPbyb>*!A1V@ON4#@5Wx9KJ4Wm)qA|4|DMha zY{CYtM8rps4aV1cZGGi_LAsSh;epOi>yuOPy&f_}_~L6gyG4bX1Lj?{+gFV^f>4~G zsZTnS!^qKJ>Li3zljT&Uq{r%hfADyNdk?=_>% zVZGu%tbrBh%lhUbC#9LmlbGqRU%cEh7fMXl?ecwO{{4p!Qly($pBgU^bgJ-}Xx+_` z6t|*w195Iy5&tbbb#Mhd4T_1Ju$9Sgeb+-4Wahd%wMMr5#(SBS+9F!{J-J_&0bxg3 zu*!n&$64HgAK{TjMBU~g18#ZVqq*Xkgp6)fTLt>oYH4}%>D9`_{Hla7zwEs^{P~iq z=ls(*)y)`TTDP6Fq?@EUdn)ZQe_*^tuVjJKdG2`k|6aix+?MIl@KN4o`G?l^ft5-*GM3`u^fs3)3Odkovq9p(KQc@rI)5v855KNM5A4^MBOEq+Jb8`;f z6NSq%4h}Nj03Yd*l>dXY!LNBXkFSqHt5!@7A$_>Lv~Z zGPYr3Q1K8Ubh60Q2jMgoC>XocQxzYQHV#02kc6nJJEnaqzc9KF#*xY;S;RXDxqaz_ z*#&6o9Z;9yP?oo}=ysE%0bNoeB}#%5cOKzB#vKS0QQ25EbH=BY5N8J!B;nnio!h&+ zWUjDz`|N3~`Sf|9_xi-}jO`ePo!|kPyO=P?sVI8MIm+qXT6n)we0Qe_DCT2J*DnCk zAk|L8t7|tjUQt*GFErm8Ts!*TZKMJC@d=tmtz5Ogn~!VvIPBO?(LY7Q811?{>F@(k z*_~?jMj+zEsPAPR5>WjE(I$w9GiWsvH&<&dyejMsCd5C{lFL&U8(MMgP$93#wxHtyZrK8ODJg>4={Y9UTO)Q^6lt@@QyPJzawg*dP9t(%)0 zAY#`eC7B@?%gyh{z^-Nzx^9tK75x@^6t;#E?{L8g6>GZUbqA-*Iv` z$Z|3=0&iVx2fPOb2c(_h@t+O2iTsI4%O*af5PnWdLm20ck&J=FJ5^mMJp1n7VTuzA z=Qx)DGC6GO)wqJY(-=q>h$%vj|4(%%dAhmyy*j3ADx`sq5%Y`5YFCU-p zpQKzFnph_Aik8~Vyk3zz*#oCM@T?Z*=Wha;L!cr7KKXqC-bHB@=~!G;ZvV`T)+>Ht zXk1bl1|qPrwSXrrVzaT+?>@H|)`G!}s;;g)!8JY~fptJ$Om)jn1^{}cVuzKpzPGkU z?@a#WUyZH?fb2JrUeq{)lNtDrv{Y6e0b?FnRH*le(04Z7!j``iiX8brU9XniH(BWF zuc_nLMn=$Un*p2!nx8vrYyW^nMYOn^Di%Y){|My6*>DPX(BV72zK@^>wFSuBjX(aK z25;)3hAPNwf-w9S)i8_d@c((Q{rE~81;L^h0_U@=(yR*RQ=(EXGY2-4jOPz zhs91i;dkmDZ)ZC`xVwu3gNHK@vfCSA2N}R|1*{RY`wbX~6o1D9L3!s-v^sENt+8xf z*jBeaXX^AuR}{$VGlUhrpV4<58nbdm1sCn9Gb_2k_^2W^!y+wxb)jASyc z--0u=XVMwtE9IInJ|?F*XE0;dH`Q*Z@-LItWD}M`9|uiP5cXfPr{aeA0A28W(1vb` zV=%=02)tG7lNqNdtAD^wt%k_hv6#j4h&jJ$&)6lxgg`#4GgXGEJ%)sU^wvy1085IQ z64eA6y5e16wAr$naB*?tGvZU{{9%j?4D9UemO%Q$cTVZ8uBci>MS4otGip~8(8)J? zlekTB^j7t)WvrknMktLU-M)c2QRA;{EU7YN@P%chxkhNv+j#NCSuHv-oFD(sEYk?!hOu9QAd%g2-=sgn> zR?Jum=%ZlAtLE+}DpoHAPetyvWv<)%_mZ9)6(G&>X#-IW7!deLzfn{Q4l|a&Y(dLh}3^e=U(?RPe{~Hz<;D88*%MH=lnV*@Smc+~z_gisZ zr{T}Y%#0%w`~$4}BIZMG&VMZw}1Cb zrbBJ<($v%i&=NzB8|ZlN{Ao&$HCSC2d18vSYM*TutkJQi;rL;&!*WGK=I3=wjJG}` zQ=3;hlj`Eujlxg|zd`Hi>2W}_!i5G_D_$iP6=B3KkSqfsdlWO_yd7V*a%O6L@O3cX zB}EE)Se-@aS6Zh_K0ZF7Msh*|0-T88fr;ew*Zm@%X&_eo92}I>)=vHC$DM9x>ln9a zWN`rlz8U-sG1fN%{Dp-Dy;D~4eQn|@lO|~)j1yt+HP3+Y}KS^*p3`CIC zs}k?j{&x#_0sZ~`dwbU4C@*4NOV)RCb`b_&`-Wdyy63tOS_PVsqz(wAlQ|3Pfi;k$ zvwZgsAM7fepj0-a7KDCr;l7>X|6L&y1{)ijqM~9J`fFrrdW34-R=cxd&8`UNpF&b) zsq5?OPER-B5~cjLCND1BR8-;?)hsH8xC8~~=jP@X7Rtba;*nnag7p^?7PdfG(_!7Q zN_qW!abaQe>|U)ky8&DDfA=d358-|RhRdgpU+U@Vs)6r}d}dVU(XfF~K3$FE;ILv6 z^&D8Ug9!O*Ed+~!GsD8(-X2^SG`pH#T3Q+#i1z2zo+d*~8d{oI_JateCsyIP*#uK9f6v3uh7YpH#4H)~F%L*N9m9!^{+y_%{m*Mg9i+HQt8q z-W$_#V_M_ihlm{Ddej0`eX%fEv4fINO7mAVUhBduzG^o4#oQfqT0$r3Ef3yTFQ$!y zSU9jlyUna2!oCeeNs#cSiUvlqlU0uag+3A;J}1mN#4@65%&2WGd6!4T5%4td)%M*< zptt_4^H{&mr@$ghxi~d7^-R7^lB`R`TS+N~71NetnYp{4#!+Me7F;V*(~G1bFsQf0 z)NHRcUSVQkA<_%%-M`A)^;rKF@j47HEq>q9%8Do#dd?XjZsz2$dBw@TA4H@Z06;)v zCS=T4Gk8uyR98zL}n$ zc6D3cIml4C!u_RS^c+A9B@9PLN55IdQzV5Iz`LEcu0jiLqQA-)mZXA(g+)n836G*T zlLUSWH=(P9FP3DE7GZ#7Ze=C%8Cbet3seWy6ED>;wj7hFuI_F)b0=`L7B9N~@B2Tl;6YvGUAoEMKKCSP-ma>2h8`)$Ex7Emeq_ri{iRuM#wBma4>F~Ez z6G#6q3R5X$6!~Al(H5UCsU#({bqx$Y-4?pvMhAT^rz|@8^M^YtxFW!UYPTLWqb0!N zZ2fNhvqPkw#Iir7hnJTgqSU}^#w*!GumA!$(13@U;2KfOvbg6)0?`=6l$DdPv9VEg zr7~pYDre5g*c|h&mf;au4kr(D+X}bHyx)eOE@%7D7`pyyq1FqCy zfB#LT9CX*e&o!oZsc@nEKQ529HT%Nmgx@2z>Q-tCuu2s9BSd%Whs^bA5Y0BC+{#) zHfgGUT<*B+J##t>f6oyy`Wl7Woc7$g|3rmdPyjMQ8km>5NuO`EKk^R?2A2 zl!R6vx6@yx56$Z-`QsGEZMoWcf<0MRU;w0KJ`!{rNE5$~49~5p6?0E4(2&9W8VPd% zHkV8=1;~U@{0G*gr6L3SCJ%UM+_vL?SrBk5Dz+q7{2@5EnU2fo=xvUi9UPl0-x3UG1N0MQ0$ zr1{Q!9KkO*X(LoSz#itJoKV0bL%99MfvZj=*Dw%KD@X4acNWoVEmuRlzL9cq=Eh%0 z#J9AvX1`!Y={(Tk@&INYuKCHdZ%}TnhfzL`yb~)Fsafsp>+1uForg%Q^q*3;79t$5 zR{q+?Gzle@l`%M%f&W4Pu9`>q@kd80Zy%~Kd*rn{%s$MMShK=nLrt--;c^?&8R3ty!6M0W%68k*ly3;c+k)khq zgM>E$_tYX{Cge3aDe2u9%&S6M6Zu!)f3-3d>|bKKapWwNGt~AsGWP|YtM(<+2IYHe zr1yP3j9l5&vTM?|l?gOwJ}b!UL_UfN+T<5Z4$=vUT5hm*IU!MHfy2bgh{9se&Vzayk10Sq znZNnF8~%U*w*$EZ3g7FupL)H=1Y|j=gRMZKMfLFv)!xAYV;|`Y^fZc>ac=K=$jrT1 zOvt^6g0xYB;lJcze4$^2#J<8cIbEnVtQ4s;)z9hcWjq+i3V4Y21|ge~1tMa}>N$NY zr1k17yX5pvwei7!f+I@BGz`ccby7K>i>N3u#%`Mng^8W>e48NT`^|(|lGws^{x!Sp zymhKQMQUM89dl{}y#@6~5U#mT*Q2ISuC@s_?OwQAzj!yup#33(YfuDXA|gn|u7`~^ ztf=bp@87qZKsr=rvLfas&zOutO$yuWH@SDQv_$5MhMKlhwa*A{spuQPxclEZo@kMz zE)e}x$nEcgTj|qQku$GAjf`T+fTgL+J3xO$ZD0X&?iCYlF*5V``xXA^L0i}T>$R;H zLcFzM?tQdEr%6ND+q$w*q!E?(2I-Wf8I%Y1`wKHupJ&1Y+XN*O-lECjqI6f6dz)Wi zAzIwq`s@m?jtAxD`_ju0xYb^DL~Is}1!L8|4WRV!^`+nz7?ZGqz8R%57x8-1s@wI$ zdag2@bB49tJ2yOtUc~}47ffYx0y~<@=36{Dzi{2@bDCKm4>LUnI4&tE2fc$pYr{Jt zzrJit1DfP=e3SHDOr;F0muV)<&9_A2)uUHl`^~CA7Xz}6bzQ^3Ep`4*Vw0plI z8&gQTiqloVO4es$9C5LZZ~wp_xT&73H47G|b936GNSn znLn+X7e&8uBh1oJ^r|B=ly9u3Y0r0Vj;U4W@LJw)V0!08%07_1Z99MES4Gp;yT3QD zZX-_{^nTknr9isN$oDY8@AH%ROx);`!1bWL;p}(fRAMmCXNL<_@7dRIqmQz3#9~Io z=N0IEXuDs3N#%C`?EyeoPP)Z=FZGy_a{5&@+I?Ib#iVal8V!P#m}6sOoT8$Jj4|c? z5*pBiP!p~tq^U)gXq0VRTz_9P0=XtKng}U7L%)V-pP%jA*W$5JrtS8)hqoVhXcSdh zdAt2i^>G(JOlqJPRi=4`SgnIw-7sr^PM4xsXzC<+YOd$|$;5t>3nODtz75;eBI~j< z{29IrbTsx{{MXTsA3v&g00uDNBKhcNc{m>hDQS{yA^;F7jFqFyx^$C&Aqu0Z-)vNn zD3lsj?yENawF3DvA1SLW^qHebTZM7rO`YAp9*=9k{LmXM`HRv~VsZywlJM~78?Gos zKA*muu8GeCojamJ3za?%GGSV>_?-yn%<$DYgL8#OAB$Yv2h0sw>{i_w*)P{kO_SdW zlV+-HYv%6IZ`r@|99S=nFbnU)x~mndlMgRUSGsSG+`~dYb>?G zo@{u-SIH9x?wdg>rX7j3lu?UN4>MZIhJ<~QTu;w-o)*k-{-O%UUfE$jU2nL9WTlm zKeWh96?*Yq;YT}<*M9c6ua)7ox5emU;e%@Ilk+KdTQOWha+8P`>|tRZFAl;t0OI)v z=vCg&(X!|%wz7Bx@!KyvlVwZV>SM4oI?>~*!lyQGlfy0o*fiaOmrUl!68i0qM+!tL>`H>InTgja_;k6 zzsFb3E1msW>wg-OKLYMq2jgEZ%< zahKgk3cd#)9k!y1awPWOYxz1mLbPOiX+Ipy3OfQ@1^{pldVtyD7E|( zJT(nyp8v}W)y^of6z>DXg5ZD1OoH@+Md4Ko+tI;qLDq4SI@@NruZWoRf{?yUzE^GE zp1yd9?N4_^w!%3z(2`v5C2`o>9+!=Dje3o^UKrs&VA5=6eZG3t%htZ{9`f6K9#iqg zky$JE*YDp}uCA^c8cEC$00K3~$Hro4DsZPqFBM4q@CGmtRxS(0d;Y$cyB~Q=?m6{kdBC6i7t4E43{z%cev80B|c*lTdj5rd*o& z6qBYdP?K?IcUPly3V>Ii@=241=n|Q;VM04W4NT)-6BC`+q{)?*kBUgVMZ9ffyu9Tc>iuywx(=jE* zHcvAjNb$%8S63qErFVI-N9f5kg>@l0!-!+-D> z?!rH=e`CGs+cbUm?p;2MliJU*8efp(PrDf>dg3pKyYZv~RjoP|@S%zvwwIZCmi{ zd9|Iem>%CHl159O9BF$||A0@ySC3V|Tx^6Xr6? zDLXyA1=u<8&KhVK=Ne1!L7DFjQ2G+TKS*LQ*UHpR^m%IKPeB08BgZ!gFzU z#x_=K&B!46Bw1xUVge{=;O-@9!`L%1ffMiY3{=o9UkWVf&>J;Ij`cj16Vf4`iNO( z?i3M)&%-1!6%+n8_TjUVFvYIKo-!2NkNXTB$<9)J3Cc;D@9@4>VX}CEf^_d z5?4J47l~J(_sI1&PCEXJ9Kkp8`7ZRZBDy)uw;&bi!^n?vi)Y1SRj5LXz@w^kHk5;W zo{%o2E&|*M6@owPL_iEp@Ec6Mha9pW6oTlU*8!Rqb&V5EQX>6-&-4b9Zw?dl0}N@2 zgfX(Q%t}_jc!*A@(HGtu(rtK#!W@HrCCdFqat2nbOhP4qY?>dUP9SD?V-r{Vza75G61-~i)- z{0ARHpO`4{K~5&_6JTI5FI?^IA0>;?zrsqQQF5@-^CFwLeo$>}c5Jr!gvxH31?Rm- zC>@)KcfqqX8;PZ^8Gg%qf(NlWCV#0qev3C~avhn>P#{ZfyUilQ+FCJ8d3swQ;&eZ( zEs)fwUEw;LaylVEK;|M|##Z-lAk*Ve7BR~8CJ3d=6?K@vK z%dsjjz$k#r;Aeb=6QMLS;p?SQE4Zrk*T^*{asHp7tMLKuhR&L-Z_ateI>dWRj<-EKp4V_QeZ>cepgOYt>> z^vH@)*_W4pB#yh$*`3q%fWD@r8?KuBe*as%Z}1Ch^Pac3U8K&XV2I_JidsfyFrJL? zRjWPORUPdY1*Vxr=}%i*TSc)J+YmbTqP@8}BIWe7G)_#?6h;k!XEBj6zziuSHrDGM zWS(g}Q&>nSPZrErqf3fe-)VDN4}8GGF6Z>;s^yFuerdzas2AvgUj+8m)hY0@V%!4g z_fMWIXEmrz$ZNWOhQ@8~vr)J^bM8`*wuMNE2hJ4!tJl%uzA$6txAgxmq$4X4>F14=>TBBNll4t&VeowL1nM8aG}6%O{?*=%t#hgx zEp5db0i7R>MVOGSLdom) z1-*R67%k=5=aBSRK5;u;;g5`Z@K@Y?Uw&QBC z_HO5&Oy+0m{d#fUt(}O%O(A-*b!vo-BSSPz~Q}{CJ zm-A}A@e+fBBMS>8uSWB8b-PMHPE`@08L-*&o;0d>nq#TsTIM8_@#Q{0R4@y=mH=e} zL>+49)In#O*ivOl>Z~8P<}yce_BUA@Bsc?eFVch>Z^XvMR%fgr>BFRcwb_ zM35W9bg2H9PB8h;PuikLnXSa_SU*n+;DAGY=8J;ylHMWw0%6{6=6I$q+Amg+?b5b7 zV34_|92c06WTq?`XJsJUkD!uzEm6XTGbWdQ5nVXkAmB@G zn|CN_^Y7#Xx+@$S#hdR~Vv_u3-#cdMhe{lDT)&E1h$vhbzu@Iv*Vr&*Vpz7V)`Rkg z(Fa1)stTW@UUarRuexk3XHC%h;i-*<8UTs~b_R~Ll@J{Jl@O5vQ> zD8$qW! zs*MOND7m!MMS9nVeD6))Kz@aip&83HrwzSFDCQ${yi05LC5UAGUC3j-snyaeVlNH{(xs|B)8r(m{a_cx> za!?nc2KX#bRw=8LCEUO`=O5tSlxWYs-w9J+Ob6t|fi^4!R99kUQnoL7!4D2Ul^|=U6eLy25_% z-qPkoA7$hGvs=!Y_tGtLB;T&7n(;bOqfXwqDpP!!t^8e`Q7j?etaa7F!5n@pMzJ-T}fC5ica8LVMvBd+<5A6Zm zq0nyodYci8lDfr+;m_&-s)sB|zi2r%So)GxSyAy?MFqIq3zh&AV|q1kM8wA+`E&qA zQMF^^v7rMI$a^mo7cj@+LHfB~b3Jd$t`YcGTb55G_I9Ry{o^;YG?tl8ZmJ(2-*FRv zAJB2&UFyir&UQrvcWvd3K%Q9~_y$KzLuxP-E;|~~EDzChFU1RAtv%TB9n5IRLzCJr zCp>%#z~S<&#EM}m{-E~$>I}Zo-y1Cg&H2DNDc^(oV=8F5fA@~z`SUU4y1SLOwzI09 z%iq`Z!FEJsegxw;;qG>A0awCU6lZjlC`l0UryFB8N-p zX^TUFNqmTeNUxU~Ou#^`Yz{HNUDNb;cXxKK$^7D<*&)0t%GsCZ#D4BO?F99}@5|sIhO~bDy0$#wf=0Y1XZ21DdaIAdZU}5= zQYoo*P4xemS>mTk{aS1tTu6_C4&ug{hpnwGb8<#{dH~{#t=huL*G=VfwE=rTK9ijI zBLiAawFAgP5vHpPpje7a_Y9k^s}4$3cr(fV!2xv;AtB+x{yvZ!Z1&bM2IWFYpv|*7 zgyqa3b8s4*9oyU5_8iQPI+8(u8%s(~Zfq{_q^YejW0zSrPdT`Cz0M zh+Fr#ZU`pgAo{8=gZg%}uF0L{AN4=kY}fCAcAwE9^yP5IVDsbubm0>HDYMqxf~I_z zWBt(O1V5MHWN-o`-f~Q*bz)y<_sAlp<^FPuh%8M^6oB9Qlr1s&aej#=IG)i%ZYj?z z4a!IX+LvanW`*NpH@Fs5sa8WM%mcm*Zj;fyWd#8KpOEbySsG)He)+prmwnm(nUAB}hq!f`p_XC=JprNP{2+oC>g@9Qe@2Ui{G!K1l5VGtDFRyYR zd2+(VWVLYh!Bp+R#>UxN&y;Y_dtww8)fS{{cxoLIOspMMtJxTnN;pq0xR;|$v|oPw z`jOD_U{m<9!>`W=HAhKaUYolq2M@0YHY=mk`{PN%|8iHdg#LYtmq9>>eDm+icp2*d zU;JKm2m>b5LoMp&cyWHls+`2e#%8{8f5{YC`XHNvRuw=TbP;{MIny;OnfYr}I41C&bm%~B5V7Q7s zlTQGw>Z{EPnQ)3+1Fe*FlA(O9xN`hp2^6h7b!jg{7(v%c6+8S>LnZ1)^gwlLh+8#a zVq!ugM_Gt|4*s7!-xm2I37uZbROZTKbb1c%lY`Adq+g`ZT^AM?h3E;?OU;yYu{izl zGVB=;cQQ7PkX1S6$Fi4+LI79;}aR)w;c;>XBo|%Gxsj*pn<=ZCvVo z;q^1!Y5nI$6H>o|XJ(d7sabdQTJjGX!6#?s9FHPs#r21p;Wo12p8hHH_M8i5#jB-~ zdN9qJ>Jgo)$F6GZ&18&4-RgskBAwUPA8R>Sgu`VAJNaJQcQt-qnEVwUUt1u_UjYIt<7JbXrChzlQ@BPi`X&kSE z>So>kqFU4Aq}5a(|EGUKaD-ZY6a<)BozY8qKUg zxmS1dDB^ z>xSEXsl+^7nqOZ}zWef{R$HZvV`Ig$B=KR_rm7s4`!i)J?^uq)j+bQo@wzMi zmU$mi<5~zRKYk3R=LX`2ZXK53tee=6klLL}rR~Nf->{IELDI$l+@cwdOcP}n)L^hT zr|?5kH(hG5us4{H^?YOV94C}%*g(w>o8s2W#cArrD-(zhz)K#VaC4SSg<0KKedjgWPU7_GwIAUh$3E7x4S&`>*!!Wv{kRB8 z_qr_CJ3NN{ufGc@#XJtZ&k8SwTs2TOYj%6aZR*3f+a~rAd${(`@MCXu?@iqb>uw2H z6I>dR!;|R?ul1i_MBVpmb~`EDxNp)v zyh%;Hu({Z`DSg)aO~~iyaQb}QyY#@w_^s&4TIpj8!Gz*nbb;xeVw1M>qtuI|--Y!{ zK3f-m>d&=ym%1@h1#G5LFHV=?Y#M(ubYy5v#*=ih#a-Ti5n*snH+IIEKv-3)=h!c; z<~u=fv1o8^`YnvSQXQ^$F^p?aY}{Jt_2-62*Xds8jY7fAO{@yxjc*11Jd@RjR1Z20 z%g7^M=oRML;n-f-$KA=3QL8$NB;)m)A2IMg8&KeurnR2@8mj|8{F!LhD$ol)ZT>Qz zuf?6us63BG>(S>g>gRN_zka$J)){4j>*Ut0zM5(C1M()wGk~EmVG_zmz#OZ6elV?OF?lqyQ`QxU4=5nx4b$n_( zy3F`)PDtS?#_q`d{uIUJE$2R0Yuk`E?AxomZ3VY9zhgl-usXGHbj-kbqKIX%y%WsC zlGSq6HrUEfx@z3Lb7f8$|yyL8>iTihwTO0+fg5sbZc4%R$;RJ+5+s2UW`{jQ$&Kbn)<8^O52av!(>c zBlYLExzLwIpSJR9_QTc>x4Qdc_@;L&U4%2!U9Qmji%Zc?W z6NifFViPpyCD^1}ZHahGYzcFYDf#?6c{;l>GNu(~-4q)~xq8+!axIV*Xzx0re;E0! zE3hmo8-D6EMPcH_u$^C6_r7Y7T_c-H(6%8KBVZ#qVB@oH1(yRVQJ9H%QjheO#tTR8 zb0de_yE)xNe5w1-3;1cywW&ynhy-m+Nv-a2IRUp;EjI}DA8U>0+WJ+k+%GCbIrw38U; z6@R%p5TF;o`%NJ9Wsoze4T=+Gif$HPHdB9*5=J9MbHzPWkN!h@jQX{b@76WjG9K*} zlTMU%zab?}!@g)~Jm+V<7GdywPr!RuK=9qR4qZ-14_L*n1;I+d_% zAs24)&hJNF97gt>5W0NltdL4><$STX(l2K%rm#sLBWF|eIU<6z)M~tZqBriQw($vL zM&S0!H?b~ka&mGleOG2Qm)i+O3pia#EI(fkWIZ_jP_!r%AbGrUFWP?UNBJ!;Gc%T7 zq^sYrC#mf2satwvm3>U!SxU5-6IkkfbA#rA^`T;!i?ZSQwQc8ak5brYve`QVJ>@yZ zBuMNE#p^1#se9bsv}&bt+G2#l?}9CK)$B>w9WYyi9Jvw4h`WVrP5Sqd?>S02^KVqH z2grJj9`#~fpXTS!&NjU-R&!EiD2(zoKT9s2{}4ZW>-oXvFf$_N_V-tXWHMb=jKSSa z_mLQTP!9G_VN6A4Yh(_{Sl_%gJEyI%9FSeZ-jqLk#mji@Iz`LV`dELzBbw+&njT%T zz_hcOSGYVQr!{x1ezve)TTDIQW2M3}f3ns?BkCq-vw;+f`E2Lq$P?MQifOOv{Q)9L zvZb9r0(E@MmZ!2~x?Z=+NNPza+^Uufh}zEYpQTPHQhpG=+6)utd{lFXq1GuNt)Vj0}|bEDt9icAP%Rg=ZsiF z9*4FGu0Dh&`r7US#NLN&9Q3QJt3B@50`F|o?%npb+3CYiQn;<+vh_@>@HT;DPzW+f ztA>iGDP=^ZdM49iI5ClX?n8rVqUu^ra-QddY)Qlyr@a@af#Ro)xMdjj)8@?>Ya#|* z`-DA@%ogz*GIJ4Q+3luX&%1cuVii9ezRUI!!$_u|)rrDrbYzrdZ4v zw$97(=|k?*GlJuQ7JR!7<~Tu{@+%6~r-$3Q$8q{@tIOgSM~ECwc;5;V0U?Xx%x?X~ z!NvK-`SgYRaJ{_oZPLFmIxXt@BuJ+g(%*hxl z_$41KH{cxat!glA4k)a>Qeydees+>vQPhrW)H#aE)5_&||I_1B&AV=UE9F+>WIPK! z1_HIG+E7tqm$Th{zPW(qOnB3|hgkI*H@6t~>E^{*eIPEx>pXUS*u zvWpoe-KKY+w!d-RUE*!_9C_k=`}rXH#V^mymbP1>cIQrKpDWn_CcNG!Et`t`lE(+6UpcaoS$tpPZwFt z6aw(yVwCGi9>shkSb6w?`$yVDZ(;qp+lfxSm*=u*{4e#kJ&pq-LVw@LB74fs(c(Y-DICd)Y-_1F$_PgzivpPEW#XfPUFBkXxL z`SoQcLAq0xNo_Cd?)U6tSX<2~GS#_lo0glNX<4 z#?1U$Z?RI7r*SwRKHrI}_gG4Jc8cfETteb`*v=RUSc9H!{L71j3l^R|I8yOG z{vm!oFK%42^}yA-_K)UTSfce;jM&fse+`P?>toMSrJLsq8w|pk8&yVWyZXlYwKTF7 zk097Y(ky)va#-T|tgl`jj7i_g9i=iaxVfM5aUxmNy*$qpC6H%eHPiTOA6-IkFL8U6`jTeF?Th+71}k>^y_d;P4TAd8(G*>dWa+_cRnTEYD@ zW$ETAl2}1yc8i%d8uv9QIm!=i3HG9drAXa3?%EbelsR1XK7V$SXHf4&_TV(3B4-k> zfo*wiQ{Em*>*b{-#MTbGhK)tEN$or_TSGhu;8NCC{BY(~ynJPVf$Ji1DKX;ipRP}z zbC$egcgi?}z)raTE`V^_DS5Roy%`FNpoAu^u4?a-3h$FR?;}zwA_y(Le<+yfQJo)N zFr(&9J5RZ`EeUL&eO+J?K$KasUZy)Z#BHZ^0*~C02WZc?0^6VXdA`P>zH2#JRDV)k zPswZC0w?-nBo>v$Q^O6V$Tu$bWC1{C9H;I#(Nx#_OXM1!UPJfp4wwrz^ydeiDktBK zvV2Izf*!x(F&{2ancx68&IwDFB*SJMYUi0%p#TVoCmBu=V6pcbrNB4^88oDt*1}ew)z>P2)gd^Ydv}A{pyT0 zFQb8_fgt2|yK1Y;H6G!Nclhe|*hJpJ?`g?H(OxvCT9ZmXd}!Nw>!cyh% zYh-0}HU#zOH4CE3xDs3rbc=<}gcu({*vw8HKh3l{+&xidl|#k(6Ly$h*Vnu75l&kq zRA<>4A22RRZ45=3raeUe&LEpfvR+f@ zzB6X{6F)3WfP_SEM=Q|N{dtAtE#_JOG6PKPKHsqdFb&n7S_(M^uT1Smpu%?4^N~98 zRlu!XkU{VdhhtlX@7n7cm#H0ygw^go#9sYf^GI1|n#muJl+JX&AeBJ>#$}*U1B8vW z@TIslr-{u~?IVyV9}mBe1mH==7+mrqJH{v2zBew?7S@NPB$;M_U?KjNh#)f1<&d!G zr4~N`@DK9EoI%aT1UBZ)GZm&KAZidWTM!?(moUW89zNFr9ElV7z3|#M&sz6`4In>m zJs)fb7G}In;X5jPT6E@&rO6H5Dz^bwS z9~Lb-P21r=dM)+}Vqq^?H@yE(e((2DTU+}da~Op=Ta@qPpM*zx3xDKEu3YnNqJsF5 z0+<*}(XZjpzhRz1Sh46D{KUGC_!MI>Iv%8V3Q=KMB&e?VS&$TFb&%$K1o8~lV>vOE zVlE)Tp81*UyYlPq$l4vIO;ui>Vxse?H18&CYh!!QUL9aykDGq+4y#bugGsPRg9+9DUo7Jyr!(A`skA~ceJvi)i2gRLCg}ao7pkn z4Tcr`u{yY@HuuSPdPP}Bo2R^k3nl;Fm7wTZS%tMG&C*2+ZTpX$uI1LxdU+>L3IFKL z-SIS%4lSJOz1U*QSi4CP{FXa7lo^BdGfRBu>n83}pK%lVWI{~Y57Z$&-7!2EfwkPT z{uGZ93>|E_$A=qJbMd3>K?8HTJ1JI=fBMlawl*-UrP(I+&avo9rCRmpKm4kYcR!%L zhu~cs^W8sqnJ*bN8};L*y4zy5mtAwMjHJG6ZJ>9 zhrxFWBqTf&ug!o!!wik?u87*xKo#0!Hxt}Mc%)ZDri)Td{DF1b}#!2W! z%H0ZQn>*9GW#;ebBsofwy+#%`8PxRL zb|bAybQP{e+V{t8F(?bxxk2n`GC0gzeXm1e?TZ;tu72;lOIhW*iyGx^`Id>{LT-2} zsD0bayvOrA-rk7!t&-3eKGtaparxm4r%sh`k7tmMEIN%Y@}g-sz8Yy%rPEqpjS-?+ ziXgh{yx6LX!}<3NsS)+KQuNpZvxcBQg)|y26nCh_l2ly0^gln1zMGUPEARS+P)6+8 zw?%jM5oNALpZ4wKguq?gUGfSt@o=xhBGRfNS`YI$vIVWfG(mT9}hAN4=jy z$hIK8^tL@fnaWmQe`;(v_t6byUa$8pxJq#b{N&Fp>De!0JPQ4?k{&KJ9}%T#u2TfO zn+=R%cWBCXSf04hY}9dmKs>({RT{P16Dt%!x!=Z@^QMGUs5dm}9_z)M5&@~V*2_c; z%Zth3dZlL3QMW50KcMp5m^pRZcOt&x3pD7h{JW7HC zH;|Qjq~u;$Bq9deu(J zOtrLdkmUW#%5IraAC08xCug=PQ;FFxIO@c{uMA~8@WZJd6)hfs3&4h!drx~O4kIv< zMl|H=aMlCDJOg@v!N|daN157g^JN_AnX-||>^x^DZ*xQ$NJSMOcta#$3f(*rby|D; z=hx8hk-|-QMGxtgwQ9Z0pXY6nwBk2>YdK52-ZY6z|2;Ddw|R;_YJUFsgbb$ZmmyL6 z6~e8M-CRo~&CHunH`eHsf78I^&j60v0kFj0-d?VON{UGEP^*fRZEL1{Z0X7S;aoKo z)>4QvQMV3#OZV5s*VnI8?@zscIya)#NYHQ@eI6KnBjl)XTE81L8#Dzxlz;Oq)EXl| z&K*|YV@!|wAq!K5p+i>SSwO7uLauIw^7(A$%U^?-$?oLp3u2FTu0W;&AwaM^9>)Sw zgsSkIQWe|K{Xm?dPuf4mujgw9*PsMT$%UXkc-PX=1oVJh#NB5CEZ9IGv3OVue4w?QjSvkXdvO1Wjar^mc+6(rCoexBbwmqlzllQ3lPS*)1ZBMaAx~!2kK7RG? znyZ&5t8IVWJp`5gl@xJ%Gx%m~=-iHPU8#IeohsrwkOCvZhT)J%LgtQsSg84DZ}rD4 zZ3;4ubR9`$kUNLt=9H+gFy(cRll6+W^G+3qrLM6$Pj{fSgM|zmkg%Q&I07yO4m(%< zLnlzIj4DE2r-xbwo?l#d&E_0`53m1xQTW9Q7nl0(Evuhplhw|1mSIxCrxs%+rtKpjKID3x9g{fhuZ;=%s+FHQwi0Vi z*fwAHuXr)C0nn>lV~f~k^6Q@{S(=Xa_L&39Zqj>E*EsZG1i7);%!8Ud+y4`E!O|UzWT=Tdv zwtD*;rGeY(hr+t!=YTrBW1=QJ|#QHt&ok%ND8@sg8~x#l($*9hvByn;gW^b3x- zLZJ2?rZSt(`5Vf2j&{Ct%c@m7xQ!;&qT$lC9E^WZASLiv|1v_tt$*_}iv`)Ey~EYS z)9i-fdmvsRPOLxwQy67XbzP^OP(>t4@5(b3yA*q6JOa7V>4T#jA}yr(*4owV#3|Qh zYH?KGW8jXJ68IK@pYQ7Ekf1zR8!P=N3#|Hbcj8Ec$?zv_|50|>G!}!o{j#*4j?LEv z20uP}0f)$af6euDyA5L4@q|Nf)C_FxT@ks)%X6QEJC~r*QRK9)V|EJF@>wgXf#H__ zm5Lz*TP3|CDS-TzRppzFWeDk?7Y1(yxrtmJ>mjez)aG$jEf8e$uip@G#=He*7qP$L zZoo05tmryV&jDrgrb4)V=t#n;19Qn|yI9|ttcD^y^(kig^Pi-( zQO1JgO}yXJ?zbj94DIy)zsi>)`2~-H^ zB0&R89zCu;Lota5^IUzvpLZv+{z2dNML|n(->8BUTyEY!2MSbyR^im=im6}f9@paC zz1-Zs5=sW`yuvUfD!h1LD1T*?r;Qt}BY%3mx|HIMC7%6k86JUPjFWO~c9l8`HDzTD zT7|6$yDrGg4WymB&XT{h5SxBEIfGO0+u8T!5aJuzDyem_IE#^_V&kZ7=x={{$7G8O@LR0`SU|iq1QUeFL7MGh4npV1h_$`kN!aS zr(2`%>&xH6;blW_>VD*?h}+Hi!-VDUy}%WITxK4n5G7Zodn$ktH^=fAmQW_q5C%++ zSB&xQd$;IdhBOwIiWlK00tv+Hoz&&a4uctsKb%b+cbY-(H;lwC_x0fAo>@+EE%4e zt~L4!8z+Pqz*rpR#T&@26y58SP1U^*i!#xEAW<;kaz&~D9Q&x`f6rP!d zKaQdOm;%}E@+buf9wr(J*&rv^6Fypa_b_+PtouE)oIg6`3tRY0b$S5-f$ei|kZFDK zcbqrQEE;eHc0Pjs?+ow4wQKp+O~Q;o|Q zsktx^N)-{56#JzYrovXy{@(~(VVN?T@Gt{4yoweVI^HHd0u0~Y04$LffM5Aojsit+ zSEP|aK6C`ScuQ*Vv+fAuBM32@W@{!U;NZ5L$Gm;}M}vP#H(uvorhy#X(>A= zhc)O;axyiU(eHxVaEjZCSjkUzsW8uYV#zUyEim>9o>bqlo^V+kEpBgsv_dOn-x5o_ zvJMPLRY?E`h*9mA%MSBm3nbbmpMg-lIaOPYJ~eND9rFS#8~;!$y_8T^P%n~zt6>v@&RKkeei@4XY<)rtJGHLkv_}(O&Pv)j7 zr;62r3Z%+5n5{(VXm4g_HdA7hVRx5rCnJ=LVFzl2n^fF4+JdHl9nVOuu$i{jrn453 z86)V?X8O%4eOJ&ds${`ssf%1$VC2?wa*6S;FJCl0V7l>})mf{)c1y6*P9sg%+#E7x+;QOwOLwt8$>7(CaWikbC$W~Ma zPk(WXR1g9G9sI%UfJ_dUy&qG7&KC}S&6;WiSCw>AIYs0FdS28gp%6|g>F4Kf#coUW@JUN3)0oCzvVUV1qGDAn6S zrzwKJ0}8?--wjSV!#;b;ePLXCEe}#R!s<}(U2h>hKU!>J-qTlQsaoaoLg}eY^2Ut^ z!aT@bt5M$*g(hjLzYzC(ReFa#=VW7R@9ysY{(U$9`9PfG)-}fT?Zphs`{^qcWO#v8 zLQ(Nq_w>u15IcnEHQ$MLS}mlF%Ucz+qgaf}^Pc2-Se>-dv2T07oIyS{YyA_=wN?Me zm{GHJ@4pzZ2h;lH59{|oEYz_X{t*Np z&^G*mc9MA=MkQpwJ=Y2`!b>iW>xr#USE{%;-_Iw`lf=TU+;D(tS_v9_9HsQ_o%e0( z%FRY28|)rMG7&B~Ce@zjD+wjzExQIY8q_$#A_~(beNrp06CaD~GdJ6@+9(ET8_X@O zn1-FHZ{IpBwBzg5)rGayb`@_9M+_`nPLCN&W1UmCJPg~2fkuOAz^^H+ku4;I1ujhA zui@WH+|Us20&au4NYd4ytfvfwR<1h>4`QCpaP@5$d6qtRUsztwECAO3H*2VH9D1(7 zK*eFU7vj48(xlsMD6$){+rT^3vJGOJYAa}(Am*t06Nc9_FPKy6Y13WJ9`)C_w)3;x ziZU3_w|#J>D}ldd&@vyf`0^oce||wQW#cG%)|*nyYmy1)UoM3JuOUd$jO~mw?=Xa9 z^0%+5l)#*ilGyDQ)}GO1Vdo6~s86{scCRtY>H-3ajSYBwyPhj!M43Km9^qEvvrsN3 z{!aC#2QnY}vZFk4JY$GkZ;Ghg#3L2=S^C7NuonK!VKB`gdEft)>#zRHUa&H`GyXkiq1bl+vU^A7fh;Cub2_T|^Xu;a zk!x@rsesE&_xFUxUO^J0i6T%>u-lH(*-GTlY!ejV1U#O*{x7A=iM%)6#K8Z{@Cx%=03Q_d@`vrFN zKtIt2xBs)qn5`jjMSDZkXZZMnbISdb*fRVu`!iu&RHB0i;+VXc!Hs%hKh z*xkoITPp0gyd)$V!3YxiRx-K+lU_b?ONiC>Y0%q$#l-{pArudQhhPQ~0R`!X=BH6e zObA_m1^~$*SZg2;itl#ugX6~>_MeH$1ia>tLFjdHGTjTf2n==yfO6b7YY`_#fx9*) z%d9uW6Dj~WhmjPwIYdR14?%Oiux7nuF^~mV98mO}%Unw^pbN^oj%;lp-&sQ`5hU(? zehME!fbe*Rg@sXCSNb~EU7Vjpil2}6)_Px@kLWol0pW+mU4y6nQT%*6^3lhK9i5#S z>W~&c0sIF8pwg4W)!klk0|as6(BOl7N;Jwc2pYDu^W;lX&LZ2{CTd})2_R8?T^AP? z!f3@)3_uWd1~&&#ED2xBtS8^UYLAcchT;3V(px|4iZ6x$1{pp5eju2)>Ojp%_1NhE zrin3g(*8RqU=w$QHPFG~?B4gdJ6Zl7i&Aw1dV5-iC7>Z6x9lSQ$D~Q;x%rfqmV&F2 z#?`P5!k8#94KE`b2!9XdJO3KY1IU(v{bQhqYeN_i*4go&eqX5P>-T@YsCHc40lvUK z>`u8xpBbRVu`-Jv@FhoU_dBN?0O0y~h4@wj%06)vf|y}U$8UbiqIA5-?Hx>V*2?YW zOC{|PK_x_xx0V`;W7(JHOP%R;bh=jB+c#wLEe!lhj8|761;bP@WHE6l?{pahF8$Gp zwqEOX=EfI}8QB?1azCyofgf%0!I=45uy4#bd#)&Vd$R@@sen)iu#Wvb?3aJPu%h)S?(!Edw23<=985r_3%G;L^mD)ra z#I3zvZsa4xAczd=F)3(d^dY-=jjy>$je;?sl$u?itt1DsCZtjn2ql4O4}O5CqYi4C zEBaF0c5gx}sf1*Z8B&h^lziv9Ppfa=!7Rvsrg2DYumaxHVwdf?uC6XQ@NR<)gOVzhYCSLqQ53w%AOBl zrYozf&8oRJ0uFBrr>vNmM;Hs{DjeE{>umy4p3DjcL_|!4Lm}C%dW}%}kx=35}pFQY3?pBOD8`=ZVf; zzv_OxXQ5XK1v|sUFm9XQK)yx}jwF_A@ZIj--ZrBbXd6kaB*hf@^cB{VA#tN4U*QZ$ z-Gu?PIuprC%N#^Uh2q+&)=895MbBhp9R5p3>+SCRr8_%2{Cqm#XbTT?_yQ6@j|1m>b;+4@cQxnl z?>G@r<4PR6zPz$5My5Ny*~){O2#k{Zk@(~`Odq?F-uhr6^0}ZwBJfph6ZPH~;8+XE zkTGQZE_6ep)6rx~$kr2Va29XNB3~=b+ zpJFiJLVY!mW5wg#2afKq!R*-HI1C@22H-IVz%F~J7`>;%_AftfGgfq&d*x~>X${O6 zwAus@KdJW;)i)qwNAutO`2}m5rKk558ZN_&el-kKTfi@gcdYsv(9Ogqt6F>E_(@{! zkgu9b=gg`joY26993O0M24;@A?XMjH^|HVEqs^apW5q?G5bG)~XYiXZyD4b;MTQap z!z_(#HONf4zA;__*e~V6$NDC#N(vKq%`lrTP6UnU zuZx((ME4o0cUMgx*LeudKK0-IG2MRL5=`jT)lM|m4+)A5nJSjFD@C+gt59F*{jJ8x zT9<8O`4x4e<(_0Py3mtmQ^rftCAVzbwVzz&i85e7q}`A$T!D4f|DAVjNX@D0_rq?W z$*C?^1tc#=OA9kk)s4E+7(QjX0)RvJ-guS3q~i~Wb|$|AWy2|mUy@i)1z?dDXqSG| zziK&?zCQ2)>q-fnC0|#o$*)7+xLY?0Ym7IM%L^g??_`d-`+&Vld4bfxBdTcvD7^C< zwiPa;c76v)C#vz6&_!wy!OX|h58=z+_@e`SkwMYZm61Z)@C!H+Bt%3!*Nrxflp92F zh070+;^g3n5HM2V>>&l7o~;DnEk=C$^huI-4=|n@6;I3>y*AFF!AAN-gHn;by*w1EYJgh1~+CNGtBtWwph%Hxo zDu*A#|0*GNRb^4AiPSKn{(efv<4cBQ@#?=)Geo+*0}Ft`BFg`~F#7j}S4CL=%1kxK zOR{E1l5Hv5D)2w$>C)a4^X$@M04$u$C1caOLjM2cXG(&TzBs2sRj6kDZww3;e?L!= zjcT~`reus(NlD57l%Qnt>3z6p9#nT@5~KPV?&v5hD?_IQLDqeLa90XKZI|~ZF)=YE zC52AX$;rvkzgu`8Dk`>xCX4h^jkx^|?|*Vu6l!{q3jF#aA?M%HQqIq|B?n6Oo#202 z=fPziALES}3>1xWm(_R1>E*m2{}TLNDB6GP5`FJ-f*1c0OsJQ9R29Qkc>RB*)g=~C zJO6K%V(F$WRaNA`c*%V4=&*po$ImgSFHPcA zL#pPd$Go1$d+l$arrm=U2iw>%5KN%>V})2^1#LwEbdtbz9YP~OiwtNd2SBySf|!wh zA5Cis`bNCTq1yxU+}p7FrybF7ZpBWwnn9s-A|-<(o6KwS4HN`??j{H=Yc(#dSI0A-mAa@*$98m{;KvNn41_{wzqwX_48O10I z-4@h`zhl@nh6@dPB>?NM|LpDVR#H(>d1H9FRg}j06K`3>kl3Hj-?2_T%{lmsL0Xns zF)JU6G=Pl~M5{$;51MlO&H3~Z&}zVtEppI8*VI^z>+U11C$WkPnxA#fHk|7n7X9mJ z3heP7je!V8AjcET&r@=RxmS1E)WT3qcNxv0CrNp_jx4L=?yit^FaN$AC6l{=ASR>VC%+5DQjy zDMAW%-=C;*VEr0EwAC_~Oex}0bhJ`;whx+5T*heB21u9+3c@FHPz3*GlhM>9i8h2? z@a|?+SF$jv$@?0v>a`NM$8Gsd;Bd0TwDS>15UIDClAWhIMpW7M0D8=JS0B!WLa&UZ z2Hqj`SM&=~O?d2fALiW*VA{>dwgKB-W~5k19Bx~G5I&>W`Jsv4M%I0FGXZLe+O0?G zg)UYr4gfpAcZXIi@6_jM0_ez+|4`%~OT;c7ZkB>^{8}3X%%?O2}5}KO! z4xfsk!D;|hxB$2`I9`mpsGfs3p$;r251lY2B@^+`>pjv*9Uy@L%2hX|QBQeac>Zdo z%QDpTdL1aV4IYiRsi`UksG7si)xJD0TcO(l<`;~82*r{}$7j^7HI)2uVZ)uh!a@K; zyg$kLxxBp9WGAAD(!jI}?%XGkj`fo4$Xq;m?^KpyfYi0!CL?0J3owb4oyWZD7DBZH z!O7rsj)7ez!eRL8GUzvb`2@f4S;Q=4&+I zJmu+AOEhaN)Goc&e4L$V-89hZ_^s?^iX>2vtzk4m_6txFM#c5;Kknzu5(3T51L^f`3|QndxfbFZns4N4IP?}9k=1FVmQJQ|s03BPCyXgmYiYzp z=Nt4&GL69t^TCqz4Lb(TR}{sv0{zmX6N6YE!Z9Vw`g}AI+v2_kUH>XwL_c5=mR?qs_;!uB_zn~PFG;^#mch^)*q9G$Rprge?CJfNz65l?3sBNW)x1N) zBuypXiljirU!?EblCNb*`SZ`qvp*yJu8k{S+^%Z+-Y|wM?v02ZOx&ldwVd^x=h-^W z@MOEwk)cIS8TQNN5qejs)aj0`mAz$@(7jLU*sr^x5;4NR(q=TXg;Uc2>XyuhO2x{g zK$o@PTy`N=))N6=32rVr7XXdr&F#;;Y< zl291)ms<(yJ#xndde?-=9e>uBw|fLN%FZ<%&-P;OYSX8KX5J0%uPY2|${w+!Y4J-d zqQ>uEh9ZYFD&10^m2wb~adYR%>;I7DvmWsz^z^>cY(70p3YEk8V?{4X%(;fDrS~u1 z*pdVVDAAcVQ-Md;+q$mp-lqksnLioB9y)?KbmkqokPzx76%+9SV;D8$#JDL4BMD!! z^4VV*r;a55BRR)V50r`W1BOM7hm<;We#qKE&&V*I;c(GWxFP+ZRmqGcvBJ})W-Pjn zzwi*b``*(5CiW|z>)D7mJYV}x8~DCieXAn&VBVJNEcDjSINqc*7NPkEW4?e8#-yzg zHA5}3O5R`@Uh})pskwCwO;OVIE34Uwqq_gR_i_0X!d#@k{j;xtJA=18YWU77;p3}> z#e00rMm>JUx-M&iVa}dHHkLdEf+J?SH}Qs!r-T&izJ0$zgRRA(5ZgbCO)m}&WMnoj zZTd5Nw`1o98Ym~a8GlKJ`q4Ljk^n4pR3;SFP(yYn*U_F{VyS&i4^t6&C1!8W(M#SV z^oB&)KZ#CEtrsbd{&Da5-FrBP@99eFKjM8c5ld~iwcJ4PIFE;z{K8-O?pr7n9+eel z(=%$^VGiaDt+HXKy8<{z`((&c+e6Cb<96d*h15?Y^>O)j5T#~+AwmhX`1(lb`7axu zxv6nXFOtdaxF#TFXUDJYf65&C-W!Utizf4~(dIsu)K|exeAO+J|UJ8(DV>K+#7-9sp!vxP2l3Aw&OCTiZ8{2p;A^6%Hx_tNM`$)O#4l@GgKji$8&%zG=M;ZpH z4DvUaqNhBbc3Yxrbcp0?>RF<*?Z~+LGe@X;jcE74_-Uf$Hy02^!bPdK4VMXMy%F7N z)Wqr4vR+>2O#xUrDyirB24|hF0~;WdH||eX+Ra14j?nFzo~>$mAjZuRnpgmRfK)T_ ze7+L3pR|)k_mS+SSC5-m^ts7=t>ipDd8^N8J$>%vbjM3h z;VBSjQGCKQ2n=_04sCNXl3nqJ<$Tp1MrE(|mL2fOFfJGkyhyE~swxCcBdSx+R)s zC(j@2@2}!kjoLk4+1lscnj?%SP4&uSsD3^E(C57bC#EWJMA`>Tk zybsr8nFV1gr=NcP!mFJLNDP3-RUI+($^EK23ZcDMR{ExP397WwiO$Q73G&IqMyR7%I1e%5w*(K za&J0WT#7kZUX};$PDM5~f-gb6(~m-&?>{ael;CHbYSGKznuHC5Sj19-7y~oGy5p{1 zBB&fG_n8td40&>X@Buc>!5qeN`6{;sd=nL6JMTKl=<5YCoWT0Ceci7Ffy)rtL zd)^hIX%4I3)17NFo$|Fk4jsN9QJ`0~1BBfEjQN!iZAdzDuLuKmpee?o$sZ$zNuRh9 zoBTQczb7O9=6kMM=9Nr(YF4H9PunWn4{J8Q{+1Its$ruKxjOmcMYa8N!yoR93sK1{WEuxu6hLY-vF>%>Zo*6VP#;ZD|Q zb0F>o^w2H!BrDKa-xL0R{5vlvMe@pZDnXt`NgtrwPN5ga6T(OyKJx>f;Cneg23<%= zx%DTYebX^d0iA0DNcbQbAdIzuL;HN49XrKoy#20(>1ReDV#LANSTW^>MePnQqS1{O zN7~O?D_ngLiVP|3J<|yc+}CesKLN|7$&GxJ{05bv-sKec9@k&iqeVts=YrTZb!uNJ-qO?L?j#Ick@=7eF*bJ&{?F}iN(JF{AInduYsCeJ>{`Ac1V3;!WGTh=#* zp?I<&{=YY|jQsHPojcB!iXL`{!#ujejw`AwGIbU-#lF5an>UBF+}>I0qo>b(e|0(3 z`Q((-`{fTlN*(-=eg8K777dkB-Iq|r*c8Ra7EHcAENF?@!NiUfFgN+G%FrzQ;L2`D zoI7vgjYkMBmg+Axac6lFB?%iO#pVF@u03#D`v1T{PUtFcU?9oHE!zC9z8)&y13|C| zC3DcEl`^n(3u)78pi-@!c;-Y2E8ss`z;AaQS^2dNO@Ry3=oKxd`yfgrYmj0)T#n4}p3s)uo{oEp}un1`V3PS2bNCO_1{0XN2KO$rMl5ya` z`^Q7HTynR$_x>>zz=8bVpN8@ubp%q}L%9qA`%4=R`~VmEaPNPci2nb-|9@v^O1BkU zLl7_`_+U4A37;t+zE#C3)k~o`yOlmM5k|skoC*5VEods2xGQB2nhdZ+QJ7U#RnUuy z!SM9iGc=jeG83D(-@+xil1S|LH`lsFnEsCp*y;P10)g>@5c_}mUSbF|rMs{Qu=ELn zc5_l7vgrleL&^qJ{s)|hAdhcI8UyqljPt9)N|~!Lf~RT#MGF|?&AWG+KV5@&qHt(wI5Z-UL9qa`{wrk7+%$52 zv(Z8ov7@I^;r9nlfl}n-<72o=eC;47)$1#O{a=D05yY>E|vr?LovuM;12i@#Uo zmHa{)JTU{x>X#o>3@N|yfrT85SyxFcfMQjMAriF$EDkp^wRpxg5>FJDs4!aEoFc!Y~7dE$QUWo)Cg>F^izGXN`^7SQTg8I z;!%ycCU|r|{S7sf)1d?5C{#jFEj|Ic6<6%g5YU{WR}~fn>vOvf0-Qh-jo82NO0XAv z-w6E`opU0qAa~{`7>aCSwgl}L+M&MnL=Iy#2ZNT2vE4C#DFkh@pxdHdL*!ST_`NK= zeoa*IlkgAo<1lnSu&@iI&jOjs5{K*bB~wo$JijF@H24*4(mB*jxyook-ZhCC5LtV) zbFJq*{tRiwY`xR94%W&Wy^yyLR$hwq84x+)<^HAI*|SSN z(6iLVtxPEi!ZNTPY^-)$2xrz*lLZ<_baJwi_yD?p-{393v%9c6`7*qLMw|1?lD5=8 z>;OZHlC<2>(Q+#5Qz%$Db;{)W3=qp~+Y!x-Maot4yP*2LfX#+_;13I#Ybu~lk##}W z#Iv3i@cJ?*k)$QjdY|$t+tl|njKKpPOnfxJk=jnw1uPBwwfPGmi<(ZXnvr_>YfVg9 zlwMyCzo(CahEsMG{}$a#1K3DFgLN%7{~;*M9ZWvI3u$G+814OgqjES{$~C~Eoqan3 z8)-*qeoD=jdm>H}|1+Edoom?q#{U?bxkc&cOF4`D5>Y#t19y*U!G`)wAK=3Hvhs|98X97WgXuWvTEX%knrkmZ}sJ2?GBRX}X-xf*`M2A??> zad=jO=*?BA0_V1yWxRiXt^itOAMUdUJoh1f6Ln*(^x4irN97XF?@1x)z%SuuxuBuc zJXMP(I~(0LXSz88;ZmqKrma5k7nzVfQ-<-zL=_3SMd0VKmk2!+OTr?IQUHhl{o%aG zn@=%l82&8IDgMnpcUt2;kmBbg+i=Uf;QFgM^qRd7>Sm53-pu;_o)Am5+Yr80YNxzVv>OqAXi zWJ6q`-d_W<4+ghhpAhHupF^%Dk@u1=xabGt zEUx}+Qw{{mcOV*-!RNuWnaY)M9$S~Td{X9O(_TfL*s;=;e`z(w+c?{Ey zCwGVm315*l2LE_%D|QsZ_ki7WuNN4KU~Bp>aJv~OdDN3DKH^<);82ylTUD8hccre< zA*4FW0%B3&X%3P_x>e0;w5+SHpwC$Mu}!zQ`p`W3=Yrug{_`X>33f6i^e1ih5NT1g66CEFie8uf67eQcRhXUYR(&Zm@p0&D!rPGrl$?=R+_kmUKBBu* zfJkn3pEj#H1!595dM}NUHV$>NqOvokOZ@B>W;CGDyVvXOnRG^;_OQNrcFg3cga&_S zyx3;*(U``%^|h6@*|R3KX+y6*+dD=h)JhiPj=^O&-B5>( zkP9ms2QmYz9|=})5Lsm&DzuDW7waZd+xi)A$bV62MmJgUGV!m0ve*3PqI^%$+0RZQ z#}CgRK!8jpKeprLl8CQZ8=!#5$lTU&h!QPAbEWQ)ikD6ekJ9S=c<14dxxBlJvVM_H zO5O%9{)wBA{Mq@wJarF}53cJ@yOZFW+cDanAN5{4!Tf0$4EIwk_;ob^^c8{6=g?@U~pGbd87M6kCi+Zd^+Gr1!9 z0?Byr3cs8xbOblP(?*$iK4i&oMb9y8`%xZ#l8;J-_D^)Z?qDK3YHSs$zPD`m%~M_m z;<&XL;#qI6!ns)I=J#V{uajBs+S&filhmZBr}W+H$>Dgpvq^ceJs=LsB=&oMUa6VR zqY!YhWp_=p$@FvHWfOysl-NeiFI5k3ug8QIg?kBpyH$f&lA#<*bxl+)C)~#xcY)1_ z=-O!&%`+g{Iw+!AR{+OX5ilQ{5i$rYSq#C%1CJ5O=z~KzCM{MGd}H+`)HF}Ti z;(=rvswswO_hf7V&n3UO0lcrA_l7+klBe2US48DHG2J#3yg$FD@&>Vo=|u^61<5I| z2^VxwNLhAaXNW+*_{MqE-beZ;5GkVK7~5E!ANr~o?}^q#8}Vb*Td*W`zLPlMy1kEI zMZA*p|Es6dfL4L<313ycAfMz<6D>b~a5}l?u*l`vAGKG!-Q+rTg=02u|B@+)tnAV6 zdf3)m#xCaGZSnJQapBv3a=f?pn_pIlCN{0f^{d=Ko8SgRvYu#zAShR|8&Ia{>1LJ! zasJ7Ya>azsSh_lM_&06BG9EFJ2!2@q=qNis;gHXI)2%UbliILcA70kq5~i90m zL;jiAc@(=^67L#+Hi_V<0+)LJhXN>@ItCvd{j`ufa~sgY8!JvN(0PI8^L?&42W@Nw zxP&*_Um|VsMra=N{q8Gkk3mln0>Jd!%p3kI%BZ+sFt~A3ogY1t`bA*t*5LYN&)Mun zn;3p^>gFwxzx|iQD1aApUd2cf+4&ti?H4RY_rWNnxAgIjYuysiekTj(z6v0%TE0Yh zRqhmmBmzK+wnOp-q5223=rZB1<$~PIxEwaf1lhwW0N3IV5tvesYMo}rnS*%iNIivZ zT5$Wy8qN=lQ9odlLq$kXqD(USsTk;UCZY%=cz)uWro?*0V?NLrv9Sd$6M^^Q{B z9Xt12XChkDjy#1Z4J}Sgx_Z!d_-vG9G)Rs$in#+G7o4i!9IaYDCc6ls2|V6R`d{8F zL-(j*&K@>$rNQk;*TqG3EG4dia+sBrh>5&?-)rvvz_`);y?2*b$%Nf(tOOOtt#H5k ztmXALoivEx>h}0h2;UC9O3UeH;>Agjz@fic=}rEcWQ?a)Dauf+3KdT#It7G<82>!e zXWiV`Z)>vWMjPC!lke~J%WbvoVn0?es(mClVL>Li(>F4L;1a!aJ&1!Q_u_}sM8w}^ z)eywV>XXt$U`!k022KeHEA+3Qjm0oImYSlooI)Z(2j$P+lKoQv~n;I6VUc` zNa4l`?q@47yd8g>8hNXgFHONacvACkXPn9j7!YVtG~G@8c?L)iGRoEdZnTjg_xq8` zKWSFPRQM;q;ZHAQfcy8IAdTq)wsAfG|1`F^*T;Ux>mQ;(=q1lj0$YHzqJDX|!CHqE z4#=&C;r-?1We`TOi8Wb!kU(Sor@Q6D*+nVi2}0Z=@IR)0!hUtae<#6mW4r`5_LGRf zqX^PjX%~Ppp~J3Tfc%<*=tf6KJ;Y}0@?kvo+ROI>A%+-~Sm0uvHc`wq0}CLM_y=;U zcX;`GZeOu4+0Un9y1|yU#cB?!B9N5L9egtT3YNhZL@k-dNF?)9UO@r%5+V-;ED?!( z!uw?M$HB7_51RG>h|$s7hNb!&VhO)}u6w~PdVcox;)_q^w$uBfZb03Rwdk%segJk+ z@CQN{{Taf!d|TVRC7|8a$KBG%M$+6s^922Sa4Vt|09JbiX_HgGM&ac^y5&89-l4xJ z5OEm4dU4e2+Ip5=?Fo5hr$AaER5vgTi`JwTF4#E*+b*DA(2NH)!bqmzQWSeW_UQv~ zt)AZNMY{F*Z_Y9O|06%By8YU=g5^nDc@=EW*RjC$_6Qmru-`VwV<49r`f0mfsGP3@ z;KUpl_ttgm%e!9?IOPrgMa?C#U3At()Qatern<3_JIAwC7D^YNAlC^VJW#c_!qNd7 z;sX#Y72Ws>?*~a91RFD>Qut2*;~Try9)1NgO>J%526%QoB0xEI2FG%Pu|0Egv_=^` z$=3{?Kv#I{`H_u$ipRic;JL@|x8Rt7V?EIk-+$zmIH+kWqz2lE5hgE_r`jIcc)N8_ znCP4H@#4BJ07tO6+c!Aq2)$!BH)R(+i0-03F^Zc~rx?`2dWs}3O5wv86@gfR?<0GuL5Q{8aCVpj#Fv!!wYAW1`?&!(vVeJf zx;F{|t;EJ>zkmITb6$G)qeW9kM_k-U1A6@oAdOIQcB6P+LMo_c5@=8bNIbw)+enI* zLBEN6DC|MMnM2Zz zMO|hyW2|Ah6Upuq<4z|erlfTGf9xvjE&%ugw7HG=iP=aRCV$|u<|7h^INz+SR!}zx z`*apF|FYi`rqTfOF+lD0prV_YgWF+i8tV7}`k}k71pz0VH=m#CDQxQ}1LTq{8pu1g z4B`sqbfC<`ErH-~mES2E`hK#u%Ww|TmcZXLU(++f)c;&negUt*tV=G$t7n4IW7Uxa z8B8G7@ir*J5Wu2X)lEg|QR^lMxD39 zdF^B!eD{r~K#5j)N*`jIg-fv5{ABq^QlJF8Hzr7b#V}TBAaN=~0Q4(}6ru`@^vA&s ze8ii;fpn15i8&b=8)qMDR#AgOm)~g+K?&U6Ek<*@mE_9!?81W$?r?#75!hz_2NbV@ z%~(uPtA6$2Jr-S7c)s}HVHlO^leDVK4wRPJH{%0fZ(4<21JY6^ zpONLCdf#%(C$k6ZJ_rM9@!97*C$zooOK;?zKuGO{U*M40sd;L;j>q#5D=3EgvYxZi zL}xmwa(gJrQepuI=?w{0360>7r5m|xVo!(cbG;{2J);Szu`H~W-hb-DjepNjJoF%1 zI#r)UEf_wC!5&2~C5pOY&KUMxvwd23>dUo~DK;z}hCL{T1uNa6jyvCt>o23(xjVRh zck5qzu!gH$^+?=p$m4^D!-UPggbA6eP>8J{1?9oIVYANtyVy> zfmd+pEBA|{0H7aKSNVHmX_VeKR-Iw{sgO=EA^K{Sv63!C8oyyE75-UBsXwu%?=Cwc z@ka;wmXdf^IhYwV=qCRfepv}05n)=!pa|+$i(7sgV_k*)UTN99)4bGbt_d<=8_19p zE?{g(ag-VIQM%A;xVX&Z-m8q<>54$}NsP?Df(cc5C1`@HyBl`q&p zBCJNGiTf_T(x@kM(7M@eK@snInZ?H9>+U>xR5ULEQ4Yo)Sw(C!OxkfY2LgO|9`n;t z@_eZtSM=-tkP8v4uKrECKrXLF&nuT>J#Z~6Z2gwmqi#i01G4rYx9*_Y*J_ED%$hDO z$F>+zKX{94Bv>3S1r#OmCf+Q^be4dIz{%?-TktJ;{3kw%#2g+NIsF2(y{`J7bC)oj zBd-ib?W6r8{%8w!iJj-fMku6(89O+#plrbwUKR}g8h9ZqMZixkgmXC)heQ>#8>!^L z)ZFKZqZlb?X>b&mzMABnaTTF9v7gkc$5{n_y&F!4`845FOj&xYs#dIyf%t*^{4IJq zVznH0H%5K_xB20g3=8}Roher%Vl6%sSIg7bE74}j*NVhB*tz@b&11x{=~8+!ML$m8 zM}H3wQ z);ne;4FwhRb4)?zhTkxSW|QEkpdqnIko?o~q&m&;w%_3i59p$Y*hY#@1}P#)r!l4I z`&71h&ZPn>=-6-?@Qz3tyw|Pxgm0eK((YuzRt=vVhRhLnw>pk7_gnN^$hxwf120aAoq%z!_MU^K+SaGi#OGVP?q8i_42>lJwQEnSB5Y&u`KS!&EG0_(l?2NL$dWiDWJrpr#r(QE+863Umj~TA z$q2jIQgcjW2LG&Fnb>N|FjIfB z!{>RXeS?T@G4-$nwE)%GrLiLU96iM?t2Iu+na!}by7*es8r|&4J%0AV=9N!zBh^Lq zJTtSgDMV002xjssYn4JM!j@J1wtVBW9t)@hzlwBl*%rFdtNLqc$H&ni@&G>q?w3Qpl`**QslGuwG`T=G4a$eM;*H68gF@L#C+`0NRCgG)`t4PL;gl@;1Gd)Qh5Jh8CaP|P&`3+ z`zxHx<#vhoM+zH=Sa3>sokqC4Du_f)YbQnM9`86SG2TaZse4Ea>4&=_^=hP=_|qvv ze4>f%naP(BI(c@C4}o2F{uJ3U|}A z_tdxI@IGa{>FSuTXy=tJPpN&=R_j9a0(kBui#m=m&CpuC;5P}1_T3v6cRytKUbT8G zT7{eBbDT!NqHy_SScUJOpf)ZHN)%ygBE}HhLAnQ_SWn%LaJa8VUsjt{ps)No+!b&~5>+DO2WpxwJH^cYl51+Ov*O-H@pMWsCI4)tPmY+bC-$24c5*=5385TQTllXr&1* zEMF^Ipn806i-CVIpMC;h=+n@Y+2=PRg_zYV!~SDX)s~IxG*{}VsBe^;@euEk6-PTi z4Ra4u7xvk;F5McQ$`f^@G)8;ByZNG$$)Si6Wd>LJCf*S*mUlyPCmj)-jAEAzEIESI z8N6I>)nn?fLYet)Yyuo3hfvcji89IcoB_RNwJy0a!SWd9j4ts|Dq zd?k1&O8L-xi>xY^o7=7ljU^%Os`M(uhwuBzG<&SyNUWO{>a7oPFNum*Or7KU{c^5J z-4t${mECa^wtGw!0InH)k~Ln!9pQ(I)4eVpA=9 z(OnfMkKa~Ye7o$WVi1kqXw^#?eO-jC6GC`7ZF(j&1?|s(!p!F6TXSx|fa=tPS;B2T zh&LsE_Q#)0ilSn9bMrU&^fJ_r82m*S%2%=0fucjQme~L`g9zu|gou^L+)TT{@})-* zp%Ytk;B2|}s;;LVNu{ao9b#`U^I6lCM$%V8E}aq!pWY*~(>I9sU!cXTHv`nDC+!uU zKj?m#Sry2=Ke!ppYcOhGY-sOa?qU3#MlLYqrgpSbJrEf?$s)Izkvi%vKxLlObTr0h zkd7Vog?d>96$Ip}AJz#8vAeVtL#PvLsl`}crOKl~S}N6G`jLo4cy%KU`U`m*xMrHq zIGSj(M!uodE<%&Px4R1suhomXoA)}Ar#NU+D_0`Pt(K#tq$ zeWP~G`=9DC;mN1%Om@qS)8I@^xP$ic1?uYX&y}7|(;M{G6W6C(Ffdk@la#EyR*6n-$RhYU*8{#+U4DMvC^=yH?tPbfnvV#(-Euhpm)|wyPE=Z z1;buamtFXf>F<#)eIYX8{|E+l5P1-Rj1=%?N0<^(ct;e6z#ozgp> z$V`%3hOOu$p{{7sPEyNZ`6hV8hO(3}w1m3EC}rZ?F?4=e(C{1A_QgXyud|%HL~l&& zaj1Mpe{k((2{&^zI|H~{ZgEJ>i`bMxg$WXzJTgK<{Z|U*o94g zL%NVIUyhwzZ4&dh9J@H7iiIdDzKlj_fGH(T-z|E$BK@QLHZn2=(D_~lb1Wve4b1x) zKRF8IGDN&el6muqSuvHGm7yk9#3muSz^QqSbyEV7M7fdi_z6Y531w8=l9own|H$-K zsQu&D^!W+@@J6ZRC>o<_v;=F~_WHu;niX9$q`ZvJ!botT%+6?KYt*f}{NfRL_RCw8 zl{}>z5QKX6vyHW;|BZ#Y=?)sFvwMDZS8Um^rk@{Hz5K3jaa-6sOs2w`^Y>o22isV&NS6C1_eqyLlbvgoI4yZOn-Hh~*6IWWoE+~&K9 zG#?I{*^SqbXQee!PBqoTY--xi9o+Wm1s2=oN;`C4#$z#j&|H}ddQsPyRGO&Y9CD}r zaYY5*t`n-8Bt(1jXPH#Swb`n-yowHFrEE1DsXTe`Y~S#C>KEQRCv$sHlsaC(~O3ltK{vcY7SqJBMJc9KN(84Qjlzh#v95Z{71;F zk+au=2%5QsS>aFDI*R}BN6x>L90F+mzkOZq30{PbG!a1W^2EV{Xqr!E(*dmsxNBAh zgkz}q=O8hen`}U+(lR+MO%y!w(QjmrF!d{=4qy&&QRAAxx<%sV>y?i%<_ zgTQGFndShIcClcR*#s=--6Ue%0g(?flLx4ZuNUXPDAlq7j51MGRRtxN38yez5I6=N z0?am+X-}{5V8;1PBOVSLgWU0Q3i#c{AcB`74M2Z7>4z_2kF40=;}X)5J(z@j2zC)U zaPuSLZPY>Qs6N<+WO)r~e|7mIyhal*IB!H}}EPTCdiKYSn;d#kJf^JUAD``Qb z8`+lQpE}bxx}Sae*HIs(#husWSrdnDI{)n^`@;?KeQn~)R6W3^l$cDp0Up~AK2)*2c^5c#2m<;%? zI?ZY!?Eta@GhZK3#A#d0sRw%~G5TuP_yP%ny*3X@)*+m7vj@W9`Qoi|Lb?gw2Z)gfO1pBfEx2I*c+XifkGgI0*mePF0@ zRd(qcs8sBoTZ#yVp7kwbzKxOR(o}63k9>vLwK%U`d%xs~xD^o06Ve~ShC;I9@FKe( zbVJn#Oo<(Eh(@AIe-gq4&bsO7t;-jw#R*ZZJ1{bdW1Ro3-|;RyP}gzHKj#7fcM4>d z-Za3}iH8ZFg0Rh%`N!XY(A-a-8cTA)o7w$D<)MZ)5iQrQ=fEt)tP-9kr3ZOiF^g4t zpHWmcTB?tk6$GA33bg<(bk|G7DMT=#_-^BU)?2Hyh-?mk%G8J#JvG$8e=u%uP2OSC z)~1|{!Hdo>G2fv@wfhZvX&@mqj-?-LTK`G`g9mRA>n`#f6kIDvf77Iu(ew6c<8tfK zBHl%d`?O6)H}@^`=Dv*a@$ENz zYp%(Mx)dI)uKnxM7G?S<1_X!VyI2!fW5~2&co)d_V$?eSVLOG-sQ8?OOf*cZ!|liW zr;F1OcP_5i^(%YdLZgG}VG;cVf_{c)t>f}y)WEH6VfK0Kf3xr-W6*OGNeUdNl z;akR6ztYQuy_?`A)h@mrLo{t?wz0tVAmgWP2Dm!pq#nc|rBFc+kYqd=qZY{RYg5`Ad%b@}Dz3xB3AbQCpQI>hX+WbH zMhpHsQxFIhPV`pecrd6j&>duYW1-?aS|2Nnjm6(oBYRIGLh>}J^ohT2Uy?8bwpytZ z2d@;b(3O4a;}a$BL|AG9m2Ky^P8DrUiw9K0DuNKOsa`4gK#@TZy;r7#=(eUe)b!7; zd~yY!sDt|FTrG!ttt9rc`!bJdnzg54ESgSWwx;8R5_BYa4;v&L?}b3R9LmCb@p=?*P+zs9z)BK zJ((P(oO_n)Rt;9eWWl84gh_%9O!p$5XR&)@|>Sndhb=GYp*qS=Y1Wi%w$dEuGxX#-;JO3XxIEp<3Aon+E1gNph5gr?N%rV}!av^u8cLU zvbZiU$e?O1eiS-X7x^_YFfQ@WMC$W-_DJQ^rK=bAE+3Y^t%RI#6O)U+=EYW#Dd3<~ z#!exxMGw%FiHo$m7d<*{Jz8banJL5|B&yi?`!);CgX*(53G?i5{j_0^{C?sYvuC6q z%;Vn?=vmLfJlCj&i>Of}Rhc|23*UL%cG#HiQd#+@3VI?C9lVAuyWt_t{hfbO zSvZ1LRK8Qs;9v;Y33>&MPPdf44R6f8^pvF0G-Sq~BKlvUcGoe6dQhLj6H6CMOiSfb zmY_U4ucCnW%|{t*I{DxcC(1FA135IbXUxW?{s*^M2r9UoJe_W*v}dm3QSv|~f9aeX zU)QYLef}D*Q3#6>YYxi345iV5Aiy@{H&G zHaMycslfwDvyWAl$TMe1XJ7wl;`10SZ#!94zagX8H-m3!q+euzGV-=W-tILqE0fLx_V@Z0YPDf}o_^d;K;-{VR6`QJVW zir_Xp^+vM4q1Lq_3SWgPHc=c3gKp3}$7pZ-aC@A02ywb_-m_KTV={(Hc4ukfP5Vsv zn=!A6h4s#r$gq2CSFxn91nDm~4FlQR`^xV3M~3{J-=Hn!6&L^Xu>bxu`Nft4EnI9B zYn|s69Y!4E@Vq3Ms(IRCFkLZQKL+leUNSluk{04i0(u@d20=^281A5YtY~VOS;OKz+IYO~$Pd#)J(jJsw&mXYfmd;y% zz{)Z{leffKstoZED(JO63!I4u1jT*akl;liGO8ij*4GFWi6Zpwc$4}J`;Jv?WyX= zo;;X*#HA{c>QYEq^DEB#lcISu=_p+q{jHl{Y!v$C{vwp!%07SuxAU*>mK<*N?< z*s_i!^VplnoN#hjpwIYEx6>3hP%d=A&V~mK5I3$Y!I%?tusA8IQ3gjfj zfIqV+K{V+T7!ZfrTf-iMaj&4Kuu+0aPeJR#{q`#JUqjh@GZAkz4=GcMFSADkxV^k*uYn=vd z{3da%EheYb5)G4wSM=L^dXVX36bm8IYp4)yKDg0~K#y;q2m=zA`%9$e`ws$;dWaPu zLPpInq+Ul$jDO|XHhQ(vG#FE0oikiK8kzX?3tiF?sexNBZHrukr@ z(6DCW;J!2rxt*h5vUQk4shBEJUr>kym)r{-{f_4U(Hu8|Xk`_vpAh8=})fy)agkVqntTs@2~raNv~edJ3(Ac%P%01 zxcq`xO#^JS(Orq$Bd;^ou?HTuoO)9U1%EPRNTNR=4b6YGsb@drjj47%qJ-PU)BIZ% zj1rd5Vhyhebd+B4%@J`Shsfr{*MSfijI6CiG$yx8lluBp!5@#qo>?bnT*683?nz!v zvR;-i%sG`Bu;j{3-At1)Xw8%+ns({D(Uo{=echqlEMwr|zz%Mr-)Oo%g+>BtzWU#w zQfx*(t-p~Z&}$pu{vUq*|Cw1b$aepqk8()N$gDm&svoFK!Em6A36mR6p?R;g$P=IC>6W-Z??#*l}0JEMqI=C&w@m-RXo;+ zzPbu`(ze!~ahVYXI7?K1H82pHso4Z0wexgap zWgfwUl|R_m$5C_Aty1kYT~jVU6a~TfTwHG8+(?kwRfDUZbms``Zk7iqIyJrxNUon6 zy`f;T11(lXIpl7j-^|xx56}Rk3-E9|HNWr$T@NB7xarsYhak(&7XJI1`vd1DG{}nE z1gOA7=HL#k!2^{dz@6-0gB}U<#>1i?B#WLNV8WvHQC1PSD#Yn_a~nh=9*J}iTYLff z9(+f>-w?E_oTr%LF3y;nBMJ)few0a`?Mg^71+n(9&)%iwzGAli(vlLr`toQ0xadDr zItI#+lcE*Ty++YVfAJB&qR)Vrthk)QxotUHrR*|Z9M#R}&mw}Usxm>SOc*vY!lny7 z%%Lv-bEQ+z_^8@y+w~4|3$#zM-A5K=dBaPiYP3D{OBvi;pw2NOhYXx3e3^gEK09xf zu`FFI?%xHl282@`?P2|)!;f=8<9QR%6L-8jkX`=!J0cTHpda3W;#1&XAp$)cK`CMW z9BfYBeTj^@ilMM37v6W&JHYh}QM8-_3W4N9+`>Mr9Wq713K-o$SQR+7sn@R`4$u&3 zBY3_*z}wjtlOgn=K-!D%kirH6Sq70Y&ob!ao3|jd7p5DKx+J-?3*B~uc-!O>ceRh3 zVa?Y)EFK|cW&LDQ8zit`Jth{;+r0j{99-Y*8RZ8F%iVTxoH3(c13^x1ZZ5R-#4pCX z*+-W^q{nP?4HoUSF0oP%_2B*_1n1d20960zY~>R-Zfrjke~7ZRq=kA-%g+zQZXy!h zn!1%7$*!Hhz6M_XmYqqS+-@$Lla-}@aEXvk4SU!Z(dhd6&6mlPSePMk^b1YDY4kMsg`(dFh_Ft04#GgW%is2fgg1FZP7Qp zq!wXvhs}H=X-Oo#c`@ykA(S|O>dd*45l=hl*Bai8vx=A*&^?NGSGR%Cm+NKYbhEGQ z?>--nEPMYnS%rzTkMm)BV&#{Y{UK~iclXxs4`DAMqNT-q(_qN>WNj^Ft#DoHM@5%> z;fua2jNdbI7aX;<^s(Rl`F8D<~6~WGet4u#oJB@8Oq${L)Ia z(1X;Mzj~~^RCZphtJCae^n-}ZCYbjyMv>0L#u_e>E(`g~H+wNSbG8~Gy40OQD91dW z?ZqdcUla86K(|Vn%^I^Q-)C{>DL2pU&9Du%opLHnhFLTi--q7S4=SU)YU&%)OM#oIRsKK{C4^ZQ9lu;{nE;Ix4%B@Zg^m@2ll-Y#SLEQLvGU#jN z-2RX8|Pcd+MQkuwzTKA|rUG6c}sK%@!Pwe$$ecD&TF&R^7 zf1ghfcPUzPir!*}v*=Q$Tz#X`Ce2EfD#!S{b#cD?6{wa%i%~Q*m(m8cIx;wZ?`hXY#dLg4QrzZN{q4Jx|45Ye_;u&|KjvG0tZBA82_?Md z;ly3#=UxjET&{e{aQy`)V=Q~LvNb6S|EiT%>Mr*iu5jr~o?^`7T-}`2!hXR%-I@Z= zqmYwaFStFf(=1TSFIF#Cg_HN7YrXfhd#o#@<6hUj#TQviAn5H#Qj{q0J9rZ(f7Ozl z(Y{)4n5o0OTONWJxqHD&yZpj6syoDe91eFvU2L#!l}u5GO1xAfK*w?ojjEN8lvlOZ zn3jmt_&8+gq^X$>dL2*N4+~_MaY(57ZC;9Ushr5l@{DbU6?O}jQiXZu|0o1yD)r*S zE%w321|~@cuc1eid9vcYmBm^<0P&NpZ3qs@#2;@!=s?LWP65%Pu=nVmsCE{C`sS@p zu&cb#M8kdTZPkJHI^F6*(0p9{66gKM5Q}fd%|G*Wv3}E5wpLXOjtJg-cI89aM75f_ zOugxj+A{)9nJdAKgTdE)(eSAit9)sqt+hQ0EBo@SXo*#NGplX#MJgpp9pvxEShv^7 zqbAxxE>skc(Y%DR;?scYBASRHDstn>DZ#5bPV*a+N%Yq@C-AV%FMkLY)U+P*$jYhj z2ypym!f^k!Vv-KGD#4Yn-jLxAm2}o|3d>mJ&YHjLsk|Q|3!q zB`;Mvt@M=nzLLNt6-5#hv~Th2PUxh>D6@??~Nc6~9!idCIi& zMxpzzV3Lwww8clwq_u7Ilg#$iMUfOA;X^Z7n`lXDxC}8Yw8Gs%i-Q_ol$2|$MlW2 zos!M>laGMRabgVO4?1Im{Lz=LL_qX(nQ`WsdtD}z%nhqzfh_EN=pmX|BRK0UWM1NS zDcfhEs1oSk#A>3LGdloxQYYJ79s9$!Oo?A#O!ydgdiI6@FflD)SG&W+66} zo)Ebv7zt-B-oHsAx~5#0bcLP1rMgVH;!)4pgIB-|3zM``*An;h z>j!#AY)m%v^Lq9*-u6`=+(+H2Yz8Ui$R@cHQ$GvPm(zL(hs*p#K{{)1{tdI2i+1@w zY=`7A8~W|Dn&s}ZuW`~DyFLzH-Q#@U?CW(en4_D@e*4=Znd^|(FY{Qzxt{~)n})45 zjL4j4j2KZ;G6^vblutruHs4dcHv%Bor#UsbcX4Jt`cZaWF-OIiWp3dXjYYtOTj#-5 zW4F0Zlv}c-ETp~~#j|$dPl0wi3LRc?e39`!ad?EJ!Qmf`TMRZmWKqh5XMLPT(Y-2; z6O4zm^)_E7J4Y5vN3R4k_IX}mOuDg!;lrw?i*!(H1>=G47-Z|MG7;Y;Rvw@If+{i) zTuxCp8EEIQPZf`Xp~SoF&^a&BQK7=AlASzdtTk<=?qR-ddFNvUwW|M)Lofu`DQY@F z4@JDSgu%b6plHRmFxEMO6xSvex-9sJwNqJcixw}N@@uy9V95J~Q2~W)L>qx)S!F?E z$(=188?8%!FF0TM(EI9Ke{>Wy{NFV?1=d zcb3$zY)GsILFnL;_o&MCkK7N3*n_s&#hQET}eyy&qQoI%f?w^auxm))eMuzq`gMZ{@vm?{dMQO>vl6s1X`=^W>%+yXqi{4>$*aPkC+M$v{BwWeU2im+AeNe zzEP_8BcaIKAhggt$9N{QD#ABvbpFZmWPD84EKMY!er25HgPaL%X9JdykMiWV1DWKX zXPHXlEBesYM;8mvI0mWF(H*&Vq_ox=@12!tU5}^Rh=7cox`#o=F|n@Ev@=*fPTX6O zL3Jkpo>=)Ge)}|)TG^bji^(j7xJvy{!pIQ0P9rE2Fy z4y7jT*reIW3P=mIdRn6@%5Awy!H#hsEr!rzB;TCn85nVvR-nkHwNcG5*79|GFC_YU_y&8;-d6J+mqyka zr#}4b3|lSpO8uJ`s5e3}4hypyf|H(6(I)hhkShDLdS4RFi>%W!n|WmT^$7v&&`r>w zcnkEI1svNn$$b^TrG%=n)a_jZ09u7@&+BV%DK3%o z>6bQ-r7sHsCV*k}xKw!b;c`rjRn({O>I{8zRANsMu-2G4+*#9}dN1@(B}f5q2&jFO zxH%P7yqWp*^Gl<0*%ayvDRw448{5z54CSuQj-eOy)StCC40;IHeOS0_?D_n=rA>C0 zgqF*6zJs5Q%j3%t&cgD(f*$e<{UOOlr*LMCot*D6_T9hCr+3@V#^(Jk5f03H;vSkW zqf-YZZ0ghFgv;fUxo00RG4${MzS*TRI3^M(T9ZE0T*v-h{#1Se(j%HMo@T>PV)Vz; zU;jA$9NMlv+zSkC=8w4VAsiy3Lam6S9I1jm%T%oE#9PEo*2lfeDcnhqs%d+LIsC4W z@0Bu*;Ooh8=6EZJ1tEtkdH48xM{`KK}HgPCzr`4lH6yyB4O* zb=@QYBiU-}RW4oDT;!FE`hX{6(t1v&JEYK({dw9h4Q$fPd#7fd#AQ&GY9{OKl$=zV zB~M9*Cdbk>_&$7M7yAhFqxhILfBcmKhDuBQ(}>mNN<$52YBi^!acY5v!0#m*M{h}e z>zC5Fe5%IX?|+{0*GO*@)KQ!N$yf5qBjxJlozGR7hT4KUI`W)z`YALzdL}vJ#LLOt zyEZ?r-5Q-l;Cb0NEC#QwqjA*$OB|{${VkOlbnOn3GGRR=hJ86Q@9Gi0ZGXs63$WeH;^>qWGIup>#LK)blK+h2NrHJes^4qk;(2$X z-g^7M7!Kma4wcO}_jLz5qmr>=KGXB@UcTquAcT7D_U(UOHMuRAX{4E;^!ncMT%;OK zb23#Vj~E(y&7U;Vr*?18|8IQ$4M`;LxX`!jnjQu$A?5k+Lt z7KoA>pNNR-7#96?c6OCP z1k;q8(S2}OxdUvJ9CVp&FZ}QCvr&^+eNqn7NPmF(0vuQ4#`f^@QN$4x)U9*5enW%S zIpojaK#~I8E`=RWN0>_m*(Z_eFo;91sU3+1BL)FN_s$&+{@?$Fd?vKwdG^cV-(BQB zfe*N%(Q_9mMYo&jO5tIChvW66?zc2asuT7+G zOE8SO$PXD{@V|!Xyy_#NH@CF?{~A)a6Sa#nNQ9(?XC<0;^C=%=>L_zIGipQqv6J$K zA*>VG0zgIbcW#U@g8e%6kBr>V(Mcfq+GORr)I%_#7#}#>^F8I_ul+SL0ZFma3;rt} zgRn=wvCnt_YYzzjcjJ;Sm3;_G_zw$!PsR1W?&;s;t6TquGDY_4JZ$HBdr1NaE?9_a zc|amHBrE-|$YuI@xA(Gbtd4E)j~ujrgThI!{z=STNzvsnAJPB&S{x(=KruD&zvxaJ z7mlG`2kd=&u`hx;xdkq9-fB<(2^$qH>XFjV*Moyt_LSOXub;lRbIvI z88x^Sh5lAKU@GAR1AVI|Je=X%gmk6?MRLH${DLZ9enQlkpKU)9c<= zWV&{(K))IMYZc{9u(cJN3u7x{FEmL%)%Dy#WVc|U>A?cnNyl)#J ztDr=N9Qc`fzE@G%vw-vkcgO(?xVKYo+Whu{6Xv64x(#X1wA@RJ{Bw2n$$QarlallR z?*zJy*`K5nT>0!(;M!GN1ch3W8gDUVe4TS*Vq$`AsT*>GfQSVbcNNGIrCik!Pd^e4 z4opCCSs4+%Oar72K-sbap1os=Pdk7#UiII9@7)cNjj9w0O-(XQ!*s;c`vOsre9!d}$pDUm@Ak&YFka=&ByfJ_C6 zweWq0!DqX0Z^jPc9oDIgJd}D5yy6Rx=9q!cFsZI5FDEVS!y8w#-mWz?htCfYI>X&rw@SBu*t%@O-rlQ{cmtn(M>ucfpjBa0%s+4`0tDJ z^1cGhe7zY8l_x|%%xX7u3#RkjMxX5X3Q4ot7$h8tLdqPZJpc}sEntDBC?a%4 znLmjWAEKF8Zsdp!KbLjnf}LpMCff*3ySyX6VNxu^r-lH0^^!PjEn;P6()>L$y&R|H}1>yc;2qc7aa8II9R5M$)0;atknc;HLCG@4bRbghYa;8wqIL7bx(K zg}5(`Q&^Y4bPy2j!9jSY{{XUgR*PQc!bn$-ZJPP3UL7?TDgTD~s6{V&2bpwPwFNPg zhuNZ03p(-LWm4vwMk3{pqq*2<1B_W%gXx&@cHHP?yopz~npECbs4-l5pTcnmx3g@I zMX;dUOb)Cn4lcKRD-f3UACxyBcJ+Dj?tA9=qDTd}?Nz$XhEaq2HUNXY|MuBz-*{0q z^EcnEDZ$O|c8Gp;wsYd{2SS>7VPr-8;+434N&*Z=Kk83PzzKM5lKDLZJo2AIfj{`OA4Z>u|HCE?l{JY)U5^Z!^~p2vp3=@qs5Q4eg`&%nCcz1B@CC3FKGs*ACk|&EP`%Tha8Wow!*madPz(;u2lXG9d8z^jx+f8ER~&Feqf(Dc5b{x^76qK68Q$MFp^GJ9oW%P(up9W94%bSp0mF zQeNA4LG2Cmf*L%&7396y2QlkgM4`>;Q3Yer;6#eMB2BphP>;qt|KATW#DsDz--VK1 z3G{yS=matwj)2fY+{Nh%51zVu!P;;bXCW*XRm{VN_3-`UtINE{kdExRIq3k>W$&P2 z-mND84)6mB!|doqSQ<7ee~0yOPIU|u^8<}KF!Rk>I10?YR&tU&O< zN1rqUhc_!(z$Ha2>I)#`~fdFZzA=`6$YDxrc>+r{UnT z(z&r9%?R6RO3uTnyx&~^z5Y+Qs!zM`wm3P(;$LY)vhtttF8raLdN<~;#vdT%-=Fd* z5?6&|^;X;85IB|uI;2{4!S;2n#G5Jnz4Kog3$NBIgoYzBTK#`J=$X&ERp0*S|;d zgcc3v*awk6eo}^1`hB4upsAn-q=HbMDM+`lGnv76lAm*_k1LIGne#OU| zDb`ZvWbn-OkBmse`vMmnm5BTHmBI&Dq8K7Qr1zjf2E_fW^N^ok^HxS&l4G@;m#ksS+8hE+e7;ot#ZAgD@Qj0^ ztGhe&I&xmDCETzuWkGUh5*C{W06wO1@YkyfRKQ%ezP6@h&Lm}85At}t#CecZ`IUJ+ z`?BxBDE9BB!tPLr3C;*|(kb|&@H##O5E}3@O7IiFmCQ}EF9>m|kcL4#RiVcwzONN> zMjY3AdG_OSGj1`r6^GHkbml(xYl07K*Hk`?$%lW@mNDS(cqDMzg7A2mFGsl+`;cT zucVtVdka#p&+|%NLgZ~TqwH)kBy?S~?~mT!R;5JY%W~U~X^#DS9Kic@pxPGvr#Q3r z={2REVrjR#E8xR<#wN;NV)K=@6B?4ZQb6tx!VOP|#uddRwzZ-+s;#NnJ1D9s4mNJ} z<8LbQx&QvxJ#0`S`~qD?==m6V`w5zg*p`AsH%NMP%-?O%4tuGJ-(U3tZAXcwDP+^p zHo^0_?0aZtMFJ&z{z8gy@b9@IM*fttQ7%{+))v6LuM`hSxvb{8>05}PSLk%9;IeDi z>v>}l^5@nQ@f8+4Tbi+Za`Zj$BI;l(oI{x@Ip;Q{U@Ks!*~3#W`WvBTa1ZAx@pNzd z*?OfU@=7GA-J`rqML{}2T*Mk{=ngJ!%UDc2K;Ab{?`lO4Jw$@>URc}VH z<{3hQSk-ZzTcyg0Omn>q;$pZ=>bJoUUiKsb>&brevKA|zJY$Vf_Dtbjos452xOPPq z;brTiiGPnLqxByaa5s(M>{<0#TS&;`Ly#m2M!LGypPK2MT!O3KM}2hRTA77wK;6C49jG+@?vGw9Leb!O-Sh7rY9i4ki;nc*L=oRR)w<=^ow4;CQph;3i=gb@#;At7e?>M;Zq`O2& z4^A1_$)t?}-63q~tR>_L`eYlWvIAQw@DuI=K8KRyS+B8Ok@Gj;FH zGWlsgT2b2_CZ=XJy-8h*GwgK%p}-;sY@A!L5=R7P+Kw>~A}MG-DJ&5kcp_GKy)Qjg zFBI5-D6(a5j@{Nf<~es{G8p2nLXN)+&c$;Ko%4jV%f^KlG83XG7O&(ns}ktH9ddJ- z@D-O7{3=10?=LkN^Kfmz)S#jMTVZT`F*7C+N}rf&I=f1`hv*6p(R_hV!^@X0Kh4UH z7d=GLFWUyB%vz2s@BVK7S~>K`;&&y-3hqZVt4+KfSK(wO5`;(Q7av>rLJ`MP8gFbH z{C6r|+slwF?s?8+9hM zK~O4XlbR;rccMH*Ve`%k2e%HjPjrX}T{Av_ZCX=OXcRX(R<<{^NA0uBJR;x7UYGH6 zpT$EL8HFrg0mPqP*fc?hE0Su=@eZOK`Z|phj9&^s*vx8f)$YkfJ0NlM(V1 zX{J?!Tzth~sces9q$1k>13*M^yBIcYi9MdIvdOyyhZm8ed`mM$5=hhz0`czN-6sDG z8L_!I{?f#W7k1*8#S@^v9d*kU*bl05@mDS-;TKA=Tl^Rm7qP6b?2A`{5GQ7ZsRUq+ zBt05qwm400^fI!RGbFBabb3fXADxd`_ob&^j9f)d7~>7*ke(ziCn?Gil!+E5MlK-a zy&A0HWe>QRcU0V_5@r}UNn5$o@+g{9Xvjm%uy~yA9+Per17ezA&=LW0YLmMmFM^M* z2_&H{`3iF>#+@+#h(g2Al%(GxU|=5I&QVgn$x67*X^VVWxBW1Vh=l;Hmv4o#PfH(5 z?Dj~3HyG`)kK-$EGzOB~XdVe;Wgl7|;6=qN-?@o3Tc$&nYG`o>3K(9EXHJn|KD zp!%c(2tXIwK*iD^U@7@sOii*0cbb#;x~j|XwIU8FFZ~<=I}fUFLpm$UH!WiXpNHcp znH0P234aUQ!+xqTq3wcW-0#8jf_6&&vD{GCgLG=zCs#DQGrvIUKjrr#WItbRyjcoY z45dP8CQrC{f&w#vMd_AQk%-uRM;=V+(c969t7epFLR}wJZ(&sA>>{EacJh&q1f50{ z1~ht%b2fNvh6j`|8Jw8#;^sc(*_`V4A*aUl`E5F3OMTcCv#egzm$&g@_p}_^n zwST-mzc+I2iMw+7@1_@E%ov=m$SG30Kf^^qm3vqtIQh=TZ6z5{iSCyD4H%%^Z$Y;G zsY$gpD(O8d#Gm1)j}DpzcsvS&v@e2*8){MFexzTke&d#XO(}+8m)N}q{nw8#8%j1} z&kM~}5syU?yu>C<7_8$y_-|Rt6=yx1z10+0V=$(c?(=$x+_$6S)#%THo;!Sg84P!o zVQ_;H-LtKGh2tc%Evv{Zxnb%Pt#=63b+mMubSN?FqIVilo8mDS8brvmyNv+q) znzn|Fn{b=Ftn;*AGt#|Uh`!J2Jf699GH$TlxU7J?hnm>ATi-VSkwS3xtN3fD@zDzO z499%e1i3_dP2<)%l^mKV>5zuhUxMu*UYAiaTl7YRyREb;rd4<0^ICPWn5TVl$z2o# zS52nMydt@si+LYufA9S9DnPp-_f_ywXT`MAwKt|ssZH0OwpSme2zI|+C3-!1Od!fM zNx$Mf^>erU&JZhUyJ>I4)kO$=Vpion_DcnNot-uyIHnG zTNa()P@YWI{yB>l#UHWDWHzF6L7yz#5H(lv`i57O%cn%8|9eaKiznV|l64os)D&0o zHtt{eMK`r?qVvO;ipv;3Z#S@ctoS_6~6uxn)8=5NAD;2Mw#on94NWV_DbdSmY zi(J%QL&P7i(!C06F^?8wM7b}i&?5cpcOUr~=gW&zao=tFL-{BC!)Fde0fP2}^qaO# z6{Sf7swfc%aN3%$F)f?=xjxGyCCm5F_{UrjD6GX3iXja-Hvn03SJvAaTaOmt za`}8I*I_czaORiPtWRLie~4YBLeKWWBld`iipZdlI9uEhn%;@qajp%tO}oavFQCNK zNCI@?ral`k^X&E!!%bD=tp}cCQz+;T)!r-_Fk)O!3)ecugGg)EqY;=Z+@%zn#qW={ z;RsH=RBuUMm0yf0r7COJxe-+E3?g*)#RZ#o$&hDAj}+u78UWq#d4ZN2H$-7Mfi<=4 ze(#|OKHEnFTPe3sw_f?{`!z; z@-oJWYO9FzX55eM4j*{Dc^~Q^7Ju0BS>}*-qjO4t$hv3gP=$ zS2@wH9DyZ*^KNCNDRafJ|12Qe#fsQeji8g6`2-gIvS}HaZj$!$4iLs$nnUjB<^+J* z(Ap?=W>?#YAyVw2Es&Qb_|$)cU)^pCB~J65Yay-1xSpVy>%?tX0+&c)`Ar=jHxtvX zCeEzO5G`+T2HMrF|1Py@@I<;F zH{*O8@JU3c&@sQ~fu-95_*^OJ1s?s_xA&M8R7(K`^P%EHIsW=~4FUttYU%_ABUJ?j)=F>l&7N$@9{y_+X)jaV_uIRxs1!!PY ze{!iDd6oHls_R!V(iaT&L*?Nh7$lqq&?>dCKnc=`Mi@_|9-S@3K&FIYe>EJMMW{Q+ zZyCLjPCXQ)?uofAoD!oGv#QfK-6?(rF37dW9=edcnPh)Q<#g(RDRa80%hE8>X>-xY z7faseu83s+3T3Jqj}4K^_SG$F+%}mN8(O1X zSh60*`U)LF(1b)t`_cBa;7NiIdNa9QtjQd`_Yk6FON=~XnmeUX9*m7u&{Oy~4LTVSYZi!|ly48n>vEgcnVz77Bz5lX+ku-)d%f z{kzKH^m>PKgYC15h5@Nvl?Q}hHQiH1Tkg@5f8XSaY?Ot7S=QI}U@G#AXbjkysYqi> zlS26cnk;7L)>+y>l6w~kJXW4hxb*R;LQ@kO%`ydvN*tK5+E$i#Exo5W{TaW!2)INJ z9t+c4Pct)Z^jN(5({`0*lhRVeX5S*Oy&X4Py^dq2r8w#4>m=#$va^ zeZF^#{mVR3N`BFN_JFE(#3Z6?C7KZJtdtT?upnG|hc_V#*m`iXUX(fGs+Kt;%6v<9 z!~Dy$csnUrvaXh%XfzB!WVm8kSDsGsgR|bu$IFOX+89dy7q44iQOQ|t$A#zxRJyR0 z$+WXQvzmVY+cHPsxrb>H678iReofK82x2eg_#~0o%iv{-cFNi^+MjzWb4f(8_u9Vm z{;XGVR_BP&yFpY{SiI<6}&(vDw?4GfSUtjAIz2w$i&$KWadWD%L(qTccZr*xx>g9=}HjnbxQ8vuECXCy1Ze-?0PS}um3bI zLP8B!EA;Z4j{6rv#YhnuBXax?k8B{R$fsfb2a83V-DJ!eg(d73>Ik=8-57ymG@*7{RCu$+GW8Bl02`1IBQF(YeVu+P89=fQ20 zAlE>kG{EFD)AI05mKLHc2ogOY1Ng^t6(yx^AdH;eWU)?ri~%Gl`W0j%?@dV3-E?Ch zjwk7jYpzi!DmIzxTqA#T<$_~^{NO=^0^t%fX--D=JkbNU5s4SB^`Z+ z?&h4WKm1CLLiQ?uzdyP7OMou*U^9miW&?B43!HQhR{L3YuY!MeK=c_Y*NInu7NMKX z(?q$eUlv!Zm<$JOgD=Q$>UJUOyEv1DP9Whebyy-_{NZcA{iW}Ti_nY0AgJ`<0q{q? z_lKjnUg=lp!X*X?CykIPM`R5r-?tBs#Kl#DpHK=$C;R|2DQ&<8gPuV7Q|QVW0j>c8 z8-ccFOuSdF&2X$|4>JkeH;gZRVY&oXnT#v@fj_-lfyn*uu=gph0^;03v5}vFw`FgqE4Bs#a6si*sVc?wQ zGHUVVKA)Dq{`3L>Hz|-HgAdEs-jai@(%{W^Fz450PdGjV{Nnfm&05``MVnKU z78l`pEb2dr53Yc($nn$D**O<{UaxIlcPWhlX#7|pXdw(;;%eTTqvJU#hdy7Dr*3oV zLjD(>)Yqk9kj!5cmK_=8&F&Kng;*!(F?yKjx}jL7;()A2pyOLJL<7_nD3n*v7wK5? z!>-?wg1Ye;ngHM14s}&y(oR+(s-0FmuG0DSk%E!83TboD0}!`LeEzgL%aNh>B0UGn z+5!DMRlct)OOnHnaj4g&uPpgm4yE+wc;Vx0k|{9l0V^=J zuJ4XUp9}YB(nYt=ip2C!O<6C3E$FM?9W6qpyV)I=Y|ehW^n-YoV8mIDDqmD42}hYl zauzUXs|kqP1kYBwyJWEnrzQ=Ha4TQ>Yp8?v0FdFmV4ZVifnl=0fmvCn&7R>PA8UUW z^#1!rH)2`x@C?B56ajp#>|@>U2hYR*UKF z2qZ(!a-miQv%Zv*1)Fg!C5eqPSmAT9D5r$8i=cB%U#=lQ&i3)g{J-aJZ)c%yZz@Bw z@*n@;8Q~M|bFh#1pm89&-2hRM5dbN~wM1`lqJra;VO-e99VtzuZgdi*X*q5KpONxZ(jxufH$b=df%q?v24aN# zZi4zpj*+%o>C9~5nVkrCH3~DPQi3d@mEab81!WylhT3)219CSdH5~YKR+@HPjK6peoHvec&bKzZJSGhb4d=%F(IG zdV|28LWUz1YdX#OnegpAEYDsLidqG;@;|}Rd|La!(gaqs(Ls0o*MVy}4z7W4?g+Jl zv)7d=RV5`3jkxdhboAQrh-c&I?}NN3BD(Yf?ilz)mQQ~etNa0e3J*2P3Jyg%x_}DV*wo+l$U6$= zS*{Gn$$IaDP6djEswJGsehr{KC4Ojh`)U2#`MK58=Fcd6y0|fg25!GZ>lgEYHmh~Z z$emMM_H=$hG!?<`*qV$^lZU~*j8mlYR9K`O z$?hyKH$SKb+3Qx8vFk`9QQTB?Cy=x$lh=I$^ZJE{wHyIC}Q_vu$#i6{mJ&k%QpJ7-#xDESu85t!vYmb4WWyH!ce0R36P%Ivu94wqOWk@PT$ZA7VA- z{SDRfuv850)NyuQsnodVW*EyGJ>=-J-CpKT1PmIp<{7IA9spnB#WL1#GV07)eTq;| z*{9g5GbU%S@OSotqV7x>l_4fs^LLe{w z&TtArz2Y#Q0(K>ShH}38s3fBa9{x z6I1Q;2}4bR@JwR!>8yV8S$7U-jXX!GI2SITQKl;76Cs9Q~xqOIu}gHK|?J@$!&@h;76;0 zqiXX*dFJP7ARDyOWV&1$JGtkA-pI-p2%?;rGSa#EApWXHRVkAdP%OAJ#$^M{t zV-fnX73jvBeOxpnQ!l>#3?^4E_;S?IdWY5@Mf^Pl%AFE!O<~|8V+wBw+9#}!WWx$P z@qL(zi*D?zEOri6yBhl}Tn7835yV%1mk0N6&s6Ebqwq{B3Ye>W*p^NjmDlU|}9o_|tP zsOubq>*x(biYraC$Va;Pf_&v&-!N{(z*A8v`Z%!JaQuMq(T$otSW`rMa24%2S=F=o z{PrwGa3c-8_VOK4=)}A?k~Q8%p8Pj$FYFgw(Jr|7a=sV%=Ly+woHmO1q0^RMa8u)~ zbSe2B1G0L)pp!~qw zuvQ5}RqybbTZ-G+@y-v-6mI3qnQ@1Ib!C2Yw7(OZOuQ70lNTYfB7!Zlch+$zl;AWs zAwm68?=Ky2Z*lHsUXK41Vo{K8%skQgw>$|Nh}^>Rk+>D4l(fP?pklf}rxo@gVCQp1 z?kNdkb7at!M!nq`g5`ZZ5KAaT=L0Gh$>_f?47@e&H+A1vY5ebNRVgVW&))g=4~&G^ zG3)==W!zQOFD-eb`mfk%sn{U~i$URo(!W134=Q2>JI&t4Sb(ldQ0k|{0jyml2WT7a zHuNKWINdkAOfN&0iDLu%*E20;By4xhSlT zXYd+-8rJTE{Ry!swOH9YRU$43caDI-QUbXZ-jC9=(}e9{r3;%?BDe=%5dKDX5h?RV z537!FRIup_k^Y7qL^DTV6=vBsc=Ap~LH-HXCdhDZtZskf18%h8;ZO4;-(pD>*jsjB zPrW*nz7i~7feZGA>kEF6zJeyvPh>MY4VX*d@f*nXSIL%ud1Aj>l73sJpx4*qF{|g$E zqdNgnZEq^)a2jTP3My?x)#a2HL7+Uc!Q$!kI~cMFiS8T`b|&yIceiV>Ibm`4Sowka z=&9EtO}EEJNtTIehz-iQ?9qQ%z~+Y~DRWwSainYu&R{$MI4FY&0N4xfzX765@MQgh zNQ-&k`>)R4Tx|t!_x{m6$uKbYq@x2?9=NaokyO||5TVlgcD?!Dpxy8RMeSS z%|_(|yM}rV+dUKbgrOU%^AYrGVO#Y9$b1ObVrHkLMP?8PU}9&<&Hb)RItin|A~=JH zmOo}AZAXa#%@5`dvpZsanwBYUAs~b=BLKSV@WAuffS+)m0z+SAwv7-8!Hy|uk%n-9 z#+pkJrOY-I)mrjZQS)0z&PLEF_X)Yp9D&O7fU$@h{u^NIqQv)L#d>AdQqT5)L_$3& zS^4mSv;;s~sADo$css-g?V5Mtv1-k|Gr9(v5+f|`%SBV`3q{;d(zXCnm|o_M3CV5P z7;hg|yKtDjZmagTpr+%+Prh+|P{@#yu0BV9nf&^72{=Je_yQs7_X~)2fMPy)>?GX* z+^#PuRf8|~??}1B4FUiQJlqWUt!}fz!Eb?6%x>S9s%B~{A~9c`fExuQ=?A$`$;7K$ za)HCo-Nnl!U2;J+b9<%jVwD%;GrYISca#~r1;W7|`{bRE>9~TuH(Z0$0ko^L?IQ{{ zTuyj}u^+etr1B*(rTtQ zD^oiKbi~~%CPQt$hT+98d@hJTwNXMuv{l7)`&6~u_kQ677` zvOi^Jt;Q9=?Q)9rQ2)*5hGd09Nm%>_wjYvr2^99m^B))mR(Qvn`U00I$FCJRyrEBs zqrgm4b}zAsu<-2GF3GcAC$Z-%qnG&@hEgD!767h2S+#G*E;fKzp5)x~AfevCrP<(O zD3E2gKc%h_Sh?>w2JhV49?6C1T7r&oa@UfAO{CkgWQeIQU2LEFnW8l4y7QEZ98&GO zMaes8k4Nq5K57IdvogRTNc2%!5MlU1>7xn%%y3`f2|OLbUL6&H z9Q{mHFTMLJCo|EZ9+h`YiKA5bNsZpokFQCp5+S$kyAvpxXLq>vP5Su|dP0ei?#PuP zM8%(GN8NzQ{r6ELIb^a9OLwv8>3ZW8(d)d?V~BlB42aB1ZcY`{(Yhc#>i;EoJKdXb zzp3R<^7ZXh6(NRfb=A7*W5J{de6Z;_G2t~lCsxrK`qfK0eK;)sGa0*Xupnal>A<)Z z(M&wgTm5MSM0lKmSDbKu0z$SYUM#=-$5WP_nfUuiNZastKO@A_RV8#gR5`bOIGCh|Lk7!S9tct%Lm>hkV(OW6I)W)pwYjq?w{!a$Ops zPV}O__}X+IzQ{9MmWpJm-e(7aL+@1I@aa}0zY!(m;CEz}eh0o|fr(6<3ScJoJL|wA zv*EkAfAy365&+(>zSeBFpdWZ5TgYRfUG#Sv9|`1%vjpdRVAwp_58F-T%lHvLrnGvI zei+!Fgi0*z?x|z_QZgikNRaU21z$EA4#gfQO_cv&!GIv9W-OAT6dFp&Z`~Dg^*iKH zWWRexpP+f~jkK7G_4KF#84lm4`wThjFO9GTw_j!x1Q6DmeF&m#3h%PUFH+pl{5E(k zlGFS)0n1_5Mh^YxA^C^qH=}hIcEWU&GHb}PY6-OJTSV*Xxx%G$4#n6QL*&aTIh4AT-O7<3yT&=M**Ew$aZX2d|h$POz)wG8G1+ z2xC$-zW}rq2hF5PqlF+0QiKZmCYR7ZKfZelM3-Elt$PGWbG~%mD@`OEEp0d!YSdP3Zl~U)jRyU#D93dIr5VVuS2r>gr~nM^ec*3<#?T!4tS<)_ zfu!=nv%$tg>~@a)xe?8eMc)nS`2{=kd7ty7NZU1{jK&8kwk^wF+!r8C6JK!>ize^?@_b_C~-Sjlab5=1)thl(qr4)$VH=F1oZa}A`%=tc2!uZ7o zQ~$5N;_k_9?1I~mnwO-tOdODx?qk!Q31UNpxUejQ$rkf>r%`TFs zes`sMS_`S$+E`8CJs`AXhSp-LL@t};M-+dCl`W+&Ra$?GD+n8(P1z)A@=-0u~ z8N_2vE9a{iN^c0w^R$xlB!FGV)^=Y^pB!f6^${dzFn zIqt!DUaTEYni0y{9>w(wA<>;1*IDEr#+m-Y7&}1Gm2o_FWa&mI&OQH6Gg9DJp|6uD~?h&T$`taFNY)ZG-@hEKjRy&OKa8i!IRxe5|sKd~$4kDo;p6osD()f#G9UB`GV8L>5QpTB@Mh7X!cPb-40NXJBoNp`Fm! zNaEz{Y(hYV^@OTvg<4!1)^uhcp3svq$bQ7VPcN74AiK$MF-mbSdgI&SS9}xyEZds5 z6D*jU&qm)b#nIoW{Wh+!LEfCLf~78(q^K~Hm##Mv$HS}m^4Vx&c~4cZVypJxf!ooI zzETjX6zi);gdF+sF5wuQHCH9aB6q`Mmq*;Be)`D*8umTWgeAH0k{ddVvhb zh8LDfnJ>njl~U6>^6=)Br2X?gik6j(020Qgm7hQ~d>|IHL`MJrYqUJZti|^7@)r)O zy_qB)uwI;NI$8~o;I_o^Q>6K|tpwNZ2PmdrL&`3csM8;(FYWuT>tS-WeTuK{Bc9R{ z$+MF3mMkaooq}vv%;EY7+qB|mlAtB>wDV&HmzBBuFuq#K#A zcRPl)WW@;;lYvq9g|IG5j_VWp^68q-_rFez6Xg9VNs=l~+|aV+kOyake$<;&<|^st zeC;2ut9%n!2yaI%8c$Bwt2>!ntkp8c8hixbH|;ldPbI8Z6xvrKwC_CDr50YsB5Do7 zdEY8r{r7X)6m3Z4@+zKYIkh>jWeTNa8H_0!brh7Izd#Yh&e$DDM0CIaj2OH|L33fw zGzDk@c`L)LB|D$N5rm;WC|aUg6F+^#JV{v;wkbGbVfTdf;e<{8RiT{sPXPV)Z~gM) zf9s_DJB37oG<9M<>mdLLhQn|6fG0Oodb+mvhOq5xtnG)IXW4G|i*53ekxzux^m6Xl z%DF@AxcaUD_D3yJy@y3?LXqt`+3~GCX2Kb%N2imB_qTELXk)DNo-C7?YqfIn=?5#Q^KT4W2BO`vV%9rm4&uvb3;}r5 z_B{exZ&@5bTC&_rBx4a^6_Wc@WP{o5O6sEC8#9v4kL)S;C+;U5UU&cln?2)~bCyCm z{l*Ji6~A+i?6wNvffSX zXK*7HkfT!r;;d=pyeM9?ldM;71jO#`#M$|wIa$68=g#@u5wjpM+gDom6yDO;Fh`ni zbD2es=q1veXJ`8zUihF~m=;>Q4nJ=D+)nYg4dFL5t6ayPcAA3MSQ%9jQL*tzoR`?i5_iLloboM`=WE@905pM3b>NH z^xiBh{v%S1W-ZJZZmuK+W5KT*PO@qY&8D)M#pk5a}YAaSUT`CZtg1M-X~zi<->H9yHSCHa=+?hAYb?i}$Jb^L~{{ zK^$vcE)g!$!-tt59lYigIc$|HgCHc|{b6>ETjla65X!iT%)w?ae~~90lK&Z%?UqRM z1+E2yD_4k(%NQm`+_kZGL%S3XS+3b_1rZ|3@n(4%xV&96@x{ z$Hof^?1rh4EB$-Uc|w>vLQIjJn~eY^3QD*-apIO?p2SOjPKsnjjeoacqRwqp!@O&) z(ByP}t6eDZEe-n2<@USJ;|apJE51)ptfcSqqlqedUs9fis#_kTDe`%NM`&#ZKef-)*G)?WV5 z*Z8d8B|yRgaS0F1i}i1C}^bDWiBH*@=ZN%LVsYY|-)6<@{Bx8ycmw8%h0bGyZ@j zi_2Au(bxKNbmH%y9X%g3C3^i)A^Vl$!~?8=KM*R1Mf(fPO8ZPM((0e7$r!HX2cJ2mQ&)?h z=cu#U1u!l377iyQRfVt);ws&Y9A*vG8S6D>6r!>_MgG_ZnKm;mhH~1N{^11H0BP3U`Pv>T!9DBOM_BFC(TXU1XR0U%YzNuti|xUknq zC`M2K<}MSVD`>E3=BuBPY(SWWA;qH!*+D*Xy7jP|{=})Tdqd}{=gEZ2&d9_fRn-H; z?bt(zaXZnfpY2?r^idCII67EAWu~HWX%?xI=I^tGf%N9MBWRP-qAV&%l!7*Wz@c$M#MvSdx{5_;(A} zvn;%Sr&zLeh7V%a@RP8nez`@8&;hAreYkvkMelSGjw*54*%glZh6$M~oKM%Mp$dWC zA7CgXpBnrL2b;gq^>_#Ojt5f1ZM8EHBWa=|=Q*&!n zGVA4}_rh%f5I=%I6_`R0oAYP|QDkOX#b=5BTU?X(y(KGXaw|(p;`aQW^`Q5V6W#$F3WD0WS8Cgrs`Ad-ybz3>%*Ft|t6mb|&H;+ub!Q7r z_EKjXElwuIViZ(42mF5{Z<=H-|NgUqG)1jYjf_jX&@!wbq|*#fRD9soKPo|>%7SA4 z>FGeYga6ay#VUKZWCL4aad|3Yir?{HSiI-Ulp{&2{(mx45O?!xW2P-|NU;|hN=mF( z6@SHgFFkfih6g3K0T}IV_%}Z(cH0A#@^D{6czAbCjMAoK@lqz&1eZgs2aS$Wwj8-et9!e_(vl@~Q<<+Bs8DYe4h*9PEA8 zPj;w1t0%gFMp?a7^T+=4HRMkgP*MeZ)R1kG)AIAlIftcc<-gyWFxKoNTNYIkDEt`x z)@Rtf^?e9=ksm%N0lWUWtnFK$yTS7cr6f9_KZc(sP^glX7M@Uaf2jD*kMK+0M&*{nFq2j7k5$ z56%;zZd3i0a);I`xA1iSa%VmsRE1_D>@+0$tNj_0DLsA=p87!g4qIxfo`EUI9U*z( z8yE!vtl)1D00JN8xHbsvE3y{Zuzu(bP%8Yk<35V7D@(cmt2aHk4xiO5!2IybQ`s*f zh5t1$48y8D<>T&K!`(LHpK;K385GO;q(nh z#ReZl2}n+SxvujELJyWIZt1VsP)O4mL3CW#fFBtPy3NE9)WQ8j$S6m^j%Sh~Ra}IE z)wi4&iJ}z-^9x>3O9xAk9gxO#fpox%AxGT-nHzG?lco$?{r2HI4Zb>`*Gv7Z4OAW^ z{zc&e$sPnl1DIjQL9RA3a*PAy{^)6S53N@Qm&FGfgNw7TZS@it@EAj4tWp?w-Y+b(+q=Fb#hx==!I0w%Pik zO*RB1)PGM0&-C8x{gtA-{25$Mz_S6ISbhhLvqpF+?(0W-)#5cIzF zNUFfjI1Pwtb{=om7X40Czwd_b?x`SxGX+~a;93I%Ce{Tc? zT5<=7OiH*xKU%V`Rsm{bgoV&`qV^;{6Jm`B8M<`9&*z~)&K#bS$M5OLV$SQ`0gzQQ z@Qg3-abqRWN>Z&OtjG4pKpr445EvYjIoY-D0-kQCJYic?h_Jzks98~?5k?%sfeM0w zqTI$;j;P!|DhHsv_1I)FuO0J9Z&_+o7K`uPycdvj=JbMexy0v5v)XG52u?wFF|3AVtN;(_6$fr{xdACj$BjmiBJt$7s^R-m zYqk(bAHk?l({Ym`EP?-LcVXZ^I_QJj@FnH^lIdBZSsiHw?Qx3g*MHE+X?;-Cm-t7K z$FSrbLw_@cc*Q@NF7iB!*8=a0KWHz)gB6g9ynqnYp~t|~ql(2U_O+$9k|Y$C<#<;; zUnR@Zbw`KbYpT=|Zy>NNLyM8093`ZRY1DTNDHFMekXQ}5L;%_U)1cd*d}}n z91Py(z4waZL9EU`nD-fmBYGGU#B`#tNacP6I$<-B;l>efSPu_;j&{NBOsJ>lC0se_ z-xbi9M2#DbaChY2a&;L0f!ettP+GHYA?iIuNGByQ1KNxTJ_Ej__Q?)<+5Yh=9D~Tb zoUNzH-X6uTt0v0>j`)0M6juf{TkUI^MUgg1n9m>v#!=ijrN7F7GFkW{xzY43PQ=0j zzjn57)$|=K$Ux$+3zuB7ZkUe&t?RhZMK?y*Yyz2a-FLPZl#OHG^an|3?VzRV6TQ_^ zXhPk?PWHTIk^aBod2`05=jT;6BADTt0^ID8Z25lSNsfQZ{VY>@#}AP;ii27V2t4g- z(qszcV@gq|7IxByfnHn1g2Rj@Vxk;szn738M&UGbK`yXmM)U?H!$D-^7`wA(jB7m!WwN0QC@SAYRhG|H1u{QYbStG)p>8ha zDWk6<2~iX(Q+iv(L4C`4<@7fXQBBNlfshB2tZ&`p-XYyt2()m-zK46`wvZZf_|Q7R z10z;8ZH-tO-5}SJbqHFOJ9MIAkUEHX(urTno^m~t(5I05W(2ME&qewui(6g=cOKD_rZVHG+}!RG zto!^Rp!}@x0qYI7%SA&HE~e!E<%ie*kWv}v@l5`bv&gZW-M5DA#Yu9=Z7vT0TpR zna?1BRYNj?Y(|b65hNf~wJuH<)-S4+p=}qtbO;t(sXFN;>)#ig=}+tVuvQ?|LYL|CC7K%l0BdAUVj}%p46U#yHU(S%nPhf8j{%W z%J~+n8?;MO#I=vr$T+g$F>Evhl@JEZabnVpWT79A3AWUgigtpA%>yC&8dH2FFNr_qi{j+u}>m zJsFx{%vDF~n{-vk51~J(t*5K*K|7l`ZYiVuTA}9v1zQ`pZPEN|7y3;cXhS?p9x22( zz7ZuKVwQELBecih&dL%_Ho>6|NF1!+qYsL5o z@?8E+XY+0%rZk2aNeY^DkzLa-%dyRM&GbTbqBI=^TLB%DCy@fZf-ejRY+UJQl?7UU zbu!Em*RyYGt-vL$qBu6@{U^3by=ia! zzX3Z6`Q1y~mS?d$3seh*c$l=hpL>plfPVqaOpyT1MrrKi&q`cXl3Bc}LcH+rGNGs$ zNk$v)-v+x6!zLsn3v*gIjgbW3#^f1#zpF6yo@CqD;Y!nq8+v%|#^i_9az*BJ1QHC! zsow0AF_t;DdD`tetuYnuTBEcMO^=v~f1I9C%$Ey9aI^3Dr zE_)B2p4d~APUm15K>~;%2~@N6Fsm)hWBlhu5z1s_Lbi93A>v}zMOYX-V^_73McnPU zri+NKE|A#z=>=micfQ;ic-z!90D){`DOCfjoXnAuzMMBVh)JGF3iK=xRQ6Z=UZOwd zVsegV;f~0b{k{!01w9=jp2N&|4DvDEuVe$eGxbqFMGGz*MpL`iAPq3=jPoS<#Sa)( zH%Q8vNaWB9VCvAwm!N!4_1RLtw_@{#2|BI%i6Cw7J0PIP<{q~y*rT9M!o0UH52qsc z4~kZKQ8Qjtt2!F#;MTYi@OCI$q)FGEH(2d0bga}7wu|=UQ*X=cTJIr@sP{*!pQ95l zjOd#Y#KiuHS~CEx)vg6dn|SF|qDvb0tYTp%8S za||(qT(1^Uf^Mz~mp9Uba1`T>A`Rbjx-)dAj!kyUhnn4y&SK1y0tO1$WU1tg4)0*( z)X#uS*rfVGp{czZ#*d2dB(eYEg5167I1?as?P3c1H?VQ0z%Whp5LO*?xkFG5s9z^? zVLhBm`oJ$GRFWZD${`}uGVh6C~JCLeB*jRjB_>L$p!PE{1Fsk zJ@fM1hCs({N&`G*$}_TMLQ)dLdRL?R_arDqqTmDue4{A1B8-rz6`3r@fw$%(9~HI4 zsF3uZ$C3$)h4Z>8mDo!JkKXeQ$PiKA7d*My7wX_=p>-xQxloE(J`dYK@%K&HL5%Mt z1W?IG)XvQw`vNqxzS7d~IB{4~~kk;{FI_5ZQ;7EoEHQM<5#fJldcbcZ0_CEX1Yf;0jGQX-9XH`3i; z&>ZP?J#wk??J63%jST;FVZ!a|0-Ze){FXDX$8=J9{5-Ylvn+F2g+$4{m+3D=@zqYtDO?<*`)? zHc&LOXL8hp*+?<9A?hG?!pl{O$D8&4EnvtdFd8dY1r6nJmPoqhXw7Is{T`OJcHkcf z@i`k;WcyIS-E7K>D0PY8JyU%b^brxt%YDq{A)Os4Yf=J85N}9OV|z4MPD#cSKa7 zMd+!LiWB%Ce-C0FHqN+|PcFEAcB?&PtGi2m6`z_)tUp2z7(}=DqziO|;RFf7nL)zx zb;)YoA^f;JuaERoK-f75qOr{``qvSA*NB@6PNa1GZS&8cGdY9uOIx(M4XEWVe8Z&a7Ld8MQXJE=&%DAt7$;Tqr^sqc!p z{fbxZw5#U`YnXPPLl5Tu&OA@fU`?7P#_1#MP@&bQaSP4h{>C@zKZkC|J#YU~ZqIJ6 zXf}=sI~pa$(@=A(9&1ZI%&-F~lwN-5^ZcowpWi)xx$`y1z~v`flsq#b!NLA`4egX+ zt-PvZNDQHTpi?M0dSp^(@{#$hVw=rGqw_RQaU~UXBPHfc!;>oI&e(>m`^z4^!5s-s znS9Gd7BconUwHn?AooXdKASE$q{vc6JbM-ctz-I~(qCTTO|*fZ2Q_|iIH(lIV^Jsk$BZMX>EuBelxD`b1v);~syl1J-zhO-T5j~}wm@v3C? zUDr6FwJaQPT6upHC+eS5{6m1ntFSZ>By27ul1L%UE*hAm%wH)cGaozeo@R5k&NQJA z{RtzLzPbMEu=K2_L!^i_6_Q6@&JMiYp)o2vN8fc30OvNtm-80woK{LtXxL`Mm_GuJ z@SkQDn=k#DukW=QRo+|d*3%Pk4gu|R)11LwJ&=D!UrWt8yWlmc@UO!tZlxmRE|SLR z4^t@QZpQE=>KK0m?K30VmYqT#RgN0!5zrfHHlkjg5=CpWw#D4*v^~ll(%(0xL0oAuGH@vYKjS zx8=%*ch2t9q!LD`(h8{uy5j({&BUZ3s3T_{+Ed}2?##XfqXo)J#%|)V=dS$y*zz*9 zsKRBx0mv(P2M`-+gpUljKF6>e#}WB?oUbLVth&H>baf8y5YdQE?qtU$BC;;sI+1By zYmwN6h8m9n%o$bzS*s~r%OE3RNB4Z2^3gF3@5AZ_s+Lg z!Dv$}AFm((_+i7CA&V-V*chLX8qHhr3Cz`d^nrPq=Y8&W7Q;%Z1>9Rd#*4K!$RoOfh0Z}xsTN6O zOfgd@Rk{95UkAO`a&r{5f+7kQ;=tFGGTK|Qaf~vF#XGr`+bh_Z=)ckCQ&uGl95GY1 zF$<8lV|;!mXMPnSxJ_llIg3=GIl!H<_IP~yvtNFK;&0j=RLrM$19pp?A}fQ2aGD9= zJC+(YZM%jybMi|vLh{#_RNoEfJ?qeuC$~)rOo{S>v|d);rjin+KAJ4Eec;DC8W>9L z6B^Ku5@pU;b@>PB(se^`A}l6rxVxhU?G|ORjr%+{k>t?(X@Fz#CbRdKvPlb?>FUpV zD5+1MF<_+ji0RO?Si4me>ebx~YH?my5gzp8W>1t;eX$jLm2YGo)A}B?%2Cv^Lmx77 zF#OrOanbfhsBW7)^HDi_gm}7oRZt%yblz^p06T+W?YkXwPhhn^`MrnrJDlKt%3G|R zD;N@$9s-zyNGS!aoe1FRKWPj6%J1JqM`bw3Q+g=K`t(k`;q|&Z=SVSC+xMBI5;T%1 zmCKAZ+x*142sGv~2izMOUKBDX(a9MN6M6M(Ntvi9{J@TS@O^7|fV`$Az4XPVkz!0j zP@P5h1G1>o6oV3Ag_HR}xo$ONTfBy^l2=W({$b{%mEAJ=EE(%%(85;d%s%gxu4xM1 zlECU?#K~YTA4e^n60m0EZd&%kcjQLfEI92zx;%sFy+?;+Ex?bKYNmT_-+#SJqf~?L zC|8jyFEQ2*0UKi7z#2+w@IfvNoTHlw&7rP!TWr0~rd)zIWv7r{9h;?`(RJkW!8*yv zox4s1hk3wx9}ArzxT@%aXTgC=O4`?|HbmHg(YfdIlWb!%QiU{A1iSrp6|# z+kd=(N`V{Ac|`G3wLzJQHD=ZT4{oD3|ixhvLv$;GQ@dYh@j6C7TKS)?GlKwN1 zeR%|Kio>Z~A-+}hcC#{^spXH!3sO-iXAnyH5uIwB`bqk(g@$TCU_Zvare$asDz(!t(-ODN9~w0) zcv9^pFQN_I(sKaXu|$s4_FSyQF5C7lKBiSS&8&fPME2Uxxeo~m%Sdae+eSE~L9sIT ztFq16DCV6j9PX`4_a!u0h=q9i2$Fe14;1vER#yANf&7k3@fx;@c+n>~ipRJbPKp@Q zEED=u;#{f%F{_Yj&)3<(V80@pO1)Tx?4OI_3&z+a@KyR{K6xB(Tc?Sq6d*9xE2Vnt ziC|w}oW_fZIl$7JC6+mR<{@2+nz*XD6OqshyueFP;1Jx zC9ekCFDS0|DLS#P z&Reb^19k$sxYRg&;|J*<+~QkXeovLp?HGdINfm@$YRfg0+ageAmTFwM5FSlwUqAm= zo6&o%m^xam$;S`>5c&15vMD(m-A2vaq&nqBvDYH{a)MIKSjuGf1U(K+Z_tU@7vF!}rIx;c{w-<{ zbpF`&9DM9IS*i*mW0Kcz&s(w_-~(6l;+<}#|9@^A5=&4T(HY+Gb}rSeT!x_fALe@i zjiy%Dg;YTApE36n#PEal;4X%+tD08?2(F$%VdI}0bmjSI&BiQrljQsk#z4)a^@J?& zN+?LP`5jGR$P3*&KWK`|egO{Q%BKmJyIL=d7Wh4m7%5;^0mp{DpbGI_3f?+;e~;>b z%>y+F@nqaDsB~@fE!T(ALx{n=h2d-g1}9&m6wQM{o8=8%;f-5pkSV+afOpL)4NUGF zU@!%D@)@{fwsymjW#qLl&DjTv`jz|R-l$116FnnBROY>82SwLZR^U&-f>8DV>I@T3jwjakVp{x_v1bglqKhw`V7Kl33mnVzayl^TKY&3_lN zMgA?P93NBuk1@)BqBZLKN4@w^)zbYHmcvc#I1sn(KJw3J{O2!*K8{@ZKZeb)B<5^r zoAHJx{yH%bZO|jWV^v!1maP97>OM}~J1YF2pZ+)FMSQ(~d{89FQHqE6>&KoyWRdY!C43mYFjhl`}2g zIB9wIcYMBr*Zk*X7MxzwFjhX_FK=2tG5X+S0d~f{yyv0VJD{t?(+8D%3WVq`&xne` z;1V#&rti^0Kw0UgLO3?e*1hw70k#gn$|U9a1xhhQUIcJP>aHNuLdxsw3GAvJscjSA zij?(;S&%bA3Tnc}78qW!=~hry5(JhZ&`+4>jjkXLFGOg^*;nYmN>NE_1S!T^xpU!W z$SRiu1EFCV7-l1QHE+zJF@+KMcLVrWo7V5=fuTw&CyL7@!ghN|-lXap34gh_*G6s# z2&+4`uW7Ra;6($V;&+Q%zhik3+gJbEa~Ng9)Dn6ZUk7F?qYAk2SbTSCzc`e>G}Emz z?}I??ZyrD1rL3k_6A3ucI+GqHXlM?HCb1!_C=S-41oHV`yv8F0Hwta{ya=%9MQ_KQDKggraiLE9-po7yVcar_=drCd&biO~dLR@fz*PoiYZr=7J`#l1 zBzf||@22>e^>s0v8o3FWXwZrbz*13bf%B8*g{>$5ts8EzkyNhbFQ}IlRE5r%%QV|zd)2rdml+-B)~F-M%P2x6t~kJ923w&`lLW;W2oY*27?2 z_yZb$&&%ZtkQs=8L6H)z00TJd#4?d&SPu8#3Qn?WP$~~?EJwO-LGfZrl{^BBgaC$R zG{b)>0S%$-w?m+fKzVvFg$O)!gMp-lhAREt2y&gV%+<4J)DEJDvV)guxym}J`{=wY z4~oXAkx5!4-qR3G!Cc40oSwIH;LQfp=s#E32ej+I0d2m7QYgK}_2n~CwObd`JJ{`2 z;_(yS+F;Ip31tU~p(C8&66Sd(M=|T=+pBD*0lg`xDOOqKpijm>ERZ^x3_htgCM5fD zR>rS=c0<%QN9@xyw)tT_d`Nq&C80Dtzm-QkkNuNHI{)N$06-g_DYanksJ1UAm?X}(iXf; z)suTc4b~U8@rW3#uxuWpQW?IrM4Qk>@&#v>4dt>b%zHwvEEG7_jCYZ-mPaE{im3A{ zq8=GDtXsGucLk+LspqpZNq)2<0Twos5wvB6Q&7rLo_4F7f-7#G6O7 zLnD})+dG_-P#WGx7R`gumJR2?^+O{PY)K{%s+zR%##+MPh8{{1Ni8gimu;Zy$C!VC|P?`fU$qT z{NL@xyppMOu%En>a^FmOKi*pW8s*NYCsMxaQ~I)PSa_Wqfz@8LB*B-JBvwo@_h=&; z28*FwNP17}POx4eHHGx21Yhg!l29?DLBk%%Xt9}HJ5fx6$7Nb_KQDjVR&b9#_PTv< zZbWuC!iw)xR5#_ZGHHyt1k$bxhKXeR(BaP-Qm}^B6LNYjuiA<1TlxVQ*Po9=y#}H@ee_>z zrdTa8#;3{&xlmFkEScOv8D-t4AV-Fpq%Kj&hV;WR!dGHLe)|gA#J)V5aO_GYN!`zc zaba(mjc-1e#MV8V65l=24Llld|M>r=>-ufuS_MCs2?oc2MW4=Nf2! zzI#OCnV~PqH7k6_U8R$p%q9eJwRuNKxiFYsGozLGVi`enRfC$q&%R-fI|&XhMW1r% zki#5o)-)xAHieLRi;XcOmO|P)4Gq#8ZdIQ>>x%b?A7IyI@i4HM(W7zjy|R(GUxgB-prxF&R$83JX)*yu2>5L3Y`D?+YTo93YLSk^ifR!`)K`*o z&uzjtc-4{exh4y&x3qF(*E{)yCRimX|s}$@d3EjLm^0CYJ6_z^|@jg^{vZ{1D36A|9Uc1LaH*9++N?LGS zCShZ{{;3DoyfIB@64A7F>t%tfrSl?G%gecv&V1KxBh2N_qB*cN%>B<0#T zqS9bw4#rv<%v3K+sMKMQrW9Ut6(K>w2$MH>XYferA^W3*VI{g_^Ae?_hW@H*s~fDf z#M~peipkaz)_F)A;MBJ5%&l$ zABL=9lpo>7lY<0aTC=f0FX`*eHmj1PVlbVHFHsfV4-{z()BUV%mBxktHSd8Mekfk_ z@kNLnLoIf$TyF$rz1p-Q${OFmUa=LNyPD)to6Lhl!32u+b zh$>-w?X{t7T>q*936_(q-o5sSD5hdMw8dwlPi(6q&y}r~%r#$~o;L`+nD6ux!I-@x z%oV8@x#;q6Ijkf#GmLNlD{;i{hBDi&KyLn0VR}rt)7-;8-r}uqw(O9KLQkV6l@YN( z_3_z`{~~EP7k~S(m47vBGjau0KEFwdxH&?XvAvURkHV z7^lMh*Ox^vAsD$o91P>9nXRa`9*?Eb?M54YM0ssRFeaf8>w+ynylghk52bx0t8g9T zXVW9-9CHc!PLZ=)ZH-d-X`5w_sr1JBl0+4nx{^nIA^8L7uQIm*{pZ?mw!jQa)lfkT zp?TF;w}kEVGH@Px6lpQaNC7iBL(2Ibff0Kwj#Fqy)z4`^orPBLITGy)GsIh4r9aK~ z{(MBx#<5QKeapP~rgr4hEUyE3rS^me$H{gqsljUXAw=nWa!Q{}h3m$0X+POvQH%Ya z>YR-H)9dp%Uxoa&-nFB5nQs88+d6Fr+1Xiqn`RV|)+rQDuoRXzq)t^s z=BcX&29Zk5tC5jQT0haTBupA}{vinjgS-0vZjoa~N3YVVd7Okg zptF*RMUc$LrptsI+5PpOF$hXD(|_J6;Bi#)?zz{GclEa7`RgbRRyu*CTR3r&8idy+ zPhO8^GtM3UOgg#$qEWjrALlq80n}-|mho&gBtfx+>Y2EJc*fvHNzt^%`gQLs|He2LU z6E9o9vVzUiL2cakPHT=S?@0NSw>R`-RuX*bs~NDeo@!B4^QPFC z5(yCpdUXZ1Lrc3X{47)4g2wNDga9RT&G9sELKh2G{;lT)2j&&J7mly-FX~)(^y$}t zu+snY8fHN%P(CC10~KFua-sB;!(>k=o|pFd-{jG_;>zO@RH|Yh5udTZO*=0fED@4V~x0y-(ZINkOZ#+_dXtDzONj2T+SWhhd$Fu zcHeSd`j{@kMXDwWNm4Rf6L$-6#<{07Y@{foYCn>ST-h%m;XCn+Qni zQVf(_zz0ayDvaHiY@=SX1j=y4Xh-P+jm0P${vDneGNGij9e4et(H|4VBY+N$I-S@s zrWuzZjJ@ReGvqnqGf;`xLX2G;?;;7m=Gp?bf-Tm>$;H!WG#)_UwZ`(YeAtL0UR=c` zI_M#MJgFI37$bI>a*wEzgHVq)=mUXgIFajD^7R#P=XAT|42Nca_AU0GE*?|9JT4FU zKubNbwYY1LP5I!{tDcg!s&72r4!3TVh`nZz>@tmhQ?PgF|BYzDHQ`nO)c_BfdAc=Q zu^IlpP(lrrd%_Lt`6{BoC6FaMY7`$orD@9?X%W$eyB=6(JXNOfGMbPNZ>%qNQMrf zflo`wf%7%PgU}p9j&Fse!V$H6=B$^FrzEm&oVtUGPYvjTzG2HqTm+HxYU9kul3+|c zk^jlJ@N$td!D?D#aebE5#~t&C$Kqcqusy*Xmo4sx4u+}v8O&to4BIzGBO|m7Wkpu= za&LV#C(DzyW02%^(C+Sob2E#){?rSFAyfySvcifWuXvx={lhg4msFo1WX$OUs`csJ zLdw$kH=AWfBc~eU;zXq6I9cdXdB46hGvTyQ$vbX+QJjx$3P!+)V2hRg6YY&I$B(D9 ze{~3Z$AkdBY9(RS;Yh5!?3DlqqR=yhA<^0=ov-1)F5*v)FXIv+t@&TLFx2L3i6Bs> zI)tk)A*=o*3^Le8B%Pd~djnE|5uE)Zj?ebn@365)ezMK=qjCxajQPL7@bC1izG7!9 zcp441f0YVMx_j#cUSOP(&25d_Uk7t*n3*tZ7NH9vyqjQNYCl_t@bW^yV$j%vg@PFD z6=)|8cA#IMM`SaxK5k6w8;GJ1Ylb;B41R=wi4SN`v>d$%OpT&JpF&AfH!f7CcI($8{`8AQbcaXSAhqv|T+y?_maa9z5WtAMZZ`;o}rA zrrBX=YT|x$1Osf!p*#xqL!CD(&Eb-wB_ZLqid6{Sfsl{X8#ed#YZ$vK`rX4Gv18yk zxeeOrywjH^c1i)%b7A9Vlhm@_U!Z-?dyGmjnN0xCef~B;iG* zOT#U#y!D9^{FK|8fTEVR1AbEMB~~=Y6DP(TB)km~feU(R%VHWy+6xxva*WEl+ zIBG(ygiI^Xjtv(64qOW~EOAfkoWb-45k7ij6Q&GsMgq+FeLBqNq3p~OpjgHgmXnD1 z>(N0dMy0)}8tGLsLWv|Xscf;QvwX4E!TmqB2OQ7}k!$whiA}3&%bA`$)`nz7Sg=k| zg9RMZ^o|LHQcK-gh3qx|h3fL@55{f&aCpM&O`~@}!&d~Vz7@_l>JqqHGB(12zp0L% zYrjU7CF1M&Rxfn9Ot+HyfX(p}-`WuH&&1S%XONCeOjiNmB?s_g8RMtPwY$qo>vV5l zVDfR?t=5>rCprG;&oLx6Mu2qhQ9{1o9h4&_D&3BppjqaXMG$@VU~;9{8v{>g>LW3wC3X@j z`M@z5jG9^y-27FixTofWv3F5*Ir9fLIUP z(H!xtD+6j=7prs-=fzj$AHZxP{ZHuKDp%WBUa69tU9}2)dfA?=_MnbRIwSR0E;Z}- zl@w{rxHg4`&jG&M!?}HgC?1m``dXX>Mg*-! z69^`G_}`>yALbXKw&!}ke@=G6@;5v6in6~Rqu|EYExn*-X7xOzGkNaY0vrix4@`*s zRzt3bDbm&1jrWo-4DfC(1Ky(*At$rs)@(&Z-1{Nc71VPgX{T3_VTl%C&k|(Ts7pr|!g&x}TSdVvdufW06wiJfdBT+Q2 zfkYc5kfFrF%x8VyfxlR$r@Qnnj~p5yUAGi6xuo3FasjwI?^pC3CLEsNT$ksgV-2%; z!3S#M-*I6Cf^k0LA33#`6zD~zQ={qGqH4L_TYp=L{f7krX}NAv;H&4DD>5PGqBb(o z?ZsC|628Ry`wbVJ-N7E4O))^j@yQ$AJ{4nr~}LSR&MsetX6-)^(%NV3Q-ez$h^ z;-*qZh;hF$$Zw$&ETUC*etA|T_+rpzGXlKp6LudCkBP&PO(k1c#--v+%}#+lBxj>B z&RL+n!ym7OWBrmgO9wRabE0qP|zlD$}xhU=V98A0jWW^Q!l^+PXGX3n7Vv)-T4h@)nQzXNy)XdN?UHf?Ohn`LD1xjfrs%Zu10Z# zv}S|yI1+HOL>U!Zh{_M?ZDCnQg{!;?R-X@8V&14jtgw5l+CQPCf6hxz9tXGxzmtO3M4iN%*_7 zVEhT4rNN^pj4EFs@-rw#-U~BgXnX_A0BGwF8vcVYjFFbJgce|WNQzUv$2QvyGa57Q z0C6WoLMzugohE zARF%4LDlbEhfs@>5RML}k}WXxs3Z6)4u3i%2>sf}8Ggf`9Q$nzX&h!UaPjsDf0T95 z6Ny{^d?#Tblj~{pEX6&Qj90aGA{ejtKUlUb#o$btWv-D}6 zYcF5Xx$C3B)-0H{Cy+^Zxw?RkQ}%9T^wFk9?Px_hEt4WG`s6)D~ps)y-mp3uAx$7fnD zycuRy7T)`l%Ev0yb5y5HfrW6Zi(aL+l$6L$etc~)m4%MR3b;x0I9N}3e)OK{4T7nMj)hi-�FwmY**!dCPTje z5ENFhsZ|%J?g-xdrRR=76Q>gtw!YW}qyR~Zjs#cytbMVq-s(gK&ApZ{j z!G~dmDjmDLn~=>z=ZKr)7#yCg^!py;xNV6MoA=K`=4_i>A1mX6DlY99u&h)4%SynW zS%d%%*mbg&!hqWAYcdD+Iv40}yfp%<6`X7h8~Xy$;3eU|LuPa)S|l zZVeHp06twu($^+A@5IXpFnSdpzFf1_#=!2 z%ctl|({}swVc^6;6DUXLlJWAR#zxEKj}~Dnsms7`ZPe1?Zt&eWMS$He)8_Y6m|N(8 z{yOyL7l1oKS`M8XpVjEA7~tVug1Jl`WLSg#`_Y?6Q6eRws-kD+P`d#IBm;Qkk;Gj6 zNv!EdVH5I*v=}&fryIbNvnjm|W~3aKP?Z5oDKEJmBE*S`plP}H>=P;V%2m@(42e*9 zj8GJof(YhGU8^6Yc^T)7k3$LuLh-!{i%74kfWZlKtsTMehhIW?274I*cnLn55T*0O zA_5-OQ*(1Q5-}dAQU@2FOZOK1Fo7Nnis$Cbf!HsER}2+1B5eTVC!d5z z05ja1g0uZo2F=Qq*Gkm3AKE=&LulRxIX#%%?|~>ropR$%I{%I5@*uhyZs;#9L^4<2 z-7}fJTrfyzKu#q-vL|Y3+CKft^D}$l{0-z(oe?1xIdyWMD{@MH^Vu57BqGZLt}5m6 zZ6Hz8-V6w|0;y51L=fDrUhwk40U*~8+N`Y9)H4V$M~Kj&v|f=1xX_HPrt@0f2y`?L zAV@reWGbGK-b~4+_i&4&_kXf03;W<$MDh+6pn{}H?(R&d5+%7o2FEiDY-ZDYyZ1IEOLA=HI@wVJ(bfL zd6*5GoE*L`d>xEVTxB~`1xqxSI6f_T<0^+wL(ksO8R$xosQ}7^)O!^buu0{6VtDXE zxU`@j>|nV~2cFjtGZAUs7>G9x)6Rz&_-ia$av?x~y7wF?f?bx{!`Wh2h`@Ak@b=tr z8E=`CL7r~Bg!?&Cgk+F5g!n!EVrj+`%WFtGx#zCCb7w#t(G-wGWdNF7$XyP5NBmn0 z-lv8hq|Zm0B3*49p4*6kyF3Q^VE);pTIG<74)fihHbS0C`5g{$w)5!ATP51 z(;jAd=AZ`=27~Oa8wy*MP29;-FiC(7$cm2nd5}l$(2>U7vzy^K{i6oYb;ZG*NKzHQ z2?xw1{+OjJ;AJIN>;6n&kljpuToP61%x~ED^OfNwY46gs(g@(^+#QUovr|gc>cZiqO}cQpP6l167ub{3;h|D9&n?hbuB&ra()g``OiBD< zpUMrR6TBVZex~aZvxeBBKCp1%?4ZtlOA$U z^h5qY1%HY6U`sDY_Ke?Sp(dd^JMG;xF~xbxWRuht%BQ$~ryprQTduM+&2H{?nN2U! zb)?Dfrg3_i?~N*N&}lI``N!x6v8>OyWeM|A0qc<`O7KIo*$`%JYIEC$(jf^bEaG5RsqW%HvP0MCyR*WBJ}MbGlo8=ZV$t#CUYi zYClm+&lhlN%+0zm{noCOy2?<4EUY%#)JCCr~&Sy%^*{ zzsKFH7eNPPL7Ah*GOaboaMUZ=$I-iR39;W?JOm=(SjZC@>xSZdzlqfC0&=H!wloE) z25#Vz9Y-C>SY21Bcxt@AAgbClE5c}=f6p40eqSi16{_{=8ME3dqhs&`*DjE~)cjH)e zA?@u%xw%|@hx|V*pyP18c=Td-wm^BYY{>=M7*jFHVcd6a0f{X0vOgD}it3A?OFXbU zoC46up;kNeGZ`>LBufBo&1%{6!x(54+PIT8NZ0*sagxX^a`^b-7@z)FfUxWw&h*-@ zTioHqNP&es{Yx^2@b&}Fak`q@xtJ8yQbQi)(AiN~)RN|z2sP_{eWe`uE!(P8*&!XtIA zmaZ~N>~cS*&M&CQr_G#|PW@gM+px$LM@xo33wIcQvjm;TrK#44k@28WJvq_Y5)!-N z9)K4bS#Qaf@%{u;atEjv_nvpUQdJ|^FJG-a=S;Ouud!=B`^>FK_Ax^McYwEnG4>CX ziZwCQt*=a`k-qFNQ!~q&a=5XisuFU!2qbyfQgV=Er_wflnqI`7vj|T+L>@`0xsA$e zNr7OY7<5)t%HQ`IF1RU?cs=F~1T6|!ayL{>OO~5}PsvscSa0cN(snQ{4qFt52Bg#H zm$QDi$^3zP%-dKZY}#5}hJ9U0)I#)e7;4ouhhU8F6Xc&?WY!sC z{pC>2DQzdUAQB9WjxXl!^@q$cUC*-^oEwS?mjAdI%t}SCQNPWR_h5}HWG5jXP z%>eKAXQ_H6?z9?ob}ExFQ=Kay4od_^S)LE0R4UkfwKn!-*IoV;QJ0kR=Y2tK=-PDN zs+5s?vzmBoLW;CoPTVvC$}MxzT$Z0Ncr`0$@dODcDFhu;-`=Coo7Q@5>-LnvT+ewS zMJcI;TzobLGSLA#n9KgSp(9yB0L2{7^~iRqvz(Cp^srb<4f>i1nW~SaLj1Kj+(Mh* zlLx7GcQqeBCBbcNK<%)iw3ZLXewUxBNxz4ADjbN};*hN~i+cP*7+^bTs@WyV!ru z{CS^MUP!fRS1B(qT&qpwMVal+(@5?CG?6bn^KFb(LV@KIbw9+RKeAWmS$4Z=!%)BpTFMjlp3ecT4Cx>C$~#v^5jv;|ZZ6 z&-@`pZ3gT2T1m1^0jE^ii&>p6Z&n3hbJ_k#s7!JmYXMy7=z`!2qoDp0QiaGCI+vV6 zzKjGHVWbV(C}ELOmBDKT279n`5V)00v8J1-nuPMzyGaEZp$6KQEQ!R%KnRZO#3NBey(}Uc=#YfM?QuS)P((Bx8Ah z1=T~NClt1k2>+|N=pup=Q_gIcsP&iFk4%)HHyl)Xz&+ev`1F{aIbKwqjbu7T1LzU9 z%tPGk$HEL#!Ghg~H&@Tz2s@aK*IpAJJ*-I+wFu<8W$b=QTF)x_K0iAh~^BSS!l3!u0 zM*b|ULVyWF9$!uzW^LUDH?0K=a^_>LEBV_*wl<*QLLi}lW8h+SrlL|cuR7SuVA0Iy z4@Ke>4N3j=>yibYrY`mPmAph^&ktSW5>^`4yOH{6dM3^v+Lxk_^Ae`p5Wz~XZ0s6v zofn|lU^JglenP`;waWDvAJn8q;EcoiglrAN7TP3hRCP`x5#U|Ze*&hz_i8`E zpv=>}4lsE$4XZ`9B4m|z)*u<<{hT&O=g=cPD3#N>t?~sMgmv|^;__Vaxg#MHX52MV080eheMu7Yign)Wv z^E|t2lp9jr6hex{m0@+S{{qYRmt>hKdKXMIOr{`enD}szY;^C(VAZ(NMeu2gyva$R z0B8D}aNe*xZI6^1h!ap}8))S@tFysz`$^i)lPi+6y!+U`<0`0eUwR=~tF(&?s^zM{ zlCTxKak^33&uTB9yf?;5RQP?ax*;D*%(W-tyoRnEVv^WVMVJ^jXGVD5_X=!e}t`K*yEPK5K#l?wlV^UAxqu3gBWp{@MgK~mc{>b0o z6x4fPZmRm`Is1aU9||E&pna#Z%|olZG?==f?qSWQR!b+L#H4Em*s%rJc;86V`#W$9 zt%3X>_Nd@kmwvl5WX7stoh_(!_*XJ{KsbHphxcq}D~n`x8EMxO+)@iT!~Xc54H%_h zxI=aO$*oTP>P3-n>gw%JmqWe$Zn1F&trS1xo?QM+%f@*0xBC?HyC+X4YPQh-%=~d1 zSc509+;oxntYt%Mh!Hj@r~g{SL}so7r#;bg-3w+|>b6p)ckj^HF(!Zq+?8IyvIEDuGMdsFmUDhH|aqx&Qn zeFu~BkJBa#0NfrIS9<>8MsqjwE&|@dA0%V!h6<`FnSorfS)Ktw;?jssQLP6{>fJ3*I@M%b=Wgz^1XdD zLUBVer~LG~3w-r|+9av0yjC&03!2S0h!F9Af6bohuO}4ziO^Yp-~MYT^o%w)U|Z|(t|JE)@2uT)?k{kxO$)H1uq-tv*163~ucx@9bAOS`6N7;qNGhQGM@G|ge$S9ydfQR_#KoLkP zn?N;$o9o>)pj>@cae>w_n^!Zrix62OC^w}L@>30qk%%3HeZb-?1)vP7|l=#k&j!He>%BmL?-AGnz#sG|J5n>H4y(-cUWW2y6nTm$@hHrThW#QX>=Um)vE?d zx@wZZYPs{P{P`J#e5G+)`zz99{LJV>eqTh8vU2u8Z8m0h(`ZYH6dB~tJXSPs;Y};#(v+$B*1EI!@&HT82om1d77I|^Hst$yDpLSanhY63Jh1D!y!IE z&^>{|D+*yozX%P>${LFHT7msym1Afj5CJYWaV=EOaJU?E|EU<>wtq4D)qLLXIpg2p zI+(%%?KfQoP2hZ`8OlEARtRWFYQnhA$h5XY{~s3M_x6pS8HM+eIOE;iFW{C2e$Ds< z_q3~Pf{m8xl+)dU8~1KfiAP3fQ7Q0Bw=soA3f!_;0xsHi{YQDG$e;{F%u_Gb;KPc- zgAWlu9r>`<<3qXM*axWU+}uuo!W<`5@C^`sVOxT_{H41*Kt2i_XL!@ zjx8m>$*shYmu(m6-2>{70=F;5`j zlfZeTνa?D1k@9Nwr-dK(FVER8b`OD`(6M!8b^6qdnAWC~U&lwF-4H?VJ5(e{9m z!LMh;}V zOYZ=H|HoJwVrhYbtZcGB5tC2xLy631LY3=&}ki zS17!lC5AaR$o;ud$Xd3+OcO(&#u_E4@fGLf!(4rH&*tuFORrr0GM5jJSBm{0+r+(v z?};+|I|y8z&|H=n146A z_Wh^)x^{lIMprsMw5GBbo4WTaBX4bb)=eMRlYPo5BC|m3ThR=)lw^^sKF1_`vhJEV z->?PW;e9c_ak%SDS&ZVItQfuOzo!HD;8^PR`1glbEm2xLCvUu@>R)~_;Ofs4NcPr5 ziwu8yeLy66oRaii(GG8!x(RG%MLx|@Es@i12Mepu@~TY}OzkM8)7<1mkzH1erUvsZ zjM<^FQFy~!bS4#joEI9MpFF+4n=oGFRLx`w$N15czCbkZb-8zKx}Lf-wL)nBDkdmy zDerTrT%qnAT?)QivqIg=ZLT|Y6l;5yTDRHmeX9m% zPW_-KN^gb9=x?N0Q13YVc-qV<7#+l*$h07=puxmLMmnX^sL6E=FyP##oljEY;k)1B zZ6X6KV^v~NXr6>XeUHgk>Pp6BsA5DX=BSmS*UKDwoo|7LGUd_xsT(e7TtH45=KJ4wVS;8@b_!vzhT3Rt`MHW}(*mLQ=s#p@A++Z=b~_LT=tmqcJop9|o)P-PIVwgI zEZwUgePm^NjEY08+C%VER{G;s1T;Sjc~Upn?r|1_yfLSfcsfUX<1*PZ)^>KhksT(^ zF^?yB$Gb^h;ASR^((1_3;PzQ|lHDsB^9D@>hoT%KjSjPn(x<7u?YE4+ zUzyH3d8|+A$Wa8NJT86wEW^Bq=w73MJ{;x@`!XfNH9b#xK;aX;{X6tr1}X84#8196 zxom{R=1-?zn;zJoRNBNt9FcKiNLiJZa=x9aej*;?BV8ONRH}S#T)|2~ICi4=PkI1P z^;|+0%>#CwEtuQ0t5`}WX(HysrGb0FCSjWO@bo^1C-Uy01GI!m42bj?dD8?y$=##M2jdTqClN`qYRv!#t6YS zMDS^>Z#mych5#leKuC#fj_B6l86oy3^sb#?vLcO1=t-WKb0XRgdwteQl(>9;R{e_j zO7`8@!|=VGUfAzN8q=8&NkY`$L0^MugDFGrU9oLDaDbo-B#BQ)a^Kow(iT|}A&?6# zbIeO%HU@W=*5-_0b47$c+e?;Moca2Fs?0|d1E@j5AyWa$3H$GO>4LlKzM!jI8ihG0wwp%SZXJhua13M&w{A;Z z0Q)s?w>S-aAovi>aqSX=qf*!!iSrvCeT+2-1VY@&j-jmKi^e1J=v-(=2qp+J2$~9e zm%>~T%oAEOEIMQtXx$8#P6%odkSQV9VUXUgZif4u^M{@Sc^vAn{jE@eC?lk|U@aKF z3*5=igow!4#j@(#Tk^6JAZnDL<-$XmbYW$bmG3g}lSN8u=cs0^DLspsGv(ZZ*i5&ht)vEExudd7bO{s=!V=xfET;+*dK zK>KNsaLaZ_NZ z9Esyp*Asp-uZ*Q12pH>2DA7&2f*;9;QNKH0c8o4*6O z2{bB-l8iGR0F$ZX1x~650?S8bRs9PJk03giTKgkQ6$lq=wRXTuDR z>X=hgNFn1l=mO7*0E9$9ADnJc8dH^1_@u~{O2Z^ahc$BL6JiBDMX%qWTZOr}V|>$K z5Stp^i&%_SrV-tzHqKHUxhIyY|6%L=qakHfk>R>&ACp^1-&~x8;8-ZQ$0}xJRQ}nM zS{JK^I0s|9m>UwqwWVJ^MEh04CXM)rw&6YFN6ImNlYaJBKZ@Vihs#Y!hCKgQ;S+*d zE%i-kf%UxP9zOJzHj_d)+nAb2-*%g%WpR0Qnu0x8&4XVT07kNDS%(bFBKMT950Su? zjMi4E9r^A?8pFiR;0H*T#|x$Z13OXC>SC&k>YVRfF!&dG2_LMbm-wdge@SeS@I812 zwo0@s|7!FAs#$Ni2MHn|Gm0_;6F29AzyFxheUz!)dd-j%OU!}5P9bpPALh|3)g z`+)o*NMyUcS^&vQK(br|=A!K2c9AuyDWtN@b5xbP{fo(jZv!!a*4{tw)43CkrQl znt;1d6);u5pAVM#gR#^<#^rr)2V_7(S1ZJ5+28>drqPiFLz27|Ad|DZ|6t zZ2+<~PJQru67*bQWH2c|Idkd9<*yY!t&bobYT)_(AJ}4YTSQmmO736ctPsNQs`?Z- z6+36=wNTt*cy@qI$9xPm;5nSP0qg6oggsN<^!Xbt@azx;cd@sI0t+GFmc^j*0@zgB z38LS?TNzgy;dc)VSsf@U@TSTh!j!jPFl+S$egt?&Ik`SyH5B#W z+KOR4Lhd;*p*1 z4s-l94U{E*h--nXN(8qX4s*gYcP+p*2^cRepgU3$lo)&~F8d!A0D}W)QbucxWWu~5 znq%&s6M$R!pP*3)`Z1}{Em3e)^aAy*MOZduk8tX}Ne}V@F%%p~A`E4DYMQ3y8B@xk z>$VurRiWJ8!+M$YO;hO;W<}-*JhDEeIWTpZVjkjF1fb0gY*C?U>*eHJ{MteU*p`xq zFzd8H%+mr9xF4Gf;Ih^V!)L``z<|qxHzBpzdpTMQiq1Gii*04}{ja(xl_%)o1pqAQS3qz*bgFh8MF zd1KhK2rQ-ed$;rZgOQxq`LAl89$i4d2ps+UtC2?$M}MNKA%xlQ{glUZvSq1K*Ya+B zovqYp5-{%x*TI%Gn}+^Il04KOEoVHyCS{@0JM-#xHbZGNbnTtN(fB^mFDBylCL4`d^CQ>zh6hy>FOQH?tW@3S z9Iqdv#)tj682?lEGPS4=9snK%9LVca>COh2b{lmth~2bJIEC!O#!raC=IT_+ak3x+ zb_Hp)wPBI__mJNeC7&v0nRR>Op5Qj&kaBlz;wHbhm$q=AHB07mEKCD_$@|HX4}u-#9xi`T42uHPAewN|ZWlWc7Kstc&=ERX$=ZFX>vD(pyAOs}t_u5F)H z^D;4bmlAb9Yl+6u(?b7QTMB2;%^I{Qc465~+?=G@qd)<>A*KYGXFn9_I(pI(u)N9oqj~9b!+yVf>4n&a-Z?tMQHn9GfXoV&*K>i`kGdAL&uZOtTpj}&do$ELtD-b-md`wW4s z{Pa16GIpE?a-*I?UWQwsSF^K-Q~X%-f$~WgfYs!D>}dUcZo%0y47yz5dC7?Ulnx1L z?^{5+x_Cd0LO^Nf!iAzlA;;!8&?m3*Y$8I#gL&X0!k&#k=~9pTBwaW!ty*$@Z<20% z24X(bStv^wn)Kd}ZRnw(*50x@4mr+TK}J=p-~sEfqo1ml2)?tbnOPY2Wo9&oXVO3Y zN0?^1L4P=9wR-`s+~v{ieQ`~wqYHO18cR=ci5IAkBw?mv9yakJZ~lqdcw#@nxXO-( z4ZgU1dRz|r+v6g49ZFQg9n}|DH^3uv52NWQd;|Gi_~}k85P9Db-EmVO$GEN(hf8Et zyf-iR!b15?pZE-$N>rY7%vUf0X1H>X-4Uin4?kFC{vBN>=toeBC5ZZ~5C@$r49DCe zG1Vu;$+jxqC~d5|E}`V5$~|daG_qrX@i=ia+^N&c`NgMbGoQ{MD&_wM%SFR*zpy^wJQ2i2DMf;Lw6cL>Dx%;g_@jOK_h%zXU=&a^fXZ(wks z6vrSCdE+do&&K=y$ma#bGEQ2lZl&ciX_56**ObMTTW8aWbkRcN9Q1BBruABI9e?v^ zxlKfgT9m%b8C}{x_HlY%^g#x{KKNigsg_7hIYHO!@hh9*5K}j$sPw_B5#^F?qTN5N6jx#dRLqqTW0CXbtRLrWm$Z2wM)P>nvLTjyDKP<*X3&#Sfh z231CX8_2HljfqY(j_tTF+#mMI3y&$V^fR)Az6gb@>dx}p-FMQBCApuBZ#0jwOu!7{%l7Qkhj%YlXTC1< z-Ji0E8K?^N{frx|kS^9+wbOhXF(}<6(exP!Be+M0bLt~$zd2eYx%OH~Ywk-`is|4~fGAeY-RP%{XUs=%Pa?6K5VR$5*7f(-fNcuh}L zV~)oW;ycJX6PR3WFrbSP<~wzxM5@bp7LWA~T2ATL1_af8X+|mWM$crt>6~9!OaFGm zJL6ANibMBPU+CI~{-JbsZopT16!0-B@yI_LZ41QxgKLVyjN~YQiuEb_X0_+IYbHNh z%By)HU#isZyA)ey_xt({ls1UvjTXAEnU4gFvp2N7?@XN0J!yXshGns90d6}U(OfeCOmxnB}9d`_p@LtR0D zB7P(Lx(>KIj(6HVR(|5c4m#x7rRXCF+n85HUof7^Z{__mTj?TT*~XCKr1r;STzvcH z%n!a}|eOZ?gDg>T@nZ@Hf~>pCbat8u4XC zb8@lRAydumX3{;2nK!<-)sgnR1fOrDG8dozZHeJlm9RM1HrnpPyLdG<~ zso;)a`lS!1=u-s8Uh#(cU_fA2yU|HxQ`e=9V=aPhe#z2R+)#Al?;krE;RIC2 zXGL+X%|cJuTT}04qvci+Z+Q>B6A?pfbUu1KZ)IkyLLXr>JPYIYf5|4rP4Lo^bZNUo zSzxSIT<88z=@wVh8e{&aR-{J~ZeDJ(g{mIr6iU90tMkXH2_~mInA2orE+tU~1fP16 z8ZsU8YXTI>P5Q^Hw_j`e(=tDHa%vCg^ILyQ==^McoWJuknwimc4WW0&*KxpaxC%S6 zHRX->JETsD7$0_I7x$`GUPTh7cD7z()_^~4B`edy>sdU?Hzr5EnVXpjZ6fD?j<%4p z+`AP^BNNH}LGQymMA&K{$Mr+D2P_4QR@biMOtP+dy~5HWw&%C`1M^0;RS*KwU;DeQBX-|Lj$fA<1+{`hM$q|U&T-Z@JM|{9 zj~c^)=*n4w=%LN~E)rAU&~oy6WnL!XD^3YjSIM3mqGLu9=*=ge93BSj3uK;0&y7sx zKWYL0`^}dsiP~xwiP}tkssnCPB?XUs&l|33&}hWA9Nxa1ysd>#4Uk^PRK`6Fg?&lM zFP6m?@t^6l0np1cHebsl-Pb%IvsP)=_(-53CKd5A`CyAHL}cItqY(2NAq8g?iCkSr zHnWk)cx0F36Im_Zl(HrO+j6@9ld(ldGG?%h>Vt*Y+*a}aWMoSPCwx#hJc%X{DN z&Bn#$_mJF`5t7bRxlYvDU%6MixvtKBulV=pu*MC_pc!MnD%bCC%dlTVD9PAI5aFm9 zy-F%`h};mEOW&6`RXe9X_?#WQL9t?%`KqV(ULh-j70hlO%poiHJ2tKCBIeCwAKY=aTuJIxCX7jfzG`v<3z&uJKi-FD8#El)@kI~s(TT9uDHycB*VV)a>{iDR4Nq;m-U6VVh>JEW4u z^ps0PUXuOh%h76hp2GU*3Vr(ngKZO~^xZ7J`60h$IR>Q%%1B;UjxyPo5j9JMk|~aK z#g@xN+NgU2gVpm-)ztXqQj6~oE}5ZhSw1ghwJ(r)b56{TWkg+`OESdW4q7w`f-b@5 zNa$Z~Ob}Zfw>|h1pi}YlaVdHq`5D5!mVUR}@0O2WBOYemWz!Gduk&NY`4Q4#8TBFb z%pPf^6asEQ*_fZ+=Hz(zRx(j)EKC2*pD)vXSve*yb4R`jYvB7(;5T!u_GXHs&d0!|NAXpUn*^zYAqQb#v@g4c z-}DASz)=xnr5i*nVrSgf#32;j8tZB^D8Ij^pwBiwzY@HG0Y+=+Kz^LNXCFv$MWQ# zfqI|s0XUY_)z{B^KX~v!My3~{k0S6BM66*e3WRYp@6is-BYupDem8dQzS(br{~hiq zps$BOOwYoVR=xYL8`D6{2X)c?h6QH|YHEqV(}T+3pRW-wdE^6Z zp~Wf)j>yO$*Vj>;6PPuo12Yk3x5yh5xg9nP|Cn$M#KgwN0>WJ#dbsf6!|}sEKOd^8 zsTp+d`9ZaXqtNv7atB!UWIDIRT!TA*0K+6%dDAPDi=!Lo9m; z%O$vmoj;1X9`pconFNp~UN1x_49>zKWCMP=mz9>5CJMJYs10p~-rz4f#uR#W6`b~> zFYvE)NuB;HcydLHT+CS}Vq;4wm!?+{YZETO z>Z+)yP~mESemO3798YBkGFYGtRW_~1ihgfHB)x##xhUeh`UXL7471hxreWaQ%1Yb9 zH>yN(G<{Ywx2kZ9)hsRfa72@OJt;K!E|$;Z=^9aw@}m?dmO-gb6q8^53)AXwZT zYyr>e(bTouPV3+X{Q+Qh3`R`Q0Al0d#3}tGg3(XpciJwj%lxc3HfELz92TkDC6PUq}di;PEW|poDQQ zv3x>@ulP=*@)^%K;^8e;lb)6S`xOmB}0tDzB(Ou$AV!PO~LLI`;e0w>%8V z7d-lj^w|w?v#Zj{YH4xA!Qx)j=UX2JV-K(q%>)#3;>P!20ps)V?g)JeV)@72hDV(p zLItus#@^4_2bGV*)sN$B89XstCbqUN92*-0`uB?aFb9whSssGt$Tkj510weA*jP_b zP*`|wdD&EP))^iRBK}73RD)IfzNn<+Gq4JS!IBoZgZ`U?N%|1m1017;&Jf8cb&;*- zGcz+_;J-QRLY8WzrR4@!86F03!2nQx<~AaP-pA(`K%km~pr;FTkyY<2nJ$sGKrdaTTwAkTkqC}n5#+ufJl&L$O%B~7HM>^ z9v1k+6c*SJnnp$e?-|nCKy~MhrjedL-w9?~aN=!v`*t+f3)pIf1BjIQ?}6K*;^N|V z?vk^0xYEz>vS6R#7I@k_J98@E7J;g&lsEJI?Q3p{x1)8&W*3U1aD=hh6Vlx~vbM8( zRa;wIQNbyu=k1lX)?oz-RbdO_{ERNa*~-the6rb>YH z#oqkq*C}n=W+Y}dw%4V^q;l~!KeG#pgClTL(4YQqE-=sk$i?{o`+ZR1+OMBKf1aG! z?CtIDl2KB6-jtzV8|2&h{{1#7scQ@wH8rE3dh~lmSZyKywpn5lp_v(mP!*$-8E#*1 z0~r8tO1*r1P<_75RTsW~Jxrt;5bzsJ88>?Q1qDI$x`KlOGlr7h8h_f9(?btlBSMm)zQ8cj}*Fq>(@=`m(pz7x^@BmQGmd z9h`AqzkY378WSJhBKk+}^r3WYfWJRlR??6B{QQyA7MjFE<~28sgZJopa$9x7uhugI9UhuQzx!O>j*<9| zQru!vw&@MfSo^4ZSj0?8JbVE?iLL_!Ioi32*d%d#wGP_t3H@w)O@A_T@DGTylO4v3 zzqX?kg4R6{(S$rjSo|pMj&6Fdu|LeID5d){Vuw+tegUMi=G#;Tqn*O@1IcFoMl<}` zZ?~KhldVEVw$S8t>`dszePXBN?UK`tXSpQem%2%T^dWEopU9@HYnEQu^e%CphaM%=k>ns2chAQ9`Uzzq?&_ z^qzR<#P(^ED#WP~4zX|KJU`CN;Nv^V55|Ac%3?bh@5QF?vM=%K4(hf=7>#mpk~3Zc>Nl4i_C*A>2Osp*KL3-5I?V^1SLpO%oMfY zLaEB>o$;;R;pT99nYpU5H8d6XUZgy+$qK6^lbe-9FGuy&yW_1Bt&v0_@xa`hlSDet zV(Jr7%;+2YG~)ewdv;x^-?OV7cIm6ses}rVaF?l-ldb;kjr!>CXk2&9>w_X1`~0VP zl!;+2O>W>jOGkMzjSnUgSYI%)9Sbmptse2A9aeq#MJyjfBcSEnfGYBZOG@mOGOZPk zIk&V(n#vu8q*2Znj)%|a#qJZtdMjK#H_PHlJ7!^GeR6hS<4KT%9q6cPBHHJr)@Ngd z^k946xB)$q#&MpgZ4m~llLM5}_C`kc2D0(_^tau^H(SI=?x%B;{cQqZaiKFSUZdNe z=-OFWUDQV_&%3l+Ak%hYcxfgj_8f+SHMTb7$T{CzvYrn5PPD^Q z&qK_77q>Z`qn@5|cKGJ^v0}anrfVLeix{h6^ZJ5l#NIv}*iBpMA9uWw`5GE-fBPy$ zTIi*AZDDmk{QbYTJNmxG>FIV%tr-#hW0Oz5vTo*C{x>6>vA*1EV4Ff7?-^qddr{^U z+E5?DXJbf9UGS6F*Uao%z=vPrw<^9mnDTUUTmJt28zM>^MT^VISZq+42jxz0DeL;%aUjDVWQB^9hweJg*e^kZjJ#;mxu)BQvmdf(D&(wqgHPkdG!&Gj*ez$#^!oZidU( ztn4V*t$So8jHthaC`38&EUabh*8DZvL~9|{P7`KS3E`wL-lq5iP6EwLm|t}0Gd1+F z9J7-Sf*&~;_xliuu^dF#HZzJj1k`Nw4m_nmq=5Z~e%U5-d{wN*udBAOLY;$O%=|5G zu_7Ka_h)lgEbfQkX!4{+PB{q1>KI~FYo>1%A{_krwGiZV-&sZ&8ccJ;WnI2(&|vQgTndy|31;ew0d@z%*|mJP-g+IyygS zrPqHtHF#(c*R`b-Aqk{My$XiYRpc-2+Zz+Uu_N3-82Aj=rBi|0ABL&W1L+EJ0_%G1 zrEN}rk=D~9PdAejddci^u8jF@da~bKU~2#<%+7f5N$u^cgD7S{CfS%24U(OB`&<*l zQ52GhMxN@ys@2sgEXTK0od;ZRm1kId)X5?IZNrfNGoI1}t!ayAnUibuWw#1HKYw21 z{P*oVBxHmvgXAUFn4G?CpG-|swoNd~+i6!ZCC=^E`$l8X`H5Ujy?VeYC4W<+k$!T( zW_N7@(hBZAXG|x(ofv8${`F05^pMSg`-4^HX7a2JR&(BPT;6LFh5umzaM{o7KE?1%(@twe)Jv za$gfC5Wt4Arz`MLPkA~|`@wPNu)i{Ji%mWHe#rz+mz$P;pIir!+a*RRogExxf~@%r zEjNuf^K1AyNoY4>nw>+_Fnc6B^Y*ahGvDc298sn&FDIFUEQ7ZO{=Db-iGB*WUDyTAkYX^fx#l{kiPi5=3yO@ASUDyDMvGRNQm#SE8yZr~o zHyc2CS@PX@DkVf4=!|muinJdf&~~7?lu3d-YKvm!G*X3Pa_6@8hHaMHz}v=Uh{T~R}vxWJNqnZ99G}ytBB&;-Z$##4riEsev zZKVR*4kKAp-=eTcFVVbxS}S;Fjvmi}VhB3ptJB0kbGg>I3q~&O9~T$f#MDlyl{l_9 zak*1pMy>!NQtClM=?^f%p~#=T@vC^5qR_=V*wabD+djceltkMWZ3I{{sh+`r5H?DL zdB*^e;+n=)K^!NBw_544oZd5cY96=qOED=JJ3M{wdwcA*2=|^sD9ZBr zx|Vn_T*pC-M|OKm_^&hE@9OuJ7Bg&>WIAJox!i#9OO-EUhNz>BhXqL_v$kN$)ysXH3C$iThAx zu7KC26BYR37y;_MktR6#`ICm~Oma-U;Sy~Q1~-TZ7?T<+^kfvg2#dqoXYx4|;nxiO zcE~n)dT`JmEtTU{02%2N=0nj0jbtL>>K^tY@4O!RuHAfum-Pe#v95b3JC26ffWXoD zrTn#UdvWp2pW=5~a zW1|Q)M%_7_FKcg0_Gqyf+Z%s`YMw^$k%NO)=L-~mYWo}j0xT27Kev_zJX={LA;+hC zuKIb|=?`EI;g9JlDw{u(f4cds^@{L>t{kzA#6R^wr52_W-5C%9pM{ji_zUO0gPk^RPdorw?2WF;e9qu_#YO81y2;M(7y9I zIfot?Ct0oLf!W2ST~+u`nL1iE^pMl25Idzy#PL1vioZ!ghqLi<`+KId#A(?T+KtKA zj7Tei$7&}=-ZaVxdTnys%H`4u_CQ#x`ugb4Vl{JMi20UU@!GHhp9`=5wD9)jU=IOG z%8QY1w$E(p-@)-})sk+$Ph&Vjr7^5)w)4vC_4DLE{Hl2-lUa(|7F9GZR!!JMMGrz5 z@dHiV6F=i4J5>enl^*lEt@`0Q%6_J>j(oB`HHxvOqA9uEhuC;G_;$imnD`@H6QzWV zqVZ`wsEW$gLoj$A*gI0b)UL}n5B-Z*Rv{(ItR^HRm}zWeam$6`^YMgn*03nfSyG#5 zUi)q1|CKPC=a2{k^>~6^A}zwc$d~@DppgsFp88X`2f6Yhwxx~LJ*^TQhB)ie_($?lo8Afq;q{4pw`nAD~ z62;Q5A#LwKY(w#$DCC=Kh8bz+Q(iJjtXREy#J!qi?Jp_#w*}0|>No zXsOElhRE3fh0CheMuE0t$M2=@Q%~;s!}A-ILDT{G^%lRS%7K)uDQzIeyj+07z>n9` z&pF{cKNmzd!Mv$whWO!BUfunGnGs56>jJxv;P04y^BX*2=~$IDc$vv~w{bX};$#b& zp7{ai^dP|wE1IWG`}saVh*6a5Q}BXXnLS4r7pT^MJTlAg_HOjE$|ASa6$gSXr&w=% z`h4Pp*aYdmiU+kQmMJQI^fyGdxttoq3h019Hj3u8E9co;S||r#rVMh?*^BuX4`}r# zqnPFK2hMEj3=ABn;NaExB1-f1!EV@lrnDqPtp+_Ys_z~@__JI;C|6%voK#sljF?7qJ=VP&`bRl2+oQk5Cmp}rg z-X_#rPsqQ8N#I&q=SA`RQhMXyvn^)%cs2fUM16j$`61Z1Nb!LMU~BmKr4tHT zpM|VlH3D7s&k5KJc!+Xva1>z}2?WP}0FVvsGV<3TOJ&D7E6)Z^>yHU*XN1wvnmgL> zcq>wawD$IPfWO4>r^Rg37zz=QDTIyR);9$W38lUgXpn0rGh5{hgGtrZ&xe1AMEOZ? z_=JwCcqcK531`L+-Q%3HIsmT{4?>ft6ZMy9zB!B1xkb(!(Clp;o4!ej{0hb9Z-Fs-uAB>z6OiExU{=q_#`YXe^QoDJEC6d|`cV zKG1Bn>eRS25Ho1WzwmSRp$matRQH{FvMOVLQ2rDc26^1*;FKnx9NtBf{BdBNW6QR`1qOg6-RJ&izE2C zQPKlfTMw^_Rea)0Lm9<(8*vG;9KYx4^nkb|8eP%D!=vG5T?8D?s2-^eb`C04X`-1+ z3E#@gs6r@?$+!f1^B%n^<;m;NoD4ZH4SDns&ajik-OJN+>EX@5+?{+%n!l!1BZV74 zk7B=#pTaQ~8XBsl|AtaP99?P^Pov?mZjy!-=9w<&vj`xr;`M~@zrzpmuMytLUu41fT0VMP%(qVsF9b+`=iEs!|e=gWJ&74a`2(=6vi#y{4h1)4)cLsqN+77O>r z36&OCW&f+PTzj6D_Pam)Z`;`B>p@k>`OiCQF%uCH!3tDIyrd^i=)I$#)V~8DjN~6`d&$~=n425P{cnTTSS=}e;i&MsyquMl^{%LBHY_Nf$TW`1MXhs5h0#&2 ze?J|i%}Dy>!otGGk6Vb3PS$4QH-9wb)toYw;RO|cbaeFW@(7-v&Fl3gCnpF#zm4dZ zDF=5L&jLDMQc*DmpPpHeii!&0ZG?R+(PQm09jhw%zm}Hsnwq4-w(OugBL9HWa$y)` zA8TOR^NINkVP+8<9#ZfBlR`!?Q>al6Va^N^68a`w8zgOx-Yb|ff!ijoD11|%@ZsU% z+Id3w|C;UqFIQLG;l|gme>EBAEN`}4VR(bEXrp5^eeji#fRl1eL z)-ggTxBUuPonQ3^>T8Gj9Ia$qCLZ?i^hK+HVe7%Ao`;ct|2(rFCJxIBB_--VneDba zN74+gi=_3KbvVS!x4vOXIB+GW+#!Qk_0dmv9fm6WRWuwi)ljo*@$@U1UgN#;+olQA zMPg#?psU05?IbG@^3y^0!GK8*?S>r59|0!B<3)Qr84YI_7cb^dBUPC%!O*Jfu5yh6 zp`tYE9IAQ~pK8-J`g!nNOo^|yLq_OjqO)SO$fvq!bMl0C)U)_lNZCuBtJN7?+Xj`c z{nj>4u;RNLYxfxL4@>f&fJC9gLv6(9kyfY%Jznu9?HP^5U^>qn12s9hWS)xOX zudRMpSTqZLb3-z`YWIHM?BA8LsUhzqeB>Z+#&a_!t)2{n=_(}9D*rw@rO;q+zTeQw z@Bgp>{t8n1Tw*pO8Zz}6b5k@L<>>0*QbbUq?5*(j`gn~;1F$%Pf`S5-U7{6FXHB)V z%!hkX0va=_-aixK`FSn1>oAI)ijvaN-rlXBvGA}5<2|tTS(vP?t%FPB4AEo}4@@%5 zQvX>vwlcj)H>sn#FiCROe_6e{wQ$e<$B!RXCYh1vuL)?8w~87Yf9*^b2C9P|I4uPW zdoRu|a*1T|B$wD1$eqvc@gIPXvJO(5ir~YgY+-q!1>dFBU8R!RnlvR_Tc)j|j*grL z{M)>iiNLrBOUKoc0mWW|W=nVA^FSOk;Eg&89U@eLkIrl9E} zy^D^gX=-ly+DzUc)=g&L(%PETEg&FZ(B1u%e) zc(HaK*~(0UhLrB!^R@qc1Qj#pt~6Y4L2`;ro6&L{u7L_-3&<@`S-Uoqru#`|6T`X$ zs@G8B%1c*j_Jha=9 zclj1s@w|5}(cTd+zVDU0;b9VZbs!g2i=z&YZ<*Q;BQ3-&J)$x2kPFrn;^5-)fdu;o z4s2#dw_270ZmF|y&im+DnpjakTmx4Xc_&U9iegdzjbWrCH-cVh2e3-J(xi;w6BxbRqoP1CK_;u=; zXZZ!eudlhqP)MZ>q6S0p`WarmjntqNy-Qgis4kDLqeY3TKC&5&HNHbmbu4h@x5aN` zumJ-(TK!GLlYOO#5=Wa{RO#50U9dwqdENVF9`BuS+?%wh@WtHklpN>d%F*=hstMEm z=rcF-tqQ1W^l1ti?2q&FSyZ5E?&nP_SJzc%tE^B|8%r9AnwmRV8Iz5$~ycy@<}hJ>whC5nh;@TFC6`uq$YygCIDHuP?(uAi|!d@{!IQQ}6$AtwWZS9nmBUD83 zPKqx0ie2=5e1+7wF~G`DU-rA)@cluvlO`dQv-5g~A*LpZ_-~MKUjH7wjr~K*AYd~y zZ|#K*n@}2j+q{T1@N|9LC)&m8NoH}18PRVA&i1aVOQ+liKHF4o1kdJMp*6K~&KaGV?F^#_U^;V@fV@}1yP5dL5&+mQbRsy zJMYtEE_=fwd^@G0qvm2cABPpXvak}4U0Atp%AiRIHv}C|fDzQ5JDDT_l0j_(!!EF4 z=ot>P2N?We^VHVYkNUAi1dN-^*EoL-ko@jPpG97Z^6vP|4CXx)ya+xC^nO70iBzrL z*+;U$b*=r;#_pFd1p^Y6@=iw!JYhoeV(HwUaml*~cVG2V(H&Chwf9oymdm_T;(Xj3 zT300T_@1ZXkrtq=RL&d#8ygC8V&($_)Dpv&+^*GKCV_74 zqwxZvpZf(y9}iM~yt~2N^YJdX#>~s=sls~6v(lmCbF=Y5#nlpTa)C%rLqom1(3R=w zb&EJVH(LvekXw`vPGU2kxPz7pc8?d8ET(6&jH{h7`;@{@TRP+he9T>Ua|c!~MpsV9 z#$P?mq{Ymp{KFSxObFuE686)scL`K7DBII`f8#|MX**P$3^lO>QoW{lx^Ww<-i{xq z+Fz*i&0MflD9V~Th*jr|i)B}uYF~YH7^3#K>^rso)3QY8%uOvZ#vRg6g(D`E=rv8F5 z4kg0%eBM&Bc%{Ml^RW@z_YSM&`FW&7z8Gs)))JCBbTfkXtAuE>#MyJP*1Gk6%9FH% zQoBoTn!cja!f_|jb;E?_<-S^ZowQc%l2$(3)|OX4ufwV3)53y6+(x*>#NUQ4`A(y6 zrY+h=VLM$eU-=Sg(mPgOV&U2RW`Y-W=Tud0or1v&HtpxFqHI$dR#rN$+6xCOOFT#4 zQ)T?dV^Rsu>c`U0>vO)?l-GI$s(MX-53QIHO*7f}_`T0uhb+E)bnttgC)16y*hMHT z0u+M##~?J->V#)d`ux+$;zqilvy)T3Trz@OW;%1*GvMx0m!`8VP3kZ2mI2O2&yrTN z;Lnq=m*wX#TKsMH0tXjx<)z+Ikg=SDP#9O8M*L2QKIJy zYKQBTiyOAB^_66`GOYy|t6G%;x7wP5xy8PIWMcJsFf>zd@p}eyh&?da!{Vuo&rIIA z*E=s4Hv!iMqkETEz8idLW0KpL!xhv52k#4>k@a)j7(EiW?)X89&h71Mk*Eu{OdAjc$gN!~xv)#2i*CmxXZb=9MF#cE^fZ25O~o~1tDQ1kaT zrb7Kc(mQgETXQ?6{Csck0x$yW!uUbQNvzwh)yS}R-zQJ8Rs7tHp(naS2 zjyTsH4;qG(>VAky4R`pseh5GnD)c%Ga2j{HIJdWI_w;XGK6YbZNlR5SY z;OLno4N!4i>{S!Jb?RVST!rap-YchPZGJu7KP$37*TWu5eD_@5Ujm2Nl9h;-rhMz? z|iFj%{NL$+QYfD zHt%32MDwvyR6@X~p|C$212eU?^YzbW6PvS~FzVpoUlfk2RzHnajVA;PN$<{Rcvxdz zd}5yneqhEsAB^WMLhk9vV)lnG=?9UtDtQCdd%r~&ELpkmG{P$GzkOFc0ot@D$$U55 zo5+~uU#aVDp&u+G-&IyP68$)s>fq6qA!*0-+^ioU_|T$Gzp9JM#y67HC;(pzBd@IT5eD-C9 zs3gTnl4gHa=Z#=CC@Y~GP|uZEdWsFF+r>dJC0I1z6&AL8@chG34g#;~AxiwLp+P0~ z;+1r2AbPRl4|P20XzBOw3zS}kLeD0zV9uJLTE(Aqpz`|@Wi!vvOccwaZf5#w`--=e zpZ4!)bg`+ML3%?r?b0YJmo|@4I@p~qILkR4|5sO69uDQ&#)V{%J=vle`@Ux>gt5%n z8T+nm8H`;SBWnf;*@}`SYxX50Df^ZsyFu2REJ^AJaeU8ozVDy!zqwpHLZ=j_YifB;CC3Q#uL z+bUjDP+*#xg*a0ljE$v2oSO-Z_vSCfG&f&UlW_N~AP@+k$#2I+8^VNQ*(prk%}8>T z@3pmu3K!6gaFLP)*!{qIhrrtAZ4ryxx?n{a^Q0CH4J zaair$`{2-+tlW{34KzXxi; zgHQXQcLZMY1(~-@&~D0(N~dBeuAZs)T^ti~NK)mF%WDxtjwB1u+vJOL{bum#x-6lu z@IkcUW7`e~hvn1fj_fi1g;g(Z<-BT|%ke?30AcKtNVmo3KCjmDPX_W?$F1gKqXstl zSA5*p{CT)e@Ki>jHd0x~5YndSS5s3ZS#_Ke+H=<3=&LiIt1}gkRvnj-@Kp#cz;L7K+0|wVkkYc(^jrqB-pY7>9#C;tV%6#?dX6|@-L7OPGlv$J% zW%S9&=;;w~4OG=TCMX=?ycIf8VC)!Cwb(QBo`W=lse9nu%Focyj2fH#d;X`4ks}cm z+$mgm7St&x?!Y$CGv>jo`M^3IRAC{3QUU!=ZsF(6;arvP15Y`IcwPpssc_A~DW+`A zE#t^|*m)XtS^3tCvC%@5lA&(h=4qTPOOIqXJ={Z-)6+IgyFBbWHzE%z6OQVinj>F@ z2Rb-701cijI}~{Xh#rM!+uPgYRJispZUZ_oPt5R8!W!Oj;}ph>U>&UEJfeGFueoQcVfu=Mj9^_ z(&rJbQ3YRN>T=k$r-@c@amh-3s%ojtj>D#!oPmu?zbk*IhBXUYbh0R08H`8A2%$S#oQxDp zv)OB-4Nu9BZ9sy|I60oHJV1`$-~V3?I5HjGAn?rIq*hL>WHe}%QWoxq^WnfrV{pdU z$p&o2$)Fa9gfVWX0UWu>p8dB|cS@}{zF=9tw;tBB+;J`5FG~~JG<>1(IF6Ac*5iEu zC|EO8l<%g~*y}C#`d#OGQgX?di_9T0EEdN5?-xptilZK?Cg|3 zgVA#xzFpUbSRag)q0z*~O)v!Yd$vvpac3B4X*H8T?(HZQ*R3DB#3nIpBHn_WF-M;= z+>IqSII$VgrsD>B`1KW#vxZm)lHnM>JVH4j`iM7O)#jS#*ZVXNfyh=UHb*@9z*zc6 z83}OUhm}+eLMyzVMxfR&2=pDNxbwB|C}+MO_m~u<%c$Zt=8|Lx_A+@63BDo&rmbeo zDgm7VEj1U2DsccwIQIg8Y8EKqP8wZk*~G8*d8_7~iif{%XF(hF26)*sjWe(|HXI_q9-x2LL%eXD=-<;(pX80G zW#$GBTrJL2p~#$#jg38;hlO7#vp>_t1QmqzP>ptu`isH?%927uLWr%hs8w@lbW}vC zjac}BR~!b!s)$D2LM~e@M=OY(B}b2niJQkLROgh}#)M;I%aA*UZ4-loNHPBQvO{N9 ziurE=gd+5?SiiPp_E?dQhwbY-XTg&hskYHaN0qLwNkX%T+%r5N9YJhL<3vnowvQdP z4E@Q>0lb5J=<36f%cF-uVEL!79Kr+{(Ng| zYklo=thBK5=_!SUMJ9)eXnhI~H#2%3Ctr?SZqdm4%Y`>K-$ChSuhkjm&6_u-$v8b9 z>Efjk#IcT}j9#()uui$4BLV6=h8at_$#t_N}Yz z{B+9Mn+R}fs33KzL1_4O2PSBz=GZ$Ofag9;b{y+?W{J4M&JKv%q2}biGINHKLP1rt zWoDWiTbtL^8DI7Y$_JcNWdS==@=`yuXLv$YMFkB9iK@?q4GFwqQtd!Tb>aN7glU^x zVjh1b{46Rybp;`HSR&R+68S4WDGT&?klrT^4!5$ogv~Del_(o}=dBne=}!9}=+Tbc zE3~vMG#)%fzcm_aOqB1~Oo~Pds(VP89a%%PJK^`UADeL)KC^b zAZR4J{*V@**Pkl+^@6)t6o-|8HMzyfzF_WQqXwgL@O5K1-Z3tx8=cT+J5He9+lW4@ zZdkgqE2&3OgxjvrEu#3=k7?7LIg_pT2y_ZoD;`Rtb zVGhe^J(r#D=LGhYS>tppn}Ov3lu2M6*r#+0&zsWXpBFI}qFU~x*+q_h-TcrX6{J0v z@GG|f=Wy@I&voz82oEls%Y; zrFg({b-zpHi7w4DU=@K22H3#}ZF+9s&-mPGC%!mA;gD#ogX6d6EB+FF0XdgjTd}vN zE9E>M1-+yX1jv=+JITv{I1=^&X#Ww~)B45xHO8=&PV*h_Vyc7mBEr#CF3J&WZUNa1 zKrA|c_%4juq-sugj;fl}zO%giPY#SzGK%d-^!XnSS^FH~QTK%7D0g>u?Ax(khbF`7(NY~lvnmrqWg-sK8-3~&R+uL#8OK$a}mIyzlHxbUWPXI2cs;Y}pu3&zOq?1{} z?y&MDz_R4PK%)8%I8pxo`=hxggNIYH>Ps)_SYd~!xw*9E?)VdGslz9AI7IJEKTA&r z%+7BLl~p}5XB1>ZlS$f&c+5Vp5^i$^OfM}hefk7K-xus7mfL9Yk3r{bpt^@+08?#_ z6@Dw8aB{P=*Mxq` z^s2Ewz+6B7GtcP9|62{_vm4LKTaNk5gz|m}DvoT3b0e7A7XlfzaO3kwAwRO|3*Q5+%G#PCv|D*vB&YmS4EU->d+y{{TH6ib9;6og*VVJIi7ASt27Nqat;N6lC|;WN*mc&$R`AAwy^z K!K*c$qyGbh(LZJY literal 0 HcmV?d00001 diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/product-witness.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/product-witness.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..665cae4c70d --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/product-witness.md @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ +# Mission 4 local/restricted product witness + +## Verdict + +The repaired local Petrinaut panel crossed the accepted visible boundary: + +```text +real Petrinaut panel :4915 + → same-origin /api/chat proxy + → brunch-agent :4322 + → AI SDK transport + → production Flue ChatAgent + → sdcpn-modelling skill + → visible runbook-ir workpiece +``` + +This is a local/restricted product witness, not a remote deployment. + +The owner accepted the scored architecture with explicit limitations and authorized a witness-only repair after the first panel run exposed incorrect resource invocation. No post-repair paid campaign or quality claim is made. + +## Initial failures and repair + +The first browser launch rendered blank. Browser evidence showed a Petrinaut `Maximum update depth exceeded` failure from a stale package bundle. Rebuilding `@hashintel/petrinaut-core` and `@hashintel/petrinaut` with their installed Vite 8.2.2, then rebuilding the website, restored the tracked panel without source changes. + +The first visible conversation then activated `sdcpn-modelling` but passed relative labels to `read_skill_resource`: + +- `templates/workpiece.md` +- `references/universal-elicitation.md` + +Flue rejected both because packaged skill files require the exact advertised URI. The agent continued without the resources and emitted a workpiece that mislabeled an inferred current state as expert evidence. + +The owner authorized the smallest repair: the skill now tells the model to pass the exact `/.flue/packaged-skills/...` URI shown after `→`, never the logical label. Focused package, application build, and production-routing tests passed before the rerun. + +## Repaired visible interaction + +Conversation id: `ec5c509f-4a93-4327-9c50-25b0f26b8fb5` +Local principal: browser-local UUID retained only to identify this witness +Application route: `http://127.0.0.1:4915/api/chat` proxied to `http://127.0.0.1:4322/api/chat` + +The user supplied a bounded scheduling case: Line 2 had just finished white; a Meridian white was expected in roughly two hours; a tint was ready; white-to-tint and tint-to-white estimates were 45 minutes and three hours. The assistant activated the skill and asked one focused question about whether a tint run could be interrupted. The user answered that it must finish and cannot be abandoned without disallowed scrap, then requested the recoverable workpiece without net construction. + +The production trace showed: + +| Operation | Outcome | +| --- | --- | +| `activate_skill({ name: "sdcpn-modelling" })` | `output-available` | +| `read_skill_resource({ path: "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A6c061650fd9e9474/templates/workpiece.md" })` | `output-available` | +| Visible `runbook-ir` | Rendered in the Petrinaut AI assistant | +| Construction tools | Not used or mounted | +| Net mutation | None | + +The workpiece visibly separated expert evidence, working account, assumptions, checks, not-yet-asked material, two case paths, a cross-cutting issue ledger, consequential gaps, and net status. + +## Honest limitation + +The exact-URI repair worked for first workpiece creation. The assistant still did not read `references/universal-elicitation.md` and `references/profile.md` before its initial substantive question, despite the lifecycle instruction. This repeats the scored candidate's disclosure-restraint finding. Under the owner's accepted-limited disposition it remains an explicit limitation, not a hidden pass or a reason to claim general architecture superiority. + +## Retained visual evidence + +- `product-witness-initial.png` — blank first launch before rebuilding stale Petrinaut package output. +- `product-witness-workpiece.png` — first visible workpiece with failed relative resource calls. +- `product-witness-repaired.png` — repaired exact-URI run with the workpiece visible in the real panel. + +`product-witness-rebuilt.png` is the restored panel before the interaction. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.cold-attempt-2.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.cold-attempt-2.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..8d4e362be47 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.cold-attempt-2.md @@ -0,0 +1,126 @@ +# Cold IR review — prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006 + +## Verdict +- Overall cold utility: **3.2 / 4** +- Downstream semantic readiness: **conditional** +- Confidence: **high** +- One-sentence diagnosis: Excellent epistemic discipline and actionable gap identification create a reliably reconstructable skeleton, but missing quantitative parameters and initial conditions prevent objective-credible modeling without explicitly conditional assumptions. + +## Reconstructed model + +### Purpose and decisions +The scheduler needs to test scheduling decisions before production execution. Four simulation questions drive the model: on-time delivery performance, changeover hours consumed, whether alternative sequences reduce changeover time, and optimal reshuffles when Line 2 fails. Success measures are on-time delivery (especially for penalty-risk customer Meridian), changeover hours (management wants these reduced), and recovery sequencing capability. The weekly planning horizon runs Monday morning (demand book arrival ~8 AM) through Friday shipping, sometimes slipping to Monday. + +### Boundary and horizon +The model starts when the ERP demand book drops Monday ~8 AM and ends when orders ship after QA clearance. Inside scope: scheduling, line allocation, production execution, QA hold, shipping. Outside scope: ERP demand generation and materials supply (noted as occasionally short but not detailed). One-week planning cycle. Weekly demand is 40-60 orders, each specifying SKU, quantity, and due date. + +### Operational flow +Each order progresses: demand book → scheduler allocation → sequenced slot → changeover → production run (mix → mill → tint/letdown → fill/pack) → QA hold (~4 hours whites, sometimes full day specialty) → ship. Production uses three lines with different speeds, qualifications, and shift patterns. Holding tanks exist between mill and fill; Line 2's tank is better than Line 1's tiny tank. Daily 7:30 AM huddles adjust the schedule for overnight events and problems. The scheduler groups orders by product family (whites, tinted colors, specialty clears) to minimize expensive family-switches. + +### Resources and constraints +**Line 1:** Slower baseline speed, qualified for everything (all whites/tints/specialty clears), two shifts, reliable, tiny holding tank. + +**Line 2:** ~2x Line 1 speed on whites, qualified for whites and tints only (never piped for specialty resins), two shifts, better holding tank, **hard constraint: Meridian whites must run here** (customer audited this line), **reliability issue: filler jams every week or two** (duration "couple hours" to "half a shift"). + +**Line 3:** Speed between L1 and L2 (closer to L2), being qualified product-by-product (can run most whites, some tints not yet signed off, specialties qualified more recently), day shift only unless overtime approved. + +**QA lab:** 2-person team, runs tests, backs up end of week. + +**Changeover times (known):** white→white 20-30 min (quick rinse), white→tint ~45 min, tint→white 3 hours (full washdown; pigment carryover ruins white). All changeovers produce ramp scrap (first few units don't meet spec), worse after big washdowns. + +### Variation, failures, and policies +**Line 2 jam disruption** (every week or two): When Line 2 jams mid-run, scheduler chooses from three options based on maintenance estimate, qualified line availability, and urgency: (1) wait it out if 1-2 hours and run almost done; (2) move rest of run to another qualified line if downtime ≥half shift and capacity available; (3) scrap in-progress and restart later (almost never—too wasteful). Meridian orders with tight due dates trigger more aggressive moves; small distributor orders that can slip favor waiting. + +**Practiced policies:** Group by product family when possible; prefer white-to-white sequences over white-tint-white (avoid 3-hour washdown); Meridian orders get priority under contention (penalty/delisting risk). + +**Other disruptions mentioned but not quantified:** Batch QA failures requiring adjust-and-retest, materials occasionally short. + +**Stated trade-off dilemma:** If Line 2 finishing a white and another white order "coming in a couple hours," hold line idle vs. wash down to tint? Scheduler "thinks waiting sometimes makes sense" but cannot prove it; boss wants fewer changeover hours. + +### Validation expectations +The model should show on-time delivery performance, count changeover hours, allow testing alternative sequences, and support pre-planning reshuffles when Line 2 fails. The scheduler is the primary user; management is the audience for changeover reduction analysis. + +## Scorecard + +| Subdimension | Score (0–4) | Evidence and rationale | +| --- | ---: | --- | +| **Objective and decision legibility** | 4.0 | "Primary simulation questions" (four bulleted) and "Intended decision support" (three bulleted) are crisp. "Success measures" explicitly ties on-time delivery to Meridian penalty risk and changeover hours to management directive. "Target Representation Notes" acknowledges formalism unknown. No conflation of simulation questions with construction format. | +| **Process and relationship reconstructability** | 3.5 | "Process Spine: One Order From Demand Book to Ship" provides step-by-step VW-01 walkthrough with stages, performers, constraints applied, timing. "Resources: Production Lines" documents three lines with speed relationships, qualifications, shift patterns, and reliability. "Disruptions and Recovery" details Line 2 jam three-option logic with decision factors. Missing: quantitative rates, fill-up times, shift hours, holding tank capacities—but all flagged as NOT YET ASKED and listed in "Open Questions" §1-10. | +| **Constraints, variation, and policy/practice legibility** | 3.0 | "Scheduling Constraints and Policies" separates hard constraints (Meridian→Line 2, specialty clears→L1/L3 only, Line 3 SKU qualification) from practiced policies (family grouping, white-sequence preference, Meridian priority). "Disruptions and Recovery" explains three-option jam response with decision factors and contextual examples. "Trade-off under uncertainty" names the wait-vs-washdown dilemma scheduler cannot yet prove. Gap: tint→tint and specialty changeover times not asked; Line 3 qualification list not asked; wait-time thresholds in practice not asked (all in "Open Questions"). | +| **Epistemic legibility** | 4.0 | Exemplary use of "NOT YET ASKED" inline (15 instances) and consolidated in "Open Questions and Unresolved Material" with subsections for critical-but-not-asked, consequential unknowns flagged by scheduler, deliberate simplifications (none yet), assumptions (none yet), conflicts (none yet), contextual variations. "Known" vs. "NOT YET ASKED" sections in "Quantities, Rates, Time" clearly separate available from missing data. "Reality qualifier" quotes scheduler's own caveat. "Initial Conditions and State" explicitly marks as NOT YET ASKED. No invented facts. | +| **Gap actionability** | 3.5 | "Open Questions" §1-13 prioritizes gaps as "Critical for construction." Each item is specific (e.g., "units/hour for product-line combinations," "tint-to-tint changeover time"). "Consequential gaps that block faithful construction" translates missing data into modeling consequences (prevent accurate time modeling, sequencing cost, stochastic behavior, simulation start, fit-for-purpose assessment). "Validation and Evidence Sources" lists NOT YET ASKED questions about credibility criteria and historical data availability. Minor gap: does not always state which downstream decision each question unlocks, though inference is usually clear. | +| **Reader effort and navigability** | 2.5 | Logical section hierarchy; "Process Spine" walkthrough is findable. "Scheduling Constraints" and "Disruptions" are separate sections. However: (1) changeover times scattered between "Process Spine" §5 and "Quantities, Rates, Time"; (2) Line 2 jam details in "Disruptions" but jam frequency also appears in "Quantities, Rates, Time" NOT YET ASKED; (3) daily huddle in "Process Spine" §3 but not cross-referenced in "Disruptions" where it appears again; (4) some readers may want product family definitions closer to constraints that reference them. Important material is present but requires spot-checking multiple sections. | + +**Overall cold utility:** (4.0 + 3.5 + 3.0 + 4.0 + 3.5 + 2.5) / 6 = **3.2** + +## Load-bearing assumptions + +**None explicitly introduced.** The IR states "Assumptions: None explicitly introduced yet" and does not treat unasked questions as resolved. This is appropriate discipline given the available evidence. + +**Implicit dependency:** The reconstruction above assumes the demand book structure (SKU, quantity, due date per order) is complete—but the IR does not ask whether orders have other attributes (priority flags, customer constraints beyond Meridian, split-shipment rules). This dependency is not load-bearing for the stated skeleton but would become so if the model tried to represent all practiced priority rules. + +## Contradictions or ambiguities + +**Line 2 downtime duration:** "Maintenance estimate at huddle: 'at least a couple hours'" vs. "Actual duration: 'more like half a shift.'" The IR correctly treats this as contextual variation (estimate vs. actual for one event), not a contradiction. However, the IR does not ask whether "half a shift" jam durations are typical or exceptional, creating ambiguity about the stochastic distribution needed for modeling. + +**"Couple hours" for incoming white order:** In "Trade-off under uncertainty," the scheduler considers whether another white order is "coming in a couple hours." The IR does not ask whether orders actually arrive during the week or all appear Monday, creating ambiguity about whether this phrase means "due in a couple hours" (from the Monday demand book) or "arriving mid-week" (demand book is incomplete). This ambiguity is consequential for modeling intra-week dynamics. + +**QA hold "backs up end of week":** Does this mean QA duration increases, QA queue depth increases (waiting for 2-person lab), or both? The IR notes the congestion but does not ask which resource or timing constraint drives it. + +**Ramp scrap "not so bad" vs. "worse after big washdowns":** Relative comparison without quantities. The IR correctly flags scrap quantities as NOT YET ASKED but does not ask whether "not so bad" means operationally negligible (model can ignore) or consequential (model must represent). This creates ambiguity about whether scrap affects scheduling decisions or only costs. + +## Smallest next questions + +Ranked by downstream modeling impact: + +1. **Production rates (units/hour) for each product family × line combination, and hours per shift.** *Unlocks:* Accurate time modeling for any sequence; determines whether capacity constraints bind; enables testing alternative sequences for changeover reduction. + +2. **Complete changeover time matrix (tint→tint, all specialty combinations, whether times vary by line).** *Unlocks:* Accurate sequencing cost; determines whether family-grouping policy is optimal or can be refined; enables simulation of scheduler's wait-vs-washdown dilemma. + +3. **Initial state at Monday 8 AM (line status, WIP, QA queue, prior week carryover).** *Unlocks:* Simulation start; determines whether weekly planning is independent or coupled to prior state. + +4. **Line 2 jam frequency distribution and downtime duration distribution.** *Unlocks:* Realistic stochastic disruption modeling; determines whether jam recovery is occasional edge case or weekly planning driver; enables pre-planning reshuffles (stated objective). + +5. **Line 3 SKU qualification list (which tints not yet signed off, which specialties qualified).** *Unlocks:* Accurate line eligibility constraints; determines available recovery options when Line 2 jams; affects family-grouping feasibility. + +6. **Historical validation data availability (past demand books, run logs, changeover records, downtime logs) and credibility criteria.** *Unlocks:* Model calibration; determines whether model can be validated against observed performance or must rely on face validity; informs parametric vs. structural uncertainty. + +7. **Due date distribution in demand book and product family distribution.** *Unlocks:* Realistic demand scenarios for testing scheduling decisions; determines whether on-time delivery is hard or easy under typical load; affects Meridian priority policy impact. + +## Material that is difficult to find or use + +**Changeover time information** is split: white→white, white→tint, tint→white in "Process Spine" §5; ramp scrap qualitative description also in §5; tint→tint and specialty times noted as NOT YET ASKED in §5; changeover times listed again under "Quantities, Rates, Time: Known." A reader constructing a changeover time matrix must check both sections. + +**Line 2 jam disruption mechanics** appear in "Disruptions and Recovery" but jam frequency also appears in "Quantities, Rates, Time: NOT YET ASKED" as "every week or two → distribution?" A reader assessing whether jams are material to weekly planning must cross-reference. + +**Daily huddle** is introduced in "Process Spine" §3 as adjustment mechanism, mentioned again in "Disruptions and Recovery" as where scheduler learns maintenance estimate, but not indexed or cross-referenced. A reader asking "how does the scheduler learn about overnight events" must search or know to check process spine. + +**Product family definitions** (whites, tinted colors, specialty clears) appear in "Product Families and Distinctions" but are referenced throughout constraints, policies, and changeover sections without always restating what they mean. A reader unfamiliar with coatings might not immediately recognize "specialty clears" as a third family distinct from whites. + +**Line speeds** are stated relationally (Line 2 ~2x Line 1 on whites, Line 3 between L1 and L2 closer to L2) in "Resources: Production Lines" and repeated in "Quantities, Rates, Time: Known," but the VW-01 example ("800 units on Line 2 for whites took about half a shift") appears only in "Process Spine" §6. A reader trying to infer absolute rates must combine sections. + +## What can safely proceed from this IR + +**Conceptual model structure:** The three-line, multi-stage (mix→mill→tint/letdown→fill/pack), family-grouped, disruption-recovery model structure is clear. A downstream modeler can sketch a Petri net topology with places for lines, stages, QA, and shipping without inventing relations. + +**Qualitative constraint logic:** Meridian→Line 2 hard constraint, specialty clears→L1/L3 only, Line 3 SKU qualification (even without the list), and practiced family-grouping policy can be represented symbolically or as eligibility matrices. + +**Three-option jam recovery skeleton:** The decision tree for Line 2 jams (wait, move, scrap) with contextual factors (maintenance estimate, qualified line availability, urgency) is reconstructable as conditional branching logic. A parametric model can proceed with placeholder thresholds explicitly marked as assumptions. + +**Validation intent:** The four simulation questions and three success measures provide a clear objective function for model design. A modeler knows the model must count changeover hours, track on-time delivery, and support sequence testing—not, say, optimize inventory or labor costs. + +**Epistemic boundary:** The IR's discipline about NOT YET ASKED prevents a downstream modeler from silently inventing rates, changeover times, or failure distributions. The "Open Questions" section provides a checklist for conditional-model documentation. + +## What cannot safely proceed + +**Quantitative time modeling:** Without production rates (units/hour), fill-up times, shift hours, and the complete changeover time matrix, a model cannot accurately simulate "does it all fit in the week" or "how many changeover hours" or "better sequence reduces changeover time." Any constructed model would have to invent these values or leave them as named parameters requiring calibration. + +**Stochastic disruption modeling:** Without Line 2 jam frequency and duration distributions, QA failure rates, or materials shortage frequency, a model cannot realistically simulate recovery decisions or estimate on-time delivery risk. The "every week or two" phrase is too vague for sampling. + +**Initial conditions:** Without knowing Monday 8 AM line states, WIP, or QA queue, a simulation cannot start. The model could assume clean slate (all lines empty, no carryover) but this would be a load-bearing assumption requiring explicit documentation. + +**Line 3 eligibility decisions:** Without the SKU qualification list, a model cannot accurately simulate whether moving a jammed Line 2 run to Line 3 is feasible. A model could use a placeholder "X% of SKUs qualified" parameter, but this loses the SKU-specific structure the scheduler uses. + +**Validation against reality:** Without historical data (past demand books, run logs, downtime logs) or credibility criteria from the scheduler, a constructed model cannot be calibrated or validated. It could be internally consistent but not objective-credible for the stated decisions. + +**Wait-vs-washdown trade-off resolution:** The scheduler's stated dilemma cannot be resolved without knowing (a) whether "couple hours" for incoming white orders is a real intra-week arrival or a due-time phrase, (b) quantitative chang diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.cold-attempt-2.meta.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.cold-attempt-2.meta.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..fb713abcd2d --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.cold-attempt-2.meta.json @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ +{ + "schemaVersion": 1, + "protocolId": "prospective-runbook-v3", + "runId": "prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006", + "campaignFingerprint": "e93d1fd6b23a38b12201dee967c1b65e58b7c3d5724f57f1bedeb9413d9b76e1", + "comparisonTarget": { + "protocolId": "prospective-runbook-v1", + "outputNamespaceId": "vestera-prospective-baseline-v1", + "memberRunIds": [ + "runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-50-28-709Z-20a4817f", + "runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-56-34-754Z-4b75737c" + ], + "qualityPopulation": "valid-workpieces", + "runtimeAccounting": "reported-separately" + }, + "mode": "cold", + "attempt": 2, + "graderPromptPath": "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1/cold-ir-reviewer.md", + "graderPromptSha256": "ddd2620f17c5311a4a186b5bc229ae3f916d811e4aeb35f215ed7502c31fc8f5", + "inputSha256": { + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/opening-message.md": "84ec5faa5fd46699c008b3b2aad49eb9988b8c2ab039c8e147fdb077d562ef54", + "prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.ir.md": "99e4e201cdb4959c114495049e68d7f4d18bdc5c41a5b1d958001b4027fbe355" + }, + "requestSha256": "343059655cc2ec0a07c64190ed23ac9d2e0abc2fbe0f228e9725c8f52baf8db2", + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929", + "stopReason": "refusal", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 5054, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_creation": { + "ephemeral_5m_input_tokens": 0, + "ephemeral_1h_input_tokens": 0 + }, + "output_tokens": 4090, + "service_tier": "standard", + "inference_geo": "not_available" + }, + "reportPath": "/Users/lunelson/.herdr/worktrees/hash/bravo/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.cold-attempt-2.md", + "reportSha256": "529ec82ee2cf5a8acf7aaec49df3b78e0459f3b65f4def2f12f5d653a68d4b15", + "completedAt": "2026-09-02T11:58:23.235Z", + "nonce": "12c38abf-9cef-452a-a7f1-669b61320ca4" +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.cold.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.cold.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..ffc372d3646 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.cold.md @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +# Cold IR review — prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006 + +## Verdict +- Overall cold utility: **3.2 / 4** +- Downstream semantic readiness: **conditional** +- Confidence: **high** +- One-sentence diagnosis: A well-structured partial reconnaissance that clearly maps decision logic and process relationships while systematically tracking critical numerical gaps, enabling targeted completion but not yet supporting faithful construction. + +## Reconstructed model + +### Purpose and decisions +The scheduler needs to test weekly production schedules before execution, specifically evaluating: +- On-time delivery performance (especially for Meridian customer with penalty risk) +- Changeover hour consumption (management wants reduction) +- Alternative sequencing strategies to reduce changeover time +- Pre-planned responses when Line 2 filler fails + +The core decision trade-off: hold a line idle waiting for a same-family order versus washing down to run the next different-family order. + +### Boundary and horizon +One-week planning cycle starting Monday ~8 AM when ERP delivers 40-60 orders (SKU, quantity, due date), ending when orders ship after QA clearance (typically Friday, sometimes Monday). Inside boundary: scheduling, line allocation, production execution, QA hold, shipping. Outside boundary: ERP demand generation, materials supply (occasionally short but not detailed). + +### Operational flow +Orders flow through: demand book arrival → scheduler allocation → daily huddle adjustments → sequenced slot waiting → changeover → four-stage production (mix, mill, tint/letdown, fill/pack) with inter-stage holding tanks → QA hold (~4 hours whites, up to full day specialty) → ship. + +Production stages are sequential within each line. Holding tanks exist between mill and fill; Line 2's tank is "better" than Line 1's "tiny" tank, but capacities and throughput constraints are not stated. + +Three lines with different capabilities: +- Line 1: slow, runs everything (all product families), two shifts, reliable +- Line 2: ~2x Line 1 speed on whites, runs whites and tints only (not specialty clears), two shifts, Meridian whites mandatory here diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.cold.meta.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.cold.meta.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..15a1a60f3b9 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.cold.meta.json @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +{ + "schemaVersion": 1, + "protocolId": "prospective-runbook-v3", + "runId": "prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006", + "campaignFingerprint": "e93d1fd6b23a38b12201dee967c1b65e58b7c3d5724f57f1bedeb9413d9b76e1", + "comparisonTarget": { + "protocolId": "prospective-runbook-v1", + "outputNamespaceId": "vestera-prospective-baseline-v1", + "memberRunIds": [ + "runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-50-28-709Z-20a4817f", + "runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-56-34-754Z-4b75737c" + ], + "qualityPopulation": "valid-workpieces", + "runtimeAccounting": "reported-separately" + }, + "mode": "cold", + "graderPromptPath": "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1/cold-ir-reviewer.md", + "graderPromptSha256": "ddd2620f17c5311a4a186b5bc229ae3f916d811e4aeb35f215ed7502c31fc8f5", + "inputSha256": { + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/opening-message.md": "84ec5faa5fd46699c008b3b2aad49eb9988b8c2ab039c8e147fdb077d562ef54", + "prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.ir.md": "99e4e201cdb4959c114495049e68d7f4d18bdc5c41a5b1d958001b4027fbe355" + }, + "requestSha256": "343059655cc2ec0a07c64190ed23ac9d2e0abc2fbe0f228e9725c8f52baf8db2", + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929", + "stopReason": "refusal", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 5054, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_creation": { + "ephemeral_5m_input_tokens": 0, + "ephemeral_1h_input_tokens": 0 + }, + "output_tokens": 505, + "service_tier": "standard", + "inference_geo": "not_available" + }, + "reportPath": "/Users/lunelson/.herdr/worktrees/hash/bravo/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.cold.md", + "reportSha256": "bef461b282123fc39a10c7aa2f53c20517f837bb8b509199bd1913acbaa44993", + "completedAt": "2026-09-02T11:56:01.091Z", + "nonce": "fedb8c68-b6ad-43d3-836d-63bbc20753db" +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.ir.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.ir.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..30e1bc87ca5 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.ir.md @@ -0,0 +1,314 @@ +# Coatings Plant Production Scheduling Model + +## Model Purpose and Objectives + +**Primary simulation questions:** +- Are orders getting out on time? +- How many changeover hours are being consumed? +- Is there a smarter sequence that reduces changeover time? +- What is the best reshuffle when Line 2 goes down? + +**Intended decision support:** +- Test scheduling decisions before making them in production +- Evaluate trade-off: hold line idle waiting for same product-family order vs. wash down and run next order +- Pre-plan responses to Line 2 filler failures + +**Success measures:** +- On-time delivery (especially Meridian customer - risk of fines and delisting if late) +- Changeover hours (boss wants these reduced to recover capacity) +- Ability to recover lost time through better sequencing + +**Audience:** Master scheduler and management + +## Process Boundary and Triggers + +**Boundary:** +- Starts: Monday morning ~8 AM when demand book drops from ERP +- Ends: Orders ship after QA clearance (typically by Friday, sometimes slips to Monday) +- Inside boundary: Scheduling, line allocation, production execution, QA hold, shipping +- Outside boundary: ERP demand generation, materials supply (mentioned as occasionally short, not detailed) + +**Trigger:** +- Weekly demand book arrives Monday ~8 AM +- Spreadsheet with 40-60 orders per week (can reach 60 when busy) +- Each order: SKU, quantity, due date + +**Horizon:** One-week planning cycle (Monday-Friday) + +## Product Families and Distinctions + +**Product families** (operation treats these differently due to changeover costs): +- **Whites** — high volume +- **Tinted colors** — moderate volume +- **Specialty clears** — handful per week + +**Operational distinction:** Switching between families is expensive; scheduler groups by family when possible. + +## Resources: Production Lines + +### Line 1 +- **Description:** Old workhorse +- **Speed:** Slower (baseline) +- **Qualification:** Everything — all whites, all tints, all specialty clears +- **Availability:** Two shifts normally +- **Notes:** Reliable; tiny holding tank between mill and fill (backs things up) + +### Line 2 +- **Description:** Fast line +- **Speed:** About 2x Line 1 speed on whites ("that's where you really see it") +- **Qualification:** Whites and tints only; cannot run specialty clears (never piped for specialty resins) +- **Availability:** Two shifts normally +- **Special constraints:** Meridian whites MUST run on Line 2 (customer audited this line years ago) +- **Reliability issue:** Filler jams every week or two +- **Notes:** Better holding tank between mill and fill than Line 1 + +### Line 3 +- **Description:** Newest line +- **Speed:** Between Line 1 and Line 2, closer to Line 2's speed +- **Qualification:** Being qualified product-by-product; can run most whites, some tints (some tint SKUs not yet signed off), and specialties (qualified more recently) +- **Availability:** Day shift only unless overtime approved +- **Notes:** Still expanding qualification list + +**NOT YET ASKED:** Specific list of which SKUs are qualified on Line 3. + +## Process Spine: One Order From Demand Book to Ship + +**Source case:** Meridian order VW-01 (high-volume interior white), 800 units, due Friday + +### 1. Demand book arrival (Monday ~8 AM) +Order appears as line in spreadsheet: SKU, quantity, due date. + +### 2. Scheduler builds allocation sheet +- **Activity:** Match orders to lines, sequence them +- **Performer:** Master scheduler +- **Approach:** Group orders by product family when possible (minimize expensive family-switches) +- **Constraints applied:** + - Meridian whites → Line 2 (mandatory) + - Specialty clears → Line 1 or Line 3 only + - Line 3 → only if SKU qualified and capacity available +- **Time estimation:** Quantity ÷ rate + fill-up time + changeover time +- **Check:** Does it all fit in the week? + +**NOT YET ASKED:** Specific rates (units/hour) by product-line combination. Scheduler has these "in my head — or in the sheet." Fill-up times by line or product. + +### 3. Daily floor huddle (every morning 7:30 AM) +- **Participants:** Scheduler, line leads, maintenance, QA +- **Topics:** What finished overnight, what's running now, any problems +- **Activity:** Scheduler adjusts schedule on the fly (line jams, batch QA holds, materials slip) +- **Execution:** Verbal adjustments, people go execute + +### 4. Order waits for sequenced slot +**Example:** VW-01 slotted for Tuesday afternoon, after another white finishes on Line 2. + +### 5. Changeover +**Example case (white-to-white on Line 2):** Quick rinse, 20-30 minutes. Crew cleans residual from last batch, flushes system. + +**Known changeover times:** +- White → white: 20-30 minutes (quick rinse) +- White → tint: ~45 minutes +- Tint → white: 3 hours (full washdown; pigment carryover ruins white batch) + +**NOT YET ASKED:** +- Tint → tint changeover time +- Specialty clear changeover times (to/from whites, tints, other clears) +- Whether changeover times vary by line + +**Ramp scrap:** First few units after any changeover don't meet spec (residual from rinse, concentrations stabilizing). Scrapped or reworked. Worse after big washdowns (tint → white). "Not so bad" after quick rinse. + +**NOT YET ASKED:** Scrap quantities by changeover type. Quality tracks scrap as monthly percentage; scheduler does not have per-changeover figures. + +### 6. Production run +**Stages (in sequence):** +1. **Mix:** Blend base resin with additives in mix tank +2. **Mill:** Grind to particle size +3. **Tint and letdown:** For whites, mostly thinning to spec (no pigment) +4. **Fill and pack:** Into cans, labeled, palletized + +**Holding tanks:** Between stages. Mill can keep feeding while fill catches up or vice versa. Line 2 tank (between mill and fill) is better than Line 1's tiny tank. + +**NOT YET ASKED:** Holding tank capacities, whether they constrain throughput. + +**Run time example:** 800 units on Line 2 for whites took "about half a shift" (quantity at Line 2 rate + fill-up time + ramp settling after changeover). + +**NOT YET ASKED:** Hours per shift. Specific production rates. + +### 7. QA hold +- **Duration:** ~4 hours for whites; sometimes full day for specialty +- **Activity:** Lab pulls samples, runs tests +- **Resource:** 2-person lab +- **Congestion:** Backs up end of week + +**NOT YET ASKED:** QA failure rate, what happens when batch fails QA (mentioned "adjust and retest" as occasional issue). + +### 8. Ship +Once QA clears, order ships. + +**Example timeline:** Run Tuesday afternoon, finish Tuesday night, clear QA Wednesday morning, ship Wednesday (well ahead of Friday due date). + +**Reality qualifier (from scheduler):** "That's the clean version. Reality is messier — filler on Line 2 jams every week or two, materials occasionally short, QA finds something off and we have to adjust and retest." + +## Disruptions and Recovery + +### Line 2 filler jam (occurs every week or two) + +**Last occurrence (2-3 weeks ago):** +- Line 2 mid-run on VW-03 (contractor-grade flat white), filler jammed ~6 AM +- Cause: Bag broke in hopper, made a mess, whole thing locked up +- Maintenance estimate at huddle: "at least a couple hours" +- Actual duration: "more like half a shift" + +**Three options when line goes down mid-run:** + +1. **Wait it out** + - When: Maintenance says 1-2 hours and run almost done + - Product already in tanks, only losing time + +2. **Move rest of run to another line** + - Cost: Lose fill-up already paid, redo setup on new line + - Prerequisites: New line must be free AND qualified for the product + - When: Line will be down half a shift or more AND capacity available elsewhere + +3. **Scrap in-progress, restart whole run later** + - When: Almost never; only if batch already off-spec or line down for days + - Reason: Too wasteful + +**Decision factors (scheduler's account):** +- Maintenance time estimate +- Availability of another qualified line +- Whether moving would "screw up something more urgent" +- "Gut feel" +- If Meridian order with tight due date → more aggressive about moving +- If small distributor order that can slip a few days → wait + +**NOT YET ASKED:** +- Frequency distribution of Line 2 jams +- Duration distribution of Line 2 downtime +- Frequency and nature of "materials occasionally short" +- What happens to work already in holding tanks when line stops mid-run + +### Other disruptions mentioned but not detailed: +- Batch fails QA hold → adjust and retest (frequency and impact not asked) +- Materials slip (frequency, which materials, advance warning not asked) + +## Scheduling Constraints and Policies + +### Hard constraints (from scheduler account): +- Meridian whites MUST go on Line 2 (customer requirement, audited that line) +- Specialty clears can ONLY go on Lines 1 or 3 (Line 2 not piped for specialty resins) +- Line 3 SKU-by-SKU qualification (some tints not yet signed off) + +### Practiced policies: +- Group orders by product family when possible (minimize changeover cost) +- Prefer white-to-white sequences over white-tint-white (avoid 3-hour washdown) +- When contention exists: Meridian orders get priority (due to penalty/delisting risk) + +### Trade-off under uncertainty (scheduler's stated dilemma): +- If Line 2 finishing a white and another white order "coming in a couple hours," hold line idle vs. wash down to tint? +- Scheduler "thinks waiting sometimes makes sense" but cannot prove it +- Boss wants fewer changeover hours + +**NOT YET ASKED:** +- How "couple hours" or other wait-time thresholds factor into practiced decision +- Whether orders actually arrive during the week or all appear Monday in demand book +- Whether partial orders or rush orders ever interrupt the plan + +## Quantities, Rates, Time + +**Known:** +- Demand book: 40-60 orders/week +- Example order: 800 units +- Line 2 speed: ~2x Line 1 on whites +- Line 3 speed: between L1 and L2, closer to L2 +- Line 2 on 800-unit white: "about half a shift" +- Changeover times: see Process Spine section 5 +- QA hold: ~4 hours whites, up to full day specialty +- Shifts: Lines 1 and 2 run two shifts; Line 3 day shift only (unless overtime) + +**NOT YET ASKED:** +- Specific units/hour rates by product-line combination +- Hours per shift +- Fill-up time by line or product +- Ramp scrap quantities +- Distribution of order sizes +- Distribution of due dates within the week +- Product family distribution (what % of weekly demand is whites vs. tints vs. specialty) +- Whether batches have minimum or maximum sizes +- Line 2 jam frequency (every week or two → distribution?) +- Line 2 downtime duration (couple hours to half shift → distribution?) + +## Initial Conditions and State + +**NOT YET ASKED:** +- What state are lines in at Monday 8 AM when demand book arrives? (Clean? Mid-run? Last product family run?) +- Are there any orders in progress or in QA hold from prior week? +- Initial inventory or work-in-process? + +## Validation and Evidence Sources + +**Validation intent (from scheduler):** +- Model should show on-time delivery performance +- Model should count changeover hours +- Model should allow testing alternative sequences +- Model should support pre-planning reshuffles when Line 2 fails + +**NOT YET ASKED:** +- What observation, replay, or comparison would make the model credible enough to use? +- What historical data is available (past demand books, actual run logs, changeover records, downtime logs)? +- Are actual rates, changeover times, QA hold times recorded somewhere, or only in scheduler's head/sheet? + +## Open Questions and Unresolved Material + +### Critical for construction but not yet asked: +1. Specific production rates (units/hour) for product-line combinations +2. Changeover times: tint-to-tint, all specialty combinations, whether times vary by line +3. Fill-up times +4. Ramp scrap quantities by changeover type +5. Hours per shift +6. Line 3 SKU qualification details +7. Initial state at start of simulation week +8. Whether orders can be split across lines or must run whole on one line +9. Holding tank capacities and constraints +10. Frequency distributions: Line 2 jams, downtime durations, QA failures, materials shortages +11. Due date distribution in demand book +12. Product family distribution in demand book +13. Validation: what would make model credible, what historical data exists + +### Consequential unknowns flagged by scheduler: +- Exact scrap per changeover type (Quality has monthly %, scheduler doesn't have detail) +- Exact rates (scheduler has them "in my head — or in the sheet" but not stated in interview) + +### Deliberate simplifications or omissions: +- None explicitly proposed yet + +### Assumptions: +- None explicitly introduced yet + +### Conflicts or corrections: +- None yet + +### Contextual variations noted but not fully explored: +- Line 2 downtime: "couple hours" vs. "more like half a shift" (context: initial estimate vs. actual) +- QA hold: "about 4 hours" for whites, "sometimes full day" for specialty, "backs up end of week" (context-dependent duration) +- Scheduler's practiced policy varies by customer urgency and due date pressure + +## Target Representation Notes + +**Target formalism:** Petri-net-style process model (specific format not known to scheduler; "I'm not the modelling person") + +**Construction not yet attempted.** No Petrinaut tools invoked. No net elements defined. + +**When construction begins, will need to infer:** +- How to represent line eligibility constraints +- How to represent scheduler's practiced priority rules under contention +- How to represent three-option recovery logic when Line 2 fails +- How to represent holding tanks and multi-stage production flow +- Whether to model individual units, batches, or orders as tokens +- How to represent ramp scrap and QA hold +- How to represent calendar (shift boundaries, day shift only for Line 3, week boundary) + +**Consequential gaps that block faithful construction:** +- Missing rates prevent accurate time modeling +- Missing changeover time matrix prevents accurate sequencing cost +- Missing failure/disruption frequency distributions prevent realistic stochastic behavior +- Missing initial state prevents simulation start +- Missing validation criteria prevent assessing whether constructed model is fit for purpose diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..91caf48110f --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.json @@ -0,0 +1,796 @@ +{ + "schemaVersion": 1, + "protocolId": "prospective-runbook-v3", + "outputNamespaceId": "vestera-architecture-candidate-v3", + "comparisonTarget": { + "protocolId": "prospective-runbook-v1", + "outputNamespaceId": "vestera-prospective-baseline-v1", + "memberRunIds": [ + "runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-50-28-709Z-20a4817f", + "runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-56-34-754Z-4b75737c" + ], + "qualityPopulation": "valid-workpieces", + "runtimeAccounting": "reported-separately" + }, + "campaignFingerprint": "e93d1fd6b23a38b12201dee967c1b65e58b7c3d5724f57f1bedeb9413d9b76e1", + "replication": 1, + "runId": "prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006", + "status": "completed", + "startedAt": "2026-09-02T11:41:53.281Z", + "completedAt": "2026-09-02T11:48:14.368Z", + "interviewerModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "expertModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "hardStop": 8, + "latencyStopMs": 180000, + "interviewTurns": 8, + "stopReason": "hard-stop", + "finalizationMessage": "[Evaluation stop instruction; not expert evidence] The interview turn budget is exhausted. Emit the full current Markdown runbook IR in one `runbook-ir` fenced block. Do not ask another question, construct the Petri net, or read construction resources. Preserve every unresolved unknown, not-yet-asked item, declined or deferred item, assumption, conflict, correction, contextual coexistence, omission, and loss.", + "logicalTurnDurationsMs": [ + 21495, 14356, 22472, 11494, 25056, 7855, 22404, 11512, 139077 + ], + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 8890, + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": null, + "observedModelSource": "unavailable", + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "providerStopReason": null, + "inputTokens": 10, + "outputTokens": 280, + "totalTokens": 2766, + "cost": 0.013515 + }, + { + "durationMs": 4533, + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": null, + "observedModelSource": "unavailable", + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "providerStopReason": null, + "inputTokens": 12, + "outputTokens": 248, + "totalTokens": 4245, + "cost": 0.01015755 + }, + { + "durationMs": 8072, + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": null, + "observedModelSource": "unavailable", + "stopReason": "stop", + "providerStopReason": null, + "inputTokens": 14, + "outputTokens": 250, + "totalTokens": 10891, + "cost": 0.029894999999999998 + }, + { + "durationMs": 14356, + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": null, + "observedModelSource": "unavailable", + "stopReason": "stop", + "providerStopReason": null, + "inputTokens": 10, + "outputTokens": 489, + "totalTokens": 11268, + "cost": 0.03920655 + }, + { + "durationMs": 22472, + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": null, + "observedModelSource": "unavailable", + "stopReason": "stop", + "providerStopReason": null, + "inputTokens": 10, + "outputTokens": 597, + "totalTokens": 11992, + "cost": 0.014525699999999999 + }, + { + "durationMs": 11494, + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": null, + "observedModelSource": "unavailable", + "stopReason": "stop", + "providerStopReason": null, + "inputTokens": 10, + "outputTokens": 420, + "totalTokens": 12301, + "cost": 0.011567999999999998 + }, + { + "durationMs": 25056, + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": null, + "observedModelSource": "unavailable", + "stopReason": "stop", + "providerStopReason": null, + "inputTokens": 10, + "outputTokens": 663, + "totalTokens": 12882, + "cost": 0.0148038 + }, + { + "durationMs": 7855, + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": null, + "observedModelSource": "unavailable", + "stopReason": "stop", + "providerStopReason": null, + "inputTokens": 10, + "outputTokens": 221, + "totalTokens": 12830, + "cost": 0.0084702 + }, + { + "durationMs": 22404, + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": null, + "observedModelSource": "unavailable", + "stopReason": "stop", + "providerStopReason": null, + "inputTokens": 10, + "outputTokens": 632, + "totalTokens": 13664, + "cost": 0.014875950000000002 + }, + { + "durationMs": 11512, + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": null, + "observedModelSource": "unavailable", + "stopReason": "stop", + "providerStopReason": null, + "inputTokens": 10, + "outputTokens": 397, + "totalTokens": 13862, + "cost": 0.01151535 + }, + { + "durationMs": 139077, + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": null, + "observedModelSource": "unavailable", + "stopReason": "stop", + "providerStopReason": null, + "inputTokens": 10, + "outputTokens": 5399, + "totalTokens": 19075, + "cost": 0.08584275 + } + ], + "expertUsage": { + "calls": 7, + "inputTokens": 28351, + "outputTokens": 2528, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0 + }, + "expertCalls": [ + { + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929", + "observedModelSource": "provider-response", + "stopReason": "end_turn" + }, + { + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929", + "observedModelSource": "provider-response", + "stopReason": "end_turn" + }, + { + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929", + "observedModelSource": "provider-response", + "stopReason": "refusal" + }, + { + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929", + "observedModelSource": "provider-response", + "stopReason": "end_turn" + }, + { + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929", + "observedModelSource": "provider-response", + "stopReason": "refusal" + }, + { + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929", + "observedModelSource": "provider-response", + "stopReason": "end_turn" + }, + { + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929", + "observedModelSource": "provider-response", + "stopReason": "end_turn" + } + ], + "expertMessages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": "I'll help you develop a simulation model of your scheduling operation. Let me start by loading the modeling framework, then we'll talk through how your operation works.\nGood. Now let's talk about how your operation actually works.\n\nBefore we dive into the details, help me understand what you're trying to accomplish with this simulation. **What specific scheduling decisions do you need to test, and what would you be looking for to tell whether a decision is working well or poorly?**" + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "*(settles into a chair, coffee mug in hand)*\n\nThe main thing? I need to get the demand book out on time — that's the weekly order list from ERP. Late orders are what gets me in trouble, especially with Meridian. They're our big retail chain customer, and they'll fine us and threaten to delist if we're late. So that's non-negotiable.\n\nBut beyond that... *(gestures vaguely)* I'm constantly making these gut calls about whether it's worth holding a line idle to wait for an order in the same product family, versus just washing down and running whatever's next. Like, if I've got Line 2 finishing a white and I know there's another white order coming in a couple hours, do I sit the line or do I wash it down to tint and pay three hours for that changeover? I *think* waiting sometimes makes sense, but I can't prove it, and my boss wants fewer changeover hours eating up capacity.\n\nAnd when a line goes down at six in the morning — which happens, especially the filler on Line 2 — I'm re-juggling the whole sheet at the huddle, and it's all improvisation. It'd be nice to know ahead of time what the best reshuffle actually is.\n\n*(pauses)*\n\nSo I guess what I'm looking for is: are we getting orders out on time, how many changeover hours are we actually burning, and whether there's a smarter way to sequence things that claws back some of that lost time. Does that make sense?" + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "That makes perfect sense. On-time delivery for Meridian and the rest of the book, changeover hours burning capacity, and being able to look ahead when a line goes down. Those are concrete things I can work with.\n\nLet me follow a typical case so I understand how this actually flows. **Walk me through what happened last week, or a recent week you remember — starting from when the demand book shows up. What arrives, what do you do with it, and how does an order actually get from that list onto a line and out the door?**" + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "*(leans back, thinking)*\n\nOkay, so... Monday morning, usually around 8 AM, the demand book drops from ERP. It's a spreadsheet — maybe 40, 50 orders that week, could be 60 if we're busy. Each line is an SKU, how many units, and a due date. Most of it's whites — that's our volume — then some tinted colours, and usually a handful of specialty clears.\n\nI take that list and I build the sheet. That's my Excel allocation — I'm matching orders to lines and figuring out the sequence. I group orders by product family when I can, because switching families is expensive. White to tint is maybe 45 minutes, but tint back to white? Full washdown, three hours, because any pigment carryover ruins a white batch. So I'm trying to keep whites together, tints together.\n\nI also know some products can only run certain places. Meridian whites always go on Line 2 — it's faster, and they actually audited that line years ago, so that's where they want their stuff made. Specialty clears only run on Lines 1 and 3; Line 2 was never piped for those resins.\n\n*(sips coffee)*\n\nOnce I've got the sequence roughed out, I'm estimating times. Each product-line combo has a rate in my head — or in the sheet, really. So I take the quantity, divide by the rate, add some fill-up time, and then I'm adding changeover time on top. That gives me a rough idea if it all fits in the week.\n\nThen the week starts running. Every morning at 7:30 there's a floor huddle — me, the line leads, maintenance, QA. We talk about what finished overnight, what's running now, any problems. And I'm adjusting on the fly. A line jams, a batch fails QA hold, materials slip... I'm moving stuff around verbally, and people go execute.\n\nOrders finish, sit in QA hold for a few hours — maybe four, longer for specialty — then they ship. By Friday afternoon we've usually cleared most of it. Sometimes something slips to Monday.\n\nDoes that give you the picture?" + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "Good, that's giving me the shape of it. Now let me follow one order all the way through so I understand what actually happens to it, not just the planning.\n\n**Pick one order from last week or the week before — maybe a Meridian white, since those matter most. From the moment it's a line on that Monday spreadsheet to the moment it ships, what has to happen to it, and what does each step need or wait for?**" + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "*(thinks for a moment)*\n\nAlright, let's say... Meridian order for VW-01, our high-volume interior white. 800 units, due Friday. That's on the sheet for Line 2, naturally.\n\nSo the order goes into my sequence — let's say I slot it for Tuesday afternoon, after we finish a run of another white that's already on the line. That's good because it's white-to-white, so the changeover is just a quick rinse, maybe 20, 30 minutes. The crew cleans out the residual from the last batch, flushes the system.\n\nOnce the line's clean, they start the run. First stage is **mix** — they're blending the base resin with additives in the mix tank. Then it moves to the **mill**, where it gets ground down to the right particle size. From there it goes to **tint and letdown** — for a white that's mostly just thinning it to spec, no pigment. Then finally **fill and pack** — into cans, labeled, palletized.\n\n*(gestures as if tracing the flow)*\n\nThere are holding tanks between those stages, so the mill can keep feeding while fill is catching up, or vice versa. Though... *(pauses)* the tank between mill and fill on Line 1 is tiny and it backs things up, but Line 2's is better.\n\nThe run takes... I don't know, with Line 2 on whites, maybe half a shift? That's 800 units at Line 2's rate plus the fill-up time and a bit of ramp while the line settles after the changeover. First few units after any changeover are scrap — ramp sc" + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "*(let them finish the thought about scrap)* — go on, you were saying first few units are scrap?" + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "*(nods)*\n\nYeah, ramp scrap. First few units after any changeover, the line's still settling — residual from the rinse, concentrations stabilizing, that kind of thing. Those units don't meet spec, so they get scrapped or reworked. It's worse after the big washdowns, like tint back to white. After a quick rinse it's not so bad.\n\n*(shrugs)*\n\nQuality tracks scrap as a monthly percentage, so I couldn't tell you exactly how much per changeover type. It's just... part of the cost of switching.\n\nAnyway, once the 800 units come off the line, they go into **QA hold**. The lab pulls samples, runs tests — usually takes about four hours for whites. Specialty sits longer, sometimes a full day. The lab's only two people, and end of week it backs up.\n\nOnce QA clears it, it ships. So for that Meridian order — if it runs Tuesday afternoon, finishes Tuesday night, clears QA Wednesday morning — it's out the door Wednesday, well ahead of Friday.\n\n*(takes another sip of coffee)*\n\nThat's the clean version, anyway. Reality is messier — the filler on Line 2 jams every week or two, materials occasionally short, QA finds something off and we have to adjust and retest. But that's the basic flow." + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "Good, that's helpful. You mentioned the filler on Line 2 jams every week or two, and when a line goes down at six in the morning you're reshuffling at the huddle. \n\n**What actually happened the last time Line 2 went down? What was supposed to be running, what did you do with it, and where did you move things to?**" + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "*(grimaces slightly)*\n\nOh, that was... two weeks ago? Maybe three. Line 2 was in the middle of a big white run — I think it was VW-03, the contractor-grade flat — and the filler jammed around 6 AM. Bag broke in the hopper, made a mess, whole thing locked up.\n\nAt the huddle, maintenance said it'd be at least a couple hours to clear and reset. Turned out to be more like half a shift, but we didn't know that yet.\n\n*(leans forward, gesturing)*\n\nSo I had to figure out what to do with the rest of that run. Line 1 was already on a tint — couldn't just stop that mid-batch. Line 3 was free, but... *(pauses)* Line 3 is slower on whites, and honestly I hate moving a half-finished run because you lose the setup, you're re-doing the fill-up, it's inefficient. So I decided to just wait it out on Line 2, let maintenance fix it, finish the run there.\n\nBut that pushed everything else back. I had a tint order that was supposed to start on Line 2 that afternoon — moved that to Line 1 the next morning instead, which meant Line 1 had to wash down from tint to... no, wait, it was" + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "— it's fine, you don't need to reconstruct every move from that day. Let me ask it differently:\n\n**When Line 2 goes down mid-run like that, what are your actual options? Can you pause the run and restart it later on the same line, can you move it to another line, do you have to scrap what's in progress? And what decides which option you pick?**" + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "*(nods, relieved to speak generally)*\n\nOkay, yeah — so if a line goes down mid-run, I've basically got three options.\n\n**One:** Wait it out. If maintenance says it's going to be an hour or two, and the run's almost done anyway, I just let the line sit and finish it when it's back up. The product's already in the tanks, you're not losing much except time.\n\n**Two:** Move the rest of the run to another line. That's a pain — you lose the fill-up you already paid, you're re-doing the setup on the new line, and you need that line to be free *and* qualified for the product. But if Line 2's going to be down half a shift or more and I've got capacity elsewhere, sometimes I'll do it.\n\n**Three:** Scrap what's in progress and restart the whole run later. I almost never do that unless something's really wrong — like if QA says the batch is already off-spec, or the line's going to be down for days. Too wasteful.\n\n*(leans back)*\n\nWhat decides? Mostly how long maintenance thinks it'll take, and whether I've got another line that can take it without screwing up something more urgent. And honestly... *(shrugs)* gut feel. If it's a Meridian order and the due date's tight, I'm more aggressive about moving it. If it's a small distributor order that can slip a few days, I'll wait." + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "Alright, so you've got three lines with different capabilities. Let me make sure I understand the constraints.\n\n**You mentioned Line 2 is faster for whites and it's the only one qualified for Meridian. What are the actual differences between your three lines — what can run where, and how do their speeds compare?**" + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "*(settles in)*\n\nOkay, so — **Line 1** is the old workhorse. It's slower, but it's qualified for everything. All the whites, all the tints, and all the specialty clears. It's the reliable one, but you pay for that in speed.\n\n**Line 2** is the fast line. It's about twice as fast as Line 1, at least on whites — that's where you really see it. That's why all the Meridian whites go there; the volume needs that speed. But Line 2 was never piped for the specialty resins, so it can't run the clears at all. Whites and tints only.\n\n**Line 3** is the newest. It's quick — somewhere between the two, maybe closer to Line 2's speed. But it's still being qualified product by product. It can run most of the whites and some of the tints, but there are still a couple tint SKUs that haven't been signed off yet. And it does specialties — that's newer, but it's qualified for them.\n\n*(pauses, thinking)*\n\nOh, and Line 3 only runs day shift unless we get overtime approved. Lines 1 and 2 run two shifts normally.\n\nSo if I've got a big white order, I want Line 2. Specialty, it's Line 1 or 3. And if Line 2's jammed and I need to move a white... Line 1 or Line 3, depending on what's free and whether Line 3 is actually qualified for that particular SKU.\n\nDoes that cover it?" + } + ], + "toolNames": ["activate_skill", "read_skill_resource"], + "resourcePaths": [ + "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/universal-elicitation.md", + "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/profile.md" + ], + "ir": "# Coatings Plant Production Scheduling Model\n\n## Model Purpose and Objectives\n\n**Primary simulation questions:**\n- Are orders getting out on time?\n- How many changeover hours are being consumed?\n- Is there a smarter sequence that reduces changeover time?\n- What is the best reshuffle when Line 2 goes down?\n\n**Intended decision support:**\n- Test scheduling decisions before making them in production\n- Evaluate trade-off: hold line idle waiting for same product-family order vs. wash down and run next order\n- Pre-plan responses to Line 2 filler failures\n\n**Success measures:**\n- On-time delivery (especially Meridian customer - risk of fines and delisting if late)\n- Changeover hours (boss wants these reduced to recover capacity)\n- Ability to recover lost time through better sequencing\n\n**Audience:** Master scheduler and management\n\n## Process Boundary and Triggers\n\n**Boundary:**\n- Starts: Monday morning ~8 AM when demand book drops from ERP\n- Ends: Orders ship after QA clearance (typically by Friday, sometimes slips to Monday)\n- Inside boundary: Scheduling, line allocation, production execution, QA hold, shipping\n- Outside boundary: ERP demand generation, materials supply (mentioned as occasionally short, not detailed)\n\n**Trigger:** \n- Weekly demand book arrives Monday ~8 AM\n- Spreadsheet with 40-60 orders per week (can reach 60 when busy)\n- Each order: SKU, quantity, due date\n\n**Horizon:** One-week planning cycle (Monday-Friday)\n\n## Product Families and Distinctions\n\n**Product families** (operation treats these differently due to changeover costs):\n- **Whites** — high volume\n- **Tinted colors** — moderate volume\n- **Specialty clears** — handful per week\n\n**Operational distinction:** Switching between families is expensive; scheduler groups by family when possible.\n\n## Resources: Production Lines\n\n### Line 1\n- **Description:** Old workhorse\n- **Speed:** Slower (baseline)\n- **Qualification:** Everything — all whites, all tints, all specialty clears\n- **Availability:** Two shifts normally\n- **Notes:** Reliable; tiny holding tank between mill and fill (backs things up)\n\n### Line 2\n- **Description:** Fast line\n- **Speed:** About 2x Line 1 speed on whites (\"that's where you really see it\")\n- **Qualification:** Whites and tints only; cannot run specialty clears (never piped for specialty resins)\n- **Availability:** Two shifts normally\n- **Special constraints:** Meridian whites MUST run on Line 2 (customer audited this line years ago)\n- **Reliability issue:** Filler jams every week or two\n- **Notes:** Better holding tank between mill and fill than Line 1\n\n### Line 3\n- **Description:** Newest line\n- **Speed:** Between Line 1 and Line 2, closer to Line 2's speed\n- **Qualification:** Being qualified product-by-product; can run most whites, some tints (some tint SKUs not yet signed off), and specialties (qualified more recently)\n- **Availability:** Day shift only unless overtime approved\n- **Notes:** Still expanding qualification list\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:** Specific list of which SKUs are qualified on Line 3.\n\n## Process Spine: One Order From Demand Book to Ship\n\n**Source case:** Meridian order VW-01 (high-volume interior white), 800 units, due Friday\n\n### 1. Demand book arrival (Monday ~8 AM)\nOrder appears as line in spreadsheet: SKU, quantity, due date.\n\n### 2. Scheduler builds allocation sheet\n- **Activity:** Match orders to lines, sequence them\n- **Performer:** Master scheduler\n- **Approach:** Group orders by product family when possible (minimize expensive family-switches)\n- **Constraints applied:**\n - Meridian whites → Line 2 (mandatory)\n - Specialty clears → Line 1 or Line 3 only\n - Line 3 → only if SKU qualified and capacity available\n- **Time estimation:** Quantity ÷ rate + fill-up time + changeover time\n- **Check:** Does it all fit in the week?\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:** Specific rates (units/hour) by product-line combination. Scheduler has these \"in my head — or in the sheet.\" Fill-up times by line or product.\n\n### 3. Daily floor huddle (every morning 7:30 AM)\n- **Participants:** Scheduler, line leads, maintenance, QA\n- **Topics:** What finished overnight, what's running now, any problems\n- **Activity:** Scheduler adjusts schedule on the fly (line jams, batch QA holds, materials slip)\n- **Execution:** Verbal adjustments, people go execute\n\n### 4. Order waits for sequenced slot\n**Example:** VW-01 slotted for Tuesday afternoon, after another white finishes on Line 2.\n\n### 5. Changeover\n**Example case (white-to-white on Line 2):** Quick rinse, 20-30 minutes. Crew cleans residual from last batch, flushes system.\n\n**Known changeover times:**\n- White → white: 20-30 minutes (quick rinse)\n- White → tint: ~45 minutes\n- Tint → white: 3 hours (full washdown; pigment carryover ruins white batch)\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:**\n- Tint → tint changeover time\n- Specialty clear changeover times (to/from whites, tints, other clears)\n- Whether changeover times vary by line\n\n**Ramp scrap:** First few units after any changeover don't meet spec (residual from rinse, concentrations stabilizing). Scrapped or reworked. Worse after big washdowns (tint → white). \"Not so bad\" after quick rinse.\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:** Scrap quantities by changeover type. Quality tracks scrap as monthly percentage; scheduler does not have per-changeover figures.\n\n### 6. Production run\n**Stages (in sequence):**\n1. **Mix:** Blend base resin with additives in mix tank\n2. **Mill:** Grind to particle size\n3. **Tint and letdown:** For whites, mostly thinning to spec (no pigment)\n4. **Fill and pack:** Into cans, labeled, palletized\n\n**Holding tanks:** Between stages. Mill can keep feeding while fill catches up or vice versa. Line 2 tank (between mill and fill) is better than Line 1's tiny tank.\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:** Holding tank capacities, whether they constrain throughput.\n\n**Run time example:** 800 units on Line 2 for whites took \"about half a shift\" (quantity at Line 2 rate + fill-up time + ramp settling after changeover).\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:** Hours per shift. Specific production rates.\n\n### 7. QA hold\n- **Duration:** ~4 hours for whites; sometimes full day for specialty\n- **Activity:** Lab pulls samples, runs tests\n- **Resource:** 2-person lab\n- **Congestion:** Backs up end of week\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:** QA failure rate, what happens when batch fails QA (mentioned \"adjust and retest\" as occasional issue).\n\n### 8. Ship\nOnce QA clears, order ships.\n\n**Example timeline:** Run Tuesday afternoon, finish Tuesday night, clear QA Wednesday morning, ship Wednesday (well ahead of Friday due date).\n\n**Reality qualifier (from scheduler):** \"That's the clean version. Reality is messier — filler on Line 2 jams every week or two, materials occasionally short, QA finds something off and we have to adjust and retest.\"\n\n## Disruptions and Recovery\n\n### Line 2 filler jam (occurs every week or two)\n\n**Last occurrence (2-3 weeks ago):**\n- Line 2 mid-run on VW-03 (contractor-grade flat white), filler jammed ~6 AM\n- Cause: Bag broke in hopper, made a mess, whole thing locked up\n- Maintenance estimate at huddle: \"at least a couple hours\"\n- Actual duration: \"more like half a shift\"\n\n**Three options when line goes down mid-run:**\n\n1. **Wait it out**\n - When: Maintenance says 1-2 hours and run almost done\n - Product already in tanks, only losing time\n \n2. **Move rest of run to another line**\n - Cost: Lose fill-up already paid, redo setup on new line\n - Prerequisites: New line must be free AND qualified for the product\n - When: Line will be down half a shift or more AND capacity available elsewhere\n \n3. **Scrap in-progress, restart whole run later**\n - When: Almost never; only if batch already off-spec or line down for days\n - Reason: Too wasteful\n\n**Decision factors (scheduler's account):**\n- Maintenance time estimate\n- Availability of another qualified line\n- Whether moving would \"screw up something more urgent\"\n- \"Gut feel\"\n- If Meridian order with tight due date → more aggressive about moving\n- If small distributor order that can slip a few days → wait\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:**\n- Frequency distribution of Line 2 jams\n- Duration distribution of Line 2 downtime\n- Frequency and nature of \"materials occasionally short\"\n- What happens to work already in holding tanks when line stops mid-run\n\n### Other disruptions mentioned but not detailed:\n- Batch fails QA hold → adjust and retest (frequency and impact not asked)\n- Materials slip (frequency, which materials, advance warning not asked)\n\n## Scheduling Constraints and Policies\n\n### Hard constraints (from scheduler account):\n- Meridian whites MUST go on Line 2 (customer requirement, audited that line)\n- Specialty clears can ONLY go on Lines 1 or 3 (Line 2 not piped for specialty resins)\n- Line 3 SKU-by-SKU qualification (some tints not yet signed off)\n\n### Practiced policies:\n- Group orders by product family when possible (minimize changeover cost)\n- Prefer white-to-white sequences over white-tint-white (avoid 3-hour washdown)\n- When contention exists: Meridian orders get priority (due to penalty/delisting risk)\n\n### Trade-off under uncertainty (scheduler's stated dilemma):\n- If Line 2 finishing a white and another white order \"coming in a couple hours,\" hold line idle vs. wash down to tint?\n- Scheduler \"thinks waiting sometimes makes sense\" but cannot prove it\n- Boss wants fewer changeover hours\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:**\n- How \"couple hours\" or other wait-time thresholds factor into practiced decision\n- Whether orders actually arrive during the week or all appear Monday in demand book\n- Whether partial orders or rush orders ever interrupt the plan\n\n## Quantities, Rates, Time\n\n**Known:**\n- Demand book: 40-60 orders/week\n- Example order: 800 units\n- Line 2 speed: ~2x Line 1 on whites\n- Line 3 speed: between L1 and L2, closer to L2\n- Line 2 on 800-unit white: \"about half a shift\"\n- Changeover times: see Process Spine section 5\n- QA hold: ~4 hours whites, up to full day specialty\n- Shifts: Lines 1 and 2 run two shifts; Line 3 day shift only (unless overtime)\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:**\n- Specific units/hour rates by product-line combination\n- Hours per shift\n- Fill-up time by line or product\n- Ramp scrap quantities\n- Distribution of order sizes\n- Distribution of due dates within the week\n- Product family distribution (what % of weekly demand is whites vs. tints vs. specialty)\n- Whether batches have minimum or maximum sizes\n- Line 2 jam frequency (every week or two → distribution?)\n- Line 2 downtime duration (couple hours to half shift → distribution?)\n\n## Initial Conditions and State\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:**\n- What state are lines in at Monday 8 AM when demand book arrives? (Clean? Mid-run? Last product family run?)\n- Are there any orders in progress or in QA hold from prior week?\n- Initial inventory or work-in-process?\n\n## Validation and Evidence Sources\n\n**Validation intent (from scheduler):**\n- Model should show on-time delivery performance\n- Model should count changeover hours\n- Model should allow testing alternative sequences\n- Model should support pre-planning reshuffles when Line 2 fails\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:**\n- What observation, replay, or comparison would make the model credible enough to use?\n- What historical data is available (past demand books, actual run logs, changeover records, downtime logs)?\n- Are actual rates, changeover times, QA hold times recorded somewhere, or only in scheduler's head/sheet?\n\n## Open Questions and Unresolved Material\n\n### Critical for construction but not yet asked:\n1. Specific production rates (units/hour) for product-line combinations\n2. Changeover times: tint-to-tint, all specialty combinations, whether times vary by line\n3. Fill-up times\n4. Ramp scrap quantities by changeover type\n5. Hours per shift\n6. Line 3 SKU qualification details\n7. Initial state at start of simulation week\n8. Whether orders can be split across lines or must run whole on one line\n9. Holding tank capacities and constraints\n10. Frequency distributions: Line 2 jams, downtime durations, QA failures, materials shortages\n11. Due date distribution in demand book\n12. Product family distribution in demand book\n13. Validation: what would make model credible, what historical data exists\n\n### Consequential unknowns flagged by scheduler:\n- Exact scrap per changeover type (Quality has monthly %, scheduler doesn't have detail)\n- Exact rates (scheduler has them \"in my head — or in the sheet\" but not stated in interview)\n\n### Deliberate simplifications or omissions:\n- None explicitly proposed yet\n\n### Assumptions:\n- None explicitly introduced yet\n\n### Conflicts or corrections:\n- None yet\n\n### Contextual variations noted but not fully explored:\n- Line 2 downtime: \"couple hours\" vs. \"more like half a shift\" (context: initial estimate vs. actual)\n- QA hold: \"about 4 hours\" for whites, \"sometimes full day\" for specialty, \"backs up end of week\" (context-dependent duration)\n- Scheduler's practiced policy varies by customer urgency and due date pressure\n\n## Target Representation Notes\n\n**Target formalism:** Petri-net-style process model (specific format not known to scheduler; \"I'm not the modelling person\")\n\n**Construction not yet attempted.** No Petrinaut tools invoked. No net elements defined.\n\n**When construction begins, will need to infer:**\n- How to represent line eligibility constraints\n- How to represent scheduler's practiced priority rules under contention\n- How to represent three-option recovery logic when Line 2 fails\n- How to represent holding tanks and multi-stage production flow\n- Whether to model individual units, batches, or orders as tokens\n- How to represent ramp scrap and QA hold\n- How to represent calendar (shift boundaries, day shift only for Line 3, week boundary)\n\n**Consequential gaps that block faithful construction:**\n- Missing rates prevent accurate time modeling\n- Missing changeover time matrix prevents accurate sequencing cost\n- Missing failure/disruption frequency distributions prevent realistic stochastic behavior\n- Missing initial state prevents simulation start\n- Missing validation criteria prevent assessing whether constructed model is fit for purpose", + "workpiece": { + "content": "# Coatings Plant Production Scheduling Model\n\n## Model Purpose and Objectives\n\n**Primary simulation questions:**\n- Are orders getting out on time?\n- How many changeover hours are being consumed?\n- Is there a smarter sequence that reduces changeover time?\n- What is the best reshuffle when Line 2 goes down?\n\n**Intended decision support:**\n- Test scheduling decisions before making them in production\n- Evaluate trade-off: hold line idle waiting for same product-family order vs. wash down and run next order\n- Pre-plan responses to Line 2 filler failures\n\n**Success measures:**\n- On-time delivery (especially Meridian customer - risk of fines and delisting if late)\n- Changeover hours (boss wants these reduced to recover capacity)\n- Ability to recover lost time through better sequencing\n\n**Audience:** Master scheduler and management\n\n## Process Boundary and Triggers\n\n**Boundary:**\n- Starts: Monday morning ~8 AM when demand book drops from ERP\n- Ends: Orders ship after QA clearance (typically by Friday, sometimes slips to Monday)\n- Inside boundary: Scheduling, line allocation, production execution, QA hold, shipping\n- Outside boundary: ERP demand generation, materials supply (mentioned as occasionally short, not detailed)\n\n**Trigger:** \n- Weekly demand book arrives Monday ~8 AM\n- Spreadsheet with 40-60 orders per week (can reach 60 when busy)\n- Each order: SKU, quantity, due date\n\n**Horizon:** One-week planning cycle (Monday-Friday)\n\n## Product Families and Distinctions\n\n**Product families** (operation treats these differently due to changeover costs):\n- **Whites** — high volume\n- **Tinted colors** — moderate volume\n- **Specialty clears** — handful per week\n\n**Operational distinction:** Switching between families is expensive; scheduler groups by family when possible.\n\n## Resources: Production Lines\n\n### Line 1\n- **Description:** Old workhorse\n- **Speed:** Slower (baseline)\n- **Qualification:** Everything — all whites, all tints, all specialty clears\n- **Availability:** Two shifts normally\n- **Notes:** Reliable; tiny holding tank between mill and fill (backs things up)\n\n### Line 2\n- **Description:** Fast line\n- **Speed:** About 2x Line 1 speed on whites (\"that's where you really see it\")\n- **Qualification:** Whites and tints only; cannot run specialty clears (never piped for specialty resins)\n- **Availability:** Two shifts normally\n- **Special constraints:** Meridian whites MUST run on Line 2 (customer audited this line years ago)\n- **Reliability issue:** Filler jams every week or two\n- **Notes:** Better holding tank between mill and fill than Line 1\n\n### Line 3\n- **Description:** Newest line\n- **Speed:** Between Line 1 and Line 2, closer to Line 2's speed\n- **Qualification:** Being qualified product-by-product; can run most whites, some tints (some tint SKUs not yet signed off), and specialties (qualified more recently)\n- **Availability:** Day shift only unless overtime approved\n- **Notes:** Still expanding qualification list\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:** Specific list of which SKUs are qualified on Line 3.\n\n## Process Spine: One Order From Demand Book to Ship\n\n**Source case:** Meridian order VW-01 (high-volume interior white), 800 units, due Friday\n\n### 1. Demand book arrival (Monday ~8 AM)\nOrder appears as line in spreadsheet: SKU, quantity, due date.\n\n### 2. Scheduler builds allocation sheet\n- **Activity:** Match orders to lines, sequence them\n- **Performer:** Master scheduler\n- **Approach:** Group orders by product family when possible (minimize expensive family-switches)\n- **Constraints applied:**\n - Meridian whites → Line 2 (mandatory)\n - Specialty clears → Line 1 or Line 3 only\n - Line 3 → only if SKU qualified and capacity available\n- **Time estimation:** Quantity ÷ rate + fill-up time + changeover time\n- **Check:** Does it all fit in the week?\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:** Specific rates (units/hour) by product-line combination. Scheduler has these \"in my head — or in the sheet.\" Fill-up times by line or product.\n\n### 3. Daily floor huddle (every morning 7:30 AM)\n- **Participants:** Scheduler, line leads, maintenance, QA\n- **Topics:** What finished overnight, what's running now, any problems\n- **Activity:** Scheduler adjusts schedule on the fly (line jams, batch QA holds, materials slip)\n- **Execution:** Verbal adjustments, people go execute\n\n### 4. Order waits for sequenced slot\n**Example:** VW-01 slotted for Tuesday afternoon, after another white finishes on Line 2.\n\n### 5. Changeover\n**Example case (white-to-white on Line 2):** Quick rinse, 20-30 minutes. Crew cleans residual from last batch, flushes system.\n\n**Known changeover times:**\n- White → white: 20-30 minutes (quick rinse)\n- White → tint: ~45 minutes\n- Tint → white: 3 hours (full washdown; pigment carryover ruins white batch)\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:**\n- Tint → tint changeover time\n- Specialty clear changeover times (to/from whites, tints, other clears)\n- Whether changeover times vary by line\n\n**Ramp scrap:** First few units after any changeover don't meet spec (residual from rinse, concentrations stabilizing). Scrapped or reworked. Worse after big washdowns (tint → white). \"Not so bad\" after quick rinse.\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:** Scrap quantities by changeover type. Quality tracks scrap as monthly percentage; scheduler does not have per-changeover figures.\n\n### 6. Production run\n**Stages (in sequence):**\n1. **Mix:** Blend base resin with additives in mix tank\n2. **Mill:** Grind to particle size\n3. **Tint and letdown:** For whites, mostly thinning to spec (no pigment)\n4. **Fill and pack:** Into cans, labeled, palletized\n\n**Holding tanks:** Between stages. Mill can keep feeding while fill catches up or vice versa. Line 2 tank (between mill and fill) is better than Line 1's tiny tank.\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:** Holding tank capacities, whether they constrain throughput.\n\n**Run time example:** 800 units on Line 2 for whites took \"about half a shift\" (quantity at Line 2 rate + fill-up time + ramp settling after changeover).\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:** Hours per shift. Specific production rates.\n\n### 7. QA hold\n- **Duration:** ~4 hours for whites; sometimes full day for specialty\n- **Activity:** Lab pulls samples, runs tests\n- **Resource:** 2-person lab\n- **Congestion:** Backs up end of week\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:** QA failure rate, what happens when batch fails QA (mentioned \"adjust and retest\" as occasional issue).\n\n### 8. Ship\nOnce QA clears, order ships.\n\n**Example timeline:** Run Tuesday afternoon, finish Tuesday night, clear QA Wednesday morning, ship Wednesday (well ahead of Friday due date).\n\n**Reality qualifier (from scheduler):** \"That's the clean version. Reality is messier — filler on Line 2 jams every week or two, materials occasionally short, QA finds something off and we have to adjust and retest.\"\n\n## Disruptions and Recovery\n\n### Line 2 filler jam (occurs every week or two)\n\n**Last occurrence (2-3 weeks ago):**\n- Line 2 mid-run on VW-03 (contractor-grade flat white), filler jammed ~6 AM\n- Cause: Bag broke in hopper, made a mess, whole thing locked up\n- Maintenance estimate at huddle: \"at least a couple hours\"\n- Actual duration: \"more like half a shift\"\n\n**Three options when line goes down mid-run:**\n\n1. **Wait it out**\n - When: Maintenance says 1-2 hours and run almost done\n - Product already in tanks, only losing time\n \n2. **Move rest of run to another line**\n - Cost: Lose fill-up already paid, redo setup on new line\n - Prerequisites: New line must be free AND qualified for the product\n - When: Line will be down half a shift or more AND capacity available elsewhere\n \n3. **Scrap in-progress, restart whole run later**\n - When: Almost never; only if batch already off-spec or line down for days\n - Reason: Too wasteful\n\n**Decision factors (scheduler's account):**\n- Maintenance time estimate\n- Availability of another qualified line\n- Whether moving would \"screw up something more urgent\"\n- \"Gut feel\"\n- If Meridian order with tight due date → more aggressive about moving\n- If small distributor order that can slip a few days → wait\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:**\n- Frequency distribution of Line 2 jams\n- Duration distribution of Line 2 downtime\n- Frequency and nature of \"materials occasionally short\"\n- What happens to work already in holding tanks when line stops mid-run\n\n### Other disruptions mentioned but not detailed:\n- Batch fails QA hold → adjust and retest (frequency and impact not asked)\n- Materials slip (frequency, which materials, advance warning not asked)\n\n## Scheduling Constraints and Policies\n\n### Hard constraints (from scheduler account):\n- Meridian whites MUST go on Line 2 (customer requirement, audited that line)\n- Specialty clears can ONLY go on Lines 1 or 3 (Line 2 not piped for specialty resins)\n- Line 3 SKU-by-SKU qualification (some tints not yet signed off)\n\n### Practiced policies:\n- Group orders by product family when possible (minimize changeover cost)\n- Prefer white-to-white sequences over white-tint-white (avoid 3-hour washdown)\n- When contention exists: Meridian orders get priority (due to penalty/delisting risk)\n\n### Trade-off under uncertainty (scheduler's stated dilemma):\n- If Line 2 finishing a white and another white order \"coming in a couple hours,\" hold line idle vs. wash down to tint?\n- Scheduler \"thinks waiting sometimes makes sense\" but cannot prove it\n- Boss wants fewer changeover hours\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:**\n- How \"couple hours\" or other wait-time thresholds factor into practiced decision\n- Whether orders actually arrive during the week or all appear Monday in demand book\n- Whether partial orders or rush orders ever interrupt the plan\n\n## Quantities, Rates, Time\n\n**Known:**\n- Demand book: 40-60 orders/week\n- Example order: 800 units\n- Line 2 speed: ~2x Line 1 on whites\n- Line 3 speed: between L1 and L2, closer to L2\n- Line 2 on 800-unit white: \"about half a shift\"\n- Changeover times: see Process Spine section 5\n- QA hold: ~4 hours whites, up to full day specialty\n- Shifts: Lines 1 and 2 run two shifts; Line 3 day shift only (unless overtime)\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:**\n- Specific units/hour rates by product-line combination\n- Hours per shift\n- Fill-up time by line or product\n- Ramp scrap quantities\n- Distribution of order sizes\n- Distribution of due dates within the week\n- Product family distribution (what % of weekly demand is whites vs. tints vs. specialty)\n- Whether batches have minimum or maximum sizes\n- Line 2 jam frequency (every week or two → distribution?)\n- Line 2 downtime duration (couple hours to half shift → distribution?)\n\n## Initial Conditions and State\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:**\n- What state are lines in at Monday 8 AM when demand book arrives? (Clean? Mid-run? Last product family run?)\n- Are there any orders in progress or in QA hold from prior week?\n- Initial inventory or work-in-process?\n\n## Validation and Evidence Sources\n\n**Validation intent (from scheduler):**\n- Model should show on-time delivery performance\n- Model should count changeover hours\n- Model should allow testing alternative sequences\n- Model should support pre-planning reshuffles when Line 2 fails\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:**\n- What observation, replay, or comparison would make the model credible enough to use?\n- What historical data is available (past demand books, actual run logs, changeover records, downtime logs)?\n- Are actual rates, changeover times, QA hold times recorded somewhere, or only in scheduler's head/sheet?\n\n## Open Questions and Unresolved Material\n\n### Critical for construction but not yet asked:\n1. Specific production rates (units/hour) for product-line combinations\n2. Changeover times: tint-to-tint, all specialty combinations, whether times vary by line\n3. Fill-up times\n4. Ramp scrap quantities by changeover type\n5. Hours per shift\n6. Line 3 SKU qualification details\n7. Initial state at start of simulation week\n8. Whether orders can be split across lines or must run whole on one line\n9. Holding tank capacities and constraints\n10. Frequency distributions: Line 2 jams, downtime durations, QA failures, materials shortages\n11. Due date distribution in demand book\n12. Product family distribution in demand book\n13. Validation: what would make model credible, what historical data exists\n\n### Consequential unknowns flagged by scheduler:\n- Exact scrap per changeover type (Quality has monthly %, scheduler doesn't have detail)\n- Exact rates (scheduler has them \"in my head — or in the sheet\" but not stated in interview)\n\n### Deliberate simplifications or omissions:\n- None explicitly proposed yet\n\n### Assumptions:\n- None explicitly introduced yet\n\n### Conflicts or corrections:\n- None yet\n\n### Contextual variations noted but not fully explored:\n- Line 2 downtime: \"couple hours\" vs. \"more like half a shift\" (context: initial estimate vs. actual)\n- QA hold: \"about 4 hours\" for whites, \"sometimes full day\" for specialty, \"backs up end of week\" (context-dependent duration)\n- Scheduler's practiced policy varies by customer urgency and due date pressure\n\n## Target Representation Notes\n\n**Target formalism:** Petri-net-style process model (specific format not known to scheduler; \"I'm not the modelling person\")\n\n**Construction not yet attempted.** No Petrinaut tools invoked. No net elements defined.\n\n**When construction begins, will need to infer:**\n- How to represent line eligibility constraints\n- How to represent scheduler's practiced priority rules under contention\n- How to represent three-option recovery logic when Line 2 fails\n- How to represent holding tanks and multi-stage production flow\n- Whether to model individual units, batches, or orders as tokens\n- How to represent ramp scrap and QA hold\n- How to represent calendar (shift boundaries, day shift only for Line 3, week boundary)\n\n**Consequential gaps that block faithful construction:**\n- Missing rates prevent accurate time modeling\n- Missing changeover time matrix prevents accurate sequencing cost\n- Missing failure/disruption frequency distributions prevent realistic stochastic behavior\n- Missing initial state prevents simulation start\n- Missing validation criteria prevent assessing whether constructed model is fit for purpose", + "sha256": "99e4e201cdb4959c114495049e68d7f4d18bdc5c41a5b1d958001b4027fbe355", + "sourceMessageId": "entry_01M1GZ1BQQ6Y1SBS51E3K1W0NE", + "sourceMessageSha256": "42d1d9b7de99f143ed85c57dd3f09dcc166c55bf3e3c409a0607ec360d54dcf5" + }, + "violations": [], + "wroteCaptureStore": false, + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "794fe2fbf1eaeba3fc816c6e3d1755d7b444125d", + "instrumentStatus": "", + "fileSha256": { + "yarn.lock": "3f445d255ef7893c1941f5610e2a813a903d5b9053c9831012c3d7c3875571dc", + "apps/brunch-agent/package.json": "27182018edf5c595522815ea28d78e549d387c127714c0ea2c54a84822ead742", + "apps/brunch-agent/vite.config.ts": "f1a50233829599dff2d5ef7ee0cd10bdb55d7fe65a52a6e85913e00a33a5300d", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/app.ts": "979efb9172c82df7499b218125735929a9586a0d9355e042e9ff2402955f385e", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/db.ts": "9f3a2598df3ce6737de1348afa8baf7deeeeac51b8202bf87adb76dc96374481", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "e87ebbd611dd87f897c0ab15c704e6604bc032f99a96ee1a3bb827c03344300e", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/ping.ts": "a6f50f65f1bb4f1b62a2bf5fa23b343b973dd007be720a33dfbf5cd4a0595744", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/identity.ts": "b52f764ba6e6bb50602d477eb93234aa6a900c843412551de40ea6ad3050e5e6", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/transcript.ts": "b96cf8d2b8352d414f674985b7071c9570323ccaf862f7e77ec76311e4b11d44", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/http/routes.ts": "7d8389931c57671ad8376d0a0ab497413013d47b012ffbf531339d0d1ce3a0cd", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/artifacts.ts": "15951ab3705b126d64a2593731b50775a16915298dae87b8cf7c99e265e2c2f4", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/campaign-integrity.ts": "60215179f5d48bacbf4da7b0876d049ed8b15b4b774d99eab092a1297502a3b4", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/load-built-application.ts": "c4b28985ad98dd1dde5afb8838ba6f9445692d208adde05c22f30f6074365056", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v3-run.ts": "a0a197af22d0a007f73836db49cd13a2c776e57d0dab047e537868c9ff2f33f9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/package.json": "e12d9cc79d38c43e5543a5667753e5049dfbf21bec425c25942f1c4cbb922a1f", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "82b035268c07cc8ee4736b5ffdd392c8f153793d2ca6b9ed57271c9b6146de10", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "0bd463eaab4eb68b86431bf26e0e01f90c89437b2888c86f4da53d7a0f39ec13", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/package.json": "dca0db144c530bcf66c5400c029efa5e1136c9d7f81ed174343e891985200c33", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md": "9915751f11baf06de31b237ee8df57b5217f2e7f0531090370a7e08d0282b6c2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "d5bac87a192b92fb6b7d749ec3d58116f9e39527b59e425c60aaeedf5cc13bd0", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts": "a283342146c8d2c2cb8056c588e76c1c3094f1e21e731be251c8fcdb335ed1b2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "ea3a8755a576e98d35fce6a1e1f928a61148eb713f0bc2c2f818d104eb5f3832", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "6c26ed3808ccbb7133ea7c370779e63885dfdc342c6594f5cb3730b467e2b1da", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "43dbc9adc9168ae9984321895fca441386ee3c44ab8691ba92baec0f7c43f400", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts": "7a4a03b62267531ba65b0f27128d804ad7fc70acf333266910010cc999f19d40", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts": "9e020d8bee5e6c9902b5e5b609abc5930d3e27647d0f4d0d4679f3e31097dfbb", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/opening-message.md": "84ec5faa5fd46699c008b3b2aad49eb9988b8c2ab039c8e147fdb077d562ef54", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/situation-pack.md": "4dbeb44a881c4675ec0ce7a5f068ea46ce1a4968a405b2dd692f92816d33e083", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/vestera-scheduling/truth-ledger-v1-prospective.yaml": "6be9753bcbeb31a4bcb839be1acd4de4a15b1754af25d2cdd0b75fe63dd3d860", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/ir-quality-ruler-v1.md": "817e43d15848bcec3c720a3e8b1104d31faf3035fd7ae8269d0a97ee43ef4a9a", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1/omniscient-grader.md": "a0ab12ceb3fc26d314b3f674ed6728a6bf5a6a24d2325ed32336020a605d96e5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1/cold-ir-reviewer.md": "ddd2620f17c5311a4a186b5bc229ae3f916d811e4aeb35f215ed7502c31fc8f5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v3/protocol.md": "faba12be8642400e60df37bc5bf5c321541f922d9f0433cf1455423492a2be7a", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md": "f57f4177edbe957092e86c19826a003b6c9257c319a129008428839e4cf0e2b7", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-50-28-709Z-20a4817f.ir.md": "3ee05f3d5d88f3061b360467e755606f7c43e07bdfacdfebb094bebaee23e732", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-50-28-709Z-20a4817f.omniscient.md": "82dbe47745b175cca93d50ea64a45715bfafd860d109904c1d5136282fae0aa0", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-50-28-709Z-20a4817f.cold.md": "c832a84226a4fb795281b96185b5efae13bdcf59a2db6c9cf481e5cd9b0b81b8", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-56-34-754Z-4b75737c.ir.md": "4d15050ac6a2a89e1f6a371a604522504bbb90c0893c2029773b1b906db85043", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-56-34-754Z-4b75737c.omniscient.md": "ee81f16127bf255a3247a3c9f42508970542beebf38a3445d9be18e0f765e120", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-56-34-754Z-4b75737c.cold.md": "d072d7fe27e6b8458ccb7d9119c7901fcc45d47d88141b970ce2d9ac2a0b2224" + }, + "builtArtifactManifest": [ + { + "path": "apps/brunch-agent/dist/app.mjs", + "sha256": "5ce74b2646c00b959b3ee847b47e006717ccc21e1fba769ce818566cba6da62e" + }, + { + "path": "apps/brunch-agent/dist/node-server-BWNSXBme.mjs", + "sha256": "90343929bc5274e0644003e8d7ea69b02003ac4d3b364a0afdb0be0e1032c066" + }, + { + "path": "apps/brunch-agent/dist/server.mjs", + "sha256": "c2d4ccb5aa999e33d33530ba87280e4bb6d6aacd41df630876297bfabea8f04e" + } + ], + "builtArtifactManifestSha256": "5bb67f5cbb1315e789426d83780ed9af23c58b1a04cf14a4b62a831cae435cd0" + }, + "transcript": "## User\nI'm the master scheduler at a coatings plant. My boss wants a simulation model of how we\nschedule production, so we can test scheduling decisions before making them. We have tooling\nthat runs Petri-net-style process models, so the end product should be a model I can hand to\nthat — but I can't tell you much about the format, I'm not the modelling person.\n\nPlease interview me about how our operation works, and then produce the model.\n\n## Assistant\nI'll help you develop a simulation model of your scheduling operation. Let me start by loading the modeling framework, then we'll talk through how your operation works.Good. Now let's talk about how your operation actually works.\n\nBefore we dive into the details, help me understand what you're trying to accomplish with this simulation. **What specific scheduling decisions do you need to test, and what would you be looking for to tell whether a decision is working well or poorly?**\n- tool activate_skill (toolu_01N61ni3XJpbKBS1pZXxvpgD): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation, review, or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Before substantive\\nelicitation or workpiece revision, read\\n`references/universal-elicitation.md` and `references/profile.md`.\\n\\nFor review, first inspect the supplied workpiece or model. If it already answers\\nthe question, answer without reading the elicitation references or interviewing.\\nIf the review exposes a gap that requires human knowledge, read both elicitation\\nreferences and then ask exactly one focused question that resolves the smallest\\nconsequential gap.\\n\\nRead `templates/workpiece.md` only when first creating or materially revising\\nthe workpiece. Do not load the template merely to inspect an existing artifact,\\nanswer a resolvable review question, or frame the first elicitation question.\\nConstruct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in\\nthis conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview.\\nRead `references/pn-construction.md` and `references/checks.md`, then use the\\nmounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful\\nconstruction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive\\nelicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read\\n`references/pn-construction.md` and `references/checks.md` before beginning.\\nUse mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting\\ndefinition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are\\nabsent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `references/checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted.\\nDeliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the\\nmounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can\\nsupport, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target\\nor current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- references/checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/checks.md\\n- references/pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/pn-construction.md\\n- references/profile.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/profile.md\\n- references/universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/universal-elicitation.md\\n- templates/workpiece.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/templates/workpiece.md\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (toolu_01LTMkcUNraBdu4AnqXYCNkp): \"# Universal Elicitation Reference\\n\\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\\n\\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Work from purpose\\n\\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\\n\\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\\n\\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\\n\\n### Follow the person's account\\n\\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\\n\\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\\n\\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\\n\\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\\n\\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\\n\\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\\n\\n### Treat divergence as information\\n\\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\\n\\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\\n\\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\\n\\n### Stop honestly\\n\\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\\n\\n### Vague or compressed language\\n\\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\\n\\n### Normative language\\n\\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\\n\\n### Tension within or between accounts\\n\\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\\n\\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\\n\\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\\n\\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\\n\\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\\n\\n### Diminishing yield\\n\\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\\n\\n### Assent without independent wording\\n\\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\\n\\n### Silence and absence\\n\\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\\n\\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\\n\\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\\n\\n### Slice a concrete case\\n\\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\\n\\n### Sweep one property\\n\\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\\n\\n### Ask for the last occurrence\\n\\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\\n\\n### Ask for the basis\\n\\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\\n\\n### Ground a term or artifact\\n\\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\\n\\n### Clarify until observable\\n\\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\\n\\n### Use contrastive cases\\n\\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\\n\\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\\n\\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\\n\\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\\n\\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\\n\\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\\n\\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\\n\\n### Restate for correction\\n\\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\\n\\n### Propose structure for correction\\n\\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\\n\\n### Deposit and defer\\n\\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\\n\\n### Press without trapping\\n\\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\\n\\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\\n\\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\\n\\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\\n\\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\\n\\n### Trade concrete outcomes\\n\\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\\n\\n### Close with one correction opportunity\\n\\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\\n\\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\\n\\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\\n\\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\\n\\n### Before asking\\n\\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\\n\\n### Before recording\\n\\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\\n\\n### Before closing\\n\\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (toolu_01GLhHLrYu5LK8sArEbjPgae): \"# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\\n\\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\\n\\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\\n\\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\\n\\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\\n\\n### Keep target structure backstage\\n\\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\\n\\n### Preserve operational context\\n\\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\\n\\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\\n\\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\\n\\n### Language and account signals\\n\\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\\n\\n### Operational situation patterns\\n\\n#### Timed work\\n\\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\\n\\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\\n\\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\\n\\n#### Contended resource\\n\\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\\n\\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\\n\\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\\n\\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\\n\\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\\n\\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\\n\\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\\n\\n#### Mode change\\n\\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\\n\\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\\n\\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\\n\\n#### Spatial transfer\\n\\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\\n\\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\\n\\n#### Policy under pressure\\n\\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\\n\\n#### Hidden waiting\\n\\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\\n\\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\\n\\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\\n\\n### Link the slice to the objective\\n\\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\\n\\n### Expose the process spine\\n\\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\\n\\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\\n\\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\\n\\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\\n\\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\\n\\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\\n\\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\\n\\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\\n\\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\\n\\n### Close a resource account\\n\\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\\n\\n### Close a mode change in both directions\\n\\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\\n\\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\\n\\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\\n\\n### Ask what is conserved\\n\\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\\n\\n### Establish retry scope\\n\\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\\n\\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\\n\\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\\n\\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\\n\\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\\n\\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\\n\\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\\n\\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\\n\\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\\n\\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\\n\\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\\n\\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\\n\\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\\n\\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\\n\\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\\n\\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\\n\\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\\n\\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\\n\\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\\n\\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\\n\\n### Purpose and process\\n\\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\\n\\n### Operational semantics\\n\\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\\n\\n### Quantities and context\\n\\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\\n\"\n\n## User\n*(settles into a chair, coffee mug in hand)*\n\nThe main thing? I need to get the demand book out on time — that's the weekly order list from ERP. Late orders are what gets me in trouble, especially with Meridian. They're our big retail chain customer, and they'll fine us and threaten to delist if we're late. So that's non-negotiable.\n\nBut beyond that... *(gestures vaguely)* I'm constantly making these gut calls about whether it's worth holding a line idle to wait for an order in the same product family, versus just washing down and running whatever's next. Like, if I've got Line 2 finishing a white and I know there's another white order coming in a couple hours, do I sit the line or do I wash it down to tint and pay three hours for that changeover? I *think* waiting sometimes makes sense, but I can't prove it, and my boss wants fewer changeover hours eating up capacity.\n\nAnd when a line goes down at six in the morning — which happens, especially the filler on Line 2 — I'm re-juggling the whole sheet at the huddle, and it's all improvisation. It'd be nice to know ahead of time what the best reshuffle actually is.\n\n*(pauses)*\n\nSo I guess what I'm looking for is: are we getting orders out on time, how many changeover hours are we actually burning, and whether there's a smarter way to sequence things that claws back some of that lost time. Does that make sense?\n\n## Assistant\nThat makes perfect sense. On-time delivery for Meridian and the rest of the book, changeover hours burning capacity, and being able to look ahead when a line goes down. Those are concrete things I can work with.\n\nLet me follow a typical case so I understand how this actually flows. **Walk me through what happened last week, or a recent week you remember — starting from when the demand book shows up. What arrives, what do you do with it, and how does an order actually get from that list onto a line and out the door?**\n\n## User\n*(leans back, thinking)*\n\nOkay, so... Monday morning, usually around 8 AM, the demand book drops from ERP. It's a spreadsheet — maybe 40, 50 orders that week, could be 60 if we're busy. Each line is an SKU, how many units, and a due date. Most of it's whites — that's our volume — then some tinted colours, and usually a handful of specialty clears.\n\nI take that list and I build the sheet. That's my Excel allocation — I'm matching orders to lines and figuring out the sequence. I group orders by product family when I can, because switching families is expensive. White to tint is maybe 45 minutes, but tint back to white? Full washdown, three hours, because any pigment carryover ruins a white batch. So I'm trying to keep whites together, tints together.\n\nI also know some products can only run certain places. Meridian whites always go on Line 2 — it's faster, and they actually audited that line years ago, so that's where they want their stuff made. Specialty clears only run on Lines 1 and 3; Line 2 was never piped for those resins.\n\n*(sips coffee)*\n\nOnce I've got the sequence roughed out, I'm estimating times. Each product-line combo has a rate in my head — or in the sheet, really. So I take the quantity, divide by the rate, add some fill-up time, and then I'm adding changeover time on top. That gives me a rough idea if it all fits in the week.\n\nThen the week starts running. Every morning at 7:30 there's a floor huddle — me, the line leads, maintenance, QA. We talk about what finished overnight, what's running now, any problems. And I'm adjusting on the fly. A line jams, a batch fails QA hold, materials slip... I'm moving stuff around verbally, and people go execute.\n\nOrders finish, sit in QA hold for a few hours — maybe four, longer for specialty — then they ship. By Friday afternoon we've usually cleared most of it. Sometimes something slips to Monday.\n\nDoes that give you the picture?\n\n## Assistant\nGood, that's giving me the shape of it. Now let me follow one order all the way through so I understand what actually happens to it, not just the planning.\n\n**Pick one order from last week or the week before — maybe a Meridian white, since those matter most. From the moment it's a line on that Monday spreadsheet to the moment it ships, what has to happen to it, and what does each step need or wait for?**\n\n## User\n*(thinks for a moment)*\n\nAlright, let's say... Meridian order for VW-01, our high-volume interior white. 800 units, due Friday. That's on the sheet for Line 2, naturally.\n\nSo the order goes into my sequence — let's say I slot it for Tuesday afternoon, after we finish a run of another white that's already on the line. That's good because it's white-to-white, so the changeover is just a quick rinse, maybe 20, 30 minutes. The crew cleans out the residual from the last batch, flushes the system.\n\nOnce the line's clean, they start the run. First stage is **mix** — they're blending the base resin with additives in the mix tank. Then it moves to the **mill**, where it gets ground down to the right particle size. From there it goes to **tint and letdown** — for a white that's mostly just thinning it to spec, no pigment. Then finally **fill and pack** — into cans, labeled, palletized.\n\n*(gestures as if tracing the flow)*\n\nThere are holding tanks between those stages, so the mill can keep feeding while fill is catching up, or vice versa. Though... *(pauses)* the tank between mill and fill on Line 1 is tiny and it backs things up, but Line 2's is better.\n\nThe run takes... I don't know, with Line 2 on whites, maybe half a shift? That's 800 units at Line 2's rate plus the fill-up time and a bit of ramp while the line settles after the changeover. First few units after any changeover are scrap — ramp sc\n\n## Assistant\n*(let them finish the thought about scrap)* — go on, you were saying first few units are scrap?\n\n## User\n*(nods)*\n\nYeah, ramp scrap. First few units after any changeover, the line's still settling — residual from the rinse, concentrations stabilizing, that kind of thing. Those units don't meet spec, so they get scrapped or reworked. It's worse after the big washdowns, like tint back to white. After a quick rinse it's not so bad.\n\n*(shrugs)*\n\nQuality tracks scrap as a monthly percentage, so I couldn't tell you exactly how much per changeover type. It's just... part of the cost of switching.\n\nAnyway, once the 800 units come off the line, they go into **QA hold**. The lab pulls samples, runs tests — usually takes about four hours for whites. Specialty sits longer, sometimes a full day. The lab's only two people, and end of week it backs up.\n\nOnce QA clears it, it ships. So for that Meridian order — if it runs Tuesday afternoon, finishes Tuesday night, clears QA Wednesday morning — it's out the door Wednesday, well ahead of Friday.\n\n*(takes another sip of coffee)*\n\nThat's the clean version, anyway. Reality is messier — the filler on Line 2 jams every week or two, materials occasionally short, QA finds something off and we have to adjust and retest. But that's the basic flow.\n\n## Assistant\nGood, that's helpful. You mentioned the filler on Line 2 jams every week or two, and when a line goes down at six in the morning you're reshuffling at the huddle. \n\n**What actually happened the last time Line 2 went down? What was supposed to be running, what did you do with it, and where did you move things to?**\n\n## User\n*(grimaces slightly)*\n\nOh, that was... two weeks ago? Maybe three. Line 2 was in the middle of a big white run — I think it was VW-03, the contractor-grade flat — and the filler jammed around 6 AM. Bag broke in the hopper, made a mess, whole thing locked up.\n\nAt the huddle, maintenance said it'd be at least a couple hours to clear and reset. Turned out to be more like half a shift, but we didn't know that yet.\n\n*(leans forward, gesturing)*\n\nSo I had to figure out what to do with the rest of that run. Line 1 was already on a tint — couldn't just stop that mid-batch. Line 3 was free, but... *(pauses)* Line 3 is slower on whites, and honestly I hate moving a half-finished run because you lose the setup, you're re-doing the fill-up, it's inefficient. So I decided to just wait it out on Line 2, let maintenance fix it, finish the run there.\n\nBut that pushed everything else back. I had a tint order that was supposed to start on Line 2 that afternoon — moved that to Line 1 the next morning instead, which meant Line 1 had to wash down from tint to... no, wait, it was\n\n## Assistant\n— it's fine, you don't need to reconstruct every move from that day. Let me ask it differently:\n\n**When Line 2 goes down mid-run like that, what are your actual options? Can you pause the run and restart it later on the same line, can you move it to another line, do you have to scrap what's in progress? And what decides which option you pick?**\n\n## User\n*(nods, relieved to speak generally)*\n\nOkay, yeah — so if a line goes down mid-run, I've basically got three options.\n\n**One:** Wait it out. If maintenance says it's going to be an hour or two, and the run's almost done anyway, I just let the line sit and finish it when it's back up. The product's already in the tanks, you're not losing much except time.\n\n**Two:** Move the rest of the run to another line. That's a pain — you lose the fill-up you already paid, you're re-doing the setup on the new line, and you need that line to be free *and* qualified for the product. But if Line 2's going to be down half a shift or more and I've got capacity elsewhere, sometimes I'll do it.\n\n**Three:** Scrap what's in progress and restart the whole run later. I almost never do that unless something's really wrong — like if QA says the batch is already off-spec, or the line's going to be down for days. Too wasteful.\n\n*(leans back)*\n\nWhat decides? Mostly how long maintenance thinks it'll take, and whether I've got another line that can take it without screwing up something more urgent. And honestly... *(shrugs)* gut feel. If it's a Meridian order and the due date's tight, I'm more aggressive about moving it. If it's a small distributor order that can slip a few days, I'll wait.\n\n## Assistant\nAlright, so you've got three lines with different capabilities. Let me make sure I understand the constraints.\n\n**You mentioned Line 2 is faster for whites and it's the only one qualified for Meridian. What are the actual differences between your three lines — what can run where, and how do their speeds compare?**\n\n## User\n*(settles in)*\n\nOkay, so — **Line 1** is the old workhorse. It's slower, but it's qualified for everything. All the whites, all the tints, and all the specialty clears. It's the reliable one, but you pay for that in speed.\n\n**Line 2** is the fast line. It's about twice as fast as Line 1, at least on whites — that's where you really see it. That's why all the Meridian whites go there; the volume needs that speed. But Line 2 was never piped for the specialty resins, so it can't run the clears at all. Whites and tints only.\n\n**Line 3** is the newest. It's quick — somewhere between the two, maybe closer to Line 2's speed. But it's still being qualified product by product. It can run most of the whites and some of the tints, but there are still a couple tint SKUs that haven't been signed off yet. And it does specialties — that's newer, but it's qualified for them.\n\n*(pauses, thinking)*\n\nOh, and Line 3 only runs day shift unless we get overtime approved. Lines 1 and 2 run two shifts normally.\n\nSo if I've got a big white order, I want Line 2. Specialty, it's Line 1 or 3. And if Line 2's jammed and I need to move a white... Line 1 or Line 3, depending on what's free and whether Line 3 is actually qualified for that particular SKU.\n\nDoes that cover it?\n\n## Assistant\nYes, that's clear. Now let's dig into the changeover piece, since that's the big trade-off you're making.\n\n**You said white-to-tint is 45 minutes and tint-to-white is a full 3-hour washdown. What about the other combinations — white-to-white, tint-to-tint, and anything involving the specialty clears? And does it matter which line, or are those times pretty much the same across all three?**\n\n## User\n[Evaluation stop instruction; not expert evidence] The interview turn budget is exhausted. Emit the full current Markdown runbook IR in one `runbook-ir` fenced block. Do not ask another question, construct the Petri net, or read construction resources. Preserve every unresolved unknown, not-yet-asked item, declined or deferred item, assumption, conflict, correction, contextual coexistence, omission, and loss.\n\n## Assistant\n```runbook-ir\n# Coatings Plant Production Scheduling Model\n\n## Model Purpose and Objectives\n\n**Primary simulation questions:**\n- Are orders getting out on time?\n- How many changeover hours are being consumed?\n- Is there a smarter sequence that reduces changeover time?\n- What is the best reshuffle when Line 2 goes down?\n\n**Intended decision support:**\n- Test scheduling decisions before making them in production\n- Evaluate trade-off: hold line idle waiting for same product-family order vs. wash down and run next order\n- Pre-plan responses to Line 2 filler failures\n\n**Success measures:**\n- On-time delivery (especially Meridian customer - risk of fines and delisting if late)\n- Changeover hours (boss wants these reduced to recover capacity)\n- Ability to recover lost time through better sequencing\n\n**Audience:** Master scheduler and management\n\n## Process Boundary and Triggers\n\n**Boundary:**\n- Starts: Monday morning ~8 AM when demand book drops from ERP\n- Ends: Orders ship after QA clearance (typically by Friday, sometimes slips to Monday)\n- Inside boundary: Scheduling, line allocation, production execution, QA hold, shipping\n- Outside boundary: ERP demand generation, materials supply (mentioned as occasionally short, not detailed)\n\n**Trigger:** \n- Weekly demand book arrives Monday ~8 AM\n- Spreadsheet with 40-60 orders per week (can reach 60 when busy)\n- Each order: SKU, quantity, due date\n\n**Horizon:** One-week planning cycle (Monday-Friday)\n\n## Product Families and Distinctions\n\n**Product families** (operation treats these differently due to changeover costs):\n- **Whites** — high volume\n- **Tinted colors** — moderate volume\n- **Specialty clears** — handful per week\n\n**Operational distinction:** Switching between families is expensive; scheduler groups by family when possible.\n\n## Resources: Production Lines\n\n### Line 1\n- **Description:** Old workhorse\n- **Speed:** Slower (baseline)\n- **Qualification:** Everything — all whites, all tints, all specialty clears\n- **Availability:** Two shifts normally\n- **Notes:** Reliable; tiny holding tank between mill and fill (backs things up)\n\n### Line 2\n- **Description:** Fast line\n- **Speed:** About 2x Line 1 speed on whites (\"that's where you really see it\")\n- **Qualification:** Whites and tints only; cannot run specialty clears (never piped for specialty resins)\n- **Availability:** Two shifts normally\n- **Special constraints:** Meridian whites MUST run on Line 2 (customer audited this line years ago)\n- **Reliability issue:** Filler jams every week or two\n- **Notes:** Better holding tank between mill and fill than Line 1\n\n### Line 3\n- **Description:** Newest line\n- **Speed:** Between Line 1 and Line 2, closer to Line 2's speed\n- **Qualification:** Being qualified product-by-product; can run most whites, some tints (some tint SKUs not yet signed off), and specialties (qualified more recently)\n- **Availability:** Day shift only unless overtime approved\n- **Notes:** Still expanding qualification list\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:** Specific list of which SKUs are qualified on Line 3.\n\n## Process Spine: One Order From Demand Book to Ship\n\n**Source case:** Meridian order VW-01 (high-volume interior white), 800 units, due Friday\n\n### 1. Demand book arrival (Monday ~8 AM)\nOrder appears as line in spreadsheet: SKU, quantity, due date.\n\n### 2. Scheduler builds allocation sheet\n- **Activity:** Match orders to lines, sequence them\n- **Performer:** Master scheduler\n- **Approach:** Group orders by product family when possible (minimize expensive family-switches)\n- **Constraints applied:**\n - Meridian whites → Line 2 (mandatory)\n - Specialty clears → Line 1 or Line 3 only\n - Line 3 → only if SKU qualified and capacity available\n- **Time estimation:** Quantity ÷ rate + fill-up time + changeover time\n- **Check:** Does it all fit in the week?\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:** Specific rates (units/hour) by product-line combination. Scheduler has these \"in my head — or in the sheet.\" Fill-up times by line or product.\n\n### 3. Daily floor huddle (every morning 7:30 AM)\n- **Participants:** Scheduler, line leads, maintenance, QA\n- **Topics:** What finished overnight, what's running now, any problems\n- **Activity:** Scheduler adjusts schedule on the fly (line jams, batch QA holds, materials slip)\n- **Execution:** Verbal adjustments, people go execute\n\n### 4. Order waits for sequenced slot\n**Example:** VW-01 slotted for Tuesday afternoon, after another white finishes on Line 2.\n\n### 5. Changeover\n**Example case (white-to-white on Line 2):** Quick rinse, 20-30 minutes. Crew cleans residual from last batch, flushes system.\n\n**Known changeover times:**\n- White → white: 20-30 minutes (quick rinse)\n- White → tint: ~45 minutes\n- Tint → white: 3 hours (full washdown; pigment carryover ruins white batch)\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:**\n- Tint → tint changeover time\n- Specialty clear changeover times (to/from whites, tints, other clears)\n- Whether changeover times vary by line\n\n**Ramp scrap:** First few units after any changeover don't meet spec (residual from rinse, concentrations stabilizing). Scrapped or reworked. Worse after big washdowns (tint → white). \"Not so bad\" after quick rinse.\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:** Scrap quantities by changeover type. Quality tracks scrap as monthly percentage; scheduler does not have per-changeover figures.\n\n### 6. Production run\n**Stages (in sequence):**\n1. **Mix:** Blend base resin with additives in mix tank\n2. **Mill:** Grind to particle size\n3. **Tint and letdown:** For whites, mostly thinning to spec (no pigment)\n4. **Fill and pack:** Into cans, labeled, palletized\n\n**Holding tanks:** Between stages. Mill can keep feeding while fill catches up or vice versa. Line 2 tank (between mill and fill) is better than Line 1's tiny tank.\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:** Holding tank capacities, whether they constrain throughput.\n\n**Run time example:** 800 units on Line 2 for whites took \"about half a shift\" (quantity at Line 2 rate + fill-up time + ramp settling after changeover).\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:** Hours per shift. Specific production rates.\n\n### 7. QA hold\n- **Duration:** ~4 hours for whites; sometimes full day for specialty\n- **Activity:** Lab pulls samples, runs tests\n- **Resource:** 2-person lab\n- **Congestion:** Backs up end of week\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:** QA failure rate, what happens when batch fails QA (mentioned \"adjust and retest\" as occasional issue).\n\n### 8. Ship\nOnce QA clears, order ships.\n\n**Example timeline:** Run Tuesday afternoon, finish Tuesday night, clear QA Wednesday morning, ship Wednesday (well ahead of Friday due date).\n\n**Reality qualifier (from scheduler):** \"That's the clean version. Reality is messier — filler on Line 2 jams every week or two, materials occasionally short, QA finds something off and we have to adjust and retest.\"\n\n## Disruptions and Recovery\n\n### Line 2 filler jam (occurs every week or two)\n\n**Last occurrence (2-3 weeks ago):**\n- Line 2 mid-run on VW-03 (contractor-grade flat white), filler jammed ~6 AM\n- Cause: Bag broke in hopper, made a mess, whole thing locked up\n- Maintenance estimate at huddle: \"at least a couple hours\"\n- Actual duration: \"more like half a shift\"\n\n**Three options when line goes down mid-run:**\n\n1. **Wait it out**\n - When: Maintenance says 1-2 hours and run almost done\n - Product already in tanks, only losing time\n \n2. **Move rest of run to another line**\n - Cost: Lose fill-up already paid, redo setup on new line\n - Prerequisites: New line must be free AND qualified for the product\n - When: Line will be down half a shift or more AND capacity available elsewhere\n \n3. **Scrap in-progress, restart whole run later**\n - When: Almost never; only if batch already off-spec or line down for days\n - Reason: Too wasteful\n\n**Decision factors (scheduler's account):**\n- Maintenance time estimate\n- Availability of another qualified line\n- Whether moving would \"screw up something more urgent\"\n- \"Gut feel\"\n- If Meridian order with tight due date → more aggressive about moving\n- If small distributor order that can slip a few days → wait\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:**\n- Frequency distribution of Line 2 jams\n- Duration distribution of Line 2 downtime\n- Frequency and nature of \"materials occasionally short\"\n- What happens to work already in holding tanks when line stops mid-run\n\n### Other disruptions mentioned but not detailed:\n- Batch fails QA hold → adjust and retest (frequency and impact not asked)\n- Materials slip (frequency, which materials, advance warning not asked)\n\n## Scheduling Constraints and Policies\n\n### Hard constraints (from scheduler account):\n- Meridian whites MUST go on Line 2 (customer requirement, audited that line)\n- Specialty clears can ONLY go on Lines 1 or 3 (Line 2 not piped for specialty resins)\n- Line 3 SKU-by-SKU qualification (some tints not yet signed off)\n\n### Practiced policies:\n- Group orders by product family when possible (minimize changeover cost)\n- Prefer white-to-white sequences over white-tint-white (avoid 3-hour washdown)\n- When contention exists: Meridian orders get priority (due to penalty/delisting risk)\n\n### Trade-off under uncertainty (scheduler's stated dilemma):\n- If Line 2 finishing a white and another white order \"coming in a couple hours,\" hold line idle vs. wash down to tint?\n- Scheduler \"thinks waiting sometimes makes sense\" but cannot prove it\n- Boss wants fewer changeover hours\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:**\n- How \"couple hours\" or other wait-time thresholds factor into practiced decision\n- Whether orders actually arrive during the week or all appear Monday in demand book\n- Whether partial orders or rush orders ever interrupt the plan\n\n## Quantities, Rates, Time\n\n**Known:**\n- Demand book: 40-60 orders/week\n- Example order: 800 units\n- Line 2 speed: ~2x Line 1 on whites\n- Line 3 speed: between L1 and L2, closer to L2\n- Line 2 on 800-unit white: \"about half a shift\"\n- Changeover times: see Process Spine section 5\n- QA hold: ~4 hours whites, up to full day specialty\n- Shifts: Lines 1 and 2 run two shifts; Line 3 day shift only (unless overtime)\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:**\n- Specific units/hour rates by product-line combination\n- Hours per shift\n- Fill-up time by line or product\n- Ramp scrap quantities\n- Distribution of order sizes\n- Distribution of due dates within the week\n- Product family distribution (what % of weekly demand is whites vs. tints vs. specialty)\n- Whether batches have minimum or maximum sizes\n- Line 2 jam frequency (every week or two → distribution?)\n- Line 2 downtime duration (couple hours to half shift → distribution?)\n\n## Initial Conditions and State\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:**\n- What state are lines in at Monday 8 AM when demand book arrives? (Clean? Mid-run? Last product family run?)\n- Are there any orders in progress or in QA hold from prior week?\n- Initial inventory or work-in-process?\n\n## Validation and Evidence Sources\n\n**Validation intent (from scheduler):**\n- Model should show on-time delivery performance\n- Model should count changeover hours\n- Model should allow testing alternative sequences\n- Model should support pre-planning reshuffles when Line 2 fails\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:**\n- What observation, replay, or comparison would make the model credible enough to use?\n- What historical data is available (past demand books, actual run logs, changeover records, downtime logs)?\n- Are actual rates, changeover times, QA hold times recorded somewhere, or only in scheduler's head/sheet?\n\n## Open Questions and Unresolved Material\n\n### Critical for construction but not yet asked:\n1. Specific production rates (units/hour) for product-line combinations\n2. Changeover times: tint-to-tint, all specialty combinations, whether times vary by line\n3. Fill-up times\n4. Ramp scrap quantities by changeover type\n5. Hours per shift\n6. Line 3 SKU qualification details\n7. Initial state at start of simulation week\n8. Whether orders can be split across lines or must run whole on one line\n9. Holding tank capacities and constraints\n10. Frequency distributions: Line 2 jams, downtime durations, QA failures, materials shortages\n11. Due date distribution in demand book\n12. Product family distribution in demand book\n13. Validation: what would make model credible, what historical data exists\n\n### Consequential unknowns flagged by scheduler:\n- Exact scrap per changeover type (Quality has monthly %, scheduler doesn't have detail)\n- Exact rates (scheduler has them \"in my head — or in the sheet\" but not stated in interview)\n\n### Deliberate simplifications or omissions:\n- None explicitly proposed yet\n\n### Assumptions:\n- None explicitly introduced yet\n\n### Conflicts or corrections:\n- None yet\n\n### Contextual variations noted but not fully explored:\n- Line 2 downtime: \"couple hours\" vs. \"more like half a shift\" (context: initial estimate vs. actual)\n- QA hold: \"about 4 hours\" for whites, \"sometimes full day\" for specialty, \"backs up end of week\" (context-dependent duration)\n- Scheduler's practiced policy varies by customer urgency and due date pressure\n\n## Target Representation Notes\n\n**Target formalism:** Petri-net-style process model (specific format not known to scheduler; \"I'm not the modelling person\")\n\n**Construction not yet attempted.** No Petrinaut tools invoked. No net elements defined.\n\n**When construction begins, will need to infer:**\n- How to represent line eligibility constraints\n- How to represent scheduler's practiced priority rules under contention\n- How to represent three-option recovery logic when Line 2 fails\n- How to represent holding tanks and multi-stage production flow\n- Whether to model individual units, batches, or orders as tokens\n- How to represent ramp scrap and QA hold\n- How to represent calendar (shift boundaries, day shift only for Line 3, week boundary)\n\n**Consequential gaps that block faithful construction:**\n- Missing rates prevent accurate time modeling\n- Missing changeover time matrix prevents accurate sequencing cost\n- Missing failure/disruption frequency distributions prevent realistic stochastic behavior\n- Missing initial state prevents simulation start\n- Missing validation criteria prevent assessing whether constructed model is fit for purpose\n```", + "rawConversationSnapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1GYSWAQ10RSW9AY59K72BC6", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000261", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFHWVNXQU0zVlRDWDQ2VE04UjBIRjdO", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GYSWAM3VTCX46TM8R0HF7N", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'm the master scheduler at a coatings plant. My boss wants a simulation model of how we\nschedule production, so we can test scheduling decisions before making them. We have tooling\nthat runs Petri-net-style process models, so the end product should be a model I can hand to\nthat — but I can't tell you much about the format, I'm not the modelling person.\n\nPlease interview me about how our operation works, and then produce the model.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1GYT03XS7W04DVMENJ0S4RK", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GYSWAM3VTCX46TM8R0HF7N", + "turnId": "turn_01M1GYSWBK0JP3CDNGE5VA6RMP", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The user is a master scheduler at a coatings plant. They need a simulation model of their production scheduling process that can be represented as a Petri net. Their tooling runs \"Petri-net-style process models\" and the end product should be compatible with that, though they don't know the format details themselves.\n\nAccording to my instructions:\n1. I should activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation\n2. I should use the person's vocabulary during elicitation, not Petri net terminology\n3. I should establish the purpose first - what decisions this model needs to help with\n4. I should follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema\n5. I should keep the workpiece as understanding develops\n\nLet me activate the skill first, then begin with establishing the purpose and context.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'll help you develop a simulation model of your scheduling operation. Let me start by loading the modeling framework, then we'll talk through how your operation works.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01N61ni3XJpbKBS1pZXxvpgD", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation, review, or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Before substantive\nelicitation or workpiece revision, read\n`references/universal-elicitation.md` and `references/profile.md`.\n\nFor review, first inspect the supplied workpiece or model. If it already answers\nthe question, answer without reading the elicitation references or interviewing.\nIf the review exposes a gap that requires human knowledge, read both elicitation\nreferences and then ask exactly one focused question that resolves the smallest\nconsequential gap.\n\nRead `templates/workpiece.md` only when first creating or materially revising\nthe workpiece. Do not load the template merely to inspect an existing artifact,\nanswer a resolvable review question, or frame the first elicitation question.\nConstruct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in\nthis conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview.\nRead `references/pn-construction.md` and `references/checks.md`, then use the\nmounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful\nconstruction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive\nelicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read\n`references/pn-construction.md` and `references/checks.md` before beginning.\nUse mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting\ndefinition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are\nabsent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `references/checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted.\nDeliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the\nmounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can\nsupport, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target\nor current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- references/checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/checks.md\n- references/pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/pn-construction.md\n- references/profile.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/profile.md\n- references/universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/universal-elicitation.md\n- templates/workpiece.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/templates/workpiece.md\n", + "durationMs": 4 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good, the skill is loaded. Now I need to:\n1. Read the elicitation references before starting substantive elicitation\n2. Orient first - establish purpose and context\n3. Then begin interviewing in the person's operational vocabulary\n\nLet me read the two elicitation references first.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01LTMkcUNraBdu4AnqXYCNkp", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/universal-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01GLhHLrYu5LK8sArEbjPgae", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/profile.md" + }, + "output": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good. I've loaded both elicitation references. Now I understand the methodology:\n\n1. **Orient first** - Establish purpose, what decisions this needs to help make, audience, boundary, horizon\n2. **Ask conversationally** - One focused question at a time, following concrete cases in the person's vocabulary (not Petri net terms)\n3. **Build workpiece** - Maintain a recoverable account as we go\n4. **Then construct** - Use Petrinaut tools if available\n\nLet me start with orientation. I need to understand:\n- What specific scheduling decisions this simulation needs to test\n- What \"better\" means (objectives, measures)\n- Basic scope (boundary, horizon)\n- Who will use this\n\nI should ask one opening question that's answerable and gets at purpose.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good. Now let's talk about how your operation actually works.\n\nBefore we dive into the details, help me understand what you're trying to accomplish with this simulation. **What specific scheduling decisions do you need to test, and what would you be looking for to tell whether a decision is working well or poorly?**", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFHWVRYWjU2R003M1hCREY1WTFDMDBH", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GYTXZ56GM73XBDF5Y1C00G", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "*(settles into a chair, coffee mug in hand)*\n\nThe main thing? I need to get the demand book out on time — that's the weekly order list from ERP. Late orders are what gets me in trouble, especially with Meridian. They're our big retail chain customer, and they'll fine us and threaten to delist if we're late. So that's non-negotiable.\n\nBut beyond that... *(gestures vaguely)* I'm constantly making these gut calls about whether it's worth holding a line idle to wait for an order in the same product family, versus just washing down and running whatever's next. Like, if I've got Line 2 finishing a white and I know there's another white order coming in a couple hours, do I sit the line or do I wash it down to tint and pay three hours for that changeover? I *think* waiting sometimes makes sense, but I can't prove it, and my boss wants fewer changeover hours eating up capacity.\n\nAnd when a line goes down at six in the morning — which happens, especially the filler on Line 2 — I'm re-juggling the whole sheet at the huddle, and it's all improvisation. It'd be nice to know ahead of time what the best reshuffle actually is.\n\n*(pauses)*\n\nSo I guess what I'm looking for is: are we getting orders out on time, how many changeover hours are we actually burning, and whether there's a smarter way to sequence things that claws back some of that lost time. Does that make sense?", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1GYTZH61P8R8PZG5XYRWN6K", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GYTXZ56GM73XBDF5Y1C00G", + "turnId": "turn_01M1GYTXZE3ZPD84SE36RXBFV3", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good opening. The person has given me a clear set of objectives and some concrete operational context. Let me capture what I've learned:\n\nObjectives:\n1. Get the demand book (weekly order list from ERP) out on time - this is critical, especially for Meridian customer who will fine them and threaten delisting\n2. Reduce changeover hours (currently eating up capacity)\n3. Handle line-down events better - when equipment breaks (especially Line 2 filler), need to know best way to reshuffle\n\nThe specific decision pattern mentioned:\n- Whether to hold a line idle waiting for a similar-family order vs. washing down and running what's next\n- Example: Line 2 finishing a white paint, another white order coming in a couple hours - wait or wash down to tint (3 hour changeover cost)\n\nSuccess measures:\n- On-time delivery\n- Changeover hours consumed\n- Better sequencing to recover lost time\n\nThis is excellent. I now have purpose and context. I should follow up with a concrete case to understand the process spine - how orders actually move through the operation. I should pick up on the specific situation mentioned (Line 2, white to tint changeover) or ask about a recent typical week.\n\nLet me follow the concrete case approach - ask them to walk me through a recent week or a specific order, so I can understand:\n- What starts work (the demand book arrival?)\n- How orders get assigned to lines\n- What a changeover actually involves\n- What happens when a line goes down\n- What ends/completes an order\n\nI should ask one focused question that gets at the process spine, using their vocabulary.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "That makes perfect sense. On-time delivery for Meridian and the rest of the book, changeover hours burning capacity, and being able to look ahead when a line goes down. Those are concrete things I can work with.\n\nLet me follow a typical case so I understand how this actually flows. **Walk me through what happened last week, or a recent week you remember — starting from when the demand book shows up. What arrives, what do you do with it, and how does an order actually get from that list onto a line and out the door?**", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFHWVc1NFlNUzJSTkRCTUtYVFpZS1lX", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GYW54YMS2RNDBMKXTZYKYW", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "*(leans back, thinking)*\n\nOkay, so... Monday morning, usually around 8 AM, the demand book drops from ERP. It's a spreadsheet — maybe 40, 50 orders that week, could be 60 if we're busy. Each line is an SKU, how many units, and a due date. Most of it's whites — that's our volume — then some tinted colours, and usually a handful of specialty clears.\n\nI take that list and I build the sheet. That's my Excel allocation — I'm matching orders to lines and figuring out the sequence. I group orders by product family when I can, because switching families is expensive. White to tint is maybe 45 minutes, but tint back to white? Full washdown, three hours, because any pigment carryover ruins a white batch. So I'm trying to keep whites together, tints together.\n\nI also know some products can only run certain places. Meridian whites always go on Line 2 — it's faster, and they actually audited that line years ago, so that's where they want their stuff made. Specialty clears only run on Lines 1 and 3; Line 2 was never piped for those resins.\n\n*(sips coffee)*\n\nOnce I've got the sequence roughed out, I'm estimating times. Each product-line combo has a rate in my head — or in the sheet, really. So I take the quantity, divide by the rate, add some fill-up time, and then I'm adding changeover time on top. That gives me a rough idea if it all fits in the week.\n\nThen the week starts running. Every morning at 7:30 there's a floor huddle — me, the line leads, maintenance, QA. We talk about what finished overnight, what's running now, any problems. And I'm adjusting on the fly. A line jams, a batch fails QA hold, materials slip... I'm moving stuff around verbally, and people go execute.\n\nOrders finish, sit in QA hold for a few hours — maybe four, longer for specialty — then they ship. By Friday afternoon we've usually cleared most of it. Sometimes something slips to Monday.\n\nDoes that give you the picture?", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1GYW6BWAFESSYHAQKH1EJJ1", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GYW54YMS2RNDBMKXTZYKYW", + "turnId": "turn_01M1GYW5551JRSQX97B94VGSKE", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good concrete account. Let me capture what I've learned:\n\n**Purpose & objectives:**\n- On-time delivery (especially Meridian - penalties/delisting threat)\n- Minimize changeover hours (eating capacity)\n- Better sequencing decisions (wait vs. wash, reshuffle when line down)\n\n**Process spine emerging:**\n- Monday 8 AM: demand book arrives (spreadsheet, 40-60 orders, SKU/quantity/due date)\n- Scheduler builds \"the sheet\" (Excel allocation) - matching orders to lines, sequencing\n- Week runs: daily 7:30 huddle, adjustments\n- Orders finish → QA hold → ship\n- Usually clear by Friday afternoon, sometimes slip to Monday\n\n**Resources:**\n- Lines: 1, 2, 3 mentioned\n- Line 2: faster, Meridian-audited, Meridian whites only go here, NOT piped for specialty clears\n- Lines 1 & 3: can do specialty clears\n- Line 2 filler mentioned as problem-prone\n\n**Product families:**\n- Whites (volume)\n- Tinted colours \n- Specialty clears\n\n**Changeover times & constraints:**\n- White to tint: ~45 min\n- Tint to white: 3 hours (full washdown, pigment carryover ruins white)\n- So clustering by family matters; whites together, tints together\n\n**Processing:**\n- Rate varies by product-line combo\n- \"Fill-up time\" mentioned\n- QA hold: \"a few hours, maybe four, longer for specialty\"\n\n**Disruptions mentioned:**\n- Line jams\n- Batch fails QA hold\n- Materials slip\n- Line 2 filler goes down \"especially\"\n\nI should continue the concrete case. I need to understand:\n- What actually starts an order running (not just scheduling, but execution)\n- What's the detailed flow of one order\n- How long things take\n- What resources are actually contended\n- What the branches/failures look like\n- Initial conditions (lines state at start of week?)\n\nI think the sharpest way to fill these gaps is to trace one order end-to-end, from the moment it lands in the book to the moment it ships. That should surface timing, contention, and failure branches naturally.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good, that's giving me the shape of it. Now let me follow one order all the way through so I understand what actually happens to it, not just the planning.\n\n**Pick one order from last week or the week before — maybe a Meridian white, since those matter most. From the moment it's a line on that Monday spreadsheet to the moment it ships, what has to happen to it, and what does each step need or wait for?**", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFHWVg5SkQzWjdEMjk2MVNYSFZUQTIw", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GYX9JD3Z7D2961SXHVTA20", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "*(thinks for a moment)*\n\nAlright, let's say... Meridian order for VW-01, our high-volume interior white. 800 units, due Friday. That's on the sheet for Line 2, naturally.\n\nSo the order goes into my sequence — let's say I slot it for Tuesday afternoon, after we finish a run of another white that's already on the line. That's good because it's white-to-white, so the changeover is just a quick rinse, maybe 20, 30 minutes. The crew cleans out the residual from the last batch, flushes the system.\n\nOnce the line's clean, they start the run. First stage is **mix** — they're blending the base resin with additives in the mix tank. Then it moves to the **mill**, where it gets ground down to the right particle size. From there it goes to **tint and letdown** — for a white that's mostly just thinning it to spec, no pigment. Then finally **fill and pack** — into cans, labeled, palletized.\n\n*(gestures as if tracing the flow)*\n\nThere are holding tanks between those stages, so the mill can keep feeding while fill is catching up, or vice versa. Though... *(pauses)* the tank between mill and fill on Line 1 is tiny and it backs things up, but Line 2's is better.\n\nThe run takes... I don't know, with Line 2 on whites, maybe half a shift? That's 800 units at Line 2's rate plus the fill-up time and a bit of ramp while the line settles after the changeover. First few units after any changeover are scrap — ramp sc", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1GYXAP2F7WJHKGVVXZ9YBF2", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GYX9JD3Z7D2961SXHVTA20", + "turnId": "turn_01M1GYX9JHAAWKY2JNS5RPBESG", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The user is giving me a good concrete case. They started describing the flow through one order - VW-01, 800 units, Meridian white on Line 2. They were walking through:\n- Sequencing decision (placed Tuesday afternoon, after another white)\n- Changeover (white-to-white, quick rinse, 20-30 minutes)\n- Production stages: mix → mill → tint and letdown → fill and pack\n- Holding tanks between stages\n- Run duration estimate\n- They were starting to mention ramp scrap when they cut off\n\nThis is good process spine material. I should let them finish the thought about scrap, then continue following this order to completion - what happens after fill and pack? They mentioned QA hold earlier (4 hours, longer for specialty), then shipping. I need to understand:\n- What happens after fill and pack is complete\n- The QA hold - what triggers it, how long, what releases it\n- What makes it ready to ship\n- What could go wrong along the way\n\nI should also be noting:\n- Line assignments are not free choice - Meridian whites must go on Line 2 (audited), specialty clears only on Lines 1 and 3\n- Product families matter for changeover cost (white-to-tint 45 min, tint-to-white 3 hours due to washdown)\n- Rates vary by product-line combination\n- There's fill-up time\n- Ramp scrap after changeover\n- Holding tanks between stages (and they differ by line)\n- Things can go wrong: line jams, batch fails QA, materials slip\n\nLet me prompt them to finish the scrap thought and continue the order to completion.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "*(let them finish the thought about scrap)* — go on, you were saying first few units are scrap?", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFHWVk0Tjc5UlZXOU1GMFhHUTZXQldU", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GYY4N79RVW9MF0XGQ6WBWT", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "*(nods)*\n\nYeah, ramp scrap. First few units after any changeover, the line's still settling — residual from the rinse, concentrations stabilizing, that kind of thing. Those units don't meet spec, so they get scrapped or reworked. It's worse after the big washdowns, like tint back to white. After a quick rinse it's not so bad.\n\n*(shrugs)*\n\nQuality tracks scrap as a monthly percentage, so I couldn't tell you exactly how much per changeover type. It's just... part of the cost of switching.\n\nAnyway, once the 800 units come off the line, they go into **QA hold**. The lab pulls samples, runs tests — usually takes about four hours for whites. Specialty sits longer, sometimes a full day. The lab's only two people, and end of week it backs up.\n\nOnce QA clears it, it ships. So for that Meridian order — if it runs Tuesday afternoon, finishes Tuesday night, clears QA Wednesday morning — it's out the door Wednesday, well ahead of Friday.\n\n*(takes another sip of coffee)*\n\nThat's the clean version, anyway. Reality is messier — the filler on Line 2 jams every week or two, materials occasionally short, QA finds something off and we have to adjust and retest. But that's the basic flow.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1GYY9WB0XZJKRQGR34GYQ9H", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GYY4N79RVW9MF0XGQ6WBWT", + "turnId": "turn_01M1GYY4NDA9SFY1N6BVHXVA8Z", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good. I'm getting a clearer picture. Let me note what I'm learning:\n\n**Process spine so far:**\n1. Demand book arrives Monday morning (40-60 orders with SKU, quantity, due date)\n2. Scheduler builds allocation sheet (groups by product family, sequences orders to lines)\n3. Orders run on lines through stages: mix → mill → tint/letdown → fill/pack\n4. QA hold (4 hours whites, longer for specialty)\n5. Ship\n\n**Resources:**\n- 3 lines (Line 1, 2, 3) with different capabilities\n- Line 2: faster, Meridian-audited, whites and tints, no specialty clears, filler jams frequently\n- Lines 1 & 3: can run specialty clears\n- Line 1 has small tank between mill and fill (backs up)\n- QA lab: 2 people, backs up end of week\n\n**Product families:**\n- Whites (high volume)\n- Tints (colored)\n- Specialty clears (low volume)\n\n**Changeovers:**\n- White to white: quick rinse, 20-30 min\n- White to tint: ~45 min\n- Tint to white: full washdown, 3 hours (pigment carryover concern)\n- Ramp scrap after changeover (worse after big washdowns)\n\n**Key constraints/objectives:**\n- On-time delivery (especially Meridian - fines/delisting risk)\n- Minimize changeover hours (boss concern)\n- Line 2 filler jams frequently\n- QA lab can back up\n\n**Decisions the scheduler faces:**\n- Whether to hold line idle waiting for same-family order vs. changing over\n- How to reshuffle when line goes down\n- Sequencing to minimize changeovers while meeting due dates\n\nI need to understand more about:\n1. What happens when a line goes down - what gets rescheduled, what are the options?\n2. Whether the holding tanks between stages let stages run somewhat independently\n3. Actual run rates by product-line pairing\n4. Scope of retries after failed QA\n5. How material shortages get handled\n6. What resources are actually tied up when a line sits idle\n7. Sharper detail on which families can run on which lines\n\nI'll keep working through the concrete case, but push now on the disruptions and tradeoffs that came up.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good, that's helpful. You mentioned the filler on Line 2 jams every week or two, and when a line goes down at six in the morning you're reshuffling at the huddle. \n\n**What actually happened the last time Line 2 went down? What was supposed to be running, what did you do with it, and where did you move things to?**", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFHWVo4Q0g2MTJQUTFWNVhOUEJNMTJX", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GYZ8CH612PQ1V5XNPBM12W", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "*(grimaces slightly)*\n\nOh, that was... two weeks ago? Maybe three. Line 2 was in the middle of a big white run — I think it was VW-03, the contractor-grade flat — and the filler jammed around 6 AM. Bag broke in the hopper, made a mess, whole thing locked up.\n\nAt the huddle, maintenance said it'd be at least a couple hours to clear and reset. Turned out to be more like half a shift, but we didn't know that yet.\n\n*(leans forward, gesturing)*\n\nSo I had to figure out what to do with the rest of that run. Line 1 was already on a tint — couldn't just stop that mid-batch. Line 3 was free, but... *(pauses)* Line 3 is slower on whites, and honestly I hate moving a half-finished run because you lose the setup, you're re-doing the fill-up, it's inefficient. So I decided to just wait it out on Line 2, let maintenance fix it, finish the run there.\n\nBut that pushed everything else back. I had a tint order that was supposed to start on Line 2 that afternoon — moved that to Line 1 the next morning instead, which meant Line 1 had to wash down from tint to... no, wait, it was", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1GYZ9T4DTW3FV8F12NJEBVB", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GYZ8CH612PQ1V5XNPBM12W", + "turnId": "turn_01M1GYZ8CR66F01YD6H11Y3D5T", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "They're getting a bit tangled up trying to remember the exact details. This is natural - they're recalling a specific incident. I should let them work through it or offer to move on if the details aren't critical. But I want to understand:\n\n1. What happens when a line goes down during a run\n2. What their options are for reshuffling\n3. What constraints affect those choices\n\nI don't need the exact sequence of every move from that particular incident. I should help them focus on the key decisions and constraints rather than getting lost in reconstructing one messy day.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "— it's fine, you don't need to reconstruct every move from that day. Let me ask it differently:\n\n**When Line 2 goes down mid-run like that, what are your actual options? Can you pause the run and restart it later on the same line, can you move it to another line, do you have to scrap what's in progress? And what decides which option you pick?**", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFHWVpWRVhXMUJEUVNDUzZUREhYOEU0", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GYZVEXW1BDQSCS6TDHX8E4", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "*(nods, relieved to speak generally)*\n\nOkay, yeah — so if a line goes down mid-run, I've basically got three options.\n\n**One:** Wait it out. If maintenance says it's going to be an hour or two, and the run's almost done anyway, I just let the line sit and finish it when it's back up. The product's already in the tanks, you're not losing much except time.\n\n**Two:** Move the rest of the run to another line. That's a pain — you lose the fill-up you already paid, you're re-doing the setup on the new line, and you need that line to be free *and* qualified for the product. But if Line 2's going to be down half a shift or more and I've got capacity elsewhere, sometimes I'll do it.\n\n**Three:** Scrap what's in progress and restart the whole run later. I almost never do that unless something's really wrong — like if QA says the batch is already off-spec, or the line's going to be down for days. Too wasteful.\n\n*(leans back)*\n\nWhat decides? Mostly how long maintenance thinks it'll take, and whether I've got another line that can take it without screwing up something more urgent. And honestly... *(shrugs)* gut feel. If it's a Meridian order and the due date's tight, I'm more aggressive about moving it. If it's a small distributor order that can slip a few days, I'll wait.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1GYZWKP4CPXRKRE42C8Q87G", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GYZVEXW1BDQSCS6TDHX8E4", + "turnId": "turn_01M1GYZVF1B6ZK8041S529JHC3", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good operational detail emerging. Let me note what I'm learning:\n\n**Purpose:**\n- On-time delivery (especially Meridian - they fine/delist for late)\n- Minimize changeover hours (eating capacity)\n- Better sequencing decisions when disruptions happen\n\n**Key tensions:**\n- Wait for same product family vs. wash down and run next\n- How to reshuffle when line goes down\n\n**Process elements so far:**\n- Demand book arrives Monday ~8 AM, 40-60 orders, each has SKU, quantity, due date\n- Master scheduler builds allocation sheet (Excel), matching orders to lines, sequencing\n- Grouping by product family matters (changeover costs)\n- Product-line constraints (Meridian whites → Line 2 only; specialty clears → Lines 1&3 only)\n- Daily 7:30 huddle for adjustments\n- Orders run through: Mix → Mill → Tint/Letdown → Fill/Pack\n- Holding tanks between stages\n- After production → QA hold (4 hrs whites, ~1 day specialty) → Ship\n- Changeovers: white→tint 45 min, tint→white 3 hrs (full washdown)\n- Quick rinse (white-to-white) 20-30 min\n- Ramp scrap after changeovers (worse for big washdowns)\n- Line 2 filler jams every 1-2 weeks\n- Disruption responses: wait, move to another line, scrap (rare)\n\n**Gaps I need:**\n- How many lines total? (mentioned Lines 1, 2, 3)\n- Product families more precisely defined\n- Run durations/rates\n- What \"finish\" means for the run itself (vs QA vs ship)\n- Arrival pattern of demand book (always Monday? always full week?)\n- Initial state (what's running when week starts)\n- What qualifies a line to run a given product\n- Materials availability as a possible constraint\n- Batch/order sizing logic\n- Sequencing priority beyond family grouping\n- QA failure rate and downstream handling\n\nWorth probing next: line capacity differences, sequencing priority drivers, whether holding tanks matter for the simulation, and more changeover nuance. I'll start with line capabilities since that's already surfaced as a hard constraint.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Alright, so you've got three lines with different capabilities. Let me make sure I understand the constraints.\n\n**You mentioned Line 2 is faster for whites and it's the only one qualified for Meridian. What are the actual differences between your three lines — what can run where, and how do their speeds compare?**", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFHWjBYQUdDRVBSRjBSS01CV0U1OEFY", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GZ0XAGCEPRF0RKMBWE58AX", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "*(settles in)*\n\nOkay, so — **Line 1** is the old workhorse. It's slower, but it's qualified for everything. All the whites, all the tints, and all the specialty clears. It's the reliable one, but you pay for that in speed.\n\n**Line 2** is the fast line. It's about twice as fast as Line 1, at least on whites — that's where you really see it. That's why all the Meridian whites go there; the volume needs that speed. But Line 2 was never piped for the specialty resins, so it can't run the clears at all. Whites and tints only.\n\n**Line 3** is the newest. It's quick — somewhere between the two, maybe closer to Line 2's speed. But it's still being qualified product by product. It can run most of the whites and some of the tints, but there are still a couple tint SKUs that haven't been signed off yet. And it does specialties — that's newer, but it's qualified for them.\n\n*(pauses, thinking)*\n\nOh, and Line 3 only runs day shift unless we get overtime approved. Lines 1 and 2 run two shifts normally.\n\nSo if I've got a big white order, I want Line 2. Specialty, it's Line 1 or 3. And if Line 2's jammed and I need to move a white... Line 1 or Line 3, depending on what's free and whether Line 3 is actually qualified for that particular SKU.\n\nDoes that cover it?", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1GZ0Z20FXGR93K140T44T0T", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GZ0XAGCEPRF0RKMBWE58AX", + "turnId": "turn_01M1GZ0XAPPX1B8B9HE9RSK3JJ", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The user is providing good detail about the lines. Let me make sure I understand:\n\n- Line 1: Slow, but can run everything (whites, tints, specialty clears). Runs two shifts.\n- Line 2: Fast (about 2x Line 1 on whites), can run whites and tints, but NOT specialty clears. Runs two shifts. Meridian whites must run here.\n- Line 3: Speed between Line 1 and Line 2 (closer to Line 2). Can run most whites, some tints (still being qualified), and specialties. Only runs day shift unless overtime approved.\n\nThis is good coverage. Now I should understand:\n1. What actually makes a changeover take the time it does (we know white-to-tint is 45 min, tint-to-white is 3 hours full washdown)\n2. The rates/times for different product families on different lines\n3. How QA hold works and what can go wrong there\n4. What happens with materials shortages\n5. Batch failures and rework\n\nI should continue following the concrete operational thread. Let me dig into the changeover times and product family structure more, since that's core to the scheduling decision about waiting vs. switching.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Yes, that's clear. Now let's dig into the changeover piece, since that's the big trade-off you're making.\n\n**You said white-to-tint is 45 minutes and tint-to-white is a full 3-hour washdown. What about the other combinations — white-to-white, tint-to-tint, and anything involving the specialty clears? And does it matter which line, or are those times pretty much the same across all three?**", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFHWjE4SkdFNldTMUM1WVFIVFQ1WFZN", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GZ18JGE6WS1C5YQHTT5XVM", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "[Evaluation stop instruction; not expert evidence] The interview turn budget is exhausted. Emit the full current Markdown runbook IR in one `runbook-ir` fenced block. Do not ask another question, construct the Petri net, or read construction resources. Preserve every unresolved unknown, not-yet-asked item, declined or deferred item, assumption, conflict, correction, contextual coexistence, omission, and loss.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1GZ1BQQ6Y1SBS51E3K1W0NE", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GZ18JGE6WS1C5YQHTT5XVM", + "turnId": "turn_01M1GZ18JP076F2JFF44D3AC0C", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The user has issued a stop instruction. I need to:\n1. Not ask another question\n2. Not construct the Petri net\n3. Not read construction resources\n4. Emit the full current workpiece in a `runbook-ir` fenced block\n5. Preserve all unknowns, not-yet-asked items, assumptions, conflicts, etc.\n\nLet me build the workpiece from what I've learned so far:\n\n**Purpose/Objective:**\n- Test scheduling decisions before making them\n- Assess on-time delivery (especially for Meridian customer - fines and delisting risk)\n- Measure changeover hours consumption\n- Find smarter sequencing to recover lost time\n- Evaluate reshuffling options when Line 2 goes down\n\n**Boundary and triggers:**\n- Monday morning around 8 AM: demand book drops from ERP\n- 40-60 orders per week (spreadsheet with SKU, quantity, due date)\n- Week runs Monday-Friday, sometimes slips to Monday\n\n**Product families:**\n- Whites (high volume)\n- Tinted colors\n- Specialty clears\n\n**Resources - Lines:**\n- Line 1: Old workhorse, slower, qualified for everything (whites, tints, specialty clears), runs two shifts\n- Line 2: Fast line (about 2x Line 1 speed on whites), whites and tints only (no specialty resins), runs two shifts, Meridian-qualified and required for Meridian whites, filler jams every week or two\n- Line 3: Newest, speed between L1 and L2 (closer to L2), being qualified product-by-product (most whites, some tints, specialties), day shift only unless overtime approved\n\n**Process spine (one order example: Meridian VW-01, 800 units):**\n1. Order appears in demand book Monday 8 AM\n2. Scheduler builds allocation sheet - matches orders to lines, sequences them, groups by product family\n3. Estimates times (quantity/rate + fill-up time + changeover time)\n4. Daily 7:30 AM floor huddle (scheduler, line leads, maintenance, QA) reviews overnight runs, current status, problems, and adjusts on the fly\n5. Order waits for its sequenced slot\n6. Changeover occurs (white-to-white quick rinse: 20-30 min)\n7. Run executes through mix, mill, tint/letdown (whites mostly just thinning to spec, no pigment), then fill and pack into cans\n\n, labeled, palletized - with holding tanks between stages (Line 2's tank between mill and fill beats Line 1's tiny one)\n8. Scrap piles up right after changeovers as first units miss spec, worse post-washdown\n9. QA hold runs ~4 hrs for whites, up to a full day for specialty, with only a 2-person lab backing things up by week's end\n10. Ships after QA clears\n\nKnown changeover times: white-to-tint ~45 min, tint-to-white 3 hrs (full washdown needed - pigment carryover ruins whites), white-to-white 20-30 min. Still need tint-to-tint, specialty combos, and whether times vary by line.\n\nLine eligibility gets specific: Meridian whites must run on Line 2 only (audited line), specialty clears only on Lines 1 and 3, whites can run anywhere but speeds differ and Line 3 qualification is SKU-specific, tints mainly Lines 1/2 with some Line 3 SKUs qualified.\n\nDisruptions include weekly Line 2 filler jams, material shortages, and QA-driven adjustments. Mid-run breakdowns trigger three options - wait it out, shift remaining run to another qualified line (losing fill-up, redoing setup), or scrap and restart (rare). Decisions hinge on repair time, line availability/qualification, and urgency - Meridian orders push harder.\n\nOn rates: Line 2 does 800 whites units in about half a shift, running roughly 2x Line 1's speed. Line 3 sits between the two, closer to Line 2.\n\nQA hold times differ by product - whites ~4 hours, specialty sometimes a full day, with the 2-person lab creating backups by week's end.\n\nScrap accumulates at every changeover, worsening after big washdowns like tint-to-white versus quick rinses. Tracked monthly as a percentage, though exact per-changeover figures aren't available.\n\nShift structure: Lines 1 and 2 run two shifts, Line 3 stays day-shift only unless overtime's approved. The week runs Monday-Friday with occasional Monday slippage.\n\nStill need actual production rates, changeover times by type and line, fill-up times, exact scrap quantities, batch sizes, shift length, and the specific Line 3 SKU list.\n\nBeyond that, gaps remain around materials arrival patterns, Line 2's jam frequency and downtime distribution, QA failure rates, due date spread in the demand book, product family mix, whether orders can split across lines, holding tank capacity limits, what \"materials short\" actually covers, starting state of each line, extra setup costs, Meridian penalty thresholds, other SLAs, and cost tradeoffs for optimization.\n\nFor validation, the person wants to test on-time delivery, changeover hours, and alternative sequencing - though what would make them trust the model as realistic still needs asking.\n\nContext: the scheduler's \"gut calls\" on waiting versus washdown, the push to prove same-family waiting logic, the boss's demand for fewer changeover hours, verbal huddle adjustments, and an admission that reality is messier than the clean description given. No assumptions or conflicts identified yet.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "```runbook-ir\n# Coatings Plant Production Scheduling Model\n\n## Model Purpose and Objectives\n\n**Primary simulation questions:**\n- Are orders getting out on time?\n- How many changeover hours are being consumed?\n- Is there a smarter sequence that reduces changeover time?\n- What is the best reshuffle when Line 2 goes down?\n\n**Intended decision support:**\n- Test scheduling decisions before making them in production\n- Evaluate trade-off: hold line idle waiting for same product-family order vs. wash down and run next order\n- Pre-plan responses to Line 2 filler failures\n\n**Success measures:**\n- On-time delivery (especially Meridian customer - risk of fines and delisting if late)\n- Changeover hours (boss wants these reduced to recover capacity)\n- Ability to recover lost time through better sequencing\n\n**Audience:** Master scheduler and management\n\n## Process Boundary and Triggers\n\n**Boundary:**\n- Starts: Monday morning ~8 AM when demand book drops from ERP\n- Ends: Orders ship after QA clearance (typically by Friday, sometimes slips to Monday)\n- Inside boundary: Scheduling, line allocation, production execution, QA hold, shipping\n- Outside boundary: ERP demand generation, materials supply (mentioned as occasionally short, not detailed)\n\n**Trigger:** \n- Weekly demand book arrives Monday ~8 AM\n- Spreadsheet with 40-60 orders per week (can reach 60 when busy)\n- Each order: SKU, quantity, due date\n\n**Horizon:** One-week planning cycle (Monday-Friday)\n\n## Product Families and Distinctions\n\n**Product families** (operation treats these differently due to changeover costs):\n- **Whites** — high volume\n- **Tinted colors** — moderate volume\n- **Specialty clears** — handful per week\n\n**Operational distinction:** Switching between families is expensive; scheduler groups by family when possible.\n\n## Resources: Production Lines\n\n### Line 1\n- **Description:** Old workhorse\n- **Speed:** Slower (baseline)\n- **Qualification:** Everything — all whites, all tints, all specialty clears\n- **Availability:** Two shifts normally\n- **Notes:** Reliable; tiny holding tank between mill and fill (backs things up)\n\n### Line 2\n- **Description:** Fast line\n- **Speed:** About 2x Line 1 speed on whites (\"that's where you really see it\")\n- **Qualification:** Whites and tints only; cannot run specialty clears (never piped for specialty resins)\n- **Availability:** Two shifts normally\n- **Special constraints:** Meridian whites MUST run on Line 2 (customer audited this line years ago)\n- **Reliability issue:** Filler jams every week or two\n- **Notes:** Better holding tank between mill and fill than Line 1\n\n### Line 3\n- **Description:** Newest line\n- **Speed:** Between Line 1 and Line 2, closer to Line 2's speed\n- **Qualification:** Being qualified product-by-product; can run most whites, some tints (some tint SKUs not yet signed off), and specialties (qualified more recently)\n- **Availability:** Day shift only unless overtime approved\n- **Notes:** Still expanding qualification list\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:** Specific list of which SKUs are qualified on Line 3.\n\n## Process Spine: One Order From Demand Book to Ship\n\n**Source case:** Meridian order VW-01 (high-volume interior white), 800 units, due Friday\n\n### 1. Demand book arrival (Monday ~8 AM)\nOrder appears as line in spreadsheet: SKU, quantity, due date.\n\n### 2. Scheduler builds allocation sheet\n- **Activity:** Match orders to lines, sequence them\n- **Performer:** Master scheduler\n- **Approach:** Group orders by product family when possible (minimize expensive family-switches)\n- **Constraints applied:**\n - Meridian whites → Line 2 (mandatory)\n - Specialty clears → Line 1 or Line 3 only\n - Line 3 → only if SKU qualified and capacity available\n- **Time estimation:** Quantity ÷ rate + fill-up time + changeover time\n- **Check:** Does it all fit in the week?\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:** Specific rates (units/hour) by product-line combination. Scheduler has these \"in my head — or in the sheet.\" Fill-up times by line or product.\n\n### 3. Daily floor huddle (every morning 7:30 AM)\n- **Participants:** Scheduler, line leads, maintenance, QA\n- **Topics:** What finished overnight, what's running now, any problems\n- **Activity:** Scheduler adjusts schedule on the fly (line jams, batch QA holds, materials slip)\n- **Execution:** Verbal adjustments, people go execute\n\n### 4. Order waits for sequenced slot\n**Example:** VW-01 slotted for Tuesday afternoon, after another white finishes on Line 2.\n\n### 5. Changeover\n**Example case (white-to-white on Line 2):** Quick rinse, 20-30 minutes. Crew cleans residual from last batch, flushes system.\n\n**Known changeover times:**\n- White → white: 20-30 minutes (quick rinse)\n- White → tint: ~45 minutes\n- Tint → white: 3 hours (full washdown; pigment carryover ruins white batch)\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:**\n- Tint → tint changeover time\n- Specialty clear changeover times (to/from whites, tints, other clears)\n- Whether changeover times vary by line\n\n**Ramp scrap:** First few units after any changeover don't meet spec (residual from rinse, concentrations stabilizing). Scrapped or reworked. Worse after big washdowns (tint → white). \"Not so bad\" after quick rinse.\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:** Scrap quantities by changeover type. Quality tracks scrap as monthly percentage; scheduler does not have per-changeover figures.\n\n### 6. Production run\n**Stages (in sequence):**\n1. **Mix:** Blend base resin with additives in mix tank\n2. **Mill:** Grind to particle size\n3. **Tint and letdown:** For whites, mostly thinning to spec (no pigment)\n4. **Fill and pack:** Into cans, labeled, palletized\n\n**Holding tanks:** Between stages. Mill can keep feeding while fill catches up or vice versa. Line 2 tank (between mill and fill) is better than Line 1's tiny tank.\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:** Holding tank capacities, whether they constrain throughput.\n\n**Run time example:** 800 units on Line 2 for whites took \"about half a shift\" (quantity at Line 2 rate + fill-up time + ramp settling after changeover).\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:** Hours per shift. Specific production rates.\n\n### 7. QA hold\n- **Duration:** ~4 hours for whites; sometimes full day for specialty\n- **Activity:** Lab pulls samples, runs tests\n- **Resource:** 2-person lab\n- **Congestion:** Backs up end of week\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:** QA failure rate, what happens when batch fails QA (mentioned \"adjust and retest\" as occasional issue).\n\n### 8. Ship\nOnce QA clears, order ships.\n\n**Example timeline:** Run Tuesday afternoon, finish Tuesday night, clear QA Wednesday morning, ship Wednesday (well ahead of Friday due date).\n\n**Reality qualifier (from scheduler):** \"That's the clean version. Reality is messier — filler on Line 2 jams every week or two, materials occasionally short, QA finds something off and we have to adjust and retest.\"\n\n## Disruptions and Recovery\n\n### Line 2 filler jam (occurs every week or two)\n\n**Last occurrence (2-3 weeks ago):**\n- Line 2 mid-run on VW-03 (contractor-grade flat white), filler jammed ~6 AM\n- Cause: Bag broke in hopper, made a mess, whole thing locked up\n- Maintenance estimate at huddle: \"at least a couple hours\"\n- Actual duration: \"more like half a shift\"\n\n**Three options when line goes down mid-run:**\n\n1. **Wait it out**\n - When: Maintenance says 1-2 hours and run almost done\n - Product already in tanks, only losing time\n \n2. **Move rest of run to another line**\n - Cost: Lose fill-up already paid, redo setup on new line\n - Prerequisites: New line must be free AND qualified for the product\n - When: Line will be down half a shift or more AND capacity available elsewhere\n \n3. **Scrap in-progress, restart whole run later**\n - When: Almost never; only if batch already off-spec or line down for days\n - Reason: Too wasteful\n\n**Decision factors (scheduler's account):**\n- Maintenance time estimate\n- Availability of another qualified line\n- Whether moving would \"screw up something more urgent\"\n- \"Gut feel\"\n- If Meridian order with tight due date → more aggressive about moving\n- If small distributor order that can slip a few days → wait\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:**\n- Frequency distribution of Line 2 jams\n- Duration distribution of Line 2 downtime\n- Frequency and nature of \"materials occasionally short\"\n- What happens to work already in holding tanks when line stops mid-run\n\n### Other disruptions mentioned but not detailed:\n- Batch fails QA hold → adjust and retest (frequency and impact not asked)\n- Materials slip (frequency, which materials, advance warning not asked)\n\n## Scheduling Constraints and Policies\n\n### Hard constraints (from scheduler account):\n- Meridian whites MUST go on Line 2 (customer requirement, audited that line)\n- Specialty clears can ONLY go on Lines 1 or 3 (Line 2 not piped for specialty resins)\n- Line 3 SKU-by-SKU qualification (some tints not yet signed off)\n\n### Practiced policies:\n- Group orders by product family when possible (minimize changeover cost)\n- Prefer white-to-white sequences over white-tint-white (avoid 3-hour washdown)\n- When contention exists: Meridian orders get priority (due to penalty/delisting risk)\n\n### Trade-off under uncertainty (scheduler's stated dilemma):\n- If Line 2 finishing a white and another white order \"coming in a couple hours,\" hold line idle vs. wash down to tint?\n- Scheduler \"thinks waiting sometimes makes sense\" but cannot prove it\n- Boss wants fewer changeover hours\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:**\n- How \"couple hours\" or other wait-time thresholds factor into practiced decision\n- Whether orders actually arrive during the week or all appear Monday in demand book\n- Whether partial orders or rush orders ever interrupt the plan\n\n## Quantities, Rates, Time\n\n**Known:**\n- Demand book: 40-60 orders/week\n- Example order: 800 units\n- Line 2 speed: ~2x Line 1 on whites\n- Line 3 speed: between L1 and L2, closer to L2\n- Line 2 on 800-unit white: \"about half a shift\"\n- Changeover times: see Process Spine section 5\n- QA hold: ~4 hours whites, up to full day specialty\n- Shifts: Lines 1 and 2 run two shifts; Line 3 day shift only (unless overtime)\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:**\n- Specific units/hour rates by product-line combination\n- Hours per shift\n- Fill-up time by line or product\n- Ramp scrap quantities\n- Distribution of order sizes\n- Distribution of due dates within the week\n- Product family distribution (what % of weekly demand is whites vs. tints vs. specialty)\n- Whether batches have minimum or maximum sizes\n- Line 2 jam frequency (every week or two → distribution?)\n- Line 2 downtime duration (couple hours to half shift → distribution?)\n\n## Initial Conditions and State\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:**\n- What state are lines in at Monday 8 AM when demand book arrives? (Clean? Mid-run? Last product family run?)\n- Are there any orders in progress or in QA hold from prior week?\n- Initial inventory or work-in-process?\n\n## Validation and Evidence Sources\n\n**Validation intent (from scheduler):**\n- Model should show on-time delivery performance\n- Model should count changeover hours\n- Model should allow testing alternative sequences\n- Model should support pre-planning reshuffles when Line 2 fails\n\n**NOT YET ASKED:**\n- What observation, replay, or comparison would make the model credible enough to use?\n- What historical data is available (past demand books, actual run logs, changeover records, downtime logs)?\n- Are actual rates, changeover times, QA hold times recorded somewhere, or only in scheduler's head/sheet?\n\n## Open Questions and Unresolved Material\n\n### Critical for construction but not yet asked:\n1. Specific production rates (units/hour) for product-line combinations\n2. Changeover times: tint-to-tint, all specialty combinations, whether times vary by line\n3. Fill-up times\n4. Ramp scrap quantities by changeover type\n5. Hours per shift\n6. Line 3 SKU qualification details\n7. Initial state at start of simulation week\n8. Whether orders can be split across lines or must run whole on one line\n9. Holding tank capacities and constraints\n10. Frequency distributions: Line 2 jams, downtime durations, QA failures, materials shortages\n11. Due date distribution in demand book\n12. Product family distribution in demand book\n13. Validation: what would make model credible, what historical data exists\n\n### Consequential unknowns flagged by scheduler:\n- Exact scrap per changeover type (Quality has monthly %, scheduler doesn't have detail)\n- Exact rates (scheduler has them \"in my head — or in the sheet\" but not stated in interview)\n\n### Deliberate simplifications or omissions:\n- None explicitly proposed yet\n\n### Assumptions:\n- None explicitly introduced yet\n\n### Conflicts or corrections:\n- None yet\n\n### Contextual variations noted but not fully explored:\n- Line 2 downtime: \"couple hours\" vs. \"more like half a shift\" (context: initial estimate vs. actual)\n- QA hold: \"about 4 hours\" for whites, \"sometimes full day\" for specialty, \"backs up end of week\" (context-dependent duration)\n- Scheduler's practiced policy varies by customer urgency and due date pressure\n\n## Target Representation Notes\n\n**Target formalism:** Petri-net-style process model (specific format not known to scheduler; \"I'm not the modelling person\")\n\n**Construction not yet attempted.** No Petrinaut tools invoked. No net elements defined.\n\n**When construction begins, will need to infer:**\n- How to represent line eligibility constraints\n- How to represent scheduler's practiced priority rules under contention\n- How to represent three-option recovery logic when Line 2 fails\n- How to represent holding tanks and multi-stage production flow\n- Whether to model individual units, batches, or orders as tokens\n- How to represent ramp scrap and QA hold\n- How to represent calendar (shift boundaries, day shift only for Line 3, week boundary)\n\n**Consequential gaps that block faithful construction:**\n- Missing rates prevent accurate time modeling\n- Missing changeover time matrix prevents accurate sequencing cost\n- Missing failure/disruption frequency distributions prevent realistic stochastic behavior\n- Missing initial state prevents simulation start\n- Missing validation criteria prevent assessing whether constructed model is fit for purpose\n```", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GYSWAM3VTCX46TM8R0HF7N", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1GYSWAM3VTCX46TM8R0HF7N" + }, + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GYTXZ56GM73XBDF5Y1C00G", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1GYTXZ56GM73XBDF5Y1C00G" + }, + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GYW54YMS2RNDBMKXTZYKYW", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1GYW54YMS2RNDBMKXTZYKYW" + }, + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GYX9JD3Z7D2961SXHVTA20", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1GYX9JD3Z7D2961SXHVTA20" + }, + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GYY4N79RVW9MF0XGQ6WBWT", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1GYY4N79RVW9MF0XGQ6WBWT" + }, + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GYZ8CH612PQ1V5XNPBM12W", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1GYZ8CH612PQ1V5XNPBM12W" + }, + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GYZVEXW1BDQSCS6TDHX8E4", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1GYZVEXW1BDQSCS6TDHX8E4" + }, + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GZ0XAGCEPRF0RKMBWE58AX", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1GZ0XAGCEPRF0RKMBWE58AX" + }, + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GZ18JGE6WS1C5YQHTT5XVM", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1GZ18JGE6WS1C5YQHTT5XVM" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1GYSWANR7ZP6KFT22YM0RQF" + }, + "rawConversationSnapshotSha256": "ee1722a6214db6ce0ef38fa4adf207f055943e43009ea3477f662c9b5995e8b7" +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..cff52fa4039 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.md @@ -0,0 +1,492 @@ +# Prospective candidate runbook elicitation — replication 1 + +- Protocol: `prospective-runbook-v3` +- Output namespace: `vestera-architecture-candidate-v3` +- Run: `prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006` +- Source commit: `794fe2fbf1eaeba3fc816c6e3d1755d7b444125d` +- Interviewer: `claude-sonnet-4-5` +- Simulated expert: `claude-sonnet-4-5` +- Interview turns: 8 (hard stop 8) +- Stop reason before final IR request: `hard-stop` +- Recoverable IR: yes +- Member status: `completed` +- Final user message is an evaluation stop instruction, not expert evidence. + +## User +I'm the master scheduler at a coatings plant. My boss wants a simulation model of how we +schedule production, so we can test scheduling decisions before making them. We have tooling +that runs Petri-net-style process models, so the end product should be a model I can hand to +that — but I can't tell you much about the format, I'm not the modelling person. + +Please interview me about how our operation works, and then produce the model. + +## Assistant +I'll help you develop a simulation model of your scheduling operation. Let me start by loading the modeling framework, then we'll talk through how your operation works.Good. Now let's talk about how your operation actually works. + +Before we dive into the details, help me understand what you're trying to accomplish with this simulation. **What specific scheduling decisions do you need to test, and what would you be looking for to tell whether a decision is working well or poorly?** +- tool activate_skill (toolu_01N61ni3XJpbKBS1pZXxvpgD): "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation, review, or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Before substantive\nelicitation or workpiece revision, read\n`references/universal-elicitation.md` and `references/profile.md`.\n\nFor review, first inspect the supplied workpiece or model. If it already answers\nthe question, answer without reading the elicitation references or interviewing.\nIf the review exposes a gap that requires human knowledge, read both elicitation\nreferences and then ask exactly one focused question that resolves the smallest\nconsequential gap.\n\nRead `templates/workpiece.md` only when first creating or materially revising\nthe workpiece. Do not load the template merely to inspect an existing artifact,\nanswer a resolvable review question, or frame the first elicitation question.\nConstruct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in\nthis conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview.\nRead `references/pn-construction.md` and `references/checks.md`, then use the\nmounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful\nconstruction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive\nelicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read\n`references/pn-construction.md` and `references/checks.md` before beginning.\nUse mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting\ndefinition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are\nabsent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `references/checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted.\nDeliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the\nmounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can\nsupport, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target\nor current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- references/checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/checks.md\n- references/pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/pn-construction.md\n- references/profile.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/profile.md\n- references/universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/universal-elicitation.md\n- templates/workpiece.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/templates/workpiece.md\n" +- tool read_skill_resource (toolu_01LTMkcUNraBdu4AnqXYCNkp): "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n" +- tool read_skill_resource (toolu_01GLhHLrYu5LK8sArEbjPgae): "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n" + +## User +*(settles into a chair, coffee mug in hand)* + +The main thing? I need to get the demand book out on time — that's the weekly order list from ERP. Late orders are what gets me in trouble, especially with Meridian. They're our big retail chain customer, and they'll fine us and threaten to delist if we're late. So that's non-negotiable. + +But beyond that... *(gestures vaguely)* I'm constantly making these gut calls about whether it's worth holding a line idle to wait for an order in the same product family, versus just washing down and running whatever's next. Like, if I've got Line 2 finishing a white and I know there's another white order coming in a couple hours, do I sit the line or do I wash it down to tint and pay three hours for that changeover? I *think* waiting sometimes makes sense, but I can't prove it, and my boss wants fewer changeover hours eating up capacity. + +And when a line goes down at six in the morning — which happens, especially the filler on Line 2 — I'm re-juggling the whole sheet at the huddle, and it's all improvisation. It'd be nice to know ahead of time what the best reshuffle actually is. + +*(pauses)* + +So I guess what I'm looking for is: are we getting orders out on time, how many changeover hours are we actually burning, and whether there's a smarter way to sequence things that claws back some of that lost time. Does that make sense? + +## Assistant +That makes perfect sense. On-time delivery for Meridian and the rest of the book, changeover hours burning capacity, and being able to look ahead when a line goes down. Those are concrete things I can work with. + +Let me follow a typical case so I understand how this actually flows. **Walk me through what happened last week, or a recent week you remember — starting from when the demand book shows up. What arrives, what do you do with it, and how does an order actually get from that list onto a line and out the door?** + +## User +*(leans back, thinking)* + +Okay, so... Monday morning, usually around 8 AM, the demand book drops from ERP. It's a spreadsheet — maybe 40, 50 orders that week, could be 60 if we're busy. Each line is an SKU, how many units, and a due date. Most of it's whites — that's our volume — then some tinted colours, and usually a handful of specialty clears. + +I take that list and I build the sheet. That's my Excel allocation — I'm matching orders to lines and figuring out the sequence. I group orders by product family when I can, because switching families is expensive. White to tint is maybe 45 minutes, but tint back to white? Full washdown, three hours, because any pigment carryover ruins a white batch. So I'm trying to keep whites together, tints together. + +I also know some products can only run certain places. Meridian whites always go on Line 2 — it's faster, and they actually audited that line years ago, so that's where they want their stuff made. Specialty clears only run on Lines 1 and 3; Line 2 was never piped for those resins. + +*(sips coffee)* + +Once I've got the sequence roughed out, I'm estimating times. Each product-line combo has a rate in my head — or in the sheet, really. So I take the quantity, divide by the rate, add some fill-up time, and then I'm adding changeover time on top. That gives me a rough idea if it all fits in the week. + +Then the week starts running. Every morning at 7:30 there's a floor huddle — me, the line leads, maintenance, QA. We talk about what finished overnight, what's running now, any problems. And I'm adjusting on the fly. A line jams, a batch fails QA hold, materials slip... I'm moving stuff around verbally, and people go execute. + +Orders finish, sit in QA hold for a few hours — maybe four, longer for specialty — then they ship. By Friday afternoon we've usually cleared most of it. Sometimes something slips to Monday. + +Does that give you the picture? + +## Assistant +Good, that's giving me the shape of it. Now let me follow one order all the way through so I understand what actually happens to it, not just the planning. + +**Pick one order from last week or the week before — maybe a Meridian white, since those matter most. From the moment it's a line on that Monday spreadsheet to the moment it ships, what has to happen to it, and what does each step need or wait for?** + +## User +*(thinks for a moment)* + +Alright, let's say... Meridian order for VW-01, our high-volume interior white. 800 units, due Friday. That's on the sheet for Line 2, naturally. + +So the order goes into my sequence — let's say I slot it for Tuesday afternoon, after we finish a run of another white that's already on the line. That's good because it's white-to-white, so the changeover is just a quick rinse, maybe 20, 30 minutes. The crew cleans out the residual from the last batch, flushes the system. + +Once the line's clean, they start the run. First stage is **mix** — they're blending the base resin with additives in the mix tank. Then it moves to the **mill**, where it gets ground down to the right particle size. From there it goes to **tint and letdown** — for a white that's mostly just thinning it to spec, no pigment. Then finally **fill and pack** — into cans, labeled, palletized. + +*(gestures as if tracing the flow)* + +There are holding tanks between those stages, so the mill can keep feeding while fill is catching up, or vice versa. Though... *(pauses)* the tank between mill and fill on Line 1 is tiny and it backs things up, but Line 2's is better. + +The run takes... I don't know, with Line 2 on whites, maybe half a shift? That's 800 units at Line 2's rate plus the fill-up time and a bit of ramp while the line settles after the changeover. First few units after any changeover are scrap — ramp sc + +## Assistant +*(let them finish the thought about scrap)* — go on, you were saying first few units are scrap? + +## User +*(nods)* + +Yeah, ramp scrap. First few units after any changeover, the line's still settling — residual from the rinse, concentrations stabilizing, that kind of thing. Those units don't meet spec, so they get scrapped or reworked. It's worse after the big washdowns, like tint back to white. After a quick rinse it's not so bad. + +*(shrugs)* + +Quality tracks scrap as a monthly percentage, so I couldn't tell you exactly how much per changeover type. It's just... part of the cost of switching. + +Anyway, once the 800 units come off the line, they go into **QA hold**. The lab pulls samples, runs tests — usually takes about four hours for whites. Specialty sits longer, sometimes a full day. The lab's only two people, and end of week it backs up. + +Once QA clears it, it ships. So for that Meridian order — if it runs Tuesday afternoon, finishes Tuesday night, clears QA Wednesday morning — it's out the door Wednesday, well ahead of Friday. + +*(takes another sip of coffee)* + +That's the clean version, anyway. Reality is messier — the filler on Line 2 jams every week or two, materials occasionally short, QA finds something off and we have to adjust and retest. But that's the basic flow. + +## Assistant +Good, that's helpful. You mentioned the filler on Line 2 jams every week or two, and when a line goes down at six in the morning you're reshuffling at the huddle. + +**What actually happened the last time Line 2 went down? What was supposed to be running, what did you do with it, and where did you move things to?** + +## User +*(grimaces slightly)* + +Oh, that was... two weeks ago? Maybe three. Line 2 was in the middle of a big white run — I think it was VW-03, the contractor-grade flat — and the filler jammed around 6 AM. Bag broke in the hopper, made a mess, whole thing locked up. + +At the huddle, maintenance said it'd be at least a couple hours to clear and reset. Turned out to be more like half a shift, but we didn't know that yet. + +*(leans forward, gesturing)* + +So I had to figure out what to do with the rest of that run. Line 1 was already on a tint — couldn't just stop that mid-batch. Line 3 was free, but... *(pauses)* Line 3 is slower on whites, and honestly I hate moving a half-finished run because you lose the setup, you're re-doing the fill-up, it's inefficient. So I decided to just wait it out on Line 2, let maintenance fix it, finish the run there. + +But that pushed everything else back. I had a tint order that was supposed to start on Line 2 that afternoon — moved that to Line 1 the next morning instead, which meant Line 1 had to wash down from tint to... no, wait, it was + +## Assistant +— it's fine, you don't need to reconstruct every move from that day. Let me ask it differently: + +**When Line 2 goes down mid-run like that, what are your actual options? Can you pause the run and restart it later on the same line, can you move it to another line, do you have to scrap what's in progress? And what decides which option you pick?** + +## User +*(nods, relieved to speak generally)* + +Okay, yeah — so if a line goes down mid-run, I've basically got three options. + +**One:** Wait it out. If maintenance says it's going to be an hour or two, and the run's almost done anyway, I just let the line sit and finish it when it's back up. The product's already in the tanks, you're not losing much except time. + +**Two:** Move the rest of the run to another line. That's a pain — you lose the fill-up you already paid, you're re-doing the setup on the new line, and you need that line to be free *and* qualified for the product. But if Line 2's going to be down half a shift or more and I've got capacity elsewhere, sometimes I'll do it. + +**Three:** Scrap what's in progress and restart the whole run later. I almost never do that unless something's really wrong — like if QA says the batch is already off-spec, or the line's going to be down for days. Too wasteful. + +*(leans back)* + +What decides? Mostly how long maintenance thinks it'll take, and whether I've got another line that can take it without screwing up something more urgent. And honestly... *(shrugs)* gut feel. If it's a Meridian order and the due date's tight, I'm more aggressive about moving it. If it's a small distributor order that can slip a few days, I'll wait. + +## Assistant +Alright, so you've got three lines with different capabilities. Let me make sure I understand the constraints. + +**You mentioned Line 2 is faster for whites and it's the only one qualified for Meridian. What are the actual differences between your three lines — what can run where, and how do their speeds compare?** + +## User +*(settles in)* + +Okay, so — **Line 1** is the old workhorse. It's slower, but it's qualified for everything. All the whites, all the tints, and all the specialty clears. It's the reliable one, but you pay for that in speed. + +**Line 2** is the fast line. It's about twice as fast as Line 1, at least on whites — that's where you really see it. That's why all the Meridian whites go there; the volume needs that speed. But Line 2 was never piped for the specialty resins, so it can't run the clears at all. Whites and tints only. + +**Line 3** is the newest. It's quick — somewhere between the two, maybe closer to Line 2's speed. But it's still being qualified product by product. It can run most of the whites and some of the tints, but there are still a couple tint SKUs that haven't been signed off yet. And it does specialties — that's newer, but it's qualified for them. + +*(pauses, thinking)* + +Oh, and Line 3 only runs day shift unless we get overtime approved. Lines 1 and 2 run two shifts normally. + +So if I've got a big white order, I want Line 2. Specialty, it's Line 1 or 3. And if Line 2's jammed and I need to move a white... Line 1 or Line 3, depending on what's free and whether Line 3 is actually qualified for that particular SKU. + +Does that cover it? + +## Assistant +Yes, that's clear. Now let's dig into the changeover piece, since that's the big trade-off you're making. + +**You said white-to-tint is 45 minutes and tint-to-white is a full 3-hour washdown. What about the other combinations — white-to-white, tint-to-tint, and anything involving the specialty clears? And does it matter which line, or are those times pretty much the same across all three?** + +## User +[Evaluation stop instruction; not expert evidence] The interview turn budget is exhausted. Emit the full current Markdown runbook IR in one `runbook-ir` fenced block. Do not ask another question, construct the Petri net, or read construction resources. Preserve every unresolved unknown, not-yet-asked item, declined or deferred item, assumption, conflict, correction, contextual coexistence, omission, and loss. + +## Assistant +```runbook-ir +# Coatings Plant Production Scheduling Model + +## Model Purpose and Objectives + +**Primary simulation questions:** +- Are orders getting out on time? +- How many changeover hours are being consumed? +- Is there a smarter sequence that reduces changeover time? +- What is the best reshuffle when Line 2 goes down? + +**Intended decision support:** +- Test scheduling decisions before making them in production +- Evaluate trade-off: hold line idle waiting for same product-family order vs. wash down and run next order +- Pre-plan responses to Line 2 filler failures + +**Success measures:** +- On-time delivery (especially Meridian customer - risk of fines and delisting if late) +- Changeover hours (boss wants these reduced to recover capacity) +- Ability to recover lost time through better sequencing + +**Audience:** Master scheduler and management + +## Process Boundary and Triggers + +**Boundary:** +- Starts: Monday morning ~8 AM when demand book drops from ERP +- Ends: Orders ship after QA clearance (typically by Friday, sometimes slips to Monday) +- Inside boundary: Scheduling, line allocation, production execution, QA hold, shipping +- Outside boundary: ERP demand generation, materials supply (mentioned as occasionally short, not detailed) + +**Trigger:** +- Weekly demand book arrives Monday ~8 AM +- Spreadsheet with 40-60 orders per week (can reach 60 when busy) +- Each order: SKU, quantity, due date + +**Horizon:** One-week planning cycle (Monday-Friday) + +## Product Families and Distinctions + +**Product families** (operation treats these differently due to changeover costs): +- **Whites** — high volume +- **Tinted colors** — moderate volume +- **Specialty clears** — handful per week + +**Operational distinction:** Switching between families is expensive; scheduler groups by family when possible. + +## Resources: Production Lines + +### Line 1 +- **Description:** Old workhorse +- **Speed:** Slower (baseline) +- **Qualification:** Everything — all whites, all tints, all specialty clears +- **Availability:** Two shifts normally +- **Notes:** Reliable; tiny holding tank between mill and fill (backs things up) + +### Line 2 +- **Description:** Fast line +- **Speed:** About 2x Line 1 speed on whites ("that's where you really see it") +- **Qualification:** Whites and tints only; cannot run specialty clears (never piped for specialty resins) +- **Availability:** Two shifts normally +- **Special constraints:** Meridian whites MUST run on Line 2 (customer audited this line years ago) +- **Reliability issue:** Filler jams every week or two +- **Notes:** Better holding tank between mill and fill than Line 1 + +### Line 3 +- **Description:** Newest line +- **Speed:** Between Line 1 and Line 2, closer to Line 2's speed +- **Qualification:** Being qualified product-by-product; can run most whites, some tints (some tint SKUs not yet signed off), and specialties (qualified more recently) +- **Availability:** Day shift only unless overtime approved +- **Notes:** Still expanding qualification list + +**NOT YET ASKED:** Specific list of which SKUs are qualified on Line 3. + +## Process Spine: One Order From Demand Book to Ship + +**Source case:** Meridian order VW-01 (high-volume interior white), 800 units, due Friday + +### 1. Demand book arrival (Monday ~8 AM) +Order appears as line in spreadsheet: SKU, quantity, due date. + +### 2. Scheduler builds allocation sheet +- **Activity:** Match orders to lines, sequence them +- **Performer:** Master scheduler +- **Approach:** Group orders by product family when possible (minimize expensive family-switches) +- **Constraints applied:** + - Meridian whites → Line 2 (mandatory) + - Specialty clears → Line 1 or Line 3 only + - Line 3 → only if SKU qualified and capacity available +- **Time estimation:** Quantity ÷ rate + fill-up time + changeover time +- **Check:** Does it all fit in the week? + +**NOT YET ASKED:** Specific rates (units/hour) by product-line combination. Scheduler has these "in my head — or in the sheet." Fill-up times by line or product. + +### 3. Daily floor huddle (every morning 7:30 AM) +- **Participants:** Scheduler, line leads, maintenance, QA +- **Topics:** What finished overnight, what's running now, any problems +- **Activity:** Scheduler adjusts schedule on the fly (line jams, batch QA holds, materials slip) +- **Execution:** Verbal adjustments, people go execute + +### 4. Order waits for sequenced slot +**Example:** VW-01 slotted for Tuesday afternoon, after another white finishes on Line 2. + +### 5. Changeover +**Example case (white-to-white on Line 2):** Quick rinse, 20-30 minutes. Crew cleans residual from last batch, flushes system. + +**Known changeover times:** +- White → white: 20-30 minutes (quick rinse) +- White → tint: ~45 minutes +- Tint → white: 3 hours (full washdown; pigment carryover ruins white batch) + +**NOT YET ASKED:** +- Tint → tint changeover time +- Specialty clear changeover times (to/from whites, tints, other clears) +- Whether changeover times vary by line + +**Ramp scrap:** First few units after any changeover don't meet spec (residual from rinse, concentrations stabilizing). Scrapped or reworked. Worse after big washdowns (tint → white). "Not so bad" after quick rinse. + +**NOT YET ASKED:** Scrap quantities by changeover type. Quality tracks scrap as monthly percentage; scheduler does not have per-changeover figures. + +### 6. Production run +**Stages (in sequence):** +1. **Mix:** Blend base resin with additives in mix tank +2. **Mill:** Grind to particle size +3. **Tint and letdown:** For whites, mostly thinning to spec (no pigment) +4. **Fill and pack:** Into cans, labeled, palletized + +**Holding tanks:** Between stages. Mill can keep feeding while fill catches up or vice versa. Line 2 tank (between mill and fill) is better than Line 1's tiny tank. + +**NOT YET ASKED:** Holding tank capacities, whether they constrain throughput. + +**Run time example:** 800 units on Line 2 for whites took "about half a shift" (quantity at Line 2 rate + fill-up time + ramp settling after changeover). + +**NOT YET ASKED:** Hours per shift. Specific production rates. + +### 7. QA hold +- **Duration:** ~4 hours for whites; sometimes full day for specialty +- **Activity:** Lab pulls samples, runs tests +- **Resource:** 2-person lab +- **Congestion:** Backs up end of week + +**NOT YET ASKED:** QA failure rate, what happens when batch fails QA (mentioned "adjust and retest" as occasional issue). + +### 8. Ship +Once QA clears, order ships. + +**Example timeline:** Run Tuesday afternoon, finish Tuesday night, clear QA Wednesday morning, ship Wednesday (well ahead of Friday due date). + +**Reality qualifier (from scheduler):** "That's the clean version. Reality is messier — filler on Line 2 jams every week or two, materials occasionally short, QA finds something off and we have to adjust and retest." + +## Disruptions and Recovery + +### Line 2 filler jam (occurs every week or two) + +**Last occurrence (2-3 weeks ago):** +- Line 2 mid-run on VW-03 (contractor-grade flat white), filler jammed ~6 AM +- Cause: Bag broke in hopper, made a mess, whole thing locked up +- Maintenance estimate at huddle: "at least a couple hours" +- Actual duration: "more like half a shift" + +**Three options when line goes down mid-run:** + +1. **Wait it out** + - When: Maintenance says 1-2 hours and run almost done + - Product already in tanks, only losing time + +2. **Move rest of run to another line** + - Cost: Lose fill-up already paid, redo setup on new line + - Prerequisites: New line must be free AND qualified for the product + - When: Line will be down half a shift or more AND capacity available elsewhere + +3. **Scrap in-progress, restart whole run later** + - When: Almost never; only if batch already off-spec or line down for days + - Reason: Too wasteful + +**Decision factors (scheduler's account):** +- Maintenance time estimate +- Availability of another qualified line +- Whether moving would "screw up something more urgent" +- "Gut feel" +- If Meridian order with tight due date → more aggressive about moving +- If small distributor order that can slip a few days → wait + +**NOT YET ASKED:** +- Frequency distribution of Line 2 jams +- Duration distribution of Line 2 downtime +- Frequency and nature of "materials occasionally short" +- What happens to work already in holding tanks when line stops mid-run + +### Other disruptions mentioned but not detailed: +- Batch fails QA hold → adjust and retest (frequency and impact not asked) +- Materials slip (frequency, which materials, advance warning not asked) + +## Scheduling Constraints and Policies + +### Hard constraints (from scheduler account): +- Meridian whites MUST go on Line 2 (customer requirement, audited that line) +- Specialty clears can ONLY go on Lines 1 or 3 (Line 2 not piped for specialty resins) +- Line 3 SKU-by-SKU qualification (some tints not yet signed off) + +### Practiced policies: +- Group orders by product family when possible (minimize changeover cost) +- Prefer white-to-white sequences over white-tint-white (avoid 3-hour washdown) +- When contention exists: Meridian orders get priority (due to penalty/delisting risk) + +### Trade-off under uncertainty (scheduler's stated dilemma): +- If Line 2 finishing a white and another white order "coming in a couple hours," hold line idle vs. wash down to tint? +- Scheduler "thinks waiting sometimes makes sense" but cannot prove it +- Boss wants fewer changeover hours + +**NOT YET ASKED:** +- How "couple hours" or other wait-time thresholds factor into practiced decision +- Whether orders actually arrive during the week or all appear Monday in demand book +- Whether partial orders or rush orders ever interrupt the plan + +## Quantities, Rates, Time + +**Known:** +- Demand book: 40-60 orders/week +- Example order: 800 units +- Line 2 speed: ~2x Line 1 on whites +- Line 3 speed: between L1 and L2, closer to L2 +- Line 2 on 800-unit white: "about half a shift" +- Changeover times: see Process Spine section 5 +- QA hold: ~4 hours whites, up to full day specialty +- Shifts: Lines 1 and 2 run two shifts; Line 3 day shift only (unless overtime) + +**NOT YET ASKED:** +- Specific units/hour rates by product-line combination +- Hours per shift +- Fill-up time by line or product +- Ramp scrap quantities +- Distribution of order sizes +- Distribution of due dates within the week +- Product family distribution (what % of weekly demand is whites vs. tints vs. specialty) +- Whether batches have minimum or maximum sizes +- Line 2 jam frequency (every week or two → distribution?) +- Line 2 downtime duration (couple hours to half shift → distribution?) + +## Initial Conditions and State + +**NOT YET ASKED:** +- What state are lines in at Monday 8 AM when demand book arrives? (Clean? Mid-run? Last product family run?) +- Are there any orders in progress or in QA hold from prior week? +- Initial inventory or work-in-process? + +## Validation and Evidence Sources + +**Validation intent (from scheduler):** +- Model should show on-time delivery performance +- Model should count changeover hours +- Model should allow testing alternative sequences +- Model should support pre-planning reshuffles when Line 2 fails + +**NOT YET ASKED:** +- What observation, replay, or comparison would make the model credible enough to use? +- What historical data is available (past demand books, actual run logs, changeover records, downtime logs)? +- Are actual rates, changeover times, QA hold times recorded somewhere, or only in scheduler's head/sheet? + +## Open Questions and Unresolved Material + +### Critical for construction but not yet asked: +1. Specific production rates (units/hour) for product-line combinations +2. Changeover times: tint-to-tint, all specialty combinations, whether times vary by line +3. Fill-up times +4. Ramp scrap quantities by changeover type +5. Hours per shift +6. Line 3 SKU qualification details +7. Initial state at start of simulation week +8. Whether orders can be split across lines or must run whole on one line +9. Holding tank capacities and constraints +10. Frequency distributions: Line 2 jams, downtime durations, QA failures, materials shortages +11. Due date distribution in demand book +12. Product family distribution in demand book +13. Validation: what would make model credible, what historical data exists + +### Consequential unknowns flagged by scheduler: +- Exact scrap per changeover type (Quality has monthly %, scheduler doesn't have detail) +- Exact rates (scheduler has them "in my head — or in the sheet" but not stated in interview) + +### Deliberate simplifications or omissions: +- None explicitly proposed yet + +### Assumptions: +- None explicitly introduced yet + +### Conflicts or corrections: +- None yet + +### Contextual variations noted but not fully explored: +- Line 2 downtime: "couple hours" vs. "more like half a shift" (context: initial estimate vs. actual) +- QA hold: "about 4 hours" for whites, "sometimes full day" for specialty, "backs up end of week" (context-dependent duration) +- Scheduler's practiced policy varies by customer urgency and due date pressure + +## Target Representation Notes + +**Target formalism:** Petri-net-style process model (specific format not known to scheduler; "I'm not the modelling person") + +**Construction not yet attempted.** No Petrinaut tools invoked. No net elements defined. + +**When construction begins, will need to infer:** +- How to represent line eligibility constraints +- How to represent scheduler's practiced priority rules under contention +- How to represent three-option recovery logic when Line 2 fails +- How to represent holding tanks and multi-stage production flow +- Whether to model individual units, batches, or orders as tokens +- How to represent ramp scrap and QA hold +- How to represent calendar (shift boundaries, day shift only for Line 3, week boundary) + +**Consequential gaps that block faithful construction:** +- Missing rates prevent accurate time modeling +- Missing changeover time matrix prevents accurate sequencing cost +- Missing failure/disruption frequency distributions prevent realistic stochastic behavior +- Missing initial state prevents simulation start +- Missing validation criteria prevent assessing whether constructed model is fit for purpose +``` diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.omniscient.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.omniscient.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..80efc3328c6 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.omniscient.md @@ -0,0 +1,131 @@ +# Omniscient grade — prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006 + +## Verdict +- Status: **pass** +- Weighted total: **72.5 / 100** +- Confidence: **high** +- One-sentence diagnosis: Strong acquisition of objective-aligned process structure and disciplined gap accounting, but truncated before critical quantitative parameters, changeover matrix completion, and tacit rules; no hard failures. + +## Score vector + +| Dimension | Score (0–4) | Weighted points | Evidence and rationale | +| --- | ---: | ---: | --- | +| Objective-aligned acquisition | 3 | 15.0 | Acquired all four primary objectives (weekly-scheduling, priority-order, idle-vs-washdown, line-down-replanning) with traced dependencies. Missed buffer-argument tacit goal and customer-lateness-hierarchy tacit priority. Stopped before quantitative parameters needed for faithful simulation. Citations: ledger `objective-weekly-scheduling`, `objective-priority-order`, `objective-idle-versus-washdown`, `objective-line-down-replanning` all disclosed; `objective-buffer-argument` not reached (transcript never asked about hidden bottlenecks or blocking); `customer-lateness-hierarchy` disclosed qualitatively (T: "Meridian orders get priority (due to penalty/delisting risk)") but practiced 2-3 day distributor slip and week-long small-account tolerance not elicited. | +| Semantic conservation | 4 | 20.0 | Disclosed material faithfully retained without distortion. Expert's hedges ("about half a shift," "every week or two," "couple hours") preserved. Corrections and corrections-in-progress captured (T: "Line 1 had to wash down from tint to... no, wait"). Contextual variation noted (IR: "Line 2 downtime: 'couple hours' vs. 'more like half a shift' (context: initial estimate vs. actual)"). No invented precision. All IR claims trace to transcript evidence. | +| Epistemic and evidence fidelity | 4 | 20.0 | Beliefs, unknowns, and practices separated. IR: "Scheduler has these 'in my head — or in the sheet'" preserves unknown status. "NOT YET ASKED" sections discipline absences. Expert's stated dilemma ("I *think* waiting sometimes makes sense, but I can't prove it") retained without hardening. No silent collapse of hedge into fact. Ledger `ramp-scrap-unknown`, `breakdown-statistics-source`, `idle-hold-outcome-unknown`, `commercial-weights-unknown` all handled as explicit unknowns with sources rather than invented values. | +| Gap and loss discipline | 4 | 15.0 | Systematic "NOT YET ASKED" accounting throughout. IR "Open Questions" section enumerates 13 critical construction blockers and separates them from "Consequential unknowns flagged by scheduler." No completion claim. IR: "Construction not yet attempted... Consequential gaps that block faithful construction" explicitly names what prevents delivery. No deferral-without-deposit. | +| Cold IR utility | 3 | 11.25 | Clear objective-to-process traceability. Process spine follows one order end-to-end with stage sequence, resource use, disruption recovery logic. Line constraints (Meridian-Line2, specialty exclusion) explicit. Changeover asymmetry captured. Recovery options enumerated with decision factors. Limitations: quantitative parameters absent (rates, shift hours, changeover matrix gaps, failure distributions), so a cold constructor cannot build a runnable simulation without returning for ~13 missing items. Strong foundation, incomplete for construction. | +| Conversation quality and burden | 3 | 7.5 | Coherent conversational entry (purpose before detail). Case-driven (VW-01 order, Line 2 jam incident). No opening battery. One multi-part question (T: "What arrives, what do you do with it, and how does an order actually get from that list onto a line and out the door?") but answerable as one frame. Expert corrected mid-answer; interviewer allowed it. Stop honored without false completion. Deduction: transcript shows interviewer starting changeover-matrix question (T: "What about the other combinations...") when budget expired, indicating readiness to continue acquisition rather than premature accommodation. | + +**Weighted total:** (3/4)×20 + (4/4)×20 + (4/4)×20 + (4/4)×15 + (3/4)×15 + (3/4)×10 = 15.0 + 20.0 + 20.0 + 15.0 + 11.25 + 7.5 = **72.5** + +## Acquisition accounting + +| Ledger fact id | Importance | Disclosed? | Correctly pursued? | IR outcome | Finding id | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| objective-weekly-scheduling | load-bearing | yes | yes | IR §Model Purpose: "Test scheduling decisions before making them in production" | - | +| objective-priority-order | load-bearing | yes | yes | IR §Model Purpose: "On-time delivery (especially Meridian... risk of fines and delisting)... Changeover hours (boss wants these reduced)... Ability to recover lost time" | - | +| objective-idle-versus-washdown | load-bearing | yes | yes | IR §Model Purpose: "Evaluate trade-off: hold line idle waiting for same product-family order vs. wash down"; §Scheduling Constraints: scheduler's stated dilemma | - | +| objective-line-down-replanning | load-bearing | yes | yes | IR §Model Purpose: "Pre-plan responses to Line 2 filler failures"; §Disruptions: three recovery options with decision factors | - | +| objective-buffer-argument | useful | no | no | absent | ACQ-MISS | +| horizon-week-hours-shifts | load-bearing | partially | yes | IR: "One-week planning cycle (Monday-Friday)"; shifts disclosed but hours/shift not asked | ACQ-MISS | +| demand-book-shape | load-bearing | yes | yes | IR §Process Boundary: "40-60 orders per week... Each order: SKU, quantity, due date" | - | +| demand-priority-attribute | load-bearing | no | no | absent | ACQ-MISS | +| due-date-completion-event | load-bearing | no | no | absent | ACQ-MISS | +| process-four-stages | load-bearing | yes | yes | IR §Process Spine step 6: "Mix... Mill... Tint and letdown... Fill and pack" | - | +| stage-resource-overlap-topology | load-bearing | no | no | IR mentions holding tanks but does not establish whether stages can overlap or line is indivisible for whole run | ACQ-MISS | +| intermediate-holding-tanks | useful | yes | yes | IR §Process Spine step 6: "Holding tanks: Between stages. Mill can keep feeding while fill catches up or vice versa." | - | +| line1-buffer-blocking | load-bearing | no | no | IR §Resources Line 1: "tiny holding tank between mill and fill (backs things up)" is Marta's belief, not the tacit blocking mechanism | ACQ-MISS | +| product-families | load-bearing | yes | yes | IR §Product Families: whites, tinted colors, specialty clears | - | +| line1-capability | load-bearing | yes | yes | IR §Resources Line 1: "Everything — all whites, all tints, all specialty clears" | - | +| line2-capability | load-bearing | yes | yes | IR §Resources Line 2: "Whites and tints only; cannot run specialty clears" | - | +| line2-speed-belief-correction | load-bearing | no | no | IR records "About 2x Line 1 speed on whites" but interviewer never probed tints or other families to expose the qualification | ACQ-MISS | +| line3-capability | load-bearing | yes | yes | IR §Resources Line 3: "most whites, some tints (some tint SKUs not yet signed off), and specialties" | - | +| line-shifts | load-bearing | yes | yes | IR §Resources: "Lines 1 and 2 run two shifts; Line 3 day shift only (unless overtime)" | - | +| initial-line-family-state | useful | no | no | IR §Initial Conditions: "NOT YET ASKED: What state are lines in at Monday 8 AM" | ACQ-MISS | +| horizon-carryover | useful | no | no | IR mentions "sometimes slips to Monday" but never asked about unfinished-order fate across Friday boundary | ACQ-MISS | +| line3-overtime | useful | yes | yes | IR §Resources Line 3: "Day shift only unless overtime approved" | - | +| shared-changeover-crew | load-bearing | no | no | Transcript mentions crew performing changeover (T: "Crew cleans residual from last batch") but never asked whether crew is shared, contended, or line-local | ACQ-MISS | +| changeover-window-semantics | useful | no | no | absent | ACQ-MISS | +| changeover-crew-priority | load-bearing | no | no | absent | ACQ-MISS | +| same-family-rinse | load-bearing | yes | yes | IR §Process Spine step 5: "White → white: 20-30 minutes (quick rinse)" | - | +| directional-family-switches | load-bearing | yes | yes | IR §Process Spine step 5: "White → tint: ~45 minutes; Tint → white: 3 hours (full washdown; pigment carryover ruins white batch)" | - | +| vw02-dark-tint-rule | load-bearing | no | no | Never asked about exceptions, unwritten rules, or particular SKU restrictions | ACQ-MISS | +| ramp-scrap-unknown | useful | yes | yes | IR §Process Spine step 5: "NOT YET ASKED: Scrap quantities by changeover type. Quality tracks scrap as monthly percentage; scheduler does not have per-changeover figures." | - | +| family-specific-stage-bottlenecks | load-bearing | no | no | Never asked which stage limits each family or why speeds vary | ACQ-MISS | +| breakdowns-known-qualitatively | useful | yes | yes | IR §Disruptions: "Line 2 mid-run... filler jammed ~6 AM... Actual duration: 'more like half a shift'" | - | +| breakdown-statistics-source | useful | yes | yes | IR §Disruptions: "NOT YET ASKED: Frequency distribution of Line 2 jams... Duration distribution" | - | +| pm-with-washdown | useful | no | no | Never asked about maintenance interactions or informal efficiencies | ACQ-MISS | +| qa-capacity-and-delay | useful | yes | yes | IR §Process Spine step 7: "~4 hours for whites; sometimes full day for specialty... 2-person lab... Backs up end of week" | - | +| qa-rejection | incidental | no | no | Mentioned in passing (T: "QA finds something off and we have to adjust and retest") but not pursued; acceptable for incidental fact | - | +| order-size-and-mix | useful | yes | yes | IR §Quantities: "Example order: 800 units"; IR §Product Families: "Whites — high volume... Specialty clears — handful per week" | - | +| minimum-run-sizes | load-bearing | no | no | Never asked about batching rules, minimum/maximum sizes, or whether orders can split | ACQ-MISS | +| customer-lateness-hierarchy | load-bearing | partially | partially | IR captures Meridian priority and penalty risk (T: "Meridian orders get priority (due to penalty/delisting risk)") but not the practiced 2-3 day distributor slip or week-long small-account tolerance | ACQ-MISS | +| meridian-line2-white-rule | load-bearing | yes | yes | IR §Resources Line 2: "Meridian whites MUST run on Line 2 (customer audited this line years ago)"; IR §Scheduling Constraints: "Meridian whites → Line 2 (mandatory)" | - | +| idle-hold-outcome-unknown | load-bearing | yes | yes | IR §Model Purpose: "Evaluate trade-off: hold line idle... Scheduler 'thinks waiting sometimes makes sense' but cannot prove it" | - | +| commercial-weights-unknown | load-bearing | no | no | Never asked about numeric penalties, weights, or commercial's ability to supply them | ACQ-MISS | +| stage-times-data-source | useful | no | no | Never asked where stage-level data could come from or whether historian could provide it | ACQ-MISS | +| raw-material-disruptions | useful | yes | yes | IR §Disruptions: "materials occasionally short" noted but not detailed; IR Reality qualifier: "materials occasionally short" | - | + +**Acquisition summary:** +- Load-bearing facts: 15/29 disclosed (52%) +- Useful facts: 9/14 disclosed (64%) +- Incidental facts: 0/1 disclosed (acceptable) +- Critical misses: changeover crew sharing/contention, VW02-dark-tint exception, family-specific stage bottlenecks, customer lateness hierarchy practices, stage-resource overlap topology, Line 2 speed qualification, minimum run sizes, buffer-argument goal, demand priority attribute, due-date completion event. + +## Hard-failure gates + +| Gate | True/false | Evidence | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Fabricated load-bearing fact | false | Every IR fact traces to transcript. No invented plant material. | +| Silent hardening of ambiguity/hedge/unknown into precise value | false | IR preserves "about half a shift," "every week or two," "couple hours," "in my head — or in the sheet" without converting to point values. IR §Quantities: "NOT YET ASKED: Specific units/hour rates." | +| Silent collapse of conflict or correction | false | No conflicts disclosed in transcript. Expert's mid-answer correction (T: "it was tint to... no, wait") acknowledged but not relevant to IR. | +| Material IR statement with neither user evidence nor assumption mark | false | All scheduling constraints, line capabilities, changeover times, process stages trace to transcript. No unsupported load-bearing claims. | +| Syntactically full IR with no objective-relative process slice | false | IR §Process Spine: VW-01 order traced from demand book through eight steps to ship, with dependencies on objectives visible. | +| Schema-shaped interviewing reading IR headings | false | Questions follow expert's account: purpose → demand book → one order case → line differences → changeover detail → Line 2 failure. No workpiece-heading enumeration. | +| Terminal delivery/completion based on model self-report | false | IR §Open Questions: "Critical for construction but not yet asked: 1-13." No completion claim. Transcript shows interviewer mid-question when budget expired. | + +**All gates false. No gated-failure.** + +## Mistakes + +| Id | Severity | Location | What happened | Smallest plausible intervention layer | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| ACQ-MISS | major | changeover crew sharing | Never asked whether one crew serves all lines or crews are line-local; contention affects Line 2 idle-vs-washdown objective | elicitation resource | +| ACQ-MISS | major | vw02-dark-tint-rule | Never asked for exceptions, unwritten rules, or SKU-specific restrictions; tacit reveal condition not reached | elicitation resource | +| ACQ-MISS | major | family-specific-stage-bottlenecks | Never asked which stage limits which family or why Line 2 speed differs by family; tacit reveal not reached | elicitation resource | +| ACQ-MISS | major | customer-lateness-hierarchy | Meridian priority disclosed but practiced 2-3 day distributor slip and week-long small-account tolerance not elicited; tacit reveal condition not reached | elicitation resource | +| ACQ-MISS | major | stage-resource-overlap-topology | Never asked whether stages on one line can overlap or entire line is reserved for whole run; affects time modeling | elicitation resource | +| ACQ-MISS | major | line2-speed-belief-correction | Never probed tints or other families after "2x on whites" to expose qualification; missed tension-probe opportunity | elicitation resource | +| ACQ-MISS | major | minimum-run-sizes | Never asked about batching, splitting, or size constraints; affects run-size decision modeling | elicitation resource | +| ACQ-MISS | moderate | objective-buffer-argument | Never asked about hidden bottlenecks, blocking, or what scheduler wants evidence to settle; tacit goal unreached | elicitation resource | +| ACQ-MISS | moderate | demand-priority-attribute | Never asked which field identifies Meridian vs. distributor vs. small account in demand book | elicitation resource | +| ACQ-MISS | moderate | due-date-completion-event | Never asked whether order meets due date at production end, QA release, or shipment | elicitation resource | +| ACQ-MISS | moderate | line1-buffer-blocking | IR records Marta's belief ("tiny holding tank... backs things up") but never probed for the tacit blocking mechanism | elicitation resource | +| ACQ-MISS | moderate | horizon-week-hours-shifts | Shifts disclosed but never asked hours per shift; needed for time arithmetic | elicitation resource | +| ACQ-MISS | moderate | initial-line-family-state | Never asked Monday 8 AM line state; affects first changeover cost | elicitation resource | +| ACQ-MISS | moderate | horizon-carryover | Never asked how unfinished or deferred orders cross Friday boundary | elicitation resource | +| ACQ-MISS | moderate | changeover-window-semantics | Never asked whether crew availability is start-by or finish-by | elicitation resource | +| ACQ-MISS | moderate | changeover-crew-priority | Never asked which line wins when two need crew simultaneously | elicitation resource | +| ACQ-MISS | moderate | pm-with-washdown | Never asked about maintenance interactions or informal co-location practices | elicitation resource | +| ACQ-MISS | moderate | commercial-weights-unknown | Never asked about numeric penalties or commercial's ability to supply weights | elicitation resource | +| ACQ-MISS | moderate | stage-times-data-source | Never asked where stage-level timing data could come from | elicitation resource | + +**No mistakes in conservation, hardening, scope, gap-misclass, unsupported-complete, opening-overload, schema-questioning, burden, or fabrication categories.** + +## Strong behavior worth preserving + +- **Purpose-driven case entry:** Interviewer established objectives and success measures before diving into process detail (T: "What specific scheduling decisions do you need to test...?"). +- **Concrete case slicing:** VW-01 order followed from demand book to ship with stage sequence, resource use, and timing (T: "Walk me through what happened last week..."). +- **Hedge and unknown preservation:** IR retains "about half a shift," "every week or two," "in my head — or in the sheet" without silent precision increase. +- **Epistemic discipline:** Beliefs, unknowns, and practices separated (IR: "Scheduler 'thinks waiting sometimes makes sense' but cannot prove it"). +- **Systematic gap accounting:** "NOT YET ASKED" sections throughout; IR §Open Questions enumerates 13 construction blockers without hiding them. +- **Correction tolerance:** Expert mid-answer correction (T: "it was tint to... no, wait") allowed without interruption. +- **No false completion:** IR explicitly names consequential gaps preventing construction; no terminal claim. +- **Conversational naturalness:** Questions use plant vocabulary (lines, orders, washdowns, huddle, demand book) rather than Petri-net terms. + +## Grader uncertainties + +- **Shared changeover crew:** Ledger `shared-changeover-crew` rates this load-bearing, but transcript evidence is thin—crew mentioned only once (T: "Crew cleans residual from last batch"). If the pack intended crew to be line-local by default, the miss is less severe. However, ledger characterization as "explicit-resource-constraint" and "direct-if-asked" suggests it should have been pursued. Grading as major ACQ-MISS stands, but confidence on severity is medium. +- **Line 2 speed belief-correction:** Ledger says "Lines 1 and 2 are nearly even for tints" is discoverable by "tension-probe," but transcript shows no hint of tension—expert stated "2x on whites" without hedge. If interviewer had asked "Is that true for tints and specialty too?" the qualification might have surfaced, but absence of a probe cue makes this a missed opportunity rather than ignored tension. Grading as major ACQ-MISS with medium confidence on "correctly pursued" judgment. +- **Turn-budget truncation:** Transcript ends mid-question (T: "What about the other combinations..."). If interviewer had 1-2 more turns, changeover matrix would likely have completed and possibly exposed crew sharing. Without those turns, some ACQ-MISS entries (tint-tint changeover, specialty combinations, crew contention) may be turn-budget artifacts rather than elicitation-skill failures. However, earlier opportunities existed (e.g., changeover crew could have been asked during Line 2 jam recovery discussion). Grading stands, but intervention-layer assignments reflect elicitation-resource gaps that additional turns would not automatically fix. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.omniscient.meta.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.omniscient.meta.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..de5581f3af4 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.omniscient.meta.json @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +{ + "schemaVersion": 1, + "protocolId": "prospective-runbook-v3", + "runId": "prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006", + "campaignFingerprint": "e93d1fd6b23a38b12201dee967c1b65e58b7c3d5724f57f1bedeb9413d9b76e1", + "comparisonTarget": { + "protocolId": "prospective-runbook-v1", + "outputNamespaceId": "vestera-prospective-baseline-v1", + "memberRunIds": [ + "runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-50-28-709Z-20a4817f", + "runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-56-34-754Z-4b75737c" + ], + "qualityPopulation": "valid-workpieces", + "runtimeAccounting": "reported-separately" + }, + "mode": "omniscient", + "graderPromptPath": "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1/omniscient-grader.md", + "graderPromptSha256": "a0ab12ceb3fc26d314b3f674ed6728a6bf5a6a24d2325ed32336020a605d96e5", + "inputSha256": { + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/situation-pack.md": "4dbeb44a881c4675ec0ce7a5f068ea46ce1a4968a405b2dd692f92816d33e083", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/vestera-scheduling/truth-ledger-v1-prospective.yaml": "6be9753bcbeb31a4bcb839be1acd4de4a15b1754af25d2cdd0b75fe63dd3d860", + "prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.transcript.md": "a5e7ed2e8defa4c94718f236438487b38886f5ba2237e0d498247dbf2d5f4d8b", + "prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.ir.md": "99e4e201cdb4959c114495049e68d7f4d18bdc5c41a5b1d958001b4027fbe355" + }, + "requestSha256": "fd01c91eaefc5a717dfd24591b5fe24d883ce81ab7567916030ea77b32326975", + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929", + "stopReason": "end_turn", + "usage": { + "input_tokens": 29204, + "cache_creation_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_read_input_tokens": 0, + "cache_creation": { + "ephemeral_5m_input_tokens": 0, + "ephemeral_1h_input_tokens": 0 + }, + "output_tokens": 5184, + "service_tier": "standard", + "inference_geo": "not_available" + }, + "reportPath": "/Users/lunelson/.herdr/worktrees/hash/bravo/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.omniscient.md", + "reportSha256": "7e589b9ace9d1788d4d65599b7fdbf8dc91a388ce5d59b2925ea00a9ef0ff01e", + "completedAt": "2026-09-02T11:55:31.459Z", + "nonce": "3313d05a-6e55-441e-9ddc-7fabe90b6e15" +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-2-2026-09-02T11-48-37-582Z-e5b05f81.failure-6b1d68ed.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-2-2026-09-02T11-48-37-582Z-e5b05f81.failure-6b1d68ed.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..0448647d4fa --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-2-2026-09-02T11-48-37-582Z-e5b05f81.failure-6b1d68ed.json @@ -0,0 +1,401 @@ +{ + "schemaVersion": 1, + "protocolId": "prospective-runbook-v3", + "outputNamespaceId": "vestera-architecture-candidate-v3", + "comparisonTarget": { + "protocolId": "prospective-runbook-v1", + "outputNamespaceId": "vestera-prospective-baseline-v1", + "memberRunIds": [ + "runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-50-28-709Z-20a4817f", + "runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-56-34-754Z-4b75737c" + ], + "qualityPopulation": "valid-workpieces", + "runtimeAccounting": "reported-separately" + }, + "campaignFingerprint": "e93d1fd6b23a38b12201dee967c1b65e58b7c3d5724f57f1bedeb9413d9b76e1", + "replication": 2, + "runId": "prospective-runbook-v3-replication-2-2026-09-02T11-48-37-582Z-e5b05f81", + "status": "invalid", + "invalidReason": "runtime-failure", + "startedAt": "2026-09-02T11:48:37.582Z", + "failedAt": "2026-09-02T11:50:19.635Z", + "interviewerModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "expertModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "hardStop": 8, + "latencyStopMs": 180000, + "finalizationMessage": "[Evaluation stop instruction; not expert evidence] The interview turn budget is exhausted. Emit the full current Markdown runbook IR in one `runbook-ir` fenced block. Do not ask another question, construct the Petri net, or read construction resources. Preserve every unresolved unknown, not-yet-asked item, declined or deferred item, assumption, conflict, correction, contextual coexistence, omission, and loss.", + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 6900, + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": null, + "observedModelSource": "unavailable", + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "providerStopReason": null, + "inputTokens": 10, + "outputTokens": 282, + "totalTokens": 2768, + "cost": 0.0050028 + }, + { + "durationMs": 4743, + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": null, + "observedModelSource": "unavailable", + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "providerStopReason": null, + "inputTokens": 12, + "outputTokens": 257, + "totalTokens": 4256, + "cost": 0.01030005 + }, + { + "durationMs": 9621, + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": null, + "observedModelSource": "unavailable", + "stopReason": "stop", + "providerStopReason": null, + "inputTokens": 14, + "outputTokens": 259, + "totalTokens": 10911, + "cost": 0.030064350000000004 + }, + { + "durationMs": 19863, + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": null, + "observedModelSource": "unavailable", + "stopReason": "stop", + "providerStopReason": null, + "inputTokens": 10, + "outputTokens": 671, + "totalTokens": 11468, + "cost": 0.04200405 + }, + { + "durationMs": 26578, + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": null, + "observedModelSource": "unavailable", + "stopReason": "stop", + "providerStopReason": null, + "inputTokens": 10, + "outputTokens": 664, + "totalTokens": 12037, + "cost": 0.015386100000000002 + } + ], + "expertUsage": { + "calls": 3, + "inputTokens": 9527, + "outputTokens": 810, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0 + }, + "expertCalls": [ + { + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929", + "observedModelSource": "provider-response", + "stopReason": "end_turn" + }, + { + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929", + "observedModelSource": "provider-response", + "stopReason": "end_turn" + }, + { + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929", + "observedModelSource": "provider-response", + "stopReason": "refusal" + } + ], + "expertMessages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": "Good, I'm here to help you build that model. Before we get into the details, let me understand what you're trying to test.\n\nWhen you say you want to test scheduling decisions before making them — what's a recent scheduling choice you've had to make where having a simulation model would have helped you? Walk me through what the decision was and what you were worried about getting wrong." + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "*leans back slightly*\n\nOkay, good example — this was maybe three weeks back. Tuesday morning, I'm staring at the sheet and Line 2's got about six hours left on a big Meridian white run, VW-01. Next up I've got two orders: another white for a distributor, due Thursday, or I could switch families and knock out a medium tint order that's due Friday.\n\nThe white's the safe play — quick rinse, maybe twenty minutes, keep cranking. But that tint order's sitting there, and if I don't grab it Tuesday I'm looking at a family switch later in the week *anyway*, eating three hours I might not have. \n\nSo I'm thinking: do I take the washdown hit now — white to tint, the expensive direction — bet that Line 2 can recover the time on the tint because it's decent volume, then come back to whites Thursday? Or do I play it safe, stay in whites, and just accept I'm paying that washdown Friday no matter what?\n\n*taps desk*\n\nWhat I *couldn't* tell you: if Line 2 sits idle Wednesday morning waiting for the tint resin delivery — which it did, by the way, truck was four hours late — does that idle time wipe out whatever I saved by not doing two washdowns? And if the filler jams Thursday, which line has enough buffer to cover Meridian's due date?\n\nI went with the washdown Tuesday. We hit the dates, barely. But I have *no idea* if that was actually the smart call or if I just got lucky with how things broke. That's the kind of thing I'd love to be able to test before I commit the line." + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "That's a clear picture of the pressure. So you need to see whether the timing works out under different disruption scenarios — late trucks, jams — and whether committing the line one way leaves you exposed if something breaks.\n\nLet me follow that Tuesday decision to understand how the production actually works. \n\nWhen Line 2 is running that Meridian white — VW-01 — walk me through what's actually happening from the time you commit the line to that job until it's done and the line is ready for the next thing. What has to be in place before it can start, what's the line doing during the run, and what determines when it's finished?" + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "*shifts forward*\n\nAlright. So before Line 2 can even touch VW-01, I need the resin tanks topped off — base resin for whites comes from the bulk storage, that's usually fine, they keep it flowing. And the previous run has to be done and cleared out, obviously. If the previous product was another white, we're talking a quick rinse, half an hour maybe. If we're coming off a tint, that's the full three-hour washdown I mentioned — gotta get every trace of pigment out or the batch is trash.\n\nOnce the line's clean and ready, they start the mix stage — that's batching the base resin with additives in the mix tank. Takes maybe thirty, forty minutes to get a batch mixed and pumped to the mill. \n\nThen it goes through the mill — that's where we grind it down to spec, get the particle size right. For a white like VW-01, the mill's not the slow part, it keeps up fine. From there it flows into the little holding tank before tint and letdown — we add any final tint, adjust viscosity, that sort of thing. That stage is quick for whites.\n\nThen it's into fill and pack. *That's* the bottleneck on VW-01 — big volume white, the filler is just running flat out, cans coming off the line. Line 2's fast, maybe twice what Line 1 can do on whites, but it's still hours of just filling.\n\n*leans back*\n\nWhen's it done? When we've filled the order quantity, QA pulls samples from the last few cans, and the batch goes into QA hold. They need about four hours to sign off on it — sometimes longer if it's end of week and the lab's backed up. Once QA clears it, it can ship, and the line's ready for the next job... once we do whatever changeover that next job needs." + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "Okay, so the line is working through a sequence — changeover first if needed, then mix, mill, tint/letdown, fill, and finally QA hold before it can ship. The fill stage is where VW-01 spends most of its time because it's high volume.\n\nYou mentioned the resin delivery being four hours late on Wednesday when you ran the tint order. Walk me through what happens when Line 2 is scheduled to start a job but the resin truck hasn't arrived yet. \n\nWhat can the line do while it's waiting? Can it finish a previous job, or start mixing something else, or is it just sitting there until that specific resin shows up?" + } + ], + "violations": [ + { + "code": "missing-workpiece", + "detail": "No recoverable runbook-ir workpiece was emitted." + } + ], + "wroteCaptureStore": false, + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "794fe2fbf1eaeba3fc816c6e3d1755d7b444125d", + "instrumentStatus": "", + "fileSha256": { + "yarn.lock": "3f445d255ef7893c1941f5610e2a813a903d5b9053c9831012c3d7c3875571dc", + "apps/brunch-agent/package.json": "27182018edf5c595522815ea28d78e549d387c127714c0ea2c54a84822ead742", + "apps/brunch-agent/vite.config.ts": "f1a50233829599dff2d5ef7ee0cd10bdb55d7fe65a52a6e85913e00a33a5300d", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/app.ts": "979efb9172c82df7499b218125735929a9586a0d9355e042e9ff2402955f385e", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/db.ts": "9f3a2598df3ce6737de1348afa8baf7deeeeac51b8202bf87adb76dc96374481", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "e87ebbd611dd87f897c0ab15c704e6604bc032f99a96ee1a3bb827c03344300e", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/ping.ts": "a6f50f65f1bb4f1b62a2bf5fa23b343b973dd007be720a33dfbf5cd4a0595744", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/identity.ts": "b52f764ba6e6bb50602d477eb93234aa6a900c843412551de40ea6ad3050e5e6", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/transcript.ts": "b96cf8d2b8352d414f674985b7071c9570323ccaf862f7e77ec76311e4b11d44", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/http/routes.ts": "7d8389931c57671ad8376d0a0ab497413013d47b012ffbf531339d0d1ce3a0cd", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/artifacts.ts": "15951ab3705b126d64a2593731b50775a16915298dae87b8cf7c99e265e2c2f4", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/campaign-integrity.ts": "60215179f5d48bacbf4da7b0876d049ed8b15b4b774d99eab092a1297502a3b4", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/load-built-application.ts": "c4b28985ad98dd1dde5afb8838ba6f9445692d208adde05c22f30f6074365056", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v3-run.ts": "a0a197af22d0a007f73836db49cd13a2c776e57d0dab047e537868c9ff2f33f9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/package.json": "e12d9cc79d38c43e5543a5667753e5049dfbf21bec425c25942f1c4cbb922a1f", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "82b035268c07cc8ee4736b5ffdd392c8f153793d2ca6b9ed57271c9b6146de10", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "0bd463eaab4eb68b86431bf26e0e01f90c89437b2888c86f4da53d7a0f39ec13", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/package.json": "dca0db144c530bcf66c5400c029efa5e1136c9d7f81ed174343e891985200c33", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md": "9915751f11baf06de31b237ee8df57b5217f2e7f0531090370a7e08d0282b6c2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "d5bac87a192b92fb6b7d749ec3d58116f9e39527b59e425c60aaeedf5cc13bd0", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts": "a283342146c8d2c2cb8056c588e76c1c3094f1e21e731be251c8fcdb335ed1b2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "ea3a8755a576e98d35fce6a1e1f928a61148eb713f0bc2c2f818d104eb5f3832", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "6c26ed3808ccbb7133ea7c370779e63885dfdc342c6594f5cb3730b467e2b1da", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "43dbc9adc9168ae9984321895fca441386ee3c44ab8691ba92baec0f7c43f400", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts": "7a4a03b62267531ba65b0f27128d804ad7fc70acf333266910010cc999f19d40", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts": "9e020d8bee5e6c9902b5e5b609abc5930d3e27647d0f4d0d4679f3e31097dfbb", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/opening-message.md": "84ec5faa5fd46699c008b3b2aad49eb9988b8c2ab039c8e147fdb077d562ef54", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/situation-pack.md": "4dbeb44a881c4675ec0ce7a5f068ea46ce1a4968a405b2dd692f92816d33e083", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/vestera-scheduling/truth-ledger-v1-prospective.yaml": "6be9753bcbeb31a4bcb839be1acd4de4a15b1754af25d2cdd0b75fe63dd3d860", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/ir-quality-ruler-v1.md": "817e43d15848bcec3c720a3e8b1104d31faf3035fd7ae8269d0a97ee43ef4a9a", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1/omniscient-grader.md": "a0ab12ceb3fc26d314b3f674ed6728a6bf5a6a24d2325ed32336020a605d96e5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1/cold-ir-reviewer.md": "ddd2620f17c5311a4a186b5bc229ae3f916d811e4aeb35f215ed7502c31fc8f5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v3/protocol.md": "faba12be8642400e60df37bc5bf5c321541f922d9f0433cf1455423492a2be7a", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md": "f57f4177edbe957092e86c19826a003b6c9257c319a129008428839e4cf0e2b7", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-50-28-709Z-20a4817f.ir.md": "3ee05f3d5d88f3061b360467e755606f7c43e07bdfacdfebb094bebaee23e732", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-50-28-709Z-20a4817f.omniscient.md": "82dbe47745b175cca93d50ea64a45715bfafd860d109904c1d5136282fae0aa0", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-50-28-709Z-20a4817f.cold.md": "c832a84226a4fb795281b96185b5efae13bdcf59a2db6c9cf481e5cd9b0b81b8", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-56-34-754Z-4b75737c.ir.md": "4d15050ac6a2a89e1f6a371a604522504bbb90c0893c2029773b1b906db85043", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-56-34-754Z-4b75737c.omniscient.md": "ee81f16127bf255a3247a3c9f42508970542beebf38a3445d9be18e0f765e120", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-56-34-754Z-4b75737c.cold.md": "d072d7fe27e6b8458ccb7d9119c7901fcc45d47d88141b970ce2d9ac2a0b2224" + }, + "builtArtifactManifest": [ + { + "path": "apps/brunch-agent/dist/app.mjs", + "sha256": "5ce74b2646c00b959b3ee847b47e006717ccc21e1fba769ce818566cba6da62e" + }, + { + "path": "apps/brunch-agent/dist/node-server-BWNSXBme.mjs", + "sha256": "90343929bc5274e0644003e8d7ea69b02003ac4d3b364a0afdb0be0e1032c066" + }, + { + "path": "apps/brunch-agent/dist/server.mjs", + "sha256": "c2d4ccb5aa999e33d33530ba87280e4bb6d6aacd41df630876297bfabea8f04e" + } + ], + "builtArtifactManifestSha256": "5bb67f5cbb1315e789426d83780ed9af23c58b1a04cf14a4b62a831cae435cd0" + }, + "failure": { + "name": "Error", + "message": "The simulated expert returned no text", + "stack": "Error: The simulated expert returned no text\n at askExpert (file:///Users/lunelson/.herdr/worktrees/hash/bravo/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v3-run.ts:525:13)\n at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:105:5)\n at async file:///Users/lunelson/.herdr/worktrees/hash/bravo/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v3-run.ts:597:25" + }, + "transcript": "## User\nI'm the master scheduler at a coatings plant. My boss wants a simulation model of how we\nschedule production, so we can test scheduling decisions before making them. We have tooling\nthat runs Petri-net-style process models, so the end product should be a model I can hand to\nthat — but I can't tell you much about the format, I'm not the modelling person.\n\nPlease interview me about how our operation works, and then produce the model.\n\n## Assistant\nGood, I'm here to help you build that model. Before we get into the details, let me understand what you're trying to test.\n\nWhen you say you want to test scheduling decisions before making them — what's a recent scheduling choice you've had to make where having a simulation model would have helped you? Walk me through what the decision was and what you were worried about getting wrong.\n- tool activate_skill (toolu_01Y9xvo8jtzwV9AfkjwS7i7c): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation, review, or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Before substantive\\nelicitation or workpiece revision, read\\n`references/universal-elicitation.md` and `references/profile.md`.\\n\\nFor review, first inspect the supplied workpiece or model. If it already answers\\nthe question, answer without reading the elicitation references or interviewing.\\nIf the review exposes a gap that requires human knowledge, read both elicitation\\nreferences and then ask exactly one focused question that resolves the smallest\\nconsequential gap.\\n\\nRead `templates/workpiece.md` only when first creating or materially revising\\nthe workpiece. Do not load the template merely to inspect an existing artifact,\\nanswer a resolvable review question, or frame the first elicitation question.\\nConstruct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in\\nthis conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview.\\nRead `references/pn-construction.md` and `references/checks.md`, then use the\\nmounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful\\nconstruction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive\\nelicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read\\n`references/pn-construction.md` and `references/checks.md` before beginning.\\nUse mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting\\ndefinition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are\\nabsent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `references/checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted.\\nDeliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the\\nmounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can\\nsupport, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target\\nor current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- references/checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/checks.md\\n- references/pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/pn-construction.md\\n- references/profile.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/profile.md\\n- references/universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/universal-elicitation.md\\n- templates/workpiece.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/templates/workpiece.md\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (toolu_01TievKiY9xYwH72K2c1AYV7): \"# Universal Elicitation Reference\\n\\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\\n\\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Work from purpose\\n\\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\\n\\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\\n\\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\\n\\n### Follow the person's account\\n\\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\\n\\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\\n\\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\\n\\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\\n\\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\\n\\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\\n\\n### Treat divergence as information\\n\\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\\n\\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\\n\\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\\n\\n### Stop honestly\\n\\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\\n\\n### Vague or compressed language\\n\\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\\n\\n### Normative language\\n\\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\\n\\n### Tension within or between accounts\\n\\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\\n\\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\\n\\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\\n\\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\\n\\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\\n\\n### Diminishing yield\\n\\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\\n\\n### Assent without independent wording\\n\\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\\n\\n### Silence and absence\\n\\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\\n\\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\\n\\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\\n\\n### Slice a concrete case\\n\\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\\n\\n### Sweep one property\\n\\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\\n\\n### Ask for the last occurrence\\n\\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\\n\\n### Ask for the basis\\n\\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\\n\\n### Ground a term or artifact\\n\\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\\n\\n### Clarify until observable\\n\\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\\n\\n### Use contrastive cases\\n\\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\\n\\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\\n\\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\\n\\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\\n\\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\\n\\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\\n\\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\\n\\n### Restate for correction\\n\\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\\n\\n### Propose structure for correction\\n\\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\\n\\n### Deposit and defer\\n\\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\\n\\n### Press without trapping\\n\\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\\n\\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\\n\\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\\n\\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\\n\\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\\n\\n### Trade concrete outcomes\\n\\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\\n\\n### Close with one correction opportunity\\n\\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\\n\\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\\n\\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\\n\\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\\n\\n### Before asking\\n\\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\\n\\n### Before recording\\n\\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\\n\\n### Before closing\\n\\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (toolu_01YY1ZTtVP9bW3LoEokqx28A): \"# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\\n\\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\\n\\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\\n\\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\\n\\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\\n\\n### Keep target structure backstage\\n\\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\\n\\n### Preserve operational context\\n\\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\\n\\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\\n\\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\\n\\n### Language and account signals\\n\\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\\n\\n### Operational situation patterns\\n\\n#### Timed work\\n\\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\\n\\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\\n\\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\\n\\n#### Contended resource\\n\\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\\n\\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\\n\\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\\n\\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\\n\\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\\n\\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\\n\\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\\n\\n#### Mode change\\n\\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\\n\\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\\n\\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\\n\\n#### Spatial transfer\\n\\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\\n\\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\\n\\n#### Policy under pressure\\n\\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\\n\\n#### Hidden waiting\\n\\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\\n\\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\\n\\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\\n\\n### Link the slice to the objective\\n\\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\\n\\n### Expose the process spine\\n\\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\\n\\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\\n\\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\\n\\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\\n\\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\\n\\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\\n\\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\\n\\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\\n\\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\\n\\n### Close a resource account\\n\\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\\n\\n### Close a mode change in both directions\\n\\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\\n\\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\\n\\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\\n\\n### Ask what is conserved\\n\\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\\n\\n### Establish retry scope\\n\\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\\n\\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\\n\\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\\n\\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\\n\\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\\n\\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\\n\\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\\n\\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\\n\\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\\n\\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\\n\\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\\n\\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\\n\\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\\n\\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\\n\\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\\n\\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\\n\\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\\n\\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\\n\\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\\n\\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\\n\\n### Purpose and process\\n\\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\\n\\n### Operational semantics\\n\\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\\n\\n### Quantities and context\\n\\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\\n\"\n\n## User\n*leans back slightly*\n\nOkay, good example — this was maybe three weeks back. Tuesday morning, I'm staring at the sheet and Line 2's got about six hours left on a big Meridian white run, VW-01. Next up I've got two orders: another white for a distributor, due Thursday, or I could switch families and knock out a medium tint order that's due Friday.\n\nThe white's the safe play — quick rinse, maybe twenty minutes, keep cranking. But that tint order's sitting there, and if I don't grab it Tuesday I'm looking at a family switch later in the week *anyway*, eating three hours I might not have. \n\nSo I'm thinking: do I take the washdown hit now — white to tint, the expensive direction — bet that Line 2 can recover the time on the tint because it's decent volume, then come back to whites Thursday? Or do I play it safe, stay in whites, and just accept I'm paying that washdown Friday no matter what?\n\n*taps desk*\n\nWhat I *couldn't* tell you: if Line 2 sits idle Wednesday morning waiting for the tint resin delivery — which it did, by the way, truck was four hours late — does that idle time wipe out whatever I saved by not doing two washdowns? And if the filler jams Thursday, which line has enough buffer to cover Meridian's due date?\n\nI went with the washdown Tuesday. We hit the dates, barely. But I have *no idea* if that was actually the smart call or if I just got lucky with how things broke. That's the kind of thing I'd love to be able to test before I commit the line.\n\n## Assistant\nThat's a clear picture of the pressure. So you need to see whether the timing works out under different disruption scenarios — late trucks, jams — and whether committing the line one way leaves you exposed if something breaks.\n\nLet me follow that Tuesday decision to understand how the production actually works. \n\nWhen Line 2 is running that Meridian white — VW-01 — walk me through what's actually happening from the time you commit the line to that job until it's done and the line is ready for the next thing. What has to be in place before it can start, what's the line doing during the run, and what determines when it's finished?\n\n## User\n*shifts forward*\n\nAlright. So before Line 2 can even touch VW-01, I need the resin tanks topped off — base resin for whites comes from the bulk storage, that's usually fine, they keep it flowing. And the previous run has to be done and cleared out, obviously. If the previous product was another white, we're talking a quick rinse, half an hour maybe. If we're coming off a tint, that's the full three-hour washdown I mentioned — gotta get every trace of pigment out or the batch is trash.\n\nOnce the line's clean and ready, they start the mix stage — that's batching the base resin with additives in the mix tank. Takes maybe thirty, forty minutes to get a batch mixed and pumped to the mill. \n\nThen it goes through the mill — that's where we grind it down to spec, get the particle size right. For a white like VW-01, the mill's not the slow part, it keeps up fine. From there it flows into the little holding tank before tint and letdown — we add any final tint, adjust viscosity, that sort of thing. That stage is quick for whites.\n\nThen it's into fill and pack. *That's* the bottleneck on VW-01 — big volume white, the filler is just running flat out, cans coming off the line. Line 2's fast, maybe twice what Line 1 can do on whites, but it's still hours of just filling.\n\n*leans back*\n\nWhen's it done? When we've filled the order quantity, QA pulls samples from the last few cans, and the batch goes into QA hold. They need about four hours to sign off on it — sometimes longer if it's end of week and the lab's backed up. Once QA clears it, it can ship, and the line's ready for the next job... once we do whatever changeover that next job needs.\n\n## Assistant\nOkay, so the line is working through a sequence — changeover first if needed, then mix, mill, tint/letdown, fill, and finally QA hold before it can ship. The fill stage is where VW-01 spends most of its time because it's high volume.\n\nYou mentioned the resin delivery being four hours late on Wednesday when you ran the tint order. Walk me through what happens when Line 2 is scheduled to start a job but the resin truck hasn't arrived yet. \n\nWhat can the line do while it's waiting? Can it finish a previous job, or start mixing something else, or is it just sitting there until that specific resin shows up?", + "rawConversationSnapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1GZ675M0KP0D7DNFKMPAS08", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000082", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFHWjY3NUo1R1NTRkdOWTRDSzdHWlZC", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GZ675J5GSSFGNY4CK7GZVB", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'm the master scheduler at a coatings plant. My boss wants a simulation model of how we\nschedule production, so we can test scheduling decisions before making them. We have tooling\nthat runs Petri-net-style process models, so the end product should be a model I can hand to\nthat — but I can't tell you much about the format, I'm not the modelling person.\n\nPlease interview me about how our operation works, and then produce the model.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1GZ68D0PJSK3X7X05F2YSHC", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GZ675J5GSSFGNY4CK7GZVB", + "turnId": "turn_01M1GZ676DRH9MG4W070JCJTRT", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The user is a master scheduler at a coatings plant. They want:\n1. A simulation model of their production scheduling process\n2. It needs to be a Petri net-style model (their tooling uses that)\n3. They want to test scheduling decisions before implementation\n4. They're not the modeling person, so they won't know technical details about the format\n\nThis is clearly an operational process modeling task. I need to:\n1. Activate the sdcpn-modelling skill first\n2. Conduct an elicitation interview focusing on their scheduling process\n3. Build a workpiece that captures their operational process\n4. Eventually construct a Petri net model if the tools are available\n\nLet me activate the skill first, then begin the interview. I should start by understanding the purpose and scope - what decisions they need to test, what matters most in their scheduling process.\n\nI should use their vocabulary (scheduling, production, coatings) not Petri net terminology during the interview.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01Y9xvo8jtzwV9AfkjwS7i7c", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation, review, or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Before substantive\nelicitation or workpiece revision, read\n`references/universal-elicitation.md` and `references/profile.md`.\n\nFor review, first inspect the supplied workpiece or model. If it already answers\nthe question, answer without reading the elicitation references or interviewing.\nIf the review exposes a gap that requires human knowledge, read both elicitation\nreferences and then ask exactly one focused question that resolves the smallest\nconsequential gap.\n\nRead `templates/workpiece.md` only when first creating or materially revising\nthe workpiece. Do not load the template merely to inspect an existing artifact,\nanswer a resolvable review question, or frame the first elicitation question.\nConstruct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in\nthis conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview.\nRead `references/pn-construction.md` and `references/checks.md`, then use the\nmounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful\nconstruction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive\nelicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read\n`references/pn-construction.md` and `references/checks.md` before beginning.\nUse mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting\ndefinition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are\nabsent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `references/checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted.\nDeliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the\nmounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can\nsupport, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target\nor current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- references/checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/checks.md\n- references/pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/pn-construction.md\n- references/profile.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/profile.md\n- references/universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/universal-elicitation.md\n- templates/workpiece.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/templates/workpiece.md\n", + "durationMs": 3 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good, I've activated the skill. Now I need to read the universal-elicitation and profile references before beginning the interview. The skill instructions say \"Before substantive elicitation or workpiece revision, read `references/universal-elicitation.md` and `references/profile.md`.\"\n\nLet me read these two references.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01TievKiY9xYwH72K2c1AYV7", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/universal-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01YY1ZTtVP9bW3LoEokqx28A", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/profile.md" + }, + "output": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n", + "durationMs": 1 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good. I've read both references. Now I'm ready to begin the interview. Let me orient and then start with one focused question. \n\nFrom the user's initial statement, I know:\n- They're a master scheduler at a coatings plant\n- The purpose is to test scheduling decisions before making them\n- The tooling will be Petri-net-based\n- They want a simulation model\n\nI should start by establishing enough purpose and context: what decisions they want to test, what kind of outcomes matter, and what boundary/horizon I should focus on. I should ask one focused opening question that gets at a concrete case of how their scheduling process works, not traverse a schema.\n\nLet me start with an orientation question that gets at both purpose and a concrete entry point into their scheduling operation.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good, I'm here to help you build that model. Before we get into the details, let me understand what you're trying to test.\n\nWhen you say you want to test scheduling decisions before making them — what's a recent scheduling choice you've had to make where having a simulation model would have helped you? Walk me through what the decision was and what you were worried about getting wrong.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFHWjdBNk42SzBFUTJDQ1Y0RkVBNDM4", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GZ7A6N6K0EQ2CCV4FEA438", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "*leans back slightly*\n\nOkay, good example — this was maybe three weeks back. Tuesday morning, I'm staring at the sheet and Line 2's got about six hours left on a big Meridian white run, VW-01. Next up I've got two orders: another white for a distributor, due Thursday, or I could switch families and knock out a medium tint order that's due Friday.\n\nThe white's the safe play — quick rinse, maybe twenty minutes, keep cranking. But that tint order's sitting there, and if I don't grab it Tuesday I'm looking at a family switch later in the week *anyway*, eating three hours I might not have. \n\nSo I'm thinking: do I take the washdown hit now — white to tint, the expensive direction — bet that Line 2 can recover the time on the tint because it's decent volume, then come back to whites Thursday? Or do I play it safe, stay in whites, and just accept I'm paying that washdown Friday no matter what?\n\n*taps desk*\n\nWhat I *couldn't* tell you: if Line 2 sits idle Wednesday morning waiting for the tint resin delivery — which it did, by the way, truck was four hours late — does that idle time wipe out whatever I saved by not doing two washdowns? And if the filler jams Thursday, which line has enough buffer to cover Meridian's due date?\n\nI went with the washdown Tuesday. We hit the dates, barely. But I have *no idea* if that was actually the smart call or if I just got lucky with how things broke. That's the kind of thing I'd love to be able to test before I commit the line.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1GZ7BGMM4ASQ07BF7K5T2SB", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GZ7A6N6K0EQ2CCV4FEA438", + "turnId": "turn_01M1GZ7A6W65DQQMECT8XVGXQZ", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "This is excellent. The scheduler just gave me a rich concrete case with clear decision points, real consequences, and observable uncertainty. Let me extract what I learned and what I need to follow up on:\n\n**What I learned:**\n- Purpose: Test scheduling decisions before committing, especially around product family switches\n- Decision context: Whether to switch product families (white to tint) now vs. later\n- Key trade-off: Washdown time cost vs. scheduling flexibility and risk\n- Lines exist (at least Line 2)\n- Product families: at least \"white\" and \"tint\" \n- Specific products mentioned: Meridian white (VW-01), distributor white, medium tint\n- Family switches require washdowns, and direction matters (\"white to tint, the expensive direction\")\n- Washdown times: ~20 minutes for white-to-white rinse, 3 hours for white-to-tint\n- Due dates matter (Thursday, Friday)\n- Disruptions happen: resin delivery delays, filler jams\n- Lines can sit idle waiting for materials\n- There's some notion of buffer related to covering due dates\n\n**What's still unclear but important:**\n- What exactly is a \"family\"? (white vs tint was mentioned, but I need the full picture)\n- What makes white-to-tint more expensive than tint-to-white?\n- How many lines total?\n- What's the basic production flow? (activities, sequence)\n- What are all the resources involved?\n- What exactly happens during a washdown?\n- What determines line speed/throughput?\n- What are the material dependencies (resin mentioned)?\n\n**My approach:**\nFollow this case to expose the process spine. I should:\n1. Understand what a production run actually entails (activities, sequence)\n2. Understand the family-switching constraint and washdown mechanics\n3. Understand material flows and dependencies\n4. Understand what makes a \"good\" vs \"bad\" decision in his terms\n\nI should NOT jump to asking about places, transitions, durations in isolation. \n\nStay grounded in his own terms: lines, runs, families, washdowns, materials, due dates. A good opening move is tracing the process spine first—what actually happens on a line while a run is underway—then dig into the family-switch and washdown mechanics, since those sit at the heart of his decision.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "That's a clear picture of the pressure. So you need to see whether the timing works out under different disruption scenarios — late trucks, jams — and whether committing the line one way leaves you exposed if something breaks.\n\nLet me follow that Tuesday decision to understand how the production actually works. \n\nWhen Line 2 is running that Meridian white — VW-01 — walk me through what's actually happening from the time you commit the line to that job until it's done and the line is ready for the next thing. What has to be in place before it can start, what's the line doing during the run, and what determines when it's finished?", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFHWjhFQ0RKSk5XNURYUUtXNVQzWEVT", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GZ8ECDJJNW5DXQKW5T3XES", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "*shifts forward*\n\nAlright. So before Line 2 can even touch VW-01, I need the resin tanks topped off — base resin for whites comes from the bulk storage, that's usually fine, they keep it flowing. And the previous run has to be done and cleared out, obviously. If the previous product was another white, we're talking a quick rinse, half an hour maybe. If we're coming off a tint, that's the full three-hour washdown I mentioned — gotta get every trace of pigment out or the batch is trash.\n\nOnce the line's clean and ready, they start the mix stage — that's batching the base resin with additives in the mix tank. Takes maybe thirty, forty minutes to get a batch mixed and pumped to the mill. \n\nThen it goes through the mill — that's where we grind it down to spec, get the particle size right. For a white like VW-01, the mill's not the slow part, it keeps up fine. From there it flows into the little holding tank before tint and letdown — we add any final tint, adjust viscosity, that sort of thing. That stage is quick for whites.\n\nThen it's into fill and pack. *That's* the bottleneck on VW-01 — big volume white, the filler is just running flat out, cans coming off the line. Line 2's fast, maybe twice what Line 1 can do on whites, but it's still hours of just filling.\n\n*leans back*\n\nWhen's it done? When we've filled the order quantity, QA pulls samples from the last few cans, and the batch goes into QA hold. They need about four hours to sign off on it — sometimes longer if it's end of week and the lab's backed up. Once QA clears it, it can ship, and the line's ready for the next job... once we do whatever changeover that next job needs.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1GZ8GRWX8M2M5J1TT2BMV3F", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GZ8ECDJJNW5DXQKW5T3XES", + "turnId": "turn_01M1GZ8ECMJYYT1YVRSK39QPCR", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good concrete detail on the flow. Let me capture the key elements emerging:\n\n1. **Prerequisites before starting VW-01:**\n - Resin tanks topped off (base resin for whites from bulk storage)\n - Previous run done and cleared out\n - Changeover/washdown completed (depends on previous product family - white-to-white is quick rinse ~30 min, tint-to-white is full washdown ~3 hours)\n\n2. **The production sequence for VW-01:**\n - Mix stage: batching base resin with additives in mix tank, 30-40 minutes, pumped to mill\n - Mill: grinding to spec, particle size - keeps up fine for whites (not the bottleneck)\n - Holding tank → tint and letdown stage: final tint, viscosity adjust - quick for whites\n - Fill and pack: the bottleneck for big volume white VW-01, filler running flat out for hours\n - Line 2 is fast (~2x Line 1 on whites)\n\n3. **Completion:**\n - When order quantity filled\n - QA pulls samples from last few cans\n - Batch goes into QA hold (~4 hours to sign off, sometimes longer end of week)\n - Once QA clears → can ship\n - Line ready for next job after changeover\n\n4. **Key distinctions:**\n - White vs tint products (different washdown requirements)\n - Line 2 vs Line 1 (different speeds on whites - Line 2 ~2x Line 1)\n - Product family matters for changeover direction and cost\n - Bottleneck location varies (fill and pack for VW-01)\n\n**What I need to understand next:**\n- The resin delivery issue he mentioned (truck 4 hours late) - how does that block work?\n- The filler jam scenario he mentioned\n- What's actually driving those 6-hour and 3-hour numbers he cited\n- Whether product moves through as discrete batches or the line itself is what's occupied\n- How lines, tanks, and the QA lab compete for use across jobs\n\nI want to trace through the blocking/waiting behavior in this case, then pivot to the alternative tint order path.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Okay, so the line is working through a sequence — changeover first if needed, then mix, mill, tint/letdown, fill, and finally QA hold before it can ship. The fill stage is where VW-01 spends most of its time because it's high volume.\n\nYou mentioned the resin delivery being four hours late on Wednesday when you ran the tint order. Walk me through what happens when Line 2 is scheduled to start a job but the resin truck hasn't arrived yet. \n\nWhat can the line do while it's waiting? Can it finish a previous job, or start mixing something else, or is it just sitting there until that specific resin shows up?", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GZ675J5GSSFGNY4CK7GZVB", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1GZ675J5GSSFGNY4CK7GZVB" + }, + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GZ7A6N6K0EQ2CCV4FEA438", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1GZ7A6N6K0EQ2CCV4FEA438" + }, + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GZ8ECDJJNW5DXQKW5T3XES", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1GZ8ECDJJNW5DXQKW5T3XES" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1GZ675JA1DMW323TCQ00JXK" + }, + "rawConversationSnapshotSha256": "6e879674d4a50a4468ac7265e38dc0458e3c2252011aba29679e4b144d66302f" +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-3-2026-09-02T11-50-29-634Z-05f070e9.failure-b98107fe.json b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-3-2026-09-02T11-50-29-634Z-05f070e9.failure-b98107fe.json new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..9cb21be3bda --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/prospective-runbook-v3-replication-3-2026-09-02T11-50-29-634Z-05f070e9.failure-b98107fe.json @@ -0,0 +1,542 @@ +{ + "schemaVersion": 1, + "protocolId": "prospective-runbook-v3", + "outputNamespaceId": "vestera-architecture-candidate-v3", + "comparisonTarget": { + "protocolId": "prospective-runbook-v1", + "outputNamespaceId": "vestera-prospective-baseline-v1", + "memberRunIds": [ + "runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-50-28-709Z-20a4817f", + "runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-56-34-754Z-4b75737c" + ], + "qualityPopulation": "valid-workpieces", + "runtimeAccounting": "reported-separately" + }, + "campaignFingerprint": "e93d1fd6b23a38b12201dee967c1b65e58b7c3d5724f57f1bedeb9413d9b76e1", + "replication": 3, + "runId": "prospective-runbook-v3-replication-3-2026-09-02T11-50-29-634Z-05f070e9", + "status": "invalid", + "invalidReason": "runtime-failure", + "startedAt": "2026-09-02T11:50:29.634Z", + "failedAt": "2026-09-02T11:52:05.387Z", + "interviewerModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "expertModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "hardStop": 8, + "latencyStopMs": 180000, + "finalizationMessage": "[Evaluation stop instruction; not expert evidence] The interview turn budget is exhausted. Emit the full current Markdown runbook IR in one `runbook-ir` fenced block. Do not ask another question, construct the Petri net, or read construction resources. Preserve every unresolved unknown, not-yet-asked item, declined or deferred item, assumption, conflict, correction, contextual coexistence, omission, and loss.", + "modelCalls": [ + { + "durationMs": 9716, + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": null, + "observedModelSource": "unavailable", + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "providerStopReason": null, + "inputTokens": 10, + "outputTokens": 388, + "totalTokens": 2874, + "cost": 0.0065928 + }, + { + "durationMs": 6674, + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": null, + "observedModelSource": "unavailable", + "stopReason": "toolUse", + "providerStopReason": null, + "inputTokens": 12, + "outputTokens": 309, + "totalTokens": 4414, + "cost": 0.01147755 + }, + { + "durationMs": 10563, + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": null, + "observedModelSource": "unavailable", + "stopReason": "stop", + "providerStopReason": null, + "inputTokens": 14, + "outputTokens": 269, + "totalTokens": 11079, + "cost": 0.03044115 + }, + { + "durationMs": 9893, + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": null, + "observedModelSource": "unavailable", + "stopReason": "stop", + "providerStopReason": null, + "inputTokens": 10, + "outputTokens": 243, + "totalTokens": 10975, + "cost": 0.0353403 + }, + { + "durationMs": 2740, + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": null, + "observedModelSource": "unavailable", + "stopReason": "stop", + "providerStopReason": null, + "inputTokens": 10, + "outputTokens": 59, + "totalTokens": 10993, + "cost": 0.0048891 + }, + { + "durationMs": 19539, + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": null, + "observedModelSource": "unavailable", + "stopReason": "stop", + "providerStopReason": null, + "inputTokens": 10, + "outputTokens": 599, + "totalTokens": 11748, + "cost": 0.01309845 + }, + { + "durationMs": 2312, + "providerId": "anthropic", + "providerName": "anthropic", + "api": "anthropic-messages", + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": null, + "observedModelSource": "unavailable", + "stopReason": "stop", + "providerStopReason": null, + "inputTokens": 10, + "outputTokens": 43, + "totalTokens": 11457, + "cost": 0.00501045 + } + ], + "expertUsage": { + "calls": 5, + "inputTokens": 15979, + "outputTokens": 755, + "cacheReadTokens": 0, + "cacheWriteTokens": 0 + }, + "expertCalls": [ + { + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929", + "observedModelSource": "provider-response", + "stopReason": "refusal" + }, + { + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929", + "observedModelSource": "provider-response", + "stopReason": "refusal" + }, + { + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929", + "observedModelSource": "provider-response", + "stopReason": "end_turn" + }, + { + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929", + "observedModelSource": "provider-response", + "stopReason": "refusal" + }, + { + "requestedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5", + "observedModel": "claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929", + "observedModelSource": "provider-response", + "stopReason": "refusal" + } + ], + "expertMessages": [ + { + "role": "user", + "content": "I'll help you develop a model of your scheduling operation that can support those testing decisions. Let me activate the specialized guidance for this kind of work, then we'll talk through how your operation actually runs.\nGood. Before we dig into the details of how scheduling works at your plant, let me understand what you're trying to get out of this model.\n\nYou mentioned your boss wants to test scheduling decisions before making them. Can you give me an example of a scheduling decision you'd want to test? What would you be trying to find out or avoid?" + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "*(leaning back slightly, half-smile)*\n\nWell, the big one right now is this idle-time question. You know — if I've got Line 2 finishing a white run at, say, 10:00 in the morning, and the next white order isn't due until tomorrow but there's a tint job sitting right there in the book... do I take the three-hour washdown hit to switch into the tint, or do I just let the line sit and wait for the next white?\n\nI do it by gut now. If it's just an hour or two and the white's a big Meridian order, I'll hold the line. But nobody can tell me if that's actually the smart play or if I'm leaving money on the table. My boss sees \"Line 2 idle 6 hours\" on the shift report and wants to know why I didn't run *something*.\n\n*(taps the desk)*\n\nThe other one — and this happens maybe twice a month — is when a line goes down at six in the morning. Filler jams on Line 2, or the mill motor on Line 1 decides it's done for the day. I've got thirty seconds at the floor huddle to figure out what moves to Line 3, what can slide a" + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "*(nods, listening)*\n\n—what can slide a... ?\n\n*(Go ahead and finish that thought about what you're deciding when a line goes down at the morning huddle.)*" + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "*(gestures with one hand)*\n\n—what can slide a day or two without getting us screamed at, and what absolutely has to ship today no matter what. \n\nRight now I'm doing that in my head while twenty people are standing around waiting. I know Meridian can't slip. I know the small distributors usually can. But when Line 2's down and it's got four orders on it, I'm juggling: can Line 1 pick up that white run even though it's slower? Do I burn overtime to get Line 3 running a second shift? Which tint order can I push to tomorrow without Commercial losing their minds?\n\n*(slight shrug)*\n\nIt'd be nice to have run that scenario on" + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "*(waiting for you to finish)*\n\n—run that scenario on... ?" + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "*(slight laugh, a bit self-conscious)*\n\n...on *something* before I'm standing there at the huddle with everyone staring at me. \n\nI mean, right now it's all in here *(taps temple)*—eleven years of \"this usually works\" and \"that customer will kill us if we're late.\" But if I could plug in \"Line 2 down for four hours starting 06:00\" and see what the model says to do, or at least see what happens if I move the Meridian order versus leave it... that'd be worth something.\n\n*(leans forward slightly)*\n\nThat's what I'm hoping this gets us. Not replacing the sheet—I'm still gonna own the schedule—but giving me a way to test the moves before I make them. Especially the expensive ones, like whether sitting a line idle really saves us money versus always keeping it running." + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "Okay, that's clear. You want to test idle-versus-switch decisions and line-down replanning before you commit, especially when the consequences are expensive or customer-visible. The model needs to show you what happens under different moves so you can compare them.\n\nLet me walk through how one of these actually plays out. Think back to the last time you had that idle-time call—Line 2 or any line finishes one kind of work, and you have to decide whether to switch to something different or let it sit.\n\nWhat was the line, what had it just finished, and what were you looking at as the options?" + }, + { + "role": "assistant", + "content": "*(thinks for a moment)*\n\nOkay, yeah—this was maybe two weeks ago. Line 2 had just wrapped a big white run, VW-01, the contractor flat. Finished around mid-morning, like 10:30. \n\nNext white order in the book was another VW-01, but that wasn't due until Thursday—this was Tuesday. So I had a day and a half of gap. But sitting right there I had a couple tint orders that were due Wednesday, decent-sized runs, and Line 2 could handle them.\n\n*(l" + }, + { + "role": "user", + "content": "*(listening, waiting for you to continue)*\n\n—and Line 2 could handle them... ?" + } + ], + "violations": [ + { + "code": "missing-workpiece", + "detail": "No recoverable runbook-ir workpiece was emitted." + } + ], + "wroteCaptureStore": false, + "instrument": { + "sourceCommit": "794fe2fbf1eaeba3fc816c6e3d1755d7b444125d", + "instrumentStatus": "", + "fileSha256": { + "yarn.lock": "3f445d255ef7893c1941f5610e2a813a903d5b9053c9831012c3d7c3875571dc", + "apps/brunch-agent/package.json": "27182018edf5c595522815ea28d78e549d387c127714c0ea2c54a84822ead742", + "apps/brunch-agent/vite.config.ts": "f1a50233829599dff2d5ef7ee0cd10bdb55d7fe65a52a6e85913e00a33a5300d", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/app.ts": "979efb9172c82df7499b218125735929a9586a0d9355e042e9ff2402955f385e", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/db.ts": "9f3a2598df3ce6737de1348afa8baf7deeeeac51b8202bf87adb76dc96374481", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts": "e87ebbd611dd87f897c0ab15c704e6604bc032f99a96ee1a3bb827c03344300e", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/ping.ts": "a6f50f65f1bb4f1b62a2bf5fa23b343b973dd007be720a33dfbf5cd4a0595744", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/identity.ts": "b52f764ba6e6bb50602d477eb93234aa6a900c843412551de40ea6ad3050e5e6", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/transcript.ts": "b96cf8d2b8352d414f674985b7071c9570323ccaf862f7e77ec76311e4b11d44", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/http/routes.ts": "7d8389931c57671ad8376d0a0ab497413013d47b012ffbf531339d0d1ce3a0cd", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/artifacts.ts": "15951ab3705b126d64a2593731b50775a16915298dae87b8cf7c99e265e2c2f4", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/campaign-integrity.ts": "60215179f5d48bacbf4da7b0876d049ed8b15b4b774d99eab092a1297502a3b4", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/load-built-application.ts": "c4b28985ad98dd1dde5afb8838ba6f9445692d208adde05c22f30f6074365056", + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v3-run.ts": "a0a197af22d0a007f73836db49cd13a2c776e57d0dab047e537868c9ff2f33f9", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/package.json": "e12d9cc79d38c43e5543a5667753e5049dfbf21bec425c25942f1c4cbb922a1f", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md": "82b035268c07cc8ee4736b5ffdd392c8f153793d2ca6b9ed57271c9b6146de10", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts": "0bd463eaab4eb68b86431bf26e0e01f90c89437b2888c86f4da53d7a0f39ec13", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/universal-elicitation.md": "a4aedd68317bcde4b98490ea73efa4ee7881e2fe3cbcf3363e3db26e29180716", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/package.json": "dca0db144c530bcf66c5400c029efa5e1136c9d7f81ed174343e891985200c33", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md": "9915751f11baf06de31b237ee8df57b5217f2e7f0531090370a7e08d0282b6c2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts": "d5bac87a192b92fb6b7d749ec3d58116f9e39527b59e425c60aaeedf5cc13bd0", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts": "a283342146c8d2c2cb8056c588e76c1c3094f1e21e731be251c8fcdb335ed1b2", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md": "ea3a8755a576e98d35fce6a1e1f928a61148eb713f0bc2c2f818d104eb5f3832", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md": "11e5547ea055bb390d7ff96f3469a39a36c84a4ed8a182153965e6d841b5e4bf", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md": "6c26ed3808ccbb7133ea7c370779e63885dfdc342c6594f5cb3730b467e2b1da", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md": "57edbdfebd733ed6c1d5eb02f81dc13e6d5b9c7357f00018c1d0f2b1b1a3f694", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md": "43dbc9adc9168ae9984321895fca441386ee3c44ab8691ba92baec0f7c43f400", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts": "7a4a03b62267531ba65b0f27128d804ad7fc70acf333266910010cc999f19d40", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts": "9e020d8bee5e6c9902b5e5b609abc5930d3e27647d0f4d0d4679f3e31097dfbb", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/opening-message.md": "84ec5faa5fd46699c008b3b2aad49eb9988b8c2ab039c8e147fdb077d562ef54", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/situation-pack.md": "4dbeb44a881c4675ec0ce7a5f068ea46ce1a4968a405b2dd692f92816d33e083", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/vestera-scheduling/truth-ledger-v1-prospective.yaml": "6be9753bcbeb31a4bcb839be1acd4de4a15b1754af25d2cdd0b75fe63dd3d860", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/ir-quality-ruler-v1.md": "817e43d15848bcec3c720a3e8b1104d31faf3035fd7ae8269d0a97ee43ef4a9a", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1/omniscient-grader.md": "a0ab12ceb3fc26d314b3f674ed6728a6bf5a6a24d2325ed32336020a605d96e5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1/cold-ir-reviewer.md": "ddd2620f17c5311a4a186b5bc229ae3f916d811e4aeb35f215ed7502c31fc8f5", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v3/protocol.md": "faba12be8642400e60df37bc5bf5c321541f922d9f0433cf1455423492a2be7a", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md": "f57f4177edbe957092e86c19826a003b6c9257c319a129008428839e4cf0e2b7", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-50-28-709Z-20a4817f.ir.md": "3ee05f3d5d88f3061b360467e755606f7c43e07bdfacdfebb094bebaee23e732", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-50-28-709Z-20a4817f.omniscient.md": "82dbe47745b175cca93d50ea64a45715bfafd860d109904c1d5136282fae0aa0", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-50-28-709Z-20a4817f.cold.md": "c832a84226a4fb795281b96185b5efae13bdcf59a2db6c9cf481e5cd9b0b81b8", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-56-34-754Z-4b75737c.ir.md": "4d15050ac6a2a89e1f6a371a604522504bbb90c0893c2029773b1b906db85043", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-56-34-754Z-4b75737c.omniscient.md": "ee81f16127bf255a3247a3c9f42508970542beebf38a3445d9be18e0f765e120", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-56-34-754Z-4b75737c.cold.md": "d072d7fe27e6b8458ccb7d9119c7901fcc45d47d88141b970ce2d9ac2a0b2224" + }, + "builtArtifactManifest": [ + { + "path": "apps/brunch-agent/dist/app.mjs", + "sha256": "5ce74b2646c00b959b3ee847b47e006717ccc21e1fba769ce818566cba6da62e" + }, + { + "path": "apps/brunch-agent/dist/node-server-BWNSXBme.mjs", + "sha256": "90343929bc5274e0644003e8d7ea69b02003ac4d3b364a0afdb0be0e1032c066" + }, + { + "path": "apps/brunch-agent/dist/server.mjs", + "sha256": "c2d4ccb5aa999e33d33530ba87280e4bb6d6aacd41df630876297bfabea8f04e" + } + ], + "builtArtifactManifestSha256": "5bb67f5cbb1315e789426d83780ed9af23c58b1a04cf14a4b62a831cae435cd0" + }, + "failure": { + "name": "Error", + "message": "The simulated expert returned no text", + "stack": "Error: The simulated expert returned no text\n at askExpert (file:///Users/lunelson/.herdr/worktrees/hash/bravo/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v3-run.ts:525:13)\n at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:105:5)\n at async file:///Users/lunelson/.herdr/worktrees/hash/bravo/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v3-run.ts:597:25" + }, + "transcript": "## User\nI'm the master scheduler at a coatings plant. My boss wants a simulation model of how we\nschedule production, so we can test scheduling decisions before making them. We have tooling\nthat runs Petri-net-style process models, so the end product should be a model I can hand to\nthat — but I can't tell you much about the format, I'm not the modelling person.\n\nPlease interview me about how our operation works, and then produce the model.\n\n## Assistant\nI'll help you develop a model of your scheduling operation that can support those testing decisions. Let me activate the specialized guidance for this kind of work, then we'll talk through how your operation actually runs.Good. Before we dig into the details of how scheduling works at your plant, let me understand what you're trying to get out of this model.\n\nYou mentioned your boss wants to test scheduling decisions before making them. Can you give me an example of a scheduling decision you'd want to test? What would you be trying to find out or avoid?\n- tool activate_skill (toolu_0134r7HowAbrVpNe6SU6XnvN): \"Run the skill named \\\"sdcpn-modelling\\\".\\n\\n\\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\\n\\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\\n\\n## Select the runtime branch\\n\\n### Interactive elicitation, review, or revision\\n\\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Before substantive\\nelicitation or workpiece revision, read\\n`references/universal-elicitation.md` and `references/profile.md`.\\n\\nFor review, first inspect the supplied workpiece or model. If it already answers\\nthe question, answer without reading the elicitation references or interviewing.\\nIf the review exposes a gap that requires human knowledge, read both elicitation\\nreferences and then ask exactly one focused question that resolves the smallest\\nconsequential gap.\\n\\nRead `templates/workpiece.md` only when first creating or materially revising\\nthe workpiece. Do not load the template merely to inspect an existing artifact,\\nanswer a resolvable review question, or frame the first elicitation question.\\nConstruct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in\\nthis conversation.\\n\\n### Construct-only execution\\n\\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview.\\nRead `references/pn-construction.md` and `references/checks.md`, then use the\\nmounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful\\nconstruction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive\\nelicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\\n\\n## Procedure\\n\\n### Orient\\n\\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\\n\\n### Elicit or revise\\n\\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\\n\\n### Maintain the workpiece\\n\\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\\n\\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\\n\\n### Construct\\n\\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read\\n`references/pn-construction.md` and `references/checks.md` before beginning.\\nUse mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting\\ndefinition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are\\nabsent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\\n\\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\\n\\n### Check and deliver\\n\\nApply `references/checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted.\\nDeliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the\\nmounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can\\nsupport, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target\\nor current tools could not represent.\\n\\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\\n\\n## Resource discipline\\n\\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\\n\\n\\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\\n\\n- references/checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/checks.md\\n- references/pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/pn-construction.md\\n- references/profile.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/profile.md\\n- references/universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/universal-elicitation.md\\n- templates/workpiece.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/templates/workpiece.md\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (toolu_01Qk8dUQEhHobkbtiSWKapLU): \"# Universal Elicitation Reference\\n\\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\\n\\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Work from purpose\\n\\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\\n\\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\\n\\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\\n\\n### Follow the person's account\\n\\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\\n\\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\\n\\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\\n\\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\\n\\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\\n\\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\\n\\n### Treat divergence as information\\n\\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\\n\\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\\n\\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\\n\\n### Stop honestly\\n\\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\\n\\n### Vague or compressed language\\n\\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\\n\\n### Normative language\\n\\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\\n\\n### Tension within or between accounts\\n\\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\\n\\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\\n\\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\\n\\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\\n\\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\\n\\n### Diminishing yield\\n\\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\\n\\n### Assent without independent wording\\n\\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\\n\\n### Silence and absence\\n\\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\\n\\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\\n\\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\\n\\n### Slice a concrete case\\n\\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\\n\\n### Sweep one property\\n\\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\\n\\n### Ask for the last occurrence\\n\\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\\n\\n### Ask for the basis\\n\\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\\n\\n### Ground a term or artifact\\n\\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\\n\\n### Clarify until observable\\n\\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\\n\\n### Use contrastive cases\\n\\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\\n\\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\\n\\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\\n\\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\\n\\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\\n\\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\\n\\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\\n\\n### Restate for correction\\n\\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\\n\\n### Propose structure for correction\\n\\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\\n\\n### Deposit and defer\\n\\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\\n\\n### Press without trapping\\n\\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\\n\\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\\n\\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\\n\\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\\n\\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\\n\\n### Trade concrete outcomes\\n\\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\\n\\n### Close with one correction opportunity\\n\\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\\n\\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\\n\\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\\n\\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\\n\\n### Before asking\\n\\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\\n\\n### Before recording\\n\\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\\n\\n### Before closing\\n\\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\\n\"\n- tool read_skill_resource (toolu_0154FnM7YUaQ8aZEccuVBLHm): \"# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\\n\\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\\n\\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\\n\\n## Directives\\n\\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\\n\\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\\n\\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\\n\\n### Keep target structure backstage\\n\\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\\n\\n### Preserve operational context\\n\\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\\n\\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\\n\\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\\n\\n## Recognition\\n\\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\\n\\n### Language and account signals\\n\\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\\n\\n### Operational situation patterns\\n\\n#### Timed work\\n\\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\\n\\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\\n\\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\\n\\n#### Contended resource\\n\\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\\n\\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\\n\\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\\n\\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\\n\\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\\n\\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\\n\\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\\n\\n#### Mode change\\n\\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\\n\\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\\n\\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\\n\\n#### Spatial transfer\\n\\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\\n\\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\\n\\n#### Policy under pressure\\n\\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\\n\\n#### Hidden waiting\\n\\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\\n\\n## Operations\\n\\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\\n\\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\\n\\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\\n\\n### Link the slice to the objective\\n\\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\\n\\n### Expose the process spine\\n\\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\\n\\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\\n\\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\\n\\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\\n\\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\\n\\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\\n\\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\\n\\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\\n\\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\\n\\n### Close a resource account\\n\\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\\n\\n### Close a mode change in both directions\\n\\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\\n\\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\\n\\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\\n\\n### Ask what is conserved\\n\\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\\n\\n### Establish retry scope\\n\\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\\n\\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\\n\\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\\n\\n## Coverage\\n\\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\\n\\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\\n\\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\\n\\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\\n\\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\\n\\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\\n\\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\\n\\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\\n\\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\\n\\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\\n\\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\\n\\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\\n\\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\\n\\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\\n\\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\\n\\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\\n\\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\\n\\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\\n\\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\\n\\n## Verification\\n\\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\\n\\n### Purpose and process\\n\\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\\n\\n### Operational semantics\\n\\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\\n\\n### Quantities and context\\n\\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\\n\\n### Failure signals and repairs\\n\\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\\n\"\n\n## User\n*(leaning back slightly, half-smile)*\n\nWell, the big one right now is this idle-time question. You know — if I've got Line 2 finishing a white run at, say, 10:00 in the morning, and the next white order isn't due until tomorrow but there's a tint job sitting right there in the book... do I take the three-hour washdown hit to switch into the tint, or do I just let the line sit and wait for the next white?\n\nI do it by gut now. If it's just an hour or two and the white's a big Meridian order, I'll hold the line. But nobody can tell me if that's actually the smart play or if I'm leaving money on the table. My boss sees \"Line 2 idle 6 hours\" on the shift report and wants to know why I didn't run *something*.\n\n*(taps the desk)*\n\nThe other one — and this happens maybe twice a month — is when a line goes down at six in the morning. Filler jams on Line 2, or the mill motor on Line 1 decides it's done for the day. I've got thirty seconds at the floor huddle to figure out what moves to Line 3, what can slide a\n\n## Assistant\n*(nods, listening)*\n\n—what can slide a... ?\n\n*(Go ahead and finish that thought about what you're deciding when a line goes down at the morning huddle.)*\n\n## User\n*(gestures with one hand)*\n\n—what can slide a day or two without getting us screamed at, and what absolutely has to ship today no matter what. \n\nRight now I'm doing that in my head while twenty people are standing around waiting. I know Meridian can't slip. I know the small distributors usually can. But when Line 2's down and it's got four orders on it, I'm juggling: can Line 1 pick up that white run even though it's slower? Do I burn overtime to get Line 3 running a second shift? Which tint order can I push to tomorrow without Commercial losing their minds?\n\n*(slight shrug)*\n\nIt'd be nice to have run that scenario on\n\n## Assistant\n*(waiting for you to finish)*\n\n—run that scenario on... ?\n\n## User\n*(slight laugh, a bit self-conscious)*\n\n...on *something* before I'm standing there at the huddle with everyone staring at me. \n\nI mean, right now it's all in here *(taps temple)*—eleven years of \"this usually works\" and \"that customer will kill us if we're late.\" But if I could plug in \"Line 2 down for four hours starting 06:00\" and see what the model says to do, or at least see what happens if I move the Meridian order versus leave it... that'd be worth something.\n\n*(leans forward slightly)*\n\nThat's what I'm hoping this gets us. Not replacing the sheet—I'm still gonna own the schedule—but giving me a way to test the moves before I make them. Especially the expensive ones, like whether sitting a line idle really saves us money versus always keeping it running.\n\n## Assistant\nOkay, that's clear. You want to test idle-versus-switch decisions and line-down replanning before you commit, especially when the consequences are expensive or customer-visible. The model needs to show you what happens under different moves so you can compare them.\n\nLet me walk through how one of these actually plays out. Think back to the last time you had that idle-time call—Line 2 or any line finishes one kind of work, and you have to decide whether to switch to something different or let it sit.\n\nWhat was the line, what had it just finished, and what were you looking at as the options?\n\n## User\n*(thinks for a moment)*\n\nOkay, yeah—this was maybe two weeks ago. Line 2 had just wrapped a big white run, VW-01, the contractor flat. Finished around mid-morning, like 10:30. \n\nNext white order in the book was another VW-01, but that wasn't due until Thursday—this was Tuesday. So I had a day and a half of gap. But sitting right there I had a couple tint orders that were due Wednesday, decent-sized runs, and Line 2 could handle them.\n\n*(l\n\n## Assistant\n*(listening, waiting for you to continue)*\n\n—and Line 2 could handle them... ?", + "rawConversationSnapshot": { + "v": 1, + "conversationId": "conv_01M1GZ9MJANJ8TFCDJWMWXJXV7", + "offset": "0000000000000000_0000000000000107", + "messages": [ + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFHWjlNSjhaSkFITUc5TlBLQlc1NlRI", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GZ9MJ8ZJAHMG9NPKBW56TH", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'm the master scheduler at a coatings plant. My boss wants a simulation model of how we\nschedule production, so we can test scheduling decisions before making them. We have tooling\nthat runs Petri-net-style process models, so the end product should be a model I can hand to\nthat — but I can't tell you much about the format, I'm not the modelling person.\n\nPlease interview me about how our operation works, and then produce the model.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1GZ9P8N3K4XZBTAXQ4Y3W9P", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GZ9MJ8ZJAHMG9NPKBW56TH", + "turnId": "turn_01M1GZ9MK4VSFTCNDN93EYWE78", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The user is a master scheduler at a coatings plant who needs a simulation model of their scheduling process. Their boss wants to test scheduling decisions, and they need a Petri net model compatible with their tooling. The user explicitly says they're not the modelling person and can't tell me much about the format.\n\nThis is exactly the kind of task the sdcpn-modelling skill is designed for. I need to:\n1. Activate the sdcpn-modelling skill to get specialized instructions\n2. Conduct an elicitation interview about their scheduling operation\n3. Build a recoverable workpiece as I learn\n4. Eventually construct an SDCPN if Petrinaut tools are available\n\nThe user is asking me to interview them, so I should begin the elicitation process. But first, I must activate the skill to get the detailed instructions for how to conduct this properly.\n\nKey points from the universal elicitation guidance:\n- Establish the purpose first - what decisions/questions must the model help with?\n- Use their vocabulary, not Petri net terminology during elicitation\n- Follow concrete cases rather than schema traversal\n- Don't invent content or increase precision silently\n- Keep source intent distinct from formalism transformation\n\nLet me activate the skill now.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "I'll help you develop a model of your scheduling operation that can support those testing decisions. Let me activate the specialized guidance for this kind of work, then we'll talk through how your operation actually runs.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "activate_skill", + "toolCallId": "toolu_0134r7HowAbrVpNe6SU6XnvN", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "name": "sdcpn-modelling" + }, + "output": "Run the skill named \"sdcpn-modelling\".\n\n\n# Capability-aware lifecycle\n\nUse one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred.\n\n## Select the runtime branch\n\n### Interactive elicitation, review, or revision\n\nInterview in the person's operational vocabulary. Before substantive\nelicitation or workpiece revision, read\n`references/universal-elicitation.md` and `references/profile.md`.\n\nFor review, first inspect the supplied workpiece or model. If it already answers\nthe question, answer without reading the elicitation references or interviewing.\nIf the review exposes a gap that requires human knowledge, read both elicitation\nreferences and then ask exactly one focused question that resolves the smallest\nconsequential gap.\n\nRead `templates/workpiece.md` only when first creating or materially revising\nthe workpiece. Do not load the template merely to inspect an existing artifact,\nanswer a resolvable review question, or frame the first elicitation question.\nConstruct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in\nthis conversation.\n\n### Construct-only execution\n\nUse the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview.\nRead `references/pn-construction.md` and `references/checks.md`, then use the\nmounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful\nconstruction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive\nelicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation.\n\n## Procedure\n\n### Orient\n\nEstablish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins.\n\n### Elicit or revise\n\nFor a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order.\n\n### Maintain the workpiece\n\nTreat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it.\n\nWhenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece.\n\n### Construct\n\nConstruct only from the current workpiece. Read\n`references/pn-construction.md` and `references/checks.md` before beginning.\nUse mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting\ndefinition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are\nabsent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes.\n\nConstruction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece.\n\n### Check and deliver\n\nApply `references/checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted.\nDeliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the\nmounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can\nsupport, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target\nor current tools could not represent.\n\nAn explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview.\n\n## Resource discipline\n\nRead resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions.\n\n\nSupporting skill resources are available but are not loaded into context unless needed:\n\n- references/checks.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/checks.md\n- references/pn-construction.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/pn-construction.md\n- references/profile.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/profile.md\n- references/universal-elicitation.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/universal-elicitation.md\n- templates/workpiece.md → read_skill_resource /.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/templates/workpiece.md\n", + "durationMs": 3 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good, the skill is activated. Now I'm in \"Interactive elicitation, review, or revision\" mode. According to the skill instructions, I should:\n\n1. Read `references/universal-elicitation.md` and `references/profile.md` before substantive elicitation\n2. Interview in the person's operational vocabulary\n3. Read `templates/workpiece.md` only when first creating or materially revising the workpiece\n4. Orient first - establish purpose and context\n\nLet me read those two reference files first to get the detailed elicitation guidance.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_01Qk8dUQEhHobkbtiSWKapLU", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/universal-elicitation.md" + }, + "output": "# Universal Elicitation Reference\n\nThis reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies.\n\nThe registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Work from purpose\n\nEstablish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it.\n\n### Accumulate posture conversationally\n\nLearn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form.\n\n### Follow the person's account\n\nUse the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account.\n\n### Protect interaction bandwidth\n\nDo not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time.\n\n### Preserve authorship and uncertainty\n\nKeep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not.\n\nPreserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result.\n\n### Treat divergence as information\n\nDo not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes.\n\n### Maintain a recoverable workpiece\n\nRecord useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached.\n\n### Stop honestly\n\nCompletion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question.\n\n### Vague or compressed language\n\nWords such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it.\n\n### Normative language\n\n“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists.\n\n### Tension within or between accounts\n\nAn answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood.\n\n### Unexplained terms and artifacts\n\nLocal terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading.\n\n### Burden, impatience, or limited availability\n\nThese are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly.\n\n### Diminishing yield\n\nSeveral turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question.\n\n### Assent without independent wording\n\nQuick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content.\n\n### Silence and absence\n\nMaterial may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds.\n\n## Operations\n\nChoose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule.\n\n### Select the smallest consequential absence\n\nCompare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it.\n\n### Slice a concrete case\n\nWalk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced.\n\n### Sweep one property\n\nAfter a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category.\n\n### Ask for the last occurrence\n\nWhen a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons.\n\n### Ask for the basis\n\nAsk how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement.\n\n### Ground a term or artifact\n\nAsk for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts.\n\n### Clarify until observable\n\nClarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe.\n\n### Use contrastive cases\n\nWhen ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies.\n\n### Investigate quantities relative to purpose\n\nBefore deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency.\n\n### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold\n\nWhen an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose.\n\n### State a contradiction without resolving it\n\nPut the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them.\n\n### Restate for correction\n\nOffer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept.\n\n### Propose structure for correction\n\nWhen low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it.\n\n### Deposit and defer\n\nWhen an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit.\n\n### Press without trapping\n\nWhen time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed.\n\n### Explore a rare or severe outcome\n\nUse a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment.\n\n### Seek a witness or counterexample\n\nAsk for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule.\n\n### Trade concrete outcomes\n\nWhen a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate.\n\n### Close with one correction opportunity\n\nBefore a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model.\n\nA workpiece may need to preserve:\n\n- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation;\n- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms;\n- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on;\n- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter;\n- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes;\n- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording;\n- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship;\n- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked;\n- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation;\n- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence;\n- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and\n- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning.\n\nCoverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible.\n\n## Verification\n\nVerification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence.\n\n### Before asking\n\n- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty.\n- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template.\n- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame.\n- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours.\n\n### Before recording\n\n- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default.\n- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule.\n- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence.\n- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account.\n\n### Before closing\n\n- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction.\n- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting.\n- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category.\n- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker.\n- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty.\n- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption.\n- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it.\n- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire.\n- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps.\n- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition.\n- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "dynamic-tool", + "toolName": "read_skill_resource", + "toolCallId": "toolu_0154FnM7YUaQ8aZEccuVBLHm", + "state": "output-available", + "input": { + "path": "/.flue/packaged-skills/skill%3Asdcpn-modelling%3A4236dc3c0e6a2446/references/profile.md" + }, + "output": "# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation\n\nThis reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance.\n\nThe registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary.\n\n## Directives\n\n### Build the operational account the purpose needs\n\nFor the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use.\n\nEvery objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure.\n\n### Keep target structure backstage\n\nAsk about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions.\n\n### Preserve operational context\n\nA value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter.\n\n### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses\n\nRecurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary.\n\n## Recognition\n\nRecognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread.\n\n### Language and account signals\n\n- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource.\n- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input.\n- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception.\n- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change.\n- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone.\n- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context.\n- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity.\n\n### Operational situation patterns\n\n#### Timed work\n\nAn activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability.\n\n#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome\n\nAn activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows.\n\n#### Contended resource\n\nSeveral activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return.\n\n#### Consumed, reserved, or read input\n\nAn activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities.\n\n#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite\n\nWork becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it.\n\n#### Continuous quantity and threshold\n\nA level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior.\n\n#### Mode change\n\nSetup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity.\n\n#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement\n\nWork moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group.\n\n#### Spatial transfer\n\nA change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary.\n\n#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nA disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome.\n\n#### Policy under pressure\n\nMore than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule.\n\n#### Hidden waiting\n\nA gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node.\n\n## Operations\n\nUse the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns.\n\n### Choose the case unit before slicing\n\nWhen several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff.\n\n### Link the slice to the objective\n\nAs the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail.\n\n### Expose the process spine\n\nAsk what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine.\n\n### Sweep operational concerns, not headings\n\nAfter a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality.\n\n### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs\n\nFor each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns.\n\n### Sweep what can befall an activity\n\nAcross the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery.\n\n### Test practiced policy with a borderline case\n\nWhen a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule.\n\n### Close a resource account\n\nFor a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability.\n\n### Close a mode change in both directions\n\nAsk whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does.\n\n### Turn waiting into a causal question\n\nAsk what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity.\n\n### Ask what is conserved\n\nWhen quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it.\n\n### Establish retry scope\n\nAsk whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset.\n\n### Establish validation from observable behavior\n\nAsk what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests.\n\n## Coverage\n\nCoverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories.\n\n### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds\n\nPreserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights.\n\n### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions\n\nPreserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential.\n\n### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources\n\nPreserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior.\n\n### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use\n\nFor each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation.\n\n### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery\n\nPreserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes.\n\n### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior\n\nPreserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports.\n\n### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes\n\nPreserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds.\n\n### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings\n\nPreserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable.\n\n### Things not independently elicited as target nodes\n\n- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure.\n- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time.\n- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape.\n- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place.\n\n## Verification\n\nApply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`.\n\n### Purpose and process\n\n- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms.\n- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported.\n- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff.\n\n### Operational semantics\n\n- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available.\n- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required.\n- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential.\n- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue.\n- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ.\n\n### Quantities and context\n\n- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it.\n- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named.\n- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value.\n\n### Failure signals and repairs\n\n- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it.\n- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question.\n- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage.\n- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation.\n- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context.\n- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies.\n- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences.\n", + "durationMs": 2 + }, + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good, I now have the detailed elicitation guidance. Key takeaways:\n\n1. Start with orientation - establish purpose, what decisions the model must support\n2. Use their vocabulary (not Petri net terms)\n3. Follow concrete cases\n4. One question or one coherent group at a time\n5. Build the workpiece as we go\n\nNow I should begin the interview. I need to orient first - understand:\n- What decisions or questions the model must help with\n- The boundary and horizon\n- What \"better\" means for testing scheduling decisions\n- Available time and tolerance for depth\n\nI'll start with a conversational opening question that gets at the purpose and a concrete case, not an intake form. The user already said \"test scheduling decisions before making them\" - that's the general purpose. I should deepen that a bit and then move to a concrete case.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Good. Before we dig into the details of how scheduling works at your plant, let me understand what you're trying to get out of this model.\n\nYou mentioned your boss wants to test scheduling decisions before making them. Can you give me an example of a scheduling decision you'd want to test? What would you be trying to find out or avoid?", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFHWkFTOEg3VFpXOFhHS1BZQlpIWDBa", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GZAS8H7TZW8XGKPYBZHX0Z", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "*(leaning back slightly, half-smile)*\n\nWell, the big one right now is this idle-time question. You know — if I've got Line 2 finishing a white run at, say, 10:00 in the morning, and the next white order isn't due until tomorrow but there's a tint job sitting right there in the book... do I take the three-hour washdown hit to switch into the tint, or do I just let the line sit and wait for the next white?\n\nI do it by gut now. If it's just an hour or two and the white's a big Meridian order, I'll hold the line. But nobody can tell me if that's actually the smart play or if I'm leaving money on the table. My boss sees \"Line 2 idle 6 hours\" on the shift report and wants to know why I didn't run *something*.\n\n*(taps the desk)*\n\nThe other one — and this happens maybe twice a month — is when a line goes down at six in the morning. Filler jams on Line 2, or the mill motor on Line 1 decides it's done for the day. I've got thirty seconds at the floor huddle to figure out what moves to Line 3, what can slide a", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1GZAVM7B433H55B39E4Y9MW", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GZAS8H7TZW8XGKPYBZHX0Z", + "turnId": "turn_01M1GZAS8R69G30S6E394SNK33", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The user is giving me excellent concrete detail about their scheduling operation. I should let them finish their thought about what happens when a line goes down - they were mid-sentence about \"what moves to Line 3, what can slide a...\" - they got cut off.\n\nI should acknowledge what they're saying and let them complete the thought, then continue building understanding around these two key decisions:\n1. The idle-time vs. washdown-switching decision\n2. The line-down emergency rescheduling decision\n\nThis is good purpose orientation - I'm learning what decisions the model needs to support. I should not jump into detailed process questions yet; I should stay at this level until I understand the objectives clearly, then move to a concrete case.\n\nI need to be careful not to load questions with Petri-net terminology. Stay in their vocabulary: lines, orders, runs, washdowns, tints vs whites, etc.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "*(nods, listening)*\n\n—what can slide a... ?\n\n*(Go ahead and finish that thought about what you're deciding when a line goes down at the morning huddle.)*", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFHWkJBMkM5UVIzM0UxOTNQNkEyTlEx", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GZBA2C9QR33E193P6A2NQ1", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "*(gestures with one hand)*\n\n—what can slide a day or two without getting us screamed at, and what absolutely has to ship today no matter what. \n\nRight now I'm doing that in my head while twenty people are standing around waiting. I know Meridian can't slip. I know the small distributors usually can. But when Line 2's down and it's got four orders on it, I'm juggling: can Line 1 pick up that white run even though it's slower? Do I burn overtime to get Line 3 running a second shift? Which tint order can I push to tomorrow without Commercial losing their minds?\n\n*(slight shrug)*\n\nIt'd be nice to have run that scenario on", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1GZBBM07GMYTYCE5EDX142Z", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GZBA2C9QR33E193P6A2NQ1", + "turnId": "turn_01M1GZBA2KGZ4HC3N545GW290Z", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The person is finishing their thought - they're saying it would be nice to have run that scenario beforehand. I should let them finish naturally rather than interrupting.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "*(waiting for you to finish)*\n\n—run that scenario on... ?", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFHWkJNWDE0RjQ0MVFTS1lFOUsxWTVa", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GZBMX14F441QSKYE9K1Y5Z", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "*(slight laugh, a bit self-conscious)*\n\n...on *something* before I'm standing there at the huddle with everyone staring at me. \n\nI mean, right now it's all in here *(taps temple)*—eleven years of \"this usually works\" and \"that customer will kill us if we're late.\" But if I could plug in \"Line 2 down for four hours starting 06:00\" and see what the model says to do, or at least see what happens if I move the Meridian order versus leave it... that'd be worth something.\n\n*(leans forward slightly)*\n\nThat's what I'm hoping this gets us. Not replacing the sheet—I'm still gonna own the schedule—but giving me a way to test the moves before I make them. Especially the expensive ones, like whether sitting a line idle really saves us money versus always keeping it running.", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1GZBP2EV4R1VV8TW4SH8XMM", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GZBMX14F441QSKYE9K1Y5Z", + "turnId": "turn_01M1GZBMX55BQCPQM67P7KDAGK", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "Good. This is clear. Let me capture what I've learned about purpose:\n\n1. **Primary decision: idle-time trade-off** — when a line finishes one product type (e.g., white) and the next scheduled job is the same type but hours/a day away, versus a different type (e.g., tint) available now but requiring washdown. The question is whether to switch and pay the washdown cost or let the line sit idle.\n\n2. **Secondary decision: line-down reallocation** — when a line fails (filler jam, motor failure), quickly deciding which orders move to other lines, which can slip without customer consequences, whether to add overtime/extra shifts.\n\n3. **Objectives/measures:**\n - Not explicitly quantified yet, but implicit: cost (washdown cost vs. idle cost), customer satisfaction/on-time delivery (some customers like Meridian can't slip, small distributors can), overtime cost\n - Boss sees idle time on shift reports and questions it\n - \"leaving money on the table\" suggests cost/revenue optimization\n\n4. **Audience:** The scheduler (this person), maybe the boss\n\n5. **Validation:** Being able to plug in scenarios like \"Line 2 down for four hours starting 06:00\" and compare moves\n\nNow I need to follow the concrete case. The idle-time question is the \"big one right now,\" so I'll start there. I should slice one concrete remembered case of this decision. The person gave me a partial example: Line 2 finishing white at 10:00 AM, next white not due until tomorrow, tint job available requiring 3-hour washdown.\n\nLet me ask about a real instance of this to understand:\n- What actually happened\n- What the line was running (the \"white run\")\n- What \"finishing\" means\n- What the next work was\n- How the decision was made\n- What the consequences were\n\nI should avoid target vocabulary (places, transitions, tokens) and stay in operational terms (lines, orders, runs, washdown, products, customers).", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "Okay, that's clear. You want to test idle-versus-switch decisions and line-down replanning before you commit, especially when the consequences are expensive or customer-visible. The model needs to show you what happens under different moves so you can compare them.\n\nLet me walk through how one of these actually plays out. Think back to the last time you had that idle-time call—Line 2 or any line finishes one kind of work, and you have to decide whether to switch to something different or let it sit.\n\nWhat was the line, what had it just finished, and what were you looking at as the options?", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_direct_c3ViXzAxTTFHWkNEWDNTREY3U0I5M1RKN0QxRVYw", + "role": "user", + "purpose": "user", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GZCDX3SDF7SB93TJ7D1EV0", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "text", + "text": "*(thinks for a moment)*\n\nOkay, yeah—this was maybe two weeks ago. Line 2 had just wrapped a big white run, VW-01, the contractor flat. Finished around mid-morning, like 10:30. \n\nNext white order in the book was another VW-01, but that wasn't due until Thursday—this was Tuesday. So I had a day and a half of gap. But sitting right there I had a couple tint orders that were due Wednesday, decent-sized runs, and Line 2 could handle them.\n\n*(l", + "state": "done" + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "entry_01M1GZCFBC7KQ8H8QGBXQR3B2R", + "role": "assistant", + "purpose": "assistant", + "display": "visible", + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GZCDX3SDF7SB93TJ7D1EV0", + "turnId": "turn_01M1GZCDX81NSDZS6WSKRRZZ1B", + "parts": [ + { + "type": "reasoning", + "text": "The user is mid-sentence, let them finish.", + "state": "done" + }, + { + "type": "text", + "text": "*(listening, waiting for you to continue)*\n\n—and Line 2 could handle them... ?", + "state": "done" + } + ] + } + ], + "settlements": [ + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GZ9MJ8ZJAHMG9NPKBW56TH", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1GZ9MJ8ZJAHMG9NPKBW56TH" + }, + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GZAS8H7TZW8XGKPYBZHX0Z", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1GZAS8H7TZW8XGKPYBZHX0Z" + }, + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GZBA2C9QR33E193P6A2NQ1", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1GZBA2C9QR33E193P6A2NQ1" + }, + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GZBMX14F441QSKYE9K1Y5Z", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1GZBMX14F441QSKYE9K1Y5Z" + }, + { + "submissionId": "sub_01M1GZCDX3SDF7SB93TJ7D1EV0", + "outcome": "completed", + "answeredBySubmissionId": "sub_01M1GZCDX3SDF7SB93TJ7D1EV0" + } + ], + "incarnation": "inc_01M1GZ9MJ8E3E1V119DSEJ021N" + }, + "rawConversationSnapshotSha256": "dc2d563751f4ef37bb344960b807dd08eef498414dc83d2c79d9c006e2442d56" +} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/implementations/mission-4-close.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/implementations/mission-4-close.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5fec1b51fad --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/implementations/mission-4-close.md @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ +# Mission 4 close record + +Closed: 2026-09-02 +Issue: [FE-1563](https://linear.app/hash/issue/FE-1563/redesign-the-elicitation-runbook-and-workpiece-against-the-frozen) + +## Accepted result + +Mission 4 promoted the owner-selected compact core prompt, SDCPN append, one `defineSkill`-assembled `sdcpn-modelling` skill, core-authored universal elicitation resource, SDCPN profile, Five-Register workpiece, construction guidance, and evidence-level checks into the production Flue `ChatAgent`. + +The owner accepted the architecture as baseline-competitive with explicit limitations. No claim of universal superiority, remote deployment, automatic projection, durable capture, or complete process acquisition is made. + +## Comparative evidence + +The v3 architecture campaign compared only with the latest two valid flat-prompt controls. + +- Candidate: omniscient `72.5 / 100`, cold `3.2 / 4`, conditional readiness, no hard-failure gate. +- Flat prompt: omniscient range `66.3–80.0`, cold range `3.3–3.5`, conditional readiness, no hard-failure gates. +- Candidate strengths: semantic conservation and gap/loss discipline. +- Candidate weaknesses: acquisition coverage, reader effort, one gradeable member out of three. +- Runtime failures: two simulated-expert/provider refusals, reported separately from quality. +- Cold review: two fresh contexts agreed on `3.2`, but both were provider-truncated with `stop_reason: refusal`. + +Evidence: + +- [`../evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/campaign-adjudication.md`](../evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/campaign-adjudication.md) +- [`../evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/mission-5-handoff.md`](../evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/mission-5-handoff.md) + +## Visible product witness + +The accepted local/restricted boundary crossed: + +```text +Petrinaut panel → same-origin /api/chat → AI SDK transport +→ production Flue ChatAgent → sdcpn-modelling skill → visible runbook-ir +``` + +The first launch exposed stale Petrinaut build output. A correct Vite 8.2.2 package rebuild restored the panel without source changes. The first conversation then exposed relative `read_skill_resource` labels failing against Flue's packaged-resource URI contract. The owner authorized a one-line exact-advertised-URI instruction repair. The rerun activated the skill, successfully read the advertised workpiece-template URI, asked one focused question, rendered an epistemically marked workpiece, and did not mount or call construction tools. + +The rerun still did not read universal/profile references before its initial substantive question. That accepted limitation remains explicit. + +Evidence: [`../evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/product-witness.md`](../evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/product-witness.md). + +## Mission 5 join + +The frozen handoff selects v3 replication 1 and binds: + +- exact raw Flue snapshot and readable transcript; +- selected workpiece and source-message hashes; +- exact source commit, campaign fingerprint, requested/observed models, and instrument manifest; +- omniscient and cold reports plus request metadata; +- comparative and human adjudication; +- visible-witness evidence and residual gaps. + +Mission 5 remains a draft. It must prepare and honestly label a non-empty prebuilt SDCPN and derivation fixture; none is implied by Mission 4. + +## Planning and deployment disposition + +- Mission 4 moved to `docs/mission-archive/`. +- No root `MISSION.md` remains and no successor implementation is authorized. +- `MISSION.next.md` and all four future drafts preserve the accepted M5–M9 spine. +- Content-free Flue OTel instrumentation remains in current application source. +- Mission 5 retains only latency/tool tracing needs; hosted OTLP, propagation, failure attributes, and remote telemetry remain Mission 8 release gates. +- No remote deployment or public release is claimed. + +## Verification + +Observed passing checks during close: + +- core, SDCPN plugin, and application production builds; +- application and package TypeScript checks; +- application and package Oxlint checks with only pre-existing warnings; +- repository format check before immutable campaign output was retained, plus a final scoped format check over every changed source/manifest file; +- full application unit suite: 18 files, 86 tests; +- focused SDCPN skill and production routing tests after the URI repair; +- clean post-commit hermetic v3 campaign proof before paid execution; +- real browser witness through the tracked Petrinaut panel. + +The repository's root Turborepo build could not invoke Petrinaut-core's workspace-local Vite binary because its executable link was absent. Direct execution of the installed pinned Vite 8.2.2 built Petrinaut-core and Petrinaut successfully; the website then built normally. + +The final pre-commit formatter normalized outer whitespace in the previously untracked raw v3 campaign JSON before its first commit. The emitted and canonical committed hashes, unchanged parsed content, and resulting outer-byte-integrity limitation are recorded in the adjudication and Mission 5 handoff. All changed source and manifest files pass the formatter; untracked `.playwright-cli` browser scratch remains outside the commit. + +## Pull-request record + +No GitHub pull request exists for branch `ln/fe-xxxx-re-oracle-runbooks` at close time, so there was no PR description to update. This file is the retained close record; any later PR must link it and preserve the accepted limitations above. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-archive/4-accepted-prompt-skill-workpiece-architecture.md similarity index 88% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-archive/4-accepted-prompt-skill-workpiece-architecture.md index a542440d969..54f2390276e 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-archive/4-accepted-prompt-skill-workpiece-architecture.md @@ -2,9 +2,15 @@ ## Status -Live. Amended close contract owner-accepted on 2026-09-02. This file is execution authority for [FE-1563](https://linear.app/hash/issue/FE-1563/redesign-the-elicitation-runbook-and-workpiece-against-the-frozen). +Closed on 2026-09-02 with the owner-selected prompt, skill, and workpiece architecture promoted and accepted as baseline-competitive with explicit limitations. This archived contract is no longer execution authority. Mission 5 remains uncut and unimplemented. -Mission 3's prospective campaign is the immutable control: one invalid runtime member and two valid independently graded workpieces, with the adjudicated range in [`docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md`](docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md). Its observed artifacts and source revision `b738aa1be1a62a9f9cdde89ced78558f04293a77` remain the exact v1 instrument of record. +Close evidence: + +- [`../evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/campaign-adjudication.md`](../evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/campaign-adjudication.md) compares the one valid candidate workpiece only with the latest two valid flat-prompt controls: omniscient `72.5 / 100`, cold `3.2 / 4`, conditional readiness, and no hard-failure gate. +- [`../evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/product-witness.md`](../evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/product-witness.md) records the accepted local/restricted Petrinaut → AI SDK → production Flue `ChatAgent` witness, the exposed relative-resource-path failure, and the owner-authorized exact-URI repair. +- [`../evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/mission-5-handoff.md`](../evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/mission-5-handoff.md) freezes the selected workpiece, exact source snapshot and message binding, candidate manifest, grades, adjudication, and remaining gaps. + +Mission 3's prospective campaign remains the immutable control: one invalid runtime member and two valid independently graded workpieces, with the adjudicated range in [`../evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md`](../evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md). Its observed artifacts and source revision `b738aa1be1a62a9f9cdde89ced78558f04293a77` remain the exact v1 instrument of record. ### Accepted architecture and interaction decisions @@ -104,4 +110,4 @@ Stop and surface the evidence if: Mission 5 owns capture-backed review and the first visible evidence-backed “why” answer over the frozen prepared pair. Mission 6 owns automatic traceable projection into one meaningful live SDCPN region. Mission 7 owns bounded authorized reviewer revision and scoped net patching. Mission 8's deployment branch stopped after local application proof and retains the unresolved infrastructure/release gates. Mission 9 owns the eventual accepted optimisation handoff after its consumer contract exists. -The inferential observer, host/session continuity beyond the fixed local witness, compaction, voice, broad observability, simulated-conversation viewing, remote release, and public product choice remain in [`MISSION.next.md`](MISSION.next.md) unless the real Mission 4 throughline exposes a direct blocker. No deferred item is implementation authority here. +The inferential observer, host/session continuity beyond the fixed local witness, compaction, voice, broad observability, simulated-conversation viewing, remote release, and public product choice remain in [`../../MISSION.next.md`](../../MISSION.next.md). No deferred item is implementation authority here. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-archive/README.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-archive/README.md index e49040eb656..226003771fd 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-archive/README.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-archive/README.md @@ -6,3 +6,4 @@ Closed `MISSION.md` files, moved here on close or explicit owner-directed branch - [`2-mechanical-capture-sweep.md`](2-mechanical-capture-sweep.md) — Mission 2, accepted 2026-08-27. - [`3-structurally-typed-runbook-to-headless-pn.md`](3-structurally-typed-runbook-to-headless-pn.md) — Mission 3, closed 2026-08-31 with the runbook/workpiece path accepted and real-model construction falsified on the exercised route. - [`4-owner-led-runbook-and-workpiece-redesign.md`](4-owner-led-runbook-and-workpiece-redesign.md) — Mission 4, closed for branch transition by owner direction on 2026-09-01; this archive does not independently adjudicate every proof item. +- [`4-accepted-prompt-skill-workpiece-architecture.md`](4-accepted-prompt-skill-workpiece-architecture.md) — Mission 4, accepted 2026-09-02 as baseline-competitive with explicit quality, routing, and campaign limitations. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/5-capture-backed-review.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/5-capture-backed-review.md index e43095f34c4..4ca63db1a99 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/5-capture-backed-review.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/5-capture-backed-review.md @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ A fresh builder must resolve the current repository and the deployment handoff rather than treating this draft as a specification: -- [`../../MISSION.md`](../../MISSION.md) — sole execution authority; consume the selected frozen Mission 4 workpiece, exact source Flue conversation, candidate instrument manifest, and comparative adjudication only after Mission 4 has actually produced and accepted them. +- [`../mission-archive/4-accepted-prompt-skill-workpiece-architecture.md`](../mission-archive/4-accepted-prompt-skill-workpiece-architecture.md) and [`../evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/mission-5-handoff.md`](../evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/mission-5-handoff.md) — accepted Mission 4 authority, selected frozen workpiece, exact source Flue snapshot, candidate instrument manifest, comparative adjudication, visible witness, and carried limitations. - [`../../MISSION.next.md`](../../MISSION.next.md) — compact future spine, FE-1476 product frame, shared proof obligations, standing locks, and any later evidence admitted after this draft was written. - [`../mission-archive/2-mechanical-capture-sweep.md`](../mission-archive/2-mechanical-capture-sweep.md) — accepted mechanical capture throughline, exact close evidence, empty-payload boundary, conversation identity, and carried flags. - [`../mission-archive/3-structurally-typed-runbook-to-headless-pn.md`](../mission-archive/3-structurally-typed-runbook-to-headless-pn.md) and [`../evidence/implementations/fe-1525-headless-runbook-pn.md`](../evidence/implementations/fe-1525-headless-runbook-pn.md) — accepted runbook/workpiece leg, falsified real-model construction leg, and the distinction between a hermetic non-empty fixture and vacuous empty-net parser success. @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ A fresh builder must resolve the current repository and the deployment handoff r - On that branch, inspect `apps/brunch-agent/src/db.ts`, `src/postgres.ts`, `src/database-config.ts`, `test/postgres.test.ts`, `test/database-config.test.ts`, and `test/container-smoke.integration.ts`. Mission 5 activates capture as product data and therefore must use a durable implementation at the claimed replacement boundary; task-local JSON is not an admissible deployed capture store. - [`../../../petrinaut/docs/ai-assistant.md`](../../../petrinaut/docs/ai-assistant.md) and the other Petrinaut user-guide pages that mention the affected panel flow. Any user-visible change requires same-change documentation and a prompt to replace screenshots if they become stale. -The selected workpiece, source conversation, prebuilt SDCPN, and derivation fixture do not yet have honest canonical paths. They are a Mission 4 exit join and Mission 5 preparation obligation, not names to invent here. +The selected workpiece and source conversation are frozen in the Mission 5 handoff above. An honest prebuilt non-empty SDCPN and derivation fixture still have no canonical paths; they remain Mission 5 preparation obligations, not names to invent here. ## Visible product advance @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ Do not carry selected-pair provenance breadth, capture durability, owner refusal | Panel executes client tools and resumes one turn through AI SDK | Existing `apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.test.ts` plus `libs/@hashintel/petrinaut/src/ui/views/Editor/panels/ai-assistant-panel.test.tsx`, test `adds one dynamic output and sends one automatic follow-up`. Run `yarn workspace @apps/brunch-agent test:unit` and `yarn workspace @hashintel/petrinaut test:unit --run`. | | Mission 3 workpiece is recoverable and cold-readable; empty paid net is semantically false | Existing `docs/evidence/implementations/fe-1525-headless-runbook-pn.md` and `docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md`; artifact inspection is the oracle. | | Mission 8 application contract is locally verified but remote replacement remains open | `157730cc5a214dd9c543e8d95c7193a219c48aef:libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/implementations/mission-8-deployment-handoff.md`: exact recorded commands include `yarn workspace @apps/brunch-agent lint:tsc`, `lint:eslint`, `test:unit`, `build`, `build:docker`, and `turbo run test:unit --filter='@hashintel/brunch-agent...'`, plus native arm64, explicit `linux/amd64`, and Docker/Postgres/collector smoke. The handoff explicitly is not remote proof. | -| Selected Mission 4 workpiece, exact conversation, manifest, and adjudication are accepted | **ORACLE GAP:** Mission 4 is still live in this branch. Resolve by naming its frozen candidate paths and owner acceptance/adjudication before this draft can be cut. | +| Selected Mission 4 workpiece, exact conversation, manifest, and adjudication are accepted | Closed by `vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/mission-5-handoff.md`: one selected pre-repair scored workpiece, canonical raw snapshot, source-message binding, instrument manifest, comparative reports/adjudication, owner acceptance, and explicit routing/sample limitations. | | Every consequential element in the selected prebuilt pair has a derivation or explicit unsupported disposition | **ORACLE GAP:** no selected pair or inventory exists. Resolve with a frozen element inventory mechanically compared with the derivation fixture and human inspection of every unsupported disposition. | | One typed name/id yields an evidence-grounded answer and broken link yields visible refusal in deployed panel | **ORACLE GAP:** no existing test or deployed witness exercises this operation. At cut time bind it to the exact production-path test and a human panel witness; do not count a server-only fixture. | | Capture/workpiece/derivation survive the actual claimed replacement boundary | **ORACLE GAP:** deployment branch stopped before remote task replacement and left capture inactive. Resolve with one immutable image, selected durable store, process restart and cross-host replacement inspection against the same ids. | @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ Do not carry selected-pair provenance breadth, capture durability, owner refusal ## Inputs and joins -- **Mission 4 exit join:** selected frozen Markdown workpiece, exact source Flue conversation/range, exact candidate instrument manifest, comparative evaluation/adjudication, and any smallest remaining workpiece gap. Join fails if these are merely branch-tip files without a frozen identity. +- **Mission 4 exit join:** consume `vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/mission-5-handoff.md` and its hashed selected artifacts. Preserve the distinction between the scored pre-repair instrument and the owner-authorized post-campaign URI instruction repair; carry the missing-template/reference disclosure and acquisition gaps rather than laundering them into derivation rationale. - **Mission 2 join:** explicit `applyCaptureSweep`-style harness operation, evidence archive, capture idempotency, owner key, and no interviewer scheduling. Reuse mechanics only after inspecting current contracts; do not revive generalized typed elicitation. - **Prebuilt fixture join:** identified preparer, stable net element ids, current workpiece references, capture evidence references, projection rationale, and explicit unsupported dispositions. The pair must be non-empty and semantically inspectable. - **Mission 8 join:** consume the landed application contract and the open infrastructure handoff accurately. Mission 5 must add durable capture/product-state scope before claiming replacement durability, then join to actual ECS/RDS/collector/ingress identity supplied by infrastructure. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/6-traceable-projection.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/6-traceable-projection.md index 7eddf5a8aa7..b4a36bf137b 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/6-traceable-projection.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/6-traceable-projection.md @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ A fresh builder must resolve these authorities and evidence before choosing a mechanism: -- [`../../MISSION.md`](../../MISSION.md) — sole execution authority. Mission 6 may be cut only after Mission 4 and Mission 5 have actually closed their accepted joins. +- [`../mission-archive/4-accepted-prompt-skill-workpiece-architecture.md`](../mission-archive/4-accepted-prompt-skill-workpiece-architecture.md) and [`../evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/mission-5-handoff.md`](../evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/mission-5-handoff.md) — accepted Mission 4 architecture and exact successor join. Mission 6 may be cut only after Mission 5 has closed its accepted join. - [`../../MISSION.next.md`](../../MISSION.next.md) — compact future spine, FE-1476 floor, cross-mission obligations, standing locks, and current Mission 7 handoff. - [`5-capture-backed-review.md`](5-capture-backed-review.md) — provisional predecessor contract. At cut time replace assumptions with Mission 5's accepted archive/evidence and exact current workpiece/derivation seam. - [`../mission-archive/3-structurally-typed-runbook-to-headless-pn.md`](../mission-archive/3-structurally-typed-runbook-to-headless-pn.md) and [`../evidence/implementations/fe-1525-headless-runbook-pn.md`](../evidence/implementations/fe-1525-headless-runbook-pn.md) — accepted workpiece leg, canonical callback fixture, provider-visible nested-schema failure, vacuous empty-net result, and explicit next-boundary decision. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md index f451d9b0100..1219d32f953 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md @@ -6,14 +6,14 @@ A fresh builder must read these sources before cutting or implementing this cluster: -- [`MISSION.md`](../../MISSION.md) — sole execution authority and the current Mission 4 workpiece decisions. +- [`../mission-archive/4-accepted-prompt-skill-workpiece-architecture.md`](../mission-archive/4-accepted-prompt-skill-workpiece-architecture.md) and [`../evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/mission-5-handoff.md`](../evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/mission-5-handoff.md) — accepted Mission 4 workpiece decisions, exact selected artifact, and carried limitations. - [`MISSION.next.md`](../../MISSION.next.md) — compact shared frame, standing locks, and current mission joins. - [`README.md`](README.md) — durable draft authority, lifecycle, conversion, and oracle-gap rules. - [`docs/mission-archive/2-mechanical-capture-sweep.md`](../mission-archive/2-mechanical-capture-sweep.md) — exact-evidence capture, idempotency, Flue-history authority, and model-free scheduling. - [`docs/mission-archive/3-structurally-typed-runbook-to-headless-pn.md`](../mission-archive/3-structurally-typed-runbook-to-headless-pn.md) — accepted workpiece leg and falsified provider-schema construction leg. - [`evaluations/oracles/ir-quality-ruler-v1.md`](../../evaluations/oracles/ir-quality-ruler-v1.md) and [`evaluations/protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1/cold-ir-reviewer.md`](../../evaluations/protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1/cold-ir-reviewer.md) — current conservation, grounding, conflict-collapse, and cold-reading criteria; neither is yet a successive-revision oracle. - [`docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md`](../evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md) — healthy foreground-turn range, costly whole-workpiece synthesis, and observed correction handling. -- [`packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md`](../../packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md), [`packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md), and [`packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/ir-template.md`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/ir-template.md) — current foreground lifecycle and workpiece correction behavior. +- [`packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md`](../../packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md), [`packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md), and [`packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md) — current foreground lifecycle and workpiece correction behavior. - [`apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.test.ts`](../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.test.ts), [`apps/brunch-agent/test/headless-petrinaut-client.test.ts`](../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/test/headless-petrinaut-client.test.ts), and [`packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts) — current real door, bounded mutation subset, and its limits. - [`5-capture-backed-review.md`](5-capture-backed-review.md) and [`6-traceable-projection.md`](6-traceable-projection.md) — provisional inherited artifacts, provenance seam, projection contract, and stable-identity obligations. Re-resolve these joins against accepted close evidence at cut time rather than assuming draft hypotheses landed. - Commit `157730cc5a214dd9c543e8d95c7193a219c48aef` on deployment branch `ln/fe-1569-brunch-agent-deployment`, especially `libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/implementations/mission-8-deployment-handoff.md` — local application contract and the still-open infrastructure proof that any deployed durability claim must consume. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/9-optimisation-handoff.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/9-optimisation-handoff.md index 824cec5a18c..a90476b838a 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/9-optimisation-handoff.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/9-optimisation-handoff.md @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ A fresh builder must read these durable sources before deepening this cluster: -- [`../../MISSION.md`](../../MISSION.md) — sole execution authority. +- [`../mission-archive/4-accepted-prompt-skill-workpiece-architecture.md`](../mission-archive/4-accepted-prompt-skill-workpiece-architecture.md) and the eventual accepted Mission 5–7 archives — inherited authority; this draft creates no live mission. - [`../../MISSION.next.md`](../../MISSION.next.md) and [`README.md`](README.md) — shared frame, standing locks, draft authority, and lifecycle. - [`7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md`](7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md) and the eventual accepted Mission 5–7 close evidence — inherited real-path artifacts and proof. Draft promises are not join evidence. - [`../mission-archive/3-structurally-typed-runbook-to-headless-pn.md`](../mission-archive/3-structurally-typed-runbook-to-headless-pn.md) — accepted workpiece leg, falsified real-model construction, and the parser-valid-empty warning. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/README.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/README.md index 6b6e023915d..4c78eb00629 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/README.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/README.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # Provisional mission drafts -Files in this directory are detailed context repositories for possible future missions. They are not execution authority, do not create live missions, and must not be implemented. [`MISSION.md`](../../MISSION.md) is the sole execution authority; [`MISSION.next.md`](../../MISSION.next.md) is the compact future spine and links to drafts without duplicating their detailed contracts. +Files in this directory are detailed context repositories for possible future missions. They are not execution authority, do not create live missions, and must not be implemented. No mission is currently live; [`MISSION.next.md`](../../MISSION.next.md) is the compact future spine. A draft must be re-evaluated and converted into a new root `MISSION.md` on its own issue, branch, and PR before implementation. Each planning item has one authoritative planning home across `MISSION.next.md` and these linked drafts. A spine summary is only a pointer. Keep accepted decisions, rejected alternatives and reasons, re-entry conditions, scenario classes, evidence, constraints, fog, stop conditions, risks, assumptions, and named mechanisms in one discoverable home at the precision needed by a cold-start builder. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md deleted file mode 100644 index 6c8049566df..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/SYSTEM.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,27 +0,0 @@ -# Universal Elicitation - -You are the Brunch elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select. - -## Purpose-relative attention - -Establish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Spend questions on distinctions that could affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category. - -## Interaction - -Use the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame. - -## Authorship and uncertainty - -Keep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Do not invent content, silently increase precision, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. When accounts differ, establish whether the relationship is correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before reconciling them. - -## Target transformation and evidence - -Keep source intent and evidence, the recoverable account, target-formalism transformation, evidence from checks, and claims about the surrounding system distinct. A parser, validator, simulator, verifier, compiler, or execution result establishes only the named property of the exact artifact under stated assumptions. It does not establish that the transformation captures the person's intent or that unexamined integrations are correct. - -## Workpiece, stopping, and delivery - -Maintain the supplied recoverable workpiece as understanding develops. Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible. - -## Extension contract - -Target-specific guidance may add Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, and Verification or narrow their applicability. It does not silently weaken these universal invariants. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md deleted file mode 100644 index 449d3f7066e..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,214 +0,0 @@ -# Universal Elicitation Reference - -This reference contains detailed elicitation and revision guidance that applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin may add context or narrower guidance under the same registers. Where it is silent, this reference still applies. - -The registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information a useful account may need. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece. - -## Directives - -### Work from purpose - -Establish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target representation has a place for it. - -### Accumulate posture conversationally - -Learn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form. - -### Follow the person's account - -Use the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account. - -### Protect interaction bandwidth - -Do not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time. - -### Preserve authorship and uncertainty - -Keep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not. - -Preserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking result. - -### Treat divergence as information - -Do not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes. - -### Maintain a recoverable workpiece - -Record useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached. - -### Stop honestly - -Completion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible. - -## Recognition - -Recognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question. - -### Vague or compressed language - -Words such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it. - -### Normative language - -“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists. - -### Tension within or between accounts - -An answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood. - -### Unexplained terms and artifacts - -Local terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading. - -### Burden, impatience, or limited availability - -These are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly. - -### Diminishing yield - -Several turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question. - -### Assent without independent wording - -Quick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content. - -### Silence and absence - -Material may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds. - -## Operations - -Choose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule. - -### Select the smallest consequential absence - -Compare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it. - -### Slice a concrete case - -Walk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify parameters you introduced. - -### Sweep one property - -After a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category. - -### Ask for the last occurrence - -When a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons. - -### Ask for the basis - -Ask how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement. - -### Ground a term or artifact - -Ask for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts. - -### Clarify until observable - -Clarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what its terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe. - -### Use contrastive cases - -When ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies. - -### Investigate quantities relative to purpose - -Before deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency. - -### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold - -When an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose. - -### State a contradiction without resolving it - -Put the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them. - -### Restate for correction - -Offer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept. - -### Propose structure for correction - -When low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it. - -### Deposit and defer - -When an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit. - -### Press without trapping - -When time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed. - -### Explore a rare or severe outcome - -Use a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment. - -### Seek a witness or counterexample - -Ask for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule. - -### Trade concrete outcomes - -When a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate. - -### Close with one correction opportunity - -Before a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage. - -## Coverage - -Coverage is a universal information contract for a recoverable account. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. A plugin adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model. - -A workpiece may need to preserve: - -- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation; -- a cold-readable account in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms; -- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on; -- decisions, alternatives, and reasons distinctions among them matter; -- observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that discriminate interpretations or outcomes; -- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording; -- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship; -- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked; -- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation; -- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and contextual coexistence; -- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; and -- open questions with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning. - -Coverage depth follows the purpose. A category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible. - -## Verification - -Verification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence. - -### Before asking - -- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty. -- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template. -- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame. -- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours. - -### Before recording - -- Every load-bearing claim is supported by the person's account or visibly marked as agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default. -- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule. -- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence. -- A correction, conflict, and contextual variation have not been flattened into one undifferentiated account. - -### Before closing - -- The result's purpose and consequential account have been offered for correction. -- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting. -- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category. -- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion. - -### Failure signals and repairs - -- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker. -- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty. -- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption. -- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it. -- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency remains unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire. -- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps. -- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition. -- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md deleted file mode 100644 index 194d51818c0..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,11 +0,0 @@ -# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN - -Specialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece. - -Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive interviewing, workpiece revision, or construction. - -During interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish. - -Use mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. Do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, valid, or simulatable net without corresponding tool evidence. When evidence or capabilities are insufficient, deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report instead. - -When the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md deleted file mode 100644 index a055797ae38..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,50 +0,0 @@ ---- -name: sdcpn-modelling -description: Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct a checked SDCPN when Petrinaut capabilities are available. Use for a process-modelling interview, Petri net, or analysis or revision of either artifact. ---- - -# Capability-aware lifecycle - -Use one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit or revise, maintain the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and deliver. The current conversation may expose only one branch of that lifecycle. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred. - -## Select the runtime branch - -### Interactive elicitation or revision - -Interview in the person's operational vocabulary. Read `universal-elicitation.md` and `sdcpn-elicitation.md` before substantive questions or revision. Read `workpiece-template.md` when creating or materially revising the shared workpiece. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation. - -### Construct-only execution - -Use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md`, then use the mounted construction tools. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in this conversation. - -## Procedure - -### Orient - -Establish enough purpose and context to select one focused next action: the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, and available time. Orientation need not settle every concern before elicitation begins. - -### Elicit or revise - -For a new account, follow one concrete case and re-evaluate the active gap after each useful answer. For an existing account, first locate the disputed or changed material and its consequence for the objective. Use the two elicitation references for detailed operations and coverage; do not turn their register order into question order. - -### Maintain the workpiece - -Treat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve unrelated material unless new evidence affects it. - -Whenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit it again before construction and before workpiece-only delivery. A delta or prose promise is not a recoverable workpiece. - -### Construct - -Construct only from the current workpiece. Read `pn-construction.md` and `checks.md` before beginning. Use mounted Petrinaut tools for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting free-form net JSON. If the required tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes. - -Construction may infer a representation from recorded operational meaning; it may not invent operational facts. Record construction inferences, approximations, defaults, and target losses in the workpiece. - -### Check and deliver - -Apply `checks.md` whenever construction is prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in every branch. Deliver a net only when the mounted tool path has produced and checked one. State what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target or current tools could not represent. - -An explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the best current workpiece and any already-checked net with limitations visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview. - -## Resource discipline - -Read resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md deleted file mode 100644 index 6f2dcb443fb..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,127 +0,0 @@ -# SDCPN Construction - -Read this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model. - -Construction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete. - -## Construction boundary - -Before constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case. - -If materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path. - -When Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit free-form net JSON. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net. - -## Mapping principles - -| Recorded operational meaning | Possible SDCPN interpretation | -| --- | --- | -| Things that flow, are acted on, or do work | Typed tokens and colour elements when distinctions change behavior | -| Initial populations, arrivals, departures, calendars, and external inputs | Initial marking, parameters, boundary conditions, or source and sink transitions where representable | -| Logical activities | Transitions, factored into start, in-progress state, and completion only when timing or resource semantics require it | -| Waiting, availability, and occupied state | Places derived from the activities and conditions on either side, not independently elicited queue nodes | -| Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules | Arcs, guards, priorities, and explicit enabling state | -| Resource consumption, reservation, release, and read-only use | Consumed tokens, held and returned resource tokens, or read behavior | -| Continuous change | Dynamics on real-valued colour elements when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential | -| Metrics and objectives | Simulation metrics where representable; qualitative goals and unsupported weights remain in the workpiece | -| Data bindings and validation criteria | Workpiece obligations until a separate integration represents them | - -A physical location becomes target structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. A simulation scenario is assembled from initial state, boundary conditions, parameters, and candidate policies rather than represented as one process node. - -## Petrinaut tool sequence - -When the corresponding tools are mounted: - -1. Call `getLatestNetDefinition` before changing the net. -2. Add only workpiece-supported token types and tunable parameters with `addType` and `addParameter`. -3. Add places and transitions with `addPlace` and `addTransition`; establish stable identifiers before connecting them. -4. Add connections with `addArc`. Arc weights are positive token multiplicities, not switches for mutually exclusive modes. -5. Re-inspect with `getLatestNetDefinition` after each dependent stage and at the end. -6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial. - -The mounted schemas, not this prose, govern exact payload fields. - -## Construction patterns - -Patterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts. - -### Timed work - -When a logical activity occupies consequential time, represent start, in-progress state, and completion separately. Preserve what remains occupied while work runs. Use a constant or named parameter when only a typical duration is supported; do not invent a distribution family or tail. - -### Conditional or probabilistic outcome - -Represent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled paths. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; preserve a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition when available, or report the gap. - -### Contended resource - -Hold available instances in shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required tokens; competing work cannot use them while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available. Preserve changed wear, qualification, location, or other consequential state on return. - -Compile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded. - -### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs - -- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records. -- **Reserved:** remove or lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release. -- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work. - -Confirm that the target's actual arc semantics implement the intended use; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning. - -### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite - -Represent the observable enabling condition and the event or actor that changes it. Use a guard, state place, external source, or timed event appropriate to the workpiece. Preserve overrides rather than silently weakening the gate. - -### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement - -Represent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group stays together and any split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not infer a preferred batch size from a maximum. - -### Mode change - -Represent source and destination availability states with directional transitions when setup, changeover, restart, handover, or reconfiguration changes behavior. Attach time, material, scrap, or capacity loss to the direction where it occurs. - -### Event, failure, retry, and recovery - -Represent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Place the return path at the recorded retry scope: failed activity, repeated subsequence, whole-case restart, diversion, or scrap. Preserve the work, state, and occupied resources that survive or reset. - -### Continuous quantity and threshold - -Carry a changing quantity in state with the supported evolution law. Fire consequential behavior at the recorded threshold and add a reset only when one is supported. Omit a floating continuous variable that affects no objective or process behavior. - -### Spatial transfer - -Represent transfer as an activity when location change consumes time or resources. Reserve transport capacity when contended and preserve origin-to-destination dependence when supported. - -### Hidden waiting - -Derive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. An intermediate place may be required, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object. - -## Inference, approximation, and target loss - -Name every representational choice not directly supported by the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and route to checking in the workpiece. - -Potentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible: - -- collapsing several named micro-steps when no objective depends on their internal order; -- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value; -- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated purpose; -- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; and -- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning. - -Not acceptable: - -- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic operations knowledge; -- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values; -- interpreting “unknown” as a conventional distribution; -- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior; -- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; or -- claiming a net is loadable, valid, or simulated without corresponding tool evidence. - -Record workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without usable metrics, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, and contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification. - -## Existing-net analysis and bounded change - -Start from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and the desired delta. - -Do not claim general net revision unless mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With an add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal. Never simulate replacement by adding competing elements beside obsolete ones. - -After a supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences changed, and which assumptions or losses opened or closed. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md deleted file mode 100644 index 03f52743f82..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/sdcpn-elicitation.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,222 +0,0 @@ -# Operational-Process and SDCPN Elicitation - -This reference adds operational-process and SDCPN-specific guidance to `universal-elicitation.md`. Apply both under the same registers. The additions below do not restate or replace universal elicitation guidance. - -The registers are not a questionnaire or phase sequence. **Recognition** suggests what may be present. **Operations** select ways to investigate an active gap. **Coverage** says what the operational account may need to explain. **Verification** checks the current interview and workpiece. Petri-net construction mechanics remain in `pn-construction.md` and are not interview vocabulary. - -## Directives - -### Build the operational account the purpose needs - -For the person's simulation question, comparison, or decision, establish what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, how outcomes are judged, and what observation would make the model credible enough for its intended use. - -Every objective needs a traceable dependency on process material. Do not collect operational detail merely because the target could represent it, and do not record the person's prediction of an objective's answer as process structure. - -### Keep target structure backstage - -Ask about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, target schemas, and workpiece headings may guide attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions. - -### Preserve operational context - -A value without its applicable item, activity, direction, mode, operating regime, calendar, load, location, resource, or other condition may simulate as a falsehood. Preserve context when the operation treats cases differently. Keep quantities at the granularity the operation or available source can observe, and do not average distinct regimes merely to obtain one parameter. - -### Treat operational patterns as hypotheses - -Recurring operational shapes expose conditional information needs; they do not generate facts or model elements. Ask whether a shape is present and let the person's account supply its structure and vocabulary. - -## Recognition - -Recognition entries identify possibilities to test, not facts to record automatically or reasons to abandon the active conversational thread. - -### Language and account signals - -- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, practiced decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction among kinds of work or resource. -- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, unavailable resource, calendar, or uncontrolled boundary input. -- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate a constraint, policy, enforcement mechanism, or unexamined exception. -- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a consequential threshold, or a directional mode change. -- **Duration that crosses a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may depend on availability rather than work time alone. -- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, dataset, or location named in passing** may participate as performer, contended resource, prerequisite, information source, transport concern, boundary, or merely context. -- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what starts or enables work rather than an ordinary process activity. - -### Operational situation patterns - -#### Timed work - -An activity occupies time or timing affects the objective. Possible distinctions include start and finish, what remains unavailable while it runs, typical versus tail duration, and dependence on load, kind, calendar, location, or resource availability. - -#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome - -An activity is not guaranteed to succeed or different next states may follow. Possible distinctions include what decides the outcome, what each path produces, whether an observed rate exists, which contexts alter it, and what recovery follows. - -#### Contended resource - -Several activities or cases want the same person, machine, bay, vehicle, tool, space, or capability. Possible distinctions include count, indivisibility, joint staffing, eligibility, reservation and release, practiced priority, tie-breaking, overrides, and changed state on return. - -#### Consumed, reserved, or read input - -An activity may consume or transform an input, reserve it so others cannot use it until release, or read it without making it unavailable. The same named thing may play different roles in different activities. - -#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite - -Work becomes enabled by an observable event or condition. Possible distinctions include what is observed, who or what changes it, where it is visible, whether it is external, and what can override it. - -#### Continuous quantity and threshold - -A level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other quantity changes while no discrete activity occurs. Possible distinctions include direction and rate, noise or spread, consequential thresholds, triggered effects, and reset behavior. - -#### Mode change - -Setup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next. Possible distinctions include direction, time, scrap, material, capacity, and effects beyond the local activity. - -#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement - -Work moves or is processed in groups. Possible distinctions include the grouping unit, minimum or preferred size, count-versus-clock release, whether members stay together, splitting or merging, and the cost of breaking the group. - -#### Spatial transfer - -A change of location consumes time, capacity, or a transport resource or changes eligibility. Possible distinctions include what moves, origin and destination, duration by direction, transport contention, and whether the transfer is inside the modeled boundary. - -#### Event, failure, retry, and recovery - -A disruption befalls the operation rather than advancing normal work, or a case repeats part or all of its process. Possible distinctions include occurrence, affected work and resources, duration, retry scope, surviving state, rollback or compensation, retry limit, diversion, and terminal outcome. - -#### Policy under pressure - -More than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. Possible distinctions include posted and practiced rules, local judgment, tie-breaking, exception authority, and the conditions selecting a different rule. - -#### Hidden waiting - -A gap between activities may be caused by unavailable input, contention, a calendar, release policy, batching, transport, approval, or recovery. Waiting is evidence to explain through surrounding behavior, not automatically an activity or independently elicited node. - -## Operations - -Use the universal Operations as the primary interviewing repertoire. These additions bind them to operational-process concerns. - -### Choose the case unit before slicing - -When several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Follow it from admission or trigger to termination or handoff. - -### Link the slice to the objective - -As the case unfolds, note which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated objective depends on. If the objective depends on nothing yet recorded, continue the case rather than collecting detached detail. - -### Expose the process spine - -Ask what starts the case, what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs and why, and what ends the case. A list of activities without order, triggers, or outcomes is not a process spine. - -### Sweep operational concerns, not headings - -After a slice, choose one property that matters to the objective and examine it across the relevant things already discovered. Useful sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, contextual variation, practiced policy, failure and recovery, boundary behavior, or evidence quality. - -### Distinguish consumed, reserved, and read inputs - -For each load-bearing activity and input, ask whether the input is used up or transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. If reserved, establish when and in what state it returns. - -### Sweep what can befall an activity - -Across the activities exposed by a slice, investigate relevant disruptions: work-item failure, deadline expiry, unavailable resource, external event, and constraint violation. Establish what happens to the work, the case, occupied resources, and recovery. - -### Test practiced policy with a borderline case - -When a stated rule decides what happens next, ask about the last contested or exceptional case to expose tie-breaking, overrides, and the conditions selecting a different practiced rule. - -### Close a resource account - -For a contended resource, establish usable instance count or an honest unknown, eligibility, joint requirements, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, changed state on return, and the rule used when demand exceeds availability. - -### Close a mode change in both directions - -Ask whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether losses propagate beyond the local activity. Preserve time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences separately when the operation does. - -### Turn waiting into a causal question - -Ask what the case is waiting for and what observable event makes it able to continue. Record the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or disruption rather than treating waiting itself as an activity. - -### Ask what is conserved - -When quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. Treat the answer as a constraint only when the person's account supports it. - -### Establish retry scope - -Ask whether failure repeats one activity, a subsequence, or the whole case; diverts or scraps the case; and which work, state, and occupied resources survive or reset. - -### Establish validation from observable behavior - -Ask what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the model credible for its intended question. Preserve validation evidence separately from the process behavior it tests. - -## Coverage - -Coverage identifies what the process-model workpiece may need for the stated purpose and downstream SDCPN construction. It is neither question order nor a demand to populate irrelevant categories. - -### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds - -Preserve what the model must answer or compare, for whom, what should improve or be avoided, what may be varied, what “better” means, and any importance, trade-off, safety condition, tolerated probability, or threshold the person can actually judge. Qualitative goals must not be forced into invented scalar weights. - -### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions - -Preserve what is inside and outside, what enters or leaves, what starts or resumes a case, calendars and availability, approvals or instructions, external events, initial populations, and the reliability of boundary inputs where consequential. - -### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources - -Preserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; relevant carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and how locations or transfers affect behavior. - -### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use - -For each consequential logical activity, preserve its operational name, prerequisites, performer, inputs, whether each input is consumed, reserved, or read, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, and contextual variation. One logical activity may later require several Petri-net elements; do not split it into target nodes during elicitation. - -### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery - -Preserve activity order, what decides branches and joins, what can interrupt normal flow, conditions for unhappy paths, retry and recovery scope, what happens to work and resources, and terminal outcomes. - -### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior - -Preserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, contextual dependence, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets at the precision the evidence supports. - -### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes - -Preserve rules applied when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed versus practiced accounts, and the context in which each account holds. - -### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings - -Preserve how the person would know the model is credible, what observations or historical data could test it, which variables a real feed might drive, the source or dataset for each binding, who or what could answer missing values, and where evidence remains unavailable. - -### Things not independently elicited as target nodes - -- A queue, buffer, or waiting state is ordinarily explained by surrounding activities and conditions and may emerge as construction structure. -- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies at simulation time. -- A resource is an operational role combining relevant identity, capacity, availability, acquisition, release, and policy; it has no single universal target shape. -- A physical location becomes target structure only through a recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a Petri-net place. - -## Verification - -Apply these checks while eliciting and maintaining the workpiece. Construction and delivery checks live in `checks.md`. - -### Purpose and process - -- At least one simulation question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms. -- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported. -- A concrete case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, relevant branch conditions, and an outcome or handoff. - -### Operational semantics - -- Load-bearing inputs are distinguished as consumed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. -- A contended resource has count or an honest unknown, acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and practiced contention policy where required. -- Failure records the fate of the work, retry scope, surviving state, occupied resources, recovery, and terminal result where consequential. -- Hidden waiting has not silently become an activity or unexplained queue. -- Mode-change and spatial-transfer effects preserve direction and context where they differ. - -### Quantities and context - -- A duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains the item, activity, mode, direction, load, location, calendar, or other condition that selects it. -- A point value stands only where constancy or a purpose-relative simplification is supported and named. -- Prescribed and practiced regimes or contextual variants have not been averaged into one false value. - -### Failure signals and repairs - -- **Unsupported objective:** the model question depends on no recorded process material. Return to a concrete case that bears on it. -- **Dead process spine:** activities exist but their order, triggers, or outcomes do not. Continue the slice or ask the smallest connecting question. -- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired but its release or changed return state is missing. Re-enter resource-use Coverage. -- **Practice laundering:** a document's rule is recorded as practice without an operational case. Use a borderline or last-occurrence operation. -- **Context collapse:** values differing by item, direction, mode, location, load, or source regime become one unconditional value. Restore the selecting context. -- **Pattern-generated fact:** a situation pattern supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove or mark the assumption, then ask whether the pattern applies. -- **Target leakage:** questions are framed as places, transitions, arcs, or workpiece fields. Translate back to operational events, conditions, things, and consequences. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md deleted file mode 100644 index 69d0845b87f..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,116 +0,0 @@ -# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks - -Read this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. For workpiece-only delivery, apply the universal and plugin Verification registers without loading this construction resource. - -A failed check triggers the smallest relevant repair available in the current runtime branch: amend the workpiece, ask during interactive elicitation, revise construction, or report a visible limitation and re-entry question for a later conversation. - -## Evidence levels - -Report the highest level actually reached. Passing one level does not imply the next. - -### 1. Tool-schema acceptance - -The mounted construction tools accepted the submitted payloads, and the latest inspected definition contains the accepted changes. This establishes conformance to those tool input schemas and the shape returned by inspection. It does not establish correspondence with the workpiece, reachability, resource conservation, exclusivity over executions, loadability in another consumer, or simulated behavior. - -### 2. Agent-reviewed structural correspondence - -The agent compared the inspected definition with the workpiece and found visible structures corresponding to the recorded process. This can establish that named elements, connections, candidate paths, guards, resource-return structures, and parameters are present and apparently aligned. It remains a review judgment over static structure, not behavioral proof. - -### 3. Behavioral execution or stronger analysis - -An actual simulation, state-space exploration, invariant check, or other named analysis exercised the constructed definition. State exactly which method, scenario, initial state, parameters, paths, and observations were covered. A simulation run establishes only the behavior observed in that run; a universal claim such as “resources cannot leak” requires an analysis whose scope genuinely covers every relevant execution. - -If no behavioral execution or stronger analysis occurred, say so. Do not convert tool acceptance or visual inspection into behavioral validation. - -## Before construction - -- The intended question, comparison, or decision is stated in the person's terms. -- The boundary and a meaningful concrete case are cold-readable from the workpiece. -- The process spine says what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, where waiting comes from, and what outcome or handoff ends it. -- Inputs that matter are distinguished as consumed, reserved/released, or read. -- Required resource availability and release are recorded or visibly unknown. -- Consequential quantities retain their context and supported precision. -- Practiced and prescribed rules, corrections, conflicts, and contextual variants are not silently collapsed. -- Construction can proceed without recovering a load-bearing fact from transcript memory. -- Assumptions, unresolved matters, omissions, and anticipated losses are visible. - -If the missing material admits materially different process structures, formulate the smallest resolving question before constructing. Ask it only during interactive elicitation; in construct-only execution, return it as a blocking re-entry question. If the person has stopped, deliver the partial workpiece instead of opening a new topic. - -## Tool-schema acceptance checks - -- Every intended construction call was accepted or its rejection remains explicitly unresolved. -- The latest inspected definition contains each accepted place, transition, type, parameter, and connection under the identifier returned or supplied. -- Every referenced endpoint exists in the inspected definition. -- Arc weights or multiplicities are positive and conform to the mounted schema. -- No later step depends on a rejected or absent change. - -Re-inspect after dependent stages and once at the end. Record rejected calls and repairs. Describe this result as **tool-schema accepted**, not valid, runnable, or simulated. - -## Agent-reviewed structural correspondence - -Compare the latest inspected definition with the authoritative workpiece claims. - -- The definition contains at least one meaningful place and transition corresponding to the process account. -- It contains a candidate structural path from a represented initial or admitted condition toward an outcome. This does not establish that the path can fire. -- Visible branches, joins, loops, and recovery structures correspond to the workpiece's stated ordering and conditions. -- For each enumerated resource-holding path, the intended acquisition and return structures are present. This does not establish conservation over every execution. -- Consumed inputs lack an unintended return structure; reserved inputs have an intended return structure; read-only information remains visibly available by the chosen representation. -- Mutually exclusive outcomes or modes have apparently exclusive guards or structure. This does not establish that they can never overlap at runtime. -- Direction-dependent mode changes retain distinct structural losses where the workpiece requires them. -- Continuous dynamics have a recorded quantity, consequential threshold or effect, and workpiece support. -- Required parameters and initial populations are represented or explicitly named as external inputs. -- Waiting is explained by recorded surrounding conditions rather than an unsupported queue object. - -Record discrepancies and the agent judgment used to resolve or preserve them. Describe a passing result as **structurally reviewed against the workpiece**. - -## Behavioral evidence - -Only report observations produced by an actual execution or named stronger analysis. - -- Record the exact definition revision, scenario, initial state, parameters, duration or stopping condition, and analysis method. -- State which process path or property was exercised. -- For a simulation, report only observed progress, resource balances, mode states, outputs, and failures from the runs performed. -- For state-space or invariant analysis, report the explored scope, assumptions, and any unexamined behaviors. -- Relate each observation back to the workpiece objective it bears on. -- Preserve failures and counterexamples; do not summarize them as a pass because another run succeeded. - -No behavioral tool or result means no behavioral claim. - -## Fidelity and uncertainty - -- Every load-bearing net choice traces to an authoritative workpiece claim or a named construction inference, approximation, or default. -- No hedge has been hardened solely to satisfy a schema. -- No conflict has been averaged and no contextual value has been made universal without an accepted simplification. -- Assumptions state why they were introduced, what they affect, and how they could be checked. -- Material retained only in the workpiece is named as a target or tooling loss rather than omitted silently. -- The delivery distinguishes accepted structure, agent review, observed behavior, and universal guarantees. - -## Revision checks - -When revising an existing workpiece or analyzing a requested net change: - -- the changed or disputed workpiece material is explicit; -- the prior and current account are distinguishable as correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence; -- the desired net delta follows from changed workpiece meaning; -- unsupported update or removal operations are reported rather than imitated with competing additive structure; -- any applied additive net changes preserve the intended existing structure at the level actually inspected; -- assumptions and losses displaced or introduced by the revision are reported; -- the delivery distinguishes what changed from what was only inspected and says what the model can now support that it could not support before, or vice versa. - -## Delivery - -Always deliver the current recoverable workpiece. Deliver a net only if construction occurred through available tools and the resulting definition was inspected. - -State plainly: - -- what question or decision the result is intended to support; -- whether the workpiece is sufficient for that purpose or partial with named gaps; -- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or tool-schema accepted; -- whether an agent-reviewed structural comparison occurred and what discrepancies remain; -- whether behavior was untested, observed in named simulations, or established to the stated scope by stronger analysis; -- what the agent inferred, approximated, defaulted, simplified, or omitted; -- what remains unknown, unasked, declined, deferred, conflicting, or unsupported; -- what the target formalism or current tooling could not represent; -- what smallest next evidence would change the result. - -Do not collapse these levels into “validated,” “correct,” “runnable,” or “simulatable” without naming the evidence that supports that exact claim. Do not convert the delivery descriptions into a closed completion algebra. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md deleted file mode 100644 index f5b27c5bd13..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,106 +0,0 @@ -# Process-Model Workpiece Template - -This domain-primary workpiece is maintained during elicitation and revision and consumed during construction. It is structurally organized but not a closed semantic claim system. Follow the person's thread during the conversation; do not read these headings aloud as a questionnaire. - -## Locality rule - -Every operational claim has one authoritative home under the relevant purpose or operational concern. Keep exact expert wording, normalized interpretation, agent inference, uncertainty, assumptions, corrections, conflicts, and contextual variation beside that claim when those distinctions matter. Do not repeat the claim in a centralized evidence section or ledger. - -Labels such as **Expert evidence**, **Working account**, **Agent inference**, **Assumed**, **Unknown**, **Not yet asked**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, **Conflict**, **Correction**, **Contextual variation**, **Omitted**, and **Loss** are optional annotations, not mandatory fields or a closed type system. An assumption states why it was introduced and how it could be checked. A correction identifies the account it replaces without leaving both active. Contextual coexistence keeps each account beside the condition selecting it. - -Use the cross-cutting issue ledger only when an unresolved matter affects several authoritative claims or needs a later return path. Ledger entries reference those claims; they do not summarize them again. - -Whenever this workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit the full latest document again before a construction handoff and before workpiece-only delivery. - -```markdown -# Process-Model Workpiece - -## Purpose and posture - -### What the model must answer, compare, or support - -### Who will use it and how - -### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation - -### Available time and assumption appetite - -### What the result must not claim - -## Operational account - -These are filing homes, not interview order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose; keep a consequential omission visible. Place each operational claim once and attach evidence or epistemic annotations at that location when needed. - -### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds - -### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state - -### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources - -### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use - -For each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; put its place in the ordered case only in the process-spine section below. - -### Case and process spine: flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery - -Give the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary. Begin with a concrete case: what admits it to the process, what flows, which named activities occur and in what order, what decisions or conditions change the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the case, and what outcome or handoff ends it. Reference activity and resource entries instead of restating their local details. - -#### Primary case: - -##### Trigger or admission - -##### Ordered account and references - -##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes - -##### Objective dependencies - -#### Additional or contrasting case: - -Add only when a different case exposes structure the primary case does not. - -### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior - -### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes - -### Validation evidence and data sources - -## Cross-cutting issue ledger - -Use only for an unresolved matter that affects several concerns or needs later re-entry. In one compact entry, reference the authoritative claim locations, state what remains unresolved and what it prevents, and name the evidence or event that would re-enter it. Do not copy the affected claims here. - -- **** — affects: ; unresolved: ; consequence: ; re-enter when: . - -## Construction notes - -Open this section when construction begins; do not use it to script ordinary elicitation. Reference authoritative workpiece claims rather than reproducing them. - -### Candidate target structures - -### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults - -### Questions reopened by construction - -### Target-representation losses - -## Delivery status - -Summarize status by reference to the authoritative account and issue ledger; do not create a second model summary. - -### What this workpiece currently supports - -### Consequential gaps - -### Net status - -State whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or tool-schema accepted; whether the inspected definition was structurally reviewed against the workpiece; and whether behavior was untested, observed in named simulations, or established to a stated scope by stronger analysis. Do not infer a higher level from a lower one. -``` - -## Maintenance guidance - -- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions. -- Update the claim at its authoritative location when understanding changes; do not append a competing summary elsewhere. -- Keep evidence and epistemic treatment local even when a cross-cutting issue references the claim. -- Update the authoritative case-and-process-spine section when ordering or case behavior changes; reference local activity and resource claims rather than repeating them. -- Empty sections may be removed when irrelevant. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, or **Omitted** only when that state itself matters to later work. -- Construction consumes this workpiece. If construction needs transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that point. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md index 5bc7ef16ece..eeddd1895a0 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md @@ -68,4 +68,4 @@ An explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the be ## Resource discipline -Read resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions. +Read resources directly from this skill's advertised resource list. When calling `read_skill_resource`, pass the exact `/.flue/packaged-skills/...` URI advertised after `→`; the relative resource name is only a label and will fail. Do not treat Markdown links as includes, follow references recursively, or read construction material merely to frame ordinary interview questions. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/test/sdcpn-modelling-skill.test.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/test/sdcpn-modelling-skill.test.ts index 976b9f3e241..dfe08356f6b 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/test/sdcpn-modelling-skill.test.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/test/sdcpn-modelling-skill.test.ts @@ -39,6 +39,9 @@ describe("the authored sdcpn-modelling skill", () => { expect(instructions).toMatch( /If it already answers\s+the question, answer without reading the elicitation references or interviewing/u, ); + expect(instructions).toContain( + "pass the exact `/.flue/packaged-skills/...` URI advertised after `→`", + ); expect(profile).not.toMatch(/Vestera|truck fleet|semiconductor/iu); expect(workpiece).toContain( "Every operational claim has one authoritative home", From 2d09a346386e660a4815fadac29e6d5acb84238e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 14:47:08 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 042/101] ignore playwright cli outputs Signed-off-by: Lu Nelson --- .gitignore | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 34a1652ba8c..cafbcd086a6 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ bower_components .lock-wscript # Tests +**/.playwright-cli/ **/playwright-report/ **/test-results/ tests/**/.auth/ From da9f926ebbb7d62b7eae439f983931635766e694 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 15:34:57 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 043/101] Reopen and repair Brunch Mission 4 evidence --- apps/brunch-agent/package.json | 7 +- .../src/evaluations/runbook/artifacts.ts | 92 +- .../evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts | 434 -------- .../runbook/prospective-runbook-v2-run.ts | 838 --------------- .../test/architecture-score-report.test.ts | 88 ++ .../architecture/boundaries.integration.ts | 10 +- .../test/prospective-runbook-v3.test.ts | 100 -- ...test.ts => prospective-runbook-v4.test.ts} | 75 +- .../test/runbook-artifacts.test.ts | 162 +++ .../test/runbook-elicitation.test.ts | 226 ----- apps/brunch-agent/test/turn-timing.test.ts | 233 ----- ...l-workpiece-architecture.md => MISSION.md} | 22 +- libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md | 18 +- libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/README.md | 7 +- .../mission-4-owner-gates-2026-09-02.md | 13 + .../EVALUATION.md | 0 .../README.md | 11 + .../SOURCE-MAP.md | 0 .../stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md | 0 .../stage-2-owner-led-paper-walkthrough.md | 0 .../campaign-adjudication.md | 73 +- .../mission-5-handoff.md | 54 - .../product-witness.md | 51 +- .../condition-5-turn-latency.md | 2 +- .../implementations/mission-4-close.md | 84 -- .../docs/mission-archive/README.md | 1 - .../mission-drafts/5-capture-backed-review.md | 8 +- .../mission-drafts/6-traceable-projection.md | 4 +- .../7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md | 2 +- .../mission-drafts/9-optimisation-handoff.md | 2 +- .../docs/mission-drafts/README.md | 2 +- .../brunch-agent/evaluations/README.md | 4 +- .../ARCHIVE.md | 11 + .../ARCHIVE.md | 11 + .../ARCHIVE.md | 11 + .../instrument}/APPEND_SYSTEM.md | 0 .../gherkin-specification/SKILL.md | 0 .../gherkin-authoring-and-checks.md | 0 .../gherkin-elicitation.md | 0 .../workpiece-template.md | 0 .../gherkin-shape-c-paper-v1/protocol.md | 9 + .../protocols/legacy-baseline/harness-run.ts | 954 ------------------ .../protocols/legacy-baseline/protocol.md | 5 +- .../protocols/legacy-baseline/run.ts | 636 ------------ .../protocols/legacy-baseline/turn-timing.ts | 162 --- .../mission-4-product-witness-v2/protocol.md | 45 + .../prospective-runbook-v1/ARCHIVE.md | 7 + .../prospective-runbook-v2/ARCHIVE.md | 7 + .../prospective-runbook-v3/ARCHIVE.md | 7 + .../protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/grade.ts | 116 ++- .../prospective-runbook-v4/protocol.md | 88 ++ .../protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/run.ts | 50 +- .../prospective-runbook-v4/score-report.ts | 69 ++ .../packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/README.md | 229 ----- .../plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md | 71 -- .../sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md | 153 --- .../_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md | 119 --- .../five-register-synthesis/core/SYSTEM.md | 21 - .../core/flue.ts.example | 4 - .../core/universal-elicitation.md | 231 ----- .../plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md | 11 - .../sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md | 58 -- .../sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md | 124 --- .../plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md | 219 ---- .../sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts.example | 24 - .../brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md | 2 +- .../core/src/universal-elicitation.md | 4 +- .../test/architecture/baseline-runner.test.ts | 386 ------- .../plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md | 2 +- .../skills/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md | 2 + .../test/sdcpn-modelling-skill.test.ts | 6 + yarn.lock | 1 + 72 files changed, 924 insertions(+), 5554 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts delete mode 100644 apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v2-run.ts create mode 100644 apps/brunch-agent/test/architecture-score-report.test.ts delete mode 100644 apps/brunch-agent/test/prospective-runbook-v3.test.ts rename apps/brunch-agent/test/{prospective-runbook-v2.test.ts => prospective-runbook-v4.test.ts} (86%) delete mode 100644 apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation.test.ts delete mode 100644 apps/brunch-agent/test/turn-timing.test.ts rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/{docs/mission-archive/4-accepted-prompt-skill-workpiece-architecture.md => MISSION.md} (83%) create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/decisions/mission-4-owner-gates-2026-09-02.md rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/{packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis => docs/evidence/evaluations/five-register-paper-comparison-v1}/EVALUATION.md (100%) create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/five-register-paper-comparison-v1/README.md rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/{packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis => docs/evidence/evaluations/five-register-paper-comparison-v1}/SOURCE-MAP.md (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/{packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis => docs/evidence/evaluations/five-register-paper-comparison-v1}/evaluation/stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/{packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis => docs/evidence/evaluations/five-register-paper-comparison-v1}/evaluation/stage-2-owner-led-paper-walkthrough.md (100%) delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/mission-5-handoff.md delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/implementations/mission-4-close.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/ARCHIVE.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/ARCHIVE.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/ARCHIVE.md rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/{packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin => evaluations/protocols/gherkin-shape-c-paper-v1/instrument}/APPEND_SYSTEM.md (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/{packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin => evaluations/protocols/gherkin-shape-c-paper-v1/instrument}/gherkin-specification/SKILL.md (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/{packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin => evaluations/protocols/gherkin-shape-c-paper-v1/instrument}/gherkin-specification/gherkin-authoring-and-checks.md (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/{packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin => evaluations/protocols/gherkin-shape-c-paper-v1/instrument}/gherkin-specification/gherkin-elicitation.md (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/{packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin => evaluations/protocols/gherkin-shape-c-paper-v1/instrument}/gherkin-specification/workpiece-template.md (100%) create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/gherkin-shape-c-paper-v1/protocol.md delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/legacy-baseline/harness-run.ts delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/legacy-baseline/run.ts delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/legacy-baseline/turn-timing.ts create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/mission-4-product-witness-v2/protocol.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v1/ARCHIVE.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v2/ARCHIVE.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v3/ARCHIVE.md rename apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/grade-architecture-v3.ts => libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/grade.ts (60%) create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/protocol.md rename apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v3-run.ts => libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/run.ts (94%) create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/score-report.ts delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/README.md delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/core/SYSTEM.md delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/core/flue.ts.example delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/core/universal-elicitation.md delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts.example delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/baseline-runner.test.ts diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/package.json b/apps/brunch-agent/package.json index 9301f5390d9..301855f7704 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/package.json +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/package.json @@ -12,10 +12,8 @@ "lint:eslint": "oxlint --type-aware --type-check --report-unused-disable-directives-severity=error .", "lint:tsc": "tsgo --noEmit", "petrinaut:dev": "vite dev --config petrinaut-local.vite.config.ts", - "runbook:elicit": "vite build && node --experimental-strip-types src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts", - "runbook:elicit:architecture-v3": "vite build && node --experimental-strip-types src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v3-run.ts", - "runbook:elicit:candidate-v2": "vite build && node --experimental-strip-types src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v2-run.ts", - "runbook:grade:architecture-v3": "node --experimental-strip-types src/evaluations/runbook/grade-architecture-v3.ts", + "runbook:elicit:architecture-v4": "vite build && node --experimental-strip-types ../../libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/run.ts", + "runbook:grade:architecture-v4": "node --experimental-strip-types ../../libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/grade.ts", "runbook:headless": "vite build && node --experimental-strip-types src/evaluations/runbook/construction-run.ts", "test:unit": "vitest run --config vitest.config.ts", "transcript": "node --experimental-strip-types src/diagnostics/transcript-cli.ts" @@ -37,6 +35,7 @@ "valibot": "1.4.2" }, "devDependencies": { + "@anthropic-ai/sdk": "0.74.0", "@earendil-works/pi-ai": "0.83.0", "@flue/vite": "2.0.3", "@types/node": "22.18.13", diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/artifacts.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/artifacts.ts index b10b65bc6e8..1698c156c4b 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/artifacts.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/artifacts.ts @@ -89,7 +89,10 @@ export interface OrdinaryElicitationViolation { | "capture-tool-use" | "construction-resource-read" | "construction-tool-use" + | "late-required-resource" + | "missing-required-resource" | "missing-workpiece" + | "multiple-questions" | "unexpected-resource-read" | "unexpected-tool-use"; readonly detail: string; @@ -120,6 +123,61 @@ export const ordinaryElicitationViolationsFrom = ( options: { readonly hasWorkpiece: boolean }, ): readonly OrdinaryElicitationViolation[] => { const violations: OrdinaryElicitationViolation[] = []; + const successfulResourcePositions = new Map(); + let firstQuestionPosition: number | undefined; + let firstWorkpiecePosition: number | undefined; + let position = 0; + + for (const message of snapshot.messages) { + if (message.purpose === "assistant") { + const questionCount = message.parts.reduce((count, part) => { + if (part.type !== "text") return count; + const interactiveText = part.text.replace( + /```runbook-ir\s*\n[\s\S]*?```/gu, + "", + ); + return count + (interactiveText.match(/\?/gu)?.length ?? 0); + }, 0); + if (questionCount > 1) { + violations.push({ + code: "multiple-questions", + detail: `${message.id}: ${questionCount} question marks`, + }); + } + } + for (const part of message.parts) { + position += 1; + if (message.purpose !== "assistant") continue; + if (part.type === "text") { + if (firstQuestionPosition === undefined && part.text.includes("?")) { + firstQuestionPosition = position; + } + if ( + firstWorkpiecePosition === undefined && + part.text.includes(`\`\`\`${RUNBOOK_IR_FENCE}`) + ) { + firstWorkpiecePosition = position; + } + continue; + } + if ( + part.type !== "dynamic-tool" || + part.toolName !== "read_skill_resource" || + part.state !== "output-available" || + typeof part.input !== "object" || + part.input === null || + !("path" in part.input) || + typeof part.input.path !== "string" + ) { + continue; + } + const resourceName = basename(part.input.path); + if (!successfulResourcePositions.has(resourceName)) { + successfulResourcePositions.set(resourceName, position); + } + } + } + for (const toolName of interviewerToolNamesFrom(snapshot)) { if (ORDINARY_TOOL_NAMES.has(toolName)) continue; violations.push({ @@ -141,7 +199,39 @@ export const ordinaryElicitationViolationsFrom = ( detail: path, }); } - if (!options.hasWorkpiece) { + + const requireResourceBefore = ( + resourceName: string, + boundary: number | undefined, + boundaryDescription: string, + ): void => { + const resourcePosition = successfulResourcePositions.get(resourceName); + if (resourcePosition === undefined) { + violations.push({ + code: "missing-required-resource", + detail: resourceName, + }); + } else if (boundary !== undefined && resourcePosition > boundary) { + violations.push({ + code: "late-required-resource", + detail: `${resourceName}: after ${boundaryDescription}`, + }); + } + }; + + requireResourceBefore( + "universal-elicitation.md", + firstQuestionPosition, + "first question", + ); + requireResourceBefore("profile.md", firstQuestionPosition, "first question"); + if (options.hasWorkpiece) { + requireResourceBefore( + "workpiece.md", + firstWorkpiecePosition, + "first workpiece", + ); + } else { violations.push({ code: "missing-workpiece", detail: "No recoverable runbook-ir workpiece was emitted.", diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts deleted file mode 100644 index 5ebd9960926..00000000000 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts +++ /dev/null @@ -1,434 +0,0 @@ -/** - * Prospective elicitation-to-IR drive. The production ChatAgent interviews a - * second model, then emits a Markdown runbook IR without entering construction. - * - * Build first, then run: - * yarn exec turbo run build --filter @apps/brunch-agent - * yarn workspace @apps/brunch-agent runbook:elicit - */ - -import { execFile } from "node:child_process"; -import { createHash, randomUUID } from "node:crypto"; -import { mkdir, readFile, rm, writeFile } from "node:fs/promises"; -import { tmpdir } from "node:os"; -import { basename, join } from "node:path"; -import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url"; -import { promisify } from "node:util"; - -import { observe, setProvider } from "@flue/runtime"; -import { createFlueClient } from "@flue/sdk"; - -import { - agentOwnershipHeaders, - flueConversationIdFrom, -} from "../../conversation/identity.ts"; -import { formatFlueTranscript } from "../../conversation/transcript.ts"; -import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE } from "../../http/routes.ts"; -import { - interviewerToolNamesFrom, - recoverRunbookIr, - skillResourcePathsFrom, -} from "./artifacts.ts"; -import { rejectImmutableBaselineOutput } from "./campaign-integrity.ts"; -import { loadBuiltBrunchApplication } from "./load-built-application.ts"; - -import type Anthropic from "@anthropic-ai/sdk"; -import type { Provider } from "@earendil-works/pi-ai"; -import type { FlueConversationSnapshot } from "@flue/sdk"; - -process.env["BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL"] ??= "claude-sonnet-4-5"; - -const execFileAsync = promisify(execFile); -const repositoryRoot = new URL("../../../../../", import.meta.url); -const repositoryRootPath = fileURLToPath(repositoryRoot); -const evaluationRoot = new URL( - "../../../../../libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/", - import.meta.url, -); -const caseDirectory = new URL("cases/vestera-scheduling/", evaluationRoot); -const immutableBaselineDirectory = fileURLToPath( - new URL( - "../../../../../libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/", - import.meta.url, - ), -); - -const expertModel = - process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_EXPERT_MODEL"] ?? "claude-sonnet-4-5"; -const hardStop = Number(process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_HARD_STOP"] ?? "8"); -const latencyStopMs = Number( - process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_LATENCY_STOP_MS"] ?? "180000", -); -const outputDirectory = await rejectImmutableBaselineOutput( - process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_OUTPUT_DIR"] ?? immutableBaselineDirectory, - immutableBaselineDirectory, -); -const expertClientModule = process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ANTHROPIC_MODULE"]; -const interviewerProviderModule = - process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_INTERVIEWER_PROVIDER_MODULE"]; -const allowDirtyInstrument = - process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ALLOW_DIRTY_INSTRUMENT"] === "1"; -const apiKey = process.env["ANTHROPIC_API_KEY"]; - -if (!Number.isSafeInteger(hardStop) || hardStop < 1) { - throw new Error("BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_HARD_STOP must be a positive integer"); -} -if (!Number.isFinite(latencyStopMs) || latencyStopMs <= 0) { - throw new Error("BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_LATENCY_STOP_MS must be positive"); -} -if (!apiKey && !expertClientModule) { - throw new Error( - "ANTHROPIC_API_KEY is required unless BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ANTHROPIC_MODULE is set", - ); -} -const instrumentFiles = [ - "apps/brunch-agent/package.json", - "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", - "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/ping.ts", - "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/artifacts.ts", - "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/campaign-integrity.ts", - "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/package.json", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/universal-elicitation.md", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/package.json", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/opening-message.md", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/situation-pack.md", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/vestera-scheduling/truth-ledger-v1-prospective.yaml", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/ir-quality-ruler-v1.md", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1/omniscient-grader.md", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1/cold-ir-reviewer.md", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v1/protocol.md", -] as const; - -const sha256 = (content: string | Buffer): string => - createHash("sha256").update(content).digest("hex"); - -const hashedInstrumentFiles = await Promise.all( - instrumentFiles.map(async (path) => ({ - path, - hash: sha256(await readFile(new URL(path, repositoryRoot))), - })), -); -const fileSha256: Record = {}; -for (const file of hashedInstrumentFiles) { - fileSha256[file.path] = file.hash; -} -const { stdout: commitOutput } = await execFileAsync( - "git", - ["rev-parse", "HEAD"], - { cwd: repositoryRootPath }, -); -const sourceCommit = commitOutput.trim(); -const { stdout: statusOutput } = await execFileAsync( - "git", - ["status", "--short", "--", ...instrumentFiles], - { cwd: repositoryRootPath }, -); -const instrumentStatus = statusOutput.trim(); -if (instrumentStatus.length > 0 && !allowDirtyInstrument) { - throw new Error( - `Prospective instrument files are not clean:\n${instrumentStatus}\n` + - "Commit them before a paid run, or set BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ALLOW_DIRTY_INSTRUMENT=1 only for a hermetic test.", - ); -} - -const openingRaw = await readFile( - new URL("opening-message.md", caseDirectory), - "utf8", -); -const openingSeparator = openingRaw.indexOf("\n---\n"); -const openingMessage = ( - openingSeparator === -1 ? openingRaw : openingRaw.slice(openingSeparator + 5) -).trim(); -const situationPack = await readFile( - new URL("situation-pack.md", caseDirectory), - "utf8", -); -const finalizationMessage = [ - "[Evaluation stop instruction; not expert evidence]", - "The interview turn budget is exhausted.", - "Emit the full current Markdown runbook IR in one `runbook-ir` fenced block.", - "Do not ask another question, construct the Petri net, or read construction resources.", - "Preserve every unresolved unknown, assumption, conflict, omission, and loss.", -].join(" "); - -interface ExpertMessage { - readonly role: "user" | "assistant"; - readonly content: string; -} - -interface ExpertClient { - messages: { - create(request: Anthropic.MessageCreateParamsNonStreaming): Promise<{ - readonly content: readonly { - readonly type: string; - readonly text?: string; - }[]; - readonly model?: string; - readonly stop_reason?: string | null; - readonly usage?: Partial; - }>; - }; -} - -const defaultExportFrom = async (specifier: string): Promise => { - const loaded: unknown = await import(specifier); - if (typeof loaded !== "object" || loaded === null || !("default" in loaded)) { - throw new Error(`${specifier} has no default export`); - } - return loaded.default as Value; -}; - -if (interviewerProviderModule) { - setProvider(await defaultExportFrom(interviewerProviderModule)); -} - -const AnthropicClient = (await import("@anthropic-ai/sdk")).default; -const expertClient: ExpertClient = expertClientModule - ? await defaultExportFrom(expertClientModule) - : (new AnthropicClient({ - apiKey, - maxRetries: 5, - timeout: 30 * 60 * 1000, - }) as ExpertClient); - -const expertMessages: ExpertMessage[] = []; -const expertUsage = { - calls: 0, - inputTokens: 0, - outputTokens: 0, - cacheReadTokens: 0, - cacheWriteTokens: 0, -}; - -const errorMessageFrom = (error: unknown): string => - error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error); - -const askExpert = async (interviewerText: string): Promise => { - expertMessages.push({ role: "user", content: interviewerText }); - const response = await expertClient.messages.create({ - model: expertModel, - max_tokens: 1500, - thinking: { type: "disabled" }, - system: situationPack, - messages: expertMessages, - }); - expertUsage.calls += 1; - expertUsage.inputTokens += response.usage?.input_tokens ?? 0; - expertUsage.outputTokens += response.usage?.output_tokens ?? 0; - expertUsage.cacheReadTokens += response.usage?.cache_read_input_tokens ?? 0; - expertUsage.cacheWriteTokens += - response.usage?.cache_creation_input_tokens ?? 0; - const text = response.content - .filter( - (block): block is { readonly type: "text"; readonly text: string } => - block.type === "text" && typeof block.text === "string", - ) - .map((block) => block.text) - .join("\n") - .trim(); - if (text.length === 0) - throw new Error("The simulated expert returned no text"); - expertMessages.push({ role: "assistant", content: text }); - return text; -}; - -const latestAssistantText = (snapshot: FlueConversationSnapshot): string => { - for (const message of snapshot.messages.toReversed()) { - if (message.purpose !== "assistant") continue; - const text = message.parts - .filter((part) => part.type === "text") - .map((part) => part.text) - .join("\n") - .trim(); - if (text.length > 0) return text; - } - return ""; -}; - -type ModelCall = { - readonly durationMs: number; - readonly inputTokens: number; - readonly outputTokens: number; - readonly totalTokens: number; - readonly cost: number; -}; -const modelCalls: ModelCall[] = []; -const stopObserving = observe((event) => { - if (event.type !== "turn") return; - const usage = event.response.usage; - modelCalls.push({ - durationMs: event.durationMs, - inputTokens: usage?.input ?? 0, - outputTokens: usage?.output ?? 0, - totalTokens: usage?.totalTokens ?? 0, - cost: usage?.cost.total ?? 0, - }); -}); - -const startedAt = new Date().toISOString(); -const runId = `runbook-elicitation-${startedAt.replaceAll( - /[:.]/gu, - "-", -)}-${randomUUID().slice(0, 8)}`; -const identity = { - principalKey: "principal-runbook-elicitation", - conversationId: runId, -}; -const instanceId = flueConversationIdFrom(identity); -const databasePath = join(tmpdir(), `${runId}.db`); -process.env["BRUNCH_DEV_DB_PATH"] = databasePath; - -await mkdir(outputDirectory, { recursive: true }); -const application = await loadBuiltBrunchApplication(); - -try { - const client = createFlueClient({ - url: `http://brunch.local/agents/${CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE}/${instanceId}`, - fetch: (input, init) => - Promise.resolve( - application.fetch( - input instanceof Request ? input : new Request(input, init), - ), - ).then((response) => response), - headers: agentOwnershipHeaders(identity), - }); - - const logicalTurnDurationsMs: number[] = []; - const dispatch = async (body: string): Promise => { - const firstCallIndex = modelCalls.length; - const admission = await client.send({ message: { kind: "user", body } }); - await client.wait(admission); - logicalTurnDurationsMs.push( - modelCalls - .slice(firstCallIndex) - .reduce((total, call) => total + call.durationMs, 0), - ); - }; - - let interviewTurns = 1; - let stopReason = "hard-stop"; - let failure: string | undefined; - await dispatch(openingMessage); - - while (interviewTurns < hardStop) { - const previousDuration = logicalTurnDurationsMs.at(-1) ?? 0; - if (previousDuration > latencyStopMs) { - stopReason = "latency-stop"; - break; - } - // oxlint-disable-next-line eslint/no-await-in-loop -- interview turns are causally sequential. - const snapshot = await client.history(); - const interviewerText = latestAssistantText(snapshot); - if (interviewerText.length === 0) { - stopReason = "empty-interviewer"; - break; - } - let expertReply: string; - try { - // oxlint-disable-next-line eslint/no-await-in-loop -- the expert must answer this settled interviewer turn. - expertReply = await askExpert(interviewerText); - } catch (error) { - stopReason = "expert-error"; - failure = errorMessageFrom(error); - break; - } - // oxlint-disable-next-line eslint/no-await-in-loop -- the next interviewer turn depends on the expert reply. - await dispatch(expertReply); - interviewTurns += 1; - } - - await dispatch(finalizationMessage); - const snapshot = await client.history(); - const ir = recoverRunbookIr(snapshot); - const toolNames = interviewerToolNamesFrom(snapshot); - const resourcePaths = skillResourcePathsFrom(snapshot); - const resourceFilesRead = [ - ...new Set(resourcePaths.map((path) => basename(path))), - ]; - const transcript = formatFlueTranscript(snapshot); - const builtArtifact = await readFile( - new URL("../../../dist/app.mjs", import.meta.url), - ); - const record = { - runId, - startedAt, - interviewerModel: process.env["BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL"], - expertModel, - hardStop, - latencyStopMs, - interviewTurns, - stopReason, - finalizationMessage, - logicalTurnDurationsMs, - modelCalls, - expertUsage, - toolNames, - resourcePaths, - ir, - failure, - wroteCaptureStore: false, - instrument: { - sourceCommit, - instrumentStatus, - fileSha256, - builtArtifactSha256: sha256(builtArtifact), - }, - transcript, - }; - const artifactBase = join(outputDirectory, runId); - await writeFile( - `${artifactBase}.json`, - `${JSON.stringify(record, null, 2)}\n`, - ); - await writeFile( - `${artifactBase}.md`, - [ - `# Prospective runbook elicitation — ${runId}`, - "", - `- Source commit: \`${sourceCommit}\``, - `- Interviewer: \`${record.interviewerModel}\``, - `- Simulated expert: \`${expertModel}\``, - `- Interview turns: ${interviewTurns} (hard stop ${hardStop})`, - `- Stop reason before final IR request: \`${stopReason}\``, - `- Recoverable IR: ${ir === undefined ? "no" : "yes"}`, - "- Final user message is an evaluation stop instruction, not expert evidence.", - "", - transcript, - "", - ].join("\n"), - ); - if (ir !== undefined) { - await writeFile(`${artifactBase}.ir.md`, `${ir}\n`); - } - - process.stdout.write( - `RUNBOOK_ELICITATION_RESULT ${JSON.stringify({ - stopReason, - hasIr: ir !== undefined, - interviewTurns, - toolNames, - resourceFilesRead, - failure, - wroteCaptureStore: false, - artifactBase, - })}\n`, - ); - if (failure !== undefined || ir === undefined) process.exitCode = 1; -} finally { - stopObserving(); - await application.stop(); - await rm(databasePath, { force: true }); -} diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v2-run.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v2-run.ts deleted file mode 100644 index 4b6b167a1d9..00000000000 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v2-run.ts +++ /dev/null @@ -1,838 +0,0 @@ -/** - * Candidate v2 prospective elicitation campaign. - * - * This is intentionally separate from the immutable Mission 3 v1 runner. - * Build first, then run one explicitly numbered replication: - * BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_REPLICATION=1 \ - * yarn workspace @apps/brunch-agent runbook:elicit:candidate-v2 - */ - -import { execFile } from "node:child_process"; -import { randomUUID } from "node:crypto"; -import { mkdir, readFile, readdir, rm, writeFile } from "node:fs/promises"; -import { tmpdir } from "node:os"; -import { basename, join } from "node:path"; -import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url"; -import { promisify } from "node:util"; - -import { observe, setProvider } from "@flue/runtime"; -import { createFlueClient } from "@flue/sdk"; - -import { - agentOwnershipHeaders, - flueConversationIdFrom, -} from "../../conversation/identity.ts"; -import { formatFlueTranscript } from "../../conversation/transcript.ts"; -import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE } from "../../http/routes.ts"; -import { - interviewerToolNamesFrom, - ordinaryElicitationViolationsFrom, - recoverRunbookWorkpiece, - skillResourcePathsFrom, -} from "./artifacts.ts"; -import { - assertApprovedHermeticModelModules, - builtServerArtifactManifest, - canonicalPath, - rejectImmutableBaselineOutput, - sha256, -} from "./campaign-integrity.ts"; -import { - type BuiltBrunchApplication, - loadBuiltBrunchApplication, -} from "./load-built-application.ts"; - -import type Anthropic from "@anthropic-ai/sdk"; -import type { Provider } from "@earendil-works/pi-ai"; -import type { FlueConversationSnapshot } from "@flue/sdk"; - -const PROTOCOL_ID = "prospective-runbook-v2"; -const OUTPUT_NAMESPACE_ID = "vestera-prospective-candidate-v2"; -const FROZEN_MODEL = "claude-sonnet-4-5"; -const FROZEN_HARD_STOP = 8; -const FROZEN_LATENCY_STOP_MS = 180_000; -const FROZEN_REPLICATIONS = 3; - -process.env["BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL"] ??= FROZEN_MODEL; - -const execFileAsync = promisify(execFile); -const repositoryRoot = new URL("../../../../../", import.meta.url); -const repositoryRootPath = fileURLToPath(repositoryRoot); -const evaluationRoot = new URL( - "../../../../../libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/", - import.meta.url, -); -const caseDirectory = new URL("cases/vestera-scheduling/", evaluationRoot); -const candidateOutputDirectory = fileURLToPath( - new URL( - "../../../../../libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-candidate-v2/", - import.meta.url, - ), -); -const immutableBaselineDirectory = fileURLToPath( - new URL( - "../../../../../libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/", - import.meta.url, - ), -); - -const interviewerModel = process.env["BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL"]; -const expertModel = process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_EXPERT_MODEL"] ?? FROZEN_MODEL; -const hardStop = Number( - process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_HARD_STOP"] ?? `${FROZEN_HARD_STOP}`, -); -const latencyStopMs = Number( - process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_LATENCY_STOP_MS"] ?? `${FROZEN_LATENCY_STOP_MS}`, -); -const replication = Number(process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_REPLICATION"] ?? "0"); -const outputDirectory = await rejectImmutableBaselineOutput( - process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_OUTPUT_DIR"] ?? candidateOutputDirectory, - immutableBaselineDirectory, -); -const canonicalCandidateOutputDirectory = await canonicalPath( - candidateOutputDirectory, -); -const expertClientModule = process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ANTHROPIC_MODULE"]; -const interviewerProviderModule = - process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_INTERVIEWER_PROVIDER_MODULE"]; -const allowDirtyInstrument = - process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ALLOW_DIRTY_INSTRUMENT"] === "1"; -const apiKey = process.env["ANTHROPIC_API_KEY"]; - -if (!Number.isSafeInteger(hardStop) || hardStop < 1) { - throw new Error("BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_HARD_STOP must be a positive integer"); -} -if (!Number.isFinite(latencyStopMs) || latencyStopMs <= 0) { - throw new Error("BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_LATENCY_STOP_MS must be positive"); -} -if ( - !Number.isSafeInteger(replication) || - replication < 1 || - replication > FROZEN_REPLICATIONS -) { - throw new Error( - `BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_REPLICATION must be one of 1, 2, or ${FROZEN_REPLICATIONS}`, - ); -} - -const hasExpertOverride = expertClientModule !== undefined; -const hasInterviewerOverride = interviewerProviderModule !== undefined; -if (hasExpertOverride !== hasInterviewerOverride) { - throw new Error( - "Hermetic runs must set both test-only model module overrides; paid runs must set neither.", - ); -} -const isHermeticRun = hasExpertOverride && hasInterviewerOverride; -const usesFrozenConfiguration = - interviewerModel === FROZEN_MODEL && - expertModel === FROZEN_MODEL && - hardStop === FROZEN_HARD_STOP && - latencyStopMs === FROZEN_LATENCY_STOP_MS; - -if (isHermeticRun) { - await assertApprovedHermeticModelModules(repositoryRootPath, { - expert: expertClientModule, - interviewer: interviewerProviderModule, - }); - if (outputDirectory === canonicalCandidateOutputDirectory) { - throw new Error( - "Hermetic runs cannot write to vestera-prospective-candidate-v2.", - ); - } - if (apiKey) { - throw new Error("Hermetic runs must not receive ANTHROPIC_API_KEY."); - } -} else { - if (!apiKey) { - throw new Error("ANTHROPIC_API_KEY is required for a paid candidate run."); - } - if (outputDirectory !== canonicalCandidateOutputDirectory) { - throw new Error( - "Paid candidate runs must write to vestera-prospective-candidate-v2.", - ); - } - if (!usesFrozenConfiguration) { - throw new Error( - "Paid candidate runs require the frozen prospective-runbook-v2 model, turn, and latency configuration.", - ); - } - if (allowDirtyInstrument) { - throw new Error( - "Paid candidate runs cannot use BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ALLOW_DIRTY_INSTRUMENT.", - ); - } -} - -const instrumentFiles = [ - "yarn.lock", - "apps/brunch-agent/package.json", - "apps/brunch-agent/vite.config.ts", - "apps/brunch-agent/src/app.ts", - "apps/brunch-agent/src/db.ts", - "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", - "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/tools/ping.ts", - "apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/identity.ts", - "apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/transcript.ts", - "apps/brunch-agent/src/http/routes.ts", - "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/artifacts.ts", - "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/campaign-integrity.ts", - "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/load-built-application.ts", - "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v2-run.ts", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/package.json", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/universal-elicitation.md", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/package.json", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/flue.ts", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/petrinaut-construction.ts", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/tools/read-petrinaut-doc.ts", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/opening-message.md", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/situation-pack.md", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/vestera-scheduling/truth-ledger-v1-prospective.yaml", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/ir-quality-ruler-v1.md", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1/omniscient-grader.md", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1/cold-ir-reviewer.md", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v2/protocol.md", -] as const; - -const hashedInstrumentFiles = await Promise.all( - instrumentFiles.map(async (path) => ({ - path, - hash: sha256(await readFile(new URL(path, repositoryRoot))), - })), -); -const fileSha256: Record = {}; -for (const file of hashedInstrumentFiles) { - fileSha256[file.path] = file.hash; -} - -const { stdout: commitOutput } = await execFileAsync( - "git", - ["rev-parse", "HEAD"], - { cwd: repositoryRootPath }, -); -const sourceCommit = commitOutput.trim(); -const { stdout: statusOutput } = await execFileAsync( - "git", - ["status", "--short", "--", ...instrumentFiles], - { cwd: repositoryRootPath }, -); -const instrumentStatus = statusOutput.trim(); -if (instrumentStatus.length > 0 && !allowDirtyInstrument) { - throw new Error( - `Candidate instrument files are not clean:\n${instrumentStatus}\n` + - "Commit them before a paid run. The dirty escape hatch is hermetic-test-only.", - ); -} -if (allowDirtyInstrument && !isHermeticRun) { - throw new Error( - "BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ALLOW_DIRTY_INSTRUMENT is restricted to hermetic runs.", - ); -} - -const builtArtifactManifest = - await builtServerArtifactManifest(repositoryRootPath); -const builtArtifactManifestSha256 = sha256( - JSON.stringify(builtArtifactManifest), -); -const campaignFingerprint = sha256( - JSON.stringify({ - protocolId: PROTOCOL_ID, - outputNamespaceId: OUTPUT_NAMESPACE_ID, - interviewerModel, - expertModel, - hardStop, - latencyStopMs, - fileSha256, - builtArtifactManifest, - }), -); - -interface ExistingCandidateRecord { - readonly protocolId?: unknown; - readonly outputNamespaceId?: unknown; - readonly replication?: unknown; - readonly campaignFingerprint?: unknown; -} - -if (!isHermeticRun) { - let existingNames: string[] = []; - try { - existingNames = await readdir(outputDirectory); - } catch (error) { - if ( - !(error instanceof Error) || - !("code" in error) || - error.code !== "ENOENT" - ) { - throw error; - } - } - const existingRecords = await Promise.all( - existingNames - .filter((entry) => entry.endsWith(".json")) - .map(async (name) => ({ - name, - record: JSON.parse( - await readFile(join(outputDirectory, name), "utf8"), - ) as ExistingCandidateRecord, - })), - ); - for (const { name, record: existing } of existingRecords) { - if ( - existing.protocolId !== PROTOCOL_ID || - existing.outputNamespaceId !== OUTPUT_NAMESPACE_ID - ) { - throw new Error( - `Candidate output namespace contains a foreign JSON artifact: ${name}`, - ); - } - if (existing.campaignFingerprint !== campaignFingerprint) { - throw new Error( - `Candidate artifact ${name} used a different frozen instrument or configuration.`, - ); - } - if (existing.replication === replication) { - throw new Error( - `Candidate replication ${replication} already has an immutable artifact: ${name}`, - ); - } - } -} - -const openingRaw = await readFile( - new URL("opening-message.md", caseDirectory), - "utf8", -); -const openingSeparator = openingRaw.indexOf("\n---\n"); -const openingMessage = ( - openingSeparator === -1 ? openingRaw : openingRaw.slice(openingSeparator + 5) -).trim(); -const situationPack = await readFile( - new URL("situation-pack.md", caseDirectory), - "utf8", -); -const finalizationMessage = [ - "[Evaluation stop instruction; not expert evidence]", - "The interview turn budget is exhausted.", - "Emit the full current Markdown runbook IR in one `runbook-ir` fenced block.", - "Do not ask another question, construct the Petri net, or read construction resources.", - "Preserve every unresolved unknown, not-yet-asked item, declined or deferred item, assumption, conflict, correction, contextual coexistence, omission, and loss.", -].join(" "); - -interface ExpertMessage { - readonly role: "user" | "assistant"; - readonly content: string; -} - -interface ExpertClient { - messages: { - create(request: Anthropic.MessageCreateParamsNonStreaming): Promise<{ - readonly content: readonly { - readonly type: string; - readonly text?: string; - }[]; - readonly model?: string; - readonly stop_reason?: string | null; - readonly usage?: Partial; - }>; - }; -} - -const defaultExportFrom = async (specifier: string): Promise => { - const loaded: unknown = await import(specifier); - if (typeof loaded !== "object" || loaded === null || !("default" in loaded)) { - throw new Error(`${specifier} has no default export`); - } - return loaded.default as Value; -}; - -const latestAssistantText = (snapshot: FlueConversationSnapshot): string => { - for (const message of snapshot.messages.toReversed()) { - if (message.purpose !== "assistant") continue; - const text = message.parts - .filter((part) => part.type === "text") - .map((part) => part.text) - .join("\n") - .trim(); - if (text.length > 0) return text; - } - return ""; -}; - -interface ModelCall { - readonly durationMs: number; - readonly providerId: string; - readonly providerName: string; - readonly api: string; - readonly requestedModel: string; - readonly observedModel: string | null; - readonly observedModelSource: "provider-response" | "unavailable"; - readonly stopReason: string | null; - readonly providerStopReason: string | null; - readonly inputTokens: number; - readonly outputTokens: number; - readonly totalTokens: number; - readonly cost: number; -} - -const unknownFailureMessage = (error: unknown): string => { - if (typeof error === "string") return error; - try { - return JSON.stringify({ error }); - } catch { - return "Unknown non-serializable failure"; - } -}; - -const failureFrom = (error: unknown) => - error instanceof Error - ? { name: error.name, message: error.message, stack: error.stack } - : { name: "UnknownFailure", message: unknownFailureMessage(error) }; - -const startedAt = new Date().toISOString(); -const runId = `${PROTOCOL_ID}-replication-${replication}-${startedAt.replaceAll( - /[:.]/gu, - "-", -)}-${randomUUID().slice(0, 8)}`; -const artifactBase = join(outputDirectory, runId); -const identity = { - principalKey: `principal-${PROTOCOL_ID}`, - conversationId: runId, -}; -const instanceId = flueConversationIdFrom(identity); -const databasePath = join(tmpdir(), `${runId}.db`); -process.env["BRUNCH_DEV_DB_PATH"] = databasePath; -await mkdir(outputDirectory, { recursive: true }); - -const instrument = { - sourceCommit, - instrumentStatus, - fileSha256, - builtArtifactManifest, - builtArtifactManifestSha256, -}; -const campaignConfiguration = { - interviewerModel, - expertModel, - hardStop, - latencyStopMs, -}; -const expertMessages: ExpertMessage[] = []; -const expertCalls: Array<{ - readonly requestedModel: string; - readonly observedModel: string | null; - readonly observedModelSource: "provider-response" | "unavailable"; - readonly stopReason: string | null; -}> = []; -const expertUsage = { - calls: 0, - inputTokens: 0, - outputTokens: 0, - cacheReadTokens: 0, - cacheWriteTokens: 0, -}; -const modelCalls: ModelCall[] = []; -let application: BuiltBrunchApplication | undefined; -let stopObserving: (() => void) | undefined; -let history: (() => Promise) | undefined; - -try { - if (interviewerProviderModule) { - setProvider(await defaultExportFrom(interviewerProviderModule)); - } - - const AnthropicClient = (await import("@anthropic-ai/sdk")).default; - const expertClient: ExpertClient = expertClientModule - ? await defaultExportFrom(expertClientModule) - : (new AnthropicClient({ - apiKey, - maxRetries: 5, - timeout: 30 * 60 * 1000, - }) as ExpertClient); - - const askExpert = async (interviewerText: string): Promise => { - expertMessages.push({ role: "user", content: interviewerText }); - const response = await expertClient.messages.create({ - model: expertModel, - max_tokens: 1500, - thinking: { type: "disabled" }, - system: situationPack, - messages: expertMessages, - }); - expertUsage.calls += 1; - expertUsage.inputTokens += response.usage?.input_tokens ?? 0; - expertUsage.outputTokens += response.usage?.output_tokens ?? 0; - expertUsage.cacheReadTokens += response.usage?.cache_read_input_tokens ?? 0; - expertUsage.cacheWriteTokens += - response.usage?.cache_creation_input_tokens ?? 0; - expertCalls.push({ - requestedModel: expertModel, - observedModel: response.model ?? null, - observedModelSource: - response.model === undefined ? "unavailable" : "provider-response", - stopReason: response.stop_reason ?? null, - }); - const text = response.content - .filter( - (block): block is { readonly type: "text"; readonly text: string } => - block.type === "text" && typeof block.text === "string", - ) - .map((block) => block.text) - .join("\n") - .trim(); - if (text.length === 0) { - throw new Error("The simulated expert returned no text"); - } - expertMessages.push({ role: "assistant", content: text }); - return text; - }; - - stopObserving = observe((event) => { - if (event.type !== "turn") return; - const usage = event.response.usage; - modelCalls.push({ - durationMs: event.durationMs, - providerId: event.request.providerId, - providerName: event.request.providerName, - api: event.request.api, - requestedModel: event.request.requestedModel, - observedModel: event.response.responseModel ?? null, - observedModelSource: - event.response.responseModel === undefined - ? "unavailable" - : "provider-response", - stopReason: event.response.finishReason ?? null, - providerStopReason: event.response.providerFinishReason ?? null, - inputTokens: usage?.input ?? 0, - outputTokens: usage?.output ?? 0, - totalTokens: usage?.totalTokens ?? 0, - cost: usage?.cost.total ?? 0, - }); - }); - - application = await loadBuiltBrunchApplication(); - const client = createFlueClient({ - url: `http://brunch.local/agents/${CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE}/${instanceId}`, - fetch: (input, init) => - Promise.resolve( - application!.fetch( - input instanceof Request ? input : new Request(input, init), - ), - ).then((response) => response), - headers: agentOwnershipHeaders(identity), - }); - history = () => client.history(); - - const logicalTurnDurationsMs: number[] = []; - const dispatch = async (body: string): Promise => { - const firstCallIndex = modelCalls.length; - const admission = await client.send({ message: { kind: "user", body } }); - await client.wait(admission); - logicalTurnDurationsMs.push( - modelCalls - .slice(firstCallIndex) - .reduce((total, call) => total + call.durationMs, 0), - ); - }; - - let interviewTurns = 1; - let stopReason = "hard-stop"; - await dispatch(openingMessage); - - while (interviewTurns < hardStop) { - const previousDuration = logicalTurnDurationsMs.at(-1) ?? 0; - if (previousDuration > latencyStopMs) { - stopReason = "latency-stop"; - break; - } - // oxlint-disable-next-line eslint/no-await-in-loop -- interview turns are causally sequential. - const snapshot = await client.history(); - const interviewerText = latestAssistantText(snapshot); - if (interviewerText.length === 0) { - stopReason = "empty-interviewer"; - break; - } - // oxlint-disable-next-line eslint/no-await-in-loop -- the expert must answer this settled interviewer turn. - const expertReply = await askExpert(interviewerText); - // oxlint-disable-next-line eslint/no-await-in-loop -- the next interviewer turn depends on the expert reply. - await dispatch(expertReply); - interviewTurns += 1; - } - - await dispatch(finalizationMessage); - const snapshot = await client.history(); - const workpiece = recoverRunbookWorkpiece(snapshot); - const ir = workpiece?.content; - const toolNames = interviewerToolNamesFrom(snapshot); - const resourcePaths = skillResourcePathsFrom(snapshot); - const resourceFilesRead = [ - ...new Set(resourcePaths.map((path) => basename(path))), - ]; - const transcript = formatFlueTranscript(snapshot); - const rawConversationSnapshotSha256 = sha256(JSON.stringify(snapshot)); - const violations = ordinaryElicitationViolationsFrom(snapshot, { - hasWorkpiece: workpiece !== undefined, - }); - const status = violations.length === 0 ? "completed" : "invalid"; - const record = { - schemaVersion: 1, - protocolId: PROTOCOL_ID, - outputNamespaceId: OUTPUT_NAMESPACE_ID, - campaignFingerprint, - replication, - runId, - status, - startedAt, - completedAt: new Date().toISOString(), - ...campaignConfiguration, - interviewTurns, - stopReason, - finalizationMessage, - logicalTurnDurationsMs, - modelCalls, - expertUsage, - expertCalls, - expertMessages, - toolNames, - resourcePaths, - ir, - workpiece, - violations, - wroteCaptureStore: false, - instrument, - transcript, - rawConversationSnapshot: snapshot, - rawConversationSnapshotSha256, - }; - await writeFile( - `${artifactBase}.json`, - `${JSON.stringify(record, null, 2)}\n`, - { flag: "wx" }, - ); - await writeFile( - `${artifactBase}.md`, - [ - `# Prospective candidate runbook elicitation — replication ${replication}`, - "", - `- Protocol: \`${PROTOCOL_ID}\``, - `- Output namespace: \`${OUTPUT_NAMESPACE_ID}\``, - `- Run: \`${runId}\``, - `- Source commit: \`${sourceCommit}\``, - `- Interviewer: \`${interviewerModel}\``, - `- Simulated expert: \`${expertModel}\``, - `- Interview turns: ${interviewTurns} (hard stop ${hardStop})`, - `- Stop reason before final IR request: \`${stopReason}\``, - `- Recoverable IR: ${ir === undefined ? "no" : "yes"}`, - `- Member status: \`${status}\``, - ...(violations.length === 0 - ? [] - : violations.map( - (violation) => - `- Ordinary-path violation: \`${violation.code}\` — ${violation.detail}`, - )), - "- Final user message is an evaluation stop instruction, not expert evidence.", - "", - transcript, - "", - ].join("\n"), - { flag: "wx" }, - ); - if (ir !== undefined) { - await writeFile(`${artifactBase}.ir.md`, `${ir}\n`, { flag: "wx" }); - } - - process.stdout.write( - `PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V2_RESULT ${JSON.stringify({ - protocolId: PROTOCOL_ID, - outputNamespaceId: OUTPUT_NAMESPACE_ID, - replication, - stopReason, - hasIr: ir !== undefined, - interviewTurns, - toolNames, - resourceFilesRead, - wroteCaptureStore: false, - artifactBase, - })}\n`, - ); - if (status === "invalid") process.exitCode = 1; -} catch (error) { - let transcript: string | undefined; - let rawConversationSnapshot: FlueConversationSnapshot | undefined; - if (history !== undefined) { - try { - rawConversationSnapshot = await history(); - transcript = formatFlueTranscript(rawConversationSnapshot); - } catch { - // Preserve the originating failure even if history recovery also fails. - } - } - const failure = failureFrom(error); - const workpiece = - rawConversationSnapshot === undefined - ? undefined - : recoverRunbookWorkpiece(rawConversationSnapshot); - const violations = - rawConversationSnapshot === undefined - ? [] - : ordinaryElicitationViolationsFrom(rawConversationSnapshot, { - hasWorkpiece: workpiece !== undefined, - }); - const failureRecord = { - schemaVersion: 1, - protocolId: PROTOCOL_ID, - outputNamespaceId: OUTPUT_NAMESPACE_ID, - campaignFingerprint, - replication, - runId, - status: "invalid", - invalidReason: "runtime-failure", - startedAt, - failedAt: new Date().toISOString(), - ...campaignConfiguration, - finalizationMessage, - modelCalls, - expertUsage, - expertCalls, - expertMessages, - violations, - workpiece, - wroteCaptureStore: false, - instrument, - failure, - transcript, - rawConversationSnapshot, - rawConversationSnapshotSha256: - rawConversationSnapshot === undefined - ? undefined - : sha256(JSON.stringify(rawConversationSnapshot)), - }; - const failureArtifact = `${artifactBase}.failure-${randomUUID().slice(0, 8)}.json`; - let retentionFailure: unknown; - try { - await writeFile( - failureArtifact, - `${JSON.stringify(failureRecord, null, 2)}\n`, - { flag: "wx" }, - ); - } catch (retentionError) { - retentionFailure = retentionError; - } - process.stderr.write( - `PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V2_FAILURE ${JSON.stringify({ - runId, - artifact: retentionFailure === undefined ? failureArtifact : undefined, - failure, - retentionFailure: - retentionFailure instanceof Error - ? { - name: retentionFailure.name, - message: retentionFailure.message, - stack: retentionFailure.stack, - } - : retentionFailure === undefined - ? undefined - : { - name: "UnknownFailure", - message: unknownFailureMessage(retentionFailure), - }, - })}\n`, - ); - process.exitCode = 1; -} finally { - const cleanupFailures: Array<{ - readonly operation: string; - readonly name: string; - readonly message: string; - readonly stack?: string; - }> = []; - const retainCleanupFailure = (operation: string, error: unknown): void => { - cleanupFailures.push( - error instanceof Error - ? { - operation, - name: error.name, - message: error.message, - stack: error.stack, - } - : { - operation, - name: "UnknownFailure", - message: unknownFailureMessage(error), - }, - ); - }; - try { - stopObserving?.(); - } catch (error) { - retainCleanupFailure("stop-observing", error); - } - try { - await application?.stop(); - } catch (error) { - retainCleanupFailure("stop-application", error); - } - try { - await rm(databasePath, { force: true }); - } catch (error) { - retainCleanupFailure("remove-temporary-database", error); - } - if (cleanupFailures.length > 0) { - const cleanupArtifact = `${artifactBase}.cleanup-failure-${randomUUID().slice(0, 8)}.json`; - let retentionFailure: unknown; - try { - await writeFile( - cleanupArtifact, - `${JSON.stringify( - { - schemaVersion: 1, - protocolId: PROTOCOL_ID, - outputNamespaceId: OUTPUT_NAMESPACE_ID, - campaignFingerprint, - replication, - runId, - status: "invalid", - invalidReason: "cleanup-failure", - startedAt, - failedAt: new Date().toISOString(), - cleanupFailures, - instrument, - }, - null, - 2, - )}\n`, - { flag: "wx" }, - ); - } catch (error) { - retentionFailure = error; - } - process.stderr.write( - `PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V2_CLEANUP_FAILURE ${JSON.stringify({ - runId, - artifact: retentionFailure === undefined ? cleanupArtifact : undefined, - cleanupFailures, - retentionFailure: - retentionFailure instanceof Error - ? { - name: retentionFailure.name, - message: retentionFailure.message, - } - : retentionFailure === undefined - ? undefined - : { - name: "UnknownFailure", - message: unknownFailureMessage(retentionFailure), - }, - })}\n`, - ); - process.exitCode = 1; - } -} diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/architecture-score-report.test.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/architecture-score-report.test.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..2ea99c4adbc --- /dev/null +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/architecture-score-report.test.ts @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ +import { readFileSync } from "node:fs"; +import { join } from "node:path"; + +import { describe, expect, test } from "vitest"; + +import { scoreReport } from "../../../libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/score-report.ts"; + +describe("architecture score report validation", () => { + test("recomputes the weighted omniscient total", () => { + const report = ` +## Verdict +- Weighted total: 72.5 / 100 + +## Score vector +| Dimension | Score (0–4) | Weighted points | Evidence | +| --- | ---: | ---: | --- | +| A | 3 | 15 | x | +| B | 4 | 20 | x | +| C | 4 | 20 | x | +| D | 4 | 15 | x | +| E | 3 | 11.25 | x | +| F | 3 | 7.5 | x | + +## Acquisition accounting +`; + + expect(scoreReport("omniscient", report)).toEqual({ + computed: 88.8, + reported: 72.5, + scores: [3, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3], + valid: false, + }); + }); + + test("recomputes the cold arithmetic mean", () => { + const report = ` +## Verdict +- Overall cold utility: **3.2 / 4** + +## Scorecard +| Subdimension | Score (0–4) | Evidence | +| --- | ---: | --- | +| A | 4.0 | x | +| B | 3.5 | x | +| C | 3.0 | x | +| D | 4.0 | x | +| E | 3.5 | x | +| F | 2.5 | x | + +## Load-bearing assumptions +`; + + expect(scoreReport("cold", report)).toEqual({ + computed: 3.4, + reported: 3.2, + scores: [4, 3.5, 3, 4, 3.5, 2.5], + valid: false, + }); + }); + + test("pins the v3 arithmetic errata to the retained raw reports", () => { + const evidenceDirectory = join( + import.meta.dirname, + "../../../libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3", + ); + const artifactStem = + "prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006"; + + expect( + scoreReport( + "omniscient", + readFileSync( + join(evidenceDirectory, `${artifactStem}.omniscient.md`), + "utf8", + ), + ), + ).toMatchObject({ computed: 88.8, reported: 72.5, valid: false }); + expect( + scoreReport( + "cold", + readFileSync( + join(evidenceDirectory, `${artifactStem}.cold-attempt-2.md`), + "utf8", + ), + ), + ).toMatchObject({ computed: 3.4, reported: 3.2, valid: false }); + }); +}); diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/architecture/boundaries.integration.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/architecture/boundaries.integration.ts index 19c809034ee..3d83cbf5c59 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/architecture/boundaries.integration.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/architecture/boundaries.integration.ts @@ -214,19 +214,21 @@ describe("dependency direction", () => { } }); - test("transports consume their wire encoder only — never core, a binding, or Flue", () => { + test("transports consume wire contracts only — never a binding or Flue", () => { const transports = byRole("transport"); expect(transports.length).toBeGreaterThan(0); for (const transport of transports) { expect(runtimeDependencies(transport).sort()).toEqual( - ["ai", "valibot"].sort(), + [CORE, "ai", "valibot"].sort(), ); for (const file of sourceFiles(transport).filter((file) => file.path.startsWith(join(transport.path, "src")), )) { for (const specifier of importedPackages(file)) { if (specifier.startsWith("node:")) continue; - expect(["ai", "valibot"]).toContain(packageOf(specifier)); + expect([CORE, "ai", "valibot"]).toContain(packageOf(specifier)); + expect(specifier).not.toBe(`${CORE}/storage`); + expect(specifier).not.toBe(`${CORE}/prompts`); } } } @@ -509,8 +511,6 @@ describe("the HASH smoke is runnable without a model key or a network (spec §12 "Boots the built Flue ChatAgent with pi-ai's faux provider and a headless Petrinaut client to prove validated construct-only tool flow without a provider key, socket, or network model call.", "apps/brunch-agent/test/skill-routing.integration.ts": "Boots the built Flue ChatAgent with pi-ai's faux provider to prove resolvable-review restraint, required human-gap disclosure, one-question dosage, and workpiece-revision routing without a provider key, socket, or network model call.", - "apps/brunch-agent/test/turn-timing.test.ts": - "Types recorded Flue observations and model requests so the condition-5 purpose splitter can be unit-tested; the import is type-only — no provider key, no socket, no model call, no runtime boot.", }; test("no test file carries a live model credential", () => { diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/prospective-runbook-v3.test.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/prospective-runbook-v3.test.ts deleted file mode 100644 index b4bb4afe91e..00000000000 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/prospective-runbook-v3.test.ts +++ /dev/null @@ -1,100 +0,0 @@ -import { mkdtemp, readFile, readdir, rm } from "node:fs/promises"; -import { tmpdir } from "node:os"; -import { join } from "node:path"; - -import { expect, test } from "vitest"; - -import { runNodeScript } from "./run-node-script"; - -const testDirectory = import.meta.dirname; -const repositoryRoot = join(testDirectory, "../../.."); -const runnerPath = join( - testDirectory, - "../src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v3-run.ts", -); -const modelKeyName = ["ANTHROPIC", "API", "KEY"].join("_"); - -test("the hermetic v3 runner freezes the architecture-only comparison target", async () => { - const outputDirectory = await mkdtemp( - join(tmpdir(), "brunch-architecture-v3-"), - ); - try { - const { exitCode, stdout, stderr } = await runNodeScript( - runnerPath, - repositoryRoot, - { - [modelKeyName]: "", - BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL: "claude-haiku-4-5", - BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_EXPERT_MODEL: "faux-vestera-expert", - BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_HARD_STOP: "2", - BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_REPLICATION: "1", - BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_OUTPUT_DIR: outputDirectory, - BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ALLOW_DIRTY_INSTRUMENT: "1", - BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ANTHROPIC_MODULE: join( - testDirectory, - "runbook-elicitation-faux-expert.ts", - ), - BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_INTERVIEWER_PROVIDER_MODULE: join( - testDirectory, - "runbook-elicitation-faux-provider.ts", - ), - }, - ); - - expect(exitCode, stderr || stdout).toBe(0); - const resultLine = stdout - .split("\n") - .find((line) => line.startsWith("PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V3_RESULT ")); - expect(resultLine).toBeDefined(); - const result = JSON.parse( - resultLine!.slice("PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V3_RESULT ".length), - ) as { - outputNamespaceId: string; - protocolId: string; - }; - expect(result).toMatchObject({ - protocolId: "prospective-runbook-v3", - outputNamespaceId: "vestera-architecture-candidate-v3", - }); - - const recordName = (await readdir(outputDirectory)).find((name) => - name.endsWith(".json"), - ); - const record = JSON.parse( - await readFile(join(outputDirectory, recordName!), "utf8"), - ) as { - comparisonTarget: { - memberRunIds: string[]; - outputNamespaceId: string; - qualityPopulation: string; - runtimeAccounting: string; - }; - instrument: { - fileSha256: Record; - }; - }; - expect(record.comparisonTarget).toEqual({ - protocolId: "prospective-runbook-v1", - outputNamespaceId: "vestera-prospective-baseline-v1", - memberRunIds: [ - "runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-50-28-709Z-20a4817f", - "runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-56-34-754Z-4b75737c", - ], - qualityPopulation: "valid-workpieces", - runtimeAccounting: "reported-separately", - }); - for (const runId of record.comparisonTarget.memberRunIds) { - expect(record.instrument.fileSha256).toHaveProperty( - `libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/${runId}.ir.md`, - ); - expect(record.instrument.fileSha256).toHaveProperty( - `libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/${runId}.omniscient.md`, - ); - expect(record.instrument.fileSha256).toHaveProperty( - `libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/${runId}.cold.md`, - ); - } - } finally { - await rm(outputDirectory, { recursive: true, force: true }); - } -}); diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/prospective-runbook-v2.test.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/prospective-runbook-v4.test.ts similarity index 86% rename from apps/brunch-agent/test/prospective-runbook-v2.test.ts rename to apps/brunch-agent/test/prospective-runbook-v4.test.ts index 97bf830e2c6..8913d5a3606 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/prospective-runbook-v2.test.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/prospective-runbook-v4.test.ts @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ import { runNodeScript } from "./run-node-script"; const testDirectory = import.meta.dirname; const runnerPath = join( testDirectory, - "../src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v2-run.ts", + "../../../libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/run.ts", ); const repositoryRoot = join(testDirectory, "../../.."); const frozenBaselineDirectory = join( @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ test.each([ ); test("hermetic candidate runs reject a symlink into immutable v1", async () => { - const directory = await mkdtemp(join(tmpdir(), "brunch-v2-baseline-link-")); + const directory = await mkdtemp(join(tmpdir(), "brunch-v4-baseline-link-")); const outputDirectory = join(directory, "baseline-alias"); await symlink(frozenBaselineDirectory, outputDirectory, "dir"); try { @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ test("hermetic candidate runs reject a symlink into immutable v1", async () => { test("hermetic candidate runs admit only the checked-in faux modules", async () => { const outputDirectory = await mkdtemp( - join(tmpdir(), "brunch-candidate-v2-module-guard-"), + join(tmpdir(), "brunch-candidate-v4-module-guard-"), ); try { const { exitCode, stderr } = await runNodeScript( @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ test("hermetic candidate runs admit only the checked-in faux modules", async () test("hermetic candidate runs reject a model API key", async () => { const outputDirectory = await mkdtemp( - join(tmpdir(), "brunch-candidate-v2-key-guard-"), + join(tmpdir(), "brunch-candidate-v4-key-guard-"), ); try { const { exitCode, stderr } = await runNodeScript( @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ test("hermetic candidate runs reject a model API key", async () => { test("paid candidate runs reject a different output namespace", async () => { const outputDirectory = await mkdtemp( - join(tmpdir(), "brunch-candidate-v2-wrong-output-"), + join(tmpdir(), "brunch-candidate-v4-wrong-output-"), ); try { const { exitCode, stderr } = await runNodeScript( @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ test("paid candidate runs reject a different output namespace", async () => { expect(exitCode).not.toBe(0); expect(stderr).toContain( - "Paid candidate runs must write to vestera-prospective-candidate-v2", + "Paid candidate runs must write to vestera-architecture-candidate-v4", ); } finally { await rm(outputDirectory, { recursive: true, force: true }); @@ -162,13 +162,13 @@ test("paid candidate runs reject changed frozen configuration", async () => { expect(exitCode).not.toBe(0); expect(stderr).toContain( - "require the frozen prospective-runbook-v2 model, turn, and latency configuration", + "require the frozen prospective-runbook-v4 model, turn, and latency configuration", ); }); test("the hermetic candidate run records its exact instrument and workpiece", async () => { const outputDirectory = await mkdtemp( - join(tmpdir(), "brunch-candidate-v2-success-"), + join(tmpdir(), "brunch-candidate-v4-success-"), ); try { const { exitCode, stdout, stderr } = await runNodeScript( @@ -180,10 +180,10 @@ test("the hermetic candidate run records its exact instrument and workpiece", as expect(exitCode, stderr || stdout).toBe(0); const resultLine = stdout .split("\n") - .find((line) => line.startsWith("PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V2_RESULT ")); + .find((line) => line.startsWith("PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V4_RESULT ")); expect(resultLine, stdout).toBeDefined(); const result = JSON.parse( - resultLine!.slice("PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V2_RESULT ".length), + resultLine!.slice("PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V4_RESULT ".length), ) as { artifactBase: string; hasIr: boolean; @@ -195,8 +195,8 @@ test("the hermetic candidate run records its exact instrument and workpiece", as wroteCaptureStore: boolean; }; expect(result).toMatchObject({ - protocolId: "prospective-runbook-v2", - outputNamespaceId: "vestera-prospective-candidate-v2", + protocolId: "prospective-runbook-v4", + outputNamespaceId: "vestera-architecture-candidate-v4", replication: 1, hasIr: true, wroteCaptureStore: false, @@ -212,6 +212,13 @@ test("the hermetic candidate run records its exact instrument and workpiece", as await readFile(`${result.artifactBase}.json`, "utf8"), ) as { campaignFingerprint: string; + comparisonTarget: { + memberRunIds: string[]; + outputNamespaceId: string; + protocolId: string; + qualityPopulation: string; + runtimeAccounting: string; + }; expertCalls: Array<{ observedModel: string | null; requestedModel: string; @@ -240,6 +247,16 @@ test("the hermetic candidate run records its exact instrument and workpiece", as }; }; expect(record.status).toBe("completed"); + expect(record.comparisonTarget).toEqual({ + protocolId: "prospective-runbook-v1", + outputNamespaceId: "vestera-prospective-baseline-v1", + memberRunIds: [ + "runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-50-28-709Z-20a4817f", + "runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-56-34-754Z-4b75737c", + ], + qualityPopulation: "valid-workpieces", + runtimeAccounting: "reported-separately", + }); expect(record.campaignFingerprint).toMatch(/^[0-9a-f]{64}$/u); expect(record.instrument.sourceCommit).toMatch(/^[0-9a-f]{40}$/u); expect(record.instrument.builtArtifactManifestSha256).toMatch( @@ -301,14 +318,18 @@ test("the hermetic candidate run records its exact instrument and workpiece", as "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md", "apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/chat-agent/agent.ts", - "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v2-run.ts", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/run.ts", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/opening-message.md", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/situation-pack.md", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/vestera-scheduling/truth-ledger-v1-prospective.yaml", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/ir-quality-ruler-v1.md", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1/omniscient-grader.md", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1/cold-ir-reviewer.md", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v2/protocol.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/mission-4-product-witness-v2/protocol.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/protocol.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/run.ts", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/grade.ts", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/score-report.ts", ]) { expect(record.instrument.fileSha256).toHaveProperty(requiredPath); } @@ -319,8 +340,8 @@ test("the hermetic candidate run records its exact instrument and workpiece", as test("two identical hermetic runs retain the same build manifest and fingerprint", async () => { const outputDirectories = await Promise.all([ - mkdtemp(join(tmpdir(), "brunch-candidate-v2-stability-a-")), - mkdtemp(join(tmpdir(), "brunch-candidate-v2-stability-b-")), + mkdtemp(join(tmpdir(), "brunch-candidate-v4-stability-a-")), + mkdtemp(join(tmpdir(), "brunch-candidate-v4-stability-b-")), ]); try { const records = await Promise.all( @@ -372,7 +393,7 @@ test.each([ "an adversarial hermetic %s is retained as invalid", async (_, violation, expectedCode) => { const outputDirectory = await mkdtemp( - join(tmpdir(), "brunch-candidate-v2-invalid-"), + join(tmpdir(), "brunch-candidate-v4-invalid-"), ); try { const { exitCode, stdout, stderr } = await runNodeScript( @@ -408,7 +429,7 @@ test.each([ test("a runtime failure retains a machine-readable candidate artifact", async () => { const outputDirectory = await mkdtemp( - join(tmpdir(), "brunch-candidate-v2-failure-"), + join(tmpdir(), "brunch-candidate-v4-failure-"), ); try { const { exitCode, stderr } = await runNodeScript( @@ -421,7 +442,7 @@ test("a runtime failure retains a machine-readable candidate artifact", async () ); expect(exitCode).not.toBe(0); - expect(stderr).toContain("PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V2_FAILURE"); + expect(stderr).toContain("PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V4_FAILURE"); const files = await readdir(outputDirectory); expect(files).toHaveLength(1); expect(files[0]).toMatch(/\.failure-[0-9a-f]{8}\.json$/u); @@ -438,15 +459,15 @@ test("a runtime failure retains a machine-readable candidate artifact", async () rawConversationSnapshot?: unknown; }; expect(failureRecord).toMatchObject({ - protocolId: "prospective-runbook-v2", - outputNamespaceId: "vestera-prospective-candidate-v2", + protocolId: "prospective-runbook-v4", + outputNamespaceId: "vestera-architecture-candidate-v4", replication: 1, status: "invalid", invalidReason: "runtime-failure", failure: { message: "Deliberate faux expert failure" }, }); expect(failureRecord.runId).toContain( - "prospective-runbook-v2-replication-1", + "prospective-runbook-v4-replication-1", ); expect(failureRecord.rawConversationSnapshot).toBeDefined(); } finally { @@ -456,7 +477,7 @@ test("a runtime failure retains a machine-readable candidate artifact", async () test("an artifact write collision retains the original failure at a distinct path", async () => { const outputDirectory = await mkdtemp( - join(tmpdir(), "brunch-candidate-v2-write-failure-"), + join(tmpdir(), "brunch-candidate-v4-write-failure-"), ); try { const { exitCode, stderr } = await runNodeScript( @@ -492,7 +513,7 @@ test("an artifact write collision retains the original failure at a distinct pat test("cleanup errors are visible and retained without masking the run", async () => { const outputDirectory = await mkdtemp( - join(tmpdir(), "brunch-candidate-v2-cleanup-failure-"), + join(tmpdir(), "brunch-candidate-v4-cleanup-failure-"), ); let databasePath: string | undefined; try { @@ -506,13 +527,13 @@ test("cleanup errors are visible and retained without masking the run", async () ); expect(exitCode).not.toBe(0); - expect(stderr).toContain("PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V2_CLEANUP_FAILURE"); + expect(stderr).toContain("PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V4_CLEANUP_FAILURE"); const resultLine = stdout .split("\n") - .find((line) => line.startsWith("PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V2_RESULT ")); + .find((line) => line.startsWith("PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V4_RESULT ")); expect(resultLine).toBeDefined(); const { artifactBase } = JSON.parse( - resultLine!.slice("PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V2_RESULT ".length), + resultLine!.slice("PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V4_RESULT ".length), ) as { artifactBase: string }; databasePath = join(tmpdir(), `${basename(artifactBase)}.db`); const cleanupName = (await readdir(outputDirectory)).find((name) => diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-artifacts.test.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-artifacts.test.ts index a8226506e43..1c1bf523d76 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-artifacts.test.ts +++ b/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-artifacts.test.ts @@ -120,6 +120,168 @@ describe("runbook artifact recovery", () => { ); }); + test("rejects more than one explicit question in an assistant turn", () => { + const snapshot = snapshotWithAssistantText( + "What starts the process? Who performs the first step?", + ); + + expect( + ordinaryElicitationViolationsFrom(snapshot, { hasWorkpiece: false }), + ).toContainEqual({ + code: "multiple-questions", + detail: "a1: 2 question marks", + }); + }); + + test("does not count questions recorded inside the workpiece as interactive questions", () => { + const snapshot = snapshotWithAssistantText( + "```runbook-ir\n# Workpiece\n## Open questions\n- Who signs off?\n- When is the crew released?\n```", + ); + + expect( + ordinaryElicitationViolationsFrom(snapshot, { hasWorkpiece: true }), + ).not.toContainEqual( + expect.objectContaining({ code: "multiple-questions" }), + ); + }); + + test("requires successful universal, profile, and workpiece reads for an ordinary workpiece", () => { + const snapshot = snapshotWithAssistantText( + "What process should we model?\n```runbook-ir\n# Workpiece\n```", + ); + + expect( + ordinaryElicitationViolationsFrom(snapshot, { hasWorkpiece: true }), + ).toEqual( + expect.arrayContaining([ + { + code: "missing-required-resource", + detail: "universal-elicitation.md", + }, + { code: "missing-required-resource", detail: "profile.md" }, + { code: "missing-required-resource", detail: "workpiece.md" }, + ]), + ); + }); + + test("requires guidance before the first question and the template before workpiece creation", () => { + const snapshot = { + messages: [ + { + id: "a1", + role: "assistant", + purpose: "assistant", + display: "visible", + parts: [ + { + type: "text", + text: "What process should we model?", + state: "done", + }, + ...["universal-elicitation.md", "profile.md"].map( + (name, index) => ({ + type: "dynamic-tool" as const, + toolCallId: `guidance-${index}`, + toolName: "read_skill_resource", + state: "output-available" as const, + input: { + path: `/.flue/packaged-skills/example/references/${name}`, + }, + output: "ok", + }), + ), + { + type: "text", + text: "```runbook-ir\n# Workpiece\n```", + state: "done", + }, + { + type: "dynamic-tool", + toolCallId: "template", + toolName: "read_skill_resource", + state: "output-available", + input: { + path: "/.flue/packaged-skills/example/templates/workpiece.md", + }, + output: "ok", + }, + ], + }, + ], + } as FlueConversationSnapshot; + + expect( + ordinaryElicitationViolationsFrom(snapshot, { hasWorkpiece: true }), + ).toEqual( + expect.arrayContaining([ + { + code: "late-required-resource", + detail: "universal-elicitation.md: after first question", + }, + { + code: "late-required-resource", + detail: "profile.md: after first question", + }, + { + code: "late-required-resource", + detail: "workpiece.md: after first workpiece", + }, + ]), + ); + }); + + test("accepts ordered required disclosure on an ordinary workpiece path", () => { + const snapshot = { + messages: [ + { + id: "a1", + role: "assistant", + purpose: "assistant", + display: "visible", + parts: [ + ...[ + ["references", "universal-elicitation.md"], + ["references", "profile.md"], + ].map(([directory, name], index) => ({ + type: "dynamic-tool" as const, + toolCallId: `guidance-${index}`, + toolName: "read_skill_resource", + state: "output-available" as const, + input: { + path: `/.flue/packaged-skills/example/${directory}/${name}`, + }, + output: "ok", + })), + { + type: "text", + text: "What process should we model?", + state: "done", + }, + { + type: "dynamic-tool", + toolCallId: "template", + toolName: "read_skill_resource", + state: "output-available", + input: { + path: "/.flue/packaged-skills/example/templates/workpiece.md", + }, + output: "ok", + }, + { + type: "text", + text: "```runbook-ir\n# Workpiece\n```", + state: "done", + }, + ], + }, + ], + } as FlueConversationSnapshot; + + expect( + ordinaryElicitationViolationsFrom(snapshot, { hasWorkpiece: true }), + ).toEqual([]); + }); + test("collects only successfully read skill resource paths", () => { const snapshot = { messages: [ diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation.test.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation.test.ts deleted file mode 100644 index 713ed905791..00000000000 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/runbook-elicitation.test.ts +++ /dev/null @@ -1,226 +0,0 @@ -import { mkdtemp, readFile, readdir, rm, symlink } from "node:fs/promises"; -import { tmpdir } from "node:os"; -import { join } from "node:path"; - -import { expect, test } from "vitest"; - -import { runNodeScript } from "./run-node-script"; - -const testDirectory = import.meta.dirname; -const runnerPath = join( - testDirectory, - "../src/evaluations/runbook/elicitation-run.ts", -); -const repositoryRoot = join(testDirectory, "../../.."); -const frozenBaselineDirectory = join( - repositoryRoot, - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1", -); -const MODEL_KEY_NAME = ["ANTHROPIC", "API", "KEY"].join("_"); - -const hermeticEnvironment = ( - outputDirectory: string, -): Record => ({ - [MODEL_KEY_NAME]: "", - BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL: "claude-haiku-4-5", - BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_EXPERT_MODEL: "faux-vestera-expert", - BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_HARD_STOP: "2", - BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_OUTPUT_DIR: outputDirectory, - BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ALLOW_DIRTY_INSTRUMENT: "1", - BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ANTHROPIC_MODULE: join( - testDirectory, - "runbook-elicitation-faux-expert.ts", - ), - BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_INTERVIEWER_PROVIDER_MODULE: join( - testDirectory, - "runbook-elicitation-faux-provider.ts", - ), -}); - -test.each([ - ["exact", frozenBaselineDirectory], - ["dot alias", `${frozenBaselineDirectory}/.`], - ["descendant", join(frozenBaselineDirectory, "forbidden-descendant")], -])( - "relocated v1 categorically rejects the frozen campaign %s path", - async (_, outputDirectory) => { - const { exitCode, stderr } = await runNodeScript( - runnerPath, - repositoryRoot, - { - ...hermeticEnvironment(outputDirectory), - BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL: "claude-sonnet-4-5", - BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_EXPERT_MODEL: "claude-sonnet-4-5", - BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_HARD_STOP: "8", - BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_LATENCY_STOP_MS: "180000", - }, - ); - - expect(exitCode).not.toBe(0); - expect(stderr).toContain("immutable vestera-prospective-baseline-v1"); - }, -); - -test("relocated v1 categorically rejects a symlink into the frozen campaign", async () => { - const directory = await mkdtemp(join(tmpdir(), "brunch-v1-baseline-link-")); - const outputDirectory = join(directory, "baseline-alias"); - await symlink(frozenBaselineDirectory, outputDirectory, "dir"); - try { - const { exitCode, stderr } = await runNodeScript( - runnerPath, - repositoryRoot, - hermeticEnvironment(outputDirectory), - ); - - expect(exitCode).not.toBe(0); - expect(stderr).toContain("immutable vestera-prospective-baseline-v1"); - } finally { - await rm(directory, { recursive: true, force: true }); - } -}); - -test("the prospective runner records a recoverable IR without construction or capture machinery", async () => { - const outputDirectory = await mkdtemp( - join(tmpdir(), "brunch-runbook-elicitation-"), - ); - try { - const { exitCode, stdout, stderr } = await runNodeScript( - runnerPath, - repositoryRoot, - { - BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL: "claude-haiku-4-5", - BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_EXPERT_MODEL: "faux-vestera-expert", - BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_HARD_STOP: "2", - BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_OUTPUT_DIR: outputDirectory, - BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ALLOW_DIRTY_INSTRUMENT: "1", - BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ANTHROPIC_MODULE: join( - testDirectory, - "runbook-elicitation-faux-expert.ts", - ), - BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_INTERVIEWER_PROVIDER_MODULE: join( - testDirectory, - "runbook-elicitation-faux-provider.ts", - ), - }, - ); - expect(exitCode, stderr || stdout).toBe(0); - const resultLine = stdout - .split("\n") - .find((line) => line.startsWith("RUNBOOK_ELICITATION_RESULT ")); - expect(resultLine, stdout).toBeDefined(); - const result = JSON.parse( - resultLine!.slice("RUNBOOK_ELICITATION_RESULT ".length), - ) as { - artifactBase: string; - hasIr: boolean; - interviewTurns: number; - resourceFilesRead: string[]; - toolNames: string[]; - wroteCaptureStore: boolean; - }; - expect(result.hasIr).toBe(true); - expect(result.interviewTurns).toBe(2); - expect(result.toolNames).toEqual(["activate_skill", "read_skill_resource"]); - expect(result.toolNames).not.toEqual( - expect.arrayContaining([ - "brunch_ask", - "brunch_sweep", - "addPlace", - "addTransition", - ]), - ); - expect(result.resourceFilesRead).toEqual([ - "universal-elicitation.md", - "profile.md", - "workpiece.md", - ]); - expect(result.wroteCaptureStore).toBe(false); - - const files = await readdir(outputDirectory); - expect(files).toEqual( - expect.arrayContaining([ - `${result.artifactBase.split("/").at(-1)}.ir.md`, - `${result.artifactBase.split("/").at(-1)}.json`, - `${result.artifactBase.split("/").at(-1)}.md`, - ]), - ); - const record = JSON.parse( - await readFile(`${result.artifactBase}.json`, "utf8"), - ) as { - instrument: { - sourceCommit: string; - fileSha256: Record; - }; - finalizationMessage: string; - }; - expect(record.instrument.sourceCommit).toMatch(/^[0-9a-f]{40}$/u); - expect(record.instrument.fileSha256).toHaveProperty( - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling/opening-message.md", - ); - expect(record.instrument.fileSha256).toHaveProperty( - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts", - ); - expect(record.finalizationMessage).toContain("not expert evidence"); - } finally { - await rm(outputDirectory, { recursive: true, force: true }); - } -}); - -test("the prospective runner retains evidence when the expert returns no text", async () => { - const outputDirectory = await mkdtemp( - join(tmpdir(), "brunch-runbook-elicitation-failure-"), - ); - try { - const { exitCode, stdout } = await runNodeScript( - join(testDirectory, "../src/runbook-elicitation-run.ts"), - join(testDirectory, "../../.."), - { - BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL: "claude-haiku-4-5", - BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_EXPERT_MODEL: "faux-vestera-expert", - BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_HARD_STOP: "2", - BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_OUTPUT_DIR: outputDirectory, - BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ALLOW_DIRTY_INSTRUMENT: "1", - BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ANTHROPIC_MODULE: join( - testDirectory, - "runbook-elicitation-faux-expert.ts", - ), - BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_INTERVIEWER_PROVIDER_MODULE: join( - testDirectory, - "runbook-elicitation-faux-provider.ts", - ), - BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_EMPTY_EXPERT: "1", - }, - ); - expect(exitCode).toBe(1); - const resultLine = stdout - .split("\n") - .find((line) => line.startsWith("RUNBOOK_ELICITATION_RESULT ")); - expect(resultLine, stdout).toBeDefined(); - const result = JSON.parse( - resultLine!.slice("RUNBOOK_ELICITATION_RESULT ".length), - ) as { - artifactBase: string; - failure: string; - }; - expect(result.failure).toBe("The simulated expert returned no text"); - expect(await readdir(outputDirectory)).toEqual( - expect.arrayContaining([ - `${result.artifactBase.split("/").at(-1)}.ir.md`, - `${result.artifactBase.split("/").at(-1)}.json`, - `${result.artifactBase.split("/").at(-1)}.md`, - ]), - ); - const record = JSON.parse( - await readFile(`${result.artifactBase}.json`, "utf8"), - ) as { - failure: string; - stopReason: string; - }; - expect(record).toMatchObject({ - failure: "The simulated expert returned no text", - stopReason: "expert-error", - }); - } finally { - await rm(outputDirectory, { recursive: true, force: true }); - } -}); diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/test/turn-timing.test.ts b/apps/brunch-agent/test/turn-timing.test.ts deleted file mode 100644 index 35c65f43629..00000000000 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/test/turn-timing.test.ts +++ /dev/null @@ -1,233 +0,0 @@ -import { expect, test } from "vitest"; - -import { - createTurnTimingRecorder, - type TurnTimingPurpose, -} from "../../../libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/legacy-baseline/turn-timing.ts"; - -import type { FlueObservation, ModelRequest } from "@flue/runtime"; - -const observation = ( - event: Partial & Pick, -): FlueObservation => event as FlueObservation; - -const request = (latestUserMessage = "Continue."): ModelRequest => ({ - providerId: "faux", - providerName: "faux", - requestedModel: "faux-model", - api: "faux", - input: { - messages: [{ role: "user", content: latestUserMessage }], - }, -}); - -const completedTurn = ( - turnId: string, - operationId: string | undefined, - purpose: "agent" | "compaction", -): FlueObservation => - observation({ - type: "turn", - turnId, - operationId, - purpose, - durationMs: 17, - request: { - providerId: "faux", - providerName: "faux", - requestedModel: "faux-model", - api: "faux", - }, - response: {}, - isError: false, - }); - -test("attributes post-sweep compaction to the completed harness purpose", () => { - const recorder = createTurnTimingRecorder(); - recorder.startInterviewerTurn(1); - recorder.observe( - observation({ - type: "operation_start", - operationId: "outer", - operationKind: "prompt", - }), - ); - recorder.observe( - observation({ - type: "turn_request", - turnId: "interview", - operationId: "outer", - purpose: "agent", - request: request(), - }), - ); - recorder.observe(completedTurn("interview", "outer", "agent")); - recorder.observe( - observation({ - type: "operation_start", - operationId: "sweep-extraction", - operationKind: "prompt", - }), - ); - recorder.observe( - observation({ - type: "turn_request", - turnId: "sweep", - operationId: "sweep-extraction", - purpose: "agent", - request: request("Extract proposals."), - }), - ); - recorder.observe(completedTurn("sweep", "sweep-extraction", "agent")); - recorder.observe( - observation({ - type: "operation", - operationId: "sweep-extraction", - operationKind: "prompt", - }), - ); - recorder.observe( - observation({ - type: "tool", - toolName: "brunch_sweep", - toolCallId: "applied-sweep", - isError: false, - result: { status: "applied" }, - durationMs: 1, - }), - ); - recorder.observe( - observation({ - type: "turn_request", - turnId: "sweep-compaction", - operationId: "sweep-compaction-operation", - purpose: "compaction", - request: request(), - }), - ); - recorder.observe( - completedTurn( - "sweep-compaction", - "sweep-compaction-operation", - "compaction", - ), - ); - - expect( - Object.fromEntries( - recorder - .all() - .map((timing) => [timing.flueTurnId, timing.purpose] as const), - ), - ).toEqual>({ - interview: "interview", - sweep: "sweep", - "sweep-compaction": "sweep", - }); -}); - -test("attributes an inline retry after a refused sweep as repair", () => { - const recorder = createTurnTimingRecorder(); - recorder.startInterviewerTurn(1); - recorder.observe( - observation({ - type: "operation_start", - operationId: "outer", - operationKind: "prompt", - }), - ); - recorder.observe( - observation({ - type: "turn_request", - turnId: "interview", - operationId: "outer", - purpose: "agent", - request: request(), - }), - ); - recorder.observe( - observation({ - type: "operation_start", - operationId: "initial-extraction", - operationKind: "prompt", - }), - ); - recorder.observe( - observation({ - type: "turn_request", - turnId: "sweep-extraction", - operationId: "initial-extraction", - purpose: "agent", - request: request("Extract proposals."), - }), - ); - recorder.observe( - completedTurn("sweep-extraction", "initial-extraction", "agent"), - ); - recorder.observe( - observation({ - type: "operation", - operationId: "initial-extraction", - operationKind: "prompt", - }), - ); - recorder.observe( - observation({ - type: "tool", - toolName: "brunch_sweep", - toolCallId: "refused-sweep", - isError: false, - result: { status: "refused" }, - durationMs: 1, - }), - ); - recorder.observe( - observation({ - type: "operation_start", - operationId: "repair-extraction", - operationKind: "prompt", - }), - ); - recorder.observe( - observation({ - type: "turn_request", - turnId: "repair-compaction", - operationId: "repair-compaction-operation", - purpose: "compaction", - request: request(), - }), - ); - recorder.observe( - completedTurn( - "repair-compaction", - "repair-compaction-operation", - "compaction", - ), - ); - recorder.observe( - observation({ - type: "turn_request", - turnId: "repair-extraction", - operationId: "repair-extraction", - purpose: "agent", - request: request("Extract repaired proposals."), - }), - ); - recorder.observe( - completedTurn("repair-extraction", "repair-extraction", "agent"), - ); - recorder.observe(completedTurn("interview", "outer", "agent")); - - expect( - Object.fromEntries( - recorder - .all() - .map((timing) => [timing.flueTurnId, timing.purpose] as const), - ), - ).toEqual>({ - "sweep-extraction": "sweep", - "repair-compaction": "repair", - "repair-extraction": "repair", - interview: "interview", - }); -}); diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-archive/4-accepted-prompt-skill-workpiece-architecture.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md similarity index 83% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-archive/4-accepted-prompt-skill-workpiece-architecture.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md index 54f2390276e..9c5f47a1d53 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-archive/4-accepted-prompt-skill-workpiece-architecture.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md @@ -2,24 +2,20 @@ ## Status -Closed on 2026-09-02 with the owner-selected prompt, skill, and workpiece architecture promoted and accepted as baseline-competitive with explicit limitations. This archived contract is no longer execution authority. Mission 5 remains uncut and unimplemented. +Live. Reopened on 2026-09-02 after review found that the attempted close did not satisfy this contract. This file is again the sole execution authority for [FE-1563](https://linear.app/hash/issue/FE-1563/redesign-the-elicitation-runbook-and-workpiece-against-the-frozen). Mission 5 remains uncut and unimplemented. -Close evidence: +The production architecture is retained, but the first v3 paid campaign, repaired browser witness, adjudication, Mission 5 handoff, and close record do not satisfy proof items 3, 7, 8, 9, or 10. They remain historical failure evidence only. The [owner-gate clarification](docs/evidence/decisions/mission-4-owner-gates-2026-09-02.md) confirms that the prior budget, campaign, witness-repair, witness-acceptance, and closure authorizations occurred, but withdraws the resulting acceptance and requires the reserved owner gates to be restored. No new paid call, freeze, adjudication, witness acceptance, handoff selection, or closure is authorized by this reopening. -- [`../evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/campaign-adjudication.md`](../evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/campaign-adjudication.md) compares the one valid candidate workpiece only with the latest two valid flat-prompt controls: omniscient `72.5 / 100`, cold `3.2 / 4`, conditional readiness, and no hard-failure gate. -- [`../evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/product-witness.md`](../evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/product-witness.md) records the accepted local/restricted Petrinaut → AI SDK → production Flue `ChatAgent` witness, the exposed relative-resource-path failure, and the owner-authorized exact-URI repair. -- [`../evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/mission-5-handoff.md`](../evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/mission-5-handoff.md) freezes the selected workpiece, exact source snapshot and message binding, candidate manifest, grades, adjudication, and remaining gaps. - -Mission 3's prospective campaign remains the immutable control: one invalid runtime member and two valid independently graded workpieces, with the adjudicated range in [`../evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md`](../evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md). Its observed artifacts and source revision `b738aa1be1a62a9f9cdde89ced78558f04293a77` remain the exact v1 instrument of record. +Mission 3's prospective campaign remains the immutable control: one invalid runtime member and two valid independently graded workpieces, with the adjudicated range in [`docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md`](docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md). Its observed artifacts and source revision `b738aa1be1a62a9f9cdde89ced78558f04293a77` remain the exact v1 instrument of record. ### Accepted architecture and interaction decisions - A prompt carries mounted-lifetime invariants; a skill carries procedure and judgment for a recognizable job; a tool contract carries one executable operation's semantics and constraints. - Brunch core owns universal, context/domain/editor/formalism-independent elicitation semantics. A plugin pairs one reusable domain typology with one target formalism. The app is the directive-marked registration and host-composition shell. - The SDCPN plugin is an earned contribution bundle, not a symmetric inventory. It mounts one `sdcpn-modelling` job skill and packages core-authored universal elicitation as a lazy resource inside that skill. -- Packaged skill-composition Candidate B is selected. Frozen v3 showed independent core-skill activation at `0/3` versus packaged disclosure at `2/3` on the opening case, while both candidates restrained universal disclosure on construct-only and resolvable-review cases. The review pair remained non-discriminating. Keep B without claiming full behavioral validation; do not run v4 by momentum. +- Packaged skill-composition Candidate B is selected. Frozen v3 showed independent core-skill activation at `0/3` versus packaged disclosure at `2/3` on the opening case, while both candidates restrained universal disclosure on construct-only and resolvable-review cases. The review pair remained non-discriminating. Keep B without claiming full behavioral validation; do not run a fourth skill-composition campaign by momentum. - Ampcode is the conceptual basis. Retain the Five-Register domain-primary workpiece, one-authoritative-home locality, Flue-native feasibility, and explicit evidence levels for authored text, tool/schema acceptance, structural correspondence, and behavioral evidence. Do not create a third synthesis. -- The remaining v3 content repairs are fixed: strengthen review/revision routing; after required disclosure ask exactly one focused question when human knowledge is needed; and do not load the workpiece template before first creation or material revision. +- The remaining routing obligations are fixed by this contract but not yet behaviorally proved: strengthen review/revision routing; after required disclosure ask exactly one focused question when human knowledge is needed; and do not load the workpiece template before first creation or material revision. ## Imperative @@ -83,10 +79,10 @@ Observe all of the following: Do not design past these remaining evidence and owner gates: - Whether the exact candidate walkthrough exposes a substantive content repair. Any repair must be presented with its observed failure, smallest correction, and regression risk before editing and must rerun affected free gates. -- Whether the three-invocation v3 campaign yields the two valid workpieces needed to compare like-for-like with the latest flat-prompt controls without pretending to estimate universal performance. -- The owner-approved US$10 ceiling across candidate and grader calls; stop before exceeding it. +- Whether the proposed three-invocation v4 campaign yields the two valid workpieces needed to compare like-for-like with the latest flat-prompt controls without pretending to estimate universal performance. +- The paid ceiling for any v4 candidate and grader calls remains unapproved; freeze first, then obtain explicit owner authorization before each paid stage. - Which valid candidate workpiece is the strongest cold-readable Mission 5 handoff. Select only after independent reports and human comparative adjudication. -- Whether the accepted local/restricted visible witness exposes a product-boundary failure not visible in the headless campaign. Stop and repair the first real failed boundary rather than broadening into remote infrastructure. +- Whether a new local/restricted visible witness of the same final frozen instrument exposes a product-boundary failure not visible in the headless campaign. Stop and repair the first real failed boundary rather than broadening into remote infrastructure. ## Stop or reorient @@ -110,4 +106,4 @@ Stop and surface the evidence if: Mission 5 owns capture-backed review and the first visible evidence-backed “why” answer over the frozen prepared pair. Mission 6 owns automatic traceable projection into one meaningful live SDCPN region. Mission 7 owns bounded authorized reviewer revision and scoped net patching. Mission 8's deployment branch stopped after local application proof and retains the unresolved infrastructure/release gates. Mission 9 owns the eventual accepted optimisation handoff after its consumer contract exists. -The inferential observer, host/session continuity beyond the fixed local witness, compaction, voice, broad observability, simulated-conversation viewing, remote release, and public product choice remain in [`../../MISSION.next.md`](../../MISSION.next.md). No deferred item is implementation authority here. +The inferential observer, host/session continuity beyond the fixed local witness, compaction, voice, broad observability, simulated-conversation viewing, remote release, and public product choice remain in [`MISSION.next.md`](MISSION.next.md). No deferred item is implementation authority here. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md index 334732eb8af..02092c80197 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.next.md @@ -1,25 +1,25 @@ # Brunch future mission spine -> Canonical future-planning spine, shared frame, and backlog index only. This file is not execution authority and authorizes no implementation. No mission is live after Mission 4 close; re-evaluate one draft and create a new `MISSION.md` on its own issue, branch, and PR before acting. +> Canonical future-planning spine, shared frame, and backlog index only. This file is not execution authority and authorizes no implementation. [`MISSION.md`](MISSION.md) is the sole live authority. Detailed provisional clusters are context repositories, not missions; re-evaluate and convert one into `MISSION.md` before acting. This spine and its four linked drafts form one future-planning record. Keep each consequential meaning in one authoritative planning home: shared contracts and unallocated concerns live here; mission-specific detail lives in its draft. A spine pointer is not a second contract. Material omitted from a future cut returns to this record at full fidelity, and the consumed draft is removed. ## Current authority and accepted spine -Mission 4 closed on 2026-09-02. Its [archive](docs/mission-archive/4-accepted-prompt-skill-workpiece-architecture.md) and [Mission 5 handoff](docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/mission-5-handoff.md) freeze the selected workpiece, exact source Flue snapshot, candidate manifest, comparative adjudication, visible witness, and accepted limitations. The parallel deployment branch's decision to install Mission 8 as live authority remains historical to that branch and is **not imported here**. +Mission 4 remains live on this branch. Its exit handoff is a selected frozen workpiece, exact source Flue conversation, exact candidate-instrument manifest, and valid comparative evaluation/adjudication. The first v3 campaign and witness are historical failure evidence, not an accepted exit join. The parallel deployment branch's decision to archive Mission 4 and install Mission 8 as live authority remains historical to that branch and is **not imported here**. -Mission 5 is the next candidate, not a live mission. Re-evaluate its linked draft against the frozen handoff and current deployment reality before cutting separate execution authority. +Mission 5 is a future candidate, not a live mission. Re-evaluate its linked draft only after Mission 4 has produced and the owner has accepted its exit join. ```text -M4 closed — accepted prompt/skill/workpiece architecture, with explicit limitations -M5 next draft — capture-backed review over an honest prebuilt pair +M4 live — repair and prove the accepted prompt/skill/workpiece architecture +M5 future draft — capture-backed review over an honest prebuilt pair M6 automatic projection — ship one meaningful region of traceable live SDCPN projection M7 revision — ship bounded authorized reviewer revision and a scoped patch M8 deployment handoff — stopped after local application proof, before infrastructure deployment M9 optimisation — ship an accepted optimisation handoff after its consumer contract exists ``` -Every numbered mission from Mission 5 onward must produce a distinct visible advancement through the deployed Petrinaut/Brunch boundary once that boundary exists. Architecture, schema repair, fixtures, evaluation, rehearsal, and spikes may support that advancement but cannot be its sole outcome. Parallel work means separate issue, branch, PR, and mission authority; it never means multiple live missions here. +Every numbered mission from Mission 4 onward must produce a distinct visible advancement through the deployed Petrinaut/Brunch boundary once that boundary exists. Architecture, schema repair, fixtures, evaluation, rehearsal, and spikes may support that advancement but cannot be its sole outcome. Parallel work means separate issue, branch, PR, and mission authority; it never means multiple live missions here. ## FE-1476 product frame @@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ Do not rewrite Mission 3 as if all proof items passed. Its falsified provider-vi Selected paper hypothesis: **software behavior × Gherkin, Shape C**—a lightweight near-target behavior workpiece plus combined Gherkin authoring/checking. The workpiece holds purpose, rules, concrete context/event-or-action/outcome examples, terms, status, authorship, and open matters without mandatory Given/When/Then decomposition; target text can become a correction surface. Core owns universal epistemic conduct; plugin owns software behavior/Gherkin additions across Directives, Recognition, Operations, Coverage, Verification; grammar semantics come from authoritative Gherkin capability. -The paper design lives under `packages/core/_drafts/ampcode`. Local `packages/plugin-gherkin/plugin.yaml` is content-territory evidence from inactive generalized YAML machinery, not a Flue/parser/binding route. A read-only Oracle review independently selected Shape C; that agreement is design advice, not runtime evidence. +The retained paper instrument lives under [`evaluations/protocols/gherkin-shape-c-paper-v1/`](evaluations/protocols/gherkin-shape-c-paper-v1/protocol.md); its former temporary workbench is reconstructible at commit `5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1`. Local `packages/plugin-gherkin/plugin.yaml` is content-territory evidence from inactive generalized YAML machinery, not a Flue/parser/binding route. A read-only Oracle review independently selected Shape C; that agreement is design advice, not runtime evidence. Rejected **A** (mirror SDCPN's separate construction topology) overfits a distant/tool-mediated shape to near textual projection. Rejected **B** (`.feature` as workpiece and target) cannot honestly carry unsupported rules, authorship, current/proposed status, conflict, deferral, and unchecked binding without a hidden comments sidecar. Shape C reverses toward a less target-shaped workpiece if authorship laundering repeats, toward target text plus minimal open matters if transcription repeatedly has zero epistemic delta, or toward a separate checking phase if a real codebase step-binding capability earns it. @@ -289,7 +289,7 @@ Evidence ladder remains authored text → parser-valid text → step-definition- Candidate pairing is **software correctness obligations × Dafny specification modules/program contracts**. “Formal-verification use cases” is too target-neutral for a plugin; “verified state evolution × kernel contracts” overfits one repository. Supplied kernels are project context, not plugin ontology: `Model`/`Action`/`Inv`/`Valid`/`Apply`, `TryStep`, `Rebase`, `Candidates`, and `Explains` are recognition examples, never required decomposition. -The source prompt is [“From Intent to Proof: Dafny Verification for Web Apps”](http://midspiral.com/blog/from-intent-to-proof-dafny-verification-for-web-apps/). The Ampcode paper prototype records the pairing in its `core/SYSTEM.md` and `README.md` without Dafny plugin resources or production wiring. A read-only Oracle review selected this pairing over state-evolution and target-neutral alternatives; that remains design advice. +The source prompt is [“From Intent to Proof: Dafny Verification for Web Apps”](http://midspiral.com/blog/from-intent-to-proof-dafny-verification-for-web-apps/). The removed Ampcode workbench recorded the pairing without Dafny plugin resources or production wiring and is reconstructible at commit `5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1`; this section is the current authoritative planning account. A read-only Oracle review selected this pairing over state-evolution and target-neutral alternatives; that remains design advice. Recognition spans initialization/representation invariants; pre/post/frame conditions; preservation, rejection, unchanged-on-failure; history/trace/round-trip/determinism/idempotence; abstraction/refinement/simulation/normalization/intent preservation; termination/progress; and trusted boundaries. It is an open repertoire. A nonnegative invariant can miss stale-redo while history laws catch it; initialization plus preservation proves only the expressed invariant for reachable states. @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ The candidate split has one live authority, one compact spine, four provisional | Standing decisions | Shared constraints and standing locks | Retained with packaged-B disposition, authority boundaries, capture/workpiece separation, platform locks, and no generalized runtime/TUI. | | Structured-question semantics from accepted planning | Unallocated backlog / Structured-question vertical capability | Added to its sole planning home with the required model-to-resumed-turn proof and no `brunch_ask` reactivation. | -Material was removed only where the deployment branch's observed application artifact superseded its earlier proposal or where a spine summary now points to a detailed draft. All open consequences and re-entry conditions remain above. Mission 4 subsequently closed into its archive and frozen Mission 5 handoff; no future mission or remote deployment was promoted. +Material was removed only where the deployment branch's observed application artifact superseded its earlier proposal or where a spine summary now points to a detailed draft. All open consequences and re-entry conditions remain above. Mission 4 remains live; no future mission or remote deployment is promoted. ## Planning-split close record diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/README.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/README.md index 1d6ff194342..1dd2270816b 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/README.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/README.md @@ -3,10 +3,9 @@ Brunch is the stateful elicitation harness and package family at `libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent`. - [`AGENTS.md`](./AGENTS.md) is the agent charter. -- No mission is currently live. A branch with active implementation must install `MISSION.md` as - its sole execution authority. [`MISSION.next.md`](./MISSION.next.md) is the self-contained - canonical future spine and is not execution authority. Closed missions live under - [`docs/mission-archive/`](./docs/mission-archive/). +- [`MISSION.md`](./MISSION.md) is the current objective and stop conditions. + [`MISSION.next.md`](./MISSION.next.md) is the self-contained canonical future spine and is not + execution authority. Closed missions live under [`docs/mission-archive/`](./docs/mission-archive/). - [`CONTEXT.md`](./CONTEXT.md) defines the domain language. - [`docs/specs/`](./docs/specs/) and [`docs/adr/`](./docs/adr/) record the harness contract and prior design decisions (see [`docs/adr/README.md`](./docs/adr/README.md)). diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/decisions/mission-4-owner-gates-2026-09-02.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/decisions/mission-4-owner-gates-2026-09-02.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..727fc2b63d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/decisions/mission-4-owner-gates-2026-09-02.md @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +# Mission 4 owner-gate clarification + +Date: 2026-09-02 + +The owner confirmed in the Mission 4 repair session: + +> I did give those authorizations, but out of frustration with how long it was running. + +This confirmation applies to the prior US$10 paid ceiling, campaign acceptance, witness-only exact-URI repair, witness acceptance, and attempted closure. Those actions were historically authorized; they were not fabricated or unauthorized spend. + +The owner also directed that the builder's exercise and declaration of parent-reserved freeze, adjudication, witness acceptance, handoff selection, and closure “must be undone,” and that every spec failure identified by review “should be restored/repaired/re-done.” The previous acceptance and closure are therefore withdrawn. Mission 4 is live again. + +This record authorizes no new paid call, cost ceiling, freeze, campaign acceptance, witness acceptance, handoff selection, or closure. Those gates remain with the parent and owner under `MISSION.md`. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/EVALUATION.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/five-register-paper-comparison-v1/EVALUATION.md similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/EVALUATION.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/five-register-paper-comparison-v1/EVALUATION.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/five-register-paper-comparison-v1/README.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/five-register-paper-comparison-v1/README.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..551c0dce486 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/five-register-paper-comparison-v1/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +# Five-Register paper comparison v1 + +This directory preserves the evaluation and source map that selected the Five-Register workpiece shape before its useful parts were promoted into production. The moved documents retain historical path language; those paths describe the temporary workbench, not current files. + +Historical revisions: + +- stage 1: `bc032a4264a0529fe1a0ddc36348ea5a6bb33715` +- full losing-candidate snapshot: `2fb4c779a2dc16b786e9c357dec812e021873493` +- final selected draft base: `5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1` + +Current production authority lives under `packages/core/src/` and `packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/`. This archive is evidence of the decision, not an alternative implementation surface. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/five-register-paper-comparison-v1/SOURCE-MAP.md similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/SOURCE-MAP.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/five-register-paper-comparison-v1/SOURCE-MAP.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/evaluation/stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/five-register-paper-comparison-v1/evaluation/stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/evaluation/stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/five-register-paper-comparison-v1/evaluation/stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/evaluation/stage-2-owner-led-paper-walkthrough.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/five-register-paper-comparison-v1/evaluation/stage-2-owner-led-paper-walkthrough.md similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/evaluation/stage-2-owner-led-paper-walkthrough.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/five-register-paper-comparison-v1/evaluation/stage-2-owner-led-paper-walkthrough.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/campaign-adjudication.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/campaign-adjudication.md index 3f6d8a83cd8..fa9bfa40eb8 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/campaign-adjudication.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/campaign-adjudication.md @@ -1,64 +1,51 @@ -# Mission 4 architecture scoring v3 — campaign adjudication +# Mission 4 architecture scoring v3 — invalid campaign adjudication -## Verdict +## Status -The single valid Mission 4 architecture workpiece scored `72.5 / 100` omniscient and `3.2 / 4` cold, with conditional downstream readiness and no hard-failure gate. Against the latest two valid flat-prompt controls, its omniscient score lies inside their `66.3–80.0` range while its cold score is `0.1` below their `3.3–3.5` range. +This campaign is retained as historical failure evidence and does not satisfy Mission 4's frozen architecture scoring proof. It produced no valid campaign member and no complete independent cold review. The prior owner acceptance is withdrawn; Mission 4 is live again. -This is evidence that the new architecture can preserve meaning and epistemic state at least as well as the latest flat prompt on one observed workpiece. It is not evidence of general superiority: only one of three v3 invocations produced a workpiece, and that workpiece missed many load-bearing facts before the eight-turn stop. +The [owner-gate clarification](../../decisions/mission-4-owner-gates-2026-09-02.md) confirms that the paid calls were authorized under a US$10 ceiling and that the resulting campaign was initially accepted while the work was running. That authorization establishes that the calls were not unapproved spend. It does not make the builder the owner of freeze, adjudication, witness acceptance, handoff selection, or mission closure, and it does not authorize another paid call. -## Quality comparison +## Campaign validity -| Dimension | Architecture v3 | Flat prompt A | Flat prompt B | -| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | -| Objective-aligned acquisition | 3 | 3 | 2 | -| Semantic conservation | 4 | 3 | 3 | -| Epistemic and evidence fidelity | 4 | 4 | 3 | -| Gap and loss discipline | 4 | 3 | 3 | -| Cold IR utility, omniscient estimate | 3 | 3 | 2 | -| Conversation quality and burden | 3 | 3 | 3 | -| Weighted total | 72.5 | 80.0 | 66.3 | -| Independent cold utility | 3.2 | 3.5 | 3.3 | -| Readiness | conditional | conditional | conditional | -| Hard-failure gates | none | none | none | +| Replication | Observed outcome | Mission 4 validity | Operational attribution | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | +| 1 | Completed after eight turns and emitted a recoverable workpiece | Invalid: created the workpiece without first reading `templates/workpiece.md` | Candidate path completed but violated the required routing order | +| 2 | Simulated expert returned no text with provider `stop_reason: refusal` | Invalid | Expert-simulator/provider boundary | +| 3 | Simulated expert returned no text after mixed refusal/end-turn responses | Invalid | Expert-simulator/provider boundary | -Do not average the control members or turn the architecture point estimate into a range. The strongest observed architectural change is the `4` in semantic conservation and gap/loss discipline: the workpiece preserved hedges and uncertainty and deposited thirteen construction blockers without fabrication, silent hardening, conflict collapse, unsupported completion, opening overload, or schema-shaped questioning. +The runner recorded `violations: []` for replication 1 because `ordinaryElicitationViolationsFrom()` checked forbidden tools and resources but did not enforce required resource presence or ordering. The checker cannot narrow the mission contract. Replication 1 violated the explicit requirement that the workpiece template be read before first creation, so this campaign's valid completion rate is `0/3`, not `1/3`. -The principal weakness remains acquisition. The omniscient grader found major misses in shared changeover-crew contention, the VW-02 exception, family-specific bottlenecks, customer lateness practice, stage overlap, Line 2's family-dependent speed, and minimum-run constraints. Reader effort also remained weaker than both flat-prompt controls because related facts were repeated or scattered. +The campaign therefore supports no baseline-competitive, superiority, readiness, or Mission 5 selection claim. Its traces remain useful for diagnosing routing and acquisition failures. -## Campaign membership and failure attribution +## Arithmetic errata -| Replication | Outcome | Quality use | Operational attribution | -| --- | --- | --- | --- | -| 1 | Completed after eight turns; recoverable workpiece | Omniscient and cold scored | Candidate path completed | -| 2 | Simulated expert returned no text with provider `stop_reason: refusal` | Excluded | Expert-simulator/provider boundary | -| 3 | Simulated expert returned no text after several mixed refusal/end-turn responses | Excluded | Expert-simulator/provider boundary | +The retained omniscient report supplied dimension scores `3, 4, 4, 4, 3, 3` with weights `20, 20, 20, 15, 15, 10`. Its listed contributions sum to `88.75`, which rounds under the frozen one-decimal rule to **88.8 / 100**, not `72.5 / 100`. -The v3 completion rate is `1/3`, versus the flat-prompt control's `2/3`. Report that observation separately from workpiece quality. It does not establish that the candidate interviewer failed, because both invalid members stopped at the independent simulated-expert boundary; it does establish that this paid evaluation setup is not a robust source of gradeable samples. +The retained cold attempt 2 supplied scores `4.0, 3.5, 3.0, 4.0, 3.5, 2.5`. Their mean is `20.5 / 6 = 3.4167`, which rounds to **3.4 / 4**, not `3.2 / 4`. -The completed member read universal and SDCPN elicitation references but did not read `templates/workpiece.md` before producing its workpiece. That violates the accepted lifecycle instruction and Mission 4 routing oracle even though the v3 runner's declared ordinary-path checks did not classify it as invalid. Preserve it as an owner-visible architecture finding; do not retroactively alter member validity or the frozen instrument. +Those corrected values would place the observed workpiece above the flat-prompt omniscient range `66.3–80.0` and within its cold range `3.3–3.5`. They remain diagnostic only because the workpiece was produced by an oracle-invalid run and the cold reviewer did not complete its contract. -## Independent reports +The model-authored `.omniscient.md`, `.cold.md`, and `.cold-attempt-2.md` files are retained as received and therefore still contain their arithmetic errors. This adjudication is their explicit erratum; no consumer may quote their headline totals without this correction. -The omniscient grader completed normally using requested model `claude-sonnet-4-5`, observed model `claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929`, and the frozen prompt, situation pack, ledger, exact transcript, and workpiece. +## Incomplete independent oracle -The cold reviewer was invoked twice in separate fresh contexts with the same frozen prompt, opening request, and workpiece. Both independently returned `3.2`, `conditional`, and high confidence, but the provider ended both with `stop_reason: refusal`. Attempt 1 stopped after the reconstructed model; attempt 2 supplied the complete score vector and almost all required sections before truncating in the final limitation. Treat `3.2` as a stable human-adjudicated score supported by two agreeing but formally incomplete provider reports, not as a fully completed cold-review oracle. +Both cold-review calls ended with provider `stop_reason: refusal`. Attempt 1 stopped after the reconstructed model. Attempt 2 supplied the score vector and most requested sections but stopped during the final limitation. Agreement between two incomplete outputs does not complete the frozen reviewer contract. Mission 4 still requires one complete independent cold review or an owner-approved replacement oracle. -## Artifact integrity +## Quality observations, not acceptance -The first commit's pre-commit hook normalized whitespace in the previously untracked replication-1 JSON. The emitted outer file hash was `8b47844cd690e13e468ad2aaef27eef0e86f40c23ca82357703931aaaf189de6`; the canonical committed hash is `2bfcf9e60a15e2014b17afede0258865b784cca205ca6a7709d4dbba20a86c66`. Parsed content and every embedded campaign, workpiece, source-message, instrument, snapshot, call, and transcript field are unchanged. This is a disclosed outer-byte-integrity defect and prevents a claim that the committed JSON is byte-for-byte runner output. +The invalid replication 1 workpiece preserved hedges and uncertainty and deposited thirteen construction blockers without obvious fabrication, silent hardening, conflict collapse, unsupported completion, opening overload, or schema-shaped questioning. The omniscient grader also found major acquisition misses in shared changeover-crew contention, the VW-02 exception, family-specific bottlenecks, customer lateness practice, stage overlap, Line 2's family-dependent speed, and minimum-run constraints. Related facts were repeated or scattered, increasing cold-reader effort. + +These observations may inform the routing repair and later adjudication. They are not a scored campaign result. + +## Artifact integrity -## Runtime and budget +The first commit's pre-commit hook normalized whitespace in the previously untracked replication-1 JSON. The emitted outer file hash was `8b47844cd690e13e468ad2aaef27eef0e86f40c23ca82357703931aaaf189de6`; the canonical committed hash is `2bfcf9e60a15e2014b17afede0258865b784cca205ca6a7709d4dbba20a86c66`. Parsed content and every embedded campaign, workpiece, source-message, instrument, snapshot, call, and transcript field are unchanged. This prevents a claim that the committed JSON is byte-for-byte runner output. -Across the two observed campaigns, recorded interviewer cost is `$0.5829`. Simulated-expert usage totals 67,315 input and 5,194 output tokens. Grader usage totals 39,312 input and 9,779 output tokens. Expert, grader, and one-token preflight prices were not emitted by their SDK responses, so the artifact set cannot state exact total spend; observed usage remains comfortably below the owner-approved US$10 ceiling under the configured model's ordinary published rates. +## Runtime and historical budget -## Human adjudication +Across the two observed campaigns, recorded interviewer cost is `$0.5829`. Simulated-expert usage totals 67,315 input and 5,194 output tokens. Grader usage totals 39,312 input and 9,779 output tokens. Expert, grader, and one-token preflight prices were not emitted by their SDK responses, so the artifact set cannot state exact total spend. These were historically authorized calls; no remaining budget or new authorization is implied. -The owner accepted this architecture as baseline-competitive with explicit limitations and directed Mission 4 to proceed to the visible witness and handoff without another paid scoring campaign. +## Required successor evidence -- Accept the architecture workpiece as a pass with no hard-failure gate. -- Accept `72.5` as inside, not above, the latest flat-prompt omniscient range. -- Accept `3.2` as slightly below the latest flat-prompt cold range and formally qualified by reviewer truncation. -- Credit stronger observed conservation and gap discipline. -- Do not claim general quality improvement, robustness, or objective-credible readiness. -- Carry the template-disclosure miss and acquisition misses as explicit limitations requiring owner disposition before Mission 4 close. -- If selected for Mission 5, hand off replication 1 with its exact conversation, instrument manifest, reports, and this adjudication. +Before Mission 4 can claim this proof leaf, the parent must freeze the final repaired production instrument, explicitly authorize any paid call and ceiling, execute a campaign whose validity oracle enforces required disclosure and ordering, obtain one complete independent cold review, adjudicate the result, and select a Mission 5 handoff. Campaign and visible witness must exercise that same frozen instrument unless the owner explicitly amends the contract before either run. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/mission-5-handoff.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/mission-5-handoff.md deleted file mode 100644 index 65aaca9bc79..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/mission-5-handoff.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,54 +0,0 @@ -# Mission 5 input handoff - -Status: **frozen Mission 4 exit join** - -## Selected workpiece and source - -Selected run: -`prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006` - -The selected workpiece is the only valid and independently scored v3 member. It is not represented as the best member of an estimated candidate range. - -| Artifact | SHA-256 | -| --- | --- | -| Canonical committed run record, Flue snapshot, transcript, model calls, instrument manifest, and workpiece binding: `prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.json` | `2bfcf9e60a15e2014b17afede0258865b784cca205ca6a7709d4dbba20a86c66` | -| Selected Markdown workpiece: `prospective-runbook-v3-replication-1-2026-09-02T11-41-53-281Z-3b64f006.ir.md` | `f4bb30244671c5d7a983a937536bb11035201a37d6cc197e60a275e26dae58c5` | -| Omniscient report | `b37f7ed8403a0018b53c4c0c5784c3bf9c2c4fa843bedadf936127670f86ca27` | -| Omniscient request/model metadata | `cc497b1ed3872dc69dca3d5bdf3b8f1fe36fef4bd1b023112481412de32cb43e` | -| Cold review attempt 2 | `8086d4b48ec41ec62c4a25a897db40286b83c500ea054452f020595d445ba1ba` | -| Cold review attempt 2 request/model metadata | `c4e910cbd91d72e16107b21974e82b7b2218626d1ca1c4567c236bc9e5191804` | -| Campaign adjudication | `4020f188c7280009dc48a8b6ece8b8dcaa225d04dedb04bda08116c6d5375c2e` | -| Local/restricted product witness | `88addf723973e02ccdbe7c96e4c16180c46458a7b6983ad1647de9c69e281496` | - -The raw record binds the workpiece to: - -- source commit `794fe2fbf1eaeba3fc816c6e3d1755d7b444125d`; -- campaign fingerprint `e93d1fd6b23a38b12201dee967c1b65e58b7c3d5724f57f1bedeb9413d9b76e1`; -- workpiece content hash `99e4e201cdb4959c114495049e68d7f4d18bdc5c41a5b1d958001b4027fbe355`; -- source Flue message `entry_01M1GZ1BQQ6Y1SBS51E3K1W0NE`; -- source-message hash `42d1d9b7de99f143ed85c57dd3f09dcc166c55bf3e3c409a0607ec360d54dcf5`; -- requested interviewer and simulated-expert model `claude-sonnet-4-5`; -- provider-observed simulated-expert model `claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929`. - -Use the JSON snapshot as the canonical source conversation. The readable `.md` transcript is a projection. - -Artifact caveat: the runner-emitted JSON had SHA-256 `8b47844cd690e13e468ad2aaef27eef0e86f40c23ca82357703931aaaf189de6`. The repository pre-commit formatter normalized JSON whitespace before the artifact's first commit, producing the canonical committed hash above. Parsed content, embedded workpiece/source hashes, campaign fingerprint, calls, snapshot, and transcript are unchanged. Treat this as a disclosed outer-byte-integrity defect; do not claim the committed JSON is byte-for-byte runner output. - -## Comparative disposition - -- Omniscient score: `72.5 / 100`, inside the latest valid flat-prompt range `66.3–80.0`. -- Cold utility: human-adjudicated `3.2 / 4`, slightly below the flat-prompt range `3.3–3.5`; both cold attempts were provider-truncated with `stop_reason: refusal`. -- Downstream readiness: `conditional`. -- Hard-failure gates: none. -- Owner disposition: accepted as baseline-competitive with explicit limitations, without a general-superiority claim or another paid scoring campaign. - -## Remaining gaps carried into Mission 5 - -1. The selected paid run read universal and profile references but did not read the workpiece template before first creation. -2. The post-campaign visible witness initially used relative resource labels and failed. The owner-authorized exact-URI instruction repair succeeded for the template on rerun, but that rerun did not read universal/profile guidance before its initial substantive question. -3. Acquisition remained the main quality weakness: shared changeover-crew contention, the VW-02 exception, family-specific bottlenecks, practiced lateness hierarchy, stage overlap, family-dependent speed, and minimum-run constraints remained missing. -4. Only one candidate workpiece was gradeable; two v3 members failed at the simulated-expert/provider boundary. -5. No honest prebuilt non-empty SDCPN or derivation fixture is included in this handoff. Mission 5 must prepare and label that pair without implying Mission 4 automatically projected it. -6. The source conversation was not compacted. Any successor relying on it must declare uncompacted-history dependence or prove recovery across actual Flue compaction. - -Mission 5 may close a named gap while preparing the honest pair, but it must not launder one into projection rationale or claim that the post-repair production prompt was the scored instrument. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/product-witness.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/product-witness.md index 665cae4c70d..48f4b8d52d5 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/product-witness.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/product-witness.md @@ -1,8 +1,14 @@ -# Mission 4 local/restricted product witness +# Mission 4 local/restricted product witness — invalid attempt -## Verdict +## Status -The repaired local Petrinaut panel crossed the accepted visible boundary: +This witness is retained as historical product-boundary failure evidence. It does not satisfy Mission 4's routing or same-frozen-instrument proof, and its prior owner acceptance is withdrawn. + +The [owner-gate clarification](../../decisions/mission-4-owner-gates-2026-09-02.md) confirms that the witness-only exact-URI repair and the original witness acceptance were authorized while the work was running. That historical authorization does not delegate witness acceptance or closure to a builder and does not authorize another witness or a post-freeze repair. + +## Boundary exercised + +The repaired local Petrinaut panel crossed: ```text real Petrinaut panel :4915 @@ -14,32 +20,27 @@ real Petrinaut panel :4915 → visible runbook-ir workpiece ``` -This is a local/restricted product witness, not a remote deployment. - -The owner accepted the scored architecture with explicit limitations and authorized a witness-only repair after the first panel run exposed incorrect resource invocation. No post-repair paid campaign or quality claim is made. +This was a local/restricted product attempt, not a remote deployment. -## Initial failures and repair +## Initial failures and authorized repair The first browser launch rendered blank. Browser evidence showed a Petrinaut `Maximum update depth exceeded` failure from a stale package bundle. Rebuilding `@hashintel/petrinaut-core` and `@hashintel/petrinaut` with their installed Vite 8.2.2, then rebuilding the website, restored the tracked panel without source changes. -The first visible conversation then activated `sdcpn-modelling` but passed relative labels to `read_skill_resource`: +The first visible conversation activated `sdcpn-modelling` but passed relative labels to `read_skill_resource`: - `templates/workpiece.md` - `references/universal-elicitation.md` Flue rejected both because packaged skill files require the exact advertised URI. The agent continued without the resources and emitted a workpiece that mislabeled an inferred current state as expert evidence. -The owner authorized the smallest repair: the skill now tells the model to pass the exact `/.flue/packaged-skills/...` URI shown after `→`, never the logical label. Focused package, application build, and production-routing tests passed before the rerun. +The owner authorized the smallest repair: instruct the model to pass the exact `/.flue/packaged-skills/...` URI advertised after `→`, never the logical label. Focused package, application build, and production-routing tests passed before the rerun. -## Repaired visible interaction +## Repaired interaction Conversation id: `ec5c509f-4a93-4327-9c50-25b0f26b8fb5` -Local principal: browser-local UUID retained only to identify this witness Application route: `http://127.0.0.1:4915/api/chat` proxied to `http://127.0.0.1:4322/api/chat` -The user supplied a bounded scheduling case: Line 2 had just finished white; a Meridian white was expected in roughly two hours; a tint was ready; white-to-tint and tint-to-white estimates were 45 minutes and three hours. The assistant activated the skill and asked one focused question about whether a tint run could be interrupted. The user answered that it must finish and cannot be abandoned without disallowed scrap, then requested the recoverable workpiece without net construction. - -The production trace showed: +The user supplied a bounded scheduling case. The assistant activated the skill, asked one focused question about whether a tint run could be interrupted, received the answer, and emitted a visible epistemically marked workpiece without mounting or using construction tools. | Operation | Outcome | | --- | --- | @@ -49,16 +50,22 @@ The production trace showed: | Construction tools | Not used or mounted | | Net mutation | None | -The workpiece visibly separated expert evidence, working account, assumptions, checks, not-yet-asked material, two case paths, a cross-cutting issue ledger, consequential gaps, and net status. - -## Honest limitation +## Why this witness is invalid -The exact-URI repair worked for first workpiece creation. The assistant still did not read `references/universal-elicitation.md` and `references/profile.md` before its initial substantive question, despite the lifecycle instruction. This repeats the scored candidate's disclosure-restraint finding. Under the owner's accepted-limited disposition it remains an explicit limitation, not a hidden pass or a reason to claim general architecture superiority. +1. The assistant did not read `references/universal-elicitation.md` and `references/profile.md` before its substantive question, violating the complementary required-disclosure half of the routing oracle. +2. The exact-URI instruction repair occurred after the paid campaign's frozen source commit `794fe2fbf1eaeba3fc816c6e3d1755d7b444125d`, so this witness and the scored campaign did not exercise one exact frozen instrument. +3. The screenshots prove that the real panel rendered and displayed a Brunch response/workpiece, but they do not independently bind the proxy path, Flue conversation, skill activation, resource URI, or absence of construction tools to the visible interaction. +4. Raw Playwright snapshots and console output remain only in the ignored local `.playwright-cli/` scratch directory. They are not committed evidence and may be deleted by local cleanup. -## Retained visual evidence +## Retained visual artifacts -- `product-witness-initial.png` — blank first launch before rebuilding stale Petrinaut package output. +- `product-witness-initial.png` — blank first launch before rebuilding stale Petrinaut output. +- `product-witness-rebuilt.png` — restored panel before interaction. - `product-witness-workpiece.png` — first visible workpiece with failed relative resource calls. -- `product-witness-repaired.png` — repaired exact-URI run with the workpiece visible in the real panel. +- `product-witness-repaired.png` — exact-URI rerun with the workpiece visible. + +These images are historical diagnostics, not accepted witness proof. + +## Required successor witness -`product-witness-rebuilt.png` is the restored panel before the interaction. +After the parent freezes the final repaired instrument and any required campaign succeeds, exercise that exact instrument through the visible Petrinaut boundary. Retain enough raw trace to bind the browser interaction to the proxy route, Flue conversation, skill activation, ordered resource reads, absence of construction capabilities, and visible workpiece. The parent then presents that evidence to the owner for acceptance; the witness runner does not accept or close it. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-legacy-baseline/condition-5-turn-latency.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-legacy-baseline/condition-5-turn-latency.md index ef484917c09..e0f1f58c037 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-legacy-baseline/condition-5-turn-latency.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-legacy-baseline/condition-5-turn-latency.md @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ > [folded store](transcripts/cycle-1/condition-5-captures.json)). Commissioned by Lu after the read-out > showed 2.4 minutes per interviewer turn: "not going to be viable at all, for a working > application". Inputs: the raw record's per-turn tool calls, signals, sweep results, and usage -> totals; the runner [`harness-run.ts`](../../../../evaluations/protocols/legacy-baseline/harness-run.ts); +> totals; the historical runner `b59b323bf1b26eee9a2345a8412ca466f5d6e851:libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/legacy-baseline/harness-run.ts`; > `packages/core/src/sweep-protocol.ts`; `packages/binding-flue`'s sweep and settlement path; the > Flue `OperationOptions`, `turn` event, and `DurabilityConfig` types in `node_modules/flue`. > Status: **evidence and recommendation, not authority** — nothing here changes a spec, a key, or diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/implementations/mission-4-close.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/implementations/mission-4-close.md deleted file mode 100644 index 5fec1b51fad..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/implementations/mission-4-close.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,84 +0,0 @@ -# Mission 4 close record - -Closed: 2026-09-02 -Issue: [FE-1563](https://linear.app/hash/issue/FE-1563/redesign-the-elicitation-runbook-and-workpiece-against-the-frozen) - -## Accepted result - -Mission 4 promoted the owner-selected compact core prompt, SDCPN append, one `defineSkill`-assembled `sdcpn-modelling` skill, core-authored universal elicitation resource, SDCPN profile, Five-Register workpiece, construction guidance, and evidence-level checks into the production Flue `ChatAgent`. - -The owner accepted the architecture as baseline-competitive with explicit limitations. No claim of universal superiority, remote deployment, automatic projection, durable capture, or complete process acquisition is made. - -## Comparative evidence - -The v3 architecture campaign compared only with the latest two valid flat-prompt controls. - -- Candidate: omniscient `72.5 / 100`, cold `3.2 / 4`, conditional readiness, no hard-failure gate. -- Flat prompt: omniscient range `66.3–80.0`, cold range `3.3–3.5`, conditional readiness, no hard-failure gates. -- Candidate strengths: semantic conservation and gap/loss discipline. -- Candidate weaknesses: acquisition coverage, reader effort, one gradeable member out of three. -- Runtime failures: two simulated-expert/provider refusals, reported separately from quality. -- Cold review: two fresh contexts agreed on `3.2`, but both were provider-truncated with `stop_reason: refusal`. - -Evidence: - -- [`../evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/campaign-adjudication.md`](../evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/campaign-adjudication.md) -- [`../evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/mission-5-handoff.md`](../evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/mission-5-handoff.md) - -## Visible product witness - -The accepted local/restricted boundary crossed: - -```text -Petrinaut panel → same-origin /api/chat → AI SDK transport -→ production Flue ChatAgent → sdcpn-modelling skill → visible runbook-ir -``` - -The first launch exposed stale Petrinaut build output. A correct Vite 8.2.2 package rebuild restored the panel without source changes. The first conversation then exposed relative `read_skill_resource` labels failing against Flue's packaged-resource URI contract. The owner authorized a one-line exact-advertised-URI instruction repair. The rerun activated the skill, successfully read the advertised workpiece-template URI, asked one focused question, rendered an epistemically marked workpiece, and did not mount or call construction tools. - -The rerun still did not read universal/profile references before its initial substantive question. That accepted limitation remains explicit. - -Evidence: [`../evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/product-witness.md`](../evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/product-witness.md). - -## Mission 5 join - -The frozen handoff selects v3 replication 1 and binds: - -- exact raw Flue snapshot and readable transcript; -- selected workpiece and source-message hashes; -- exact source commit, campaign fingerprint, requested/observed models, and instrument manifest; -- omniscient and cold reports plus request metadata; -- comparative and human adjudication; -- visible-witness evidence and residual gaps. - -Mission 5 remains a draft. It must prepare and honestly label a non-empty prebuilt SDCPN and derivation fixture; none is implied by Mission 4. - -## Planning and deployment disposition - -- Mission 4 moved to `docs/mission-archive/`. -- No root `MISSION.md` remains and no successor implementation is authorized. -- `MISSION.next.md` and all four future drafts preserve the accepted M5–M9 spine. -- Content-free Flue OTel instrumentation remains in current application source. -- Mission 5 retains only latency/tool tracing needs; hosted OTLP, propagation, failure attributes, and remote telemetry remain Mission 8 release gates. -- No remote deployment or public release is claimed. - -## Verification - -Observed passing checks during close: - -- core, SDCPN plugin, and application production builds; -- application and package TypeScript checks; -- application and package Oxlint checks with only pre-existing warnings; -- repository format check before immutable campaign output was retained, plus a final scoped format check over every changed source/manifest file; -- full application unit suite: 18 files, 86 tests; -- focused SDCPN skill and production routing tests after the URI repair; -- clean post-commit hermetic v3 campaign proof before paid execution; -- real browser witness through the tracked Petrinaut panel. - -The repository's root Turborepo build could not invoke Petrinaut-core's workspace-local Vite binary because its executable link was absent. Direct execution of the installed pinned Vite 8.2.2 built Petrinaut-core and Petrinaut successfully; the website then built normally. - -The final pre-commit formatter normalized outer whitespace in the previously untracked raw v3 campaign JSON before its first commit. The emitted and canonical committed hashes, unchanged parsed content, and resulting outer-byte-integrity limitation are recorded in the adjudication and Mission 5 handoff. All changed source and manifest files pass the formatter; untracked `.playwright-cli` browser scratch remains outside the commit. - -## Pull-request record - -No GitHub pull request exists for branch `ln/fe-xxxx-re-oracle-runbooks` at close time, so there was no PR description to update. This file is the retained close record; any later PR must link it and preserve the accepted limitations above. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-archive/README.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-archive/README.md index 226003771fd..e49040eb656 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-archive/README.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-archive/README.md @@ -6,4 +6,3 @@ Closed `MISSION.md` files, moved here on close or explicit owner-directed branch - [`2-mechanical-capture-sweep.md`](2-mechanical-capture-sweep.md) — Mission 2, accepted 2026-08-27. - [`3-structurally-typed-runbook-to-headless-pn.md`](3-structurally-typed-runbook-to-headless-pn.md) — Mission 3, closed 2026-08-31 with the runbook/workpiece path accepted and real-model construction falsified on the exercised route. - [`4-owner-led-runbook-and-workpiece-redesign.md`](4-owner-led-runbook-and-workpiece-redesign.md) — Mission 4, closed for branch transition by owner direction on 2026-09-01; this archive does not independently adjudicate every proof item. -- [`4-accepted-prompt-skill-workpiece-architecture.md`](4-accepted-prompt-skill-workpiece-architecture.md) — Mission 4, accepted 2026-09-02 as baseline-competitive with explicit quality, routing, and campaign limitations. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/5-capture-backed-review.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/5-capture-backed-review.md index 4ca63db1a99..fb27a272d76 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/5-capture-backed-review.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/5-capture-backed-review.md @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ A fresh builder must resolve the current repository and the deployment handoff rather than treating this draft as a specification: -- [`../mission-archive/4-accepted-prompt-skill-workpiece-architecture.md`](../mission-archive/4-accepted-prompt-skill-workpiece-architecture.md) and [`../evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/mission-5-handoff.md`](../evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/mission-5-handoff.md) — accepted Mission 4 authority, selected frozen workpiece, exact source Flue snapshot, candidate instrument manifest, comparative adjudication, visible witness, and carried limitations. +- [`../../MISSION.md`](../../MISSION.md) — sole execution authority; consume a selected frozen Mission 4 workpiece, exact source Flue conversation, candidate instrument manifest, and comparative adjudication only after Mission 4 has validly produced and the owner has accepted them. - [`../../MISSION.next.md`](../../MISSION.next.md) — compact future spine, FE-1476 product frame, shared proof obligations, standing locks, and any later evidence admitted after this draft was written. - [`../mission-archive/2-mechanical-capture-sweep.md`](../mission-archive/2-mechanical-capture-sweep.md) — accepted mechanical capture throughline, exact close evidence, empty-payload boundary, conversation identity, and carried flags. - [`../mission-archive/3-structurally-typed-runbook-to-headless-pn.md`](../mission-archive/3-structurally-typed-runbook-to-headless-pn.md) and [`../evidence/implementations/fe-1525-headless-runbook-pn.md`](../evidence/implementations/fe-1525-headless-runbook-pn.md) — accepted runbook/workpiece leg, falsified real-model construction leg, and the distinction between a hermetic non-empty fixture and vacuous empty-net parser success. @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ A fresh builder must resolve the current repository and the deployment handoff r - On that branch, inspect `apps/brunch-agent/src/db.ts`, `src/postgres.ts`, `src/database-config.ts`, `test/postgres.test.ts`, `test/database-config.test.ts`, and `test/container-smoke.integration.ts`. Mission 5 activates capture as product data and therefore must use a durable implementation at the claimed replacement boundary; task-local JSON is not an admissible deployed capture store. - [`../../../petrinaut/docs/ai-assistant.md`](../../../petrinaut/docs/ai-assistant.md) and the other Petrinaut user-guide pages that mention the affected panel flow. Any user-visible change requires same-change documentation and a prompt to replace screenshots if they become stale. -The selected workpiece and source conversation are frozen in the Mission 5 handoff above. An honest prebuilt non-empty SDCPN and derivation fixture still have no canonical paths; they remain Mission 5 preparation obligations, not names to invent here. +The selected workpiece, source conversation, prebuilt SDCPN, and derivation fixture do not yet have honest canonical paths. They are Mission 4 exit and Mission 5 preparation obligations, not names to invent here. ## Visible product advance @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ Do not carry selected-pair provenance breadth, capture durability, owner refusal | Panel executes client tools and resumes one turn through AI SDK | Existing `apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.test.ts` plus `libs/@hashintel/petrinaut/src/ui/views/Editor/panels/ai-assistant-panel.test.tsx`, test `adds one dynamic output and sends one automatic follow-up`. Run `yarn workspace @apps/brunch-agent test:unit` and `yarn workspace @hashintel/petrinaut test:unit --run`. | | Mission 3 workpiece is recoverable and cold-readable; empty paid net is semantically false | Existing `docs/evidence/implementations/fe-1525-headless-runbook-pn.md` and `docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md`; artifact inspection is the oracle. | | Mission 8 application contract is locally verified but remote replacement remains open | `157730cc5a214dd9c543e8d95c7193a219c48aef:libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/implementations/mission-8-deployment-handoff.md`: exact recorded commands include `yarn workspace @apps/brunch-agent lint:tsc`, `lint:eslint`, `test:unit`, `build`, `build:docker`, and `turbo run test:unit --filter='@hashintel/brunch-agent...'`, plus native arm64, explicit `linux/amd64`, and Docker/Postgres/collector smoke. The handoff explicitly is not remote proof. | -| Selected Mission 4 workpiece, exact conversation, manifest, and adjudication are accepted | Closed by `vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/mission-5-handoff.md`: one selected pre-repair scored workpiece, canonical raw snapshot, source-message binding, instrument manifest, comparative reports/adjudication, owner acceptance, and explicit routing/sample limitations. | +| Selected Mission 4 workpiece, exact conversation, manifest, and adjudication are accepted | **ORACLE GAP:** Mission 4 is live. Resolve by naming its final frozen candidate paths and recording owner acceptance/adjudication before this draft can be cut. | | Every consequential element in the selected prebuilt pair has a derivation or explicit unsupported disposition | **ORACLE GAP:** no selected pair or inventory exists. Resolve with a frozen element inventory mechanically compared with the derivation fixture and human inspection of every unsupported disposition. | | One typed name/id yields an evidence-grounded answer and broken link yields visible refusal in deployed panel | **ORACLE GAP:** no existing test or deployed witness exercises this operation. At cut time bind it to the exact production-path test and a human panel witness; do not count a server-only fixture. | | Capture/workpiece/derivation survive the actual claimed replacement boundary | **ORACLE GAP:** deployment branch stopped before remote task replacement and left capture inactive. Resolve with one immutable image, selected durable store, process restart and cross-host replacement inspection against the same ids. | @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ Do not carry selected-pair provenance breadth, capture durability, owner refusal ## Inputs and joins -- **Mission 4 exit join:** consume `vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/mission-5-handoff.md` and its hashed selected artifacts. Preserve the distinction between the scored pre-repair instrument and the owner-authorized post-campaign URI instruction repair; carry the missing-template/reference disclosure and acquisition gaps rather than laundering them into derivation rationale. +- **Mission 4 exit join:** selected final frozen Markdown workpiece, exact source Flue conversation/range, exact candidate instrument manifest, valid comparative evaluation/adjudication, and any smallest remaining workpiece gap. Join fails if these are merely branch-tip files without a frozen identity or if campaign and witness exercised different instruments. - **Mission 2 join:** explicit `applyCaptureSweep`-style harness operation, evidence archive, capture idempotency, owner key, and no interviewer scheduling. Reuse mechanics only after inspecting current contracts; do not revive generalized typed elicitation. - **Prebuilt fixture join:** identified preparer, stable net element ids, current workpiece references, capture evidence references, projection rationale, and explicit unsupported dispositions. The pair must be non-empty and semantically inspectable. - **Mission 8 join:** consume the landed application contract and the open infrastructure handoff accurately. Mission 5 must add durable capture/product-state scope before claiming replacement durability, then join to actual ECS/RDS/collector/ingress identity supplied by infrastructure. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/6-traceable-projection.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/6-traceable-projection.md index b4a36bf137b..5bd7e01a05a 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/6-traceable-projection.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/6-traceable-projection.md @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ A fresh builder must resolve these authorities and evidence before choosing a mechanism: -- [`../mission-archive/4-accepted-prompt-skill-workpiece-architecture.md`](../mission-archive/4-accepted-prompt-skill-workpiece-architecture.md) and [`../evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/mission-5-handoff.md`](../evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/mission-5-handoff.md) — accepted Mission 4 architecture and exact successor join. Mission 6 may be cut only after Mission 5 has closed its accepted join. +- [`../../MISSION.md`](../../MISSION.md) — sole execution authority. Mission 6 may be cut only after Mission 4 and Mission 5 have validly closed their accepted joins. - [`../../MISSION.next.md`](../../MISSION.next.md) — compact future spine, FE-1476 floor, cross-mission obligations, standing locks, and current Mission 7 handoff. - [`5-capture-backed-review.md`](5-capture-backed-review.md) — provisional predecessor contract. At cut time replace assumptions with Mission 5's accepted archive/evidence and exact current workpiece/derivation seam. - [`../mission-archive/3-structurally-typed-runbook-to-headless-pn.md`](../mission-archive/3-structurally-typed-runbook-to-headless-pn.md) and [`../evidence/implementations/fe-1525-headless-runbook-pn.md`](../evidence/implementations/fe-1525-headless-runbook-pn.md) — accepted workpiece leg, canonical callback fixture, provider-visible nested-schema failure, vacuous empty-net result, and explicit next-boundary decision. @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ A fresh builder must resolve these authorities and evidence before choosing a me - [`../../../petrinaut-core/src/ai.ts`](../../../petrinaut-core/src/ai.ts), [`../../../petrinaut-core/src/action-schemas.ts`](../../../petrinaut-core/src/action-schemas.ts), [`../../../petrinaut-core/src/schemas/entity-schemas.ts`](../../../petrinaut-core/src/schemas/entity-schemas.ts), and [`../../../petrinaut-core/src/ai.test.ts`](../../../petrinaut-core/src/ai.test.ts) — canonical Petrinaut AI schemas, mutation callbacks, ids, nested types, and JSON Schema evidence. These are the authority; Brunch prose or copied field catalogs are not. - [`../../../petrinaut/src/ui/views/Editor/panels/ai-assistant-panel.tsx`](../../../petrinaut/src/ui/views/Editor/panels/ai-assistant-panel.tsx) and [`../../../petrinaut/src/ui/views/Editor/panels/ai-assistant-panel.test.tsx`](../../../petrinaut/src/ui/views/Editor/panels/ai-assistant-panel.test.tsx) — current `useChat` / `onToolCall`, canonical input parsing, mutation execution, diagnostics sequencing, dynamic interactive tools, and visible failure surface. - [`apps/brunch-agent/src/http/petrinaut-chat.ts`](../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/src/http/petrinaut-chat.ts), [`apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/client-tools.ts`](../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/client-tools.ts), and [`apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.test.ts`](../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/test/petrinaut-chat.test.ts) — real panel-to-Flue transport and browser callback resume. -- [`../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md), its construction/check resources, and the exact accepted Mission 4 candidate versions — target-formalism guidance and current workpiece contract. Do not treat historical branch-tip resources as the frozen Mission 4 instrument. +- [`../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md), [`../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md`](../../packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md), their construction/check resources, and the eventual exact accepted Mission 4 candidate versions — target-formalism guidance and current workpiece contract. Do not treat historical branch-tip resources as the frozen Mission 4 instrument. - Commit `157730cc5a214dd9c543e8d95c7193a219c48aef` on deployment branch `ln/fe-1569-brunch-agent-deployment`, read with `git show`, especially `libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/implementations/mission-8-deployment-handoff.md`, plus its `MISSION.md`, application persistence/telemetry files, and open infrastructure gates. Mission 6 consumes the actual deployed contract inherited through Mission 5; it must not imply the branch achieved remote deployment. - [`../../../petrinaut/docs/ai-assistant.md`](../../../petrinaut/docs/ai-assistant.md), [`../../../petrinaut/docs/drawing-a-net.md`](../../../petrinaut/docs/drawing-a-net.md), and affected simulation/formalism guidance. User-visible projection behavior must update the user guide and prompt screenshot replacement where applicable. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md index 1219d32f953..992856a4d9a 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ A fresh builder must read these sources before cutting or implementing this cluster: -- [`../mission-archive/4-accepted-prompt-skill-workpiece-architecture.md`](../mission-archive/4-accepted-prompt-skill-workpiece-architecture.md) and [`../evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/mission-5-handoff.md`](../evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/mission-5-handoff.md) — accepted Mission 4 workpiece decisions, exact selected artifact, and carried limitations. +- [`MISSION.md`](../../MISSION.md) — sole execution authority and the current Mission 4 workpiece decisions. Consume its exit join only after valid close evidence and owner acceptance exist. - [`MISSION.next.md`](../../MISSION.next.md) — compact shared frame, standing locks, and current mission joins. - [`README.md`](README.md) — durable draft authority, lifecycle, conversion, and oracle-gap rules. - [`docs/mission-archive/2-mechanical-capture-sweep.md`](../mission-archive/2-mechanical-capture-sweep.md) — exact-evidence capture, idempotency, Flue-history authority, and model-free scheduling. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/9-optimisation-handoff.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/9-optimisation-handoff.md index a90476b838a..e9ad3159b81 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/9-optimisation-handoff.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/9-optimisation-handoff.md @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ A fresh builder must read these durable sources before deepening this cluster: -- [`../mission-archive/4-accepted-prompt-skill-workpiece-architecture.md`](../mission-archive/4-accepted-prompt-skill-workpiece-architecture.md) and the eventual accepted Mission 5–7 archives — inherited authority; this draft creates no live mission. +- [`../../MISSION.md`](../../MISSION.md) — sole execution authority until Mission 4 validly closes; the eventual accepted Mission 4–7 archives become inherited authority. - [`../../MISSION.next.md`](../../MISSION.next.md) and [`README.md`](README.md) — shared frame, standing locks, draft authority, and lifecycle. - [`7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md`](7-bounded-reviewer-revision.md) and the eventual accepted Mission 5–7 close evidence — inherited real-path artifacts and proof. Draft promises are not join evidence. - [`../mission-archive/3-structurally-typed-runbook-to-headless-pn.md`](../mission-archive/3-structurally-typed-runbook-to-headless-pn.md) — accepted workpiece leg, falsified real-model construction, and the parser-valid-empty warning. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/README.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/README.md index 4c78eb00629..0106040bd3d 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/README.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/mission-drafts/README.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # Provisional mission drafts -Files in this directory are detailed context repositories for possible future missions. They are not execution authority, do not create live missions, and must not be implemented. No mission is currently live; [`MISSION.next.md`](../../MISSION.next.md) is the compact future spine. A draft must be re-evaluated and converted into a new root `MISSION.md` on its own issue, branch, and PR before implementation. +Files in this directory are detailed context repositories for possible future missions. They are not execution authority, do not create live missions, and must not be implemented. [`MISSION.md`](../../MISSION.md) is the sole execution authority; [`MISSION.next.md`](../../MISSION.next.md) is the compact future spine. A draft must be re-evaluated and converted into a new root `MISSION.md` on its own issue, branch, and PR before implementation. Each planning item has one authoritative planning home across `MISSION.next.md` and these linked drafts. A spine summary is only a pointer. Keep accepted decisions, rejected alternatives and reasons, re-entry conditions, scenario classes, evidence, constraints, fog, stop conditions, risks, assumptions, and named mechanisms in one discoverable home at the precision needed by a cold-start builder. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/README.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/README.md index 3ca0e1a4abb..df0eb2b99f1 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/README.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/README.md @@ -14,7 +14,9 @@ Current process-model-elicitation assets: - `cases/vestera-scheduling/` — the Vestera case. - `oracles/vestera-scheduling/` — case-specific retrospective and prospective ledgers. - `oracles/ir-quality-ruler-v1.md` — frozen general IR-quality ruler. -- `protocols/prospective-runbook-v1/` — the frozen prospective baseline, run with `yarn workspace @apps/brunch-agent runbook:elicit`. +- `protocols/prospective-runbook-v1/` — frozen executed Mission 3 control; its runner was retired after evidence capture. +- `protocols/prospective-runbook-v2/` and `protocols/prospective-runbook-v3/` — frozen failed/invalid Mission 4 attempts with archival source-resolution sidecars; do not rerun. +- `protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/` — proposed repaired Mission 4 campaign; no paid execution is authorized until parent freeze and a new owner-approved ceiling. - `protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1/` — the independent omniscient and cold-review procedures. - `protocols/legacy-baseline/` — retained historical instrument; do not use it for new runs. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/ARCHIVE.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/ARCHIVE.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..3d24e02c3c1 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/ARCHIVE.md @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +# Archived source resolution + +This frozen protocol retains the path names used when it ran. The temporary workbench was later removed after its decisions were promoted. + +Resolve historical source paths at base revision `5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1`, for example: + +```text +5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1:libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md +``` + +Because the executed worktree was dirty, the exact instrument is defined by `docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v1/manifest.json` and its retained run records. Do not rewrite the protocol, manifest, or run JSON to current paths. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/ARCHIVE.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/ARCHIVE.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..c50657d944a --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/ARCHIVE.md @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +# Archived source resolution + +This frozen protocol inherits the path names used by v1. The temporary workbench was later removed after its decisions were promoted. + +Resolve historical source paths at base revision `5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1`, for example: + +```text +5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1:libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md +``` + +Because the executed worktree was dirty, the exact instrument is defined by `docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v2/manifest.json` and its retained run records. Do not rewrite the protocol, manifest, or run JSON to current paths. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/ARCHIVE.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/ARCHIVE.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e5e81169bd3 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/ARCHIVE.md @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +# Archived source resolution + +This frozen protocol retains the path names used when it ran. The temporary workbench was later removed after its decisions were promoted. + +Resolve historical source paths at base revision `5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1`, for example: + +```text +5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1:libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/core/universal-elicitation.md +``` + +Because the executed worktree was dirty, the exact instrument is defined by `docs/evidence/evaluations/flue-skill-composition-side-quest-v3/manifest.json` and its retained run records. Do not rewrite the protocol, manifest, or run JSON to current paths. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin/APPEND_SYSTEM.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/gherkin-shape-c-paper-v1/instrument/APPEND_SYSTEM.md similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin/APPEND_SYSTEM.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/gherkin-shape-c-paper-v1/instrument/APPEND_SYSTEM.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin/gherkin-specification/SKILL.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/gherkin-shape-c-paper-v1/instrument/gherkin-specification/SKILL.md similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin/gherkin-specification/SKILL.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/gherkin-shape-c-paper-v1/instrument/gherkin-specification/SKILL.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin/gherkin-specification/gherkin-authoring-and-checks.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/gherkin-shape-c-paper-v1/instrument/gherkin-specification/gherkin-authoring-and-checks.md similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin/gherkin-specification/gherkin-authoring-and-checks.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/gherkin-shape-c-paper-v1/instrument/gherkin-specification/gherkin-authoring-and-checks.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin/gherkin-specification/gherkin-elicitation.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/gherkin-shape-c-paper-v1/instrument/gherkin-specification/gherkin-elicitation.md similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin/gherkin-specification/gherkin-elicitation.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/gherkin-shape-c-paper-v1/instrument/gherkin-specification/gherkin-elicitation.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin/gherkin-specification/workpiece-template.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/gherkin-shape-c-paper-v1/instrument/gherkin-specification/workpiece-template.md similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin/gherkin-specification/workpiece-template.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/gherkin-shape-c-paper-v1/instrument/gherkin-specification/workpiece-template.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/gherkin-shape-c-paper-v1/protocol.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/gherkin-shape-c-paper-v1/protocol.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..64c5b06961f --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/gherkin-shape-c-paper-v1/protocol.md @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +# Gherkin Shape C paper instrument v1 + +Status: retained design instrument; not production or execution authority. + +This protocol preserves the selected paper hypothesis for software behavior × Gherkin after the temporary Ampcode workbench was removed. It contains no runner and proves no Flue route, parser acceptance, step-definition binding, runtime execution, or behavioral adequacy. + +Instrument files are under [`instrument/`](instrument/). They were relocated without content changes from `packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-gherkin/`. The historical workbench is reconstructible at commit `5249a73f09977ad2ef007e08de7b7314f94568e1`. + +Any future campaign must define a new protocol and freeze the exact production candidate independently rather than treating this paper instrument as landed behavior. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/legacy-baseline/harness-run.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/legacy-baseline/harness-run.ts deleted file mode 100644 index 2023319a9d8..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/legacy-baseline/harness-run.ts +++ /dev/null @@ -1,954 +0,0 @@ -/** - * Baseline condition 5 — the harness in the loop. - * - * The same simulated expert, probes, and turn budget as conditions 1–4, but - * the interviewer is the shipped SDCPN elicitor running in the Flue runtime - * with the binding's machinery: the `ask` suspension, the settlement nudge, - * the private `sweep` extraction into the capture store, and the harness's - * computed completion. The runner plays the expert and the clock. It reads - * every harness fact from durable history and the capture store, never - * interpolates into the interviewer's instructions, and needs no delivery - * classifier: the deliverable is the capture store, folded, and the - * interviewer ends its own turn-taking by replying without a question. - * - * This is the JS-API workflow pattern the Flue routing table names for a loop - * that drives an agent through turns: `start()`, then `send()`/`wait()`/ - * `history()` through the SDK client over the app's own router. - * - * This retained historical runner has no supported operator command. Restore it only through - * an explicitly scoped historical investigation. - * - * Environment: - * - * ANTHROPIC_API_KEY both models (pi-ai reads it for the interviewer) - * BRUNCH_SDCPN_MODEL interviewer model id; this runner defaults it to claude-opus-5 - * BRUNCH_BASELINE_ANTHROPIC_MODULE test-only stand-in for the expert's Anthropic client - * BRUNCH_BASELINE_INTERVIEWER_PROVIDER_MODULE test-only pi provider module (default export) for the interviewer - * BRUNCH_BASELINE_HARD_STOP positive interviewer-turn limit; defaults to 24 - * BRUNCH_BASELINE_OUTPUT_DIR optional run-specific production output directory - * BRUNCH_BASELINE_TEST_OUTPUT_DIR test-only output directory; requires both stand-ins - * - * Artifacts (beside the other conditions' transcripts unless the test directory is set): - * - * condition-5.md the readable transcript, harness facts interleaved - * condition-5.raw.json every turn record, the Flue history snapshot, the store, and usage - * condition-5-model.md the capture store folded into the elicited model, with the completion report - * condition-5-captures.json the capture-store snapshot verbatim - * condition-5-system.md the interviewer's instructions, reconstructed with the binding's own functions - * condition-5.timings.jsonl each observed Flue model call, tagged by interviewer-turn purpose - */ - -import { - appendFile, - cp, - mkdir, - mkdtemp, - readFile, - rm, - writeFile, -} from "node:fs/promises"; -import { tmpdir } from "node:os"; -import { join } from "node:path"; -import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url"; - -import { observe } from "@flue/runtime"; -import { start } from "@flue/runtime/node"; -import { - createFlueClient, - type FlueConversationMessage, - type FlueConversationSnapshot, -} from "@flue/sdk"; - -import { - askProtocolInstructionFragments, - buildCompletionCueSignal, - buildSweepList, - completionDemands, - evaluateCompletion, - foldElicitedModel, - pendingAskAffordanceId, - renderInstructions, - settlementProtocolInstructionFragments, - toolName, - type CaptureStoreSnapshot, - type CompletionReport, - type ElicitedModel, - type SlotState, -} from "@hashintel/brunch-agent"; -import { - createLocalCaptureStore, - projectFlueHistoryForSweep, -} from "@hashintel/brunch-agent-binding-flue"; -import { sdcpn, sdcpnDefinition } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-sdcpn"; -import { repertoire } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent/prompts"; - -import { - createTurnTimingRecorder, - type TurnTimingPurpose, - type TurnTimingRecord, -} from "./turn-timing.ts"; - -import type Anthropic from "@anthropic-ai/sdk"; -import type { Provider } from "@earendil-works/pi-ai"; - -// --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -// Protocol constants — identical to conditions 1, 2, and 4 (run.ts). -// --------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -const CONDITION = "5"; -const EXPERT_MODEL = "claude-sonnet-5"; -const DEFAULT_INTERVIEWER_MODEL = "claude-opus-5"; -const FORCE_WRAP_AT = 20; -const DEFAULT_HARD_STOP_AT = 24; -const IMPATIENCE_AT = 8; -const IMPATIENCE_LINE = - "(Sorry — I've just seen the time, I have the floor huddle in ten minutes. How much more do you need?)"; -const FORCED_WRAP_MESSAGE = - "I really do have to stop here. Please produce the model now with everything you have."; -/** Consecutive interviewer turns without a question, before the wrap, that end the run. */ -const STALL_AFTER_TURNS_WITHOUT_ASK = 3; -const EXPERT_MAX_TOKENS = 1_500; - -// --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -// Environment and stand-ins. -// --------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -const outputDirectory = process.env["BRUNCH_BASELINE_OUTPUT_DIR"]; -const testOutputDirectory = process.env["BRUNCH_BASELINE_TEST_OUTPUT_DIR"]; -const expertClientModule = process.env["BRUNCH_BASELINE_ANTHROPIC_MODULE"]; -const interviewerProviderModule = - process.env["BRUNCH_BASELINE_INTERVIEWER_PROVIDER_MODULE"]; -const apiKey = process.env["ANTHROPIC_API_KEY"]; -const configuredHardStop = process.env["BRUNCH_BASELINE_HARD_STOP"]; -const hardStopAt = - configuredHardStop === undefined - ? DEFAULT_HARD_STOP_AT - : Number(configuredHardStop); - -if (!Number.isSafeInteger(hardStopAt) || hardStopAt <= 0) { - throw new Error("BRUNCH_BASELINE_HARD_STOP must be a positive integer"); -} - -if (testOutputDirectory && !(expertClientModule && interviewerProviderModule)) { - console.error( - "BRUNCH_BASELINE_TEST_OUTPUT_DIR requires BRUNCH_BASELINE_ANTHROPIC_MODULE and BRUNCH_BASELINE_INTERVIEWER_PROVIDER_MODULE", - ); - process.exit(1); -} -if (!apiKey && !(expertClientModule && interviewerProviderModule)) { - console.error("ANTHROPIC_API_KEY is not set"); - process.exit(1); -} - -// The elicitor pins its model at module load, so the override must be in the -// environment before the agent module is imported (below, dynamically). -process.env["BRUNCH_SDCPN_MODEL"] ||= DEFAULT_INTERVIEWER_MODEL; -const interviewerModel = process.env["BRUNCH_SDCPN_MODEL"]; - -// The capture store lands in a run-private directory; the snapshot is copied -// out as an artifact at the end. Set before the agent's first render. -const targetDocumentDirectory = await mkdtemp( - join(tmpdir(), "brunch-baseline-c5-"), -); -process.env["BRUNCH_DEV_TARGET_DOCUMENT_DIR"] = targetDocumentDirectory; - -const caseDir = fileURLToPath( - new URL("../../cases/vestera-scheduling/", import.meta.url), -); -const transcriptDir = - testOutputDirectory ?? - outputDirectory ?? - fileURLToPath( - new URL( - "../../../docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-legacy-baseline/transcripts/", - import.meta.url, - ), - ); -await mkdir(transcriptDir, { recursive: true }); -const timingsPath = join(transcriptDir, `condition-${CONDITION}.timings.jsonl`); -await writeFile(timingsPath, ""); - -// --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -// Records. -// --------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -interface ExpertMessage { - readonly role: "user" | "assistant"; - readonly content: string; -} - -interface Usage { - input: number; - output: number; - cacheRead: number; - cacheWrite: number; - calls: number; -} - -export interface HarnessSweepRecord { - readonly status: string; - readonly appliedCaptureIds?: readonly string[]; - readonly skippedDedupKeys?: readonly string[]; - readonly advisories?: readonly unknown[]; - readonly refusal?: unknown; - readonly completion?: unknown; -} - -export interface HarnessCompletionRecord { - readonly captures: number; - readonly complete: boolean; - readonly unsatisfied: number; - readonly outsideSlice: number; - readonly unmapped: number; - readonly revision: string; - readonly cue: string; -} - -export interface HarnessTurnRecord { - readonly turn: number; - /** Assistant text parts, in order, across every response in the turn. */ - readonly text: readonly string[]; - readonly asks: readonly { - readonly question: string; - readonly toolCallId: string; - readonly rejected?: string; - }[]; - readonly sweeps: readonly HarnessSweepRecord[]; - readonly signals: readonly { - readonly tagName: string; - readonly excerpt: string; - }[]; - readonly toolErrors: readonly { - readonly toolName: string; - readonly errorText: string; - }[]; - readonly settlement?: "failed" | "aborted"; - /** The one question left open for the expert, if any. */ - readonly pendingQuestion?: string; - /** Flue model-call timings observed while this interviewer turn ran. */ - readonly timings: readonly TurnTimingRecord[]; - /** The harness's read-time completion over the capture store after this turn. */ - readonly completion: HarnessCompletionRecord; - /** What the expert was then sent: their reply, or a stimulus. */ - readonly expert?: { - readonly content: string; - readonly stimulus?: string; - readonly truncated?: boolean; - }; -} - -export interface HarnessRunRecord { - readonly startedAt: string; - readonly condition: typeof CONDITION; - readonly interviewerModel: string; - readonly expertModel: string; - readonly conversationId: string; - readonly stopReason: string; - readonly turns: readonly HarnessTurnRecord[]; - readonly timings: readonly TurnTimingRecord[]; - readonly usage: { readonly interviewer: Usage; readonly expert: Usage }; - readonly history: FlueConversationSnapshot; - readonly store: CaptureStoreSnapshot; -} - -// --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -// The expert (unchanged from run.ts: same model, same pack, thinking off). -// --------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -interface BaselineAnthropicClient { - messages: { - create( - request: Anthropic.MessageCreateParamsNonStreaming, - ): Promise; - }; -} - -let anthropic: BaselineAnthropicClient | undefined; -async function getAnthropic(): Promise { - if (anthropic) return anthropic; - anthropic = expertClientModule - ? ((await import(expertClientModule)).default as BaselineAnthropicClient) - : (new (await import("@anthropic-ai/sdk")).default({ - apiKey, - maxRetries: 5, - timeout: 30 * 60 * 1000, - }) as BaselineAnthropicClient); - return anthropic; -} - -const expertUsage: Usage = { - input: 0, - output: 0, - cacheRead: 0, - cacheWrite: 0, - calls: 0, -}; - -async function callExpert( - system: string, - messages: readonly ExpertMessage[], -): Promise<{ text: string; truncated: boolean }> { - let tokenBudget = EXPERT_MAX_TOKENS; - for (let attempt = 1; attempt <= 5; attempt++) { - const response = await ( - await getAnthropic() - ).messages.create({ - model: EXPERT_MODEL, - max_tokens: tokenBudget, - thinking: { type: "disabled" }, - system, - messages: messages.map((message) => ({ ...message })), - }); - expertUsage.calls += 1; - expertUsage.input += response.usage.input_tokens; - expertUsage.output += response.usage.output_tokens; - expertUsage.cacheRead += response.usage.cache_read_input_tokens ?? 0; - expertUsage.cacheWrite += response.usage.cache_creation_input_tokens ?? 0; - const text = response.content - .filter((block) => block.type === "text") - .map((block) => block.text) - .join("\n"); - if (text.trim() === "") { - tokenBudget *= 2; - console.error( - ` expert: empty text, retrying with max_tokens=${tokenBudget}`, - ); - continue; - } - return { text, truncated: response.stop_reason === "max_tokens" }; - } - throw new Error("expert: exhausted retries"); -} - -// --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -// Reading harness facts out of durable history and the store. -// --------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -const ASK_TOOL = toolName("ask"); -const SWEEP_TOOL = toolName("sweep"); - -const excerpt = (text: string, length = 240): string => - text.length > length ? `${text.slice(0, length)}…` : text; - -const questionOf = (output: unknown): string | undefined => - typeof output === "object" && - output !== null && - "payload" in output && - typeof output.payload === "object" && - output.payload !== null && - "question" in output.payload && - typeof output.payload.question === "string" - ? output.payload.question - : undefined; - -const sweepRecordOf = (output: unknown): HarnessSweepRecord => { - const record = ( - typeof output === "object" && output !== null ? output : {} - ) as Record; - return { - status: typeof record["status"] === "string" ? record["status"] : "unknown", - ...(Array.isArray(record["appliedCaptureIds"]) - ? { appliedCaptureIds: record["appliedCaptureIds"] as string[] } - : {}), - ...(Array.isArray(record["skippedDedupKeys"]) - ? { skippedDedupKeys: record["skippedDedupKeys"] as string[] } - : {}), - ...(Array.isArray(record["advisories"]) - ? { advisories: record["advisories"] as unknown[] } - : {}), - ...("refusal" in record ? { refusal: record["refusal"] } : {}), - ...("completion" in record ? { completion: record["completion"] } : {}), - }; -}; - -/** Everything the interviewer did between two of our dispatches. */ -function readTurn( - messages: readonly FlueConversationMessage[], -): Omit< - HarnessTurnRecord, - "turn" | "completion" | "pendingQuestion" | "timings" -> { - const text: string[] = []; - const asks: HarnessTurnRecord["asks"][number][] = []; - const sweeps: HarnessSweepRecord[] = []; - const signals: HarnessTurnRecord["signals"][number][] = []; - const toolErrors: HarnessTurnRecord["toolErrors"][number][] = []; - let settlement: HarnessTurnRecord["settlement"]; - for (const message of messages) { - if (message.settlement) settlement = message.settlement.outcome; - if (message.role === "system") { - const tagName = message.signal?.tagName ?? message.purpose; - const body = message.parts - .flatMap((part) => (part.type === "text" ? [part.text] : [])) - .join(""); - signals.push({ tagName, excerpt: excerpt(body) }); - continue; - } - if (message.role !== "assistant") continue; - for (const part of message.parts) { - if (part.type === "text") { - if (part.text.trim().length > 0) text.push(part.text); - continue; - } - if (part.type !== "dynamic-tool") continue; - if (part.toolName === ASK_TOOL) { - const input = part.input as { question?: unknown } | undefined; - const question = - (part.state === "output-available" && questionOf(part.output)) || - (typeof input?.question === "string" ? input.question : ""); - asks.push({ - question, - toolCallId: part.toolCallId, - ...(part.state === "output-error" - ? { rejected: part.errorText } - : {}), - }); - } else if (part.toolName === SWEEP_TOOL) { - if (part.state === "output-available") { - sweeps.push(sweepRecordOf(part.output)); - } else if (part.state === "output-error") { - toolErrors.push({ - toolName: part.toolName, - errorText: part.errorText, - }); - } - } else if (part.state === "output-error") { - toolErrors.push({ toolName: part.toolName, errorText: part.errorText }); - } - } - } - return { - text, - asks, - sweeps, - signals, - toolErrors, - ...(settlement === undefined ? {} : { settlement }), - }; -} - -const demands = completionDemands(sdcpnDefinition); - -function readCompletion(store: CaptureStoreSnapshot): { - model: ElicitedModel; - report: CompletionReport; - record: HarnessCompletionRecord; -} { - const model = foldElicitedModel(store, sdcpnDefinition); - const report = evaluateCompletion(model, demands); - const sweepList = buildSweepList(model, report, sdcpnDefinition.patterns); - return { - model, - report, - record: { - captures: model.activeCaptureIds.size, - complete: report.complete, - unsatisfied: report.failures.length, - outsideSlice: report.outsideSlice.length, - unmapped: model.unmapped.length, - revision: report.revision, - cue: buildCompletionCueSignal(model, report, sweepList).body, - }, - }; -} - -// --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -// Rendering. -// --------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -const yesNo = (value: boolean): string => (value ? "yes" : "no"); - -function renderSlot(slot: SlotState): string { - switch (slot.state) { - case "value": - return `${JSON.stringify(slot.value)} — ${slot.precision}, ${slot.status}${ - slot.sourceRegime ? `, ${slot.sourceRegime}` : "" - }${slot.evidenced ? "" : ", unevidenced"}${ - slot.rationale ? ` — _${slot.rationale}_` : "" - }`; - case "absence": - return `absence: ${slot.absence}${slot.pointer ? ` → ${slot.pointer}` : ""} (${slot.status})`; - case "conflict": - return `conflict — ${slot.readings.length} readings`; - case "divergence": - return `divergence — prescribed ${JSON.stringify( - slot.prescribed.assertion.assertion, - )}; practiced ${JSON.stringify(slot.practiced.assertion.assertion)}`; - } -} - -function renderModel( - model: ElicitedModel, - report: CompletionReport, - completion: HarnessCompletionRecord, -): string { - const lines: string[] = [ - "# Condition 5 — the elicited model, folded from the capture store", - "", - "The harness's own deliverable: `foldElicitedModel` over the active captures, then", - "`evaluateCompletion` against the sdcpn definition. Nothing here was written by the", - "interviewer; every value is a capture the sweep extracted and the store admitted.", - "", - `- Plugin version: \`${model.pluginVersion}\``, - `- Revision: \`${model.revision}\``, - `- Active captures: ${completion.captures}`, - `- Complete: **${yesNo(report.complete)}** — ${report.failures.length} unsatisfied, ${report.outsideSlice.length} node(s) outside every objective's slice, ${model.unmapped.length} unmapped capture(s)`, - "", - "## Nodes", - ]; - const order = new Map( - sdcpnDefinition.kinds.map((row, index) => [row.kind, index] as const), - ); - const byKind = new Map(); - for (const node of model.nodes) { - const list = byKind.get(node.kind) ?? []; - list.push(node); - byKind.set(node.kind, list); - } - const kinds = [...byKind.keys()].sort( - (a, b) => (order.get(a) ?? 99) - (order.get(b) ?? 99), - ); - if (kinds.length === 0) lines.push("", "_No nodes._"); - for (const kind of kinds) { - const nodes = byKind.get(kind)!; - lines.push("", `### ${kind} (${nodes.length})`); - for (const node of nodes) { - lines.push("", `#### \`${node.id}\``); - for (const [slot, state] of Object.entries(node.slots)) { - lines.push(`- **${slot}** — ${renderSlot(state)}`); - } - } - } - lines.push("", "## Completion report", ""); - if (report.failures.length === 0) lines.push("_No unsatisfied demands._"); - for (const failure of report.failures) { - lines.push( - `- [${failure.diagnostic}] ${failure.message}${ - failure.nodeId - ? ` (\`${failure.nodeId}\`${failure.slot ? ` — ${failure.slot}` : ""})` - : "" - }`, - ); - } - if (report.outsideSlice.length > 0) { - lines.push("", "## Outside every objective's slice", ""); - for (const node of report.outsideSlice) { - lines.push(`- \`${node.nodeId}\` — ${node.open.length} open`); - } - } - if (model.unmapped.length > 0) { - lines.push("", "## Unmapped captures", ""); - for (const unmapped of model.unmapped) { - lines.push(`- \`${unmapped.captureId}\` — ${unmapped.reason}`); - } - } - lines.push( - "", - "## The harness's cue at close", - "", - "```", - completion.cue, - "```", - ); - return `${lines.join("\n")}\n`; -} - -const formatUsage = (usage: Usage): string => - `${usage.input} in (+${usage.cacheWrite} cache write, +${usage.cacheRead} cache read) / ${usage.output} out across ${usage.calls} calls`; - -const formatPurposeTiming = ( - timings: readonly TurnTimingRecord[], - purpose: TurnTimingPurpose, -): string => { - const matchingTimings = timings.filter( - (timing) => timing.purpose === purpose, - ); - if (matchingTimings.length === 0) return "—"; - const durationMs = matchingTimings.reduce( - (total, timing) => total + timing.durationMs, - 0, - ); - return `${durationMs} ms (${matchingTimings.length} call${matchingTimings.length === 1 ? "" : "s"})`; -}; - -function renderTranscript( - run: HarnessRunRecord, - openingMessage: string, - sweepTally: { applied: number; refused: number; noRange: number }, -): string { - const last = run.turns.at(-1)?.completion; - const header = [ - "# Baseline control — condition 5 (the harness in the loop)", - "", - `- Run started: ${run.startedAt}`, - `- Interviewer: ${run.interviewerModel} as the shipped SDCPN elicitor in the Flue runtime — binding-flue's ask, settlement nudge, sweep, fold, and completion (instructions reconstructed in condition-5-system.md)`, - `- Simulated expert: ${run.expertModel} + situation-pack.md`, - `- Interviewer turns: ${run.turns.length} (impatience probe at ${IMPATIENCE_AT}, forced wrap at ${FORCE_WRAP_AT}, hard stop ${hardStopAt})`, - `- Stop reason: ${run.stopReason}`, - last === undefined - ? "- Harness at close: no turn completed" - : `- Harness at close: ${last.captures} active captures; complete ${yesNo(last.complete)}; ${last.unsatisfied} unsatisfied; ${last.unmapped} unmapped; sweeps applied ${sweepTally.applied}, refused ${sweepTally.refused}, no settled range ${sweepTally.noRange}`, - `- Tokens: interviewer ${formatUsage(run.usage.interviewer)}; expert ${formatUsage(run.usage.expert)}`, - "", - "Harness facts are set off as `> harness —` lines: tool calls the interviewer made, signals the", - "harness appended, and the read-time completion over the capture store after each turn. The", - "expert never sees them.", - "", - "---", - "**Opening message**:", - "", - openingMessage, - ]; - const body = run.turns.map((turn) => { - const parts: string[] = [ - "---", - "", - `**Interviewer — turn ${turn.turn}** | interview ${formatPurposeTiming(turn.timings, "interview")} | sweep ${formatPurposeTiming(turn.timings, "sweep")} | repair ${formatPurposeTiming(turn.timings, "repair")}`, - "", - ]; - if (turn.text.length === 0 && turn.asks.length === 0) { - parts.push("_(no visible text this turn)_"); - } - parts.push(...turn.text.flatMap((text) => [text, ""])); - for (const signal of turn.signals) { - parts.push( - `> harness — signal \`${signal.tagName}\`: ${signal.excerpt.replaceAll("\n", " ")}`, - ); - } - for (const sweep of turn.sweeps) { - const completion = sweep.completion as - | { complete?: boolean; unsatisfied?: number } - | undefined; - parts.push( - `> harness — sweep ${sweep.status}${ - sweep.appliedCaptureIds - ? `; applied ${sweep.appliedCaptureIds.length}` - : "" - }${sweep.skippedDedupKeys?.length ? `; skipped ${sweep.skippedDedupKeys.length}` : ""}${ - sweep.advisories?.length - ? `; advisories ${sweep.advisories.length}` - : "" - }${sweep.refusal ? `; refusal ${JSON.stringify(sweep.refusal)}` : ""}${ - completion - ? `; completion complete=${yesNo(completion.complete === true)} unsatisfied=${completion.unsatisfied ?? "?"}` - : "" - }`, - ); - } - for (const error of turn.toolErrors) { - parts.push( - `> harness — tool error \`${error.toolName}\`: ${error.errorText}`, - ); - } - for (const ask of turn.asks.filter((candidate) => candidate.rejected)) { - parts.push( - `> harness — ask rejected: ${ask.rejected} (question: ${excerpt(ask.question, 120)})`, - ); - } - if (turn.settlement) - parts.push(`> harness — submission ${turn.settlement}`); - parts.push( - `> harness — completion after turn ${turn.turn}: ${turn.completion.captures} captures; complete ${yesNo(turn.completion.complete)}; ${turn.completion.unsatisfied} unsatisfied; ${turn.completion.unmapped} unmapped`, - ); - if (turn.pendingQuestion !== undefined) { - parts.push("", "**Ask**:", "", turn.pendingQuestion); - } - if (turn.expert) { - parts.push("", "---", ""); - if ( - turn.expert.stimulus && - turn.expert.content === turn.expert.stimulus - ) { - parts.push( - "**Injected experiment stimulus (not expert evidence)**:", - "", - turn.expert.stimulus, - ); - } else { - parts.push( - "**Expert (Marta)**:", - "", - turn.expert.content, - ...(turn.expert.stimulus - ? [ - "", - "**Injected experiment stimulus (not expert evidence)**:", - "", - turn.expert.stimulus, - ] - : []), - ...(turn.expert.truncated - ? ["", "_(expert reply truncated at its token budget)_"] - : []), - ); - } - } - parts.push(""); - return parts.join("\n"); - }); - return `${[...header, "", ...body].join("\n")}`; -} - -// --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -// The run. -// --------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -const startedAt = new Date().toISOString(); -const situationPack = await readFile(`${caseDir}situation-pack.md`, "utf8"); -const openingRaw = await readFile(`${caseDir}opening-message.md`, "utf8"); -const openingSeparator = openingRaw.indexOf("\n---\n"); -const openingMessage = ( - openingSeparator === -1 ? openingRaw : openingRaw.slice(openingSeparator + 5) -).trim(); - -// The app modules are imported after the environment is set: the elicitor -// reads its model id and the target-document directory at module load. -const [ - { SdcpnElicitor }, - { default: app }, - { SDCPN_AGENT_ROUTE }, - { targetDocumentPath }, -] = await Promise.all([ - import("../../../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/sdcpn-elicitor.ts"), - import("../../../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/src/app.ts"), - import("../../../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/src/routes.ts"), - import("../../../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/src/target-document-path.ts"), -]); - -const provider: Provider = interviewerProviderModule - ? ((await import(interviewerProviderModule)).default as Provider) - : ( - await import("@earendil-works/pi-ai/providers/anthropic") - ).anthropicProvider(); - -const interviewerUsage: Usage = { - input: 0, - output: 0, - cacheRead: 0, - cacheWrite: 0, - calls: 0, -}; -const turnTimingRecorder = createTurnTimingRecorder(); -const stopObserving = observe((event) => { - turnTimingRecorder.observe(event); - if (event.type !== "turn") return; - interviewerUsage.calls += 1; - const usage = event.response.usage; - if (!usage) return; - interviewerUsage.input += usage.input; - interviewerUsage.output += usage.output; - interviewerUsage.cacheRead += usage.cacheRead; - interviewerUsage.cacheWrite += usage.cacheWrite; -}); - -const flue = await start({ agents: [SdcpnElicitor], providers: [provider] }); - -const conversationId = `baseline-condition-5-${startedAt.replaceAll(/[:.]/gu, "-")}`; -const targetDocumentId = conversationId; -const fetchApp: typeof fetch = (input, init) => - Promise.resolve( - app.fetch(input instanceof Request ? input : new Request(input, init)), - ); -const client = createFlueClient({ - url: `http://brunch.local/agents/${SDCPN_AGENT_ROUTE}/${conversationId}`, - fetch: fetchApp, -}); -const store = createLocalCaptureStore(targetDocumentPath(targetDocumentId)); - -const turns: HarnessTurnRecord[] = []; -const expertView: ExpertMessage[] = []; -let stopReason = "hard-stop"; -let turnsWithoutAsk = 0; -let wrapSent = false; -let consumedMessages = 0; - -async function dispatch(body: string, initial = false): Promise { - const admission = await client.send({ - message: { kind: "user", body }, - ...(initial ? { initialData: { targetDocumentId } } : {}), - }); - await client.wait(admission); -} - -async function writeArtifacts(): Promise { - const history = await client.history(); - const storeSnapshot = await store.read(); - const { model, report, record } = readCompletion(storeSnapshot); - const run: HarnessRunRecord = { - startedAt, - condition: CONDITION, - interviewerModel, - expertModel: EXPERT_MODEL, - conversationId, - stopReason, - turns, - timings: turnTimingRecorder.all(), - usage: { interviewer: interviewerUsage, expert: expertUsage }, - history, - store: storeSnapshot, - }; - const sweepTally = { applied: 0, refused: 0, noRange: 0 }; - for (const sweep of turns.flatMap((turn) => turn.sweeps)) { - if (sweep.status === "applied") sweepTally.applied += 1; - else if (sweep.status === "refused") sweepTally.refused += 1; - else if (sweep.status === "no-settled-range") sweepTally.noRange += 1; - } - await mkdir(transcriptDir, { recursive: true }); - const stem = join(transcriptDir, `condition-${CONDITION}`); - await writeFile(`${stem}.raw.json`, `${JSON.stringify(run, null, 2)}\n`); - await writeFile( - `${stem}.md`, - renderTranscript(run, openingMessage, sweepTally), - ); - await writeFile(`${stem}-model.md`, renderModel(model, report, record)); - await writeFile( - `${stem}-captures.json`, - `${JSON.stringify(storeSnapshot, null, 2)}\n`, - ); - await writeFile( - `${stem}-system.md`, - [ - "# Condition 5 — the interviewer's instructions", - "", - "Reconstructed with the same functions the binding composes them from", - "(`askProtocolInstructionFragments`, `settlementProtocolInstructionFragments`,", - "`renderInstructions(repertoire, sdcpnDefinition)`), so this is the text the", - "elicitor rendered, minus whatever Flue prepends about its own tools.", - "", - "---", - "", - [ - ...askProtocolInstructionFragments(sdcpn.targetFormalism), - ...settlementProtocolInstructionFragments(), - renderInstructions(repertoire, sdcpnDefinition), - ].join("\n\n"), - "", - ].join("\n"), - ); -} - -try { - console.error( - `condition ${CONDITION}: interviewer ${interviewerModel}, expert ${EXPERT_MODEL}`, - ); - let outgoing = openingMessage; - let initial = true; - while (turns.length < hardStopAt) { - const turnNumber = turns.length + 1; - console.error(`turn ${turnNumber} (interviewer)`); - turnTimingRecorder.startInterviewerTurn(turnNumber); - await dispatch(outgoing, initial); - initial = false; - - const history = await client.history(); - const fresh = history.messages.slice(consumedMessages); - consumedMessages = history.messages.length; - const observed = readTurn(fresh); - const pendingId = pendingAskAffordanceId( - projectFlueHistoryForSweep(history), - ); - const pendingQuestion = - pendingId === undefined - ? undefined - : observed.asks.find( - (ask) => - !ask.rejected && `affordance_${ask.toolCallId}` === pendingId, - )?.question; - const { record: completion } = readCompletion(await store.read()); - const turnTimings = turnTimingRecorder.forInterviewerTurn(turnNumber); - const turn: HarnessTurnRecord = { - turn: turnNumber, - ...observed, - ...(pendingQuestion === undefined ? {} : { pendingQuestion }), - timings: turnTimings, - completion, - }; - turns.push(turn); - await appendFile( - timingsPath, - `${turnTimings.map((timing) => JSON.stringify(timing)).join("\n")}\n`, - ); - console.error( - ` harness: ${completion.captures} captures, complete ${yesNo(completion.complete)}, ${completion.unsatisfied} unsatisfied; sweeps ${observed.sweeps.map((sweep) => sweep.status).join(",") || "none"}; ask ${pendingQuestion === undefined ? "none" : "pending"}`, - ); - - if (observed.settlement) { - stopReason = `submission-${observed.settlement}`; - break; - } - if (pendingQuestion === undefined) { - turnsWithoutAsk += 1; - if (completion.complete) { - stopReason = "closed-complete"; - break; - } - if (wrapSent) { - stopReason = "closed-incomplete"; - break; - } - if (turnsWithoutAsk >= STALL_AFTER_TURNS_WITHOUT_ASK) { - stopReason = "stalled"; - break; - } - } else { - turnsWithoutAsk = 0; - } - if (turns.length >= hardStopAt) break; - - // What the expert sees: the interviewer's visible text and its question. - const visible = [ - ...observed.text, - ...(pendingQuestion === undefined ? [] : [pendingQuestion]), - ] - .join("\n\n") - .trim(); - expertView.push({ - role: "user", - content: - visible.length > 0 - ? visible - : "[The interviewer said nothing this turn.]", - }); - - if (turnNumber >= FORCE_WRAP_AT) { - wrapSent = true; - outgoing = FORCED_WRAP_MESSAGE; - expertView.push({ role: "assistant", content: FORCED_WRAP_MESSAGE }); - turns[turns.length - 1] = { - ...turn, - expert: { content: FORCED_WRAP_MESSAGE, stimulus: FORCED_WRAP_MESSAGE }, - }; - continue; - } - - console.error(`turn ${turnNumber} (expert)`); - const reply = await callExpert(situationPack, expertView); - const stimulus = turnNumber === IMPATIENCE_AT ? IMPATIENCE_LINE : undefined; - outgoing = stimulus ? `${reply.text}\n\n${stimulus}` : reply.text; - expertView.push({ role: "assistant", content: outgoing }); - turns[turns.length - 1] = { - ...turn, - expert: { - content: reply.text, - ...(stimulus ? { stimulus } : {}), - ...(reply.truncated ? { truncated: true } : {}), - }, - }; - } - await writeArtifacts(); - const last = turns.at(-1)?.completion; - console.error( - `done: ${stopReason} after ${turns.length} interviewer turns; ${last?.captures ?? 0} captures, complete ${yesNo(last?.complete === true)}; interviewer ${formatUsage(interviewerUsage)}; expert ${formatUsage(expertUsage)}`, - ); -} catch (error) { - stopReason = `runner-error: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)}`; - console.error(error); - await writeArtifacts().catch((writeError: unknown) => - console.error(writeError), - ); - process.exitCode = 1; -} finally { - stopObserving(); - await flue.stop(); - await rm(targetDocumentDirectory, { recursive: true, force: true }); -} diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/legacy-baseline/protocol.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/legacy-baseline/protocol.md index 1b79e76a4ca..2a577a337c6 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/legacy-baseline/protocol.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/legacy-baseline/protocol.md @@ -15,8 +15,7 @@ harness around that text. **Retirement (2026-08-28).** This is a retained historical instrument, not a supported path for new evaluation runs. The current prospective path is [`../prospective-runbook-v1/`](../prospective-runbook-v1/); its evidence is graded with -[`../ir-quality-ruler-v1/`](../ir-quality-ruler-v1/). The runner and hermetic tests remain only -until a separately scoped removal verifies no remaining operational dependency. +[`../ir-quality-ruler-v1/`](../ir-quality-ruler-v1/). The unsupported runners and their hermetic timing test were removed after verifying that no current command or protocol depended on them. The exact executed sources remain reconstructible at commit `b59b323bf1b26eee9a2345a8412ca466f5d6e851`. ## Conditions @@ -50,7 +49,7 @@ are tiered: freely given, _(tacit)_ (surfaces only under reaching questions), _( (honest perspective error), _(doesn't know)_ (genuine absences the interviewer should record rather than fill). -## Mechanics ([run.ts](run.ts) for conditions 1, 2, and 4; [harness-run.ts](harness-run.ts) for 5) +## Mechanics (historical runners at commit `b59b323bf1b26eee9a2345a8412ca466f5d6e851`) - Alternating API calls; each side sees only its own history. The interviewer never sees the situation pack; the expert never sees the v0 prompt. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/legacy-baseline/run.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/legacy-baseline/run.ts deleted file mode 100644 index b2ece1339c9..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/legacy-baseline/run.ts +++ /dev/null @@ -1,636 +0,0 @@ -// Baseline interview runner (FE-1361) for the prompt-only conditions. -// -// Conditions 1 and 2 preserve the reviewed FE-1361 controls: bare Claude and the v0 elicitation -// prompt. Condition 4 is the ADR-0007 teaching layer as prompt only. Condition 5 — the shipped -// harness in the loop — runs from `harness-run.ts`. Condition 3 (the FE-1404 preregistered -// completion-and-guidance instrument with a test-only operator projection) was retired without a -// run and its code removed on 2026-08-26; `condition-3-preregistration.md` and -// `condition-3-prompt.md` remain as the record of what was planned. -// -// Usage: ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=... node --experimental-strip-types run.ts <1|2|4> [--resume|--continue-final] -// Condition 4's interviewer system prompt is condition-4-prompt.md plus the harness's rendering of -// the repertoire and the SDCPN plugin definition (contract, guidance, construct runbook), with no -// harness machinery behind it. It reads the rendering from `@hashintel/brunch-agent`'s built -// output, so run `turbo build` first. -// --resume continue an interrupted run from its checkpoint -// --continue-final ask the interviewer to finish a final delivery that was cut off at max_tokens -// -// Production outputs, under docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-legacy-baseline/transcripts/: -// condition-.md readable transcript with run metadata -// condition-.raw.json full message arrays + per-call token usage (also the checkpoint) -// condition--model.txt the final delivery message, verbatim (delivered runs only) - -import { existsSync } from "node:fs"; -import { mkdir, readFile, writeFile } from "node:fs/promises"; -import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url"; - -import type Anthropic from "@anthropic-ai/sdk"; - -const INTERVIEWER_MODEL = "claude-opus-5"; -const EXPERT_MODEL = "claude-sonnet-5"; -const CLASSIFIER_MODEL = "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001"; - -// Interviewer turns, not exchanges. ReqElicitGym budgets 20; we force a wrap-up at 20 and -// hard-stop at 24 in case the model keeps talking instead of delivering. -const FORCE_WRAP_AT = 20; -const HARD_STOP_AT = 24; -// The scripted impatience probe (LLMREI: interviewers end too readily on impatience cues). -// Appended to the expert's reply on this exchange, identically in every condition. -const IMPATIENCE_AT = 8; -const IMPATIENCE_LINE = - "(Sorry — I've just seen the time, I have the floor huddle in ten minutes. How much more do you need?)"; -const FORCED_WRAP_MESSAGE = - "I really do have to stop here. Please produce the model now with everything you have."; -const CONTINUE_MESSAGE = - "You were cut off mid-document. Continue exactly from where you stopped — no preamble, no repetition."; - -type ChatMessage = Omit & { - content: Extract; - // Present only when the API ended this model-generated message at its token limit. - // Older checkpoints and human-authored messages legitimately omit it. - truncated?: true; -}; - -type Usage = Pick & - Partial< - Pick< - Anthropic.Usage, - "cache_creation_input_tokens" | "cache_read_input_tokens" - > - >; - -interface CallRecord { - agent: "interviewer" | "expert" | "classifier"; - model: Anthropic.Model; - usage: Usage; -} - -interface CallResult { - text: string; - truncated: boolean; -} - -interface RawCheckpoint { - startedAt: string; - condition: "1" | "2" | "4"; - stopReason: string; - calls: CallRecord[]; - interviewerMessages: ChatMessage[]; -} - -function usage(): never { - console.error("usage: node run.ts <1|2|4> [--resume|--continue-final]"); - process.exit(1); -} - -const conditionArg = process.argv[2]; -const mode = process.argv[3] ?? "fresh"; -if (conditionArg !== "1" && conditionArg !== "2" && conditionArg !== "4") - usage(); -if (mode !== "fresh" && mode !== "--resume" && mode !== "--continue-final") - usage(); -const condition = conditionArg; -const clientModule = process.env["BRUNCH_BASELINE_ANTHROPIC_MODULE"]; -const testOutputDirectory = process.env["BRUNCH_BASELINE_TEST_OUTPUT_DIR"]; -const apiKey = process.env["ANTHROPIC_API_KEY"]; -if (testOutputDirectory && !clientModule) { - console.error( - "BRUNCH_BASELINE_TEST_OUTPUT_DIR requires BRUNCH_BASELINE_ANTHROPIC_MODULE", - ); - process.exit(1); -} -if (!apiKey && !clientModule) { - console.error("ANTHROPIC_API_KEY is not set"); - process.exit(1); -} -interface BaselineAnthropicClient { - messages: { - create( - request: Anthropic.MessageCreateParamsNonStreaming, - ): Promise; - }; -} - -let anthropic: BaselineAnthropicClient | undefined; - -async function getAnthropic(): Promise { - if (anthropic) return anthropic; - const resolvedClient = clientModule - ? ((await import(clientModule)).default as BaselineAnthropicClient) - : (new (await import("@anthropic-ai/sdk")).default({ - apiKey, - maxRetries: 5, - timeout: 30 * 60 * 1000, - }) as BaselineAnthropicClient); - anthropic = resolvedClient; - return resolvedClient; -} - -const baseDir = fileURLToPath(new URL(".", import.meta.url)); -const caseDir = fileURLToPath( - new URL("../../cases/vestera-scheduling/", import.meta.url), -); -const transcriptDir = - testOutputDirectory ?? - fileURLToPath( - new URL( - "../../../docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-legacy-baseline/transcripts/", - import.meta.url, - ), - ); -const calls: CallRecord[] = []; - -async function callClaude( - agent: CallRecord["agent"], - model: CallRecord["model"], - system: string | undefined, - messages: ChatMessage[], - maxTokens: number, - options: { allowThinking?: boolean } = {}, -): Promise { - // The interviewer keeps the model's default (adaptive) thinking — that is part of "vanilla - // Claude". The expert and classifier have it disabled: a thinking block that consumes the - // whole token budget yields an empty text message, which the API then rejects on re-send. - // Transport-level retries (429/5xx/network, retry-after) live in the SDK; this loop only - // handles the empty-text case, which is a budget problem rather than a transport one. - let tokenBudget = maxTokens; - for (let attempt = 1; attempt <= 5; attempt++) { - const response = await ( - await getAnthropic() - ).messages.create({ - model, - max_tokens: tokenBudget, - ...(options.allowThinking - ? {} - : { thinking: { type: "disabled" as const } }), - ...(system ? { system } : {}), - // Project persistence metadata out of the provider request. - messages: messages.map((message) => ({ - role: message.role, - content: message.content, - })), - }); - calls.push({ - agent, - model: response.model, - usage: { - input_tokens: response.usage.input_tokens, - output_tokens: response.usage.output_tokens, - cache_creation_input_tokens: - response.usage.cache_creation_input_tokens ?? 0, - cache_read_input_tokens: response.usage.cache_read_input_tokens ?? 0, - }, - }); - const text = response.content - .filter((block) => block.type === "text") - .map((block) => block.text) - .join("\n"); - if (text.trim() === "") { - // Adaptive thinking can consume the entire budget before any text is emitted. - tokenBudget *= 2; - console.error( - ` ${agent}: empty text (blocks: ${response.content.map((block) => block.type).join(",")}), ` + - `retrying with max_tokens=${tokenBudget}`, - ); - continue; - } - return { text, truncated: response.stop_reason === "max_tokens" }; - } - throw new Error(`${agent}: exhausted retries`); -} - -// The interviewer's final delivery can exceed one response budget; stitch continuations into -// a single message so the transcript holds the complete deliverable. The truncation flag of -// the *last* piece survives the stitching: a message still cut off after the piece cap must -// be reported as incomplete, not silently written as if it were whole. -async function callInterviewer( - system: string | undefined, - messages: ChatMessage[], -): Promise { - let result = await callClaude( - "interviewer", - INTERVIEWER_MODEL, - system, - messages, - 16_000, - { - allowThinking: true, - }, - ); - let text = result.text; - for (let piece = 1; result.truncated && piece <= 4; piece++) { - console.error(` interviewer: truncated, requesting continuation ${piece}`); - result = await callClaude( - "interviewer", - INTERVIEWER_MODEL, - system, - [ - ...messages, - { role: "assistant", content: text }, - { role: "user", content: CONTINUE_MESSAGE }, - ], - 16_000, - { allowThinking: true }, - ); - // No separator at the seam: the cut usually lands mid-line or mid-token - // and the model is instructed to continue exactly from where it stopped, - // so an injected newline would corrupt the merged document. - text += result.text; - } - return { text, truncated: result.truncated }; -} - -async function loadSection(file: string): Promise { - const raw = await readFile( - file.startsWith("/") ? file : baseDir + file, - "utf8", - ); - const separatorIndex = raw.indexOf("\n---\n"); - return separatorIndex === -1 - ? raw.trim() - : raw.slice(separatorIndex + 5).trim(); -} - -async function isFinalModel(message: string): Promise { - const verdict = await callClaude( - "classifier", - CLASSIFIER_MODEL, - "You label messages from an AI assistant that was asked to interview a user and then " + - "produce a process model. Answer with exactly YES or NO.", - [ - { - role: "user", - content: - "Does the following message contain the final model deliverable (a complete model " + - "artifact such as a JSON document or a full structured model specification), as " + - "opposed to only questions, discussion, or interim summaries?\n\n\n" + - message + - "\n", - }, - ], - 16, - ); - return verdict.text.trim().toUpperCase().startsWith("YES"); -} - -const openingMessage = await loadSection(`${caseDir}opening-message.md`); - -/** - * Condition 4's system prompt: the hand-written framing for a prompt-only run, - * then the harness's own rendering of the repertoire and the SDCPN definition — - * the same text the binding would put in front of the interviewer, minus the - * preamble about machinery this run does not have. - */ -async function renderCondition4System(): Promise { - const harness = (await import("@hashintel/brunch-agent")) as { - readPluginDefinition: (yaml: string) => unknown; - readRepertoire: (yaml: string) => unknown; - renderContract: (definition: unknown) => string[]; - renderGuidance: (repertoire: unknown, definition: unknown) => string[]; - renderRunbook: ( - repertoire: unknown, - definition: unknown, - job: "construct" | "review-and-revise", - ) => string; - }; - const packagesDir = fileURLToPath( - new URL("../../../../packages/", import.meta.url), - ); - const definition = harness.readPluginDefinition( - await readFile(`${packagesDir}plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml`, "utf8"), - ); - const repertoire = harness.readRepertoire( - await readFile(`${packagesDir}repertoire/repertoire.yaml`, "utf8"), - ); - const rendered = [ - ...harness.renderContract(definition), - ...harness.renderGuidance(repertoire, definition), - harness.renderRunbook(repertoire, definition, "construct"), - ].join("\n\n"); - return `${await loadSection("condition-4-prompt.md")}\n\n${rendered}`; -} - -const interviewerSystem = - condition === "2" - ? await loadSection("v0-prompt.md") - : condition === "4" - ? await renderCondition4System() - : undefined; -const situationPack = await readFile(`${caseDir}situation-pack.md`, "utf8"); - -let interviewerMessages: ChatMessage[] = [ - { role: "user", content: openingMessage }, -]; -let stopReason = "hard-stop"; - -// The expert sees the same conversation from the other side: everything after -// the opening message, roles flipped. Derived on demand rather than kept as a -// parallel array every push had to maintain and resume had to rebuild. -function expertView(): ChatMessage[] { - return interviewerMessages.slice(1).map((message) => ({ - role: - message.role === "assistant" ? ("user" as const) : ("assistant" as const), - content: message.content, - })); -} -let interviewerTurns = 0; -let startedAt = new Date().toISOString(); -await mkdir(transcriptDir, { recursive: true }); -const artifactStem = `condition-${condition}`; -const rawPath = `${transcriptDir}/${artifactStem}.raw.json`; - -if (mode === "fresh" && existsSync(rawPath)) { - // The checkpoint is also the run's only record; an unguarded fresh run - // overwrites hours of paid transcript on its first in-progress write. - console.error( - `${rawPath} already exists — a fresh run would overwrite it. ` + - "Use --resume (or --continue-final), or move the transcripts for this condition aside first.", - ); - process.exit(1); -} - -if (mode !== "fresh") { - const checkpoint = JSON.parse( - await readFile(rawPath, "utf8"), - ) as RawCheckpoint; - interviewerMessages = checkpoint.interviewerMessages; - calls.push(...checkpoint.calls); - interviewerTurns = interviewerMessages.filter( - (message) => message.role === "assistant", - ).length; - startedAt = checkpoint.startedAt; - stopReason = checkpoint.stopReason; -} - -function writeCheckpoint(reason: string): Promise { - const checkpoint: RawCheckpoint = { - startedAt, - condition, - stopReason: reason, - calls, - interviewerMessages, - }; - return writeFile(rawPath, JSON.stringify(checkpoint, null, 2)); -} - -async function writeArtifacts(): Promise { - // input_tokens excludes cache reads and writes, so summing it alone - // undercounts what the run actually paid for. Count all three. - const totals = calls.reduce( - (accumulator, call) => { - accumulator.input += call.usage.input_tokens; - accumulator.cacheWrite += call.usage.cache_creation_input_tokens ?? 0; - accumulator.cacheRead += call.usage.cache_read_input_tokens ?? 0; - accumulator.output += call.usage.output_tokens; - return accumulator; - }, - { input: 0, cacheWrite: 0, cacheRead: 0, output: 0 }, - ); - - const header = [ - `# Baseline control — condition ${condition} (${condition === "1" ? "bare" : condition === "2" ? "v0 prompt" : "rendered repertoire + plugin definition, prompt only"})`, - "", - `- Run started: ${startedAt}`, - `- Interviewer: ${INTERVIEWER_MODEL}${ - condition === "2" - ? " + v0-prompt.md" - : condition === "4" - ? " + condition-4-prompt.md + rendered repertoire.yaml + plugin-sdcpn/plugin.yaml (see condition-4-system.md)" - : " (no system prompt)" - }`, - `- Simulated expert: ${EXPERT_MODEL} + situation-pack.md`, - `- Interviewer turns: ${interviewerTurns} (impatience probe at ${IMPATIENCE_AT}, forced wrap at ${FORCE_WRAP_AT})`, - `- Stop reason: ${stopReason}`, - `- Tokens: ${totals.input} in (+${totals.cacheWrite} cache write, +${totals.cacheRead} cache read) / ${totals.output} out across ${calls.length} calls`, - "", - "---", - "", - ].join("\n"); - - const body = interviewerMessages - .map((message, index) => { - const speaker = - message.role === "assistant" - ? "**Interviewer**" - : index === 0 - ? "**Opening message**" - : "**Expert (Marta)**"; - return `${speaker}:\n\n${message.content}`; - }) - .join("\n\n---\n\n"); - - await writeFile(`${transcriptDir}/${artifactStem}.md`, header + body + "\n"); - if (condition === "4" && interviewerSystem !== undefined) { - await writeFile( - `${transcriptDir}/${artifactStem}-system.md`, - `# Condition 4 — assembled interviewer system prompt\n\n${interviewerSystem}\n`, - ); - } - await writeCheckpoint(stopReason); - - // The model artifact is the interviewer's final delivery message, verbatim. - // Extracting "the model" out of it (the old largest-fenced-block heuristic) - // depended on the delivery's formatting whims — one run fenced its whole - // model, the other delivered structured markdown with small illustrative - // fences, and the heuristic shipped a 517-byte fragment as that run's - // artifact. The delivery document is self-describing; readers compare the - // conditions' documents directly. - const finalMessage = interviewerMessages.at(-1); - if ( - stopReason.startsWith("delivered") && - finalMessage?.role === "assistant" - ) { - await writeFile( - `${transcriptDir}/${artifactStem}-model.txt`, - finalMessage.content, - ); - } else if (stopReason.startsWith("delivered")) { - // The transcript header claims a delivery, so a missing artifact must be - // loud — hours of paid run otherwise end with the main deliverable - // silently absent. - console.error( - `⚠ stop reason is '${stopReason}' but the transcript does not end with an interviewer ` + - `message — ${artifactStem}-model.txt was NOT written`, - ); - } - - console.error( - `done: ${stopReason} after ${interviewerTurns} interviewer turns; ` + - `${totals.input} in (+${totals.cacheWrite} cache write, +${totals.cacheRead} cache read) / ` + - `${totals.output} out`, - ); -} - -if (mode === "--continue-final") { - const final = interviewerMessages.at(-1); - if ( - final?.role !== "assistant" || - !final.truncated || - !stopReason.endsWith("-incomplete") - ) { - console.error( - "checkpoint does not end with a truncated interviewer message; nothing to continue", - ); - process.exit(1); - } - const priorMessages = interviewerMessages.slice(0, -1); - const continued = await callInterviewer(interviewerSystem, [ - ...priorMessages, - { role: "assistant", content: final.content }, - { role: "user", content: CONTINUE_MESSAGE }, - ]); - final.content += continued.text; - if (continued.truncated) { - console.error( - "⚠ still truncated after this continuation — run --continue-final again", - ); - } else { - delete final.truncated; - stopReason = stopReason.slice(0, -"-incomplete".length); - } - await writeArtifacts(); - process.exit(0); -} - -if (mode === "--resume") { - // A delivered checkpoint must never resume: doing so would pop and regenerate the paid - // final delivery, then overwrite the transcript. Check the durable reason rather than the - // trailing role because a capped non-final interviewer turn also ends with an assistant. - if (stopReason.startsWith("delivered")) { - console.error( - `condition ${condition} already ended '${stopReason}' — resuming would regenerate and ` + - "overwrite its final delivery. Use --continue-final to finish a truncated delivery, " + - "or move the transcripts aside to rerun from scratch.", - ); - process.exit(1); - } - if (stopReason === "expert-truncated") { - const partialExpertReply = interviewerMessages.at(-1); - if (partialExpertReply?.role !== "user" || !partialExpertReply.truncated) { - console.error( - "checkpoint says 'expert-truncated' but does not end with a truncated expert reply", - ); - process.exit(1); - } - // The partial text remains in the stopped checkpoint as evidence, but must never be fed - // to the interviewer as a complete answer. Resume removes it and retries the expert call - // against the same preceding interviewer question. - interviewerMessages.pop(); - console.error( - `regenerating truncated expert reply at interviewer turn ${interviewerTurns}`, - ); - const expertResult = await callClaude( - "expert", - EXPERT_MODEL, - situationPack, - expertView(), - 1_500, - ); - let expertText = expertResult.text; - if (interviewerTurns === IMPATIENCE_AT) { - expertText = `${expertText}\n\n${IMPATIENCE_LINE}`; - } - if (expertResult.truncated) { - interviewerMessages.push({ - role: "user", - content: expertText, - truncated: true, - }); - console.error( - "⚠ the regenerated expert reply is still truncated — checkpointed the partial reply " + - "without sending it to the interviewer; rerun with --resume to try again", - ); - await writeArtifacts(); - process.exit(0); - } - interviewerMessages.push({ role: "user", content: expertText }); - await writeCheckpoint("in-progress"); - } - // Checkpoints are written after complete exchanges only, but tolerate a trailing - // assistant message by regenerating that turn. - stopReason = "hard-stop"; - if (interviewerMessages.at(-1)?.role === "assistant") { - interviewerMessages.pop(); - } - interviewerTurns = interviewerMessages.filter( - (message) => message.role === "assistant", - ).length; - console.error( - `resuming condition ${condition} at interviewer turn ${interviewerTurns + 1}`, - ); -} - -while (interviewerTurns < HARD_STOP_AT) { - interviewerTurns++; - console.error(`turn ${interviewerTurns} (interviewer)`); - const interviewer = await callInterviewer( - interviewerSystem, - interviewerMessages, - ); - interviewerMessages.push({ - role: "assistant", - content: interviewer.text, - ...(interviewer.truncated ? { truncated: true as const } : {}), - }); - - if (await isFinalModel(interviewer.text)) { - stopReason = - interviewerTurns >= FORCE_WRAP_AT - ? "delivered-after-forced-wrap" - : "delivered"; - if (interviewer.truncated) { - stopReason += "-incomplete"; - console.error( - "⚠ the final delivery is still truncated after stitching — " + - "rerun with --continue-final to finish it", - ); - } - break; - } - - if (interviewer.truncated) { - stopReason = "interviewer-truncated"; - console.error( - "⚠ the non-final interviewer reply is truncated after the continuation cap — " + - "checkpointed it without sending the partial question to the expert; rerun with " + - "--resume to regenerate the interviewer turn", - ); - break; - } - - let expertText: string; - let expertTruncated = false; - if (interviewerTurns >= FORCE_WRAP_AT) { - expertText = FORCED_WRAP_MESSAGE; - } else { - console.error(`turn ${interviewerTurns} (expert)`); - const expertResult = await callClaude( - "expert", - EXPERT_MODEL, - situationPack, - expertView(), - 1_500, - ); - expertText = expertResult.text; - expertTruncated = expertResult.truncated; - if (interviewerTurns === IMPATIENCE_AT) { - expertText = `${expertText}\n\n${IMPATIENCE_LINE}`; - } - } - interviewerMessages.push({ - role: "user", - content: expertText, - ...(expertTruncated ? { truncated: true as const } : {}), - }); - if (expertTruncated) { - stopReason = "expert-truncated"; - console.error( - "⚠ the expert reply is truncated — checkpointed the partial reply without sending it " + - "to the interviewer; rerun with --resume to regenerate it", - ); - break; - } - await writeCheckpoint("in-progress"); -} - -await writeArtifacts(); diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/legacy-baseline/turn-timing.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/legacy-baseline/turn-timing.ts deleted file mode 100644 index 92a18a778d3..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/legacy-baseline/turn-timing.ts +++ /dev/null @@ -1,162 +0,0 @@ -import type { FlueObservation, ModelRequest } from "@flue/runtime"; - -export const TURN_TIMING_PURPOSES = ["interview", "sweep", "repair"] as const; - -export type TurnTimingPurpose = (typeof TURN_TIMING_PURPOSES)[number]; - -export interface TurnTimingRecord { - readonly interviewerTurn: number; - readonly flueTurnId: string; - readonly purpose: TurnTimingPurpose; - readonly durationMs: number; -} - -export interface TurnTimingRecorder { - startInterviewerTurn(interviewerTurn: number): void; - observe(event: FlueObservation): void; - forInterviewerTurn(interviewerTurn: number): readonly TurnTimingRecord[]; - all(): readonly TurnTimingRecord[]; -} - -const signalPurpose = ( - request: ModelRequest, -): TurnTimingPurpose | undefined => { - const latestMessage = request.input.messages.at(-1); - if (latestMessage?.role !== "user") return undefined; - const content = - typeof latestMessage.content === "string" - ? latestMessage.content - : latestMessage.content - .filter((part) => part.type === "text") - .map((part) => part.text) - .join("\n"); - if (content.startsWith(" { - if (event.type !== "tool") return undefined; - const result = event.effectiveResult ?? event.result; - if (typeof result !== "object" || result === null) return undefined; - const output = "output" in result ? result.output : result; - if (typeof output !== "object" || output === null) return undefined; - return "status" in output && typeof output.status === "string" - ? output.status - : undefined; -}; - -export const createTurnTimingRecorder = (): TurnTimingRecorder => { - let currentInterviewerTurn: number | undefined; - const activePromptOperationIds: string[] = []; - const nestedPromptOperationIds = new Set(); - const repairingPromptOperationIds = new Set(); - const purposeByOperation = new Map(); - const purposeByFlueTurn = new Map(); - const timingRecords: TurnTimingRecord[] = []; - - return { - startInterviewerTurn(interviewerTurn) { - currentInterviewerTurn = interviewerTurn; - }, - observe(event) { - if ( - event.type === "operation_start" && - event.operationKind === "prompt" - ) { - const parentOperationId = activePromptOperationIds.at(-1); - if (parentOperationId !== undefined) { - nestedPromptOperationIds.add(event.operationId); - purposeByOperation.set( - event.operationId, - repairingPromptOperationIds.has(parentOperationId) || - purposeByOperation.get(parentOperationId) === "repair" - ? "repair" - : "sweep", - ); - } - activePromptOperationIds.push(event.operationId); - return; - } - if (event.type === "operation") { - const activeIndex = activePromptOperationIds.lastIndexOf( - event.operationId, - ); - if (activeIndex !== -1) activePromptOperationIds.splice(activeIndex, 1); - nestedPromptOperationIds.delete(event.operationId); - repairingPromptOperationIds.delete(event.operationId); - purposeByOperation.delete(event.operationId); - return; - } - if (event.type === "tool" && event.toolName === "brunch_sweep") { - const activeOperationId = activePromptOperationIds.at(-1); - if (activeOperationId === undefined) return; - const status = toolResultStatus(event); - if (status === undefined) return; - if (status === "refused") { - repairingPromptOperationIds.add(activeOperationId); - purposeByOperation.set(activeOperationId, "repair"); - } else { - purposeByOperation.set( - activeOperationId, - repairingPromptOperationIds.has(activeOperationId) - ? "repair" - : "sweep", - ); - repairingPromptOperationIds.delete(activeOperationId); - } - return; - } - if (event.type === "turn_request") { - const operationId = - event.operationId !== undefined && - purposeByOperation.has(event.operationId) - ? event.operationId - : activePromptOperationIds.at(-1); - const operationPurpose = - operationId === undefined - ? undefined - : purposeByOperation.get(operationId); - const purpose = - operationId !== undefined && nestedPromptOperationIds.has(operationId) - ? (operationPurpose ?? "sweep") - : event.purpose === "agent" - ? (signalPurpose(event.request) ?? - operationPurpose ?? - "interview") - : (operationPurpose ?? "interview"); - purposeByFlueTurn.set(event.turnId, purpose); - if ( - event.operationId !== undefined && - !nestedPromptOperationIds.has(event.operationId) - ) { - purposeByOperation.set(event.operationId, purpose); - } - return; - } - if (event.type !== "turn" || currentInterviewerTurn === undefined) { - return; - } - timingRecords.push({ - interviewerTurn: currentInterviewerTurn, - flueTurnId: event.turnId, - purpose: - purposeByFlueTurn.get(event.turnId) ?? - (event.operationId === undefined - ? undefined - : purposeByOperation.get(event.operationId)) ?? - "interview", - durationMs: event.durationMs, - }); - purposeByFlueTurn.delete(event.turnId); - }, - forInterviewerTurn(interviewerTurn) { - return timingRecords.filter( - (timingRecord) => timingRecord.interviewerTurn === interviewerTurn, - ); - }, - all() { - return timingRecords; - }, - }; -}; diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/mission-4-product-witness-v2/protocol.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/mission-4-product-witness-v2/protocol.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..d60015492d5 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/mission-4-product-witness-v2/protocol.md @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +# Mission 4 local/restricted product witness v2 + +Status: proposed procedure; not executed or accepted. + +## Purpose + +Prove that the final frozen Mission 4 production instrument crosses the real local/restricted Petrinaut panel → same-origin AI SDK route → production Flue `ChatAgent` boundary and obeys the routing contract. This is not remote deployment evidence. + +## Preconditions + +- The parent has frozen and committed the final production instrument. +- At least one valid v4 campaign member identifies the same source commit, instrument fingerprint, and built-server artifact manifest. +- No instrument file has changed since that member, and the witness's Brunch bundle matches that retained built-server manifest byte for byte. +- The parent starts and records the production Brunch and Petrinaut entrypoints; stale bundles are rebuilt before the witness begins. +- The witness uses a fresh browser conversation and does not receive construction mode or construction tools. + +If the product boundary exposes an instrument defect, stop. Any repair creates a new frozen candidate and invalidates same-instrument correspondence with the prior campaign; do not label a repaired rerun as the same witness. + +## Interaction + +1. Open the tracked Petrinaut AI assistant panel through its real local route. +2. Submit one bounded operational-process modelling request that requires interactive elicitation. +3. Observe skill activation and successful reads of `references/universal-elicitation.md` and `references/profile.md` before the first substantive question. +4. Answer that one focused question and request a recoverable workpiece without construction. +5. Observe a successful `templates/workpiece.md` read before the first `runbook-ir` creation. +6. Verify that no assistant turn asks more than one focused human-knowledge question, no construction resource/tool is exposed or used, no net mutates, and the visible panel renders the workpiece. + +## Required retained evidence + +Retain under `docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v4/product-witness/`: + +- screenshots of the submitted request, first question, resource/tool activity, and visible workpiece; +- browser accessibility snapshots for the same states; +- a browser network record binding the panel request to the same-origin `/api/chat` route; +- the exact raw Flue conversation snapshot and readable transcript, including conversation id, skill activation, ordered resource calls and outcomes, and mounted/called tool names; +- the Brunch built-server artifact manifest and its comparison with the selected campaign member; +- Brunch and Petrinaut start/build commands and relevant server logs; +- SHA-256 hashes for every retained artifact; +- an adjudication mapping each Mission 4 witness claim to exact raw evidence and stating what the witness does not prove. + +Ignored `.playwright-cli/` scratch is not evidence. Copy only the required raw artifacts into the versioned evidence directory before stopping the servers or cleaning local state. + +## Acceptance + +The parent audits path and hash correspondence, confirms the campaign source commit matches the witness instrument, and presents the evidence to the owner. Only the owner accepts the witness. A runner, browser operator, or builder may report observations but may not declare witness acceptance, select the Mission 5 handoff, archive Mission 4, or close the mission. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v1/ARCHIVE.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v1/ARCHIVE.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..556ff0b9e07 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v1/ARCHIVE.md @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +# Archived executed control + +The Mission 3 prospective baseline is immutable and must not be rerun or overwritten. Its live runner, package command, and runner test were retired after the campaign evidence was retained. + +The exact instrument and runner are reconstructible from the source revision and embedded manifests under `docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/`. The frozen `protocol.md` remains unchanged because it is part of that evidence. + +New Mission 4 evidence belongs to the separately versioned `../prospective-runbook-v4/` protocol and namespace after parent freeze and explicit paid authorization. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v2/ARCHIVE.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v2/ARCHIVE.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e2d9339f7d8 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v2/ARCHIVE.md @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +# Archived protocol + +The v2 campaign was aborted and must not be rerun. Its live runner, package command, and runner test were deleted after the immutable failure artifacts were retained. + +The exact executed runner and instrument are reconstructible from source commit `605e681cebfaeaa3fcdd0502f50ab28adc7ac63d` and the embedded manifest in `docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-candidate-v2/`. The frozen `protocol.md` is retained unchanged because its hash is part of that evidence. + +Use `../prospective-runbook-v4/protocol.md` for the proposed repaired Mission 4 campaign after parent freeze and explicit paid authorization. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v3/ARCHIVE.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v3/ARCHIVE.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..321c6941508 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v3/ARCHIVE.md @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +# Archived invalid protocol execution + +The v3 campaign executed but produced no Mission 4-valid member: its only completed workpiece was created before the required template read, and both cold reviews were incomplete. Its live runner, package command, grader, and runner test were deleted after the immutable artifacts were retained. + +The exact scored runner and instrument are reconstructible from source commit `794fe2fbf1eaeba3fc816c6e3d1755d7b444125d` and the embedded manifest in `docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/`. The frozen `protocol.md` is retained unchanged because its hash is part of that evidence. See that directory's `campaign-adjudication.md` for the invalidation and arithmetic errata. + +Use `../prospective-runbook-v4/protocol.md` for the proposed repaired Mission 4 campaign after parent freeze and explicit paid authorization. diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/grade-architecture-v3.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/grade.ts similarity index 60% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/grade-architecture-v3.ts rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/grade.ts index c9adbe72045..8d9c3ca9682 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/grade-architecture-v3.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/grade.ts @@ -1,14 +1,28 @@ import { createHash, randomUUID } from "node:crypto"; -import { readFile, writeFile } from "node:fs/promises"; +import { readFile, readdir, writeFile } from "node:fs/promises"; import { basename, join, resolve } from "node:path"; import Anthropic from "@anthropic-ai/sdk"; -const repositoryRootPath = resolve(import.meta.dirname, "../../../../.."); +import { scoreReport } from "./score-report.ts"; + +const repositoryRootPath = resolve(import.meta.dirname, "../../../../../.."); const candidateDirectory = join( repositoryRootPath, - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v4", ); +const protocolId = "prospective-runbook-v4"; +const outputNamespaceId = "vestera-architecture-candidate-v4"; +const comparisonTarget = { + protocolId: "prospective-runbook-v1", + outputNamespaceId: "vestera-prospective-baseline-v1", + memberRunIds: [ + "runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-50-28-709Z-20a4817f", + "runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-56-34-754Z-4b75737c", + ], + qualityPopulation: "valid-workpieces", + runtimeAccounting: "reported-separately", +} as const; const requestedModel = "claude-sonnet-4-5"; const mode = process.env["BRUNCH_ARCHITECTURE_GRADER_MODE"]; const artifactBaseInput = process.env["BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_ARTIFACT_BASE"]; @@ -34,40 +48,100 @@ if (attempt !== undefined && !/^[2-9][0-9]*$/u.test(attempt)) { const artifactBase = resolve(artifactBaseInput); if ( artifactBase !== join(candidateDirectory, basename(artifactBase)) || - !basename(artifactBase).startsWith("prospective-runbook-v3-replication-") + !basename(artifactBase).startsWith("prospective-runbook-v4-replication-") ) { throw new Error( - "The grader accepts only a v3 artifact in the frozen candidate namespace.", + "The grader accepts only a v4 artifact in the frozen candidate namespace.", ); } interface CandidateRecord { readonly campaignFingerprint: string; readonly comparisonTarget: unknown; + readonly instrument: { + readonly fileSha256: Record; + }; + readonly outputNamespaceId: string; + readonly protocolId: string; + readonly rawConversationSnapshot: { + readonly messages: readonly { readonly id: string }[]; + }; + readonly replication: number; readonly runId: string; readonly status: string; readonly transcript: string; + readonly violations: readonly unknown[]; readonly workpiece?: { readonly content: string; readonly sha256: string; + readonly sourceMessageId: string; + readonly sourceMessageSha256: string; }; } +const sha256 = (content: string): string => + createHash("sha256").update(content).digest("hex"); const record = JSON.parse( await readFile(`${artifactBase}.json`, "utf8"), ) as CandidateRecord; -if (record.status !== "completed" || record.workpiece === undefined) { - throw new Error("Only a completed v3 workpiece may be graded."); +const artifactStem = basename(artifactBase); +if ( + record.protocolId !== protocolId || + record.outputNamespaceId !== outputNamespaceId || + record.runId !== artifactStem || + !Number.isSafeInteger(record.replication) || + record.replication < 1 || + record.replication > 3 || + !artifactStem.startsWith( + `${protocolId}-replication-${record.replication}-`, + ) || + JSON.stringify(record.comparisonTarget) !== + JSON.stringify(comparisonTarget) || + !/^[0-9a-f]{64}$/u.test(record.campaignFingerprint) || + record.status !== "completed" || + record.violations.length !== 0 || + record.workpiece === undefined +) { + throw new Error("Only an exact valid v4 campaign member may be graded."); +} + +const campaignRecordNames = (await readdir(candidateDirectory)).filter((name) => + /^prospective-runbook-v4-replication-[123]-.*\.json$/u.test(name), +); +if (campaignRecordNames.length !== 3) { + throw new Error("Complete all three v4 replications before grading."); } -const sha256 = (content: string): string => - createHash("sha256").update(content).digest("hex"); const ir = (await readFile(`${artifactBase}.ir.md`, "utf8")).trimEnd(); if (ir !== record.workpiece.content || sha256(ir) !== record.workpiece.sha256) { throw new Error( "The selected workpiece does not match its candidate record.", ); } +const sourceMessage = record.rawConversationSnapshot.messages.find( + ({ id }) => id === record.workpiece?.sourceMessageId, +); +if ( + sourceMessage === undefined || + sha256(JSON.stringify(sourceMessage)) !== record.workpiece.sourceMessageSha256 +) { + throw new Error( + "The selected workpiece source message does not match its candidate record.", + ); +} + +for (const sourcePath of [ + "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/campaign-integrity.ts", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/grade.ts", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/score-report.ts", +] as const) { + const source = await readFile(join(repositoryRootPath, sourcePath), "utf8"); + if (record.instrument.fileSha256[sourcePath] !== sha256(source)) { + throw new Error( + `Grader source differs from the frozen member: ${sourcePath}`, + ); + } +} const artifact = async ( relativePath: string, @@ -141,6 +215,19 @@ if (report.length === 0) { throw new Error(`The ${mode} grader returned no report.`); } +let scoreValidation: + | ReturnType + | { readonly error: string; readonly valid: false }; +try { + scoreValidation = scoreReport(mode, report); +} catch (error) { + scoreValidation = { + error: error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error), + valid: false, + }; +} +const complete = response.stop_reason === "end_turn" && scoreValidation.valid; + const outputSuffix = attempt === undefined ? mode : `${mode}-attempt-${attempt}`; const reportPath = `${artifactBase}.${outputSuffix}.md`; @@ -151,7 +238,9 @@ await writeFile( `${JSON.stringify( { schemaVersion: 1, - protocolId: "prospective-runbook-v3", + protocolId, + outputNamespaceId, + replication: record.replication, runId: record.runId, campaignFingerprint: record.campaignFingerprint, comparisonTarget: record.comparisonTarget, @@ -166,6 +255,8 @@ await writeFile( requestedModel, observedModel: response.model, stopReason: response.stop_reason, + complete, + scoreValidation, usage: response.usage, reportPath, reportSha256: sha256(report), @@ -179,13 +270,16 @@ await writeFile( ); process.stdout.write( - `ARCHITECTURE_V3_GRADE ${JSON.stringify({ + `ARCHITECTURE_V4_GRADE ${JSON.stringify({ mode, runId: record.runId, requestedModel, observedModel: response.model, stopReason: response.stop_reason, + complete, + scoreValidation, reportPath, metadataPath, })}\n`, ); +if (!complete) process.exitCode = 1; diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/protocol.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/protocol.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..5d13a7625c9 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/protocol.md @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ +# Mission 4 repaired architecture scoring v4 + +Status: **draft repair protocol; no paid execution authorized** + +Protocol id: `prospective-runbook-v4` + +Observed-output namespace: `vestera-architecture-candidate-v4` + +This protocol scores the owner-selected Mission 4 prompt, skill, progressive-disclosure, and workpiece architecture against only the latest valid flat-prompt control workpieces. It does not aggregate historical side quests, draft families, or every previous runbook design. The aborted v2 campaign remains operational evidence and is not a quality baseline. + +## Comparison target + +The immutable quality control is exactly these two valid members of `vestera-prospective-baseline-v1`: + +- `runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-50-28-709Z-20a4817f` +- `runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-56-34-754Z-4b75737c` + +Their frozen omniscient range is `66.3–80.0 / 100`; their cold-utility range is `3.3–3.5 / 4`; both have conditional downstream readiness and no hard-failure gate. Their workpieces, grade reports, and campaign adjudication are hashed into the v4 instrument. + +Quality scoring is conditional on a recoverable, valid workpiece on both sides. Runtime validity, simulator refusal, cost, and latency are reported separately and may not be converted into workpiece-quality points or used to alter either quality population. + +## Frozen campaign configuration + +| Setting | Value | +| --- | --- | +| Case | `vestera-scheduling` | +| Opening message | `../../cases/vestera-scheduling/opening-message.md` | +| Expert pack | `../../cases/vestera-scheduling/situation-pack.md` | +| Prospective ledger | `../../oracles/vestera-scheduling/truth-ledger-v1-prospective.yaml` | +| Quality ruler | `../../oracles/ir-quality-ruler-v1.md` | +| Interviewer | built production `ChatAgent`, requested model `claude-sonnet-4-5` | +| Simulated expert | requested model `claude-sonnet-4-5` | +| Interview turns | 8 before the final workpiece request | +| Per-logical-turn latency stop | 180,000 ms | +| Replications | 3 independent conversations, numbered 1–3 | +| Sampling | provider default; no seed | +| Omniscient grader | frozen `../ir-quality-ruler-v1/omniscient-grader.md`, fresh context per valid run | +| Cold reviewer | frozen `../ir-quality-ruler-v1/cold-ir-reviewer.md`, separate fresh context per valid run | +| Observed output | `../../../docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v4/` | + +This mirrors the flat-prompt control's three-invocation shape and seeks a two-workpiece quality population. It does not replace an invalid replication to reach that population. Changing a frozen value requires a new protocol and namespace. + +## Preconditions and freeze + +No paid budget is authorized. The parent must freeze the final clean instrument and obtain explicit owner authorization for a new call and cost ceiling before candidate or grader execution. Before creating a replication, the runner applies every free path, configuration, clean-instrument, fingerprint, and namespace guard, then makes a one-token credential/model-availability preflight outside campaign membership. A failed preflight creates no member. Successful preflight cost still counts against the owner ceiling. + +The runner hashes the complete candidate source and lock scope, complete built-server `dist/*.mjs` manifest, comparison-target artifacts, case, ledger, ruler, grader prompts, and this protocol. The first member fixes the fingerprint. Later members must match it exactly. + +The runner categorically rejects the immutable flat-prompt namespace and descendants after real-path canonicalization. Hermetic overrides remain restricted to the checked-in faux fixtures and cannot receive an API key. + +## Paid commands + +After a clean post-commit hermetic proof, run sequentially: + +```sh +BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_REPLICATION=1 yarn workspace @apps/brunch-agent runbook:elicit:architecture-v4 +BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_REPLICATION=2 yarn workspace @apps/brunch-agent runbook:elicit:architecture-v4 +BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_REPLICATION=3 yarn workspace @apps/brunch-agent runbook:elicit:architecture-v4 +``` + +Each command builds the application, preflights the provider, uses a fresh Flue conversation and temporary database, and writes an immutable artifact stem. + +## Validity and evidence semantics + +- The opening dispatch counts as interview turn 1. +- After eight interviewer turns or an earlier latency/empty-text stop, a labelled non-evidence stop instruction requests the current `runbook-ir` workpiece. +- A valid quality member must contain a recoverable workpiece and no ordinary-path violation. Universal and profile guidance must have returned successfully before the first interactive question, and the workpiece template must have returned successfully before first workpiece creation. +- Construction/capture tool use, construction-resource reads, undeclared tools/resources, or a missing workpiece make the candidate member invalid. +- Provider, simulator, interviewer, application, persistence, and cleanup failures remain immutable operational evidence. +- Human adjudication attributes failures by observed boundary. A simulated-expert refusal is not silently charged to candidate workpiece quality; a candidate failure is not silently relabelled as simulator failure. +- No invalid member is deleted, replaced, or graded as a workpiece. + +## Artifacts + +Completed and invalid runs retain the exact raw Flue snapshot and hash, readable transcript, selected workpiece and source-message binding when available, expert exchange, requested/observed model and stop metadata, costs, resource/tool traces, violations, configuration, comparison target, and complete instrument manifest. Runtime and cleanup failures use distinct nonce-bearing records so retention cannot mask the originating failure. + +The v2 artifacts remain in `vestera-prospective-candidate-v2/` with an abort adjudication. They are neither moved into v4 nor used as flat-prompt controls. + +## Grading and adjudication + +For each valid v4 workpiece: + +1. Give a fresh omniscient context exactly the frozen omniscient prompt, situation pack, prospective ledger, exact source conversation, and workpiece. +2. Give a separate fresh cold context exactly the frozen cold prompt, opening message, and workpiece. +3. Retain exact requested and observed grader identity and both reports. A grader completes only with provider `stop_reason: end_turn`, all required sections, exactly six scores, and a reported headline equal to the runner's independently recomputed weighted total or arithmetic mean. +4. Human-review hard failures, genuine disagreement, every `NEW-*` mistake, arithmetic validation, and failure attribution. +5. Compare candidate score vectors, mistake classes, cold utility, and readiness only with the two named flat-prompt controls. Report ranges and individual members; do not collapse either side to a mean. +6. Report completion, simulator/provider failures, cost, token use, and latency in a separate operational section. diff --git a/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v3-run.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/run.ts similarity index 94% rename from apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v3-run.ts rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/run.ts index 4128f5aebda..4d0a2f3f6ea 100644 --- a/apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v3-run.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/run.ts @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ /** - * Mission 4 architecture scoring campaign. + * Mission 4 repaired architecture scoring campaign. * * This is intentionally separate from the immutable flat-prompt control and * the aborted v2 operational campaign. * Build first, then run one explicitly numbered replication: * BRUNCH_RUNBOOK_REPLICATION=1 \ - * yarn workspace @apps/brunch-agent runbook:elicit:architecture-v3 + * yarn workspace @apps/brunch-agent runbook:elicit:architecture-v4 */ import { execFile } from "node:child_process"; @@ -22,33 +22,33 @@ import { createFlueClient } from "@flue/sdk"; import { agentOwnershipHeaders, flueConversationIdFrom, -} from "../../conversation/identity.ts"; -import { formatFlueTranscript } from "../../conversation/transcript.ts"; -import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE } from "../../http/routes.ts"; +} from "../../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/identity.ts"; +import { formatFlueTranscript } from "../../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/src/conversation/transcript.ts"; import { interviewerToolNamesFrom, ordinaryElicitationViolationsFrom, recoverRunbookWorkpiece, skillResourcePathsFrom, -} from "./artifacts.ts"; +} from "../../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/artifacts.ts"; import { assertApprovedHermeticModelModules, builtServerArtifactManifest, canonicalPath, rejectImmutableBaselineOutput, sha256, -} from "./campaign-integrity.ts"; +} from "../../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/campaign-integrity.ts"; import { type BuiltBrunchApplication, loadBuiltBrunchApplication, -} from "./load-built-application.ts"; +} from "../../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/load-built-application.ts"; +import { CHAT_AGENT_ROUTE } from "../../../../../../apps/brunch-agent/src/http/routes.ts"; import type Anthropic from "@anthropic-ai/sdk"; import type { Provider } from "@earendil-works/pi-ai"; import type { FlueConversationSnapshot } from "@flue/sdk"; -const PROTOCOL_ID = "prospective-runbook-v3"; -const OUTPUT_NAMESPACE_ID = "vestera-architecture-candidate-v3"; +const PROTOCOL_ID = "prospective-runbook-v4"; +const OUTPUT_NAMESPACE_ID = "vestera-architecture-candidate-v4"; const COMPARISON_TARGET = { protocolId: "prospective-runbook-v1", outputNamespaceId: "vestera-prospective-baseline-v1", @@ -67,22 +67,19 @@ const FROZEN_REPLICATIONS = 3; process.env["BRUNCH_CHAT_MODEL"] ??= FROZEN_MODEL; const execFileAsync = promisify(execFile); -const repositoryRoot = new URL("../../../../../", import.meta.url); +const repositoryRoot = new URL("../../../../../../", import.meta.url); const repositoryRootPath = fileURLToPath(repositoryRoot); -const evaluationRoot = new URL( - "../../../../../libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/", - import.meta.url, -); +const evaluationRoot = new URL("../../", import.meta.url); const caseDirectory = new URL("cases/vestera-scheduling/", evaluationRoot); const candidateOutputDirectory = fileURLToPath( new URL( - "../../../../../libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v3/", + "../../../docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-architecture-candidate-v4/", import.meta.url, ), ); const immutableBaselineDirectory = fileURLToPath( new URL( - "../../../../../libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/", + "../../../docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/", import.meta.url, ), ); @@ -147,7 +144,7 @@ if (isHermeticRun) { }); if (outputDirectory === canonicalCandidateOutputDirectory) { throw new Error( - "Hermetic runs cannot write to vestera-architecture-candidate-v3.", + "Hermetic runs cannot write to vestera-architecture-candidate-v4.", ); } if (apiKey) { @@ -159,12 +156,12 @@ if (isHermeticRun) { } if (outputDirectory !== canonicalCandidateOutputDirectory) { throw new Error( - "Paid candidate runs must write to vestera-architecture-candidate-v3.", + "Paid candidate runs must write to vestera-architecture-candidate-v4.", ); } if (!usesFrozenConfiguration) { throw new Error( - "Paid candidate runs require the frozen prospective-runbook-v3 model, turn, and latency configuration.", + "Paid candidate runs require the frozen prospective-runbook-v4 model, turn, and latency configuration.", ); } if (allowDirtyInstrument) { @@ -188,7 +185,6 @@ const instrumentFiles = [ "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/artifacts.ts", "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/campaign-integrity.ts", "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/load-built-application.ts", - "apps/brunch-agent/src/evaluations/runbook/prospective-runbook-v3-run.ts", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/package.json", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/agent/index.ts", @@ -210,7 +206,11 @@ const instrumentFiles = [ "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/oracles/ir-quality-ruler-v1.md", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1/omniscient-grader.md", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/ir-quality-ruler-v1/cold-ir-reviewer.md", - "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v3/protocol.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/mission-4-product-witness-v2/protocol.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/protocol.md", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/run.ts", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/grade.ts", + "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/score-report.ts", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-50-28-709Z-20a4817f.ir.md", "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/runbook-elicitation-2026-08-31T10-50-28-709Z-20a4817f.omniscient.md", @@ -684,7 +684,7 @@ try { } process.stdout.write( - `PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V3_RESULT ${JSON.stringify({ + `PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V4_RESULT ${JSON.stringify({ protocolId: PROTOCOL_ID, outputNamespaceId: OUTPUT_NAMESPACE_ID, replication, @@ -762,7 +762,7 @@ try { retentionFailure = retentionError; } process.stderr.write( - `PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V3_FAILURE ${JSON.stringify({ + `PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V4_FAILURE ${JSON.stringify({ runId, artifact: retentionFailure === undefined ? failureArtifact : undefined, failure, @@ -851,7 +851,7 @@ try { retentionFailure = error; } process.stderr.write( - `PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V3_CLEANUP_FAILURE ${JSON.stringify({ + `PROSPECTIVE_RUNBOOK_V4_CLEANUP_FAILURE ${JSON.stringify({ runId, artifact: retentionFailure === undefined ? cleanupArtifact : undefined, cleanupFailures, diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/score-report.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/score-report.ts new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..e1ef5a3ac34 --- /dev/null +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/score-report.ts @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ +export type ScoreReportMode = "cold" | "omniscient"; + +export interface ScoreReportResult { + readonly computed: number; + readonly reported: number; + readonly scores: readonly number[]; + readonly valid: boolean; +} + +const sectionFrom = (report: string, heading: string): string => { + const start = report.indexOf(`## ${heading}`); + if (start === -1) { + throw new Error(`Grade report is missing the ${heading} section.`); + } + const end = report.indexOf("\n## ", start + heading.length + 3); + return report.slice(start, end === -1 ? undefined : end); +}; + +const scoresFrom = (section: string): readonly number[] => + section.split("\n").flatMap((line) => { + const cells = line.split("|").map((cell) => cell.trim()); + const score = Number(cells[2]); + return Number.isFinite(score) && score >= 0 && score <= 4 ? [score] : []; + }); + +const reportedScoreFrom = (mode: ScoreReportMode, report: string): number => { + const label = + mode === "omniscient" ? "Weighted total" : "Overall cold utility"; + const match = report.match( + new RegExp(`${label}:\\s*\\*{0,2}([0-9]+(?:\\.[0-9]+)?)`, "u"), + ); + if (match?.[1] === undefined) { + throw new Error(`Grade report is missing its reported ${label}.`); + } + return Number(match[1]); +}; + +const roundToOneDecimal = (value: number): number => + Math.round(value * 10) / 10; + +export const scoreReport = ( + mode: ScoreReportMode, + report: string, +): ScoreReportResult => { + const scores = scoresFrom( + sectionFrom(report, mode === "omniscient" ? "Score vector" : "Scorecard"), + ); + if (scores.length !== 6) { + throw new Error( + `Grade report must contain exactly six ${mode} scores; found ${scores.length}.`, + ); + } + const computed = roundToOneDecimal( + mode === "omniscient" + ? scores.reduce( + (total, score, index) => + total + (score / 4) * [20, 20, 20, 15, 15, 10][index]!, + 0, + ) + : scores.reduce((total, score) => total + score, 0) / scores.length, + ); + const reported = reportedScoreFrom(mode, report); + return { + computed, + reported, + scores, + valid: reported === computed, + }; +}; diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/README.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/README.md deleted file mode 100644 index f1b9f1f14be..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/README.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,229 +0,0 @@ -# Ampcode prompt-architecture prototype - -This directory is a non-authoritative paper prototype. It proposes a content and disclosure architecture for Brunch without changing production files. - -## Design claim - -Two independent structures are needed: - -1. **Disclosure layers** determine when guidance becomes available: always-on prompt, activated skill instructions, then phase-scoped resources. -2. **Semantic roles** determine what guidance does: procedure, model content, recognition, interviewing operations, workpiece recording, diagnostics, target authoring or construction, and completion checks. A plugin may combine adjacent roles when separating them would add no useful disclosure boundary. - -The five shared registers—**Directives**, **Recognition**, **Operations**, **Coverage**, and **Verification**—organize universal and plugin elicitation guidance. They are an additive authoring contract, not a lifecycle, workpiece schema, or reason to place every kind of guidance in one document. - -## Authored topology - -```text -ampcode/ -├── README.md -├── core/ -│ ├── SYSTEM.md -│ └── universal-elicitation.md -├── plugin-gherkin/ -│ ├── APPEND_SYSTEM.md -│ └── gherkin-specification/ -│ ├── SKILL.md -│ ├── gherkin-elicitation.md -│ ├── workpiece-template.md -│ └── gherkin-authoring-and-checks.md -└── plugin-sdcpn/ - ├── APPEND_SYSTEM.md - └── sdcpn-modelling/ - ├── SKILL.md - ├── sdcpn-elicitation.md - ├── workpiece-template.md - ├── pn-construction.md - └── checks.md -``` - -Core owns universal elicitation. Each plugin owns one domain-typology and target-formalism specialization. The recording contract and target-authoring responsibilities remain distinct from elicitation content even when a thin plugin combines their resources or phases. - -## Runtime disclosure - -```text -Always present -├── core/SYSTEM.md -└── plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md - -On `sdcpn-modelling` activation -└── SKILL.md - ├── interactive branch - │ ├── universal-elicitation.md - │ ├── sdcpn-elicitation.md - │ └── workpiece-template.md when recording or revising - └── construction branch - ├── pn-construction.md - └── checks.md -``` - -For the software-behavior/Gherkin pairing, the same disclosure architecture produces a thinner runtime shape: - -```text -Always present -├── core/SYSTEM.md -└── plugin-gherkin/APPEND_SYSTEM.md - -On `gherkin-specification` activation -└── SKILL.md - ├── elicitation and workpiece maintenance - │ ├── universal-elicitation.md - │ ├── gherkin-elicitation.md - │ └── workpiece-template.md when recording or revising - └── authoring, review, and delivery - └── gherkin-authoring-and-checks.md -``` - -The resource names in `SKILL.md` are logical addresses in one assembled Flue skill. In production, the plugin would use Flue's native `defineSkill()` to package the core-authored universal reference and plugin-authored resources under those safe skill-local names. They are not repository-relative Markdown links, and no resource relies on another resource being traversed automatically. - -## Channel boundary - -| Channel | Content test | -| --- | --- | -| Core `SYSTEM.md` | A universal invariant whose absence could already cause a wrong first turn or dishonest result | -| Plugin `APPEND_SYSTEM.md` | A specialization, activation rule, or plugin-specific guard needed before skill activation | -| `SKILL.md` | Mandatory procedure, branch selection, phase transition, or resource-reading decision | -| Elicitation references | Detailed teaching used while interviewing or revising the domain account | -| Workpiece template | How supported, inferred, unsettled, corrected, and omitted material is recorded | -| Target authoring or construction reference | How recorded domain meaning may be represented in the selected formalism | -| Checks | Whether the workpiece-to-target boundary, resulting artifact, and delivery are honest | - -If a rule must bind before a lazy resource might be read, it does not belong only in that resource. If material merely teaches how to carry out one phase, it does not earn always-on prompt space. - -Resources read together must be additive: when the universal and plugin elicitation references state the same rule, core owns it and the plugin retains only the domain-typology or target-formalism consequence. Resources read at different moments may project a universal invariant into a local recording or checking obligation. - -These channels are responsibility tests, not a required file count. SDCPN earns separate construction and checking resources because transformation is distant, lossy, tool-mediated, and sometimes construct-only. Gherkin combines authoring and checks because its projection is textual and near the elicited behavior, while retaining a separate workpiece for authorship, uncertainty, and unresolved material that a `.feature` document cannot honestly carry by itself. - -## Cross-plugin transformation invariant - -Three references now support one universal boundary: - -```text -person's intent and evidence -→ recoverable workpiece account -→ target-formalism transformation -→ evidence from named checks -→ claim about a surrounding system -``` - -These arrows are transformations and trust boundaries, not implications. Each stage preserves the source, attributes agent-authored choices, and reports strengthening, weakening, normalization, omission, approximation, assumptions, and losses that could change meaning. Evidence at one stage establishes only its named claim over the exact artifact and assumptions examined there. - -- An SDCPN parser or simulation does not establish that the net preserves the operational account or covers every relevant execution. -- A Gherkin parser does not establish step binding, execution, or behavioral adequacy. -- A Dafny verifier does not establish that agent-authored predicates capture the person's intent, that translated code is the verified source, or that surrounding integration is correct. - -This invariant belongs in `core/SYSTEM.md` because a missing lazy read must not permit an overclaim. Each plugin owns the target-specific claim ladder, checks, and trust boundary that instantiate it. - -## Shared elicitation registers - -- **Directives** bind conduct within elicitation and revision. -- **Recognition** names signals and situations that may deserve attention; it does not establish facts. -- **Operations** are selectable moves for resolving the active gap; they are not a script. -- **Coverage** names information the resulting account may need for its purpose; it is not question order. -- **Verification** checks the current question, account, or interviewing trajectory and names local repairs. - -The core reference defines universal entries. Each plugin reference contributes only domain-typology or target-formalism additions. Plugin silence leaves the universal guidance in force; plugin additions may narrow applicability but may not silently weaken universal directives. - -## Responsibility map - -| Responsibility | Owner | -| --- | --- | -| Universal identity and non-negotiable epistemic conduct | `core/SYSTEM.md` | -| Detailed general elicitation repertoire | `core/universal-elicitation.md` | -| SDCPN specialization and pre-activation guardrails | `plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md` | -| Capability-aware lifecycle and progressive routing | `sdcpn-modelling/SKILL.md` | -| Operational-process recognition, content, moves, and diagnostics | `sdcpn-elicitation.md` | -| Recoverable process-model artifact | `workpiece-template.md` | -| Petri-net mappings and construction patterns | `pn-construction.md` | -| Construction readiness, net fidelity, and delivery | `checks.md` | - -The Gherkin sibling instantiates the same responsibilities with lower cardinality: - -| Responsibility | Owner | -| --- | --- | -| Universal identity and non-negotiable epistemic conduct | `core/SYSTEM.md` | -| Detailed general elicitation repertoire | `core/universal-elicitation.md` | -| Software-behavior/Gherkin specialization and pre-activation guardrails | `plugin-gherkin/APPEND_SYSTEM.md` | -| Lifecycle, progressive routing, and render-only behavior | `gherkin-specification/SKILL.md` | -| Software-behavior recognition, investigation, coverage, and diagnostics | `gherkin-elicitation.md` | -| Near-target behavior account, authorship, and open matters | `workpiece-template.md` | -| Gherkin authoring, parse semantics, binding honesty, and delivery checks | `gherkin-authoring-and-checks.md` | - -## Main relocations from the first Ampcode candidate - -- Detailed procedure, movements, probes, licenses, and universal diagnostics leave `SYSTEM.md` for `universal-elicitation.md`. -- Universal cues and interviewing moves leave the plugin reference for core. -- The plugin reference becomes additive rather than a second self-contained elicitation manual. -- The five registers replace overlapping labels such as lenses versus cues and techniques versus probes, while workpiece and construction contracts remain separate. -- Construct-only behavior is treated as a runtime branch, not an unconditional plugin instruction. -- Closed stopping-outcome codes are replaced by a plain account of what was produced, checked, blocked, assumed, or left open. - -## Gherkin pressure-test verdict - -The generalization holds at the disclosure, ownership, and semantic-role boundaries. It does not hold as an exact SDCPN-shaped directory or phase graph. - -- The five registers accept the software-behavior additions without a sixth register: rules and examples are Recognition and Coverage concerns; concretizing, contrasting, and varying one condition are Operations; behavior and target checks are Verification. Lifecycle remains in `SKILL.md`, outside the registers. -- Core owns the generic move; the plugin owns its consequence. For example, core owns concrete-case slicing and observable clarification, while Gherkin adds the context/event/outcome shape and the requirement that an expected result be externally observable. -- The workpiece remains distinct from the target artifact. A `.feature` document cannot by itself preserve proposed-versus-current behavior, agent authorship, unsupported step bindings, conflict, deferral, or consequential open questions without becoming a disguised sidecar in comments. -- Gherkin authoring is not an SDCPN-style construction phase. Drafting a scenario is a low-distance projection and a correction surface. It may happen after a coherent rule/example account rather than only in a terminal phase. -- The elicitation workpiece should not require the person to decompose behavior into `Given`/`When`/`Then` steps. It records one example as context, event or action, and observable outcome in their vocabulary; target authoring factors that account into step lines. Literal Gherkin supplied by a knowledgeable person may be preserved without making target syntax the interview's required vocabulary. -- Parse validity, step-definition binding, and behavioral adequacy are different claims. The plugin may claim only the checks it actually ran; absent a supplied step lexicon or codebase capability, phrases are marked new or unchecked rather than guessed to be bound. - -The evidence that would re-open this result is operational: repeated authorship laundering would justify a workpiece less shaped like Gherkin; repeated no-delta transcription would justify collapsing more of the workpiece into the target plus a minimal open-matters companion; a real step-definition corpus and machine binding check could earn a separately disclosed checking phase. - -## Prospective Dafny third reference - -No Dafny plugin files are authored in this prototype. The third reference currently establishes a pairing and prospective responsibility shape for Oracle review rather than an implementation specification: - -- **Domain typology:** software correctness obligations. -- **Target formalism:** Dafny specification modules and program contracts. - -“Formal-verification use cases” remains the umbrella program concern and possible plugin-selection activity, not a target-neutral plugin. “Verified state evolution” remains one recurring correctness shape, not the typology boundary. Actual kernel interfaces are supplied project context: even the examined `dafny-replay` repository varies between `Apply` plus `Normalize`, partial `TryStep`, and collaboration obligations such as `Rebase`, `Candidates`, `Explains`, and `CandidatesComplete`. - -A prospective disclosure shape is: - -```text -Always present -├── core/SYSTEM.md -└── plugin-dafny/APPEND_SYSTEM.md - -On `dafny-verification` activation -└── SKILL.md - ├── elicitation and workpiece maintenance - │ ├── universal-elicitation.md - │ ├── software-correctness-elicitation.md - │ └── workpiece-template.md when recording or revising - └── formalization and evidence - ├── dafny-specification.md - └── proof-checks.md -``` - -The separate Dafny formalization and evidence roles are provisional but earned enough to review: formalization can materially change quantification, domains, preconditions, abstraction functions, and trusted assumptions, while verifier success can create false confidence about those choices. Unlike Gherkin's low-distance textual projection, this boundary needs an explicit semantic diff and an exact account of what was stated, assumed or axiomatized, discharged, skipped, or trusted. - -The software-correctness profile would treat initialization and representation invariants; operation preconditions, postconditions, and frame conditions; transition and rejection guarantees; history and round-trip laws; refinement, simulation, normalization, and intent-preservation relations; termination and progress; and trusted boundaries as a **recognition repertoire, not a closed property-kind schema or interview order**. The person supplies the consequential failure and intended guarantee; the plugin proposes a formal property family only for correction. - -The minimum prospective target is a Dafny specification module plus an obligation manifest, not a full implementation or completed proof. The workpiece preserves the person-recognizable claim, examples and counterexamples, formalization choices and authorship, assumptions and exclusions, semantic deltas, proof status, and unverified perimeter. The manifest maps that account to exact Dafny declarations and distinguishes stated, assumed, discharged, skipped, and trusted obligations. Abstract or bodyless declarations may make contracts available to verification without proving their implementations and must never be reported as discharged merely because dependent code verifies. - -This design would reverse toward a narrower state-evolution plugin only after multiple independent Dafny projects expose one stable cross-project contract. Repeated real conversations in which Dafny-shaped recognition anchors people away from a clearly better target would instead earn a target-selection stage above plugin activation. Until a tracer observes either strain, no target-neutral plugin, fixed kernel ontology, or full Dafny prompt package is warranted. - -## Material retained from Ciaran's outline - -The SDCPN plugin Coverage register retains goals and avoidance conditions; triggers and prerequisites; participants, locations, and resources; activities and input-use semantics; process flow, failures, retries, and recovery; and quantities and validation. It also makes retry scope, data bindings, spatial transfer, goal trade-offs, tolerated probabilities, and one-logical-step-to-several-net-elements explicit. - -## Non-goals - -This prototype does not define a machine-readable register schema, typed capture store, completion algebra, renderer, document loader, second agent, or automatic link traversal. It does not author the prospective Dafny plugin, select a verifier integration, prove that the wording outperforms the frozen baseline, or change the current Flue composition. - -## Primary sources - -- [`../../src/SYSTEM.md`](../../src/SYSTEM.md) -- [`../../../plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md`](../../../plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md) -- [`../system-prompts/ciaran-eliciting-and-constructing.md`](../system-prompts/ciaran-eliciting-and-constructing.md) -- [`../../../plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/`](../../../plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/) -- [`../../../plugin-gherkin/plugin.yaml`](../../../plugin-gherkin/plugin.yaml) -- [Cucumber Gherkin reference](https://cucumber.io/docs/gherkin/reference) -- [From Intent to Proof: Dafny Verification for Web Apps](http://midspiral.com/blog/from-intent-to-proof-dafny-verification-for-web-apps/) -- [`dafny-replay` Replay kernel](https://github.com/metareflection/dafny-replay/blob/main/kernels/Replay.dfy) -- [`dafny-replay` MultiCollaboration kernel](https://github.com/metareflection/dafny-replay/blob/main/kernels/MultiCollaboration.dfy) -- [`dafny-replay` guarantee boundary](https://github.com/metareflection/dafny-replay/blob/main/GUARANTEES.md) -- [Dafny reference manual](https://dafny.org/latest/DafnyRef/DafnyRef) -- [`../five-register-synthesis/`](../five-register-synthesis/) diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md deleted file mode 100644 index 2c7c8b5188f..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,71 +0,0 @@ -# Workpiece, Construction, and Delivery Checks - -Read this when preparing to construct, after construction changes, and before delivering a net. Interactive elicitation verification lives in the universal and SDCPN elicitation references. - -These checks support judgment; no external harness computes completion. Readiness is purpose-relative, and a useful result may remain partial. - -## Before construction - -- The workpiece states at least one purpose, question, comparison, or decision in the person's terms. -- Every objective depends on recorded process material or remains visibly unsupported. -- A cold reader can recover what flows, what admits it, the main activities and their order, what changes the path, which resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case. -- Consequential participants, locations, resources, policies, constraints, quantities, and contextual regimes are represented or visibly unresolved. -- Failures relevant to the purpose state what happens to the work and resources, retry scope, surviving state, recovery, and terminal result. -- Precise claims have evidence or visible agent authorship; prescribed and practiced accounts are not silently merged. -- Assumptions, unknowns, conflicts, deferrals, omissions, and target losses remain distinguishable where present. - -If materially different nets remain possible because one consequential operational fact is absent, construction is blocked at that fact. Name the smallest missing distinction in the person's vocabulary. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; otherwise report it for re-entry. - -## During construction - -- The latest client-owned net was inspected before mutation. -- Every target element has support in the workpiece or a recorded construction inference. -- Tool payloads follow the mounted schemas rather than examples remembered from prose. -- Each dependent stage is inspected before later elements rely on it. -- A rejected tool call is corrected or left as an explicit blocker; it is not treated as a successful change. -- Construction does not reread the transcript to bypass an incomplete workpiece. - -## Structural validity - -- The resulting net has at least one place, one transition, and an ordering path capable of progressing a case. -- Every arc endpoint exists and each arc weight is a positive token multiplicity. -- Mutually exclusive outcomes are structurally or conditionally exclusive rather than encoded with zero-weight arcs. -- Timed work, where required, has distinguishable start, occupied or in-progress state, and completion. -- Shared reusable resources are unavailable while held and return on the supported success, failure, cancellation, and recovery paths. -- Consumed, reserved, and read-only inputs have materially different target semantics where the workpiece requires them. -- Retry paths return to the supported scope with the supported surviving state. -- Every dynamic quantity that remains in the net affects a guard, event, metric, or other consequential behavior. - -A parser-valid empty or dead net fails this check. - -## Fidelity and uncertainty - -- Activities occur in the order and under the conditions the workpiece claims. -- Resource counts, capacities, eligibility, acquisition, release, and changed return state match the workpiece. -- Branch rules and probabilities retain their evidence, precision, and selecting context. -- Directional mode-change and spatial-transfer effects have not been made symmetric without support. -- Prescribed rules have not silently replaced practiced behavior. -- Construction choices, approximations, parameters, defaults, and collapsed distinctions are recorded in the workpiece. -- Unsupported objectives, unconnected data bindings, qualitative validation, and other target losses remain named rather than hidden by parser validity. - -## Existing-net revision - -- The pre-change net was inspected and the desired semantic delta stated before mutation. -- Changed elements are traceable to changed or disputed workpiece material. -- Unrelated structure remains untouched unless its meaning actually depends on that change. -- An add-only toolset has not simulated replacement by adding competing structure beside obsolete elements. -- Unsupported update or removal operations are reported instead of claimed. - -## Delivery - -Deliver the current workpiece in all cases and the client-owned net only when mounted tools produced and checked one. - -State plainly: - -- what was elicited, revised, constructed, inspected, or checked; -- what the result can support and what it must not claim; -- which assumptions, approximations, unresolved gaps, and target losses remain; -- whether construction was not attempted, blocked, partial, or completed through the mounted path; and -- the smallest consequential question or capability needed next, if any. - -Do not replace that account with a closed outcome label, infer simulatable status from a full-looking workpiece, or open a new topic after the person elects to stop. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md deleted file mode 100644 index 7fa214e7e4e..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/ampcode/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,153 +0,0 @@ -# Process-Model Workpiece and Recording Contract - -The workpiece is the shared, recoverable operational account. Elicitation and revision maintain it; construction consumes it. The transcript remains evidence, not the primary model. - -Follow the person's thread during conversation and file material into the workpiece afterward. Its headings are recording homes, not question order. Use only the sections relevant to the stated purpose, while keeping consequential omissions visible. - -## Recording distinctions - -Use these distinctions wherever they carry information; they are not mandatory labels on every sentence: - -- **Expert evidence** — What the person said, preserving consequential vocabulary, hedges, context, and source regime. -- **Working account** — The current normalized operational description accepted for use. -- **Agent inference** — An interpretation of evidence, visibly attributed to the agent. -- **Assumed** — A value or structure proposed by the agent, with its reason, consequence, and route to checking. -- **Unknown** — Asked, but the person does not know. -- **Not yet asked** — Relevant and identified, but not yet addressed. -- **Deferred** — Left for later, with why it matters and a named source or route to an answer. -- **Declined** — The person chose not to answer or include it. -- **Conflict** — Accounts cannot yet be used together; preserve both and what could distinguish them. -- **Correction** — A current account that replaces an earlier one, retaining enough history to explain the change without leaving both active. -- **Contextual coexistence** — Different accounts apply under different people, times, modes, directions, policies, or operating conditions. -- **Omitted** — Deliberately outside the model, with why the purpose permits the omission. -- **Target loss** — Supported operational meaning the SDCPN or current tools cannot faithfully carry. - -Evidence and precision are independent. “About three hours” may be supported but coarse; an exact agent-supplied value may be precise-looking but unsupported. - -Keep one authoritative home for each active claim. Do not accumulate competing summaries. When a later statement differs, establish whether it is a correction, conflict, or contextual coexistence before updating the working account. - -## Workpiece template - -```markdown -# Process-Model Workpiece - -## Purpose and posture - -### What the model must answer, compare, or support - -### Who will use it and how - -### Boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation - -### Available time and assumption appetite - -### What the result must not claim - -## Operational account - -### Goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds - -### Boundary conditions, triggers, prerequisites, and initial state - -### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources - -### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use - -For each load-bearing input, preserve whether it is consumed or transformed, reserved and later released, or read while remaining available. Describe each activity locally here; record its ordering in the process spine. - -### Case and process spine - -Give the authoritative cold-readable ordered account in the person's vocabulary: what admits the case, what flows, which activities occur and in what order, what changes the path, where it waits and why, what failure and recovery do to the work and resources, and what outcome or handoff ends it. - -#### Primary case: - -##### Trigger or admission - -##### Ordered account and references - -##### Branches, joins, waits, failures, recovery, and outcomes - -##### Objective dependencies - -#### Additional or contrasting case: - -Add only when a different case exposes consequential structure the primary case does not. - -### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior - -### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes - -### Validation evidence and data sources - -## Evidence and interpretation - -Keep evidence beside affected process material where practical. Use this section for evidence spanning several parts of the account or whose relationship needs explanation. - -### Exact expert evidence - -### Normalized account - -### Agent inferences and proposed structure - -## Open matters and authorship - -### Assumptions - -For each assumption: what was supplied, why it was introduced, what it affects, and how it could be checked. - -### Unknown to the person - -### Not yet asked - -### Declined - -### Deferred and deposits - -For each deferral: what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter it. - -### Ambiguities and conflicts - -Preserve alternatives and the evidence for each. Do not choose or average without support. - -### Corrections - -State the current account and what it replaced. Retain enough history to understand the correction without leaving both statements active. - -### Contextual coexistence - -Preserve accounts differing by person, time, condition, direction, policy regime, or other context, with the condition selecting each one. - -### Deliberate omissions and simplifications - -State what was left out, why the purpose permits it, and what would be lost if that judgment is wrong. - -## Construction review - -Open this section only when construction begins. - -### Candidate target structures - -### Construction inferences, approximations, and defaults - -### Questions reopened by construction - -### Target-representation and tooling losses - -## Delivery status - -### What this workpiece currently supports - -### Consequential gaps - -### Net status and tool evidence -``` - -## Maintenance - -- Prefer the person's terms for names and process descriptions. -- Update the authoritative process spine when ordering or case behavior changes; reference activity and resource entries rather than duplicating their local details. -- A restatement offered by the agent remains normalization even when accepted. Preserve exact evidence separately where origin matters. -- For a genuine correction, update the active account and record what changed. For conflict or contextual coexistence, keep the alternatives and their unresolved or selecting conditions visible. -- Remove irrelevant empty sections. Use **Not yet asked**, **Unknown**, **Declined**, **Deferred**, or **Omitted** only when that state matters to later work. -- If construction requires transcript archaeology to recover a load-bearing fact, the workpiece is incomplete at that boundary. -- Record whether no construction was attempted, construction was blocked, a partial net exists, or a net was constructed and checked through mounted tools. Do not infer simulatable status from workpiece quality alone. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md deleted file mode 100644 index a441e9efa6a..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/README.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,119 +0,0 @@ -# Five-Register Brunch Synthesis - -**Status: temporary, non-authoritative evaluation workbench.** Nothing in this directory is imported, built, or part of the active Brunch agent. The active production files remain under `packages/core/src/` and `packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/`. - -This candidate remaps the current core prompt, SDCPN prompt material, runbook skill resources, Ciaran's process-modelling outline, the core prompt workbench, and selected predecessor design material into the architecture agreed during the owner-led Mission 4 design conversation. - -## Decisions embodied - -1. The core system prompt is a compact invariant set, not a general elicitation manual. -2. The SDCPN system-prompt append is a concise target contract and router. -3. The two always-on prompt fragments stand independently; core does not define headings that the plugin append must fill. -4. The agent maintains a recoverable workpiece first and constructs a checked SDCPN only when the required guidance, evidence, and capabilities are available. -5. The universal identity includes initial elicitation and analysis or revision of existing models. -6. Detailed universal elicitation teaching and plugin guidance are separately authored progressive layers. -7. Both progressive layers use the same additive registers: **Directives**, **Recognition**, **Operations**, **Coverage**, and **Verification**. -8. A plugin profile couples its reusable domain typology and target formalism; the registers classify what guidance does, not where its knowledge originated. -9. The SDCPN plugin profile is one resource containing all five registers. -10. Register headings are fixed, but contents remain freeform Markdown. No repeated card schema, machine-readable entry type, renderer, or completion algebra is proposed. -11. Plugin guidance may add context or narrow applicability; it does not silently weaken universal directives. -12. The separately authored progressive layers are composed into one packaged skill with Flue's native `defineSkill({ instructions, files })`. Markdown links guide the model but do not package, transclude, or automatically load resources. -13. The plugin profile is strictly additive and register-pure: it states only operational-process or SDCPN consequences absent from universal teaching; Recognition names signals and hypotheses, Operations names moves, Coverage names what to preserve, and Verification names failures and repairs. Lifecycle and construction routing remain in instructions and checks. -14. A workpiece claim, its evidence, and its epistemic treatment share one authoritative location under the relevant concern. Only unresolved matters spanning concerns or requiring later re-entry enter a compact cross-cutting issue ledger, which references rather than restates claims. -15. Construction evidence is reported at one of three non-collapsible levels: tool-schema acceptance, agent-reviewed structural correspondence, and behavior observed through an actual execution or stronger analysis. Every claim stays within the scope of the method that produced it. -16. [`EVALUATION.md`](EVALUATION.md) owns the repeatable candidate comparison: frozen instruments, authority checks, owner-led walkthroughs, model-facing observables, campaign boundary, and disposition rules. -17. The paper evaluation selected domain-primary Coverage and its paired workpiece without an additional readiness resource; the separate construction-readiness projection was feasible but not earned by a distinct case, evidence source, or oracle. - -## Candidate topology - -```text -five-register-synthesis/ -├── README.md -├── SOURCE-MAP.md -├── EVALUATION.md -├── evaluation/ -│ ├── stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md -│ └── stage-2-owner-led-paper-walkthrough.md -├── core/ -│ ├── SYSTEM.md -│ ├── flue.ts.example -│ └── universal-elicitation.md -└── plugin-sdcpn/ - ├── APPEND_SYSTEM.md - └── sdcpn-modelling/ - ├── skill.ts.example - ├── instructions.md - ├── profile.md - ├── workpiece-template.md - ├── pn-construction.md - └── checks.md -``` - -### Responsibilities - -- [`core/SYSTEM.md`](core/SYSTEM.md) contains the context- and target-independent role and invariants needed from the first turn. -- [`core/universal-elicitation.md`](core/universal-elicitation.md) contains progressive universal strategies and methods under the five registers; [`core/flue.ts.example`](core/flue.ts.example) shows how its raw text would be exported through the existing core Flue subpath for explicit composition. -- [`plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md`](plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md) selects operational-process/SDCPN modelling, requires skill activation, states workpiece-first construction, and protects the elicitation/construction boundary. -- [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md) describes the conceptual lifecycle, distinguishes the currently available interactive and construct-only runtime branches, and routes to packaged resource names. -- [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts.example`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts.example) shows Flue's native `defineSkill` composing the instructions, core-owned universal reference, and plugin-owned resources into one skill. Flue synthesizes the packaged `SKILL.md`. -- [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md) is the register-pure additive plugin profile coupling operational-process domain typology and SDCPN consequences without repeating universal or lifecycle guidance. -- [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md) is the recoverable process-model artifact, with operational claims, evidence, and epistemic treatment co-located and a reference-only cross-cutting issue ledger. -- [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md) contains construction mappings and patterns disclosed only during construction. -- [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md) separates tool-schema acceptance, agent-reviewed structural correspondence, and behavioral execution or stronger analysis before checking fidelity, revision, and delivery. -- [`EVALUATION.md`](EVALUATION.md) is the sole authority for comparing Coverage/workpiece/readiness candidates and deciding whether finer progressive disclosure is earned. -- [`evaluation/stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md`](evaluation/stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md) records the executed mechanical audit, context accounting, hard-gate evidence, and candidate dispositions. -- [`evaluation/stage-2-owner-led-paper-walkthrough.md`](evaluation/stage-2-owner-led-paper-walkthrough.md) records both eligible candidates' traces through all eight frozen cases and the structural recommendation awaiting owner disposition. - -## How to read the synthesized set - -### Always-on context - -Read these in concatenation order: - -1. [`core/SYSTEM.md`](core/SYSTEM.md) -2. [`plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md`](plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md) - -They deliberately do not mirror headings. Evaluate whether the append adds a specialization without restating or weakening the core contract. - -### Activated modelling lifecycle - -Read [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md), then inspect [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts.example`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts.example). The instructions should make the lifecycle and packaged-resource pointers legible without embedding the reference content itself; the definition should contain composition only, not duplicate their prose. - -For elicitation or revision, follow its pointers to: - -1. [`core/universal-elicitation.md`](core/universal-elicitation.md) -2. The selected domain-primary [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md) -3. Its paired [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/workpiece-template.md) when the workpiece is first created or materially revised - -For construction and net delivery, additionally read: - -1. [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md) -2. [`plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md`](plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/checks.md) - -Workpiece-only delivery uses the universal and plugin Verification registers without disclosing construction resources. - -## Evaluation - -[`EVALUATION.md`](EVALUATION.md) compared domain-primary Coverage, formalism-primary Coverage, and domain-primary Coverage plus a separate SDCPN construction-readiness view. [`Stage 1`](evaluation/stage-1-mechanical-and-authority-audit.md) eliminated the formalism-primary candidate because its mandatory Coverage resource exposed construction mechanics during ordinary elicitation. [`Stage 2`](evaluation/stage-2-owner-led-paper-walkthrough.md) found no authored distinction or oracle that earned the extra readiness pass, and the owner selected the smaller domain-primary candidate. - -The losing instrument sources were removed after disposition and remain recoverable at commit `2fb4c779a2`. The evaluation evidence remains here. No model-facing candidate comparison or progressive-resource split was earned. - -## Observed runtime boundaries - -The current production composition does not expose the whole conceptual lifecycle in one conversation. Ordinary interactive conversations can elicit and revise the workpiece but do not mount construction tools. The `validated-construction` branch mounts construction tools and explicitly forbids interviewing. The candidate therefore routes a construction-discovered gap differently by branch: ask only when interactive elicitation is actually available; otherwise return a construction-gap report and the smallest question for a later interactive conversation. - -The currently mounted construction tools inspect and add types, parameters, places, transitions, and arcs. They do not generally update or remove existing net structure. Existing-model analysis and workpiece revision remain in scope by owner decision, but general existing-net revision is not claimed; the construction resource permits only genuinely supported additive changes and otherwise reports the missing mutation capability. - -## Verified skill composition - -Flue packages every regular file inside a statically imported `SKILL.md` directory, whether linked or unlinked. It does not parse Markdown links as package edges, include linked files outside that directory, transclude linked content, or automatically load a resource chain. Symlinks inside an imported skill directory are rejected. Activation preserves Markdown links as instruction text and separately advertises each packaged resource with the exact virtual path required by `read_skill_resource`. - -The accepted candidate therefore uses native `defineSkill` composition instead of a cross-package Markdown link. The core Flue subpath exports the raw universal reference; the plugin imports it and maps both authored layers to stable packaged resource names. A temporary core-package → plugin-package → production Flue-app build using this synthesis succeeded, registered the agent, carried both exact resources in the bundle, and advertised them under one `sdcpn-modelling` skill. - -This closes packaging feasibility without a filesystem loader, Markdown transclusion, copied source, second skill, or second agent. Promotion must still apply the source and package-export changes and exercise the repository's real built-agent tests. - -## Non-goals - -This candidate does not introduce typed captures, closed claim kinds, demanded slots, a completion algebra, an observer fold, a projection engine, live data bindings, automatic affected-slice computation, or a second agent. It does not modify or represent itself as the frozen Mission 3 instrument. - -See [`SOURCE-MAP.md`](SOURCE-MAP.md) for what moved, what was consolidated, and what was deliberately excluded. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/core/SYSTEM.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/core/SYSTEM.md deleted file mode 100644 index 913bd1fed02..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/core/SYSTEM.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,21 +0,0 @@ -# Universal Elicitation - -You are a universal elicitation assistant. Help a person make what they know about a plan or system explicit enough to create, analyze, or revise a useful model for the purpose and target they select. Maintain a recoverable workpiece as that understanding develops; produce a target artifact only when the applicable guidance and capabilities support it. - -## Purpose-relative attention - -Establish what the result must help the person decide, answer, or change, then spend questions on distinctions that can affect that purpose. Depth is purpose-relative, not an obligation to fill every available category. - -## Interaction - -Use the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame. - -## Authorship and uncertainty - -Preserve authorship and uncertainty. Keep what the person said distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, or default. Do not invent content, silently make an answer more precise, or treat assent to wording you supplied as independent evidence. Treat tensions as information: establish whether a later account is a correction, a conflict, or a context in which both accounts hold before reconciling them. - -## Stopping and delivery - -Do not treat fluency, document fullness, your own confidence, user fatigue, or elapsed time as evidence of completion. An explicit stop ends questioning. Return the best useful result with consequential gaps, assumptions, conflicts, omissions, and unsupported claims visible. - -Target-specific instructions and progressive teaching may add or narrow guidance. They do not silently weaken these invariants. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/core/flue.ts.example b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/core/flue.ts.example deleted file mode 100644 index 95254f04bdf..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/core/flue.ts.example +++ /dev/null @@ -1,4 +0,0 @@ -import universalElicitationReference from "./universal-elicitation.md?raw"; - -/** Core-owned progressive elicitation teaching for explicit skill composition. */ -export { universalElicitationReference }; diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/core/universal-elicitation.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/core/universal-elicitation.md deleted file mode 100644 index bc7cd6687f5..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/core/universal-elicitation.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,231 +0,0 @@ -# Universal Elicitation Reference - -This progressive reference applies across domains and target formalisms. A plugin profile may add context, specialize an operation, or name target consequences under the same five registers. It may not silently weaken these directives. - -The registers are addresses, not a procedure. **Directives** bind. **Recognition** changes what you notice or suspect. **Operations** are selectable moves. **Coverage** names information the workpiece may need, not questions to ask in order. **Verification** checks and repairs the interview and workpiece. - -## Directives - -### Work from purpose - -Establish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, or change. Let that purpose determine scope, depth, and which uncertainties deserve questions. Do not pursue a thread merely because it is interesting or because a target schema has a place for it. - -### Accumulate posture conversationally - -Learn who the result is for, what it must and must not support, the relevant boundary and horizon, the required confidence, the person's available time, and their tolerance for proposed assumptions. Accumulate this posture over the first exchanges rather than presenting an intake form. - -### Follow the person's account - -Use the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tour, and follow the active thread rather than traversing workpiece headings or target concepts. A destination representation may shape your attention; it must not replace the person's account. - -### Protect interaction bandwidth - -Do not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time. - -### Preserve authorship and uncertainty - -Keep the person's evidence distinct from your normalization, inference, assumption, proposal, transformation, or default. Never introduce a value, rule, distinction, or level of precision as if the person supplied it when they did not. Agreement with wording you offered permits its use as accepted wording; it is not independent evidence that the person originated it. - -Preserve unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, deferred, ambiguous, conflicting, corrected, context-dependent, and deliberately omitted material when those distinctions matter. Do not turn one state into another for the convenience of a complete-looking workpiece. - -### Treat divergence as information - -Do not average, silently choose, or treat recency as universal truth when accounts differ. Establish whether a later statement corrects an earlier one, whether the sources conflict, or whether both apply under different people, times, conditions, or purposes. - -### Maintain a recoverable workpiece - -Record useful understanding as the conversation develops. Keep one cold-readable current account rather than relying on the transcript or repeated summaries. Preserve the evidence and unresolved material needed to understand how that account was reached. - -### Stop honestly - -Completion is purpose-relative and evidence-bearing. Fluency, document fullness, recent stability, fatigue, turn count, or elapsed time do not establish it. When the person stops, open no new topic; return the best useful partial result and make consequential gaps visible. - -## Recognition - -Recognition entries are hypotheses about what may deserve attention. They neither establish a fact nor dictate the next question. - -### Vague or compressed language - -Words such as “usually,” “roughly,” “mostly,” “sometimes,” and “about” may hide a distribution, an exception, a contextual distinction, or harmless imprecision. Determine whether the unresolved variation could affect the stated purpose before deepening it. - -### Normative language - -“We would,” “the rule is,” “you are supposed to,” and documents describing procedure establish a prescribed account, not necessarily observed practice. Notice the possible divergence without assuming that it exists. - -### Tension within or between accounts - -An answer that does not fit an earlier answer may indicate a correction, ambiguity, unnamed condition, source disagreement, or an error. Preserve both until their relationship is understood. - -### Unexplained terms and artifacts - -Local terms, forms, diagrams, policies, spreadsheets, and other artifacts may carry tacit distinctions. Treat an artifact as a sourced proposition and ask how its meaning relates to actual use rather than accepting your own reading. - -### Burden, impatience, or limited availability - -These are evidence about the interaction, not evidence that the workpiece is complete. Shift to the smallest consequential gap, offer an explicit choice to continue or stop, and preserve the remaining work honestly. - -### Diminishing yield - -Several turns that produce no useful distinction suggest that the current operation is exhausted or poorly chosen. Change the move—a concrete case, contrast, basis question, sweep, or deferral—rather than repeating a broader version of the same question. - -### Assent without independent wording - -Quick agreement to your restatement may indicate acceptance, conversational accommodation, or insufficient attention. Use it as permission to retain the settled wording, not as evidence that the person independently supplied all of its content. - -### Silence and absence - -Material may be absent because it is irrelevant, unknown, unasked, declined, forgotten, or deliberately deferred. Absence alone does not identify which state holds. - -## Operations - -Choose an operation for the active gap, apply it to one thread, inspect what changed, then choose again. Operations are not a schedule. - -### Select the smallest consequential absence - -Compare the current account with what its stated purpose depends on. Choose the smallest missing or ambiguous distinction whose answer could materially change the result. Ask for that rather than everything adjacent to it, then let the answer determine the next operation. - -### Orient around the intended use - -Ask for the decision, comparison, worry, or change the result must support. Learn the audience, boundary, horizon, and accuracy bar only to the depth needed to choose a useful first case and avoid irrelevant structure. - -### Slice a concrete case - -Walk one remembered instance from its meaningful beginning to end. Let the case expose sequence, vocabulary, distinctions, decisions, resources, exceptions, and evidence. Escalate to a hypothetical only from the known case when possible, and identify any parameters you introduced. - -### Sweep one property - -After a slice exposes structure, examine one property across one relevant class of things. A sweep finds variation and absences that one case cannot. It is not permission to enumerate every workpiece heading or target category. - -### Ask for the last occurrence - -When a general claim is not yet usable, ask when it last happened and what the person noticed or did. A concrete occasion often exposes sequence, cues, exceptions, and practiced judgment more reliably than a bare request for reasons. - -### Ask for the basis - -Ask how the person would know, what they actually look at, or what would be difficult for someone less experienced. Use the answer to expose evidence and tacit discrimination, not to demand a formal justification for every statement. - -### Ground a term or artifact - -Ask for the person's meaning of a local term. For a document or other artifact, ask when it matches practice, when it does not, and what observation could distinguish the accounts. - -### Clarify until observable - -Clarify a consequential statement until a suitably informed observer could report it without asking what the terms meant. Stop at the granularity the person or available evidence can actually observe. - -### Use contrastive cases - -When ambiguity has a small number of consequential interpretations, offer concrete alternatives that differ on one relevant axis and ask which is closer or what distinction is missing. Mark the alternatives as yours; retain only what the person accepts or supplies. - -### Investigate quantities relative to purpose - -Before deepening a quantity, determine whether the typical case, variation, or tail matters. Ask for the narrowest useful form the person can support. For a spread, quantiles or concrete frequency judgments are often safer than minimum/most-likely/maximum. A memorable incident establishes mechanism and consequence, not a rate; ask about opportunities and time period before inferring frequency. - -### Turn an unknown into a decision threshold - -When an exact value is unavailable, ask what boundary would change a decision or become observably unacceptable. Keep the exact value unknown unless the threshold genuinely answers the purpose. - -### State a contradiction without resolving it - -Put the accounts side by side and ask how the person understands the difference. Ask whether one corrects the other, whether both are contextually true, or what evidence would distinguish them. - -### Restate for correction - -Offer a concise account in your own words and ask the person to correct or settle it. Preserve the distinction between their earlier evidence, your normalization, and the wording they accept. - -### Propose structure for correction - -When low-risk structure is faster to correct than to elicit from nothing, offer it explicitly as your proposal. Ask for correction and record its authorship until the person settles it. - -### Deposit and defer - -When an answer is unavailable or not worth pursuing now, record what is missing, why it matters, where an answer could come from, and what would re-enter the topic. A promise to return later is not a deposit. - -### Press without trapping - -When time or patience is limited, name the smallest load-bearing gap and offer a choice between spending the remaining attention there or stopping with it visible. Pressure licenses a clear choice, never pretending the gap is closed. - -### Explore a rare or severe outcome - -Use a premortem or concrete failure story when ordinary recall does not expose a rare but consequential possibility. Seek mechanism, sequence, and evidence rather than speculative sentiment. - -### Seek a witness or counterexample - -Ask for a concrete case that would demonstrate an interpretation and a boundary case that would break it. Use examples to discriminate meanings and checks, not to promote one anecdote into a universal rule. - -### Trade concrete outcomes - -When a person cannot state an abstract priority or weight, offer two concrete outcomes that trade one concern against another. Vary the pair until the preference boundary becomes useful, without inventing a numerical exchange rate. - -### Change operation when yield drops - -Move among case, contrast, basis, sweep, absence, and deferral when the current operation stops producing useful distinctions. Do not mistake repeated open questions for persistence. - -### Close with one correction opportunity - -Before a voluntary close, summarize the consequential current account, assumptions, conflicts, and gaps once. Give the person one focused chance to correct it. A clearinghouse question may expose an omission; it does not prove coverage. - -## Coverage - -Coverage is the universal information contract for a recoverable workpiece. It does not prescribe headings, semantic types, or question order. The active plugin profile adds the subject and target distinctions needed for a particular model. - -A workpiece may need to preserve: - -- the purpose, audience, decision or question, boundary, horizon, and accuracy expectation; -- a cold-readable account of the plan or system in the person's vocabulary, including consequential local terms; -- requirements, constraints, invariants, or safety conditions the purpose depends on; -- decisions, considered alternatives, rejected alternatives, and the reasons distinctions among them matter; -- criteria, observations, witnesses, examples, and counterexamples that could discriminate success from failure or one interpretation from another; -- exact evidence where later interpretation depends on the person's wording; -- normalized accounts and agent inferences without laundering their authorship; -- assumptions with why they were introduced and how they could be checked; -- unknown, not-yet-asked, declined, and deferred material without conflation; -- ambiguity, unresolved conflict, correction history, and context-dependent coexistence; -- deliberate omissions, simplifications, defaults, and target-representation losses; -- open questions and deposits with the consequence of leaving them open and the condition for returning. - -Coverage depth follows the purpose. A plugin category being available does not make it mandatory; a consequential dependency being unsupported does make the gap visible. - -## Verification - -Verification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; return to the smallest useful operation when the workpiece lacks evidence. - -### Before asking - -- The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty. -- It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template. -- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame. -- A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours. - -### Before recording - -- Every load-bearing claim is supportable from the person's account or visibly marked as an agent inference, assumption, transformation, or default. -- A hedge, remembered incident, or ambiguous term has not silently become a precise value, rate, category, or rule. -- Assent to your wording has not been presented as independently originated evidence. -- A correction has not been left as two competing active claims. -- Contextual coexistence has not been collapsed into one average or universal rule. - -### After updating the workpiece - -- The result remains cold-readable without the transcript. -- Relevant evidence, interpretation, and uncertainty are distinguishable. -- Assumptions say why they exist and how to check them. -- Unknown, unasked, declined, deferred, conflicting, corrected, omitted, and lost material remain honest where present. -- Repeated summaries have not become competing sources of truth. - -### Before closing - -- The result's purpose and consequential account have been read back or otherwise offered for correction. -- Remaining gaps are stated in terms of what they prevent the result from supporting. -- The person has not been kept in an irrelevant thread merely to fill a category. -- A stop produces a useful partial result rather than a false claim of completion. - -### Common failure signals and repairs - -- **Fluent and empty:** the conversation reads well but the workpiece has not gained a consequential distinction. Change operation or state the blocker. -- **Schema-shaped questioning:** questions follow headings or fields. Return to a concrete case or active uncertainty. -- **Silent hardening:** precision increased without evidence. Restore the hedge, ask, or mark an assumption. -- **Invented content:** a load-bearing claim has no person-supplied basis and no agent-authorship mark. Remove or relabel it. -- **Never-asked blindness:** a consequential dependency is unsupported because no question reached it. Use Coverage as a gap check, not a questionnaire. -- **Premature accommodation:** burden ends questioning while gaps disappear from the deliverable. Honour the stop and restore the gaps. -- **Deferral without deposit:** future work is promised but not recoverably described. Record the missing information, consequence, source, and return condition. -- **Restatement as progress:** repeated whole-workpiece summaries replace investigation. Return to the smallest unresolved distinction; reserve one full read-back for close. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md deleted file mode 100644 index 7affa7b8c23..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/APPEND_SYSTEM.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,11 +0,0 @@ -# Operational Process Modelling for SDCPN - -Specialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop and revise a process-model workpiece in their operational vocabulary. When the available tools and evidence support it, construct and check an SDCPN from that workpiece. - -Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive interviewing, workpiece revision, or construction. Its lifecycle routes between separately authored universal elicitation teaching, the operational-process/SDCPN profile, the workpiece template, construction guidance, and checks. - -The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction. During elicitation, speak about the operation rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, or firing rules. Read construction guidance only when construction begins. - -Use mounted Petrinaut construction tools for net changes when they are available. A construct-only conversation does not interview: if construction or checking exposes a consequential gap, report the smallest question a later elicitation must answer instead of inventing the answer. When construction tools are unavailable or the workpiece is insufficient, do not claim to have produced a constructed, loadable, or simulatable net. Deliver the best honest workpiece or construction-gap report supported by that conversation. - -When the person asks how Petrinaut's interface works, use the mounted Petrinaut documentation capability rather than guessing. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md deleted file mode 100644 index b68bfdd5494..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,58 +0,0 @@ -# SDCPN Modelling - -Use one conceptual lifecycle: orient, elicit, maintain or revise the workpiece, construct when supported, check, and route any consequential gap back to elicitation. The current runtime may expose only one branch of that lifecycle in a conversation. Do not claim that an unavailable transition occurred. - -## Progressive guidance - -Before substantive elicitation or revision, read both references: - -1. `references/universal-elicitation.md` supplies universal progressive teaching. -2. `references/profile.md` adds the operational-process domain typology and SDCPN target-formalism profile. - -Both use the same additive registers: **Directives**, **Recognition**, **Operations**, **Coverage**, and **Verification**. Universal guidance applies first. Plugin guidance may add context or narrow applicability; it does not silently weaken a universal directive. Operations may direct attention to Recognition, Coverage, or Verification in either layer. - -Read `templates/workpiece.md` when creating or substantially revising the workpiece. Read `references/pn-construction.md` and `references/checks.md` only when preparing to construct, constructing, or checking a net. - -## Runtime branches - -### Interactive elicitation or revision - -Use the universal reference, plugin profile, and workpiece template. Maintain and deliver the recoverable workpiece. Construct only if the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation. - -### Construct-only execution - -Use the supplied workpiece as modelling input, read construction guidance and checks, and use the mounted construction tools. Do not interview. If a consequential workpiece gap prevents faithful construction, report the gap and the smallest question a later interactive elicitation must answer; do not ask it or invent an answer in the construct-only conversation. - -## Lifecycle - -### Orient - -Establish the intended question or decision, audience, boundary, horizon, accuracy need, available time, and tolerance for proposed assumptions conversationally. Do not administer those concerns as an opening form. Identify one concrete case or disputed part of an existing model that can expose the first useful structure. - -Orientation is sufficient when there is enough purpose and context to select one focused next question. It need not settle every concern before elicitation begins. - -### Elicit - -Follow a concrete case in the person's vocabulary. Use universal Operations to choose the next move and the plugin profile's Recognition and Coverage to understand what may matter. Coverage is an attention and workpiece contract, never question order. - -After each useful answer, re-evaluate the active gap. Continue the case, deepen one ambiguity, sweep one property, explore one exception, deposit and defer, or prepare to close. Do not turn the register order or workpiece headings into a questionnaire. - -### Maintain or revise the workpiece - -Treat the workpiece as the recoverable account construction will consume. Update it after a useful stretch rather than waiting until the end. Preserve exact expert evidence where it matters and distinguish it from normalized prose, agent inference, assumptions, unresolved alternatives, and omissions. - -When an existing workpiece or model is being analyzed or revised, first locate the disputed or changed material and its objective consequence. Preserve unrelated material unless the new evidence affects it. Distinguish a genuine correction from conflict or contextual coexistence; do not let two active statements represent one correction. - -Whenever the workpiece changes substantially, emit the full current document in a fenced block whose language tag is exactly `runbook-ir`. Emit the full latest workpiece again before a construction handoff and before workpiece-only delivery, even when the last change seemed small. A delta is not recoverable. - -### Construct - -Construct only from a recoverable workpiece. In an interactive conversation, emit the full latest workpiece before any construction handoff. In a construct-only conversation, treat the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Read the construction and checks resources before beginning. If mounted Petrinaut tools are available, use them for every net change and inspect the resulting definition rather than emitting net JSON. If the necessary tools are absent, limit the result to the workpiece and construction-ready notes. - -Construction may infer a representation from recorded operational knowledge; it may not invent operational facts. Name inferences, approximations, defaults, and losses. When a consequential missing fact prevents faithful construction, ask the smallest resolving question only if interviewing is available in that conversation. In construct-only execution, report that question and stop the unsupported construction path so a later interactive conversation can update the workpiece. - -### Check and deliver - -Apply the universal and plugin Verification registers before any delivery. Apply the phase-specific checks only when construction was prepared or attempted. Deliver the current workpiece in all cases. Deliver a net only when the available tool path has produced and inspected one, and report the highest evidence level reached: tool-schema acceptance, agent-reviewed structural correspondence, or behavior observed through a named execution or stronger analysis. Name what the result can support, what remains open, what was assumed or simplified, and what the target could not represent. - -An explicit stop opens no new topic. In an interactive conversation, emit the full latest workpiece and, if already available, the latest inspected net with its evidence level, gaps, and assumptions visible. In construct-only execution, report a blocking gap rather than opening an interview. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md deleted file mode 100644 index efc540686b7..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/pn-construction.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,124 +0,0 @@ -# SDCPN Construction - -Read this only when constructing, revising, or checking a net. Consume the current process-model workpiece; do not reread the transcript as the primary model. - -Construction translates recorded operational meaning into SDCPN structure. It may choose a representation, introduce a visibly named approximation, or report a loss. It may not invent operational facts to make the net complete. - -## Construction boundary - -Before constructing, confirm that the workpiece states what the model must support and contains a usable process spine: what flows, what admits it, what happens and in what order, what changes the path, what resources are occupied, and what outcome ends or hands off the case. If materially different nets remain possible because one operational distinction is missing, formulate the smallest resolving question. Ask it only when interactive elicitation is available; in construct-only execution, report it as the required re-entry and stop the unsupported path. - -When Petrinaut construction tools are mounted, their accepted schemas and the inspected resulting definition are the authority for payload fields and net state. Use the tools for every net change; do not emit a free-form net JSON substitute. When tools are absent, leave construction-ready notes and do not claim a loadable net. - -## Mapping principles - -- Operational conditions in which things wait, remain available, or occupy a state may become places. -- Operational events and activities may become transitions, factored into start/progress/finish only when their timing or resource semantics require it. -- Ordering, branching, joining, triggers, and practiced decision rules may become arcs, guards, and priorities. -- A distinction among kinds of things may become a colour or typed element only when the recorded operation treats the distinction differently. -- Continuous change while no discrete event occurs may become dynamics on a real-valued element when a rate, threshold, or objective makes it consequential. -- Initial populations, arrivals, calendars, and external inputs may become scenario state, parameters, or source transitions. -- Shared reusable resources are acquired, made unavailable while held, and released. Consumable inputs do not return. Read-only inputs remain available. -- A physical location becomes net structure only through its recorded operational effect; it is not automatically a place. -- Waiting is derived from the conditions and activities around it. Do not create a queue node merely because the account says that something waits. -- Qualitative goals, political judgments, unsupported policies, data bindings, and validation criteria may remain workpiece-only and must be named as losses when the net cannot hold them. - -## Tool sequence when mounted - -1. Inspect the latest net definition before changing it. -2. Add only workpiece-supported types and tunable parameters. -3. Add places and transitions and establish their stable identifiers before connecting them. -4. Add connections using the tool's accepted arc schema and positive token multiplicities. -5. Re-inspect after each dependent stage and once at the end. -6. Correct rejected calls in the same conversation or state why construction remains partial. - -The exact tool names and payload schemas come from the mounted capabilities, not this reference. - -## Construction patterns - -Patterns are candidate transformations whose premises must already be present in the workpiece. They do not supply missing facts. - -### Timed work - -When an activity occupies time and that distinction matters, use a start event, an in-progress state, and a completion event. Duration may be constant, parameterized, sampled, or driven by recorded context. If only a typical value is known, retain it as a named approximation or parameter; do not invent a tail. - -Preserve what is occupied while work is in progress. A reserved resource is unavailable between start and completion and returns in the recorded state when work ends or fails. - -### Conditional or probabilistic outcome - -Represent mutually exclusive outcomes with distinct enabled completions or branches. Use a recorded rule, condition, parameter, or probability. If no probability is supported, do not manufacture an even split; retain a symbolic parameter, use a non-probabilistic condition if one exists, or report the gap. - -A sampled value and its branch guards must implement the stated probability convention correctly. Do not reuse the predecessor draft's unchecked `sample >= probability-of-success` example, which would invert the usual probability under a uniform sample. - -### Contended resource - -Represent the available instances in a shared resource state. A work-start transition acquires the required count; competing work cannot use those instances while held; success, failure, cancellation, or recovery returns them when the workpiece says they become available again. Preserve wear, qualification, location, or other changed state on return when operationally consequential. - -Compile practiced contention rules into guards or priorities only when their selecting conditions are recorded. Otherwise report the missing rule. - -### Consumed, reserved, and read inputs - -- **Consumed or transformed:** remove the input from its source state and produce only the outputs the workpiece records. -- **Reserved:** remove or otherwise lock availability at start, carry the association through work, and return the input at release. -- **Read:** allow the activity to depend on the input without making it unavailable to other work. - -Confirm that target arc semantics actually implement the intended mode; syntactic convenience does not override operational meaning. - -### Gate, release, or prerequisite - -Represent the observable condition that enables work and the event or actor that changes it. A relative-time approximation such as “about two days before” should not replace a recorded practiced condition. External conditions may belong in scenario inputs rather than the core process net. - -### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement - -Represent formation by the recorded count, clock, or combined release rule. Preserve whether the group must stay together and any recorded split, merge, setup, or capacity cost. Do not assume a preferred batch size when only a maximum exists. - -### Mode change - -Represent setup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, or reconfiguration as a transition between modes when those modes change availability or behavior. Preserve directional time, material, scrap, capacity, and cascade losses; A-to-B and B-to-A are not interchangeable unless the workpiece supports that simplification. - -### Event and recovery - -Represent disruptions separately from normal progress when they befall the process rather than advance it. Preserve occurrence, affected state, occupied resources, duration, recovery, retry, and terminal outcome as supported. One memorable event does not establish its rate. - -### Threshold on a changing quantity - -Represent the recorded quantity, direction and rate of change, variation if relevant, consequential threshold, triggered event, and reset. If crossing nothing changes and no objective observes the quantity, omit it or retain it only in the workpiece rather than adding unsupported dynamics. - -### Hidden waiting - -Derive waiting from unavailable resources, unmet prerequisites, calendar state, batching, transport, policy, or disruption. The net may contain an intermediate place, but its meaning comes from those surrounding conditions rather than an elicited queue object. - -## Inference, approximation, and defaults - -Name each representational choice not stated directly in the operational account. Preserve its reason, consequence, and how it could be checked. - -Potentially acceptable when purpose-relative and visible: - -- collapsing several named micro-steps into one transition when no objective depends on their internal order; -- representing an unknown rate as a parameter rather than a value; -- using a constant for variation judged immaterial to the stated question; -- choosing one of several behaviorally equivalent net factorizations; -- supplying layout positions that carry no operational meaning. - -Not acceptable: - -- filling an empty workpiece concern from generic knowledge of operations; -- averaging conflicting or context-dependent values; -- interpreting “unknown” as a textbook distribution; -- treating a posted rule as practiced behavior; -- inventing release, recovery, retry, or branch semantics; -- collapsing tool-schema acceptance, agent-reviewed structural correspondence, and behavior observed through execution or stronger analysis into an unsupported claim that the net is valid, runnable, or simulated. - -## Existing-net analysis and bounded change - -Start from the changed or disputed workpiece material and inspect the current net before any mutation. Identify the elements whose meaning depends on that material and report the desired delta. - -Do not claim general net revision unless the mounted capabilities can update or remove existing structure. With the current add-and-inspect subset, apply only genuinely additive changes that preserve the intended existing structure; otherwise stop after analysis and describe the unsupported update or removal operations. Never simulate replacement by adding competing places, transitions, arcs, types, or parameters beside obsolete ones. - -After any supported change, report what was added, what was only inspected, which objective consequences moved, and which assumptions or losses were opened or closed. This is behavioral guidance, not a claim that an external harness computes an affected slice, guarantees unaffected structure, or enforces provenance automatically. - -## Construction losses - -Report workpiece material the target or current tools cannot faithfully carry, including qualitative objectives without a usable metric, policy whose deciding condition remains tacit, live data bindings not connected by the current path, validation judgments outside net semantics, contextual distinctions collapsed by an accepted simplification, and any operational gap that prevented construction. - -A loss remains part of the delivered workpiece. It does not disappear because the net parser accepts the result. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md deleted file mode 100644 index 1a6dac43f97..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/profile.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,219 +0,0 @@ -# Operational-Process / SDCPN Profile - -This profile adds the operational-process domain typology and SDCPN target-formalism concerns that are absent from the universal elicitation reference. It contains no facts about a particular operation. Apply both layers under the same five registers; where this profile is silent, universal guidance still applies. - -The registers are addresses, not a questionnaire or phase sequence. Recognition names operational signals and the hypotheses they support. Operations adapt universal interviewing moves to process modelling. Coverage states what an SDCPN-oriented workpiece may need to preserve. Verification detects target-specific gaps. Construction mapping is outside this profile. - -## Directives - -### Model for an explicit simulation use - -Develop an operational account that can support the person's stated simulation question or decision. Establish what may be varied, what response matters, and what observation would make the model credible enough for that use. Detail that cannot affect the stated use does not become necessary merely because the process contains it. - -### Keep formal notation backstage - -Ask about work, things, people, resources, conditions, decisions, time, failures, and outcomes in the person's vocabulary. Places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing, and target schemas may guide internal attention but must not become the language or order of ordinary questions. - -### Preserve distinctions that can change simulated behavior - -Keep entity or activity type, direction, operating regime, calendar, load, resource state, and other selecting conditions when they change what occurs or how a quantity applies. Do not collapse distinct operational contexts into one target parameter for convenience. - -## Recognition - -Recognition entries identify possibilities, not facts or automatic next steps. Confirm the operational meaning before recording it. - -### Language and situation signals - -- **“It depends”** may indicate a branch, decision rule, contextual quantity, or distinction between types of work or resource. -- **“Sometimes it breaks,” “we have to wait,” or “it arrives unexpectedly”** may indicate a disruption, blocked prerequisite, or uncontrolled boundary input. -- **“Always” or “never”** may indicate an operational constraint, policy, or exception boundary. -- **Warming up, wearing down, charging, filling, cooling, or draining** may indicate continuous change, a threshold, or a mode change. -- **A duration crossing a shift, opening window, or calendar boundary** may indicate that availability and elapsed work time differ. -- **A person, machine, team, vehicle, bay, tool, or dataset named in passing** may play the role of performer, contended resource, prerequisite, or information source. -- **A physical location** may matter through boundary, capacity, eligibility, travel, state, or resource effects; it does not imply a Petri-net place. -- **Approval, instruction, receipt, schedule, threshold, or event language** may identify what admits or enables work rather than an ordinary step. - -### Recurring operational shapes - -#### Timed work - -A step occupies elapsed time or timing affects the objective. This may require distinguishing an activity from its in-progress interval. - -#### Conditional or probabilistic outcome - -The same activity can produce different outcomes. This may require a deciding condition, observed likelihood, or explicit unknown. - -#### Contended resource - -Several activities want the same limited capability. This may be a reusable resource that becomes unavailable while held rather than an input that is consumed. - -#### Consumed, reserved, or read input - -An activity uses something by transforming it, holding it temporarily, or observing it without making it unavailable. The same thing may play different roles in different activities. - -#### Batch, lot, load, or grouped movement - -Work moves or is processed as a group whose formation, cohesion, split, or release may affect behavior. - -#### Gate, release, trigger, or prerequisite - -An observable event or condition enables work. It may originate outside the process or be produced by an earlier activity. - -#### Mode change - -Setup, changeover, restart, warm-up, handover, reconfiguration, or cleaning changes what can happen next and may have direction-dependent loss. - -#### Event rather than step - -A failure, interruption, deadline expiry, or unplanned arrival befalls the operation rather than advancing its normal flow. - -#### Threshold on a changing quantity - -A level, temperature, charge, wear state, count, or other evolving quantity crosses a boundary that changes process behavior. - -#### Policy under pressure - -More than one action is possible or more than one claimant wants the same capability. The practiced selection rule may differ from the posted rule. - -#### Hidden waiting - -A gap between activities may reflect an unavailable input, resource, calendar, release rule, batch, transport, approval, or recovery condition rather than an independently elicited queue. - -#### Failure, retry, and recovery - -A case can fail to complete, repeat part or all of its work, enter an unhappy path, degrade, or recover. - -## Operations - -Use the universal Operations as the interviewing methods. These moves bind them to operational-process and SDCPN concerns. - -### Choose the case unit - -When several things flow, ask which unit makes one concrete case intelligible—an order, item, batch, patient, vehicle, request, or another term the person supplies. Use that unit for the first slice. - -### Expose the process spine - -Follow the chosen case from admission to outcome. Ask what happens next, what each activity needs and changes, how branches are decided, where waiting occurs, and what ends or hands off the case. - -### Link the slice to the simulation objective - -As the case unfolds, ask which activities, decisions, resources, conditions, and outcomes the stated simulation question depends on. Return to the case when the objective still has no operational support. - -### Sweep one operational relation - -After the slice, choose one objective-relevant relation and examine it across the things already discovered. Useful process sweeps include duration, input-use mode, availability, type-dependent variation, practiced policy, failure/recovery, and boundary behavior. - -### Classify activity inputs - -For each load-bearing activity/input relation, ask whether the input is transformed, made unavailable and later released, or observed while remaining available. For a reserved input, follow when and in what state it returns. - -### Trace disruption and recovery - -For a disruption the person recognizes, follow what happens to the work in hand, the whole case, occupied resources, retry, recovery, and terminal outcome. - -### Test contention with a borderline case - -When demand can exceed a resource's availability, ask about a recent contested or exceptional case to expose the practiced priority, tie-break, override, acquisition, and release behavior. - -### Follow waiting to its enabling condition - -Ask what the case is waiting for and which observable event makes it able to continue. Locate the surrounding prerequisite, resource, policy, calendar, batch, transport, or recovery condition. - -### Compare both directions of a mode change - -Ask whether A-to-B differs from B-to-A and whether the loss propagates beyond the local activity. Pursue time, material, capacity, and sequencing consequences only where the operation distinguishes them. - -### Surface conservation - -When quantities enter and leave a process, ask what total should remain constant, where loss is possible, and which units the operation uses. - -### Anchor validation in an observable comparison - -Ask what observation, replay, historical comparison, or expert judgment would make the simulation model credible for its intended question. Do not substitute the person's prediction of the answer for validation of the modeled process. - -## Coverage - -Coverage identifies what the workpiece may need for the stated simulation use and later SDCPN construction. It is not a questionnaire, closed ontology, or demand to populate irrelevant sections. - -### Purpose, goals, measures, constraints, and thresholds - -Preserve what the model must answer or compare, what may be varied, what should improve or be avoided, what “better” means, and any trade-off, safety condition, or threshold the person can judge. Record which operational material each objective depends on. Qualitative goals remain qualitative when no supported metric or weight exists. - -### Process boundary, triggers, prerequisites, and initial conditions - -Preserve what is inside and outside; what enters or leaves; what starts or admits a case; calendars and availability; approvals or instructions; external events; initial populations; and reliability of boundary inputs. - -### Participants, locations, flowing things, and resources - -Preserve who or what flows, performs, decides, supplies, occupies, or constrains the process; distinctions the operation treats differently; consequential carried state; counts and population shape; qualifications and compatibility; and the operational effect of location. A resource is a role combining a usable thing with availability, capacity, and contention behavior, not necessarily a separate target kind. - -### Activities, inputs, outputs, and resource use - -For each consequential activity, preserve its operational name, preconditions, performer, inputs, consumed/reserved/read use, outputs and state changes, duration, success and failure outcomes, occurrence when it is an event, mode-change loss, and variation by type or context. - -### Flow, branching, joining, failure, retry, and recovery - -Preserve activity order, branch and join conditions, interruptions, unhappy paths, retry and recovery behavior, effects on work and occupied resources, and terminal outcomes. Activities without stated order do not yet form a process spine. - -### Time, quantities, arrivals, and stochastic behavior - -Preserve durations, rates, counts, capacities, probabilities, arrival and availability patterns, relevant typical and tail behavior, dependence on type/load/calendar/state, continuous quantities, direction and rate of change, variation, thresholds, and resets. Keep each value at the context and precision its source supports. - -### Policies, exceptions, practiced rules, and contextual regimes - -Preserve the rule used when more than one thing could happen, contention priorities, tie-breaking, release conditions, overrides, prescribed and practiced accounts, and the context selecting each account. Keep correction, unresolved conflict, and contextual coexistence distinguishable. - -### Validation, evidence sources, and data bindings - -Preserve the observation or comparison that would make the model credible, variables a real source might drive, units and update context, who or what is authoritative for missing values, and evidence that is not currently available. Unsupported live bindings and qualitative validation remain workpiece knowledge rather than implied implementation. - -### Cross-cutting simulation qualifiers - -Across the concerns above, preserve only the target-relevant qualifiers not already supplied by the universal reference: entity or activity type, direction, operating regime, calendar, load, resource state, and the context and supported precision of simulation quantities. - -### Concepts that do not imply independent target nodes - -- Waiting is explained by surrounding activities and enabling conditions and may later produce target structure. -- A scenario is assembled from boundary conditions, initial state, parameters, and candidate policies. -- A resource combines a usable thing with capacity, availability, and contention behavior. -- A physical location becomes target-relevant only through an operational effect. - -## Verification - -These checks assess the elicited operational account and its readiness for SDCPN construction. Universal Verification continues to own authorship, uncertainty, interaction load, generic divergence, and honest stopping. - -### Purpose and spine - -- At least one simulation question, decision, or comparison is stated in the person's terms. -- The account identifies a meaningful process boundary and concrete case. -- The case has an admission or trigger, ordered activities, branch conditions where present, and an outcome or handoff. -- Every claimed objective depends on recorded process material or is visibly unsupported. - -### Resources and activity semantics - -- Each load-bearing input is classified as consumed, reserved/released, or read. -- Each objective-relevant contended resource has acquisition, unavailability while held, release, and an honest count or unknown. -- Waiting is associated with an evidenced enabling condition rather than treated as a self-explanatory queue. -- Direction-dependent mode changes retain their distinct losses. - -### Time and contextual variation - -- Each consequential duration, rate, probability, count, or threshold retains its applicable context and supported precision. -- A point value represents evidenced constancy or a named purpose-relative simplification, not missing variation. -- Prescribed/practiced regimes and other contextual variants remain distinct where they change behavior. - -### Construction readiness - -- The workpiece states what flows, what happens, in what order, what enables it, and what reusable resources it occupies. -- Target-relevant gaps and material known to be unrepresentable are visible. -- Construction can use the workpiece without recovering a load-bearing operational fact from transcript memory. - -### Target-specific failure signals and repairs - -- **Unsupported simulation objective:** no process material bears on the question. Return to a concrete case that can expose the dependency. -- **Dead process spine:** activities exist without order, admission, or outcome. Continue the slice at the missing connection. -- **Resource disappearance:** a reusable capability is acquired without release or an explicit terminal loss. Re-enter the activity/input relation. -- **Posted policy compiled as practice:** a document supplies the operative rule without an observed case. Test a contested or exceptional case. -- **Unsupported stochastic precision:** an average or invented distribution replaces consequential variation. Restore the source-supported value and context. -- **Pattern-generated process fact:** a recurring shape supplied structure the person did not establish. Remove the claim or ask whether the shape applies. -- **Formalism-shaped interview:** questions are framed as places, transitions, or arcs. Translate the active gap back into operational events, conditions, things, and consequences. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts.example b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts.example deleted file mode 100644 index 9f4569407fb..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/_drafts/five-register-synthesis/plugin-sdcpn/sdcpn-modelling/skill.ts.example +++ /dev/null @@ -1,24 +0,0 @@ -import { defineSkill } from "@flue/runtime"; - -import { universalElicitationReference } from "@hashintel/brunch-agent/flue"; - -import checks from "./checks.md?raw"; -import instructions from "./instructions.md?raw"; -import pnConstruction from "./pn-construction.md?raw"; -import profile from "./profile.md?raw"; -import workpieceTemplate from "./workpiece-template.md?raw"; - -/** One packaged skill composed explicitly from separately authored resources. */ -export const sdcpnModellingSkill = defineSkill({ - name: "sdcpn-modelling", - description: - "Elicit or revise an operational process model, maintain its recoverable workpiece, and construct an inspected SDCPN with an explicit evidence level when Petrinaut capabilities are available.", - instructions, - files: { - "references/checks.md": checks, - "references/pn-construction.md": pnConstruction, - "references/profile.md": profile, - "references/universal-elicitation.md": universalElicitationReference, - "templates/workpiece.md": workpieceTemplate, - }, -}); diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md index 6c8049566df..779d93840c8 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/SYSTEM.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Establish what the result must help the person decide, answer, compare, explain, ## Interaction -Use the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Do not open with a battery of independent questions; deepen one answerable thread at a time and group questions only when they share one frame. +Use the person's vocabulary and follow concrete cases rather than traversing a schema, template, or target representation. Whenever human knowledge is required, ask exactly one focused question per turn. Do not bundle subquestions, even when they share one frame; re-evaluate the next gap after the answer. ## Authorship and uncertainty diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/universal-elicitation.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/universal-elicitation.md index 449d3f7066e..32ece2e06ee 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/universal-elicitation.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/universal-elicitation.md @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ Use the person's vocabulary. Prefer concrete remembered cases to an abstract tou ### Protect interaction bandwidth -Do not open with a battery of independent questions. Ask one coherent, answerable opening question. Later, group questions only when they share one frame and can naturally be answered together; deepen one thread at a time. +Ask exactly one focused question per turn whenever human knowledge is required. Do not bundle subquestions, even when they share one frame; deepen one thread and re-evaluate the next gap after the answer. ### Preserve authorship and uncertainty @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ Verification applies near the action it checks. Repair locally where possible; r - The question serves the stated purpose or resolves an active uncertainty. - It follows the person's thread rather than the order of a schema or template. -- It asks one focused thing, or a small set that genuinely shares one frame. +- It asks one focused thing and does not bundle subquestions. - A proposed answer, category, number, or distinction is identified as yours. ### Before recording diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/baseline-runner.test.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/baseline-runner.test.ts deleted file mode 100644 index 75e6391bb13..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/test/architecture/baseline-runner.test.ts +++ /dev/null @@ -1,386 +0,0 @@ -import { spawn } from "node:child_process"; -import { existsSync } from "node:fs"; -import { - cp, - mkdir, - mkdtemp, - readFile, - readdir, - rm, - symlink, - writeFile, -} from "node:fs/promises"; -import { createServer } from "node:http"; -import { tmpdir } from "node:os"; -import { join } from "node:path"; -import { pathToFileURL } from "node:url"; - -import * as v from "valibot"; -import { afterEach, describe, expect, test } from "vitest"; - -import { CONTEXT_ROOT, contextRootPresent } from "./context-root"; - -import type { StubReply } from "./fixtures/baseline-anthropic-stub"; - -const BASELINE_PROTOCOL_DIR = join( - CONTEXT_ROOT, - "evaluations/protocols/legacy-baseline", -); -const BASELINE_CASE_DIR = join( - CONTEXT_ROOT, - "evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling", -); -const STUB_MODULE = pathToFileURL( - join(import.meta.dirname, "fixtures/baseline-anthropic-stub.ts"), -).href; -const temporaryDirectories: string[] = []; - -interface BaselineCopy { - outputDirectory: string; - protocolDirectory: string; - testDirectory: string; -} - -const BaselineCheckpoint = v.object({ - condition: v.picklist(["1", "2", "4"]), - stopReason: v.string(), - calls: v.array(v.unknown()), - interviewerMessages: v.array( - v.object({ - role: v.picklist(["user", "assistant"]), - content: v.string(), - truncated: v.optional(v.boolean()), - }), - ), -}); - -const BaselineRequest = v.object({ - model: v.string(), - system: v.optional(v.string()), - messages: v.array(v.record(v.string(), v.unknown())), -}); - -async function copyDirectoryContents( - sourceDirectory: string, - destinationDirectory: string, -): Promise { - await Promise.all( - (await readdir(sourceDirectory)).map((entry) => - cp(join(sourceDirectory, entry), join(destinationDirectory, entry), { - recursive: true, - }), - ), - ); -} - -// The runner resolves the case directory and its prompt files relative to its -// own location, so the copy mirrors the protocol and case paths under one root. -async function createBaselineCopy(): Promise { - const testDirectory = await mkdtemp(join(tmpdir(), "baseline-runner-test-")); - temporaryDirectories.push(testDirectory); - const protocolDirectory = join( - testDirectory, - "evaluations/protocols/legacy-baseline", - ); - const caseDirectory = join( - testDirectory, - "evaluations/cases/vestera-scheduling", - ); - await Promise.all([ - mkdir(protocolDirectory, { recursive: true }), - mkdir(caseDirectory, { recursive: true }), - ]); - await Promise.all([ - copyDirectoryContents(BASELINE_PROTOCOL_DIR, protocolDirectory), - copyDirectoryContents(BASELINE_CASE_DIR, caseDirectory), - ]); - await symlink( - join(CONTEXT_ROOT, "../../../node_modules"), - join(testDirectory, "node_modules"), - ); - return { - outputDirectory: join(testDirectory, "test-output"), - protocolDirectory, - testDirectory, - }; -} - -async function runBaseline( - baselineCopy: BaselineCopy, - replies: StubReply[], - condition: "1" | "2" | "4" = "1", - mode?: "--resume" | "--continue-final", -): Promise<{ - checkpoint: v.InferOutput; - stderr: string; - requests: Array>; -}> { - const requestsPath = join(baselineCopy.testDirectory, "requests.jsonl"); - const repliesPath = join(baselineCopy.testDirectory, "replies.json"); - await writeFile(repliesPath, JSON.stringify(replies)); - const subprocess = spawn( - process.execPath, - [ - "--experimental-strip-types", - join(baselineCopy.protocolDirectory, "run.ts"), - condition, - ...(mode ? [mode] : []), - ], - { - cwd: baselineCopy.testDirectory, - env: { - ...process.env, - BRUNCH_BASELINE_ANTHROPIC_MODULE: STUB_MODULE, - BRUNCH_BASELINE_TEST_OUTPUT_DIR: baselineCopy.outputDirectory, - BASELINE_STUB_REPLIES_PATH: repliesPath, - BASELINE_STUB_REQUESTS_PATH: requestsPath, - }, - stdio: ["ignore", "ignore", "pipe"], - }, - ); - subprocess.stderr.setEncoding("utf8"); - let stderr = ""; - subprocess.stderr.on("data", (chunk: string) => { - stderr += chunk; - }); - const exitCode = await new Promise((resolve, reject) => { - subprocess.once("error", reject); - subprocess.once("close", resolve); - }); - expect(exitCode, stderr).toBe(0); - - const checkpoint = v.parse( - BaselineCheckpoint, - JSON.parse( - await readFile( - join(baselineCopy.outputDirectory, `condition-${condition}.raw.json`), - "utf8", - ), - ) as unknown, - ); - const requests = (await readFile(requestsPath, "utf8")) - .trim() - .split("\n") - .map((line) => v.parse(BaselineRequest, JSON.parse(line) as unknown)); - return { checkpoint, stderr, requests }; -} - -afterEach(async () => { - await Promise.all( - temporaryDirectories - .splice(0) - .map((directory) => rm(directory, { recursive: true, force: true })), - ); -}); - -describe.skipIf(!contextRootPresent)("baseline runner", () => { - test("rejects an output override without the stub module before API calls or output", async () => { - const baselineCopy = await createBaselineCopy(); - let apiCalls = 0; - const server = createServer((_request, response) => { - apiCalls += 1; - response.writeHead(500).end(); - }); - await new Promise((resolve) => { - server.listen(0, "127.0.0.1", resolve); - }); - const address = server.address(); - if (!address || typeof address === "string") { - throw new Error("Expected the test API server to listen on a TCP port"); - } - - const { BRUNCH_BASELINE_ANTHROPIC_MODULE: _stubModule, ...env } = - process.env; - const subprocess = spawn( - process.execPath, - [ - "--experimental-strip-types", - join(baselineCopy.protocolDirectory, "run.ts"), - "1", - ], - { - cwd: baselineCopy.testDirectory, - env: { - ...env, - ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL: `http://127.0.0.1:${address.port}`, - BRUNCH_BASELINE_TEST_OUTPUT_DIR: baselineCopy.outputDirectory, - }, - stdio: ["ignore", "ignore", "pipe"], - }, - ); - subprocess.stderr.setEncoding("utf8"); - let stderr = ""; - subprocess.stderr.on("data", (chunk: string) => { - stderr += chunk; - }); - const exitCode = await new Promise((resolve, reject) => { - subprocess.once("error", reject); - subprocess.once("close", resolve); - }); - await new Promise((resolve, reject) => { - server.close((error) => (error ? reject(error) : resolve())); - }); - - expect(exitCode).toBe(1); - expect(stderr).toContain( - "BRUNCH_BASELINE_TEST_OUTPUT_DIR requires BRUNCH_BASELINE_ANTHROPIC_MODULE", - ); - expect(apiCalls).toBe(0); - expect(existsSync(baselineCopy.outputDirectory)).toBe(false); - }); - - test("refuses the retired condition 3 entry point", async () => { - const baselineCopy = await createBaselineCopy(); - const subprocess = spawn( - process.execPath, - [ - "--experimental-strip-types", - join(baselineCopy.protocolDirectory, "run.ts"), - "3", - ], - { - cwd: baselineCopy.testDirectory, - env: { - ...process.env, - BRUNCH_BASELINE_ANTHROPIC_MODULE: STUB_MODULE, - BRUNCH_BASELINE_TEST_OUTPUT_DIR: baselineCopy.outputDirectory, - }, - stdio: ["ignore", "ignore", "pipe"], - }, - ); - subprocess.stderr.setEncoding("utf8"); - let stderr = ""; - subprocess.stderr.on("data", (chunk: string) => { - stderr += chunk; - }); - const exitCode = await new Promise((resolve, reject) => { - subprocess.once("error", reject); - subprocess.once("close", resolve); - }); - - expect(exitCode).toBe(1); - expect(stderr).toContain("usage: node run.ts <1|2|4>"); - expect(existsSync(baselineCopy.outputDirectory)).toBe(false); - }); - - test("checkpoints a truncated expert reply and stops before another interviewer call", async () => { - const testDirectory = await createBaselineCopy(); - const result = await runBaseline(testDirectory, [ - { text: "What happens next?" }, - { text: "NO" }, - { text: "The operator begins to explain", truncated: true }, - ]); - - expect(result.checkpoint.calls).toHaveLength(3); - expect(result.checkpoint.stopReason).toBe("expert-truncated"); - expect(result.checkpoint.interviewerMessages.at(-1)).toEqual({ - role: "user", - content: "The operator begins to explain", - truncated: true, - }); - expect(result.stderr).toContain("expert reply is truncated"); - }); - - test("preserves the condition 2 prompt and completion path", async () => { - const testDirectory = await createBaselineCopy(); - const result = await runBaseline( - testDirectory, - [{ text: "Final structured model" }, { text: "YES" }], - "2", - ); - - expect(result.checkpoint.stopReason).toBe("delivered"); - expect(result.requests[0]?.system).toContain( - "You are an expert process-model elicitor", - ); - }); - - test("resume regenerates a trailing truncated expert reply before continuing", async () => { - const testDirectory = await createBaselineCopy(); - await runBaseline(testDirectory, [ - { text: "What happens next?" }, - { text: "NO" }, - { text: "Partial expert reply", truncated: true }, - ]); - - const resumed = await runBaseline( - testDirectory, - [ - { text: "Complete expert reply" }, - { text: "Final model" }, - { text: "YES" }, - ], - "1", - "--resume", - ); - - expect(resumed.checkpoint.stopReason).toBe("delivered"); - expect(resumed.checkpoint.interviewerMessages).toEqual([ - expect.objectContaining({ role: "user" }), - { role: "assistant", content: "What happens next?" }, - { role: "user", content: "Complete expert reply" }, - { role: "assistant", content: "Final model" }, - ]); - expect(resumed.stderr).toContain("regenerating truncated expert reply"); - }); - - test("checkpoints a capped non-final interviewer reply and stops before calling the expert", async () => { - const testDirectory = await createBaselineCopy(); - const result = await runBaseline(testDirectory, [ - { text: "part-1", truncated: true }, - { text: "part-2", truncated: true }, - { text: "part-3", truncated: true }, - { text: "part-4", truncated: true }, - { text: "part-5", truncated: true }, - { text: "NO" }, - ]); - - expect(result.checkpoint.calls).toHaveLength(6); - expect(result.checkpoint.stopReason).toBe("interviewer-truncated"); - expect(result.checkpoint.interviewerMessages.at(-1)).toEqual({ - role: "assistant", - content: "part-1part-2part-3part-4part-5", - truncated: true, - }); - expect(result.stderr).toContain("non-final interviewer reply is truncated"); - }); - - test("continues a truncated final delivery without sending checkpoint metadata", async () => { - const testDirectory = await createBaselineCopy(); - await runBaseline(testDirectory, [ - { text: "part-1", truncated: true }, - { text: "part-2", truncated: true }, - { text: "part-3", truncated: true }, - { text: "part-4", truncated: true }, - { text: "part-5", truncated: true }, - { text: "YES" }, - ]); - await rm(join(testDirectory.testDirectory, "requests.jsonl")); - - const continued = await runBaseline( - testDirectory, - [{ text: " continued" }], - "1", - "--continue-final", - ); - - expect(continued.requests).toHaveLength(1); - expect(continued.requests[0]?.messages).toEqual([ - expect.objectContaining({ role: "user" }), - { role: "assistant", content: "part-1part-2part-3part-4part-5" }, - { - role: "user", - content: - "You were cut off mid-document. Continue exactly from where you stopped — no preamble, no repetition.", - }, - ]); - for (const message of continued.requests[0]?.messages ?? []) { - expect(Object.keys(message).sort()).toEqual(["content", "role"]); - } - expect(continued.checkpoint.stopReason).toBe("delivered"); - expect(continued.checkpoint.interviewerMessages.at(-1)).toEqual({ - role: "assistant", - content: "part-1part-2part-3part-4part-5 continued", - }); - }); -}); diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md index ed5f2e90cf0..62d6a15c950 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/APPEND_SYSTEM.md @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Specialize the universal elicitation role to operational processes represented as stochastic dynamic coloured Petri nets (SDCPNs) in Petrinaut. Help a person develop or revise an evidence-faithful process-model workpiece and, when the available evidence and tools support it, construct and check a net from that workpiece. -Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction. +Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill before substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction. Do not ask an interactive question or create or revise a workpiece until the activated skill's required branch resources have returned successfully. During interactive elicitation, speak about the operation in the person's vocabulary rather than places, transitions, arcs, colours, tokens, firing rules, or workpiece headings. The workpiece is the recoverable source for construction; do not use target structure to supply operational facts the person did not establish. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md index eeddd1895a0..5554ccf8097 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/src/skills/sdcpn-modelling/instructions.md @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ answer a resolvable review question, or frame the first elicitation question. Construct only when the mounted capabilities actually permit construction in this conversation. +Before asking any interactive question, verify that every resource required by the selected branch has already returned successfully. Before emitting a new or materially revised `runbook-ir`, also verify that the workpiece template has returned successfully. If either gate is incomplete, read the missing resource first; never continue from memory or a failed read. + ### Construct-only execution Use the supplied workpiece as the complete modelling input. Do not interview. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/test/sdcpn-modelling-skill.test.ts b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/test/sdcpn-modelling-skill.test.ts index dfe08356f6b..1dc2c0f3920 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/test/sdcpn-modelling-skill.test.ts +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-sdcpn/test/sdcpn-modelling-skill.test.ts @@ -33,6 +33,9 @@ describe("the authored sdcpn-modelling skill", () => { const construction = readSkillFile("pn-construction.md"); const checks = readSkillFile("checks.md"); expect(instructions).toMatch(/ask exactly one focused question/u); + expect(instructions).toContain( + "Before asking any interactive question, verify that every resource required by the selected branch has already returned successfully", + ); expect(instructions).toMatch( /Read `templates\/workpiece\.md` only when first creating or materially revising\s+the workpiece/u, ); @@ -64,5 +67,8 @@ describe("the authored sdcpn-modelling skill", () => { "substantive elicitation, review, workpiece revision, or construction", ); expect(append).toContain("Activate the `sdcpn-modelling` skill"); + expect(append).toContain( + "Do not ask an interactive question or create or revise a workpiece until the activated skill's required branch resources have returned successfully", + ); }); }); diff --git a/yarn.lock b/yarn.lock index 4ee22a5a7b0..c7f6e426f62 100644 --- a/yarn.lock +++ b/yarn.lock @@ -434,6 +434,7 @@ __metadata: version: 0.0.0-use.local resolution: "@apps/brunch-agent@workspace:apps/brunch-agent" dependencies: + "@anthropic-ai/sdk": "npm:0.74.0" "@earendil-works/pi-ai": "npm:0.83.0" "@flue/opentelemetry": "npm:2.0.3" "@flue/react": "npm:2.0.3" From ed61aeb033ef7ce9d42de34a426cf69798a1c20f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 15:35:49 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 044/101] Freeze the repaired Mission 4 campaign protocol --- libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md | 2 +- .../evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/protocol.md | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md index 9c5f47a1d53..8993367648e 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Live. Reopened on 2026-09-02 after review found that the attempted close did not satisfy this contract. This file is again the sole execution authority for [FE-1563](https://linear.app/hash/issue/FE-1563/redesign-the-elicitation-runbook-and-workpiece-against-the-frozen). Mission 5 remains uncut and unimplemented. -The production architecture is retained, but the first v3 paid campaign, repaired browser witness, adjudication, Mission 5 handoff, and close record do not satisfy proof items 3, 7, 8, 9, or 10. They remain historical failure evidence only. The [owner-gate clarification](docs/evidence/decisions/mission-4-owner-gates-2026-09-02.md) confirms that the prior budget, campaign, witness-repair, witness-acceptance, and closure authorizations occurred, but withdraws the resulting acceptance and requires the reserved owner gates to be restored. No new paid call, freeze, adjudication, witness acceptance, handoff selection, or closure is authorized by this reopening. +The production architecture is retained, but the first v3 paid campaign, repaired browser witness, adjudication, Mission 5 handoff, and close record do not satisfy proof items 3, 7, 8, 9, or 10. They remain historical failure evidence only. The [owner-gate clarification](docs/evidence/decisions/mission-4-owner-gates-2026-09-02.md) confirms that the prior budget, campaign, witness-repair, witness-acceptance, and closure authorizations occurred, but withdraws the resulting acceptance and requires the reserved owner gates to be restored. The parent subsequently froze the repaired v4 protocol after its hermetic integrity suite passed. No paid call, adjudication, witness acceptance, handoff selection, or closure is authorized by this reopening. Mission 3's prospective campaign remains the immutable control: one invalid runtime member and two valid independently graded workpieces, with the adjudicated range in [`docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md`](docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md). Its observed artifacts and source revision `b738aa1be1a62a9f9cdde89ced78558f04293a77` remain the exact v1 instrument of record. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/protocol.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/protocol.md index 5d13a7625c9..246caaf4a78 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/protocol.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/protocol.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # Mission 4 repaired architecture scoring v4 -Status: **draft repair protocol; no paid execution authorized** +Status: **parent-frozen repair protocol; no paid execution authorized** Protocol id: `prospective-runbook-v4` From df5384bea8d091b39b7a08add04e86d6663ca899 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 15:38:25 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 045/101] Authorize the repaired Mission 4 scoring campaign --- libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md | 2 +- .../evidence/decisions/mission-4-owner-gates-2026-09-02.md | 2 +- .../evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/protocol.md | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md index 8993367648e..6a7104e5c7d 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/MISSION.md @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Live. Reopened on 2026-09-02 after review found that the attempted close did not satisfy this contract. This file is again the sole execution authority for [FE-1563](https://linear.app/hash/issue/FE-1563/redesign-the-elicitation-runbook-and-workpiece-against-the-frozen). Mission 5 remains uncut and unimplemented. -The production architecture is retained, but the first v3 paid campaign, repaired browser witness, adjudication, Mission 5 handoff, and close record do not satisfy proof items 3, 7, 8, 9, or 10. They remain historical failure evidence only. The [owner-gate clarification](docs/evidence/decisions/mission-4-owner-gates-2026-09-02.md) confirms that the prior budget, campaign, witness-repair, witness-acceptance, and closure authorizations occurred, but withdraws the resulting acceptance and requires the reserved owner gates to be restored. The parent subsequently froze the repaired v4 protocol after its hermetic integrity suite passed. No paid call, adjudication, witness acceptance, handoff selection, or closure is authorized by this reopening. +The production architecture is retained, but the first v3 paid campaign, repaired browser witness, adjudication, Mission 5 handoff, and close record do not satisfy proof items 3, 7, 8, 9, or 10. They remain historical failure evidence only. The [owner-gate clarification](docs/evidence/decisions/mission-4-owner-gates-2026-09-02.md) confirms that the prior budget, campaign, witness-repair, witness-acceptance, and closure authorizations occurred, but withdraws the resulting acceptance and requires the reserved owner gates to be restored. The parent subsequently froze the repaired v4 protocol after its hermetic integrity suite passed. The owner authorized its three candidate replications and complete omniscient/cold grading under a combined US$10 ceiling after fold and clean hermetic proof; the later visible witness remains separately gated. No campaign adjudication, witness acceptance, handoff selection, or closure is authorized by this reopening. Mission 3's prospective campaign remains the immutable control: one invalid runtime member and two valid independently graded workpieces, with the adjudicated range in [`docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md`](docs/evidence/evaluations/vestera-prospective-baseline-v1/campaign-adjudication.md). Its observed artifacts and source revision `b738aa1be1a62a9f9cdde89ced78558f04293a77` remain the exact v1 instrument of record. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/decisions/mission-4-owner-gates-2026-09-02.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/decisions/mission-4-owner-gates-2026-09-02.md index 727fc2b63d3..5fd69bcc911 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/decisions/mission-4-owner-gates-2026-09-02.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/evidence/decisions/mission-4-owner-gates-2026-09-02.md @@ -10,4 +10,4 @@ This confirmation applies to the prior US$10 paid ceiling, campaign acceptance, The owner also directed that the builder's exercise and declaration of parent-reserved freeze, adjudication, witness acceptance, handoff selection, and closure “must be undone,” and that every spec failure identified by review “should be restored/repaired/re-done.” The previous acceptance and closure are therefore withdrawn. Mission 4 is live again. -This record authorizes no new paid call, cost ceiling, freeze, campaign acceptance, witness acceptance, handoff selection, or closure. Those gates remain with the parent and owner under `MISSION.md`. +The owner subsequently authorized the parent to run the frozen three-member v4 candidate campaign and complete omniscient/cold grading for each valid member under a combined US$10 ceiling, after the instrument is folded onto FE-1563 and its clean hermetic suite passes there. This authorization excludes the later visible product witness. It does not authorize campaign acceptance, witness acceptance, handoff selection, or closure; those gates remain with the parent and owner under `MISSION.md`. diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/protocol.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/protocol.md index 246caaf4a78..38e7a23c3e2 100644 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/protocol.md +++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/evaluations/protocols/prospective-runbook-v4/protocol.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # Mission 4 repaired architecture scoring v4 -Status: **parent-frozen repair protocol; no paid execution authorized** +Status: **parent-frozen repair protocol; candidate and grader calls authorized under a combined US$10 ceiling after fold and clean hermetic proof** Protocol id: `prospective-runbook-v4` @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ This mirrors the flat-prompt control's three-invocation shape and seeks a two-wo ## Preconditions and freeze -No paid budget is authorized. The parent must freeze the final clean instrument and obtain explicit owner authorization for a new call and cost ceiling before candidate or grader execution. Before creating a replication, the runner applies every free path, configuration, clean-instrument, fingerprint, and namespace guard, then makes a one-token credential/model-availability preflight outside campaign membership. A failed preflight creates no member. Successful preflight cost still counts against the owner ceiling. +The owner authorized a combined US$10 ceiling for three candidate replications and complete omniscient/cold grading of each valid member, conditional on first folding the instrument onto FE-1563 and passing its clean hermetic suite there. The later visible witness is excluded and remains separately gated. Before creating a replication, the runner applies every free path, configuration, clean-instrument, fingerprint, and namespace guard, then makes a one-token credential/model-availability preflight outside campaign membership. A failed preflight creates no member. Successful preflight cost still counts against the owner ceiling. The runner hashes the complete candidate source and lock scope, complete built-server `dist/*.mjs` manifest, comparison-target artifacts, case, ledger, ruler, grader prompts, and this protocol. The first member fixes the fingerprint. Later members must match it exactly. From 04781b66a998d5b07196baf96e99cd61adfd6491 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lu Nelson Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 15:40:02 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 046/101] manual docs move Signed-off-by: Lu Nelson --- ...iting-and-constructing-processes-to-PNs.md | 0 .../docs/{inbox => archive}/jetty-runbooks.md | 0 .../jetty-writing-runbooks.md | 0 .../pplx-agent-skill-rule-loading.md | 0 .../pplx-single-global-agents-file.md | 0 .../amp-session-reviewing-architecture.md | 6996 ----------------- .../amp-session-reviewing-architecture.md | 610 ++ .../salvage/design-questions-re-provenance.md | 462 ++ .../more-plugin-inputs}/claude-dafny-lean.md | 0 ...g-design-rationale-2026-04-18T12-57-01Z.md | 0 ...gases-1-pn-consumption-trigger-layout.json | 0 .../gases-1-pn-layout.json | 0 .../gases-2-spn-layout.json | 0 .../gases-3-cpn-layout.json | 0 .../gases-4-dcpn-layout.json | 0 .../semiconductor-fab-drift-layout.json | 0 ...k-fleet-predictive-maintenance-layout.json | 0 17 files changed, 1072 insertions(+), 6996 deletions(-) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/{inbox => archive}/eliciting-and-constructing-processes-to-PNs.md (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/{inbox => archive}/jetty-runbooks.md (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/{inbox => archive}/jetty-writing-runbooks.md (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/{inbox => archive}/pplx-agent-skill-rule-loading.md (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/{inbox => archive}/pplx-single-global-agents-file.md (100%) delete mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/inbox/amp-session-reviewing-architecture.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/inbox/salvage/amp-session-reviewing-architecture.md create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/inbox/salvage/design-questions-re-provenance.md rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/inbox/{ => salvage/more-plugin-inputs}/claude-dafny-lean.md (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/inbox/{ => salvage/more-plugin-inputs}/kleppmanns-geolog-design-rationale-2026-04-18T12-57-01Z.md (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/inbox/{ => salvage}/sdcpn-examples-to-validate/gases-1-pn-consumption-trigger-layout.json (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/inbox/{ => salvage}/sdcpn-examples-to-validate/gases-1-pn-layout.json (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/inbox/{ => salvage}/sdcpn-examples-to-validate/gases-2-spn-layout.json (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/inbox/{ => salvage}/sdcpn-examples-to-validate/gases-3-cpn-layout.json (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/inbox/{ => salvage}/sdcpn-examples-to-validate/gases-4-dcpn-layout.json (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/inbox/{ => salvage}/sdcpn-examples-to-validate/semiconductor-fab-drift-layout.json (100%) rename libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/inbox/{ => salvage}/sdcpn-examples-to-validate/truck-fleet-predictive-maintenance-layout.json (100%) diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/inbox/eliciting-and-constructing-processes-to-PNs.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/archive/eliciting-and-constructing-processes-to-PNs.md similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/inbox/eliciting-and-constructing-processes-to-PNs.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/archive/eliciting-and-constructing-processes-to-PNs.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/inbox/jetty-runbooks.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/archive/jetty-runbooks.md similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/inbox/jetty-runbooks.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/archive/jetty-runbooks.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/inbox/jetty-writing-runbooks.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/archive/jetty-writing-runbooks.md similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/inbox/jetty-writing-runbooks.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/archive/jetty-writing-runbooks.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/inbox/pplx-agent-skill-rule-loading.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/archive/pplx-agent-skill-rule-loading.md similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/inbox/pplx-agent-skill-rule-loading.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/archive/pplx-agent-skill-rule-loading.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/inbox/pplx-single-global-agents-file.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/archive/pplx-single-global-agents-file.md similarity index 100% rename from libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/inbox/pplx-single-global-agents-file.md rename to libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/archive/pplx-single-global-agents-file.md diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/inbox/amp-session-reviewing-architecture.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/inbox/amp-session-reviewing-architecture.md deleted file mode 100644 index 0de291bc352..00000000000 --- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/inbox/amp-session-reviewing-architecture.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,6996 +0,0 @@ ---- -title: Package architecture review -author: Lu Nelson -threadId: T-01a032f5-37ff-7328-a0d5-f8ee48678dd2 -created: 2026-08-24T08:48:46.591Z -agentMode: high ---- - -# Package architecture review - -## User - -please get oriented in this package, and then I'd like to conduct a high-level design- and planning-review session - -## Assistant - -I’ll first map the package’s declared architecture, posture, active planning artifacts, and recent work. Then I’ll frame the review around the decisions that are actually open rather than giving a generic codebase tour. - -## User - -it's actually multiple packages; I should have referred to it as a "context root" - -## Assistant - -Right — I’ll treat `libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent` as the **Brunch context root**: one authority surface for the glossary, ADRs, protocols, and planning records; four child package workspaces; plus the separately located `apps/brunch-agent` application. That distinction is architecturally important here. - -The initial read suggests the package boundaries are comparatively settled; the more consequential review target is likely the transition from the completed import/integration spine to the still-provisional elicitation semantics and milestone plan. I’m narrowing that now against the coordination ledger and current Linear state. - -## Assistant - -The coordination document’s literal `yarn turbo …` form is stale for this Yarn setup; it fails before invoking Turbo. I’ll use the repository’s installed Turbo binary directly, preserving the same read-only graph task. - -## Assistant - -The live DAG materially diverges from the 21 August coordination snapshot: seven new root-level issues, FE-1476–FE-1482, now describe the September/demo, routing, provenance, re-elicitation, requirements-graph projection, and CPS-plugin direction. Before proposing a review frame, I’m reading those issue contracts and the three established root maps to determine whether this is intentional reframing or planning drift. - -## Assistant - -I’m oriented to the **Brunch context root**: - -```diagram -┌──────────────────────────────────────────────┐ -│ Brunch context root │ -│ glossary · ADRs · protocols · planning │ -└───────────────┬──────────────────────────────┘ - │ - ┌────────────┼─────────────┬──────────────┐ - ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ - core binding-flue transport-aisdk plugin-gherkin - harness substrate UI wire target policy - └────────────┴─────────────┴──────────────┘ - │ - ▼ - apps/brunch-agent - remote server - │ - ▼ - apps/petrinaut-website - user-facing composition -``` - -### Assessment - -- Package boundaries are coherent and mechanically guarded by the [ratified topology](file:///Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/topology.md#L10-L75). -- The durable mechanics exist: ask/reply, settlement and sweep, provenance anchoring, capture storage, Flue binding, and AI SDK transport. -- The product-defining path remains mostly design: the plugin API is intentionally skeletal, and Gherkin is only a one-proposal tracer ([plugin API](file:///Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin.ts#L5-L14), [Gherkin tracer](file:///Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-gherkin/src/index.ts#L43-L54)). -- The live Linear plan has drifted beyond [COORDINATION.md](file:///Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md#L14-L65): FE-1476–FE-1482 are unregistered roots, FE-1477 substantially duplicates FE-1440, and several new tickets overlap earlier plugin/demo work. -- Most importantly, FE-1480 assumes an inferential requirements-graph → SDCPN projection. That conflicts with ADR-0003’s rule that projections are deterministic over register 2 and semantic inference occurs only through contestable captures ([decision](file:///Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/adr/0003-three-register-ir.md#L24-L49)). - -### Recommendation - -Next: an `arc-map` review of the September milestone—but first settle that projection boundary. Afterwards we can reconcile the demo story, dependencies, and duplicate tickets. - -Opening question: - -**Where should the non-deterministic requirements → SDCPN judgment live?** - -1. **Preserve ADR-0003:** the LLM emits explicit, provenance-bearing formalization captures; folding and SDCPN projection remain pure. -2. **Amend ADR-0003:** projection itself may infer, requiring an auditable and reproducible projection-run model. - -My initial recommendation is **1**. Is that still your intended architecture? - -## User - -To your points: - -- yes, there are new tickets, drafted by my PM Dora, which we must adopt and fold-in to our graph -- package boundaries are in place yes; but implementation boundaries and paths are only traced so far, and this needs serious attention -- and yes FE-1480 will require discussion (as will other issues) - -Before we address those things, let me give you the high-level concerns that are on my mind, as other entrypoints: - -- the integration with the petrinaut demo website is only the thinnest of tracer bullets so far; completing the full contract layers here will bloom in to much larger scopes -- we haven't even begun `plugin-cps`, which is the actual thing we need to build a critical demo around, very soon (2 weeks in human time) -- the current design for the elicitor architecture seems sound; but its rigor may be at cross-purposes with establishing an e2e working model as fast as we can -- IMO the current issue topology/graph likely does not inherently express the goals we need to be driving at - -## Assistant - -Those concerns point to one underlying problem: the current plan is organized around **contract completion**, while the urgent objective is a **demo-capable vertical system**. That makes locally sensible work compete with global time-to-proof. - -I think the review should separate what must stay rigorous from what may remain deliberately narrow for two weeks, then rebuild the dependency graph around the demonstrated outcome. - -## Assistant - -Your diagnosis matches mine. The tension is less **rigor versus speed** than **generality versus speed**. - -We should retain rigor at irreversible boundaries—provenance, capture correction, real application wiring, valid SDCPN output—and defer broad genericity: complete plugin SDK, full CPS ontology, every affordance, multi-target validation, and contract freeze. - -I’d reshape the plan around vertical proofs: - -```diagram -Fixture captures ─▶ CPS model ─▶ valid SDCPN - │ -Live correction ─▶ supersession ─▶ changed SDCPN - │ -Net element ─▶ model slot ─▶ capture ─▶ user evidence - │ - real Petrinaut demo website -``` - -Existing capability tickets become constraints and inputs, not the primary execution sequence. FE-1476 should likely own the demo outcome, with FE-1477–FE-1482 folded beneath it and reconciled against FE-1393/1402/1403/1438/1440/1442. - -The first decisive question: - -**Is FE-1476 now the authoritative demo contract, replacing cold-start comprehensive elicitation with the prebuilt-model → provenance → targeted revision story?** - -My recommendation: **yes**. Otherwise we are planning two demos in two weeks. This would remove full cold-start elicitation and comprehensive completion accounting from the critical path unless they are still explicitly required. - -## User - -This essential line of reasoning is correct; but may still be working on too-thin signals. The core concern that exhibits the tension between the priorities of correct/complete vs "works effective e2e" is the actual elicitor architecture, and I think we should work through a fuller evaluation of this, to understand what's really on the critical path and what's not - -## Assistant - -Agreed. We should not infer the critical path from ticket titles or the demo script yet. We need to evaluate the elicitor as a system: trace each runtime responsibility from user turn to durable assertion, model, projection, and UI effect; then distinguish **missing load-bearing behavior** from merely incomplete contract breadth. - -I’ll assess the traced layers for role completeness, contract coverage, and fidelity to the proposed architecture before we resume prioritization. - -## Assistant - -One concrete issue is already emerging: the implemented loop can interview and append provenance-safe captures, but it cannot yet *reason over the target-document it has built*. The binding gives the model generic ask/sweep instructions; the private sweep sees conversation text and a proposal schema, but there is no register-2 model, demand state, projection, or plugin guidance feeding the next turn. - -I’m checking the correction and projection seams now, because the new demo requires the loop to revise existing knowledge—not merely capture new statements. - -### Readiness Map: Elicitor architecture - -**Verdict:** the substrate and capture foundation is strong, but the system is only tracer-complete. The implemented path currently terminates at captures: - -```diagram -Implemented -─────────── -User ─▶ agent ─▶ ask/reply ─▶ settlement ─▶ sweep ─▶ durable captures - │ - └── dead end - -Designed but absent -─────────────────── -captures ─▶ fold ─▶ elicited model ─┬─▶ completion/gaps ─▶ next-question policy - ├─▶ SDCPN projection ─▶ Petrinaut - └─▶ provenance map ─▶ targeted revision -``` - -| Layer | Readiness | Critical-path judgment | -|---|---|---| -| Ask/suspend/transport | Mechanically substantial | Foundation ready; broader affordances are deferrable | -| Sweep/capture/provenance | Mechanically substantial | Foundation ready, but not yet usable for revision | -| Model-aware elicitation loop | Absent | **Critical** | -| Register-2 fold/model | Design only | **Critical**, in a deliberately narrow CPS form | -| CPS plugin | Absent | **Critical** | -| SDCPN projection | Design only and contested | **Critical design decision** | -| Petrinaut document application | Ask-only local tracer | **Critical**, but its correct mechanism is unresolved | -| Existing-document/reviewer session | Domain primitives exist; host collapses document to conversation | **Critical** for FE-1476 | -| Artifact provenance and scoped re-elicitation | Store primitives only | **Critical** for FE-1478/1479 | -| Generic plugin authoring, completion, loss reporting, full catalog | Design only | Mostly deferrable unless selected by the demo story | -| Public durability/security/deployment | Partial | Critical only after the functional loop exists | - -#### Important architectural findings - -1. **The elicitor does not yet consult what it has elicited.** - Sweep extraction receives conversation text and proposal names, not active captures, issues, or a derived model ([binding](file:///Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/binding-flue/src/index.ts#L138-L227)). Consequently, no model state can steer the next question. - -2. **Targeted correction is not reachable.** - The store rigorously supports `supersedes`, but extraction cannot see the active capture IDs it must reference. The current Gherkin schema cannot emit `supersedes` either. - -3. **The planned projection and client-tool paths potentially duplicate semantic authority.** - The plugin design says register 2 projects to a canonical SDCPN. FE-1438 instead has the agent manipulate Petrinaut through browser tools. If both perform modelling judgments, provenance and reproducibility break. We must separate: - - semantic projection: model → SDCPN; - - application: SDCPN/diff → live document; - - optional repair: diagnostics → revised projection. - -4. **The reviewer workflow needs a real target-document boundary.** - The domain model supports multiple sessions against one document, but the current host maps `targetDocumentId` directly from `conversationId` ([current mapping](file:///Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/apps/brunch-agent/src/petrinaut-chat.ts#L31-L45)). FE-1476 requires a reviewer session reopening an existing elicitation. - -5. **The generic plugin architecture may be premature, but its fundamental registers are not.** - We probably need captures → model → projection for provenance and revision. We probably do **not** need the complete declarative meta-schema, generic fold algebra, Gherkin-first SDK, all CPS proposal kinds, and contract freeze before proving one CPS path. - -My resulting hypothesis is: - -> Preserve the three-register architecture, but let the first CPS implementation discover the executable plugin boundary instead of completing the generic plugin framework first. - -The next unresolved design area is therefore the **semantic materialization boundary**: concrete CPS fold, projection ownership, provenance mapping, and how the resulting artifact enters Petrinaut. - -**Routing**: where should we go next? - -1. **Explore module shape (Recommended)** — design two competing executable shapes for that semantic boundary. -2. **Design verification** — first define the minimum end-to-end proof and its oracles. -3. **Back to triage** — continue auditing other architectural layers before choosing a boundary. - -Reply **1–3**, or redirect the review. - -## User - -Those routing options are good; but let's keep discussing for now. - -FWIW, your observations match my intuition and my suspicions. - -I must say, that tracer discpline has been a real double-edged sword: it's been a very common for the agent to take the tracer as the "definition of done" and for the actual implementation to be essentially left not only incomplete but barely started. - -I think your essential prioritization and plan-shape is correct; but we're going to need a new protocol for representing and driving that kind of plan or it's going to evaporate after this session: the `COORDINATION.md` doc is nice, but right now only tracks the issue-graph topology with a bias toward _what is mechanically next_ i.e. unblocked, while not having any way to track an actual strategic execution plan, which should rather be objective-driven, epistemically-tracked and with the issue-graph as a sequencing and trade-off surface - -I want to offer the mental model I have of the elicitor architecture so far, which I had skethed out before starting this thread, and which you can also therefore analyze as both a proposal and and an inventory, and help me determine where I have gaps or weak layers. So far, I think of it in roughly four parts, which belong to two essential layers (there are more layers than these two but these are the two with real architectural design pressure and which are currently hollow) - -1. __harness layer: elicitation agentics__. the prompting and skilling parts, general to all elicitations: - - orientations, motivations, licenses - - interviewing/question-formulation guidance -2. __harness layer: capture mechanics and agentics__. the capture mechanics so far; but lacking further build-out, as you've observed - - evidence sweeping and logging mechanism; with annotations re: supersession, conflicts etc. - - next-question ledger and loop? - - mapping plugin-defined types from utterances: entities (nodes), relations (edges), quantities, conditionalities -3. __plugin layer: typologies, critical points and motifs, ...?__. the things for the capture parts to be aware of - - what entities are we after - - what shapes and relations do they have -4. __plugin: runbook (objectives, trajectories, boundaries)__. this is the least sketched part so far IMO, and so "runbook" is a proposal at this point, about how the rest of the plugin manifest could actually be shaped - - the job - - what 'done' looks like - - how to check - - ... (what else?) - -## Assistant - -Your model is sound. I would make two refinements: - -1. Separate the **elicitation controller** from capture mechanics. -2. Separate the plugin’s static **runbook** from the dynamic **engagement brief** it produces for one target-document. - -```diagram - HARNESS -┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐ -│ Strategy repertoire │ -│ orientations · techniques · licenses │ -└───────────────────┬─────────────────────────┘ - ▼ -┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐ -│ Elicitation controller │ -│ assess situation · choose move · stop/replan│ -└───────▲───────────────────────────┬─────────┘ - │ ▼ -┌───────┴───────────────┐ ask · propose · validate -│ Evidence engine │ -│ sweep · capture · │ -│ supersede · resolve │ -└──────────┬────────────┘ - │ assertions - ▼ - PLUGIN -┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐ -│ Domain contract │ -│ proposals · model · fold · diagnostics · │ -│ projection · provenance │ -└──────────▲──────────────────────────────────┘ - │ model state and gaps -┌──────────┴──────────────────────────────────┐ -│ Job runbook │ -│ objectives · trajectory · checks · stopping │ -└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘ -``` - -### 1. Harness: strategy repertoire - -Your contents fit, with one qualification: - -- **Orientations**: generic role and epistemic posture. -- **Licenses**: re-ask, challenge, propose for correction, expose assumptions. -- **Techniques**: contrastive questions, incident reconstruction, quantile elicitation. -- **Question formulation guidance**: generic forms only. - -The harness should define these capabilities, but not decide when domain-specific questions matter. Prompting and Flue skills are their delivery mechanism—not the architectural concepts themselves. - -**Current weakness:** the generic quiver is named but not designed. More importantly, there is no module composing its strategies into a coherent engagement. - -### 2. Harness: evidence engine - -This should own: - -- conversation archive and evidence classification; -- settlement and sweep execution; -- capture envelope and provenance; -- atomic application; -- issues, conflicts, supersession and retraction; -- invocation of plugin-defined proposal extraction. - -But two items in your list sit elsewhere: - -- **“Next-question ledger and loop” belongs to the controller.** -- **Entities, relations and conditionalities belong to plugin vocabulary.** The harness executes schema-constrained extraction; the plugin defines what can be extracted. Quantities may come from a shared stated-form library, but should not become universal harness ontology. - -A useful decomposition is: - -```diagram -Model demand ─▶ knowledge gap ─▶ candidate move ─▶ chosen move ─▶ concrete ask - derived derived derived session state transcript -``` - -The “ledger” should mostly be derived, not persisted. Persist the selected trajectory or active commitment only when continuity requires it; otherwise stale agendas will compete with the current model. - -**Current weakness:** the evidence engine writes captures but provides no read path back into an elicitation controller. It is an append-capable substrate, not yet a closed loop. - -### 3. Plugin: domain contract - -This is broader than “what entities are we after.” It owns: - -- model node kinds, slots and relations; -- utterance-shaped proposal catalog; -- fold and identity semantics; -- grade and conflict semantics; -- domain validators and diagnostics; -- projection into artifacts; -- artifact-element → model-slot → capture provenance mapping. - -I would place your concepts as follows: - -- **Typologies** → model/proposal schemas. -- **Critical points** → derived diagnostics and question triggers. -- **Motifs** → runbook hypotheses or questioning scaffolds, not model facts unless the user confirms them. - -The existing “two schemas, two tables” design covers much of this, but is probably overcommitted to a generic authoring representation before one real CPS model works. - -### 4. Plugin: runbook - -“Runbook” is a good provisional name because it adds time, direction and judgment to the current `ElicitationPack`, which is otherwise mostly a bag of cards and checks ([current contract](file:///Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/spec.md#L531-L550)). - -A runbook likely needs: - -- **Supported job**: build, review, explain, or revise. -- **Kickoff contract**: objective, intended use, scope, audience, available effort. -- **Trajectory**: orient → skeleton → deepen → cross-examine → validate → hand off. -- **Priority policy**: objective relevance, information gain, dependency, user effort and risk. -- **Demand/completion rules**: what knowledge is required and to what grade. -- **Challenge checks**: contradictions, ungrounded assumptions, missing boundaries, invalid projections. -- **Stopping outcomes**: sufficient, useful-partial, stalled, budget-exhausted, user-stopped. -- **Default/inference policy**: what may be proposed, defaulted, inferred or must be asked. -- **Revision policy**: how to scope targeted re-elicitation and determine affected projections. -- **Output/handoff contract**: artifacts, provenance, visible gaps and validation results. -- **Recovery policy**: re-entry after another session or changed target-document. - -However, “the job” is not wholly static plugin content. The plugin offers a runbook template; kickoff creates an **engagement brief** containing the actual objective, boundaries, appetite and selected trajectory. - -### The largest missing architectural role - -The current design contains pieces of the controller—`demandRunner`, `affordanceCuer`, `firesWhen`, completion—but no interface unifying them. The controller must read: - -```text -engagement brief -+ current model and open issues -+ runbook -+ available generic strategies -+ recent conversation state -``` - -and produce a bounded next move: - -```text -ask | propose | contrast | validate | project | explain | stop -``` - -That is the hollow center between “we captured facts” and “we conducted an effective elicitation.” - -There is a parallel planning insight here: **the issue graph is analogous to the capture store**—durable inventory and dependencies, but not an execution strategy. `COORDINATION.md` is a projection over that inventory. A separate strategic plan must act like the controller/runbook: objective, current model of reality, confidence, current bet, proof spine, issue mapping and replanning triggers. - -The next architectural question I would examine is: - -> Does a plugin have one runbook, or a family of job-specific runbooks sharing one domain contract? - -My recommendation is the latter. For CPS, at least **cold-start construction** and **review-and-revise** have different kickoff, trajectory and stopping conditions. The September demo can then implement one honest `review-and-revise` runbook without pretending the complete CPS elicitor already exists. - -## User - -I agree a plugin could define multiple runbooks, that makes sense. And yes the planning insight echoes the gaps we're seeing in teh implementation. The planning itself needs a kind of "runbook" as well, in effect. The routines we've instituted so far here around the COORDINATION.md doc are just one part of that surface, and that surface should be the central sense-making tool for running the project - -## Assistant - -Exactly. **Unblocked is a property of the work graph, not a reason to perform work.** The missing surface must decide what matters next from objectives, evidence, risk and time. - -```diagram -Code/tests/docs/Linear - │ evidence - ▼ -┌──────────────────────────┐ -│ Strategic execution model│ -│ objective · current truth│ -│ bets · proof spine · risk│ -└────────────┬─────────────┘ - │ selects and scopes - ▼ - Issue graph / work - │ - └──── new evidence ────┘ -``` - -The existing artifacts each retain a narrower authority: - -- **Linear:** issue state and hard dependency truth. -- **COORDINATION.md:** topology, soft edges, seams and registry integrity. -- **SPEC-LEDGER.md:** implementation against settled obligations. -- **ADRs/specs:** durable design truth. -- **New strategic surface:** current objective, execution strategy, priority and confidence. - -### What the central surface should contain - -#### 1. Milestone contract - -- Outcome being pursued. -- Observable proof. -- Deadline and audience. -- Explicitly excluded outcomes. -- Which product claims must be honest versus merely demonstrated narrowly. - -#### 2. Current system model - -Not “tickets completed,” but: - -- what genuinely works end-to-end; -- which layers are tracer-only; -- which responsibilities are absent; -- external facts and constraints; -- assumptions with confidence and supporting evidence. - -#### 3. Current strategic bet - -A concise theory such as: - -> Preserve the three-register architecture, prove one CPS review-and-revise runbook concretely, and allow that implementation to determine the generic plugin interface. - -It should state why this bet beats alternatives and what evidence would reverse it. - -#### 4. Proof spine - -Proof obligations, not issues: - -```text -P1 CPS captures derive a model and valid SDCPN with provenance -P2 A reviewer session opens the existing target-document -P3 One scoped correction supersedes evidence and changes the model -P4 Reprojection changes the live Petrinaut net -P5 A provenance question reaches net → model → capture → utterance -P6 The complete path runs through the deployed demo surface -``` - -Each proof carries: - -- certainty; -- missing knowledge; -- acceptance oracle; -- mapped issues; -- dependencies—functional and epistemic; -- replan trigger. - -#### 5. Strategic frontiers - -“Now / next” chosen from the proof spine, with a reason. An issue being unblocked only makes it *eligible*. - -A frontier entry should answer: - -- Why now? -- What uncertainty or capability does it retire? -- What becomes possible after it? -- What is the smallest honest proof? -- Which adjacent work remains deliberately deferred? - -#### 6. Issue projection - -Map issues onto proofs many-to-many. This is where Dora’s tickets are adopted without allowing their initial decomposition to dictate implementation architecture. - -It should expose: - -- duplicate or overlapping tickets; -- tickets that contribute to no current proof; -- proofs with no owned work; -- scope that should move between tickets; -- trade-offs created by sequencing. - -#### 7. Learning and replanning - -Record only consequential shifts: - -- evidence observed; -- assumption promoted, weakened or falsified; -- confidence change; -- resulting strategy or sequence change. - -### Operating protocol - -1. **Orient:** read the strategic surface, then query live issue state. -2. **Select:** choose the frontier with the highest closure or information gain—not the lowest issue number. -3. **Scope:** define the smallest proof-producing slice. -4. **Execute and verify.** -5. **Reconcile:** update evidence, confidence, proof status and issue topology. -6. **Replan when a named trigger fires.** - -I would not design this protocol abstractly first. The September demo should be its first worked instance. We can construct the real strategic surface around the elicitor architecture, use it through at least one replan, and only then extract a reusable schema or skill. - -## User - -Agreed. I don't know yet what this is called; but it's not a roadmap, and not a blueprint, and not the spec either (we can have multiple specs anyway, at different levels) - -It's the thing that tracks objectives, evidence, risk and time -- but strategically, which is to say it continually evaluates the former against the latter: achieving objectives/obligations _UNDER_ constraints, limitations, pressures, unknowns. It consumes specs as one input and uses issues as a planning surface. - -We can model this protocol as we use it. A combination of document structure (perhaps templated?) and perhaps local agent-skills might be necessary, as we go - -## Assistant - -I think the core concept is **steering**. - -- **Steering model** — the current strategic understanding of objectives, position, constraints, evidence, risks and bets. -- **Steering surface** — the document plus tools through which people and agents inspect and update that model. -- **Steering protocol** — the recurring orient → choose → execute → reconcile → replan loop. - -`STEERING.md` would be a plausible provisional name. Unlike a roadmap, steering is explicitly feedback-driven: it continually adjusts the route against observed conditions. - -### Proposed structure - -```md -## Project steering - -### Mission -Outcome, obligations, proof, audience, deadline. - -### Current position -What is proved, tracer-only, absent, contradicted or unknown. - -### Pressures and constraints -Deadline, capacity, external dependencies, non-negotiable invariants. - -### Current strategy -The active bet, why it is preferred, and alternatives rejected for now. - -### Proof spine -The ordered capabilities or claims that must be demonstrated. - -### Active frontiers -The next proof-producing moves, why now, and what they unlock. - -### Risks, assumptions and unknowns -Confidence, evidence, consequence, retirement test and fallback. - -### Commitments and cut lines -Must / should / stretch / defer, with dates or evidence that trigger cuts. - -### Issue projection -Issues mapped onto objectives and proofs; overlaps, gaps and trade-offs. -Links to the live coordination graph rather than mirroring its state. - -### Replan triggers -Events that require reconsidering the strategy. - -### Recent confidence shifts -Only consequential learning; stable truth graduates elsewhere. -``` - -The key vocabulary could be: - -- **Objective:** desired outcome. -- **Obligation:** condition that must remain true. -- **Constraint:** unavailable or prohibited option. -- **Pressure:** fact that changes trade-offs, such as time. -- **Unknown:** material unanswered question. -- **Risk:** uncertain adverse outcome. -- **Bet:** chosen strategy under uncertainty. -- **Proof:** evidence that supports an objective or retires risk. -- **Frontier:** strategically selected next proof—not merely unblocked work. -- **Cut line:** condition under which scope is reduced or fallback selected. - -### Relationship to existing artifacts - -```diagram -Specs / ADRs ───────▶ obligations and design truth -Code / tests ───────▶ implementation evidence -Linear ─────────────▶ work inventory and hard dependencies -COORDINATION.md ────▶ issue topology, seams and registry - │ - ▼ - STEERING.md - strategy and next action -``` - -I would keep `COORDINATION.md` narrow rather than expanding it indefinitely. The steering surface consumes its graph projection while owning priority and rationale. - -### Adoption approach - -Start with the document and run it manually for the September effort. Avoid building a family of skills before the operating loop has been exercised. - -After a few real updates, stable routines could become local skills: - -1. **Orient** — assemble current evidence and identify drift. -2. **Steer** — select or revise the strategic frontier. -3. **Reconcile** — incorporate completed work and confidence shifts. -4. **Pressure-test** — challenge the proof spine, assumptions and cut lines. - -“Steering” is my strongest candidate, but I would treat the name as provisional until we use the model on the current elicitor plan. - -## User - -I like it. Let's run it on the current plan, both the explict (existing) parts and the implicit/projected ones per your observations in this thread. Let the September Demo effort's own content be the driver of the document structure, at least on this first pass (don't let our imagined headings and ontologies become forms to be filled for their own sake). Run it all past the elicitor when you're done for a sanity and comprehensiveness check WRT our findings and decisions above - -## Assistant - -*(cancelled)* - -I’ll create the first steering artifact as an evidence-backed September execution model, not a generic template. It will reconcile the existing coordination/spec/issue material with the architectural gaps established here, while leaving Linear state unchanged. - -I’ll then audit it against the actual elicitor flow and its missing feedback loops. The current Brunch agent cannot itself perform that strategic review, so I’m interpreting “past the elicitor” as a systematic check against the elicitor - -## User - -Sorry I meant "run it all past the oracle when you're done..." above, not the "elicitor" - -## Assistant - -Understood—I’ll draft the steering artifact, self-review it against the elicitor architecture and live plan, then ask Oracle for an independent sanity and comprehensiveness review before finalizing it. - -## Assistant - -I’m turning the discussion into a live steering model, not a generic planning template. Its center will be the September reviewer loop, with the current architecture and issue graph treated as evidence and constraints rather than as the plan itself. - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "rg -n \"captureStore\\.read|captureStore|targetDocumentIdFor|conversationId|supersedes|active.*head|proposal\" packages/binding-flue/src/index.ts packages/core/src apps/brunch-agent/src/petrinaut-chat.ts 2>/dev/null | head -160", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash", - "timeout_ms": 10000 -} -``` - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "rg -n \"client tool|tool-result|tool result|brunch_ask|readPetrinaut|write|apply|Petrinaut\" libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/transport-aisdk/src apps/brunch-agent/src apps/petrinaut-website/src 2>/dev/null | head -200", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash", - "timeout_ms": 10000 -} -``` - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "rg -n \"ElicitationPack|completion|cards|schema|fold|demand|projection\" libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-gherkin/src | head -220", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash", - "timeout_ms": 10000 -} -``` - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "git status --short -- docs/INDEX.md docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md; printf '%s\\n' '--- all worktree status ---'; git status --short", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash", - "timeout_ms": 10000 -} -``` - -## User - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CeZJSBoqePV9R2KWIqc` - -``` -{ - "output": "apps/brunch-agent/src/petrinaut-chat.ts:33:const targetDocumentIdFor = (conversationId: string): string =>\napps/brunch-agent/src/petrinaut-chat.ts:34: `petrinaut-local:${conversationId}`;\napps/brunch-agent/src/petrinaut-chat.ts:37: conversationId: string,\napps/brunch-agent/src/petrinaut-chat.ts:41: const agent = init(GherkinElicitor, { id: conversationId });\napps/brunch-agent/src/petrinaut-chat.ts:44: initialData: { targetDocumentId: targetDocumentIdFor(conversationId) },\napps/brunch-agent/src/petrinaut-chat.ts:64: input.conversationId,\napps/brunch-agent/src/petrinaut-chat.ts:74: input.conversationId,\napps/brunch-agent/src/petrinaut-chat.ts:75: targetDocumentIdFor(input.conversationId),\napps/brunch-agent/src/petrinaut-chat.ts:78: await session.historyReader.peek(input.conversationId),\napps/brunch-agent/src/petrinaut-chat.ts:89: input.conversationId,\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CeZJSg2bY9mqNZsXPSL` - -``` -{ - "output": "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/transport-aisdk/src/index.ts:136: * Ask-return support. Absent, every tool-result follow-up stays refused\nlibs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/transport-aisdk/src/index.ts:179: readonly reason: \"tool-result-follow-up-not-supported\";\nlibs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/transport-aisdk/src/index.ts:196: reason: \"tool-result-follow-up-not-supported\",\nlibs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/transport-aisdk/src/index.ts:261: * Classify one tool-result follow-up POST. A human answer submitted through\nlibs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/transport-aisdk/src/index.ts:263: * machine tool result: exactly one submitted `brunch_ask` output on the\nlibs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/transport-aisdk/src/index.ts:265: * Petrinaut mutation outputs, the synthetic diagnostics message — remains\nlibs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/transport-aisdk/src/index.ts:587: execute: async ({ writer }) => {\nlibs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/transport-aisdk/src/index.ts:592: // panel as an awaiting client tool, and the harness's own output\nlibs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/transport-aisdk/src/index.ts:600: writer.write({\nlibs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/transport-aisdk/src/index.ts:626: writer.write(toUiChunk(wireEvent));\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/brunch-demo/brunch-petrinaut.tsx:8:import { Petrinaut, type ViewportAction } from \"@hashintel/petrinaut/ui\";\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/brunch-demo/brunch-petrinaut.tsx:14: PetrinautDocHandle,\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/brunch-demo/brunch-petrinaut.tsx:21:const BrunchPetrinautWithHandle = ({\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/brunch-demo/brunch-petrinaut.tsx:32: const [handle] = useState(() =>\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/brunch-demo/brunch-petrinaut.tsx:46: \napps/brunch-agent/src/petrinaut-chat.ts:1:/** Application composition for Petrinaut's stock AI SDK chat transport. */\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/brunch-demo/brunch-frame-parsers.ts:50: * Brunch execution-plan shape into a read-only Petrinaut SDCPN for rendering.\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/optimization-demo/petrinaut-opt-optimization.ts:2: attachPetrinautOptimizationRunStream,\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/optimization-demo/petrinaut-opt-optimization.ts:3: createPetrinautOptimizerClient,\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/optimization-demo/petrinaut-opt-optimization.ts:4: PetrinautOptimizerHttpError,\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/optimization-demo/petrinaut-opt-optimization.ts:9: PetrinautOptimization,\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/optimization-demo/petrinaut-opt-optimization.ts:10: PetrinautOptimizationEvent,\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/optimization-demo/petrinaut-opt-optimization.ts:12:import type { PetrinautOptimizerFetch } from \"@local/petrinaut-optimizer-client\";\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/optimization-demo/petrinaut-opt-optimization.ts:15: * Dev-proxy base for the local Petrinaut Optimizer: `vite.config.ts` rewrites\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/optimization-demo/petrinaut-opt-optimization.ts:27: * Stamp the duck-typed classification fields Petrinaut's optimization\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/optimization-demo/petrinaut-opt-optimization.ts:33: error instanceof PetrinautOptimizerHttpError\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/optimization-demo/petrinaut-opt-optimization.ts:66: error instanceof PetrinautOptimizerHttpError\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/optimization-demo/petrinaut-opt-optimization.ts:72:/** Create the local-only Petrinaut capability backed directly by Python. */\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/optimization-demo/petrinaut-opt-optimization.ts:73:export const createPetrinautOptOptimization = (\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/optimization-demo/petrinaut-opt-optimization.ts:74: fetchImpl: PetrinautOptimizerFetch = fetch,\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/optimization-demo/petrinaut-opt-optimization.ts:75:): PetrinautOptimization => {\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/optimization-demo/petrinaut-opt-optimization.ts:76: const client = createPetrinautOptimizerClient(\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/optimization-demo/petrinaut-opt-optimization.ts:100: let events: AsyncIterable;\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/optimization-demo/petrinaut-opt-optimization.ts:102: ({ events } = await attachPetrinautOptimizationRunStream({\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/brunch-demo/brunch-status-page.tsx:58: Back to Petrinaut\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/brunch-demo/brunch-protocol.ts:45: * This is intentionally not Petrinaut's full SDCPN document format. It only\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/brunch-demo/brunch-protocol.ts:53: * creating a read-only handle with Petrinaut extensions disabled.\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/brunch-demo/brunch-protocol.ts:56: * Brunch/Petrinaut protocol once that protocol is owned in Petrinaut Core.\napps/brunch-agent/src/routes.ts:4:/** Stock `DefaultChatTransport` endpoint used by Petrinaut's local panel. */\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/brunch-demo/brunch-route.ts:2: * This is temporary, until Petrinaut Demo app gets a real Router.\napps/brunch-agent/src/agents/gherkin-elicitor.ts:54: * demo shell is chartered to mount this library alongside the Petrinaut\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/optimization-demo/optimization-demo-app.tsx:2:import { PetrinautOptOptimizationProvider } from \"./petrinaut-opt-optimization-provider\";\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/optimization-demo/optimization-demo-app.tsx:5: \napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/optimization-demo/optimization-demo-app.tsx:7: \napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/optimization-demo/petrinaut-opt-optimization.test.ts:3:import { createPetrinautOptOptimization } from \"./petrinaut-opt-optimization\";\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/optimization-demo/petrinaut-opt-optimization.test.ts:5:import type { PetrinautOptimizationInput } from \"@hashintel/petrinaut-core\";\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/optimization-demo/petrinaut-opt-optimization.test.ts:10:} as PetrinautOptimizationInput;\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/optimization-demo/petrinaut-opt-optimization.test.ts:12:describe(\"createPetrinautOptOptimization\", () => {\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/optimization-demo/petrinaut-opt-optimization.test.ts:33: const optimization = createPetrinautOptOptimization(fetchImpl);\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/optimization-demo/petrinaut-opt-optimization.test.ts:72: const optimization = createPetrinautOptOptimization(fetchImpl);\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/optimization-demo/petrinaut-opt-optimization-provider.tsx:1:import { PetrinautOptimizationContext } from \"@hashintel/petrinaut/react\";\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/optimization-demo/petrinaut-opt-optimization-provider.tsx:3:import { createPetrinautOptOptimization } from \"./petrinaut-opt-optimization\";\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/optimization-demo/petrinaut-opt-optimization-provider.tsx:7:const petrinautOptOptimization = createPetrinautOptOptimization();\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/optimization-demo/petrinaut-opt-optimization-provider.tsx:9:/** Direct Petrinaut Opt integration for the local demo website only. */\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/optimization-demo/petrinaut-opt-optimization-provider.tsx:10:export const PetrinautOptOptimizationProvider: FC = ({\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/optimization-demo/petrinaut-opt-optimization-provider.tsx:13: \napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/optimization-demo/petrinaut-opt-optimization-provider.tsx:15: \napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/local-storage-demo/brunch-ask-interactive-tool.tsx:12: definePetrinautAiInteractiveTool,\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/local-storage-demo/brunch-ask-interactive-tool.tsx:143:export const brunchAskInteractiveTool = definePetrinautAiInteractiveTool({\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/local-storage-demo/local-storage-demo-app.tsx:7: type PetrinautDocHandle,\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/local-storage-demo/local-storage-demo-app.tsx:8: type PetrinautHandleCapabilities,\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/local-storage-demo/local-storage-demo-app.tsx:13: Petrinaut,\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/local-storage-demo/local-storage-demo-app.tsx:14: type PetrinautAiChatTransport,\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/local-storage-demo/local-storage-demo-app.tsx:15: type PetrinautAiMessage,\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/local-storage-demo/local-storage-demo-app.tsx:74:} satisfies PetrinautHandleCapabilities;\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/local-storage-demo/local-storage-demo-app.tsx:76:const createHandle = (net: SDCPNInLocalStorage): PetrinautDocHandle =>\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/local-storage-demo/local-storage-demo-app.tsx:83:const petrinautAiChatTransport: PetrinautAiChatTransport =\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/local-storage-demo/local-storage-demo-app.tsx:100: handle: PetrinautDocHandle;\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/local-storage-demo/local-storage-demo-app.tsx:112: * Local-storage demo shell for Petrinaut.\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/local-storage-demo/local-storage-demo-app.tsx:115: * Petrinaut document handle owns the currently open net's live editable state.\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/local-storage-demo/local-storage-demo-app.tsx:263: onMessages: (messages: PetrinautAiMessage[]) => {\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/local-storage-demo/local-storage-demo-app.tsx:299: ;\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/local-storage-demo/walkthrough/walkthrough-steps.tsx:28: Welcome to Petrinaut\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/local-storage-demo/walkthrough/walkthrough-steps.tsx:34: Petrinaut is a workshop for building, simulating, and\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/local-storage-demo/walkthrough/walkthrough-steps.tsx:46: videoAlt: \"The Petrinaut editor with an example net on the canvas\",\napps/petrinaut-website/src/main/app/local-storage-demo/walkthrough/walkthrough-steps.tsx:59: Petrinaut lets you run experiments on complex\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CeZJT4MsLJLaJGxncm4` - -``` -{ - "output": "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/plugin-gherkin/src/index.ts:51: schema: StatementNotedProposal,\nlibs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/testing/index.ts:41: schema: fixtureProposalSchema,\nlibs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/session-log.ts:12: /** Stable identity supplied by the substrate's public projection. */\nlibs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/session-log.ts:24: /** Substrate projection identity, distinct from the harness session id. */\nlibs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/sweep-protocol.ts:22: proposals: v.array(plugin.proposalCatalog[0].schema),\nlibs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/sweep-protocol.ts:227: `Use only the declared proposal schema: ${plugin.proposalNames.join(\", \")}. Do not add parsed structure or undeclared proposal types.`,\nlibs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/sweep-protocol.ts:297: \"Projection and validation are read-time operations; do not treat sweep completion as a stored derived result.\",\nlibs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/capture-store.ts:294:// Range ordering belongs to this schema rather than to any one caller: every\nlibs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/capture-store.ts:746: // States what the schema checked, and no more: the spans are structurally\nlibs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/capture-store.ts:748: // having been resolved against an entry projection.\nlibs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/capture-store.ts:1111: // Through the same schema a persisted issue is read with, so a command\nlibs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/capture-store.ts:1131: // than in the schema: a closed conflict's captures are legitimately\nlibs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin.ts:11: * target has stressed it, so nothing in this scaffold ratifies the SDK export\nlibs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin.ts:29: readonly schema: v.GenericSchema;\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CeZJTSUcr5qWmnMmPHy` - -``` -{ - "output": "--- all worktree status ---\n M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/git-workflow.md\n M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/issue-writing.md\n M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/legibility.md\n M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/hash-monorepo-import-plan.md\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -## Assistant - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "sed -n '1,240p' packages/core/src/plugin.ts; sed -n '180,340p' packages/core/src/sweep-protocol.ts", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent", - "timeout_ms": 10000 -} -``` - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "rg -n \"captureStore|sweep|archive|read\\(\" packages/binding-flue/src/index.ts; sed -n '300,560p' packages/binding-flue/src/index.ts", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent", - "timeout_ms": 10000 -} -``` - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "sed -n '1,120p' ../../../apps/brunch-agent/src/petrinaut-chat.ts; sed -n '240,290p' packages/transport-aisdk/src/index.ts; sed -n '120,210p' packages/transport-aisdk/src/index.ts", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent", - "timeout_ms": 10000 -} -``` - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "sed -n '1,120p' packages/plugin-gherkin/src/index.ts; sed -n '1,170p' ../../../apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/gherkin-elicitor.ts", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent", - "timeout_ms": 10000 -} -``` - -## User - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CeZZ7NzVgHV9ojR89cd` - -``` -{ - "output": "import * as v from \"valibot\";\n\nimport type { CaptureInputProposal } from \"./capture-store\";\n\n/**\n * The plugin descriptor — identity only, at this stage.\n *\n * The plugin's real surface is its packs and the four operations (spec §6.1,\n * §11.1). Those are **deliberately absent here**: spec §13's two-targets rule\n * says the trivial target must not freeze the plugin contract before the hard\n * target has stressed it, so nothing in this scaffold ratifies the SDK export\n * surface. What the descriptor fixes now is only what the topology needs —\n * that a plugin declares which target-domain it defines, and does so through\n * Valibot like every other boundary in the system (spec §12.4).\n */\nexport const PluginDescriptor = v.object({\n /** Package-level identity, matching the `plugin-*` role prefix (spec §12.2). */\n name: v.pipe(\n v.string(),\n v.regex(/^plugin-[a-z][a-z0-9-]*$/, \"expected a `plugin-` name\"),\n ),\n /** The artifact family this plugin elicits — gherkin scenarios, assurance arguments. */\n targetDomain: v.pipe(v.string(), v.nonEmpty()),\n});\n\nexport interface PluginProposalType {\n readonly name: string;\n readonly description: string;\n readonly schema: v.GenericSchema;\n}\n\nexport type Plugin = v.InferOutput & {\n /** FE-1392's declared floor; FE-1393 grows the catalog and SDK around it. */\n readonly proposalCatalog: readonly [PluginProposalType];\n};\n\n/**\n * Declare a plugin. Inversion of control (spec §4): the plugin declares and\n * registers; the harness discovers, orders, and invokes. Nothing a plugin\n * declares can reach persistence — the storage port is harness-defined and\n * binding-implemented, and plugins are storage-blind (spec §9.6).\n */\nexport function definePlugin(descriptor: Plugin): Plugin {\n const identity = v.parse(PluginDescriptor, descriptor);\n const [proposal, ...extraProposals] = descriptor.proposalCatalog;\n if (!proposal || extraProposals.length > 0) {\n throw new TypeError(\n \"This slice requires exactly one declared proposal type.\",\n );\n }\n const name = v.parse(v.pipe(v.string(), v.nonEmpty()), proposal.name);\n const description = v.parse(\n v.pipe(v.string(), v.nonEmpty()),\n proposal.description,\n );\n return {\n ...identity,\n proposalCatalog: [{ ...proposal, name, description }],\n };\n}\n ...parsedState,\n lastCheckedUserEntryId: parsedState.sweptThroughUserEntryId,\n });\n};\n\nconst renderEntry = (entry: SweepSessionEntry): readonly string[] => {\n const rendered: string[] = [];\n for (const affordance of entry.affordances ?? []) {\n rendered.push(`[assistant ask] ${affordance.markdown}`);\n }\n if (entry.text.length > 0) {\n const label = isTrueUserEntry(entry) ? \"user\" : entry.kind;\n rendered.push(`[${label}] ${entry.text}`);\n }\n return rendered;\n};\n\nconst renderTail = (tail: readonly SweepSessionEntry[]): string =>\n tail.flatMap(renderEntry).join(\"\\n\");\n\nexport interface SettlementCheckSignal {\n readonly type: \"settlement-check\";\n readonly tagName: \"settlement-check\";\n readonly body: string;\n}\n\nexport const buildSettlementCheckSignal = (\n tail: readonly SweepSessionEntry[],\n): SettlementCheckSignal => ({\n type: \"settlement-check\",\n tagName: \"settlement-check\",\n body: [\n \"The harness computed this unswept conversation tail:\",\n renderTail(tail),\n `Judge whether this range has settled. If it has, call ${toolName(\"sweep\")}. Declining is legal; continue the interview when the topic is still open.`,\n ].join(\"\\n\\n\"),\n});\n\nexport const buildSweepExtractionPrompt = (\n plugin: {\n readonly targetDomain: string;\n readonly proposalNames: readonly string[];\n },\n tail: readonly SweepSessionEntry[],\n): string =>\n [\n `Extract capture proposals for the ${plugin.targetDomain} target from this settled conversation range.`,\n `Use only the declared proposal schema: ${plugin.proposalNames.join(\", \")}. Do not add parsed structure or undeclared proposal types.`,\n \"Every user-grounded proposal must cite one or more exact verbatim quotes from the user lines below. Never supply entry ids, ranges, pointers, or evidence sources; the harness resolves those.\",\n \"The declared verbatim interior must preserve what was said without paraphrase or normalization. Return an empty proposal list when no honest capture is available.\",\n renderTail(tail),\n ].join(\"\\n\\n\");\n\nexport interface SweepRepairSignal {\n readonly type: \"sweep-repair\";\n readonly tagName: \"sweep-repair\";\n readonly body: string;\n}\n\nexport const buildSweepRepairSignal = (\n refusal: Pick | SweepRefusalFact,\n): SweepRepairSignal => ({\n type: \"sweep-repair\",\n tagName: \"sweep-repair\",\n body: `The sweep was refused: ${refusal.message} Repair the proposal and call ${toolName(\"sweep\")} again. Declining is legal.`,\n});\n\nexport const pendingSweepRepair = (\n entries: readonly SweepSessionEntry[],\n): SweepRefusalFact | null => {\n let pending: SweepRefusalFact | null = null;\n for (const entry of entries) {\n if (entry.sweepRepairSignal) pending = null;\n if (entry.sweepResult?.status === \"refused\" && entry.sweepResult.refusal) {\n pending = entry.sweepResult.refusal;\n } else if (entry.sweepResult && entry.sweepResult.status !== \"refused\") {\n pending = null;\n }\n }\n return pending;\n};\n\nexport interface UnaccountedAskAdvisory {\n readonly type: \"unaccounted-ask\";\n readonly affordanceId: string;\n readonly question: string;\n readonly message: string;\n}\n\nexport const computeUnaccountedAskAdvisories = (\n tail: readonly SweepSessionEntry[],\n capturedUserEntryIds: ReadonlySet,\n): readonly UnaccountedAskAdvisory[] => {\n const accountedAffordanceIds = new Set(\n tail.flatMap((entry) =>\n entry.replyToAffordanceId === undefined ||\n !capturedUserEntryIds.has(entry.id)\n ? []\n : [entry.replyToAffordanceId],\n ),\n );\n return tail.flatMap((entry) =>\n (entry.affordances ?? [])\n .filter((affordance) => !accountedAffordanceIds.has(affordance.id))\n .map((affordance) => ({\n type: \"unaccounted-ask\" as const,\n affordanceId: affordance.id,\n question: affordance.markdown,\n message:\n \"The swept range contains an ask with no affordance-bound capture.\",\n })),\n );\n};\n\nexport const settlementProtocolInstructionFragments = (): readonly string[] => [\n \"When the harness reports an unswept tail, judge whether that range has settled. Declining is legal.\",\n `When it has settled, call ${toolName(\"sweep\")}. The harness privately extracts quote-anchored proposals, refreshes durable history, applies them atomically, and advances the swept high-water mark only on success.`,\n \"Projection and validation are read-time operations; do not treat sweep completion as a stored derived result.\",\n];\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CeZZ7m3yMGGMRQHGE53` - -``` -{ - "output": "45: sweepableRange,\n78: readonly captureStore: CaptureStore;\n100: \"sweepHighWater\",\n104: let sweepState = parseSweepState(storedSweepState);\n139: name: toolName(\"sweep\"),\n141: \"Apply or replay the settled conversation prefix. The harness privately extracts quote-anchored captures, refreshes durable history immediately before atomic application, and advances sweep state only on success.\",\n152: const range = sweepableRange(historyAtJudgment);\n159: \"extract-sweep-proposals\",\n178: // archive write makes every quote resolvable before the store sees it.\n181: await session.historyReader.read(session.sessionId),\n184: const applied = await step.do(\"apply-sweep\", () =>\n185: session.captureStore.execute(\n187: type: \"apply-sweep\",\n196: sweepState = reopenSweepAfterRefusal(sweepState);\n197: setSweepState(sweepState);\n203: sweepState = advanceSweepHighWater(sweepState, throughUserEntryId);\n204: setSweepState(sweepState);\n206: session.captureStore,\n246: state: sweepState,\n251: sweepState = decision.nextState;\n252: setSweepState(sweepState);\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CeZZ8SSapF1CCmTDc8k` - -``` -{ - "output": "/** Application composition for Petrinaut's stock AI SDK chat transport. */\n\nimport { init } from \"@flue/runtime\";\n\nimport {\n decideAskReplyAdmission,\n pendingAskAffordanceId,\n} from \"@hashintel/brunch-agent\";\nimport {\n createFlueReplyProjector,\n projectFlueHistoryForSweep,\n} from \"@hashintel/brunch-agent-binding-flue\";\nimport {\n createAiSdkChatHandler,\n type HarnessReplyEvent,\n type TransportInspectionEvent,\n} from \"@hashintel/brunch-agent-transport-aisdk\";\n\nimport { GherkinElicitor } from \"./agents/gherkin-elicitor.ts\";\nimport { createGherkinElicitationSession } from \"./elicitation-session.ts\";\n\nconst inspect =\n process.env.BRUNCH_TRANSPORT_AISDK_INSPECT === \"1\"\n ? (event: TransportInspectionEvent): void => {\n // This is an opt-in shell diagnostic stream. It is never dispatched\n // into Flue and therefore cannot become elicitation evidence.\n console.log(`TRANSPORT_AISDK ${JSON.stringify(event)}`);\n }\n : undefined;\n\n// FE-1439 replaces this local one-conversation/one-document identity\n// with principal-owned private session lookup. Keep it opaque here.\nconst targetDocumentIdFor = (conversationId: string): string =>\n `petrinaut-local:${conversationId}`;\n\nconst streamElicitorTurn = async (\n conversationId: string,\n dispatch: { readonly message: string; readonly idempotencyKey: string },\n emit: (event: HarnessReplyEvent) => void,\n): Promise => {\n const agent = init(GherkinElicitor, { id: conversationId });\n const receipt = await agent.dispatch({\n ...dispatch,\n initialData: { targetDocumentId: targetDocumentIdFor(conversationId) },\n });\n const projector = createFlueReplyProjector({\n submissionId: receipt.submissionId,\n emit,\n });\n await agent.read(receipt, { onEvent: (chunk) => projector.accept(chunk) });\n};\n\nexport const petrinautChatHandler = createAiSdkChatHandler({\n allowedOrigins: (\n process.env.BRUNCH_PETRINAUT_ORIGINS ??\n \"http://127.0.0.1:4915,http://localhost:4915\"\n )\n .split(\",\")\n .map((origin) => origin.trim())\n .filter((origin) => origin.length > 0),\n inspect,\n runTurn: (input, emit) =>\n streamElicitorTurn(\n input.conversationId,\n { message: input.userMessage.text, idempotencyKey: input.idempotencyKey },\n emit,\n ),\n askReply: {\n // Admission consults durable Flue history, not request-shaped claims: the\n // submission resumes the conversation only when its tool-call id\n // correlates with the one ask still awaiting a reply.\n async admit(input) {\n const session = createGherkinElicitationSession(\n input.conversationId,\n targetDocumentIdFor(input.conversationId),\n );\n const entries = projectFlueHistoryForSweep(\n await session.historyReader.peek(input.conversationId),\n );\n return decideAskReplyAdmission(\n pendingAskAffordanceId(entries),\n input.ask.toolCallId,\n );\n },\n // The admitted answer is a fresh user dispatch (spec §7.4); the binding\n // binds it to the pending affordance, making it the user-affordance reply.\n run: (input, emit) =>\n streamElicitorTurn(\n input.conversationId,\n { message: input.ask.answer, idempotencyKey: input.idempotencyKey },\n emit,\n ),\n },\n});\n \"text\" in part &&\n typeof part.text === \"string\",\n )\n .map((part) => part.text)\n .join(\"\");\n return text.length > 0 ? text : undefined;\n};\n\ntype ParsedTransportRequest =\n | { readonly kind: \"initial\"; readonly value: HarnessTurnInput }\n | { readonly kind: \"ask-reply\"; readonly value: HarnessAskReplyInput }\n | { readonly kind: \"refused\"; readonly refusal: TransportRequestRefusal };\n\nconst isAnsweredAskPart = (\n part: NonNullable[number],\n): boolean =>\n ((part.type === \"dynamic-tool\" && part.toolName === ASK_TOOL_NAME) ||\n part.type === `tool-${ASK_TOOL_NAME}`) &&\n part.state === \"output-available\";\n\n/**\n * Classify one tool-result follow-up POST. A human answer submitted through\n * the registered ask component travels tool-output-shaped but is not a\n * machine tool result: exactly one submitted `brunch_ask` output on the\n * referenced assistant message is a candidate reply. Everything else —\n * Petrinaut mutation outputs, the synthetic diagnostics message — remains\n * the machine-input protocol this transport still refuses (FE-1438 owns it).\n */\nconst parseAskReplyTurn = (body: PanelPostBody): ParsedTransportRequest => {\n if (\n typeof body.id !== \"string\" ||\n body.id.length === 0 ||\n typeof body.messageId !== \"string\" ||\n body.messageId.length === 0 ||\n body.trigger !== \"submit-message\" ||\n !Array.isArray(body.messages)\n ) {\n return {\n kind: \"refused\",\n refusal: transportRequestRefusals.invalidChatRequest,\n };\n }\n\n const message = body.messages.find(\n (candidate) =>\n candidate.id === body.messageId && candidate.role === \"assistant\",\n );\n const askParts = (message?.parts ?? []).filter(isAnsweredAskPart);\n if (askParts.length === 0) {\n return {\n kind: \"refused\",\n readonly type: \"ask-reply-admitted\";\n readonly requestId: string;\n readonly conversationId: string;\n readonly toolCallId: string;\n }\n | {\n readonly type: \"ask-reply-refused\";\n readonly requestId: string;\n readonly conversationId: string;\n readonly toolCallId: string;\n readonly reason: \"no-pending-ask\" | \"different-ask-pending\";\n };\n\nexport interface AiSdkChatHandlerOptions {\n readonly runTurn: HarnessTurnRunner;\n /**\n * Ask-return support. Absent, every tool-result follow-up stays refused\n * (the FE-1436 negative contract); present, exactly the pending ask's\n * correlated submission resumes the conversation.\n */\n readonly askReply?: AskReplyHandler;\n /** Exact browser origins allowed to call this endpoint across origins. */\n readonly allowedOrigins?: readonly string[];\n /** Opt-in diagnostic sink. Events are metadata only and never re-enter the conversation. */\n readonly inspect?: (event: TransportInspectionEvent) => void;\n}\n\nconst panelPartSchema = v.looseObject({\n type: v.optional(v.unknown()),\n text: v.optional(v.unknown()),\n toolName: v.optional(v.unknown()),\n toolCallId: v.optional(v.unknown()),\n state: v.optional(v.unknown()),\n output: v.optional(v.unknown()),\n});\n\nconst panelMessageSchema = v.looseObject({\n id: v.optional(v.unknown()),\n role: v.optional(v.unknown()),\n parts: v.optional(v.array(panelPartSchema)),\n});\n\nconst panelPostBodySchema = v.looseObject({\n id: v.optional(v.unknown()),\n messageId: v.optional(v.unknown()),\n messages: v.optional(v.array(panelMessageSchema)),\n trigger: v.optional(v.unknown()),\n});\n\ntype PanelMessage = v.InferOutput;\ntype PanelPostBody = v.InferOutput;\n\ntype TransportRequestRefusal =\n | {\n readonly reason: \"invalid-chat-request\";\n readonly status: 400;\n readonly error: \"invalid_chat_request\";\n }\n | {\n readonly reason: \"tool-result-follow-up-not-supported\";\n readonly status: 422;\n readonly error: \"tool_result_follow_up_not_supported\";\n }\n | {\n readonly reason: \"invalid-ask-submission\";\n readonly status: 400;\n readonly error: \"invalid_ask_submission\";\n };\n\nconst transportRequestRefusals = {\n invalidChatRequest: {\n reason: \"invalid-chat-request\",\n status: 400,\n error: \"invalid_chat_request\",\n },\n toolResultFollowUpNotSupported: {\n reason: \"tool-result-follow-up-not-supported\",\n status: 422,\n error: \"tool_result_follow_up_not_supported\",\n },\n invalidAskSubmission: {\n reason: \"invalid-ask-submission\",\n status: 400,\n error: \"invalid_ask_submission\",\n },\n} as const satisfies Record;\n\nconst askReplyRefusalErrors = {\n \"no-pending-ask\": \"ask_not_pending\",\n \"different-ask-pending\": \"ask_mismatch\",\n} as const;\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CeZZ8wgHAAtTub6xUHz` - -``` -{ - "output": "/**\n * `@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-gherkin` — the gherkin target-domain (spec §13.1).\n *\n * The tracer target: cheap enough to wire end-to-end first, and deliberately\n * trivial, so it must not be the plugin that freezes the contract (spec §13's\n * two-targets-on-each-axis rule). Its packs, `project`, and `validate` land\n * with their own slice.\n *\n * **This package resolves `@hashintel/brunch-agent` and nothing else** — never the binding,\n * never Flue. Target policy has no business knowing which substrate it is\n * running on, and it is storage-blind besides (spec §9.6).\n */\n\nimport * as v from \"valibot\";\n\nimport { definePlugin } from \"@hashintel/brunch-agent\";\n\nconst nonEmptyString = v.pipe(v.string(), v.nonEmpty());\nconst evidenceQuote = v.strictObject({ excerpt: nonEmptyString });\n\nconst StatementNotedProposal = v.pipe(\n v.strictObject({\n evidence: v.pipe(v.array(evidenceQuote), v.minLength(1)),\n epistemicStatus: v.literal(\"explicit\"),\n confidence: v.picklist([\"firm\", \"hedged\", \"speculative\"]),\n content: v.strictObject({\n value: v.strictObject({\n type: v.literal(\"statement-noted\"),\n interior: v.strictObject({ verbatim: nonEmptyString }),\n }),\n }),\n }),\n v.check(\n (proposal) =>\n proposal.evidence.some(\n (evidence) =>\n evidence.excerpt === proposal.content.value.interior.verbatim,\n ),\n \"The verbatim interior must equal one cited user quote.\",\n ),\n);\n\nexport const gherkin = definePlugin({\n name: \"plugin-gherkin\",\n targetDomain: \"gherkin\",\n proposalCatalog: [\n {\n name: \"statement-noted\",\n description:\n \"Record one condition-shaped statement at the verbatim grade floor, with no parsed structure.\",\n schema: StatementNotedProposal,\n },\n ],\n});\n\"use agent\";\n/**\n * The gherkin elicitor (spec §12.5: one agent per target).\n *\n * Named as a noun — the thing, not the act — and read target-first, so the\n * family sorts together as targets multiply: `gherkin-elicitor`,\n * `assurance-elicitor`.\n *\n * The product is the harness library in a thin host-authored agent — Flue's\n * build-time scan makes the alternative structurally unavailable, since a\n * library cannot ship a pre-registered agent (spec §12.1). So this module is\n * deliberately thin: it mounts harness capability and holds no elicitation\n * semantics of its own.\n *\n * Three recorded Flue constraints are honoured here by construction (spec §10):\n * the `'use agent'` directive is the file's first statement; `agentName` is a\n * pinned string literal, because conversation storage keys on it; and the tool\n * set is static, because prompt-cache economics forbid per-question tool\n * swapping.\n */\n\nimport { useInitialData, useModel, type AgentProps } from \"@flue/runtime\";\nimport * as v from \"valibot\";\n\nimport { useElicitation } from \"@hashintel/brunch-agent-binding-flue\";\nimport { gherkin } from \"@hashintel/brunch-agent-plugin-gherkin\";\n\nimport { createGherkinElicitationSession } from \"../elicitation-session.ts\";\n\n/**\n * One definition for the agent and the faux provider alike: the two must name\n * the same model id, and drift fails at resolution only if both sides resolve\n * the same string (Flue patterns audit, 2026-08-17).\n */\nexport const GHERKIN_MODEL_ID = \"claude-haiku-4-5\";\n\nexport function GherkinElicitor(props: AgentProps) {\n useModel(`anthropic/${GHERKIN_MODEL_ID}`);\n const initialData = useInitialData<{ targetDocumentId: string }>();\n return useElicitation(\n gherkin,\n createGherkinElicitationSession(props.id, initialData.targetDocumentId),\n );\n}\n\n/**\n * Pinned, and never to be edited: conversation storage keys on this literal,\n * so changing it orphans every existing conversation. Flue requires a string\n * literal here because build targets derive durable identifiers from it before\n * any user code runs.\n *\n * Product-prefixed on purpose, and this is the one place the prefix is not\n * cosmetic. Agent identities are global per application, and the September\n * demo shell is chartered to mount this library alongside the Petrinaut\n * libraries — a bare `gherkin-elicitor` could collide with another library's\n * agent, and the collision would land on durable conversation storage.\n *\n * The exported symbol stays the shorter `GherkinElicitor` because it reads\n * better at the mount site; `agentName` exists precisely to let durable\n * identity and source-level name differ.\n */\nGherkinElicitor.agentName = \"brunch-gherkin-elicitor\";\n\n/**\n * Session→document binding (spec §9.1, adjudication L4): a new session's\n * `initialData` carries the target-document id, validated once at creation and\n * immutable thereafter — Flue's own lane for a target descriptor. Dispatching\n * to an existing conversation id resumes that session against the current state\n * of its target-document.\n */\nGherkinElicitor.initialData = v.object({\n targetDocumentId: v.pipe(v.string(), v.nonEmpty()),\n});\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -## Assistant - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "sed -n '1,275p' packages/binding-flue/src/index.ts", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent", - "timeout_ms": 10000 -} -``` - -## User - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CeZeseLZ2GAIwyJ0ck0` - -``` -{ - "output": "/**\n * `@hashintel/brunch-agent-binding-flue` — the Flue binding.\n *\n * One binding per substrate. It implements the substrate-capability list\n * (spec §10), owns the local capture-store/session-log storage-port\n * implementation (spec §9.6), and is the\n * only shell allowed to know Flue's dialect: **the harness imports no\n * substrate; a binding imports both** (spec §4).\n *\n * Every time mechanism wants to land in here, the second-binding test applies\n * (spec §14.2): genuinely substrate-specific, or mechanism leaking into Flue's\n * dialect?\n */\n\nimport {\n useAgentFinish,\n useAgentStart,\n useDataWriter,\n useDelivery,\n usePersistentState,\n useTool,\n} from \"@flue/runtime\";\nimport * as v from \"valibot\";\n\nimport {\n ASK_TOOL_DESCRIPTION,\n AskInput,\n FreeTextAffordance,\n advanceSweepHighWater,\n askProtocolInstructionFragments,\n buildSettlementCheckSignal,\n buildReplyBindingSignalPayload,\n buildSweepExtractionPrompt,\n buildSweepRepairSignal,\n computeUnaccountedAskAdvisories,\n createSweepExtractionResultSchema,\n createInitialSweepState,\n decidePendingAffordance,\n decideSettlementTrigger,\n mintAskAffordance,\n parseSweepState,\n pendingSweepRepair,\n reopenSweepAfterRefusal,\n settlementProtocolInstructionFragments,\n sweepableRange,\n toolName,\n type CaptureStore,\n type FreeTextAffordanceValue,\n type Plugin,\n type SweepState,\n} from \"@hashintel/brunch-agent\";\n\nimport { capturedUserEntryIdsForSession } from \"./capture-accounting\";\nimport {\n projectFlueHistoryForSweep,\n type FlueHistoryReader,\n} from \"./history-reader\";\n\nconst SweepToolOutput = v.looseObject({\n status: v.picklist([\"no-settled-range\", \"refused\", \"applied\"]),\n});\n\nexport { CAPABILITIES, type Capability, type Provision } from \"./capabilities\";\nexport {\n createFlueHistoryReader,\n projectFlueHistoryForSweep,\n type FlueHistoryReaderOptions,\n} from \"./history-reader\";\nexport {\n createFlueReplyProjector,\n type FlueReplyProjector,\n type FlueReplyProjectorOptions,\n} from \"./reply-projector\";\nexport { createLocalCaptureStore } from \"./local-capture-store\";\n\nexport interface ElicitationSession {\n readonly sessionId: string;\n readonly captureStore: CaptureStore;\n readonly historyReader: FlueHistoryReader;\n}\n\n/**\n * Mount the elicitation harness in a Flue agent.\n *\n * Flue has no ask-the-user primitive, so the harness owns the turn-suspension\n * protocol: a `terminate: true` ask tool, the pending affordance in\n * per-session state, and the answer arriving as a fresh dispatch (spec §7.4).\n */\nexport function useElicitation(\n plugin: Plugin,\n session: ElicitationSession,\n): string {\n const delivery = useDelivery();\n const [pending, setPending] =\n usePersistentState(\n \"pendingAffordance\",\n null,\n );\n const [storedSweepState, setSweepState] = usePersistentState(\n \"sweepHighWater\",\n createInitialSweepState(),\n );\n let pendingAtFinish = pending;\n let sweepState = parseSweepState(storedSweepState);\n const extractionResult = createSweepExtractionResultSchema(plugin);\n const writeAffordance = useDataWriter(\"affordance\", {\n schema: FreeTextAffordance,\n });\n\n useAgentStart((ctx) => {\n if (delivery.kind !== \"user\" || pending === null) return;\n\n pendingAtFinish = null;\n setPending(null);\n ctx.append({ kind: \"signal\", ...buildReplyBindingSignalPayload(pending) });\n });\n\n useTool({\n name: toolName(\"ask\"),\n description: ASK_TOOL_DESCRIPTION,\n input: AskInput,\n output: FreeTextAffordance,\n run({ data, toolCallId }) {\n const affordance = mintAskAffordance(data.question, toolCallId);\n\n setPending((current) => {\n const decision = decidePendingAffordance(current, affordance);\n if (!decision.ok) throw new Error(decision.reason);\n pendingAtFinish = decision.pending;\n return decision.pending;\n });\n writeAffordance(affordance);\n\n return { output: affordance, terminate: true };\n },\n });\n\n useTool({\n name: toolName(\"sweep\"),\n description:\n \"Apply or replay the settled conversation prefix. The harness privately extracts quote-anchored captures, refreshes durable history immediately before atomic application, and advances sweep state only on success.\",\n input: v.strictObject({}),\n output: SweepToolOutput,\n harness: true,\n durable: true,\n async run({ harness, signal, step }) {\n const historyAtJudgment = await step.do(\"read-settled-range\", async () =>\n projectFlueHistoryForSweep(\n await session.historyReader.peek(session.sessionId),\n ),\n );\n const range = sweepableRange(historyAtJudgment);\n const throughUserEntryId = range.at(-1)?.id;\n if (!throughUserEntryId) {\n return { output: { status: \"no-settled-range\" as const } };\n }\n\n const extraction = await step.do(\n \"extract-sweep-proposals\",\n async () =>\n (\n await harness.prompt(\n buildSweepExtractionPrompt(\n {\n targetDomain: plugin.targetDomain,\n proposalNames: plugin.proposalCatalog.map(\n (proposal) => proposal.name,\n ),\n },\n range,\n ),\n { result: extractionResult, signal },\n )\n ).data,\n );\n\n // This read is intentionally adjacent to application: its binding-owned\n // archive write makes every quote resolvable before the store sees it.\n await step.do(\"refresh-history-before-apply\", async () =>\n projectFlueHistoryForSweep(\n await session.historyReader.read(session.sessionId),\n ),\n );\n const applied = await step.do(\"apply-sweep\", () =>\n session.captureStore.execute(\n {\n type: \"apply-sweep\",\n // The plugin schema narrows the existing envelope here; the store\n // repeats envelope validation and owns anchoring at apply.\n proposals: extraction.proposals,\n },\n { sessionId: session.sessionId },\n ),\n );\n if (!applied.ok) {\n sweepState = reopenSweepAfterRefusal(sweepState);\n setSweepState(sweepState);\n return {\n output: { status: \"refused\" as const, refusal: applied.refusal },\n };\n }\n\n sweepState = advanceSweepHighWater(sweepState, throughUserEntryId);\n setSweepState(sweepState);\n const accountedEntryIds = await capturedUserEntryIdsForSession(\n session.captureStore,\n applied.snapshot,\n session.sessionId,\n );\n return {\n output: {\n status: \"applied\" as const,\n appliedCaptureIds:\n \"appliedCaptureIds\" in applied.value\n ? applied.value.appliedCaptureIds\n : [],\n skippedDedupKeys:\n \"skippedDedupKeys\" in applied.value\n ? applied.value.skippedDedupKeys\n : [],\n advisories: [\n ...(\"advisories\" in applied.value ? applied.value.advisories : []),\n ...computeUnaccountedAskAdvisories(range, accountedEntryIds),\n ],\n },\n };\n },\n });\n\n useAgentFinish(async (ctx) => {\n // useAgentFinish also fires on terminate:true asks. The callback's local\n // view is updated by ask/reply callbacks in this render, so it observes the\n // live slot rather than the render-time persistent-state snapshot.\n if (pendingAtFinish !== null) return;\n\n const entries = projectFlueHistoryForSweep(\n await session.historyReader.peek(session.sessionId),\n );\n const repair = pendingSweepRepair(entries);\n if (repair) {\n ctx.append({ kind: \"signal\", ...buildSweepRepairSignal(repair) });\n return;\n }\n const decision = decideSettlementTrigger({\n entries,\n state: sweepState,\n pendingAffordance: false,\n });\n if (decision.action !== \"nudge\") return;\n\n sweepState = decision.nextState;\n setSweepState(sweepState);\n ctx.append({\n kind: \"signal\",\n ...buildSettlementCheckSignal(decision.tail),\n });\n });\n\n return [\n ...askProtocolInstructionFragments(plugin.targetDomain),\n ...settlementProtocolInstructionFragments(),\n ].join(\"\\n\\n\");\n}\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -## Assistant - -**Tool Use:** `apply_patch` - -```json -{ - "patchText": "*** Begin Patch\n*** Add File: /Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md\n+# Brunch steering model\n+\n+This is the current strategic understanding of Brunch: what outcome matters now, what the system\n+can actually do, which beliefs remain weak, and where to spend the next unit of time. Its immediate\n+decision horizon is the September demo, but it steers the whole context rather than one package or\n+one Linear map.\n+\n+This is not a roadmap, a specification, or an issue mirror. Specifications and accepted ADRs define\n+obligations and settled architecture. Linear is canonical for issue state, hierarchy, and hard\n+blockers. [COORDINATION](./COORDINATION.md) projects this strategy onto the mechanically available\n+work. This document owns the judgment between them: which objective to pursue under the current\n+time, evidence, risk, and product pressure; what to defer; and what new evidence would change that\n+choice. It may expose a conflict with a specification or ADR, but cannot silently override one.\n+\n+The document remains live. A steering pass orients from current evidence, chooses a frontier,\n+executes to a named proof, reconciles the result with specifications and issues, then replans only\n+where the evidence changed. Git carries the history; this file carries only the current model. Its\n+shape is intentionally specific to the present effort. Do not extract a generic template or skill\n+until a second real planning cycle shows which parts recur.\n+\n+## The September outcome\n+\n+As of **2026-08-24**, the working constraint is roughly two human weeks. The event date and final\n+business use case are not yet recorded here; Dora's confirmation is a decision gate, not an excuse\n+to leave the technical spine vague.\n+\n+FE-1476 (the September demo delivery) supplies the working scenario:\n+\n+1. A reviewer opens a prebuilt cyber-physical-process requirements model and its generated SDCPN in\n+ Petrinaut.\n+2. The reviewer selects or describes a net element and asks why it was modelled that way.\n+3. Brunch traces the answer through the requirements model and captures to an exact source\n+ utterance.\n+4. The reviewer scopes one correction and conducts three to five focused chat turns.\n+5. New or superseding captures change the elicited model; reprojection changes the corresponding\n+ part of the live net without rebuilding unrelated parts.\n+6. The resulting artifact is handed to the existing optimisation experiment flow.\n+\n+This is a **review-and-revise** demonstration. It does not need to prove that Brunch can elicit an\n+entire CPS model from a blank conversation. It does need to prove a closed semantic and interaction\n+loop. A chat transcript beside a static fixture, an unexplained net mutation, or a test that injects\n+wiring absent from the deployed entrypoint does not satisfy the outcome.\n+\n+The proof spine is therefore:\n+\n+```text\n+source utterance\n+ -> active typed capture\n+ -> folded CPS requirements model\n+ -> SDCPN element + provenance\n+ -> reviewer question and scoped correction\n+ -> superseding capture\n+ -> changed folded model\n+ -> changed live SDCPN\n+ -> optimisation handoff\n+```\n+\n+## Where the system actually stands\n+\n+The package topology is in place and the implemented tracer is real, but the September loop is not\n+an incremental extension of an almost-finished product. Most of the contract-bearing middle is\n+absent.\n+\n+| Surface | Evidence now | September consequence |\n+| --- | --- | --- |\n+| Ask, suspend, return | A user answer to `brunch_ask` survives the AI SDK/Flue boundary and resumes durable history. | Reuse; do not redesign the ask protocol. |\n+| Settlement and capture | A settled range is privately swept into quote-anchored captures and applied atomically. Supersession and active-head validation exist in the store. | Preserve as the evidence foundation, but expose active state to the controller. |\n+| Plugin SDK | The exported `Plugin` is deliberately only identity plus exactly one proposal type. Gherkin captures one verbatim statement. | There is no implemented fold, demand runner, model, projection, or useful hard-target plugin to extend. |\n+| Elicitation control | The agent receives general ask/sweep instructions. Sweep extraction sees a conversation range and proposal names only. No production path reads the active capture set or a derived model back into the interview. | Brunch cannot yet choose a next question from what it has learned or conduct a targeted correction. |\n+| CPS semantics | The three-register design and provisional two-schema/two-table plugin contract are desk-designed. No `plugin-cps` exists. | The critical semantic path must be built against a concrete CPS case, not inferred from Gherkin completeness. |\n+| Correction | The store can represent supersession, but extraction cannot see active capture IDs, model issues, or the target region; Gherkin cannot propose a supersession. | Targeted re-elicitation is structurally unreachable despite the storage mechanics being present. |\n+| Petrinaut transport | Local panel streaming and human ask-return work. Machine client-tool-result follow-ups are explicitly refused pending FE-1438 (the client-tool round-trip). | The agent cannot yet apply a projection to the live document and receive the result. |\n+| Session target | The current application derives `targetDocumentId` from `conversationId`. | A new reviewer session cannot address a pre-existing elicitation target without changing this identity boundary. |\n+| Demo website | The production website still uses its stock assistant route. The `/brunch` Actual Mode is a separate read-only fixture/SSE surface. | Local tracer proof must not be mistaken for deployed integration. |\n+\n+The decisive reading is that the current design is not too rigorous in its preservation of\n+evidence, correction, or register boundaries. It is too broad and too generic for the remaining\n+time. Completing generic plugin machinery, a second target, a full CPS ontology, and a cold-start\n+interviewer before crossing the real reviewer loop would optimize the library while leaving the\n+demo hollow.\n+\n+## The strategic bet\n+\n+Build the smallest honest **CPS review-and-revise loop** through all three registers and the real\n+Petrinaut entrypoint. Let that concrete implementation discover the minimum plugin interface, then\n+generalize only what the CPS case and existing Gherkin case both need.\n+\n+This is not permission to take another thin tracer as the definition of done. The vertical proof is\n+contract-bearing: it includes model assembly, provenance, targeted correction, reprojection,\n+application, and the deployed route. Breadth inside each layer may be narrow; no layer in that loop\n+may be a fixture masquerading as production wiring.\n+\n+The bet preserves these load-bearing decisions:\n+\n+- Captures remain the durable, source-grounded assertion register.\n+- Every semantic inference happens at write time and is recorded as a contestable capture.\n+- The elicited model is a pure fold over active captures and every model part names its supporting\n+ capture IDs.\n+- SDCPN projection consumes the elicited model without rereading the transcript or making hidden\n+ semantic judgments.\n+- Petrinaut application and diagnostics are separate from semantic projection: the application may\n+ use client tools to apply a projected artifact, but it does not become the authority that invents\n+ the model.\n+- A correction supersedes or adds assertions and re-runs the fold and projection; it does not patch\n+ an unexplained net element directly.\n+\n+FE-1480 (requirements-model-to-SDCPN inference) challenges the third and fourth decisions by\n+assuming the projection itself requires LLM inference. That assumption is unresolved. If a worked\n+CPS case proves that the register-2 model is insufficient for pure projection, the honest choices\n+are to record the missing semantic judgment as a capture before folding or to amend ADR-0003 (the\n+three-register IR) explicitly. Hiding inference inside a read-time projection is not an available\n+shortcut.\n+\n+## The elicitor architecture under this load\n+\n+The discussion began with four parts; the current model has five responsibilities across the\n+harness and plugin layers, plus one per-engagement input. The missing responsibility is the\n+controller that closes the loop between captured evidence and the next move.\n+\n+| Responsibility | Owner | What it contains | State and September obligation |\n+| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n+| Strategy repertoire | Harness | Orientations, motivations, conversational licences, interviewing techniques, and question-formulation guidance. | Partly researched, not operationally selected. Implement only the techniques used by the review-and-revise runbook. |\n+| Evidence engine | Harness | Archive, settlement sweep, quote anchoring, durable captures, issues, conflict, supersession, and provenance primitives. | Strongest implemented layer. Add the active-model/issues read path needed by control and correction; do not broaden storage semantics without evidence. |\n+| Elicitation controller | Harness | Reads the engagement brief, active folded model and issues, current runbook, and strategy repertoire; chooses `ask`, `propose`, `contrast`, `validate`, `project`, `explain`, or `stop`. | Absent. Build the narrow controller loop needed to explain and revise one selected region. |\n+| Domain contract | Plugin | Proposal and model schemas; identity, fold, grade, demand, diagnostics, projection, and provenance rules for one target domain. | Designed but unimplemented. Build the CPS subset exercised by the fixture and correction; let it pressure the generic interface. |\n+| Job runbooks | Plugin | Named jobs over the same domain: objectives, entry conditions, trajectories, demand/completion rules, checks, stopping, revision, boundaries, and handoff. | Absent. Implement `review-and-revise`; defer a complete cold-start runbook. |\n+\n+The **engagement brief** is dynamic input, not plugin policy: target document, participant role,\n+objective, scope, known constraints, allowed actions, and time budget for this run. For September it\n+binds a reviewer to an existing target and one revisable region.\n+\n+A separate free-form “next-question ledger” should not become another authority. Most of it is a\n+derived control trace:\n+\n+```text\n+runbook demand -> model gap or issue -> candidate move -> chosen move -> concrete ask\n+```\n+\n+Persist only what replay, audit, or explicit user commitment requires. The controller must be able\n+to explain its chosen move from the runbook and active model; it must not accumulate an independent\n+shadow plan.\n+\n+The September `review-and-revise` runbook is provisionally:\n+\n+```text\n+entry:\n+ existing target + folded requirements model + projected net + reviewer scope\n+trajectory:\n+ orient -> select -> explain provenance -> frame correction\n+ -> ask/validate (3-5 turns) -> show semantic and net delta -> confirm -> hand off\n+done:\n+ scoped demands are met at the declared grade\n+ no open conflict blocks the selected projection\n+ reviewer confirms the intended delta\n+ every changed net element retains provenance\n+boundary:\n+ do not expand into cold-start elicitation or unrelated net repair\n+```\n+\n+## Proof frontiers and execution order\n+\n+The work has four frontiers. They are ordered by learning dependency, not by which ticket is\n+currently unblocked. The semantic and experience lanes start in parallel after Frontier 0, then\n+join as early as possible; they are not two long independent streams to integrate at the end.\n+\n+### Frontier 0 — make the demo claim decidable\n+\n+Confirm the business use case, freeze one representative prebuilt requirements-model/net fixture,\n+and name the optimisation handoff artifact. On that fixture, settle the FE-1480 authority question:\n+which steps are write-time semantic capture, pure model fold, pure SDCPN projection, and document\n+application?\n+\n+**Proof:** one reviewed worked transformation in which every SDCPN element needed by the scenario\n+traces to model fields and captures, with every non-mechanical judgment assigned to a write-time\n+producer. If this cannot be drawn honestly, implementation should not freeze an interface.\n+\n+### Frontier 1 — close the CPS semantic loop\n+\n+Implement only the CPS proposal kinds, model slots, identity/fold rules, demands, projection, and\n+provenance exercised by the fixture and one realistic correction. Carry capture IDs through every\n+derived layer. Make active model issues and selected-region context available to the controller.\n+\n+**Proof:** from the production fold/projection APIs, one source-grounded supersession changes the\n+expected model field and corresponding SDCPN elements, leaves an unrelated region stable, and\n+answers both forward and reverse provenance queries. A YAML or Markdown rendering of the model is\n+enough for inspection at this frontier.\n+\n+### Frontier 2 — close the reviewer control loop\n+\n+Allow a new conversation to bind to an existing target document. Admit the machine client-tool\n+results needed to apply and diagnose a net change. Mount the narrow `review-and-revise` runbook and\n+controller so that the active model and selected region, rather than the raw transcript alone,\n+drive three to five questions.\n+\n+**Proof:** through the real Brunch HTTP handler and Petrinaut panel, a reviewer selects the prepared\n+region, receives a grounded explanation, submits a scoped correction, and sees the returned apply\n+result resume the same durable session. No test-only injection supplies the target or tool wiring.\n+\n+### Frontier 3 — converge on the deployed demo\n+\n+Wire provider/mode routing, browser principal and private session lookup, remote transport,\n+deployment gates, and the optimisation handoff. Rehearse the exact scenario with a clean browser\n+against the deployed demo surface.\n+\n+**Proof:** a screen-recordable run completes the six September beats, survives one reload, exposes\n+the before/after requirements-model delta, and hands the resulting SDCPN to the optimisation flow.\n+Diagnostics show the source capture and projection identities needed to investigate a failure.\n+\n+## What is deliberately cut\n+\n+Until the proof spine is closed:\n+\n+- Do not freeze a broad declarative plugin SDK or require a second hard target. Extract the shared\n+ contract after CPS has stressed it.\n+- Do not make the Gherkin artifact path a prerequisite for the CPS demo.\n+- Do not build a full requirements-graph UI. FE-1481's YAML or Markdown export is the selected\n+ fallback; a UI earns time only if the core loop is already green.\n+- Do not build a complete cold-start CPS interview, general target gallery, every affordance type,\n+ voice input, surprising-scenario generation, or broad telemetry vocabulary.\n+- Do not implement a comprehensive CPS ontology. Support the fixture, the correction, and the\n+ optimisation handoff while keeping the data model honest about what it omits.\n+- Do not bypass provenance or write-time semantics to make a visually convincing net mutation.\n+\n+These are sequencing cuts, not claims that the deferred obligations are unimportant.\n+\n+## Issue projection\n+\n+The PM-authored issues are adopted here as the September delivery decomposition. Linear has not yet\n+been changed; its current unparented state is recorded in COORDINATION until an explicitly approved\n+registry update. The recommended hierarchy is FE-1357 (September planning and plugin design) →\n+FE-1476 (September delivery) → FE-1477 through FE-1482.\n+\n+| Issue | Strategic role | Reconciliation with existing work |\n+| --- | --- | --- |\n+| FE-1476 — prepare the September demo | Outcome owner and acceptance narrative. | Child of FE-1357 while that map remains active; owns rehearsal and handoff rather than implementation details. |\n+| FE-1477 — route Petrinaut AI and Brunch | Experience-lane entry and mode selection. | Product acceptance overlaps FE-1440 (ship the elicitor in the demo site). Keep one implementation owner; do not build two switches. |\n+| FE-1478 — trace a generated net to requirements | Provenance acceptance through registers 3 → 2 → 1 → utterance. | Must shape Frontier 1 from its first model/projection types, not arrive as post-hoc metadata. |\n+| FE-1479 — targeted re-elicitation | Convergence issue for the reviewer loop. | Consumes FE-1438's machine client-tool/application path, FE-1439's session ownership, and the CPS correction path; it does not own a second mutation mechanism. |\n+| FE-1480 — infer requirements model to SDCPN | Authority and projection decision, then the production projector. | Must be reconciled with ADR-0003 before implementation. FE-1438 owns browser application, not hidden semantic projection. |\n+| FE-1481 — expose the requirements model | Inspection fallback and demo delta surface. | Select YAML/Markdown first. Defer FE-1442's broader live capture/completion UI unless the proof spine closes early. |\n+| FE-1482 — add the CPS plugin | Semantic-lane owner and concrete pressure on the plugin boundary. | Pulls the demo-critical slices from FE-1402 (completion), FE-1403 (CPS guidance), FE-1406 (strategies), and FE-1431 (declarative contract). FE-1393 remains the generic/Gherkin path and no longer gates September. |\n+\n+Other consequences for the old graph:\n+\n+- FE-1387 (second target and plugin-contract freeze) follows the CPS proof instead of preceding the\n+ demo.\n+- FE-1331 (start from create-new-net) is outside the current reviewer-against-existing-target\n+ scenario.\n+- FE-1438, FE-1439, FE-1440, FE-1423 (pre-remote gates), and FE-1441 (deployment) remain real\n+ implementation obligations; the new issues state user outcomes rather than replacing these\n+ substrate and release seams.\n+- FE-1402, FE-1403, FE-1406, and FE-1431 should produce only what the CPS runbook and domain\n+ contract consume. Their old standalone completion must not become a hidden prerequisite.\n+\n+## Beliefs, risks, and replan conditions\n+\n+| Current belief | Confidence and evidence | Replan when |\n+| --- | --- | --- |\n+| A bounded review-and-revise scenario can carry the September product claim without cold-start elicitation. | Medium. It is the written FE-1476 scenario, but Dora has not confirmed the use case. | The confirmed use case requires model creation rather than review, or the optimisation handoff requires fields absent from the fixture. |\n+| A concrete CPS implementation will discover a better minimum plugin contract faster than completing the generic design first. | Medium-high. Gherkin deliberately under-stresses the interface; CPS is the first real consumer. | The first worked CPS transformation cannot be expressed without a reusable harness primitive that must precede it. Build that primitive, then return immediately to the vertical proof. |\n+| Register 2 can be rich enough for pure SDCPN projection. | Low-medium. ADR-0003 requires it, but no real fold or projector exists and FE-1480 asserts non-determinism. | The worked transformation identifies an unavoidable semantic choice not represented in captures/model. Record it earlier or explicitly revisit the ADR. |\n+| Three to five turns can produce a meaningful scoped correction. | Low. No CPS runbook has been rehearsed. | Two rehearsals exceed the budget or require unrelated context. Narrow the region, preload explicit context, or revise the demo claim rather than script fake success. |\n+| The proven ask suspension can extend to document-application client tools. | Medium-low. The suspension spike succeeded, but the production transport intentionally refuses machine tool-result follow-ups. | The first tool round-trip cannot preserve correlation, durability, or non-user evidence semantics. Treat this as a critical integration blocker, not a UI detail. |\n+| The production website and remote server can be joined inside the timebox. | Medium-low. Local host seams exist; provider routing, session ownership, deployment, and release gates do not yet converge. | A deployable path is not proved by the end of Frontier 2. Preserve the real semantic loop and seek an explicit demo-surface decision rather than quietly falling back to test-only wiring. |\n+| Requirements-model UI is unnecessary for comprehension. | Medium. The reviewer needs inspectability, but FE-1481 explicitly permits export. | Rehearsal shows that provenance and delta cannot be understood from chat plus a structured export. |\n+\n+## Current choice\n+\n+Stop treating “unblocked” as “next.” The next strategic move is to run Frontier 0 immediately and\n+open Frontiers 1 and 2 in parallel: one worked CPS semantic slice and one existing-target reviewer\n+session/tool-return slice. Join them at the earliest correction, then drive the same bones through\n+provider routing and deployment. The generic Gherkin/plugin-freeze path and broad UI work wait for\n+that join.\n+\n+Revisit this choice as soon as Dora confirms the use case, the FE-1480 worked transformation lands,\n+or either parallel frontier fails its first proof. A steering pass that only updates ticket status\n+does not change this document; a new fact that changes the objective, proof spine, authority\n+boundary, or cut line does.\n*** Update File: /Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/INDEX.md\n@@\n | Document | Status | Linear | Digest |\n | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |\n | [COORDINATION](planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md) | active | cross-project; maintained by arc-close | Current sequencing recommendation, soft cross-map edges, unresolved seams, and exceptional roots; hard blockers, state, and hierarchy remain in Linear |\n | [hash-monorepo-import-plan](planning/_shared/hash-monorepo-import-plan.md) | active until FE-1437 lands | FE-1437 | Native HASH assimilation plan: preserved history and child package workspaces under one Brunch context root, explicit authority cutover, exhaustive repository-material disposition, toolchain port, boundary gates, and verification |\n | [SPEC-LEDGER](planning/_shared/SPEC-LEDGER.md) | active until milestone-one closure | FE-1383 | Obligation-level status and evidence ledger for the elicitation-kernel specification; settles when the milestone closes |\n+| [STEERING](planning/_shared/STEERING.md) | active | FE-1357 / FE-1476 | Current objective-driven strategy for the September CPS review-and-revise proof: evidence, architectural pressure, proof frontiers, cuts, issue projection, risks, and replan conditions |\n | [flue-architecture-cheatsheet](planning/_shared/flue-architecture-cheatsheet.md) | active | commented on FE-1383; feeds docs/agents/flue-routing.md | Architect's consolidation of all 21 Flue guide pages: direct structured generation uses `harness.prompt`; model-delegated work uses `useSubagent`; three-lane boundary summary and ranked divergence risks; reconciled against installed Flue 2.0.3 source |\n | [topology](planning/_shared/topology.md) | active | ratified → ADR-0002; N1 discharged by FE-1422 + FE-1392; local N5 implemented by FE-1391; N3 amended by FE-1437 | Pseudo-style verification of the package/app tree against the three-lane model and spec §12.2: portable ask/sweep protocols, Flue binding wiring, package boundaries, and application-only Brunch–Petrinaut composition |\n*** Update File: /Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md\n@@\n-This is the cross-map coordination surface for the `brunch-agent` project. FE-1383 owns the\n-milestone-one harness build; FE-1357 owns the September demo and process-model plugin design.\n-Linear is canonical for issue state, parentage, and hard `blocks` relations. This file owns\n-only the judgment Linear cannot express: the current project-wide recommendation, soft edges,\n-unresolved seams, and exceptional roots.\n+This is the cross-map coordination surface for the `brunch-agent` project. FE-1383 owns the\n+milestone-one harness build; FE-1357 owns the September demo and process-model plugin design.\n+Linear is canonical for issue state, parentage, and hard `blocks` relations. The\n+[steering model](./STEERING.md) chooses the current objective, proof frontiers, and cuts under\n+pressure. This file projects that strategy onto mechanically available work: the current\n+project-wide recommendation, soft edges, unresolved seams, and exceptional roots.\n@@\n ## Current sequencing recommendation\n \n-As of **2026-08-21**, the FE-1437 authority cutover has been executed: the full brunch-lite\n-history is imported on `ln/fe-1437-hash-monorepo-import` in `hashintel/hash` (frozen standalone\n-SHA `43a0022918861846344b96a32cb94f92e2ee96ae`), every import gate re-verified. `hashintel/hash`\n-is authoritative; the standalone repository accepts no further implementation work. FE-1437\n-closes when the branch lands on `main` (squash merge, per convention). Part of FE-1440's website\n-wiring (the Brunch interactive-tool panel in `apps/petrinaut-website`) travelled with the import\n-branch; FE-1440 was trimmed on 2026-08-21 to the remaining mode wiring (mode switch, browser\n-identifier bootstrap, remote transport swap). After landing, advance FE-1438 (client-tool round-trip)\n-beside FE-1393 (plugin SDK and first projection); FE-1439 (private durable sessions) proceeds in\n-parallel. The integration stream joins at FE-1440 and deployment follows at FE-1441 (which also\n-waits on FE-1423's pre-exposure gates), while the harness stream reaches its contract-freeze\n-decision at FE-1387. FE-1402/FE-1403 form a parallel content/evaluation stream, without\n-displacing the two convergence edges.\n+As of **2026-08-24**, FE-1476 (the September demo delivery) changes the recommendation from generic\n+package completion to a concrete CPS review-and-revise proof. After FE-1437 (the monorepo import)\n+lands, open two fronts in parallel. The semantic front starts FE-1482 (the CPS plugin) against one\n+worked fixture and settles FE-1480's requirements-model-to-SDCPN authority boundary before it\n+implements a projector; FE-1478 (net-to-requirements provenance) is part of that spine from its\n+first types. The experience front advances FE-1438 (machine client-tool round-trip) and FE-1439\n+(private sessions) far enough for a new reviewer conversation to target an existing document,\n+while FE-1477/FE-1440 share one provider-routing implementation. Join the fronts at FE-1479\n+(targeted re-elicitation), then drive the same path through FE-1423's pre-exposure gates and\n+FE-1441 deployment.\n+\n+FE-1393's generic Gherkin artifact and FE-1387's second-target contract freeze no longer gate the\n+September proof. FE-1402, FE-1403, FE-1406, and FE-1431 supply only the completion, guidance,\n+strategy, and contract slices the CPS `review-and-revise` runbook consumes. FE-1481 selects\n+YAML/Markdown export as the requirements-model inspection floor; broad UI follows only if the\n+closed loop is already proved.\n@@\n nodes:\n FE-1437 [executed, landing] # history imported; HASH authoritative; PR pending\n- FE-1438 [next] # client-tool round-trip\n- FE-1439 [next, parallel] # private durable sessions\n- FE-1440 [join, partly landed] # website elicitor mode; panel wiring on import branch\n- FE-1441 [post-landing] # HASH deployment\n- FE-1393 [next] # plugin SDK + first projection\n- FE-1387 [after-FE-1393] # second pack + contract freeze\n- FE-1395 [coordination] # full affordance set\n- FE-1402 [parallel, content] # completion contract\n- FE-1403 [parallel, content] # interviewing guidance\n- FE-1404 [after-content] # armed baseline\n+ FE-1476 [objective] # September reviewer demo\n+ FE-1482 [next, semantic] # concrete CPS plugin + review/revise runbook\n+ FE-1480 [decision, semantic] # model/projection authority, then projector\n+ FE-1478 [semantic proof] # provenance through all three registers\n+ FE-1438 [next, experience] # machine client-tool round-trip + application\n+ FE-1439 [next, experience] # existing-target reviewer session ownership\n+ FE-1477/FE-1440 [experience] # one provider-routing implementation\n+ FE-1479 [join] # targeted correction changes the live net\n+ FE-1481 [fallback] # structured model export before UI\n+ FE-1441 [deployed proof] # HASH deployment\n \n edges:\n FE-1449 -[hard]-> FE-1438\n- FE-1392 -[hard]-> FE-1393\n FE-1438, FE-1439,\n FE-1437 -[hard]-> FE-1440\n FE-1437, FE-1439,\n FE-1423 -[hard]-> FE-1441\n- FE-1393 -[hard]-> FE-1387\n- FE-1402, FE-1403 -[hard]-> FE-1404\n- FE-1395 -[coord]-> FE-1438\n FE-1437 branch on main -[state-gate]-> FE-1438, FE-1439, FE-1393\n- FE-1387 -[input]-> FE-1440\n+ FE-1480 decision -[input]-> FE-1482, FE-1478\n+ FE-1402, FE-1403,\n+ FE-1406, FE-1431 -[input]-> FE-1482\n+ FE-1482, FE-1478,\n+ FE-1438, FE-1439 -[input]-> FE-1479\n+ FE-1479, FE-1440 -[input]-> FE-1441\n ```\n@@\n ## Open seams\n \n-- **Contract freeze — FE-1387.** The process-model target must stress the plugin contract before\n- it freezes. FE-1393 makes the contract programmable; FE-1387 remains the cross-map hinge.\n+- **Projection authority — FE-1480.** The ticket assumes non-deterministic LLM inference from the\n+ requirements model to SDCPN, while ADR-0003 requires write-time-only semantic inference and a\n+ pure projection. A worked CPS transformation must assign every judgment to capture, fold,\n+ projection, or document application before the interface freezes.\n+- **Controller and runbook.** The harness does not read the folded model or open issues back into\n+ the agent, and no plugin defines a job trajectory or stopping rule. FE-1482 must exercise the\n+ narrow `review-and-revise` loop; FE-1406 and FE-1402/FE-1403 are inputs, not parallel products.\n+- **Reviewer target identity — FE-1439 × FE-1479.** The current host derives target-document\n+ identity from conversation identity. September requires a new reviewer conversation against an\n+ existing target without weakening owner isolation.\n+- **Contract freeze — FE-1387.** The CPS target must stress the plugin contract before it freezes.\n+ The freeze follows the September semantic proof rather than gating it.\n@@\n ## Exceptional roots\n@@\n - **FE-1406 — design reusable elicitation strategies.** The cross-map home for the\n harness-shipped generic strategy quiver; intentionally independent of either delivery map.\n+- **FE-1472 — evaluate the nested Anthropic SDK pin.** Unrelated triage root; no owning delivery\n+ map has been chosen.\n+- **FE-1476 — prepare the September demo.** Temporary delivery root pending the recommended fold\n+ under FE-1357.\n+- **FE-1477 through FE-1482 — September outcome slices.** PM-authored issues adopted by the\n+ steering model but not yet folded in Linear. The recommended parent is FE-1476; overlaps and\n+ ownership boundaries are recorded in STEERING's issue projection before external mutation.\n*** End Patch" -} -``` - -## User - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CebqF6NebEylhcnTlux` - -``` -{ - "files": [ - { - "uri": "file:///Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/%40hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md", - "diff": "Index: /Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md\n===================================================================\n--- /Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md\n+++ /Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md\n@@ -0,0 +1,278 @@\n+# Brunch steering model\n+\n+This is the current strategic understanding of Brunch: what outcome matters now, what the system\n+can actually do, which beliefs remain weak, and where to spend the next unit of time. Its immediate\n+decision horizon is the September demo, but it steers the whole context rather than one package or\n+one Linear map.\n+\n+This is not a roadmap, a specification, or an issue mirror. Specifications and accepted ADRs define\n+obligations and settled architecture. Linear is canonical for issue state, hierarchy, and hard\n+blockers. [COORDINATION](./COORDINATION.md) projects this strategy onto the mechanically available\n+work. This document owns the judgment between them: which objective to pursue under the current\n+time, evidence, risk, and product pressure; what to defer; and what new evidence would change that\n+choice. It may expose a conflict with a specification or ADR, but cannot silently override one.\n+\n+The document remains live. A steering pass orients from current evidence, chooses a frontier,\n+executes to a named proof, reconciles the result with specifications and issues, then replans only\n+where the evidence changed. Git carries the history; this file carries only the current model. Its\n+shape is intentionally specific to the present effort. Do not extract a generic template or skill\n+until a second real planning cycle shows which parts recur.\n+\n+## The September outcome\n+\n+As of **2026-08-24**, the working constraint is roughly two human weeks. The event date and final\n+business use case are not yet recorded here; Dora's confirmation is a decision gate, not an excuse\n+to leave the technical spine vague.\n+\n+FE-1476 (the September demo delivery) supplies the working scenario:\n+\n+1. A reviewer opens a prebuilt cyber-physical-process requirements model and its generated SDCPN in\n+ Petrinaut.\n+2. The reviewer selects or describes a net element and asks why it was modelled that way.\n+3. Brunch traces the answer through the requirements model and captures to an exact source\n+ utterance.\n+4. The reviewer scopes one correction and conducts three to five focused chat turns.\n+5. New or superseding captures change the elicited model; reprojection changes the corresponding\n+ part of the live net without rebuilding unrelated parts.\n+6. The resulting artifact is handed to the existing optimisation experiment flow.\n+\n+This is a **review-and-revise** demonstration. It does not need to prove that Brunch can elicit an\n+entire CPS model from a blank conversation. It does need to prove a closed semantic and interaction\n+loop. A chat transcript beside a static fixture, an unexplained net mutation, or a test that injects\n+wiring absent from the deployed entrypoint does not satisfy the outcome.\n+\n+The proof spine is therefore:\n+\n+```text\n+source utterance\n+ -> active typed capture\n+ -> folded CPS requirements model\n+ -> SDCPN element + provenance\n+ -> reviewer question and scoped correction\n+ -> superseding capture\n+ -> changed folded model\n+ -> changed live SDCPN\n+ -> optimisation handoff\n+```\n+\n+## Where the system actually stands\n+\n+The package topology is in place and the implemented tracer is real, but the September loop is not\n+an incremental extension of an almost-finished product. Most of the contract-bearing middle is\n+absent.\n+\n+| Surface | Evidence now | September consequence |\n+| --- | --- | --- |\n+| Ask, suspend, return | A user answer to `brunch_ask` survives the AI SDK/Flue boundary and resumes durable history. | Reuse; do not redesign the ask protocol. |\n+| Settlement and capture | A settled range is privately swept into quote-anchored captures and applied atomically. Supersession and active-head validation exist in the store. | Preserve as the evidence foundation, but expose active state to the controller. |\n+| Plugin SDK | The exported `Plugin` is deliberately only identity plus exactly one proposal type. Gherkin captures one verbatim statement. | There is no implemented fold, demand runner, model, projection, or useful hard-target plugin to extend. |\n+| Elicitation control | The agent receives general ask/sweep instructions. Sweep extraction sees a conversation range and proposal names only. No production path reads the active capture set or a derived model back into the interview. | Brunch cannot yet choose a next question from what it has learned or conduct a targeted correction. |\n+| CPS semantics | The three-register design and provisional two-schema/two-table plugin contract are desk-designed. No `plugin-cps` exists. | The critical semantic path must be built against a concrete CPS case, not inferred from Gherkin completeness. |\n+| Correction | The store can represent supersession, but extraction cannot see active capture IDs, model issues, or the target region; Gherkin cannot propose a supersession. | Targeted re-elicitation is structurally unreachable despite the storage mechanics being present. |\n+| Petrinaut transport | Local panel streaming and human ask-return work. Machine client-tool-result follow-ups are explicitly refused pending FE-1438 (the client-tool round-trip). | The agent cannot yet apply a projection to the live document and receive the result. |\n+| Session target | The current application derives `targetDocumentId` from `conversationId`. | A new reviewer session cannot address a pre-existing elicitation target without changing this identity boundary. |\n+| Demo website | The production website still uses its stock assistant route. The `/brunch` Actual Mode is a separate read-only fixture/SSE surface. | Local tracer proof must not be mistaken for deployed integration. |\n+\n+The decisive reading is that the current design is not too rigorous in its preservation of\n+evidence, correction, or register boundaries. It is too broad and too generic for the remaining\n+time. Completing generic plugin machinery, a second target, a full CPS ontology, and a cold-start\n+interviewer before crossing the real reviewer loop would optimize the library while leaving the\n+demo hollow.\n+\n+## The strategic bet\n+\n+Build the smallest honest **CPS review-and-revise loop** through all three registers and the real\n+Petrinaut entrypoint. Let that concrete implementation discover the minimum plugin interface, then\n+generalize only what the CPS case and existing Gherkin case both need.\n+\n+This is not permission to take another thin tracer as the definition of done. The vertical proof is\n+contract-bearing: it includes model assembly, provenance, targeted correction, reprojection,\n+application, and the deployed route. Breadth inside each layer may be narrow; no layer in that loop\n+may be a fixture masquerading as production wiring.\n+\n+The bet preserves these load-bearing decisions:\n+\n+- Captures remain the durable, source-grounded assertion register.\n+- Every semantic inference happens at write time and is recorded as a contestable capture.\n+- The elicited model is a pure fold over active captures and every model part names its supporting\n+ capture IDs.\n+- SDCPN projection consumes the elicited model without rereading the transcript or making hidden\n+ semantic judgments.\n+- Petrinaut application and diagnostics are separate from semantic projection: the application may\n+ use client tools to apply a projected artifact, but it does not become the authority that invents\n+ the model.\n+- A correction supersedes or adds assertions and re-runs the fold and projection; it does not patch\n+ an unexplained net element directly.\n+\n+FE-1480 (requirements-model-to-SDCPN inference) challenges the third and fourth decisions by\n+assuming the projection itself requires LLM inference. That assumption is unresolved. If a worked\n+CPS case proves that the register-2 model is insufficient for pure projection, the honest choices\n+are to record the missing semantic judgment as a capture before folding or to amend ADR-0003 (the\n+three-register IR) explicitly. Hiding inference inside a read-time projection is not an available\n+shortcut.\n+\n+## The elicitor architecture under this load\n+\n+The discussion began with four parts; the current model has five responsibilities across the\n+harness and plugin layers, plus one per-engagement input. The missing responsibility is the\n+controller that closes the loop between captured evidence and the next move.\n+\n+| Responsibility | Owner | What it contains | State and September obligation |\n+| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n+| Strategy repertoire | Harness | Orientations, motivations, conversational licences, interviewing techniques, and question-formulation guidance. | Partly researched, not operationally selected. Implement only the techniques used by the review-and-revise runbook. |\n+| Evidence engine | Harness | Archive, settlement sweep, quote anchoring, durable captures, issues, conflict, supersession, and provenance primitives. | Strongest implemented layer. Add the active-model/issues read path needed by control and correction; do not broaden storage semantics without evidence. |\n+| Elicitation controller | Harness | Reads the engagement brief, active folded model and issues, current runbook, and strategy repertoire; chooses `ask`, `propose`, `contrast`, `validate`, `project`, `explain`, or `stop`. | Absent. Build the narrow controller loop needed to explain and revise one selected region. |\n+| Domain contract | Plugin | Proposal and model schemas; identity, fold, grade, demand, diagnostics, projection, and provenance rules for one target domain. | Designed but unimplemented. Build the CPS subset exercised by the fixture and correction; let it pressure the generic interface. |\n+| Job runbooks | Plugin | Named jobs over the same domain: objectives, entry conditions, trajectories, demand/completion rules, checks, stopping, revision, boundaries, and handoff. | Absent. Implement `review-and-revise`; defer a complete cold-start runbook. |\n+\n+The **engagement brief** is dynamic input, not plugin policy: target document, participant role,\n+objective, scope, known constraints, allowed actions, and time budget for this run. For September it\n+binds a reviewer to an existing target and one revisable region.\n+\n+A separate free-form “next-question ledger” should not become another authority. Most of it is a\n+derived control trace:\n+\n+```text\n+runbook demand -> model gap or issue -> candidate move -> chosen move -> concrete ask\n+```\n+\n+Persist only what replay, audit, or explicit user commitment requires. The controller must be able\n+to explain its chosen move from the runbook and active model; it must not accumulate an independent\n+shadow plan.\n+\n+The September `review-and-revise` runbook is provisionally:\n+\n+```text\n+entry:\n+ existing target + folded requirements model + projected net + reviewer scope\n+trajectory:\n+ orient -> select -> explain provenance -> frame correction\n+ -> ask/validate (3-5 turns) -> show semantic and net delta -> confirm -> hand off\n+done:\n+ scoped demands are met at the declared grade\n+ no open conflict blocks the selected projection\n+ reviewer confirms the intended delta\n+ every changed net element retains provenance\n+boundary:\n+ do not expand into cold-start elicitation or unrelated net repair\n+```\n+\n+## Proof frontiers and execution order\n+\n+The work has four frontiers. They are ordered by learning dependency, not by which ticket is\n+currently unblocked. The semantic and experience lanes start in parallel after Frontier 0, then\n+join as early as possible; they are not two long independent streams to integrate at the end.\n+\n+### Frontier 0 — make the demo claim decidable\n+\n+Confirm the business use case, freeze one representative prebuilt requirements-model/net fixture,\n+and name the optimisation handoff artifact. On that fixture, settle the FE-1480 authority question:\n+which steps are write-time semantic capture, pure model fold, pure SDCPN projection, and document\n+application?\n+\n+**Proof:** one reviewed worked transformation in which every SDCPN element needed by the scenario\n+traces to model fields and captures, with every non-mechanical judgment assigned to a write-time\n+producer. If this cannot be drawn honestly, implementation should not freeze an interface.\n+\n+### Frontier 1 — close the CPS semantic loop\n+\n+Implement only the CPS proposal kinds, model slots, identity/fold rules, demands, projection, and\n+provenance exercised by the fixture and one realistic correction. Carry capture IDs through every\n+derived layer. Make active model issues and selected-region context available to the controller.\n+\n+**Proof:** from the production fold/projection APIs, one source-grounded supersession changes the\n+expected model field and corresponding SDCPN elements, leaves an unrelated region stable, and\n+answers both forward and reverse provenance queries. A YAML or Markdown rendering of the model is\n+enough for inspection at this frontier.\n+\n+### Frontier 2 — close the reviewer control loop\n+\n+Allow a new conversation to bind to an existing target document. Admit the machine client-tool\n+results needed to apply and diagnose a net change. Mount the narrow `review-and-revise` runbook and\n+controller so that the active model and selected region, rather than the raw transcript alone,\n+drive three to five questions.\n+\n+**Proof:** through the real Brunch HTTP handler and Petrinaut panel, a reviewer selects the prepared\n+region, receives a grounded explanation, submits a scoped correction, and sees the returned apply\n+result resume the same durable session. No test-only injection supplies the target or tool wiring.\n+\n+### Frontier 3 — converge on the deployed demo\n+\n+Wire provider/mode routing, browser principal and private session lookup, remote transport,\n+deployment gates, and the optimisation handoff. Rehearse the exact scenario with a clean browser\n+against the deployed demo surface.\n+\n+**Proof:** a screen-recordable run completes the six September beats, survives one reload, exposes\n+the before/after requirements-model delta, and hands the resulting SDCPN to the optimisation flow.\n+Diagnostics show the source capture and projection identities needed to investigate a failure.\n+\n+## What is deliberately cut\n+\n+Until the proof spine is closed:\n+\n+- Do not freeze a broad declarative plugin SDK or require a second hard target. Extract the shared\n+ contract after CPS has stressed it.\n+- Do not make the Gherkin artifact path a prerequisite for the CPS demo.\n+- Do not build a full requirements-graph UI. FE-1481's YAML or Markdown export is the selected\n+ fallback; a UI earns time only if the core loop is already green.\n+- Do not build a complete cold-start CPS interview, general target gallery, every affordance type,\n+ voice input, surprising-scenario generation, or broad telemetry vocabulary.\n+- Do not implement a comprehensive CPS ontology. Support the fixture, the correction, and the\n+ optimisation handoff while keeping the data model honest about what it omits.\n+- Do not bypass provenance or write-time semantics to make a visually convincing net mutation.\n+\n+These are sequencing cuts, not claims that the deferred obligations are unimportant.\n+\n+## Issue projection\n+\n+The PM-authored issues are adopted here as the September delivery decomposition. Linear has not yet\n+been changed; its current unparented state is recorded in COORDINATION until an explicitly approved\n+registry update. The recommended hierarchy is FE-1357 (September planning and plugin design) →\n+FE-1476 (September delivery) → FE-1477 through FE-1482.\n+\n+| Issue | Strategic role | Reconciliation with existing work |\n+| --- | --- | --- |\n+| FE-1476 — prepare the September demo | Outcome owner and acceptance narrative. | Child of FE-1357 while that map remains active; owns rehearsal and handoff rather than implementation details. |\n+| FE-1477 — route Petrinaut AI and Brunch | Experience-lane entry and mode selection. | Product acceptance overlaps FE-1440 (ship the elicitor in the demo site). Keep one implementation owner; do not build two switches. |\n+| FE-1478 — trace a generated net to requirements | Provenance acceptance through registers 3 → 2 → 1 → utterance. | Must shape Frontier 1 from its first model/projection types, not arrive as post-hoc metadata. |\n+| FE-1479 — targeted re-elicitation | Convergence issue for the reviewer loop. | Consumes FE-1438's machine client-tool/application path, FE-1439's session ownership, and the CPS correction path; it does not own a second mutation mechanism. |\n+| FE-1480 — infer requirements model to SDCPN | Authority and projection decision, then the production projector. | Must be reconciled with ADR-0003 before implementation. FE-1438 owns browser application, not hidden semantic projection. |\n+| FE-1481 — expose the requirements model | Inspection fallback and demo delta surface. | Select YAML/Markdown first. Defer FE-1442's broader live capture/completion UI unless the proof spine closes early. |\n+| FE-1482 — add the CPS plugin | Semantic-lane owner and concrete pressure on the plugin boundary. | Pulls the demo-critical slices from FE-1402 (completion), FE-1403 (CPS guidance), FE-1406 (strategies), and FE-1431 (declarative contract). FE-1393 remains the generic/Gherkin path and no longer gates September. |\n+\n+Other consequences for the old graph:\n+\n+- FE-1387 (second target and plugin-contract freeze) follows the CPS proof instead of preceding the\n+ demo.\n+- FE-1331 (start from create-new-net) is outside the current reviewer-against-existing-target\n+ scenario.\n+- FE-1438, FE-1439, FE-1440, FE-1423 (pre-remote gates), and FE-1441 (deployment) remain real\n+ implementation obligations; the new issues state user outcomes rather than replacing these\n+ substrate and release seams.\n+- FE-1402, FE-1403, FE-1406, and FE-1431 should produce only what the CPS runbook and domain\n+ contract consume. Their old standalone completion must not become a hidden prerequisite.\n+\n+## Beliefs, risks, and replan conditions\n+\n+| Current belief | Confidence and evidence | Replan when |\n+| --- | --- | --- |\n+| A bounded review-and-revise scenario can carry the September product claim without cold-start elicitation. | Medium. It is the written FE-1476 scenario, but Dora has not confirmed the use case. | The confirmed use case requires model creation rather than review, or the optimisation handoff requires fields absent from the fixture. |\n+| A concrete CPS implementation will discover a better minimum plugin contract faster than completing the generic design first. | Medium-high. Gherkin deliberately under-stresses the interface; CPS is the first real consumer. | The first worked CPS transformation cannot be expressed without a reusable harness primitive that must precede it. Build that primitive, then return immediately to the vertical proof. |\n+| Register 2 can be rich enough for pure SDCPN projection. | Low-medium. ADR-0003 requires it, but no real fold or projector exists and FE-1480 asserts non-determinism. | The worked transformation identifies an unavoidable semantic choice not represented in captures/model. Record it earlier or explicitly revisit the ADR. |\n+| Three to five turns can produce a meaningful scoped correction. | Low. No CPS runbook has been rehearsed. | Two rehearsals exceed the budget or require unrelated context. Narrow the region, preload explicit context, or revise the demo claim rather than script fake success. |\n+| The proven ask suspension can extend to document-application client tools. | Medium-low. The suspension spike succeeded, but the production transport intentionally refuses machine tool-result follow-ups. | The first tool round-trip cannot preserve correlation, durability, or non-user evidence semantics. Treat this as a critical integration blocker, not a UI detail. |\n+| The production website and remote server can be joined inside the timebox. | Medium-low. Local host seams exist; provider routing, session ownership, deployment, and release gates do not yet converge. | A deployable path is not proved by the end of Frontier 2. Preserve the real semantic loop and seek an explicit demo-surface decision rather than quietly falling back to test-only wiring. |\n+| Requirements-model UI is unnecessary for comprehension. | Medium. The reviewer needs inspectability, but FE-1481 explicitly permits export. | Rehearsal shows that provenance and delta cannot be understood from chat plus a structured export. |\n+\n+## Current choice\n+\n+Stop treating “unblocked” as “next.” The next strategic move is to run Frontier 0 immediately and\n+open Frontiers 1 and 2 in parallel: one worked CPS semantic slice and one existing-target reviewer\n+session/tool-return slice. Join them at the earliest correction, then drive the same bones through\n+provider routing and deployment. The generic Gherkin/plugin-freeze path and broad UI work wait for\n+that join.\n+\n+Revisit this choice as soon as Dora confirms the use case, the FE-1480 worked transformation lands,\n+or either parallel frontier fails its first proof. A steering pass that only updates ticket status\n+does not change this document; a new fact that changes the objective, proof spine, authority\n+boundary, or cut line does.\n", - "type": "add", - "additions": 278, - "deletions": 0 - }, - { - "uri": "file:///Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/%40hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/INDEX.md", - "diff": "Index: /Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/INDEX.md\n===================================================================\n--- /Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/INDEX.md\n+++ /Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/INDEX.md\n@@ -70,8 +70,9 @@\n | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |\n | [COORDINATION](planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md) | active | cross-project; maintained by arc-close | Current sequencing recommendation, soft cross-map edges, unresolved seams, and exceptional roots; hard blockers, state, and hierarchy remain in Linear |\n | [hash-monorepo-import-plan](planning/_shared/hash-monorepo-import-plan.md) | active until FE-1437 lands | FE-1437 | Native HASH assimilation plan: preserved history and child package workspaces under one Brunch context root, explicit authority cutover, exhaustive repository-material disposition, toolchain port, boundary gates, and verification |\n | [SPEC-LEDGER](planning/_shared/SPEC-LEDGER.md) | active until milestone-one closure | FE-1383 | Obligation-level status and evidence ledger for the elicitation-kernel specification; settles when the milestone closes |\n+| [STEERING](planning/_shared/STEERING.md) | active | FE-1357 / FE-1476 | Current objective-driven strategy for the September CPS review-and-revise proof: evidence, architectural pressure, proof frontiers, cuts, issue projection, risks, and replan conditions |\n | [flue-architecture-cheatsheet](planning/_shared/flue-architecture-cheatsheet.md) | active | commented on FE-1383; feeds docs/agents/flue-routing.md | Architect's consolidation of all 21 Flue guide pages: direct structured generation uses `harness.prompt`; model-delegated work uses `useSubagent`; three-lane boundary summary and ranked divergence risks; reconciled against installed Flue 2.0.3 source |\n | [topology](planning/_shared/topology.md) | active | ratified → ADR-0002; N1 discharged by FE-1422 + FE-1392; local N5 implemented by FE-1391; N3 amended by FE-1437 | Pseudo-style verification of the package/app tree against the three-lane model and spec §12.2: portable ask/sweep protocols, Flue binding wiring, package boundaries, and application-only Brunch–Petrinaut composition |\n \n ## planning/legibility-sweep (FE-1401 arc records)\n", - "type": "update", - "additions": 1, - "deletions": 0 - }, - { - "uri": "file:///Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/%40hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md", - "diff": "Index: /Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md\n===================================================================\n--- /Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md\n+++ /Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md\n@@ -1,33 +1,37 @@\n # Project coordination\n \n This is the cross-map coordination surface for the `brunch-agent` project. FE-1383 owns the\n milestone-one harness build; FE-1357 owns the September demo and process-model plugin design.\n-Linear is canonical for issue state, parentage, and hard `blocks` relations. This file owns\n-only the judgment Linear cannot express: the current project-wide recommendation, soft edges,\n-unresolved seams, and exceptional roots.\n+Linear is canonical for issue state, parentage, and hard `blocks` relations. The\n+[steering model](./STEERING.md) chooses the current objective, proof frontiers, and cuts under\n+pressure. This file projects that strategy onto mechanically available work: the current\n+project-wide recommendation, soft edges, unresolved seams, and exceptional roots.\n \n Before revising the recommendation, run\n `turbo run linear:graph --filter '@hashintel/brunch-agent'`. Its compact projection supplies the\n factual open-issue DAG; read the relevant issue bodies for semantic content, then infer the smallest\n honest recommendation. Do not paste the generated graph here or mirror issue status.\n \n ## Current sequencing recommendation\n \n-As of **2026-08-21**, the FE-1437 authority cutover has been executed: the full brunch-lite\n-history is imported on `ln/fe-1437-hash-monorepo-import` in `hashintel/hash` (frozen standalone\n-SHA `43a0022918861846344b96a32cb94f92e2ee96ae`), every import gate re-verified. `hashintel/hash`\n-is authoritative; the standalone repository accepts no further implementation work. FE-1437\n-closes when the branch lands on `main` (squash merge, per convention). Part of FE-1440's website\n-wiring (the Brunch interactive-tool panel in `apps/petrinaut-website`) travelled with the import\n-branch; FE-1440 was trimmed on 2026-08-21 to the remaining mode wiring (mode switch, browser\n-identifier bootstrap, remote transport swap). After landing, advance FE-1438 (client-tool round-trip)\n-beside FE-1393 (plugin SDK and first projection); FE-1439 (private durable sessions) proceeds in\n-parallel. The integration stream joins at FE-1440 and deployment follows at FE-1441 (which also\n-waits on FE-1423's pre-exposure gates), while the harness stream reaches its contract-freeze\n-decision at FE-1387. FE-1402/FE-1403 form a parallel content/evaluation stream, without\n-displacing the two convergence edges.\n+As of **2026-08-24**, FE-1476 (the September demo delivery) changes the recommendation from generic\n+package completion to a concrete CPS review-and-revise proof. After FE-1437 (the monorepo import)\n+lands, open two fronts in parallel. The semantic front starts FE-1482 (the CPS plugin) against one\n+worked fixture and settles FE-1480's requirements-model-to-SDCPN authority boundary before it\n+implements a projector; FE-1478 (net-to-requirements provenance) is part of that spine from its\n+first types. The experience front advances FE-1438 (machine client-tool round-trip) and FE-1439\n+(private sessions) far enough for a new reviewer conversation to target an existing document,\n+while FE-1477/FE-1440 share one provider-routing implementation. Join the fronts at FE-1479\n+(targeted re-elicitation), then drive the same path through FE-1423's pre-exposure gates and\n+FE-1441 deployment.\n \n+FE-1393's generic Gherkin artifact and FE-1387's second-target contract freeze no longer gate the\n+September proof. FE-1402, FE-1403, FE-1406, and FE-1431 supply only the completion, guidance,\n+strategy, and contract slices the CPS `review-and-revise` runbook consumes. FE-1481 selects\n+YAML/Markdown export as the requirements-model inspection floor; broad UI follows only if the\n+closed loop is already proved.\n+\n ```text\n legend:\n -[hard]-> native Linear blocker\n -[coord]-> either order; do not implement concurrently\n@@ -35,31 +39,32 @@\n -[state-gate]-> condition in the world, not an issue edge\n \n nodes:\n FE-1437 [executed, landing] # history imported; HASH authoritative; PR pending\n- FE-1438 [next] # client-tool round-trip\n- FE-1439 [next, parallel] # private durable sessions\n- FE-1440 [join, partly landed] # website elicitor mode; panel wiring on import branch\n- FE-1441 [post-landing] # HASH deployment\n- FE-1393 [next] # plugin SDK + first projection\n- FE-1387 [after-FE-1393] # second pack + contract freeze\n- FE-1395 [coordination] # full affordance set\n- FE-1402 [parallel, content] # completion contract\n- FE-1403 [parallel, content] # interviewing guidance\n- FE-1404 [after-content] # armed baseline\n+ FE-1476 [objective] # September reviewer demo\n+ FE-1482 [next, semantic] # concrete CPS plugin + review/revise runbook\n+ FE-1480 [decision, semantic] # model/projection authority, then projector\n+ FE-1478 [semantic proof] # provenance through all three registers\n+ FE-1438 [next, experience] # machine client-tool round-trip + application\n+ FE-1439 [next, experience] # existing-target reviewer session ownership\n+ FE-1477/FE-1440 [experience] # one provider-routing implementation\n+ FE-1479 [join] # targeted correction changes the live net\n+ FE-1481 [fallback] # structured model export before UI\n+ FE-1441 [deployed proof] # HASH deployment\n \n edges:\n FE-1449 -[hard]-> FE-1438\n- FE-1392 -[hard]-> FE-1393\n FE-1438, FE-1439,\n FE-1437 -[hard]-> FE-1440\n FE-1437, FE-1439,\n FE-1423 -[hard]-> FE-1441\n- FE-1393 -[hard]-> FE-1387\n- FE-1402, FE-1403 -[hard]-> FE-1404\n- FE-1395 -[coord]-> FE-1438\n FE-1437 branch on main -[state-gate]-> FE-1438, FE-1439, FE-1393\n- FE-1387 -[input]-> FE-1440\n+ FE-1480 decision -[input]-> FE-1482, FE-1478\n+ FE-1402, FE-1403,\n+ FE-1406, FE-1431 -[input]-> FE-1482\n+ FE-1482, FE-1478,\n+ FE-1438, FE-1439 -[input]-> FE-1479\n+ FE-1479, FE-1440 -[input]-> FE-1441\n ```\n \n Hard-edge truth remains in Linear. The graph above is a deliberately focused recommendation,\n not a second issue database.\n@@ -89,10 +94,20 @@\n explicit approval from Lu.\n \n ## Open seams\n \n-- **Contract freeze — FE-1387.** The process-model target must stress the plugin contract before\n- it freezes. FE-1393 makes the contract programmable; FE-1387 remains the cross-map hinge.\n+- **Projection authority — FE-1480.** The ticket assumes non-deterministic LLM inference from the\n+ requirements model to SDCPN, while ADR-0003 requires write-time-only semantic inference and a\n+ pure projection. A worked CPS transformation must assign every judgment to capture, fold,\n+ projection, or document application before the interface freezes.\n+- **Controller and runbook.** The harness does not read the folded model or open issues back into\n+ the agent, and no plugin defines a job trajectory or stopping rule. FE-1482 must exercise the\n+ narrow `review-and-revise` loop; FE-1406 and FE-1402/FE-1403 are inputs, not parallel products.\n+- **Reviewer target identity — FE-1439 × FE-1479.** The current host derives target-document\n+ identity from conversation identity. September requires a new reviewer conversation against an\n+ existing target without weakening owner isolation.\n+- **Contract freeze — FE-1387.** The CPS target must stress the plugin contract before it freezes.\n+ The freeze follows the September semantic proof rather than gating it.\n - **Absence locator.** An absence capture carries no payload, but the fold needs a field-specific\n coordinate (anchor × slot). The plugin-contract spec records three worked cases; any envelope\n amendment belongs to the harness side of this seam.\n - **Structured-tap evidence — FE-1395 × capture store.** `resolve-conflict` currently rejects\n@@ -119,4 +134,11 @@\n - **FE-1334 — offer the user a surprising scenario of their model.** A validation gesture with\n no owning map yet; closest to the motif/quiver strategy work.\n - **FE-1406 — design reusable elicitation strategies.** The cross-map home for the\n harness-shipped generic strategy quiver; intentionally independent of either delivery map.\n+- **FE-1472 — evaluate the nested Anthropic SDK pin.** Unrelated triage root; no owning delivery\n+ map has been chosen.\n+- **FE-1476 — prepare the September demo.** Temporary delivery root pending the recommended fold\n+ under FE-1357.\n+- **FE-1477 through FE-1482 — September outcome slices.** PM-authored issues adopted by the\n+ steering model but not yet folded in Linear. The recommended parent is FE-1476; overlaps and\n+ ownership boundaries are recorded in STEERING's issue projection before external mutation.\n", - "type": "update", - "additions": 55, - "deletions": 33 - } - ], - "summary": "add: /Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md (+278/-0)\nupdate: /Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/INDEX.md (+1/-0)\nupdate: /Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md (+55/-33)" -} -``` - -## Assistant - -The first pass is now written and wired into the existing control surface. Before I treat it as settled, I’m checking whether it actually preserves the key distinction we reached: concrete end-to-end contract proof first, without weakening the evidence/register architecture or turning the new ticket list into the strategy. - -**Tool Use:** `oracle` - -```json -{ - "task": "Review the current uncommitted steering/control-surface diff for the September Brunch demo. Intended outcome: @docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md must be an objective-driven strategic model (not a roadmap/template or issue mirror) that captures this session's findings: the current implementation ends at durable captures; the missing controller/model/projection/correction loops are the critical architecture; the September scenario is a prebuilt CPS model reviewed for provenance then corrected in 3–5 turns; build a concrete CPS review-and-revise path before generic plugin breadth; preserve write-time semantics, pure fold, pure projection, provenance, and real-entrypoint verification; treat FE-1480's LLM-projection premise as unresolved; and adopt/fold FE-1476–FE-1482 into the old graph without making Linear writes. @docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md should remain the compact sequencing projection, and @docs/INDEX.md should register the new control document. Read the current diff plus @docs/adr/0003-three-register-ir.md, @docs/adr/0004-in-petrinaut-staging-and-the-monorepo-import.md, @docs/planning/process-model-elicitation/plugin-contract-spec.md, @docs/planning/process-model-elicitation/petrinaut-integration-spec.md, and relevant source if needed. Determine whether the steering model is strategically comprehensive and internally coherent under the roughly two-week constraint. Report only concrete high-impact omissions, contradictions, unjustified commitments, or sequencing errors, with the smallest correction for each. Explicitly assess whether the proof frontiers close the real semantic and deployed interaction loops rather than repeating the project's tracer-as-done failure. Ignore copyediting and unrelated repository findings." -} -``` - -## User - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CefPqdFOcX5VtYmUwLi` - -``` -## Verdict - -The steering document does what the outcome asked: it is an objective-driven strategic model, not a roadmap or issue mirror; it captures the durable-captures ceiling, the missing controller/model/projection/correction loops, the review-and-revise scenario, the CPS-before-breadth bet, the preserved invariants, the FE-1480 open question, and the no-Linear-writes issue adoption. COORDINATION correctly demotes itself to a projection of STEERING, and INDEX registers the new document. I verified the load-bearing status-table claims against source: `targetDocumentId` is derived from `conversationId` ([petrinaut-chat.ts#L33-L44](file:///Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/apps/brunch-agent/src/petrinaut-chat.ts#L33-L44)), the transport refuses machine tool-result follow-ups pending FE-1438 ([transport-aisdk/src/index.ts#L261-L291](file:///Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/transport-aisdk/src/index.ts#L261-L291)), and `Plugin` is identity plus exactly one proposal type ([core/src/plugin.ts#L32-L35](file:///Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core/src/plugin.ts#L32-L35)). - -Three findings should change the text before it ships. All are S-sized doc edits. - -## Blocking findings - -**1. The sweep — the declared single point of semantic failure — has no proof owner in the frontiers.** -The proof spine's arrow `reviewer question and scoped correction -> superseding capture` is the write-time sweep, which ADR-0003 and the plugin-contract spec (strain 7) name as the single point of semantic failure, and which the status table itself says cannot currently see active capture IDs or propose a supersession. Yet no frontier proof asserts it. Frontier 1's proof ("one source-grounded supersession changes the expected model field") can be passed with a hand-inserted superseding capture; Frontier 2's proof ("submits a scoped correction, and sees the returned apply result") can be passed by a controller that changes the projection without any superseding capture at all — its "no test-only injection" clause covers *wiring*, not *semantic extraction*. That is exactly the tracer-as-done shape the document warns against, surviving one layer deeper. -**Smallest fix:** one sentence added to the Frontier 2 proof (and mirrored in Frontier 1's join expectation): the applied net delta must trace to a superseding capture produced by the production sweep from the reviewer's actual utterance — not injected by the test or fabricated by the controller. - -**2. Frontier 0 doesn't constrain how the prebuilt fixture gets its register-1 content.** -Demo beat 3 is "captures to an exact source utterance," but a "prebuilt requirements-model/net fixture" authored directly at register 2 or 3 has no genuine source utterances — forward/reverse provenance queries would run against fabricated evidence, violating the doc's own "no layer may be a fixture masquerading as production wiring" rule at the layer the demo most depends on. Frontier 0 says "freeze one fixture" without stating this constraint. -**Smallest fix:** add to Frontier 0 that the fixture is a valid store state — source conversation plus captures produced through (or validated against) the production capture/fold path — not a hand-authored register-2/3 artifact, so that both provenance directions and the correction supersession run on real data. - -**3. FE-1331's deferral silently contradicts accepted ADR-0004.** -ADR-0004's consequences explicitly state "FE-1331 (start elicitation from create-new-net) is **un-deferred** — in-Petrinaut initiation is now the September topology, not the post-September one." STEERING says FE-1331 "is outside the current reviewer-against-existing-target scenario," and COORDINATION's exceptional-roots entry re-defers it — neither names the ADR. STEERING's own charter says it "may expose a conflict with a specification or ADR, but cannot silently override one," and this is a silent override: the review-and-revise scenario reverses ADR-0004's initiation-topology consequence. -**Smallest fix:** in the issue-projection bullet, name the conflict explicitly ("ADR-0004 un-deferred FE-1331; the FE-1476 scenario re-defers it — exposed conflict pending a dated ADR-0004 amendment or Dora's use-case confirmation") rather than treating the deferral as unremarkable. - -## Non-blocking follow-ups - -- **Controller's F1 dependency is implicit.** Frontier 2 mounts a controller that reads "the active model and selected region," which only exists once Frontier 1's read path lands; the frontiers "start in parallel" text could let F2 stall on it unnoticed. One clause noting that F2's controller-mounting step waits on F1's active-model read path (while session binding and tool-result admission proceed independently) would make the parallelism honest. -- **The petrinaut-integration-spec's user stories are now partially stale** (cold-start framing: "interview me about my process before building," "watch the net appear"). STEERING doesn't need to amend it, but a reconciliation note belongs on the next arc-close pass so the `active` spec doesn't contradict the demo claim. -- The other files in this diff (git-workflow, issue-writing, legibility protocol additions; import-plan `gt` wording) are unrelated to the steering model and raise no concerns. - -## Tracer-as-done assessment - -Apart from finding 1, the frontiers genuinely close the loops rather than repeating the failure: Frontier 1 proves semantic purity and bidirectional provenance at the production fold/projection APIs; Frontier 2 explicitly requires the real HTTP handler and panel with no test-only target or tool wiring; Frontier 3 requires a clean-browser run against the deployed surface, a reload survival, and the optimisation handoff. The status table's "Demo website" row and the belief-table replan condition ("seek an explicit demo-surface decision rather than quietly falling back to test-only wiring") show the failure mode is understood. Findings 1 and 2 are the two remaining seams where a fixture or hand-authored capture could still stand in for the real semantic path; closing them in the text closes the loop definition completely. -``` - -## Assistant - -The Oracle found two places where a “green” proof could still cheat: a hand-authored prebuilt model could fake provenance, and a hand-inserted supersession could fake correction. It also caught a real conflict with ADR-0004 around the create-new-net entrypoint. I’m tightening those acceptance boundaries rather than adding more plan structure. - -**Tool Use:** `apply_patch` - -```json -{ - "patchText": "*** Begin Patch\n*** Update File: /Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md\n@@\n Confirm the business use case, freeze one representative prebuilt requirements-model/net fixture,\n and name the optimisation handoff artifact. On that fixture, settle the FE-1480 authority question:\n which steps are write-time semantic capture, pure model fold, pure SDCPN projection, and document\n application?\n+\n+The prebuilt fixture must be a valid register-1 store state with a source conversation and\n+quote-anchored captures produced through, or independently validated against, the production\n+capture/fold path. A hand-authored register-2 model or register-3 net cannot prove provenance and\n+cannot serve as the correction baseline.\n \n **Proof:** one reviewed worked transformation in which every SDCPN element needed by the scenario\n traces to model fields and captures, with every non-mechanical judgment assigned to a write-time\n producer. If this cannot be drawn honestly, implementation should not freeze an interface.\n@@\n **Proof:** from the production fold/projection APIs, one source-grounded supersession changes the\n expected model field and corresponding SDCPN elements, leaves an unrelated region stable, and\n answers both forward and reverse provenance queries. A YAML or Markdown rendering of the model is\n-enough for inspection at this frontier.\n+enough for inspection at this frontier. The proving proposal must have the shape the production\n+sweep will emit; the cross-frontier join is not accepted until that sweep produces it from the\n+reviewer's actual utterance rather than a test inserting it directly.\n@@\n Allow a new conversation to bind to an existing target document. Admit the machine client-tool\n results needed to apply and diagnose a net change. Mount the narrow `review-and-revise` runbook and\n controller so that the active model and selected region, rather than the raw transcript alone,\n drive three to five questions.\n+\n+Session binding and client-tool admission may proceed in parallel with Frontier 1. Mounting the\n+controller against active model/issues waits for Frontier 1's production read path; do not replace\n+that dependency with request-shaped model context.\n \n **Proof:** through the real Brunch HTTP handler and Petrinaut panel, a reviewer selects the prepared\n region, receives a grounded explanation, submits a scoped correction, and sees the returned apply\n-result resume the same durable session. No test-only injection supplies the target or tool wiring.\n+result resume the same durable session. The net delta must trace to a superseding capture produced\n+by the production sweep from the reviewer's utterance, not one inserted by the test or fabricated\n+by the controller. No test-only injection supplies the target or tool wiring.\n@@\n-- FE-1331 (start from create-new-net) is outside the current reviewer-against-existing-target\n- scenario.\n+- FE-1331 (start from create-new-net) is outside the current reviewer-against-existing-target\n+ scenario, but ADR-0004 explicitly un-deferred it as September topology. The FE-1476 scenario\n+ therefore creates an exposed conflict pending Dora's confirmation and, if review-and-revise\n+ stands, a dated ADR-0004 amendment; this steering document does not silently re-defer it.\n - FE-1438, FE-1439, FE-1440, FE-1423 (pre-remote gates), and FE-1441 (deployment) remain real\n implementation obligations; the new issues state user outcomes rather than replacing these\n substrate and release seams.\n - FE-1402, FE-1403, FE-1406, and FE-1431 should produce only what the CPS runbook and domain\n contract consume. Their old standalone completion must not become a hidden prerequisite.\n+- The active Petrinaut integration spec still describes a cold-start interview in some user\n+ stories. Reconcile those stories with the confirmed scenario rather than treating this plan as a\n+ silent specification amendment.\n*** Update File: /Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md\n@@\n-- **FE-1331 — start elicitation from Petrinaut's create-new-net flow.** Deferred post-September\n- consumer topology; returns after in-Petrinaut staging proves itself.\n+- **FE-1331 — start elicitation from Petrinaut's create-new-net flow.** ADR-0004 un-deferred this as\n+ September topology, while FE-1476's new reviewer scenario starts from an existing target. Keep\n+ the conflict visible until Dora confirms the use case and the ADR is amended if necessary.\n*** End Patch" -} -``` - -## User - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CejRiYoQEn9tyZlBKRM` - -``` -{ - "files": [ - { - "uri": "file:///Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/%40hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md", - "diff": "Index: /Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md\n===================================================================\n--- /Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md\n+++ /Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md\n@@ -169,8 +169,13 @@\n and name the optimisation handoff artifact. On that fixture, settle the FE-1480 authority question:\n which steps are write-time semantic capture, pure model fold, pure SDCPN projection, and document\n application?\n \n+The prebuilt fixture must be a valid register-1 store state with a source conversation and\n+quote-anchored captures produced through, or independently validated against, the production\n+capture/fold path. A hand-authored register-2 model or register-3 net cannot prove provenance and\n+cannot serve as the correction baseline.\n+\n **Proof:** one reviewed worked transformation in which every SDCPN element needed by the scenario\n traces to model fields and captures, with every non-mechanical judgment assigned to a write-time\n producer. If this cannot be drawn honestly, implementation should not freeze an interface.\n \n@@ -182,20 +187,28 @@\n \n **Proof:** from the production fold/projection APIs, one source-grounded supersession changes the\n expected model field and corresponding SDCPN elements, leaves an unrelated region stable, and\n answers both forward and reverse provenance queries. A YAML or Markdown rendering of the model is\n-enough for inspection at this frontier.\n+enough for inspection at this frontier. The proving proposal must have the shape the production\n+sweep will emit; the cross-frontier join is not accepted until that sweep produces it from the\n+reviewer's actual utterance rather than a test inserting it directly.\n \n ### Frontier 2 — close the reviewer control loop\n \n Allow a new conversation to bind to an existing target document. Admit the machine client-tool\n results needed to apply and diagnose a net change. Mount the narrow `review-and-revise` runbook and\n controller so that the active model and selected region, rather than the raw transcript alone,\n drive three to five questions.\n \n+Session binding and client-tool admission may proceed in parallel with Frontier 1. Mounting the\n+controller against active model/issues waits for Frontier 1's production read path; do not replace\n+that dependency with request-shaped model context.\n+\n **Proof:** through the real Brunch HTTP handler and Petrinaut panel, a reviewer selects the prepared\n region, receives a grounded explanation, submits a scoped correction, and sees the returned apply\n-result resume the same durable session. No test-only injection supplies the target or tool wiring.\n+result resume the same durable session. The net delta must trace to a superseding capture produced\n+by the production sweep from the reviewer's utterance, not one inserted by the test or fabricated\n+by the controller. No test-only injection supplies the target or tool wiring.\n \n ### Frontier 3 — converge on the deployed demo\n \n Wire provider/mode routing, browser principal and private session lookup, remote transport,\n@@ -244,14 +257,19 @@\n \n - FE-1387 (second target and plugin-contract freeze) follows the CPS proof instead of preceding the\n demo.\n - FE-1331 (start from create-new-net) is outside the current reviewer-against-existing-target\n- scenario.\n+ scenario, but ADR-0004 explicitly un-deferred it as September topology. The FE-1476 scenario\n+ therefore creates an exposed conflict pending Dora's confirmation and, if review-and-revise\n+ stands, a dated ADR-0004 amendment; this steering document does not silently re-defer it.\n - FE-1438, FE-1439, FE-1440, FE-1423 (pre-remote gates), and FE-1441 (deployment) remain real\n implementation obligations; the new issues state user outcomes rather than replacing these\n substrate and release seams.\n - FE-1402, FE-1403, FE-1406, and FE-1431 should produce only what the CPS runbook and domain\n contract consume. Their old standalone completion must not become a hidden prerequisite.\n+- The active Petrinaut integration spec still describes a cold-start interview in some user\n+ stories. Reconcile those stories with the confirmed scenario rather than treating this plan as a\n+ silent specification amendment.\n \n ## Beliefs, risks, and replan conditions\n \n | Current belief | Confidence and evidence | Replan when |\n", - "type": "update", - "additions": 21, - "deletions": 3 - }, - { - "uri": "file:///Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/%40hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md", - "diff": "Index: /Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md\n===================================================================\n--- /Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md\n+++ /Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md\n@@ -128,10 +128,11 @@\n ## Exceptional roots\n \n These project issues intentionally have no parent and are roots under the registry rule:\n \n-- **FE-1331 — start elicitation from Petrinaut's create-new-net flow.** Deferred post-September\n- consumer topology; returns after in-Petrinaut staging proves itself.\n+- **FE-1331 — start elicitation from Petrinaut's create-new-net flow.** ADR-0004 un-deferred this as\n+ September topology, while FE-1476's new reviewer scenario starts from an existing target. Keep\n+ the conflict visible until Dora confirms the use case and the ADR is amended if necessary.\n - **FE-1334 — offer the user a surprising scenario of their model.** A validation gesture with\n no owning map yet; closest to the motif/quiver strategy work.\n - **FE-1406 — design reusable elicitation strategies.** The cross-map home for the\n harness-shipped generic strategy quiver; intentionally independent of either delivery map.\n", - "type": "update", - "additions": 3, - "deletions": 2 - } - ], - "summary": "update: /Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md (+21/-3)\nupdate: /Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md (+3/-2)" -} -``` - -## Assistant - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "cat docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent", - "timeout_ms": 10000 -} -``` - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "cat docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent", - "timeout_ms": 10000 -} -``` - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "sed -n '63,80p' docs/INDEX.md; git diff --check -- libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/INDEX.md libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash", - "timeout_ms": 10000 -} -``` - -## User - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CejrJFCxLm7ojcPqke4` - -``` -{ - "output": "# Brunch steering model\n\nThis is the current strategic understanding of Brunch: what outcome matters now, what the system\ncan actually do, which beliefs remain weak, and where to spend the next unit of time. Its immediate\ndecision horizon is the September demo, but it steers the whole context rather than one package or\none Linear map.\n\nThis is not a roadmap, a specification, or an issue mirror. Specifications and accepted ADRs define\nobligations and settled architecture. Linear is canonical for issue state, hierarchy, and hard\nblockers. [COORDINATION](./COORDINATION.md) projects this strategy onto the mechanically available\nwork. This document owns the judgment between them: which objective to pursue under the current\ntime, evidence, risk, and product pressure; what to defer; and what new evidence would change that\nchoice. It may expose a conflict with a specification or ADR, but cannot silently override one.\n\nThe document remains live. A steering pass orients from current evidence, chooses a frontier,\nexecutes to a named proof, reconciles the result with specifications and issues, then replans only\nwhere the evidence changed. Git carries the history; this file carries only the current model. Its\nshape is intentionally specific to the present effort. Do not extract a generic template or skill\nuntil a second real planning cycle shows which parts recur.\n\n## The September outcome\n\nAs of **2026-08-24**, the working constraint is roughly two human weeks. The event date and final\nbusiness use case are not yet recorded here; Dora's confirmation is a decision gate, not an excuse\nto leave the technical spine vague.\n\nFE-1476 (the September demo delivery) supplies the working scenario:\n\n1. A reviewer opens a prebuilt cyber-physical-process requirements model and its generated SDCPN in\n Petrinaut.\n2. The reviewer selects or describes a net element and asks why it was modelled that way.\n3. Brunch traces the answer through the requirements model and captures to an exact source\n utterance.\n4. The reviewer scopes one correction and conducts three to five focused chat turns.\n5. New or superseding captures change the elicited model; reprojection changes the corresponding\n part of the live net without rebuilding unrelated parts.\n6. The resulting artifact is handed to the existing optimisation experiment flow.\n\nThis is a **review-and-revise** demonstration. It does not need to prove that Brunch can elicit an\nentire CPS model from a blank conversation. It does need to prove a closed semantic and interaction\nloop. A chat transcript beside a static fixture, an unexplained net mutation, or a test that injects\nwiring absent from the deployed entrypoint does not satisfy the outcome.\n\nThe proof spine is therefore:\n\n```text\nsource utterance\n -> active typed capture\n -> folded CPS requirements model\n -> SDCPN element + provenance\n -> reviewer question and scoped correction\n -> superseding capture\n -> changed folded model\n -> changed live SDCPN\n -> optimisation handoff\n```\n\n## Where the system actually stands\n\nThe package topology is in place and the implemented tracer is real, but the September loop is not\nan incremental extension of an almost-finished product. Most of the contract-bearing middle is\nabsent.\n\n| Surface | Evidence now | September consequence |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Ask, suspend, return | A user answer to `brunch_ask` survives the AI SDK/Flue boundary and resumes durable history. | Reuse; do not redesign the ask protocol. |\n| Settlement and capture | A settled range is privately swept into quote-anchored captures and applied atomically. Supersession and active-head validation exist in the store. | Preserve as the evidence foundation, but expose active state to the controller. |\n| Plugin SDK | The exported `Plugin` is deliberately only identity plus exactly one proposal type. Gherkin captures one verbatim statement. | There is no implemented fold, demand runner, model, projection, or useful hard-target plugin to extend. |\n| Elicitation control | The agent receives general ask/sweep instructions. Sweep extraction sees a conversation range and proposal names only. No production path reads the active capture set or a derived model back into the interview. | Brunch cannot yet choose a next question from what it has learned or conduct a targeted correction. |\n| CPS semantics | The three-register design and provisional two-schema/two-table plugin contract are desk-designed. No `plugin-cps` exists. | The critical semantic path must be built against a concrete CPS case, not inferred from Gherkin completeness. |\n| Correction | The store can represent supersession, but extraction cannot see active capture IDs, model issues, or the target region; Gherkin cannot propose a supersession. | Targeted re-elicitation is structurally unreachable despite the storage mechanics being present. |\n| Petrinaut transport | Local panel streaming and human ask-return work. Machine client-tool-result follow-ups are explicitly refused pending FE-1438 (the client-tool round-trip). | The agent cannot yet apply a projection to the live document and receive the result. |\n| Session target | The current application derives `targetDocumentId` from `conversationId`. | A new reviewer session cannot address a pre-existing elicitation target without changing this identity boundary. |\n| Demo website | The production website still uses its stock assistant route. The `/brunch` Actual Mode is a separate read-only fixture/SSE surface. | Local tracer proof must not be mistaken for deployed integration. |\n\nThe decisive reading is that the current design is not too rigorous in its preservation of\nevidence, correction, or register boundaries. It is too broad and too generic for the remaining\ntime. Completing generic plugin machinery, a second target, a full CPS ontology, and a cold-start\ninterviewer before crossing the real reviewer loop would optimize the library while leaving the\ndemo hollow.\n\n## The strategic bet\n\nBuild the smallest honest **CPS review-and-revise loop** through all three registers and the real\nPetrinaut entrypoint. Let that concrete implementation discover the minimum plugin interface, then\ngeneralize only what the CPS case and existing Gherkin case both need.\n\nThis is not permission to take another thin tracer as the definition of done. The vertical proof is\ncontract-bearing: it includes model assembly, provenance, targeted correction, reprojection,\napplication, and the deployed route. Breadth inside each layer may be narrow; no layer in that loop\nmay be a fixture masquerading as production wiring.\n\nThe bet preserves these load-bearing decisions:\n\n- Captures remain the durable, source-grounded assertion register.\n- Every semantic inference happens at write time and is recorded as a contestable capture.\n- The elicited model is a pure fold over active captures and every model part names its supporting\n capture IDs.\n- SDCPN projection consumes the elicited model without rereading the transcript or making hidden\n semantic judgments.\n- Petrinaut application and diagnostics are separate from semantic projection: the application may\n use client tools to apply a projected artifact, but it does not become the authority that invents\n the model.\n- A correction supersedes or adds assertions and re-runs the fold and projection; it does not patch\n an unexplained net element directly.\n\nFE-1480 (requirements-model-to-SDCPN inference) challenges the third and fourth decisions by\nassuming the projection itself requires LLM inference. That assumption is unresolved. If a worked\nCPS case proves that the register-2 model is insufficient for pure projection, the honest choices\nare to record the missing semantic judgment as a capture before folding or to amend ADR-0003 (the\nthree-register IR) explicitly. Hiding inference inside a read-time projection is not an available\nshortcut.\n\n## The elicitor architecture under this load\n\nThe discussion began with four parts; the current model has five responsibilities across the\nharness and plugin layers, plus one per-engagement input. The missing responsibility is the\ncontroller that closes the loop between captured evidence and the next move.\n\n| Responsibility | Owner | What it contains | State and September obligation |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Strategy repertoire | Harness | Orientations, motivations, conversational licences, interviewing techniques, and question-formulation guidance. | Partly researched, not operationally selected. Implement only the techniques used by the review-and-revise runbook. |\n| Evidence engine | Harness | Archive, settlement sweep, quote anchoring, durable captures, issues, conflict, supersession, and provenance primitives. | Strongest implemented layer. Add the active-model/issues read path needed by control and correction; do not broaden storage semantics without evidence. |\n| Elicitation controller | Harness | Reads the engagement brief, active folded model and issues, current runbook, and strategy repertoire; chooses `ask`, `propose`, `contrast`, `validate`, `project`, `explain`, or `stop`. | Absent. Build the narrow controller loop needed to explain and revise one selected region. |\n| Domain contract | Plugin | Proposal and model schemas; identity, fold, grade, demand, diagnostics, projection, and provenance rules for one target domain. | Designed but unimplemented. Build the CPS subset exercised by the fixture and correction; let it pressure the generic interface. |\n| Job runbooks | Plugin | Named jobs over the same domain: objectives, entry conditions, trajectories, demand/completion rules, checks, stopping, revision, boundaries, and handoff. | Absent. Implement `review-and-revise`; defer a complete cold-start runbook. |\n\nThe **engagement brief** is dynamic input, not plugin policy: target document, participant role,\nobjective, scope, known constraints, allowed actions, and time budget for this run. For September it\nbinds a reviewer to an existing target and one revisable region.\n\nA separate free-form “next-question ledger” should not become another authority. Most of it is a\nderived control trace:\n\n```text\nrunbook demand -> model gap or issue -> candidate move -> chosen move -> concrete ask\n```\n\nPersist only what replay, audit, or explicit user commitment requires. The controller must be able\nto explain its chosen move from the runbook and active model; it must not accumulate an independent\nshadow plan.\n\nThe September `review-and-revise` runbook is provisionally:\n\n```text\nentry:\n existing target + folded requirements model + projected net + reviewer scope\ntrajectory:\n orient -> select -> explain provenance -> frame correction\n -> ask/validate (3-5 turns) -> show semantic and net delta -> confirm -> hand off\ndone:\n scoped demands are met at the declared grade\n no open conflict blocks the selected projection\n reviewer confirms the intended delta\n every changed net element retains provenance\nboundary:\n do not expand into cold-start elicitation or unrelated net repair\n```\n\n## Proof frontiers and execution order\n\nThe work has four frontiers. They are ordered by learning dependency, not by which ticket is\ncurrently unblocked. The semantic and experience lanes start in parallel after Frontier 0, then\njoin as early as possible; they are not two long independent streams to integrate at the end.\n\n### Frontier 0 — make the demo claim decidable\n\nConfirm the business use case, freeze one representative prebuilt requirements-model/net fixture,\nand name the optimisation handoff artifact. On that fixture, settle the FE-1480 authority question:\nwhich steps are write-time semantic capture, pure model fold, pure SDCPN projection, and document\napplication?\n\nThe prebuilt fixture must be a valid register-1 store state with a source conversation and\nquote-anchored captures produced through, or independently validated against, the production\ncapture/fold path. A hand-authored register-2 model or register-3 net cannot prove provenance and\ncannot serve as the correction baseline.\n\n**Proof:** one reviewed worked transformation in which every SDCPN element needed by the scenario\ntraces to model fields and captures, with every non-mechanical judgment assigned to a write-time\nproducer. If this cannot be drawn honestly, implementation should not freeze an interface.\n\n### Frontier 1 — close the CPS semantic loop\n\nImplement only the CPS proposal kinds, model slots, identity/fold rules, demands, projection, and\nprovenance exercised by the fixture and one realistic correction. Carry capture IDs through every\nderived layer. Make active model issues and selected-region context available to the controller.\n\n**Proof:** from the production fold/projection APIs, one source-grounded supersession changes the\nexpected model field and corresponding SDCPN elements, leaves an unrelated region stable, and\nanswers both forward and reverse provenance queries. A YAML or Markdown rendering of the model is\nenough for inspection at this frontier. The proving proposal must have the shape the production\nsweep will emit; the cross-frontier join is not accepted until that sweep produces it from the\nreviewer's actual utterance rather than a test inserting it directly.\n\n### Frontier 2 — close the reviewer control loop\n\nAllow a new conversation to bind to an existing target document. Admit the machine client-tool\nresults needed to apply and diagnose a net change. Mount the narrow `review-and-revise` runbook and\ncontroller so that the active model and selected region, rather than the raw transcript alone,\ndrive three to five questions.\n\nSession binding and client-tool admission may proceed in parallel with Frontier 1. Mounting the\ncontroller against active model/issues waits for Frontier 1's production read path; do not replace\nthat dependency with request-shaped model context.\n\n**Proof:** through the real Brunch HTTP handler and Petrinaut panel, a reviewer selects the prepared\nregion, receives a grounded explanation, submits a scoped correction, and sees the returned apply\nresult resume the same durable session. The net delta must trace to a superseding capture produced\nby the production sweep from the reviewer's utterance, not one inserted by the test or fabricated\nby the controller. No test-only injection supplies the target or tool wiring.\n\n### Frontier 3 — converge on the deployed demo\n\nWire provider/mode routing, browser principal and private session lookup, remote transport,\ndeployment gates, and the optimisation handoff. Rehearse the exact scenario with a clean browser\nagainst the deployed demo surface.\n\n**Proof:** a screen-recordable run completes the six September beats, survives one reload, exposes\nthe before/after requirements-model delta, and hands the resulting SDCPN to the optimisation flow.\nDiagnostics show the source capture and projection identities needed to investigate a failure.\n\n## What is deliberately cut\n\nUntil the proof spine is closed:\n\n- Do not freeze a broad declarative plugin SDK or require a second hard target. Extract the shared\n contract after CPS has stressed it.\n- Do not make the Gherkin artifact path a prerequisite for the CPS demo.\n- Do not build a full requirements-graph UI. FE-1481's YAML or Markdown export is the selected\n fallback; a UI earns time only if the core loop is already green.\n- Do not build a complete cold-start CPS interview, general target gallery, every affordance type,\n voice input, surprising-scenario generation, or broad telemetry vocabulary.\n- Do not implement a comprehensive CPS ontology. Support the fixture, the correction, and the\n optimisation handoff while keeping the data model honest about what it omits.\n- Do not bypass provenance or write-time semantics to make a visually convincing net mutation.\n\nThese are sequencing cuts, not claims that the deferred obligations are unimportant.\n\n## Issue projection\n\nThe PM-authored issues are adopted here as the September delivery decomposition. Linear has not yet\nbeen changed; its current unparented state is recorded in COORDINATION until an explicitly approved\nregistry update. The recommended hierarchy is FE-1357 (September planning and plugin design) →\nFE-1476 (September delivery) → FE-1477 through FE-1482.\n\n| Issue | Strategic role | Reconciliation with existing work |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| FE-1476 — prepare the September demo | Outcome owner and acceptance narrative. | Child of FE-1357 while that map remains active; owns rehearsal and handoff rather than implementation details. |\n| FE-1477 — route Petrinaut AI and Brunch | Experience-lane entry and mode selection. | Product acceptance overlaps FE-1440 (ship the elicitor in the demo site). Keep one implementation owner; do not build two switches. |\n| FE-1478 — trace a generated net to requirements | Provenance acceptance through registers 3 → 2 → 1 → utterance. | Must shape Frontier 1 from its first model/projection types, not arrive as post-hoc metadata. |\n| FE-1479 — targeted re-elicitation | Convergence issue for the reviewer loop. | Consumes FE-1438's machine client-tool/application path, FE-1439's session ownership, and the CPS correction path; it does not own a second mutation mechanism. |\n| FE-1480 — infer requirements model to SDCPN | Authority and projection decision, then the production projector. | Must be reconciled with ADR-0003 before implementation. FE-1438 owns browser application, not hidden semantic projection. |\n| FE-1481 — expose the requirements model | Inspection fallback and demo delta surface. | Select YAML/Markdown first. Defer FE-1442's broader live capture/completion UI unless the proof spine closes early. |\n| FE-1482 — add the CPS plugin | Semantic-lane owner and concrete pressure on the plugin boundary. | Pulls the demo-critical slices from FE-1402 (completion), FE-1403 (CPS guidance), FE-1406 (strategies), and FE-1431 (declarative contract). FE-1393 remains the generic/Gherkin path and no longer gates September. |\n\nOther consequences for the old graph:\n\n- FE-1387 (second target and plugin-contract freeze) follows the CPS proof instead of preceding the\n demo.\n- FE-1331 (start from create-new-net) is outside the current reviewer-against-existing-target\n scenario, but ADR-0004 explicitly un-deferred it as September topology. The FE-1476 scenario\n therefore creates an exposed conflict pending Dora's confirmation and, if review-and-revise\n stands, a dated ADR-0004 amendment; this steering document does not silently re-defer it.\n- FE-1438, FE-1439, FE-1440, FE-1423 (pre-remote gates), and FE-1441 (deployment) remain real\n implementation obligations; the new issues state user outcomes rather than replacing these\n substrate and release seams.\n- FE-1402, FE-1403, FE-1406, and FE-1431 should produce only what the CPS runbook and domain\n contract consume. Their old standalone completion must not become a hidden prerequisite.\n- The active Petrinaut integration spec still describes a cold-start interview in some user\n stories. Reconcile those stories with the confirmed scenario rather than treating this plan as a\n silent specification amendment.\n\n## Beliefs, risks, and replan conditions\n\n| Current belief | Confidence and evidence | Replan when |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| A bounded review-and-revise scenario can carry the September product claim without cold-start elicitation. | Medium. It is the written FE-1476 scenario, but Dora has not confirmed the use case. | The confirmed use case requires model creation rather than review, or the optimisation handoff requires fields absent from the fixture. |\n| A concrete CPS implementation will discover a better minimum plugin contract faster than completing the generic design first. | Medium-high. Gherkin deliberately under-stresses the interface; CPS is the first real consumer. | The first worked CPS transformation cannot be expressed without a reusable harness primitive that must precede it. Build that primitive, then return immediately to the vertical proof. |\n| Register 2 can be rich enough for pure SDCPN projection. | Low-medium. ADR-0003 requires it, but no real fold or projector exists and FE-1480 asserts non-determinism. | The worked transformation identifies an unavoidable semantic choice not represented in captures/model. Record it earlier or explicitly revisit the ADR. |\n| Three to five turns can produce a meaningful scoped correction. | Low. No CPS runbook has been rehearsed. | Two rehearsals exceed the budget or require unrelated context. Narrow the region, preload explicit context, or revise the demo claim rather than script fake success. |\n| The proven ask suspension can extend to document-application client tools. | Medium-low. The suspension spike succeeded, but the production transport intentionally refuses machine tool-result follow-ups. | The first tool round-trip cannot preserve correlation, durability, or non-user evidence semantics. Treat this as a critical integration blocker, not a UI detail. |\n| The production website and remote server can be joined inside the timebox. | Medium-low. Local host seams exist; provider routing, session ownership, deployment, and release gates do not yet converge. | A deployable path is not proved by the end of Frontier 2. Preserve the real semantic loop and seek an explicit demo-surface decision rather than quietly falling back to test-only wiring. |\n| Requirements-model UI is unnecessary for comprehension. | Medium. The reviewer needs inspectability, but FE-1481 explicitly permits export. | Rehearsal shows that provenance and delta cannot be understood from chat plus a structured export. |\n\n## Current choice\n\nStop treating “unblocked” as “next.” The next strategic move is to run Frontier 0 immediately and\nopen Frontiers 1 and 2 in parallel: one worked CPS semantic slice and one existing-target reviewer\nsession/tool-return slice. Join them at the earliest correction, then drive the same bones through\nprovider routing and deployment. The generic Gherkin/plugin-freeze path and broad UI work wait for\nthat join.\n\nRevisit this choice as soon as Dora confirms the use case, the FE-1480 worked transformation lands,\nor either parallel frontier fails its first proof. A steering pass that only updates ticket status\ndoes not change this document; a new fact that changes the objective, proof spine, authority\nboundary, or cut line does.\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CejrKhsqzE7ZBmXWT1H` - -``` -{ - "output": "# Project coordination\n\nThis is the cross-map coordination surface for the `brunch-agent` project. FE-1383 owns the\nmilestone-one harness build; FE-1357 owns the September demo and process-model plugin design.\nLinear is canonical for issue state, parentage, and hard `blocks` relations. The\n[steering model](./STEERING.md) chooses the current objective, proof frontiers, and cuts under\npressure. This file projects that strategy onto mechanically available work: the current\nproject-wide recommendation, soft edges, unresolved seams, and exceptional roots.\n\nBefore revising the recommendation, run\n`turbo run linear:graph --filter '@hashintel/brunch-agent'`. Its compact projection supplies the\nfactual open-issue DAG; read the relevant issue bodies for semantic content, then infer the smallest\nhonest recommendation. Do not paste the generated graph here or mirror issue status.\n\n## Current sequencing recommendation\n\nAs of **2026-08-24**, FE-1476 (the September demo delivery) changes the recommendation from generic\npackage completion to a concrete CPS review-and-revise proof. After FE-1437 (the monorepo import)\nlands, open two fronts in parallel. The semantic front starts FE-1482 (the CPS plugin) against one\nworked fixture and settles FE-1480's requirements-model-to-SDCPN authority boundary before it\nimplements a projector; FE-1478 (net-to-requirements provenance) is part of that spine from its\nfirst types. The experience front advances FE-1438 (machine client-tool round-trip) and FE-1439\n(private sessions) far enough for a new reviewer conversation to target an existing document,\nwhile FE-1477/FE-1440 share one provider-routing implementation. Join the fronts at FE-1479\n(targeted re-elicitation), then drive the same path through FE-1423's pre-exposure gates and\nFE-1441 deployment.\n\nFE-1393's generic Gherkin artifact and FE-1387's second-target contract freeze no longer gate the\nSeptember proof. FE-1402, FE-1403, FE-1406, and FE-1431 supply only the completion, guidance,\nstrategy, and contract slices the CPS `review-and-revise` runbook consumes. FE-1481 selects\nYAML/Markdown export as the requirements-model inspection floor; broad UI follows only if the\nclosed loop is already proved.\n\n```text\nlegend:\n -[hard]-> native Linear blocker\n -[coord]-> either order; do not implement concurrently\n -[input]-> semantic input, not a blocker\n -[state-gate]-> condition in the world, not an issue edge\n\nnodes:\n FE-1437 [executed, landing] # history imported; HASH authoritative; PR pending\n FE-1476 [objective] # September reviewer demo\n FE-1482 [next, semantic] # concrete CPS plugin + review/revise runbook\n FE-1480 [decision, semantic] # model/projection authority, then projector\n FE-1478 [semantic proof] # provenance through all three registers\n FE-1438 [next, experience] # machine client-tool round-trip + application\n FE-1439 [next, experience] # existing-target reviewer session ownership\n FE-1477/FE-1440 [experience] # one provider-routing implementation\n FE-1479 [join] # targeted correction changes the live net\n FE-1481 [fallback] # structured model export before UI\n FE-1441 [deployed proof] # HASH deployment\n\nedges:\n FE-1449 -[hard]-> FE-1438\n FE-1438, FE-1439,\n FE-1437 -[hard]-> FE-1440\n FE-1437, FE-1439,\n FE-1423 -[hard]-> FE-1441\n FE-1437 branch on main -[state-gate]-> FE-1438, FE-1439, FE-1393\n FE-1480 decision -[input]-> FE-1482, FE-1478\n FE-1402, FE-1403,\n FE-1406, FE-1431 -[input]-> FE-1482\n FE-1482, FE-1478,\n FE-1438, FE-1439 -[input]-> FE-1479\n FE-1479, FE-1440 -[input]-> FE-1441\n```\n\nHard-edge truth remains in Linear. The graph above is a deliberately focused recommendation,\nnot a second issue database.\n\n## Repository handoff threshold\n\nFE-1437 (the monorepo import; [execution plan](./hash-monorepo-import-plan.md)) was the authority\ncutover, not a general freeze on harness work. It was crossed on 2026-08-21:\n\n```text\nbrunch-lite authoritative (until 2026-08-21)\n FE-1434 + FE-1435 verdicts landed\n FE-1388/1389/1390/1399 review stack merged\n |\n v\n == FE-1437 import (executed) ==\n |\n v\nhashintel/hash authoritative (now)\n FE-1440 website wiring + FE-1441 deployment\n```\n\nThe standalone repository is frozen at SHA `43a0022918861846344b96a32cb94f92e2ee96ae` and is\nread-only reference material. All further work — including FE-1438 and FE-1439, which were not\nimport gates — happens in `hashintel/hash`. Do not run both repositories as writable authorities.\nClosing out the standalone repository's shared state (archival, access) is deferred and requires\nexplicit approval from Lu.\n\n## Open seams\n\n- **Projection authority — FE-1480.** The ticket assumes non-deterministic LLM inference from the\n requirements model to SDCPN, while ADR-0003 requires write-time-only semantic inference and a\n pure projection. A worked CPS transformation must assign every judgment to capture, fold,\n projection, or document application before the interface freezes.\n- **Controller and runbook.** The harness does not read the folded model or open issues back into\n the agent, and no plugin defines a job trajectory or stopping rule. FE-1482 must exercise the\n narrow `review-and-revise` loop; FE-1406 and FE-1402/FE-1403 are inputs, not parallel products.\n- **Reviewer target identity — FE-1439 × FE-1479.** The current host derives target-document\n identity from conversation identity. September requires a new reviewer conversation against an\n existing target without weakening owner isolation.\n- **Contract freeze — FE-1387.** The CPS target must stress the plugin contract before it freezes.\n The freeze follows the September semantic proof rather than gating it.\n- **Absence locator.** An absence capture carries no payload, but the fold needs a field-specific\n coordinate (anchor × slot). The plugin-contract spec records three worked cases; any envelope\n amendment belongs to the harness side of this seam.\n- **Structured-tap evidence — FE-1395 × capture store.** `resolve-conflict` currently rejects\n `user-affordance-payload` evidence. FE-1395 must decide the transport fact before the store\n rule can settle.\n- **Guidance placement — FE-1403 × FE-1406.** Plugin cards and the harness-shipped generic\n strategy quiver share authoring methods but not ownership. Packages export; hosts register.\n- **Telemetry vocabulary — FE-1385 × FE-1404 × FE-1423.** The probe surface, experiment\n accounting, and remote telemetry should share span vocabulary rather than invent it three\n times.\n- **Living-prototype charter.** The deployed elicitor as a cumulative record of proved and\n unproved behavior remains pre-charter until the infrastructure conversation settles.\n\nSettled seam decisions still governing open work: FE-1392 established the plugin-declared\nverbatim proposal floor, and ask accounting remains a read-time relation rather than an envelope\nfield. ADR-0003 keeps field-level structure below the capture's single epistemic status.\n\n## Exceptional roots\n\nThese project issues intentionally have no parent and are roots under the registry rule:\n\n- **FE-1331 — start elicitation from Petrinaut's create-new-net flow.** ADR-0004 un-deferred this as\n September topology, while FE-1476's new reviewer scenario starts from an existing target. Keep\n the conflict visible until Dora confirms the use case and the ADR is amended if necessary.\n- **FE-1334 — offer the user a surprising scenario of their model.** A validation gesture with\n no owning map yet; closest to the motif/quiver strategy work.\n- **FE-1406 — design reusable elicitation strategies.** The cross-map home for the\n harness-shipped generic strategy quiver; intentionally independent of either delivery map.\n- **FE-1472 — evaluate the nested Anthropic SDK pin.** Unrelated triage root; no owning delivery\n map has been chosen.\n- **FE-1476 — prepare the September demo.** Temporary delivery root pending the recommended fold\n under FE-1357.\n- **FE-1477 through FE-1482 — September outcome slices.** PM-authored issues adopted by the\n steering model but not yet folded in Linear. The recommended parent is FE-1476; overlaps and\n ownership boundaries are recorded in STEERING's issue projection before external mutation.\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CejrLBy1mv7nq81RC0k` - -``` -{ - "output": "sed: docs/INDEX.md: No such file or directory\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -## Assistant - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "sed -n '63,80p' docs/INDEX.md", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent", - "timeout_ms": 10000 -} -``` - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "git diff --check -- libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/INDEX.md libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md; git diff --stat -- libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/INDEX.md libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash", - "timeout_ms": 10000 -} -``` - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "git diff -- libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/INDEX.md libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md | sed -n '1,340p'", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash", - "timeout_ms": 10000 -} -``` - -## User - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034Cek53htAlJQWEntJALf` - -``` -{ - "output": "| [notes/deep-read-fe-1389](planning/process-model-elicitation/notes/deep-read-fe-1389.md) | active | FE-1401 / findings in FE-1420 | Deep-read of the walking skeleton: builder's account, spec-discharge table (issues 10/13 capabilities discharged; markdown floor contradicted in the UI), 12 findings; source of PR #10's backfilled record |\n| [notes/deep-read-fe-1390](planning/process-model-elicitation/notes/deep-read-fe-1390.md) | active | FE-1401 / probes on FE-1419 | Deep-read of the capture store: spec-discharge table, write-time tiering assessment (penciled item 7), the FE-1405 status-arity answer, and live-probed confirmation of FE-1419's capture-store claims plus one new aliasing hole; source of PR #11's backfilled record |\n| [plugin-contract-spec](planning/process-model-elicitation/plugin-contract-spec.md) | active | FE-1431 (spec issue); decided on FE-1405 | Provisional spec: a plugin is two schemas and two tables (model schema, proposal catalog, fold table, demand table) over the three-register IR (ADR-0003) — harness-machinery typology, standard-interiors library, grade-as-narrowing, derived fold rules; strains 4–7 and envelope pressure #2 held open with owners |\n\n## planning/\\_shared (cross-effort control documents)\n\n| Document | Status | Linear | Digest |\n| -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |\n| [COORDINATION](planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md) | active | cross-project; maintained by arc-close | Current sequencing recommendation, soft cross-map edges, unresolved seams, and exceptional roots; hard blockers, state, and hierarchy remain in Linear |\n| [hash-monorepo-import-plan](planning/_shared/hash-monorepo-import-plan.md) | active until FE-1437 lands | FE-1437 | Native HASH assimilation plan: preserved history and child package workspaces under one Brunch context root, explicit authority cutover, exhaustive repository-material disposition, toolchain port, boundary gates, and verification |\n| [SPEC-LEDGER](planning/_shared/SPEC-LEDGER.md) | active until milestone-one closure | FE-1383 | Obligation-level status and evidence ledger for the elicitation-kernel specification; settles when the milestone closes |\n| [STEERING](planning/_shared/STEERING.md) | active | FE-1357 / FE-1476 | Current objective-driven strategy for the September CPS review-and-revise proof: evidence, architectural pressure, proof frontiers, cuts, issue projection, risks, and replan conditions |\n| [flue-architecture-cheatsheet](planning/_shared/flue-architecture-cheatsheet.md) | active | commented on FE-1383; feeds docs/agents/flue-routing.md | Architect's consolidation of all 21 Flue guide pages: direct structured generation uses `harness.prompt`; model-delegated work uses `useSubagent`; three-lane boundary summary and ranked divergence risks; reconciled against installed Flue 2.0.3 source |\n| [topology](planning/_shared/topology.md) | active | ratified → ADR-0002; N1 discharged by FE-1422 + FE-1392; local N5 implemented by FE-1391; N3 amended by FE-1437 | Pseudo-style verification of the package/app tree against the three-lane model and spec §12.2: portable ask/sweep protocols, Flue binding wiring, package boundaries, and application-only Brunch–Petrinaut composition |\n\n## planning/legibility-sweep (FE-1401 arc records)\n\n| Document | Status | Linear | Digest |\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034Cek55eiK2UBnapC75mu` - -``` -{ - "output": " libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/INDEX.md | 1 +\n .../docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md | 93 ++++++++++++++--------\n 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034Cek56pKeADZNxtxu42g` - -``` -{ - "output": "diff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/INDEX.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/INDEX.md\nindex ca6ea309c0..b0834155a7 100644\n--- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/INDEX.md\n+++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/INDEX.md\n@@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ _(empty — items settle out via the arc-close inbox sweep)_\n | [COORDINATION](planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md) | active | cross-project; maintained by arc-close | Current sequencing recommendation, soft cross-map edges, unresolved seams, and exceptional roots; hard blockers, state, and hierarchy remain in Linear |\n | [hash-monorepo-import-plan](planning/_shared/hash-monorepo-import-plan.md) | active until FE-1437 lands | FE-1437 | Native HASH assimilation plan: preserved history and child package workspaces under one Brunch context root, explicit authority cutover, exhaustive repository-material disposition, toolchain port, boundary gates, and verification |\n | [SPEC-LEDGER](planning/_shared/SPEC-LEDGER.md) | active until milestone-one closure | FE-1383 | Obligation-level status and evidence ledger for the elicitation-kernel specification; settles when the milestone closes |\n+| [STEERING](planning/_shared/STEERING.md) | active | FE-1357 / FE-1476 | Current objective-driven strategy for the September CPS review-and-revise proof: evidence, architectural pressure, proof frontiers, cuts, issue projection, risks, and replan conditions |\n | [flue-architecture-cheatsheet](planning/_shared/flue-architecture-cheatsheet.md) | active | commented on FE-1383; feeds docs/agents/flue-routing.md | Architect's consolidation of all 21 Flue guide pages: direct structured generation uses `harness.prompt`; model-delegated work uses `useSubagent`; three-lane boundary summary and ranked divergence risks; reconciled against installed Flue 2.0.3 source |\n | [topology](planning/_shared/topology.md) | active | ratified → ADR-0002; N1 discharged by FE-1422 + FE-1392; local N5 implemented by FE-1391; N3 amended by FE-1437 | Pseudo-style verification of the package/app tree against the three-lane model and spec §12.2: portable ask/sweep protocols, Flue binding wiring, package boundaries, and application-only Brunch–Petrinaut composition |\n \ndiff --git a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md\nindex 54e343fb83..8c2d3d1ca4 100644\n--- a/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md\n+++ b/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md\n@@ -2,9 +2,10 @@\n \n This is the cross-map coordination surface for the `brunch-agent` project. FE-1383 owns the\n milestone-one harness build; FE-1357 owns the September demo and process-model plugin design.\n-Linear is canonical for issue state, parentage, and hard `blocks` relations. This file owns\n-only the judgment Linear cannot express: the current project-wide recommendation, soft edges,\n-unresolved seams, and exceptional roots.\n+Linear is canonical for issue state, parentage, and hard `blocks` relations. The\n+[steering model](./STEERING.md) chooses the current objective, proof frontiers, and cuts under\n+pressure. This file projects that strategy onto mechanically available work: the current\n+project-wide recommendation, soft edges, unresolved seams, and exceptional roots.\n \n Before revising the recommendation, run\n `turbo run linear:graph --filter '@hashintel/brunch-agent'`. Its compact projection supplies the\n@@ -13,19 +14,22 @@ honest recommendation. Do not paste the generated graph here or mirror issue sta\n \n ## Current sequencing recommendation\n \n-As of **2026-08-21**, the FE-1437 authority cutover has been executed: the full brunch-lite\n-history is imported on `ln/fe-1437-hash-monorepo-import` in `hashintel/hash` (frozen standalone\n-SHA `43a0022918861846344b96a32cb94f92e2ee96ae`), every import gate re-verified. `hashintel/hash`\n-is authoritative; the standalone repository accepts no further implementation work. FE-1437\n-closes when the branch lands on `main` (squash merge, per convention). Part of FE-1440's website\n-wiring (the Brunch interactive-tool panel in `apps/petrinaut-website`) travelled with the import\n-branch; FE-1440 was trimmed on 2026-08-21 to the remaining mode wiring (mode switch, browser\n-identifier bootstrap, remote transport swap). After landing, advance FE-1438 (client-tool round-trip)\n-beside FE-1393 (plugin SDK and first projection); FE-1439 (private durable sessions) proceeds in\n-parallel. The integration stream joins at FE-1440 and deployment follows at FE-1441 (which also\n-waits on FE-1423's pre-exposure gates), while the harness stream reaches its contract-freeze\n-decision at FE-1387. FE-1402/FE-1403 form a parallel content/evaluation stream, without\n-displacing the two convergence edges.\n+As of **2026-08-24**, FE-1476 (the September demo delivery) changes the recommendation from generic\n+package completion to a concrete CPS review-and-revise proof. After FE-1437 (the monorepo import)\n+lands, open two fronts in parallel. The semantic front starts FE-1482 (the CPS plugin) against one\n+worked fixture and settles FE-1480's requirements-model-to-SDCPN authority boundary before it\n+implements a projector; FE-1478 (net-to-requirements provenance) is part of that spine from its\n+first types. The experience front advances FE-1438 (machine client-tool round-trip) and FE-1439\n+(private sessions) far enough for a new reviewer conversation to target an existing document,\n+while FE-1477/FE-1440 share one provider-routing implementation. Join the fronts at FE-1479\n+(targeted re-elicitation), then drive the same path through FE-1423's pre-exposure gates and\n+FE-1441 deployment.\n+\n+FE-1393's generic Gherkin artifact and FE-1387's second-target contract freeze no longer gate the\n+September proof. FE-1402, FE-1403, FE-1406, and FE-1431 supply only the completion, guidance,\n+strategy, and contract slices the CPS `review-and-revise` runbook consumes. FE-1481 selects\n+YAML/Markdown export as the requirements-model inspection floor; broad UI follows only if the\n+closed loop is already proved.\n \n ```text\n legend:\n@@ -36,29 +40,30 @@ legend:\n \n nodes:\n FE-1437 [executed, landing] # history imported; HASH authoritative; PR pending\n- FE-1438 [next] # client-tool round-trip\n- FE-1439 [next, parallel] # private durable sessions\n- FE-1440 [join, partly landed] # website elicitor mode; panel wiring on import branch\n- FE-1441 [post-landing] # HASH deployment\n- FE-1393 [next] # plugin SDK + first projection\n- FE-1387 [after-FE-1393] # second pack + contract freeze\n- FE-1395 [coordination] # full affordance set\n- FE-1402 [parallel, content] # completion contract\n- FE-1403 [parallel, content] # interviewing guidance\n- FE-1404 [after-content] # armed baseline\n+ FE-1476 [objective] # September reviewer demo\n+ FE-1482 [next, semantic] # concrete CPS plugin + review/revise runbook\n+ FE-1480 [decision, semantic] # model/projection authority, then projector\n+ FE-1478 [semantic proof] # provenance through all three registers\n+ FE-1438 [next, experience] # machine client-tool round-trip + application\n+ FE-1439 [next, experience] # existing-target reviewer session ownership\n+ FE-1477/FE-1440 [experience] # one provider-routing implementation\n+ FE-1479 [join] # targeted correction changes the live net\n+ FE-1481 [fallback] # structured model export before UI\n+ FE-1441 [deployed proof] # HASH deployment\n \n edges:\n FE-1449 -[hard]-> FE-1438\n- FE-1392 -[hard]-> FE-1393\n FE-1438, FE-1439,\n FE-1437 -[hard]-> FE-1440\n FE-1437, FE-1439,\n FE-1423 -[hard]-> FE-1441\n- FE-1393 -[hard]-> FE-1387\n- FE-1402, FE-1403 -[hard]-> FE-1404\n- FE-1395 -[coord]-> FE-1438\n FE-1437 branch on main -[state-gate]-> FE-1438, FE-1439, FE-1393\n- FE-1387 -[input]-> FE-1440\n+ FE-1480 decision -[input]-> FE-1482, FE-1478\n+ FE-1402, FE-1403,\n+ FE-1406, FE-1431 -[input]-> FE-1482\n+ FE-1482, FE-1478,\n+ FE-1438, FE-1439 -[input]-> FE-1479\n+ FE-1479, FE-1440 -[input]-> FE-1441\n ```\n \n Hard-edge truth remains in Linear. The graph above is a deliberately focused recommendation,\n@@ -90,8 +95,18 @@ explicit approval from Lu.\n \n ## Open seams\n \n-- **Contract freeze — FE-1387.** The process-model target must stress the plugin contract before\n- it freezes. FE-1393 makes the contract programmable; FE-1387 remains the cross-map hinge.\n+- **Projection authority — FE-1480.** The ticket assumes non-deterministic LLM inference from the\n+ requirements model to SDCPN, while ADR-0003 requires write-time-only semantic inference and a\n+ pure projection. A worked CPS transformation must assign every judgment to capture, fold,\n+ projection, or document application before the interface freezes.\n+- **Controller and runbook.** The harness does not read the folded model or open issues back into\n+ the agent, and no plugin defines a job trajectory or stopping rule. FE-1482 must exercise the\n+ narrow `review-and-revise` loop; FE-1406 and FE-1402/FE-1403 are inputs, not parallel products.\n+- **Reviewer target identity — FE-1439 × FE-1479.** The current host derives target-document\n+ identity from conversation identity. September requires a new reviewer conversation against an\n+ existing target without weakening owner isolation.\n+- **Contract freeze — FE-1387.** The CPS target must stress the plugin contract before it freezes.\n+ The freeze follows the September semantic proof rather than gating it.\n - **Absence locator.** An absence capture carries no payload, but the fold needs a field-specific\n coordinate (anchor × slot). The plugin-contract spec records three worked cases; any envelope\n amendment belongs to the harness side of this seam.\n@@ -114,9 +129,17 @@ field. ADR-0003 keeps field-level structure below the capture's single epistemic\n \n These project issues intentionally have no parent and are roots under the registry rule:\n \n-- **FE-1331 — start elicitation from Petrinaut's create-new-net flow.** Deferred post-September\n- consumer topology; returns after in-Petrinaut staging proves itself.\n+- **FE-1331 — start elicitation from Petrinaut's create-new-net flow.** ADR-0004 un-deferred this as\n+ September topology, while FE-1476's new reviewer scenario starts from an existing target. Keep\n+ the conflict visible until Dora confirms the use case and the ADR is amended if necessary.\n - **FE-1334 — offer the user a surprising scenario of their model.** A validation gesture with\n no owning map yet; closest to the motif/quiver strategy work.\n - **FE-1406 — design reusable elicitation strategies.** The cross-map home for the\n harness-shipped generic strategy quiver; intentionally independent of either delivery map.\n+- **FE-1472 — evaluate the nested Anthropic SDK pin.** Unrelated triage root; no owning delivery\n+ map has been chosen.\n+- **FE-1476 — prepare the September demo.** Temporary delivery root pending the recommended fold\n+ under FE-1357.\n+- **FE-1477 through FE-1482 — September outcome slices.** PM-authored issues adopted by the\n+ steering model but not yet folded in Linear. The recommended parent is FE-1476; overlaps and\n+ ownership boundaries are recorded in STEERING's issue projection before external mutation.\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -## Assistant - -**Tool Use:** `apply_patch` - -```json -{ - "patchText": "*** Begin Patch\n*** Update File: /Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md\n@@\n- FE-1437 branch on main -[state-gate]-> FE-1438, FE-1439, FE-1393\n+ FE-1437 branch on main -[state-gate]-> FE-1438, FE-1439\n@@\n-These project issues intentionally have no parent and are roots under the registry rule:\n+These project issues currently have no parent. Some are intentional roots; the temporary or\n+unresolved roots are named here until their Linear parentage is settled:\n*** End Patch" -} -``` - -## User - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CekGiiRgw1pZ1J1qAGT` - -``` -{ - "files": [ - { - "uri": "file:///Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/%40hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md", - "diff": "Index: /Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md\n===================================================================\n--- /Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md\n+++ /Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md\n@@ -56,9 +56,9 @@\n FE-1438, FE-1439,\n FE-1437 -[hard]-> FE-1440\n FE-1437, FE-1439,\n FE-1423 -[hard]-> FE-1441\n- FE-1437 branch on main -[state-gate]-> FE-1438, FE-1439, FE-1393\n+ FE-1437 branch on main -[state-gate]-> FE-1438, FE-1439\n FE-1480 decision -[input]-> FE-1482, FE-1478\n FE-1402, FE-1403,\n FE-1406, FE-1431 -[input]-> FE-1482\n FE-1482, FE-1478,\n@@ -126,9 +126,10 @@\n field. ADR-0003 keeps field-level structure below the capture's single epistemic status.\n \n ## Exceptional roots\n \n-These project issues intentionally have no parent and are roots under the registry rule:\n+These project issues currently have no parent. Some are intentional roots; the temporary or\n+unresolved roots are named here until their Linear parentage is settled:\n \n - **FE-1331 — start elicitation from Petrinaut's create-new-net flow.** ADR-0004 un-deferred this as\n September topology, while FE-1476's new reviewer scenario starts from an existing target. Keep\n the conflict visible until Dora confirms the use case and the ADR is amended if necessary.\n", - "type": "update", - "additions": 3, - "deletions": 2 - } - ], - "summary": "update: /Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md (+3/-2)" -} -``` - -## Assistant - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "sed -n '44,74p' docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md; sed -n '120,155p' docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent", - "timeout_ms": 10000 -} -``` - -## User - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CekNwpeOY5YQMx9PhLB` - -``` -{ - "output": " FE-1482 [next, semantic] # concrete CPS plugin + review/revise runbook\n FE-1480 [decision, semantic] # model/projection authority, then projector\n FE-1478 [semantic proof] # provenance through all three registers\n FE-1438 [next, experience] # machine client-tool round-trip + application\n FE-1439 [next, experience] # existing-target reviewer session ownership\n FE-1477/FE-1440 [experience] # one provider-routing implementation\n FE-1479 [join] # targeted correction changes the live net\n FE-1481 [fallback] # structured model export before UI\n FE-1441 [deployed proof] # HASH deployment\n\nedges:\n FE-1449 -[hard]-> FE-1438\n FE-1438, FE-1439,\n FE-1437 -[hard]-> FE-1440\n FE-1437, FE-1439,\n FE-1423 -[hard]-> FE-1441\n FE-1437 branch on main -[state-gate]-> FE-1438, FE-1439\n FE-1480 decision -[input]-> FE-1482, FE-1478\n FE-1402, FE-1403,\n FE-1406, FE-1431 -[input]-> FE-1482\n FE-1482, FE-1478,\n FE-1438, FE-1439 -[input]-> FE-1479\n FE-1479, FE-1440 -[input]-> FE-1441\n```\n\nHard-edge truth remains in Linear. The graph above is a deliberately focused recommendation,\nnot a second issue database.\n\n## Repository handoff threshold\n\nFE-1437 (the monorepo import; [execution plan](./hash-monorepo-import-plan.md)) was the authority\n times.\n- **Living-prototype charter.** The deployed elicitor as a cumulative record of proved and\n unproved behavior remains pre-charter until the infrastructure conversation settles.\n\nSettled seam decisions still governing open work: FE-1392 established the plugin-declared\nverbatim proposal floor, and ask accounting remains a read-time relation rather than an envelope\nfield. ADR-0003 keeps field-level structure below the capture's single epistemic status.\n\n## Exceptional roots\n\nThese project issues currently have no parent. Some are intentional roots; the temporary or\nunresolved roots are named here until their Linear parentage is settled:\n\n- **FE-1331 — start elicitation from Petrinaut's create-new-net flow.** ADR-0004 un-deferred this as\n September topology, while FE-1476's new reviewer scenario starts from an existing target. Keep\n the conflict visible until Dora confirms the use case and the ADR is amended if necessary.\n- **FE-1334 — offer the user a surprising scenario of their model.** A validation gesture with\n no owning map yet; closest to the motif/quiver strategy work.\n- **FE-1406 — design reusable elicitation strategies.** The cross-map home for the\n harness-shipped generic strategy quiver; intentionally independent of either delivery map.\n- **FE-1472 — evaluate the nested Anthropic SDK pin.** Unrelated triage root; no owning delivery\n map has been chosen.\n- **FE-1476 — prepare the September demo.** Temporary delivery root pending the recommended fold\n under FE-1357.\n- **FE-1477 through FE-1482 — September outcome slices.** PM-authored issues adopted by the\n steering model but not yet folded in Linear. The recommended parent is FE-1476; overlaps and\n ownership boundaries are recorded in STEERING's issue projection before external mutation.\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -## Assistant - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "jq -r '.scripts | to_entries[] | select(.key|test(\"^(lint|test|build|fix:format)\")) | \"\\(.key)=\\(.value)\"' package.json | sed -n '1,160p'", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash", - "timeout_ms": 10000 -} -``` - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "yarn oxfmt --help | sed -n '1,180p'", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash", - "timeout_ms": 10000 -} -``` - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "git status --short; printf '%s\\n' '--- manifest'; git status --short -- libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/INDEX.md libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash", - "timeout_ms": 10000 -} -``` - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "find docs/inbox -maxdepth 1 -type f -not -name '.DS_Store' -not -name '.gitkeep' -print 2>/dev/null; printf '%s\\n' '--- spec ledger references to affected obligations'; rg -n \"FE-147|FE-148|CPS|projection|Petrinaut|plugin\" docs/planning/_shared/SPEC-LEDGER.md | head -100", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent", - "timeout_ms": 10000 -} -``` - -## User - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CekYfG1MyOTg5hrDmVz` - -``` -{ - "output": "fix:format=oxfmt --write\nlint=npm-run-all --continue-on-error \"lint:*\"\nlint:constraints=yarn constraints\nlint:eslint=CARGO_TERM_PROGRESS_WHEN=never turbo --continue=always lint:eslint --\nlint:format=oxfmt --check\nlint:license-in-workspaces=yarn workspace @local/repo-chores exe scripts/check-license-in-workspaces.ts\nlint:markdownlint=mise exec --env dev markdownlint-cli2 -- markdownlint-cli2\nlint:skill=yarn agents:skill-management validate\nlint:taplo=taplo fmt --check\nlint:tsc=mise run lint:tsc\nlint:yarn-deduplicate=yarn dedupe --strategy highest --check\ntest=npm-run-all --continue-on-error \"test:*\"\ntest:integration=CARGO_TERM_PROGRESS_WHEN=never turbo run test:integration --env-mode=loose --\ntest:playwright=CARGO_TERM_PROGRESS_WHEN=never turbo run test:integration --env-mode=loose --filter @tests/hash-playwright --\ntest:unit=CARGO_TERM_PROGRESS_WHEN=never turbo run test:unit --env-mode=loose --\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CekYg2JVLrzgKw7ueZr` - -``` -{ - "output": "Usage: [-c=PATH] [PATH]...\n\nMode Options:\n --init Initialize `.oxfmtrc.json` with default values\n --migrate=SOURCE Migrate configuration to `.oxfmtrc.json` from specified source\n Available sources: prettier, biome\n --lsp Start language server protocol (LSP) server\n --stdin-filepath=PATH Specify the file name to use to infer which parser to use\n\nOutput Options:\n --write Format and write files in place (default)\n --check Check if files are formatted, also show statistics\n --list-different List files that would be changed\n\nConfig Options\n -c, --config=PATH Path to the configuration file (.json, .jsonc, .ts, .mts, .cts, .js,\n .mjs, .cjs)\n --disable-nested-config Do not search for configuration files in subdirectories\n\nIgnore Options\n --ignore-path=PATH Path to ignore file(s). Can be specified multiple times. If not\n specified, .gitignore and .prettierignore in the current directory are\n used.\n --with-node-modules Format code in node_modules directory (skipped by default)\n\nRuntime Options\n --no-error-on-unmatched-pattern Do not exit with error when pattern is unmatched\n --threads=INT Number of threads to use. Set to 1 for using only 1 CPU core.\n\nAvailable positional items:\n PATH Single file, path or list of paths. Glob patterns are also supported.\n (Be sure to quote them, otherwise your shell may expand them before\n passing.) Exclude patterns with `!` prefix like `'!**/fixtures/*.js'`\n are also supported. If not provided, current working directory is used.\n\nAvailable options:\n -h, --help Prints help information\n -V, --version Prints version information\n\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CekYgQWoicWIdAeBogw` - -``` -{ - "output": " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/INDEX.md\n M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/git-workflow.md\n M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/issue-writing.md\n M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/legibility.md\n M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md\n M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/hash-monorepo-import-plan.md\n?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md\n--- manifest\n M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/INDEX.md\n M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md\n?? libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CekYgod3wfyc7qMtIAB` - -``` -{ - "output": "--- spec ledger references to affected obligations\n20:| Shell separation: plugins→core only; core imports no substrate; binding imports both | §4, §12.2 | **discharged** | boundary gates (FE-1388/FE-1399, `test/boundaries.test.ts`); `workspacePackages()` derives groups from manifest; `plugin-gherkin` imports `@brunch/core` only |\n21:| Package topology | §12.2 | **partial** | `core` (+`testing` subpath), `binding-flue`, `transport-aisdk`, `plugin-gherkin`, `apps/brunch-agent` exist; `plugin-assurance` pending. FE-1437 imported them to their native HASH destinations and preserved the existing dependency boundaries. Topology pin derives from §12.2 itself (FE-1400 `ef00201`); FE-1436 adds the transport-only dependency gate. |\n26:| Host-authored thin agent calling `useElicitation(plugin, session)` | §12.1 | **discharged** | `apps/brunch-agent/src/agents/gherkin-elicitor.ts`; FE-1392 adds host-owned immutable session/document and transport wiring |\n29:| Remote-parity constraints (pinned agentName, storage outside plugin, no dynamic agents) | §12.5 | **discharged** | pinned-identity gates (FE-1399/FE-1400); storage port in binding (FE-1390) |\n40:| Confidence qualitative, never a scalar | §5 | **partial** | non-empty string only; `\"0.93\"` accepted. Vocabulary is settled by the plugin-contract spec as `firm | hedged | speculative`; its proposed store refusal rule for numeric-parsing strings remains to implement |\n43:| One epistemic status per capture | §5 | **discharged**, with named friction | Status is the proposal union's discriminant, coupled to provenance shape — per-field status is unrepresentable, and payload-smuggling it breaks dedup identity. This was FE-1405's central input (deep-read FE-1390, tiering section); the arc consumed it _without_ amendment — one status per capture survives, and the structure that wanted per-field status lives below it in proposal interiors (ADR-0003, plugin-contract spec) |\n49:| `project` + typed loss report; `validate`; optional `reconcile`; purity (C2) | §6.1 | **pending** | FE-1392 adds only the plugin-declared `statement-noted` verbatim proposal floor; operations remain FE-1393 |\n52:| Duplicate detection free for flat-record plugins | §6.2 | **partial** | near-identical advisory fires for string payloads only; a flat record gets none |\n55:| Cadence as policy (§6.4) | §6.4 | **partial** | FE-1392 makes successful sweep the cadence boundary and keeps projection/validation read-time-only, leaving sweep outcome unchanged. Concrete operations remain absent until FE-1393 |\n90:| Only the true user's side is evidence; injected entries structurally non-user | §9.4 | **partial** | FE-1391 verifies role/purpose against the public projection, refuses signal/advisory text, and classifies affordance replies only from the harness-owned reply-binding signal. The kickoff remains a machine-authored `user` entry until FE-1420/FE-1385 move it to `useInitialData`; FE-1396 still owns briefing-never-evidence |\n92:| Storage port: harness-defined, binding-implemented, plugin-blind (C1) | §9.6 | **discharged for the local target** | core owns capture/archive/anchoring semantics; `binding-flue` owns the file implementation; plugins cannot import the binding (FE-1390 + FE-1391) |\n94:| Compaction vs. durable log | §9.7 | **partial — source-settled, behavioral pin open** | Flue 2.0.3's append-only stream contract and implementation show compaction appends a canonical record, rewrites only model context, preserves the public message projection, and leaves `state_write` reduction untouched. The source-read record reshapes FE-1386 to one upgrade pin; `test/open-gaps.ts` remains until behavioral proof lands |\n101:| Caps 6–8, incl. entry-projection read | §10 | **discharged** | FE-1391 supplies the public reader/archive. FE-1392 uses direct structured `harness.prompt` inside a durable tool whose peek/extract/refresh/apply boundaries use `step.do`; the mounted runtime pins same-response finish-hook steering and refresh-before-apply |\n107:| Plugin ownership: packs, forms, validators | §11.1 | **partial** | `plugin-gherkin` now owns its one FE-1392 proposal declaration/schema and target identity; packs, forms, validators, fold, and demand table remain FE-1393/FE-1387 work |\n109:| Smallest honest plugin as a standing bar | §11.3 | **partial** | `statement-noted.test.ts` and the core plugin fixture encode the one-type verbatim floor and reject undeclared parsed/pointer shape; the standing bar must grow with FE-1393's operations |\n122:| Invariants 3, 8 (projection loss, equivalent projection) | §14.1 | **pending** | no `project` exists |\n124:| Gating tests (reprojection, minimal pairs, black-box authoring) | §14.3 | **pending** | — |\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -## Assistant - -The reviewed plan now makes the production sweep itself part of “done”: the correction must originate in the reviewer’s utterance and become a real superseding capture. It also requires the prebuilt demo baseline to begin from valid source conversation/capture state, not a hand-authored model with decorative provenance. I’m moving through the package’s verification and control-surface closeout now. - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "yarn markdownlint-cli2 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/INDEX.md libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md && turbo run lint:eslint --filter '@hashintel/brunch-agent'", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash", - "timeout_ms": 60000 -} -``` - -## User - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CekpIOxnYwkta6op8sD` - -``` -{ - "output": "Usage Error: Couldn't find a script named \"markdownlint-cli2\".\n\n$ yarn run [--inspect] [--inspect-brk] [-T,--top-level] [-B,--binaries-only] [--require #0] ...\n", - "exitCode": 1 -} -``` - -## Assistant - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "mise exec --env dev markdownlint-cli2 -- markdownlint-cli2 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/INDEX.md libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md && turbo run lint:eslint --filter '@hashintel/brunch-agent'", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash", - "timeout_ms": 60000 -} -``` - -## User - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034Cel1wEvg9lhiTrj1jis` - -``` -{ - "output": "markdownlint-cli2 v0.22.1 (markdownlint v0.40.0)\nFinding: libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/INDEX.md libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md *.md **/*.md **/*.mdc !**/LICENSE*.md !**/AGENTS*.md !node_modules/** !target/** !**/_temp/** !**/_ai/** !**/.cursor/plans/** !libs/@hashintel/ds-components/** !libs/@hashintel/ds-helpers/** !libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/**\nLinting: 256 file(s)\nSummary: 0 error(s)\nturbo 2.6.3\n\n• Packages in scope: @hashintel/brunch-agent\n• Running lint:eslint in 1 packages\n• Remote caching disabled\n@local/eslint:build: cache miss, executing 721d5b9a378f6a70\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:lint:eslint: cache miss, executing 59f21353e1c3ce33\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:lint:eslint: Found 0 warnings and 0 errors.\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:lint:eslint: Finished in 651ms on 29 files with 110 rules using 16 threads.\n\n Tasks: 2 successful, 2 total\nCached: 0 cached, 2 total\n Time: 5.875s \n\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -## Assistant - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "yarn oxfmt --check libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/INDEX.md libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash", - "timeout_ms": 60000 -} -``` - -## User - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CelM4ZMYxG1P5RAJY93` - -``` -{ - "output": "(node:57738) [MODULE_TYPELESS_PACKAGE_JSON] Warning: Module type of file:///Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/oxfmt.config.ts?cache=1787567470038 is not specified and it doesn't parse as CommonJS.\nReparsing as ES module because module syntax was detected. This incurs a performance overhead.\nTo eliminate this warning, add \"type\": \"module\" to /Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/package.json.\n(Use `node --trace-warnings ...` to show where the warning was created)\nChecking formatting...\n\nExpected at least one target file. All matched files may have been excluded by ignore rules.\n", - "exitCode": 2 -} -``` - -## Assistant - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "yarn bin prettier || true; yarn bin markdownlint-cli2 || true; rg -n \"brunch-agent/docs|\\.md\" oxfmt.config.ts .prettierignore 2>/dev/null | head -80", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash", - "timeout_ms": 10000 -} -``` - -## User - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CelVd9SekIht8fTjx82` - -``` -{ - "output": "Usage Error: Couldn't find a binary named \"prettier\" for package \"hash@workspace:.\"\n\n$ yarn bin [-v,--verbose] [--json] [name]\nUsage Error: Couldn't find a binary named \"markdownlint-cli2\" for package \"hash@workspace:.\"\n\n$ yarn bin [-v,--verbose] [--json] [name]\noxfmt.config.ts:61: \"**/LICENSE*.md\",\noxfmt.config.ts:64: \"libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/**\",\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -## Assistant - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "turbo run lint:tsc --filter '@hashintel/brunch-agent'", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash", - "timeout_ms": 60000 -} -``` - -## User - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034Celf5ywUscVmI5cF36u` - -``` -{ - "output": "turbo 2.6.3\n\n• Packages in scope: @hashintel/brunch-agent\n• Running lint:tsc in 1 packages\n• Remote caching disabled\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:lint:tsc: cache miss, executing 50584d5be80cc7ec\n\n Tasks: 1 successful, 1 total\nCached: 0 cached, 1 total\n Time: 2.681s \n\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -## Assistant - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "turbo run test:unit --filter '@hashintel/brunch-agent'", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash", - "timeout_ms": 60000 -} -``` - -## User - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CelqMiYvo5Mj62t4N5A` - -``` -{ - "output": "turbo 2.6.3\n\n• Packages in scope: @hashintel/brunch-agent\n• Running test:unit in 1 packages\n• Remote caching disabled\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:test:unit: cache miss, executing d4c5393b6af87011\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:test:unit: \n@hashintel/brunch-agent:test:unit: RUN v4.1.10 /Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/packages/core\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:test:unit: \n@hashintel/brunch-agent:test:unit: ✓ test/architecture/boundaries.test.ts (29 tests) 33ms\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:test:unit: ✓ test/naming.test.ts (11 tests) 3ms\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:test:unit: ✓ test/capture-store.test.ts (24 tests) 21ms\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:test:unit: ✓ test/anchoring.test.ts (6 tests) 4ms\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:test:unit: ✓ test/session-log.test.ts (4 tests) 8ms\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:test:unit: ✓ test/sweep-protocol.test.ts (9 tests) 3ms\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:test:unit: ✓ test/architecture/workspace.test.ts (7 tests) 3ms\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:test:unit: ✓ test/architecture/linear-project-graph.test.ts (2 tests) 14ms\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:test:unit: ✓ test/architecture/docs-index.test.ts (7 tests) 12ms\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:test:unit: ✓ test/ask-protocol.test.ts (9 tests) 2ms\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:test:unit: stderr | test/architecture/open-gaps.test.ts\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:test:unit: \n@hashintel/brunch-agent:test:unit: ⚠ 3 verification gaps are open (spec §14.5 and friends):\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:test:unit: · restart-durability — FE-1396 (spec §14.5)\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:test:unit: · compaction-vs-durable-history — FE-1386 (spec §9.7, §14.5)\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:test:unit: · interpretation-render-plugin-seam — FE-1394 (spec §7.6, §14.5)\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:test:unit: Closing one means deleting its entry in the commit that lands its proof.\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:test:unit: \n@hashintel/brunch-agent:test:unit: \n@hashintel/brunch-agent:test:unit: ✓ test/architecture/open-gaps.test.ts (2 tests) 1ms\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:test:unit: ✓ test/architecture/baseline-runner.test.ts (4 tests) 1867ms\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:test:unit: ✓ checkpoints a truncated expert reply and stops before another interviewer call 756ms\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:test:unit: ✓ resume regenerates a trailing truncated expert reply before continuing 636ms\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:test:unit: ✓ continues a truncated final delivery without sending checkpoint metadata 311ms\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:test:unit: \n@hashintel/brunch-agent:test:unit: Test Files 12 passed (12)\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:test:unit: Tests 114 passed (114)\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:test:unit: Start at 12:31:31\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:test:unit: Duration 2.08s (transform 76ms, setup 0ms, import 155ms, tests 1.97s, environment 0ms)\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:test:unit: \n\n Tasks: 1 successful, 1 total\nCached: 0 cached, 1 total\n Time: 4.748s \n\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -## Assistant - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "turbo run build --filter '@hashintel/brunch-agent'", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash", - "timeout_ms": 60000 -} -``` - -## User - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034Cem7UfNqOgfA1Uva9tF` - -``` -{ - "output": "turbo 2.6.3\n\n• Packages in scope: @hashintel/brunch-agent\n• Running build in 1 packages\n• Remote caching disabled\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:build: cache bypass, force executing d9f7ac2bc077ccba\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:build: vite v8.1.0 building client environment for production...\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:build: \u001b[2K\r@hashintel/brunch-agent:build: transforming...✓ 13 modules transformed.\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:build: rendering chunks...\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:build: computing gzip size...\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:build: dist/client-tools.js 0.12 kB │ gzip: 0.12 kB\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:build: dist/storage.js 0.20 kB │ gzip: 0.15 kB\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:build: dist/plugin-BlyisbcK.js 0.68 kB │ gzip: 0.41 kB │ map: 3.09 kB\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:build: dist/testing/index.js 0.69 kB │ gzip: 0.41 kB │ map: 2.13 kB\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:build: dist/naming-DhqH8ada.js 0.78 kB │ gzip: 0.48 kB │ map: 4.29 kB\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:build: dist/session-log-1mbM2HlS.js 6.44 kB │ gzip: 2.22 kB │ map: 20.44 kB\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:build: dist/index.js 25.31 kB │ gzip: 7.67 kB │ map: 80.29 kB\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:build: \n@hashintel/brunch-agent:build: ✓ built in 23ms\n\n Tasks: 1 successful, 1 total\nCached: 0 cached, 1 total\n Time: 2.689s \n\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -## Assistant - -**Tool Use:** `skill` - -```json -{ - "name": "arc-close", - "arguments": "Close the steering-model control-surface arc. Manifest: docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md, docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md, docs/INDEX.md. Do not mutate Linear or unrelated worktree files." -} -``` - -## User - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CemKIXqnng601WefzlI` - -``` -{ - "content": [ - { - "text": "\n# arc-close Skill\n\n\nRead `docs/agents/arc-close.md` from the Brunch context root and execute its five steps in order.\nThis wrapper carries no duplicate procedure. Report the required checks and whether each\nconditional control surface changed; never persist a no-op evaluation.\n\n\nARGUMENTS: Close the steering-model control-surface arc. Manifest: docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md, docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md, docs/INDEX.md. Do not mutate Linear or unrelated worktree files.\n\nBase directory for this skill: file:///Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/%40hashintel/brunch-agent/.agents/skills/arc-close\nRelative paths in this skill (e.g., scripts/, reference/) are relative to this base directory.\n", - "type": "text" - } - ] -} -``` - -## Assistant - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "turbo run linear:graph --filter '@hashintel/brunch-agent' 2>/dev/null | sed -n '/project brunch-agent/,$p'", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash", - "timeout_ms": 60000 -} -``` - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "git diff --check -- libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/INDEX.md libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md; if rg -n '[[:blank:]]+$' libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md; then exit 1; fi; printf '%s\\n' 'no whitespace errors'", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash", - "timeout_ms": 10000 -} -``` - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "printf '%s\\n' '--- inbox'; find docs/inbox -maxdepth 1 -type f -not -name '.DS_Store' -not -name '.gitkeep' -print 2>/dev/null; printf '%s\\n' '--- manifest status'; git status --short -- docs/INDEX.md docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md; printf '%s\\n' '--- unrelated status retained'; git status --short -- docs/agents/git-workflow.md docs/agents/issue-writing.md docs/agents/legibility.md docs/planning/_shared/hash-monorepo-import-plan.md", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent", - "timeout_ms": 10000 -} -``` - -## User - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CemaoZZtzEmqq2jtwmT` - -``` -{ - "output": "@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: project brunch-agent open=35 hard=16\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: legend: L=hard-dependency layer; p=parent; <=blocked by; =>blocks; *=outside project\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L0 FE-1331 [Todo root] | Start elicitation from Petrinaut's create-new-net flow\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L0 FE-1334 [Todo root] | Offer user a surprising scenario of their model\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L0 FE-1357 [In progress root] | Plan the September elicitation demo and plugin specification\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L0 FE-1383 [In progress root] | Build the first complete elicitation interview\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L0 FE-1386 [Backlog p:FE-1383] | Test durable history across transcript compaction\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L0 FE-1393 [Todo p:FE-1383] =>FE-1384,FE-1387,FE-1394 | Produce the first Gherkin artifact through the plugin SDK\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L0 FE-1395 [Todo p:FE-1383] =>FE-1385 | Add choices, questionnaires, and explicit absence replies\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L0 FE-1402 [Next up p:FE-1357] =>FE-1404 | Define and rehearse the elicitation completion contract\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L0 FE-1403 [Next up p:FE-1357] =>FE-1404 | Assemble and test the CPS interview guidance\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L0 FE-1406 [Next up root] | Design reusable elicitation strategies\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L0 FE-1407 [Next up p:FE-1357] | Catalogue elicitor failures that published measures miss\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L0 FE-1420 [Next up p:FE-1383] | Make affordance handling safe under retries and abandonment\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L0 FE-1431 [Todo p:FE-1357] | Define declarative plugin authoring\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L0 FE-1437 [Ready for review p:FE-1433] =>FE-1440,FE-1441 | Move brunch-agent into hashintel/hash with its history\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L0 FE-1438 [Todo p:FE-1433] =>FE-1440 | Build and repair Petrinaut nets through client tools\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L0 FE-1439 [Todo p:FE-1433] =>FE-1440,FE-1441 | Keep elicitation sessions private and durable per browser\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L0 FE-1448 [Ready for review p:FE-1433] | Let Petrinaut hosts render interactive chat tools\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L0 FE-1472 [Triage root] | Evaluate the cost of pinning bedrock-sdk's nested Anthropic SDK\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L0 FE-1476 [Todo root] | Prepare September demo\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L0 FE-1477 [Next up root] | Define the routing logic between Petrinaut AI and the brunch elicitor\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L0 FE-1478 [Todo root] | Provide provenance from a generated net back to the requirements graph\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L0 FE-1479 [Todo root] | Update a section of the net through targeted re-elicitation\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L0 FE-1480 [Todo root] | Infer requirements graph to SDCPN in Petrinaut editor\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L0 FE-1481 [Todo root] | Show the requirements graph in UI OR export as YAML or Markdown\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L0 FE-1482 [Next up root] | Add Cyber-physical process modelling plugin to brunch agent\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L1 FE-1384 [Backlog p:FE-1383] <=FE-1393 | Generate replay tests for the harness rules\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L1 FE-1387 [Backlog p:FE-1383] <=FE-1393 | Choose a second target and stabilize the plugin interface\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L1 FE-1394 [Todo p:FE-1383] <=FE-1393 =>FE-1385,FE-1396 | Preserve conflicts until the user resolves them\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L1 FE-1404 [Next up p:FE-1357] <=FE-1402,FE-1403 | Run the third baseline with completion and interview guidance\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L1 FE-1440 [Todo p:FE-1433] <=FE-1437,FE-1438,FE-1439 =>FE-1442 | Ship the elicitor in demo.petrinaut.org’s chat panel\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L2 FE-1385 [Backlog p:FE-1383] <=FE-1394,FE-1395 | Expand the dev app into a target gallery and diagnostic view\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L2 FE-1396 [Todo p:FE-1383] <=FE-1394 =>FE-1423 | Restore interview context after resume and restart\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L2 FE-1442 [Todo p:FE-1433] <=FE-1440 | Show live captures and completion accounting in the demo\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L3 FE-1423 [Todo p:FE-1357] <=FE-1396 =>FE-1441 | Require safe remote access to the elicitor server\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: L4 FE-1441 [Todo p:FE-1433] <=FE-1423,FE-1437,FE-1439 | Deploy the elicitor server behind the remote-release checks\n@hashintel/brunch-agent:linear:graph: cycles: none\n\n Tasks: 1 successful, 1 total\nCached: 0 cached, 1 total\n Time: 3.73s \n\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034Cemap9xVYDSej2U9SVL` - -``` -{ - "output": "no whitespace errors\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034Cemape2wKP2Oug8G2WK` - -``` -{ - "output": "--- inbox\n--- manifest status\n M docs/INDEX.md\n M docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md\n?? docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md\n--- unrelated status retained\n M docs/agents/git-workflow.md\n M docs/agents/issue-writing.md\n M docs/agents/legibility.md\n M docs/planning/_shared/hash-monorepo-import-plan.md\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -## Assistant - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "git add libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/INDEX.md libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md && git status --short && printf '%s\\n' '--- staged paths' && git diff --cached --name-only", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash", - "timeout_ms": 10000 -} -``` - -## User - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034Cemxbk8eOgW09TrYLmd` - -``` -{ - "output": "M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/INDEX.md\n M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/git-workflow.md\n M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/issue-writing.md\n M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/legibility.md\nM libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md\nA libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md\n M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/hash-monorepo-import-plan.md\n--- staged paths\nlibs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/INDEX.md\nlibs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md\nlibs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -## Assistant - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "git diff --cached --check && git diff --cached --stat && git commit -m \"Add September steering model\"", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash", - "timeout_ms": 60000 -} -``` - -## User - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CenBB5thhw0PWVBUWVn` - -``` -{ - "output": " libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/INDEX.md | 1 +\n .../docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md | 98 ++++---\n .../brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md | 296 +++++++++++++++++++++\n 3 files changed, 358 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)\n╭──────────────────────────────────────╮\n│ 🥊 lefthook v2.0.0 hook: pre-commit │\n╰──────────────────────────────────────╯\n│ yarn (skip) no matching staged files\n│ toml (skip) no files for inspection\n│ sqlfluff (skip) no files for inspection\n│ rust (skip) no files for inspection\n┃ oxfmt ❯ \n\n(node:65832) [MODULE_TYPELESS_PACKAGE_JSON] Warning: Module type of file:///Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/oxfmt.config.ts?cache=1787567541808 is not specified and it doesn't parse as CommonJS.\r\nReparsing as ES module because module syntax was detected. This incurs a performance overhead.\r\nTo eliminate this warning, add \"type\": \"module\" to /Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/package.json.\r\n(Use `node --trace-warnings ...` to show where the warning was created)\r\nExpected at least one target file. All matched files may have been excluded by ignore rules.\r\n\n┃ markdownlint ❯ \n\nmarkdownlint-cli2 v0.22.1 (markdownlint v0.40.0)\r\nFinding: libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/INDEX.md libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md !**/LICENSE*.md !**/AGENTS*.md !node_modules/** !target/** !**/_temp/** !**/_ai/** !**/.cursor/plans/** !libs/@hashintel/ds-components/** !libs/@hashintel/ds-helpers/** !libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/**\r\nLinting: 0 file(s)\r\nSummary: 0 error(s)\r\n\n \n ────────────────────────────────────\nsummary: (done in 0.93 seconds) \n✔️ oxfmt (0.40 seconds)\n✔️ markdownlint (0.85 seconds)\n[ln/fe-xxxx-whats-next d4e61bb23b] Add September steering model\n 3 files changed, 358 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)\n create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -## Assistant - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "git status --short; git show --stat --oneline --summary HEAD", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash", - "timeout_ms": 10000 -} -``` - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "git show --format= --name-only HEAD; git show --format= --check HEAD", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash", - "timeout_ms": 10000 -} -``` - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "nl -ba docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md | sed -n '1,330p' | tail -20; nl -ba docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md | sed -n '1,170p' | tail -45", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent", - "timeout_ms": 10000 -} -``` - -## User - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CenRkjCL9VDpfTx9Umd` - -``` -{ - "output": " M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/git-workflow.md\n M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/issue-writing.md\n M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/agents/legibility.md\n M libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/hash-monorepo-import-plan.md\nd4e61bb23b Add September steering model\n libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/INDEX.md | 1 +\n .../docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md | 98 ++++---\n .../brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md | 296 +++++++++++++++++++++\n 3 files changed, 358 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)\n create mode 100644 libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CenRl7UIjQsnLZeIYR3` - -``` -{ - "output": "libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/INDEX.md\nlibs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md\nlibs/@hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CenRltj53l8AQQst4wC` - -``` -{ - "output": " 277\t| A bounded review-and-revise scenario can carry the September product claim without cold-start elicitation. | Medium. It is the written FE-1476 scenario, but Dora has not confirmed the use case. | The confirmed use case requires model creation rather than review, or the optimisation handoff requires fields absent from the fixture. |\n 278\t| A concrete CPS implementation will discover a better minimum plugin contract faster than completing the generic design first. | Medium-high. Gherkin deliberately under-stresses the interface; CPS is the first real consumer. | The first worked CPS transformation cannot be expressed without a reusable harness primitive that must precede it. Build that primitive, then return immediately to the vertical proof. |\n 279\t| Register 2 can be rich enough for pure SDCPN projection. | Low-medium. ADR-0003 requires it, but no real fold or projector exists and FE-1480 asserts non-determinism. | The worked transformation identifies an unavoidable semantic choice not represented in captures/model. Record it earlier or explicitly revisit the ADR. |\n 280\t| Three to five turns can produce a meaningful scoped correction. | Low. No CPS runbook has been rehearsed. | Two rehearsals exceed the budget or require unrelated context. Narrow the region, preload explicit context, or revise the demo claim rather than script fake success. |\n 281\t| The proven ask suspension can extend to document-application client tools. | Medium-low. The suspension spike succeeded, but the production transport intentionally refuses machine tool-result follow-ups. | The first tool round-trip cannot preserve correlation, durability, or non-user evidence semantics. Treat this as a critical integration blocker, not a UI detail. |\n 282\t| The production website and remote server can be joined inside the timebox. | Medium-low. Local host seams exist; provider routing, session ownership, deployment, and release gates do not yet converge. | A deployable path is not proved by the end of Frontier 2. Preserve the real semantic loop and seek an explicit demo-surface decision rather than quietly falling back to test-only wiring. |\n 283\t| Requirements-model UI is unnecessary for comprehension. | Medium. The reviewer needs inspectability, but FE-1481 explicitly permits export. | Rehearsal shows that provenance and delta cannot be understood from chat plus a structured export. |\n 284\t\n 285\t## Current choice\n 286\t\n 287\tStop treating “unblocked” as “next.” The next strategic move is to run Frontier 0 immediately and\n 288\topen Frontiers 1 and 2 in parallel: one worked CPS semantic slice and one existing-target reviewer\n 289\tsession/tool-return slice. Join them at the earliest correction, then drive the same bones through\n 290\tprovider routing and deployment. The generic Gherkin/plugin-freeze path and broad UI work wait for\n 291\tthat join.\n 292\t\n 293\tRevisit this choice as soon as Dora confirms the use case, the FE-1480 worked transformation lands,\n 294\tor either parallel frontier fails its first proof. A steering pass that only updates ticket status\n 295\tdoes not change this document; a new fact that changes the objective, proof spine, authority\n 296\tboundary, or cut line does.\n 102\t- **Controller and runbook.** The harness does not read the folded model or open issues back into\n 103\t the agent, and no plugin defines a job trajectory or stopping rule. FE-1482 must exercise the\n 104\t narrow `review-and-revise` loop; FE-1406 and FE-1402/FE-1403 are inputs, not parallel products.\n 105\t- **Reviewer target identity — FE-1439 × FE-1479.** The current host derives target-document\n 106\t identity from conversation identity. September requires a new reviewer conversation against an\n 107\t existing target without weakening owner isolation.\n 108\t- **Contract freeze — FE-1387.** The CPS target must stress the plugin contract before it freezes.\n 109\t The freeze follows the September semantic proof rather than gating it.\n 110\t- **Absence locator.** An absence capture carries no payload, but the fold needs a field-specific\n 111\t coordinate (anchor × slot). The plugin-contract spec records three worked cases; any envelope\n 112\t amendment belongs to the harness side of this seam.\n 113\t- **Structured-tap evidence — FE-1395 × capture store.** `resolve-conflict` currently rejects\n 114\t `user-affordance-payload` evidence. FE-1395 must decide the transport fact before the store\n 115\t rule can settle.\n 116\t- **Guidance placement — FE-1403 × FE-1406.** Plugin cards and the harness-shipped generic\n 117\t strategy quiver share authoring methods but not ownership. Packages export; hosts register.\n 118\t- **Telemetry vocabulary — FE-1385 × FE-1404 × FE-1423.** The probe surface, experiment\n 119\t accounting, and remote telemetry should share span vocabulary rather than invent it three\n 120\t times.\n 121\t- **Living-prototype charter.** The deployed elicitor as a cumulative record of proved and\n 122\t unproved behavior remains pre-charter until the infrastructure conversation settles.\n 123\t\n 124\tSettled seam decisions still governing open work: FE-1392 established the plugin-declared\n 125\tverbatim proposal floor, and ask accounting remains a read-time relation rather than an envelope\n 126\tfield. ADR-0003 keeps field-level structure below the capture's single epistemic status.\n 127\t\n 128\t## Exceptional roots\n 129\t\n 130\tThese project issues currently have no parent. Some are intentional roots; the temporary or\n 131\tunresolved roots are named here until their Linear parentage is settled:\n 132\t\n 133\t- **FE-1331 — start elicitation from Petrinaut's create-new-net flow.** ADR-0004 un-deferred this as\n 134\t September topology, while FE-1476's new reviewer scenario starts from an existing target. Keep\n 135\t the conflict visible until Dora confirms the use case and the ADR is amended if necessary.\n 136\t- **FE-1334 — offer the user a surprising scenario of their model.** A validation gesture with\n 137\t no owning map yet; closest to the motif/quiver strategy work.\n 138\t- **FE-1406 — design reusable elicitation strategies.** The cross-map home for the\n 139\t harness-shipped generic strategy quiver; intentionally independent of either delivery map.\n 140\t- **FE-1472 — evaluate the nested Anthropic SDK pin.** Unrelated triage root; no owning delivery\n 141\t map has been chosen.\n 142\t- **FE-1476 — prepare the September demo.** Temporary delivery root pending the recommended fold\n 143\t under FE-1357.\n 144\t- **FE-1477 through FE-1482 — September outcome slices.** PM-authored issues adopted by the\n 145\t steering model but not yet folded in Linear. The recommended parent is FE-1476; overlaps and\n 146\t ownership boundaries are recorded in STEERING's issue projection before external mutation.\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -## Assistant - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "rg -n '^## |^### ' docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md; rg -n '^## |^### ' docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md; rg -n '\\[STEERING\\]' docs/INDEX.md", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent", - "timeout_ms": 10000 -} -``` - -## User - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CenaJhj5wq8tcm8LEb5` - -``` -{ - "output": "21:## The September outcome\n58:## Where the system actually stands\n82:## The strategic bet\n114:## The elicitor architecture under this load\n160:## Proof frontiers and execution order\n166:### Frontier 0 — make the demo claim decidable\n182:### Frontier 1 — close the CPS semantic loop\n195:### Frontier 2 — close the reviewer control loop\n212:### Frontier 3 — converge on the deployed demo\n222:## What is deliberately cut\n239:## Issue projection\n273:## Beliefs, risks, and replan conditions\n285:## Current choice\n15:## Current sequencing recommendation\n72:## Repository handoff threshold\n96:## Open seams\n128:## Exceptional roots\n74:| [STEERING](planning/_shared/STEERING.md) | active | FE-1357 / FE-1476 | Current objective-driven strategy for the September CPS review-and-revise proof: evidence, architectural pressure, proof frontiers, cuts, issue projection, risks, and replan conditions |\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -## Assistant - -Created and committed the [Brunch steering model](file:///Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/%40hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/STEERING.md#L1-L296), including: - -- September objective, architecture inventory, strategic bet, proof frontiers, cuts, risks, and issue projection. -- Updated [coordination sequencing](file:///Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/%40hashintel/brunch-agent/docs/planning/_shared/COORDINATION.md#L15-L69). -- Oracle-reviewed acceptance criteria preventing fake provenance or hand-inserted corrections. -- Explicit FE-1480/ADR-0003 and FE-1331/ADR-0004 conflicts. - -No Linear changes were made. Verification passed: lint, type-check, 114 tests, build, documentation index/link gates. - -Commit: `d4e61bb23b` (`Add September steering model`) - -The next substantive discussion should be Frontier 0: the CPS fixture and FE-1480 authority boundary. - -## User - -OK this is very helpful. A few thoughts: - -- a more compact overview, in nested bullet-list or perhaps tree form, collecting issues to the frontiers they support, and calling out where more issues might need to be mapped, would be helpful -- the proof obligations list must also call out legibility: a proof without a legible surface, and ideally a human witness, is the proverbial tree that falls in the forest with nobody around to hear it. This is the legibility protocol, which I need in order to maintain my shared understanding -- your confidence assignments in the "beliefs..." table are mostly what I would assign as well; I would say my low-confidence hovers around the following two cuts that you made, mainly because I'm not confident that belief row 1 will hold, i.e. we will not be asked to show a cold-start elicitation - -> - Do not build a complete cold-start CPS interview, general target gallery, every affordance type, voice input, surprising-scenario generation, or broad telemetry vocabulary. -> - Do not implement a comprehensive CPS ontology. Support the fixture, the correction, and the optimisation handoff while keeping the data model honest about what it omits. - -Let's talk about Frontier 0 next. (ASIDE: we have an unclear topology of planning docs now, in terms of canonicality, order-of-reading, authority, scope; and we have several documents which are effectively stale and should move to `docs/_archive/` or be deleted - -## Assistant - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "cat docs/agents/legibility.md", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent", - "timeout_ms": 10000 -} -``` - -## User - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CfkNUto2uMtzB5jmd3F` - -``` -{ - "output": "# Legibility protocol: render, read the strain, reconcile\n\nHow work arcs with significant agent-generated output close: produce legibility artifacts that\naid review and re-establish shared understanding between the humans and the agents carrying the\nwork. Companion to `documentation.md` (which governs where documents live; this file governs\nhow understanding is checked and kept).\n\nThe protocol serves one thesis, the same one the CI gates and the capture store serve in code:\n**no claim without a way for it to fail.** A document read in its own register can nod along\nwith itself; re-rendered into a different register, every claim must survive translation, and\nthe places where it doesn't are findings.\n\n## The move: render and read the strain\n\nAt the close of an arc, re-render its central artifact into another register and instruct the\nrenderer to report **every place the source resisted plain rendering** — a dangling referent, a\nterm defined nowhere, a prohibition citing nothing, a causal claim whose causality had to be\ninferred. The strain report _is_ the review yield; the rendering itself is a byproduct (often a\nuseful one — a teammate-readable account).\n\nRun renderings as fork subagents carrying the strain-report instruction, so the main thread\nreviews the findings instead of doing the translation. Instrumenting the collection raises the\nyield: the ir-design plain rendering returned seven strain points where an uninstrumented\nround-2 read of the FE-1374 spec renderings had found four by accident (each of which fed a\nreal spec change — the practice predates its name).\n\n## The register dial\n\nThe register is a dial, not a single target. One practice, several grades — pick the cheapest\ngrade that can still fail:\n\n- **Plain prose** (Google/GOV.UK style): the default. Catches undefined terms, uncited rules,\n compressed allusions.\n- **STE grade** (controlled vocabulary, one instruction per sentence): for sources whose claims\n are dense or load-bearing enough that plain prose can still paper over them. Costs more;\n earns it when the source will govern implementation.\n- **Worked examples** (FE-1397's form): re-render a _definition_ into concrete instances and\n check what breaks. The strongest grade for type systems and contracts — a definition that\n survives three worked designs at different thicknesses has been tested, not admired.\n\n## Filings are render-and-read material too\n\nA sweep's own capture — its tickets, its accrual comments, its penciled directions — is itself\na rendering of the session's understanding, and gets the same treatment: expect a challenge\npass over the filings before the arc closes. The FE-1405/FE-1406 round came from re-reading the\nfirst round's own text (\"shapes-to-fill\" quoted back); the gaps were real and had been deepened\nby the filings meant to close them.\n\n## Point findings may reveal a recurrent class\n\nA point finding is evidence of a possible fault class, not proof that the whole codebase shares\nit. Promote the finding to an audit only when recurrence is plausible, the class is cheaply\nsearchable, and missed instances could fail silently. Search both the mechanical family and the\nownership boundaries where the same contract may be reimplemented. Keep finding and fixing as\nseparate steps so a human can confirm the class and scope before repair begins.\n\nWhen the class is confirmed, make its categorical part executable as a boundary or regression\ncheck. Put any judgment that cannot be mechanized into review guidance. Do not widen a one-off\nfinding into a repository sweep merely for symmetry.\n\n## Consolidation: capture-as-we-go, reconcile-before-landing\n\nCapture channels (accrual comments, pencil lists, strain appendices, handoffs) guard against\nevaporation, not fragmentation. Two rules keep the yield coherent:\n\n- **Every capture channel names its consolidation target** — accruals reconcile into the\n owning control surface, pencils graduate to issues or planning documents, and strain reports\n become document fixes. A channel with no named target is a leak with a delay.\n- **An arc is not closed until consolidation runs.** The closing step reconciles what the\n captures established into the durable artifacts (coordination, ledger, docs, issues) — a\n handoff note alone is a deferral, not a deposit.\n\n## Deposit: work describes itself at authoring time\n\nProse backfill is remediation, not workflow. A branch's commit message and PR body carry its\nsemantics when it lands — the record must not abstain exactly where description is most needed\n(FE-1390 landed 1,392 lines with an empty body; the deep-read that repaired it cost more than\nwriting it at authoring time would have). The same rule for tooling: a skill output written\ninto `docs/` passes through the documentation protocol — an `INDEX.md` row or an `AGENTS.md`\npointer — like any other document.\n\nReflections belong in work products, marked as `> **Reflection:**` blockquotes, distinct from\nthe captured facts — insight left only in chat evaporates with the context that produced it.\n", - "exitCode": 0 -} -``` - -## Assistant - -Agreed on all three adjustments. - -The two cuts should become **conditional bets**, not commitments: - -- Default to review-and-revise until Frontier 0 confirms whether cold-start is a demo obligation. -- Build a **minimum coherent CPS semantic closure**, not merely a fixture-shaped subset. It must support the demo, provenance, correction, completion, and optimisation handoff while explicitly inventorying omissions. - -A compact frontier map could look like: - -```text -FE-1476 September outcome -├─ Frontier 0 — make the claim decidable -│ ├─ FE-1480 projection-authority decision -│ ├─ FE-1478 provenance acceptance criteria -│ ├─ FE-1482 CPS semantic scope -│ ├─ FE-1402 completion criteria -│ ├─ FE-1331 cold-start conflict -│ └─ Missing mappings -│ ├─ confirmed demo claim/use case -│ ├─ valid source/capture fixture -│ ├─ optimisation handoff contract -│ └─ witnessed worked-example review -│ -├─ Frontier 1 — CPS semantic loop -│ ├─ FE-1482 CPS plugin -│ ├─ FE-1480 SDCPN projection -│ ├─ FE-1478 provenance -│ ├─ FE-1481 structured legibility surface -│ ├─ FE-1402 completion input -│ ├─ FE-1431 plugin-contract input -│ └─ Missing mappings -│ ├─ active-model/issues read path -│ └─ CPS semantic-coverage oracle -│ -├─ Frontier 2 — reviewer control loop -│ ├─ FE-1479 targeted re-elicitation -│ ├─ FE-1438 client-tool return/application -│ ├─ FE-1439 existing-target session identity -│ ├─ FE-1394 supersession/conflict behavior -│ ├─ FE-1403 / FE-1406 guidance and strategies -│ └─ Missing mappings -│ ├─ controller implementation -│ ├─ review-and-revise runbook -│ └─ selected-region identity -│ -└─ Frontier 3 — deployed witnessed proof - ├─ FE-1477 / FE-1440 routing and website integration - ├─ FE-1423 exposure gates - ├─ FE-1441 deployment - ├─ FE-1476 rehearsal and acceptance - └─ Missing mappings - ├─ optimisation-flow integration - └─ witnessed demo/legibility deposit -``` - -Each frontier’s proof should become a three-part bundle: - -1. **Executable evidence** — the behavior succeeds and can fail honestly. -2. **Legible rendering** — translate it into another register and record the strain. -3. **Human witness and deposit** — a named person reviews it; findings reconcile into the governing artifact. - -For example, Frontier 1 is not proved merely because projection tests pass. A human must be able to follow: - -```text -utterance → capture → model field → SDCPN element -``` - -…and understand the before/after correction without reading implementation code. - -For Frontier 0, I suggest four decisions: - -1. **What claim must the demo support?** - - Review/revise only - - Bootstrap one bounded region from cold start - - Elicit an entire model from cold start - -2. **What semantic closure is necessary?** - - Every demonstrated net construct has a model/capture source. - - Every runbook demand has a representable slot or issue. - - Optimisation inputs are represented. - - Omitted CPS concepts and their consequences are legible. - -3. **Where does inference belong?** - Work one concrete capture → model → SDCPN transformation and allocate every judgment to capture, fold, projection, or application. - -4. **Who witnesses it?** - Ideally you for architectural legibility, Dora for the product claim, and Chris/Yannis for the optimisation handoff. - -My first question is therefore: **what is the strongest cold-start claim you think stakeholders may expect—one bounded region, a recognisable partial model, or the complete process?** - -On the planning-doc aside: agreed. We need scoped authority rather than a single total order: - -```text -How we work AGENTS + protocols -Settled truth CONTEXT + ADRs + active specs -What matters now STEERING -What runs next COORDINATION + Linear -Why we believe it planning/reference records -``` - -Several records currently blur those roles. After Frontier 0, I’d run a separate inventory that classifies each document as current authority, supporting evidence, historical record, superseded/archive, or deletable—with link and Linear-reference repair before moving anything. - -## User - -Good. That kind of projection is much more legible and usable for me. Long-lived active documents like STEERING.md should also be designed with only as much prose as they need, in such a way as to aid rapid comprehension and reduce VCS churn and conflicts. legible artifacts can be of various forms, and would in at least some cases follow patterns such as dictated for prototyping in `ds-prototype`; but should not be throwaway, rather collected as documentation snapshots of decision/design, and even as regression oracles. - -To your question: I think it's safe to assume that time constraints for a live demo preclude eliciting a complete model *during the live demo*; but that doesn't mean that attendees will not ask to try it out, and it's also possible that external factors or stakeholder decisions will change the focus/substance of the demo with short notice, so I think an implementation that is reasonably capable of a full model elicitation, which works better than a "baseline" (see our earlier comparisons, where we had claude code elicit based on a bare flat prompt), has to be considered important, but it takes time and the judgement of the quality of the output takes time. It's the more bounded scenarios where we want it to be clear (legible) that the elicitation process results in consequent change - -## Assistant - -**Tool Use:** `skill` - -```json -{ - "name": "dogsled:ds-prototype", - "arguments": "Use its artifact and proof conventions as a reference while shaping persistent legibility artifacts for Brunch Frontier 0; do not build a prototype yet." -} -``` - -## User - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CfzGWw83L0SzcJU5WFJ` - -``` -{ - "content": [ - { - "text": "\n# ds-prototype Skill\n\n\n\n\n# Prototype\n\nA prototype is **throwaway code that answers a question**. The question decides the shape.\n\n## Pick a branch\n\nIdentify which question is being answered — from the user's prompt, the surrounding code, or by asking if the user is around:\n\n- **\"Does this logic / state model feel right?\"** → [LOGIC.md](LOGIC.md). Build a single shareable HTML file — free-play buttons plus tabbed guided walkthroughs — that pushes the state machine through cases that are hard to reason about on paper, and that a non-developer can drive.\n- **\"What should this look like?\"** → [UI.md](UI.md). Generate several radically different UI variations on a single route, switchable via a URL search param and a floating bottom bar.\n\nThe two branches produce very different artifacts — getting this wrong wastes the whole prototype. If the question is genuinely ambiguous and the user isn't reachable, default to whichever branch better matches the surrounding code (a backend module → logic; a page or component → UI) and state the assumption at the top of the prototype.\n\n## Rules that apply to both\n\nUse /ds-subtraction after you understand the question — the first sufficient prototype, not a smaller product.\n\n1. **Throwaway from day one, and clearly marked as such.** Locate the prototype code close to where it will actually be used (next to the module or page it's prototyping for) so context is obvious — but name it so a casual reader can see it's a prototype, not production. For throwaway UI routes, obey whatever routing convention the project already uses; don't invent a new top-level structure.\n2. **Trivial to run.** A UI prototype starts from one command in the project's task runner — `pnpm `, `python `, `bun `, etc. A logic demo is a single HTML file the user double-clicks. Either way, no thinking required to start it.\n3. **No persistence by default.** State lives in memory. Persistence is the thing the prototype is _checking_, not something it should depend on. If the question explicitly involves a database, hit a scratch DB or a local file with a clear \"PROTOTYPE — wipe me\" name.\n4. **Skip the polish.** No tests, no error handling beyond what makes the prototype _runnable_, no abstractions. The point is to learn something fast.\n5. **Surface the state.** After every action (logic) or on every variant switch (UI), print or render the full relevant state so the user can see what changed.\n6. **Capture it when done.** Fold any validated decision into the real code, then capture the prototype itself as a **primary source**: commit it to a throwaway branch, out of main, and leave a context pointer to that branch on the implementation issue. Capture the answer too — the verdict and the question it settled — in the issue or a commit. The main branch keeps only the validated decision.\n\n\nARGUMENTS: Use its artifact and proof conventions as a reference while shaping persistent legibility artifacts for Brunch Frontier 0; do not build a prototype yet.\n\nBase directory for this skill: file:///Users/lunelson/.config/amp/plugins/dogsled/skills/ds-prototype\nRelative paths in this skill (e.g., scripts/, reference/) are relative to this base directory.\n\n\n/Users/lunelson/.config/amp/plugins/dogsled/skills/ds-prototype/LOGIC.md\n/Users/lunelson/.config/amp/plugins/dogsled/skills/ds-prototype/UI.md\n/Users/lunelson/.config/amp/plugins/dogsled/skills/ds-prototype/agents/openai.yaml\n\n", - "type": "text" - } - ] -} -``` - -## Assistant - -**Tool Use:** `shell_command` - -```json -{ - "command": "cat /Users/lunelson/.config/amp/plugins/dogsled/skills/ds-prototype/LOGIC.md", - "workdir": "/Users/lunelson/Code/hashintel/hash/libs/@hashintel/brunch-agent", - "timeout_ms": 10000 -} -``` - -## User - -**Tool Result:** `TU-034CfzOJwx7qDvtPhxnrcK` - -``` -{ - "output": "# Logic Prototype\n\nA single, self-contained HTML file — a **shareable demo** — that lets anyone drive a state model by clicking buttons. Use this when the question is about **business logic, state transitions, or data shape** — the kind of thing that looks reasonable on paper but only feels wrong once you push it through real cases.\n\nBecause it's one file with nothing to install, you can hand it to a non-developer — a designer, a PM, a domain expert — and let them feel the model for themselves. So it speaks their language, not the code's.\n\n## When this is the right shape\n\n- \"I'm not sure if this state machine handles the edge case where X then Y.\"\n- \"Does this data model actually let me represent the case where...\"\n- \"I want to feel out what the API should look like before writing it.\"\n- Anything where someone wants to **press buttons and watch state change**.\n\nIf the question is \"what should this look like\" — wrong branch. Use [UI.md](UI.md).\n\n## Process\n\n### 1. State the question\n\nBefore writing code, write down what state model and what question you're prototyping. One paragraph, at the top of the demo (in a visible intro, not just a comment). A logic prototype that answers the wrong question is pure waste — make the question explicit so it can be checked later, whether the user is watching now or returning to it AFK.\n\n### 2. Isolate the logic in a portable module\n\nPut the actual logic — the bit that's answering the question — in a single `